Committee Of Adjustment - 12 Dec 2024 - Agenda

Published December 12, 2024

Word Count 14993 words

Reading Time 71 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: December 12, 2024 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2024/Committee Of Adjustment - 12 Dec 2024 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Committee Of Adjustment Meeting Agenda TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Thursday, December 12, 2024 Storrington Centre/Virtual Via Zoom .

Call to Order

Resolution.

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution.

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting will be live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/ Please visit the Virtual Committee of Adjustment Meetings page on the Township website for the link to register to be a participant in this meeting: https://www.southfrontenac.net/our-government/council-andcommittees/committees/committee-of-adjustment/ Instructions about participating via Computer, Laptop, Smartphone, Tablet and Telephone can be found at the above noted link as well.

PowerPoint Presentation Staff has prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that will be displayed on the screen of the meeting, you can also follow along with the PDF version that is in the attachment of this agenda item.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

There are none.

Approval of Minutes – November 14, 2024

Resolution.

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Consent Applications:

Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2024-0120 (MacRae) - Storrington District

3 - 60

61 - 70

71 - 92

Property Address: 2920 Sleeth Lane Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling located within 30m of the

Page 1 of 147

highwater mark of Loughborough Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 153.6sqm. The dwelling will be expanded with two single storey additions, each 42sqm in area, attached to the east and west sides of the dwelling. The area of the proposed dwelling will be 237.6sqm. A new roof is also proposed with will increase the height of the dwelling from 6m to 8.5m as a result of the application.

PL-ZNA-2024-0122 (Vandermeer) (Tarasick) - Bedford District

93 116

Property Address: 99 Sugar Bush Lane, Unit B Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling and attached deck located within 30m of the highwater mark of Bobs Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 166sqm plus a 35.4sqm attached deck. The ground floor area of the proposed two storey dwelling will be 183.3sqm plus a 28.2sqm attached deck and a 8.5sqm attached deck. The gross floor area of the proposed dwelling will be 287.5sqm. The height of the dwelling will be increasing from 6m to 9m. The existing dwelling and attached deck is set back 8.8m from Bobs Lake and the proposed dwelling and attached deck will set back 8.9m the lake

PL-ZNA-2024-0129 (Hutchings) (Stokes) - Loughborough District

117 144

Property Address: 1277 Sheila Lane Purpose & Effect of the Application: The applicant seeks zoning relief to permit the construction of a new seasonal dwelling. The proposed dwelling would consist of a 123.8sqm walkout basement, a 123.8sqm main floor and a 54.6sqm attached deck. Zoning relief is required to permit a 7m setback from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake, a 6m setback from the top of bank, and a 7m setback from the front lot line. The proposal would facilitate the demolition of the existing 92.5sqm seasonal dwelling with attached boathouse, setback 0m from the shoreline.

Other Business

Delegated Authority Report

Adjournment

Resolution.

145 147

Page 2 of 147

Committee of Adjustment Meeting Thursday, December 12, 2024 7:00 p.m. Storrington Centre 3910 Battersea Road, Sunbury, ON and Virtual on Zoom Page 3 of 147

Joining us on Zoom? Your camera won’t be turned on, and your microphone will stay muted unless you ask to speak during a comment period.

Roll Call Committee Members • Alan Revill • Brett Moreland • Doug Morey • Kevin Fox • Mike Howe • Norm Roberts • Randy Ruttan • Steven Pegrum

Staff • Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk/ Secretary-Treasurer • Noah Perron, Planner • Tom Fehr, Planner • Christine Woods, Manager of Planning

Page 4 of 147

Agenda

Page 5 of 147

• Call to Order • Adoption of Agenda • Meeting Information • Declaration of Pecuniary Interests • Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting • Hearings for Applications • Consent Granting Authority Report • Other Business • Adjournment

Format for Each Hearing

Chair introduces application
Planner presents application
Applicant/agent permitted to address Committee
Members of the public permitted to address Committee (maximum 5 minutes per individual)
Staff and/or applicant to provide response to public comments / questions
Questions from Committee members (no comments or debate)
Secretary-Treasurer reads the resolution
Committee discussion and vote Page 6 of 147

After the Meeting • Township staff will contact the applicant following the meeting. Where a decision is made, it will be forwarded to the applicant and anyone who requested to be notified within 15 days. • The applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body as defined by the Planning Act subsection 1(1) may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The appeal must be filed with the SecretaryTreasurer of the Committee of Adjustment within 20 days of the notice of decision. The notice of appeal must set out the reasons for the appeal and be accompanied by the fee required by the Tribunal. Page 7 of 147

• If you have any questions after the meeting, please reach out to staff.

How to Speak to an Application • The Chair of the meeting will open the floor to public comments • On Zoom • Click “Raise Hand” button to request to speak or dial *9 (star nine) when participating by telephone • The Chair will acknowledge you, and the Meeting Host will unmute you • Once you are done speaking or the Committee has no further questions, the Meeting Host will mute your microphone

• In person • Raise your hand and wait for the Chair to acknowledge you • Move to the table and clearly state your name for the record Page 8 of 147

In Case of Technical Difficulties • If a Committee member joining virtually disconnects from the meeting, the meeting will proceed if there is still quorum. The Committee member will attempt to reconnect. • If quorum cannot be met within 15 minutes, the meeting will be postponed. • Staff will be in touch with applicants. • A notice will also be posted on the Township’s social media if the meeting is postponed.

Page 9 of 147

Notice of Collection • Personal information is collected to gather feedback and communicate with interested parties about applications. • This information is collected under the authority of the Planning Act and in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. • With the exception of e-mail addresses and telephone numbers, all information and comments will become part of the public record and will appear on the Township’s website. • Meetings are broadcast live over the internet for the public to view. Your voice will be heard in the broadcast if you speak at the meeting. Broadcasts are archived and continue to be publicly available. Page 10 of 147

• Questions regarding the collection, use and disclosure of this personal information should be directed to the Township Clerk.

Agenda

Page 11 of 147

Minor Variance / Permission Applications

Page 12 of 147

Application PL-ZNA-2024-0120 Permission to Enlarge Legal Non-Conforming Use

Applicant/Owner: Brad MacRae Agent: Terry MacRae/Aimanda Dirksen Property: 2920 Sleeth Lane

Page 13 of 147

Property Description

Page 14 of 147

• 0.21ha lot area • 35m frontage on Loughborough Lake • Accessed from Sleeth Lane • Property slopes gradually down to the water. • Primarily manicured lawn with some mature trees and vegetation along shoreline and side lot lines • Contains dwelling, accessory structures • Rural • RLSW zone

Proposal • Permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal nonconforming dwelling. • Existing single storey dwelling has ground floor area of 153.6sqm • Two proposed additions each 42sqm • Enlarged dwelling to be 237.6sqm • Height increasing from 6m to 8.5m Page 15 of 147

• Additions attached to sides of existing dwelling further from lake than existing development

Page 16 of 147

Page 17 of 147

Page 18 of 147

Page 19 of 147

Page 20 of 147

Page 21 of 147

Rear of dwelling

Septic area

Page 22 of 147

Towards water from dwelling

Towards dwelling from water

Page 23 of 147

Area of east addition

Area of west addition

Page 24 of 147

Shoreline area looking west

Shoreline area looking east

Department, Agency and Public Comments • Cataraqui Conservation – No objection to approval of application. • Building Department – Upgrades to the septic system will be required – this will be reviewed further at the building permit stage. • Public Comments – None received

Page 25 of 147

Planning Analysis

Page 26 of 147

• Footprint of development increasing - Lot coverage increasing from 7.2% to 11% • Additions attached to sides of dwelling and setback further from lake than existing development – complies with side yard setback • Proposed addition located in cleared area – no additional vegetation removal required • Height increase is minimal and no visual impacts anticipated • Conditions recommended related to controlling runoff, vegetation retention/removal, sediment erosion controls.

Recommendation • Approval • Pending any comments received • Subject to conditions • The application is approved in accordance with submitted drawings • Building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property Page 27 of 147

Questions & Comments

Applicant/Agent
Members of the Public
Committee Member questions

Page 28 of 147

PL-ZNA-2024-0120 Committee Deliberation and Vote

Page 29 of 147

Application PL-ZNA-2024-0122 Permission to Enlarge Legal Non-Conforming Use

Applicant/Owner: Vandermeer Wealth Management Agent: Mike Tarasick Property: 99B Sugar Bush Lane

Page 30 of 147

Property Description • 0.66ha lot area • 174m frontage on Bobs Lake • Accessed from Sugar Bush Lane • Large ridge west of dwelling that occupies most of the property. • Primarily treed

Page 31 of 147

• Contains dwelling, accessory structures • Rural • RLSW zone

Proposal • Permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling. • Existing single storey dwelling has ground floor area of 166sqm plus 34.5sqm attached deck • Proposed dwelling has ground floor area of 183.3sqm plus 28.2sqm and 8.5sqm attached decks • Gross floor area increased to 287.5sqm as a result of partial second storey • Height increasing from 6m to 9m • Maintaining setback to lake Page 32 of 147

Page 33 of 147

Page 34 of 147

South Elevation

North Elevation

Page 35 of 147

East Elevation Page 36 of 147

Page 37 of 147

Rear of dwelling

Looking along hydro line

Page 38 of 147

East side of dwelling

West side of dwelling

Page 39 of 147

Towards shoreline

Towards dwelling and shoreline area

Page 40 of 147

Front of dwelling

Shoreline area

Department, Agency and Public Comments • Rideau Valley Conservation Authority – No objection to approval of application. • Building Department – No concerns identified and will review the proposed septic system location in further detail at the building permit stage • Public Comments – None received Page 41 of 147

Planning Analysis

Page 42 of 147

• Footprint of development increasing - Lot coverage increasing from 3.0% to 3.3% • Gross floor area increase resulting from increase in footprint and second storey • Setback of dwelling from lake will be maintained • Proposed dwelling constructed in same location as existing • No visual impacts anticipated from height increase • Conditions recommended related to controlling runoff, vegetation retention/removal, sediment erosion controls.

Questions & Comments

Applicant/Agent
Members of the Public
Committee Member questions

Page 44 of 147

PL-ZNA-2024-0122 Committee Deliberation and Vote

Page 45 of 147

Application PL-ZNA-2024-0129 Minor Variance

Applicant: Lawrence Hutchings Agent: Rod Stokes Property: 1277 Sheila Lane

Page 46 of 147

Background • Original proposal sought to rebuild the cottage and boathouse in their current footprint. Revised proposal only involves the reconstruction of the cottage, setback further from the shoreline.

Page 47 of 147

Property Description • ~1.81Ac with frontage on Sydenham Lake & Carslake Lane • Existing development (red) is concentrated near shoreline. Includes cottage w/ attached boathouse and three detached accessory structures • Only accessible via Sheila Lane • Part of cottage overhangs HWM • Well vegetated • Downward slope towards shoreline • Rural Designation & RLSW Zone Page 48 of 147

Proposal

Page 49 of 147

• Replace existing seasonal (93sqm) cottage with new cottage • Single storey cottage with walkout basement, attached deck & covered porch: • ~185sqm footprint (Cottage: 124sqm; Deck: 55sqm; Porch: 6sqm) • ~248sqm of living space • 7.3m building height • Zoning Relief to permit: • 7m setback from Sydenham Lake • 7m setback from front lot line • 6m setback from top of bank

Existing Site Plan

Proposed Site Plan

Existing Cottage (Rear View)

Existing Cottage (Side View; showing existing septic tank, shoreline slope and vegetation)

Page 50 of 147

Existing cottage relative to the shoreline of Sydenham Lake

Building footprint of the proposed cottage (to the rear of the existing)

Page 51 of 147

Conceptual drawings of the proposed seasonal dwelling (East; North – Facing Lake)

Page 52 of 147

Department, Agency and Public Comments • Cataraqui Conservation – No Objection. CRCA development permit required. • Building Services – No Objection. Existing system is undersized and will require upgrade. To be reviewed further at the building permit stage. • Public Services – Not Circulated (Private Lane) • Public Comment – None Received Page 53 of 147

Planning Analysis Variance meets four tests of a minor variance

Maintains the general intent and purpose of the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan
Maintains the general intent and purpose of Zoning By-law No. 2003-75
Is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question
Is minor Page 54 of 147

Recommendation • Approval • Pending any comments received • Subject to conditions

Page 55 of 147

• The application is approved in accordance with submitted drawings • Development agreements to address runoff, erosion controls, vegetation retention, soil stabilization and naturalization in the area of the existing dwelling following demolition • Setbacks from HWM & TOB confirmed by OLS to be consistent w/ Committee’s Decision • Building Permit is required for all demolition and construction on the property

Questions & Comments

Applicant/Agent
Members of the Public
Committee Member questions

Page 56 of 147

PL-ZNA-2024-0129 Committee Deliberation and Vote

Page 57 of 147

Delegated Consent Authority Report PL-BDJ-2024-0098 (Orser) – Loughborough District • Granted November 14, 2024 • (vacant, unaddressed) Rutledge Road • Create one new rural residential lot • Severed parcel o 1.6 hectares in area o 87m of frontage on Rutledge Road

• Retained lands o 38 hectares in area o 150m frontage on Rutledge Road Page 58 of 147

Delegated Consent Authority Report PL-BDJ-2024-0091 (Lanteigne) – Storrington District • Granted November 20, 2024 • (vacant, unaddressed) O’Neil Lane • Lot Addition to 3990 O’Neil Lane • Severed parcel o 0.67 hectares in area o 129m frontage on O’Neil Lane, 52m frontage on Loughborough Lake o To be conveyed to adjacent lands at 3990 O’Neil Lane, to facilitate construction of addition onto existing dwelling

• Retained lands Page 59 of 147

o 7.3hectares in area o 421m frontage on O’Neil Lane, 470m frontage on Loughborough lake

Adjournment

Page 60 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024

Township of South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Meeting # 10 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Storrington Centre/Virtual Via Zoom Present: Norm Roberts, Steve Pegrum, Randy Ruttan, Alan Revill, Brett Moreland, Kevin Fox, Mike Howe Absent: Doug Morey Staff: Christine Woods, Manager of Planning, Tom Fehr, Planner, Noah Perron, Planner, Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer 1

Call to Order

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution. Resolution No. 2024-10-02 Moved by: Mike Howe Seconded by: Alan Revill THAT the Committee of Adjustment adopts the Agenda for the November 14, 2024 Committee of Adjustment meeting. Carried

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting was live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/

PowerPoint Presentation: Staff prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that was displayed on the screen of the meeting.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

None declared.

Approval of Minutes – October 10, 2024

Resolution. Resolution No. 2024-10-03 Moved by: Steve Pegrum Seconded by: Mike Howe THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves the minutes of the October 10, 2024 Committee of Adjustment meeting. Carried

Page 61 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 6

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Consent Applications:

PL-BDJ-2024-0106 (Grant) (Fotenn) - Portland District Property Address: 5758 Road 38 Purpose & Effect of the Application: The proposal is to sever a new lot from the property, and for the lots to share the existing driveway. The severed parcel would be 1.1 hectares in area with 45 metres frontage on Road 38. The Owner intends to construct a house that contains two additional dwelling units on the new lot. The retained parcel would be 4.9 hectares in area with 36 metres frontage on Road 38. It would contain the existing house and accessory buildings. Christine Woods, Manager of Planning, delivered her report to the Committee for applications PL-BDJ-2024-0106 & PL-ZNA-2024-0107, with a staff recommendation that the Committee approves both applications, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan, Chair of the Committee, inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Tyler Hamilton (Fotenn Planning), agent on the application, stated that he agreed with the contents of the staff report and thanked staff for their work on the application and presentation. Mr. Ruttan inquired, 3 times, as to whether there were any members of the public who wished to comment on the application (none heard). Ms. Woods took the opportunity to address the written public comment from Fraser & Dana Murray that had been received prior to the meeting. Ms. Woods indicated that the Committee cannot address any existing conditions on the property through the consent application process. The application relates to the severed parcel, and it would not be appropriate to require a fence to be installed between the retained lands and an adjacent property. The proposed dwelling units on the severed lands would have a 40 metre buffer from adjacent properties which the municipality feels is an appropriate distance. Ms. Woods also stated that with respect to Additional Dwelling Units, the Official plan has policies that requires them to be designed and located in a way to avoid adverse impacts on the residential character of the property and the surrounding neighborhood. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions regarding the application. Alan Revill, Committee Member, inquired as to what the radius would be for testing wells when the hydrogeological assessment is conducted. Ms. Woods stated that the Township does have a standard for Hydrogeological Assessments related to Additional Dwelling Units, and the study generally requires a 6-hour pump test, the monitoring of neighbouring wells and water quality testing. The study could also be peer-reviewed by a hydrogeologist retained by the municipality. Mr. Revill inquired as to whether it would be up to the hydrogeologist to determine how many neighbouring properties would be tested.

Page 62 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Ms. Woods confirmed that the municipality would let the hydrogeologist determine how many and what wells would need to be monitored as that is their specialty. Mr. Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any further questions from Committee Members. None heard. Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee, read the resolution for conditional approval of the consent application. Mr. Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments form the Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard. Resolution No. 2024-10-04 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves consent application PLBDJ-2024-0106, for property municipally known as 5758 Road 38, to allow for the creation of one new residential lot, being 4.9 hectares in area with 45 metres of frontage on Road 38, subject to conditions. Carried 8 Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable) 9

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2024-0029 (Manson) (Liggett) - Portland District Property Address: 1323 Howes Lake Lane Purpose & Effect of Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming seasonal dwelling within 30m of Howes Lake. The property contains a 60sqm seasonal dwelling with a 16sqm attached deck. The existing one-storey dwelling is 6.1m in height and is setback 11.4m from the highwater mark. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing dwelling and build a new four-season dwelling in the same location. The proposed onestorey dwelling with walkout basement would have a ground floor are of 103sqm, a height of 8.6m and an 11.4m highwater mark setback. A new sewage system would be installed, setback ~21m from the highwater mark. The existing shed requires zoning relief to permit a 27m setback from the highwater mark, and a 1.6m setback from the side lot line. Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Lisa Manson, property owner and applicant, thanked the Committee for considering her application, as it has been a lifelong dream to build a dwelling at her family property. Mr. Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard.

Page 63 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. Mr. Revill requested clarification regarding the location of the accessory building as it relates to the hydro lines on the property. Mr. Perron acknowledged there were numerous constraints on the property, and that tree coverage to the rear of the building makes it difficult to see, but that there is a hydro line to the rear of the accessory building and that Hydro One stipulates a 4.8 metre setback form that hydro line. Mr. Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any further questions from Committee members regarding the application. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard. Resolution No. 2024-10-05 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20240029 for property municipally addressed as 1323 Howes Lake Lane, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Howes Lake, and to permit an accessory structure with deck to establish a 27 metre highwater mark setback and a 1.6 metre side yard setback, subject to conditions. Carried b)

PL-ZNA-2024-0107 (Grant) (Fotenn) - Portland District Property Address: 5758 Road 38 Purpose & Effect of the Application: The proposal is to sever a new lot from the property, and for the lots to share the existing driveway. The severed parcel would be 1.1 hectares in area with 45 metres frontage on Road 38. The Owner intends to construct a house that contains two additional dwelling units on the new lot. The retained parcel would be 4.9 hectares in area with 36 metres frontage on Road 38. It would contain the existing house and accessory buildings. A minor variance is being requested to allow the lots to have less than 76 metres road frontage. ** See minutes for Agenda item 7. a) for details of presentation and discussion.** Chair Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any questions or comments from members of the public regarding the minor variance application (none heard). Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions regarding the minor variance application (none heard). Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for conditional approval of the application, subject to conditions.

Page 64 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Resolution No. 2024-10-06 Moved by: Alan Revill Seconded by: Steve Pegrum THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves minor variance application PL-ZNA-2024-0107 for property municipally addressed as 5758 Road 38, to allow for the creation of one new residential lot to result in reduced road frontage on Road 38, being 45 metres of frontage for the severed lands, and 36 metres of frontage for the retained lands, subject to conditions. Carried c)

PL-ZNA-2024-0110 (Deaves) (Solares) - Loughborough District Property Address: 6438 Bedford Road Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling and attached deck located within 30m of the highwater mark of Deline Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 25sqm. The ground floor area of the proposed two storey dwelling will be 94sqm plus a 16.8sqm covered deck and 5.3sqm covered porch. The gross floor area of the proposed dwelling will be 188sqm plus a walkout basement which is not included in the gross floor area. The overall footprint of dwelling will be increasing from 25sqm to 116.1sqm. The height of the dwelling will be increasing from 4m to 8.1m. The proposed dwelling will maintain the existing 26.2m setback from the highwater mark of Deline Lake. Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Christine Lolley, (Solares Architecture), agent on the application, thanked Mr. Fehr for his presentation and stated that the applicant was agreeable to all of the suggested conditions. She gave a brief summary of her clients’ desire to develop the property and stated she was happy to answer questions. Michael Deaves, property owner, thanked the Chair and the Committee members for considering their application. Mr. Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. Steve Pegrum, Committee Member, stated that he was happy to see that a License Agreement for the use of the municipal Road Allowance was included in the conditions. Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any other comments from Committee members. None heard.

Page 65 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Resolution No. 2024-10-07 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20240110 for property municipally addressed as 6438 Bedford Road, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Deline Lake, subject to conditions. Carried d)

PL-ZNA-2024-0117 (Featherston) - Storrington District Property Address: 2498 Sands Road Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling within 30m of Cedar Lake. Existing development consists of a dwelling with attached deck. The applicant proposes to demolish the ~50sqm rear component of the dwelling in favour of a larger addition in the same area. The proposed addition would be 59sqm in area, 6.5m in height, and would maintain the same highwater mark (23m) and top of bank (11m) setback as the existing. The applicant is also proposing to construct a 10sqm raised entrance deck, setback more than 30m from the highwater mark and 15m from the top of bank. The proposed addition would increase total ground floor area from ~150sqm to 169sqm and total gross floor area from 152sqm to 161sqm. Building height of the proposed addition would match the portion of the dwelling that will remain (6.5m). Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Amanda D’Amour, applicant and property owner, thanked the Committee for hearing the application and thanked Mr. Perron for all of his hard work and assistance. Mr. Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. Barry Horn, speaking on behalf of a neighbouring property owner, was participating via Zoom, and it was very difficult for Staff and Committee members to hear exactly what he was stating. Staff interpreted that he was expressed concern over the front porch/deck area, which Mr. Horn believes was re-built larger than what was existing and without approvals. Mr. Perron clarified that the application being presented to the Committee was for an addition to the rear of the dwelling and does not involve the deck in question. Mr. Perron advised Mr. Horn that if he had concerns about the construction of the deck, the appropriate course of action is to fill out a BWP investigation form on the Township’s website. Mr. Horn responded and clarified that his concern was for the front deck and that he had no concerns with the proposed addition to the rear of the dwelling.

Page 66 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Mr. Ruttan inquired (2 more times) as to whether there were any further comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard. Resolution No. 2024-10-08 Moved by: Mike Howe Seconded by: Alan Revill THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20240117, for property municipally addressed as 2498 Sands Road, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Cedar Lake, subject to conditions. Carried e)

PL-ZNA-2024-0118 (Benson) - Portland District Subject Property Address: 3253 Harrowsmith Road Purpose & Effect of the Application: The Owner proposes to construct a 55.7sqm addition onto an existing 111.4sqm detached garage. A minor variance is being requested as the lot coverage of accessory buildings on the property exceeds the lot coverage of the existing principal building (single detached dwelling). The area of the single detached dwelling and attached deck is 142.2sq and the total area of all accessory buildings is proposed to be 233.7sqm. Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Todd Benson, property owner, thanked the Chair and the Committee members for considering his application. Mr. Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard.

Page 67 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 Resolution No. 2024-10-09 Moved by: Brett Moreland Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves minor variance application PL-ZNA-2024-0118, for property municipally addressed as 3253 Harrowsmith Road, to permit a 55.7 square metre addition onto the existing 111.4 square metre detached garage, allowing for the lot coverage of accessory structures on the property to exceed the lot coverage of the principal structure, subject to conditions. Carried f)

PL-ZNA-2024-0119 (Sytsma) - Storrington District Property Address: 4006 O’Neill Lane Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming accessory structure within 30m of Loughborough Lake. The property contains a 74.2sqm garage, with a building height of 4.2m, setback approximately 15.8m from the highwater mark. The applicant proposes to construct an addition to the existing garage. The proposed addition would have an area of 34.1sqm, a building height of 3.2m and would be setback approximately 23m from the highwater mark. The proposal would facilitate the removal of a detached lean-too structure existing beside the garage. Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Al Sytsma, property owner, thanked the Committee for hearing his application and thanked Mr. Perron for all of his help with the application process. Mr. Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard. Resolution No. 2024-10-10 Moved by: Alan Revill Seconded by: Mike Howe THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20240119, for property on O’Neill Lane, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming accessory structure within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake, subject to conditions. Carried

Page 68 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 g)

PL-ZNA-2024-0121 (Parker) (Myers) - Bedford District Property Address: 191 Burns Lane North Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling located within 30m of the highwater mark of Bobs Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 121.3sqm. The dwelling will be expanded with a 34.3sqm single storey addition attached to the rear of the dwelling. The area of the proposed dwelling will be 155.6sqm. The height of the dwelling will not be increasing as a result of the application. Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Randy Ruttan inquired as to whether the applicant or their agent wished to address the Committee. Tyson Myers, agent on the application, thanked the Committee and staff for their time and stated that he was available to answer any questions that may arise. Mr. Ruttan inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any comments or questions from members of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan asked Committee members if they had any questions for staff or the applicant. None heard. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Mr. Ruttan asked if there were any comments from Committee members regarding the resolution. None heard. Resolution No. 2024-10-11 Moved by: Brett Moreland Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20240121, for property municipally addressed as 191 Burn Lane North, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Bobs Lake, subject to conditions. Carried

Other Business

Delegated Authority Report Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer, delivered her Report to the Committee.

Adjournment

Resolution. Resolution No. 2024-10-12 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts

Page 69 of 147

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment November, 14, 2024 THAT the November 14, 2024 Committee of Adjustment meeting for the Township of South Frontenac is hereby adjourned at 8:15 pm to reconvene on Thursday, December 12, 2024 at 7:00pm or at the call of the Chair. Carried

Randy Ruttan, Chair

Page 70 of 147

Page 71 of 147

Page 72 of 147

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

File No: PL-ZNA-2024-0120___

Date Received: October 24, 2024______ Pre-Consultation for this application &fYes Planner: 1.

T<JtY:::\

r e,h,

Name ofOwner(s):

□ No

Date of pre-consultation: Oc.A. to

2.o L l.\

Brc�c\ \Q.{ ffictc..Ro,,e

Full Mailing Address ofOwner(s):

2.. C\ ‘2.0 S \ ec---b "“o. r,e

l3<’.’-·t4-er-s ee,‘Phone number ofOwner(s): Email Address ofOwner(s): 2.

If the applicant is NOT the owner of the subject land, the written authorization of the owner that the applicant is authorized to make the application, must accompany the application. Name of Authorized Agent:

Te_n: J M a.tQqe or A-i JYI CL�ol,._ DI r [ SQ,,,–.

Full Mailing Address of Authorized Agent:

.…, r,k,J> rj yYt\e

Pu¼ eoc0 ,o�

Phone number of Authorized Agent: Email Address of Authorized Agent: Agent as named above is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the owners for purposes of processing this application for Minor Variance.

The description of the subject land: District:

O Bedf ord

D Portland

□ Loughborough

�Storrington

Concession Number: ,_,,___ Lot Number: ——–Street Number:

2.. C\ 2.0

Name of Road/Street:

S \ee:th h C\ n e

Reference Plan Number: L_2·?S�—— Part Number(s): _________ Roll Number:

Q bO ,, 05 o- \ Cf 20() ., coco

3 Page 73 of 147

Page 74 of 147

Page 75 of 147

Page 76 of 147

Page 77 of 147

Page 78 of 147

Page 79 of 147

Page 80 of 147

Page 81 of 147

Page 82 of 147

Page 83 of 147

Page 84 of 147

Page 85 of 147

Page 86 of 147

December 4, 2024

File: MV/FRS/277/2024

Sent by E-mail Mr. Tom Fehr, Planner Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario K0H 2T0 Dear Mr. Fehr: Re:

Application for S. 45(2) Permission PL-ZNA-2024-0120 (MacRae) 2920 Sleeth Lane, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Loughborough Lake (East Basin)

Cataraqui Conservation staff have reviewed the above-noted application for permission and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment. Proposal The proposal involves the expansion of a single detached dwelling on the subject property, which is currently set back approximately 14.3 m from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake (east basin). Two single storey dwelling additions are proposed on the east and west sides of the current dwelling and the roof will be reconstructed with an increase in height. The existing dwelling is 153.6 sq. m. and the additions will increase it to 237.6 sq. m. Discussion Cataraqui Conservation’s scope of review for this proposal includes the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake. Natural Hazards / Ontario Regulation 41/24 Cataraqui Conservation, in accordance with the 2024 Provincial Planning Statement, Township Official Plan and Ontario Regulation 41/24, directs development away from hazardous lands, such as flood and erosion-prone lands. Flooding: The maximum recorded water level for Loughborough Lake is 125.1 metres geodetic. For Loughborough Lake, the maximum recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered flood plain. Cataraqui Conservation’s Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation 41/24 (see description below) requires that all development be set back a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory floodplain of a waterbody. Based on our review of topographic mapping, the flooding hazard extends part way up the shoreline slope. At present, the dwelling is elevated above the flooding hazard and set back approximately 10 metres at the closest point. The proposed dwelling additions will be approximately 11.5 metres from the flood line and therefore compliant with CRCA setback requirements for flooding. It’s our understanding the dwelling additions will be single storey above-grade additions. Accordingly, the additions would also meet vertical flood protection requirements.

Page 87 of 147

Erosion: The shoreline of Loughborough Lake, like any waterbody, is subject to long-term erosion and potential slope instability. Based on a conservative estimate, the shoreline at this site consists of an approximately 2 metre high till slope. Cataraqui Conservation, in accordance with provincial technical standards, defines the extent of potential erosion hazards for these type of shorelines to include an allowance for toe erosion (estimated as 4 m), a stable slope allowance of 3(h):1(v), plus an access allowance of 6 metres. The combination of these allowance results in an estimated erosion hazard limit of 16 metres. This is measured from the toe of the shoreline slope inland. CRCA regulatory policies restrict new development within the erosion hazard limit. Based on our review, the proposed additions would be approximately 19 metres from the toe of slope along the shoreline. Accordingly, the additions are outside the erosion hazard. Overall, staff have no concerns from a natural hazards perspective. If approved, staff recommend that proper sediment and erosion controls be incorporated into construction plans. We also recommend the maintenance and enhancement of a healthy buffer of native vegetation between all buildings/structures and the water, to help stabilize soils in the long-term and to create a resilient shoreline. Runoff from the new roof and other hardened surfaces should also be directed away from the shoreline to a naturally vegetated location where infiltration can occur. Recommendation Staff have no objection to the approval of application PL-ZNA-2024-0120 based on our review of natural hazards and regulatory policies. We also recommend implementation of the above-noted best practice measures (in bold text) and advise the applicant that a CRCA permit will be required at the building permit stage. Ontario Regulation 41/24 Please note that portions of the subject lands are subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits (formerly O. Reg. 148/06), which is administered by the CRCA. For this property, any development (buildings and structures) and site alteration (excavation, grading, placement of fill) within 15 metres of the flood plain and within 30 metres of the toe of slope is subject to O. Reg. 41/24. Therefore, a CRCA permit will be required for the development. The landowner(s) should contact CRCA’s office at the building permit stage for more information about permitting requirements under O. Reg. 41/24. Please inform this office of any decision made by the Committee with regard to this application. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 228, or by email at mdakin@crca.ca. Yours truly,

Michael Dakin, RPP, MCIP Supervisor, Development Review

Page 2 of 2

Page 88 of 147

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Report Date:

December 12, 2024

Subject:

Permission Application (S. 45(2) of Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2024-0120, Brad MacRae (Terry MacRae/Aimanda Dirksen), 2920 Sleeth Lane, Storrington District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of this application for permission to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, subject to conditions. Background Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: RLSW Proposal The applicant seeks to request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling located within 30m of the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 153.6sqm. The dwelling will be expanded with two single storey additions, each 42sqm in area, attached to the east and west sides of the dwelling. The area of the enlarged and renovated dwelling will be 237.6sqm. A new roof is also proposed which will increase the height of the dwelling from 6m to 8.5m. Related Applications The property was previously subject to minor variance application MV-25-12-S, which approved the removal of a portion of the front side of the dwelling and constructing an addition of equal size onto the west side of the dwelling. The decision did not specify the size of addition that was approved. The application also approved an increase in height of 1.2m. The owner has not proceed with any construction related to this minor variance application. Property Description The subject property is 0.21ha in area with 35m of frontage on Loughborough Lake and is accessed from Sleeth Lane. The property contains an existing dwelling, a boat house and several accessory structures The property slopes gradually down from the rear of the www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 89 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0120

property towards the water. The property is primarily manicured lawn with some mature tree cover along the side lot lines and along the shoreline. The property is located in an area of similar waterfront residential development. Department and Agency Comments Cataraqui Conservation has advised they have no objection to approval of the application. They recommend the incorporation of sediment and erosion controls into construction plans. They also recommend the maintenance and enhancement of a healthy buffer of native vegetation between all buildings/structures and the water, to help stabilize soils in the long-term and to create a resilient shoreline. Runoff from the new roof and other hardened surfaces should also be directed away from the shoreline to a naturally vegetated location where infiltration can occur. The application was not circulated to Public Services due to the nature of the application. Building Services advised that upgrades to the septic system will be required and noted that this will be reviewed further at the building permit stage. Public Comments No comments were received from the public at the time this report was written. Planning Analysis The Township Official Plan Schedule designates the subject property as Rural and the property is zoned RLSW in Zoning By-law No. 2003-75. The dwelling is a permitted use. Section 5.10.2 of the Zoning By-law states that existing buildings with less than the minimum 30 metre setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody may be repaired, renovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. This provision prohibits the enlargement of these existing buildings, without seeking permission from the Committee of Adjustment. The existing dwelling is a legal non-conforming building because it was constructed prior to the current Zoning By-law and is setback 13.7 metres from the highwater mark. Through its powers under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, the Committee of Adjustment may grant permission to enlarge the dwelling. The criteria for considering an application under Section 45(2) are:

Whether the application is desirable for appropriate development of the subject property; and

Whether the application will result in undue adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and neighbourhood.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 90 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0120

The proposed additions are located on the sides of the existing dwelling. The west addition is set back 18.6m from the lake and the east addition is set back 18m from the water. As the additions are attached to the sides of the existing dwelling, they are set back further from the water than the existing closet point of development. The location of the additions minimizes the amount of site disturbance and the amount of vegetation removal that would be required as they are located in an already cleared area. The proposed additions result in lot coverage being increased from 7.2% to 11% for the primary dwelling. The increase in lot coverage is a function of the small size of the existing lot, rather than a result of the proposed enlargements. The enlarged dwelling is comparable in size to other dwellings on Sleeth lane. The increase in lot coverage will not impact the functionality of the property as the area of the septic system and the driveway and parking areas are not being affected as a result of the expansion. The setback to the water is not being reduced and the recommended conditions will direct any increased roof runoff away from the like and require the maintenance of mature vegetation. The RLSW zone requires a 3m setback from the interior lot lines. The additions will comply with these setbacks as the east addition will be set back 4.5m from the lot line and the west addition will be set back 7.1m from the lot line. The existing dwelling is a one storey structure and the proposed additions will also be one storey. A new roof is proposed for the dwelling that will increase the height from 6m to 8.5m. There are mature trees along the shoreline and along the side property lines. Maintaining existing vegetation along the shoreline will assist in screening the development from the water and adjacent properties. The proposed additions and roof height increase will not result in any negative visual impacts. Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that it is appropriate for the Committee of Adjustment to grant permission to expand the legal non-conforming dwelling on the property, as described in this report. Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 91 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0120

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve application PL-ZNA-2024-0120 for 2920 Sleeth Lane, subject to the following conditions.

Permission is granted to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling on the subject property. The enlarged dwelling is permitted to be 238sqm. The expanded dwelling is permitted to have a maximum building height of 8.5m. The location of the additions are to be consistent with the submitted plans that will be attached to the Decision as Schedule “A”.
The Owner is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the following matters and environmental standards of the Township: a. Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g. silt fence, straw bales) must be used during construction and until the site is stable and revegetated. b. Roof runoff will be directed away from the lake and discharged to natural or constructed leaching pits/areas to maximize infiltration or onto coarse rock rubble splash pads to reduce the velocity of runoff. c. That existing natural vegetation within 30 metres of the shoreline must be maintained.
A building permit is required for ALL proposed demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac. Report Prepared By: Tom Fehr, RPP MCIP, Planner Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, RPP MCIP, Manager of Planning

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 92 of 147

Page 93 of 147

Page 94 of 147

Page 95 of 147

Page 96 of 147

Page 97 of 147

Page 98 of 147

Page 99 of 147

Page 100 of 147

Page 101 of 147

Page 102 of 147

Page 103 of 147

Page 104 of 147

Page 105 of 147

[29 ‘] 8.8

² ² ² ²

² ² ²

² ² ² 12 .0 [3 3”]

9’-

[ 5.2

5"]

5’-

60 ‘-5 1

5 8"

‘-8

38 SURVEYING MAPPING GIS

62 STEACIE DRIVE, SUITE 103, KANATA, ON K2K 2A9 T: (613) 731-7244 F: (613) 254-8659 www.jdbarnes.com

3 4"

‘-3

1 " 1 4

‘15

99B SUGAR BUSH LANE - COTTAGE

EXISTING CONDITIONS Page 106 of 147

A001

29'4"] 8.9 [

2’-6 “] 9 [4

5 [4 To Fire 1’-1”] pla ce

² ² ²

² ²

² 12 .6 [4 1’-

6"]

² ²

[3 3"]

9’-

[ 2.5

6"]

6’-

SURVEYING MAPPING GIS

62 STEACIE DRIVE, SUITE 103, KANATA, ON K2K 2A9 T: (613) 731-7244 F: (613) 254-8659 www.jdbarnes.com

99B SUGAR BUSH LANE - COTTAGE

PROPOSED CONDITIONS Page 107 of 147

A002

Page 108 of 147

Page 109 of 147

December 5, 2024 24-SFR-MVA-0039 Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac 4432 George St. Box 100 Sydenham ON K0H 2T0

Attention:

Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer

Subject:

Application for Minor Variance PL-ZNA-2024-0122 Brent & Lisa Vandermeer 99 B Sugar Bush Lane, South Frontenac ARN 1029 0100 5032 0000 0000

Dear Ms. Kaestner, The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority has received the above noted application and have reviewed it within the context of: • • •

Section 5.2 Natural Hazards of the Provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of the Planning Act; Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act; The Mississippi-Rideau Source Water Protection Plan;

The Proposal Based on the circulated materials, RVCA understands this application requests permission to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling and attached deck located within the 30 m highwater mark of Bob’s Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 166 m2, and a 35 m2 deck which will be demolished. The proposed two-storey replacement dwelling will be increasing the height from 6

Page 110 of 147

m to 9 m, and will have a ground floor area of 183 m2, with two attached decks with proposed areas of 28 m2 and 8 m2. The existing dwelling and attached deck is currently set back 8.8 m from Bob’s Lake, and the proposed replacement dwelling and attached decks will be set back 8.9 m from Bob’s Lake. The replacement dwelling will not be built within the exact existing footprint. The Property The subject lands are described as Part Lot 29 Concession 7 Bedford, municipally known as 99 B Sugar Bush Lane in the Township of South Frontenac. The lands are approximately 0.66 ha (1.64 acres) in area, with approximately 45 m of road frontage and 572 m of water frontage on Bob’s Lake. The lands are presently developed with an existing dwelling, accessory boathouse, and private servicing. A review of our records and mapping indicate the following: • Bobs Lake, which is considered to be a watercourse under our regulation, has a regulated flood level of 163.07 m above sea level • This area overlies a highly vulnerable aquifer under the Mississippi-Rideau Source Water Protection Plan • There are no identified Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSWs) on the lands • Some steep slopes are present on the property It is our understanding that the development envelope of these lands is constrained by natural boundaries (stone/rock formations), and various required setbacks to the water, adjacent properties, and overhead power lines. Provincial Policy Statement Regarding Section 5.2 Natural Hazards within the PPS, our office has no concerns with the requested minor variance as there are no regulated natural hazards identified on the subject lands. Ontario Regulation 41/24 The proposed minor variance request does not appear to impact any identified regulated natural hazards. Any development activity and/or site alteration proposed within RVCA’s regulated area (within 15 metres of a watercourse/waterbody) will require a permit from our office in accordance with Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits. Source Water Protection The subject property is identified as overlying a highly vulnerable aquifer. These are aquifers that are vulnerable to surface contaminants due to thin or absent soils overlying bedrock that may be fractured. Where these conditions exist, it may be possible for contaminants to enter drinking groundwater supplies. For this reason, care should be taken to avoid land uses and practices that

Page 111 of 147

Page 2 of 3

may inadvertently lead to undesirable effects on groundwater. Some best practices that could be considered include: • • • • •

increased well casing depths, increased distance of septic systems from drinking water wells, ensuring septic systems are located downgradient of wells, ensuring that wells and septic systems are properly maintained, avoiding the use of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers.

Conclusion In conclusion, our office has no objections to the requested minor variance. Our office appreciates that the applicant is increasing the water setback despite the constraints. Our office notes that the existing dwelling, and the replacement dwelling, are situated adjacent to a stone/rock formation with some steep slopes. This appears to be unavoidable due to the lands topography and other constraints. While our office does not believe there are any active erosion risks here due to the presence of the stone/rock formation, we do provide the following best management practices for consideration should this application be approved: •

Roof runoff shall be collected and directed on-site and away from slopes, into natural or constructed leaching pits and/or rain barrels to provide the greatest infiltration of surface runoff. Runoff should not outlet directly towards the lake. Other Low Impact Development (LID) techniques should be used to deal with runoff from the hardened building surfaces (roofs, walkways, deck, driveways, etc).

Please advise us on the Committee’s decision respecting this application, or any changes in the status of the application. Best regards,

Dan Nguyen Planner, RVCA cc -Brent & Lisa Vandermeer, owner cc -Tarasick Carpentry c/o Mike Tarasick, agent cc -Tom Fehr, Planner Township of South Frontenac

Page 112 of 147

Page 3 of 3

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Report Date:

December 12, 2024

Subject:

Permission Application (S. 45(2) of Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2024-0122, Vandermeer Wealth Mgmt. (Mike Tarasick), 99B Sugar Bush Lane, Bedford District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of this application for permission to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, subject to conditions. Background Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: RLSW Proposal The applicant seeks to request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling and attached deck located within 30m of the highwater mark of Bobs Lake. The existing single storey dwelling has a ground floor area of 166sqm plus a 35.4sqm attached deck. The ground floor area of the proposed two storey dwelling will be 183.3sqm plus a 28.2sqm attached deck and another 8.5sqm attached deck. The gross floor area of the proposed dwelling will be 287.5sqm. The height of the dwelling will be increasing from 6m to 9m. The existing dwelling and attached deck is set back 8.8m from Bobs Lake and the proposed dwelling and attached deck will set back 8.9m the lake. Related Applications The lands are not subject to any additional applications under the Planning Act. Property Description The subject property is approximately 0.66ha in area with approximately 174m of frontage on Bobs Lake. The property is accessed from Sugar Bush Lane which is a private lane. The property contains an existing dwelling and a boathouse. The existing dwelling is located between the south property line and a rock cliff that rises sharply up approximately 10m. The cliff is the south side of a hill that occupies most of the property. The existing dwelling www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 113 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0122

is located in the only level area on the property. The property is primarily treed and is located in an area of similar waterfront residential development. Department and Agency Comments Comments have not been received from RVCA at the time of writing this report. The application was not circulated to Public Services due to the nature of the application. Building Services did not identify any concerns and will review the proposed septic system location in further detail at the building permit stage. Public Comments No comments were received from the public at the time this report was written. Planning Analysis The Township Official Plan Schedule designates the subject property as Rural and the property is zoned RW in Zoning By-law No. 2003-75. The dwelling is a permitted use. Section 5.10.2 of the Zoning By-law states that existing buildings with less than the minimum 30 metre setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody may be repaired, renovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. This provision prohibits the enlargement of these existing buildings, without seeking permission from the Committee of Adjustment. The existing dwelling is a legal non-conforming building because it was constructed prior to the current Zoning By-law and is setback 8.8 metres from the highwater mark. The 30m setback from the highwater mark runs through the existing and proposed dwellings. Through its powers under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, the Committee of Adjustment may grant permission to enlarge the dwelling. The criteria for considering an application under Section 45(2) are:

Whether the application is desirable for appropriate development of the subject property; and

Whether the application will result in undue adverse impacts on the surrounding properties and neighbourhood.

The proposed dwelling will maintain the same setback from the water as the existing dwelling. Due to the topography of the property the building is located in the only practical area for development and minimizes the amount of site disturbance and the amount of vegetation removal that would be required. The proposed dwelling will increase the footprint of the development from 201sqm to 220sqm. This results in lot coverage being slightly increased from 3% to 3.3% for the primary building. www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 114 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0122

The existing dwelling is a one storey structure. The expanded dwelling will include a partial second storey. The building height will slightly increase from 6 metres to 9 metres as a result of the partial second storey. This is within the maximum permitted height of the RLSW zone. The increase in height should not result in any negative visual impacts as the height and massing of the proposed dwelling is typical for waterfront development in the area. The treed slopes that surround the dwelling and maintaining existing vegetation along the shoreline will assist in screening the development from the water and adjacent properties. Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that it is appropriate for the Committee of Adjustment to grant permission to expand the legal non-conforming dwelling on the property, as described in this report. Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve application PL-ZNA-2024-0121 for 99B Sugar Bush Lane, subject to the following conditions.

Permission is granted to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling on the subject property. The replacement dwelling is permitted to have a 184 square metre ground floor area plus a 29 square metre attached deck and a 9 square metre attached deck. The gross floor area is permitted to be 288square metres. The replacement dwelling is permitted to have a maximum building height of 9 metres. It must maintain the highwater mark setback of the existing dwelling. The location and design of the replacement dwelling and attached deck are to be consistent with the submitted plans that will be attached to the Decision as Schedule “A”.
The Owner is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the following matters and environmental standards of the Township: a. Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g. silt fence, straw bales) must be used during construction and until the site is stable and revegetated. www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 115 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0122

b. Roof runoff will be directed away from the lake and discharged to natural or constructed leaching pits/areas to maximize infiltration or onto coarse rock rubble splash pads to reduce the velocity of runoff. c. That existing natural vegetation within 30 metres of the shoreline must be maintained except in the immediate area of the building. 3. The owner is required to have the location of the existing dwelling confirmed by an Ontario Land Surveyor prior to demolition. The location of the replacement dwelling is to be pinned and its setback from the highwater mark of Bobs Lake confirmed through the submission a letter of verification by an Ontario Land Surveyor to be compliant with the Committee’s decision, prior to the construction of the footings occurring and to the satisfaction of the Township’s Chief Building Official or their designate. 4. A building permit is required for ALL proposed demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac. Report Prepared By: Tom Fehr, RPP MCIP, Planner Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, RPP MCIP, Manger of Planning

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 116 of 147

Page 117 of 147

Page 118 of 147

Page 119 of 147

Page 120 of 147

Page 121 of 147

Page 122 of 147

Page 123 of 147

Page 124 of 147

Page 125 of 147

Page 126 of 147

Page 127 of 147

Page 128 of 147

Page 129 of 147

Page 130 of 147

Page 131 of 147

Page 132 of 147

Page 133 of 147

Page 134 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Building Services 4432 George Street, Box 100 Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 613-376-3027 www.southfrontenac.net

Sewage System Review Comments To:

Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac 4432 George St, Box 100 Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0

Application Number:

PLZNA20240129

Type of Application or Proposal:

Planning Sewage Review - Minor Variance

Applicant: (if applicable) Agent:

Location:

Comments:

HUTCHINGS LAWRENCE GRAHAM ROD STOKES

102904003004500 1277 SHEILA LANE CON 5 PT LOT 7 RP 13R14724;PARTS 1 & 2

The existing 45 year old sewage system is undersized for the proposed development. At a minimum, the applicants will need to apply for and obtain a permit to install a new septic tank. The licenced installer may also determine that the existing leaching bed must be replaced as well.

Building Inspector: Matthew Doyle Date:

November 27, 2024

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community

Page 135 of 147

December 9, 2024

File: MV/FRS/291/2024

Sent by E-mail Mr. Noah Perron, Planner Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario K0H 2T0 Dear Mr. Perron: Re:

Application for Minor Variance PL-ZNA- 2024-0129 Pt Lot 7, Concession 5, Parts 1&2 Plan 13R14724; 1277 Sheila Lane Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Sydenham Lake

Cataraqui Conservation staff have reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration based on our role as commenting agency responsible for natural hazards on Planning Act applications, and as administrator of Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits. Proposal The proposed development involves the demolition of the existing 92.5 sqm seasonal dwelling with an attached boathouse and the construction of a new 123.8 sqm seasonal dwelling. The existing dwelling is setback 0 m from the water and the proposed new dwelling will be setback 7 m from the highwater mark and 6 m from the top of bank. The existing septic system, decks, and bunkie are proposed to remain. We understand the existing boathouse will be reconstructed. The existing storage structures are proposed to be removed. Site Description The subject lands are located along the southern shore of Sydenham Lake in South Frontenac Township. Access to the property is provided from Sheila Lane which connects to a parking area at the northeast portion of the property. The shoreline is steep and the property rises more gradually towards the south. The rear of the property is densely covered in mature trees and vegetation growth. The subject lands are developed with an existing seasonal dwelling with an attached boathouse, bunkie, septic system and storage structures. Discussion Cataraqui Conservation’s scope of review for this proposal includes the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the Shoreline of Sydenham Lake. Natural Hazards / Ontario Regulation 41/24

Page 136 of 147

Page 2 of 3 Flooding: The regulatory (1:100 year) floodplain of Sydenham Lake is defined as an elevation of 131.6 m GSC. Cataraqui Conservation’s Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation 148/06 (now O. Reg. 41/24) require that all new development be set back a minimum of 6 m from the regulatory floodplain of a waterbody. Based on our review, the flooding hazard follows the shoreline slope and does not extend beyond the top of bank. The existing dwelling is setback 0 m from the flood hazard and is not compliant with CRCA setback requirements for flooding. The proposed replacement dwelling is set back 6 m from the top of bank and, accordingly, will be located outside of the area subject to potential flood risk and the required 6 m setback. The existing septic system, which is proposed to be maintained and improved, is set back 51 m from the shoreline and is outside of the area subject to potential flood risk. The boathouse is proposed to be reconstructed and will maintain a 0 m setback from the floodline. CRCA policies and guidelines can permit boathouses within the flood hazard provided the boathouse maintains an appropriately sized wet slip, does not contain habitable living space, and is limited to one-storey in height. Cataraqui Conservation will need to review design details for the new boathouse as part of the O. Reg. 41/24 permit review (see discussion below). Erosion: The subject lands consist of a series of slopes rising from the shoreline up towards the rear of the lot. Since development is proposed near the lower slope, the focus of our review with regards to stability and erosion is in this area. The lower shoreline slope is approximately 2 metre high and consists of stable bedrock. In this situation, CRCA’s regulatory policies require new buildings and structures to be set back 6 m from the stable top of bank. The proposed dwelling is set back 6 m from the top of bank and as such, staff are satisfied with the proposal from an erosion hazard perspective. To ensure long-term erosion avoidance and slope stability, staff recommend the maintenance and enhancement of a healthy buffer of native vegetation between buildings/structures and the water, to help stabilize soils into the long-term. Runoff from buildings and structures and other hardened surfaces should also be directed away from the shoreline to a naturally vegetated location where infiltration can occur. Recommendation Cataraqui Conservation staff have no objection to the approval of application PLZNA 2024-0129 based on our consideration for natural hazard and regulatory policies. Staff recommend implementation of the above-noted best practice measures (in bold text) and advise the applicant that if the proposed development is approved, Cataraqui Conservation permit approval will be required.

Cataraqui Conservation 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca

Page 137 of 147

Page 3 of 3 Ontario Regulation 41/24 Please note that portions of the subject lands are subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by the CRCA. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e.g. development and site alteration) to a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as flooding and erosion, and that the changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. If approved, construction of the new dwelling, attached deck and boathouse reconstruction will require Cataraqui Conservation permit approval. The landowner(s) should contact Cataraqui Conservation’s office at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under O. Reg. 41/24. Please inform this office of any decision made by the Committee with regard to these applications. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 239, or by e-mail at estucke@crca.ca

Sincerely,

Emma Stucke, MCIP, RPP Resource Planner Cc: Lawrence Hutchings & Rod Stokes, via email

Cataraqui Conservation 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca

Page 138 of 147

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Date of Meeting:

December 12, 2024

Subject:

Minor Variance Application (S. 45(1) of Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2024-0129, Hutchings, 1277 Sheila Lane, Loughborough District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of the subject application for zoning relief for a seasonal dwelling, subject to conditions, as this application meets the four tests of a minor variance outlined in section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Background The existing seasonal dwelling has an attached wet-slip boathouse beneath its main floor. The original proposal sought to rebuild the seasonal dwelling and boathouse in their current footprint. Following consultation with Cataraqui Conservation, it was determined that boathouses are not permitted to have attached living space. A revised proposal only involving the re-construction of the seasonal dwelling, setback further from the shoreline, was submitted. The applicants still intend to rebuild the boathouse within its footprint but are not proposing to increase area or height, as permitted by the Zoning By-law. Therefore, the boathouse is no longer being considered as part of this application. Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: RLSW Proposal This proposal seeks relief from Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit a new seasonal dwelling in the RLSW Zone. The applicant proposes to replace the existing 995ft2 (92.5m2) seasonal dwelling setback 0 metres from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake. The proposed seasonal dwelling would be located in the area of an existing frame shed and carport, which would be demolished. Zoning relief is required to permit a 7m setback from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake and the front lot line, and a 6m setback from the top of bank. The proposed seasonal dwelling would have a ground floor area of 1984ft2 (184.4m2), a gross floor area of 2664ft2 (247.6m2) and a building height of 24ft (7.3m). The floor area would be broken down into a 1332ft2 (123.8m2) main floor, a 1332ft2 (123.8m2) walkout basement, a 588ft2 (54.6m2) attached deck, and a 64ft2 (6m2) covered porch. The proposal would facilitate the installation of a new septic system.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 139 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0129

Zoning Relief Requested Section 5.8.2 (b) – To permit a seasonal dwelling & attached deck to be setback 6m from the top of bank, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 15m. Section 5.8.2 (a) & Section 10.3.1 – To permit a seasonal dwelling & attached deck to be setback 7m from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 30m. Section 10.3.1 – To permit a seasonal dwelling & attached deck to be setback 7m from the front lot line, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 30m. Related Applications The lands are not subject to any additional applications under the Planning Act. Property Description The subject property is a lot of record measuring approximately 1.81Ac in area, with frontage on the south shore of Sydenham Lake and Carslake Lane. Existing development is concentrated near the shoreline and consists of a seasonal dwelling with attached boathouse and three detached accessory structures (bunk house, storage shed & carport). The property it is only accessible via Sheila Lane which extends from the west through several neighbouring properties. The property is well vegetated and features a variety of mature tree species, except in the immediate area of seasonal dwelling. Part of the seasonal dwelling hangs over the shoreline, but the remaining area is well vegetated and features several mature coniferous trees. Topography varies but is characterized by a downward slope towards the shoreline starting in approximately the middle of the property. The slope levels slightly near the existing cottage, before dropping down considerable at the shoreline, forming a small cliff with exposed rock. The surrounding area is characterized by similar style limited-service residential waterfront uses. Department and Agency Comments Cataraqui Conservation comments were not received at the time of writing this report. CRCA comments will be shared when they become available. Building Services provided comment on November 27, 2024. Staff have no objection to the proposal. It was noted that the existing sewage system is undersized for the proposed development. The required septic system upgrades will be reviewed further at the building permit stage. Public Service were not circulated as the subject property is located on a private lane. Public Comments No public comments were received at the time of writing this report. www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 140 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0129

Planning Analysis The proposal needs to be assessed against the four tests of a minor variance outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. It is the opinion of Planning staff that the proposal meets the four tests as explained below. Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The variance would facilitate the construction of a new seasonal dwelling on lands designated Rural on Schedule A of the Official Plan. The type and amount of development on rural lands must maintain the rural character, natural heritage and cultural landscape in the Township. A seasonal dwelling is a permitted use in the Rural designation. Section 5.2.4 of the Official Plan states that the Township will direct development or site alteration away from lands which may be subject to shoreline erosion hazard. This is typically addressed through a 15m setback from the top of bank, as required by the Zoning By-law. The proposed seasonal dwelling would be setback 6m from the stable top of bank, in compliance with Cataraqui Conservation regulatory guidelines that satisfy Provincial access allowance requirements for future maintenance or emergency. The existing seasonal dwelling significantly encroaches over the top of bank. Therefore, the 6m setback is interpreted as an improvement over existing conditions. Township Staff are satisfied that the proposal would not result in, or be impacted by, a shoreline erosion hazard. Section 5.2.7 of the Official Plan requires buildings and structures to be setback a minimum of 30m from the highwater mark of a waterbody. The purpose is to minimize environmental and visual impacts by reducing phosphorus inputs, preventing erosion and by maintaining the natural appearance of the shoreline. Further, Section 5.7.7 requires limited-service residential developments to be designated to preserve as much as possible a site’s physical attributes for the benefit of future residents. The existing seasonal dwelling with attached boathouse encroaches over the highwater mark. In comparison, the proposed dwelling would have a highwater mark setback of 9.5m, with the attached deck being 7m. The proposed seasonal dwelling would be constructed to the immediate rear of the existing dwelling. Presently, this proposed location is mostly cleared. Further, the proposed location is relatively flat compared to the surrounding area. In this way, the location would have the effect of minimizing tree removal and site alteration. It would be challenging to further increase the highwater mark setback without significant site alteration due to topography. An upward slope begins to the rear of the proposed location. Therefore, it is the opinion of planning staff that the highwater mark setback has been maximized. The proposed highwater mark setback of 7m is interpreted as an improvement over existing conditions. To accommodate the proposed development, a new septic tank would need to be installed. The existing tank is to the immediate east of the existing seasonal, less than 5m from the highwater mark. Section 6.10.4 of the Official Plan indicates that no minor variance shall be required for the replacement of an existing substandard system. In these circumstances, the location of the replacement system is determined with Township Building Staff and must comply with Ontario Building Code Requirements (i.e., a minimum of 15m from water). This www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 141 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0129

implies that the new septic tank would be located further from Sydenham Lake, which would be an improvement over existing condition. The existing leaching bed is currently setback 51m from the highwater mark and may also require replacement. It is the opinion of Township Planning Staff that the proposed variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan, specifically the policies related to limited services waterfront residential development, and development adjacent to environmentally sensitive area. Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? A seasonal dwelling is a permitted use in the RLSW Zone. The proposal would increase lot coverage from 1.3% to 2.6% and would comply with all Zoning By-law requirements except for minimum setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody, minimum setback from the front lot line, and minimum setback from the top of bank. Section 5.8.2 of the Zoning By-law directs development away from slopes which are greater than 30% from horizontal. This is typically accomplished through a 15m setback from the top of bank, whereas the proposed seasonal dwelling is to be setback 6m. As previously discussed, the proposed 6m setback would satisfy both Cataraqui Conservation regulatory guidelines and provincial access allowance requirements. Further, the incorporation of appropriate erosion control measures and the maintenance of a healthy shoreline buffer will assist in stabilizing soil during construction and over the long-term. The General Provisions and the RLSW zone require a 30m setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody. As previously discussed, the highwater mark setback has been maximized when considering topographical constraints. The proposed location would also have the effect of minimizing tree removal and site alteration. The RLSW zone requires a 30m setback from the front lot line of a property. In the case of a lot with frontage on a private lane and a navigable waterway, the lot line between the waterbody and the lot is considered the front lot line. The front lot line setback and highwater mark setback are the same (7m). The improvement in setback distance and maintenance of shoreline vegetation should act as an effective buffer and mitigate against visual impacts on the lake. It is the opinion of Township Planning Staff that the proposed variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Is the requested variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure in question? The requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The proposal would increase lot coverage to 2.5%, well within the permitted maximum (5%). Given the characteristics of the property, Township Staff have concluded that the highwater mark and top of bank setbacks have been maximized. Further, the improved setback distance and maintenance of existing vegetation along the shoreline will assist in visually screening the structure from the lake. www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 142 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0129

Is the variance minor? The requested variance is minor as it maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The requested variance is also desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The proposed development would generally improve upon existing conditions of the property and is unlikely to result in adverse impacts on the lake. Further, it is anticipated that there will be no negative impacts on surrounding properties as a result of the proposed seasonal dwelling. Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve minor variance application PL-ZNA-2024-0129 for 1277 Sheila Lane, subject to the following conditions.

The minor variance is for a seasonal dwelling with attached deck and covered porch. The deck that would be attached to the proposed dwelling is permitted to establish a minimum 7 metre front yard, to be setback a minimum of 7m from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake, and to be setback 6m from the top of bank. The proposed dwelling is permitted to establish a minimum 9.5m setback from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake. The location of the dwelling and all attached structures on the property must be consistent with the application sketch provided with the application (Dated November 13, 2024) attached to this decision as “Schedule A”.
The Owner is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the following matters and environmental standards of the Township: a. Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g. silt fence, straw bales) must be used during construction and until the site is stable and revegetated. b. Roof runoff will be directed away from Sydenham Lake and discharged to natural or constructed leaching pits/areas to maximize infiltration or onto coarse rock rubble splash pads to reduce the velocity of runoff. c. A natural vegetated buffer must be maintained in its natural state within 30 metres of Sydenham Lake, except in the immediate area of the building envelope. www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 143 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2024-0129

d. Soil Stabilization and naturalization of the area of the existing dwelling following its demolition and completion of the new dwelling. 3. The owner is required to have the location of the proposed seasonal dwelling pinned and its setback from the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake and top of bank confirmed through the submission of a letter of verification by an Ontario Land Surveyor to be compliant with the Committee’s decision, prior to the construction of the footings occurring and to the satisfaction of the Township’s Chief Building Official or their designate. 4. A building permit is required for ALL proposed demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac. 5. Minor variance PL-ZNA-2024-0129 is applicable only to Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws. Report Prepared By: Noah Perron, Planner Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Manager of Planning

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 144 of 147

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Report Date:

December 12, 2024

Subject:

Decisions on Delegated Consents

Summary This report is an information report to the Committee of Adjustment summarizing the Consents that have been approved by Delegated Authority since the last Committee of Adjustment Meeting.

Background The authority to grant undisputed consents is delegated to the Director of Development Services under By-law 2020-27. This report lists the applications which met the criteria for being considered as an undisputed consent and have received provisional consent approval. Committee of Adjustment is notified for information.

Discussion/Analysis a) PL-BDJ-2024-0098 (Orser) – Loughborough District This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on November 14, 2024. The purpose of the application was for the creation of one new rural residential lot from vacant unaddressed lands on Rutledge Road. The severed parcel is approximately 1.6ha in area with 87m of frontage on Rutledge Road. The retained lot will be approximately 38ha in area with 150m of frontage on Rutledge Road. b) PL-BDJ-2024-0091 (Lanteigne) (Arcadis) – Storrington District This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on November 20, 2024. The purpose of the application was for one residential lot addition. The proposed severed parcel is vacant and is approximately 0.67ha in area with 129m of frontage on O’Neil Lane and 52m of frontage on Loughborough. The retained lot will be approximately 7.3ha in area with 421m of frontage on O’Neil Lane and 470m of frontage on Loughborough Lake. As a result of the lot addition the benefitting parcel (3990 O’Neil Lane) will increase in area from 0.28ha to 0.95ha in area, the O’Neil Lane frontage will increase from 43.1m to 129.1m and the water frontage will increase from 49.8m to 102m. The purpose of the lot addition is to facilitate the construction of an addition on the existing dwelling at 3990 O’Neil Lane.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 145 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report – Decisions on Delegated Consents

Appendix A – Mapping of application(s) Report Prepared By: Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk Report Approved By: Brad Wright, Director of Development Services

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 146 of 147

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report – Decisions on Delegated Consents

APPENDIX A

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 147 of 147

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.