Published March 13, 2025

Word Count 16410 words

Reading Time 78 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: March 13, 2025 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2025/Committee Of Adjustment - 13 Mar 2025 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Committee Of Adjustment Meeting Agenda TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Thursday, March 13, 2025 Storrington Centre/Virtual Via Zoom .

Call to Order

Resolution.

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution.

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting will be live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/ Please visit the Virtual Committee of Adjustment Meetings page on the Township website for the link to register to be a participant in this meeting: https://www.southfrontenac.net/en/open-for-business/virtualcommittee-of-adjustment-meetings.aspx Instructions about participating via Computer, Laptop, Smartphone, Tablet and Telephone can be found at the above noted link as well.

PowerPoint Presentation Staff has prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that will be displayed on the screen of the meeting, you can also follow along with the PDF version that is in the attachment of this agenda item.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

There are none.

Approval of Minutes – February 13, 2025

Resolution.

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Consent Applications:

Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2023-0004 (Vowles) - Storrington District

3-9

10 - 26

Property Address: 4938 Alex McLean Lane Purpose & Effect of the Application: The applicant proposes to demolish the house and garage on the property and to construct a new house and detached garage. The house would be 26m from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake

Page 1 of 68

to the south and 17m from the highwater mark to the east. A minor variance is being requested to allow the house to be setback less than the 30m from the highwater mark required by the Zoning Bylaw. b)

PL-ZNA-2025-0010 (Widrow) - Bedford District

27 - 64

Property Address: 1125 James Wilson Road Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling within 30m of the highwater mark of Canoe Lake. The applicant proposes to enlarge the existing 142sqm dwelling with attached deck. The proposed enlargement would involve renovating and adding area to the existing main floor (primarily the eastern side), adding a partial second storey above the renovated eastern side, and screening in a portion of the renovated attached deck on the western side. The enlarged dwelling would have a gross floor area of ~272sqm, a building height of 10m, and would be setback ~24.8m from the highwater mark, with the attached deck being setback ~19.1m from the highwater mark. 10.

Other Business

Delegated Consent Authority Report

Adjournment

Resolution.

65 - 68

Page 2 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025

Township of South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes Meeting # 2025-01 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Storrington Centre/Virtual Via Zoom Present: Norm Roberts, Ray Leonard, Steve Pegrum, Scott Trueman, Alan Revill, Brett Moreland, Kevin Fox, Mike Howe (via Zoom) Absent: Staff: Christine Woods, Manager of Planning, Noah Perron, Planner, Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary-Treasurer 1

Call to Order

Resolution. Resolution No. 2025-01-01 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Kevin Fox THAT the February 13, 2025 meeting of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of South Frontenac is hereby called to order at 7:00PM.

Adoption of Agenda

Resolution. Resolution No. 2025-01-02 Moved by: Ray Leonard Seconded by: Brett Moreland THAT the Committee of Adjustment adopts the Agenda for the February 13, 2025 Committee of Adjustment meeting. Carried

Committee of Adjustment Appointments

Appointment of Committee of Adjustment Chair (Resolution) Resolution No. 2025-01-03 Moved by: Norm Roberts Seconded by: Ray Leonard THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby appoints Steve Pegrum to the position of Chairperson for the 2025 calendar year.

Carried

Page 3 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 b)

Appointment of Committee of Adjustment Vice-Chair (Resolution) Resolution No. 2025-01-04 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Ray Leonard THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby appoints Alan Revill to the position of Vice-Chairperson for the 2025 calendar year. Carried

Electronic Meeting Information

The meeting was live streamed at the following link: http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp/

Staff prepared a PowerPoint Presentation that was displayed on the screen of the meeting.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

There are none.

Approval of Minutes – December 12, 2024

Resolution. Resolution No. 2025-01-05 Moved by: Steve Pegrum Seconded by: Alan Revill THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves the minutes of the December 12, 2024 Committee of Adjustment meeting.

Consent Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable)

New Consent Applications:

PL-BDJ-2024-0105 (Fanning) - Bedford District

Carried

Property Address: 184 Burridge Lake Road Purpose & Effect of the Application: The application is requesting consent to create a new rural residential lot. The severed parcel is approximately 1.3ha in area with approximately 105m of frontage on Burridge Lake Road. The severed lands are currently vacant. The retained lot will be approximately 74ha in area with approximately 250m of frontage on Burridge Lake Road 220m of frontage on Burridge Lake. The retained lands are developed with a dwelling, a barn, and accessory structures. The property is primarily designated Rural in the Township Official Plan and zoned Rural in the Township Zoning Bylaw with some areas on the retained lands being designated and zoned Environmental protection. Christine Woods, Manager of Planning, delivered her report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be denied, due to inadequate sightlines and unsafe access. Steve Pegrum, Chair of the Committee, asked if the applicant or agent would like to address the Committee.

Page 4 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 Kaylie Fanning, applicant, thanked the Planning Department and the Committee for considering the application, and stated that it has been a lifelong dream to be able to sever and build on a piece of her grandparents property. With respect to the suitability of the existing driveway, Ms. Fanning stated that the driveway has existed for over 37 years, and that traffic usually travels at a reduced speed of 40km/hr due to road conditions. Ms. Fanning stated that both the school bus and the users of a nearby boat launch regularly use the existing driveway to turn around, which is evidence of the laneway having safe sightlines for the speed of traffic. She stated that very few, if any, of the existing entrances on Burridge lake Road would meet the current sightline standards of 120m. She concluded that Burridge Lake Road is a dead-end road, which results in no through traffic, and that the driveway she would be sharing would be with a family member. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether there were any members of the public who wished to address the Committee. Victoria Capes, neighboring resident, stated that she lives along Burridge Road and shares a driveway with another member of Ms. Fanning’s family, setting a precedent for shared laneway usage in the area. Ms. Capes stated that her existing driveway has far less visibility than the driveway Ms. Fanning is proposing to use, and expressed her support for Ms. Fanning’s application. Ms. Capes suggested that the municipality perform a traffic study, which she believes would illustrate the limited amount of traffic on the road, as well as the slow rate at which these vehicles travel. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether there were any other members of the public who wished to address the Committee. Sheldon Polanski neighbouring resident at 137 Burridge Lake Road (participating via Zoom), stated that he had no objection to the application, but that he would like to know where the delineation line would be between his property and the newly severed lands. He requested to be able to receive a copy of the survey of the severed lands once it is completed. Mr. Polanki stated that he was surprised to learn that this portion of Burridge Lake Road was not owned by the municipality. He also stated that there is a right-of-way with respect to the boat launch in the area, and that during the fishing season many people do use Burridge lake Road and park their vehicles along the roadway. Ms. Woods responded to Ms. Caves comments by stating that the existing properties and driveways to which Ms. Caves was referring have been in existence for a long time, and that today’s standards would not have been applicable at the time these properties were created. With respect to Mr. Polanski’s question on the property boundaries, Ms. Woods stated that whenever a consent application is approved, one of the conditions of approval is that a reference plan of the newly severed property be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor, which would then be accessible through the Ontario Land Registry. The surveyors will install iron bars, flags, etc, which will help to delineate the severed parcel from Mr. Polansky’s property.

Page 5 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 With respect to the status of the road, Ms. Woods stated that Burridge Lake Road is a forced road, and that often times the existing roadways, due to topography and natural features, are unable to fall within the bounds of the municipally-owned road allowances. In the case of Burridge Lake Road, it is still considered a municipal road and is maintained by the Township, however the title is not in the name of the municipality. As such, one of the conditions of approval of the application would be that the title of the road be transferred to the municipality. Ms. Woods thanked Mr. Polansky for bringing attention to the occurrence of boat launch traffic and parking. Mr. Pegrum asked if there were any questions from Committee members regarding the application. Committee member Ray Leonard inquired as to what speed limit was considered when determining the sightline measurements. Ms. Woods stated that she is not an expert in these policies as they are the responsibility of the Public Services department, but she believed it was typically 80 km/hr, but suggested that Mr. Leonard may have more insight due to his time as the Roads Superintendent. Mr. Leonard replied that unmarked roads are 80km/hr, but with this particular roadway he would not want to drive over 30 km/hr. As such, the sightline requirements don’t make sense for this location, especially given that the school bus turns around in this laneway. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether there were any other questions form Committee members. None heard. Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk & Secretary Treasurer, read the resolution for denial of the application. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether there were any comments from Committee members. Committee member Alan Revill stated that he did not support the resolution as it stands. He has driven the road many times in the past and believes that the sightlines of the laneway are more than adequate for the speed that is able to be accommodated by the road. Resolution for denial of the application was defeated. Committee member Revill put forth a motion to approve the application with the various conditions that have been discussed. Ms. Woods presented the details of the conditions that would accompany the application, should it be approved. The applicants did not raise any questions or concerns regarding the conditions. Mr. Revill sought clarification for the portion of the road that would need to be surveyed and transferred to the Township. Ms. Woods confirmed that it would be for the length of the subject lands up to Space Lane, with the exception of some smaller portions which are already owned by the municipality.

Page 6 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 Mr. Revill inquired as to what the cost of having this surveyed would be. Ms. Woods replied that she does not have a sense of the cost of having it surveyed. Mr. Revill expressed his concern for the survey costs that the applicant will have to bear. Scott Trueman, Committee member, sought clarification regarding where the various measurements in the conditions were derived. Ms. Woods provided clarification with respect to the width of the easement and road allowance. Mr. Trueman requested confirmation that the width of the road allowance was only for the purpose of the transferred property, and that the applicants would not be responsible for altering or widening the physical road to meet this measurement. Ms. Woods confirmed that to be the case. Committee member Norm Roberts as well sought confirmation that the applicant’s did not have to bear any expense with respect to the road, except for the survey costs. Ms. Woods confirmed that they would not be required to make any physical changes to the road itself, they just need to survey the road to transfer to the municipality. Mr. Trueman inquired as to whether the resolution needed to be altered to include the conditions that were discussed. Ms. Kaestner confirmed that nearly all applications that will be heard before the Committee will be subject to conditions, and the resolutions will always be worded to include this statement. Kevin Fox, Committee member, inquired as to whether the Committee needed to accept all of the conditions. Mr. Pegrum stated that he believed that to be the case. Mr. Revill stated he believed the applicant could appeal the conditions but that the Decision would include those recommended by Planning staff. Mr. Fox sought clarification regarding the condition for the driveway easement. Ms. Woods responded that the easement will be surveyed to be a certain width and that the driveway will be built within that width. Having the 4.5m width allows for the driveway to be expanded or for the applicant to maneuver around obstacles without the risk of trespassing. Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Resolution No. 2025-01-06 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Norm Roberts THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby denies application PL-BDJ-20240105, to create one new rural residential lot from lands municipally addressed as 184 Burridge Lake Road. Defeated

Page 7 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 Resolution No. 2025-01-07 Moved by Alan Revill Seconded by Scott Trueman THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-BDJ-20240105, for property municipally addressed as 184 Burridge Lake Road, permitting the creation of one new rural residential lot and one easement for shared entrance, the new lot being 1.3 hectares in area with 105m frontage on Burridge Lake Road, subject to conditions. Carried 9 Minor Variance / Permission Applications from a Previous Meetings: (if applicable) 10

New Minor Variance / Permission Applications:

PL-ZNA-2025-0004 (Hollingsworth) (Cunha) - Bedford District Property Address: 70 Palmer Lane, Unit C Purpose & Effect of the Application: To request permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling within 30m of the highwater mark of Burridge Lake. The existing dwelling has an area of ~64sqm, a building height of 5.4m and is setback ~25.6m from the highwater mark. A 50sqm attached deck exists on the lakeside of the dwelling, setback ~22.6m from the highwater mark. The proposal seeks to construct a ~28sqm addition along the southwest corner (away from the shoreline), a 49sqm loft addition, and a ~10sqm covered porch over a portion of the existing deck. The enlarged dwelling would have a gross floor area of ~151sqm, a building height of 7.1m and would encroach no further towards the highwater mark. Noah Perron, Planner, delivered his report to the Committee with a staff recommendation that the application be approved, subject to conditions. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether the applicant or agent wished to address the Committee. Antonio Cunha, agent for the application (participating via Zoom), stated that the goal with the proposal was to modernize the dwelling to current standards and expand it to accommodate an aging family member. He stated that any new construction is to take place beyond the 30 metre waterfront setback, and that the proposal is modest and aims to improve the building’s overall condition. Mr. Pegrum inquired (3 times) as to whether there were any members of the public who wished to comment on the application. None heard. Mr. Pegrum inquired as to whether there were any questions from Committee members. Alan Revill sought clarification as to whether it was purely additions being added or whether the dwelling was to be demolished and rebuilt. Mr. Perron replied that the application stated that the proposal was for additions to the dwelling. Committee members were given another opportunity to ask questions. None heard.

Page 8 of 68

Minutes of Committee Of Adjustment February, 13, 2025 Ms. Kaestner read the resolution for approval of the application, subject to conditions. Resolution No. 2025-01-08 Moved by: Alan Revill Seconded by: Scott Trueman THAT the Committee of Adjustment hereby approves application PL-ZNA-20250004, for property municipally addressed as 70-C Palmer Lane, granting permission to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Burridge Lake, subject to conditions. Carried 11

Other Business

Consent Granting Authority Report Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk, presented her report to the Committee. There were no questions from Committee members regarding the report.

Adjournment

Resolution. Resolution No. 2025-01-09 Moved by: Scott Trueman Seconded by: Steve Pegrum THAT the February 13, 2025 meeting of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of South Frontenac is hereby adjourned at 8:05 PM to reconvene on Thursday, March 13, 2025 at 7:00PM or at the call of the Chair. Carried

Steve Pegrum, Chair

Page 9 of 68

Page 10 of 68

Page 11 of 68

war

1 ‘l .

reason

[\j

subject

are

the

nearest

used

(Le.

Please

residence,

indicate

Qeorowcck}

the

vu/E

?Yes

whether garage,

Mt$g

gawk s

are

the

etc.)

and

property

sad/Jerks“;

any

EXISTING

land?

by water approximate

“59‘Yes (in

{xx-t .;<,

with

‘

the

buildings

only, please distance

maintained

{a‘

‘

fac

structures

indicate these

road?

LY]

of ,\

the

(: ch

the

from

parking

s u b j e c t

tl_ see ;.| fskedi Yes ~

bexrirk

Zoning e'4

( m

L‘s“

7 ‘3

VARIANCE

the

PFQF’Q“

ckemt L ofwal'xt\3

NLIKL ? ere…“

rte—La

1,.

Ce?r

MINOR

road/lane):

FOR amended

provisions

s w . egos

(on

K‘L‘Kk‘6“ QAFJ ls not

rib/Co

1 1

By—law:

~7 s s s ‘

Zoning

Area:

Frontage

land.

APPLICATION c. 1990, P.13

compl ””5”“

municipally

”70

subject

the

subject

R.S.O.

cannot

ouhh;(.L{l/?

there shed,

uses

N 9

L‘kw

use

on front road?

road.

used

from

land:

the

Hub

Act,

FRONTENAC

relief

f _/“qu(,‘ L;E l

ere,“

proposed

Pr:

the

subject

K—Leu n

subject to be public

the

area

‘3 ‘3 g

and

xmr property

existing

the

maintained

Road/Lane:

privately

A L«2*

access

What

and

ccdr~9g

SOUTH

Planning

Grew ‘Cro .\

uikk

the

w extent

in?rm—“w;

fuckker

“(ggafisn

the

facilities

Name

Does

why

and:

and

1N{e(€~e_rlu_

“mm

The Lzll

‘kp‘al‘upr‘cx?ge,

e¢l$ttmx

mew—u}

(Ea—‘6

The nature geeks“-

zoning

5“7

current

The

Depth:

water):

depth

(on

frontage(s),

Frontage

The

TOWNSHIP

Page 12 of 68

Setback

Lot

14.Are

13.The

any be

building(s) built on

proposed

the

*Yes

subject

for

R.S.O.

additions

‘

6‘

‘

;

1’

?’

-9

4 E

existing

‘

FOR

MINOR

indicate:

amended

building(s)

(3)

structure

Fl”/’—

.L,

:1?

.QS

APPLICATION P.13 1990, c.

building

QC"

”F7

‘6}

(2)

EACH

land:

‘

(“‘43

subject

structure(s). land?

the

I g

EL §

yes,

.67.» O

Qé‘

“‘

4’

Act,

SOU-TH FRONTENAC Planning

.9.

‘

)

1 1

lags-.2

item

.-dmm

uses

High

story)

Area

two

Setback from Water Mark (If applicable)

Dimensions Floor

story

songe

din

from Line

Line

from

Hei ht of B (Alsogindicate if

Side

Setback

Rear

Setback

Front

answer

Structure residence)

If the

Type (E.g.

TOWNSHIP

structure(s),

VARIANC E

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENACAPPLICATION FOR MINORVARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, 0. R13 as amended 15. If the answer to item 14 is yes, for each proposed addition, building or structure indicate:

(1) Type ofStructure ( E.g . resudence)

(37¢lat Intel (gar/(z ,Ll—H-hd’ve‘? ire/£-

(2 '

V‘"”“”"

‘7

7—02 M

ka“?o\

O‘u"‘1‘:7(

I. Setback from FrontLotLine

… 1w

0 i»

—+

Setback from RearLotLine

F’or‘w‘

“(00W

Ola

’7…“

”K

[UOM

i Setback from Side LOt Line

a "

Height of Building (Also indicate if it is one story ortwo story)

Outside Dimensionsof Building/Structure

Setback from High Water Mark (If applicable)

2‘

“S

p.»

“7

‘

II _

Z S n wL

(?x/bl.K

”2, 6

l “l

( 2”t9“?

“H

.. 7 3><IU a 7

“"—

VXMM

Z 3

01 Ina

(90

H33 ><33m

‘

‘M

v»—

front the from setback the lane, a private on and waterfront, on is property subject NOTES: 1) If the lot line and the setback from the high water mark willbe the same. O NLY, CONSTRUCTION NEW the to relate 2) The dimensions required in this question and NOT to the total size of the completed building.

Do your plans include any DEMOLITIONof existing structures?

twigs

U N0

If yes, please provide details:

Maw—.0»!

(“W

(«x?‘hc‘

6’

OM‘YV‘U‘”

Page 13 of 68

Page 14 of 68

whether

storm

drainage

system.

sxoct\s

provided

means:

the

is provided

and

sewers,

the

existing

owned

provided

ditches.

owner:

subject

swal‘es or

tspim

the

other

and

a publicly or communal

means?

231-4th

land by individual

well,

owned

N o N o

N o

Y es

pa.

owned

opera ted lake,

land s:

KN o

L‘

|:|

VARIANCE

subject

continued:

Ll Yes

El Yes

communal

publicly

land

Yes

MINOR

L 1 Yes

FOR amended

have

structure?

constructed

operated

the

individual

land

subject

were

current

encroach

and

the subject operated

the

system?

structures

uses

?xtures

bedrooms

llk?LiuldevP

disposal privately a

APPLICATION c. P.13 1990,

development?

structure

D‘ALII

owned

and (‘5

existing

Lot

tzjaeurs

sewage

Dav-sue

other

sewage

whether

Indicate

was

or septic acquired

living

plumbing

number

space

RAISING

FRONTENAC Act, R.S.O.

proposed

addition

the

details:

the

buildings

land

SOUTH

Planning

existing

‘E { that

water

a privately means:

time

existing

the the

2L Q

subject

Will

Increase

Privlseav

system. other or

length

the

(d)

(0)

Increase

(b)

uses

provide

Increase

the

include

(3)

operated privy,

body,

water

Indicate

.The

date

20.The

CL)

date

“

19.The

(‘5‘

he:

‘

plans please

are

your

yes,

What

N wet-i) sl wsu 1k}

1 8.

TOWNSHIP

Page 15 of 68

Please

**Note:

The location approximate the land that is adjacent drainage watercourses, tanks, wells and septic lines.

The distances property to importance be and

The

location

abutting

reference lot line

should

to on—site IS varied,

all

a …… point landmark

river

abutting REQUIRED be prepared

and

natural subject

distance

all

to the ditches,

Show

the file

file

lands.

distance as a

an d

o f

P l a n n i n g

i g n if i c a n t

s of ns.

bar

the subject buildings, wetlands, the applicant’s

subject la crossing. n d

location

owners’ fields and septic wells. be shown. SKETCH The is as carefully, neatly and accurately to

THE

subject

the

the railway

the

VARIANC E

application

the

TOP

including

THE

between or bridge

land

the

been

number

under

MINOR

and artificial features land. Examples include or stream banks, barns, these of features from

such

subject

FOR

amended

application

ever

aka

number

ARROW

following:

Le,

the

NORTH

the

P.13

land has Variance).

give

subject

APPLICATION

1990,

Q1?{7 f,“

give

subject (Minor

(neighbours’) of

showing HAVE

‘5'

the

please

land is Consent.

Act

please

yes,

FRONTENAC R.S.O. Act,

and dimensions buildings.

iv)

boundaries proposed

MUST

The location of nearest township

‘3

submitted

iii)

yes.

The and

SKETCH

must

0131

DNo 27

whether Planning

ii)

item

indicate of the

question

THE

SKETCH

“V

SOUTH

Planning

the subject Subdivision

answer

application.

If the

the

“'.

iffy es

please If known. under Section

Yes

whether Plan of

answer to application.

[:1

indicate a of

If the of the

approval

TOWNSHIP

Page 16 of 68

Inset Inset Map Map

N OBLE LANE

LAKE ROAD

LOWER ROUND

DORIS SMITH LANE

TO D D LE LA N E

NE LA

W ELLINGS L A N

ERNIE ROAD

EA CL

SHORE LANE

SLEETH ROAD

Loughborough Lake

Milburn Creek

PL-ZNA-2023-0004 (VOWLES)

Milburn Creek

SEA ER TT BA OAD R

4938 ALEX MCLEAN LANE

Cedar Lake

Legend Subject Property Provincially Significant Wetland Wetland Wooded Area Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity Lake Trout Lake - Not at Capacity Non-Lake Trout Lake - At Capacity

X ALE

NL LE A MC

Township Boundary

Road Railway

Loughborough Lake

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © King’s Printer for Ontario, 2022.

Page 17 of 68

While the County makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Scale: 1:2,500

100 m

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

Date: 2023-01-23

GENERAL NOTES:

PLAN LEGEND DRIVEWAY STRUCTURE FOR

LOT COVERAGE

Set

2 7.3

AREA

Rise

Proposed Detached garage 78 m2

PROPOSED PRIMARY DWELLING

192 m2

ATTACHED COVERED PORCH

54 m2

ATTACHED GARAGE STRUCTURE

78 m2

DETACHED GARAGE STRUCTURE

78 m2

TOTAL COVERAGE

402 m2

LOT AREA

5,605 m²

LOT COVERAGE RATIO

7.2%

PROPERTY LIMIT (LEGAL)

RESIDENTIAL WORKS HL3A PAVEMENT (OPTIONAL)

92%

GRANULAR ‘A’

150

98%

GRANULAR ‘B’

200

100%

REGULATORY FLOODPLAIN

A Sun

PROPOSED ELEVATION

THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LAYOUT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

2.0 %

PROPOSED GRADE 6.

THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FROM THE COUNTY, MUNICIPALITY, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, HEALTH UNIT AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.

EXCAVATE AND DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL, SUCH AS ASPHALT, CURBING AND DEBRIS, OFF SITE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND THE COUNTY, MUNICIPALITY OR CONSERVATION AUTHORITY.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFETY MEASURES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, INCLUDING THE SUPPLY, INSTALLATION, AND REMOVAL OF ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE.

ALL DIMENSIONS AND INVERTS MUST BE VERIFIED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION, IF THERE IS ANY DISCREPANCY THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE ENGINEER.

LEACHING BED

200mm GRAN B SUB-BASE (mud matt)

ALL SEPTIC SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 8 OF THE MOST CURRENT VERSION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE (OBC).

THE TOPSOIL TO BE STRIPPED AND SUBGRADE TO BE SCARIFIED IN BED AREA PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW.

PROVIDE A 250mm THICK CLAY SEAL IF RAISED LEACHING BED IS TO BE INSTALLED ON BEDROCK.

PROVIDE NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (FILTER CLOTH) ROOT GUARD TO THE FILTER BED, INSTALLED VERTICALLY TO PROTECT AGAINST TREE ROOTS FROM LARGE ADJACENT TREES TO THE FILTER BED WHERE NECESSARY.

allowance for sewage system and filter bed by others refer to septic design

Rise

SITE GRADING NOTE: ensure all water runoff from proposed development is is contained and diverted away from neighboring properties. side yard swale grades are to be verified on site.

5 5.5

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain

7.4 .9 0

WASHED SEPTIC STONE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OBC 8.7.5.3. (5).

FILTER MEDIA TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OBC 8.7.5.3. (3).

DISTRIBUTION PIPING TO HAVE A SLOPE OF 0.3% MIN TO 0.5% MAX

DISTRIBUTION HEADERS AND PIPING WITHIN THE LEACHING BED TO BE LOCATABLE BY MEANS DESCRIBED IN OBC 8.7.2.2. (2).

GRANULAR ‘A’ AND GRANULAR ‘B’ TO BE COMPACTED TO 98% SPD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

ENVIRONMENTAL: 1.

EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND MONITORED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL COMPLETION. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE REMOVED ONCE THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED AND SITE WORKS COMPLETED.

IN THE EVENT THAT HUMAN REMAINS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE MINISTRY OF CITIZENSHIP, CULTURE AND RECREATION SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY AND THE REGISTRAR OR DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF THE CEMETERIES REGULATION UNIT OF THE MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL RELATIONS (416) 362-8392, SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.

IN THE EVENT THAT BURIED ARCHEOLOGICAL REMAINS ARE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE MINISTRY OF CITIZENSHIP, CULTURE AND RECREATION SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.

SITE BENCHMARK

12 22.

n A

100.00

MA X

RESIDENTAL RURAL ENTRANCE

June Su

ALL UNDERGROUND SERVICES, MATERIALS, AND INSTALLATIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONTARIO PROVINCIAL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS (OPSS) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

EXISTING CONTOURING

AS SHOWN ON PLANS

OVERHEAD HYDRO POLE UTILITY EXISTING ELEVATION

Legal Property Line Limit of Property

TYPICAL ‘V’ BOTTOM SWALE

Set

THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, MATERIAL AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. PROTECT AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCIES THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. ANY UTILITIES THAT MAY EXIST ON SITE MUST BE LOCATED AND VERIFIED BY ITS OWNER.

15m SETBACK, FLOODPLAIN

0.45m MIN

150mm GRAN A BASE

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

. 14

0.30 MIN

June

3: 1

POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO BE ENSURED FOR FINAL GRADE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. IN NO CASE SHOULD GRADE BE DIRECTED TOWARDS THE FOUNDATION OF THE DWELLING.

PROPOSED DWELLING ACCESSORIES

WELL WITH 15m AND 30m SETBACKS

MAX 3:1

X MA 3:1

COMPACTION

APPOX. HIGH WATER MARK

100mm TOPSOIL & SEED

MAX

THE ORIGINAL TOPOGRAPHY AND GROUND ELEVATIONS, SERVICING AND SURVEY DATA SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DRAWING IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THESE PLANS. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INVERTS MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF THERE IS ANY DISCREPANCY THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER.

PROPOSED DWELLING

DEPTH(mm)

STRUCTURE TYPE

68 10.

3: 1

.1 30 0

Existing Dense Tree(s) to remain

Legal Property Line Limit of Property

Remove Tree

7.32 4.00

Proposed septic tank location. Min 1.5m from Propose Dwelling

gravel entrance

Proposed Attached garage 78m2

existing septic proposed septic

Denotes approx Limit of High Water Mark

Existing Garage to be removed

pass thru

9.80

0 13.0 5.50 1

Legal Property Line Limit of Property

5.21

Existing well

16 1 4.

Proposed Primary 2 Story Dwelling Height 11 m 192 m2

5 19.1 9 17.0

7 10.1

red ove

Por

4m ch 5

0 14.0 .50 16

Legal Property Line Limit of Property

9.62

Proposed covered porch framing on pile foundations (assumed)

ALL SEWER FEED PIPING TO HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2%

EFFLUENT FILTER TO BE POLYLOK PL- 122 OR EQUIVALENT.

SEWER AND CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PVC. SOLVENT WELD PIPE AND FITTINGS TO CSA B182.1

INSULATE ALL SEWER SERVICE PIPE WITH LESS THAN 1.2m OF COVER

SITE CONTROL THE TOPOGRAPHIC SKETCH SHOWN ON PLANS REPRESEENTS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND WAS COMPLETED BY THE GREER GALLOWAY GROUP INC. THEY SURVEY IS PRESUMED GEODETIC, UTM NAD 83. SITE STAKING, LAYOUT AND CONTROL BY OTHERS

SEPTIC TANK

DIST. PIPING

FROM STRUCTURE

1.5m

5.0m

FROM CASED WELL

15.0m

FROM ALL OTHER WELLS

15.0m

30.0m

FROM SURFACE WATER

15.0m

FROM PROPERTY LINE

3.0m

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 NO.

2025.02.03 2025.01.21 2025.01.13 2025.01.06 2024.12.09 2024.09.27 2024.09.24 DATE

NOTE: max 8% grade min 4% grade 2m from foundation

10.39

.31

SITE PLAN 1:250

15 m

Existing cottage dwelling to be removed

S.R.

DRAWN

S.R.

SCALE

as shown

TECHNICAL-CREATIVE -IMPASSIONED

4.80

1:250

1:500

DESIGN

SITE GRADING NOTE: CRCA Approval required

Denotes approx Limit of High Water Mark

PLOT PLAN

REVISED REVISED REVISED REV BASED ON CLIENT MARK UP ISSUED FOR REVIEW DRAFT PLOT PLAN DRAFT PLOT PLAN REVISION

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain 15m setback CRCA

1.88

26.5

26.23

2.95

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain 15m setback CRCA

S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R S.R BY

THESE DESIGN DOCUMENTS ARE PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE USE BY THE PARTY WITH WHOM AVIDITY DESIGNS HAS ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT. THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND MADE BY THE DESIGNER TO ANY PARTY WITH WHOM AVIDITY DESIGNS HAS NOT ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT. REPRODUCTION OR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN AUTHORIZED BY AVIDITY DESIGNS IS NOT PERMITTED.

. 39

Page 18 of 68

C:\USERS\AVIDI\DROPBOX\AVIDITY DESIGNS\2024 PROJECTS\2024-084 4938 ALEX MCLEAN LANE SCOTT VOWLES\PLOT REV.DWG

0 21.9

Existing well

.50

gravel entrance

Remove Tree

28.6

15.2

129

25.14

SEWER TRENCHING AND BEDDING SHALL CONFORM TO OPSD 802.010 AND 802.013 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

MINIMUM CLEARANCE DISTANCES OBC TABLE 8.2.1.6 A & B

w/s in

Denotes approx Limit of High Water Mark

Existing Dense Tree(s) to remain

8 10.6

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain

SANITARY

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain 15m setback CRCA

Denotes approx Limit of Regulatory Floodplain Denotes approx Limit of High Water Mark

LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE

4938 ALEX MCLEAN LANE LOT 5, CONC 10, PART 1 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC PROPOSED PLOT AND SITE PLAN

124.45 +/- (Aug 2024)

Existing Dock Structure

FILE NO.

DRAWING NO. SHEET

01 OF

February 28, 2025

File: MV/FRS/30/2025

Sent by E-mail Ms. Christine Woods Manager of Planning Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario K0H 2T0

Dear Ms. Woods: Re:

Application for Minor Variance PL-ZNA- 2025-0004 4938 Alex McLean Lane; Pt Lots 5&6, Concession 13, Part 1 Plan 13R15015 Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Loughborough Lake

Cataraqui Conservation staff have reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration based on our role as commenting agency responsible for natural hazards on Planning Act applications, and as administrator of Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits. Proposal The proposed development involves the demolition of the existing dwelling, garage, and outhouse and the construction of a new dwelling with attached garage, and a detached garage. The variance required is to: reduce the required setback from the highwater mark from 30 m, as required by the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law. Site Description The subject lands are located along the shore of the east basin of Loughborough Lake in South Frontenac Township. Access to the property is provided by Alex McLean Lane. The subject lands are relatively flat with a low-lying treed area in the approximate center of the lands. There are clear grassy areas at the rear of the property and back from the shoreline. The shoreline is treed and slopes gently towards the water. The lands are developed with an existing dwelling, garage, outhouse, and septic system. Discussion Cataraqui Conservation’s scope of review for this proposal includes the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake. Natural Hazards / Ontario Regulation 41/24

Page 19 of 68

Page 2 of 3 Flooding: The regulatory floodplain of Loughborough Lake is defined as the maximum recorded water level of the lake (125.03 m GSC). Cataraqui Conservation’s Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation 41/24 require that all new development be set back a minimum of 6 m from the regulatory floodplain of a waterbody. Based on our review, the floodplain extends into the center of the property resulting in a constrained lot. The existing dwelling is partially within the minimum 6 m setback of the floodplain and is not compliant with Cataraqui Conservation’s setback requirements for flooding. The proposed replacement dwelling is setback over 15 m from the extent of the floodplain and the attached garage is setback over 6 m. Accordingly, the proposed dwelling and attached garage will be located outside of Cataraqui Conservation’s required floodplain setbacks. A portion of the existing septic system filter bed is located within the floodplain. The proposed septic system was approved by KFL&A Public Health November 8, 2018. It is understood that no changes or enlargements are proposed to the existing septic system as part of this application. Erosion: Cataraqui Conservation directs development away from lands subject to long term erosion hazards. CRCA defines the extent of potential erosion hazards for till shorelines to be a stable slope allowance of 3(h):1(v) plus an erosion access allowance of 6 m. The shoreline slope is approximately 1 m high. The proposed dwelling is setback 17 m from the top of bank and as such, staff are satisfied with the proposal from an erosion hazard perspective. To ensure long-term erosion avoidance and slope stability, staff recommend the maintenance and enhancement of a healthy buffer of native vegetation between buildings/structures and the water, to help stabilize soils into the long-term. Runoff from buildings and structures and other hardened surfaces should also be directed away from the shoreline to a naturally vegetated location where infiltration can occur.

Recommendation Cataraqui Conservation staff have no objection to the proposed reduction from the high watermark setback. It is understood that no changes or enlargements are proposed to the existing septic system as part of this application. Staff recommend implementation of the above-noted best practice measures (in bold text) and advise the applicant that if the proposed development is approved, Cataraqui Conservation permit approval will be required. Ontario Regulation 41/24 Please note that lands within 15 m of the regulatory floodplain are subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits, (formerly Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses), which is administered by Cataraqui Conservation. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e.g. development and site alteration) to a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as flooding and erosion, and that the changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. If approved, construction of the new dwelling and attached garage will require Cataraqui Conservation permit approval. The landowner(s) should contact Cataraqui Conservation’s office at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under O. Reg. 41/24.

Cataraqui Conservation 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca

Page 20 of 68

Page 3 of 3

Please inform this office of any decision made by the Committee with regard to these applications. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 239, or by e-mail at estucke@crca.ca

Sincerely,

Emma Stucke, MCIP, RPP Resource Planner Cc: Owner & Agent by email

Cataraqui Conservation 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca

Page 21 of 68

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Date of Meeting:

March 13, 2025

Subject:

Minor Variance Application (S. 45(1) of Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2023-0004, Vowles, 4938 Alex McLean Lane, Storrington District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of the subject application for zoning relief for a single detached dwelling, subject to conditions, as this application meets the four tests of a minor variance outlined in section 45(1) of the Planning Act. Background Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Limited Service Residential - Waterfront Property Description The subject property is accessed from Alex McLean Lane, which is located on a peninsula in the East Basin of Loughborough Lake. The property is 5605 square metres (1.4 acres) in size. It is long and narrow, and generally flat. There is shoreline to the south and to the east. A wetland and floodplain cuts into the centre of the property. This is illustrated on the application sketch. Proposal The applicant proposes to demolish the existing house and garage on the property and to construct a new house and detached garage. A new sewage system was installed a few years ago in anticipation of this project. The existing two-storey dwelling has an approximately 132 square metre (1425 square foot) footprint. It is located on the southern tip of the property, and is setback 4.5 metres from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake at its closest point. The existing garage has an approximately 50 square metre (493 square foot) footprint. It is located in the southern half of the property, and is setback 20 metres from the highwater mark of the eastern shoreline. The new two-storey house with attached covered porch and attached garage would have a 325 square metre (3500 square foot) footprint. The house would be 26 metres from the www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 22 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2023-0004

highwater mark to the south and 17m from the highwater mark to the east. A minor variance is being requested to allow the house to be setback less than the 30m from the highwater mark required by the Zoning By-law. A minor variance is also required to permit lot coverage of the house to exceed 5%. The new one-storey, 78 square metre (840 square foot) detached garage would be located at the north end of the property near the lane. The building would comply with all applicable zone provisions. Zoning Relief Requested Section 5.8.2(a) and 10.3.1 – to permit a single detached dwelling to be setback a minimum of 26 metres from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake to the south and 17 metres from the highwater mark to the east, whereas a minimum 30 metre setback is required for all buildings and structures. Section 10.3.1 – to permit a maximum 5.8% lot coverage for the principal building (dwelling), whereas a maximum 5% is allowed. Related Applications This property has an approved minor variance (MV-022-03-S) for a 2,268 square foot, onestorey dwelling that could be setback 25.6 metres (84 feet) from the highwater mark to the south and 18 metres (59 feet) from the highwater mark to the east. Department and Agency Comments Cataraqui Conservation indicated in a letter dated February 28, 2025, that they have no objection to the application based on their consideration for natural hazard policies and as administrator of Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits. They noted that the proposed buildings will be located outside of, and setback from, the flooding hazard and shoreline erosion hazard associated with Loughborough Lake. The new dwelling with attached garage will require a permit under O. Reg. 41/24. Public Comments No comments were received prior to this report being finalized. Planning Analysis The proposal needs to be assessed against the four tests of a minor variance outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act. It is the opinion of Planning staff that the proposal meets the four tests as explained below.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 23 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2023-0004

Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The proposed variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan related to waterfront residential development, and development adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas. The variances would facilitate construction of a dwelling on lands that are designated Rural in the Official Plan on Schedule A. The proposed dwelling would replace two existing buildings, one of which is only 4.5 metres from the highwater mark and is located in the shoreline erosion hazard. The proposed dwelling would be located in the area of the existing detached garage, outside of the flooding hazard and erosion hazard. The setbacks would be maximized as intended by section 5.2.7(b) of the Official Plan. Does the variance maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? The proposed dwelling is a permitted use in the RLSW zone. The dwelling is designed to maximize the setbacks from the highwater mark, while maintaining adequate space between the building and the western property line for access around the building. Lot coverage for the dwelling would be 5.8%, which is slightly more than the 5% permitted in the RW zone. The additional lot coverage can be attributed to the narrow, covered porch on the building and the pass-thru connection between the dwelling and garage. The total lot coverage of all buildings would be 7.8%. The proposed variances maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Is the requested variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure in question? The requested variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The design and location of the proposed dwelling on the property ensures that the required setback from the highwater mark would be maximized in two directions. The existing dwelling that is 4.5 metres from the lake will be removed, resulting in a positive change on the property. Is the variance minor? The requested variances are minor as they maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and are desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The existing natural vegetation on the property, and particularly along the shoreline and western property line, should be maintained to help mitigate visual impacts when viewed from the lake and the property to the west. The buildings will be located in appropriate areas where there are no impacts anticipated on the subject or abutting properties.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 24 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2023-0004

Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve minor variance application PL-ZNA-2023-0004 for 4938 Alex McLean Lane, subject to the following conditions.

The minor variance is for a single detached dwelling. The dwelling is permitted to establish a minimum 17 metre front yard, and to be setback a minimum of 26 metres from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake to the south and 17 metres from the highwater mark to the east. The dwelling is also permitted a maximum 5.8% lot coverage. The location of the dwelling on the property must be consistent with the application sketch provided with the application (attached to the Decision as Schedule A).
The Owner is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the following matters and environmental standards of the Township: a. Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g. silt fence, straw bales) must be used during construction and until the site is stable and revegetated. b. Roof runoff will be directed away from the wetland and discharged to natural or constructed leaching pits/areas to maximize infiltration or onto coarse rock rubble splash pads to reduce the velocity of runoff. c. A natural vegetated buffer must be maintained in its natural state within 30 metres of the wetland and along the steep slope, except in the immediate area of the building envelope.
A building permit is required for ALL proposed demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
Minor variance PL-ZNA-2023-0004 is applicable only to Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 25 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2023-0004

Report Prepared By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP RPP, Manager of Planning

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 26 of 68

Page 27 of 68

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION (s. 45(2)) Updated June, 2023

provided the Committee

is of the opinion

Planning Application Fee: $1,230.00 $1,445.00 $2,206.00

Township of South Frontenac Minor Variance Only Minor Variance WITH Performance Review

$1’183'00

$46300 $72000

It is required that a Fee be provided for the Township to review onsite sewage disposal and Conservation Authority (where applicable) when submitting an application (Separate cheques, payable to the applicable Conservation Authority, are to be submitted with the application).

1~3Variances 4+ Variances After building without a permit

Application type:

It is required that one (1) copy of this application be filed with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment, together with the sketch, accompanied by a non-refundable fee in accordance with the chart below in cash, or by debit card, credit card or cheque made payable to the Township of South Frontenac.

Application Requirements

The Committee may grant permission to enlarge or extend a structure or alter the use of the lands where any land, building or structure, on the day the by-law was passed, was lawfully used for a purpose prohibited by the by-law.

ls desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure Maintains the general intent and purpose of the Of?cial Plan. Maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. ls minor in nature

The Committee may vary Zoning By-law provisions that the variance:

The Committee of Adjustment is a Committee of eight persons appointed by Township’Council. The Committee is formed under Section 45 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter R13, to authorize a minor variance from a zoning by—lawor permission under s. 45(2) to alter a legal non-conforming use.

Q ggyE-?g

Page 28 of 68

Personal information requested herein is required under the Planning Act, 1990 as amended. This information will be used by the Committee of Adjustment/Land Division Committee for the purpose of reviewing the above referenced application, and may be made available to those boards, Commissions, Authorities, Agencies and Persons having an interest in this matter. Any questions regarding the collection of this information should be directed to the Secretary Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment (PO. Box 100, Sydenham, Ont, KOH2T0, Phone 376-3027 ext.2224).

Collection of Personal Information

Each applicant shall provide a sketch showing the dimensions of the subject land and of all abutting lands as outlined in Question 29 of the application. The sketch should be accurately dimensioned and scaled in either Imperial or Metric measures. This sketch, in conjunction with the Application Form, is the basis for the analysis of the Minor Variance Application by the Committee of Adjustment. It is strongly recommended that the applicant spend the necessary time to carefully and thoroughly assemble the data and transfer the data to the sketch. It is important that the sketch be drawn with accurate dimensions and measurements. Any application which does not include the above required information may not be accepted. In this regard, the applicant may wish to secure the assistance of a person who specializes in the drafting of such sketches. A guide to answering the application questions is attached.

PLEASE READ THIS ITEMCAREFULLY

Please Note: These fees are for consultation on this application only; these agencies may require additional permit applications and fees prior to any construction.

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICA110N FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Date Received: 07-Feb-2025

Wes

Pre—Consultationforthisapplication

Planner:

@l’b?_ NIX!“

File No: PL-ZNA-2025-0010

Date of

pre-wnsultation:W@16

Lawrence Widow and (‘i Aldea

Name of Owner(s):

1300mllngwoud

FIJII Mailing Address of Owner(s):

Street. Kingston, Ontario K7L3X5

Phone number of Owner(s):

Email Address of Owner(s): If the applicant is NOT the owner of the subject land, the written authorization of the ownerthat the applicant is authorized to make the application. must accompany the application. Name of Authorized Agent:

Full Mailing Address of Authorized Agent:

253’.

mgmn

IOLD WYIQQQ}bf.

ON 14%? 232

Phone number of Authorized Agent: Email Address of Authorized Agent:

(of’o’ M’Oag

www—

Agent as named above is hereby authorized to act on behalf ofthe owners for purposes of processing this application for Minor Variance.

Signature(s) of Owner(s) The description of the subject land: District:

Zi/Bedford

Concession Number: Street Number:

“25

3 Portland

,_7Loughborough

3 Storrington

Lot Number:

Name of Road/Street:

Reference Plan Number: _ 22g bl 291 0

(Him

Part Number(s):

WIgm

Qdm

PT LbT ‘9 ‘PT 1L—

Rou Number. _LQLOLO_LQQ£O_O 1405,:

Page 29 of 68

Page 30 of 68

I ,

[deck @th noncmfwm‘mgdwelling

9| .1

m “to

‘+

‘

‘dt

—

W ’n c

Wilson Roget: Yes 3 No
Wes: No

If access to the subject property is by water only, please indicate the parking and docking facilities used or to be used and the approximate distance of these facilities from the subject land and the nearest public road.

i325 ,jcjm?;

Name of Road/Lane:

OR a privately maintained road?

[67.1%. The reason why the proposed use cannot comply with the provisions of the Zoning By—law:

6);an

‘

. ( lift/6W\

with in

Areai?J 0,, 9.0.9”)

—………………__…

2 m

[film

Frontage (on road/lane):

The nature and extent of the relief from the Zoning By-law:

(2; §W

The current zoning of the subject land:

Depth:

Frontage (on water):

138E“!!! I84.0lomQirregular j

The frontage(s), depth and area of the subject land.

Does the subject property front on a municipally maintained road?

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Page 31 of 68

2%35%

‘

m 6m MI

(3)

(4)

14.Are any building(s) or structure(s), or additions to existing building(s) or structure(s), PROPOSED

.le m x ‘25; \m

Ya .Oq m

(Cl”<5M

. Wm

(16134 3|

(2)

’g‘w _’ m <szultwnm?

6

The proposed uses of the subject land:

Setback from High Water Mark (If applicable)

‘

Dimensions of Floor Area

d’ t “r ’t’ Al (zsosmszgzsm

vam

(59.09m

Setback from Side Lot Line

Height of Building

1953M

Setback from Rear Lot Line

529.85M

hDUBE

(1)

Setback from Front Lot Line

Type of Structure (E.g. residence)

if the answer to item 11 is yes, for EACH building or structure indicate:

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Page 32 of 68

mm X ‘Ur.“m

(310?“ W‘

lq‘U‘céW‘

IOI17””

OICC‘JL

M’ZLPKSM I‘I.Ijhon

( masmzel-‘poqokmt

Progragm

“

(2)

(4)

(CI.197%

(Ems—F)

(e 25 m >‘ 5. 75m

”“

i?-Llcém

IOI’[W

861667160, PW

(3)

NOTES: 1) If the subject property is on waterfront, and on a private lane, the setback from the front lot line and the setback from the high water mark will be the same. 2) The dimensions required in this question relate to the NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY, and NOT to the total size of the completed building.

Setback from High Water Mark (If applicable)

Outside Dimensions of Building/Structure

(Also indicate if it is one story or two story)

( 0m

(20m

Setback from Side Lot Line

Height of Building

14106]

Setback from Rear Lot Line

070,§5

hOULSO

Setback from Front Lot Line

Type o f3 tructure (E.g. residence)

(1)

If the answer to item 14 is yes, for each proposed addition, building or structure indicate:

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Increase in number of bedrooms

Increase in plumbing fixtures

Increase in living space

Will the addition or structure encroach on the existing septic system?

(a)

(b)

(0)

(d)

What are the uses of the proposed development?

If yes, please provide details:

Do your plans include the RAISINGof an existing structure?

aotoi

E/No

Nam

Indicate whether sewage disposal is provided to the subject land by a publicly owned and operated sewage system, a privately owned and operated individual or communal septic system, a privy, or other means:

Indicate whether water is provided to the subject land by a publicly owned and operated piped water system, a privately owned and operated individual or communal well, a lake, or other water body, or other means:

an Know

21.The length of time that the existing uses of the subject land have continued:

WWW

20.The date the existing buildings and structures were constructed on the subject lands:

Novemmg

Et/No: No
Wes
Yes: No

E/Yes

_: No

Yes

Wes

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

19.The date the subject land was acquired by the current owner:

Page 33 of 68

l E

Page 34 of 68

E’No

If the answer to item 27 is yes, please give the file number of the application and the status of the application.

9410

The boundaries and dimensions of the subject land including the location of any existing and proposed buildings.

The location of a reference point……i.e. distance between the subject land and the nearest township lot line or landmark such as a bridge or railway crossing.

The location of all abutting (neighbours’) lands.

ii)

iii)

iv)

The approximate location of all natural and artificial features on the subject land and on the land that is adjacent to the subject land. Examples include buildings, railways, roads, watercourses, drainage ditches, river or stream banks, barns, wetlands, wooded areas, wells and septic tanks. Show distance of these features from the applicant’s property lines.

THE SKETCH MUST HAVE A NORTH ARROW AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE.

A SKETCH must be submitted showing the following:

3 Yes

If known, please indicate whether the subject land has ever been the subject of an application under Section 43 of the Planning Act (Minor Variance).
If the answer to question 25 is yes, please give the ?le number of the application and the status of the application.

Z Yes

Please indicate whether the subject land is subject of an application under the Planning Act for approval of a Plan of Subdivision or Consent.

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Page 35 of 68

Page 36 of 68

Form

Reason why you can’t comply: In other words, why can you not meet the required setbacks. It

—

Nature and Extent of Relief: This question is asking what you are asking to do that requires the variance for example, it could be that you are asking to be 25 m rather than 30 m from the high water mark, or that you are asking to increase the height of a structure within 30 m of the high water mark, or that you are seeking a variance to construct an accessory building closer to the front lot line than the principal building.
Current zoning: You may not be aware ofthe zoning on your property and this can be determined when you come in for pre-consultation with planning staff.
Frontage, depth, area, acres: All parts of this question must be completed.

—

Description of the Subject Land: a. District: The Districts are the same as the former Townships. If you are not sure, check the roll number (the long number beginning with 1029) on your tax bill. If the numbers are 010, 020 or 030, your district is Bedford; if the numbers are 040-050, your district is Loughborough; if the numbers are 060 or 070, your district is Storrington; and if the numbers are 080, your district is Portland. b. Concession and Lot Numbers: if you are not sure, check your tax bill c. Street Number: Your civic address if a civic number has not been assigned, leave this space blank. d. Name of Road/Street: This question applies whether or not you are on a private lane or a public road. e. Reference Plan No: If your property has been surveyed, it will have a plan number, and one or more parts on that plan. If your property has not been surveyed, leave this space blank. f. Roll No: This is the number beginning with ‘1029’ which appears on your tax bill. Please take time to look it up before submitting the application.
You may wish to appoint someone to act on your behalf during the variance process. If so, that person’s name, address and phone number should appear here All owner’s must sign the authorization.
The names of all owners must appear in this section, even if they live in separate residences, and the address(es) should be the full mailing address, complete with postal code.

A Guide to Completing the Minor Variance

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, 0. R13 as amended

Page 37 of 68

19)Date land acquired: When did you take possession of the property?

—

18)Uses of Development: Please answer each part of this question. An increase in living space would include anything with walls e.g. a screened porch would involve an increase in living space.

17)Raising of Structure: In other words, are you proposing to raise the building in order to construct a basement under it.

Demolition: All demolition requires a permit from the building department. In some instances, a proposed addition or increase in height cannot be accomplished without the removal of existing walls. Ifthis is not made clear to the Committee at the beginning of the process, you may find that, although you are granted permission to add on to your residence, you can’t actually do it because you have not made it clear that there is demolition involved.
Description of new construction: ALL proposed new development must be described here. If you are proposing to construct an addition to a dwelling, and to add a deck, please show this information in separate columns.

—

Proposed structures: It you are planning to build ANYTHING on the property, the answerto this question is “yes” This includes additions, decks, garages, septic systems.
Proposed Uses: Generally, the answer to this question will be the same as the answer to #10, but if, for example, the land is currently vacant, and you are planning to construct a dwelling, then the use to be described in section 10 would be “vacant recreational land”, and the use described in section 13 would be ”residential”
Description of buildings and structures: You must complete all sections of this question for each structure on your property. If there is a deck on your dwelling, please describe it separately from the residence.
Buildings: If there are ANY buildings or structures on the property now, the answer to this question is “yes”.
Existing Uses: e.g. residential, retail business, vacant recreational land
Parking and Docking: This question is only relevant is you can only access your property by water.

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Page 38 of 68

-—

Agreement to Indemnify: Must be signed in front of a commissioner of oaths you may have this done before submitting the application, or sign the application in front of staff who can sign as commissioners. All owners must sign the application, or it can be signed by an agent if one has been appointed.
SKETCH: We cannot stress enough the importance of a detailed, accurate, and complete sketch. You do not necessarily need to contract with a professional to draw the sketch, but sketches that are not drawn to scale, do not show dimensions and distances, or are not drawn neatly (PLEASE USE A RULER), will not be accepted.
If yes: if there has been a previous variance granted on the property, please indicate the application number if known, and what the details of the variance were.
Minorvariance: Has there ever been a minor variance granted on the property? If you are longtime owner of the property, you will probably be aware of any other special permission granted for a variance to the zoning by-law. If you are a new owner, the seller will probably have made you aware of this.
If yes: if there is a current application for severance or subdivision on the property, please indicate the ?le number. (Staff can help provide this information)
Application for consent: is there currently an application for consent (severance) being proposed for the property?
Drainage: Are there speci?c ditches that have been constructed to deal with drainage; is there natural drainage, etc.?
Septic: in most cases the answer willbe private sewage system, but there may be some privies.

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

1382614 Ontario Ltd. 208-1020 Bayridge Drive Kingston, ON K7P 2S2 HST# 882812720

Office: 613-384-0033 info@concordhomes.ca www.concordhomes.ca

March 5, 2025

Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac 3910 Battersea Road Sunbury, ON K0H 1H0

Subject: Permission Application for 1125 James Wilson Road Dear Members of the Committee, We are submitting this letter in support of our Permission Application for the property located at 1125 James Wilson Road. The existing 142m² dwelling and its adjoining decks are currently situated within the 30-meter setback from the high-water mark of Canoe Lake and are classified as legal non-conforming under current zoning regulations. We are seeking permission/minor variance to allow the expansion of this legal non-conforming dwelling, including the addition of a second level and a screened-in porch/deck. The proposed improvements include the removal of the existing pergola on the deck and the construction of a screened-in porch on the west end of the house, enhancing both the aesthetic and functional aspects of the home while creating a more cohesive design. Additionally, the second-level addition on the east end will provide expanded living space for our clients without significantly altering the home’s existing footprint. The proposed screened-in porch and deck will encroach only minimally closer to the highwater mark of Canoe Lake and will remain separated from the water by a substantial granite outcropping. Given the timing of this application, we have included site photos taken during warmer months to provide a clearer representation of the property’s conditions. These images illustrate the elevation of the existing home in relation to the water, as well as the granite ridges that serve as a natural buffer between the house and Canoe Lake. Additionally, a new septic system is being proposed to support the home’s expansion and to replace the aging existing system. The new system will be installed at a greater distance from the high-water mark than the current one, further improving environmental compliance.

Page 39 of 68

We wish to emphasize that our proposed addition complies with all other provisions of the current by-law applicable to the property – setbacks, building height, etc. The minor variance is solely required due to the location of the existing home within the 30-meter setback. We believe this request is reasonable and in keeping with the intent of the zoning by-law. We appreciate your time and consideration of our application and look forward to your favorable review. Should you require any additional information, we would be happy to provide further details or answer any questions the Committee may have. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Martin Mack President Concord Homes

Page 40 of 68

Photos of Site:

Image 1: Photo taken from waterfront side of property to show elevation of house. The large granite ridge can be seen on the right side of the image running along the side of the property

Image 2: View from the deck – elevated granite ridge with tree line can be seen between decks and waterfront

Page 41 of 68

Image 3: View of existing west end of the house with current decks

Image 4: Taken looking west from existing pergola – captures elevation of granite ridge beyond – sits higher than existing deck level

Page 42 of 68

Image 5: Another image from within pergola showing elevation of granite ridge buffer between existing house and waterfront

Image 6: Ridge between house and waterfront

Page 43 of 68

f1 givSOUTH F RO NTENAC PL-ZNA-2025-0010 (WIDROW) (CONCORD HOMES) 1125 JAMES WILSON ROAD JAMES W‘LSON RD

–

Wooded Area

Lake Trout Lake At Capacity

Lake Trout Lake Not at Capacity

Non-Lake Trout Lake At Capacity

Waterbody

I Township Boundary 1125 JAMES \MLSON RD

Road

Produced by me County orFrontenac under

license wunIhe Ontario MInIs1ryorNatural Resources O King’s Pnnler «or Omano, 2025. wnrle me Counly makes every e?orl Io rnsure that me Inlonnallon

presenled Is acmrah [or Ihe rnoendeduses onrnsmap, «here is an Inherent en’Dr in all mawng premiums,and aoculan/ mne mapping cannmbe guaranteed (or all possible uses Thls map dlsplays basic

Page 44 of 68

topographic lealures onry

JAMES W‘LSON RD

Scale: 1:850

:—

m UTM Zone 18 NAD 83 Dale I1/u212025

Page 45 of 68 ’

’

BOTTOM or RIDGE

TOP OF RIDGE

II I

‘\

APPROXIMATE IDCATION or CRCA MAXIMUMRECORDED WATER LEVEL ELEVATION: 142.52m

EXISTING DISPERSAL BED

21.14m

30m SETBACK FROM CRCA MAXIMUMRECORDED WATER LEVEL

EXISTING WATER LEVEL OBSERVED 0N JANUARY 8A 2026 ELEVATION: 140.38m

30 (MIN)

~7m

142m:

11m (MAX)

59m2(MIN)

GROSS FLOORAREA HIGHWATERMARKSETBACK

10.000m2(MIN) 18mm

~10,900 m2

10m (MIN)

91m (MIN)

NIA

10m (MIN) 3’” (MIN)

LOT FRONTAGE BUILDINGHEIGHT

24.35:” 16mm 8mm

30m (MIN)

5% (MAX)

LOTAREA LOTCOVERAGE

SETBACKS

OPMEXIEIIIG

REQUIRED ZONING UMITEDSERVICE RESIDENTIALWATERFRONT

DITA

DE AILS OF DEVEL

’

T0,,

‘

or m

I‘

‘

I ,

CLOSED BY BYVIAI’I 154986

’

‘

INST NO II‘R745128

32.1% .

‘

{IND FESIEITYIm?f’IFE’B‘I‘IIDP‘S?IIEB SURVEYOR DATED JANUARY 2018

PART 1 PLAIN 13R~6622

(3.101

h\mj«u \2woo\1m

SCA IST LE: IN G

m EX U

EXIST ING

ROAD ALLOWANCE RIII’I’WIIIENLOTS 5 &

BOTTOM OF RIDGE

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DRILLED WELL LOCATED BENEATH WOODEN DECK

EXISTING OBSERVATORY

;

‘

Page 46 of 68 I

,‘

I I

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DISPERSAL BED DISTRIBUTION LATERALS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED 01" AT AN APPROVED RECEIVING FACILITY

PUMPED CRUSHED AND REMOVED

EXISTING SEPTIC TANK TO BE

XKE CANOE LII

,‘

BOTTOM OF RIDGE

ELEVATION: 142.3211)

MAXIMUMRECORDED WATER LEVEL

‘

APPROmIATE LOCATION DE CRCA

30m SETBACK FROM CRCA MAXIMUMRECORDEDWATER LEVEL

EXISTING WATER LEVEL OBSERVED ON JANUARY 6, 2025 ELEVATION: 140.36m

HIGHWATERMARKSETBACK

21-45!"

241m:

59m2(MIN)

GROSS FLOORAREA 30 MIN)

10m

11m (MAX)

40,900

LOT FRONTAGE BUILDINGHEIGHT

LOTCOVERAGE

2.7% 188.9m

10,000m2(MIN)

3m (MIN) 10m (MIN)

um 82ng

InmIMINI

INT’SY EXT.SY 5% (MAX) 91m (MIN)

LOTAREA

“MKS

24.850"

30m (MIN)

PROPOSED REQUIRED DATA ZONING LIMITED SERVICE RES DENTIAL WATERFRONT

DETAILS OF DEVELOPMENT

‘

I‘

‘

\»

‘

TOP

/—–~

" *

—

LAW 15 was

EXISTING

PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY JOHN H. KENNEDYLTD ONTARIOLAND SURVEYOR DATED JANUARY 9. 2018

PART 1 I’IIAN IIIREGGZB

‘

.‘

“(745128

mm mvu mv m

EXISTING PRO PAN E

31.097 TRANSFORM PROPANE TANK

INS’I’ No

ROAD ALLOWANCE BE’I‘I’VI‘JENLO’I’S 5 &

CLOSED BY By

. PROPOSED ADDITION 33mg A‘T GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION

BOTTOM OF RIDGE

.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DRILLED WELL LOCATEDBENEATH WOODEN DECK

EXISTING OBSERVATORY

(REFER TO c—loa)

or RIDGE

Page 47 of 68

Page 48 of 68

VAS E!

Page 49 of 68 V

”

,,,w.,¥-__,

‘51!

gag-7M”

Ex:

k’Q

77.5713?

”939T

77777

GENEIEIEDS

Bull!”991W"

___7,,¢L

b‘

’1‘

5 c

“7*

”0—6

LUOOJ N\OPU!N\

‘———

’7”’

’

\l “7

GMd

”OHE

: J“-

L,_ \

777777

‘o

. ‘

180 “vgxuoe

‘

Auued

,k/. vii”

I ,.O‘.8

7'77

Q _0

”ZN[‘13

180/de

‘

“

}

‘

L. “vgxuoe-z

’

;

MOI-1E?

AHLNEI

”as

‘

777777

Hz/rrrnsg

g” /

E g

777

“7

‘

l MLLLLALJILMLLJ‘

777’

‘77

‘

j) SNINMV“8mm aaAo aaxu “99m“: (Xv)

zééf—k” “WHEN

BNINIG

3U!|!93P31In9’\£1

ALE—1.2111;

ONINMV"spews name(13de ”999479(xv)

030 HEM/\OW

3827777777

,,,,,,,,,

7777I.z7/7I7I’?-7vT777777777

7777777?

Anued

NO 2,

| V

..vz-z

NO»779

‘3

*1 a0;

PUE‘IS! Homes

’

Memes “oz ‘uw

N3H31l>l

‘7

‘

’

samaols IM 8000

233G H?dd?

n7)?”

Bumasodmda. @

g7 ”1 I" L5;

H H—

’

E” a m 0. 5

‘0 m 00

D H

000.19

1170“",9

’VAeél

‘0:

5717

Page 50 of 68

1/;

2,,7

I I I

I I

,777

I I

CI I3 ,: fivgifs 777%:77 72/1713: iI

V‘IOBHEICI

I I I

:::::

“77.0%?

“2/1909

77777777777777” 7

‘5WOOHCIEIH

UNI/\II

Page 51 of 68 EDVdSW/VWED

Ai?li?

HDVHOLS

am :1 /9/z sum nu

LOL‘O

was“

4mm

W10

umum puma

umumN

i EEHS

n-zwuranwns-w)

:3 l0

um We

ogzn

nuvrm

mumu

-: Hum

M’HII‘

)Iuomaunoua

. w

“?lms

rllu

SNOISIAEH

—

wwva mm nww ?ll

DNILS 3

HSKHOJSNVHL {)NIJSIXE

HELLER030M!

I# )RIVKHONEH

:o-&,-a

WLQ‘EQI :NOLLVAE’IC! SIS

MIN-ma

NOLDNILNVH

19m Duwuna

w; uma

ammo purl Hum

(en) undo sum ammo mourn unoa Innlou m - on man

uondposec]

MEVEH 80:! GEDSSI

SEWOH GUOONOO

:va

—

“HUGS

Mapmpwo

.MVZ

9303 ‘7 Amusing

OVOH NOS‘IIMSEWVI‘93H

SNIHEENISNE

CILIII’I

—

NV’ld EIJJSSNOIJJCINOOBNILSIXEI

QS‘ZOOVZ‘ME)

he (Show

Page 52 of 68 n-wovzv-tna M

wad-w

wilds and-s —

|
|

81$

1NOILVA3’IG

2)? )IHVNHONGS

“188991

)[NVL

38991191

NV‘ld I .I.HV<I

ENVdOHcI DNLISIXH

‘

‘motl . .

‘

BERN/LEM ON .LSNI 9861431

MV’I’ MI Ml

(II’ISO’II)

scan;

onustxa

am .LoH

J ,/

..“__ w

”,0..—

AHOLVAEIEISHO DNIJSIXI!

)[OIIG NEGOOM HJN‘ENEE GELVDO’I 113M GE’T’IIHCIDNLLSIXS d0 NOILVDO’IEILVKIXOHddV‘

‘

:10 “01.1408

‘

8108 ‘6 AHVIINVI‘(ISLVG uomuns GNV’I OIEVLNO (LL’I AGENNIDI ‘H NHOI‘ A8 0130le!“ AWGNHOH madoud

9 \’ 9 SLO’! NbllilM.l.DlUHDNVMO’I’IV (IVOH

OSZWE’IVOS

zom\oom\n=~.‘ud\e

NV’Id EIJJS SNILSIXEM/

—

6%“

I‘Mwnw-wm

WM.”

.m-mm.‘

)IlIOMCIN?OlIE)

93/.

(CID) “lilo

—

m mm:

mm.

SNOISIASU

2»? xmuona’a

als

zuouvmm

02mm

‘

mam

‘ l \

|‘\

I‘

n—wmvw-a

snuSIxa

HSNHOJSNVHJ. ?NILSIX?

21:11.3}!

I# mnuousa

“Imam

mar szu

-‘EITv/OS OSZ’L

:Nomma’m HIS

—

m\u6xuo “\wu

mae‘sgt

[Mm-no

=>1HVWHON38

NOIJleOSECI

.a d’?. £11,”,ng

Imoum-muun

auluaamoua

m…”

0927!

Hod CEHSSI

onmuo amount

Mama

NOILV/G‘E

data may szoz’nuvnuaag

SHWOHGHOONOO

“LP?“

(NOB

“33,49

‘°““’"”°“‘““’

c ,0

x»zwyz-Ma(m~vs—w)

NV’Id SIMS

—

NOS’IIMSBWVP93H

saw 9m

8010

was“

QS‘ZOOVZ-MB

on stalls/z hefmczolw

Page 53 of 68 w-Ns and-s -

)INVJ.

ENVdOHcI DNIlSIXCi

mnm?www

NV’ld I JAIVd

‘

“16019

‘/

‘

SNVdOHd

)INVL

EH MV’]

‘

;

‘,

’

‘

NOILVAE’IS 8001:!

0N .ISNI 9861

DNLLSIXI-l ?anaoaskva;

REIGN)”

‘

GHSO’IJ)

(WON

‘

300121 30 “0.1.1.08

‘

’

‘

, ‘

‘

/ \—‘__~.____(“xx-x

AHOLVAHESEO {)NILSDL’EI

)[OEIU NEGOOM HJNHNZH (ISLVOO’I TIM ac-mmu DNILSIXEI210 NOILVOO’I ELVNIXOHddV

GNHOUD.LV gm“! NOILIGUV (IEISOdOHd

A8 $8

N 9 SLOW NHDIMJH H (HQ NVMO’ [“IV

239011“

9102 ’e mvnnvr cam HOAKAHGS mm omvmo an mama): ‘H NHOI‘ m aaamoud mvannoa uaadoad

‘

f ‘

on sm/s/z m

SOL-O

m —

“wwnNmfw

c [a 9 55,45

n—zom-m(muws~ua)

NDISEIGOlldEIS

SEWOHOUOONOO

SNO’SV‘EH

:mmwrmunua

if 4~

= arm—1 mos 9NLlSIX3 sNounno‘lvoaaauanls

33 01) 01

91/0 asn 324033243141 Ava/1000: > 31%! MOE

xma’tuvawomuvm

aoasyaswnnzao aasywasn.

CIEHONnd31033N NaAoM NON aa OJ. amxamaa uanu so vauy HL’NI’HOSd01 amus’xa 11v anus (e 83d 5»: uuvs aaa uanu £9080

anauaoaduod

aaoa omu’nne ouwmo uad sv snomnnmvo

asnOH NOILVNIWSMEO M015 SOVMES A‘IIVO

‘LNE‘IVNHUENO you mamas;

—_l 1.qu

oudas

AVON oio’z = (D) 1am

sums )mu

1ozo’v = awn1onxuv1 oudas wnwmm 1 ozo‘v= z XAVCIHmo‘z wunaalsas-

(aawuunoo

5%;

onluuo .mo” ““09

sumo

)IlIOMGNnOlIS

on LIN“

(no) loluo “MIDI

BNIHEENISNS

?lllll’l

lNEn’lddE

’lzim

‘

(ZN 9'8 080 Had SV 8311]! ”Br“!!! VSO Had SV NEENOS uaavs AHVONOOES‘5 CINV’HEl’IIA ‘SE’HAVE‘SHESIHHJ.W\GEddInOS 38 DJ. )lNVJ. OLLdES ‘e‘u‘s 9 ‘Z‘Z‘L’G080 Had SV aanusm EB “VHS SEND HOILnElHiSlG ONV HSGVEH 3H1 ‘E’C‘L’B318“. 080 Had SV SHOILVGVHDENDlS OUdES ‘C’S’L’B080 Had SV GELOI‘IHLSNODEH 0]. can HEJJIJ zBELON

‘aas

mm ._ F?wurzzavauvmvmoo

Avunow=zwooz<zwwzvauvuoo1a1v101AVG/1 sex.= oz< s’vz sxaawnN aumxu Avon009‘1 = swooxoass-

vsuwoou/saamxu

(0,038) 8'93

(0.033) 9‘22

mum mm W: —

09m

:awos

90”

HIS

HEN?O?SNVHl. DNIlSIXEl

33.1.37! OHGAH DNIlSIXE

1»! xmaonaa

“12.91191 :NoILVALm

3# XHVKHON’JEI

–—-— —_

01

NV’M I JNVd

‘\

‘

821911.qu

‘

)INVL

. W

(mason

W’

‘

W’ . .

‘

A8 GEGIAOHd AHVGNQOH madoad

”NV-‘4 HNVdOHd

Hdld OAd

‘

)INVWL

:19sz

‘

—

g??g?g?

7’

AHOLVAHSSEIODNIJSIXE

‘

”1030’? aasodoad

GSSOdOHd

)lo‘mlNimoom GSLVDO’I ‘I’IHAL DNILSIXH .10 NOLLVDO’IELVWIXOHddV ammo

Hmmaa

3mm noumqv

nouoa

1 ‘

—

mvauooas auv “2131.115 ‘suasm mm (madman ouaas (wnmum)

mam a

(138

DNIOVdS 0/0 wz’I SHLDNT‘I (was 91) wow .10 sum! :7 3am oAd GELVHOJHSd air-“noel

mm 0‘”

xooaoaa‘

amoad

Z? XVN 3? 22 MIN ® Edld HEWEH OJ. norm mm mm ewwoot wz’I oudas

—

11°34“

‘smagva

xtm

Him

‘

snaaaos mus magma

(mas

OHLVHOJXGJ¢u1uxom

9102 ‘6 mvmwr mama uoxzmms am omvmo um manna}; ‘H NHOI‘

DNU-SlXH HEWHOJSNWJ:

HNVdoud ONLLSIXB

ON .LSNI 9861—9‘1 .“V‘Inktl

aAuVN

““1100? .L ‘IIOS HAIWLVN

gums am oudas am (INVS 3mm Naama GEOV’Id alaava mmwan

———_———-——————_88991191

01: L 1|os

Hdld EAOHV ““1109 “[111le Sdld AAO’IEIHu““091 WQNINIK HNOLS OILdHS ””008

GNVS 038 313.131.!“”0914

‘

9 ‘79 9 SWLOFI NHHMJMH HONVMOTIV GVOH

—

m-wooszva M mam-u wads arms wovzwommwrww

N9 IS 3 G Olld 3 S W

. . “‘96 99‘ ‘NOI‘LVAC‘HS

—

mwwmo (WA-0a

:oDLLDIu‘A?Aa

MM”

NOlSNIiHVH

“5

Ma panama

—

wo/Nm91 > awn—1 1405 3mm, ((1,033) 1.02 = 5%, My =vauv mvmoo aaauwxa

uouduoseq

view madam

sma‘nuvnuaaa

GVOHNOS‘IIMSEWVI"98 ll

QS‘ZOOVZ’MB

l-atczwzolw

Page 54 of 68

Page 55 of 68 —

—

.//

BOTTOM OF RIDGE

f/ 7

’

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DISPERSAL BED DISTRIBUTION LATERAIS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED [RECEIVING FACILITY

EXPANDED CONTACT AREA 2.04ma ‘NO EXCAVATION 0R PLACEMENT OF MATERIALREQUIRED

7h -

30m SETBACK FROM CRCA MAXIMUMRECORDED WATER LEVEL

EXISTING WATER LEVEL OBSERVED 0N JANUARY 8, 2025 ELEVATION: 140.36m

QL’A

PROPOSED ADDITION 10m2

__HOT TUB

EXISTING

\APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING DRILLED WELL LOCATED BENEATH WOODEN DECK

—

_ _,

—

‘

0.103

SCALE:

‘III‘J‘III

[

PVC PIPE

100mm¢

TOPSOIL WITH 533”

BEDROCk

BED PROFILE mFILTER NTS

.‘

. .

100mm

PVC PIPE FROM SEPTIC TANK 1.2m 100mm¢ T0 HEADER PIPE 0 MIN 27: k MAX 4%

III/‘I’Q

PERFORA’I‘ED

NATIVE SOIL T = 10

‘I‘IHI‘I

750mm

FILTER BED SAND

300mm SEPTIC STONE MINIMUM 150mm BELOW PIPE MINIMUM50mm ABOVE PIPE

viIH

NATIVESOILT=10

BET WEE N

m m mv wo ov wo z

I’AR’I’ I PLA N

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PLACED BETWEEN THE NATIVE SAND AND SEPTIC STONE

200mm

—–—–—

PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY JOHN H. KENNEDY LTD ONTARIO LAND

ROAD

TANK EXISTING P R O HOS] I, 3D BY BX’-‘I.AI' 15—P 1986A N AI..I_.OWANCE E

EXISTING TRANSFORMER

PROPANE

/ <‘/

SURVEYOR DATED JANUARY9. 2018 _ ————-—

BOTTOM OF RIDGE

PROPOSED 4.020L (MINIMUM)SEPTIC TANK EOUIPPEDWITH RISERS. BAFFLES, EFFLUENT FILTER, AND SECONDARY SAFETY SCREENS

‘

EXISTING OBSERVATORY

WI). IOOmn’m PERFORATED PVC PIPE 4 RUNS OP 4.60m (15 FEET) LENGTHS 1.2m C/C SPACING

TOP OF RIDGE

DETECTABLE SEWER TAPE

PUMPED CRUSHED AND REMOVED

EXISTING SEPTIC TANK TO BE

ELEVATION: 142.32m

MAXIMUMRECORDED WATER LEVEL

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CRCA

March 5, 2025

File: MV/FRS/291/2024

Sent by E-mail Mr. Noah Perron, Planner Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario K0H 2T0 Dear Mr. Perron: Re:

Application for Permission (S. 45(2)) PL-ZNA- 2025-0010 1125 James Wilson Rd; Pt Lot 6, Concession 5, Part 1 Plan 13R6090 Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Canoe Lake

Cataraqui Conservation staff have reviewed the above-noted application for permission and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration based on our role as the commenting agency responsible for natural hazards on Planning Act applications, and as administrator of Ontario Regulation 41/24: Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits. Proposal The proposal involves the reconstruction and enlargement of an existing legal non-conforming residential dwelling and attached deck on the subject property. Permission is required to: • Reduce the required setback from the highwater mark from 30 m, as required by Section 5.8.2 a) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 19.17 m to permit the construction of the new building and attached deck. Site Description The subject lands are located along the southern shore of Canoe Lake in South Frontenac Township. Access to the property is provided by James Wilson Road. The subject lands are developed with an existing single detached dwelling, accessory structures, and dock. The shoreline is rocky and vegetated. The topography of the site varies. Discussion Cataraqui Conservation’s scope of review for this proposal includes the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the Shoreline of Sydenham Lake. Natural Hazards / Ontario Regulation 41/24 Flooding: The maximum recorded water level for Canoe Lake is 142.15 m GSC. For Canoe Lake, the maximum recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered flood plain. Cataraqui Conservation’s Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation 41/24 require that all new

Page 56 of 68

Page 2 of 2 development be setback back a minimum of 6 m from the regulatory floodplain of a waterbody. Based on elevation mapping and the site plan submitted with the application, staff are satisfied that the proposed development will be located outside of the flooding hazard and applicable setback. Erosion: Cataraqui Conservation defines the extent of the potential erosion hazard to include an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for bedrock of 1(v):1(h), plus an erosion access allowance of 6 m. Based on elevation mapping and the site plan provided, the proposed development is sufficiently setback from the erosion hazard. Therefore, staff have no concerns with the application from an erosion perspective. To ensure long-term erosion avoidance and slope stability, staff recommend the maintenance and enhancement of a healthy buffer of native vegetation between buildings/structures and the water, to help stabilize soils into the long-term. Runoff from buildings and structures and other hardened surfaces should also be directed away from the shoreline to a naturally vegetated location where infiltration can occur. Recommendation Cataraqui Conservation staff have no objection to the approval of application PLZNA 2025-0010 based on our consideration for natural hazard and regulatory policies. Staff recommend implementation of the above-noted best practice measures (in bold text) and advise the applicant that if the proposed development is approved, Cataraqui Conservation permit approval will be required. Ontario Regulation 41/24 Please note that development within 30 m of the shoreline on the subject lands is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by the CRCA. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e.g. development and site alteration) to a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as flooding and erosion, and that the changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. If approved, the proposed development will require Cataraqui Conservation permit approval. The landowner(s) should contact Cataraqui Conservation’s office at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under O. Reg. 41/24. Please inform this office of any decision made by the Committee with regard to these applications. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 239, or by e-mail at estucke@crca.ca Sincerely,

Emma Stucke, MCIP, RPP Resource Planner Cataraqui Conservation 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca

Page 57 of 68

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Development Services Department

Date of Meeting:

March 13, 2025

Subject:

Permission Application (S. 45(2) of Planning Act) PL-ZNA-2025-0010, Widrow, 1125 James Wilson Road, Bedford District

Summary This report recommends that the Committee of Adjustment grant approval of this application for permission to enlarge a legal non-conforming dwelling under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, subject to conditions. Background Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Limited-Service Residential Waterfront Relief Requested The applicant seeks permission under section 45(2) of the Planning Act to enlarge the legal non-conforming dwelling on the property within 30 metres of the highwater mark of Canoe Lake. Related Applications The lands are not subject to any additional applications under the Planning Act. Property Description The subject property is 2.7Ac (~10,900sqm) in area with frontage on the east shore of Canoe Lake. The property has no public road frontage but is accessed via a driveway off James Wilson Road, which extends east through two neighbouring properties. Existing development consists of a single dwelling with attached deck and two detached storage sheds. Except in the immediate area of existing development, the property features and abundance of mature tree and vegetation growth, including along portions of the shoreline area. The area of the existing dwelling is mostly flat, before sloping downwards towards the shoreline. To the west of the dwelling, topography slopes upwards slightly before sloping downwards towards the shoreline, forming a small ridge. The surrounding area consists of residential development.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 58 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

Proposal The subject property is presently developed with a ~142sqm dwelling with ~130sqm attached deck. The applicants are proposing to renovate the existing main floor, removing ~40sqm (15.1ft by 28.3ft) portion of the dwelling on the non-waterfront side of the building and replacing it with a two-storey addition with 68.8sqm ground floor area (19.3ft by 38.3ft), or a gross floor area of 137.6sqm. The northwestern corner of the main floor is also to be squared off, adding approximately 3.2sqm (2.1ft by 16.5ft) of additional area. The applicants also proposed to reconfigure the existing attached deck, covering and screening in a 29sqm (310sqft) area on the waterside of the building. The reconfiguration of the attached deck would also reduce its overall footprint from approximately 130sqm to 120sqm. The proposal would increase gross floor area of the building to ~272sqm. The building height would increase from 7m to 10m. The existing setback of the dwelling (24.8m) and attached deck (19.1m) to the highwater mark would remain unchanged. Department and Agency Comments Cataraqui Conservation comments were not received at the time of writing this report. CRCA comments will be shared with the Committee at the public meeting. Building Services indicated that the applicant must apply for a review of performance level of the existing sewage system at the building permit stage. Public Services were not circulated the application due to the subject property not having frontage on a public road. Public Comments No comments were received at the time of writing this report. Planning Analysis The Township Official Plan Schedule designates the subject property as Rural and the property is zoned RLSW by Zoning By-law 2003-75. The dwelling is a permitted use. Section 5.10.2 of the Zoning By-law states that existing buildings with less than the minimum 30m setback from the highwater mark of waterbody may be repaired, renovated, or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. This provision prohibits the enlargement of these existing buildings, without seeking permission from the Committee of Adjustment. The Zoning By-law considers the existing seasonal dwelling as a legal non-conforming building because it was constructed prior to the current Zoning By-law and is setback 24.8m from the highwater mark of Canoe Lake. Through its powers under section 45(2) of the Planning Act, the Committee of Adjustment may grant permission to enlarge the dwelling. The criteria for considering an application under Section 45(2) are: •

Whether the application is desirable for the appropriate development of the subject property; and www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 59 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

•

Whether the application will result in undue adverse impacts on surrounding properties and the neighbourhood.

The existing dwelling is presently setback 24.8m from the highwater mark of Canoe Lake with the attached deck being setback 19.1m. The current setback of the dwelling and attached deck to the highwater mark would remain unchanged. The existing setback of the dwelling (~13m) and deck (~7m) to the top of bank will also remain unchanged. The proposal consists of additional area being added to the main floor, a partial second storey being added, and a portion of the attached deck being covered and screened in. Additionally, the applicant proposes to reconstruct the existing deck mostly within its current envelope. The proposal would facilitate an increase in gross floor area from approximately 142sqm to 272sqm. The proposed reconstruction of the existing deck would reduce its overall footprint from 130sqm to 120sqm. However, the proposal would facilitate an increase in ground floor area from 272sqm to 294sqm (Lot coverage increase from 2.5% to 2.7%). As a result of the partial second storey, the building height of the existing dwelling would increase from 7m to 10m. The proposal would ultimately contribute additional living space to the existing dwelling. The proposed design has consideration for existing site conditions, avoiding unnecessary tree clearance and site alteration within 30m of the lake and occupying a similar building footprint. It is the opinion of Planning Staff, that the application is desirable for the appropriate development of the subject property. The proposed enlarged dwelling is not anticipated to result in any negative or intrusive impacts on surrounding properties or the lake. Any potential intrusion would be mitigated by existing tree coverage along the shoreline. It is the opinion of Planning Staff, that the application is unlikely to result in undue adverse impacts on surrounding properties of the neighbourhood. Planning Staff recommend that a development agreement be registered on the title of the subject property as a condition of approval. The development agreement will address matters related to erosion control, runoff management and the maintenance of a healthy shoreline buffer. This will ensure that appropriate shoreline development practices are being implemented to not impact the environmental quality of Canoe Lake. Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that it is appropriate for the Committee of Adjustment to grant permission to expand the legal non-conforming dwelling on the property, as described in this report. Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Hearing was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, at least 10 days in advance of the Public Hearing. This included notice given: • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 60 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 60 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

•

by posting on the Townships current planning applications webpage

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and, pending comments received, approve application PL-ZNA-2025-0010 for 1125 James Wilson Road, subject to the following conditions:

Permission is granted to enlarge the existing legal non-conforming dwelling. The enlarged dwelling is permitted to have a gross floor area of 272sqm and a building height of 10m. The enlarged dwelling and reconfigured attached deck are permitted to have a building footprint of 294sqm. The enlarged dwelling and reconfigured deck are permitted to establish the same setback from the highwater mark of Canoe Lake as the existing, 24.8m for the dwelling and 19.1m for the attached deck. The location of the enlarged dwelling and attached decks shall be consistent with the submitted plot plan (Drawing C-102, Groundwork Engineering, February 4, 2025) and building plans (1125 James Wilson Road Rev4, Concord Homes) that will be attached to the Decision as Schedule “A”.
The Owner is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the following matters and environmental standards of the Township: a. Appropriate erosion control measures (e.g. silt fence, straw bales) must be used during construction and until the site is stable and revegetated. b. Roof runoff will be directed away from Canoe Lake and discharged to natural or constructed leaching pits/areas to maximize infiltration or onto coarse rock rubble splash pads to reduce the velocity of runoff. c. A natural vegetated buffer must be maintained in its natural state within 30 metres of Canoe Lake, except in the immediate area of the building envelope.
A building permit is required for ALL proposed demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac. Report Prepared By: Noah Perron, Planner Report Reviewed By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Manager of Planning www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 61 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

Exhibit A Photo 1 – Front view of existing dwelling (Looking south from the shoreline of Canoe Lake)

Photo 2 – Rear of existing dwelling

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 62 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

Photo 3 – Front view showing existing attached deck

Photo 4 – West side (location of proposed screened-in porch)

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 63 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report PL-ZNA-2025-0010

Photo 5 – East side (Location of proposed main floor addition & partial second Storey)

Photo 6 – View of shoreline area to the west and north

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 64 of 68

To:

Committee of Adjustment

From:

Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk

Report Date:

March 13, 2025

Subject:

Decisions on Delegated Consents, February to March 2025

Summary This report summarizes the Consent applications that have been approved by Brad Wright, Director of Development Services, between February 13, 2025 and March 13, 2025.

Background The authority to grant undisputed consents is delegated to the Director of Development Services under By-law 2020-27. This report lists the applications which met the criteria for being undisputed consents and have received provisional consent approval.

Discussion a) PL-BDJ-2024-0139 – Storrington District Approved on March 4, 2025 The application is for the creation of one new rural residential lot from property at 3024 Orser Road. The severed parcel will be 12 acres in area with 150 metres frontage on Orser Road. It contains a dwelling and several accessory buildings. The vacant retained parcel will be 78 acres in area with 200 metres frontage on Orser Road. b) PL-BDJ-2025-0006 – Portland District Approved on March 4, 2025. The application is for a 2-acre rural residential lot addition to be conveyed from 4255 Camden Portland Boundary Road to 4275 Camden Portland Boundary Road. c) PL-BDJ-2025-0007 – Portland District Approved on March 4, 2025. The application is for the creation of one new rural residential lot from property at 4255 Camden Portland Boundary Road. The severed parcel will be 6.5 acres in area with 175m frontage. The retained lands will be 75 acres in area with 200 metres frontage.

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 65 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report – Decisions on Delegated Consents

a) PL-BDJ-2024-0124 – Storrington District Approved on March 7, 2025. The application is for a 12-acre rural residential lot addition to be conveyed from unaddressed lands fronting on Sands Road to property at 4293 Milburn Road.

Appendix A – Mapping of application(s) Report Prepared By: Kate Kaestner, Planning Clerk Report Approved By: Christine Woods, Manager of Planning

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 66 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report – Decisions on Delegated Consents

APPENDIX A

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 67 of 68

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report – Decisions on Delegated Consents

www.southfrontenac.net South Frontenac is a welcoming and thriving rural community.

Page 68 of 68

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.