Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: June 19, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Regular Council/2019/Regular Council - 19 Jun 2019 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
Frontenac County Council Meeting Wednesday, June 19, 2019 – 9:00 a.m. Kingston Frontenac Rotary Auditorium, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie Council will resolve into Closed Meeting and will reconvene as regular Council at 9:30 a.m.
AGENDA Page Call to Order Closed Session a) Resolved That Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole closed session as authorized under Section 239 of The Municipal Act, to consider:
- Adoption of Closed Minutes of Meetings held May 15, 2019
- Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; as it relates to liability issues for the County of Frontenac regarding joint services
- Labour relations or employee negotiations - as it relates to attendance management Resolved That Council rise from Committee of the Whole closed session with/without reporting Approval of Addendum a) Resolved That the Addendum for the June 19, 2019 meeting of the Council of the County of Frontenac be approved. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof
11 - 23
Adoption of Minutes a) Minutes of Meeting held May 15, 2019 Resolved That the minutes of the regular Council meeting held May 15, 2019 be adopted. Deputations and/or Presentations
24 - 45
a)
Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and Mr. Matt Rennie will address Council
Page with respect to the Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium. [See Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer clause e)] 46 - 47
b)
Ms. Evonne Potts, President, Battersea Loughborough Lake Association, will address Council with respect to the Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium. [See Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer clause e)]
Proclamations Move into Committee of the Whole a) That Council adjourn and meet as Committee of the Whole Council, with the Deputy Warden in the Chair.
48 - 76
Briefings a) Mr. Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer, will provide Council with his monthly CAO briefing. Unfinished Business
77 - 88
89 - 328
Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a) Consultant Briefing: Ms. Nadia De Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the Committee of the Whole with respect to the Communal Services Study. [See Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer clause b)] b)
2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the Communal Services Study dated June 2019; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to:
- Present an overview of the recommendations of the communal services study to each of the four Township Councils;
- Initiate before the end of 2019 an Official Plan Amendment to the County Official Plan to recognize that development on communal services for residential, commercial, and industrial land use can
Page 2 of 437
Page
329 - 345
c)
be applied across the entire Frontenac region; 3. Investigate financial models and utility models that can be used to significantly reduce the municipal financial risk of approving development on communal services and entering into a Municipal Responsibility Agreements (MRA) and report back to Council; and 4. Research funding opportunities from the Provincial and Federal Governments that can be used for new communal services, in particular communal services in existing villages and hamlets. 2019-063 Planning and Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development - Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision - 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac County File #10T-2011/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of subdivision for 2292 Sands Road, Battersea, to July 17, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 17, 2013.
346 - 361
d)
2019-064 Planning and Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Cranberry Cove, to July 16, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 16, 2014.
362 - 382
e)
2019-065 Planning and Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Johnston Point – County File 10CD-2014/001
Page 3 of 437
Page Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the report titled Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Johnston Point – County File 10CD-2014/001; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Johnston Point, to June 28, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix A, approved by the Ontario Municipal Board June 28, 2016 and amended August 25, 2018. 383 - 392
f)
2019-068 Corporate Services Approval of a Strategic Asset Management Policy Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services -Approval of a Strategic Asset Management Policy report; And Further That the Clerk be authorized to bring forward a by-law later in the meeting to establish a formal Strategic Asset Management Policy attached to this report as Appendix A.
393 - 397
g)
2019-069 Emergency and Transportation Service Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental Recommendation That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Emergency and Transportation Services – Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac confirm that Option ____ is the intent of Motion #: 64-19.
398 - 399
h)
2019-070 Fairmount Home Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement Recommendation
Page 4 of 437
Page Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for recommendation the Fairmount Home – Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac adopt the Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement as an integral part of operational practice, to be made known to every employee and volunteer, and to be made readily available to every staff member and volunteer for consistent reference and consultation. 400 - 411
i)
2019-071 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 attached to this report as Appendix A.
412 - 417
j)
2019-072 Planning and Economic Development Natural Heritage Policies in the County Official Plan - Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the report Planning and Economic Development – Natural Heritage Policies in the County Official Plan – Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac include the review of Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs) in the work plan for the County Official Plan update in 2020-2021.
418 - 420
k)
2019-073 Planning and Economic Development Request for Fencing and permission to plant trees along K&P Trail at Masonville Road. Recommendation Be It Resolved That staff be directed to enter into an agreement with Mr. James De Vries to permit Mr. DeVries to construct a 60m wood fence along the K&P Trail and Masonville Lane and to plant trees along
Page 5 of 437
Page the K&P Trail adjacent to the property located at 1006 Masonville Lane; And Further That the County provide 50% funding for fencing materials to a limit of One Thousand Dollars ($1000) to be funded from the 2019 K&P Trail Operating Budget.
421 - 432
Information Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a) 2019-067 Fairmount Home Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding Announcements for 2019-20 Funding Year Reports from Council Liaison Appointees a) Emergency and Transportation Services - Councillor Higgs b)
Long Term Care (Fairmount Home) - Councillor Martin
c)
Corporate Services - Councillor MacDonald
d)
Planning and Economic Development - Councillor Revill
Reports from External Boards and Committees a) Kingston Frontenac Library Board Update - Councillor Revill b)
KFL&A Public Health Board Update - Councillor Doyle
c)
Housing and Homelessness Committee Update - Deputy Warden Smith
d)
Food Policy Council of Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Councillor Higgs
Reports from Advisory Committees of County Council Return to Council a) That Council revert from Committee of the Whole Council, to Council.
Adoption of the Report of the Committee of the Whole Council a) That the report of the Committee of the Whole Council be adopted and that the necessary actions or by-laws be enacted. Motions, Notice of Which has Been Given a) Eastern Ontario Regional Network Mobile Broadband Project Moved by:Deputy Warden Smith Seconded by:Warden Higgins
Page 6 of 437
Page
Whereas on May 17, 2019 the Honourable Monte McNaughton, Minister of Infrastructure for the Province of Ontario officially announced confirmation of Ontario’s $71 million dollar contribution to the Eastern Ontario Regional Networks Mobile Broadband project; And Whereas nine separated municipalities including the cities of Kingston, Peterborough, Belleville, Cornwall and Quinte West and the Towns of Prescott, Gananoque, Pembroke, and Smiths Falls who represent a further 378,000 urban residents are supporting the project and have agreed to pay their portion of the $10 million local contribution; And Whereas the Eastern Ontario Wardens Caucus who represent 110 municipalities and 750,000 rural residents of the region have committed $10 million dollars as a local contribution towards the project; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Eastern Ontario Mayors’ Caucus calls upon the Federal Government to formally commit $71million dollars towards the Project and instruct Federal staff to begin discussions on the necessary contribution agreement(s), before the House of Commons rises in June; And Finally That all local Federal Members of Parliament be copied with this resolution and seek their support to work with the EOWC and its partner municipalities to secure the Federal contribution. Giving Notice of Motion Communications That Council consent to the following communications of interest to Council listed below be received and filed: a) Letter from the Town of Aurora Regarding Motion (a) Mayor Mrakas; Regarding Response to Bill 108 the More Homes, More Choice Act [Distributed to Members of County Council May 25, 2019] b)
Letter from Municipal Engineers Association Regarding 2019 MEA Awards – Request for Nominations [Distributed to Members of County Council May 25, 2019]
c)
Letter from Fort Erie Ontario Regarding Issuance of Cannabis Licenses in Residentially Zoned Areas [Distributed to Members of County Council May 25, 2019]
d)
Letter from the Corporation of the Township of Bonnechere Valley Regard Resolution Number 19.083
Page 7 of 437
Page [Distributed to Members of County Council May 25, 2019] e)
Letter from the Government of Ontario Regarding E-Learning [Distributed to Members of County Council May 25, 2019]
f)
Letter from Lake of Bays to The Honourable Victor Fedeli Regarding Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
g)
Letter from Lake of Bays to Charlene Touzel, City Clerk Regarding Single-Use Plastic Straws [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
h)
Letter from The Town of Grimsby Administration Regarding Opposition to Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
i)
Letter from Grey County Regarding Resolution CW116-19 Related to Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
j)
Letter from The Town of Markham Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
k)
Letter from The Town of Fort Frances Regarding Resolution to Oppose Funding Cuts to Ontario Library Services - North [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
l)
Letter from The Town of Halton Hills Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
m)
Letter from The Regional Municipality of York Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
n)
Letter from the Township of Muskoka Lakes Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
o)
Letter from the Town of Georgina Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
p)
Letter from the City of Guelph Regarding Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 31, 2019]
q)
Letter from the Corporation of the Township of Norwich Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
r)
Letter from the Town of Newmarket Regarding Bill 108
Page 8 of 437
Page [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019] s)
Letter from the Town of Orangeville Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
t)
Letter from the City of Toronto Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
u)
Letter from the Township of North Frontenac Regarding Cannabis Communication Partnership with KFL&A Public Health [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
v)
Letter from the Ministry of Infrastructure Regarding Ontario Regulation 588-17 Asset Management Planning for Municipal [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]Infrastructure
w)
Letter from the Halton Region Regarding Bill 108 [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
x)
From the Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario acknowledging receipt of Council resolution on Health Care [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
y)
From Warden Higgins to Township of South Frontenac Councillors regarding resolution on Johnston Point [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
z)
From Wayne Orr in response to Warden Higgins request regarding South Frontenac Johnston Point resolution [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019]
aa) From Ross Sutherland, Councillor, South Frontenac response to Warden Higgin request regarding South Frontenac resolution on Johnston Point [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019] ab) From Doug Morey, Councillor, South Frontenac response to Warden Higgin request regarding South Frontenac resolution on Johnston Point [Distributed to Members of County Council June 7, 2019] ac)
From Ross Sutherland, Councillor, South Frontenac providing revised response to Warden Higgins request regarding South Frontenac resolution on Johnston Point [Distributed to Members of County Council June 8, 2019]
ad) Letter from Morrison Hershfield Limited Regarding Notice of Public Information Centre Wolfe Island Ferry and Docking Improvements [Distributed to Members of County Council June 14, 2019] ae) Southern Frontenac Community Services Invitation for the Annual General Meeting [Distributed to Members of County Council June 14, 2019]
Page 9 of 437
Page af)
Letter from the Corporation of the Municipality of South Huron Regarding 2019 Ontario Good Roads Association Combined Conference Resolution [Distributed to Members of County Council June 14, 2019]
ag) Email from the Town of Georgina Regarding Reducing Litter and Waste [Distributed to Members of County Council June 14, 2019] Other Business Public Question Period By-Laws – General By-laws and Confirmatory By-law a) First and Second Reading Resolved That leave be given the mover to introduce by-laws a) through c) that have been circulated to all Members of County Council and that by-laws a) through c) be read a first and second time. b)
Third Reading Resolved That by-laws a) through c) be read a third time, signed, sealed and finally passed. By-Laws
433
a)
To Adopt a Strategic Asset Management Policy [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0024]
434 - 435
b)
To Adopt a Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0025]
436 - 437
c)
To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings of County Council on June 19, 2019 [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0026]
Adjournment
Page 10 of 437
AGENDA ITEM #a)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL May 15, 2019 A regular meeting of the Council of the County of Frontenac was held in the Kingston Frontenac Rotary Auditorium at the County Administrative Office, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 and was called to order at 9:00 a.m. Regular business commenced at 9:30 a.m. There was a “Closed Meeting” of the Committee of the Whole from 9:00 am to 9:13 am. Present:
Warden Ron Higgins, Deputy Warden Fran Smith, Councillors Ron Vandewal, Denis Doyle, Bruce Higgs, Bill MacDonald, Gerry Martin and Alan Revill
Also Present:
County: Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Paul Charbonneau, Chief/Director of Emergency & Transportation Services Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development Lisa Hirvi, Administrator-Fairmount Home Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Marco Smits, Communications Officer Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement/GIS Richard Allen, Manager of Economic Development Gale Chevalier, Deputy Chief of Operations
Closed Session Motion #: 79-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Revill Councillor MacDonald
Resolved That Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole closed session as authorized under Section 239 of The Municipal Act, to consider:
- Adoption of Closed Minutes of Meeting held January 16, 2019
- Labour relations or employee negotiations - as it relates to the Labour Relations Strategy for upcoming negotiations with CUPE Local 2290 and OPSEU Local 462 Carried
Page 1115, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Motion #: 80-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Deputy Warden Smith
Resolved That Council rise from Committee of the Whole closed session without reporting Carried Approval of Addendum Motion #: 81-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Vandewal
Resolved That the addendum for the May 15, 2019 meeting of the Council of the County of Frontenac be approved. Carried Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were none. Adoption of Minutes a)
Minutes of Meeting held April 17, 2019
Motion #: 82-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Vandewal
Resolved That the minutes of the regular Council meeting held April 17, 2019 be adopted. Carried b)
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Council held April 17, 2019
Motion #: 83-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor MacDonald Councillor Revill
Resolved That the minutes of the Special meeting held April 17, 2019 be adopted. Carried Deputations and/or Presentations
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1215, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 2 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Proclamations Move into Committee of the Whole Motion #: 84-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Martin Councillor Higgs
That Council adjourn and meet as Committee of the Whole Council, with the Deputy Warden in the Chair. Carried Briefings a)
Mr. Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer, provided Council with his monthly CAO briefing.
b)
Mr. Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development, provided County Council with a briefing regarding the communal services study. Unfinished Business Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer
a)
2019-054 Emergency and Transportation Services Howe Island County Ferry – School Bus Pilot
Motion #: 85-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Councillor Doyle
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Emergency and Transportation Services – Howe Island County Ferry – School Bus Pilot report for information, And Further That Council direct staff to implement a one (1) month pilot project commencing on June 3, 2019 on the County operated ferry to Howe Island wherein school bus are not given priority over other vehicles during peak periods, And Further That staff report back to Council the results of the pilot in July 2019. Lost
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1315, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 3 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
b)
2019-057 Planning and Economic Development 2019 Partnership Fund Grants from Regional Tourism Organization 9 (RTO9)
Motion #: 86-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Vandewal Councillor Revill
That County Council receive the Planning and Economic Development – 2019 Partnership Fund Grants from Regional Tourism Organization 9 (RTO9) report for information; And Further That the Warden and Clerk be authorized to complete necessary paperwork associated with RTO 9 funding. Carried c)
Consultant Briefing: Mr. Rob Wood, 8020 Info Inc. briefed the Committee of the Whole on the Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022. [See Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer, clause d)]
d)
2019-058 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022
Motion #: 87-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor MacDonald Councillor Martin
Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 20192022 report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 attached to this report as Appendix A. And Further that the consultant be directed to incorporate in the final plan comments provided by Council, specifically on clearer emphasis on funding sources, finding efficiencies and transportation. Carried as Amended (See motion to amend below which was Carried)
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1415, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 4 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Motion to Amend Motion #: 88-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Vandewal
Be It Resolved That the motion be amended to add the following: And Further that the consultant be directed to incorporate in the final plan comments provided by Council, specifically on clearer emphasis on funding sources, finding efficiencies and transportation. Carried Council recessed at 10:41 a.m. Council reconvened at 10:52 a.m. e)
2019-059 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Authorization to Engage Architectural Expertise to Review the County Administration Building
Motion #: 89-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Higgs
Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Authorization to Engage Architectural Expertise to Review the County Administration Building report; And Further That staff be authorized to engage appropriate architectural expertise to review and determine the feasibility and costs to redevelop the County Administration Building to accommodate County of Frontenac and Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Administrative staff to an upset of $10,000 to be expensed from the County’s Modernization Funds. And Further That the scope of the assignment, including life cycle costs include:
- architectural analysis of the County Administration Office “old house”,
- preliminary conceptual/schematic floor plans to meet partner needs,
- options for potential configuration of common spaces for best efficiencies,
- implications for parking, water & similar services, building code etc,
- Initial budget-level estimates for comparison with stand-alone option for the County. Carried Information Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a)
2019-055 Fairmount Home Quarterly Update Activity Report
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1515, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 5 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
b)
c)
2019-056 Fairmount Home Strategic Plan Progress Report 2019-061 Emergency and Transportation Services 2019 Land Ambulance Funding Letter from MOHLTC Reports from Council Liaison Appointees
a)
Emergency and Transportation Services - Councillor Higgs
Councillor Higgs provided an overview of the Emergency and Transportation Services liaison activities since the last Council Meeting. b)
Long Term Care (Fairmount Home) - Councillor Martin
Due to circumstances, Councillor Martin was unable to attend this meeting. c)
Corporate Services - Councillor MacDonald
Councillor MacDonald provided an overview of the Corporate Services liaison activities since the last Council meeting. d)
Planning and Economic Development - Councillor Revill
Councillor Revill provided an overview of the Planning and Economic Development liaison activities since the last Council meeting. Reports from External Boards and Committees a)
Kingston Frontenac Library Board Update - Councillor Revill
Councillor Revill provided an overview of the Kingston Frontenac Library Board activities since the last Council meeting. b)
KFL&A Public Health Board Update - Councillor Doyle
Councillor Doyle provided an overview of the Kingston, Frontenac Lennox and Addington Board of Health activities since the last Council meeting. c)
Housing and Homelessness Committee Update - Deputy Warden Smith
No Report.
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1615, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 6 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
d)
Food Policy Council of Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Councillor Higgs
Councillor Higgs provided an overview of the Food Policy Council, Kingston, Frontenac Lennox and Addington activities since the last Council meeting. Reports from Advisory Committees of County Council a)
Report of the Planning Advisory Committee All items listed on the Planning Advisory Committee Report shall be the subject of one motion. Any member of County Council may ask for any item(s) included in the Planning Advisory Committee Report to be separated from that motion and considered separately, whereupon the Planning Advisory Committee Report without the separated item(s) shall be put to the vote and the separated item(s) shall be considered immediately thereafter.
Motion #: 90-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Vandewal Warden Higgins
That the Report received from the Planning Advisory Committee be received and adopted. Report of the Planning Advisory Committee The Planning Advisory Committee reports and recommends as follows:
- Deputation by Mr. Darwyn Sproule regarding Township of North Frontenac citizen concerns over Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI). That Council directs planning staff to prepare a report for the June 2019 County Council meeting that:
- Provides rationale for the inclusion of Regional and Provincial Significant ANSIs in the County Official Plan; and
- Provides an overview of the process for an Official Plan Amendment including the Planning Act framework and the anticipated timelines.
- 2019-049 Planning Advisory Committee Application for Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium Approval 10CD2016/001 located at Part of Lots 15, 16 & 17, Concession 9, Geographic Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (Shield Shores) Whereas an application has been filed with the County of Frontenac for a Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium located at Part of Lots 15, 16 & 17, Concession 9, Geographic Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac;
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1715, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 7 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee and the Council of the County of Frontenac considered all written and oral submissions received on this application, the effect of which helped the Council of the County of Frontenac make an informed decision; And Whereas the application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), conforms to the Frontenac County Official Plan, Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, will comply with the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law, and has been reviewed in accordance with the criteria of Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act. Therefore Be It Resolved That the Planning Advisory Committee receive the Planning Advisory Committee – Application for Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium Approval 10CD-2016/001 located at Part of Lots 15, 16 & 17, Concession 9, Geographic Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (Shield Shores) report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the proposed 10CD-2016/001 vacant land condominium development, including Draft Conditions of Approval attached to this report as Appendix A. 3. 2019-051 Planning Advisory Committee Authorization of Delegated Authority to the Director of Planning and Economic Development for Part Lot Control Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning Advisory Committee – Delegated Authority for Part Lot Control – Amendment to Bylaw No. 2016-0006 Delegation of Authority Policy report for information; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize delegated authority to the Director of Planning and Economic Development for part lot control and amend the plans of subdivision and plans of condominium authorization wording. And Further That By-law 2016-0006 being a by-law to establish a Delegation of Authority Policy and to authorize the delegation of certain powers and duties under the Municipal Act, 2001, the Planning Act and other Acts be amended accordingly. Carried Return to Council Motion #: 91-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Revill Councillor MacDonald
That Council revert from Committee of the Whole Council, to Council. Carried Deputy Warden Smith stayed in the Chair
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1815, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 8 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Adoption of the Report of the Committee of the Whole Council Motion #: 92-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Vandewal Councillor Doyle
That the report of the Committee of the Whole Council be adopted and that the necessary actions or by-laws be enacted. Carried Motions, Notice of Which has Been Given a)
2019 Budget Issue
Motion #: 93-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Warden Higgins Councillor Vandewal
That the Rural Urban Liaison Advisory Committee (RULAC) be resurrected to ensure continued dialogue of matters that concern both the County and the City. Carried Warden Higgins took the Chair b)
County of Frontenac affirmation of support for KFL&A Public Health
Motion #: 94-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Deputy Warden Smith
Whereas evidence shows local public health agencies provide essential programs and offer an average return on investment of $14.3 for every $1 spent. Thus a $200 million investment would save approximately $2.86 billion in future costs on areas related to less ER visits, lower hospital night stays, Paramedic calls, Doctor visits and etc. Thus it follows that a $200 million cut in the public health budget will result in a $2.86 billion increase in costs; and Whereas local public health agencies aggressively work on saving the health system money by reducing hallway medicine through many key public health programs and actions including harm reduction services, and vaccinations which is at a rate of 98.6%, equating to every dollar invested in immunization, saves the health care system $16 in cost; and this reduces hallway medicine; and Whereas the Province has frozen for several years its contribution to the KFL&A and the more rural public health units budget causing many municipalities to support inflationary increases and creating a 60/40 split between provincial and municipal funding, these proposed downloads would raise the municipal portion to well over 50% to maintain the current service levels mandated by the Province. Thus resulting in significant layoffs resulting in cuts in service and taking drastic measures like closing remote rural offices, and getting out of septic system inspections. Coupled with proposed Paramedic changes which could result in closing small rural Paramedic
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 1915, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 9 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Stations we will end up with a lot of ghost towns across Rural Ontario as people will not want to live there with these service reductions; and Whereas local public health agencies agree that efficiencies may be gained by combining smaller Health Units, the proposed changes by the Province to create 10 Provincial Health Hubs would cause unnecessary and negative unintended consequences resulting in a new region that would cover over 100 municipalities making it impossible to have effective representation of the property tax payers resulting in Taxation without Representation for both Public Health and Paramedic operations, specifically in rural municipalities; and, Whereas the Board of KFL&A Public Health and the Medical Officer of Health are working in collaboration with the Association of Local Public Health Agencies and have asked for support from municipal partners in maintaining the current level of service provided by our local public health agency: Therefore Be It Resolved That the County of Frontenac affirm its support for KFL&A Public Health and its dedicated staff; And Further That the County of Frontenac request the Province of Ontario maintain and augment the health protection and prevention mandate of KFL&A, maintain the current 75 percent provincial, 25 percent municipal funding formula for KFL&A Public Health; And Further That the County of Frontenac request the Province of Ontario stop the planned reduction of Ontario public health units from 35 to 10 and planned reduction of $200 million from public health, and instead initiate consultations with municipalities and public health agencies on the public health system in Ontario; And Further That a copy of this motion be shared with the Honourable Doug Ford, Premiere of Ontario, the Honourable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Ian Arthur, MPP Kingston and the Islands, Randy Hillier, MPP LanarkFrontenac-Kingston, and Daryl Kramp, MPP Hastings-Lennox and Addington. Carried as Amended (See motion to amend below which was Carried) Motion to Amend Motion #: 95-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Revill
Be It Resolved That the motion be amended to include in the final clause the Honourable Doug Ford, Premiere of Ontario and the Honourable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Carried
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 2015, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 10 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Giving Notice of Motion Communications That Council consent to the following communications of interest to Council listed below be received and filed: a)
b) c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i) j)
k)
l) m) n)
From the City of Brantford providing Resolution regarding Single-Use Plastic Straws [Distributed to Members of County Council April 19, 2019] Letter from Allan and Partners regarding the Audit preformed for 2018 [Distributed to Members of County Council April 19, 2019] From the Town of Minto providing resolution regarding the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund [Distributed to Members of County Council April 19, 2019] Resolution from Mississippi Mills regarding Regionally Appropriate Agricultural Mapping [Distributed to Members of County Council April 26, 2019] From the Kingston Frontenac Housing Corporation providing April 29, 2019 Board Package [Distributed to Members of County Council April 26, 2019] Letter from Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding Ontario’s Housing Supply Action Plan [Distributed to Members of County Council May 3, 2019] Letter from the Office of the Regional Chair Regarding the Overview of Health System Transformation – A Region of Peel Perspective [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Letter from OGRA Regarding the 2019 Ontario Roads Association Conference [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Letter from the Township of McKeller Regarding Resolution 19-263 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Resolution from the Township of MulMur Regarding Motion #78-19 HawkinsClark [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Resolution from the Township of MulMur Regarding Motion #83-19 BoxemCufaro [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Invitation for Warden Higgins to the Celebration of Giving [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Letter from the Township of ESSA Regarding Resolution #CW097-2019 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Resolution from the Township of North Frontenac Regarding Motion #260-19 [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019]
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 2115, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 11 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
o)
Letter form the Town of Mono Regarding Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) [Distributed to Members of County Council May 10, 2019] Other Business Public Question Period By-Laws – General By-laws and Confirmatory By-law
a)
First and Second Reading
Motion #: 96-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Councillor MacDonald
Resolved That leave be given the mover to introduce by-laws a) through c) that have been circulated to all Members of County Council and that by-laws a) through c) be read a first and second time. Carried b)
Third Reading
Motion #: 97-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Councillor MacDonald
Resolved That by-laws a) through c) be read a third time, signed, sealed and finally passed. Carried By-Laws a)
b)
c)
To Authorize the Warden and Clerk to Execute an Agreement with the Regional Tourism Organization 9 (RTO 9) for partnership funding for the Ferry by Foot Program [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0021] To amend By-law 2016-0006 to delegate certain powers and duties under the Planning Act to the Director of Planning and Economic Development (Part Lot Control) [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0022] To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings of County Council on May 15, 2019 [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0023]
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 2215, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Page 12 of 13
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Adjournment Motion #: 98-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Martin Councillor Doyle
That the meeting hereby adjourn at 11:23 a.m. Carried
Ron Higgins, Warden
Regular Meeting of Council Minutes May 15, 2019
Page 2315, of2019 437 Minutes of Meeting held May
Jannette Amini, Clerk
Page 13 of 13
Page 24Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
County Delegation: June 19, 2019 Meela Melnik-Proud and Matt Rennie
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Johnston Point: Request for Frontenac County to Deny Extension of Draft Plan Approval
Page 25Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Our Request: • The County has received the June 4, 2019 Township Council motion that voted strongly to defeat the Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium. • At the February 19, 2019 Township Council Meeting when the issue of the extension first came up, Mayor Vandewal “assured Council that he would not support any extension to the Johnston Point agreement at the County.” (Minutes, Township Council Meeting, February 19, 2019 )
AGENDA ITEM #a)
South Frontenac Township Council has recommended County Council not to grant an extension. We respectfully ask you to honor their request, and support and reinforce the Township’s position on the extension denial.
Page 26Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Our Common Goal: Protecting and restoring Johnston Point’s species at risk and its unique natural heritage environment, recognizing the inherent value of Johnston Point that will be irreversibly damaged through development • Provincially Significant Wetland • Provincially Significant Woodland • Provincially Significant Wildlife Habitat and Fish Habitat
• within the Frontenac Arch, a United Nations (UNESCO) World Biosphere Reserve • Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) identified and recommended for protection by the MNRF in 1993. • Habitat for six species at risk on the Ontario list which have been documented by independent assessments. The Township’s July 2015 peer review also noted suitable habitat for nine other species at risk that have not yet been independently assessed.
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Johnston Point is one of the richest and most significant representations of biodiversity and natural heritage features in Ontario
Page 27Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Our Common Legacy: Gavin Marshall in Delegation to Township Council, June 4, 2019: “I think we can all be proud of one of the most important legacies that we can leave is a sustainable environment for our kids and their kids." Matt Rennie in Conversation with Meela Melnik-Proud after the March 2015 Open House on Johnston Point:
and Matt Rennie
AGENDA ITEM #a)
“I look at old pictures of my grandfather holding the once plentiful whitefish that our lake cannot support anymore and wonder if my grandchildren will look back at pictures of me holding lake trout and ask “what kind of fish is that?" “
Page 28Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Our Position defended as participants to the OMB: We made a bid for party status at the April 2016 OMB to “request that the development be denied until such time that all recommendations from the Peer Review EIA as well as all regulations as set out in the ESA are met. Until then, … that this case be dismissed based on the fact that the 180-day clause invoked by the Developer specifically aimed at avoiding due process.” Melnik-Proud, OMB Submission, April 4, 2016
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Over 2400 people signed last year’s Petition calling for this development to stop for clearly outlined reason.
Page 29Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Our position on denying the extension against Magenta’s stated reasons as follows: • “The owner was required to execute an Overall Benefit Permit with MNRF …. only recently been issued.” • “Ongoing legal dispute … delayed in their ability to clear the other draft Plan conditions.” • “Economic benefits to the Township.” •
“The implementation of the recommendations in the supporting studies and the Overall Benefit Permit will serve to protect the natural heritage and Species at Risk Habitat.” Report to Council - Draft Plan Extension Johnston Point Plan of Condominium:
AGENDA ITEM #a)
We have made an extensive effort to provide common and expert knowledge and evidence to assist the Township in deciding that the reasons stated by Magenta do not warrant an extension of this Plan of Condominium.
• “Magenta Waterfront Development is now responsible to project manage.”
Page 30Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Reasonable Grounds for the County to Deny Extension: “We feel there is no logical explanation that we are aware of for failing to approve an extension.”
Warden Higgins, June 5, 2019
• Trust and credibility issues: o Multiple reports of unauthorized work all prohibited without a benefit permit. o No signing back of the Condominium Agreement in good faith.
• Benefit Permit o process o concept
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Warden Higgins re Johnston Point Extension
• Time Issues
Page 31Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
TIME ISSUES: THE REALITY IS MAGENTA HAS LONG-STANDING RESPONSIBILITY: “The reality is we haven’t had operational control or responsibility for this project until roughly late March.”
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Gavin Marshall, Township delegation June 4, 2019
• Magenta submitted the application for Plan of Condominium five years ago, June 2014. • Magenta appealed to the OMB on the Township’s failure to make a decision on the Plan of Condominium application within 180/120 days. • Magenta has had three years to meet their commitments as explicitly stated in the OMB ruling of June 28, 2016, and has failed to do so.
Page 32Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Trust and credibility issues. “We have crafted the Gold Standard for what environmentally sensitive, responsible and sustainable waterfront development must become … Environmental standards could not be more elevated. It is unfortunate and regrettable and deplorable that the project, and those standards have not been respected.” AGENDA ITEM #a)
Gavin Marshall, Township delegation June 4, 2019
Page 33Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
April 2016: Concerned residents reported heavy road construction and blasting initiated on Johnston Point immediately following the April 2016 OMB hearing without first seeking benefit permit authorization. May 2016 Township Johnston Point
Motion - development at
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Condition “5D. The owner shall confirm that MNRF have been consulted on all species at risk issues and that the recommendations from the MNRF included in any Benefit Permit, if issued, related to Gray Rat Snakes and Blandings Turtles or any other species at risk identified. 5E. That the Owner shall complete Whip Poor Will surveys to determine if they are present at the site and submit this information to the MNRF. ”
Page 34Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
March 2018: Concerned residents reported unauthorized vegetation removal in the 30 metre Environmental Protection Buffer. Melnik/Harmer Apr 2018 County Powerpoint and supporting documents
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Condition 5A: “the area within 30 metres of the highwater mark of a waterbody or wetland shall be maintained in a natural state for soil and vegetation.”
Page 35Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
June 2018 :
May 2018, Tony Fleming re Johnston Point ; Johnston Point Condo Agreement
AGENDA ITEM #a)
The Condominium Agreement came in response to the Township’s investigation of our report of shoreline vegetation removal. Township entered into that agreement specifically to have access to the property to monitor activity on site going forward. The agreement is registered under both Magenta and 1324789 0ntario Inc. Magenta is indicated as the signing authority. Magenta never signed the agreement back.
Page 36Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
February 2019: Concerned residents reported development and removal of vegetation in PSW with the installation of the walking bridge on Lot #6. This bridge is not clear spanning, and work was initiated on the bridge without any permits, including a building permit from the Township. Johnston Point Walking Bridge - Response to February 19 2019 Melnik-Proud Delegation
OMB Testimony of Developer’s Planner: “the bridge that will cross the island is not actually ‘development’ under the Provincial Policy Statement … the important factor is that the bridge that will cross from the mainland of Unit 6 to the island has to be a clear spanning bridge.”
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Condition “8C: “In recognition that access to open water of Long Bay from proposed Unit 6 is by way of an island within a wetland, a walking bridge be installed under the supervision of the Conservation Authority … to the satisfaction of the CRCA and the Township.”
Page 37Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
The Benefit Permit: Process • Legal delays • Time delays
• Inadequate assessments
Councillor Ruttan, response to Magenta’s June 4, 2019 delegation
AGENDA ITEM #a)
“You are having issues with not signing the site plan, issues with the benefit permit. Those are your issues, not ours .… I want to know whether or not this is true, that some degradation of the environment as the result of blasting and some other things that may have gone on. That to me is someone doing something and seeking permission after the fact. So from my standpoint there seems to be a real contradiction in… this Gold Standard you are adhering to.“
Page 38Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Common Knowledge of Species At Risk first reported September 2014 Ecological Services, 2014 EIA “No living threatened or endangered species were found at Johnston Point … Conclusion: In regards to threatened or endangered species, the development will be in compliance with the PPS, and policies of the South Frontenac Township OP.” Matt Rennie, September 2014:
AGENDA ITEM #a)
“In reading the Environmental impact Assessment, it doesn’t paint a realistic picture of the area. On a regular basis, we see much of the wildlife the EIA mentions there is ‘no evidence’ of. Just to name a few: an abundance of gray rat snakes, milk snakes, salamanders, ospreys, turtles, tree frogs and the list goes on and on contrary to what the assessment would lead you to believe.” Ecological Services Response to Wicklam and Rennie
Page 39Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Common Knowledge reported July 2015 that this development is in Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) identified for protection by the MNRF since 1993: Ecological Services, 2014 EIA “There are no ANSI’s with 120 m of the proposed development."
Matt Rennie, July 2015 County Open House:
AGENDA ITEM #a)
At the July 2015 County Open House Matt Rennie noted that this development is in ANSI (yellow stipple). It is a key designation missed in both the 2012 and the 2014 EIA.
Page 40Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
The Township’s July 2015 peer review of Environmental Assessment: Full and early awareness of the need to exercise caution in the face of uncertainty for natural heritage values and species at risk: •
•
Directly observed 3 species at risk and notes suitable habitat for 11 other species
responses to Johnston Point ESA
•Does not demonstrate there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions for significant wildlife habitat for threatened species … for the ANSI or the PSW. •Does not demonstrate development and site alteration in fish habitat will be in accordance with provincial and federal requirements. •Site alterations performed may have contravened the prohibitions of the Endangered Species Act. • At a minimum, the proposed development has the potential to result in long-term negative impacts to Blanding’s Turtle, Snapping Turtle and Gray Ratsnake …It is strongly recommended that the MNR be consulted prior to any further site alteration.”
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Directly reported species at risk to the MNRF, who then called for “the review of further documents and proposals for the condominium development to determine if an authorisation under the Endangered Species Act is required.” MNRF, Warren
EIA Peer_Review McIntosh-Perry July29_2015.pdf. “Summary of Conclusions …
Page 41Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
10 months after the McIntosh-Perry peer review, an Information Gathering Form was submitted. It delayed MNRF assessment until August 2016 - 5 months after the April 2016 road construction and blasting. Furthermore, the IGF was deemed inadequate by the MNRF.
MNRF assessment of IGF, issued to Ecological Services, August 2016 (received through FIPPA)
The developer’s biologist has never publicly identified living species at risk on the property. Yet, as stated by the developer’s lawyer, he had made “28” site visits prior to submitting the IGF to the MNRF. Alan Cohen, Soloway Wright re May 2016 Johnston Point
AGENDA ITEM #a)
“ MNRF has reviewed your May 25, 2016 submission of an Information Gathering Form … has determined that regulated habitat for Gray Ratsnake and general habitat for Blanding’s Turtle are both present on site at Johnston’s Point … the project, as currently proposed, will likely contravene sections 9 and 10 of the ESA (species and habitat protection) for both these species … additional information is required to complete MNRF’s assessment regarding Eastern Whippoorwill, Butternut and Bats… we strongly encourage the proponent to consider modifying the proposed project to avoid impacting species at risk.”
Page 42Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
5 THREATENED and ENDANGERED species documented by independent surveys, none of which had been identified in the EIAs and only two are mentioned in the benefit permit:
Bat Survey Report Johnston Point July 2017; Addendum to July 2017 Bat Survey Report Add a footer
19
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2017-06-29 WPW Survey Johnston Point
Page 43Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
The Benefit Permit: Concept • By definition, the overall benefit permit under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 is NOT for the purpose of protecting species at risk on Johnston Point.
Reason cited in Application for Extension
AGENDA ITEM #a)
• This Overall Benefit Permit is specifically to allow for threatened and endangered species on Johnston Point to be killed, harmed or harassed, or their habitat to be damaged or destroyed, in order for this development to proceed.
“The implementation of the recommendations in the supporting studies and the Overall Benefit Permit will serve to protect the natural heritage and Species at Risk Habitat.”
Page 44Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
Magneta has failed to fulfill their commitments as explicitly stated in the OMB ruling of June 28, 2016: • “Conditions of Draft Plan Approval will ensure that matters of Provincial interest as well as the public interest is appropriately addressed and duly safeguarded.” • “The Board acknowledges that the participants continue to have concerns about the risks posed by the development of Johnston Point to endangered species and the natural heritage environment.”
AGENDA ITEM #a)
• “Conditions of Draft Plan, such as Condition 5D and 5E serve to ensure that the necessary approvals and/or permissions are appropriately obtained.”
Page 45Mr.ofMatt 437Rennie will address Council with res… Ms. Meela Melnik-Proud and
“It is unfortunate and regrettable and deplorable that the project, and those standards have not been
Gavin Marshall, Magenta Principal, June 2019
“An extreme case of conflicting values – between species at risk conservation and residential development … On Johnston Point, the species and habitat loss will be absolute.” Gord Miller, former Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, December 2017 ER Statement Gord Miller
AGENDA ITEM #a)
respected.”
AGENDA ITEM #b)
RE: Johnston Point Inbox
x
Joe Gallivan JGallivan@frontenaccounty.ca
Jun 28, 2016, 12:37 PM
to me Hello, Ms. Potts, I would like to let you know that I have contacted Mr. Mike Keene of Fotenn Consulting (planner for the developer) with respect to your questions regarding construction activities on the Johnson Point lands. I can report as follows: – there has been construction taking place on the existing private gravel road that runs north-south through the peninsula. In particular there has been some digging and blasting taking place on the road to prepare for installation of underground power lines. – the biologist retained by the applicant continues to be on site and investigating species at risk. Included in this work is a whippoorwill inventory. – the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) are being continually updated by the biologist on the work taking place on the property. The developer is waiting for approval of a benefit permit prior to other works taking place on the property. Here is a link to the permit process: http://mnrsar.cat.webfeat.com/pages/MNR_SAR_STEP_BY_STEP_EN.aspx I hope this provides you with some answers to the current on-site activity. Please contact me by phone or email if you have other questions. Sincerely, Joe Gallivan MCIP Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie ON K0H 1S0 phone 613.548.9400 extension 350 fax 613.548.8460 email jgallivan@frontenaccounty.ca —–Original Message—-From: info@esolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:info@esolutionsgroup.ca] On Behalf Of evonne.potts@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:39 PM
Page 46Battersea of 437 Loughborough Lake Association, w… Ms. Evonne Potts , President,
AGENDA ITEM #b)
To: Joe Gallivan JGallivan@FRONTENACCOUNTY.CA Subject: Johnston Point Hello Joe, Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions yesterday. I would like to ask you who you feel is responsible for enforcing the conditions of approval. The township, the county, or both? Also how should these conditions be enforced? Site visitations? Or Are there other options? And finally, how often should a site visitation take place? I look forward to your reply and also hearing back from you on your email to Mike Keene regarding the current and most recent activies on Johnston Point. Respectfully, Evonne Potts evonne.potts@gmail.com 905-582-2216 ————————————Origin: http://www.frontenaccounty.ca/en/contacts/search.aspx?s=PI500vTWr7SIQLzOPlUscm1hQeQuAleQuAl ————————————This email was sent to you by evonne.potts@gmail.com through http://www.frontenaccounty.ca/.
Think about our environment. Print only if necessary. Confidential: This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the email immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosing, copying, distributing or using the content of this transmission is strictly prohibited.
Evonne Potts evonne.potts@gmail.com
Jun 28, 2016, 1:30 PM
to Joe Thank you Mr. Gallivan for your reply. During our conversation you had said that you were going to request an onsite visit with Mr. Keene and you felt confident that he would agree to one. Did you make this request and has the visit been scheduled? Also I would like to know who you feel is responsible for enforcing the conditions of approval. Should it be the township, the county or both? And how should the conditions be enforced?
Page 47Battersea of 437 Loughborough Lake Association, w… Ms. Evonne Potts , President,
June 19, 2019 Report 2019-6
Page 48 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Administrative Report
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Page 49 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
CAO Schedule • • • • • • • •
EOWC Meeting, May 24, Picton Civility in the Workplace “Mastering the Incivility Challenge” Training by Bar-David Consulting, May 27, 2019, Auditorium Paramedic Services Week May 26 to June 1, 2019 (BBQ) Dale Hodgins Medal Presentation May 29, 2019 EOLC Meeting, May 30, 2019, County of Frontenac County Council, June 19, Auditorium RULAC June 26, County, Frontenac Room EOWC CAO’s meeting, June 27, Hawkesbury
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 50 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
EOWC Update N E W S R E L E AS E
Productive discussion betw een EOWC and Eastern Ontario Provincial MPPs P i c t o n , M a y 2 7 , 2 0 1 9 – Me m b e r s o f t h e E a s t e r n O n t a r i o W a r d e n s ’ C a u c u s ( E O W C ) h e l d a c o n s t r u c t i v e m e e t i n g wi t h t h e i r p r o v i n c i a l c o u n t e r p a r t s l a s t F r i d a y , Ma y 2 4 , t o d i s c u s s i s s u e s o f i n t e r e s t f o r E a s t e r n O n t a r i o s u c h a s a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g , h e a l t h care, emergency services, and financial impacts on municipal service delivery . Th e m e e t i n g , c o - h o s t e d b y E O W C C h a i r A n d y L e t h a m a n d MP P To d d S m i t h ( a l s o Mi n i s t e r o f E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t , J o b C r e a t i o n a n d Tr a d e ) , i s a n a n n u a l g a t h e r i n g o f P r o v i n c i a l MP P s a n d t h e h e a d s o f C o u n c i l f r o m a c r o s s t h e r e g i o n . “ I wo u l d l i k e t o t h a n k o u r P r o v i n c i a l MP P s f o r t h e i r p r e s e n c e a n d i n t e r e s t i n o u r r e g i o n ’ s g r o wt h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t , ” s t a t e d C h a i r L e t h a m . “ Th e E O W C r e c o g n i z e s t h e P r o v i n c e ’ s s u p p o r t f o r o u r n u m b e r - o n e p r i o r i t y , b e i n g t h e i m p r o v e m e n t a n d e xp a n s i o n o f t h e c e l l u l a r a n d m o b i l e b r o a d b a n d n e t wo r k s i n E a s t e r n O n t a r i o , a n d t h a n k s o u r MP P s f o r t h e i r e f f o r t s i n s e c u r i n g t h e P r o v i n c e ’ s $71-million contribution to the project.” Th e m e e t i n g p r o v i d e d a n o p p o r t u n i t y f o r t h e E O W C t o u p d a t e t h e MP P s o n i t s r e c e n t a d v o c a c y wo r k , i n c l u d i n g s u b m i s s i o n s t o t h e P r o v i n c e o n r e d - t a p e r e d u c t i o n s a n d r e g u l a t o r y b u r d e n s f o r a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g a n d l o n g - t e r m c a r e . Th e W a r d e n s a l s o highlighted the impacts of the Province’s recent budget amendments on municipal service delivery, including paramedic services, child care, Ontario W orks, and public health units. “W e realize that the Province of Ontario has set important efficiency goals for itself and for the municipal sector, in order to a c h i e v e s p e c i f i c f i n a n c i a l t a r g e t s i n t h e c o m i n g y e a r s , ” a d d e d C h a i r L e t h a m . “ Th e E O W C a c k n o wl e d g e s t h e g o v e r n m e n t ’ s i n t e n t i o n s , a n d t o d a y we r e i t e r a t e d t h e v a l u e a n d i m p o r t a n c e o f h a v i n g o u r v o i c e s a r o u n d t h e d i s c u s s i o n t a b l e – n a m e l y , t o p r o v i d e a l o c a l p e r s p e c t i v e t h a t i s we l l - r e s e a r c h e d a n d we l l - r e s p e c t e d . ” Th e W a r d e n s a s k e d f o r c l a r i t y o n t h e P r o v i n c e ’ s c u r r e n t p r i o r i t i e s , a n d s p e c i f i c a l l y h o w t h e E O W C c o u l d c o n t r i b u t e i t s u n i q u e insight on governance, structure and funding models.
- 30 For more information, contact: R o n Ta y l o r , S e c r e t a r y / Tr e a s u r e r , r t a y l o r @ k a wa r t h a l a k e s . c a J u s t i n B r o m b e r g , C o m m u n i c a t i o n s a n d P o l i c y C o o r d i n a t o r , i n f o @ e o wc . o r g
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
“ W e n e e d a v o i c e t o t r a n s i t i o n p r o p e r l y a n d b u d g e t a p p r o p r i a t e l y o v e r t h e n e xt f e w y e a r s , ” e xp l a i n e d W a r d e n R o b e r t K i r b y , o f t h e U n i t e d C o u n t i e s o f P r e s c o t t a n d R u s s e l l . “ L o c a l m u n i c i p a l t a xp a ye r s a r e c o n t r i b u t i n g t o p r o g r a m a n d s e r vi c e d e l i ve r y, a n d we l o o k f o r wa r d t o wo r k i n g wi t h t h e P r o v i n c e o n a c h i e v i n g i t s g o a l s wh i l e m a i n t a i n i n g t h e q u a l i t y o f o u r s e r v i c e s f o r t h e residents of rural Eastern Ontario.”
Page 51 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
May 24, 2019 Resolution: Development of a RFP to engage a consultant to undertake a comprehensive study of Eastern Ontario Paramedic Services MOVED BY: Warden Ron Higgins (County of Frontenac) SECONDED BY: Warden Liz Danielsen (County of Haliburton)
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the EOWC authorize the development of a two-part Request for Proposals (RFP) to engage a consultant to undertake a comprehensive study of Eastern Ontario Paramedic Services in order to better inform the ongoing Provincial discussions on health care reform; AND THAT the first phase of the study will be to collect data and key background information and will be funded through the existing EOWC budget, including any reserves; AND FURTHER THAT the second phase of the study will be to examine governance/operation models, if deemed necessary after the completion of the first phase, and will be funded through additional financial contributions from each EOWC member municipality.
Signed by: Andy Letham, Chair Picton, Ontario May 24, 2019
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CARRIED
Page 52 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Health Unit Levy (Required to maintain same level of service) 2019: $2.53 million
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2020: $3.57 million
Page 53 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Changes to Child Care Funding (Operations / Administration) 2019: $2.60 million
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2020: $3.34 million
Page 54 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Changes to Child Care Funding (Expansion Funding) 2019: $2.12 million
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2020: $2.45 million
Page 55 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Changes to Ontario Works (Allowance / Performance Targets) 2019: $2.54 million
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2020: $3.20 million
Page 56 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Paramedic Services 2019: $3.75 million
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
2020: $4.68 million
Page 57 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Impact of Provincial Budget on the EOWC for 2019 and 2020 Total 2019: $13.54 million
Total 2020: $17.23 million AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 58 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
EOLC Update • •
May 13/19 EOLC meeting – held at Frontenac County – Chaired by EOLC Co-Chair Higgins Reviewed approved the three business plans for the working groups: Innovation, transportation and workforce development
• •
Implementation to proceed for the next 18 months with key performance indicators (KPIs) be developed Continue to support EORN and the cellular/broadband initiatives
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 59 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Bill 108 – AMO Policy Update June 7, 2019 Bill 108 Receives Royal Assent with Several Amendments
Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 has now passed third reading at Queen’s Park and received Royal Assent. It is now law in Ontario. The Act makes significant changes to the planning appeals process and to development charges. It also introduces a new Community Benefit Charges (CBC) under the Planning Act and makes changes to the planning process, conservation authorities, endangered species legislation, environmental assessments and to the Ontario Heritage Act.
•
AMO advocated vigorously on behalf of municipal interests throughout the legislative process, including by presenting before the Standing Committee of Justice Policy, and through our government relations work. A few amendments were introduced during the committee stage, including one that AMO and others proposed on including capital costs for ambulance services in development charges calculations .
•
Bill 108 will require numerous regulations for implementation. Draft regulations generally involve public consultations. AMO will continue to advocate for meaningful municipal involvement in Bill 108 regulations
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
•
Page 60 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Bill 108 – AMO Policy Update Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act: • Despite calls from AMO and municipal governments to allow the LPAT to continue to evaluate appeals based on compliance and conformity, de novo hearings will now be re-introduced. This move will take authority away from local councils and reverts back to an appeals process known to have a legacy of delays. It is unclear how the return to de novo hearings will lead to the faster provision of affordable housing.
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Development Charges: • We believe that the new changes to development charges will negatively impact municipal finances and go against the principle that growth should pay for growth. If a development is rental housing, institutional, commercial or industrial, development charge payments are now payable to the municipality as six annual installments commencing at occupancy. An amendment to Bill 108 following committee extends the repayment timeframe to 20 years for non-profit housing. Previously, development charges were payable in advance. This change will reduce the amount of revenue municipalities receive from development charges. It will also increase administrative burden for municipal governments
Page 61 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Bill 108 – AMO Policy Update Community Benefit Charges: • Height and density bonusing under Section 37 of the Planning Act has been replaced with a new Community Benefit Charges framework. The CBC framework will allow municipal governments to pass by-laws covering a particular area to impose charges against land to pay for the cost of facilities, services and other matters required because of new development. Notably, costs eligible for development charges are excluded from CBCs. Eligible services and the methodology for calculating CBCs will be determined in regulation.
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Other Planning Act Changes: • Timelines for making decisions related to official plans are reduced from 210 to 120 days and from 150 days to 90 days for zoning by law amendments. Plans of subdivision are also sheltered from third party appeals. As well, the use of Inclusionary Zoning will now be limited to transit areas. This limits the utility of this affordable housing tool.
Page 62 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Bill 108 – AMO Policy Update Conservation Authorities: • The mandatory ‘core services’ of conservation authorities will now be prescribed by regulation. Conservation authorities must also now enter into agreements with municipal governments on service delivery. Municipal governments want assurance that this new regime will not only bring transparency to the financial relationship with Conservation Authorities but will continue to support reaching the ‘triple bottom line’. • •
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Endangered Species: Bill 108 also introduces a new approach to endangered species protection. Species at risk will now be considered in the broader geographic context when determining species’ status. The Minister is also now able to enter into landscape agreements that authorize activities that would otherwise be prohibited in relation to listed species under certain circumstances. As per an amendment to the bill, alternative approaches will need to be considered before undertaking an activity that could adversely affect a listed species. While this direction holds potential to protect species at risk, a strong commitment from the province is required to provide leadership and tools to make this a success.
Page 63 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Bill 108 – AMO Policy Update Environmental Assessment Act: • The Bill will reduce the need to undertake a lengthy justification for low risk activities. AMO looks forward to participating as further information, regulations and guidance are developed.
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Ontario Heritage Act: • Ontario Heritage Act changes will require municipal councils to notify property owners if their properties are included in the register due to cultural heritage value or interest. The changes also introduce new timelines aimed at making the heritage process more transparent. A technical amendment was made at the committee stage that the Trust is included in notices. The language around erecting structures on a heritage site was also clarified to stress that the attributes that give heritage significance should not be altered or demolished.
Page 64 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
AMCTO Bills and Lawmaking Private Member ’s Bills Debated
Bill 75, 9-1-1 Everywhere in Ontario Act, 2019 , which would require that the infrastructure for 9-1-1 calls be in place in all municipalities in Ontario. (Status: First Reading Carried)
•
Bill 78, Supporting Ontario’s Community, Rural and Agricultural Newspapers Act, 2019, which would allow that notices to be published in a community newspaper can be published at regular intervals of a month or less, rather than published at regular intervals of a week or less, as is currently the case. (Status: Ordered referred to the Standing Committee on Justice Policy).
•
Bill 80, Archives and Recordkeeping Amendment Act, 2019 , which would make it an offence to deprive a public body of the custody, control or use of or access to any public record of archival value. (Status: First Reading Carried )
•
Bill 86, Respecting Property Taxpayers Act, 2019 , which would increase the number of taxpayer representatives MPAC’s board from 4 to 7 and increase the total number of members of the board from 13 to 16. (Status: First Reading Carried )
•
Bill 88, Planning Amendment Act, 2019, which affects the ways in which individuals and other entities may deal with planning permissions. (Status: First Reading Carried)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
•
Page 65 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Job Swap May 20 - 26
Frontenac Paramedics was selected to take part in a Swiss TV show called Job Swap.
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Two Frontenac paramedics travelled to Switzerland and two Swiss paramedics worked here on calls in Kingston and Frontenac recently. The goal of the show was to have workers gather experience in their field on another continent and to engage in a cultural exchange.
Page 66 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Job Swap earned media highlights • TV: Global Kingston – Two appearances on Global TV Morning Show, one regular segment on 6 o’clock news • Radio: CBC Ontario Morning and CBC Ottawa Morning • Print and online: Two times front page The Kingston Whig Standard, Owen Sound Sun, Station 14 (Internet TV)
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 67 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Paramedic Services Week May 26 to June 1, 2019
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Warden Higgins and Mayor Paterson with paramedics at Springer Market Square in Kingston, Ontario on May 29
Page 68 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Dale Hodgins received the highest honour for paramedics in Canada; the Governor General Emergency Medical Services Exemplary Services Medal, 2nd Bar. It was presented to him on May 29, 2019 in Kingston by Honorary Lieutenant General Richard Heath Rohmer.
Page 69 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Staff Announcements – Frontenac Paramedics We are pleased to announce the appointments of Marc Goudie, Deputy Chief of Performance Standards and Heather Edward, Deputy Chief of Operations for Frontenac Paramedics. Goudie has been a paramedic since 2007 and became an Advanced Care Paramedic in 2009. He is currently the Acting Deputy Chief of Performance Standards and will now be in the position permanently. He has also been a Superintendent with Frontenac Paramedics and Alternate Paramedic Supervisor with Leeds Grenville Paramedic Services. He holds a Master of Health Management from McMaster University and a Master of Arts, Disaster and Emergency Management from Royal Roads University in Victoria, British Columbia.
•
Edward has been a paramedic since 1999 and became an Advanced Care Paramedic in 2004. She comes to Frontenac Paramedics from Toronto Paramedic Services where most recently she was the Superintendent of Operations/Education and the Acting Deputy Commander. She has a Master of Arts in Leadership from the University of Guelph and a Mini -MBA in Management Studies from the Christopher J. Rubes Centre for Paramedic Studies in Toronto.
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
•
Page 70 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Old House • Plumbing problems continue in the old house. May require excavation in the basement to clear or replace blockages. Cost TBD
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Page 71 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Butterfly Release June 2, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 72 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Communications Update Highlights • Global News includes Howe Island Ferry footage in local flooding coverage • Renewed and increased focus on user generated content on Instagram • Preparing for Instagram takeovers
Website traffic April • www.frontenaccounty.ca • www.infrontenac.ca • www.frontenacmaps.ca
19,501 page views Average time on page 1:31 6,873 page views Average time on page 2:13 4,647 page views Average time on page 4:02
Social media audience
Increase since April 30
May 31
3,480 2,347 722 4,274 513 884 12,220 184 followers
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
County Facebook County Twitter County Instagram FPS Twitter Fairmount Home Facebook Howe Island Ferry Twitter
Page 73 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
The Wolfe Island Visitor Guide is now available for distribution as part of our Ferry by Foot campaign.
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 74 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Wayfinding Signs Installed
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 75 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Engineering Underway
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
Page 76 of 437 Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative
Planning Update - June
Planning Highlights
10 9 8
8 7 6
5 4
4
3
2
2 1
0
1
North Frontenac
Central Frontenac
Committee of Adjustment
Frontenac Islands
Township Council
Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, June 19, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
0
0
- Attended OACA (Committee of Adjustment) Conference June 3rd -5th
- RFP for Marysville Secondary Plan to closes June 18th
- Draft of Central OP to CF Council June 20th
- Presenting to Chinese Delegates June 20th
- Special Meeting for North Frontenac Zoning Bylaw
- LPAT Hearing – Central Frontenac June 24th
77 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
County of Frontenac
Communal Services Study Council Meeting Presentation June 19, 2019 AGENDA ITEM #a)
Nadia De Santi, MCIP, RPP Senior Project Manager
78 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Outline 1
Overview of Project Schedule / the Study
2
Community Benefits of Communal Services
3
Key Takeaways
2
AGENDA ITEM #a)
79 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Project Schedule ENGAGEMENT EVENTS
April 13, 2018
Project Kick-Off Meeting
April 24, 2018
TAC Meeting
May 15, 2018
Developer Meeting
PROJECT PHASES & REPORTS
Phase 1: Official Plan Policy Development
Phases 2: Engineering Best Practices
Phase 3: Financial Planning / Modelling TAC Meeting
May 8, 2019
Developer Meeting
June 19, 2019
Council Presentation
We are here
Phase 4: The Study
May to July 2018
May to December 2018
July 2018 to June 2019
AGENDA ITEM #a)
May 8, 2019
April to May 2018
80 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
What are Communal Services? — Decentralized, or “communal”, drinking water and sewage systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of residences and businesses
4
AGENDA ITEM #a)
81 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Communal Services Study — Ground-breaking work — Presents the “servicing problem”, and why communal services are the right fit for the County — Provides a community overview, regulatory framework, and local planning context 5
— Outlines engineering best practices — Provides a financial model for risk mitigation AGENDA ITEM #a)
— Includes Draft Official Plan policies for future amendments to the County and Township Official Plans
82 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Community Benefits of Communal Services — Servicing options for hard-to-service areas — Increased development potential (e.g. infill, density, mixed use), helping to grow the tax base
6
— Broader range of housing types and commercial development towards complete communities, vibrant mainstreets, and aging in place — Greater public health and safety benefits than individual on-site systems (e.g. higher treatment standards)
AGENDA ITEM #a)
— Reduced potential nutrient loading impacts on lakes and waterbodies (e.g. in-building treatment and reuse systems for greywater recycling)
7
83 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Development Potential
AGENDA ITEM #a)
8
84 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Community Benefits of Communal Services…in the News
AGENDA ITEM #a)
85 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Key Takeaways — Draft Official Plan (OP) policies to: — Better enable development on communal services, to help achieve growth and (re)development objectives — Promote residential infilling, intensification, mainstreet development (i.e. commercial), and rural affordability 9
— Policy recommendations would be implemented through County and Township OP amendments, or as part of new OPs to be developed
AGENDA ITEM #a)
— e.g. “The Township shall encourage growth and development in the Settlement Areas, including mainstreets, to occur on communal services to revitalize the historic hamlets and provide opportunities for increased density and a mix of uses.”
86 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Key Takeaways — The engineering is there — Engineering best practices should be considered to mitigate concerns related to design, O&M, and environmental impact of communal systems: — Planning and design — Permitting 10
— Installation — Operation and Maintenance
— Financial Model to be used as a tool for estimating appropriate charges to cover anticipated annualized costs and mitigate financial risk
AGENDA ITEM #a)
— Monitoring (Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) will include minimum requirements)
11
87 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Questions / Comments
AGENDA ITEM #a)
88 of Consultant Briefing :Page Ms. Nadia De437 Santi, WSP Consulting, will brief the…
Thank you! AGENDA ITEM #a)
If you have comments or questions, please contact : Joe Gallivan Director Planning & Economic Development County of Frontenac jgallivan@frontenaccounty.ca
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Report 2019-074 Council Recommend Report To:
Warden and Council
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Joe Gallivan, Director, Planning & Economic Development
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Communal Services Study
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the Communal Services Study dated June 2019; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to:
- Present an overview of the recommendations of the communal services study to each of the four Township Councils;
- Initiate before the end of 2019 an Official Plan Amendment to the County Official Plan to recognize that development on communal services for residential, commercial, and industrial land use can be applied across the entire Frontenac region;
- Investigate financial models and utility models that can be used to significantly reduce the municipal financial risk of approving development on communal services and entering into a Municipal Responsibility Agreements (MRA) and report back to Council; and
- Research funding opportunities from the Provincial and Federal Governments that can be used for new communal services, in particular communal services in existing villages and hamlets.
Page 89 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Background Communal services are systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of residences or businesses. They can be a less expensive alternative to centralized municipal services and a more environmentally-friendly alternative to private on-site services. However, perceived obstacles have slowed the implementation of communal services in many jurisdictions. A key benefit of communal services is that they represent alternative water and wastewater servicing approaches that can provide the County and Townships with the innovative technology and flexibility to accommodate growth and achieve planning, environmental, and economic objectives. County Council supported the initiation of the Communal Services Study as part of the 2017 budget process. WSP Consulting was retained to prepare the Study. WSP employed a team comprised of planners, engineers, and financial risk analysts to create conditions that will support development on communal services throughout the region. WSP began work on the project in April, 2018 and met all of the project deadlines. The Study is attached as an Appendix to this report. Comment The main purpose of this Communal Servicing Study is to demonstrate that the perceived obstacles - engineering, financial, risk management, planning - are just that, and to equip Frontenac with the tools necessary to enable redevelopment and new development on the basis of communal services. Communal water and wastewater servicing offers the potential to allow for new development and infill across the County, including on village and hamlet mainstreets, addressing some of the challenges associated with centralized municipal services and with private on-site services. Most importantly, communal servicing has the potential to support more compact, landefficient development than is possible with private servicing, at a lower cost than is possible with centralized municipal services, and enable revitalization of the Frontenac’s communities. A Technical Advisory Committee was established to help guide the study and its recommendations. As well as County staff, members of the Committee were from the following organizations: • • • • • • •
South Frontenac Township Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit Frontenac County Planning Advisory Committee (one citizen member) WaterTAP (Ontario Water Technology Acceleration Project)
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Endorsement of Communal Services Study June 19, 2019
Page 90 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
Page 2 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Also, two meetings were held with developers who have experience building in Frontenac, including a meeting to review the final draft. The consensus from the development industry is that there is a strong market for residential housing built on communal services near existing villages - particularly in the southern half of Frontenac as well as potential for commercial and industrial business parks. As described in the Executive Summary of the Study, the implementation of development on communal services has many potential benefits for Frontenac. For the Frontenac region, communal servicing enables: • • • • •
Increased development potential, growing the tax base; More water-sensitive design and other approaches to meet sustainability objectives; A broader range of housing typologies and commercial development to allow for complete communities; Reduced municipal service delivery costs to residents (e.g. garbage collection, snow removal); and A new approach to managing financial risk.
For developers, communal servicing allows for more: • • •
Flexibility to address different market segments; Feasible servicing approaches for developments in hard-to-service areas; and Guidance and certainty on servicing.
And citizens that have the potential to reside in a communal service neighbourhood can: • • •
Be confident in their water and wastewater treatment systems; Have a wider choice of housing options, allowing for aging in place; and Be confident that water resources are being appropriately stewarded.
Should Council endorse the Study, staff will begin the next stage of implementation including consultation with the Townships, reviewing best practices for financial risk management and possible utility operation, investigate Federal and Provincial funding opportunities, and the implementation of a County Official Plan Amendment that will support the creation of new development on communal services. Sustainability Implications The potential outcomes of Communal Services Study touch on all four pillars of the County sustainability plan (Directions for Our Future): social, cultural, economic, and environmental. Financial Implications None at this time. Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Endorsement of Communal Services Study June 19, 2019
Page 91 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
Page 3 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Frontenac County (Finance, Planning, Chief Administrative Officer) South Frontenac Township (Planning, Public Works) Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Endorsement of Communal Services Study June 19, 2019
Page 92 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
Page 4 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
2611 QUEENSVIEW DRIVE SUITE 300 OTTAWA, ON K2B 8K2 T: 613.829.2800
Page 93 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
JUNE 2019
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
JUNE 2019
PREPARED FOR: COUNTY OF FRONTENAC JOE GALLIVAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 T: 613.548.9400 x350
Page 94 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
PREPARED BY: WSP 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON K2B 8K2 T: 613.690.1114 E: Nadia.De-Santi@wsp.com
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The County of Frontenac extends their appreciation to the members of the Technical Advisory Committee listed below for their support, time, and expertise in the preparation of this Study. Their passion and stewardship of the Study will be instrumental in driving change, while building great communities in the County and in the Townships. Members of the Technical Advisory Committee: Susan Brant, County of Frontenac Claire Dodds, Township of South Frontenac Mike Elms, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Katrina Furlanetto, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Joe Gallivan, County of Frontenac Jim McIntosh, Planning Advisory Committee Member, County of Frontenac Gord Mitchell, Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Health Unit Trish Johnson, Environmental Consultant Jon Orpana, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Kelly Pender, County of Frontenac Megan Rueckwald, County of Frontenac Mark Segsworth, Township of South Frontenac
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 95 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 96 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ……………………………………….. IV 1
INTRODUCTION ………………………………………….. 1
1.1
The Servicing Problem …………………………………………3
1.2
What are Communal Services? ……………………………..4
1.3
Why are Communal Services the Right Fit for the County of Frontenac? …………………………………………..6
1.4
Study Purpose …………………………………………………..12
2
COMMUNITY OVERVIEW …………………………… 12
2.1
Demographic Trends ………………………………………….12
2.2
Land Use ………………………………………………………….14
2.3
Historic Villages and Mainstreets ………………………….17
2.4
Housing ……………………………………………………………18
2.5
Environment and Natural Heritage ………………………..19
2.6
Climate Change and Risk ……………………………………20
3
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ……………………. 21
3.1
Legislative and Regulatory Implications for Communal Servicing ………………………………………………………….24
4
EXISTING LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT ……. 25
4.1
The Role of Conservation Authorities ……………………25
4.2
Official Plan Review ……………………………………………26
4.3
Summary ………………………………………………………….31
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 97 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page i
AGENDA ITEM #b)
5
COMMUNAL SERVICES BEST PRACTICES … 32
6
ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES ……………… 35
7
FINANCIAL MODEL AND RISK MITIGATION .. 35
7.1
Assumptions ……………………………………………………..36
7.2
Methodology ……………………………………………………..37
8
CONCLUSION …………………………………………… 43
TABLES Table 7-1: Financial Model User Inputs Required…………….. 38 Table 7-2: Example Communal System Catastrophic Failure Likelihood and Risk Tolerance ……………………………………… 40
FIGURES Figure 1-1: County of Frontenac Key Map ………………………… 2 Figure 1-2: Different types of servicing systems ………………… 5 Figure 1-3: Subdivision Development Potential on Individual Servicing ………………………………………………………….. 10 Figure 1-4: Subdivision Development Potential on Communal Servicing ………………………………………………………….. 11 Figure 2-1: Allocation of Permanent Population Growth in the County of Frontenac by Municipality, 2011-2036……………… 13 Figure 2-2: Settlement Areas in the County of Frontenac ….. 15 Figure 2-3: Approximate boundaries for Snow Road Station Settlement Area in North Frontenac (left) and Sydenham Settlement Area in South Frontenac (right) …………………….. 16 Figure 2-4: Verona Mainstreet, circa 1930 (Jeff Green, Frontenac News, 2015) ……………………………………………….. 17 Figure 2-5: County of Frontenac Crown Land, Figure #2 Crown Land, County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016 ………. 19 Figure 2-6: Big Salmon Lake in Frontenac Provincial Park (CC 2.0 Ted Goldring, 2006) ………………………………………………. 20 Figure 3-1: Regulatory approvals process for a hypothetical communal wastewater system ……………………………………… 23
WSP June 2019 Page ii
Page 98 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Figure 4-1: Key Map of Conservation Authorities within County of Frontenac……………………………………………………. 25 Figure 5-1: Example of emerging wastewater treatment technologies, PhytoLinksTM Modular Floating Treatment Wetland System for stormwater and wastewater applications (TerrapinWater)………………………………………………………….. 34 Figure 7-1: Logarithmic vs. Linear Scale ………………………… 39
APPENDICES A
Federal and Provincial Regulatory Framework
B
County and Townships Planning Context
C
Draft Official Plan Policies
D
Engineering Best Practices
E
Engineering Best Practices - Attachments
F
Financial Model Sample Outputs
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 99 of 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Development Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page iii
AGENDA ITEM #b)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The County of Frontenac’s permanent and seasonal populations are projected to grow over the next 20 years. With population growth comes development pressures and the need to consider where and how development can be accommodated and serviced, while maintaining and enhancing the vitality and livability of the County’s villages and hamlets as rural community hubs with a distinct sense of place. Existing approaches to water and wastewater servicing constrain the County’s potential for growth. The cost of providing or expanding municipal water and wastewater services to all rural areas is not a fiscal reality for most municipalities. Development on private individual on-site services inherently results in lower forms of density, due to the spatial requirements associated with well and septic treatment systems, and associated separation distances. Continued development in the County on private services has the potential to result in inefficient use of land, and threaten the long-term viability of the County’s villages and hamlets, especially their mainstreets. Without innovative approaches to servicing, the County and developers are limited in their ability to respond to community needs in the provision of diverse housing types along the housing spectrum to enable residents to age in place. Development on smaller lot sizes could assist in addressing increasing concerns related to rural housing affordability and accessibility. Private servicing also limits the revitalization of village and hamlet mainstreets and commercial cores to be vibrant, walkable, and compact, and able to accommodate new commercial and mixed-use development. Communal services are systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of residences or businesses. They can be a less expensive alternative to centralized municipal services and a more environmentally-friendly alternative to private on-site services. However, perceived obstacles have slowed the implementation of communal services in many jurisdictions. A key benefit of communal services is that they represent alternative water and wastewater servicing approaches that can provide the County and Townships with the innovative technology and flexibility to accommodate growth and achieve planning, environmental, and economic development objectives. The fundamental purpose of this Communal Servicing Study (“the Study”) is to demonstrate that the perceived obstacles are just that, and to equip the County of Frontenac with the planning, engineering, and economic development tools necessary to enable redevelopment and new development on the basis of communal services. Communal water and wastewater servicing offers the potential to enable new development and infill across the County, including on village and hamlet mainstreets, addressing some of the challenges associated with centralized municipal services and with private on-site services. Most importantly, communal servicing has the potential to support more compact, land-efficient development than is possible with private
WSP June 2019 Page iv
Page 100 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
servicing, at a lower cost than is possible with centralized municipal services, and enable revitalization of the County’s communities. The type of communal services treatment and disposal system that is chosen to service a development depends on many factors, including site soil characteristics, the presence of surface water features close to the site, design sewage flows, raw sewage strength, and effluent requirements. This Study includes Engineering Best Practices that provide a guideline for the planning, selection, and design of a communal on-site sewage treatment and disposal system, as well as best practices for installation, operation, and maintenance. These best practices are not intended to be all-inclusive and require professional judgement in their use. For all sewage systems, appropriate government approvals will be required prior to construction and/or use of the system. An Excel-based cashflow Financial Model was developed to be used by the County as a tool for estimating appropriate charges to cover anticipated annualized costs and mitigate financial risk associated with communal services. The Model was built as a high-level ‘what-if’ tool, enabling the user to input costs, development size, and other parameters, in order to understand the funding required to reach steady-state (i.e., stable) annual charges. Two funding sources were identified and incorporated into the Model: a utility fee levied upon residential and commercial customers of the planned communal system; and a property tax increase levied upon all property owners in the County. Modelled cost-recovery options include: •
Option 1: Utility fee covers all costs
•
Option 2: Property tax covers catastrophe costs; utility fee covers remainder
•
Option 3: Property tax covers catastrophe and capital replacement costs; utility fee covers all other costs
•
Option 4: Property tax covers all costs
The Model allows for calculation and allocation of costs associated with construction of residential and/or commercial units. Additionally, the Model estimates risk-adjusted costs associated with unexpected, catastrophic failure of one or more communal water/wastewater systems in the County, based on user-defined risk tolerances and failure rates. ‘Catastrophe’ costs are those which are not planned for as part of routine Operation and Maintenance (O&M), rehabilitation, or capital replacement, nor covered by typical water/wastewater facility insurance policies. There are examples of communal servicing projects in Ontario and Canada that clearly demonstrate its benefits. This Study identifies solutions to perceived barriers to communal servicing, demonstrates the benefits of communal servicing, and sets out a framework for the County of Frontenac to encourage development on the basis of communal servicing.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 101 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page v
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR THE COUNTY Communal servicing enables: •
Increased development potential, growing the tax base;
•
More water-sensitive design and other approaches to meet sustainability objectives;
•
A broader range of housing typologies and commercial development to allow for complete communities;
•
Reduced municipal service delivery costs to residents (e.g. garbage collection, snow removal); and
•
A new approach to managing risk.
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR DEVELOPERS Through communal servicing, developers have more: •
Flexibility to address different market segments;
•
Feasible servicing approaches for developments in hard-to-service areas; and
•
Guidance and certainty on servicing.
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR RESIDENTS Residents on communal servicing can: •
Be confident in their water and wastewater treatment systems;
•
Have a wider choice of housing options, allowing for aging in place; and
•
Be confident that water resources are being appropriately stewarded.
WSP June 2019 Page vi
Page 102 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
1 INTRODUCTION The County of Frontenac (“the County”) is a rural upper-tier municipality located in Eastern Ontario, extending from the islands south of the City of Kingston to north of Highway 7, with a total area of 3,200 km2. The County boasts a stunning and varied natural landscape, a strong culture of environmental conservation, a strategic location relative to urban centres, and a historic pattern of villages and hamlets. Residents enjoy a high quality of life, and Frontenac welcomes residents and visitors to enjoy its natural and cultural heritage. According to the 2016 Census, the County’s total population is approximately 26,677 persons,1 with an additional significant seasonal population, spread across historic villages, small towns, and hamlets in four Townships: North Frontenac, Central Frontenac, South Frontenac, and Frontenac Islands, as illustrated in Figure 1-1. According to the Population, Housing and Employment Projections for the Frontenacs, prepared by Watson & Associates in 2014, the County’s permanent population is projected to grow from 27,900 persons in 2011 to 33,200 persons in 2036, an increase of 5,300.2 The County’s seasonal population is projected to grow from 29,600 persons in 2011 to 31,000 persons in 2036, an increase of 1,400.3 Together, the total permanent and seasonal population for the County is forecast to reach a total of 64,200 persons by 2036, representing an increase of approximately 6,700 persons from 2011.4 With population growth comes development pressures and the need to consider where and how development can be accommodated and serviced, while maintaining and enhancing the vitality and livability of the County’s villages and hamlets as rural community hubs with a distinct sense of place. Alternative water and wastewater servicing approaches can provide the County and its Townships with the innovative technology and flexibility to accommodate growth and achieve planning and economic development objectives.
1 Statistics Canada, Census Profile, 2016 Census, Frontenac, County, Ontario. 2 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2014. Population, Housing and Employment Projections for the Frontenacs,
pg. 10-2. 3 Ibid., Table F-6. 4 Ibid., pg. 10-2. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 103 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 1
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Figure 1-1: County of Frontenac Key Map
WSP June 2019 Page 2
Page 104 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The County retained WSP to prepare a regional Communal Services Study (“the Study”), with the following goals: 1)
Ensure land use planning criteria can be created to allow and promote new development on communal services;
Establish a financial model(s) that will reduce / eliminate the fiscal risk to the County and/or Townships to support new development on communal services;
Create planning policy that can be incorporated into the County and Township Official Plans to allow for consideration of communal services development; and
Provide options (planning, legal, servicing infrastructure) to permit new communal servicing infrastructure for existing buildings and infill development on mainstreets.
This Communal Servicing Study (“the Study”) demonstrates how these goals can be achieved and identifies solutions for the County of Frontenac to enable redevelopment and new development on the basis of communal services. Communal water and wastewater servicing offers the potential to enable new development and infill across the county, including on village and hamlet mainstreets, addressing some of the challenges associated with centralized municipal services and with private on-site services. Most importantly, communal servicing has the potential to support more compact, land-efficient development than is possible with private servicing, at a lower cost than is possible with centralized municipal services, and enable revitalization of the County’s communities.
1.1
THE SERVICING PROBLEM
Existing approaches to water and wastewater servicing constrain the County’s potential for growth. The cost of providing or expanding municipal water and wastewater services to all rural areas is not a fiscal reality for most municipalities. The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS) discourages partial servicing. Development on private individual on-site services inherently results in lower forms of density, due to the spatial requirements associated with well and septic treatment systems, and associated separation distances. Continued development on private services alone has the potential to result in inefficient use of land, and to threaten the long-term viability of the County’s villages and hamlets, especially their commercial cores and mainstreets. It limits the ability of the County and developers to respond to market trends, accommodate diverse housing types and needs and infill development on smaller lot sizes, which could assist in addressing increasing concerns related to rural housing affordability and accessibility. Reliance on private services also limits the ability to create mainstreets and commercial cores that are vibrant, walkable, and compact, and revitalize them through new commercial and mixed-use development, as well as conversions of uses. This may ultimately lead to declines in social and economic activity in village and hamlet cores by both residents and visitors, and a loss of sense of place.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 105 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The implementation of communal services has the potential to address many of these issues and assist the County and Townships in achieving their planning and economic development objectives and supporting thriving rural communities. However, perceived obstacles have slowed the implementation of communal services in many jurisdictions. The intent of this Study is to provide the County and its Townships with the knowledge, context, and tools to confidently enable implementation of communal services. There are several important areas to address to facilitate smooth implementation of communal services. Foremost among these is the Provincial requirement for Municipal Responsibility Agreements (MRAs) between developers of private communal systems and municipalities. It is critical to understand how best to mitigate and share financial responsibility and risk. County and Township Councils and staff need the tools to confidently understand, negotiate, and approve communal servicing projects.
1.2 WHAT ARE COMMUNAL SERVICES? The existing conventional options for wastewater treatment are municipal centralized services and private individual on-site services. In a centralized municipal system, water is distributed to and wastewater is collected from a large service area through an extensive piped collection / distribution infrastructure. The water / wastewater is treated at a municipally-owned plant which is generally over-sized for current needs to account for future growth. By contrast, private individual on-site services generally refer to well water and septic treatment systems which serve one dwelling, a cluster of dwellings on one lot, or a commercial or recreational facility. Communal servicing refers to communal drinking water systems and communal sewage systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of residences and businesses. They are an alternative to conventional municipal services and private individual on-site services. Communal systems are also sometimes called “decentralized systems” or “cluster systems.” While operating on the same basic principles as conventional municipal services, communal services are not connected to a single central facility. Instead, ‘right-sized’ facilities treat water and wastewater close to where it is needed or created. The three types of systems are shown schematically in Figure 1-2. Many different options exist within the broad category of communal servicing. Systems may be municipally- or privately-owned, using several different ownership and operation models. While many communal servicing systems use similar technical approaches, there is a growing range of treatment technologies that can be used. The distinguishing feature is that communal services treat water and wastewater close to where it is needed, reducing the need to pipe water or wastewater over long distances.
WSP June 2019 Page 4
Page 106 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Figure 1-2: Different types of servicing systems
Communal servicing examples include: Shadowridge Estates, Greely, Ottawa, Ontario (2011) • Subdivision of 45 single-detached houses and 113 semi-detached units; • Municipally-owned water and wastewater systems; • Wastewater treated through peat bed; • Drinking water extracted from well and treated through compact plant. Fieldstone Development, Township of Mono, Ontario (2014) • 340-unit subdivision of detached freehold homes; • Municipally-owned wells; • Conventional sewer collection system discharging to a Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) Treatment Unit; • Ultimate discharge of treated sewage is subsurface via area bed disposal systems; • Municipally-owned well field (five wells) using groundwater to service approximately 600 connections in the area. St-Joseph-de-Kamouraska, Quebec (2001) • 80 existing residential units; • Municipally-owned wastewater system; COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 107 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
• Wastewater from each residence is treated by an individual EcoFlo Advanced Treatment Unit; • Treated effluent from these units discharges via gravity sewers into one of five communal dosing stations; treated wastewater is discharged into Rivière du Loup.
1.3 WHY ARE COMMUNAL SERVICES THE RIGHT FIT FOR THE COUNTY OF FRONTENAC? Implementing communal services can assist the County and Townships in achieving their planning and economic development objectives. Communal water and wastewater servicing can enable new development and infill across the County, addressing some of the challenges associated with centralized municipal servicing and private on-site services. Communal servicing has the potential to enable more compact, land-efficient development than is possible with private servicing, at a lower cost than is possible with cent ralized municipal services. The majority of population growth is forecasted in the County’s rural areas, which is further evidenced by the location of active plans of subdivision across the County, and recent residential lot creation activity.5 While some growth and development in the County’s rural areas may be appropriate, haphazard rural development has the potential for negative impacts on the County’s natural heritage resources and the character of rural areas. Installing innovative, cost-effective communal water and wastewater facilities across the County would assist in reducing haphazard development, allowing for diverse housing types, and creating a sense of place in the County’s settlement areas, particularly for the mainstreets and commercial cores of the County’s villages and hamlets.
FULL MUNICIPAL SERVICES: Systems that connect many houses in a large settlement area with a central municipallyowned treatment plant. PRIVATE ON-SITE SERVICES: Provide water or treat/dispose wastewater on the same lot as it is used/generated. Private wells and septic systems are the most common form of onsite treatment. These are regulated through Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. COMMUNAL SERVICES: Systems that provide water and wastewater treatment to clusters of development, close to where it is needed, using a growing range of treatment technologies.
5 Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2014. Population, Housing and Employment Projections for the Frontenacs,
pg. 10-2. WSP June 2019 Page 6
Page 108 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The County and its consultant, WSP, in consultation with local developers, have identified designated settlement areas, traditional mainstreets in settlement areas, and waterfront lands as priority areas for communal servicing approaches. Regional coordination for communal services in the County will provide an advantage, as it will help to ensure that a consistent approach is applied across municipal jurisdictions in the Townships. The successful installation and operation of these communal systems will also assist the County in meeting the policy directions set out in the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), such as: •
Promoting efficient development and land use patterns, to minimize land consumption and servicing costs;
•
Focusing growth and development in settlement areas, to promote their vitality and regeneration;
•
Accommodating a mix of densities and land uses;
•
Encouraging opportunities for intensification and redevelopment;
•
Providing for a range and mix of housing types and densities required to meet the needs of current and future residents, such as affordable housing, aging in place, and denser development on smaller lot sizes that is located in proximity to community services;
•
Protecting natural heritage and the environment, by reducing potential nutrient loading impacts on lakes and waterbodies which are critical to the County’s economy, quality of life, and protection of fish habitat and species; and Increasing public health and safety by developing and implementing a regular inspection and reporting system for the public.
In the County, communal servicing systems can facilitate: •
New development on smaller lot sizes that are a better ‘fit’ into the existing fabric of a village or hamlet;
•
Developments within settlement areas that are dense enough to promote walkability, lowercarbon lifestyles, and efficient use of other municipal services and infrastructure;
•
More housing within walking distance of mainstreets and commercial cores, to assist in strengthening the local economy;
•
Commercial or industrial development and possible creation of a business park;
•
Infilling and redevelopment along mainstreets, to promote vibrant community hubs, and on brownfield sites;
•
Development of a broader range of housing types in the County, such as seniors’ homes and outdoor lifestyle communities;
•
Increased opportunities for mixed-use development, and for home-based businesses; and
•
Rural and waterfront development that protects the County’s water quality and natural heritage.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 109 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 7
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Some communities in Ontario already rely on communal water and wastewater servicing, including Indigenous communities and RV parks. Interest in communal servicing tends to be greater in rural and lower-density communities, due to the following potential benefits:
MORE EFFICIENT LAND USE
Communal servicing allows more efficient land use as compared to private on-site servicing. In many rural communities and smaller centres, centralized servicing is often not resourceeffective. By contrast, communal servicing can support densities up to those supported by centralized municipal services, in targeted areas at relatively low cost. Figure 1-3 illustrates an actual residential development in the County with private on-site services. Figure 1-4 conceptually illustrates the additional density and development potential which could be enabled through the implementation of communal services for that same subdivision. The 28-hectare subdivision accommodates a total of 16 lots for single-detached dwellings, with each lot being serviced by private on-site water and wastewater systems. If the subdivision was developed on communal services, for example, it could accommodate a total of 62 units, including 41 lots for single-detached dwellings, 9 lots for townhouse dwellings, and an apartment complex with 12 units, representing almost 4 times the density. This would have financial implications from an increased tax revenue perspective, and be a more fiscally responsible outcome for the development and the community as a whole. This is described in detail in the Financial Model, as discussed in Section 7.
REDUCED FINANCIAL BURDEN
Numerous studies have shown that communal servicing infrastructure can be cost-effective as compared to centralized infrastructure, for the following reasons: •
Municipal systems are designed for over-capacity to accommodate growing populations. Modular communal systems permit expansion as needed.6
•
Communal systems reduce the need for expansive collection and distribution infrastructure, which are a substantial component of project costs.
•
Where actual costs are similar over 50+ years, the cost of financing the large capital expenditures for municipal systems make communal systems cheaper.7
Communal servicing compares favourably with private servicing, and appropriate financing structures can help distribute the burden to individual property owners.
6 G. Tjandraatmadja, S. Burn, M. McLaughlin et al, “Rethinking urban water systems - Revisiting concepts in urban
wastewater collection and treatment to ensure infrastructure sustainability,” Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 5 no.2 (2005). 7 R.D. Pinkham, J. Magliaro, J. and M. Kinsley. Case Studies of Economic Analysis and Community Decision Making for Decentralized Wastewater Systems. (Snowmass, CO, USA: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2004). WSP June 2019 Page 8
Page 110 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
Communal servicing systems inherently offer some environmental benefits. Smart choices throughout the planning and design process can yield even greater environmental benefits. Most communal servicing projects achieve environmental benefits: •
Water is returned to the environment close to where it was withdrawn;
•
Higher water and wastewater treatment standards can be expected than for private services;
•
Environmental and social costs of large distribution/collection networks are avoided; and
•
Monitoring inspection programs can ensure that the systems are always operating at a quality standard.
Broader environmental benefits can be achieved with thoughtful design: •
•
•
Reductions in water consumption: o
Demand management permits smaller treatment systems,
o
Built-in financial incentive to invest in water-efficient design,
o
In-building treatment and reuse systems (e.g. greywater recycling systems) offer the strongest potential environmental benefits.8
Greater adaptability and resilience in the face of climate change: o
Better control of inflow / infiltration reduces risk of catastrophic flooding,9
o
Many smaller systems significantly reduce the risk of catastrophic failure.10
Innovative technology, including resource recovery, can be implemented. For example, the following approaches offer specific benefits: o
In-Building Treatment Systems allow reuse of water, reducing water use.
o
Advanced Treatment Units and Package Treatment Plants, like the Ecoflo and the Waterloo Biofilter achieve extremely high treatment quality with little land consumption, making them appropriate for mainstreet and infill-type development. Installation and maintenance information for these systems are included in Appendix E.
Mark Snider, Mike Dwyer, Brittany Mulhern and Roddy Bolivar, A Fresh Look – Alternative Servicing Models for Ontario’s Villages, (Township of Rideau Lakes, ON: McIntosh Perry CE, Twp. of Rideau Lakes, Bolivar~Phillips, 2016). 9 A. G. Capodaglio, A. Callegari, D. Cecconet and D. Molognoni, “Sustainability of decentralized wastewater treatment technologies,” Water Practice and Technology, Vol 12 No. 2 (2017): 463-477. 10 L. Chelleri, T. Schuetze and L. Salvati, “Integrating resilience with urban sustainability in neglected neighbourhoods: Challenges and opportunities of transitioning to decentralized water management in Mexico City.” Habitat International, 48 (2015), 122-130. 8
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 111 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 9
AGENDA ITEM #b)
o
•
Constructed wetlands require little energy, and can function as habitat.11
Careful attention must be paid to separate projects located on the same aquifer, to ensure that well interference is minimized and sustainable yields are maintained.
Figure 1-3: Subdivision Development Potential on Individual Servicing
11 Yates, “Developing and Understanding for Wastewater Treatment in Remote Communities in Nunavut, Canada.”
WSP June 2019 Page 10
Page 112 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Figure 1-4: Subdivision Development Potential on Communal Servicing
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 113 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 11
AGENDA ITEM #b)
1.4 STUDY PURPOSE In undertaking this Study, the County is responding proactively to emerging opportunities for water and wastewater servicing in its four Townships. The fundamental purpose of the Study is to equip the County with the planning, engineering, and economic development tools necessary to enable redevelopment and new development on the basis of communal services. This Study also identifies the existing regulatory and planning framework for communal servicing, as well as critical engineering and financial considerations. In doing so, the Study identifies regulatory and planning hurdles and risks for projects using communal servicing. The Communal Services Study will empower the County and its Townships to manage the complexity inherent in water and wastewater servicing questions, with the objective to facilitate development on communal services. The key outputs of the overall Study include: •
Criteria-based Official Plan policies to encourage new development on communal services, as well as for commercial mainstreet redevelopment; o
A planning rationale for consideration of development on partial services (i.e. communal septic, individual wells) within the context of the PPS;
o
Legal tools and processes available under the Planning Act and the Condominium Act that can be applied, and those scenarios where such tools could be considered for use;
o
‘Templates’ of such tools that can be used by the municipalities;
•
Engineering best practices, including a monitoring approach for communal systems; and
•
A Financial Model to reduce the risk for the municipalities and developers associated with entering into Municipal Responsibility Agreements.
The measure of success for this Study will be the initiation of a project on communal services within 18 months of Council approval of the Study.
2 COMMUNITY OVERVIEW 2.1 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS Growth projections prepared in 2014 for the County of Frontenac by Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. forecast that the County’s permanent population is projected to grow from
WSP June 2019 Page 12
Page 114 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
27,900 persons in 2011, to 33,200 persons in 2036, which represents an increase of 5,300.12 The majority of this population growth, approximately 67%, is anticipated to occur in the Township of South Frontenac, largely due to its proximity to the City of Kingston, employment opportunities for commuters, as well as continued local employment growth.13 The Township of Central Frontenac is anticipated to accommodate the next largest fraction of the growth (17%), followed by the Township of Frontenac Islands (9%), and the Township of North Frontenac (7%), as illustrated in Figure 2-1.
Figure 2-1: Allocation of Permanent Population Growth in the County of Frontenac by Municipality, 2011-2036
The population growth trends in the County are likely to be impacted by significant decisions in the neighbouring City of Kingston. The City has made the planning decision to maintain the City’s current urban boundary, and accommodate the majority of future growth through intensification. Further, the addition of a second ferry between Wolfe Island and downtown Kingston proposed by the Ministry of Transportation (MTO), anticipated in 2021, will double existing capacity and will likely result in growth pressures on Wolfe Island. The Township of Frontenac Islands is expected to commence a secondary planning study for the Village of
12
Watson & Associates Economists Ltd., 2014. Population, Housing and Employment Projections for the Frontenacs, pg. 10-2. 13 Ibid., pg. 10-2. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 115 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 13
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Marysville on Wolfe Island in mid-2019, which will include a review of future servicing options. As such, Frontenac Islands may experience an increase in population and employment, and potentially the opportunity for establishment or confirmation of new settlement areas. The County of Frontenac has a high and increasing proportion of seniors.14 This is due to agingin-place of current residents, recent retirees who are ‘moving home,’ retiring urbanites wishing to move to a smaller community and a more rural lifestyle, and the out-migration of younger adults. This older demographic has unique housing needs. In particular, seniors and older adults may need greater community support and infrastructure than is compatible with dispersed development. The County of Frontenac is also seeing an increase in the number of seasonal residents. This includes summer cottagers as well as tourists who are attracted by the County’s natural and cultural heritage. Tourism is a significant potential source of economic growth for the County, and the County must develop solutions to ensure adequate short-term and seasonal accommodations for this market. The tourism market is also distributed well throughout the County, with North, South and Central Frontenac Townships each supporting approximately 30% of the County’s existing stock of short-term accommodations. Frontenac Islands has the potential to expand its tourist market, particularly in the agri-tourism sector. Ensuring appropriate servicing approaches will help enable growth of this sector without undermining the County’s natural beauty and rustic atmosphere.15
2.2 LAND USE The land use structure of the County follows important historical patterns. The County’s hamlets and villages have historically served as economic centres for rural agricultural, resourceextraction and recreational communities, and are increasingly serving an important residential use. While economic trends are shifting, the rural character of the County, and its strong agricultural and recreational economies, are central to the County’s continued success. Figure 2-2 shows the distribution of settlement areas in the County of Frontenac.
14 City of Kingston and County of Frontenac, 10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan, 2013.
https://www.frontenaccounty.ca/en/corporate/resources/10_Year_Housing_Homelssness_Plan_Kingston_and_Fronte nac.pdf 15 MDB Insight, “County of Frontenac Accommodation Review and Strategy for Growth,” Report for the County of Frontenac, July 2017. https://www.infrontenac.ca/en/invest-in-frontenac/resources/Documents/FrontenacAccommodation-Review-and-Strategy-for-Growth.pdf WSP June 2019 Page 14
Page 116 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Figure 2-2: Settlement Areas in the County of Frontenac
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 117 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 15
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The unique community characteristics are described and designated in the County and Township Official Plans. The policies included therein aim to provide a balanced and sensible protection of waterbodies and waterfront, agricultural lands and natural heritage features with rural residential and commercial development. Development of waterfront residential properties – whether seasonal or year-round – has long been an important land use within the County. Balancing new growth in waterfront areas with protection for natural features is a critical challenge facing the county. The southern areas of the County of Frontenac are historically agricultural communities. However, they are increasingly experiencing more development pressures, largely due to inmigration, Kingston’s fixed urban boundary, the desire for larger lots / rural living, and a desire for rural affordability. The dynamics in the County’s southern areas will permit different approaches to development on communal servicing as compared to the County’s more forested and remote northern areas, which have more seasonal residential waterfront development and larger rural lots. In the current planning and policy framework, the County’s growth is focused on 36 Settlement Areas distributed throughout the County. The largest of these are villages with 200-300 homes, and the smallest consist of a handful of homes and buildings clustered around a crossroads (see Figure 2-3 for examples). As noted in Section 3.1 of the County of Frontenac Official Plan, some of these smaller Settlement Areas likely do not meet the definition of Settlement Areas in the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement. At the same time, servicing limitations constrain growth and redevelopment in the County’s larger Settlement Areas.
Figure 2-3: Approximate boundaries for Snow Road Station Settlement Area in North Frontenac (left) and Sydenham Settlement Area in South Frontenac (right)
WSP June 2019 Page 16
Page 118 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The County has expressed interest in rationalizing the Settlement Areas on the basis of further study. This would represent excellent growth management practice. As the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario has noted, municipalities often assess and plan for infrastructure capability after growth areas have been delineated, to great economic and ecological cost.16 Appropriate servicing approaches implemented on the basis of this Study, would substantially upgrade the development potential of many settlement areas, as will broader trends influencing the County including economic spinoff from the Third Crossing Bridge and increases in eco- and agri-tourism in the County. Therefore, the outcomes of this Study should inform any changes made to Settlement Areas including potential boundary expansions at the time of Comprehensive Official Plan review by the County and Townships. It must be noted that the Algonquins of Ontario must be consulted as part of this process.
2.3 HISTORIC VILLAGES AND MAINSTREETS The County of Frontenac is made up of dozens of historical settlements, connected by country highways. While each hamlet, village and cross-roads community has a unique character, shaped by its history and location within the County, all share a settlement typology. These communities, from Marysville to Ompah, are oriented around mainstreets. Traditionally, mainstreets acted as economic centres for the surrounding rural region, and were the places that people came to shop, meet friends, and attend community events. Figure 2-4 shows Verona’s mainstreet in the 1930s – a successful community and retail centre despite the Great Depression.
Figure 2-4: Verona Mainstreet, circa 1930 (Jeff Green, Frontenac News, 2015)
16 Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, “Losing Our Touch”, (ECO 2011/2012 Annual Report, Part 2, Toronto,
ON: Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, 2012). COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 119 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 17
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Economic trends since the mid 20th century have changed the role of the County’s communities and their mainstreets. Many retail functions have been amalgamated in larger population centres resulting in a diminished role for mainstreets, and now the residential role of these communities is just as important as their economic one. Unfortunately, existing approaches to servicing limit the ability of these communities to capitalize on their potential to house new community members, and to enhance their historic role as local centres of economic activity. Additionally, many lots in the hearts of these communities are undersized relative to modern standards for private servicing, prohibiting redevelopment and resulting in potential environmental risks. New development within these communities happens on the basis of lot sizes optimized for private servicing, not for densities which promote walkability, neighbourliness, and a village feel. Fortunately, communal servicing would enable added density in existing settlement areas, including intensification and mixed-use redevelopment along mainstreets, and residential development that is sufficiently dense to promote active transportation, environmental sustainability, and the viability of local community institutions and businesses.
2.4 HOUSING The majority of the County’s housing is in the form of single-detached homes. As compared to the Province, the County has a high level of home ownership, and overall good housing affordability. In 2013, the County committed to ensuring housing quality and affordability by implementing the updated Municipal Housing Strategy and the 10-Year Municipal Housing & Homelessness Plan, in concert with the City of Kingston. This Plan identified increasing home prices in the County as a potential threat to affordability. 17 The majority of new development, whether it is waterfront-oriented or not, is intended for yearround habitation, and relies on private water and sewage systems. Another important housing trend observed in the County is the conversion of seasonal waterfront and recreational dwellings to year-round residences. Based on recent MPAC data, 7,897 out of 29,002 parcels in the County are considered seasonal.18 Housing affordability for renters and seniors is more constrained due to limited rental stock. Additionally, housing stock in the County of Frontenac is older as compared to Kingston, so the costs of maintaining and upgrading properties – including on-site servicing – can strain the budgets of homeowners.19
17
City of Kingston and County of Frontenac, 10-Year Municipal Housing & Homelessness Plan.
18 MPAC Information provided by the County of Frontenac, April 12, 2019. 19Ibid.
WSP June 2019 Page 18
Page 120 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
2.5 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL HERITAGE Protection of the County’s ecologically rich and aesthetically stunning natural environment is critical. The County’s growing recreational economy, as well as its traditional agricultural and resource-extractive industries, rely on a healthy environment. South Frontenac contains part of the “Frontenac Arch” – the curved portion of the Canadian Shield that links to the Adirondacks Mountains in the United States through South Frontenac. This ecologically-rich system has been recognized by the community through the UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve program.20 The County also has an extensive area of Crown land in its northern region: the Township of North Frontenac is comprised of 64% Crown Land, and the Township of Central Frontenac is comprised of 17% Crown Land, as illustrated in Figure 2-5.
Figure 2-5: County of Frontenac Crown Land, Figure #2 Crown Land, County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016
20 The Frontenac Arch Biosphere Network, “What is the Frontenac Arch Biosphere?”,
http://www.frontenacarchbiosphere.ca/. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 121 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 19
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The County’s water resources must be protected through safe and clean water and wastewater servicing. One source of risk for human health in the areas geology has been identified – most of the County is underlain by Precambrian Shield, which is prone to cracking and seepage, increasing the risk of septic movement.21 Local developers have identified the rockier ground in the north of the County as a particular challenge to installing adequately sized septic beds. South Frontenac, with the greatest development potential, is also shaped by important water resources: its land area is 17% lakes, and 12% wetland.22 The other Townships also have significant lake and wetland resources. The County has identified lakes which support Lake Trout populations as a conservation priority, such as Big Salmon Lake, illustrated in Figure 2-6. The County of Frontenac Official Plan ensures their protection through limits on development. Adequate water and sewer servicing is critical to the health of the County’s Trout Lakes and all its aquatic ecosystems.
Figure 2-6: Big Salmon Lake in Frontenac Provincial Park (CC 2.0 Ted Goldring, 2006)
2.6 CLIMATE CHANGE AND RISK Climate change has already begun to impact the County. Extreme hot days, as well as extreme precipitation events have increased.23 Understanding the types of risks to water and wastewater servicing that are exacerbated by climate change is critical. These include: •
Extreme storm events increasing inflow/infiltration, overwhelming treatment capacity;
21 County of Frontenac, Official Plan (2016 Consolidation), Subsection 4.2.1.4.1 “Special Policies: Future Villages
Services Planning,” p 42. 22 County of Frontenac Mapping, http://www.frontenacmaps.ca/mapgallery.html 23 Adam Fenech, “Climate Change at Frontenac Arch Biosphere Reserve: Preliminary Results,” Presentation, Climate Lab at the University of Toronto. Environment Canada, August 28, 2010. WSP June 2019 Page 20
Page 122 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Extreme weather, including rain on frozen ground, may flood infrastructure24; and
•
Extended droughts reduce flow in receiving water bodies, limiting assimilative capacity.
Risk management for communal wastewater systems is critical. In fact, risk in communal and small-scale systems may be easier to manage than in larger municipal systems, due to their smaller scale.25 Communal systems may also represent a smaller risk of contamination as opposed to multiple individual private wells, and issues would likely be easier and more cost effective to respond to if, for example, a deeper well is required. Communal systems and new technologies also offer the opportunity to reduce the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment.26
3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The Federal government, the Government of Ontario, and local municipalities all play a role in planning, regulating and approving all water and wastewater servicing. Ontario’s Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) plays a lead role in ensuring that water and sewage projects are safe for the environment and people. Upper- and lower-tier municipal governments also play a key role in implementing Provincial and local policy. While Conservation Authorities do not have a direct regulatory or approvals role in most cases, they are important partners for municipalities and the Province. A full review of the relevant Federal and Provincial policies, legislation, and guidelines is available in Appendix A.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT •
Sets minimum environmental standards for sewage effluent through the Canada Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, SOR/2012-138 Fisheries Act.
•
Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality are used by Provinces to develop drinking water quality guidelines.
•
There is no direct involvement of the Federal government in most water and wastewater treatment projects, because the Federal government is not directly responsible for water and wastewater planning or approvals, and Ontario standards for water and wastewater quality meet or exceed Federal requirements.
24 R Sandford and K. Freek, Flood Forecast: Climate Risk and Resiliency in Canada [e-book] (Victoria, British
Columbia: Rocky Mountain Books; 2014). 25 AECOM and C40 Cities, “C40 Infrastructure Interdependencies + Climate Risks,” Report, C40 Infrastructure Interdependencies and Cascading Climate Impacts Study, April 2017. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/report_c40_interdependencies_.pdf. 26 ECO, Every Drop Counts: Reducing the Energy and Climate Footprint of Ontario’s Water Use (ECO 2016/2017 Annual Report, Toronto, ON: Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, 2017). COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 123 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 21
AGENDA ITEM #b)
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO •
Under the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement and the Planning Act, RSO 1990, c. P.13, Section 2, the Province sets directions for sewage and water planning that municipalities must be consistent with and conform to.
•
Regulates effluent being discharged into the environment by requiring Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) for most sewage projects, including communal wastewater treatment projects. The need for an ECA is triggered by Section 9.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, RSO 1990, c. E.19 or Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, RSO 1990, c. O.40. o
The ECA process ensures that new wastewater treatment projects will not lower the quality of Ontario waterbodies below the Provincial Water Quality Objectives, outlined in Water Management: Policies, Guidelines Provincial Water Quality Guidelines, 1994.
2014 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT IN FOCUS: Sections 1.6.6.2 to 1.6.6.5 of the PPS set out preferred options for servicing. This is referred to as the “servicing hierarchy” for water and wastewater:
- Full municipal services,
- Private communal services.
- Private on-site services
- Partial services (only allowed in case of failure)
•
Regulates small drinking water systems, under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, RSO 1990, c. H.7, O. Reg. 319/08.
•
Institutes source protection in the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 2002, as amended. Effective July 1, 2018, drinking water suppliers must undertake technical source protection work which must be reviewed by the local Conservation Authority (if applicable) and approved by the MECP.
•
Approves projects that trigger an Environmental Assessment, (Section 3 of the Environmental Assessment Act, 1990, and O-Reg 345/93).
•
Publishes D-5 Planning for Water and Sewage Service Guidelines, which are used by the province to evaluate and approve wastewater projects. o
The “servicing hierarchy” seems to discourage communal services. In fact, communal services will help the County of Frontenac and its Townships be consistent with the PPS: Communal servicing will allow more efficient land use and development – a central goal of the PPS.
D-5-2 Application of Municipal Responsibility for Communal Water and Sewage Service only contemplates municipal operation and ownership, or communal servicing for condominiums – a major constraint for communal servicing projects.
WSP June 2019 Page 22
Page 124 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
MUNICIPALITIES •
Responsible under the Planning Act for ensuring consistency of local planning policy and development approvals with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS).
•
Power under the Planning Act to plan for water and wastewater services, and to ensure development only occurs where adequate water and wastewater servicing is possible.
•
Responsible for reviewing development applications to ensure that servicing plans will be safe, healthy and environmentally responsible.
•
Through Municipal Responsibility Agreements (MRAs), must take responsibility for failed communal systems.
As the County of Frontenac embraces the potential of communal servicing, it is critical that municipal councils and staff, developers and interested residents understand how communal servicing projects are affected by this regulatory and approvals framework. Figure 3-1 illustrates how a hypothetical communal wastewater system would pass through the approvals process. This hypothetical project discharges more than 10,000 L/day (about 20 houses). Wastewater treatment systems that treat less than 10,000 L/day might not trigger the need for an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA), although the same principles and standards would apply.
Figure 3-1: Regulatory approvals process for a hypothetical communal wastewater system
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 125 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 23
AGENDA ITEM #b)
3.1 LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNAL SERVICING The Federal and Provincial legislative and regulatory parameters have historically been oriented towards centralized municipal services. The legislative and regulatory review undertaken for the Study highlights how the proponent of a communal servicing project can navigate the existing regulatory framework. Importantly, the responsibility is on the proponent to establish the proposed system’s technical feasibility, approach to managing risk, and the environmental benefits of the system. Other important implications for municipalities and private proponents interested in communal servicing approaches are as follows: 1)
Communal servicing systems can support the broad objectives of the PPS towards intensification, efficient land use, the need to address rural affordability, settlement area growth, preservation of agricultural land, increased active transportation, efficient infrastructure, and economic development by allowing denser development in small settlement areas.
The servicing hierarchy expressed in Sections 1.6.6.2-5 of the PPS and reinforced in other legislation, regulations and guidelines, distinguishes between municipally-owned services and private communal services, but does not define the type of municipal service. Therefore, municipally-owned or operated communal servicing would not be in the ‘second tier’ of servicing options.
Proponents and/or municipalities are liable for failures in servicing infrastructure. The legislative language is oriented towards protection of the environment and public health.
Provincial policy, legislation and regulation refer to efficient use of resources, conservation and protection of the natural environment. However, beyond regulating discharge of pollutants into waterbodies, the regulatory framework offers little guidance as to how servicing infrastructure can support these goals.
Guideline D-5-2 Application of Municipal Responsibility for Communal Water and Sewage Service structures the relationship between private communal services and the municipality by requiring an MRA in many situations. However, it is anticipated that an MRA would likely not be required for a commercial-only mainstreet servicing project, nor for seasonal/recreational projects. MRAs apply to permanent and primary residences. In the case of commercial-only uses or seasonal residences and failure of communal services, the MECP has the authority to shut services down until they are repaired.
A critical question remains regarding the appropriate sizing of communal services. Guideline D-5 Planning for Sewage and Water Services is clear that sufficient capacity to support growth must be present before development, but does not provide a specific formula for determining the appropriate capacity of new water and wastewater servicing systems. Planning for centralized services may rely on industry common practice or
WSP June 2019 Page 24
Page 126 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
comparisons to nearby servicing areas. However, centralized systems must consider the following factors: o Extremely high cost to expand treatment and distribution capacity after-the fact; o Limited ability to predict impact of water demand management programs; and o Significant potential for inflow and infiltration over the infrastructure’s lifespan.
By contrast, developers who look to install communal services for a specific development may be able to better control these factors. Determining appropriate servicing capacity is critical for managing risk, but where servicing capacity can safely be assumed to be smaller, project proponents can save on infrastructure costs.27
4 EXISTING LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT 4.1 THE ROLE OF CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES Conservation Authorities are an important resource and partner for water and sewer works, and are often responsible for working with Province to monitor water quality and flow of waterbodies within their area. The data they provide is used by the MECP to help define the effluent quantity and quality that may be discharged under an ECA. Conservation Authorities may also be involved in source water protection. Four (4) Conservation Authorities have authority within the County. Conservation Authorities’ jurisdictions follow watershed boundaries rather than political ones, so careful coordination between the County, the applicable Township, the relevant Conservation Authority, and the project proponent is important. The Ontario Low Water Response Program was established in 2009 to help Ontario prepare for drought conditions. Under this program, Conservation Authorities are encouraged to
Figure 4-1: Key Map of Conservation Authorities within County of Frontenac
27 M. Binstock, Moving toward a soft path approach? A case study of water management in Guelph, Ontario (Toronto,
ON: Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy, 2010). COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 127 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 25
AGENDA ITEM #b)
establish minimum flow thresholds for aquatic ecosystem health, considering the impact of wastewater effluent in low water conditions.28 They may also address groundwater conditions. Conservation Authorities have water conservation and demand management programs, as described below. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority •
Monitors water quantity on eight (8) streams.
•
Monitors water quality through MECP’s Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network.
•
Low water response plan partner.
Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority •
Monitors the effect of development and land use to assess watershed conditions through field monitoring, remote sensing and gathering and interpreting information on the status of water and water related natural resources on an ongoing basis.
•
Has Low Water Response Plan to coordinate responses between agencies.
•
Has a septic re-inspection program.
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority •
Administers Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code on behalf of the City of Ottawa and Tay Valley Township by reviewing and issuing Building Permits for construction, enlargement and/or alteration of sewage disposal (i.e. private) systems.
•
Has a septic re-inspection program.
•
Monitors and maps water quality and flow levels.
Quinte Conservation Authority •
Has developed Low Water Response and monitors flow thresholds.
•
Part of the Ontario Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network and the Ontario Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network which provides data to the MECP on water quality.
4.2 OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW At the time of this report, the following Official Plans and Draft Official Plans were reviewed: •
County of Frontenac Official Plan (2016);
•
Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan (2013);
28 ECO, Losing our Touch.
WSP June 2019 Page 26
Page 128 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003);
•
Township of Central Frontenac Official Plan (2008);
•
Township of Central Frontenac Draft Official Plan (2018); and
•
Township of North Frontenac Official Plan (2017).
It should be noted that the Township of South Frontenac is anticipated to undertake the development of a new Official Plan, beginning in mid-2019. Policies related to water and wastewater servicing varied significantly across the County and Townships. Each of the Official Plans contain strong policy directions supporting infill of settlement areas and revitalization of traditional villages and main streets. As previously noted, perceived barriers to communal servicing have constrained the availability of appropriate water and wastewater services in the County. There is a strong opportunity for the County and its Townships to encourage development and revitalization by adopting policies that are supportive of communal servicing options.
4.2.1 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, ADOPTED OCTOBER 15, 2014, MMAH APPROVAL JANUARY 11, 2016 The Official Plan for the County of Frontenac (“County OP”) was adopted by Council on Wednesday October 29, 2014 and was approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing on January 11, 2016. The County OP is in full force and effect. The County OP provides over-arching policy direction on matters of provincial and County-wide significance. The County OP directs growth management and land use decisions by providing uppertier land use planning guidance for the County’s member municipalities. Detailed land use planning and local decision making is managed and administered locally through the local municipal Official Plans. There are a number of community priorities that are identified in the County OP that can be more effectivity delivered from a planning and economic development perspective through the implementation of communal services across the County and Townships. For example, Section 2.2.2 – Tourism in the County OP contains policies to promote tourism and leisure activities which include lakes and rivers, which could benefit from development on communal systems, while protecting the environment. In addition, there are several types of land uses that would benefit from development on communal systems to enable more development, smaller lot sizes, and better overall
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 129 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
management of lands, such as business parks (Section 2.2.3), rural lands (Section 3.3), and waterfront areas which have special policies as identified in Section 3.3.3.4 in the County OP. As stated in Section 3.1.2 in the County OP, another community priority is the importance of ensuring the housing supply can meet growth projections, as well as providing a diversity of housing types to enable County residents to age in place. This would be enhanced by allowing development on communal services. It would offer residents choice, and it would offer developers an option to develop with increased densities and smaller lot sizes, serviced by a communal system. Section 3, “Growth Management,” contains policies to encourage intensification and redevelopment of the County’s traditional villages, mainstreets and settlement areas. It also acknowledges that existing servicing approaches are constraining smart growth in the County. In fact, the County OP’s policies in Section 4.2.1.5 Private Services constrain potential development in Settlement Areas – they state that private services may only be used for infilling and minor rounding out but municipal services are unlikely to be available to support intensification.
Section 3 Growth Management 3.1(c): “The lack of full municipal water and wastewater services in any of the hamlets or villages of the County will constrain the ability to increase the density of these areas, and may impact the ability to focus new development within these settlement areas; […]”
The County OP identifies the opportunity to rationalize Settlement Areas, including on the basis of water and wastewater servicing potential. The County OP also provides direction to the Townships: •
Section 3.3.3: Townships should coordinate with each other to ensure that development within the same watershed is environmentally appropriate.
•
Section: 3.3.3(2)(d): Townships should work with the County to investigate new technologies and communal servicing options.
•
Section 3.3.3(2)(e): Townships should establish minimum lot size based on local conditions.
Several policies of the County OP that explicitly discourage communal servicing must be amended. These are identified in Appendix B. Section 4.2.1.4.1 Special Policies: Future Village Services Planning contains a range of policy options to investigate/promote the development of full municipal services. Given the potential benefits of communal servicing over municipal services to achieve the goals of the County OP, the tools and approaches in this section may be amended to support communal services rather than municipal services. This would also assist in providing an opportunity for local businesses and/or landowners of vacant properties to redevelop, expand, and to potentially apply for a community improvement grant.
WSP June 2019 Page 28
Page 130 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Furthermore, the County’s lakes and river systems are important as established through the preparation of Lake Management Plans (LMPs), as described in Section 7.1.4.13 in the County OP. The preparation of the LMPs identify and protect the physical and environmental values and can result in a vision for the lake community, and land use policies and direction for stewardship. LMPs and the lake capacity assessment to determine carrying capacity for development and opportunities to improve water quality.
4.2.2 TOWNSHIP OF FRONTENAC ISLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN, JULY 2013 CONSOLIDATED VERSION The Township of Frontenac Islands Official Plan (July 2013 Consolidation) states that the preferred servicing option for its Settlement Areas is full municipal services. However, in the event that full municipal services are not feasible, it identifies communal services as the preferred means of servicing. The Official Plan has strong support for communal servicing; however, additional policies outlining options and criteria for communal servicing may help to support implementation of the Township’s existing policies. Section 3.2.4.1 Communal Water Supply This policy indicates that new residential development of 6 residential units or more will be served by communal water supply systems except where it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Township that a communal system is not feasible or practical. In terms of administration and management, all new communal water supply systems designed to serve more than 5 residential lots/units shall be assumed by the municipality for administration and maintenance purposes and an annual review of all municipal water supply systems shall be required.
4.2.3 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, MARCH 2003, TEXT AMENDMENTS APPROVED BY MMAH MAY 23, 2013 The development policies for settlement areas in the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003, 2013) which is in full force and effect, are broadly permissive to encourage enough building of appropriate stock to support affordability and elasticity in the residential and non-residential market. However, given current servicing approaches, this goal is constrained by the need to provide safe and adequate services. Nevertheless, many policies in the Township’s Official Plan explicitly discourage communal servicing and innovative servicing options. Section 4.8 Servicing Objectives “(vi) To prohibit private communal systems in the Township.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 131 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 29
AGENDA ITEM #b)
On May 27, 2019, Township Council repealed an Official Plan Amendment (OPA 23), which was adopted on September 15, 2015, as the OPA was never approved by the County and is now out of date. The Township of South Frontenac will be undertaking the development of a new Official Plan, anticipated to begin in mid-2019. Future communal servicing options and appropriate policies will be considered as part of the new Official Plan. As such, a review of the Township’s existing Official Plan policies is not included in Appendix B.
4.2.4 TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, APPROVED WITH MODIFICATIONS JUNE 18, 2008 (IN FORCE AT TIME OF STUDY PUBLICATION) The Township of Frontenac Official Plan which is currently in full force and effect discourages smaller lots and higher densities in settlement areas, hamlets and the Village of Sharbot Lake on the basis of servicing constraints. Policies in Section 4.2 of the Plan are intended to discourage any development that might demand centralized services. Nevertheless, the Official Plan does contemplate the potential of communal services for multiple lot development in Section 4.2.4.
4.2.5 TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, FIRST DRAFT MAY 15, 2018 The Draft Official Plan for the Township of Central Frontenac contains many progressive policies that explicitly and implicitly support communal servicing. These policy directions include: •
Consideration of climate change impacts, in Section 2.2.
•
Support for efficient development patterns, in Section 2.3.2 and 2.3.5.
•
Strong support for sustainable practices, including conservation of water resources, actions that improve or restore ecological functions, and the use of adaptive technologies that reduce consumptive practices, in Section 2.3.17.
The Official Plan establishes the criteria for evaluating communal servicing proposals in Section 3.17.3. Nevertheless, policies of the Draft Official Plan could be amended to strengthen support for communal servicing.
4.2.6 TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 Section 3.17 Provisions for Water Supply and Sewage Disposal in the Township of North Frontenac Official Plan states, “Servicing will be on the basis of individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services. This reflects the character of the area as well as the intent to avoid densities, which may necessitate the installation of piped services.” While recognizing the lower-density character of North Frontenac, stronger support for communal servicing should be considered during the next Official Plan Review.
WSP June 2019 Page 30
Page 132 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Currently the Official Plan policies that offer support for development on communal servicing include: •
Section 3.17 acknowledges the need for private communal services for larger-scale permanent residential developments, RV park developments, and tourist and recreational developments.
•
Subsection 3.17.3 Communal Services outlines the criteria for evaluating communal servicing proposals.
•
Section 4.2.3 Hamlet Principles promotes intensification for hamlets.
Several policies of the Official Plan that explicitly discourage communal servicing must be amended. These are identified in Appendix B.
4.3 SUMMARY Generally, the policies in the County of Frontenac’s current Official Plan, similar to those of its Townships, are permissive of communal servicing, within the existing provincial regulatory requirements. However, they tend to prioritize private on-site servicing. A stronger policy framework at the County level and in the Townships’ Official Plans will need to be developed to provide landowners with the option for development on communal servicing. This framework will identify how this servicing can be implemented from land use planning, engineering and financial perspectives. Appendix C contains draft policies to be considered for inclusion in the County and Township Official Plans, including new policy additions and revisions to existing policies to better direct development on communal services and facilitate progressive growth management in the County.
PARKLAND DEDICATION One potential issue noted by a local developer expert is the question of parkland dedications and communal septic beds. Each Township Official Plan has parkland dedication policies allowing the Township to request that up to 5% of the area of a residential subdivision or condominium development be conveyed to the Township for parkland purposes. South Frontenac, Central Frontenac and Frontenac Islands also qualify that land must be suitable for parkland. The relevant policy excerpts can be found in Appendix B. This is relevant to communal servicing, since most communal servicing technologies require an area of land that is used for sub-surface disposal, the surface of which may be covered by turf. Although this surface might seem ideal for passive recreational uses, and thus appropriate for parkland dedication purposes, because the land is encumbered, municipalities are not obligated
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 133 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 31
AGENDA ITEM #b)
to accept it. Municipalities with a higher population density (i.e. in the GTA) have struggled with the question of encumbered land. The risk is that if the sub-surface facilities need upgrades the surface parkland will need to be restored. The question of who should pay for this – the municipality, the current occupiers (e.g. a condo corporation) or the original developers – is a source of uncertainty. Parkland for stormwater ponds/facilities is generally not accepted as part of the 5% parkland dedication. If the Townships were to permit conveyance of the land above subsurface disposal beds for parkland dedication, they would reduce cost barriers to development. Some potential options are: 1)
Privately-owned public space (POPS): The municipality could enter into an agreement with the developer at the plan of subdivision stage to waive the parkland dedication requirement, and instead require development of the land above the dispersal system into a publicly accessible, but privately owned and maintained parkette. In this case, a clause would have to be included that the condo corporation (or, in the case of a residential facility like a nursing home, the owner/management company) would be responsible for rehabilitating the parkland in the case of subsurface repairs;
The municipality could accept the encumbered land, and accept the risk/responsibility for repairing the parkland in the case of subsurface repairs; and/or
The municipality could reduce or waive the parkland requirement which may act as another incentive for a developer to build using communal services.
5 COMMUNAL SERVICES BEST PRACTICES Attention to communal servicing has increased dramatically in the past several years. Despite the significant positive benefits of alternative approaches to water and wastewater servicing, relatively few Ontario examples exist. Attention to alternative servicing models comes from a few professional sources. One of these is “A Fresh Look: Alternative Servicing Models for Ontario’s Villages” (2016), prepared by McIntosh Perry Consulting for the Township of Rideau Lakes. “A Fresh Look” outlines alternative servicing models for Ontario villages, with a contextual focus on the Township of Rideau Lakes. As outlined in “A Fresh Look,” multiple levels must be considered when planning servicing: 1)
Technological – the technologies used to treat drinking water and wastewater
Planning – the structure and scale of the system
Management – ownership, financing and operations questions
A number of evolving technical options are available that provide possibilities for alternative servicing models. Advanced treatment units (ATUs) and package treatment plants are modular WSP June 2019 Page 32
Page 134 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
systems that allow advanced treatment at an on-site and communal scale. ATUs are scaled down mechanical and chemical treatment processes which can be added to a conventional septic system. Improvements in technology and new technologies such as membrane filters have resulted in the capability to incorporate all of the processes of a conventional large-scale treatment plant into a package that is easily transported and efficient to operate. A wide variety of modular type treatment options are available, which are cost-effective to purchase, can be installed quickly, and can easily be adapted to changing environmental regulations. Waterloo Biofilter, located in Guelph, and Premier Tech Aqua, in Riviere-du-Loup, are two local companies that provide these solutions. Further information on these technologies can be found in Appendix E. Communal systems connect a small number of users together to address their local needs and leverage their local servicing attributes. One of the strongest attributes of communal and decentralized servicing is its flexibility. Communal servicing is well suited to a range of development types, but installation of a communal servicing in one part of a Settlement Area or municipality does not preclude private on-site services in other areas where such an approach may be adequate. A range of financing, ownership and management models are appropriate for communal servicing systems, some of which are more suitable than others dependent on local factors. Private ownership and operation of communal servicing systems is an option that works well in many cases. County of Frontenac may prefer to take over ownership and operations of a communal system after it has been constructed by a private proponent. Communal systems can also be financed through various models. The authors of “A Fresh Look” recommend considering a range of options. They suggest that establishment of communal servicing can be considered a type of economic development program, and thus economic development tools like funding from the general property tax levy or the application of Community Improvement Plan tools like the Tax Increment Equivalent may be appropriate. Private pay-per-use financing models have worked for the Fetherstone Park development in North Grenville, while Oxford County has established a Community Servicing Assistance program where property owners who have obtained the benefit from municipal servicing pay into a fund to support new systems for only $10 per year.
POTENTIAL FOR RESOURCE RECOVERY Conventional wastewater management systems often reuse the biological sludge generated by the treatment process as an agricultural soil supplement. By and large, however, conventional wastewater management is based on the assumption that wastewater is only waste.29 Many alternative and innovative wastewater management approaches, by contrast, incorporate some
29 Gunilla Öberg, Maria G. Merlinzky, Alicia Lavalle, Margaret Morales and Melina M. Tobias, “The Notion of Sewage
as a Waste,” Ecology and Society 19, no.2 (2014). doi: 10.5751/ES-06531-190219 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 135 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 33
AGENDA ITEM #b)
level of resource recovery, which can lessen environmental impact.30 For example, recovering biogas from digesting waste generates energy and converts stronger greenhouse gasses into the less potent CO2.31 Systems that reuse greywater reduce water consumption and may lessen energy costs because less treatment is needed.32 Resources, like ammonia and fertilizer can be sold to offset treatment costs and can be used within the local economy. 33
LANDSCAPE-BASED Landscape-based solutions for wastewater treatment are a form of green infrastructure. Like other forms of green infrastructure, landscape-based wastewater treatment can be multifunctional, integrated, adaptable, resilient, and a producer of social, economic and ecological benefits.34 Some treatment approaches can realize direct ecological benefits by mimicking natural systems.35 That is, some landscape-based treatment approaches, like constructed wetlands, can add habitat, ecosystem function and diversity back into the landscape.36 Biological and landscape-based systems can also have lower energy costs.37 Advocates for these types of approaches argue that using biological processes, building in redundancy, and scaling-down systems have many benefits, from decreasing capital and operating costs, to re-engaging residents at the community level.
Figure 5-1: Example of emerging wastewater treatment technologies, PhytoLinksTM Modular Floating Treatment Wetland System for stormwater and wastewater applications (TerrapinWater)
30 T. Taylor and R. Goldstein, Sustainable Water Resources Management, Volume 3: Case Studies on New Water
Paradigm, (Report, Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, 2010). 31 S. Tilmans, A. Diax-Hernandex, E. Nyman and J. Davis, “The potential for financing small-scale wastewater treatment through resource recovery: experience from Bocas del Toro, Panama,” Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 4 no,3 (2014): 457. 32 Tjadraatmadja et al., “Rethinking urban water systems.” 33 T. A. Nanninga et al., “Discussion on Sustainable Water Technologies for Peri-Urban Areas of Mexico City: Balancing Urbanization and Environmental Conservation,” Water no.4 (2012) 34 R. Hansen and S. Pauleit, “From Multifunctionality to Multiple Ecosystem Services? A Conceptual Framework for Multifunctionality in Green Infrastructure Planning for Urban Areas,” Ambio 43 (2014). 35 D’Amato, V. E. Clerico, E. Dietzmann, E. Striano and M.K. Clark. Distributed Water Infrastructure for Sustainable Communities: A Guide for Decision Makers. (WERF Stock No. DEC3R06, Decentralized Water Resources Collaborative, http://www.ndwrcdp.org/): p5. 36 W. Thomas, “From waste to wetlands (Arcata, California),” Ecodecision, no.14 (1994). 37 D’Amato et al., “Distributed Water Infrastructure.” WSP June 2019 Page 34
Page 136 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6 ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES On-site sewage servicing is required when municipal sewage servicing is not available. The type of on-site sewage system can vary greatly, from a conventional sewage system (i.e. septic tank) to an advanced treatment system with membrane bioreactor technology. Discharge of sewage effluent to the natural environment can either be via surface disposal to a water body or ditch, or can be via subsurface disposal to the shallow groundwater regime beneath the site. The type of treatment and disposal system that is chosen to service a development will depend on many factors, including site soil characteristics, the presence of surface water features close to the site, design sewage flows, raw sewage strength, and effluent requirements. Appendix D includes Engineering Best Practices that provide a guideline for the planning, selection, and design of a communal on-site sewage treatment and disposal system. Best practices for installation, operation, and maintenance are also discussed. It should be noted that these best practices are not intended to be all-inclusive and require professional judgement in their use. For all sewage systems, appropriate government approvals will be required prior to construction and/or use of the system. More detailed information on the following engineering considerations is included in Appendix D: •
Site evaluation;
•
Soil evaluation;
•
Planning and design of communal sewage systems, including daily design sewage flows, flow balancing, and the approvals process;
•
Peer review;
•
Wastewater strength;
•
Determining the treatment and disposal method;
•
Surface discharge;
•
Subsurface disposal systems;
•
Installation and commissioning of communal sewage systems; and
•
Monitoring, operation, and maintenance considerations.
7 FINANCIAL MODEL AND RISK MITIGATION In the context of ongoing regional and local municipal development, the County must balance its desire to encourage installation of innovative, cost-effective communal water and wastewater facilities with the need to ensure all communal services are maintained in a serviceable
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 137 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 35
AGENDA ITEM #b)
condition. Specifically, residential and commercial units relying upon communal services must be safe to inhabit at all times, in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Guideline D-5-2. WSP developed an Excel-based cashflow Financial Model to be used by the County as a tool for estimating appropriate charges to cover anticipated annualized costs and mitigate financial risk associated with communal services. The Model was built as a high-level ‘what-if’ tool, enabling the user to input costs, development size, and other parameters, in order to understand the funding required to reach steady-state (i.e., stable) annual charges. The Model was structured to assess the following annualized costs as a function of a user-input initial capital cost, service type, and development phasing: •
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs;
•
Rehabilitation costs;
•
Eventual capital replacement costs;
•
Insurance costs; and
•
‘Catastrophe costs’ related to unplanned and unexpected major expenses not covered by insurance.
The Model allows for an evaluation period of up to 30 years, on the basis that most water and wastewater equipment has a lifecycle of 30 years or less. Two funding sources were identified and incorporated into the Model: a utility fee levied upon residential and commercial customers of the planned communal system; and a property tax increase levied upon all property owners in the County. Modelled cost-recovery options include: •
Option 1: Utility fee covers all costs;
•
Option 2: Property tax covers catastrophe costs; utility fee covers remainder;
•
Option 3: Property tax covers catastrophe and capital replacement costs; utility fee covers all other costs; or
•
Option 4: Property tax covers all costs.
The Model allows for calculation and allocation of costs associated with construction of residential and/or commercial units.
7.1
ASSUMPTIONS
The Model makes the following assumptions: • The Model evaluates costs associated with a single development (i.e. one communal system) and allows for up to eight (8) phases of development;
WSP June 2019 Page 36
Page 138 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Initial construction capital costs are paid upfront by the developer or the County, or some combination therein as stipulated by the Model user. However, depending on the Model Option selected, there is an option to have unit owners bear responsibility for initial construction costs through repayment of a loan;
•
It was assumed that the County of Frontenac, rather than the Townships, would be responsible for appropriate communal system operation, and property tax calculations were estimated at the County (rather than Township) level;
•
In the Model, the user is enabled to input a period of time (e.g. five (5) years), during which the developer is assumed to provide surety (bonding) for the communal system. This indicates that the County would have a period of time at the commencement of operations of a new development during which any system failures would be addressed by the developer at no cost to the County, or, in the event that the developer fails to meet its obligations, the developer’s bonding agency. This allows for a period during which revenues held against catastrophic system failures can accrue before any risk of system failure is imposed upon the County;
•
The Model assumes that O&M costs associated with the communal system are paid by the developer from the time operation begins, until development occupancy (i.e. number of units sold) reaches a user-defined threshold (e.g. 70% of units). However, O&M fees are still levied upon residential and commercial property owners during these early years. In essence, developer-paid O&M costs simply lower the lifecycle cost obligations of residential and commercial property owners, as well as the County-wide property tax base;
•
Long-term ownership of a communal system will be held by either a condominium corporation or the County. In the event that the system is owned by a condominium corporation, it is assumed that the County will create a by-law requiring O&M activities to be conducted by a qualified third-party system operator in perpetuity;
•
Units sold are assumed to be sold and occupied on January 1st of any given year;
•
Failure rates are assumed to be the same for every development, and the same for every year of operation; and
•
All calculations are conducted and expressed in real 2017 dollars (CAD). Summary results are also provided in year-of-expenditure dollars (CAD).
7.2
METHODOLOGY
Fundamentally, the Model enables the user to input parameters (‘one-time’ inputs) specific to a hypothetical or planned communal water/wastewater system, and to select one of the four costCOUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 139 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 37
AGENDA ITEM #b)
recovery options described herein. The Model then runs these user inputs through a series of calculations to estimate communal system annualized lifecycle costs, and allocate payment responsibility. The steps in the modelling process are described below.
STEP 1: USER INPUT The first step in the modelling process requires the user to enter an array of ‘one-time’ inputs, such as an estimated inflation rate, as well as time-series inputs, such as estimated development occupancy rates by year. User inputs required to run the Model are shown in Table 7-1. Table 7-1: Financial Model User Inputs Required
USER INPUTS •
Model (fee) scenario selection
•
Inflation rate
•
Interest rate
•
Capital costs
•
Likelihood of failure
•
Annualized costs as a function of capital costs
•
Construction dates and capital costs associated with other developments using communal systems in the County of Frontenac
•
Risk tolerance (likelihood of having sufficient funding available to address any unexpected catastrophic failures not covered by insurance)
•
Property area per typical existing residential unit (i.e. for conventional well/septic construction)
•
Estimated revenue leakage rates
•
Development construction dates
•
Development area and number of residential and commercial units
•
Anticipated water usage (flow) rates
•
Occupancy rates and dates
•
Property values and property tax rates
•
Surface vs. subsurface operation
•
Communal system ‘seed’ funding (i.e. an initial borrow to enable minimum, stabilized annual fees while achieving required minimum reserve fund balance)
WSP June 2019 Page 38
Page 140 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
USER INPUTS •
Construction dates and capital costs associated with other developments using communal systems in the County of Frontenac
•
Property value per typical existing residential unit (i.e. for conventional well/septic construction)
•
Initial hookup fee per unit
STEP 2: CATASTROPHE COST CALCULATION This step estimates risk-adjusted costs associated with unexpected, catastrophic failure of one or more communal water/wastewater systems in the County. As described in Section 7, ‘Catastrophe’ costs are those which are not planned for as part of routine O&M, rehabilitation, or capital replacement, nor covered by typical water / wastewater facility insurance policies.
1 34 67 100 133 166 199 232 265 298 331 364 397 430 463
Based on a user-defined annualized likelihood of failure of a ‘typical’ communal system, the probability of catastrophic failure (‘failure’) is calculated for up to 20 communal systems in the County, where one of the systems is the hypothetical communal system under consideration in the Model, and the other systems (as few as zero, or as many as 19) are existing communal systems in other developments in the County. The calculation of expected Catastrophe costs incorporates consideration of other communal systems in the County on the basis that the incremental reserve funding needed to protect against failure is reduced for every successive communal system. In other words, Catastrophe cost reserve fund obligations are closer to logarithmic than linear with respect to the number of communal systems in operation.
Logarithmic Scale
Linear Scale
Figure 7-1: Logarithmic vs. Linear Scale
The Model assumes that failure events are independent of one another (i.e. failure of a communal system at one development is assumed to be irrelevant with respect to likelihood of failure at another development). Failure events are also assumed to be independent of facility age, on the basis that proper O&M is assumed throughout the full lifecycle of the system being
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 141 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 39
AGENDA ITEM #b)
proposed, regardless of the duration of that lifecycle. Based on user-defined construction dates for each development, the likelihood of having one or more failures during each year in the Model evaluation period is calculated. The number of communal system failures in the Model evaluation period is then compared against a user-input risk-tolerance level to determine how many failures should be budgeted for during the evaluation period. The risk-tolerance level is intended to represent the certainty of the County having sufficient funding set aside based on the anticipated number of failures during the Model evaluation period. An example is shown in Table 7-2. Table 7-2: Example Communal System Catastrophic Failure Likelihood and Risk Tolerance
RISK-TOLERANCE LEVEL User-defined risk tolerance Likelihood of 0 Communal System Failures Likelihood of 1 or fewer Communal System Failures Likelihood of 2 or fewer Communal System Failures Likelihood of 3 or fewer Communal System Failures
LIKELIHOOD THROUGHOUT MODEL EVALUATION PERIOD 99% 4% 88% 99.7% 99.99%
In the above example, the County would budget for two communal system failures, on the basis that: •
There is an 88% chance of having no more than one failure.
•
There is a 99.7% chance of having no more than two failures.
•
The risk tolerance is set at 99%, indicating a desire to have a 99% chance of having enough funding available to account for anticipated failures. Budgeting for one failure is anticipated to have only an 88% chance of ensuring that sufficient funding is set aside. Budgeting for two failures indicates the likelihood of having sufficient funding set aside is 99.7%.
Once an appropriate number of failures to budget for has been determined by the County, the Model determines the cost associated with a given failure. The Model builds in a cost-recovery mechanism to fund eventual communal system replacement at the end of service life, as discussed herein. As such, to understand the direct
WSP June 2019 Page 40
Page 142 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
financial liability associated with catastrophic failure,38 the Model computes the outstanding, or unfunded, capital cost to replace each communal system (i.e. the hypothetical system being modelled, as well as any other existing communal systems defined by the user). This outstanding capital cost is based on total capital replacement costs, as defined by the user, an assumed replacement-cost recovery rate.39 The Model then ranks each communal system, from highest to lowest, based on its outstanding capital replacement cost. To provide a conservative estimate of the required catastrophic failure budget, the Model assumes that failures occur at the systems with the largest outstanding replacement costs. A budget to cover catastrophic failures is then calculated for use during later steps in the Model.
STEP 3: FLOW RATE CALCULATION This step calculates expected annual water use (volume) for residential and commercial units, based on user-defined anticipated occupancy rates, unit sizes, and daily flow rates. Total annual water use is calculated, as is the percentage of total annual water attributed to residential units vs. commercial units.
STEP 4: PROPERTY VALUE CALCULATION This step calculates residential and commercial property values in the modelled development to understand the implications for the County’s total real estate valuation, and annual property tax revenue.
STEP 5: CAPITAL, O&M, REHABILITATION, AND INSURANCE COST CALCULATION Based on user-defined capital costs for the hypothetical development’s communal system, O&M costs, major rehabilitation costs, insurance costs, and eventual system replacement costs are estimated. O&M, rehabilitation, insurance, and eventual replacement costs are defined as a fixed percentage of initial capital costs, and O&M costs are scaled to reflect occupancy rates estimated by the Model user. The Model user is able to adjust the fixed percentages within the Model parameter input process.
38
The Model budgets only for costs associated with replacement of the existing communal system. The Model does not budget for any legal or indirect financial liability associated with catastrophic failure, including damage to property, property market values, environmental damage, harm to residents, etc. 39 The replacement-cost recovery rate is predicated on stabilized fees throughout the lifecycle of each communal system, indicating that a portion of fees collected annually from system users is held in reserve to apply against eventual communal system replacement costs. For example, if a communal system were to fail on its first day of operation, it is assumed that 100% of its eventual replacement cost is outstanding, whereas a communal system failing halfway through its anticipated lifespan would be expected to have only 50% of its replacement cost outstanding. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 143 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 41
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Each cost category is calculated and presented as a set of annualized values and a total lifecycle cost.
STEP 6: RAW RESERVE FUND CALCULATION Once costs and flow rates are established, the Model calculates raw (i.e. unstabilized) annualized reserve fund contributions required to sustain the hypothetical communal system. It is assumed that all costs associated with the communal system are paid for out of a development-specific reserve fund (apart from initial capital costs which are not considered in the Model, as discussed in Section 7.1). All Utility Fees and Property Tax funds which go to supporting the modelled communal system are thus treated as contributions to the reserve fund. Cost obligations are apportioned as dictated by whichever Model Funding Option is selected by the user (refer to earlier in this section for discussion of funding options). At this step in the Model, cost obligations are split into: •
Developer obligations (in the early years of the development, before the user-defined critical occupancy level has been reached, as discussed in Section 7.1);
•
Utility Fee obligations; and
•
Property Tax obligations.
Because reserve fund contributions are not stabilized, annual reserve fund contributions are set to match anticipated annual expenditures, creating substantial variation in fees/rates paid per year. This is addressed in the following steps.
STEP 7: STABILIZED UTILITY FEE AND PROPERTY TAX CALCULATIONS Using the cost obligations and annual expenditures summarized under Step 6, stabilized Utility Fees and Property Tax increases are established. Fees / taxes are set such that rates are consistent throughout the Model evaluation period, the reserve fund balance always meets or exceeds the minimum required balance, and the reserve fund balance at the end of the Model evaluation period is equal to the minimum required balance. Stabilization has two primary benefits. First, stabilization enables the communal system owner to charge users a consistent unit rate40 throughout the lifespan of the asset, providing property owners with a predictable and equitable rate. Second, notwithstanding the need to generate and reserve capital to cover potential Catastrophe costs as described above, stabilization facilitates slow, steady accumulation of rehabilitation and eventual replacement funds. This increases the likelihood that the communal system owner will successfully collect the required user fees and
40 Notwithstanding inflation, which is generally not reflected in this Model (units are presented in 2017 dollars (CAD)).
WSP June 2019 Page 42
Page 144 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
property taxes in a given year, and reduces the likelihood and magnitude of revenue leakage (i.e. non-payment). The need to maintain a minimum reserve fund balance to address potential system failures (Catastrophe costs) tends to place significant cost obligations early in the communal system lifecycle. The most efficient and equitable means of overcoming this initial cost obligation is to provide the reserve fund with ‘seed’ funding – a one-time, up-front contribution of funds – borrowed from another funding source, whether that source is a bank, another County account, or similar.
STEP 8: INDUCED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CALCULATION One of the primary benefits of communal system implementation rather than conventional well / septic implementation is the opportunity to increase development density. This step of the Model calculates induced property tax revenue based on the expectation that the County’s property tax net revenue will increase on a per-area basis as development density increases. Induced property tax revenue for a given land area was therefore calculated as the difference between tax revenue anticipated under a communal system scenario, which assumes a userdefined density of units, and tax revenue anticipated under a user-defined conventional well / septic development density. This calculation assumes property tax rates are equal under the communal system and conventional scenarios.
STEP 9: SUMMARY The final step in the modelling process is to summarize the results in a series of tables and charts. Sample outputs from the model, as well as a Basic User Guide, are included in Appendix F.
8 CONCLUSION This Study has affirmed the major potential benefits of communal servicing approaches for the County, developers and residents. To reiterate:
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR THE COUNTY BY ENABLING: •
Increased development potential, growing the tax base;
•
More water-sensitive design and other approaches to meet sustainability objectives;
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 145 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 43
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
A broader range of housing typologies and commercial development to allow for complete communities;
•
Reduced municipal service delivery costs to residents (e.g. garbage collection, snow removal); and
•
A new approach to managing risk.
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR DEVELOPERS BY INCREASING: •
Flexibility to address different market segments;
•
Range of feasible servicing approaches for hard-to-service areas; and
•
Guidance and certainty.
COMMUNAL SERVICING WORKS FOR RESIDENTS BY ENSURING THAT RESIDENTS: •
Can be confident in their water and wastewater treatment systems;
•
Have a wider choice of housing options, allowing aging in place; and
•
Can be confident that water resources are being appropriately stewarded.
The Study also identifies engineering best practices for designing communal wastewater systems, responding to regulatory and legislative requirements for such systems. General considerations and design principles set the framework for how such systems must be designed and how approvals must be sought. Within this framework, each individual system must be designed based on site characteristics, intended development, and local objectives. Appropriate and thoughtful design at the planning and design phase will ensure that water conservation is maximised, environmental impact is minimised and that the system is durable and efficient. Given the complexity and technical nature of wastewater treatment systems, the County can ensure good design by instituting a peer review process. The Study’s Financial Model provides a high-level ‘what-if’ tool enabling the user to estimate the funding required to reach steady-state (i.e. stable) annual charges to cover anticipated annualized costs and mitigate financial risk associated with communal services. As such, there are no system- or development-specific conclusions to be drawn. However, the following general trends were observed when testing hypothetical developments using the Model: •
Catastrophe cost reserve fund obligations are closer to logarithmic than linear with respect to the number of communal systems in operation. This indicates that the amount of funding which needs to be held in reserve in case of system failure is expected to drop sharply on a per-system basis when the number of systems in operation rises;
WSP June 2019 Page 44
Page 146 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Annual property tax increases are non-existent under Option 1, and are minimal under Options 2 and 3, increasing between $1 to $10 per unit per year, depending on the size of the development; and
•
User fees of ~$100 per month ($1,200 per year) are likely feasible under Options 2 and 3, depending on the scale, cost, and development parameters.
With population growth comes development pressures and the need to consider where and how development can be accommodated and serviced, while maintaining and enhancing the vitality and livability of the County’s villages and hamlets as rural community hubs with a distinct sense of place. The implementation of communal services can position the County and Townships as leaders in accommodating growth, providing a diversity of housing options to meet community needs, and revitalizing village and hamlet mainstreets towards achieving planning and economic development objectives.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 147 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page 45
AGENDA ITEM #b)
This page left intentionally blank
WSP June 2019 Page 46
Page 148 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
A
FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Page 149 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 150 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
FEDERAL CANADA WASTEWATER SYSTEMS EFFLUENT REGULATIONS, SOR/2012-139 FISHERIES ACT These regulations set limits on effluent for a number of deleterious substances, including carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD), total suspended solids (TSS), residual chlorine, and un-ionized ammonia. However, Ontario had already published minimum standards in 1983 that were equivalent to or exceeded the more recent federal requirements.41
PROVINCIAL PLANNING ACT The Planning Act establishes the rules for land use planning in Ontario and describes how land uses may be controlled in the province’s communities. The Planning Act gives Ontario municipalities the power to make certain decisions about water and wastewater servicing. However, Section 2, “Provincial Interest”, excerpted below, also identifies sewage and water systems as a matter of provincial interest. “[…] the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as […] (h) the adequate provision and efficient use of […] sewage and water […] systems.” Subsection (5) “Prohibition of use of land, etc., availability of municipal services” of Section 34 “Zoning Bylaws”, excerpted below, empowers municipalities to ensure that development occurs only after the municipality is confident in the water and wastewater servicing is adequate: “A by-law passed under paragraph 1 or 2 of subsection (1) or a predecessor of that paragraph may prohibit the use of land or the erection or use of buildings or structures unless such municipal services as may be set out in the by-law are available to service the land, buildings or structures, as the case may be.”
41
ECO, Redefining Conservation, (ECO 2009/2010 Annual Report, Toronto, ON: Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, 2010). COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 151 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-1
AGENDA ITEM #b)
More generally, Section 70.3, “Regulations re sewage and water services,” and associated regulations permit municipalities to pass bylaws governing the allocation of water and sewer services for plans of subdivision. This section states: “The Lieutenant Governor in Council may by regulation authorize municipalities to pass by-laws establishing a system for allocating sewage and water services to land that is the subject of an application under section 51 upon such conditions as may be set out in the regulation.”
PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT, 2014 Under Section 3 “Policy Statements,” of the Planning Act, the Province may issue policy statements on matters of provincial interest. The most recent Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) came into effect on April 30, 2014 and provides policy directions regarding intensification, rural land, settlement areas and environmental sustainability that are directly relevant to communal servicing and its implications. The PPS directs that future growth and development be focused within designated settlement areas, defined in the Definitions section as: “[…] urban areas and rural settlement areas within municipalities (such as cities, towns, villages and hamlets) that are: a) built up areas where development is concentrated and which have a mix of land uses; and b) lands which have been designated in an official plan for development over the long term planning horizon provided for in policy 1.1.2. In cases where land in designated growth areas is not available, the settlement area may be no larger than the area where development is concentrated.” In Section 1.2 Coordination, policy 1.2.1, excerpted below directs that the vitality and regeneration of rural settlement areas shall be promoted. “A coordinated, integrated and comprehensive approach should be used when dealing with planning matters within municipalities, across lower, single and/or upper-tier municipal boundaries, and with other orders of government, agencies and boards including: d) infrastructure […] and waste management systems; e) ecosystem, shoreline, watershed, and Great Lakes related issues; […]”
WSP June 2019 Page A-2
Page 152 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
One of the significant challenges to implementing communal servicing is the implicit and explicit servicing hierarchy set out in Sections 1.6, “Infrastructure and Public Service Facilities,” policies 1.6.6.2, 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4, and 1.6.6.5. Municipal services are preferred, and intensification and redevelopment on those services is preferable. Where these don’t exist, private communal services are acceptable. Individual on-site systems are permitted where municipal or communal services are not provided, subject to adequate site conditions. Finally, partial services are only permitted to address failed on-site services, or for infilling or rounding out of existing development. The distinction between municipal services and private communal services is particularly important for this Study. It is often assumed that municipal services are conventional centralized systems and not communal systems that serve individual developments. However, the definition of municipal services is not provided. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, which does not apply to the County of Frontenac, defines municipal wastewater systems as “any sewage works owned or operated by a municipality.” Therefore, it is important to consider that communal services owned or operated by the municipality, that help to achieve the other objectives of the PPS, are not in conflict with the hierarchy set out in Sections 1.6.6. These policies are: 1.6.6.2 “Municipal sewage services and municipal water services are the preferred form of servicing for settlement areas. Intensification and redevelopment within settlement areas on existing municipal sewage services and municipal water services should be promoted, wherever feasible.” 1.6.6.3 “Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services are not provided, municipalities may allow the use of private communal sewage services and private communal water services.” 1.6.6.4 “Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water servicesare not provided, individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services may be used provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. In settlement areas, these services may only be used for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development.” 1.6.6.5 “Partial services shall only be permitted in the following circumstances: a) where they are necessary to address failed individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services in existing development; or b) within settlement areas, to allow for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development on partial services provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 153 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The most important goals for sewage and water services are sustainability, feasibility and safety. Integration of servicing, land-use policy and development are critical to properly achieve these goals. These priorities are highlighted in policy 1.6.6.1, excerpted below: “Planning for sewage and water services shall: […] (b) ensure that these systems are provided in a manner that:
- can be sustained by the water resources upon which such services rely;
- is feasible, financially viable and complies with all regulatory requirements; and
- protects human health and the natural environment; (c) promote water conservation and water use efficiency; (d) integrate servicing and land use considerations at all stages of the planning process; and, (e) be in accordance with the servicing hierarchy outlined through policies 1.6.6.2, 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4 and 1.6.6.5.” Approaches to determining adequate wastewater treatment capacity for a development are not legislated – instead, design guidelines and the professional opinion of the engineers are used. Nevertheless, policy 1.6.6.6 emphasizes the importance of ensuring adequate treatment capacity: “Subject to the hierarchy of services provided in policies 1.6.6.2, 1.6.6.3, 1.6.6.4 and 1.6.6.5 planning authorities may allow lot creation only if there is confirmation of sufficient reserve sewage system capacity and reserve water system capacity within municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services. The determination of sufficient reserve sewage system capacity shall include treatment capacity for hauled sewage from private communal sewage services and individual on-site sewage services.” Protection of water resources and aquatic ecosystems is a significant goal of the PPS. In particular, water quantity and quality should be protected using a watershed-level scale for longterm planning. Municipalities should also use planning to encourage water conservation, and long-term sustainable use of water resources, as directed by policy 2.2.1, under Section 2.2 “Water”. “Planning authorities shall protect, improve or restore the quality and quantity of water by: a) using the watershed as the ecologically meaningful scale for integrated and longterm planning, which can be a foundation for considering cumulative impacts of development;
WSP June 2019 Page A-4
Page 154 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
b)
minimizing potential negative impacts, including cross-jurisdictional and crosswatershed impacts; […]
f)
planning for efficient and sustainable use of water resources, through practices for water conservation and sustaining water quality[.]”
Policies related to efficient land use (1.1.1) in settlement areas (1.1.3) and rural lands (1.1.4) have general applicability to communal servicing. Development should use land efficiently to minimize the conversion of agricultural or natural heritage land. In particular, infill and redevelopment of vacant land within settlement areas should be promoted. The mix of densities and land uses in settlement areas should make efficient use of infrastructure and support active transportation. The PPS directs that future growth and development be focused within designated settlement areas, and that the vitality and regeneration of rural settlement areas shall be promoted. Within the County, the rural settlement areas and waterfront areas do not have municipal water and wastewater services, with the exception of the Village of Sydenham in the Township of South Frontenac which has municipal water supply. Consequently, development under the current planning framework must usually proceed on private services, resulting in limited potential for intensification in the settlement areas due to the minimum lot sizes required to support private services and low-density forms of development. Communal servicing, which allows higher lot densities and potential for infill in settlement areas, would help to achieve the broad and specific goals of the PPS, particularly as outlined in Sections 1.1.1, 1.1.3 and 1.1.4.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT, CONSOLIDATED MARCH 2018 The purpose of this Act is to provide for the protection and conservation of the natural environment, as outlined in Section 3 of Part I of the Act. It applies to this Study in numerous ways. Most directly, through Section 9 (1) “Approval, plant or production process”, the Environmental Protection Act requires that any activity that discharges waste to the environment must receive an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA), issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. This text reads as follows: “No person shall, except under and in accordance with an environmental compliance approval, (a) use, operate, construct, alter, extend or replace any plant, structure, equipment, apparatus, mechanism or thing that may discharge or from which may be discharged a contaminant into any part of the natural environment other than water; or (b) alter a process or rate of production with the result that a contaminant may be discharged into any part of the natural environment other than water or the rate or
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 155 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
manner of discharge of a contaminant into any part of the natural environment other than water may be altered. 2010, c. 16, Sched. 7, s. 2 (4).” Further clarification on the need for approval is included in Part II, Section 20.2 “Application for Approval, cited below: (1) “A person may apply to the Director for approval to engage in an activity mentioned in subsection 9 (1) or 27 (1) of this Act or subsection 53 (1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act if the activity has not been prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of subsection 20.21 (1). 2010, c. 16, Sched. 7, s. 2 (15).” (7) Sewage works “If a person applies for approval to use, operate, establish, alter, extend or replace a sewage works, the application may also be for approval to engage in any activity that is mentioned in subsection 9 (1) or 27 (1) that is related to the sewage works unless the Director requires otherwise. 2010, c. 16, Sched. 7, s. 2 (15).” The need for an ECA is equally triggered by Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, “Approval, sewage works,” as described in Section 3.5 of this Study. The ECA process itself is reviewed in a subsequent section. Additionally, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, through the Act, is given the power to conduct research related to pollution, environmental quality and innovative waste disposal systems. Specifically: Part I Section 4 “The Minister has the power to: — Investigate pollution and waste management problems, — Conduct research related to contaminants, pollution, waste management and waste disposal, — Conduct studies of the quality of the natural environment and monitoring programs; — Make grants and loans for research and training related to pollution; planning, operating, developing, improving and enlarging waste management systems; and, programs to encourage the reduction of waste; — (h) Establish and operate demonstration and experimental sewage systems under Part VIII.” The general regulatory powers outlined in Section 175.1 allow the Lieutenant Governor in council to exempt, prohibit, govern and require the payment of fees to the Crown in regards to sewage systems, among others. Part V of the Environmental Protection Act requires an approval for land application of untreated septage. This is an important factor for municipal management of biosolids.
WSP June 2019 Page A-6
Page 156 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ONTARIO WATER RESOURCES ACT, CONSOLIDATED APRIL 2018 The Ontario Water Resources Act provides for the conservation, protection and management of Ontario’s water and for their efficient and sustainable use, in order to promote Ontario’s longterm environmental, social and economic well-being. The Definitions section gives the following definitions: “ ‘sewage’ includes drainage, storm water, commercial wastes and industrial wastes and such other matter or substance as is specified by the regulations; (“eaux d’égout”)” “ ‘sewage works’ means any works for the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal of sewage or any part of such works, but does not include plumbing to which the Building Code Act, 1992 applies; […]” One of the major sources of risk for municipalities is contained in Section 16, “Order by provincial officer: contraventions,” of the Act. The OWRA grants the Minister (Director) significant powers to intervene in sewage works that it deems unsafe or failed. Following Section 16, a provincial officer may issue an order to a person in contravention of a provision of the Act or regulations. Under subsection (3), “What order may require,” the order may require: “(d) the repair, maintenance or operation of water works or sewage works in such manner and with such facilities as are specified in the order; (e) the removal of sewage or any thing contaminated by sewage; (f) sampling, analysis or reporting with respect to the quality or quantity of any waters; (g) where the contravention has caused damage to or endangered or is likely to cause damage to or endanger existing water supplies, providing temporary or permanent alternate water supplies;” The Director also has powers to require repair or rehabilitation to environmental resources that were damaged by wastewater treatment failure. Section 32 “Where, in the opinion of a Director, it is in the public interest to do so, the Director, by order, may require a person who owns, manages or has control of a sewage works, water works or other facility which may discharge material into a water or watercourse that may impair the quality of the water, to do any one or more of the following: 1.
To have available at all times, or during the periods specified in the order, the equipment, material and personnel specified in the order at the locations specified in the order to prevent, reduce or alleviate any impairment of the quality of the water or the effects of any impairment of the quality of the water.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 157 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-7
AGENDA ITEM #b)
To obtain, construct and install or modify the devices, equipment and facilities specified in the order at the locations and in the manner specified in the order.
To implement the procedures specified in the order.
To take all steps necessary to ensure that the procedures specified in the order will be implemented in the event that a water or watercourse becomes impaired or may become impaired.
To monitor and record the quality and quantity of any water specified in the order and to report thereon to the Director.
To study and to report to the Director upon, i.
measures to control the discharge into a water or watercourse of a material specified in the order,
ii.
the effects of the discharge into a water or watercourse of a material specified in the order,
iii.
the water or watercourse into which a material specified in the order may be discharged.”
Environmental Compliance Approval Section 53, “Approval, sewage works” of the Act triggers the need for ECA, just as the Environmental Protection Act does. Part (I) of this section reads: “Subject to section 47.3 of the Environmental Protection Act, no person shall use, operate, establish, alter, extend or replace new or existing sewage works except under and in accordance with an environmental compliance approval.” Section 53, subsection (6), “Exceptions” provides more detailed information on the type of works which do not require an ECA. While all communal sewage works would require an ECA, there are some potentially relevant exceptions that may allow more flexible approaches to communal servicing. One potentially relevant exception is in clause (b): “A privately-owned sewage works designed for the partial treatment of sewage that is to drain or be discharged into a sanitary sewer;” This could potentially ease the regulatory complexity of a greywater or partial treatment system intended to discharge into a communal system, as only an ECA for the communal system would be necessary. Appeals to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) are addressed in Section 55 “Sewage works established or extended within a municipality”. The relevant subsections read as follows:
WSP June 2019 Page A-8
Page 158 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
“Application to L.P.A.T.” (4) “If a registration under Part II.2 of the Environmental Protection Act is in effect or an environmental compliance approval has been issued in respect of the establishment or extension of a sewage treatment works by a person, other than a municipality, of sewage treatment works within a municipality the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal may, on application by the person undertaking the establishment or extension, order the amendment of any by-law for prohibiting or regulating the use of land or structures for dumping or disposing of garbage, refuse or domestic or industrial waste passed under the Municipal Act, 2001, the City of Toronto Act, 2006 or a predecessor of those Acts or any by-law passed under section 34 of the Planning Act or any official plan to permit the use of land for the establishment or extension.” “Powers of L.P.A.T.” (5) “The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, as a condition of making an order under subsection (4), may impose such restrictions, limitations and conditions respecting the use of land for the establishment or extension of the sewage treatment works not inconsistent with the regulations made for the purposes of Part II.2 of the Environmental Protection Act or the terms and conditions in the environmental compliance approval, as to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal may appear necessary or expedient.” Section 62 “Report by Director, water or sewage works,” of the Ontario Water Resources Act has great relevance for communal servicing, because it must be referenced in any Municipal Responsibility Agreement. It states: 62 (1) “Where a Director reports in writing to the clerk of a municipality that he or she is of the opinion that it is necessary in the public interest that water works or sewage works or any part thereof be established, maintained, operated, improved, extended, enlarged, altered, repaired or replaced, the municipality shall forthwith do every act and thing in its power to implement the report of the Director.” (2) If the municipality fails to do everything in its power to implement the report forthwith after receiving it, and the time for taking an appeal has passed or there has been a final disposition of an appeal confirming or altering the report, the Director, with the approval of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, may direct that whatever is necessary to implement the report or the report as confirmed or altered be done at the expense of the municipality, and may arrange for the Agency to do it.” (3) The Minister or the Agency may recover the expense incurred in implementing the report, with costs, by action in a court of competent jurisdiction, as a debt due to the Crown or the Agency, as the case may be, by the municipality[.]”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 159 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-9
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT, 1990 The Environmental Assessment Act generally only applies to public bodies. Municipalities constructing or expanding municipal servicing must generally undertake a Schedule “C” Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA). Class EAs offer standardized processes to follow when planning and designing a project. With respect to wastewater projects, this process is often combined with application for an ECA, and can give the proponent peace of mind that due diligence has been done. Section 5, “Approval for Undertaking,” of the Act applies to Provincial agencies or bodies and to municipalities. However, it also still may apply to private developers, as per subsection (b) and (c), below. Section 3 “Application of Act” “This Act Applies to, (a) enterprises or activities or proposals, plans or programs in respect of enterprises or activities by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Ontario or by a public body or public bodies or by a municipality or municipalities; (b) major commercial or business enterprises or activities or proposals, plans or programs in respect of major commercial or business enterprises or activities of a person or persons, other than a person referred to in clause (a), designated by the regulations[.] (c) an enterprise or activity or a proposal, plan or program in respect of an enterprise or activity of a person or persons, other than a person or persons referred to in clause (a), if an agreement is entered into under section 3.0.1 in respect of the enterprise, activity, proposal, plan or program.” Section 3.0.1 allows non-public bodies to enter into a written agreement with the Minister (MECP) to follow the applicable Class EA. O. Reg 345/93 (below) specifies how private proponents are to proceed under the Act. O. Reg. 345/93: Environmental Assessment Act – Designation and Exemption—Private Sector Developers “1. In this Regulation, “private sector developer” means a developer of land other than land belonging to Her Majesty in right of Ontario, a public body or a municipality. 2. (1) An enterprise or activity by a private sector developer is defined as a major commercial or business enterprise or activity and is designated as an undertaking to which the Act applies if it is, (a) of a type listed in Schedule C of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment that was approved on October 4, 2000 under section 9 of the Act; and (b) a project provided for residents of a municipality for roads, water or wastewater.
WSP June 2019 Page A-10
Page 160 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
(2) An undertaking designated under subsection (1) is exempt from section 5 of the Act if, (a) no other environmental assessment has been submitted to the Minister; and (b) the procedure for the undertaking is set out in the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment and its approval does not require a further approval under section 5 of the Act. […]” Essentially, this regulation means that private sector proponents who plan to construct water or wastewater project either on their own behalf (private communal services) or for a municipality (the municipality will assume ownership/operation) must follow the Schedule ‘C’ Municipal Class EA.42 An exception is if the project would be a Schedule “A” project under the MEA process, or a Schedule “B” project, or a project that is subject to approvals under the Planning Act.43
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ACT, 2002 The Nutrient Management Act provides for the management of materials containing nutrients in ways that will enhance protection of the natural environment and provide a sustainable future for agricultural operations and rural development. Specifically, the Act sets out provisions for the management of materials containing nutrients and regulations respecting farm animals, such as standards respecting the management of materials containing nutrients used by, and on agricultural operations or used for other uses. Specifically, O. Reg. 267/03 prohibits land application of untreated septage (biosolids) in accordance with approval issued under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act.
SUSTAINABLE WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEMS ACT, 2002 This Act applies only to municipally-owned systems. Its intent is to support full-cost accounting and full-cost recovery for Ontario’s publicly owned water systems. It requires that municipalities develop a financial plan for any owned water works to inform the setting of municipal water rates, and encourages the same for wastewater systems.
MECP DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR SEWAGE WORKS, 2008 The MECP’s Design Guidelines for Sewage Works outlines specific design guidelines and/or procedures in the design of sewage works and in the engineering review of applications for
42 Municipal Engineers Association, “Part A – Class EA Planning Process, A.3.3 Proponency,” in Municipal Class
Environmental Assessment, 2015. http://www.municipalclassea.ca/manual/page5.html 43 Municipal Engineers Association, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment – Companion Guide (rev01), September 2017. https://www.ogra.org/files/MCEA%20Companion%20Guide%202017.pdf COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 161 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-11
AGENDA ITEM #b)
approval of such systems. However, legislation, including legislated standards and regulations, takes precedence over the Design Guidelines and must be followed. Preliminary Design Studies for New/Experimental Systems “Where the proposed system incorporates processes for which established guidelines are not available, or include equipment and materials where no reliable data from full scale operation are available (e.g., processes that are new or in development - Section 3.9 -Technology Development), the following information may also be needed depending on the scope and risks involved in the project: — All available data pertaining to the proposed process, equipment, or material; — Results of any testing programs which have been undertaken by independent testing agencies, research foundations and universities; — Identification of any known full-scale applications of the proposed process/equipment/material, including a description of the type of application and the name and address of the person who could be contacted for technical information on the application; — Discussion of the impact of the potential failure of the proposed process/equipment/material and identification of the measures proposed — to be undertaken to prevent or remedy any health hazard or noncompliance as a result of such failure; proposed contingencies to modify or replace the proposed process, equipment or material in case of their failure and liabilities associated with the proposal; — Description of the monitoring, testing and reporting program proposed to be undertaken during the experimental period; and — The proposed duration of the experimental period.” Determination of Capacity Section 2.3 Stage 2 Documents “Documentation of the extent, nature and anticipated population of the area to be serviced, facilities proposed to serve the area and provisions for future expansion of the sewage works to include additional service areas and/or population growth; Itemization and discussion of present and future domestic sewage production figures, industrial, commercial and institutional sewage production, infiltration and wet weather inflows used in sizing various components of the sewage collection and/or treatment works.” 2.4.1.2 Design Brief – Major Facilities “[…] Basic data on the estimated sewage generation rates from the population and area to be served, including: — Design period;
WSP June 2019 Page A-12
Page 162 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
— Design service population and area and population density; — Design industrial, commercial and institutional sewage flows; — Wet weather flow; and — Design flows (average, peak daily and peak hourly).”
MECP GUIDELINE D-5-2 APPLICATION OF MUNICIPAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMUNAL WATER AND SEWAGE SERVICES, MARCH 1995 This brief Guideline institutes the requirement for a Municipal Responsibility Agreement (MRA). It applies to all works that require an ECA. It is the Ministry’s opinion that private communal systems are more likely to fail, due to poor management practices and insufficient funds for needed repairs. It therefore requires that for all privately-owned communal systems, municipalities take on the responsibility for repairing systems that fail, through an MRA with the developer. It requires municipalities to ensure that communal water and wastewater facilities are maintained in serviceable condition, such that the units relying upon decentralized services are safe to inhabit and operate at all times. In situations where communal water or wastewater facilities become inoperable or otherwise unsafe, the local municipality is obliged to intervene and fund repairs or replacements (“repairs”), up to and including full system replacement, as required to return the services to safe operation. This guideline is a considerable source of risk for municipalities.
WATER MANAGEMENT: POLICIES, GUIDELINES, PROVINCIAL WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES GUIDELINES, 1994 Effluent quality in Ontario is not governed primarily by absolute standards, but with regard to the specific assimilative capacity of the local watershed. The effluent itself must meet certain basic standards imposed by the MECP,44 and by the Federal Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations.45 However, higher standards are imposed on a context-specific basis, with reference to the local receiving waterbody and the Provincial Water Quality Objectives. Using monitoring data, often from Conservation Authorities, Ministry staff from the Regional Office will be able to determine what standards the effluent must meet in order to not bring water quality in the receiving body below the Provincial Water Quality Objectives, published in Table 2 of the Guideline:
44 45
ECO, Redefining Conservation. Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, (SOR/2012-139), Fisheries Act.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 163 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page A-13
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Provincial Water Quality Objectives (2.0) “are intended to provide guidance in making water quality management decisions such as the designation of the surface waters of the Province which should not be further degraded. They are often used as the starting point in deriving waste effluent requirements included in Certificates of Approval and other instruments issued to regulate effluent discharges.”
WSP June 2019 Page A-14
Page 164 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
B
COUNTY AND TOWNSHIPS PLANNING CONTEXT
Page 165 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 166 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
B.1 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC, OFFICIAL PLAN, JANUARY 2016 The Official Plan for the County of Frontenac (“County OP”) was adopted by Council on Wednesday October 29, 2014 and was approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs on January 11, 2016. The County OP provides over-arching policy direction on matters of provincial and County-wide significance. The OP directs growth management and land use decisions by providing upper-tier land use planning guidance for the County’s member municipalities. Detailed land use planning and local decision making is managed and administered locally through the local municipal Official Plans. Section 3 Growth Management contains policies related to growth patterns that would be shaped by a water and wastewater servicing strategy. Relevant subsections are excerpted here: Section 3 (c): “The lack of full municipal water and wastewater services in any of the hamlets or villages of the County will constrain the ability to increase the density of these areas, and may impact the ability to focus new development within these settlement areas;” Section 3 (f): “Settlement areas are identified in the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), 2014 as villages and hamlets where development is concentrated and which have a mix of land uses. It is recognized that some of the historical settlement areas identified on Schedule ‘A’ of this Plan may not meet this definition and are better described as crossroad. As a result, the County will undertake a settlement area study to examine and rationalize settlement areas identified on Schedule ‘A’ in order to determine where growth shall be focused over the long term planning horizon.” Section 3.2.2 Settlement Area Policies: “Efficient development patterns and road connections will be encouraged in Settlement Areas to optimize public services and to make the most efficient use of land and resources.” Section 3.2.2.2: “Because none of the settlement areas in the Frontenacs have municipal services, a settlement area capability study (comprehensive review) is required by the Official Plan for any boundary expansion to determine: (a) That the Settlement Area can adequately accommodate new development without having a negative impact on groundwater used for drinking purposes and/or the ability of the soils in the area to assimilate effluent; (b) An analysis of alternatives that may be considered to settlement expansion, including redevelopment and infill; and
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 167 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-1
AGENDA ITEM #b)
(c) A review to determine compliance with the Minimum Distance Separation (MDS) formulae.” In terms of long-range planning for municipal services, as stated, provisions of municipal infrastructure such as roads, street lighting, and municipal water is necessary to support long term viability of the communities located in the County. Moreover, the County recognizes the importance of providing municipal infrastructure in a timely fashion and that the maintenance and sustainability of existing infrastructure assets is fundamental to the continued variety and growth of settlement areas across the County. The following sections outline the County’s policy: Section 3.3 Rural Lands: “Low density residential development […] is desirable, provided it is appropriately located. […] Permitted uses are: […] Residential development of a limited scale.” Section 3.3.3 Policies: (1) “In recognition of the potential impacts that new growth and development may have on entire watershed systems, the County encourages communication between the local Townships within the same watershed area when a new development proposal is considered to have a potential impact on the quality and function of the watershed. (2) a. Lot creation should take place either through Plan of Subdivision, Plan of Condominium, or Consent. (2) d. It is recognized that the majority of existing and new rural residential development will be serviced by private wells and septic tanks; however, the County and the Townships may be interested in the investigation of new technologies and communal servicing options where it is deemed feasible for such areas and is supported by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC). (2) e. In determining the location and suitability of any proposed residential plan of subdivision, the following criteria shall be considered by both the County and the Townships: i. the design of the subdivision should provide for a range of lot sizes directly related to the site’s topography, vegetation and soil and drainage characteristics; ii. based on the varying topography across the County, the Local Official Plans should establish a base minimum lot size; iii. the minimum area of lot sizes should be determined by a hydrogeological study and a terrain analysis; iv. Lots need to be of adequate size to provide for proper installation of private services; […]”
WSP June 2019 Page B-2
Page 168 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
4.2 Servicing: 4.2.1.2 Goal: “To ensure that there is adequate provision of services and utilities consistent with the environmental, cultural, and economic goals of the County.” 4.2.1.3 Objectives “To encourage the provision of adequate municipal services to achieve and facilitate orderly growth. To improve the natural environment and maintain a clean and healthy level of water quality based on a watershed approach. To ensure that citizens of Frontenac County have access to potable drinking water. To promote waste reduction and waste management as per Section 4.3. […] To accommodate growth in an organized manner to minimize capital and operating costs for the Townships.” Section 4.2.1.4 Policies: “All new development within Settlement Areas will be provided with appropriate services to sustain permanent occupancy. The County supports and can work with the Townships to coordinate infrastructure and public service facilities such as potential municipal water and sewage, and will ensure that such facilities are strategically located to support effective and efficient delivery of services across Township boundaries.” Further, the County acknowledges new technologies and “Both the County and the Townships will monitor new technologies – in areas such as broadband, water treatment, and septic systems – that would be beneficial to residents and businesses and which would best be coordinated across municipal boundaries and will work together to develop strategies to ensure that optimal services can be provided in a timely and efficient manner.” The following sections outline the County’s policy: Section 4.2.1.4.1 Special Policies: Future Village Services Planning “With the exception of the village of Sydenham, not one of the villages and hamlets in Frontenac County has a municipal water supply. Villages such as Sharbot Lake, Marysville, Verona, Plevna and Harrowsmith are historical settlements that date back to the mid-nineteenth century in development. Many of the building lots in the village cores are too small relative to today’s health and safety standards with regard to the minimum lot size of approximately 1 hectares (2 acres) to ensure a long term potable water supply on private well and septic systems. […] To help ensure these villages can sustain commercial and residential use and remain a valuable part of sustaining rural living, the County supports long-term planning for potential municipal services in villages. The planning shall include the following: — Facilitate the preparation, implementation and monitoring of the Source Water Protection Plans; COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 169 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
— Work with the Townships to investigate and analyze lands adjacent to a village that could be purchased by the County or the Townships for the future site of a municipal well; and further, if necessary, work with the Townships to apply land use controls to surrounding properties to ensure long-term protection of the water source. — Prepare a region-wide review of villages and hamlets which could require municipal services in the future and develop a priority list for local government investment. — Establishment of a County reserve fund for drinking water protection that can be used in the investment of municipal infrastructure for water systems when required. — Work with provincial and federal governments to seek funding to invest in municipal services. — Partial services shall only be permitted in the following circumstances: — Where they are necessary to address failed individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services in existing development; or — Within settlement areas, to allow for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development on partial services provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts.” 4.2.1.5 Private Services: “Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services are not provided, individual on-site sewage services sand individual on-site water services may be used provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. In settlement areas, these services may only be used for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development. Negative Impacts shall be defined for the purposes of this section and Section 4.2.1.5 as degradation to the quality and quantity of water, sensitive surface water features and sensitive groundwater features, and their related hydrologic functions, due to single, multiple or successive development. Negative Impacts should be assessed through environmental studies including hydrogeological or water quality impact assessments, in accordance with provincial standards.” Policies in Section 4.2 Servicing, Subsection 4.2.2 Storm Water Management Planning, address stormwater management planning, which states that stormwater management plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Guideline, Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, 2003. Housing affordability, addressed in Section 5.2.2 Affordable Housing Policies is also indirectly impacted by servicing. This policy is cited below: “The local Townships will, where appropriate, promote intensification in settlement areas through their planning documents. Examples include: allowing for the conversion of single detached houses into multiple units and permitting land severances on large WSP June 2019 Page B-4
Page 170 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
underutilized properties which will allow for new residential development on the vacant severed parcel.” Section 7.2.1 Source Water Protection is relevant to the provision of communal water and wastewater servicing, as water intake zones must be planned for and protected. Section 7.2.1 Source Water Protection Plans: “The County shall […] Prohibit the establishment of new […] wastewater treatment plants in the Sydenham intake protection zones 1 and 2 (As identified in the Cataraqui Source Protection Plan) [and] Contribute and promote a culture of conservation among all public, private, community groups and local citizens and aim to reduce water use in all sectors; [and] Establish sector-specific targets for water use reductions”.
B.2 TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, 2017 The Township of North Frontenac Official Plan addresses water supply and sewage disposal in Section 3.17 Provisions for water supply and sewage disposal, which states: “Notwithstanding the servicing hierarchy in the PPS, “is the intent of Council, in having regard for this statement, to balance the servicing needs of the area with the character of development. Servicing will be on the basis of individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services. This reflects the character of the area as well as the intent to avoid densities, which may necessitate the installation of piped services. This may not preclude the need for private communal sewage and water services for larger scale permanent residential (condominium or tenured ownership), developments, commercial developments such as recreational vehicle park, tourist commercial operation etc.” Communal services are specifically addressed in Subsection 3.17.3 Communal Services, as described below: “Council may consider private sewage and private water communal services for multiple lot/unit development (more than five lots/units). Prior to considering the need for a communal service, Council shall be satisfied that the following criteria are considered: (a) That the proposed density of the development is essential to the viability of the project and that other development or servicing options have been thoroughly considered (i.e. different location, method of servicing, acquisition of a larger land holding, etc.), and that as a result, the only reasonable or economical alternative is a communal service.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 171 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
(b) That the potential for remedial measures has been adequately investigated with respect to health related matters (i.e. well contamination, nutrient management), and that no reasonable or economical alternative exists for resolving such health concerns that to install a communal service. (c) That the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change has issued an order under the “Ontario Water Resources Act” requiring the installation of a communal system and/or the proposed communal service qualifies for Certificate of Approval from the Ministry. (d) That the proposed owner/operator has prepared an appropriate business plan to establish an appropriate cost structure for the installation and operation of the communal services. (e) That the financial security can be established (e.g. trust fund and/or insurance policy), to offset potential capital or operational costs arising from the default of the operator. (f) Where such a service is deemed to be necessary based on the above criteria and is approved, Council will assume ownership and operation after the issuance of a Environmental Compliance Approval where a private communal sewage service and or a private communal water service are required for permanent freehold residential development. Where a private communal sewage service(s) is required for permanent residential development, the Municipality shall be responsible for the service(s) should the system fail or the maintenance be neglected. Where a private communal service is required a responsibility agreement shall be required between the Municipality and the proponent or developer. A responsibility agreement will not be required for a mobile home park or recreational vehicle park for non-permanent residential development. (Note: a private communal water service may include a Permit to Take Water under the Ontario Water Resources Act.) The responsibility agreement shall set out the requirements for the operation and maintenance of the system on a private basis subject to the approval of the Ministry of Environment. The legal agreement shall contain financial assurance provisions which will ensure funds for operation and routine maintenance as well as a secured fund for capital improvements should repair or replacement of the facility become necessary. In addition, the legal agreement shall set out the following: i.
Operating and Maintenance Standards.
ii.
A definition of Default.
iii.
An outline of remedial action.
iv.
Registration on title of the subject property.
v.
Easements, where required.
WSP June 2019 Page B-6
Page 172 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Council will assume ownership/operation for the private communal sewage and/or water service should the system fail or should the operator fail to operate or maintain the system according to the agreement and will utilize the financial security as needs to be in the operation/repair of the communal sewage service(s). For the purposes of this Plan, private communal services means a sewage works within the meaning of Section 1 of the Ontario Water Resources Act that serves six or more lots or private residences and is not owned by a Municipality. Private communal water services means a non-municipal drinking water system within the meaning of Section 2 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 that serves six or more lots of private residences. It is recognized that Frontenac County will be preparing a regional communal servicing study in 2017 that may result in Amendments to this Plan.” Under Section 3.17.4, it is Council’s policy that storm water management shall be required as a preventative approach, rather than relying solely on end-of-pipe quality control, to protecting the quality and quantity of water resources. Section 3.18 Co-ordination of Services of the Official Plan states that Council intends to monitor population, employment and housing development having regard to trends across the County of Frontenac and their impact on growth management in North Frontenac. The following are broad growth management and land use principles addressed in Section 4: 4.2.3 Hamlet Principles: “G. Opportunities for intensification and redevelopment shall also be promoted where it can be accommodated in the Hamlets through existing building stock, infill, on existing lots of record and through the rehabilitation and redevelopment of brownfields. Consideration for such initiatives shall recognize the long-term sustainability of development on private water and sewage services or the serving option selected for a hamlet or part thereof. Council shall establish and implement targets for intensification and redevelopment recognizing local servicing limitations.” Section 4.3.2 Rural Planning Principles “A. […] Lot sizes for rural residential development or waterfront residential development shall be no less than 0.8 ha (2 acres). In determining whether there is a suitable building envelope, all required yard setbacks, steep slopes, rocks bluffs, wetlands, etc. must be subtracted from the overall lot size (see Section 3.15.2 D). Lot sizes may be reduced in developments created by Plan of Subdivision or for multiple unit projects (fractional ownership, condominium, and time share).
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 173 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-7
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Lot sizes or density may only be reduced where the risk assessment arising out of the study clearly indicates that there will be no reduction in water quality in a ground or surface water supply, that the quantity is sustainable for the intended use without the drawdown or well interference with adjacent wells and that other design standards criteria are generally exceeded. The study shall be undertaken by a professional (team) competent in the field of hydrology, hydrogeology and ecology subject to terms of reference approved by the Municipality. The study shall be subject to a peer review at the cost of the applicant for development. The study shall also recommend measures to restore or improve sensitive surface water features, sensitive groundwater features and their hydrologic functions.” B. Residential development shall be adequately serviced with on-site water and sewage disposal services (see Section 3.18 – Water Supply and Sewage Disposal). Council will require a servicing options report as a means to determine the most appropriate option for servicing for large-scale development such as a Plan of Subdivision or for multiple unit projects (fractional ownership, condominium, time share). D. Energy efficient and sustainable design will be promoted for all development. Council may establish performance standards through conditional zoning, site plan control and other means.” 4.7 Tourist Commercial Uses 4.7.2 Planning Principles: “C. All tourist commercial uses requiring servicing shall be located on a lot that can be adequately serviced with water supply and sewage disposal (see Section 3.17 - Water Supply and Sewage Disposal).” 4.10 Waterfront Area 4.10.3 Basis and Principles: “C. Development should be promoted in locations where demands on public services will be minimized, and where this development will most effectively utilize – or help pay for – existing services.” 4.10.5 Objectives “G. To ensure that development does not unduly contribute to a demand for utilities or services which are uneconomical to provide, improve, or maintain.” 4.18 Energy, Air Quality and Sustainability 4.18.2 Planning Principles “D. Energy efficient and sustainable design will be promoted for all development. Council may establish performance standards through conditional zoning, site plan control and other means; and […]” WSP June 2019 Page B-8
Page 174 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.9.7. Holding Zone – Section 36 “In order to show a future zoning designation while retaining control of the timing of development, a “holding” designation may be used, in the form of a symbol “H” as a suffix to the zone designation. As long as the “H" is retained, the use of the land shall be limited. A. Rationale for the Use of Holding by-laws Holding by-laws may be used where the principle of development has been established under the Planning Act. A Holding By-law may be used under the following circumstances: i. To hold development until water and sewage services are provided, or, studies have been undertaken to prove that servicing is possible on the site and the servicing has been included in the Municipal budget or provided for through a Subdivision Agreement or other acceptable means with a developer; […]”. B. Conditions to be met for Removal of the Holding Symbol The Holding “H” may be removed by by-law when the above circumstances have been satisfied and the following conditions met: (i) Approval of servicing the site /area is given or servicing of adequate standards is provided on the site[.]” The possibility to impose parkland dedication requirements for Plans of Subdivision or Condominium is set out in Section 3.15.2. Section 3.15.2 Consents “S. Conditions may be imposed by Council in the granting of severances, which may include but not be limited to the following: […] (iii) The dedication of land or cash-in-lieu of parkland; […]” Overall parkland dedication requirements are set out in Section 6.9.11. 6.9.11. Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-Lieu – Section 42 “It is Council’s policy to require the conveyance of parkland or the cash-in-lieu equivalent for residential and non-residential development as a means to implementing the policies for parks and open space areas of this Plan. The land or cash to be conveyed shall not exceed two per cent (2 %) of the value of the land to be developed for commercial or industrial uses or five per cent (5 %) for residential uses. Where Council requests cashin-lieu, the value of the land shall be determined on the day before the day the building permit is issued.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 175 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-9
AGENDA ITEM #b)
B.3
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, 2008 (CURRENTLY IN FORCE)
Water supply and sewage disposal provisions are outlined in Section 4.2. It is the intent of Council to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement’s provision, which identifies a servicing hierarchy where full municipal servicing needs of the area with the character of development. Traditionally low densities in the village of Sharbot Lake, hamlets and cross road settlements have not necessitated full municipal services. The intent of the Plan is to conserve this character by requiring larger lot sizes which will not require costly services. Further, Section 3.5 provides provisions for village, hamlet and cross road settlement area development concept. It states that none of the communities categorized are serviced or intended to be serviced with piped municipal services or communal services. Consequently, lot sizes for all new development must be adequate to support on-site water and sewage disposal systems. Policy overview under Section 4.2.1 states that, in the Rural Area, low density development will continue to prevail and on-site (private) services will continue to be the basis for servicing. The exception will be larger scale commercial developments, such as recreational vehicle park or campground, where communal services may be required. Section 4.2.2 explicitly states that it is the policy of Council to ensure that the density of development within the Planning Area does not result in the need for piped water and sewer services and in the review of planning applications, it is Council’s intent to ensure that lot sizes are sufficiently large to make them self-sustaining for the purposes of water supply and the disposal of sewage. Individual on-site sewage disposal systems are permitted under Section 4.2.3, subject to the outlined approval requirements. Council may consider communal services, as per Section 4.2.4, for multiple lot development (six or more lot/units). For the purposes of this plan, communal services means sewage works and sewage systems and water works that provide for the distribution, collection or treatment of sewage or water, but which are not connected to full municipal sewage and water services; are for the common use of six or more residential or non-residential lots or units; and are owned, operated, and managed by the municipality, another public body, a condominium corporation or single owner under an agreement pursuant to the Planning Act. If a system is approved, Council will assume responsibility or ownership after the issuance of a Certificate of Approval. Moreover, Council may choose to operate the system or consider entering into a legal agreement for the operation and maintenance of the system on a private
WSP June 2019 Page B-10
Page 176 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
basis subject to the approval of the Ministry of Environment. Should the system fail or operator fail to operate or maintain the system in accordance with the agreement, Council will assume responsibility for the communal system. Under Section 4.3, “Storm Water Management and Drainage”, it states that it is Council’s policy that storm water management shall be required for all urban settlement areas as a preventative measure (rather than relying solely on end-of-pipe quality control) to protecting water resources (quality and quantity) and outside of urban settlement areas where deemed appropriate. This section also features principles which Council intends to utilize in its approach to storm water management. Parkland Dedications are addressed under the following policies: 3.5.1 Residential District 3. Public Service Uses “D. Council may elect to utilize the Planning Act to require the dedication of park land or the cash-in-lieu equivalent as a means to providing additional parkland or improving recreational facilities within existing parks […].” Constraints on what parkland can by accepted by the Township are set out in Section 8.1.1 Policies – Flood Plains: “7. Where new development is proposed on a site, part of which has physical or environmental constraints, such land shall not necessarily be acceptable for parkland dedication under Section 43 of the Planning Act. All lands conveyed to the municipality shall be in a physical condition satisfactory to Council.” The Parkland Dedication requirements are contained in Section 10.11.11 Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-Lieu – Section 42: “It is Council’s policy to require the conveyance of parkland or the cash-in-lieu equivalent for residential and non-residential development as a means to implementing the policies for parks and open space areas of this Plan. The land or cash to be conveyed shall not exceed two per cent (2 %) of the value of the land to be developed for commercial or industrial uses or five per cent (5 %) for residential uses. Where Council requests cashin-lieu, the value of the land shall be determined on the day before the day the building permit is issued.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 177 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-11
AGENDA ITEM #b)
B.4
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, (DRAFT, MAY 2018)
Section 2.2 Vision and Context establishes five areas of focus, including: •
Infrastructure
•
Protection and Health of Natural Environment
The Official Plan also recognizes the impacts of climate change on land-use, particularly unpredictable water levels in rivers, lakes and groundwater during droughts and floods. General objectives are outlined in Section 2.3 Objectives of the Plan. Subsections applicable to the Study are as follows: Section 2.3.2 “To promote efficient development patterns that optimize the use of land, resources and public investment, and to promote a strong liveable and healthy community that enhances social well-being and is economically and environmentally sound. […]” Section 2.3.5 “To provide for a low-density settlement pattern which can be efficiently serviced, but which will avoid densities that will require the need for piped municipal services. Development will be encouraged in locations where services (e.g., snow plowing, school bussing, fire protection, ambulance service and waste disposal) are available or can be made available at a reasonable cost.” Section 2.3.17. “To encourage sustainable practices in the planning, design and development of the community through such measures as reducing energy consumption; improve or restore ecological functions; conserving or promoting biodiversity; recycling, harvesting and conserving water resources including waste water; […] promoting the use of environmentally friendly building materials and building systems; conducting energy and lifecycle audits; and promoting adaptive technologies that reduce consumptive practices.” This section also makes reference to protecting the financial status of the Township with regard to infrastructure planning. Section 3.17 Water Supply and Sewage Disposal addresses the servicing hierarchy in the PPS. However, the Plan states that: “Servicing will be on the basis of individual on-site sewage services and individual onsite water services.”
WSP June 2019 Page B-12
Page 178 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Nevertheless, provisions for private communal water and sewage services are made for residential developments with 5 or more lots, and for commercial developments like RV parks and tourist operations. This is addressed in Section 3.17.3: “Prior to considering the need for a communal service Council shall be satisfied that the following criteria are considered: A. That the proposed density of development is essential to the viability of the project and that other development or servicing options have been thoroughly considered (i.e. different location, method of servicing, acquisition of a larger land holding etc.), and that as a result, the only reasonable or economical alternative is a communal service. B. That the potential for remedial measures has been adequately investigated with respect to health related matters (i.e. well contamination, nutrient management, and that no reasonable or economical alternative exits for resolving such health concerns than to install a communal service. C. That the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change has issued an order under the “Ontario Water Resources Act” requiring the installation of a communal system and/or the proposed communal service qualifies for Certificate of Approval from the Ministry. D. That the proposed owner/operator has prepared an appropriate business plan to establish an appropriate cost structure for the installation and operation of the communal services(s). E. That a financial security can be established (e.g. trust fund and/or insurance policy), to offset potential capital or operational costs arising from the default of the operator. F. Where such a service is deemed to be necessary based on the above criteria and is approved, Council will assume ownership and operation after the issuance of a Environmental Compliance Approval where a private communal sewage service and or a private communal water service are required for permanent freehold residential development. Where a private communal sewage service(s) is required for permanent residential development, the Municipality shall be responsible for the service(s) should the system fail or the maintenance be neglected. Where a private communal service is required a responsibility agreement shall be required between the Municipality and the proponent or developer. A responsibility agreement will not be required for a mobile home park or recreational vehicle park for non-permanent residential development. (Note: a private communal water service may include a Permit to Take Water under the Ontario Water Resources Act.) The responsibility agreement shall set out the
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 179 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-13
AGENDA ITEM #b)
requirements for the operation and maintenance of the system on a private basis subject to the approval of the Ministry of Environment. The legal agreement shall contain financial assurance provisions which will ensure funds for operation and routine maintenance as well as a secured fund for capital improvements should repair or replacement of the facility become necessary. In addition, the legal agreement shall set out the following: i.
Operating and Maintenance Standards.
ii.
A definition of Default.
iii.
An outline of remedial action.
iv.
Registration on title of the subject property.
v.
Easements, where required.
Council will assume ownership/operation for the private communal sewage and/or water service should the system fail or should the operator fail to operate or maintain the system according to the agreement and will utilize the financial security as needs to be in the operation/repair of the communal sewage service(s). For the purposes of this Plan, private communal services means a sewage works within the meaning of Section 1 of the Ontario Water Resources Act that serves six or more lots or private residences and is not owned by a Municipality. Private communal water services means a non-municipal drinking water system within the meaning of Section 2 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 that serves six or more lots of private residences. G. It is recognized that Frontenac County will be preparing a regional communal servicing study in 2018 that may result in Amendments to this Plan.” Beyond the direct discussion of communal servicing in Section 3.17.3, the Plan’s treatment of land use has relevance for questions of communal servicing. Hamlet Settlement Area policies, addressed in Section 4.1 Hamlet Settlement Areas are intended to encourage residential development, considering the limitations posed by on-site water and sewer service. Section 4.1.3 Hamlet Planning Principles B. “Ensuring that the lot can be adequately serviced with water supply and sewage disposal.” H. “Council will encourage development to occur on existing approved lots before considering new development. Opportunities for intensification and redevelopment shall also be promoted where it can be accommodated in the Hamlets through existing building stock, infill, on existing lots of record and through the rehabilitation and redevelopment of brownfields. Consideration for such initiatives shall recognize the longWSP June 2019 Page B-14
Page 180 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
term sustainability of development on private water and sewage services or the serving option selected for a hamlet or part thereof. Council shall establish and implement targets for intensification and redevelopment recognizing local servicing limitations.” Preferred servicing is outlined in Section 4.2.1: 4.2.1 Rural Area General “New development will be on the basis of on-site (private) water and sewage disposal systems, or communal systems, where necessary.” Rural lot development must occur on lots greater than 0.8 ha, not including natural heritage features and yard setbacks. However, under Section 4.3.2 Planning Principles: A. […] “Lot sizes may be reduced in developments created by Plan of Subdivision or for multiple unit projects (fractional ownership, condominium, and time share).[…]” B. “Residential development shall be adequately serviced with on-site water and sewage disposal services (see Section 3.18 – Water Supply and Sewage Disposal). Council may require a servicing options report as a means to determine the most appropriate option for servicing for large-scale development such as a Plan of Subdivision or for multiple unit projects (fractional ownership, condominium, time share).” Rural Recreational Uses are also permitted where designated. As per Section 4.5.2 “Planning Principles”: F. “All rural recreational uses requiring servicing shall be located on a lot that can be adequately serviced with water supply and sewage disposal.” This requirement is repeated verbatim in Section 4.6 Tourist Commercial Uses, subsection 4.6.2 B. of the Draft OP. Policy outlining the servicing requirements for Recreational Commercial Vehicle parks incorporates greater flexibility, as per Section 4.7.3 Recreational Vehicle Parks and Campgrounds: “Where a number of new recreational vehicles are permitted, such as in a designated Recreational Vehicle Park and the aggregate sewage effluent discharge is greater than 10,000 liters per day, the approval of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall be required as set out in the Ontario Water Resources Act. Communal services shall be the preferred means of servicing multiple units. (see also Section 3.17 – Water Supply and Sewage Disposal). This policy shall not be deemed to exempt any
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 181 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-15
AGENDA ITEM #b)
existing recreational vehicles from compliance with the Building Code Act or Ontario Water Resources Act, respectively, where a compliance order is issued.” Additionally, Section 4.7.6 Development Criteria for Recreational Parks and Campground, subsection G indicates what factors should be included in capacity calculations: “The proposed water supply and sewage disposal systems shall comply with Section 3.17 – Water Supply and Sewage Disposal of the Plan. Water usage and sewage disposal shall take into consideration provisions for shower, rest room and laundry facilities[.]” Section 4.8 as a whole addresses Waterfront Areas. This section intends to address the conservation of water quality and ecosystem health (by regulating land use in areas within 150 metres of the waterfront, subject to a number of qualifications. Generally, the goals and objectives aim to achieve this by limiting waterfront development densities and ensuring that development is compatible with the natural surroundings. Specific reference to communal servicing is made in the discussion of Special Policy Area 1 – Garrison Shores under Section 4.9.5: D. Sewage and Water Services “The intent of this Plan is to provide for the progressive improvement of sewage and water services for existing development and to ensure that no new development is permitted unless it is clearly demonstrated that the site conditions for sewage and water services are suitable for the long-term provision of such services. Sewage and water systems may include individual on-site services or private communal sewage and water service systems or a mix of both types of systems. Prior to the approval of any of the following development or redevelopment applications, the procedures set out in Guidelines D-5-4 and D-5-5 of the Ministry of the Environment shall be satisfied in terms of water supply and impact assessment. A planning application shall be supported by a report that addresses the requirements of the Guidelines. In addition, Council may use the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act or any other applicable legislation to ensure that malfunctioning sewage disposal systems are rectified and that water wells are properly maintained. Planning applications requiring an assessment include: — An application to develop a vacant unit or parcel for a residential dwelling or recreational vehicle; — An application to expand an existing recreational/residential use that creates the demand for water or sewage disposal (i.e. adding a bedroom); — An application to convert a seasonal dwelling to a permanent year-round dwelling; and
WSP June 2019 Page B-16
Page 182 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
— An application to install a new water and/or sewage disposal system even if there is no change to the principal use; — An application to change an existing use from a recreational vehicle to a residential dwelling. The assessment of sewage and water services shall apply to a specific development cluster, except where in the opinion of a qualified professional, consideration has to be given to lands within an adjacent development cluster. Any subsequent applications shall take into consideration the findings and recommendations of a previous assessment. Sewage disposal systems and water wells may be located outside of a prescribed Recreational/Residential Unit where permitted by the Condominium declaration, provided the overall density of the Development Cluster for which the service is provided is not exceeded. In no case, will development or redevelopment be permitted which is not environmentally sustainable nor which exceeds the density standards for a development cluster. The performance of sewage disposal systems may be monitored by Council through a septic tank re-inspection program to ensure that systems are properly maintained. Council will require that property owners and/or the condominium corporation make provision with a licensed sewage hauler for the pump-out of septic tanks on a regular basis.” As per Section 4.9.6 Waterfront Protection Policy, waterfront areas are subject to Site Plan Control, which can apply to the siting of sewage disposal and water supply system components. The Draft Official Plan’s policies with regards to energy efficiency and sustainability also have applicability to the question of communal servicing. In particular, the Draft OP would commit to the following Planning Principles as listed in Section 4.15 Energy, Air Quality and Sustainability: Section 4.15.2 Planning Principles “[…] B. Council will encourage the installation of: energy efficient solid fuel burning appliances; proper, energy efficient insulation; water conserving fixtures, etc.; […] D. Energy efficient and sustainable design will be promoted for all development. Council may establish performance standards through conditional zoning, site plan control and other means.” Also of potential relevance to communal water and wastewater systems is the question of parkland dedications, under Section 42 of the Planning Act. The draft Plan allows the
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 183 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-17
AGENDA ITEM #b)
municipality to impose parkland dedication requirements for draft plans of subdivision or condominium, as cited in Section 3.15.2 Consents: “S. Conditions may be imposed by Council in the granting of severances, which may include but not be limited to the following: […] (iii) The dedication of land or cash-in-lieu of parkland; […]” In Section 6.9 Planning Act, the Official Plan describes what form this condition would take: Section 6.9.11 Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-Lieu – Section 42: “It is Council’s policy to require the conveyance of parkland or the cash-in-lieu equivalent for residential and non-residential development as a means to implementing the policies for parks and open space areas of this Plan. The land or cash to be conveyed shall not exceed two per cent (2 %) of the value of the land to be developed for commercial or industrial uses or five per cent (5 %) for residential uses. Where Council requests cashin-lieu, the value of the land shall be determined on the day before the day the building permit is issued.”
B.5 TOWNSHIP OF FRONTENAC ISLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN, CONSOLIDATED 2013 The goals and objectives of the Township, as specified in Section 2.2, states that, for infrastructure goals, full municipal sewage and water services are the preferred form of servicing for urban and settlement areas. Therefore, Council’s objective is to complete a study on the feasibility of installing a municipal water service for Marysville. In areas serviced by full municipal sewage and water services, lot creation will be permitted only if sufficient reserve water and sewage system capacity will be available to accommodate it. If full municipal services are unavailable or cannot be provided, communal services are the preferred means of servicing multiple lot/units provided site conditions are suitable. Lot/unit creation may be serviced by individual on-site sewage and water systems where the use of communal systems is not feasible. Moreover, partial services may be permitted where necessary to address failed on-site sewage and water systems in existing development. Section 3 details community structure and development policies. Water supply is outlined in Section 3.2.4 Water Supply. It states that the municipality does not currently operate any municipal water supplies and relies on individual water supplies taken from ground water sources or adjacent water bodies. Except for those areas where new communal water supplies can be established such as within the urban settlement area of Marysville, it is expected that new development in these areas will continue to rely on ground water and surface sources.
WSP June 2019 Page B-18
Page 184 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Communal water supply is further outlined in Policy 3.2.4.1 Communal Water Supply, which indicates that new residential development of 6 residential units or more will be served by communal water supply systems except where it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Township that a communal system is not feasible or practical. In terms of administration and management, all new communal water supply systems designed to serve more than 5 residential lots/units shall be assumed by the municipality for administration and maintenance purposes and an annual review of all municipal water supply systems shall be required. Section 3.2.4.2 Private Communal Piped Water Supply permits the continuation of existing private supply. New private communal services will be subject to municipal review where planning and building approvals are required. For individual water supplies, such as wells, the applicant should be required to prove the adequacy of the available water supply to provide a dependable, safe source of water over extended periods without negatively impacting on other water sources for adjacent uses, as indicated in Policy 3.2.4.3 Individual Water Supply. Policies for sewage disposal are outlined in Section 3.2.5 Sewage Disposal, which states there are no municipal sewage collection or disposal systems in the Township. Instead, development is served by individual sewage disposal systems, which consist primarily of septic tanks and tile fields. New development will continue to rely on either communal or individual sewage disposal systems. The Official Plan may designate those areas where new development will only be permitted on the basis of a communal sewage disposal system as per Section 3.2.5.1 Public Sewage Disposal Systems. No areas have been designated at this time. For private communal sewage disposal, as per Section 3.2.5.2 Private Communal Sewage Disposal, where a private communal sewage disposal system exists, it may continue to provide service to the existing uses it has been serving. New communal services will be subject to municipal review where planning and building approvals are required. Subject to the Ministry of the Environment review, an existing system may be extended as a private communal system. New private communal systems shall be subject to review in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment legislation and guidelines. Parkland dedication requirements are set out in Section 3.5.1 General Policies. The specific provisions of the OP are as follows: “1. It is intended that the provisions of Sections 42, 51, and 53 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, shall apply to all new plans of subdivision and consents to land severance, development or redevelopment. In accordance with these provisions, land and/or cash-in-lieu thereof shall be conveyed to the municipality as a condition to approval of the Plan of Subdivision, consent to land severance, development or redevelopment.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 185 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page B-19
AGENDA ITEM #b)
- It is intended that lands conveyed to the municipality in accordance with the above provisions shall be suitable for development as a public recreational area and that lands subject to physical limitations such as flooding, steep slopes, erosion or other similar limitations will not necessarily be accepted for park purposes. All lands dedicated to the municipality shall be conveyed in a physical condition satisfactory to the municipality and the municipality may require certain improvements such as grading, planting of grass seed and other vegetation, fencing, etc.”
WSP June 2019 Page B-20
Page 186 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
C
DRAFT OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES
Page 187 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 188 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
This Appendix includes draft policy recommendations to be considered by the County and the Townships to implement the findings of this Study in the policies of the respective County and Township Official Plans.
C.1 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, ADOPTED OCTOBER 15, 2014, MMAH APPROVAL JANUARY 11, 2016 1.
Page 9, Section 1 – Introduction, Context of the Plan, add a new paragraph to read: “Moving forward, the County intends to become a leader in the use of communal servicing to encourage growth and development in these villages to promote historic revitalization, mainstreet development, and community building.”
Page 24, Section 3.1 – Growth Projections for Frontenac County, delete (c) and replace with: “Development opportunities on communal servicing shall be encouraged to direct growth and redevelopment in Settlement Areas.”
Page 24, Section 3.2 – Settlement Areas, Section 3.2.1 – Introduction, add to the end of the existing paragraph: “Over time, Settlement Areas may change and new ones may be created. The County shall encourage development on communal services in Settlement Areas to allow growth and revitalization to these areas and mainstreets.”
Page 25, Section 3.2 – Settlement Areas, Section 3.2.1 – Introduction, add the following text to the end of the second paragraph: “…the County supports new development in both the settlement areas as well as in rural locations, and encourages such development to occur on communal services as per Section 4.2.1.6 of the Plan.” (recommended text in bold)
Page 28, Section 3.3.3 Policies (in Rural Lands Section), delete Policy 2 (d) and replace with: “The County and the Townships shall encourage communal servicing as an alternative to private wells and septic tanks, where it is deemed feasible, and is supported by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP).”
Page 31, Section 3.3.3.4.4 Policies (in the Special Policies – Waterfront Areas Section), the following policy should be added: “In order to reduce environmental impacts on a waterbody, Council supports the use of communal services for new development or redevelopment adjacent to a waterfront.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 189 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page C-1
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 42, Section 4.2.1.4.1 Special Policies: Future Village Services Planning (in the Servicing Section), the following policy should be added: “Development on communal services, as per Section 4.2.1.6, shall be encouraged within these villages. The priority shall be for residential development on communal servicing to be implemented through plans of subdivision.
Page 42, Section 4.2.1.4.1 Special Policies: Future Village Services Planning (in the Servicing Section), the following policy should be deleted: “Within settlement areas, to allow for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development on partial services provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts.”
Page 43, a new Section 4.2.1.6 Communal Services, including the following subsections and policies, should be added: “4.2.1.6.1 Introduction Communal services (also known as ‘decentralized services’) provide water and wastewater treatment to cluster of residences or businesses. They can be a less expensive alternative to centralized municipal services and a more environmentally-friendly alternative to private on-site services. The County completed a regional ‘Communal Servicing Study’ in 2019 to equip Frontenac with the planning, engineering, and economic development tools necessary to enable redevelopment and new development using communal services. 4.2.1.6.2 Policies The County supports the use of communal sewage and water services as a form of infrastructure that can support new development within settlement areas, waterfront development, redevelopment of main streets, improved environmental protection and protection of public health. County Council further supports communal services as a means to support the broad objectives of sustainability of this Plan and the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, including: •
intensification;
•
efficient land use;
•
rural affordability;
•
growth in Settlement Areas;
•
preservation of agricultural land;
•
increase active transportation; and
•
efficient use of infrastructure by allowing denser development in small settlement areas and creating a sense of place.
WSP June 2019 Page C-2
Page 190 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
All development within the County may be developed on the basis of communal systems, subject to the proponent fully satisfying all financial, technical, and other requirements of the County and/or the Townships, and other relevant approval authorities. Any such system will have to meet the requirements of this Plan, the Local Official Plans, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP), and the approval processes under the Environmental Assessment Act, the Ontario Water Resources Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and the Planning Act. The County and/or the Townships shall require a Municipal Responsibility Agreement to be established between the proponent and the County/Township. In approving any communal system, the County and/or Township may require a peer review of the proposed communal system, and shall require financial securities, and may impose a utility rate, to ensure that all operational, maintenance and administration costs associated with communal services will not create an unacceptable financial burden for the County and/or Townships, in the event of default by the owner-operator of the system. The County will work to develop a financial model to reduce the risk of entering into a Municipal Responsibility Agreement for the County and/or Townships, and to reduce the cost of such agreements to a proponent in order to enable communal service development. In order to ensure all future communal serviced development is meeting public health and safety standards, the County will consider the creation of a public utility that will: •
inspect and monitor communal systems and ensure that such test reporting is made public;
•
ensure that any maintenance requirements are addressed in a timely manner subject to municipal and provincial approvals; and
•
establish fees for the purpose of managing communal systems.
C.2 TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC: MAY 19, 2017, APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF FRONTENAC: SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 1.
Page 14, Section 2.3.19 – Economic Development, add the following policy: “The Township shall encourage growth and development in the Settlement Areas, including mainstreets, and rural development to occur on communal systems to revitalize the historic hamlets, while fostering rural affordability.”
Page 28, Section 3.15.1 – Plans of Subdivision and Condominium, add a new paragraph:
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 191 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page C-3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
“F: Communal Services: shall be encouraged for waterfront development that is accessed by private roads, and implemented through plans of condominium, which are subject to County approval.” 3.
Pages 38 to 40, Section 3.17.3 – Communal Services, the following changes and additions are recommended: —
In the first paragraph, delete “[…] (more than five lots/units)”.
—
Add a policy to state that, “Council shall balance the servicing needs and the fiscal reality of achieving rural affordability.”
—
Delete the second paragraph, and replace with: “Development on communal services shall be in keeping with the following policies:”
—
Delete policies A, B, C, E and replace with: A. “The Township Council shall encourage communal servicing as an alternative to private wells and septic tanks, where it is deemed feasible, and is supported by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP)”. B. “Development on communal services shall be encouraged within settlement areas. In settlement areas, the priority shall be for residential development on communal servicing shall be implemented through plans of subdivision.” C. “The Township shall require a Municipal Responsibility Agreement to be established between the proponent and the Township. In approving any communal system, the County and/or the Township may require a peer review of the proposed communal system, and shall require financial securities, and may impose a utility rate, to ensure that all operational, maintenance and administration costs associated with the private communal services will not create an unacceptable financial burden for the County and/or the Township, in the event of default by the owner-operator of the system.”
—
D. Delete “That the proposed owner/operator has prepared an appropriate business plan […]”, and replace with: “The proposed owner/operator shall be required to prepare an appropriate business plan […]”
—
F. Delete “Where such a service is deemed to be necessary based on the above criteria and is approved […]”, and replace with: “Where communal services are deemed to be necessary and are approved […]”
—
F. In the first paragraph, last sentence, delete “non-permanent residential development” and replace with “seasonal residential development.”
—
F. In the second last paragraph, delete references to “six or more lots.”
—
F. Delete the last paragraph: “It is recognized that Frontenac County will be preparing a regional communal servicing study in 2017 that may result in Amendments to this Plan.”
Page 40, the last paragraph in Policy F should be deleted.
WSP June 2019 Page C-4
Page 192 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 46, Section 4.1.3 – Hamlet Planning Principles, the following new policy should be added: L. “The Township shall encourage growth and development in the Settlement Areas, including mainstreets, to occur on communal systems to revitalize the historic hamlets and provide opportunities for increased density and a mix of uses.”
Page 78, Servicing, revise the policies as follows: —
Revise “T” to read, “Development in the Waterfront Area designation that is accessed by a private road shall be encouraged to be on communal services, where feasible, and implemented through a plan of condominium, subject to approval. Where such development cannot occur, development may be serviced by private individual on-site sewage and water systems.”
—
Delete “V” and replace with: “The Township supports and encourages new development on communal services in both the settlement areas as well as in rural locations.”
C.3 TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, WITH MODIFICATIONS JUNE 18, 2008 A preliminary review of the Official Plan was conducted, but since a Draft OP has been prepared, the focus on potential policy changes has been focused on the Draft OP. It is anticipated that a Revised Draft OP will be presented to Township Council in Spring 2019.
C.4 TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC OFFICIAL PLAN, FIRST DRAFT, MAY 15, 2018 1.
Page 14, Policy 2.3.5 under Section 2.3 – Objectives of the Plan: —
Move “Development will be encouraged in locations […]” since this is covered in Policy 2.3.16.
—
Add to Policy 2.3.5, “Development will be encouraged in locations where communal systems are feasible.”
Page 17, move last paragraph to Policy 2.3.19, “For example […] development will be encouraged where it takes advantage of alternative forms of servicing such as communal servicing and existing infrastructure […]”
Page 32, Section 3.15.1 – Plans of Subdivision and Condominium, add a new F: “Infrastructure: Development on communal services shall be considered for a plan of subdivision or plan of condominium.”
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 193 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page C-5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Pages 42 to 44, Section 3.17.3 – Communal Services, the following changes and additions are recommended: —
In the first paragraph, delete “[…] (more than five lots/units)”.
—
Add a policy to state that, “Council shall balance the servicing needs and the fiscal reality of achieving rural affordability.”
—
Delete the second paragraph, and replace with: “Development on communal services shall be in keeping with the following policies:”
—
Delete policies A, B, C, E and replace with: A. “The Township Council shall encourage communal servicing as an alternative to private wells and septic tanks, where it is deemed feasible, and is supported by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP)”. B. “Development on communal services shall be encouraged within settlement areas. In settlement areas, the priority shall be for residential development on communal servicing shall be implemented through plans of subdivision.” C. “The Township shall require a Municipal Responsibility Agreement to be established between the proponent and the Township. In approving any communal system, the County and/or the Township may require a peer review of the proposed communal system, and shall require financial securities, and may impose a utility rate, to ensure that all operational, maintenance and administration costs associated with the private communal services will not create an unacceptable financial burden for the County and/or the Township, in the event of default by the owner-operator of the system.”
—
D. Delete “That the proposed owner/operator has prepared an appropriate business plan […]”, and replace with: “The proposed owner/operator shall be required to prepare an appropriate business plan […]”
—
F. Delete “Where such a service is deemed to be necessary based on the above criteria and is approved […]”, and replace with: “Where communal services are deemed to be necessary and are approved […]”
—
F. In the first paragraph, last sentence, delete “non-permanent residential development” and replace with “seasonal residential development.”
—
F. In the last paragraph, delete references to “six or more lots.”
—
Delete policy G: “It is recognized that Frontenac County will be preparing a regional communal servicing study in 2018 that may result in Amendments to this Plan.”
Page 57, Section 4.1.3 – Hamlet Planning Principles, the following new policy should be added:
WSP June 2019 Page C-6
Page 194 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
M. “The Township shall encourage growth and development in the Settlement Areas, including mainstreets, to occur on communal systems to revitalize the historic hamlets and provide opportunities for increased density and a mix of uses.” 5.
Page 58, Section 4.1.4 – Special Policy Area – Sharbot Lake: The County is currently preparing a new section with special policies to recognize the village as a regional hub, the importance of the future design of Highway 7, and a potential new VIA Rail station. The section will also include special policies specific to communal servicing to provide a framework for future municipal capital investment.
Page 71, Section 4.7.3 – Recreational Vehicle Parks and Campgrounds – draft policy stating, “Communal services shall be the preferred means of servicing multiple units.” This policy should remain.
Page 136, Appendix 1 – Definitions. Consider adding a definition for “communal services” and consider clarification and revisions to other existing terms currently used in the draft OP for “municipal services”, “public services”, “infrastructure”.
C.5 TOWNSHIP OF FRONTENAC ISLANDS OFFICIAL PLAN, JULY 2013 CONSOLIDATED VERSION 1.
Page 12, Section 3.2: —
Move the following text from Section 3.2.1 “Background” to a new preamble: “The land use designations of Schedule “A” require differing levels of supporting services. These services are provided by a number of service providers, many on a communal basis.”
—
Delete Section 3.2.1 “Background” in its entirety, and renumber the subsequent Sections.
Page 14, Section 3.2.3 – Water Supply and Sewage Disposal, delete “more than 5 residential lots/units or other […]”.
Page 14, Section 3.2.4.1, subsection 1. New Public Systems, i – New Development, delete “of 6 residential units or more”.
Page 15, Section 3.2.4.1, subsection 1. New Public Systems, iv – Administration and Management, delete “designed to serve more than 5 residential lots/units” and delete “shall be assumed” and replace with “may be assumed”.
Page 17, Section 3.2.5.2 – Private Communal Sewage Disposal, first paragraph, “New communal services will be subject to municipal review and a peer review…” (recommended text in bold to be added)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 195 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page C-7
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 65, Section 5.5.1 – General Principles for Village Areas, last paragraph, policy to be added, “…commercial and community services on communal systems […]” (recommended text in bold to be added)
WSP June 2019 Page C-8
Page 196 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
D
ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES
Page 197 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 198 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
D.1 INTRODUCTION The following Engineering Best Practices provide a guideline for the planning, selection, and design of a communal on-site sewage treatment and disposal system. Best practices for installation, operation, and maintenance are also discussed. It should be noted that this is not intended to be an all-inclusive document and requires professional judgement in its use. For all sewage systems, appropriate government approvals will be required prior to construction and/or use of the system.
D.2 SITE EVALUATION D.2.1
EVALUATION OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Once the development site has been confirmed, a background review of site characteristics should be undertaken in order to plan for communal sewage servicing. Site characteristics may play a significant factor in the type of disposal (i.e. surface or subsurface), effluent requirements for the treatment system, and the type of treatment technology that will be chosen. The type of sewage system will also depend on other factors such as raw sewage quality and design sewage flows. Site characteristics that should be reviewed prior to choosing a method of communal sewage servicing should include, but are not limited to, the following: •
Site location
•
Surrounding land uses
•
Physiography of the site, including: o
Shallow soils
o
Topography
o
Bedrock topography and formations — The majority of the County of Frontenac is underlain by Precambrian metamorphic and igneous rock of the Canadian Shield. The southwest part of the County, including Wolfe Island and Howe Island, is underlain by Paleozoic sandstone, dolostone, limestone, and shale.46 The Precambrian Shield is prone to cracking and seepage.47
o
Hydrostratigraphy
o
Local water well locations
46 Ontario Geological Survey. 2012. Aggregate Resources Inventory of the County of Frontenac, Southern Ontario,
pg.15. 47 County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016, pg. 42. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 199 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-1
AGENDA ITEM #b)
o
Local surface water features
Information for the above items can be sourced from GIS mapping of the development site, the MECP’s Water Well Record database, and on-site investigations. Other sources may have to be consulted, depending on site conditions.
D.2.2
SOIL EVALUATION
Field investigations should be undertaken following the background review to confirm the site characteristics. For subsurface disposal, an intrusive on-site shallow hydrogeological investigation would be required. The investigation would include test pits or boreholes to be completed within the proposed tank and leaching bed area to determine the following: •
Depth to bedrock or primary restricting layer (bedrock, groundwater table, impermeable soil);
•
Evidence of high groundwater table;
•
Soil conditions that may influence the design of the sewage system, such as smearing, compaction, presence of fill, etc.); and
•
Infiltration rate of the soils.
Test pit or borehole logs should be completed according to standard practices. An adequate number of test pits should be excavated and analyzed to provide sufficient information to characterize the site. According to the Ontario Building Code (“OBC”) (2012), infiltration rates or percolation times that are used in the design of the sewage system can be determined via percolation test or soil classification. The methods are described in more detail in Section 8.2.1.2 of the OBC. For large subsurface disposal systems, the OBC method can be followed or Table 22-1 of the MECP’s Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008 provides suggested hydraulic and organic loading rates.
D.2.3
SOILS OF FRONTENAC COUNTY
Specific to the County of Frontenac, there is a major division in the bedrock formations occurring between the Precambrian and Ordovician rocks. In the northern part of the County, the Precambrian rocks are composed of igneous and metamorphosed sedimentary rocks. Granite, granitic gneiss, and limestone are found in the area. Ordovician limestones occur in the southern part of the County. The Black River group forms the bedrock in the south, with the exception of the southern part of Wolfe Island where the bedrock belongs to the Trenton group. The greatest area of the County is covered by till. This material varies greatly from the northern part of the county to the southern part, depending upon the nature of the underlying bedrock noted above. The till soils overlying the Precambrian Shield (northern part) are generally thin, and the nature of the relief reflects the bedrock relief. Most of the till soils overlying the Black River limestone (southern part) are also thin.
WSP June 2019 Page D-2
Page 200 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The soil materials along the southern border of the County consist of stone-free calcareous clay deposits broken in places by numerous outcrops of Precambrian rock. Silt-textured lacustrine materials cover an area from Kingston to Battersea, enclosed by limestone escarpments on the west and by Precambrian rock to the north and east. Coarse-textured soils, sands, and gravels are found in small areas scattered over the county, many of which may be shorelines of Lake Frontenac or Lake Champlain.48
D.3 PLANNING AND DESIGN OF COMMUNAL SEWAGE SYSTEMS D.3.1
DAILY DESIGN SEWAGE FLOW
The theoretical total daily design sewage flow for a site should be calculated based on the theoretical sewage flows for the proposed use of the development. If there are multiple uses on the site, the theoretical daily design sewage flow for the site should be based on the combined theoretical sewage flows for the individual occupancy uses. Theoretical sewage flows for residential type occupancies are provided in Table 8.2.1.3.A. of the OBC (2012), and Table 8.2.1.3.B for other types of occupancies. It should be noted that the theoretical sewage flows represent the peak maximum daily sewage flows for most developments. As this list in the OBC is not comprehensive, other documents that can be referenced to determine theoretical sewage flows include: •
Appendix 9.3.1, Manual of Policy, Procedures and Guidelines for Onsite Sewage Systems, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (1982); and
•
Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Water conservation techniques may also be employed at new developments, including the use of high efficiency appliances and fixtures within residential and commercial/office units, that may reduce the daily design sewage flow from theoretical values. The designer should take this into consideration when determining the design sewage flow for the system; however, consideration should be given to the resulting increase in sewage strength that may result from these changes.
D.3.2
DAILY DESIGN SEWAGE FLOWS FOR LARGE SYSTEMS
Communal sewage systems servicing a larger development will see smaller peaks in generated sewage flows than smaller systems that service only a few houses. For smaller systems, the theoretical daily design sewage flow should be used to calculate the design flow for the system. For larger communal systems, a value lower than the peak daily design flow may be more
48 Ontario Soil Survey. 1966. Soil Survey of Frontenac County.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 201 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
representative due to the buffering capacity of the system. Reduction of peak flows to more representative values should be completed with professional judgement, in consultation with the MECP. It is noted that for commercial developments the theoretical daily design sewage flow should be used unless reliable sewage flow data is available. The MECP may allow the use of recorded flow data to determine sewage design flows for an existing site, where reliable flow data exists and has been collected for a minimum of three (3) years. This would be decided on a case-bycase basis. Extraneous flows from inflow and infiltration should also be accounted for. This includes possible sources such as leakage of groundwater into sewers and building sewer connections, leakage through manhole covers, foundation drains, downspouts, etc. In general, the longer the collection system, the higher possibility for inflow and infiltration to the sewage system. Attention must be paid during design and construction of the collection system in order to reduce these extraneous flows to the sewage works significantly. For example, foundation drains and downspouts must be connected to the surface or stormwater system and should not be connected to the sanitary collection system. Leak testing on the collection system should also be performed as part of the commissioning process.
D.3.3
FLOW BALANCING
Flow balancing should be considered for all communal sewage systems. Flow balancing provides useable storage to buffer the downstream treatment system from peak flows, provides a consistent flow rate to the treatment system, and prevents the subsequent treatment processes from hydraulic overloading. The type of treatment being used will determine the requirement for flow balancing. For example, if a lagoon system is being used for sewage treatment, flow balancing would not specifically be required as lagoons are less susceptible to variations in flow. If a trickling filter is being used, the filter media has a specific loading rate that must be followed to meet performance standards, and thus balancing of flow would be much more important. The need for flow balancing will also depend on the use or occupancy of the development. The flow characteristics of the development’s occupancy must be considered during design. For example, schools would see the majority of sewage flow during the day on weekdays while residential sites would experience peaks during the morning and evening throughout the week.
D.3.4
APPROVALS PROCESS
Approvals for on-site sewage and disposal systems are governed by the local municipality or the MECP, and are generally reliant on the theoretical daily design sewage flows for the site. As stated in Chapter 22 of the MECP’s 2008 guidelines, the Ontario Building Code governs small individual or multiple sewage systems that have a daily design sewage flow of less than 10,000 WSP June 2019 Page D-4
Page 202 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
L/day and where both the system and the buildings they serve are completely within a single lot. These systems are reviewed and approved by the local municipality or health unit. Sewage systems with a design flow of greater than 10,000 L/day require an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) from the MECP, and are governed under Section #53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act (R.S.O. 1990). The system is considered an OWRA sewage works under these additional scenarios: •
If a single property contains several small systems (each rated at less than 10,000 L/day) but the combined rated capacity of the systems exceeds 10,000 L/day.
•
If the system is not entirely within the property of the building it serves, regardless of the capacity of the system.
The approval for each scenario will have different requirements. Table D-1 below summarizes the requirements and other details for each approvals process in the province of Ontario. Table D-1: Approvals Process for Sewage System Designs in Ontario
DAILY DESIGN SEWAGE FLOW FOR SEWAGE SYSTEM
10,000 L/DAY OR SURFACE DISCHARGE (ANY FLOW)
< 10,000 L/DAY Approval Document
Building Permit issued by the local municipality or health unit
Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) issued by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP)
Guidelines
Ontario Building Code (2012), Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008, MECP
Site Investigation
Pre-consultation with the MECP and/or Municipality as applicable
Ontario Building Code (2012), Ministry Other local municipal guidelines of Municipal Affairs and Housing such as planning policy and by-laws Studies Required
Sewage System Design Drawings Building Permit Application Other requirements of the municipality
Site Investigation Sewage System Design Report & Drawings Hydrogeological study including effluent Impact Study (subsurface disposal), or Assimilative Capacity Study and Mixing Zone Analysis (surface disposal) Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA, if required)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 203 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
DAILY DESIGN SEWAGE FLOW FOR SEWAGE SYSTEM
10,000 L/DAY OR SURFACE DISCHARGE (ANY FLOW)
< 10,000 L/DAY
Indigenous Engagement (if required) Other requirements outlined in Guideline to Applying for an Environmental Compliance Approval, MECP Fees
Building Permit Application fee (varies by municipality)
Varies, based on the site-specific information Fees outlined in the Minister’s Requirements for Fees – Application Fees for ECA under the Environmental Protection Act
Time to 10 days Process (once application has submitted to approving body)
Up to 1 year
Other studies or approvals that are not listed may be required for sewage system construction. This includes approval from the local Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and other requirements such as archaeological studies and land development studies (D-5-4 studies, D-5-4 studies). Other studies may be required.
D.3.5
PEER REVIEW
It is recommended that the County/ municipality have a peer review process in place for the engineering review of all communal sewage system designs within the County. Peer review is necessary to provide a thorough engineering review of a design submission as the Municipality will not have the requisite in-house expertise to review the adequacy of the design. This will promote good engineering practices in the design process, and limit the potential for system failure due to incomplete or inadequate design drawings. The MECP does not typically review designs for technical competency as their focus tends to be more aligned with discharge permitting (i.e. maximum permissible parameter concentrations), as such this peer review should be completed at the municipal level. The technical peer review should take place prior to submission to the MECP for an ECA application, and should be conducted by a qualified engineer. The qualified engineer should be
WSP June 2019 Page D-6
Page 204 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
licensed by Professional Engineers Ontario (PEO) and should have significant and recent expertise in the design and approval of large on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems.
D.3.6
WASTEWATER STRENGTH
The strength or quality of the raw sewage will influence the sewage system design. Consideration should be given to the source of the wastewater including domestic, commercial, process, etc. If the site is developed with multiple uses, the raw sewage quality should be based on the combined quality from the individual occupancy uses, similar to the calculation of sewage design flows. Information on raw sewage quality can be found in the following documents: •
Table 19-2 – Comparison of Contaminant Concentrations in Septage and Sewage, Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008, MECP
•
Chapter 3: Establishing Treatment System Performance Requirements, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Special consideration should be given to processes that could alter the strength of the wastewater coming into the treatment system, such as the following: •
Restaurant waste, which would be higher in organic matter and fats/oils/greases;
•
Process wastewater flows; and
•
Chemicals or other substances entering the sewage works that could inhibit or change the biological processes that occur in the sewage treatment works.
D.3.7
EVALUATION OF DISPOSAL METHODS
Given the established design parameters and site characteristics for a proposed development, the treatment and disposal method must be determined. As previously noted, there are two (2) main methods of disposal: •
Surface discharge; and
•
Subsurface discharge.
The following considerations should be made when determining a treatment and disposal method and include, but are not limited to, the following: •
Available land area;
•
Soils;
•
Hydrogeology;
•
Future capacity and expansion requirements;
•
Location of surface water features or discharge points;
•
Capital, Operations and Maintenance, and replacement costs;
•
Environmental sensitivity;
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 205 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-7
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Desired system complexity;
•
Design flows; and
•
Raw sewage quality.
Once a disposal method has been determined, the effluent criteria for the treatment system and the treatment system process prior to disposal can be chosen. The treatment process will differ based on the chosen method of disposal. The design process for each disposal type is described further in the following sections.
D.3.8
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OPTIONS
Along with disposal system alternatives, there are various treatment system alternatives that should be considered when undergoing the design process for a communal sewage treatment plant. Examples of alternative treatment methods include the following: •
Membrane Bioreactor (MBR);
•
Extended Aeration;
•
Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR);
•
Lagoon (Facultative and/or Aerated);
•
Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC); and
•
Trickling Filter.
The evaluation of alternative treatment methods must be conducted on a case-by-case basis, and should be evaluated based on technical, social, natural, and financial criteria by a qualified professional. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has produced numerous fact sheets on various treatment technologies, which are continually being updated as technologies change or new ones emerge. The “Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Package Plants” by the US EPA provides technical information on package plants commonly used in small communities, including a description of the technology, benefits and limitations, design criteria, performance, and costing information. The Fact Sheet is included in Appendix E. As technology is continually changing and advancing, the designer of a communal wastewater treatment system should evaluate current information on wastewater treatment technologies from third party sources such as the MECP and the US EPA during the design process.
D.3.9
SURFACE DISCHARGE
Disposal of sewage effluent to surface water requires an MECP ECA, regardless of the design sewage flow of the system. Surface disposal of effluent may become cost-prohibitive for smaller-scale developments due to ongoing operations and maintenance costs associated with the operator and sampling requirements, however may be advantageous for larger developments due to the reduced land requirements. WSP June 2019 Page D-8
Page 206 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
In general, the design and approvals process for a treatment system with surface disposal requires the following (although the order may vary): 1)
Complete background work and determine the preferred receiver.
Pre-consultation with the MECP.
Complete an Assimilative Capacity Study (ACS) of the receiver and, if required, a Mixing Zone Analysis.49
Complete a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA), if the project fits the criteria.
Determine effluent requirements.
Complete the detailed engineering designs for the contemplated treatment system and associated structures/systems.
Municipal peer review.
Apply to the MECP for an ECA.
Effluent requirements are determined in accordance with the following: •
MECP’s Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008
•
Dry-ditch criteria from Procedure B-1-5 Deriving Receiving-Water Based, Point-Source Effluent Requirements for Ontario Waters
•
Provincial Water Quality Objectives (1994)
The ACS will assess the receiver’s capacity to accept discharge from the proposed treatment plant in accordance with provincial guidelines.
D.3.10 SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS Subsurface disposal systems discharge effluent to the subsurface soils beneath the leaching bed. Subsurface disposal systems can be designed for small or larger-scale developments.
SMALL SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (< 10,000 L/DAY) Small subsurface disposal systems have daily design flows of less than 10,000 L/day and are governed under the Ontario Building Code (OBC, 2012). The overall design flow for the site must be less than 10,000 L/day, and the sewage system must be located entirely within the property boundary of lot the building of which it serves is situated on.
49 A Mixing Zone Analysis is a study to define an acceptable area around a surface water discharge outfall to mix and
dilute the sewage to acceptable levels in the receiving water body. This analysis is important as it helps to define what the acceptable sewage concentration will be exiting the sewage treatment plant. COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 207 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-9
AGENDA ITEM #b)
The design and sizing requirements for small subsurface disposal systems is provided in Part 8 of the OBC. Setback guidelines to structures, wells, water bodies, etc. are provided in Section 8.2.1.6.A. of the OBC. As per Section 8.7.7 of the OBC, Level IV treatment units must meet effluent requirements outlined in Columns 2 and 3 of Table 8.6.2.2., or 10 mg/L for both carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD5) and total suspended solids (TSS). Treatment units must comply with Section 8.6.2.2. of the OBC, and have been certified to CAN/BNQ 3680-600, “Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies”. It should be noted that this applies to residential uses and may not apply to mixed-use developments that include commercial use. While wastewater from office and light retail uses tends to be similar in sewage strength to residential uses, the sewage produced by restaurant and heavier commercial uses is different in character. Determination of appropriate systems and standards must be undertaken on a caseby-case basis. Table D-2 presents engineering best practices that should be considered during the design of small systems. Table D-2: Considerations during Small System Design
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES
Location and Orientation of Tankage Treatment tanks and leaching bed should be located and Leaching Bed in an area with adequate drainage; not to be located within a depressed area. The distribution pipes should be orientated perpendicular to the direction of effluent flow. The mantle is to be extended in any direction in which the effluent entering the soil or leaching bed moves horizontally. Bed Design
In order to improve effluent distribution within the leaching bed, tied header and footer pipes are recommended. False headers or distribution boxes on the leaching bed are also recommended.
Tank and Pipe Insulation
Tankage to be insulated to frost depth. All sanitary pipes and forcemains to be insulated under roadways and walkways at a great enough depth to ensure protection from frost and crushing.
WSP June 2019 Page D-10
Page 208 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES
Tank Access
Tankage to have adequate access over all inlet/outlet pipes, pumps, effluent filter, and other sewage system components that require maintenance. This would include risers to finished grade and lockable, tamper-proof lids.
Sealing Inlets/Outlets
All tankage outlets and inlets to be sealed with nonshrinking grout from the interior and exterior.
Waterproofing
If groundwater is encountered during the tank excavation, all tank seams shall be waterproofed with an exterior waterproof membrane (e.g. Blueskin).
Tank Bedding
Tanks to be installed on 50 mm of loose sand fill spread evenly over minimum 200 mm of compacted gravel or crushed stone.
Tank Burial
Tanks to be installed at an appropriate depth. Precast concrete tanks typically have a maximum burial depth of 1.0 m in non-traffic areas. Additional reinforcement is required for traffic areas and/or deep burial.
Reserve Capacity
Consideration to be given for future design flows and expansion at a site, specifically to future area requirements for tankage and leaching bed.
Buffering Capacity
Flow balancing provides useable storage to buffer the downstream treatment system from peak flows, provides a consistent flow rate to the treatment system, and prevents the subsequent treatment processes from hydraulic overloading.
Electrical Connections
All electrical connections to be installed by an electrician qualified by the Electrical Safety Authority in accordance with current regulations.
Pump Settings
Pump settings to dose via either demand-dosing or timer-dosing.
Pump Sizing
Pump sizing calculations to be conducted to determine ideal pump model for specific total dynamic head (TDH) and flow rating.
Pump Connections
Pumps should be installed with a quick disconnect so that they can be removed easily for servicing. Drain holes on the outlet pipe should be considered to
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 209 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-11
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES allow the pipe to drain freely and prevent freezing if burial depth is a concern.
Additional Sources of Effluent
The building sump, water softener, water treatment system, furnace condensate discharge, and eavestrough downspouts shall not be connected to the sewage system. All such flows to approved outlets located away from the tank and leaching bed areas.
LARGE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (> 10,000 L/DAY) Large subsurface disposal systems have a daily design flow of greater than 10,000 L/day and are regulated by the MECP, and are subject to the requirements of Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act (RSO 1990). Design guidelines for large systems are provided in Chapter 22 of the Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008. These guidelines state that “The designer of the large subsurface sewage disposal system is advised to consider, where appropriate and applicable, the design standards for small subsurface disposal systems contained in Part 8, Division B, of the Building Code”. This means that, in general, sizing standards should adhere to, at minimum, those given in the OBC. Setback requirements can be generally based on those given in the OBC but are required to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Table D-3 presents engineering best practices that should be considered during the design of large systems. These should be considered in addition to the best practices for small systems described in Table D-2. Table D-3: Considerations during Large System Design
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES
Pump Stations
Optimal pump type (e.g. grinder, vortex, submersible, sewage, effluent, etc.) to be determined based on wastewater characterization. Pump and forcemain sizing calculations to be conducted to determine ideal pump model for specific Total Dynamic Head (TDH) and flow rating. Adequate venting to be provided, including carbon filters and insect/vermin screens.
WSP June 2019 Page D-12
Page 210 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES Adequate access to pumps, floats, and other controls to be provided from grade, or adequate access equipment if entry to the pump station is required. Consideration for bar screens, pump screens or similar to catch large objects within the wastewater stream.
Control Room and Operator Work Areas
A central control room and operator work area may be provided to contain controls, chemical storage (if required), manuals, logbooks, etc. Ensure there is adequate indoor space for the operator (if required), including consideration for heating and ventilation.
Chemical Storage
Determine the requirements for chemical addition for the treatment system. Common chemicals used in the wastewater treatment process include metal coagulants, soda ash, chlorine, carbon addition, etc. Consideration should be made for explosion-proofing, secondary containment, heating, and venting of the chemical storage facility. The relative location of the chemical storage facility to the treatment tankage should be considered.
PLCs and SCADA Systems
The PLCs and/or SCADA will require an internet connection to allow for remote monitoring. The systems should be accessible and manageable if the Municipality is required to take over operation of the system.
Sampling Access / Monitoring
Access to monitoring for required points within the treatment system should be provided, including raw sewage, treated effluent, groundwater, etc. Flow data for raw sewage and treated effluent should be accessible and downloadable.
Groundwater Mounding and Monitoring
Mounding calculations should be conducted for subsurface disposal systems to ensure that adequate separation distance is provided as per OBC requirements. Groundwater monitoring ports should be installed within the leaching bed in order to monitor real-time mounding within the bed.
Municipal Requirements
Other requirements of the Municipality should be considered if the system will ultimately be taken over by the municipality. This would include aesthetics of the plant, product and specification grade, and other standards.
Back-up Power Back-up power should be considered. Generators should be adequately Supply and Back-up sized to ensure operation of the treatment plant. Equipment
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 211 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-13
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES Back up equipment (pumps, blowers, etc.) should be on hand for quick replacement in case of failure.
D.4 INSTALLATION OF COMMUNAL SEWAGE SYSTEMS D.4.1
SCHEDULE
Installation of the communal sewage system can occur following the receipt of a Building Permit from the municipality or ECA from the MECP. Construction of on-site sewage systems typically occurs during the spring to fall season as frozen ground conditions are not conducive to successful installation of subsurface disposal systems. Construction during the winter is nevertheless possible if certain precautions are taken. The construction schedule will depend on the scope of work and complexity or size of the project.
D.4.2
INSTALLATION INFORMATION
Construction of the system should be supervised by a Professional Engineer licenced by Professional Engineers Ontario, for any communal sewage system being constructed.
SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL SYSTEM INSTALLATION A subsurface disposal system is generally comprised of distribution piping within a stone trench, stone layer, or chamber system, installed in native soils or fill material. The distribution piping is often perforated 75 mm (3”) or 100 mm (4”) diameter PVC piping, surrounded by clean stone. Filter cloth is laid on top of the stone layer to prevent fine particles from entering the spaces in between the stone. The distribution piping or laterals are connected to a header pipe and footer pipe. The most likely causes of concern during installation of a subsurface disposal system are the following: •
Improper base cut preparation, including the base cut being prepared on topsoil or inappropriate fill material;
•
Importation of inappropriate fill materials (sand, stone, etc.) for the leaching bed, which can lead to premature failure of the bed;
•
Settling of piping within the leaching bed, which can lead to uneven distribution within the bed; and
•
Swales around the leaching bed area are not installed, or surface drainage is not directed away from the leaching bed area which can lead to oversaturation of the bed.
WSP June 2019 Page D-14
Page 212 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
With proper construction management and inspections these concerns can be mitigated. The following is a typical scope of work for the installation of a subsurface disposal system: •
Installation of perimeter siltation fencing (downgradient of leaching bed and surrounding bed area, to prevent erosion of sediment);
•
Remove and dispose of (off-site) any trees within 6 m of the proposed leaching bed;
•
Inspection and testing of the native soils prior to installation of the leaching bed to ensure conformance with the design specification;
•
Preparation of an appropriate base cut, including removal of existing topsoil and fill inappropriate fill material and scarification of the base soils;
•
Provide and place imported septic sand meeting the design specifications (if required). The imported material should be inspected and tested prior to installation to ensure conformance with the design specification;
•
Provide and install the specified stone and pipe areas for the distribution trenches. The imported stone material should be inspected and tested prior to installation to ensure conformance with the design specification. If a chambered system is being used, ensure that the chambers adhere to design specifications;
•
Provide and install PVC headers, split headers, leader pipes, tied ends and tracer wire for each distribution cell;
•
Provide and install permeable geotextile fabric over the stone layer;
•
Supply and install sand fill above the sand layer or trenches;
•
Provide and install HDPE polytube forcemains from the final pumping chamber to each header;
•
A licensed well contractor should install required monitoring wells (if applicable), complete with well screens and steel lockable casings;
•
Provide and place additional topsoil as needed to meet design requirements, re-installing stockpiled topsoil where available and of adequate quality, and fine grading of topsoil;
•
Construct swales alongside of the leaching bed area as designed;
•
Sod any slopes steeper than 4:1;
•
Hydroseed or sod the leaching bed upon completion of the fine grading. The hydroseed should be maintained (watered) until substantial grow in has occurred;
•
Removal of silt fencing and repair any areas affected by the construction of the leaching bed back to their pre-construction state.
SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM INSTALLATION The sewage treatment system is generally comprised of a series of tanks, typically installed in the following sequence: flow equalization tank, treatment tanks, effluent pump tank. The number, orientation, and sequence of tanks will be site-specific. Some considerations that need
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 213 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-15
AGENDA ITEM #b)
to be made during tank installation include, but are not limited to, waterproofing, tank access, insulation, and burial depth. The most likely causes of concern during installation of a treatment system are the following: •
Settling of tanks which can lead to improper flow between tanks;
•
Inadequate installation of waterproofing that can lead to groundwater infiltration into tanks;
•
Inadequate installation of insulation over tanks which can lead to pipe freezing and a reduction in treatment capabilities; and
•
Swales around the tank area are not installed, or surface drainage is not directed away from the tank area which can lead to infiltration into the tanks.
The following is a typical scope of work for the installation of a (buried) sewage treatment system: •
Excavation of appropriate areas for placement of the tanks;
•
Preparation of the base of the excavation, including the placement of bedding, for level tank installation;
•
Supply and installation of all sewage treatment and conveyance tanks;
•
Supply and install all plumbing connection between tanks;
•
Supply and install of insulation on forcemains where less than 1.5 m of cover and on gravity piping where less than 1.2 m cover;
•
Supply and install all access covers, vents, risers, etc. where required;
•
If high groundwater conditions exist at the site, tanks with dynamic water levels should be anchored. Anchoring should be designed by a Professional Engineer. Tank seams affected by high groundwater elevations should be waterproofed with an exterior membrane;
•
Supply and install insulation to 1.2 m below ground level (or frost depth) on top and sides of treatment tanks;
•
Supply and install all inner workings of the sewage treatment system;
•
Supply and install all electrical connections within and from the tanks to the control area and from the control area to the available on-site power supply (typically subcontracted by an electrician);
•
Supply and install the required control panels;
•
Backfill and properly grade the treatment tank area. Apron swale should be constructed around tankage to shed water from the proposed tank area;
•
Test and support the commissioning of the system;
WSP June 2019 Page D-16
Page 214 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Train the owner as per the use and general maintenance of the system.
Figure D-1: Installation of a communal wastewater treatment system
D.4.3
INSTALLATION INSPECTIONS
It is recommended that a Professional Engineer complete periodic inspection of the sewage works during installation to assess whether the installation completed by the contractor adheres to the approved design. A typical inspection schedule for the installation of a sewage system with subsurface disposal is noted below. The requirements for inspections would be scaled depending on the size and complexity of the project:
PRE-CONSTRUCTION SITE MEETING a) Discuss installation, site access, installation schedule and other pertinent information. b) Samples of the septic stone and the sand fill should be provided to the Engineer for analysis prior to installation in order to help ensure material is appropriate and meets the design requirements prior to installation.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 215 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-17
AGENDA ITEM #b)
BASE GRADE INSPECTION a) The length and width of the leaching bed excavation is as per specification. b) Base soils are as per design. c) Based on the excavation is scarified and free of topsoil. d) Elevation of the excavation is accurate, or is within standards of good engineering practice. Elevations have been confirmed via survey equipment.
SAND FILL, STONE AND PIPE, AND TANK INSPECTION a) The sand fill and stone material is consistent with preliminary testing results based on a visual inspection and review of pit receipt obtained from installer/supplier (if available). b) The thickness of the sand fill is appropriate. c) The number of distribution pipe runs installed is as designed. d) The length of the distribution pipe is as designed. e) The spacing of the pipes, centre to centre, is appropriate. f)
The elevation and elevation change across the distribution runs is appropriate.
g) The thickness of the stone trenches is appropriate. h) The trenches are covered with permeable geotextile fabric. i)
Tracer wire (or other means of detection) is located around the stone area.
j)
The sewage tanks are appropriately sized and CSA approved.
k) The sewage tanks are installed in the proposed location as per the design. l)
The inner workings of the treatment system are installed as per the design, including treatment media, chemical dosing, recirculation pumps, piping, etc.
m) The gravity connections have sufficient fall.
PUMPS, ALARMS AND FINAL GRADING INSPECTION a) The pump(s) are installed properly and are functional. b) The pump discharge rate meets the design dosage volume based on float settings. c) The high-level alarm (visible/audible) is present and functional. d) The trenches have been backfilled with appropriate material in accordance with the design. e) The thickness of the cover on the leaching bed is appropriate. f)
The topsoil on the leaching bed is good quality and is the appropriate thickness.
g) Confirmation that there is high quality sand fill between the stone layer and topsoil as specified. h) The leaching bed has been sodded/seeded to prevent erosion.
WSP June 2019 Page D-18
Page 216 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
i)
The final grading on the leaching beds has been completed as designed and in a manner that will shed water from the surface of the leaching bed.
j)
Grading around the sewage tanks is appropriate and sheds water away from tank lids.
k) Swales around the leaching bed and tanks have been installed in accordance with the design. Once the sewage system has been inspected and properly installed a Certification Letter should be prepared and signed by the Professional Engineer; typically, a requirement of the MECP. A start-up notification should also be prepared once the system has been commissioned in order to notify approving authorities that the system is in use.
D.5 COMMISSIONING INFORMATION D.5.1
COMMISSIONING OF THE SYSTEM
Once the sewage system has been installed, including the completion of all plumbing and electrical connections, the system can be commissioned and started up. The treatment system manufacturer/supplier will typically have a technician on site to commission the treatment system. The contractor must also be present on site for commissioning. There should be clean water in the system in order for commissioning to take place.
D.5.2
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
An Operations and Maintenance (O&M) manual must be produced for the sewage system that includes a general overview of the sewage system components, operational and maintenance procedures, contingency procedures, and outline the inspection program for the sewage system. The O&M manual should be kept on site at all times for reference. Important information that should be contained in the O&M manual includes, but is not limited to, the following: •
System overview
•
Approval document (e.g. ECA)
•
Construction certification letter
•
As-built drawings
•
Operation procedures and system maintenance
•
Inspection program
•
Contingency procedures
•
Complaint procedures
•
Operation log reports
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 217 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-19
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Maintenance contracts (if available)
The treatment unit supplier should also provide maintenance information specific to the specific system.
D.6 MONITORING, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMUNAL SEWAGE SYSTEM Ongoing monitoring and maintenance of the sewage system is critical to ensure proper operation of the system, to extend the lifespan of the system, and to minimize impacts to the surrounding environment. Table D-4 presents engineering best practices that should be considered for monitoring of communal sewage systems. These should be considered in addition to monitoring that is required as part of the ECA. Table D-4: Considerations for Environmental Monitoring
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES
Monitoring Locations
ECAs will typically define the minimum monitoring required for sewage systems. In order to properly assess treatment performance of a system, it is often recommended to monitor at multiple points within a treatment system and for a range of parameters. At minimum, the raw sewage entering the treatment system and treated effluent prior to disposal should be monitored. Additional sampling points within the treatment system can be added depending on the complexity of the treatment process.
Monitoring Parameters
Similar to monitoring locations, ECAs will typically outline the minimum required monitoring parameters. It is recommended to more fully characterize the sewage so that system optimization and troubleshooting is possible. For raw sewage, the minimum recommended parameters are: 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrate, nitrite, total phosphorus (TP), alkalinity, pH. For treated effluent, the minimum parameters are: 5-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand, TSS, TP TKN, TAN, nitrite, nitrite, alkalinity, pH.
WSP June 2019 Page D-20
Page 218 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
ITEM
CONSIDERATIONS AND BEST PRACTICES Field pH, conductivity, and temperature should also be measured for all samples. Microbiology should be considered for certain sites.
Groundwater Monitoring
For applications with subsurface disposal, groundwater monitoring may be recommended to monitor off-site impacts as a result of the sewage system. Parameters of concern are typically the following: nitrite, nitrate, total phosphorus (TP), chloride (Cl).
Groundwater Mounding Monitoring
Groundwater mounding within the leaching bed can be measured through the installation of groundwater monitoring wells within the leaching bed area. The monitoring wells should be positioned to capture the highest groundwater mound conditions in the bed.
Surface Water Monitoring
For applications with surface water disposal, or subsurface disposal that is expected to impact surface waters, surface water monitoring may be recommended. Parameters of concern are typically the following: 5-day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), total phosphorus (TP), microbiology, pH, temperature.
Sample Collection and Analysis
Samples should be collected in general accordance with the methods and protocols outlined in the MECP’s Procedure F-10-1 “Procedure for Sampling and Analysis Requirements for Municipal and Private Sewage Treatment Works (Liquid Waste Streams Only)”. Samples should be collected in pre-cleaned, laboratory supplied sample containers. After collection, samples should be placed within a clean cooler containing ice to ensure cold transport to the laboratory.
Flow Monitoring
D.6.1
Sewage flows to the sewage system should be monitored and recorded on a daily basis.
MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS
Ongoing maintenance activities will differ based on the type of treatment and disposal method in the sewage system. Maintenance and operation documents for select systems approved for use in Ontario have been included in Appendix E. It should be noted that these documents apply to residential units COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 219 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-21
AGENDA ITEM #b)
and have been included to provide insight into maintenance activities that can be expected for sewage treatment systems. The maintenance programs for communal systems would typically be more comprehensive. Table D-5 summarizes maintenance considerations for typical treatment and disposal systems (surface and subsurface). Table D-5: Typical Maintenance Items for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems
COMPONENT
SUBCOMPONENT
MAINTENANCE ITEM
FREQUENCY
Treatment System
Sludge Storage Tanks
Pump sludge storage or septic tanks
Once every 3 to 5 years, or when the solids exceed 1/3rd of the tank volume
Clean inlet tee and outlet baffle of Monthly debris Clean effluent filter
Annually or more frequent (as needed)
Flow Equalization, Effluent Pump Systems
Pump replacement
As needed, typically every 2 to 5 years
Floats, wiring replacement
As needed
Treatment Media
Replace treatment system media As needed, typically (e.g. foam, peat moss, etc.) every 15 to 30 years
Blowers, Sludge Return Pumps
Blower/sludge return pump replacement
As needed, typically every 2 to 5 years
Chemical Dosing System
Fill chemical dosing tanks
As needed, typically every 3 to 6 months
Chemical pump replacement
Every 2 to 5 years
Check for alarms or errors
Daily
Control Panel
WSP June 2019 Page D-22
Page 220 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COMPONENT
SUBCOMPONENT
MAINTENANCE ITEM
FREQUENCY
Subsurface Disposal System
Leaching Bed
Maintain short, manicured grass
Weekly
Walk leaching bed area and check for break-outs, soft spots, erosion, etc.
Weekly
Ensure swales are intact and drainage is directed away from leaching bed
Monthly
Surface Disposal
Outlet Structure
Clean outlet pipe and/or structure Annually free of debris and blockages
D.7 FAILURE RATES, REHABILITATION COSTS, AND INSURANCE RATES IN ONTARIO COMMUNITIES The County had requested information regarding failure rates and rehabilitation costs for decentralized systems in other municipalities, similar to what is expected to be installed in the County of Frontenac. WSP was unable to obtain this information, as it is anticipated that the communal systems proposed in the County will be significantly smaller than many existing communal wastewater treatment plants, and that failure rates, capital costs, insurance rates, etc. would not be directly comparable. The anticipated smaller design flow rates for future communal services in the County will lead itself to less complex mechanical systems, and decreased instances of significant failure. Therefore, WSP has based the failure rates and rehabilitation costs on our experience with hundreds of other similar-sized on-site sewage systems that have been completed for residential, commercial, and institutional developments. Flows for these systems can range from 8,000 L/day (approximately 5 homes) to 100,000 L/day (approximately 100 homes). It is expected that these systems would be more representative of what would be installed in the County of Frontenac in terms of size and sewage design flow. The mechanical workings of these systems, failure rates, and rehabilitation costs are well understood by WSP and have been used to support the creation of the financial model.
D.8 FURTHER REFERENCES The following documents (or their successor documents) can be referenced when considering communal sewage servicing within Ontario: •
Design Guidelines for Sewage Works (2008), Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks;
•
Ontario Building Code (2012), Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 221 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page D-23
AGENDA ITEM #b)
•
Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual (2012), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
•
Provincial Water Quality Objectives (1994), Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks;
•
Manual of Policy, Procedures and Guidelines for Onsite Sewage Systems, Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (1982); and
•
Procedure B-1-5 Deriving Receiving-Water Based, Point-Source Effluent Requirements for Ontario Waters.
WSP June 2019 Page D-24
Page 222 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
E
ENGINEERING BEST PRACTICES - ATTACHMENTS
Page 223 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 224 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Ecoflo Biofilter Residential Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Congratulations on your purchase of an Ecoflo® Biofilter system from Premier Tech Aqua (PTA). With the Ecoflo® Biofilter system, you have wisely chosen to protect your health as well as the environment. This manual contains information on the operation, operating guidelines, maintenance and warranties of the Ecoflo® Biofilter. For additional information, contact our customer service at 1 800 632-6356 or visit our website at PREMIERTECHAQUA.COM.
Operating Principle Onsite wastewater treatment systems must respect applicable local rules and regulations. These systems are specifically designed to treat residential wastewater to such a level that treated effluent can be safely returned to the environment. Typically, an onsite wastewater treatment system is composed of 2 to 3 main treatment steps depending on site constraints: primary treatment, treatment system and if required, polishing treatment.
① Primary treatment The primary/septic tank is the primary treatment. It clarifies wastewater by letting suspended solids settle to the bottom and retaining floating matter to prevent premature clogging of the treatment system. It is strongly recommended that the primary/septic tank be equipped with an effluent filter. Every primary/septic tank and effluent filter shall be installed according to the local regulations. For more information on the operation, operating guidelines, maintenance and warranties of PTA’s primary/septic tanks with effluent filter, please refer to the primary/septic tanks Owner’s Manuals which can be found at PREMIERTECHAQUA.COM.
② Treatment system Once wastewater has passed through the primary/septic tank, it then flows towards the Ecoflo® Biofilter. Inside the biofilter, a tipping bucket equally disperses the wastewater on specially designed plates which evenly distribute the wastewater on top of the filtering media. The wastewater then trickles through the natural filtering media. The treated effluent can then be discharged to the environment through an appropriate dispersal/disposal mean in accordance to local regulations. The Ecoflo® Biofilter’s operating principle allows the system to be used continuously or intermittently without requiring any special precaution or having any impact on the quality of the treatment. In most cases, no specific action from the owner is required to start the system. The model and the number of Ecoflo® Biofilter are determined by the domestic wastewater flow per day. The selection of the model also depends on the available surface area, the topography of the lot, as well as the type, permeability and depth of the natural soil on site.
③ Polishing treatment When required, the Ecoflo® Biofilter can be combined with PTA’s disinfection filter (FDi), a UV disinfection unit (DiUV) or a phosphorus removal unit (DpEC) to reduce respectively pathogen concentrations or phosphorus. For more information on the operation, operating guidelines, maintenance, and warranties of PTA’s FDi, DiUV or DpEC, please refer to the products’ Owner’s Manuals, which can be found at PREMIERTECHAQUA.COM.
Premier Tech Aqua
1/10
Page 225 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Ecoflo® Biofilter Models The Ecoflo® Biofilter can be found in different model series, which are ST, STB, EC, EC5 and EC7 and each has different characteristics. The model number of the Ecoflo® Biofilter relates to its characteristics, as presented in the following table. NOTE: Some model series may not be approved in your area.
ST and STB model series:
EC5 model series (maximum applicable HLR 500 L/m2d or 12.25 gal/ft2d)
Premier Tech Aqua
2/10
Page 226 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
EC7 model series (maximum applicable HLR 700 L/m2d or 17.2 gal/ft2d)
Installation Diagrams NOTE: The installation diagrams below show the Ecoflo® Biofilter with polyethylene shells. Primary/septic tank with effluent filter
Ecoflo® Biofilter Infiltration discharge
Primary/septic tank with effluent filter
Ecoflo® Biofilter Gravity discharge
Primary/septic tank with effluent filter
Premier Tech Aqua
Ecoflo® Biofilter Pumped discharge
3/10
Page 227 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Operating Guidelines Type of wastewater that can be treated by an Ecoflo® Biofilter: Domestic wastewater (for example: wastewater from isolated dwellings).
It is NOT RECOMMENDED to discharge any of the following substances into the septic system:
Oil and grease (motor oil, cooking oil, etc.); Wax and resins; Paints and solvents; Any kind of petroleum product; Any kind of pesticide; Any kind of septic tank additive; Any kind of toxic substance; Anything not easily biodegradable (for example, coffee beans, cigarette butts, sanitary napkins, tampons, condoms, cotton swab, etc.).
AND
NEVER open or go inside the primary/septic tank or the Ecoflo® Biofilter. Keep all lids of the septic system accessible at all times. NEVER cover them with mulch, dirt or any permanent structure (patio, swing, shed, etc.). NEVER connect a drain pipe, roof gutter, sump pump or air conditioner drain to the septic system. NEVER discharge content or water from a water softener backwash, a spa or pool in your septic system. NEVER discharge wastewater from a recreation vehicle (camping trailer, caravan, etc.) into any of the components of your septic system. NEVER use automatic toilet bowl cleaners Make sure all lids of the septic system are at least 50 mm (2”) above the surface of the landscaped lot. NEVER install a riser on an open bottom fibreglass Ecoflo® Biofilter. NEVER install a riser on polyethylene Ecoflo® Biofilter with a separate pumping vault access. NEVER install more than one (1) extra 150 mm (6") riser on polyethylene Ecoflo® Biofilter with only a main access. NEVER install more than ONE (1) RISER on a concrete Ecoflo® Biofilter. Use only PTA products. NEVER plant trees within 6 m (20’) of the Ecoflo® Biofilter lid and within 2 m (6’ 6") of the absorption bed. ALWAYS maintain the surface of the lid of the Ecoflo ® Biofilter free of any accumulated material or too close to blown snow, backfill, landscaping material, rocks, the bottom of a slope, an embankment or a retaining wall, etc. Minimum distances to respect are 5 m (16’ 5") for a fiberglass shell Ecoflo ® unit, 4 m (13’ 1") for a polyethylene unit and 3 m (9’ 10") for a concrete unit.
By respecting these guidelines, you contribute to the proper operation of your septic system and help prolong the life of your Ecoflo® Biofilter filtering media. Failure to abide by these guidelines may, at Premier Tech Aqua’s discretion, render the warranty invalid.
Owner’s responsibility The owner must respect all existing laws and regulations regarding the system’s effluent quality and its discharge into the environment. The owner of the wastewater treatment system is responsible for its installation, operation and maintenance. The system’s warranty begins upon purchase. Should the start-up be delayed, it is the customer’s responsibility to inform Premier Tech Aqua about it so the first maintenance, which is included in the purchase price, is postponed. If the first maintenance has been performed prior to the client’s call, Premier Tech Aqua reserves the right to decide whether another maintenance, free of charge or not, will be carried out the following year. No request for delayed start-up will be accepted any later than one (1) year after the purchase date without it affecting the product’s warranties.
Premier Tech Aqua
4/10
Page 228 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Keep heavy objects off your septic system Never drive a vehicle or place objects weighing more than 225 kg (500 lb) too close of the lid of your Ecoflo® Biofilter. Minimum distances to respect are 5 m (16’ 5") for a fiberglass shell Ecoflo ® unit, 4 m (13’ 1") for a polyethylene unit and 3 m (9’ 10") for a concrete unit. If you are planning any kind of landscaping or any other type of work on the property (i.e.: snow removal, lawn mowing, excavation, etc.), make sure you advise all those involved, so they do not damage your septic system. It is recommended to note where your septic system elements are located.
About your home Your home must be equipped with an air vent that is in proper working order and all plumbing must comply with the applicable standards of the building code in your location. Every septic tank must be ventilated by an air duct with a diameter of at least 100 mm (4") or be connected to the air vent of the isolated dwelling being served. Premier Tech Aqua strongly recommends using a pipe with a diameter of 100 mm (4") for the air vent. Any change in the use of your home or any modification to your Ecoflo ® Biofilter must be authorized by the local authorities, and Premier Tech Aqua must be advised. If this requirement is not fully met, the warranty for your Ecoflo® Biofilter will be null and void.
Maintenance Primary/septic tank Empty your primary/septic tank every two to four years or if the level of sludge measured exceed the 2/3 of the total height of water in the tank. This helps to keep your septic system in proper working order. Every primary/septic tank and effluent filter shall be inspected and maintained as prescribed by local regulations. If your home is equipped with a garbage disposal or a sewage pump, we strongly recommend emptying your primary/septic tank more frequently than the frequency noted above. Using this kind of equipment increases the amount of sludge in the primary/septic tank. To have complete records of the maintenance performed on your septic system, we recommend that you to keep the proof of maintenance (invoice) with this Owner’s Manual. IMPORTANT: Primary/septic tanks can be emptied in several ways that can be classified into two categories: complete emptying and selective emptying. Complete emptying, the most common, consists of completely pumping the contents of the primary/septic tank. It’s easy to check if the work was properly done because the primary/septic tank will be completely empty when the vacuum truck leaves the site. Selective emptying is divided into two subcategories: with a filter (or recycled) or without a filter. The method with a filter requires a truck that has been adapted for this type of emptying, that is, one that separates and retains the solids from the wastewater. The mechanically clarified water is then returned to the primary/septic tank. The selective method without a filter allows the solids to settle while in the truck before the water is returned to the primary/septic tank. As such, in an effort to ensure the Ecoflo® Biofilter continues to perform optimally, it is very important that you ensure than the water that is returned to the primary/septic tank has been properly clarified and does not contain or contains very few suspended solids. We also recommend you to call one of the members of PTA’s local partners. He will assist and verify if the work is done according to your specific needs to best protect your Ecoflo® Biofilter system.
Effluent filter Under normal operating conditions, as described in this manual, an effluent filter that complies with local regulations should operate efficiently for many years. It must be cleaned every time the primary/septic tank is emptied, as established or recommended by local authorities.
Ecoflo® Biofilter The owner of a biofiltration system shall follow the manufacturer’s recommendations regarding the maintenance of the system. For that purpose, he must at all times have a valid contract with the manufacturer or its local representative and, depending on the local regulations, a copy of the contract may have to be filed to the authorities.
Premier Tech Aqua
5/10
Page 229 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Annual maintenance is important to ensure optimal performance of your Ecoflo® Biofilter and essential to maintain its warranty. Therefore, your biofilter must be serviced annually for the duration of its useful life. According to local regulations, more than 1 visit per year may be required. The maintenance of your Ecoflo® Biofilter shall be carried out by one of our duly trained service providers. This service includes a visual inspection of all components and a verification of the operation, as well as maintenance of the filtering media. For maintenance purposes and to replace the filtering media, you must ensure that your system’s lid is easily accessible. Never cover or bury the lid of the Ecoflo® Biofilter. After each inspection, you will be given a maintenance record. Keep it with this manual in a safe place. At the end of its normal life span (ten (10) years for EC, EC5 and EC7 model series and eight (8) years for ST and STB model series), the filtering media is analyzed by one of our authorized agents. Under normal usage, if the filtering media has not been abused and the operating guidelines have been respected, the filtering media might not have to be replaced and can be used for some additional years. However, your Ecoflo® Biofilter’s filtering media must be replaced before the system’s treatment capacity and performance begins to deteriorate. The filtering media is easily pumped out using a truck adapted to emptying primary/septic tanks. The new filtering media is then installed by an authorized agent or the pumper. To know more about the maintenance of your Ecoflo ® Biofilter, refer to your Maintenance Agreement. If you need help or more information, please call our Customer Service Department at 1 800 632-6356 or visit our website at PREMIERTECHAQUA.COM.
Ecoflo® Biofilter with Pump Some Ecoflo Biofilters have an integrated pumping station (other situations may require a separate pumping station), that directs the treated effluent to an appropriate disposal mean according to local regulations. The electromechanical components are included in this system. Here are some of the details.
Visual and audio alarm system The pumping station is equipped with a high-water-level float connected to an alarm system. This alarm system must be installed inside the residence (home) so it can be heard when it is activated. The following information describes how this system works. A red indicator lights up and an audible alarm is heard when the water level in the Ecoflo® Biofilter is unusually high. If an alarm is activated, contact Premier Tech Aqua’s After-Sales Service Department because the incident has to be checked. To silence the alarm, press the “SILENCE” button. The “TEST” button lets you check if the alarm system is working properly. During a test, the red indicator should light up and an audio alarm should be heard.
Alarm box
In the event of a power failure, the alarm system continues to function on an emergency 9-volt alkaline battery (not supplied). Using a rechargeable battery is not recommended. NOTE: Replace the emergency battery every 12 months, each time the alarm is activated or whenever there is a power failure. If the battery is weak, the system will beep once every minute. When this occurs, replace the battery immediately. To replace the 9-volt battery: Disconnect the alarm box and remove it from the wall (the battery must be inserted on the side of the box). Open the cover of the 9-volt battery compartment and replace the battery with a 9-volt alkaline battery. Close the cover, reinstall the box on the wall and reconnect it. If the alarm is activated, press the “RESET/TEST” button to initialize it. Premier Tech Aqua
6/10
Page 230 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Electrical connections All electrical connections must be done by a certified electrician and using seal connectors is mandatory. Premier Tech Aqua recommends installing the power box on top of the pumping station’s insulating board to avoid humidity problems. Use two (2) separate circuit-breakers, one to operate the pump and the other to connect the alarm box. Do not connect anything else to these circuitbreakers (for example, a household appliance). They must be used exclusively for the pump and the alarm box.
What to do in case of… An activated alarm If an alarm is activated, unrelated to a power failure, contact Premier Tech Aqua’s After-Sales Service Department so the problem can be identified and corrected.
A prolonged power failure If a power failure that occurs during winter is prolonged, protect the components of your septic system against freezing. If you have any questions to restart your system, contact Premier Tech Aqua’s After-Sales Service Department.
Flooding Certain sites are prone to flooding or to rises in groundwater levels. This can lead to a malfunction in your septic system or alter the performance of your Ecoflo® Biofilter. If this happens, contact Premier Tech Aqua’s After-Sales Service Department.
Backflow Backflow rarely occurs. But if it does happen, the primary/septic tank is usually the cause. Your primary/septic tank installer or primary/septic tank pumper can generally take care of the situation.
Odours All septic systems are apt to generate gases and odours. The position of the air vent, as well as other factors unrelated to the Ecoflo® Biofilter itself, can prevent septic gases from dispersing properly and lead to odours. If this happens, contact Premier Tech Aqua’s After-Sales Service Department.
If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to contact Premier Tech Aqua at 1 800 632-6356.
The information contained in this document is based upon the latest information available at the time of publication and is designed to provide you with a general introduction to our products. We make no warranties or representations as to its accuracy. We are continually upda-ting and improving our products and reserve the right to amend, discontinue, alter or change specifications and prices without prior notice. Ecoflo® is a brand of Premier Tech Ltd. The Ecoflo ® Biofilter is protected under patents: CA2499637; US7097768; ES2285173; EP1539325 (BE, FR). Notice issued on 2016-01-12. For current data regarding all patent application(s) and patent(s) for this product or any part thereof, consult the website patentmarking.premiertech.com (references: 3685). © Premier Tech Ltd, 2017
Premier Tech Aqua
7/10
Page 231 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Certificate of Warranty for Ecoflo® Biofilter
- PREAMBLE Premier Tech Technologies Ltd. (hereinafter called “Premier Tech”) is proud to provide its customers with an exclusive wastewater treatment system guaranteed by an innovative Warranty.
(a) Any damage or problem caused by a fortuitous event or “force majeure”, such as, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, an earthquake, a flood, frost, hurricane, landslide, explosion or dynamiting; (b) Any damage or problem caused by the fault or act of a third party including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the execution of landscaping work; (c) Any damage or problem arising from a defective installation carried out by a person trained by Premier Tech, or any installation, modification, correction or addition carried out by a person not trained by Premier Tech; (d) Any damage or problem arising from any installation, modification, correction or addition to the treatment system carried out after installation of the Ecoflo® Biofilter without prior written approval from Premier Tech; (e) Any damage or problem caused by the use of a septic tank that does not comply with the applicable regulations and/or with Premier Tech’s specifications, as described in the Owner’s Manual; (f) Any damage or problem, if it is shown that the usage of the Ecoflo® Biofilter was not in accordance with the instructions and guidelines described in the Owner’s Manual; (g) Any damage or problem, if the maintenance of the Ecoflo® Biofilter was not carried out by a person authorized by Premier Tech, in accordance with the Maintenance Agreement; (h) Any damage or problem caused by an omission or act of the Customer or the Customer’s Successors including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, refusal to allow access to the system for maintenance; (i) Any damage or problem, if it is found that the Customer or the Customer’s Successors have modified or changed the use of the property serviced by the Ecoflo® Biofilter resulting in the alteration of the nature or quality of wastewater being treated and/or that constitutes a violation of the applicable regulations; (j) Any damage or problem caused by and/or resulting from the work carried out to access to the Ecoflo® Biofilter, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, excavation, snow removal or demolition; (k) Any damage or problem resulting from the condition of the site or of the soil and not reported or not properly reported to Premier Tech by the Customer or the person undertaking the site investigation.
For the application and interpretation of this Warranty, “Customer” shall mean the person who has purchased an Ecoflo® Biofilter (hereinafter called “Initial Purchaser”), for a residential installation, as well as any subsequent purchaser (hereinafter called “Subsequent Purchaser(s)”), in accordance with the provisions of section 8 of this Warranty. “Successor(s)” shall mean any other person entitled to exercise the same rights as the Customer under the law. 2. NATURE OF THE WARRANTY 2.1. Ecoflo® Biofilter Premier Tech warrants to the Customer that the filtering media of the Ecoflo® Biofilter shall function properly for a period of ten (10) years for EC, EC5, EC7, ST and STB model series (except ST and STB models with 100% peat filtering media that shall function properly for eight (8) years) from the date of purchase by the Initial Purchaser (proof of purchase required). Except as provided in sections 2.2 and 2.3 below, Premier Tech also warrants all parts of the Ecoflo® Biofilter components against any manufacturing defect for a period of ten (10) years from the date of purchase by the Initial Purchaser (proof of purchase required). The first two years of the warranty also cover the labour. 2.2. Concrete Premier Tech does not offer any additional Warranty on the shell of the concrete Ecoflo® Biofilter. Accordingly, the Customer shall rely on the local concrete manufacturer’s Warranty policy. 2.3. Pump, floats, alarm box and junction box The pump, floats, alarm box and junction box included with the Ecoflo® Biofilter are guaranteed for two (2) years (parts only), from the date of purchase by the Initial Purchaser (proof of purchase required). The first year of the warranty also covers the labour. Premier Tech’s conventional Warranty is expressly limited to the text of this Certificate and valid provided the Ecoflo ® Biofilter was installed in accordance with applicable regulations and with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
PARTICULAR EXCLUSIONS It is further expressly understood that the Customer may not carry out or cause to be carried out any repair or verification of the Ecoflo® Biofilter sold to him, or attempt to carry out any work or to apply any corrective measures whatsoever to said work, before notifying Premier Tech in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of this Warranty and before Premier Tech has visited the site, within a reasonable time following receipt of said notice, to assess the situation.
NOTICE For this Warranty to be valid, the Customer must notify Premier Tech in writing immediately upon the appearance of any indication of an anomaly or irregularity in the Ecoflo ® Biofilter. Such notice shall be mailed to Premier Tech’s Head Office at 1, avenue Premier, Rivière-du-Loup, Québec, G5R 6C1, CANADA or by facsimile at (418) 862-6642. Upon receipt of this notice, Premier Tech shall examine the situation and, if necessary, take appropriate corrective measures in accordance with the terms of this Warranty.
If the Customer carries out or causes to be carried out repairs, or attempts to repair or to apply corrective measures of any kind whatsoever to the Ecoflo® Biofilter sold to him without prior authorization by Premier Tech, this Warranty shall be considered null and void and Premier Tech shall be considered completely discharged from any and all of its obligations under this Warranty.
- GENERAL EXCLUSIONS The following damages or problems are excluded from the Warranty: Premier Tech Aqua
8/10
Page 232 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Certificate of Warranty for Ecoflo® Biofilter 6. INDEMNITIES AND DAMAGES Subject to the application of the provisions and exclusions provided for in this Warranty, Premier Tech’s liability and obligations regarding any corrective measure carried out or any attempt to correct an indicated problem shall be limited to replacing the filtering media and/or one or several components of the Ecoflo® Biofilter and to supplying the required labour, if applicable.
this Warranty and the legislation in effect in the Province of Quebec. 11. PRIORITY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF WARRANTY This Warranty supersedes any contract or understanding, written or verbal, entered into between the Customer and Premier Tech. In the event of contradiction between this Warranty and any other documents and/or contracts entered into between the Customer and Premier Tech, this Warranty shall prevail.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Premier Tech’s compensation or indemnification obligation shall be limited to the provisions of section 6 of this Certificate of Warranty and Premier Tech shall not be held liable for any other damage or loss that may have been suffered or incurred by the Customer or any third party in connection with the Ecoflo® Biofilter, its parts and/or components which originate thereof.
PURCHASERS AND SUCCESSORS Subject to the provisions of this Warranty and especially those of section 8, this Warranty shall continue to be valid for Subsequent Purchasers and Successors and shall continue to have full effect until the end of the agreed Warranty period provided for in section 2 of this Certificate.
No additional warranty, express or implied, hence excluding any direct or indirect consequential damages (not limited to but including third parties loss) concerning the design, sale or use of the Ecoflo® Biofilter and/or services provided by Premier Tech is hereby granted. Premier Tech’s liability under its warranty obligation shall in no case exceed the cost of the Ecoflo® Biofilter. 8. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP In the event of transfer of ownership, sale, assignment or disposal in any way whatsoever of the Customer’s property to a third party, this Warranty shall continue to apply if and only if the Subsequent Purchaser or the Successor confirms, by forwarding the attached “Notice of New Property Owner” to Premier Tech within a reasonable delay, that he/she is the new owner of the property, he/she understands and is aware of the content of this Certificate of Warranty and accepts its terms and conditions. The person who proceeds with the transfer, sale, assignment or disposal of any way whatsoever of the property undertakes to hand over to the Subsequent Purchaser or the Successor the Certificate of Warranty provided upon completion of the work, as well as the Owner’s Manual and, if applicable, the Maintenance and Environmental Monitoring Program for the Ecoflo® Biofilter. Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of section 8 of this Certificate of Warranty may, at Premier Tech’s discretion, render it invalid or to be rejected. 9. INSPECTION The Customer and/or the Customer’s Successors shall allow Premier Tech or its duly authorized representatives to carry out all necessary monitoring and inspections, as required, for implementation of this Warranty. If the Customer and/or the Customer’s Successors notify Premier Tech of an alleged defect or malfunction of the Ecoflo® Biofilter and that, after inspection, it is found that no such defect or malfunction exists or that such defect or malfunction is excluded from or does not apply to the Warranty, a minimum charge of $200.00 plus direct expenses shall be paid by the Customer and/or the Customer’s Successors for the cost of the inspection. 10. INTERPRETATION The terms and conditions of this Warranty shall be interpreted according to and governed by the provisions of Premier Tech Aqua
9/10
Page 233 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Notice of New Property Owner Send a copy to Premier Tech Aqua. Name of previous the owner:_________________________________________
I, the undersigned,___________________________________ hereby declare that I have acquired the property located at
Civic Number Street City Province or State
ZIP or Postal Code
()_________________________________________________________ Phone number
I have read and I understand the Warranty provided by Premier Tech Technologies Ltd for the Ecoflo ® Biofilter. I wish to benefit from this Warranty for the remaining period, if any, and from the date of the transfer of ownership, that is,_____________________________. I accept to be bound by this Warranty and by any and all of the sections, undertakings and conditions set forth therein. I have had the opportunity to examine the Ecoflo ® Biofilter and declare myself satisfied with it at the time of this transfer. I ask Premier Tech Technologies Ltd. to take note of this transfer of ownership.
Signature:
Date:
Name of new owner: _____________________________________ (block letters) Language preference: English French
New owner’s e-mail address:
Premier Tech Aqua
10/10
Page 234 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Ecoflo® Biofilter – Owner’s Manual – CAN/USA Edition: 2017-04-27
• After-sales service 7 days a week • Customer service from Monday to Friday,
8 A.M. to 5 P.M. • Technical support for the whole treatment chain (septic
tank, pump, control panel, treatment system, etc.) • Access to wastewater treatment professionals –
wastewater is our specialty! • Access to a network of local partners for service
and emergency calls • Access to a network of authorized and certified
installers
Annual Inspection Program validating your warranty
Annual lnspection
It is recommended that the owner of an advanced treatment system (or unit) have a valid annual maintenance contract with a qualified service provider duly trained by the system manufacturer or its representative. This annual inspection ensures the proper functioning of the system, the validity of its warranty and the respect of all regulatory norms in effect.
Septic System
Please complete the Registration Form in your Owner’s Manual to make sure a WALTER Service Professional will perform the 15-point yearly inspection on your Ecoflo biofilter. This inspection includes the following steps: • Inspection of the tipping bucket, distribution plates
and all other internal components • Inspection of the inner surfaces • Scarification of the filtering media on its whole surface
Protect your investment
• Verifation of the proper discharge of the treated water
Your Ecoflo septic system is a very important investment – for your property and the environment. Because it is underground and usually away from the main entrance of the residence, it is often forgotten. However, a well-planned preventive follow-up will ensure optimal treatment performances for years to come. ®
• Photographs (filtering media and discharge area)
A network of qualified professionals
Thanks to the 15-point inspection performed by one of our qualified service partners every year, your Ecoflo will offer exceptional performances and continue to protect your environment for years to come. For real peace of mind!
Advantages of joining the Annual Inspection Program • Annual maintenance service contract is automatically
renewed upon reception of payment • Copy of the contract to be provided to
the municipality is sent to the homeowner (upon request) • No charges to transfer contract to a new owner
ecoflobiofilter.com | 1 800 632-6356
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Premier Tech Aqua (PTA) is committed to helping you protect that investment. This is why we developed a network of qualified professionals who offer an outstanding preventive service. With PTA’s network of local partners – now known as WALTER – you will benefit from an unparalleled technical support and true peace of mind.
®
2015
Page 235 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Throughout the year
Page 236 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
1
Before the visit • WALTER professionals receive an extensive
training that certifies they master the strict inspection procedures required
Annual inspection visit *
2
The annual visit is carried out between April and November by a WALTER professional who performs a 15-point inspection on the Ecoflo filtering media and internal components. The homeowners do not need to be present since a proof of maintenance is left on the door handle to inform them.
• PTA proceeds to the maintenance service contract
®
renewal from its clients • The homeowner makes the required payment
in order to renew his/her service contract • The homeowner makes sure that all his/her septic system
lids are free of any obstacles and accessible at all times for the professional who will carry out the inspection between April and November
4
Peace of mind for the homeowner
Thanks to the inspection visit, the homeowner knows the condition of his/her Ecoflo septic system year after year. ®
• Maintenance reports are provided within 48 hours
upon request • Treatment performances are validated, which protects
property value • Technical support is provided by professionals • Simple and accessible files make real estate
transactions easier when property is sold • Follow-up is approved by most governmental authorities
Protect your
investment with
After the visit The WALTER professional provides PTA with all the information collected at the inspection visit.
3
• Information is entered in a high-performance data
management system specially designed for septic installations • Pictures taken onsite are downloaded • Data are sent to PTA’s main server to be analyzed
and archived
AGENDA ITEM #b)
• Data are analyzed by wastewater treatment specialists
- It is recommended that the owner of an advanced treatment system (or unit) have a valid annual maintenance contract with a qualified service provider duly trained by the system manufacturer or its representative.
AGENDA ITEM #b)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM MODELS 1260L THROUGH 3020L
INSTALLATION AND OPERATION MANUAL
Page 237 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Hydro-Kinetic® Installation and Operation Instructions Wastewater enters the pretreatment chamber to precondition the waste before it flows into the anoxic chamber. Once in the anoxic chamber, facultative anaerobes digest organic matter. Flow then enters the aeration chamber where aerobic bacteria biologically convert the waste into stable substances and oxidize ammonia into nitrite and nitrate. Following aeration, liquids flow to the clarification chamber where gravity settles out biologically active material. A recirculation pump in the clarifier transfers a portion of the wastewater back to the anoxic chamber where nitrogen compounds are converted to harmless nitrogen gas. From the clarifier, treated liquids pass through the flow equalization device and into the disposal system. Effluent passes through the Bio-Film Reactor for final treatment. The Hydro-Kinetic system is certified to BNQ Standard 3680-600 Class B-IV, D-I, N-I and BNQ Standard 3680-910 Class III, averaging effluent quality of 3.0 mg/L CBOD, 2.0 mg/L TSS, 67% Nitrogen removal and 2,200 CFU/100 ml fecal coliform. The Hydro-Kinetic system with Phos-4-Fade filter is certified to BNQ Standard 3680-600 Class B-IV, D-I, N-I, P-II and BNQ Standard 3680-910 Class IV, averaging effluent quality of 3.0 mg/L CBOD, 2.0 mg/L TSS, 67% Nitrogen removal, 0.14 mg/L Total Phosphorus and 2,200 CFU/100 ml fecal coliform. The Hydro-Kinetic system with UV disinfection is certified to BNQ Standard 3680-600 Class B-IV, D-III, N-I and BNQ Standard 3680-910 Class V, averaging effluent quality of 3.0 mg/L CBOD, 2.0 mg/L TSS, 67% Nitrogen removal and 2 CFU/100 ml fecal coliform. The Hydro-Kinetic system with Phos-4-Fade filter and UV disinfection is certified to BNQ Standard 3680-600 Class B-IV, D-III, N-I, P-II and BNQ Standard 3680-910 Class IV & V, averaging effluent quality of 3.0 mg/L CBOD, 2.0 mg/L TSS, 67% Nitrogen removal, 0.14 mg/L Total Phosphorus and 2 CFU/100 ml fecal coliform.
Before You Start Installation procedures, equipment and personnel should always comply with applicable safety regulations as well as all federal, state and local codes. The Hydro-Kinetic system must be installed by an authorized representative of Norweco according to these instructions to insure safe, reliable and efficient operation. Carefully unpack and inspect the system components. Make sure you have received all components in good condition. Read all instructions before beginning installation. The Hydro-Kinetic system components include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Service Pro Model 801P Control Center Model A100/A150 Air Pump (with power wire junction box) Alarm Float (with alarm wire junction box) Flow Equalization Device Primary Recirculation Assembly Model SD102/SD103 Recirculation Pump
Intermediate Recirculation Assembly Diffuser Mixing Bar Mixing Bar Drop Pipe Assembly Diffuser Drop Pipe Assembly Primary Air Assembly
SERVICE PRO MODEL 801P CONTROL CENTER
AIR PUMP
ALARM FLOAT A5
PRIMARY AIR ASSEMBLY (Subassembly A5)
DIFFUSER DROP PIPE ASSEMBLY
(Subassemblies A2-A4)
S10 PRETREATMENT CHAMBER
S1
S2
S6
AERATION CHAMBER
S9
A3
CLARIFICATION CHAMBER
S5
S8 A2
(Subassemblies S8-S10)
- FLOW EQUALIZATION DEVICE
- PRIMARY RECIRCULATION ASSEMBLY
(Subassemblies S4-S6) S7
(Subassembly S7)
S4
S3
ANOXIC CHAMBER
MIXING BAR DROP PIPE ASSEMBLY
MIXING BAR
A4
- DIFFUSER
(Subassembly A1)
A1
- INTERMEDIATE RECIRCULATION ASSEMBLY (Subassemblies S1-S3)
FIGURE 1 Page 1
Page 238 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
- RECIRCULATION PUMP
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Pre-Delivery Tank Preparation The Hydro-Kinetic tank equipment package contains some components that are cast-in the tank during the manufacturing process, and other components that are installed after the casting process is complete. In the standard two-piece tank, the only component that needs to be installed prior to delivery is the intermediate recirculation assembly. In a one-piece tank, the distributor will need to provide a pretreatment outlet tee, an aeration chamber inlet elbow and a Bio-Film Reactor outlet tee. Norweco recommends assembling all of these components, as well as the Bio-Film Reactor elements, before the tank is delivered to the installation site. Install components according to the following steps: 1.
For a one-piece tank, solvent weld the 4" Schedule 40 PVC pretreatment outlet tee to the coupling that was cast-in the outlet of the pretreatment chamber (distributor to provide). Solvent weld the 4" Schedule 40 PVC aeration chamber transfer elbow into the coupling cast-in the inlet of the aeration chamber (distributor to provide).
For all systems, begin in the anoxic chamber and solvent weld subassembly S1 into the coupling that was cast-in the wall between the anoxic and aeration chambers. The elbow should be oriented as shown in Figure 2, with the short stub of pipe parallel to the floor and ceiling of the tank.
Solvent weld subassembly S2 into the aeration chamber side of the same cast-in coupling. See Figure 2.
Starting in the aeration chamber, pass subassembly S3 through the wall into the clarification chamber. Solvent weld the coupling on subassembly S2 to subassembly S3. See Figure 2.
Place the Bio-Film Reactor elements into the Bio-Film Reactor tank. They will rest on the support rib cast into the outlet chamber. The Bio-Film Reactor elements should be installed with the media service hatch oriented toward the middle of the tank and facing up. See Figure 3.
Using the universal tool, rotate the two slide locks on each Bio-Film Reactor element so that they lock into the recesses cast into the tank.
OUTLET
INLET
S1
S2 AERATION CHAMBER
ANOXIC CHAMBER
BIO-FILM REACTOR ELEMENTS
S3 CLARIFICATION CHAMBER
ROTATE SLIDE LOCKS BIO-FILM REACTOR TANK
CAST-IN COUPLING
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 2 Tank Delivery and Setting 1.
When installing a Hydro-Kinetic system, first check the length, width and depth of the excavation. Insure the excavation is long enough to allow at least 2’ between the treatment tank and the Bio-Film Reactor for installation of the interconnect plumbing and backfill between the tanks. Cut a 4" Schedule 40 PVC pipe (distributor to provide) 6" longer than the distance between the tanks for the interconnect plumbing. Insert the interconnect pipe into the inlet of the Bio-Film Reactor tank prior to tank placement. This allows the interconnect pipe to be backed straight out, and solvent welded into the cast-in outlet coupling of the clarification chamber when the tank is set. The excavation should have sufficient overdig to allow for a minimum of 6" clearance around the entire perimeter of the system. Additional overdig will be required on deep installations or where unstable soil conditions exist. Safe working conditions must be established and maintained during the entire installation procedure.
Prepare the excavation to the appropriate depth based on the elevation of the building sewer line. Concrete systems should have a maximum burial depth of 42" below grade. HDPE systems should have a maximum burial depth of 36½" below grade. Allow ⅛" of fall per foot from the building to the system. Fall through the system is 5" from inlet invert to outlet invert. Therefore, the outlet line from the system must be installed 5" lower than the inlet sewer line. The bottom of the excavation must be level and smooth. A 4" layer of gravel, sand or fine crushed stone should be installed and leveled to within ¼" from side to side and end to end. Page 2
Page 239 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Using extreme caution, place the treatment tank into the excavation. Place the Bio-Film Reactor in the excavation allowing at least 2’ between the treatment tank and the Bio-Film Reactor tank. Insure tanks are installed square and level.
Connect the building sewer line to the pretreatment chamber inlet. The inlet line must be laid continuously and unspliced from the tank to undisturbed earth beyond the limits of the tank excavation.
Back the interconnect pipe out of the Bio-Film Reactor tank and solvent weld the pipe to the outlet coupling of the clarification chamber. Then, connect the discharge sewer line to the Bio-Film Reactor tank outlet continuously and unspliced from the tank to undisturbed earth beyond the limits of the tank excavation. If using a one-piece tank, insert discharge sewer line through tank outlet seal, leaving 4" to 6" protruding inside the tank. Solvent weld the 4" Schedule 40 PVC outlet tee (distributor to provide) to the discharge sewer line.
Install risers as required to bring the access covers to grade.
Plant Wiring and Control Center Installation 1.
Electrical work must be performed in accordance with the latest edition of the National Electrical Code as well as applicable local codes.
All electrical service cable used with the Hydro-Kinetic system must be UL and CSA approved, type UF, #14/2 AWG minimum and must have a full-size center ground. Larger cable is required if the length of the underground service is greater than 80 feet. Consult your electrician for details.
An approved cable must be installed from the air pump to the junction box provided for connection to the control center. If installing the air pump in a location other than the aeration chamber riser, insure the air line is no more than 75’ in length and the air pump is protected from the elements in a clean, dry, well-ventilated area and proceed to step 6.
Inspect the power cable entrance in the side of the aeration riser. Remove any sharp edges or flash. Insert the free end of the power cable through a pre-formed ½" conduit ell (2’ by 1’), then into the power cable entrance of the aeration riser. Guide the power cable into the riser. Pull enough cable through the riser to reach 36" above the riser top. Coil and secure the cable in the aeration riser so that it will not hang down into the tank.
Lay the conduit ell with cable directly across the top and down the tank side. Do not allow the power cable to be laid across the end of the tank or any removable access cover. Seal the connection between the conduit and the aeration riser with mortar or approved sealant.
A second underground cable must be installed unspliced from the Service Pro control center into the clarification chamber riser to supply power to the recirculation pump.
Inspect the power cable entrance in the side of the concrete clarification riser. Remove any sharp edges or flash. Insert the free end of the power cable through a pre-formed ½" conduit ell (2’ by 1’), then into the power cable entrance of the clarification riser. Guide the power cable into the riser. Pull enough cable through the riser to reach 36" above the riser top. Coil and secure the cable in the clarification riser so that it will not hang down into the tank.
Lay the conduit ell with cable directly across the top and down the tank side. Do not allow the power cable to be laid across the end of the tank or any removable access cover. Seal the connection between the conduit and the clarification riser with mortar or approved sealant.
Two alarm leads must be installed from the air pump pressure switch to the Service Pro control center. The alarm leads should be #16 AWG minimum and installed in conduit where contact with concrete may occur. IMPORTANT: Alarm leads and power leads must always be installed in separate conduits.
- Two alarm leads must be installed from the high water float switch to the Service Pro control center. The alarm leads should be #16 AWG minimum and installed in conduit where contact with concrete may occur. IMPORTANT: Alarm leads and power leads must always be installed in separate conduits. If the air pump will be installed in the aeration riser, the high water and air pump alarm leads should be installed in the same conduit. Properly seal the conduit opening in the riser with mortar or approved sealant.
Check the excavation and sewer line trenches to be sure they are free of debris, rocks and any sharp or abrasive objects that could damage electrical cables or alarm leads during backfill or settling.
Page 3
Page 240 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
- Uncoil the electrical service cables and alarm leads into the excavation and influent sewer line trench. Leave sufficient slack in the cables so they will not be stressed or pulled tight during backfill or settling.
- Always encase the electrical cables and alarm leads in conduit any time they are above finished grade. Route the conduits and cables as directly as possible to the control center mounting location.
Required Prior to Backfilling 1.
For installations where the air pump will not be located in the aeration riser, install a ¾" Schedule 40 PVC air line from the air pump to the system. The air line should be buried in a trench at a recommended depth of at least 12 inches. Protect the air line in a casing pipe if heavy loading is anticipated. The air line must be run into the aeration riser and the opening in the riser sealed with mortar or approved sealant.
On the Bio-Film Reactor elements, use the universal tool to insure each of the slide locks are rotated until they are in the furthest extension point possible.
Backfilling 1.
The system should be backfilled immediately after sewer lines and underground electrical cables are installed. Fine, loose earth should be used to backfill the tank excavation and sewer line trenches. Be sure it is completely free of rocks, large clumps of earth and construction debris. Use fine granular material when backfilling around electrical cables and conduits. The underground electrical cables should have at least 2’ of earth cover. If the proposed finished grade will not permit this coverage, the cables should be installed in approved conduit from the tank to the building foundation. Backfill evenly around the entire perimeter of the tank rather than all at once on each side. Take care to completely fill in the cavity beneath the slanted clarifier end wall.
Final grading should be 6" below the top of each access cover and should slope away from the tank so surface runoff will drain away from the treatment system. Use extreme care in backfilling. Do not allow dirt or mud to enter any part of the treatment system or sewer lines. If dirt or mud enters any portion of the system, it must be removed to insure proper system operation. Removing the dirt or mud may require repeated flushing and tank pumping.
Immediately after backfilling, fill each chamber of the treatment system with water to the outlet invert. The water must be free of leaves, mud, grit or any other materials that might interfere with system operation.
PRETREATMENT CHAMBER ANOXIC CHAMBER
A4
Air Pump and Piping Installation 1.
AERATION CHAMBER
Remove all packaging from the plumbing assemblies labeled “AIR”. Attach diffuser bar A1 to subassembly A2 at union as shown in Figure 4. Securely tighten union by hand. Solvent weld subassembly A2 to subassembly A3 as shown in Figure 4. Insure red arrows are aligned.
Solvent weld subassembly A3 to subassembly A4 as shown in Figure 4. Insure blue arrows are aligned.
Install this entire assembly into aeration chamber by bending the flexible tubing. Lower assembly into the tank until the diffuser bar contacts both the floor and side wall of the tank as shown in Figure 4.
Remove air pump and components from carton. If the air pump will be installed in the aeration chamber riser, install a concrete support base for air pump.
Install the air pump in the aeration chamber riser on the support base (or in a clean, dry, well-ventilated area protected from the elements no more than 75’ from the tank). Attach subassembly A4 to subassembly A5 at union as shown in Figure 4. Securely tighten union by hand.
CLARIFICATION CHAMBER
A3
A2 A1
FIGURE 4
A5 AERATION CHAMBER
FIGURE 5 Page 4
Page 241 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
S3 S4
To wire the air pump female electrical connector, unscrew the three captive stainless steel screws from the face of the female connector. They will stay in the body of the receptacle. Lift out the rigid internal receptacle body. Unscrew the compression nut on the strain relief connector. Insert the electrical service cable through the compression nut, compression ring and neoprene grommet. Strip the outer insulation back 1¼" on the underground electrical service cable and expose the three individual leads. Use extreme care to be sure the insulation jackets on the individual black and white leads are not scarred or damaged while stripping the outer jacket.
Strip off the insulation jackets 7/16" from the ends of the individual black and white leads. Insert the black lead into CLARIFICATION CHAMBER the hole adjacent to the brass-colored screw and tighten the screw securely. Insert the white lead into the hole adjacent to the silver-colored screw and tighten the screw securely. Insert the bare copper ground lead into the hole that is FIGURE 6 adjacent to the green-colored screw and tighten the screw securely. Align the insert key on the receptacle body with the keyway molded into the rubber sleeve. Press the receptacle body into the sleeve and tighten the three stainless steel screws on the face of the connector. Press the grommet into the electrical connector and tighten the compression nut.
Recirculation Pump and Piping Installation In the clarification chamber: 1.
Remove all packaging from the plumbing assemblies labeled “SLUDGE”. Solvent weld subassembly S3 to subassembly S4 in the clarification chamber (S3 was installed with the Tank Equipment Package). Be sure the union is facing horizontally as shown in Figure 6.
Thread subassembly S5 into the pump discharge as shown in Figure 7.
Solvent weld the coupling on subassembly S5 to subassembly S6. See Figure 7.
Attach pump cord to pump discharge assembly (S5-S6) using cable ties provided.
Use discharge assembly to lower pump into the clarification chamber until pump rests on the floor of the hopper as shown in Figure 7. Attach subassembly S4 to subassembly S6 at union. Securely tighten union by hand.
S4
S10
S1
S2
S3
S9 ANOXIC CHAMBER
S6 AERATION CHAMBER
CLARIFICATION CLARIFICATION CHAMBER CHAMBER
S5 S5 S8
S7
FIGURE 7
In the anoxic chamber: 6.
Attach subassembly S7 to subassembly S8 at union as shown in Figure 7. Securely tighten union by hand.
Solvent weld subassembly S8 to subassembly S9 as shown in Figure 7. Insure yellow arrows are aligned.
Solvent weld subassembly S9 to subassembly S10 as shown in Figure 7. Insure green arrows are aligned.
Bend mixing bar assembly at flexible tubing and lower into anoxic chamber until mixing bar is positioned as shown in Figure 7. Attach subassembly S10 to subassembly S1 at union. Securely tighten union by hand. Page 5
Page 242 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
- Wire the recirculation pump female electrical connector. Unscrew the three captive stainless steel screws from the face of the female connector. They will stay in the body of the receptacle. Lift out the rigid internal receptacle body. Unscrew the compression nut on the strain relief connector. Insert the electrical service cable through the compression nut, compression ring and neoprene grommet. Strip the outer insulation back 1¼" on the underground electrical service cable and expose the three individual leads. Use extreme care to insure the insulation jackets on the individual black and white leads are not scarred or damaged while stripping the outer jacket.
UNIVERSAL TOOL
FLOW EQUALIZATION DEVICE RECEIVING FLANGE
Strip off the insulation jackets 7/16" from the ends of the individual black and white leads. Insert the black lead into the hole adjacent to the brass-colored screw and tighten the screw securely. Insert the white lead into the hole adjacent to the silver-colored screw and tighten the INSURE DEVICE screw securely. Insert the bare copper ground lead into the hole that IS COMPLETELY CLARIFICATION CHAMBER is adjacent to the green-colored screw and tighten the screw securely. SEATED IN FLANGE Align the insert key on the receptacle body with the keyway molded into the rubber sleeve. Press the receptacle body into the sleeve and FIGURE 8 tighten the three stainless steel screws on the face of the connector. Press the neoprene grommet into the electrical connector and tighten the compression nut.
- Plug the male connector on the recirculation pump power cord into the female connector.
- Install the flow equalization device by sliding it into the tank receiving flange in the clarification chamber as shown in Figure 8. Use the universal tool to insure the device is completely seated in the flange.
Completing the Installation 1.
The control center should be wired for operation when the tank and underground electrical cables are installed. The control center should be located so that the red warning light can be seen and the audible alarm heard. The mounting location should minimize exposure to direct sunlight, freezing rain or conditions that might prevent routine inspection or access. The control center should always be mounted out of the reach of children.
Remove the cover from the alarm wire junction box connected to the float switch. Solvent weld the junction box to the conduit containing the alarm leads, located in the aeration chamber riser.
Reference Figure 9 for all wiring instructions. The black and white alarm wires contained in the junction box are provided to connect the float switch to the control center. Connect the black wire in the junction box to either alarm lead from the panel, and secure with a wire nut connector. Connect the white wire in the junction box to the remaining alarm lead from the panel, and secure with a wire nut connector.
If the air pump is installed in the aeration chamber riser, solvent weld the conduit connection for the pressure switch alarm cable to the junction box. Connect the black wire in the pressure switch cable to either alarm lead from the panel, and secure with a wire nut connector. Connect the white wire in the pressure switch cable to the remaining alarm lead from the panel, and secure with a wire nut connector.
Reinstall and secure the cover on the alarm wire junction box. Plug any unused junction box openings.
Proceed to the control center. Detach the cover from the control center enclosure and remove the insert from the mounting posts. Set the control center insert aside. Remove the knockouts in the bottom of the enclosure and install a sealed conduit connector (distributor to provide) in each opening. Exposed wiring to or from the control center should always be encased in conduit. Mount the control center securely using masonry nails, wood screws or common nails as appropriate.
Use a dedicated 115 VAC, single-phase circuit at the main electrical service panel. A 15 amp circuit breaker is recommended (10 amp minimum). CAUTION: MAKE SURE THIS CIRCUIT IS DE-ENERGIZED. CHECK IT WITH AN ELECTRICIAN’S TEST LIGHT BEFORE PROCEEDING. REMEMBER THAT OTHER CIRCUITS IN THE SERVICE PANEL MAY REMAIN ENERGIZED AS YOU ARE WORKING. USE ONLY TOOLS WITH INSULATED HANDLES, STAND IN A DRY LOCATION AND WORK WITH EXTREME CARE.
Open the black electrical insulator on the back of the control center insert for access to power and alarm wiring connections.
Install a #14/2 AWG minimum cable with full-size center ground from the control center to the power wire junction box provided for connection to the control center. Page 6
Page 243 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Wire from the dedicated circuit breaker in the main service panel to the power wire junction box. Use at least #14 AWG black copper wire. Connect the black wire from the main service panel to the black wire in the air pump power cable and the black wire to the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector.
Wire from the neutral in the main service panel to the junction box. Use at least #14 AWG white copper wire. Connect the white wire from the main service panel to the white wire from the air pump power cable and the white wire to the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector.
Connect the ground wire from the main electrical service panel to the non-insulated ground lead from the air pump and the ground wire to the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector. IMPORTANT: Never allow the white neutral leads and the ground leads to be spliced together.
Install the cover on the junction box and proceed to the control center.
FIGURE 9 14.
Connect the black wire from the junction box to the black wire on the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector.
Connect the black lead of the underground electrical cable from the recirculation pump to the red wire on the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector.
Connect the white wire from the junction box to the white wire from the recirculation pump and white wire on the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector.
Connect the ground wire from the junction box to the non-insulated ground lead from the recirculation pump and the green wire on the control center. Secure with a wire nut connector. IMPORTANT: Never allow the white neutral leads and the ground leads to be spliced together.
An auxiliary alarm input (AUX1) is available for connection of optional equipment such as an ultraviolet disinfection system, chemical detection system or effluent pump system. Refer to the Alarm Input section in the Service Pro Model 801P Installation and Operation Instructions for details regarding the connection of auxiliary equipment.
Connect the alarm leads from the high water float switch to the AUX2 RELAY terminals on the control center.
Connect the alarm leads from the air pump pressure switch to the AUX3 RELAY terminals on the control center.
If the remote monitoring features of the control center will be utilized, run the telephone or network cable to the bottom of the control center enclosure. IMPORTANT: Never install the communication cable in a conduit with power lines.
Place the communication cable in the electrical grommet provided. The grommet snaps into the control center enclosure. Crimp the appropriate phone or network connector on the end of the communication cable. Plug the connector into the jack on the control center insert. Connect the other end to the telephone or network system. Page 7
Page 244 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Carefully form all wiring neatly into the lower part of the control center. Do not allow the wires to make contact with other electrical components in the control center. The conduit openings in the enclosure must now be sealed using expanding foam sealant (available from Norweco).
Close the black electrical insulator and snap the control center insert into position. Reinstall and close the control center cover. Secure it with the Norweco tamper evident seal.
Clearly label the dedicated circuit used for the Hydro-Kinetic system on the door of the main service panel. Replace the service panel deadfront and enclosure cover.
Final Check and System Startup 1.
Place the dedicated circuit breaker for the Hydro-Kinetic system in the main service panel in the “on” position.
To commission the telemetry system, first insure the phone/network cable is properly installed. Place the control center power switch in the “off” position. While holding in the reset button, place the power switch in the “on” position. Continue to hold the reset button for 5 seconds. Release the reset button and allow the telemetry system up to 60 seconds to call out and complete the commissioning process. The phone/network light will illuminate during the call out process. If commissioning is successful, the alarm light will flash 5 short flashes and stop as verification. If commissioning is unsuccessful, refer to the Service Pro Model 801P Installation and Operation Instructions.
If no telemetry system is installed, press and hold the RESET button on the control center for 5 seconds. The audible alarm should sound and the alarm light should illuminate.
The system is operational once all installation and startup steps have been completed to this point. It will take 2 to 6 weeks for the system to reach biological maturity, depending upon system loading. DANGER: Make sure the system access covers are in good condition and securely installed on the mounting castings. Never allow access risers to be left uncovered or partially covered. Failure to secure access covers and safety nets could result in bodily injury, illness or death. Riser safety nets are available from Norweco for concrete or plastic risers.
Routine Maintenance The following should be performed every 12 months (or as required by your local governing regulations) by a qualified service technician: 1.
If applicable, inspect the effluent discharge point to make sure there are no restrictions to the effluent flow. If restrictions are present, perform service as needed.
If effluent sampling is required, it is recommended that a proper sampling port be installed downstream of the system.
Inspect the vent cap, perimeter vent and air pump for objects, plants, insects or debris that could impede the air intake. Remove these items if present.
Check the air pump for proper operation. Check the air filter and clean or replace as required. Check the aeration chamber for odor. A musty odor indicates the presence of aerobic conditions essential for proper treatment. A septic odor indicates inadequate aeration, suggesting that the delivery of air into the aeration chamber has been restricted.
Check the aeration chamber and insure the diffuser assembly is creating a rolling motion of the chamber contents. If a rolling motion is not visible, verify air pump operation. Remove and clean diffuser assembly if necessary.
Check the anoxic chamber and insure the mixing bar is operational. The recirculation pump operates on a pre-programmed on/off cycle, so press the reset button if necessary to verify operation.
Inspect the flow equalization device. Rinse the design flow, sustained flow and peak flow ports with a garden hose and insure they are free of debris. Clean the flow ports with a brush if necessary.
Use the hopper scraping tool to gently scrape all surfaces of the clarification chamber hopper.
The settled solids should be pumped from the Bio-Film Reactor tank to the pretreatment chamber. With the flow equalization device securely in place, install the outlet blocking tool into the clarifier outlet coupling prior to pumping. Place the intake of the service pump at the bottom of the influent chamber. Pump the contents from the bottom of the Bio-Film Reactor tank until the accumulated solids are withdrawn and the water level is below the bottom of the Bio-Film Reactor elements. Approximately 150 gallons will be removed during service. Rinse the media with a hose during tank pumping. After pumping, remove the outlet blocking tool and allow the Bio-Film Reactor tank to refill to normal operating level. Never leave the Bio-Film Reactor tank empty after pumping. Page 8
Page 245 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
- Inspect the system to determine if complete pumping may be required. See “System Pumping” section of this document.
Upon completion of the inspection, insure that all access covers are properly reinstalled. Any missing or damaged access covers should be immediately replaced. DANGER: Make sure the system access covers are in good condition and securely installed on the mounting castings. Never allow access risers to be left uncovered or partially covered. Failure to secure access covers and safety nets could result in bodily injury, illness or death. Riser safety nets are available from Norweco for concrete or plastic risers.
- Approved replacement parts are available from the authorized system dealer listed on the control center cover.
System Pumping 1.
The Hydro-Kinetic system is a biological treatment device and will not require pumping as often as a septic tank. Pumping of the system will likely be required at 3 to 5 year intervals depending upon system usage, loading and treatment requirements. If pumping is required more frequently than every 2 years, there is an operational problem with the system and it should be evaluated in greater detail.
If the service technician suspects that the system may require pumping, a settleable solids test should be performed on a sample from the aeration chamber. The air pump must be removed from the aeration chamber riser to perform this test.
Immediately after removing air pump, dip a graduated cone or other clear container into the aeration chamber to a depth of 2½ feet. Set the container on a level surface and then allow the solids to settle for 30 minutes while you complete the service inspection. Do not disturb the container during the test.
After 30 minutes, read the level of solids and compare it with the total liquid volume in the container. Calculate the percentage of settled solids volume (i.e. ½ full of solids equals 50%). If the settled material contains large pockets of clear liquid, estimate the volume of these pockets and reduce the settled solids reading by that amount. A settled solids reading of up to 80% indicates no adjustments are necessary. A settled solids level greater than 80% in the aeration chamber indicates excessive solids and that the system should be pumped.
If it is determined that pumping is required, contact a tank pumping service licensed by the local regulatory agency. The septage or biosolids from the system must be removed and disposed of in a manner consistent with federal, state and local regulations. Advise the pumping service that they will be pumping approximately 1,500 gallons.
Turn off the air pump and recirculation pump before tank pumping.
Remove the access cover from the aeration and clarification chambers. Unplug the air pump and disassemble the union located on the primary air connection. Remove the air pump, primary air connection and support base from the aeration riser. Use the universal tool to bend flexible diffuser tubing and remove the diffuser drop pipe assembly. Connect the suction hose to the pump being used to evacuate the chamber.
Activate the pump and remove the aeration chamber contents. Pump the aeration chamber from the top down, to remove biologically inactive material. Feed the hose down as the liquid is being evacuated from the aeration chamber. It is not necessary to wash down the sidewalls or tank bottom. Pump only 75% of the volume out of the aeration chamber to facilitate plant re-start. Replace the diffuser drop pipe assembly. Reinstall the support base, primary air connection and air pump. Reassemble the union in the primary air connection and plug in the air pump. Replace the access cover.
The Bio-Film Reactor tank should be pumped after the aeration chamber. Remove the Bio-Film Reactor tank access cover. Lower the hose into the influent chamber until it contacts the bottom of the tank. Withdraw the hose approximately 2 inches. Completely pump 100% of the contents from the chamber and rinse the media with a hose during tank pumping. Replace the Bio-Film Reactor tank access cover.
- Next, pump the anoxic chamber. Remove the anoxic chamber access cover. Use the universal tool to bend flexible mixing bar tubing and remove the mixing bar drop pipe to allow access for the suction hose. Lower the hose until it contacts the bottom of the tank. Withdraw the hose approximately 2 inches. Completely pump 100% of the contents from the chamber. Reinstall the mixing bar drop pipe assembly and replace the access cover.
The final chamber to pump is the pretreatment chamber. Remove the pretreatment chamber access cover. Break up the scum mat to facilitate pumping. Lower the hose until it contacts the bottom of the tank. Withdraw the hose approximately 2 inches. Activate the pump and remove 100% of the chamber contents. It is not necessary to wash down the sidewalls or tank bottom. If solids are so concentrated that the suction hose cannot withdraw them, tank contents may be backflushed to break up the solid matter. Replace the pretreatment chamber access cover.
- After pumping, refill all chambers to capacity with clean water. Return all plumbing and equipment to its properly installed location. Replace any access covers that were removed. Turn on power to the air pump and the recirculation Page 9
Page 246 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
pump. Check for proper operation of all equipment. DANGER: Make sure the system access covers are in good condition and securely installed on the mounting castings. Never allow access risers to be left uncovered or partially covered. Failure to secure access covers and safety nets could result in bodily injury, illness or death. Riser safety nets are available from Norweco for concrete or plastic risers.
Troubleshooting This troubleshooting section provides solutions to the most common problems encountered in the operation of the system.
Control Center Alarming 1.
Liquid in tank at level of high water alarm float: system is flooded due to an obstruction in the flow equalization device, outlet, effluent line or disposal field. Determine cause and remove obstruction, or make repairs as required. Be sure to check effluent disposal system for proper operation.
No rolling action in aeration chamber: • Air pump is pumping air but there is an obstruction in the line between the air pump and diffuser: disassemble air line and remove obstruction. • Diffuser is plugged: remove and clean diffuser. • Air pump is not running: check power supply to air pump. • Air is escaping through a leak in the plumbing assembly between air pump and diffuser: identify and repair air leak. If necessary, remove the diffuser, diffuser drop pipe assembly, and primary air assembly from the aeration chamber and use a soapy water solution to thoroughly coat the plumbing and check for bubbles. Repair any leaking air pipe or fitting and retest.
Air pump is running but does not pump air: clean or replace air filter. Internal components are worn and the air pump is failing. Rebuild or replace the air pump. Contact the authorized Norweco representative for replacement components.
No mixing action in anoxic chamber: • Recirculation pump is operating but there is an obstruction in the line between the recirculation pump and mixing bar: disassemble mixing bar plumbing and remove obstruction. • Recirculation pump is not operating. Pump needs replaced. Contact the authorized Norweco representative for replacement components. • Mixing bar is plugged: remove and clean mixing bar. • Check valve is stuck in closed position: repair or replace check valve.
Septic Odor from System 1.
No power to air pump: check air pump for proper operation. Insure the breaker is in the “on” position, the air pump is plugged in and power is present (check with test light from Tool Kaddy)
Insufficient air delivery to aeration chamber: see “Control Center Alarming”
Incomplete treatment due to hydraulic overloading: see “Hydraulic Overloading of System”
Water softener backwash discharging into system: notify owner to remove backwash line from system
Excessive solids in aeration chamber: evaluate chamber and pump if necessary
Excessive solids in anoxic chamber: evaluate chamber and pump if necessary
Hydraulic Overloading of System 1.
Ground water entering tank through defective inlet or outlet seal: excavate and repair seal
Ground water entering system through crack in tank: excavate and repair crack with hydraulic cement
Ground water entering system through joint between riser and tank: excavate and reseal joint with non-shrink grout or mastic
Roofing down spouts, footer drains or floor drains tied into system: notify owner to relocate connection downstream of system
Check valve is stuck in closed position: repair or replace check valve Page 10
Page 247 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Sampling Proper sampling techniques are important to ensure that the results are representative of system performance. To ensure an accurate sample is collected, Norweco recommends that a sample port be installed immediately downstream of the treatment system. The sample ports should allow a free falling sample to be collected. Sample ports should be cleaned before attempting to collect a sample. If a sample port has not been provided, effluent from the Bio-Film Reactor should be evaluated by collecting a sample from the liquid above the Reactor Elements. The sample should be collected from 2-3" below the liquid surface to avoid collection of any floating solids that could interfere with results. If a sample port has not been provided, effluent from the Phos-4-Fade filter should be evaluated by collecting a sample from the liquid above the Phos-4-Fade media. The sample should be collected from 2-3" below the liquid surface to avoid collection of any floating solids that could interfere with results. Samples of the UV system effluent must be collected from a sample port installed downstream of the UV disinfection system. If an influent sample is required, the influent sample should be collected from the pretreatment chamber.
PROGRESS THROUGH
SERVICE SINCE 1906 ©MMXVIII NORWECO, INC. NORWALK, OHIO U.S.A / REV. 06/2018.
Page 11
Page 248 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Page 249 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Homeowner Manual Waterloo Biofilter® Residential Wastewater Treatment System For Additional Information, Please Contact:
Waterloo Baskets Model: AD-BAXX Waterloo Biofilter Systems Inc. 143 Dennis Street, PO Box 400 Rockwood ON N0B 2K0 T: 519-856-0757 F: 519-856-0759 www.waterloo-biofilter.com
This product is certified to CAN/BNQ 3680-600 Class B-IV and respects the requirements thereof. Serial No.: BI-XXXXXX Capacity: X,XXX litres per day
© Waterloo Biofilter Systems 2018
12 of 12
© Waterloo Biofilter Systems 2018 1 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Waterloo Biofilter Systems Inc. 143 Dennis Street, PO Box 400 Rockwood ON N0B 2K0 T: 519-856-0757 F: 519-856-0759 www.waterloo-biofilter.com
Page 250 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
There are pipes and electrical wires buried near your system. Please contact your installer or maintenance provider before attempting any excavation in the area surrounding your system. Failure to do so may result in damage and could cause serious electrical shock!
DANGER! Waterloo Biofilter®
DO NOT attempt to service any component of the
DANGER! Waterloo Biofilter® system yourself and DO NOT enter any of the tanks associated with your system! You risk serious injury or death by doing so! Your Waterloo Biofilter leaching bed is designed and constructed for your unique site. Please contact your installer or maintenance provider before carrying out any landscaping or re-grading in the area surrounding your system. Please ensure that there is easy access at all times to the lids of your anaerobic digester and treatment unit tanks. This will facilitate system inspection and maintenance.
DIRECTORS, OR AGENTS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT LOSSES, COSTS, OR DAMAGES THAT EXCEED THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE PRODUCT. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, SO THE ABOVE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION MAY NOT APPLY TO THE PURCHASER. Governing Law and Attornment This Limited Warranty is governed by and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein. Waterloo Biofilter and the owner hereby attorns to the jurisdiction of the courts of Wellington County in the Province of Ontario with respect to any dispute arising under this Limited Warranty. This Limited Warranty gives you certain specific legal rights, and you may also have other rights which vary from state to state or province to province.
2 of 12
11 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Your Waterloo Biofilter® sewage treatment system is a biological system and its proper function is dependent on the characteristics of your wastewater. DO NOT pour anything down your drains/toilets/sinks that will not biodegrade or that will harm bacterial populations. Keep the following out of your system to ensure the best system performance: • water softener backwash • cigarette butts • paper towels • sump pump discharge • condoms • paints; solvents • garburator discharge • strong acids & bases • coffee grounds • pesticides • diapers & wipes • industrial cleaners • tea tree oil • toilet bleach pucks • disinfectants • prescription drugs • feminine hygiene • cooking oil & grease products • detergent with bleach • medicated shampoo • antibacterial products
Page 251 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Filter Medium Biodegradation For the purposes of this Limited Warranty, biodegradation is defined as the decomposition of the filter medium by the action of microorganisms such as bacteria that are naturally present in sewage. Damage to the foam filter media caused by means other than biodegradation as defined above is excluded from this Limited Warranty.
Making a Claim If the product is defective you should immediately notify the system installer or maintenance provider. If it is found that the problem is caused by a manufacturing defect notify Waterloo Biofilter immediately and an inspection in regards to the warranty claim will be performed by us or our authorized representative.
Causes of damage excluded under this Limited Warranty include but are not limited to: paints, harsh cleaners or chemicals, water softener backwash, solvents, strong acids, strong bases, insects, animals, excessive flow rates and ultraviolet light.
Access to the property and all system components must be granted for inspection purposes. If it is found through this inspection that the product is performing in accordance to the specifications herein, or that the problem is not a result of manufacturer’s defect, a charge of $100 plus direct expenses will be invoiced to the owner. If it is found that the product is not performing as specified herein no charge will be applied. Limitation of Liability This Limited Warranty is the only warranty given by Waterloo Biofilter. No one is authorized to make other warranties on Waterloo Biofilter’s behalf. IN NO EVENT WILL WATERLOO BIOFILTER, OR ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, OR AGENTS, BE LIABLE TO THE PURCHASER OR ANY THIRD PARTY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, IN TORT, OR ON ANY OTHER BASIS, FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL LOSS, COST, OR DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE, MAINTENANCE, USE, OR INABILITY TO USE THE PRODUCT, EVEN IF WATERLOO BIOFILTER, OR ITS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, OR AGENTS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS OR DAMAGES, OR IF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, OR DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE. IN NO EVENT WILL WATERLOO BIOFILTER, OR ITS OFFICERS,
10 of 12
Your Waterloo Biofilter is an attached growth biological trickling filter designed for residential wastewater only. Sewage is pre-treated by an anaerobic digester then distributed over the Waterloo Biofilter filter medium. The wastewater is absorbed into the medium where it is oxidized and degraded by naturally occurring bacteria. Treated Biofilter effluent is recirculated back to the anaerobic digester for additional treatment and discharged to a leaching bed where it is dispersed into the ground.
Schematic overview of the Waterloo Basket configuration
•
Control Panel - located in your yard against your house to control the effluent pumps. DO NOT attempt to access the control panel yourself.
•
Anaerobic Digester - provides digestion and settling of solids. The tank must be pumped when sludge occupies 1/3 of the total volume. Keep tank risers accessible for pumping and maintenance.
•
Pump Tank - houses an effluent pump and float controls to dose the Biofilter. Keep pump tank riser accessible for maintenance.
•
Biofilter Treatment Unit - houses the Biofilter Baskets for aerobic treatment and an effluent pump and float controls for recirculation and dispersal. Keep Biofilter tank lid accessible for maintenance.
•
Leaching Bed - disperses treated water into the ground. DO NOT drive heavy vehicles over the leaching bed. 3 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Transfer of Ownership If there is a change in ownership of the property where the product is installed, this Limited Warranty may be transferred once under the terms and conditions of this Limited Warranty to the new property owner, provided that: • Waterloo Biofilter is notified of the transfer of ownership in writing within 90 days of the closing of the property sale, AND • the new owner’s complete name, mailing address and valid phone number is provided in said notification, AND • the new owner accepts the terms and conditions set out in this Limited Warranty The effective date of warranty coverage will remain the date of shipment of the original purchase by the original property owner or their agent. If the new property owner fails to provide Waterloo Biofilter with a written notification as stated above this Limited Warranty shall be considered null and void. This Limited Warranty cannot be transferred again.
How Your Waterloo Biofilter® System Works
Page 252 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
In the Event of an Alarm Your control panel is equipped with audible and visual alarms. When the alarm goes off you will hear a loud buzzer sound and the red light on top of the control panel will turn on. It is unlikely for an alarm to go off when no one is home because the system only operates when water is being used. Why is the Alarm Going Off? The alarm indicates that the water level in either the pump tank or Basket Biofilter tank is too high.
What Should You Do? You should call your maintenance provider immediately. Limit water use until the problem has been corrected. How Do I Silence the Alarm? Flip the black switch labeled ‘SILENCE/TEST’ located on the side of your control panel. Remember that this does NOT mean the problem has been solved. When contacting your maintenance provider please mention the specifications appearing on your Biofilter’s nameplate to facilitate quick service.
Indicators of Problems The key to high treatment levels and problem-free operation is a healthy bacterial population in your anaerobic digester. It is the homeowner’s responsibility to respect the laws and regulations in terms of effluent quality discharged to the environment from this certified product. Remember that what you put into the system affects what comes out. Anything that degrades slowly or is harmful to bacteria should not be put into your system.
•
Sewage odour around the system; however, odour coming from the vent pipe on the roof is normal and can down-draft into windows etc.
•
Standing water around the leaching bed
•
Subsiding or very wet soil in the leaching bed
•
Very slow draining or backstopped toilets or fixtures 4 of 12
Warranty Exclusions This Limited Warranty does NOT apply;
- if any portion of the product invoice issued by Waterloo Biofilter is outstanding, even if the product owner has paid in full their purchaser, installer, or agent for said product
- to any component not supplied by Waterloo Biofilter including, but not limited to, anaerobic digester(s), pump tank(s), other concrete tanks(s), electrical wiring, plumbing, drainage or effluent disposal system
- to any damage caused by improper transportation, handling, installation or maintenance of the product
- to any damage or problem caused by act of God
- to any damage or problem caused by the fault or act of a third party
- to any damage or problem arising from any installation, modification, correction or addition carried out, or attempted to be carried out, on the product by a person not authorized by Waterloo Biofilter
- to any damage or problem caused by the fault or action of the owner, or the owner’s successors, including but not limited to refusing system access for maintenance, tampering with the system, altering control panel settings, or any other attempt to repair, maintain, access or inspect the Waterloo Biofilter system
- to any damage or problem if it is demonstrated that the Waterloo Biofilter treatment unit was used outside of
its designed use or rated flow capacity, or was not used and maintained in compliance with the terms and conditions outlined in the Owner’s Manual 9. to any damage or problems resulting from heavy machinery or vehicles parked on or driven over the product 10. to any damage or problem caused by excavation, demolition, landscaping, snow removal, re-grading or construction to the product installation area 11. to any damage or problem resulting from errors in design specifications provided by the purchaser or its agents 12. to cosmetic damage such as scratches, scrapes, minor dents, or fading of stains, sealants or colourings. Particular Exclusions Maintenance Requirements Under the Ontario Building Code all advanced wastewater treatment units are required by law to be serviced and maintained by an authorized maintenance provider. Failure by the system owner to maintain a current maintenance agreement with such a maintenance provider authorized by Waterloo Biofilter will void this Limited Warranty, and Waterloo Biofilter shall be considered completely discharged from all obligations under this Limited Warranty. Annual and complete maintenance records must be presented to Waterloo Biofilter upon request. Failure to present annual maintenance records will void this Limited Warranty. Failure by the system owner to take preventative and corrective maintenance actions recommended by the maintenance provider in a timely fashion, including but not limited to periodic pumping of the anaerobic digester, will void this Limited Warranty.
9 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
If any of these occur you should call your maintenance provider immediately.
the Warranty Period. This Limited Warranty does not cover any travel time or other labour costs. This Limited Warranty does not cover any shipping costs to or from Waterloo Biofilter’s dock, to or from the designated service provider, and to or from the installation site.
Page 253 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
LIMITED WARRANTY Residential Models: 11 to 100 inclusive This Limited Warranty is applicable to the above noted models of wastewater treatment units invoiced by Waterloo Biofilter Systems Inc. (Waterloo Biofilter) after March 1, 2009. This Limited Warranty shall only become effective upon receipt by Waterloo Biofilter of the Warranty Registration Card within 90 days of the date of product invoice issued by Waterloo Biofilter. Failure to send in the Warranty Registration Card to Waterloo Biofilter within this time frame means that Waterloo Biofilter may not be required to fulfill any of the obligations contained in this Limited Warranty.
Filter Medium Waterloo Biofilter warrants that the foam filter medium will not biodegrade, under normal and expected operating conditions, to a point where it can no longer absorb wastewater, for a period of twenty (20) years from the date of shipment from our dock.
Other Components All other components supplied by Waterloo Biofilter carry the original manufacturer’s warranty and are not covered under this Limited Warranty offered by Waterloo Biofilter. The original manufacturer’s applicable Warranty Periods are outlined below. Full copies of the original manufacturer’s product warranties are available upon request. • Effluent pumps – two (2) year limited warranty • Control panels – three (3) year limited warranty • Float switches – three (3) year limited warranty Extended Warranty Residential Models: 11 to 100 inclusive. If purchased at the time of order, the Extended Warranty increases the duration of the Warranty Period to five (5) years on electrical components including pump(s), control panel, and float tree(s). All other terms and conditions contained in the Limited Warranty apply.
Homeowners with advanced sewage treatment systems are required by law to have a maintenance contract with an authorized provider. It is the responsibility of the homeowner to keep the contract up to date. Failure to maintain a current maintenance contract with an authorized provider voids the Limited Warranty offered by Waterloo Biofilter. Preventative Maintenance Saves Money Regular maintenance ensures that the system functions properly and remains operational for a long time. Regular maintenance helps to prevent and solve problems before they become larger issues that may require costly excavation or replacements. Authorized Maintenance Providers Waterloo Biofilter is the main authorized service provider for systems in Ontario and will contact you to setup up the agreement. If you have not heard from Waterloo Biofilter regarding your maintenance, please call us at 1-866-366-4329 x 277 or email us at service@waterloo-biofilter.com.
Importance of Warranty Registration Card Please take the time to fully complete and send in the Warranty Registration Card accompanying this Homeowner Manual as soon as it is received. This allows us to keep track of our systems and readily provide you with product and troubleshooting support if required. The Warranty Registration Card must be received within 90 days of the date of invoice by Waterloo Biofilter in order to make any claim against the Limited Warranty offered on your system.
Shipping and Labour Costs Under this Limited Warranty, Waterloo Biofilter will not pay labour costs for installation or removal of product for repairs or replacements covered by this Limited Warranty which are performed by a Waterloo Biofilter designated service provider or others during
8 of 12
5 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Limited Warranty Coverage Components manufactured by Waterloo Biofilter are warranted to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for the Warranty Period described below from the date of product shipment from our dock: • Mesh Basket Enclosure – three (3) year limited warranty Under this Limited Warranty, Waterloo Biofilter will, at its sole discretion, repair or furnish a replacement for such defective parts at no charge to the owner. Repaired or replacement parts will be warranted for the remaining portion of the original Warranty Period from the date of original product shipment.
Under this Limited Warranty, Waterloo Biofilter will replace at no charge to the owner the portion of foam filter medium that is determined by Waterloo Biofilter to be defective. Replacement filter medium will be warranted for the remaining portion of the original Warranty Period from the date of original product shipment.
Maintenance Contracts
Page 254 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
My Maintenance Provider Is
FAQ
Company: ____________________________________________
What is the protocol for vacations or seasonal homes? You do not need to do anything to the system when you leave it unattended for a long period of time. The pumps will remain inactive so long as no wastewater is being generated at the site.
Phone: ___________________________ Address: _____________________________________________
Maintenance Records Date
Notes
Signature
What do I do if the power goes out? The pumps will not function and the pump tank and anaerobic digester will start to fill up. Limit water use until the power returns.
Solutions to Common Problems Problem
Consequence
Solutions
Disinfectants
Kills the bacteria in anaerobic digester preventing proper treatment
Limit use of anti-bacterial products and disinfectants; use chlorine-free cleaning products
Kills bacteria; may contaminate ground • pesticides • prescription drugs water or wells
Don’t pour chemicals down the drain; direct water softener backwash away from the system
• bleach • chlorine
Chemicals
Paints
Kills bacteria; clogs pipes and disposal field
Don’t pour paints or solvents down the drain
Hydraulic Overload
Flushes solids out of anaerobic digester without a chance to be broken down
Wash only full loads of clothes or dishes; fix leaky toilets; don’t connect sump pumps or RV waste to system
• paints • solvents
• too much water flowing into system at one time
Don’t use an in-sink garbage disposal; don’t pour fats down the drain; scrape food off dishes before washing
May damage system; may cause water to pond; prevents necessary evaporation
Don’t drive heavy equipment over system; consult installer/service provider before re-grading; don’t pave leaching bed
• garburator dis-
Landscaping
• heavy objects • re-grading • paving
6 of 12
7 of 12
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Difficult for bacteria to breakdown; clogs pipes and disposal charge • fats, oils & grease field
Food /Grease
AGENDA ITEM #b) 143 Dennis Street, PO Box 400 Rockwood ON N0B 2K0 Tel: 519-856-0757 Fax: 519-856-0759 www.waterloo-biofilter.com
Waterloo Biofilter Residential Maintenance Checklist Installer:
_________________________________ Phone:
Owner:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail: ☐ OK
☒ No – See Notes
Anaerobic Digester
Not Applicable Notes:
☐ Inlet pipe enters InnerTube and is free of debris ☐ InnerTube secure ☐ InnerTube ends in 1st third of tank ☐ Water level in tank compared to inlet ☐ Fermentation present ☐ No evidence of FOGs ☐ Normal odour ☐ Organic material is breaking down ☐ No evidence of nonorganic material ☐ Pictures Sludge Measurements:_____________________________________________
Internal Pump Chamber or External Pump Tank
Notes:
☐ Pumps & floats working ☐ Forcemain free-draining ☐ Inline filter clean ☐ Splice box cord connectors are secured ☐ Splice box is free of standing water ☐ Pump ropes properly secured ☐ Pump and float wiring properly secured ☐ Float tree in correct position ☐ Pictures
Page 255 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Waterloo Biofilter Treatment Unit
Notes:
☐ SH ☐ BA ☐ FB ☐ BFHD ☐ BFCN ☐ Effluent is healthy ☐ No odour ☐ Passive air vent(s) clear Charcoal replacement needed ☐ yes ☐ no ☐ Nozzles clean ☐ Foam height appropriate ☐ Spray distribution even ☐ Foam colour normal ☐ Pumps & floats working
☐ Forcemains free-draining ☐ Recirculation ratio 50% ☐ Splice box cord connectors are secured ☐ Splice box is free of standing water ☐ Pictures
Control Panel ☐ Control panel operating ☐ Control panel timer setting correct ☐ Control panel alarms working ☐ Control panel sealed and free of corrosion ☐ Pictures
Notes: Pump Amps:
Leaching Bed
Notes:
☐ Bed is dry ☐ Access hatches secure ☐ Healthy grass cover ☐ Proper grading ☐ SBT spray height > 600 mm ☐ Pictures
Installation
Notes:
☐ Install looks good ☐ No construction debris found in system ☐ Electrical is correct ☐ Pictures
Homeowner
Notes:
Review of best practices needed ☐ yes ☐ no ☐ other
Recomendations Next Visit: ☐ 6 month ☐ 12 month
Technician’s Signature
Date
Page 256 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Time
AGENDA ITEM #b)
WSB® clean: Operator, Service & Maintenance Manual Models:
WSB 400 WSB 500 WSB 600 WSB 750 WSB 1000
WSB 1250 WSB 1500 WSB 1600 WSB 1800
1 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0 RES-WSB-OSM
Version 1.0
Page 257 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………..7
2
SAFETY INFORMATION……………………………………………………………………7
3
WSB® CLEAN SYSTEM OPERATION…………………………………………………..8
3.1 Pre-Treatment / Sludge Storage Chamber …………………………………..8 3.2 Biological Chamber (Bioreactor)………………………………………………….8 3.3 Final Clarifier ………………………………………………………………………………..8 3.4 Pump Tank (Optional) ………………………………………………………………….8 3.5 WSB® clean Wastewater Treatment System Layout ……………………..9 3.5.1 WSB 400 - 1000 – Single Tank Installation ……………………………….. 9 3.5.2 WSB-1250-1800 – Two Tank Installation ………………………………….. 9 3.5.3 Pump Tank – Example Installation…………………………………………. 9 3.6 WSB® System Model Designation ……………………………………………….10 3.7 System Classification ………………………………………………………………….10 3.8 Identification Plate……………………………………………………………………..10 4 WSB Component Functions / Settings …………………………………………..10 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5
Flow Equalization (EQ) / Balancing Pumps (optional) …………………10 Blowers……………………………………………………………………………………….11 Sludge Return Pumps………………………………………………………………….11 Sludge Return Air Lift …………………………………………………………………..11 Disposal Bed (Final Effluent) Pumps …………………………………………….11 Maintenance Schedules ……………………………………………………………..11
6
Maintenance Procedure ……………………………………………………………..11
6.1 Maintenance Equipment Checklist…………………………………………….12 6.2 Home/System Owner Inspections……………………………………………….12 6.3 Site Inspection ……………………………………………………………………………12 6.3.1 Inspect Lids …………………………………………………………………………. 12 6.3.2 Settled Ground……………………………………………………………………. 12 6.4 Gather Effluent Sample………………………………………………………………12 6.5 Bioreactor Inspection …………………………………………………………………12 6.5.1 Odors ………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 6.5.2 Media Color………………………………………………………………………… 13 6.5.3 Media Rollover ……………………………………………………………………. 13 6.5.4 Dissolved Oxygen Level Check …………………………………………… 13 6.5.5 Blower Pressure /CFM Check………………………………………………. 13 6.5.6 Water/Effluent Color/Texture ………………………………………………. 13 6.5.7 Liquid Level …………………………………………………………………………. 13 6.6 Final Clarifier Inspection ……………………………………………………………..13 6.6.1 Odors ………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 2 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 258 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.6.2 Floating Sludge …………………………………………………………………… 13 6.6.3 Sludge Level Check ……………………………………………………………. 14 6.6.4 Water/Effluent Color/Texture ………………………………………………. 14 6.6.5 Liquid Level Check ……………………………………………………………… 14 6.6.6 High Level Warning Float Check…………………………………………. 14 6.6.7 Electrical Cords …………………………………………………………………… 14 6.6.8 Media Transfer…………………………………………………………………….. 14 6.7 Pre-Treatment / Sludge Storage Tank Check………………………………14 6.7.1 Water/Effluent Color/Texture ………………………………………………. 14 6.7.2 Liquid Level Check ……………………………………………………………… 14 6.7.3 Sludge Level Check ……………………………………………………………. 15 6.7.4 Media Transfer Check…………………………………………………………. 15 6.8 Pump Tank Check………………………………………………………………………15 6.8.1 High Level Alarm Float Check …………………………………………….. 15 6.8.2 Low Level Pump Float Check ……………………………………………… 15 6.8.3 Inspect Electrical Cords ………………………………………………………. 15 6.9 Control Panel Check ………………………………………………………………….15 6.9.1 Error Reports Check…………………………………………………………….. 15 6.9.2 Settings Check ……………………………………………………………………. 16 6.9.3 Function Test……………………………………………………………………….. 16 6.9.4 Control Panel Alarms ………………………………………………………….. 16 6.10 Final Inspection ………………………………………………………………………….16 7 Troubleshooting…………………………………………………………………………..16 Effluent Water Quality Targets…………………………………………………….16 7.1 7.2 Media Transfer……………………………………………………………………………17 7.3 Media Rollover …………………………………………………………………………..17 7.4 Filling Degree Check ………………………………………………………………….18 7.5 Excessive sludge…………………………………………………………………………18 7.5.1 Troubleshooting Sludge Return Pump …………………………………. 18 7.5.2 Troubleshooting Suction Air Lift……………………………………………. 18 7.6 High Level and Low Level Floats …………………………………………………19 7.6.1 Audible Alarm Float Check:………………………………………………… 19 7.6.2 Continuity Test Float Check: ……………………………………………….. 19 7.7 Odors …………………………………………………………………………………………19 7.8 Controller Alarms………………………………………………………………………..20 7.8.1 Flooding ……………………………………………………………………………… 20 7.8.2 Overcurrent Alarm………………………………………………………………. 20 7.8.3 Undercurrent Alarm…………………………………………………………….. 21 7.8.4 Fuse Failure Alarm……………………………………………………………….. 21 7.8.5 Air Pressure Sensor Alarm…………………………………………………….. 22 8 Water Quality Testing…………………………………………………………………..22 3 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 259 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
8.1 Water Quality Targets…………………………………………………………………22 8.2 Water Quality Sampling ……………………………………………………………..22 8.2.1 Sampling with a Pump Tank………………………………………………… 22 8.2.2 Sampling without a Pump Tank…………………………………………… 23 8.3 Lab Test Requirements ……………………………………………………………….24 9 Service Procedures……………………………………………………………………..24 9.1 Blower Filter Replacement………………………………………………………….25 9.2 Blower Replacement………………………………………………………………….25 9.3 Sludge Return Pump Replacement…………………………………………….26 9.4 Sludge Return Air Lift Replacement…………………………………………….26 9.5 Sludge Return Air Lift Solenoid Replacement………………………………27 9.6 Pump Tank Disposal Pump Replacement …………………………………..27 9.7 Float Replacement…………………………………………………………………….28 9.8 Diffuser Replacement…………………………………………………………………28 9.9 Flow EQ Pump Replacement ……………………………………………………..28 9.10 Controller Replacement …………………………………………………………….29 10 CONTROL PANEL Overview ………………………………………………………….29 10.1 Controller Interface Overview…………………………………………………….29 10.2 The Customer Menu …………………………………………………………………..29 10.2.1 Device Information……………………………………………………………… 30 10.2.2 Optime ……………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Function Test……………………………………………………………………….. 30 10.2.3 10.2.4 Time/ Date ………………………………………………………………………….. 31 10.2.5 Timer (Display of Output Counters)……………………………………… 31 10.2.6 Sludge Removal………………………………………………………………….. 31 10.2.7 Maintenance Menu / Service Menu …………………………………… 31 10.2.8 Error Signals and Power Outage Warnings (Alarms) ……………. 31 10.3 Vacations and extended periods with limited usage………………….31 10.4 Controller Specifications & Dimensions……………………………………….32 11 Control Panel Configuration ………………………………………………………..32 11.1 “Parameter” Menu …………………………………………………………………….32 11.1.1 Device Settings …………………………………………………………………… 32 11.1.1.1 Device Name ……………………………………………………………… 32 11.1.1.2 Mode ………………………………………………………………………….. 33 11.1.1.3 I/O Module………………………………………………………………….. 33 11.1.1.4 Expansion Module ………………………………………………………. 33 11.1.2 Outputs……………………………………………………………………………….. 33 11.1.3 Inputs ………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 11.1.3.1 Input Modes………………………………………………………………… 34 11.1.4 Other Settings ……………………………………………………………………… 34 4 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 260 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
11.1.4.1 Function Test ……………………………………………………………….. 35 11.1.4.2 Error Report – Acoustic Output (Audible Internal Alarm) 35 11.1.4.3 Air Pressure ………………………………………………………………….. 35 11.1.4.4 Valve Output Reference …………………………………………….. 35 11.1.4.5 Run Bit …………………………………………………………………………. 35 11.2 “Optime” (Operation Time) Menu………………………………………………36 11.3 “Reports” Menu………………………………………………………………………….36 11.4 “Service” Menu ………………………………………………………………………….36 11.4.1 Device Information……………………………………………………………… 36 11.4.2 Customer ID ………………………………………………………………………… 36 11.4.3 Factory Reset………………………………………………………………………. 36 11.4.4 Input Test …………………………………………………………………………….. 37 11.4.5 Function Test……………………………………………………………………….. 37 11.4.6 Timer……………………………………………………………………………………. 37 11.5 “Settings” Menu …………………………………………………………………………37 11.5.1 Language …………………………………………………………………………… 37 11.5.2 Date / Time …………………………………………………………………………. 37 11.5.3 Display ………………………………………………………………………………… 37 11.5.4 Password …………………………………………………………………………….. 37 11.5.4.1 Forgot The Password? …………………………………………………. 38 11.5.4.2 Locking the Controller…………………………………………………. 38 12 Series 2 Controller Outputs…………………………………………………………..38 12.1 Outputs 1-4 ………………………………………………………………………………..38 12.2 Output 5 – Alarm Output ……………………………………………………………38 12.3 Output Modes ……………………………………………………………………………38 12.3.1 Off ………………………………………………………………………………………. 38 12.3.2 Pulse/Pause ………………………………………………………………………… 39 12.3.2.1 Pulse/Pause Per Cycle Duplex with Redundancy ……….. 40 12.3.3 Permanent On ……………………………………………………………………. 40 12.4 Pump Types………………………………………………………………………………..40 12.4.1 Valve…………………………………………………………………………………… 40 12.4.1.1 Valve Behavior ……………………………………………………………. 40 12.5 Min. Current and Max. Current …………………………………………………..41 13 Output Duplex / Redundancy Features………………………………………..41 13.1 Per Day Duplex Cycling with Redundancy …………………………………41 13.2 Per Cycle Duplex with Redundancy …………………………………………..41 14 Series 2 Controller Inputs ……………………………………………………………..42 14.1 Inputs 1 and 2 …………………………………………………………………………….42 15 Error Codes …………………………………………………………………………………42 16
Configuring the Air Pressure Sensor Output Error …………………………..43 5 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 261 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
17
WSB System Runtime parameter setting guidelines ………………………44
17.1 Blower Settings (Output 1) ………………………………………………………….44 17.2 Sludge Return Settings (Output 2)……………………………………………….45 17.3 Sludge Return Settings (Output 4)……………………………………………….45 17.4 WSB Phosphorus Precipitation Parameter Settings ………………………46 18 IMPORTANT OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS…………………………………………46 18.1 Harmful Chemicals …………………………………………………………………….46 18.2 Do Not ……………………………………………………………………………………….47 18.3 Best Practices …………………………………………………………………………….47 19 WSB Clean System Service Policy ………………………………………………..47 19.1 Extended Service Policy……………………………………………………………..48 20 Limited Warranty …………………………………………………………………………49
6 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 262 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
1
INTRODUCTION
This manual covers the operation and maintenance for all residential WSB® clean models. It is important that you read through this entire manual before providing any service on the system. If you have any questions after reading this document or if you need any further information, please contact a customer service representative at (519) 648-3475 RH2O North America Inc. 268 Woolwich St. S Breslau, Ontario, Canada N0B 1M0
Phone: (519) 648-3475 Fax: (519) 648-3585 info@rh2o.com www.rh2o.com
This manual provides maintenance and service guidelines to ensure proper operation of your WSB® clean system. It does not provide any maintenance/service information on any other components of your treatment system (i.e. disposal bed) or outline any local regulatory requirements. It is important that you read this manual in it’s entirety to ensure that all requirements and details are clearly understood. If there is anything that is unclear or missing contact the manufacturer for clarification before proceeding. Note: Please ensure that the system has been filled with clear water before starting the system. Electrical cables and plastic piping are buried close to your treatment system. Please contact your installation contractor or RH2O North America prior to any digging or excavation work in the area surrounding your treatment system. Failure to do so may result in electrical shock causing death or serious bodily injury in addition to expenses to repair any damaged pipes/electrical damage.
2
SAFETY INFORMATION
Please read and follow the precautions listed below, as well as those found throughout this document. If you have any questions regarding the safety or operation of the WSB® clean wastewater treatment system, please contact us at: (519) 648-3475. DANGER:
Always turn off the power to the system before servicing any components. Failure to do so may result in electrical shock causing serious bodily injury or death. All work must conform to local electrical, plumbing and building codes.
DANGER:
Electrical equipment in flooded areas presents an electrical hazard. Do not enter a flooded area. Entering a flooded area may result in electrical shock causing death or serious bodily injury.
If contact with wastewater occurs, please remove any contaminated clothing and thoroughly wash all body areas and clothing exposed to wastewater with soap and water. To minimize any risk of illness, consult a physician. Only authorized service personnel are to remove access covers on the WSB® system. Removal by unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily injury from potentially hazardous gases and waste matter. Please ensure easy access to covers at all times for inspection and/or emergency purposes. The use of this system when the air blower is not functioning can result in serious problems (i.e. clogging of your disposal bed/abnormal smells) and/or cancellation of the warranty.
7 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 263 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
3
WSB® CLEAN SYSTEM OPERATION
WSB® Clean is a fully biological wastewater treatment plant designed to treat domestic wastewater. Please refer to the Illustration and details below.
Pretreatment / Sludge Storage Chamber Biological Stage (Bioreactor) Biomedia Final Clarifier AirLift Diffuser Bar
3.1
Pre-Treatment / Sludge Storage Chamber
Incoming wastewater travels by gravity into the pre-treatment tank where coarse particles settle and are stored here along with return sludge from the final clarifier.
3.2
Biological Chamber (Bioreactor)
Pre-processed wastewater from the Pre-Treatment / Sludge Storage chamber is now fed into the biological stage which contains the specially designed plastic carrier media. Microorganisms settle on the media and consume the organic material in the wastewater. Oxygen is needed for the biological cleaning process and is supplied by an air blower and distributed by fine bubble diffusers.
3.3
Final Clarifier
The final clarifier consists of a cone or sloped area in order to collect and transfer any secondary sludge back to the sludge storage. Sludge Return will be accomplished by either an air lift or pump. From the clarifier, the biologically cleaned wastewater is ready to be discharged back into the environment either via gravity flow, or via a pump tank.
3.4
Pump Tank (Optional)
Depending on the type of disposal bed, you may have a pump tank to pressurize the treated effluent or lift the effluent to the bed. The pump tank stores treated effluent from the final clarifier and pumps it to the disposal bed at intervals based on the controller dosing pump settings. The dosing rate for the disposal bed should be determined by the designer of the disposal bed.
8 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 264 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
3.5
WSB® clean Wastewater Treatment System Layout
3.5.1 WSB 400 - 1000 – Single Tank Installation
3.5.2 WSB-1250-1800 – Two Tank Installation
3.5.3 Pump Tank – Example Installation
9 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 265 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
3.6
WSB® System Model Designation
Model Designation
Daily Capacity (L)
Number of Tanks
Pretreatment Capacity
NSF/ANSI 40 Classification
WSB 400
1600
1
2450 L
Class I
WSB 500
2000
1
2450 L
Class I
WSB 600
2500
1
2970 L
Class I
WSB 750
3000
1
2970 L
Class I
WSB 1000
3800
1
3490 L
Class I
WSB 1250
5000
2
5950 L
Class I
WSB 1500
5678
2
6950 L
Class I
WSB 1600
6300
2
6950 L
N/A
WSB 1800
7000
2
6950 L
N/A
Note: Please refer to the system data plate located on the control panel to identify which model you have.
3.7
System Classification
All WSB® Clean models meet the requirements of NSF/ANSI 40 and are certified as Class I treatment systems. Models with design flows larger then 5700 L/day (1500 Gallons/day) do not fall under the NSF / ANSI 40 scope of work but have been verified by NSF as meeting the same design criteria.
3.8
Identification Plate
The identification plate is found on the WSB® control panel. The information on this plate identifies the size of the system and it may be required for responding to any alarms or issues with the system. If an identification plate is not on the control panel, please contact RH2O immediately.
4
WSB® COMPONENT FUNCTIONS / SETTINGS
4.1
Flow Equalization (EQ) / Balancing Pumps (optional)
Flow equalization (balancing) pumps are used only on systems that require a lift station, or flow equalization tanks. The flow EQ pumps are configured to dose the system with the appropriate flows on a daily basis based on the system design criteria. The flow EQ pumps should be set to evenly deliver/pump the systems rated total daily design flow over a 24 hour period. For example: A system with a total daily design flow of 2400L and a pump with a flow rate of 100L/min, would be set for 1 minute pulse (ON) every 59 minute pause (OFF) cycle. This would evenly distribute the total flows across a 24 hour period.
10 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 266 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
4.2
Blowers
The blowers function in the WSB® process is to ensure that the floating media is mixed within the bioreactor and to maintain the appropriate dissolved oxygen levels required to sustain the proper bacterial growth on the media. The minimum dissolved oxygen level at the end of the pause cycle should be 2mg/L. The default settings for most WSB® home units is 9min ON / 6 Min off during the day and 5 min on/ 25min off during the night. These settings may have to be adjusted based on the size of the system, homeowner water usage and habits, and blower size.
4.3
Sludge Return Pumps
Sludge return pumps are located in the final clarifier(s) and are used to return any sludge build up that may occur within the final clarifier to the pre-treatment / sludge storage chamber. In some systems a sludge return air lift may be used in place of a sludge return pump. The sludge return pumps must remove the sludge at a rate to prevent sludge accumulation from taking place in the clarifier. For information on runtime settings please see section 17
4.4
Sludge Return Air Lift
The sludge return air lift is an alternate sludge return mechanism that instead of using a physical pump uses air flow and the resulting vacuum to suck any sludge that may have accumulated on the bottom of the final clarifier back to the pre-treatment / sludge storage chamber. For information on runtime settings please see section 17
4.5
Disposal Bed (Final Effluent) Pumps
In applications where it is not possible for the effluent to flow from the final chamber to the bed via gravity (or due to other regulatory requirements) a pump tank is used. The disposal pumps are located in the pump tank and will pump, based on runtime settings specific to the system design flows and the dosing pump flow rates, the final effluent to the disposal bed. A pump tank actually provides many advantages including more complete dosing of the bed. The disposal pump settings are based on the total system daily design flow and the size and type of disposal bed receiving the effluent. The actual runtime settings for the disposal bed pumps will be determined by the local regulations, and the engineering design report for the specific site and bed type.
5
MAINTENANCE SCHEDULES
NSF requires that all systems are serviced twice a year for the first 2 years. In addition to the NSF requirements your local regulatory agency may have additional service/maintenance requirements. The WSB® system itself is designed to operate normally with only annual servicing. IMPORTANT: It is your responsibility as the maintenance provider to ensure compliance with local regulations.
6
MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE
During regular, or unscheduled maintenance, any system changes, observations, and measurements taken shall be recorded by the service provider on the service card or similar document.
11 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 267 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.1
Maintenance Equipment Checklist
Equipment required for inspection and maintenance on a system are: Protective Gloves Eye protection Dissolved oxygen meter Sludge Measuring Device (i.e. Sludge Judge®) Robertson #2 screw driver CFM meter Sampler and bottles Filters for air blower
6.2
Home/System Owner Inspections
The treatment plant must be checked regularly to ensure that the system is operating properly. The system owner (homeowner), as outlined in the owner’s manual, is responsible for performing exterior system visual inspections on a weekly basis and reporting any controller alarm conditions immediately. It is recommended that the system/home owner check for alarms daily.
6.3
Site Inspection
As part of the regular maintenance procedure the following sections outline the site evaluation/inspection that should be performed on a WSB® clean system.
6.3.1 Inspect Lids Before service begins check all access openings for damage and ensure that the lids are properly sealed/secured onto the tank access opening.
6.3.2 Settled Ground When entering the site area do a visual scan for any settled ground around the treatment plant. Make sure there is no ground water ponding around the treatment plant area, and make sure proper grading is maintained to direct surface water away from treatment plant. If it is identified that the ground has settled around the treatment plant or that ponding is evident the homeowner should be instructed to improve the grade around the treatment plant to correct and level the settled areas. This will ensure proper surface water flow away from the treatment plant area and to prevent future ponding. NOTE: This is a good time to take a smell test to see if there are any odors coming from the treatment plant.
6.4
Gather Effluent Sample
Samples should always be gathered prior to doing any maintenance work on the system. Effluent samples may be taken if required by local regulations, or due to a desire to verify effluent quality. For detailed instructions on gathering samples see section 8.2
6.5
Bioreactor Inspection
6.5.1 Odors Before and after removing the lids to the bio-reactor you should do a smell check to tell if the system is working properly. At most you should notice a “mild musty smell”. A septic smell will mean the system is not operating properly and changes must be made.
12 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 268 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.5.2 Media Color After the start up period, the media will turn a light to dark brown colour. This is the bio-film growth and shows a healthy system. On heavier loaded systems it will turn a dark colour and a lighter colour for systems that have a lighter organic load. NOTE: During start-up, the bio-reactors may foam.
6.5.3 Media Rollover It will take approximately 2 weeks for the media to properly roll over completely in the bioreactor. It should be a gentle roll over and cover the complete reactor area. To fast of a rollover will result in a higher suspended solids count in the final clarifier, A slow roll over will not provide the proper cleaning of the media and may leave dead spots in the reactor. If you notice issues with media rollover refer to section 7.3.
6.5.4 Dissolved Oxygen Level Check Dissolved Oxygen levels should be measured at the end of a run cycle and at the beginning of a run cycle. Dissolved oxygen should never be below 2 mg/l. A Dissolved Oxygen meter is a tool that shall be used for these measurements.
6.5.5 Blower Pressure /CFM Check Take the air hose off the blower and attach the cfm meter to see if the blower is working within the blowers design cfm flow rate. Check hose connections and inspect blowers for any external damage or wear. Check filter (must be replaced at least once per year).
6.5.6 Water/Effluent Color/Texture When blower is off water should look clear on top of media and there should be a slightly mild musty odor.
6.5.7 Liquid Level Make sure that liquid levels are at proper levels and that there are no obstructions in the transfer pipes. The water level should under normal operation be at the bottom of the outlet. If it is higher or lower please refer to the trouble shooting guide.
6.6
Final Clarifier Inspection
6.6.1 Odors The clarifier should have a mild musty odour at most. If the odor is strong please see section 7.2 for troubleshooting procedures.
6.6.2 Floating Sludge If there is floating sludge in the final clarifier you must check the thickness to see how much is present. If it is very thick and dark brown/black then the sludge return rate should be increased. Atmospheric and temperature changes will cause floatables from time to time and does not necessarily indicate a system problem. If the floating sludge is very thick and dark brown/black it maybe necessary to schedule more frequent visits to check for increasing float sludge. If you notice that from visit to visit
13 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 269 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
the floating sludge blanket is increasing in thickness then this is an indication of improper sludge return/removal configuration.
6.6.3 Sludge Level Check If during the floating sludge check you notice significant levels of floating sludge a sludge level check should also be performed, as below, to check sludge levels on the bottom of the clarifier. A sludge judge® tool should be used for this check. Sludge levels need to be recorded and checked before the sludge return run cycle, and again at the end of the run cycle. This will determine if the sludge return run cycle is long enough to remove the settled sludge that has accumulated between each run cycle. If there is excessive sludge in the system the sludge return pump or suction air lift run time should be increased to ensure that adequate sludge return is achieved. For more information on troubleshooting excessive sludge see section 7.2
6.6.4 Water/Effluent Color/Texture Should generally be clear in color and little to no odor. If this is not the case please refer to the troubleshooting section.
6.6.5 Liquid Level Check Check to make sure that the water level in the clarifier is at or just below the outlet. This is the proper depth of water during normal operation. If the water level is high or low please refer to the troubleshooting section for possible causes.
6.6.6 High Level Warning Float Check High warning switch should be checked for proper level and that it is in working order. For details on testing floats please see section 7.2
6.6.7 Electrical Cords Check any electrical cords for any apparent damage and that they are properly fastened. Any damaged electrical cords should be repaired immediately.
6.6.8 Media Transfer Make sure no media has transferred from the bio-reactor into the clarifier. If any media has transferred it must be removed and put back into the bio-reactor. If you identify media transfer please see section 7.2 for possible causes and remedies.
6.7
Pre-Treatment / Sludge Storage Tank Check
6.7.1 Water/Effluent Color/Texture Normally water in the pre-treatment tank will have a septic smell with a possible scum layer.
6.7.2 Liquid Level Check Check to make sure liquid levels are at a proper depth and that the inlet from the house has no debris left in the pipe. Under normal operation, water levels should be at the bottom of the outlet from the sludge storage tank.
14 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 270 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.7.3 Sludge Level Check Using a Sludge Judge device, measure the level of sludge in this section of the tank. Once the level of sludge reaches a 60% depth the homeowner must be notified that this compartment must be emptied, and only this section of the tank is to be pumped. Generally a system would require pumping from the pre-treatment/sludge storage chamber every 1-3 years. IMPORTANT: The removal of solids from the pre-treatment / sludge storage chamber must be carried out by a specialized firm. The WSB® system has been designed so that only the pretreatment chamber requires periodic sludge removal. Sludge levels will be monitored as part of the maintenance agreement and homeowners will be notified when pumping is required. It is the homeowner’s responsibility to ensure sludge removal is performed by a certified professional, and in compliance with local regulations, and that all records of service are kept for future reference.
6.7.4 Media Transfer Check If media has transferred back into this chamber it must be removed and placed back into the bio-reactor. Usually this only happens if flooding occurs in the disposal bed or a blocked pipe to the disposal and liquid backs up into the system. If you identify media transfer please see section 7.2 for possible causes and remedies.
6.8
Pump Tank Check
6.8.1 High Level Alarm Float Check High warning switch should be checked for proper level and that it is in working order. The alarm trigger level should be set to allow ample time after alarm the goes off to have a service technician be able to arrive and fix the problem before a back up occurs in the house. For details on testing floats please see section 7.2
6.8.2 Low Level Pump Float Check Check the low level float for proper adjustment and that it is in working order. This float switch should be set that it will shut the timer control off while keeping the pump totally submerged under effluent. To check if the float is working pull the float out of the liquid, put it in the inactive position (down), and see if the timer for the pump tank stops running.
6.8.3 Inspect Electrical Cords Make sure all cords are free from damage and securely fastened. Any damaged cords should be repaired immediately.
6.9
Control Panel Check
6.9.1 Error Reports Check Read the error reports on the panel and download them or record them manually in a book for record keeping. Review the error reports that occurred since the last maintenance visit and assess their potential causes. Any errors which could be a result of improper use of the system (i.e. flooding alarms, system power loss etc.) should be discussed with the system/home owner and included on the maintenance report.
15 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 271 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
6.9.2 Settings Check Check all settings for the system with a laptop computer or manually to ensure they are correct.
6.9.3 Function Test Run panel through the function test to make sure all equipment is in proper working order. See section 10.2.3 for details on the function test.
6.9.4 Control Panel Alarms The Control Panel should be checked for any alarms that may be present during maintenance. Any alarm conditions should be assessed and addressed before maintenance is complete.
6.10 Final Inspection Before leaving check to make sure all lids are properly sealed and fastened down and leave a service report/indicator for the homeowner.
7
TROUBLESHOOTING
7.1
Effluent Water Quality Targets
When quality of treated effluent is not meeting the criteria as outlined in section 8.1, there are 4 major areas to look for problems. Possible cause Check dissolved oxygen levels to insure they are at least 2 mg/l at the end of the pause cycle.
Possible remedy You may have to adjust the blower run time to insure adequate dissolved oxygen is achieved for each run cycle to sustain it through the off cycle to above 2 mg/l. Caution should be taken not to make the pulse (“ON”) cycle too long which may cause too much stripping of the bio-film on the media. It may be more effective to reduce the pause (“off”)_time to allow for more frequent addition of dissolved oxygen.
Check media roll over when blower is running to insure that adequate pressure is coming from blower.
If too little roll over of media is observed then the likely cause is low pressure from the blower. You should first check your blower filter to make sure it is clean and free from obstructions. You should also check the blower for CFM levels to insure blower is performing within it’s specifications. Conduct a filling degree test as per section 7.4
Check the sludge level in the pretreatment sludge storage, and see if there is any unusual grease build up or chemical odours.
If sludge level is greater than 60% of total volume in pretreatment tank it maybe entering the bioreactor causing problems with the treatment. The homeowner must be advised to call a local pumping company to evacuate the pretreatment/sludge storage compartment. You may also need to test it for fats, oils and greases ( F.O.G.) or harmful chemicals if they are detected and have the compartment evacuated to
16 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 272 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
remove these. If there is continuous incoming flow maybe there is ground water infiltrating the system and/or water running constantly from house. The homeowner must be notified to check on these issues. Check to make sure sludge return pump or suction air-lift is operating properly.
Improper Homeowner Use
7.2
If sludge return pump has failed or is plugged it will cause sludge to build up in final clarifier and contaminate the final effluent. A check should be made to insure they are operating properly. If they are operating properly an adjustment of the pulse (ON) and pause (OFF) times may need to be done to get proper removal of settled sludge. See section 7.2 See section 11
Media Transfer
If you observe media in any tanks other than the bio-reactor the following table will help you to identify and address possible causes: Transfer Location Clarifier
Pre-Treatment
7.3
Possible cause Possible remedy Damaged outlet from bio-reactor Check the outlet pipe and slotted media filter in the bio-reactor and replace if damaged High water / flooding Check swing check valve between the pre-treatment sludge storage chamber and the bio-reactor to make sure it is operating properly
Media Rollover
The following table lists the likely causes of media rollover issues. Condition Insufficient rollover
Excessive rollover
Possible cause Blower not running
Possible remedy Verify blower is functioning properly and that no blower lines are clogged or disconnected Diffusers blocked or blower If the blower is operating within line blocked specifications but there is insufficient media rollover, the blower lines are blocked or the diffusers are clogged – check/clean/replace lines and/or diffusers Too much media in bioConduct a filling degree test as per reactor section 7.4 Too little media in bio-reactor Conduct a filling degree test as per section 7.4 Broken air line from diffuser Check lines and manifold for leaks manifold and repair or replace as necessary Incorrectly sized blower Check blower to ensure it is a proper blower as per the WSB® System suppliers specifications
17 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 273 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
7.4
Filling Degree Check
To conduct a filling degree test follow the instructions below: While the blower is running dip a 1L open jar down into the moving media and allow it to fill. Check to see what the percentage of media is versus liquid level. It should be between 40% and 65% filled with media. If the filling degree is lower or higher than the levels specified please contact the system manufacturer/supplier.
7.5
Excessive sludge
If during the maintenance / inspection tests it is identified that there is excessive sludge, before increasing the pump run times verify that the sludge return pumps are not clogged or restricted and/or that the suction air lift is operating correctly. Sludge levels need to be recorded and checked before the sludge return run cycle. At the end of the run cycle it should be measured again to insure all sludge has been removed. If not the run time may need to be increased. If you notice that sludge seems to be floating up prior to the scheduled sludge return pulse (ON) time commencing then shorten the pause (OFF) time as this indicates air has been used up in the sludge and wild denitrification is taking place.
7.5.1 Troubleshooting Sludge Return Pump To verify the sludge return pump is operating properly: From the Series 2 Control panel run the function test (see section 10.2.3) and monitor the current draw on the sludge return output to ensure it is within normal operating range. Check the sludge return line at the pre-treatment tank to ensure appropriate water flow levels when the sludge return pump is on
7.5.2 Troubleshooting Suction Air Lift If the blower is working properly and the air line is not plugged on a sludge return air-lift device, the solenoid should be checked to see if it is opening properly.
- Disconnect the air line going to the airlift at the solenoid output
- Enable the solenoid valve via the series 2 control panel (turn on appropriate output) and ensure that there is air flow through the solenoid. If there is no airflow through the solenoid the table below outlines some possible causes and remedies: Possible cause Blower not running Hose to inlet of solenoid clogged Solenoid failed
Possible remedy Verify blower is on when the solenoid valve output is on Disconnect inlet to solenoid, turn on solenoid and verify air flow If you have verified the blower is running, the output to the solenoid is on, and there is air pressure at the inlet of the solenoid, the solenoid itself may have failed. Replace Solenoid and retest
If there is airflow through the solenoid verify that the sludge return lines are not plugged.
18 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 274 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
7.6
High Level and Low Level Floats
If during inspection/test or during normal operation it is determined that a float is not operating properly the float needs to be tested. Below are troubleshooting instructions that should be followed in order to verify float operation.
7.6.1 Audible Alarm Float Check: 1. 2. 3. 4.
First ensure that the float is connected to the control panel. Ensure that the control panel is configured to alarm on active high or active low condition for the float. Hold the float in the active state; Up is on (active), down is off (inactive) on all floats in the WSB® system. After 10 seconds in the active state the controller should begin to alarm. If you hear an alarm then the float is operating properly. NOTE: it is important to make sure the controller is powered and that the alarm buzzer is connected and/or the internal audible alarm is enabled in the controller menu.
If you don’t hear any alarm after 10-15 seconds it doesn’t necessarily mean the float is not working. You must first check the controller to see if an alarm condition is being displayed on the controller interface screen. If you see that an alarm is present on the controller interface screen the float is working. If you did not hear an alarm you need to check the alarm configuration settings.
7.6.2 Continuity Test Float Check: If the float is not causing an alarm and you have ensured that the controller is configured to detect the alarm you can check the float with a continuity meter.
- Disconnect the float from the controller input.
- Place the float in the active state; up is on, and down is off for all floats
- Place the continuity meter probes across the 2 terminals of the float.
- If the float is working properly there should be continuity between the terminals when the float is in the active state.
- Move the float to the inactive state and connect the continuity meter across the terminals again. There should be no continuity with the float in the inactive state.
- If both of these tests pass the float is working properly and should be reconnected to the controller.
- If you are not getting an alarm during the Audible Alarm Float Check double check your alarm configuration to make sure that it is setup properly. NOTE: If there is a junction box between the controller and the float it may be that there is a connection issue within the junction box. Please check these connections above if the alarm and continuity tests both fail.
7.7
Odors
Insufficient oxygen will result in odours and improper treatment. If you are detecting odours please review the blower configuration settings and test the Dissolved Oxygen levels as per section 6.5.4. Possible cause Hydraulic overloads
Insufficient pressure on blower
Possible remedy Check all toilets for leaks and ensure all taps are turned off Check for eaves or sump pumps connected to system or ground water infiltration Check air filter first , then check the
19 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 275 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Chemical contaminates
Fat’s Oils and greases
Insufficient Dissolved Oxygen
7.8
blower CFM output to insure it is adequate. Talk with homeowner about the do’s and don’ts and sample incoming for contaminates. If you are unsure but believe the issue is related to chemical contaminants then a test sample should be taken to check for contaminants. See section 11 for do’s and don’ts Sample for Fats Oils and Grease and talk with homeowner about proper system operations. You may have to adjust the blower run time to insure adequate dissolved oxygen is achieved for each run cycle to sustain it thru the off cycle to above 2 mg/l. Caution should be taken not to make the on cycle too long which may cause too much stripping of the bio-film on the media. It may be more effective to reduce the off time to allow for more frequent addition of dissolved oxygen.
Controller Alarms
7.8.1 Flooding Flooding Alarms will occur when the water level in the specific chamber increases above the normal operating level. Causes can vary depending on the chamber of the system in which the flooding alarm is being identified. Possible cause Excessive flow to system
Possible remedy Check all toilets for leaks and ensure all taps are turned off. Check Water Softeners and other similar appliances.
Failed pump in pump tank (for systems with a pump tank only) Failed or saturated bed Ground/surface water Infiltration
Replace pump Call service provider Check for eaves or sump pumps connected to system
7.8.2 Overcurrent Alarm On residential systems all pumps except the Disposal Bed pump (current sense optional) have integrated current monitoring. The current sense allows for early detection of pump failure that can lead to flooding alarms, or other issues with proper system operation. Possible cause Failed Pump / Blower
Possible remedy Replace Pump / Blower
20 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 276 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Jammed or clogged pump Blower hose break or connection loss Max Current Alarm Level on controller set too low.
Inspect pump and impeller for possible obstructions Inspect blower lines and connections While the pump / blower is in operation check the current reading on the controller screen. If the pump/blower is operating within its rated specifications for current draw it might be that the max current setting for the output in question was set too low and needs to be adjusted.
7.8.3 Undercurrent Alarm On residential systems all pumps except the Disposal Bed pump (current sense optional) have integrated current monitoring. The current sense allows for early detection of pump failure that can lead to flooding alarms, or other issues with proper system operation. Possible cause Possible remedy Failed Pump / Blower Replace Pump / Blower Breaker or fuse blown If the pump has a separate fuse or breaker ensure that it has not blown/tripped and that the pump/blower is getting power. Wiring issue With all power to the system turned off, inspect electrical wires for the pump at the controller and any junction boxes to ensure no connections have come loose or corroded. Plugged/clogged diffusers on bio-reactor Inspect blower lines for obstructions blower TH and change diffuser if they are plugged. Min Current Alarm Level on controller set too high
While the pump / blower is in operation check the current reading on the controller screen. If the pump/blower is operating within its rated specifications for current draw it might be that the min current setting for the output in question was set too high and needs to be adjusted.
7.8.4 Fuse Failure Alarm All outputs on the WSB® controller are fused. If there is an overcurrent condition for too long the fuse may blow and result in a fuse blown alarm. Under normal conditions the high current alarm check should prevent the fuse from blowing but there are some conditions in which the fuse may still blow. Possible cause Possible remedy Failed Pump / Blower causing excessive Replace Pump / Blower current draw Short circuit With power off inspect the wiring to the pump to ensure there are no short circuits. This can also be done with a multimeter set to measure resistance (ohms).
21 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 277 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
7.8.5 Air Pressure Sensor Alarm WSB® systems with a suction air lift for sludge return are equipped with a solenoid valve to control the air flow to the suction lift. An air pressure sensor line is installed after the solenoid that runs back to the controller to ensure that when the suction air lift is supposed to operate that air flow is present and within acceptable ranges. Possible cause Possible remedy Blower Line rupture or disconnect Check all air lines to the solenoid and suction air lift Failed Blower Verify blower is operating correctly and replace if it has failed Failed solenoid Check to ensure that the solenoid is operating correctly and replace if failed Incorrect Min/Max pressure settings for air Verify the min and max air pressure pressure sensor sensor settings are set correctly in the controller for the specified blower
8
WATER QUALITY TESTING
8.1
Water Quality Targets
The WSB® clean system has been designed to treat wastewater under normal operating conditions to meet the following effluent criteria:
8.2
Parameter
Standard
BOD5 CBOD5 TSS
< 15 mg/L < 10 mg/L <10 mg/L
Water Quality Sampling
It is critical that appropriate procedures are followed when gathering a sample to ensure that accurate water quality testing can be conducted that is truly representative of the treatment plants operation. Sampling must be taken by a person trained and certified by RH2O North America to ensure the sample gives accurate results in regards to how the system is performing.
8.2.1 Sampling with a Pump Tank Always use adequately sized sampling containers. Sampling containers must be prepared and sterilized prior to collection at sampling site. Create flow through the system by one of the following:
- Turn on fixtures in home
- Add water to the pre-treatment tank by using a garden hose or
- Pumping water back from the pump tank (if applicable)
- Locate the effluent pipe feeding from the WSB® clean system to the pump tank (in the event of no pump tank being present refer to section below regarding sampling without a pump tank).
- Carefully place mouth of sampling bottle into the free falling stream of effluent, do not allow the mouth of the sampling bottle to touch the pipe or the wall of the pump tank, depending on how far the pipe protrudes into the chamber
22 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 278 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Fill sample bottle almost to the top, ensure there is some room for 5-10% expansion during transport
Make sure that the lid of the sample jar is not contaminated and that no dust or debris gets inside the sample. If something gets inside, a new sample bottle must be used and another sample taken 8. Cap and label sample. 9. Samples must be stored in a cooler with ice during transport 10. The samples should be dropped off at the accredited laboratory immediately and any necessary paperwork must also be filled (e.g. Chain of Custody). 11. Check with your local laboratory to ensure proper size and labelling of samples are being met to ensure accurate sampling results. NOTE: The sample should be taken to the laboratory within 24hrs, ideally sooner.
8.2.2 Sampling without a Pump Tank 1. 2.
Always use adequately sized sampling containers. Sampling containers must be prepared and sterilized prior to collection at sampling site. Locate the Clarifier section of the WSB® model to be sampled, specifically where the outlet pipe is located.
23 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 279 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
8.3
Carefully place the end of the suction hose into the 6” outlet pipe just below the surface of the effluent and make sure the walls of the pipe are not brushed with the hose. Place the other end of the hose in the sample jar and turn on the pump (supplied by RH2O) to suck water from the Clarifier to the sample jar.
NOTE: The sampling pump and hose should be cleaned with a cleaning solution each morning prior to taking samples. Fill sample bottle almost to the top, ensure there is some room for 5-10% expansion during transport
Make sure that the lid of the sample jar is not contaminated and that no dust or debris gets inside the sample. If something gets inside, a new sample bottle must be used and another sample taken Cap and label sample. Samples must be stored in a cooler with ice during transport The samples should be dropped off at the accredited laboratory immediately and any necessary paperwork must also be filled (e.g. Chain of Custody). Check with your local laboratory to ensure proper size and labelling of samples are being met to ensure accurate sampling results.
Lab Test Requirements
All samples must be tested by an authorized laboratory as per local regulatory requirements.
9
SERVICE PROCEDURES
IMPORTANT: If any equipment or parts are replaced the serial number and model number of the new component must be recorded on the service record and provided to RH2O North America.
24 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 280 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
9.1
Blower Filter Replacement 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
9.2
Lock out and tag controller power source. Undo the cover screw securing the cover to the pump housing. Remove the cover and filter pad Replace filter pad and cover Secure the cover with the cover screw Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly.
Blower Replacement 1. 2. 3. 4.
Lock out and tag controller power source Remove air line and power cord and install new approved blower Hook up electrical and air line Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly
WSB-400 – WSB-1000 (with Airlift)
25 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 281 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
WSB-1250-WSB-1800 (with sludge return pumps)
9.3
Sludge Return Pump Replacement 1. 2.
Lock out and tag controller power source. Undo union and pull out pump via pvc pipe. IMPORTANT: Do not lift the pump via the electrical cord. Disconnect the old pump electrical cord from junction box connection and pull through conduit. Feed new pump electrical cord through the conduit from the clarifier to the junction box. Connect electrical in junction box Remove outlet fitting and union from the old pump and put it on the new pump outlet. Put pump back into chamber via the PVC pipe.
IMPORTANT: Do not lower the pump via the electrical cord. Connect the union on the sludge return pump outlet to the sludge return pump line and connect. 9. Turn on power and test pump for proper operation. 10. Make sure union does not leak. 8.
9.4
Sludge Return Air Lift Replacement 26 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 282 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Lock out and tag controller power source.
Undo union and remove air lift from clarifier. Remove air line connection from old air lift and connect to new air lift. Place new air lift into clarifier. Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly. Make sure union does not leak while it is operating.
For procedures on testing the sludge return air lift see section 7.5.2
9.5
Sludge Return Air Lift Solenoid Replacement 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
9.6
Lock out and tag controller power source. Disconnect inlet and outlet air lines from the solenoid. Remove fittings from old solenoid and do not discard. Install old fittings removed in step above, to the new solenoid. Connect inlet and outlet air lines to new solenoid. Connect new solenoid to AC power Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly. Make sure air line does not leak while it is operating.
Pump Tank Disposal Pump Replacement 1. 2. 3.
Lock out and tag power source. Undo union connecting pump to disposal bed. Remove existing pump. IMPORTANT: Care must be taken to never lift pump by electrical cord or damage to water tightness of cord may happen Remove outlet pipe and union from old pump Install output pipe and union from old pump onto the replacement pump. IMPORTANT: If using a different approved replacement pump you must ensure that the outlet pipe/union and new pump result in the same height for proper connection to the existing plumbing when placed in the tank.
27 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 283 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
9.7
Place new pump into tank and ensure outlet pipe union mates appropriately with internal pipe union. Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly. Make sure union has no leaks.
Float Replacement 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Lock out and tag power source Remove existing float Take note of location of float weight as it is critical to ensure the weight is located at the exact same position on the new float. Put float weight on new float and install new float in tank Make sure to turn back on power and check float for proper operation.
IMPORTANT: Make sure the float weight is installed at the exact same location as it was on the old float that was just removed. Ensure an excess float cord is wrapped and not left floating in the tank.
9.8
Diffuser Replacement
If a diffuser becomes plugged or damaged it will need replacement. To replace the diffusers: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Lock out and tag power source Disconnect the air line from the air drop pipe. This drop pipe is connected to the diffuser air divider. Pull up the air divider with the drop pipe and then remove the damaged air diffuser Replace the diffuser with a new approved diffuser. Place air divider back into proper position Re-attach air line from blower to the air drop pipe Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly.
NOTE: If the manufacturer of the diffusers recommends cleaning, follow cleaning steps as per their instructions.
9.9
Flow EQ Pump Replacement 1. 2. 3.
Lock out and tag power source. Undo union connecting pump to pre-treatment chamber. Remove existing pump.
IMPORTANT: Care must be taken to never lift pump by electrical cord or damage to water tightness of cord may happen Remove outlet pipe and union from old pump Install output pipe and union from old pup onto the replacement pump.
IMPORTANT: If using a different approved replacement pump you must ensure that the outlet pipe/union and new pump result in the same height for proper connection to the existing plumbing when placed in the tank. Place new pump into tank and ensure outlet pipe union mates appropriately with internal pipe union. Restore power and test to assure it is functioning properly. Make sure union has no leaks
28 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 284 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
9.10 Controller Replacement If controller needs replacement a qualified licensed electrician will need to be called to make this change.
10 CONTROL PANEL OVERVIEW Installation may only be carried out by a qualified electrician! The WSB® clean control panel is preconfigured for standard operation of your wastewater treatment system. The panel comes equipped with a visual and audible alarm to notify you of any mechanical or high water conditions should problems ever arise. The Control panel operates all of the mechanical components of the WSB® system. The control panel must be protected by a dedicated breaker in the in-house or building as per the installation manual.
10.1 Controller Interface Overview
1 2 3 4 5 6
Status display of the outputs; display of the actual current consumption of the system Display of the system time and date Display of the operating mode Display showing when the service menu is locked Display of the GSM status with signal strength (remote monitoring) Display showing when the control is connected to a read out device
10.2 The Customer Menu The Customer Menu is called up by pressing either of the arrow keys . Navigation in the customer menu is also carried out using these keys. The customer menu provides access to the basic information a customer may require access to and is not protected by the system password.
29 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 285 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
10.2.1 Device Information The Device Information screen provides an overview of all the revision information associated with the system.
10.2.2 Optime The optime view allows you to see the operating times for each of the outputs. You can select whether to view the Total operating time for the specified output or the Calendar Week (CW) for each output. Along with each output the Pump Type is also displayed. The left/right arrow keys
allow you to select the output to view.
The up/down arrow keys allow you to set the period in which the operating hours should be displayed (Total or Calendar Week).
10.2.3 Function Test The function test verifies proper operation of all outputs and also does a battery backup test to determine if the batteries need to be replaced. The function test will turn on each output separately regardless of the operation time settings or day/night settings etc. Parameters Description Test start Press OK to initiate the function test Start delay Specifies the start delay between actual function testing and pressing the Test Start option. Pulse duration Specifies how long each output will be pulsed during testing
30 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 286 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
10.2.4 Time/ Date Date/time systems adjustments can be made in this menu point. Parameters Description Date Allows you to set the current date Time Format 12 or 24hr format Time Allows you to set the current time Summer Time Daylight Savings Time enable/disabled
10.2.5 Timer (Display of Output Counters) Displays the run time counters for all current output configurations. This view allows you to see the state of all outputs (on/off) as well as the pulse/pause counter values for each output. NOTE: if the output is not configured to use a timer (i.e. Pulse/Pause) the timer value will always be zero (0).
10.2.6 Sludge Removal The sludge removal maintenance setting allows you to log a sludge removal event into the Error Report. You can select how many days the system will be shut-down for sludge removal and how long Output 3 will subsequently be turned OFF during this process.
10.2.7 Maintenance Menu / Service Menu The maintenance menu is launched on the OK or ESC key. This menu is protected by a password and may be accessed only by RH2O or its duly authorized representative.
10.2.8 Error Signals and Power Outage Warnings (Alarms) If an error signal appears on the display and the display blinks, the signal can be cancelled by depressing the ESC key for 5 seconds. If the power is out or disconnected, a warning signal will sound after one minute. This signal can also be cancelled by depressing the ESC key for 5 seconds. The warning signal will sound for 2 seconds every 2 seconds in the first 10 minutes. After 10 minutes it will sound for 5 seconds every minute. After 1 hour it will sound for 20 seconds every 30 minutes. This is a set timed program and cannot be changed unless accessed remotely by RH2O. The control panel documents and logs all error messages.
10.3 Vacations and extended periods with limited usage The WSB® clean system has been designed to continue operating properly even with limited or extended periods of no usage. The power can be left on for a vacation and the performance of
31 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 287 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
the system will not be impacted, even with little or no flow to the system. If the property is only used seasonally, (a winter lodge or only for summer months) and if the time that there would be no flows exceeds 4 consecutive weeks, the power can be shut down to the panel and blower. Once the property is lived in again, the power should be immediately turned back on.
10.4 Controller Specifications & Dimensions Supply to KL8: Input protection: Protection for output 1,2,4: Protection for output 3,5: Output voltage at output 1-5: Output voltage at KL1+KL2: Max. current per 5V output: Input voltage to KL1+KL2: Protection class: Height: Width: Depth: Weight:
11
115V AC 60Hz 500mA slow230V class H 5A slow/230V class H 2,5A slow/230V class H 115V AC 60Hz 5V/DC 100mA 5V/DC Only for indoor use 185 mm 215 mm 95 mm ca. 1kg
CONTROL PANEL CONFIGURATION
The Main Menu is called up by pressing the OK button while on the main status home screen. The main menu is a controlled area of the Series 2 controller and requires a password to enable access (see section 11.5.4). Each of the options in the Main Menu lead to submenus as outlined below.
11.1 “Parameter” Menu 11.1.1 Device Settings 11.1.1.1 Device Name The Device Name is set by the manufacturer of the system to reflect a specific configuration that is programmed into the Series 2 controller, thus giving it a specific application behavior. If the Device Name is not set by the manufacturer the Device Name displayed on the front panel will be the specific Class type that this controller was designed for at the factory (i.e. Class C/N). However, if the Device Name is programmed even once, the device name displayed will always be based on the Device Name field (even if it is programmed with all blanks = no name). Below are instructions on how to set the Device Name:
- From the main status menu press OK to enter the Main Menu.
- Then select Service and Press OK to enter the Service Menu.
32 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 288 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Select Device Name, and press OK.
Set a unique Device Name using the up and down arrows to scroll through the available characters and symbols and by using the left and right arrows to select the character location. When you are finished press OK. NOTE: The Device Name can be a maximum of 13 alpha numeric characters.
11.1.1.2 Mode The mode allows for selection of the available class types for the controller (i.e. Class C/N, Class C/N + P etc). The default setting is Class C/N for carbon removal and nitrification and is the mode in which the water quality targets are met as per section 8.1.
11.1.1.3 I/O Module Allows for enabling / disabling of the I/O module. The I/O module is not used on standard residential WSB® clean systems. NOTE: The I/O module is connected to the Series 2 controller via the Series 2 DB9 serial port, and connector X4 on the I/O module.
11.1.1.4 Expansion Module Allows you to select and enable the various available expansion modules for use with the Series 2 controller. These include, but are not limited too, GSM, GPRS, LAN, Bluetooth etc. NOTE: if you enable the GSM or GPRS module additional sub menu items will be available and require configuration.
11.1.2 Outputs The outputs sub menu allows you to select outputs for configuration (outputs 1-8) as well as settings for redundancy. This is where you would adjust the settings for blowers, pumps, valves etc. that are controlled by the Series 2 controller. For detailed information on configuration of output parameters please refer to section 12 Series 2 Controller Outputs.
11.1.3 Inputs The inputs sub menu allows you to configure output independent alarms conditions for a given input. The configuration for a high level alarm in a pump tank, for example, would require that you set the mode to “Flooding” and specify the signal level as “Active High”.
33 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 289 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
This would cause a controller alarm in the pump tank for the corresponding input if the float is high. Unlike a cut-off alarm in an output Pulse/Pause configuration the Input menu is where inputs are configured for generic alarm indications that are not specific to any output. Care should be taken not to configure an input in this menu which has also been configured as a cut-off in an output configuration unless you are certain this is the behavior you want. These inputs only cause an external visual and audible alarm via output 5 as well as an error to be placed into the error log as per the selected Mode. Additionally, if the controller has a GPRS, Ethernet, or similar remote monitoring device and email, or SMS message (or appropriate remote communications mechanism) will be used to provide a remote notification of the alarm condition. Parameters Mode Signal Level
Description Select the desired mode. See section 11.1.3.1 Specifies the signal condition that must be met by the input for the specified Mode to be recognized and an alarm generated.
NOTE: you cannot set more than one input with the same input alarm mode.
11.1.3.1 Input Modes The following table explains the available Input Modes and there behaviors: Parameters Off Tank Monitoring / Tank Empty
Flooding 1
Motor Safety Switch Flooding 2
Description Input monitoring is off Causes a tank monitoring error to be written to the error log. The specific condition for Tank Monitoring is dependant on the specific installation and configuration. Causes a flooding error to be written to the error log. Flooding errors are typically used to indicate a high water level in a specific tank. Causes a motor safety swtich error to be written to the error log. Causes a flooding error to be written to the error log. Flooding errors are typically used to indicate a high water level in a specific tank.
IMPORTANT: Do not set more than one input to the same “Mode” as they will conflict with each other. For additional information on inputs please refer to section 14 Series 2 Controller Inputs.
11.1.4 Other Settings The other settings sub menu allows access to a number of additional sub menu’s for advanced operation of the Series 2 controller.
34 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 290 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
11.1.4.1 Function Test Allows for configuration of the Function Test features. See section 10.2.3 for more information.
11.1.4.2 Error Report – Acoustic Output (Audible Internal Alarm) Allows for enabling / disabling of the audible alarm which will sound each time an error occurs on the series 2 controllers. If the acoustic output is off the controller will still generate an audible alarm if the controller loses power (as long as the external battery is connected and has power). The on/off control of the acoustic output is only for alarm fault conditions. NOTE: This does not disable the external alarm output (output 5). If an error condition is present on the controller output 5 will always pulse to cause an audible/visual alarm if connected.
11.1.4.3 Air Pressure Allows you to specify the minimum and maximum air pressure readings for the onboard air pressure sensor. You are also able to configure the reference output associated with the air pressure sensor. For more information see section 16
11.1.4.4 Valve Output Reference The valve output reference specifies the output on the series 2 controller that will turn on when the valve turns. The valve output reference can be configured to any available output on the series 2 controller. As an example, this feature would be used to turn on a blower connected to output 1 for a sludge return air lift operating on output 3. For more information see section 12.4.1
11.1.4.5 Run Bit The Series 2 Controller has a configurable parameter called the Run Bit. The Run Bit allows the user to start and stop the output logic state machine by setting it to either ON (FW running) or OFF (firmware not running). The purpose of the Run Bit is to allow the user to stop the FW output logic state machine thus allowing multiple changes to the output configuration settings to be made using the Series 2 interface panel without having each minor change take effect as each parameter is set individually. This way you can configure all outputs and all associated parameters, based on the Mode selected for each output without having the settings take effect immediately. When you have completed setting all the output and input settings if you turn the Run Bit back ON the FW will start all outputs just as would occur on a system start-up. NOTE: If you set the Run Bit to OFF all timers are reset and all outputs are turned off. This prevents any outputs which may have been on at the time the Run Bit was set to OFF, from staying on. IMPORTANT: The run bit will NOT reset itself if you forget to turn it back on. You must either cycle power on the controller or manually turn the run bit back on to ensure the controller is once again running.
35 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 291 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
11.2 “Optime” (Operation Time) Menu The optime menu provides access to additional operation time features not available in the customer menu. These include: Parameters Show Delete (Total) Delete (CW)
Description Same as the optime view available in the customer menu. See section 10.2.2 Allows you to delete all optime information Allows you to delete the Current Week (CW) optime information
11.3 “Reports” Menu The reports menu allows you to view and/or delete all report information stored on the series 2 controller. This information is very valuable in detecting issues and tracking errors that have occurred on the controller.
11.4 “Service” Menu The service menu contains a number of sub menus providing access to more advanced service features not available via the customer menu as outlined in the following sections.
11.4.1 Device Information See section 10.2.1
11.4.2 Customer ID The Customer ID field allows for a way to uniquely identify a controller installation with a specific customer. This is set by the manufacturer and should never be changed. If the Customer ID is set, it will be included in all Email and SMS messages sent by the controller GPRS/GSM remote monitoring features to further assist in identifying the controller that generated the SMS or Email message
11.4.3 Factory Reset Allows you to reset the controller to factory defaults.
36 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 292 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
11.4.4 Input Test The input test allows you to view the status of the various inputs on the series 2 controller. You can activate and deactivate the inputs connected to the controller and confirm proper operation of these triggers by visually monitoring the graphics available.
In addition by using the up and down arrow keys you can view the state of all fuses (black background = Fuse OK), as well as the current reading on the air pressure sensor.
11.4.5 Function Test See section 10.2.3
11.4.6 Timer See section 10.2.5
11.5 “Settings” Menu The settings menu provides access to advanced settings not available through the customer menu.
11.5.1 Language Allows you to specify the display language.
11.5.2 Date / Time See section 10.2.4
11.5.3 Display Allows for configuration of various display features such as the illumination/backlight triggers, brightness control and contrast control.
11.5.4 Password The password submenu allows you to change the access password required to enter the advanced configuration menu options available for the series 2 controller. Essentially, the password protects all configuration options except those available from the Customer Menu. CAUTION: Setting a password of 000000 will disable password access and allow anyone to access all configuration parameters. This should be used with extreme caution.
37 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 293 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
IMPORTANT: Write your new password down and keep it in a safe place so you don’t loose it.
11.5.4.1 Forgot The Password? If you forget the password for a controller the password can be reset. Please contact RH2O.
11.5.4.2
Locking the Controller
If you have entered your password and do not want to leave the interface unlocked until the automatic internal password lock timer expires and requires password entry again hold the ESC key for 2 seconds to force password protection and lock the controller interface.
12
SERIES 2 CONTROLLER OUTPUTS
The following sections provide detailed technical and configuration information on the inputs and outputs available on the Series 2 controller.
12.1 Outputs 1-4 The series 2 controller has 4 primary AC outputs; Outputs 1, 2, 3, and 4. The outputs are designed for control of 115V power as supplied on the main controller input connector. The controller has a maximum total current rating of 20A. The output current ratings are identified in the table below: Output 1 2 3 4
Max Current (A) 5 5 2.5 5
Voltage 115V 115V 115V 115V
12.2 Output 5 – Alarm Output The Alarm Output allows for connection of 115V buzzers and lights which will pulse when an alarm condition is present on the Series 2 controller. The alarm output rating is identified below: Output Max Current (A) 5 2.5A
Voltage 115V
12.3 Output Modes 12.3.1 Off Specified output is off. NOTE: If another output is configured as a “Valve” and references this output it will turn on when the valve is on regardless of output mode setting.
38 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 294 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
12.3.2 Pulse/Pause Pulse/Pause mode allows the user to configure ON (pulse) and OFF (pause) times for the specified output. The pulse/pause mode allows you to specify a daytime period and a nighttime period so that different pulse/pause settings can be used based on expected changes during the daytime and/or nighttime. In addition a cutoff signal source can be used as protection for the output so that if, for example, the water level is too low the current pulse/pause cycle will be stopped and reset and will only re-start when the cutoff signal source has indicated the input condition that stopped the cycle is no longer present. NOTE: If another output is configured as a “Valve” and references this output it will turn on when the valve is on regardless of output mode setting. Parameters Pump Type Min Current Max Current
Day Start
Day Stop
Day Pulse Day Pause Night Start
Night Stop
Night Pulse Night Pause Week Program
Initial State Cutoff Source
Cutoff Level
Description See section 12.4 Sets the minimum current alarm level for the output Sets the maximum current alarm level for the output If set to 0 the max current monitoring is disabled When setting current for Contactor 50A the current value increment is 1A. There are no decimal values for the 50A contactor setting. Specifies the daytime period start time NOTE: Set Day Start = Day Stop and no daytime operation period exists so the day pulse and pause settings do not execute Specifies the daytime period end time NOTE: Set Day Start = Day Stop and no daytime operation period exists so the day pulse and pause settings do not execute Specifies the daytime pulse/ON period Specifies the daytime pause/OFF period Specifies the night time period start time NOTE: Set Night Start = Night Stop and no night time operation period exists so the day pulse and pause settings do not execute Specifies the night time period end time NOTE: Set Night Start = Night Stop and no night time operation period exists so the day pulse and pause settings do not execute Specifies the night time pulse/ON period Specifies the night time pause/OFF period Specifies the days of the week the Pulse/Pause program is active. This allows you to turn off the pulse/pause program (both daytime and night time periods) The initial state parameter allows you to specify if a cycle should start in the pulse or pause state. Allows you to specify an input source as an override to the existing pulse/pause configuration. NOTE: if the Cutoff Source is activated the pulse/pause cycle is stopped, the pulse/pause times reset, and will restart when the cut-off source deactivates Specifies if the cut-off source is activated by a high level or a low level on the Cutoff Source input.
39 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 295 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Per Cycle Duplex
Output reference for per cycle duplex configuration with redundancy
NOTE: Daytime settings will override nighttime settings if they overlap.
12.3.2.1 Pulse/Pause Per Cycle Duplex with Redundancy In some applications it is important to have duplex/alternating outputs that operate on a per cycle basis. If this is required it can be configured very easily by simply selecting the second output, from the “Duplex Output” parameter list, to be used as the duplex slave output to the currently configured pulse/pause output. When using per cycle duplex redundancy is automatically built in, therefore, it is not necessary for you to setup master/slave redundancy from the menu as you would if using per day cycling.
12.3.3 Permanent On The specified output is always on.
12.4 Pump Types The pump types selection allows you to select common pump types from a list. If the pump you are using is available within the list the min and max current settings will automatically be set for that specific pump model. NOTE: It is still recommended to verify the min and max current settings even when selecting a pump from the list. Sometimes the manufacturer may change pump designs which can affect actual current ratings.
12.4.1 Valve Valve is a special pump type that is most commonly selected when a solenoid valve is used to control flow to an output. This might be for the purpose of controlling either the flow of air or water. NOTE: In all Series 2 FW versions 3.00 and earlier when a valve turns on output 1 is also automatically turned on. This behavior is fixed and cannot be changed. The assumption is made that if you are using a solenoid it is to control flow and that output 1 has the primary pump (air or water) that will cause the flow to occur.
12.4.1.1 Valve Behavior The reference output that is turned on when a valve turns on can be configured to any available output on the series 2 controller. It is not longer fixed to only control output 1. To change the Valve Output Reference from the Main Menu select Parameter, then select Other Settings and then select the Valve Output Reference option:
40 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 296 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
From the list you can select any available Series 2 output as the reference output. In addition to this outputs individual settings (i.e. pulse/pause, parallel relay, etc.) this output will turn on if any output configured with a Mode Type of Valve is also on. NOTE: To maintain compatibility in FW upgrades to existing controllers the default setting is always output 1. Add contactor pump types
12.5 Min. Current and Max. Current The min. and max current fields allow you to specify the current draw range for a given output. If the current load is less than the min current or greater than the max current an alarm error will be generated.
13
OUTPUT DUPLEX / REDUNDANCY FEATURES
It is often desirable to have more than one pump available for critical pumping/supply applications. For example: If you have a single dosing pump and it fails the water level will continue to rise in the tank until someone is able to fix the pump or water supply to the tank can be stopped. In some situations it is impossible to get onsite quick enough (i.e. remote installations) and/or stop the flow of water to the system (i.e. multi-unit residential environments). As a result it is possible to use redundancy to setup a duplex pump configuration if you are using the Pulse/Pause mode. There are 2 ways in which you can configure a duplex system in the Pulse/Pause modes.
13.1 Per Day Duplex Cycling with Redundancy In a duplex configuration most commonly you configure 2 outputs for 2 identical pumps. You then configure each pump with the same configuration settings (i.e. mode, pulse/pause settings etc.) and then configure the weekday settings so that the 2 pumps alternate on a daily basis. For example: pump 1 is on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday and pump 2 is on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Then from the Redundancy menu you select the Master pump (i.e. output 1, or whatever output the primary pump is on) and the Slave pump (i.e. output 2, or whatever output the secondary pump is on). If either of the pumps fail due to a blown fuse or an over/undercurrent error the controller will automatically use the remaining good pump on all days activated in both the pumps weekday settings. Continuing with our example if pump 2 failed then pump 1 would run the pulse/pause cycles on all days of the week until pump 2 could be fixed and the error condition eliminated.
13.2 Per Cycle Duplex with Redundancy Sometimes cycling pumps on a daily basis does not meet some of the requirements of a given application. Take for example a treatment system in which there are two beds. The duplex pumps, each one connected to a separate bed, should dose each bed evenly each day. It is not desirable that one pump operates on one day and the other pump on the next because only one bed will be dosed each day. In this case it is more desirable to have per cycle duplex in which the pumps alternate on every pulse/pause cycle. In this configuration both beds are dosed evenly through-out the day, every day.
41 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 297 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
To configure per cycle duplex is very simple. In the pulse pause settings for the first output to be used in the duplex configuration set the Duplex Output parameter to the output to be used for the 2nd pump and save the settings. Then confirm the pump type, min current, max current etc. are properly configured for both outputs and you are done. There is no need to setup the Redundancy as was done in the per day duplex configuration. Redundancy is automatically built into the per cycle duplex functionality. For more information see section 12.3.2.1
14
SERIES 2 CONTROLLER INPUTS
14.1 Inputs 1 and 2 The Series 2 controller has 2 digital inputs which can be used for floats or any digital switch compatible with the 5V operating level provided by the input terminals.
15
Name
Input Type
Input 1
Digital
Input 2
Digital
Connector Terminals KL2-1 KL2-2 KL1-1 KL1-2
Description 5VDC Output 5VDC Input 5VDC Output 5VDC Input
ERROR CODES
Error Code
Description
Error Code
0
iNo Reports
39
Description eFC error
1
ePower breakdown
40
eSecurity Time High Load
2
eOutput 1: Fuse defective
41
eDry run filtration phase
3
eOutput 2: Fuse defective
42
eMax. pressure exceeded
4
eOutput 3: Fuse defective
43
eMax. temperature exceeded
5
eOutput 4: Fuse defective
44
eExt. EEPROM defective
6
eOutput 5: Fuse defective
45
eMax. depression exceeded
7
eOutput 6: Fuse defective
46
eGSM module error
8
eOutput 7: Fuse defective
47
iSystem startup
9
eOutput 8: Fuse defective
48
eMax filling time exceeded
10
eOutput 1: Undercurrent
49 - 64
Reserved
11
eOutput 2: Undercurrent
65
eReserved
12
eOutput 3: Undercurrent
66
iReports deleted
13
eOutput 4: Undercurrent
67
iFirmware updated
14
eOutput 5: Undercurrent
68
wWDT error
15
eOutput 6: Undercurrent
69
wDate/Time not set
16
eOutput 7: Undercurrent
70
iFactory reset
17
eOutput 8: Undercurrent
71
iDaylight saving time on
18
eOutput 1: Overcurrent
72
iDaylight saving time off
42 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 298 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
19
eOutput 2: Overcurrent
73
iClass D enabled
20
eOutput 3: Overcurrent
74
iClass D disabled
21
eOutput 4: Overcurrent
75
iMan. vacation mode enabled
22
eOutput 5: Overcurrent
76
iMan. vacation mode disabled
23
eOutput 6: Overcurrent
77
iMan. vacation mode started
24
eOutput 7: Overcurrent
78
iMan. vacation mode stopped
25
eOutput 8: Overcurrent
79
iAut. vacation mode started
26
eRTC defective
80
iAut. vacation mode stopped
27
eInt. EEPROM defective
81
iADAB started
28
eTank is empty
82
iClass HP enabled
29
eFlooding
83
iClass HP disabled
30
eMotor protection switch
84
wDry run backflush phase
31
eWrong polarity
85
iService mode (Manual)
32
eNo SIM-Card
86
iService mode (USB)
33
eSIM-Card locked
87
iService mode (Remote)
34
ePIN invalid
88
iInitiation mode started
35
eGSM module not available
89
iInitiation mode stopped
36
eGSM send error
90
iSludge removal started
37
eIO module not available
91
iSludge removal stopped
38
eFC not running
92
iError eliminated
16
CONFIGURING THE AIR PRESSURE SENSOR OUTPUT ERROR
The onboard air pressure sensor can be used to detect possible failures on air pressure lines from blowers and/or from valves connected to blowers. In this way it is possible to detect failures of the blower and/or any valves after which the air pressure sensor is connected. To configure the air pressure sensor: From the Main Menu select: Parameter, OK, Other Settings, OK, Air Pressure, OK. You should now be in the Airpressure sensor configuration menu
Select the Min. Airpressure setting and click OK to set the minimum air pressure that is acceptable. IMPORTANT: The air pressure values are in mbar, not PSI. To convert mbar to PSI just multiple the mBar number by 0. 0145037738.
43 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 299 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
IMPORTANT: If the Min. Airpressure value is very large you can press the up arrow button to reset the parameter to zero (0). IMPORTANT: The onboard air pressue sensor has a max pressure capability of 500 mbar (7.25PSI). Select Max. Airpressure seting and click OK to set the maximum air pressure that is acceptable. IMPORTANT: The air pressure values are in mbar, not PSI. To convert mbar to PSI just multiple the mBar number by 0. 0145037738. IMPORTANT: If the Max. Airpressure value is very large you can press the up arrow button to reset the parameter to zero (0). IMPORTANT: The onboard air pressue sensor has a max pressure capability of 500 mbar (7.25PSI). Select Ref. Pressuresensor to select the output which is associated with the min/max pressure levels being monitoring by the onboard pressure sensor. This reference output will be turned off if the min or max airpressure settings are exceeded. This behavior is identical to the min/max current parameters you have used for output current error detection.
17 WSB® SYSTEM RUNTIME PARAMETER SETTING GUIDELINES The total desired flow rates, and operation times are provided below for some common blower models and sludge return pump flows. The WSB® system settings must be adapted to the specific blowers and/or pumps used on any given installation. However, the settings below are provided as an example to illustrate the required aeration and sludge removal requirements for the various WSB® models. If a different blower or pump is used calculations must be performed to ensure that the required aeration or sludge return flows are met based on the specific blower/pump specifications.
17.1 Blower Settings (Output 1) output 1
Model
Litres Per Day (L/day)
day operation aeration
night operation
Blower
Qty
06:00 pulse
pause
pulse
pause
[type]
[-]
[Min]
[Min]
[Min]
23:59
00:00
05:59
operation per week
[Min]
[h]
WSB 400 WSB 500 WSB 600 WSB 750 WSB 1000 WSB 1250 WSB 1500 WSB 1600
1600 2000 2500 3000 3800 5000 5678 6300
HP-100 HP-100 HP-120 HP-120 HP-150 HP-200 HP-150 HP-150
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2
8.8 9.5 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 7.5 7.5
6.3 5.5 7.0 5.5 6.0 5.5 7.5 7.5
7.5 7.5 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
84 90 78 89 86 90 74 74
WSB 1800
7000
HP-150
2
8.0
7.0
8.0
23.0
78
44 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 300 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
17.2 Sludge Return Settings (Output 2) output 2 - PUMP Model
Litres Per Day (L/day)
Sludge Removal
operation time 6:00 23:59
Pump
Qty
pulse
pause
output 2 - AIR LIFT Removal per day
Sludge Removal
operation time 6:00 23:59
valve
Qty
pulse
pause
Removal per day
[L/min]
[-]
[sec]
[Min]
[L/d]
[L/min]
[-]
[sec]
[Min]
[L/d]
WSB 400
1600
144
1
7
60
315
12
1
22
15
317
WSB 500
2000
144
1
9
60
379
12
1
26
15
374
WSB 600
2500
144
1
12
60
505
12
1
35
15
504
WSB 750
3000
144
1
13
60
568
12
1
39
15
562
WSB 1000
3800
144
1
18
60
757
12
1
53
15
763
WSB 1250
5000
144
1
11.0
60.0
475
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
WSB 1500
5678
144
1
13.0
60.0
562
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
WSB 1600
6300
144
1
13.0
60.0
562
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
WSB 1800
7000
144
1
11.5
60.0
497
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
17.3 Sludge Return Settings (Output 4) Output 4 - Pump Model
Litres Per Day (L/day)
Sludge Removal Pump
operation time 6:00
23:59
Qty
pulse
pause
Removal per day
[L/min]
[-]
[sec]
[Min]
[L/d]
WSB 400 WSB 500 WSB 600 WSB 750 WSB 1000 WSB 1250 WSB 1500 WSB 1600
1600 2000 2500 3000 3800 5000 5678 6300
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 144 144 144
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 1 1
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11.0 13.0 13.0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 60.0 60.0 60.0
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 475 562 562
WSB 1800
7000
144
1
11.5
60.0
497
45 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 301 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
17.4 WSB® Phosphorus Precipitation Parameter Settings For systems which require phosphorus precipitation the followings settings provide the guideline for desired daily dosing. Again, the specific pump model must be considered to ensure the daily dosing is achieved based on each chemical pump models stroke and flow characteristics. NOTE: These numbers assume that the pump is operating in automatic mode (not controlled by external pulse logic) and the stroke length and ml/Stroke and Stroke Length configuration has been set to achieve the desired total daily dosing as outlined below.
Chem Pump
Qty
operation time 06:00 23:59 pulse pause
[type]
[-]
[sec]
[Min]
[mL/d]
WSB 400 WSB 500 WSB 600 WSB 750 WSB 1000 WSB 1250 WSB 1500 WSB 1600
Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus Concept plus
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 13 18 20 27 33 40 47
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
134 161 214 241 321 401 482 562
WSB 1800
Concept plus
1
54
30
642
Model
phosphorus precipitation
Dosing per day
18 IMPORTANT OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS To ensure the best performance of your WSB® clean wastewater treatment system: We recommend the following Do’s and Don’ts
18.1 Harmful Chemicals Do Not: Use or discard any of the following products in the sinks or toilets of your residence:
Caustic products used to unclog pipes (Mr. PlummerTM Dr. Plummer™, Drano Liquid™, etc.) Petroleum based products, paints, solvents etc. Pesticides Back Wash of a water softener system Large quantities of bleaching products Oil and grease (engine, cooking, etc.) Wax and resins Septic tank treatment products All non-biodegradable objects (cigarette buts, sanitary napkins, pads etc.)
46 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 302 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
18.2 Do Not Please respect manufacturer’s recommendations for usage of domestic cleaning products and follow the do’s and don’ts outlined below to ensure proper operation of your system. Failure to follow these guidelines can result in failure of your system:
Do not use automatic toilet cleaners Do not use a waste disposal unit in the sink (in-sink-erator) Do not connect downspouts or storm drains or allow surface water to drain into the system Do not enter an access riser – gases can be deadly and lack of oxygen could be fatal Do not use special additives designed to ‘increase the performance of your system’ Do not plant trees or shrubs too close to the system lids or disposal bed Do not leave interior faucets on to reduce chances of freezing – use insulation to ensure freezing cannot occur Do not bury your access openings (lids) Do not drive over or near your system or bed
WARNING:
Only authorized service personnel are to remove access covers on the WSB® system. Removal by unauthorized personnel may result in death or bodily injury from potentially hazardous gases and waste matter. Please ensure easy access to covers at all times for inspection and/or emergency
18.3 Best Practices The following Best Practices are very important to ensuring proper operation of your system. Following these requirements will help to ensure years of hastle free operation of your WSB System DO:
Familiarize yourself with the location of your system and controls As a reference, keep a copy of the layout of your system Ensure water is diverted away from your disposal bed Budget to pump your tank on a regular basis (recommended between 2-5 years) Repair any leaking plumbing fixtures as soon as possible Replace old toilets with low flush or dual flush toilets Clean the lint filter on the washing machine on a regular basis Keep the access lids accessible and brought to grade at all times File the system maintenance cards (and service calls) to help keep accurate records Try to reduce the amount of wastewater that your system needs to treat (install high efficiency water saving products wherever possible) Use your garbage can to dispose of substances that can be harmful to your treatment system Collect grease in a container and dispose with your trash Conserve water and repair leaky toilets in order to not hydraulically overload your system
19 WSB® CLEAN SYSTEM SERVICE POLICY All WSB® lean NSF/ANSI Standard 40, Class 1 certified wastewater treatment systems have an initial 2 year service agreement (two calls per year) included with the system’s initial purchase price. To find out who the service provider for your system is please refer to the labels on the main control panel.
47 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 303 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
19.1 Extended Service Policy An Extended Service Policy is available and may be purchased through RH2O North America. The extended service policy will provide you with the same piece of mind as the initial service policy included with the system and will ensure that your system is properly maintained and serviced in the event of a failure.
48 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 304 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
20 LIMITED WARRANTY
Preamble RH2O North America Inc. (hereinafter called “RH2O”) is proud to offer its customers with the following warranty. For the purposes of this Warranty Certificate, the term “Customer” shall mean the person(s) who are the owner(s) of the property where a WSB® clean system is installed and the term “Successors” means any other person entitled to exercise the customer’s rights.
Nature of the Warranty The purchase of a WSB® clean system includes a free inspection of all components during the first year following installation by an authorized representative of RH2O. All of the WSB® clean system components are warranted for a period of two years from the installation date. RH2O warrants the non-deterioration of its media for a period of twenty years, from the installation date. Components repaired or replaced under the two year warranty will be covered under warranty up to the end of the original two year warranty period.
Notification Obligations The WSB® clean system includes an alarm system which works in conjunction with the control panel for the system. The control panel detects any problems related to the system and will sound the alarm. If the alarm goes off, the customer must immediately contact RH2O by written notification. The customer must also notify RH2O of any apparent anomaly, irregularity, and/or malfunction of the WSB® clean system. Failure to due do so within a reasonable timeframe may result in this Warranty Certificate becoming null and void. The Customer must provide access to the system at all times to RH2O or its representative.
Exclusions The following damages or problems are excluded from the Warranty: (a) Any damage or problem caused by an unexpected event or “Act-ofGod”, such as, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing: earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, landslides, explosions (b) Any damage or problem caused by the fault or act of a third party; (c) Any damage or problem arising from any modification, correction or addition carried out by a person not authorized by RH2O or without its approval; (d) Any damage or problem, if it is proven that the WSB® clean system was not used according to the terms and conditions stipulated in the Owners Manual; (e) Any damage or problem, if it is proven that the system was not used and maintained in compliance with the existing regulations; (f) Any damage or problem, caused by fault or action of the Customer or the Customer’s Successors including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, refusal to allow access to the system for inspection purposes.
Particular Exclusions It is further expressly understood that the Customer may not carry out or cause to be carried out any repair, maintenance and/or verification of the purchased WSB® clean system, or attempt to carry out any work whatsoever or to apply any corrective measures whatsoever to the aforementioned systems (except for periodic pumping of the sludge) without written consent from RH2O. Failure to do so 49 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 305 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
may result in this warranty becoming null and void. 6. Indemnities and Damages The liability and obligations of RH2O under this Warranty Certificate for corrective measures and/or means of correcting any problems, of which it is duly advised, shall be limited to the replacement of any component of the WSB® clean system, in compliance with sections 3 and 4 herein. 7. Damage Limitations RH2O may in no way be held liable for any other damage sustained by the Customer. RH2O compensation or indemnification obligation shall be limited to the provisions under section 6 of this Warranty Certificate. RH2O does not assume any liability for personal injury or property damage caused by the use or misuse of the WSB® clean system. RH2O shall not, in any event, be liable for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages. RH2O liability shall, in all instances, be limited to the provisions under section 6 of this Warranty Certificate and will end upon expiration of the applicable Warranty Certification period. 8. Ownership Transfer In the event of transfer of ownership, sale, reassignment or disposition in any other way of the Customer’s property to a third party, this Warranty Certificate shall continue to apply on the express condition that the new owner confirms in writing to RH2O that he is the new owner of the property, is cognizant of the Warranty Certificate and accepts its terms and conditions. The Customer agrees to forward, to the buyer or the buyers successors, the Warranty Certificate, as well
as the Owner’s Manual. The Customer’s Successors must complete the Ownership Transfer Form and return it to RH2O in order for the ownership transfer to be complete and the Warranty Certificate to be valid. 9. Inspection The Customer or the Customer’s Successors shall allow RH2O or its duly authorized representative to perform all necessary monitoring and/or inspection measures, when deemed necessary, for the assessment and validly of this Warranty Certificate. If the Customer or Customers Successors notify RH2O of an alleged defect or malfunction of the WSB® clean and that after inspection, it is found that no such defect or malfunction is revealed, or, that the warranty is excluded or doesn’t apply, a minimum charge of $100.00 plus direct expenses will be invoiced for the cost of such inspection. 10. Interpretation The terms of this Warranty Certificate shall be interpreted and governed by the law in force in the Province of Ontario and the provisions of this Warranty. 11. Priority of the Warranty Certificate This warranty supersedes any contract or understanding, written or verbal, entered into between the Customer and RH2O. In case of any contradiction between this warranty and other documents issued by RH2O, this warranty shall prevail. 12. Jurisdiction The parties acknowledge that any litigation regarding the present Warranty Certificate must be introduced in the judicial district of Toronto, Ontario.
50 | Page RES-WSB-OMS Version 1.0
Page 306 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
NOTES
51 | Page RES-WSB-OM Version 1.0
Page 307 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water Washington, D.C.
EPA 832-F-00-016 September 2000
Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Package Plants DESCRIPTION Package plants are pre-manufactured treatment facilities used to treat wastewater in small communities or on individual properties. According to manufacturers, package plants can be designed to treat flows as low as 0.002 MGD or as high as 0.5 MGD, although they more commonly treat flows between 0.01 and 0.25 MGD (Metcalf and Eddy, 1991). The most common types of package plants are extended aeration plants, sequencing batch reactors, oxidation ditches, contact stabilization plants, rotating biological contactors, and physical/chemical processes (Metcalf and Eddy, 1991). This fact sheet focuses on the first three, all of which are biological aeration processes. Extended aeration plants The extended aeration process is one modification of the activated sludge process which provides biological treatment for the removal of biodegradable organic wastes under aerobic conditions. Air may be supplied by mechanical or diffused aeration to provide the oxygen required to sustain the aerobic biological process. Mixing must be provided by aeration or mechanical means to maintain the microbial organisms in contact with the dissolved organics. In addition, the pH must be controlled to optimize the biological process and essential nutrients must be present to facilitate biological growth and the continuation of biological degradation. As depicted in Figure 1, wastewater enters the treatment system and is typically screened
To Solids Handling, Disposal, or Beneficial Reuse
Digestion Return Activated Sludge (RAS)
Waste Activated Sludge (WAS)
Influent
Effluent Flow Screening/ Grinding Equalization (if required)
Extended Aeration
Clarification
Disinfection
Source: Parsons Engineering Science, 2000.
FIGURE 1 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FOR A TYPICAL EXTENDED AERATION PLANT immediately to remove large suspended, settleable, or floating solids that could interfere with or damage equipment downstream in the process. Wastewater may then pass through a grinder to reduce large particles that are not captured in the screening process. If the plant requires the flow to be regulated, the effluent will then flow into equalization basins which regulate peak wastewater flow rates. Wastewater then enters the aeration chamber, where it is mixed and oxygen is provided to the microorganisms. The mixed liquor then flows to a clarifier or settling chamber where most microorganisms settle to the bottom of the clarifier and a portion are pumped back to the incoming wastewater at the beginning of the plant. This returned material is the return activated sludge (RAS). The material that is not returned, the waste activated sludge (WAS), is removed for treatment and disposal. The clarified wastewater then flows over a weir and into a collection channel before being diverted to the disinfection system.
Page 308 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Extended aeration package plants consist of a steel tank that is compartmentalized into flow equalization, aeration, clarification, disinfection, and aerated sludge holding/digestion segments. Extended aeration systems are typically manufactured to treat wastewater flow rates between 0.002 to 0.1 MGD. Use of concrete tanks may be preferable for larger sizes (Sloan, 1999). Extended aeration plants are usually started up using “seed sludge” from another sewage plant. It may take as many as two to four weeks from the time it is seeded for the plant to stabilize (Sloan, 1999).
phases within the SBR to achieve the desired effluent concentration. The sludge that is wasted from the SBR moves on to digestion and eventually to solids handling, disposal, or beneficial reuse. The treated effluent then moves to disinfection. An equalization tank is typically needed before the disinfection unit in batch SBRs in order to store large volumes of water. If the flow is not equalized, a sizable filter may be necessary to accommodate the large flow of water entering the disinfection system. In addition, SBR systems typically have no primary or secondary clarifiers as settling takes place in the SBR. To Solids Handling, Disposal, or Beneficial Reuse
Sequencing batch reactors A sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is a variation of the activated sludge process. As a fill and draw or batch process, all biological treatment phases occur in a single tank. This differs from the conventional flow through activated sludge process in that SBRs do not require separate tanks for aeration and sedimentation (Kappe, 1999). SBR systems contain either two or more reactor tanks that are operated in parallel, or one equalization tank and one reactor tank. The type of tank used depends on the wastewater flow characteristics (e.g. high or low volume). While this setup allows the system to accommodate continuous influent flow, it does not provide for disinfection or holding for aerated sludge. There are many types of SBR systems, including continuous influent/time based, non-continuous influent/time based, volume based, an intermittent cycle system (a SBR that utilizes jet aeration), and various other system modifications based on different manufacturer designs. The type of SBR system used depends on site and wastewater characteristics as well as the needs of the area or community installing the unit. Package SBRs are typically manufactured to treat wastewater flow rates between 0.01 and 0.2 MGD; although flow rates can vary based on the system and manufacturer. As seen in Figure 2, the influent flow first goes through a screening process before entering the SBR. The waste is then treated in a series of batch
Digestion
Effluent
Influent Screening/ Grinding
SBR
Disinfection
Source: Parsons Engineering Science, 2000.
FIGURE 2 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FOR A TYPICAL SBR There are normally five phases in the SBR treatment cycle: fill, react, settle, decant, and idle. The length of time that each phase occurs is controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC), which allows the system to be controlled from remote locations (Sloan, 1999). In the fill phase, raw wastewater enters the basin, where it is mixed with settled biomass from the previous cycle. Some aeration may occur during this phase. Then, in the react phase, the basin is aerated, allowing oxidation and nitrification to occur. During the settling phase, aeration and mixing are suspended and the solids are allowed to settle. The treated wastewater is then discharged from the basin in the decant phase. In the final phase, the basin is idle as it waits for the start of the next cycle. During this time, part of the solids are removed from the basin and disposed of as waste sludge (Kappe, 1999). Figure 3 shows this sequence of operation in an SBR.
Page 309 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Mixed Fill Influent
React Fill
Decant
Influent
Mixer
Decanter
Air On Effluent Discharge
Wasted Sludge
Settle
React
wastewater is aerated with mechanical surface or submersible aerators (depending on manufacturer design) that propel the mixed liquor around the channel at velocities high enough to prevent solids deposition. The aerator ensures that there is sufficient oxygen in the fluid for the microbes and adequate mixing to ensure constant contact between the organisms and the food supply (Lakeside, 1999).
Air On To Solids Handling, Disposal, or Beneficial Reuse Waste Activated Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Sludge (WAS) Digestion
Source: CASS Water Engineering, Inc., 2000.
FIGURE 3 SBR SEQUENCE OF OPERATION Sludge wasting is an important step in the SBR process and largely affects system performance. It is not considered a basic phase since the sludge is not wasted at a specific time period during the cycle. The quantity and rate of wasting is determined by performance requirements. An SBR system does not require an RAS system, as both aeration and settling occur in the same tank. This prevents any sludge from being lost during the react step and eliminates the need to return sludge from the clarifier to the aeration chamber (Metcalf and Eddy, 1991). Oxidation ditches An oxidation ditch, a modified form of the activated sludge process, is an aerated, long term, complete mix process. Many systems are designed to operate as extended aeration systems. Typical oxidation ditch treatment systems consist of a single or multi-channel configuration within a ring, oval, or horseshoe-shaped basin. Horizontally or vertically mounted aerators provide aeration, circulation, and oxygen transfer in the ditch. Package oxidation ditches are typically manufactured in sizes that treat wastewater flow rates between 0.01 and 0.5 MGD. As seen in Figure 4, raw wastewater is first screened before entering the oxidation ditch. Depending on the system size and manufacturer type, a grit chamber may be required. Once inside the ditch, the
Influent
Effluent Screening/ Grinding
Oxidation Ditch
Clarification
Disinfection
Source: Parsons Engineering Science, 1999.
FIGURE 4 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FOR A TYPICAL OXIDATION DITCH Oxidation ditches tend to operate in an extended aeration mode consisting of long hydraulic and solids retention times which allow more organic matter to break down. Treated sewage moves to the settling tank or final clarifier, where the biosolids and water separate. Wastewater then moves to other treatment processes while sludge is removed. Part of it is returned to the ditch as RAS, while the rest is removed from the process as the waste activated sludge (WAS). WAS is wasted either continuously or daily and must be stabilized prior to disposal or beneficial reuse. APPLICABILITY In general, package treatment plants are applicable for areas with a limited number of people and small wastewater flows. They are most often used in remote locations such as trailer parks, highway rest areas, and rural areas. Extended aeration plants Extended aeration package plants are typically used in small municipalities, suburban subdivisions, apartment complexes, highway rest areas, trailer
Page 310 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
parks, small institutions, and other sites where flow rates are below 0.1 MGD. These systems are also useful for areas requiring nitrification. Sequencing batch reactors Package plant SBRs are suitable for areas with little land, stringent treatment requirements, and small wastewater flows. More specifically, SBRs are appropriate for RV parks or mobile homes, campgrounds, construction sites, rural schools, hotels, and other small applications. These systems are also useful for treating pharmaceutical, brewery, dairy, pulp and paper, and chemical wastes. While constant cycles with time-fixed process phases are sufficient in most cases, phases should be individually adapted and optimized for each plant. SBRs are also suited for sites that need minimal operator attendance and that have a wide range of inflow and/or organic loadings. Industries with high BOD loadings, such as chemical or food processing plants, will find SBRs useful for treating wastewater. These systems are also suitable for facilities requiring nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorous removal. Most significantly, SBRs are applicable for areas where effluent requirements can change frequently and become stricter, as these systems have tremendous flexibility to change treatment options. However, part of the economic advantage of the SBR process is lost when advanced treatment processes must be added downstream since intermediate equalization is normally required. Oxidation ditches Oxidation ditches are suitable for facilities that require nutrient removal, have limitations due to the nature of the site, or want a biological system that saves energy with limited use of chemicals unless required for further treatment. Oxidation ditch technology can be used to treat any type of wastewater that is responsive to aerobic degradation. In addition, systems can be designed for denitrification and phosphorous removal. Types of industries utilizing oxidation ditches include: food processing, meat and poultry packing, breweries, pharmaceutical, milk processing,
petrochemical, and numerous other types. Oxidation ditches are particularly useful for schools, small industries, housing developments, and small communities. Ultimately, this technology is most applicable for places that have a large amount of land available. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES Some advantages and disadvantages of package plants are listed below. Extended aeration plants Advantages C Plants are easy to operate, as many are manned for a maximum of two or three hours per day. C Extended aeration processes are often better at handling organic loading and flow fluctuations, as there is a greater detention time for the nutrients to be assimilated by microbes. C Systems are easy to install, as they are shipped in one or two pieces and then mounted on an onsite concrete pad, above or below grade. C Systems are odor free, can be installed in most locations, have a relatively small footprint, and can be landscaped to match the surrounding area. C Extended aeration systems have a relatively low sludge yield due to long sludge ages, can be designed to provide nitrification, and do not require a primary clarifier. Disadvantages C Extended aeration plants do not achieve denitrification or phosphorus removal without additional unit processes. C Flexibility is limited to adapt to changing effluent requirements resulting from regulatory changes. C A longer aeration period requires more energy.
Page 311 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
C Systems require a larger amount of space and tankage than other “higher rate” processes, which have shorter aeration detention times.
C Post equalization may be required where more treatment is needed. C Sludge must be disposed frequently.
Sequencing batch reactors C Specific energy consumption is high. Advantages Oxidation ditches C SBRs can consistently perform nitrification as well as denitrification and phosphorous removal. C SBRs have large operational flexibility. C The ability to control substrate tension within the system allows for optimization of treatment efficiency and control over nitrogen removal, filamentous organisms, and the overall stability of the process. C Since all the unit processes are operated in a single tank, there is no need to optimize aeration and decanting to comply with power requirements and lower decant discharge rates. C Sludge bulking is not a problem. C Significant reductions in nitrate nitrogen can occur by incorporating an anoxic cycle in the system. C SBRs have little operation and maintenance problems. C Systems require less space than extended aeration plants of equal capacity. C SBRs can be manned part time from remote locations, and operational changes can be made easily. C The system allows for automatic and positive control of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration and solids retention time (SRT) through the use of sludge wasting. Disadvantages
Advantages C Systems are well-suited for treating typical domestic waste, have moderate energy requirements, and work effectively under most types of weather. C Oxidation ditches provide an inexpensive wastewater treatment option with both low operation and maintenance costs and operational needs. C Systems can be used with or without clarifiers, which affects flexibility and cost. C Systems consistently provide high quality effluent in terms of TSS, BOD, and ammonia levels. C Oxidation ditches have a relatively low sludge yield, require a moderate amount of operator skill, and are capable of handling shock and hydraulic loadings. Disadvantages C Oxidation ditches can be noisy due to mixer/aeration equipment, and tend to produce odors when not operated correctly. C Biological treatment is unable to treat highly toxic waste streams. C Systems have a relatively large footprint. C Systems have less flexibility should regulations for effluent requirements change.
C It is hard to adjust the cycle times for small communities.
Page 312 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
DESIGN CRITERIA Table 1 lists typical design parameters for extended aeration plants, SBRS, and oxidation ditches. TABLE 1 TYPICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR PACKAGE PLANTS Extended Aeration
SBR
Oxidation Ditch
BOD5 loading (F:M) (lb BOD5/ lb MLVSS)
0.05 - 0.15
0.05 0.30
0.05 - 0 30
Oxygen Required Avg. at 20E EC (lb/lb BOD5 applied)
2-3
2-3
2-3
Oxygen Required Peak at 20E EC (value x avg. flow)
1.5 - 2.0
1.25 2.0
1.5 - 2.0
MLSS (mg/L)
3000 -6000
1500 -5000
3000 -6000
Detention Time (hours)
18 - 36
16 36
18 - 36
Volumetric Loading (lb BOD5/d/ 103 cu ft)
10 - 25
5 - 15
5 - 30
Source: Adapted from Metcalf and Eddy, 1991 and WEF, 1998.
Extended aeration plants Package extended aeration plants are typically constructed from steel or concrete. If the system is small enough, the entire system will arrive as one unit that is ready to be installed. If the system is larger, the clarifier, aeration chamber, and chlorine tank are delivered as separate units, which are then assembled on-site (WEF, 1985). Key internal components of extended aeration treatment plants consist of the following: transfer pumps to move wastewater between the equalization and aeration zones; a bar screen and/or grinder to decrease the size of large solids; an
aeration system consisting of blowers and diffusers for the equalization, aeration, and sludge holding zones; an airlift pump for returning sludge; a skimmer and effluent weir for the clarifier; and UV, liquid hypochlorite, or tablet modules used in the disinfection zone. Blowers and the control panel containing switches, lights, and motor starters are typically attached to either the top or one side of the package plant (Sloan, 1999). Biological organisms within the system need sufficient contact time with the organic material in order to produce effluent of an acceptable quality. Typical contact time for extended aeration package plants is approximately 18-24 hours. The contact time, daily flow rate, influent parameters, and effluent parameters determine the size of the aeration tank where air is used to mix wastewater and to supply oxygen to promote biological growth. A package extended aeration system is sized based on the average volume of wastewater produced within a twenty-four hour period. Although provisions are made for some peaking factor, a flow equalization system may be necessary to prevent overloading of the system from inconsistent flow rates in the morning and evening. Equalization allows the wastewater to be delivered to the treatment plant at more manageable flow rates (WEF, 1985). Systems should be installed at sites where wastewater collection is possible by gravity flow. In addition, the site should be stable, well drained, and not prone to flooding. The facility should be installed at least 30 meters (100 feet) from all residential areas and be in accordance with all health department regulations or zoning restrictions (WEF, 1985). In order to ensure ease of operation and maintenance, extended aeration systems should be installed so that the tank walls extend nearly 0.15 meters (6 inches) above ground. This will supply insulation in the winter, prevent surface runoff from infiltrating the system, and allow the system to be serviced readily. If a plant is installed below ground, it must have distinct diversion ditching or extension walls in order to prevent surface water infiltration into the plant. When the plant is installed completely above ground, it may be
Page 313 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
necessary to provide insulation for cold weather and walkways for easy maintenance (WEF, 1985). Sequencing batch reactors Important internal components include an aeration system, which typically consists of diffusers and a blower; a floating mixer; an effluent decanter; a pump for withdrawing sludge; and a sequence of liquid level floats. The PLC and the control panel are usually positioned within a nearby control building (Sloan, 1999). When the wastewater flow rate at the site is less than 0.05 MGD, a single, prefabricated steel tank can be used. This tank is divided into one SBR basin, one aerobic sludge digester, and one influent pump well. Concrete tanks may also be used, but in North America are not as cost effective as steel for small systems. If the plant must be able to treat 0.1 to 1.5 MGD, multiple concrete SBR basins are commonly used (CASS, 1999). The design of SBR systems can be based on carbonaceous BOD removal only or both carbonaceous and nitrogenous BOD removal. The system can be expanded to achieve optimum nitrification and carbonaceous removal by operating primarily in an oxic state with few anoxic periods such as during settle and decant. Denitrification and biological phosphorous removal can be promoted by providing adequate anoxic periods after intense aerobic cycles. This allows DO to be dissipated and nitrate to be used by the consuming organism and released as elemental nitrogen. By introducing an anaerobic process after the anoxic process, bacteria conducive to excess phosphorous uptake will develop. Phosphorous will be released in the anaerobic phase, but additional phosphorous is incorporated into the cell mass during subsequent aerobic cycles. Since the excess phosphorous is incorporated in the cell mass, cell wastage must be practiced to achieve a net phosphorous removal. Anaerobic conditions should be avoided in treating the waste sludge since they may result in the release of the phosphorous. A low food to microorganism (F:M) ratio SBR system designed for an average municipal flow
pattern will usually have an operating cycle duration of four hours, or six cycles per day. For a two reactor system, there will be twelve cycles per day and for a four reactor system, twenty-four cycles per day. The distribution and number of cycles per day can be adjusted based on specific treatment requirements or to accommodate alternate inflow patterns. Cycle sequences are time controlled with sufficient volume provided to handle design flow rates. If incoming flow is significantly less than the design flow, only a portion of the reactor capacity is utilized and aeration time periods can be reduced to save energy and prevent over aeration. If flow rates are greater than usual resulting from storm runoff, the control system detects the high rise in the reactor and modifies the cycle to integrate peak flow rates. This will shorten the aeration, settle, and decant sequences, minimize the anoxic sequence (if supplied), and provide more cycles per day. As a result, hydraulic surges are incorporated and the diluted wastewater is processed in less time. In order to make the above optimizations, the logic control must be provided by the PLC (Kappe, 1999). Small SBRs can experience a variety of problems associated with operation, maintenance, and loadings. Therefore, more conservative design criteria are typically used due to the wide range of organic and hydraulic loads generated from small communities. This type of design utilizes a lower F:M ratio and longer hydraulic retention time (HRT) and SRT (CASS, 1999). Oxidation ditches Key components of a typical oxidation ditch include a screening device, an influent distributor (with some systems), a basin or channel, aeration devices (mechanical aerators, jet mixers, or diffusers, depending on the manufacturer), a settling tank or final clarifier (with some systems), and an RAS system (with some systems). Typically, the basin and the clarifier are individually sized to meet the specific requirements of each facility. These components are often built to share a common wall in order to reduce costs and save space (Lakeside, 1999).
Page 314 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Concrete tanks are typically used when installing package plant oxidation ditches. This results in lower maintenance costs as concrete tanks do not require periodic repainting or sand blasting. Fabricated steel or a combination of steel and concrete can also be used for construction, depending on site conditions (Lakeside, 1999). The volume of the oxidation ditch is determined based on influent wastewater characteristics, effluent discharge requirements, HRT, SRT, temperature, mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), and pH. It may be necessary to include other site specific parameters to design the oxidation ditch as well. Some oxidation ditches do not initially require clarifiers, but can later be upgraded and expanded by adding clarifiers, changing the type of process used, or adding additional ditches (Kruger, 1999). PERFORMANCE The performance of package plants in general can be affected by various operational and design issues (Metcalf and Eddy, 1991). C Large and sudden temperature changes C Removal efficiency of grease and scum from the primary clarifier (except with oxidation ditches that do not use primary clarifiers) C Incredibly small flows that make designing selfcleansing conduits and channels difficult C Fluctuations in flow, BOD5 loading, and other influent parameters C Hydraulic shock loads, or the large fluctuations in flow from small communities
extended aeration systems result in effluent with < 15 mg/L BOD and < 10 mg/L TSS. TABLE 2 EXTENDED AERATION PERFORMANCE Typical Effluent Quality
Aldie WWTP (monthly average)
BOD (mg/L)
< 30 or <10
5
TSS (mg/L)
< 30 or <10
17
TP (mg/L)
< 2*
**
NH3-N (mg/L)
<2
**
- May require chemicals to achieve. ** DEQ does not require monitoring of these parameters. Source: Sloan, 1999 and Broderick, 1999.
Aldie Wastewater Treatment Plant The Aldie Wastewater Treatment Plant, located in Aldie, Virginia, is an extended aeration facility which treats an average of 0.0031 MGD with a design flow of 0.015 MGD. This technology was chosen because it would allow the area to meet permit requirements while minimizing land use. The plant consists of an influent chamber which directs the flow to two parallel aeration basins, parallel clarifiers, and a UV disinfection system. Sequencing batch reactors The treatment performance of package plant SBRs is largely influenced by the plant operator. While the process requires little assistance, training programs are available to teach operators how to become skilled with small plant operations. SBRs perform well, often matching the removal efficiency of extended aeration processes. Systems can typically achieve the effluent limitations listed in Table 3.
C Sufficient control of the air supply rate Extended aeration plants Extended aeration plants typically perform extremely well and achieve effluent quality as seen in Table 2. If chemical precipitation is used, total phosphorous (TP) can be < 2 mg/L. In some cases,
In addition, SBR systems have demonstrated a greater removal efficiency of carbonaceous BOD than other systems due to optimization of microbial activity via anoxic stress and better utilization of applied oxygen in the cyclic system. The system can consistently provide carbonaceous BOD effluent levels of 10 mg/L.
Page 315 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
TABLE 3 SBR PERFORMANCE Typical Effluent
TABLE 4 OXIDATION DITCH PERFORMANCE Typical Effluent Quality
Harrah WWTP % Removal
Effluent
BOD (mg/L)
10
98
3
TSS (mg/L)
10
98
3
NH3 (mg/L)
<1
97
0.6
Source: Sloan, 1999 and Reynolds, 1999.
Harrah Wastewater Treatment Plant The Harrah wastewater treatment plant in Oklahoma treats an average wastewater flow of 0.223 MGD. The SBR has achieved tertiary effluent quality without filtration from the time it was first installed. Pretreatment involves an aerated grit chamber and comminutor. Waste activated sludge is taken to a settling pond where the settled sludge is dredged annually. A nitrogen removal study performed for nine months confirmed that nitrification and denitrification occur consistently without special operator care. Oxidation Ditches Although the manufacturer’s design may vary, most oxidation ditches typically achieve the effluent limitations listed in Table 4. With modifications, some oxidation ditches can achieve TN removal to
5 mg/L and TP removal with biological means.
City of Ocoee Wastewater Treatment Plant Currently, the wastewater treatment plant in Ocoee, Florida accepts an average flow of 1.1 to 1.2 MGD. The city chose to use an oxidation ditch because it was an easy technology for the plant staff to understand and implement. The facility is also designed for denitrification without the use of chemical additives. Nitrate levels consistently test at 0.8 to 1.0 mg/L with limits of 12 mg/L (Holland, 1999). Table 4 indicates how well the Ocoee oxidation ditch performs.
Ocoee WWTP
With 2° Clarifier
With Filter
% Removal
Effluent
CBOD (mg/L)
#10
5
97
4.8
TSS (mg/L)
#10
5
97
0.32
TP (mg/L)
2
1
NA
NA
N-NO3 (mg/L)
NA
NA
95
0.25
Note: 2° = secondary. NA = not available. Source: Kruger, 1999 and Holland, 1999.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Operation requirements will vary depending on state requirements for manning package treatment systems. Manning requirements for these systems may typically be less then eight hours a day. Each type of system has additional operational procedures that should be followed to keep the system running properly. Owners of these systems must be sure to follow all manufacturer’s recommendations for routine and preventative maintenance requirements. Each owner should check with the manufacturer to determine essential operation and maintenance (O&M) requirements. Depending on state requirements, most systems must submit regular reports to local agencies. In addition, system operators must make safety a primary concern. Wastewater treatment manuals and federal and state regulations should be checked to ensure safe operation of these systems. Extended aeration plants Operational procedures for these systems consist of performing fecal coliform tests on the effluent to ensure adequate disinfection and making periodic
Page 316 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
inspections on dissolved oxygen levels (DO) and MLSS concentrations in the aeration compartment. Sludge-volume index (SVI) tests in the clarifier must also be performed to determine how well the sludge is settling. Other sampling and analyses will be required on the effluent in accordance with state regulations. Typical maintenance steps for extended aeration systems include checking motors, gears, blowers, and pumps to ensure proper lubrication and operation. Routine inspection of equipment is also recommended to ensure proper operation. Check with the manufacturer for specific O&M requirements. Sequencing batch reactors To ensure proper functioning of the system, O&M must be provided for several pieces of equipment. Operational procedures include sampling and monitoring of DO, pH, and MLSS levels. Additional sampling and analyses on the effluent will be required based on state regulations. Maintenance requirements include regular servicing of aeration blowers, which is usually performed when greasing is done, and monthly inspection of belts on the blowers to determine if they need to be adjusted or replaced. Submersible pumps require routine inspections and servicing as required by the manufacturer. The decanter will require monthly greasing. Additional O&M may be required depending on system requirements. Check with the manufacturer for specific maintenance requirements. Oxidation ditches Depending on the manufacturer’s design, typical operational procedures for oxidation ditches include monitoring of DO, pH, MLSS, and various other types of sampling and analyses. Maintenance steps include periodically inspecting the aerator, regularly greasing rotors, and following manufacturer recommendations for maintenance of the pumps. Operators should follow all manufacturer recommendations for operation and maintenance of the equipment.
COSTS Costs are site specific and generally depend on flow rate, influent wastewater characteristics, effluent discharge requirements, additional required equipment, solids handling equipment, and other site specific conditions. Manufacturers should be contacted for specific cost information. Extended aeration plants As provided by Aeration Products, Inc., smaller extended aeration package plants designed to treat less than 0.02 MGD cost approximately $4 to $6 per gallon of water treated, based on capital costs. For larger plants, capital costs will be approximately between $2 to $2.50 per gallon of wastewater treated. Maintenance processes for these plants are labor-intensive and require semi-skilled personnel, and are usually completed through routine contract services. Maintenance cost averages $350 per year. Table 5 provides the cost estimates for various extended aeration packages. These costs include the entire package plant, as well as a filtration unit. TABLE 5 COST ESTIMATES FOR EXTENDED AERATION Flow (MGD)
Estimated Budget Cost per Gallon ($)
0.015
9-11
0.04
7
1.0
1.3
Note: Larger flow rates are available from the manufacturer. Estimated cost per gallon was determined based on the mid-flow range. Source: Parsons Engineering Science, 1999.
Sequencing batch reactors The capital cost per capita for small SBR plants is greater than for large SBR plants. Approximate equipment costs disregarding concrete or steel tanks costs are provided in Table 6. Operation energy costs are likely to be higher for small SBR plants than for larger plants as a result of numerous loadings.
Page 317 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
TABLE 6 COST ESTIMATES FOR SBRs
Flow (MGD)
TABLE 7 COST ESTIMATES FOR OXIDATION DITCHES
Estimated Budget Cost per Gallon ($)
0.01
4-5
0.05
2
0.2
0.7
1.0
0.25
Flow Range (MGD)
Budget Price ($)
Estimated Budget Cost per Gallon ($)
0 - 0.03
80,000
5.33
0.03 - 0.06
91,000
2.02
0.06 - 1.1
97,500
0.17
1.1 - 1.7
106,000
0.08
1.7 - 2.5
114,700
0.05
Note: Larger flow rates are available from the manufacturer. Estimated cost per gallon was determined based on the mid-flow range. Source: CASS, 1999.
System costs will vary, depending on the specific job. Factors influencing cost include average and peak flow, tank type, type of aeration system used, effluent requirements, and site constraints. Operation and maintenance costs are site specific and may range from $800 to $2,000 dollars per million gallons treated. Labor and maintenance requirements may be reduced in SBRs because clarifiers and RAS pumps may not be necessary. On the other hand, maintenance requirements for the more sophisticated valves and switches associated with SBRs may be more costly than for other systems.
Note: Larger flow rates are available from the manufacturer. Estimated cost per gallon was determined based on the mid-flow range. Source: Lakeside, 1999.
Oxidation Ditches EPA 832-F-00-013 September 2000 Aerobic Treatment EPA 832-F-00-031 September 2000 Other EPA Fact Sheets can be found at the following web address: http://www.epa.gov/owmitnet/mtbfact.htm
Oxidation ditches Table 7 lists budget cost estimates for various sizes of oxidation ditches. Operation and maintenance costs for oxidation ditches are significantly lower than other secondary treatment processes. In comparison to other treatment technologies, energy requirements are low, operator attention is minimal, and chemical addition is not required.
Broderick, T., 1999. Aldie Wastewater Treatment Plant, Aldie, Virginia. Personal communication with Dacia Mosso, Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
CASS Water Engineering, Inc., 2000. Literature provided by manufacturer.
Crites, R. and G. Tchobanoglous, 1998. Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. WCB McGraw-Hill, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts.
Holland, R, 1999. City of Ocoee Wastewater Treatment Plant, Ocoee, Florida. Personal communication with Dacia Mosso, Parsons Engineering Science, Inc.
REFERENCES Other Related Fact Sheets Sequencing Batch Reactors EPA 932-F-99-073 September 1999
Page 318 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Hydro-Aerobics, July 1999. provided by manufacturer.
Literature
Kappe Associates Engineered Systems, Frederick, Maryland, 1999. Literature provided by distributor.
Kruger, July 1999. Literature provided by manufacturer.
Lakeside, July 1999. Literature provided by manufacturer.
Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 1991. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. 3rd ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies. New York, New York.
Reynolds, S., 1999. US Filter Jet Tech, Edwardsville, Kansas. Personal communication with Dacia Mosso, Parsons Engineering Science.
Sloan Equipment, Owings Mills, Maryland, 1999. Literature provided by distributor and manufacturer (Aeration Products, Inc.).
Water Environment Federation (WEF), 1998. Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. Manual of Practice No. 8. 4th ed. vol. 2. WEF. Alexandria, Virginia.
Water Environment Federation (WEF), 1985. Operation of Extended Aeration Package Plants. Manual of Practice No. OM-7. WEF. Alexandria, Virginia.
Mr. Mike Lynn Onsite Solutions P.O. Box 570 Nokesville, Virginia 20182 Sequencing batch reactors Steve Giarrusso Operator 213 Osborne Street Minoa, NY 13116 Steven Urich Facility Manager Medley Pretreatment Facility 9431 Live Oak Place Suite 309 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33324 Oxidation ditches Robert Holland Utilities Superintendent Ocoee Wastewater Treatment Plant 1800 A. D. Mims Road Ocoee, FL 34761 Michael Eldredge Chief Operator Edgartown Wastewater Department P.O. Box 1068 Edgartown, MA 02539 The mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Extended aeration plants For more information contact: Ted Jackson (O&M) Tim Coughlin (General questions) Manager Engineering Programs Aldie WWTP P.O. Box 4000 Leesburg, VA 20177
Municipal Technology Branch U.S. EPA Mail Code 4204 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460
Page 319 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
APPENDIX
F
FINANCIAL MODEL SAMPLE OUTPUTS
Page 320 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Page 321 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
AGENDA ITEM #b)
F.1 SAMPLE MODEL OUTPUTS Sample Model outputs are provided on the following pages. These outputs are not intended to be indicative of recommended development characteristics or potential; rather, they are intended to display the types of information that can be gleaned from the Model, and the format in which the information is presented. The collection of outputs summarized on the following pages incorporates the primary Model outputs, but is not an exhaustive list of every output available. The Model provides three tabs summarizing outputs:
FULL SUMMARY, IN 2017 DOLLARS This tab provides a collection of key calculations and metrics for each year in the Model’s evaluation period. Results are presented in 2017 dollars (CAD), reflective of the inputs and calculations in the Model. A representative screenshot is provided in Figure F-1.
FULL SUMMARY, IN YEAR-OF-EXPENDITURE DOLLARS This tab provides a collection of key calculations and metrics for each year in the Model’s evaluation period. Results are presented in year-of-expenditure dollars, reflective of approximate dollar values anticipated in future years as a function of user-provided inflation rates for each year in the Model evaluation period. A representative screenshot is provided in Figure F-2.
QUICK SUMMARY This tab provides a dashboard summary of key metrics summed for the entire evaluation period. The dashboard presents results in both tabular and chart form. Representative results are presented in Table F-1 and Figure F-3.
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 322 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
WSP June 2019 Page F-1
Page 323 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Figure F-1: Full Summary (2017 Dollars) Sample Output
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
WSP June 2019 Page F-2
Page 324 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Figure F-2: Full Summary (Year-of-Expenditure Dollars) Sample Output
WSP June 2019 Page F-3
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 325 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Table F-1: Model Summary Results
General Active Funding Option Number of Phases Communal System Capital Costs Reserve Fund Balance at Lifecycle Close Potential Catastrophe Cost at Lifecycle Close Total Lifecycle Utility Fees Paid Total Lifecycle Incremental Property Tax Paid Total Lifecycle Hookup Fees Paid Lifecycle Developer O&M Obligations Potential Induced Lifecycle Tax Revenue Estimated Lifecycle Payment Leakages Total Development Area Steady-State Unit Cost for Water/Wastewater (No Connection Fee) Steady-State Utility Fee for Water/Wastewater (No Connection Fee) Estimated Steady-State Water Consumption (Full Development)
Catastrophe Prop. Tax 1 1,177,860 1,657,600 977,624 3,813,800 1,017,300 124,000 81,861 524,713 95,346 13.55 7.93 6.27 22,630
Phases 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ 2017 $ Hectares 2017 $ / m3 2017 $ / m3 m3/year
62 2,000 2,287 0.1669% 0.1676% 2.09
Units 2017 $ 2017 $ % % 2017 $
Commercial Total Area of Commercial Units Initial Hookup Fee per Commercial Unit Estimated Stabilized Annual Utility Fee per Commercial Unit Existing Tax Rate (Commercial) New Tax Rate (Commercial) Annual Property Tax Increase Per Typical Commercial Unit
2,000 0.1669% 0.1676% 2.78
m2 2017 $ 2017 $ % % 2017 $
WSP June 2019 Page F-4
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
Residential Total Number of Residential Units Initial Hookup Fee per Residential Unit Estimated Stabilized Annual Utility Fee per Residential Unit Existing Tax Rate (Residential) New Tax Rate (Residential) Annual Property Tax Increase Per Typical Residential Unit
Page 326 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
Figure F-3: Reserve Balances, Induced Annual Tax Revenue, and Utility Fees and Taxes Required to Pay for Proposed Communal System (in 2017 Dollars)
WSP June 2019 Page F-5
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
F.2 BASIC USER GUIDE As discussed in greater detail during the training session WSP held with the County on January 28, 2019, the Model is colour-coded to make user interaction simple and clear. Tabs in the model are coloured as followed: •
Red tab: User guide
•
Yellow tabs: User input is entered and stored o
Cells intended for user input are highlighted in yellow; other cells represent calculations or static inputs which should not be changed to ensure integrity and functionality of the Model is maintained.
•
Grey tab: Time and escalation calculations are performed. This tab should not be adjusted by the user.
•
Green tabs: Model calculations are performed. Generally speaking, these tabs should not be adjusted by the user. o
•
One exception exists within the ‘Stabilized Utility Fees’ tab and the ‘Stabilized Property Tax’ tab, where buttons (represented by a calculator icon) need to be clicked to update the Model outputs whenever Model inputs have been adjusted by the user.
Purple tabs: Results are summarized and presented to the user.
Steps required to use the Model are as follows:
- The user enters and/or modifies data in yellow cells in the InpC (‘Input Column’) tab.
- The user enters and/or modifies data in yellow cells in the InpR (‘Input Row’) tab.
- The user clicks the Calculator button in the InpC tab (cell I7).
- The user retrieves results from the Summary tabs.
WSP June 2019 Page F-6
Page 327 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
AGENDA ITEM #b)
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC COMMUNAL SERVICES STUDY
Page 328 ofDevelopment 437 2019-074 Planning and Economic Communal Services Study
JUNE 2019
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Report 2019-063 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development - Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision - 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac - County File #10T-2011/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of subdivision for 2292 Sands Road, Battersea, to July 17, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 17, 2013. Background At its regular meeting held July 17, 2013, Council passed the following resolution: b)
2013-136 Sustainability – 2292 Sands Road, Battersea Draft Plan of Subdivision – County File 10T-2011/002
Motion #: 308-13
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Doyle Councillor Jones
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the plan of subdivision submitted by FoTenn Consultants Inc on behalf of Roger and Roberta Ouellette, being Parts 9 & 10, Concession 9, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac, County File No. 10T-2011/002: subject to the Conditions of Draft Approval contained in the County Planning Report dated July 10, 2013 noted as Exhibit A to this report;
Page 329 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
And Finally That the Clerk be authorized to issue draft approval by signing the required documents and making any technical corrections to the conditions as needed. Carried At its regular meeting held May 18, 2016, Council extended the draft approval passed via the following resolution: e)
2016-059 Planning & Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002
Motion #: 89-16
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Nossal Warden Smith
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning & Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of subdivision for 2292 Sands Road, Battersea, to July 17, 2017, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 17, 2013. Carried At its regular meeting held June 21, 2017, Council extended the draft approval passed via the following resolution: a)
2017-081 Planning & Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002
Motion #: 101-17
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Inglis Warden Vandewal
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning & Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of subdivision for 2292 Sands Road, Battersea, to July 17, 2018, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 17, 2013. Carried
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 4
Page 330 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
At its regular meeting held June 20, 2018, Council extended the draft approval passed via the following resolution: c)
2018-080 Planning & Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac County File #10T-2011/002 Motion #: 108-18 Moved By: Councillor Smith Seconded By: Councillor McDougall Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development - Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision - 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac - County File #10T-2011/002 report for information; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of subdivision for 2292 Sands Road, Battersea, to July 17, 2019, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 17, 2013. Carried Comment The subject property is 23 hectares (56.8 acres) in size and is located in the Township of South Frontenac on Sands Road, in the southern portion of the hamlet of Battersea. The lands are currently occupied with an existing single detached dwelling. A large wooded ridge dominates the northern and western portions of the property, with the lands generally rural in character sloping toward nearby wetlands. The surrounding area contains mostly rural single detached lots, wooded areas and farmland, and a wetland is located just north of the property. The subject property is legally described as Parts 9 & 10, Concession 9, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac. A map of the subject site is attached. The plan of subdivision would see the creation of a residential subdivision consisting of 15 single detached lots, two storm water blocks, a public roadway, a road allowance that would allow a possible future connection to the existing hamlet of Battersea, and a block for the existing home. The plan was originally submitted in 2011 and was the third version of the plan that the applicant had prepared in response to comments from agencies, Township of South Frontenac and the public. Section 50.1 of the Planning Act States: Lapse of approval (32) In giving approval to a draft plan of subdivision, the approval authority may provide that the approval lapses at the expiration of the time period specified by the approval authority, being not less than three years, and the approval shall Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 4
Page 331 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
lapse at the expiration of the time period, but if there is an appeal under subsection (39) the time period specified for the lapsing of approval does not begin until the date the Municipal Board’s decision is issued in respect of the appeal or from the date of a notice issued by the Board under subsection (51). 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (6). Extension (33) The approval authority may extend the approval for a time period specified by the approval authority and may further extend it but no extension is permissible if the approval lapses before the extension is given. 1994, c. 23, s. 30. The approval for this draft plan of subdivision expires on July 17, 2019. The County of Frontenac is in receipt of an application submitted by Fotenn Consultants on behalf of the applicant for an extension of draft for an additional one (1) year. The reason stated on the application as to why draft plan extension is required reads as follows: “Since obtaining draft subdivision approval, one of the two owners, Roger Ouellette, regrettably passed away. His wife, Roberta Ouellette, is not in a position to satisfy draft conditions and is therefore attempting to sell the lands. A one year extension was granted in 2016, 2017 and again in 2018; however, Ms. Ouellette has not been successful in selling the property. An additional one year extension is being requested to allow the owner to sell the lands before draft plan approval expires.” The application notes that this Plan of Subdivision is located within a settlement area where development is most desired from a planning perspective. An additional one year extension is being requested to allow the owner to sell the lands before draft approval expires. A copy of the application submitted by Fotenn Consultants is attached. The County has the full responsibility/authority to make the decision regarding an extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Township of South Frontenac has the opportunity to provide a recommendation to County Council regarding the extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac passed the following resolution at their meeting held June 4, 2019: “THAT South Frontenac Council recommends the County of Frontenac extend draft plan approval for a period of one year for application 10T-2011/002, subject to the conditions approved by County Council on July 17, 2013 and direct the Clerk to forward this resolution to the County Clerk. Carried” Link to South Frontenac Council Report - June 4, 2019 Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Township of South Frontenac Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 4
Page 332 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Page 333 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Page 334 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Page 335 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
148
7
5
8
130
14
111
5 12
112
13
5
140
4
143
2
11
10
14
116
12
5
BLOCK 18
140
115
143
BLOCK 17
13
3
9
12
0
145
147
117
BLOCK 16
6
±
110
110
Page 336 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
2292 SANDS ROAD, BATTERSEA - SUBDIVISION
Spot Height Contours
Subdivision
113 114
Wetland
Wetland - Other Significance
15
133
123
Parcel Fabric Data Source: OGDE, MPAC & The County of Frontenac. Created: July 4th, 2013 Reference: Produced by the County of Frontenac with data supplied under license by members of the Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange. The County of Frontenac disclaims all responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in this publication.
0
50
100 Meters
200
0 11
AGENDA ITEM #c)
1
Legend
Page 337 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
CONDITIONS TO APPROVAL The conditions of approval for the draft plan of subdivision are as follows:
- Approved Draft Plan: That this conditional approval applies to the Draft Plan of Subdivision, dated April 26, 2013, prepared and certified by Hopkins, Cormier, and Chitty Surveying Consultants Inc OLS. which shows the following: 15 lots for single detached dwellings (Lots 1-15); Two stormwater blocks (Blocks 16 and 17) 1 block for an existing single detached dwelling (Block 18) One public road (Street A) One future road allowance (Street B)
- Subdivision Agreement: That the owners of the subject land enter into a subdivision agreement with the municipality, prepared to the satisfaction of the municipality, to be registered on title of the subject land.
- Financial Requirements: A. That the owner agree in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise of the municipality concerning the provision of roads, installation of services and drainage, in accordance with the municipality’s standards and procedures. B. That the Owner shall reimburse the Township of South Frontenac and County of Frontenac for all legal, engineering, planning, administrative expenses and permit fees including the cost of any peer review that the Township of South Frontenac or County of Frontenac may require in relation to the subdivision.
- Access: A. That the road allowance included in this draft plan as ‘Street A’ shall be shown and constructed to Township standards for public roads with paved asphalt surfacing and that the road be dedicated as a public highway. B. That visual screening in the form of fencing and/or earthen berms and/or trees may be required to be constructed along the east and west side of the new road allowance where it abuts the existing neighbouring property and Lot 15 at Sands Road. After final grading of the new road is completed, the Township will determine the extent of buffering required based on providing an adequate measure of privacy for Lot 15 and the existing property-owner who could be negatively affected by the traffic on the new street. C. That the street shall be named to the satisfaction of the municipality. Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 1 of 8
Page 338 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
D. That any dead ends and open sides of road allowance created by this plan of subdivision shall be terminated in 0.3 metre reserves to be conveyed to and held in trust by the municipality and that ‘Street B’ which is a 20 metre wide area of land, be dedicated to the Township extending north from the new street and ending at the northern limit of the subject land to be for the purpose of providing a future road access to the north. E. That a 1.5 metre wide concrete sidewalk be constructed to a standard satisfactory to the Township along the southeast side of the road allowance from Sands Road in the south and terminating at the cul-de-sac in the north and that the technical drawings prepared by EXP services Inc. be revised to show this sidewalk in relation to ditching and stormwater flows. The Township acknowledges that the 20 metre wide road allowance may be required to be further widened to accommodate this construction. 5. On-Site Sewage Disposal and Water Systems: A. That the recommendations outlined in the letter dated November 14, 2012 and July 5, 2013 from KFL&A Public Health to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality. B. That all requirements and recommendations specified in the Hydrogeology, Terrain Analysis and Nitrate Impact Assessment Report, revised dated April 9, 2013, from EXP Services Inc., and associated drawings be complied with. C. That any existing wells and or septic systems that may be present on the site and are not to be used as part of the plan of subdivision be decommissioned as per applicable regulations. 6. Environment A. That all conditions outlined in the letters dated October 29, 2012 and May 29, 2013 from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality. B. That the 30 metre setback from the wetland as illustrated by a grey dashed line on the ‘Site and Existing Conditions Plan C-01’, by EXP Services Inc, revision date 13/04/17, be identified on Lots 6 through 14 with a line of shrubs with a minimum height of 0.5 metres to be installed by the developer and maintained by each future Lot-owner for the purpose of defining a nobuild area on each of these lots. C. That a development agreement be entered into and registered on the title of Lots 6 through 14 which would require each Lot-owner to maintain a line of shrubs defining the 30 metre setback from the wetland and which would impose prohibitions on development within the area of each Lot that lies within the 30 metre setback from the wetland in accordance with the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Statement, dated March 5, 2011, from Ecological Services, and the Township’s environmental protection policies. Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 2 of 8
Page 339 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
D. That recommendation number two of the EIS (Ecological Services, March 5, 2011) regarding the maintenance of a 15 m no disturbance area adjacent to the swamp areas be implemented through site plan control, development agreements, or other such means as deemed appropriate by the Township. E. That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed subdivision conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the wetland within Lots 6 through 14 be zoned Environmental Protection (EP) Zone and that the zoning is satisfactory to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. F. That the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) dated March 5, 2011, be implemented including the recommendation to complete a ‘Woodland Preservation Plan’ prepared by a qualified professional to maintain the ecological integrity of the woodlands on the high-ground in the northwest portion of the property and to ensure that it is not fragmented in accordance with the specifications presented in the EIS. G. That the recommendations of the ‘Woodland Preservation Plan’ for preserving the woodlands on the high ground on the northwest portion of the subdivision be incorporated into an agreement to be entered into and registered on the title of Lots 2 through 7. The agreement shall require each Lot-owner to maintain the trees as specified in the Plan. H. That the Subdivision Agreement include text to the satisfaction of the Township and the CRCA to provide notice to purchasers of Lots 5 to 14 inclusive and Blocks 16 and 17 that site alteration and construction (including but not limited to buildings, structures, filling and grading) on these lots will require permission under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses prior to commencing these activities. I. That the Subdivision Agreement include text to the satisfaction of the Township and the CRCA notifying the Owner that permission will be required under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses prior to commencing rough grading, stockpiling, etc. associated with this subdivision. 7. Stormwater A. That a lot grading and drainage plan and a sediment and erosion control plan be completed and approved to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (‘CRCA’), and be included in the Subdivision Agreement between the Owner and the Township. B. That a stormwater management plan be prepared by a qualified Professional Engineer and approved to the satisfaction of the Township and the CRCA, and that appropriate text to implement its findings be included in the Subdivision Agreement. Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 3 of 8
Page 340 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
C. That site drainage design, construction and maintenance be in accordance with the recommendations contained in the ‘Stormwater Management Report for the Sands Road Residential Development’, revised dated April, 2013 by EXP Services Inc., and associated drawings including the construction of ditches, culverts and stormwater management facilities designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the municipality on Blocks ‘16’ and ‘17’ and that such facilities be dedicated to the Township of South Frontenac. D. That the blocks to be dedicated to the Township for the two stormwater management ponds be designed with a minimum of 10 metres of frontage on the new street to provide direct access for drainage and maintenance of the stormwater management facilities. 8. Parkland Dedication: That the owner convey up to five percent of the land included in the plan to the municipality for park purposes. Alternatively, the municipality may require cashin-lieu for all or a portion of the conveyance. 9. Human Remains: The subdivision agreement shall contain a clause providing that any Owner(s) be advised, and also that a notice be placed in the purchase and sale agreement alerting any prospective purchasers that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction or site development of a lot, that the property owner shall immediately contact the OPP, the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Unit of the Ministry of Consumer Services. 10. Archaeological Resources: A. That the subdivision agreement include all recommendations contained in the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report dated June 2011, from Golder Associates Ltd. B. That the archaeological resource identified in the Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Report, dated October 11, 2011 by Abacus Archaeological Services on Lot 4 in the subdivision and further noted in the letter dated October 10, 2012 from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, be protected by way of special zoning on Lot 4 and that any required future measures to protect the feature be implemented to the satisfaction of the Township. 11. On-Site Works A. That all entrances to the lots including entrance culverts be located and constructed to the satisfaction of the Township. B. That all servicing including Bell, Hydro etc. be installed underground.
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 4 of 8
Page 341 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
C. That, prior to final approval, the municipality shall be satisfied that all servicing issues are resolved such as road and sidewalk construction, Canada Post, Bell Canada, and stormwater pond construction. D. That, the subdivision agreement include a requirement that one tree be planted in the front yard of each of the fifteen lots in the subdivision of a size, type and location specified in the Township’s Site Plan Guidelines. E. That, prior to final approval, street lighting shall be installed according to Township standards and to the satisfaction of the municipality. F. That, prior to final approval, street signage shall be installed according to Township standards and to the satisfaction of the municipality. 12. Revisions to Draft Plan: A. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the Owner shall submit a revised Block Plan, if required, to reflect any significant alterations caused from this Draft Plan Approval. 13. That where final engineering design(s) result in minor variations to the Plan (e.g., in the configuration of lots, etc.), these may be reflected in the Final Plan subject to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the County of Frontenac. Community Mailboxes: A. That Prior to Final Plan Approval, the Owner shall, in consultation with and to the satisfaction of Canada Post, identify the method of mail delivery. If community mailboxes are required, the location of the community mailboxes within the Plan shall be identified on drawings for approval by the Township. The locations of these community mailboxes shall be identified in the notice to future purchasers of the lots within the Subdivision. B. The Owner shall, if required, provide detailed design plans for the community mailboxes including a landscape plan. C. If required, the Owner shall provide a suitable temporary community mailbox location to the satisfaction of the Township. 14. Bell Canada A. The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Developer must confirm that sufficient wire line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development. In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the Developer is hereby advised that the Developer may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Developer elects not to pay for such connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure, the Developer shall be Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 5 of 8
Page 342 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
required to demonstrate to the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e., 911 Emergency Services). B. The Owner shall agree in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. Easements may be required subject to final servicing decisions. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the owner/developer shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. C. The Owner shall be required to enter into an agreement (Letter of Understanding) with Bell Canada complying with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the Municipality, and if no such conditions are imposed the owner shall advise the municipality of the arrangement made for such servicing. 15. General conditions: A. That when requesting final Approval from the County of Frontenac, the Owner shall accompany such request with the required number of originals and copies of the Final Plan, together with a surveyor’s certificate stating that the lots/blocks thereon conform to the frontage and area requirements of the Zoning By-Law. B. That the lands within this Draft Plan shall be appropriately zoned by a Zoning By-Law which has come into effect in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. 16. Clearance Letters: A. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County of Frontenac shall be advised that all Conditions of Draft Plan Approval have been satisfied; the clearance memorandum shall include a brief statement detailing how each Condition has been met. B. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Township of South Frontenac the method by which conditions 1 to 15 have been satisfied. C. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by KFL&A Public Health the method by which conditions 5 A and B have been satisfied. D. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority the method by which conditions 6) and 7) A to C have been satisfied. E. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by Canada Post the method by which condition 13 has been satisfied. Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 6 of 8
Page 343 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
F. That Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by Bell Canada the method by which condition 14 has been satisfied. 17. Lapsing Provisions: A. That pursuant to Section 51(32) of the Planning Act, this Draft Plan Approval shall lapse at the expiration of three (3) years from the date of issuance of Draft Plan Approval if final approval has not been given, unless an extension is requested by the Owner and, subject to review, granted by the approval authority. B. That pursuant to Section 51(33) of the Planning Act, the Owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension of the Draft Plan Approval. The extension period shall be for a maximum of three (3) years and must be submitted prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Approval. Further extensions may be considered at the discretion of the Township and the County.
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 7 of 8
Page 344 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #c)
Applicant: Roger and Roberta Ouellette File No.: 10T-2008/002 Municipality: Township of South Frontenac in the County of Frontenac Subject Lands: 2292 Sands Road
Date of Decision: July 17, 2013 Date of Notice: Last Date of Appeal:
Notes To Draft Approval
- It is the applicant’s responsibility to fulfill the foregoing Conditions of Draft Plan Approval and to ensure that the required clearance letters are forwarded by the appropriate agencies to the County of Frontenac.
- When requesting Final Approval, the applicant will submit an account of how each Condition of Draft Approval has been satisfied along with the appropriate clearance letter from the Agency, Ministry or body requesting the condition.
- Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the applicant shall submit to the County of Frontenac for review four (4) draft copies of all Reference Plans and Surveys and three (3) draft copies of the Final M-Plan.
- When requesting final approval, such a request must be directed to the Deputy Clerk, and be accompanied with:
Eight (8) mylars and four (4) paper prints of the completed Final M-Plan; Four (4) copies of all Reference Plans and (4) copies of all Conveyance Documents for all easements and lands being conveyed to the Municipality; and, A Surveyor’s Certificate to the effect that the lots and blocks on the Plan conform to the Zoning By-Law with respect to lot area and lot frontage. A digital file in AutoCad format.
- All measurements in subdivision final plans must be presented in metric units.
- The Final Plan approved by the County of Frontenac must be registered within thirty (30) days or the County of Frontenac may, under Subsection 51(59) of the Planning Act, withdraw it approval.
- Clearances are required from the following agencies:
Township of South Frontenac KFL&A Public Health Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Canada Post Bell Canada
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision – 2292 Sands Road Township of South Frontenac – County File #10T-2011/002 May 18, 2016 Page 8 of 8
Page 345 ofDevelopment 437 2019-063 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Report 2019-064 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Cranberry Cove, to July 16, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 16, 2014. Background At its regular meeting held July 16, 2014, Council passed the following resolution: d)
2014-117 Corporate Services Cranberry Cove Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium – County File 10CD-2012/002
Motion #: 160-14
Moved By: Councillor Purdon Seconded By: Councillor Inglis
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the draft plan of vacant land condominium submitted by Gary Thomson on behalf of 1412713 Ontario Limited, being Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot 26, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac, County File No. 10CD-2012/002: subject to the Conditions of Draft Approval contained in the County Planning Report
Page 346 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
dated July 11, 2014 noted as Appendix B to this report, as amended to include the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority conditions dated July 14, 2014 (a copy of which was distributed at the meeting); And Finally That the Clerk be authorized to issue draft approval by signing the required documents and making any technical corrections to the conditions as needed. Carried At its regular meeting held June 21, 2017, Council extended the draft approval passed via the following resolution: b)
2017-082 Planning & Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002
Motion #: 102-17
Moved By: Councillor Doyle Seconded By: Councillor Smith
Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning & Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Cranberry Cove, to July 16, 2018, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 16, 2014. Carried At its regular meeting held June 20, 2018, Council extended the draft approval passed via the following resolution: e)
2018-082 Planning & Economic Development Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium Cranberry Cove County File 10CD-2012/002 Motion #: 111-18 Moved By: Councillor Nossal Seconded By: Councillor Inglis Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 report for information; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Cranberry Cove, to July 16, 2019, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix B, approved by County Council July 16, 2014. Carried Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 4
Page 347 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Comment The subject property is 25.5 hectares (63 acres) and is located at Carrying Place Road and Cranberry Cove Lane, with water frontage on Cranberry Lake, northeast of the hamlet of Battersea in the Township of South Frontenac. The application is for the creation of a residential vacant land condominium consisting of 13 single detached units, one storage garage unit, one parking area unit, three common element private condominium roads, one private open space block, one lake access easement block and two 30 centimetre reserve blocks. It is legally described as Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac. A map of the subject site is attached as Appendix A. Section 50.1 of the Planning Act States: Lapse of approval (32) In giving approval to a draft plan of subdivision, the approval authority may provide that the approval lapses at the expiration of the time period specified by the approval authority, being not less than three years, and the approval shall lapse at the expiration of the time period, but if there is an appeal under subsection (39) the time period specified for the lapsing of approval does not begin until the date the Municipal Board’s decision is issued in respect of the appeal or from the date of a notice issued by the Board under subsection (51). 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (6). Extension (33) The approval authority may extend the approval for a time period specified by the approval authority and may further extend it but no extension is permissible if the approval lapses before the extension is given. 1994, c. 23, s. 30. The approval for this draft plan of subdivision expires on July 17, 2019. The County of Frontenac is in receipt of an application submitted by ZanderPlan Inc. on behalf of the applicant for an extension of draft for an additional one (1) year. The application to extend draft plan approval for Cranberry Cove lists the, “ongoing legal dispute between the previous project manager and Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation, the owner was delayed in their ability to clear the Draft plan conditions and register the Condominium. The legal dispute has been resolved and Zander Plan (Tracy Zander) has been retained as project manager to complete the registration”. The application lists additional reasons why Council should consider extending draft plan approval. It states “The registration of this project will bring numerous economic benefits to the Township. Final details required to complete the registration of the Condominium are legal and administrative in nature and we are confident that these can be completed in a timely manner now that the legal dispute has been resolved.”
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 4
Page 348 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
The County has the full responsibility/authority to make the decision regarding an extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Township of South Frontenac has the opportunity to provide a recommendation to County Council regarding the extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac passed the following resolution at their meeting held June 4, 2019: “THAT South Frontenac Council recommends the County of Frontenac extend draft plan approval for a period of one year for application 10CD-2012/002, subject to the conditions approved by County Council on July 16, 2014 and direct the Clerk to forward this resolution to the County Clerk. Carried” In the Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Cranberry Cove Plan of Condominium 10CD-2012/002 report before Township Council at the June 4, 2019 Township of South Frontenac Council meeting, staff noted that the condominium agreement needed to be finalized before the Township could finalize the agreement and send the corresponding clearance letter to the County for final approval. The Township report notes that the majority of draft approval conditions have been fulfilled and the remaining outstanding conditions are administrative and relatively minor in nature. As such, the Township recommended an extension of one year to allow the Project Manager to work with Township staff to make the required amendments to the condominium agreement and bring this back to Township Council in a reasonable timeframe. Link to South Frontenac Council Report - June 4, 2019 County planning staff along with the Owner, Project Manager, Township staff and commenting agencies completed a site visit of the subject property on Wednesday May 29th, 2019. At this site visit the commenting agencies and Township confirmed that the outstanding work was minor in nature and were supportive of the one year extension. County Councillors also had the opportunity to attend the site. Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Township of South Frontenac
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 4
Page 349 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Page 350 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Page 351 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Page 352 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Page 353 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
CRANBERRY COVE CONDOMINIUM
±
Inset Map:
South Frontenac
UNIT 10
City of Kingston
BLO
CK 1
7
UNIT 12
UNIT 11
UNIT 9 UNIT 13
g in rry Ca
e ac Pl
Rd
OTHER LANDS
BL OC
UNIT 8 UNIT 6
K
16
BLOCK 19
UNIT 7 UNIT 14
OC BL
K
17
UNIT 5 UNIT 15
ys Terr Ln
UNIT 4
UNIT 3
UNIT 2
Cranberry Lake
Cra n
be rr
y
Co
ve
Ln
UNIT 1
0
50
100
200
Metres Data Source: OGDE, MPAC & The County of Frontenac. Created: July 10th, 2014 Reference: Produced by the County of Frontenac with data supplied under license by members of the Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange. The County of Frontenac disclaims all responsibility for errors, omissions or inaccuracies in this publication.
Page 354 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
CONDITIONS TO APPROVAL The conditions of approval for the draft plan of condominium are as follows:
- Approved Draft Plan: That this conditional approval applies to the Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium, dated 01/04/12, revised May 30, 2014 prepared and certified by Clancy and Hopkins Surveying Limited, OLS, which shows the following: • 13 units for single detached dwellings (Units 1-13); • 1 storage garage (Unit 14) • 1 parking area (Unit 15) • Three road blocks (Blocks 16-18) • One common element open space block (Block 19) • One easement block (Block 20) • Two 0.3 m reserves (Blocks 21 & 22)
- Condominium Agreement: That the owners of the subject land enter into a plan of vacant land condominium agreement with the municipality, prepared to the satisfaction of the municipality, to be registered on title of the subject land.
- Financial Requirements: A. That the owner agree in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise of the municipality concerning the provision/upgrading of roads, installation of services and drainage, in accordance with the municipality’s standards and procedures. B. That the Owner shall reimburse the Township of South Frontenac and County of Frontenac for all legal, engineering, planning, administrative expenses and permit fees including the cost of any peer review that the Township of South Frontenac or County of Frontenac may require in relation to the condominium.
- Access A. That the road allowances included in this draft plan identified as Block 16 Common Element’, ‘Block 17 Common Element’ and ‘Block 18 Common Element’ shall be shown and constructed to Township standards for new private lanes. B. That a portion of Carrying Place Road from the existing fire hall on the road to the entranceway to the development (approximately 712 metres) be surface treated to the satisfaction of the Township. Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 355 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 1 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
C. That the new lanes identified as ‘Block 17 Common Element’ and Block 18 Common Element’ shall be named to the satisfaction of the municipality. D. That 0.3 metre reserves be identified by survey along the road allowance of Carrying Place Road where it abuts proposed units 6, 9, and 10 to be conveyed to and held in trust by the municipality for the purpose of denying additional access onto Carrying Place Road. E. That, prior to final approval, street signage shall be installed according to Township standards and to the satisfaction of the municipality.
- Declaration, Easements and Joint Use Agreement A. That the easements referred to in the August 13, 2013 letter from Soloway Wright to the County of Frontenac be created within the declaration of a condominium, with the proposed additional access from the island located at Part 2, Plan 13R-8978 being subject to confirmation that the proposed easement is to the Township’s satisfaction B. That Cranberry Cove Lane be subject to a joint use agreement (or other similar legal agreement), to be registered on title, between the condominium corporation/declarant and the properties listed in the August 13, 2013 letter from Soloway Wright to the County of Frontenac to the satisfaction of the Township.
- On-Site Sewage Disposal and Water Systems: A. That the recommendations outlined in the letter dated January 10, 2014 from KFL&A Public Health to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality and KFL&A Public Health B. That all requirements and recommendations specified in the Hydrogeology, Terrain Analysis and Nitrate Impact Assessment Report, revised dated April 9, 2013, from Lissom Soil and Water Inc., and ‘Cranberry Cove Nitrate Attenuation Calculations’ from Greer Galloway Group Inc., dated November 12, 2013, and project letter dated March 15, 2014 and all associated drawings and peer review recommendations be complied with. C. That any existing wells and or septic systems that may be present on the site and are not to be used as part of the plan of condominium be decommissioned as per applicable regulations.
- Environment A. That the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) dated January 12, 2012 prepared by Ecological Services, be implemented Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 356 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 2 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
including the requirement that all development be set back a minimum of 35 metres from the high water mark of Cranberry Lake and inland ponds. B. That all conditions and issues outlined in the letters dated November 26, 2012 and December 12, 2013 from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority/Rideau Waterway Development Review Team to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality and Rideau Waterway Development Review Team. C. That a practical building envelope in compliance with the Zoning By-law and EIS be identified to the Township’s satisfaction on Unit 2 D. That the area on ‘Block 19 Common Element’ near Unit 14 at the narrowest point between the lane and the water’s edge be vegetated with natural species of shrubs and trees as identified in the Township’s Site Plan Guidelines and to the satisfaction of the Township. E. That notice be provided to future purchasers advising them of the applicable CRCA and Parks Canada regulations, and any particular environmental restrictions on individual lots, in wording and in a manner to the satisfaction of the Rideau Waterway Development Team and the Township F. That an agreement be registered on the subject land applying to all of the proposed units to deal with setting out the municipality’s limited service policies to recognize that there is no commitment or requirement by the municipality to assume responsibility for ownership or maintenance of the private lanes within the plan. In addition, the agreement applying to Units 1-5 shall set out the municipality’s standard environmental protection policies requiring that the area within 35 metres of the highwater mark of the lake be maintained in a natural state for soil and vegetation. 8. Stormwater A. That a lot grading and drainage plan and a sediment and erosion control plan be completed and approved to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (‘CRCA’), and be included in the Condominium Agreement between the Owner and the Township. B. That a stormwater management plan be prepared by a qualified Professional Engineer and approved to the satisfaction of the Township and the CRCA, and that appropriate text to implement its findings be included in the Condominium Agreement. C. That, prior to final approval, the Township shall be satisfied that all servicing issues are resolved such as lane construction; stormwater drainage, design, and maintenance; and the construction and design of ditches and culverts. Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 357 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 3 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
- Parkland Dedication: That the owner convey up to five percent of the value of the land in the form of cash-in-lieu of parkland.
- Human Remains: The condominium agreement shall contain a clause providing that any Owner(s) be advised, and also that a notice be placed in the purchase and sale agreement alerting any prospective purchasers that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction or site development of a lot, that the property owner shall immediately contact the OPP, the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Unit of the Ministry of Consumer Services (or the applicable agencies at the time of final approval).
- Archaeological Resources: A. That all recommendations of the Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1-2 & Stage 3) Report, dated June 4, 2010 by Adams Heritage and further revised May 2013 be implemented to the satisfaction of the Township. B. That if during the process of development any archaeological resources or human remains of Aboriginal interest are encountered, the Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office will be contacted immediately at: Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office 31 Riverside Drive, Suite 101 Pembroke, Ontario K8A 8R6 Telephone: (613) 735-3759 Fax: (613) 735-6307 email: algonquins@nrtco.net
- Utilities and On-Site Works A. That a garbage pick-up area be included on the plan at a location near Carrying Place Road and to the satisfaction of the Township. B. That an easement be included and a dry fire hydrant shall be constructed at a location to be determined to provide for a Dry Hydrant - this hydrant and the access to it shall be left unobstructed and accessed by the Township for inspection anytime year round and shall be maintained 100 percent, twelve months per year by the Corporation which requirement shall be incorporated into the final condominium agreement. Construction of the hydrant and all maintenance costs shall be borne by the developer/condominium corporation and shall be to the satisfaction of the Township Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 358 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 4 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
C. That, subject to the requirements of Canada Post, any mail boxes shall be placed at a location near the entrance to the development near Carrying Place Road and to the satisfaction of the Township. D. That prior to final approval, the Owner satisfy the Township that public utilities, including without limitation Bell Canada, Hydro One, etc., are adequate to service the proposed development. E. That, prior to final approval, street lighting shall be installed at the entrance to the development at Carrying Place Road such lighting to also illuminate any garbage pick-up area and mail box location. 13. Revisions to Draft Plan: A. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the Owner shall submit a revised Block Plan, if required, to reflect any significant alterations caused from this Draft Plan Approval. B. That where final engineering design(s) result in minor variations to the Plan (e.g., in the configuration of lots, etc.), these may be reflected in the Final Plan subject to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the County of Frontenac. 14. General conditions: A. That when requesting final Approval from the County of Frontenac, the Owner shall accompany such request with the required number of originals and copies of the Final Plan, together with a surveyor’s certificate stating that the lots/blocks thereon conform to the frontage and area requirements of the Zoning By-Law. B. That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed subdivision conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the zoning is satisfactory to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. C. That the Owner submit a draft Vacant Land Condominium Declaration for approval by the Township and County to ensure all conditions of approval will be satisfied
- Clearance Letters: A. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County of Frontenac shall be advised that all Conditions of Draft Plan Approval have been satisfied; the clearance memorandum shall include a brief statement detailing how each Condition has been met. Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 359 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 5 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
B. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Township of South Frontenac the method by which conditions 1 to 14 have been satisfied. C. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by KFL&A Public Health the method by which condition 6A has been satisfied. D. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority/Rideau Waterway Development Review Team the method by which conditions 7 and 8 have been satisfied. 16. Lapsing Provisions: A. That pursuant to Section 51(32) of the Planning Act, this Draft Plan Approval shall lapse at the expiration of three (3) years from the date of issuance of Draft Plan Approval if final approval has not been given, unless an extension is requested by the Owner and, subject to review, granted by the approval authority. B. That pursuant to Section 51(33) of the Planning Act, the Owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension of the Draft Plan Approval. The extension period shall be for a maximum of three (3) years and must be submitted prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Approval. Further extensions may be considered at the discretion of the Township and the County.
Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 360 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 6 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #d)
Applicant: Gary Thomson Date of Decision: July 16, 2014 File No.: 10CD-2012/002 Date of Notice: Subject Lands: Cranberry Cove Condominium Parts 1, 6 & 7 Plan 13R-8978, Except Parts 1-5, Plan 13R-18799, and Part 1, Plan 13R-19396, Part of Lot, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Pittsburgh, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac
NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL
- It is the applicant’s responsibility to fulfill the foregoing Conditions of Draft Plan Approval and to ensure that the required clearance letters are forwarded by the appropriate agencies to the County of Frontenac.
- When requesting Final Approval, the applicant will submit an account of how each Condition of Draft Approval has been satisfied along with the appropriate clearance letter from the Agency, Ministry or body requesting the condition.
- Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the applicant shall submit to the County of Frontenac for review draft digital copies of all applicable Reference Plans, Surveys and, the M-Plan.
- When requesting final approval, such a request must be directed to the Clerk, and be accompanied with: • Five (5) mylars and five (5) paper prints of the completed Final M-Plan; • Four (4) copies of all Reference Plans and (4) copies of all Conveyance Documents for all easements and lands being conveyed to the Municipality; • A copy of the condominium agreement and the condominium declaration • A Surveyor’s Certificate to the effect that the lots and blocks on the Plan conform to the Zoning By-Law with respect to lot area and lot frontage; • A digital file in AutoCad format; and, • An application fee in accordance with the County’s applicable fee by-law.
- All measurements in condominium final plans must be presented in metric units.
- The Final Plan approved by the County of Frontenac must be registered within thirty (30) days or the County of Frontenac may, under Subsection 51(59) of the Planning Act, withdraw it approval.
- Clearances are required from the following agencies: • • •
Township of South Frontenac KFL&A Public Health Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority/Rideau Waterway Development Team
Appendix B to Report 2014-117 Conditions to Approval – County File #10CD-2012/002 July 16, 2014
Page 361 ofDevelopment 437 2019-064 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 7 of 7
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Report 2019-065 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Johnston Point – County File 10CD-2014/001
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the report titled Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Johnston Point – County File 10CD-2014/001; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac extend the draft approval for the plan of condominium for Johnston Point, to June 28, 2020, based on the attached conditions detailed in Appendix A, approved by the Ontario Municipal Board June 28, 2016 and amended August 25, 2018. Background The application of Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation for draft approval of the plan of vacant land condominium together with an implementing zoning bylaw was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) for hearing. A public hearing before the OMB was held in April 2016. The OMB issued its formal Order dated June 28, 2016 which approved South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw, #2016-23 appended to that Order as Attachment 1 and approving the Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium appended to that Order as Attachment 2 subject to the fulfillment of conditions set out in Attachment 3 to the Order. Attachment 3 of the Order was replaced with a revised Attachment to an Order of the OMB issued August 25, 2016.
Page 362 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Section 17. Lapsing Provisions: B. states, “That pursuant to Section 51(33) of the Planning Act, the Owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension of the Draft Plan Approval. The extension period shall be for a maximum of three (3) years and must be submitted prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Approval. Further extensions may be considered at the discretion of the Township and County”. The project manager, Tracy Zander, submitted an application for an extension of draft plan approval pursuant to condition 17. B. of the revised attachment issued under the Order of the OMB on August 25, 2016. Comment The subject property is approximately 91 acres in area (37 hectares) and is located on a peninsula along the north shore of the east basin on Loughborough Lake. The development is accessed by Hinterland Lane from North Shore Road in the Township of South Frontenac. The application is for the creation of a residential vacant land condominium consisting of 15 residential units with 4 blocks, including access to communal docking. The subject property is legally described as Loughborough Concession 6, Part Lots 23 and 24 Part Road Allowance and RP RP;13R13844 PART 2 PT PART 1 RP;13R20626 PARTS 6 TO 8 RP;13R21292 PARTS 1 AND 2, Geographic Township of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac. A map of the subject property is attached. Section 50.1 of the Planning Act States: Lapse of approval (32) In giving approval to a draft plan of subdivision, the approval authority may provide that the approval lapses at the expiration of the time period specified by the approval authority, being not less than three years, and the approval shall lapse at the expiration of the time period, but if there is an appeal under subsection (39) the time period specified for the lapsing of approval does not begin until the date the Municipal Board’s decision is issued in respect of the appeal or from the date of a notice issued by the Board under subsection (51). 1994, c. 23, s. 30; 2006, c. 23, s. 22 (6). Extension (33) The approval authority may extend the approval for a time period specified by the approval authority and may further extend it but no extension is permissible if the approval lapses before the extension is given. 1994, c. 23, s. 30. The approval for this draft plan of vacant land condominium expires on June 28, 2019 which is three years following the issuance of the OMB Order. The County of Frontenac is in receipt of an application submitted by ZanderPlan Inc. on behalf of the applicant for an extension of draft plan for an additional one (1) year (attached). This is consistent with condition 17 B. which states that the Owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension of Draft Plan Approval for a maximum of three years prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Approval. The Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac is the approval authority referenced in Condition 17. B. to which the application has been submitted. Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 5
Page 363 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
The application to extend draft plan approval for Johnston Point lists the reasons for why an extension is requested: “The owner was required to execute an Overall Benefit Permit with MNRF to ensure protection of some species at risk habitat on the site. This is an important element of the project to define protective measures for habitat. This Permit was required prior to registration of the subdivision and has only recently been issued. In addition, as a result of an ongoing legal dispute between the previous project manager and Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation, the owner was delayed in their ability to clear the other draft Plan conditions and register the Condominium. That legal dispute has been resolved and ZanderPlan has been retained as project manager to complete the registration”. The application provides the applicant the opportunity to list additional reasons why County Council should consider extending draft plan approval. It states “The implementation of the recommendations in the supporting studies and the Overall Benefit Permit will serve to protect the natural heritage and Species at Risk Habitat.” The County has the full responsibility/authority to make the decision regarding an extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Township of South Frontenac has the opportunity to provide a recommendation to County Council regarding the extension of draft plan approval. The Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac defeated the following resolution at their meeting held June 4, 2019: “THAT South Frontenac Council recommends the County of Frontenac extend draft plan approval for a period of one year for application 10CD-2014/001, subject to the conditions outlined by the OMB decision dated June 28, 2016 and direct the Clerk to forward this resolution to the County Clerk. Defeated”. Link to South Frontenac Council Report - June 4, 2019 In the Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium 10CD-2014/001 report before Township Council at the June 4, 2019 Township of South Frontenac Council meeting, staff noted that the development has outstanding conditions that are unable to be fulfilled by the June 28, 2019 lapsing date for draft plan approval. Township staff recommended that South Frontenac Council recommend the County of Frontenac extend draft plan approval by one year, subject to the same conditions imposed by the Ontario Municipal Board to allow Township staff to ensure all Township conditions have been cleared. Township staff outlined that a significant item that prevents Township staff from being in a position to clear conditions is the ability for Township staff to review the Benefit Permit issued on November 14, 2018. The permit was issued to the proponent of the project by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and the Ministry has advised that there are unable to share the permit with the Township or County. The County filed a Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act request to obtain a copy of the Benefit Permit; as of the date of this report the Benefit Permit has not been provided.
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 5
Page 364 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Condition 5D of the Draft Plan Approval states that: The owner shall confirm that MNRF has been consulted on all species at risk issues and that the Declaration and the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement shall incorporate all recommendations from the MNRF included in any Benefit Permit, if issued, related to Gray Rat Snakes and Blandings Turtles or any other species at risk identified. Township staff are unable to finalize the condominium agreement until the Township has seen a copy of the Benefit Permit. The Project Manager, Tracy Zander, is in the process of obtaining the permit. In addition to the reasons provided in the application and the background information provided in the South Frontenac Application for Extension of Draft Plan Approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium 10CD-2014/001, the conditions of draft approval require that the location of proposed dwellings and septic system locations on Unit 7 and 15 shall be evaluated by a qualified environmental consultant and an addendum to the EIS prepared be completed. Traffic counts are also required along North Shore Road prior to the construction of the entrance to Hinterland Lane and site plan control required for all units prior to development. A one year extension will ensure that conditions are fulfilled in a transparent manner involving the appropriate agencies. In addition to this work being completed, the submitted studies are required to be reviewed by the appropriate agencies. An extension for draft plan approval under the Planning Act permits the owner to seek an extension to fulfill the required conditions of draft approval. Without including a lapsing provision within the conditions of draft approval, developments that were approved previously with studies completed at the time of submission may become dated. Further, the style of development proposed may no longer be consistent with the planning regime such as a new Provincial Policy Statement with a significant alteration to the development patterns supported. Section 50.1(33) of the Planning Act recognizes that extension to draft plan approval may be required as the section states that the approval authority may extend the approval for a time period specified by the approval authority. The Ontario Municipal Board when making their decision was satisfied that the proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), conformed to the Township Official Plan and put forth appropriate zoning. County planning staff along with the Owner, Project Manager, Township staff and commenting agencies completed a site visit of the subject property on Wednesday, May 29, 2019. At this site visit the commenting agencies and Township confirmed that the outstanding work required the extension to ensure that the required conditions are appropriately fulfilled and were supportive of the one year extension. County Councillors also had the opportunity to attend the site. Public Comments Under the Planning Act, there are no requirements for public notification for an extension of draft plan approval. The Township of South Frontenac in advance of their June 4, 2019 Council meeting received comments that were forwarded to the County (attached).
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 5
Page 365 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Township of South Frontenac
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – Extension of Approval of Draft Plan of Condominium – Cranberry Cove – County File 10CD-2012/002 June 19, 2019 Page 5 of 5
Page 366 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Page 367 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Page 368 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Page 369 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Page 370 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
PL150246 - ATTACHMENT 3
CONDITIONS TO APPROVAL
The conditions of approval for the draft plan of condominium are as follows:
- Approved Draft Plan: That this conditional approval applies to the Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium, dated February 26, 2016, last revised March 31, 2016, prepared by FOTENN Consultants Inc. and certified by Ronald Clancy, Ontario Land Surveyor comprising a total of 15 Residential Units and 4 blocks subject to the following: I.
II.
The locations of proposed dwellings and septic locations on Unit 7 and 15 shall be evaluated by a qualified environmental consultant and an addendum to the EIS prepared to confirm the locations and any conditions necessary for construction. The boundaries of the common element open space shall ensure that a 5m buffer between any units and the wetland boundary within the common element open space is established, consistent with the drawing attached as Attachment “A”.
- Condominium Agreement: A. That the owners of the subject land enter into a vacant land condominium agreement with the municipality, prepared to the satisfaction of the municipality, to be registered on title of the subject land. B. That the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement include a clause stating that 911 civic addressing and locations of all entrances to the units, including the construction and locations of any entrance culverts, shall be shown on a plan prepared to the Townships satisfaction prior to any development of the property.
- Financial Requirements: A. That the owner agree in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise of the municipality concerning the provision of private lanes and upgrading of roads, installation of services and drainage, in accordance with the municipality’s standards and procedures. B. That the Owner shall reimburse the Township of South Frontenac and County of Frontenac for all legal, engineering, planning, administrative expenses and permit fees including the cost of any peer review that the Township of South Frontenac or County of Frontenac may require in relation to the condominium.
- Access A. That the private roads included in this draft plan identified as ‘Blocks 16 and 17 shall be constructed to Township standards for new private lanes. Final approval of the constructed road will be required by the Township Public Works Manager. B. That the private roads included in this draft plan identified as ‘Blocks 16 and 17 shall be located a minimum of 30 metres from the nearest point of any wetland or waterbody. C. All driveway construction for each Unit shall require Site Plan approval. All driveways shall require engineering design by a qualified Engineer to ensure mitigative measures are applied to direct stormwater runoff and reduce erosion. Following construction, inspection and approval of the Township Public Works Manager shall be required.
Page 371 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
AGENDA ITEM #e)
D. That traffic counts be undertaken at North Shore Road and that the entrance location at the road be constructed to a standard acceptable to the Township, particularly in regards to safe sight lines and any requirements of the municipality related to traffic counts. E. That the private roads identified as ‘Blocks 16 and 17 to be created as ‘Common Element’, including the “Existing Roadway Easement Over Private Lands”, be named to the satisfaction of the municipality. F. That a 0.3 metre reserve be identified by survey along the road allowance of North Shore Road where it abuts proposed Unit 12, which 0.3 metre reserve shall be conveyed to and held in trust by the municipality for the purpose of denying additional access onto North Shore Road. G. That legal access to proposed Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 14 be obtained over the abutting portion of the existing lane that is on other private lands, and that the vacant land condominium agreement contain wording to permit this access. This wording must also acknowledge that the existing residential lots’ access over the lane will be maintained all the way back to the public road. 5. Environment and Natural Heritage A. That the vacant land condominium agreement contains wording applying to all of the proposed units setting out the municipality’s limited service policies to recognize that there is no commitment or requirement by the municipality to assume responsibility for ownership or maintenance of the private lane within the plan. In addition, the vacant land condominium agreement applying to all the waterfront units shall set out the municipality’s environmental protection policies requiring that the area within 30 metres of the highwater mark of a waterbody or wetland shall be maintained in a natural state for soil and vegetation. This 30 metre environmental protection area is identified as Attachment “B”. B. That the wetland area within the boundary of proposed Unit 14 be surveyed by the Owner prior to construction of any driveway within the Unit. The driveway shall be surveyed prior to construction to ensure that the driveway is constructed a minimum of 30m from the boundary of the surveyed wetland. The driveway shall be constructed by the Owner as a condition of sale of the Unit. This condition shall be included in the condominium agreement with the Township and the agreement of purchase and sale for Unit 14. C. That all conditions outlined in the letter dated November 12, 2014 from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to the County of Frontenac, be included in the vacant land condominium Agreement with the Township, including that all driveways be placed a minimum of 30 metres from any waterbody and that all recommendations of the stormwater management plan be implemented. D. The owner shall confirm that MNRF have been consulted on all species at risk issues and that the Declaration and the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement shall incorporate all recommendations from the MNRF included in any Benefit Permit, if issued, related to Gray Rat Snakes and Blandings Turtles or any other species at risk identified. E. That the Owner shall complete Whip Poor Will surveys to determine if they are present at the site and submit this information to the MNRF. 6. Declaration, Easements and Joint Use Agreement That the Declaration contain, at a minimum, clauses addressing the following to the satisfaction of the municipality, which clauses shall also form part of the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement: i. all access roads and driveways shall be set back a minimum of 30 m from all wetlands and water bodies; ii. silt barriers between all construction areas and wetlands or other water bodies shall be installed and maintained throughout the construction process until all disturbed areas have been revegetated; Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 372 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 2 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
iii. all building envelopes and septic beds shall be located at the top of slope, complying with the setback distances established in Attachment “C” to these Draft Plan Conditions; iv. subject only to condition 6 (v), (vii), all living trees greater than 4 inches diameter at breast height within 40 m of any water body shall not be removed, with the exception of trees knocked over naturally; v. subject only to condition 6 and (vii), all vegetation, with the exception of invasive species, shall be retained and maintained in their natural state within 30 m of all water bodies; vi. An Ecological Committee shall be set up as part of the Condominium Board whose mandate would be to promote environmental stewardship initiatives on Johnston Point. vii. Notwithstanding sub-paragraphs 6(iv) and (v) above, the owner of a Unit, with the exception of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15, may construct a walkway to the water provided that the walkway is no wider than 1.5m and provided that the walkway is constructed in the locations set out in the drawing attached to these Conditions of Draft Approval as Attachment ‘A’. Any deviation from these prescribed locations may only be considered if in consultation with a qualified environmental professional to the satisfaction of the Township; viii. The Owner shall construct the walkways to the water as a condition of sale of the Units where a walkway is permitted. This condition shall be included in the condominium agreement with the Township and the agreement of purchase and sale for all Units where a walkway is permitted; ix. The existing Butternut tree at Unit 8 shall be retained and no development shall be permitted within 25 m of the tree; x. Signage shall be installed at the PSW boundary to ensure residents do not alter, fill or negatively impact the PSW, which signage shall be worded to the satisfaction of the municipality and the CRCA; xi. Docks may only be constructed on units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (Unit 6 is subject to obtaining access in accordance with these conditions), 8, 10, 11 and 14 provided that the following restrictions are complied with:
- docks may only be constructed at the general locations identified on Attachment “A” to these Conditions of Draft Plan Approval;
- The joint use docks may only be constructed in accordance with all applicable approvals issued by the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and/or the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry;
- docks must be floating or pole docks;
- no aquatic vegetation shall be removed during construction, use or maintenance of any dock;
- the surface area of any dock located in Long Bay shall not exceed 15 m² and its length shall not exceed 8 m;
- subject to 6(xii), the surface area of any dock not located in Long Bay may not exceed 20 m² and its length shall not exceed 8 m;
- the Owner shall work with any purchaser of any Unit to determine their preference and docking needs and shall construct all docks as a condition of sale of the Units where a dock is permitted. As per condition 6 xi.(2), dock location and construction shall only occur following CRCA and/or MNRF permit issuance. This condition shall be included in the condominium agreement with the Township and the agreement of purchase and sale for all Units where a dock is permitted. xii. Joint use docks may be constructed on Unit 10 to provide shared docking for the owners of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15, subject to the following restrictions:
- The Owner’s qualified environmental professional, in cooperation with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, will identify a low/no impact 1.5 metre walkway to the joint use docking facility through the vegetated buffer on lot 10 generally in the location identified on Attachment “A” to the water’s edge. The walkway shall be constructed a minimum of 3m from the adjacent wetland Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 373 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 3 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
boundary and be delineated by a page wire fence. The Owner shall construct the joint use docks as a condition of sale of the first Unit that is permitted to use the joint use docks. This condition shall be included in the condominium agreement with the Township and the agreement of purchase and sale for all Units that are permitted to use the joint use dock; 2. The joint use docks may only be constructed in accordance with an approval provider; 3. The joint use docks must be floating, cantilever, or pole docks; 4. No aquatic vegetation shall be removed during construction, use or maintenance of any dock; 5. The owners of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15 will have exclusive use of the 0.31 ha small island located south of and between units 8 & 9 , and held in ownership by the Condominium Corporation; 6. Development on this small island will comply with Clause 6(v). The old corduroy road/path to the island shall be removed in accordance with the recommendations of a qualified environmental professional. The location of the dock shall be limited to the east side of the island. Permanent exclusionary fencing and signage shall be installed limiting access to the west side of the island. Signage will explain why no access to the west side of the island is permitted. Any deviation from these prescribed locations on Attachment ‘A’ may only be considered if in consultation with a qualified environmental professional to the satisfaction of the Township; 7. The owners of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15 will be permitted additional shared docking on this small island. All joint use docking on the island shall conform to the requirements of this condition; 8. The joint use docks shall be constructed so that they do not interfere with navigation and shall conform with the applicable zoning for docks. B. The Common Element Open Space shall be governed by Condominium Rules to, at a minimum and without limitation, prohibit the removal of any vegetation within this area and to prohibit the creation of walkways and structures. Use of the Common Element Open Space shall be restricted to “passive recreational uses” as defined in Condition 9A.
- On-Site Sewage Disposal and Water Systems: A. That the recommendations outlined in the letter dated September 3, 2014 from KFL&A Public Health to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality.
- Dock and Deck Access A. Subject to Condition 6(xi),that any dock that is placed at Unit 2 shall be located on the western shore of Unit 2 so that the dock is not located in Long Bay, but is on the open water of Loughborough Lake. Only one (1) dock shall be permitted to service Unit 2, all other existing docks shall be removed as a condition of site plan approval for the Unit. B. Subject to Condition 6(xi), only one (1) dock shall be permitted to service Unit 1, all other existing docks shall be removed as a condition of site plan approval for the Unit. C. That, in recognition that access to the open water of Long Bay from proposed Unit 6 is by way of an island within a wetland, a walking bridge be installed under the supervision of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to provide this access to Long Bay. Such walking bridge must be installed to the satisfaction of the CRCA and the Township prior to registration of the Description and vacant land condominium Agreement. Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 374 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 4 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
- Parkland Dedication: A. That Block 18, Common Element Parkland, be renamed a Common Element Open Space. The Common Element Open Space shall be governed by Condominium Rules to, at a minimum and without limitation, prohibit the removal of any vegetation within this area and to prohibit the creation of walkways and structures. Use of the Common Element Open Space shall be restricted to passive recreational uses and all motorized vehicles shall be prohibited. For the purposes of this section, “passive recreational uses” shall not include trails, hunting, motor boating, or use of any motorized vehicle. An overlook/viewing area shall be permitted in this Block; such overlook to be located adjacent to the private road and be subject to Site Plan Approval. B. That the owner convey up to five percent of the land included in the plan to the municipality for public park purposes. Alternatively, the municipality may require cash-in-lieu for all or a portion of the conveyance.
- Stormwater A. That the recommendations contained in the ‘Stormwater Management Brief for the Johnston Point Condominium Development’, undated, by Asterisk Engineering Corporation and associated drawings related to site drainage design, construction and maintenance, including construction of ditches and culverts, be included in the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement and that they be complied with to the satisfaction of the municipality. B. That all requirements and recommendations specified in the ‘Hydrogeological Assessment at Johnston’s Point’ report, dated June 2014 from WESA, and all associated drawings be included in the Vacant Land Condominium Agreement and that they be complied with to the satisfaction of the municipality. Human Remains: The condominium agreement shall contain a clause providing that any Owner(s) be advised, and also that a notice be placed in the purchase and sale agreement alerting any prospective purchasers that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction or site development of a lot, that the property owner shall immediately contact the OPP, the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Unit of the Ministry of Consumer Services (or the applicable agencies at the time of final approval).
- Archaeological Resources: A. That all recommendations of the Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1-4) Report by Abacus Archaeological Services be implemented to the satisfaction of the Township. B. That the applicant provide clearance letters for the Stage 1-4 Archaeological Assessments from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport. C. That if during the process of development any archaeological resources or human remains of Aboriginal interest are encountered, the Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office will be contacted immediately at: Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office 31 Riverside Drive, Suite 101 Pembroke, Ontario K8A 8R6 Telephone: (613) 735-3759 Fax: (613) 735-6307 email: algonquins@nrtco.net
- Utilities and On-Site Works A. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 375 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 5 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
i. The private road shall be posted with a 30 km/h speed limit placed to the satisfaction of the municipality; ii. a turtle crossing and education sign developed to the satisfaction of the municipality shall be installed on the private road near the southern end of lot 13; iii. the private road shall be maintained as a gravel surface only; for clarity, no future hard surface paving shall be permitted without additional environmental impact analysis; iv. a land owner education program and environmental sensitivity information package shall be developed and provided to every owner of a Unit and the clause shall be included in all agreements of purchase and sale for any unit enclosing the education information package; and v. a permanent exclusion fence shall be constructed on both sides of the private road along the frontage of lots 6 and 8, to the satisfaction of the municipality. B. That, prior to final approval, the portion of the unopened road allowance identified on the Plan through Units 12 and 13 and Block 17, be closed and the ownership transferred to the owner of the subject lands. C. That, prior to final approval, a garbage collection facility be installed at the entrance to the development near North Shore Road to the satisfaction of the Township. D. That, prior to final approval, any required Canada Post box be installed on the right-of-way for the lane near the entrance to the development at North Shore Road. E. That, prior to final approval, street lighting shall be installed to the Township’s satisfaction at the location for the Canada Post boxes and garbage collection area near North Shore Road. F. That, prior to final approval, street signage shall be installed according to Township standards and to the satisfaction of the municipality. G. Speed limit signs shall be erected at the water at the entrance to Long Bay advising that all watercraft shall adhere to a maximum 10 km/h speed limit H. That, prior to final approval, the municipality be satisfied that all servicing issues are resolved such as private lane construction and any required upgrades to North Shore Road. 13. Site Plan Control That the development of all Units shall be subject to site plan control approval. Site Plan Control applications shall be circulated to Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority for review and comment prior to Township approval. Prior to applying for any building permit the owner of any Unit shall obtain site plan control approval and enter into a site plan control agreement with the Township, which agreement shall include, but not be limited to, the following: i. An approved site plan showing the location of all structures, including the septic disposal system and well, consistent with the recommendations of the EIS; ii. A location for the alternate septic disposal system location, which location shall not be developed; iii. The location of any walkway to the water, where such walkway is permitted; iv. The location of any dock, where a dock is permitted; v. The location of any driveway; and vi. Notwithstanding condition 6 (iv), all living trees on each Unit greater than 4 inches diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal as part of Site Plan review. 14. Revisions to Draft Plan:
Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 376 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 6 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
A. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the Owner shall submit a revised Block Plan, if required, to reflect any significant alterations caused from this Draft Plan Approval. B. That where final engineering design(s) result in minor variations to the Plan (e.g., in the configuration of lots, etc.), these may be reflected in the Final Plan subject to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the County of Frontenac. 15. General conditions: A. That when requesting final Approval from the County of Frontenac, the Owner shall accompany such request with the required number of originals and copies of the Final Plan, together with a surveyor’s certificate stating that the lots/blocks thereon conform to the frontage and area requirements of the Zoning By-Law. B. That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed subdivision conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the zoning is satisfactory to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. C. That the Owner submit a draft Vacant Land Condominium Declaration for approval by the Township and County to ensure all conditions of approval will be satisfied 16. Clearance Letters: A. That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed development conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the zoning is satisfactory to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. B. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Township of South Frontenac the method by which conditions 1 to 14 have been satisfied. C. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by KFL&A Public Health the method by which condition 6A has been satisfied. D. That Prior to Final Condominium Approval, the County is to be advised in writing by the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority the method by which conditions 7 and 8 have been satisfied. 17. Lapsing Provisions: A. That pursuant to Section 51(32) of the Planning Act, this Draft Plan Approval shall lapse at the expiration of three (3) years from the date of issuance of Draft Plan Approval if final approval has not been given, unless an extension is requested by the Owner and, subject to review, granted by the approval authority. B. That pursuant to Section 51(33) of the Planning Act, the Owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension of the Draft Plan Approval. The extension period shall be for a maximum of three (3) years and must be submitted prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Approval. Further extensions may be considered at the discretion of the Township and the County.
Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 377 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 7 of 11
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Attachment “A” Conceptual Site Plan Unit, Path and Dock Locations
Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 378 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 8 of 11
9, 14 and 18
3m
6m
3m
8m
m 3.5
DOCKING AT SHARED ISLAND (BLOCK 19)
3m
m 23
COMMUNAL DOCK AT UNIT 9/10 BOUNDARY
TOTAL SITE AREA
m 7.5
1
JPTP13
P
P
A
A
JPTP12
JPTP11
36.84
6.00
Block 19
EXCLUSIVE USE
PROVINCIALLY SIGNIFICANT Units/Blocks 1, 6, WETLAND
Part of Block 18
OPEN SPACE/PARKLAND
0.31
2.72
Blocks 16-17
ROADS/STREETS
Part of
2.50
Units 1-15
RESIDENTIAL
AREA +/DENSITY (ha) 25.31 0.59
UNITS/BLOCKS
TW5
JPTP01
P
JPTP02
A
35m
ack
Setb
JPTP03
JPTP04
1010 PEBBLE
P A JPTP15
P
JPTP05
JPTP06
A
7m 10
118
m
TW4
A
300mm CULVERT
A
JPTP23
9m 23
P JPTP22 TW1
1m 15
P
P
8
TW3
A
JPTP10
JPTP09
A JPTP07 JPTP08
600mm CULVERT
JPTP25
BLOCK 18
JPTP24
ack Setb 60m
m 115
5m 10
JPTP16
50
m
JPTP19
m
K
77
ack ack Setb Setb 60m
C
B LO 17
12
A
LAND USE TABLE
13m
6m
117
m ack
JPTP18
60m Setb
P
LAND USE
3m
Page 379 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
17 0m
4m P
A
P
P
A
TW2
P
JPTP21
10
A
11
JPTP20
450mm CULVERT
92
k ac Se tb 60 m
tb ac k Se m
A P
45m 40 Set m b Set ack bac k
40
EMERALD
1101EMERALD
SUBJECT SITE
N
Shown on Draft Plan Shown on Draft Plan All adjacent lands owned, or in which the applicants have an interest are shown on the Key Plan Residential: Single Dwelling Units Residential: Rural / Single Dwelling Units Shown on Draft Plan Shown on Existing Conditions and Proposed Condominium Plan Private Wells Loam - shallow phase, loam, rock outcrop, shallow monteagle sandy loam, muck and peat Shown on Draft Plan Garbage collection, Telephone, Cable, Electricity Restrictive Covenants, Utility Easements
DATE
BY
O.L.S
DRAWN BY REVIEWED BY DATE SCALE
YL MK 2016.02.29 1:1400
108-6 Cataraqui Street Kingston ON K7K 1Z7 Tel: 613 542 5454 Fax: 613 730 1136 www.fotenn.com N
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
DRAWING
JOHNSTON POINT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT
MAGENTA WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
CLIENT
No. REVISION
1
2
3
DATE: JUNE 12, 2014
I CERTIFY THAT: PROPERTY PERIMETER IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING UNDERLYING SURVEY: 13R-13844
SURVEYOR’S CERTIFICATE
SIGNED:_____________ DATE: ________________
I, ______________ HERBY AUTHORIZE ________________________ TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT THIS PLAN TO THE COUNTY OF FRONTENAC FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
OWNER’S CERTIFICATE
j) k) l)
d) e) f) g) h) i)
a) b) c)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 51.17 (A-L) OF THE PLANNING ACT:
KEY PLAN
AGENDA ITEM #e)
A P
50m
76 m
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Attachment “B” 30 Metre Environmental Protection Area
Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
Page 380 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 9 of 11
688
AGENDA ITEM #e)
Page 381 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
Page 382 ofDevelopment 437 2019-065 Planning and Economic Extension of Approval of Draf…
no yes yes yes yes yes no no no no no no no no no
Conditions of Approval Johnston Point Plan of Condominium
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Unit No. waterfrontage long bay
yes yes no no no no no yes no yes yes no no yes no
waterfrontage main lake
Johnston Point Site Plan Matrix
yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes no yes yes no no yes no
individual dock permitted
20m2 20m2 15m2 15m2 15m2 15m2 n/a 20m2 n/a 20m2 20m2 n/a n/a 20m2 n/a
no no no no no no yes no yes no no yes yes no yes
Page 10 of 11
no no no no no no yes no yes no no yes yes no yes
yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes no yes yes no no yes no
no no no no no yes no no no no no no no no no
40 40 50 50 50 50 50 40 60 40 40 60 60 35 50
maximum shared shared 3 meter 1.5 m building dock size dock w/ 0.31 ha path to bridge to setback from easement island water island wetland/lake on unit 10
Attachment “C” Site Plan Matrix
45 50 50 60 60 60 60 45 60 60 60 60 60 35 60
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
septic Site details in setback Plan APS from Control wetland/lake
AGENDA ITEM #e)
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Report 2019-068 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Corporate Services – Approval of a Strategic Asset Management Policy
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services Approval of a Strategic Asset Management Policy report; And Further That the Clerk be authorized to bring forward a by-law later in the meeting to establish a formal Strategic Asset Management Policy attached to this report as Appendix A. Background The County is responsible for providing a range of essential services to the community, including land ambulance, long term care, land use planning, economic development, and Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry services. To deliver these services, it owns and manages a diverse municipal infrastructure asset portfolio of facilities, equipment, vehicles, machinery, recreational trails and bridges. As the social, economic, and environmental wellbeing of the community depends on the reliable performance of these municipal infrastructure assets it is critical to implement a systemic, sustainable approach to their management. Asset management refers to the set of policies, practices and procedures that allow an organization to realize maximum value from its municipal infrastructure assets. An asset management approach allows organizations to make informed decisions regarding the planning, building, operating, maintaining, renewing, replacing and disposing of
383 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
municipal infrastructure assets through a wide range of lifecycle activities. Furthermore, it is an organization-wide process that involves the coordination of activities across multiple departments and service areas. As such, it is useful to adopt a structured and coordinated approach to outlining the activities, roles and responsibilities, as well as the key principles that should guide all asset management decision-making. Comment A comprehensive and holistic asset management approach will support efficient and effective delivery of expected levels of service and ensure these practices are applied to the long-term management and stewardship of all municipal infrastructure assets. In addition, it will align the County with provincial standards and regulations such as the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 and Ontario Regulation 588/17, enabling the organization to take full advantage of available grant funding opportunities. The approval of this policy is an important step towards integrating the County’s strategic mission with its asset management program, and ensuring that critical municipal infrastructure assets and vital services are maintained and provided to the community in a reliable, sustainable manner. Attachments Appendix A Strategic Asset Management Policy Sustainability Implications The County must proactively manage its assets to best serve the Municipality’s objectives, including the following: Provide a consistent framework for implementing asset management throughout the organization Provide transparency and accountability to its stakeholders with evidencebased decision-making processes that align with strategic plans, budgets, service levels and risk management practices Prioritize the need for existing and future assets to effectively deliver services to the community and stakeholders Maintain prudent financial planning and decision-making Support sustainability and economic development Financial Implications There are no financial implications directly associated with the adoption of a Strategic Asset Management Policy. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Senior Leadership Team Alex Lemieux, Deputy Treasurer Kathie Shaw, Senior Financial Analyst Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – Approval of a Strategic Asset Management Policy June 19, 2019
384 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
Page 2 of 2
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 1 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Definitions: Unless otherwise noted, the definitions provided in this document align with those outlined in Ontario Regulation 588/17 (O. Reg. 588/17), Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure, under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015. Asset management (AM) – the coordinated activity of an organization to realize value from its assets. It considers all asset types, and includes all activities involved in the asset’s life cycle from planning and acquisition/creation; to operational and maintenance activities, rehabilitation, and renewal; to replacement or disposal and any remaining liabilities. Asset management is holistic and normally involves balancing costs, risks, opportunities and performance benefits to achieve the total lowest lifecycle cost for each asset. Asset management plan (AMP) – Documented information that specifies the activities, resources, and timescales required for an individual asset, or a grouping of assets, to achieve the organization’s asset management objectives. Capitalization threshold – the value of a municipal infrastructure asset at or above which a municipality will capitalize the value of it and below which it will expense the value of it. Green infrastructure asset – an infrastructure asset consisting of natural or humanmade elements that provide ecological and hydrological functions and processes and includes natural heritage features and systems, parklands, stormwater management systems, street trees, urban forests, natural channels, permeable surfaces and green roofs. Level of service – parameters, or combination of parameters, which reflect social, political, environmental and economic outcomes that the organization delivers. Parameters can include, but are not necessarily limited to, safety, customer satisfaction, quality, quantity, capacity, reliability, responsiveness, environmental acceptability, cost, and availability.
385 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 2 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Lifecycle activities – activities undertaken with respect to a municipal infrastructure asset over its service life, including constructing, maintaining, renewing, operating and decommissioning, and all engineering and design work associated with those activities. Municipal infrastructure asset – an infrastructure asset, including a green infrastructure asset, directly owned by a municipality or included on the consolidated financial statements of a municipality, but does not include an infrastructure asset that is managed by a joint municipal board. Purpose: A strategic asset management policy formalizes the Municipality’s commitment to asset management that aligns with strategic goals, provides leadership and commitment to the development and implementation of the County’s asset management program. It is intended to guide the consistent use of asset management practices across the organization while managing risk and implementing evidence-based decision-making on the management of municipal infrastructure assets to support the delivery of sustainable community services. This policy demonstrates an organization-wide commitment to the good stewardship of municipal infrastructure assets, and to improved accountability and transparency to the community through the adoption of best practices regarding asset management planning. By using sound asset management practices, the County aspires to ensure that municipal infrastructure assets meet expected performance levels and provide desired service levels in an efficient and effective manner. Background: The County is responsible for providing a range of essential services to the community, including land ambulance, long-term care, land use planning, economic development, and Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry services. To deliver these services, it owns and manages a diverse municipal infrastructure asset portfolio of facilities, equipment, vehicles, machinery, recreational trails and bridges. As the social, economic, and environmental wellbeing of the community depends on the reliable performance of
386 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 3 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
these municipal infrastructure assets it is critical to implement a systemic, sustainable approach to their management. Asset management refers to the set of policies, practices and procedures that allow an organization to realize maximum value from its municipal infrastructure assets. An asset management approach allows organizations to make informed decisions regarding the planning, building, operating, maintaining, renewing, replacing and disposing of municipal infrastructure assets through a wide range of lifecycle activities. Furthermore, it is an organization-wide process that involves the coordination of activities across multiple departments and service areas. As such, it is useful to adopt a structured and coordinated approach to outlining the activities, roles and responsibilities, as well as the key principles that should guide all asset management decision-making. A comprehensive and holistic asset management approach will support efficient and effective delivery of expected levels of service and ensure these practices are applied to the long-term management and stewardship of all municipal infrastructure assets. In addition, it will align the County with provincial standards and regulations such as the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 and Ontario Regulation 588/17, enabling the organization to take full advantage of available grant funding opportunities. Objectives: The County must proactively manage its assets to best serve the Municipality’s objectives, including the following:
Provide a consistent framework for implementing asset management throughout the organization
Provide transparency and accountability to its stakeholders with evidencebased decision-making processes that align with strategic plans, budgets, service levels and risk management practices
Prioritize the need for existing and future assets to effectively deliver services to the community and stakeholders Maintain prudent financial planning and decision-making Support sustainability and economic development
387 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 4 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Strategic Alignment: The County’s mission to provide the effective, efficient and sustainable delivery of services to citizens requires alignment of the many initiatives underway in our organization at any given time in order for it to be achieved. This alignment is necessary to properly consider whether the level of service provided by our existing and planned assets supports our mission. Asset management planning therefore will not occur in isolation from other municipal goals, plans, and policies. Rather, an integrated approach will be followed to successfully develop a practical asset management plan that aligns with our strategic plan, long range financial plan, budgeting strategies, Official Plan and our departmental master plans. Policy Statement: To guide the County, the following policy statements have been developed: The County will implement a municipal-wide asset management program that will promote lifecycle and risk management of the County’s capital infrastructure assets. A primary goal will be to achieve the lowest total cost of ownership while meeting desired levels of service. Levels of service refer to the outcomes or service attributes that the County aims to deliver for its stakeholders and can include both technical and qualitative components. The service rendered by an asset will be a determining factor of whether or not to include it in the asset management plan. The capitalization threshold used to determine which assets are included in the asset management plan is therefore a guideline. This qualitative approach is unlike the quantitative and dollar valuebased methodology prescribed in the tangible capital asset policy. The County will integrate asset management plans and practices with its longterm financial planning and budgeting strategies. This includes the development of financial plans that determine the level of funding required to achieve shortterm operating and maintenance needs, in addition to long-term funding needs to
388 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 5 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
replace and/or renew municipal infrastructure assets based on full lifecycle costing. The County will identify appropriate funding for its capital infrastructure and for financing service delivery. This may include taxation or user fee revenues, grant programs, debt-financing, public-private partnerships (P3), alternative financing and procurement (AFP), or the shared provision of services. The County will consider the risks and vulnerabilities of municipal infrastructure assets to climate change and the actions that may be required including, but not limited to, anticipated costs that could arise from these impacts, adaptation opportunities, mitigation approaches, disaster planning and contingency funding. Impacts may include matters relating to operations, levels of service and lifecycle management. The County will develop meaningful performance metrics and reporting tools to transparently communicate and display the current state of asset management practice to Council and the community. The County will align all asset management planning with the Province of Ontario’s land-use planning framework, including any relevant policy statements issued under section 3(1) of the Planning Act; shall conform with the provincial plans that are in effect on that date; and, shall be consistent with the County Official Plan. The County will develop processes and provide opportunities for stakeholders and other interested parties to offer input into the County’s asset management planning, where appropriate. The County will coordinate planning for interrelated municipal capital infrastructure assets with separate ownership structures by pursuing collaborative opportunities with neighbouring municipalities and jointly-owned municipal bodies wherever viable and beneficial. The County’s asset management plan will be updated at least every five years in accordance with O. Reg. 588/17 requirements, to promote, document and communicate continuous improvement of the asset management program.
389 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 6 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Guiding Principles The County will choose practices and operations that aim at reducing the lifecycle cost of asset ownership, while satisfying agreed levels of service. Decisions are based on balancing service levels, risks and cost. In addition, the County will consider all the assets in a service context and take into account their interrelationships as opposed to optimizing individual assets in isolation. The Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 sets out the following principles to guide asset management planning for municipalities in Ontario. The County will endeavor to incorporate these principles whenever possible into the day to day operation of the Municipality: Forward looking: The Municipality shall take a long-term view while considering demographic and economic trends in the region. Budgeting and planning: The Municipality shall take into account any applicable budgets or fiscal plans, including those adopted through Ontario legislation. Prioritizing: The Municipality shall clearly identify infrastructure priorities which will drive investment decisions. Economic development: The Municipality shall promote economic competitiveness, productivity, job creation, and training opportunities. Transparency: The Municipality shall be transparent by making information available to the public and base decisions on the publicly shared information, and in accordance with the County’s Transparency and Accountability policy as required under Section 270 of the Municipal Act. Consistency: The Municipality shall ensure the continued provision of core public services.
390 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 7 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Environmentally conscious: The Municipality shall endeavor to minimize the impact of infrastructure on the environment by respecting and helping to maintain ecological and biological diversity by augmenting resilience to the effects of climate change. Health and safety: The Municipality shall ensure that the health and safety of workers involved in the construction and maintenance of infrastructure assets is protected. Community focused: The Municipality shall promote community benefits including both social and economic, arising from infrastructure projects. The infrastructure projects are intended to improve the well-being of a community such as local job creation, improvement of public space within the community and promoting accessibility for persons with disabilities. Innovation: The Municipality shall create opportunities to make use of innovative technologies, services, and practices, particularly where doing so would utilize technology, techniques, and practices developed in Ontario. Integration: The Municipality shall where relevant and appropriate, be mindful and consider the principles and content of non-binding provincial or municipal plans and strategies established under an Act or otherwise, in planning and making decisions surrounding the infrastructure that supports them. Governance and Continuous Improvement The policy requires the commitment of key stakeholders within the Municipality’s organization to ensure the policy guides the development of a clear plan that can be implemented, reviewed and updated. Roles and Responsibilities The development and continuous support of the County’s asset management program requires a wide range of duties and responsibilities. The following passages outline the persons responsible for these tasks:
391 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #f)
Corporate Policy & Procedure Manual Subject:
Revision Date:
Strategic Asset Management Policy Policy
Index Number A09-ADM-012 Page 8 of 8
Approved:
Effective Date: June 19, 2019
Council i. Approve the AM policy and direction of the AM program ii. Maintain adequate organizational capacity to support the core practices of the AM program iii. Prioritize effective stewardship of assets in adoption and ongoing review of policy and budgets iv. Establish levels of service
Senior Management Team i. Development of policy and policy updates ii. Provide corporate oversight to goals and directions and ensure the AM program aligns with the County’s strategic plan iii. Ensure that adequate resources are available to implement and maintain core AM practices iv. Provide departmental staff coordination v. Develop and monitor levels of service and make recommendations to Council vi. Track, analyze and report on AM program progress and results
Executive Lead (Treasurer) i. Manage policy and policy updates ii. Provide organization-wide leadership in AM practices and concepts iii. Provide departmental staff coordination iv. Monitor levels of service v. Coordinate and track AM program implementation and progress
Departmental Staff i. Utilize the new business processes and technology tools developed as part of the AM program ii. Participate in implementation task teams to carry-out AM activities iii. Implement and maintain levels of service iv. Provide support and direction for AM practices within their department v. Track and analyze AM program progress and results
392 of 437of a Strategic Asset Management Pol… 2019-068 Corporate Page Services Approval
AGENDA ITEM #g)
Report 2019-069 Council Recommend Report To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Paul J. Charbonneau, Chief Paramedic/Director, Emergency & Transportation Services
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Emergency and Transportation Services – Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental
Recommendation That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Emergency and Transportation Services – Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac confirm that Option ____ is the intent of Motion #: 64-19. Background At its regular Council meeting on April 17, 2019 Council passed the following motions: a)
2019-038 Emergency and Transportation Services Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and Non-Government Organizations (NGOs);
Motion #: 64-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Councillor Martin
Page 393 of 437 Service Requests for Donation of S… 2019-069 Emergency and Transportation
AGENDA ITEM #g)
That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Emergency and Transportation Services - Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs); And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to include a step in the disposal procedure for the donation of a surplus ambulance, once a Council term, to local social/community agencies or any Non-Government Organizations (NGOs). And Further That Step 1 in the procedure be amended to offer once per council term the opportunity for the townships to acquire a surplus vehicle at no cost. And Further That if more than one township is interested, a bid process occur. Carried as Amended (See motion to Amend below which was Carried) Motion to Amend Motion #: 65-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Higgs Councillor Martin
Be It Resolved That the motion be amended to add the following: And Further That Step 1 in the procedure be amended to offer once per council term the opportunity for the townships to acquire a surplus vehicle at no cost. And Further That if more than one township is interested, a bid process occur. Carried Comment The Motion#: 64-19 as amended at the Council meeting of April 17, 2019 has created some confusion for staff. Council voted to add a step to the disposal process for the donation of an ambulance, once per Council term, to a local social/community agencies or any Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) at no cost and has amended Step 1 of the disposal process to include a donation of an ambulance to a member township, once per Council term at no cost. Staff would ask that Council clarify which option it intended: A) Is it the intent to allow for two (2) donations, per Council term, of an ambulance being one (1) to a member township at no cost and one (1) to a local social/community agencies or any Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) at no cost?; or Recommend Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services - Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 5
Page 394 of 437 Service Requests for Donation of S… 2019-069 Emergency and Transportation
AGENDA ITEM #g)
B) Is it the intent that a member township request for an ambulance at no cost, in Step 1, supersede a request from a local social/community agencies or any NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) at no cost? If Council choses Option A then the Council of the County of Frontenac is confirming the donation of a decommissioned ambulance to the Township of Frontenac Islands at no cost and that the Council of the County of Frontenac is confirming the request (Appendix A) for a donation of a decommissioned ambulance to Habitat for Humanity Kingston Limestone Region. If Council choses Option B then the Council of the County of Frontenac is confirming the donation of a decommissioned ambulance to the Township of Frontenac Islands at no cost and that the Council of the County of Frontenac is directing staff to inform Habitat for Humanity Kingston Limestone Region that their request (Appendix A) for the donation of an ambulance is denied. The revenue for the trade-in or sale value of surplus ambulances is part of the shared vehicle capital reserve calculations. This reserve is funded ~78% by the City of Kingston and ~22% by the County of Frontenac. A donation of an ambulance, at no cost, to a member township and/or a local social/community agencies or any Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) will affect the ongoing calculations of the transfer to reserves budget line. Sustainability Implications Good governance requires a high level of stewardship of County assets. There is also a need to ensure the supports provided by our social and community agencies can meet the needs of the people of Frontenac. The four pillars – social, cultural, economic and environmental – need to be in balance to achieve a sustainable community. Financial Implications Each year the County of Frontenac, Land Ambulance budget includes an amount under revenue for the trade-in or sale value of surplus ambulances. Our historical data indicates that the trade-in or sale value of a surplus ambulance has been between $5,000 and $10,000. This revenue may not be maximized if local social/community agencies were given a preferential purchase status within a minimum bid environment. However, it would be difficult to estimate what the actual loss of potential revenue might be. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer
Recommend Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services - Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 5
Page 395 of 437 Service Requests for Donation of S… 2019-069 Emergency and Transportation
AGENDA ITEM #g)
Appendix “A”
To:
Kelly Pender, CAO – Frontenac County
From: Cathy Borowec, CEO – Habitat for Humanity Kingston Limestone Region Date: April 8 2019 Re:
Request for donation of decommissioned ambulance
Habitat for Humanity Kingston Limestone Region is requesting that the County of Frontenac consider donating a decommissioned ambulance to support the homebuilding program that we offer. We would be using the ambulance for a mobile tool storage solution and a method to safely and efficiently transport building materials to our worksites. Habitat for Humanity’s vision is a world where everyone has a safe and decent place to live. Donating a decommissioned ambulance will provide Habitat with a resource that will assist in our continued efforts to mobilize community partners and volunteers in building affordable housing and helping local families find strength, stability and independence through affordable homeownership. In 2015, Northumberland County donated an ambulance to Habitat for Humanity and it has allowed them to expand their capacity and reach more local areas where housing is needed. We are following the leadership of Habitat Northumberland, who have recently been granted a second ambulance from the County. Meaghan Macdonald, executive director at Habitat Northumberland, says that their “…ambulance has been the perfect vehicle to meet Habitat’s unique needs and, ultimately, has helped to support more families. It provides the room, storage and covered space required to meet the diverse needs of delivering our construction and renovation programs in Northumberland.” Included below are some pictures of the Habitat Northumberland vehicle, rewrapped in Habitat branding, proudly displaying the County logo in recognition of the donation made. Habitat Kingston Limestone Region would make the same offer to include recognition for Frontenac County when we apply the Habitat branding to the exterior of the former ambulance. Your consideration of this request is truly appreciated. The support of community partners such as the Frontenac County is what ensures that our organization can help local families achieve strength, stability and independence. We would be proud to call Frontenac County a partner in helping us build hope for the future – one family, one community, one home at a time. Recommend Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services - Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 5
Page 396 of 437 Service Requests for Donation of S… 2019-069 Emergency and Transportation
AGENDA ITEM #g)
If there are any questions or requests for further information I am happy to oblige. I can be reached at cborowec@habitatkingston.com or by telephone at 613-548-8763 x203.
Recommend Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services - Requests for Donation of Surplus Ambulances to Local Agencies and NonGovernment Organizations (NGOs) - Supplemental June 19, 2019 Page 5 of 5
Page 397 of 437 Service Requests for Donation of S… 2019-069 Emergency and Transportation
AGENDA ITEM #h)
Report 2019-070 Council Recommend Report To:
Warden and Council
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Lisa Hirvi, Administrator, Fairmount Home
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Fairmount Home – Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement
Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for recommendation the Fairmount Home – Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac adopt the Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement as an integral part of operational practice, to be made known to every employee and volunteer, and to be made readily available to every staff member and volunteer for consistent reference and consultation. Background The Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement (Code) was first launched by Volunteer Canada to mark the International Year of Volunteers in 2001. The Code was revised in 2006 in partnership with the Volunteer Management Professionals of Canada and further revisions were made in 2012 and 2017. The Code contains updated standards, reflects the current social context and incorporates a more streamlined format. Using the Code as a benchmark, Volunteer Canada developed checklists, Putting The Code Into Action, and the online Code Audit tool to help organizations assess their volunteer involvement practices. The Code recognizes and reflects the changing realities of volunteer engagement and management practice, and supports the work of those who manage and support volunteer involvement within an organization.
of 437 2019-070 FairmountPage Home 398 Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement
AGENDA ITEM #h)
For volunteer involvement to be effective, the organization’s leaders must actively champion a culture and structure that supports and values the role and impact of volunteer involvement. The Code consists of three important elements: •
The value of volunteer involvement
•
Guiding principles that frame the relationship between the volunteer and organization
•
Standards of practice for involving individuals in meaningful ways to ensure successful integration of volunteers while meeting the needs of both the organization and its volunteers
By adopting the Code, organizations commit not only to strengthening their volunteer engagement strategy, but also to strengthening the capacity of the organization to meet its mandate and contribute to strong and connected communities. Comment Fairmount Home’s Volunteer and Special Events Coordinator is committed to ensuring that our volunteer program is progressive. Fairmount Home’s management team has reviewed the Code’s Values and Guiding Principles sections and is confident that they align with our mission, vision and core values. Upon the Council of the County of Frontenac’s adoption of the Code, a statement related to volunteer involvement will be prepared and published at Fairmount Home. The Volunteer and Special Events Coordinator will then work through the steps required to be listed as a Code adopter on Volunteer Canada’s website. Thereafter, periodic reviews will be completed to mark our progress and identify further opportunities for improvement. Sustainability Implications By adopting the Code, Fairmount Home demonstrates its commitment to its volunteers and our mission to be the home of choice for our residents, staff and volunteers. Financial Implications Not applicable Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Fairmount Home’s Management Team Karyn Price-Caird, Volunteer and Special Events Coordinator Volunteer Canada – Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement
Recommend Report to Council Fairmount Home – Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement June 19, 2019
of 437 2019-070 FairmountPage Home 399 Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement
Page 2 of 2
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Report 2019-071 Council Recommend Report To:
Warden and Council of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022
Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 20192022 report; And Further That the Clerk be authorized to bring forward a by-law later in the meeting adopting the Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 attached to this report as Appendix A. Background In September, 2018, County Council approved the issuance of a Request for Proposals for Consulting Services for the 2019-2022 Council Strategic Plan. In October of 2018, the CAO Performance Appraisal Review Panel, after a review of submissions and interviews with a short list of selected consultants, recommended to County Council that it retain the services of 8020 Info Inc. to take County Council through its 2019-2022 Strategic Planning exercise. Following an extensive consultation process by the successful proponents, 8020 Info Inc., which included online input from more than 200 residents across the Frontenacs, local consultations in public sessions with each member Township Council, as well as a presentation to County Council to allow members to provide input on each of the major strategic issues as well as determine their status in terms of being a priority of this Council, Council, at its regular meeting held May 15, 2019 received a draft 2019-2022 Strategic Plan and subsequently passed the following resolution, being Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer, clause d):
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief400 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
d)
2019-058 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022
Motion #: 87-19
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor MacDonald Councillor Martin
Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 20192022 report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac approve the Draft Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 attached to this report as Appendix A. And Further that the consultant be directed to incorporate in the final plan comments provided by Council, specifically on clearer emphasis on funding sources, finding efficiencies and transportation. Carried as Amended Comment The Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022, attached to this report as Appendix A, is a result of the changes made based on the Council resolution of May 15 as noted above which incorporates the comments provided by Council, specifically on clearer emphasis on funding sources, finding efficiencies and transportation. As part of this process, members of Council were provided with an individual opportunity to provide comments and feedback to the Clerk on the proposed changes; however at the writing of this report, no member of Council provided comments. Sustainability Implications Approving a strategic plan that is supported by a public consultation process will help ensure that community priorities are established and that scarce resources are allocated to those priorities. Financial Implications There are no financial implications directly associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Senior Leadership Team Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement/GIS Rob Wood, 8020 Info Inc.
Recommend Report to Council Office of the Chief Administrative Officer - Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 June 19, 2019
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief401 Administrative
Page 2 of 2
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 Introduction
This plan provides comprehensive direction for the County and guides how it will accomplish key strategic priorities in need of special attention, effort or resources over the current term of Council. Frontenac County ranges over an almost 4,000-square-kilometre rural area, with a population of 26,677 residents plus seasonal visitors, surrounding a city of more than 125,000. Life in the Frontenacs is connected to Kingston’s urban centre via employment, healthcare and educational services. The County also operates within a larger provincial, national and even international context. Considerations of this character, the operating environment, and extensive input from township councils and the public, have framed development of the strategies and action objectives that follow.
Index
Executive Summary ………………………………………………… Page 2 The Strategy Development Process ………………………….. Page 4 A Vision for the County of Frontenac ………………………….. Page 5 Forces for Change: Situation Analysis………………………… Page 6 Strategic Priority 1: Build Community Vitality/Resilience .. Page 7 Priority 2: New Funding and Critical Infrastructure ……….. Page 8 Priority 3: Champion/Coordinate Collaborative Solutions Page 9 Implementation Overview …………………………………………. Page 10
Page 1 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief402 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Executive Summary — Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 The Guiding Vision for Frontenac County The County of Frontenac is committed to sustaining diverse, strong, and resilient rural communities known for their unique natural environment and lifestyle choices.
The County of Frontenac Mission (Statement of Purpose) The effective, efficient and sustainable delivery of services to citizens.
Strategic Priorities for 2019-2022
- Get behind plans that build community vitality
and resilience in times of growth and change. •
Provide committed leadership and continuing support to the long-term regional plan to enhance broadband and cell service.
•
Refine and invest in efforts to accelerate economic development — to grow businesses, attract more visits and expand the tax base.
•
Pursue proactive planning approaches that reflect local concerns and priorities within strategic regional planning policy so as to enhance service levels, manage rising demand for new housing and deal with new types of development.
- Explore new funding sources and invest wisely in critical long-term infrastructure. •
To meet the needs of future capital projects, explore new sources of funding support (current and future progams), cost-sharing options and other potential economies.
•
Design a framework, explore options and initiate plans for development of a long-term care facility that will meet Fairmount Home’s mandate.
•
Develop plans within a changing legislative and service delivery landscape to provide additional facilities for Frontenac Paramedics that will effectively meet steadily growing demand for services and accommodate more paramedic training.
•
Finalize plans and financing to replace/construct/renovate aging County buildings now used for administration services (through a shared admin facility if possible).
•
Explore a collaborative upper-tier role for the County in securing potential funding and support for township maintenance of roads & bridges in a regional road system.
Page 2 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief403 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Executive Summary continued /…
- Champion and coordinate collaborative efforts with partners
to resolve complex problems otherwise beyond the reach of individual mandates and jurisdictions. •
Work with the townships, other municipalities and levels of government on broad infrastructure issues — ranging from environmental concerns to regional transportation strategies for residential, social and economic purposes, and access to funding.
•
Play a leadership role on communications to promote shared messaging for all regional initiatives such as economic development, tourism and lifestyle opportunities, and broadband and cell services.
•
Continue to pursue collaborative opportunities to achieve service and cost efficiencies and other economies through cost-sharing and shared services.
Current and Potential Project Partners • Townships • City of Kingston • Other counties • CRCA, Public Health, CFDC, KFPL libraries, EOWC, EORN, & other partners
Other Important and Continuing County Priorities: ◼ Respect the taxpayer and keep tax increases close to the rate of inflation. ◼ Implement strategic plans for Fairmount Home and Frontenac Paramedics. ◼ Continually improve customer and financial services. ◼ Maintain a strong organization and positive work culture through leadership, human resources, training and development, physical and IT infrastructure, and partnerships.
Page 3 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief404 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Extensive consultation attracted online input from more than 210 residents across the Frontenacs (including 71 seasonal residents). Local consultations were conducted with each of the four township councils in public session. The process was also supported by media coverage.
Overview of Strategy Development Process: The strategy development process was launched in January 2019 with a “Commissioning” Session with County Council members. Initial ideas, interests and concerns were further explored through background research, reviewing reports, business plans and related documents and a planning workshop with senior County staff in February. Through late February and March, public consultation meetings were held with the four township councils in North, Central and South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands. Extensive online input was received throughout March in response to a community survey promoted in all four township communities (more than 210 responses, including 71 from seasonal residents). All of this input was compiled and presented to County Council as part of its half-day prioritysetting workshop held March 27. Based on direction from that session, along with further follow-up work with staff, a draft plan was developed for review by Council May 15. The final revised draft was presented for approval June 19, 2019.
Page 4 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief405 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
A VISION for the County of Frontenac A vision statement provides a clear and succinct description of goals for what the organization and/or community should look like once it achieves its full potential. It also involves a blend of aspirations that preserve “the core” while stimulating progress.
As the County looks to the future, it envisions: The County of Frontenac is committed to sustaining diverse, strong, and resilient rural communities known for their unique, pristine natural environment and lifestyle choices. •
The County is a vibrant community of diverse friendly people from all walks of life. The beauty of Frontenac is in the landscape but the strength is in its people, from the northern-most tip to the islands. These characteristics define our sense of place.
•
The County aims to support the people of Frontenac and serve as the voice for our rural community lifestyle.
•
The County of Frontenac facilitates those living, visiting and doing business to experience the diversity of the region and all that it has to offer in areas of tourism, agriculture, forestry, services and government.
•
It also recognizes the unique and distinct characteristics of its four townships and how each contributes to the rich culture of the County.
As a framework for strategic planning, this future vision incorporate goals related to: • • • • • • •
Working collaboratively with partners to resolve complex issues beyond individual mandates or jurisdictions. Expanding the network of broadband and cell services. Supporting community vitality through services, infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Effective management of long-term care, emergency services, planning, community and economic development. Completing major capital projects related to Fairmount Home, Frontenac Paramedics and administrative offices. Building the County’s organizational capacity in line with its mandate and accountabilities. Maintaining a sustainable financial framework that respects the taxpayer and manages risks.
Page 5 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief406 Administrative
Frontenac County’s Balanced Scorecard Four key elements: • Customer Focus • Financial Performance • Learning and Growth • Process Improvement
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Forces for Change: Highlights from the Situation Analysis Strategic priorities for Frontenac County have been developed within the context of its character, location and many issues creating opportunities as well as pressures for change. Some implications from online input/public consultations: •
There is an expectation that local government (either tier) will protect and enhance quality of life in local communities. Common sense approaches are expected. Residents are less concerned about which level of government delivers a particular service or addresses a particular problem — they just want it dealt with. There is often confusion about “who does what”, suggesting communications will be an ongoing need.
•
The County is making strategic decisions within a general climate of uncertainty and change — in provincial/federal policy, funding and program expectations; economic and environmental trends; and changes in how we ‘look after ourselves and our neighbours’. The County must remain nimble — able and ready to react to changing political landscapes for some core services by monitoring provincial demands through regional networks and consultations with politicians, operating high quality services using best practices, and having a complete understanding of its revenues and expenditures to ensure County taxpayer interests are respected.
•
Feedback conveyed a general, pragmatic desire for protection of the natural environment and a sense we should all ‘do our part’ in addressing impacts of climate change.
•
There is a drive for greater efficiency in delivering public services together with tapping into new opportunities (especially using technology). This is coupled with a desire to preserve unique characteristics of each community and traditional ways of doing things.
Municipalities across the County are feeling the weight of infrastructure maintenance, with increasing pressures on finances (particularly for aging County facilities, including longterm care, administrative offices, land ambulance stations and land improvements). County strategy is also influenced significantly by funding from other levels of government. The county’s economic future is seen as more focused on smaller enterprises and ‘local’ activity. Smaller businesses are also seen as a vital element of the community fabric with small shops providing amenities to supplement other local infrastructure such as schools. Community halls and volunteer groups contribute to the ‘community fabric’ too. Local demographic trends may be amplifying well-known challenges (e.g. aging, leading to more healthcare and different housing needs; young people leaving for employment elsewhere; managing growth in new housing; or accessibility of vital services). Solutions to many issues transcend local government mandates – waste management, a township responsibility, is just one example. Consultations indicated an emerging sense that the only way to deal effectively with these types of issues is to band together, using a common voice and economies of scale to effect change (to improve broadband and cell service, for example) and for common efforts in marketing/branding and development.
Page 6 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief407 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
1
Get behind plans that build community vitality and resilience in times of growth and change.
This priority responds to high interest as well as concern shared broadly across the County that communities in the Frontenacs be well supported with infrastructure and services essential to vitality and sustainability in today’s world. Filling gaps in broadband and cell service was a top concern identified in public consultations. Many pointed to economic activity, local employment and services provided by businesses as key ingredients for vitality. This strategy also responds to the pressures for managing growth, housing and development wisely, in ways that are sensitive to local values and priorities. Objectives in support of this strategy: •
Provide committed leadership and continuing support to the long-term regional plan to enhance broadband and cell service.
•
Refine and invest in efforts to accelerate economic development — to grow businesses, attract more visits and expand the tax base.
•
Pursue proactive planning approaches that reflect local concerns and priorities within strategic regional planning policy so as to enhance service levels, manage rising demand for new housing and deal with new types of development.
Direction for Development of Operational Plans: •
It is understood that designing, costing and implementing connectivity/broadband projects is a long-term effort requiring years for preparation and implementation.
•
The County will continue to support the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus, Eastern Ontario Leadership Council and EORN, which have made digital connectivity their top priority, especially as ‘foundational’ infrastructure for economic development.
•
Current economic development initiatives relate to business expansion, investment attraction, supporting assessment growth, promoting the regional brand and advancing community improvement plans. Focus on the Economic Development Charter and the Ambassador and Trail Asset programs will continue. Recent pilot projects (such as the Open Farms local food awareness event) establish a basis for further progress.
•
In planning, major policy reviews are pending (e.g. private roads, official plan updates, community improvement plans, secondary and servicing plans, population projections and the Communal Services study). Priorities include working collaboratively with townships to enhance service levels and implementing strategic regional planning.
Page 7 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief408 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
2
Explore new funding sources and invest in critical long-term infrastructure using sound judgement.
This priority speaks to significant future demands on the County’s capital and operating budgets — the need to repair, reconstruct and/or replace aging service facilities and accelerate maintenance of other infrastructure. For this term of Council, the strategy marks a commitment to begin long-term planning to secure new sources of external funding, explore options to meet County responsibilities for long-term care infrastructure/facilities, and find cost-effective ways to deal with long overdue space and maintenance needs for paramedics and administrative services. Objectives in support of this strategy: •
To meet the needs of future capital projects, explore new sources of funding support (current and future progams), cost-sharing options and other potential economies.
•
Design a framework, explore options and initiate plans for development of a long-term care facility that will meet Fairmount Home’s mandate.
•
Develop plans within a changing legislative and service delivery landscape to provide additional facilities for Frontenac Paramedics that will effectively meet steadily growing demand for services and accommodate more paramedic training.
•
Finalize plans and financing to replace/construct/renovate aging County buildings now used for administration services (through a shared admin facility if possible).
•
Explore a collaborative upper-tier role for the County in securing potential funding and support for township maintenance of roads & bridges in a regional road system.
Direction for Development of Operational Plans: •
Pressures for budget increases are being driven by increasing demand for services; inflationary, contracted and mandated costs; plus new government policies/regulations.
•
Fairmount Home is a home of choice (more than 200 on the waiting list), but the building is aging and will require significant renovation by 2025. Maintenance costs are increasing, the septic system is aging, and electrical, plumbing and HVAC require significant repairs. Other changes will be required to adapt to changing care demands. Provincial funding and need for efficiencies may lead to a need for a larger size (e.g. minimum 160 beds).
•
The County has been engaged for some time in exploring potential cost savings and other benefits by way of sharing rejuvenated administration office space with the CRCA.
•
With debentures retiring in 2022, tax room for capital projects could increase. It may be time to review the .65% capital increment to assess its capacity to fund future projects.
•
In Frontenac County, responsibility for roads and bridges lies with the townships. These services were devolved in 1998 with the County’s restructuring agreement. Consultations with townships have raised the possibility of Frontenac County playing some role to help them access and maximize a share of upper government funding that may be available.
Page 8 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief409 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #i)
3
Champion and coordinate collaborative efforts with partners to resolve complex problems otherwise beyond the reach of their individual mandates and jurisdictions.
As a priority for this term of Council, the County will provide leadership in coordinating joint action with townships, the City of Kingston and other partners to develop solutions to complex problems otherwise beyond the reach of their individual formal mandates and jurisdictions. As opportunity or need arises from time to time, it will partner to develop action-focused collaborations of defined scope and duration to advocate for and implement solutions. Objectives in support of this strategy: •
Work with the townships, other municipalities and levels of government on broad infrastructure issues — ranging from environmental concerns to regional transportation strategies for residential, social and economic purposes, and access to funding.
•
Play a leadership role on communications to promote shared messaging for all regional initiatives such as economic development, tourism and lifestyle opportunities, and broadband and cell services.
•
Continue to pursue collaborative opportunities to achieve service and cost efficiencies and other economies through cost-sharing and shared services.
Direction for Development of Operational Plans: •
•
•
This priority builds on past successes the County has had with a collaborative approach in promoting a County identity, sharing back-office functions with townships and other partners, and advancing the region’s interests externally through channels such as the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus. Consultation feedback suggested that consideration be given to “what works” and “who could best deliver” various services provided by the County, townships and the City. This might be a network/consortial model rather than a traditional, hierarchical approach, with a focus on leaner administration. The challenge will be to find the right balance between a) centralization and local/ partner autonomy, b) seizing collaborative opportunities without disrupting existing jurisdictions and responsibilities, c) finding payoffs for all the partners involved, and d) developing a sustainable model to enable the County to play such a role.
Page 9 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief410 Administrative
Collaborative Leadership Opportunities • Transportation • Promoting the Frontenacs • Environmental awareness • Waste Management • Seeking funding • Sharing services
AGENDA ITEM #i)
Implementation Overview: Strategy is activated through operational plans that provide more specific direction for the work and identify responsibilities and timelines — detailing who will do what by when. The County of Frontenac will be developing specific workplans that respond to its future challenges and opportunities and translate the strategic priorities outlined above into ongoing activities and initiatives. Related best practices in the areas of budget strategy, risk management, change management, capacity building, partnership relations and policy development would also be employed. Continuous Improvement: The County will continue to build a culture of continuous improvement through participation in Lean/Six Sigma projects at all levels of of the organization. Regular reporting of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will also be used to reflect implementation of the strategic plan. Communications: A successful roll-out of this strategic plan will depend on effective two-way communications and related efforts to develop understanding of its implications, both by internal audiences at the County as well as residents and ratepayers, employers, community partners, townships, the City of Kingston, and other levels of government. Periodic Review: As with any well-managed implementation, progress on these strategic priorities will be reviewed regularly. Operational plans will be updated when necessary (as will the strategic plan itself, as appropriate from time to time). This will help ensure the County of Frontenac continues to anchor its activities in the municipality’s mission and vision, adapt to the latest evidence and best practices, and respond effectively to circumstances as they may change through 2022 and beyond.
Page 10 of 10
Page of 437 Officer Frontenac County Str… 2019-071 Office of the Chief411 Administrative
AGENDA ITEM #j)
Report 2019-072 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Natural Heritage Policies in the County Official Plan – Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest
Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the report Planning and Economic Development – Natural Heritage Policies in the County Official Plan – Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac include the review of Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs) in the work plan for the County Official Plan update in 2020-2021. Introduction As described in the County Official Plan, the Frontenac region covers a large geographic area which is comprised of a rich natural environment that makes the region a unique place to live, work and play. A natural heritage system is defined as an ecologically based delineation of nature and natural function that encompass or incorporate natural features, functions and linkages as component parts within them and across the landscape. Section 7.1.4.2 Significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) in the County Official Plan contains policies that recognize the importance and value of regionally and provincially significant ANSIs in the natural environment. North Frontenac Township has been working on a comprehensive update to its Zoning Bylaw which commenced in early 2018. The update is nearing completion and the goal of the Township Council is to approve the Bylaw this year. During this process, members of the public have expressed opposition to the identification of the Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest identified on the Zoning Map, with particular focus on the designation of the regionally significant ANSI west of Ompah in the Former Township of Palmerston, known as the
Page 412 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
AGENDA ITEM #j)
Palmerston Lake ANSI. In addition to concerns about the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry protocol for the identification and classification of ANSIs, members of the public in North Frontenac expressed concern with the fact that the County Official Plan recognizes the importance and value of both regionally and provincially significant ANSIs. On May 6, 2019, the Frontenac County Planning Advisory Committee received a deputation from Mr. Darwyn Sproule regarding Township of North Frontenac citizen concerns over Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI). The following resolution was passed at the May 6 meeting which was received and adopted at the May 15, 2019 County Council meeting: Moved By: Seconded By:
Mr. Leonard Councillor Vandewal
That Council directs planning staff to prepare a report for the June 2019 County Council meeting that: i. Provides rationale for the inclusion of Regional and Provincial Significant ANSIs in the County Official Plan; and ii. Provides an overview of the process for an Official Plan Amendment including the Planning Act framework and the anticipated timelines. Carried Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) The 2014 Provincial Policy Statement defines Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest as areas of land and water containing natural landscapes or features that have been identified as having life science or earth science values related to protection, scientific study, or education. ANSIs play an important role in the protection of Ontario’s natural heritage. MNRF identifies two types of ANSIs (life science and earth science) on the basis of scientific surveys of the province’s ecodistricts. Because these identified ANSIs are a critical complement to provincial parks and conservation reserves, such ANSIs represent important natural features that are not found in protected areas. In addition, ANSIs provide a focus for both public and private sectors to contribute to the protection of Ontario’s natural heritage. Further information regarding ANSI identification can be found in the Natural Heritage Reference Manual; information regarding the identification of ANSIs can be found in the Identification and Confirmation Procedure for Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest.
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – ANSI and Natural Heritage June 19, 2019
Page 413 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
Page 2 of 6
AGENDA ITEM #j)
The County of Frontenac Natural Heritage Study, completed December 2012, identifies 34 Life Science ANSIs and 11 Earth Science ANSIs (including 4 candidate sites) across the County. The target identified in the study is for the protection of both regionally significant ANSIs in the same manner as provincially significant ANSIs and that they be managed for the long-term in cooperation with the MNR using provincial and municipal policies. Planning Analysis Legislated Framework – Planning Act The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, is provincial legislation that sets out the ground rules for land use planning in Ontario. Section 3 of the Act states that the Minister may from time to time issue policy statements that have been approved on matters relating to municipal planning that in the opinion of the Minister are of provincial interest. In respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter, Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions affecting planning matters “shall be consistent with” policy statements issued under the Act. Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 The Provincial Policy Statement provides direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 2.1 Natural Heritage states that natural features and areas shall be protected for the long term. Section 2.1.5 states that development and site alteration shall not be permitted in: e) significant areas of natural and scientific interest unless it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on natural features or their ecological functions. Further, Section 2.1.8 states that development and site alteration shall not be permitted on adjacent lands to the natural heritage features and areas identified in policies 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.1.6 unless the ecological function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on their ecological functions. The Provincial Policy Statement, 2014, supports improved land use planning and management, which contributes to a more effective and efficient land use planning system. The policies of the PPS may be complemented by provincial plans or by locallygenerated policies regarding matters of municipal interest. Municipal official plans provide a framework for comprehensive, integrated, place-based and long-term planning that supports and integrates the principals of strong communities, a clean and healthy environment and economic growth, for the long term. The policies of the PPS represent minimum standards. The PPS does not prevent planning authorities and decision-makers from going beyond the minimum standards established in specific policies, unless doing so would conflict with any policy of the Provincial Policy Statement.
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – ANSI and Natural Heritage June 19, 2019
Page 414 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
Page 3 of 6
AGENDA ITEM #j)
County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016 The County of Frontenac Official Plan is a framework for guiding development in the County through the management and protection of the natural environment and by providing direction and influence on growth patterns. In Ontario, all planning decisions must conform to the County and Township Official Plans. Section 7.1.4.2 of the County of Frontenac Official Plan identifies ANSIs as a critical complement to Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves as they represent important natural features that are not found in protected areas. The County recognizes the importance and value of regionally and provincially significant ANSIs and supports their protection. The Township Official Plans shall identify and protect those regionally or provincially significant ANSIs where no development shall be permitted in or adjacent to them unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the ANSI and its ecological function. Link to County of Frontenac Official Plan The policy of protecting both regional and provincially significant ANSIs at the same level was part of the recommendations made in the Frontenac County Natural Heritage Study (2012). The goals of the Natural Heritage Study included increasing the understanding of natural heritage features and systems across the Frontenacs, develop land use planning information and policies that identify, protect and enhance the County’s natural heritage features and systems, as well as recognize links between natural heritage features and systems. Appendix “1A” – Natural Heritage System of the County Official Plan outlines the key linkages throughout the County. The study identified a total of 45 ANSIs in Frontenac County: 32 Provincially Significant and 13 Regionally Significant. One of the reasons for treating the two types of ANSIs at the same level of protection is that a majority of these ANSIs form part of the regional linkage system that connect natural heritage areas within Frontenac and to other systems outside the County (as illustrated in Appendix 1A of the County Plan). The County used a similar approach in enshrining the 30 metre waterfront setback in the regional plan to ensure that all four Townships must meet this minimum standard, recognizing that waterfront protection is important to protecting water quality in all of the lakes and rivers in Frontenac. The PPS allows for planning authorities to exceed standards of provincial land use policy. Section 4.9 of the PPS states: “The policies of this Provincial Policy Statement represent minimum standards. This Provincial Policy Statement does not prevent planning authorities and decision-makers from going beyond the minimum standards established in specific policies, unless doing so would conflict with any policy of this Provincial Policy Statement.”
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – ANSI and Natural Heritage June 19, 2019
Page 415 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
Page 4 of 6
AGENDA ITEM #j)
Public consultation was an important part of the process in developing these policies. Two open houses were held prior to completing the 2012 Natural Heritage Study. Four drafts were prepared as part of the County Official Plan process, and consultation included ten open houses, three presentations to each Township Council, and more than 100 responses to an on-line survey. County Official Plan Amendment Any amendments to the County Official Plan must be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and supported with planning rationale. Ontario Regulation 543/06 Official Plans and Plan Requirements set out the process for an amendment to an official plan. All information and materials as part of the Official Plan Amendment process must be available to the public for review including the specific text changes proposed, additional relevant information/studies, and any amendments to the land use schedule. O Reg. 543/06 explains the prescribed notice requirements including where notice is required to be placed and the agencies and commenting bodies required to be circulated. Section 8.4 Public Participation of the County Official Plan sets out additional objectives for consultation. The document states that, “Council shall consult with the public for amendments to and reviews of the Plan. The consultation process shall include the provision of adequate information in a timely manner, as well as opportunities for members of the public, review agencies, and other stakeholders to discuss this information with County staff and to present views to Council and to Township Councils.” The removal of the protection of regionally significant ANSIs is a County-wide issue. As such, planning staff would recommend an engagement plan that included consultation across the region. Conclusion A natural heritage system is a network of interconnected natural features; as such, planning staff are recommending that policies regarding Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest not be dealt with in isolation. Recognizing that the County Natural Heritage Study was completed in 2012, the Planning Department work plan identifies an update to the Natural Heritage Study in 2020, with the intent that the updated study will inform the County Official Plan review to commence in 2021. Both the Natural Heritage Study update and Official Plan review will include consultation across the region with a minimum of four open houses or public meetings to be set by the Planning Advisory Committee. Recently (February 15, 2019), the Minister of Municipal Affairs wrote to all municipalities with respect to land use planning. The Minister wrote that the government is, “reviewing the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement to ensure they are calibrated to achieve our streamlining and housing supply objectives.” The Minister also noted that municipalities “…may consider an interim pause on some planning decisions or reviews of major planning documents … until this work is completed.” AS part of the Province’s review it is expected that a new Provincial Policy Statement will be released in late 2019 Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – ANSI and Natural Heritage June 19, 2019
Page 416 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
Page 5 of 6
AGENDA ITEM #j)
or early 2020 for consultation. It would be premature to proceed with a County Official Plan amendment in the absence of understanding the Province’s direction for land use planning across Ontario. Further, to prioritize an update to the Natural Heritage Study would require shifts to the approved work plan and may require additional staff capacity. Financial Implications Council allotted $60,000 for the completion of the 2012 Natural Heritage Study; the project proposal for the 2020 Budget will include a projected cost for the study update. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected County of Frontenac Corporate Services County of Frontenac Planning Advisory Committee Township of North Frontenac
Recommend Report to Council Planning and Economic Development – ANSI and Natural Heritage June 19, 2019
Page 417 ofDevelopment 437 2019-072 Planning and Economic Natural Heritage Policies in …
Page 6 of 6
AGENDA ITEM #k)
Report 2019-073 Recommend Report to Council To:
Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac
From:
Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Richard Allen, Manager of Economic Development
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Planning and Economic Development – Request for Fencing and permission to plant trees along K&P Trail at Masonville Road.
Recommendation Be It Resolved That staff be directed to enter into an agreement with Mr. James De Vries to permit Mr. DeVries to construct a 60m wood fence along the K&P Trail and Masonville Lane and to plant trees along the K&P Trail adjacent to the property located at 1006 Masonville Lane; And Further That the County provide 50% funding for fencing materials to a limit of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) to be funded from the 2019 K&P Trail Operating Budget. Background On April 1, 2019 staff received an online form submission from Mr. James De Vries at 1006 Masonville Lane requesting fencing along the K&P Trail at his property. This section of the K&P Trail is located adjacent to Craig Road, and can appear to be an access point for ATV users travelling on the detour route seeking the motorized access point to the trail located 1.2 km further along the road. In addition, both motorized and non-motorized trail users may leave the trail at this location crossing the grassy area and potentially damaging this space.
Page 418 ofDevelopment 437 2019-073 Planning and Economic Request for Fencing and permi…
AGENDA ITEM #k)
Proposed fence
Figure 1: The Frontenac K&P Trail (Blue) at 1006 Masonville Lane (Yellow).
Comment On April 3, 2019 staff met with Mr. De Vries at 1006 Masonville Lane to discuss his request and to develop a solution to the related issues. Mr. De Vries indicated that some fencing would assist in keeping trail users on the track bed, and that he is interested in planting a small set of fruit trees in the space owned partially by himself and partially by the County between the Trail and Craig Road Staff are supportive of this proposal. Fencing Previous decisions with regard to fencing along the K&P Trail have been made according to the following framework decided by motion by County Council on March 15, 2017:
Recommend Report Planning and Economic Development – Request for Fencing and permission to plant trees along K&P Trail June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 3
Page 419 ofDevelopment 437 2019-073 Planning and Economic Request for Fencing and permi…
AGENDA ITEM #k)
That with respect to fencing abutting County owned trail lands, the County of Frontenac confirm as follows:
- In accordance with the Line Fences Act, Sec 20, where a land owner provides proof of farming activities and where trail lands were purchased from a railway company, that the County will be 100% responsible for the construction and maintenance of fencing along the property line;
- Where a land owner provides proof of farming activities and where trail lands were purchased from a person or entity other than a railway company, that the County will be 50% responsible for the construction and maintenance of fencing along the property line, with the property owner having the choice of sharing equally in the construction and installation or the fence or having the County supply the fence;
- Where special circumstances warrant a fence abutting where farming activities are not present, Council will make an individual determination on a case by case basis; and Notwithstanding any of the above, the rights of any property owner to exercise their rights under the Line Fences Act remain As farming activities are not present in this proposal, Council is required to make a determination on a situational basis. Staff are recommending that the County provide 50% funding for fencing materials to construct a 60m wood fence along the K&P Trail and Masonville Lane. Mr. De Vries will provide the labour for this construction. This cost for the County is not expected to exceed $1,000. Trees As Mr. De Vries plans to plant fruit trees on land owned by the County, it is recommended that staff enter into a partnership agreement with Mr. De Vries, indicating that trees planted on County property will become County property and that Mr. De Vries is responsible for the maintenance of these trees. Sustainability Implications Establishing partnerships is an important strategy for the County to provide the best value around strategic initiatives such as the K&P Trail. As the K&P Trail involves many communities, businesses and stakeholders, it is ideal that these stakeholders participate and lead in the many initiatives to establish a successful trail community. Financial Implications The funds for fencing requested are available as part of the 2019 K&P Trail Operating Budget. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Corporate Services Mr. James De Vries, 1006 Masonville Lane Recommend Report Planning and Economic Development – Request for Fencing and permission to plant trees along K&P Trail June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 3
Page 420 ofDevelopment 437 2019-073 Planning and Economic Request for Fencing and permi…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Report 2019-067 Council Information Report To:
Warden and Council
From:
Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer
Prepared by:
Lisa Hirvi, Administrator, Fairmount Home
Date of meeting:
June 19, 2019
Re:
Fairmount Home – Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding Announcements for 2019-20 Funding Year
Recommendation Not applicable Background Case Mix Index (CMI): On May 29, 2019, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (“Ministry”) released a memo regarding the CMI results for 2019-20 (see attached). The following are the highlights of the announcement: •
There were no changes to the CMI methodology, which continues to apply the 5% Special Rehabilitation (SR) Limit, re-indexing factor and -5% Stability Floor on the year-over-year funded CMI
•
The CMI is applied only to the Nursing and Personal Care (NPC) funding envelope, which is consistent with previous years
•
CMI results will be applied effective August 1, 2019, rather than April 1
Level-of-Care Base Funding: On May 30, 2019, the Ministry released a letter regarding increases to the Level-of-Care (LOC) base funding for the long-term care home sector (see attached). The Ministry stated that it is investing 1.7% more in long-term care this year, which includes investments in more specialized services, specifically high-acuity priority access beds and behavioural support units. The changes applicable to Fairmount are as follows:
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 421 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
•
Changes effective April 1, 2019 o Non-CMI adjusted global increase of $1.77 per diem, which can be applied to NPC, Program and Support Services (PSS), Raw Food (RF) and/or Other Accommodation (OA) with OA limited to 32% of the per diem o Physiotherapy program funding will be converted to $2.27 per diem and allocated to PSS. Homes will have flexibility on how funds are spent within the PSS envelope and no reporting on the physiotherapy fund o Fixed top-up of $106,000 per annum that can be used for any direct care staff, which was previously restricted to registered nurse (RN) positions
•
Changes effective August 1, 2019 o Funded CMI for the NPC envelope will be applied August 1, 2019 rather than April 1, 2019 o RAI-MDS funding will be converted to $1.43 per diem and allocated on a non-CMI basis to the NPC envelope, resulting in greater flexibility in the use of funds while maintaining the RAI-MDS coordinator positions o High Wage Transition Fund (HWTF) will end, which was implemented on April 1, 1996, as a three-year temporary transition measure
Resident Accommodation Rates: On May 28, 2019, the Ministry announced the annual increase in accommodation copayment rates. Effective July 1, 2019, an inflationary increase of 2.3% will be applied to the co-payment for basic and preferred accommodation in long-term care homes. The impact on funding, if any, of the annual increase in accommodation co-payment rates has not been included in this report. Comment CMI The CMI results of the assessment period April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018 are used to determine funding for fiscal 2019-20. The following are the highlights for fiscal 2019-20: •
Fairmount Home’s (“Fairmount”) home level CMI increased 1.3% (2016-17 – 1.0301; 2017-18 – 1.0438), which means that the acuity level of residents has increased when compared to the previous assessment period. Since the 2011-12 assessment period, Fairmount’s home level CMI has increased by 6.2%; whereas, the funded CMI has only increased by 2.6% during the same time period. This disparity is due to the re-indexing factor applied to the home level CMI in order to determine the funded CMI and thereby the ministry funding for the respective fiscal year
•
Re-indexing factor decreased by 1.4% (2018-19 – 0.9456; 2019-20 – 0.9320), which means that the ministry further discounted the actual home level CMI and ultimately, the funding needed to provide nursing and personal care for residents.
Information Report to Council Fairmount Home – MOHLTC Funding Announcements for 2019-20 June 19, 2019
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 422 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
Page 2 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Without the re-indexing factor, the NPC funding envelope would have been approximately $332,574 or 6.8% higher for fiscal 2019-20 •
Funded CMI decreased 0.1% when compared to the previous funding year. As a result of the funding announcements, the NPC funding envelope is $79,392 less than budgeted for calendar 2019 (or $108,076 annualized)
•
The following chart presents the CMI history for the past seven (7) years:
Sustainability Implications Fairmount’s business plan includes service level changes to move towards the minimum of four (4) hours of care per resident per day, which has been supported by the Council of the County of Frontenac (“Council”) for the past several years. Council’s commitment has resulted in an increase in municipal contributions for Fairmount’s operating budget. The municipal contributions budgeted for 2019 were approximately $3.5 million or 2.5% of Fairmount’s operating budget. When compared to other municipally operated longterm care homes, the municipal contributions for Fairmount are less than the average contributions per bed per day. Fairmount will continue its commitment to quality improvement, which includes finding efficiencies. However, with the increasing acuity levels of residents and our commitment to providing quality, resident-centered care, it is important for Council to continue with its commitment to Fairmount and our residents, staff and volunteers. Financial Implications Based on the funding announcements effective April 1, 2019 and August 1, 2019, the following are the financial implications for Fairmount:
Information Report to Council Fairmount Home – MOHLTC Funding Announcements for 2019-20 June 19, 2019
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 423 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
Page 3 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Funding Impact 2019 Annualized
Funding envelope Global increase
62,304
82,694
NPC
(82,408)
(115,271)
PSS
(10,169)
(13,498)
RF
(4,475)
(8,877)
OA
(21,197)
(42,048)
High wage transition fund
(28,481)
(67,944)
(84,425) $
(164,943)
Total
$
Funding impact as a percent of 2019 operating budget
-0.6%
-1.2%
Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected County of Frontenac – Finance Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Information Report to Council Fairmount Home – MOHLTC Funding Announcements for 2019-20 June 19, 2019
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 424 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
Page 4 of 4
AGENDA ITEM #a)
CASE MIX INDEX (CMI) RESULTS FOR 2019-20 This note provides an overview of the CMI methodology and funding results for the 2019-20 Funding Year. These results will be applied effective August 1, 2019. CMI METHODOLOGY The following modelling approach will continue to apply in determining CMI results: •
Home Level CMI or the reported CMI is calculated from your MDS 2.0 assessments completed between April 2017 – March 2018.
•
Special Rehabilitation (SR) Limited CMI is derived by applying a 5% level limit on SR RUG group - This means that maximum of 5% of a home’s assessed days will be assigned to the SR group in the calculation of the Funded CMI; assessed days more than 5% threshold are assigned to the next highest qualifying non-SR RUG group.
•
Funded CMI, which is used to calculate NPC funding, is determined by applying a stability floor and a re-indexing factor to the SR Limited CMI. o
A 5% stability floor is in place to ensure that no home will experience a decline of more than 5% in the Funded CMI from the previous year.
o
A re-indexing factor is applied for all homes to maintain the provincial average funded CMI.
NPC FUNDING To acknowledge the delay in releasing the CMI results, the FY2019-20 funding allocation is based on: •
Using 2018-19 funded CMI for the period of April 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019 (122 days); and
•
Using 2019-20 funded CMI for the period of August 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020 (244 days).
RELEASE OF CMI RESULTS The LTC CMI funding results for all homes will be posted on the ministry website www.hsim.health.gov.on.ca/hdbportal/ and Ontario LTC Homes portal (www.ltchomes.net) which includes:
- The LTC CMI Master Report that provides CMI results for all LTC homes.
- The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) document provides information about the CMI methodology. Please contact our HSFR Helpline via email HSF@ontario.ca for any additional information.
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 425 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée
Assistant Deputy Minister Long-Term Care Homes Division
Sous-ministre adjointe Division des foyers de soins de longue durée
11th Floor, 1075 Bay Street Toronto ON M5S 2B1 Tel.: (416) 327-7461 Fax: (416) 327-7603
1075, rue Bay, 11e étage Toronto ON M5S 2B1 Téléphone: (416) 327-7461 Télécopieur: (416) 327-7603
May 30, 2019
iApprove: 2019- 00963
Mr. William Hatanaka Board Chair Ontario Health 1075 Bay Street, Suite 1002 Toronto, ON M5S 2B1 Dear Mr. William Hatanaka: Re:
Amendment to the Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement to increase Level-ofCare base funding for the Long-Term Care Home sector.
This letter is further to the recent letter from the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, in which she informed you that the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (“ministry”) will provide funding representing a 1.7 per cent increase to the sector in the 2019-20 funding year. Specifically, the letter provides up to $84,678,600 in 2019-20 for funding increases to preserve front-line staff and maintain current levels of service provided for resident care and accommodation. As you are aware, on April 11, 2019 the government tabled its 2019 Budget. This year’s budget reflects the outcomes of a comprehensive multi-year planning process that built on the findings of EY Canada’s line-by-line review, and the ideas identified in the Planning for Prosperity Survey and the Big Bold Ideas Challenge. The government conducted a thorough review of all government programs in order ensure investments are sustainable and modernized. The review is also meant to ensure that duplication is eliminated, and valuable programs and services are sustainable and delivering outcomes for the people of Ontario. In addition to this review, all ministries were required to identify administrative savings. This was to be done by identifying opportunities to modernize services to reduce administrative costs and burden, while improving services across ministries, agencies and transfer-payment partners. Ministries considered how they could eliminate duplicative and non-value-added processes and implement automation and other streamlining solutions where repetitive and routine tasks existed previously. As noted above, the ministry is investing 1.7% more in LTC this year, which includes investments in more specialised services, specifically high-acuity priority access beds and behavioural support units. Other changes to the long-term care funding system are captured below: …/2
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 426 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
-2A. Changes Effective April 1, 2019
- The level-of-care, or per diem, rate will increase by $1.77 per resident per day (prpd). Homes will have flexibility on which envelope(s) this increase should be applied to with the exception that no more than 32% of this increase can be allocated to the Other Accommodation envelope. The increase is non-CMI adjusted and will be shown on the funding summary sheet as a global adjustment. There will be no further adjustment in July 2019 for the Raw Food or Other Accommodation envelopes.
- The physiotherapy program funding will be converted to a per diem ($2.27 prpd) and allocated to the Program and Support Services (PSS) envelope. Homes will have full flexibility in how this funding can be spent within the existing PSS envelope eligibility guidelines. With the aggregation of the physiotherapy fund into the PSS envelope the ministry is also no longer requiring any reporting on the physiotherapy fund.
- Small homes (those with 64 beds or less) will receive a fixed top-up of $180,000/annum that can be used for any direct care staff. This fixed amount is the combination of the RN and RPN funding as well as a further top-up of $4529. As such no requirements to use this funding on RN and RPNs exist but the ministry encourages homes to continue to staff according to their resident needs.
- All other homes (those with more than 64 beds) will receive a fixed top-up of $106,000/annum that can be used for any direct care staff. This top-up replaces the RN funding that was introduced in FY 18-19 and requirements to use this funding to hire a RN by July 1, 2020 are now lifted. The ministry encourages homes to continue to staff according to their resident needs. With these changes the per diem effective April 1, 2019 is $180.80 prpd. In addition, operators that provide convalescent care beds will have more flexibility in how funding can be used as the ministry is embedding the historical, additional physiotherapy subsidy of $11.34 prpd into the PSS envelope. Further the ministry is also applying a 1% increase to the funding envelopes. B. Changes Effective August 1, 2019
- The CMI will be effective from August 1, 2019-March 31, 2020. Only the pre-April 1, 2019 Nursing and Personal Care (NPC) envelope (excluding the supplemental amount) will be CMI adjusted as the increase for this year as noted in section A above can be applied to any envelope.
- The RAI-MDS funding will be converted to a per diem ($1.43) and allocated on a nonCMI basis to the NPC envelope. As such, the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set 2.0 Funding Policy has been embedded into the NPC envelope as a supplementary per diem, resulting in greater flexibility in the use of the funds while maintaining a RAI-MDS Coordinator(s) position.
- The High Wage Transition Fund (HWTF) will end. HWTF was introduced on April 1, 1996, as a three-year temporary transition measure. The objective was to assist operators to maintain equitable service levels while higher than average wage costs were addressed, as the ministry moved to a “needs based” funding approach. HWTF has now exceeded its intended purpose as the transition to the Level of Care funding model has since standardized funding approaches across all Long-Term Care homes.
…/3
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 427 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
-34. The Structural Compliance Program (SCP) will end. Since April 1, 1998, the ministry has paid a Structural Compliance Premium (SCP) to long-term care home operators who were not eligible at the time to receive other financial assistance from the ministry to upgrade their homes. The intention was to support eligible operators with complying with relevant design standards until such time that they were eligible for other ministry support for development and upgrading projects, namely the Construction Funding Subsidy (CFS) program. As there is now improved financial support (including the adjustments of the base CFS to $18.03 prpd) with which operators can build new and/or upgrade existing long-term care homes, the ministry will be harmonizing the eligibility for SCP payments with the 20-year terms for CFS payments that were provided to eligible operators in 1998. The SCP funding for eligible operators under the Structural Compliance Premiums for Self-Funded Renewal Projects, 2009 will not be discontinued at this time. Both the HWTF and the SCP were slated to be wound down effective July 1, but in light of the on-going conversations with sector stakeholders implementation has been delayed by a month to further support LTC home operators. With these changes the per diem effective August 1, 2019 is $182.23 prpd. C. Policy Changes and Consolidations Effective January 1, 2019, the LTCH Occupancy Targets Policy has been changed and consolidated into a new policy called the Long-Term Care Homes Level-of-Care Per Diem, Occupancy and Acuity-Adjustment Funding Policy. One specific change is to remove occupancy targets for small homes for the care and food envelopes. This will assist a cohort of homes that have traditionally returned funds to maximize use of provided funding. Other changes related to reducing administrative burden in applying for credits for lost days due to outbreaks and other occupancy target protections are detailed in the policy, which will be available on the portal. This letter confirms our amendment to the accountability agreement between the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care and the Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) (Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement) for the changes in funding and policy referenced in the revised LongTerm Care Homes Level-of-Care Per Diem, Occupancy and Acuity-Adjustment Funding Policy. The LTC home Level-of-Care Per Diem Funding Summary and Long-Term Care Homes Levelof-Care Per Diem, Occupancy and Acuity-Adjustment Funding Policy have been revised to reflect the April 1, 2019 and August 1, 2019 per diem changes. The revised policy will be posted on the ministry’s public website at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/ltc/lsaa_policies.aspx. Please provide notice of the amended policies and revised summaries to your LTC home service providers. Your monthly payment notices will be adjusted to reflect the new per diem rates, including applicable retroactive payments for the increases made effective April 1, 2019. As outlined in the 2019 Budget, the government is committed to embedding a focus on optimizing the value of our investments into future multi-year planning processes and into the culture of the Ontario Public Service more broadly. To that end, the government will undertake program evaluations on a permanent and ongoing basis to ensure government services are meeting people’s needs and to identify ways to modernize programs and save money. …/4
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 428 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
-4The government will continue to engage with long-term care stakeholders to make the system more efficient and has already addressed issues that the sector raised such as the costs of Bill 148 and the rising costs of WSIB premiums. In fact, beginning in January 2019 eligible employers saw a significant decrease in premiums. The recommendations that you have provided thus far to reduce red tape in both the operating and the capital expansion (development) areas are appreciated and under review and as identified above we are making tangible changes to reporting burden. The changes communicated via this letter do not affect the LHIN’s obligation to fund all of the increases described above for all LHIN-Requested Long-Term Care (LTC) home beds in accordance with Schedule 3 of the Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement. The ministry and the LHIN confirm that all provisions of the Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement remain in full force and effect. The LHIN is required to maintain financial records for this allocation. Unspent funds, and funds not used for the intended and approved purposes, are subject to recovery in accordance with the ministry’s reconciliation and recovery policy. In consideration of the foregoing, the Ministry-LHIN Accountability Agreement is amended as set out in this letter, unless you advise me within 60 days that the LHIN does not agree to receive the additional funding on the terms and conditions described above. We appreciate your cooperation with the ministry in managing transfer payment (TP) funding provided through you to your transfer payment recipients as effectively as possible. Your TP recipients are expected to adhere to reporting requirements, particularly for in-year service and financial reporting, which is expected to be timely and accurate. Based on monitoring and assessment of your TP recipients’ in-year service and financial reporting, you should consider whether your TP recipients’ cash flow should be adjusted to match the actual services being provided. Should you require any further information or clarification regarding the 1.7% overall funding increase in 2019-20, please contact Nita Singh, Senior Financial Policy Advisor at 416-3277105 or by email at Nita.Singh@ontario.ca. Thank you for your continued commitment to delivering better quality long-term care.
Brian Pollard Assistant Deputy Minister c: Chief Executive Officers, Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) Mr. Jim Yuill, Director, Financial Management Branch Mr. Michael Robertson, Director, Programs and Funding Branch Ms. Michelle-Ann Hylton, Director, Policy and Development Branch
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 429 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée
Assistant Deputy Minister Long-Term Care Homes Division
Sous-ministre adjointe Division des foyers de soins de longue duree
11th Floor, 1075 Bay Street Toronto ON M5S 2B1 Tel.: (416) 327-7461 Fax: (416) 327-7603
1075, rue Bay, 11e étage Toronto ON M5S 2B1 Téléphone: (416) 327-7461 Télécopieur: (416) 327-7603
HLTC6225IT-2018-87C
May 28, 2019
MEMORANDUM TO:
Long-Term Care Home Licensees
FROM:
Brian Pollard Assistant Deputy Minister Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
RE:
LTC Home Accommodation Rate Changes Effective July 1, 2019
This memo is to inform you about the annual increase in accommodation co-payment rates. Effective July 1, 2019, an inflationary increase of 2.3% will be applied to the co-payment for basic and preferred accommodation in Long-Term Care (LTC) Homes. The basic co-payment rate will increase from $60.78 per day to $62.18 per day (or $1,891.31 per month). This represents an increase of $1.40 per day. Residents who choose semi-private or private accommodation are charged an additional premium above the daily basic co-payment rate. The respective premiums for semi-private and private accommodation will also increase by 2.3% effective July 1, 2019. Please refer to the enclosed bulletin for the applicable preferred accommodation rates for your home. This inflationary increase is consistent with the evergreen co-payment policy implemented to enable predictable, consistent and transparent annual increases. It is based on the rate of prior year inflation as measured by the Canadian Consumer Price Index (CPI). Although this increase applies to all LTC home beds, those residents who apply for and receive a rate reduction should not be affected because their co-payment amount is determined based on what they can afford. Please note, as you are required by regulation to provide a minimum of 30 days written notice of the co-payment rate increase to residents, a bulletin advising residents of the rate change has been enclosed with this memo. Please ensure that the attached bulletin is provided immediately to all residents and is placed in areas accessible to residents before May 31, 2019.
…/2
14-075
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 430 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
-2Should you have any questions, please contact the LTC Action Line, at 1-866-434-0144. Thank you for your efforts and commitment to improving the quality of care provided to LTC residents. Sincerely,
Brian Pollard Assistant Deputy Minister
c:
Chief Executive Officers, Local Health Integration Networks Ms. Lisa Levin, Chief Executive Officer, AdvantAge Ontario Ms. Donna Duncan, Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Long Term Care Association Mr. Michael Robertson, Director, Programs and Funding Branch, MOHLTC Ms. Michelle-Ann Hylton, Director, Policy, Development and Licensing Branch, MOHLTC Ms. Stacey Colameco, Director, Long-Term Care Inspections Branch, MOHLTC Mr. Jim Yuill, Director, Financial Management Branch, MOHLTC Ms. Teresa Buchanan, Director, Fiscal Oversight & Performance Branch, MOHLTC Mr. Phil Graham, Director, Local Health Integration Network Liaison Branch, MOHLTC Dr. Melanie Kohn, Director, Hospitals Branch, MOHLTC
14-075
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 431 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
APPENDIX I CHANGES IN ACCOMODATION RATES The following table provides the new rates that will apply as of July 1, 2019. New Daily Rate
New Monthly Rate
$62.18
$1,891.31
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2015.
$74.96
$2,280.04
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after September 1, 2014, but prior to July 1, 2015.
$73.89
$2,247.49
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2013, but prior to September 1, 2014.
$72.83
$2,215.25
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2012, but prior to July 1, 2013.
$71.75
$2,182.40
Residents occupying older beds, or residents admitted to newer beds prior to July 1, 2012.
$70.70
$2,150.46
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2015.
$88.82
$2,701.61
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after September 1, 2014, but prior to July 1, 2015.
$86.96
$2,645.04
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2013, but prior to September 1, 2014.
$85.08
$2,587.85
Residents admitted to newer beds on or after July 1, 2012, but prior to July 1, 2013.
$83.22
$2,531.28
Residents occupying older beds, or residents admitted to newer beds prior to July 1, 2012.
$81.35
$2,474.40
$40.24
N/A
Type of Accommodation Long-Stay Resident: Basic Semi-Private
Private
Short-Stay Resident (Respite Bed) NOTE:
“Newer beds” – beds classified as “NEW” or “A” according to ministry design standards “Older beds” – beds classified as “B”, “C”, “Upgraded D” or “D” according to ministry design standards
14-075
of 437 2019-067 FairmountPage Home 432 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding An…
AGENDA ITEM #a)
By-Law No. 2019-0024 of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac Being a By-Law to adopt a Strategic Asset Management Policy Whereas a comprehensive and holistic asset management approach will support efficient and effective delivery of expected levels of service and ensure these practices are applied to the long-term management and stewardship of all municipal infrastructure assets; And Whereas the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015 and Ontario Regulation 588/17 require municipalities to adopt a Strategic Asset Management Policy; And Whereas the approval of this policy is an important step towards integrating the County’s strategic mission with its asset management program, and ensuring that critical municipal infrastructure assets and vital services are maintained and provided to the community in a reliable, sustainable manner; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac authorizes the following:
- That the Council of the County of Frontenac herby adopts a Strategic Asset Management Policy attached to this by-law as Appendix A;
- That this By-law shall come into force and take effect upon the date of final passing. Read a First and Second Time this 19th day of June, 2019. Read a Third Time, Signed, Sealed and Finally Passed this 19th day of June, 2019.
The Corporation of the County Of Frontenac
Ron Higgins, Warden
Jannette Amini, Clerk
433 of 437 Policy [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0… To Adopt a Strategic Page Asset Management
AGENDA ITEM #b)
By-Law No. 2019-0025 of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac Being a By-Law to Adopt a Frontenac County Strategic Plan 2019-2022 Whereas the Council of the County of Frontenac wishes to set goals and priorities for the County of Frontenac during its term of Council; And Whereas the County of Frontenac carried out extensive public consultation to determine and develop its goals and priorities for 2019-2022; And Whereas the Council of the County of Frontenac deems it expedient to adopt a County of Frontenac Strategic Plan 2019-2022; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac authorizes the following:
- That Council herby adopts the County of Frontenac Strategic Plan 2019-2020 attached hereto as Schedule “A” to this by-law;
- That this By-law shall come into force and take effect upon the date of final passing. Read a First and Second Time this 19th day of June, 2019 Read a Third Time, Signed, Sealed and Finally Passed this 19th day of June, 2019.
The Corporation of the County Of Frontenac
Ron Higgins, Warden
Jannette Amini, Clerk
434 of 437Plan 2019-2022 [Proposed By-law No… To Adopt a FrontenacPage County Strategic
AGENDA ITEM #b)
435 of 437Plan 2019-2022 [Proposed By-law No… To Adopt a FrontenacPage County Strategic
AGENDA ITEM #c)
By-Law No. 2019-0026 of The Corporation of the County OF Frontenac being a by-law to confirm all actions and proceedings of County Council on June 19, 2019
Whereas Section 8 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under the Municipal Act or any other Act; and; Whereas Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto provides that a lower-tier municipality and an upper-tier municipality may pass by-laws respecting matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in the Table to Subsection 2 subject to certain provisions, and; Whereas Section 5 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipal power, including a municipality’s capacity, rights, powers and privileges under Section 8 shall be exercised by its council and by by-law unless the municipality is specifically authorized to do otherwise; and; Whereas the Council of the County of Frontenac deems it expedient to confirm its actions and proceedings; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac hereby enacts as follows:
- That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on June 19, 2019 be confirmed as actions for which the municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person.
- That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on June 19, 2019 be confirmed as being matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto.
- That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on June 19, 2019 except those taken by by-law and those required by by-law to be done by resolution are hereby sanctioned, ratified and confirmed as though set out within and forming part of this by-law.
Page 436 of 437of County Council on June 19, 201… To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings
AGENDA ITEM #c)
- That this by-law shall come into force and take effect as of the final passing thereof. Read a First and Second Time this 19th day of June 2019. Read a Third Time and Finally Passed, Signed and Sealed this 19th day of June, 2019.
The Corporation of the County Of Frontenac
Ron Higgins, Warden
Jannette Amini, Clerk
By-Law No. 2019-0026 – To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings of County Council June 19, 2019
Page 437 of 437of County Council on June 19, 201… To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings
age 2 of 2
