Committee Of Adjustment - 14 Jun 2018 - Agenda

Published June 14, 2018

Word Count 22997 words

Reading Time 108 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: June 14, 2018 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2018/Committee Of Adjustment - 14 Jun 2018 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Thursday, June 14, 2018 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

Resolution

Adoption of Agenda

Declaration of pecuniary interest

Approval of Minutes – [May 10, 2018]

Resolution

Validation Orders

Mary Cecilia Stewart -Concession 7, Part Lot 1, Vanluven Road, District of Portland - Validation of parcel creation from 1970

George Greer - Concession 8, Part Lot 6, Milburn Road, District of Storrington - Validation of parcel creation from 1975

Minor Variance Applications From Previous Meetings

MV-48-17-B -Kurt Stouffer and Ronald Stouffer - Concession 12, Part Lot 4, 8420 Perth Road, District of Bedford - Variance to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water

New Consent Applications:

S-27-18-S - Barbara & John Bird - Concession 10, Part Lot 6, Pitch Pine Island, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot

10 - 16

S-38-18-S - Bryan Stoness - Concession 9, Part Lot 22/23, Carrying Place Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a lot addition

17 - 22

4-9

S-38-18-S - Bryan Stoness - Concession 9, Part Lot 22/23, Carrying Place Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a lot addition c)

S-40-18-L - Sally VanLuven (Mike Howe) - Concession 7, Part Lot 5, Rutledge Road/Sally Lane, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a lot addition

23 - 25

S-41-18-P - Theresa McPherson - Concession 11, Part Lot 19, First Lake Road, District of Portland - Consent to create a new lot

26 - 29

S-42-18-B - Joan McSorley - Concession 3, Part Lot 5, McGowan Lane, District of Bedford - Consent to create a lot addition

30 - 31

S-43-18-P - Orville & Lori Hamilton - Concession 6, Part Lot 4, Jamieson Road, District of Portland - Consent to create a new lot

32 - 34

S-44-18-S - Jason & Michelle Thompson - Concession 11, Part Lot 35, Stafford Lane, District of Storrington - Consent to create a lot

35 - 36

Page 1 of 97

addition h)

S-45-18-S - Eunice Sleeth - Concession 9, Part Lot 1, Lower Round Lake Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot

37 - 42

S-46-18-P - Wayne Young - Concession 2, Part Lot 4, Quinn Road, District of Portland - Consent to create a new lot

43 - 58

S-47-18-P - Everett Kerr - Concession 5, Part Lot 6, Road 38, District of Portland - Consent to create a lot addition

59 - 61

S-48-18-L - Helen & Spencer Storms (Jeff Bennett) - Concession 5, Part Lot 6, Storm Haven Lane, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a lot addition

62 - 63

S-50-18-S - 548883 Ontario Limited - Concession 8, Part Lot 15/16, Hiawatha Lane, District of Storrington - Consent to create a right-ofway

64 - 65

S-49-18-L - Sally VanLuven (Hutchings) - Concession 5, Part Lot 7, Sheila Lane, District of Loughborough - Consent to create a lot addition

66 - 68

S-52-18-L - Sally VanLuven (Jennings) - Concession 5, Part Lot 7, Sheila Lane, District of Loughborough- Consent to create a lot addition S-53-18-L - Sally VanLuven (Dorman) - Concession 5, Part Lot 7, Sheila Lane, District of Loughborough- Consent to create a lot addition S-54-18-L - Sally VanLuven (Sigsworth) - Concession 5, Part Lot 7, Sheila Lane, District of Loughborough- Consent to create a lot addition 8.

New Minor Variance Applications:

MV-04-18-B - Guy Marchildon - Concession 10, Part Lot 8, Island 50, Devil Lake, District of Bedford - Variance to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water to 20 metres for construction of a dwelling

69 - 75

MV-10-18-L - Douglas and Sylvia Shelley - Concession 3, Part Lot 10, 3771 Daley Road, District of Loughborough - Variance to permit a reduction in side yard for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling

76 - 78

MV-11-18-S - Tim Greenlees - Concession 1, Part Lot 52, 1015 Sandpiper Lane, District of Storrington - Variance to permit an increase in footprint of an existing dwelling within the 30 metre setback from water during reconstruction

79 - 81

MV-12-18-S - William and Kimberly Powis - Concession 2, Part Lot 20/21, 2632 Green Bay Road, District of Bedford - Variance to permit

82 - 84

Page 2 of 97

construction of a detached accessory building in the front yard e)

MV-13-18-L - Gordon Burns - Concession 6, Part Lot 25, Sand Island, Loughborough Lake, District of Loughborough - Varaince to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water to 15 metres for construction of a dwelling

Other Business

Application Fee for Gord Burns Minor Variance

Adjournment

Resolution

85 - 97

Page 3 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: December 7, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-48-17-B Kurt Stouffer, Ronald Stouffer Concession 12, Lot/Part Lot 4, 8420 Perth Road, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.10.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of a dwelling within 30m of the water and section 8.3.1 to permit a reduction in front yard Date of Hearing: December 14, 2017

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of a dwelling within the 30 metre setback from water be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 0.92 +/- acres with frontage on Pollywog Lake and Perth Road. The property is currently developed with multiple detached accessory buildings. There was a trailer on the property which has recently been removed. The proposal is for the construction of a 24 foot by 40 foot (960 square feet) seasonal dwelling to be located a minimum of 14.6 metres (48 feet) from the high water mark of Pollywog Lake. The topography of the property is stepped with two plateaus separated by two rock cliffs. The proposed location of the dwelling is on the lower of the two plateaus up against the rock cliff. There is a hydro line which runs along the edge of the upper plateau which drastically limits the ability for the applicant to increase the setback from the water. To obtain the 48 foot setback from the water the applicant is requesting a reduction in front yard from 20 metres to 12 metres. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. The Planning Department is able to support the application.

FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Residential Waterfront (RW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Page 4 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments were not required from KFL&A Public Health as the applicant has indicated there is to be no plumbing in the dwelling. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections to the application as submitted. Comments from Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a 960 square foot dwelling to be located a minimum of 14.6 metres (48 feet) from the high water mark of Pollywog Lake.
Minor variance MV-48-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Stouffer Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 5 of 97

STOUFFER MV-48-17-B

Legend Stouffer Property

PE RT H

Stouffer Proposed Cottage

Proposed Cottage Pollywog Lake Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Subject Property

While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 6 of 97

Scale 1:627 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

24 Meters

Page 7 of 97

Page 8 of 97

The CRCA, under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interferencewith Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, regulates development within 15 metres of a Valley land. The Valley of Pollywog Lake is considered to extend inland to the top of the high rock slope adjacent to the shoreline. It appears that the proposed dwelling is within 15 metres of the top of Valley. Therefore, a CRCA permit will be required for the proposed development. The applicant will be required to contact the undersigned at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under Ontario Regulation 148/06. Please notify this of?ce of any decision made by the Committee of Adjustment with regard to this application. If you have any questions, please contact Andrew Schmidt at (613) 546-4228 extension 244 or by email at aschmidt@crca.ca.

Yours truly,

Andrew Schmidt, C.Tech. Supervisor, Development Review /as c.c.

Kurt Stouffer, 1808 State Route 69, Camden, New York, 13316 Lindsay Mills, Planner, Township of South Frontenac (Via email)

Page 3 of 3

Page 9 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-27-18-S Barbara Bird and John Bird Concession 10, Pt. Part Lot 6, Pitch Pine Island, Loughborough Lake, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of a 6.3 +/- acre island with frontage on Loughborough Lake, known as Pitchpine Island (PIN 362900385). The land is currently developed with two dwellings and multiple detached accessory buildings. Each dwelling has a dedicated septic system and water source. The application is to divide the island in half along an east-west plane for the creation of a 3 +/- acre lot with the retained parcel also being 3 +/- acres in size. Each 3 +/- acre parcel will include a single dwelling and associated septic system. While the usual requirement for new lot creation on an island, as per the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75, is for both the severed and retained parcels to be a minimum of five acres in size, the Official Plan provides direction for exceptions when there are multiple existing dwellings on a single parcel. One of the conditions of severance will be that both the severed and retained parcels are rezoned to reflect the undersized lots. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Island (RLSI) Application Complies with Zoning: No Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from Public Works were not required. KFL&A Public Health have no objections to the proposal as both dwellings already have septic systems and there is sufficient space on each of the lots to be created for a replacement system if needed. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objection to the proposal as both the severed and retained parcels already contain existing development and there is considerable area for future development to occur outside of the water setback. They have indicated that future development on the property may require a permit.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-27-18-L shall be for the creation of a 3 +/acre lot on Pitchpine Island (PIN 362900385). The severed and retained parcels shall each contain one of the existing dwellings.

Page 10 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be created through Consent Application S-27-18-S, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].

ATTACHMENTS Map of Bird property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 11 of 97

Loughborough Lake

BIRD S-27-18-S Proposed Lot

Legend Bird Property Bird Proposed Lot

Retained Parcel

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 12 of 97

Scale 1:1,250 0

40 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

l_I_l_I

l_l_lF

.9.

KFL& Public Health A

http://www.kflaph.ca

CONSENTTO SEVE R

Environmental Health Department

Receipt No: SK-18-201!

File Number: .

S-27-18-S Owner(s): Barbara & John Bird

Ward / Former Township: Storrington

Municipality: South Frontenac

Concession 10

Lot

Part(s),

Registered Plan:

Plan of Subdivision:

Sublot:

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and sewage, etc)

Severed:

New Lot-Rocky, septic location con?rmed

-house & shed on site -water drawn from lake —hydroeasement

Retained

-Rocky, septic location con?rmed -house -water drawn from lake “‘Note-If any future development should occur, new septic systems will probably be necessary.

soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water table with bar. Show estimated permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable. Retained

Depth of Soil

Severed

0.0 m 0.3 m 0.6 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m

N/A

Percolation rate (estimated): [min/cm]

Percolation rate (estimated):

NOTE: the approval of any new lot is based on its suitability to provide an area for a Class A septic tank system for an average 3 bedroom home. Approval to build a larger home on this lot will be subject to availability of sufficient area for a larger septic tank system.

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED

Conditions: Soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system. Speci?c requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. Any septic system in the future will have to be in areas with a minimum of 10 inches of native soil over rock.

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory Site Flexible Site Specific

RETAINED V.‘

Satisfactory

..l

Unsatisfactory

_ “‘

Site Flexible

V4 i

Site Specific

Conditions:

Inspector Miranda Iezzi , BA5c, CPHI(C)

Public Health Inspector

Soilconditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system. Speci?c requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. Any septic system in the future will have to be in areas with a minimum of 10 inches of native soil over rock.

Approved:

‘‘

U ‘__

Date:

‘

Lg) [&

PLEASE FORWARD A COPYOF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLICHEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health prog ms. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of EnvironmentalHealth, KFL&APublic Health, 221 PortsmouthAvenue Kingston, Ontar o K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 13 of 97

Memberof

1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, Ontario KOH1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956-CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E-mail: info@crca.ca Websites: www.crca.ca & www.cleanwatercataraqui.ca

Conservation

0 N TA RI 0

Natural Champions

Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0 Dear Ms. Kapusta:

Re: Application for Consent to Sever S-27-18—S(Bird) Lot 6, Concession 10; Pitch Pine Island Storrington Diat_trict. Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Loughborough Lake (East Basin) Lx

Staff of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) have reviewed the above-noted application for consent to sever and offer the following comments for the Land Division Committee’s consideration. The property was not visitedby CRCA staff.

The applicant has requested severance of a 1.2 ha parcel of land on an island with water frontage on Loughborough Lake (lot to be severed). The lot to be severed contains an existing cottage and associated development. The lot to be retained also contains an existing cottage and associated development. Both the lot to be severed and the retained lot are proposed to remain as residential properties.

As noted above, the subject property is an island that is located in the east basin of Loughborough Lake. CRCA mapping indicates that the property is relatively ?at with a low bank that drops down to the water. It consists of a mix of cleared lands and woodlands. Other than Loughborough Lake itself, there do not appear to be any other signi?cant environmental features on or directly adjacent to the subject property.

The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Limited Service Residential Island’ (RLSI) in the implementing Zoning By-law.

Page 14 of 97

nee‘ommenuation

Page 15 of 97

Page 16 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-38-18-S, S-39-18-S Bryan Stoness Concession 9, Pt. Part Lot 22/23, Carrying Place Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create two lot additions Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create two lot additions be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 2.94 +/- acres with frontage on Cranberry Lake. The land is currently vacant. The application is to divide the parcel in two and add the northern 1.1 +/- acre section, with approximately 160 metres of frontage on Carrying Place Road, to 4400 Carrying Place Road (S-3918-S) and to add the southern 1.4 +/- acre section, with approximately 75 metres of frontage on Carrying Place Road, to 4242 Carrying Place Road (S-38-18-S). These lot additions will have the effect of reducing potential development along the shoreline of Cranberry Lake as three waterfront lots will become two. The lot addition to 4242 Carrying Place will significantly increase the road frontage of the lot from 10 metres to approximately 85 metres which brings the lot into conformity with the Comprehensive Zoning By-law. The planning department is able to support the applications. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) and Residential Waterfront (RW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health were not required. Public Works have no objections to the proposal. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objection to the proposal.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-38-18-S shall be for the creation of a 1.4 +/acre lot addition only to 4242 Carrying Place Road (PIN 362880767).
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-39-18-S shall be for the creation of a 1.1 +/acre lot addition only to 4400 Carrying Place Road (PIN 362880558).
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner:

Page 17 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 5. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 6. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 7. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 for each of the parcels to be created through Consent Applications S-38-18-S and S-39-18-S, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].

ATTACHMENTS Map of Stoness property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 18 of 97

Lot To Be Enlarged 4400 Carrying Place Road

STONESS S-38-18-S S-39-18-S

Legend Stoness Property S-38-18-S

4389 Carrying Place Road

S-39-18-S

Cranberry Lake

Lot To Be Enlarged 4242 Carrying Place Road Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

4175 Carrying Place Road

Page 19 of 97

Dog Lake

N YI R R

A PL

4214 Carrying Place Road

Scale 1:2,170 0

80 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

VVa[€1’VV3V

l)cw:inp1nmt Rcvicxx‘‘I‘c;2’xn r|.|.-.r-.-IIII

||…|| Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant ‘HI;South Frontenac of Township I = I1—’ I: P.O. Box 100 I.|_|II| Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

-.-

Dear Ms. Kapusta: Re: I.

I—|.|.|—I.-|.|.I.-Zn for Consent Application to Sever S-38-18-S (Stoness) |.|.-I|. ‘-I—lI.I.|.–jut-l.I-I-I-l.l-I-I-I-I Part Lots 22, 23, Concession 9; Roll N 0. 070060244040000 |||l 6 on Plan 13R-6895; -.1 Part Carrying I—|..r|l|Place Road lzrl-j.I1-j. of South Frontenac (Storrington) Township In-1 l||…|_..|. Cranberry Lake Waterbody:

Staff of the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the ‘jIZICataraqui Region Conservation Authority and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted (CRCA) —’—? I?ffl I—-’ u“’“““I‘u"Iu —I application for consent to sever and offer the following comments for the Land Division Committee’s III-?? consideration.

The applicant has requested severance of a 1.1 hectare parcel of land into two parts that are to be added IIIII-I-Iljh with municipal staff to that the -IZIJJJJ-If of staff through discussions -IJI—II-II-adjacent properties. It I is I11the understanding lot to be severed (northern triangular shaped parcel) will be approximately 0.45 hectares in size and is -IjI’proposed Pu retained I—I-I-IL to be I-I—IZ

-I-I-F1I1I Place Road. The –I1added to -E the adjacent property described as 4400 Carrying lot " ' (southern parcel) be will hectares approximately 0.57 size and is be in proposed added the II_I’II’ZI to to property —I—fI’I—I1 1TI——‘I III‘ n’—’— TTI I:-— described as 4242 Carrying Place Road. -III’——‘u11I1I

I——’-I-‘rlrI-I-I—I-I–j-I-I.I The property is located on the east side of Carrying Place Road and the severed and retained parcels “–l—:I-I—I-have water frontage onto Cranberry I_ Lake. Based review of our mapping, both the lot to be |__|.l_|…|.I-_ ||… upon a.|.--….|..|–|.–|. severed and the retained lot appear to be vacant. I’f—2”:—’n’IIf} The I—?JIf1IJ-III-I IJI’—‘IIuIf——?-I£n’uIEI£J-fI-Iproperty is currently designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and ‘Limited Service Residential’ (RLS) in the implementing Zoning By-law for South Frontenac Township. Cranberry Lake itself is I—IjI-—[-I-I—I-I identi?ed is zoned ‘Environmental the Zoning By-law. -‘E1-I I— Protection’ (EP) in ‘-£1 -II’

in One§inMvirQnn1e%nt Working’E‘ogether Imrw-iii! (‘T;:;tafac}3ui

Parks L%1ana«2L§a-EiideauCanal %-’:w—7w9=

(.;(:nsei’vati0n.*‘&t:l§‘2()rity Ridezw-“al}ey § A

%%swa92-3571

Region Conservation Authurity i:y13—5a;sa–$328

Page 20 of 97

Ms. u…J:I…..-|.|I|u|I:I|| Jennie Kapusta (S-3 8-18-S) June 6, 2018

Discussion T’hr1?iEn’inEE:1’H'1H.Th’hI:ppH-:HmIrE:n’i.?mnuI$.u?%h|L[?r:th; The main interests of the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. ?ooding :n|’.:II:-III];-n.:|.::|‘I|1’?:h.::h:I’:I.:I.In1’I!i-l’r|I LIhI.’.h.I|:I’:IIi::|:|’|‘1:|IIdn’-q’nIJ’:I.IrE:|‘l: and the protection of the water quality of the erosion) associated with the shoreline of Cranberry Lake, and the the cultural and natural and scenic values of the Rideau i.’.l1H conservation of heritage lake, Canal l.£u.mE1ua1Irrun.a|&laJm?udr.:hni.il-n,‘udmlT:1i’L—a|?l?L?in am, |’.luH’|:I.I.I1|l:In’.I’|.’.l|1.I..||’.‘I |:I’|I.’.|E5-|’:|:| -:.ru;.r|.| 1|;-|q.? National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Natural Hazards I1::E—:1’h’n=:n.:Lrmn’:hdr:u’|rII.!n’I2:uh-u::rLlhu?HJjug-?n: The maximum recorded water level for Cranberry Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. For Flooding: Pa.?ood Cranberry Lake, the maximum recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered Th plain. The 1h’nhIT5’L£u.?ln:rInm:u’I’?dt:h'2n?Iudu1afmu,p’|.u’:??an£rlLh. IIT|E|’.i.‘I FI’:I.r|:| Guidelines for Implementing Ontario Regulation CRCA’s i.’|’.IJu’lul|I.I.I.|‘r.I"I1’.p’..l’I.m’i1,| 148/06 (see description below) requires that F!I’;IJ.l|?.|-IlTI1:ul.luIl.11F.11"nlr.||rrq’||II1.I;|;.|4 all development be set back a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. IJI1!-?Ip?I?H?’!HEIEi.?HE¢§IE?l??:-h?t?ili??p?hh??l?flr?wh?g. Based upon a review of relevant mapping, staff have determined that both the lot to be severed and the H-IuJ.mIrmirwLErdnu1:qIp:?HJHll?I1-lmnhuilldh??uldwbrnnundudll nddadldrllplu-Hxdli?nllcunc?u?nnflhcn?-iE1u’inlh:dph5.LEIi?:I retained lot will provide additional area outside of the setback from the ?ood plain for future :|uI’.I:I-:I|::I.::dL:–:-::I.r::|th:‘I-:n:E:tn.|;jI:Ipn’L:I. development to occur on the bene?tting properties. Tb’:F:I’:I.:t:|‘I’b.’|:n:-:::I:-‘u’II|‘rIIthr.‘p:I|‘I’II.’ Therefore, staff have no concerns with the proposal from a ?ooding hazard perspective. Erosion: Section 5.8.2(2) of the Zoning By-law speci?es that no building or structure or septic tank EHIIIIIIII:15-H|1?5LE?:I?Tllr2ui:?Hyhhqu??b'1?mh?.Eh;wmnI.mmlq:ELl.uJ. i.:IEIlH.i-u.iIJJbu|-:ItIL’ri’.Er.nL:I.’n::I.:Ln|T|1I:::I|::I installation shall be located within a minimum of 15 metres horizontal of the top of bank of any E:I|‘I.::l.I.|I.I!’lh.‘I.gIuI”!|I:I:I-:I’n’.g.’ 1’h|:Ii;|IEI_’l.%nth|:.==l-:F mlI:I.hu.:::.‘i:Ii.:|:::IIId:i:h:I_|:I?.::’.iJ4.|!IL5’::uE:r%.|. the slope of which is greater than 30% from horizontal. The CRCA de?nes the extent of embankment, erosion hazards to include an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for rock of potential pltnct?-:l:ni:dJm1|d’mh:L?hInn’h’hlIm=.ItIhHIh?LInII’nfun:tar 1(h):l(v), plus an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. Based upon a review of relevant mapping, staff 1[|1] ||".I]]LI.I.J1I1’.nI’I1I.nnllIJ’.1’I.’:I:lI:J’-lrr.u’I.I. rLI.Il|:|’|.;uI1I.‘II.I1.IIIu’.‘.‘I’IIuII.II’rI1“;nI’.i_p|ff have determined both that the lot be severed and the retained lot will provide additional area outside to ?IHI1-HM1Hi1¢H’!Z¢i?Hi?H?-Ihiibli???l?i?i??t????i?t??i?lh??t the top of bank and erosion hazard allowances for future of development to occur on the bene?tting EI|T’:|:r:I|iI.IpI-cfllni.-lIJu’:Ir;wEnnmJIEI.rr:II:IuI|‘i.I |‘l|I:I’:E|.‘I.’:II.u:I:I-::?|un.ID.:LIn’l|I:I|!|I:::£|J.’:I.| p1$?1.i:.:h:‘rET;I?T3J??Jl?lu:J?iEIh?|.?!:ib::E-mi-Eln?i??ll?ht properties. Therefore, staff have no concerns with the proposal from an erosion hazard perspective. Water Quality 5.|.:nI’I’II|Iu1rE’|.I’|“rr.I.I|r.I’.|.|.Z Section (PPS) suggests that planning authorities should seek to Policy Statement 2.2 of the Provincial 2l’r.|l:.I lI.nl’l-1._’l’F"I.j|u.|lI.u11:;i.uHrgLuirq1tuilr??.q.|.?;1.3 the Of?cial Plan and Zoning protect, improve or restore the quality and quantity of water. Accordingly, JFEH-F.l?.?tF-‘dttHliI:?lH’qiI1E.i:r1I2HEi1l}IJT!IIE?’. .’.-:I-I-:q~1i::a]|I.’lI-rlirrli-:-I-|;F.u-In-:IaT.u.-::’nu By-law the for of South Township provide guidance with Frontenac HyhihlrTI:wui.buTiu£hEI.nh1.jw-ihpu&.r??:Iqu?hhwh’-?.|=:?.huH respect to how development should occur in consideration of protecting, improving and restoring water quality within the municipality. u:::h.ani&:£=cfp?n:E:;::p1:.=‘m£ruh’h;ndnqu5hrHm?:::nn;-Eh: !E:niu|5.LkEE£A1H.u:n;F:?:yIjApdIJLl?::mIpIm11:I&d::thq:ua’|d’—l Similarly, the CRCA’s Planning Policy (April 2015) contains provisions that seek to support these

objectives. :tI1:h1I-. The Of?cial Plan recognizes the need to minimize impacts to water quality by reducing phosphorous ..|.r:I-..I||.nI|u rr-|:I.u’p:..:n-I.LnLn-:1-wnJ.u.u.n::I|.:q:Iur:riuuI.r.nlJI_r |:;r|-:I|..I.|I.I|.I.|.|.I|.|I.III|:I|:|I.IrI.|I.lI inputs, preventing erosion and maintaining natural appearances. Accordingly, policies have been in:-.?.nrr:?L?m:iLu:H:id.51:un?£I:p=Iu:u..hum’E:[|5.n.Iiiuhnbm’. i.uJdd’id-=uuu3’E:I.:&:Ehmlh:h?’n’:h’m:?.E’m.lDbi?u:huh&.qa.?l=n included that can vary the setback from the highwater mark from 30 to 90 metres depending on the site characteristics such as steepness of slope, vegetation cover, soil depth and soil phosphorus retention. :huu:Ii?‘an:hntm:I.mnT£qn.’.I1tu.m:‘rm.uJdq:|1ud—|pi:l|huur&u_ Policy 6.1.6 of the CRCA’s Planning Policy suggests that development setbacks should be based on the F’i|I|’-=[|‘l|?ff?ll75r#1HH!|l{Pt"Fj-{fIHfh?I*H%HFT¢?tF|1b’hI1£lH’Ht#?m|h¢ ?ndings of lake management plans and site evaluation guidelines if available. For Precambrian shield ?H’l?dT|?tE£l.?H?1]hH-?5H????H?i.I1E?HtiFh?Hi¢.F??1-H??iuindl lakes such as this one, Appendix G of the Planning Policy is used to establish an appropriate setback for h:I|2iI|.’:I.I’.:I:|:I|:I1.I|:I::|.|:II:Ih:i:EI |i?H.li—‘H.II.1..’|.|:$d.I.‘3I.|!‘hEhhP’.I”.iI.’[|’.-I’.£i future |‘I.1.:I’|.‘IhI.’:I-uI|::Im’_ development. A.pIp:::hI.lJn–durIduq::dn-n2’.h’:hnnI’inE::E1u!‘Ir:pu1::hH-ml Appendix G was developed in consideration of the ?ndings of a report entitled ‘?.j.ltnFE.md?JHmEu?¢1LI.n.tin-‘ErH’tn’EmtlJu.‘da|=n:mE:h’n%u? of Municipal Site Evaluation Guidelines for Waterfront Development in Eastern Ontario’s “Assessment Lake lanai Ltd. These guidelines lml (April, Country” completed by Hutchinson Enviromnental Sciences 2014). TI1-.|.|;:lluI.hI’|.I |..tl[2:I.::I1"nm.|:I-lILb_.Il|n:l’:I’I:I’.rLn’|1:::I.=? |!.|;I.’|I..’..‘I2|Z-II:u. de?ne horizontal setback distance based such site characteristics a as soil texture and depth, water upon Hfbu1H?n1uJiuIld1h’k?nulran1Lpmdu?lIal$pL]nr1u?I|uuTpIfd?q¢?_

Page 21 of 97

Page 2 of 3

" Ms. ‘TI Jennie Kapusta IPTI (S-38-18-S) ‘1 2018 June 6, ‘J’ 1”

slope and vegetation along the shoreline. Staff have concluded that the additional land that is to be I?lzlj added to the bene?tting properties will assist with increased setback for future —’-—-I’I—I-‘I-1 II—F— an -I1—1I-Il?? 21 n’I allowing development to occur. Additionally, based upon a review of relevant mapping, both of the bene?tting properties appear to contain existing development on them already. I?IL1I?-I—I—II—I-I-Ixl-I—-Ixl Staff have no concerns with the proposal from a water quality perspective.

Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site Lb.-.1.-l.iI1h.d_‘I.I_IId|.j.— |.l.rI. I.|.|| .|:l.-| -.| Similarly, staff RWDRT d? to .— strive enhance the cultural, natural I-II .I-. preserve and I. and scenic values of the :— national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy |.|.n rr—I-I-—-I-I r-I-I.–1—— .-—- into the Zr I-Fl’I- this legacy I. future. This can be achieved through the maintenance of a natural shoreline, the maintenance and enhancement of the property, development which complements the visual character of the landscape, ‘_I vegetation on I—I’—‘I-I’-IZfIE-I?I£lEn’—L-I?-IJ-II-1I1’and the maintenance of a minimum 30 metre setback of all development from the water.

III in have no objection —m: I-‘IIIIIIZI I III I staff RWDRT to the approval of application S-3 8-18-S based on ourI consideration for natural hazards, natural and cultural heritage, and water quality and quantity protection. ‘-’–—’-Canada Rideau ‘1-— Parks Canal Of?ce oversees all in-water and shoreline works -I-—I-II’—I-I rl-rl-— I-I.—- along the Canal —I-1.system. If the landowner wishes to carry out any in-water or shoreline works in the future, the Rideau Canal Of?ce must be contacted and approval obtained prior commencement of “-‘I1I’I’:T— construction. I——:I’ITa f—’- to the II-I—-I -IIJI-I—I fl written

The “Ff:-‘I£I?-I?JII‘uI1I—I—II—Ij-IJ—-I: CRCA, under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interferencewith Wetlands, and 1 _I A—— H Alterations and Watercourses, regulates ?ood to Shorelines development within 15 of metres aI“ plain u orI IImI j-‘E erosion hazard, and within 15'1I—-IE -II1II—L-II-—— ‘L applicant metres of the top of The -I valley. -LL1 1’. future or — of owners the lands 1-I:‘1 require CRCA may a permit prior to development taking place the subject lands. on -J’I?-I—’—? If development is 1I—I1I’ III‘-I I’I’TI’ ‘fI’I’I:’ proposed on either of the bene?tting properties, the proponent should contact the undersigned for more information regarding III;-I-‘I-—IuI-‘I permitting requirements under Ontario Regulation 148/06. I1“ ‘I-fT—IJII— _“1“‘ Please notify this of?ce of any decision made by the Committee JIHHIIE I‘ u‘ regard with to this application. IIf you 1 -’—I-I—1-I1I— 1 have any questions, please contact Andrew Schmidt at (613) 546-4228 extension _I 244 or 1’—I’ —J at I"Iby email I aschmidt@crca.ca.

Andrew Schmidt, C.Tech. Supervisor, Development Review c.c. ul

-IJ?n’J—-I-—LIJ&uuI—i‘IV-—

Bryan Stoness, 4400 Carrying Place Road, Seeley’s Bay, ON, KOH Lindsay Mills, Planner, Township of South Frontenac (Via email) Susan Millar, Parks Canada (via email)

Page 22 of 97

Page 3 of 3

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-40-18-L Sally VanLuven (Mike Howe) Concession 7, Pt. Part Lot 5,Rutledge Road (Sally Lane), District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works and Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-40-18-S shall be for the creation of a 2 +/acre lot addition only to 1034 Sally Lane (PIN 362790642).
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. Page 23 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Prior to the stamping of the deeds for the parcel to be created through Consent Application S40-18-L, the applicant shall rezone the lot addition parcel from Rural to Limited Service Residential Waterfront. Please see the Township planner to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of VanLuven property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 24 of 97

D FRE

L AN E

SHEILA LANE

1048 Sally Lane

VANLUVEN (HOWE) S-40-18-L

1034 Sally Lane

Legend Howe Property

Sydenham Lake

VanLuven (Howe) Proposed Lot Addition

SA LLY LA N

Lot To Be Enlarged

VanLuven Property

L AN

w ro

IDGE

SPAR R

OW R

1 10

ar Sp

e dg i R

1041 Sparrow Ridge Lane

Page 25 of 97

Scale 1:2,000 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

80 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-41-18-P Theresa McPherson Concession 11, Pt. Part Lot 19, First Lake Road, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 11 +/- acres with frontage on First Lake Road. The land is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of minimum 2.0 acre lot with approximately 186 metres of frontage on First Lake Road. The proposed lot will be severed from the northernmost section of the existing property. One of the conditions of approval for the severance will be to rezone the Retained Parcel to a Special Rural Zone. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. KFL&A Public Health have no objections. Public Works has no objections. Comments from Quinte Conservation Authority were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-45-18-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 +/- acre lot with approximately 186 metres of frontage on First Lake Road.
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds;

Page 26 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 4. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 5. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be severed through Consent Application S-41-18-P, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-41-18-P. 8. Prior to the stamping of the deeds for the parcel to be created through Consent Application S41-18-P, the applicant shall rezone the Retained Parcel from Rural to a Special Rural Zone. Please the Township planner to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of McPherson property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 27 of 97

µ 6224 First Lake Road

FIR ST LA K

OA D

MCPHERSON S-41-18-P

Legend

6187 First Lake Road

McPherson Property McPherson Proposed Severance

Retained Parcel 6153 First Lake Road

6149 First Lake Road

Page 28 of 97

LEVEQUE ROAD

6149 First Lake Road

6113 First Lake Road

6130 First Depot Creek Lake Road

Scale 1:3,617 0

15 30

120 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

.9.

KFL&A Public Health http://www.kflaph.ca

Environmental

CONSENT To SEVER INSPECTION REPORT

Health Department

Receipt No. SK—22—2018

File Number: 5'41-13-P

Owner(s):

Theresa C. McPherson Municipality:

Ward / Former Township:

South Frontenac

Portland

Plan of Subdivision:

Part(s),

Registered Plan:

Concession 11

Lot

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water

Severed:

and sewage, etc)

-Some rocky, hilly areas, trees -Open flat field areas

Retained:

Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable.

Depth of Soil

Severed

Topsoil Sand

Percolation rate (estimated):

0.0 m 0,3 m 06 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m

table with bar. Show estimated

Retained

N/A

Percolation rate (estimated):

~15

NOTE: the approval of any new lot is based on its suitability to provide an area for a Class 4 septic tank system for an average 3 bedroom home. Approval to build a larger home on this lot will be subject to availability of sufficient area for a larger septic tank system.

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED

‘7

53"5fa°‘°”/

l“

Unsatisfactory

Site Flexible

5’“

Conditions:

Soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system. Specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. The proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system, dependent on the proposal submitted through an Application to Construct a Sewage System. —

—

5995””

RETAINED

Conditions:

l— Satisfactory l_

Unsatisfactory

l‘

Site Flexible

l’

Site Specific

Inspector:

Miranda Iezzi

CPHl(C), Public Health Inspector

Approved:

1 /l/l/lL,(<NL‘ ‘,« _

Date: June 11, 2018

PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO KFL&A PUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or l—800—267—7875.

Page 29 of 97

Thirty Island Lake

CO SE

NL VE A HE

E EV ST

O BC

N LA

LA MINER

KE LAN

MCSORLEY S-42-18-B

M cG

Legend McSorley Property

Retained Parcel AN OW N LA E

359 James Wilson Road W JAMES

Rupar Property

CK RO AD

G MC

Thirty Island Lake

McSorley Proposed Lot Addition

BCO STEVE BA

ow an

ROAD ILSON

7 29 m Ja es

Lot to be Enlarged

ils W d oa R

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

378A James Wilson Road

S ED FR AC PL

Scale 1:3,617 0

15 30

120 Meters

E LA NE

Page 30 of 97

Sand Lake

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-42-18-B Joan McSorley Concession 3, Pt. Part Lot 5, McGowan Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 32 +/- acres with frontage on James Wilson Road, Steve Babcock Road and McGowan Lane. The land is currently developed with a single dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the creation of 6.48 +/- acre lot addition to 85 McGowan Lane. This proposed lot addition parcel shall encompass a vacant parcel of land bounded on the eastern side by McGowan Lane. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works or Quinte Conservation Authority.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-42-18-B shall be for the creation of a 6.48 +/acre lot addition only to 85 McGowan Lane (PIN 362520419).
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].

ATTACHMENTS Map of McSorley property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta Page 31 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-43-18-P Orville and Lori Hamilton Concession 6, Pt. Part Lot 4, Jamieson Road, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 102 +/- acres with frontage on Jamieson Road and Alton Road. The land is currently developed with a single dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the creation of 21 +/- acre parcel with approximately 145 metres of frontage on Jamieson Road. This proposed lot will completely eliminate access to Jamieson Road from the retained parcel. The retained parcel will be 81 +/- acres in size and encompass all existing structures. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from Quinte Conservation Authority. KFL&A Public Health have no objections. Public Works has no objections.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-43-18-P shall be for the creation of a 21 +/acre parcel with approximately 145 metres of frontage on Jamieson Road.
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; Page 32 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 4. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 5. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be severed through Consent Application S-43-18-P, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-43-18-P.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Hamilton property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 33 of 97

µ 38 2

ies on

Ro ad

0 38

J 16

o ies

d oa R n

o ies m a

d oa R n

JAMIESON RO

8 37

o ies m a

d oa R n

HAMILTON S-43-18-P

Legend

3848 Jamieson Road

Hamilton Property Hamilton Proposed Severance

Retained Parcel

Page 34 of 97

3861 Alton Road West

Scale 1:4,341 0

120

160 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-44-18-S Jason and Michelle Thompson Concession 11, Pt. Part Lot 35, Stafford Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 68 +/- acres with frontage on Stafford Lane and Little Cranberry Lake. The land is currently developed with a single dwelling. The proposal is for the creation of 50 +/- acre lot addition only to 26A Beacon Point Lane. The retained parcel will be 3.75 +/- acres in size and encompass the existing structure and retain the entire water frontage. While the shape of the lot to be created through this lot addition is irregular it is similar to the existing shape of the subject lands and does not make the situation any worse. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW)) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health have or Public Works.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-44-18-S shall be for the creation of a 50 +/acre lot addition only to 26A Beacon Point Lane (PIN 362870230).
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].

ATTACHMENTS Map of Thompson property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta Page 35 of 97

µ THOMPSON S-44-18-S

Legend Menard Property Thompson Property

Lot Addition Parcel

PO IN T ON

BE AC

Lot to be Enlarged

26B Beacon Point Lane

527 Stafford Lane

AN DL ST AF FO R

Page 36 of 97

Little Cranberry Lake

Retained Parcel

LA N

Thompson Proposed Lot Addition

Little Cranberry Lake

Scale 1:4,634 0

Little Cranberry Lake Little Cranberry Lake

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

120

160 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-45-18-S Eunice Sleeth Concession 9, Pt. Part Lot 1, Lower Round Lake Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 24 +/- acres with frontage on Lower Round Lake Road and Round Lake. The land is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of minimum 2.0 acre lot with a minimum of 76 metres of frontage on Lower Round Lake Road. Sections of Round Lake and the property to the west of this subject lands are designated as Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW), with a small section of the subject land within the 120 metre buffer zone from a PSW. The proposed lot however is entirely outside this are of influence. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW)) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-45-18-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 +/- acre lot with a minimum of 76 metres of frontage on Lower Round Lake Road.
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds;

Page 37 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 4. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 5. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be severed through Consent Application S-45-18-S, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-45-18-S.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Sleeth property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 38 of 97

4532 Lower Round Lake Road 4528 Lower Round Lake Road 4512 Lower Round Lake Road

Retained Parcel LOWER ROUND LA

SLEETH S45-18-S

Legend

KE ROAD

Sleeth Property Sleeth Proposed Severance

Proposed New Lot

4459 Lower Round Lake Road

Round Lake

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

4388 Lower Round Lake Road

Page 39 of 97

AK ROUND L

E RO AD

Scale 1:4,341 0

120

160 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Page 40 of 97

Page 41 of 97

.9.

KFL&A Public Health http://www.kf|aph.ca

Environmental Health Department

INSPEC-“ON REPORT

File Number:

Receipt No si<.2o-2018

5-4548-5

Owner(s):

Sleeth, Eunice ward / Former Township: Storrington

Municipality:

South Frontenac Lot

Registered Plan:

Concession 9

Part(s),

Plan of Subdivision:

Sublot:

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and sewage, etc) -Open ?eld, wooded/treed perimeter

Severed:

-Flat -No wells or structures

Retained:

table with bar. Show estimated

Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable.

Depth of Soil

Severed

Retained

0.0 m Topsoil

0_3 m

N/A

Rock/Shale 0.6 in 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m Percolation rate (estimated): >50

Percolation rate (estimated):

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Conditions:

site development. _

The proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system, dependent on the proposal submitted through an Application to Construct a Sewage System. -Ensure a minimum of 10 inches of native soil is maintained over rock v

‘

5’“

site specific

F’e”‘b’e

RETAINED

Conditions:

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible Site Specific

Inspector:

Miranda Iezzi

CPHl(C), Public Health inspector

Approved:

/'\W K

‘,k‘ 5

Date: June 1, 2018

PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO KFL&A PUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 42 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-46-18-P Wayne Young Concession 2, Pt. Part Lot 4, Quinn Road East, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 53 +/- acres with frontage on Quinn Road East and Millhaven Creek Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW). The land is currently developed with a dwelling and detached accessory and agricultural buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a 4 +/- acre lot with a minimum of 76 metres of frontage on Quinn Road East. There is sufficient area on the proposed lot to accommodate development outside the 120 metre area of influence from a PSW. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. KFL&A Public Health have no objections. Public Works has no objections. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections but has recommended that the municipality ensures any future development on the proposed lot is located greater than 120 metres from the edge of the PSW through site plan control.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-46-18-P shall be for the creation of a 4 +/acre lot with a minimum of 76 metres of frontage on Quinn Road East.
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; Page 43 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 4. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 5. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be severed through Consent Application S-46-18-P, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-46-18-P.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Young property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 44 of 97

µ 3609 Quinn Road East 3597 Quinn Road East A QUINN RO

3596 Quinn Road East

YOUNG S-46-18-P

Proposed New Lot D EAST

Legend Young Property

3582 Quinn Road East

Young Proposed Severance

3536 Quinn Road East

Retained Parcel

Millhaven Creek

Page 45 of 97

Scale 1:5,787 0

100

150

200 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Page 46 of 97

Page 47 of 97

Page 48 of 97

Page 49 of 97

Page 50 of 97

.0.

KFL&A Public Health http://www.kf|aph.ca

Environmental

Health Department

REPORT

|NspECT|oN

File Number:

Receipt NO SK—24—2018

5'45'13’P

0wner(s): Young, W Municipality:

ward / Former Township:

South Frontenac

Portland Registered Plan:

Concession 2

Lot Pt Lot 4

Part(s),

General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water

Severed:

»Forested

Plan of Subdivision:

and sewage, etc)

area

—Notflat

Retained:

Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. lndicate water permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable.

Depth of Soil

Severed

table with bar. Show estimated

Retained

0.0 m 03 m 0'6 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m

Topsoil

Rock/Shale

Percolation rate (estimated):

Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:

SEVERED

Conditions:

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

—Soilconditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system. Specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. Due to limitations the lot will only provide a specific location for the construction ofthe sewage disposal system. The most suitable location for the sewage system is the sloped area near fence line which has a minimum of 10 inches of soil over rock —

Site Flexible Site Specific

RETAINED

Conditions:

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible Site Specific

Miranda lezzi CPH|(C), Public Health Inspector

Inspector:

Date: June 5 2018

Approved: '

‘

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267—787S.

Page 51 of 97

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENACAPPLICATIONFOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Date Received: 1.

{(2218 Magi

1%” }8’l

File No:

w,wc>f 3/C/A

Name of Owner(s):

Full Mailing Address of Owner(s):

5’53d;

54 s 7

99¢

a/my

/{/0 /K.

27,277 Phone number of Owner(s): 47" <5/J”‘37.?—

5/)3“

§(X?".?.iJ’é

Email Address of Owner(s): If the appiint is NOT the owner of the subject land, the written authorizationof the owner that -= -1- tr the applicant is authorized to make the application, mu . ~

Name of Authorized Agent: Full Mailing Address of Authorized Agent:

Phone number of Authorized Agent: Email Address of Authorized Agent: Agent as named above is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the owners processing this application for Minor Variance.

Lots

foysurposes of

Fees

Signature(s) of 0wner(s)

The description of the subject land: District:

E?gortland

*1Bedford

Concession Number: Street Number:

g ‘gg

Zfié

Lot Number:

Name of Roadlstreetz

Reference Plan Number: Roi|Number:

o?0-0/0-06600

L3Storrington

L1Loughborough

£2

40 2

(Q1;12/

Part Number(s): ~0c9£>c9

Page 52 of 97

TOWNSHIPOF SOUTH FRONTENACAPPLICATION FOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended The frontage(s), depth and area of the subject land.

Frontage (on water):

Frontage (on road/lane):

Depth:

Area:

The type and the purpose of theproposed transaction, such as a transfer for the creation of a new lot. a lot addition, an easement/right-of-way, a charge, a lease or a correction of title.

/“5/?

/05:4;

/07’”

do;/?y;

information regarding the land intended to be severed and the land to be retained: The following NOTE: If your application is for a new lot.answer question 6(a); if the application is for a lot addition or right-of-way only, answer question 6(b).

a. The frontage, depth and the area. (Complete this section for a new lot only) Proposed New Lot:

Retained Lot:

Frontage On Road

A?-50F

Frontage On Water

X /‘VI .

Frontage On Water

Depth

Q 2 /14

Depth

Area

2 gig

Area

Please listldescribe the existing and proposed USES of the land to be severed and to be retained: Existing Uses

Proposed Uses

New Lot:

—4CcL—~/we,

/(,e¢,ZAo‘b–e/4

Retained:

f:’°’v‘-’v’*-” Structures Existing

New LOT:

&Qg4_JL

Structures Proposed )’.x_¢_¢)

2‘

Page 53 of 97

TOWNSHIPOF SOUTH FRONTENACAPPLICATIONFOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.s.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended Structures Proposed

Structures Existing

Retained Lot:

.424’? (b) The frontage, depth and the area. (Complete for a lot addition or right-of-way (R.O.W.) only) Proposed Lot Addition (or right-of-way)

Retained Lot: (This is the propertyfmm which the lot addition is being severed or over which the R.O.W. willrun)

Frontage

On Road:

Frontage On Water:

Depth:

Area:

Please Iistldescribe the existing and proposed USES of the land to be severed and to be retained: Present Use of Property

Proposed Use of Property

Structures Existing

Structures Proposed

Lot Additionor R.0.W:

Retained:

LotAddition (or R.O.W.):

Retained Lot:

Please list the name of the person(s) to whom the land or an interest in the land is to be transferred.charged or leased (If known):

Se]-P

Page 54 of 97

TOWNSHIPOF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATION FOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended

Indicate whether there are any easements or restrictive covenants affecting the subject land and a description of each easement or covenant and its effect (if known): ,….o-………-

9.Name of road or lane which accesses: The new lot (lot addition or R.O.W.):

0a//M

The retained lot:

NOTE: Some roads (particularly former “Countj? Roads) have speci?c requirements for spacing between entrances. Also, any proposed new entrance must have safe sight-lines. These requirements may affect the success of your application. If you wish to check the status of your road or sight line conditions, please contact the Roads Department at 376-3027.

If access to the new lot is by water only, describe the parking and docking facilities to be used and the approximate distance of these facilities from the subject land and the nearest public road. New Lot:

Retained Lot: 10. Note the method by which water willbe provided, i.e., by a publicly owned and operated piped water system. privately owned and operated individual or communal well, a lake or other water body or other means.

New Lot: gm qfe

“)2;/1

Retained Lot:

Note the method by which sewage disposal willbe provided, e.g. private septic, privy or other means:

/ua/e

New Lot:

(is.

Retained Lot:

The current zoning of the subject land in the applicable Zoning By-law. _%g¢.:l

/‘-G/

If known, has the subject land ever been the subject of a previous consent (severance) application OR an application for a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act? If so, please indicate: (a) The ?le #:

(b) The decision on the application:

Page 55 of 97

TOWNSHIPOF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATIONFOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended (c) The cunent use of the lot created (ifapplicable):

14.lf known. has the subject land ever been the subject of any other application under the Planning Act, such as n application for an amendment to an oflicialplan, a zoning by-law, a ministers zoning order.a minor variance? If so, please indicate:

(b) The ?le #:

(b) The decision on the application:

15.Are there any abandoned wells on the property you aware of?

Fl Yes

A SKETCH must be submitted showing the following:

a) The boundaries and dimensions of the subject land, the part that is to be severed and the part that is to be retained. b) The location of all land previously severed from the parcel (if applicable) originallyacquired by the current owner of the subject land. C) The approximate location of all natural and arti?cialfeatures on the subject land and on the abutting lands. Examples include buildings. railways. roads. watercourses. drainage ditches. river or stream banks, barns, wetlands, wooded areas, wells and septic tanks. Show distance of these features from the applicants property lines. d) The current uses of land that is abutting the subject land, such as residential, agricultural and commercial uses (if agricultural. please indicate the approximate distance of any barn structure from the proposed new lot). Note: The existence of a nearby barn or other farm type structure may affect the success of your application because of Incompatibility Issues. Please check with the Planning Department regarding the implications of any farm structure. on your application. 6) The location, width and name of any roads withinor abutting the subject land, indicating whether it is an unopened road allowance, a public travelled road, a private road or a right of

way. f) If access to the subject land is by water only, the location of the parking and boat docking facilities to be used. 9) The location and nature of any easement affecting the subject land. h) The location of any abandoned wells on the property. i) Please prepare your sketch so that North is at the top of the page.

Page 56 of 97

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC APPLICATIONFOR CONSENT Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 as amended AGREEMENT TO INDEMNIFY Attched to this application is a cheque payable to the Township of South Frontenac in the amount of $817.00 representing payment of the application fee.

The OwnerlApplicantlAgent agrees that the information recorded in this Consent Application Form is accurate. The Owner/Applicant!/tgent agrees that representatives of the Township, Public Health and. where applicable, the appropriate Conservation Authority, may enter onto the subject property for the purpose of detennining the appropriateness of the site for the proposed development.

The Owner/Applicantagrees to reimburse and indemnify the municipality for all fees and expenses incurred by the municipality to process the application, including any fees and expenses attributable to proceedings before the Ontario Municipal Board or any court or other administrative tribunal if necessary to defend the Committee’s decision to support the application. Without limitingthe foregoing, such fees and expenses shall include the fees and expenses of consultants, planners, engineers, lawyers and such other professional and technil advisers as the municipality may, in its absolute discretion acting reasonably, consider necessary or advisable to more properly process and support the application, The Owner/Applicant further agrees to provide the municipality, upon request and in cases where an application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, with a deposit (over and above the nonnal application fee). from which the municipality may, from time to time charge any fees and expenses incurred by the municipality in order to process the application. If such appeal expenses exceed the deposit, the OwnerlApplicant shall pay the difference forthwith upon being billed by the municipality, with interest at the rat of 1.25% per month (15% per annum) on accounts overdue more than 30 days, The OwnerlApplicant further agrees that, until such requests have been complied with, the municipality will have no continuing obliatlonto process the application or attend or be represented at the Ontario Municipal Board or any court or other administrative proceeding in connection with the application:

DATEDAT THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

THIS I

“’

DAYOF N

g?a?

,2o

/2 /3:»–..6..>~

declaration conscientiously believing to be true and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if made under oath and by virtue of the Canada Evidence Act.

Page 57 of 97

Page 58 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-47-18-P Everett Kerr Concession 5, Pt. Part Lot 6, Road 38, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 55 +/- acres with frontage on Road 38. The land is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of a 1.9 +/- acre lot addition to a commercial property created through Consent Application S-55-17-P. There was insufficient space on the lot created to encompass both the proposed commercial development and the required septic system. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Settlement Area Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works or Quinte Conservation Authority.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-47-18-P shall be for the creation of a 1.9 +/+/- acre lot addition to the parcel created through Consent Application S-55-17-P.
The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. Page 59 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. 4. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 5. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. Prior to the stamping of the deeds the applicant shall rezone the parcel to be created through Consent Application S-47-18-P from Rural (RU) to Urban Commercial (UC). Please see the Township planner to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Kerr property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 60 of 97

µ KERR S-47-18-P

Proposed Lot Addition Parcel

GRAHAM ROAD

Legend Kerr Property Commercial Lot (S-55-17-P) Kerr Proposed Lot Addition

PARK STREET

Retained Parcel 5119 Road 38 ROAD 38

RK CENTENNIAL PA

ROAD

5086 Road 38 NOT

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

RE D

AM E EET STR

Page 61 of 97

5074 Road 38

Scale 1:2,894 0 12.5 25

5062 Road 38

100 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-48-18-L Helen and Spencer Storms Concession 5, Pt. Part Lot 6, Storm Haven Lane (Slumber Lane), District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 35 +/- acres with frontage on Rutledge Road, Storm Haven Lane and Slumber Lane. The land is currently developed with a single dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a 8.75 +/- acre lot addition to a 1040 Slumber Lane. The retained parcel will encompass all existing structures. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works or Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-48-18-L shall be for the creation of an 8.75 +/- acre lot addition only to 1040 Slumber Lane (PIN 362790704).
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
Prior to the stamping of the deeds the applicant shall rezone the parcel to be created through Consent Application S-48-18-L from Rural (RU) to Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW). Please see the Township planner to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Storms property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta Page 62 of 97

1124 Slumber Lane

SALLY LANE

1040 Slumber Lane

Sydenham Lake

STORMS S-48-18-L

Legend E SA LLY LAN

E AN

EL IDG WR

RETREAT LANE

2599 Rutledge Road

SYDENHAM ROAD

LANE

COVE LA

Page 63 of 97

VILLAGE VIEW

Storms Proposed Lot Addition

Retained Parcel

RUTLEDGE ROAD

2673 Rutledge Road

Bennett Property

SHEILA LANE

S SAILOR

SHALLOW LANE

Proposed Lot Addition Parcel

SPA R

BRIDLE PATH LANE

MOZART LANE

SLUMBER LANE

Storms Property

Scale 1:5,486 0

100

150

200 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-50-18-S 548883 Ontario Limited Concession 8, Pt. Part Lot 15/16, Hiawatha Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a right-of-way Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a right-of-way be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 50 +/- acres with frontage on Hiawatha Lane, Hewett Lane and Dog Lake. The land is currently developed as a commercial resort. The proposal is to permit the property known as 4027 Hiawatha Lane to use an existing right-of-way over the commercial resort property to access Dog Lake. This right-of-way already exists for use by the resort guests in addition to several other property owners along Hiawatha Lane. This application will not create the right-of-way but add another property to the list of legally permitted users. The planning department is able to support the application. Current Zoning: Recreational Resort Commercial – Special Zone 4 (RRC-4) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments were not required from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works or Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-50-18-S shall be for the creation of a 0.4 +/acre right-of-way over 4004 Hiawatha Lane to Dog Lake.
Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.

ATTACHMENTS Map of 548883 Ontario Limited property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 64 of 97

Dog Lake

548883 ONTARIO LIMITED S-50-18-S

N LA

Legend

548883 Ontario Limited Property

4004 Hiawatha Lane

Briscoe Property

AY LANE HIDEAW

Retained Parcel

T ET W E

HIAWATHA LA

Proposed ROW

Milburn Creek

Dog Lake

4027 Hiawatha Lane Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Milburn Creek

Dog Lake

Page 65 of 97

Scale 1:2,170 0

80 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Sydenham Lake

VANLUVEN S-49-18-L (HUTCHINGS) S-52-18-L (JENNINGS) S-53-18-L (DORMAN) S-54-18-L (SIGSWORTH)

ila L ane

1071 Carslake Lane

She

1273 Sheila Lane

127 3

ila L ane She

127 3

1273

She

ila L ane

1277 Sheila Lane

AK RSL

Legend

E L AN

VanLuven Property Sigsworth Property Sigsworth Lot Addition

BO ON

Dorman Property L AN

Dorman Lot Addition

Jennings Property Jennings Lot Addition S-37-18-L APPROVED Hutchings Property Hutchings Lot Addition

1194 Sheila Lane

SHEILA LANE

Page 66 of 97

Retained Parcel

Scale 1:1,809 0 5 10

40 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: July 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-49-18-L, S-52-18-L, S-53-18-L, S-54-18-L Sally VanLuven Concession 7, Pt. Part Lot 5, Rutledge Road (Sheila Lane, Carslake Lane), District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create four lot additions Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create four lot additions be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject lands consist of 77 +/- acres with frontage on Sally Lane, Sheila Lane, Carslake Lane, Boon Lane, Fred Lane, Sparrow Ridge Lane, Rutledge Road and Sydenham Lake. The land is currently developed with a single detached dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal for S-49-18-L is to add a 1.96 +/- acre parcel, with frontage on Sheila Lane and Carslake Lane, to 1273 Sheila Lane. This lot addition would serve to increase the size of an existing undersized waterfront lot and bring it into conformity with the zoning by-law. The proposal for S-52-18-L is to add a 0.19 +/- acre parcel, with frontage on Sheila Lane, to 1247 Sheila Lane. The proposal for S-53-18-L is to add a 1.1 +/- acre parcel, with frontage on Boon Lane and Sheila Lane, to 1024 Boon Lane. This proposal will serve to increase the size of an existing undersized lot. The proposal for S-54-18-L is to add a 1.1 +/- acre parcel to 1015 Boon Lane. This proposal will serve to increase the size of an existing undersized lot. One of the conditions of the approvals for all the lot additions will be to rezone the parcels from Rural to Limited Service Residential Waterfront. The planning department is able to support the applications. Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS The building department has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health, Public Works and Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required.

CONDITIONS

An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-49-18-L shall be for the creation of a 1.96 +/acre lot addition only to 1273 Sheila Lane (PIN 362790624), together with a right-of-way over Sheila Lane and Carslake Lane.
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-52-18-L shall be for the creation of a 0.19 +/acre lot addition only to 1247 Sheila Lane (PIN 362791247), together with a right-of-way over Sheila Lane. Page 67 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-53-18-L shall be for the creation of a 1.1 +/acre lot addition only to 1024 Boon Lane (PIN 362790621), together with a right-of-way over Sheila Land and Boon Lane. 5. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-54-18-L shall be for the creation of a 1.1 +/acre lot addition only to 1015 Boon Lane (PIN 362790620), together with a right-of-way over Sheila Lane and Boon Lane. 6. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 7. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 8. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 for each of the parcels to be severed through Consent Applications S-49-18-L, S-52-18-L, S-53-18-L, and S-54-18-L, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 9. Prior to the stamping of the deeds for the lot addition parcels to be created through Consent Applications S-49-18-L, S-52-18-L, S-53-18-L, and S-54-18-L the applicant shall rezone the lot addition parcels from Rural to Limited Service Residential Waterfront. Please see the Township planner to begin this process.

ATTACHMENTS Map of VanLuven property. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 68 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: June 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-04-18-B Guy Marchildon and Nicole Smith Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 8, Island 50, Devil Lake, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary sections 5.8.2a and 11.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water for construction of a dwelling be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of an 8.8 +/- acre island in Devil Lake, known as Island 50. The property is currently vacant. The proposal is for the construction of a 24 foot by 36 foot (864 square foot footprint) two-story dwelling to be located a minimum of 20 metres from the high water mark of Devil Lake. The applicant has submitted a preliminary Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA), completed in April 2015, in support of this application. This analysis was completed to determine if there was a suitable building envelope outside the 30 metre setback and this EIA determined there was sufficient space which met the setbacks. The applicant has requested a 10 metre reduction in this setback due to the constraints of the topography of the island. The Planning Department is unable to support the application as submitted. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Island Zone (RLSI) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

Page 69 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has reviewed the EIA supplied and the proposal submitted. They have recommended deferral of the application until a scoped or full EIA has been submitted The reason were the original EIA did not address the proposed development, it indicated sufficient space outside the 30 metre setback for development and a one third reduction (10 metres) to the required setback is not considered minor. Comments were not required from Public Works or KFL&A Public Health. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a maximum 865 square foot footprint, two-story dwelling, with no basement permitted, to be located a minimum of 20 metres from the high water mark of Devil Lake. This minor variance is for construction on Island 50 only.
Minor variance MV-04-18-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Marchildon Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 70 of 97

µ MARCHILDON MV-04-18-B

Legend Marchildon Property Marchildon Proposed Cottage

Marchildon Proposed 20 metre Setback Frontenac Provincial Park

Devil Lake Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Devil Lake

Page 71 of 97

Scale 1:1,000 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

40 Meters

µ MARCHILDON MV-04-18-B

Devil Lake

Legend Marchildon Property 30 metre setback Marchildon Proposed Cottage

Marchildon Proposed 20 metre Setback Frontenac Provincial Park

Devil Lake

Page 72 of 97

Scale 1:1,614 0 5 10

40 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Page 73 of 97

Page 74 of 97

Page 75 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: June 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-10-18-L Douglas and Sylvia Shelley Concession 3, Lot/Part Lot 10, 3771 Daley Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary sections 7.3.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit a reduction in interior side yard Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit a reduction in interior side yard be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of a 0.68 +/- acre parcel with frontage on Daley Road. The property is currently developed with a single dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the construction of a 26 foot by 38 foot (988 square foot footprint) addition to the existing dwelling. Based on the survey provided by the applicant the existing dwelling is located 31.25 feet from the side property line. An addition with a width of 28 feet would reduce the side yard from 9.8 feet to 5.25 feet. The Planning Department is able to support the application as submitted. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments were not required from Public Works, KFL&A Public Health or Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. The building department has no objections. Page 76 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of an addition to an existing dwelling at 3771 Daley Road, to be located a minimum of 5.25 feet from the interior side property line.
Minor variance MV-10-18-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Shelley Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 77 of 97

µ 3774 DALEY ROAD

3773 DALEY ROAD

SHELLEY MV-10-18-L

Legend Shelley Property Shelley Proposed Addition

3770 DALEY ROAD

3771 DALEY ROAD

Page 78 of 97

3761 DALEY ROAD

DALEY ROAD

Shelley Proposed Garage Addition

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

3762 DALEY ROAD

Scale 1:434 0

16 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: June 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-11-18-S Tim Greenlees Concession 1, Lot/Part Lot 52, 1015 Sandpiper Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit an increase in footprint and an increase in living space to an existing dwelling within the 30 metre setback from water Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit a reduction in interior side yard be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of a 1.82 +/- acre parcel with frontage on Sandpiper Lane and Loughborough Lake. The property is currently developed with a single dwelling and detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the partial demolition of the existing dwelling, then the reconstruction and enlargement of this dwelling. The enlargement proposed includes an increase in building footprint, the addition of a full basement under the current sunroom area (east end of dwelling) and cabin portion (west end of dwelling) which would tie into and be accessible from the existing basement area under the central portion of the dwelling and an increase in height as part of the reconstruction of the roof to unify the rooflines. There would be an overall increase in gross floor area of approximately 410 square feet; and increase in footprint of approximately 670 square feet and a height increase of approximately 8 feet. All of these increases would be on the sides and back (nonwater side) of the existing dwelling and there would be no farther encroachment into the 30 metre setback than the existing dwelling. The Planning Department is able to support the application as submitted. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes Page 79 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments were not required from Public Works or KFL&A Public Health. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority have yet to be received. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the reconstruction and enlargement of an existing dwelling within the 30 metre setback from water, located at 1015 Sandpiper Lane. This minor variance permits a maximum 675 square foot footprint increase, a maximum 8 foot height increase and a maximum 700 square foot increase in gross floor area over the existing dwelling. The increases are to be located on the sides and rear of the dwelling and shall not encroach any farther into the 30 metre setback.
Minor variance MV-10-18-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Greenlees Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 80 of 97

N SA

ER IP P D

N LA

Loughborough Lake

GREENLEES MV-11-18-S

Legend Greenlees Proposed Rebuild

1015 Sandpiper Lane

Greenlees Property

LARK LANE

Page 81 of 97

DA CE

DG RI

NE LA

Scale 1:800 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

32 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: June 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-12-18-B William and Kimberly Powis Concession 2, Lot/Part Lot 20/21, 2632 Green Bay Road, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary sections 5.24.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of an accessory building in the front yard Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit a reduction in interior side yard be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of a 2.31 +/- acre parcel with frontage on Green Bay Road and Bobs Lake Road. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the construction of a 20 foot by 25 foot (500 square foot footprint) accessory building in the front yard of 2632 Green Bay Road. This building would be located approximately105 feet from Green Bay Road. The topography of the property and location of the existing dwelling and septic system make it impossible to locate the accessory structure outside either the front yard or exterior side yard. The Planning Department is able to support the application as submitted. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments were not required from Public Works or KFL&A Public Health or Rideau Valley Conservation Authority. The building department has no objections. Page 82 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a 500 square foot footprint accessory building in the front yard of 2632 Green Bay Road.
Minor variance MV-12-18-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Powis Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 83 of 97

µ BOB

POWIS MV-12-18-B

S LA KE

Legend

ROA D

Powis Property

2632 Green Bay Road

2624 Green Bay Road

Powis Proposed Garage

1603 Buck Bay Road

BUCK BAY ROAD

GREEN BAY RO

Page 84 of 97

Scale 1:868 0

4.25 8.5

25.5

UTM Projection NAD 83

34 Meters

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: June 12, 2018 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-13-18-L Gordon Burns Concession 6, Lot/Part Lot 25, Sand Island, Loughborough Lake, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary sections 5.8.2 and 11.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of a dwelling within the 30 metre setback from water Date of Hearing: June 14, 2018

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit a reduction in the 30 metre setback from water be considered for passage.

BACKGROUND The subject land consists of a 1.57 +/- acre island, known as Sand Island, with frontage on Loughborough Lake. The property is currently vacant. The applicant has previously been granted a minor variance on this property for a 1200 square foot, single storey dwelling with no basement to be located a minimum of 55 feet from the high water mark of Loughborough Lake. Upon surveying the island it was discovered that it would be challenging if not impossible to fit what was approved into the setback approved. As such, the proposal for this minor variance application is for a 1200 square foot, gross floor area, two storey dwelling with a minimum setback from Loughborough Lake of 50 feet rather than 55 feet. This will reduce the footprint of the structure but not increase the impact on the lake as the useable living space will remain unchanged. The Planning Department is able to support the application as submitted. FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:

Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes

AGENCY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Page 85 of 97

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comments were not required from Public Works or KFL&A Public Health. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and KFL&A Public Health both indicated that as the overall useable living space remained the same as the original proposal that their previous comments of no objections to the proposal remained in effect. The building department has no objections.

CONDITIONS

This minor variance is for the construction of a 1200 square foot, gross floor area, two stories, no basement permitted dwelling to be located a minimum of 15 metres from the high water mark of Loughborough Lake. This minor variance only applies to Sand Island.
Minor variance MV-13-18-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.

ATTACHMENTS Map of Burns Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta

Page 86 of 97

Loughborough Lake

BURNS MV-13-18-L

Legend Burns Property Burns Proposed Building Burns Proposed 15 metre Setback

Loughborough Lake

Page 87 of 97

Scale 1:994 0

UTM Projection NAD 83

40 Meters

= f ?=-.

Ecological Services -l

] f7

lhd ‘,7

3803 Syaenham Rd. Elginburg, Ontario KOH ?MO

Phone: (613) 376-6916; Fax: (613) 544-0072 E-mail: ecoserv@kos.net

December 22, 2004 Mr. Gord Bums 1104 Koen Lane R.R. #2

Perth Road, Ontario KOH 2L0 Dear Mr Burns:

RE: PROPOSED MINOR VARIANCE PART LOT 25, CONCESSION VI

SAND ISLAND, LOUGm30ROUGH LAKE GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSH[P OF LOUGm30ROUGH TOWNSH[P OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Further to my site inspection of your island property of October 31s’, I have reviewed the background material for your proposed minor variance. I note that the review comments, both internal and external, raised no objection to the minor varxance. The Ietters of objection received from the public focus on percpived missed opportunities (which I wil not address) and environmental concerns. In general, I agree with the comments of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA), made in their correspondence of October 20, 2004, and their undated Enviromnental Site Evaluation record.

You propose to build a cottage on Sand Island, and have applied to reduce the setback of the bui?ding from the igh water from that required in the Zoning By-law due to the limitations iofmposed the isbeen land’screated size andatshape. is a lobutt ofhave record.never?Lotsbeenof idevel ecorr3?oped.areInparcel land thatby have some tiThe me iinslathendpast, Souths Froritemc Township, lots of record are considered to be those separate parcels of land that as separate or toIslSeptember vided imslaatelndsy 1.5 are acres, considered lexiotssoftedrecord. In the enti casetieofs priSand and, the areas, 2000. of landUndi is approxi naturaltolybe created by relative land and water elevations.

Lots of record are often undersized, as land division standards are developed and as they change over the years. The key issue is whether or not the impacts of development, perhaps with

miislatinds gatioasn, undersi are acceptabl CRCAand concurs s approach, remarkipossi ng thatble,they zed lotse.ofTherecord,? ?consiwidtherthidevel opment where w’th"approach mitigation

Page 88 of 97

measures.

The island 18 treed, with a rmxture of wite pme, sug:ar maple and white cedar It would be dassed as a White Pine - Sugar Maple ?Mixed Forest community, after Lee et al. ,1 who have land classiofn.icatiTheon proposed system forsisouthern Ontario.isThesomewhat tree covermoreis mature, widevel th evioped dencean ofecolhealogitchyal regenerati te of the cottage open, a benefit of which will be that fewer trees will need to be cleared.

On sitattetoa coupl e of common speciesesduriwereng the observed, s probabl e that thes was islandobserved, provides habi a number of songbibirdrdspeci year. Noarievid itdience of mammal and I would expect that use of the island by mammals would be opportunistic only, based on the island’s size and resource base. The island rises to a moderate elevation above the water, but supports no wetland habiLake tat. Fiissah warm-mter habitat is associ ated wiand th Loughborough Lake,tobutbe hitheghleast basi n of Loughborough ecosystem, is not considered y sensitivez.

The setback ft (16.8 m). You havemiinndiimcumatedstandards. a wil ingness to consi lation of septiproposed c treatment faciliistie55s that exceed curr:ent In addi tion, dI erwoulinstal d suggest that you consider the some or all of the following steps to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on Sand Island: . @ consider reasonable adjustment of the external dimensions of the proposed cottage, such that a desired area of development can be achieved while maximizing the water setback; @ undertake (through a site plan control agreement or other means satisfactory to the

muni c i p al i t y) to mai n tai n the natural vegetati o n and soi l mantl e w’ t hi n the setback area i n i t s natural state. This undertaking should not be so restrictive that you are unable to cut a tree in the event of a property protecti o n si t uati o n; the i n tent of thi s recommendati o n i s that the vegetati o n and soil mantle would remain undisturbed, thus providing a natural erosion control mechanism that wil act to protect both the terrestrial and aquatic ecology as well as the built stmcture you propose.

investigate the alternative semge treatment systems available. In selecting a system that is feasi b l e for the specffi c si t e condi t i o ns of Sand Isl a nd, consi d er the systems that resul t i n a Mgh standard of effluent discharge. I note that because this is an island, it is unlikely that this cottage wil be used for or converted to a year-round residential use; thus the sewage disposal pressures will most likely remain seasonal and intermittent.

1 Lee, H.T., W.D. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig and S.

McMurray, EcoloogiMicnalisLand assificResources, ation for Southern OntarioSci: Fiernce st Approxi and Its Applicati1998. on. Ontari try of ClNatural Southcentral Sectiomn,atiScionence Development arid Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02. 2 Ministry of the Enviromnent and ‘]Viinistry of Natural Resources. 1993. Inland lake trout management in southeastern Oritario. Queen’s Printer for Canada. 160 pp.

Page 89 of 97

* direct the mnoff from hardened surfaces such as the cottage roof to the island’s center, such that the dischgged water wil% infiltrate into the soil or pass across a vegetated buffer before it reaches Loughborough Lake. As recommended by the CRCA, this measure wil help to protect the water quality of the lake.

Subj e ct to the sati s factory i m pl e mentati o n of these recommendati o ns, i t i s my opi n i o n that your proposed development would cause no significant impact on the natural features and functions of Loughborough Lake. Wi t h respect to the Provi n ci a l PoIi c y Statement, these steps shoul d provi d e an appropriate level of protection to fish habitat from the nature and intensity of the proposed development. As such, I believe your proposed development would be in conformity with the PPS.

I tmst this is to your satisfaction. Please give me a cau if you have any questions regarding the above.

Respectfully submitted,

‘!==!-=

,?S’

Mary Alice Snetsinger’

Page 90 of 97

’l -’ aT:-’ - a’ X .i’l’:’s.?:-’-?’ ..+ :-Ql? -’ ?’ l-.x ?l-K

HealtbJl D ?’ Ti :( ’ A An. aca?edited teat:hiii,q hettlth. uir.it aJ]iliotcti witit Qriccn.’s Uni iicrsif,r) I.M. Gemmill MD, CCFP, FRCP(C) Medical Officer of Health

‘?!VED act’ ,,,) 2UU'4

‘mffisH!,p OF

October 7, 2004

SOU’TH ’ FRONTENAC Lindsay Mius, Planner Municipauty of South Frontenac p.o. Box 100, Sydenham, ON KOH 2T0 Dear Mr. Mills:

Re: Application for Minor Variance No. MV-023-04-L Lot 25 Concession VI Municipality of South Frontenac, District of Loughborough

The Health Unit has reviewed this proposal and has visited the island

subject to the appucation. It has been concluded that the applicant has sufficient area for a class 1, class 2 or class 4 tertiary treatment sewage system. Approval for a system and detail on it’s exact location wffl be,

determined when the applicant proceeds with constuction of the structure.

In conclusion, the Health Unit has no objection to the approyal of the variance.

If you have any questions or require further darification please contact our office.

Yours truly

o2>- ds David Cooke, C.P.H.I.(C), Public Health Inspector Coordinator Sewage Systems Program /pd

KINGSTON, FRONTENAC AND LENNOX & ADDINGTON HEALTH UNIT Main Offlce

221 Portsmo?itli Avenue, Kiiigston, Ontario K7M 1V5

Tel: (013) 549-1232 1-800-26777875 Faxi -(6Lj) 549-7896 wrww.healthunit.on.ca

Branch Offices

Cloyiie

Tel: (613) 336-8989 Fax:(613) 336-0522

Sli.;rbot Lake Tel: (613) (i 279-2151 Fax: (613) 279-3997 (i Napanee Tel: (613) 354-3357 Fax: (613) 354-6267

Page 91 of 97

18/20/2elel4 11:17 6135476474

CATARAGlu? REGI€N C.A

PAGE Bl

CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORJTV 1641 Perth Road, J.O. Bo,; 1 6o Glenburnie, Ontario KOH 1 50 ’ Phorie: (61?) 546-4228 Fax (61 3) 547-64j4 Ernail: crca@cataraquiregion,on,ca

Web Site: www.cataraquF?egion.on.ca File: MV-FRS

October.20, 2004 YJA FAX

Ms. Anne LeVac, Planning Assistmit Township of South Frontenac P.0, Box 100

Sydenham, ON KOH 2T0 (623) 376-3027

(r? 8w*s #/

Dear Ms. LeVac: nii

APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE (MV-023-04-S); BURNS SAND (WAL’KERS) ISLAND

LOT 25; CONCESSION VI’; LOUGHBOROUGH: DISTRICT LOUGm30ROUGH LAKE (EAST BASIN)

Staff of the Cataraqui Region Consei-vatioxz Authority (CRCA) have reviewed the above-noted Applioation, have inspected the site, and would like to offer the following comments. Approval

of the proposed variance wouJd permit the construction of a dwelling w’tbin the 30 metre waterfront setback tlxat is required by the Zoning By-law for the former Township of I.,oughborough. The, proposed 111 square metre dwelling would be set back 13,5 metres from the highwate;c mark of Sand (Walkers) Island.

The subject island is located in the East Basin of Loughborough Lake. The propert5r is level and is well ve7etated with mature pine and oak trees. There is a natural clearing in the area of the proposed dweuing.

Staff are primarily concerned with issues surrounding natural heritage, natural hazards, and the protection of the surface water quality of Loughborough r,ake, Staff approach islands as undersized lots of record our general approach is to consider development where possible, with mitigation measuresNatural Heritage

The subject island is very well vegetated and provides valuable wildlife habitat. In order to protect the exigting Vegetation, staff encourage the applicant to only groove trees and shrubs in me area of construction. In oyder to accomplish tbis, Staff ancourage the Township to enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement with the applicant.

111182

?’? ‘; ‘%:9 j

hyeibsoriieorirvatiunOrnarloNctwork ““l”

Page 92 of 97

lel/2el/’e)04 11:17

6135476474

CATARAQu? REGmN C.A

PAGE B2

Anne Le’vae; October 20, 2004 MV-023-04-S; Page Two ‘ffla$N Hazards

The subject island is elevated above the floodplain of Loughborough Lake and the topography is level. The proposed dweuing will not be subject to any erosion hazards. Surface Water Quality

The Township’s Official Plan and draft Zoning By-law recognize the importance of surface water quality aad require that all development occur at a minimum setback of :3o metres from the

?“ighwater mark. The intent of tbe setback is to provide a buffer of undisturbed soil and

vegetation along the shoreline, which will help to filter mnoff, prevent soil erosion, and provide wirdlife habitatJ Efforts should be made to maintaixx natural vegetation aIong the shorelime. h order to help protect siace water quality, maff recommend tbat all roof runoff from the dwelling be directed mlmid from Loughborough I.,ake into areas where infiltration can occw. Recommendation

Staff have no objection to the approval of Minor Variance Application MV-023-04-L, based on our consideration for natural heritage, natural hazards, mid water quality and quantity proteion

policies. Please inform this office-of any decision made by the Committee with regard to tms Application.

If you have any questions please contact the undersigned at (613) 546-4228 extension 236, or by e-mail at marsbal1@cataraquiregion.on.ca. Yours traly,

€-‘Andrew Mar8hall Enviromnental Planner

Page 93 of 97

18/2el/2at)4 11:17 E)135476474

CATARA€)UI RECi?ON C.A

PAGE 83

Township of South Froontenac ?ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EVALUATION

The purposes of the site evaluation are: (a) to provide an initial asaesstneait of the potential

impacts of deyelopment proposale in enviromaentally sensitive areag; (b) to a8sess fhe potential impacts of natural l’iazards on the proposed development; and (c) to make mxggestions on ways to a-mi4 reduce or mitigate any impacts should the proposed development be approwd. This evaluation: is inteuded to assist the municipality in reaching decisions on plamning applications on

or near waterfront or other ri,nvirotim entally Sensitive areas, and is requested in compliance wilh . Sections s .2.7, 5.2.8, 5.2.9, and s .2.11 of the Official Plan or the Township of South Frontenac. . (To be comp[med by municipality) LOCATION O:F PROPOSAL:

District: teHbNrxxstiCd

LotNci: , 2.s’. ,. CoucessionNo; ? Roa&ane: APPI,XCA? rNpORMAT}oN= Addxess:

Owner: (3uu:t

PhoneNo: ‘3r;,-4ra"3g Address:

Owner:

Plxone No: Address’

Age,nt (if appljcable):

T’hone No:

APPLlCk’T.X€Mk,,MU-02.5-og-

-L

OF APPLICATION: DF.SrRJTPTXON F

-stsg /4xiAh)d -ro perust, p w@m,.i(; i7.Cst7s4 ?s wu4?asvm c6r ,(isuss% bb7) ?

X-

Page 94 of 97

U/?lAk’/jlL4Ul h!L(ilLIN (:.A

b:l’l!)4 /b4 /4

/2el/2664 ll:l/

PACIE 04

2 MaM

Wll

fia cmitpl?ated by (>uervmimi Auxli-o;hy - Please add pomments or recm;uzx?endalEoits W

where applfcable) UTM Coordinrites: x?, y,,, A: !>ITE,Q’ES(;‘Rn’TTON:

(i) Predommant Grouml Cover (a) witbin area of interest

F Ttees Sltrubs Bare Sou Roek

Lawn

(b) along lxigh water mar?c ff Trees

I i

Slirubs Bare Sou Rock

Lawn Comrnents:

<ptJ (,Q 7

? /ik ??

?vA-% ?z? ‘?j? ?i w??

(ii) Soiltypeamldepthwitbjn30mofhighwntermark,orwithinEnvironmentauy’ Seusitive Area as desigixated in Official Plan

SOILDEPTH

SliauoW (<!i0

’eraie

eep (>150 i ii (507150 cm) cm) i SOI[,T’#:m- —’= - Dcm) I Coarse sand & grav6 l

, Well-grad’ed sandsa a = a a

i Suiy elay & clay

l -.-…. …

l . . – –n -l’

i’o’ — ’ - ‘–

Suty sand, clayey sand,

l- ..-.-,

, silt & fine sand

% l ..-

’ SandyLoarri '

LayerofOrganieMatter? yes fi No tl Comments:

(iii)

Slopii0 Relatlvely flat (0-2.5%) CI Gentlc Slope (2J - 9%)

r a [I

Evident slope (10-25%) Steep (25% +)

Commems:

(iv) Is there a potemtial for impact on the surt?‘ace water quality leaviug the site? ‘Yesg

No[l

Is there potentIal for impact on the surface water qunntity leaving the s7tte’Z Yes ‘f:!

No [1

(v) :[s a greater sctback tltah 30 metres requjred? Yes [1

No P a

It” yes, recomtnendedsetbaelc ?metres

Page 95 of 97

10/2a/2BB4 11:17 Eil3547Ei474

CATARAG!Lll REGmN C.A

PAGE 85

]l: IS fflE PliOPOS:gD DEVF,LOPMF,NT…. XU a Provineimlly Significant Wetland?

Yes € ]%T0 @

Adjbcent(120m)toaProvinctallySi7nificautWetlsinid?Yes[I Nofi InaRegionaJlySignificantWetland(RSW)? Xes 0 No P

Adjacent (30na) to a RSW? Yes [1 No p

Jn/adjaeent to mn Uncvaluated Wetland? Yes [1 No ‘gl Adjaeent (30m) to an unevaluatedwetland? Yes [1 No ?

In an Area ot Naturml and 8cienti’flc Interest (ANSr)? Yes O No Fj0

Adj”*cent (50 m) to au ANSI? Yes [] No p

In the Habitat of Endaugered or Threatened species?Yes [1 No ‘$>

Adjacent (50 m) to a Habitat of .Endangered or Threatened Species? Yes [] No :p Unkuown [1

In significaut wildlife habitat? Yes [lNo [1

Adjacent (50 m) to the habitat ot Endangered/Threateoed Spseies? Yes [) NO [1 ?v

Unlcuownr8

Witlun 90 m of a high water mark (Xakes & rivers )? Yes p No CJ In fish habttat? Yes 0 No L

Adjacent (30 m) to fish habitat? Yes ‘Eki No 0

Adjacent(300m)toH[ghlySensttiveLakeTroutLa§e? 7es [7 No W

Adjaeent (90 m) to a Moderately Seusittve Lake Trout Lake? Yes € No pD lnal:l00yearflootlplain? Yes 0 NO ‘$ Ifyes- Mapped [1 TJnmapped [3 Adjgcent(15m)toaPloodplin? Yese NO D

InaSignificantWoodland?: Yes [] No [1

Adjaceut(50m)toasigni’ncautwoodlgnd?Yes[] NoD . ?Jnknowo d

InaSipniflcantVaueyland?: Yes [1 No7

Adjacent (50 m:) to n 8igniticam Valleyland? Yes- D No p@ Unknown [:I

Subject to a potential erosion hazard? Yes [I No u

Adjacent (10 m) to a poteutial erosion bazard? Yes [1 No p

Page 96 of 97

lel/2el/2a04 11:17 E)13547E)474

CATARAGlu? REG?CIN C.A

PAGE aEi

C: Is more tban 25% or the property’s shoreline developed? Yes 0 No ?’ Dils, ;Mop DET;]pD .S][TE gECZF2c gsEQsMENT (EIS) ;QUIRED TO DP,MONSTRATh APPROPRIATENESS OF 1’ROPO!‘RD D]ETflil,OPMENT? Yes l:l

No7

Ir yes:

a) which natural feature(s) should the assessment focug 00?

b)shouldthe?FJSbe:Scoped? Yes [] No €

:fe: :MITIGATIOY: The municipanty requires applicants who propose to develop witbin Environmcntauy 8ensitive Areas to enter into a Sjte Plan Agreement with the m’imnicjpality ‘which is )eegi8tered O:)1 fitle to the properly. This Agreement speciftes ‘basRc mitigation’

measures as contained iu Schedule il71*j aitaehed hereto- Based on your responses :to tbe questions in B above, would you recomm end additional mtttgating measures w?hicb would reduce the potential negative impact of development? If so, p?ease specSfy yonr concern and the suzgested mitigating mensure:

OTHER COMMENTS:

8ubmit comp?eted Evaluation to: Secretary-Treasurer

Soutlx Frontenac Tow.nship Comxnittee of Adjustment P.0. Box 100

8ydenmtn, ON KOH 2T0

(613) 376-3027 ext. 224(613) 376-6657 (fax) email: sfronten@,kiu7ston.net

Page 97 of 97

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.