Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: July 17, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Advisory Committees of Council/Administrative Building Design Task Force/2019/Administrative Building Design Task Force - 17 Jul 2019 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Wednesday, July 17, 2019 – 11:00 a.m. or immediately following the County Council meeting Bud Clayton Memorial Room, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie, ON
AGENDA Page 1.
Call to Order
Adoption of the Agenda a) That the agenda for the July 17, 2019 meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force be adopted.
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
Adoption of Minutes a) Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
3-6
That the minutes of the Administrative Design Task Force meeting held April 17, 2019 be adopted.
7 - 18
Deputations and/or Presentations
Reports a) 2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move Forward with a Shared Facility Recommendation: Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize staff to proceed with negotiations with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for joint tenancy and subsequently, detailed designs for 2069 Battersea Road for Option 2, that being a joint administrative facility for the County of Frontenac and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) to an upset of $100,000 to be expensed from the County’s Municipal Modernization Funds; And Further That should the CRCA advise the County of Frontenac that it does not wish to proceed with a joint administrative facility, that
Page 1 of 18
Page staff be authorized to proceed with detailed designs for Option 1. 7.
Communications
Other Business
Next Meeting
Adjournment
Page 2 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Minutes of the Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting April 17, 2019 A meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force was held in the Bud Clayton Memorial Room, County Administrative Office, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie on Wednesday, April 17, 2019 at 11:00 AM Present: Councillor Vandewal - Chair Councillor Doyle – Vice Chair Councillor Martin Councillor MacDonald Staff Present: Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk (Recording Secretary) Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement/GIS Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Others Wayne Orr, CAO, Township of South Frontenac Geoff Rae, General Manager, CRCA Tom Beaubiah, Manager, Conservation Lands Rob McRae, Manager, Corporate Services Wayne Hill, CRCA Board Member representing the City of Kingston Terry Richardson, CRCA Board Member representing the Town of Greater Napanee Alan Revill, CRCA Board Member representing the Township of South Frontenac 1.
Call to Order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m. 2.
Adoption of the Agenda
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor MacDonald
That the agenda for the April 17, 2019 meeting of the Administrative Building Design Task Force be adopted. Carried 3.
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
There were none.
Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
Page 3 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Adoption of Minutes a)
Minutes of Meeting held February 20, 2019
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor MacDonald Councillor Martin
That the minutes of the Administrative Design Task Force meeting held February 20, 2019 be adopted. Carried 5.
Deputations and/or Presentations
Reports a)
Shared Facility Next Steps - Determining Partners
Mr. Rob Wood, 8020 Info Inc. took the Task Force through the Shared Facility Next Steps Discussion Guide beginning with a recap of the results/implications of the architectural assessment and the requirement of the partners regarding their due diligence work and future intentions. It was also noted that the Provincial budget announced earlier this week may have an effect on the ways that partners do business in terms of roles and responsibilities. Updates from partners on due diligence work & future intentions Township of South Frontenac Councillor Vandewal advised that the Township of South Frontenac Council has decided not to pursue a partnership at this time, given that no other options for the Township have been explored. Township Council has asked for staff to report back on costs for an addition to its existing facility. CRCA update Councillor Revill advised that at this point, the CRCA remains in the partnership as the condition of its building has not changed. It was noted that the provincial funding to the CRCA has been reduced; however this is a small portion of the CRCA’s budget. County of Frontenac update Mr. Pender advised that the County of Frontenac’s first choice is a partnership; however if that is off the table, the existing facility would be renovated. He noted the issues with the Administrative Building which have not been addressed for the past 5 years, including issues with plumbing which left the building without water for 2 days, and staff working in fire ways and hallways. Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Minutes April 17, 2019
Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
Page 2 of 4
Page 4 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Determining the partners (or not) for next stage of project work With only the County of Frontenac and the CRCA moving forward with a partnership for a co-locate, there remains the potential to have the facility located within the City of Kingston, although some County Councillors felt that if the County were to invest in a new facility, it should be located within the County. If cost is the driver, the top 2 options would be either to build at the existing County site or build at the existing CRCA site. The lowest cost option would be to build at the County site as all infrastructure and servicing is already in place. To go elsewhere would incur additional costs of property acquisition and servicing and the CRCA site would be challenging as the site is a conservation area. With respect to concerns around branding, the CRCA brand is the Outdoor Centre and that Centre would stay on the existing site regardless of the outcome of site location. However administratively, visitors only attend the site on occasion or from the Professional Development Committee so any additional commute to this location will not influence that. Staff in the new facility would be office staff that do not attract a lot of visitors. It was noted that for the CRCA, it is price sensitive. Consensus was that the CRCA only requires office space so if a new build happens, it should be located at the County site. Space required by the CRCA would be similar to that of the County were it to relocate to the County site. The option to seek additional partners was also suggested. It was questioned if the existing County Administrative Building could support both County and CRCA staff should Frontenac Paramedics relocate. Confirming Next Steps There could be value in attracting a third party but this would depend on location. It can be kept in mind but is not a key issues. It would be more feasible to look at this site and look at a renovation as opposed to a new build. It was suggested that a professional look at this building to provide viable options to optimize the space, noting that this could be funded through the Modernization funding received by the County to look at shared services and cost efficiencies. Wrap-up/Next Steps & Takeaways CRCA staff will report back to its board and County staff will research on the costs to retain an architect to review the existing site of the County Administrative Building to determine the feasibility of its redevelopment to accommodate county staff in addition to CRCA staff and take a report directly to Council for authorization.
Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Minutes April 17, 2019
Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
Page 3 of 4
Page 5 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
b)
2019-047 Next Steps in Moving Forward with a Shared Facility
This report is for information purposes. 7.
Communications
Other Business
Next Meeting
At the call of the Chair. 10.
Adjournment
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Martin
That the meeting hereby adjourn at 12:22 p.m. Carried
Administrative Building Design Task Force Meeting Minutes April 17, 2019
Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
Page 4 of 4
Page 6 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Report 2019-092 Committee Recommend Report To:
Chair and Members of the Administrative Building Design Task Force
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk
Date of meeting:
July 17, 2019
Re:
Administrative Building Design Task Force – Authorization to Move Forward with a Shared Facility
Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize staff to proceed with negotiations with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for joint tenancy and subsequently, detailed designs for 2069 Battersea Road for Option 2, that being a joint administrative facility for the County of Frontenac and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) to an upset of $100,000 to be expensed from the County’s Municipal Modernization Funds; And Further That should the CRCA advise the County of Frontenac that it does not wish to proceed with a joint administrative facility, that staff be authorized to proceed with detailed designs for Option 1. Background In 2017 discussions began with the CRCA with respect to the construction of a potential joint administrative facility. Following several meetings and discussions by the Administrative Building Design Task Force, Council authorized staff to engage appropriate architectural services to validate initial assessments to enable the partners to make a decision on whether or not to pursue the next stage of a shared development project. Having respect for tax dollars and keeping costs down, it was determined the lowest cost option would be to use the existing County site as all infrastructure and servicing is already in place.
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 7 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
This resulted in County Council, at its meeting held May 15, 2019, being presented with Report 2019-059 after which the following resolution was passed: Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Authorization to Engage Architectural Expertise to Review the County Administration Building report; And Further That staff be authorized to engage appropriate architectural expertise to review and determine the feasibility and costs to redevelop the County Administration Building to accommodate County of Frontenac and Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Administrative staff to an upset of $10,000 to be expensed from the County’s Modernization Funds. And Further That the scope of the assignment, including life cycle costs include:
- architectural analysis of the County Administration Office “old house”,
- preliminary conceptual/schematic floor plans to meet partner needs,
- options for potential configuration of common spaces for best efficiencies,
- implications for parking, water & similar services, building code etc,
- Initial budget-level estimates for comparison with stand-alone option for the County. Comment Colbourne & Kembel, Architects Inc. was retained to carry out the facility analysis of the County Administrative Building, commonly referred to as “the old house”. The purpose of the analysis was to determine the feasibility and costs to redevelop the County Administration Building to accommodate County of Frontenac and CRCA Administrative staff. The draft Facility Analysis is attached to this report as Appendix A. Staff are recommending to proceed with Option 2 that would see a joint administrative facility for the County of Frontenac and the CRCA. The CRCA Board is set to meet in August at which time a decision by the CRCA is expected on whether it wishes to proceed with a joint facility. Staff are also recommending that should the CRCA advise the County of Frontenac that it does not wish to proceed with a joint administrative facility, that staff be authorized to proceed with detailed designs for Option 1, as issues with the existing centuries old house continue, specifically plumbing problems that have now required excavation in the basement to clear blockages and replace piping. Strategic Priorities Implications Priority 3: Champion and coordinate collaborative efforts with partners to resolve complex problems otherwise beyond the reach Specifically, the objectives that support this strategy states that the County will continue to pursue collaborative opportunities to achieve service and cost efficiencies and other economies through cost-sharing and shared services. This priority identifies the CRCA as a current and potential project partner Committee Report Administrative Building Design Task Force – Authorization to Move Forward with a Shared Facility July 17, 2019
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 2 of 3
Page 8 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
In addition, shared facilities reduce the overall environmental foot print required to occupy two separate facilities. Depending upon outcomes/options in terms of a shared facility, the overall greenhouse gas foot print of the County could be reduced as a result of this project, thereby assisting in meeting our GHG emission requirements as noted in the County’s Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan. Financial Implications The County of Frontenac was one of 404 municipalities that received funding under the Municipal Modernization Fund (MMF) program. The County’s allocation is $725,000. Report 2019-089 - Proposed Allocation of Supplemental Provincial Funding, received earlier today by County Council recommended that $100,000 be allocated to the Administration Facility Architectural project to cover this cost. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Geoff Rae, GM, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement/GIS Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer
Committee Report Administrative Building Design Task Force – Authorization to Move Forward with a Shared Facility July 17, 2019
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 3 of 3
Page 9 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
County of Frontenac Administration Building
DRAFT Facility Analysis June 19, 2019 Note to Reader: This analysis is based on basic space needs estimates provided by the users. No in-depth functional needs analysis has been completed at this point in the process. Refer to ‘Background & Assumptions’ paragraphs below. All floor plans and site plans have been created for cost comparison purposes only, and thus should not be considered concept designs or draft plans.
- INTRODUCTION 1.1. County of Frontenac is considering renovating their existing facility at 2069 Battersea Road to serve their growing office space needs. Colbourne & Kembel, Architects Inc (CKA) was retained by the Planning Group to complete conceptual plans and high-level cost analysis to inform the business case for moving forward. CKA recently prepared a Shared Facility Study to accommodate three user groups (CRCA, County of Frontenac and South Frontenac Township) in one new building on an undetermined new site; however South Frontenac Township decided not to proceed further. 1.2. Under this new report, the group considering the new facility is: 1.2.1.County of Frontenac (CF) – The County encompasses almost 4,000 square kilometers, from Wolfe Island in the south, and northward as far as Black Donald Lake. It is made up of four municipalities: Central Frontenac, Frontenac Islands, North Frontenac, and South Frontenac. Its offices are currently located on Battersea Road in Glenburnie. 1.2.2.Cataraqui Regional Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Frontenac Paramedics are potential tenants of leasable space in one of the design concepts outlined later in the report. 1.3. The designs and analysis below explore two main options: 1.3.1.Renovating their existing office space and acquiring the space currently occupied by Frontenac Paramedics to operate a standalone, CF-only facility. This option will also require constructing a small addition. 1.3.2.Renovating their existing office space and acquiring the space currently occupied by Frontenac Paramedics to operate joint facility with CRCA. This option will require constructing a large addition. 1.4. This report uses the space allocation requirements from the original Shared Facility Analysis which clarified the required space for CF and CRCA (refer to Appendix C - Shared Facilities Concept Planning Session).
- BACKGROUND & ASSUMPTIONS 2.1. Each concept is hypothetical, and is being designed solely for costing purposes. For this reason, no architectural features or finishes that are only aesthetic are being shown or considered. This means that the resulting costing is base-line and more valid for comparison purposes. 2.2. For all occupancy-related assumptions, occupant loads have been calculated based on the anticipated maximum occupant load rather than based on floor area. This will result in a more realistic assessment of washroom needs.
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 10 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CRCA/County of Frontenac Shared Facility Analysis
June 19, 2019
2.3.
For the load calculation of the office areas (D occupancy) we’ve used the staff count listed in the user’s space needs chart, plus 10 additional ‘visiting’ occupants, which would allow for increased occupancy for future growth, visiting clientele, summer students, interns, temporary staff, etc. 2.4. For the ‘dedicated’ floor space for each user group, we have used the estimates in the Space Allocation Estimates provided by each group, adjusted if necessary, for space deemed ‘sharable’ in our joint facility. 2.5. For the calculation of the total area of meeting rooms required (A2 occupancy), we have used the areas on the conceptual floor plans, since the shared facility meeting room requirements are based on meeting the needs of all users, and thus are based on a designed layout as opposed to hypothetical floor areas. 2.6. Similarly, for ‘shared’ or ‘shareable’ space we have used the areas drawn from the conceptual floor plans, since this area will more accurately reflect the efficiencies possible with the shared facility. 2.7. We have assumed for both options that the Frontenac Paramedics office space is to be relocated to an off-site location. 2.8. The existing site is 2069 Battersea Road, which is located in the Kingston Township. Zoning By-Law 76-26 has been used. 2.8.1.The lot is zoned I (Institutional). 2.8.2.The site is served by an existing well and septic system, and we have assumed that there is adequate capacity to support any proposed facility expansion options. An evaluation of the existing septic system will be required to determine if upgrades would be required for any proposed redevelopment. 2.9. Note that because the user-provided floor areas were provided in imperial units, our figures in this report are also imperial. Typically, we would use metric units. 3. FACILITY OPTIONS (refer to Appendix A - Floor Plans) 3.1. Separate Facility at 2069 Battersea Road 3.1.1. Option 1 – County of Frontenac offices only at 2069 Battersea Road 3.1.1.1. Based on the estimates in the ‘Shared Facilities Concept Planning Guide’, to accommodate entire CF we estimate that an extension of about 1,700 ft2 would be required (shown to the East in Option 1 plan). In Option 1, we have suggested a layout that provides: · Public access offices on both levels of the existing heritage house, plus public spaces in a new addition facing Battersea Road (to replace the current inadequate addition, which will be demolished). · Private office spaces located in the lower level of the main building, in the former Frontenac Paramedics space. 3.1.1.2. For the concept plan, an occupant load of 107 persons is used for the calculation of water closets. This means there will need to be: · 8 total water closets 3.1.2. Option 2 – County of Frontenac and CRCA joint facility at 2069 Battersea Road 3.1.2.1. Based on the estimates in the ‘Shared Facilities Concept Planning Guide’, to accommodate office space for both user groups and the common areas, an addition of about 6,300 ft2 would be required. In Option 2, we have suggested a layout that provides: 2
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 11 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CRCA/County of Frontenac Shared Facility Analysis
June 19, 2019
· ·
3.1.2.2.
Shared entry and reception Public spaces on first floor of the existing heritage house, with a large addition facing Battersea Road (to replace the current addition). · Public access offices for CF located on both levels of the existing heritage house, plus a second floor addition facing Battersea Road. · CRCA offices located in the lower level of the main building, in the former Frontenac Paramedics space, plus a 1-storey addition. For the concept plan, an occupant load of 165 persons is used for the calculation of water closets. This means there will need to be: · 12 total water closets
- BY-LAW ANALYSIS AND SITE AREA 4.1. The existing lot at 2069 Battersea Road is located in the Kingston Township, and so the Zoning By-Law 76-26 applies. 4.2. Under Section 17 · Lot Area (Minimum): 2044 m2 (22,000 ft2) · Front Yard (Minimum): 6.1 m (20 ft) · Rear Yard (Minimum): 7.6 m (25 ft) · Interior Side Yard (Minimum): 6.1 m (20 ft) · Lot Coverage (Maximum): 30 percent · Landscaped Open Space (Minimum): 30 percent · Height of Building (Maximum): 10.7 m (35 ft) · Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5 (16) of the by-law · Parking space dimensions according to ‘Schedule C’ of the by-law
- Ontario Building Code (OBC) ANALYSIS 5.1. The existing Fairmount Home is classified as a Care and Treatment B2 Occupancy, which includes the office space occupied by Frontenac Paramedics and existing heritage house that currently accommodates the County offices. Conformance Articles for B2 Occupancies are more restrictive than Group D offices, so adequate fire separations between these may be required to avoid these restrictive B2 Conformance Articles for any proposed redevelopments to the office spaces (Group D Occupancy) and meeting spaces (A2 – Assembly Occupancy). A more thorough code analysis can be completed once an overall decision/direction for the administration offices is decided upon. 5.2. Part 11 of the building code applies to the renovation of an existing building. Where an existing building system is repaired or altered, the performance level of the building after the alteration or repair must be at least equal to the performance level of the building prior to the renovation.
- COST ESTIMATES (refer to Appendix B - Cost Estimates) 6.1. Initial Costs (site & construction) The following are Class D cost estimate (up to 30% variance). 6.1.1.Option 1 @ 2069 Battersea Road (County of Frontenac only): The total capital cost for this option is approximately $1,800,000; the existing heritage house, new extension and the lower space of main building accommodate the public areas and County of Frontenac offices. 6.1.2.Option 2 @ 2069 Battersea Road (County of Frontenac + CRCA): The total capital cost for this option is approximately $3,700,000; the existing heritage house and the extension
3
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 12 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CRCA/County of Frontenac Shared Facility Analysis
June 19, 2019
accommodate the common areas and County of Frontenac offices. The lower level of the main building and extension accommodate the CRCA offices. This option has the potential income stream from a leasing tenant (CRCA). 6.2. Operating Costs 6.2.1. Operating costs for the two options are not yet quantified for the draft report. 6.3. Life Cycle Cost Analysis: 6.3.1.Life cycle cost analysis for the two options are not yet quantified for the draft report. 7. SUMMARY 7.1.1.The initial cost estimate of Option 2 is more than double compared to Option 1. Option 2 requires a secondary service road to access the laboratory spaces on the south side of the currently occupied Frontenac Paramedics building. Although it has a substantially higher initial cost, with approximately 5,200 ft2 of leasable space, it has a potential income stream during the life of the building. The potential income stream from a leasing tenant is not yet factored into the cost estimates for Options 2 and will be included as part of section 6.2 and 6.3 of the final report. 7.1.2.A more in-depth summary will be included in the final report. 8. RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1. Recommendations will be included in the final report.
4
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 13 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CRCA/County of Frontenac Shared Facility Analysis
June 19, 2019
Appendix A Hypothetical Floor Plans
5
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 14 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Office
Office
Existing Building Area : 12,700 ft2 (1,180 m2) Extension Area : 1,700 ft2 (160 m2) Total Area : 14,400 ft2 (1,340 m2)
Server Room
Office 1
Office
Office Copy Room
2
Office
Required Toilet Fixtures Visitors + Large Meeting Room (55 people) : 3 Small/Medium Meeting Rooms (22 people) : 2 Frontenac County (30 people) : 3 Total Required : 8
Flex Workspace
4
Office
Office
Mechanical Room Office
6
Common Areas Frontenac County
5
Workstation Office
Lobby
Female W/R
Male W/R
2-sinks 2-water closets
2-sinks 1-water closet 1-urinal
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Small Meeting Room
Service Kitchen
Workstation
Lunch Room
Storage
Fairmount Home (not part of study)
DN UP
DN
Vestibule
Link
Office (2)
DN
Office
Office
Lobby Reception
DN
UP W/R W/R
Office
Office
Office
UP Office (2)
Medium meeting room
DN Meeting room
DN Office
Terrace
Universal W/R Kitchenette
Vestibule Large Meeting Room 45 seats
Ground Floor Plan
Property
Line
Second Floor Plan
Property
Line
OPTION 1 - Frontenac County Offices at 2069 Battersea Rd.
FRONTENAC COUNTY OFFICE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCALE - 1:250
2069 BATTERSEA RD, KINGSTON
COLBOURNE & KEMBEL, ARCHITECTS INC. 739D ARLINGTON PARK PLACE KINGSTON ONTARIO K7M 8MB
PROJ #19037
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
19.06.17
Page 15 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Office
Existing Building Area : 12,700 ft2 (1,180 m2) Extension Area : 6,300 ft2 (600 m2) Total Area : 19,000 ft2 (1,780 m2)
Office
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Office Workstation Workstation
Lobby
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation
Office Mechanical Room Office
Office
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation Lab space Workstation
Workstation
Common Areas Frontenac County CRCA
Office Workstation
Workstation Small meeting room
Required Toilet Fixtures Visitors + Large Meeting Room (73 people) : 3 Small/Medium Meeting Rooms (22 people) : 2 Frontenac County (30 people) : 3 CRCA (40 people) : 4 Total Required : 12
Workstation Female W/R
Male W/R
2-sinks 2-water closets
2-sinks 1-water closet 1-urinal
Storage Storage
Lobby
Workstation
Workstation
Workstation Locker & Shower room
Lab space
Lab space
Lobby Workstation
Workstation
Lunchroom/ Kitchen
Office
Storage
Fairmount Home (not part of study)
DN UP
DN
Vestibule
Link
Office (2)
DN
Office
DN
Office
Lobby Reception
UP W/R
Office
W/R
Office
Office
Office
Office (2)
UP
DN
Flex Workspace
Medium meeting room
Office Office Storage
UP
Workstation DN
Office Lobby
Universal W/R
Lobby
Kitchenette Large Meeting Room 19 seating 42 chairs
Small meeting room
Workstation
Server Room
Workstation
Office Office
Office
Office
Office
Workstation
Vestibule Large Meeting Room below
Ground Floor Plan
Property
Line
Second Floor Plan
Property
Line
OPTION 2 - Frontenac County and CRCA Offices at 2069 Battersea Rd.
FRONTENAC COUNTY OFFICE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCALE - 1:250
2069 BATTERSEA RD, KINGSTON
COLBOURNE & KEMBEL, ARCHITECTS INC. 739D ARLINGTON PARK PLACE KINGSTON ONTARIO K7M 8MB
PROJ #19037
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
19.06.18
Page 16 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CRCA/County of Frontenac Shared Facility Analysis
June 19, 2019
Appendix B Cost Estimates
6
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
Page 17 of 18
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Feasibility Study for County of Frontenac Class D Cost Estimate Area Option 1 @ 2069 Battersea Rd. (CF) Site Purchase (incl. existing building) Building Renovation (Major) Building Renovation (Minor) New Extension Site Construction Development Costs Consultant Costs Total Cost Including upcharge for LEED certification Option 2 @ 2069 Battersea Rd. (CF & CRCA) Site Purchase (incl. existing building) Building Renovation (Major) Building Renovation (Minor) New Extension Site Construction Development Costs Consultant Costs Total Cost Including upcharge for LEED certification
Unit
Cost/unit
Cost
10.2 acres ft² 12,700 ft² 1,700 ft²
$ $ $ $
150 75 260
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20% $
952,500 442,000 150,000 50,000 250,000 1,844,500 2,213,400
10.2 acres 5,200 ft² 7,500 ft² 6,300 ft²
$ $ $ $
150 75 240
780,000 562,500 1,512,000 500,000 50,000 300,000 3,704,500 4,445,400
2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move…
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 20% $
Page 18 of 18
