Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: August 13, 2018 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Advisory Committees of Council/Administrative Building Design Task Force/2018/Administrative Building Design Task Force - 13 Aug 2018 - Agenda.pdf)


Document Text

Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Monday, August 13, 2018 – 12:30 p.m. Bud Clayton Memorial Room, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie, ON

AGENDA Page 1.

Call to Order

Adoption of the Agenda a) That the agenda for the August 13, 2018 meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force be adopted.

Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof

Adoption of Minutes a) Minutes of Meeting held July 18, 2018

2-4

That the minutes of the Administrative Design Task Force meeting held July 18, 2018 be adopted. 5.

Deputations and/or Presentations

Reports a) Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administrative Offices

Communications

Other Business

Next Meeting

Adjournment

5 - 13

Page 1 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Minutes of the Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting July 18, 2018 A meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force was held in the Bud Clayton Memorial Room, County Administrative Office, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:00 pm. Present: Councillor Vandewal, Chair Councillor Dewey, Vice Chair Councillor Inglis Councillor Nossal County Staff Present: Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement/GIS Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk, (Recording Secretary) Also Present: Robert Wood, 8020 Info Inc. (Facilitator) 1.

Call to Order

The Chair called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m. 2.

Adoption of the Agenda

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Nossal Councillor Dewey

That the agenda for the July 18, 2018 meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force be adopted. Carried 3.

Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof

There were none

Minutes of Meeting held July 18, 2018

Page 2 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Adoption of Minutes a)

Minutes of Meeting held April 18, 2018

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Nossal Councillor Dewey

That the minutes of the Administrative Design Task Force meeting held April 18, 2018 be adopted. Carried b)

Minutes of Meeting held June 27, 2018

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Nossal Councillor Dewey

That the minutes of the Administrative Design Task Force meeting held June 27, 2018 be adopted. Carried 5.

Deputations and/or Presentations 

Reports a)

Facilitated Session with Robert Wood – Follow-up to Previous Meeting

Mr. Wood provided the Task Force with a handout based on previous discussions and a path moving forward, a copy of which is attached to the record in the Clerk’s Office. Discussions took place regarding clarifications on the proposals for a shared facility with comments on same as follows:  Confirmation on site location parameters – it was agreed a site would need to be located in the County in either Sydenham, Inverary or Harrowsmith.  Interests in a potential third-party co-locate – it was communicated that the Township of South Frontenac would be interested in being a third party if the location is in the Township of South Frontenac.  Functional, space and other site/building requirements – potential shared spaces include the front foyer/reception, boardroom/council chamber, lunch room, washroom space.  Shared Services – centralize IT and server room, meeting rooms (large amounts and small amounts of attendees), parking. Improvements in efficiencies and

Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Minutes July 18, 2018

Minutes of Meeting held July 18, 2018

Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

  

service delivery quality (developers only need to go to one place). The Municipality of North Grenville was also noted where the municipal building also incorporates community space such as a theatre, meeting rooms and an arena. Capital and lifecycle costs – the various financing Models noted on page 5 were discussed identifying a 25 – 30 year lifecycle. Operational, financial or governance concerns – 3 options are available to the County; 1) alone, 2) with the CRCA and Township of South Frontenac, 3) with the Township South Frontenac. Site selection, construction, financial structure and nature of partnership – A location outside of the County was off the table unless it stays at its current location. The Committee also discussed if this building is left vacant due to a new build, this may affect Council’s decision. Timelines/milestones – the Committee agreed with the timelines and milestones set out in the report.

Next Steps The next stage of discussions needs to show concrete savings and reasons for a partnership with the CRCA. If savings of between 15 and 20 percent are not achievable, a partnership would not move forward. The County and CRCA CAO’s will meet to work out their respective due diligence on these potentials and come back to a joint meeting in August. The Township of South Frontenac should also be included in these conversations. 7.

Communications 

Other Business

There was none. 9.

Next Meeting

The next meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force is scheduled for Monday, August 13, 2018 at 12:30 p.m. 10.

Adjournment

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Dewey Councillor Inglis

That the meeting hereby adjourn at 1:37 pm Carried

Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Minutes July 18, 2018

Minutes of Meeting held July 18, 2018

Page 3 of 3

Page 4 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 1 of 9

Shared Facilities Concept Planning Session: August 13th, 2018 Noon, Mon. August 13

Location: Frontenac County Offices - Frontenac Room

Facilitator: Rob Wood

Discussion Guide: Our goal for this session will be to confirm whether or not the CRCA and County of Frontenac (and/or South Frontenac Township) wish to pursue next steps to validate the potential for a partnership and co-location of administrative offices at a shared site. Informal Mixing Time / Lunch Provided

Noon 12:30 pm

Welcome and Overview of the Session

12:40 pm

Decision Point: Validate the Case for Shared Facilities, or Not? 

Review identified space requirements and potential efficiencies (pg 5).

Review “downstream” issues to be set aside for now (shared services, site).

Determine whether to further validate the initial concept in a next step, or not, and if so, to confirm what work-up might be required for partners to make their final, individual “in/out” decisions on a project — for example: — — — — — —

architectural/engineering analysis of the initial needs assessment, preliminary conceptual/schematic floor plan based on partner needs, potential configurations of common space for best efficiencies, requirements for parking, water & similar services, building code etc, potential options to preserve brand identities on shared site, and initial budget-level estimates for comparison with stand-alone options.

Confirm specific partnerships & sharing options for further analysis (pg 2).

Confirm general search area/boundaries for any potential shared sites (pg 3).

Review/confirm the timelines applicable to any potential shared options.

2:10 pm

Break

2:30 pm

Time Reserved for Further Discussion (as required)

3:15 pm

Determine immediate next steps and timelines for decisions

Communications and process tasks

Wrap-up/Next Steps & Takeaways

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 5 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 2 of 9

Highlights from Partner Meetings Since June 27th, 2018: Following the joint meeting held June 27th, the partners each held their own planning sessions to consider their positions on the shared administrative office option. These notes highlight some of the more significant outcomes.

Clarification of the Decision Framework: 

Each partner plans to compare the costs and benefits for a shared option against their own stand-alone options, which vary from partner to partner.

A significant potential (and credible) benefit will be needed to justify the trade-offs involved in sharing. For example, one suggested criteria was that a shared option should offer savings of 15% or more vs. going alone.

Non-financial concerns and brand/identity desires emerged more strongly as factors in any final decision.

The Township of South Frontenac has since indicated its potential interest in a shared facility and has engaged in the process. Some see the two municipalities as having a natural functional and brand fit on a shared site. Township participation is predicated on a location in South Frontenac.

Critical timelines for proceeding with either shared or stand-alone options vary from partner to partner. The process may require joint agreement on a “fish or cut bait” deadline, perhaps shortly after year end, for commitment decisions on whether to proceed together or not.

Process concerns: 

One concern was expressed about the potential risk of a partner bailing on a sharing deal part-way through the process, and how to manage that risk.

Resolutions will be needed from councils.

Current shortlist of options to be explored: 

County and CRCA

Three-way (CRCA, County and South Frontenac)

CRCA alone and County with South Frontenac

All three go on their own.

Even if the idea of a shared option goes no further, the current process needs to demonstrate due diligence and be able to explain a “no-go” for a joint project.

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 6 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 3 of 9

Functional space and other site/building requirements: 

Partners expressed desire for closer scrutiny of how much space (and cost) would really be saved by sharing a facility.

Further analysis of site requirements will also be needed, related to — parking lot and service/amenity needs, — impact on site services if a three-way/90-staff building is pursued, and — implications for “customer” or “user” traffic.

A shared site is not critical to opportunities for shared services: 

Consensus seemed to emerge that options for sharing services (such as backoffice functions) are not that dependent on sharing a site/facility. Some services are shared now and others could be in future, either way.

Some expressed scepticism about hard cost savings on services (although there may be potential for service quality improvements, ease of staffing, and/or better management of risk and future growth in costs).

It is probably premature and would complicate matters at this stage to enter into discussions with community agencies or other potential tenants who would not be full partners in developing the project.

Area of search / parameters for potential location of a shared site: The question of how many and which partners are willing to pursue a shared option must be resolved before more specific criteria for a site search can be determined. Location preferences, site size, building size and service requirements, brand implications and other strategic considerations will all depend on the priorities of the particular partners involved. In discussions with all parties to date, however, the boundaries of a potential area of search have been narrowed to: 

North of 401, south of Rutledge Road, east of Hwy 38 and west of Hwy10

South Frontenac (Harrowsmith, Inverary, Sydenham)

North part of Kingston close to the 401

Proximity to natural or other assets, services and infrastructure will no doubt be factors in selection of any final site. Information from studies currently under way, such as the Frontenac Communal Services Study expected later this year, may also inform or influence site selection options.

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 7 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 4 of 9

Budget estimates / options for capital and lifecycle costs:

There is continuing interest in design/build/lease options (if possible/available).

Partner options must take into account the costs of renovation and/or disposition of current assets. There may also be financial opportunity costs (e.g. other projects need investment).

Different financing options and costs depend on the partners involved.

A timeline for proposed building/financing etc should be 20 years (leases <21).

A growth factor of 2.5% per year has been built into estimates.

Timelines/milestones: 

Proposed timelines seem acceptable: — 2018: work through agreement in principle (“pre-nuptial”) by early fall — 2019: sort out the financing arrangements / budget issues — 2020: complete the design work — 2021: start the construction build, for completion perhaps in 2022

Any delays in moving forward will probably mean increased construction costs.

It will be necessary to accommodate the municipal election cycle in October and new councils taking office thereafter.

Next Step: Proposal for Decision/Direction THAT, on the basis of the partners’ initial discussions and high-level assessment of the potential for savings and other benefits by sharing administrative offices on a common site, IT IS RECOMMENDED that a budget of $12,000 be allocated to engage appropriate architectural and engineering expertise to confirm these assessments and provide a report by the end of October enabling the partners to make a final decision on pursuing a shared development project, or not. Costs of this assignment are to be shared equally among the partners. Scope of the assignment is to include: — — — — — —

architectural/engineering analysis of the initial needs assessment, preliminary conceptual/schematic floor plans to meet partner needs, options for potential configuration of common spaces for best efficiencies, implications for parking, water & similar services, building code etc, potential options to preserve brand identities on shared site, and initial budget-level estimates for comparison with stand-alone options.

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 8 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 5 of 9

Comparison of Space Needs and Potential for Sharing A follow-up task assigned at the June 27th joint meeting was to confirm initial estimates of space requirements for each partner (figures below now include South Frontenac), and to identify spaces that could be shared and might be further explored for potential space savings in a shared facility. The summary below provides highlights. (Note: Areas are estimated in square feet, with a 35% gross up to cover full space requirements beyond core functional needs.)

Frontenac County

CRCA

South Frontenac

DEDICATED SPACE

DEDICATED SPACE

DEDICATED SPACE

AMOUNT OF SPACE THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR SHARING IN WHOLE OR PART

Estimates of Sq. Ft. Required

FC

CRCA

SF

Total

Dedicated: Potential Shareable:

4,374 3,842

6,830 3,729

6,495 5,391 .

17,699 12,962

TOTAL REQ’T:

8,216

10,559

11,886

30,661

[58%] [42%]

Spaces identified for potential sharing include reception, storage and IT/server areas and meeting spaces. The major functional uses for potential sharing include: 

Council Chambers/Large Meeting Room (4,833 sq. feet total used by three)

Lunchrooms and Kitchens (2,103 sq. feet total currently for 3 partners)

Public & Staff Washrooms (2,160 sq. feet total currently for 3 partners)

Note: The potential for space reductions would vary upon levels of shared use.

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 9 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 6 of 9

Frontenac County Space Allocation Estimate Gross Up Pct:

Position

Space Need (sq. ft.)

35% Space Need Gross Up (sq.ft.)

Functional Group

Open/ Private

Comments

Communications Officer Exec Assistant Receptionist Foyer/Reception Area Finance Clerk A/P Finance Clerk A/P Payroll Clerk - 1 Payroll Clerk - 2 Financial Analyst Flex Workspace (4) GIS Specialist Service Desk Analyst Desk Top Space for I.S. Community Planner Comm Dev. Officer Director of Corp Srv/Treasurer Mgr of Leg Srv/Clerk Chief Administrative Officer Storage Space Deputy Treasurer Occ Health Nurse Mgr of HR HR Generalist Network Administrator Mgr of I.S.

96 96 96 150 96 96 96 96 96 384 120 96 96 96 96 200 120 200 144 120 120 144 96 120 120

130 130 130 203 130 130 130 130 130 518 162 130 130 130 130 270 162 270 194 162 162 194 130 162 162

C.S. C.S. C.S. C.S. Finance Finance Finance Finance Finance Flex I.S. I.S. I.S. Pl & Ec Dev Pl & Ec Dev C.S. C.S. C.S. C.S. Finance HR/Occ H HR/Occ H HR/Occ H I.S. I.S.

Open Open Open Open Open Open Private Private Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private

Access to public required Confidentiality concerns - secure area/Adj. to CAO Needs to be near foyer - security concerns Seating for 4 to 6 Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Students, Interns, mobile office, quiet lounge Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Workbench area Access to public required Access to public required Confidentiality concerns - secure area Ideally close to Lg Meeting Room Ideally close to Lg Meeting Room Maybe two spaces Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - easy access for staff Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area Confidentiality concerns - secure area

Server Room Mechanical Meeting Room Sm Meeting Room Med Meeting Room Lg/Council Ch Mgr of Ec Dev Dir of Pl & Ec Dev Accessible Washrooms Copy Room Kitchen Lunch Room Total

200 150 150 300 800 96 200 400 200 200 200 6086

270 203 203 405 1080 130 270 540 270 270 270 8216

I.S. Mech Meeting Meeting Meeting Pl & Ec Dev Pl & Ec Dev Washroom I.S. Staff Staff

Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private

Maybe two spaces Secure area Generally staff use Access to public required Access to public required Access to public required Access to public required Assumes same as Fairmount Auditorium Noisy space Ideally close to Lg Meeting Room

Potential Sharable

2846

3842

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 10 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 7 of 9

South Frontenac Space Allocation Estimate Gross Up Pct: Space Need (sq. ft.)

Position CAO Executive Assistant Clerk Mayor VAULT storage

35% Space Need Gross Up (sq.ft.) Room Type

Public

150 100 120 120 120 120

203 135 162 162 162 162

OFFICE PRIVATE OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE STORAGE

a a

980

1323

MEETING

public

300 108

405 146

MEETING KITCHEN

public public

Treasurer Deputy Treasurer Accounting Clerk Payroll Clerk Treasury Clerk Treasury Clerk HR Officer Student IT specialist IT WORKSPACE Roll Files Front Counter storage

120 120 100 100 100 100 120 100 100 100 144 200 144

162 162 135 135 135 135 162 135 135 135 194 270 194

OFFICE OFFICE OPEN PRIVATE OPEN OPEN OFFICE OPEN OPEN OPEN STORAGE OPEN STORAGE

Director of Development Services Planner Planning Assistant GIS Specialist Building Admin Assistant Chief building Official Building Inpsector Building Inspector Student Roll Files Counter service

120 120 100 100 100 120 100 100 100 144 200

162 162 135 135 135 162 135 135 135 194 270

OFFICE OFFICE PRIVATE OPEN OPEN OFFICE OPEN OPEN OPEN STORAGE OPEN

Intake room / meeting for 8 Intake room / meeting for 8 Reception / waiting area for 6 Receptionist Washrooms for public mail/copier/office supplies

168 168 144 100 600 144

227 227 194 135 810 194

MEETING MEETING OPEN OPEN WASH OPEN

Kitchen and lunch room Washrooms for staff lockers and showers

600 600 225

810 810 304

KITCHEN WASH WASH

IT Server Room

225

304

IT

Growth: 3 offices Growth: 5 staff

360 500 8804

486 675 11885

Council Chamber / meeting room for (9 council, 5 staff, 40 public) Council Recess Room for ( 9 council and 5 staff) Servery

Total Potential Sharable

3993

b b

a

b

public public public public

b

5391

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 11 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 8 of 9

Admin, ODC, Maint Subtotal

CRCA Basic Space Needs

Admin, ODC, Maint Subtotal

Admin, Maint

Office Dimensions

Open/C losed Area (Ft2)

10x15

C

150

203

150

150

Assistant, Chair & General Manager

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

Receptionist/Clerk

10x10

O

100

135

100

100

General Manager

Grossed up - 35% Area (Ft2) Area (Ft2)

Admin

350 Manager, Corporate Services

473

Area (Ft2)

350

350

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

GIS Analyst

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Applicaton Support Analyst

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Student

6x6

O

36

49

36

36

Supervisor, Finance

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

Financial Analyst

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Student

6x6

O

36

49

36

36

Supervisor, Communication & Education

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

Coordinator, Communications

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Coordinator, Strategic Partnerships

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Senior Conservation Educator

8x9

O

72

97

Conservation Educator

8x9

O

72

97

Conservation Educator

8x9

O

72

97

Student

6x6

O

36

Supervisor, Information Technology

1084 Manager, Conservation Lands

49 1463

36 868

10x10

C

100

135

100

10x10

C

100

135

100

Coordinator, Forestry

8x9

O

72

97

72

Coordinator, Operations & Enforcement

8x9

O

72

97

72

Conservation Operations

6x6

O

36

49

36

Conservation Operations

6x6

O

36

49

36

Coordinator, Operations Planning

8x9

O

72

97

72

Coordinator, Mac Johnson Wildlife Area

8x9

O

72

97

72

Coordinator, Little Cataraqui Creek

8x9

O

72

97

Student

6x6

O

36

Supervisor, Operations & Maintenance

668

49 902

36 868

36 596

100

72

36 208

Manager, Watershed Planning & Engineering

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

Supervisor, Development Review

10x10

C

100

135

100

100

Resource Planner

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Resource Planner

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Development Officer

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Coordinator, Lands Stewardship

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Engineer, Water Resources

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Technologist, Water Resources

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Coordinator, Watershed Planning

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Coordinator, Source Protection

8x9

O

72

97

72

72

Student

6x6

O

36

49

36

812

1096

812

36 812

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 12 of 13

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 CRCA – County of Frontenac Facility Planning  Page 9 of 9

Admin, ODC, Maint Subtotal Open/C losed Area (Ft2)

CRCA Basic Space Needs

Admin, ODC, Maint Subtotal

Admin, Maint

Grossed up - 35% Area (Ft2) Area (Ft2)

Admin Potential to Share Grossed up

Area (Ft2)

Meeting Rooms Small (4 - 6 people)

10x12

C

120

162

120

120

162

Small (4 - 6 people)

10x12

C

120

162

120

120

162

Medium (10 people)

10x20

C

200

270

200

200

270

Large (30 people)

30x50

C

1500

2025

1500

1500

2025

1940

2619

1940

1940

2619

Meeting, Lunch, Storage Rooms Storage - Filing, Library & Office Supplies

15x20

C

300

405

300

300

Storage - Monitoring Equipment

10x12

C

120

162

120

120

Storage Building Maintenance

8x9

C

72

97

72

72

Locker Room(s) and Showers

30x40

C

1200

1620

1200

1200

Lunchroom/Kitchen

15x30

C

450 2142

608 2892

450

300 72

450

2142

2142

450 1110

Laboratory Space Electronics - rain gauges, telemetry, batteries

15x15

C

225

304

225

225

Wet - water quality, biology

15x20

C

300

405

300

300

Computer - desktop setup, servers, switches

15x20

C

300

405

300

Total Staff Space Requirements

300

825

1114

825

825

7,821

10,558

7,533

7,145

3,729

For Use of CRCA/County of Frontenac ONLY  2018, 8020Info Rights reserved. help@8020info.comwww.8020info.com

Next Steps to Validate Potential Partnership and Co-location of Administ…

Page 13 of 13

Help support independent journalism
If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.
Buy Me a Coffee