Published November 14, 2019

Word Count 22438 words

Reading Time 106 min read

Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: November 14, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2019/Committee Of Adjustment - 14 Nov 2019 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE: 1.

7:00 PM, Thursday, November 14, 2019 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

a) 2.

Adoption of Agenda

a) 3.

Declaration of pecuniary interest

Approval of Minutes – October 10, 2019

a) 5.

New Consent Applications:

S-20-19-P (Granlund) (Cotnam) Location: Part Lot 12, Concession 11, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4708 Verona Sand Road. Purpose of Application: Consent for conveyance of a lot addition of approximately 28.3 hectares (70 acres) of vacant land from the subject property to enlarge a developed lot municipally known as 4710 Verona Sand Road. The retained lands at 4708 Verona Sands Road will be approximately 8.9 hectares (22 acres) in area and the road frontage will be maintained.

4 - 16

S-21-19-S (Sleeth) Location: Part Lot 14, Concession 9, being parts 2-4 on Plan 13R6237, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1978 Wellington Street. Purpose of Application: Consent for the creation of a new residential lot consisting of approximately 0.81 hectares (2 acres) with approximately 94.5 metres (310 feet) of frontage on Wellington Street and a depth of 66.75 metres (219 feet) from a developed lot municipally known as 1978 Wellington Street. The retained lands will retain the single family dwelling and accessory buildings and will be approximately 0.81 hectares (2 acres) in area with approximately 94.5 metres (310 feet) of frontage on Wellington Street.

17 - 31

S-22-19-B (1995926 Ontario Limited) (Greenslade & Black) Location: Part Lot 23 East, Part Lot 24 and Part Lot 25 South, Concession 9, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac. Purpose of Application: Consent for conveyance of a lot addition of approximately 28.33 hectares (70 acres) of vacant land from the subject property to enlarge a developed lot municipally known as 642 Burridge Road. The retained lands will be approximately 81 hectares (200 acres) in area with property frontage along McNeil Road, Lee Road, Belknap Lane & Maynard Lane.

32 - 48

S-23-19-S (1974658 Ontario Limited) (Card & Garrison) Location: Part Lots 32-34, Concession 7, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac. Purpose of Application: Consent for conveyance of a lot addition of approximately 0.31 hectares (0.76 acres) of vacant land from the subject property to enlarge a lot located at Part Lot 12 on Plan 1713.

49 - 59

Page 1 of 137

The retained lands will be approximately 27.59 hectares (68.18 acres) in area. 6.

New Minor Variance Applications:

MV-33-19-S (Chamberlain) Location: Part Lots 19 & 20, Concession 10, municipally known as 1671 Burnt Hills Road, Battersea, Dog Lake, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To reduce the waterbody setback from 30 metres (98.4 ft) to 27 metres (88.6 ft) to permit the construction of a garage 768 ft2 in the front yard. The applicant is seeking relief from Section 5.8.2a Flooding and Shoreline Erosion Hazards and Section 8.3.3 of the Waterfront Residential (RW) Zone which requires a 30 metre setback from the highwater mark. The applicant is also seeking relief to Section 5.24.2 Accessory Buildings for an accessory structure being a garage located in the front yard.

60 - 78

MV-34-19-P (Caird) Location: Part Lot 9, Concession 11, being Part 5 on Plan 13R3431, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 6097 Carlton Drive, Verona Lake. Purpose of Application: Official Plan Designation: Zoning: Urban Density – First Settlement Area Density Zone (URI Zone) Section 5.6.2.2: Setback Relief: 10m from the centre of the from Private Lanes and right-of-way to 0.91m (3 ft) from the Public Roads front yard Section 5.8.2a.: Setback for Relief: 30m from the highwater the Building or Structure – mark to 9.75m (32 ft) to the 30m setback to the highwater highwater mark of Verona Lake mark Section 5.10.2: Existing Relief: Increase in gross floor area building erected prior to the by 200ft2, and an increase to the date of passing of the By-law height of the building. and the building is less than 30m from the HWM, the building may be repaired, but no increase in floor area or height. Section 5.24.2: An Relief: Permit an accessory accessory building not part of building to be constructed in the the main building is to be projected front yard of a property. located to the rear or exterior of the main building. Section 14.3.1: Lot coverage Relief: Principal building coverage for the principal building for of 14.2% (increase of waterfront lots shall be a approximately 200ft2 for the maximum of 5%, principal dwelling and an increase in buildings shall be setback 7.5 approximately 330ft2 for the deck) m (24.6 ft) from the rear lot and a setback from the rear lot line line. of 7.3m (24 ft).

79 - 93

MV-35-19-P (Gee) Location: Part Lot 16, Concession 14, being Part 2 on Plan 13R8370, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4732 Snider Road. Purpose of Application: To permit the construction of an accessory building, being a detached garage in the projected front yard of a developed rural property (19.2 metres) 63 feet from front property

94 107

Page 2 of 137

line. The application is seeking relief from section 5.24.2 which requires accessory buildings to be located to the rear of the projected front or exterior side wall of the main building and section 7.3.2 which requires a minimum setback of 20 metres (65.6 feet) from the front lot line. d)

MV-36-19-L (Peck & Baxter) Location: Lot 5, Plan 1986 being Parts 22-24 on Plan 13R14914, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4586 Fox Ridge Trail, Sydenham Lake. Purpose of Application: To permit the construction of an accessory building, being a detached garage in the projected front yard of a developed residential property. The applicant is seeking relief from section 5.24.2 which requires accessory buildings to be located to the rear of the projected front or exterior side wall of the main building.

108 121

MV-37-19-B (Potvin) Location: Part Lot 18, Concession 4, being Parts 2-4 on Plan 13R4656, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 21A Bayshore Lane, Bobs Lake. Purpose of Application: To reduce the waterbody setback from 30 metres (98.4 feet) to 25.9 metres (85 feet) to permit the reconstruction of a one storey seasonal dwelling, that was destroyed by a fire, on the subject property. The applicant is seeking relief from Section 10.3.1 Limited Service Residential – Waterfront Zone Regulations and Section 5.8.2 a) Flooding and Shoreline Erosion Hazards which both require a 30 metre (98.4 feet) setback from the highwater mark and Section 5.10.2 which does not permit enlargement of gross floor area, increase in height and does not allow living space to be added below grade for existing buildings within 30 metres (98.4 feet) of a Waterbody or Watercourse.

122 137

Other Business

Adjournment

Page 3 of 137

:Em.8:

. Em:

Page 4 of 137

i’~<

’.J\

I5a

,.w'

Page 5 of 137

Mk:

WVW

.,x.

(3,

5._,>R~.

.H%..,.N

. .

Page 6 of 137

…J_

.®

mcurNw

®

mm 02

®

®Z

wo. . cw

moof

Qmo_

U®Q

mzzmn c ._.

2 .m

mm vm

< 4

Page 7 of 137

u: 0.“

o.E«m

_msq

B:om

osmm.

:mn_ c<

Um:

Page 8 of 137

Page 9 of 137

FRONTENAC

atimde GeographicsGroup Ltd.

SJ E-I_W!h_Melwnf.MB?|lfy.$?|uI

*jTI

Page 10 of 137

‘

0.46

H710 09

Kilometers

'\4\§§’~‘S“"‘B \o’(?

ac 4 46

1.18956

I Thismap is a user generated static output from an Internet map-ping site and is for reference only. Data layersthat appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwisereliabl THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAWGATION

-ruv

Notes

Citations

Parcels

Legend

alwfy‘ .._o

Tc-uonto

van-2

’ Rmlxc-_ tel

Ottawa

\ All ~

ROAD VERONA SAND BELLROCK

Va n luve n L ake

Ver ona Lak e

ROA D

BANK STREET

Inset Map

Va n luve n L ake

VE DRI PLE MA

GRANLUND (COTNAM) S-20-19-P

ROAD

YORK ROAD

4708 VERONA SAND RD

Legend Granlund Property

Proposed Severance

Proposed Severance Benefitting Lot Parcel Fabric River / Stream Provincially Significant Wetlands

Waterbodies

Water Area, Permanent Wetland Area, Permanent

Benefitting Lot

Retained Lot

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 11 of 137

Scale 1:8,500

VERONA SAND ROAD

0 40 80

160

240

Meters UTM Projection NAD 83

320

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – CONSENT APPLICATION Report Date:

November 7, 2019

Application Nos: Owner: Location of Property:

S-20-19-P Granlund (Cotnam) Part Lot 12, Concession 11, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4708 Verona Sand Road Purpose of Application: Consent for a lot addition Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional consent be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:



enlarge abutting lot create new lot right-of-way / easement other:

Area Severed: 28.3 ha (70 ac)

approximately Official Plan Designation: Rural & Environmental Protection

Water Frontage: N/A

Zoning: Rural (RU)

Road Frontage: Existing maintained Area Retained: approximately 8.9 ha (22 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Rural (RU)

Water Frontage: N/A Road Frontage: Existing maintained

Review: This application:  Is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (s. 3(5) Planning Act);  Does not require a plan of subdivision for the proper and orderly development of the municipality (s. 53(1) Planning Act);  Conforms with section 51(24) of the Planning Act;  Conforms with the County of Frontenac Official Plan (3.3.2);  Conforms with the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (5.7);  Complies with the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 (or will comply subject to a standard condition of rezoning or minor variance); and  Has no unresolved objections/concerns raised (to date) from agencies or the public.

Page 12 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Proposal The purpose of this application is consent for the conveyance of a lot addition from an existing property at Part Lot 12, Concession 11, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4708 Verona Sand Road (see attached map) to be merged with an adjacent property to the south at Part Lot 12, Concession 11, Part 1 13R17931 municipally known as 4710 Verona Sand Road. The property at 4710 Verona Sand Road contains an existing single detached dwelling. The subject lands at 4708 Verona Sand Road contain an existing older single detached dwelling with outbuildings. The property lies within the regulated area of unevaluated wetland draining into Vanluven Lake. The grade of the property slopes from the existing house towards Verona Sand Road and at the north of the dwelling slopes gradually towards the fields, wooded areas and wetlands. No development is proposed at either 4708 or 4710 Verona Sand Road at this time. The owners of 4710 Verona Sand Road had indicated that the subject lands were historically part of a larger land holding and would like to maintain and protect the character of the natural environment of the lands to be merged with 4710 Verona Sand Road.

Agency Analysis and Comments Public Services Department – The application was not required to be circulated to Public Services as the existing entrance will be maintained at 4708 and 4710 Verona Sand Road. KFL&A Public Health – The application was not required to be circulated to the Health Unit as the existing septic system will not be impacted. Quinte Conservation – Comments from Quinte Conservation dated October 28, 2019 indicate that they have no objection to the application as presented. The lands lie within the regulated area of unnamed wetlands draining into Vanluven Lake. The owners will need to apply to the Conservation Authority for a permit prior to development for development within 120 metres of any wetland boundary and within 45 metres of the seasonal high water mark/top of bank from any watercourse (no development is proposed for the lands). Staff are satisfied that and Section 2.1 Natural Heritage and Section 3.1 Natural Hazards of the Provincial Policy Statement have been addressed. Public Comments – No comments have been received from the public to date.

Conclusion The consent application conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement, County Official Plan and South Frontenac Official Plan. The lot addition is not required to be rezoned. The lot addition will increase the lot area of the existing property at 4710 Verona Sand Road. The application is subject to the recommended conditions:

Recommended Conditions Conditions are a decision of the Committee of Adjustment, the conditions below are recommended. The final approved conditions will be included in the signed decision Expiry Period

Conditions imposed must be met within one year of the date of notice of decision, as required by Section 53(41) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended. If conditions are not fulfilled as prescribed within one year, the application shall be deemed to be refused. Provided the conditions and the Certificate of Official is stamped within one year. The application is valid for two years from the date the certificate was issued and the deed must be registered within two years of the issuance of the certificate of official.

Page 13 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Severed Lands 2. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-20-19-P shall be for a lot addition with an area of approximately +/- 28.3 ha (70 ac) to be conveyed only to 4710 Verona Sand Road (Roll no. 102908008015110). 3. The lands to be severed are for the purpose of a lot addition only to the adjacent lands described as Part Lot 12 Concession 11 RP 13R17931; Part 1 (PIN 3614-60299), municipally described as 4710 Verona Sand Road and any subsequent transfer, charge or other conveyance of the lands to be severed is subject to Section 50(3) (or subsection 50(5) if in a plan of subdivision) of the Planning Act. Neither the lands to be severed nor the adjacent lands are to be reconveyed without the other parcel unless a further consent is obtained. The owner shall cause the lands to be severed to be consolidated on title with the adjacent lands and for this condition to be entered into the parcel register as a restriction. Survey/Reference Plan or Registerable Description 4. An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands, and the Certificate of Official shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the date of Decision [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)]. Municipal Requirements 5. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment. 8. Where a violation of the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw is evident, the appropriate minor variance or rezoning be obtained to the satisfaction of the Municipality. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Attachments: Map of Granlund/Cotnam property Site Visit: November 1, 2019

Page 14 of 137

Q U I NT E C O NS ER V AT I O N - P L AN N I NG A C T R EV I EW QC File No. PL0254-2019 Municipality:

South Frontenac

Owner

Jeff Cotnam

Location:

4708 Verona Sand Road

Roll #:

10290800801510000000

Application Description:

Consent to Sever File No. S-20-19-P

Feature:

Unnamed Wetlands and watercourses draining into Vanluven Lake

Lot 12, Concession 11

Portland

Proposed lot addition with frontage onto Verona Sand Road

Planning Act - Natural Hazard policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and Quinte Conservation Planning Act Review policy Conservation Authorities have Provincially delegated responsibilities to represent Provincial interests regarding natural hazards under section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) (2014). Natural hazards include areas subject to flooding, prone to erosion, dynamic beaches and unstable bedrock. Generally the policies of the PPS direct development to areas outside of hazards lands. Staff are satisfied that the application as presented is consistent with section 3.1 of the PPS as there is sufficient area for development outside the flood hazard.

Comments:

Ontario Regulation #319/09 (Regulation of Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses The subject lands lie within the regulated area of unnamed wetlands and watercourses draining into Vanluven Lake (by virtue of Ontario Regulation #319/09 – Regulation of Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses). Please note that the owners will need to apply to the Conservation Authority for a permit prior to development (construction / filling/ excavation/ site grading) within 120 metres of any wetland boundary and within 45 metres of the seasonal high water mark/ top of bank (whichever is greater) from any watercourse. Quinte Region Source Protection Plan Quinte Conservation provides Risk Management services as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006 on behalf of member municipalities. Part of this is reviewing building and planning applications to ensure no new significant drinking water threats as outlined in the Quinte Region Source Protection Plan are created. Policies for significant threats in the Quinte Region Source Protection Plan are not applicable as the subject property lies outside of an intake protection zone or wellhead protection area for a municipal drinking water system. As such no Section 59 Clearance Notice is required. Page 1 of 2

Page 15 of 137

Planning Act - Natural Heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement Section 2.1 of the Natural Heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement protects features including (but not limited to); Provincially Significant Wetlands, significant woodlands and significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest. The subject lands do not lie within a Provincially Significant Wetland, or within an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. Further, an Environmental Impact Study was not provided with the current planning application, and we will not be requesting one. Staff are satisfied that the application as presented is consistent with the natural heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement. The proponent may wish to contact the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry for further information. Final Comments:

Quinte Conservation has no objection to the application as presented.

10/28/2019 Date

Christine Jennings Planning and Regulations Technician And:

Sharlene Richardson Regulations Officer

Page 2 of 2

Page 16 of 137

Page 17 of 137

6m:?mm

u.o._»®Z

<_m£m

,¢

m__omm.m_n_

m2<

:38

QW co wm?coi

§.m»

vmom co .Qmm?coi

uomoQo_n

m_._.Oz

=_vnm. __

mg… __2

o_»®:

2«EHé .m

Emma

m?coi

mEot of.

Page 18 of 137

.8.33

m58.38”: m _o?

Em.

zos 9. m

Page 19 of 137

Page 20 of 137

Page 21 of 137

Page 22 of 137

PU9|19/V\

1U90!J!U5!S J9l41O

PU9|19/V\

$U0!191!O

S9J.ON

<-Wu

S19/xgg

tqu":

K’-‘4J‘|-1

[411

pua6a’|

wetussessv

. H,

2;.

|.‘a‘]“,‘aI(ju.n,i

S|90J8d

/(poqJe1e/V\

J9J4“ElUJOZLMSd )ue|1a/V\1ueog;gu6gsAuepug/\oJd

Page 23 of 137

NO|J_VE)|A'/N

aoa aasn as OL LON SI dvw sum

0 LSZ’Z L

JO} 5: pure 9 1IS 6uIddeLu1a we 1u| u eLuo

SI d e LU s |l,[J_

Sjelawom

1!/ZV

4/>-‘ic

°:€£’«3r" -\

J}1I'1d 1“ 0 31915 paw J eua6 Jesne

3/V‘/77[()’7

960

rwrv}«9roc/my

[

3VNEU.NOH:l

P11dn0J9S9!ud€J5099epmum @ euaqdg’/(JeI|Ixnv JO1E‘3J9wqe/v\‘1795L’g9/v\

Page 24 of 137

v 1’»?

..>

é 7rv4//win,/:7" fr-:2=~A’; 7

rsea

SLEETH S-21-19-S

Batt e

Loug hboro ugh L a

Ramparts Rd

Inset Map

1978 WELLINGTON ST

Milburn Rd

Doris Smith Ln

Wellington St

Legend Sleeth Property Proposed Severance

Proposed Severance

Retained Lot

WELLINGT ON

Parcel Fabric River / Stream Provincially Significant Wetlands

Waterbodies

Water Area, Permanent

STREET

Wetland Area, Permanent

Page 25 of 137

Scale 1:1,591

0 5 10

20 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – CONSENT APPLICATION Report Date:

November 8, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

S-21-19-S Sleeth Part Lot 14, Concession 9, being Parts 2-4 on Plan 13R6237, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1978 Wellington Street Purpose of Application: Consent to create one new lot Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional consent be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:

enlarge abutting lot 

create new lot right-of-way / easement other:

Area Severed: 0.81 ha (2 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Frontage: 94.5m (310 ft)

Zoning: Rural

Wellington Street, Battersea Area Severed: 0.81 ha (2 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Frontage: 94.5m (310 ft)

Zoning: Rural

Wellington Street, Battersea

Review: This application:  Is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (s. 3(5) Planning Act);  Does not require a plan of subdivision for the proper and orderly development of the municipality (s. 53(1) Planning Act);  Conforms with section 51(24) of the Planning Act;  Conforms with the County of Frontenac Official Plan (3.3);  Conforms with the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (5.7 & 7.1);  Complies with the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 (or will comply subject to a standard condition of rezoning or minor variance); and  Has no unresolved objections/concerns raised (to date) from agencies or the public.

Proposal The purpose of this application is consent for the creation of a new approximately 0.81 ha (2 ac) residential lot with approximately 94.5 metres (310 ft) of frontage from an existing property at Part Lot 14, Concession 9, being Parts 2-4 on Plan 13R6237, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1978 Wellington Street (see attached map). The subject property is Page 26 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT located on the north side of Wellington Street east of the Village of Battersea outside the hamlet boundary. The retained western parcel consists of approximately 0.81 ha (2 ac) with approximately 94.5 metres (310 ft) of frontage and contains an existing residential dwelling with outbuildings located to the northeast of the home. The property slopes southeast towards Wellington Street and contains an existing row of trees that divide the property which provides a natural buffer from the existing dwelling located to the west. The property contains agricultural lands with mature trees surrounding the property to the southeast. The proposed new approximately 0.81 ha (2 ac) lot contains two existing small structures at the southwest corner of the site closer towards Wellington Street. An existing drive shed is located across from the subject lands along Wellington Street. The closest barn is approximately 490 metres from the property.

Agency Analysis and Comments Public Works Department – An entrance permit, for a new access, will be required to be located at the southeast portion of the proposed new lot at the building permit stage. The second entrance into the field, located to the west of the severed lot, is required to be removed. The applicant is required to provide a lot grading and drainage plan for development on the severed lands. The plan will be required to be submitted at the building permit stage for the construction of a new dwelling. Public Services recommends taking a road widening to achieve the 66 foot right of way. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority – Staff have indicated that they are not required to review the application as there does not appear to be any natural hazard or natural heritage features on the property. KFL&A Public Health – KFL&A Public Health comments dated November 1, 2019 indicate that the proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system. Soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct a sewage disposal system; specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. Public Comments – To date comments have not been received from the public.

Conclusion The consent application conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement, County Official Plan, South Frontenac Official Plan and Zoning By-law subject to the recommended conditions:

Recommended Conditions Conditions are a decision of the Committee of Adjustment, the conditions below are recommended. The final approved conditions will be included in the signed decision

Recommended Conditions for the Consent Application S-21-19-S Expiry Period

Conditions imposed must be met within one year of the date of notice of decision, as required by Section 53(41) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended. If conditions are not fulfilled as prescribed within one year, the application shall be deemed to be refused. Provided the conditions are fulfilled within one year, the application is valid for two years from the date of notice of certificate issuance, the deed must be registered within two years of the issuance of the certificate of official. Severed Lands
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-21-19-S shall be for the creation of one new lot with an area of approximately 0.81 ha (2 ac) with approximately 94.5 metres (310 ft) of vacant land with approximately 94.5 metres (310 ft) of frontage along Wellington Street. Page 27 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Survey/Reference Plan or Registerable Description 3. An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands, and the Certificate of Official shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the date that “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)]. 4. The surveyor or applicant shall submit the draft Reference Plan electronically or in paper form for review and approval by planning staff prior to depositing the Reference Plan with the Land Registry Office. Road Widening 5. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in Condition #3 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road to be 66 feet. If such width is less than 66 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to ensure there is a 66 foot road allowance; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. Municipal Requirements 6. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 7. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the parcel to be severed through Consent Applications S-21-19-S, in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 8. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they shall be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 9. The Owner shall submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through Consent Application S-21-19-S. 10. The well driller who prepares the well driller’s report referred to in condition # 9 shall also provide a copy of the drawn down and recovery of the closest well that was collected by the Page 28 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT well driller at the time of the new well pump test in accordance with D-5-5 Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment, demonstrating that the well on the new proposed lot would not detrimentally impact on the closest existing well. If the adjacent well owner(s) do not wish to have their well tested for interference, a letter signed by the adjacent homeowner is required that indicates that they do not wish to have their well tested. OR A basic Hydrogeological Assessment signed by a Professional Engineer or Professional Geoscientist will be required for the new well in accordance with D-5-5 Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment. 11. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the Township to be registered on title to the severed parcel to address the development of the lot, including lot grading and drainage. Zoning 12. Where a violation of the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw is evident, the appropriate minor variance or rezoning be obtained to the satisfaction of the Municipality. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Attachments: Map of Sleeth property Site Visit: November 1, 2019

Page 29 of 137

Page 30 of 137

Report from Roads to Committee of Adjustment S-21-19-S Application Number: ___________________________________________________

Paul & Jeff Sleeth Applicant’s Name: _____________________________________________________

9 14 Storrington_____ Concession: _________________ Lot: _______________District:

1978 Wellington Street Road: ________________________________________________________________ Road Maintenance:

✔ Year-round □

Seasonal □

Sight Lines: Are there adequate sight lines for the entrance?

Yes □

✔ No □

If no, what changes would be required to improve sight lines? Entrance on a corner. Public Services recommends taking additional widening to achieve 66 foot ROW.

Road Conditions:

Are there any special drainage/ditching concerns related to creation of new lot(s)? ✔ ✔ Yes □ No □ If yes, what action is the applicant required to take?

A lot grading and drainage plan shall be submitted.

Is the overall road condition adequate to serve increased development/traffic? Yes □ No □ ✔ If no, please explain, and indicate if there are any measures that could be taken to correct the inadequacies.

Road Widening Required? Yes □ No □ ✔ Any specific requirement? Widen to achieve 66 foot ROW

Approved by the Public Services? Yes □ Yes, with conditions □ No □ ✔ If yes, with conditions, please describe conditions below. The second entrance to the property on the West end into the field is to be removed. The existing entrance on the East end is to be used as the sole entrance.

Signature on behalf of Public Services

November 5, 2019

Date

Page 31 of 137

_:m.8:

E? Em;

Page 32 of 137

:_Emm

O|_ »®Z

wwmo_n_

mm:<

:38

m» co

mm?coi

8¢

mmmEo.n

Umwoaoi

h .m.

_uum OZ

_o.. :.

®:

r_._.

coi

.:.

Page 33 of 137

\§.\f::,

3”

x s§.o:

§:.o:

Page 34 of 137

xazx

3:.

.2.

5.. NF xW

®Z

03 02

.00

®£._:

05%§ Q

E0z

Cm 0000 Qav Q? .0

.._

Page 35 of 137

=:o::m

mag

B:om

:mm.

mqc<

um:

Page 36 of 137

Page 37 of 137

.. .

aim)»

u_sw.9

ass

u.>z an »n.M_.a

3.:

.. .

no…

.. .

0… am no.6

.3.

2..

:. , uh

B»

Sn»

..o:>zom

xnsuad

.§…”_….

Knsu?…

.2;

m2 o

«S

%nW.:2 9:nz>n :3 Q

in »m.mwnwm3>=<m 10: in

m§<m«

22:3 S

0 071 v.mOZ.—m2 ….8

?zonu

Hzo?m

5 2.

R233 Rzo?m

anzo?m

zo?m

18.6.

nogviu?m.

an oazcmzmu6

4:)…”

om§_.._o>H

‘awn

3.:

S)m

3..

H»

:3.

ttau:

3.2.3.

a€mc»<m<o.G

mimic

c?an

2.523

sA.§..ea

.1:.lu

CD.)

9:3.

tzuori

5:3

3 N2

o.rw 139.

:9‘

19.33

vi»

Sub zo?

.:§u=

3.3 5:5 .93..

UNb WI H a 5..

niurm?o

0.3159

33¢:

was ; <93

__w«

nE.=.R

38.5

zsi?axsa

8329 in Ii!

2……

u§<m<

Amc?axn 9:5 Ezn

N. in

Zm 9.3? 26 nix Em nonwmn. :6 2 >ona.65om wcx<m3. in 52: 2:: in w=m<n2. in xmnciaozm zzun Sun» Eng, S5 .5 in in

Rxsl

wo:.o¥2n

no::_o2m

ommm?zozm. 5:

ommmw?o xnnnmnzon

mmn?zmn?a .5 one En nnoezu Eu 0») oozmzmumotn 1 >29 on #233 m4 in

_mcx<n<S.m

:c_..=.:.2n

Qmiznnm

«no:

z5§amam:3_3.

znionx

ENE

nEo£.mm

Emtzonm Sm .2 zn?mm in 5 nsozo 9. Puoa.

93.28

=¥.:S

wcma.;… 95.

xcznxanm :6 wcan:>x. PFM. o….:: on R: E. n9. P xnmwmcm?in Cd: 95.

.2733. unw$_3:2

can.ama?u

ma!

E254

m.m< an!

fznmm

3.»:

1=x3.»_mm

znacanw

moczu Elcxmzu gozcznza W32 M. Ma… 2:65: =82 E… ma. .29 325:6 .2! mi

cu. snmq 522265. N9" 3 3» mmizn

uoza

mmzaza _.Sn

Szo?m

__.EmS:.2o

?z?nm

?zaam

mum umzo?m ma ?zo?w

?z?nm

O1 mmU_uO_N_u

on mos: _£oz?z>o

..oszm:_n

…monz.

mat."

OOcZ.:

Sim…»

O0_»>_uI_O

m.z_o_n>.=<on..:m

oozommmozm mmzmmz mk 0

zc

_.2 82ommm_ozm

u.>z on mcm<m<on

nQAMmm9

Kin:

3.5.3

. .. ..

C2.

.65 Eosz?

E…

93:.

… ..

_ ._ __ __.. _ _

can

Sen»

.x_u 3.!

.22:

__m2.n

3.3.3

Page 38 of 137 (fa:

u s

Page 39 of 137

Lot Addition

WGS_‘I9Bd_WEI7AMerrz(oI_A|n’I||ary_Spher! © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd.

Q FRONTBIAC —

m) m

gmm

500m

8&1m

Greenslade/Black

‘

“F ouzput i“‘c-m cenerated sa an Interns: mepprng site énd is for rfecence orny.Data layersthat appear on his map may or may not be ECCJFBIE, currenz, cr o:he’wise reiiabie THIS MAP IS NOT TO BEUSEDFOR NAVIGATION

Map 3 of 6 -a

Dlstance to wetlands

Notes

PSW 120 m Buffer

Provincially Signi?cant Wetlands

Legend

Page 40 of 137

_;umrmy_sphere

Lot Addition

WGS_1 9a4_W&_Merra1ot

momsmc —

amIn

600m

Greenslade/Black

‘

mas is a user generated static output T,‘om an nteme: ’nepp‘ng s‘:e and ‘s for ppear on this map may or may “.0: be accurate, curren; or otherwise re\iabJe THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USEDFOR NAVIGATION

1 : 15,000

Map 6 of 6

Notes

Inset Map

Briggs Ln

Mcneil Rd

s We

t Rd tp o r

Lee Rd Ia

wa h

Rd Garrett

Firehall Rd

Iaw ah

Green Bay Rd

1995926 ONTARIO LIMITED (Greenslade & Black) S-22-19-B

e Burridg

Lo we r

int

p Ln

x Fo

a Belkn

eL ac Sp

Wolfe Lake

la Pop

r Ln

fe ol W

Wolfe Lake

L nd rla

MCNEIL RD

a rd yn a M

Legend

1995926 ONTARIO LIMITED Property

Proposed Severance p Ln

Benefitting Lot (Black) Belkna

Parcel Fabric River / Stream Provincially Significant Wetlands

Burridge Rd

Waterbodies Retained Lot

Proposed Severance

Lee Rd

Benefitting Lot

Water Area, Permanent Wetland Area, Permanent

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Page 41 of 137

Mcneil Rd

While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Scale 1:11,000

0 37.575

150 Meters

225

300

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – CONSENT APPLICATION Report Date:

November 8, 2019

Application Nos: Owner: Location of Property:

S-22-19-B 1995926 Ontario Limited Part Lot 23 East, Part Lot 24 and Part Lot 25 South, Concession 9, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent for a lot addition Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional consent be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:

enlarge abutting lot 

create new lot right-of-way / easement other:

Area Severed: 70 ac (28.3 ha)

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Water Frontage: N/A

Zoning: Rural (RU)

Road Frontage: N/A Area Retained: 81 ha (200 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural & Environmental Protection

Water Frontage: Wolfe Lake Zoning: Rural (RU) & Environmental Protection Road Frontage: Existing (EP) Zones frontage maintained along McNeil Road, Lee Road, Belknap Lane Provincially Significant Wetland & 120 metre buffer and Maynard Lane

Proposal The purpose of this application is consent for the conveyance of a lot addition from an existing property at Part Lot 23 East, Part Lot 24 and Part Lot 25 South, Concession 9, District of Bedford, Page 42 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Township of South Frontenac (see attached map) to be merged with property at Part Lot 23, Concession 8 North, municipally known as 642 Burridge Road. The subject property is a vacant parcel consisting of approximately 116 ha (286.5 ac) and fronts onto Wolfe Lake. The lands contain provincially significant wetlands associated with the Wolfe Lake Complex. The wetlands are not located on the lands that are proposed to be merged with 642 Burridge Road. The property drains towards Wolfe Lake. There are watercourses and a small, unevaluated wetland indicated on the lands to be merged with 642 Burridge Road. The property at 642 Burridge Road contains an existing dwelling, barn and outbuildings. The lands to be merged are vacant agricultural lands. The property is to be enlarged and contain existing agricultural and wooded lands with no existing structures. The applicant has indicated that they wish to continue the use of the merged lands for agricultural purposes. The property at 642 Burridge Road is subject to an application for road closing (File RC-19-04). It is anticipated that the by-law to close the unopened road allowance and transfer to the Blacks and Greenslades for the road closing will be finalized at the November 19, 2019 meeting of Council. The unopened road allowance is located between 642 Burridge Road and the 28.3 ha (70 ac) of land to the east to be merged with 642 Burridge Road.

Agency Analysis and Comments Public Services Department – The application was not required to be circulated to Public Services as the existing entrance will be maintained at 642 Burridge Road. KFL&A Public Health – The application was not required to be circulated to the Health Unit as the existing septic system will not be impacted and will continue to be maintained at 642 Burridge Road. Rideau Valley Conservation Authority – The RVCA have indicated that they have no objection to the subject application as noted in their comments dated October 31, 2019 indicating that they have no concerns associated with Sections 2.1, 2.2, or 3.1 of the PPS. Should there be any proposed modifications to watercourses on the property, written permission is required from this office in accordance with Ontario Regulation 174/06 under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. RVCA strongly encourage the preservation of the wetlands and recommend actions for maintaining downstream water quality by reducing pollutant loadings, proper septic system maintenance and maximizing setbacks from the normal high water mark as indicated in the Rideau Lakes Study. Care should be taken to avoid land uses and practices that may inadvertently lead to undesirable effects on groundwater. This can be achieved by taking advantage of the RVCA’s Rural Clean Water Program. Public Comments – No comments have been received from the public to date.

Conclusion The consent application conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement, County Official Plan and South Frontenac Official Plan. The lot addition is not required to be rezoned. The lot addition will increase the lot area of the existing property at 642 Burridge Road. The application is subject to the recommended conditions:

Conditions imposed must be met within one year of the date of notice of decision, as required by Section 53(41) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended. If conditions are not fulfilled as prescribed within one year, the application shall be deemed to be refused. Provided the conditions and the Certificate of Official is stamped within one year. The application is valid for two years from the date the certificate was given and the deed must be registered within two years of the issuance of the certificate of official. Page 43 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Severed Lands 2. The land to be severed by Consent Application S-22-19-B shall be for a lot addition with an area of approximately 70 +/- acres to be conveyed only to 642 Burridge Road (Roll no. 102901001003700). 3. The lands to be severed are for the purpose of a lot addition only to the adjacent lands described as Part Lot 23 Concession 8 North (PIN 36240-0200), municipally described as 642 Burridge Road and any subsequent transfer, charge or other conveyance of the lands to be severed is subject to Section 50(3) (or subsection 50(5) if in a plan of subdivision) of the Planning Act. Neither the lands to be severed nor the adjacent lands are to be reconveyed without the other parcel unless a further consent is obtained. The owner shall cause the lands to be severed to be consolidated on title with the adjacent lands and for this condition to be entered into the parcel register as a restriction. Survey/Reference Plan or Registerable Description 4. An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands, and the Certificate of Official shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the date of Decision [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)]. Road Widening 5. The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in Condition #3 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds. Municipal Requirements 6. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 7. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. Page 44 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment.
Where a violation of the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw is evident, the appropriate minor variance or rezoning be obtained to the satisfaction of the Municipality.
Prior to the stamping of the deeds for S-22-19-B, the transfer of the portion of road allowance involved in the road closing application RC-19-04, shall be transferred to the property proposed to be enlarged by this severance. The Black/Greenslade application is required to be finalized for the road closing application file RC-19-04 (Black/Greenslade). Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Attachments: Map of 1995926 Ontario Limited property Site Visit: June 6, 2019

Page 45 of 137

October 31, 2019 19-SFR-SEV-0029 (BEDFORD)

Township of South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment P.O. Box 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 Attention:

Michelle Hannah

Subject:

1995926 Ontario Limited; Application S-22-19-B – Part Lot 24 and 25 South, Concession 9; Former Township of Bedford, Now the Township of South Frontenac; Roll Number: 1029010010093000000 ——————————————————————————————————————————Dear Ms. Hannah, The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) has reviewed the subject application within the context of:

Section 2.1 Natural Heritage, 2.2 Water and 3.1 Natural Hazards of the Provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of the Planning Act; The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (“Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourses” regulation 174/06 under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act); The Rideau Lakes – Wolfe Lake Catchment Report;, The Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Plan;

The Proposal The RVCA understands this proposal to be for an addition-to-lot severance where approximately 25.2 hectares will be added from the subject property to 642 Burridge Road. The Property The lot from which the 28.3 hectares will come does not have an address. It is approximately 107 hectares and fronts onto Wolfe Lake. There are several provincially significant wetlands

Page 46 of 137

associated with the Wolfe Lake Complex located on it, but it does not appear that these wetlands are proposed to be included in the lands to be added to 642 Burridge Road. There are watercourses and several small, unevaluated wetlands indicated on the lands to be transferred to 642 Burridge Road and which were observed during a site visit to the property. There is a large swath of organic soils indicated, although it does not appear that these are within the lands to be added to 642 Burridge Road. Review Comments and Recommendations Provincial Policy Statement Our office has no concerns associated with Sections 2.1, 2.2 or 3.1 of the PPS as a result of this proposed lot addition. Ontario Regulation 174/06 The applicants should be aware that any watercourses on the subject property are regulated under Ontario Regulation 174/06. As such, should any modifications to watercourses be proposed, prior written permission is required from our office in accordance with our regulation (Development, Interference with Wetlands, Alterations to Shoreline and Watercourses) made under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. Unevaluated Wetlands Unevaluated wetlands are currently required to be regulated under the Conservation Authorities Act. Given the numerous benefits of all wetlands, the Conservation Authority strongly encourages their preservation. These benefits include: attenuation of flood water; serving as a groundwater recharge/discharge area and providing a more stable source of water during low water conditions; filtering our drinking water; and providing habitat to many species of plants and animals (often including fish). The RVCA is in the process of reviewing the implementation of our policies and procedures to comply with the updated Conservation Authorities Act. For further information on these changes please see the following link: http://conservationontario.ca/policy-priorities/conservation-authorities-act/. Rideau Lakes – Wolfe Lake Catchment Report Ultimately, this property drains towards Wolfe Lake. Therefore, reference has been made to that catchment report for indications of downstream water quality and recommended actions. The water quality report for Wolfe Lake is “fair” according to the Catchment Report. Nutrient concentrations are generally low-moderate according to the Provincial Water Quality Objectives (PWQO) with few exceedances. Efforts such as the diversion of runoff and enhanced shoreline buffers are important to continue to protect and enhance water quality and reduce future nutrient increases. This is particularly important for roadways and dwellings that border the lake. Residents can help minimize their impact on the lake by reducing nutrient inputs through practices such as proper septic maintenance, keeping shorelines natural and using phosphate free soaps and detergents. Wolfe Lake is characterized by warm water fish species. Opportunities for action within Wolfe Lake are indicated as being:

Page 2 of 3

Page 47 of 137

• • •

Reduce pollutant loadings to Wolfe Lake through application of shoreline and stormwater best management practices, including consideration of low impact development methods. Proper septic system maintenance, Maximizing setbacks from the normal highwater mark as indicated in the Rideau Lakes Study.

Source Water Protection The subject property is also identified as overlying a highly vulnerable aquifer. These are aquifers that are vulnerable to surface contaminants due to thin or absent soils overlying bedrock that may be fractured. Where these conditions exist, it may be possible for contaminants to enter drinking ground water supplies. For this reason, care should be taken to avoid land uses and practices that may inadvertently lead to undesirable effects on groundwater. Recommendations The RVCA would recommend that the owners of the recipient lots consider taking advantage of the RVCA’s Rural Clean Water Program. RVCA staff can assist with preparing Forest Management Plans or providing information on the Trees for Tomorrow Program. If the applicants are interested in this service they should contact Scott Danford (scott.danford@rvca.ca or 613-692-3571 x 1175) or Derek Matheson (derek.matheson@rvca.ca or 613-692-3571 x 1134) at our Manotick office. This is a voluntary program. Conclusions In conclusion, The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority has no objection to the subject application. The RVCA would like its comments and recommendations noted on any decision from the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (613) 267-5353 x 131 should you have any questions. Please advise us on the Committee’s decision respecting this application or any changes in the status of the application. Yours truly,

Phil Mosher Planner RPP cc – Barry Greenslade, agent cc – Joanne McGurn, KFLPHA cc – Bruce Maynard, owner

Page 3 of 3

Page 48 of 137

Page 49 of 137

U6596m

0:. 262

6w66_n_ m®._<

£36

co mmEo.u_

om :0 m6Eo_n_

6moqo.n_

_uvm Oz

…

Q®D

£._.

Page 50 of 137

aimf

3”

w__\§.O3

SE0:

o:_$ ..

….i,m,..v

Page 51 of 137

d,.~.>,.:.u.W.; ..2B)&w£.< \uUQ

.3.

och Ne

mmc.

gon .3

w m..m»

®Z

mo.

.._

cam

oom

we.

_:c9

wzawn

9.2. 9:

ENZ

m wv o__oc_.m

Page 52 of 137

Page 53 of 137

Page 54 of 137

FRONTENAC

fie;/3;’;:;:t:“ /L?/«1—IT’f)

““1"”’*”

Cna?ons

Assessment Parcels

Legend

' !.—>!”-"-I‘

{…,,;../e-

T-._;| :,u’|{::-

’::‘t!-3‘I-1!

‘

6‘

Alt

L!-

’_

41 ‘~,- a-. ~

Page 55 of 137

X53335.

;Q$.M_\m

.sh

‘

—————

,_.’,x

m’

7'0. BK

.,,

E’,3;

‘cg

.45

1??

‘~\

‘3

.–

HIo

W17

9??

—

31.0515. I3: o

Ga‘ 3 “E01 m‘

9:71’

‘P53;

Nr -

~°2a.’:s’

.»3s.oc.-’«.‘ “0

§”;~_,,.C? .6

.\l

m‘

g’

DJ “J

5’””

“Q

U! O

“‘

J07

“°

.9 H

.‘2:;:.’::

—~

—

”

\J\

Iu:

“I

_“

,P§

N‘

—x

‘

w E

‘

“J

U3 0

57 O0

U’)!/I

7‘

«D

gas

833

rrf

.3 z

55.03 N0-27’ ow

C=_18”.‘o’§

-72

:‘\vl

-‘

m‘ NO'27'10

0.27‘ 1 O

18,9”:

2 u:

‘8 g

“5 4034-:E

.575 A

637°-.

&%‘7C*"’2z :53 /9&5”:

4'2 ~19

~%»4 ?g

91” 3»

cy‘ 6‘014’

E/.% 0.00%,2;

4 \

19510

57-00

O'27'1O

€:3:

D 0

gt ‘3

:5>1 :0 \

D E

-—-moo…

E”

m 0’)

—=

49 °%«» am.

\I‘’

_‘

µ K

a al ah

1974658 ONTARIO LIMITED (Card & Garrison) S-23-19-S

LAKEFIELD DR

na Ko

Legend

Benefitting Lot (Card & Garrison)

Proposed Severance m Ka

Proposed_Severance 1974658 ONTARIO LIMITED Property

ue en v A

Parcel Fabric

River / Stream

Collins Lake

Benefitting Lot

Provincially Significant Wetlands

Waterbodies

Retained Lot

Wetland Area, Permanent

Inset Map

Davidson Rd

hR d

Buc k

Holmes Rd Lakefield Dr

Page 56 of 137

fi ke La

d el

n Ko

Poi

nt L

Collin s Lake

Pe rt

le ap M

C st re

Water Area, Permanent

Scale 1:6,000

0 20 40

80 Meters

120 160

UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – CONSENT APPLICATION Report Date:

November 7, 2019

Application Nos: Owner: Location of Property:

S-23-19-S 1974658 Ont. Ltd. (Card & Garrison) Part Lot 32-34, Concession 7, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, Collins Lake Purpose of Application: Consent for a lot addition Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional consent be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:



enlarge abutting lot create new lot right-of-way / easement other:

Area Severed: 0.31 ha (0.76 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Water Frontage: 0

Zoning: Rural (RU)

Road Frontage: approximately Provincially Signification Wetland & 120 metre 22 metres along Maple Crest buffer Court & approximately 87.18 metres along Lakefield Drive Area Retained: 68.18 ha (27.59 ac)

Official Plan Designation: Rural & Environmental Protection

Water Frontage: approx. 2,350 m (7,710 ft) along Collins Lake

Zoning: Rural (RU) Environmental Protection (EP) Zones

Road Frontage: Lakefield Drive

Provincially Significant Wetlands & 120 metre buffer

Parcel to be Enlarged

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Plan 1713 Part Lot 12, Lyons Landing

Zoning: Residential (R) Zone

Review: This application:  Is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (s. 3(5) Planning Act);  Does not require a plan of subdivision for the proper and orderly development of the municipality (s. 53(1) Planning Act);  Conforms with section 51(24) of the Planning Act;  Conforms with the County of Frontenac Official Plan (3.3.3);  Conforms with the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (5.7 & 7.0);  Complies with the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 (or will comply subject to a standard condition of rezoning or minor variance); and Page 57 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT  Has no unresolved objections/concerns raised (to date) from agencies or the public.

Proposal The purpose of this application is consent for the lot addition parallel from an existing property at Part Lots 32-34, Concession 7, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac (see attached map) to enlarge the existing Lot at Part Lot 12 on Plan 1713, Lyons Landing. The subject lands are located at the southeast corner of Maple Crest Court and Lakefield Drive and are located along the west shore of Collins Lake. The lands to be merged are vacant and are zoned Rural and Environmental Protection Zone. The lands to be transferred is located between the north lot line of Part Lot 12 and the road allowance for Lakefield Drive and also includes a strip of land being taken from the rear lot line. The applicants have indicated that the purpose of the lot addition is to transfer an unusable portion of land to enlarge a lot in the Lyons Landing Subdivision in the hopes of eliminating trespassing that has historically occurred on the property.

Agency Analysis and Comments Public Services Department – The application was not required to be circulated to Public Services at this time. KFL&A Public Health – The application was not required to be circulated to the Health Unit as a septic system is not proposed at this time. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority – The application was not required to be circulated to the CRCA based on meeting with the applicant previously. In correspondence received July 25, 2019 staff of the CRCA had indicated that they had no concerns and were not required to be circulated. Public Comments – One member of the public called on November 4, 2019 requesting additional information.

Conclusion The consent application conforms with the Provincial Policy Statement, County Official Plan and South Frontenac Official Plan. The lot addition is required to be rezoned from the Rural Zone to the Residential (R) Zone. The lot addition will increase the lot area of the existing property at Plan 1713 in Lyons Landing. The application is subject to the recommended conditions:

Conditions imposed must be met within one year of the date of notice of decision, as required by Section 53(41) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended. If conditions are not fulfilled as prescribed within one year, the application shall be deemed to be refused. Provided the conditions and the Certificate of Official is stamped within one year. The application is valid for two years from the date of the certificate issuance and the deed must be registered within two years of the issuance of the certificate of official. Severed Lands
The land to be severed by Consent Application S-23-19-S shall be for a lot addition with an area of approximately 0.31 ha (0.76 +/- ac) to be conveyed only to Part Lot 12 on Plan 1713, Lyons Landing (Roll no. 102906001006414).
The lands to be severed are for the purpose of a lot addition only to the adjacent lands described as Part Lot 12 on Plan 1713 Lyons Landing (PIN 36294-0662 and any subsequent Page 58 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT transfer, charge or other conveyance of the lands to be severed is subject to Section 50(3) (or subsection 50(5) if in a plan of subdivision) of the Planning Act. Neither the lands to be severed nor the adjacent lands are to be reconveyed without the other parcel unless a further consent is obtained. The owner shall cause the lands to be severed to be consolidated on title with the adjacent lands and for this condition to be entered into the parcel register as a restriction. Survey/Reference Plan or Registerable Description 4. An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands, and the Certificate of Official shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the date of Decision [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)]. Municipal Requirements 5. Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds. 6. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. 7. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment. 8. Where a violation of the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw is evident, the appropriate minor variance or rezoning be obtained to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 9. Prior to the stamping of the deeds, the applicant shall rezone the lot addition from the portion of lands located in the Rural (RU) Zone to the Residential (R) Zone to ensure that the entire property at Part Lot 12 on Plan 1713 is consistently in the Residential (R) Zone. Please see the Township’s Planning Department to begin this process. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Attachments: Map of 1974658 Ontario Limited property Site Visit: November 1, 2019

Page 59 of 137

Page 60 of 137

m:q.

8 _m:q E.mo..

Page 61 of 137

“?n

‘w’t

“u‘\

‘.4-

Page 62 of 137

Page 63 of 137

Page 64 of 137

Page 65 of 137

Page 66 of 137

JLO7 Page 67 of 137

Page 68 of 137

GRADE

‘F

F) NISHEDROOF

FINISHED SLAB

TOP or cuna

\Wl‘Wm

—

“’

-.~4

TOP OF PLATES

‘ca

is‘

ént

-a’

mu Gr2/Jr:

I9’

1 /B”-I —-0"

RIGHT

Fa/am_/

“

LEVATION

Eulldlnq

anlwn «ll-?lu

Ihkh

mam.

?at

O?lclal

v m-….e and n. rupuIIlI1|yVM

-Imn

mu-4 aulhevixnd n,

can

5127}

c:..mlx-n-mI.w-n

LEVATIONS

DRAWINGNAME

1-23-j

sum. rmmnoc

Ln Ohambdlaln :7: Buml on: load

Proomud omgu

PROJECT NAME

z-ml: Ian

5&7 swan no-:4I-Iarwomnh man: (:43) 3040:)

Nam nay: ca-vuau

Drgunlzallon CRAIG LEEMAN

Han

LOT INFORMATION

nan:

lav um um; pm-anam so .4 Im 7..-mu

era; Lumen:

wphcallm.

«am:

tn. Gnlgw

Ml Iv cmwuelbn

m. many . xmidmd mum, ma

Aikn:

m momma mmIha 2:12 Onlzno Bulldmg cm

HIIIHJIHIJI WW

—\

/a–u’—o’

Meta!cox‘

REA ELEVATION

48’><36"

:3 "

amp

= Vnu! km

FRONT ELEVATION

1!|

1 /B"-I ‘—o’

m_/ Perm

III

1 5’-0"x1 0’-0“

@ LEFT ELEVATION 1 /B"-I

/‘/maloau‘ '

I ‘ 1d /W41 M“

}

mm dvawmgs cue designed

Skandurd Note:

Page 69 of 137

I A5

-0”

,,,,,,.

—

2 4,

0..

Engineered *‘““°’

4" 3 ZMPA cancre te .

cur sntraprnent 3 5—8% s.,,p,d to

“

Scissovlmss

Eng ineered truss @ 24" o.c.

LOOR 3/15’

2- 2"x10’ header

A W 3’—5’

12’-0’

‘

,V,

. E ‘

,,1 ,

;

‘,

0.,

12’—o’

2,_

VA…

A‘.

J 1 A3

Wm”

aunan.-.g Official and mu. mpamny «. um. um m:

swam swncn

NR5‘ “V

RECEFTACLE

nxvu?s EXTERIOR

FIXIURE

. czrums

val

mun

can

nus Hounnxllh um

ovc_Idn?aoQrvM.¢uIvI

(mun:-7m

Chamb|v1a’n

FLOOR P LAN MAIN FLOOR

DRAWINGNAME

am Nlv load sun rrmuum at

PROJECT NAME Propond ooeoqc

"”

K-mi:

PM»:

33:1 Sconhn

03709510Nam: ?nlwu

Orgunlzu?on crmc LEEMAN

2-32-1-

Ha: lot

LOT INFORMATION

mm;

mag Lnommz tam

upnncuum.

mu m auwunm mum mnama ly tax Im mm. pnrmll an In «up-v ama -l|h’n :0 day: .: nu wmu

mu.

ovdanlio-1 and man! u. r«:Ai-Imh -4 an M moam:on a uoilqmx dliywn nu. m unidnnd mummy on:

m. a..;… ocllv?la.

I mined

Attn:

-0-

ELECTRICALLEGEND

These drawings are doligned In accordance with Ihe 2012 Oriario Buikfn? Code

Stundur dN oke:

Inset Map

Cranesnest Lake

clif nn f Ln

µ CHAMBERLAIN MV-33-19-S

Cranesnest Lake

tel ris Ch Ln

Huntb

d sR

B A urn t

ach L n

ll Hi

Osborn e Ln

Battersea Rd

Cranesnest Lake Cranesnest Lake

1671 BURNT HILLS RD

Dog Lake

Legend Chamberlain Property Parcel Fabric Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

Waterbody River/ Stream

B urnt Hills Rd

Dog Lake

Roads

Arterial Expressway / Highway Local / Street

bo Os

rn e

b Hunt

Page 70 of 137

Scale 1:5,000

n ncliff L An

0 20 40

120

Meters UTM Projection NAD 83

160

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR VARIANCE – PLANNING REPORT Report Date:

November 7, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-33-19-S Lee Chamberlain (Gay Chamberlain) Part Lots 19 & 20 Concession 10, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1671 Burnt Hills Road, Dog Lake Purpose of Application: To vary Section 5.8.2 a, Section 8.3.3 & 5.24.2 of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional approval be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:

 zoning relief for construction of a new structure zoning relief for replacement to an existing structure zoning relief for other

Official Plan Designation: Rural

Dog Lake & Rideau Canal Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site

Zoning: Waterfront Residential (RW) Zone

Zoning Relief Requested:

Section 5.8.2a: Flooding and Shoreline Erosion Hazards

Relief: 30 metres from the highwater mark to 27 metres to the highwater mark of Dog Lake for the construction of a garage

Section 5.24.2: Accessory Buildings for an accessory structure being a garage located in the front yard

Relief: Permit a garage in the front yard, setback 20 metres from the front lot line

Section 8.3.3: RW for the Principal Building – 30m setback to the highwater mark

Relief: 30 metres from the highwater mark to 27 metres to the highwater mark of Dog Lake for the construction of a garage

Review: This application:  Is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (s. 3(5) Planning Act);  Conforms with the general intent and purpose of the County of Frontenac Official Plan;  Conforms with the general intent and purpose of the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan;  Complies with the general intent and purpose of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 (or will comply subject to approval for the minor variance);  Is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question; and  Is minor.

Page 71 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Proposal An application for minor variance has been submitted to permit the construction of a one storey garage in the front yard consisting of 768 ft2 to be constructed 27 metres from the highwater mark of Dog Lake. The garage is proposed to be 6.0 metres in height and will comply with the required height of 6.0 metres for an accessory building. No plumbing fixtures are proposed for the garage. The property contains an existing dwelling and sleeping cabin located at Part Lots 19 & 20, Concession 10, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1671 Burnt Hills Road, Battersea, Dog Lake (see attached map). The property is located on the north shore of Dog Lake. The topography of the property is described as rising up steeply from the shoreline to the location of the existing dwelling, then continuing to rise slowing in a northly direction until reaching a high ridge of land between the proposed location of the garage and Burnt Hills Road. Under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act there are four tests a minor variance must meet. A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests: • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? • Is the application desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question? • Is the application minor?

Background The subject property is a waterfront lot with 365.7 metres (1200 feet) of waterfrontage along Dog Lake and approximately 304.8 metres (1000 feet) along Burnt Hills Road and consists of 6.25 acres (2.53 ha) in area. The property is located on the south side of Burnt Hills Road. As the property has significant topography changes and is constrained with the existing hydro line and granite rock outcropping, the proposed location of the garage is the most appropriate location on the lot. The current owners purchased the property in October 2018. The dwelling was constructed in approximately 2006. The property has an existing septic system closer to the road and well adjacent to the house. The existing sleeping cabin is located to the south of the dwelling. The applicant has indicated that services will not be extended to the garage. The property has a number of existing mature trees and two existing docks at the waterfront. The surrounding area contains existing seasonal and year round dwellings located along the shoreline of Dog Lake in proximity to this site.

Planning Analysis Agency Analysis and Comments KFL&A Public Health – The application was not circulated to the Health Unit as the septic system is located northwest of the proposed garage which will be closer to the existing dwelling. Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT) – Comments dated October 24, 2019 from the RWDRT indicate the main interests of the RWDRT are the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values of the Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site. Staff have no objections to the approval of MV-33-19-S based on their consideration for natural hazards, natural heritage and water quality and quantity protection policies. The proposed development will require a permit from the CRCA as per Ontario Regulation 148/06 prior to development taking place as the proposed development is within 15 metres of the top of valley for Dog Lake. Staff recommend that roof runoff be directed away from the lake if possible. Public Comments – At the time of the writing of this report, no comments have been received from the public.

Page 72 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Conclusion The proposed application to permit the construction of a one storey garage consisting of 768 ft2 to be constructed 27 metres from the high water mark of Dog Lake to the north of the existing dwelling located at Part Lots 19 & 20, Concession 10, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 1671 Burnt Hills Road, Battersea, Dog Lake, meets the four tests for a minor variance: • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan as the proposed garage will be constructed to the west of the existing single detached dwelling located on the rural waterfront property. The garage will be located as far back as possible from the waterfront given the constraints on the lot. • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The proposed dwelling complies with the zoning provisions in the Zoning By-law for the RW Zone with the exception of the setback to the highwater mark and garage located in the front yard. Achieving the 30 metre setback would be difficult due to the constraints and topography of the lot. The CRCA have indicated that they have no objection to the approval of the minor variance and are happy to see the visual character of the landscape from the water maintained as the garage will be constructed behind the existing dwelling. • The variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question as the garage will be further from the waterfront than existing buildings on the property and will not be visible from the waterfront. • The variance is minor as the proposal seeks to maintain the waterbody setback given the location of the existing dwelling, sleeping cabin and septic system. With the addition of the garage, the lot will continue to be under the 5% lot coverage permitted by the RW Zone.

Recommended Conditions Conditions are a decision of the Committee of Adjustment, the conditions below are recommended. The final approved conditions will be included in the signed decision

The Minor variance is for the construction of a one storey garage consisting of 768m2 to be constructed to the west of an existing single detached dwelling, as per the drawings submitted with MV-33-19-S. The garage will be 27 metres to the highwater mark of Dog Lake in the Waterfront Residential (RW) Zone.
The applicant is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the matters outlined in the October 24, 2019 of the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT) and requirements of the Township: 

The Owner shall ensure that roof runoff is directed away from Dog Lake.

The Owner is required to obtain a permit prior to development commencing from the CRCA under Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by the CRCA.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
Minor variance MV-33-19-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Page 73 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: November 1, 2019 Attachments: Map of the Chamberlain property

Page 74 of 137

idagm 3.t€1’VV_ay

Review Team October 24, 2019 Sent by Email Ms. Trudy Gravel, Planner Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Gravel: Re:

Application for Minor Variance MV-33-19-S (Chamberlain) Lots 19, 20, Concession 10; 1671 Burnt Hills Road Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Dog Lake

The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance, and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. Summary of the Proposal

The proposal involves the construction of a single story garage on the subject property. requested to: 0

The variance is

Reduce the required setback from the hi ghwater mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.a) of the South FrontenacZoning By-law, to 27 metres in orderto permit the construction of a garage.

Site Description

The property is located on the north shore of Dog Lake. The topography of the property can be described as rising up quickly from the shoreline to the location of the existing dwelling, then continuing to rise slowly in a northly direction until reaching a high ridge of land between the proposed location of the garage and Burnt Hills Road. The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Waterfront Residential’ (RW) in the implementing Zoning By-law.

Wo1’king'1‘ogct1"1e:r in One Ii1’wir0nn1uu J-‘urks(Iur::.1du-Ride-.u1Cum! 613233-7199

Ridcnu'ullc}’(f0rIscrv;1li(n1:\Luhurily I (’.’,-.1u1raqLziRu-giun(‘Im1scr'uLi(:n;\ulh0rily éiI3-(1‘)?.~357]

(313-5-16-4223

Page 75 of 137

Ms. Gravel (MV-33-19-S) October 24, 2019

Discussion

The main interests of the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. ?ooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values of the Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Hazards Natural ‘.‘i.lmH.i|:|.£Dog Lake, maximum recorded water level for Dog Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. For Flooding: The Il?ul-‘GI-I-I J:anr’.“I$‘Ti¥Zf‘IIII£1I£?JJ—u1I-III-JIZFJ-?— J“ Tlllll-’|‘|-‘3’-‘I’ll-NIH-‘=?ood plain. The CRCA’s Guidelines the maximum recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered EEn£n:n.:I:n’&|lwi.:lr-‘dlI?1-1U3IHIJTI|F|:ll’Hl1dT?’|dFl-ll(see description below) requires that all development be Iiil?il?lt?d-:11.ll5I:d’Il5|IJ|5fI|l-I-1’|l’lJ|i|IH’ii’§?’?1ll for Implementing Ontario Regulation 148/06 Based upon elevation iIh!:tn:::u’:::L:I?j’u.E’::Lth:rq:ij’!un.IIIIi:E|lTIwIEI1I1|’. set back a minimum of 6 metres .from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. ‘5-IIII1’H’I|‘I|‘Il‘Il’I’=I’|I=l ri[u’ql.m,&iIpqudtI.‘dam.Em?b.=:dnh&IuTllrnII.ihm’h¢rl?lHE?f?IH mapping data, the proposed development will be located outside of the setback from the regulatory ?ood plain. Erosion: Section 5 .8.2.b) of the Zoning by-law requires that no building or structure or septic tank installation shall be located within 15 metre horizontal of the top of bank of any embankment, the slope of which is greater than 30% from horizontal. CRCA policy de?nes the extent of potential erosion hazards to include an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for bedrock shorelines of l(h):1(v), plus an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. Staff note that the proposed development will be located outside of the erosion hazard allowance as de?ned by the CRCA. Water Quality nu-u1n::IJdta:.=E.;uHmh-5u1hHm::-‘7;-ppEpr.uiu-trlkln-Il?lt Section 5.8.2 (1.) of the Zoning By-Law for South Frontenac Township suggests that a 30 metre setback T’III from the highwater mark is required to be maintained as a buffer in order to protect water quality. The ?’¢[|’.:IqhijnuInnihr:q’:h’l|:nEInj:’:I.l|-lh.&‘h’.n’bhpI:b.1 Of?cial Plan also requires that this buffer area be maintained as a natural Vegetative buffer strip adjacent I:I??.i?Ej?i?!Jr¢g.ir??.E?|I’ErII-hincdmd-Imm1Ju'1t?wb;E:?wl1nI$ to the water’s edge to ?lter pollutants from runoff.

development and site alteration, including tI.:I2ll;.l..|"|.:::’:I.| F’u’.i|1|recommends r:I:I.::::?‘1d that new l|!1’III!’|’¢I|IIIlI?Il’|:i|’-1I|=|‘illhl’l?I’ll.|‘If-5-Hill! CRCA Planning Policy .’|::rJ.:r|1I. Similarly, the septic system tile ?elds and open or enclosed decks/patios attached to the main dwelling, be set back a I.F:qI$‘IH:r??.lda1mImdi&I1’§.hIjIdh|2h¢?I.HITI’¢?.E?‘HtFhh*l H.I.I1I1.’-h’_I1|! L’F.|:’-.|‘I the CRCA EH#‘H’?’§‘i.?IJ’H’i’h!:|[|. highwater mark of a waterbody. However, |:|1|1np1-t|u::|’|:I.|.rE"|I2|‘n.u’-‘lulu minimum distance of 30 metres from the Planning Policy also suggests that new development within the water setback may be considered when there are no reasonable alternatives for locating the development outside of the water setback area, the development is no closer to the water than existing buildings or structures on the property the development complies with the maximum lot coverage provisions of the Zoning By-law, and suitable methods to minimize negative impacts on water quality are incorporated into the development. The site is constrained by the high rocky ridge and the proposed development is being set back as far as T5;iu-g.;¢.[??_m]‘py1uH,p’.I’n?‘5’Mrud?lpuIj’.El%.hbm’db:I.-5[:p¢?IIh¢j?-?:g1.[rhfptIun:f!m’Ith:t:h’?:n’hluith;dur.Id:Im.$. -pp-;i'5|u?-pg; water, the development is further away from the water than the existing development, possible from the n=b'1:I1’.|‘IIl1I-‘bl u-u.-II-I-..-an-u-—’ in the By-law. .’?::I" complies with the maximum lot coverage provisions contained and the proposal nu-r-Jlr-.–illlull-nu-ululunilura-nIH1.IlIII-n1luu’.I Sta? lake the possible. recommend that roofrunoffbe directed away from if ’

Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site Similarly, RWDRT staff strive to preserve and enhance the cultural, natural and scenic values of the national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy this legacy into the future. This can be achieved through the maintenance of a natural shoreline, the maintenance and enhancement

Page 2 of 3

Page 76 of 137

Ms. Gravel (MV-33-19-S) October 24, 2019

of vegetation on the property, development which complements the visual character of the landscape and the maintenance of a minimum 30 metre setback of all development from the water., In this instance, the one-story structure is to be built behind an existing building so the visual character of the landscape will not be impacted and encroachment into the water setback is minimal. I’—-1-——|.j–1–.–.-I-.–rnrnnrrun-—I1-.l-rum-r.-I.-u.u.u.::. Recommendation I.’l|’_lI|I|.|’ ID.‘-11-1|i|-H ‘II-I.-1| staff t:l".‘I.I1II have no I-h-c?-’. to RWDRT the approval an objection of applicationMV-33-19-S h IE: based on our 1 consideration " :?:I’nI.IIJ-aluqglh?m for natural hazards, natural and cultural heritage, and water quality and quantity protection policies.

Regulatory Reguirements Parks Canada Rideau Canal Of?ce oversees all in-water and shoreline works along the Canal system. If the landowner wishes to carry out any in-water or shoreline works in the future, the Rideau Canal Of?ce must be contacted and written approval obtained prior to the commencement of construction.

Please also note that a portion of the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by &|:’-Ji’E.’|. the The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e. g. development and site CRCA. TI:IpI11I:LI!’lhrn[|.I.:hnuLu2:uE?.‘p’npj:&’.pILu,}?n’%.u:nl.ih alteration) a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as ?ooding and erosion, and that the to ?Jd:u]hlp:IuuE1nrm1?‘Ed.d.h3n?:dh:_’:h.n:h-Thntmlm£unnu._ud?n1u changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. ‘|i|u’:|’.Ir.I’III-.IJulI.1|.II|.|II.I|1n.?;. Within a regulated area, written :l|:I.—.?n-?.‘p:l-uIE|l’|:I’qIl’hI.:gj’T?fru1tI-l|‘I::::|uI. permission must be obtained from the CRCA prior to development taking place. A CRCA permit will ‘|n’n—n1:n:tIrI’:n’Id!Tmd'1FHf.?[r|HudunI?i;.;I1.—1Ju1I,g?.|? .||_I:’.];IE:.||_p§=i|.I-|I

—I’-II’I” ‘II11-11 -II I J— -I I F be required proposed the as development is within 15 metres of the top of valley for Dog Lake. 1

j—I

I-I

—

IIII

Please inform this of?ce of any decision made by the Committee with regard to this application. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 244, or by email at aschmidt@crca.ca Yours truly,

Andrew Schmidt Supervisor, Development Review /as c.c.

Lee Chamberlain, applicant (via email) Tom Green, Parks Canada (Via email) Michelle Hannah, South Frontenac Township (via email)

PagePage 3 of 3 77 of 137

Page 78 of 137

..o:=._c8:

o«:m2 E2 o:.

Page 79 of 137

.m;» .O\

o=___o?

we.ocm

mwoom 2

oEmz

o mmo w£ wooo .w

\ «xx

..N..w mo. of. N

Ex 9:.

o och

“Soon.

m?co?

mEo_._ 9:.

Page 80 of 137

Page 81 of 137

on.

C ”wm:.Oz

_%_m E :9…

xom?wm

w:wE_n_

8.3

o:m

_mp:O

28__:__

z: .0 33¢

__:m .6 £92..

xom?ww

8.. %_m

xom?ww

3.. .mwm

.. E2".

xomnuww

—

.m.m:

u_mw. w ho 25

:m 05 u_._ .m..r

%w////

Page 82 of 137

Page 83 of 137

Page 84 of 137

Page 85 of 137

Page 86 of 137

Page 87 of 137

Lake view Dr

Inset Map

ul Dr l e n

CAIRD MV-34-19-P

to n Dr

Ca rl e

Roa d 38

Vero na

Salmo n

6097 CARLETON DR

Ve ro na La ke

Wat er St

Legend Caird Property Parcel Fabric Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

Ve ro na La ke

Waterbody River/ Stream

Roads

Arterial Expressway / Highway

Ca r le

ton D

Local / Street Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

Page 88 of 137

Scale 1:500

Meters UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – VARIANCE APPLICATION Report Date:

November 8, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-34-19-P Dale & Florence Caird Part Lot 9, Concession 11, being Part 5 on Plan 13R3431, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 6097 Carleton Drive, Verona Lake Purpose of Application: To vary Sections 5.6.2.2, 5.8.2a, 5.10.2, 5.24.2 & 14.3.1 of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and that the Committee of Adjustment defer making a decision on application MV-34-19-P to allow staff and agencies additional time to undertake a site inspection and work with the applicants to modify the submitted plans.

Proposal An application for minor variance has been submitted for the property located at Part Lot 9, Concession 11, being Part 5 on Plan 13R3431, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 6097, Verona Lake (see attached map) to permit the relocation of an existing one storey cottage consisting of 768 ft2 in the dimensions of 32 feet by 24 feet (to be reduced to 30 feet) to the north of the current location to be 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) from the interior lot line. The cottage will be raised 2.5 feet higher than its current elevation. The existing setback of the cottage, being 32 feet to the high water mark of Verona Lake, will be maintained for the new cottage. The construction of the new cottage at 32 feet from Verona Lake requires relief under the UR1 Zone and will require relief from the UR1 Zone. The requested modifications to the existing cottage will change the legal non-complying status of the cottage. The applicants are also requesting to construct a deck 8 feet deep, in the dimensions of 15 feet at the south side of the cottage and 22 feet at the south and east sides of the cottage, proposed to be setback 24 feet from the highwater mark of the lake. The proposed construction also includes a proposed veranda at the front of the dwelling extending 8 feet towards the front yard. As per the Urban Residential – First Density (UR1) Zone, the interior side yard is required to be 2.5 metres (8.2 ft.) and the applicants will be required to amend their plans and application to either comply with the required interior setback or will require relief. The existing garden shed is proposed to be removed to accommodate for the relocation of the cottage and will remain outside the existing tile bed and septic tank at the west side of the dwelling. The applicants are also proposing to construct a garage 15 feet by 22 feet setback 3 feet from the front property line adjacent to Carleton Drive. Public Services have indicated that the garage should be setback a minimum of 10 feet from Carleton Drive and that the existing driveway is required to be used for access as a second driveway entrance shall not be permitted. The property is located on the western shore of Verona Lake. The topography of the property is relatively level at the street with a gradual slope to the cottage and dropping off towards the lake. The property shares a paved driveway with the property to the south. Township staff are requesting to defer the minor variance application. Quinte Conservation Authority have provided comments, but have not undertaken a site inspection of the property. The deferral request is to allow Quinte Conservation staff time to survey the 1:100 year flood plain on the subject property. The deferral will provide additional time for planning staff to work with the applicants to modify their plans based on the preliminary review of the application. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: November 1, 2019 Page 89 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Attachments: Map of Caird property

Page 90 of 137

Q U I NT E C O NS ER V AT I O N - P L AN N I NG A C T R EV I EW QC File No. PL0255-2019 Municipality:

South Frontenac

Owner

Dale Caird

Location:

6097 Carleton Drive

Roll #:

10290800901070000000

Application Description:

Minor Variance File No. MV-34-19-P

Feature:

Verona Lake

Lot 9, Concession 11

Portland

Seeking relief to rebuild cottage, proposed garage and to allow for open decks

The subject lands lie within the regulated area of Verona Lake (by virtue of Ontario Regulation #319/09 – Regulation of Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses). Please note that the owners will need to apply to the Conservation Authority for a permit prior to development (construction / filling/ excavation/ site grading) within 30 metres of the 1:100 year floodplain of Verona Lake. Quinte Conservation staff have not been to the subject property and have not surveyed the 1:100 year flood plain. Staff would not have any concerns with moving the dwelling and the proposed garage as long as the proposed development does not encroach any closer to the 1:100 year flood plain. Further, our staff would not have any concerns with the proposed open decks as long as the decks are not within the 1:100 year flood plain. Drawings will have to be provided at the permitting stage.

Page 1 of 2

Page 91 of 137

Quinte Region Source Protection Plan Quinte Conservation provides Risk Management services as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006 on behalf of member municipalities. Part of this is reviewing building and planning applications to ensure no new significant drinking water threats as outlined in the Quinte Region Source Protection Plan are created. Policies for significant threats in the Quinte Region Source Protection Plan are not applicable as the subject property lies outside of an intake protection zone or wellhead protection area for a municipal drinking water system. As such no Section 59 Clearance Notice is required. Planning Act - Natural Heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement Section 2.1 of the Natural Heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement protects features including (but not limited to); Provincially Significant Wetlands, significant woodlands and significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest. The subject lands do not lie within a Provincially Significant Wetland, or within an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest. Further, an Environmental Impact Study was not provided with the current planning application, and we will not be requesting one. Staff are satisfied that the application as presented is consistent with the natural heritage policies of the Provincial Policy Statement. The proponent may wish to contact the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry for further information. Final Comments:

Quinte Conservation has no objection to the application as presented.

10/31/2019 Date

Christine Jennings Planning and Regulations Technician And:

Sharlene Richardson Regulations Officer

Page 2 of 2

Page 92 of 137

Report from Roads to Committee of Adjustment MV-34-19-P Application Number: ___________________________________________________

Dale & Florence Caird Applicant’s Name: _____________________________________________________

11 9 Portland Concession: _________________ Lot: _______________District:

6097 Carleton Drive Road: ________________________________________________________________ Road Maintenance:

✔ Year-round □

Seasonal □

Sight Lines: Are there adequate sight lines for the proposed placement of the garage?

Yes □

✔ No □

If no, what changes would be required to improve sight lines? The proposed location of the garage will obstruct the sightlines to the north for both the applicants property and the neighboring property that is joined. Public Services recommends moving garage back from the property line to a distance of 10 feet minimum.

Approved by the Public Services? ✔ Yes □ Yes, with conditions □ No □ If yes, with conditions, please describe conditions below.

The garage needs to be set back to a minimum 10’ off the property line. A second entrance will not be allowed.

Signature on behalf of Public Services

November 5, 2019

Date

Page 93 of 137

Page 94 of 137

E;»

.: ECG

.._.m

=___o£

woom

mEmz

a mo _E 300

.©

a:9:.

®c._u

Same

?coi

9:. E:oc

Page 95 of 137

mowommu

x.20

Page 96 of 137

Page 97 of 137

G20

. /,wx..\

Page 98 of 137

.24

Page 99 of 137

Page 100 of 137

Page 101 of 137

We _Mercator_Auxi|Iary_Sphere

R l_|

FRONTENAC

WGS_1984

0.1

Page 102 of 137 I

003

RLI

041 Kilometers

H Ll

1: 1,128

Rl_|

Th 5 map IS a user generated statrc output from an nternet mappmg site and IS for eference only Data ayers that appear Ont s map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwIsereliable THIS MAP IS NOT TO B USED FOR NAVIGATION

[-’'|_I

RLI

Ill’l’l"’

_‘y’

F c-he .-. J, [r-I y‘

Notes

All

F-14

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATE zONE ((

PUBLICZONE (0:

URBAN MULTIPLE RESIDENTIA L

URBAN INDUSTRIALZONE (UI)

URBAN COMMERCIAL ZONE (UC

TUZ

SALVAGE YARD INDUSTRIAL ZO

WATERFRONT RESIDENTIALZO

RURAL ZONE (RU)

RECREATIONAL RESORT COMM

LIMITEDSERVICE RESIDENTIA (RLSW) L

LIMITEDSERVICE RESIDENTIAL

RURAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE (RI)

RURAL COMMERCIAL zONE (RC

RESIDENTIALZONE (R)

QUARRY ‘3’ ZONE (QB)

QUARRY ‘A’ ZONE (QA)

PIT ‘B’ZONE (PB)

PIT ’A’ ZONE (PA)

OPEN SPACE

MOBILE HOMERESIDENTIALzo

ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION

COMMUNITYFACILITY ZONE (OF

AGRICULTURALZONE (A)

SF Zoning Updates 2019

Legend

8|‘?’_‘I>

T-.-Il.ll[u

C‘:ucm .:

Page 103 of 137

d Secon Rd Lake

Inset Map

GEE MV-35-19-P

Fir st La ke

ard Ln

Depot Creek

4732 SNIDER RD

Black Lake

Legend

First Depot Lake

Reyn

olds R

Snide rR

Arena Bdry Rd

Gee Property Parcel Fabric Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland Waterbody River/ Stream

Roads

Arterial Expressway / Highway Local / Street

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Page 104 of 137

Sn id

Scale 1:2,000 0 5 10

Meters UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR VARIANCE – PLANNING REPORT Report Date:

November 11, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-35-19-P Brooks & Michelle Gee Part Lot 16, Concession 14, being Part 2 on Plan 13R8370, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4732 Snider Road Purpose of Application: To vary Section 5.24.2 & Section 7.3.2 of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional approval be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:

 zoning relief for construction of a new structure zoning relief for replacement to an existing structure zoning relief for other

Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Rural (RU) Zone

Zoning Relief Requested:

Section 5.24.2: Accessory Buildings for an accessory structure being a detached

Relief: Permit a garage in the front yard

garage located in the front yard Section 7.3.2: Minimum Front Yard setback requirement of 20 metres (65.6 ft)

Relief: Permit a garage in the front yard, setback 19.2 metres (63 ft) in the front yard.

Proposal An application for minor variance has been submitted to permit the construction of a one storey Garage, 6 metres in height, in the front yard consisting of 1200 ft2 to be constructed 19.2 metres from the front yard. The property contains an existing dwelling with attached garage and sheds located along the rear of the property line at Part Lot 14, Concession 16, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4732 Snider Road (see attached map). The property is located on the west side of Snider Road, located south of Arena Boundary Road. The Page 105 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT topography of the property is described as sloping towards the southwest corner of the site. The proposed garage will be constructed on an existing granular surface and will replace a shed at this location. The shed is presently closer to the front yard than where the proposed garage is to be constructed. Staff are requesting that the garage comply with the required minimum front yard setback of 20 metres (65.6 ft.) as per the Rural (RU) Zone as the front yard setback can be met as the detached garage can be accommodated on the existing granular surface. It is understood that the garage will be constructed in the front yard which requires relief to the by-law. Under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act there are four tests a minor variance must meet. A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests: • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? • Is the application desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question? • Is the application minor?

Background The subject property is a rural residential lot with 256 feet (78 metres) of frontage along Snider Road and consists of 1.4 acres (0.56 ha) in area. The property is located in an area of existing residential homes. As the property slopes towards the southwest, which is low lying, the proposed location is a suitable location. This area has an existing granular base to support the proposed garage. The current owners purchased the property in 1999. The dwelling was constructed in approximately 1994 and the sheds were constructed after that date. The property has an existing septic system located to the rear of the house. The well is located to the north of the home. There are existing residential dwellings surrounding the subject property.

Planning Analysis Agency Analysis and Comments Public Services – Comments are not required. KFL&A Public Health – The application was not circulated to the Health Unit as the septic system is located northwest of the proposed garage to the rear of the existing dwelling. Quinte Conservation – The application was not circulated to Quinte Conservation given the lands are zoned Rural and are not adjacent to a body of water and do not have any wetlands identified on site. Public Comments – At the time of the writing of this report, no comments have been received from the public.

Conclusion The proposed application to permit the construction of a one storey garage, 6 metres in height, consisting of 1200 ft2 to be constructed 20 metres from the front yard setback from Snider Road located at Part Lot 16, Concession 14, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4732 Snider Road, meets the four tests for a minor variance: • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan as the proposed garage will be constructed to the southeast of the existing single detached dwelling located on the rural property. The garage will be located in the front yard setback and away from the low area at the southwest corner of the property. • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw. The proposed garage complies with the zoning provisions in the Zoning By-law for the Rural Zone with the exception the garage located in the front yard. Staff recommend that the applicant comply with the required setback front yard setback of 20 metres. Page 106 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT

• The variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question as the garage is away from the low lying area at the southwest corner of the property and will be buffered by existing trees in the front yard, located on an area that contains an existing granular surface. • The variance is minor as the proposed garage will be setback from the existing dwelling and septic system. The proposed addition does not exceed lot coverage and maximum permitted height of 6 metres.

Recommended Conditions Conditions are a decision of the Committee of Adjustment, the conditions below are recommended. The final approved conditions will be included in the signed decision

The Minor variance is for the construction of a one storey garage consisting of 1200m2 to be constructed to the southeast of the existing single detached dwelling, as per the drawings submitted with MV-35-19-P. The garage will be 20 metres from the front yard setback in the Rural (RU) Zone.
The applicant is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the requirements of the Township.
A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
Minor variance MV-35-19-P is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: November 1, 2019 Attachments: Map of the Gee property

Page 107 of 137

“5_W.u;

Page 108 of 137

Page 109 of 137

Page 110 of 137

Qz:..,.m

Page 111 of 137

._W.w.m%mm…Em.V,

rm.:.

Page 112 of 137

Page 113 of 137

Page 114 of 137

o<mSn¢ <¢3mo

o..¢m

9.3%

o:_.«o::<

5::

uu3x P3

ms: Umoux ~82

zoqmw

n.8.x. u.8.. n

«E¢

Page 115 of 137

Inset Map Bedford Rd

Alton Rd Ea st

Deer y a un W R Run W a y r e De

x Fo

e dg Ri

PECK & BAXTER MV-36-19-L 4586 FOX RIDGE TRAIL

Sydenham Lake

Legend Peck & Baxter Property Parcel Fabric Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

i dg xR

Waterbody

River/ Stream

Roads

Arterial Expressway / Highway Local / Street

Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.

Page 116 of 137

Sydenham Lake

Scale 1:1,600 04.25 8.5

17 25.5 34 Meters

UTM Projection NAD 83

Report from Roads to Committee of Adjustment MV-36-19-L Application Number: ___________________________________________________

Jeff Peck & Stephanie Baxter Applicant’s Name: _____________________________________________________ Parts 22-24 Plan 13R14914 Lot 5 on Pl 1986 Loughborough Concession: _________________ Lot: _______________District:

Fox Ridge Trail Road: ________________________________________________________________ Road Maintenance:

✔ Year-round □

Seasonal □

Sight Lines: Are there adequate sight lines for the proposed placement of the garage?

✔ Yes □

No □

If no, what changes would be required to improve sight lines?

Approved by the Public Services? ✔ Yes □ Yes, with conditions □ No □ If yes, with conditions, please describe conditions below.

Public Services will not allow a second entrance to the property to the garage. It will have to be serviced from the existing entrance.

Signature on behalf of Public Services

November 07, 2019

Date

Page 117 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR VARIANCE – PLANNING REPORT Report Date:

November 14, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-36-19-L Jeff Peck & Stephanie Baxter Lot 5, Plan 1986 being Parts 22-24 on Plan 13R14914, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4586 Fox Ridge Trail, Sydenham Lake Purpose of Application: To vary Section 5.24.2 of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019 Recommendation: That provisional approval be: 

granted with conditions (attached) deferred denied

Purpose:

 zoning relief for construction of a new structure zoning relief for replacement to an existing structure zoning relief for other

Official Plan Designation: Rural Zoning: Residential (R) Zone & Open Space – Public (OS-1) Zone

Zoning Relief Requested:

Section 5.24.2: Accessory Buildings for an accessory structure being a garage located in the front yard

Relief: Permit a garage in the front yard, setback 20 metres in the front yard.

Proposal An application for minor variance has been submitted to permit the construction of a one storey garage in the front yard consisting of 1400 ft2 to be constructed approximately 100 feet from the road Fox Ridge Trail, and approximately 400 feet from Sydenham Lake. The applicants have indicated that the height of the garage will comply with the maximum permitted height of 6 metres for an accessory building and will comply with the maximum permitted lot coverage. The property contains an existing two storey residential dwelling with attached garage situated to the rear of the lands, located on Lot 5, Plan 1986 being Parts 22-24 on Plan 13R14914, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4586 Fox Ridge Trail, Sydenham Lake.

Page 118 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT The property is located on the north shore of Sydenham Lake. The topography of the property is described as sloping gradually from the street towards the dwelling and dropping off towards Sydenham Lake. The property has mature trees between the road and the existing house or front yard which will partially buffer the proposed garage in a slightly depressed portion of the site, and towards the rear of the existing dwelling towards the waterfront. The applicants have indicated that additional landscaping will be provided in the front yard to provide additional buffering of the garage. Under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act there are four tests a minor variance must meet. A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests: • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? • Does the application conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? • Is the application desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question? • Is the application minor?

Background The subject property is a waterfront lot with 215 feet (65.53 metres) of waterfrontage along Sydenham Lake and approximately 195 feet along Fox Ridge Trail and consists of 1.97 acres (0.79 ha) in area. The property is located on the south side of Fox Ridge Trail. The applicants have indicated that their current attached garage is 400 ft2 and cannot accommodate for the storage of boats, lawnmower and summer and winter items. The garage would be located away from the existing dwelling, septic system and well in a partially depressed area with partial vegetative cover. The applicant has indicated that they will be installing additional landscaping at the front of the garage so as to screen the structure from the neighbours view across the street. The garage will be accessed from the existing driveway. The current owners purchased the property in 2013. The dwelling was constructed in approximately 2000. The property has an existing septic system between the existing dwelling and the street and the well is located adjacent to the house. The applicant has indicated that services will be extended to the garage and may contain plumbing fixtures. The applicants will be working with the Health Unit to assess whether the existing septic system can accommodate for additional plumbing. The property has a number of existing trees and a dock along the shore of the waterfront. The surrounding area contains existing year round dwellings located along the shoreline of Sydenham Lake in proximity to this site. The owners have noted that the neighbour to the north will be most directly impacted, but with the additional tree planting undertaken the visual impact will be minimized.

Planning Analysis Agency Analysis and Comments Public Services – Public Services will not permit a second entrance for this property to provide access to the garage. The garage will be required to be accessed from the existing entrance. KFL&A Public Health – Staff at the Health Unit indicated in their November 14, 2019 comments that they have no objection to the proposed minor variance and that the location of the garage will not impact the existing on-site sewage system (permit # LO-4-99). The applicants will be required to complete an Application for Review of Performance Level of Existing On-Site Sewage System through KFL&A Public Health, in advance of applying for a building permit through the Township. KFL&A will work with the applicants to ensure that the access to the garage does not impact the existing on-site sewage system. No additional charge is required from the applicants as the fee has been paid with the minor variance application. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority – CRCA staff have concluded that they are not required to review the application for minor variance as there appears to be no natural hazard or natural heritage features in proximity to the proposed location for the garage. Page 119 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Public Comments – At the time of the writing of this report, no comments have been received from the public.

Conclusion The proposed application to permit the construction of a one storey garage consisting of 1400 ft2, to comply with the maximum permitted height of 6 metres and to be constructed approximately 100 feet from Fox Ridge Trail to the northeast of the existing dwelling located at Lot 5, Plan 1986 being Parts 22-24 on Plan 13R14914, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, 4586 Fox Ridge Trail, Sydenham Lake, meets the four tests for a minor variance: • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan as the proposed garage will be constructed to the northeast of the existing single detached dwelling located on the rural waterfront property. The garage will be located as far back as possible from the waterfront given the constraints on the lot. • The variance conforms to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Bylaw as the structure will be constructed outside the 30 metre setback to the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake. As the property has frontage on a maintained street, the rear of the lands along Sydenham Lake is determined to be the rear yard as per Section 5.25 of the zoning by-law. The proposed development will not impact the (IPZ-1) Zone given the garage located in the front yard. • The variance is desirable for the appropriate development of the lands in question as development is further from the waterfront than existing buildings on the property. The proposed garage will be constructed in a depressed area and is partially screened by existing trees. By condition, additional landscaping will be provided to screen the proposed garage from the street and the neighbour’s view of the subject property. • The variance is minor as the proposal seeks to maintain the waterbody setback and direct the garage away from Sydenham Lake. The proposed garage does not exceed lot coverage and will comply with the maximum permitted height of 6 metres.

Recommended Conditions Conditions are a decision of the Committee of Adjustment, the conditions below are recommended. The final approved conditions will be included in the signed decision

The Minor variance is for the construction of a one storey garage consisting of 130m2 (1400 ft2) to be constructed to the northeast of the existing single detached dwelling, as per the drawings submitted with MV-36-19-L. The garage will be approximately 400 feet to the highwater mark of Sydenham Lake and approximately 100 feet from the front lot line in the Residential (R) Zone.
The applicant is required to enter into a Development Agreement to be registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township to address the matters and requirements of the Township:  

The Owner shall provide additional landscaping to ensure that the garage is visually screened from the road. The access to and placement of the garage shall not impact the existing on-site sewage system.

A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without the approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
The applicants will be required to complete an Application for Review of Performance Level of Existing On-Site Sewage System through KFL&A Public Health, in advance of applying for

Page 120 of 137

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT a building permit through the Township. The applicants are required to work with KFL&A to ensure that the access to the garage does not impact the existing on-site sewage system. 5. The design of the garage shall be in general conformity with the illustrated elevation plan submitted in support of application MV-36-19-L, attached to the Decision as Schedule “A”. 6. Minor variance MV-36-19-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: November 1, 2019 Attachments: Map of the Peck & Baxter property

Page 121 of 137

Em:

F .w1.x

»a:% m .s»..NW

m.8:Em8:

2 mmm

ssmq

Page 122 of 137

Page 123 of 137

wiumovo mo

mx..m-_?2.,.m

m_>zom

Page 124 of 137

SE.

. Q.

Page 125 of 137

mmm

_Om

Em .40:

Page 126 of 137

Page 127 of 137

SURVEYING

I N C.

Page 128 of 137

Page 129 of 137

Inset Map Bobs Lake und

en Gre Rd Ba y

st Ea Ln re o Sh

w bo in

et n s s Ln u S re o Sh

Round Island Ln

Ro d Ln n sla

e ris un

Bobs Lake

POTVIN MV-37-19-B

Ba y S hore Ln Bobs Lake

21A BAYSHORE LANE

Bobs Lake Bobs Lake

Legend Potvin Property Parcel Fabric

Bobs Lake

Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland Waterbody

River/ Stream

et ns u S

Roads

Arterial Expressway / Highway Local / Street

Page 130 of 137

Scale 1:1,900 0 5 10

Bay S h ore Ln

Meters UTM Projection NAD 83

REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING REPORT – VARIANCE APPLICATION Report Date:

November 8, 2019

Application No: Owner: Location of Property:

MV-37-19-B Anna Potvin Part Lot 18, Concession 4, being Parts 2-4 on Plan 13R4656, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 21A Bayshore Lane, Bobs Lake. Purpose of Application: To vary Sections 5.8.2a), 5.10.2, & 10.3.1 of the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw Date of Hearing: November 14, 2019

Recommendation It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment receive comments from the public and that the Committee of Adjustment defer making a decision on application MV-37-19-B to provide the applicant with additional time to work with the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority to modify the submitted application and plans.

Proposal An application for minor variance has been submitted for the property located at Part Lot 18, Concession 4, being Parts 2-4 on Plan 13R4656, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 21A Bayshore Lane, Bobs Lake. (see attached map) to permit the reconstruction of a one storey seasonal dwelling and deck. The applicant is seeking relief from Sections 5.8.2a), 5.10.2, & 10.3.1 from the Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) Zone and Flooding and Shoreline Erosion Hazards which both require a 30 metre (98.4 feet) setback from the highwater mark and Section 5.10.2 which does not permit enlargement of gross floor area, increase in height and does not allow living space to be added below grade for existing buildings within 30 metres (98.4 feet) of a Waterbody or Watercourse. The applicant had noted that the original cottage was destroyed by fire in the fall of 2017. The size of the four season cottage was originally 7.6m (25 ft) wide by 11m (36 ft) deep with a loft and a roughedin basement with two washrooms. The existing deck towards the waterfront remains on site. Based on a letter from the applicant, the applicant is proposing to rotate the cottage to reconstruct a new deck towards the waterfront. The property is located on the western shore of Bobs Lake in Green Bay. The topography of the property is rocky and wooded to the west of where the original cottage was located and then slopes towards the waterfront. Rideau Valley Conservation Authority provided comments dated November 7, 2019 indicating that they object to the requested reduction in the setback to 28.4 metres for the cottage and 25.9 metres for the deck. RVCA are receptive to having the reconstructed deck encroach into the 30 metre seback, but not the cottage. Based on the comments from RVCA, the deferral request will provide additional time for the applicant to work with RVCA staff to modify their plans. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: November 1, 2019 Attachments: Map of Potvin property

Page 131 of 137

.9.

Environmental Health Department 1130 Elizabeth Street Sharbot Lake, Ontario KOH2P0 (613) 279-2151

KFL&A

Public Health REQUESTSFOR COMMENTS

1-800-267-7875 Fax: (613) 279-3997

http://www.kf|apub|ichea|th.ca

To:

Ms. Michelle Hannah

Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON KOH 2T0

Application Number:

MV—37-19B

Type of Application or Proposal:

Minor Variance

Applicant Name(s):

Potvin.Anna

Locatlom

Planning Department or Agency:

Comments:

Lot 18. Concession 4, 13R4565 Pts. 2,3,4; Bedford District 21A Bayshore Lane

Township of South Frontenac (Bedford)

KFL&APublic Health has no objections to the proposed minor variance to rebuild cottage. Owner has submitted an application under permit number BE-23-19.

Inspector:

Date:

October 31, 2019

PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLICHEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&A Public Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1-800-267-7875.

Page 132 of 137

November 7, 2019 19-SFR-MVA-0028 (BEDFORD)

Township of South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment P.O. Box 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 Attention:

Michelle Hannah

Subject:

POTVIN, Anna; Application M-37-19-B – 21A Bayshore Lane, Part Lot 18, Concession 4; Former Township of Bedford, Now the Township of South Frontenac; Roll Number: 1029020020435020000 ——————————————————————————————————————————Dear Ms. Hannah, The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) has reviewed the subject application within the context of:

Section 2.1 Natural Heritage, 2.2 Water and 3.1 Natural Hazards of the Provincial Policy Statement under Section 3 of the Planning Act; The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (“Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourses” regulation 174/06 under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act); The Bobs Lake – Crow Lake Catchment Report; The Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Plan; The Rideau Lakes Study

The Proposal The RVCA understands this proposal to be an application for a minor variance to seek relief from Sections 5.8.2a and 10.3.1 of the Township of South Frontenac’s Zoning By-law. The requested variance would permit a reduction of the required 30 metre setback to 25.9 metres from the normal high water mark of Bob’s Lake. The variance also proposes to vary section 5.10.2 to allow enlargement of gross floor space and an increase in height within 30 metres of a waterbody.

Page 133 of 137

No structures are proposed to be reconstructed closer to the water than currently exists. The Property The subject property is indicated as being approximately 1 hectare in area with road frontage of approximately 80 metres on Bayshore Lane and water frontage of approximately 60 metres adjacent Bobs Lake. It has an average depth of 143 metres. A review of our records did not indicate the presence of any wetlands, organic soils or unstable slopes. Steep slopes were observed during the site visit to the property. Our office does have a regulated flood level of 163.07 metres above sea level (geodetic) associated with Bobs Lake which should be considered in any future reconstruction. Review Comments Provincial Policy Statement Our office does not have any concerns in respect of Section 2.1, natural heritage, associated with this development. Section 2.2 of the PPS requires planning authorities to protect, improve or restore the quality and quantity of water by using the watershed as the ecologically meaningful scale for integrated and long-term planning (which can be a foundation for considering cumulative impacts of development). The planner is of the opinion that as long-term planning can consider cumulative impacts, where there is the ability to improve non-complying setbacks these should be undertaken, especially when development proposes to increase gross floor area. Based on this section of the PPS and the additional requirement to ensure that stormwater management practices minimize stormwater volume, contaminant loads and maintain or increase the extent of pervious and vegetative surfaces, our office would advocate for an improved setback where there is an increase in gross floor area. Regarding Section 3.0 of the PPS, as long as redevelopment is mindful of the regulated flood level, our office has no concerns associated with this section. Ontario Regulation 174/06 The applicants should be aware that Bobs Lake (Green Bay) is regulated as a watercourse under Ontario Regulation 174/06. As such, should any modifications to the shoreline be proposed, prior written permission is required in accordance with our regulation (Development, Interference with Wetlands, Alterations to Shoreline and Watercourses) made under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. Bobs Lake Catchment Report – Green Bay The water quality report for Green Bay is “good” according to the Bobs Lake Catchment Report. Nutrient concentrations are generally below the Provincial Water Quality Objectives (PWQO) with few exceedances. It is possible that occasional problems with nutrient enrichment may be observed in shallow, sheltered bays or following periods of heavy runoff. Bacterial contamination is not currently a significant concern in Green Bay. Efforts such as the diversion of runoff and enhanced shoreline buffers are important to continue to protect and enhance water Page 2 of 5

Page 134 of 137

quality and reduce future nutrient increases. This is particularly important for roadways and dwellings that border the lake. Residents can help minimize their impact on the lake by reducing nutrient inputs through practices such as proper septic maintenance, keeping shorelines natural and using phosphate free soaps and detergents. The report recommends that a minimum 30 metre development setback be applied consistently for water quality and shoreline protection adjacent the lake. Source Water Protection The subject property is identified as overlying a highly vulnerable aquifer. These are aquifers that are vulnerable to surface contaminants due to thin or absent soils overlying bedrock that may be fractured. Where these conditions exist, it may be possible for contaminants to enter drinking ground water supplies. For this reason, care should be taken to avoid land uses and practices that may inadvertently lead to undesirable effects on groundwater. Discuss and Recommendations The Township’s Official Plan states one of its goals is to preserve and enhance environmental quality for the enjoyment of future generations while realizing its economic potential (Section 4.1). In order to accomplish this, the Plan recognizes that development decisions will be made from a long term cumulative impact point of view to ensure no net loss of environmental quality occurs, to maintain or improve surface and subsurface water quality and to encourage reestablishment of natural vegetation along shorelines (4.1[a][iv][v][vi]). The Township considers all lands within 90 metres of the highwater mark of lakes and rivers to be “Environmentally Sensitive Areas” (5.2.7[b]). In addition, Green Bay is also considered to be a “Highly Sensitive Lake Trout Lake” (5.2.8) and it is indicated that the policies of 5.2.7[b][i] will apply to existing and new development and/or site alterations located adjacent to such lakes (5.2.8). The intent of the Plan is that all buildings and structures not related to the use of water, and all sewage disposal system leaching beds be well setback from the water. More specifically, a minimum setback of 30 metres shall apply. Based on the site visit completed to the subject property, RVCA staff are aware of the limitations which currently exist with the subject property, namely being the large slope to the rear of the existing cottage. During conversations with the applicant, our office had recommended maintaining the existing setback and possibly improving it somewhat while acknowledging the slope to the rear of the cottage. It is important to note that the planner took rough measurements in the field on September 4, 2019. An existing setback of 23.77 metres was recorded. The planner recommended that an improvement occur but did not think it was feasible to achieve 30 metres. With the provision of a survey completed by qualified surveyors, the actual measurements indicate that the existing deck is 25.9 metres and the setback to the cottage is 28.4 metres. There are two observations about this survey. The first is that if the recommended improvement in setback, as discussed during the site visit, was implemented the cottage would entirely meet the 30 metre setback except for the projection of the deck into the 30 metre setback. The second is that the survey provided indicates that the applicants have decided not to pursue an improvement in setback. If the northwest corner of the existing cottage is used as the same location for the proposed reconstructed cottage, construction of the habitable space would meet the 30 metre setback from the proposed highwater mark. The deck would still project into the 30 metre setback by Page 3 of 5

Page 135 of 137

approximately 3.5 metres, but there is no proposed enlargement to the deck structure as a result of this application. It is the opinion of the planner that efforts to improve the setback should be explored based on the intent of the Township’s Official Plan, the catchment report and the PPS. This interpretation relies on the fact that increases in gross floor area are occurring. Because no increase in deck gross floor area is proposed as a result of the development application, our office is of the opinion that the existing deck encroachment is permitted, although we still recommend attempting to achieve a greater setback from the deck. Therefore, our office recommends that any proposed reduction in the 30 metre setback be only for the deck projection and that the Committee require the cottage, with its increased gross floor area, to meet the 30 metre setback. We must object to the requested reduction in setback to 28.4 metres for the cottage and 25.9 metres to the deck. If the Committee and applicant are open to having the reconstructed cottage meet the 30 metre setback, and having only the deck project into the required 30 metre setback, our office would be able to offer support for that scenario and would have the following conditions:

Sediment and erosion controls between the construction area and Bobs Lake are to be installed prior to initiation of the work, to remain in place until the site has been allowed to regenerate and vegetation has been re-established to the satisfaction of the Township or Chief Building Official.

All materials from construction (such as demolished materials or excess soil) will be disposed of 30 metres or more from the normal highwater mark of Bobs Lake at a proper disposal site.

A planting plan showing the current on-site vegetation shall be prepared and submitted as part of any implementing agreement. This will be to the satisfaction of the Township. This should take the form of a drawing showing the current vegetation with a commitment to its maintenance. The applicants can consult with RVCA staff regarding this recommended condition.

Roof runoff should be directed to the rear or side yards and to an area of soil depth or containment adequate to allow for absorption, infiltration and treatment. Collection and management of runoff in this manner helps to control untreated surface water from running overland to Bobs Lake. This assists with preventing nutrients and sediment from reaching these features.

The following statement should be included in any agreement, should one be required as a result of this development: “Should any work be undertaken along the shoreline of Bobs Lake permits would be required by the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority in accordance with Ontario Regulation 174/06 (“Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourses”).”

Page 4 of 5

Page 136 of 137

“It is recommended that the underside of habitable floor space of the cottage be at least 0.3 metres above the regulatory flood level of 163.07 metres above sea level (geodetic). It is also recommended that all mechanical, electrical or heating and cooling units or ductwork be located above the regulatory flood level.” Conclusions In conclusion, The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority recommends that the reconstructed cottage meet the required 30 metre setback as much as possible while still allowing for a deck projection. Our office remains open to ongoing discussions regarding this development application and are of the opinion that a development can be proposed which meets the intent of the Township’s Official Plan, the catchment report and the PPS. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (613) 267-5353 x 131 should you have any questions. Please advise us on the Committee’s decision respecting this application or any changes in the status of the application. Yours truly,

Phil Mosher Planner RPP cc – Ms. Potvin, owner cc – KFLPHA

Page 5 of 5

Page 137 of 137

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.