Body: Council Type: By-law Meeting: Regular Date: 2017 Collection: By-laws Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/By-laws/2017 By-laws/By-law 2017-43 - Site Plan Agreement with McCahill Shea.pdf)
Document Text
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2017-43 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND PAUL MCCAHILL AND WAYNESHEA. WHEREAS a Site Plan Agreement has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the proponents;
NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCI, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Site Plan Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and Paul McCahill and Wayne Shea, a copy of which is attached hereto forming part of this by-law.
THAT this By-law and Agreement shall be registered on title of the properties described as Parts 3 and 4, Plan 13R-20626; Part of Lots 23 and 24, Concession VI, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac.
THIS BY-LAW shall come into force and effect in accordance with section
41 of the Planning Act 1990, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 41.
Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this eleventh day of July,
Read a first and second time this eleventh day of July, 2017.
Read a third time and finally passed this eleventh day of July, 2017
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
r, Clerk-Administrator
THIS SITEPLANAGREEMENTMADETfflS 12thDAY OF JULY, 2017. BETWEEN: PAULMCCAfflLL& WAYNESHEA hereinafter called the “Owner”
OFTHE NRSTPART
- and -
THE CORPORATIONOF THETOWNSHIPOF SOUTHFRONTENAC hereinafter called the “Municipality” OF THE SECONDPART
WHEREAS the Owner is the registered owner in fee simple of certain lands described in Schedule “A”, attached hereto, located in the Township of South Frontenac (the “Owner’s Land”); AND WHEREAS the Municipality is authorized to enter into this agreement and
register it againstthe title to the Landspursuantto section 41 ofthe PlanningAct and section 6.17 ofthe Township ofSouthFrontenacOfficialPlan; ANDWHEREASthe Municipality has passedby-lawNo. 2003-25to designateall of the Township of SouthFrontenacas a “SitePlan Control Area”; NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree each with the other as follows:
Inthis Agreement: a)
“Owner"includesa mortgagee inpossession, a tenantinpossessionpursuant to a leaseholdinterest, andencumbancerinpossessionandmay meanmore than one Ownerspecifiedin the Certificate ofownership.
The Ownercovenantsthatthe Owneris the Ownerin fee simple ofthe Owner’s land.
The obligations imposed by this Agreement affect the land described in Schedule
“A"hereto andanyrestrictive covenantsexpressedhereinrunwiththe land and bind successors in title to the said property as well as the successors and assigns of the Owner.
The encumbrancer agrees to satisfy all the obligations imposed pursuant to this document if it should enter into possession of the said land.
The following schedules are attached to and form part of this agreement and no new building, structure or other facility shall be erected, altered or placed on the
saidland exceptin accordancewiththe attachedscheduleswhichconsist of:
5.
A.
LegalDescriptionofLands
B.
Site Plan
C.
CopyofEnvironmentalReport datedJune, 2011
The Owner shall perform all the work andprovide all the materials necessary for the construction of a new home including well and septic tile field as specified on
the SitePlan, Schedule"B” to this Agreement.
Owner shall construct a 2, 000 ft.2 (approximate ground floor area) residential building with 2,669 ft. (approxunate) ofgross floor areato be located a minimum of 35 metres (115 ft.) from the highwater mark ofLoughborough Lake as shown on Schedule “B”.
The existing stands oftrees and vegetation! … along the south portion ofthe Owner’s Landwithin 30 metres ofthe highwater mark of Loughborough Lake shall be maintained as environmental and habitat protection and to provide a visual buffer to the residential uses to the south ofthe lake.
All recommendation of the environmental report dated December 2011, from the firm ‘Ecological Services’ and attached hereto as Schedule “C”, shall be implemented.
The Owner shall prevent damage being caused to existing public highways, other public works or municipal property in the course of development ofthe lands.
Inthe event of a saleofthe improvedlands,the new Ownerwill assumefull and complete responsibility for the continuing obligations under this Agreement. The enforcement ofthis Agreement is the responsibility ofthe Municipality.
TheAgreementshallberegisteredagainstthe title ofthe Landsandthe
Municipalityshall be entitledto enforceits provisions againstthe Ownerandany and all subsequent owners of the Lands.
In the event that the Owner fails to install or maintain the facilities covered by this Agreement, then, upon the ChiefBuilding OfBcial or designate, giving seven days written notice by pre-paid registered mail to the Owners, the municipality, throughit’s employees, agentsor contractors, may, withoutfurthernotice, enter upon the lands and proceed to supply all materials andto do all the necessary inspectionsandworks in connectionwiththe facilitiesincludingthe repair or reconstructionof faulty workandthe replacementofmaterials whicharenot in accordance with plans or specifications and to charge the cost thereof, together with the cost ofengineering and any other expenses incurred by the municipality, against the Owner. Such entry and work shall not be deemed as acceptance or assumption of said facilities nor an assumption by the Municipality of any liability. It is expressly agreedthatthe Ownersor anyperson in possessionshall not question the cost incuired by (he Municipality for labour, materials or any other costs incidental to do the said work and this provision shall be deemed to operate as aneffectiveestoppel injudicialproceedingsif suchcosts are
challengedorplacedin question. The Ownersagreeto permitthe ChiefBuilding Official, or agent, to enter onto the Lands at any time to inspect the work. The Municipalitymayperform anyofthe required services andcollect the cost for the enforcement ofthis Agreement against the said Lands from any security received.
The Ownercovenants andagreesthatthe lands andpremises moreparticularly described in Schedule “A” annexed hereto may only be used for those purposes
specified in Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 and the use and setbacks establishedin ZoningBy-lawAmendmentNo. 2013-04.
WITNESS the corporate seals of the respective corporate parties hereto affixed under the hands of their respective signing officers, duly authorized, in that behalf.
SIGNED, SEALEDAND DEUVERED In the presence of
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIPOF SOUTH FRONTENAC
SCHEDULE"A” LEGALDESCRIPTIONOFLANDS Parts 3 and4, Plan 13R-20626;Part ofLots 23 and 24, ConcessionVI, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac
SCHEDULE ui»» “B SITE PLAN
?..
s
~\ ..
i6y:
.
s;y’'
/
« r^w SCHEDULE"C
ENVIRONMENTALREPORT
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment Johnaton Point
Prepared by: EcologicalServices 3803 SydenhamRd. Elginburg, Ontario KOH 1MO
Phone:(613)376-6916;Fax:(613)544-0072 E-mail: ecoserv@kos. net
Prepared For:
June 2011
Environmental Assessment JohnatonPoint
Table ofContents Summary
Methodology
…5
Ecological Land Chasificatton Regulations
Provincial PlanningPolicy Significant Features
a) SignificantWetlands c) Woodlands…
e) Significant WUdlife Habitat… f) Fish Habitat “”………….,………… Literature Cited
9
10
‘..^’. ‘. ;”.’. ;".". yi6 .. 16
EnvironmentalImpactAssessment JohostonPoint SUMMARY
£:hl?e^^ss^st ^%^^^^^
threedwelling;and’aSS^SS’^£lgLake)a»dthebuildingoT
^^^^^KSS^^^^^ ^ LakeWedandC-om^ex:’nTp"^t^Te^Sl%sl ifi t.^u^b0""^’ w°^eatbrcattlepasturin&buthasbee»°
Sc£Ssad £Sl udesigniflcantwet’^-°<“a-<>.
£SepZsofthepps-Aerewiube»one^““P^toanys. gni^tn.^ ListofReconunendatlona/MUigatton
^3eL£%21ScS;?Sr^ , ^ffl^^^^
landis^p^awB7fe^eT^S3m51mn^Kle.!fltcimbe.sllowthat ^ l°“ger flow <listilnces forsto"nw>teu ‘Si
septicfierd s7iUb^rfi^3i^e"lting
m
^S^aB^S:2SS^^^^^
standanisforerosronproSc^‘n.’’”’““1’‘oe°e!“gnedtoen8ineeri»gandapproved
sS^^KSS^^^ ^.ssx^as.-ss^^ss
^^^^S^^S^^ ^sHouldbe Sketch
of ports of Lots S3 anil i4
Concessions 6 and 7
cewS’l’:Jownsy’ ?. f Lwghbamgh
nm Tomship of South Frmtmac’ County of Frantmac Scdte 1 .. sooo mrt,,
‘““a. y. “.. !». ;.””. -S 0 1 I-
FigureI. Proposedseverances andthreebuildinglots.
METHODOLOGY:
JohnstonPointwasvisited twice in2010to develop anEcologicalLandClassification map_and twice inthe springof2011,primarily to dospringbitdingsurveys. Thebulkof the field work was conducted by Rob Snetsinger, with assistance {rom Chris Grooms. An aerial flight was also taken in 2010. ECOLOGICALLAND CLASSBICATTON ,»
Pastcattlegrazingonthepropertyhasstronglyinfluenceditscunentecology. TieEcologicalLandClassification (ELC)ManualferSouthernOntario(seeLeeetcd. 1998)providesthebasisfortheELCdesignationsthatarepresentedinFigure3. Ascan
happenwithELCmapping,habitatpatchesbelowthe0.5 tia.sizethresholdarelumped into a largersurrounding type. TheELCmapalsocontains othercodesthatarenot specific ELC designations.
Cultural Meadow(CUM): Thiscommunity type ischaracterized intheELCmanual as
havinga treeandshrubcoveroflessthan25%,andresultsftomand/orismainlainedby cultural disturbances (ie.,usuallyftnning). Thissitecontainscommonagricultural
passesmixedwithvariousfieldforbssuchasGoldenrod,WildCairot,Asters,and
Clovers. CUMcommunities areconsideredtohaverelatively lowecoiogicalvalue,and thuslowpotential forsignificance,becauseoftheiryoungageandhighproportioni of non-native species.
Cultural Thicket (CUT). Thiscommunity type ischaracterized intheELCmanual as
having a shrub coye r of greater thgn 25%, and here it is dominated by Juniper, Red
Cedar,PricklyAsh,andGrayDogwood,whicharecommonlyfoundonlands;with
^.lowsoilsthathavebeenerazedindiepast YoungerWhiteOak,WhiteAsh. and WhitePinearealsogrowingamongsttheshrubs. Thereisalsoevidencethatcultural
thicketoncecoveredmuchofJohnstoaPointintheformofremnantjuniperbranches. Juniperwouldbeexpectedinanareawithshallowsoilsanda pasthistoryofgrazinguse.
However shrub areashavesincegivenwaytoyoungerforestsuccession.
Dry-Fresh SugarMaple- Ironwood Deciduous Forest Type (FOD5-4). Asthename implies, this foresttype isdominated bySugarMaple, withIronwood beingthesecond
mostdominanttree. AsdescribedtoLeeetat(1998),thisisa commonferesttypefound onareaswitha historyofgrazinguse. Thebulkofthetreesareinthe30yearagerange, althoughsporadicpatchesoflargeroldertreesatepresent Themostcommonunderetoiy
plantpresentisCarexpennsyhanica,whichisalsocommoninforestswitha grazmg history.
Maple)7lnits’asro cS’w Z’^eign«Ti ;te. pme)mld^^^^^
S”;ss:£’"£^ss’^S=s^S2
Figure3. ELCduignaUoniofJohnrtonPoint
^^^c^^ltS2S^^^
se :j^^
RedMapleMineralDeciduousSwampTynerSWD3-1Y R^ M.-I. :. .u-^_,
REGULATIONS Fisheries Act
UnderSection35ofthefederalFisheriesAct:
^^n^LC
^O"avworkwwuk!. rtakmSthatr^ i” the harmful
disruptionor destruction offishhabitat””
Therearenoplansto workwithin fishhabitat. Species at RiskAct
UnderSection32ofthefederalSpeciesatRiskAct.
~JM^Sl"sha’, ‘k’";harm’lwass- Mptwe
w take an
“^”"</"°’ ofa mldlifi
s^^wtw¥^^^v^‘lffe Under Section 33 ofthefederal SpeciesatRiskAct:
“..w.^rso, “sha”.pe’nsmstla"dama8ew destroy^ residenceofoneormore
^^^^^’-^^^^^^^e I^B?tem. “t-hees. werefolul(l.on.tlleProPerty- AnOMNRButtemutHealth ^^w^^a^’^^’^»’^^0^^, removeth^eButtemuts(iftheyneedtoberemove’iO’wlTte’proce^d'1 Migratory Birds Convention Act
Regulation,6.Subjecttosubsection5(9),nopersonshall ,
(a)disturb,destroyortake» nest,egg.nesfshelter …ofa migratorybird. £e»^pmalltpropertywntainsmiglat<“ybsds and;twouidbea contraventionof
theactifthesenestsweredestroyeddunng7onstructionac^itiK”’
I°fiwtiM"an beavoi(led17worici"8outsideofthebreedingandnestinenerin
s^t^A?T^u^uisFs sibre ^^^
S,; S^teiscleare(lpriortothen^^°’»to"mlakeTSbDS^Season
PROVINCIALPLANNINGPOUCY
SS?P%EIAWiubetoaddressi8suesas!iocia^^thePn>vincialPolicy
=S£.8S^S£SS^.2.^.^_ the Policy:
- 1.3 Developmentandrifea/tenrffonshallnotbepennittedin: b)significant-wetlands m Ecoregions5E,6Eand7E:
^sssosxsyc wtv’etimd’bvttilete^ .
I*
- 1.4 Developmentandritea/teratonshallnotbepennittedin: b)significantwoodlandssouthandeastoftheCanadianShield: tor as
d)significantwildlife habitat-,
sssss^as’”’”’-1”””"’" ^^sssss^s^"""’"^"’"-’t5St
no
development within flsh habitat’ but . here ^ be
development adjacent
onthe’r^^^r^e^SS£^here walbewmSativeimPac^’
Adjacent lands are defined in thePPS:
‘^^^ss^ss^s^ SIGNIFICANTFEATURES a) Significant Wetlands
by’^r^r^^^^^^^^^^^doama^d bysImIb forms- TIUS been
may 19857but<5m $OIn7h^. u^sA«TM)wd, ose ^^£ts^^^^^^^e^y^e the case in
have
each ofthes<’ have sevenl S. ttueSownerall!p’mdsize’and sub^ateeories. SOCM
tmJeh^TmedAattte
comPonentMO"^<^c^^^^^
^^s^esi^ESSS"
s£^£SS2?s'5s;s^s E^S c^mpolB nt!.T^rma"!yco.
vere
flood co»trol “’d water
quality
S^^?£’^M%KS^5. W” ZdT«,^.WAAe^k?F^mbco^^’^s^^^^ s.pedd,FeaturescomP°nent: Thiscomponentcoversraritiesandfishhahit,
potential spawning areas’in Long
Ba’ywill be"approrimateB fyTfoT
Toaa wl" be to
tpalsta^me. ntLTlle.proposedthreehousesa»ds»PP°rtingroadwUlnotcause a
SSS-Sl"^ l,lcT
“am)w wetlimd exteasio»
Ob°“t 5 to 10 m
officially partofthewetland andisverynarrow.’ WOODLAND mthe pps for foreste in the Canadian «w^!,iuislp"ficanc!-is"otlifactor Shield, such offorestrover eBnerriis ais°~notan7ssu^TSnuS ^!““ton. polnt. LOSS, !w^te ls. !^ted in.w^on^re^6&"~nise^fon^^^^ ^ ^TLM do^001?’»°?fll=<"^ ^SK?83% ^GSyM W&moK^WA^S^^mT^e:’^^ m
10
S^^^ss^^^^^^^^
s=SSS^E?’,^^^ ?’. 5sSss’s”-°sas=^=:“lh ss^sss ?r^sas ss=dul?dM-p ^s^^r^s. ^SS^a^^^’? ^^^^^^^T^^^^^^^^ willbeavoiding^esteepest ^l°^ore. 5Sad. en"outeto^tonPoint
^^a^-sir^ssL””–. –””"^. ^^. ^^^^sssssaiss^^^
measurablenegativeimpactto’tos"fimZ^m^uIe,,rotevel°?nent- .Ane""»pteof a
^StV^^‘SXSS^y^ ^£ree\bSffiSS^S^O%^feS^^
5Ss^J£S=^^ii=£’°’
EiSsS^‘ssa’sssaiE’bSIGNIFICANT WILDLIFEHABITAT
SS’S^‘SSSSSa,-£2S&Sdi?’ 11
^ss-^s^^s^^^^^
a^^ssa-iTO^^ i)Waterfowlstopoverandstaginganas:
ormoreoflistedspeciesandT-1Ui^^^Ti?suggests aeg"‘gationsof100
A w^w^^^^^7^s^^^scawe:
;3rsS^St °;s»", £^^^5^, "
‘"^^’^““a’saa1 ^."^, ^75^^^n^^T^S^^^^^^
iii)S^S-nS%;;^^^^^^^S
?orebml^-sites
^w^^^r&s^^^ iv)^^KS’S^S^!^^^ ^ngbiris7eed"torestsZ^^L^lufceF ontorioLwherem!Brati»e’’ suggests-useTf^dToTb^roS^^te^te:OMWP°“9)_
subject property is piater AanTkn;Zn °TITro^. b.lrilspecies as si8nificant. “The
significantSongbSp’ovewute. KmIromLakeontari0’andwefouild»0cvid^ of v)
?^ri?^SSu K^^f:S>;^–"^ vis^ ^nte,rftdoseT nS:^^^^ASS^e ws not
in
vi)^S^eB^;5S£^;°^rb ^^^^^^^
v”)R!pu.!eubernacuIaLR9rtilehibeT<=“lain
ovenvinteringsites.WefoundnoobvTo^snake^UleZ:^^^^ 12
stobeundCTtofaT”’
viiis^a^^^e?, ^^^l^ Aedevelopmentprop^>to^t^, ^^,,ne.wood!ands°°«dadjacentto
^st erdeeryaKls7Attrii)^ ^eme°tcorridors:fore^‘fi^S^cTS^:” .wer>tongran8e~
forforaging. We’couUfhd^^Xmdadsacwt ^ve agri°cultura’llands
asss^££»-sss. ^a;^^^
saa-ams^^ UOm^anT ^Sallw:S^S”:e oftflis’^°f»BS^in
w’iS^».KSSSS.s^SS. .
“)^-dB. ptorN^H. b.t.t:Wefoundnoevidenceofwoodland^or
^.^ssv^^ysss ^ 13
v)Seep,and.pri^NOseepsorspringswe.observedwithinthepn>perty.
as.sssss.ss-a-. -c-,«c«-.<» n, ornavesomeli
SpeciesofConservationConcemarep^T’S
“>£-S%^iSESBs;^,2->« “..»faS2saF,^;?S£3»s’S2F
.
“‘SS^sss^’s’sass^-. bam^^^SVS^l?^^ ^^^ b^^^ws^^^ts. ms^^ no a”^pooriyshap^Z73^^^g^fJfo^nefor^Btoo^ dmehabte:We~founT
minimal
evid^o7u^^S^^bSe
ih^^?^^S^^XK ^MOdsM^ o7^pe;^r^o^^£^^^^av01 iv)ysK^^ss’^^^^^^^^^ v)
^=^rs£asi^sS^?er
S^^S^KS^^^nK wctad-. deveI°P"ent ity;‘or"w’tUn” mofAe~subj^tIprop^cn 120
were tbundin the
^. ^ and
piopB
^S£$SSSLCS£SS>~«^”. areathefoilowfag^^^^e oneknLsquarethat»o°tMnsflie7evelopment -«”
^w:^^^^^J^£-n^ Em l%rnues^ P^r1^iSedf^n^i7^nstmI?i»tl: ^xiSKS^^^sr &^. 5"”*^^Stff£‘Si ££’^^^»^ ‘^^^^^sy^iSs’^ 14
P^^^B^^^l^m^ns^^f^n^s
OJ.ha^F^f^^Cr^^hSsh^M"pateh?f^ut"
howCTWn°. B^dB^hF^were^dA^P^en^^approp"^ ! number 1 and2 passthrough thisareaT’ """ “”"’" ulcre’ “l°P°sed roadroutes number
CommonTen(Sewhawido). SARA(NotatRiAV Th- u:-.- …-” ,.
m1^^^K^;<,rbBsebwswerelistcdi"the
‘“P"v^i;^S^K^!gn;tont. ?toay°fthe^ci"esteed such, and^tac1uteA:c7Z^^^^;^01^^ 3:Reg!udleM’lheyareanopen~
They are alsotoi^t’ofp7opkT lm^ofJOIlnston poi"tUI as I’rop”!> ‘as^elpmteJIW
RideauwatenroyT
""
uley are commo"‘y found
wiAulhebusy"’
S^K^-AS^SSa’ KTlwudueHaMtat - Aatm1 .»»ve»enteorridon
set out to
Criteria of areas,
15
sasK:eTSo ;dead-eBdsfarthernegatesitspote°^f) Fish Habitat
nn:f^Jla,bte.adJacelrttoAeProPo^^lopment wouldbeclassified as^en’S^S^T waterl.BCUS«rme"’" would
^""^dfor^fag^teS^^^^S^^ Iakes Species taown to’fluTi ^Jare’^o^ISe^a°d. is. m the area.
colnm?n to most
suchasBass;NoA»npike,lP^h.Tla^^‘n^m;°nllfoundto most. IalcramAcarea crappie> pumPldnseed> ‘»«*
nesting occurs
a^nduJoh^‘toSt ‘.
lack
BIuegiU.~SporadS
^^^^^’^^^b^^^^ ^^7o^a^mS^^^^^a^^^^ ^°^n. awayo fiT
m fi-omthewaterreganUess. " “’” ° BI°ueral!ilancetothelake- sePticfieldswillbe70
£peK^teS^ST ofthe te’“e^c-thePPS.the. .HIbeno
sx^s^^s^^^^^^^^ shouTd’aiso’’teISSZmhSI rt.on. ^wetland,
llreas^u"n 40 m offlle’^
They
^^^n^^S^^to^^^n^ UTERATURE CITED
Hw^^^bf^s^-J^ona^^^^^^^
ofCanada;--’"°/’ ““ums£:w
H’ftsapplicaton:On^Min WS D^S^S£K^^^^^^y. ^oTSU ^^tetlm Laroro^tio»Md ‘^^^^s^s^s^s^^^
^SSi’SS. SSS^^^’^ OntarioMinisbyofNaturalResources. 2009. SienificantwiMii&i….,.-.-” .
16
Ontario Minishy ofNatural Resources. 2010. Natural Heritage Reference Manual for Natural Heritage Policies ofthe Provincial Policy Statement, 2005. Second Edition. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. 248 pp.
17
