Committee Of Adjustment - 12 Oct 2023 - Agenda

Published October 12, 2023

Word Count 16690 words

Reading Time 79 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: October 12, 2023 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2023/Committee Of Adjustment - 12 Oct 2023 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Committee Of Adjustment Meeting Agenda TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Thursday, October 12, 2023 Council Chambers/Virtual Via Zoom .

Call to Order

Resolution.

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution.

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting will be live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/ Please visit the Virtual Committee of Adjustment Meetings page on the Township website for the link to register to be a participant in this meeting: https://www.southfrontenac.net/en/open-for-business/virtualcommittee-of-adjustment-meetings.aspx Instructions about participating via Computer, Laptop, Smartphone, Tablet and Telephone can be found at the above noted link as well.

PowerPoint Presentation Staff has prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that will be displayed on the screen of the meeting, you can also follow along with the PDF version that is in the attachment of this agenda item.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

None declared.

Approval of Minutes – September 14, 2023

Resolution.

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

There are none.

New Consent Applications:

There are none.

Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

There are none.

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2023-0104 (Asselstine) - Loughborough

3 - 40

41 - 50

51 - 72

Property Address: 3572 Holleford Road

Page 1 of 113

Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant seeks relief from section 7.3.2 of Zoning By-Law 200375 to permit a 66.8 square metre storage shed to be setback 6.5 metres from the front lot line, and a 12.2 square metre storage shed to be setback 5 metres from the front lot line. b)

PL-ZNA-2023-0108 (Sleeth) - Storrington

73 111

Property Address: 122 Osborne Lane Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant seeks to enlarge a legal non-conforming boathouse located on Dog Lake. Zoning By-law 2003-75 classifies boathouses as a prohibited use. The existing boathouse was 44.5 square metres in area and the proposed boathouse is to be 62.4 square metres in area. 10.

Other Business

Consent Granting Authority Report

Adjournment

Resolution.

112 113

Page 2 of 113

Committee of Adjustment Meeting Page 3 of 113

Thursday, October 12, 2023 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers 4432 George Street, Sydenham, ON and Virtual on Zoom

Welcome to the Virtual Meeting for the Committee of Adjustment

This is a hearing of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of South Frontenac. All members of the public joining on Zoom are muted on our end and your cameras will not be turned on. Committee Members

Township Staff

• Alan Revill

• Kate Kaestner (Planning Clerk/SecretaryTreasurer)

• Brett Moreland • Doug Morey • Kevin Fox • Mike Howe • Norm Roberts Page 4 of 113

• Randy Ruttan • Steven Pegrum

• Christine Woods (Senior Planner) • Noah Perron (Planner) • Tom Fehr (Planner)

Call to Order Adoption of Agenda

Page 5 of 113

• Call to Order • Adoption of Agenda • Electronic Meeting Information • Declaration of Pecuniary Interests • Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting • Hearings for Applications • Consent Granting Authority Report • Other Business • Adjournment

Meeting Information Format for Each Hearing

The Chair will introduce the file
The Planner will provide an overview of the application
The Planner will make a recommendation on the application
Questions or comments from the Applicant / Agent / Members of the Public
Committee deliberation and vote
The Chair will state whether the vote was carried Page 6 of 113

After the Meeting • Township staff will be in contact with the applicant following the meeting. Where a decision has been made, it will be forwarded to the applicant and anyone who has requested to be notified within 15 days. • The applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body in as defined by the Planning Act subsection 1(1) may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The appeal must be filed with the SecretaryTreasurer of the Committee of Adjustment within 20 days of the notice of decision. The notice of appeal must set out the reasons for the appeal and be accompanied by the fee required by the Tribunal. Page 7 of 113

• If you have any questions after the meeting, please reach out to staff.

How to Speak to an Application • The Chair of the meeting will open the floor to public comments • Click “Raise Hand” button to request to speak or dial *9 (star nine) when participating by telephone • The Chair will recognize a member of the public, and the Meeting Host will unmute the member of the public • Once the member of the public is done speaking or the Committee has no further questions, the Meeting Host will mute their microphone • If a member of the public attending in person wishes to speak, we ask that they raise their hand, wait to be called on and clearly state their name for the record. Page 8 of 113

In Case of Technical Difficulties • If a Committee member joining virtually disconnects from the meeting, the meeting will proceed if there is still quorum. The Committee member will attempt to reconnect. • If quorum cannot be met within 15 minutes, the meeting will be postponed. • Staff will be in touch with applicants. • A notice will also be posted on the Township’s social media if the meeting is postponed.

Page 9 of 113

Declaration of Pecuniary Interests Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting

Page 10 of 113

Consent Applications from Previous Meetings

Page 11 of 113

New Consent Applications

Page 12 of 113

Minor Variance / Permission to Enlarge Legal Non-Conforming Use Applications Carried Over from Previous Meeting

Page 13 of 113

New Minor Variance / Permission to Enlarge Legal Non-Conforming Use Applications

Page 14 of 113

Application PL-ZNA-2023-0104 Minor Variance

Applicants: Debbie & Peter Asselstine Property: 3572 Holleford Road

Page 15 of 113

Property Description

Page 16 of 113

• Lot area of 2Ac – With frontage on Holleford Road • Existing dwelling (400sqm) w/ attached garage, swimming pool, detached accessory structure • Property elevated from Holleford Road • Tree buffer along northern lot line • Rural Designation • RU Zone

Proposal

Page 17 of 113

• Recognize existing 12.2sqm (132sqft) Storage Shed • Proposed 66.8sqm (720sqft) Storage Building • Seeking relief from Zoning Bylaw to permit: • A 6.5m setback from the front lot line for both structures • Proposal complies with all other requirements of the Zoning Bylaw Proposed Site Plan

Page 18 of 113

Location of existing & proposed structures (Facing east towards Holleford Road)

Location viewable from Holleford Road (Facing Northwest)

Department, Agency and Public Comments • Public Services – No Objection • Conservation Authority & Building Services – Not circulated due to the nature of the application • Public Comment – None received at the time of preparing this presentation

Page 19 of 113

Planning Analysis Variance meets four tests of a minor variance

Maintains the general intent and purpose of the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan
Maintains the general intent and purpose of Zoning By-law No. 2003-75
Is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question
Is minor Page 20 of 113

Recommendation • Approval • Pending any comments received • Subject to condition:

• Variance permits a 12.2sqm & 66.8sqm to be setback 6.5m from the front lot line. Location must be consistent with sketch submitted by applicant • Building permit for the proposed structure • Only application to Zoning By-law 2003-75

Page 21 of 113

Public Questions and Comments If you would like to speak: • Use “Raise Hand” feature at the bottom of your screen. • Dial*9 (star nine) for phone. • Please wait to speak until you hear your name and your microphone has been unmuted.

Page 22 of 113

PL-ZNA-2023-0104 Committee Deliberation and Vote

Page 23 of 113

Application PL-ZNA-2023-0108 Permission to Enlarge Legal Non-Conforming Use

Applicant: Jefferey Sleeth and Jennifer Spronck Property: 122 Osborne Lane

Page 24 of 113

Property Description

Page 25 of 113

• 0.3ha lot area • 200m frontage on Dog Lake • Property is a peninsula that is primarily flat with a hill towards the southern end. Primarily treed. • Contains dwelling, boathouse, and accessory buildings • Rural • RLSW zone

Proposal • Permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal non-conforming boathouse. • Existing boathouse was 44.5sqm Page 26 of 113

• Proposed boathouse is 62.4sqm

Page 27 of 113

View of boathouse from across bay

Page 28 of 113

Page 29 of 113

Side view of boathouse

Along west side

Along east side

Page 30 of 113

Page 31 of 113

Area of proposed boathouse

Page 32 of 113

Area of proposed boathouse

Area of proposed boathouse from across bay

Department, Agency and Public Comments • Cataraqui Conservation – No comments as it is under Parks Canada jurisdiction • Parks Canada – Has issued a permit for proposed boathouse • Public Comments – None received

Page 33 of 113

Planning Analysis

Page 34 of 113

• A boathouse is a prohibited use under the Township’s Zoning By-law • However, the structure was built prior to current Zoning By-law, therefore is legal non-conforming use • Minimal expansion compared to existing = 17.9sqm increase • Proposed boathouse constructed in same location as existing boathouse – minimize site disturbance/vegetation removal • No visual impacts anticipated • Parks Canada permit will address items related to construction timing, vegetation removal, sediment erosion controls.

Recommendation • Approval • Pending any comments received • Subject to conditions • The application is approved in accordance with submitted drawings • Building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property Page 35 of 113

Page 36 of 113

PL-ZNA-2023-0108 Committee Deliberation and Vote

Page 37 of 113

Consent Granting Authority Report • PL-BDJ-2023-0090 (Oullette) (Beach) - Storrington • Creation of one new residential lot • 3.5 acres in area, contains an existing dwelling • Fronting on Sands Road

• PL-BDJ-2023-0097 (Rosnak) - Bedford • Creation of Right-of Way connecting to Crow Lake Road • PL-BDJ-2023-0093 (Way) - Loughborough • Creation of one new waterfront residential lot • 9.9 acres in area • 127m frontage on Sheila Lane, 131m frontage on Sydenham Lake

Page 38 of 113

• PL-BDJ-2023-0096 (Asselstine) - Portland • Creation of one new residential lot • 5.8 acres in area • Fronting on County Road 38

Other Business

Page 39 of 113

Adjournment

Page 40 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023

Township of South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Meeting # Time: 7:00 PM Location: Council Chambers/Virtual Via Zoom Present: Norm Roberts, Doug Morey, Steve Pegrum, Randy Ruttan, Alan Revill, Brett Moreland, Kevin Fox, Mike Howe Absent: Staff: Christine Woods, Senior Planner; Tom Fehr, Planner; Noah Perron, Planner; Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer 1

Call to Order Resolution No. 2023-08-01 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the September 14th, 2023 meeting of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of South Frontenac is hereby called to order at 7:00 p.m.

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution. Resolution No. 2023-08-02 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the Committee of Adjustment adopts the Agenda for the September 14th, 2023 meeting. Carried

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting was live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/

Staff prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that was displayed on the screen of the meeting.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

Randy Ruttan declared a Conflict of Interest for Agenda Item #6 a) as he and the applicant are close acquaintances. Approval of Minutes – August 10, 2023

Page 41 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 a)

Resolution. Resolution No. 2023-08-03 Moved by: Steve Pegrum Seconded by: Mike Howe THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves the Minutes of the August 08, 2023 Committee of Adjustment meeting. Carried

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

PL-BDJ-2022-0155 (Snider) - Loughborough Property Address: 4617 Bedford Road Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant is requesting consent for the creation of a new lot on Bedford Road. The proposed severed lot will be 1.7 acres (0.7 hectares) with a frontage of 146 metres (479 feet) along Bedford Road. The retained lot will be 2 acres (0.8 hectares) with 94 metres (310 feet) of frontage on Bedford Road. The proposed use for the severed lot is residential. Christine Woods, Senior Planner, delivered her presentation to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be denied. Deputy Chair Revill asked whether the applicant, agent or member of the public who wished to speak to the application. Mr. Richard Lobb, neighbouring property owner expressed his concerns over safe access to the property. Deputy Chair Revill asked a second time whether the applicant, agent or member of the public who wished to speak to the application. Lynn Snider, Applicant, stated that the Roads department had already visited the property and approved a suitable location for entrance to the property. Deputy Chair Revill asked for a 3rd time whether the applicant, agent or member of the public who wished to speak to the application. None heard. Deputy Chair Revill inquired as to whether any members of the Committee wished to speak to the application. Committee member Steve Pegrum inquired as to whether, if the application was to be approved, a condition could be included that the survey stakes remain visible in perpetuity so that there is no confusion surrounding property boundaries. Mr. Pegrum also stated that the property is adjacent to the hamlet area, where development is to be directed. Ms. Woods responded that it is illegal to remove iron survey bars, however over time they sink into the ground and get covered by grass. Regarding the settlement areas, Ms. Woods responded that increasing development and density in these areas is desired, however, in situations where there are private wells and septic systems, increasing density can increase the risk of contaminating the groundwater. Development in settlement areas needs to be orderly, and meet the criteria that are set.

Page 42 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 Mr. Pegrum stated that he believed the building department indicated there was adequate separation between a proposed sewage system and well on the property. Ms. Woods responded that the building department only spoke to the adequate soil conditions and area on the property to install a sewage system, and did not speak to separation between septic and well. She also stated there was not yet a well drilled on the severed parcel, and that it would be a condition of the consent if it were to be approved. Deputy Charis Revill asked if there were any further questions or comments from members of the committee. Committee member Doug Morey inquired as to the total lot size of the subject property. Ms. Woods responded that the property was 1.5 hectares or 3.78 acres in size. Mr. Morey stated that there seemed to be a missed opportunity to split the property in a more desirable way, that being straight across, to create more a suitable lot shape and inquired as to whether that was ever considered by the applicant. Ms. Woods stated that she understands the applicant was advised at the preapplication stage that this proposal would not be supported by staff and the applicant was advised to not apply or to change their proposal. Applicant Lynn Snider responded that the reason for the current proposal was to try to keep the retained portion at 2 acres, as they are trying to create a smaller piece of property, that being the severed parcel, to retire to. Mr. Morey again inquired as to whether the applicant ever considered just dividing the property with a straight line and then re-orienting the existing driveway, he would then not have to move the existing sewage system on the property. Mr. Snider responded that he had not considered that. Mr. Morey responded that as it is presented, the application is close enough to the hamlet, but to deal with the irregular shape, he inquired as to whether there be a condition added to erect a fence along the property line. Ms. Woods responded that she would have to look at the Planning Act to see whether that could be included as a condition, and that when the property was originally created and developed, the dwelling was placed directly in the centre of the property which makes it undesirable for severance, and that other options for severance were presented to the applicant and that this was the proposal that they submitted. Deputy Chair Revill stated that the proposal satisfies most of his concerns, and as such there is merit in seeing the application move forward. Deputy Chair Revill inquired as to whether there were any further comments from the Committee members. Committee member Mike Howe stated that he had been struggling with the application for a while, and spoke to the applicants being outstanding members of the community. He stated that when he visited the site he was concerned about the septic system and the angle of the property and as such, he felt

Page 43 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 comfortable deferring the application when it was originally presented to see if there was was a more desirable way to divide the property. Mr. Howe stated that seeing that the proposal was the same caused him to feel conflicted in wanting to support the Planning Department while also supporting the community members. Committee Member Roberts stated that he is not able to speak to or vote on the application as he was absent at the Committee of Adjustment meeting at which the application was originally presented. Resolution No. 2023-08-04 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Doug Morey THAT the Committee of Adjustment denies Consent Application PL-BDJ-20220155 for property located at 4617 Bedford Road. DEFEATED Resolution No. 2023-08-05 Moved by: Steve Pegrum Seconded by: Doug Morey THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves Consent Application PL-BDJ-20220155 for property located at 4617 Bedford Road, to permit the creation of one new residential lot, being 0.7 hectares in size and fronting on Bedford Road, subject to conditions. Carried 7

New Consent Applications:

PL-BDJ-2023-0075 (Morin) (Rodriguez) - Portland Property Address: 3361 Scanlan Road Purpose and Effect of the Application: The application seeks to create one new rural residential lot. The severed parcel is approximately 2.4ha (6 acres) with 56.7m (186ft) of frontage on Scanlan Road. The retained lot is approximately 0.9ha (2.2 acres) with 56.7m (186ft) of frontage on Scanlan Road. The severed lands contain a storage building and the retained lands contain a single detached dwelling and accessory buildings. Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be deferred to address the location of the sewage system on the subject property and it’s relation to the proposed property boundary. Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, agent or members of the public on the application. The agent, Joshua Rodriguez, stated that he had met with the septic inspector earlier in the day and has since submitted a revised proposal to the Planning department. Chair Ruttan inquired, 2 more times, as to whether there were any further comments from the applicant, agent or public. None heard.

Page 44 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments from Committee members regarding the application. Committee Member Pegrum asked whether the change in the proposed property lines would require the application to be brought back to the Committee at a later date. Mr. Fehr confirmed that the revised application needs to be reviewed by planning staff and then brought back to the Committee for decision. Chair Ruttan asked whether there were any further comments from Committee members. Committee Member Revill acknowledged the time constraint with the revision being submitted earlier in the day and commended planning staff on providing the applicant with various options for moving forward with the application. Chair Ruttan asked for a 3rd time whether there were any further comments from Committee members. Chair Ruttan echoed Mr. Revill’s comments, commending staff for working with the applicant to move the application forward. Resolution No. 2023-08-06 Moved by: Mike Howe Seconded by: Steve Pegrum THAT the Committee of Adjustment defers Consent application PL-BDJ-20230075 to allow the applicant and agent time to address the location of the existing sewage system on the retained parcel, and it’s relation to the proposed property boundary. Carried 8 Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable) a)

There are none.

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2023-0076 (Morin) (Roriguez) - Portland Property Address: 3361 Scanlan Road Purpose and Effect of the Application:

The minor variance application is related to consent application PL-BDJ2022-0075. The application is requesting minor variances to recognize the reduced lot frontage of the severed and retained lots which are both to be 56.7m whereas 76m is required in the RU zone. The application is also requesting a minor variance to permit the 3m setback of the existing storage building on the severed lot from the new interior lot line. This application was presented in conjunction with Agenda item # 7. a), consent application PL-BDJ-2023-0075. Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be deferred to address the location of the

Page 45 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 sewage system on the subject property and it’s relation to the proposed property boundary. Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, agent or members of the public on the application. The agent, Joshua Rodriguez, stated that he had met with the septic inspector earlier in the day and has since submitted a revised proposal to the Planning department. Chair Ruttan inquired, 2 more times, as to whether there were any further comments from the applicant, agent or public. None heard. Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether there were any comments from Committee members regarding the application. Committee Member Pegrum asked whether the change in the proposed property lines would require the application to be brought back to the Committee at a later date. Mr. Fehr confirmed that the revised application needs to be reviewed by planning staff and then brought back to the Committee for decision. Chair Ruttan asked whether there were any further comments from Committee members. Committee Member Revill acknowledged the time constraint with the revision being submitted earlier in the day and commended planning staff on providing the applicant with various options for moving forward with the application. Chair Ruttan asked for a 3rd time whether there were any further comments from Committee members. Chair Ruttan echoed Mr. Revill’s comments, commending staff for working with the applicant to move the application forward. Resolution No. 2023-08-07 Moved by: Steve Pegrum Seconded by: Mike Howe THAT the Committee of Adjustment defers Minor Variance application PL-ZNA2023-0076 to allow the applicant and agent time to address the location of the existing sewage system on the retained parcel, and it’s relation to the proposed property boundary. Carried b)

PL-ZNA-2022-0161 (Wilson) - Portland Property Address: 2073 Hambly Lane Purpose & Effect of the Application: The applicant seeks to construct a two storey single detached dwelling and a septic system on the property. The dwelling will have a ground floor area of 90.4sqm and a gross floor area of 180.8sqm. No deck is proposed with the application. Minor variances are being requested to allow the dwelling and septic system to be set back less than 30m from the highwater mark. The single detached dwelling will be set back 22.5m from the highwater mark and the septic system will be set back 27m from the high water mark.

Page 46 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023

Tom Fehr, Planner, delivered his presentation to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved with conditions. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times, as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, agent or member of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times as to whether there were any comments from members of the Committee on the application. None heard. Resolution No. 2023-08-08 Moved by: Mike Howe Seconded by: Steve Pegrum THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves Minor Variance application PLZNA-2022-0161 for property municipally known as 2073 Hambly Lane to permit the construction of a two-story single detached dwelling to establish a 22 metre front yard setback from the highwater mark of Hambly Lake and to permit a septic system to be located 27 metres from the highwater mark of Hambly Lake, subject to conditions. Carried c)

PL-ZNA-2023-0084 (Burns) - Storrington Property Address: 1367B Burnt Hills Road Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 273sqm (2938.5sqft) single detached dwelling and sewage system. The proposed single detached dwelling requires zoning relief in order to be located 6m from the top of bank and 15m from the highwater mark of Dog Lake. Relief is also required to permit up to 6% lot coverage. Finally, the proposed sewage system requires zoning relief to be setback 27m from the highwater mark of Dog Lake.

Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his presentation to the Committee with the staff recommendation that the application be denied. Chair Ruttan asked, 3 times, as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, their agent or member of the public. None heard. Chair Ruttan inquired as to whether any Committee members wished to speak to the application. Committee member Revill inquired as to the level of detail that the Planning department requires on a plot plan as part of a planning application submission. Mr. Perron responded that the application form includes a list of requirements for the sketch in order for it to be accepted, but that Planning staff always advises the applicant to be as accurate as possible in their rendering. Mr. Perron stated that the applicant was given opportunities to revise their sketch to include more information, but the Department does not currently require the sketch to be prepared by a Land Surveyor and as such, the application is being presented with what information the department has been provided.

Page 47 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 Chair Ruttan asked for a second time as to whether there were any comments from Committee Members. Committee Member Pegrum inquired as to what other options would be available to the applicant other than rotating the dwelling on the property. Mr. Perron responded that in addition to rotating the proposed dwelling, the building plans could be revised to propose a dwelling that would be better suited for the subject lot. Mr. Pegrum asked for clarification regarding the potential negative impacts to Dog Lake when the Conservation Authority had no objections to the proposal. Mr. Perron reminded Mr. Pegrum that the Conservation Authorities review of Planning applications has been greatly reduced following changes in provincial legislation and as such they are only able to comment on floodplan and erosion hazards. Chair Ruttan asked for a third time whether there were any further comments from Committee Members. Committee member Doug Morey commented that he would be most comfortable deferring the application. Committee Member Revill inquired as to how much redesign work would be required in submitting a more satisfiable design to staff. Burt Burns, applicant, replied that having new designs created would be costly, and that rotating the dwelling on the property would create problems with the configuration of the driveway and the location of the septic system, as well as the neighbour’s access to their property. Doug Morey inquired as to whether the applicant had considered forgoing the attached garage to increase the setback from Dog Lake. Mr. Burns replied that the garage is the larger part of the proposed structure and he would prefer to have it for storage. Committee member Norm Roberts stated that rotating the dwelling as was suggested would cause the bedroom window to be facing the granite outcropping instead of the lake, and that he would much prefer to see the lake, and that he would support the approval of the application. Brett Moreland, Committee member, stated that he had visited the site and he saw that constraints of the property, but that he felt there were some positives with the proposed location of the dwelling and septic system, as they would not require the removal of the granite outcropping. As such, he stated his support for approving the application. Resolution No. 2023-08-09 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Steve Pegrum THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves Minor Variance application PLZNA-2023-0084 for property municipally known as 1367B Burnt Hills Road, to permit a 273 square metre single detached dwelling to be located 6 metres from

Page 48 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 the top of bank and 15 metres from the highwater mark of Dog Lake, and to permit a sewage system to be located 27 metres from the highwater mark of Dog Lake, subject to conditions. Carried d)

PL-ZNA-2023-0085 (Wheeler) - Loughborough Property Address: 1006 Mini Lane Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 53.5sqm (576sqft) detached garage on the subject property. The proposed detached garage will be 6.5m (21.33ft) in height and will occupy space off the existing driveway, near the rear lot line of the subject property. The proposed detached garage requires zoning relief to be located 26.2m (86ft) from the highwater mark of Buck Lake, 10m (33ft) from the top of bank, and 2m (6.5) from the rear lot line. Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his presentation to the Committee with the staff recommendation that the application be approved with conditions. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times, as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, agent or member of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times as to whether there were any comments from members of the Committee on the application. None heard. Resolution No. 2023-08-10 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves Minor Variance application PLZNA-2023-0085 for property municipally known as 1006 Mini Lane to permit an accessory structure, being a 53.5 square metre detached garage, to be located 26.2 metres from the highwater mark of Buck Lake, 10 metres from the top of bank and 2 metres from the rear lot line, subject to conditions. Carried

PL-ZNA-2023-0094 (Morgan) - Storrington Property Address: 2735 Round Lake Road Purpose and Effect of the Application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 26sqm (280sqft) shed on the subject property. The proposal would result in the lot coverage of all accessory structures (0.19%) to be above that of the principal building (0.11%). Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his presentation to the Committee with the staff recommendation that the application be approved with conditions. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times, as to whether there were any comments from the applicant, agent or member of the public regarding the application. None heard. Chair Ruttan inquired, 3 times as to whether there were any comments from members of the Committee on the application. None heard.

Page 49 of 113

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment September, 14, 2023 Resolution No. 2023-08-11 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the Committee of Adjustment approves Minor Variance application PLZNA-2023-0094 for property municipally known as 2735 Round Lake Road, to permit an accessory structure, being a 26 square metre storage shed, to establish an overall lot coverage for accessory buildings of 0.19%; subject to conditions. Carried 10

Other Business

Consent Granting Authority Report Kate Kaestner delivered the report to the Committee.

Adjournment

Resolution. Resolution No. 2023-08-12 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the September 14th, 2023 meeting of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of South Frontenac is hereby adjourned at 8:22 p.m. to reconvene on Thursday, October 12th, 2023 at 7:00 pm, or at the call of the Chair. Carried

Randy Ruttan, Chair

Page 50 of 113

Page 51 of 113

K._

Rideau

Quinte

Cataraqui

Township Minor Minor Minor system

vary

‘ntent intent

appropriate

Zoning

by—iaw

Authority

Conservation

Valley

that a Fee Authority the applicable

without

Tggae: a

and

Authority

new

Review

Conservation

Fee:

sketch, by debit

?led

Class

the

with

Secretary—

Admin

sewage

with

sewage

Fee:

( Se th pa e ra te

a byTreasurer non— or refund card cheq able ue

the

n n

Towns

co nf or or m s t in gr u c t u or alt err passe e d,

legal

was

building

review onsite an application be submitted

$97.00

Building $97.00

Chapter hip Committee

structure by-law

accompanied credit card,

extend day

the

appointed 1990, alter to

land, Plan. By—Iaw.

the

provided

persons R.S_O-. Act s. 45(2)

2023

Township to when submitting Authority, are to

the

Planning $999.00 $1 ,370.00 082.00 $2

the or

FRO’NlTEN|AC

WARP/&NlCE' 45(2),)

use of Official Zoning

the

or the the

application

enlarge

provisions

development purpose purpose

By-law

be for provided (where applicable)

permit

January,

SOUTH MIINIOFE (s.

of eight Cornmittee45 of the Planning or permission under

copy this of together with below in cash, Frontenac.

South Frontenac Only l/I/ITH Performance combination with in a than A system Class

Region

of Variance Variance Variance other

It is required Conservation payable to

Application 1-3 Variances Variances 4+ building After

permission grant to building or land, structure, by the by-law. prohibited

may

Requirements

purpose

any

the for the genera the general nature in

may

Updated

TOVWNSHVHP OF AP’PLllCA1TllOM FOR OR PERMussIoM

Section

It is required that one (1) Committee of Adjustment, accordance with the chart to the of South Township

where

for

Application

used

Committee

The lands

ls desirable Maintains Maintains is minor

variance:

Committee»

the

The that

Adjustrnevnt under a ?roml zoning:

?ormed

Rg~ll‘F’E-I|~4—£_C|

Corn-n'1-illtee is Committee minor variance

The

£::_-

Page 52 of 113

Please additional

READ

THIS

are

OIF

CAREFULLY

consull?aatixon fees prior

IITEIVI

ior and to

SOILFITHI FRCDNVTENAC PI’annin1,gvA.ct’, R.S.Cl-.

on any application construction.

this

APPLICATION P_13 c. 1990, as

FOR

only;

amended

these

NIIN‘C)R

agencies

VARIA NCE

questions Treasurer 376—3027

regarding of the e><t.2224).

herein is required under the Planning Act, the Committee of Adjustment/Land Division referenced application, and may be made an Agencies and Persons having interest Authorities, the collection this of information should be directed Committee Adjustment (P.O. Sydenham, of Box 100, Ont.,

Information

requested be used by ng the above

Personal

Personal information This information purpose revie of boards, Commissions,

Collection

Each‘ shall provide a sketch applicant showing the dimensions of the subje ct sh abutting Irands as outlined Question 29 of the application. The in sketch o dimensioned and scaled either Imperial or Metric measures. in This sketch, ld the Application is the basis the analysis for Form, of the Minor Variance Committee of Adjustment. It is strongly recommended that the applicant sp en time carefully to and thoroughly assemble the data and transfer the data d that the sketch be drawn with important accurate dimensions and mea application which does not include the above information may required not sure men regard, the applicant may secure wish the to assistance of a person who ts. drafting of such sketches. guide answering to the questions is A application

PLEASE

Note: These fees applications permit’

TOVWNISI-IIIVP

Page 53 of 113

Page 54 of 113

1 1 .

1 0.

The

subject

are

Ihe

the

Please indicate (l.e. residence,

area

subject

the relief

the

from

land:

the

subject

R..S-.01.

Zoning

property

subject

existing

be to public

3495

whether garage, shed,

there

use

uses

are

the

(

cannot

with

20?\

Yes

any

EXISTING

land?

the

By—law:

Area:

buildings

only, please distance

maintained

‘-

FOR

a;r¢c./

VARIA NCE

indicate fac

structures

these

Zo ni ng

the

parkin g es fro m

El/Yes

B<,:§
&1h:»>

<<’. of the

~Q<o<x\‘~
S953 ‘bc:<J \e

road?

II/II|N1€)I—"

roadllane):

amended

provisions

(on

T203.«Rec

comply

by water approximate

municipally

subject

the

etc.)

and

property

road.

used

road?

front

cx:eg,

use

P.13

Frontage

land.

APF"Ll\CA’lTIiO?lV

1 950:,

OCJCOKAFIA.

proposed

maintained

the or

and

Act;

FRQNWENAC

--an §c;’.\b oogoée£$’¥o ‘-‘cu;

extent

Aa:S»\at.Q

the

used nearest

S/OQUFITHI

Planning

R ‘YY. 9

Road/Lane:

privately

9\»°§\

What

and

why

and

zoning

\—\o\e—§gg 3

the

access

the

(:5.

facilities

Name

Does

reason

one

nature

Rc..yA\

water):

depth:

0-F"

o?kxec Anus l<_4>“ye‘§-<>.X

The

current

.De, Hog

The

Depth:

(on

frontage(s),

Frontage

The

TOVVNSHIP

Page 55 of 113

Selback

Building

Line

from

from Line

Area

14.Are

Mk.

13.The

any be

the

, \‘p‘

for

subject

l3’<(es

structure(s), land?

the

land:

R.S.O.

additions

building

existing

FQR NIINQR

indicate:

amended

“

VARIA NCE

building(s)

structure(s),

%\n4A §“<o<ov.c:)-e

(32

structure

APPLICATION P_13 c. 1 990,

2’-£()<.30’

(22

EACH

Act;

FROVMTEMAC

.2 NW2

‘5.3 5 m

subject

yes,

SOLNTHV Plarnningy

‘ _ ‘ 9L‘ “W

O§o?o$\rxc:

uses

High

building(s) built on

owe

proposed

frorn Setback Mark Water (If applicable)

Dimensions Floor

111

Q).

(1)

item

“":§’..’.,’,‘,".’.?‘:f.‘f°";§.,‘f,,‘,’""

Lot

Setback Side

Height

Lot

Setback Rear

Front

answer

of Sltruclurev residence)

If nhe

Type (E.g.

TTOVWNISHJIIF’ OF

Page 56 of 113

If the to

story)

NOTES:

High (If

yes,

your

and

lot 2)

please

plans

¢_

is yes,

SOLIJTI-ll Planning

for

‘TN

i OL’ L‘‘Y3

each

Act,

provide

include

7 lg?“

(2)

proposed

R..S;.O‘..

FROINFITENIALZ

details:

any

DEMOLITION

on mark relate

existing

building.

and

FOR

amended

structures?

VARIA NCE’

structure

MINOR

Yes

the setback lane, the same‘ CONSTRUCTIO NEW N

<3»

building

a private be will to the

P_13

addition,

APP’LI|CA\TllO’N‘

1 890,

is on property waterfront, setback from the high water required in this question total size the of completed

q.h‘_‘ 7‘

‘9*°‘€l»é 3 m

subject and the

one

(1)

$¥s\9.$
S‘}o:oc:g.

item

dimensions NOT the to

If the line The

Setback from Water Mark applicable)

Building

Ivuo

Outside

indicate

Dimensions

story

tb k f Siedealfot

Buildinglstructure

16,

cllu

tb k f Rzaralfot

Height

(Also

Slru residence)

answer

S tb ck from FreonI’.aLot Line

Type (E.g_

Tl)-VWN*SH]lP

Page 57 of 113

storm

Indicate operated privy,

water body,

the

time

drainage

9t\oa5;a_

sewage other

oi.

was

provided owned

existing

iixtu

bed

sewers,

exinstringl

the

owned

provided

ditches,

current

swales

the subject operated

other

Yes

the

and

a publicly or communal

means’?

owned well,

continued:

El Yes

o w n e d

la ke,

VARIA NCE"

subject

NIHNOIR

El Yes

publicly communal

a or

land

land individual

owner:

FOR

awrnended

have

structure?

constructed

land individual

subject

were

and

the subject operated

structures

encroach

rooms res

structure system?

uses

APPLJCATHONNI 3 1 990%,, c. P’.1

development?

Qes--Kc$33 N-e\r\

disposal a privately

and

2006

s>\

the

or septic acquired

living

plumbing

number

space

RAISING

FRONFFENACV Act, R.S..0>.

proposed

addition existing

the

details:

the

SOUJ’II’l-It Planning

buildings

provided

sewage system, means:

9<‘nug-Q.

whether

water

that

a privately means:

li.)§¢,

whether

system, or other

existing

(ou?xmn?

length

date

Zrr)

land

the Will on the

(d)

subject

Increase

(c)

the

Increase

(b)

Increase

uses

provide

include

(a)

the

T"ko.«")\

date

What

plans please

are

your

If yes,

Indicate

.The

20.The

19.The

T()VlllNlSl.-IIIP

Page 58 of 113

**Note:

importance

The distances property to

be and

septic

approximate land that

watercourses, wells and lines.

The the

location

The of

location of township

nearest

The

and

iii)

boundaries proposed

The

ii)

item

SKETCH

location

abutting natural subject river distance

all

to the ditches,

Show

file

subject

the

features

from

THE

of rn

wetlands, applicant’s the

a n d

the subjec t buildings,

subject crossing.

fields and wells, septic be shown. The SKETCH is carefully, neatly and accurately

these owners’

railway

location

subject

the

VARIAN CE

application

the

TOP

including

THE

betvveen bridge

land

the

been

number

under

I’llIINiC)vR

and artificial features land. include Examples or stream banks. barns.

lands.

FOR

amended

application

ever

number

ARROVV

following:

the

file

distance . . . . ._i.e. landmark as such point

the

land has Variance).

give

ov? an

APPLlCATIONi c.. P.13 19920:,

subjgecl

NORTH

the

(neighbours’) of

on~site to and abutting IS REQUIRED varied, should be prepared

drainage tanks.

adjacent

all

HAVE

showing

give

subject (l/linor

please

land is Consent.

the Act

please

yes,

FROl~lITEN’AC Act, R..S.0.

dimensions

yes,

reference lot line

buildings.

and

MUST

submitted

ET\lo

whether Planning

E40

indicate the of

SQUTH

Planning

the subject Subdivision

question

THE

must

“““

SKETCH

answer If the the application

El Yes

appliicalion

please If known, under Section

Yes

whethier Plan of

answer

indicate a of

If the of the

Please approval

TTC):VV&N|SI’IliP’

Page 59 of 113

Page 60 of 113

Nature

appoint address

appear the full

Cornplleting

the

on number

act

FDR avnnended

070,

the here

—

and

acres: All

You be not may in for pre-consultation

area, aware

parts

this

of the with

planning

zoning

question

Storri ngton ;bill

If you tax bill. 040-050,

Reason why comply: you cant could for example, because be, that is already too close to impossible because a of steep

Roads: Municipally maintained that residents maintain themselves and that are property generally

other

shared

roads

you

(not

looked

words, seeking or that

after

0&7

the but

can you a variance developing

why

driveways, private others). with

are

are the water, embankment.

and

completed. property

meet add

Township; lanes

further

not to

to than

this

that

provi de

private

within bu ild in gre the q on a to ui n th from re e d

you are asking 25 rather m a structure of an accessory be

your staff.

must

Extent This is asking what of Relief: question it could be that asking are example, to you or that you are asking increase the to height or that you are seeking a variance to construct than the principal building.

for

zoning: you come

depth,

—

sep ara post te» al!

variance owner Alll ’s

Townships. on your numbers are your district

during: appear

V?A&RI %NlCE

Concession and Lot Numbers: are check your not tax if you sure, Street Number: Your civic address civic number has been not if a space blank. Name of Road/Street: This question applies whether or you are not a public road. Reference Plan No: has been surveyed, it will have If your property one or more on that has been surveyed, not parts plan. If your property blank. Roll No: This is the number beginning appears on with which ‘1029’ take time look it up before submitting to the application.

with if the

former

your behalf should

live with

Fornn

IMI|NlOR

eve-n lli they complete

IVHVFIOI’‘Wariance

APPLICATIIDINV PL13 1930, c.

this in section, rnai ng azd-dress,

FRONTENMNC Act, R..S.O.

someone and phone

front

Guide must

S()Ul"IT’I-I

Planning

owners should

the Subject n of Land: District: The Districts are the same as the the roll number (the long number beginning or your 020 district is 010, 030, Bedford; Loughborough: numbers are 060 if the numbers are your district is Portland. 080,

wish name, .

mark, mark, lot line

Current when

variance water water

Frontage,

Descrip

You may person’s authorization

names all of address(es) the

The and

TOVWNSHIP

Page 61 of 113

Parking

Description re structu the from

of existing may find actually

Demolition: instances,

are you information

Description

Proposed question

Length years,

Water their

are

“yes”

structures: —Thi

of it.

although because

Structure: under

that, do it

in a

lake.

most

uses:

the

cases

For

—

the

not

take

e.g.

are

answer

example,

are

you

answer walls did

You deck

must

structures

you

the

all! complete your dwelling,

sections please

lrand

only

NIIINKOIK

property

can

recreational

For]?

amended

screened

part

permit

will

has

sure,

the

private

land

provide

possession

each a

dwelling,

new

septic development and

ANYTHING garages,

must

co ns tr uc t

be deck,

property, systems.

add

the

of thi s descri be

now,

access

VARIAN CE

your

the

well,

been

but

used

best

for

waterfront

residential

increase An a involve

estimate.

some

property?

this question. would porch

the building from depart height accom be Iishedment. cannot the beginning to at the Committee permission add on your to to re si it clear that there is demolition invo de lved . nci you proposing raise the building to e,

build decks,

ALL proposed addition to

additions,

planning

words,

If you

Please with

other

ition

vacant

relevant

answer this to be the same question will currently and you are planning vacant, section 10 would be recreational “vacant in be “residential”

only

APPLICATMCINV PL13 c.

1 990,

business,

R..S.O.

requires or increase made clear not granted are you have made not you ad is

buildings

retail

structures: Ilf there

you are includes

When buildings:

months?

existing

acquired:

demo

If this

All proposed

walls.

Act,

FR()NITEN\A.C

question

of new construction: proposing to construct columns. in separate

use in

and

ANY

residential.

’l|‘hix’s

Generally, the land be to described section 13 would

Uses: example,

supply: from water

20)Date

land

19)Date

space.

It’ there “yes”.

e.g;.

Do,ckix’n.g|:

SOLJVITPII Pfarnningr

of buildings on your property. residence.

Uses:

and

Development: include anything

basement

18)Uses would

17)Raising

but for if, then the described

Proposed

Buildings: question

Existing

water.

‘ITC)MVrN‘SH|I\P

Page 62 of 113

speci?c

this as has

to before

been

appointed.

commissioners,

done

Agreement

time

All

owners

lndemnify: submitting

Has there property. the zoning

probably If you

minor

provide

for

been

sign the application,

front

variance be aware

severance this

FOR

system,

amended

for

consent

constructed

any

can

commissioner application

of owner,

granted

but

(severance)

deal!

th e

m a y with

VARIA NICE

there

MIlNlOrR

subdivision or information)

sewage

application

have

private

APPLICATION P_13 1990, C.

signed Must be the applica ion, must sign the

ever been you will by-law.

that

currently

ditches

VVI

FRONTEMAC R_S.C). Act,

application can help

there

is a current number. (Staff

consent:

etc.?

the

answer

SOUTH Planning

oath s of signed of front

on the property? other spe I for are a new the seller p w r you o b yes: there has been a previous If If variance granted on the property, a number application and what if known, the details of were. the variance b l SKETCH: We cannot stress enough the of a importance detailed, accurate, y sketch. You do not necessarily need with to contract a professional to but sketches that are drawn not to do show not dimensions and scale, neatly not drawn (PLEASE USE RULER). be A not will accepted.

Minor

If there the file

cases there

variance: owner the of a variance to aware of this.

yes: If indicate

most

Are drainage,

Application for the property?

for

Drainage: natural

Septic:

TOMVMSHIDP

Inset Map Inset Map

CON 9 NPT LOT 1

MC CO NV IL

ke La lton

NE LA

Kn ow

E VERE T

HOLLEFORD ROAD

REDMOND ROAD

PL-ZNA-2023-0104 (ASSELSTINE)

3772 NEW MORIN RD

3572 HOLLEFORD ROAD Legend Subject Property Provincially Significant Wetland Wetland Wooded Area HOLLEFORD ROAD

3849 HOLLEFORD RD

Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity Lake Trout Lake - Not at Capacity Non-Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity Township Boundary Road 3572 HOLLEFORD RD

Railway

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © King’s Printer for Ontario, 2022.

Page 63 of 113

While the County makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Scale: 1:1,000

40 m

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

Date: 2023-08-21

Page 64 of 113

Page 65 of 113

Page 66 of 113

Page 67 of 113 16’-5 1/3“ (5.00 rn)

14’—21/4” (4.32 rn) 1/8" (5‘0D m)

Page 68 of 113

To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: October 12, 2023 Minor Variance Application (S. 45(1) of Planning Act) Subject: PL-ZNA-2023-0104, Asselstine, 3572 Holleford Road, Loughborough District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of this application for zoning relief for two storage sheds, subject to conditions, as this application meets the four tests of a minor variance outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Background The applications seek zoning relief for one proposed accessory structure and one existing accessory structure built without the necessary planning approvals. The proposed zoning relief would permit both structures to be setback 6.5m from the front lot line. Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Rural Zoning Relief Requested Section 7.3.2 – To permit two accessory structures to be setback 6.5m from the front lot line, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 20m. Related Applications The lands are not subject to any additional applications under the Planning Act.

Discussion Property Description The subject property is a lot of record measuring approximately 2Ac with 76m of frontage on Holleford Road. The property contains an existing 400sqm single dwelling, a swimming pool and detached accessory structure (12.2sqm storage shed). Existing development is www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 69 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZNA-2023-0104, Asselstine, 3572 Holleford Road, Loughborough District

concentrated to two area – the middle portion where the dwelling is situated, and the northwest corner where the accessory structure is situated. Regarding topography, the property is relatively flat and is elevated several meters from the travelled portion of Holleford Road. A majority of the subject property is cleared of trees, with the exception of the area adjacent to the northern lot line, which is well vegetated. Finally, the surrounding area is sparsely developed, and is characterized by similar rural residential developments and some rural agricultural uses. Summary of Proposal The proposal seeks relief from Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 to permit reduced setbacks for two accessory structures. The proposal would recognize the existing 12.2sqm (132sqft) storage shed, which is setback 6.5m from the front lot line. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to construct a 66.8sqm (720sqft) detached storage building that would be setback 6.5m from the front lot line. Both accessory structures would occupy space in the northwest corner of the property and will extend from the existing driveway. With the exception of the minimum front yard setback, both structures would comply with the requirements of the Zoning By-law. Agency Comments Public Services staff reviewed the proposal in light of the reduced front yard setback and its potential effect on Holleford Road. They had no objection to the approval of the application. Public Comments No comments were received from the public at the time of the writing of this report. Planning Analysis The proposal needs to be assessed against the four tests of a minor variance outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. It is the opinion of Planning staff that the proposal meets the four tests as explained below. Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The variance would recognize an existing non-compliant storage shed and facilitate the construction of a new storage building on lands designated Rural on Schedule A of the Township Official Plan. The type and amount of development on rural lands must maintain the rural character, natural heritage, and cultural landscape in the Township. The proposed storage shed is accessory to the permitted residential use of the property.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 70 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZNA-2023-0104, Asselstine, 3572 Holleford Road, Loughborough District

It is the opinion of Township Planning staff that the proposed variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan, specifically the policies related to rural residential development. Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? An accessory structure is a permitted use with the RU zone. The proposed storage shed, and building comply with all requirements of the Zoning By-law except the minimum setback from the front lot line. Section 7.3.2 of the Zoning By-law requires accessory structures be setback a minimum 20m from the front lot line, whereas the proposed accessory structures are to be setback 6.5m. The purpose of this setback is to avoid and overdeveloped appearance near roadways and to ensure the rural character of the area is maintained. 20m is also the minimum distance that a principal building (like a house) must be from the front lot line. Setback 6.5m from the front lot line, the accessory structures are unlikely to negatively impact the rural character of the surrounding area for the following reasons. The proposed location has been selected to maximize the functionality of each structure. For example, the proposed location is a natural extension from the existing driveway and features compacted soil to accommodate the construction of a slab-on-grade floor. Additionally, the proposed location has the benefit of being screened from the road by tree cover and a change in elevation. As such, it is the opinion of Township Planning Staff that the proposed variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Is the requested variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure in question? The requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The proposed location is desirable because it extends naturally from the existing driveway, is located on compact soil, and will provide natural run-off as a localized highpoint. The proposed location is also well screened from Holleford Road by existing trees and a change in elevation. Therefore, Township Planning staff interpret the proposed 6.5m setback as appropriate. Is the variance minor? The requested variance is minor as it maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Further, the requested variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands. When considering the minimal size of both structures and their use as storage sheds, it is unlike that a 6.5m front yard setback would result in negative impacts or alter the rural character of the surrounding area.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 71 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZNA-2023-0104, Asselstine, 3572 Holleford Road, Loughborough District

Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve minor variance application PL-ZNA-2023-0104 for 3572 Holleford Road, subject to the following conditions.

The minor variance is for two storage sheds with area values of 12.2sqm (132sqft) and 66.8sqm (720sqft). The minimum front yard setback for both structures is permitted to be 6.5m. The location of both accessory structures must be generally consistent with the sketch submitted by the applicant.
A building permit is required for the proposed 66.8sqm (720sqft) storage shed. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
Minor variance PL-ZNA-2023-0104 is applicable only to Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws. Report Prepared By: Noah Perron, Planner Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 72 of 113

Page 73 of 113

Rideau

Quinte

Cataraqui

Township Minor Minor Minor system

Requirements

under a zoning

is a Section by—law

June,

Committee eight of 45 the of Planning or permission under

Updated

FRONTENAC

persons

appointed 1990, alter to

VARIANCE 45(2))

2023

(s.

MINOR

SOUTH

Authority

Conservation

Valley

permit

that a Fee Authority the applicable

Act

R.S.O.

Authority

Review a new

Conservation

Class

be for provided (where applicable)

Township to when submitting Authority, are to

the

sewage

app

submitted

review

Secretary—

e sewage cation ( Se with the pa rat e

dable

a byTreasurer non card or —cheq refun ue

the

PIanning:AgpIication

copy of this application be filed with together with the accompanied sketch, below or by in cash. debit card, credit Frontenac.

South Frontenac Only I/l/ITH Performance combination in with than a Class system A

Region

Variance Variance Variance other

It is required Conservation payable to

without

Type:

It is that one required (1) Committee of Adjustment, accordance with the chart the Township to of South

Application 1-3 Variances Variances 4+ building After

Application

used

lands

The

The that

Adjustment

FOR PERMISSION

TOVVNSHIP

APPLICATION

by Town Chapter ship 45(2) s. a legal n o n Committee may Zoning By—law vary provisions the Committee provided ~ the variance: co nf Is desirable the for appropriate or use development the of building or or land, s t Maintains the general intent and purpose the of Official Plan. m r l/laintains the general intent and of the purpose Zoning By—Iaw. in u is minor gc nature in t Committee enlarge may grant permission to or extend u a or structure alt where err building or land, any on the day the structure, by-law was passe e for a prohibited purpose by d, the by-law.

The Committee Committee is minor variance of formed from

FR%}‘.I.JENAc ..“2‘—‘::

A‘

Page 74 of 113

Please

additional

READ

Committee

Personal

boards,

Treasurer 376-3027

questions

ITEM

and

for

Act,

CAREFULLY

R.$.O.

FRONTENAC

consultation fees prior

SOUTH Planning

any

on this application construction.

APPLICATION P.13 1990, C. as

only;

FOR amended

these

IVIINOR

agencies

VARIAN CE

Commissions, regarding of the ext.2224).

requested be used

Information

herein is under the required Planning Act, the Committee of Adjustment/Land Division the above referenced application. and be made may Agencies Authorities, and Persons having an interest the collection of this information should be directed Committee Adjustment of (P.O. Box Sydenham, 100, Ont.,

Personal information This information will of purpose review’ng

Collection

time to important application regard, drafting

THIS

are

shall a sketch showing provide the dimensions the of subje as outlined Question ct sh 29 of in the application. The sketch and scaled either o in or Metric measures. Imperial This sketch, ul is Form, the basis for the analysis of the Minor Variance d of Adjustment. It is strongly recommended that the applicant sp carefully and thoroughly assemble the data and transfer the data en d that the sketch be drawn with accurate dimensions and mea which does not include the above information may required not sure men the may applicant wish secure to the assistance of a person who ts. of such sketches. guide A to answering the application is questions

Each applicant abutting lands dimensioned the Application

PLEASE

Note: These fees permit applications

TOVVNSHIP

Page 75 of 113

Page 76 of 113

4 subject

the

are

the

Please indicate (Le, residence,

subject be to public

area

the

and

the

there shed, I:I

’? f?

—

EXISTING

buildings

(‘cs+c1@/2.

land?

only, please distance

maintained

the

By—law:

with

Area:

Z4 comply

P.13

Frontage

land.

APPLICATION

1990,

Zoning

is by water approximate

D~’¢es

any

‘

the

subject

municipally

subject

the

are etc‘)

Prbpa/44

uses

used road.

property

Lone

road‘?

front

04/LV‘/3

cannot

/‘é?z/r-(4 use

from

land:

/30

FRONTENAC Act, R.S.O.

relief

subject

@1417;

IE/<’es

whether garage,

existing

/L;/A

the or

QC(\e

used nearest

property

the

and

SOUTH Planning

proposed

5:4

extent

maintained

Road/Lane:

privately

®$\9

the

S<}o'3e<\cu\

What

why

and

rafki.

zoning

water):

depth

b(r3§z(na.,_;»,é~

reason

nature

#91

current

If access facilities and the

Name

Does

The

Depth:

(on

frontage(s),

Frontage

The

TOVVNSHIP

the facilities

structures

indicate these

road?

NIINOR

road/lane):

FOR amended

provisions

?é

(on

Zo ni ng

the

parking fro m

Yes

the

VARIAN CE

Page 77 of 113

Lot

frorn

14.Are

13.The

any be

€90

uses

building(s) built the on

%k3r<:n\

proposed

one

High

story)

Building

Line

frprn

Line

fr_om

Area

two

ctu

from

Vvater Mark (If applicable)

Setback

Dimensions Floor

slol’Y

indicate

Setback Side Lot

Setback Rear

FrontLotLine

Height

(Also

answer

of Stru residence)

the

Setback

Type (E.g.

TOVVNSHIP

1 1

SOUTH

yes,

Planning

the

subject

2-11

IV)

Yes

land?

structure(s),

subject

Vmpe??

:3,

3&y

6 39¢

land:

/vbafhk‘

QQ3 £6

(3)

structure

P.13

VNO

additions

existing

%;2,

—7‘&,(/C

o?eu

/:97

gay’

/n/zg?as

mdpge

(1,,/,1

O23

CYSKIJ

(

building

APPLICATION

1990,

FOR amended

indicate:

NIINOR

VARIAN CE

building(s)

h,‘

0&0

@171}

IV’

U I O)

I M

structure(s),

ae— Lz&o / /

GSCSLVQESQ, /at 4&4/JL

(2)

EACH

FRONTENAC R.S.O. Act, for

\2§5\‘<j\Q(\gQ

(1)

item

Page 78 of 113

If the

story

story)

your

If yes,

item

please

plans

is yes,

SOUTH Planning

,__/

5/,“

/IJ Q’ Q5 J

5 3 .9 I 84-’) 7-’ 9

provide

/01

each

Act,

(2)

proposed

R.S.O.

FRONTENAC

details:

any

DEMOLITION

on relate

mark

existing

building.

and

addition,

FOR amended

a private be will the to

(3)

VARIAN CE

structure

NIINOR

Yes

the setback lane, the same. CONSTRUCTIO NEW N

building

structures?

APPLICATION c. P.13 1990,

is on property waterfront, setback from high the water required in this question total size the of completed

/‘/%]

include

for

5ova§%,¢¢5,

6 17%

(

(1)

subject If the lot line and the 2) The dimensions and NOT the to

one

Setback from High Water Mark (If applicable)

NOTES:

Line

from

Line

from

from Line

Building

tvvo

Outside

indicate

Dirnensions Building/Structure

(Also

Lot

Setback Side

Height

Lot

Rear

Setback

Front

answer

Structure residence)

Setback

(E.g.

Type

TOVVNSHIP

Page 79 of 113

length

21.The

Indicate

‘~\

storm

(

KID

privy,

body.

operated

of that

drainage

CXVQ

was

the

provided owned

fixtures

bedrooms

sewers,

the

ditches.

T&OK

owned

provided

existing

owner:

swales

the subject operated

other

land individual

the

Yes

means?

and

o p lak e, e r a t e a publicly od communal w or ne d

owned well,

E ’

VARIAN CE

subject

MINOR

continued:

publicly communal

a or

land

FOR

amended

have

structure?

constructed

land individual

subject

were

current

encroach

to and

the subject operated

structures

uses

and

disposal privately a

c'\ 03

APPLICATION c. P.13 1990,

development?

R.S.C>.

or structure septic system?

and

existing

space

acquired

living

plumbing

number

addition existing

RAISING

Act,

FRONTENAC

proposed

details:

the

L\J€\

provided

SOUTH

Planning

buildings

land

whether sewage sewage system, means: other

the the

water privately

means:

time

C$\€/

other

system.

water

existing

subject

e*z42_¢/~=

the

Q0/9

the

Will

Increase

(0) (d)

Increase

(b)

uses

provide

Increase

the

include

(a)

whether

date

20.The

Indicate

date

plans please

are

your

yes,

What

‘l9.The

TOVVNSHIP

Page 80 of 113

**Note’

location of township location

and

The

nearest

The

all

line

abutting

lot

reference

distances to importance

property

The and

should

to on—site IS varied,

river distance

natural subject

abutting REQUIRED be prepared

and

Show

(neighbours) all the

the

file

subject l crossing.

owners’ fields and wells, septic be shown. The SKETCH is as carefully, neatly and accurately to

THE

a n d

of rn

the subje ct buildings, wetlands, the applicant’s

railway

the

location

subject

the

VARIAN CE

application

the

TOP

including

THE

between bridge or

land

the

been

number

under

IVIINOR

and artificial features land. Examples include or stream banks, barns, of these features from

lands.

i.e. distance such as a

subject

FOR

amended

application

ever

number

ARROVV

following:

the

land has Variance).

give

APPLICATION P.13 C.

1990,

subject

NORTH

landrnar

point..

ditches.

showing

give

subject (Minor

please

is Consent.

land

the Act

please

HAVE

yes,

FRONTENAC R.S.O. Act,

and dimensions buildings.

MUST

submitted

whether Planning

8,4,

subject

The approximate location the land that is adjacent drainage watercourses, wells and tanks. septic lines.

boundaries proposed

The

the

Q//?e

indicate the of

item

SKETCH

must

Yes

SOUTH

Planning

Subdivision

question

THE

SKETCH

answer If the the application.

If known, please under Section

Yes

whether Plan of

answer to application.

indicate of a

If the of the

Please approval

TOVVNSHIP

Page 81 of 113

Page 82 of 113

ran

into

also

Frontenac

the

this with

Jeff

Please

copies.

Sleeth

and

contact

included

building canada

(email

letter

attached)

was

the

the one

but

lake

the

Jen nife r

(attached).

Canada

pernlit?ng that they

would

(parks

boathouse.

June

for their neighbour

permit

old

into

a aesthetics from our

falling

construction

granted and

was

our

location

elevation

and

since same

requested

size,

permit

2022,

adjustment

and

with

Jennifer

will be

Spronck

questions

pictures

any

the

old

boathouse

before

was

demolished.

i v e

much bigger than in years as such we would like past, to enlarge e normal sized 2 boats, by building a 2-slip boathouse. A average 17 end to including the engine and about feet its plus ro 7 at est, w sides. Also needed is an and area walkway either entrance between o m are attached to Parks Canada permit and be happy g l would to

are

the

boats.

maximum

reconstruction

on Parks

for

Sized

fall

for

sleeth

following. The original boathouse was approximately 20x24. the water covering the back end of the (east boat side) that l effectively e for to account bigger boats. Secondly there was an exterior walkway on the the I misinterpreted as such the real interpretation de?nition of ”footprI’rlt’? t under area the so effectively 20x24 and my assumption was overhang 24+ roo?

off

Further,

lvlodern day boats building to accommodate approximately feet end 20 door and bumpers on the around. Engineers drawings

2o+walkway_

canada

boathouse

request

boathouse

formal

rebuild the rnodern 2

the

regulations

difficulties above

Signed

concern:

parks

received.

clear

reconstruction.

has

Proposal

overhang boathouse along length. its

an the

CRCA

its

which

applied

canada

accommodate

size

this

Demolished

project:

may

Scope

whom

Please

Jeff

B ATTE R SEA ROAD

L HI

P L A CE ROAD

JOES E LAN

RN BU

Dog Lake

EE ROAD RMSB

PL-ZNA-2023-0108 (SLEETH)

N S TREE NGTO T E LLI

RY I

RO AD

Inset Inset Map Map

Cranberry Lake

122 OSBORNE LANE

68 APPLEJACK LANE

Legend Subject Property Provincially Significant Wetland Wetland Wooded Area 122 OSBORNE LANE

Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity Lake Trout Lake - Not at Capacity Non-Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity Township Boundary Road Railway

Dog Lake

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © King’s Printer for Ontario, 2022.

Page 83 of 113

Scale: 1:500 0

20 m

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

Date: 2023-09-05

Page 84 of 113

Page 85 of 113

Ref.No.:23—Ol37

Enclosure

No.

Notes: Secure premises at all times. All work as per O.B.C. 2012 as amended. Obtain all necessary permits, lockouts etc.. Shore as necessary. Contractor to confirm all measurements. steel CSA G40.21 44W Welding to CSA W55 Electrodes CSA W48 —E70, <Hl7 Bolts shall comform to ASTM A325 or A490 Lumber grade S,P.F No. 1/2 Plywood to CSA 0151 LePage PL Premium or approved equivalent.

Structural

Adhesive

Canadian

Flashing and roofing details per Association Roofing Contractors Manual Roofing Specifications

Make good all areas

affected

by work.

mmtam

CONCORD ENGINEERING 754 Baker Crescent, Ontario Kingston,

Project:

Boathouse

2nd Floor K7M 6136

Page 86 of 113

Left Side

Dr°Wl”9’

Elevations

Client

Mr‘ Jeff

Designer:

634-4357 $613; 613 634-4353

concorde?kosmet

Design

122 Osbourne

Battersea,

Tel: Fax: E-mail:

Lane

Ontario

Sleeth

Dwn by: R00

Date: 14—Aug—23

Ref.No.:23—O137

Enclosure

No.

Pile Foundation

5m x 5s.‘ HSS w/25Mbar 3’ fillet weld stitched (Q to side

using and embedded min. 15’ into sound bedrock. (see Detail Drawing 4/4)

150x22 (W6x15 Steel Beam Steel

Beam

Sslx

Steel Beams to be Iiel welded to steel plate. see Detail Dra

Beam Foundakion

Layout

CONCORD ENGINEERING 764 Baker Crescent, Kingston, Ontario

Project:

Boakhouse

2nd Floor K7M 6P6

Page 87 of 113

D’0Wi“9’> Foundation C?enti

Designer:

Mr. Jeff

634-4357 £613; 613 634-4358 concox-de@kos.net

Design

122 Osbourne Battersea,

Tel: Fax: E-mail:

Lane

Ontario and

Beam

Layout

Sleeth

Dwn by: R90

Date: 14~~Aug~~23

Ref.No.: 23-0137

Enclosure No. 1 Drawing No. 3 7

‘x’ bracing to be Held welded to 5—}§e x 31; Piles/‘w’ sections

underside

of cross

and beams

(see Detail)

Steel cross beams to be ?eld welded in w6xI5 beams (see Detail drawing 4/4)

Cross

Beam

Layout

Bracing Layout

CONCORD ENGINEERING 764 Baker Crescent, Ontario Kingston,

Project:

2nd ](7M

Boathouse

Page 88 of 113

Drawing:

Cross

Designer:

2613 613

634-4357 634-4353

concorde@kos.net

Lane

Ontario

Beam

Mr. Jeff

Tel: Fax: E-mail:

Design

122 Osbourne

Bottersea,

Floor 6176

&: ‘><’ Bracing

Layout

Sleeth

Dwn by: R90

Date: 14-Aug-23

Ref.No.:23—O137

Enclosure No. 1 Drawing No. 4 7

2x4 PT Decking

PT Joist

4x4

24’’

L3><3><)2” clips

C4-><7.25 (C100)<11) @36’’

2><6"(38><184mm) PT Nailer bolted to W6><15 (W150><22) Using

carriage

bolt

w/ nuts

and

washers

staggered

o.c

W6><15 (w15ox22)“’

6}’2"><6}’2"><5%5" (165><165><8mm)Steel

%:—.: ,%cp

P|ate$"

\l_<Cp

2.,X2..X%,. ‘X’ Bracing

‘*-syfca

4_2—Stitch

w/ each

5m," HSS

weld to HSS min. 1" long welds

4" cc

side

Sound

‘*—#a

H (Ti i‘:‘1_ii @

Bedrock

CONCORD

(25M) Bar Embedded

min. 36"

ENGINEERING 764 Baker Crescent, Kingston, Ontario

Project:

Boathouse

2nd Floor K7M SP6

Page 89 of 113

Foundation

Detail

concol-de®kos.net

Design

122 Osbourne

Batterseci,

634-4357 €613; 613 634-4353

I-‘ax; E-mail:

Lane

Ontario

DV0Wi"‘95Section C“eni=

Designer:

Mr. Jeff

Sleeth

Dwn by: RDO

Date: 17——Feb—23

Enclosure No. 1 No. 5 7 ‘rawing

4-x4 PT Jois

Joist to be attached to L3x3x74" brackets using %" carriage bolts with nuts ond washers (see Detail Drawing 4/4)

Floor Framing

Layout

Wall Framing

Layout

CONCORD ENGINEERING 764 Baker Crescent, Ontario Kingston,

Project:

Boakhouse

2nd Floor K7M 6P6

concorde@kos.net

Page 90 of 113

Lane

Ontario

Drawing?

Framing

Layout

C?ent

Mr. Jeff

Sleeth

Designer:

634-4357 E613; 613 634-4353

Design

122 Osbourne

Battersea,

Tel: Fax: E-mail:

Dwn by: RDO

Date: 14-Aug-23

Ref.No.: 23—Ol37

Enclosure No. 1 Drawing No.6 7

Shore

End Bracket

Arrangement

in Plan

:l 2 X 10 W h

. 2x6 decking .

5’ d 55

L3 x3

X3" long brackets

Fasten

to 4x4 with

flush

M x 5

with outside edge of channel log bolt w/washer

2x10 both

2x6 sill plate 2x4 bottom nailer 1l"¢>carriage bolt ©36"o/c

L3 X3 X3" long brackets flush with outside edge at channel Fasten to 4x4 with 3%:x 3" log bolt w/washer

sides

2x4 top and

5% carriage

bottom both sides bait @36"o/c

Crossbeam Details 2 center crass beams

pmme

—

Details Crossbeam 1, 3 & 12 End beams —

EbD:I

—~

Typical Bracket Arrangement

2x6

2x10

both

sades—/

Splice

in Plan

L3 x3 xi" x3" long brackets staggered Fasten to 4x4 with §”¢ x 3’’ log bolt

decking

on channel

——

Bracket Arrangement

——

in Plan L3 x3 Fasten

typ.

x1"x8" Iang brackets centered on channel to 4x4 with 3% x 3" lug bolt w/washer

w/washer

04 *7

‘RWGXI5 2x4 tap and bottom yin carriage bolt @36"o/c

pro?le

Details Crossbeam 4, 6 through 8. 10 and

Profile C’°55be°m

5 6c 9-

Peiuils SplICS Location

Stringer

CONCORD "

ENGINEERING 764 Baker Crescent, Kingston, Ontario

Project:

Boathouse

2nd Floor K7M 6P6

concorde@kas.net.

Page 91 of 113

Lane

Ontario

Drawin

Middle Stringer

Client

Mr. Jeff

Designer:

634-4357 £8l3g 613 634-4353

Design

122 Osbourne

Battersea,

Tel: Fax: E—mail:

Framing

Details

Sleeth

Dwn by: RDO

Chd

by:

Date: l7—Feb—23

Ref.No.:23—Ol37

Enclosure No. 1 Drawing No. 7 7

26 Go. pre—finished steel roofing Underloyment per roofing monufocturer’s %”plywood sheathing with l-l—clips wood trusses Pre—engineered

Aluminium

2x4

soffit

ond

recommendotions

foscio

6”o/c

OSB sheothing 115”

Air borrier Siding

2”—nomino|

p.t.

wood

deck

2x6 sill plote %”§Z5 corrioge bolt

stoggered

@24”o/c

CONCORD

—-_-

ENGINEERING

\2xlO

764 Baker Crescent, Kingston, Ontario

Project:

Page 92 of 113

2><4 bottom corrioge 3975

noiler bolt @48”o/c

Boathouse

2nd Floor K7M 6P6

Tel: Fax: E—mail:

(nag E613

634-4357 634-4353

concorde@kos.nel.

Design

122 Osboumetone Botterseo,

Ontario

Drowingr

Building Section

Client

Mr. Jeff

Sleeth

Dwn by: R00

Chd by:

Dale: 21—Feb—23

Page 93 of 113

Exterior Walkway

Page 94 of 113

North Foundation

Page 95 of 113

Side View with Overhang

Page 96 of 113

Page 97 of 113

Page 98 of 113

l~lvl

during

The

Dog

signed:

Prinl

has

or permi

and

coidwater a window. timing occurring from

this

must

the

off

front

this

if the shall

canal.

deta

start

canal

all

tor

the

posted

Page

only

work

water

any

being

tor

the

this or

pro/ect

and

ons

shall

and

site

herora,

app June

and

met of

the not

all

work

year.

the

other other

stop

and

start

dry.

create

Canada‘

shai

March

not

740

ma y

23- 0 2°23

in~waI.er

the

agent

conditions the to area

extend fronting

situation.

Appendix prior

site

each

work does

between

projects

does

«‘1

not

place

to restricts

within

project.

project

compliance

this

the

bed in undertakinq.

aggrova

returned

duration

location

and the required work area.

potential

are

take

worked ice removal the into

other

the

window.

vlsitiie of

during

which

timing

Date:

regarding

once

of desc

June

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

the proponents authorized owner(s), this permit.

vis t the determining

required

proposed

ons

until dated

contained work Documentation conditions site con?rm

window.

met

condit contacted

above

and allow

area

Staff

duration

times

window ng This coidwater betvveen octoliier

site

may of

proposal of the

cond

property

conditions

the

respc-nsibi

the on

effect and

ned

PERMIT

the

and of the

purpose the permit.

canal

Rideau

this

for

are timing

force l=a

representation

propeny

not

bottom

the

Canada

conditions, year.

work

any

does

the

below

exemption

the

that Rideau

this

apove

22.2%..

the

window

and

s or

and

level

Parks

solid

tie

s the includes

Rldeau

the

shall waterfront

that it ch wh implement

set

that construction

full hs

acceptance

me srn the

n ng

out

accurate

that

come

advance of work.

permit

entrance

page

this

team

not

and

agrees

.::’“a:.‘:‘.’:.::::.:L“=’*°""‘

conditions following the ccildwater rlsh

during

fair

after conditions

fish work

water

ice

water

projects

222:…

Lake

(inclusive)

The The open

rhls timing potential properties

a days

and

Narne:

last

of the within fonlvarded

any time immediately

.iune

Regardless

be work.

either

any

properties

The

shoreline

shall any

are

applicant

copy

Project.

does

canal

it is acknowledged management contractors and

with

warmwater

taken

ackncwledqrnent

commencement

and

proceed

permit

Rideau

Notice

and permit

the shall

This

the

NOTE:

. .

Appendix

::::,%r.§i:zi’“”"°“i’

Page 99 of 113

I-i-I

the

t: htt

boathouse

outside

sketches

and

through on.

Parks.

Please o.ca/

with

the

installed

BOATHOUSE

shall submitted

s://www.ontar

for SAR consultation with check eIhaw-

the

permit

OVER

for

the

at outside

LAKEBED

location and ication app

shown

dimensions

and

of?ce

ered—s

local

lands

further

identified pages

species

Act

three

the

under

Risk

eight

drawings

and

must

thi s

740 0 2°

impacted

non.federai direction ermit-or-

Environment, for

ecies—act-

located

provincial

and waters potentially

June

8520-0601

species

AW°Ve“

NO.

areas applicable

Endangered

Ministry

the

components

of (or to

presence

PERMIT

site project are subject

poten

under

project

lands

the

the ontario your with et-endan

THE

permitting

non—federal

Furthermore.

application,

dicate your

Portions

….aan..a.t…a

::=“e:;:*.:2i::.:i”°“i‘

over

Darts

all

the

those

excavated

Federal

and

the the

lnsta future

Provincial

responsibility

2::.°:.,..

involving

this

the

cases

that

back

the

local

approved

out

ft.

from

the

such

r r i

th e

ft.

the

facilitate modification

requirements

Canada

the

structure

responsibility

sq. any The n. cries the

shoreline.

movement.

for

from

1515 fas filling shoreline

lakebed open the natural

meets work Township/Municipality.

notifications

applicant’s

lskebed.

minimum

current

the Rock frorn the

over

unobstructed

controlled the upper or watercourse, in be and must greater. the water. re—erlKsring is

the (upland from any

over

whichever entering

the

set area rt.

s the compliance

including

projection

shall

shore least agency. from

its

the structure of wood untreated members. wooden of

the shall be obtained not as as possible close allow for a[ong—shc)re 3 m area.

portion

piles,

Page

to ensure agencies

material

another

near

and

lakebed

built

and

width

upland

atlon

over the boundary

the constructed

debris)

the

be to required

must be placed with requirements prevent the dredged

Sinks…

other

requirements.

and

than

shall

supporting

constructed

shore

structure

cribs

the

silta

less

boathouse property

yard

material

the e

level) to

all

the

for cribs of

used the

not (free

along be no

while

applicant’s

proiects

removal

For

accordance stabilized

and Any navigation

nearest

All

there

span shall

clean

shall be

docks,

shall lakebed. open

openings

are

if cribs attached

minimum of of the total that 50% length of structures any extend supporting shoreline (lake ward of the upper controlled shall be navigation level) clear, open The maximum of the iekebed footprint supporting structures on spans.

dock or a 26 ft.

The

dimensions of the the attached walkway structure including roof any cribs, eves. lake:-ed upper (lake must the ward from the controlled fit within navigation level) ft. area the shoreline. Attached rectangular immediately adjacent to walkways docks installed immediately must at or or be above the waterline. Attached docks walkways s ft. in total shall exceed width and 5 ft. width not the the boathouse wall. from outs e of in Ncl decks are permitted. The the oi double ched roofs shall or being peak hipped roofline. no more be than above the controlled level. Flat allowed. na atton roofs are not 1 5 ft. upper sery No ces are um na ion to other than permitted. Exterior electricity wi designed I be pollution. and colours with m nimize Materials that blend the light in surrounding landscape used. boathouse have to two water. w A may up towards the Parks Canada ll be openings that materials other than cedar be suggests asphalt shingles shingles or (e,g., steel) used, where possible, as a roofing to to enter material reduce the potential for asphalt contaminant into the maximum boathouse boat lot. water body. of one or permitted A port per is

permit.

The and

CONDITIONS

authoriza

vis

requirement

located

areas

records

”°"°“°’

jurisdiction.

Canada’s terrestrial

legislation.

project),

conservation

lands, determined

the by rnuriicipe

Parks the in

Canada’s

Parks

NOTE

(SAR)

::::i:::§i.:i‘ Darkscar\s¢a.9C.ci

Page 100 of 113

Iii-I

ant

will

provided

pal

Turbidity

““5 Canada

suspended

later

,—/

shall

for

the

be other

this

appropriate

implemented

permit

Building

du g

any

Ajuax

at,

from

all

the

debris

reports

Ca1'1ad’a’i

an y

site.

shall

your

74 20 23v DD

control levels turbidity implemented during place until all

/-mar

to be

:0‘

vvork shall

work and removed

inspections

contact

June

8520-0601

APF”°ve=*

NO.

if required.

of the to be

remain

shall

measures, Tnese

expires.

well

code

PERMIT

upon completion and land, on the

this

structure

ontario

date

condition water in the minimum.

tidy

than

the

information.

in sedimentation. settled.

under

::=~c:i:’.?.::.”.;::’*"°"°’

obtained

permit for

and neat inorganic a practical

curtains, result may have

measures

in a and

Eifsas

‘Z

that sediments

control work

required. in-water

sediment

kept

left

building to this

The site is to be bolh waste. organic is to be Turbidity

mun

permits of?ce no

obtain

Township/l/Iurllclpalily

appl

All

The local

::::,:r;;?.2a’~a‘W’

Page 101 of 113

luv-I

2:’::.=a

3:’::..a

Page

n-I

PERMIT

Ca11ad’:‘1’

CONCORD

8520-0801740!) Approved June

NO.

20 23

Page 102 of 113

Ialvl 2:’r.":¢.a

um.

Rldeau Hvslnnc size

Canal

Na?anm QCJIS

cu?

<c..,…-;

pan:scarvada.gc.ca

..‘

5»

Nalinnal

-;.-

Hwslanqua Lieu du CanaI—RIdeau

PERMIT

8:’..°:aa

~.»,-.»..-

(..s,…,,.m,,

Page

rmma.u..,..

wens

.._,..—

Detu?

.w.,a.m—

1’”..""‘.’:’. ‘ii’. ;.-

Canad’éI

June

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

‘;_<t%Sa

JL’..”:’.".’ ’:£’.l.‘35”£3‘.”‘£$’ ..’.,°.”..‘.‘..“2..¥‘.“.".‘.3.".‘.‘z’.‘5”’..’2’\

narkscanaaa

0 2 3

74 2 00

Page 103 of 113

I-1-I “ms Canada

E‘:.’.?.§¢a

““"“’-\

,…..n..

7331.37_

…….

sue

Canal

..armm.aua,gc.c.

Hlslon:

mag”

,__

i..-:1‘.-2;

Naliana\

m.:~:‘;-

Page

H|5|urvqua CanaIrR1dsau pavcscanada.gc.ca

Llgu

~a.m..y

PERNIIT

CONCORD

Canad’éI

June

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

74 20 23. 00

Page 104 of 113

Ii-I

the other

germ’ts

wood provincial

species

approvals

(APPLIES

?lyvteunl

at Risk

conditions

from

conducted

transferable not

these

sill pi

and/or

limits

ALL

:{lIVI(l«;c

TO or

0‘

ZVYO

5’»:

’/Xe:

Act

—

r..im./a

will

we voohnq n

1()(v’lrir) m

the

may

PROJ

mi.

bolt

be considered Fisheries Act

Ecrsi

llr/-B‘o/C

and

.t.,…,,

……

between

perform one

15”‘

and

on shorelines owner property

March

work

upland

the another, September

and

10”-,

waters

the

. Any or

Historic Rideau

Ihe

are

and ensur

“W5 Canada

ootai-_igd

Federal prior

that

responsibil Pro to

ensure

agencies

federal

mmmencement

all

cal

not be allowed where and federal gu‘ elines the wood is pre—treated shall not be used.

will

that

Page

creosote

allowed

contact

the

water. not is it

aoenc

3 is

meets

preservative

where

with

the approved work the local municipality. municipal or other any of work

dry.

orovincial

and

the

Canad'2’i

azmrovals

applicant’s

requirements

wood that direct with contact and wood treated

Treated in

74 25- 00 2°

the i-iistdrc prosecution.

June

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

violation lead may

r¢euvr1tr1t’l’IG§tiDVV';

t.’I.‘3v3’<v/K

PERMIT

iaelulur

t‘lgqL‘Vt’VJ

?r» :;"€“i4A-1.ll?iili‘1

7…

_i..,aiiii,.n

56 Ga rAr«*(>VliaHQd U1lA1L~riayrnen( ox‘!

§l?‘c§Ai’i'3i’z’Fa’LZ§“’“"“’

on based the lnfurrnalion subrrlltted application. h your W your with round application to be intentionaiiy falsi?ed, misleading the immediate in cancella of an your under approval. Charges or Fishe s Act may result.

granted

result

and

applicant’s

Canada

‘’‘’’‘‘‘°’

with

GENERAL

“i’“>”*'

‘made land' is to take the place on bed of the water Made land body. (viii) on the tieds of rivers streams and lakes. comprising the Rideau canal the beyond owner‘s property deeded frontage property poundary automatically becomes Federal land under the jurisdiction and admi tra of the n Parks canada Agency structures as such etc. are boathouses, care decks. considered land ‘made be taken to ensure that waterfront fac ities are on constructed the applicant’s upland so as not to jeopardize property ownership of the fa es. or

shall

not

provided creosote

responslblliw

all

It is

with

water

meets

Treated

private

should

Permanent

upland Crown

placed

?lling

Blasting No

—

eluded

Regulations

Applications canal are

canals

The approval inrormation incorrect, Will

comply

Regulations,

Failure canals

coNDlTloNs 1

5i::,*ir=§?.:='

Page 105 of 113

““5 Canada

boundary greater,

then

and

a written applicable must

unless

Federal

cultural

Canal.

where property

dep

and

the

rubble.

the used

and acceptaole

contact to be

have

These

shall

work

allow

has

shall

procedures. concrete

advised

other

shall

any

that

remain

prior

as to

any

work

during

until

Canada

site at

all

right to re uest immediately.

has over

the

wlll

during

the shall

proposed

cease

shore

the or

all

work intact work.

any n—water suspended

turpidity

the

apply.

all

site.

to prevent substances from the water.

the into

e. work

any

duration

bed

the

project.

the

lake and

shoreline

immediately

the

on-going

’

etc.

fish

notify

Canad’éi

the

river

in-

should

concrete

of entry water. the

from the Rideau Canal and local municipality that into the project water an open from upland 4.6 metres from (15 ft.) the nearest side yard property river or laed. lfthe setback mun c pal area is in your

Page

lake

obtained

structures

been minimum

setoack

that

times

artifacts he discovered owner/contractor/agent

3.1.2),

the

the ceased

must

rem of

’s

water.

work

the the

deb

control

and

shoreline completion

regularly

from

all

high

other

body.

defined

remclved

and

ice

any

once proceed The work must to work ensure

or limestone use screenings Parks permitted by Canada oceans for advice directly required. and

not

the

work

the

water

mplemented in place

in-water

the

following

controlled

away

deleterious

where

Fisheries

therefore

shall

during

stabilized

‘s

caused

project

material re—enter

completion the land.

this

implemented must be inspected

conducted

damage

repair

deleterious

enter

dams.

and

These

practice Department for coffer

oceans

been

any

upon and

including

measures,

implemented

the

not

water.

areas

appropriate

shall

maintenance

back

projection municipal

set

(policy

variance

““3

its

property.

features

altered

retains

approval

canal

Rideau

Should or on

work

Rideau

copy

water

A The

measures

shall

water mum.

condition

damage,

spect

June

0 2 3

74 2 25. 00

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

may only issued.

are

PERMIT

and related activities other agency approvals Parks Canada may

works

maintenance

in the rn

tidy

any

the

sedimentation.

maintenance

Fisheries

Please materials

not

including products.

rerue

canal.

settled.

orother in

have

into

disturbed

measures result

curtains. may

for

caused

control

silt),

line

ipal or permits.

or construction.

for

neat and inorganic a practical

contractor

erosion of sediment until all

in a and

responsible left

and/or (such

control

or this

project aquatic

leachate be totally significantly

not be

shor mun

issued

part:sl:anal‘ls.gc.l:a

‘I;-Ue\é=I|-I|I’sa1Ic>g:1_1l;ea_7~lIaIv=-nal

the nvolving use of concrete leachate is concrete. alkaline and highly life. Measures must be taken to any prevent incidence of concrete or from entering the watercours cast place mortars Al in concrete, grout. isolated from water and pre a on minimum for a 48 hour pe to cured allow the reach pH to neutral levels.

activities.

appropriate

Rideau

vehicular For and

Silt

that

Department cofrer dams

petroleum

All

—

for

The

sediment levels. work sediments

tained

entry

and

sediment

and

not responsible after the period

organic to be kept

The applicant sheries Act prevent and m

in—waler

provincial. required and

Turbidity

is hoth is

The

waste.

Crown

site

The

before

done

iance.

crown

The

comp

all

federal. to

required

conform

Construction

;larkscanaids.g:.ca

Page 106 of 113

I-I-I

works

stumps

the

expired

work

near

Siiikasas E2?-.°.§‘aa

for

replant

logs

stumps

shore

trees

the

and on

construction. and

tree

the

copy

htvofrways

or any

works.

pal A

shoreline

shore road copy of

consent

and

must

consent

accompany

from

written

the

consent

right-or—ways

June

8520-06017400

Approved

NO.

required

written

any

allowances works.

require prior written required

Municipality. and

mun |n—VValer

PERMIT

vegeta

fish

and

Page

habitat.

shrubs

logs on the lake bottom

emergent

habitat (

along

shall

lake

the

help

and

fish

stabilize

the

shall

Rock

shoreline

habitat.

is inadvertently

shall be applicant

disturbance

The habitat

There

valuable

other

ouirushes).

minimized.

constitute removed

and

shorel

not

bottom

wetland

on shall e. cattails

and

m e

2 0 2 3

legal

expire prior to the commencement or in-water comple ‘on of owner be responsible will for the contacting canal R cleau to period. Failure to obtain an extension to the work period is a violation under the Historic canals Regulations.

period property the n to

time

and aquatic riparian wetland emergent any fully restoring

important to provide cover

It is to

for

to to

during rubble,

minimized.

Rock rubble,

damaged

disturbance responsible

Disturbance

permit

work, an exten permit has

property. A and shoreline

the

works

in-water

fronting

for

from

fronting

..srcscanaus.g=.es

:La|é;<’i‘sak5&?;:=ea|l:lnlIon£ll

of the In—Water

request

e and clwrler(5) for

should shoreline once

gI:.l7B

must not be undertaken written prior permission accompany the Application

Application

deeded

shore

must

without

Darkscanada

Page 107 of 113

PERMIT

waterfront

I-In-I $:’::d:

PERIVIIT

ocsuon

FOR

visible

Saws“

Exnail:

June

RIDEAU

Falls

Please

June

Page

of11

on—x-c—cr.permits—permis@pc.gc.ca

Phone:

28, Contact

2024

28,

Contact

2024

IN-VVATER

Canada

VVORK

June

8520-0601

Approved

NO.

CANAL SITE OF CANADA Soul_11 Street ON 2A8 K7A

AND

613-283-7199

I-IISTORIC

Beckwith

Srniiihs

28, Information,

2023

SHORELINE

Iocanon

S]-nitlls

NATIONAL

Please

June

IN-VVATER

PERIVIIT

CANAL SITE OF CANADA Street South ON 2A8 K7A

AND

Beckvvith Falls Phone: 613-283-7199 on—rc—cr.pern|its—per)nis@pc.gc.ca 34

RIDEAU I-IISTORIC

Information,

28,

2023

SHORELINE

ms:

8520436017400 OSBORNE 122 DOG LAKE

For

VALID:

Email:

June More

NATIONAL

For

::“c:A::9,:::,“::.::*’°”:'

8520-06017400 OSBORNE DOG LAKE

““"°””'

FOR

rance

122

VALID:

NO. PERMIT LOCATION: VVATERBODY:

Post

PERMIT

PERMIT NO. LOCATION: VVATERBODY:

PERMIT

:::.’:.::§?.:-:'

74 23

20 25- 00

To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: October 12, 2023 Permission Application (S. 45(2) of the Planning Act) Subject: PL-ZNA-2023-0108, Sleeth and Spronck, 122 Osborne Lane, Storrington District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of this application for permission to enlarge a legal non-conforming boathouse under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, subject to conditions.

Background Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) Relief Requested The applicant seeks permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming boathouse on the property. Related Applications The lands are not subject to any additional applications under the Planning Act.

Discussion/Analysis Property Description The 0.3ha property is located on Osborne Lane and has approximately 200m of frontage on Dog Lake. The property contains an existing single detached dwelling, two accessory buildings, and a boathouse. The property is located at the end of a peninsula projecting out into Dog Lake. The property is treed and is characterized by undulating topography. The property is located in an area of similar waterfront residential development.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 108 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Permission Application (S. 45(2) of the Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2023-0108, Sleeth and Spronck, 122 Osborne Lane, Storrington District

Summary of Proposal To request permission under Section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge a legal nonconforming boathouse located on Dog Lake. The Township Zoning By-law classifies boathouses as a prohibited use. The existing boathouse was removed with a demolition permit this summer with the intention to construct a new boathouse. It was identified during the review of the building permit application for the new boathouse that planning approval was required for the enlarged structure. The existing boathouse was 44.5sqm in area and the proposed boathouse is to be 62.4sqm in area. The reason for proposing a larger boathouse is to accommodate larger boats within the structure. Agency Comments No comments were received from the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team at the time of writing this report. It is noted that Parks Canada has issued a permit for the proposed boathouse. Public Comments No comments were received from the public at the time this report was written. Planning Analysis The Township Official Plan Schedule designates the subject property as Rural and the property is zoned RLSW in Zoning By-law No. 2003-75. As the Zoning By-law identifies boathouses as a prohibited use, new boathouses are not permitted in the Township. Based on MPAC information the original boathouse appears to have been constructed in 1942, therefore the structure was established prior to the current Zoning By-law and would be considered a legal non-conforming use. As the boathouse is a legal non-conforming use the owner has the legal right to repair and replace the structure. Any proposed expansion of the boathouse would require permission from the Committee of Adjustment under Section 45.2 of the Planning Act which may permit the Committee to grant enlargements of existing legal non-conforming structures. The proposed boathouse will be constructed in the same location as the existing boathouse which will minimize the amount of site disturbance and vegetation removal that would be required. The structure is located in a small bay that faces northeast and is not visible from the main body of the lake. There are also mature trees along the shoreline which will assist in screening the boathouse. Ultimately the increase in size of the new boathouse compared

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 109 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Permission Application (S. 45(2) of the Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2023-0108, Sleeth and Spronck, 122 Osborne Lane, Storrington District

to the existing boathouse is small at 17.9sqm and will not result in a significantly different structure that what was existing. The Parks Canada permit has conditions that speak to the manner of construction, construction timing, vegetation removal, and sediment and erosion controls, that the development would be subject to and would serve to mitigate any impacts of the development. Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that it is appropriate for the Committee of Adjustment to grant permission to expand the legal non-conforming boathouse on the property, as described in this report.

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Recommendation That the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve for application PL-ZNA-2023-0108 for 112 Osborne Lane, subject to the following conditions.

Permission is granted to enlarge the legal non-conforming boathouse on the subject property. The replacement boathouse is permitted to have a 62.4 square metre floor area consistent with the submitted plans (Concord Engineering, dated August 14,

that will be attached to the Decision as Schedule “A”.

A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac. Report Prepared By: Tom Fehr, Planner www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 110 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Permission Application (S. 45(2) of the Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2023-0108, Sleeth and Spronck, 122 Osborne Lane, Storrington District

Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, MCIP RPP, Senior Planner

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 111 of 113

To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: October 12, 2023 Subject: Decisions on Delegated Consents

Summary This report is an information report to the Committee of Adjustment summarizing the Consents that have been approved by Delegated Authority since the last Committee of Adjustment Meeting.

Background The authority to grant undisputed consents is delegated to the Director of Development Services under By-law 2020-27. This report lists the applications which met the criteria for being considered as an undisputed consent and have received provisional consent approval. Committee of Adjustment is notified for information.

Discussion/Analysis a) PL-BDJ-2023-0090 (Oullette) (Beach) - Storrington This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on September 14, 2023. The purpose of this consent application was to create one new residential lot, being 3.5 acres in area, fronting on Sands Road. The severed parcel contains an existing dwelling. b) PL-BDJ-2023-0097 (Rosnak) - Bedford This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on September 25, 2023. The purpose of this consent application was to create a Right-of-Way to the subject property from Crow Lake Road.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 112 of 113

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Decisions on Delegated Consents

c) PL-BDJ-2023-0093 (Way) - Loughborough This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on September 25, 2023. The purpose of this consent application was to create one new waterfront residential lot, being 9.9 acres in area, with 127 metres of frontage on Sheila Lane, and 131 metres of frontage on Sydenham Lake. d) PL-BDJ-2023-0096 (Asselstine) - Portland This undisputed consent was granted provisional consent on September 25, 2023. The purpose of this consent application was to create one new rural residential lot, being 5.8 acres in area, with 76 metres of frontage on County Road 38. Attachments None. Report Prepared By: Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk Report Approved By: Brad Wright, Director of Development Services

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 113 of 113

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.