Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: October 2, 2014 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Advisory Committees of Council/Trails Advisory Commitee/2014/Trails Advisory Committee - 02 Oct 2014 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
Date and Time
Thursday, October 2, 2014, 10:00 am.
Place
County of Frontenac Fairmount Home Boardroom 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie
Members: Denis Doyle, Warden Gary Davison, Deputy Warden Allan McPhail, CRCA Representatiive Dieter Eberhardt, User Representaive
Derrick Spafford, User Representaive Joan Hollywood, Adjacent Land Owner Marc Moeys, Adjacent Land Owner
Page
- Call to order
- Adoption of the agenda
- Disclosure of pecuniary interest and general nature thereof
- Deputations and/or presentations 3
•
Marcel Giroux, will address the Trails Advisory Committee on the motion that he requested, which was adopted by the Township of Central Frontenac to recognize an existing portion of the K&P Trail
- Adoption of minutes 4-7
•
Minutes of Meeting held August 26, 2014 THAT the minutes of the Trails Advisory Committee meeting held August 26, 2014 be adopted as circulated.
- Reports/Topics for Discussion 8-10
•
2014-147 Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update
11-148
•
For information only. Trails Concept Plan
149
•
Gate protocol for snowmobile club on the K&P Trail
- Communications
Page 1 of 149
Page 8. Other business 9. Next meeting date
•
The next meeting of the Trails Advisory Committee is scheduled for Thursday, December 4, 2014 at 10 a.m. at the County Administrative Building.
- Adjournment
Page 2 of 149
AgendaItem#4•
Marcel Giroux, will address the Trails Advisory Committee on the
Page 3 of 149
AgendaItem#5•
TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES August 26, 2014 A meeting of the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) was held in the Frontenac Boardroom of the County Administrative Office, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie on Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 10:00 AM In attendance: Allan McPhail, Chair Deputy Warden Denis Doyle, Vice-Chair Councillor Gary Davison Dieter Eberhardt Derrick Spafford Joan Hollywood Regrets: Marc Moeys Staff: Anne Marie Young, Manager of Economic Development Kayla Blakely, Recording Secretary Guest: Chris Hammer 1.
Call to order
The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. 2.
Adoption of the agenda
Moved By: Seconded By:
Deputy Warden Doyle Councillor Davison
THAT the agenda for the August 26, 2014 Trails Advisory Committee be approved.
Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes August 26, 2014
Minutes of Meeting held August 26, 2014
Page 1 of 4
Page 4 of 149
AgendaItem#5•
CARRIED
Disclosure of pecuniary interest and general nature thereof
No members of the Committee declared any disclosures of pecuniary interest. 4.
Deputations and/or presentations MMM Group will provide the Trails Advisory Committee with a presentation on the process of the development of the Trails Concept Plan.
Mr. Jonathan Loschmann from the MMM Group presented the County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan. He discussed the feedback received from the May 26, 2014 Public Meeting held in Verona at the Verona Lions Hall and how the public’s input helped shape objectives of the Plan. Mr. Loschmann outlined each of the identified potential routes in the County. Councillor Doyle expressed frustration and questioned that it seemed that Frontenac Islands and North Frontenac were being excluded from the Plan. The Chair pointed out that the Plan is a base that can be added to in the future after further public consultation. Councillor Davison questioned the moneys awarded to North Frontenac for not having trail work done in the Township, yet the Plan presents proposed trail linkages in the Township of North Frontenac. Ms. Young noted the concern. She informed the committee that she has consulted with the different Townships to ensure the work they are doing at the Township level is connected and supported by the Trails Concept Plan. Mr. Loschmann handed the discussion period back to the Chair. During the discussion period, it was noted that the prices provided in the Plan are installed prices, therefore cost savings could be identified in some areas, such as labour expenses. Councillor Davison mentioned the 5 and 10 year Road Plan for South Frontenac includes shoulders along all major roads, which could be used to accommodate the creation of on-road trails. The Chair suggested to advise Council of the Plan and to bring a recommendation forward that would ask for more inclusion for the Frontenac Islands and North Frontenac by seeking further information. He also suggested that the Plan then been presented to each Township Council in order to have a Plan in place that is supported by all. Moved By: Seconded By:
Deputy Warden Doyle Mr. Eberhardt
THAT the County provide the required resources to proceed with further consultation in North Frontenac and the Frontenac Islands in regard to the Trails Concept Plan.
Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes August 26, 2014
Minutes of Meeting held August 26, 2014
Page 2 of 4
Page 5 of 149
AgendaItem#5•
CARRIED 5.
Adoption of minutes
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Davison Mr. Eberhardt
THAT the minutes of the Trails Advisory Committee meeting held April 3, 2014 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 6. Reports/Topics for Discussion 2014-129 Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update The segment of new development of the K&P Trail has been completely brushed and the bridge in undergoing inspection. South Frontenac Public Works is involved with the on the ground oversight of the trail work. Mr. Eberhardt questioned to cost of putting in a new bridge rather than a large culvert over White Creek. Ms. Young noted the abutments that already existed were in good shape, and Councillor Davison justified the unfeasibility of a culvert due to the permits required and the difficulties with installing culverts. The Committee identified the need to begin discussion with Canadian Pacific (CP) Rail and Bell concerning land agreements/acquisition in regards to developing the trail. The Chair suggested that the Committee remain in contact with the MPP for Kingston and the Islands for support and funding opportunities.
Communications
There were none. 8.
Other business
On September 13, 2014, the Lennox and Addington Ridge Runners Snowmobile Club is going to be placing signs along the K&P Trail. Mr. Eberhardt will provide photographs and the geographic coordinates of the signs being erected on the trail. He also questioned if ATVs should be allowed on the Trail in the winter season when there are snowmobiles using it since the ATVs could ruin the groomed trail. Guest Mr. Hammer informed the Committee that the media will be present for the signage installation on September 13, 2014, to recognize the County and the Snowmobile Club for the work they are doing to prepare the Trail for the winter season. 9.
Next meeting date
Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes August 26, 2014
Minutes of Meeting held August 26, 2014
Page 3 of 4
Page 6 of 149
AgendaItem#5•
The next meeting of the Trails Advisory Committee is scheduled for Thursday, October 2, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. at the County Administrative Building. 10.
Adjournment
Moved By: Seconded By:
Councillor Davison Mr. Eberhardt
THAT the meeting hereby adjourn at 11:19. CARRIED
Trails Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes August 26, 2014
Minutes of Meeting held August 26, 2014
Page 4 of 4
Page 7 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Report 2014-147 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT To:
Chair and Members of the Trails Advisory Committee
From:
Anne Marie Young Manager of Economic Development
Date prepared:
September 25, 2014
Date of meeting:
October 2, 2014
Re:
Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update
Committee Recommendation THAT the Trails Advisory Committee receive this 2014 Work Plan Update report for information.
Background At the October 16, 2013 regular meeting of County Council, Council approved the Trails Advisory Committee Work Plan for 2014. Goal/Vision The vision of the County of Frontenac stated in Directions for Our Future is Fresh with Opportunity Growing Vibrant, Innovative, Natural, Sustainable Places. Within the context, the Vision shared in the Frontenac Trails Master Plan can be read: Trails in the County of Frontenac promote sustainable and healthy communities by encouraging residents and visitors to get active while appreciating the natural beauty and rich heritage of Frontenac County.
Mandate
To provide input and suggestions regarding the execution of Implementation Plan for the Frontenac K&P Trail.
Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update October 2, 2014
2014-147 Trails Advisory Committee – 2014
Page 1 of 3
Page 8 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
To provide input and suggestions regarding other trails initiatives throughout the County including the Townships of North, Central, South Frontenac and Frontenac Islands.
To report periodically to County Council on progress on the committee’s work.
Comment Amendments to the Procedural By-law regarding Term of Citizen Appointments The County of Frontenac Procedural By-law establishes the Terms of Reference for all Committees of County Council – including member’s terms of appointment – and states that members shall hold office from the date of their appointment up to the end of the term of Council, that being November 30th of a Municipal Election Year. Given that the new Council will not officially take office until the inaugural meeting of County Council, scheduled for December 17, 2014, appointments to Committees would not happen until late January or February, 2015. As such, County Council, at its July 16th meeting, approved an amendment to the Procedural By-law that dictates that Citizen Committee members continue to serve on a committee past the expiration of their term, until they are replaced. Council membership on Committees will end on November 30 of a municipal election year. Committee vacancies will be advertised beginning in September, 2014 to ensure a sufficient window for those interested to inquire and submit applications. Work Plan activities realized to date:
Provide input and suggestions to recognize and realize actions relative to the County of Frontenac Trails Master Plan. In August, a funding opportunity became available through the National Coalition Council of Canada. County Council approved a request to lever $360,000 of the County’s Federal Gas Tax reserve for a funding application to build a bridge at Elbow Creek and an additional 7 km of trail development on the Frontenac K&P. The application was completed in partnership with the Eastern Ontario Trails Alliance and filed by the August 15, 2014 deadline. Successful applicants are to be notified by the first of October. An agreement will need to be drafted between the County and the Eastern Ontario Trails Alliance (EOTA).
Target to fully open the K&P section from South Frontenac Rd 38 near Craig Road to White Lake Road in 2014. Crains’ Construction Limited was contracted for the reconstruction of the bridge at White Creek. The bridge is completed. Crains’ Construction Limited was contracted for the development of the K&P from north of Verona and east of SF Rd 38 to west of CF Rd 38 across from the White Lake Road access. Public Works staff from South Frontenac oversaw the construction. The build was completed on time and within budget. Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update October 2, 2014
2014-147 Trails Advisory Committee – 2014
Page 2 of 3
Page 9 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
- Work with adjacent landowners and private property owners (in the areas of discontinuity) to establish the trail route in preparation for phasing as outlined the 2013 Frontenac K&P Implementation Plan – Phase 2. This activity is slated for winter of 2015.
- Communicate with other trail organizations and invite them to committee meetings to share best practices and possible partnerships. The L&A Ridgerunner Snowmobile Club has installed stop signs and others on the trail running north starting at Harrowsmith. This is done as part of the partnership agreement with the County. Another opportunity for funding became available in September to apply to the Community Futures Development Corporation for the same project stated in #1. Partnership with EOTA was critical to its success. News of the funding should be known by this TAC meeting.
- Ensure that the committee’s time is allocated evenly between the implementation of the Frontenac K&P and other initiatives that facilitate the development and/or marketing of other trail systems as identified in the 2014 Trails Concept Plan for the County of Frontenac. Further meetings will be held this fall in Frontenac Islands and North Frontenac to gain further information for possible trail scenarios for inclusion in the draft Trails Concept Plan for Frontenac. A draft of the plan to date is filed with this report. Financial Implication Provision for trail related expenses have been included in the 2014 budget.
Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Township of North Frontenac Township of Central Frontenac Township of South Frontenac Township of Frontenac Islands Trans Canada Trail Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Quinte Region Conservation Authority Eastern Ontario Trails Alliance Adjacent landowners to the K&P Trail
Trails Advisory Committee – 2014 Work Plan Update October 2, 2014
2014-147 Trails Advisory Committee – 2014
Page 3 of 3
Page 10 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Trails Concept Plan
D16-13-085
September 2014
Trails Concept Plan
Page 11 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Table of Contents County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.0 Introduction and Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 2.0 Existing Context …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 2.1 Background Documents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.1.1 County of Frontenac Trails Master Plan ……………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.1.2 County of Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan ……………………………………………………………… 5 2.2 Existing Trail Network …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 2.2.1 Trail Initiatives within Frontenac County……………………………………………………………………………….. 6 2.2.2 Trail Initiatives in Surrounding Counties ……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 2.2.3 Ontario Federation of Snowmobile Clubs (OFSC) …………………………………………………………………. 7 3.0 Consultation Strategy …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 3.1 Public Open House ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 3.2 Summary of Stakeholder Input ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 4.0 Development of the Network ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 4.1 Trail Types ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.2 Benefits of Trails ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 4.3 Trails Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 4.3.1 Universal Trail Design ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 4.3.2 Wheelchair and Electric Scooter Users ………………………………………………………………………………. 16 4.3.3 Personal Security and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) ………………….. 18 4.3.4 Trail Maintenance and Operations …………………………………………………………………………………….. 19 4.3.5 Winter Maintenance of Off-Road Trails ………………………………………………………………………………. 21 4.3.6 Trail Maintenance Planning ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 4.3.7 Trip End Facilities and Staging Areas ………………………………………………………………………………… 26 4.4 Trail Opportunities ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 4.4.1 Completing and Providing Connection to the “Spine” of Network Trails ………………………………….. 28 4.4.2 Connecting Towns and Villages to Natural Areas ………………………………………………………………… 28 4.4.3 Connecting to Natural Areas …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 4.4.4 Connecting to Towns and Villages …………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 4.5 Proposed Trail Concept Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 29 4.6 Prioritization / Ranking Tool …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 4.6.1 Using the Tool ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 4.6.2 Applying the Route Selection Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………. 32 5.0 Implementation and Phasing Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………. 33 5.1 Funding Opportunities …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 33 5.2 Unit Costs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 35 5.3 Opinion of Probable Cost for Proposed Routes …………………………………………………………………… 35 6.0 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 38
Trails Concept Plan
Page 12 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Figures Figure 1: Public Information Centre May 2014 Figure 2: Staging Area Hierarchy Figure 3: Suitability Index
Tables Table 1: Off-Road Trail Type - Primary Multi-Use Trail Table 2: Off-Road Trail Type - Secondary Multi-Use Trail Table 3: On-Road Trail Type - Signed Route Table 4: On-Road Trail Type - Paved Shoulder Table 5: Off-Road Trail Type - Hiking / Foot Trail Table 6: Active and Sustainable Transportation Benefits Table 7: Trail Maintenance Planning Table 8: Network Amenities in Staging Areas Hierarchy Table 9: Proposed Routes Suitability Score Table 11: Funding Opportunities for Trail/Cycling Infrastructure Table 12: Proposed Routes – Opinion of Probable Cost
ii ii
Trails Concept Plan
Page 13 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Maps Map 1: Existing Conditions - County of Frontenac Map 2: Existing Conditions - Township of North Frontenac Map 3: Existing Conditions - Township of Central Frontenac Map 4: Existing Conditions - Township of South Frontenac Map 5: Existing Conditions - Township of Frontenac Islands Map 6: Existing Hiking Trails Map 7: Existing Snowmobile Trails Map 8: Proposed Routes by Trail Opportunities Map 9: Proposed Routes by Facility Type - County of Frontenac Map 10: Proposed Routes by Facility Type - Township of North Frontenac Map 11: Proposed Routes by Facility Type - Township of Central Frontenac Map 12: Proposed Routes by Facility Type - Township of South Frontenac Map 13: Proposed Routes by Facility Type - Township of Frontenac Islands
Appendix A - Summary of Stakeholder Input B - Route Evaluation Worksheets C - Sample Unit Costs D – January 2014 Presentation to the Trails Advisory Committee E – August 2014 Presentation to Trails Advisory Committee
Related Documents County of Frontenac – Trails Master Plan (2009) County of Frontenac – K&P Trail Implementation (2009)
Trails Concept Plan
Page 14 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan
1.0 Introduction and Executive Summary The County of Frontenac is committed to developing and implementing County-wide trails. This Trails Concept Plan sets out a short-term and long-term strategy to create a supportive pedestrian, cycling, and all-season environment that will encourage recreational and utilitarian travel by walking, cycling, and select motorized use that promotes the importance of active lifestyles for residents and tourists. A system of integrated and connected on-road and off-road facilities can help define a county as a great place to live, work, and play – and that supports improvement to community health, safety, economy, transportation and tourism. In order to facilitate the further development and implementation of the Trails Concept Plan. Potential funding opportunities are highlighted with unit prices for the various facilities types. An estimated $9.2M in capital improvements are identified; $3.6M in off-road facilities and $5.6M in on-road facilities. It is increasingly important that well-planned and well-designed trails and trail connections form part of a County and local municipal transportation strategy. This plan will assist the County and local municipalities in planning for, implementing, prioritizing, and financing trail related infrastructure improvements. The ongoing commitment of the County to the development of the K+P Trail as a major component of the County’s off-road trail network is a key initiative and contributor to the core intent of this plan and its benefits. This plan is important to County-wide and local strategic interests - to foster healthy and sustainable communities that benefit residents, local economy, and the environment. An equally important attribute of this plan is the promotion of on-road and off-road trails for all seasons and all segments of the County – North, Central, South, and the Islands. Education and promotion of active and recreational transportation opportunities includes encouragement initiatives to raise awareness of the numerous benefits of trails to bring about a ‘cultural shift’ in the way residents and visitors navigate the County of Frontenac.
4 4
Trails Concept Plan
Page 15 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
2.0 Existing Context 2.1 Background Documents The 2009 County of Frontenac Trails Master Plan and the 2009 County of Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan are two (2) key background documents which establish the importance of a trail system and the appropriate steps to take through to implementation. These documents are used as a foundation to the Trails Concept Plan, summarized below.
2.1.1 County of Frontenac Trails Master Plan The Frontenac Trails Master Plan summarizes the history and landscape of the County of Frontenac as well as the health, economic and environmental benefits associated with recreational trails. It provides context to the pursuit of trail development by highlighting similar trends at the municipal, provincial and national levels and by discussing the relationships between trails and the tenets of sustainability. It offers a resource inventory of existing trails in the County as well as trail organizations and stakeholder groups. It sets out recommendations for the management structure, policies of trail providers, and general guidelines for trail design and signage. Phasing strategies for trail development are laid out and maintenance guidelines established. Funding and promotional opportunities are offered with implementation strategies.
2.1.2 County of Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan The Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan prioritizes projects into a phasing schedule - to identify capital costs associated with each phase, and to identify annual operating and maintenance costs of each respective plan. The trail is open for use upon completion of each phase once compliance to safety issues is satisfied. The phasing place outlines a systematic and organized fashion as financial resources are available.
This plan aims to supplement the successful work completed to date and to guide future trail development initiatives for both on-road and off-road facilities county-wide.
5
Trails Concept Plan
Page 16 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
2.2 Existing Trail Network Before proposing new routes or connections to the network, an inventory of the existing network needs to be completed. This was a crucial first step of this plan in order to understand what types of facilities currently exist in the County, objectively and regardless of municipal or county jurisdiction.
County staff provided the study team with all available GIS information, including:
Existing Road Network;
Property Parcel information;
Water bodies, Streams and Wetlands;
Provincial Parks;
Major Attractions;
Hamlets; and
Existing Trail information
Using this available digital information, and by combining it with other available maps and information, the study team developed a ‘signal set’ of existing network maps. A total of seven existing maps are included herein. Refer to ‘Map’ appendices. Map 1 highlights the entire county, Maps 2 - 5 highlight one of each of the four (4) townships (North, Central, South, the Islands). Map 6 shows the existing hiking trails and Map 7 shows the existing Snowmobile Trails in the County of Frontenac.
2.2.1 Trail Initiatives within Frontenac County The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) was established in 2011 to oversee the implementation of the Frontenac K&P Trails as well as to provide input and suggestions regarding other trail initiatives through the county. The leadership of this committee is recognized as critical to the on-going establishment and development of this plan and to an effective county-wide network of trails. Phase 1 of the K&P Trail, running from the City of Kingston/County of Frontenac boundary at Orser Road to Boyce Road in Hartington, was officially opened in August of 2012. Phase 2 saw the trail extended from Hartington to the Highway 38 just north of Verona. The majority of the work was completed in the fall of 2013. Phase 2 was recently opened to the public in the summer of 2014 as was the award of the tender for Phase 3 (from Highway 38 north of Verona to Godfrey).
6 6
Trails Concept Plan
Page 17 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
2.2.2 Trail Initiatives in Surrounding Counties Understanding what the surrounding counties have in terms of existing trail network and initiatives is of key interest to the County of Frontenac. Trail connections can be made to these surrounding networks which serve to improve the connectivity of both networks and can have an impact on tourism in both counties. The study team has researched the surrounding communities in order to gain insight into their trail network and any initiative which would be beneficial to the County of Frontenac.
County of Lennox and Addington The County of Lennox and Addington has a 600km trail network which consists of 12 looping routes. These paved roadway routes are designed so that you never have to retrace your path, yet are able to end where you began. The routes are found on well-maintained county and select local roadways. The trails vary in difficulty but all are well-marked, easily accessible, and promise to be exciting.
Lanark County In Lanark County there are plenty of towns, villages, hamlets, parks and conservation areas to explore. Perth, Smith Falls and Mississippi Mills are just a few of the towns who have significantly invested in an extensive trail network with routes that are suitable for all skill levels. These trails range from short 15km loops to ones which are over 100km in length.
Leeds and Grenville County Leeds Grenville has over 800km of well-maintained roads which offer some of the best scenery in Ontario. There are dozens of intricate off-road trails which are used by hikers, ATV enthusiasts, and cyclists alike.
2.2.3 Ontario Federation of Snowmobile Clubs (OFSC) The OFSC is a volunteer led not-for-profit association. Through strong leadership, the OFSC provides a wide range of quality programs and services to and on behalf of its membership organizations. The OFSC is represented in eastern Ontario by the District 1 Snowmobile Association. Member Clubs in the County of Frontenac include the K&P Snow Trails Association, Sharbot Lake Snowriders Club and Lennox and Addington (L&A) Ridgerunners Snowmobile Club. The local OFSC clubs are active users of the trail system in Frontenac County and have established numerous other trails throughout the County as was seen in Map 7. The local snowmobile clubs are also responsible for performing winter maintenance on trails which are used in the winter months.
7
Trails Concept Plan
Page 18 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
3.0 Consultation Strategy 3.1 Public Open House On May 26, 2014, a Public Open House was held at the Lion’s Club in Verona to display work to date and to receive critical input from the community. At this open house the consultants were present to provide an introduction to the project, make a formal presentation on the work completed to date and lead a workshop. Progress material was displayed on boards during the event and attendees were encouraged to provide their feedback on the boards. The event was attended by more than 25 people including representatives from the County of Frontenac and TAC. Figure 1: May 2014 Public Information Centre
3.2 Summary of Stakeholder Input Attendees at the Open House were knowledgeable and provided the project team with a number of valuable and insightful comments regarding the current state of trails in Frontenac County, on their experiences using the trails in Frontenac County, and what they envision for trails in Frontenac County in the future. Below a few comments and themes are highlighted. A complete summary of stakeholder input and copy of presentation materials can be found in Appendix A.
It was noted that the progress made developing the K&P Trail to date, but stressed that they wanted to make sure that the completion of the trail with the potential to Calabogie was seen as a priority - This “rails to trails” opportunity is a ‘once in a lifetime’ opportunity that the county should not pass up.
8 8
Trails Concept Plan
Page 19 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
There was a noted perceived need for more local and accessible starting points (trailheads) including space for snowmobile trailers and parking. It was noted that many snowmobilers are leaving the area to ride elsewhere due to the local access restrictions.
Some discussion was had about the definition of a trail. It was felt that there was the need for greater education of the various types of trails and the associated design standards.
It was generally noted that a plan needs to be developed to ensure that once the K&P is complete the next group of trail projects has been determined at that the progress and momentum realized through the development of the K&P Trail can be carried over to this next group of projects.
9
Trails Concept Plan
Page 20 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
4.0 Development of the Network 4.1 Trail Types There is a hierarchy of trail types for both on-road and off-road that should be considered when developing a trail network. Three potential off-road trial types have been identified in the Tables below. Two (2) potential on-road trail types are identified. Table 1: Off-Road Trail Type - Primary Multi-Use Trail Primary Multi-Use Trail Surface Type Hard surface (e.g. asphalt) or granular surface
Maintenance Requirements Highest level of maintenance may be considered for 4season maintenance, depending on location (e.g. primary school route)
Description & Connectivity
Location
Design Characteristics
►
►
►
Minimum 3.0m in width
►
Shall be designed to meet or exceed minimum accessibility requirements
►
Potential candidates for year-round maintenance
►
Typically designed to the highest standards to accommodate high volumes of use, destination oriented traffic, widest range of use abilities and important links to major community facilities
►
Supports pedestrian convenience and walkability and a range of active transportation opportunities
►
Lighting may be considered where use/demand is high
Key connectors in the urban areas, important transportation / commuter routes connecting schools and key community destinations and employment areas
►
Located within or outside of the road right-of-way in continuous linear corridors Linear utility corridors and offroad linear corridors outside of the road right-of-way can create ideal opportunities
►
To maintain route continuity, crossings of barriers such as major roadways, railways and waterways shall be considered in the early planning stages
►
In developed neighbourhoods it may be necessary to divert short segments of the Primary Multiuse Trail onto the road with other cycling facilities (i.e. a cycle-track or bike lane accompanied by a sidewalk)
10 10
Trails Concept Plan
Page 21 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Table 2: Off-Road Trail Type - Secondary Multi-Use Trail Secondary Multi-Use Trail Surface Type Typically granular / gravel surface, may be hard surfaced in locations where erosion is a concern
Maintenance Requirements 3-season maintenance
Description & Connectivity
Location
Design Characteristics
►
►
Located outside of the road right-of-way in continuous linear corridors
►
Minimum width of 2.0m to 2.4m (3.0 minimum if 2-way bicycle traffic is being considered)
►
Crossing of barriers such as roadways, railways and waterways considered in the early planning stages to identify locations where a minor realignment is necessary
►
Compacted granular surface (e.g. stonedust)
►
Potential candidates for year-round maintenance
►
These facilities are designed to meet minimum accessibility requirements where practical and feasible. Where this is not possible they are appropriately designed for a moderate to high volume of use and wide range of users
►
3-season use for pedestrian and cycling uses. Typically not a candidate for winter maintenance, and other uses during winter months are encouraged (e.g. cross country skiing)
►
Used to provide additional connections to local municipalities, neighbourhoods, parks, community facilities, natural areas, schools and conservation areas May be used as a transportation route during the spring, summer and fall seasons
►
On lower volume roads such as residential streets these connections can be made with sidewalks from pedestrians and shared space for cyclists (i.e. signed route or signed route with Sharrow markings on the roadway)
11
Trails Concept Plan
Page 22 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Table 3: On-Road Trail Type - Signed Route Signed Route Surface Type Hard surface (e.g. asphalt)
Maintenance Requirements Highest level of maintenance (4-season maintenance)
Description & Connectivity
Location
Design Characteristics
►
►
►
Wide Shared Roadway / Signed Bicycle Route - 4.0m to 4.5m , Narrow Shared Roadway / Signed Bicycle Route - 3.0m to 4.0m
►
Prior to initiating design work on a given link, practitioners should refer to the Bicycle Facility Type Selection process found in Ontario Traffic Manual Book 18. This will confirm whether the signed bicycle route is the most suitable facility type and identify key design considerations
Signed Routes are typically implemented on low volume road. Generally there are no other provisions needed beyond signing. On wide signed routes, cyclists are expected to ride on the right of the shared travel lane in accordance with the Highway Traffic Act
Often located on low volume local roads
12 12
Trails Concept Plan
Page 23 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Table 4: On-Road Trail Type - Paved Shoulder Paved Shoulder Surface Type Hard surface (e.g. asphalt)
Maintenance Requirements 3-season maintenance, may be considered for 4-season maintenance, depending on location (e.g. primary school route)
Description & Connectivity
Location
Design Characteristics
►
►
On paved the paved shoulders of municipal roads which permit cyclists
►
►
Where/if appropriate, in lieu of paved shoulder adjacent to the travel lane, network connection can also be achieved by a separated facility – i.e. with a ‘Multi-Use Pathway’ within available right-of-way where spatial provision and existing infrastructure geometry permits.
Signed bicycle routes with paved shoulders should typically have shoulders between 1.5 and 2.0m in width depending on the volume, speed and mix of vehicular traffic.
►
As motor vehicle volumes increase, practitioners may consider wider paved shoulders or a buffered zone between the shoulder and travel lane.
►
A paved shoulder is a portion of a roadway which is contiguous with the travelled way and provides lateral support for the pavement structure Thea area can be used by cyclist and provides them with an area of riding that is separate from the motor vehicular travel portion of the roadway
13
Trails Concept Plan
Page 24 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Table 5: Off-Road Trail Type - Hiking / Foot Trail Hiking / Foot Trail Description & Connectivity
Surface Type, Location, Maintenance Requirements
Design Characteristics
►
►
Natural or granular surface.
►
►
Often located in natural areas such as woodlots, valley lands and wetlands.
►
Seasonal maintenance only as required.
Hiking / Foot Trails are located in sensitive natural areas or are the result of formalizing routes that were not plan or designed by the County. There often have evolved from use (i.e. a desire line between two locations) or have been created by a group such as a hiking club that has an established agreements with the land owner
Typically 0.75m to 1.5m in width with a natural earth surface. May include a granular surface or a boardwalk in areas where trail hardening is needed
4.2 Benefits of Trails There is clear evidence of the growing demand for facilities that support active forms of transportation and recreations, including an overall increase in active and sustainable living. In order to live these lifestyles, facilities that support active and sustainable modes of transportation need to be integrated into a person’s day to day activity for recreational and utilitarian purposes.
The demand to develop and adopt more sustainable land use and mobility strategies is increased. The development of infrastructure, policies and promotional strategies which respond to this growing demand for trail-related facilities can yield a number of benefits.
The benefits of active and sustainable transportation and recreation can include but are not limited to Environment, Health, Economy / Tourism, Housing, Education, Public Space, Community (Health & Safety) and Transportation. Table 6 provides a summary of the benefits which are directly and indirectly impacted as a result of investment in active and sustainable transportation.
14 14
Trails Concept Plan
Page 25 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Table 6: Active and Sustainable Transportation Benefits Benefits
Key Highlights
Environment
Community Health & Safety
Transportation
Asset Management
Community Building
Economic & Tourism
Active forms of transportation are both energy efficient and non polluting. When used, active modes of transportation conserve natural resources and provide large energy savings for the user as well as the community. By investing in active transportation or trail development, a community provides its residents with more opportunities for physical activity and improved air quality through reduced emissions. With more opportunities to be physically active, people are more likely to improve their quality of life by lead healthy and active lifestyles and reduce their risk of chronic diseases such as heart disease, stroke and diabetes. By increasing investment in trail and active transportation facilities, residents and visitors are provided with more mode choices. With an increase in the number of modal choices residents and visitors may feel less dependent on their single occupant vehicles. Increased investment and use of AT infrastructure can provide a means of appreciating and assisting in the protection of natural and cultural heritage resources. Similar to the transportation benefits, by decreasing the number of people on the road, communities may be able to increase the lifespan of their community assets. By engaging members of the community in the design and development of AT related infrastructure (including trails), it can bring together community residents. When residents become passionate and committed to an initiative there can be an increase in community spirit. When the design standard increases for community facilities it can, in some cases, spur on stewardship from local groups or engaged individuals. Increased investment in cycling and trail infrastructure can increase local tourism and investment. Cyclists are more willing to spend time and money in communities which clearly support cycling. As routes and infrastructure are developed there is also an increasing demand for supportive amenities. Communities may wish to invest in a local bike shop or tourism booth to promote cycling routes. In these cases, there are job opportunities and increased local investment which may occur.
15
Trails Concept Plan
Page 26 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
4.3 Trails Standards 4.3.1 Universal Trail Design The Accessibility for Ontarions with Disabilities (AODA) Act administers accessibility policies, standards and guidelines relevant to trails and recreational facilities. Approximately one in eight Canadians suffer from some type of physical disability, however this increases with age. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) states that “The people of Ontario support the right of persons of all ages with disabilities to enjoy equal opportunity and to participate fully in the life of the province”. Within the AODA, Bills 118 and proposed Bill 125 recognize the need to provide for accessibility standards, improve opportunities and facilitate the removal of barriers in order to enable persons with disabilities to fully participate in the life of the Province (Canada. Province of Ontario. Ministry of Community and Social Services. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act. By Ministry of Community and Social Services. Spring 2010.)
Universal Trail Design is a concept that takes into consideration the abilities, needs, and interests of the widest range of possible users. In regards to trail design, it means planning and developing a range of facilities that can be experienced by a variety of users of all abilities. The County should consider the latest standards outlined in the AODA for all relevant trail developments.
4.3.2 Wheelchair and Electric Scooter Users Trail users who rely upon wheelchairs (both motorized and non-motorized) and electric scooters have varying levels of mobility. Some use wheelchairs occasionally due to injury, however, others due to permanent paralysis and other medical conditions require the use of these devices on a full time basis. The ability of a wheelchair or scooter user to negotiate a trail will depend upon the type of trail and the type of wheelchair or scooter. Where trails are developed to be accessible to all users, there will be a need to obtain input from these users to determine the type of trail surface and width required. ‘All-terrain’ wheelchairs exist to promote potential use of non-universally accessible (hiking) trails. Such wheelchairs could be made available at a central County of Frontenac public facility or other trail head locations for use by individuals who require a wheelchair or scooter to travel around but would like to experience some of the non-universally accessible trails in the County.
16 16
Trails Concept Plan
Page 27 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
The principles of universal trail design can be summarized as follows:
Equitable use: provide opportunity for trail users to access, share and experience the same sections of trail rather than providing separate facilities;
Flexibility in use: provide different options for trail users in order to accommodate a variety of experiences and allow choice;
Simple, intuitive and perceptible information: whether conveying trail information through signage, maps or a web site, communicate using simple, straightforward forms and formats with easy to understand graphics and/or text;
Tolerance for error: design trails and information systems so as to minimize exposure to hazards, and indicate to users any potential risks or challenges that may be encountered;
Low physical effort: trails may provide for challenge but should not exceed the abilities of the intended users; where appropriate, rest areas should be provided; and
Size and space for approach and use: trails and amenities should provide for easy access, comfort and ease in their usage.
Where possible and practical, trails should be designed to be accessible to a wide range of users at all levels of ability. It must be recognized, however, that not all trails throughout the system can be fully accessible, though the use of all-terrain wheelchairs may increase accessibility to the trail network. Designing trails to be within the threshold (5%) for universal access will not only overcome this significant barrier but it will help to reduce the potential for erosion of the trail surface. The following are some additional considerations for making existing and new trails accessible:
Designers should consult the most current standards available;
Where the trail requires an accessibility solution that is above and beyond what is normally encountered, a representative of the County of Frontenac Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) and relevant Accessibility Advisory/Committee should be consulted early on in the process to determine if it is practical and desirable to design the specific trail to be fully accessible;
Where it has been determined that full accessibility is appropriate, the accessibility representative should be consulted during the detailed design process to ensure that the design is appropriate; and
Work collaboratively with the County of Frontenac Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) and relevant Accessibility Advisory/Committee to consider developing signage/content to clearly indicate trail accessibility conditions, which allow users with mobility-assisted devices to make an informed decision about using a particular trail prior to travelling on it.
17
Trails Concept Plan
Page 28 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
4.3.3 Personal Security and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) To the extent possible, trails should be designed to allow users to feel comfortable, safe, and secure. Although personal safety can be an issue for all, women, the elderly and children, are among the most vulnerable groups. Principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) should be considered and applied to help address security issues concerning trail use, particularly in locations where trails are infrequently used, isolated or in areas where security problems have occurred in the past. The four main underlying principles of CPTED are:
Natural Access Control: deters access to a target and creates a perception of risk to the offender;
Natural Surveillance: the placement of physical features and/or activities that provides for natural visibility or observation;
Territorial Reinforcement: defines clear borders of controlled space from public to semiprivate to private, so that users of an area develop a sense of proprietorship over it; and
Maintenance: allows for the continued use of space for its intended purpose1.
Specifically related to trails, the following CPTED-related design criteria include:
1
Good visibility by having routes pass through well-used public spaces;
Have good signage that tells users where they are along the trail system, in order to obtain help;
Provide “escape” routes from isolated areas at regular intervals;
Maintain sight lines and sight distances that are appropriately open to allow good visibility by users;
Provide trailhead parking in highly visible areas;
Minimize routing close to features that create hiding places such as stairwells, and dense shrubs;
Design underpasses and bridges so that users can see to the end and beyond; and
Use signs near entrances to identify and suggest alternative routes.
Crowe, Timothy D. “Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design.” CPTED Ontario Home Page. CPTED Ontario, 2002. Web. 30 Sept. 2010. http://www.cptedontario.ca/.
18 18
Trails Concept Plan
Page 29 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
4.3.4 Trail Maintenance and Operations Operations costs include on-going funding related to implementing the Trails Concept Plan, preparing the annual progress report, delivering safety, educational outreach and promotional programs, and performing network and infrastructure maintenance to achieve a state of good repair and to ensure all season use. This also includes staff resources, as well as management and administration. The incremental cost to maintain trails is relatively low. Generally speaking, most municipal agencies/Counties adjust maintenance budgets based on the number of kilometres of each facility and increase maintenance budgets relative to the length of new infrastructure added on an annual basis. Maintenance of mature off-road multi-use trails, particularly in greenways and parks can cost from $4,000 to $6,000 per linear kilometre of trail (3.5 m wide), depending on the level of service standard of a municipality. Annual maintenance can include drainage and storm channel maintenance, sweeping, clearing of debris, trash removal, weed control and vegetation management, mowing of grass along shoulders, minor surface repairs, repairs to trail fixtures (benches, signs) and other general repairs. Costs also can vary depending on whether the trail is in a road boulevard or in a linear greenway or park and whether it is paved or has a granular surface. New asphalt off-road trails also typically have lower maintenance costs in the first 10 years. An absolute dollar value for maintenance costs is not calculated for the concept trails network as the budget for maintenance will need to grow in an incremental fashion along with the incremental growth of the trails network. As each new network segment is added (either in boulevard on-road or off-road), the impact to the operations budget should be calculated by the County in working with Municipal staff so that it can be added into the annual maintenance budget request. Many jurisdictions have formalized programs to plan and construct trail systems, however the number that have formal programs for trail maintenance is lower. Telephone interviews conducted in 2004 with approximately a dozen southern Ontario municipalities highlight some overall scope of trail maintenance considerations and significant issues raised by municipalities/counties across Ontario:
Very few maintain their trails in winter. Of those that do, none reported maintaining all of their trails in winter. Generally winter maintained trails included only asphalt trails and those that are heavily used, or are main connections serving utilitarian purposes such as connections to schools and main bicycle/pedestrian commuter routes;
Several reported having defined maintenance standards for trails, based on trail-type. Many of those that did not currently have standards reported that they were working towards them;
Most have a call in/hot line for areas requiring emergency repairs, or areas where garbage containers are heavily used. None of the hot lines were trail specific, most often they were included with a parks or even municipal-wide hotline for parks, roads, infrastructure etc.;
19
Trails Concept Plan
Page 30 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
In most cases, respondents felt that they could do a better job at trail maintenance, but were limited by resources (staff resources/budget and time);
Most reported conducting an annual safety audit, in most cases this was included as part of their annual safety and security audit for parks, playgrounds and recreation facilities;
Many noted that proactive or preventative maintenance, especially with regard to trail surface condition, signing, trash and vandalism was a key success factor;
Most use trail patrols or supervisors to conduct a regular (i.e., as often as weekly) review to assess conditions, prioritize maintenance tasks and monitor known problem areas;
Some use maintenance logbooks to set out a schedule of tasks, priorities, standards to be achieved and method of tracking that the work has been completed. This method of tracking was also noted as useful for being able to predict which locations would require the highest level of maintenance;
In most cases, parks crews performed trail maintenance as part of their regular park maintenance role. Where extensive maintenance programs were reported, additional seasonal labour was added to the workforce (often summer students). Volunteer “adopta-trail” programs were also identified as useful for basic trail cleanup and monitoring;
Trail maintenance is generally handled under Parks Operations budgets, sometimes tracked as a separate trail maintenance budget, but most often grouped in with other parks maintenance budgets;
Trail maintenance costs range depending on the type of trail and location. Costs to maintain highly urbanized trails ranged from $4000-$6000/km per year, whereas costs to maintain rural trails (including rail trails) were significantly lower, ranging from less than $100/km year to $350/km per year. Tasks covered as part of these estimates included maintenance of trail drainage, storm channel and culvert maintenance, grading and minor topping up of trail surfaces, minor pothole repair, sweeping and clearing of debris, trash removal, mowing of clear zones, minor surface repairs and repairs to trail fixtures/furnishings;
Many respondents reported that asphalt surfaces on trails have a life span of approximately 15-20 years, and trails that were installed in 1980’s and earlier now require reconstruction, and in the process are generally being widened to meet higher levels of use/demand experienced today. Wider trails are also better for preventing damage to trail edges by municipal service vehicles, as vehicle wheels are less likely to roll over and break trail edges and less likely to create ruts in the soil beside the trail;
Trails that were properly constructed at initial installation had the fewest maintenance issues. Proper subgrade excavation, adequate base and proper drainage were noted as keys to trail longevity;
Many reported that erosion is a big challenge and that “trail hardening” with asphalt on sloped trails is the best way to prevent further erosion. Some reported trying other soil
20 20
Trails Concept Plan
Page 31 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
binding compounds for trails on slopes and reported only moderate success with these alternative materials;
Mowing grass along edges of trails is performed on a regular basis. Depending on trail location this may be weekly, biweekly, monthly or infrequently throughout the growing season. The width of the mown swath generally varies from 0.5m to 2.0m depending on the municipality and location. Mowing helps to keep clear zone open and can also help with the invasion of weeds into granular trail surfaces;
Several have trained their mower operators to be more observant while mowing and to take note of problem areas along the trails;
Garbage pickup is performed on a regular basis (i.e., 10 day cycle), with receptacles located at the ends of trail segments where they can be easily accessed by service vehicles;
Tasks performed on a seasonal basis include culvert cleanout and pruning to maintain trail clear zones;
Grading/grooming the surface of granular trails is generally performed once per year or as required after heavy storm events in areas prone to erosion;
Tasks performed every 3 to 5 years cycle include refurbishment of signs, cleaning and refurbishment site furnishings;
Tasks performed on an as-required basis include moving or marking obvious hazards within 24 hours of their identification, inspection/monitoring of trail areas prone to damage following heavy storms, repairs to vandalized items, minor repairs to structural elements such as bridges, trail surfaces, railings, benches, gates and signs; and
Major renovation or replacement of large items such as bridges, kiosks, gates, parking lots, and asphalt trail surfaces was generally described as a 10-20 year replacement item.
Maintenance programming should consider where/if equestrian uses are proposed and plan for maintenance accordingly, including program of grooming and education and design to accommodate equestrian use.
4.3.5 Winter Maintenance of Off-Road Trails Few counties/municipalities in Ontario maintain their off-road trails during winter months. For those municipalities that do offer winter maintenance services on trails, only certain routes are maintained and these tend to be primary routes that serve a commuter function to key destinations such as schools and community centers. The following are some general initiatives that are being used in other jurisdictions to identify candidates for winter trail maintenance and to develop priorities among those candidate routes.
a) Trail Function and Location
21
Trails Concept Plan
Page 32 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
The trail’s role in the overall transportation network and community connectivity (primary vs. secondary function);
The trail does not provide an alternate route to a nearby sidewalk or trail that is already being maintained in winter;
Determine if the trail is integral to the overall network such that it provides a primary route to schools, public facilities such as recreational centers and to other pedestrian generators such as senior’s homes, shopping and commercial establishments;
The trail is not merely a convenient short cut. If the trail is not available for winter use, the length of the detour required should be explored further. Although these should be explored further on a case-by-case individual basis, 500m could be used as a threshold guideline;
The trail connects dead end streets or cul-de-sacs where alternative routes do not exist;
Consideration is given to neighbouring land use(s) and how this relates to pedestrian origins, destinations and pedestrian generators; and
Consideration is given to trails that have historically received winter maintenance, but winter maintenance has not been formally adopted.
b) A Trail Design and Condition
The trail should be constructed to a minimum standard including: o
Adequate surface drainage to prevent ponding of water on the trail surface;
o
Minimum width (e.g., no less than 3.0m) and there is adequate access for maintenance equipment;
o
The trail has an asphalt surface (this factor may not apply if a snowblower is used instead of a plow); and
o
There should be no danger adjacent to the trail, such as a steep drop off that could be a hazard for equipment operators.
4.3.6 Trail Maintenance Planning This section describes a potential trail maintenance program for County of Frontenac. The general objectives of a trail monitoring and maintenance plan are to:
Provide safe, dependable and affordable levels of service;
Preserve infrastructure assets;
Protect the natural environment;
Enhance the appearance and health of the community;
Provide a reference framework against which to measure performance;
Provide the basis of a peer review that is comparable with other municipalities; and
22 22
Trails Concept Plan
Page 33 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Provide citizens and Council with a reference for expectations.
The first step in implementing a maintenance and management program is to determine its scope. Trail plans, maps, inventories, trail logs, traffic count information and condition surveys are all valuable sources of information for developing maintenance management systems. Table 7 outlines typical trail maintenance activities that the County should include as part of the development of a trail maintenance program that is tailored to suit the County’s needs. The maintenance plan below applies to trail corridors that are under the jurisdiction of the municipality. The trails that are owned or operated by other agencies or private interests are not required to adhere to this plan, but could take these guidelines under advisement. Tasks have been grouped according to the frequency with which they would typically be performed:
Immediately (within 24 to 48 hours);
Regularly (weekly/biweekly/monthly);
Seasonally;
Annually;
Every 3 to 5 years; and
Every 10 to 20 years.
23
Trails Concept Plan
Page 34 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Table 7: Trail Maintenance Planning Frequency
Maintenance Opportunities for Off-Road Trails
Immediate
(within 24 hours of becoming aware of the situation through a “hotline”, email, other notification or observation)
Regularly (weekly/biweekly/ monthly)
As a minimum, mark, barricade and sign the subject area to warn trail users, or close the trail completely until the problem can be corrected. Remove vegetation and/or windfalls, downed branches, etc., where traffic flow on the trail is being impaired or the obstruction is resulting in a sight line issue. Remove hazard trees that have been identified. Repair or replace items that have been vandalized or stolen/removed. This is especially important for regulatory signs that provide important information about trail hazards such as road crossings, steep grades, and sharp curves. Removal of trash in overflowing containers or material that has been illegally dumped. Repair of obstructed drainage systems causing flooding that poses a hazard to trail users or that is resulting in deterioration that poses an immediate safety hazard. Monitor trail areas and structures that are prone to erosion after severe summer storms and repair as required. Repairs to structural elements on bridges such as beams, railings, access barriers and signs. Trail patrols/inspections should review the trail conditions (as often as weekly in high-use areas), to assess conditions and prioritize maintenance tasks and monitor known problem areas. Mow grass along edges of trails (in open settings only). Depending on trial location this may be done weekly, biweekly, or monthly and the width can vary according to the location (typically 0.5 to 1.0m). This helps to keep the clear zone open and can slow the invasion of weeds into granular trail surfaces. Not all trails will have mown edges. In woodland and wetland areas, pruning and brushing is typically the only vegetation maintenance to be undertaken. Regular garbage pickup (10 day cycle or more frequent for heavily used areas). Restock trailhead information kiosks with brochures as needed. Repair within 30 days or less, partially obstructed drainage systems causing intermittent water backups that do not pose an immediate safety hazard, but that if left unchecked over time will adversely affect the integrity of the trail and/or any other trail infrastructure or the surrounding area
24 24
Trails Concept Plan
Page 35 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Frequency Seasonally
Maintenance Opportunities for Off-Road Trails
Annually
Patching/minor repair of trail surfaces and removal of loose rocks from the trail bed. Culvert cleanout where required. Top up approaches to bridges. Planting, landscape rehabilitation, pruning/beautification. Installation/removal of seasonal signage. Conduct an annual safety audit. This task is not necessarily specific to trails and may be included with general annual safety audits for parks, playgrounds and recreation facilities. Evaluate support facilities/trailside amenities to determine repair and/or replacement needs. Examine trail surface to determine the need for patching and grading. Grading/grooming the surface of granular trails, and topping up of wood chip trails. Pruning/vegetation management for straight sections of trail and areas where branches may be encroaching into the clear zone. This task is more of a preventative maintenance procedure. Cuttings may be chipped on site and placed appropriately or used as mulch for new plantings. Remove branches from the site unless they can be used for habitat (i.e. brush piles in a woodlot setting), or used as part of the rehabilitation of closed trails. Where invasive species are being pruned and/or removed, branches and cuttings should be disposed of in an appropriate manner. Inspect and secure all lose side rails, bridge supports decking (ensure any structural repairs meet the original structural design criteria). Aerate soils in severely compacted areas.
Every 3 to 5 years
Cleaning and refurbishment of signs, benches and other trailside amenities.
Every 10 to 20 years
Resurface asphalt trails (assume approximately every 15 years). Replace or reconstruct granular trails (assume approximately every 15 years, but this may not be necessary if adjustments/repairs are made on an annual basis). Major renovation or replacement of large items such as bridges, kiosks, gates, parking lots, benches, etc.
25
Trails Concept Plan
Page 36 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
4.3.7 Trip End Facilities and Staging Areas Network continuity, connectivity and feasibility are enhanced through the implementation of endof-trip facilities and staging areas. In some cases, amenities can be a factor which enacts an individual to decide whether or not to make a trip using an active mode of transportation. Staging areas can be appropriately designed to reinforce commitment to promoting trails and that may include lighting, sitting / rest areas, parking areas, signage, bicycle parking, loading / unloading areas, garbage receptacles, washroom and amenity buildings and gates / access barriers. In rural areas, staging areas may play a key role in the marketing package for trail use and tourism. If properly implemented and promoted, it may help to reduce the tendency for trail users to park on rural roadsides to access trails. As a guide for future staging area development the County should consider a standardized approach. Figure 2 illustrates a staging area hierarchy and Table 8 provides additional details regarding the amenities which could be included in each of the designs. Maps enclosed depict potential staging (parking/trailhead locations). Figure 2: Staging Area Hierarchy
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
*Intensity of design treatment would be determined based on area and surrounding characteristics as assessed County Staff as a guide
Limited Amenities
Fully Serviced
26 26
Trails Concept Plan
Page 37 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Table 8: Network Amenities in Staging Areas Hierarchy
Amenities Parking
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Y
Y
Y
Y
Rest Areas Lighting Signage
N
Washrooms
N
Drop Off Areas Garbage
N
Shade
Green Infrastructure
Gates / Barriers Loading Zone Shelter Portable Water
N
Additional Considerations
Portable washrooms to be implemented (Level 3) May - October
27
Trails Concept Plan
Page 38 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
4.4 Trail Opportunities The input received over the course of the study from the public, steering committee and staff members has led to the development of four (4) strategic trail opportunities in the County. This section provides a description of these opportunities.
4.4.1 Completing and Providing Connection to the “Spine” of Network Trails The K&P Trails forms a “spine” which runs generally north-south. The Cataraqui Trail and the Trans Canada Trail form east-west “spines” through the County. These are critical and major existing components of the County’s trail network – stitching together both on-road an off-road facilities. New trails should provide connection(s) to these spines. Priority should be given to completing the K&P Trail and other Trail initiatives with connections to the “spine” Trails.
4.4.2 Connecting Towns and Villages to Natural Areas Improving trail connections from towns and villages in the County to the Provincial Parks, management areas and other community parks represents a major opportunity for the County. This will increase resident’s access to trails and recreation opportunities.
4.4.3 Connecting to Natural Areas Connecting natural areas to each other within the County and also providing connections to significant natural areas outside the County, such as Algonquin Provincial Park, provide opportunities to boost tourism and allow trail users to experience the many natural amenities in Frontenac County.
4.4.4 Connecting to Towns and Villages Improving trail connections between Towns and Villages in the County to Towns and Villages and the surrounding Counties will increase resident’s access to other population centers and will improve the overall connectivity of the active transportation network.
28 28
Trails Concept Plan
Page 39 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
4.5 Proposed Trail Concept Plan Following the review of background documentation, inventory of the existing active transportation network and gathering of public input through consultation, the project team undertook the exercise, recognizing the above trail opportunities, to identify potential routes which could be added to the existing network. The identified routes include:
K&P Trail: Complete the K&P Trail to Wilbur in Frontenac County, in collaboration with Lanark County and Renfrew County. The trail should ultimately be connected all the way to Calabogie in the future.
Verona - Frontenac Provincial Park: Connect Verona to Frontenac Provincial Park with a signed route along Desert Lake Road and Bedford Road.
Sharbot Lake - Sharbot Lake Provincial Park: Connect Sharbot Lake to Sharbot Lake Provincial Park via the K&P Trail with a paved shoulder facility on Highway 7.
Tichborne - Mountain Grove: Connect Tichborne to Mountain Grove in relationship to the development of a new route connecting the K&P Trail and the central spine of Frontenac County to Bon Echo Provincial Park with a paved shoulder facility on Highway 38 from Tichborne to Parham. From Parham, a signed route should be implemented along Long Lake Road to Mountain Grove.
Arden - Myers Cave: Connect the K&P Trail from Arden to Myers Cave with signed routes along Henderson Road, Harlow Road and Myers Cave Road.
K&P Trail - Ompah - Plevna: Implemented a signed route along South Lavant Road and County Road 509 from the K&P Trail to Ompah and to Plevna. Part of this route is already in place around Ompah.
Verona - Bellrock: Connect Verona to Bellrock via Bellrock Road with a new paved shoulder and signage. A portion of this segment is already paved with shoulder. The extension of the facility westward into the County of Lennox and Addington should be considered.
Verona - Tichborne - Parham - Bellrock Loop: Use the K&P Trail from Verona to Tichborne as a ‘loop’. The new route from Tichborne to Parham along Highway 38 and the proposed route along Bellrock Road - from the K&P Trail in Verona. Complete the loop along with the development of a signed route from Parham to Bellrock along Raymo Road, Echo Lake Road, Oak Flats Roads, 2 Lake Road, Snider Road and 1 Lake Road. This new route should also provide an on-road connection to the Second Depot Lake conservation area.
Godfrey - Westport: Connect the K&P Trail in Godfrey to Westport via Westport Road with a paved shoulder facility type. The County of Frontenac should consider working with Leeds and Grenville County to ensure the portion of this connection in Leeds and Grenville County is completed.
29
Trails Concept Plan
Page 40 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Westport - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with Leeds and Grenville County and the City of Kingston to complete a paved shoulder facility along Perth Road between Westport and Kingston through Perth Road and Inverary in the County of Frontenac. Due to space limitations through the community of Inverary a signed route is proposed through the village.
Battersea - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with the City of Kingston to extend the existing paved should facility on Battersea Road north into the County travelling though Sunbury and Battersea. Due to space limitations through the community of Battersea, a signed route is proposed through the village.
Inverary - Sunbury: A signed route should be installed Moreland Dixon Road to connect the communities of Inverary and Sunbury as well as to provide a connection between the paved shoulder facilities on Perth Road and Battersea Road.
Frontenac Islands - Winter Dock: A paved shoulder with signed route facility should be installed along Road 7051 to 96 - to provide a connection from the Frontenac Islands winter dock and to enhance perceived safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
These routes combined with the existing active transportation network were combined to form the trail concept plan. The enclosed appendix Maps highlights the trail opportunity identified for each proposed route and the facility type of each proposed route.
30 30
Trails Concept Plan
Page 41 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
4.6 Prioritization / Ranking Tool The following tool was originally developed by the Ministry of Transportation Sustainable Transportation Office for use as a preliminary cycle tourism route selection process and tool for the Province and its partners to consider in the development of a potential provincial-scale cycle touring network. It has been adapted for use as a priority route selection tool in Frontenac County. The tool includes three key parts which form a process to identify the suitability and feasibility of candidate routes. Part i: Identifies criteria and illustrates a process through which a candidate cycling route is identified for inclusion in a province-wide cycling network. Part ii: Provides a description and considerations for scoring each route by individual route selection criteria and is intended to be used as a resource for conducting the route evaluation. Part iii: Is a worksheet which can be used to conduct the route evaluation.
4.6.1 Using the Tool The first step is to use the worksheet (Part iii) to apply the High-level Route Selection Criteria (Criteria A, B & C in flow chart) to identify and score potential candidate routes. The three HighLevel Route Selection Criteria are meant to identify routes which are appropriate for further investigation. The criteria should be assessed based on a 3-point scoring system:
3
The route categorically meets/fulfills the criterion (i.e. all descriptions / consideration items are met / fulfilled)
2
The route generally meets / fulfils the criterion (i.e. most of the descriptions / considerations are met / fulfilled)
1
The route generally does not meet / fulfill the criterion (i.e. less than half of the descriptions / considerations are met / fulfilled)
0
The route does not meet / fulfill the criterion at all (i.e. none of the descriptions / considerations are met / fulfilled)
N/A This criterion is not applicable to the route being evaluated In order for a route to proceed to Steps 2 and 3 in the worksheet, it should achieve a score of 6 or more in this first step. Routes identified through Step 1, are then assessed in more detail by applying a set of “Experiential” (Step 2) and “Safety and Feasibility” (Step 3) criteria. Each of these criteria is scored based on the 3-point scoring system noted above.
31
Trails Concept Plan
Page 42 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Assessing the suitability of a candidate route involves adding the individual scores and then dividing that number by the number of scored criteria (criteria which are N/A will not be considered part of the evaluation of this particular route). By way of example, given that there are 24 criteria in steps 2 and 3, if each is scored 2 the total would be 48 (i.e. 24 x 2 = 48). You then divide the resulting value (e.g. 48) by the number of criteria scored (i.e. 48/24 = 2) which gives a final score of 2. The final score for each route will range between 0 (low suitability) and 3 (high suitability) as a priority route for Frontenac County. Please refer to the Suitability Index (Figure 2) to compare a route’s score to the level of suitability. Figure 2: Suitability Index
Suitability Index Route Score
0
1
0.5
5
1.5
2
A score of 2 or more indicates the route is considered suitable for inclusion in the Network
Low
3
2.5 5
High
4.6.2 Applying the Route Selection Criteria The above route selection criteria were used to undertake a more detailed feasibility assessment of the eleven potential routes identified above in Section 4.5. Table 9 highlights the final suitability score for each route. The complete assessment of each route can be found in Appendix B. Table 9: Proposed Routes Suitability Score Proposed Route
Suitability Score
K&P Trail (completion)
2.5
Verona - Frontenac Provincial Park
2.1
Sharbot Lake - Sharbot Lake Provincial Park
2.0
Tichborne - Mountain Grove
2.1
Arden - Myers Cave
2.1
K&P Trail - Ompah - Plevna
2.1
Verona - Bellrock
2.3
Verona - Tichborne - Parham - Bellrock Loop
2.4
Godfrey - Westport
2.3
Westport Road - Kingston
2.2
Battersea - Kingston
2.2
Inverary - Battersea
2.2
Frontenac Islands - Winter Dock
2.1
32 32
Trails Concept Plan
Page 43 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
5.0 Implementation and Phasing Plan The County of Frontenac Trails Concept plan is meant to guide the future decision making when developing, designing and constructing facilities. The above trail types, standards and opportunities are intended to provide the necessary foundation for the County of Frontenac.
5.1 Funding Opportunities The costs of implementing the trails concept plan should not be the sole responsibility of the County. The implementation of the plan including budgeting for and paying for the design, implementation and maintenance of the facilities should be a collaborative effort based on the pursuit of external funding sources and partnership opportunities.
The County should regularly explore additional partnership and funding opportunities from all levels of government and pursue all available sources of funding for facility development as well as programming. Table 11 below highlights some potential funding sources which could be explored at the federal and provincial levels. Table 11: Funding Opportunities for Trail/Cycling Infrastructure Funding Opportunities Federal / Provincial Gas Tax
Additional Details
For the federal program please refer to: http://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/plan/gtf-fte-eng.html For the provincial program please refer to: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/service-commitment/gas-taxprogram.shtml
Transport Canada’s MOST (Moving on Sustainable Transportation)
For details on the MOST program and the projects that fall in-line with their funding alternatives please refer to: http://data.tc.gc.ca/archive/eng/programs/environment-mostaboutmost-685.htm
ecoMobility (TDM) Grant Program
For details on the ecoMobility Grant Program please refer to: http://data.tc.gc.ca/archive/eng/programs/environmentecomobility-menu-eng-144.htm
Federation of Canadian Municipalities Green Municipal Fund
For additional details regarding the Green Municipal Fund and potential funding alternatives please refer to: http://www.fcm.ca/home/programs/green-municipal-fund.htm
Healthy Communities Fund
For additional details regarding the Healthy Communities Fund please refer to: http://www.mhp.gov.on.ca/en/healthycommunities/hcf/default.asp
33
Trails Concept Plan
Page 44 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Funding Opportunities
Additional Details
Trans Canada Trail Funding and Federal Fund Matching
For additional information regarding trail funding alternatives please refer to: http://old1.tctrail.ca/trail_funding.php
Federal and Provincial Infrastructure / Stimulus Programs
For Federal Government infrastructure stimulus fund details please refer to: http://www.bcfontario.ca/english/isf/guide.html For Provincial Government infrastructure stimulus fund details please refer to: http://www.moi.gov.on.ca/en/infrastructure/stimulus.asp
Ontario Trillium Foundation
For details regarding potential funding alternatives please refer to: http://grant.otf.ca/
Corporate Environmental Funds (Shell and MEC)
For additional details regarding MEC’s fund to preserve recreationally significant landscapes please refer to: http://www.mec.ca/AST/ContentPrimary/Community/CommunityC ontributions/LandAcquisition.jsp
Corporate Donations
Money or service in kind and have been contributed by a number of large and small corporations over the years
Ontario Trails Strategy Funding
As part of the Ontario Sport and Recreation Communities Fund: http://www.grants.gov.on.ca/GrantsPortal/en/OntarioGrants/Grant Opportunities/PRDR006918
Ontario Cycling Strategy Funding
For additional details regarding the #CycleON strategy please refer to: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/pubs/cycling/index.shtml
Tourism Development Fund
For additional details regarding the Tourism Development fund please refer to: http://www.grants.gov.on.ca/GrantsPortal/en/OntarioGrants/Grant Opportunities/OSAPQA005130
Service Club Support
Lions, Rotary and Optimist clubs who often assist with highly visible projects at the community level.
Private Citizen Donation / Bequeaths
Can also include tax receipts for donors where appropriate
34 34
Trails Concept Plan
Page 45 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
5.2 Unit Costs An important part of implementation is the costing of a proposed route. Being able to accurately estimate the costs associated with the implementation of a specific route is very important especially when it comes to setting aside the appropriate funds in an annual budget or when pursuing potential funding opportunities or partnerships. Appendix C provides a number of typical unit prices for projects in Ontario.
5.3 Opinion of Probable Cost for Proposed Routes The following section will provide a high level cost estimate for the proposed routes from section 4.5 Table 12 provides a summary of the cost estimates Table 12: Proposed Routes – Opinion of Probable Cost ROUTE
FACILITY TYPE
DIST ANC E
UNIT
VALUE (CAD)
ESTIMATED COST (CAD)
K&P Trail: Complete the K&P Trail to Wilbur in Frontenac County, in collaboration with Lanark County and Renfrew County the trail should ultimately be connected all the way to Calabogie in the future
multi-use trail
67.5
linear KM
$45,830.00
$3,091,692
9.7
linear KM
$45,000.00
$438,300
9.9
linear KM
$75,000.00
$743,250
7.0
linear KM
$40,000.00
$279,600
5.8
linear KM
$40,000.00
$232,800
35.0
linear KM
$40,000.00
$1,399,600
signed route
15.9
linear KM
$1,000.00
$15,900
paved shoulder
3.5
linear KM
$55,000.00
$192,500
2014
To White Lake Road
2015
To Tichborne
2016
To Crow Lake Road
2017
To Sharbot Lake
Post To County Boundary 2017 (Wilbur) Verona - Frontenac Provincial Park: Connect the Verona to Frontenac Provincial Park with a signed route along Desert Lake Road and Bedford Road. Sharbot Lake - Sharbot Lake Provincial Park: Connect Sharbot Lake to Sharbot Lake Provincial Park via the K&P Trail with a paved shoulder facility on Highway 7.
multi-use trail multi-use trail multi-use trail multi-use trail multi-use trail
35
Trails Concept Plan
Page 46 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Tichborne - Mountain Grove: Connecting Tichborne to Mountain Grove would service as the first part in the development of a new route connecting the K&P Trail and the central spine of Frontenac County to Bon Echo Provincial Park. A paved shoulder facility is proposed on Highway 38 from Tichborne to Parham. From Parham, a signed route should be implemented along Long Lake Road to Mountain Grove. Arden - Myers Cave: The second part of a new route connecting the K&P Trail would be to connect Arden to Myers Cave with signed routes along Henderson Road, Harlow Road and Myers Cave Road. K&P Trail - Ompah - Plevna: A signed route should be implemented along South Lavant Road and County Road 509 from the K&P Trail to Ompah and then to Plevna. Part of this route is already in place around Ompah. Verona - Bellrock: A new paved shoulder facility would connect Verona to Bellrock via Bellrock Road. The extension of the facility westward into the County of Lennox and Addington should be considered. Verona - Tichborne - Parham Bellrock Loop: A loop can be created that would use the K&P Trail from Verona to Tichborne, the new route from Tichborne to Parham along Highway 38 and the new route along Bellrock Road from the K&P Trail in Verona. The loop is completed with the development of a signed route from Parham to Bellrock along Raymond Road, Echo Lake Road, Oak Flats Roads, 2 Lake Road, Snider Road and 1 Lake Road. This new route should also provide an on-road connection to the Second Depot Lake conservation area.
signed route
17.4
linear KM
$1,000.00
$17,400
paved shoulder
3.5
linear KM
$55,000.00
$192,500
signed route
31.6
linear KM
$1,000.00
$31,600
signed route
21.9
linear KM
$1,000.00
$21,900
paved shoulder
10.7
linear KM
$55,000.00
$588,500
signed route
28.2
linear KM
$1,000.00
$28,200
36 36
Trails Concept Plan
Page 47 of 149
AgendaItem#6• County of Frontenac Trails Concept Plan September 2014 | MMM Group Limited | Final Draft
Godfrey - Westport: A new paved shoulder facility would connect the K&P Trail in Godfrey to Westport via Westport Road. The County of Frontenac should work with Leeds and Grenville County to ensure the portion of this connection in Leeds and Grenville County is completed. Westport - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with Leeds and Grenville County and the City of Kingston to complete a paved shoulder facility along Perth Road between Westport and Kingston through Perth Road and Inverary in the County of Frontenac. Due to space limitations through the community of Inverary a signed route is proposed through the village. Battersea - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with the City of Kingston to extend the existing paved should facility on Battersea road north into the County travelling though Sunbury and Battersea. Due to space limitations through the community of Battersea a signed route is proposed through the village. Inverary - Sunbury: A signed route should be installed Moreland Dixon Road to connect the communities of Inverary and Sunbury as well as provide a connection between the paved shoulder facilities on Perth Road and Battersea Road. Frontenac Islands - Winter Dock: A paved shoulder with signed route should be installed to provide a connection from the Frontenac Islands winter doc along route along Road 7051 to Road 96.
paved shoulder
25.2
linear KM
$55,000.00
$1,386,000
signed route
0.6
linear KM
$1,000.00
$600
paved shoulder
32.3
linear KM
$55,000.00
$1,776,500
signed route
2.0
linear KM
$1,000.00
$2,000
paved shoulder
23.1
linear KM
$55,000.00
$1,270,500
signed route
4.2
linear KM
$1,000.00
$4,200
signed route
2.1
linear KM
$1,000.00
$2,100
paved shoulder
2.1
linear KM
$55,000.00
$115,500
Off-Road K&P Trail
67.5
linear KM
$45,830.00
$3,091,691
Off-Road Civil and Structural Works On-Road Paved Shoulder
Lump Sum
Allow
Allow
$500,000
100.4
linear KM
$55,000.00
$5,522,000
123.9
linear KM
$1,000.00
$123,900
On-Road Signed Route Total
$9,237,591
37
Trails Concept Plan
Page 48 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
6.0 Conclusion This proposed Trails Concept Plan - for on-road and off-road facilities - represents a significant County-wide investment in trails, recreation, and active transportation opportunity in the County of Frontenac. The Plan has been developed to support the strategic and long-term development of its network and is submitted as a final draft document to the County. This document should be considered a ‘living document’ and evolved as County needs and opportunities present themselves. The County and its partners are encouraged to use this document to guide the development of priority projects and to maintain the development of both the County’s on- and off-road trails network. The County of Frontenac should maintain the active engagement of the Trails Advisory Committee and consider the establishment of an Annual Stakeholder Meeting with all related stakeholders including local municipalities - to oversee the implementation, management and promotion of trails in the County of Frontenac. The stakeholder group could include representatives from the County of Frontenac, the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC), Municipal representatives including the Departments of Public Works, the KFL&A Public Health, and organizations such as the Heart and Stroke Foundation, etc. Within ten (10) years the County of Frontenac should consider revisiting the Trails Concept Plan to revise and update it - and track and update progress to Council on an annual basis. The update should evaluate the progress made and develop a new set of priorities for the County for the next ten (10) years.
The study team at MMM Group, thanks the staff, members of the public, local stakeholders and members of the Trails Advisory Committee who gave their time and input in the develop of this Plan – and especially those who actively participated in the public open house and project meetings along with those who provided their written or verbal input to the study team.
38 38
Trails Concept Plan
Page 49 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Maps
Trails Concept Plan
Page 50 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
MAP 1 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN
BLACK DONALD LAKE
NO RC AN
AM
LN
TC
KE
UN
LA
JUNIPER LAKE H DODGE LAKE
September 2014
P LN
YW MIST
Y
RO
N
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
ER RD
"
MACKIE LAKE
CAMP LAKE
"
" “>
"
MAIR LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE ROUNDCAMP LAKE
"
RD
REDHORSE LAKE
IN
CH
HY
DR
O LN WOLFE LAKE
BUCKSHOT LAKE
LN LY AL
S
LN ULE
RD R BU RD ES UT
CH ED GG
"
"
ARDOCH
LN
RD
CLARENDON RD
FANNING LN
RD
LN
LN T IN
PO
N
A
SL
M IC
WN
LN NS
LEE RD
RD HANNA
RD
LLE RD MULVI
DEVIL
RD S W RE ND MC A
LN OD WO RD HA
LN AS
RIS TM
CH LN T IN PO T
RD
KE LA
DEN BR AD
RVEY
MCGA
EK RD
LN RD ST AF FO
CA
BREWER LAKE
EVEL
WASHBU
BEAR CRE
RAMP ARTS RD IN AL
"
Y RD
SUNBURY
BEE RD CRANBERRY LAKE LN GE RID
DOG LAKE
CARD
" SUNBUR
J
T EC PL COLLINS LAKE MA
"
ORMS
LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE
N
S RD
L RD
N RD
RD
DIXO N
SAND
" c
INVERARY LAKE
CRANESNEST LAKE RD ILLS RD TH CE RN PLA BU ING LA RY UR CA R A LN DOG LAKE
"
"
"
LL
ROUND LAKE LAKE RD
ROUND
RD
"
BATTERSEA
NA
RD NFIELD
A RD
TH
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LN AN LE MC
RN RD
LN
EX LAKE RD AL
"
INVERARY "
TRAVERSE LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE
LN
HIDEAWA Y LN
KOEN
EY
SONN
RD
R PE
G
LN
HIN FIS RD
MILBU
RD
DAVID SO
“ES RD
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE
UPPER ROCK LAKE
LN EIL
GREE
"
HOLM
N
VA
NE
CR
PERT H RD
WIL
SMITH
"
O’N
LN
D
FISHING LAKE
" H RD c
DUFF
Y RD DGES
R AY
CROW LAKE
WALS
RD
EY RD
HT SL
TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
R LIV
ON RD
ME R
ISON
BATT ERSE
R RI
GIL
LL VA
RD
CEDA
LN
LN BA C
GR BIL LY
KE RD
ER LA DRAP
BENJA
SILL
A LN
LN
LAKE
BURRIDGE
GARRET T RD
RD
LN
NO
YO
SE
MIN LN
RD
D
ORD
WILMER
LN E ID FS IF CL LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
DALE
RD NH AM SYDE
BAY LN
(outside Frontenac County)
DEAN
"
C RD
KN IG
HARP
ER
Existing Off-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route.
S BA YR
BEDF RETR
H RD
MUR VALE RD
STAG E
38 ROAD RD
SH EIL
RD N IL TO W
RIDA FLO
COAC
GA
S PO
LN
KEEL
OPINICON LAKE LN OPINICON LAKE TE GA E IC FF HART LAKE TO
HINGE LAKE
"
"
PERTH ROAD
N RD HOGA SYDENHAM LAKE
; " )
SU MA
BU RE
(outside Frontenac County)
INDIAN LAKE NORW AY RD
SPAFFORDTON
“RAILTON
FORE ST RD
N RD
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
C MA
OPINIC
ERNIE LN
RD
LN
S
MURTO
RAILT ON
BUCK LAKE
E LN
"
RD
SA
LN ART
RD
S BA
GORR
"
RD BAY
MORR
S MA
A
RD
"
" c " c RD > " " BELL “=
CAMP
"
TAGG
G AU SS
BB
NELL
ST
RUTLSYDENHAM ED GE RD
R BE
NOBL
MCC ON
LN
RD EA
; " ) J” “>
RD
EAT LN
ST
HOLL ALTO N
NOTR
MCLE AN RD
EEL MAN RD
ST
“HARROWSMITH " > c " HA “>
RROW " c SMITH
SHALES LN DRAPER LAKE
DARLING LAKE CRONK LAKE BU LL SE YE LN
"
RO
RD
"
"
RD
"
RD
ER
RO
D RD EFOR
RD WE
TO
WIL
OK
CH HIN
RD
QUAR
K RD
RD
RBEC
ESON
FREE ALTO N
SLIDE LAKE
EL
GOULD LAKE
KNOWLTON LAKE
"
ND
E DAME
WOLFE
ELLE
SWAM P
JAMI
UVEN RD
R
LN
LN
"
LA
YARK
E RD
VANL
LE
D
N
S
RD
LE
RD
S AK BL
AN
TO
EW
POLLYWOG LAKE
FRYE
LABELLE LAKE N L YE FR
RD
AC E
"
" " J “=
BIG CLEAR LAKE
BUCK LAKE
"
SOUTH OTTER LAKE N "
DOE LAKE
JOHN MART IN LN
SDAL
HARTINGTON
"
N LN
ALES
EST
MASO
IP
CLEAR LAKE RD LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
LITTLE SALMON LAKE FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
SH
RD W
KE RD
E RD
C M
NORTH OTTER LAKE
"
SH E LN
KINGSFORD LAKE
HOLLEFORD LAKE
LS LN
MAN RD FORD
BOYC
TUNDRA LN
BIRCH LAKE
"
LN FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE
RD
DEVIL LAKE
"
MA N LN
LY’S
MABE
RD GER
RY
TROU
E
RD S
WIL
OLD MINE LN
TT
HAMBLY LAKE
ORTH RD
EEL LAKE
ARTH
BL M HA
"
ES
CHRISTIE LAKE
"
ALPIN
LN GROUSE
N
" “= c "
"
VERONA LAKE "
LN Y
CANOE LAKE LN TROUT LN KE LA ER MINER LAKE
EY THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LN ABRA MS LN DESERT LAKE
D
YORK
VERONA
E RD HU FF
ER
ND RD
VE BAN RO K S NA T ST
NA SA
T LAK
RO
VERO
LONG
GERMAN
PETW
RD
R
BAUD ER DR
INB
RD
RD
SW AM
CK
PETWORTH
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Rideau Heritage Trails Rideau Heritage Trails
M O
RE
VANLUVEN LAKE
RO
"
WALL
LN
KS
LN
DESER
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES TOBIN
POND LILY LAKE
IN M
RD
SON
DE
E BE
HOWES LAKE
RD
"
E LA
RD
RD
EV E
MILLER
"
LN AH IAW WOLFE LAKE
“LONG POND LAKE
RD
KE R
HILL RD
Y
"
RD
W IL
LATIM ER RD
RD
KE
"
BROO
JAM
FR E
PICCADILLY RAIG C
"
"
SANGSTER LAKE
D O
G
"
NEW
WOLFE LAKE
LN
FORTY FOOT RD
RD CLOW
RD WNS
LAKE RD SECOND
BR O
ARENA BDRY RD
RD
PONDLILY LAKE NAPANEE LAKE
BR AD
BUCK BAY
KE RD FOUR TH LA
SON RD WILKIN D R E R O O M Y M AR
QUE BELL
P RD
ER
BURRIDGE LAKE BAY RD
N LN POTSPOON LAKE GARTER LAKE
POLI LN
MCNICHOLS LN THIRTY ISLAND LAKE
GODFREY
"
POO
BRIGGS LN T LN
EN
RD
D
RD RT PO ST HENRY LN
GRE
N BOBS LAKE
KE
LN
R
LACKE Y LN
LA LFE
ES
N
N
L
M OW LN EA NB SU
POTS
WE
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
T LA
BELLROCK
Existing Conditions
GIL
LEVE
SN ID CARD LN
FIRS
Legend
O
RAINB
"
COLE LAKE
OAK FLA TS RD
O M
YL
N
WO
ST. ANDREW LAKES
MOORE RD
KE
RL
LN
T WIT
" HILLC
LN BOBS LAKE RR BA LN TIMS RD KE LA E HIT BYCROFT LN W WHITE LAKE
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
CLAIR RD
COLE
HIC
RD
LN
LN
OU
NAP LN
T
"
S
RD LL BA ST. ANDREW LAKES
CHIPPEGO LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
BOBS LAKE GR RIDERS EE LN NB AY RD
RD
DE
BURNS RD
N LN
LEA
OC
EEK
D BA
BELK
AN
LIP
FISH CR
"
RD
RD
UD
IL
"
"
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
"
BOBS LAKE
R LN
T IT
YORK
SO
ELBOW LAKE PH
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
ALDE
W
BOBS
TICHBORNE
"
" DUNCAN LAKE
"
G
DE
RD
E RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARKFIFTH DEPOT LAKE RD KE LA TH FIF
SPARKS LN
RID
BOBS LAKE
BU R
"
J " > “c
“> PARHAM "
RAYMO
RSON
NEADOW LN
RD AN DE
RVILL
RD NO
K RD
WAGA
NE
E LN
RD
EAGLE LAKE
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
LO
CROW LAKE
S LN
GOOD RD
ECHO LAKE EC HO LAKE RD
D
HA
ALF
INT
N LN
D RD
O PO
ERSO PATT
R
" OPEONG
SUCKER LAKE
"
CROW LAKE
D
BE
W
"
CA
Y
ROCK LAKE
RD
RO
E
LN
D OO
ME R
N
LIN
SHARBOT LAKE
H CROW LAKE RD
"
LN
NG
D
RD
DL
" OLLY
ST. GEORGE LAKE LEGGAT LAKE
NN
R
BENDER RD
DUCHARME RD
LONG LAKE MINNIE
CRON
ER
RTH
LN
N
UR
MCLEAN RD
K EE
AG W
RO
O
CR
B
"
ST M AR
ELBOW LAKE RD UE GUIG
CROSS RD
D
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
LE
NR
IN
SH IB
YO TR
RD
$ +
D BA
U ST
HM ON
ON
N O’REILLY LAKE LN
SON RD
BABCOCK RD
RIC
LS
N LN
RD
D
R “D ON “c NN > ; " ) " J c " "
“>
STEELE
LN
ER RD
HA
SILVER LAKE
CA
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
CA
RD
EE RD
BR EW
"
c
SHARBOT LAKE
NE
D
Y LAKE ORIELL
LN
FOX RD
N
BLACK LAKE SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EM PIR E LN
BOBBY RD
NALD
HIGHWAY 7 "
W
TENA
AK ER
THOMP
RV E
WHITE LAKE
RD
ND
7
LAKE RD
CARNAHAN LAKE MCDO
DE
SL
LA
BR ES
RD W
D LN WES
NORTH
T EN
RD
LN
LD
BA S
BASS LAKE DUN
LOUDEN LN
RD
RD
CK
D
LONG LAKE
R
HARO
C RD
BR O
" c “M= J "
"
FRON
RIDGELAND RD
LN
NE BU R
ARDEN RD
"
BRADLEY RD
A ZE
D
BULL LAKE RD
SWAMP RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE L R IL
T LN SPOR
LN
G TR
PIT
ER
PH CLARK
N
RD
LIN E
BELL
RIM BERT
ND
EL
RD
DIN
B OE
PRICE RD
AM TH
WIN
E RD HORSESHOE LAKE DR BAY BIG
R LN
DAWSON RD
TH U
U SO
RRY LAK
R BA
RR IVE
D
BUCK LAKE RD COX
BULL LAKE
LN
BIG CLEAR LAKE C P LN
ARDEN
NR
ON LN
"
WILLETT
“J
" " “>
RO
JORD
PARKS RD
RD ER HAU CRANBE OM
E RD
ND
CK RD
ELM TRE
GE
ELM TREE
EEK LN
LR
TR TEALGARRISON LAKE
WALLBRIDGE LAKE
S RD HAYE
KED CR
SALMON RIVER
SE
N
CROO
KENNEBEC LAKE RI E HERON
L FA
YL KA
" G LN
WARRENS LAKE
WILKES LN
"
BLU
"
LE BAKER VALLEY RD
RD
TOWN LINE RD
DSON
BOLTON LAKES
IS
RY NG HU
RICH AR
MENT RD
BA YR
D
MINK LAKE
G RD
BURKE SETTLE
HUNGRY LAKE
ON ARMSTR
RD
" "
HENDERSON
RD
OW N
BORDENW OOD RD
UR
LN AY SB ALF UNKN
BU
RD VE L
EY
GU LL
RD
WILLIS
KI
VE
RTSV ILLE RD
ROBERTSVILLE
ROAD 509
LN
BIG
KO RK
SHINER RD
Y
" >
" "
DR
TL
N
MISSISSIPPI STATION
CROTCH LAKE
N LN "
LE
ROBE
S SHORE
SO AR C D YR LLE
YR
IT
RD
IL
OLD
HE
LN
BELL
BIG GULL LAKE
"
"
HENDERSON RD
WEDLO
D R
HR OC AR D
GU
BR O
U
Y LN LINDE
"
RD
RD GREER M LN FAR
EM
"
MILLERS LAKE
LEMKE LN COXVILLE
RD GULL LAKE LN
GULL LAKE " HARLOWE
"
" “>
SNOW ROAD STATION
QUEBEC LAKE
HARLOWE RD
KINGS LAKE
"
D
ER
FO
Q
HIT ES
CROTCH LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
E LN
PINE LAKE
RD
WINTERGREEN RD
BO
PE T
WIL
LN
IDA HIL
S LN
TOWE
AN
W
ARDOCH LAKE
"
"
ID
KE S
S KASH LAKE LN
E LAK
DONALDSON MORROW RD
"
LS
SPA
AUSTRIS RD LA
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
ST
LN
ANTOINE LAKE
M IL
KIN
D
G
OTTO
LN
R LN
SMITH RD
MA R
TR
MCVEIGH LN
LN
CANNON TL
AR ST T ES
RD
SH
R LN MANO WATK INS LN MALCOLM LAKE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
TH
SAGER LN
K” MA > KA "
WA SH " KA >
TR
E OAK RD CAV RS MYE
RD 3
U SO
MINKTRACK LAKE
BU
S
MUD LAKE RD
"
ARDOCH
D
"
BROWNS BAY LN
"
R RIVE
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
VAN S LA
"
RA
LN LS M IL
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
HR
N
RD
"
"
R FO
"
SUNDAY LAKE
OC
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
LN
NG
RD
PIN
HWY 41
RD HTS HEIG ZINAW S MA
RD
ADAM
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
RD 506
HEAD RD
E LAKE
SKOOTAMAT TA LAKE RD
STRUTH
SWAMP LAKE
LAKE LN
FERNLEIGH
" MARBLE LAKE
MYERS CAVE
OMPAH
D AR
NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
" J " c "
ADDINGTON
ES
C
O NT
“=
“> " “> J " >
"
RD
O AN
ER RD
9
SHABOMEKA LAKE RD
"
CLOYNE
KE
RD
; " " )
NORTH RD
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
"
LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
" RD
ER
PALMERSTON LAKE
RD 50
SAND LAKE HR AC BE
SHABOMEKA LAKE LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
ID SN
LA
“D
BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
MARBL
"
JAM
" PLEVNA
" " J “>
" c
RD
LAKE
E
A LN
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
SAND
QU
SPRO
"
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
LS
MO S
D
LAKE RD
HIL KLIM
ER
LAK
FOLG
"
CANONTO
CANONTO LAKE
ER U YO
"
KISHKEBUS LAKE
RD
CRUISE RD
"
MOSQUE LAKE
41
OL
GRINDSTONE LAKE
E BAY RD
$ +
C AR
SUMMIT LAKE
"
LL
FAWN LAKE
BRASH LN
RD
MO U
KE LA
BIG LAKE
RD
NTA
E
"
"
M
"
BA Y
RD
UL
V
N
BR
O
TO ER
HA
FFIE LN
LUCKY LAKE
K
BRULE LAKE
EE N
D
N
NR
SCHOON
OW
"
GOVAN LAKE
HA AT
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
BR
SS
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
RU
NORCAN LAKE
HE
SKEAD LAKE
TRAPPER LAKE
RN RD
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
RIVER STYX
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
(outside Frontenac County)
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
;
" )
Emergency Service
CITY OF KINGSTON
Library Municipal School
"
Other Key Destinations
"
Railways
TOWN OF GANANOQUE
BYRNE POINT
Abandoned Railway
"
LN
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
LINE
RD
19TH
R LN
LINE
RD
LE MIL
18TH
RD
Y LN IS BA
LINE
LEW
"
IE LN
LINE
ALAR
MCDONALD LN
T RD
JOSLIN’S LN
LL
POIN
17TH
IDAY
16TH
RD
ER
IC
A
R’S
RD POINT
CA NA ST DA AT ES O F A M ED IT N U
3RD LINE RD
RD
2ND LINE RD
OLL RD
RD
LN
LINE
"
RD
$ +
SON
LINE
EN TE
RD
BUTTON_BAY
EN STEV
BIG SANDY BAY
ETT
"
"
13TH
ND RD
12TH
BENN
BA Y
KIE HOLL
BAYFIELD BAY
RD
CARP
BU TT ON
City of Kingston International Boundary
Y RD ‘S BA
HOWE ISLAND
NE
LA HIGH
RD
E RD
LI 9TH
Y LN
RD
S EA
LINE
E RD
County of Frontenac Townships
E RIDG
E RD
95 WAY HIGH
LIN 4TH
REEDS BAY
REED
OR H SH SOUT
ER RD WILM
E RD
95
E RD
$ +
Wetland LAKE ONTARIO
LIN 7TH
RD
96 WAY HIGH
"
LIN 8TH
"
E RD
LINE
10TH
MARYSVILLE
96
LIN 11TH
$ +
E RD
"
BASE
Waterbody
" > " ;c " "
) " J “> "
"
" c "
= R
BOAT CHANNEL
T RD
D
7051
SIMCOE ISLAND
Crown Land
POIN
LIN 5TH
Provincial Park
PRINCE EDWARD BAY
MILE
E MM
NINE
Hamlet
GD
R ON
RD
SU
LAN
TE R
R RD FULLE
WIN
LIN 9TH
RY
AMHERST ISLAND
Other
Parcel Property
RY
R FE
Local Road
FE R
" ; " J )
NE RD
E RD
E IS LF
Major Road
RD
BASELI
R SID LOWE
WO
Highway
LF E IS
DR ISLAND
WO
RE RD
HOW E
SHO "
NORTH
HEAD SPIT
Road Network
DRISC
Unknown Status of Railway
BATEAU CHANNEL
"
NORTH CHANNEL
WOLFE ISLAND
0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
Trails Concept Plan
Page 51 of 149
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC
BLACK DONALD LAKE
September 2014
VICTO
OMPAH
HU
N
A TC
M
RY LN
N PL
JUNIPER LAKE DODGE LAKE TY MIS
"
J "
"
MATAWATCHAN RD
Y
"
WY
HE
RO
N
W
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
SKEAD LAKE
"
TRAPPER LAKE
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE NORCAN LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
GOVAN LAKE
MACKIE LAKE
CLOYNE
CAMP LAKE
"
MAIR LAKE
BRULE LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE RUSS BROWN
RD
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE
H SC
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
ROUNDCAMP LAKE LN
RR
HY
LN
DR
O
D
OR
SE
LN
REDHORSE LAKE
IN R NTA
N TO ER
DH
E
D
HA
FF IE
RE
K LA
RD
MO U
OV
NE
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
OO
BUCKSH OT LAKE RD
LUCKY LAKE
BIG LAKE
RD M
E
LA
KE
PE T
SPROULE LN
VAN S LA
T RD
RD ILB
UR
SH RD
W
S BU
LN
TL E
LA
HALL
KE
LN
LN
R
VE SIL
LN
AK HW
AK AM
LA
K
IN RM
WATKI
NS LN
AU S T KIN
SPA
CH
UT
ES
RD
RIS LA
LN
ARDOCH LAKE
RD KE S
CROTCH LAKE KINGS LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
IDE
LN
GE
SAGER LN
ON
WH
EE
LL
S JE
N
SIE
A TR NQ
D
UIL Y LN
BL AC
IT
R
C
W
Y
AR
SO
N
NT LN
LL
LA K
EL
N
BIG GULL LAKE S FO
RK LN
R FA
M
LN
L BE
CH
AM
W
LN
10
EER
CROTCH LAKE
RD R MA
DR
W
DR
SL NE JO N NL
BELL LN CO
S SH
VIE
SH
OR E
L
COXVILLE HE N
L
L EN
N
A EM
DR
ROBE
RTSV ILLE
RD
ROBERTSVILLE
VE L
EY
RD
HARLOWE
D
GR BE R
LN AY LID HO RD GE LOD
HENDERSON RD
GU
OL
M
RD
MISSISSIPPI STATION
SHINER RD
QUEBEC LAKE EY LN LIND
D
TL
GULLEY
CHIMNEY POI
SR
MILLERS LAKE
D ER
K
ILL MM
SNOW ROAD STATION
WA G
NU
GULL LAKE RD
LN
MALCOLM LAKE
SMITH RD MA R
WHITES RD
WINTERGREEN RD
GE
RIDGE LN
MANOR LN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
TTA
ED
GUTHEINZ RD
SOUTH RD
CO
GG
M IL
MARS
TU
TL
RA
LS FORE ST LN
RD S CAVE
ER
W RD
RD
MYER
KE
S KASH LAKE LN
N EL
MORRO
ARDOCH
S KA
HARLOWE RD
LA
PINE LAKE TO W
RD DELYEA
M
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
N
RD
LN
PL
R FA
BROWNS BAY LN
D
AM SW
ER
ARDOCH
MINKTRACK LAKELYONS GATE LN
LN
SNOW LN
LN
RD
RD 506
SR
LE MAP
DONALDSON RD
DONALDSON
ER RM
N
E
OA K
MARBLE LAKE RD
WELLMAN RD
SWAUGERS LAKE
MYERS CAVE MYERS CAVE
OAK RD
RD 3
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
RIV
LAKE LN
TWIN
R
SL
N
LN
H HIG
K OC
EL
GP IN
LN
C
AR ST
O
PIN
FL A
FLIELER LN
IN TW
N
R
LN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
ADDINGTON
RD
HE
W OTTO
LN
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
KY
City of Kingston
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
SUNDAY LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
FERNLEIGH
MARBLE LAKE
RD
NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
HEAD RD
ADAM
SWAMP LAKE LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
RY
LAKE RD
RD
ER
SKOOTAMATTA
E AK
NB
RD
AL
Parcel Property
International Boundary
RD
MUD LAKE
MO
ER
Wetland
County of Frontenac Townships
O NT
ANTOINE LAKE
STRUTH
L SA
ID SN
K ME
CLOYNE
Waterbody
NO
PLEVNA
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
HIGGINS LN
Hamlet
Crown Land
LAKE RD
LA
ND SAND LAKE RD
RD HTS HEIG
S MAZ INAW ADDINGTON RD 4
LEVERE RD
SPENCER
Other
LAKE LN
N
Local Road
SHAWENEGOG
YL BA
Major Road
JAM
OMPAH
RD 509
CA
H RD NORT
SHABOMEKA LAKE
ER YD SN
O AB SH
Abandoned Railway
Highway
PALMERSTON LAKE RD
D
SAND LAKE D HR AC BE
LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
Road Network
KE
AgendaItem#6•
41
Municipal
Provincial Park
RD BUCKSHOT LAKE
KISHKEBUS LAKE BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
Key Community Desinations
Unknown Status of Railway
LA
R
41
Railways
E
KRINGS LN
$ +
School
QU
D
(outside Frontenac County)
Other Key Destinations
MO S
KE
Existing Off-Road Route
R ES
LN
LA
D
(outside Frontenac County)
Emergency Service
LN
AY
ER
KLIMA LN
Existing Off-Road Route
Library
ES
D
LA K
D
N
LS
NG
RR
SU
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
HWY
Page 52 of 149
HIL
U YO
MOSQUE LAKE
GE
CRUISE RD
N TO
LN
DS
L FO
CANONTO
IN G
IN
RD
Legend Existing Conditions
= J 9 c
PA YN
ER
SL
N
O
CANONTO LAKE
RD BA Y E
GR
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail
LN
CH
C AR
GRINDSTONE LAKE
D LR
N
SUMMIT LAKE
LL
RD
FAWN LAKE
LY AL
N
KE LA
BUCKSHOT LAKE
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
NS
AT HA
SH
" J " > c "
SO
LE
OR
E
U BR
RD
R PA
WOLFE LAKE
SHORTS RD
AR D O
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC
0 CH
RD
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
SHARBOT LAKE "
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC
HWY 41
$ + 41
September 2014 "
" c AR DOCH
KIR
K
9
S ALF
YL BA
N
MACDONNELL RD BURKE SETTL
BA YR
509 AD RO
ELIJ FANNING LN
RD
RD MCLEAN RD
ON MP S TH O
MIDDLE RD
RO
Y
BE
NN
LN
SMITH RD
TRYON RD
YW LL
E RD
ARDEN
ROCK LAK
S RD CROS
D SHARBOT LAKE SHARBOT LAKE
RD
ROCK LAKE
OO
D
"
"
LN
" J
"
SUCKER LAKE
EAGLE LAKE MINN
IES LN
RD
EAGLE LAKE
WELLY
GOOD RD
WA G
AR VIL
LE
RAYMO RD
(outside Frontenac County)
Emergency Service
SU G
AR BU
RD
PARHAM
SH R
D
SOUTH SHORE LN
EAGL
Key Community Desinations
Library
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY ARMSTRONG
AgendaItem#6•
Rideau Heritage Trails
SILVER LAKE
BRASH LN
NK
R
CROW LAKE RD
RD
PIT
E
N
LONG LAKE
CRO
ER
LEGGAT LAKE
DUCHARME RD
RD IN YOUNG
(outside Frontenac County)
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Rideau Heritage Trails
N
HO
AK
DL
AG W
ST. GEORGE LAKE
L AT
Existing Off-Road Route
C
HM ON
BENDER RD
GG
TICHBORNE
FIFTH DEPOT LAKE DUNCAN LAKE
NL
N
N
OC
D
YORK
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES
KR
HIC KS
ELBOW LAKE
EE
E LN
Other Key Destinations
LE A
NL
RD
RO
CR
HE
H FIS
RD
NC
School
KE LA
RA
TH FIF
A BE
Municipal
SO
PH
UD
IL
AN
ECHO LAKE
LIP
T
Railways
S
LN
LN
Abandoned Railway
Other
CHIPPEGO LAKE BREEN LN
SPARKS LN
LN LEE
ROAD 38
E RD
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
ST. ANDREW LAKES
EC HO LAK
KE RD
YE
R
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
FOUR TH LA
Local Road
LN
Highway Major Road
BALL RD
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
Unknown Status of Railway
Road Network
DW
ST. ANDREW LAKES
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
MOORE RD RD CLOW
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
GOODFEL LOW
D
T RD
LN
AR EN
A BDRY
RD
GO
PICCADILLY
RD NORTH
RD
CR
AIG
HOWES LAKE
RD
ROOKE
GODFREY
Y RE DF
HINCHINB
M O
O
N
R
MIL TO N
FORTY FOO
RD
HA
City of Kingston International Boundary
LN
COLE LAKE
ATS RD
SECOND
County of Frontenac Townships
LAKE RD
Wetland
OAK FL
GILES
BR OW
NS RD
Waterbody
Parcel Property
ERS RD
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
STRUTH
Crown Land
ON RD
DWYER RD
Hamlet Provincial Park
WILKINS
Page 53 of 149
Existing Off-Road Route
B STU
LN
BREW ER RD
CLEMENT RD
LE
RIC
K RE E
"
CROW LAKE ELG
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
ELBOW LAKE D ER IGU GU
D
LN
BABCOCK RD
(outside Frontenac County)
LS RD
ORIEL
Existing Conditions
= J 9 c
$ +
LN
O’REILLY LAKE LN LY LAKE
LONG LAKE RD
N
AN
N
LN
RD
RV E
LN
CR
DE
LN
RD
NALD
G
LE Y
MCDO
SHARBOT LAKE
RD ON NN CA T S T SHARBOT LAKE ET RR A G
SHARBOT LAKE NC
A TEN
GT R
BOBBY RD
CARNAHAN LAKE
E
HA
LN
FOX RD
Legend
DU
RD
ER
SE E
DIN
D
IN
D
ON
BASS LAKE
NEAD OW
ND
SS R
NE
FE
D
DR
WIN
N LA
RD
7
SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK PIR
RIM LN BERT
RD
HORSESHOE LAKE R D CRANBERRY LAKE RD R TO AS
A ZE
W
D
RD
KR
BASS LAKE RD ON RD RGUS
N FRO
ER
M
C BR O
EM
D
R AM TH
AU
MOUNTAIN GROVE ILL R
U SO
MH
BLACK LAKE
DAWSON RD
RD
GARDINERS RD O BO
EB
BRADLEY RD
LN
TH U
BULL LAKE LAKE
O PH
LN
N EL
AC C E
WHITE LAKE HAROLD RD
CLARK RD
K RD
BU LL
EN
P
D
ELM TREE
WEDLOC
AG C
COX RD
BUCK LAKE
ON LN
STON RD
ARDENRBIG CLEAR LAKE
NR
JORD
HA RD
SH IB
HES
RD
LN
SWAMP RD
E LAKE
O CK
JOHN
O DC
PRICE RD RIDGELAND RD
WO
WILLETT
ARDEN RD
BLU E
EE RD
RO
S RD HAYE
E RD
ER RD
TG WALLBRIDGE LAKE AT E RD
T LN SPOR
BELL LIN
FALL RIV
ES
ND
7 AY HW
TR ELM GE
HIG
W
RD
LOST LN
BER R
YR
D
GARRISON LAKE TEAL TR
HUG
Y KA
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
NORTH
LN
WARRENS LAKE
RD
KENNEBEC LAKE BLUE HERON RI
KED
K CREE
RD
IS W LE
N NL
CROO
SALMON RIVER
LN
BO LT O
BEBRIS RD
AH
RD
RY NG HU
EY RD Y VALL ER W TURN
TOWN LINE RD
R BAKE
D
D
YR
NR
NB O
DS O
CO
H AR
; " )
" J " c "”
“>
EMENT RD
BOLTON LAKES
KINGSTON LINE RD
MCVEIGH LN
MINK LAKE
TAMAR ACK TR
RIC
"
HUNGRY LAKE
D
HENDERSON
" c " c
CLARENDON RD N RD
GAYLORD RD
UNKNOW
BORDENWOOD RD
RD
LN
VE
R
KO
GU LL RD
50
BIG
HENDERSON RD
D
SHORTS RD
POLAR BEAR LN
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
E BE
KS
±
LN
0
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
N
RID
GE
LN
CROW LAKE
O
DE
LN
W
D
ET S
S HO EAS T
PO ST
RT
EL
TSP PO
N
RD
N OO
LEE RD
GE RD
BR ES
LN N EG A
WE
NG
WOLFE LAKE
D
MUL VILL
RD
RD
FITZGERALD
THIRTY ISLAND LAKE YO U
RD
LN
Y IR
ER LAK
AH IAW
DA
LN
AH W IA
LFE
L
E AK
RD
ZIMMERMAN LN
POPLAR LN NEW
E HIT
RD
MCNE LL RD
BARR LN TIM S LN
BYCROFT LN
W
ALL
WO
BOBS LAKE
FIREH
BURRID
LN
GARRET T RD
LN
BURRIDGE LAKE GREE N BA Y RD
RE
AM BE
WOLFE LAKE
HILLCT LN
SU N S
BU CK BA Y RD
Y
N SU
S LN
LN
RD
H OR
ES
BR IGG CE SPA
BOBS LAKE
BELKNAP LN
LN
TR WIT
KE
W LN
N
DE
HIC
PO
L ITT
HANNA
S
BURNS RD
LN
VE LN
RN BU
BOBS LAKE
HICKEY RD
EY LN
EE RD
S RE
GRO
RAINBO
TERESA LN
IN
T STEELE RD
HO
LAKE
LACK
LN
LN
LN
N
BOBS LAKE
EN
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC
RL
LN
NS
ES
MAP LE
EYE
OU
PIN
BOBS
W
W
LL WA
HARROWSMITH
MIC
RD NO RSON
O BR
AN DE
AW RD
RD
BR AD SH
VERONA
A
RTH
MUD BAY
D BA
RD
LN
UR
September 2014
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
ALDER LN
SA N
DP IT L
NE
BRASH LN
LO
D BA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
E MC
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 4 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
E RD
CENTREVILL
E RD
LN POTSPOON LAKE
TOBI N RD
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS HENRY LN
I LN
CANOE LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES
LA
KE
LN
L PO
JAMES WILSO PE
LN
LN
LN
H MIS CO MA C
LN
Y
D
S PO
TO
IC FF
E
TE GA
LN
HART LAKE
CROW LAKE
RD LN
KE LA
BR A D
DE N
G
HIDEAWAY
ST AF
FO
DON MO
UR
ORE LN
A
CA R
RYIN
LAC
ER
D
RID
H LN
GP
E
BEAC
DOG LAKE LA
LN
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
WES
OR M SBEE RD TVIE W LN
CRANBERRY LAKE RID
GE
LN
DIN
CA
AL LN
NA
LL
RN RD
D RD
DOG LAKE
EVEL
RD
A RD
ILLS
CA R
ABERNA THY RD
SU NBUR Y RD
WASHBU
NT H
LN
SONN
RD
LN
D
N
IDA HI LL RD
CESS
S
RD
S RD
ST
LN
S RD
H
CH
R AU
LN
SAND
GT ON
BU R A TB UN
RD
BEAC
H NU
T RD
MCG ARVE Y
RD
PR IN
BATT ERSE
LD
COLLINS LAKE
BA S
ID
LLIN
BATTERSEA
LAKE RD
SUNBURY
RD
LN
RE
WE
FACT ORY
ARTH
BUCK POINT LN
DR
MP AR TS
RAM PART
N
RN RD
LAKE
C
NL
UND
M EX AL
A LE
TRAVERSE LAKE
HORSESHOE LAKE RIS
LN
RA
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
LN
INVERARY LAKE
INVERARY
ON RD
ES RD
RD
LN
LOW
RD DUFF
ROUND
RD BOYS
DE
OLD
DR ER C
RE
EK
RD
LN
RIS TM
CH
T
Y LE
RD
N HT SL
NR
HA R
RD
MAPL
LATI MER
DAVI DS
BAY
ON
ICO
RD
EN KO
LN
RD
KN IG
LE
VA L ER DE
PO
IN
T
LN
ROOST LN
BU
HIN FIS
MILBU
R
N
PER
ND
RD
N
TH OR
O SH
D ER
O
CITY OF KINGSTON
R AIL
OPINICON LAKE
D
RD
IX
HA R
ITH
-D
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
IT SPL
LOWER ROCK LAKE
ND
HOLM
International Boundary
YR RA
L VA
H RD
GREENF IELD RD
E LN
R
LIV
ER RO
RD
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
RED
AR
LN
RN
N AY L KB BA C
LN S OW
WALS
LN
LN
CE D
ES IDG
GIL
UR
DALE
Y RD
NH A MR
LN
RD
LN
GA
N EE
LN
HA
SU M AC RD BU R E
E
R
T WA HIA
C
LIF
ID FS
G
OINT
RR
O
TR
LELA
EY RD
DIX
T RD
RAILTON
GA
CR
RD
D
RD
SYD E
R ES
AU SS
PERTH ROAD DEA N SM
O’NEIL
H RD
D FO
LN
D
PERT H RD
ISO N
L
SPAFFORDTON KEEL
LY
PERT H RD
RD
HOGAN
C RD MA
LEAF
T LN GAR
RD
UPPER ROCK LAKE
LE LN
IA
SA
NA
W
R ER ILM
LE MAP
PEBB
RG
SHALES RD
KE RD ER LA DRAP
IN G M NORW AY RD IL
WILM ER RD
SH EI
LA LN
RET REA T LN
WHEATLEY
ST
O GE
TT ER
R
D
BU SC H
LN
BAY SILLS
BEDF
ROSE
BENJAMIN
RD
RD ORD
RD DALE
H PO ROUG HBO
SP R
WILMER
MOR R
LN
LAM BER T RD
RAIL TON
AS
ER SM E
SE RO
LN D
ETT LN EVER
LN
BOTTING RD ANKER LN
AS M
IN OP
LA
City of Kingston
EY E
RD
SR
SYNDENHAM
LN
RE
County of Frontenac Townships
LS
R BE
O M
Parcel Property
O O AR R
D RD EFOR HOLL
RD MORI N NEW
BDRY RTLA ND
RD
SHALES LN
DRAPER LAKE
SYDENHAM LAKE
COAC
D FLO
MAN
Waterbody Wetland
STONESS LN
BU L
L BI
LN
OW
WS
TAG
E
FELL
RE
PARKER POINT LN
SEAP
BL
AR
RD
ON RD MURT
TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
LAN
EW
ND
LN
AN LN
NO
Hamlet
L RD
EAST SC AN
GORR
ST
STAG E
INN RD
RID
N RD
R D EA
E RD
TO
ES LN
ERSO
ED G
D
T QU
E
LN
JON
WES
GOULD LAKE
FREE
ALTO N
RD N
KEN
IL TO W
BR A C
NNE
N RD
RD
Other
OW SM ITH RD
LE
RD
BUCK LAKE
SYDENHAM LAKE
SYDENHAM
R
HEND
Local Road
TIN LN
RE CR
MCC O
QUIN
LE LE LN YE FR NORM
NORTH OTTER LAKE
HOLLEFORD LAKE
KNOWLTON LAKE
LOUG
D
NOTR
HARR
KE
Major Road
EST
PBEL CAM
R YA
Highway
N
NORTH SHO
LL R
D
Unknown Status of Railway
RD W
RUTL
RD
Abandoned Railway
RD
HARROWSMITH
MCLE AN R
Railways
Road Network
KL
S AK BL
38 ROAD
Other Key Destinations WAL LACE RD
ALTO N
R
A MC S
RD
RD
YE FR
LN
W
RD
OK
RD
JAMIE SON
LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
RO INB CH HIN D
RBEC
WES T
UVEN RD
MUR VALE R
OKE
VANL
ST
School
BRO
HARTINGTON
E DAME
COLE
D RD
CLEAR LAKE
BIRCH LAKE
DIT H LN
C FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE DU OD WO
ELLE
Municipal
FOR
KE RD
N
JOHN MAR
ORT H RD
WOLF E SW AMP RD
BR AD
E LA
O
MS
DA VE
RD YORK
AN L
YR
N RD Q UA R R
PETW
Emergency Service Library
Provincial Park
FFM
E RD
WAT SO
PETWORTH
BOYC
K RD
Key Community Desinations
KER
RD
R RD
GERMAN
(outside Frontenac County)
D
LN
AgendaItem#6•
RD
Rideau Heritage
PONDLILY LAKE
NAPANEE LAKE
AN
IP
N
DEVIL LAKE
LN
RD
TUNDRA LN
INT
(outside Frontenac County)
Crown Land
LN
HAMBLY LAKE
Existing Off-Road Route
= J 9 c
ROCK
SH
KINGSFORD LAKE
H PO
(outside Frontenac County)
GERMAN
Page 54 of 149
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
SILVER
RD
LAKE
NE LN
BIRC
VERONA
DEVIL ALPI
LITTLE SALMON LAKE
LY’S
ND RD
LN
LS
BIG CLEAR LAKE
WIL
NA SA
ST OR
VERO
RD
MIC
E HA
C M
CANO
D
CK
HU
ER
RO
BA NK VE RO ST Y NA DR ST
BELL
BAUD ER DR
N EL LA K MER FFY E BU
LN
VANLUVEN LAKE
Existing Conditions
LONG SWAMP
KE RD
HOW
ST FIR
Legend
DE
LA SERT
W
KE LN
DOUCET
ES LA
RD
LA
KE
RD
MILLER
RD
USE LN
TO
DESERT LAKE
LN
TE LN
RE
D
CRAIG
GRO
EEL LAKE
LZ
RD S
LN
N RD
RO LN
AN LN COTM
THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE RD OS DE Y
CREEK LN
ER
RD
RD
LD
CA
ER
YN O
EQ U LEV
SN ID
BELLROCK
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Rideau Heritage Trails
ER
BROOKS LN
CLAIR RD
Existing Off-Road Route
M IN
E
MCFA DDEN
R
LAK EFIE
O
LN
O
HOLS LNWHITE LAKE MCNIC
RON LN
M
CAME
Y
D
BUGSY
AR M
R
BEAR CR
±
EEK RD
0 RIVER STYX
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
Trails Concept Plan
±
MAP 5 - EXISTING CONDITIONS COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF FRONTENAC ISLANDS
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
September 2014
CITY OF KINGSTON
BYRNE POINT BATEAU CHANNEL
IS FERR Y
CITY OF KINGSTON
HOWE
LEAVIS SHOR
DRIS COLL
RD
RD
AD
FULL
ER SI DE RD
HOWE
HOWE ISLAND
ISLAN D
BASELIN
E RD
ER RD
LOW
E ITH SP
ES
NORTH SHORE RD
THOUSAND ISLANDS
DR
GOOD FRIEND
TP
OIN
TL
DR
N LIGHTHO
S EA
USE LN
D LN
RIB
LN
LN
C OR
C OVE
JOSLIN’S LN
PORT METCALF LN ORY HICK
NE’S
LN
RD
AgendaItem#6•
LINE
NE R
TH ABE ELIZ
RD
19TH
RD
N
LEO
LINE
RL
LANE
LINE
18TH
LE MIL
RT’S
MCFADDEN LN
LIM
NA
UG
H
NAL
GH
20TH
15TH LINE RD
HIGHWAY 95
RD
RD
LN AY
RD
LI 9TH
WOLFE ISLAND
95
KY
LOU
Y RD ‘S BA
LINE
IS B
T LN
LINE
BAYFIELD BAY
BR EA LEW
POIN
15TH
R RD
SURE
LINE
TH SH
LN 17TH
4TH LINE RD
MUR PHY’S
LN
16TH
3RD LINE RD
T RD
MCD O
RD
ST
D
Existing Off-Road Route
REED
Y RD ‘S BA KYLE
Existing Off-Road Route
KE R D
S EA
YL
N
HIGH
IC ER AM
DA
F O
NA
S
RD
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
ED
BU TT ON
K LA
Other Key Destinations
DR LAN
ETT
RD
IT
GE
BLAC
School
IN T RD
BA Y
UN
RID
Municipal
R’S PO
RD
BENN
REEDS BAY
Library
EN TE
A
LINE 8TH
RD
Key Community Desinations
CARP
CA
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail
RD
(outside Frontenac County)
ST AT E
2ND LINE RD
LN
R LN
EN’S
RD
$ +
D
POIN
ON A
IE AR AL
RD O RE
LINE 7TH
R LINE
IDAY
WY
STUA
LINE 5TH
Page 55 of 149
BASE
LN
HARBOU
WILME
(outside Frontenac County)
Emergency Service
HOLL
PLEA
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
= J 9 c
96
SOU
WOLFE ISLAND
Existing Conditions
LL
GRANDE
SCOTCH SETTLEMENT WAY HIGH
RD
RRY
Legend
KIE
LINE
IS FE
BOAT CHANNEL
AN RD
11TH
C OE
SIMCOE ISLAND
HOG
HEL
96
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
RD
$ +
SIM
SIMCOE ISLAND
ELIZA ST
MARYSVILLE
RD
RD
IN
RD
PO
LINE
AS
N’S
LINE
10TH
LU C
G ST
POIN
GOIN
ILE
LN ITE
EM
WH
NIN
N TL
T RD
12TH
O’S LN
RD
N
MILL POINT LN T RD
POIN
GA
LINE
WALD
LINE 9TH
‘S L
51
E EV
RD 70
OAK
DU
13TH
LN
LN
LINE RD
51
RD
HORE BAYS
COTTAGE
11TH
N LN
RD 70
U SO
Y JO
G FER
RD
D
$ +
BUTTON_BAY
Railways Abandoned Railway
POINT ALEXANDRIA
Unknown Status of Railway V STE
Road Network
ON EN S
LN
BIG SANDY BAY
Highway Major Road Local Road
Other Hamlet Provincial Park Crown Land Waterbody LAKE ONTARIO
Wetland Parcel Property County of Frontenac Townships City of Kingston International Boundary
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
0
1.25
2.5
5 Kilometres
AgendaItem#6•
MAP 6 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN EXISTING HIKING TRAILS
BLACK DONALD LAKE
NO RC AN
AM
LN
TC
KE
UN
LA
JUNIPER LAKE H DODGE LAKE
September 2014
P LN
YW MIST
Y
RO
N
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
ER RD
"
MACKIE LAKE
CAMP LAKE
"
" “>
"
MAIR LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE ROUNDCAMP LAKE
"
RD
REDHORSE LAKE
IN
CH
HY
DR
O LN WOLFE LAKE
BUCKSHOT LAKE
LN LY AL
S
LN ULE
RD R BU RD ES UT
CH ED GG
"
"
ARDOCH
LN
RD
CLARENDON RD
FANNING LN
RD
LN
LN T IN
PO
N
A
SL
M IC
WN
LN NS
RD HANNA
RD
LLE RD
LAKE
MULVI
RD S W RE ND MC A
LN OD WO RD HA
AS
RIS TM
CH
RD
LN
KE LA
BEAR CRE
DEN BR AD
EK RD
LN RD ST AF FO
N LL CA
IN AL
BREWER LAKE
EVEL
WASHBU
SONN
RVEY
MCGA
Existing Conditions
"
Y RD
SUNBURY
BEE RD CRANBERRY LAKE LN GE RID
DOG LAKE
CARD
" SUNBUR
J
T EC PL COLLINS LAKE MA
"
ORMS
LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE
NA
S RD
RN RD
SAND
CRANESNEST LAKE RD ILLS RD TH CE RN PLA BU ING LA RY UR CA R A LN DOG LAKE
"
"
"
" c
N RD
RAMP ARTS RD
"
BATTERSEA
HIDEAWA Y LN
RD DUFF
ROUND LAKE LAKE RD
INVERARY LAKE
RD
DIXO N
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LN AN LE MC
ROUND
RD
A RD
TH
NFIELD
"
INVERARY "
TRAVERSE LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE
LN
L RD
DAVID SO
RD
G
LN
LN
EY
EX LAKE RD AL
BATT ERSE
Y RD
N
LN T IN PO T
N
HIN FIS RD
LN EIL
GREE
"
HOLM
HT SL
ER TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
DEVIL
LN
SMITH
KOEN
"
O’N
R PE
UPPER ROCK LAKE
FISHING LAKE
" H RD c
“ES RD
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE CROW LAKE
WALS
RD
EY RD
LN
D
MILBU
RD
ISON
R AY
LL VA
RD
R RI
R LIV
ON RD
ME R
SILL
A LN
SYDE
BAY LN
CEDA
DGES
VA
NE
PERT H RD
WIL
WILMER
C RD
LN
LN
LN BA C
GR
CR
DRAP
BIL LY
KE RD
ER LA
DEAN
"
LN E ID FS IF CL LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
DALE
RD NH AM
KEEL
KN IG
HARP
LEE RD
BURRIDGE
GARRET T RD
RD
LN
NO
YO DE
SE
MIN LN
RD
D
ORD
S BA YR
BEDF RETR
H RD
MUR VALE RD
STAG E
38 ROAD RD RIDA FLO
SH EIL
RD N IL TO W
NELL
COAC
GA
GIL
LN
SU MA
BU RE
S PO
S
; " )
OPINICON LAKE LN OPINICON LAKE TE GA E IC FF HART LAKE TO
HINGE LAKE
"
"
PERTH ROAD
N RD HOGA SYDENHAM LAKE
SPAFFORDTON
“RAILTON
FORE ST RD
N RD
C MA
OPINIC
ERNIE LN
RD
LN
S BA
MURTO
RAILT ON
SA
LN ART
RD
BUCK LAKE
E LN
"
RD
INDIAN LAKE NORW AY RD
RD BAY
MORR
S MA
A
RD
"
" c " c RD > " " BELL “=
CAMP
"
TAGG
G AU SS
BB
MCC ON
ST
; " ) J” “>
RUTLSYDENHAM ED GE RD
R BE
NOBL
GORR
RO
D RD EFOR HOLL
RD EA
NOTR
MCLE AN RD
ALTO N
RD
"
"
RO
RD
EEL MAN RD
ST
“HARROWSMITH " > c " HA “>
RROW " c SMITH
SHALES LN DRAPER LAKE
DARLING LAKE CRONK LAKE BU LL SE YE LN
RD
"
RD
ER
"
"
KNOWLTON LAKE
EAT LN
ST E DAME
ESON
RD WE
TO
GOULD LAKE
FREE ALTO N
SLIDE LAKE
EL
WIL
OK
HIN
RD
QUAR
K RD
RD
RBEC ELLE
SWAM P
JAMI
UVEN RD
"
ND
YARK
E RD
VANL
R
LN
LN
"
LA
WOLFE
"
" " J “=
HARTINGTON
LE
D
N
S
RD
LE
RD
S AK BL
AN
TO
EW
POLLYWOG LAKE
FRYE
LABELLE LAKE N L YE FR
RD
AC E
SDAL
BIG CLEAR LAKE
BUCK LAKE
ALES
EST
E RD
"
N LN
"
SOUTH OTTER LAKE N "
DOE LAKE
JOHN MART IN LN
IP
CLEAR LAKE RD LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
SH
RD W
KE RD
BOYC
C M
LITTLE SALMON LAKE FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
MASO
"
SH E LN
KINGSFORD LAKE
NORTH OTTER LAKE
LS LN
MAN RD FORD
ORTH RD
TUNDRA LN
HOLLEFORD LAKE
MABE
RD GER
RY
TROU
CHRISTIE LAKE
"
ALPIN
LN GROUSE
BIRCH LAKE
"
LN FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE
RD
DEVIL LAKE
"
MA N LN
LY’S
LN
HAMBLY LAKE
E
RD S
WIL
CH
GERMAN
PETW
PETWORTH
EEL LAKE
ARTH
BL M HA
"
ES
LN
" “= c "
"
VERONA LAKE "
LN Y
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES TOBIN
CANOE LAKE LN TROUT LN KE LA ER MINER LAKE
EY THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LN ABRA MS LN DESERT LAKE
D
YORK
LONG
ND RD
VERONA
"
RD
R
OLD MINE LN
ER
NA SA
VE BAN RO K S NA T ST
VERO
E RD HU FF
RO
RD
RD
SW AM
CK
T LAK
TT
VANLUVEN LAKE
RO
"
Legend
M O
BAUD ER DR
HOWES LAKE
RD
DESER
PONDLILY LAKE NAPANEE LAKE
WALL
LN
KS
RE
MILLER
"
E LA
RD
E BE
EV E
"
RD
"
LN AH IAW WOLFE LAKE
“LONG POND LAKE
RD
KE R
HILL RD
Y FR E
RD
INB
BELL
BROO
JAM
D
PICCADILLY RAIG C
"
"
POND LILY LAKE
IN M
RD
SON
BENJA
RD
KE
NEW
WOLFE LAKE
SANGSTER LAKE
W IL
LATIM ER RD
QUE
"
O
ARENA BDRY RD
RD
G
ER
BURRIDGE LAKE BAY RD
N LN POTSPOON LAKE GARTER LAKE
POLI LN
MCNICHOLS LN THIRTY ISLAND LAKE
GODFREY
"
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
T LA
BELLROCK P RD
FORTY FOOT RD
RD CLOW
RD BR O
WNS
LAKE RD SECOND LEVE
SN ID CARD LN
FIRS
BR AD
BUCK BAY
KE RD FOUR TH LA
SON RD WILKIN D R E R O O M Y M AR
D
POO
BRIGGS LN T LN
EN
RD
LN
R
RD RT PO ST HENRY LN
GRE
N BOBS LAKE
KE
ES
N
N
L
M OW LN EA NB SU
POTS
WE
LACKE Y LN
LA LFE
GIL
O
RAINB
"
COLE LAKE
OAK FLA TS RD
O M
YL
N
WO
ST. ANDREW LAKES
MOORE RD
KE
RL
LN
T WIT
" HILLC
LN BOBS LAKE RR BA LN TIMS RD KE LA E HIT BYCROFT LN W WHITE LAKE
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
CLAIR RD
COLE
HIC
RD
LN
LN
OU
NAP LN
T
"
S
RD LL BA ST. ANDREW LAKES
CHIPPEGO LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
BOBS LAKE GR RIDERS EE LN NB AY RD
RD
DE
BURNS RD
N LN
LEA
OC
EEK
D BA
BELK
AN
LIP
FISH CR
"
RD
RD
UD
IL
"
"
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
"
BOBS LAKE
R LN
T IT
YORK
SO
ELBOW LAKE PH
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
ALDE
W
BOBS
TICHBORNE
"
" DUNCAN LAKE
"
G
DE
RD
E RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARKFIFTH DEPOT LAKE RD KE LA TH FIF
SPARKS LN
RID
BOBS LAKE
BU R
"
J " > “c
“> PARHAM "
RAYMO
RSON
NEADOW LN
RD AN DE
RVILL
RD NO
K RD
WAGA
NE
E LN
RD
EAGLE LAKE
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
LO
CROW LAKE
S LN
GOOD RD
ECHO LAKE EC HO LAKE RD
D
HA
ALF
INT
N LN
D RD
O PO
ERSO PATT
R
" OPEONG
SUCKER LAKE
"
CROW LAKE
D
BE
W
"
CA
Y
ROCK LAKE
RD
RO
E
LN
D OO
ME R
N
LIN
SHARBOT LAKE
H CROW LAKE RD
"
LN
NG
D
RD
DL
" OLLY
ST. GEORGE LAKE LEGGAT LAKE
NN
R
BENDER RD
DUCHARME RD
LONG LAKE MINNIE
CRON
ER
RTH
LN
N
UR
MCLEAN RD
K EE
AG W
RO
O
CR
B
"
ST M AR
ELBOW LAKE RD UE GUIG
CROSS RD
D
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
LE
NR
IN
SH IB
YO TR
RD
$ +
D BA
U ST
HM ON
ON
N O’REILLY LAKE LN
SON RD
BABCOCK RD
RIC
LS
N LN
RD
D
R “D ON “c NN > ; " ) " J c " "
“>
STEELE
LN
ER RD
HA
SILVER LAKE
CA
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
CA
RD
EE RD
BR EW
"
c
SHARBOT LAKE
NE
D
Y LAKE ORIELL
LN
FOX RD
N
BLACK LAKE SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EM PIR E LN
BOBBY RD
NALD
HIGHWAY 7 "
W
TENA
AK ER
THOMP
RV E
WHITE LAKE
RD
ND
7
LAKE RD
CARNAHAN LAKE MCDO
DE
SL
LA
BR ES
RD W
D LN WES
NORTH
T EN
RD
LN
LD
BA S
BASS LAKE DUN
LOUDEN LN
RD
RD
CK
D
LONG LAKE
R
HARO
C RD
BR O
" c “M= J "
"
FRON
RIDGELAND RD
LN
NE BU R
ARDEN RD
"
BRADLEY RD
A ZE
D
BULL LAKE RD
SWAMP RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE L R IL
T LN SPOR
LN
G TR
PIT
ER
PH CLARK
N
RD
LIN E
BELL
RIM BERT
ND
EL
RD
DIN
B OE
PRICE RD
AM TH
WIN
E RD HORSESHOE LAKE DR BAY BIG
R LN
DAWSON RD
TH U
U SO
RRY LAK
R BA
RR IVE
D
BUCK LAKE RD COX
BULL LAKE
LN
BIG CLEAR LAKE C P LN
ARDEN
NR
ON LN
"
WILLETT
“J
" " “>
RO
JORD
PARKS RD
RD ER HAU CRANBE OM
E RD
ND
CK RD
ELM TRE
GE
ELM TREE
EEK LN
LR
TR TEALGARRISON LAKE
WALLBRIDGE LAKE
S RD HAYE
KED CR
SALMON RIVER
SE
N
CROO
KENNEBEC LAKE RI E HERON
L FA
YL KA
" G LN
WARRENS LAKE
WILKES LN
"
BLU
"
LE BAKER VALLEY RD
RD
TOWN LINE RD
DSON
BOLTON LAKES
IS
RY NG HU
RICH AR
MENT RD
BA YR
D
MINK LAKE
G RD
BURKE SETTLE
HUNGRY LAKE
ON ARMSTR
RD
" "
HENDERSON
RD
OW N
BORDENW OOD RD
UR
LN AY SB ALF UNKN
BU
RD VE L
EY
GU LL
RD
WILLIS
KI
VE
RTSV ILLE RD
ROBERTSVILLE
ROAD 509
LN
BIG
KO RK
SHINER RD
Y
" >
" "
DR
TL
N
MISSISSIPPI STATION
CROTCH LAKE
N LN "
LE
ROBE
S SHORE
SO AR C D YR LLE
YR
IT
RD
IL
OLD
HE
LN
BELL
BIG GULL LAKE
"
"
HENDERSON RD
WEDLO
D R
HR OC AR D
GU
BR O
U
Y LN LINDE
"
RD
RD GREER M LN FAR
EM
"
MILLERS LAKE
LEMKE LN COXVILLE
RD GULL LAKE LN
GULL LAKE " HARLOWE
"
" “>
SNOW ROAD STATION
QUEBEC LAKE
HARLOWE RD
KINGS LAKE
"
D
ER
FO
Q
HIT ES
CROTCH LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
E LN
PINE LAKE
RD
WINTERGREEN RD
BO
PE T
WIL
LN
IDA HIL
S LN
TOWE
AN
W
ARDOCH LAKE
"
"
ID
KE S
S KASH LAKE LN
E LAK
DONALDSON MORROW RD
"
LS
SPA
AUSTRIS RD LA
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
ST
LN
ANTOINE LAKE
M IL
KIN
D
G
OTTO
LN
R LN
SMITH RD
MA R
TR
MCVEIGH LN
LN
CANNON TL
AR ST T ES
RD
SH
R LN MANO WATK INS LN MALCOLM LAKE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
TH
SAGER LN
K” MA > KA "
WA SH " KA >
TR
E OAK RD CAV RS MYE
RD 3
U SO
MINKTRACK LAKE
BU
S
MUD LAKE RD
"
ARDOCH
D
"
BROWNS BAY LN
"
R RIVE
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
VAN S LA
"
RA
LN LS M IL
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
HR
N
RD
"
"
R FO
"
SUNDAY LAKE
OC
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
LN
NG
RD
PIN
HWY 41
RD HTS HEIG ZINAW S MA
RD
ADAM
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
RD 506
HEAD RD
E LAKE
SKOOTAMAT TA LAKE RD
STRUTH
SWAMP LAKE
LAKE LN
FERNLEIGH
" MARBLE LAKE
MYERS CAVE
OMPAH
D AR
NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
" J " c "
ADDINGTON
ES
C
O NT
“=
“> " “> J " >
"
RD
O AN
ER RD
9
SHABOMEKA LAKE RD
"
CLOYNE
KE
RD
; " " )
NORTH RD
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
"
LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
" RD
ER
PALMERSTON LAKE
RD 50
SAND LAKE HR AC BE
SHABOMEKA LAKE LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
ID SN
LA
“D
BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
MARBL
"
JAM
" PLEVNA
" " J “>
" c
RD
LAKE
E
A LN
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
SAND
QU
SPRO
"
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
LS
MO S
D
LAKE RD
HIL KLIM
ER
LAK
FOLG
"
CANONTO
CANONTO LAKE
ER U YO
"
KISHKEBUS LAKE
RD
CRUISE RD
"
MOSQUE LAKE
41
OL
GRINDSTONE LAKE
E BAY RD
$ +
C AR
SUMMIT LAKE
"
LL
FAWN LAKE
BRASH LN
RD
MO U
KE LA
BIG LAKE
RD
NTA
E
"
"
M
"
BA Y
RD
UL
V
N
BR
O
TO ER
HA
FFIE LN
LUCKY LAKE
K
BRULE LAKE
EE N
D
N
NR
SCHOON
OW
"
GOVAN LAKE
HA AT
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
BR
SS
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
RU
NORCAN LAKE
HE
SKEAD LAKE
TRAPPER LAKE
RN RD
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
RIVER STYX
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
Existing Hiking Trails
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
;
" )
Emergency Service
CITY OF KINGSTON
Library Municipal School
"
Other Key Destinations
"
Railways
TOWN OF GANANOQUE
BYRNE POINT
Abandoned Railway
"
LL
LN
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
T RD
RD
LINE
RD
19TH
R LN
LINE
RD
LE MIL
18TH
LINE
Y LN IS BA
LINE
LEW
"
IE LN
16TH
ALAR
MCDONALD LN
POIN
17TH
IDAY
JOSLIN’S LN
RD
RD
R’S
A
"
IC
EN TE
RD POINT
IT
ED
CA NA ST AT DA ES O F A M
ER
RD
UN
3RD LINE RD
RD
2ND LINE RD
OLL RD
R RD FULLE
LINE
LN
LINE
SON
ETT
"
"
13TH
RD
$ +
BUTTON_BAY
EN STEV
12TH
BENN
BA Y
KIE HOLL
BAYFIELD BAY
RD
CARP
BU TT ON
ND RD
BIG SANDY BAY
Y RD ‘S BA
THOUSAND ISLANDS
NE
LA HIGH
RD
E RD
LI 9TH
Y LN
RD
S EA
LINE
E RD
County of Frontenac Townships
E RIDG
E RD
95 WAY HIGH
LIN 4TH
REEDS BAY
REED
OR H SH SOUT
ER RD WILM
E RD
95
E RD
$ +
Wetland LAKE ONTARIO
LIN 7TH
RD
96 WAY HIGH
"
LIN 8TH
"
E RD
LINE
10TH
MARYSVILLE
96
LIN 11TH
$ +
E RD
" > " ;c " "
) " J “> "
"
" c "
= R
"
BASE
Waterbody
7051
T RD
D
RD
BOAT CHANNEL
POIN
R ON
E MM
SIMCOE ISLAND
Crown Land
MILE
TE R
GD
LIN 5TH
Provincial Park
PRINCE EDWARD BAY
International Boundary
LAN
SU
NINE
Hamlet
City of Kingston
WIN
LIN 9TH
RY
AMHERST ISLAND
Other
Parcel Property
RY
R FE
Local Road
FE R
" ; " J )
NE RD
E RD
E IS LF
Major Road
RD
BASELI
R SID LOWE
WO
Highway
LF E IS
DR ISLAND
WO
RE RD
HOW E
SHO "
NORTH
HEAD SPIT
Road Network
DRISC
Unknown Status of Railway
BATEAU CHANNEL
"
NORTH CHANNEL
WOLFE ISLAND
0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
Trails Concept Plan
Page 56 of 149
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
AgendaItem#6•
MAP 7 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN EXISTING SNOWMOBILE TRAILS
BLACK DONALD LAKE
NO RC AN
AM
LN
TC
KE
UN
LA
JUNIPER LAKE H DODGE LAKE
September 2014
P LN
YW MIST
Y
RO
N
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
ER RD
"
MACKIE LAKE
CAMP LAKE
"
" “>
"
MAIR LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE ROUNDCAMP LAKE
"
RD
REDHORSE LAKE
IN
CH
HY
DR
O LN WOLFE LAKE
BUCKSHOT LAKE
SPA
LN LY AL
S
LN ULE
RD R BU RD ES UT
CH ED GG KINGS LAKE
SNOW ROAD STATION
HR OC
COXVALE
AR D
GU
"
"
MISSISSIPPI STATION MISSISSIPPI STATION
CROTCH LAKE
" >
" "
ARDOCH
LN
RD
CLARENDON STATION BURKE SETTLEMENT CLARENDON RD
D
LN T IN
PO
A
SL
M IC
WN
LN NS BU R
LEE RD
RD HANNA
RD
LLE RD
DEVIL
MULVI
LAKE
RD
BURRIDGE
RD S W RE ND MC A
LN OD WO RD HA
LN AS
RIS TM
CH LN VA
NE T
LN
LN
IN PO T N
BA C
RD
BIL LY
CROW LAKE
DEN BR AD
LN RD
RAMP ARTS RD
RN RD
ST AF FO
N LL NA CA
BREWER LAKE
MAPLE HILL RN RD
IDA HILL
EK RD
BREWERS MILLS
BREWER LAKE
D RD
CARD
IN AL
DOG LAKE
"
Y RD
WASHBU
BEAR CRE
BEE RD CRANBERRY LAKE LN GE RID
EVEL
BATT ERSE
RVEY
MCGA
Existing Conditions
SUNBURY SUNBURY
ORMS
HIDEAWA Y LN
L RD
" SUNBUR
J
T EC PL COLLINS LAKE MA
S RD
MILBURN
"
LN
" c
N RD
RD
DIXO N
CEDAR LAKE
"
"
INVERARY LAKE INVERARY INVERARY
SAND
CRANESNEST LAKE LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE RD ILLS RD TH CE RN PLA BU ING BURNT HILLS LA RY UR CA R A LN DOG LAKE
"
"
"
MILBU
ROUND LAKE LAKE RD
ROUND
RD
"
BATTERSEA
SONN
H
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LN AN LE MC
EX LAKE RD AL
NFIELD
TRAVERSE LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE
LN
IDA HIL
"
DAVID SO
LN
EY
RD
GREE
RD
KE LA
LN
G
KEELERVILLE LELAND
KOEN
LATIMER ERT P
RD
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE
UPPER ROCK LAKE
LN EIL
A RD
N
D
HIN FIS
ERNIE LN
"
O’N
HOLM
HT SL
TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
CR
RD
WIL
MISSOURI
“ES RD
R AY
FISHING LAKE
" H RD c
EY RD
LN
R LIV
ON RD
LL VA
DUFF
Y RD
DGES
GIL
WALS
RD
LN E ID FS IF CL LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
DALE
SYDE
R RI
OPINICON LAKE LN OPINICON LAKE TE GA E IC FF HART LAKE TO
S PO
RD
ME R
SILL
A LN SH EIL
ISON
C RD
LN
CEDA
SMITH
LN ART
RD
LAKE OPINICON
HINGE LAKE
GR
MIN LN
RD
D
ORD
S BA YR
BEDF
RD
KEEL
KN IG
ER
BAY LN
GA
"
SPAFFORDTON SPAFFORDTON
RAILTON
SU MA
BU RE
HARP
EE RD
BURNS RD NO
YO
SE RO
LN RE
RETR
H RD
COAC
STAG E
RD
MUR VALE RD
MURTO
GARRET T RD
BUCK BAY RD S
D RD EFOR
RD N IL TO
ROAD
38
W
RIDA FLO
FORE ST RD
DEAN
A
BUCK LAKE
“PERTH ROAD
"
PERTH ROAD
MOONS CORNERS
“RAILTON
FOREST
WILMER WILMER
C MA
OPINIC
N RD HOGA SYDENHAM LAKE
; " )
SA
G AU SS
LN
RD
S MA
"
E LN
" MURVALE
N RD
RAILT ON
"
TAGG
RD
S
RD
LN
R BE
NOBL
GORR
INDIAN LAKE NORW AY RD
RD BAY
MORR
"
RD
"
" c " c RD > " " BELL “=
CAMP
SHALES LN DRAPER LAKE
RAYMONDS CORNERS
"
“BEDFORD MILLS
S BA
EAT LN
ST NOTR
MCLE AN RD
ST
; " ) J” “>
"
BB
RD
RD EA
RUTLSYDENHAM ED GE RD
R
LN
LN
RO
RD
MAN RD
ROSEDALE
ALTO N
RD
TO
DARLING LAKE
EEL
ST
“HARROWSMITH " > c " HA “>
RROW " c SMITH
SLIDE LAKE
RD
ER
"
FRYE
LABELLE LAKE N L YE FR
"
SOUTH OTTER LAKE N "
DOE LAKE
CRONK LAKE BU LL SE YE LN
RD
D
N
S
ND
E DAME
ESON
RD WE
AN
TO
EW
POLLYWOG LAKE
BUCK LAKE
EL
"
KNOWLTON LAKE
FREE
STAR CORNERS
"
N LN
GOULD LAKE
HOLL
QUAR
K RD
RD
RBEC ELLE
SWAM P WOLFE
NLUV EN RD
BIG CLEAR LAKE
LA
YARK
E RD
LE
IP
CLEAR LAKE RD LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
LITTLE SALMON LAKE FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
LE
RD
"
" " J “=
JAMI
C M
RD
AC E
SDAL
S AK BL
LOWER HOLLEFORD
SH E LN
KINGSFORD LAKE
BIRCH LAKE
DESERT LAKE MASO
RD
DEVIL LAKE
"
JOHN MART IN LN
HARTINGTON HOLLEFORD HARTINGTON VA
ALTO N
TUNDRA LN
ALES
EST
E RD
EEL LAKE
"
CHRISTIE LAKE
"
ALPIN
LN GROUSE
SH
RD W
KE RD
BOYC
CANOE LAKE LN TROUT LN KE LA ER MINER LAKE
NORTH OTTER LAKE
HIN
RD
RY
TROU
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES TOBIN
HOLLEFORD LAKE
LS LN
MAN RD FORD
ORTH RD
ES
LN FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE
"
"
“LONG POND LAKE
RD
BEDFORD
EY THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LN ABRA MS LN DESERT LAKE
MA N LN
LY’S
OK
"
WIL
MABE
RD GER
PETW
PETWORTH
NELL
R
OLD MINE LN
CH
GERMAN
"
Legend
M O
TT
HAMBLY LAKE
"
FERMOY NEW
ARTH
BL M HA
"
LN AH IAW WOLFE LAKE
BA Y
" “= c "
"
VERONA LAKE "
LN Y
"
"
POND LILY LAKE
IN M
RD
SON
D
YORK
LONG
ND RD
VERONA
E RD HU FF
ER
NA SA
VE BAN RO K S NA T ST
VERO
T LAK
RO
RD
RD
SW AM
CK
W IL
LN
DESER
VANLUVEN LAKE
RO
PONDLILY LAKE NAPANEE LAKE
MCC ON
LN
KS
BAUD ER DR
HOWES LAKE
RD
WOLFE LAKE
N LN POTSPOON LAKE GARTER LAKE
DE
E BE
EV E
"
MILLER
BURRIDGE LAKE BAY RD BURRIDGE
E LA
RD Y FR E
RD
INB
BELL
WALL
JAM
D
PICCADILLY RAIG C
RD
POO
POLI LN
BENJA
RD
KE
BELLROCK
BROO
GLENDOWER
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
T LA
RD RT PO ST HENRY LN
LATIM ER RD
QUE
"
O
ARENA BDRY RD
RD
BRIGGS LN T LN
EN
SANGSTER LAKE
GODFREY
"
G
ER
BELLROCK
BR AD
LN BOBS LAKE RR BA LN TIMS RD KE LA E HIT BYCROFT LN W WHITE LAKE
MCNICHOLS LN THIRTY ISLAND LAKE
HILL RD
D
N
RD NO RSON
FORTY FOOT RD
RD CLOW
RD BR O
WNS
LAKE RD SECOND LEVE
SN ID CARD LN
FIRS
P RD
R
L
M OW LN EA NB SU
POTS
WE
NH AM
FOUR TH LA
KE RD
SON RD WILKIN D R E R O O M Y M AR
LN
N
T WIT
RD
ES
O
LACKE Y LN
LN
KE
GIL
O M
RAINB
N
N
COLE LAKE
COLE LAKE
OAK FLA TS RD
YL
RL
LA LFE
"
OAK FLATS
KE
OU
WO
MOORE RD
CLAIR RD
COLE
HIC
RD
LN
LN
GRE
N BOBS LAKE
KE R
RD
BOBS N LN
LEA
OC
"
S
D BA
NAP LN
T
ECHO
GR RIDERS EE LN NB AY RD
RD
DE
" HILLC
BOBS LAKEBOBS LAKE
EEK
"
BELK
AN
LIP
FISH CR
ST. ANDREW LAKES
"
BOBS LAKE
R LN
RD
RD
UD
IL
"
"
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
ALDE
T IT
YORK
SO
ELBOW LAKE PH
CHIPPEGO LAKE
"
G
BRADSHAW
"
TICHBORNE TICHBORNE
RD LL BA ST. ANDREW LAKES
WILKINSON
RID
W
RAYMO
E RD
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
SPARKS LN
NE
BOBS LAKE
DE
"
PARHAM J " > “c
“> PARHAM "
RVILL
" DUNCAN LAKE
ECHO LAKE EC HO LAKE RD
MCVEIGH LN
FANNING LN
RD
NEADOW LN
RD AN DE
WAGA
LO
CROW LAKE
RD
K RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARKFIFTH DEPOT LAKE RD KE LA TH FIF
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
ON
HA LN
EAGLE LAKE
WAGARVILLE
ALF
CAMP OCONTO
INT
S LN
GOOD RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
O PO
E LN
R
" OPEONG
ERSO PATT
LN
BE
SUCKER LAKE
"
CROW LAKE CROW LAKE N LN
E
Y
W
H CROW LAKE RD
" OCONTO
D
RO
ROCK LAKE
LN
D OO
RD
N
LONG LAKE MINNIE
CRON
E
SHARBOT LAKE
ME R
DL
LN
LIN
D
RTH
LN
" OLLY
ST. GEORGE LAKE
"
LONG LAKEDUCHARME RD NN
R
UR
MCLEAN RD
K EE
ER
O
CR
B
N
NG
D BA
MCLEAN STU
HM ON
AG W
BENDER RD
LEGGAT LAKE
BABCOCK RD
RIC
"
RO
BU
D
CROSS RD
NR
ST M AR
LE
YO TR
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
SH IB
SON RD
RD
D
LS
N O’REILLY LAKE LN
Y LAKE ORIELL
LN
IN
UNGAVA
GU
N LN
STEELE
LN
ER RD
RD
$ +
CA
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
CA
HA
SILVER LAKE
BR ES
BR EW
RD
" LAKE
c SHARBOT R “D ON “c NN > ;SHARBOT LAKE " ) " J c " "
ELBOW LAKE RD "
IGUE
NE
D
BOBBY RD
NALD
HIGHWAY 7 "
LAKE RD
N
BLACK LAKE SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EM PIR E LN
ND
7
W
TENA
AK ER
THOMP
RV E
WHITE LAKE
RD
BASS LAKE DUN
CARNAHAN LAKE MCDO
DE
SL
LA
BRASH LN
RD W
D LN
WES
NORTH
T EN
RD
LN
LD
BA S
LONG LAKE
R
HARO
C RD
RD
CK
D
FRON
RIDGELAND RD
LN
NE BU R
ARDEN RD
RD
" c “M= J "
"
A ZE
LN
G TR
PIT
ER
BR O
RD
DIN
"
BRADLEY RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE L R IL
AM TH
WIN
E RD HORSESHOE LAKE DR BAY BIG
PH CLARK
N
T LN SPOR
RIM BERT
ND
U SO
RRY LAK
EL
LOUDEN LN
TH U
B OE
SWAMP RD
DAWSON RD
BULL LAKE RD
D
BUCK LAKE RD COX
BULL LAKE
LN
PRICE RD
RD
LIN E
BELL
D
NR
ON LN
"
WILLETT
“J
" " “>
BIG CLEAR LAKE C P LN
ARDEN
SEOULS CORNERS
RR IVE
ARDENDALE
RO
JORD
PARKS RD
RD ER HAU CRANBE OM
E RD
ND
CK RD
GE
WEDLO
ELM TRE
R LN
LR
TR TEALGARRISON LAKE
WALLBRIDGE LAKE
ELM TREE
R BA
SALMON RIVER
SE
N
EEK LN
L FA
YL KA
KED CR
FOX RD
BLU
CROO
KENNEBEC LAKE RI E HERON
" G LN
OSO
WARRENS LAKE
WILKES LN
"
BORDENWOOD
"
LE BAKER VALLEY RD
RD
TOWN LINE RD
DSON
BOLTON LAKES
IS
RY NG HU
RICH AR
MENT RD
BA YR
D
MINK LAKE
G RD
BURKE SETTLE
HUNGRY LAKE
PERT H RD
" "
HENDERSON
RD
BORDENW OOD RD
ON ARMSTR
RD
CA
OW N
WIL
LN AY SB ALF UNKN
RD
RD
WILLIS
KI
VE
UR
GU LL
KIRK COVE
KO RK
ROAD 509
VE L
BIG
HENDERSON RD
RTSV ILLE RD
ROBERTSVILLE
EY
RD
DR
YR
LN
N LN "
LE
ROBE
S SHORE
TL
N
SHINER RD
Y
OLD
BIG GULL LAKE
"
"
HE
LN
BELL
SO AR C D YR LLE
BR O
IT
RD
IL
Y LN LINDE
GULL LAKE LN
"
RD
RD GREER M LN FAR
EM
"
MILLERS LAKE
LEMKE LN COXVILLE
RD
S RD HAYE
" “>
SNOW ROAD STATION
"
RD
WINTERGREEN RD GULL LAKE " HARLOWE
"
CROTCH LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
E LN
PINE LAKE
QUEBEC LAKE
HARLOWE RD
ARDOCH LAKE
"
"
ID
KE S
PIN
U
HIT ES
DONALDSON DONALDSON
MORROW RD
"
D
ER
FO
Q
W
BO
PE T
WIL
LN
WILBUR
ANTOINE LAKE
K
S LN
TOWE
AN
K” MA > KA "
WA SH " KA >
BEATTY
EE N
LN OTTO
AUSTRIS RD LA
S KASH LAKE LN
E LAK
D
D
KIN
TR
KE RD
R LN
SMITH RD
MA R
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
ST
LN
BU
S
RD
SH
R LN MANO WATK INS LN MALCOLM LAKE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
TH
"
MUD LAKE RD
R RIVE
D
U SO
MINKTRACK LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
VAN S LA
"
RA
LN LS M IL
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
HR
CANNON TL
"
SUNDAY LAKE
ER LA
RD HTS HEIG ZINAW S MA
"
LN
NG
RD
OC
LN
RD 3
OMPAH
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
" ARDOCH
"
ARDOCH
"
RD 506
M RD
SAGER LN
ST RE
TR
E OAK RD CAV RS MYE
"
"
FO
"
BROWNS BAY LN
"
"
AR ST
RD MISSISSIPPI RIVER
C
O NT
“=
“> " “> J " >
OMPAH
"
RD
D AR
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
N
E LAKE
SKOOTAMAT TA LAKE RD
ADA STRUTH
SWAMP LAKE
E LN
FERNLEIGH
HEAD RD
" CLOYNE J " c "
ADDINGTON
ES
FERNLEIGH
" MARBLE LAKE
MYERS CAVE
KE
O AN
ER RD
9
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
LAK NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
"
CLOYNE
PALMERSTON LAKE
RD
; " " )
NORTH RD
SHABOMEKA LAKE RD
"
LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
" RD
ER
LA
RD 50
SAND LAKE HR AC BE
SHABOMEKA LAKE LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
ID SN
E
“D
BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
MARBL
"
RD
LAKE
SAND
KISHKEBUS LAKE
JAM
" PLEVNA
" " J “>
" PLEVNA c
FOLG
DRAP
HWY 41
BON ECHO
41
QU
A LN
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
"
SPRO
BEECH CORNERS
LS
MO S
D
LAKE RD
HIL KLIM
ER
LAK
CANONTO CANONTO
CANONTO LAKE
ER U YO
"
$ +
RD
CRUISE RD
"
MOSQUE LAKE
"
OL
GRINDSTONE LAKE
E BAY RD
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
C AR
SUMMIT LAKE
"
LL
FAWN LAKE
R
RD
MO U
KE LA
BIG LAKE
RD
NTA
E
"
"
M
"
G
RD
UL
V
N
BR
O
TO ER
HA
FFIE LN
LUCKY LAKE
LS
BRULE LAKE
M IL
D
N
NR
SCHOON
OW
"
GOVAN LAKE
HA AT
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
BR
SS
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
RU
NORCAN LAKE
HE
SKEAD LAKE
TRAPPER LAKE
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
RIVER STYX
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
Existing Snowmobile Trails
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
;
" )
Emergency Service
CITY OF KINGSTON
Library Municipal School
"
Other Key Destinations
"
Railways
TOWN OF GANANOQUE
BYRNE POINT
Abandoned Railway
"
RD
KIE
LL
LN
POIN
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
T RD
RD
PORT METCALF
LINE
RD
19TH
R LN
LINE
RD
LE MIL
18TH
LINE
Y LN IS BA
LINE
LEW
"
IE LN
16TH
ALAR
MCDONALD LN
IDAY
17TH
HOLL
JOSLIN’S LN
RD
RD
R’S PO
INT RD
A
"
IC
EN TE
CA NA ST AT DA ES O F A M
ER
RD
IT
ED
POINT ALEXANDRIA
UN
3RD LINE RD
LINE
2ND LINE RD
OLL RD
R RD FULLE
LINE
LN
ETT
"
"
13TH
RD
$ +
SON
12TH
BA Y
BUTTON_BAY
EN STEV
BIG SANDY BAY
Y RD ‘S BA
BENN
ND RD
E RD
BAYFIELD BAY
RD
RIDG
ER RD WILM
THOUSAND ISLANDS
NE
LA HIGH
OR H SH SOUT
LI 9TH
Y LN
SCOTCH SETTLEMENT
CARP
BU TT ON
96 WAY HIGH
RD
S EA
E RD
LINE
E RD
County of Frontenac Townships
International Boundary
LIN 4TH
REEDS BAY
REED
E RD
95 WAY HIGH
Wetland LAKE ONTARIO
E RD
$ + 95
10TH
WOLFE ISLAND
E RD
RD
"
LIN 7TH
E SE LIN
LIN 11TH
"
E RD
BA
Waterbody
96
LIN 8TH
BOAT CHANNEL
$ +
E RD
SIMCOE ISLAND
Crown Land
"
LIN 5TH
Provincial Park
PRINCE EDWARD BAY
" > " ;c " "
) " J “> "
"
" c "
MARYSVILLE MARYSVILLE R
T RD
SIMCOE ISLAND
D
7051
POIN
GD
R ON
E MM
MILE
TE R
RD
LAN
SU
NINE
Hamlet
City of Kingston
WIN
LIN 9TH
RY
AMHERST ISLAND
Other
Parcel Property
RY
R FE
Local Road
FE R
" ; " J )
NE RD
E RD
E IS LF
Major Road
RD
BASELI
R SID LOWE
WO
Highway
LF E IS
DR ISLAND
WO
RE RD
HOW E
SHO "
NORTH
HEAD SPIT
Road Network
DRISC
Unknown Status of Railway
BATEAU CHANNEL
"
NORTH CHANNEL
WOLFE ISLAND
0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
Trails Concept Plan
Page 57 of 149
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
AgendaItem#6•
MAP 8 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY TRAIL OPPORTUNITIES
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN
BLACK DONALD LAKE
NO RC AN
AM
LN
TC
KE
UN
LA
JUNIPER LAKE H DODGE LAKE
September 2014
P LN
YW MIST
Y
RO
N
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
ER RD
"
MACKIE LAKE
CAMP LAKE
"
" “>
"
MAIR LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE ROUNDCAMP LAKE
"
RD
REDHORSE LAKE
IN
CH
HY
DR
O LN WOLFE LAKE
BUCKSHOT LAKE
LN LY AL
S
LN ULE
RD R BU RD ES UT
CH ED GG
"
"
ARDOCH
LN
RD
CLARENDON RD
FANNING LN
RD
LN
LN T A M IC
LN
RD HANNA
RD
LLE RD
LAKE
MULVI
RD S W RE ND MC A
LN OD WO RD HA
AS
RIS TM
RD
CH
LN
KE LA
RVEY
MCGA
(outside Frontenac County)
DEN BR AD
WASHBU
BEAR CRE
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail
EK RD
LN RD ST AF FO
RAMP ARTS RD
"
Y RD
SUNBURY
LL
N
BEE RD CRANBERRY LAKE LN GE RID
DOG LAKE
CA
IN AL
" SUNBUR
J
T EC PL COLLINS LAKE MA
"
ORMS
LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE
NA
S RD
CARD
N RD
RD
DIXO N
SAND
" c
INVERARY LAKE
CRANESNEST LAKE RD ILLS RD TH CE RN PLA BU ING LA RY UR CA R A LN DOG LAKE
"
"
"
RN RD
ROUND LAKE LAKE RD
ROUND
RD
"
BATTERSEA
HIDEAWA Y LN
RD DUFF
NFIELD
"
INVERARY "
TRAVERSE LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE
BREWER LAKE
EVEL
TH
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LN AN LE MC
SONN
RD
G
LN
MILBU
LN
EY
EX LAKE RD AL
A RD
N
LN T IN PO T
N
HIN FIS RD
L RD
ARTH
DAVID SO
R PE
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE
UPPER ROCK LAKE
LN EIL
GREE
"
HOLM
HT SL
TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
DEVIL
LN
SMITH
KOEN
"
O’N
“ES RD
D
FISHING LAKE
" H RD c
EY RD
LN
VA
NE
RD
SILL
Y RD DGES
R AY
CROW LAKE
WALS
RD
BATT ERSE
R RI
R LIV
ON RD
LL VA
RD
CEDA
GIL
ME R
WIL
ISON
LATIM ER RD
LN
LN
LN BA C
GR
CR
PERT H RD
WIL
BENJA
WILMER
LN E ID FS IF CL LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
DALE
RD NH AM SYDE
BAY LN ER
LEE RD
RD
BURRIDGE
GARRET T RD
BIL LY
KE RD
ER LA DRAP
MIN LN
RD
D
ORD
S BA YR
BEDF
DEAN
"
C RD
KN IG
HARP
(outside Frontenac County)
RN RD
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
RIVER STYX
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
;
" )
(outside Frontenac County)
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
IN
PO
N SL WN
NS LN
NO
YO DE
SE
LN RE
RETR
H RD
MUR VALE RD
STAG E
38 ROAD RD
A LN
RD N IL TO W
RIDA FLO
COAC
GA
S PO
LN
KEEL
OPINICON LAKE LN OPINICON LAKE TE GA E IC FF HART LAKE TO
HINGE LAKE
"
"
PERTH ROAD
N RD HOGA SYDENHAM LAKE
; " )
SU MA
BU RE
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
INDIAN LAKE NORW AY RD
SPAFFORDTON
“RAILTON
FORE ST RD
N RD
C MA
OPINIC
ERNIE LN
RD
LN
S
MURTO
RAILT ON
SA
LN ART
RD
BUCK LAKE
E LN
"
RD
"
RD BAY
MORR
S MA
"
A
S BA
"
" c " c RD > " " BELL “=
CAMP
"
TAGG
G AU SS
RD
NELL
ST
; " ) J” “>
SH EIL
NOTR
RD EA
RUTLSYDENHAM ED GE RD
"
BB
GORR
RO
D RD EFOR ALTO N
R BE
NOBL
MCC ON
MAN RD
EAT LN
ST
HOLL
QUAR
K RD
RD
RBEC
EEL
RD
SHALES LN DRAPER LAKE
DARLING LAKE
ST
“HARROWSMITH " > c " HA “>
RROW " c SMITH
MCLE AN RD
"
SLIDE LAKE
TO
CRONK LAKE BU LL SE YE LN
"
RO
RD
"
SOUTH OTTER LAKE N "
DOE LAKE
EL
"
RD
"
RD
ER
E
RD
OK
CH RD WE
R
LN
LN
ND
E DAME
ESON
FREE ALTO N
FRYE
LABELLE LAKE N L YE FR
GOULD LAKE
KNOWLTON LAKE
D
N
S
RD
LA
WOLFE
ELLE
SWAM P
JAMI
UVEN RD
LE
AN
TO
EW
POLLYWOG LAKE
LE
YARK
E RD
VANL
BIG CLEAR LAKE
BUCK LAKE
RD
RD
"
" " J “=
"
N LN
ALES
AC E
S AK BL
IP
CLEAR LAKE RD LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
LITTLE SALMON LAKE FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
JOHN MART IN LN
SDAL
HARTINGTON
C M
BIRCH LAKE
"
MASO
RD
DEVIL LAKE
"
"
SH E LN
KINGSFORD LAKE
SH
EST
E RD
TUNDRA LN
NORTH OTTER LAKE
LS LN
MAN RD
RD W
KE RD
BOYC
CHRISTIE LAKE
"
ALPIN
LN GROUSE
HOLLEFORD LAKE
HIN
RD
RY
TROU
CANOE LAKE LN TROUT LN KE LA ER MINER LAKE
EEL LAKE
LN FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE
TT
HAMBLY LAKE
ORTH RD
ES
IN M
RD
SON
EY THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LN ABRA MS LN DESERT LAKE
MA N LN
LY’S
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES TOBIN
POND LILY LAKE
S WIL
MABE
RD GER
FORD
RD
R
LN
BL M HA
"
E LA
RD
O
G
" “= c "
"
VERONA LAKE "
LN Y "
W IL
D
YORK
VERONA
Existing Conditions
Existing Off-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route.
M O
OLD MINE LN
ER
ND RD
VE BAN RO K S NA T ST
NA SA
E RD HU FF
RO
VERO
LONG
GERMAN
Trail Opportunities
LN
KS
BAUD ER DR
INB
RD
RD
SW AM
CK
T LAK
"
LN AH IAW WOLFE LAKE
“LONG POND LAKE
RD
KE R
HILL RD
FR E D
E BE
HOWES LAKE
RD
DESER
VANLUVEN LAKE
RO
PETW
WALL
JAM
RD
EV E
MILLER
"
"
SANGSTER LAKE
Y
"
RD
NEW
WOLFE LAKE
LN
FORTY FOOT RD
RD CLOW
RD WNS
LAKE RD SECOND
BR O
"
PICCADILLY RAIG C
"
BROO
BUCK BAY
KE RD FOUR TH LA
SON RD WILKIN D R E R O O M Y M AR
P RD
ARENA BDRY RD
RD
BURRIDGE LAKE BAY RD
N LN POTSPOON LAKE GARTER LAKE
POLI LN
MCNICHOLS LN THIRTY ISLAND LAKE
GODFREY
"
POO
BRIGGS LN T LN
EN
RD
D
RD RT PO ST HENRY LN
GRE
N BOBS LAKE
KE
ER
PONDLILY LAKE NAPANEE LAKE
BR AD
Connect Towns to Towns
R
LACKE Y LN
LA LFE
LN
RD
KE
PETWORTH
Connect Parks to Parks
ES
QUE BELL
"
Connect Towns to Parks
N
N
L
M OW LN EA NB SU
POTS
WE
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
T LA
BELLROCK
Connect / Complete the “Spine” Network
GIL
LEVE
SN ID CARD LN
FIRS
Legend
O
RAINB
"
COLE LAKE
OAK FLA TS RD
O M
YL
N
WO
ST. ANDREW LAKES
MOORE RD
KE
RL
LN
T WIT
" HILLC
LN BOBS LAKE RR BA LN TIMS RD KE LA E HIT BYCROFT LN W WHITE LAKE
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
CLAIR RD
COLE
HIC
RD
LN
LN
OU
NAP LN
T
"
S
RD LL BA ST. ANDREW LAKES
CHIPPEGO LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
BOBS LAKE GR RIDERS EE LN NB AY RD
RD
DE
BURNS RD
N LN
LEA
OC
EEK
D BA
BELK
AN
LIP
FISH CR
"
RD
RD
UD
IL
"
"
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
"
BOBS LAKE
R LN
T IT
YORK
SO
ELBOW LAKE PH
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
ALDE
W
BOBS
TICHBORNE
"
" DUNCAN LAKE
"
G
DE
RD
E RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARKFIFTH DEPOT LAKE RD KE LA TH FIF
SPARKS LN
RID
BOBS LAKE
BU R
"
J " > “c
“> PARHAM "
RAYMO
RSON
NEADOW LN
RD AN DE
RVILL
RD NO
K RD
WAGA
NE
E LN
RD
EAGLE LAKE
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
LO
CROW LAKE
S LN
GOOD RD
ECHO LAKE EC HO LAKE RD
D
HA
ALF
INT
N LN
D RD
O PO
ERSO PATT
R
" OPEONG
SUCKER LAKE
"
CROW LAKE
D
BE
W
"
CA
Y
ROCK LAKE
RD
RO
E
LN
D OO
ME R
N
LIN
SHARBOT LAKE
H CROW LAKE RD
"
LN
NG
D
RD
DL
" OLLY
ST. GEORGE LAKE LEGGAT LAKE
NN
R
BENDER RD
DUCHARME RD
LONG LAKE MINNIE
CRON
ER
RTH
LN
N
UR
MCLEAN RD
K EE
AG W
RO
O
CR
B
"
ST M AR
ELBOW LAKE RD UE GUIG
CROSS RD
D
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
LE
NR
IN
SH IB
YO TR
RD
$ +
D BA
U ST
HM ON
ON
N O’REILLY LAKE LN
SON RD
BABCOCK RD
RIC
LS
N LN
RD
D
R “D ON “c NN > ; " ) " J c " "
“>
STEELE
LN
ER RD
HA
SILVER LAKE
CA
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
CA
RD
EE RD
BR EW
"
c
SHARBOT LAKE
NE
D
Y LAKE ORIELL
LN
FOX RD
N
BLACK LAKE SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EM PIR E LN
BOBBY RD
NALD
HIGHWAY 7 "
W
TENA
AK ER
THOMP
RV E
WHITE LAKE
RD
ND
7
LAKE RD
CARNAHAN LAKE MCDO
DE
SL
LA
BR ES
RD W
D LN WES
NORTH
T EN
RD
LN
LD
BA S
BASS LAKE DUN
LOUDEN LN
RD
RD
CK
D
LONG LAKE
R
HARO
C RD
BR O
" c “M= J "
"
FRON
RIDGELAND RD
LN
NE BU R
ARDEN RD
"
BRADLEY RD
A ZE
D
BULL LAKE RD
SWAMP RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE L R IL
T LN SPOR
LN
G TR
PIT
ER
PH CLARK
N
RD
LIN E
BELL
RIM BERT
ND
EL
RD
DIN
B OE
PRICE RD
AM TH
WIN
E RD HORSESHOE LAKE DR BAY BIG
R LN
DAWSON RD
TH U
U SO
RRY LAK
R BA
RR IVE
D
BUCK LAKE RD COX
BULL LAKE
LN
BIG CLEAR LAKE C P LN
ARDEN
NR
ON LN
"
WILLETT
“J
" " “>
RO
JORD
PARKS RD
RD ER HAU CRANBE OM
E RD
ND
CK RD
ELM TRE
GE
ELM TREE
EEK LN
LR
TR TEALGARRISON LAKE
WALLBRIDGE LAKE
S RD HAYE
KED CR
SALMON RIVER
SE
N
CROO
KENNEBEC LAKE RI E HERON
L FA
YL KA
" G LN
WARRENS LAKE
WILKES LN
"
BLU
"
LE BAKER VALLEY RD
RD
TOWN LINE RD
DSON
BOLTON LAKES
IS
RY NG HU
RICH AR
MENT RD
BA YR
D
MINK LAKE
G RD
BURKE SETTLE
HUNGRY LAKE
ON ARMSTR
RD
" "
HENDERSON
RD
OW N
BORDENW OOD RD
UR
LN AY SB ALF UNKN
BU
RD VE L
EY
GU LL
RD
WILLIS
KI
VE
RTSV ILLE RD
ROBERTSVILLE
ROAD 509
LN
BIG
KO RK
SHINER RD
Y
" >
" "
DR
TL
N
MISSISSIPPI STATION
CROTCH LAKE
N LN "
LE
ROBE
S SHORE
SO AR C D YR LLE
YR
IT
RD
IL
OLD
HE
LN
BELL
BIG GULL LAKE
"
"
HENDERSON RD
WEDLO
D R
HR OC AR D
GU
BR O
U
Y LN LINDE
"
RD
RD GREER M LN FAR
EM
"
MILLERS LAKE
LEMKE LN COXVILLE
RD GULL LAKE LN
GULL LAKE " HARLOWE
"
" “>
SNOW ROAD STATION
QUEBEC LAKE
HARLOWE RD
KINGS LAKE
"
D
ER
FO
Q
HIT ES
CROTCH LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
E LN
PINE LAKE
RD
WINTERGREEN RD
BO
PE T
WIL
LN
IDA HIL
S LN
TOWE
AN
W
ARDOCH LAKE
"
"
ID
KE S
S KASH LAKE LN
E LAK
DONALDSON MORROW RD
"
LS
SPA
AUSTRIS RD LA
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
ST
LN
ANTOINE LAKE
M IL
KIN
D
G
OTTO
LN
R LN
SMITH RD
MA R
TR
MCVEIGH LN
LN
CANNON TL
AR ST T ES
RD
SH
R LN MANO WATK INS LN MALCOLM LAKE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
TH
SAGER LN
K” MA > KA "
WA SH " KA >
TR
E OAK RD CAV RS MYE
RD 3
U SO
MINKTRACK LAKE
BU
S
MUD LAKE RD
"
ARDOCH
D
"
BROWNS BAY LN
"
R RIVE
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
VAN S LA
"
RA
LN LS M IL
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
HR
N
RD
"
"
R FO
"
SUNDAY LAKE
OC
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
LN
NG
RD
PIN
HWY 41
RD HTS HEIG ZINAW S MA
RD
ADAM
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
RD 506
HEAD RD
E LAKE
SKOOTAMAT TA LAKE RD
STRUTH
SWAMP LAKE
LAKE LN
FERNLEIGH
" MARBLE LAKE
MYERS CAVE
OMPAH
D AR
NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
" J " c "
ADDINGTON
ES
C
O NT
“=
“> " “> J " >
"
RD
O AN
ER RD
9
SHABOMEKA LAKE RD
"
CLOYNE
KE
RD
; " " )
NORTH RD
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
"
LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
" RD
ER
PALMERSTON LAKE
RD 50
SAND LAKE HR AC BE
SHABOMEKA LAKE LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
ID SN
LA
“D
BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
MARBL
"
JAM
" PLEVNA
" " J “>
" c
RD
LAKE
E
A LN
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
SAND
QU
SPRO
"
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
LS
MO S
D
LAKE RD
HIL KLIM
ER
LAK
FOLG
"
CANONTO
CANONTO LAKE
ER U YO
"
KISHKEBUS LAKE
RD
CRUISE RD
"
MOSQUE LAKE
41
OL
GRINDSTONE LAKE
E BAY RD
$ +
C AR
SUMMIT LAKE
"
LL
FAWN LAKE
BRASH LN
RD
MO U
KE LA
BIG LAKE
RD
NTA
E
"
"
M
"
BA Y
RD
UL
V
N
BR
O
TO ER
HA
FFIE LN
LUCKY LAKE
K
BRULE LAKE
EE N
D
N
NR
SCHOON
OW
"
GOVAN LAKE
HA AT
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
BR
SS
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
RU
NORCAN LAKE
HE
SKEAD LAKE
TRAPPER LAKE
CITY OF KINGSTON
Emergency Service Library
"
Municipal
"
School Other Key Destinations
TOWN OF GANANOQUE
BYRNE POINT BATEAU CHANNEL
"
RD
RD
KIE
"
LL
LN
POIN
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
T RD
LINE
RD
19TH
R LN
LINE
RD
LE MIL
18TH
RD
Y LN IS BA
LINE
LEW
"
IE LN
LINE
ALAR
MCDONALD LN
IDAY
17TH
HOLL
16TH
RD
A IC ER
R’S
CA NA ST DA AT ES O F A M
"
RD POINT
ED IT N U
3RD LINE RD
LINE
2ND LINE RD
OLL RD
R RD FULLE
LINE
BIG SANDY BAY
SON
EN TE
RD
RD
$ +
BUTTON_BAY
EN STEV
ETT
"
"
13TH
ND RD
City of Kingston International Boundary
BENN
BA Y
12TH
LA HIGH
CARP
BU TT ON
E RD
BAYFIELD BAY
RD
Y LN
RD
ER RD WILM
Y RD ‘S BA
HOWE ISLAND
NE
E RD
S EA
E RIDG
REED
OR H SH SOUT
LI 9TH
REEDS BAY
LIN 4TH
LAKE ONTARIO
RD
95 WAY HIGH
Waterbody Wetland
LINE
95
E RD
$ +
E RD
RD
E RD
LINE
96 WAY HIGH
"
LIN 8TH
"
LIN 7TH
BASE
10TH
MARYSVILLE
96
LIN 11TH
$ +
E RD
" > " ;c " "
) " J “> "
"
" c "
R
BOAT CHANNEL
"
E RD
Crown Land
T RD
D
7051
SIMCOE ISLAND
Provincial Park
POIN
LIN 5TH
Hamlet
PRINCE EDWARD BAY
MILE
GD
R ON
E MM
NINE
TE R
RD
LAN
SU
Local Road
County of Frontenac Townships
WIN
LIN 9TH
RY
AMHERST ISLAND
Other
Parcel Property
RY
R FE
Major Road
FE R
" ; " J )
NE RD
E RD
E IS LF
Highway
RD
BASELI
R SID LOWE
WO
Road Network
LF E IS
DR ISLAND
HEAD SPIT
WO
HOW E
SHO "
NORTH
Abandoned Railway Unknown Status of Railway
RE RD
JOSLIN’S LN
NORTH CHANNEL
DRISC
Railways
LN
WOLFE ISLAND
0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
Trails Concept Plan
Page 58 of 149
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
AgendaItem#6•
MAP 9 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY FACILITY TYPE
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN
BLACK DONALD LAKE
NO RC AN
AM
LN
TC
KE
UN
LA
JUNIPER LAKE H DODGE LAKE
September 2014
P LN
YW MIST
Y
RO
N
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
FORTUNE LAKE
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
ER RD
"
MACKIE LAKE
CAMP LAKE
"
" “>
"
MAIR LAKE SOUTH QUINN LAKE
BIG OHLMANN LAKE
REID LAKE ROUNDCAMP LAKE
"
RD
REDHORSE LAKE
IN
CH
HY
DR
O LN WOLFE LAKE
BUCKSHOT LAKE
LN LY AL
S
LN ULE
RD R BU RD ES UT
CH ED GG
"
"
ARDOCH
LN
RD
CLARENDON RD
FANNING LN
RD
LN
LN T IN
PO
N
A
SL
M IC
WN
LN NS
RD HANNA
RD
LLE RD
LAKE
RD S W RE ND MC A
LN OD WO RD HA
LN AS
RIS TM
CH
CROW LAKE
RD
KE LA
DEN BR AD
EK RD
LN RD
CA
IN AL
BREWER LAKE
EVEL
WASHBU
SONN
RVEY
MCGA
"
Y RD
SUNBURY
BEAR CRE
(outside Frontenac County)
DOG LAKE
CARD
" SUNBUR
J
T EC PL COLLINS LAKE MA
BEE RD CRANBERRY LAKE LN GE RID
N
L RD
N RD
RD
"
ORMS
LL
S RD
LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE
NA
SAND
" c
CRANESNEST LAKE RD ILLS RD TH CE RN PLA BU ING LA RY UR CA R A LN DOG LAKE
"
"
"
ST AF FO
"
BATTERSEA RN RD
RD DUFF
ROUND LAKE LAKE RD
INVERARY LAKE
RAMP ARTS RD
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LN AN LE MC
ROUND
RD
A RD
TH
NFIELD
"
INVERARY "
TRAVERSE LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE
LN
HIDEAWA Y LN
LN
EY
EX LAKE RD AL
BATT ERSE
RD
G
LN
HIN FIS RD FISHING LAKE
KOEN
RD
Y RD DALE
HOLM
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Rideau Heritage Trails Rideau Heritage Trails
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE
MILBU
RD
LATIM ER RD
DAVID SO
R PE
D
UPPER ROCK LAKE
LN EIL
GREE
"
“ES RD
R AY
LL VA
"
LN E ID FS IF CL LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
N
LN IN PO T
N
BA C SMITH
" H RD c
O’N
LN
VA
NE T
LN
LN R LIV
ON RD
WALS
RD
DIXO N
Existing Off-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route.
GIL
ME R
WIL
ISON
EY RD
HT SL
ER TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
S PO
GR BIL LY
CR
PERT H RD
WIL
BENJA
SILL
A LN R RI
DGES
DEVIL
MULVI NO
KE RD
ER LA DRAP
MIN LN
RD
D
ORD
S BA YR
BEDF RD
NH AM SYDE
BAY LN
CEDA
KN IG
HARP
LEE RD
BURRIDGE
GARRET T RD
RD
LN E
RD S YO DE
SE
LN
RETR
H RD
COAC
MUR VALE RD
STAG E
38 ROAD RD RIDA FLO
SH EIL
RD N IL TO W
NELL
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
WILMER
"
C RD
LN
OPINICON LAKE LN OPINICON LAKE TE GA E IC FF HART LAKE TO
HINGE LAKE
LN
GA
BUCK LAKE
"
"
PERTH ROAD DEAN
LN ART
RD
S
KEEL
SA
A
S BA
; " )
SU MA
BU RE
Existing Conditions
C MA
N RD HOGA SYDENHAM LAKE
SPAFFORDTON
“RAILTON
FORE ST RD
N RD
LN
OPINIC
ERNIE LN
RD
S MA
G AU SS
RD
MURTO
RAILT ON
"
TAGG
"
E LN
"
RD
INDIAN LAKE NORW AY RD
RD BAY
MORR
"
BB
"
" c " c RD > " " BELL “=
CAMP
"
"
RO
MCC ON
ST
; " ) J” “>
R BE
NOBL
GORR
RO
D RD EFOR
NOTR
RD EA
RUTLSYDENHAM ED GE RD
EAT LN
ST E DAME
HOLL
QUAR
K RD
RD
RBEC ELLE
SWAM P
MCLE AN RD
ALTO N
RD
"
RD
RD
EEL
ST
“HARROWSMITH " > c " HA “>
RROW " c SMITH
SHALES LN DRAPER LAKE
DARLING LAKE
MAN RD
R
LN
LN
ND
ER
"
SLIDE LAKE
TO
CRONK LAKE BU LL SE YE LN
RD
D
N
S
RD
LA
YARK
"
SOUTH OTTER LAKE N "
DOE LAKE
EL
"
KNOWLTON LAKE
FRYE
LABELLE LAKE N L YE FR
GOULD LAKE
FREE RD WE
LE
AN
TO
EW
POLLYWOG LAKE
LE
WOLFE
ESON
UVEN RD
BIG CLEAR LAKE
BUCK LAKE
RD
RD
E RD
VANL
JAMI
ALTO N
"
N LN
ALES
AC E
S AK BL
IP
CLEAR LAKE RD LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
SH
EST
"
" " J “=
C M
LITTLE SALMON LAKE FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE
JOHN MART IN LN
SDAL
SH E LN
KINGSFORD LAKE
BIRCH LAKE
"
MASO
RD
DEVIL LAKE
"
"
HARTINGTON
TUNDRA LN
NORTH OTTER LAKE
LS LN
MAN RD
RD W
KE RD
E RD
CHRISTIE LAKE
"
ALPIN
LN GROUSE
HOLLEFORD LAKE
HIN
RD
RY
TROU
BOYC
EEL LAKE
LN FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE
MABE
RD GER
FORD
ORTH RD
ES
EY THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LN ABRA MS LN DESERT LAKE
MA N LN
LY’S
OK
"
WIL
TT
HAMBLY LAKE
CANOE LAKE LN TROUT LN KE LA ER MINER LAKE
ARTH
BL M HA
CH
GERMAN
PETW
RD
R
OLD MINE LN
Potential Staging Areas
(outside Frontenac County)
M O
LN
" “= c "
"
VERONA LAKE "
LN Y
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES TOBIN
POND LILY LAKE
IN M
RD
SON
D
VERONA
YORK
LONG
ND RD
VE BAN RO K S NA T ST
NA SA
E RD HU FF
RO
VERO
T LAK
INB
RD
RD
SW AM
CK
PETWORTH
WALL
LN
KS
BAUD ER DR
HOWES LAKE
RD
DESER
VANLUVEN LAKE
RO
W IL
RE
MILLER
"
E LA
RD
E BE
EV E
"
RD
"
LN AH IAW WOLFE LAKE
“LONG POND LAKE
RD
KE R
HILL RD
Y
RD
ER
KE
"
BROO
JAM
FR E
PICCADILLY RAIG C
"
"
SANGSTER LAKE
D O
G
"
NEW
WOLFE LAKE
LN
FORTY FOOT RD
RD CLOW
RD WNS
LAKE RD SECOND
BR O
ARENA BDRY RD
RD
PONDLILY LAKE NAPANEE LAKE
BR AD
BUCK BAY
KE RD FOUR TH LA
SON RD WILKIN D R E R O O M Y M AR
RD P RD
ER
BURRIDGE LAKE BAY RD
N LN POTSPOON LAKE GARTER LAKE
POLI LN
MCNICHOLS LN THIRTY ISLAND LAKE
GODFREY
"
POO
BRIGGS LN T LN
EN
RD
D
RD RT PO ST HENRY LN
GRE
N BOBS LAKE
KE
LN
R
LACKE Y LN
LA LFE
ES
QUE BELL
"
On-Road Paved Shoulder On-Road Signed Route Off-Road (K&P Trail)
N
N
L
M OW LN EA NB SU
POTS
WE
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
T LA
BELLROCK
Legend
GIL
LEVE
SN ID CARD LN
FIRS
Trail Opportunities
O
RAINB
"
COLE LAKE
OAK FLA TS RD
O M
YL
N
WO
ST. ANDREW LAKES
MOORE RD
KE
RL
LN
T WIT
" HILLC
LN BOBS LAKE RR BA LN TIMS RD KE LA E HIT BYCROFT LN W WHITE LAKE
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
CLAIR RD
COLE
HIC
RD
LN
LN
OU
NAP LN
T
"
S
RD LL BA ST. ANDREW LAKES
CHIPPEGO LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
BOBS LAKE GR RIDERS EE LN NB AY RD
RD
DE
BURNS RD
N LN
LEA
OC
EEK
D BA
BELK
AN
LIP
FISH CR
"
RD
RD
UD
IL
"
"
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
"
BOBS LAKE
R LN
T IT
YORK
SO
ELBOW LAKE PH
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
ALDE
W
BOBS
TICHBORNE
"
" DUNCAN LAKE
"
G
DE
RD
E RD
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARKFIFTH DEPOT LAKE RD KE LA TH FIF
SPARKS LN
RID
BOBS LAKE
BU R
"
J " > “c
“> PARHAM "
RAYMO
RSON
NEADOW LN
RD AN DE
RVILL
RD NO
K RD
WAGA
NE
E LN
RD
EAGLE LAKE
PUZZLE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK
LO
CROW LAKE
S LN
GOOD RD
ECHO LAKE EC HO LAKE RD
D
HA
ALF
INT
N LN
D RD
O PO
ERSO PATT
R
" OPEONG
SUCKER LAKE
"
CROW LAKE
D
BE
W
"
CA
Y
ROCK LAKE
RD
RO
E
LN
D OO
ME R
N
LIN
SHARBOT LAKE
H CROW LAKE RD
"
LN
NG
D
RD
DL
" OLLY
ST. GEORGE LAKE LEGGAT LAKE
NN
R
BENDER RD
DUCHARME RD
LONG LAKE MINNIE
CRON
ER
RTH
LN
N
UR
MCLEAN RD
K EE
AG W
RO
O
CR
B
"
ST M AR
ELBOW LAKE RD UE GUIG
CROSS RD
D
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY
LE
NR
IN
SH IB
YO TR
RD
$ +
D BA
U ST
HM ON
ON
N O’REILLY LAKE LN
SON RD
BABCOCK RD
RIC
LS
N LN
RD
D
R “D ON “c NN > ; " ) " J c " "
“>
STEELE
LN
ER RD
HA
SILVER LAKE
CA
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
CA
RD
EE RD
BR EW
"
c
SHARBOT LAKE
NE
D
Y LAKE ORIELL
LN
FOX RD
N
BLACK LAKE SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EM PIR E LN
BOBBY RD
NALD
HIGHWAY 7 "
W
TENA
AK ER
THOMP
RV E
WHITE LAKE
RD
ND
7
LAKE RD
CARNAHAN LAKE MCDO
DE
SL
LA
BR ES
RD W
D LN WES
NORTH
T EN
RD
LN
LD
BA S
BASS LAKE DUN
LOUDEN LN
RD
RD
CK
D
LONG LAKE
R
HARO
C RD
BR O
" c “M= J "
"
FRON
RIDGELAND RD
LN
NE BU R
ARDEN RD
"
BRADLEY RD
A ZE
D
BULL LAKE RD
SWAMP RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE L R IL
T LN SPOR
LN
G TR
PIT
ER
PH CLARK
N
RD
LIN E
BELL
RIM BERT
ND
EL
RD
DIN
B OE
PRICE RD
AM TH
WIN
E RD HORSESHOE LAKE DR BAY BIG
R LN
DAWSON RD
TH U
U SO
RRY LAK
R BA
RR IVE
D
BUCK LAKE RD COX
BULL LAKE
LN
BIG CLEAR LAKE C P LN
ARDEN
NR
ON LN
"
WILLETT
“J
" " “>
RO
JORD
PARKS RD
RD ER HAU CRANBE OM
E RD
ND
CK RD
ELM TRE
GE
ELM TREE
EEK LN
LR
TR TEALGARRISON LAKE
WALLBRIDGE LAKE
S RD HAYE
KED CR
SALMON RIVER
SE
N
CROO
KENNEBEC LAKE RI E HERON
L FA
YL KA
" G LN
WARRENS LAKE
WILKES LN
"
BLU
"
LE BAKER VALLEY RD
RD
TOWN LINE RD
DSON
BOLTON LAKES
IS
RY NG HU
RICH AR
MENT RD
BA YR
D
MINK LAKE
G RD
BURKE SETTLE
HUNGRY LAKE
ON ARMSTR
RD
" "
HENDERSON
RD
OW N
BORDENW OOD RD
UR
LN AY SB ALF UNKN
BU
RD VE L
EY
GU LL
RD
WILLIS
KI
VE
RTSV ILLE RD
ROBERTSVILLE
ROAD 509
LN
BIG
KO RK
SHINER RD
Y
" >
" "
DR
TL
N
MISSISSIPPI STATION
CROTCH LAKE
N LN "
LE
ROBE
S SHORE
SO AR C D YR LLE
YR
IT
RD
IL
OLD
HE
LN
BELL
BIG GULL LAKE
"
"
HENDERSON RD
WEDLO
D R
HR OC AR D
GU
BR O
U
Y LN LINDE
"
RD
RD GREER M LN FAR
EM
"
MILLERS LAKE
LEMKE LN COXVILLE
RD GULL LAKE LN
GULL LAKE " HARLOWE
"
" “>
SNOW ROAD STATION
QUEBEC LAKE
HARLOWE RD
KINGS LAKE
"
D
ER
FO
Q
HIT ES
CROTCH LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
E LN
PINE LAKE
RD
WINTERGREEN RD
BO
PE T
WIL
LN
IDA HIL
S LN
TOWE
AN
W
ARDOCH LAKE
"
"
ID
KE S
S KASH LAKE LN
E LAK
DONALDSON MORROW RD
"
LS
SPA
AUSTRIS RD LA
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
ST
LN
ANTOINE LAKE
M IL
KIN
D
G
OTTO
LN
R LN
SMITH RD
MA R
TR
MCVEIGH LN
LN
CANNON TL
AR ST T ES
RD
SH
R LN MANO WATK INS LN MALCOLM LAKE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
TH
SAGER LN
K” MA > KA "
WA SH " KA >
TR
E OAK RD CAV RS MYE
RD 3
U SO
MINKTRACK LAKE
BU
S
MUD LAKE RD
"
ARDOCH
D
"
BROWNS BAY LN
"
R RIVE
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
VAN S LA
"
RA
LN LS M IL
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
HR
N
RD
"
"
R FO
"
SUNDAY LAKE
OC
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
LN
NG
RD
PIN
HWY 41
RD HTS HEIG ZINAW S MA
RD
ADAM
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
"
RD 506
HEAD RD
E LAKE
SKOOTAMAT TA LAKE RD
STRUTH
SWAMP LAKE
LAKE LN
FERNLEIGH
" MARBLE LAKE
MYERS CAVE
OMPAH
D AR
NORWAY
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
" J " c "
ADDINGTON
ES
C
O NT
“=
“> " “> J " >
"
RD
O AN
ER RD
9
SHABOMEKA LAKE RD
"
CLOYNE
KE
RD
; " " )
NORTH RD
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
"
LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
" RD
ER
PALMERSTON LAKE
RD 50
SAND LAKE HR AC BE
SHABOMEKA LAKE LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
ID SN
LA
“D
BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
MARBL
"
JAM
" PLEVNA
" " J “>
" c
RD
LAKE
E
A LN
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
SAND
QU
SPRO
"
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
LS
MO S
D
LAKE RD
HIL KLIM
ER
LAK
FOLG
"
CANONTO
CANONTO LAKE
ER U YO
"
KISHKEBUS LAKE
RD
CRUISE RD
"
MOSQUE LAKE
41
OL
GRINDSTONE LAKE
E BAY RD
$ +
C AR
SUMMIT LAKE
"
LL
FAWN LAKE
BRASH LN
RD
MO U
KE LA
BIG LAKE
RD
NTA
E
"
"
M
"
BA Y
RD
UL
V
N
BR
O
TO ER
HA
FFIE LN
LUCKY LAKE
K
BRULE LAKE
EE N
D
N
NR
SCHOON
OW
"
GOVAN LAKE
HA AT
BUCKSHOT LAKE RD
BR
SS
"
"
"
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
RU
NORCAN LAKE
HE
SKEAD LAKE
TRAPPER LAKE
RN RD
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
RIVER STYX
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
;
" )
(outside Frontenac County)
CITY OF KINGSTON
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
Emergency Service
"
Library
"
Municipal School
TOWN OF GANANOQUE
BYRNE POINT BATEAU CHANNEL
Other Key Destinations
RD
RD
LL
LN
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
T RD
RD
LINE
RD
19TH
R LN
LINE
RD
LE MIL
18TH
LINE
Y LN IS BA
LINE
LEW
"
IE LN
16TH
ALAR
MCDONALD LN
POIN
17TH
IDAY
JOSLIN’S LN
LINE
RD
A IC
R’S
M A
DA
F
NA
O S
CA N
IT
ED
ST AT E
"
ER
EN TE
RD
U
3RD LINE RD
LINE
2ND LINE RD
"
RD POINT
WOLFE ISLAND
0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
Trails Concept Plan
OLL RD
"
"
13TH
RD
ETT
HOWE ISLAND
NE
RD
$ +
LN
KIE HOLL
BAYFIELD BAY
BUTTON_BAY
SON
E RD
LI 9TH
BENN
BA Y
ND RD
BIG SANDY BAY
Y RD ‘S BA
CARP
BU TT ON
EN STEV
12TH
RD
LA HIGH
RD
City of Kingston International Boundary
LINE
Y LN
E RIDG
E RD
E RD
S EA
10TH
95 WAY HIGH
REEDS BAY
LIN 4TH
LAKE ONTARIO
REED
OR H SH SOUT
ER RD WILM
E RD
95
E RD
$ +
Waterbody Wetland
LIN 7TH
E RD
RD
96 WAY HIGH
"
LIN 8TH
"
LIN 11TH
MARYSVILLE
96
LINE
E RD
$ +
LIN 9TH
"
BASE
Crown Land
" > " ;c " "
) " J “> "
"
" c "
= R
BOAT CHANNEL
T RD
D
7051
SIMCOE ISLAND
Provincial Park
POIN
LIN 5TH
Hamlet
PRINCE EDWARD BAY
MILE
GD
R ON
RD
NINE
TE R
E MM
Local Road
County of Frontenac Townships
WIN
LAN
SU
AMHERST ISLAND
Other
Parcel Property
RY
RY
Major Road
FE R
R FE
Highway
" ; " J )
NE RD
R RD FULLE
E IS LF
Road Network
RD
BASELI
E RD
WO
LF E IS
DR ISLAND
WO
HOW E
SHO "
NORTH
HEAD SPIT
Abandoned Railway Unknown Status of Railway
RE RD
R SID LOWE
Railways
DRISC
"
NORTH CHANNEL
Page 59 of 149
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC
BLACK DONALD LAKE
September 2014 NT OR
LN
HU
N
M
JUNIPER LAKE
TY MIS
WY
D
"
W
Y
MATAWATCHAN RD N
SH
RD
SKEAD LAKE
TT AG
E
DR
BU
RO
DR
"
J "
S
W
WE
ST
CO
PA L
RY LN
DODGE LAKE
CA
LN
"
ME RS TO N
IA
ND
A TC
N PL
HE
SUNSET STRIP
E AD
NO
L FO LA LN
DE
D
VICTO
OMPAH
±
TOWNSHIP OF GREATER MADAWASKA
ER LAK
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 10 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY FACILITY TYPE
PAR KH
"
TRAPPER LAKE
ROUND SCHOONER LAKE
ILL
NORCAN LAKE
LN
FORTUNE LAKE
ER
RD
RD
50
9
LONG SCHOONER LAKE
"
GOVAN LAKE
RIV
"
CLOYNE "
MACKIE LAKE CAMP LAKE
"
BRULE LAKE
41
“BIG OHLMANN LAKE
RD
LUCKY LAKE
ROUNDCAMP LAKE LN
RR
O
D
HY
LN
IN R
RD
OR
SE
REDHORSE LAKE
"
NTA
N TO ER
DH
LN
E "
K LA
D
HA
FF IE
RE
"
MO U
OV
NE
"
TOWNSHIP OF LANARK HIGHLANDS
OO
NCER RD
"
REID LAKE
H SC
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS BUCKSH OT LAKE RD
SPE
MAIR LAKE
SOUTH QUINN LAKE
"
DR
$ +
RUSS BROWN
"
"
"
BIG LAKE
RD M CH
LAKE RD
N
CRUISE RD
SUNDAY LAKE SPROULE LN
LN IN G LA
ND
"
"
T RD
ILB
UR
SH RD
RD
VAN S LA
W
S BU
SAND LAKE RD
"
RD
RD
LN
TL E
LA
HALL
KE
LN
LN
VE SIL
LN
AK
“HWAKAM
"
IN RM
R
RD ES
GE
UT
TTA
LN
CH
GUTHEINZ RD
SOUTH RD
W RD
ED
M IL
MARS
TU
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
ARDOCH LAKE
"
WATKI
NS LN
MALCOLM LAKE
AU S T MA R
KIN
SPA
RIS LA
LN
"
RD KE S
CROTCH LAKE KINGS LAKE TWIN ISLAND LAKE
IDE
LN
SAGER LN
WA G
ON
WH
"
EE
LL
MILLERS LAKE
" “>
S JE
N
SIE
K "
LA
ILL MM
SR
D
C
W
Y
AR
SO
N
TL
GULLEY
RD
"
A TR NQ
WHITES RD R
Y LN
BL AC
IT
K
D
UIL
NU
GU
LL
LA K
EL
N
BIG GULL LAKE
VE L
EY
RD
HARLOWE
SHORTS RD
OL
" S FORK
LN
D
R FA
M
LN
L BE
CH
AM
GR BE R
W
LN
10
EER
CROTCH LAKE
RD R MA
SH
VIE
W
DR
BELL LN
S SH
S NE JO N NL
MA LE CO DR OR E
"
DR
COXVILLE HE LN
L
"
L EN
N
ROBE
"
"
LN AY LID HO RD GE LOD
HENDERSON RD
GULL LAKE RD
"
EY LN LIND
NT LN
M
MISSISSIPPI STATION
"
"
RD
ROBERTSVILLE
AR D O
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC
RTSV ILLE
SHINER RD
QUEBEC LAKE
CHIMNEY POI
WINTERGREEN RD
“HARLOWE RD>
"
"
D ER
S KA
RD DELYEA
GE
SNOW ROAD STATION PINE LAKE
ER
MORRO
RIDGE LN
MANOR LN
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE
TO W
FORE ST LN
RD S CAVE MYER
CO
M
S KASH LAKE LN
N EL
"
RD
"
" LAKE TL
R FA
SMITH RD
N
RD
GG
LS
PL
ER
"
ARDOCH
AM SW
DONALDSON RD
DONALDSON
ARDOCH
BROWNS BAY LN
"
SNOW LN
LN
RIV
"
MINKTRACK LAKELYONS GATE LN
LN
D
LE MAP
"
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RD
RD 506
SR
MARBLE LAKE RD
WELLMAN RD
E
LITTLE GREEN LAKE
LN
"
RD
ER RM
N
ADAM
RA
HTS HEIG
S MAZ INAW ADDINGTON RD 4
STRUTH
HE
N
EL
"
MYERS CAVE MYERS CAVE
" J “> c " RD 3
SWAUGERS LAKE
OA K
R
SL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
ADDINGTON
ANTOINE LAKE
LAKE LN
TWIN
H HIG
K OC
PIN
GP IN
LN
IN TW
LN
C
LN
AR ST
O
KY
FL A
FLIELER LN
MISSISSAGAGON LAKE
R
CLOYNE
"
W OTTO
LAKE RD
HEAD RD
"
RD
NORWAY
N
SKOOTAMATTA
O NT
AgendaItem#6•
" "
“» J
"
NO
PLEVNA
FERNLEIGH
OAK RD
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
RD 509
OMPAH
CA
MUD LAKE
MCCAUSLAND LAKE
LN
International Boundary
PALMERSTON LAKE RD
D
SWAMP LAKE LITTLE SHABOMEKA LAKE
County of Frontenac Townships City of Kingston
KE
R
RD
Wetland Parcel Property
LA
"
D
E AK
RY
Waterbody
AL
ER
ER
K ME
NB
Crown Land
JAM
" " J “>
" c
R ES
; " " )
MO
"
E
LN
H RD NORT
L SA
Hamlet
"
MARBLE LAKE
SPENCER
QU
"
SHAWENEGOG LAKE
N
“RD
ID SN
Road Network Highway
LAKE LN
HIGGINS LN
YL BA
LEVERE RD
"
Major Road
SHAWENEGOG
SHABOMEKA LAKE
ER YD SN
Abandoned Railway Unknown Status of Railway
"
MO S
NG
KE
41
O AB SH
School
Railways
D
SAND LAKE D HR AC BE
LOWER MAZINAW LAKE
Other Key Destinations
ER
"
KISHKEBUS LAKE BON ECHO PROVINCIAL PARK
Key Community Desinations
Municipal
LA K
RD BUCKSHOT LAKE
"
Emergency Service
S ILL
U YO
MOSQUE LAKE
LA
41
Library
LN
KRINGS LN
$ +
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail
ES
AY
"
(outside Frontenac County)
Provincial Park
LA
KLIMA LN
Existing Off-Road Route
Local Road
E
D
D
UPPER MAZINAW LAKE
Existing Off-Road Route
Other
N TO
RR
N
H
Existing Conditions
= J 9 c
DS
RD
GE
SU
Trail Opportunities
HWY
Page 60 of 149
Legend
IN
L FO
"
CANONTO
PE T
RD BA Y E
“KE
GR
(outside Frontenac County)
PA YN
ER
SL
N
O
CANONTO LAKE
LL
C AR
GRINDSTONE LAKE
D LR
LY AL
"
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
LN
AT HA
SH N
RD
FAWN LAKE SUMMIT LAKE
Existing Off-Road Route
NS
KE LA
D EL R
BUCKSHOT LAKE
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route
SO
WOLFE LAKE
LE
JEW
HWY 41
" J " > c "
OR
E
U BR
RD
R PA
"
0 CH
RD
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
"
BE
LN
HE
BELL LN SS
HO
NL "
LE
"
ARDOCH RD
9 50
N
UNKN
CLA
RD
509
"
DU
A CH
RM
ER
N KL
LO
N LN
NE
RID
G
N EL
DE
IN LN
GARRET T RD
RE
ALL
RD
" MCNELL RD
ZIMMERMAN LN
"
RD
" LN
AH W IA
"
BR ES
"
E RD
CENTREVILL
E RD
TOBI N RD
RD
I LN LA
LN
NO
E
KE
CA
ER M IN
N RD
LN
Y IR
MUL VILL
RD
RD
DA
LN
GROUSE
LN
MIC
H
L AE
S
LN
DEVIL
"
ALPI
LAKE
RD SH
NE LN
TUNDRA LN C M
AN
D
R
IP
TO
EW
N
LN
A MC S
ND
RE
WS
RD
LN
TETT D
CR
"
±
R TH
"
D
"
BEC
ST
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES
BELKNAP LN
EN BA Y RD
FIREH
GE RD
BURNS RD
H OR ET S
GRE
LN
E LN
LN
BURRID
ES
BR IGGS C SPA
HILLCT
RD
LN
ER
OS DE Y
ER
T
LN
LA K
N
D LN
LN
LA
R SE
KS
RN
A MIC
NA R
S HO
LN N
RD NORTH
E BE
L ITT
"
SU N S
AM BE
EAS T
OO
L PO
PERO
W
KE
RD FOOT
TSP PO
AN LN COTM
LZ
"
RD HOWES LAKE
N
JAMES WILSO
SM E
CR
LD YN O
CRAIG
EL
RD
EY LN
R PE
LN
PICCADILLY
AIG
SE
"
G
RD
ROOKE
RD
RD
HINCHINB
A BDRY
Y
RT
RD
N NL
T RD FORTY FOO
RD GOODFEL LOW
O M O
"
E FR OD
RD
AR EN
PO ST
HOLS LN
N
R
MCNIC BROOKS LN
S
RD
RD
RY RD
DE
LN
AH IAW
HENRY LN
RO
RD
ER
A BD
RE
D
CK
LAKE
ER
O
SN ID
FIRST
EQ U LEV
LR
LN
LN
AR EN
CLAIR RD
BE L
MIL TO N
GODFREY
County of Frontenac Townships City of Kingston International Boundary
WE
NG
LN
N
POPLAR LN
RD
YO U
FORTY
RD
D
D
R
LAKE RD
E
SECOND
R
HA
NS
RON LN
O
LA
RL
CAME
O
E HIT
BUGSY
AR M
M
ATS RD
W
COLE LAKE
BR OW
NS RD
OAK FL
LN
D
OAK FLATS RD
GILES
WR
"
Y
"
C LO
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
Waterbody
CLOW
ERS RD
KE RD
STRUTH
ND LA
Crown Land
Wetland
PO
RTH RD NO RSON BU CK BA Y RD
LN LEE
EG A ROAD 38
RD KE
MOORE RD
OU
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
BYCROFT LN
O
SECO
R BU
NEW
LA WILKINS
Hamlet Provincial Park
N SU
ST. ANDREW LAKES
EC H
ON RD
"
W LN
LN
OC BALL RD
ROAD 38
E RD EC HO LAK
KE RD FOUR TH LA
LN R YE DW
DWYER RD
Local Road
Other
VE LN
BARR LN TIM S LN
KE
EN
D
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
Major Road
ST. ANDREW LAKES
RA G
C P LN
ER LAK
CHIPPEGO LAKE BREEN LN
SPARKS LN
RD
R LN
LFE
Abandoned Railway TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
HIC
HICKEY RD
LEA
WO
Railways
Highway
STEELE RD
RD BOBS
N NL LE A
RD YORK
D KE R RTH LA FOU
LN
RAYM O
Unknown Status of Railway
"
GRO
RAINBO
TERESA LN
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
D BA
"
LACK
LEO
LN
Y KE
RAILWAY ST
BIG C
D
"
" J
TR WIT
T
LN
C OX
LN
LN
EYE
D
DE
AN
S
NS
LN
UD
LIP
LL WA
D
SO
IL
W
"
LN
KR
LN
Other Key Destinations
EE
KS
PH
School
CR
HIC
ELBOW LAKE
ECHO LAKE
DUNCAN LAKE
EN
N
W
"
H FIS
NL
D
E
Municipal
RO
KR
NC
Library
HE
R YO
RD
RA
Emergency Service
KE LA
A BE
TH FIF
"
MAP LE
FIFTH DEPOT LAKE
Key Community Desinations
AW RD
LAKE
RD
EAGL
BR AD SH
TICHBORNE
AN DE
“SOUTH SHORE LN
J " c “PARHAM
“>
"
O BR
S RE
RAYMO RD
D
HO
FIFTH
RD
SH R
E MC
(outside Frontenac County)
LE
NEAD OW
AR VIL
RD
AR BU
RD
CRONK RD
WA G
EAGLE LAKE
SU G
"
ER
ALDER LN
ES
LAKE RD
GOOD RD
HO
EN
RS O
RD
CROW LAKE
T
IES LN
E TR
PIN
LE
ST
WAGNER RD
E RD
UE
N MA
EAGLE LAKE MINN
ROCK LAK
Q
"
"
SUCKER LAKE
"
N
CROW LAKE LN S TE PAT ALF
E LAKE
SMITH RD
RVIL
ST H AB ET
D
"
LN
S RD
"
LN
CROW LAKE RD
DUCHARME RD
RD
WELLY
WA GA
TT
EL IZ
D
N
N EN
OO
LEGGAT LAKE
"
RD IN YOUNG
HO
YW LL
ELM
RD
ST. GEORGE LAKE
ROCK LAKE
HANNA
Y
RD
ALMOND LN
EE RD
LE
D SHARBOT LAKE SHARBOT LAKE
LEE RD
TRYON RD
R
RD
(outside Frontenac County)
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Rideau Heritage Trails Rideau Heritage Trails
RE
AR
CLEMENT RD
IB SH
RD
ER
RD
ARDEN
H LN
MIDDLE RD
LA KE
N
RD
BR AS
AG W
ER
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY ARMSTRONG
GU ELBOW LAKE D IG ER IGU UE GU RD
UR
Existing Off-Road Route
SILVER LAKE
O
NK
; " )
" J " c “>
" "
ST W
7
CROSS RD
RD ON TH O
FOX RD
M CL
PIT
EA N
RD
RD
SE E
MP S
B
LONG LAKE
CRO
K
"
D BA
MCLEAN RD
Y
DIC
AgendaItem#6•
RO
" O N CR
S
RD
RD
N
N
EN
DL
O
AR D
LN
LN
BRASH LN
EEK
"
RD
CR
HM ON
G
W BR E
BREW ER RD
TRYON RD BENDER RD
NEADOW RD
Page 61 of 149
B STU
O’REILLY LAKE LAKE LN
E
NG
ELG RIC
N AN
RD
RD
AK
BABCOCK RD
$ +$
D
" “c
LN
L AT
C
AN
GG
CO
LO
R
"
c
; " " J “) c “>
" "
SHARBOT LAKE ER RD
LE
B BA
BR EW
RD
AC
ORIELLY
D KR
D
SHARBOT LAKE
N
NT EN
LN
LN
NC
LN
D
N
L
RD ON NN CA T S T SHARBOT LAKE ET RR A G
CR
RV E
A ZE
AN
DP IT L
NALD
FR O
R
DIN
RD
SA N
MCDO
D
(outside Frontenac County)
" c " c
G
AD RO
ELIJ
ELIJAH RD
FANNING LN
ON
DU
E
HA
BOBBY RD
CARNAHAN LAKE
D
LS
RIDGELAND RD
NE
STON RD JOHN
RK R
"
D
W
HES HUG
CLA
Existing Off-Road Route
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
AH
W LE
N NL
LEWIS
BO LT O
RD
D
SS R
D
7
SHARBOT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK PIR
RIM LN BERT
LN
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
Parcel Property
A ZE
RD
KR
EM
B
BASS LAKE
Existing Off-Road Route
Road Network
RD
IS
NG
RD
RY D YR BER R
HU ARDEN RD
RD OOD E NW BOR D
BULL LAKE RD
C BR O
D
A TEN
DR
RD
Existing Conditions
= J 9 c
BLACK LAKE
MILL RD
LAKE RD ASS "
RD BASS LA KE c “M FERGUSON J RD "
"
LONG LAKE RD
R
HA N LA
HE TT MA
"
ER RD
BLU E
BRADLEY RD
MOUNTAIN GROVE ILL R
DE
T PI
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route
HAROLD RD
CLARK RD
ER
AC C E
WHITE LAKE
"
E RD
FALL RIV
CK
SWAMP RD HW AY 7
BELL LIN
RD LINE
D
O BR
HIG
FOX RD
GT R
Legend Trail Opportunities
BELL
YR
LN
B
N EL
PRICE RD
RD
D
DIN
T LN SPOR
N FRO
WIN
PR ICE
DAWSON RD
RD
HORSESHOE LAKE R D CRANBERRY LAKE RD R TO AS
NB O
OE PH
LN
ER
RD
R AM TH
AU
LN
P
RD
ND
EN
C
TH U
AG
U SO
MH
"” “>J “>
ARDENRBIG CLEAR LAKE
COX RD
GARDINERS RD O BO
WILLETT
RD
COX RD
BULL LAKE LAKE
O CK
BUCK LAKE
ON LN
K RD
BU LL
RD
O DC
D
JORD
NORTH
LN
"
WARRENS LAKE
LOST LN
WO
NR
ELM TREE
TREE
RO
S RD HAYE
WEDLOC
"
ARDEN RD
TG WALLBRIDGE LAKE AT E RD
ND
7 AY HW
ELM ES
EEK
C
KINGSTON LINE RD
CO
GARRISON LAKE TEAL TR
LN
GE
HIG
W
CR KED
RIDGELAND RD
Y KA
CROO
MACDONNELL RD
TOWN LINE RD
Y KA
TOWNSHIP OF ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS
KENNEBEC LAKE BLUE HERON RI
RON RI
BEBRIS RD
"
TAMAR ACK TR
D
BLUE HE
NORT H RD
SALMON RIVER
LN
RD
EMENT RD
BA YR
D
BURKE SETTL
BOLTON LAKES
NR
D
D ON
N RD
MINK LAKE
RD LLEY WY R VA BAKE TURNER
RE N
CLARENDON RD
CROS
UNKNOW
N
OW N
SO
NR
DR
D
GAYLORD RD
YL BA
ER
DS O
DS
RD
HUNGRY LAKE
ND
H AR
OO
CR
YL BA FS AL
DSON RD RIC
CH
R
S ALF
HE
RICHAR
EW
ON
" “=
HENDERSON
KO
RD
LN
VE
RD
BORDENWOOD RD
K
AG
GO
KIR
GU LL RD
AR D O
LN
RD EY VE L
AR DOCH BIG
VIL L
RD
"
" c
"
HENDERSON RD
RTSV ILLE
"
"
LN
ROBE
RD
“S FORK
7 AY HW
DR
OD
N
DR
RE
WIN
O DW
D RD
W
7
9
AM
HIG
"
$ +
50
H LC
RD
LN
M
N EL
SHORTS RD
SHARBOT LAKE
RD
SHINER RD
G
LA K
TL
GE
GULL LAKE RD
U LL
R FA
D OL
LOD
"
"
MOSQUITO LAKE PKY
EY LN LIND
NT LN
N
"
"
LEMKE LN H PINE PAT
RD
CHIMNEY POI
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC
GREER RD
ROAD 509
LN
"
HARLOWE RD
KASHWAKAMAK LAKE RD
Y
WINTERGREEN RD
SO
FITZGERALD
HWY 41
ITE S
AR
38
IT
September 2014
C
ROAD
WH
UIL
41
N
RD
"
"
NQ
$ +
LL
"
A TR
RD DELYEA
EE
GULLEY
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN "
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC " RD 506
WH
LE Y
FORE ST LN
S CAVE
VE SIL
LN
509
MYER
ER
" “>
"
"
AD
OAK RD
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 11 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY FACILITY TYPE
ON
ZEALAN
WA G
S KASH LAKE LN
LN
MCVEIGH LN
INE RM
SH IB
TO W
POLAR BEAR LN
RD
MISSISSIPPI RIVER
RO
" J “> c "
ABRAMS LN
0 CLEAR LAK
E RD
2.5
"
5
10 Kilometres TAG
"
T LN GAR
R MC M
O NA ST D 38
LN
RD
VER
R OA
ILT ON
DR
W
LE MA P
BELKNAP LN
DR EY DAV
W
DR IE LE YV
RD
ST
" “c c
MCCALLUM LN SHALLOW LN
GE OR
“>
"
"
"
"
"
TAG
"
LN AS
LN H MIS CO MA C
LN
AS M
LE
Y
RD
SA
AU SS
GA
DE
ER
VA L
YE N FR
AN LN
"
SEAP
LN T IN PO RN
T
L BI
LY
G
R
N EE
OINT
LN
RD
IT SPL
HINGE LAKE
RD
LIV
GIL
YR RA
T LN GAR
RD
D
O
PIN
IC
O
N
INIC
ON
RD FFIC TO
E
R AIL
RD
OPINICON LAKE LAKE OPINICON OPINICON LAKE LN TE GA HART HART LAKE LAKE
S PO
RD
CROW LAKE LOWER ROCK LAKE
CROW CROWLAKE LAKE
LOWER ROCK LAKE
HIN FIS
KE LA
G
RD
DE N
LN
KE LA G HIN FIS FISHING LAKE
RD
BR A D
"
AR
H NU
DON MO
FO
RD
DOG LAKE LA
ST AF
ILLS
RD
UR
ORE LN
A
CA R
RYIN
LAC
"
GP
ER
D
RID
E
R AU
LN
LITTLE CRANBERRY LAKE D
LN
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
LN
DOG LAKE
NT H
LN
S
RD
LN
CH
LN HIDEAWAY
OR M SBEE RD TVIE W LN
CRANBERRY LAKE CRANBERRY LAKE LN
RID
NA
LL
N
GE
CA
BREWER LAKE SUNBUR Y RD
D RD
RD
EVEL
WASHBU
RN RD
SONN
RN RD
AL LN
DOG LAKE
DOG LAKE
FACT ORY
BATT ERSE
H ILL
A RD
"
WASHBU
A TB UN
HILLS
CATARAQUI RIVER (RIDEAU CANAL)
±
D
T RD
E RS
RD
ABERNA THY RD
SU NBUR Y RD
WES
DIN
"
J
ID
S RD
H
"
RE
SAND
MILBURN RD
SUNBURY
CESS
E TT BA
LLIN "
" GTON ST
" c
BEAC
RD
PR IN
D
BU R
WE
CA R
ER RO
SA
R ND S
BA S
CRANESNEST LAKE BU RNT
H LN
N
BATTERSEA
LAKE RD
RD
LN
S RD
NL
RAM PART
C
A LE
MILBU
LE LN
UND
MP AR TS
RN RD
M EX AL
INVERARY LAKE INVERARY LAKE
MCG ARVE Y
DR
RA
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
LN
RIS
LN
UND
D LA
RO KE RD
COLLINS LAKE COLLINS LAKE D DR FIEL
LAKE
Y LE
TRAVERSE TRAVERSE LAKELAKE
HORSESHOE HORSESHOE LAKE LAKE
HA R
RD
BEAC
ND
ROUND LAKE
ES RD LD
; “J ) “> "
SYNDENHAM
PARKER POINT LN
RIS TM
ITH
EN KO
PEBB
R
D ER
DUFF
RD
ROUN
"
"
INVERARY
ON RD
LAK EFIE
E
LN
POLLYWOG LAKE
CH
EAN SM
LN
BUCK POINT LN HOLM
RD
"
BU
C D MA
IDA
DAVI DS
NU
GE
MULVILL
ASHWOOD DR
WS
MORGAN DR
E RD
BR ES
VA L
EE RD
RE
E AV
RD
STAGE COACH RD
RD
HANNA
RD E LE
SH OR T ST
RD GE RID BU R
S
RD
RD
UR
RD
"
RD LATI MER RD BOYS OLD
DR EK RE ER C DE
ROOST LN
N AY L KB
N
TH OR
O SH
GREENF IELD RD
ARTH
E LN
RD ON IDS DAV
RD
EW
ND
OP
L VA
H RD
RD
ON
A MC
D
BREWERY ST RUTLEDGE RD
RD CAMPBELL
LN
EE N
S OW RR
"
LATIM ER
“HOLMES RD
DIX
R
N
AN
FO
DEVIL LAKE
BUCK BUCK LAKE LAKE
D
" c
RD
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
MAPL RED
LN BAY
N
LN
R PERT H RD
WALS
N
PER
"
E RD
RD
ISO N
O
HT SL
R LEAF
LELA
IX
KN IG
D BE
L RT PO
LN
LN
RD D
"
PER TH
LN
R BE
TT ER
TR
RD
ND
-D
HA R
S DR
CR
R ME
LELA
M ER
RD
RD
E
D
TO
PERTH ROAD
IL
HOGAN
ST
UPPER ROCK LAKE UPPER ROCK LAKE
W
Y RD
NH A MR
DALE
LIF
LE MAP
PERT H RD
WIL
WILMER
WILM ER RD
D
SH EI
LA LN
RET REA T LN
SYD E
SHALES RD
ER LA
RD BENJAMIN
SP R INDIAN LAKE IN G M NORW AY RD IL L LN
RD
ID FS
AN
IP
"
"
MCFA DDEN
LN
RD
RD BAY
ORD
"
DRAP
LN
SILLS
BEDF
O
KE RD
STONESS LN SHALES LN DARLING LAKE DRAPER LAKE DRAPER LAKE
O’NEIL ELEY
TO
NA
LN BU SC H
RD
"
ALTON RD EAST
ST
CEDARWOOD
RD
BA C
"
SLIDE LAKE
SOUTH OTTER LAKE DOE LAKE
LN
LN
L YE FR
BUCK LAKE
"
ND
CITY OF KINGSTON
CENTREVILL
R LAKE RD
LABELLE LAKE E L LE LN YE FR NORM
LA
International Boundary
OC
KE E
NO
LN
RE
City of Kingston
LR
T PO
E RD
HA
GES
NE LN
BIGCLEAR CLEARLAKE LAKE BIG
O M
RID
L BE
DE
D KR
LA
LN
CA
CLEA
LITTLE CLEAR LAKE LITTLE CLEAR LAKE
LN
E
RD
LN
AR
ALPI
TUNDRA LN
BIRCHLAKE LAKE BIRCH
D
D KE
LN
S
SH
DEVIL LAKE
D
RD
MOR R
C
GA
LEE RD
GE RD
BURRID
GARRET T RD
RD BA Y EN RE G
RD FITZGERALD
KE LA
N M IN ER
EL AK RL
MIN E
EL
KINGSFORDLAKE LAKE KINGSFORD
O
EY E
SU M AC RD BU R E
ND
LN T IN PO A
MIC BURNS RD
LN H OR ET S SU N S
LN RE S HO EAS T
LN ER LZ SM E
HA
O
FO
LN
YR
LE
SO
SA N
ER AN DE
ES
LA S BO B
BU CK BA Y RD
LN SE RO
MIC
W W O AR R
LN TT
RE
EV E
ETT LN EVER
RD DALE ROSE
ST
“RAILTON
Parcel Property
Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
LN
"
"
SPAFFORDTON
SYD E
T RD
LE
D RD
NEW
RD
H RD
R ES
LS
RUT LED GE
KEE LE
; " )
COAC
D FO
RAIL TON
STAG E
SR
RD
MUL VILL
T WA HIA
ON RD MURT
OW
RAIL TON
GROUSE RD
RD
LAKE
LN
FELL
RD
CE D
County of Frontenac Townships
IA
Y IR
EEL LAKE
DESERT LAKE KE RD E LA CANO
CRONK LAKE
RG
CHRISTIE LAKE DEVIL
"
FRONTENAC PROVINCIAL PARK BIG SALMON LAKE BIG SALMON LAKE
D BE
BU L
O GE
"
E
RID
RD
D
LAN
SON
SYDENHAM LAKE SYDENHAM LAKE
LAM BER T RD
EAST MUR VALE R
INN RD
"
BOTTING RD ANKER LN
WHEATLEY
N
E RD
WIL
"
EFOR HOLL
RD
MORI N
RD
RD KEN
IL TO D
ST
WOLFE LAKE WOLFE LAKE
POPLAR LN
C M
DESERT LAKE
"
RD
AH W IA
RD
BL
FLO
R D EA
; " ) “> J " “>
““c " SYDENHAM c "
RD " ELL “= AMPB
ED G
ES
ILW AY
ITH RD OW SM
" c
TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES
NORTH OTTER HOLLEFORD LAKE HOLLEFORD NORTH OTTER LAKE LAKE LAKE
BDRY
H PO
ALTO N
JAM
EEL LAKE
TIN LN
MAN
" LN
DA
LN
NO
"
FREE
HBO
OW SM ITH RD
N RD
SYDENHAM LAKE
LOUG
HARR
CANOE LAKE CANOE LAKE
"
KNOWLTON LAKE
RTLA ND
RD
ROUG
EST
HARROWSMITH "
" “>
SC AN
GORR
AR
N RD
BUGSY LN
NORTH OKE RD INBRO HINCH
CREEK LN
RD LY’S WIL
JAMIE SON
I LN
MINER LAKE
LN
D ER OK
RD
" c
TOBI N RD
L PO
HARR
RA
E ST
D
ZIMMERMAN LN
LITTLE SALMON LITTLELAKE SALMON LAKE
KNOWLTON LAKE
"
AH IAW
DR
RD
COLEBROOKE
MAPLE DR
LONG POND LAKE
ES LN
T QU
RD
S
S AK BL
Crown Land
Wetland
LN BUCK BAY
T RD FORTY FOO
RD GOODFELLOW
LN MS
RD W
RD
ERSO
DIT H LN
Provincial Park
Waterbody
N EG A RD
RD
D R N O M O TE LN
KE LN ES LA
DOUCET
HOW
AD 38
38 RO
JAMIE SON
"
WOLFE LAKE WOLFE LAKE
GENG
"
SAN
"
GARTER LAKE
ROSE LN
LN
"
JON
WES
JAMES WILSO PERO
RO INB
D RD
UVEN RD
ROAD ST
" c " c
NOTR
D
KE RD
R
N
VANL
ALTO N
KE
TOWNSHIP OF LOYALIST
Hamlet
O ILT
RD
EFOR
RD
GE DR
LAKE POTSPOON LAKE N POTSPOON
AN LN COTM
GOULD LAKE GOULD LAKE
CH HIN D
K RD RBEC
ORT H RD
C
N RD
BAUD ER DR
N
YR
N RD Q UA R R
"
NEW
D
M
RE CR
MCC O
QUIN
LA K
CK FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE FOURTEEN ISLAND LAKE DU OD WO
HOLL
RD
RT
NL
POLI LN
THIRTY ISLAND LAKE HOLS LNWHITE LAKE
D ER
"
W
BR A C
D LL R
RD
T ER ES
" MCNELL RD CNELL R
RD
GRAHAM RD
POND LILY LAKE
YO THIRTEEN ISLAND DE THIRTEEN ISLAND LAKE LAKE LN RD S OS EK DE Y BE
JOHN MAR
“= " J "
PETW
RD
OO
RD
NORTH SHO
KER
R YA
Other
AN L
RUTL
NNE
YAR
BROO
MCLE AN R
WAL LACE RD
W
Local Road
FFM
PO ST
TSP PO
N
SANGSTER LAKE
N EL LA K MER FFY E BU
HARTINGTON
ORT H RD
EST
HEND
Highway
STRUTH
"
E RD
ELLE
DW
RD
Road Network Major Road
RD
D
ST OR
BA NK VE RO ST NA ST
SILVER
E DAME
OKE
RD R
PETW
BOYC
WAT SO
R RD KER
AD FO
Other Key Destinations
Unknown Status of Railway
DR
Y
RD YORK
PONDLILY LAKE PONDLILY LAKE
WOLF E SW AMP RD
BRO
WAL LACE RD
Abandoned Railway
RD
IG
HOWES LAKE KE RD RT LA DESE
“VERONA LAKE
LN ROCK HAMBLYLAKE LAKE HAMBLY
COLE
Railways
A CR
RD
ND RD
Library Municipal
Y
HU
DA VE
GS LON
WES T BR
W
RT
ALL
NA
"
"
ALTON RD WEST
AgendaItem#6•
COLE
NEW
BYCROFT LN
LN
D RD
KE
INT
RD
(outside Frontenac County)
FOR
LA
WE EL
H PO
GERMAN
"
School
RE DF
S
NA SA
"
BR AD
E HIT
HENRY LN
MCNIC BROOKS LN
RD
LD YN O RE
ND RD
"
" “c
"
NA SA VERO
VERO
NAPANEE NAPANEE LAKE LAKE
PETWORTH
Emergency Service
CLOW
ERS RD
NS RD BR OW
LAKE RD SECOND
RD QUE
RD
LEVE
KE
VANLUVEN LAKE VANLUVEN LAKE
RD
Key Community Desinations
= J 9 c
RD
LA
ST FIR D PR
RD
GO
"
RD
"
WA M
CK
LN
NH A MR
ON RD E RD MOOR MARY
RO
MIL TO N
"
CRAIG
MILLER
(outside Frontenac County)
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
STEELE RD
RD KE
N NL LE A OC
E RD EC HO LAK
KE RD FOUR TH LA
LN R YE DW
WILKINS
LN
VERONA
RD
Existing Off-Road Route
HA
O TP ES
NG
FIREH
RD
THIRTY ISLAND LAKE YO U
BURRIDGELAKE LAKE BURRIDGE GREE N BA Y RD
LN
HARROWSMITH
RD
Y ST
BELL
GERMAN
Page 62 of 149
(outside Frontenac County)
RD
A BDRY
RD
Existing Conditions LONG SWAMP
LN
BIRC
Existing Off-Road Route
LN
S LN
LN
CE SPA
E
WHEATLE
Existing On-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route
Existing Off-Road Route
COLE LAKE
ATS RD
"
BOBS LAKE
VER O
D
KE
LN
BR IGG
ER LAK
T LA
BELLROCK
Existing On-Road Route
ER
L
ITT RD
LFE
Trail Opportunities
RD
SN ID
FIRST DEPOT LAKE
S FIR
E HIT
DEW
N
AK
"
T
PINE RID
WO
RD
AM BE
L ITT
RON LN
K
GILES
S
W
HILLCT LN
BOBS LAKE BOBS LAKE
WHITE LAKE
LN
D
OC
W
"
E AK
RD
BUGSY
AR EN
RD
CA
ER
LR
Legend
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
OAK FL
SN IDER
RD CLAIR RD EQ U LEV
BE L
TIM S
W
MOORE RD
"
CLAIR
BOBS LAKE BARR
THIRD DEPOT LAKE
"
RN BU
DE
LN
TL
YS
" c
CAME
D
AN D
RTH RD NO
LAKE BOBS
EAGL
RD
LN
R
N
ST. ANDREW LAKES
N SU
EY LN
BANK ST
T
Y
E
Y
EA S
D
AN
AR M
R
EL
KE
W LN
ST. ANDREW LAKES
SECOND DEPOT LAKE
O
HIC
HICKEY RD
N
TR WIT
UD
LE
VE LN
RAINBO
TERESA LN TERESA LN
BALL RD
GRO
BOBS LAKE
LN
RL
DE
SO
"
OU
LACK
LN
LN
LN
D BA
R SE DE
BOBS LAKE BOBS LAKE
"
LN
EYE
"
VERONA
R LN
LN
S RE
LL WA
D
KS
S
NS
HO
KR
HIC
LIP
LN
EE
E
IL
W
"
EN
CR
NC
PH
W
DUNCAN LAKE
N
"
MAP LE E MC
"
H FIS
RA
R
L ON
FOURTH DEPOT LAKE
O
AW RD
RD
BR AD SH
STEELE RD
RD
“SOUTH SHORE LN
O BR
ES
RAYMO RD
D
OU BAD
NOTRE DAME ST
RD
WELLY
SH R
MUD BAY BOBS LAKE
TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY BOBS LAKE
ROAD 38
AR BU
J " “c
“>
"
ELBOW LAKE
ECHO LAKE
M
ALDER LN
PIN
RD
TOWNSHIP OF CENTRAL FRONTENAC
TOWNSHIP OF STONE MILLS
LN
REVELL RD
LE
SU G
RSON
EAGLE LAKE
RD LAKE
AR VIL
HE
DWYER RD
GE
RD
SMITH RD
IES LN
RD
WA G
CHIPPEGO LAKE BREEN LN SPARKS LN
RID
UR
MINN
LONG
NK
A BE
T FIF
AK HL
NE
O
LONG LAKE
CRO
FIFTH DEPOT LAKE D ER
LO
UL
"
CROW LAKE CROW LAKE
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC September 2014
NN
GR
BE
RD
KE
BIL LY
Y
LA
RD
RO
OW
LAKE
N
CR
IDA HI LL RD
DL
LN
RD
HM ON
ON
LOW
LN
EEK
S TER PAT ALF
NR DN OR TH DP IT L N
CR
NEAD OW
B STU
E LAKE
RD
"
"
D BA
MCLEAN RD
N RD
PIT
LN
YORK
AR DE
Trails Concept Plan
MAP 12 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY FACILITY TYPE
LEGGAT LAKE
DUCHARME RD
K RD
BRASH LN
BABCOC RIC
BEAR CR
EEK RD
RIVER STYX
RIVER STYX
0
2.5
5
10 Kilometres
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN TOWNSHIP OF FRONTENAC ISLANDS
"
TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS
September 2014
"
CITY OF KINGSTON
BYRNE POINT
HO
HOWE
MMER RY SU FER WOLF E IS
THOUSAND ISLANDS
"
TP
OIN
T
H OW
"
DR
LN
D LAN E IS
DR
LIGHTHO
S EA
RD
GOOD FRIEND TE R
COLL
WIN
DRIS
ER RD
DE RD
"
" " ; " J
)
E RD
ER SI
BASELIN
"
FULL
LOW
RY
E RD
DR
FE R
ER RD
DE RD
BASELIN
ISLAN D
LF E IS
HOWE
WO
FULL
AD
RD
ER SI
E ITH SP
D
ES
NORTH SHORE RD
LOW
E ITH SP
R AD
RT HS
LEAVIS SHOR
"
NO
"
RE
IS FERR Y
RD
Trails Concept Plan
±
MAP 13 - PROPOSED ROUTES BY FACILITY TYPE
USE LN
13TH
LN
LINE
LN
H
LN
RIB
UG
NE’S
MCFADDEN LN
RD
LEO
C OVE
19TH
RD
N
LINE
LINE
RL
LANE
LN ORY HICK
20TH
18TH
LE MIL
RT’S
JOSLIN’S LN
RD
15TH LINE RD
C OR
NA
LINE
RD
LN AY
RD
IS B
LINE
"
KY
GH
LINE
LEW
T LN
BR EA
LOU
Y RD ‘S BA
16TH
POIN
15TH
SURE
LN 17TH
RD
TH SH
LN
LIM
MUR PHY’S
IE AR AL
RD O RE
D LN
RD
T RD
LINE
LN
RD
NE R
AgendaItem#6•
LINE
LI 9TH
ST
D
Y RD ‘S BA
IN T RD
RD
A IC AM
ER RD
F O
NA
DA ETT
CA
BENN
IT
ETT
BA Y
UN
BU TT ON
ED
BENN
RD
K LA KE R D
HIGH
DR LAN
R’S PO
"
RD
LN
EN TE
RD
LINE 8TH
RD
Y
GE
BLAC
S EA
CARP
S
REED
ST AT E
Y RD ‘S BA
KYLE
LINE 5TH
RID
N
LN
TH ABE ELIZ
RD
RD
Key Community Desinations
YL
R RD
LINE 8TH
AY 95 HIGHW
LINE 5TH
(outside Frontenac County)
S EA
POIN
ON A
D
D
D
Existing Off-Road Route
REED
Conservation Area, Provincial Park, Ministry of Natural Resources or North Frontenac Parklands Trail
Library
IDAY
WY
R LN
EN’S
12TH
HOLL
NE R
WOLFE ISLAND
95
(outside Frontenac County)
Emergency Service
HARBOU
HEL
RD
RD
LI 9TH
D
LN
STUA
RD
R LINE
NE R
R LIN E
BASE
WILME
LL
NAL
KIE
MCD O
AN RD
GRANDE
RD
LINE
HIGHWAY 95
ST. LAWRENCE RIVER
12TH
LINE
4TH LINE RD
RD
96
11TH
3RD LINE RD
N’S
AY 96 IGHW
SOU
LINE 7TH
2ND LINE RD
COTTAGE
LINE RD
RD
"
95
Existing Off-Road Route
Municipal
GA
HOG
H WAY HIGH
$ + $ +
LI 4TH
3RD
D
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route
= J 9 c
T RD
D
2ND LINE RD
Existing Conditions
BA
T RD
DU
PLEA
Existing Off-Road Route NE R SE LI
"
NE R
RRY
Page 63 of 149
Existing On-Road Route Existing On-Road Route Existing Off-Road Route
7051
LI 7TH
IS FE
Trail Opportunities
"
POIN
POIN
LINE
C OE
Legend
"
OAK
OAK
10TH
96
SIM
IL
RD
ELIZA ST “J ; "
“) " “> c “MARYSVILLE
" c " "
=
RD
96
O’S LN
$ +$
LINE
IN
WALD
PO
10TH
AS
G ST
LU C
LN ITE
POIN
"
WH
LN
ILE
N TL
GOIN
E’S
EM
RD
51
N EV
EM
T RD
LN
LINE 9TH
RD 70
‘S L
NIN
INT
HORE BAYS
RD
MILL POINT LN
SIMCOE ISLAND O EP
51
RD
E EV
NIN
11TH
N LN
RD 70
U SO
Y JO
G FER
RD
$ + $ +
D
BUTTON_BAY
BUTTON_BAY
School Other Key Destinations
Railways
V STE
ON EN S
LN
Abandoned Railway Unknown Status of Railway
Road Network Highway Major Road Local Road
Other Hamlet Provincial Park Crown Land Waterbody Wetland Parcel Property County of Frontenac Townships City of Kingston International Boundary 0 Base GIS Data provided by the County of Frontenac.
1.25
2.5
5 Kilometres
AgendaItem#6•
Appendix A
PIC Summary Notes
Trails Concept Plan
Page 64 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan May 26 Public Open House Summary Draft
To:
Anne Marie Young
Date:
June 04, 2014
From:
Jonathan Loschmann, MMM Group
Job No.:
1613108-001-T01 Peter Young Kevin Farrell Dave McLaughlin John Grieve TAC Members
Subject:
County of Frontenac – Trial Concept Plan Summary of Public Open House
CC:
Presenters: Frontenac/TAC Team: Anne Marie Young, County of Frontenac (AY) Allan McPhail (AM)
MMM Group Study Team: Jonathan Loschmann (JL) John Grieve (JRG)
On May 26, 2014, a Public Open House was held at the Lion’s Club in Verona to display work to date and to receive critical input from the community. The table below summarizes questions and comments made by members of the public and various stakeholders present. The event was attended by more than 25 people. Representatives from the County of Frontenac, TAC, as well as MMM Group were present to provide introduction, discussion, formal presentation, and a 1-hour workshop. Anne-Marie Young introduced the project and provided overview of the project, followed by remarks by Allan McPhail on behalf of the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC). Jonathan Loschmann of MMM delivered a presentation detailing the project overview followed by a moderated workshop (see also PDF of presentation attached). The event was held between 6:30PM-9:30PM. Progress materials presented to TAC in the proceeding Information Centre packet were displayed on foam boards and easels for review and ‘redline’ by members of the public and to capture comments of various discussions. Summary Item
- Heart and Stroke Foundation
Discussion from the Floor WORKSHOP The Heart and Stroke Foundation was mentioned by a member of the public as a relevant organization to the Trails Concept Plan – and should consider as the plan evolves – re: the promotion of active transportation and healthy lifestyles.
- Equestrian Use
Mention was provided regarding the prospect of Equestrian use as a consideration for future trail use and to strengthen a broader range of multi-use trail users. Concerns regarding Operations and Maintenance were raised. It was noted that ‘trail’ may be misleading if/when discussion of-road facilities. Discussion regarding the semantics was raised for consideration in future naming of documents and routes. ‘Trails’ for the purposes of this study include ‘all’ facility types including opportunity for on-road and off-road facilities, active and motorized uses. Consider ‘routes’. It was noted that the project must not look at County trails ‘in a bubble’, but that the context and surrounding/neighbouring trails initiatives must be considered and elaborated on in future Trail Concept plan works – and to look at surrounding Counties. The economic drivers of trails must be considered for the Concept Plan.
‘Trails’ – definition
Context of Trail Network
Economic Drivers
1
Trails Concept Plan
Page 65 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
- Mapping - GIS
- Elbow Lake
Consider use of GIS to aid in the development of village walking tour routes. Elbow Lake, K+P, and Grenville/Leeds were mentioned as components/connections.
- Paddling
Consider connections to ‘water sports’ and related trail opportunities and tourism opportunities. Notably Gananoque to Algonquin. Bruce Peninsula - Mentioned as a notable ‘tourism’ precedent v. trails, notably the promotion and relationship of B&B’s and ‘tours’, including shuttle drop-offs and pickups from trail/water/tourism destinations. Infrastructure in support of trails should be considered. Important to continue (K+P) up to Calabogie. The opportunities of ‘rails to trails’ is a ‘once in a lifetime’ opportunity and should not be ‘missed’. Make a statement – don’t lose the opportunity. Noted as having spectacular trails – and should be looked at as a desirable precedent, including for 4x4s and snowmobiles. A major tourism draw. OFSC a positive influence and organization. Locally has seen a 20%++ revenue stream over past year. Trails should have a variety of options. Concern is raised that some are losing out because of OFSC enhancements to trails in their community. The perceived need for more local and accessible starting points (trailheads), including space for snowmobile trailers and parking is discussed. It is noted that snowmobiler’s are ‘leaving’ the county to ride trails elsewhere due to access restrictions locally. This item also is raised as a matter of high importance and need at various other points of the workshop. More trails for ATVs is a good thing. Questions and discussion regarding access restrictions due to ownership considerations is discussed. Opportunity for ATVs north of Verona is discussed later in the meeting as a specific opportunity. O+M of the K+P north of Sharbot Lake outside of the villages is noted as requiring work. North of Snow Road and Cottage Road is discussed. Algonquin to Adirondacks trail is discussed and put into context relative to initiatives of the Trans Canada Trail. Rideau Trail has been involved in this in the past. The ‘Ato-A’ is used as a notional trail by paddling and hiking groups. 1,000 Islands National Park is mentioned. It is noted that it is the County’s duty to ‘sell the spirit of trails’ Gap’ in trail network existing is noted Harrowsmith to Sharbot Lake in the K+P. It is noted that the KFL+A is working to enhance community health and the benefits of trails including building new connections and bridges. New staff hires for the next three (3) years are active and will aid in bringing these initiatives to fruition. Walkable connections to schools are a discussed immediate priority. Loyalist City and Kingston, and Lake Ontario Trails initiatives should be considered. It is noted that the County should get the N/S (K+P) completed as high immediate priority. Then ‘do the others’. To Hwy 38 is discussed. Schedule of 38 works is this summer. Is noted as a relevant contributor to near-by trails initiatives and development. The K+P – 8KM+/- from Harrowsmith to Orso is noted to be out for tender in the next three (3) weeks. And bridge contract at the end of July. White Creek. Areas discussed as areas that should be looked at in more detail. K+P is noted that it is officially a recognized OFSC trail (the new opened pieces of K+P). OFSC will undertake grooming and maintenance related. Intent to continue to
Infrastructure to enable trail strategy.
‘Rails to Trails’
Quebec
Snowmobiling – OFSC
Variety
Trailheads
ATVs
Operations and Maintenance
‘A to A Trail’
Spirit of Trails
K+P ‘Gap’
KFL+A
Lake Ontario Trail
NORTH-SOUTH
K+P
Eastern Ontario Trails Alliance (EOTA)
Cole Creek
OFSC
key
2
Trails Concept Plan
Page 66 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Tri-Athlete Events
White Lake Road
Volksmarching
Land Use Permissions
N. Frontenac
K+P – ‘not a trail’
Trail Standards
Winter
Gates
Rideau Trail
Local Businesses
Bell abandoned trail
Poison Ivy
Maintenance Height
Trailhead at Verona/#38
Stone dust
Pay Per Use
Community Pride
CPTED
Schools
Sharbot Lake. And in area of Verona with ATVs is discussed. Training in Sharbot Lake area of tri-athletes is noted. KIDS TO STEEL July 27th is noted. 900-1100 people are anticipated with 130 children. This type of event should be considered and promoted as part of the Trails Plan. Tri-athletes ‘now an issue’. Road 38 will serve a function in servicing this event. What future trail opportunities off-road could serve an event like this is asked. Simon Whitfield may be involved in a promotional capacity. Area is discussed generally and v. trails opportunities. Is mentioned as a notable/valuable community activity that should be promoted. ATV and land/trial use discussions is noted. Allan details some examples of varying land-use agreements and reasoning for some current restrictions in access. E.g. K+P v. Cataraqui Trail, Rideau Trail township liabilities, and Operations and Maintenance. Going ‘all the way up’ is discussed as important feature to the trails concept plan. Is mentioned as ‘not a trail’. Discussion regarding the ‘level of disturbance’ proceeds. It is suggested that ‘less is more’ for some trail types and that this notion should be considered for the overall plan. The question is raised as to whether or not a standard 3M wide trail should be applied in all cases. Relatively untouched areas are noted as desirable in many circumstances. In light on comments regarding the K+P as not ‘a trail’, the reasoning and need for standards and accessibility is noted and discussed in general terms. Plough and grooming is discussed – relative to OFSC activity and potential for ploughing in other areas for pedestrian access all-seasons. The extents of OFSC maintenance activity v’ ploughing’ is discussed. The design and geometry of gates is noted – that should be able to accommodate wheel chairs. To downtown Kingston and related information (not) available at City Hall should be considered as an opportunity to promote trail use in the County. And to promote the visibility and use of Frontenac trails. Spin-off benefits of trails - for commercial and retail vendors - are raised as a major opportunity. Is noted as an opportunity for consideration since property hand-off. Is discussed as a vegetation management consideration. The height of vegetation pruning (e.g. by OFSC) should consider heights up to 10-ft to allow for clear and comfortable pedestrian access in summer. Noted as a major opportunity. Is noted as a highly desirable surface treatment. The notion of user-pay trails is mentioned and discussed as a prospective future mechanism to aid in trail management and maintenance. Trails are mentioned as a key component to community pride and ownership. Community engagement in their construction and maintenance is seen as a positive notion. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design is mentioned as a notable design consideration of trails and to enhance perceived and real safety for trail users. Public Health notes the importance of trail and walking facilities that promote access for children to schools. Including access to Healthy Foods, Schools, Medical Centres, and Daily Services. Trail network should consider access to these points.
End.
3
Trails Concept Plan
Page 67 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
May 26, 2014
AgendaItem#6
Page 68 of 149
Public Information Center/Open House
Trails Concept Plan
How do you envision the future benefits of trails in the County of Frontenac?
AgendaItem#6
Page 69 of 149
2
Trails Concept Plan
Team Expertise and Introductions Project Manager– Jonathan Loschmann OALA, CSLA, LEED® AP • 12 years of experience with trails • Technical and project management - trail design and construction • Recently involved in the North Grenville Integrated Community Trails Study and the K&P Trail Urban Link projects, City of Ottawa trails
Planner – John Grieve B.ES, MCIP • Experience on a wide range of projects including transportation master plans, traffic impact studies, corridor and active transportation studies • Recently involved in the Williamsville Main Street Study and Bicycle Lane Feasibility studies in Kingston
Expert Team: Principle in Charge – Dave McLaughlin MES, MCIP, RPP • 20 + years of experience in the transportation and land use planning fields • A leading specialist in active and sustainable transportation • Active in the promotion of Active Transportation and TDM strategies
AgendaItem#6
Page 70 of 149
3
Trails Concept Plan
Purpose of Today’s Meeting
To gather your input to assist in developing the County-wide Frontenac Trails Concept Plan
Provide you an overview of key background information, work to date, and to share our expertise.
AgendaItem#6
Page 71 of 149
4
Trails Concept Plan
Agenda Outline 6:30 – 7:00 pm
Welcome and chance to view story boards and maps 7:00 – 7:20 pm
Short presentation
Principles, Purpose, Benefits Opportunities, Work to Date, Methodology Route Selection Principles & Next Steps
7:20 pm –8:30 pm
- Question & Answer Period Workshop & public input
AgendaItem#6
Page 72 of 149
5
Trails Concept Plan
Guiding Principles • “Trails provide safe recreational space for residents and visitors to get active and to appreciate our unique natural environment. This concept plan will help the County shape its vision for trails in the future.” – Frontenac County Warden Bud Clayton
AgendaItem#6
Page 73 of 149
6
Trails Concept Plan
Benefits of Trails •
Multi-Use
•
Active
•
Passive
•
Motorized
•
Non-Motorized
•
Four Seasons
•
Hiking
•
Accessibility
AgendaItem#6
Page 74 of 149
7
Trails Concept Plan
Methodology and Work Plan
- Investigate initiatives that facilitate the development of existing trails
- Goal of the project is to develop a Trails Concept Plan that will: • Verify the existing trail inventory • Update trail standards • Guide development of priority trails, trail upgrades and new connections over the next 10 years
- Schedule • January 2014 Kick-off Meeting with County and Trails A. Comm. • May 2014 - Public Information Centre • August 2014 – Final Draft Plan to County of Frontenac
AgendaItem#6
Page 75 of 149
8
Trails Concept Plan
‘The Plan’ - Deliverables
- Comprehensive inventory
- Proposed connections and linkages
- Recommended upgrades
- Trails concept plan map(s) (GIS)
- Prioritization / ranking list of potential
- Implementation and phasing plan –
For next 10 years
AgendaItem#6
Page 76 of 149
9
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 77 of 149
10
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 78 of 149
11
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 79 of 149
12
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 80 of 149
13
Trails Concept Plan
Summary & Next Steps
Welcome and chance to view story boards and maps
Short presentation Principles, Purpose, Benefits of Trails Opportunities, Work to Date, Methodology Route Selection Criteria & Next Steps
Question & Answer Period Workshop & public input
AgendaItem#6
Page 81 of 149
14
Trails Concept Plan
Next Steps Receive your input and summary of Q+A Workshop
- Finalize existing trail inventory
- Update County trail standards
- Outline recommendations for the development of priority trails including standards and network using criteria identified and public input received.
- Final Draft Plan to County of Frontenac – August 2014
AgendaItem#6
Page 82 of 149
15
Trails Concept Plan
Thank You
AgendaItem#6
Page 83 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
Q&A - Workshop
- Do you use or know of trails in the County not currently shown?
- What key connection and linkage priorities do you recommend?
- Do you have any specific upgrades and/or user group change recommendations? Please share any other/general recommendations/ comments to inform the plan . Trails concept plan map using GIS software Develop a prioritization / ranking list of potential future trails Develop a trail implementation and phasing plan
17
AgendaItem#6
Page 84 of 149
• • •
Trails Concept Plan
Expertise and Resources
AgendaItem#6
Page 85 of 149
18
Trails Concept Plan
Rewards of Trails
AgendaItem#6
Page 86 of 149
19
Trails Concept Plan
Experience and References North Grenville Integrated Community Trails Study (2011) • North Grenville was committed to developing and implementing integrated and network trials • The health and fitness benefits of the trails were the cornerstone piece for North Grenville • The trails strategy proposed polices and a network which promoted health and fitness, integrated tourism potential and increased trail connectivity
Reference Mr. Forbes Symon Director of Planning and Development Municipality of North Grenville
AgendaItem#6
Page 87 of 149
20
Trails Concept Plan
Experience and References cont’d County of Essex County-Wide Active Transportation Master Plan (2011) • Developed a plan to guide the County and local municipalities in the implementation of cycling and pedestrian facilities over a 20 year horizon • The health and fitness benefits of the trails were the cornerstone piece for the County • The trails strategy proposed policies and a network which promotes health and fitness, integrated tourism potential and increased trail connectivity
Reference Jane Mustac, P.Eng Manager of Transportation Planning County of Essex
AgendaItem#6
Page 88 of 149
21
Trails Concept Plan
Experience and References cont’d County of Wellington Active Transportation Master Plan (2012) • Worked with County of Wellington and local municipalities to develop Master Plan • Developed to create and improve opportunities throughout the County for active forms of transportation • The plan built on work that had already be completed and input gathered from the AT Sub-Committee
AgendaItem#6
Page 89 of 149
22
Trails Concept Plan
Thank You
AgendaItem#6
Page 90 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Appendix B
Route Evaluation Worksheets
Trails Concept Plan
Page 91 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
K&P Trail
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Highway 38, North of Verona
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Wilbur
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
N/A
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
3
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
N/A
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
3
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
N/A
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
2
Collision History
N/A
9
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
3
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
3
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
2
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
43
Access to Services and Accommodations
3
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
10
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
17
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.5
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
3
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 92 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Verona ‐ Frontenac Provincial Park
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Highway 38 and Desert Lake Road
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Frontenac Provincial Park
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
1
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
3
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
3
Sightlines
2
Emergency Access
2
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
3
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
1
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
1
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
1
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
39
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.1
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 93 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Sharbot Lake ‐ Sharbot Lake Provincial Park
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
K&P Trail, Sharbot Lake
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Sharbot Lake Provincial Park
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
1
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
1
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
1
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
6
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
3
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
1
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
1
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
3
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
38
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.0
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 94 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Tichborne ‐ Mountain Grove
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
K&P Trail, Tichborne
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Trans Canada Trail, Mountain Grove
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
2
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
3
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
2
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
40
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.1
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 95 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Route Name:
Arden ‐ Myers Cave
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Trans Canada Trail, Arden
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Myers Cave
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
2
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
3
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
2
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
40
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.1
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 96 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
K&P Trail ‐ Ompah ‐ Plevna
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
K&P Trail
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Plevna
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
2
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
6
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
2
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
39
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.1
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 97 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Route Name:
Verona ‐ Bellrock
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
K&P Trail, Verona
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Bellrock
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
43
Access to Services and Accommodations
3
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.3
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 98 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Verona ‐ Tichborne ‐ Parham ‐ Bellrock Loop
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Parham,
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Bellorock Road, Bellrock
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
2
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
3
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
45
Access to Services and Accommodations
3
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.4
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 99 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Route Name:
Godfrey ‐ Westport
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
K&P Trail, Godfrey
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Westport Road, County of Frontenac/Leeds and Grenville Boundary
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
7
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
3 Design Feasibility and Maintenance
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Local Commitment
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
44
Access to Services and Accommodations
3
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.3
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Desirable
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 100 of 149
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Westport ‐ Kingston
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Perth Road, Frontenac County/Leeds and Grenville Boundary
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Perth Road, Frontenac County/City of Kingston Boundary
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
7
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2 Design Feasibility and Maintenance
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Local Commitment
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
42
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.2
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Desirable
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 101 of 149
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Battersea ‐ Kingston
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Battersea Road, Battersea
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Battersea Road, Frontenac County/City of Kingston Boundary
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
42
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.2
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 102 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Route Name:
Inverary ‐ Sunbury
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Parth Road, Inverary
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Battersea Road, Battersea
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
2
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
2
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
2
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
3
Collision History
N/A
7
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
2
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
2
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
3
Connects Significant Population Centres
3
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
42
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.2
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 103 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
Trails Concept Plan
Part iii: Route Evaluation Worksheet
County of Frontenac – Trails Concept Plan
Chart 1: Route Description Route Name:
Trails Priority Tool – September 2014
Frontenac Islands ‐ Winter Dock
Location (Municipality):
County of Frontenac
Route Start Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Dawson Point Road Ferry Ramp
Route End Point (nearest roadway, intersection, GPS coordinates etc.):
Joy Road and County Road 96
Evaluation Completed by (name and position / title):
John Grieve, MMM Group
Date of Evaluation:
Sep‐14
Chart 2: Route Evaluation (cont’d)
Chart 2: Route Evaluation
Score Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
Rationale for Score Entered
Score
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Criteria
Step 1: High-Level Route Selection Criteria
(0-3), or N/A
3
Motor Vehicle Traffic Volumes
1
B. Is a practical part of a spine network which links the townships of Frontenac County
0
Motor Vehicle Operating Speeds
2
C. Builds upon established cycle tourism routes or corridors with high potential for cycle tourism.
3
Truck and Commercial Vehicle Traffic
1
Sightlines
3
Emergency Access
2
Collision History
N/A
6
*If the route scores 6 or greater please proceed to Step 2. If the route scores less than 6 please select an alternative route for consideration / assessment.
Route Characteristics & Safety Considerations
Step 2: Experiential Criteria Scenic & Attractive
3
- Makes the Best Use of Existing Area Cycling Infrastructure
N/A
Demonstrates Existing and / or Future Demand
2
Appropriateness of Facility Types
N/A
Perception of Safety and Security
2
Local Commitment
N/A
Level of Comfort
2
- Benefits vs. Investment Cost
N/A
Topography
3
- Operational / Maintenance
N/A
Consistent with Local Tourism Strategies & Goals
N/A
Links Significant Destinations and Attractions
2
Connects Significant Population Centres
2
A. Subtotal (sum of all scores in Step 2 and 3)
39
Access to Services and Accommodations
2
B. Number of Rows / Criteria receiving N/A Reponses
8
- Provides Intermodal Links
1
C. Number of Rows where score of 0-3 was entered
19
- Easy to Follow
3
D. Overall score (Row A / Row C)
2.1
- Crosses Major Physical Barrier(s)
N/A
- Meets User Needs
2
Design Feasibility and Maintenance
Step 4: Final Score
Connected
Logical
AgendaItem#6•
Page 104 of 149
Desirable
Responsibility (Ministry / Division / Branch / Office/ etc.)
Step 3: Safety and Feasibility Criteria
A. Provides linkages to key geographic and cultural features
Sub-Total for High-Level Provincial Route Selection Criteria (must have a score of 6 or more to move to Step 2):
Rationale for Score Entered
AgendaItem#6•
Appendix C
Sample Unit Prices
Trails Concept Plan
Page 105 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
SAMPLE - Unit Prices County of Frontenac - Trails Concept Plan July 2014 │ MMM Group Limited
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
VALUE
COMMENTS/ASSUMPTIONS 1.0
GENERAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Shared Lanes / Paved Shoulders 1
Signed Bike Route in Urban Area
linear KM
$1,500.00
Price for both sides of the road, assumes one sign a minimum of every 330m / direction of travel (e.g. 6 signs / km).
2
Signed Bike Route in Rural Area
linear KM
$1,000.00
Price for both sides of the road, assumes one sign a minimum of every 600m / direction of travel (e.g. 4 signs / km)
3
Signed Bike Route with Sharrow Lane Markings
linear KM
$3,500.00
Price for both sides of the road, includes route signs every 330m ($1,500/km both sides), and sharrow stencil every 75m as per Ministry Guidelines (Painted $75 each x 26/km = $1,950 in table) If thermoplastic type product is used assume $250 / each x 26 = $6,500 source Flint Trading Inc.
4
Signed Bike Route with Wide Curb Lane with Construction of a New Road
linear KM
$60,000.00
Price for both sides of the road, assumes 0.5m to 1.0m widening on both sides of the road (3.5m to 4.0m)
5
Signed Bike Route with Wide Curb Lane with Road Reconstruction Project
linear KM
$240,000.00
Price for both sides of the road, includes curb replacement, catch basin adjustments, lead extensions and driveway ramps
6
Signed Bike Route with Paved Shoulder in conjunction with existing road reconstruction / resurfacing
linear KM
$55,000.00
Price for both sides of the road, 1.5m paved shoulder, assumes cycling project pays for additional granular base, asphalt and edge line (assume $110,000 per kilometre if additional widening of granular base required)
7
Signed Bike Route with Buffered Paved Shoulder in conjunction with existing road reconstruction / resurfacing project
linear KM
$150,000.00
Price for both sides of the road, 1.5m paved shoulder + 0.5 to 1.0m paved buffer, assumes cycling project pays for additional granular base, asphalt, edge lines and signs (buffer zone framed by white edge lines)
8
Addition of Rumble Strip to Existing Buffered Paved Shoulder (rural)
linear KM
$3,000.00
Price for both sides
9
Granular Shoulder Sealing
linear KM
$3,000.00
Both sides spray emulsion applied to harden the granular shoulder. This will reduce gravel on the paved portion of the shoulder and significantly reduce shoulder maintenance.
Active Transportation Paths and Multi-Use Trails Two Way Active Transportation Multi-use path within road right-of-way
linear KM
$275,000.00
3.0m wide hard surface pathway (asphalt) within road right of way (no utility relocations). Does not include trail lighting.
2
Two Way Active Transportation Multi-use path within road right-of-way on one side with removal of existing sidewalk
linear KM
$320,000.00
3.0m wide hard surface pathway (asphalt) within road right of way on one side of road in place of 1.5m concrete sidewalk (includes crushing of existing sidewalk and compacting for trail base). Does not include trail lighting.
3
Concrete Splash Strip placed within road right-of-way between Active Transportation Multi-Use Path and Roadway
m²
$150.00
4
Hard Surfaced Off-Road Multi-Use Trail Outside of Road Right-of-Way in an Urban Setting (New)
linear KM
$250,000.00
3.0m wide hard surface pathway (asphalt) within park setting (normal conditions) 90mm asphalt depth
5
Hard Surfaced Off-Road Multi-Use Trail Outside of Road Right-of-Way in an Urban Setting (Upgrade existing granular surface)
linear KM
$100,000.00
Includes some new base work (25% approx.), half of the material excavated is removed from site. Add trail marker signs
6
Granular Surfaced Off-Road Multi-Use Trail Outside of Road Right-of-Way in an Urban Setting
linear KM
$140,000.00
3.0m wide, compacted stone dust surface normal site conditions
7
Granular Surfaced Off-Road Multi-Use Trail Outside of Road Right-of-Way in an Rural Setting (New)
linear KM
$200,000.00
3.0m wide, compacted stone dust surface in complex site conditions (includes cost of clearing and grubbing)
8
Upgrade existing granular surface trail to meet 3.0m wide compacted granular trail standard
linear KM
$50,000.00
Includes some new base work (25% approx.) and an average of 20 regulatory signs per kilometre
9
Off-Road Multi-Use Trail Outside of Road Right-of-Way on Abandoned Rail Bed in a Rural Setting
linear KM
$130,000.00
3.0m wide, compacted stone dust surface, includes signage along trail and gates at road crossings
10
Granular Surfaced Multi-use Trail in a Woodland Setting
linear KM
$120,000.00
2.4m wide, compacted stone dust surface
2.1
Pedestrian Boardwalk (Light-Duty)
linear KM
$1,500,000.00
Structure on footings, 3.0m wide with railings
2.2
Self weathering steel truss bridge
m²
$2,500.00
Price varies from $2,000 - $2,500. Footings/ abutments additional, assume $30,000 per side for spread footings; $50,000 - $90,000 per side for piles
2.3
Retrofit / Widen Existing Pedestrian / Trail Bridge (29m long, 3m clear width)
m²
$2,500.00
Price assumes modifications to existing abutments Price varies from $1,000,000 - $8,000,000. Requirements and design vary widely, use price as general guideline only
Colour Stamped Concrete
AgendaItem#6•
Page 106 of 149
1
2.0 STRUCTURES AND CROSSINGS
2.4
Grade separated cycling/overpass of major arterial/highway
2.5
Metal stairs with hand railing and gutter to roll bicycle
each
$500,000.00
vertical M
$3,000.00
2.6
1.8m wide, galvanized steel
Pathway Crossing of Private Entrance
each
$2,000.00
Price varies from $1,500 - $2,000. Adjustment of existing curb cuts to accommodate 3.0m multi-use pathway
2.7
Pathway / Road transition at unsignalized intersection(crossride)
each
$5,000.00
Typically includes warning signs, curb cuts and minimal restoration (3.0m pathway)
2.8
Pathway / Road transition at existing signalized intersection (crossride)
each
$25,000.00
Typically includes installation of 4 signal heads, 2 poles, 2 foundations, 2 controller connector and 2 arms.
2.9
At grade mid-block crossing
each
$5,000.00
Typically includes pavement markings on pathway, warning signs, curb cuts and minimal restoration. Does not include median refuge island.
2.1
Median Refuge
each
$20,000.00
Average price for basic refuge with curbs, no pedestrian signals
2.11
Mid-block Pedestrian Signal
each
$100,000.00
Prices varies from $75,000 - $100,000. Varies depending on number of signal heads required
2.12
At grade railway crossing
each
$120,000.00
Flashing lights, motion sensing switch (C.N. estimate)
2.13
At grade railway crossing with gate
each
$300,000.00
Flashing lights, motion sensing switch and automatic gate (C.N. estimate)
2.14
Below grade railway crossing
each
$750,000.00
Price varies from $500,000 to $750,000. 3.0m wide, unlit culvert style approx. 10 m long for single elevated railway track
2.15
Multi use subway under 4 lane road
each
$1,200,000.00
Price varies from $1,000,0000 - $3,000,000. Guideline price only for basic 3.3 m wide, lit.
2.16
Retaining Wall
m²
$600.00
Face metre squared
Page 1 of 2
Trails Concept Plan
SAMPLE - Unit Prices County of Frontenac - Trails Concept Plan July 2014 │ MMM Group Limited
3.0 BARRIERS AND ACCESS CONTROL FOR MULTI-USE TRAILS OUTSIDE OF THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 3.1
Lockable gate (2 per road crossing)
each
$5,000.00
Heavy duty gates, price for one side of road (2 required per road crossing). Typically only required in rural settings or city boundary areas
3.2
Metal offset gates
each
$1,200.00
“P”-style park gate
3.3
Removable Bollard
each
$500-$750
Price varies from $500 - $700. Basic style (e.g. 75mm diameter galvanized), with footing. Increase budget for decorative style bollards
3.4
Berming/boulders at road crossing
each
$600.00
Price for one side of road (2 required per road crossing)
3.5
Granular parking lot at staging area (15 car capacity-gravel)
each
$35,000.00
Basic granular surfaced parking area (i.e. 300mm granular B sub-base with 150mm granular A surface), with precast bumper curbs. Includes minor landscaping and site furnashings, such as garbage receptacles and bike racks.
3.6
Page wire fencing
linear M
$20.00
1.5m height with peeled wood posts
3.7
Chain link fencing
linear M
$100.00
Galvanized, 1.5m height
4.1
Regulatory and caution Signage (off-road pathway) on new metal post
each
$250.00
Price varies from $150 - $250. 300mm x 300mm metal signboard c/w metal “u” channel post
4.2
Signboards for interpretive sign
each
$800.00
Price varies from $500 - $800. Does not include graphic design. Based on a 600mm x 900mm typical size and embedded polymer material, up to 40% less for aluminum or aluminum composite panel
4.3
Staging area kiosk
each
$5,000.00
Price varies from $2,000 - $10,000. Price depends on design and materials selected. Does not include design and supply of signboards
4.4
Signboards for staging area kiosk sign
each
$2,000.00
Price varies from $1,500 - $2,000. Typical production cost, does not include graphic design (based on a 900mm x 1500mm typical size and embedded polymer material). Up to 40% less for aluminum or aluminum composite panel
4.5
Pathway directional sign
each
$750.00
Price varies from $500 - $750. Bollard / post (100mm x100mm marker), with graphics on all 4 sides
4.6
Pathway marker sign
each
$250.00
Bollard / post (100mm x100mm marker), graphics on one side only
4.7
Pathway marker sign
linear KM
$1,500.00
Price for both sides of the path, assumes one sign on average, per direction of travel every 0.5 km
4.0 SIGNAGE
4.8
Pathway marker sign (Double sided sign on existing post or previously proposed post)
each
$200.00
Double sided sign on existing post (includes installation of signs)
4.9
Pathway marker sign (Single sign on existing post or previously proposed post)
each
$125.00
Single sign on existing post (includes installation of sign)
4.10
Pathway marker sign (Double sided sign on new post)
each
$300.00
Double sided sign on new post (includes installation of post and signs)
5.1
Major rough grading (for multi-use pathway)
m³
$25.00
Price varies from $10 - $25. Varies depending on a number of factors including site access, disposal location etc.
5.0 OTHER
Clearing and Grubbing
m²
$2.00
5.3
Bicycle rack (Post and Ring style)
each
$250.00
Price varies from $150 - $250. Holds 2 bicycles , price varies depending on manufacturer (includes installation)
5.4
Bicycle rack
each
$1,200.00
Price varies from $1,000 - $1,200. Holds 6 bicycles, price varies depending on manufacturer (includes installation)
5.5
Bicycle Locker
each
$3,000.00
Price varies depending on style and size. Does not include concrete mounting pad
5.6
Bench
each
$2,000.00
Price varies from $1,000 - $2,000. Price varies depending on style and size. Does not include footing/concrete mounting pad
5.7
Safety Railings/Rubrail
linear M
$120.00
Price varies from $100 - $120. 1.4m height basic post and rail style
5.8
Small diameter culvert
linear M
$200.00
Price varies from $150 - $250. Price range applies to 400mm to 600mm diameter PVC or CSP culverts for drainage below trail
5.9
Pathway Lighting
linear M
$130-$160
Includes cabling, connection to power supply, transformers and fixtures
5.10
Relocation of Light / Support Pole
each
$4,000.00
Adjustment of pole offset (distance between pole and roadway)
5.11
Relocation of Signal Pole / Utility Box
each
$8,000.00
Adjustment of pole offset (distance between pole and roadway)
5.12
Flexible Bollards
each
$100.00
Should be placed at 10m intervals where required
5.13
Pavement Markings
linear M
$1.00
5.14
Unit Pavers
m²
$80-$120
Includes base. Price range reflects different paver styles.
5.15
Bike Box (Green Paint)
m²
$30.00
Price includes green paint, signs and markings. Assumes green paint is 3 times more expensive than white paint. Based on $10 / m² ($1 per linear metre) for white paint. Price of thermoplastic is estimated at $55 / m² ($5.5 per linear metre) for lane line.
AgendaItem#6•
Page 107 of 149
5.2
NOTES:
- Unit Prices are for functional design purposes only, include installation but exclude contingency, design and approvals costs (unless noted) and reflect 2013 dollars, based on projects in southern Ontario
- Estimates do not include the cost of property acquisitions, signal modifications, utility relocations, major roadside drainage works or costs associated with site-specific projects such as bridges, railway crossings, retaining walls, and stairways, unless otherwise noted
- Assumes typical environmental conditions and topography
- Applicable taxes and permit fees are additional
Page 2 of 2
AgendaItem#6•
Appendix D
December 2013 Presentation to TAC
Trails Concept Plan
Page 108 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 109 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
Outline • Introductions • GIS Data Mapping • Notice of Study Commencement • Consultation Strategy • Trails Priority Tool • Project Schedule / Key Milestones • Next Steps / Other Business / General Q&A
AgendaItem#6
Page 110 of 149
2
Trails Concept Plan
Project Team MMM Group • Incorporated in 1957 as Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited and renamed MMM Group in 2007 • Offices in seven provinces as well as in the USA and UK • More than 2000 employees with approximately one third of them licenced professionals • Recognized as an industry leader in the provision of quality, cost-effective and technically excellent multidisciplinary solutions
Active Transportation Services • Industry leader in the development and delivery of trails and active transportation related planning, facility design, policy development and implementation • Work experience spans Ontario and Canada and is used by our clients and partners to guide the design and development of trail and AT networks • Our trail and active transportation experience is complemented by work and expertise in the fields of transportation planning and engineering, civil and bridge design, landscape architecture, land use planning and public/stakeholder engagement and consultation
AgendaItem#6
Page 111 of 149
3
Trails Concept Plan
Team Delivery
AgendaItem#6
Page 112 of 149
4
Trails Concept Plan
Project Team cont’d Principle in Charge – Dave McLaughlin MES, MCIP, RPP • 20 + years of experience in the transportation and land use planning fields • A leading specialist in active and sustainable transportation • Active in the promotion of Active Transportation and TDM strategies
Project Manager– Jonathan Loschmann OALA, CSLA, LEED® AP • 12 years of experience with trails and ecologically sensitive site design • Technical and project management skills in concept and detail design, trail design and construction • Recently involved in the North Grenville Integrated Community Trails Study and the K&P Trail Urban Link projects
AgendaItem#6
Page 113 of 149
5
Trails Concept Plan
Project Team cont’d Project Coordinator – John Grieve B.ES, MCIP • Experience on a wide range of projects including transportation master plans, traffic impact studies, corridor and active transportation studies • Recently involved in the Williamsville Main Street Study and Bicycle Lane Feasibility studies in Kingston
Stakeholder Consultation – Claire Basinski, B.ES, MCIP, RPP • Has led many transportation and active transportation master plan public and stakeholder consultation and engagement activities • Typically responsible for the development of consultation strategies, innovative materials and engagement tools
Network Mapping and GIS Data Management – Cristina Valente, B.A.
6
AgendaItem#6
Page 114 of 149
• Experience in the development of the network and mapping of active transportation and trails networks • Often responsible for mapping and GIS data management on trail, cycling and AT Plans
Trails Concept Plan
GIS Data and Mapping • Received November 26th • Will be used in conjunction with Aerial Imagery to review and verify current inventory (ongoing) • Develop new map(s) based on the updated inventory • Envision a total of five maps – – – – –
County Wide (36” x 72”) North Frontenac (48” x 36”) Central Frontenac (48” x 36”) South Frontenac (48” x 36”) Frontenac Islands (48” x 36”)
North Frontenac
South Frontenac
Central Frontenac
Frontenac Islands
County Wide
AgendaItem#6
Page 115 of 149
7
Trails Concept Plan
Notice of Study Commencement •
To be issued online – Frontenac County Website.
•
Consider newspaper posting.
•
Available in PDF for email from Stakeholders and Trails Committee / County Staff.
•
Recommended to be posted immediately.
AgendaItem#6
Page 116 of 149
8
Trails Concept Plan
Consultation Strategy • Hold workshop with Trails Committee (TAC) and select key stakeholders. • Provide opportunity to come together and discuss and comment on Draft elements. – Draft Trails Concept Plan – Draft Prioritization / Ranking List of Projects – Updated Trail Standards
• Held as separate workshops or combined workshops. • Scheduled in conjunction with February 2014 TAC meeting. • Opportunity to attendees to suggestion potential additional trail opportunities, needs, linkages. AgendaItem#6
Page 117 of 149
9
Trails Concept Plan
Trails Priority Tool • Suitability Index • Effective Tool • Guide County-wide and Township specific initiatives • Establish priorities as a main product of this project • Assign budgets to priorities
Frontenac Scoring Sheet
AgendaItem#6
Page 118 of 149
10
Trails Concept Plan
Project Schedule / Key Milestones
December 2nd, 2013
February 6th, 2014
April 3rd, 2014
AgendaItem#6
Page 119 of 149
11
Trails Concept Plan
Thank You
AgendaItem#6
Page 120 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Appendix E
August 2014 Presentation to TAC
Trails Concept Plan
Page 121 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
AgendaItem#6
Page 122 of 149
Trails Concept Plan
Outline 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Summary of Work (1 minute) Consultation (2 minute) Recommendations & Report (10 minutes) Next Steps (2 minutes) Discussion (15-20 minutes)
AgendaItem#6
Page 123 of 149
2
Trails Concept Plan
1.0 Summary of Work • Extensive table-top research into Existing Context
• County consultation with Departments of Public Works • Development of Draft Report and technical content • Elaborated GIS Mapping of existing and proposed network including Opportunities mapping AgendaItem#6
Page 124 of 149
3
Trails Concept Plan
1.0 Summary of Work • Public input - Recommendations in address of comment and in address of technical needs • Mapping of proposed trail routes (on-road and off-road) • Preliminary financial estimate of proposed routes (Facility Types)
AgendaItem#6
Page 125 of 149
4
Trails Concept Plan
2.0 Consultation • Information Centre/Workshop - May 2014. • Provided a critical opportunity to assemble and discuss comment on Draft elements. – Draft Trails Opportunity Plan – Draft Prioritization / Ranking List of Projects – Trail Standards
• Opportunity for attendees to suggest potential additional trail opportunities, needs, linkages.
AgendaItem#6
Page 126 of 149
5
Trails Concept Plan
2.0 Consultation • • • • • • • •
Healthy Living and promotion of active life styles ‘Definition’ of Trails County ‘responsibility’ - ‘Spirit of trails’ Economic Drivers & Tourism Potential Context of Existing Trails and Surroundings K+P a unique opportunity to seize Trailheads Snowmobiling
AgendaItem#6
Page 127 of 149
6
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Two (2) principle physical recommendations – Develop Off-Road Trail/Routes – Develop On-Road Routes
•
Connect
- To the Spine Network (complete and provide)
- Towns and Villages to Significant Natural Areas
- Significant Public Natural Areas to Significant Nat. Areas
AgendaItem#6
Page 128 of 149
7
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations Complete and Provide Connections to “spine” Network Trails • The K&P Trails forms a “spine” which runs generally north-south. The Cataraqui Trail and the Trans Canada Trail form east-west “spines” through the County. New trails should provide a connection to these spines. Priority should be given to completing the Trail initiatives with connections to “spine” trails.
AgendaItem#6
Page 129 of 149
8
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations Connecting Towns and Villages • Improving trail connections within and between Towns and Villages • Increase access to population centers • Improve the overall connectivity of the active transportation network.
AgendaItem#6
Page 130 of 149
9
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations Connecting to Towns and Villages to Public Natural Areas • Improving trail connections to and from the towns and villages to the provincial parks, management areas and community parks. • Increase resident’s access to trails and recreation opportunities. • Connecting natural areas to each other • Provide opportunities to boost tourism AgendaItem#6
Page 131 of 149
10
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Facility Type - Off-Road Trail – Primary 3.0M, Secondary 2.0-2.4M, ‘Foot’ trail 0.75-1.5M width
AgendaItem#6
Page 132 of 149
11
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Facility Type - On-Road Trail/Route ‘A’ – Signed Route – Wide Shared Roadway – 4.04.5m; narrow 3.0m-4.0m – MTO Book 18 – Bicycle Facility Type Selection – Typically low-volume road
AgendaItem#6
Page 133 of 149
12
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Facility Type - On-Road Trail/Route ‘B’ – Paved Shoulder – Typically 1.5-2.0m width
– Potential buffer zone depending on vehicle speeds and volumes
AgendaItem#6
Page 134 of 149
13
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations Identified routes include: •
K&P Trail: Complete the K&P Trail to Wilbur in Frontenac County. In collaboration with Lanark County and Renfrew County the trail could ultimately be connected all the way to Calabogie in the future.
•
Verona - Frontenac Provincial Park: Connect Verona to Frontenac Provincial Park with a signed route along Desert Lake Road and Bedford Road.
•
Sharbot Lake - Sharbot Lake Provincial Park: Connect Sharbot Lake to Sharbot Lake Provincial Park via the K&P Trail with a paved shoulder facility (Highway 7).
AgendaItem#6
Page 135 of 149
14
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations •
Tichborne - Mountain Grove: Connecting Tichborne to Mountain Grove would service as the first part in the development of a new route connecting the K&P Trail and the central spine of Frontenac County to Bon Echo Provincial Park. A paved shoulder facility is proposed on Highway 38 from Tichborne to Parham. From Parham, a signed route should be implemented along Long Lake Road to Mountain Grove.
•
Arden - Myers Cave: The second part of a new route connecting the K&P Trail would be to connect Arden to Myers Cave with signed routes along Henderson Road, Harlow Road and Myers Cave Road.
AgendaItem#6
Page 136 of 149
15
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations •
K&P Trail - Ompah - Plevna: A signed route should be implemented along South Lavant Road and County Road 509 from the K&P Trail to Ompah and then to Plevna. Part of this route is already in place around Ompah.
•
Verona - Bellrock: The new paved shoulder facility connects Verona to Bellrock via Bellrock Road. Sign the route. Paved shoulder to the County border westward into the County of Lennox and Addington should be considered.
AgendaItem#6
Page 137 of 149
16
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations •
Inverary - Sunbury: A signed route should be installed at Moreland Dixon Road to connect the communities of Inverary and Sunbury as well as to provide a connection between the paved shoulder facilities on Perth Road and Battersea Road.
•
Frontenac Islands - Winter Dock: A signed route should be installed to provide a connection from the Frontenac Islands winter dock along to the existing signed route.
AgendaItem#6
Page 138 of 149
17
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations •
Verona - Tichborne - Parham - Bellrock Loop: A loop can be created using the K&P Trail from Verona to Tichborne, the new route from Tichborne to Parham along Highway 38 and the new route along Bellrock Road from the K&P Trail in Verona. The loop is completed with the development of a signed route from Parham to Bellrock along Raymo Road, Echo Lake Road, Oak Flats Roads, 2 Lake Road, Snider Road and 1 Lake Road. This new route should also provide an on-road connection to the Second Depot Lake conservation area.
•
Godfrey - Westport: A new paved shoulder facility would connect the K&P Trail in Godfrey to Westport via Westport Road. The County of Frontenac should work with Leeds and Grenville County to ensure the portion of this connection in Leeds and Grenville County is completed.
AgendaItem#6
Page 139 of 149
18
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations •
Westport - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with Leeds and Grenville County and the City of Kingston to complete a paved shoulder facility along Perth Road between Westport and Kingston through Perth Road and Inverary in the County of Frontenac. Due to space limitations through the community of Inverary a signed route is proposed through the village.
•
Battersea - Kingston: The County of Frontenac should work with the City of Kingston to extend the existing paved should facility on Battersea road north into the County travelling though Sunbury and Battersea. Due to space limitations through the community of Battersea a signed route is proposed through the village.
AgendaItem#6
Page 140 of 149
19
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Projected Costs of Off-Road K&P Trail (67.5 km to complete to County border) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
2014/15: To White Lake Road (9.7km) 2015/16: To Tichborne (9.9km) 2016/17: To Crow Lake Road (7.0km) 2017/18: To Sharbot Lake (5.5km) 2018+: To County Border (Wilbur) (35km)
$439K $745K $280K $233K $1.4M
20
AgendaItem#6
Page 141 of 149
– $1.3M to Sharbot Lake Trailhead of K&P and TransCanada Trail (32.5km) – $3.1M total off-road K&P trail recommendations. – Ultimate potential to connect north/south to Calabogie in collaboration with Lanark and Renfrew Counties – *Raw Order Planning-Level Estimates.
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Projected Costs of On-Road Trail/Routes Verona – Frontenac Provincial Park
Signed Route
15.9kms
$15,900
Sharbot Lake – Sharbot Lake Provincial Park
Paved Shoulder
3.5 kms
$192,500
Tichborne – Mountain Grove
Signed Route and paved shoulder
17.4 kms and 3.5
$209,900
Arden – Myers Cave
Signed Route
31.6 kms
$31,600
K&P – Ompah-Plevna
Signed Route
21.9 kms
$21,900
AgendaItem#6
Page 142 of 149
21
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Projected Costs of On-Road Trail/Routes Verona – Bellrock
Signed Route
10.7 kms
$10,700
Verona – Tichborne – Parham – Bellrock Loop
Signed Route
28.2 kms
$28,200
Godfrey – Westport
Paved Shoulder
25.2 kms
$1,386,000
Westport – Kingston
Signed route and paved shoulder
0.6 kms and 32.3 kms
$1,777,100
Battersea - Kingston
Signed route and paved shoulder
2.0 and 23.1 kms
$1,272,500
AgendaItem#6
Page 143 of 149
22
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Projected Costs of On-Road Trail/Routes Inverary - Sunbury
Signed Route
4.2 kms
$4,200
Frontenac Islands – Winter Dock
Signed Route
2.1 kms
$2,100
Total On-Road Paved-Shoulder Recommendations: $5.4M Total Signed Route recommendations: $125K
• 40% Off-Road1 • 60% On-Road1
- +/- of financial estimate of total recommendations.
AgendaItem#6
Page 144 of 149
23
Trails Concept Plan
3.0 Recommendations • Additional Report Contents – Benefits of Trails – Recreation, Economy & Tourism, Active Living, Environment, Asset Management. – Trail Design Standards – Universal Design, Wheelchairs, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) – Trail Maintenance and Operation Considerations – including Maintenance Planning – Trailheads and Staging Areas – Hierarchy and design considerations
AgendaItem#6
Page 145 of 149
24
Trails Concept Plan
4.0 Next Steps • Finalization of Mapping & Report – August 2014
• Sharing of GIS information – August 2014
• A Living Document – Through Implementation
AgendaItem#6
Page 146 of 149
25
Trails Concept Plan
Thank You 5.0 Discussion.
AgendaItem#6
Page 147 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Trails Concept Plan
Page 148 of 149
AgendaItem#6•
Draft Protocol (from sample for CRCA)
Guidelines for the Shared Use of the Frontenac K&P Trail for Snowmobiling
The L&A Ridge Runners Snowmobile Club will do the Following on an annual basis:
- Open and lock back in place all gates on the Frontenac K&P Trail from Harrowsmith to Craig Road no later than December 1st each year,
- Close and lock all gates from Harrowsmith to Craig Road no sooner than March 31st each year
- Remove any trail barriers no later than December 31st each year
- Reinstall trail barriers no sooner than March 31st each year
- Jointly establish and publicly announce / advertise the official opening and closing of the K&P each year for snowmobiling purposes
- Return the K&P to the same or better condition than it was prior to the snowmobile season. It is understood that this does not include culverts, bridges and other such infrastructure, but does include repair when necessary the decking of bridges worn due to snowmobile use
- Remove all litter created by snowmobilers
- Post all appropriate regulatory signs necessary to maintain a safe trail in the winter months. Such signs should, if possible, be a standard OFSC approved design along the entire length of the K&P. Regulatory signs of a semi-permanent nature such as speed limits, driveway ahead, drive, stop ahead, stop, OFSC/MTO trail identification, caution, trail narrows, and directional signs; may be placed on posts or on such tress that would not be damaged by the placement. These signs would then be left in place throughout the year. Such Signs should be replaced on a regular basis as damage and aging dictates.
- Post signs of an informative or commercial nature on the K&P between the opening and the closing of the snowmobile season and remove them in a timely manner after the trail closing. Such signs are to be a standard design, not of an offensive nature and placed safely to the side of the trail. It is established that the Frontenac K&P Trail is to be a shared multi-use trail during the winter season and therefore managed on a joint basis by the L&A Ridge Runners Snowmobile Club and the county of Frontenac during that time.
Gate protocol for snowmobile club on the K&P Trail
Page 149 of 149