Published January 1, 2020

Word Count 74914 words

Reading Time 352 min read

Body: Planning Committee Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: 2020 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Advisory Committees of Council/Planning Advisory Committee/2020/Planning Open House - Sunbury Subdivision - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Public Open House - Sunbury Subdivision Wednesday, July 22, 2020 – 5 to 6 p.m. Open House to be held in Virtual Electronic Format, to register for the open house or learn how to participate, please visit: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_PRm4okyIRWi8LRu SkbLnPg

AGENDA Page Welcome The purpose of this Open House is to present and receive public input on the proposed Sunbury Plan of Subdivision.

2 - 12

13 - 320

Presentations Mr. Mike Keene, Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and presentation of the Development Reports 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, South Frontenac Township) This report is for information purposes only. The intent of this report is to provide the public with information on the proposed plan of subdivision. At a future date, the County of Frontenac Planning Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting to seek additional feedback from the public on the proposed development. Notice of the public meeting will be circulated to all properties owners within 120 meters and to anyone who has provided comments or requested to be notified of the decision.

Page 1 of 320

Public Open House

July 22, 2020

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 2 of 320

Sunbury Subdivision

The slides from today’s presentation are available on the County of Frontenac’s website under ‘Current Planning Applications’ at: https://www.frontenaccounty.ca/en/business/currentplanning-applications.aspx

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 3 of 320

Welcome to the Virtual Open House for the Sunbury Subdivision

∕ We encourage all participants to use the ‘Chat’ function, throughout the presentation to provide your feedback, questions, or concerns ∕ Please click the ‘Chat’ function, located at the bottom of the window

∕ We will be monitoring the chat and will answer any questions or comments as we proceed through the presentation

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 4 of 320

How to Participate

∕ There will be a question period following the presentation where we invite all participates to ask questions through the ‘Raise Hand’ function

∕ During the question period, click the ‘Raise Hand’ function at the bottom of the screen and the host will be notified that you wish to speak

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 5 of 320

How to Participate

∕ The Sunbury Subdivision is located west of Battersea Road and north of Moreland-Dixon Road ∕ The subject lands are within the Sunbury Settlement Area ∕ Planning applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment have been submitted for the proposed development Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 6 of 320

Background

∕ The subject lands are designated ‘Settlement Area’ in the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan

UR1

∕ The subject lands are zoned Urban First Density Residential (UR1) in the Zoning By-law 2003-75

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 7 of 320

Policy Background

∕ The draft plan of subdivision provides 33 lots and blocks, including: • 31 residential lots; • 1 parkland block; and • 1 lot potentially added to the neighbouring property. ∕ The subdivision is organized around a new street, which connects to the existing intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road ∕ The parkland block will connect the proposed subdivision to Gerald Ball Memorial Park, located adjacent to the subject site

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 8 of 320

Proposed Development

Land Use

Lots & Blocks

Area

Residential

1-31

28.79 ha

Streets/Reserves

Street A

2.64 ha

Parkland

Block 32

0.04 ha

Potential Lot Addition

Block 33

0.19 ha

Total

31.66 ha

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre… Page 9 of 320

Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision

∕ Site-specific Residential First Density Zone (UR1-XX) ∕ Relief from minimum lot area (Proposed: 6,000 m2) ∕ Relief from minimum lot frontage (Proposed 45.0 m)

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 10 of 320 Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre…

Proposed Zoning

∕ If you have a question, comment or concern, please click the ‘Raise Hand’ function now and the host will be notified that you wish to speak

∕ If you do not wish to speak please use the ‘Chat’ function to provide additional questions

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 11 of 320 Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre…

Any Questions?

If you have any additional feedback, please contact: Megan Rueckwald Manager of Community Planning 613.548.9400 ext. 351 mrueckwald@frontenaccounty.ca

Sunbury Subdivision

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 12 of 320 Mr. Mike Keene , Fotenn will provide a presentation and overview and pre…

We Look Forward to Hearing From You!

AGENDA ITEM #

Report 2020-066

Open House Report From:

Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning

Date of meeting: July 22, 2020 Re:

Open House – Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, South Frontenac Township)

Recommendation This report is for information purposes only. The intent of this report is to provide the public with information on the proposed plan of subdivision. At a future date, the County of Frontenac Planning Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting to seek additional feedback from the public on the proposed development. Notice of the public meeting will be circulated to all properties owners within 120 meters and to anyone who has provided comments or requested to be notified of the decision. Background On May 28, 2020, the County of Frontenac deemed an application for draft plan of subdivision complete pursuant to the Planning Act for a property legally described as Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2, former Township of Storrington, in the Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac. The lands are located within the Settlement Area of Sunbury in proximity to the intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road and municipally known as 3863 Battersea Road. The application was submitted by Kyle Nielissen of Forefront Engineering Inc., on behalf on the property owner, 2628100 Ontario Inc. This report provides an overview of the application and relevant policies and regulations that will be evaluated as part of the review of the development as well as the public consultation strategy. The proposed development is an application for draft plan of subdivision to divide the subject lands into 33 lots and blocks, including 31 lots for residential development, 1 parkland block (Block 32), and 1 block to be added to an adjacent property as a lot addition (Block 33). The lots will be accessed from a new municipal street with a connection to the existing intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road. The residential lots will range in size from 0.6 ha to 3.41 ha, with the typical residential lot having an area of 0.61 ha. The proposed parkland block (Block 32) will be approximately 0.04 ha and will formally connect Battersea Road through the new development to Gerald Ball Memorial Park.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 13 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Documents Submitted in Support of the Application

Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation, dated January 2011 Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated July 3, 2013 Addendum to Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated February 14, 2019 Hydrogeological Study, prepared by BluMetric Environmental, dated August 2019 Terrain Analysis, prepared by XCG Environmental Engineers & Scientists, dated January 18, 2013 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November, 2019 Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November 2019 Traffic Impact Study, prepared by GHD, dated March 11, 2020 Completed application forms for Zoning By-Law Amendment (submitted to the Township of South Frontenac) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (submitted to the County of Frontenac) Planning Demonstration Report, prepared by Fotenn Consultants Inc., dated April 6, 2020

A Zoning Bylaw Amendment application has been submitted to the Township of South Frontenac. Open House Section 3.0 Public Consultation Strategy of the Planning Demonstration Report (Fotenn Consultants Inc., April 6, 2020) proposes a strategy to consult with the public with respect to the subject applications in accordance with Ontario Regulation 544/06. The intent of the Open House is to provide information to the public regarding the proposed development, to collect feedback on the proposal, and discuss any comments or concerns early on in the review process. The Open House will be led by the applicant’s agent. Amendments to the Planning Act that came into effect on September 3, 2019, through Bill 108, limit third party appeals of plan of subdivision/condominium decisions including appeals from members of the public. Additional engagement, including the Open House, is proposed to ensure that public comments are heard throughout the development process in response to the Bill 108 amendments. Anyone may attend the open house and make a verbal statement, and/or submit comments in writing, either in support of or in opposition to the application. Anyone wishing to be notified of County Council’s decision on the subject application must submit a written request to: Planning Development, 2069 Battersea Rd. Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 planning@frontenaccounty.ca Open House Report – Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury) July 22, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 2 of 5

Page 14 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Technical Circulation Process and Review The application has been circulated to a number of internal departments and external agencies for review and comment. The responses to the technical circulation will be addressed in the application review and included in the comprehensive report for consideration. The application has been circulated to the following agencies:         

Township of South Frontenac; Malroz Engineering Inc. (County hydrogeologist peer review); Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority; KFL&A Public Health; Canada Post; Local School Boards; Telecommunication providers; Ontario Power Generation; and Hydro One Networks Inc.

The detailed planning report will include a review for consistency with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and conformity with the Township and County Official Plans. Public Comments To date, the County of Frontenac has received three comments from the public: 

A request to be notified of future engagement activities and the decision of County Council.



A question from a neighbouring property owner seeking assurances that normal farm practices will continue on the established farming operation in the vicinity of the proposed development, specifically, “Is there any protection for my farm operation from the new houses that will be built within sight and close to my barn and farm?”



A question from an abutting property owner seeking clarification on a development agreement registered on the lands under their ownership and the boundary of Lot 26.

Notice Provisions Pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, notice of complete application was sent by mail to all property owners (according to the latest assessment rolls) within 120 metres of the subject property and those who requested to be notified. A notice of Open House was circulated in accordance with the Planning Act, including required signage being placed on the property, and a notice was placed in the Frontenac News and on the County of Frontenac website.

Open House Report – Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury) July 22, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 3 of 5

Page 15 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Application Review Process The County of Frontenac is the approval authority for plans of subdivision and condominium across the County. The County works collaboratively with the Townships, commenting agencies, the public and the applicant throughout the review process to ensure proper development controls are in place to support good planning. Application review generally follows this process: 

Application is deemed completed once all necessary requirements are met



Notice of complete application is circulated to all property owners within 120 meters of the development and a number of agencies identified in the Planning Act



An Open House is held to receive comments from the public; the open house is often led by the applicant or their agent



Comments are received by the public and commenting agencies; the application is amended to meet the requirements identified during technical review



A Public Meeting is held by the County Planning Advisory Committee to receive additional comments from the public on the amended plan



The Township reviews all comments received on the plan and Township Council puts forward a recommendation to the County with conditions of draft plan approval (if applicable)



County Planning Advisory Committee reviews the recommendation from planning staff on the application taking into consideration all comments from the agencies, Township recommendation, and public comments received at the open house, public meeting and any written submissions. Planning Advisory Committee makes a recommendation to County Council to approve with conditions or refuse the application.



Notice of decision from County Council is circulated according to the Planning Act. If there are no appeals and draft plan approval is issued, the applicant moves forward with clearing a number of conditions to reach final approval.

Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Planning and Economic Development Department Township of South Frontenac Members of the Public Commenting Agencies Applicant and Applicant’s Agent

Open House Report – Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury) July 22, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 4 of 5

Page 16 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Attachments

Notice of Complete Application
Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November 2019
Planning Demonstration Report, prepared by Fotenn Consultants Inc., dated April 6, 2020
Concept Plan, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated April 2020
Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation, dated January 2011
Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated July 3, 2013
Addendum to Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated February 14, 2019
Hydrogeological Study, prepared by BluMetric Environmental, dated August 2019
Terrain Analysis, prepared by XCG Environmental Engineers & Scientists, dated January 18, 2013
Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November, 2019
Completed application form for Draft Plan of Subdivision
Traffic Impact Study, prepared by GHD, dated March 11, 2020

Open House Report – Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury) July 22, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 5 of 5

Page 17 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Notice of Complete Application Draft Plan of Subdivision Take Notice That in April 2020 the County of Frontenac received an application for a proposed draft plan of subdivision. On May 28, 2020 the application was deemed complete pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c.P.13, as amended (hereinafter the “Planning Act”). County File No. 10T-2020-001 Property Description: The lands are legally described as Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2, former Township of Storrington, in the Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac. The lands are located within the Settlement Area of Sunbury in proximity to the intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road. Agent/Applicant: Kyle Nielissen, Forefront Engineering Inc. Owner: Steve McClure, 2628100 Ontario Inc. Property Location: The lands are located within the Settlement Area of Sunbury in proximity to the intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road. The municipal address of the property is 3863 Battersea Road. Purpose and Effect of the Proposal: The proposed development is an application for Draft Plan of Subdivision to divide the subject lands into 33 lots and blocks, including 31 lots for residential development, 1 parkland block (Block 32), and 1 block to be added to an adjacent property as a lot addition (Block 33). The lots will be accessed from a new municipal street with a single connection to the existing intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road. The residential lots will range in size from 0.6 ha to 3.41 ha, with the typical residential lot having an area of 0.61 ha. The proposed parkland block (Block 32) will be approximately 0.04 ha and will formally connect Battersea Road through the new development to Gerald Ball Memorial Park. Studies Submitted to Date in Support of the Application:

Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation,dated January 2011 Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated July 3, 2013 Addendum to Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated February 14, 2019 Hydrogeological Study, prepared by BluMetric Environmental, dated August 2019 Terrain Analysis, prepared by XCG Environmental Engineers & Scientists, dated January 18, 2013 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November, 2019 Draft Plan of Subdivision, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November 2019 Traffic Impact Study, prepared by GHD, dated March 11, 2020 Completed application forms for Zoning By-Law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Planning Demonstration Report, prepared by Fotenn Consultants Inc., dated April 6, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 18 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Concurrent Applications: A Zoning Bylaw Amendment application has been submitted to the Township of South Frontenac in support of the application. Public Meeting: The County of Frontenac Planning Advisory Committee will hold the statutory public meeting at a future date to be determined, the notice of which will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. Notice will be provided to all property owners within 120 meters of the proposed development and to anyone who has provided a written request to be notified. Notification: If you wish to be notified of the decision of the County of Frontenac in respect to the proposed plan of subdivision, you must make a written request to the Planning Department via email or personal mail at the address noted below. Appeals: If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, if one is held, or make written submissions to the County of Frontenac in respect of the proposed plan of subdivision before the approval authority gives or refuses to give approval to the draft plan of subdivision, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of the County of Frontenac to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, if one is held, or make written submissions to County of Frontenac in respect of the proposed plan of subdivision before the approval authority gives or refuses to give approval to the draft plan of subdivision, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Please be advised that amendments to the Planning Act that came into effect on September 3, 2019 limiting third party appeals of plan of subdivision/condominium decisions including appeals from members of the public. Additional Information: Additional information relating to the proposed draft plan of subdivision application may be obtained from the County of Frontenac by contacting Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning, at (613)-548-9400 ext. 351 or planning@frontenaccounty.ca during regular business hours. The County Administrative Offices are closed to the public in response to COVID-19; staff remain available via email and phone during this time. Notice of Collection: Personal information collected as a result of this public meeting is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA), the Planning Act, and all other relevant legislation, and will be used to assist in making a decision on this matter. All personal information (as defined by MFIPPA), including (but not limited to) names, addresses, opinions and comments collected will be made available for public disclosure to members of the public, at the meeting, through requests, and through the website of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac. Questions regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of this personal information may be directed to the Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk, 2069 Battersea Rd. Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 at jamini@frontenaccounty.ca. Dated at Kingston, Ontario this 28th day of May, 2020. Megan Rueckwald Manager of Community Planning County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 Attachment: Draft Plan of Subdivision – Concept Plan

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 19 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

249.05 209.97

8.89

6.0m

WETLAND AREA

1.04 ha

161.03

216.87

1.13 ha

20 76.00

STREET A 76.02

1.76 ha

2.40 ha

68.35

81.86

0.1

76.00

.99

0.80 ha

111.03

143.55

164.51

161.33

1.03 ha

1 .3

1.25 ha

95.67

0.61 ha

62.90

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

1.27 ha

0 9. 11

164.94

76.02

0.62 ha 237.23

20.0m

76.00

AGRICULTURAL LANDS

30m SETBACK

.0m

1.00 ha

140.75

134.93

200 .63

149.99

6.0m

112.01

0.60 ha

0.61 ha 92.21

0.61 ha

25 0.61 ha 0

50m

250m

99.20

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

68.23 58.79

METRIC

0.61 ha

DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

98.68

59.04 BLOCK 33

74.05 123.77

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

24 6.0m

74.05

10 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

68.11

64.90

100.07

84.67

99.98

80.17

87.67 100.07

5.02

A=52.82

32.32

59.64

NEIGHBOUR LOT ADDITION

96.42

48.67

PUBLIC LIBRARY

105.22

69.28

63.6

0.60 ha

BLOCK 32

0.62 ha

71.22 6.0m

92.05

264.14

0.61 ha

68.66

75.95

27 0.60 ha

86.92

EXISTING BUILDING

87.51

6 68.83

69.08

0.61 ha

280.24

91.57

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7P 2X8 T:613.634.9009 F:888.884.9392

90.39 3.0m

66.62

0.60 ha

0.62 ha

3.0m

66.53 3.0m

3.0m

29 3.0m

3.0m

90.37

88.95 68.80 3.0m

66.86

STREET A

89.05

0.60 ha

30 6.0m

279.38

6.0m WIDE PARK BLOCK

138.51

0.61 ha

20.0m 91.78

92.75

31 0.68 ha

5 47.5

92.87

2 0.81 ha .9

110.86 38.48

33.93

92.75 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

1 181.14

NAG

33.25

AI DR

PART 2 13R-20835 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

3.41 ha E EAS

URBAN COMMERCIAL

64.67

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

10.00

0.61 ha

75.27

65.72

8 10

URBAN COMMERCIAL 42.67

54.50

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 20 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury Subdivision Zoning By-law Amendment Draft Plan of Subdivision

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 21 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Prepared for: 2628100 Ontario Inc. Prepared by:

Fotenn Planning + Design The Woolen Mill 6 Cataraqui Street, Suite 108 Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7 T 613.542.5454 fotenn.com April 06, 2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 22 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 1.1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 1.2 Development Application………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 2.0 Surrounding Area and Site Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2.1

Overview of Draft Plan of Subdivision …………………………………………………………………………………………. 5

3.0 Public Consultation Strategy ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4.0 Supporting Studies …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 4.1

Archaeological Assessment ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8

4.2

Environmental Impact Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8

4.3

Hydrogeological Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8

4.4

Terrain Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

4.5

Preliminary Stormwater Management Report …………………………………………………………………………….. 10

4.6

Traffic Impact Study ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

5.0 Policy & Regulatory Review ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 5.1

Planning Act…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12

5.2

Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13

5.3

Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20

5.4

County of Frontenac Official Plan …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22

5.5

Township of South Frontenac Official Plan ………………………………………………………………………………… 25

6.0 Current & Proposed Zoning ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 32 6.1

Minimum Lot Area ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34

6.2

Minimum Lot Frontage ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 34

7.0 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 35 8.0 Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 36

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 23 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction Fotenn Planning + Design has been retained by 2628100 Ontario Inc. to prepare a Planning Demonstration Report in support of an application for Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision for the lands located at Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2, former Township of Storrington, in the Geographic Township of South Frontenac. The County of Frontenac Official Plan dated January 11, 2016, the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan dated November 2014 and the Township’s Comprehensive Zoning By-Law #2003-75 dated May 2003, provide policy direction and regulate the development of the subject property. The submitted zoning by-law amendment application proposes a site-specific zoning by-law amendment to the “UR1” zone. The amendment seeks to permit the Draft Plan of Subdivision, dated November 2019, to subdivide the 31.66-hectare parcel into lots and blocks, including 31 residential lots, 1 parkland block, and 1 block to be added to an adjacent property as a lot addition. The subject property has frontage on Battersea Road and is located within the designated Hamlet of Sunbury. A pre-application meeting was held with staff on January 22, 2020 which identified the application requirements. Accordingly, the following are submitted in support of the application: • Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation, dated January 2011; • Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated July 3, 2013; • Addendum to Environmental Site Assessment, prepared by Ecological Services, dated February 14, 2019; • Hydrogeological Study, Prepared by BluMetric Environmental, dated August 2019; • Terrain Analysis, Prepared by XCG Environmental Engineers & Scientists, dated January 18, 2013; • Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November, 2019; • Draft Plan of Subdivision, Prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., dated November 2019; • Traffic Impact Study, prepared by GHD, dated March 11, 2020; • Completed application forms for Zoning By-Law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision; • Application fees; and • This Planning Demonstration Report.

1.2 Development Application The subject site is designated ‘Settlement’ in the County of Frontenac’s Official Plan Schedule ‘A’ – Land Use, ‘Settlement Area Boundary’ in the Township of South Frontenac’s Official Plan Schedule ‘A’ - Land Use and zoned Urban Residential – First Density Zone (UR1) in the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75. An application for a zoning by-law amendment is required to permit the redevelopment of the site. An application for Draft Plan of Subdivision is proposed to create lots and blocks including 31 single family residential lots, 1 parkland block, and a lot addition to a neighbouring residential lot. and a new municipal street with a single connection to Battersea Road. Supporting technical studies, including an Environmental Impact Study, a Hydrogeological Study, a Terrain Analysis, a Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment, and a Preliminary Stormwater Management Report have evaluated the technical aspects of the proposed development. These studies support the proposal and describe the technical needs and requirements of the proposed development. The purpose of this report is to assess the appropriateness of the proposed development in the context of the surrounding area and the policy and regulatory framework applicable to the subject site. It is our opinion that the proposed development is consistent with the land use policies and strategic direction for the subject lands and that it represents an appropriate form of development.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 24 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2.0 SURROUNDING AREA AND SITE CONTEXT

The subject site is a 31.66 hectare parcel of vacant land located in the Hamlet of Sunbury, approximately 13 kilometres north of the City of Kingston. The site has approximately 871.99m of frontage along the western side of Battersea road. The site has historically been used for agriculture purposes, most recently being managed for row crops including soybean and potatoes in 2018. The draft plan of subdivision proposes 31 lots with lots sizes ranging from 0.61 hectares (1.5 acres) to 3.41 hectares (8.42 acres). The proposed development includes a 0.04hectare parkland connection to Gerald Ball Memorial Park and a 0.19 hectare lot addition to be added to a neighbouring residential lot. Access to the proposed subdivision will be provided from a single roadway approximately 1.2km in length with a cul-de-sac at the terminus. The proposed road will connect to an existing intersection between Battersea Road and Sunbury Road. Vehicular access to the site is available via Battersea Road, which forms part of County Road 12. Battersea Road extends southwards to Highway 401 and ultimately connects to Kingston, making it a major arterial route in the Township. The surrounding area is predominately comprised of single-detached residential dwelling, ranging from one to two storey’s in height, with sporadic instances of commercial development along Battersea Road. The north of the site is bounded by existing residential dwellings and agriculture lands. To the East of the site is existing residential dwellings, agriculture lands, and the existing amenities along Battersea road, including the Storrington District Fire Department, the Kingston Frontenac Public Library, Ormbee’s Mercantile, and Boulton Septic Larmon. To the South of the site are existing residential dwellings and the Sunbury General Store along Moreland Dixon Road Road and agriculture lands and Gerald Ball Memorial Park to the West (Figure 1). The following uses are located in proximity to the subject site: North: Agricultural/residential East: Residential/Sunbury commercial strip/agricultural South: Residential West: Agricultural/Gerald Ball Memorial Park

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 25 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Figure 1: Subject Property and Surrounding Area Context

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 26 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5 2.1

Overview of Draft Plan of Subdivision

The Draft Plan of Subdivision (the “Draft Plan”) divides the subject lands into 33 lots and blocks, including 31 residential lots, 1 parkland block (Block 32), and 1 block to be added to an adjacent property as a lot addition (Block 33). Each of the blocks is organized around a single proposed roadway which connects to an existing intersection of Sunbury Road and Battersea Road. The typical residential lot area is 0.61ha, with the smallest lot area being 0.6ha (Lots 4,5,8,11, and 27) and the largest lot area being 3.41 ha (Lot 1). The proposed parkland block (Block 32) will be approximately 0.04ha. This will formally connect Battersea Road through the new development to Gerald Ball Memorial Park. The table below provides an overview of the proposed land lots and blocks. The Draft Plan is provided below in Figure 2.

Land Use

Lot & Blocks

Area

Units

Density

Single Family Detached

1-31

28.79 ha

1.08 units/ha

Streets & Reserves

Municipal Right of Way

2.64 ha

Parkland

Block 32

0.04 ha

Neighbour Lot Addition

Block 33

0.19 ha 31

0.98 units/ha

Total Site Area

31.66+ ha

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 27 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Figure 2 Draft Plan of Subdivision (Source: Forefront Engineering)

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 28 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

3.0 PUBLIC CONSULTATION STRATEGY

The applicant and development team propose the following strategy to consult with the public with respect to the subject applications in accordance with Ontario Regulation 544/06. Public Open House It is proposed to host a public open house within 1-2 months of the subject applications being deemed complete by County and Township staff. The open house will provide the opportunity to provide information to the public regarding the proposed development and collect feedback on the proposal and discuss any comments or concerns. The public open house will be held at a venue either within the Hamlet of Sunbury or as near as possible. Statutory Public Meetings Two statutory public meetings are required for the subject applications. A statutory public meeting for the Zoning Amendment application will be held at the Township level, while a statutory public meeting for the application for Draft Plan of Subdivision will be held at the County level. We recommend that the statutory public meetings be held following the issuance of technical comments by planning staff and review agencies. This would allow staff to better address the comments and questions from Committee members and the public as they will have had the opportunity to review the applications in detail with other review agencies. This proposed timing would also ensure that the applicant is aware of the technical review comments from staff and review agencies. Additional Open House The applicant is proposing the possibility of an additional open house following the statutory public meetings and prior to staff recommendations. The additional open house is intended to communicate to the public regarding any potential changes to the proposed development, should substantial changes to the applications be required as a result of the technical review or other comments recieved. The need for an additional open house will be further determined as the application progresses, in consultation with County and Township staff.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 29 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

4.0 SUPPORTING STUDIES

At the pre-application meeting, County of Frontenac and Township of South Frontenac staff identified that the following studies were necessary to support the proposed zoning by-law amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision.

4.1

Archaeological Assessment

A combined Stage 1 and 2 archaeological assessment report was prepared by Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation dated January, 2011. The work discussed in this report includes a review of the historical context of the subject property to assess any potential for archaeological resources that may be present on the site. The Stage 1 assessment determined that the sections of Lots 25 and 26 intended for development have had little use historically. The Stage 1 report indicated a low to moderate potential for the presence of pre-contact archaeological resources due to the property’s proximity to a pre-existing waterway and past archaeological documentation of aboriginal use of the area. These findings necessitated the Stage 2 assessment. Stage 2 work involved field walking in 5 metre transects, as well as shovel testing on a 5m grid in the wooded areas. Aside from a small artifact scatter in the south portion of the study area, the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment resulted in no indication of significant archaeological remains within the proposed development area. The author therefore recommends clearing the site of archaeological concern.

4.2

Environmental Impact Assessment

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was prepared by Ecological Services dated July 2, 2013. An addendum to the report, dated February 14, 2019 was prepared to provide an update to the original EIA to reflect the current conditions of the subject lands. This report assessed the natural features on the property to determine significance in accordance with provincial and municipal legislation. The work included site visits and analysis of aerial photography. Conclusions of the assessment include: • No species at risk within the subject property due to lack of good habitat. • There are no significant wetlands on site. • There is a provincially significant wetland located about 80m from the northwest corner of the property. No negative impacts to the features and functions of this wetland are expected from the development as there are only 3 lots within 120m, and they are proposed to be setback a minimum of 80m. There is also intervening woodland, farmland, and a farm access road between the subject property and the provincially significant wetland that are considered a sufficient buffer to prevent potential negative impacts. • The subject property does not contain any significant woodlands. Existing woodland is not of significant size, habitat, proximity to a significant natural heritage feature, linkage, groundwater discharge area, or diversity to be considered significant in the context of provincial or municipal regulations. It is the opinion of the report author that development of the remaining woodlands will not constitute negative impact if tree clearing for the purposes of development take place outside of the bird breeding season. • There are no valleylands in association with this development. • There are no Area’s of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) within 120m of the proposed development. • There were no significant wildlife habitats noted in the 2013 report. The 2018 addendum revealed the presence of Wood Thrush in the cutover areas of the woodland. These birds were categorized as a Special Concern species in 2014, which makes these areas potential significant wildlife habitat. It is the report author’s opinion that development in this area would not unduly hinder the ability of the Wood Thrush to breed in this area if forest clearing for the purpose of development takes place outside the breeding season (May to early August). • In 2013 the presence of fish were observed in a small isolated wetland pond. Since 2013 this region has experienced two severe droughts, which would have either dried up the pond or greatly reduced the water level. As such, no fish were observed in 2018.

4.3

Hydrogeological Assessment

An extensive study was undertaken by BluMetric Environmental, dated August 2019, to assess the suitability of the property to accommodate the proposed residential development using individual wells and septic systems. This study builds upon an existing Terrain Analysis, conducted by XCG Environmental Engineers and Scientists

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 30 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

9 (XCG) in 2011, which indicated marginal aquifer yields for some of the test wells during previous site investigations. This study looks to address the issues previously identified (XCG, 2011), and assess the ability for groundwater sources to provide adequate quantities of potable water for residential supply. The 2019 report summarizes the results of an investigation of the geology, physiography and the study of groundwater occurrence, quantity and quality available. The study was completed by reviewing pertinent literature and maps, and by conducting on-site field investigations including a site visit and constant discharge pumping tests to evaluate potential water supplies and possible well interference. The work program included communication with existing homeowners and the observation of existing domestic wells during aquifer testing. The previous hydrogeological work (XCG, 2011) on the property was discussed with the Peer Reviewer prior to commencing the new study. For this study, constant discharge pumping tests were completed on 6 test wells constructed to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Regulation 903 standards to determine water quality, aquifer characteristics and potential well interference. Results from each of the constant discharge pumping tests indicate that 5 of the test wells provide adequate amounts of water while one did not. The majority of recommended pumping rates were reported in excess of the MECP minimum of 13.7 litres/minute. Analysis of the drawdown and recovery data indicated that the five test wells can provide adequate supply for the proposed development type. The report finds that the large lot sizes (equal or greater than 0.6ha) and low development density mitigates the potential for well interference between properties. No adverse well interference issues are anticipated for the proposed development based on the analysis of data provided from neighbouring observation wells. Water quality from on-site sampling indicated that the overall quality was good, however some elevated operational and aesthetic parameters were present, including elevated hardness levels, a higher concentration of iron, TDS and Dissolved Organic Carbon, all of which is not atypical for wells in this area. The concentrations are well within treatable limits. Existing levels of nitrates in the groundwater are <1.3mg/L. Given the historical land use of the subject property was agriculture fields a presence of nitrates was expected, however the values are within the D5-4 requirements of <10mg/L. It is recommended that the quality of water from the supply wells be monitored, and treated as necessary, and that appropriate disinfection treatment of raw water is included in any future wells supplying drinking water. The report recommends that well owners should complete regular well inspections to ensure the well is consistently maintained to meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg) 903, and municipal requirements. The previous investigation found potential water quality issues and water quantity issues requiring further assessment (XCG, 2011). These issues were addressed by the recommendation to install deeper wells cased and sealed into the sandstone bedrock. Based on the results, the sandstone bedrock aquifer is characterized by suitable quantity and quality. To obtain the best well water quality it is recommended that water wells not exceed a depth of 30m. Further analysis of the results provided in the Terrain study (XCG, 2011) leads to the recommendation for the construction of fully raised leaching bed systems.

4.4

Terrain Analysis

A terrain analysis was conducted for the subject property by XCG Consultants Ltd. dated January 18, 2013. A terrain analysis report indicating soil suitability and adequate area for septic systems is required by the Township of South Frontenac to determine the feasibility of providing wastewater disposal to the proposed new development. To conduct the terrain analysis portion of this investigation the authors conducted field investigations, including test pit advancements, grain size distribution testing for soil characterization and soil percolation testing. In 2010, a total of 31 test pit locations were selected based on the proposed lot layout to provide representative results across the property. The soil conditions are consistent across the site with an overlying organic (topsoil) layer typically 0.2m thick, underlain by a silty or sandy clay deposit to the bedrock. At the top of the ridge on the site, the soil depth is less with just a shallow organic layer over the limestone bedrock.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 31 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

10 The results of the grain size analysis indicate that soil conditions across the site are reasonably consistent, made up primarily of mixtures of silt and clay with some sand and traces of gravel. Two percolation tests were performed in two distinct areas on the property. The first test had a rate of 50 minutes/centimetre, while the second test had a rate of <10 minutes/centimetre. These results concluded that no further percolation testing was required and indicated that the native soils at the site are not acceptable for the installation of in-ground Class 4 septic systems. As such, raised bed systems with suitable imported soil for the septic bed would be required. The report identifies that the subject property will support a maximum of 38 lots. Therefore, the proposed development of 31 residential lots is feasible in terms of a water quality impact assessment. The proposed lots will support a leaching bed, a contingency bed area, septic tank and associated pumping chamber, and a 230m2 house. Either a filter bed or absorption trench system may be used. The site is primarily made up of mixtures of silt and clay with some sand and traces of gravel, and have a percolation rate which equals or exceeds the 50 centimetre/minute requirement, resulting in the need for raised Class 4 septic systems with suitable imported soil for the septic bed. Based on the results of the hydrogeological assessment, previous terrain analysis, and a review of the existing data, municipal servicing for the proposed development is impractical. The area is rural and individual water and septic services are utilized on properties in the vicinity of the subject property. The test wells installed as part of this report indicate suitable quantity and water quality to support the proposed development and soils were such that they can accommodate septic systems.

4.5

Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

A Stormwater Management Report has been completed by Forefront Engineering, dated November 27, 2019. The report is intended to examine the effects of the proposed development on stormwater runoff conditions on the site. Both existing and post-construction conditions are considered, and a stormwater management design is presented that will maintain pre-development conditions on site after development. Based on the results of the stormwater analysis, the following conclusions and recommendations regarding the impact of the proposed development are proposed: / Post-development peak flow will be greater than pre-development peak flow due to the increase in impermeable surfaces. / The proposed stormwater management design provides the required storage and outlet control to maintain post-development flows at pre-development flow rates for all storm events up to and including a 100-year storm event. / Minor storm drainage systems will be designed for the 5 year design event in accordance with the Township standards. / The low-lying area directly to the west of the culvert provides storage for flooding during the major storm events. This area is to be maintained as is, and it is recommended that a drainage easement be provided to the Township. The high-water line for the low-lying area is approximately 124.29m. / No quantity control is expected to be required at downstream outlets, since post development peak flows will be maintained at or below pre-development levels. / It is recommended that culverts be a minimum of 400mm in diameter. / The enhanced grass swale will require routine periodic maintenance including weed control, grass cutting and trash removal several times per year. Removal of accumulated sediment, and replacement of the rock check dams will be required when clogging occurs. The grass should be maintained at minimum height of 100 mm to promote quality control. Removal of sediment should be completed on an annual basis. / Silt fencing is to be provided at all side slopes and down gradient locations to ensure sediment and erosion control during construction. Other control devices such as straw bales will also be provided where drainage is concentrated.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 32 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

11 4.6

Traffic Impact Study

A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by GHD in support of the proposed development. The study concluded that the proposed development would add a low number of trips to the area roadways. The site is projected to generate 27 new trips during the AM peak hour and 33 new trips during the PM peak house. Based on the results of the capacity analysis for 2021 and 2026 future conditions, it was determined that the area roadways can adequately accommodate the site traffic generated as a result of the proposed development.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 33 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5.0 POLICY & REGULATORY REVIEW

This section provides an overview of the key land use policies that affect the property and demonstrates how the proposal conforms to the land use objectives applicable to this site.

5.1

Planning Act

In considering an application for subdivision, the approving body must evaluate the merits of the proposal against Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act. The criteria relating to the proposed draft plan of subdivision are below in

italics.

51 (24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality to the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in section 2; The proposed subdivision has regard for matters of provincial interest found in Section 2 as the proposed development will not negatively impact natural, agricultural or cultural heritage resources and represents orderly development on lands within an existing settlement area. The proposed subdivision will contribute to the range of housing options in the hamlet of Sunbury and provides a conceptual site layout that is well-designed and will not create challenges in terms of public health and safety. Recommendations from the supporting studies prepared in support of the subject applications will further ensure that provincial interests are satisfied.

a) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;

The proposed subdivision is not premature as it efficiently utilizes an under-utilized parcel for an efficient residential development within the settlement area boundary, in accordance with the public interest.

b) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of subdivision, if any; Conformity with the Official Plan is discussed below. The proposal conforms to the Official Plans of the County and the Township.

c) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided; The proposed subdivision represents the rounding out of an existing settlement area which would see the creation of 31 additional residential lots in an area intended for residential use. Appropriate performance standards will be applied to the new lots and blocks through the proposed zoning by-law amendment. Technical studies have shown that the land is suited to individual on-site servicing in this area.

d) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them; The subject lands have frontage on Battersea Road, an existing municipal road. The establishment of an additional municipal roadway will provide access throughout the proposed development. A Traffic Impact Study determined that the existing road network has sufficient capacity to serve the increased traffic volume generated as a result of the proposed development. e) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots; The proposed lots are generally regular in shape. Given the unique configuration of the subject lands, irregular shaped lots are required in some portions of the site, however these lots seamlessly integrate within the proposed lot orientation to form an efficient modified grid layout. Performance standards for the proposed lots will be further described through the proposed zoning by-law amendment.

the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the land proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land;

All buildings and structures on the proposed parcels will be subject to the provisions of the zoning by-law, as amended. There are no known restrictions on adjoining lands. Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 34 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

13 g) conservation of natural resources and flood control; There is a watercourse located on the southern portion of the site. An area of constrained open space is proposed through Block 107 to provide setbacks from the existing watercourse. Appropriate setbacks will be further defined through the proposed zoning amendment.

h) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services; The subject site is not currently serviced by municipal water and sewer. Based on the findings of a hydrogeological assessment (BluMetric, 2019), the use of individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services is considered the most financially viable option at the time given the low density of the proposed development at 1.08 units per net hectare, and the high infrastructure cost associated with low density land development.

the adequacy of school sites;

The proposed subdivision represents the rounding out of an existing settlement area. It is anticipated that local school boards will be circulated on the development applications.

the area of land, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;

k) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the available supply, means of supply, efficient use and conservation of energy; and, The subdivision will provide 31 residential lots in an area predominated by residential use. The proposed development will make efficient use of available land within the settlement area. The proposed subdivision has proper regard for the criteria found in section 51 (24) of the Planning Act.

5.2

Provincial Policy Statement (2014)

The 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides high-level land use policy direction on matters of provincial interest as they relate to land use planning in Ontario municipalities. Decisions of municipal councils must be consistent with the PPS, which provides direction for issues such as the efficient use of land and infrastructure, the protection of natural and cultural heritage resources, maintaining a housing stock that appropriately addresses the demographic and economic diversity of households, encouraging economic development and preserving natural resources for their future use. In relation to the proposed development, the 2014 PPS includes the following considerations (with policies cited in italics): Section 1.0: Building Strong Healthy Communities Section 1 of the PPS provides direction for the creation of strong and healthy communities. The efficient use of land is supported through sustainable development patterns which consider the needs of communities, the environment, public health and safety, and economic growth. This section will address those policies which are relevant to the proposed development.

Section 1.1.1 - Healthy, liveable and safe communities are sustained by: a) promoting efficient development and land use patterns which sustain the financial well-being of the Province and municipalities over the long term; The proposed development provides an efficient use of the currently under-utilized subject lands located within the Hamlet of Sunbury. Residential lots will be serviced by individual, on-site services that will not burden the municipality. The proposed road will be built at the expense of the developer and will adhere to municipal

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 35 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

14 standards. The new road will provide for access by emergency services and is logically connected to the intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road and will offer a connection to Gerald Ball Memorial Park.

b) accommodating an appropriate range and mix of residential (including second units, affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs; The proposed development provides residential lots that contribute to the range and mix of residential uses available in the Township, and will better connect the core of the Hamlet with Gerald Ball Memorial Park.

c) avoiding development and land use patterns which may cause environmental or public health and safety concerns; There have been significant studies undertaken to evaluate the proposed development in regards of any potential environmental or health and safety impacts, including an Environment Impact Statement, and Hydrogeological Study. It has been demonstrated through such works that with proper mitigation measures taken there will be no significant impacts in this regard.

d) avoiding development and land use patterns that would prevent the efficient expansion of settlement areas in those areas which are adjacent or close to settlement areas; The development is situated within the Sunbury Settlement Area. This settlement area is served by individual private services and the proposed development will be serviced similarly. While a zoning by-law amendment has been requested in terms of minimum lot area and minimum frontage requirements, the proposed development is consistent with recent developments in the area. As will be discussed further below, the development is consistent with the intent of OP policies for settlement areas. The development therefore would not prevent the efficient expansion of settlement areas as it represents the same compatible form of development that is found within the hamlet.

e) promoting cost-effective development patterns and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs; The subject property is located within the Sunbury Settlement Area as designated both Official Plans. Servicing will be dealt with on a site-by-site basis and costs will not be borne by the municipality in this regard. The land consumed by this development seeks relief from the minimum lot size.

improving accessibility for persons with disabilities and older persons by identifying, preventing and removing land use barriers which restrict their full participation in society; g) ensuring that necessary infrastructure, electricity generation facilities and transmission and distribution systems, and public service facilities are or will be available to meet current and projected needs; and

Item f and g are not particularly addressed by this development. However, access to Gerald Ball Memorial Park will be improved from the hamlet.

h) promoting development and land use patterns that conserve biodiversity and consider the impacts of a changing climate. The proposed development is located within the Sunbury Settlement Area. Development of these lands will more efficiently use available land and infrastructure within the settlement boundary and preserves the biodiversity of the rural lands surrounding the hamlet. Trees and other existing vegetation are planned to be preserved where possible.

Section 1.1.3.1 – Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development, and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. The subject site is located within a designated settlement area. The proposed development will result in 31 new residential units which will contribute to the vitality and development of the settlement area.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 36 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

15 Section 1.1.3.2 – Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a) densities and a mix of land uses which:

efficiently use land and resources;
are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion;
minimize negative impacts to air quality and climate change, and promote energy efficiency;
support active transportation;
are transit-supportive, where transit is planned, exists or may be developed; and,
are freight-supportive; The proposed development achieves a density of approximately 1.08 units per net hectare. The subject lands currently represent an under-utilized site within the settlement area. Development of these lands will efficiently use available land and infrastructure within the settlement boundary. The development of the subject lands will emphasize the promotion of environmental conservation through the retention of mature vegetation where feasible. The subject lands are located within a designated hamlet, providing active transportation opportunities to a variety of nearby amenities including the Kingston Frontenac Public Library, businesses within the Sunbury, and a parkland connection to Gerald Ball Memorial Park. Development is at the core of the Hamlet and will be walkable to all existing amenities.

b) a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3, where this can be accommodated. The provisions of Section 1.1.3.3 are discussed below.

Section 1.1.3.3 – Planning authorities shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs. The proposed development will contribute to intensifying the Hamlet of Sunbury with development that is appropriate on private services. Growth and intensification are generally encouraged in settlement areas as directed by both the Township of South Frontenac’s Official Plan and the County of Frontenac’s Official Plan. The relevant policies of the Township and County’s Official Plan are further discussed below. The new road will be built at the expense of the developer and is logical with respect to the existing street network.

Section 1.1.3.4 – Appropriate development standards should be promoted which facilitate intensification, redevelopment and compact form, while avoiding or mitigating risks to public health and safety. The proposed development represents the intensification of generally under-utilized lands. The design of the subject site will allow for increased residential density in a compact form which is sensitive to natural features and environmental constraints. With the application of proper mitigation measures provided through the completion of numerous studies, including an Environmental Impact Assessment and Hydrogeological Assessment, there are no anticipated impacts with regards to public health and safety.

Section 1.1.3.6 – New development taking place in designated growth areas should occur adjacent to the existing built-up area and shall have a compact form, mix of uses and densities that allow for the efficient use of land, infrastructure and public service facilities. The proposed development proposes residential uses and works to further intensify the existing settlement area. Intensification of under-utilized lands at this location will allow for a more efficient use of land within the settlement boundary and will efficiently use existing municipal infrastructure and public service facilities.

Section 1.1.4.1 - Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas should be supported by: a) building upon rural character, and leveraging rural amenities and assets; b) promoting regeneration, including the redevelopment of brownfield sites; c) accommodating an appropriate range and mix of housing in rural settlement areas; Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 37 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

16 d) encouraging the conservation and redevelopment of existing rural housing stock on rural lands; e) using rural infrastructure and public service facilities efficiently; f) promoting diversification of the economic base and employment opportunities through goods and services, including value-added products and the sustainable management or use of resources; g) providing opportunities for sustainable and diversified tourism, including leveraging historical, cultural, and natural assets; h) conserving biodiversity and considering the ecological benefits provided by nature; and i) providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas, in accordance with policy 2.3. The Draft Plan requests relief from the minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage requirements. There are no official plan amendments requested related to setback or building footprint, and therefore the proposed uses will generally reflect the typical rural residential character intended for this area. The proposed development contributes to the range and mix of housing within the Hamlet of Sunbury. The proposed road is logical with respect to the existing street pattern. The location of the proposed development within the Sunbury Settlement Area will contribute to the intensification of the Hamlet, makes use of existing infrastructure, and conserves the biodiversity of the rural lands surrounding the Hamlet.

Section 1.1.4.2 - In rural areas, rural settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. The proposed development is located within the Sunbury Settlement Area as designated in both Official Plan’s. Redevelopment and intensification of these lands will more efficiently use available land and infrastructure within the settlement boundary.

Section 1.1.4.3 - When directing development in rural settlement areas in accordance with policy 1.1.3, planning authorities shall give consideration to rural characteristics, the scale of development and the provision of appropriate service levels. The Draft Plan requests relief from the minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage requirements, and is consistent with development in the area. The scale of the proposed development maintains the existing rural character within the Hamlet. The completion of an extensive hydrogeological assessment determined private water and wastewater servicing to be the preferred and recommended service option for the proposed development.

Section 1.4.3 – Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing types and densities to meet projected requirements of current and future residents of the regional market area by: a) establishing and implementing minimum targets for the provision of housing which is affordable to low and moderate income households. However, where planning is conducted by an upper-tier municipality, the upper-tier municipality in consultation with the lower-tier municipalities may identify a higher target(s) which shall represent the minimum target(s) for these lower-tier municipalities; b) permitting and facilitating: i. all forms of housing required to meet the social, health and wellbeing requirements of current and future residents, including special needs requirements; and ii. all forms of residential intensification, including second units, and redevelopment in accordance with policy 1.1.3.3; c) directing the development of new housing towards locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs; d) promoting densities for new housing which efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure and public service facilities, and support the use of active transportation and transit in areas where it exists or is to be developed; and e) establishing development standards for residential intensification, redevelopment and new residential development which minimize the cost of housing and facilitate compact form, while maintaining appropriate levels of public health and safety.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 38 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

17 The proposed development represents appropriate intensification of an under-utilized site within the settlement boundary. The development will provide 31 additional residential units within the settlement boundary. The proposed development represents an efficient land use within the settlement boundary, which can be supported by existing municipal infrastructure. The residential lots are proposed to be serviced privately, as per the recommendations of an extensive hydrogeological study.

Section 1.5.1 – Healthy, active communities should be promoted by: a) planning public streets, spaces and facilities to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social interaction and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity; b) planning and providing for a full range and equitable distribution of publicly-accessible built and natural settings for recreation, including facilities, parklands, public spaces, open space areas, trails and linkages, and, where practical, water-based resources; c) providing opportunities for public access to shorelines; and d) recognizing provincial parks, conservation reserves, and other protected areas, and minimizing negative impacts on these areas. The proposed development will incorporate a connection to Gerald Ball Memorial Park. This connection will better connect the park with the commercial area of the hamlet.

Section 1.6.2 – Planning authorities should promote green infrastructure to complement infrastructure. The design of the redevelopment promotes environmental conservation and sustainable development practices. This is done through the retention of mature vegetation where feasible, the planting of native plant species, and providing appropriate control of stormwater quality.

Section 1.6.6.1 - Planning for sewage and water services shall: a) accommodate forecasted growth in a manner that promotes the efficient use and optimization of existing:

municipal sewage services and municipal water services; and
private communal sewage services and private communal water services, where municipal sewage services and municipal water services are not available or feasible; b) ensure that these systems are provided in a manner that:
can be sustained by the water resources upon which such services rely;
prepares for the impacts of a changing climate;
is feasible and financially viable over their lifecycle; and
protects human health and safety, and the natural environment; c) promote water conservation and water use efficiency; d) integrate servicing and land use considerations at all stages of the planning process; and e) be in accordance with the servicing hierarchy outlined through policies 1.6.6.2, 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4 and 1.6.6.5. For clarity, where municipal sewage services and municipal water services are not available, planned or feasible, planning authorities have the ability to consider the use of the servicing options set out through policies 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4, and 1.6.6.5 provided that the specified conditions are met. There are currently no municipal sewage or water services available within 11km of the subject property. Based on the findings of an extensive hydrogeological study (BluMetric, 2019), the proposed development will use individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services. This form of servicing was determined to be suitable based on the low density of the proposed development at 1.08 units per net hectare, and the high infrastructure cost associated with low density land development. This area is rural, and individual water and septic services are utilized on properties in the vicinity of the subject property. The findings of the hydrogeological study indicate that there is an adequate quantity and quality of water based on the Ontario Ministry of the Environment’s Drinking Water Standards, Objectives and Guidelines (ODWSOG) criteria. The use of individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services is considered the most financially viable option at the time. With proper mitigation measures taken there are no anticipated impacts in regards to human health and safety and the natural environment.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 39 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

18 Section 1.6.6.2 – Municipal sewage services and municipal water services are the preferred form of servicing for settlement areas. Intensification and redevelopment within settlement areas on existing municipal sewage services and municipal water services should be promoted, wherever feasible. The proposed development is located within the settlement area and proposes the use of private water and sewage. There are currently no municipal sewage or water services available within 13km of the subject development, thus the expansion of municipal services to service the subject lands would not be financially feasible.

Section 1.6.6.3 - Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services are not available, planned or feasible private communal sewage services and private communal water services are the preferred form of servicing for multiunit/lot development to support protection of the environment and minimize potential risks to human health and safety. Based on the findings of an extensive hydrogeological assessment (BluMetric, 2019), the use of individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services is considered the most financially viable option at the time given the low density of the proposed development at 1.08 units per net hectare, and the high infrastructure cost associated with low density land development.

Section 1.6.6.4 - Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services are not available, planned or feasible, individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services may be used provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. In settlement areas, individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services may be used for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development. The proposed development will use individual, on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services based on the recommendations provided from an extensive hydrogeological assessment (BluMetric, 2019). This report indicated that test wells on the subject property can provide adequate supply for the proposed development type, and no well interference issues are anticipated for the proposed development. The proposed development is suitable for private services since there is a low development density, and unit sizes are considered sufficient for placement of private servicing while causing minimal impact to the environment and maintaining the enjoyment of the setting.

Section 1.6.6.7 – Planning for stormwater management shall: a) minimize, or, where possible, prevent increases in contaminant loads; b) minimize changes in water balance and erosion; c) not increase risks to human health and safety and property damage; d) maximize the extent and function of vegetative and pervious surfaces; and e) promote stormwater management best practices, including stormwater attenuation and re-use, and low impact development. The proposed development proposes a low impact development type stormwater management control, including enhanced grass swales and filter strips, as per the recommendations of a Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (Forefront, 2019). Rock check dams and sub-surface drainage have been included in the design to help promote the treatment quality. With the recommended mitigation measures, no adverse impacts are anticipated in regards to human health and safety. Erosion and sediment control plans will be included during the detailed design submission.

Section 1.6.7.4 – A land use pattern, density and mix of uses should be promoted that minimize the length and number of vehicle trips and support current and future use of transit and active transportation. The scale of the proposed development maintains the existing rural character within the Hamlet. A parkland connection to Gerald Ball Memorial Park will better connect the park with the commercial area of the Hamlet. The proposed development is at the core of the hamlet and will be walkable to all existing amenities.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 40 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

19 Section 1.8.1 – Planning authorities shall support energy conservation and efficiency, improved air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change adaptation through land use and development patterns which: a) promote compact form and a structure of nodes and corridors; b) promote the use of active transportation and transit in and between residential, employment (including commercial and industrial) and institutional uses and other areas; c) focus major employment, commercial and other travel-intensive land uses on sites which are well served by transit where this exists or is to be developed, or designing these to facilitate the establishment of transit in the future; d) focus freight-intensive land uses to areas well served by major highways, airports, rail facilities and marine facilities; e) improve the mix of employment and housing uses to shorten commute journeys and decrease transportation congestion; f) promote design and orientation which:

maximizes energy efficiency and conservation, and considers the mitigating effects of vegetation; and
maximizes opportunities for the use of renewable energy systems and alternative energy systems; and g) maximize vegetation within settlement areas, where feasible. The proposed development represents a compact and efficient built form relative to the surrounding areas. The site is located along Battersea Road, a primary transportation corridor within the Hamlet. Pathway connections to surrounding parkland will improve connections between the newly proposed residential areas. The design of the proposed development is sensitive to environmental constraints and known ecological features. As much existing vegetation as is feasible will be maintained across the site. Section 2: Wise Use and Management of Resources Section 2 of the PPS contains policies that encourage the protection of natural heritage, water, agricultural, mineral and cultural heritage and archaeological resources. The proposed development is consistent with these policies as it: • Does not encroach on any areas of natural heritage significance and offers appropriate setbacks from a nearby Provincially Significant Wetland; • Is not expected to compromise local drinking water supplies; • Will implement stormwater management practices to minimize stormwater volumes; • Is not located on prime agricultural land; • Will not preclude or hinder the expansion or continued use of mineral mining operations, petroleum operations or mineral aggregate operations; and • Does not contain any significant archaeological resources as demonstrated through the completion of an archaeological assessment. Section 3: Protecting Public Health and Safety Section 3 of the PPS contains policies intended to reduce the potential for public cost or risk to Ontario’s residents from natural or human-made hazards. The proposed development is consistent with these policies as it: • Does not situate dwellings on lands impacted by flooding hazards or erosion hazards; and • Is not located on, abutting or adjacent to lands affected by mine hazards; oil, gas and salt hazards; or former mineral mining operations, mineral aggregate operations or petroleum resource operations. Based on this review of the PPS with respect to residential development in rural settlement areas, it is our opinion that the proposed low-density residential development is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 41 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

20 5.3

Provincial Policy Statement, 2020

In addition to the policies of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement, a review has been undertaken of the 2020 PPS, coming into effect May 1, 2020. The following is a review of the changes to the Provincial Policy Statement for policies applicable to the subject site. While the majority of policies have not been updated and the general intent remains the same, policies that have been updated are included below. Additional wording is underlined and words that have been removed are strikethrough. The following review focuses on addressing new policies.

1.1.1 Healthy, liveable and safe communities are sustained by: a) promoting efficient development and land use patterns which sustain the financial well-being of the Province and municipalities over the long term; b) accommodating an appropriate market-based range and mix of residential types (including singledetached, additional residential units, multi-unit housing, affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs; c) avoiding development and land use patterns which may cause environmental or public health and safety concerns; d) avoiding development and land use patterns that would prevent the efficient expansion of settlement areas in those areas which are adjacent or close to settlement areas; e) promoting the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit-supportive development, intensification and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs; f) improving accessibility for persons with disabilities and older persons by addressing land use barriers which restrict their full participation in society; g) ensuring that necessary infrastructure, electricity generation facilities and transmission and distribution systems, and public service facilities are or will be available to meet current and projected needs; and h) promoting development and land use patterns that conserve biodiversity and consider the impacts of a changing climate.; and i) preparing for the regional and local impacts of a changing climate. The proposed development will provide 31 new residential dwellings within the Hamlet of Sunbury. The proposal will have the result of redeveloping and intensifying the subject site, while utilizing existing municipal infrastructure. The proposal will result in a cost-effective development on the subject site. The site will be accommodated by private services.

Section 1.1.3.1 Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development, and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. The subject site is located within the Hamlet of Sunbury, a designated settlement area. The following new policy was added to Section 1.1.3.2

d) prepare for the impacts of a changing climate;

The development is within a designated settlement area, contributing to the existing concentrated development within the settlement. The built form is compact for a privately serviced development.

Section 1.1.3.3 – Planning authorities shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for transit-supportive development, accommodating a significant supply and range of housing options through intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs. The proposed development will contribute to intensifying the Hamlet of Sunbury with development that is appropriate on private services. Growth and intensification are generally encouraged in settlement areas as

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 42 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

21 directed by both the Township of South Frontenac’s Official Plan and the County of Frontenac’s Official Plan. The relevant policies of the Township and County’s Official Plan are further discussed below. The new road will be built at the expense of the developer and is logical with respect to the existing street network. The location of the proposed development within the Hamlet of Sunbury would support the presence of any future public transportation initiatives.

Section 1.1.3.6 – New development taking place in designated growth areas should occur adjacent to the existing built-up area and shall should have a compact form, mix of uses and densities that allow for the efficient use of land, infrastructure and public service facilities. The proposed development proposes residential uses and works to further intensify the existing settlement area. Intensification of under-utilized lands at this location will allow for a more efficient use of land within the settlement boundary and will efficiently use existing municipal infrastructure and public service facilities.

Section 1.4.3 – Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing types options and densities to meet projected requirements market- based needs of current and future residents of the regional market area by: a) establishing and implementing minimum targets for the provision of housing which is affordable to low and moderate income households. However, where planning is conducted by an upper-tier municipality and which aligns with applicable housing an homelessness plans. However, where planning is conducted by an upper-tier municipality, the upper-tier municipality in consultation with the lower-tier municipalities may identify a higher target(s) which shall represent the minimum target(s) for these lower-tier municipalities; b) permitting and facilitating: i. all forms of housing options required to meet the social, health, economic and wellbeing requirements of current and future residents, including special needs requirements and needs arising from demographic changes and employment opportunities; and ii. all forms types of residential intensification, including additional second residential units, and redevelopment in accordance with policy 1.1.3.3; c) directing the development of new housing towards locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs; d) promoting densities for new housing which efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure and public service facilities, and support the use of active transportation and transit in areas where it exists or is to be developed; and e) requiring transit-supportive development and prioritizing intensification, including potential air rights development, in proximity to transit, including corridors and stations; and f) establishing development standards for residential intensification, redevelopment and new residential development which minimize the cost of housing and facilitate compact form, while maintaining appropriate levels of public health and safety. The proposed development represents intensification of an under-utilized site within the settlement boundary. The development will provide 31 additional residential units within the settlement boundary. The proposed development represents an efficient land use within the settlement boundary, which can be supported by existing municipal infrastructure. The residential lots are proposed to be serviced privately, in accordance with the recommendations of an extensive hydrogeological study. Although there is currently no public transit service in the area, the proposed development will increase potential ridership numbers within the settlement area, should future transit opportunities be made available.

Section 1.6.6.2 – Municipal sewage services and municipal water services are the preferred form of servicing for settlement areas to support protection of the environment and minimize potential risks to human health and safety. Intensification and redevelopment within settlement areas on with existing municipal sewage services and municipal water services should be promoted intensification and redevelopment shall be promoted, wherever feasible to optimize the use of the services. The proposed development is located within the settlement area and proposes the use of individual, on-site water and sewage. There are currently no municipal sewage or water services available within 11km of the subject Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 43 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

22 development, thus the expansion of municipal services to service the subject lands would not be financially feasible. The completion of a hydrogeological report found that the proposed lot sizes would support private onsite services. There are no anticipated risks to public health and safety as a result of the proposed private servicing.

Section 1.6.6.7 – Planning for stormwater management shall: a) be integrated with planning for sewage and water services and ensure that systems are optimized, feasible and financially viable over the long term; b) minimize, or, where possible, prevent increases in contaminant loads; c) minimize changes in water balance and erosion and changes in water balance, and prepare for the impacts of a changing climate through the effective management of stormwater; d) not increase mitigate risks to human health, and safety and property damage and the environment; e) maximize the extent and function of vegetative and pervious surfaces; and f) promote stormwater management best practices, including stormwater attenuation and re-use, water conservation and efficiency, and low impact development. The proposed development proposes a low impact development type stormwater management control, including enhanced grass swales and filter strips, as per the recommendations of a Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (Forefront, 2019). Rock check dams and sub-surface drainage have been included in the design to help promote the treatment quality. With the recommended mitigation measures, no adverse impacts are anticipated in regards to human health and safety. Erosion and sediment control plans will be included during the detailed design submission.

Section 1.8.1 – Planning authorities shall support energy conservation and efficiency, improved air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and preparing for impacts of a changing climate change adaptation through land use and development patterns which: a) promote compact form and a structure of nodes and corridors; b) promote the use of active transportation and transit in and between residential, employment (including commercial and industrial) and institutional uses and other areas; c) focus major employment, commercial and other travel-intensive land uses on sites which are well served by transit where this exists or is to be developed, or designing these to facilitate the establishment of transit in the future; d) focus freight-intensive land uses to areas well served by major highways, airports, rail facilities and marine facilities; e) improve the mix of employment and housing uses to shorten commute journeys and decrease transportation congestion; f) promote design and orientation which maximizes energy efficiency and conservation, and considers the mitigating effects of vegetation; and g) encourage transit-supportive development and intensification to improve the mix of employment and housing uses to shorten commute journeys and decrease transportation congeation; h) promote design and orientation which maximizes opportunities for the use of renewable energy systems and alternative energy systems; and i) maximize vegetation within settlement areas, where feasible. The proposed development represents a compact built form relative to the surrounding areas. The site is located along Battersea Road, a primary transportation corridor within the Hamlet. Pathway connections to surrounding parkland will improve connections between the newly proposed residential areas. The design of the proposed development is sensitive to environmental constraints and known ecological features. As much existing vegetation as is feasible will be maintained across the site. It is our opinion that the development is consistent with the 2020 Provincial Policy Statement.

5.4

County of Frontenac Official Plan

The County of Frontenac Official Plan was adopted by County Council on October 29, 2014. It was approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in January 2016 and came into force as of February 2, 2016. As an

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 44 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

23 upper tier-municipality, the County of Frontenac OP details high-level goals, objectives and policies for the four constituent municipalities (the Townships of Frontenac Islands, South Frontenac, Central Frontenac, and North Frontenac). The Official Plan is intended to guide land use changes in the County over the next 20 years to 2034 by protecting and managing the natural environment, directing and influencing growth patterns and facilitating the vision of the County as expressed through its residents. The relevant policy considerations of the Official Plan are discussed below (with policies cited in italics). The following sections of the Official Plan will be addressed: • Section 3 – Growth Management • Section 4 – Community Building • Section 7 – Environmental Sustainability Section 3 – Growth Management The Growth Management section sets out policies that are intended to help guide new development (residential and non-residential) across Frontenac County. The policies are intended to manage change from a regional level. 3.2.2 Settlement Area Policies

Section 3.2.2.1: Based on its historic settlement pattern, Frontenac County has many villages and hamlets scattered throughout the region. Some of these villages have a mix of residential, commercial, and institutional uses, while other hamlets are primarily residential and small in size. Traditionally, these communities have developed as residential, social and commercial centres serving the surrounding agricultural, mining, or forestry community. While this traditional role will continue to be encouraged, it is also recognized that changes and improvements to transportation facilities over time have lessened the emphasis on hamlets as rural service centres and increased their role as residential settlements. The proposed residential development furthers the intent of the Official Plan to encourage residential settlements within designated settlement areas. The following general policies shall apply to the Settlement Areas which are identified on Schedule ‘A’ of this Plan:

Local Official Plans shall designate Settlement Areas and determine their boundaries. Efficient development patterns and road connections will be encouraged in Settlement Areas to optimize public services and to make the most efficient use of land and resources. Local Official Plans shall, where feasible, promote mixed use development in Settlement Areas including residential, commercial, institutional, parks, and employment areas.

The proposed development is within a designated Settlement Area and makes connections to existing roads, and further utilizes the existing resources within the settlement area. The proposed development will feature residential development, which further contributes to a range of uses within the Sunbury Settlement Area. Section 4 – Community Building

The Community Building section sets out policies that are intended to help ensure that the public infrastructure that ties the region together and is key to its sustainability can be maintained and possibly enhanced over the next twenty years. The provision of transportation, water, waste water, and solid waste is crucial to ensuring that Frontenac County can accommodate any future growth in a manner which is environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable. Section 4.2.1.5 Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services are not provided, individual on-site sewage services sand individual on-site water services may be used provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. In settlement areas, these services may only be used for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development. Negative Impacts shall be defined for the purposes of this section and Section 4.2.1.5 as degradation to the quality and quantity of water, sensitive surface water features and sensitive groundwater features, and their related hydrologic functions, due to single, multiple or successive development. Negative Impacts should be assessed

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 45 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

24 through environmental studies including hydrogeological or water quality impact assessments, in accordance with provincial standards. An extensive hydrogeological report (BluMetric Environmental) was conducted for the subject lands. The report recommended the use of private water and wastewater servicing for the proposed development. Chemical analyses of the groundwater samples collected during the constant discharge tests administered as part of the study indicate that the quality of the groundwater is suitable for domestic supply. The report provides numerous recommendations to mitigate any potential negative impacts associated with private servicing, which will be adhered to throughout the development process.

Section 4.2.2.1 Storm water management plans are usually required for new Greenfield development. Many new Greenfield developments are proposed through a plan of subdivision or plan of condominium and are therefore subject to approval by Frontenac County Council. The purpose of such a plan is to develop methods to control flooding, ponding, erosion, and sedimentation. Storm water plans also help to protect water quality and aquatic habitat and other natural habitat which depend upon watercourses and other water bodies for their existence. This is especially important considering the many lakes within the Frontenacs and the continuing demand for waterfront lots. A Preliminary Stormwater Management Report has been completed by Forefront Engineering (2019) for the proposed development. All recommendations provided through the report have been administered into the proposed plan of subdivision.

Section 4.2.2.2 Storm water management plans may be required for any new development consisting of more than four lots or for commercial or industrial developments with large areas of impervious surface (e.g., asphalt parking and loading areas). Storm water plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Guideline, Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual. When reviewing any such development proposals the approval authorities will encourage the retention of existing tree cover or natural vegetation and the provision of significant grassed and natural areas shall be encouraged to facilitate absorption of surface water into the ground. Given that the proposed development will consist of more than 4 lots, a Preliminary Stormwater Management Report was completed by Forefront Engineering (2019) for the proposed development. The report is submitted with the draft plan of subdivision application. All recommendations and mitigation measures identified through the report will be adhered to. Section 7 – Environmental Sustainability Section 7 of the County Official Plan contemplates goals, objectives and policies relating to sustainability, the protection of the natural environment and water resources, and protection from hazard lands.

Section 7.1.4.1 ‘Significant Wetlands’ details policies dealing with the importance and value of wetlands and the protection of significant wetlands. Through the completion of an Environmental Impact Assessment for the subject lands, no significant wetlands were identified on property. There is a provincially significant wetland located about 80m from the northwest corner of the property, however no negative impacts to the features and functions of this wetland are expected from the development, as there are only 3 proposed lots within the 120m of the significant wetland, and they all achieve a minimum 80m setback. There is also intervening woodland, farmland, and a farm access road. All of these measures were considered to be more than sufficient in the EIA report to prevent a negative impact on the wetland.

Section 7.1.4.3 – ‘Significant Wildlife Habitat’ details policies dealing with the protection of significant wildlife habitat. Section 7.1.4.5 – ‘Endangered and Threatened Species’ defines policies relating to the conservation of endangered and threatened species in Frontenac County. Section 7.1.4.6 – Significant Woodlands’ details policies intended to protect woodlands that are identified as significant. An Environmental Impact Assessment was completed for the subject lands. The mitigation measures recommended through the report will be adhered to throughout the proposed development. Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 46 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

25 Based on this review of the County Official Plan with respect to the proposed development, it is our opinion that the proposed residential development conforms to the County Official Plan.

5.5

Township of South Frontenac Official Plan

The subject property is located within the Settlement Area of Sunbury as identified on Schedule ‘A’ of the OP. The OP provides goals for the different uses that may be established in the area. For this development, the Housing Goal and Objectives provided in section 4.2 should be considered. The Housing Goal of the OP reads: Section 4.2 – Housing Goal

This Official Plan will encourage residential development which is affordable, of high quality and capable of meeting the changing and diverse needs of the rural community. Such development will be carefully planned to reduce land use conflicts, provide long-term protection of the environment and minimize the municipal servicing costs.

The proposed development will further the housing goal for the Township. It will provide quality lots to meet the needs of people looking to live in the settlement area, providing a location that is convenient to the Hamlet of Sunbury and associated services. The development will integrate into an existing intersection at Battersea Road and Sunbury Road, will not impact any significant environmental features, will not create any land use conflicts, and will minimize municipal servicing costs by locating within an existing settlement area and provide individual on-site water and sewer services. Housing Objectives are provided in section (a) of 4.2. The objectives are as follows:

(i)

to minimize the cost of providing essential municipal services to the residents. This will be accomplished by planning controls which consider the long-term servicing costs of all developments.

The proposed development will not require expansion of municipal services such as water or sewer. The development will utilize individual, on-site services to serve the proposed residential lots. As per the findings of a hydrogeological study, this servicing option was determined to be the most financially viable given the rural nature of the surrounding area, and the low density of the proposed development. The proposed subdivision will be easily accessible by emergency services, such as fire and police responses, as it is in close proximity to these services, is connected with existing roads, and provides a new road constructed to municipal standards.

(ii) to maintain the established rural character of the community outside of built up areas. This will be accomplished by zoning controls that mitigate land use conflicts, minimize the impact of development on traditional rural activities and place environmental concerns ahead of residential growth.

This development seeks relief from the minimum lot area and minimum frontage requirements, however the proposed development is consistent with recent developments within the Township of South Frontenac, and fits with the existing character of the surrounding area. Through proper mitigation measures, there are no anticipated impacts on the surrounding environment.

(iii) to provide for a variety of housing types which will meet the varied and evolving needs of the residents. This will be achieved through by-laws which set out the criteria for construction and maintenance standards of various types of accommodation.

This development provides a compatible form of housing to meet the needs of future residents of the Township of South Frontenac.

(iv) to encourage seniors’ facilities, group homes and affordable housing to meet the needs of the community. Mindful of the municipality’s limited funds, this will be accomplished by zoning by-laws rather than by direct or indirect subsidies. (v) to monitor the changing housing needs of the community. This will be accomplished by periodic review of the community’s demographics.

Items iv. and v. are not particularly addressed by this development. Section 5.6 – Settlement Areas within Rural Areas Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 47 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

26 The subject site is designated Settlement Area in the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (Figure 3). Settlement Areas are guided by the policies of Section 5.6. The new growth proposed by this development is directed toward existing settlement areas where it can be supported by appropriate servicing. The long term vision for Settlement Areas identified in the OP includes:

to ensure that sufficient lands are available to permit the location of new development in full accordance with the servicing standards of the Ministry of the Environment; ii) to foster the availability of affordable accommodation by providing alternate locations for new residential development and hence, a competitive housing market; iii) to provide an opportunity for a varied and balanced industrial/commercial base; iv) to promote a full range and mix of housing types and densities; and v) to provide sufficient land for industrial, commercial, institutional and residential uses in order to accommodate anticipated growth over the life of the plan.

It is also noted that:

Development within Settlement Areas will be governed by the servicing requirements of Section 6.10 of this Plan. Where municipal service(s) exist, lot creation will only be permitted if sufficient reserve capacity exists to accommodate the proposed development. In areas which are not serviced with municipal water and/or sewer services, lot creation will only be permitted if the proposed development can be supported by the type of servicing being proposed.

The proposed development is compatible with these guiding statements for Settlement Areas. It will provide for additional housing within the Settlement Area while being supported by individual on-site services, which are common practice on properties in the vicinity of the subject property. The proposed development will not require expansion of municipal services such as water or sewer. The proposed road will be built at the expense of the developer.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 48 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Figure 3 Official Plan Designation - Schedule A Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 49 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

28 Section 5.6.1: Residential Policies a) Permitted Uses: The uses permitted shall include single detached dwellings; semi-detached or duplex dwellings, multiple unit dwellings, single detached dwellings converted to multiple unit dwellings; group homes established in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.5, bed and breakfasts and home occupations. The proposed subdivision is intended to accommodate only single detached dwellings and therefore conforms to this policy. b) Development Criteria for Single Detached, Semi-detached and Duplex Dwelling

a) All development shall be serviced in accordance with Section 6.10 of this Plan. As such, except for Sydenham, development may be permitted to occur on private water supply and sanitary sewage disposal systems. Such systems shall be located and constructed as required by the appropriate approval authority. Within Sydenham, development shall occur on the basis of municipal communal water and private sewage disposal systems. b) Other than in Sydenham, the minimum lot area for a single detached dwelling shall be 0.8 hectares (2 acres) on private services and the minimum lot size for semi-detached or duplex dwellings shall be 0.8 hectares (2 acres) when privately serviced, subject to the approval of the appropriate authority and Council. In Sydenham, the minimum lot area for a single detached dwelling shall be 0.4 hectares (1 acre) on municipal water supply and private sewage disposal services and the minimum lot size for semi-detached or duplex dwellings shall be 0.4 hectares (1 acre) on municipal water and private sewage disposal services, subject to the approval of the appropriate authority and Council. c) Development of single detached, duplex or semi detached dwellings should be compatible with existing and proposed land uses. In this regard, these uses should not be located adjacent to higher density residential, commercial or industrial uses. In the event such uses are adjacent to single detached, semi detached or duplex dwellings, appropriate buffering or screening shall be provided. Details of the buffering or screening techniques shall be detailed in the Zoning By-law.

The proposed development is an appropriate response to these policies. It is serviced in accordance with Section 6.10 of the OP, as is discussed below, and will occur on private services. The proposed development seeks relief for the minimum lot area outlined in part b), however reports detailing the feasibility of providing wastewater disposal to the proposed new development has determined the proposed lot sizes to be a feasible size to support private water and sanitary sewage disposal systems. Overall the Draft Plan conforms with the intent of the OP and as such we believe the relief requested from this policy is justified. The Draft Plan is located on private services, away from sensitive and potentially hazardous uses such as natural features or waste disposal areas. It is consistent with the general character of this area which includes single-detached residential uses. It will provide new linkages to Gerald Ball Memorial Park and all proposed lots will front onto a public road.

Section 5.6.6 – Settlement Areas Lot Creation Policies The creation of new building lots in the Settlement Areas shall be permitted in accordance with this section 5.6, section 7 and the following. It is the Municipality’s intention that new lot development in Settlement Areas will generally occur by plan of subdivision. However, a maximum of five (5) severances (changed from three (3)severances as per Council) may be permitted from a lot of record existing on the day of adoption of this Plan by Council (September 5, 2000) where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision. The proposed development occurs within a Settlement area and will be created by draft plan of subdivision. Section 6.10 – Servicing As mentioned above, development must be consistent with Section 6.10 of the OP which specifically deals with servicing development. Ensuring that proposed developments have an adequate supply of potable water and is

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 50 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

29 serviced by proven sanitary sewage disposal systems is a primary objective of the OP (6.10). Development is to predominantly occur on private wells and septic (6.10.1). Where residential development has been proposed of more than five lots on individual private water and sewage, the Township will require a Private Services Impact Assessment Report. Within settlement areas [except Sydenham], development shall occur primarily on the basis of private water and sanitary sewage disposal systems (6.10.2). Development applications shall be accompanied by a report prepared by a professional engineer indicating that the conditions are appropriate for the private services (6.10.3). The proposed development has been extensively studied and reports have been prepared in accordance Section 6.10. The development will proceed through the use of individual, private water and sewage services. Section 7.2 – General Policies for Plans of Subdivision The OP includes general policies for Plans of Subdivision in Section 7.2. The policies that apply are as follows:

a) Development of land by plan of subdivision shall be required when the creation of more than 4 lots, including severed and retained lots, is proposed.

A draft plan of subdivision is submitted with this application.

b) The proposed subdivision shall be at a scale which is compatible with the existing or anticipated scale of development in the area.

The lots within the proposed subdivision are of a scale consistent with the rural area and generally conform to the provisions of the zoning by-law.

c) Access roads shall have the capability to support the additional traffic loads anticipated from the proposal. Where upgrading and additional maintenance may be required, the Municipality will assess the financial impact of these additional expenditures and may levy charges or request a contribution from the developer to offset these costs. All subdivision development shall occur on a publicly maintained municipal road.

Access to the site is provided from a newly proposed road, with a single connection to Battersea Road. The proposed new road will be constructed to Township standards, and will be a publicly maintained road. A Traffic Impact Study has been prepared in support of the proposed development, which demonstrates that the existing road network has sufficient capacity to accommodate increased levels of traffic generated as a result of the proposed development.

d) New subdivision lots shall comply with the minimum lot areas and frontages in Section 5.7.4 (ii) (a) of this Plan unless it is demonstrated through the subdivision review process that reductions to these minimums are justified based on good land use planning principles. For proposed waterfront lots, some individual lot frontages or areas may be less than the minimum standards specified, provided the average lot frontages and areas comply with these minimums. For greater certainty, all lots shall have sufficient area so that a private well for water supply can be located without danger of contamination by the sewage system and so that a serious draw down of groundwater levels beyond the boundaries of the lot itself can be avoided. An application for a privately serviced plan of subdivision shall be accompanied by a detailed hydrogeological study and such other analysis as is required in accordance with Ministry of the Environment guidelines, all of which shall be prepared by a qualified professional and satisfactory to the Municipality. An application for a privately serviced plan of subdivision shall be in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change’s guidelines. The proposed lot areas have been reduced to a minimum of 0.6ha and the lot frontages have been reduced to a minimum of 47 metres. This has been addressed in the proposed site specific zoning by-law amendment. A hydrogeological study has been prepared and has gone through technical review. It demonstrates that the development can be accommodated in this location. All servicing will be in accordance with Ministry of the Environment guidelines and approval authority standards. Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 51 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

30 e) All applications for subdivision management/drainage plan.

shall

accompanied

preliminary

A stormwater management plan has been prepared by Forefront Engineering (2019) and accompany the draft plan of subdivision.

stormwater

is submitted to

Lots shall have access on an interior public road, developed to standards satisfactory to the Municipality. A limited number of lots may be permitted access on an existing municipal road of an appropriate standard where the Municipality is satisfied that such access is appropriate. Nothing in the aforementioned shall be construed as encouraging access to existing roads.

A new public road is proposed for new lots to front on, which fits within the grid network of existing roads

g) As many trees as possible shall be preserved, particularly mature and healthy stands of trees and reforestation shall take place where appropriate.

The land is largely former soybean cropland with few/no trees on the majority of the proposed lots. There is a wooded area that will be partially preserved as it falls within a required setback from a wetland area located adjacent to the subject lands.

h) Topography and/or vegetation shall be maintained and augmented to create an appropriate or desirable environment and buffering may be requested to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses.

Topography will be maintained and a designated parkland connection will be provided to enhance the area and environment for residents.

Plans of subdivision shall be designed to allow for the appropriate integration of the subject lands with the adjacent lands.

The proposed development provides a new road connection that is integrated with existing road networks.

The proposal shall be appropriately served by existing levels of municipal services such as fire protection, police protection, garbage collection and school facilities. Any proposal requiring substantial upgrading to existing services will generally not be permitted unless it is determined by the Municipality and any pertinent agencies to be appropriate.

The proposed development is within a settlement area and will provide easy access from main existing roads.

k) The Municipality shall enter into a subdivision agreement with each developer as a condition of the approval of a Plan of Subdivision. This agreement will set out the internal and external services and obligations that shall be required of the developer.

A subdivision agreement will be entered into as part of the plan of subdivision process.

The developer shall provide background information satisfactory to the Municipality demonstrating the appropriateness of the location for the plan of subdivision. This information may include drainage studies, traffic impact studies and environmental impact statements.

Several technical studies, as described earlier in this report, have been prepared and are submitted in support of the subject applications. m) Plans of subdivision shall be compatible with adjacent areas and the general intent of this Plan. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent areas and meets the general intent of the OP. n)

A cultural heritage resource assessment may be required for any lands to be subdivided. The assessment and any recommendations for the conservation of significant cultural heritage resources identified through the assessment may be a condition of subdivision approval and may be included in the subdivision agreement.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 52 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

31 A Stage 1 & 2 archaeological report has been prepared for the proposed development and no significant archaeological resources were found during stage 2 work. Authors recommend clearance of archaeological interest in the property.

o) The specific provisions of the Planning Act relating to plans of subdivision will apply in addition to the policies set out in this Plan.

The proposed development is consistent with the provisions of the Planning Act.

p) The Township is entitled to a dedication of land for park purposes as a condition on any division of land. Cash-in-lieu of land may be requested by the Municipality in situations where there is a public park in the area which is adequate for existing and future population. Cash-in-lieu may also be requested where the amount of land involved is small and therefore unsuitable for park development. Where lands are dedicated for park purposes, the Municipality will accept only those lands suitable for park use.

A 6m wide park block has been provided to act as a connection to the existing park, Gerald Ball Memorial Park, located adjacent to the subject lands. As such, cash-in-lieu of parkland is proposed to satisfy the remaining parkland requirement. It is our opinion that the development is consistent with the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 53 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

6.0 CURRENT & PROPOSED ZONING

The subject property is regulated by the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-Law 2003-75. The subject property is currently zoned Urban Residential – First Density Zone (UR1) which permits a range of uses including agricultural and related uses, single-detached dwellings, and other uses that are considered compatible with rural areas. The draft plan of subdivision will accommodate the development of 31 singledetached dwellings, which is a permitted use in the UR1 zone, therefore the proposed zoning by-law amendment will seek to describe appropriate provisions in a site-specific UR1 zone. The existing and surrounding zoning is shown in Figure 4 below.

Figure 3- Current Zoning Figure 4 Zoning Context

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 54 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

33 The following table assess the proposed development against the applicable provisions of the zone. Provision

Parent UR1 Zone

Permitted Uses

• • • • •

•

Proposed UR1-X

a single detached • dwelling, existing agricultural • uses, a public park, accessory buildings or uses to the above uses, a home occupation, according to the provisions of Section 5.28 of this By-law, a home industry, according to the provisions of Section 5.29 of this By-law,

single detached dwellings a public park

Amendment Required No

Minimum Lot Area

8,000 sq. m

6,000 sq. m

Yes

Minimum Lot Frontage

76 m

47.55m

Yes

Front Yard (min)

7.5m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Rear Yard (min)

7.5m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Interior Side Yard (min)

2.5m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Exterior Side Yard (min)

7.5m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Gross Floor Area (min)

89 sq. m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Maximum Building Height

11 m

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Maximum Lot Coverage

20%

No building envelope proposed at this time.

Parking

Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5.30.

No parking proposed at this time

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 55 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

34 6.1

Minimum Lot Area

The draft plan of subdivision does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of 8,000 square metres required in the Urban Residential First Density Zone. The proposed lot sizes will, however, be sufficient size to accommodate private on-site water and sewer services, as demonstrated through an extensive hydrogeological report. The minimum lot areas will also be of sufficient size to meet the yard setbacks set out in the Zoning By-law. It is proposed to reduce the minimum lot area to 6,000 square metres, to provide flexibility to the surveyor in ensuring that the lot will be compliant with zoning. Relief is requested from the minimum lot area to provide an efficient use of lands within the Hamlet. It is our opinion that the proposed reduction will not disrupt the functionality of the subdivision or disrupt the existing character within the area.

6.2

Minimum Lot Frontage

The draft plan of subdivision does not meet the minimum lot frontage requirement of 76 metres. To accommodate a more efficient use of the Hamlet lands, it is proposed to reduce the minimum lot frontage to 45 metres to provide flexibility to the surveyor. It is our opinion that the proposed reduction will not disrupt the functionality of the subdivision or disrupt the existing character within the area. Relief is requested from the minimum lot frontage, to provide an efficient use of lands within the Hamlet.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 56 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

7.0 CONCLUSION

This application for Draft Plan of Subdivision and a Zoning By-Law amendment seeks to permit a subdivision of land located within the Sunbury Settlement Area in the Township of South Frontenac. The Draft Plan includes 31 proposed lots with lot sizes ranging from 0.61 hectares (1.5 acres) to 3.41 hectares (8.42 acres) in area. The proposed development includes a parkland block approximately 0.04 hectares in size and lot addition approximately 0.19 hectares in size to be added to a neighbouring residential lot. The pattern of development proposed is consistent with the rural settlement area of Sunbury. For example all lots are privately serviced and front on a proposed municipal road. The requested zoning amendments which propose to reduce the minimum required lot area and frontage requirements are consistent with other rural area/rural settlement development from recent years (i.e. Storrington District). The proposed development is as compact as individually serviced lots can be, this is due to topography and the shape of the development parcel with regards to the existing roads. The Provincial Policy Statement, Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, and Frontenac County Official Plan are supportive of residential development when it occurs in a matter that is compatible with the adjacent uses and does not infringe on any resource, agricultural operations, or significant natural features. Extensive works have been completed to review any potential impacts of the proposed development and with appropriate mitigation measures the proposed development can be accommodated on site without negative impacts. In summary, the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit the proposed subdivision appropriately fits within the rural character of this area and represents an appropriate use of the subject lands. It is our opinion that this application represents good planning. Respectfully,

Mike Keene, MCIP RPP Principal, Planning + Development Fotenn Consultants Inc.

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 57 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX A PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

UR1‐X (Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2, Township of South Frontenac) Notwithstanding the zone regulations in section 14.3.1. or any other provision of this By-Law to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Urban Residential-First Density (UR1-14) Zone the following provisions shall apply: i. ii.

Lot Area (Minimum) 0.6 Hectares (1.48 ac.) The minimum lot frontage shall be 45 m (147.67 ft).

All other provisions of this by‐law shall apply. Schedule ‘A’

Planning Demonstration Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Sunbury Subdivision

Page 58 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

249.05

209.97

8.89

WETLAND

200 .63 TW2

.19

B A

143.55

1.03 ha

95.67

0.80 ha

0.62 ha

76.02 0.61 ha

237.23

A 161.33

164.51

1.27 ha

62.90

15 1.25 ha

75 .99

.3 53

164.94

1.25 ha

30.0m SETBACK FROM WETLAND

20 .0

68.35

81.86

76.02

STREET A TW2-EXP

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

21 2.40 ha

76.00

216.87

1.76 ha

87.67 100.07

112.01

0.60 ha

0.61 ha

74.05

92.21

10 84.67

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

25 0.61 ha

99.20

TW 3

68.23

123.77

58.79

20.0m

0.61 ha

BLOCK 33

59.04

74.05

98.68

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

64.90

0.61 ha AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

68.11

STREET A

80.17

100.07

99.98

WETLAND AREA (SWD2-1). ECOLOGICAL SITE VISIT AUGUST 2018. REFERENCE PAGE 2 OF THE “DRAFT ADDENDUM TO THE JULY 2, 2013 NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT”, PREPARED BY ECOLOGICAL SERVICES.

20 0

20 76.00

AGRICULTURAL LANDS

111.03

149.99

1.13 ha

134.93

1.04 ha

1.00 ha

140.75

161.03

MW1

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

5.02

A=52.82

32.32

59.64

96.42

48.67

PUBLIC LIBRARY

105.22

0.60 ha 69.28

A 26

BLOCK 32

0.62 ha

264.14

75.95

0.61 ha

TW1

92.05

27 0.60 ha

A 86.92

EXISTING BUILDING

87.51

20.0m

0.61 ha

B 0.60 ha 90.37

90.39

4 30 66.62

66.53

0.60 ha

B A

280.24

0.62 ha

15.0m SETBACK FROM INTERMITTENT CHANNEL

279.38

15.0m SETBACK FROM INTERMITTENT CHANNEL

B 68.80

66.86

A 5

88.95

STREET A

89.05

COUNTY ROAD NO

68.83

69.08

0.61 ha

REALIGN INTERMITTENT CHANNEL

138.51

71.22

6.0m WIDE PARK BLOCK

AD) . 11 (BATTERSEA RO

0.61 ha

91.57

A 91.78

TW4-EXP

B 75.27

TW 5

47.5

A 31

92.75

OAD

SUNBURY R

92.87

0.81 ha

0.68 ha

92.75 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

30.0m WETLAND SETBACK

4 12

3.41 ha

S EA

181.14

N AI

33.25

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

URBAN COMMERCIAL

38.48

33.93

64.67 URBAN RESIDENTIAL

80 .9

110.86

10.00

65.72

0.61 ha

WETLAND AREA (W2 & W3). ECOLOGICAL SITE VISIT AUGUST 2018. REFERENCE PAGE 4 OF THE “ADDENDUM TO THE JULY 2, 2013 NATURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT”, PREPARED BY ECOLOGICAL SERVICES. HIGH WATER LINE

TW4

30.0m WETLAND SETBACK

URBAN COMMERCIAL

42.67

54.50

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

m H=1:2000

ROAD MORELAND-DIXON

Project

SUNBURY SUBDIVISION

LEGEND:

EXISTING WELL

Drawing

CONCEPT PLAN

PROPOSED WELL TW 5

No.

Revision/Issue

Date

MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED SEPTIC OPTION 1

PROPOSED SEPTIC OPTION 2 PROPOSED HOUSE

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8 613.634.9009 tel. 1.888.884.9392 fax.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Checked by:

KMN

Approved by:

KMN

Project No.

Drawing No.

Client

2628100 ONTARIO INC. INTERMITTENT CHANNEL REALIGNMENT

Drawn by:

Date:

APRIL 2020 Scale:

1:2000 (ANSI D)

Page 59 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Page 1 of 2

Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport

Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport

Culture Programs Unit Programs and Services Branch Culture Division 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Tel.: (519) 675-6898 Email: Shari.Prowse@ontario.ca

Unité des programmes culturels Direction des programmes et des services Division de culture 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Tél. : (519) 675-6898 Email: Shari.Prowse@ontario.ca

Dec 20, 2013 Susan Bazely (P020) 24 Jenkins Kingston ON K7K 1N3 RE:

Review and Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, “Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessment of Sunbury Proposed Subdivision, Sunbury, Part Lots 25 &26, Concession 2, South Frontenac Township, Ontario”, Dated Jan 31, 2011, Filed with MTCS Toronto Office on Feb 11, 2011, MTCS Project Information Form Number P020-103-2010, MTCS File Number 10SB162

Dear Ms. Bazely: This office has reviewed the above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18. This review has been carried out in order to determine whether the licensed professional consultant archaeologist has met the terms and conditions of their licence, that the licensee assessed the property and documented archaeological resources using a process that accords with the 1993 Archaeological Assessment Technical Guidelines set by the ministry, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations are consistent with the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario. This report was subjected to a review that focused specifically on concerns for archaeological resources and/or sites in relation to the outcomes and recommendations of the report. This focused review does not alter or affect your obligation as the licensee to ensure that all reports submitted meet the Ministry technical guidelines and terms and conditions of licence. The report documents the assessment of the study area as depicted in Figure 10 of the above titled report and recommends the following: No further archaeological study is required and the property be cleared for development. Should deeply buried archaeological remains be found on the property during construction activities, Ministry of Culture should be notified immediately. In the event that human remains are encountered during construction both the Ministry of Culture and the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Regulation Unit should be notified. Based on the information contained in the report, the ministry is satisfied that the fieldwork and reporting for the archaeological assessment are consistent with the ministry’s 1993 Archaeological Assessment Technical Guidelines and the Terms and Conditions for Archaeological Licences. This report has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 60 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Page 2 of 2

Should you require any further information regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Shari Prowse Archaeology Review Officer

cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer

*In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter. Further measures may need to be taken in the event that additional artifacts or archaeological sites are identified or the Report(s) is otherwise found to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 61 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Natural Heritage Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Hamlet of Sunbury Subdivision Development Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2

Prepared for: Brett Campbell Campbell Land Developments LTD 77 Byron Crescent, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1J1

‘ C’

ECOLOGICAL SERVICES

Rob Snetsinger

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

July 2, 2013

Page 62 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbury ESA for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Table of Contents

…………………………………………………………………. ..3 ……………………………………………………….. 2. Legislative Requirements……………………………………………………………… ..4 1.

Summary

…………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………… .. 5 ………………………… 4. Proposed Development ……………………………………………………………….. ..6 ……………………………………… …………………………………………………………………. 5. Ecological Land Classi?cation ..6 3.

Methodology and Quali?cations

Assessment of Natural Features

6.0 6.1 6.2

…………………………. …………………………………………………………………. .. 7 ………………………… Wetland ………………………………………………………………………. ..7 …………………………………………….. and Scienti?c Interest ……………………………………………………….. Area of Natural ..9 …………………. Valleylands ……………………………………………………………………. ..9

………………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………….. ..9 ………………………………….. …………………………………………………………………………. Wildlife Habitat 6.4 .. ll …………………………….. Fish Habitat …………………………………………………………………………….. 6.5 .. 18 ……………………………….. 7. References…………………………………………………………………………………. .. l9 ……………………………………. 6.3

Woodlands

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 63 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur} ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

Services

Summary

This environmental site assessment was requested by Brett Campbell who proposes to develop vacant land within the Hamlet of Sunbury. The area proposed for developmentwill be borderedto the north by farmland,to the south by residential and commercial properties within Sunbury, to the east by Battersea Rd. and more farmland,and to the west by Gerald Ball MemorialPark. The bulk of the developmentproperty is active farmland of which we have no concerns for in regards to negative impactsto natural heritage features. The property also includesa black ash swamp, and small wetlands. There is also an area of woodland that has been logged for many years and a farm drain.

There are no listed signi?cant natural heritage featuresin the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan for the developmentproperty, which is within the boundariesof the Hamlet of Sunbury. There is a provincially signi?cant wetland located about 80 meters from the northwest corner of the property, with an interveningfarm access road, woodland and farmland. No negative impacts to the wetland features and functions are expected from the development. There are woodlands on the property and we applied provincial standards to determinetheir level of significance as the Township of South Frontenacdoes not have significant woodland mapping. As a result of our assessment, we determinedthat the woodlands were not significant. There are wetlands and drainage areas within that property that come under the jurisdiction of CRCA Regulation 148/06. The largest wetland (approx. 3 ha.) located in the northeast comer of the development property is a black ash swamp. It will be protected with a 30 m setback. The proposed placement of a road cul-de-sacat the south end of the property may impinge on one of the small canary reed grass/cattail wetlands located in a low area of the farm fields. This wetland does not have significant natural heritage features and therefore we do not have any concerns if this wetland were moved as part of a cut and fill type of agreement. Our recommendationwould be to move it southeast.

Stormwaterimpacts should be the focus of hydrologicalengineeringand be dealt with to the satisfaction of the various authorizing agencies.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 64 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbury ESA for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Legislative Requirements

Ontario Regulation 148/06. Cataraqui Region ConservationAuthority.’Regulation development, of with wetlands, and alterations to shorelines and watercourses. interference The regulation might apply to any drainage creeks, however this regulation is primarily intendedfor water control issues, and will not be covered in the ESA. The farm drain itself has little ecological value as it is dry for much of the year and bisects an active farm ?eld. Four small wetlands

(0.06 ha., 0.15 ha., and 0.35 ha. and 0.39 ha.) at the southern end of the property provide habitat for common wetland species, but no rarities or signi?cant threshold numbers were encountered.

Fisheries Act Under Section 35 of the federal Fisheries Act: “ no person shall carry on any work or undertaking that results in the harmful alteration, disruptionor destructionoffishhabitat.

”

The farm drain does not contain ?sh habitat. The largest of the small wetlands at the southern end of the property contains low quality fish habitat containing hardy generalist species, such as mud minnow and stickleback. There are no intentions to develop within this ?sh habitat, and its function as fish habitat

could be enhanced if used for stormwater management.

Species at Risk Act Under Section 32 of the federal Species at Risk Act:

“no person shall kill, harm, harass, capture or take an individual ofa species that is wildlife listed as an extirpated species, an endangered species or a threatened species. ”

Under Section 33 of the federal Species at Risk Act: “

no person shall person shall damage or destroy the residence ofone or more individuals a of species that is listed as an endangered species or a threatened species wildlife ”

No known species at risk were found or expected within the development property, which is mostly active farmland.

PROVINCIAL PLANNING POLICY The main focus of this EIA will be to address issues associated with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act, Section 2.1 of the PPS requires that municipalities consider natural heritage features in assessing developmentproposals. Guidance on the extent of adjacent lands is provided in a Natural Heritage Reference Manual (OMNR 2010). The adjacent land width for significant natural heritage features is 120 m. From the Policy: 2.1.3 Developmentand site alteration shall not be permitted in: a) significant habitat of endangered species and threatened species;

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 65 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbuij ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

Services

No signi?cant endangered or threatenedspecies were found or expected within the proposed development lands, or adjacent to the proposed developmentlands. b) signi?cant wetlands in Ecoregions SE, 6E and 7E; and

There is no signi?cant wetland within the proposed developmentlands. 2.1.4 Development and site alteration shall not be permitted in: b) signi?cant woodlands south and east of the Canadian Shield;

There are no signi?cant woodlands within the proposed developmentlands. c) signi?cant valleylands south and east of the Canadian Shield;

There is no signi?cant valleyland within the proposed development lands. d) significant wildlife habitat; and

There is no signi?cant wildlife habitat within the proposed development lands. 2.1.5: Development and site alteration shall not be permitted in ?sh habitat except in accordance with provincial and federalrequirements.

The ?sh habitat associated with the development lands is marginal, of the type that might be found in a farm pond. There will be no development within this ?sh habitat. 2.1.6: Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on adjacent lands the to natural heritage unless the ecological functionofthe adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstratedthat there will be no negative impacts on the natural featuresor on their ecological

featuresand areas

functions.

Adjacent lands are de?ned in the PPS: “. . .those lands contiguous to a speci?c natural heritage

featureor area where it is likely that developmentor site alteration would have a negative impact on the featureor area…” Guidance on the extent of adjacent lands is provided in a Natural Heritage Reference Manual (OMNR 2010), which lists an adjacent land width of 120 In for all signi?cant heritage features. There is signi?cant wetland within 120 in of the northwest corner of the development.

Methodology and Qualifications

Natural feature surveys of lands within 120 m of the proposed development lands were carried out by Rob Snetsinger of Ecological Services. Ecological Services is a locally owned ?rm, specializingin the provision of services relating to ecological management and research. We have been in operation in eastern Ontario since 1985. Our core personnel combine education and experience to give us a strong focus on land use planning and management as they relate to natural resources. Our experience includes

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 66 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbury ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

gemces

environmentalimpact assessments, management plans, wetland evaluations,and municipal land use planning.We have research experience in aquatic ecology and chemistry, forest fragmentation,avian ecology, and ?sheriesecology. The determination of signi?cant natural heritage features and functions was determinedwith several site visits. The bulk ofthe ?eld work occurred in 2010, but with follow up visits in 201 1, 2012, and 2013 to determineif any obvious ecological changes had occurred since 2010. Natural features,signi?cant wildlife habitat (as described in OMNR 2012), and species of conservation were consideredduring the site investigation. Species were identi?ed by common name, which are written according to the standard rule of lower-caseletters for all species excluding birds and proper nouns, in which case it is capitalized (e.g. woodland vole, Blanding’s turtle, and Black Tern). The binomialnomenclaturesystem is a standard method used to formulate the scientific name of an organism (e.g. genus name + species name). Scienti?c and common names used in this report follow those used by the MNR. The site investigationwas completed in part to verify the presence and/or absence of natural features and species of conservation concern identi?ed by the OMNR. The methodologyused during the site investigation involved walking the site by foot and documentingthe natural features (including wildlife habitat), and characteristicplant and wildlife species. Habitat communities are described following the methodologyoutlined in the ELC for Southern Ontario (Lee et al., 1998). Photographsof the site were also taken to documentnatural features observed during the site investigation. Signi?cant natural features identi?cationwas based on criteria outlined in the Natural Heritage Reference Manual (MNR 2010), Draft Signi?cant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion Criteria Schedules(MNR 2012) and Signi?cant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (MNR 2000).

Wildlife species of interest (e.g., butter?ies,mammals) were noted as encountered from direct observation,or from other signs of their presence (tracks, scat, den sites, etc.).

Vascular plant species were used to characterizeELC community types. Species of conservation concern would be GPS referenced and the habitat surveyed in order to determinethe extent of the population. If specimens could not be identi?ed in the ?eld they would be assessed later using appropriate references (e.g., Gleason and Cronquist 1991; Queens University Fowler Herbariumrecords).

Proposed

Development

The proposed developmentis provided in the accompanying .pdf ?le produced by Josselyn Engineering Inc.

Ecological Land Classification

Ecological land classi?cation(ELC) determination was based on Lee et al. (1998), and is presented in Figure l. The developmentlands are mostly active farmland labeled Agr in Figure 1.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 67 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbury ESA for Brett Campbell

EcolooicalServices

Other upland features includethree forest types that have undergone logging for many years. These includeDry Fresh Sugar Maple DeciduousForest Type (FOD5—l),Cultural Woodland(CUW), and ConiferousWoodland(F OC).

Wetland featuresincludeBlack Ash Mineral Deciduous SwampType (SWD2-l) and four small wetland cells (W1, W2, W3, and W4) that are dominatedby cattails and canary reed grass. The closest locationof the provinciallysigni?cant Collins Lake/InveraryLake Wetland Complex can be seen in the lower left of Figure 1. There is a farm drain running through the bottom half of the property. .,,,‘.

-1-

Figure 1. ELC designations for the development property.

Assessment of Natural Features

6.0

Wetland

The Collins Lake/InveraryLake Wetland complex was evaluated as signi?cant in 1985 by a student crew working for the Cataraqui Region ConservationAuthority using the 2"“edition of the wetland evaluation manual. A desktop re-evaluation was completed in 2004 for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources using the 3“ edition of the manual. There is no doubtabout the significance of this large wetland that extends in a meandering fashion all the way to Lake Ontario. The two wetland communitiesclosest to the subject lands were designated as hs6 and rem20 in the 1985 wetland evaluation, which means they were the sixth and twentieth communities designated in the wetland evaluation. The former (hs6) would be a hardwoodswamp, likely similar to the SWD2—lswamp on the subject property; the latter (reM20) would be a robust emergent wetland, likely dominatedby cattails. The closest locationof the wetland is about 80 meters from the northwest comer of the development lands, and only one of the lots will be within 120 m (see Figure 2). The wetland is separated from the

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 68 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbury ESA for Brett Campbell Ecologica]

gcmces

developmentlands by a dense barrier of woodlands,and is also located in a valley about 10 m down a steep slopebelow the adjacent farmland. As such, species movement from the wetland across this barrier to the developmentlands would be minimal. Furthermore, the interveningand existing farmlandsare not normally well used by wetland species, and so wetlandspecies interactionson the subject lands would be minimal. Topographicconditionsare such that stormwater from the development lands will ?ow away from the wetland. Developmenton adjacent lands within 120 m of a signi?cant wetland is allowed if that developmentwill not impactthe key wetland featuresand functions. Impact Statement for Wetland: Given the following:

Eighty meters minimumdistance from potential development.
Interveningwoodland buffer and interveningfarm land.
Lack of use of interveninglands by wetland species. The ecological features (e.g., rarities, structural habitat) and functions (hydrology) of the wetland will continue to thrive after the development is complete.

Conclusion: The developmentwill not have a negative impact on Collins Lake/InveraryLake Wetland complex. In regards to signi?cant wetlands,this developmentwill be in compliance with the FPS, and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Note: The largest wetlandwithin the property (SWD2-1) is not signi?cant, but will be protected under Ontario Regulation 148/06 with a 30 m setback. There may be a con?ict betweenthe developmentand the Regulation in regards to the four wetland cells at the southern end of the property. These cells do not contain signi?cant natural heritage features, although one of them contains ?sh habitat (W2 in Figure 1).

Figure 2. Northwest comer of the developmentproperty and the edge of the signi?cant

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

wetland.

Page 69 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Slli1bUl’)' ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological Services

6.1

Area of Natural and Scientific Interest

There are no ANSI’swithin 120 m of the proposed development

area.

Impact In regards to signi?cant ANSI’s, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township and there will be no negative ANSI impacts.

Statement:

6.2

Valleylands

There are no signi?cant Valleylandswithin 120 m of the proposed

developmentarea

Conclusion:In regards to valleyland, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship and there will be no negative impacts to Valleylands.

6.3

Woodlands

Based on the classificationscheme devised by Lee et al (1998) there are several upland woodland classi?cationtypes on the adjacent lands. (FOD5-1). This community is located in the north half of the

property, and extends west and southward community is dominatedby Sugar Maple as well as the sub canopy and shrub layers. Other species observed include white ash and ironwood. FOD5-1 is one of the most common communities in the region, especially on lands associated with an agricultural past whereby the forests were accessible to cattle. This is an uneven aged forest with no clear age class dominance,especially since logging activities appear to have focused on the older trees. There are several well-traveledskidder/loggingtrails throughout. onto municipal park lands. The top canopy of this

Coniferous Forest (F OC). The FOC designation can encompassany type of coniferous forest, but was applied here because there is no designation for a Dry Hemlock forest in the ELC manual. On the developmentproperty, this habitat type is found on a west facing slope, with dry shallow soil, and exposed bedrock. The dominanttree is Hemlock, and the understory is mostly devoid of vegetation. Logging has also occurred in the coniferous forest, but is still more even aged than the adjacent deciduous woodland,with the average tree age to be in the 60 year range. This portion of the woodlot had the least amount of bio-diversity,appearing mainly as a monoculture of Hemlock trees. Cultural Woodland (CUW). Cultural habitatsresult from, or are maintained by anthropogenic disturbances. The two small cultural woodlands on the development lands are comprised by a mix of species with no real dominant overstory species and both contain many non-native species. These areas have also experienced logging.

WOODLAND SIGNIFICANCE The Township of South Frontenac has no criteria for woodland signi?cance and so we are applying standardsnominally used in the province, includingthose describedin the Natural Heritage Reference Manual for Natural Heritage Policies ofthe Provincial Policy Statement Municipalities. They

include:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 70 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # SunbunESA for Brett Campbell Ecological services

Size. Municipalitiessuch as South Frontenac, with at least 30% woodland cover shouldconsider woodlands50 ha. or greater as signi?cant. The subject woodland is about 8 ha, but combined with the adjacent public-use woodland is about 16 ha.

Ranking Score: low.

, with at least 30% woodland cover should consider woodlandswith 8ha. of core interiorhabitat as signi?cant. Core interior woodland is undisturbedhabitat within 100 meters of the woodland ed ge. The subject property has no core habitat. Ranking Score: low. 3. Erosion buffering. Forests growing on steep slopes provide value for erosion buffering. There are no steep slopes on the subject woodland,although a portion of the FOC woodland (see Figure 1) has a moderate slope.

Ranking Score: low 4. Linkages. Woodlands that provide a connecting link between two other signi?cant features, each of which is within a speci?ed distance (e.g., 120 m) and the linkage meets minimum area thresholds.The subject woodlands do not connect signi?cant features.

Ranking Score: low 5. Uncommon characteristics (e.g., rarities). No rarities

are known or encountered.

Ranking Score: low 6. Water Protection: Woodlands located within a sensitive watershed or a speci?ed distanceof a sensitive groundwater discharge,sensitive recharge, sensitive headwaterarea, watercourse or ?sh habitat. None of these are adjacent to the development woodlots.

Ranking Score: low 7. Age. Forests dominatedby trees in the 100+ year range can be considered signi?cant. The forest is not dominatedby trees in the 100+ year range. Ranking Score: low 8. Diversity. The subject woodlands do not have high

vegetative biodiversity.

Ranking Score: low-moderate 9. Disturbance. A lack of disturbanceis better for woodland

a history of logging, is next to farmlandand public-use

crisscrossedby skidder/bushroads.

signi?cance. The subject woodlandhas woodland that contains ATV trails, and is

Ranking Score: low

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 71 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur} ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological Services

Impact Statement: The woodlandsof the subject property are not signi?cant. As such, there will be no negative impacts to signi?cant woodlandsfrom the proposed development. The woodland is not signi?cant and so the development will not be in con?ict with the PPS and the policies of South Frontenac Township in regards to woodland signi?cance.

6.4

Wildlife Habitat

Summary: None of the criteria for wildlife habitat signi?cance were

met

by the developmentlands.

The draft Signi?cant Wildlife Habitat Criteria for Site Region 6E (MNR 2012) describes in detail the habitat and wildlife requirements and thresholds. A list of the criteria is provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1. Wildlifehabitat criteria from OMNR (2012). Wildlife Habitat Category Criteria Seasonal ConcentrationAreas

i. Waterfowl stopover and staging areas (terrestrial) ii. Waterfowl stopover and staging areas (aquatic) iii. Shorebird migratory stopover area iv. Raptor wintering area Bat hibernacula Bat Maternity Colonies

v. vi.

vii. Bat Migratory Stopover Area viii. Turtle WinteringAreas ix. Reptile hibernaculum

Colonially -Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat (Bank and Cliff Colonially -Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat Breeding Habitat

xi.

(Tree/Shrubs) xii. Colonially -Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat (Ground)

xiii. Migratory Butter?y Stopover Areas xiv. Landbird Migratory Stopover Areas

xv. Deer Yarding Areas xvi. Deer Winter CongregationAreas

Rare Vegetation Communities

i. Alvar ii. Cliffand talus slopes iii. Savannah iv. Tallgrass prairie v. Sand barren vi. Other rare vegetation communities _*

Specialized Habitat for Wildlife

nesting area Waterfowl

L E 7. 7.

HabitaiorSpecies g[_

Bald Eagle and Osprey Nesting, Foraging and Perching Habitat Woodland Raptor Nesting Habitat Turtle Nesting Areas Seeps and Springs Amphibian BreedingHabitat (Woodland) Amphibian BreedingHabitat (Wetlands) Marsh bird breedinghabitat

. E. i.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 72 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur} BSA for Brett Campbell Ecological

ConservationConcern

Animal Movement Corridors

services

ii. WoodlandArea-sensitivebird breedinghabitat iii. Open country bird breeding habitat iv. Shrub/earbz successional bird breedinghabitat V. Terrestrial Cray?sh vi. Special concern and Rare Wildlife Species i. Amphibian movement corridors; ii. Deer movement corridors

Each of these types of wildlife habitat was considered during the site investigationand is describedin further detail below. '

Seasonal ConcentrationAreas: Habitatsof seasonal concentrations of animals are areas where animals occur in relatively high densities for specific periods in their life cycles and/or in particular seasons. stopover and staging areas (terrestrial): Suitable stopover Waterfowl and staging habitat for migrating waterfowl include cultural meadow and thicket communities that are seasonally ?ooded. There are no cultural meadow or thicket communities within 120 m of the developmentarea that have the appropriate seasonal ?ooding necessary for waterfowl stopover and staging (terrestrial).

Conclusion: In regards to waterfowl stopover and staging areas (terrestrial), this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS, and policies of South Frontenac Township. stopover and staging areas (aquatic): These areas include Waterfowl ponds, marshes, lakes, bays, coastal inlets, and watercourses that are used during migration and in order to have potential for signi?cance; a site needs to have an abundant food supply, such as aquatic invertebratesand vegetation in shallow water. The watercourse and ponds within the developmentlands have neither the volume or vegetative feeding characteristicsto support the needed aggregations of l00 or more listed waterfowl species for 7 days, resulting in greater than 700 waterfowl use days.

Conclusion: In regards to waterfowl stopover and staging areas (aquatic) this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Shorebird migratory stopover area: Shorebirdmigratory stopover would have shorelineareas that are usually muddy and un-vegetated, but can also include beach bars and seasonally ?ooded shoreline. There are no such habitats present.

Conclusion: In regards to shorebird migratory stopover, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Raptor wintering area.‘ This habitat type includesa combination of ?elds (CUM, CUT) and woodlands(F OD, F OM, FOC) that provide roosting, foragingand resting habitat for wintering raptors. The type of plowing and crop farming taking place on the developmentlands do not

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 73 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbuiy ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological Services

provide the necessary rodent habitat that would provide sufficient populations to feed wintering raptors.

Conclusion:in regards to raptor wintering area, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Bat hibemacula: These are found in crevice and cave ecosites (CCR and CCA). There are no cavern or crevice ELC ecosites present within 120 m of the proposed development area.

Conclusion:Bat hibemaculaare not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Bat Maternity Colonies: These colonies are associatedwith forested ecosites. The ongoing logging activity within the subject woodlands make it undesirableas a bat maternity colony. No maternity colonieswere encountered during the ?eld work. Conclusion: Bat maternity colonies are not present and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Bat Migratory Stopover Area: Accordingto Amy Cameron of the MNR, criteria have not yet been developed for identifyingbat movement corridors and therefore they do not need to be considered at this time. The only place in the province currently identifiedas SWH for bat movement corridors is Long Point (Ecoregion 7E) for silver-hairedbats

Conclusion: Bat migratory stopover areas are not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship.

Turtle Wintering Areas: Wintering areas need water that is deep enough not to freeze to the bottom, and to have a soft mud substrate. The water sites within the proposed development area are too shallow to support overwinteringturtles, and are also too far from any known turtle habitat to be used for wintering.

Conclusion: Turtle wintering area areas are not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Reptile hibernaculum: OMNR (2012) notes that sites located below frost line in burrows, rock crevices, and other natural locationsare needed. Broken and fissured rock can provide access to subterraneansites below the frost line. These areas should also have proper moisture levels to keep snakes from drying out during the winter, and south facing slopes are also preferable in providing more moderate winter conditions. None of these site characteristics is present within the

developmentlands.

Conclusion: Signi?cant reptile hibemaculahabitat is not considered to be present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac

Township.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 74 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur_\ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

Services

Colonially-Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat (Bank and Cli?): Nesting sites for these species includeseroding banks/cliffs,sandy hills, pits, steep slopes, rock faces or piles. These attributes do not exist within the developmentarea.

Conclusion: Signi?cant colonial-nestingbird breedinghabitat (bank and cliff) is not considered to be present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Colonially -Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat ( Trees/Shrubs): Nesting occurs in swamp and fen habitats. No colonial nesting was observed in the northwest swamp, nor within 120 m of the developmentarea.

Conclusion: Signi?cant colonial-nestingbird breedinghabitat (trees/shrub) is not considered to be and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship.

present

Colonially -Nesting Bird Breeding Habitat (Ground): Nesting occurs on rocky islands or peninsula within a lake or large river. These features are not present on or within 120 m of the development

area.

Conclusion: Signi?cant colonial-nestingbird breedinghabitat (ground)

present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in

South FrontenacTownship.

is not considered to be compliance with the PPS and policies of

Butter?y migratory route/stopover areas.‘ A butter?y stopover area needs to be a minimumof 10 ha in size with a combinationof ?eld and forest habitat present, and will be located within 5 km of Lake Ontario. This site is greater than 5 km from Lake Ontario.

Conclusion: Butter?y migratory route/stopover habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Landbird migratory stopover areas: To qualify an area must include one of the following ELC codes (FOC, FOM, F OD, SWC, SWM, SWD) and be greater than 10 ha. and within 5 km of lake Ontario. This site is greater than 5 km from Lake Ontario.

Conclusion: Landbird migratory stopover area habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Deer yarding areas: The most important part of a deer yard (Stratum I) that is critical for deer survival. These are mapped by the OMNR and this area has not been identi?ed as a signi?cant deer yarding area.

Conclusion:Deer wintering areas are not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 75 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur§ ESA for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

areas does not ?t any of these criteria.

Conclusion:Deer winter congregation areas are not present and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Summary ofSigni?cant Habitats of Seasonal Concentration Areas: no signi?cant habitat of seasonal concentration was identi?ed on and within 120 In of the development area and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Rare Vegetation Communities: Rare vegetation community types are those with SRANKS of S1 to S3 (i.e., extremely rare rare uncommon in Ontario). OMNR (2012) lists the followingrare types for site region 6E: Cliffs and Talus Slopes, Sand Barren, Savannah, Tallgrass Prairie, Alvar, and Old Growth Forest.

OMNR (2012) also lists Other Rare Vegetation Communities,which are

plant communities that contain Henson and Brodribb (2005) identify the following provincially rare vegetation communities within the Madoc Ecodistrict 6E—10,which includes Sunbury. These include: rare species which depend on the habitat for survival.

White Cedar Jack Pine Shrubby Cinquefoil Treed Alvar Pavement PhiladelphiaPanic Grass False Pennyroyal Alvar Pavement Type Dry Bur Oak Shagbark Hickory Tallgrass Woodland Type Red Cedar Early Buttercup Treed Alvar Grassland Type Common Juniper Fragrant Sumac Hairy Beardtongue Alvar Shrubland Type None of the vegetation communities listed above is found in the developmentarea.

—

——

S1 S1 S1 S2 S2

Summary of Signi?cant Rare Vegetation Community Habitat: Signi?cant rare vegetation communities are not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Specialized Habitats for Wildlife The Ecoregion Criteria Schedules (MNR 2012) lists 5 categories of specialized habitat for wildlife for Site Region 6E. Each of these is discussedbelow in context with what was observed during the site investigations: nesting area: This criterion includeswetland habitats adjacent to upland Waterfowl areas. There is no applicable nesting habitat within 120 m of any wetlands due to ongoing farming activity.

Conclusion: Waterfowl nesting area habitat is not present and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 76 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # SunbunESA for Brett Campbell Ecglogjca] 55,‘ ices

Bald Eagle and Osprey Nesting, Foraging and Perching Habitat: Sites with ELC designations FOD, FOM, SWD, SWM, and SWC that are adjacent to riparian areas are to be considered. Osprey and bald eagle are not present at this site.

Conclusion:Bald eagle, osprey nesting, foragingand perching habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac

Township.

WoodlandRaptor Nesting Habitat: All woodland types are consideredpossible, but they must be greater than 30 ha. in size and have more than 10 ha of interior habitat. There are no woodlands with these characteristics within 120 m of the developmentarea, nor would woodland raptor nesting be expected in a forest experiencing ongoing logging. Conclusion: Woodland raptor nesting habitat is not present and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac

Township.

Turtle Nesting Areas: Turtle nesting areas include exposed sites typically with a southern exposure and with sand or gravel substrates that allow turtles to dig, and are within 100 m of certain wetland habitats. There are no habitats with these characteristicsthat are within 100 m of the developmentarea.

Conclusion: Turtle nesting area habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Seeps and Springs: No seeps or springs were identi?ed within 120 m of the proposed developmentarea.

Conclusion: Seeps and springs are not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac

Township.

Amphibian breeding habitat (woodland): Woodland of ELC classes FOC, F OM, FOD, SWC, SWM, and SWD next to a wetland can be potential amphibian breeding habitat. As well, there must be the presence of breedingpopulation of l or more of the listed species with at least 20 individualspresent. These threshold numbers were not met by the areas with the appropriate ELC classes within the proposed developmentarea.

Conclusion: Signi?cant woodland amphibian breeding habitat is not present and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Amphibian breeding habitat (wetland): To be significant, the presence of breedingpopulation of 3 or more of the listed frog or toad species is needed, and with at least 20 breeding individuals. Amphibian breedingdoes take place in the small wetlands at the southern end of the development property, but these thresholdnumbers were not met.

Conclusion: Signi?cant wetland amphibian breedinghabitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 77 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # SunbunESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

Services

Sunrmatgy ofSpecialized Habitats for Wildlife: Specialized habitatsfor wildlife were not found and in this regards, this developmentwill be in

FrontenacTownship.

compliance with the PPS and policies of South

Habitat for Species of Conservation Concern Categories of habitatthat support species of conservation concern are listed in MNR (2012) for Site Region 6E. Each of these categories is discussedbelow in context observationsmade during the site investigations.

water with emergent aquatic vegetation present. To be signi?cant, the presence of 5 or more nesting pairs of Sedge Wren or Marsh Wren, or breeding by any combinationof 5 or more of the listed species, or any wetland with breedingof l or more Black Terns, Trumpeter Swan, Green Heron or Yellow Rail. None of these breedingthresholdnumbers were met.

Conclusion: Signi?cant marsh breeding bird habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Woodland area —sensitive bird breeding habitat: All mature (>60 years old) natural forest (nonplantation) stands 30 ha or greater in size and with at least 10 ha interior habitat assuming 100 in buffer at edge of forest are to be considered for this criterion. There are no woodlands on or within 120 m of the proposed development area with these characteristics. Conclusion: Woodland area-sensitive bird breeding habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Open country bird breeding habitat: Requires grassland habitat 30 ha or larger in size, that is not Class lor 2 agricultural lands, and not being actively used for farming. All of the lands associated with the development are used for farming.

Conclusion: Signi?cant open country bird breedinghabitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Shrub/early successional bird breeding habitat: Shrubland must be 10 ha or larger in size. There m of the proposed developmentarea.

are no unbroken shrublandsof that size on or within 120

Conclusion: Shrub/early successional bird breedinghabitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Terrestrial Cray?sh: These only occur in SW Ontario. Conclusion: Terrestrial cray?sh habitat is not present and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 78 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur_\‘ESA for Brett Campbell Ecological

Services

Special concern and Rare Wildlife Species: All special concern and provincially rare (S1 to S3) plant and animal species. Special concern species were not observedor expected in the development area due to its locationand disturbednature.

Animal Movement Corridors MNR (2012) denotesamphibian movement corridorsand deer movement corridors in Site Region 6E as areas as potential signi?cant wildlife habitat. Amphibian movement corridors: Amphibian movement corridorsprovide a link between wetland and woodlandbreedinghabitat and summer and fall terrestrial habitat. There are no records of amphibian movement corridors for this site and no habitat or landscape features supportive of signi?cant movements within 120 m of the proposed development.

Conclusion: Amphibian

movement corridors are not considered to be present within 120 m of the proposed development area and in this regards, this development will be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township.

Deer movement corridors: Deer movement corridors are associated with deer wintering habitat (MNR 2012) and a developmentproposed in a Stratum II deer wintering area has the potential to contain corridors. The proposed development area does not have deer wintering habitat and there are also no con?rmed winter deer yards or deer movement corridors reported within 120 m of the proposed

development.

Conclusion: Deer movement corridors are not consideredto be present within 120 m of the proposed developmentarea and in this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South FrontenacTownship. Summary of Animal Movement Corridors: The results of the site investigationdeterminedthat there are no animal movement corridors within 120 m of the proposed development area. In this regards, this developmentwill be in compliance with the PPS and policies of South Frontenac Township. Impact Statement: It was determinedthat signi?cant wildlife habitat is not present within the proposed developmentlands. As such, there will be no negative impacts to signi?cant wildlife habitat from the proposed development.

6.5

Fish Habitat

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 79 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Sunbur} ESA for Bren Campbell Ecological Services

Fish habitat is usually ranked under three quality/sensitivity levels. inhabitedby robust generalists that are typically found in marginal The least valued ?sh habitat is conditions,such as water ?lled road side ditches or small urban ponds such as found here. Fish were observedin the pond, and sticklebacks were caught with a dip net. This species IS tolerant of the marginal habitat conditions existing within this

Impact Summary: The species present are very hardy and are often found in harsher conditions with little or no setbacks throughout the region. A negative impact would only occur if the pond were no longer able to provide habitat for these marginal species. As long as water is not diverted from the pond and there is a reasonable setback distance there will be no negative impact to this marginal ?sh habitat. Silt barriers will be employed between construction areas and the wetland vegetation as is normally required.

References

Henson, B.L. and K.E. Brodribb 2005. Great Lakes Conservation Blueprint for Terrestrial Biodiversity, Volume 2: Ecodistrict Summaries.Nature Conservancy of Canada. Lee, H., W. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig, and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological Land Classi?cation for Southern Ontario. Natural Heritage Information Centre, OMNR

Peterborough.

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.2000. Signi?cant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide. 151 pp. Fish and Wildlife Branch, Technical Section.

Policies of the Provincial Policy Statement,2005. Second Edition. Toronto: Queen Ontario. 248 pp. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2012. Signi?cant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion 6E Criterion Schedule. Draft.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 80 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Addendum to July 2, 2013 Natural Heritage Assessment

Hamlet of Sunbury Subdivision Development Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2

Prepared for Brett Campbell Campbell Land Developments LTD 77 Byron Crescent, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1J1

ECOLOGICAL SERVICES

Rob Snetsinger

February 14, 2019

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 81 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Details

In July 2, 2013 we produced a Natural Heritage Assessment (EIA) on behalf of Brett Campbell, who was proposing to develop vacant land within the Hamlet of Sunbury. Since 2013, one house has been built (see Lot 6 on the adjacent image), and a further 30 are proposed. Since it has been five years since our first EIA was produced, it is our understanding that the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) requested an EIA update. To facilitate that, we visited the site three times in July and August 2018 to determine if there were any notable natural heritage changes since 2013. As was the case in 2013, the proposed area for development is still mostly farmland, which is bordered to the north by more farmland, to the south by residential and commercial properties within Sunbury, to the east by Battersea Rd. and more farmland, and to the west by Gerald Ball Memorial Park. As was the case in 2013, much of the property has been managed for row crops, including soybean and potatoes in 2018 (Figure 2). We summarize significant Natural Heritage features as follows: Species at Risk: No species at risk were found or expected in 2013, or in 2018 because of a lack of good habitat. Significant Wetland: There is no significant wetland on site. There is a provincially significant wetland located about 80 meters from the northwest corner of the property. As was noted in 2013, no negative impacts to the features and functions of this wetland are expected from the development because there are only 3 lots within 120 m, and they are setback a minimum of 80 m. There is also Figure 1. Proposed development.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 82 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

an intervening woodland, intervening farmland, and an intervening farm access road. Combined, these are considered a more than sufficient buffer to prevent a negative impact. Significant Woodland: There are some woodlands on the property, and in 2013 we applied provincial standards to determine their level of significance as the Township of South Frontenac does not have significant woodland mapping. From that assessment, we determined that the woodlands were not significant, and our view on that has not changed. We also noted in 2013 that the woodlands on site had been logged for many years, and this activity has continued for the last five years. Consequently, we estimate that the woodland area has been reduced to less than half of the size evident in 1990 images. Logged areas of the woodland are regenerating with shrubs and tree saplings (see Figure 3). It is our opinion that development of the remaining woodland will not constitute a negative impact as long as tree clearing for the purposes of development takes place outside of the bird breeding season. Although the associated woodland is not considered significant, an attempt to minimize tree loss for the development is recommended for ecological and property value reasons.

Figure 2. Soybean field to be developed.

Figure 3. Shrub and tree regeneration occurring on previously logged land. 3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 83 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Significant Valleyland: No significant valleyland is noted in association with this development. ANSI: No ANSI’s are noted in association with this development. Significant Wildlife Habitat: No significant wildlife habitat was noted in 2013, but Wood Thrush were observed in the cutover areas of the woodland in 2018. These birds were categorized as a Special Concern species in 2014, which makes these areas potential significant wildlife habitat. There is reasonably large population in Eastern Ontario, and changes in wintering habitat outside of Canada are considered one of the main factors in declining numbers. This bird is purportedly a woodland bird, and yet we only observed them in the cut over areas of the development property in 2018, and not the adjacent healthier woodlands of Gerald Ball Memorial Park. However, we have seen Wood Thrush in the park woodland in past years. In this region, we have observed them nesting in a wide range of woodland habitats in Eastern Ontario from relative pristine isolated woodlands, to an urban forest copse. The latter demonstrates their tolerance of nearby human activity. There is no lack of suitable habitat in the region, as untouched woodlands where we once noted them calling are no longer being used. This suggests that habitat loss in the summer (i.e., Canadian) breeding grounds is not an issue. As such, the development of this area would not unduly hinder the ability of the Wood Thrush to breed in this area, as long as forest clearing for the purposes of house building takes place outside of the breeding season (May to early August). This forest clearing restriction would also reduce a potential violation of the Migratory Birds Convention Act. Fish Habitat: In 2013 some fish were observed in a small isolated wetland pond immediately west of the house at 3811 Battersea Rd. We often find fish in these isolated ponds and have often wondered how they get there. In conversations with Dr. John Casselman (senior MNRF fisheries scientist and professor emeritus at Queen’s University), there is much speculation as to the cause such as bait fish castoffs, historical flooding, or egg transfer via waterfowl, but no conclusive answer is known. Any fish that survive in this pond would have to be hardy habitat generalists because of the small size of the pond, shallow water, and low oxygen levels. Since 2013 this region has experienced two severe droughts, which would have either dried up the pond or greatly reduced the water level, which could have killed any fish present. No fish were observed in 2018. Reasonable setbacks of 30 m from the pond are possible, although in our opinion a lesser setback of 15 m would not constitute a potential negative impact because the fish and other species in the pond and surrounding wetland would be impact tolerant to the existing and adjacent urban development, and adjacent farm activity. Regulation 148/06. We don’t normally focus on this Regulation as it is not part of the Natural Heritage assessment process, but are providing information here to assist the CRCA. There is a small isolated black ash swamp located in the northeast corner of the property. In 2013 we recommended a 30 m setback from this approximately 3 ha. swamp. The swamp has remained relatively unchanged since that time and our recommendation for 2018 in this regard is the same. There are three small wetland patches in the southern half of the property. They are shown in Figure 4 as W1, W2, W3, and W4. It should be noted that W2 and W3 are connected, so can be considered a single wetland patch, of approximately 0.9 ha. W1 is about 0.18 ha., and W4 is about 0.17 ha.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 84 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

With the possible exception of W2 (i.e., fish habitat, previously discussed), no significant natural heritage features were evident in the four patches, and the dominant vegetation (canary reed grass and narrow leaved cattail) is impact tolerant. Furthermore, the wetland patches have been associated with and adjacent to Sunbury, Gerald Ball Park, Battersea Rd., and surrounding farmland. Wetland patch W1 may be too small to apply to Regulation 148/06, but it is part of a farm watercourse (see Figure 5). We feel there is sufficient room for a 15 m setback for the associated lots, but this will likely need to be discussed with the CRCA. The access road to the current house on the property runs along the north edge of W1 and the farm watercourse (Figure 6).

Figure 4. ELC map produced in 2013. Note W1, W2, W3, and W4.

Figure 5. W1 and farm watercourse.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 85 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Figure 6. Wetland patch W1 and the farm watercourse can be seen to the left of the road. In Figure 1, the main development roadway can be seen running up the middle of the property and crossing the watercourse. This will also need to be discussed with the CRCA. This road is proposed to connect to Battersea Rd. via the existing farm access point (Figure 7), and to run between W1 and W2. The distance separating these two wetland patches is about 26 m.

Figure 7. Road connection point to Battersea Rd. The intruding shrubby areas on either side of the soybean field are wetland W1 (right side of photo) and wetland W2 (left side of photo). We could not find a water connection for wetland patches W2 and W3 to any watercourse, which may negate their application to Regulation 148/06. Nevertheless, there is likely enough space in the adjacent lots for an appropriate building setback. This will need to be discussed with the CRCA.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 86 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury ESA Addendum for Brett Campbell

Ecological Services

Wetland patch W4 is is the smallest of the four, and we could not find a connection to a watercourse, and therefore Regulation 148/06 may not apply. However, there is likely enough space in the adjacent lots for an appropriate building setback. Road access to Lot 1 would presumably be through the existing farm access route shown in Figure 4. The distance separating W3 and W4 is about 12 m. A culvert would be necessary here.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 87 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PART LOTS 25/26 CONCESSION 2 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC KINGSTON, ON

Submitted to: 2628100 Ontario Inc. 19 Deer Creek Drive Elginburg, ON K0H 1M0

Prepared by: BluMetric Environmental Inc. 4 Cataraqui Street The Tower, The Woolen Mill Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7

Project Number: 190248 August 2019

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 88 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PART LOTS 25/26 CONCESSION 2, TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC KINGSTON, ON

Submitted to:

2628100 Ontario Inc. 19 Deer Creek Drive Elginburg, ON K0H 1M0

Prepared by:

BluMetric Environmental Inc. 4 Cataraqui Street The Woolen Mill, The Tower Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7

Project Number: 190248 Augut 2019

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 89 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.

INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1.1

STUDY METHOD …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

1.1.1 1.1.2 2.

Water Supply Evaluation ……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Servicing Options Statement ……………………………………………………………………….. 2

HYDROGEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………………………………… 2 2.1 SITE PHYSIOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE ……………………………………………………………………….. 2 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2.2.1 2.2.2

Bedrock Geology ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Surficial Geology ………………………………………………………………………………………. 3

2.3 HYDROGEOLOGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2.3.1 2.3.2

Site Hydrogeology ……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Well Interference………………………………………………………………………………………. 5

2.4 WATER QUALITY ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 2.4.1 2.4.2 3.

Bacteriological Results ……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 General Chemistry Results ………………………………………………………………………….. 9

SERVICING OPTIONS STATEMENT ………………………………………………………………….. 12 3.1 PROXIMITY OF EXISTING SERVICES ………………………………………………………………………….. 13 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SUITABILITY AND EVALUATION ……………………………………………………….. 13 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4

Water Supply ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Performance of Services in Similar Developments ………………………………………….. 14 Private Servicing ………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Nitrate Attenuation ………………………………………………………………………………….. 14

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS …………………………………………………………………….. 15 4.1 HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDY ………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 4.2 SERVICING OPTIONS STATEMENT ……………………………………………………………………………. 17

STUDY LIMITATIONS …………………………………………………………………………………….. 17

REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18

Page i

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 90 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Table 2: Table 3: Table 4: Table 5: Table 6:

Summary of Well Construction …………………………………………………………………….. 4 Aquifer Test Results ……………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Well Interference Results …………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Bacteriological Parameter Results Summary ……………………………………………………. 9 General Chemistry Results ………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Nitrate Attenuation from septic systems ……………………………………………………….. 14

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3:

Site Location Map Site Property Test Well Locations

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F:

MECP Water Well Records and Permission to Monitor Letters Photo Sheets Pumping Test Drawdown vs. Time Plots Aquifer Test – Transmissivity Results Analytical Reports Sodium Level Advisory to KFL&A Health Unit

Page ii

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 91 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

INTRODUCTION

BluMetric Environmental Inc. (BluMetricTM) was retained by Steve McLure and James Sabourin to conduct a Hydrogeological Assessment for a proposed development. We understand the proposed development consists of potentially thirty-one (31) lots (31 SFD units) on approximately 31.6 hectares (78 acres). The residential lots will be serviced by private water wells and septic systems and will be located on Development Part Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Township of South Frontenac, as shown on Figures 01 and 02. The scope of work was based on requirements outlined in the Ministry of Environment (MOE), now Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), documents: Procedure D-5-4 Technical Guideline for Individual

On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment, last revised August 1996, and Procedure D-5-5 Technical Guideline for Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment, last revised August 1996. This report summarizes the results of an investigation of the geology, physiography and the study of groundwater occurrence, quantity and quality available. The study addresses the ability of the groundwater aquifer to provide adequate quantities of potable water for the proposed development. No terrain assessment was completed as part of this study as it was previously conducted in 2011. Marginal aquifer yields were indicated for some test wells during the previous site investigations. This study looked to address the issues previously identified and the ability for groundwater sources to provide adequate quantities of potable water for residential supply. 1.1

STUDY METHOD

The study was completed by reviewing pertinent literature and maps and by conducting on-site field investigations including a site visit and constant discharge pumping tests to evaluate potential water supplies and possible well interference. The previous hydrogeological work on the property was discussed with the Peer Reviewer prior to commencing the work. The potential for adverse mutual well interference by water takings in the proposed development as well as potential adverse interference to existing well water supplies located to the north and east. The work program included communication with existing homeowners and the inclusion of existing domestic wells as observation wells during aquifer testing. The previous investigation (XCG, 2011) found potential water quality issues and water quantity issues requiring further assessment. These issues were addressed by the developer by installing deeper wells cased and sealed into the sandstone bedrock.

Page 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 92 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

1.1.1

190248 August 2019

Water Supply Evaluation

The water supply evaluation was completed as prescribed in Procedure D-5-5 which indicates at least five test wells are required for a property up to 40 hectares. Furthermore, the aerial distribution of test wells must be such that hydrogeological conditions are adequately represented. The total area of the subject property is 31.6 ha. Test well locations are shown on Figure 03. For this study it was proposed that six test wells be used to determine the hydrogeological conditions across the site. Constant discharge pumping tests were completed on six test wells to determine water quality, aquifer characteristics and potential well interference. Water samples were collected at five of the test wells during the constant discharge pumping tests. Water samples were not collected at the 6th well due to insufficient water quantity. The water samples were analysed for the water quality parameters outlined in Procedure D-5-5 as well as some additional general chemistry parameters. Water quality field measurements for free chlorine residual and turbidity were also obtained during aquifer testing. Well interference was assessed by monitoring the test wells; the drawdown and recovery in the pumping well and nearby drilled domestic supply wells were recorded. 1.1.2

Servicing Options Statement

A Servicing Options Statement is required as per Procedure D-5-3. The objective of the Servicing Options Statement is to determine whether servicing of the proposed development on full municipal services and communal sewage and water services is a viable option. The assessment was developed based on the results of the hydrogeological assessment and previous terrain analysis investigations and the review of existing data.

HYDROGEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT

2.1

SITE PHYSIOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE

The subject property is located approximately 13 kilometres north of the City of Kingston (Figure 01). The physiography is Precambrian shield typified by irregular topography. Drainage direction can be generalized as southwest towards Collins Lake but localized gullies, elevated areas and valley features present significant opportunity for infiltration (Ontario Geological Survey (OGS, 2010), and with sloping to the southeast towards some low lying wet areas 2010. The property is bounded by Battersea Road to the east. The property is bounded to the north, west and east by agricultural land and residential properties.

Page 2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 93 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

The topography of the subject property varies and ranges from approximately 121 metres above sea level (masl) along the north boundary, to approximately 139 masl in the north-central portion of the property at TW3, to 126 masl in the south area of the property. The subject property boundary is shown on Figure 02. 2.2

SITE GEOLOGY

Geology was assessed by reviewing provincial geology maps, MECP Well Records for wells in the area, and the previous investigations done on the property (XCG, 2013). The location of the six test wells are shown in Figure 03 and the well records for each are included in Appendix A. 2.2.1

Bedrock Geology

The subject property is underlain by Ordovician/Cambrian consisting of clastic carbonate sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks (OGS, 2011). This description is consistent with the description of bedrock encountered during the drilling of the test wells on the property (a thin layer of shale underlain by several layers of limestone and then sandstone at depth). These are characterized as conglomerate, sandstone, shale, and dolostone, as well as metasedimentary marble, calc-silicate, skarn and tectonic breccias. 2.2.2

Surficial Geology

Overburden in the area is generalized as being glaciolacustrine in origin (OGS, 2010), primarily clay with minor sand and gravel. The stratigraphy can be generally described as a thin layer of topsoil overlying sandy clay of variable thickness (up to approximately 4.2 m). The depth to bedrock encountered on-site ranged from 0.3 to 4.2 mbgs (metres below ground surface). 2.3

HYDROGEOLOGY

2.3.1

Site Hydrogeology

Four new test wells (TW1, TW2, TW3, and TW4) were installed between January 10 and January 30, 2019. Two existing wells were also tested (TW2-EXP and TW4-EXP) both of which were installed on October 18, 2010 by Jack Knox Well Drilling of Glenburnie, Ontario1. Wells were drilled as 0.254 m (10”) diameter to a depth of 12.8m (42’), 52’), 64’, 64’ and 86’ and then 0.152 m (6”) diameter from that depth to end of hole. Casing was installed and grouted in place to a minimum depth of 12.8 mbgs (42’) with one well cased as deep as 26.2mbgs (86’). Well construction conforms to O. Reg. 903.

Page 3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 94 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

A previous site assessment had identified substandard groundwater quality and/or quantity in shallower aquifers. A summary of test well construction is presented in Table 1 and well records are included in Appendix 1. Table 1: Test Well TW1 TW2 TW3 TW4 TW2-EXP TW4-EXP

Summary of Well Construction MECP Well Record Number A255558 A255562 A255563 A255564 A100294 A100298

Approx. Ground elevation (masl) 127.529 128.124 139.012 126.152 121.159 126.488

Approx. Bedrock Elevation (masl) 122.65 126.60 136.57 123.41 113.23 125.27

Well bottom elevation (masl) 127.53 128.12 139.01 126.15 121.16 126.49

Well Completed In Sandstone Sandstone Sandstone Sandstone Sandstone Sandstone

Depth water found at (masl) 91.56 112.88 92.38 83.78 107.59 102.26

105.57 86.89 79.21 86.56 99.52

The six test wells and the observation wells (which were existing drilled domestic supply wells) are shown on Figure 03. BluMetric staff completed a 6-hour constant discharge pumping test on five test wells in June 2019. The pumping test for a sixth well (TW4) was terminated after 130 minutes. Photographs of the test wells and testing are provided in Appendix B. Water levels in the pumping well and observation wells were recorded using barometrically corrected Solinst Level Loggers and manual water level measurements were recorded using an electronic Solinst water level tape. A Hanna C114 multimeter was used to measure free residual chlorine and water turbidity in the discharge water. The results of the constant discharge tests are discussed below and the plots of the data are included in Appendix C. The testing schedule, test configuration and aquifer test results are summarized in Table 2. Table 2:

Aquifer Test Results

Parameter MECP Well ID Date of Pumping Test Pumping Rate (L/min) Pumping Rate (USgpm) Stick Up (m) Depth of Well (mbgs) Static Water Level (mbTOC) Static Water Level (mbgs)

Test Well TW1

TW2

TW3

TW4

TW2-EXP

TW4-EXP

A255558 04-Jun-19

A255562 06-Jun-19

A255563 30-May-19

A255564 29-May-19

A100294 27-May-19

A100298 03-Jun-19

19.00

21.73

19.30

11.43

19.23

15.14

5.02

5.74

5.1

3.02

5.08

0.6

0.68

0.72

0.85

0.65

0.5

42.67

24.38

48.8

24.38

42.67

11.59

10.73

22.02

9.54

3.53

9.74

10.99

10.05

21.3

8.69

2.88

9.24

Page 4

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 95 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

Parameter

190248 August 2019 Test Well

TW1

TW2

TW3

TW4

TW2-EXP

TW4-EXP

Height of Water Column (m) Static Well Volume (L) Duration of Pumping (min)

31.68

14.33

32.7

40.11

21.5

33.43

577.89

261.54

596.81

732.05

392.40

610.13

360

130

360

450

Volume Pumped (L)

6,840

7,821

6,949

1,486

6,922

6,813

Max. Drawdown Observed (m)

8.85

0.21

2.9

31.46

0.37

19.09

Recovery Time (min)

620

880

121

260

12.03

10.74

22.17

29.887

3.55

9.80

95

1.05E-05

1.29E-03

5.86E-05

1.35E-06

1.16E-03

3.76E-06

Recovery Water Level (mbTOC) Percent Recovery (%) Transmissivity (m2/s)

Note: L/min = litres per minute, USgpm = US gallons per minute, mbTOC = metres below top of casing

Transmissivity values were calculated from the pumping test data using the Theis solution included in the Aquifer Test version 8.0 software package. These analyses allowed for assumptions such as a confined aquifer, uniform hydraulic conductivity, and isotropic hydraulic conductivity conditions. Assumptions are generally valid and the fit was good and can be considered representative. The average transmissivity (geometric mean of results) for the five successful test wells was 4.21E-04 m2/sec. Data analyses are included in Appendix D. Transmissivity provides an indication of how much water can be transmitted horizontally and hence the ability of a well to be a useable source. More insightful on the practical yield of the well is the amount of drawdown observed in the pumping well while pumping and the water level recovery time to static conditions once pumping ceases. Results from each of the constant discharge pumping tests indicate that 5 of the test wells provide adequate amounts of water, while one did not. 2.3.2

Well Interference

The potential for well interference as an adverse effect for existing aquifer users was assessed by monitoring the drawdown in the pumping wells and nearby test wells. Several neighbouring property owners responded to the letters sent out. The following properties granted well access for monitoring during pumping tests: 3769 Battersea (Sunbury Store), 3779 Battersea Road, 2863 Battersea Road, 3917 Battersea Road, 3929 Battersea Road, 3000 Randy Clark Road, and 3008 Randy Clark Road. Upon inspecting the wells certain wells could not be accessed or could not Page 5

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 96 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

have a logger installed due to pump placement or other physical restrictions. Wells that could not be used for the study included 3769 Battersea, 3779 Battersea, and 3929 Battersea. Letters documenting permission to monitor are included in Appendix A. The domestic supply wells remained in normal use (i.e. servicing the home) during the constant discharge pumping tests and therefore, results reflect potential interference under actual well use conditions. Short periods of drawdown in the water level at the domestic supply well followed by quick recovery reflect the pump in the well cycling on and off to re-pressurize the water supply system in the home. Water levels in the pumping well and observation wells (Table 3) were measured and stored using barometrically corrected Solinst Level Loggers with data acquisition every minute during the constant discharge pumping test and during recovery. Plots of the water levels in the pumping well and the observation wells for each of the constant discharge pumping tests are included in Appendix C. Summary of results for each test are presented below. No adverse well interference issues are anticipated for the proposed development based on analysis of the data. Table 3:

Well Interference Results Pumping Well: TW1 Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m)

Distance from Pumping Well (m)

154.6

19.0 8.85 3917 Battersea 82.6

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

0.025

0.00*

Observation Wells

3863 Battersea

TW4-EXP 299.8 0.01

Pumping Well: TW2 Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m) Observation Wells Distance from Pumping Well (m)

21.72 0.21 TW3 271.7

TW2-EXP 218.4

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

0.046

0.045

Pumping Well: TW2-EXP Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m) Observation Wells Distance from Pumping Well (m)

19.23 0.37

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

TW2 218.4

TW3 372.9

0.006

Pumping Well: TW3 Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m) Observation Wells Distance from Pumping Well (m)

19.30 2.90 TW2 271.7

3917 Battersea 175.9

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

0.00

0.00*

Page 6

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 97 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

Pumping Well: TW4 Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m) Observation Well Distance from Pumping Well (m)

11.43 31.46 3799 Battersea 261.3

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

0.00 Pumping Well: TW4-EXP

Pumping test rate (L/min) Max Drawdown Observed (m) Observation Wells Distance from Pumping Well (m)

15.14 19.09 TW4 261.3

3799 Battersea 200.9

Max Drawdown Observed (m)

0.00

0.00*

Note: *Indicates groundwater elevations decreased due to personal consumption from the homeowner and not from the pumping tests.

TW1 pumping test:   

Approximately 0.366 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 19.23 L/min. Approximately 0.006 m of drawdown in 3863 Battersea Road and 0.01 m in TW4-EXP attributable to pumping activities. Drawdown observed at 3917 Battersea Road attributable to domestic use. No interference from pumping test.

TW2 pumping test:  

Approximately 0.180 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 19.3 L/min. Approximately 0.046 m of drawdown in TW2-EXP and 0.045 m in TW3 attributable to pumping activities.

TW2-EXP pumping test:  

Approximately 0.370 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 19.23 L/min. Approximately 0.006 m and 0.006 m of drawdown in TW2 and TW3, respectively, attributable to pumping activities.

TW3 pumping test:   

Approximately 2.90 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 19.30 L/min. No interference observed in TW2 attributable to pumping activities. Drawdown observed at 3917 Battersea Road attributable to domestic use. No interference from pumping test. Page 7

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 98 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

TW4 pumping test:   

Approximately 31.46 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 11.43 L/min. Insufficient capability to meet requirements. No interference observed in 3799 Battersea Road attributable to pumping activities.

TW4-EXP pumping test:    2.4

Approximately 19.09 m of drawdown in pumping well during the test at 15.14 L/min. Drawdown observed at 3799 Battersea Road is attributable to domestic use. No interference from pumping test. No interference observed in TW4 attributable to pumping activities. WATER QUALITY

Procedure D-5-5 specifies that sufficient water quality samples must be collected and analysed for each pumping test to sufficiently determine the physical, chemical and bacteriological quality of the water. Water samples were collected at the 180 minute and 360 minute times during pumping for each of the six-hour constant discharge pumping tests. The sample for TW4-EXP was collected at 450 minutes however, due to the pumping rate. The samples were collected in clean, dedicated single-use bottles supplied by the analysing laboratory, stored in coolers at approximately 4 degrees Celsius until delivery to the laboratory. All water samples were submitted to AGAT Laboratories of Kingston, Ontario for analysis. AGAT Laboratories is accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA). A copy of the laboratory results are provided in Appendix E. Table 4 summarizes the biological indicator parameter results including those required by Procedure D-5-5. Table 5 summarizes the full general chemistry analytical data and identify any parameters that exceed the Ontario Ministry of the Environment’s Drinking Water Standards, Objectives and Guidelines (ODWSOG) criteria. 2.4.1

Bacteriological Results

All wells were disinfected prior to the constant discharge pumping tests by chlorinating the well with chlorine bleach and re-circulating the water in the well to bring the residual free chlorine concentration in the water to between 200 and 250 mg/L. After a minimum of 24 hours of contact time, the well was pumped to discharge until the residual free chlorine concentration in the water was zero (below detection limits of 0.05 mg/L) and the well was allowed to recover. Water quality samples were collected after one hour of pumping and just prior to the completion of the pumping test, at which time the residual chlorine concentration was tested again and was below detection. A summary of bacteriological results may be found below in Table 4, and laboratory results reports are included in Appendix E. Page 8

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 99 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

Table 4:

190248 August 2019

Bacteriological Parameter Results Summary

Test Well TW2 EXP-6 hour TW3-6 hour TW4-EXP-7.5 hour TW1 – 6 hour TW2-6 hour

Sampling Date

Units

2019-05-27 2019-05-30

CFU/100mL CFU/100mL

ND ND ND

Parameter Total Coliforms ODWSOG Criteria ND ND ND

2019-06-03

CFU/100mL

2019-06-04 2019-06-06

CFU/100mL CFU/100mL

ND ND

ND 1

ND ND

Escherichia coli

Fecal Coliform ND ND ND

Notes: ND - Not Detected

Formatted cell with bold value indicates result exceeds ODWSOG Objective/Guideline

Bacteriological results were within ODWSOG limits for TW1-6 hour, TW2-EXP-6 hour, TW3-6 hour, and TW4-EXP-7.5 hour tests. The bacteriological results from TW2-6 hour yielded one (1) counts of Total Coliforms per 100 mL of sample. Faecal Coliform and E.coli results were not detected. While the stated ODWSOG for Total Coliform is 0 counts per 100 mL of sample, it is recognized that the objective has been set as an indicator of inadequate disinfection within the distribution systems associated with water works. For private water wells not subject to approval under the OWRA, the MECP and Health Units have historically used the limit of less than five (5) counts per 100 mL in the absence of a chlorine residual as indicating acceptable water quality. For the purposes of the assessment described by Procedure D-5-5, Total Coliform counts of less than six (6) per 100 mL of sample (and 0 for E. coli and faecal coliforms) shall be considered as indicative of acceptable water quality. The bacteriological results from TW2 meet this condition and as such the water can be considered acceptable with respect to bacteriological assessment. Treatment systems for the disinfection of raw water prior to use is recommended. 2.4.2

General Chemistry Results

General chemistry results are listed in Table 5. Laboratory reports are included in Appendix E. Values exceeding the respective ODWSOG are indicated by shading and bold text. The series of footnotes found at the bottom of the table provides additional details for some parameters.

Page 9

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 100 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Hydrogeological and Terrain Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 268100 Ontario Inc.

Table 5:

190248 August 2019

General Chemistry Results

PARAMETER

Units

RDL

Type Conductivity

uS/cm

TW1 - 3hour

TW1 - 6hour

TW2-3hour

TW2-6hour

TW2 EXP3hour

TW2 EXP6hour

TW3-3hour

TW3-6hour

TW4 EXP 3hour

TW4 EXP 7.5hour

2019-06-04

2019-06-06

2019-05-27

2019-05-30

2019-06-03

19P475294

19P476557

19P475294

19P472425

19P473682

19P475135

651

564

565

687

716

745

757

761

921

902

6.5-8.5

7.79

7.52

7.8

7.81

7.87

7.77

7.8

7.73

7.92

7.78

100

181

288

287

155

368

364

313

299

403

383

ODWSOG Limit

pH Units

Hardness as CaCO3

mg/L

0.5

TDS

mg/L

500

342

280

284

356

468

460

416

412

512

490

Alkalinity as CaCO3

mg/L

30-500

294

288

289

308

353

356

322

324

286

282

Fluoride

mg/L

0.1

MAC

1.5/2.4

0.95

<0.05

1.29

<0.25

0.15

0.24

0.49

0.47

Chloride

mg/L

0.2

250

25.3

4.92

5.04

27.9

27.2

45.1

44.8

114

108

N-NO3 (Nitrate)

mg/L

0.1

MAC

<0.10

1.25

1.28

<0.10

1.19

1.4

<0.10

<0.25

N-NO2 (Nitrite)

mg/L

0.1

MAC

<0.10

<0.05

<0.10

<0.25

<0.10

<0.25

Sulphate

mg/L

0.2

500

20.3

14.4

14.6

23.4

36.1

36.5

31.1

32.9

32.6

N-NH3 (Ammonia)

mg/L

0.02

0.13

<0.02

0.16

<0.02

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

mg/L

0.1

0.24

0.41

0.36

0.34

<0.10

0.18

0.15

Dissolved Organic Carbon

mg/L

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.5

4.1

5.2

Phenols

mg/L

0.001

<0.001

Hydrogen Sulphide

mg/L

0.05

<0.05

Colour

TCU

Turbidity

NTU

0.5

2.7

<0.5

8.3

<0.5

0.6

11.2

3.8

mg phenol/L

0.1

<0.1

0.1

0.2

<0.1

0.1

<0.1

Calcium

mg/L

0.05

50.8

87.6

87.2

43.3

94.7

89.9

84.8

103

97.3

Magnesium

mg/L

0.05

Sodium*

mg/L

0.05

Potassium

mg/L

0.05

Iron

mg/L

0.01

0.3

0.233

Manganese

mg/L

0.002

0.05

0.013

Tannin & Lignin

20/200

13.1

16.7

11.3

31.9

31.3

21.6

21.2

35.4

69.7*

3.49

3.54

98.5*

19.1

17.9

25.1*

24.2*

19.8

15.7

4.51

0.86

0.88

5.46

2.33

2.19

3.26

3.17

5.16

<0.010

0.546

<0.010

0.297

0.259

1.06

0.314

<0.002

0.015

0.01

0.009

0.008

0.043

0.027

0.153

2.51

3.84

5.85

8.33

3.22

5.19

Page 10

BluMetric

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 101 of 320

Ion Balance % NA 2.15 2.99 3.37 Notes: ODWSOG: Ontario Drinking-Water Standards, Objectives and Guidelines, June 2003 OG: Operational Guideline. AO: Aesthetic Objective. MAC: Maximum Acceptable Concentration Shaded cell with bold value indicates results exceeds ODWSOG Objective/Guideline

Medical officer of health advisory if sodium exceeds 20 mg/L. Sodium AO is 200 mg/L RDL - Reported Detection Limit Hydrogen Sulphide is reported as a calculated value based on the Sulphide concentration determined by colorimetric method.

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

Overall water quality was good with some operational and aesthetic parameters elevated, which is not atypical for wells in this area. Elevated hardness levels were found in all five test wells sampled. The ODWSOG states that water hardness above 300 mg/L are considered “very hard” and only untreated water with hardness “in excess of 500 mg/L are unacceptable for most domestic purposes.” Elevated hardness may adversely affect the efficiency and effectiveness of treatment, disinfection and distribution and may result in the formation of scale deposits. Elevated hardness is treatable with a water softener. The results are within the concentration ranges that are considered treatable and all wells had hardness levels below the ODWSOG designation of “very hard” water. The concentration of TDS in TW4-EXP after 3 hours marginally exceeded the Aesthetic Objective (AO) but cleared after 7.5 hours of pumping. The concentration of Dissolved Organic Carbon in TW2-EXP after 6 hours marginally exceeded the Aesthetic Objective (AO) of 5mg/L with 5.2mg/L. The concentration of iron at TW1 after 3 hours, TW4-EXP after 3 hours and TW4-EXP 6 hours of pumping was marginally above the Aesthetic Objective (AO). Excessive levels of iron in drinking water supplies may impart a brownish colour to laundered goods, plumbing fixtures and the water itself; it may produce a bitter, astringent taste in water and beverages; and the precipitation of iron can also promote the growth of iron bacteria in service pipes. Installation of a conventional water softener can remove up to 1 mg/L of iron. Other commercially available water systems are available that can treat iron levels up to 10 mg/L. Sodium concentrations at TW1 3hr, TW2 6hr, TW3 3hr and TW3 6hr were well below the Aesthetic Objective (AO) of 200 mg/L but did exceed 20 mg/L where the medical officer of health is to be advised (regarding patients with low sodium dietary requirements) and a letter indicating this has been sent to the Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Public Health unit, attention Dr. Kieran Moore. A copy of this letter is included as Appendix F. Given that the other parameters exceeding ODWSOG criteria were not health related and within the concentration ranges that are considered treatable, the quality of the water derived from the aquifer is judged to be a suitable water supply for this development. It is recommended that the quality of water from the supply wells be monitored, and treated as necessary and that appropriate disinfection treatment is included in any drinking water system.

Page 11

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 102 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

RECOMMENDED WELL DESIGN The construction of water supply wells must, as a minimum, comply with the specifications of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 903 (and subsequent amendments), and municipal requirements, if any. Based on the results from the hydrogeological investigation described within Section 2 above, the sandstone bedrock aquifer is characterized by suitable quantity and quality for the construction of water supply wells throughout the proposed subdivision at depths of up to approximately 87 m below ground surface. However, as noted in Section 4, to obtain the best well water quality it is recommended, if possible, that water wells not exceed a depth of 30 m, particularly for lots in the Lakefield Drive Area. Based on the information gathered, the following comments can be made regarding the wells:   

 

The wells were constructed using 12 - 26 metres of steel casing with a 0.159 m diameter; The depth of the casing will depend on the water and geology encountered during drilling; The white sandstone formation appears to produce the highest quantity and quality of groundwater in the area. Casing to this formation is recommended to isolate it as the water supply. Shallower and deeper formations have yielded poor water quality. Top of casing extends at least 0.40 m above ground surface; and Cement grout sealing to be installed to 12-26 mbgs.

Upon reviewing the well record and completing a site visit, the test wells meet O.Reg. 903.

SERVICING OPTIONS STATEMENT

The Ontario Government’s Provincial Policy Statement (Section 1.3.1.1) identifies a servicing hierarchy of which municipal sewage services and municipal water services (connected to a centralized water and waste water treatment facility) are the preferred form of servicing for settlement areas. The objective of the Servicing Options Statement is to determine whether servicing of the proposed development on full municipal services and communal sewage and water services is a viable option. The assessment addresses the following concerns as outlined in Procedure D-5-3: 



An evaluation of the proximity of existing or committed full municipal services and the ultimate potential for future connection to full municipal services for the whole area proposed for development. An overview of the environmental suitability of the site for the proposed services, which generally addresses:

Page 12

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 103 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

 

3.1

190248 August 2019

o Environmental constraints (e.g., environmental features, surface water, groundwater). o Suitability of the terrain (e.g., soils, topography) o Performance of services in similar developments in the surrounding area. o The scale, density and type of use proposed for the development. Evaluation of the relative potential and merit of each of the servicing options to serve the proposed development. Documentation of the decision-making process and rationale that led to the determination of the servicing option proposed for the development. PROXIMITY OF EXISTING SERVICES

Currently, there are no municipal water or sewage systems in close proximity to the subject property. Currently, there are no plans to extend the sewer and water systems. Existing residential development on adjacent lands are serviced by private septic and well water supply. 3.2

ENVIRONMENTAL SUITABILITY AND EVALUATION

The subject property is located in a generally rural area. Regions around the subject property consist of lakes, agricultural land and dispersed forests. Unit sizes in the proposed development have been designed to adequately maintain setback requirements. 3.2.1

Water Supply

As discussed in section 2.4.1 for private water wells not subject to approval under the OWRA, the MECP and Health Units have historically used the limit of less than five (5) counts per 100 mL in the absence of a chlorine residual as indicating acceptable water quality. For the purposes of the assessment described by Procedure D-5-5, Total Coliform counts of less than six (6) per 100 mL of sample (and 0 for E. coli and faecal coliforms) shall be considered as indicative of acceptable water quality. The bacteriological results from TW2 meet this condition and as such the water can be considered acceptable with respect to bacteriological assessment. Treatment systems for the disinfection of raw water prior to use is recommended. Based on this assessment, servicing by individual private well water supply is the preferred option. The large lot sizes (greater than 0.60ha) and low development density will mitigate potential for well interference between properties.

Page 13

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 104 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

3.2.2

190248 August 2019

Performance of Services in Similar Developments

There are no existing municipal services within approximately 11 km of the subject property. Development with municipal servicing/infrastructure is not practical given the low population base and high infrastructure cost with low density land development. Private servicing by individual wells and sewage systems for rural development is commonplace throughout Ontario and the Kingston environs and is a viable option for the subject property. 3.2.3

Private Servicing

The proposed development is suitable for private services since there is a low development density. Unit sizes are considered sufficient for placement of private servicing while causing minimal impact to the environment and maintaining the enjoyment of the setting. 3.2.4

Nitrate Attenuation

Table 6:

Nitrate Attenuation from septic systems Parameters Annual Precipitation (P) =

0.951

Units m/year

Runoff (Q) = Evapotranspiration(E) = Infiltration/groundwater recharge (R) =

7 63 30

% % %

20 20000 3450 31 39036.75 315655 60% 189393 54033.82 39036.75 54034 780735000 8388.63

mg/L mg/m3 L /day

m2 m /year m3/year m3/year mg/year mg/m3

8.39

mg/L

Concentration of Nitrate = Concentration of Nitrate = Daily Flow rate of Sewage = Number of units = Yearly Sewage Volume (Sy) = Total Property Surface Area = % Pervious Area = Infiltration Surface Area (Ad) =

Infiltration Flux, R Yearly Volume of Sewage (Sy) = Yearly Volume of Infiltration (R) = Yearly Mass Loading of Nitrate (My) = Nitrate Conc.at Downgradient Prop. Boundary = " =

Information Source/Calculation Canadian Climate Normals 19812010 Station Data, Kingston Pumping Station For Fine Sandy Loam / Pasture & Shrubs - Table 3.1: Hydrologic Cycle Component Values, (MOE Stormwater Mangement Planning and Design Manual, March 2003) Assessing the Potential for Groundwater Impact, MOE July 1992

m3/year m2

Page 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

R=P-Q-E

My/(Sy + R)

BluMetric

Page 105 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

Existing levels of nitrates in the groundwater are all <1.3mg/L. Given that the historical land use was agricultural fields one might expect elevated nitrate levels, however the values are within D5-4 requirements of <10mg/L. The evapotranspiration surplus of water that contributes to groundwater recharge and nitrate dilution was used to calculate the nitrate concentration at the downgradient property boundary. A terrain assessment was completed by XCG in 2010 (XCG, 2013). As part of the assessment 31 test pits were excavated across the site. The terrain analysis indicated overburden on the site ranges from 0.18 to more than 2.4 m in thickness. Grain size analyses indicated that overburden material at the site is a organic topsoil layer typically 0.20m thick underlain by silty or sandy clay traces of gravel in some areas; the silty clay extended to the bedrock in most location. Percolation testing was conducted in the field and it was concluded that the low permeability of the overburden materials and relatively shallow depth of bedrock will require the construction of fully raised leaching bed systems.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The results of a hydrogeological study for the proposed development of the subject property include the following key points: 4.1

HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDY

Long-term sustainable yield and potential well interference was evaluated by six-hour constant rate discharge tests on five test wells. One of the six proposed test wells was determined to be unsuitable for use. Analysis of the drawdown and recovery data indicates that all of the five test wells can provide adequate supply for the proposed development type. Well interference was assessed through monitoring water levels in observation wells installed to similar depths in bedrock and located on the subject property as well as a domestic supply well located adjacent to the property. No unacceptable degree of well interference was observed amongst the observation wells including neighbouring domestic supply wells for the constant discharge pumping tests and therefore, no well interference issues are anticipated for the proposed development. The construction of water supply wells must, as a minimum, comply with the specifications of O. Reg. 903 (and subsequent amendments), and municipal requirements, if any. Based on the results from the hydrogeological investigation described within Section 4 above, the sandstone bedrock aquifer is characterized by suitable quantity and quality for the construction of water supply wells

Page 15

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 106 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

throughout the proposed subdivision when grouted at approximately 35 m below ground surface. The sandstone aquifer provides the best available water quality in the proposed development. Chemical analyses of the groundwater samples collected during the constant discharge tests indicate that the quality of the groundwater is suitable for domestic supply: 

Some aesthetic and operational guidelines were exceeded at some wells (Hardness, TDS, Iron, Turbidity ) but concentrations are well within treatable limits;  No health parameters exceeded the ODWSOG criteria;  Bacteriological results are deemed acceptable, either meeting the ODWSOG criteria or in the case of TW2 results are below the limit set by the MECP and Health Unit for private water wells not subject to approval under the OWRA, as well as meeting the assessment described by Procedure D-5-5;  It is recommended that water supply wells only be advanced to a depth where adequate flow is encountered as poorer quality water has been encountered at depth at this site and in the area in general;  It is recommended that wells be cased and sealed at least 1 metre into the sandstone bedrock. For the existing wells this has been to a minimum depth of 12mbgs (42’);  The white sandstone formation appears to produce the highest quantity and quality of groundwater in the area. Casing to this formation is recommended to isolate it as the water supply. Shallower and deeper formations have yielded poor water quality.  It is also recommended that all water supply systems have treatment systems which include disinfection and any pre-disinfection filtration required as determined by the treatment system designer.  It is recommended to future homeowners that newly constructed wells be pumped for a minimum of 12 hours after construction to ensure adequate well development and to reduce groundwater turbidity and colour to acceptable levels prior to connection to the residences plumbing system.  It is recommended that well owners complete regular well inspections to ensure the well is consistently maintained to meet the requirements of O.Reg. 903. The inspection should verify the well cap is firmly in place, that no ground settlement or erosion has developed around the well casing and should verify there are no potential sources of contamination near the well, such as downspouts directing water towards the well, seasonal ponding in the vicinity of the well or the presence of animal wastes near the well location. Well maintenance guidelines are provided in Chapter 11 of the MECP document, ‘Water Supply Wells – Requirements and Best Management Practices” (Revised April 2015) available at: http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/water-supply-wells-requirements-and-bestpractices Page 16

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 107 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

4.2

190248 August 2019

SERVICING OPTIONS STATEMENT

Municipal servicing for the proposed development is impractical. The area is rural and individual water and septic services are utilized on properties in the vicinity of the subject property. Test wells installed as part of this investigation indicate suitable quantity and water quality to support the proposed development. Private water and waste water servicing is the preferred and recommended option for the proposed development.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The conclusions presented in the above captioned report represent our professional opinion, in light of the terms of reference, scope of work, and the limiting conditions noted herein. The findings presented in this report are based on conditions observed at the specified dates and locations, the analysis of samples for the specified parameters, and information obtained for this project. Unless otherwise stated, the findings cannot be extended to previous or future site conditions, locations that were not investigated directly, or types of analysis not performed. BluMetric makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by others, or of conclusions and recommendations predicated on the accuracy of that information. Nothing in this report is intended to constitute or provide a legal opinion. This report describes the site conditions and observations made by the BluMetric team at the time of the site investigation and have been prepared solely for the use of the client. No other party may use or rely upon the above-captioned report or portion thereof without the express written consent of BluMetric. BluMetric will consent to any reasonable request to approve the use of this report by other parties as “Approved Users”. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this information. Respectfully submitted, BluMetric Environmental Inc.,

Alija Bos, B.Sc., P.Geo. Hydrogeologist

Iris O’Connor, B.Sc.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Engineer Page 17

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 108 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Hydrogeological Assessment Part of Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Twp. of South Frontenac 2628100 Ontario Inc.

190248 August 2019

REFERENCES

Review of the Technical Memorandum, Terrain Analysis for Plan of Subdivision, Battersea Road, Sunbury, Township of South Frontenac, Ontario. XCG, 2013. Review of the Technical Memorandum, Hydrogeological Assessment for Plan of Subdivision, Battersea Road, Sunbury, Township of South Frontenac, Ontario. XCG, 2013. Ministry of the Environment, 1995. “Procedure D-5-4 Technical Guideline for Individual On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment” (Last Revision August 1996). Ministry of the Environment, 1995. “Procedure D-5-5 Technical Guideline for Private Wells: Water supply Assessment” (Last Revision August 1996). Ministry of the Environment, 2003. Technical Support Document for Ontario Drinking Water Standards, Objectives and Guidelines (Last Revision June 2006). Ontario Geological Survey, 2011. Bedrock geology of Ontario. https://www.mndm.gov.on.ca/en/mines-and-minerals/applications/ogsearth/bedrockgeology Ontario Geological Survey, 2010. Surficial geology of Southern Ontario. https://www.mndm.gov.on.ca/en/mines-and-minerals/applications/ogsearth/surficialgeology

Page 18

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

BluMetric

Page 109 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

FIGURES

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 110 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

LEGEND

Property Boundary

1 REV.

REFERENCES

DESCRIPTION

YY/MM/DD BY CHK

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DIVULGED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. THIS DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED. ALL SCALE NOTATIONS INDICATED ARE BASED ON 11"x17" FORMAT DRAWINGS.

10 Kilometers

1:150,000 CLIENT

Campbell Land Developments PROJECT

Sunbury Hydrogeology TITLE

Site Location

PROJECT #

190248

DRAWN

N:\GIS_PROJECTS\190000\190248 - Sunbury Hydrogeology\MXD\2019-07-12\190248-Fig1-SiteLocation.mxd

DATE CHECKED

July 12, 2019 FIG NO.

REV

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 111 of 320

The Tower - The Woolen Mill, 4 Cataraqui St., Kingston, Ontario K7K 1Z7 TEL: (613) 531-2725 FAX: (613) 531-1852 Email: info@blumetric.ca Web: http://www.blumetric.ca

AGENDA ITEM #

@ A

3008 Randy Clark Rd 121.100

3000 Randy Clark Rd 121.436

@ A

MW1

121.5

TW 1 121.476

121.0

@ A

120.5

121.5

17 1.00 ha 122.0

122.0

18 1.04 ha

19 1.13 ha 121.0

TW2-EXP TW 2121.159 121.5

121.5

120.5

20 1.76 ha

122.0 122.5

123.0 123.5 124.0 124.5 125.0 125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0 127.5 128.0

121.5

122.0

@ A

122.5 123.0 124.0 123.5 124.5 125.0 125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0 127.5

TW2 128.124

122.0

122.5 123.0 123.5 124.0 124.5 125.0 125.5

@ 21 A

121.5

126.0 126.5 127.0 127.5 128.0

2.40 ha

128.5 129.0

122.0 122.5 123.0

123.5 124.0 124.5 125.0 125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0 127.5 128.0 128.5 129.0 129.5

128.5

22 1.27 ha

128.5 122.0 129.0

122.5 123.0 124.0 123.5

16 1.25 ha

122.0

122.5 124.0 123.0 123.5 124.5 125.0 125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0 128.0 127.5

125.0 125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0 127.5 128.0 128.5 129.0

130.0 130.5

129.0

129.5 129.5

130.0 130.5

15 1.25 ha 129.5

131.0

131.5

132.0

14 1.03 ha

131.5 132.0

132.5

133.0

133.5

133.0

131.0

131.5

132.0 132.5 133.0 133.5 134.0 134.5 135.0 135.5

131.0

13 0.80 ha 131.5

132.0

132.5

133.0

133.5

134.0 134.5

131.5 132.0 132.5 133.0 133.5 134.0 134.5

12 0.61 ha

135.0

135.5

134.5

130.5

130.0 130.5

131.0

134.0

132.5

130.0

129.5

129.0

130.0 130.5

131.0

23 0.62 ha

135.0

136.0

135.5

136.5

135.0

137.0

11 0.60 ha 138.5

137.5

138.0

137.0

24 0.61 ha

136.5136.0 135.5 135.0 134.5

139.0

134.0

133.5

133.0 132.5 132.0

10 TW3 139.012

25 0.61 ha 131.5

0.61 ha

.0140.0 .5 21.5 21.0 20.5 21.0 20.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 35.0 34.0 33.0 32.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 22.0 20.5 21.5 42.5 41.5 40.5 39.5 38.5 37.5 36.5 35.5 34.5 33.5 32.5 31.5 30.5 29.5 28.5 27.5 26.5 25.5 24.5 23.5 22.5 71.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 63.0 62.0 61.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 49.0 48.0 47.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 70.5 69.5 68.5 67.5 66.5 65.5 64.5 63.5 62.5 61.5 60.5 59.5 58.5 57.5 56.5 55.5 54.5 53.5 52.5 51.5 50.5 49.5 48.5 47.5 46.5 45.5 44.5 43.5 99.0 98.0 97.0 96.0 95.0 94.0 93.0 92.0 91.0 90.0 89.0 88.0 87.0 86.0 85.0 84.0 83.0 82.0 81.0 80.0 79.0 78.0 77.0 76.0 75.0 74.0 73.0 72.0 99.5 98.5 97.5 96.5 95.5 94.5 93.5 92.5 91.5 90.5 89.5 88.5 87.5 86.5 85.5 84.5 83.5 82.5 81.5 80.5 79.5 78.5 77.5 76.5 75.5 74.5 73.5 72.5 71.5 111 110.0 119.0 118.0 117.0 116.0 115.0 114.0 113.0 112.0 110.5 119.5 118.5 117.5 116.5 115.5 114.5 113.5 112.5 100.0 109.0 108.0 107.0 106.0 105.0 104.0 103.0 102.0 101.0 128.0 127.0 126.0 125.0 124.0 123.0 122.0 121.0 120.0 109.5 108.5 107.5 106.5 105.5 104.5 103.5 102.5 101.5 100.5 128.5 127.5 126.5 125.5 124.5 123.5 122.5 121.5 120.5 134.0 133.0 132.0 131.0 130.0 129.0 135.0 136.0 134.5 133.5 132.5 131.5 130.5 129.5 136.5 135.5 137.0 138.0 140.0 139.0 141.0 137.5 138.5 139.5 140.5 140.5 139.5 139.0138.5 138.0137.5 137.0 136.5 136.0 134.5 135.5 135.0 134.0

@ A

133.5 133.0 132.5 132.0

9 0.61 ha 138.0

138.5 139.0

131.0

137.5 137.0 136.5 136.0 135.5

135.0

134.5

134.0

133.5

134.0

133.0

3917 Battersea Rd TW 3 131.888

134.5

8 0.60 ha

130.5 130.0 129.5

@ A

129.0 128.5

131.0

26 0.62 ha 130.5 130.0 129.5 129.0 128.5 128.0

128.0

127.5

7 0.61 ha

TW1 127.529

127.5

3863 Battersea Rd 127.492

131.5

27 0.60 ha

127.0

NEW WELL

6 @ A 0.61 ha

@ A

127.0

126.5

126.0

126.5

28 0.61 ha

127.0

126.0 126.0

c c e A Db F ra G tc in e d (A (A re u g c e e in L a L (L c d n n c e A a 0 1 3 1 L c d ) )1 d n a 0 3 3 0 )

126.0

5 0.60 ha

126.5

126.0

126.5

29 0.62 ha 125.5

126.0

125.0

125.5 125.0 124.5 125.0 124.5

4 0.60 ha 125.0

125.5

124.0 124.5

TW 4

30 0.61 ha 124.5

TW4-EXP 126.488

@ A 3 0.61 ha 127.0

Mystery Well 126.704

124.0

124.0 124.0 124.5

31 0.68 ha 124.0

126.0 125.5

126.5

TW 5

127.5

125.0

125.5

126.0

126.5

125.0

124.0

@ A

124.0

124.5

2 0.81 ha

127.0

124.5

126.5

124.0

126.0

124.0

125.5

125.0

124.5

1 3.41 ha

126.0 125.5 125.0 124.5

@ A

124.5

TW4 126.152

124.5

3799 Battersea Rd 125.259

124.0

125.0

125.5

126.0

@ A

124.5 125.0

125.5 126.0 126.5 127.0

LEGEND

126.152

REFERENCES

Ground Surface Elevation (masl)

@ A

Monitoring Well (BLM)

@ A

Monitoring Well (EXP)

@ A

Residential Well

@ A

Other Well

Survey Benchmark

PROJECT

TITLE

1 DESCRIPTION

Campbell Land Developments

Sunbury Hydrogeology

100 Meters

Property Boundary

REV.

CLIENT

YY/MM/DD BY CHK

The Tower - The Woolen Mill, 4 Cataraqui St., Kingston, Ontario K7K 1Z7 TEL: (613) 531-2725 FAX: (613) 531-1852 Email: info@blumetric.ca Web: http://www.blumetric.ca

Site Plan

PROJECT #

190248

DRAWN

DATE CHECKED

July 12, 2019 FIG NO.

N:\GIS_PROJ ECT S\190 000 \19 024 8 - Su nbu ry Hyd rog eolo gy\M XD \201 9-0 7-1 2\1 9024 8- Fig2 -SitePlan .mxd

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 112 of 320

REV

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

LEGEND

3008 Randy Clark - YES 2994 Randy Clark - NO

2990 Randy Clark - NO

EXP-TW2

Property Outline 500 m Buffer

3000 Randy Clark - YES

Property Outline

2964 Randy Clark

A255562

A255563

3937 Battersea

3929 Battersea

3917 Battersea

A255558

3863 Battersea

1 REV.

REFERENCES

YY/MM/DD BY CHK

A191620

DESCRIPTION

200

400 Metres

1:6,800 CLIENT

Campbell Land Developments PROJECT

3811 Battersea

A255564

3344 Moreland-Dixon

N:\GIS_PROJECTS\190000\190248 - Sunbury Hydrogeology\MXD\2019-07-12\190248-Fig3-FieldFig.mxd

3799 Battersea

TITLE

Field Figure

3789 Battersea

The Tower - The Woolen Mill, 4 Cataraqui St., Kingston, Ontario K7K 1Z7 TEL: (613) 531-2725 FAX: (613) 531-1852 Email: info@blumetric.ca Web: http://www.blumetric.ca

3779 Battersea

YES 3769 Battersea
YES 3761 Battersea 3324 Moreland-Dixon

PROJECT #

190248

DRAWN

DATE CHECKED

July 12, 2019 FIG NO.

REV

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 113 of 320

3334 Moreland-Dixon

Sunbury Hydrogeology

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX A MECP Water Well Records and Permission to Monitor Letters

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 114 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

7 March 2019 Project Number: 190248

Dear Homeowner/Resident:

A hydrogeological study is being completed in your area as part of the investigations for a proposed residential development. The study is required to assess the groundwater aquifer(s) for water quantity, water quality and potential for interference with existing supply wells in the area. Test wells drilled on the subject property will be pumped to test the groundwater quality and quantity. We would like to monitor the water level in some existing nearby wells in the area during the testing. Since you are located nearby we would like to see if your well is a good candidate to include in the monitoring if you are interested in participating. For your well to qualify for this study it needs to be easily accessible (not buried underground or covered over with vegetation) and be fitted with a lid that can be easily removed without affecting the integrity of the well. Participation is voluntary and the data collected during this study will help determine the characteristics of the groundwater aquifer and any potential interference issues. With your permission, staff from BluMetric would measure the water level in your well and install a small device to monitor changes in the water level during the testing. The equipment used is sterilized and does not affect your well. The device is removed at the end of the investigation period. You may continue to use your water supply as normal during the testing period. The testing is scheduled to take place in March/April 2019. If you would like to participate please complete and return the information form at the end of the letter. If you have questions please contact the individuals listed in the letter below. BluMetric will contact you with more information regarding the timing of the study and to arrange a convenient date and time to come for an initial visit.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 115 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

If you have questions regarding the testing, please contact: Phil Tibble ptibble@blumetric.ca or Kristy Chalovich kchalovich@blumetric.ca BluMetric Environmental Inc. 613-531-2725 If you have questions regarding the proposed development, please contact: Steve McLure - smclure@live.ca Brett Campbell - cambytime1@hotmail.com

613-539-5785 613-888-1656

Regards, BluMetric Environmental Inc.

Phil Tibble, M.Sc., P.Geo. QPESA Senior Hydrogeologist

Please complete the information below and return by:   

Mail: Enclosed labelled envelope Fax: 613-531-1852 Email: ptibble@blumetric.ca

I would be interested having my well used as a monitoring well in the study: YES ____

NO ____

Name _________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________ Contact Phone Number _________________________________________ Contact Email __________________________________________________ Date __________________________________________________________ Signature ______________________________________________________

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 116 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 117 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 118 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 119 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 120 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 121 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 122 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 123 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 124 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 125 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 126 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 127 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 128 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 129 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 130 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 131 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 132 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 133 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 134 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX B Photo Sheets

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 135 of 320

Photo 2: Pumping test well rig setup at TW2 (A255562)

Photo 3: Truck set up for pumping test at TW2 (A255562)

Photo 4: Truck set up for pumping test at TW3 (A255563)

190248 - Sunbury Hydrogeological Assessment

Page 1

AGENDA ITEM #

Page…136 of 320 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury,

Photo 1: Pumping test well rig setup at TW1 (A255558)

Photo 6: Pumping test well rig setup at TW2 EXP (A100294)

Photo 8: Pumping test well rig setup at TW4 EXP (A100298) Photo 7: Set up at TW2 (A255562)

190248 - Sunbury Hydrogeological Assessment

Page 2

AGENDA ITEM #

Page…137 of 320 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury,

Photo 5: Pumping test well rig setup at TW4 (A255564)

Photo 10: Set up at TW4 EXP (A100298)

190248 - Sunbury Hydrogeological Assessment

Photo 11: TW4 EXP (A100298)

Page 3

AGENDA ITEM #

Page…138 of 320 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury,

Photo 9: Water at TW4 EXP (A100298)

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX C Pumping Test Drawdown vs. Time Plots

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 139 of 320

Pump On

A255558 - (TW1)Pumping Well

3917 Battersea Rd

3863 Battersea Rd

TW2

Pump Off

TW4-EXP

-1.0

1.0

3.0

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW1 Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

5.0

7.0

-50

100

150

200 250 Time (minutes)

300

350

400

450

500

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 140 of 320

9.0

A255562 - (TW2)Pumping Well

Pump On

TW2-EXP

TW3

Pump Off

0.0

0.1

0.2

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW2 Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

0.2

0.3

0.4

-10

140

190

240

290

340

Time (minutes)

390

440

490

540

590

640

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 141 of 320

0.4

Pump On

A255563 - (TW3)Pumping Well

3917 Battersea

TW2

Pump Off

-0.5

0.0

0.5

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW3 Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

-10

140 190

240

290

340

390 440 490 540 590 Time (minutes)

640 690

740 790

840 890

940

990

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 142 of 320

3.0

Pump On

A255564 - (TW4)Pumping Well

Pump Off

3799 Battersea

1000 1200 Time (minutes)

1400

-0.5

4.5

9.5

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW4 Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

14.5

19.5

24.5

200

400

600

800

1600

1800

2000

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 143 of 320

29.5

AA100294 - (EXP-TW2)Pumping Well

Pump On

TW3

TW2

Pump Off

0.0

0.1

0.2

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW2-EXP Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5 -10

140

190

240

290

340

Time (minutes)

390

440

490

540

590

640

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 144 of 320

0.4

A100298 - (TW4-EXP)Pumping Well

Pump On

TW4

3799 Battersea

Pump Off

-5.0

0.0

5.0

Drawdown (m)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

TW4-EXP Pumping Test - Reduced Scale

10.0

15.0

25.0 -10

140

190

240

290 340 Time (minutes)

390

440

490

540

590

640

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 145 of 320

20.0

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX D Aquifer Test – Transmissivity Results

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 146 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW2-EXP Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW2-EXP

Analysis Performed by: AB

New analysis 1

Analysis Date: 2019-06-28

Aquifer Thickness: 21.50 m

Discharge Rate: 5.08 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-05-27

t/t’ [min] 1E2 1E-1

1E3

[m]

1E-2

1E-3

1E-4 TW2-EXP Calculation using AGARWAL + Theis Observation Well

TW2-EXP

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

1.16 × 10

-3

5.38 × 10

Storage coefficient

Ratio K(v)/K(h)

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-5

1.00 × 10

-4

1.00 × 10

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

-1

1.00 × 10

0.16

Page 147 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW1 - Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW1

Analysis Performed by: AB

TW1

Analysis Date: 2019-06-28

Aquifer Thickness: 31.68 m

Discharge Rate: 5.02 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-06-04

t/t’ [min] 1E-1 1E1

1E0

1E1

1E2

1E3

[m]

8E0

6E0

4E0

2E0

0E0 TW1 Calculation using Theis Observation Well

TW1

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

1.05 × 10

-5

3.33 × 10

Storage coefficient

Ratio K(v)/K(h)

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-7

6.15 × 10

-2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

1.52 × 10

-1

0.16

Page 148 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW1 - Pumping Test

Test Conducted by: B.M. Aquifer Thickness: 31.68 m

Pumping Well: TW1 Test Date: 2019-06-04

Discharge Rate: 5.02 [U.S. gal/min]

Analysis Name

Analysis Performed byAnalysis Date

Method name

Well

T [m²/s]

TW1

Theis

TW1

1.05 × 10

2019-06-28

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

K [m/s] -5

3.33 × 10

S -7

Page 149 of 320

6.15 × 10

-2

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW3 - Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW3

Analysis Performed by: A.B.

TW3

Analysis Date: 2019-07-11

Aquifer Thickness: 32.70 m

Discharge Rate: 5.1 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-06-01

Time [min] 1E-3 3E0

1E-2

1E-1

1E0

1E1

Drawdown [m]

2E0

1E0

6E-1

0E0 TW3 Calculation using Theis Observation Well

TW3

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

5.86 × 10

-5

1.79 × 10

Storage coefficient

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-6

2.64 × 10

-3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

0.16

Page 150 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW2 - Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW2

Analysis Performed by: AB

TW2

Analysis Date: 2019-07-11

Aquifer Thickness: 14.33 m

Discharge Rate: 5.73781697721898 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-06-06

Time [min] 1E-1 0.30

1E0

1E1

1E2

1E3

Drawdown [m]

0.24

0.18

0.12

0.06

0.00 TW2 Calculation using Theis Observation Well

TW2

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

1.29 × 10

-3

9.02 × 10

Storage coefficient

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-5

9.90 × 10

-1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

0.16

Page 151 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW4 - Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW4

Analysis Performed by: AB

New analysis 1

Analysis Date: 2019-07-11

Aquifer Thickness: 40.11 m

Discharge Rate: 3.02 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-05-29

Time [min] 1E-1 30.00

1E0

1E1

1E2

Drawdown [m]

24.00

18.00

12.00

6.00

0.00 TW4 Calculation using Theis Observation Well

TW4

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

1.35 × 10

-6

3.36 × 10

Storage coefficient

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-8

6.59 × 10

-2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

0.16

Page 152 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Pumping Test Analysis Report

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeo Number: 190248 Client: Location: Sunbury

Brett Campbell

Pumping Test: TW4-EXP Pumping Test

Pumping Well: TW4-EXP

Analysis Performed by: AB

TW4-EXP

Analysis Date: 2019-07-12

Aquifer Thickness: 33.43 m

Discharge Rate: 4 [U.S. gal/min]

Test Conducted by: B.M.

Test Date: 2019-07-12

Time [min] 1E-1 20.00

1E0

1E1

1E2

1E3

Drawdown [m]

16.00

12.00

8.00

4.00

0.00 TW4-EXP Calculation using Theis Observation Well

TW4-EXP

Transmissivity

Hydraulic Conductivity

[m²/s]

[m/s]

3.76 × 10

-6

1.12 × 10

Storage coefficient

Radial Distance to PW [m]

-7

4.67 × 10

-2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

0.16

Page 153 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX E Analytical Reports

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 154 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 4 Cataraqui Street Kingston, ON K7K1Z7 (613) 531-2725 ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos PROJECT: 190248 AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425 MICROBIOLOGY ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Rocio Morales, Inorganics Lab Supervisor WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Nivine Basily, Inorganics Report Writer DATE REPORTED: Jun 06, 2019 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 9 VERSION*: 2

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

*NOTES VERSION 2: V2 issued 2019-06-06. Complete report. Supersedes previous version.

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time. Laboratories (V2)

Page 1 of 9 AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation. Measurement Uncertainty is not taken into consideration when stating conformity with a specified requirement. Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received. All reportable information as specified by ISO 17025:2017 is available from AGAT Laboratories upon request

Member of: Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA) Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 155 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Microbiological Analysis (water) DATE RECEIVED: 2019-05-28

Parameter Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

DATE REPORTED: 2019-05-31

Unit

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: TW2 EXP-6hour SAMPLE TYPE: Water 2019-05-27 DATE SAMPLED: G/S RDL 227621

CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/1mL

1 1 1 10

ND ND ND ND

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard 227621 ND - Not Detected. Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 2 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 156 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-05-28

Parameter

Unit µS/cm pH Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L TCU NTU mg phenol/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L %

G / S: A

6.5-8.5 80-100 500 30-500 1.5 250 10.0 1.0 500

5 5

200 0.3 0.05

2 NA 0.5 20 5 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.02 0.10 0.5 0.001 0.05 5 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.010 0.002 NA

716 7.87 368 468[<B] 353 <0.25[<A] 27.2[<B] 1.19[<A] <0.25[<A] 36.1[<B] <0.02 <0.10 4.1[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] 1.0[<B] <0.1 94.7 31.9 19.1[<A] 2.33 <0.010[<B] 0.010[<B] 2.51

745 7.77 364 460[<B] 356 <0.25[<A] 27.2[<B] 1.40[<A] <0.25[<A] 36.5[<B] <0.02 <0.10 5.2[>B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] <0.5[<B] 0.1 94.0 31.3 17.9[<A] 2.19 <0.010[<B] 0.009[<B] 3.84

Certified By: CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 3 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 157 of 320

Electrical Conductivity pH Total Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-06 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: TW2 EXP-3hour TW2 EXP-6hour SAMPLE TYPE: Water Water 2019-05-27 2019-05-27 DATE SAMPLED: G / S: B RDL 227620 227621

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-05-28 Comments: 227620-227621

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-06

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: A Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards. Na value is derived from O. Reg. 248, B Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards - Aesthetic Objectives and Operational Guidelines Guideline values are for general reference only. The guidelines provided may or may not be relevant for the intended use. Refer directly to the applicable standard for regulatory interpretation. Elevated RDL indicates the degree of sample dilution prior to the analysis in order to keep analytes within the calibration range of the instrument and to reduce matrix interference. Total Hardness (as CaCO3) and % Difference/Ion balance are calculated parameters.

Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 4 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 158 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Guideline Violation

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLEID

SAMPLE TITLE

227620

TW2 EXP-3hour

227621

TW2 EXP-6hour

227621

TW2 EXP-6hour

GUIDELINE O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

UNIT GUIDEVALUE

ANALYSIS PACKAGE

PARAMETER

RESULT

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

368

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Dissolved Organic Carbon

mg/L

5.2

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

364

Page 5 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 159 of 320 GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V2)

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

SAMPLED BY:BM

Microbiology Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER Microbiological Analysis (water) Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Batch

227621 227621 227621 228370

Sample Id

227621 227621 227621

Dup #1

ND ND ND ND

Dup #2

ND ND ND ND

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

NA NA NA NA

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Recovery

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

<1 <1 <1 < 10

Comments: ND - Not Detected, NA - % RPD Not Applicable

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 6 of 9

AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation. RPDs calculated using raw data. The RPD may not be reflective of duplicate values shown, due to rounding of final results.

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 160 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

SAMPLED BY:BM

Water Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER

Batch

Subdiv. Well Water Supply Electrical Conductivity pH Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride

229038 229038 227620 229038 226248

Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N

226248 226248 226248 226248 227621

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Sulphide Hydrogen Sulphide

227620 231504 218148 231483 231483

Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium

226248 225287 228957 227620 227620

Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese

227620 227620 227620 227620

Sample Id

Dup #1

Dup #2

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits

Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

741 7.96 468 349 <0.25

733 7.80 464 351 <0.25

1.1% 2.0% 0.9% 0.4% NA

<2 NA < 20 <5 < 0.05

96% 100% 100% 97% 96%

80% 90% 80% 80% 90%

120% 110% 120% 120% 110%

102%

90% 110%

103%

80% 120%

134 <0.25 <0.25 67.3 <0.02

137 <0.25 <0.25 69.1 <0.02

1.8% NA NA 2.7% NA

< 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 0.02

92% 93% NA 92% 109%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

101% 99% 104% 98% 96%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

103% 101% 103% 100% 83%

80% 80% 80% 80% 80%

120% 120% 120% 120% 120%

<0.10 3.8 0.001 <0.05 <0.05

<0.10 3.9 0.001 <0.05 <0.05

NA 2.1% NA NA NA

< 0.10 < 0.5 < 0.001 < 0.05 < 0.05

98% NA 100% 98% 98%

80% 90% 90% 80% 90%

120% 110% 110% 120% 110%

102% 109% 103% 99% 99%

80% 90% 90% 85% 90%

120% 110% 110% 115% 110%

106% 98% 99% 96% 96%

70% 80% 80% 70% 80%

130% 120% 120% 130% 120%

227620 227620

29 13.6 3.2 94.7 31.9

31 15.0 3.4 94.0 31.4

5.3% 9.8% 3.3% 0.8% 1.3%

<5 < 0.5 < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05

107% 99% 100% 94% 92%

90% 90% 80% 90% 90%

110% 110% 120% 110% 110%

97% 96% 93%

85% 115% 90% 110% 90% 110%

82% 95% 95%

70% 130% 70% 130% 70% 130%

227620 227620 227620 227620

19.1 2.33 <0.010 0.010

18.8 2.27 0.011 0.010

1.4% 2.3% NA NA

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.010 < 0.002

93% 93% 109% 108%

90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110%

93% 94% 104% 107%

90% 90% 90% 90%

93% 95% 113% 110%

70% 70% 70% 70%

227620

227621 227620

110% 110% 110% 110%

130% 130% 130% 130%

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable. Duplicate Qualifier: As the measured result approaches the RL, the uncertainty associated with the value increases dramatically, thus duplicate acceptance limits apply only where the average of the two duplicates is greater than five times the RL.

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 7 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 161 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Method Summary AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P472425

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury

SAMPLED BY:BM

PARAMETER Microbiology Analysis Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count Water Analysis Electrical Conductivity pH Total Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate

AGAT S.O.P

LITERATURE REFERENCE

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE

MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7000 MIC-93-7020

EPA 1604 EPA 1604 SM 9222 D SM 9215C

Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration INCUBATOR

INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6000 MET-93-6105 INOR-93-6028 INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004

SM 2510 B SM 4500-H+ B EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 SM 2540 C SM 2320 B SM 4110 B SM 4110 B SM 4110 B SM 4110 B SM 4110 B QuikChem 10-107-06-1-J & SM 4500 NH3-F QuikChem 10-107-06-2-I & SM 4500-Norg D EPA 415.1 & SM 5310 B MOE ROPHEN-E 3179 & SM 5530 D SM 4500 S2- D SM 2120 C SM 2130 B SM 550B, 21st Edition EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 SM 1030 E

PC TITRATE PC TITRATE CALCULATION BALANCE PC TITRATE ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Ammonia as N

INOR-93-6059

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

INOR-93-6048

Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

INOR-93-6049 INOR-93-6050 INOR-93-6054 INOR-93-6046 INOR-93-6044 INOR-93-6058 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6103 MET-93-6103

LACHAT FIA LACHAT FIA SHIMADZU CARBON ANALYZER TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER SPECTROPHOTOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER NEPHELOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP-MS ICP-MS CALCULATION

METHOD SUMMARY (V2)

Page 8 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 162 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 163 of 320

Page 9 of 9

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 164 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 165 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 166 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 167 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 168 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 4 Cataraqui Street Kingston, ON K7K1Z7 (613) 531-2725 ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos PROJECT: 190248 AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135 MICROBIOLOGY ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Rocio Morales, Inorganics Lab Supervisor WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Parvathi Malemath, Data Reviewer DATE REPORTED: Jun 13, 2019 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 9 VERSION*: 1

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

*NOTES

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time. Laboratories (V1)

Member of: Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA) Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 169 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Microbiological Analysis (water) DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-07

RDL

TW4 EXP 7.5hour Water 2019-06-03 16:30 243734

1 1 1 10

ND ND ND ND

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED: Parameter Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Unit CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/1mL

G/S

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard 243734 ND - Not Detected. Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)

Page 2 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 170 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-10 TW4 EXP 7.5hour Water 2019-06-03 16:30 243734

2 NA 0.5 20 5 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.02 0.10 0.5 0.001 0.05 5 0.5 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.010 0.002 NA

921 7.92 403 512[>B] 286 0.49[<A] 114[<B] <0.25[<A] <0.25[<A] 32.9[<B] <0.02 0.18 1.0[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] 11.2[>B] <0.1 103 35.4 19.8[<A] 5.16 1.06[>B] 0.043[<B] 3.22

902 7.78 383 490[<B] 282 0.47[<A] 108[<B] <0.25[<A] <0.25[<A] 32.6[<B] <0.02 0.15 1.0[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] 3.8[<B] <0.1 97.3 34.0 15.7[<A] 5.00 0.314[>B] 0.027[<B] 5.19

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED: Parameter Electrical Conductivity pH Total Hardness (as CaCO3) Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

Unit µS/cm pH Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L TCU NTU mg phenol/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L %

G / S: A

G / S: B 6.5-8.5 80-100 500 30-500

1.5 250 10.0 1.0 500

5 5

200 0.3 0.05

Certified By: CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)

Page 3 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 171 of 320

RDL

TW4 EXP 3hour Water 2019-06-03 12:00 243726

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04 Comments: 243726-243734

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-10

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: A Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards. Na value is derived from O. Reg. 248, B Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards - Aesthetic Objectives and Operational Guidelines Guideline values are for general reference only. The guidelines provided may or may not be relevant for the intended use. Refer directly to the applicable standard for regulatory interpretation. Elevated RDLs indicate the degree of sample dilutions prior to analyses to keep analytes within the calibration range, reduce matrix interference and to avoid contaminating the instruments. Please note that Total Hardness (as CaCO3) & % Difference/Ion Balance are calculated parameters.

Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)

Page 4 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 172 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Guideline Violation

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLEID

SAMPLE TITLE

243726

TW4 EXP - 3hour

243726

TW4 EXP - 3hour

243726

TW4 EXP - 3hour

243726

TW4 EXP - 3hour

243734

TW4 EXP - 7.5hour

243734

TW4 EXP - 7.5hour

GUIDELINE O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

UNIT GUIDEVALUE

ANALYSIS PACKAGE

PARAMETER

RESULT

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Iron

mg/L

0.3

1.06

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Dissolved Solids

mg/L

500

512

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

403

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Turbidity

NTU

11.2

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Iron

mg/L

0.3

0.314

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

383

Page 5 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 173 of 320 GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1)

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Microbiology Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER Microbiological Analysis (water) Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Batch

246105 246105 243734 243734

Sample Id

243734 243734

Dup #1

ND 84 ND ND

Dup #2

ND 79 ND ND

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

NA 6.1% NA NA

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Recovery

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

<1 <1 <1 < 10

Comments: ND - Not Detected, NA - % RPD Not Applicable

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1)

Page 6 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 174 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Water Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER

Batch

Sample Id

Dup #1

Dup #2

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits

Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Subdiv. Well Water Supply Electrical Conductivity pH Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride

250717 250717 237292 250717 251949

506 7.99 1660 248 <0.05

504 7.88 1730 249 <0.05

0.4% 1.4% 4.1% 0.4% NA

<2 NA < 20 <5 < 0.05

95% 100% 96% 111% 100%

80% 90% 80% 80% 90%

120% 110% 120% 120% 110%

104%

90% 110%

106%

80% 120%

Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N

251949 251949 251949 251949 237292

13.8 0.72 <0.05 12.5 <0.02

0.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA

< 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 0.02

93% 90% NA 95% 100%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

103% 102% 107% 101% 91%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

104% 101% 108% 99% 101%

80% 80% 80% 80% 80%

120% 120% 120% 120% 120%

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Sulphide Hydrogen Sulphide

244897 240037 255829 255829 255829

0.43 2.9 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

0.51 2.9 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

NA 0.0% NA NA NA

< 0.10 < 0.5 < 0.001 < 0.05 < 0.05

103% NA 98% 96% 96%

80% 90% 90% 80% 90%

120% 110% 110% 120% 110%

106% 92% 103% 96% 96%

80% 90% 90% 85% 90%

120% 110% 110% 115% 110%

98% 85% 103% 95% 95%

70% 80% 80% 70% 80%

130% 120% 120% 130% 120%

Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium

255829 245300 238235 245300 245300

<5 8.3 <0.1 43.3 11.3

<5 8.3 <0.1 39.7 10.7

NA 0.0% NA 8.7% 5.5%

<5 < 0.5 < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05

107% 100% 100% 94% 94%

90% 90% 80% 90% 90%

110% 110% 120% 110% 110%

103% 96% 96%

85% 115% 90% 110% 90% 110%

93% 93% 94%

70% 130% 70% 130% 70% 130%

Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese

245300 245300 240365 240365

98.5 5.46 4.43 0.666

90.5 5.15 4.44 0.666

8.5% 5.8% 0.2% 0.0%

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.010 < 0.002

95% 98% 104% 104%

90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110%

96% 100% 102% 107%

90% 90% 90% 90%

93% 97% 125% 96%

70% 70% 70% 70%

110% 110% 110% 110%

130% 130% 130% 130%

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable. Duplicate Qualifier: For duplicates as the measured result approaches the Reporting Limit (RL), the uncertainty associated with the value increases dramatically, thus duplicate acceptance limits apply only where the average of the two duplicates is greater than five times the RL.

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1)

Page 7 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 175 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Method Summary AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475135

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

AGAT S.O.P

LITERATURE REFERENCE

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE

MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7000 MIC-93-7020

EPA 1604 EPA 1604 SM 9222 D SM 9215C

Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration INCUBATOR

INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6000 MET-93-6105 INOR-93-6028 INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004

PC TITRATE PC TITRATE CALCULATION BALANCE PC TITRATE ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Ammonia as N

INOR-93-6059

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

INOR-93-6048

Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

INOR-93-6049 INOR-93-6050 INOR-93-6054 INOR-93-6046 INOR-93-6044 INOR-93-6058 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6103 MET-93-6103

LACHAT FIA LACHAT FIA SHIMADZU CARBON ANALYZER TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER SPECTROPHOTOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER NEPHELOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP-MS ICP-MS CALCULATION

METHOD SUMMARY (V1)

Page 8 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 176 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 177 of 320

Page 9 of 9

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 4 Cataraqui Street Kingston, ON K7K1Z7 (613) 531-2725 ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos PROJECT: 190248 AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294 MICROBIOLOGY ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Rocio Morales, Inorganics Lab Supervisor WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Parvathi Malemath, Data Reviewer DATE REPORTED: Jun 13, 2019 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 9 VERSION*: 2

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

*NOTES VERSION 2: V1 issued 2019-06-11. Partial report with Microbiological data only. V2 issued 2019-06-13. Complete report. Supersedes previous version.

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time. Laboratories (V2)

Member of: Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA) Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 178 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Microbiological Analysis (water) DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-07 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED:

Parameter Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Unit CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/1mL

G/S

RDL

TW1 - 3hour Water 2019-06-04 10:00 245300

TW1 - 6hour Water 2019-06-04 13:00 245395

1 1 1 10

ND ND ND ND

Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard 245300-245395 ND - Not Detected. Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 2 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 179 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-10 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED:

Parameter

Unit µS/cm pH Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L TCU NTU mg phenol/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L %

G / S: A

G / S: B 6.5-8.5 80-100 500 30-500

1.5 250 10.0 1.0 500

5 5

200 0.3 0.05

RDL

TW1 - 6hour Water 2019-06-04 13:00 245395

2 NA 0.5 20 5 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.02 0.10 0.5 0.001 0.05 5 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.010 0.002 NA

687 7.81 155 356[<B] 308 1.29[<A] 27.9[<B] <0.10[<A] <0.10[<A] 23.4[<B] 0.16 0.34 0.5[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] 8.3[>B] <0.1 43.3 11.3 98.5[A-B] 5.46 0.546[>B] 0.015[<B] 0.153

651 7.79 181 342[<B] 294 0.95[<A] 25.3[<B] <0.10[<A] <0.10[<A] 20.3[<B] 0.13 0.24 0.8[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5[<B] 2.7[<B] <0.1 50.8 13.1 69.7[A-B] 4.51 0.233[<B] 0.013[<B] 2.15

Certified By: CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 3 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 180 of 320

TW1 - 3hour Water 2019-06-04 10:00 245300

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-04 Comments: 245300-245395

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-10

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: A Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards. Na value is derived from O. Reg. 248, B Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards - Aesthetic Objectives and Operational Guidelines Guideline values are for general reference only. The guidelines provided may or may not be relevant for the intended use. Refer directly to the applicable standard for regulatory interpretation. Elevated RDLs indicate the degree of sample dilutions prior to analyses to keep analytes within the calibration range, reduce matrix interference and to avoid contaminating the instruments. Please note that Total Hardness (as CaCO3), Hydrogen Sulphide & % Difference/Ion Balance are calculated parameters.

Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 4 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 181 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Guideline Violation

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLEID

SAMPLE TITLE

245300

TW1 - 3hour

245300

TW1 - 3hour

245300

TW1 - 3hour

245300

TW1 - 3hour

245395

TW1 - 6hour

245395

TW1 - 6hour

GUIDELINE O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg.169/03(mg/L) O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg.169/03(mg/L)

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

UNIT GUIDEVALUE

ANALYSIS PACKAGE

PARAMETER

RESULT

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Iron

mg/L

0.3

0.546

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

155

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Turbidity

NTU

8.3

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Sodium

mg/L

98.5

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

181

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Sodium

mg/L

69.7

Page 5 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 182 of 320 GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V2)

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Microbiology Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER Microbiological Analysis (water) Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Batch

Sample Id

246105 246105 243734 243734

Dup #1

ND 84 ND ND

Dup #2

ND 79 ND ND

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

NA 6.1% NA NA

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Recovery

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

<1 <1 <1 < 10

Comments: ND - Not Detected, NA - % RPD Not Applicable

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 6 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 183 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Water Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER

Batch

Sample Id

Dup #1

Dup #2

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

Subdiv. Well Water Supply Electrical Conductivity pH Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride

250717 250717 247432 250717 248968

506 7.99 398 248 <0.25

504 7.88 386 249 <0.25

0.4% 1.4% 3.1% 0.4% NA

Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N

248968 248968 248968 248968 245300

143 <0.25 <0.25 82.5 0.16

139 <0.25 <0.25 79.6 0.15

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Sulphide Hydrogen Sulphide

244897 240037 255829 255829 255829

0.43 2.9 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium

255829 245300 238235 245300 245300

Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese

245300 245300 240365 240365

245300

245300 245300 245300 245300 245300

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits

Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

< 20 <5 < 0.05

95% 100% 96% 111% 98%

80% 90% 80% 80% 90%

120% 110% 120% 120% 110%

104%

90% 110%

103%

80% 120%

2.8% NA NA 3.6% 6.5%

< 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 0.02

93% 94% NA 95% 95%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

103% 102% 107% 101% 97%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

100% 102% 97% 99% 112%

80% 80% 80% 80% 80%

120% 120% 120% 120% 120%

0.51 2.9 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

NA 0.0% NA NA NA

< 0.10 < 0.5 < 0.001 < 0.05 < 0.05

103% NA 98% 96% 96%

80% 90% 90% 80% 90%

120% 110% 110% 120% 110%

106% 92% 103% 96% 96%

80% 90% 90% 85% 90%

120% 110% 110% 115% 110%

98% 85% 103% 95% 95%

70% 80% 80% 70% 80%

130% 120% 120% 130% 120%

<5 8.3 <0.1 43.3 11.3

<5 8.3 <0.1 39.7 10.7

NA 0.0% NA 8.7% 5.5%

<5 < 0.5 < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05

107% 100% 100% 94% 94%

90% 90% 80% 90% 90%

110% 110% 120% 110% 110%

103% 96% 96%

85% 115% 90% 110% 90% 110%

93% 93% 94%

70% 130% 70% 130% 70% 130%

98.5 5.46 4.43 0.666

90.5 5.15 4.44 0.666

8.5% 5.8% 0.2% 0.0%

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.010 < 0.002

95% 98% 104% 104%

90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110%

96% 100% 102% 107%

90% 90% 90% 90%

93% 97% 125% 96%

70% 70% 70% 70%

110% 110% 110% 110%

130% 130% 130% 130%

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 7 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 184 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Method Summary AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P475294

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

AGAT S.O.P

LITERATURE REFERENCE

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE

MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7000 MIC-93-7020

EPA 1604 EPA 1604 SM 9222 D SM 9215C

Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration INCUBATOR

INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6000 MET-93-6105 INOR-93-6028 INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004

PC TITRATE PC TITRATE CALCULATION BALANCE PC TITRATE ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Ammonia as N

INOR-93-6059

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

INOR-93-6048

Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

INOR-93-6049 INOR-93-6050 INOR-93-6054 INOR-93-6046 INOR-93-6044 INOR-93-6058 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6103 MET-93-6103

LACHAT FIA LACHAT FIA SHIMADZU CARBON ANALYZER TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER SPECTROPHOTOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER NEPHELOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP-MS ICP-MS CALCULATION

METHOD SUMMARY (V2)

Page 8 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 185 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 186 of 320

Page 9 of 9

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 4 Cataraqui Street Kingston, ON K7K1Z7 (613) 531-2725 ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos PROJECT: 190248 AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557 MICROBIOLOGY ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Rocio Morales, Inorganics Lab Supervisor WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Nivine Basily, Inorganics Report Writer DATE REPORTED: Jun 17, 2019 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 9 VERSION*: 2

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

*NOTES VERSION 2: V2 issued 2019-06-17. Complete report. Supersedes previous version.

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time. Laboratories (V2)

Member of: Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA) Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 187 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Microbiological Analysis (water) DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-06

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-09 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED:

Parameter Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Unit

G/S

RDL

TW2-3hour Water 2019-06-06 10:00 251870

CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/100mL CFU/1mL

0 0

1 1 1 10

ND ND ND ND

TW2-6hour Water 2019-06-06 13:00 251888 ND 1 ND ND

Comments:

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards. Na value is derived from O. Reg. 248 Guideline values are for general reference only. The guidelines provided may or may not be relevant for the intended use. Refer directly to the applicable standard for regulatory interpretation. 251870-251888 ND - Not Detected. Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 2 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 188 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-06

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-13 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: SAMPLE TYPE: DATE SAMPLED:

Parameter

Unit µS/cm pH Units mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L TCU NTU mg phenol/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L %

G / S: A

G / S: B 6.5-8.5 80-100 500 30-500

1.5 250 10.0 1.0 500

5 5

200 0.3 0.05

RDL

TW2-6hour Water 2019-06-06 13:00 251888

2 NA 0.5 20 5 0.05 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.5 0.001 0.05 5 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.010 0.002 NA

564 7.52 288 280[<B] 288 <0.05 4.92[<B] 1.25[<A] <0.05 14.4[<B] <0.02 0.41 0.8[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5 <0.5 0.1 87.6 16.7 3.49[<A] 0.86 <0.010 <0.002 2.99

565 7.80 287 284[<B] 289 <0.05 5.04[<B] 1.28[<A] <0.05 14.6[<B] <0.02 0.36 0.9[<B] <0.001 <0.05 <5 <0.5 0.2 87.2 16.7 3.54[<A] 0.88 <0.010 <0.002 3.37

Certified By: CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 3 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 189 of 320

TW2-3hour Water 2019-06-06 10:00 251870

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos SAMPLED BY:BM

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Subdiv. Well Water Supply DATE RECEIVED: 2019-06-06

DATE REPORTED: 2019-06-13

Comments:

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: A Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards. Na value is derived from O. Reg. 248, B Refers to Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards - Aesthetic Objectives and Operational Guidelines Guideline values are for general reference only. The guidelines provided may or may not be relevant for the intended use. Refer directly to the applicable standard for regulatory interpretation. 251870-251888 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) and % Difference/Ion balance are calculated parameters. Analysis performed at AGAT Toronto (unless marked by *)

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)

Page 4 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 190 of 320

Certified By:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Guideline Violation

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557 PROJECT: 190248 CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. SAMPLEID

SAMPLE TITLE

251870

TW2-3hour

251888

TW2-6hour

251888

TW2-6hour

GUIDELINE O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg. 169(mg/L)AO&OG O.Reg.169/03(mg/L)

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos ANALYSIS PACKAGE

PARAMETER

Subdiv. Well Water Supply

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

Subdiv. Well Water Supply Microbiological Analysis (water)

UNIT GUIDEVALUE

RESULT

mg/L

80-100

288

Total Hardness (as CaCO3)

mg/L

80-100

287

Total Coliforms

CFU/100mL

Page 5 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 191 of 320 GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V2)

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Microbiology Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER Microbiological Analysis (water) Escherichia coli Total Coliforms Fecal Coliform Heterotrophic Plate Count

Batch

251870 251870 251870 251870

Sample Id

251870 251870 251870 251870

Dup #1

ND ND ND ND

Dup #2

ND ND ND ND

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

NA NA NA NA

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Recovery

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

<1 <1 <1 < 10

Comments: ND - Not Detected, NA - % RPD Not Applicable

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 6 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 192 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Quality Assurance AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

Water Analysis RPT Date:

DUPLICATE

PARAMETER

Batch

Sample Id

Dup #1

Dup #2

REFERENCE MATERIAL METHOD BLANK SPIKE RPD

Method Blank

Measured Value

Acceptable Limits

Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits

MATRIX SPIKE Recovery

Lower Upper

Acceptable Limits Lower Upper

Subdiv. Well Water Supply Electrical Conductivity pH Total Dissolved Solids Alkalinity (as CaCO3) Fluoride

251136 251136 255193 251136 258358

369 8.00 170 143 <0.05

370 7.94 172 144 <0.05

0.3% 0.8% 1.2% 0.7% NA

<2 NA < 20 <5 < 0.05

105% 101% 86% 99% 97%

80% 90% 80% 80% 90%

120% 110% 120% 120% 110%

105%

90% 110%

95%

80% 120%

Chloride Nitrate as N Nitrite as N Sulphate Ammonia as N

258358 258358 258358 258358 251811

31.3 0.62 <0.05 19.3 0.03

31.9 0.62 <0.05 19.3 0.04

1.9% 0.0% NA 0.0% NA

< 0.10 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 0.02

90% 95% NA 94% 95%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

103% 104% 105% 101% 102%

90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110% 110%

96% 103% 104% 97% 103%

80% 80% 80% 80% 80%

120% 120% 120% 120% 120%

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Sulphide Hydrogen Sulphide

255694 252105 252115 263333 263333

0.60 154 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

0.61 159 <0.001 <0.05 <0.05

1.7% 3.2% NA NA NA

< 0.10 < 0.5 < 0.001 < 0.05 < 0.05

104% 96% 102% 99% 99%

80% 90% 90% 80% 90%

120% 110% 110% 120% 110%

105% 105% 98% 98% 98%

80% 90% 90% 85% 90%

120% 110% 110% 115% 110%

95% 98% 102% 97% 97%

70% 80% 80% 70% 80%

130% 120% 120% 130% 120%

Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium

250717 250658 255829 251888 251888

19 <0.5 <0.1 87.2 16.7

20 <0.5 <0.1 87.3 16.8

NA NA NA 0.1% 0.6%

<5 < 0.5 < 0.1 < 0.05 < 0.05

107% 100% 106% 95% 90%

90% 90% 80% 90% 90%

110% 110% 120% 110% 110%

93% 99% 94%

85% 115% 90% 110% 90% 110%

97% 101% 97%

70% 130% 70% 130% 70% 130%

Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese

251888 251888 256327 256327

3.54 0.88 <0.010 <0.002

3.56 0.87 <0.010 <0.002

0.6% 1.1% NA NA

< 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.010 < 0.002

95% 96% 95% 105%

90% 90% 90% 90%

110% 110% 110% 110%

98% 100% 102% 107%

90% 90% 90% 90%

99% 101% 102% 100%

70% 70% 70% 70%

251888 251888 251888 251888

110% 110% 110% 110%

130% 130% 130% 130%

Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2)

Page 7 of 9

Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 193 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

5835 COOPERS AVENUE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1Y2 TEL (905)712-5100 FAX (905)712-5122 http://www.agatlabs.com

Method Summary AGAT WORK ORDER: 19P476557

CLIENT NAME: BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC. PROJECT: 190248

ATTENTION TO: Alija Bos

SAMPLING SITE:Sunbury Hydro G

SAMPLED BY:BM

AGAT S.O.P

LITERATURE REFERENCE

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE

MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7010 MIC-93-7000 MIC-93-7020

EPA 1604 EPA 1604 SM 9222 D SM 9215C

Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration Membrane Filtration INCUBATOR

INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6000 MET-93-6105 INOR-93-6028 INOR-93-6000 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004 INOR-93-6004

PC TITRATE PC TITRATE CALCULATION BALANCE PC TITRATE ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Ammonia as N

INOR-93-6059

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

INOR-93-6048

Dissolved Organic Carbon Phenols Hydrogen Sulphide Colour Turbidity Tannins and Lignins Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium Iron Manganese % Difference/ Ion Balance

INOR-93-6049 INOR-93-6050 INOR-93-6054 INOR-93-6046 INOR-93-6044 INOR-93-6058 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6105 MET-93-6103 MET-93-6103

LACHAT FIA LACHAT FIA SHIMADZU CARBON ANALYZER TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER SPECTROPHOTOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER NEPHELOMETER SPECTROPHOTOMETER ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP/OES ICP-MS ICP-MS CALCULATION

METHOD SUMMARY (V2)

Page 8 of 9 Results relate only to the items tested. Results apply to samples as received.

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 194 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 195 of 320

Page 9 of 9

AGENDA ITEM #

APPENDIX F Sodium Level Advisory to KFL&A Health Unit

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 196 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

12 July 2019 Project Number: 190248

Dr. Kieran Moore Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington Public Health 221 Portsmouth Avenue Kingston, ON K7M 1V5

Groundwater Quality Hydrogeological Assessment at Proposed Development Part of Lots 25 to 30, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac

Re:

Dear Dr. Moore:

Water quality testing was completed in support of potential development on the property. We understand the proposed development consists of potentially thirty-one (31) lots (31 SFD units) on approximately 31.6 hectares (78 acres). The residential lots will be serviced by private water wells and septic systems and will be located on Development Part Lots 25/26 Concession 2, Township of South Frontenac. MECP Procedure D-5-5 Technical Guideline for Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment, 1996 indicates that the local Medical Officer of Health should be contacted when the concentration of sodium exceeds 20 mg/L. This letter is to inform you that measured sodium concentrations exceeding 20 mg/L were obtained for raw well water samples collected at the site. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (613) 531-2725 should you have any questions. Regards, BluMetric Environmental Inc.

DRAFT Alija Bos, B.Sc., P.Geo, QPESA. Hydrogeologist

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 197 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 198 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

XCG CONSULTANTS

LTD.

T 613 542 5888 F613 S420-M4 | kHI(].\l()l"X( UHIIII

Environmsnia/Engineers & Sclsnrlsrs

r; (}IIzIm(|\II Srwm, woolen Ml” VVI-SI Wmq Sum I06, KIII(;5ImI, ()nIann,

( aII.1claKIK I7/

XCG File N0.: 1-2799-01-01 January 18, 2013

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TERRAIN ANALYSISFOR PLANOF SUBDIVISION SUNBURY, TOWNSHIPOF SOUTHFRONTENAC, ONTARIO

Prepared for:

BRETTCAMPBELL 77 Byron Crescent Kingston, ON K7M 1J1

gym

I/1///(‘T/(

Janet Noyes, P.Eng.. Project Manager

TMl27990l01_130l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 199 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum,

Township

///xca

of South Frontenac

TABLEOF CONTENTS

………………………………………………… .. …….. …………..

INTRODUCTION

PRIVATESEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS Field Investigations 2.1

..2 ..2 ……2

Test Pit Investigation… 2.1.2 Sail Grain Size Analysi 2.1.3 Percolation Testing ………. Assessment of Feasibility of Class 4 Disposal Systems. Calculation of Wastewater F low 2.2.1 2.2.2 Disposal Bed Sizing ………………… .. 2.2.3 Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment 2.1.1

2.2

…2 4

..4 ‘..4 …5 7

………………………………………. ………………………………………. ……………………………………….. …………………………………………. …… ………………

CONCLUSIONS

FIGURE Figure 1 Figure 2

Site Plan and Test Pit Locations Raised Filter Bed Construction

APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B

Test Pit Logs Grain Size Analysis

TMl27‘)90l0l_l30I

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

..10

..3

11/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 200 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis

Technical

Memorandum,

_///XCG

Township of South Frontenac

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION XCG Consultants Ltd. (XCG) completed a site serviceability study of the subject located in Sunbury, Township of South Frontenac, Ontario. Mr. Brett Campbell is the current owner of this property and is planning to obtain development approvals from the Township and the County of Frontenac for the subject property. The serviceability study was needed to investigate the feasibility of providing wastewater disposal to the proposed new development. property

XCG Consultants Ltd. (XCG) was retained by Mr. Brett Campbell to complete a terrain analysis report as part of, and in support of, a Private Services Impact Assessment Report required by the Township of South Frontenac for a proposed plan of subdivision. The Township of South Frontenac Official Plan states that: Where residential development has been proposed of more than five (5) lots on individual, private water and sewage, and has been accepted via the results of a private servicing report, the Township will require a Private Services Impact Assessment Report to be prepared by the owner/developer and submitted for Township review and approval. The report is to demonstrate potable groundwater quality, adequate groundwater yield, negligible groundwater quality interference, soil suitability and su?ieient area available for ef?uent treatment and shall identify the location ofthe septic system, well and house. As part of the Private Servicing Report and in support of the Private Services Impact Assessment Report, a terrain analysis report indicating soil suitability and adequate available area for septic systems is required by the Township of South Frontenac.

The subject property is a piece of vacant land northwest of the intersection of Battersea Road (County Road 12) and Mooreland-Dixon Road. The proposed plan of subdivision is for the family property located in the hamlet of Sunbury to the west of Battersea Road and to the south of Clark Road. It is XCG’s understanding that this 35.6 hectare (88 acre) parcel is to be developed into 31 lots with an average lot size of approximately 0.8 hectares (2 acres) each. The main components of the study included the following:

Site terrain analysis that included test pit advancement, grain size distribution testing for soil characterization and soil percolation testing;
Preparation of an engineering report addressing the feasibility of private sewage disposal systems.

TM127990l0l_l30llS

Terrain Tech Memo Issued

ll/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

“

Page 201 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis

Technical Memorandum,

///xca

Township of South Frontenac

PRIVATE SEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

PRIVATESEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS This section presents the methodology and ?ndings of the terrain analysis of the project, including reporting on the results of the ?eld component investigations and providing an analysis, based on the ?eld information collected, regarding the feasibility of servicing the proposed development with private sewage disposal systems.

2.1

Field Investigations

2.1.1

Test Pit Investigation A test pit program was completed by XCG on November 1, 2010, encompassing the proposed 35.6 hectare residential development area. A total of thirty-one test pit locations were selected based on the proposed lot layout to provide for representative results across the property. A site plan showing the property boundaries and test pit locations can be found in Figure 1 below. The test pits were advanced to bedrock or to the maximum reach of the backhoe in all cases. Bedrock was encountered in all of the test pits, with the exception of one, at depths ranging from 0.18 metres to 2.32 metres. TP#6 was excavated to a depth of 2.4 metres, the maximum reach of the backhoe; bedrock was not encountered at that depth.

During the test pit program XCG staff logged each test pit for soil type, strata, depths and groundwater in?ltration. Test pit logs for each of the twenty test pits are included in the attached Appendix A Test Pit Logs. —

The soil conditions are consistent across the site with an overlying organic (topsoil) layer typically about 0.20 metres thick, underlain by a silty or sandy clay deposit to bedrock. The depth of silty clay extended from the bottom of the organic layer to the bedrock in each case, and is illustrated in the test pit logs, Appendix A. At the top of the ridge on site, the soil depth is less with just a shallow organic layer over the limestone bedrock. The most shallow soils observed were 0.25 metres in depth (TP#l2 & TP #19). 2.1.2

Soil Grain Size Analysis Based on the ?ndings of the test pit investigation XCG selected a representative number of soil samples from TP#5, TP#l5, TP#28 and TP#3l, and submitted them to DBA Engineering for grain size analysis. The results of the grain size analysis indicate that soil conditions across the site are reasonably consistent, made up primarily of mixtures of silt and clay with some sand and traces of gravel. Laboratory certi?cates of analysis are included in Appendix B Laboratory Certi?cates of Analysis. The ?ndings of the grain size analysis con?rmed the ?eld observations collected during test pit investigations, which indicated that the underlying soils are silty clays. —

TMl27990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo lssued

l 1/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 202 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

KEY MAP NOT TO SCALE

150

Fumcr

APPROXIMATE SCALE

LEGEND: APPROXIMATE PROFERTV BOUNDARIES

TEST WELL (JKD. 2010) TEST PIT

(XCG,2010) EXISTINGWATER WELL

nxuwma REFERENCE: Drlwing based on County nfFromcnac ma xca notes‘

nnlina:inlcnctivc mpg. MiO.E. well mums

NOTE: Locnlion nlbuilding, undergmundutilities, elc. m Inr referance only and xhnuld not be relied upon for

dmiled design, movninn, I71’ccnnruclian purposes. Pmpcrly boundary ma building locntiuns shown nuy not repmcm mm! surveyad boundu-ias.

XCG CONSIILTANTSLTD. SHEET: R12799owwU2HG01-pdf

“TE

FILE: R.i2799o1oxoo2FlGo1.dwg

JAN. 201 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

JOB N°'

“WEE

1_2799_o1_.o1

Page 203 of 320

No’

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis

///xca 2.1.3

Technical

Memorandum,

Township of South Frontenac

PRIVATESEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

Percolation Testing In order to determine the percolation rate in the native soil on the subject site, XCG performed two percolation tests in the two distinct areas on the property. One percolation test was completed in the central part of the back ?eld in the northwestern portion of the site and the second percolation test was completed in the forested section in the north central portion of the sites. The percolation tests were completed on October 28, 2010, in the manner speci?ed in Appendix 3 of the 0n—Site Sewage Systems Code & Guidelines, 2006 Professional Edition that contains Section 8 of the Ontario Building Code. A 200 mm by 200 mm hole was excavated in the soil layer to be testing for percolation rate, which was the clay layer beneath the topsoil in the ?eld and the organic layer in the wooded area. As per the Building Code procedure, smeared soils were removed from the sides of the excavation to allow proper contact with the soil. XCG completed the soil saturation procedure as outlined in the Building Code procedure, and subsequently monitored the water level in the excavation to determine the percolation rate. For the first test, the water level in the excavation dropped 9 to 10 cm after 8 hours, which is consistent with soils having a percolation rate of approximately 50 minutes/centimetre. The second test was conducted on the organic top soil material that is located on top of the ridge and this soil had a much higher percolation rate (<10 minutes/cm).

Based on the percolation test results conducted in the ?eld that represents the majority of the site and the observation of similar soil properties across the site, it was determined that no further percolation testing was required. The results of the percolation testing indicate that the native soils at the site are not acceptable for the installation of in-ground Class 4 septic systems, and raised bed systems with suitable imported soil for the septic bed would be required. 2.2

Assessment

2.2.1

Calculation of Wastewater Flow In order to complete this assessment a number of assumptions will be used to assess the feasibility of on-site septic systems. The residential lots in the proposed development will each contain a single family home with a maximum of ?ve (5) bedrooms, with a maximum footprint of approximately 235 m2(2500 ftz).

of Feasibility of Class 4 Disposal

Systems

Division B, Part 8, of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) was reviewed to determine the design wastewater ?ows for this type of residential development. Using Table 8.2.l.3.A. from Ontario Regulation 350/06 (amended to O.Reg. 208/08), under the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, a ?ve bedroom dwelling has a base total daily design sanitary sewage flow of 2,500 L/day. XCG has assumed that there will be no more than 20 ?xture units in each home and, therefore, no additional ?ow for extra ?xtures has been included. For dwellings over 200 m2in footprint, an additional 100 L/day is added to the base ?ow for each 10 m2of basement footprint over 200 m2 and under 400 m2.Therefore these homes will have an additional ?ow, based on footprint, of 400 L/day, resulting in a total daily design ?ow of 2,900 L/day. TMl2'7990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

ll/2]/20l2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 204 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum, Township of South Frontenac

///xca

PRIVATESEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

Because the ?ows are less than 5,000 L/day, a Class 4 septic system may be used to treat this wastewater. The septic tank should be sized to double the daily ?ow and therefore should be at least 5,800 litres (1,275 imperial gallons). 2.2.2

Disposal Bed Sizing Based on the ?eld work and grain size analysis, the percolation time of the native soils is equivalent to 50 minutes/cm (T=50). Therefore a fully raised leaching bed is required for each lot in this development. Because the size of the bed may be a factor in number of lots to be developed on this property, the type of bed that produces the smallest footprint was selected. Therefore, a ?lter bed system was assessed rather than an absorption trench system.

According to Section 8.7.5.2 (4) of the OBC, for ?lter beds with loading rates of less than 3,000 L/day, the effective area of the ?lter bed shall be calculated so that the loading on the surface does not exceed 75 L/mlper day and the leaching bed may be comprised of more than one ?lter bed, each of similar size and adjacent to each other. This area is calculated by dividing the design ?ow by the loading rate, resulting in a total area of 39 ml.As ?lter beds must have an area of between 10 and 50 m2,only one (1) ?lter bed is for each system. Figure 2 below shows raised ?lter bed construction. The area of the extension of the base of the ?lter is calculated using the formula outlined in Section 8.7.5.4 (6) of the OBC and this area shall have a thickness of 0.25 metres: A = QT/850, which in this case is equal to 171 m2.

The ?nal area to calculate for the ?lter bed is the area of the imported leaching bed ?ll. This is required as the underlying native soil has a T-time of greater than 50. Therefore the loading rate on this ?ll (from Table 8.7.4.] (A)) is 4 L/m2/day. Again using the ?ow divided by the loading rate results in an area of 725 m2.This imported ?ll layer must be 0.25 cm thick as well and represents the ?nal footprint of the leaching bed. XCG also calculated the footprint of the leaching bed if absorption trenches were used, and this calculation resulted in a slightly larger footprint of 788 m2. Therefore the maximum footprint required for the fully raised septic bed is 788 m2. The depth of the ?lter bed must be equal to at least 0.9 metres above the native soil that has a T-time greater than 50 (or bedrock or the high groundwater table). This 0.9 metres includes the 0.25 metre thick ?lter bed extension layer and the 0.25 metre thick imported leaching bed ?ll layer.

TMl27990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

11/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 205 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum, Township of South Frontenac

///XCG

PRIVATE SEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

Sunineallud?nsmd?u

s.T|nk

Figure 2

Raised Filter Bed Construction

There must be a planned contingency area where an additional leaching bed may be located in the event that the leaching bed reaches its lifespan and another bed must be constructed. There are also additional considerations for set—backsas well. No part of the leaching bed may extend to less than 5 metres from the property line. The loading area of the ?lter bed must extend a minimum of 15 metres beyond the outer distribution piping in the direction of the ?ow. The lot size calculations are based on the requirements of the Ontario Building Code for septic systems and their sizing. Based on the calculations above, it is physically possible to have room on a 8,100 m2(two acre) lot for a leaching bed, a contingency bed area, septic tank and associated pumping chamber and a 230 m2(2500 ftz) house. The con?guration of each lot is dependent on the shape and slope of the lot.

TMl27990l0]_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

1 1/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

n Page 206 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum, Township of South Frontenac

///xca 2. 2.3

PR/VATE SEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guideline D—5—4 describes requirements regarding the assessment of the potential impact on groundwater caused by proposed developments on individual on-site sewage systems (sub-surface sewage systems). This guideline applies only to those areas of the Province which have not been designated under Notice 3/87 as subject to MOEE Guideline B-7, Incorporation of the Reasonable Use Concept into MOEE Groundwater Management Activities (formerly MOEE Policy 15-08). In areas so designated, the proposed development must comply with the requirements of MOEE Guideline B-7 and its associated guidelines.

The guideline re?ects the Ministry’s experience with development utilizing individual on-site sewage systems, and emphasizes the need to minimize the potential for adverse groundwater impacts resulting from their use. For the purposes of implementation of Ministry Policy 15-08, Large Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems are de?ned as a subsurface system that: a)

has an average daily flow greater than 4,500 L/d;

serves

serves more than ?ve private residences/dwelling units with adjacent individual sub-surface sewage systems and which will be located in a municipality or an area of a municipality designated by the Part VII Director, and/or the Regional Director of the Ministry of the Environment; or

(1)

serves any institution, industrial or commercial establishment.

more than ?ve private residences/dwelling units, with a communal subsurface sewage system; or

but does not include a sub—surfacesewage system that: e)

serves an institutional, industrial or commercial establishment with an average daily ?ow less than 4,500 L/d whose waste water consists solely of sewage of domestic origin, which is human body waste, toilet or other bathroom waste, and liquid or water-bome culinary sink waste. According to these de?nitions, the individual on-site septic systems are not classi?ed as Large Subsurface Sewage Disposal Systems and Policy D-5-4 is applicable; not the Reasonable Use Concept policy.

Step One of Procedure D-5-4 involves lot size considerations. If the lots of the development are one (1) hectare (2.5 acres) or larger, the risk that the boundary limits imposed by these guidelines may be exceeded by individual systems is considered acceptable in most cases. Developments consisting of lots which average 1 ha (with no lot being smaller than 0.8 ha) may not require a detailed hydrogeological assessment, provided that it can be demonstrated that the area is not hydrogeologically sensitive. It is assumed that attenuative processes within a one hectare lot will be suf?cient to reduce the nitrate-nitrogen to an acceptable concentration in groundwater below adjacent properties.

TMl27990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

l l/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 207 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum,

]//XCG

Township of South Frontenac

PRIVATE SEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

The lots in consideration for this project are to be less than 1 ha and therefore additional steps in the Procedure must be followed.

Step Two involves assessing the potential risk to groundwater supply aquifers. In this assessment the most probable groundwater receiver must be evaluated through defendable hydrogeological data including test pits and test drilling programs. The potential for these systems to be isolated must be assessed on geologic, hydraulic and hydrogeologic considerations and may go beyond the site in question. This approach is beyond the scope of this project and therefore the third option was used for groundwater impact assessment. Step Three involves assessment of contaminant attenuation, which can be completed using various methodologies. The first method involves monitoring—based assessments using either an existing development or monitoring of a phased development over time. Again, this method was not used and the predictive assessment methodology was used to assess the contaminant attenuation. This calculation is done based on nitrate as a representative contaminant in the wastewater.

For background data for nitrate in the sur?cial aquifer at this site, XCG used the arithmetic average of the nitrate levels found in the ?ve test wells during the pumping tests (see hydrogeologic report). For the purposes of the contaminant attenuation calculation, XCG assumed a background concentration of nitrate in the sur?cial aquifer of 1.52 mg/L. In most cases total nitrogen (all species) converted to nitrate-nitrogen is considered as the critical contaminant. For the purposes of predicting the potential for groundwater impacts, a nitrate loading of at least 40 grams/lot/day per residential

dwelling unit shall normally be used. This is based on actual loadings of 1000 L/day and a minimum value of 40 mg/L nitrate-nitrogen in the discharge from a Class 4 or Class 6 system treating domestic/household sewage. Only dilution is considered as an attenuation mechanism for nitrate. The dilution would be provided by recharge from precipitation and from the septic systems

themselves. XCG reviewed the recently completed Water Budget Report for the Cataraqui

Region Source Protection Area for estimates of precipitation and recharge into the groundwater system. According to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) document, the average annual rainfall for the Kingston area is 900 mm and the average annual recharge is 155 mm. Therefore, the average daily recharge is 0.425 mm (0.000425 m).

According to Procedure D-5-4, the septic systems themselves can provide dilution contributions of 1000 litres per lot. The nitrate load of 40 g NO;/lot/day was applied and an iterative process was used to determine the maximum number of lots that could be developed before the limit of 10 mg/L N03 was reached in the groundwater. TM 1279901017130] 18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued 1 1/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

n Page 208 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis Technical Memorandum,

///XCG

Township of South Frontenac

PRIVATESEWAGEDISPOSALSYSTEMS

XCG has made the assumption that the recharge rate is an average annual number and can be applied across the entire property minus the non-contributing impervious areas as an average value. The impervious areas for this development were calculated based on roadways, driveways and roofs. In this case the entire pervious area of the property is 33.8 ha. This area was multiplied by the recharge rate, and the dilution flow from the septic systems was added. The resulting maximum number of

lots on this development is 38 for the water quality impact assessment. There for this subdivision will be able to support the proposed 31 lots with on-site Class 4 septic systems.

TM l27990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo Issued

11/21/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 209 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis

Technical

Memorandum,

Township of South Frontenac

I//XCG 3.

CONCLUSIONS

CONCLUSIONS The key ?ndings of this serviceability report are summarized below:

The proposed residential development will support a maximum of 38 lots. Therefore the proposed 31 lots are feasible in terms of water quality impact assessment.
The proposed 8,100 m2(two acre) lots will support a leaching bed, a contingency bed area, septic tank and associated pumping chamber, and a 230 m2(2500 ftz) house. Either a ?lter bed or absorption trench system may be used.
Native soils at the site are made up primarily of mixtures of silt and clay with some sand and traces of gravel, and have a percolation rate which equals or exceeds the 50 centimetre/minute requirement, resulting in the need for raised bed Class 4 septic systems with suitable imported soil for the septic bed.

’l’Ml27990l0l_l30l

18 Terrain Tech Memo lssucd

ll/Zl/2012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

n Page 210 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Imam Analysis Tochnicad m,

H///X06

Township of South Frontenac

APPE/vmces

AFPENDIX A TEST Prr Loss

‘[‘MI27‘?90l0l_l3(?l 18 Terrain Tech Memo kill?d

IV11/21/Z012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 211 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 212 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 1 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logged by: K.O. client: Bren Campbell Chockod By: Locatlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Sail

Sandy Clay brown

Boulder.No Bedrock

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Dafum:NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Sheet: 1 0! 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 213 of 320

Depth\Elev GraphicReading Log (m) LVapour

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 2 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Projectzsunbury Hydrogeologlcalstudy

L099:; db y: KO

client: Brett Campbell Checked

By:

Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown

Shale Bedrock

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Damm: NA

Dale Excavated: November 1, 2010

sheet

||n||||||I3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

1 OH

0 0

Page 214 of 320

Graphic Depth Vapour Reading Depth\Elev Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 3 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy Logged by: K.O.

Client: Bren Campbell

checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

cla y brown with gravel

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum:NA

Dale Excavated: November 1. 2010

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 215 of 320

Vapour Dep?1\Elev GraphicReading Log(rn)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testpltl Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project:

Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logged by: K0.

client: Brett Campbell Checked

By:

Locatlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

clay brown with gravel

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 2. 2010

Datum: NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 216 of 320

Graphic Vapour Depth\Elev Reading Log(In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tcstplt 5 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy Logged by: K.O.

Client: Brett Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Sol! CI: y brown trace sand trace gravel

EXCSVBTOTI

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum:NA

Dale Excavated: November 1, 2010 Sheet: 1 uf 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

:1:

Page 217 of 320

Depth Reading Vapour Depth\Elev Graphic Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tastplt 6 Project No: 1-2799-O1-01

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logged

by: K.0.

Checked

By:

Client: Brett Campbell Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Cl: y light brown some gravel

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavaled: November 1. 2010

Datun-u:NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 218 of 320

Graphic Vapour Reading Depth\Elev Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log ol Testplt 7 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeological Study Logged by: KID’

client: Brett Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Dale Excavated: November 1, 2010 sheen 1 OH

M |1’||Ir|nn'1lI}_|r

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 219 of 320

Vapour Depth\Elev Graphic Depth Reading Log(n1)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 8 Projeci No: 1-2799-O1-01

P rojec t:S unbury HydrogeoIcg Ica ISQudy

Logged bymlol

client: Brett Campbell Checked

By:

Locatlon: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

clay brown with gravel trace send some boulders

Boulder, No Bedrock

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1‘2010

Datum: NA

Sheet: 1 0‘ 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 220 of 320

Vapour Reading Graphic Depth\Elev Log(rn)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 9 Project No: 1~2799-O1-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy Logged by: K40!

Client: BrenCampbell Checked By:

Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground surface Top Soil

Clay brown with sand with gravel

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Daium:NA

Date Excavated: November 1. 2010

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 221 of 320

Vapour Deplh\Elev Reading (rn)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 10 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project:

Sunbury Hydrogeo|og|ca| Study

Logged by: K.O,

Client: Brett Campbell

Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground surface Top Soil

clay brown trace sand trace gravels trace bounders

Bottom of Test Flt

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum:NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 222 of 320

Graphic Vapour Log(In) Depth\Elev Reading

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tastplt 11 Project No: 1-2799-01-D1

Projecusunbury

Hydrogeologlcalstudy

. , Lngga db y: KO

Cllantz BrettCampbell Checked By:

Locatlon: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface

rap Soil Sandy clay brown trace gravel wet

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 sheet

1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Depth\EIev GraphicReading Log(rn)

L’_ Page 223 of 320 Vapo

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Teslplt 12 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Projecnsunbury

Hydrogeologlcalstudy

Logga db y: K0 ,

client: Brett Campbell

Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground surface Top Soil. clay brown clay tall grass

Bedrock

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TES T P” REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Da1um:NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 224 of 320

Graphic Vapour Reading Depih\EIev Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 13 Project No: 1-2799-O1-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy

Low“

by: K0’

Cllontz Bretl Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown some boulders wet

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TES1’ PIT REPORT

Dafumi NA

Date Excavated: November 1. 2010

sheet 1 DH

toII

. 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

n…I….l2

0L 0

Page 225 of 320

Vapour Depth Reading Depth\Elev Graphic Log(rn)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tastplt14 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logged by: K0.

Client: BreltCampbell

Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Descriptlon

Ground Surlace Top Soil

Sandy

Clay

loose brown with gravel wlth boulders we!

Bottomof Test PI!

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavaled: November 1. 2010

Dalum7NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 226 of 320

Vapour Graphic Depth\Elev Reading Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 15 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy Logged by: K0.

client: Bren Campbell Checked By:

Locatlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground surface Top Soil Clay brown gravelly with sand with boulders

Sand Clay brown gravelly with sand wlth boulders

Bottomof Test Plt

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TE ST PIT REP 0’"

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 Shed: 1 of 1

DepIh\Elev (n1)

OI 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 227 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 16 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeological Study

Logged by: K0’

client: BrettCampbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface

Fractured

Bedrock

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum: NA

Sheet

1 O‘ 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 228 of 320

Vapour Depth\EIev Graphic Reading Log(In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testpl! 17 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy Logged by: K0.

cllent: Bret!Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown loose clay brown with gravel

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum:NA

Date Excavatedz November 1. 2010

Sheet: 1 ol 1

nulunuul?

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 229 of 320

Vapour Depth\Elev Graphic Depth Reading Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 18 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Project: Sunbury Hydrogeoioglcal Study

Logged by: K0.

client: Brett Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown some gravel

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Sheet: 1 of 1

:nLu:u«i=:‘ .-

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

0 0

Page 230 of 320

Graphic Depth Vapour Reading Depth\Eiev Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 19 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Projoctsunbury

Hydrogeologlcalstudy

Logga db y: KO

Client: Bron Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic Material loose tall grass Bedrock

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 Sheet

1 OH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 231 of 320

Vapour Depth\E|ev GraphicReading Log (m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 20 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Pro] ac t: Sunbu ry HYdro9eolo9 lcalstud y

Logged by: K0.

cuem:Brett Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Yop Soil

clay brown gravel

Bedrock broken

Ground Surlace elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum: NA

Sheet

1 OH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 232 of 320

Vapour Reading Graphic Depth\Elev Log(In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testpll 21 Project No: 1-2799-01-O1 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study Logged by: K.O.

client: Brett Campbell Checked By: Locntlon: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic

Matcrlal

plant material

Sandy Clay brown gravel

Sandy Clay brown boulders

Excavator:

Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Su?aoe elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Daturn:NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 Sheet: 1 of 1

‘—-o

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Vapour Depth\EIev GraphicReading Log(m)

}.-.

Page 233 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 22 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury HydrogeologlcalStudy

Logged by: Ktol

Cllemz Brett Campbell

Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic Material dark brown

cla y dark brown trace sand trace gravel

Boulders large broken bedrock

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Damrn: NA

Dale Excavated: November 1, 2010

sheet

nn||l|||||3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

1 of 1

o o

Page 234 of 320

Vapour Depth Graphic Depth\E|ev Reading Log(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 23 Projccl No: 1-2799-01-01 P r ojectzsunbu WHYdroQeoloQIcE Istud y

Logged by: K.O.

Cllantz BrettCampbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic Matorlal dark brown

Cl: y brown gravel Bedrock

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TE S T PlT REPO RT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1‘ 2010

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 235 of 320

Dep(h\Elev Vapour Reading (m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 24

///XCG

Project No: 1-2799-O1-O1 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logged by: K0.

Client: Bretl Campbell

Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic Sail dark brown

Clay brown trace sand trace gravel

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum: NA

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 236 of 320

Vapour Graphic Depth\Elev Reading Log(111)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tostplt 25 Project No: 1-2799-O1-O1

Project: Sunbury Hydrogaologlcal Study

Logged by: K.0. client: Brett Campbell

Checked By: Locatlon: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Smy Cla y brown some gravel

Bottomof Test Plt

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 237 of 320

Depth\Elev (In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 26 Project No: 1-2799-01-01

Illstd ca un ury y rogeoog P’t:SbHd rojec

u y

Logged bymvo‘

client: Brent Campbell Checked By: Locallon: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown loose

Cla y brown with gravel

Bottomof Test Pit

Ground Surface elevation: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Daie Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum: NA

Sheet

1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 238 of 320

Vapour Reading Depth\EIev (m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Tastplt 27 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Projact: Sunburyt-1YdroQeolo 9 |ca|St udy

Logged by:K.O,

cum: Brett Campbell chucked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Clay brown trace gravel

Bottom o1Taat PII

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum: NA

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010 Sheet 1 of 1

J 2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 239 of 320

Vapour Depth\Elev Reading (In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testpltza Project No: 1-2799-O1-01

P rojec t:S unbury Hyd rogeoIogIca |St udy

LOW“ bymvol

Cllom: Brett Campbell Checked By: Location: Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy clay brown some gravel few boulders

Bottom of Test Pll

Ground Surface elevatiun: NA

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Dale Excavated: November 1, 2010

Da1um:NA

Sheet

1 OH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 240 of 320

Vapour Reading Depth\Elev (rn)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 29 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Projuct: Sunbury Hydrogeoioglcal Study Logged by: K.O.

cllent: Brett Campbell

Checked By: Locatlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top soil wet

Sandy Olay brown

Bottom of Test Pol

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Datum:NA

Date Excavaled: November 1, 2010

Sheet: 1 of 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 241 of 320

Vapour Depth\Elev GraphicReading (m) Log

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 30 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 P rojec t:S unbury HydrogeoIogIca IS! udy

Logged by: K0.

client: Brett Campbell Checked

By:

Locatlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Top Soil

Sandy Cla y brown gravel

Bottomof Test Pll

Ground Surface elevation: M

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

TEST PIT REPORT

Date Excavated: November 1, 2010

Datum: NA

sheet

1 OH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 242 of 320

Graphic Vapour Rmding Depth\Elev Log(In)

AGENDA ITEM #

Log of Testplt 31 Project No: 1-2799-01-01 Project: Sunbury Hydrogeologlcal Study

Logge db y: KO .

Client: Brett Campbell checked

By:

Locmlonz Sunbury

Description

Ground Surface Organic Material dark brown clayey

Shale Bedrock

Excavator: Excavator Type: Backhoe

Ground Surface elevation: NA

TEST PIT REPORT

Damrn: NA

Date Excavatedz November 1, 2010 sheet

1 OH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 243 of 320

Vapour Depth\Elev GraphicReading Lag(m)

AGENDA ITEM #

Terrain Analysis

TccnnaicaiMemorandum, Tuwnship cf South Fmnvanac

//IXCG‘

APPENDICES

APPENDIX B GRAINSIZE ANALYSIS

I8 Terrain Tech Memo Issuxcd TMl27‘990iOl7l30l

H/Z1/Z012

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 244 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 245 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FROM

Nov

2010

8:20/ST.

DBA Engineering

9:18/No.?soooooss4

Grain Size Analysis

LAB NUMBER: 9345«A

PROJECT NUMBER: I0-I632-02 PROJECT: CONTRACT: CLIENT: XCG

CONTRACTOR: PROJECT SITE:

SAMPLEDBY: Client DATE SAMPLED: I-Nov-10 SUPPLIER: SAMPLE LOCATION: Test Pit #5 BOREHOLE No

SAMPLE DEPTH

DESCRIPTION: Silt wilh Clay same Sand, Imcc oIGmveI DATE TESTED: 8»NoV-10

SPECIFICATION: COMMENTS:

TESTED BY: COS

I00

20 I0

0.001

0.0|

0.1

100

Equivalent Grain Diameterin Millimctcvs

?ne clay

medium silt

I coarse

fine

I medium I coarse sand

line gravel

SOL-325-00

L.»

:4: 0 O o Passing PercentU:

G -bx

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 246 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

(uEn)Nov

FROM

2010

8:18/No.75000OO334

8:21lsT.

Grain Size

DBA Engineering

Anal!

LAB NUMBER: 9345-B PROJECT NUMBER: I0-I632-02 PROJECT: CONTRACT: CLIENT: XCG CONTRACTOR: PROJECT SITE: SAMPLED BY: Client

DATE SAMPLED: 1-Nov-IO SUPPLIER: SAMPLE LOCATION: Test Pit #28

SAMPLE DEPTH

BOREI-IOLENo

DESCRIPTION:Clay and Silumccof Sand DATE TESTED: 8—Nov-10

SPECIFICATION: COMMENTS:

TESTED BY: COS _

100

…_

_ ‘__

20 10

0.01

0.001

100

EquivalentGrain Diameter in Millimeters ?ne

(\t‘\I

an:

coarse

medium sxlt

?ne

medium sand

coarse

medium gavel

coarse

m c

O Passing8 PercentUs

6#1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 247 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FROM

<vlED)Nov

2010

8:22/ST.

9:19/No.7sooooos:34

DBA Engineering

Grain Size Analysis

LAB NUMBER: 9345-C

PROJECT NUMBER: l0—l632-O2 PROJECI‘:

CONTRACT: CLIENT: XCG

CONTRACTOR: PROJECT SITE: SAMPLED BY: Client DATE SAMPLED: 1-Nov—10 SUPPLIER: SAMPLE IDCATTON: TLSIPi! #31

BOREHOLE No

SAMPLE DEPTH

DESCRIPTION: Claycy SiIt,Some Sand

DATE TESTED: 8-Nov-10 SPECIFICATION: COMMENTS:

TESTED BY: COS

100

–

J L-

-—

‘ 1

0.01

0.001

‘

0.1

100

EquivalentGrain Diameterin Millimctczs I

?ne clay

I medium I coarse

I medium I

fine

sill

coarse

?ne

sand

medium

coarse

gravel

SOL-325-DO

Ln s. O1 IPassing l‘. I Percent

J: 0

. .

\l Ol4IuxI

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 248 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # Nov

FROM

8:18/No.75000OO33d

3:24/s1’.

2010

DBA Engineering LAB NUMBER: 9345-D

Size Ana|¥sis

mouse-r NUMBER: 10-1632-02 pnonzcr:

cormucr:

cmznm xcc coumuc-ron: rnon-zcrsum: SAMPLE!)

m 37.5 mm

BY: Client

DATE SAMPLED: 1-Nov-l0 SUPPLIER: SAMPLE LOCATION: Tm Fit #15 SAMPLE DEPTH

BOREHOLENo DESCRIPTION:Silly C|ay,Some Sand DATE TESTED: 8-Nov-10

SPECIFICATION: COMMENTS:

TESTED BY: COS

_L;——

|’

04-—

0.1

0.0l

0.00l

-———

100

Equivalent Gain Diameterin Millimeter:

clay

?ne

medium

coarse

?ne gravel

S OL~325-00

Lu 0

L)-

o 3Percent0 Passingax

\l OI

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

‘I 0 \O m

Page 249 of 320

M w

AGENDA ITEM #

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Prepared for: 2628100 Ontario Inc. Steve McLure

Prepared by: FOREFRONT Engineering Inc. 1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8

613.634.9009 tel 888.884.9392 fax

Date: November 2019

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 250 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report has been prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc. (Consultant) for the benefit of the Client in accordance with their Agreement. The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report: 1.

is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report;

represents Consultant’s judgement in light of the limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports;

may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified;

has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time and circumstances in which it was prepared; and

must be read as a whole and sections should not be read out of context.

Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared. Any estimates or opinions regarding expected construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant’s judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Consultant does not make any representations, with respect to such estimates or opinions, and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from them. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; as required by law; or to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report, except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 251 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210

613 634 9009 tel

Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8

888.884.9392 fax

November 26, 2019

Steve McLure 2628100 Ontario Inc. Dear Mr. McLure Regarding:

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

The enclosed report details the existing drainage conditions and provides recommendations for stormwater management for the proposed Sunbury Subdivision. It is recommended that roadside enhanced grass swale type stormwater management features be developed to mitigate any adverse water quantity and quality effects that site run-off may have on the downstream network. Drainage easements are required for the low lying area on Lot 1, realignment of the intermittent channel and rear yard enhanced swales. Preliminary facility details are contained in this report, along with recommended maintenance procedures. If you have any enquiries or wish to discuss further, please contact this office. Sincerely, FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

Kyle Nielissen, P.Eng. Civil Engineer Kyle.Nielissen@Forefronteng.ca KN:kn Encl. cc:

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 252 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 253 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Table of Contents Statement of Qualifications and Limitations Letter of Transmittal Pa ge

Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1

Existing Site Condition …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2

Proposed Development ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 3.1 3.2

3.3 3.4

Drainage Plan …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Quantity……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 3.2.1 Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 3.2.1.1 Design Storm Events ……………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.2.1.2 Hydrology ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 3.2.1.3 Pre-Development Flows …………………………………………………………………………… 6 3.2.1.4 Post Development Flows ………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Water Quality ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 3.3.1 Enhanced Swales ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 Maintenance …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10

Quality Control (Short Term) ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11

Conclusions ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 11

Appendices Appendix A • Draft Plan • Figure 2- Existing Catchments Plan • Figure 3- Proposed Minor Catchments Plan • Figure 4 – Proposed Major Catchments Plan • Typical Road Cross Section Appendix B • Grain Size Analysis • Short Duration Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data • Table 3-1: Surface Cover Parameter Calculations • Pervious / Impervious Area Calculations • 100-Year Event Pre-Development Modeling • 100-Year Event Uncontrolled Post Development Modeling

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 254 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Introduction

Forefront has assembled relevant supporting information for the proposed residential development at Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2, Township of South Frontenac. The proposed Sunbury Development by 2628100 Ontario Inc. is located in the hamlet of Sunbury in the Township of South Frontenac – west of Battersea Road (County Road 11), south of Randy Clark Road and north of Moreland Dixon Road. The property is bounded by existing dwellings and commercial properties along Battersea Road to the east, existing dwellings along Morland Dixon Road to the south, agricultural lands and residential dwellings to the north, agricultural lands and Gerald Ball Memorial Park to the west. The property includes frontage on Battersea Road between the existing dwellings. Refer to Figure 1: Location Plan for the site location.

Figure 1: Location Plan (Image Courtesy of County of Frontenac Maps) The proposed Sunbury Subdivision proposes approximately 31 single family residential lots, a new municipal street including roadside ditches with a single connection to Battersea Road. Development of the Sunbury Subdivision will result in an increase in impervious surfaces and could potentially impact stormwater quantity and quality. This development may have potential impacts on the natural drainage and environment. The report recommends mitigation measures and provides recommendations for the preliminary design of the site. Refer to Appendix A, Draft Plan for the proposed development plan.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 255 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Existing Site Condition

The site and surrounding affected drainage area total approximately 72.0 hectares. The proposed development area is currently predominately used for agricultural purposes and is approximately 31.66 hectares. A large portion of the existing subject site and surrounding areas drain towards an intermittent channel in the south portion of the site. The channel drains to field and wooded areas to the west of the site and proceeds southeast across the subject property, flowing easterly to an existing low-lying area onsite. Outlet 1 consists of a 500mm diameter culvert passing under Battersea Road, directly south of the Battersea Road and Sunbury Road intersection. Beyond the subject property, the channel drains easterly eventually outletting to Bear Creek. Runoff from several existing residential properties fronting Battersea Road, a portion of the subject site and a portion of Battersea Road drain south to Outlet 1, conveyed by roadside ditches along Battersea Road. Note, the existing 500mm culvert crossing under Sunbury Road at Outlet 1 is sized for the minor event. It Is expected that it surcharges during the major storm event. The low lying area directly to the west of the culvert provides storage for flooding during major storm events. This area is to be maintained as is and it is recommended that a drainage easement be provided to the Township on the proposed Lot 1. The northern portion of the subject site drains to a wetland in the north east corner of the property. The north wetland area discharges to Outlet 2 and drains under Battersea Road directly south of the Randy Clark Road intersection eventually discharging to Bear Creek. Catchment Area E3 drains east to Outlet 3 along the roadside ditches on Battersea Road directed north easterly eventually discharging to Bear Creek. To the south of the subject site there is a small storm sewer system in Sunbury that serves the Battersea Road / Moreland Dixon Road intersection that outlets to a watercourse north of the General Store. This watercourse begins south of Moreland Dixon Road, collecting runoff from the roadside swale along Moreland Dixon Road, and continues through the rear of the civic #3769, the General Store property. This watercourse passes under Battersea Road and ultimately drains east towards Bear Creek. Ecological Services completed an Environmental Site Assessment of the subject property. Refer to Part of Lots 25 and 26, Concession 2 Environmental Site Assessment (2013) and updated in 2018 for further details regarding the natural environment. The 2013 Terrain Analysis completed by XCG conducted a test pit program and soil grain analysis for the subject site. The soil grain analysis demonstrates that the site is mainly silty clay loam. Bedrock was encountered in all test pits and depths of bedrock ranged from 0.18m to 2.32m. Please refer to Appendix A, Figure 2: Existing Catchment Areas, for the pre-development condition details.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 256 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Proposed Development

Thirty one residential lots are proposed on the subject site. Lots sizes range from 0.61 hectares (1.5 acres) to 3.41 hectares (8.42 acres) in area. The total development area is 31.66 hectares, including the lot addition. The development will consist of a single roadway approximately 1.2km in length with a cul-de-sac at the terminus. A new intersection is proposed connecting to Battersea Road. Existing major flow paths will be maintained with the proposed drainage and stormwater infrastructure being designed for stormwater quality, the minor and major storm events. Given the topography of the site and number of outlets onsite, a number of conveyance controls are required to maintain the flow regime to pre-development conditions. Outlets that experienced concentrated flows and sheet flows under pre-development condition are expected to maintain relatively similar flow characteristics post development.

3.1

Drainage Plan

Roadside, side yard and rear yard ditches are proposed throughout the development. Areas proposed for development will drain to the enhanced roadside ditches (with flat bottoms and rock check dams) with the remaining areas generally being intercepted by the enhanced rear yard swales. In cases where the roadside ditch slope is greater than 1.5% it is recommended that front yard filters strips be provided on the individual lots. The roadside ditches and rear yard swales will convey runoff (both minor and major flows) to Outlet 1 in the south and Outlet 2 in the north. Approximately three lots are proposed to drain to Outlet 3, the roadside ditch on Battersea Road flowing north easterly. Approximately 51.66 hectares will discharge to enhanced rear yard and roadside ditches outletting the subject property at Outlet 1. For the north portion of the site, approximately 2.51 hectares is to remain undeveloped wetland, 15.58 hectares will discharge to enhanced rear yard and roadside ditches. The area is proposed to drain to the existing low-lying wetland area in the north east corner of the site outletting to Outlet 2. Approximately 2.25 hectares will drain to Outlet 3, the roadside ditch along Battersea Road. The roadside ditch is to be sized to convey the minor and major storm events including 0.3m freeboard. Driveway culverts are to be sized for the minor storm event. Culverts passing under the road are to be sized for the 100 year event. Enhanced ditches can be incorporated along the roadway, refer to Appendix A for a Proposed Road CrossSection. It is recommended that these enhanced swales will incorporate flat bottoms, check dams and grasses that will provide sufficient quality and quantity control onsite. They will promote infiltration, sediment capture, and filtration. Quantity and quality control is to be provided by the enhanced swales and check dams. Concentrated outlet locations will be enhanced with rip-rap and geotextile to prevent erosion downstream. Quality controls are proposed for the site area of 31.66 hectares. In instances where the slope of the roadside ditch or lot is greater than 2.0% it is not practical to provide an enhanced swale. In these cases, front yard filter strips are proposed.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 257 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

No direct quality or quantity control is proposed for drainage areas external to the development. Design of the enhanced swales is as per the Ministry of the Environment Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual design guidance for grassed swales. Lot level conveyance controls and further details will be provided during detailed design of the grading and drainage for these areas, these details will be depicted on the final engineering drawings. The intermittent channel that serves the low-lying area west of the site is proposed to be realigned along the future side lot lines and intercepted by the roadside ditch. Please refer to Appendix A, Figure 3 and 4; Proposed Minor Catchment Areas and Proposed Major Catchment Areas, for the post-development condition details.

3.2

Quantity

Urbanization leads to an increase in impermeable surfaces (rooftops and driveway areas). The resultant increased peak flows increase the risk to life, environment and property damage. Water quantity control is generally required when there will be downstream quantity impacts. Consistent with general Stormwater Management practices, both stormwater quality and quantity control is proposed for the development site. Post development flows will be maintained to pre-development levels for all storm events up to and including the 100 year design event. Minor storm drainage systems will be designed for the 5 year design event in accordance with the Township standards.

3.2.1

Analysis

The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the site was conducted using a recent version of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s StormWater Management Model (SWMM5). The model has been widely used in similar stormwater management analyses in Ontario and is recognized as a reliable modeling technique for estimating predevelopment and post development hydrologic and hydraulic responses for both rural and urban watersheds.

•

Hydrology: the generation of stormwater runoff from the various catchment surfaces in response to rainfall. The hydrologic module of SWMM5 was used in this study to simulate the surface runoff and abstraction characteristics of land surfaces (i.e., evapotranspiration, infiltration, and surface storage) in response to meteorological inputs. It is a dynamic computer model that uses a non-linear reservoir approximation to represent overland flow. The hydrology module requires input data that describes the characteristics of local rainfall, overland flow, land use, and soil properties. Results include flow hydrographs for sub-catchment areas that were used as input to the hydraulic routing module. Hydraulics: the conveyance, attenuation, and routing of stormwater through the collection system and storage/treatment facilities. The hydraulic module of SWMM5 was used in this study to represent the complex hydraulics of open channel watercourses, piped collection systems, surface storage, overland flow routes, and SWM facilities (including swales, detention/retention ponds and associated control structures such as orifices and weirs). It is a dynamic computer model that accounts for the conservation of mass and momentum using the Saint-Venant equations for gradually varied unsteady flow.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 258 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

3.2.1.1

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Design Storm Events

Design storm events were based on IDF rainfall statistics that describe the frequency of rainfall depths over a specified duration. Rainfall intensities with various durations and return periods for the site were obtained from Environment Canada, see Appendix B: Short Duration Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data. Using these rainfall intensities, rainfall hyetographs were developed for each return period with an SCS Type II 24 hour distribution. The design storm events include: • 2-year return period/ 24-hour duration: 41.5 mm • 5-year return period/ 24-hour duration: 54.3 mm • 100-year return period/ 24-hour duration: 89.4 mm Note, SCS 6-hour distributions were also analysed and those results are available for review upon request. The SCS 24-hour distribution was the most conservative and appropriate distribution given the catchment characteristics. An additional “Water Quality” design storm was used in this study, defined as a small, frequent storm representing 25mm of rainfall over a short duration. Based on long- term rainfall observations in Southern Ontario, 90-95 percent of all rainfall events have a total rainfall depth of 25mm or less. This rainfall amount over a 4-hour duration has an approximate 6 month return period in this region. 3.2.1.2

Hydrology

In order to reflect the unique hydrologic properties within each sub-catchment, a variety of surface cover types were defined. The surface cover types used in this study are described as follows: • Forest: Forest/meadow, heavy vegetation with high transpiration rates and a deep root zone. • Grass: Grass/turf, light vegetation, cultivated or landscaped areas with a shallow root zone. • BioRet: Bioretention, rain garden, or planter with engineered soil/media and underdrain system. This can be used to represent LID source control facilities. • Bare: Un-vegetated soil, loose granular materials, or legacy compacted fill • GrnRoof:Building structures with vegetated roof. This can be used to represent LID source control facilities. • RegRoof: Building structures with regular rooftop construction and materials. • PrmPave: Permeable paved surfaces with underdrain system. This can be used to represent LID source control facilities. • ImpPave: Regular impermeable paved surfaces with underdrain system. (i.e. roadways, parking, driveways). • Gravel: Gravel and compacted granular in traffic areas • Wetland: Hydrologic parameters reflect an area that is roughly half open water and half heavily vegetated. • Water: Open water surface, including Stormwater Management Facility detention facilities. For existing and proposed conditions, surface cover types were interpreted using available mapping and aerial imagery of the subject site. Characteristic hydrologic properties were assigned to each surface cover type as shown in Appendix B Table 3-1: Surface Cover Parameter Calculations based on literature values and similar studies throughout North America. Infiltration parameters were determined for the Green-Ampt method based on soil texture properties. For this development the sandy clay loam characteristics were used, which are values taken from the Handbook of Hydrology (D.R. Maidment et al.., 1993). Infiltration parameters include: • Capillary tension, a measure of how tightly water is held within the soil pore space; • Saturated hydraulic conductivity, a measure of how quickly the water can be drained vertically; and • Porosity (or initial soil water deficit), the volumetric fraction of water within the soil pore space under initially dry conditions.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 259 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

The parameters for silty clay loam are shown in Table 3-2. Table 3-2 Infiltration Parameters Capillary Tension

Texture Silty Clay Loam

Saturated Hydr. Conductivity

Porosity

in/hr

mm/hr

cm/s

wet clim.

dry clim.

10.75

273

0.08

5.56E-05

0.105

0.263

Based on the drainage characteristics of the soil onsite, there is moderate opportunity for infiltration. 3.2.1.3

Pre-Development Flows

Based on Table 3-1 in Appendix B and the existing catchment conditions in Table 3-3, pre-development flows were calculated for the existing development. Sub-Basin Routing is identified below.

Table 3-3 Existing Conditions Sunbury Development (Pre-Development) Hydrologic Units - Existing Conditions Description

% Impervious

Area (ha)

Length (m)

Average Width (m)

Grade (%)

External – Roadside Ditches

39.3%

2.87

516.0

170.0

1.4%

External – Sheet flow to Channel

33.2%

33.24

735.0

500.0

2.6%

Site – Sheet flow to Low Lying Area

7.3%

13.85

697.0

196.0

2.2%

WTLD

Site – Outlet to downstream Channel

32.9%

2.53

75.0

175.0

0.7%

Site – Sheet flow to Wetland

3.6%

12.97

242.0

400.0

6.4%

External – Sheet flow to E1

3.6%

2.51

170.0

175.0

4.1%

Site and External – Sheet Flow to Roadside Ditch

6.1%

4.03

283.0

200.0

4.4%

Within Limit of Development Area (ha):

31.66

Exterior to Limit of Development Area (ha):

40.34

Total Study Area (ha):

72.00

Hydrologic Unit Outlet 1

Outlet 2

Outlet 3 E3

Results shown in Table 3-4 quantify the pre-development peak rate of surface runoff that has been routed through the collection system, ultimately discharging to the various outlets downstream. Results are grouped by outfall location for all the rainfall events. Table 3-4 Peak Flows in Pre-Development Conditions Peak Flows in Pre-Development Conditions (cms) 25mm- Storm

1:2 Year Storm

1:5 Year Storm

1:100 Year Storm

SCS II-4hr

SCS II-24hr

0.17

0.19

0.41

1.40

18.01

0.03

0.07

0.41

4.03

0.02

0.03

0.11

0.44

Outlet

Area (ha)

Outlet 1

49.96

Outlet 2 Outlet 3

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 260 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

3.2.1.4

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Post Development Flows

The development of this site will increase the imperviousness of the site and hence the runoff. Based on Table 3-1 in Appendix B and the proposed catchment conditions in Table 3-5, post development flows were calculated for the proposed development. Sub-Basin Routing is identified below. Table 3-5 Proposed Conditions Sunbury Development (Post Development) Hydrologic Units - Post Development Conditions Hydrologic Unit

Description

% Impervious

Area (ha)

Length (m)

Average Width (m)

Grade (%)

P100

External – Roadside Ditches

P101 P102 Outlet 2 WTLD P200 P201 Outlet 3 P300

Site – Roadside Ditches External – Sheet flow to Channel

39.3%

3.40

516.0

170.0

1.4%

13.1% 4.0%

14.59 33.67

800.0 735.0

192.0 500.0

1.6% 2.6%

Site – Outlet to downstream Channel Site – Roadside Ditches External – Sheet flow to side yard lot lines

32.9% 13.1% 3.6%

2.53 13.05 2.51

75 920 170

175.0 400.0 175.0

0.7% 1.9% 4.1%

195

160.0

3.6%

Outlet 1

External 8.4% Within Limit of Development Area (ha): Exterior to Limit of Development Area (ha):

2.25 31.66 40.34

ha ha

Total Study Area (ha):

72.00

Results shown in Table 3-6 quantify the peak rate of surface runoff that has been routed through the collection system, ultimately discharging to the various outlets downstream. Results are grouped by outfall location for all the rainfall events. Table 3-6 Uncontrolled Peak Flows in Post Development Conditions Uncontrolled Peak Flows in the Post-Development Conditions (cms) 25mm- Storm

1:2 Year Storm

1:5 Year Storm

1:100 Year Storm

SCS II-4hr

SCS II-24hr

0.41

0.33

0.63

2.04

18.01

0.03

0.13

0.61

4.03

0.01

0.02

0.06

0.26

Outlet

Area (ha)

Outlet 1

49.96

Outlet 2 Outlet 3

Conveyance controls and enhanced swales are proposed to limit post developments flows shown in Table 3-6 to predevelopment levels in Table 3-4 for the major catchment areas. Note, post development Outlet 3 runoff decreases as the majority of the pre-development area is being redirected to Outlet 1. Results shown in Table 3-7 quantify the quantity control volumes required to limit post development flows to predevelopment levels.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 261 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Table 3-7 Comparison of Uncontrolled and Controlled Peak Flows in Post Development Storage Calculation Summary 1:2 Year Storm Post Controlled (cms)

Outlet 1 Outlet 2

Outlet

1:5 Year Storm

Storage (cm)

Post Controlled (cms)

0.19

140

0.03

1:100 Year Storm

Storage (cm)

Post Controlled (cms)

Storage (cm)

0.31

247

1.40

966

0.08

320

0.40

657

Refer to Appendix B for the 2 year, 5 year and 100 year design event storage calculations. Storage volumes in table 3-7 are the minimum required storage. As noted above, storage for Outlet 3 is not required as runoff has been redirected to Outlet 1 and the storage volume attributed to Outlet 1 is increased accordingly. Outlet 2 storage is to be provided by a system of check dams each with 90mm subdrain installed at the invert of the check dam. The north enhanced swale is to be 2.5m flat bottom, 0.9m in height at the channel inlet and 1.2m in height at the outlet. Outlet 1 storage is to be provided by a system of check dams with 75mm subdrain installed at the invert of the channel. Six check dams are to be provided upstream on the north side and six check dams upstream on the south side along the roadside ditch. As noted above, the 500mm culvert crossing Sunbury Road at Outlet 1 is sized for the minor event. It Is expected that it surcharges during the major storm event. The low lying area directly to the west of the culvert provides storage for flooding during the major storm events. This area is to be maintained as is, and it is recommended that a drainage easement be provided to the Township. The high water line for the low lying area is approximately 124.29m. No quantity control is expected to be required at downstream outlets, since post development peak flows will be maintained at or below pre-development levels. The intermittent channel at the south end of the site is to be realigned onsite along the proposed property lines. Channels are to be trapezoidal shaped, grass lines and flat bottom with rock flow check dams and straw bale check dams at grade changes for sediment control. Roads and major drainage channels and the associated centreline culverts are to be designed for the 100 year design storm event and are to be protected at the inlet and outlet with rip rap. Culverts sizes can be determined during final detailed design. It is recommended that culverts be a minimum of 400mm in diameter. Local roadside ditches are to be designed using the Rational Method and convey the 100 year storm event. It is recommended that roadside ditches provide 0.3m of freeboard. Driveway culverts are to be designed and sized for the 5 year storm event. Refer to Appendix A, Figure 3 for roadside ditch calculations. Increased algae blooms from the proposed development will not be an issue. The site was previously utilized for agriculture and the change of use to residential will lower any pesticide or fertilizer use. The design of the site has been undertaken with the objective to minimize impact on area resources. The design of grading, drainage, and landscaping works will be finalized during the detailed design / approval process.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 262 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

100 year event modeling for the pre-development and post-development are included in Appendix B.

3.3

Water Quality

The Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual by the MOE describes various levels of protection of water quality, based on a general relationship between the end-of-pipe stormwater management facilities long-term suspended solids removal and the lethal and chronic effects of suspended solids on aquatic life. Stormwater management measures will be implemented to provide in excess of 80% long term removal of suspended solids. A 13.1% impervious level has been used for sizing enhanced swales for quality control. The approximate impervious area onsite is estimated conservatively at 12.2%, refer to Appendix B: Pervious / Impervious Area Calculations. Refer to Table 3-1 in the appendix for impervious area modeling details.

3.3.1 Enhanced Swales The site drains to three separate outlets, due to the topography onsite a centralized facility is not the preferred stormwater management control as an alternative we propose a low impact development alternative; including enhanced grass swales and filter strips. Proposed enhanced swales would be integrated into the municipal right-of-way road section where possible and specified rear yard swales. Several rear yard property lines will include enhanced swales to provide quantity control. Covenants should be included on the lots requiring the residents to maintain the swales. Enhanced grass swales are a low-impact-development type stormwater management control. The Ministry of Environment (MECP) Stormwater Design Manual, Toronto and Region Conservation- Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website have been used as our terms of reference. Unlike the general MOE manual approach which proposes volume recommendations for quality control and a minimum 24 hour drawdown time, enhanced swales are flow rate based and are to be designed to certain flow criteria and not actually retain a specific volume. Enhanced swales treat flows through vegetation slowing the water to allow sedimentation, filtering through a subsoil matrix, and/or infiltration into the underlying soils. Rock check dams and sub-surface drainage have been included in the design to help promote the treatment quality. Stormwater runoff onsite will be directed to 0.75m wide flat bottom roadside ditches. Regular 0.3m high weir rock check dams are proposed at 60 metre intervals where the ditch grade is 0.5%, 30 metre intervals where the ditch grade is 1.0%, and 15 metres where the ditch grade is 2.0%. Rock check dams are to be sized to reduce peak flow velocities to 0.5 m/s during the 25mm storm event. Refer to Appendix A, Proposed Road Cross-section for further details. Using regular 0.3m high by 0.75m wide weir rock check dams and including for headwater over the check dam, the peak velocity is to be limited to 0.5m/s for the post-development 25mm-4 hour storm event for the north portion. Regular 0.3m high by 1.65m wide weir check dams are to be provided for in the south portion of the site. No direct quality control is proposed for drainage areas external to the development. Pollutant removal is in excess of 80% of suspended solids is anticipated. The EPA estimates the following removal rates for various pollutants:

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 263 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Total Suspended Solids: 81% Total Phosphorous: 29% Nitrate Nitrogen: 38% Metals: 14% to 55% Bacteria: 50% The following criteria was utilized in the channel design: The enhanced grass swales include the following features: • Flow velocities below 0.5 m/s • Flow depth of 150 mm under peak flow condition for a 25mm-4hr design storm • 0.75m wide flat bottom ditch • 0.75m maximum HWL • The interior side slopes of the enhanced swale are 3:1 (H:V). • 0.3m of Free Board has been provided for the banks. • Slopes of less than 2.0% • 0.3m high rock check dams for additional retention • Grass shall be maintained at a minimum height of 100 mm. • Enhanced swales will be constructed concurrently with initial phases of development. • The subdivision agreement will include provisions for installation and maintenance of the proposed works until Final approval is granted. • Homeowners will be responsible for maintaining the proposed rear yard works after final approval of the works. • Native grass species are specified.

3.4

Maintenance

Enhanced grass swales require periodic maintenance, access to the enhanced swales are provided via the proposed rear yards. Periodic maintenance inspection of the facilities should be undertaken. The inspection should provide a summary of the following items: • Observations resulting from the inspection of the facility over the course of the year. These observations should include comments on the: o hydraulic operation of the facilities (detention time, evidence or occurrence of overflows) o condition of vegetation in and around facility o occurrence of obstructions at the inlet and outlet o evidence of spills and oil/grease contamination o frequency of trash build-up o Measured sediment depths in the facilities; o Maintenance and operational control undertaken during the year; o Recommendations for inspection and maintenance program for the coming year. The enhanced grass swale will require routine periodic maintenance including weed control, grass cutting and trash removal several times per year. Removal of accumulated sediment, and replacement of the rock check dams will be required when clogging occurs. The grass should be maintained at minimum height of 100 mm to promote quality control. Removal of sediment should be completed on an annual basis. The lifespan of the sub-drain largely depends on the efficiency of the annual maintenance and should be replaced when the homeowners notice ponding on a regular basis in the facility after the annual sediment removal has taken place.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 264 of 320

AGENDA ITEM # FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

2628100 Ontario Inc.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report

Quality Control (Short Term)

Erosion and sediment control plans will be included during the detailed design submission. Silt fencing is to be provided at all side slopes and down gradient locations to ensure sediment and erosion control during construction. Other control devices such as straw bales will also be provided where drainage is concentrated. Sediment and erosion management measures also serve to provide a limit to the grading operations. The timeframe for land to remain exposed before it is stabilized with sod, mulch, or hydroseeding is to be minimized. Topsoil is to be stockpiled away from watercourses and wetlands. Rock check dams or straw bale filters are to be provided in overland swale and ditch systems. Inspection of the sediment control works should be undertaken before and after all rainfall (and snowmelt) events. Maintenance is to be undertaken as required to ensure the proper operation of all sediment and erosion controls. Inspection and maintenance is the developer’s responsibility until such time as the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works is issued.

Conclusions

It is recommended that the development proceed with the mitigation measures detailed in this report to address storm water quality, storm water quantity, and erosion concerns on the site. Stormwater runoff within the Sunbury Subdivision should be directed to the enhanced swale type facilities. Detailed design of enhanced roadside ditches, enhanced rear yard swales, intermittent channel realignment, culvert crossings and outfalls will be provided during the final engineering design of the subdivision.

Ff-Rpt-2019-11-26-Sunbury Swm Report

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 265 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Appendix A Draft Plan Figure 2 – Existing Catchments Plan Figure 3 – Proposed Minor Catchments Plan Figure 4 – Proposed Major Catchments Plan Typical Road Cross Section

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 266 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

249.05 209.97

8.89

6.0m

WETLAND AREA

1.04 ha

161.03

216.87

1.13 ha

20 76.00

STREET A 76.02

1.76 ha

2.40 ha

68.35

81.86

0.1

76.00

.99

0.80 ha

111.03

143.55

164.51

161.33

1.03 ha

1 .3

1.25 ha

95.67

0.61 ha

62.90

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

1.27 ha

0 9. 11

164.94

76.02

0.62 ha 237.23

20.0m

76.00

AGRICULTURAL LANDS

30m SETBACK

.0m

1.00 ha

140.75

134.93

200 .63

149.99

6.0m

112.01

0.60 ha

0.61 ha 92.21

0.61 ha

25 0.61 ha 0

50m

250m

99.20

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

68.23 58.79

METRIC

0.61 ha

DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY 0.3048

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

98.68

59.04 BLOCK 33

74.05 123.77

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

24 6.0m

74.05

10 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

68.11

64.90

100.07

84.67

99.98

80.17

87.67 100.07

5.02

A=52.82

32.32

59.64

NEIGHBOUR LOT ADDITION

96.42

48.67

PUBLIC LIBRARY

105.22

69.28

63.6

0.60 ha

BLOCK 32

0.62 ha

71.22 6.0m

92.05

264.14

0.61 ha

68.66

75.95

27 0.60 ha

86.92

EXISTING BUILDING

87.51

6 68.83

69.08

0.61 ha

280.24

91.57

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7P 2X8 T:613.634.9009 F:888.884.9392

90.39 3.0m

66.62

0.60 ha

0.62 ha

3.0m

66.53 3.0m

3.0m

29 3.0m

3.0m

90.37

88.95 68.80 3.0m

66.86

STREET A

89.05

0.60 ha

30 6.0m

279.38

6.0m WIDE PARK BLOCK

138.51

0.61 ha

20.0m 91.78

92.75

31 0.68 ha

5 47.5

92.87

2 0.81 ha .9

110.86

92.75 AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

GERALD BALL MEMORIAL PARK

64.67

AGRICULTURAL LANDS ZONED RESIDENTIAL

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

181.14

3.41 ha NT

NAG

E EAS

33.25

AI DR

URBAN COMMERCIAL

38.48

33.93

10.00

0.61 ha

75.27

65.72

8 10

URBAN COMMERCIAL 42.67

54.50

URBAN RESIDENTIAL

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 267 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

RANDY CLARK RD

WETLAN

120.0

2.53ha

OUTLET #2

.0 122

122.0 124.0

0 125.0 127.0 129.0 130.0 131.0 132.0 133.0

131.0

135.0

132.0 133.0 134.0

136.0

135.0

137.0

136.0 .0 137

13 6 13 .0 5. 0

139.0

13 4.0

139 .0

1 13 38.0 7. 0

4.03ha

0 3.

0 1. 13 130.0 29.0 1

14 3.

131.0

.0 42

1 141.0

133

132.0

OUTLET #3

8.0 12 .0 129 .0 0 13 .0 131 0 2. 13 .0 133

6.1%

142

122.0

130.0

2.51ha EXTERNAL

121.0

.0 126 .0 127 0 128. 0 129.

12 1.0

3.6%

EXISTING CULVERT

121.0

12.97ha 3.6%

32.9 WTLD

134.0 0 133.

140.0

139

2.87ha EXTERNAL 132.0

.0 138 6.0 13 0 . 134 .0 132

39.3%

133.0

129.0

128.0

129.0

131.0

127.0

7.0

130.0 129 .0

13.85ha

131.0

7.3%

E6 127.0

33.24ha EXTERNAL 4.0%

EXISTING 600mmØ CULVERT 126.0

5.0 12

6.0 12

5.0

7.0

126 .0

6.0

128

128.0

7.0

5.0

OUTLET #1

126.0

Y RD SUNBUR

132.0

0 5. .0 124

128.0

129.0

130

0 6. 12

0.0

7.0

6.0 12 0 131.

124

BATTERSEA RD

5 12

12 8

12 6.0

130.0 13 1.0

EXISTING 500mmØ CULVERT INV. EAST = 122.76m INV. WEST = 123.20m 4.0

127.0

12 9. 0

132

127.0

126.0

MORELAND DIXON RD

m H=1:2000 Project

SUNBURY SUBDIVISION AREA IN HECTARES Drawing

PRE-DEVELOPMENT CATCHMENT AREAS

#.## ha

31.66 ha SITE AREA 72.00 ha TOTAL CATCHMENTS AREA

#.## % IMPERVIOUS

CATCHMENT ID

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8 613.634.9009 tel. 1.888.884.9392 fax.

Drawn by:

Checked by:

KMN

Approved by:

Project No.

Drawing No.

KMN

Client No.

Revision/Issue

Date

MAJOR FLOW PATH

2628100 ONTARIO INC.

Date:

NOVEMBER 2019 Scale:

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

1:2000 (ANSI D)

FIG.2

Page 268 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

0.7m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

0.6m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

RANDY CLARK RD

203 D

WETLAN

3.58ha 2.53ha

120.0

0.30

OUTLET #2

0.90 WTLD

EXISTING CULVERT

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM 121.0

122.0 124.0

.0 126 .0 127 0 128. 0 129.

201 200

121.0

122.0

0 125.0 127.0 129.0 130.0 131.0 132.0 133.0

13 1.2

130.0

5.93ha

131.0

132.0 133.0 134.0

136.0 .0 137

2.51ha EXTERNAL

139.0

0.25

142

13 6 13 .0 5. 0

137.5

136.0

137.0

136.2

135.0

1.30ha

139

13 4.0

1 13 38.0 7. 0

137.2

135.0

0.35

. 33

13 2. 0

0.35

122.0

9.2

121.8 1

0.30

122.1

202

121.0

204

0.50

2.85ha

123.6

22.0

BA TT ER SE A

0.69ha

130.0 129.

301

300 0 3. 14

2.50ha EXTERNAL

0.95ha EXTERNAL

0.25 P10B

0.35

131.0

2.0 14 141.0

OUTLET #3

8.0 12 PROPOSED 400mmØ CULVERT .0 129.0 0 13 .0 131 0 2. 13 .0 133

130.6

134.4

133 1 .0 32.0

HP 132.2

140.0

134.0 .0 133

134.2

0.53ha EXTERNAL

139

0.35

.0 138 6.0 13 0 . 134 .0 132

2.87ha EXTERNAL

5.66ha

0.55

133.0

0.35

132.0

100

129.0

131.0

128.0

128.7

9.0

0.89ha 12

131.0

0.50 128. P8

127.0

130.0 129 .0

7.0 12 0.3m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

127.0

127.2

103

0.4m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

0.61ha 24.73ha EXTERNAL

3.43ha

0.25 P10A

0.35

EXISTING 600mmØ CULVERT

126.6

126.0

125.8

0 7.

7.0

5.0

102

12 6

125.9

6.0

105

101

PROPOSED CULVERT

102 REALIGN CHANNEL INV. 125.5

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM .0 125

126 .

101

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM .0

128

0.3m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

12 5

128.0

7.0

125.0

126.0

0.25

OUTLET #1

126.4

2.77ha EXTERNAL

12 9.

0.4m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

P11

0 5. 12 24.0 1

29 4.

0.25

5 12

P14

6.0

E AG T AIN DR EMEN EAS

128.0

7.0

129.0

130 .0

4.00ha 0.35

124

BATTERSEA RD

3.67ha EXTERNAL

12 8.0

6.0

12 4.0

127.0 132.0

EXISTING 500mmØ CULVERT INV. EAST = 122.76m INV. WEST = 123.20m

104

130.0 13 1.0

Y RD SUNBUR

0.0

P13

. 132

127.0

126.0

MORELAND DIXON RD

m H=1:2000 Project

SUNBURY SUBDIVISION AREA IN HECTARES 31.66 ha SITE AREA

Drawing

QUALITY CONTROL PROVIDED BY LOT REAR YARD ENHANCED SWALE / FRONT YARD FILTER STRIP QUALITY CONTROL PROVIDED BY ROADSIDE ENHANCED DITCH No.

Revision/Issue

POST DEVELOPMENT MINOR CATCHMENT AREAS

#.## ha

72.00 ha TOTAL CATCHMENTS AREA

#.## COEFFICIENT

CATCHMENT ID

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Checked by:

KMN

PROPOSED SWALE / ROADSIDE DITCH

Approved by:

Project No.

Drawing No.

KMN

Client

2628100 ONTARIO INC. 200 SECTION ID

Drawn by:

MAJOR FLOW PATH

Date

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8 613.634.9009 tel. 1.888.884.9392 fax.

Date:

NOVEMBER 2019 Scale:

1:2000 (ANSI D)

FIG.3

Page 269 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

0.7m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

0.6m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

RANDY CLARK RD

WETLAN

120.0

2.53ha

OUTLET #2

32.9% WTLD

EXISTING CULVERT

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM 121.0

122.0 124.0

121.0

9.2

0 125.0 127.0 129.0 130.0 131.0 132.0 133.0

13 1.2

130.0

13.1% P200 131.0

135.0

132.0 133.0 134.0

136.0 .0 137

HP 137.5

13 4.0

13 2. 0

139

3.6% P201

1 13 38.0 7. 0

137.2

142

13 6 13 .0 5. 0

139.0

136.0

137.0

136.2

135.0

2.51ha EXTERNAL

122.0

13.05ha

122.0

.0 126 .0 127 0 128. 0 129.

122.1

123.6

121.8 1

121.0

BA TT ER SE A

22.0

130.0 129.

12 130.6

134.4

2.25ha OUTLET 3 8.4% P300 131.0

2.0 14 141.0

133 1 .0 32.0

HP 132.2

140.0

OUTLET #3

8.0 12 PROPOSED 400mmØ CULVERT .0 129.0 0 13 .0 131 0 2. 13 .0 133

134.0 .0 133

134.2

139

132.0 133.0

3.40ha EXTERNAL

131.0

39.3% P100

129.0

.0 138 6.0 13 0 . 134 .0 132

128.7

129.0

128.0

131.0

0 128.

127.0

130.0 129 .0

7.0 12 0.3m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

127.0

127.2

0.4m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

14.59ha 13.1% P101

33.67ha EXTERNAL

EXISTING 600mmØ CULVERT 126.6

4.0% P102

126.0

6.0

125.8

7.0

5.0

125.9

PROPOSED CULVERT

REALIGN CHANNEL INV. 125.5

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM .0 125

126 .

12 6

0.5m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM .0

128

0.3m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

12 5

128.0

7.0

0.4m HIGH ROCK CHECK DAM

OUTLET #1

126.0

125.0

126.4

12 9.

EXISTING 500mmØ CULVERT INV. EAST = 122.76m INV. WEST = 123.20m

132.0

0 5. 12 24.0 1

29 4.

.0 6.0

E AG T AIN DR EMEN EAS

128.0

0.0

7.0

129.0

130 .0

124

BATTERSEA RD

5 12

12 8.0

6.0

12 4.0

127.0

130.0 13 1.0

Y RD SUNBUR

. 132

127.0

126.0

MORELAND DIXON RD

m H=1:2000 Project

SUNBURY SUBDIVISION AREA IN HECTARES 31.66 ha SITE AREA

Drawing

POST DEVELOPMENT MAJOR CATCHMENT AREAS

#.## ha

72.00 ha TOTAL CATCHMENTS AREA

#.## COEFFICIENT

CATCHMENT ID

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8 613.634.9009 tel. 1.888.884.9392 fax.

Drawn by:

Checked by:

KMN

JH No.

Revision/Issue

Date

MAJOR FLOW PATH

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Drawing No.

KMN

Client

2628100 ONTARIO INC. PROPOSED SWALE / ROADSIDE DITCH

Approved by:

Project No.

Date:

SEPTEMBER 2019 Scale:

1:2000 (ANSI D)

FIG.4

Page 270 of 320

DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE

Page 271 of 320 SHOULDER 6.50 3.50

VM AX

ENHANCED SWALE 0.15 MIN.

0.75m - 0.90M

AGENDA ITEM #

PROPOSED RURAL 20m RIGHT OF WAY N.T.S.

TREE 0.50 9.50 0.00 10.00

℄

PROPERTY LINE

3H:1

1.50 8.50

EDGE OF TRENCH/ COMM. PEDESTAL

7.35 ENHANCED SWALE ℄

ENHANCED SWALE

5.00 5.00

3.0%

5.50 4.50

3.0%

ROUNDING

2.0%

SHOULDER

H:1V

2.0%

6.50 3.50

6.0%

EDGE OF PAGEMENT

ROAD

CENTRELINE OF R.O.W. 10.00 0.00

EDGE OF PAGEMENT

0.15 MIN.

ROUNDING

4.50 5.50

0.75

5.00 5.00 5.50 4.50

STREET LIGHTS

UTILITY TRENCH

7.35

3H:1

ENHANCED SWALE ℄

EDGE OF TRENCH/ 1.50 8.50 COMM. PEDESTAL

TREE

0.50 9.50 TRANS. PED. 1.00 9.00

0.00 10.00

DISTANCE FROM CENTRE LINE OF R.O.W.

PROPERTY LINE

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

⅊ 20.0m

⅊

40mm HL3 40mm MDB 200mm GRANULAR ‘A’ 250mm GRANULAR ‘B’

6.0%

UTILITY TRENCH

3H:1 V

0.75

DISTANCE FROM CENTRE LINE OF R.O.W. DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE

AGENDA ITEM #

Appendix B Short Duration Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data Grain Size Distribution Analysis Table 3-1: Surface Cover Parameter Calculations Pervious / Impervious Area Calculations 100-Year Event Pre-Development Modeling 100-Year Event Uncontrolled Post Development Modeling

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 272 of 320

2014/12/21

Données sur I’intensité, la durée et la fréquence des chutes de pluie de courte durée 600 500

Caution/Sujet à caution : Average 95% Confidence Interval > ±25% KINGSTON A Intervalle de confiance moyen 95% > ±25%ON

400 300

6104146

95% Confidence Interval > ±25% Intervalle de confiance de 95% > ±25%

200

Intensity(mm/h) / Intensité(mm/h)

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Short Duration Rainfall Intensity−Duration−Frequency Data

1982 − 2003 17 years / ans Latitude 44o 13’N Longitude 76o 36’W

100 90 80 70 60 50

Elevation / Altitude 92 m

40 30 20

10 9 8 7 6 5

Return Periods/ Périodes de retour Years / ans

3 2

Minutes

Duration/Durée

6 Hours/Heures

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 273 of 320

100 50 25 10 5

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 274 of 320

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Table 3-1: Surface Cover Parameter Calculations - Sunbury Development Manning’s “n”

Forest

Description Forest/meadow, heavy vegetation with high transpiration/deep root zone

Forest

0.03

0.4

1 Pervious

100

Grass

Grass/turf, light vegetation/landscaped areas with shallow roots

Grass

0.025

0.25

2.5 Pervious

BioRet

Bioretention/rain garden/planter, engineered with underdrain

BioRet

0.025

0.3

2.5 Pervious

Bare

Un-vegetated soil or loos granular materials

Bare

0.02

0.15

7.5

5 Pervious

GrnRoof

Green roof

GrnRoof

0.025

0.3

17.5

25 Pervious

RegRoof

Regular roof

Ex Bed Rock

0.025

0.2

7.5

90 Pervious

Ex Bed Rock Exposed bedrock

RegRoof

0.015

0.15

2.5

95 Pervious

PrmPave

Permeable paved surfaces (with underdrain)

PrmPave

0.02

0.2

12.5

50 Pervious

ImpPave

Impermeable paved surfaces (i.e. roadways, parking, driveways)

ImpPave

0.015

0.15

2.5

95 Pervious

Gravel

Gravel and compacted granular in traffic areas

Gravel

0.025

0.2

7.5

90 Pervious

Wetland

Roughly half open water and half heavily vegetated

Wetland

0.015

0.35

50 Pervious

Water

Open water surface

Water

0.015

100 Pervious

Surface Cover Type

Impervious

Dep. Storage (mm)

Pervious

Impervious

% Impervious

Pervious

Subarea Routing

% Routed

% Impervious without Storage

Code

Manning’s “N”

Percent by Surface Cover Type Hydrologic Unit Name Forest

% Impervious Grass

BioRet

Bare

GrnRoof

WTLD

35.00%

10.00%

40.00%

50.00%

10.00%

40.00%

50.00%

10.00%

48.00%

39.00%

Gravel

Wetland

Water

Impervious

Pervious

Total

% Impervious without Storage

% Routed

100.00%

32.9

0.02025

0.3675

3.5

10.00

100.00%

3.6

0.023

0.215

5.5

9.25

10.00

100.00%

3.6

0.023

0.215

5.5

9.25

10.00

1.00%

100.00%

6.1

0.02335

0.2235

5.45

9.4

10.35

60.00%

3.00%

32.00%

5.00%

100.00%

39.3

0.0215

0.2125

4.125

8.125

14.15

1.00%

43.00%

14.00%

66.50%

10.00%

P300

10.00%

60.00%

24.00%

WTLD

35.00%

2.00%

1.00%

100.00%

4.0

0.0275

0.3305

7.625

12.675

10.25

0.30%

0.20%

9.00%

100.00%

7.3

0.02427

0.2696

5.2425

10.88

10.05

2.00%

2.00% 65.00%

88.50% 10.00%

ImpPave

Pervious

1.00%

54.00%

P201

PrmPave

65.00%

P200

Ex Bed Rock RegRoof

Impervious

Dep. Storage (mm)

40.00%

4.00%

5.90%

1.60%

50.00%

100.00%

8.4

0.0239

0.236

5.4

9.65

10.70

100.00%

32.9

0.02025

0.3675

3.5

10.00

100.00%

13.1

0.02401

0.2393

4.7525

9.465

11.35

100.00%

3.6

0.023

0.215

5.5

9.25

10.00

P100

60.00%

3.00%

32.00%

5.00%

100.00%

39.3

0.0215

0.2125

4.125

8.125

14.15

P101

88.50%

4.00%

5.90%

1.60%

100.00%

13.1

0.02401

0.2393

4.7525

9.465

11.35

43.00%

1.00%

100.00%

4.0

0.0275

0.3305

7.625

12.675

10.25

P102

54.00%

1.00%

Subarea Routing

Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious Impervious to Pervious

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 275 of 320

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE

IMPERVIOUS AREA

LOT 28 AREA = 0.61ha

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE

DRIVEWAY

500 SQ.FT GARAGE

LOT 5 AREA = 0.60ha

LOT 29 AREA = 0.62ha DRIVEWAY

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE 500 SQ.FT GARAGE

500 SQ.FT GARAGE

Benchmark

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

PERMEABLE AREA

DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED ROW

500 SQ.FT GARAGE

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE

LOT 4 AREA = 0.60ha

Date

Revision/Issue

No.

LOT 30 AREA = 0.61ha

3,000 SQ.FT HOUSE 500 SQ.FT GARAGE

Client

2628100 ONTARIO INC. Project

SUNBURY SUBDIVISION Drawing

PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION Drawn by:

Checked by:

KMN

Approved by:

KMN

Date:

OCTOBER 2019 Scale:

1:1000

Project No.

Drawing No.

SK1

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 276 of 320

DRIVEWAY

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210 Kingston, ON, Canada K7P 0L8 613.634.9009 tel. 1.866.884.9392 fax.

AGENDA ITEM #

Autodesk® Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2016 - Version 13.0.94 (Build 0) —————————————————————————————-******************* Project Description

File Name …………….. Sunbury Pre.SPF

Analysis Options

Flow Units ……………. cms Subbasin Hydrograph Method. EPA SWMM Infiltration Method ……. Green-Ampt Link Routing Method ……. Hydrodynamic Storage Node Exfiltration.. None Starting Date …………. NOV-01-2019 00:00:00 Ending Date …………… NOV-02-2019 00:00:00 Antecedent Dry Days ……. 0.0 Report Time Step ………. 00:15:00 Wet Time Step …………. 00:15:00 Dry Time Step …………. 00:15:00 Routing Time Step ……… 30.00 sec

Element Count

Number of rain gages …… 1 Number of subbasins ……. 7 Number of nodes ……….. 4 Number of links ……….. 1 Number of pollutants …… 0 Number of land uses ……. 0

Raingage Summary

Gage ID

Data Source

Data Type

Recording Interval min

———————————————————–EC 100 yr 24 CUMULATIVE 15.00

Subbasin Summary

Subbasin

Total Equiv. Imperv. Average Raingage Area Width Area Slope ID hectares m % % ———————————————————————–E1 12.97 242.00 3.60 6.4000 EC E2 2.51 179.00 3.60 3.9000 EC E3 4.03 283.00 6.10 4.4000 EC E4 2.87 516.00 39.30 1.6000 EC E5 33.24 735.00 4.00 2.6000 EC E6 13.85 697.00 7.30 2.1500 EC WTLD 2.53 75.00 32.90 0.7000 EC

Node Summary

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 277 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Node ID

Element Type

Invert Maximum Ponded External Elevation Elev. Area Inflow m m m² —————————————————————————–OUTLET1_OUT JUNCTION 123.20 123.70 0.000 500CULVERT_OUT OUTFALL 122.76 123.26 0.000 OUTLET2 OUTFALL 119.50 119.50 0.000 OUTLET3 OUTFALL 128.15 128.15 0.000

Link Summary

Link From Node To Node Element Length Slope Manning’s ID Type m % Roughness ——————————————————————————————-500CULVERT OUTLET1_OUT 500CULVERT_OUT CONDUIT 22.0 2.0000 0.0150

Cross Section Summary

Link Shape Design ID Flow

Depth/

Width

Diameter

No. of

Cross

Full Flow

Barrels

Sectional

Hydraulic

Area

Radius

m²

Capacity m

cms ——————————————————————————————————–500CULVERT CIRCULAR 0.50 0.50 1 0.20 0.12 0.46

Runoff Quantity Continuity

Total Precipitation …… Evaporation Loss ……… Infiltration Loss …….. Surface Runoff ……….. Final Surface Storage …. Continuity Error (%) …..

Volume hectare-m ——–6.437 0.000 4.421 1.774 0.278 -0.550

Depth mm ——89.400 0.000 61.397 24.633 3.862

Flow Routing Continuity

Dry Weather Inflow ……. Wet Weather Inflow ……. Groundwater Inflow ……. RDII Inflow ………….. External Inflow ………. External Outflow ……… Surface Flooding ……… Evaporation Loss ……… Initial Stored Volume …. Final Stored Volume …… Continuity Error (%) …..

Volume hectare-m ——–0.000 1.773 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.744 0.029 0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.020

Volume Mliters ——–0.000 17.729 0.000 0.000 0.000 17.445 0.290 0.000 0.002 0.000

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 278 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

EPA SWMM Time of Concentration Computations Report

Tc = (0.94 * (L^0.6) * (n^0.6)) / ((i^0.4) * (S^0.3)) Where: Tc = Time of Concentration (min) L = Flow Length (ft) n = Manning’s Roughness i = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) S = Slope (ft/ft) ————-Subbasin E1 ————-Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

535.95 0.21500 0.02300 3.72500 3.72500 6.40000 163.01

————-Subbasin E2 ————-Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

140.22 0.21500 0.02300 3.72500 3.72500 3.90000 84.62

————-Subbasin E3 ————-Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

142.40 0.22350 0.02335 3.72500 3.72500 4.40000 83.48

————-Subbasin E4 ————-Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

55.62 0.21250 0.02150 3.72500 3.72500 1.60000 48.51

————-Subbasin E5

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 279 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

452.25 0.33050 0.02750 3.72500 3.72500 2.60000 243.20

————-Subbasin E6 ————-Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

198.71 0.26960 0.02427 3.72500 3.72500 2.15000 140.69

—————Subbasin WTLD —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

337.33 0.36750 0.02025 3.72500 3.72500 0.70000 261.19

Subbasin Runoff Summary

——————————————————————————————————Subbasin Total Total Total Total Total Peak Runoff Time of ID Rainfall Runon Evap. Infil. Runoff Runoff Coefficient Concentration mm mm mm mm mm cms days hh:mm:ss ——————————————————————————————————E1 89.40 5.96 0.00 63.26 32.37 0.61 0.339 0 02:43:00 E2 89.40 0.00 0.00 59.54 30.81 0.27 0.345 0 01:24:37 E3 89.40 0.00 0.00 58.50 31.74 0.44 0.355 0 01:23:29 E4 89.40 0.00 0.00 40.34 48.88 0.56 0.547 0 00:48:30 E5 89.40 0.00 0.00 63.63 21.19 0.93 0.237 0 04:03:12 E6 89.40 50.83 0.00 62.39 73.12 1.01 0.521 0 02:20:41 WTLD 89.40 165.94 0.00 47.49 194.76 0.41 0.763 0 04:21:11

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 280 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Node Depth Summary

—————————————————————————————-Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained Volume Flooded m m m days hh:mm ha-mm minutes hh:mm:ss —————————————————————————————-OUTLET1_OUT 0.39 4.30 127.50 0 12:12 29.00 32 0:00:00 500CULVERT_OUT 0.20 0.50 123.26 0 12:05 0 0 0:00:00 OUTLET2 0.00 0.00 119.50 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 OUTLET3 0.00 0.00 128.15 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00

Node Flow Summary

———————————————————————————–Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak Inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cms cms days hh:mm cms days hh:mm ———————————————————————————–OUTLET1_OUT JUNCTION 1.394 1.394 0 12:15 0.27 0 12:15 500CULVERT_OUT OUTFALL 0.000 1.121 0 12:15 0.00 OUTLET2 OUTFALL 0.406 0.406 0 13:29 0.00 OUTLET3 OUTFALL 0.443 0.443 0 12:15 0.00

Outfall Loading Summary

———————————————-Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cms cms ———————————————-500CULVERT_OUT 99.42 0.209 1.121 OUTLET2 98.34 0.111 0.406 OUTLET3 93.42 0.013 0.443 ———————————————-System 97.06 0.333 1.676

Link Flow Summary

——————————————————————————————————————————Link ID Element Time of Maximum Length Peak Flow Design Ratio of Ratio of Total Reported Type Peak Flow Velocity Factor during Flow Maximum Maximum Time Condition Occurrence Attained Analysis Capacity /Design Flow Surcharged days hh:mm m/sec cms cms Flow Depth minutes

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 281 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

——————————————————————————————————————————500CULVERT CONDUIT 0 12:15 5.71 1.00 1.121 0.463 2.42 1.00 122 SURCHARGED

Flow Classification Summary

—————————————————————————— Fraction of Time in Flow Class —Avg. Avg. Up Down Sub Sup Up Down Froude Flow Link Dry Dry Dry Crit Crit Crit Crit Number Change —————————————————————————500CULVERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.78 0.00 0.00 1.34 0.0009

Time-Step Critical Elements

Link 500CULVERT (66.76%)

Highest Flow Instability Indexes

All links are stable.

Routing Time Step Summary

Minimum Time Step : Average Time Step : Maximum Time Step : Percent in Steady State : Average Iterations per Step :

2.44 sec 13.15 sec 30.00 sec 0.00 2.12

Analysis began on: Wed Nov 27 16:01:50 2019 Analysis ended on: Wed Nov 27 16:01:51 2019 Total elapsed time: 00:00:01

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 282 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Autodesk® Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2016 - Version 13.0.94 (Build 0) —————————————————————————————-******************* Project Description

File Name …………….. Sunbury Post.SPF

Analysis Options

Element Count

Number of rain gages …… 1 Number of subbasins ……. 7 Number of nodes ……….. 5 Number of links ……….. 2 Number of pollutants …… 0 Number of land uses ……. 0

Raingage Summary

Gage ID

Data Source

Data Type

Recording Interval min

———————————————————–EC 100 yr 24 CUMULATIVE 15.00

Subbasin Summary

Subbasin

Total Equiv. Imperv. Average Raingage Area Width Area Slope ID hectares m % % ———————————————————————–P100 3.40 500.00 39.30 0.5000 EC P101 14.59 800.00 13.10 1.6000 EC P102 33.67 735.00 4.00 2.6000 EC P200 13.05 920.00 13.10 1.9000 EC P201 2.51 170.00 3.60 4.1000 EC P300 2.25 195.00 8.40 3.6000 EC WTLD 2.53 75.00 32.90 0.7000 EC

Node Summary

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 283 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Node ID

Element Type

Invert Maximum Ponded External Elevation Elev. Area Inflow m m m² —————————————————————————–A1 JUNCTION 125.50 128.00 0.000 A2 JUNCTION 124.75 127.00 0.000 OUTLET1_OUT OUTFALL 123.20 123.80 0.000 OUTLET2 OUTFALL 119.40 119.40 0.000 OUTLET3 OUTFALL 128.15 128.15 0.000

Link Summary

Link From Node To Node Element Length Slope Manning’s ID Type m % Roughness ——————————————————————————————-Link-07 A1 A2 CHANNEL 200.0 0.3750 0.0320 Link-08 A2 OUTLET1_OUT CHANNEL 190.0 0.8684 0.0320

Cross Section Summary

Link Shape Design ID Flow

Depth/

Width

Diameter

No. of

Cross

Full Flow

Barrels

Sectional

Hydraulic

Area

Radius

m²

Capacity m

cms ——————————————————————————————————–Link-07 TRAPEZOIDAL 0.70 5.20 1 2.17 0.40 2.25 Link-08 TRAPEZOIDAL 0.60 4.35 1 1.53 0.34 2.16

Runoff Quantity Continuity

Total Precipitation …… Evaporation Loss ……… Infiltration Loss …….. Surface Runoff ……….. Final Surface Storage …. Continuity Error (%) …..

Volume hectare-m ——–6.437 0.000 4.263 1.968 0.245 -0.612

Depth mm ——89.400 0.000 59.205 27.333 3.409

Flow Routing Continuity

Volume hectare-m ——–0.000 1.967 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.965 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002

Volume Mliters ——–0.000 19.671 0.000 0.000 0.000 19.653 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 284 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Continuity Error (%) …..

-0.011

EPA SWMM Time of Concentration Computations Report

Tc = (0.94 * (L^0.6) * (n^0.6)) / ((i^0.4) * (S^0.3)) Where: Tc = Time of Concentration (min) L = Flow Length (ft) n = Manning’s Roughness i = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) S = Slope (ft/ft) —————Subbasin P100 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

68.00 0.21250 0.02150 3.72500 3.72500 0.50000 77.17

—————Subbasin P101 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

182.38 0.23930 0.02401 3.72500 3.72500 1.60000 131.99

—————Subbasin P102 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

458.10 0.33050 0.02750 3.72500 3.72500 2.60000 251.93

—————Subbasin P200 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

141.85 0.23930 0.02401 3.72500 3.72500 1.90000 107.90

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 285 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

—————Subbasin P201 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

147.65 0.21500 0.02300 3.72500 3.72500 4.10000 85.98

—————Subbasin P300 —————Flow length (m): Pervious Manning’s Roughness: Impervious Manning’s Roughness: Pervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Impervious Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr): Slope (%): Computed TOC (minutes):

115.38 0.23600 0.02390 3.72500 3.72500 3.60000 79.88

337.33 0.36750 0.02025 3.72500 3.72500 0.70000 261.19

Subbasin Runoff Summary

——————————————————————————————————Subbasin Total Total Total Total Total Peak Runoff Time of ID Rainfall Runon Evap. Infil. Runoff Runoff Coefficient Concentration mm mm mm mm mm cms days hh:mm:ss ——————————————————————————————————P100 89.40 0.00 0.00 40.82 48.08 0.52 0.538 0 01:17:10 P101 89.40 0.00 0.00 57.12 32.30 1.01 0.361 0 02:11:59 P102 89.40 0.00 0.00 63.86 20.23 0.69 0.226 0 04:11:56 P200 89.40 5.91 0.00 56.62 38.90 1.14 0.408 0 01:47:54 P201 89.40 0.00 0.00 59.59 30.74 0.26 0.344 0 01:25:58 P300 89.40 0.00 0.00 57.60 32.58 0.26 0.364 0 01:19:53 WTLD 89.40 200.60 0.00 48.37 228.78 0.61 0.789 0

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 286 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

04:21:11 ——————————————————————————————————****************** Node Depth Summary

—————————————————————————————-Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained Volume Flooded m m m days hh:mm ha-mm minutes hh:mm:ss —————————————————————————————-A1 0.07 0.41 125.91 0 12:32 0 0 0:00:00 A2 0.18 0.66 125.41 0 12:21 0 0 0:00:00 OUTLET1_OUT 0.07 0.46 123.66 0 12:21 0 0 0:00:00 OUTLET2 0.00 0.00 119.40 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 OUTLET3 0.00 0.00 128.15 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00

Node Flow Summary

———————————————————————————–Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak Inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cms cms days hh:mm cms days hh:mm ———————————————————————————–A1 JUNCTION 0.687 0.687 0 12:30 0.00 A2 JUNCTION 1.008 1.610 0 12:17 0.00 OUTLET1_OUT OUTFALL 0.519 2.041 0 12:19 0.00 OUTLET2 OUTFALL 0.611 0.611 0 13:00 0.00 OUTLET3 OUTFALL 0.261 0.261 0 12:15 0.00

Outfall Loading Summary

———————————————-Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cms cms ———————————————-OUTLET1_OUT 98.58 0.154 2.041 OUTLET2 96.39 0.069 0.611 OUTLET3 79.14 0.011 0.261 ———————————————-System 91.37 0.234 2.474

Link Flow Summary

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 287 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Maximum

Time

Flow

Surcharged

Depth

minutes

Condition Occurrence

Attained

Analysis

Capacity

/Design

days hh:mm

m/sec

cms

Flow

——————————————————————————————————————————Link-07 CHANNEL 0 12:32 0.53 1.00 0.685 2.254 0.30 0.75 0 Calculated Link-08 CHANNEL 0 12:21 1.38 1.00 1.593 2.157 0.74 0.84 0 Calculated

Flow Classification Summary

—————————————————————————— Fraction of Time in Flow Class —Avg. Avg. Up Down Sub Sup Up Down Froude Flow Link Dry Dry Dry Crit Crit Crit Crit Number Change —————————————————————————Link-07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.0002 Link-08 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.0005

Time-Step Critical Elements

None

Highest Flow Instability Indexes

All links are stable.

Routing Time Step Summary

Minimum Time Step : Average Time Step : Maximum Time Step : Percent in Steady State : Average Iterations per Step :

30.00 sec 29.99 sec 30.00 sec 0.00 2.00

Analysis began on: Wed Nov 27 15:57:00 2019 Analysis ended on: Wed Nov 27 15:57:01 2019 Total elapsed time: 00:00:01

Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 288 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 Phone: 613-548-9400 Ext. 351 Fax: 613-548-8460 Email: planning@frontenaccounty.ca

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Related File Number(s):

File Number: 10T-2020/001 Date Received:

April 2020 Date Application Considered Complete:

May 28, 2020 Amount Paid ($): County cheques and CRCA cheques submitted.

Concurrent Applications Filed (Attach Appropriate forms and fees):

 Official Plan Amendment ✔ Zoning By-Law Amendment 

Print in black or blue ink, complete or () appropriate box(es).

APPLICANT INFORMATION 1.1 Name of Owner(s). An owner’s authorization is required in Section 11.1, if the applicant is not the owner. Attach additional pages if required. Name of Owner(s) Home Phone Business Phone Number Number

Steve McLure - 2628100 Ontario Inc. Address

Email Address

Fax Number

1.2 Agent/Applicant – Name of the person who is to be contacted about the application, if different than the owner. This may be a person or firm acting on behalf of the owner. Name of Contact Person Contact Phone Business Phone Number Number Kyle Nielissen 613-561-9265 613-634-9009 Address

Email Address

1329 Gardiners Road, Kingston ON 1.3 Planning Consultant Name of Planner

Fax Number

kyle.nielissen@forefr onteng.ca Contact Phone Number

Business Phone Number

Fotenn Planning + Design

Address

613-634-9009 Email Address

6 Cataraqui Street, Suite 108, Kingston ON 1.4 Ontario Land Surveyor Name of Surveyor

866-354-1093

Fax Number

keene@fotenn.com

Home Phone

Hopkins Chitty Land Surveyors Inc.

Business Phone 613-384-9266

Page 1 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 289 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION Address 634-636 Norris Court Kingston, ON K7P 2R9

Email Address

Fax Number

pchitty@hopkinschitty.com

(613) 384-3513

DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT LAND 2.1 The Lands Local Municipality/Township (check one)

Geographic Village/Town (if applicable)

 Township of North Frontenac  Township of Central Frontenac  Township of South Frontenac  Frontenac Islands

Loughborough

Concession Number 2

Lot Number Part of Lots 25 & 26

Street Number (if applicable)

Name of Road/Street

Reference Plan Plan 13R - 20835 Plan 13R - 20303 Registered Plan Number

Part(s) 1 3 Lot(s) Block(s)

Battersea Road Roll Number 060 030 04215 0000

Property Identification Number (PIN) 36291-0901 (LT)

2.2 Are there any easements or restrictive covenants affecting the subject lands?

 Yes  No (If Yes, describe each easement or covenant and its effect)

2.3 Is this application for approval of a: ✔ Draft Plan of Subdivision 

 Plan of Condominium (complete Section 3)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CONDOMINIUM APPLICATIONS ONLY 3.1 If a plan of condominium, indicate the type proposed:

 Standard – The standard form of single condominium (freehold units).  Amalgamation – Where two or more corporations may amalgamate. Provide a plan showing the relationship of the previous condominiums to be amalgamated. Provide file numbers, approval dates, etc.

 Vacant Land – Condominiums in which each owner may decide what type of structure, if any, will be built on their lot (unit). Provide information on proposed servicing and status of required permits.

 Common Elements – Condominiums in which common elements are defined (i.e. roads, golf course, ski hill) but the corporation has no units. The parcel of land on which a house sits is considered a parcel of tied land (POTL). Provide a map showing the affected freehold properties outside of the specific condominium site. Identify common element and property ownerships.

 Leasehold – The land is not owned by the condominium corporation. Once the ground lease expires, the owner’s right to occupy the unit is automatically terminated. The initial term of the lease Page 2 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 290 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION must be from 40 years to 99 years and the leasehold unit owner could sell the unit without the consent of the landlord. Provide information regarding what happens at the end of the lease period. Give dates.

 Phased – Condominium developments which would allow a single condominium to be built in phases. Provide a summary outline of the number of units and common elements to be developed in each specific phase and any common elements to be available in subsequent phases. 3.2 General Condominium Information

 Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No  Yes  No

Has a site plan for the proposed condominium been approved? Has a site plan agreement been entered into? Has a building permit for the proposed condominium been issued? Is the proposed condominium under construction?

If construction is completed, indicate date of completion. ______________________

 Yes  No

Is this a conversion of a building containing rental residential units?

If yes, indicate the number of units to be converted. __________________________ If the building to be converted includes one or more rental residential units, this application must be submitted to the local municipality, not the County of Frontenac, as required by the Rental Housing Protection Act.

PROPOSED AND CURRENT LAND USE 4.1 Complete Table A on Proposed Land Use Table A – Proposed Land Use (* complete only if for approval of condominium description) Proposed Land Use Number of Number of Area (ha) of Density (Units/ Number of Units or Lots and/or Land shown Dwellings per Parking Dwellings on Blocks on on Draft ha) on Draft Spaces Draft Plan Draft Plan Plan Plan Residential

31 31 28.79 1.08 Detached * Semi-Detached Multiple Attached Apartment Seasonal Mobile Home Other (specify) Non-Residential Commercial Industrial Park or Open Space

N/A

0.04

N/A

2.64

N/A

0.19 31.66

Institutional (specify) Roads Other Use (specify) Totals

0.98

Proposed Other Uses – Provide a Description of Use (if applicable) Other Residential

Page 3 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 291 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION Institutional

Other Uses Refer to Planning Report prepared by Fotenn. 4.2 What is the current use of the land? (i.e. vacant, residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial) Single detached residential dwelling

4.3 How is the subject land designated in any applicable official plan? (i.e. rural, settlement area) Frontenac County Official Plan: Settlement

Township Official Plan:

Settlement Area 4.4 Have you confirmed that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the applicable official plans (County and Township)?

 Yes  No If Yes, explain how the draft plan conforms to these plans. (If an official plan amendment is needed, it should be submitted prior to or concurrently with this application.)

Refer to Planning Report prepared by Fotenn.

4.5 Has there been an industrial or commercial use on the subject land or adjacent land?

 Yes  No (If Yes, specify the uses)

4.6 Has the grading of the subject land been altered by adding earth or other material? 4.7 Has a gas station been located on the subject land or adjacent land at any time?

✔ No  Unknown  Yes 

4.8 Has there been a petroleum or other fuel storage on the subject land or adjacent land at any time?

✔ No  Unknown  Yes 

4.9 Is there reason to believe the subject land may have been contaminated by any former uses on the subject land or adjacent land?

 Yes  No  Unknown

4.10 What information did you use to determine the answers to the above questions? (i.e. land owners, municipal information, technical studies)

Land owners
Municipal information
Site review

4.11 Previous Use Inventory If Yes, to (4.5), (4.6), (4.7), (4.8) or (4.9), a previous use inventory showing all former uses of the subject and/or of the adjacent land, if appropriate, is needed. Is the previous use inventory attached?

 Yes  No Page 4 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 292 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION

CONSULTATION WITH COUNTY AND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY 5.1 Has the draft plan of subdivision or condominium description that is the subject of this application been presented to the local municipal council?

 Yes  No 5.2 Have you confirmed with the local municipality that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the municipal official plan?

 Yes  No 5.3 Have you confirmed with the County that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the county official plan?

 Yes  No 6. APPLICABLE ACTS 6.1 Other Applications under the Planning Act Has the subject land ever been, or is it currently, the subject of an application for approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act, for a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act, for a minor variance, for approval of a site plan, or for an amendment to an official plan, a zoning by-law or a Minister’s zoning order? If yes, specify below.

 Yes  No Application Type (check all applicable)  Plan of Subdivision

Application Number

Date of Application

Status of Application

 Consent  Minor Variance  Site Plan Approval  Official Plan Amendment  Zoning By-law Amendment  Minister’s Zoning Order Amendment 6.2 If the subject land is covered by a Minister’s Zoning Order, what is the Ontario Regulation Number? N/A

6.3 Environmental Assessment Act Are the water, sewage or road works associated with the proposed development subject to the provisions of the Environmental Assessment Act?

 Yes  No If yes, will the notice of public meeting for this application be modified to state that the public meeting will address the requirements of both the Planning Act and the Environmental Assessment Act?

 Yes  No

Page 5 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 293 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION 6.4 Other Provincial Plans Is the subject land within an area of land designated under any provincial plan or plans? (I.e. Greenbelt Plan, Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, etc.)

 Yes  No  Unknown If yes, explain how the draft plan conforms or does not conflict with the provincial plan or plans.

PROVINCIAL POLICY 7.1 Briefly explain how this plan is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement issued under subsection 3(1) of the Planning Act.

Refer to Planning Report by Fotenn 7.2 Table B below lists the features or development circumstances of interest to the Province. Complete Table B and be advised of the potential information requirements in noted section. TABLE B - Significant Features Checklist

If a feature, is it on-site or If a within 500 feature, metres? specify Feature or Development
If a the Potential Information Needs Circumstances development distance circumstance, in does it apply? metres Yes () No () Demonstrate sufficient need within Non-farm development near 20-year projections and that designated urban areas or proposed development will not ✔ 0 rural settlement area

hinder efficient expansion of urban metres or rural settlement areas Assess development for residential and other sensitive uses within 70m

Class 1 industry1

✔

metres

Class 2 industry2

✔

metres

Class 3 industry3

✔

metres

Land Fill Site

✔

metres

Sewage Treatment Plant

✔

metres

Waste Stabilization pond

✔

metres

Active railway line

✔

metres

Evaluate impacts within 100m

Controlled access highways or freeways including designated future ones

✔

metres

Evaluate impacts within 100m

Assess development for residential and other sensitive uses within 300m Assess development for residential and other sensitive uses within 1000m Address possible leachate, odour, vermin and other impacts from limit of licensed-fill area Assess the need for a feasibility study for residential and other sensitive land uses Assess the need for a feasibility study for residential and other sensitive land uses

Page 6 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 294 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION

Feature or Development Circumstances

If a feature, is it on-site or within 500 metres?
If a development circumstance, does it apply? Yes () No ()

If a feature, specify the distance in metres

Operating mine site

✔

Non-operating mine site within 1000m

✔

Airports where noise exposure forecast (NEF) or noise exposure projection (NEP) is 28 or greater

✔

Electric transformer station

✔

metres

High voltage electric transmission line

✔

metres

Transportation and infrastructure corridors

✔

metres

Prime agricultural land

✔

metres

Agricultural operations

metres

✔

130

metres

Potential Information Needs

Will development hinder continuation or expansion of operations? Have potential impacts been address? Has the mine been rehabilitated so there will be no adverse effects? Demonstrate feasibility of development above 28 NEF for sensitive land uses. Above the 35 NEF/NEP, development of sensitive land uses is not permitted Determine possible impacts within 200m Consult the appropriate electric power service Will the corridor be protected? Demonstrate need for use other than agricultural and indicate how impacts are to be mitigated Development to comply with the Minimum Distance Separation Formulae Will development hinder access to the resource or the establishment of new resource operations?

Mineral aggregate resource areas

✔

metres

Mineral aggregate operations

✔

metres

Mineral and petroleum resource areas

✔

metres

Existing pits and quarries

✔

metres

Significant wetlands south and east of the Canadian Shield

✔

metres

Development is not permitted

Significant wetlands in the Canadian Shield

✔

Demonstrate no negative impacts

Significant portions of habitat of endangered and threatened species

✔

metres

Will development hinder continuation of extraction? Will development hinder access to the resource or the establishment of new resource operations? Will development hinder continued operation or expansion?

Development is not permitted

Page 7 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 295 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION

Feature or Development Circumstances

Significant fish habitat, woodlands south and east of the Canadian Shield, valley lands, areas of natural and scientific interest, wildlife habitat Sensitive groundwater recharge areas, headwaters and aquifers Significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes

Significant archaeological resources

Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River System and Large Inland Lakes:

within defined portions of dynamic beach and 1:100 year flood level along connecting channels
on lands subject to flooding and erosion

If a feature, is it on-site or within 500 metres?
If a development circumstance, does it apply? Yes () No ()

Potential Information Needs

Demonstrate no negative impacts

✔

metres

✔ ✔

✔

Demonstrate that groundwater recharge areas, headwaters and aquifers will be protected Development should conserve significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes Assess development proposed in areas of medium and high potential for significant archaeological resources. These sources are to be studied and preserved, or where appropriate, removed, catalogued and analysed prior to development Development is not permitted

✔

Erosion hazards

✔

Floodplains

✔

Hazardous sites

✔

Rehabilitated mine sites

✔

Contaminated sites

✔

If a feature, specify the distance in metres

Development may be permitted; demonstrate that hazards can be safely addressed Determine feasibility within the 1:100 year erosion limits of ravines, river valleys and streams Where one-zone flood plain management is in effect, development is not permitted within the floodplain Where two-zone flood plain management is in effect, development is not permitted within the floodway Where a Special Policy Area (SPA) is in effect, development must conform with official plan policies for the SPA Demonstrate that hazards can be addressed Application for approval from Ministry of Northern Development and Mines should be made concurrently Assess an inventory or previous uses in areas of possible soil contamination Page 8 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 296 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION

Class 1 Industry – small scale, self-contained plant, no outside storage, low probability of fugitive emissions and daytime operations only.
Class 2 Industry – medium scale processing and manufacturing with outdoor storage, periodic output of emissions, shift operations and daytime truck traffic.
Class 3 Industry – indicate if within 1000m - processing and manufacturing with frequent and intense off-site impacts and a high probability of fugitive emissions.
Hazardous Sites – property or lands that could be unsafe for development or alteration due to naturally occurring hazard. These hazards may include unstable soils (sensitive marine clays (Leda), organic soils) or unstable bedrock (Karst topography).

7.3 For applications that include permanent housing (i.e. not seasonal) complete Table C - Housing Affordability. For each type of housing and unit size, complete the rest of the row. If lots are to be sold as vacant lots, indicate the lot frontage. Information should be based on the best information available at the time of application. If additional space is needed, attach on a separate page. Table C - Housing Affordability For example: Semi-detached - 10 units; 1000 sq. ft./5.5 metres, $119,900 Housing Type

of Units

Unit Size (sq. ft.) and/or Lot Frontage

Estimated Selling Price/Rent

Semi-Detached

Link/Semi-Detached

Row or Townhouse

Apartment Block

0 Other types or Multiples 7.4 Is there any other information which may relate to the Affordability of the proposed housing, or the type of housing needs served by the proposal?

 Yes  No

If yes, explain below or attach a separate page.

SERVICING 8.1 Indicate in a) and b) the proposed servicing type for the subject land. Select the appropriate servicing type from Table D – Sewage Disposal and Water Supply. Provide the title of the service information/reports as indicated in Table D and attach copies of all required reports. a) Indicate the proposed sewage disposal system.

Individual Septic Systems b) Indicate the proposed water supply system. Individual wells. See Hydrogeoloical Assessment by BluMetric Environmental

c) Name(s) of servicing information/reports. Hydrogeological Assessment by BluMetric Environmental ✔ Attached 

Page 9 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 297 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION Table D – Sewage Disposal and Water Supply Sewage Disposal

Publicly owned and Municipality should confirm that capacity will be available to service operated piped sanitary the development at the time of lot creation or re-zoning sewage system
Privately owned and Communal systems for the development of more than 5 lots/units: operated communal SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT1, HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2, septic system and indication whether a public body is willing to own and operate the system³
Individual septic systems

Communal systems for the development of 5 or less lots/units and generating less than 4500 litres per day effluent as a result of the development being completed: HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 Communal systems for the development of fewer than 5 lots or units and generating more than 4500 litres per day of effluent per day as a result of the development being completed: SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT; and HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2. Individual septic systems for the development of more than 5 lots/units: SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT1 and HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 Individual septic systems for the development of 5 or less lots/units and generating less than 4500 litres per day effluent: HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2

Other Water Supply
Publicly owned and operated piped water system
Public or privately owned and operated communal well(s)
Individual well(s)

Individual septic systems for the development of fewer than 5 lots/units and generating more than 4500 litres per day of effluent as a result of the development being completed: SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT; and HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 To be described by applicant Municipality should confirm that capacity will be available to service development at the time of lot creation or re-zoning Communal well systems for the development of more than 5 lots/units: SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT1, HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 and indication whether a public body is willing to own and operate the system³ Communal well systems for non-residential development where water will be used for human consumption: HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 Individual wells for the development of more than 5 lots/units: SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT1, and HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 Individual wells for non-residential development where water will be used for human consumption: HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT2 Approval of a “water taking permit” under section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act is necessary for this type of servicing SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT To be described by applicant

Communal surface water
Individual surface water
Other (I.e. lake) Notes:

Confirmation that the municipality concurs with the SERVICING OPTIONS REPORT will facilitate the review of the proposal.
Before undertaking a HYDROGEOLOGICAL REPORT, consult the Subdivision Approval Authority about the type of HYDROGEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT that is expected given the nature and location of the proposal.
Where communal services are proposed (water and/or sewage), these services must be owned by the municipality.
A Certificate of Approval from the local Public Health Unit or MOEE submitted with this application will facilitate the review.

Page 10 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 298 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION 8.2 Indicate in a) and b) the proposed type of storm drainage and access to the subject land. Select the appropriate type from Table E – Storm Drainage, Road Access and Water Access. Provide the title of the service information/reports as indicated in Table E and attach copies of all required reports. a) Indicate the proposed storm drainage system.

Ditches & Swales b) Indicate the proposed road access.

Municipal road maintained year-round (new street proposed). c) Is water access proposed?

 Yes  No If yes, attach a description of the parking and docking facilities to be used and the approximate distance of these facilities from the subject land and the nearest public road. d) Is the preliminary storm water management report attached?

 Yes  No

If not attached as a separate report, in what report can it be found?

e) Name(s) of servicing information/reports.

Sunbury Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report  ✔ Attached Table E – Storm Drainage, Road Access and Water Access Storm Drainage

Sewers
Ditches or Swales
Other

A preliminary storm water management report is recommended and should be prepared concurrent with any hydrogeological reports for submission with the application. A storm water management plan will be needed prior to final approval of a plan of subdivision or as a requirement of site plan approval.

Road Access

Provincial Highway

Application for an access permit should be made prior to submitting this application. An access permit is required from MTO before any development can occur. 2) Municipal or other public Detailed road alignment and access will be confirmed when the road maintained yeardevelopment application is made. round 3) Municipal road or other Subdivision or condominium development is not usually permitted on public road maintained seasonally maintained roads. seasonally 4) Right-of-way/Private Access by right of ways on private roads are not usually permitted, Road except as part of condominium. Water Access Information from the owner of the parking and docking facilities to be used regarding the capacity of the facilities to accommodate the proposal and the approximate distance of these facilities from the subject land and the nearest public road.

OTHER INFORMATION 9.1 Is there any other information that may be useful to the County of Frontenac in reviewing this development proposal (e.g. efforts made to resolve outstanding objections or concerns)? If so, explain below or attach a separate page.

Page 11 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 299 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

PLAN OF SUBDIVISION/CONDOMINIUM APPLICATION 9.2 Does the subject land contain any areas of archaeological potential?

 Yes  No  Unknown 9.3 Does the plan permit development on land that contains known archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential?

 Yes  No  Unknown

If yes, provide the following information/reports. a) An Archaeological Assessment prepared by a person who holds a licence that is effective with respect to the subject land, issued under Part VI (Conservation of Resources of Archaeological Value) of the Ontario Heritage Act; and b) A conservation plan for any archaeological resources identified in the assessment.

Page 12 of 14

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 300 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 301 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 302 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

March 11, 2020

Reference No. 11208719

Mr. Steve McLure 2628100 Ontario Inc. 19 Deer Creek Drive Elginburg, ON K0H 1M0 Dear Mr. McLure: Re:

Traffic Impact Study Sunbury Subdivision (Sunbury Road & County Road 11), South Frontenac

Introduction

The proposed development will have 31 single family homes and the site is located to the west of Battersea Road and to the north of Moreland Dixon Road. Nearby, there are existing residential properties, local businesses and the Storrington Centre fire station and a branch of the Kingston Frontenac public library. The proposed site layout is shown in Figure 1, attached. The posted speed limit on Battersea Road and Sunbury Road is 60 km/h. Battersea Road acts as a key north/ south arterial road and connects the Township to the City of Kingston. Sunbury Road is an east/west arterial road, which connects to Highway 15 in the east.

Existing Conditions

2.1

Traffic Data

Traffic data for the Battersea Road/Sunbury Road intersection was collected on Thursday February 13, 2020. The traffic count data is provided in Appendix A. The peak periods are 07:00-08:00 AM and 4:155:15 PM. The turning movement volumes for the existing conditions are shown in Figure 2, attached. 2.2

Traffic Operations

The intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road was analysed using the traffic engineering software, Synchro Version 10 and the methodologies published in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM). Synchro outputs include multiple measures of effectiveness, including Level of Service (LOS) and volume to capacity ratio (v/c) for each approach and the overall intersection. LOS is defined in terms of average control delay per vehicle according to HCM criteria. LOS are expressed in a range from “A” through “F,” with “A” being the highest level of service, and “F” representing the lowest level of service. Table 1 presents the thresholds for LOS “A” through “F” for stop controlled intersections. The v/c ratio represents the capability to accommodate the traffic demand. As the v/c ratio approaches 1.0 there is an increased possibility of delays and queuing. Once the v/c ratio exceeds 1.0, excessive delays and queues are expected.

GHD 179 Colonnade Road South Suite 400 Ottawa Ontario K2E 7J4 Canada T 613 727 0510 F 613 727 0704 W www.ghd.com

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 303 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for a Stop-controlled intersection Level of Service A B C D E F

Delay/Vehicle (seconds) < 10 10 – 15 15 – 25 25 – 35 35 – 50

50

Table 2 provides a summary of the existing intersection operations. Detailed Synchro analysis output reports are provided in Appendix B. Table 2: Summary of Existing Intersection Operations Intersection Approach

Sunbury Rd Westbound Battersea Rd Northbound Battersea Rd Southbound

AM Delay (s)

LOS

v/c

10.5

0.09

0.0

7.7

0.002

PM Overall LOS

Overall LOS

Delay (s)

LOS

v/c

10.6

0.06

0.0

7.8

0.003

As shown in Table 2, the 2020 existing capacity analyses indicate that the intersection operates with acceptable LOS and v/c ratios in current conditions.

Proposed Development

The proposed development will have 31 single family homes. Access to the site will be from an access opposite Sunbury Road. The existing three-leg stop controlled intersection will become a four-leg intersection with an additional stop control. The proposed access road across the site is approximately 1.3 km in length and ends in a cul-de-sac. It is anticipated that construction of the development will be completed by 2021. 3.1

Trip Generation

The projected site trips were estimated based on trip generation rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition. The fitted curved equations for Single Family Housing (Land Use Code 210) were used to provide the number of trips generated by the development. The resulting trip generation is presented in Table 3 and Table 4.

RPT-03-11-2020_Sunbury TIS_11208719.docx

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 304 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Table 3: Peak Hour (AM) Trip Generation ITE Land Use Proposed Residential subdivision

Description Single Family Housing

Code

Variable

Units

Equation

210

Dwelling units

T=0.71(X) +4.8

% Enter

% Exit

Total

Enter

Exit

25%

75%

Table 4: Peak Hour (PM) Trip Generation ITE Land Use

Proposed

Description

Code

Variable

Units

Residential subdivision

Single Family Housing

210

Dwelling units

Equation Ln(T)= 0.96Ln(X)+ 0.20

% Enter

% Exit

Total

Enter

Exit

63%

37%

The development will generate a total of 27 trips in the AM peak hour and 33 trips in the PM peak hour. 3.2

Trip Distribution

Based on a review of the existing traffic volumes and turning movements at the intersection of Battersea Road and Sunbury Road the trip distribution was developed for the site traffic and is presented in Table 5. Table 5: Trip Distribution Road (approach) Battersea Road (north) Battersea Road (south) Sunbury Road

Exit 10% 78% 12%

Enter 16% 74% 10%

Vehicular trips to and from the site were added to the network at the site access point. The site generated traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, attached.

Traffic Operations Analysis

4.1

Overview

The development is expected to be built-out by the year 2021 (Opening year). The intersection in the study area was therefore analyzed for the following scenarios: 

Opening year (2021) + No development



Opening year (2021) + Development



Future year (2026). Five years post-development

RPT-03-11-2020_Sunbury TIS_11208719.docx

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 305 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

4.2

Growth

Background traffic growth is related to residential and commercial growth in the Township and is non-site related traffic. The background traffic growth rate was calculated based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes between 2014 and 2018 for Battersea Road from the count stations nearest the site. The traffic data was provided by the Township of South Frontenac and is shown in Table 6. Table 6: Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) for Battersea Road AADT

Year

North of Sunbury 2937 2872 2925 3275 n/a

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

South of Sunbury 4057 n/a 4140 3600 3387

South of Moreland Dixon n/a 4807 3722 3159 4531

An average negative growth rate was determined from the data at the three count stations in the area. A growth rate of 0% was selected to represent to expected future traffic on Battersea Road since the overall traffic volumes are decreasing. 4.3

Traffic Operations - Opening Year (2021) + No Development

Background traffic volumes for the Opening year (2021) are the same as the existing 2020 traffic volumes (i.e. Figure 2, attached) due to there being no background growth, therefore the capacity analysis results are the same as Table 2 with an acceptable LOS for all movements in both the AM and PM peak hours. 4.4

Traffic Operations - Opening Year (2021) + Development

The traffic operations for the build-out year of 2021 was analysed and the results are presented in Table 7. The total traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4, attached. The detailed Synchro analysis output reports are provided in Appendix B. Table 7: Synchro Results Summary - Opening Year (2021) + Development AM

Intersection Approach Street A Eastbound Sunbury Rd Westbound Battersea Rd Northbound Battersea Rd Southbound

Delay (s)

LOS

v/c

9.7

0.03

11.1

0.1

PM Overall LOS Delay (s)

LOS

v/c

9.1

0.02

11.6

0.07

Overall LOS

7.7

0.004

7.4

0.01

7.7

0.002

8.2

0.003

RPT-03-11-2020_Sunbury TIS_11208719.docx

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 306 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

The intersection operates at an acceptable LOS for all movements in both the AM and PM peak hours. 4.5

Traffic Operations – Future Year (2026) Post Development

The traffic operations for the post-development horizon year of 2026 are the same as the opening year with development traffic since there is no expected background traffic growth. The capacity analysis results are the same as shown in Table 7 with acceptable LOS for all movements in both the AM and PM peak hours.

Conclusions

The proposed development will add a low number of trips to the area roadways. The site is projected to generate 27 new trips during the AM peak hour and 33 new trips during the PM peak hour. Based on the results of the capacity analyses for 2021 and 2026 future conditions, it was determined that the area roadways can adequately accommodate the site traffic. Should you have any questions on the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, GHD

Vanessa Skelton, P.Eng. Encl.

RPT-03-11-2020_Sunbury TIS_11208719.docx

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 307 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Figures

GHD | Traffic Impact Study | 11208719

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 308 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

11208719

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - SUNBURY SUBDIVISION March 2020

PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT

FIGURE 1

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 309 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

11208719

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - SUNBURY SUBDIVISION March 2020

2020 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

FIGURE 2

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 310 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

11208719

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - SUNBURY SUBDIVISION March 2020

SITE GENERATED TRIPS

FIGURE 3

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 311 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

11208719

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY - SUNBURY SUBDIVISION March 2020

2021 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (OPENING + DEVELOPMENT)

FIGURE 4

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 312 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Appendices

GHD | Traffic Impact Study | 11208719

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 313 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Appendix A Raw Traffic Count Data

GHD | Traffic Impact Study | 11208719

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 314 of 320

16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45

16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00

Battersea Road @ Sunbury Road PM counts February 13, 2020 Northbound (Battersea Rd) Southbound (Battersea Road) Westbound (Sunbury Road) RT TH LT TH LT RT 11 12 0 20 11 0 15 48 1 18 8 1 21 51 1 15 13 1 14 52 0 9 6 0 20 44 1 11 6 1 14 43 1 15 7 0 16 26 0 8 6 0 2 22 1 12 2 1 am peak

52 83 102 75 83 77 56 40

Total

Start

End

54 91 102 81 83 80 56 40

16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00

17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00

76 86 86 70 73 57 59 63

Heavy Vehicles 2 8 0 6 0 3 0 0

Cars

End 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00

pm peak 13‐Feb‐20

13‐Feb‐20

55 WESTBOUND SUNBURY ROAD

Battersea Road @ Sunbury Road Peak Hour Northbound (Battersea Rd) Southbound (Battersea Road) RT TH LT TH 61 163 2 62 70 195 3 53 69 190 3 50 64 165 2 43 52 135 3 46

Westbound (Sunbury Road) LT RT 38 2 33 3 32 2 25 1 21 2

16:15‐17:15

Total 318 315 286 259 252

Total 328 357 346 300 259

13‐Feb‐20

193 3

Westbound (Sunbury Road) LT RT 55 4 53 4 51 4 41 3 50 3

combined peak

7:00‐8:00

29 34

Battersea Road @ Sunbury Road Peak Hour Northbound (Battersea Rd) Southbound (Battersea Road) RT TH LT TH 34 29 3 193 28 35 2 193 22 38 2 169 15 49 2 149 17 54 1 127

195 70

53 3

33 WESTBOUND SUNBURY ROAD

195 29 70 34

193 53 33

33 55

WESTBOUND SUNBURY ROAD

SOUTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

End

Start 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00

NORTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

Start

69 85 81 63 61 54 58 55

Total

SOUTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00

Heavy Vehicles 7 1 5 7 12 3 1 8

Cars

NORTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45

Battersea Road @ Sunbury Road AM counts February 13, 2020 Northbound (Battersea Rd) Southbound (Battersea Road) Westbound (Sunbury Road) RT TH LT TH LT RT 7 3 1 50 14 1 10 8 0 54 13 1 11 6 1 49 18 1 6 12 1 40 10 1 1 9 0 50 12 1 4 11 0 30 11 1 4 17 1 29 8 0 8 17 0 18 19 1

SOUTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

End

NORTHBOUND BATTERSEA ROAD

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Start

3 4

AGENDA ITEM #

Page 315 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

Appendix B Detailed Synchro Reports

GHD | Traffic Impact Study | 11208719

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Page 316 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HCM 6th TWSC 3: Battersea Rd & Sunbury Rd

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh

03/04/2020

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 4 29 34 3 193 Future Vol, veh/h 55 4 29 34 3 193 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized

None
None
None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 38 16 13 33 4 Mvmt Flow 60 4 32 37 3 210 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All 267 51 0 Stage 1 51 Stage 2 216 Critical Hdwy 6.46 6.58 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.46 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.46 Follow-up Hdwy 3.554 3.642 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 714 924 Stage 1 961 Stage 2 811 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 712 924 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 712 Stage 1 961 Stage 2 809 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)

WB 10.5 B

Major2 0 69

4.43
2.497
1356
1356

NB 0

0

SB 0.1

NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL

723 1356
0.089 0.002
10.5 7.7 B A 0.3 0

SBT 0 A

Existing (2020) AM Peak 03-04-2020 03/04/2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Synchro 10 Report Page 1

Page 317 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HCM 6th TWSC 3: Battersea Rd & Sunbury Rd

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh

03/04/2020

1.1

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 33 3 195 70 3 53 Future Vol, veh/h 33 3 195 70 3 53 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized

None
None
None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 0 2 2 0 7 Mvmt Flow 36 3 212 76 3 58 Major/Minor Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 314 Stage 1 250 Stage 2 64 Critical Hdwy 6.47 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 669 Stage 1 780 Stage 2 946 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 668 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 668 Stage 1 780 Stage 2 944 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)

WB 10.6 B

Major1 0 794

Major2 0 288 4.1 2.2

1286
1286

NB 0

SB 0.4

250 6.2 3.3 794

NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL

677 1286
0.058 0.003
10.6 7.8 B A 0.2 0

0 SBT 0 A

Existing (2020) PM Peak 03-04-2020 03/04/2020

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Synchro 10 Report Page 1

Page 318 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HCM 6th TWSC 3: Battersea Rd & Street A/Sunbury Rd

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh

03/12/2020

2.7

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 16 55 1 4 5 29 34 3 193 1 Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 16 55 1 4 5 29 34 3 193 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized

None
None
None
None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 6 2 38 2 16 13 33 4 2 Mvmt Flow 2 2 17 60 1 4 5 32 37 3 210 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All 280 296 211 287 278 51 211 Stage 1 217 217 61 61 Stage 2 63 79
226 217 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.16 6.52 6.58 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52
6.16 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52
6.16 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.554 4.018 3.642 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 672 616 829 657 630 924 1360 Stage 1 785 723
940 844 Stage 2 948 829
768 723 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 665 612 829 638 626 924 1360 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 665 612
638 626 Stage 1 782 721
936 841 Stage 2 939 826
747 721 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)

EB 9.7 A

WB 11.1 B NBL 1360 0.004 7.7 A 0

0

Major2 0 69

4.43
2.497
1356
1356

NB 0.6

NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL

782 651 1356
0.028 0.1 0.002 0 9.7 11.1 7.7 A A B A 0.1 0.3 0

0

SB 0.1

SBT SBR 0 A

2021 AM Peak TOTAL 03-11-2020 03/11/2020 Vanessa

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Synchro 10 Report Page 1

Page 319 of 320

AGENDA ITEM #

HCM 6th TWSC 3: Battersea Rd & Street A/Sunbury Rd

Intersection Int Delay, s/veh

03/12/2020

1.8

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 1 10 33 2 3 15 195 70 3 53 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 1 10 33 2 3 15 195 70 3 53 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized

None
None
None
None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 6 2 38 2 16 13 33 4 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 11 36 2 3 16 212 76 3 58 3 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Conflicting Flow All 351 386 60 354 349 250 61 Stage 1 66 66
282 282 Stage 2 285 320 72 67 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.16 6.52 6.58 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52
6.16 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52
6.16 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.554 4.018 3.642 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 604 548 1005 594 575 708 1542 Stage 1 945 840
716 678 Stage 2 722 652
928 839 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 593 540 1005 580 566 708 1542 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 593 540
580 566 Stage 1 934 837
707 670 Stage 2 708 644
914 836 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)

EB 9.1 A

WB 11.6 B NBL 1542 0.011 7.4 A 0

0

Major2 0 288

4.43
2.497
1116
1116

NB 0.4

NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL

890 588 1116
0.015 0.07 0.003 0 9.1 11.6 8.2 A A B A 0 0.2 0

0

SB 0.4

SBT SBR 0 A

2021 PM Peak TOTAL 03-11-2020 03/11/2020 Vanessa

2019-066 Open House Proposed Plan of Subdivision 10T-2020/001 (Sunbury, …

Synchro 10 Report Page 1

Page 320 of 320

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.