Committee Of Adjustment - 11 May 2017 - Agenda

Published May 11, 2017

Word Count 43571 words

Reading Time 205 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: May 11, 2017 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2017/Committee Of Adjustment - 11 May 2017 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Thursday, May 11, 2017 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

Resolution

Adoption of Agenda

Declaration of pecuniary interest

Approval of Minutes – [April 13, 2017]

Resolution

Minor Variance Applications from Previous Meetings

MV-28-16-B - Robert Bechard & Jamie Maclean - Concession 3, Part Lot 2, Sleapview Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

4 - 20

MV-08-17-B - Kevin & Harriet Cove - Concession 6, Part Lot 32, Island Drive Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

21 - 40

MV-14-17-B - Sally Muzik - Concession 2, Part Lot 21, Morton Point Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

41 - 49

New Consent Applications:

S-08-17-L - Estate of John Francis Koen - Concession 6, Part Lot 25, Koen Road, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a lot addition

50 - 55

S-09-17-S - George Desrochers - Concession 10, Part Lot 13 Consent to create a lot addition S-11-17-S _ George Desrochers - Concession 10, Part Lot 13 Consent to create a lot addition

56 - 61

S-10-17-S - Mark & Julie Richards - Concession 4, Part Lot 18, Greenfield Road - Consent to create a lot addition

62 - 64

S-12-17-S - David Cliff - Concession 1, Part Lot 18/19, Holmes Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot S-13-17-S - David Cliff - Concession 1, Part Lot 18/19, Holmes Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot

65 - 71

S-14-17-L - Don & Claudette Quintal - Concession 6, Part Lot 11, Hogan Road, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a lot addition

72 - 77

S-15-17-L - Estate of John Francis Koen - Concession 7, Part Lot 24/25, North Shore Road, District of Loughborough - Consent to

78 - 83

Page 1 of 174

create a new lot g)

S-16-17-L - Krista Veryzer, Paul Rapin - Concession 6, Part Lot 4, Rosedale Road, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a new lot

84 - 87

S-17-17-S - K. Mulrooney Trucking - Concession 7, Part Lot 37/38, Frontenac Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot S-18-17-S - K. Mulrooney Trucking - Concession 7, Part Lot 37/38, Frontenac Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot

88 - 92

S-19-17-S - 1324782 Ontario Inc. - Concession 7, Part Lot 36/37, Battersea Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot S-20-17-S - 1324782 Ontario Inc. - Concession 7, Part Lot 36/37, Battersea Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot S-21-17-S - 1324782 Ontario Inc. - Concession 7, Part Lot 36/37, Battersea Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot

93 - 99

New Minor Variance Applications:

MV-16-17-L - Richard Parslow - Concession 10, Part Lot 19, Trotter Road, District of Loughborough - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water, within 15m from top of bank, within 20m front yard setback, within 3m side yard setback

100 105

MV-17-17-B - Norman & Goretti Silva - Concession 7, Part Lot 32, Fairhaven Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit an increase in height of an accessory building

106 116

MV-18-17-S - Janet Brown - Concession 10, Part Lot 17/18, Huntbach Lane, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

117 122

MV-19-17-B - Steven & Cindy Ryckman - Concession 10, Part Lot 9, West Devil Lake Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

123 128

MV-20-17-B - Paul & Janice McNichols - Concession 3, Part Lot 7, McNichols Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit an increase in height of an accessory building

129 131

MV-21-17-S - Nicholas Harvey - Concession 9, Part Lot 19, Ormsbee Road, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

132 137

MV-22-17-B - Roger Brice - Concession 13, Part Lot 8, Perth Road, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

138 140

MV-23-17-B - Tony & Michele Kimmett - Concession 10, Part Lot 23/24, Lee Road, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

141 148

Page 2 of 174

MV-24-17-S - Carolyn Anglin - Concession 10, Part Lot 4, Hickory Lane, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction within the 30m setback from water

Other Business

Adjournment

Resolution

149 174

Page 3 of 174

PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT APPLICATION FOR CONSENT

DATE: May 8, 2017

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-28-16-B Robert Bechard & Jamie Maclean Concession 3, Part Lot 2, Sleapview Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary Section 5.8.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit construction within the 30m setback from HWM Date of Hearing: December 8, 2016 SUMMARY This application was brought to the Committee in December, 2016 but was deferred due to a lack of comments from KFL&A Public Health. This application was originally submitted in July 2016 but was deferred from coming to the Committee at the request of the applicant due to an early unfavourable report from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. After reworking the original submission the applicant was able to satisfy the concerns of the CRCA, who now have no objections to the proposal. The subject land consists of a 24.7 +/- hectares (61 acres) with frontage on Desert Lake. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the construction of a new 3,255 square foot footprint two (2) storey dwelling, to be located a minimum of 82.5 feet (25m) on the northern side and a minimum of 30m on the southern side, from the high water mark of Desert Lake. The proposed location is on a peninsula and on the side which is encroaching into the HWM setback the structure will be up against a large rock ridge that will aid in reducing potential environmental impact. The applicant is also planning on constructing a 300 square foot maximum footprint sleeping cabin, but this will be located entirely outside the 30m setback from the HWM. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. Comments from public health have yet to be received, though the applicant has indicated they are planning on installing a new septic system at a minimum distance of 15m from the high water mark of Desert Lake as required by the building code. UPDATE: Comments from Public Health have now been received and they have no objections as the applicant has submitted and received approval to install a new septic system.

FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor?

PLANNING AND AGENCY ANALYSIS & COMMENTS Application No. MV-28-16-B Name of Applicant Robert Bechard & Jamie Maclean Concession 3 Lot 2 District Bedford Purpose To permit construction within 30m of the HWM Zoning RLSW Application complies with Yes zoning OP Designation Rural Application complies with OP Yes CBO Roads N/A Health Unit Cons. Authority No Objections

Page 4 of 174

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a new 3,255 square foot footprint two (2) storey dwelling, to be located a minimum of 82.5 feet (25m) from the high water mark of Desert Lake.
Minor variance MV-28-16-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning bylaws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

Page 5 of 174

µ BECHARD MV-28-16-B

Proposed Sleeping Cabin

Legend Bechard Property Bechard Proposed Buildings

Proposed Cottage

Desert Lake

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 6 of 174

Scale 1:1,000 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

40 Meters

REGEONCONSERVATION AUTHORITY CATARAQUI 1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, Ontario KOH 1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956-CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E-mail:info@crca.ca Websites: www.crca.ca & wvm/.c|eanwatercataraqui.ca

IIIIII

U034‘,

.I.l\pil’\al

Iv I-JIIEU

Page 7 of 174

Page 8 of 174

Page 9 of 174

l l

tjt’+ l

l t I l l-

‘% I

‘/

r4 l

! I

]

-al

J r?

[[a -A l[m # a [1

]

r J

‘,,

flm

(7’l C%I

/ff

ull

S .1?

MNm

l’ffi

-l

!:‘T?JT: ‘?i’oiiTl ‘7’TUf ? U a’cr T

:"?I

‘? ?#-I

ffrjm?

rTn rTTlr71 rTn! iJ -l

l-O- i’?l 11 -ii? li

“%

!?ilp

miax .j

ffi

Page 10 of 174

(/) I n?l

oiTffi :OIO )l>

Kl;2 %l;

ffi

‘jj’H!l!lJu ?’ bl’!

? [

A T

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROJECT:

C r

?j .1

0 l TITLE:

€lm 2i

BECHARD - DESERT LAKE

ll Michael Preston 76 GORE STREET, KINGSTON, ONT. K7L 2L5 . 416-737-2126 . wwvv.mpdesign.ca

ID[$l a [1 M m m

l 11 111 111 l 11 11 111 1111 11 11 I

Page 11 of 174

(/) (j) c

‘ffi

:? –l

l’

‘k ‘11

-l’ff

T’-

! i

L-

I-

g gi igi

J-

!’

-I

:C-

liL

iw g ls

-I

€

[J'7

‘Yffi?

-l

Y m

[

Et s

llC? -N l

]

-?I t-

11 .-i

l[?

E l

[

C’

ffl

[

=—ffi

‘I

1 Y

-1

}

r l 1?

r-?

Page 12 of 174

PFIOPOSED SIDE (WEST) ELEVATION 0)

E l = l z l PROJECT: m i-l ir- i

’ Rol<l A) a)

BECHARD - DESERT LAKE

Ull Michael Preston 76 GORE STREET, KINGSTON, ONT. K7L 2L5 . 416-737-2126 . www.mpdesign.ca

]

[ [

I ‘11’

(?-lJ.’.‘i

i 7/ m;l F ( . / 1 .7,t-?,

‘i

’l

V’

nJ l’lTTll

‘Q71il @0)jjjjj) !]l [i? @

alll?lllf-&!

il f

-7/ . ..-..l…:IIJ,.. u’ J=:,l

‘Zfi

Ti’:11

E[]

t.: ?’.? f

]

l’l

fflL.,,,l.l.?l,‘jE?

l ? ’l

€

1 i

‘2z?< a A

‘,? ’l l l:’ : ’l

“(

‘J

-IC

‘?m

r-?’ " ? ?

(

€

l’ 11 11–1111-illl U

it l’% lr’

?gq??? -’;

[

l’l’

J-

W” fi ’ jTi?’:? '

alIC;

Ii il

-I

t: t l l

11 1([

r I?

‘S

p’i

;.iiii [

‘%

!’!

‘7;

r- ?-’-’==’-

?—–?-l

[

L. . …….— lit

?II

L ffl

‘[1 r

J J

-1

Page 13 of 174

r t

‘%j

PFIOPOSED REAFI (NORTH) ELEVATION

z I z l c-l PROJECTI

‘I!/11-<l

? x’ rCr

?o i :?4 i r- i

BECHARD - DESERT LAKE

Michael Preston 76 GORE STREET, KINGSTON, ONT. K7L 2L5 . 416-737-2126 . wwvv.mpdesign.ca

[I ]Th 11

11!

TERRACE

#ffi

mz ffiffi m€ [‘mz €W zz €[1

JffiL - ,, …. ,,,, ,,, ,, sra L ' l 9’X7.5 ‘, n-+i 8.5’x7.5 COVER(:DPORCH PANTRY l-J i ,l L4UNDFIYMUD 15.5’x7.5” ,l : i l i ——–: ’l l: 11 ff ii l 10’X8’ BATH l ENTRY

, 15.5’X7.5’

il l j il

i 11

l’

l ’l DININGROOM l al’ 11. 11 2{!,l'7’: i 11i .’.xi.,‘j,,“l il:l’’ :l11 11

13’Xi!’

Iq5Xl6

l ’l 11 . i i ii llVNiROOM l l 24’x2a’ i’ i:’-l li l 11’ L—-J ,l l

i i, l l i i . l l l . gi’ ,l, ’ l GUESTiBpDQOOM ‘, KITCHEN i i’i il 11 i l4’x2D’ STUDY

–

-J rKITCHEN l

’l li l 11 11 i l i, ,,, ,,, TERRAC!i l 11 i : COVEFIEDK)RCH ,,, ,, ,, ,,, ,,,,, , ,,,, ,,, ,,,,, i ii :i @’ i 22’xFf l t.-ha r, :. . J m i dra ==h==zz=========z==h==z== nfi , l4’x2D’ i

l -

r%)

(/) 0

ffl

TITLE:

GFIOUND FLOOFI PLAN PFIOPOSAL

C; l

Page 14 of 174

II-

cti c

PROJECT:

BECHARD - DESERT LAKE

,l i

i !, ,, . ,i , . l

13’X7.5

eee

1!X6’

, — - - - ————–J € BATH 8.5!x7.!i’

KIDS’ BEDROOM 15’X14’

o ‘, ‘%, ,a’%, Y .’ .’

7.5’x8’ € . , l

‘. l i BATH

l a l

:l 1.

i ,, nfi ,,+”’: opsuosaow

- - - - '’
-’ - - -,e
rw —u l ii :: il l

11 7’XIO.5’

€

l l ' l , i’ ll e, il l l l 11 l 11 , l i i. ii 11 l il 11

l ' jj ii @ l 11 i

l '

riii-i l

J BALCONY

J 11 Jl

L 11

Page 15 of 174

y m

-I

o :o

TITLE:

SECOND FLOOR PLAN PROPOSAL

(A)

cti o

c ll-

€ 8ATH

’l —- —— —J i i : i i l ’ ’ CLOSET’ 11 l l :: 8.5’XI5’l 11l li

PROJECT:

BECHARD - DESERT LAKE

Page 16 of 174

CATARAQUIREGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY . ““3?”

1“- ‘/’\

1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, Ontario KOH1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1—877—956—CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E—mai|: info@crca.ca Websites: www.crca.ca 8t www.cIeanwatercataraqui.ca

VN‘

Conservation ONTARIO Natural Champions

November 24, 2016

Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Kapusta:

Re:

Application for Minor Variance MV-28-16-B (Bechard Part Lot 2, Concession 3; Sleepview Lane Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Desert Lake

Maclean)

Staff of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance as well as the revised drawing submitted by Michael Preston and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. Additional comments to our previous correspondence ofA ugust 12, 2016 is provided in bold italic

fontfor easy reference. Summary of the Proposal The proposal involves the construction of a new 302 square metre single family dwelling on the subject property. The variance is requested to: 0

Reduce the required setback from the high water mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.(1.) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 26.21 metres in order to permit the construction of a single family dwelling.

Site Description The property is located on the north-west shore of Desert Lake. As this is a large property (24.68 ha), the topography of the property can be described as variable. However, the shoreline can be characterized as being predominately Precambrian shield consisting of high rock outcrop.

The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan for the Township of South Frontenac and zoned ‘Rural’ (RU) in the implementing Zoning By-law. Desert Lake is classi?ed as a moderately sensitive Lake Trout lake in the Of?cial Plan.

Page 17 of 174

Page 18 of 174

Page 19 of 174

Environmental Health Department 1130 Elizabeth Street Sharbot Lake, Ontario KOH2P0 (613) 279-2151

Public Health REQUESTSFOR COMMENTS

Fai§Ei‘§(i§i6277’;:7§’97 http://www.kflapublichealthca

Mr. Lindsay Mills Secretary—Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac PO 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON 2T0

To;

Application Number:

MV-28—16B

Type of Application

Applicant Name(s):

Bechard, Robert Part Lot 2, Concession 3, Bedford District Sleepview Lane

Location:

Planning Department or Agency:

c°mmentS_

Minor Variance

or Proposal:

Township of South Frontenac (Bedford)

KFL&APublic Health has no objections to the proposed minor variance as the owners have submitted an application under permit number BE—5—17. The septic system to be included in the minor variance, refer to BE-5-17 (60 feet from the high water mark).

Ins P ector’ Date:

urnfkl-I‘l(C),VF’ub|ic Healhtxlnspector April 27, 2016

PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1~800-267-7875.

Page 20 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-08-17-B Kevin and Harriet Cove Concession 6, Part Lot 32, Island Drive Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary Section 5.8.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit construction within the 30m setback from HWM Date of Hearing: March 9, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction within the required 30m setback from the high water mark be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND This item was originally brought to the Committee in March, 2017 but was deferred pending receipt of a report from KFL&A public health. This item was returned to the Committee in April, 2017 but there were continuing questions regarding the size, shape and depth of the proposed parking area, along with questions over exact building placement. These concerns have been address by the applicant via email (see attached) The subject land consists of a 0.38 +/- acres with frontage on Bobs Lake. The lot is currently developed with a 100 square foot storage shed, a 10 square foot outhouse, and a 100 square foot deck with attached drawbridge style dock. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing storage shed and the construction of 25 ft. by 30 ft. (750 square foot) two story seasonal dwelling to be located a minimum of 55 feet from the high water mark (HWM) of Bob’s Lake. Also proposed is the construction of an 8 ft. by 16 ft. (128 square foot) storage shed to be located a minimum of 120 feet from the HWM and the construction of a gravelled 30 foot by 50 foot parking area to be located along the eastern edge of the property. The proposed location for the septic system is a minimum of 90 feet from the HWM. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor?

Page 21 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Rideau Valley Conservation Authority has no objections to the proposal provided the best management practices in the attached report dated February 23, 2017 are followed. The building department has no objections. KFL&A Public Health have no objections as a septic permit application has been submitted by the applicant. Comments from roads were not required.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the demolition of the existing storage shed and the construction of a 750 square foot two (2) story dwelling to be located a minimum of 55 feet from the high water mark of Bob’s Lake.
Minor variance MV-08-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Cove Property RVCA Report Dated February 23, 2017. Cove Email Response Dated April 30, 2017

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 22 of 174

µ 306 Island Drive Lane N LA IS

E IV

COVE MV-08-17-B

Legend Cove Property Proposed Cove Cottage Proposed Shed Proposed Gravel Parking Area Existing Buildings

Proposed Cottage

Page 23 of 174

307 Island Drive Lane

Scale 1:375

Bobs Lake 0

1.75 3.5

10.5

14 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

KI:

Public Health REQUESTSFOR COMMENTS

Environmental Health Department 1130 Elizabeth Street Sharbot Lake, Ontario KOH2P0 (613) 279-2151

Fa:jgj32)527;;§37;97 http://www.kf|apublichealth.ca

To;

Application Number: Type of Application

or Proposal:

Applicant Name(s):

Mr. Lindsay Mills Secretary—Treasurer,Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac PO 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON 2T0 MV—08—17B

Minor Variance

Cove, Kevin & Harriet

Locatlom

Lot 32, Concession 6, Bedford District 305 Island Drive

Planning Department or Agency:

Township of South Frontenac (Bedford)

Comments:

KFL&APublic Health has no objections to the proposed minor variance as the owner has submitted an application under permit number BE-2-17.

Inspector:

Date:

April 10, 2017

PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613)549-1232 ext. 1243 or 17800-267-7875.

Page 24 of 174

CON

RIDEAUVALLEY TION AUTHORITY

3889 Rideau Valley Drive,PO Box 599, Manotick, ON K4M1A5 tel 613-692-3571 1 1»ao0—2a7-3504 l fax6’I3v692-0831 4 www.Nca.ca

February 23, 2017 17-SFR-MV-Bed Township of South Frontenac Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Attention: Lindsay Mills Subject:

COVE MinorVariance Application MV-08-17-B in Part Lot 32, Concession 6, South Frontenac-Bedford Ward- 305 Island Drive

Dear Mr. Mills: Further to our site visit in the fall of 2016, the RVCA offers the following comments for the proposed residential development of this lot as it relates to:

2.1 (Natural Heritage) and 2.2 (Water) and 3.1 Natural Hazards (Natural Hazards) of the Provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of the Planning Act. The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority regulations under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, Waterfront setbacks and best management practices per the Municipal Site Evaluation Guidelines” (revised 2015) derived from the “Rideau Lakes Study”(1993); the Rideau Lakes Study considers the effects of development on phosphorous loading and the protection of recreational water quality on waterbodies within the Upper Rideau watershed. Tay Subwatershed Report- Bobs Lake catchment summary. “

Our review for development/redevelopment looks to address waterfront disturbance and development setbacks to protect against natural hazards and preclude/limit nutrient and sediment input to our lakes in order to protect recreational water quality. Maintaining existing setbacks and/or advocating for increased water setbacks based on site conditions, lake sensitivity and planning standards set out in the Zoning By Law and Of?cial Plan of the Township are key considerations in this regard. The Proposal The application proposes to construct a 2-storey 69.7 square metre footprint cottage (total 139.4 square metres living area) situated 18.3 metres from the high water mark of Bobs Lake at the location of the existing 10 square metre structure. The proposal also seeks approval for a new septic and 11.9 square metre storage shed.

Page 1 of 3

Page 25 of 174

The Property and Site Conditions The site is relatively small and the site is steepened, slope to the water ranging from 20-25%. Mature hardwood scatter the site, though vegetation has been disturbed for parking and use around the unserviced structure which are currently situated on the upper area of the lot. Soil cover is fast draining and shallow. An informal path and steps provides access to the water.

From a more general perspective, our recent Tay Subwatershed Report and Bob’s Lake Catchment Report indicates that West Basin may be characterized as a lake with clear waters and moderate nutrient levels. The lake generally has good aesthetics for recreational use. While the lake is generally considered to be healthy, there is a potential for it to be impacted by increased nutrient loading which may result in increased aquatic vegetation and algal blooms, particularly as the season progresses. The report encourages individual landowners to practice good stewardship for full lake characterization and details). practices (see our website- www.rvca.ca— There are no provincially significant wetlands in the immediate vicinity. Given the steep waterfront grades, this lot is minimally affected at the shoreline by the 1:100 flood elevation (163.07 metres geodetic).

Discussion

and Recommendations

The Conservation Authority, in co—operationwith the Township, encourages redevelopment to address the water setbacks strictly. In this case, we do recognize that the alternatives for development are limited and the proposed residence and septic service is situated. The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority does not object to this proposal with the following best management practices included;

Surface and roof water runoff management shall be implemented by directing runoff from eaves trough placement and outlets to allow for maximum in?ltration of roof runoff away from the waterfront and services. In?ltration pits/areas along with rain barrels should be incorporated in the site plan.

Site runoff controls downgrade of construction must be installed (such as straw bales and sediment fence) to the satisfaction of the Building Official prior to commencement of work and remain in place until the site is stable (soil and vegetation cover is restored).

Con?rmation that there will be no notable grade changes as a result of this development. Maintenance of the waterfront vegetative buffer with native forest cover except for the pedestrian access path to the dock/water. This willassist in controlling the drift of nutrient, particularly phosphorous, to the lake. Preserving an extensive and stable vegetation buffer willaid in protecting the |ake’s water quality and habitat in the long term. The RVCA supports the installation of a tertiary treatment system situated to assist in approaching the municipal water setback as closely as possible. No permit is required from our office for this residential development as proposed.

Page 2 of 3

Page 26 of 174

Please note that the shoreline of Bob’s Lake is subject to Ontario Regulation 174/06 Development, Interference with Wetlands, Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation made pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act. Any new/proposed shoreline work will require a permit from the RVCA. Please advise us on the Committee’s decision or any changes in the status of the application. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please don’t hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions.

Yours truly,

Q ,..o.

li,_oI.—.+~

Ell Martha Bradburn RVCA Environmental Planner 613 267 5353 x131 cc- K and H Cove (khcove@spmnet.com) -KFLA DHU (J. McGurn)

Page 3 of 3

Page 27 of 174

Legend

305 Island Drive, Bedford

Applicable Law Addresses Parcel - Assesment Lot RVCA Admin Boundary Regulation Limit 100yr Floodline Reg Limit Dominant Hazard Floodplain Geo-technical Hazard Limit Meander Belt Stable Slope Top of Slope Unstable Slope Wetland

Provincially Significant Wetland + 120m 100yr Floodline + 15m Top of Slope + 15m Unstable Slope + 15m Stable Slope + 15m Regulated Wetlands Municipal Drains OHN Watercourse Ottawa Parcels Former Municipalities Spot Height DRAPE 2014 50cm 1m 50 cm

Wetlands Evaluated-Provincial (PSW)

564

28.7

Page 28 of 174

20.3

1: 399 0

10.13

20.3 Meters Map created: 2/23/2017

Map produced by RVCA, under License with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016. This map is the property of the RVCA, and the RVCA holds a copyright on them. These maps may be copied or reproduced, provided that the RVCA is properly acknowledged as the original source of the information and provided that no fee is charged (other than to cover handling charges). The RVCA cannot guarantee the accuracy of the mapping for all possible uses. End-users of the information contained herein must therefore determine if the information is of suitable accuracy for their purposes

WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary _Sphere

Jennie Kapusta From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Cove, Kevin (Allentown) USA Kevin.Cove@htcnam.com April-30-17 11:04 AM Jennie Kapusta; Lindsay Mills khcove@sprynet.com RE: Notice of Deferral 2017 Cove, Kevin-Prelim Finals REV2.pdf

Dear Jennie and Lindsay, Thank you very much for the continued discussions. I must say that I am somewhat disappointed in the reaction of our neighbours and their concerns related to our planned parking area. The east gravel area is the last remaining relatively flat area that we have to be able to pull in a vehicle with a boat trailer now that the cottage is located in the northwest part of the property at the request of the Conservation Authority. This was the original area planned for parking but is now mostly consumed by the cottage. The east gravel parking area will be as minimalistic as possible with the only purpose to be able to pull in a couple of vehicles and to get a boat trailer turned around. There will be no retaining wall and approximately 5 to 6 inches of gravel (likely 2 inch stone). We will keep the plan area as small as possible. The gravel is needed so that I don’t dig into the soil and create any silting issues and will be kept as small as possible. We don’t want a place that requires maintenance and has the lowest possible impact to the area/environment (i.e. we would also prefer trilliums and natural vegetation and shorelines as opposed to lawns that require cutting and imported sand beaches). I have also attached our preliminary plans for the cottage for your review. Thanks again for your consideration. Harriet and I would very much appreciate receiving approval for the minor variance application during your May 11 meeting, allowing us to submit for a building permit as soon as possible as our construction schedule will be tight with regards to having the cottage enclosed before late fall. Best regards, Kevin Cove P.E., P. Eng. Director Project Engineering Heidelberg Technology Center Lehigh Cement Company LLC 7660 Imperial Way Allentown, PA 18195 Direct 610 366-4732 Cell 484 632-9992 Kevin Cove

From: Jennie Kapusta [mailto:jkapusta@southfrontenac.net] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 9:07 AM 1

Page 29 of 174

To: Cove, Kevin (Allentown) USA Subject: Notice of Deferral

Good Morning, Please find attached a copy of the notice of deferral from the committee. Despite all the reports being in and favourable they have elected to defer your application pending a site visit of the members and more information regarding the gravel parking area proposed and its impact on the drainage on to your neighbour’s property. There were concerns raised by neighbours over the size and scope of the proposed graveled area and how it will alter the runoff. They were also concerned given the nature of the topography in the area that the gravel placed on your property will be washed onto their property. There was discussion on construction of a retaining wall, a reduction in size of the gravel area, and exactly where the cottage was going to be built. Do you have any further details on the size and scope of the proposed graveled parking area? How deep the gravel is going to be? Is a retaining wall going to be necessary? From my memory of the site visit I thought it was fairly flat in the parking area location, but your abutting neighbours have raised these concerns. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Regards, Jennie Kapusta Planning Assistant

Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street, P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0 P: 613-376-3027 x.2224 jkapusta@southfrontenac.net www.southfrontenac.net

Confidential: This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the email immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosing, copying, distributing or using the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited.

Page 30 of 174

23829 BCIN Qualification Information

SIGNATURE

04-02-2017

[2 PLY] [3 PLY]

Blake Waugh NAME

[2 PLY] [3 PLY]

02-13-2017

[3 PLY] [3 PLY]

01-24-2017

2"x8” P.T. #1/#2 SPF 2"x10" #1/#2 SPF 1.75"x9.5" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x9.5" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x9.5" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x11.875" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x11.875" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x11.875" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x14" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x14" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x14" LVL 2.0E

D = DEPTH OF EARTH COVER ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFIC NOTES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND RAWN THROUGH THE LEADING GENERAL NOTES. THE DESIGNER SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR CLARIFICATION IF SITE CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN SHOWN, IF DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE PLANS OR

Typ. Deck Framing [Flush Beam]

DING FROM THE OR VERTICAL AND ARISES OVER THE INTENT OF THE PLANS OR NOTES. NOTES, IF A QUESTION

EXTERIOR GUARDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER SB-7 OF OBC, OR THE DESIGNER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY PROVIDE FOR SCHEDULING, FABRICATION, P.ENG APPROVAL IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ,MATERIALS, OR QUANTITIES USED IN THE WORK. THE DESIGNER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR FIELD CHANGES, SITE VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES.

GENERAL NOTES

ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE
FOUNDATION AND TRUSS DESIGN SHALL BE VERIFIED BY A QUALIFIED ENGINEER FOR COMPLIANCE L WITH SITE REQUIREMENTS.
DIMENSIONS AND NOTES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE SCALING OF DRAWINGS. RAIL
WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE EXTERIOR OF SHEETING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. S
LUMBER COMING IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY SHALL BE TREATED OR PROTECTED WITH AN APPROVED VAPOR BARRIER.
CONTINUOUS CONTACT WITH THE GROUND SHALL BE TREATED TO A MINIMUM OF .60 CCA.
ALL FRAMING LUMBER TO BE #2 OR BETTER SPF OR EQUIVALENT, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. G
EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR MATERIALS AND FINISHES TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. SIZE / SPACING AS PER PLAN
DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS.
ALL MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO OBC AND SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS.
MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SHALL CONFORM TO PROVINCIAL AND MUNICIPAL CODES AND BY-LAWS.
THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. AS PER PLAN
ELECTRICAL FIXTURE LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY SITE SUPERVISOR AND OWNER PRIOR TO WIRING HOMES.
COLD AIR RETURNS SHALL BE LOCATED AT CEILING LEVEL.
HALF WALLS SHALL BE 42" HIGH CAPPED WITH MDF & PAINTED. AS PER PLAN
ROOF TRUSS SUPPLIER TO REVIEW TRUSS FRAMING AND GIRDER TRUSS LOCATIONS ASSUMED AND SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. TRUSS SUPPLIER TO PROVIDE THEIR PROPOSED ROOF LAYOUT FOR REVIEW AND INCORPORATION DJUSTABLE POST BASE WHERE NECESSARY, PRIOR TO ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SUBMISSION FOR BUILDING PERMIT. BUILDING PERFORMANCE
ALL EXHAUST FANS TO BE VENTED DIRECTLY TO THE EXTERIOR.
ALL PENETRATIONS OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE SEALED WITH POLYURETHANE FOAM.
ALL COMBUSTION APPLIANCES WILL BE VENTED DIRECTLY TO THE EXTERIOR.
FURNACE FIREBOX SHALL HAVE OUTSIDE COMBUSTION AIR SUPPLY PURSUANT TO REGIONAL AND LOCAL CODES.

x12" PAD CONCRETE FTG. ED ON FNDN DRWGS

MIN. GRADE DEPTH OF FOOTINGS FOR FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE 5'0" BELOW GRADE FOR ADEQUATE FROST PROTECTION OR PROVIDE A GEO-TECH ENG REPORT STATING OTHERWISE.
ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AS PER TABLE 9.4.4.1 OF 2012 OBC. 2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE
WHEN A FNDN WALL CONTAINS AN OPENING MORE THAN 3'11" IN LENGTH OR CONTAINS OPENINGS INSULATION (DOW SM OR EQUIV.) IN MORE THAN 25% OF ITS LENGTH, THAT PORTION OF THE WALL SHALL BE CONSIDERED LATERALLY UNSUPPORTED, UNLESS THE WALL AROUND 2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE THE OPENING IS REINFORCED. INSULATION HI 40 OR EQUIV.)
DRAINAGE LAYER SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE EXT. SURFACE OF(DOW A FOUNDATION WALL WHERE THE INSULATION EXTENDS TO MORE THAN 2'11" BELOW THE ADJACENT EXTERIOR GROUND LEVEL. (9.14.2.1)
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND AIR CONTENT MUST COMPLY WITH 2012 OBC 9.3.1.6.
32 MPA CONCRETE SHALL BE USED FOR GARAGE AND EXT. FLATWORK 9.3.1.6. MASONRY APPROVED SUBGRADE
STEEL ANGLE LINTELS SUPPORTING MASONRY SHALL BE PRIME PAINTED 9.20.5.2(5) (FROST SUSCEPTIBLE)
FLASHING ON MASONRY WALLS MUST BE INSTALLED BENEATH JOINTED MASONRY SILLS, OVER THE BACK AND TOP OF PARAPET WALLS, OVER THE HEADS OF GLASS BLOCK PANELS, AND BENEATH WEEP HOLES, AND OVER THE HEADS OF DOORS AND WINDOWS IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TOP OF THE OPENING AND THE BOTTOM OF THE EAVE EXCEEDS 1/4 OF THE EAVE OVERHANG.
THROUGH WALL FLASHING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN MASONRY VENEER WALL IN SUCH THAT, ANY MOISTURE THAT ACCUMULATES IN THE AIR SPACE, WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE EXT. OF THE BUILDING.
WEEP HOLES MUST NOT BE SPACED MORE THAN 2'7" APART AND BE PROVIDED AT THE BOTTOM OF EVERY CAVITY IN MASONRY VENEER.

EARTH COVER

2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (DOW HI 40 OR EQUIV.)

APPROVED SUBGRADE (FROST SUSCEPTIBLE)

D = DEPTH OF EARTH COVER ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING L = REQUIRED PROJECTION OF THE INSULATION IN AREAS WITH LESS THAN 1.5 m OF EARTH COVER. T = THICKNESS OR NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOOTING.

NOTES;

DOORS & WINDOWS

THE SURFACE BENEATH THE INSULATION SHOULD BE FLAT TO ENSURE THE STYROFOAM DOES NOT SPLIT OR BREAK. IF DOW THAT HI40, OR EQUIV. IS THAN USED 23-5/8" BENEATH THE FOOTING. A MAXIMUM

DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING4)DOORS OPEN MORE ABOVE GROUND OR A LANDING SHALL HAVE A RESTRICTED ALLOWABLE PRESSURE OPENING OR BE PROVIDED WITH GUARDS,BEARING MAX OPENING 4". OF 90 KPA SHOULD BE USED, PROVIDED THAT THE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSUREIN OFCONFORMANCE THE UNDERLYING
PROVISIONS FOR RESISTANCE TO FORCED ENTRY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OBC 9.7.5.2 AND 9.7.5.3 SUBGRADE EXCEEDS 90 KPA.
WINDOW WELLS SHALL BE DRAINED TO THE FOOTING LEVEL OR OTHER SUITABLE LOCATION 9.14.6.3.

PROPOSED GRADE

HEATED SPACE

INSULATION JOINTS TO BE TIGHTLY BUTT JOINED OR SHIP LAPPED
FOR ADEQUATE FROST PROTECTION D + L + T > 1.5 M
THE SURFACE BENEATH THE INSULATION SHOULD BE FLAT TO ENSURE THE STYROFOAM DOES NOT SPLIT OR BREAK.
IF DOW HI40, OR EQUIV. IS USED BENEATH THE FOOTING. A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 90 KPA SHOULD BE USED, PROVIDED THAT THE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF THE UNDERLYING SUBGRADE EXCEEDS 90 KPA.

TYP. CONC. FLOOR SLAB 4. WINDOWS SHALL BE DOUBLE PANE, PVC AND CONFORM TO CAN/CSA-A440 L MANUFACTURER AND COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. 5. EVERY BEDROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN EGRESS WINDOW WITH FINISH SILL HEIGHT NOT GREATER THAN 44" ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR HEIGHT AND SHALL HAVE A COMPACTED GRANULAR MINIMUM OPERABLE AREA OF 5.7 SQ. FT. EGRESS WINDOWS SHALL NOT HAVE AN D T (NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE) OPERABLE AREA LESS THAN 20" WIDE OR 24" HIGH. L 6. SAFETY GLAZING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN DOORS AND ENCLOSURES FOR HOT TUBS, 2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE APPROVED SUBGRADE WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM ROOMS, BATHTUBS, AND SHOWERS. INSULATION (DOW SM OR EQUIV.) (FROST SUSCEPTIBLE) 7. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH WEATHER RESISTANT COATINGS AND WEATHER STRIPPED. COMPACTED GRANULAR PLUMBING 8. DOORS BETWEEN GARAGE AND LIVING AREA SHALL BE 1-3/4" TIGHT FITTING SOLID CORE DOORS WITH A RATING OF 20 MINUTES. (NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE) DOOR SHALL BE SELF CLOSING.

THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLUMBING SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO PART 7 OF THE OBC.
AIN ENTRANCE DOORS TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH, A DOOR VIEWER OR
SERVICE WATER HEATERS SHALL BE ANCHORED TO THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT OVERTURNING. TRANSPARENT GLAZING IN THE DOOR, OR A SIDELIGHT.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT BASEMENT FLOOR DRAINS AND OTHER BASEMENT FITTINGS BE PROVIDED WITH APPROPRIATE CHECK
INTERIOR DOORS TO BE PRE-PRIMED MDF. STYLE AND FINISH BY OWNER. DEVICES TO PREVENT AGAINST BACK FLOW FROM STREET SEWERS 7.4.6.4
GARAGE DOORS TO BE SECTIONAL, OVERHEAD DOORS, MATERIALS AND FINISH TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER.
ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A SLIGHT SLOPE TO ALLOW FOR WINTERIZING (DRAINAGE) AT FLOOR DRAIN IN MECH.
EXCEPT WHERE A DOOR ON THE SAME FLOOR LEVEL AS THE BEDROOM PROVIDES DIRECT ACCESS TO THE EXTERIOR, EVERY ROOM FLOOR LEVEL CONTAINING A BEDROOM IN A SUITE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE OUTSIDE WINDOW THAT CAN BE OPENED FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT USE OF TOOLS AND SUCH WINDOW SHALL PROVIDE AN INDIVIDUAL, UNOBSTRUCTED PORTION FLOORING HAVING A MINIMUM AREA OF .35 M2 WITH NO DIMENSION LESS THAN 15" 9.7.1.3
FINISHED FLOORING IN BATHROOMS, KITCHEN, LAUNDRY ROOMS, GENERAL STORAGE AREAS AND ENTRANCES SHALL BE WATER RESISTANT 9.30.1.2.
CERAMIC TILE INSTALLED AS PER 9.30.6 FIREPLACE

Page 31 of 174

FIREPLACE, FIREPLACE INSERTS, WOODSTOVE AND/OR CHIMNEY TO BE ULC LISTED AND INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURERS’ SPECIFICATIONS.
ALL OTHER APPLIANCES TO BE ULC LISTED AND INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.
FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES AND THEIR INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO ULC S 610 " STANDARD FOR FACTORY BUILT FIREPLACES. ELECTRICAL NOTES: HOME OWNER SHALL DO A WALK-THRU WITH RELEVANT INSTALLERS TO VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION FOR OUTLETS, LIGHTS, SWITCHES, CABLE, DATA, PHONE, AUDIO, ETC.

Concept Layout

Sketches

Prelim Finals 4

[2 PLY] [3 PLY] [2 PLY] [3 PLY] [2 PLY] [3 PLY]

[DBL TRIMMERS]1) INSULATION JOINTS TO BE TIGHTLY BUTT JOINED OR SHIP LA [DBL TRIMMERS]2) FOR ADEQUATE FROST PROTECTION D + L + T > 1.5 M 3) THE SURFACE BENEATH THE INSULATION SHOULD BE FLAT TO [DBL TRIMMERS] THE STYROFOAM DOES NOT SPLIT OR BREAK. [DBL TRIMMERS]4) IF DOW HI40, OR EQUIV. IS USED BENEATH THE FOOTING. A M ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 90 KPA SHOULD BE USE [DBL TRIMMERS] THAT THE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF THE UNDERLY HEATED SPACE [DBL TRIMMERS] SUBGRADE EXCEEDS 90 KPA. TYP. CONC. FLOOR SLAB

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11

BEAM POCKET SCHEDULE; BP1

COMPACTED GRANULAR (NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE) APPROVED SUBGRADE (FROST SUSCEPTIBLE)

USP ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT POST MODEL T2JPLD88 [15,500#] 2 - 2"x4", 6", 8" (AS APPLICABLE) 3 - 2"x4", 6", 8" (AS APPLICABLE) 4 - 2"x4", 6", 8" (AS APPLICABLE) 5 - 2"x4", 6", 8" (AS APPLICABLE) USP ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT POST MODEL T2JPHD96 [32,100#] USP ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT POST MODEL T2JPLD96 [13,600#] 6"x6" P.T. POST 6"x6" P.T. POST ON 10" DIA. SONOTUBE 8"x8" POST. 4"x4" P.T. POST.

NOTES;

SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER 9.10.19

INSULATION JOINTS TO BE TIGHTLY BUTT JOINED OR SHIP LAPPED

SMOKE ALARM SHALL BE LOCATED AS PER 9.10.19.3

FOR ADEQUATE FROST PROTECTION D + L + T > 1.5 M

6-1/4"x10-3/4" BEAM POCKET w/ min. 4" BRG.

SF TOTALS; Foundation Layout Main Floor Plan Loft Plan Screen Porch Decks

= 720 sf = 720 sf = 163 sf = 144 sf = 293 sf

DATE: 4/17/2017 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0" SHEET:

ATTIC ACCESS

A MINIMUM OF 22" X 36". THERE SHALL BE 30" MIN. CLEARANCE AT OR ABOVE THE OPENING.
LOCATED IN A CORRIDOR, HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. ATTICS WITH A MAXIMUM VERTICAL HEIGHT OF LESS THAN 30" WILL NOT REQUIRE ACCESS OPENINGS
HATCHWAYS TO ATTIC OR ROOF SPACES SHALL BE FITTED WITH DOORS OR COVERS

2"x10" #1/#2 SPF 2"x10" #1/#2 SPF 1.75"x9.5" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x9.5" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x11.875" LVL 2.0E 1.75"x11.875" LVL 2.0E D

POST SCHEDULE;

COMPACTED GRANULAR (NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE)

UNDER FLOOR SPACES SHALL HAVE VENTILATION EQUAL TO ONE SQ. FOOT PER 150 SQ. FEET OF T = THICKNESS OR NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE ENGINEERED FILL FLOOR SPACE. VENTS SHALL BE CAST INTO THE CONCRETE STEM WALLS AND COVERED WITH BELOW FOOTING. GALVANIZED WIRE SCREEN. VENTS SHALL BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION.
EXTERIOR FINISH TO BE SIDING OVER OSB. MATERIAL AND COLOR BY OWNER.
ROOFING TO BE LIGHT WEIGHT SHINGLES OVER OSB C/W CLIPS.
CHIMNEY HEIGHT SHALL BE DETERMINED USING A 10’ RADIUS PLANE AND SHALL BE 2’ HIGHER THAN ANY ROOF SURFACE 10’ FROM THE CHIMNEY.
DOWNSPOUTS TO BE COLLECTED AND ROOF RUN OFF TO BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURE.
FINISH GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE MIN. 1/2" PER FOOT OF RUN FOR 4’ MIN.
CONTROL OF RAIN WATER PENETRATION AS PER 9.20.13
ALL AIR BARRIERS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS AND PROPERLY SEALED, AS PER MANUF. SPECS.
EAVE PROTECTION REQUIRED ON SHINGLE, SHAKE OR TILE ROOFS EXTENDING FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROOF A MINIMUM OF 2'11" UP THE ROOF SLOPE TO A LINE NOT LESS THAN 11-3/4" INSIDE THE INNER FACE OF THE EXT. WALL 9.26.5.
ROOF VENTILATION IS REQUIRED AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER 9.19.1.2

2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (DOW SM OR EQUIV.)

WHERE INSULATION IS INSTALLED BETWEEN A CEILING AND THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF SHEATHING, A SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE INSULATION AND THE SHEATHING, AND VENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PERMIT THE MOVEMENT OF AIR D = DEPTH OF EARTH COVER ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING FROM THE SPACE TO THE EXTERIOR. TYP. RAILING

ATTIC SHALL HAVE VENTILATION EQUAL TO 1 SQ. FOOT PER 150 SQ. FEET OF ATTIC SPACE. L = REQUIRED PROJECTION OF THE INSULATION IN BE AREAS WITH TO VENTILATION SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SNOW AND RAIN. OPENINGS SHALL LOCATED LESS THAN 1.5 m OF EARTH COVER. PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION.

THERMAL & MOISTURE

NOTES;

L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6

DENOTES FLUSH LINTEL FJP - REFER TO JOIST PLAN L

INSULATION JOINTS TO BE TIGHTLY BUTT JOINED OR SHIP LAPPED
FOR ADEQUATE FROST PROTECTION D + L + T > 1.5 M
THE SURFACE BENEATH THE INSULATION SHOULD BE FLAT TO ENSURE THE STYROFOAM DOES NOT SPLIT OR BREAK.
IF DOW HI40, OR EQUIV. IS USED BENEATH THE FOOTING. A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 90 KPA SHOULD BE USED, PROVIDED THAT THE ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF THE UNDERLYING SUBGRADE EXCEEDS 90 KPA.

2" THICK EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (DOW SM OR EQUIV.)

FRAMING

SILL PLATES SHALL BE SET IN A FULL BED OF MORTAR, UNLESS TOP OF FNDN WALL IS FLAT. 9.23.7.2 AND SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 9.25.3.
MOISTURE BARRIER SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL AREAS WHERE WOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR UNIT MASONRY LOCATED BELOW GRADE 9.23.2.3.
SPANS AND SIZES OF WOOD LINTELS SHALL CONFORM TO 9.23.12.3 (TABLES A-12 TO A-16)
WALLS STUDS SHALL CONFORM TO TABLES A-30 TO A-37.
STEEL LINTELS FOR MASONRY VENEER SHALL CONFORM TO TABLE 9.20.5.2B.
ROOF TRUSSES SHALL NOTE BE NOTCHED, DRILLED OR OTHERWISE WEAKENED UNLESS ALLOWED IN THE DESIGN 9.23.5.5.
ALL FLOOR JOISTS MUST BE CALCULATED AS SIMPLY SUPPORTED FOR THE FOLLOWING LOADS LL = 40PSF, DL = 15PSF, DEFLECTION = L/360.
STUD WALL REINFORCEMENT IN THE MAIN BATHROOM FOR FUTURE INSTALLATION OF GRAB BAR AS PER 9.5.2.3.
ALL STAIR OPENINGS TO BE FRAMED WITH SOLID COMPONENT NO LESS THAN 1-3/4" THICK.
THE CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL PROVIDED AN EFFECTIVE BARRIER AGAINST GAS AND EXHAUST FUMES AND THE DOOR BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING, WEATHERSTRIPPED AND HAVE A SELF CLOSING DEVICE.
ALL PWF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED AS PER CAN/CSA S406.1

NOTES;

VENTILATION

SMOKE ALARMS TYP. DECK DETAIL

RADE

HEAT LOSS CALCULATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL CODES.
PORCHES AND GARAGE AREAS NOT INCLUDED IN LIVING AREA. NOTUBE, ABOVE GRADE)

TYP. DECK DETAIL

NO.

REQUIRED RESULTING FROM CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED AT THE JOB SITE AND IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER

/ CONTRACTOR. Y THE GUARD IS NOT MORE THAN

STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE A MIN. WIDTH OF 35" MEASURED BETWEEN WALL FACES OR GUARDS. FINISHED GRADE
TREADS SHALL HAVE A MIN. DEPTH OF 9-1/4". STAIR TREADS MUST BE UNIFORM AND CAN NOT VARY (MIN. 8" SONOTUBE, ABOVE GRADE) FROM THE LARGEST TO THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 1/4".
STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE MIN. 6’-5" OF HEADROOM AT THE NOSE OF THE STAIR.
STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL LOCATED 34" TO 38" ABOVE THE NOSING OF TREADS AND LANDINGS. THE HAND GRIP OF HANDRAILS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1-1/2" OR GREATER THAN 10"PORTION SONOTUBE 2" IN CROSS-SECTIONAL DIMENSION.
HANDRAILS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS THE FULL LENGTH OF THE STAIRS. THE ENDS OF HANDRAILS RETURN TO WALL TYP. 24"x24"x12" PAD FTG. OR TERMINATE INTO A NEWEL POST OR SAFETY TERMINAL. OR ASDO NOTED ON FNDN DRWGS
STAIRWAYS HAVING LESS THAN 2 RISERS NOT REQUIRE A HAND RAIL.
35" MIN. HEIGHT GUARDRAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AT PORCHES, DECKS, BALCONIES, STAIRWAYS LANDINGS WHERE THE ADJACENT SURFACE IS GREATER THAN 24" BELOW.
RAILING AND GUARDRAIL BALUSTER SPACING SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 4".
THE TRIANGULAR OPENINGS FORMED BY THE RISER, TREAD, AND BOTTOM OF GUARDRAIL SHALL NOT ALLOW A 4" DIAMETER SPHERE TO PASS THROUGH.
NOSING FOR STAIRS SHALL BE ROUNDED OR BEVELED AND CONFORM TO 9.8.4.6.
AN EXT. GUARDS MUST BE A MIN. HEIGHT OF 2'11" IF THE WALKING SURFACE IS LESS THAN 5'11" ABOVE THE ADJACENT GRADE OTHERWISE THE HEIGHT MUST BE A MIN. 42". ALL REQ’D GUARDS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS MUST BE A MIN. OF 2'11"
A LANDING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TOP OF STAIRS AS PER 9.8.6.2
GUARDS ARE REQUIRED WHEN THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION OF MORE THAN 23-5/8" BETWEEN THE WALKING SURFACE AND THE ADJACENT SURFACE. GUARDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LOADING CRITERIA IN PART 4 OF THE OBC OR BE CONSTRUCTED AS SET OUT IN THE OBC 9.8.8 AND SUPPLEMENTARY STANDARD SB-7. FOR METAL GUARDS SUPPLIERS SHOP DRAWINGS MUST BE CERTIFIED FOR DESIGN INSTALLATION CONFORMING TO OBC 4.1.5.15 AND 9.8.8.

T = THICKNESS OR NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOOTING.

STAIRS & RAILINGS

ICF FNDN BY COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION OF A BUILDING FROM THESE DRAWINGS, TYP. THE OWNER AND OR BUILDER ACCEPTS THESE NSTRUCTED AS SET OUT IN THE DRAWINGS AND HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS ALL APPLICABLE NOTES. CASWELL CUSTOM HOME DESIGN SHALL NOT BE P DRAWINGS MUST BE CERTIFIED RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY VARIANCES FROM THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND THE SPECIFICATIONS, OR ADJUSTMENTS

T = THICKNESS OR NON FROST SUSCEPTIBLE ENGINEERED FIL

LINTEL SCHEDULE; SIMPSON ADJUSTABLE POST BASE

General Notes Cover Page

DECK POST AS PER PLAN

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

JOIST HANGERS

L = REQUIRED PROJECTION OF THE INSULATION IN AREAS WITH OF EARTH COVER.

L = REQUIRED PROJECTION OF THE INSULATION IN AREAS WITH LESS THAN 1.5 m OF EARTH COVER.

Concept Layout

TYP. RAILING

DENOTES FLUSH BEAM FJP - REFER TO JOIST PLAN

DESCRIPTION

D = DEPTH OF EARTH COVER ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF FOOTING

DECK BEAM AS PER PLAN

FLOOR SYSTEM THE OWNER / BUILDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECT TYP. SITINGP.ENG OF THIS HOME ON THE PROPERTY. CASWELL CUSTOM HOME DESIGN NO LIABILITY FOR PLANS COMPLYING WITH ZONING REGULATIONS OR LOT CONDITIONS. 23-5/8" BETWEEN THEASSUMES WALKING

UBE

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11

5/4" DECKING DECK JOIST SIZE / SPACING AS PER PLAN

BEAM SCHEDULE;

12" GRACE WATERPROOFING BETWEEN SIDING AND LEDGER

THESE PLANS SHALL NOT LEDGER BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A QUALIFIED DECK FASTENED TO RIMBOARD AS PER TABLE 9.23.3.4 DESIGNER & THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE BUILDER IS EXPECTED TO FOLLOW THESE OBC & (2) 3/8" GALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS AT 32" O.C STAGGERED APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. HE SHALL VERIFY THAT SITE CONDITIONS ARE PROVIDE MINIMUM 1/2" DRAINAGE GAP w/ WASHER CONSISTENT WITH THESE PLANS BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. WHILE THESE PLANS ARE DRAWN TO SHOW THE PROPOSED WORK AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE, SCHEMATIC DETAILS MAY BE USED IN SOME CASES FOR CLARITY. WORK NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE SAME QUALITY AS SIMILAR WORK THAT IS DETAILED.

AREA, ACTUAL (SQ FT) 8.0 9.33 8.0 9.33 14.22 18.0 15.0 267.42

30"x30"x12" CONC. FTG. c/w 3-15M(B) E/W 24"x24"x12" CONC. FTG. c/w 3-15M(B) E/W

SHEET TITLE:

OWNER & BUILDER NOTES

FLOOR SIZE 1 2040DH 1 2440DH 1 1654FX 1 2836DH 1 2854DH 1 3060FX 1 2660FX

DATE

2" X 4" UNDER RAIL 2" X 2" SPINDLES

QTY 1 5 2 1 2 3 7

WINDOW SCHEDULE - MAIN WIDTH HEIGHT R/O DESCRIPTION 24 " 48 " 25"X49" DOUBLE HUNG 28 " 48 " 29"X49" DOUBLE HUNG 18 " 64 " 19"X65" FIXED GLASS 32 " 42 " 33"X43" DOUBLE HUNG 32 " 64 " 33"X65" DOUBLE HUNG 36 " 72 " 37"X73" FIXED GLASS 30 " 72 " 31"X73" FIXED GLASS

F1 F2

01-19-2017

WINDOW SCHEDULE SHALL BE USED FOR APPROX. FRAME SIZE, ALL WINDOWS AND 2" X 6" TOP RAIL DOORS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH MANUFACTURERS SUGGESTED FRAME SIZE & RSO

NUMBER LABEL W01 W01-2040DH W02 W02-2440DH W03 W03-1654FX W06 W06-2836DH W07 W07-2854DH W08 W08-3060FX W09 W09-2660FX TOTALS:

DOOR SCHEDULE - MAIN. FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT R/O DESCRIPTION AREA, ACTUAL (SQ FT) 1 26611 R IN 30 " 83 " 32"X85 1/2" HINGED-GLASS 17.29 1 2668 L IN 30 " 80 " 32"X82 1/2" HINGED-DOOR P05 16.67 1 2668 R IN 30 " 80 " 32"X82 1/2" HINGED-DOOR P05 16.67 1 3068 R EX 36 " 80 " 39"X83" EXT. HINGED-DOOR E03 20.0 1 4068 L/R IN 48 " 80 " 50"X82 1/2" DOUBLE HINGED-DOOR P05 26.67 1 6068 L EX 72 " 80 " 74"X83" EXT. SLIDER-GLASS 40.0 193.97

AREA, ACTUAL (SQ FT) 12.44 16.33 66.09

QTY 1 2 1 1 1 2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

QTY FLOOR SIZE 4 0 2848DH 1 0 4836DC

WINDOW SCHEDULE - FNDN. WIDTH HEIGHT R/O DESCRIPTION 32 " 56 " 33"X57" DOUBLE HUNG 56 " 42 " 57"X43" DBL CASEMENT-LHL

NUMBER LABEL D01 D01-26611 D02 D02-2668 D03 D03-2668 D04 D04-3068 D05 D05-4068 D06 D06-6068 TOTALS:

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

NUMBER LABEL W09 W09-2848DH W13 W13-4836DC TOTALS:

DOOR SCHEDULE - FNDN. FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT R/O DESCRIPTION AREA, ACTUAL (SQ FT) 0 2668 L IN 30 " 80 " 32"X82 1/2" HINGED-DOOR P05 16.67 0 2668 R IN 30 " 80 " 32"X82 1/2" HINGED-DOOR P05 16.67 0 3068 L/R IN 36 " 80 " 38"X82 1/2" DOUBLE HINGED-DOOR P05 20.0 0 6068 L EX 72 " 80 " 74"X83" EXT. SLIDER-GLASS 40.0 183.35

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

QTY 3 2 3 1

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

FOOTING SCHEDULE;

NUMBER LABEL D02 D02-2668 D03 D03-2668 D06 D06-3068 D09 D09-6068 TOTALS:

ELECTRICAL NOTES:

ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES IN BATHROOMS, KITCHENS AND GARAGES SHALL BE G.F.I. OR G.F.I.C. PER ONTARIO ELECTRICAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.
SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER 9.10.19 ELECTRICAL & HVAC LAYOUT IS A SCHEMATIC AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY INSTALLERS & COMPLETED AS PER 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE.

A-1

Page 32 of 174 1 A6

5’-4" 10’-1" 1’-10" 24’ 2’-2"

4’-9" 9’-11" 12’

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

18’

5’-6"

1’-10"

2’-6"

1 A4

1 A5

AS PER OBC CLAUSE 9.15.3.9, THE VERTICAL RISE BETWEEN STEP FOOTING SHALL NOT EXCEED 24" (600mm)

STEP FOUNDATION AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS, TO BE VERIFIED ON SITE

REFER TO FROST PROTECTION DETAIL WHERE GRADE ACHIEVES LESS THAN 1.5 M COVERAGE ON FOOTING.

ALL WALL RE-INFORCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER ICF MANUFACTURERS SPECS.

REFER TO FLOOR MANUF. LAYOUT FOR ALL STAIRWELL FRAMING DETAILS

ALL WALL FOOTINGS 20"x8" DEEP (DESIGNED FOR ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 75 KPa TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE.

5’-6"

3’-8"

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

Basement Layout

SHEET TITLE:

Prelim Finals

3 4

Concept Layout Sketches

DESCRIPTION Concept Layout

NO. 1

DATE

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

3’-3"

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

Pour Height = 8’ - 0"

30’

4’-6"

3’-8"

W09-2848DH

2"x8" JOIST AT 16" O.C.

(1) THE BASEMENT WALL CONTAINING THE DOOR OPENING. (2) AND ANY BASEMENT WALL THAT HAS AN EXPOSED WALL AREA ABOVE THE GROUND LEVEL EXCEEDING 50% OF THE BASEMENT WALL AREA.

12’

4’-3"

1’-10"

D09-6068

2"x8" P.T. LEDGER FASTENED TO RIMBOARD WITH (2) 3/8" DIAMETER CARRIAGE BOLTS AT 32" c/c STAGGERED

4” CONCRETE SLAB c/w 6X6 WWM 2" XPS STYROFOAM 20 MPa COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

5’-10"

D02-2668

3’-4"

2"x8" JOIST AT 16" O.C.

3’-10 1/2" WHERE A DWELLING UNIT HAS A WALKOUT BASEMENT, THE THERMAL PERFORMANCE LEVEL OF THE EXTERIOR BASEMENT WALL SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED FOR THE ABOVE GRADE WALL FOR;

4’-5"

W09-2848DH

9’-1"

W09-2848DH

Laundry Center

CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM MECH. ROOM LAYOUT

18’-5 1/2"

7’-4 3/4"

Pressure Tank

1 A6

4’-10 1/2"

Foundation Layout 1/4" = 1'0"

W09-2848DH

20"W x 8"D FOOTING (TYP) CONFIRM BY SOILS ENG.

17’-5" X 12’-11"

SB3022

10’-4" X 8’-8"

LIVING

Water Softener

Combination Boiler

Drain

HRV

FJP *

Sump Pump

4’

8’-9"

FJP *

9’-0 1/2"

BEDROOM #3

11’-3 1/2"

3’-3 1/2"

5’-4"

D02-2668

FJP *

Sewage Pump

9’-1"

1 A4

10'

1 A2

W13-4836DC

D06-3068 D02-2668

2’-1"

D03-2668

5’-0" X 8’-10"

BATH

36" Corner Shower

Elevation 6

3’-3"

13’-4"

D06-3068

3’-1"

Toilet

7’-10 1/4"

D06-3068

10’-4" X 8’-10"

BEDROOM #2

5’-1"

2’-6" 5’-2 1/2"

1 A5

FJP *

1’-8 1/2"

EXTENT OF 4” PERFORATED WEEPING TILE c/w 6” CLEAR STONE COVER

11’-7"

30'

34'

3’-4 1/2" D03-2668

Basic Stove

2"x10" JOIST AT 16" O.C.

10'

2"x8" JOIST AT 16" O.C.

P.ENG JOIST AS PER MANUF. SPECS

UNSUPPORTED CONCRETE WALL

24'

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-2

Page 33 of 174 10’-10" DCW2436R SB33

W3336

6’-5" 13’-2"

36' 24" Dish

W2136R

W06-2836DH

6’-9"

1’-7"

U332490

W09-2660FX

2’-10" W09-2660FX

2’-10"

12' W09-2660FX

2’-10" 1’-11"

2’-4"

W09-2660FX

D01-26611

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

18'

12" GRACE WATERPROOFING BETWEEN SIDING AND LEDGER

5’-6"

Main Floor Layout

SHEET TITLE:

Concept Layout Sketches

2 3

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION

NO.

JOIST HANGERS

GRADE

5’-6"

EXTERIOR GUARDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER SB-7 OF OBC, OR PROVIDE P.ENG APPROVAL IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

Typ. Deck Framing [Flush Beam]

TYP. ICF FNDN

TYP. P.ENG FLOOR SYSTEM

DECK LEDGER FASTENED TO RIMBOARD AS PER TABLE 9.23.3.4 OBC & (2) 3/8" GALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS AT 32" O.C STAGGERED PROVIDE MINIMUM 1/2" DRAINAGE GAP w/ WASHER

30'

4’-6"

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

DATE

2’-6"

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

TYP. 24"x24"x12" PAD FTG. OR AS NOTED ON FNDN DRWGS

10" SONOTUBE

FINISHED GRADE (MIN. 8" SONOTUBE, ABOVE GRADE)

SIMPSON ADJUSTABLE POST BASE

DECK POST AS PER PLAN

DECK BEAM AS PER PLAN

5/4" DECKING DECK JOIST SIZE / SPACING AS PER PLAN

2" X 6" TOP RAIL 2" X 4" UNDER RAIL 2" X 2" SPINDLES

1’-11"

TYP. DECK DETAIL STRUCTURAL NOTES;

GUARDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER SB-7 OF OBC
GUARDS ARE REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION OF MORE THAN 23-5/8" BETWEEN THE WALKING SURFACE AND THE ADJACENT SURFACE (9.8.8.1).
GUARDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE LOADING CRITERIA IN PART 4 OF THE OBC OR BE CONSTRUCTED AS SET OUT IN THE OBC (9.8.8) AND SUPPLEMENTARY STANDARD SB-7. FOR METAL GUARDS SUPPLIERS SHOP DRAWINGS MUST BE CERTIFIED FOR DESIGN INSTALLATION CONFORMING TO OBC 4.1.5.15 AND 9.8.8.
EXT. GUARDS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 36" WHERE THE WALKING SURFACE SERVED BY THE GUARD IS NOT MORE THAN
5'8" ABOVE THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL.
THE HEIGHT OF GUARDS FOR STEPS SHALL BE MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM A LINE DRAWN THROUGH THE LEADING EDGE OF THE TREADS SERVED BY THE GUARD.
GUARDS SHALL BE DESIGN AS TO PREVENT CLIMBING, WHERE ANY ELEMENTS PROTRUDING FROM THE VERTICAL AND LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA BETWEEN 5-1/2" AND 36"
ABOVE THE FLOOR OR WALKING SURFACE PROTECTED BY THE GUARD.

12'

3’-8"

W08-3060FX

12'

Frame Height = 9’ 1-1/4"

3’-8"

W08-3060FX

36" Open Front [36W]

Main Floor Layout 1/4" = 1'0"

W09-2660FX

W08-3060FX

P11

W09-2660FX

1 A5

2’-10"

P11

DECK 22’-0" X 8’-9"

1 A6

2’-10"

PROVIDE DECKING RAILINGS AS PER SB-7, AT ALL WINDOW SCREENS WITH AN ELEVATION BETWEEN WALKING SURFACE > THEN 600 MM. PROVIDE A MINIMUM GUARD HEIGHT OF 42" WITH AN ELEVATION DIFFERENCE > 1800 MM (70.86")

8 : 12

W09-2660FX

11’-3" X 11’-7"

DECK

4’-0" X 19’-11"

W03-1654FX

PORCH

W07-2854DH

2’-0 1/2"

BUG SCREENING BELOW DECKING

W07-2854DH

D06-6068

3028PT

D06-6068

TALL WALL FRAMED AS PER TABLE A-30 to A-37 OF OBC OR AS PER ILEVEL TALL WALL FRAMING DETAILS

3’-9" DN

W03-1654FX

2’-10"

TYP. DECKING c/w, 1/4" GAP & BUG SCREENING BELOW

D02-2668

16’-7" X 12’-9"

LIVING

P.ENG TRUSSES AS PER MANUF. SPECS

3’-5 1/2"

2’-6"

W02-2440DH

2’-5"

1’-7"

B24R

10’-10" X 12’-7"

Refrig.

EXTENT OF FLOOR ABOVE

5’-1"

D02-2668

3’-6"

11’-6"

LCB36R

KITCHEN

Range Hood

3DB21

W361824

2’-4"

D03-2668

W02-2440DH

2’-4"

8’-4"

12’-6"

REFER TO MANUF. KITCHEN LAYOUT TO CONFIRM WINDOW & CABINET LOCATIONS

BF6

W2136R

30X22 ATTIC ACCESS

W3021

D05-4068

30" Range

2’-1"

Tub-Shower 5 2040PT

7’-8" X 6’-1"

BATH

Standard Toilet

SB2722R

3’-9 1/2"

W01-2040DH

Elevation 6

4’-2 1/2"

2’-1"

W1836R

10’-8" X 9’-9"

W02-2440DH

2’-2"

3’-9" D04-3068

1 A5

W02-2440DH

3’-6"

BEDROOM #1

3’-6"

2’-1"

24'

1 A3

1 A6

W02-2440DH

2’-5"

11’-7"

30'

36'

Min. 5'

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-3

Page 34 of 174 10’-10" 24' 6'

7’-6 1/2"

1’-6"

10’-6"

Typ. Screen Porch Detail 1/4" = 1'0"

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

14'

13’-11" X 9’-11"

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

OPEN BELOW

P.ENG TRUSSES AS PER MANUF. SPECS

17’-8 3/4"

30'

5’-6"

6074MU

1’-6"

Loft Layout

SHEET TITLE:

28911FX

27’-6" X 12’-7"

7’-5 1/2"

2’x4’ SKYLIGHT

Elevation 6

STORAGE

2836DH

14’-11"

P.ENG ATTIC TRUSSES AS PER MANUF. SPECS

2’x4’ SKYLIGHT

7’-5 1/2"

8 : 12 FJP *

Frame Height = 8’ 1-1/4"

Second Floor Layout 1/4" = 1'0"

TYP. DECKING c/w, 1/4" GAP & BUG SCREENING BELOW

13’-2"

1 A4

1 A5

1 A6

7’-6 1/2"

30'

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout Sketches

2 4

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION

5’-6"

FJP *

NO.

8 : 12

DATE

2’-6"

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

2827FX

4’-8 3/4"

7’-6 1/2"

1 A5

1 A6

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

24'

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-4

23829 BCIN

SIGNATURE

Frame Height FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN

DCW2436R W1836R

W2136R 2040PT

KITCHEN D03-2668

D02-2668

BF6

LIVING ROOM

BEDROOM #3

3DB21

Floor Frame

RSI = 0.00

RSI = 1.65 RSI = .06 RSI = 1.65 RSI = .08

Sill Plate

LIVING ROOM

ALL ICF BLOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUF. INSTALLATION SPECS.

9’-5 1/2"

GARAGE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 8" / 10" CONC. FNDN 2-15 M CONTINUOUS REBAR TOP & BOT. 2-15M L BARS TOP & BOT. WALL CORNERS / JUNCTIONS.

BEDROOM #3 BEDROOM #3

RSI = 3.44 (19.54)

8’-1 1/2"

TOTAL RSI

5 D06-3068

GARAGE SLAB CONSTRUCTION

1’-4"

u/s Slab Styro.

D02-2668

DATE:

Top Ftg.

4/17/2017

USF

SCALE:

4" GARAGE SLAB, 32 MPa COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 5%-8% AIR ENTRAINMENT 2" STYROFOAM [OPTIONAL], STONE

D02-2668

BASEMENT SLAB CONSTRUCTION 3" CONCRETE SLAB, min. 20MPa 2" STYROFOAM, STONE

D02-2668

LIVING ROOM DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

ICF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION

LCB36R

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

1’-0 5/8"

SILL ANCHORAGE

SAND BACKFILL MOISTURE BARRIER AS PER MANUF. SPECS ICF FNDN; 2-1/2" EPS 6-1/4" CONCRETE CORE 2-1/2" EPS 1/2" DRYWALL

04-02-2017

W02-2440DH

RSI = 5.06 (28.74)

1/2"x6" ANCHOR BOLTS AT 6'0" O.C. MAX SPACING 2"x6" / 2"x10" P.T. SILL PLATE, c/w SILL GASKET

W361824

W3021

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

RSI = 0.12 RSI = 3.63 RSI = 0.12 RSI = 0.27

SHEET TITLE:

RSI = 0.03 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.89

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

TOTAL RSI VALUE

LIVING ROOM

9’-1 1/4"

3/4" FLOOR SHEETING, GLUE / NAILED P.ENG JOIST, AS PER MANUF. SPECS REFER TO FLOOR MANUF. JOIST LAYOUT EXTERIOR AIR FILM HORIZONTAL SIDING 1"x3" SPRUCE STRAPPING AT 16" O.C. AIR BARRIER 6-1/2" STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS; OSB WALL SHEETING 5-1/2" EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE CORE (EPS) OSB WALL SHEETING RIMBOARD

INT. WALL CONSTRUCTION 1/2" DRYWALL 2"x4" / 2"x6" AT 16" O.C. 1/2" DRYWALL

Prelim Finals

STORAGE

Concept Layout

Sketches

KITCHEN

Concept Layout

RSI = 4.99 (28.38)

STORAGE

DESCRIPTION

TOTAL RSI VALUE

2836DH

RSI = 0.12 RSI = 3.63 RSI = 0.12 RSI = 0.08 RSI = 0.12

NO.

RSI = 0.03 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.89

EXTERIOR AIR FILM HORIZONTAL SIDING 1"x3" SPRUCE STRAPPING AT 16" O.C. AIR BARRIER 6-1/2" STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS; OSB WALL SHEETING 5-1/2" EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE CORE (EPS) OSB WALL SHEETING 1/2" DRYWALL AIR FILM INTERIOR

02-13-2017

SIP WALL CONSTRUCTION

Building Section

DATE

REVIEW ROOF TRUSS DESIGN & VERIFY ALL GIRDER POINT LOADS ARE TRANSFERRED TO FOOTING BELOW

Blake Waugh NAME

LIVING ROOM

RSI = 0.15 RSI = 0.08

EAVE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND 3’ UP FROM THE EDGE OF ROOF, NOT LESS THAN 1’ INSIDE THE INNER FACE OF THE EXT. WALL

Qualification Information

4’-8 3/4"

17’-8 3/4"

01-24-2017

RSI = 10.42 (59.19)

7’-6 1/2"

TOTAL RSI VALUE

30'

RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.03 RSI = 10.16 RSI = 0.00

01-19-2017

METAL ROOF CLADDING 1"x4" STRAPPING AT 16" O.C. SYNTHETIC UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER AS REQ’D OSB ROOF SHEETING OR EQUIV. VENTED ROOF SPACE R60 BLOWN CELLULOSE INSUL. 406.4 mm AT 0.025 RSI /mm P.ENG ROOF TRUSSES AS PER MANUF. SPECS 6 MIL. V.B. CEILING STRAPPING (AIR CAVITY 13-20MM) 1/2" DRYWALL

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

ROOF CONSTRUCTION

Page 35 of 174

FLUSH DECK CONSTRUCTION 5/4" P.T. DECK 2"x8" P.T. AT 16" O.C. c/w HANGERS 2"x8" LEDGER FASTENEED TO RIMBOARD w/ 3-1/2" GALV. LAG SCREWS AT 16" O.C. (c/w BLOCKING) DECK BEAM AS NOTED ON DRWGS' 6"x6" P.T. POST 10" DIA SONOTUBE ON CONC. FTG. AS NOTED ON DRWGS'

1/8" = 1'0" SHEET:

A-5

SIP WALL CONSTRUCTION

INT. WALL CONSTRUCTION

Frame Height

LIVING ROOM

1/2"x6" ANCHOR BOLTS AT 6'0" O.C. MAX SPACING 2"x6" / 2"x10" P.T. SILL PLATE, c/w SILL GASKET

Floor Frame

LIVING ROOM

BEDROOM #3 3/4" PLYWOOD

ICF FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION

9’-1" RSI = 1.65 RSI = .06 RSI = 1.65 RSI = .08

ALL ICF BLOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUF. INSTALLATION SPECS. TOTAL RSI

RSI = 3.44 (19.54)

GARAGE FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 8" / 10" CONC. FNDN 2-15 M CONTINUOUS REBAR TOP & BOT. 2-15M L BARS TOP & BOT. WALL CORNERS / JUNCTIONS.

BASEMENT SLAB CONSTRUCTION

Top Ftg. 3" CONCRETE SLAB, min. 20MPa 2" STYROFOAM, STONE

USF 9

APPROX. 6’-7 7/8" HEIGHT

RSI = 0.00

8’-1 1/2"

SAND BACKFILL MOISTURE BARRIER AS PER MANUF. SPECS ICF FNDN; 2-1/2" EPS 6-1/4" CONCRETE CORE 2-1/2" EPS 1/2" DRYWALL

3/4" PLYWOOD

Sill Plate

BEDROOM #2

Prelim Finals 4

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

STAIRWELL

BEDROOM #1

SHEET TITLE:

9’-1 1/4"

3/4" PLYWOOD

D03-2668

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

RSI = 5.06 (28.74)

SILL ANCHORAGE

KITCHEN

W07-2854DH

BEDROOM

BEDROOM #2

W09-2848DH

D02-2668

D03-2668

D06-3068

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

RSI = 0.12 RSI = 3.63 RSI = 0.12 RSI = 0.27

10’-1 7/8"

3/4" PLYWOOD

RSI = 0.03 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.89

1’-0 5/8"

TOTAL RSI VALUE

23829 BCIN

BATH

FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 3/4" FLOOR SHEETING, GLUE / NAILED P.ENG JOIST, AS PER MANUF. SPECS REFER TO FLOOR MANUF. JOIST LAYOUT EXTERIOR AIR FILM HORIZONTAL SIDING 1"x3" SPRUCE STRAPPING AT 16" O.C. AIR BARRIER 3/4" PLYWOOD 6-1/2" STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS; OSB WALL SHEETING 5-1/2" EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE CORE (EPS) OSB WALL SHEETING RIMBOARD

SIGNATURE

2827FX

1/2" DRYWALL 2"x4" / 2"x6" AT 16" O.C. 1/2" DRYWALL

Building Section

STORAGE

Qualification Information

Concept Layout

Sketches

BEDROOM #1

6074MU

STAIRWELL

28911FX RSI = 0.12 RSI = 3.63 RSI = 0.12 RSI = 0.08 RSI = 0.12

Concept Layout

RSI = 4.99 (28.38)

BEDROOM #

STAIRWELL

DESCRIPTION

TOTAL RSI VALUE

STORAGE

NO.

RSI = 0.03 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.89

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

04-02-2017

REVIEW ROOF TRUSS DESIGN & VERIFY ALL GIRDER POINT LOADS ARE TRANSFERRED TO FOOTING BELOW

DATE

EAVE PROTECTION SHALL EXTEND 3’ UP FROM THE EDGE OF ROOF, NOT LESS THAN 1’ INSIDE THE INNER FACE OF THE EXT. WALL

Blake Waugh NAME

RSI = 0.15 RSI = 0.08

02-13-2017

RSI = 10.42 (59.19)

BATH

01-24-2017

TOTAL RSI VALUE

30'

RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.00 RSI = 0.03 RSI = 10.16 RSI = 0.00

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

01-19-2017

BATH

ROOF CONSTRUCTION

GARAGE SLAB CONSTRUCTION

DATE: 4" GARAGE SLAB, 32 MPa COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 5%-8% AIR ENTRAINMENT 2" STYROFOAM [OPTIONAL], STONE

Page 36 of 174

HEADROOM OVER STAIRS MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM A LINE DRAWN THROUGH THE LEADING EDGE OF TREADS, SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 1950 mm (6’ 5")

4/17/2017 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0" SHEET:

HEADROOM OVER STAIRS MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM A LINE DRAWN THROUGH

A-6

2’-8"

u/s Slab Styro.

FNDN. PARGING TO GRADE

Page 37 of 174

1 A7 6’-9 1/2"

9’-5 1/2"

1’-0 5/8"

Floor Frame

Sill Plate

Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'0" VERTICAL SIDING

Frame Height 2827FX

VERTICAL SIDING

OS CORNER

W07-2854DH

W08-3060FX W08-3060FX

W09-2848DH W08-3060FX

W09-2848DH

PROPOSED GRADE W07-2854DH

PVC WINDOW

D06-6068

W09-2848DH

PVC PATIO DOOR

Elevations

WALL FLASHING

USF DATE:

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout Sketches

2 4

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION

6074MU NO.

28911FX

ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT

SHEET TITLE:

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

DATE

ALUM. FASCIA

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

9’-1 1/4"

METAL ROOFING

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

Top Ftg. DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

10'

FRIEZE BOARD

SEAMLESS ALUM. EAVESTROUGH, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TO BIG-O BELOW

W09-2848DH

D09-6068

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-7

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

Page 38 of 174

1 A8 VERTICAL SIDING

Top Ftg.

USF

Rear Elevation 1/4" = 1'0" W02-2440DH W01-2040DH W02-2440DH W02-2440DH W02-2440DH

OS CORNER

PVC WINDOW

Floor Frame

Sill Plate

FNDN. PARGING TO GRADE

TYP. ICF FNDN.

TYP. CONC. FTG.

Elevations

Frame Height

SHEET TITLE:

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout Sketches

2 4

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION 1

NO.

VERTICAL CLADDING

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

W02-2440DH BW

ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

9’-1 1/4"

2836DH

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

1’-0 5/8"

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

DATE

ALUM. FASCIA

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

8’-1 1/2"

METAL ROOFING

FRIEZE BOARD

SEAMLESS ALUM. EAVESTROUGH, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TO BIG-O BELOW

PROPOSED GRADE

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-8

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

Page 39 of 174

1 A9 W09-2660FX

USF

Right Elevation 1/4" = 1'0" W09-2660FX W09-2660FX D01-26611

Top Ftg.

PROPOSED GRADE W03-1654FX

OS CORNER

D04-3068

EXT. STEEL DOOR

Floor Frame

Sill Plate

FNDN. PARGING TO GRADE

TYP. ICF FNDN.

TYP. CONC. FTG.

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

W03-1654FX

ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT

FRIEZE BOARD

HORIZONTAL SIDING

Elevations

SHEET TITLE:

Frame Height

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

9’-1 1/4"

Concept Layout Sketches

2 3

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION

NO. 1

SEAMLESS ALUM. EAVESTROUGH, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TO BIG-O BELOW

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

MIN. 3’-6"

1’-0 5/8"

STEEL ROOFING

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

8’-1 1/2"

DATE

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

24"x48" SKYLIGHT

ALUM. FASCIA

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-9

8" 8’-1 1/2"

Page 40 of 174

1 A10 Top Ftg.

USF

Left Elevation 1/4" = 1'0" W09-2660FX W09-2660FX W09-2660FX W09-2660FX

SCREEN WINDOWS

Floor Frame

Sill Plate

FNDN. PARGING TO GRADE

TYP. CONC. FTG.

ALUM. VENTED SOFFIT

FRIEZE BOARD

HORIZONTAL SIDING

TYP. ICF FNDN.

Elevations

SHEET TITLE:

OS CORNER

W13-4836DC

2017 Cove, Kevin 305 Island Drive Bob’s Lake

W06-2836DH

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Frame Height

CCH Designs Inc. Smiths Falls, ON Office - 613-284-8324 Mobile - 613-229-1740

9’-1 1/4"

Concept Layout Sketches

2 3

Prelim Finals

Concept Layout

DESCRIPTION

NO. 1

SEAMLESS ALUM. EAVESTROUGH, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE TO BIG-O BELOW

DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:

MIN. 3’-6"

1’-0 5/8"

STEEL ROOFING

ALUM. FASCIA

DATE:

4/17/2017 SCALE:

1/8" = 1'0"

SHEET:

A-10

DATE

04-02-2017

02-13-2017

01-24-2017

01-19-2017

Blake Waugh NAME

SIGNATURE

Qualification Information

23829 BCIN

The undersigned has reviewed and takes responsibility for this design, and has the qualifications and meets the requirements set out in the Ontario Building Code.

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-14-17-B Sally Muzik Concession 2, Lot/Part Lot 21, 25 Morton Point Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section 10.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from HWM Date of Hearing: April 13, 2017

BACKGROUND This application was originally brought to the Committee in April, 2017 but was deferred to allow an opportunity for the applicant to confirm and stake out the proposed building location and allow an opportunity for Committee members to conduct a site visit. The applicant has confirmed the proposed setback from the HWM at 30 feet and has indicated they are willing to survey locate the new foundation if required. The subject land consists of 1.24 +/- acres with frontage on Bob’s Lake and Morton Point Lane. The lot is currently developed with a 760 square foot footprint dwelling with an attached 400 square foot deck located approximately 6 feet from the high water mark of Bobs Lake, plus a 200 square foot detached garage located 7 feet from the HWM and a 120 square foot shed located 10 feet from the HWM of Bob’s Lake. The proposal is for the demolition of all existing structures and the construction of a 960 square foot dwelling to be located a minimum of 30 feet from the HWM of Bob’s Lake. This proposed structure will be raised to accommodate a crawlspace for utilities and new foundation. A new septic system is proposed to be located on the south side of Morton Point Lane in order to minimize impact on the lake. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor?

Page 41 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Current Zoning: Limited Service Waterfront Residential (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority have no objection the application as submitted. They have recommended several best management practices to be incorporated into the site plan agreement, including re-establishment of the waterfront vegetative buffer in front of the new structure except for a pedestrian access path to the dock/water. KFL&A Public Health has no objections. Comments were not required from roads. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 960 square foot footprint, single story, dwelling with a crawlspace underneath, no living space permitted, to be constructed a minimum of 30 feet from the high water mark of Bob’s Lake.
Minor variance MV-14-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Muzik Property RVCA comments

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 42 of 174

Fish Creek

O M

O RT

T IN

N LA

MUZIK MV-14-17-B

Legend Muzik Property Muzik Proposed Cottage Existing Buildings

Proposed Cottage

Page 43 of 174

Scale 1:614 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

24 Meters

Page 44 of 174

.9. KFL&A

Public Health REQUESTSFOR COMMENTS

Environmental Health Department 1130 Elizabeth Street Sharbot Lake, Ontario KOH2P0 (613)279-2151

1-800-267-7875 Fax: (613) 279-3997

http://www.kflapublichea|th.ca

To:

Mr. Lindsay Mills Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac PO 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON 2T0

Application Number:

MV-14—17B

Type of Application or Proposal:

Minor Variance

Applicant Name(s):

Muzik, Sally

Location:

Planning Department or Agency:

Comments:

mspectorz

Date:

Part Lot 21, Concession 2, Bedford District 25 Morton Point Lane

Township of South Frontenac (Bedford)

KFL&APublic Health has no objections to the proposed minor variance as the owner has submitted an application under permit number BE-1-17.

Public?ealth Inspect April 10, 2017

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected underthe authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613)549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 45 of 174

RIDEAUVALLEY

3889 RideauValley Drive,R0. Box 599, Manotick,ON Kw 1A5 tel 613-692-3571 | 1-ECO-267-3504| fax 613692-0831 I www.rvca.ca

April 5, 2017

17-SFR-MV-Bed Township of South Frontenac Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Attention: Lindsay Mills

Subject:

Muzik Minor Variance Application MV-14-17-B in Part Lot 21 Concession 2, South Frontenac-Bedford Ward- 25 Mortons Point Lane (Bob’s Lake- Green Bay)

Dear Mr. Mills: Further to our site visit, the RVCA offers the following comments for redevelopment of this lot as it relates to:

Section 2.1 Natural Heritage (wetlands) and 3.1 Natural Hazards (?ood and erosion hazards) of the Provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of the Planning Act. Waterfront setbacks and best management practices and “Site Evaluation Guidelines” derived from the “Rideau Lakes Study”(1993); the Rideau Lakes Study considers the effects of development on phosphorous loading and the protection of recreational water quality on waterbodies within the Upper Rideau watershed. The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority regulations under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, Tay Subwatershed Report- Bobs Lake catchment summary.

Our review for development/redevelopment looks to address waterfront disturbance and development setbacks to preclude/limit nutrient (phosphorus) and sediment input to our lakes in order to protect recreational water quality. Maintaining existing setbacks and/or advocating for increased water setbacks based on site conditions, lake sensitivity and planning standards set out in the Zoning By Law and Official Plan of the Township are key considerations in this regard.

The Proposal The application proposes to demolish the existing 71 square metre cottage, the 18.4 square metre garage and 11 square metre shed and the cottage’s attached deck, all within 30 metres of the high water mark of Bobs Lake and replace with a one-storey 89 square metre cottage, with crawlspace at

Page 1 of 3

Page 46 of 174

a greater setback from the lake (approximate 5 metre water setback increase). intent to reconstruct a deck at the front of the proposed cottage.

The plan shows no

A new septic system is to be installed on the cleared level area to the rear of the right-of-way, greater than 30 metres from the water. The current parking area is also to remain in this area of the lot, to the rear of the right-of—way.

The Property and Site Conditions

Roughly the front half of the site is low lying. Grades are very limited at and around the cottage site, rising slightly from the shoreline to the right-of—way. Our mapping (attached) indicates that the 1:100 year flood hazard (163.07 geodetic) extends upland over the portion of the lot currently occupied by the deck at the front of the existing cottage.

The site has been cleared of forest from the water to the rear half of the lot, at which point the topography jumps 4-5 metres to higher ground and where native forest cover has been left undisturbed.

Soil cover is limited and drainage restricted due to the low lying nature of the front portion of the lot. Progressing to the south, drainage improves as grades increase away from the lake. There are no provincially significant wetlands in the immediate vicinity which would impede the redevelopment of this lot. From a more general perspective, our recent Tay Subwatershed Report and Bob’s Lake Catchment Reporfindicates that West Basin may be characterized as a lake with clear waters and moderate nutrient levels. The lake generally has good aesthetics for recreational use. While the lake is generally considered to be healthy, there is a potential for it to be impacted by increased nutrient loading which may result in increased aquatic vegetation and algal blooms, particularly as the season progresses (see our website wvvw.rvca.cafor the full report). Discussion and Recommendations The proposed redevelopment as we understand it, will increase the total square footage of the cottage by approximately 20%. The re-orientation of the proposed cottage as may be possible given the encroaching right-of-way, will provide for an increased setback from water. The removal of the existing deck, shed and garage will reduce the structural development and “hardened surface” area occupying the waterfront of the lake and provide for more opportunity to control, slow and in?ltrate roof runoff from the new structure, thereby potentially limiting nutrient and sediment load from reaching the lake. The new structure is to be raised to accommodate a crawlspace under the cottage, we recommend that the elevation of the underside of the cottage be at least 163.37 metres geodetic (163.07 +0.3 metres) such that there is no ?ood hazard concern for the new structure; Bob’s Lake is not yet under regulation and no permit is required under our Ontario Regulation 174-06 but we strongly recommend that regard be had to set the cottage main floor safely above ?ood hazard.

The new septic system, particularly if it provides for Level 4 treatment and has regard for the high ground water conditions and ?ood hazard, will reduce potential for phosphorous, nitrogen and pathogen input to the lake. Page 2 of3

Page 47 of 174

Given the scale of redevelopment and considering the removal of garage, shed and decking within the water setback area, the RVCA has no objection to the project as proposed, with the following best management practices included in the site approval; Surface and roof runoff management shall be implemented by directing runoff from eaves trough placement and outlets to the rear of the site (and away from well and septic) to provide maximum in?ltration of roof runoff. In?ltration pits along with rain barrels should be incorporated in the site plan. Site runofflsediment controls be placed on the “water” side of construction as may be necessary (straw bales andlor sediment fencing) to the satisfaction of the Building Of?cial prior to commencement of work and remain in place and in good working order until the site is stable (soil and vegetation cover is restored). Confirmation that no grade changes will result as part of the site re-development.

Re~establishment of the waterfront vegetative buffer except for the pedestrian access path to the docklwater (we have forwarded a Shoreline Naturalization brochure to the owner to potentially assist with additional site plantings). This will assist in controlling the drift of sediment and nutrient, particularly phosphorous, to the lake. An extensive and stable vegetation buffer will aid in protecting the lakes water quality and habitat in the long term. We offer our Shoreline Renaturaization Program (1 800 267 3504 x 1192 for shoreline planting assistance). The RVCA supports the installation of a tertiary treatment system situated to respect the municipal water setback. Please note that the shoreline of Bob’s Lake is subject to Ontario Regulation 174/06 Development, Interference with Wetlands, Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation made pursuant to the Conservation Authorities Act. Any newlproposed shoreline work requires a permit from the RVCA. Please advise us on the Committees decision or any changes in the status of the application. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please don’t hesitate to contact the undersigned should you have any questions. Yours truly, Q

e’_Je,€‘t‘

63:42Martha Bradburn RVCA Environmental Planner 613 267 5353 X131 cc- bowescarp@hotmai|.com sa||ymuzik@gmai|.com KFLA DHU (J. McGurn) —

Page 3 of3

Page 48 of 174

Legend

25 Morton Point Lane, Bedford

Applicable Law Addresses Parcel - Assesment Lot Area of Reduced Flood Risk RVCA Admin Boundary Regulation Limit 100yr Floodline Reg Limit Dominant Hazard Floodplain Geo-technical Hazard Limit Meander Belt Stable Slope Top of Slope Unstable Slope Wetland

Provincially Significant Wetland + 120m 100yr Floodline + 15m Top of Slope + 15m Unstable Slope + 15m Stable Slope + 15m Regulated Wetlands Municipal Drains OHN Watercourse RVCA Sub-Watersheds Ottawa Parcels Former Municipalities Spot Height DRAPE 2014 50cm 1m 50 cm

Wetlands Notes

1,128

57.3

Page 49 of 174

40.5

Evaluated-Provincial (PSW) Parcel data is owned by Teranet Enterprises Inc and its suppliers. All non-PSW Wetlands rights reserved. May not be reproduced without permission. Waterbody

1: 798 0

20.27

40.5 Meters Map created: 3/23/2017

WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary _Sphere

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 4, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-08-17-L Estate of John Francis Koen Concession 6, Lot/Part Lot 25, Koen Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 4.3 +/- acres with frontage on Koen Road and Loughborough Lake. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of a new 0.2 +/- acre lot addition, with 60 feet of frontage on Koen Road and 60 feet of water frontage, to be added to 316 Koen Road (ARN 102904003013400). The property to be enlarged is currently 0.25+/- acres in size and is developed with a seasonal dwelling. The planning department is able to support the application for the lot addition as the proposal increases the size of a significantly undersized waterfront lot. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections to the application, but note that written permission must be obtained prior to any development taking place on the property. The building department has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].

Page 50 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-08-17-L shall be for the creation of a 0.2 +/acre lot addition only to 316 Koen Road (ARN 102904003013400). 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.) 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 6. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Koen Property CRCA Comments Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 51 of 174

Page 52 of 174

Page 53 of 174

Please inform this of?ce of any decision made by the Committee with regard to this application. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 244, or by e-mail at aschmidt@crca.ca

4,,,,/t…»-»¢ £4 Andrew Schmidt, C. Tech. Development Review Manager /as c.c.

Clayton and Margaret Potts, 1362 “Waterside Way, Kingston, ON, K7 K OG2

Page 3 of 3

Page 54 of 174

KO EN

LA N

KOEN S-08-17-L KOEN

RO AD

Legend

Lot to be Enlarged

Retained Parcel

Koen Property Potts Lot Addition Potts Property Existing Buildings

Proposed Lot Addition

Loughborough Lake Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 55 of 174

Subject Property

Scale 1:614 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

24 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-09-17-S George Desrochers Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 13, Ramparts Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 215.5 +/- acres with frontage on Ramparts Road and Battersea Road. The lot is developed with two small agricultural buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a 10+/acre lot addition to be added to 5002 Ramparts Road (ARN 102906006015200). The property to be enlarged is currently 25+/- acres in size and is developed with a single detached dwelling and two accessory buildings. The planning department is able to support the application for the lot addition. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-09-17-L shall be for the creation of a 10 +/acre lot addition only to 5002 Ramparts Road (ARN 102906006015200).

Page 56 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.) 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 6. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Desrochers Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 57 of 174

RAMPARTS ROAD

NE RAMPARTS LA

DESROCHERS S-09-17-S

Legend Desrochers Lot Addition Desrochers Property Existing Buildings

Proposed Lot Addition

Retained Parcel Lot to be Enlarged 5002 Ramparts Road

Page 58 of 174

Scale 1:6,000 0

120

180

UTM Projection NAD 83

240 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-11-17-S George Desrochers Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 13, Ramparts Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 215.5 +/- acres with frontage on Ramparts Road and Battersea Road. The lot is developed with two small agricultural buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a 140+/acre lot addition to be added to a vacant parcel (ARN 102906006015223). The property to be enlarged is currently 0.4 +/- acres in size and is land locked. The planning department is able to support the application for the lot addition. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-11-17-L shall be for the creation of a 140 +/acre lot addition only to a vacant parcel (ARN 102906006015223).

Page 59 of 174

ATTACHMENTS Map of Desrochers Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 60 of 174

5227 Ramparts Rd.

BATTERSEA ROAD

RAMPARTS LA

Retained Parcel

DESROCHERS S-11-17-S

Legend Application S-09-17-S

Desrochers Property

5002 R am parts Rd.

S-11-17-S Lot Addition S-09-17-S Lot Addition

Lot to be Enlarged

4981 Ramparts Rd.

S LL HI

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Page 61 of 174

RAMPARTS ROAD

While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Scale 1:8,827

5595 Battersea Rd.

5656 Battersea Rd.

160

240

320 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-10-17-S Mark & Julie Richards Concession 4, Lot/Part Lot 18, Greenfield Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 2.67 +/- acres with frontage on Greenfield Road. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of a 0.02+/- acre lot addition with 5 feet of frontage on Greenfield Road to be added to 3920 Greenfield Road (ARN 102906002014750). This lot addition is to rectify the issue of the septic pipes and other buried service lines for 3920 Greenfield Road being located on the abutting property. The property to be enlarged is currently 6.5+/- acres in size and is developed with a single detached dwelling and a detached accessory building. The planning department is able to support the application for the lot addition. Current Zoning: Residential Waterfront – Special Zone 26/27 (RW-26, RW-27) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-10-17-L shall be for the creation of a 0.02 +/acre lot addition only to 3920 Greenfield Road (ARN 102906002014750).

Page 62 of 174

ATTACHMENTS Map of Richards Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 63 of 174

µ RICHARDS S-10-17-S

Loughborough Lake

Proposed Lot Addition

3920 Greenfield Road

Legend Richards Lot Addition Richards Property

Lot to be Enlarged

GREE N

FIELD LA

Retained Parcel

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

D IELD ROA GREENF

Page 64 of 174

3901 Greenfield Road

Scale 1:1,918 0 5 10

3919 Greenfield Road

40 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-12-17-S David Cliff Concession 1, Lot/Part Lot 18/19, Holmes Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 86.5 +/- acres with frontage on Holmes Road. The lot is developed with a single detached dwelling and multiple agricultural outbuildings. The proposal is for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage along Holmes Road. A Minimum Distance Separation calculation has been done and the proposed lot is outside the area of influence. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Public Works department has no objections. KFL&A Public Health has no objections and states that the lot is flexible for the siting of a septic system. The building department has no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].

Page 65 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-12-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage along Holmes Road. 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.) 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the new parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 6. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Cliff Property KFL&A Comments Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 66 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-13-17-S David Cliff Concession 1, Lot/Part Lot 18/19, Holmes Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 86.5 +/- acres with frontage on Holmes Road. The lot is developed with a single detached dwelling and multiple agricultural outbuildings. The proposal is for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage along Holmes Road. A Minimum Distance Separation calculation has been done and the proposed lot is outside the area of influence. This lot, should it be approved, will be the third and final severance permitted from 4276 Holmes Road. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].

Page 67 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-13-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage along Holmes Road. 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.) 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the new parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 6. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Cliff Property KFL&A Comments Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 68 of 174

NE OINT LA

BUCK P

4101 Holmes Road

CLIFF S-12-17-S S-13-17-S

Legend Cliff Property S-13-17-S Proposed Lot

4137 Holmes Road

S-12-17-S Proposed Lot

HOLMES ROAD

Retained Parcel

4184 Holmes Road

Page 69 of 174

Scale 1:4,255 0

120

160 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Page 70 of 174

Page 71 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-14-17-L Don & Claudette Quintal Concession 6, Lot/Part Lot 11, Hogan Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.5 +/- acres with approximately 700 feet of frontage on Sydenham Lake. The lot is developed with a single detached dwelling and a detached accessory building (1971 Hogan Road). The proposal is for the creation of a 0.3+/- acre lot addition to a 1.2 +/- acre vacant parcel (ARN 102905004061215). This lot addition will have the effect of creating a new waterfront lot, as the lot being enlarged currently does not have any frontage on Sydenham Lake. The vacant lot does have an existing deeded right-of-way over 1971 Hogan Road, to access Sydenham Lake and this right-of-way is encompassed within the lot addition parcel; the lot addition parcel is also separated from the rest of the lot by a significant difference in elevation. These factors combined have the effect of making the lot addition parcel unusable to 1971 Hogan Road. While there is sufficient waterfrontage to allow both lots to have the required minimum of 91m both the severed and retained parcels will need to be rezoned to a special Waterfront Residential zone to reflect the reduced lot sizes, 1.5 +/- acres (vacant) and 1.2 +/- acres (1971 Hogan Road). The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has evaluated the proposal and have no objections based on consideration for natural hazards, natural heritage and water quality. They have indicated that a permit may be required for any proposed development on the lot as it lies within 120 metres of a provincially significant wetland. The building department has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required.

Page 72 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-14-17-L shall be for the creation of a 0.3 +/acre lot addition only, with a minimum of 91m of frontage along Sydenham Lake, to a vacant parcel (ARN 102905004061215).
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.)
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

Page 73 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement to be registered on title to the severed and retained parcels which deals with the Township’s environmental policies, as well as the requirement for the owner to contact Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority prior to any development on the property, to determine the need for a permit. 8. The applicant shall rezone the lots (severed and retained parcels) to be created from Consent Application S-14-17-L from Rural to a Special Residential Waterfront Zone in order to recognise the undersized lots. Please contact Lindsay Mills, the Township Planner, to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Quintal Property CRCA Comments Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 74 of 174

Page 75 of 174

Page 76 of 174

1996 Hogan Road

QUINTAL S-14-17-L

HOGAN ROAD

Legend Lot to be Enlarged

Retained Parcel

Sydenham Lake

Quintal Property

1971 Hogan Road

Quintal Lot Addiiton

Page 77 of 174

Scale 1:921 0

4.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

36 Meters

Page 78 of 174

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (S-15—17—L) May 3, 2017

Based upon a review of CRCA mapping, the only suitable development envelope on the lot to be severed outside of the 120 metre adjacent lands to the wetland appears to be in roughly the centre of the property. However, there does not appear to be access to this portion of the property without putting a road / laneway through the 120 metre adjacent lands to the wetland. In accordance with the Provincial Policy Statement, Section 5.2.5 of the Township Of?cial Plan indicates that no new development or site alteration will be permitted within 120 metres of a provincially signi?cant wetland unless it has been demonstrated through an Enviromnental Impact Assessment (EIA) that there will be no negative impacts on the wetland or on its ecological functions. Sta?’recommend that the applicant be requested to complete an EIA in support ofthe application that recommends an appropriate location for access to the portion ofthe property that can be considered for development. The EIA must demonstrate that there will be no negative impacts to the wetland feature. Recommendation Staff recommend deferral of application S-15-17-L until the applicant has provided an EIA in support of the application.

Upon completion of the EIA, it can be circulated to the CRCA for review and consideration. The applicant should be informed that the CRCA charges a review fee of $695 to provide peer review services for an EIA. Ontario Regulation 148/06 We note that lands within 120 metres of the wetland boundary are subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by the CRCA. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e. g. development and site alteration) to a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as ?ooding and erosion, and to ensure that the hydrologic function of the wetland is preserved. Within a regulatedarea, written permission must be obtained from the CRCA prior to development taking place. Present and future landowners are required to contact the CRCA to determine the need for a permit.

Andrew Schmidt, C.Tech Development Review Manager /as c.c.

Estate of John Francis Koen, 115 3010 Riverbend Drive, Coquitlam, BC, V3C 0B8 Lindsay Mills, Planner (via email) —

Page 2 of 2

Page 79 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-15-17-L Estate of John Francis Koen Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 24/25, Northshore Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 150 +/- acres with frontage on Northshore Road and Leland Road. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of a 50 +/- acre lot, identified as Part 3 on reference plan 13R18071 with frontage on Northshore Road and Leland Road. This part was originally a separate parcel but has merged with the southern 100 +/- acres (identified as Part 1 on reference plan 13R18071) through common ownership. The two parcels are joined along a 30 foot long fence line and the proposal is to divide them along this existing line. The applicant has indicated the intention of selling to 50 +/- acre parcel to the Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) as a significant portion of the lot is designated as provincially significant wetland and unsuitable for development. The applicant will be required to rezone the parcel created from Rural to Open Space – Private in order to limit the possibility of future development. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has evaluated the proposal and has recommended deferral of the application until the applicant has completed an Environmental Impact Assessment which recommends an appropriate location to access the portion of the property that could be considered for development which demonstrates no negative effects. Once completed the CRCA has requested to be circulated with the EIA so they can complete a peer review of the evaluation. Note: The CRCA has been advised of the intention to sell the severed parcel to the NCC and the required rezoning to OS-P; they have indicated they would be favourable to this. The building department has no objections.

Page 80 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required as there is no new entrance or septic system proposed.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-15-17-L shall be for the creation of a 50 +/acre lot with frontage on Northshore Road and Leland Road.
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.)
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good Page 81 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement to be registered on title to the severed and retained parcels which deals with the Township’s environmental policies, as well as the requirement for the owner to contact Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority prior to any development on the property, to determine the need for a permit. 8. The applicant shall rezone the lots (severed and retained parcels) to be created from Consent Application S-14-17-L from Rural to a Special Residential Waterfront Zone in order to recognise the undersized lots. Please contact Lindsay Mills, the Township Planner, to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Quintal Property CRCA Comments Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 82 of 174

Pond Hole Lake

ROA

O AD

ND LELA

SHO R

Pond Hole Lake

NOR

KOEN S-15-17-L

Legend Koen Property Koen Proposed Lot

Retained Parcel Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

LAN LE

LA N KO EN

LA EMERALD

B PEB

Page 83 of 174

KOEN ROAD

Loughborough Lake

Scale 1:9,120 0

180

270

UTM Projection NAD 83

360 Meters

µ VERYZER S-16-17-L

4836 Rosedale

4831 Rosedale

Legend Veryzer Property Existing Buildings Veryzer Proposed Lot

Retained Parcel

ROSEDALE ROAD

4797 Rosedale

Page 84 of 174

Scale 1:3,097 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

120 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-16-17-L Krista Veryzer, Paul Rapin Concession 6, Lot/Part Lot 4, Rosedale Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 38.4 +/- acres with frontage on Rosedale Road. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential with a minimum of 76m of frontage along Rosedale Road. This new lot will encompass the existing structure. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health, Public Works were not required as there is no new entrance or septic system proposed.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-16-17-L shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Rosedale Road.

Page 85 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.) 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 6. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Veryzer Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 86 of 174

Jennie Kapusta From: Sent: To: Subject:

Pixley, Ashley pixleya@limestone.on.ca May-04-17 8:32 PM Jennie Kapusta Application # S-16-17-S Veryzer and Rapin

To whom it may concern, My name is Ashley Pixley and I reside at 2751 Freeman Road in Sydenham with my husband, Doug and our two daughters. I and my husband, are writing to express our comments and concerns regarding the creation of a new lot at 4831 Rosedale, Sydenham, as per application # S-16-17-S from applicants K. Veryzer and P. Rapin. First, let me express that we are pleased to see renovations and yard maintenance taking place at the residence on the current 4831 Rosedale lot. It has sat vacant for quite some time, and not seeing it become irreparable or as some would say “an eye-sore” is good news for the families and property owners that live nearby. We all take pride in our homes and lots and my family enjoys the rural atmosphere and view our property has to offer. The only house we can see from our backyard is 4831 Rosedale, and because of the bareness of the view this is one of the reasons why we purchased this house just over five years ago. We enjoy seeing the open field, trees and wildlife, such as turkey, deer, coyote, fox, rabbit and a multitude of birds. My concerns do not lie with creating a Lot surrounding 4831 Rosedale, but I do have concerns as to the usage of the retained parcel, specifically the 10 +/- acres that are in direct contact with our southern property line. We speculate that there would be additional residence(s) built on the retained parcel, as there would be no reason otherwise that comes to mind, to create a lot surrounding 4831 Rosedale. This is of concern not only for the wildlife that I mentioned inhabits the property, but loss of current water supply and quality on existing nearby properties including ours with the addition of wells which are not currently on the retained parcel, losing the rural view, land crowding and potential loss of the tree line which is detrimental to wildlife but also acts as natural protection from wind and soil erosion. For these reasons, we do not support the creation of a lot at 4831 Rosedale. We wish to be notified of any decisions makes in respect of the application and hearings in the case of an appeal. Thank you, Ashley and Doug Pixley 2751 Freeman Road Sydenham 613-328-6236 pixleya@limestone.on.ca

Ashley Pixley Music Education Specialist Rideau Public School

Page 87 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-17-17-S, S-18-17-S K. Mulrooney Trucking Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 37/38, Frontenac Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create two (2) new lots Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 73.3 +/- acres with frontage on Frontenac Road and Battersea Road. The lot is currently vacant but partially zoned Rural Industrial which permits a variety of uses. The proposal is for the creation two (2) new residential lots each a minimum of 2 acres in size, with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Frontenac Road. Both proposed lots are outside the 500m area of influence for the nearby mineral aggregate designated lands. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lots. Current Zoning: Rural (RU)/Rural Industrial (RI) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Public works has no objections. KFL&A has no objections and has indicated both proposed lots are flexible in terms of siting a septic system.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-17-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Frontenac Road. Page 88 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

The land to be severed by Consent Application S-18-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Frontenac Road.
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.)
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Mulrooney Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta Page 89 of 174

MCGARVEY ROAD

MULROONEY S-17-17-S S-18-17-S

Legend Mulrooney Property Mulrooney Proposed Lots

RO EA BA TT ER S

FRONTENAC ROAD

Retained Parcel

S-17-17-S (Lot 1)

S-18-17-S (Lot 2)

Page 90 of 174

Scale 1:3,000 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

120 Meters

Hea1th¢’¢ http://www.kf|apublichealth.ca

NSENTTO SEVE R

Environmental Health Department Receipt Number: SK—18-2017

File Number:

S-17-17-S Owner(s): K. Mulrooney Trucking Ltd. Municipality:

Ward / Former Township:

Township of South Frontenac

Storrington

Lot:

5 Pt 37, W Pt 38

Concession: 7

Plan of Subdivision:

Part(s):

Registered Plan:

13R10403

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and

Severed:

Subiot:

sewage, etc)

Mixed woods with transmission lines running through the southeast corner. Bordered by the proposed retained lot to the north and east, another proposed severed lot to the south, and Frontenac Road to the west.

Retained:

on the north end and a parking area in the centre. Lot is mostly treed, other than where the transmission lines run through. Proposed retained lot is bordered by Battersea Road to the north, a neighbouring lotto the east, Mount Chesney Road and neighbouring lots to the south, and Frontenac Road to the west. Large lot with an existing structure

Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water table with bar. Show estimated permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable. Severed

Topsoil

Clav Limestone

Depth of Soil —~——>

o_o m

–>

0.3 m 0.6 m 09m 1.2 m 1.5 m

__________>

Retained

Percolation rate (estimated):

NOTE: the approval of any new lot is based on its suitability to provide an area for a Class 4 septic tank system for an average 3 bedroom home. Approval to build a larger home on this lot will be subject to availability of sufficient area for a larger septic tank system.

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED V

Conditions:

Satisfactory

The proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system. The soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system.

Unsatisfactory

The location of the sewage disposal system and speci?c requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development.

Site Flexible

Site Specific

RETAINED

Conditions:

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory Site Flexible x

Site Specific

Inspector: Matthew Doyle CPHl(C),Public Health Inspector

Approved:

/W’

Date:

Mav04. 2017

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Bullding Code Act, and will be used for the adminlstratlon of Public Healt programs. Any questlons about the collection of this information should be dlrected to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic h Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 91 of 174

Healtho %

http:/ www.kf|apublichealth.ca

NSENT TO SEVER

Environmental Health Department

Receipt Number: SK-19-2017

File Number: S-13-17-5 Owner(s): K. Mulrooney Trucking Ltd. Municipality:

Ward / Former Township:

Township of South Frontenac

Storrinston

Lot:

5 Pt 37, W Pt 38

Concession: 7

Registered Plan:

Plan of Subdivision:

Part(s):

13R10403

Sublot:

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and sewage, etc)

Severed:

Mixed woods with transmission lines running through the centre of the lot. Bordered by another proposed severed lot to the north, the proposed retained lot to the east, neighbouring lots to the south, and Frontenac Road to the west.

Retained:

Large lot with an existing structure on the north end and a parking area in the centre. Lot is mostly treed, other than where the transmission lines run through. Proposed retained lot is bordered by Battersea Road to the north, a neighbouring lot to the east, Mount Chesney Road and neighbouring lots to the south, and Frontenac Road to the west.

Topsoil

Retained

Depth of Soil ———->

Gav Limestone

0.0 m 0.3 m 0.6 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m Percolation rate (estimated):

Percolation rate (estimated):

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED V

Conditions:

Satisfactory

The proposed lot is capable of providing ?exibility in siting a sewage disposal system. The soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system.

Unsatisfactory V

The location of the sewage disposal system and speci?c requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development.

Site Flexible Site Specific

RETAINED V

Conditions:

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible Site Specific

Matthew Doyle Inspector: CPHI(C),Public Health Inspector

Approved:

Date: _

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICEOF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and willbe used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549 1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 92 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 5, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-19-17-S, S-20-17-S, S-21-17-S 1324782 Ontario Inc. Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 36/37 Battersea Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create three (3) new lots Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 73.3 +/- acres with frontage on McGarvey Road and Battersea Road. The lot is currently developed with an unoccupied livestock barn currently used for machine storage. The proposal is for the creation three (3) new residential lots each a minimum of 2 acres in size, with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Battersea Road. The northeastern most lot will also have frontage on McGarvey Road. A Minimum Distance Separation calculation has been completed for the unoccupied livestock barn and two (2) of the three (3) proposed lots lie partially or entirely within the area of influence. If the applicant wishes to proceed with these proposed lots, this barn needs to be formally decommissioned and the retained parcel rezoned to prevent the housing of livestock in any structure existing at the date of passage of the by-law. All three (3) proposed lots are outside the 500m area of influence for the nearby mineral aggregate designated lands. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lots. Current Zoning: Rural (RU)/Rural Industrial (RI) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Public Works have yet to be received. The building department has no objections. KFL&A has no objections and has indicated all three (3) proposed lots are flexible in terms of siting a septic system. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required.

Page 93 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-19-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Battersea Road.
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-20-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Battersea Road.
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-21-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Battersea Road and frontage on McGarvey Road.
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. (This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.)
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of each of the parcels in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; Page 94 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 9. The applicant shall obtain a partial demolition/alteration permit to remove the interior stall structures and complete the renovations prior to the stamping of the deeds for the lots to be created through Severance applications S-19-17-S, S-20-17-S and S-21-17-S. 10. The applicant shall rezone the retained parcel from Rural (RU) to a Special Rural zone which will prohibit the housing of livestock in any structure that exists on the property on the date of the passage of the by-law. Please see Planner Lindsay Mills to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Mulrooney Property Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 95 of 174

2965 McGarvey Road

1324780 ONTARIO INC. S-19-17-S S-20-17-S S-21-17-S

Legend

AT TE

Retained Parcel

MCGARVEY ROAD

1324782 Ontario Inc. Property

S-21-17-S (Lot 3)

1324782 Ontario Inc. Proposed Lots

S-20-17-S (Lot 2)

S-19-17-S (Lot 1) 2969 Frontenac Road

Page 96 of 174

FRONTENAC ROAD

Scale 1:3,000 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

120 Meters

Page 97 of 174

Page 98 of 174

K FL&A

IPILuIb Health¢’o http2//www.kf|apubl|chealth.ca

Environmental

ONSENT TO SEVE R

Health Department Receipt Number: SK-22-2017

File Number: S»21-17-S

Owner(s):

1324782 Ontario Inc. Ward / Former Township:

Municipality:

Township of South Frontenac

5t0f|’i?El0n V

Concession:

Lot:

Parts 36 & 37

Registered Plan:

Plan of Subdivision:

Part(s):

13R8488

Sublot:

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and sewage, etc)

Severed:

A mostly flat lot with patches of scrub trees and brush; the westernmost portion contains some wetlands. The proposed severed lot is bordered by the proposed retained lot to the north and west, a proposed severed lot to the east, Battersea Road to the south, and a neighbouring lot to the west.

Retained:

Large acreage with primarily agricultural use, existing barn on southeast side of lot. Proposed retained lot is bordered by a neighbouring lot to the north, McGarvey Road to the east, the proposed severed lots and neighbouring lots to the south, and a neighbouring lot to the west.

Depth of Soil »———>

Retained

0,0 m

03 m (16 m O9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m

Percolation rate (estimated):

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED V

Conditions:

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory V

The location of the sewage disposal system and speci?c requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development.

Site Flexible Site Specific

RETAINED V

Conditions:

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible Site Specific

Inspector:

Matthew Doyle

CPHl(C),Public Health Inspector

Approved;

Date: May 04, 2017

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&A PUBLICHEALTH. Personal informatlon on this form is collected under the authorlty of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Healt programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be dlrected to the Managerof Environmental Health, KFL&APublic h Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 99 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-16-17-L Richard Parslow Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 19, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section 7.3.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from HWM, within 15m from top of bank, within the 20m front yard setback, within the 3m side yard setback Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.5 +/- acres with frontage on Trotter Road and Shales Road. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the construction of a 30 foot by 40 foot (1200 square foot footprint) dwelling to be located 15m from the front property line, 2.5m from the side property line and 22m from the unnamed waterbody located on the property. This unnamed waterbody was enlarged to the current size by the previous owner and the applicant is in process with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to reduce the dimensions of this waterbody in order to increase the setback from the HWM. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

Page 100 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections to the proposal as submitted. KFL&A Public health has no objections to the proposal as the applicant has an has submitted and received approval for a permit to install a septic system on the lot. Public works has no objections. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 1200 square foot footprint dwelling to be constructed a minimum of 22m from the high water mark of the unnamed waterbody on a vacant property (ARN 102904004001430), a minimum of 15 from the front property line at Trotter Road and a minimum of 2.5m from the side property line.
Minor variance MV-16-17-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Parslow Property CRCA Letter

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 101 of 174

Mud Lake

Proposed House

5993 Trotter Road

O TR

ER TT

PARSLOW MV-16-17-L

Legend Parslow Property Parslow Proposed House Existing Buildings

SHALES ROAD

1263 Shales Road

Page 102 of 174

Scale 1:921 0

4.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

36 Meters

Page 103 of 174

Page 104 of 174

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-16-17—L) May 3, 2017

The CRCA, under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interferencewith Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, regulates development within 15 metres of a Valley land. The Valley of the watercourse is considered to extendto Trotter Road. Therefore, a CRCA permit will be required for the proposed development. The applicant will be required to contact the undersigned at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under Ontario Regulation 148/06.

Please notify this of?ce of any decision made by the Committee of Adjustment with regard to this application. If you have any questions, please contact Andrew Schmidt at (613) 546-4228 extension 24 or by email at aschmidt@crca.ca. 4 Yours truly,

Andrew Schmidt, C.Tech. Development Review Manager /as c.c.

Mr. Richard Parslow, 5993 Trotter Road, Perth Road, ON, KOH 2L0 Lindsay Mills, Planner (Via email)

Page 3of3

Page 105 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-17-17-B Norman Silva and Goretti Silva Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 32, District of Bedford Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section10.3.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit an increase in height of an accessory building Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit an increase in height of an accessory building be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.86 +/- acres with frontage on Fairhaven Lane and Bobs Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the construction of a 35 foot by 40 foot (1400 square feet) detached accessory building with a finished height of 24.5 feet to the peak. This additional height is required to permit the construction of a second floor storage area. The proposed accessory building is outside the 30m setback from the high water mark and meets all other setbacks as required in the comprehensive zoning by-law. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Rideau Valley Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.

Page 106 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 1400 square foot footprint accessory building with a finished height to peak of 24.5 feet. This accessory structure is not permitted to have any living space or plumbing.
Minor variance MV-17-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Silva Property

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 107 of 174

µ NE

Legend

AV E

P OI NT

L AN

SILVA MV-17-17-B

MIC A

FA IR H

Silva Existing House Silva Property Silva Proposed Garage

Bobs Lake

111 F 120 Mica Point Lane

119 Fa ir

ha ve

air ha

nL an

ve n

La ne

127 Fairhaven Lane Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

138 Mica Point Lane

Proposed Garage

Bobs Lake

Page 108 of 174

Scale 1:1,500 0

5 10

40 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

l l?

/m;

i’lll(l:h. Qmllr???*’m?‘ffi

’l

W’

€

‘% a%;

{}

Z’ a t

ffl??

?€ a

Ea a e

}!‘I?q*’! f}

;”#

?!!

w.gwa i0’?

ttg

:fl

r.<

‘Q.

!“l

‘P!a’-x=%s=vQ<V ‘fl?

r & a Q €

!’

ffB

l:?

[! J Y

kwtj

W% a:.:. ::.a i?i.p?–. ?<-, , ,,:,,,’, ? :’.,,’.J,

P.:’ ?’%

‘@J r r%?

q? ? jJ

l[ffi’u;

W-

k’

{4 i.Xi

0 q

N N

a s ‘4

N @ M

?J 4’l

!!$11 $ !l

%*l

l l

a l [f? l?

l’A’? -i imji gi mill}

M ta

Iffi

H B

,)J

m W W *

€

ff?‘rm%%

{ f! (l

k’tl

t Wl (WM &i

==’:ia)! *@’ j. i; .I” ?si&

l tl

!!‘ffitl@. ‘??-Q ? ?bal€???lx.:xia-k?

%’s

a 9

:N3)

L ! u

) y

s (;,

{

l$%

Rq i-q

M o * ?’

]))

a Z

i wm

M?+????

Page 109 of 174

J k

I!’l)? ii’.n? )’ 0%?

))’ !%?

11 11

i:ll

a;i 0

llil: i it i

‘- : li l

s ‘1 El

?!! @-

ivc t IT

l——-

‘.:ill

:ll:: 11 11 : 11 11; 1111 :; 1111 j

Elllll l}111’,

!111111: 1111 j; 1111 i il 11

i 11 11 j jirj

‘a

.1 lv

11 11 il :l

illi: lill i

i:iiii:

‘11111:

1111: :I?

-‘h

‘a

?fi i

h? a

??? i

l .1

——-l}}‘II?

!’-%? ix’.n?

ATK[NEN

5276 Hinchinbrooke Road

mH?

Hartington Ontario. KOH IW0

?&!4J ? ? xi&xn

bui}<Fmg ce+rbe

:Wl-

Proposed Custom Whistler 1

Tel: (61.3). 372-2!:!!

Fax: (613) 372-0009 @ Copyiighl ATKIIIISON Home Building Cevare

Mark & Wendy Silya

DE81GNER

SCALE

DATC

DRAWING TITLE

Keith Almond

3/16? =..1:-0"

November 22, 2016

Foundation

DRAWING #

Page 110 of 174

{

10’ 0?

} }I’)l’

I?l)?

174’

ll’t’

‘j k!‘cllX’

sh?

l:l

iz?

51 o ffl l:

’l

lD'6’

l?!’-D?

?–!—

?l?

?l? ?—!–

:- - ffi :- ? - ? - ? - - - ? - ? - - - ? - ? - ? - - - ? + - - - - ; ffi ? ?-

—l—l !%?

t’ )i.’

IE 16l=

l’=

l":

l!’

l==

; ; ; ‘? ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; : ; ‘-’ ; ; : ?‘a ; ; ; ; ; -‘a ; : ; W

}4’-0’

10’-0?

is, l:

M’?ll?

a’ O?

l T

M-

N!?a?!’

ll’?0?

ll’*’

II’O’ 10’-n?

5276 Hinchinbrooke Road

Proposed Custom Whistler 1

Hartington Ontario. KOH IWO Tel: (613) 372-2838 Fax: (613) 372-0009 @ Copyi!ghk ATKINSON Home Building Cen(ie W

r 3/16: = i’-0" SCALE

Mark & Wendy Silva

DATE

DRAWING TITLE

November 22, 2016

Main Floor

DRAlllllNG# 2

Page 111 of 174

-wmmmmmmm

ix’-n’

k l’ }?

l)’ }?

][‘aN!?

i: i#

ir l

:!i

l’ l

‘B ?l ?l (

(

?l ?l

?l (

11; 81=;

(

:l’

(

%‘U’

;

l? l ‘a

)t’ 0?

W’vlV?

{l’?r

ll’.}? ll’.n’

kmHSDH

5276 Hinchinbrooke Road

i%0?

Hartington Ontario. KOH IWO Tel: (613) 372-2838 Fax: (613) 372-0009 @ Copyrighk ATKIN!)ON Home Building Cenkre

i=.l :;;t’ff=i

Keith Almond

Proposed Custom Whistler 1

Mark & Wendy Silva DRAWING TITLE

SCALE

OATE

3/16? = 1’-0"

November 22, 2016 l Second Floor Plan

DRAWING#

Page 112 of 174

‘?

%’

ffl

x l?

‘,uN

Q A

‘0’

:-l

?. -l

1?:.

[,J

M N

‘?i

1.=, jg N%[i:-.!

J’im )+

-W

‘%’

8’-7?

n=‘ii

‘.-g

l.?

(.€!r =l

}.1

17)()

cb§ g,, 5a2

ttn

5GI

s l

tti

28’-9? n l.ffi

@kJ

k Z

AREA ‘-aM

Page 113 of 174

W fl

U %

?+@

!i l! Z

R.E

fll

(ffiQ=,’:l’m

s ‘i2 j{}

!alg=Th

ffli ‘-

(l!

(ai

fT’J

l R

:$1

?‘V

????ffl?’

W @Nl

-’@

‘?A

la’i 10.

!&!l

‘f:‘r4%

g4?!Q

ffl I’lWa; X*’=<:;l

‘[

.’=“tJ..’?’+-‘qQFfifi’v

‘(

lwa

!!w!q

l)l -+

?4 %Ry

’ i Pz 1,

JMffia

:Jl

:ffl.i.

)f!I

J -! m

!!ffi

g’fl [1

l -=m

{)l

l’Jl

l(’l

{amJ

lfl

i 011

!) ttbt

}l,i

{:]

g ff

&ll

? M? ? ? h%?’

%a.

]

01 ({

l’ l? '

:!}

m 1,h

a f’r’ff!I

I J.’

i,” - a

‘ff

ffl }

}ii

t, t <BMW.A /3p%

-W-

f’l

,=-?’

‘?llll))9 {tl

‘j

ill?

3%?

-,53'4 ’ :?.(?.,"?"?..€’,’*J?’

IW r

lqffl)4 4%,iJ*

{?a '

Mj ?J?@’l?

{%l

W’=L?

eM 0%

!@:

tb J

%?:?

!=?;-’!

Yb%a#

4’.‘fJ.W

a?lll tx

’l’.;5i ?,.?Qs 5’ ;–Oe

(!l a :) 5’ 0 ? # aa q ! s e ;. %

nBm ' a, 0 1%) % X

r!i"““iH

A n

{IJ

69(lagffi

N !€ fl iJi{

?!.!M

i r} l

tmi

R {‘J %l:

ffl e Wl’

1+ &

.al.)

‘(/*JA

k J

!!!,

l h %l?l?]

8?’. 8

!.’l

J *:QTh

LJ t-l

‘.f!lffl.}4’}

&:.l

ffi

i. [%!

b a

Tfi)

W {’%’.%a

ff’

*";ga

=4fly::Q%

, ,,

kJ j?%.‘q{q.

N’

tti

AREA

r:.bM

itm-

,% Ai

l.m

{t%B

€vvo’ Q:

U !$

IC-

l%i’li

J ,‘smi,

? )o ,i

il A

liltltt!111111

)!11

!?u

&l$!?.tffi?

{tlt?lll

3 o

@ l

@,J;slali.i:,l?

Q?I(% ?.(il;,!

ff!]

2’ull!

i?’ 3’! hsyxem

‘1. l.larlA.,

J ii,ii,l.lii m

] “JN

§g

l r*

{Wl

dinl

:J.i?!

@“t’J

N,”,’

I%{

B’;y,4ytn ]

?,Q%

ffl

.@41 h

l?.. !N

m ;tP

g%? :’%xf)!!3ol,Wll,,,,,l??a. “’l,. tl !‘i’

%l?.M*A

‘!

€

’ ?l vmm

Page 114 of 174

‘M’

‘M

!.4

l’

?W 6%

11}!fl

Th%Th

N %

N 11 ?

11’ y ‘J’t

Q%!l .%..l l,;ii l€ MV

s !

NEEE? [LJf??lFi

’l’; m

ltmalfflffll

ffl

l!+

?h’

?ffi u}

lataaa loaao [lgOai g€00

EQ l mJ N"Bo’f

=-…. Al

lQQgi

l aJ !

((

PWI

$bT;f4

(6.

i{0

ffl*

l! %%l%lffl g

‘kL” N ' !f?;%J J

‘;’!f?l.TW’JW?

fl#‘R’

tsll

fiffl

‘W !‘J Jil

!VI?R!

ff,.?r%,Q

J,M

I ’ . I!la?’!! i,,%%

ajl

fl.$!A” ‘-k A !W,P:.&ffl z, i’a=

W!.$

, “,)ml

[110!!!!21

1 ffll ‘!’t'5’!m

AX%$:m'4?’

!T!Qg l$[]i

aa’f ‘%’

a s

Wll

i’i .

!11!

?,’ G,’? ? ? &.?’( fi,a? ?J’

m,,

-‘I

{%t

“P

!“fi

l i!

M$lll p’rl k

‘N

{fflq

@4(1

ff U

E’i, rN

,= # s :l-

?’>-?2 :E) ?! ?g?’ 3’ ?z’ ,c,l!!! 7 0’;(,)gj

*’l’?”??a’a’JR’! " ‘. ? S’S

ia!-it

‘(:)N ?

IP ?3

j IU ?,if’ 111 1%

—l

l{ 10 10

ttt ?

m # 56 ! 15

4al%”

nl”’::

;-i

?el e5 (15 IJI . 11 w ’ l-17

%!‘al

i NM

Q%::

?b l’li

€ E’

d@i

l.&

II):i

hJm

/ <

‘J

h !

#i;;-

[€

ffla

a k

l%.% 31 lls

? al

J)a

j!a

*.oo"l?’ (1. {.. ‘, {,. ‘,’,l’l.@a

ttai? m tl

r Page 115 of 174 I

roam

? jW

t $4

€

lTh

aljppex

f 11 <

W’ J

;3 I

o- 7 €s

Page 116 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-18-17-S Janet Brown Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 17/18, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section10.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 6.66 +/- acres with frontage on Huntbach Lane and Dog Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling (4806 Huntbach Lane). The proposal is for the construction of a 160 square foot footprint screen porch addition to be located a minimum of 25.2m from the high water mark of Dog Lake. There is currently a deck in place which extends past the end of the dwelling to approximately 25m from the HWM. The applicant intends to remove the existing deck structure and rebuild the entire thing at the same time as construction the screen porch addition and remove all portions of the deck which extend past the structure. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

Page 117 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team has evaluated the proposal and have no objections to the application. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 160 square foot footprint screen porch addition to an existing structure located at 4806 Huntbach Lane to be located a minimum of 25m from the high water mark of Dog Lake.
Minor variance MV-17-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Brown Property Rideau Waterway Development Review Team comments.

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 118 of 174

µ Dog Lake

BROWN MV-18-17-S HUNTBACH LA

Legend Brown Existing House

Proposed Screen Room

Brown Proposed Screen Room Brown Existing Deck Brown Property

4806 HUNTBACH LANE

Dog Lake

Page 119 of 174

Scale 1:384 0 1.75 3.5

Dog Lake

10.5

14 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

aterway‘ Tealn

Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Kapusta:

Re:

Application for Minor Variance MV-18-17-S (Brown) Lots 17, 18, Concession 10; 4806 Huntbach Lane Storrington District, Township of South Fmmemac Waterbody: Dog Lake “““““‘

‘

The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from theCataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance, and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. Summary of the Proposal The proposal involves the construction of an addition onto an existing dwelling on the subject property. The variance is requested to: Reduce the required setback from the high water mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.(l.) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 25.12 metres in order to permit the construction of an addition.

Site Description The property is located on the east shore of Dog Lake. The topography. of the property can be described as a gently rising slope toward the location of the existing dwelling on the property.

The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Limited Service Residential Waterfront’ (RLSW) in the implementing Zoning By-law.

Worlunglugethcr In Um: lzrzviromncnt J’arI<s(ianaxda-Ridmu(lanai 613-285-7199

? RidmuVzt?cy(ilunserwtinn Authority [ Calaraqui Region Crn1.~fu‘v;1li(>n Authority 613-692-3571

613-346-4228

Page 120 of 174

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-l 8-17-S) May 1, 2017

Discussion The main interests of the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of natural hazards associated with the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values of the Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Natural Hazards Flooding: The maximum recorded water level for Dog Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. For Dog Lake, bah-..|::r::i:-unun-u-:n.iuuuu|-arc”-1.;n.p-—1drL:a1r1u1 the highest recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered ?ood plain. 7I’In.u.r.ni.".I.‘p-:1The CRCA’s Guidelines I-|uI.’|‘I’. (see for Implementing Ontario Regulation m|:?|all development description below) requires that be hrlrlplu-ulll?ctnu F|Iu|;d.l|rI’. 148/06 :uI.?u|.I:I’I|‘I’|:I.I|’.I.l.;|-Ii] I-|q,|jIa|.| h u,;|.g.H;..g.p’ back a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. 5.-.-.I..pm-=1.-an set Based upon elevation IfHcIInhmmnT?rI!IuId’ccnIHrI|5I1In:11rl-3:-1|-H::f:wun’huI’;r. mapping data, the proposed development will be located outside of the setback from the regulatory ?ood plain. Erosion: Section 5.8.2 (2) of the Zoning by-law requires that no building or structure or septic tank installation shall be located within 15 metre horizontal of the top of bank of any embankment, the slope of which is greater than 30% from horizontal. CRCA policy de?nes the extent of potential erosion Iii-lI2HI|‘2|:l2|I:I||uI|II!I?-I:|I.—uI.I|.‘F:I| hazards to include an allowance for toe stable slope allowance for till shorelines of 3(h):1(v), erosion, aIlHI’.Iriu:I|:IrI’J-nIII::IF:I’HJ:£n’:I.’:In-H1-|Lj:1|u’[|. I.r::r:II.I.Iu. plus an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. E11-Tlflh?mi-TI |:I|I::II:I1.I:iI.nI.I:I1IJ.|I.rIII’::I:n-|‘Ii:nnbu. Based on an estimated 1 metre high slope, the total hazard allowance is anticipated to be approximately 9 metres measured horizontally inland from erosion uunumhujllhwnllun?jb-hq:p’::m.&.IPm.?un.j1dru’m1nJ|:pnl-df:I’I LI.|:?IH-|:t:I:-:|’:iu:I|::|J:tIlIl.:I’t’n. the stable toe of slope at the shoreline. Staff note that the proposed development will be located outside !nH1:u?md’l.:pI:q:.nln1?I.1.|?1ltHnt.pL;L:.|n¢.|.]1’?|.|.¢ of the erosion hazard allowance as de?ned by the CRCA. Water Quality Section 5.8.2 (1.) of the Zoning By-Law for South Frontenac Township suggests that a 30 metre setback from the high water mark is required to be maintained as a buffer in order to protect water quality. The Of?cial Plan also requires that this buffer area be maintained as a natural vegetative buffer strip adjacent to the water’s edge to ?lter pollutants from runoff.

Similarly, the CRCA Planning Policy recommends that new development and site alteration, including septic system tile ?elds and open or encloseddecks/patios attached to the main dwelling, be set back a l:pIh.:.‘Ihm?:?:ih:H.npu:mdi.I:d&I1’|i5ndEh£hb:m:hdndh’q.Hd’u:tL minimum distance of 30 metres from the high water mark of a waterbody. 2||uIIIII.‘I’.:IlI’-:IuI’I-I‘-1;I1’.I1 ::::E:::nd:?:::raf1I2In:u’:I!|’m.Euh’.?Iin"u.¢a1’lI?I’h-nd’f. However, new development the within setback be considered when water there reasonable may are alternatives for locating the no tH:nlhI?n’Ilh:tnnh:nliIIdi+-.&n:n1lbruJn?II:I1uuuhr|;qy1q;I1¢ development outside of the water setback area, the development is no closer to the water than existing ?n’daplt.’=ddqar?liuIld’It1.fu.h.I?‘p1n4Hm.;hpu’??ji[?¢*_uhLh. buildings structures on the property, the development complies with the maximum lot coverage of the Zoning By-law, provisions and suitable methods to minimize negative impacts on water quality |:l’I2I’I"II:IE:|-I2I!’|II|IEI%‘E|_H’I.uIl:i’HI|:’nIdh.IIHhIn.::::I.I:jJh1m—ItIIn’n’:h’:|’.H.Irf are incorporated into the development.

The proposed development involves the construction of an addition in the location of an existing deck which is reasonable, the development is no closer to the water than the existing deck, and the proposal complies with the maximum lot coverage provisions contained in the By-law. Staffrecommend that roofruno? be directed away fromthe lake ifpossible. Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site Similarly, RWDRT staff strive to preserve and enhance the cultural, natural and scenic Values of the national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy this legacy into the future.

PagePage 2 of 3 121 of 174

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-18-17-S) May 1, 2017

This can be achieved through the maintenance of a natural shoreline, the maintenance and enhancement of vegetation on the property, development which complements the visual character of the landscape, and the maintenance of a minimum 30 metre setback of all development from the water. RWDRT staff have no objection to the development proposal since the addition will be constructed in the location of an existing deck. Recommendation hllruI::I:u1JuT::H.in’.rE|u’-LI-1T-H’:.j-:’.::I’na’.nil1:h1 RIH1-‘1T£‘tI’|’|!’lI.|l*l-l’.1.i-H staff have no objection to RWDRT the approval of application MV-18-17-S based on our consideration for natural hazards, natural and cultural heritage, and Water quality and quantity protection policies.

Parks Canada Rideau Canal Of?ce oversees all in-water works along the Canal system. If the landowner wishes to carry out any in-water works in the future, the Rideau Canal Of?ce must be contacted and written approval obtained prior to the commencement of construction.

2 Il1’l.I:1nIu.‘uII1u-tu.u-.l:;:l.u.-.u|.-IuI.l-I-ICRCA’s Ontario Regulation 148/06 Please note that a portion of the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, FElumhlhdI1u’hnd’hlpupu’|1hnbj-um?uih?¢pJ.?qg|4{1£;?p,-d.Hg.ug’ with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which ,- Interference hI.n’Fu’m:ltI’hhh’-l|.nd1r|dMLrIhu1nE|‘rrl|lu.ul’#-Hahn… is administeredby -|-.’.-I-i.—irri-.-iu-n-.:r|I.-.the The CRCA. purpose of the regulation isI1to ensure that and site TI’—n’u -1‘ “H proposed changes (e. W“ TI-‘TI’I’f-I 1 g. “development jalteration) to a property are 1 1 affected not by natural such ?ooding hazards, as and and that the erosion, ?t: ?h tum II‘ HWIFMI changes do other not properties put at greater risk from these hazards. Within a regulated area, written -ZIIJ‘TJI—?I-—JJI-II-II:I:LTI—–I-I2:-I— permission must be obtained from the CRCA prior to development taking place. However, staff note that a CRCA permit is not required for the proposed development. ’

F-*——-=-”""

V_,,-£+vr-’~-

Andrew Schmidt, C. Tech. Development Review Manager /as c.c.

Janet Brown, 4806 Huntbach Lane, Battersea, ON, KOH 1H0 Susan Millar, Parks Canada (via email) Lindsay Mills, Planner (Via email)

PagePage 3 of 3 122 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-19-17-B Steven Ryckman and Cindy Ryckman Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 9, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section10.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.0 +/- acres with frontage on West Devil Lake Lane and Devil Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling (199 West Devil Lake Lane). The proposal is for the construction of a 12 foot by 34 foot deck to be located a minimum of 26.3m (86.3 feet) from the high water mark of Devil Lake. There is currently a 2.2 m (7.5 ft.) wide deck and stairs located on the water side, the proposed deck will extend a further 1.5m into the setback from the HWM. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

Page 123 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority is recommending denial of the application as they feel it does not meet the intent of the Official Plan. CRCA notes that the proposed development is outside the setback from the flood plain and outside the erosion hazard area identified on the property. They have also indicated that a permit will be required for all development on this property. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 12 foot by 34 foot deck to be located a minimum of 26.3m from the high water mark of Devil Lake.
Minor variance MV-19-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Ryckman Property Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority comments

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 124 of 174

µ RYCKMAN MV-19-17-B Devil Lake

Legend

Proposed Deck

Ryckman Existing Cottage Ryckman Property Ryckman Proposed Deck

Page 125 of 174

Scale 1:300 0

1.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

12 Meters

CATARAQUIREGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, OntarioKOH1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956-CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E—mai|: info@crca.ca Websites:www.crca.ca 8: www.c|eanwatercataraqui.ca

May 3, 2017

Ms. J ennie,Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Kapusta: Re:

Application for Minor Variance MV-19-17-B (Ryckman) Part Lot 9, Concession 10; 199 West Devil Lake Road Township of South Frontenac (Bedford) Waterbody: Devil Lake (Buce Bay)

Page 126 of 174

Page 127 of 174

—-I

I.-.-..

I’I2-I’I_|:l._|.-|.|.|.

-If-—JJ’u

IJ—I-E-—-II-I-IT

I-—’-L-

—I

|…|.l_-I.-I

Page 128 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-20-17-B Paul & Janice McNichols Concession 3, Lot/Part Lot 7, District of Bedford Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section10.3.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit an increase in height of an accessory building Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.24 +/- acres with frontage on McNichols Lane and Thirty Island Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling and small accessory building. The proposal is for the construction of a 20 foot by 46 foot (920 square feet) detached accessory building with a finished height of 23.6 feet to the peak. This additional height is required to permit the construction of a second floor storage area. The proposed accessory building is outside the 30m setback from the high water mark and meets all other setbacks as required in the comprehensive zoning by-law. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Rideau Valley Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections. Page 129 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 1400 square foot footprint accessory building with a finished height to peak of 23.6 feet. This accessory structure is not permitted to have any living space.
Minor variance MV-20-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of McNichols Property

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 130 of 174

µ MCNICHOLS MV-20-17-B

Thirty Island Lake

Legend McNichols Property McNichols Proposed Garage

Proposed Garage

Existing Buildings

IC MCN HO L S LA NE

Page 131 of 174

Scale 1:767 0

IDE HILLS

L ANE

3.75 7.5

22.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

30 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-21-17-S Nicholas Harvey Concession 9, Lot/Part Lot 19, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section10.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 0.9 +/- acres with frontage on Ormsbee Road and Dog Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling (1517 Ormsbee Road) located approximately 26.8m from the high water mark of Dog Lake. The proposal is for a three (3) foot increase in height of the existing structure to permit an increase in living space on the second floor, as well as the creation of an outdoor deck above the existing covered porch which will be accessed from the upper level. The structure currently has a small upper loft area but the floor space is limited due to the pitch of the roof. This application is seeking to rectify a building without a permit situation discovered by the Chief Building Official. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Residential Waterfront (RW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

Page 132 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team has no objection to the application as it does not encroach any farther into the required setback from the HWM and does not increase the lot coverage. CRCA noted that a permit is required for the proposed development. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required as the applicant has already upgraded his septic system to accommodate the renovations. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for a maximum three (3) foot increase in height to peak of an existing dwelling located at 1517 Ormsbee Road to permit an increase in living space, in addition to the construction of a new second story deck over an existing lower level porch.
Minor variance MV-21-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Harvey Property RWDRT comments

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 133 of 174

E LA N WI LD LIF E

ORMSBEE RD

HARVEY MV-21-17-S ORMSBEE R

O AD

Legend Harvey Property

1517 ORMSBEE RD

Existing Buildings

1519 ORMSBEE RD Dog Lake

1539 ORMSBEE RD

1521 ORMSBEE RD

Page 134 of 174

1531 ORMSBEE RD

Scale 1:767 0

3.75 7.5

22.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

30 Meters

1é&€au aterway

’

1bun1

Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Kapusta:

Re:

Application for Minor Variance MV-21-17-S (Harvey) Lot 19, Concession 9; 1517 Ormsbee Road Storrington District, Township of SouthFrontenac Waterbody: Dog Lake

The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance, and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. Summary of the Proposal The proposal involves the construction of a second storey addition onto an existing dwelling on the subject property. The variance is requested to:

Reduce the required setback from the high water mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.(1.) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 26.82 metres in order to permit the construction of a second storey addition. 0

The property is located on the west shore of Dog Lake. The topography of the property can be described as a moderately rising slope toward the location of the existing dwelling on the property. The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Limited Service Residential Waterfront’ (RLSW) in the implementing Zoning By-law.

.1;

uaduah

Togcthtrrin One _E11Virorm1e11t W01‘!<ing Parks Cu|1udu—l{idcuuCanal 65j«3$3-7l39

Ridmu

=_,

' ‘ '

6I3—b92—3571

Aulhorily I C211;1r21quiRegi4)n (’§0nserv;1Liux1Amhnrily bl3»546=4228

Page 135 of 174

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-21-17-S) May 1, 2017

The main interests of the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of natural hazards associated with the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values of the Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site. Natural Hazards Flooding: The maximum recorded water level for Dog Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. For Dog Lake, the highest recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered ?ood plain. ‘.|1’|.II!:II|’.J.‘i.i.’|I.:|u’lul|I.I.|. |IrE’H.|:HIHmID.nII:II-inlrrI:IiJLIuJ:nLinnI:Lu’.[m.d£u?p.nL The CRCA’s Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation 148/06 (see description below) requires that all development be Fshu-lI::E;|:hhuIIq.I.dmLW?Ij::Iu:‘rp?i?n|nqum&nIr.dnI?:;¢¢ut¢ Illh? set back aI::u::I’.::L:I?:n:bI minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. Based h::I1’|.II’g.IL:|:I'5’|‘lunI’.:q;I.I.I1.1rJ’I.’nl’l;.:.:|]. upon elevation B§.|.|-:|-‘“.=|._-.-i_i.. the mapping proposed data, development be located will outside of the setback from the regulatory ?ood l?l?l?-HuHlFl!?ddl’HIFTI$|?“H|H-Ht!hlHH¢T?tH?Ii5$mlhrIqL1mr[hud plain. Erosion: Section 5.8.2 (2) of the Zoning by-law requires that no building or structure or septic tank installation shall be located within 15 metre horizontal of the top of bank of any embankment, the slopeof which is greater than 30% from horizontal. CRCA policy de?nes the extent of potential erosion hazards to include an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for till shorelines of 3(h):1(v), plus an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. Based on an estimated 2 metre high slope, the total erosion hazard allowance is anticipated to be approximately 12 metres measured horizontally inland from the stable toe of slope at the shoreline. Staff note that the proposed development will be located outside of the erosion hazard allowance as de?ned by the CRCA. ‘

Section 5.8.2 (1.) of the Zoning By-Law for South Frontenac Township suggests that a 30 metre setback from the high water mark is required to be maintained as a buffer in order to protect water quality. The Of?cial Plan also requires that this buffer area be maintained as a natural vegetative buffer strip adjacent to the water’s edge to ?lter pollutants from runoff.

Similarly, the CRCA Planning Policy recommends that new development and site alteration, including septic system tile ?elds and open or enclosed decks/patios attached to the main dwelling, be set back a l!‘fHf§’l-’|1H*HHfdt?m?¢b:¥HH?nh’pii&1:hu1wlh:1?’.hdlh;hIth¢: minimum distance of 30 metres from the high water mark of a waterbody. However, ?i1.i:L|.lhIl.HIHIJT3iJEmbnE!=|lr3n’;in’:t::u’LnI’In’?n’l::|5. new development |”.’:I’II|’|.‘IIu’..n:I:hI.’:Iqn.l’|: within the water setback may be considered when there are no reasonable alternatives for locating the Hi?hh:n’:h’mIIi:qrbunmn:h’:£rimL|mIJum:I—m.?J?hTl?’—.hh:n’i1? outside of the water setback area, the development is no closer to the water than existing development -hTdi.I|=:?.nhmd’ErIinll:I.uu.EI5hI.’d$ltumH:nrm_&1nm’?g3y;j1;‘ buildings or I.’|‘EI’,|’|.|I;|.||?.I..1.’.,q structures on the property, the development complies with ‘!|In.hE1-:’?’::hn’:I::ILhl;:Inlq.I.tIlduI’.Iiq1T-1n1T.|‘Hu the maximum lot coverage p;-1; provisions of the Zoning By-law, and suitable methods to minimize negative impacts on water quality :I’l’“llIl’l|?li'3l-ll|.rl[|“ll’I’.I|dli’li1’||ff-lI’Ii:IH1IJ I:I.l:I.?.iI!’lrEI|:l’I’.‘IE’i.:q:II.1.II.l’.-IIi:I|’:IhI:.’ incorporated into the development. aref?1Ik lI

The proposed development involves the construction of a second storey addition in the locationof an existing dwelling which is reasonable, the development is no closer to the water than the existing nb.:I:hI’%lJh.‘hl:h’.?-:Ip:n.?u:ad:nrl:hlI’nI?.u11p’¢q1n_i5_. I:I.i.£L[EIII:|.|.b.| dwelling, and the proposal complies with the maximum lot coverage provisions contained in the By-law. “d’n’dhngmdblp’q:—Jmupbn&1qncmm?nnI1FpTuwmn:d’q?|jL;’?g?3~hg I.||:| roofruno?’ be :I2|I.Ir.I.I:|’:|’-u:..|’|u.I directed away fromd-I-hl..| the lake .:|”|;|.;…..:q!p_ recommendthat IIIn;|‘IIu|.n;|’|‘h| .’?‘rI:2.:I:I Sta?’ ifpossible. Rideau 53"!‘--1 Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site Similarly, RWDRT staff strive to preserve and enhance the cultural, natural and scenic values of the I3’IH.lh’h’.E'5E|HTI£‘minhp1’arndmhum’inu?n1Lmtu?ud|1.:u?lI.nf?u national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy this legacy into the future. mHInLHJuuih.uJwuHb’E|.plk:-LhdHJLnlhml:nup11uluf::rbn1?¢?ru’¢

Page 136 of 174

Page 2 of 3

Page 137 of 174

9010 A Perth Road

BRICE MV-22-17-B

Legend

Devil Lake

Brice Existing Building Brice Property Brice Proposed Addition

9010 B-C Perth Road H RO PERT

9011 Perth Road

Proposed Addition

Page 138 of 174

Scale 1:972

8 Cottontail Lane

UTM Projection NAD 83

40 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-22-17-B Roger Brice Concession 13, Lot/Part Lot 8, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.8.2 and section18.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.5 +/- acres with frontage on Perth Road and Devil Lake. The property is zoned RRC-34 and permits three tourist cabins, a single detached dwelling and an accessory storage building. The proposal is for the addition of a 100 square foot mudroom to the non-water side of the existing principal dwelling located approximately 20m from the high water mark of Devil Lake. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained? And
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Recreational Resort Commercial-Special Zone 34 (RRC-34) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections as the permit issued for the renovations to the building included the proposed mudroom. Page 139 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required as the applicant has already upgraded his septic system to accommodate the renovations. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 100 square foot mudroom addition to an existing dwelling located 20m from the HWM of Devil Lake.
Minor variance MV-22-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Brice Property RWDRT comments

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 140 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-23-17-B Tony & Michelle Kimmett Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 23/24, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.10.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 43.9 +/- acres with frontage on Lee Road and Wolfe Lake. The property is currently developed with a seasonal dwelling and small accessory building. The proposal is for an increase in height (a maximum of 6 feet) of the existing dwelling to permit the reconstruction of the foundation and the creation of a crawlspace underneath the cottage to locate services. The dwelling is located approximately 55 feet at its closest point to Wolfe Lake and is within 120m of a Provincially Significant Wetland; as such, the applicant has submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment completed by Ontario Lake Assessments which stated there would be no long-term impacts as a result of the proposed construction. However, the EIA indicated that there needs to be appropriate soil stability measures taken during and after construction to prevent disruption of the native soil mantle. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Residential Waterfront (RW-35) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes Page 141 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Rideau Valley Conservation Authority have yet to be received. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the raising of an existing dwelling (966 Lee Road) a maximum of six (6) feet to permit the reconstruction of the foundation and the creation of a crawlspace underneath the cottage to locate services; no living space is permitted.
Minor variance MV-23-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Kimmett Property RWDRT comments

Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 142 of 174

µ Wolfe Lake

KIMMETT MV-23-17-B

Legend Kimmett Existing Building Kimmett property

Cottage to be Raised

Subject Property Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 143 of 174

Scale 1:460 0

2.25 4.5

13.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

18 Meters

Page 144 of 174

Potential for Impacts and Remedial Measures: ected as a result 0 this ro osal. There is however the potential for disruption acts There are no Ion -term loss offill material by way of erosion into the lake during the constmction and mantle ofjsite native soil the for of due to the close proximity to the lake and wetland. Appropriate construction soil stability measures must be implanented to prevent this from occurring during construction and afterwards.Excavation materials removed from the foundationarea and surplus to the baclqill requirements must be removed fromthe area to the borrow pit area near to the Lee Road entrance. '

Also the native shoreline bufferof trees adjacent too and in front ofthe cottage need to be protected from damage by heavy equipment during the construction period. The trees should beflagged and a protective measure put in place so equipment operators avoid damaging these trees. While not a condition of this Preliminary EIA, serious consideration should be given relocating the dock to the east shoreline in front of the cottage at the site of the present east access and then replanting the shoreline at the

south water access point. It is important wetland habitat and should be leftnatural.

There will not be a need to undertake a full ELAwith respect to this proposal since there will be no furtherintrusion into the 120 metre zone of in?uence distance from the PSW and no further intrusion into the 30m buffernext to WolfeLake. If you have any questions in the above regard, please contact me.

Respect?llly yqours,

gm d Genge B.Sc. Ontario Lake Assessments 3654 Stage Coach Road RR #3 I-IARROWSMITH, Ontario KOH 1V0 rge11ge@) 613-376-3863

Copy to: Tony Kimmett RR #4 Napanee, ON K7R 3K9 (Three pages of photographs #1 through #5 attached) 11:‘j—‘j

Page 145 of 174

Page 146 of 174

Page 147 of 174

Photograph 5- View Snutherly inm the (PS “9 Wetland

Page 148 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: May 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-24-17-S Carolyn Anglin Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 4, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.10.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit construction within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.49 +/- acres with frontage on Loughborough Lake. This property is unique in that while it is possible to drive to it via Hickory Lane it is essentially an island with a bridge to the mainland. The property is currently developed with a seasonal dwelling (1050 square feet plus 515 square foot deck) and small accessory building (less than 100 square feet) located 48 feet from the high water mark (HWM) of Loughborough Lake. The proposal is for the demolition of all existing structures on the property and the construction of a 1660 square foot dwelling plus rebuilding the same size deck to be located a minimum of 50 feet from the HWM. The applicant has also proposed the construction of a new 385 square foot detached garage as a future outbuilding also to be located a minimum of 50 feet from the HWM. The proposed dwelling and accessory buildings are to be located approximately 50 feet from Loughborough Lake and within 120m of a Provincially Significant Wetland; as such, the applicant has submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) completed by Ontario Lake Assessments. The EIA suggests there is an opportunity to move the proposed cottage to the south somewhat to achieve a slightly better setback from the HWM and permit the possible construction of a full septic system as opposed to the two (2) tank holding tank setup currently being used. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Page 149 of 174

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority have yet to be received. Comments from KFL&A Public Health have yet to be received. The building department has no objections. Comments from Public Works were not required.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for construction of a maximum 1660 square foot dwelling (single story, no basement permitted) plus a maximum 550 square foot deck and a maximum 385 square foot detached accessory building (storage only, no living space permitted) to be located a minimum of 50 feet from the high water mark of Loughborough Lake.
Minor variance MV-24-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Anglin Property

Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 150 of 174

µ ANGLIN MV-24-17-B

Legend Anglin Property

Proposed

Proposed Cottage Proposed Deck

Existing

Existing Cottage Existing Deck

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Loughborough Lake

Page 151 of 174

Scale 1:614 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

24 Meters

l l l ll l

7al ]l

OF LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE

AND NORTH SHORELINE

(FORMERLY GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF STORRINGTON)

(AS SHOWN ON P1)

Ii l

A 44

iL-’!) <i-rI

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC iL-<) <i-7l

1!? metres

] t

q l

METRIC

DISTANCES & COORDINATES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDING BY O.3048

LESLIE M. HIGGINSON SURVEYING Ltd. 2016

THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR

BILL ANGLIN & THE

NOT TO SCALE

UNDERSIGNED ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR USE BY OTHER PARTIES

1 I

f f

/ WE

/ /

I ] l l ( l ] l l

] l l f

1 : 200

SCALE:

?% sJ

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC (GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF PITTSBURGH)

INTERSECTION OF LINE

BETWEEN LOTS 4 & s, CON. 10

PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF LOT 4 CONCESSION 10

1 l

SURVEYOR’S CERTIF?CATE:

%,, ?0

CL s ,= i

l CERTIFY THAT:

THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE

‘j ;o ;Q l <2 I i

Page 152 of 174

%, u<, 7

], / /

RECULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM.

l l f

%C’

SURVEYORS ACT, THE LAND TITLES ACT AND THE

<@’

] I l

THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016. 4x

LESLIE M. HICG?NSON SURVEYING Ltd. ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR KINGSTON, ONTARIO

NOTE

&, LEGEND:

BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM

GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE RELATED TO MONUMENTS ORP A AND ORP B

HAVING .A BEAR!NG OF.N32'04'40"W, UTM ZONE 18, (7!5” WEST LONGITUDE) NAD83 (CSRS) (1997.0). COMPARISONS SHOWN IN BRACKETS ARE TO ASTRONOMIC BEARINGS INTEGRATION COORDINATE TABLE

OBSERVED REFERENCE POINTS(ORPS) DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS USING THE PRECISE POINT POSTIONING (PPP) SERVICE, UTM ZONE 18,

NAD83(CSRS)(1997.0) RURAL ACCURACY PER SEC. 14(2) OF O.REG. 216/10 NORTHING (M)

POINT ID ORP A

4923035.41

387357.47

ORP B

4923010.37

387373.17

COORDINATES CANNOT, IN THEMSELVES, BE USED TO RE-ESTABLISH CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTAN?ES. GRID DISTANCES CAN BE CALCULATED BY MULTIPLYING THE GROUND DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAN BY THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF O.99974012. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE GEODETIC AND HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM

GPS OBSERVATIONS USING NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA (NRCAN) POINT POSITIONING (PPP) SERVICE.

/7 /

/ / ,,i

Sl S

PM J6290-0227(l ])

(,.?,:s:, ?q::ol5,+@,,? ,(6:,19'4:5(:,:

Page 153 of 174

‘%""";,:Th(:

s:&? C’-s"i e>’

-,- cl ' ORIGI!S:AL 1,OSITION OF WATER’S ED,GE,

,6?’: -I

‘Jlr

yf,

( , ' ? . , ' , O : I c : ' A “’ o L@‘S)iG” ,fA"N’

i T’

‘y

‘-,A,,-., ,-"

..}X’X /

‘Qr?’ /

i" % S

? ,sz/

S’y

S WE

IWE W?

k /1" ‘?. , ,$.,sbi’ P T . . ?

‘11 (

’e’ iJ

SQ, S

AS SHOWN ON (Pl)

/,Q)

‘y

OF WATER’S EDGE

/ /

/ S

ORIGINAL POSITION

‘y

‘<

? 5’j ,,’

‘S

-A/0 ,,(Q

ANC

S RBR

V bi-

o .s 2 ‘?% ?%, '

7j?

‘5:g9

C:) ’m o

q(COI,":;?,c’o(?’(N’io ulXos2>

‘ifiee

‘y’{

}‘r

S’S.

-J

S ,,af

9,92.

x,,=r.Fs, OECK 6

15.2 (50’) SETBACK

A) . k-

<10(, 0.5B

‘%,‘1

,“b

b? b

,‘i ,6o

FROM WATER’S EDGE

? 5%

S S

bi?

‘k

,“b

bi?

SLT3J ELEV=134.28 18 IN GROUND

SEE PLAN BY DAVID T. HUMPHRIES O.L.S.

DATED OCTOBER 22, 1952 (P1) (ATTACHED TO INST. No. 10120)

jl -5’A-

‘CP

PM J6290-029J(l l)

15.2 (50’) SETBACK

/a%

FROM WA?n:R’S EDGE

?,i

(S <)

111

/’% ki

%’

L-

%./

/’l !}

111

/’% %,/

‘H

’m

A8SOCIATION OF ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS PLAN 8uHMl8810N FORM

14/4,,3

50,

1986197 Page 154 of 174

LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE

/’?-

THl8 PLAN 18 NOT VALID uNLE88 ff $8 AN EMBO88ED OR?GINAL COPY 188UED BY THE 8uFlVEYOfl In aaaordance with

Ragulation 1026, 8eatlon 29(3).

UNPA EN7FD lAND

0 .s 2 - % F,,/ ?

;,aaet<

o (“l o

-J

li

}/%,

’s’(

NOTE &, LEGEND:

15.2 (50’) SETBACK

T3? WE

,‘1. /

CUT CROSS SPIKE WITNESS

CALC

CALCULATED

SET

MEASURED

WATER’S EDGE OVERHEAD SERVICE LINE

HYDRO POLE

111

t l

i’

% ‘11

,‘b

,==..-”’=Q,:.

,oRBR

?-15.2 (50’) SETBACK FROM WATER’S EDGE

D, S

(47 .?3 o A p:5

?€-72?7 ,,15 ;

-p

DIAMETER DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE

BENCHMARK

CENTRELINE

PAINT MARK ON ROCK

PLAN BY DAVID T. HUMPHRIES

O.L.S.

DATED OCTOBER 22, 1952. DAVID T. HUMPHRIES O.L.S.

-,a

.4>

ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE GEODETIC AND HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM

GPS OBSERVATIONS USING NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA (NRCAN) PRECISE POINT POSITIONING (PPP) SERVICE.

?Vo. S

“S’

SYMBOL

S * fis

S’ }k

?’

< vS::c6,

S I

NODE WATER LEVEL MEASURED

/o@G”

CENTRELINE

‘:)

DECIMAL

? , S ,‘k

,-d ‘:)

BENCHMARK

SET ??

l,‘k

673

(s1 3i !?OUN .p? . X

l g’

REBAR

/M!,’ %,‘Hl

-!?,

RBR

l S/

%,/

/a)

ANCHOR

ANC

/) k)

oRBR

IRON PIPE

/ RBR

%./

‘6’

OHSL

ELEV=134.28 18 IN GROUND

IRON BAR

‘1,

“)-?’

up% li //il Oo%M H

?DESCRIPTION

(POINT OF MEASUREMENT)

ON OCT. s, 2016 ELEV=124.3

WE l

WIT

FROM WATER’S EDGE

‘-, 5’s k? ,‘i

SIB

A) . k-

SSIB

-,E D(CK

‘yS

.9’,.

SURVEY MONUMENT PLANTED SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND SHORT STANDARD IRON BAR STANDARD IRON BAR

DENOTES

‘:2A

WE WE

NO PERSON MAY COPY, REPRODUCE, DISTRIBUTE OR ALTER

THIS PLAN IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LESLIE M. H?GGINSON SURVEYING Ltd..

WITH A SEAL”

LESLIE M. HIGGINSON O.L.S. 2016

“THIS 15 NOT AN ORIGINAL COPY UNLESS EMBOSSED

UNPAT[N7FD lAND

DATED OCTOBER 28, 2016

LESLIE M. HIGGINSON SURVEYING Ltd. 1064 GARDINERS ROAD

KINGSTON, ONTARIQ K7P 1R7

(aiii ip6 ?ioaa {gbvSiszo xxrq

trY

loeliii(aln’ihihhinehi’i rars?

Page 155 of 174

LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE

QLA

Ontario Lake Assessments

RR#3 Harrowsmith

& Environmental Fducation Services

Tel: (613) 376-3863 Fax: (613) 376-6128

Ontario KOH IVO

(

Wednesday April 12, 2017 Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street p.o. Box 100

SYDENHAM, Ontario KOH 2T0

REGARDS: Preliminary EIA; Minor Variance - 32 Hickory Lane; Storrington District South Frontenac Township; Loughborough Lake (East Basin) Dear Jennie Kapusta:

A site visit was conducted to the above address on April 5’h, 2017 with a vievv to determine the impacts on Natural Heritage features as a result of the proposal to demolish an existing cottage and replace it with a cottage / residence on an expanded footprint. Site Description:

(

The property is the only parcel on a small island (approx. 0.5 ha; 1.2 ac.) located in the east basin of Loughborough Lake. The island is connected to the mainland by a short 3m (1 0ft) bridge. In addition to the lake, the other Natural Heritage feature of concern is the Loughborough Lake Provincially Sigriificant Wetland (PSW) complex, a small portion of which is located close by; the lacustrine portion of which fronts on the west side of the island near the bridge connection. The water depth along this shoreline area is shallow and the aquatic plant community extends to the surface; the wetland does not encompass the island; water depths along the south shoreline are deeper. The island is ‘dome’ shaped with a central flattened plateau area that is roughly l Om (33ft) above lake level. The north edge of the island shoreline is very steep and drops sharply to the water; there is a top of bank setback requirement of l 5m (50ft) as a result from this shoreline. The balance of the shoreline is not as precipitous but remains challenging. Driveway access is along the west shoreline in close proximity to the water’s edge. The understory has been removed from the plateau area but remains in the foreslope area in the form of jumper bush, gray dogwood and saplings of oak and maple. The mature trees include white pine, oak, maple and white birch that are sparsely distributed over the island. The crowns on several white pine are missing due to wind damage. White cedar is located mainly in the down slope areas close to the water and along the entrance driveway.

An existing cottage (1 50.94m2”; (1624 ft2”) inclusive of the deck is located approximately north-central on the island. At present the cottage is serviced by two in-ground holding tanks located on the west side of the cottage with a pump-out stand pipe located close to the bridge. Water access is on the south shoreline and includes a dock and viewing deck. The existing cottage sits at a distance of l 5m (50’) from the water on the north side and just meets the 30m setback on each of the other sides, however due to the size of the island, there is no location for the proposed new stnicture that can satisfy the 30m setback requirement in every direction. ( ….2

Page 156 of 174

-2-

The Proposal:

The proposal is to demolish the existing cottage and replace it with a new cottage/residence on an expanded

footprint. The proposed new footprint will be 204.9 m2”; (2204 fi2") in area (inclusive of a deck assumed to be the same size as the original’); this results in a 36% increase in footprint. The proposal creates an opportunity to remove the holding tanks and cancel the inherent risks associated with the sewage tnick backing down the steep gradient on Hickoiy Lane to service the frequent pump-outs that are required with holding tanks. This could be achieved by relocating the new building envelope forward (southerly) in front of the existing footprint and then installing a septic tank with a tertiary treatment technology and a filter bed. This can all be achieved with the maximum setback possible on all sides and still more than meet the minimum setback of 1 5m (50’) from the water for the filter bed. Natural Heritage Risks:

A review of the phosphorus data collected in the east basin of Loughborough Lake (2002 to 2015 ) indicates a mean value of 14 ug/L. The upset limit Provincial Water Quality Objective for warm water lakes is 20 ug/L. Loughborough Lake (east basin) is managed as a warm water fishery and does not have an ‘at capacity’ designation. The lacustrine portion the PSW complex located west of the island is approximately 20-25 m from any proposed filter bed location and approximately 30m from the proposed new building envelope. Since there will be no filling, excavating, draining or work in or around the wetland as part of this rebuilding then there will be no impacts on the wetland. Conclusion:

There will be less risk to water quality on the lake with a tertiary treatment system and a filter bed installed than there would be with holding tanks and a sewage tnick access down the steep gradient of Hickory Lane in close proximity to the water. The proposed expanded footprint of the residence will not pose any threat to either water quality in the lake or habitat in the wetland. If you hav7’ any questions in the above regard please feel free to give me a call. 4’

.e B.Sc. Onffirio Lake Assessments

3654 Stage Coach Road RR#3

H?ARROWSMITH, Ontario KOH ?VO

rgem.e@!xplornet.ca 613-376-3863

Copy to: Bill Anglin 2489 Quabbin Road Odessa, Ontario KOH 2H0

Page 157 of 174

Page 158 of 174

“’

[

;:]

‘*

!ffi

‘1”/!i

A/’

S.-

/i li ‘;ia

<J;n’

(

j r l

]

7’!-

(

4,‘4 a"

!4 !li

‘f #

[.#

f .,

41 &

*’

-’<‘ff

a-t’

lJ A

j3 lj

‘! ‘Wa (’ A. r..

,’l

P I

%J l’!

d .tl

?‘q

.’l

ffl’a

L r

‘w

ffiw r

-j

!F’W fi’?i’

Q.’ )7JK

l-*

(

‘4'9

l?i

plP0 r

!)i 5,.- ? M

‘1

;l!.

%’l ? l

! ‘!

;affi ? ’ ?, s :?

!A:.-

‘-’%

,L f

‘:?fi’! e

-M

W>‘A

‘ffl

??.

@,J ?.

f;;4"

!t?Q 7= fc: = =V-

a <J

.fl ;?.

§’?

. ll’ei i’jfffi!al =?ffil N;

1 W

k.:

G5’l.’*?’.J!l

.ii

d-?

p=:] L J

‘ffs

i,’

% w

ffl ri

l19?v?. q

#l4 ?

s: ‘%,

r! P

4ajl p

‘(l!? ?,

rll% j

;

l??

‘:i

P2 W? lj-

l!i

I/’?1? l ll?

r,"

.f :j?

?":-’?’ 1

?a-€

s v " r ??a " ?n l or a??v; i

:r@:?,-,

ri r

(;W

4a,

5i ‘1’%a ,i

‘4r"c’a ? AO3-’,;.Z

7A f ir Wi

? -

,m-.

‘1.

?l!l

t?.

‘&

]

‘..,?; “’!? 1,I’a,.‘y,oa,

]-’

1t? i

,Qa

%’

.., ? l . €.

l ,I?M%, il

N )1

%? % /

‘c.T(’.

.i’% .‘ri ' &

!-/

?y A

l ri

W %..

Page 159 of 174

?’ ??’,,’::.H;:,r%.

** '

m! !i

i’l % ‘%

-p”

‘a/‘i

“3

‘I

df? " i ?4.

P!l

‘,.

f-p,.:1,

k :., &.fi

Qo k l

‘-? s

l ., .iwami?.

,,,:

-91

:’!

‘,%

M, *l

fflf l

J!p,

aN * ?Th

l.J

4’! ?j’

‘%’

?a” ‘?s4.’ %’%,

‘4a l

l!0

.% %

] W l?

I

)

L ) w 1

;.-?

;. .!!fl ‘-::-

f 2.’?.s’z? ;i

A Th

Ilt;

a’

‘1 (

:’.

:’.j%"? :?o Q

€

M???‘o?’

:’:

W4 JJ ll taj-,’. Jfi0

Z ,i

,€f,g

l ‘1

44’

% ?

Q’l

! .’-;l

? .# d 7,J

%:".>i k-

‘!

r?t

t,7

4-.ai b }",-=

‘4

–aU

a J

l 4 k’

?.%?+

]*@z

-‘A’

E’i-:

N !’

€

pe’!!

Pi Pl

vl. r

:ffi’.

I-

?:"-

4A’.i’?

-m:? l

4;,J,

?’

a a Jlk’ %:ss

Ls;D 3 .i

’ ;M ??i ’s’.?.’-

-&y.

l!a

‘}. J

‘11

-‘g

’l

,ff,,Q.

<A =

!-54

1’

M-,’

4;g, . '

:;-’[-’

‘[ *’

I’

41 1

f ‘o-& r’

(

!!!

uba

‘?

T !’

k!’

ffl’

fi’!4

‘€i?.

!’-

f.y4 l-,

q “!l’

=/rA

e!? ‘$7!

<’;4

il sr

h. ‘< ‘a

i,?

L??’ k-a!Jk’%’ ‘W

] =sm p;-

y=?d

‘!n.y . . -

< .1

’ -” W.,l }k’

€

J? ?

‘J’%.-a:? r ?:4 #k4

:?’:"=j,e?

.:M

‘ffftt.:‘J-eF?. a ?

.-’-’%

!-’?aa '

)j?:

#-’

‘%’

4i 1

=i4!:

i? , #

. -,ii-B ‘ff

6?“4- aa-

‘.’,a&

.11

?ka

r?’ 4

[

}

l=l

:,?

‘-l

7 m

‘J

:!q

lit

ffl M

iii k d

I’ll

Page 160 of 174 J

ffi

a’l’

:kl

‘!

,pl!!!l F’

l s

r’

!!>-

?” i-w l

7%, .. ,,44!

,.il

7%’

7’

’l11

‘.J

’l <,?

f’

; / ‘?

r r

-j

n i

F( a

:’,’,J.

}

=:ty

M!l-.d

*?;2?;5,.Qt%7’ P"‘i %

=/’

; -7%l

d’ !

’l

&. <r%. J!

[j=!A

-1";-;

m: l’/. WJ

k? #.

;

,k-t

jf,i

:! Q

.4 r

iiJ):,,w ia flg'0’!:’ -",,,’!

[ff

!l’.?

7 4.

.j,

‘:‘a

*?; rr’ ? ‘j’-

‘1

a’

(

A ‘1,

l!.’

l %L

J m

-? ffl,-t.:

WQ?

j J

1 4

v?A’

!‘4

z,a

.-v4 l

.4? i ? ffi?-;

ffi

Ifl

,,/-

}

?? ?

4,4

‘??ffl

:..A ,

*.,-“m,,

r ll-

ffi

/ A

-4

%.’

, !.,sh?’?J?::J = aYJ

q?&

??: !?? ?,

-”:‘4

-7-ff

,€

-‘Bf

:tl+afflJl

’t’

?y=*€.

.1.

‘za

‘Q

rl ?.’

d’,a

’l

7% al

‘2

affia {.

j*.

l’!

h;j-

‘?u -

-z*

A’

V" ‘?.." ? ffi ‘IT - * it ?1

l& / &

ki d l

“’:‘Jl!l

;l’

f. 7 r

r /

j l! aJ

/) 7

‘/

L’

4?? .-“r—?

‘?

rJ %s1

? ??

pI-A 4% ,’ i’. !

:j.-,s

%’ *.

(

‘R’ :i’ l

14..

Page 161 of 174’V l

Page 162 of 174

a’i?’ a” % ;’

’ Y’. !:y a . ‘Xa’i: ‘? ‘*

4%V ..,;. .j s .1-

%”!

t’

€

.4 ‘jy.

?" %W’:T,,??’ :,j ‘k? } .lk? W

ffi=%i; y

-:,r

?? ‘&:l,ww-

‘%’,.?i;‘A. -’-

‘j’T

lli

?> m ms

23 ,,y’*

‘i-

1 .%l’

*%x y

lo %-

l’

5!-

(

*’- , W4 ;

0-! q

I-3

’l+=

(.i.

‘1

l’ ‘j

‘1

-73 /i’??7??) “a l

m4-

l?i?

k-;:4 H?W -?9’

[’

.> .4’ !a f.aa i?

a%7 a’i

911

r’ l

I l l I

“? ?

’l

N-’-.?

‘z?’ ?’=:76 '

ffi?

‘-< ‘. -W

..-,-=-”:; = =..l ‘. ,a “?-:0+ ? ffi’ W(

’m? i%J

*A L!,! ?:

e s

:sua-a ‘=1

F?l

Gbq:aix n ]-J sr=

../

l l I

l W

l m

14 w

ffi

p”,

$111

ffi

? /

r? w

s f’

l l

-.? ‘i

..6!,l

.a@. a>

<’

‘sa@

:!; 7>:

Page 163 of 174

l i

l ‘ml

‘Th ’l ‘. E!?

‘Aa

llfl

t’

:‘k

l’ *.& ri

5’?:

4 l

-(,

aia'6, “2 -.1)

r e?

‘@} §

;ja.

-l+

<’

i?0

a?lk% -H’ a

-:-t

-#%

?.$

-d.%#’%, 1?

€

%%i

s4 ,-%

?‘R”, 4

k ({

§l

;i..!

“4?’

r r

?‘4,

!-?

i j,

‘J

ffl ffl

l ffl

P%I

*’

ffl

lP?

l r W

rra

i 1

‘ffi

i’l*a- '

% ?

l l

b ?

?il

$ Q

l l r ffi

“16 ve ?.

ffl

eJ W

a!l

% ‘%)14

? %

7 r 1

/ r k l

-ffi s

)

% i

.% A

‘%

s ff

d 1

@”

% t 11

l 11

Page 164 of 174

Page 165 of 174

41 la

X’-

ww?

‘Ql

%Vh.?

;J l

‘fffi,?4-? -4 . QJ

1q.;6.a s.. . '

'

,-‘I,Nll

eN&

.!,.

’ ‘-4& %JJI ? > -

‘?

‘%??: s -!.f

?Mr?

a. ’ ? <” 4”

}: ?.W<i ?j-" i

? ?? 4

l .%‘X, ?"?=a’?‘a’n

!;i!

.,-,s’?’ gl.,. A,W @ ‘J’a’? -’ s H’%??

‘119

k;!!

‘?

‘?i Q

l l

l’l

‘,@@ l aJ}“i ’ : x@R * “i?

‘%’s.

‘ali

J ??

l I

l l l

p 7

7 l I

% I

1 1 1

‘i

Page 166 of 174

Page 167 of 174

t la

?? ‘-.- -l’;

T lm

‘T

SPgA =3;!01

JXX9 ?

P!l: 01

mE]

:’%

J i

O 4

(,IF

% aay

k?”

?-ws l

!F ‘7gi7

!Ja

l(,L?IW

f’ll

W’

[

‘j??p=y%

Ym 4*Toaw4p dhwq /

‘hxui4 ‘?”

5idt4 ‘g(JS,

r;?

I-n

ILI

)

bisswqsb[ rm ‘:C<54 :?%

IM,

[]p

W,,:

.fuq

p,;i4a da OqAl

riTtsl-u

[77711 !I “l(!

ffi

-??

Oi wJ[

JJ’li iM.

‘[]11

€i m

‘Ji

‘/,Ll

[

ffl

7 7>

‘M-

%sJ

iai@13 €.?@( $?

lf’NlllI.

g i

SQ-l’/a4’

ffi

W’

?raist tl

,n ,l

i m w

+-’€

@-m

ffl

? 1

r W

tuB 11 r

‘1

iazs q.9’r

“(fJ’aat

l I

l..! i!

J 7-?

ww?

r’i

Page 168 of 174

art

A,k AQtsi> a > > fl hd) . 114@a- l(-z>” /tl’yG?l 11

r l I

? ? ?

’l!i

?fr

vh *3

J T l

l l

I 1.

lzt;l: Ll’

ffi

i f

]

l ]

-1 s

f 71 M?.-?

‘-7

:41

‘5

3, ThSrr= 44

l [l

2 %tr,,iaiw “k uH Uhhh@(

? 1

?rr

Nll?

Viw?

&ibiux i+ ? cm@ <w4&

11}

Lsbcwt ?slAl!G’!=;

lil

l.;

ww?

“6ut-><c

i=l

? W

] W

111

€

%l l

‘i

j,j

J (’? a ?-=? - ?! ww?

lfl

r”

1-’

m””

. ..?. -. .? .-.? . ?. ? . ? . ?

)

‘Oi

I1]?

t l i g *

[

al? m -m i ?affiah m .- m . ll? - m. m - % ? M M

fflJ7

?’-?‘bo

1.11 wixs

Ijl@ ‘?

l!ffi lllii

‘ra

]

rll? i!!ll

T il

%qhi lal ‘?‘g’h$

(Jl

’l ??

‘?

@?. . ? . ? . ? ? ? ? -

a i

Page 169 of 174

l>6ta* ‘rt,y v<:

pqt’h ss(tw l( ,

(thaytia’l ?=*

’l

,:Msadz <-tsf,, VhgahgE !A/ lx€4 !, la<’€R1AQ,=

? ?

r !#

I7 -1

? af

‘q

/’

O )

‘%%?

‘?

fl t

-l

lli

il d

[1-

iil

a; a

W m

-l

Page 170 of 174

ffi

‘?

Iaa’

‘T q ?

T l

m ’l-

Wtc< &m

AA==rc’h tl(!t’

y,;, li-6sa (li=‘yQ?) m

‘,R,,1,, x((lv

Thc T>mi ‘ma? (hu t%hi ag (v, “$-aat cy A(,5

‘>a(v fibv !4’- ll-aa (ctrta) %JlpF

“&at (AAht4L % k t<h*? G%t T(AD 4bf « UJ!Al?

rbvis ? ’ r”’(- )[1

l ii - - * .s..i ,%iiw i,iii4l1 i .- .- %, r il0*l%,Ql(p,,- ,Ml,!14 llJ’&l..fl .-L 11 l il

lj! L itli r-i l t}j!2 m 141

ffl

m I” r

.—— a a- ’ - " l
-. . ." -l . J .. -.I
A l.. - .J!*i.: !’ s i ?yl’% i Jl!I IP a -

iiii**sr-’

- ‘)–i&Wuj"!!llgffl…wbni% —- ‘-’ -im

!!lH @i!j r; 11

-’%

Ig-l

10– -

*t.

14 ? l

.i.

b111 m

m ffl: l-l

!’

? (

ii l"

$1iw -l

.1.

s 111

’l

$18 m

! //

g L-

-l

‘P.

/-:

?r C I

Page 171 of 174

1’

l-’l l’ ?- ‘–*:? ?–+-l ?

,jl

Page 172 of 174

ltl(t’

?H 5bv !‘I’-s’ (?xii’)

‘/j

ir/

-j

l’ ?

r’

N T it

[lf

nlnl ir

IK: IJ Ir

ffl

ffi

ffl

I 6a

I-

?:I

m *’

Ii’j

“ff %

.’ll

p l

- –Q- ??l-’–?? ?’ ?j '

l - –

-l

“lffl

ffi

‘?

M? = ?

fi W q

l l

Page 173 of 174

l (

/?’-

‘ffi

€ ??

k.?

D?’(,yavg(’?t,, uygoti {<l=ah t,A)

.-’

‘M:.>tl’

Jks”

‘R ?’)

‘J

?> 4qTh ktMV9- ’d Wsp;bw cu’Go rctcH@D

‘==,.

(

@ l:

i’

-’

–’-’ lTh. €

l l

i l

fgiy@

ffi

y 7 l

] / ! ] l l.. . … …. .. - . …-..-i

‘$

t w0

rl l l 1

‘I

-I o’ -=-: -P -= - : a ’ }’ M.i .a-.. =*. – ….I 1- -’— - ' j v ..–..r.1l I
- - - - .€.l

k '

ln’

K,1<b@1,a (yH ‘A’: r-.ya (iiaa*ii’) %A l’(’

! ‘r

Page 174 of 174

11 =’-l .,,,,,a 011 ,a’ # ****i ( ,,,,’ q,,,,ii,i,

l’

‘k

!It W 11

m , jl [l (li l[ . i n LJ

-aa ’l W

l I,

,J .!

:‘1r:

ffla17 Ij ;’

l:il

1L ! ! l

11 1l f

– - 11-Wbluall[l

a” lTh… .W

-’

mffl!!l

1’Z>’-ok

‘-{.

1 l-

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.