Body: Committee of Adjustment Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee Date: September 14, 2017 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of Adjustment/2017/Committee Of Adjustment - 14 Sep 2017 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:
7:00 PM, Thursday, September 14, 2017 Council Chambers.
Call to Order
a)
Resolution
Adoption of Agenda
Declaration of pecuniary interest
Approval of Minutes – [August 13, 2017]
a)
Resolution
Minor Variance Applications from Previous Meetings
a)
MV-43-16-S - Ronald Hackett - Concession 1, Part Lot 11, Sandpiper Lane, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction of an addition to an existing dwelling within the 30m setback from water
New Consent Applications:
a)
S-41-17-B - James Campbell - Concession 5, Part Lot 6, Copper Head Lane/James Wilson Road, District of Bedford - Consent to create a lot addition
14 - 16
b)
S-42-17-B- Stephen Morris - Concession 3, Part Lot 7, McNichols Lane, District of Bedford - Consent to create a lot addition
17 - 19
c)
S-43-17-S - Joseph Pater - Concession 11, Part Lot 8, North Shore Road, District of Storrington - Consent to create a new lot
20 - 25
d)
S-44-17-L - Geoffrey & Amanda Burns, Jeffrey & Jocelyn Ingle Concession 7, Part Lot 24, North Shore Road - Consent to create a new lot S-45-17-L - Geoffrey & Amanda Burns, Jeffrey & Jocelyn Ingle Concession 7, Part Lot 24, North Shore Road - Consent to create a new lot S-46-17-L - Geoffrey & Amanda Burns, Jeffrey & Jocelyn Ingle Concession 7, Part Lot 24, North Shore Road - Consent to create a new lot
26 - 33
New Minor Variance Applications:
a)
MV-35-17-S - John Trip and Taryn Turnbull - Concession 2, Part Lot 12/13, Red Maple Lane, District of Storrington - Variance to permit a reduction in separation between buildings to 1.5m from 3m
34 - 36
b)
MV-36-17-B - Darcy & Catherine Byrtus - Concession 7, Part Lot 22, Upper Lake Lane, District of Bedford - Variance to permit construction of an addition to an existing dwelling within the 30m setback from water
37 - 39
3 - 13
Page 1 of 54
c)
MV-37-17-S - Joseph & Donna Payne - Concession 10, Part Lot 27, Carrying Place Road, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction of a new dwelling within the 30m setback from water
40 - 45
d)
MV-38-17-S - Mark & Christine Erdman - Concession 10, Part Lot 27, Robert Hogan Lane, District of Storrington -Variance to permit construction of an addition to an existing dwelling within the 30m setback from water
46 - 51
e)
MV-39-17-S - Paul McKercher - Concession 2, Part Lot 22, Sandstone Court, District of Storrington - Variance to permit construction of an accessory building in front of the principal building
52 - 54
Other Business
Adjournment
a)
Resolution
Page 2 of 54
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MINUTES 17:07 August 10, 2017 LOCATION:
South Frontenac Municipal Offices, Sydenham
IN ATTENDANCE:
Ron Sleeth (Storrington District-C) Ken Gee (Storrington District) David Hahn (Bedford District) Larry Redden (Portland District) Ross Sutherland (Loughborough District-C) John McDougall (Portland District-C)
ABSENT WITH REGRETS:
John Sherbino (Loughborough District) Alan Revill (Bedford District-C) Ross Sutherland (Loughborough District-C)
STAFF:
Lindsay Mills – Secretary-Treasurer/Planner Jennie Kapusta – Deputy Secretary Treasurer
Table of Contents Item # 1: Call to Order ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Item # 2: Adoption of the Agenda ………………………………………………………………………… 1 Item # 3: Declaration of Pecuniary Interest …………………………………………………………… 1 Item # 4: Approval of Minutes……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Item # 5: MV-30-17-S (Savard) …………………………………………………………………………… 2 Item # 6: S-37-17-S (Poole/Atkins) ………………………………………………………………………. 3 Item # 7: S-38-17-S (Poole/Atkins) ………………………………………………………………………. 5 Item # 8: S-39-17-B (Greenslade) ……………………………………………………………………….. 6 Item # 9: S-40-17-L (Veryzer/Rapin) ……………………………………………………………………. 7 Item # 10: MV-33-17-S (Funk)…………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Item # 11: MV-34-17-P (Engel/Bylsma) ………………………………………………………………… 9 Item #14: Other Business …………………………………………………………………………………. 10 Item #21: Adjournment …………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Item # 1: Call to Order RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:01
Moved by: L. Redden
Seconded by: J. McDougall
THAT the August 10, 2017 meeting of the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment is hereby called to order at 7:05 p.m. with David Hahn in the Chair. Carried Item # 2: Adoption of the Agenda Approved as circulated Item # 3: Declaration of Pecuniary Interest None declared Item # 4: Approval of Minutes RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:02
Moved By: J. McDougall
Seconded By: L. Redden
Page 3 of 54
2 THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby approves the minutes of the July 13, 2017 meeting of the Committee, as circulated. Carried Item # 5: MV-30-17-S (Savard) Speaking to the Application: Francois Savard Discussion: This application previously came to the July Committee meeting but was deferred to give the applicant time to revise and resubmit an alternative proposal which reduced the total footprint and lot coverage of the proposed dwelling. There was a minor variance granted previously on this property for a 1500 square foot dwelling to be located a minimum of 54 feet from the high-water mark of Dog Lake. However, it was granted in 2003 and was varying the Township of Storrington’s Zoning By-law which was repealed and replaced with the current Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75. The applicant submitted all the original supporting documentation which was in favour of the proposal. Given the time between the original approval and the current submission the proposal was recirculated to the applicable agencies. The subject land consists of 0.4 +/- acres with frontage on Hideaway Lane and Dog Lake. The property is currently vacant. The ORIGINAL proposal was for the construction of a 2142 square foot footprint dwelling to be located a minimum of 14.6m (48 feet) from the high-water mark of Dog Lake. Included in this footprint is a 744 square foot attached garage, a 196 square foot enclosed screen porch and 280 square feet of decks. The dwelling is proposed to be a single story with a walkout basement facing the lake. The maximum lot coverage permitted for this property is 5% (870 square foot footprint); with a 2142 square foot footprint the proposed dwelling has lot coverage of 12.4% The applicant has submitted revised plans for the proposed dwelling, reducing the total footprint from 2142 square feet to 1642 square feet which reduces the lot coverage from 12.4% to 9.4%. While reduced in size this proposal still exceeds the maximum 5% permitted by the zoning by-law. The applicant has also increased the setback from the water to 15.46m (50.75 feet) as a result of the reduced footprint. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. The planning department has evaluated the revised proposal and is unable to support the application for an increase in lot coverage over the permitted 5% (870 square feet) but are able to support the reduction in setback from the water due to lot and septic constraints. Staff would be able to support a principal building with a maximum footprint of 870 square feet with both a second story and walkout basement. This would allow the applicant a similar gross floor area as proposed without compromising lot coverage. Mr. Savard indicated he was not interested in a multi-storey dwelling as this is planned as a retirement property. He said he has already reduced the size of the proposed dwelling as a result of feedback from the CRCA to the size approved in the prior minor variance. R. Sleeth revisited the site and said he understands the planner’s position but also Mr. Savard’s desire to have a bungalow and he is willing to support the application at a 1500 square foot footprint. KFL&A Public Health has indicated that should the applicant wish to construct a modest house (200m2 or less, 3 bedrooms, 20 plumbing fixtures, 10m in depth) as per the original application then they maintain their prior position of no objection, provided the dwelling is to be located no more than 15m from the high water mark (HWM) of Dog Lake in order to accommodate the required septic system. This location for the septic system is required in order to meet the minimum clearances to both neighbour`s wells and the HWM. Should the above noted parameters be exceeded, KFL&A Public Health have stated that the lot would not be able to accommodate both the dwelling and a septic system of suitable size; as such they would recommend denial. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) had requested deferral as the size of the current proposal is significantly larger than the original 2003 application and they would like an opportunity for further evaluation of the application. CRCA have indicated that should the applicant reduce the size of the dwelling to that which was approved in the 2003 variance then they would have no objections to the application. After considering the revised proposal of 1642 square foot footprint, the CRCA has indicated they are unable to support any increase in lot coverage over the 1500 square feet originally approved in 2003 and as such are recommending denial as submitted. The building department has no objections.
Page 4 of 54
3 RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:03
Moved by: R. Sleeth
Seconded by: K. Gee
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES a maximum 1500 square foot minor variance application MV-30-17-S by Donna and Francois Savard, to permit construction within the 30m setback from water, in Concession 8, Part Lot 10, Hideaway Lane, District of Storrington, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-30-17-S Donna and Francois Savard Concession 8, Lot/Part Lot 10, Hideaway Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 10.3.1 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction within the 30m setback from water and an increase in lot coverage from 5% to 8.4% Date of Hearing: July 13, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 Decision:
MINOR VARIANCE APPROVED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for construction of a maximum 1500 square foot footprint, single storey dwelling with walkout basement to be located a minimum of 15.46 metres from the high water mark of Dog Lake.
- Minor variance MV-30-17-L is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
- The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and Parks Canada – Rideau Canal office for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works. Item # 6: S-37-17-S (Poole/Atkins) Speaking to the Application: Brad Harmsen (agent) Discussion: The subject land consists of 176 +/- acres with frontage on Greenfield Road, Loughborough Lake and the Loughborough Lake Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. The lot is developed with a single detached dwelling and multiple detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m (250 feet) of frontage on Greenfield Road. The retained parcel will encompass all existing structures and have 628 feet of frontage on Greenfield Road left after the creation of the proposed lot. While the subject property has a Provincially Significant Wetland on the property, the proposed lot is outside the minimum required setback for development of 120m from a mapped Provincially Significant Wetland area. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections. KFL&A Public Health has no objections. Public Works has no objections to the application but has indicated that a site meeting will be required prior to obtaining an approved entrance permit due to limited sightlines on Greenfield Road. The building department has no objections. RESOLUTION: Moved by: R. Sleeth
C of A: 17:07:04 Seconded by: K. Gee
Page 5 of 54
4 THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES consent application S-37-17-S by Kendall Poole and Evelyn Atkins, to approve a new lot, in Concession 4, Part Lot 20/21, Greenfield Road, District of Storrington, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-37-17-S Kendall Poole, Evelyn Atkins Concession 4, Lot/Part Lot 20/21, Greenfield Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 DECISION:
PROVISIONAL CONSENT BE GRANTED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-37-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m (250 feet) of frontage on Greenfield Road.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
- The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the severed parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
- The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.
Page 6 of 54
5 7. The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-37-17-S.permit. Item # 7: S-38-17-S (Poole/Atkins) Speaking to the Application: Brad Harmsen (agent) Discussion: The subject land consists of 176 +/- acres with frontage on Greenfield Road, Loughborough Lake and the Loughborough Lake Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. The lot is developed with a single detached dwelling and multiple detached accessory buildings. The proposal is for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m (250 feet) of frontage on Greenfield Road. The retained parcel will encompass all existing structures and have 378 feet of frontage on Greenfield Road left after the creation of the proposed lot. While the subject property has a Provincially Significant Wetland on the property, the proposed lot is outside the minimum required setback for development of 120m from a mapped Provincially Significant Wetland area. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot. Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections. Comments from KFL&A Public Health have yet to be received. Public Works has no objections to the application but has indicated that a site meeting will be required prior to obtaining an approved entrance permit due to limited sightlines on Greenfield Road. The building department has no objections. RESOLUTION: Moved by: R. Sleeth
C of A: 17:07:05 Seconded by: K. Gee
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby approves consent application S-38-17-S by Kendall Poole and Evelyn Atkins, to approve a new lot, in Concession 4, Part Lot 20/21, Greenfield Road, District of Storrington, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-38-17-S Kendall Poole, Evelyn Atkins Concession 4, Lot/Part Lot 20/21, Greenfield Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 DECISION:
PROVISIONAL CONSENT BE GRANTED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-38-17-S shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m (250 feet) of frontage on Greenfield Road.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
- The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the severed parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
Page 7 of 54
6
- The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed and retained lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.
- The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-38-17-S. Item # 8: S-39-17-B (Greenslade) Speaking to the Application: Brad Greenslade Discussion: The subject land consists of 37.8 +/- acres with frontage on Green Bay Road, Burridge Road Burridge Lake. The lot is currently listed as vacant. However during site inspection the building department discovered multiple structures. The proposal is for the creation of a 1.58 +/- acre lot addition approximately 97 feet of frontage on Burridge Lake and no road frontage. The retained parcel will be 35 +/- acres in size and will encompass the existing structures. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot addition. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department visited the site and they have no objections to the application. However, during the site visit it was discovered that there multiple structures that appear to have been constructed without any building permits or planning permission. There is a 12.4 foot by 10.3 foot cabin with attached 16.6 foot by 12 foot deck located approximately 12 feet from Burridge Lake, plus a 12.2 foot by 8.3 foot shed located approximately 45 feet from Burridge Lake. The building department has issued a letter advising the applicant that these structures do not meet the setbacks required by the zoning by-law from the lake, that they are too small to be considered principal structures on the property, that they would have required building permits for construction and as such need to be removed. These structures are located on what would be the retained parcel. RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:06
Moved by: J. McDougall
Seconded by: L. Redden
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES consent application S-39-17-B by Donald Greenslade, to create a lot addition, in Concession 8, Part Lot 22, District of Bedford, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner:
S-39-17-B Donald Greenslade Page 8 of 54
7 Location of Property:
Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 22, Green Bay Road/Burridge Road, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a lot addition Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 DECISION:
PROVISIONAL CONSENT BE GRANTED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-39-17-B shall be for the creation of a 1.58 +/lot addition only to 71 Greenslade Lane (ARN 102901005023553).
- Prior to the stamping of the deeds for the lot addition created through Consent Application S39-17-B, the applicant shall remove the illegally built structures.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
- The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)]. Item # 9: S-40-17-L (Veryzer/Rapin) Speaking to the Application: John McLaren Discussion: The subject land consists of 38 +/- acres with frontage on Rosedale Road. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m (250 feet) of frontage on Rosedale Road. The retained parcel will be 36 +/- acres in size and will have 94 +/metres of frontage on Rosedale Road. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed new lot. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required. KFL&A Public Health has no objections. Public Works has no objections to a new entrance. The building department has no objections. RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:07
Moved by: K. Gee
Seconded by: R. Sleeth
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES consent application S-40-17-L by Krista Veryzer and Paul Rapin to create a new lot, in Concession 6, Part Lot 4, Rosedale Road, District of Loughborough, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-40-17-L Krista Veryzer, Paul Rapin Concession 4, Lot/Part Lot 6, Rosedale Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create a new lot Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 DECISION:
PROVISIONAL CONSENT BE GRANTED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
Page 9 of 54
8
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-40-17-L shall be for the creation of a minimum 2.0 acre residential lot with a minimum of 76m of frontage on Rosedale Road.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
- The Township of South Frontenac shall receive 5% of the value of the severed parcel in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
- The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.
- The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-40-17-L. Item # 10: MV-33-17-S (Funk) Speaking to the Application: Ryan and Christina Funk Discussion: The subject land consists of 0.94 +/- acres with frontage on Ramparts Road. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the construction of a 36 foot by 32 foot (1152 square feet) detached accessory building to be located a minimum of 120 feet from the front property line. While the proposed structure meets the required front yard setback the principal building is located at a setback of 140 feet from the front property line; as such this places the accessory building in the front yard contrary to the provisions of the zoning by-law. Comments from KFL&A Public Health, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections. RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:08 Page 10 of 54
9
Moved by: R. Sleeth
Seconded by: K. Gee
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES minor variance application MV-29-17-L by Christina Sinclair to permit a reduction in side yard setback, in Concession 5, Part Lot 2, 3080 Rutledge Road, District of Loughborough, subject to conditions. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-33-17-S Ryan & Christina Funk Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 12, Ramparts Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.24.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of an accessory building in front of the main building Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 Decision:
MINOR VARIANCE APPROVED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for construction of a maximum 1155 square foot footprint, single story detached accessory building, no living space permitted, and to be located a minimum of 120 feet from the front property line of 5163 Ramparts Road.
- Minor variance MV-33-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac. Item # 11: MV-34-17-P (Engel/Bylsma) Speaking to the Application: Sean Bylsma Discussion: The subject land consists of 20.25 +/- acres with frontage on First Lake Road. The property is currently vacant. The proposal is to reduce the required Minimum Distance Separation from 243 metres to a minimum of 116 metres to permit construction of a residential dwelling. The Minimum Distance Separation (MDS) Formulae are land use planning tools that determine setback distances between livestock barns, manure storages or anaerobic digesters and surrounding land uses. The objective of MDS is to minimize land use conflicts and nuisance complaints related to odour. MDS does not account for other nuisances such as noise or dust. MDS is made up of two separate, but related, formulae that act reciprocally to site both new development and new or expanding livestock facilities. The reason for requesting the minor variance is that the building area outside the MDS setback is flooded and rocky and unsuitable for locating a septic system. The applicant has agreed that should the minor variance be granted, they will enter into an agreement to place covenants on title of the property which acknowledge the reduction in MDS and the limitations of current and future owners to register complaints regarding normal farm practices against the surrounding landowners. KFL&A Public Health have no objections. Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections. R. Sleeth questioned whether the registration of conditions would follow the property; answered yes by Planner Mills. R. Sleeth asked if the construction of this house would affect the ability of the farmer to expand his current operations. As there is are existing houses which are closer than the proposed dwelling, the ability for expansion is already limited and this construction will not further impede expansion. Janet Elliott and Anne Robertson, representing Land Conservancy for Kingston, questioned whether other farmers in the area would be affected by this construction, and said there are lots of cattle in the area already but not barns. RESOLUTION: Moved by: J. McDougall
C of A: 17:07:09 Seconded by: L. Redden Page 11 of 54
10
THAT the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES minor variance application MV-34-17-P by Sean Bylsma and Jennifer Engel, to permit a reduction in MDS for the purpose of construction of a dwelling, in Concession 12, Part Lot , First Lake Road, District of Portland, subject to conditions, including no objections to normal farm practices. Carried Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-34-17-P Jennifer Engel, Sean Bylsma Concession 12, Lot/Part Lot 18, First Lake Road, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.35.a. of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of a dwelling within the normally required Minimum Distance Separation required for existing livestock facilities Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017 Date of Decision: August 10, 2017 Decision:
MINOR VARIANCE APPROVED, subject to conditions
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for the reduction of the required Minimum Distance Separation from 243 metres to a minimum of 116 metres to permit construction of a residential dwelling.
- Minor variance MV-34-17-P is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
- The applicant shall enter into an agreement to place restrictive covenants on title of the property regarding which acknowledge the reduction in MDS and the limitations of current and future owners to register complaints regarding normal farm practices against the surrounding landowners including future livestock facility expansions. Item #14: Other Business Bob Chagus (agent for Bob Galt estate) explained that two (2) lots existed originally but have since merged through common ownership and he is presenting a Validation Order to separate rather than a Consent Application. That each lot had undergone a series of lot additions, approved by the Township, through the years to increase their respective sizes, but as neither had undergone Consent at any point, they merged once common ownership happened. Section 57 of the Planning Act allows this validation order vs. a consent application. This issue was raised during the due diligence of the buyer’s lawyer during sale of the smaller cottage property. RESOLUTION:
C of A: 17:07:10
Moved by: J. McDougall
Seconded by: K. Gee
THAT the August 10, 2017 meeting of the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment hereby APPROVES the validation order for 75 Sunbeam Lane and 336 Sunset Shores Lane. Carried Item #21: Adjournment RESOLUTION: Moved by: K. Gee
C of A: 17:07:11 Seconded by: R. Sleeth
THAT the August 10, 2017 meeting of the South Frontenac Township Committee of Adjustment is hereby adjourned at 7:50 p.m. to reconvene at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 14, 2017 or at the call of the Chair. Page 12 of 54
11
Carried
Alan Revill Chair
Lindsay Mills Secretary-Treasurer
Page 13 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 6, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-41-17-L James Campbell Concession 5, Lot/Part Lot 6, Copper Head Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create lot addition Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 2.5 +/- acres with frontage on Copper Head Lane and Canoe Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single dwelling. The proposal is for the creation of a 0.05 +/- acre (2175 square feet) lot addition with approximately 20 feet of frontage on Canoe Lake. The purpose of this lot addition is to provide safe access to Canoe Lake from the lot it is to be added to given the steep topography of the shoreline in this area. The retained parcel will be 2.5 +/- acres in size and will have 170 +/- metres of frontage on Canoe Lake. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot addition.
Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-41-17-B shall be for the creation of an approximately 2175 square foot lot addition with 20 feet of frontage on Canoe Lake.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. Page 14 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
ATTACHMENTS Map of Campbell Property
Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 15 of 54
µ CAMPBELL S-41-17-B
Canoe Lake
Legend
Canoe Lake
Campbell Property Campbell Lot Addition
Retained Parcel
Lot to be Enlarged
Eel Lake
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
ILS ON ES W JA M
Page 16 of 54
RO AD
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Scale 1:2,333 0
10 20
40
60
80 Meters
UTM Projection NAD 83
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 7, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-42-17-B Stephen Morris Concession 3, Lot/Part Lot 7, McNichols Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create lot addition Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a lot addition be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 2.43 +/- acres with frontage on McNichols Lane and 35.5 metres of frontage on Thirty Island Lake. The lot is currently vacant. The proposal is for the creation of a 0.16 +/- acre lot addition that encompasses, and is the surveyed right-of-way for McNichols Lane. The owners of the lot to be enlarged, Paul and Janice McNichols believed they already owned this section of land and that it was joined with their lakefront cottage property. They have pipes for their septic system running underground in this location and are planning on trenching for electric cables for a proposed garage (approved minor variance MV-20-17-B). The purpose of this lot addition is to rectify this situation. This lot addition will increase the size of a significantly undersized waterfront lot. The retained parcel will be 2.3 +/- acres in size and will retain all 35.5 metres of frontage on Thirty Island Lake. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed lot addition. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from Quinte Conservation Authority, KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-42-17-B shall be for the creation of a 0.16 +/lot only to 490 McNichols Lane (PIN 362510085).
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. Page 17 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5. The Township of South Frontenac shall receive $100 in lieu of parkland [Planning Act, s. 51(1)].
ATTACHMENTS Map of Morris/McNichols Property
Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 18 of 54
µ Lot to be Enlarged
MORRIS S-42-17-B
Thirty Island Lake
490 McNichols Lane
Legend Morris Property McNichols Property Morris Lot Addition
Retained Parcel 480 McNichols Lane 21 Hillside Lane
Page 19 of 54
MCNICHOLS LANE
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
H
DE SI L IL
LA
NE
Thirty Island Lake
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Scale 1:1,148 0
5
10
20
30
40 Meters
UTM Projection NAD 83
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 7, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-43-17-S Elizabeth & Joseph Pater Concession 11, Lot/Part Lot 8, North Shore Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create lot addition Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 6.5 +/- acres with frontage on North Shore Road and Loughborough Lake. The lot is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the creation of a 3.32 +/- acre lot encompassing the eastern half of the existing property. The retained parcel will be 3.52 +/- acres in size and have 274m of frontage on Loughborough Lake and a minimum of 76m of frontage on North Shore Road. A significant portion of the area of the proposed lot encompasses defined wetland areas and as such is unsuitable for development. The applicant has proposed this severance for the purposes of deeding the new lot to the Nature Conservancy of Canada to allow for proper management and long-term protection of this wetland area. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed new lot. Current Zoning: Residential Waterfront (RW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections the proposal provided that the lot to be created is required to be rezoned in such a way to prohibit future development on the lot. Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-43-17-S shall be for the creation of a 3.32 +/acre lot with 109 metres of frontage on North Shore Road and 314 metres of frontage on Loughborough Lake. The retained parcel must have a minimum of 76 metres of frontage on North Shore Road.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
Page 20 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4. In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds. 5. Prior to the stamping of the deeds for the lot to be created through Consent Application S-4317-S, the applicant shall be required to rezone the new lot from Residential Waterfront (RW) to Open Space – Private (OSP) in order to limit future development on the property. Please see Planner Lindsay Mills to begin this process. 6. A road widening dedication to the satisfaction of the Township will be required.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Pater Property
Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 21 of 54
µ 6386 North Shore Road PATER S-43-17-S
Legend Pater Property Pater Proposed Lot
d se o op r P
RT NO
Page 22 of 54
ROCK PO
H
O SH
INT LANE
R
O ER
AD
t Lo
Retained Parcel 6306 North Shore Road
Loughborough Lake
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
19 Rock Point Lane
Scale 1:2,398 0
10 20
40
60
80 Meters
UTM Projection NAD 83
Page 23 of 54
|‘L’lI?.|.H-WEI E".|II-ul?q: Th-ziliuclnbhulkd-I?HrHlTfLH.itI.-h?H.?lILtiIH.I??M’H?IH-5H’iP. Lm.[hhI1u?j’in'1:LLnmLrddw?n|r-d.iuuJhHmnEuu?.:uu1?:??.:h.Tb
Till‘
‘bi:hml1Th:¢Jn:w:D?uLfh1trIu.:h}r=hun1’rli1u.3?Lhdl1JJnh1:&:I. hTn1u1|jII£‘nnfhrI:un111hnndrh.r.ILlL|1d’h’hw?rhp’§lI?I’:plH1
E.||:|||.?’|jI’|;|.||.’!].I!’.|| F"..||’.I’.|rgF.;|-|..:.5Ir.5-:uI:uI1r|.p’|:I.Ir|’.nI’|.III. :IuII.|.lun|;I1’.I’J:I:Il’I.I.l’I.l’.l|.’.I..‘r|.‘J.|.t|I,|_ n1lhI5i.n:’?:Edh?.Lp:unh.¥hHH?bH’bH¥H:hH-E?iEH.I?HlhJ.t¢hH’?:El
u.i::n.:u?l.:u:uT.:l]:nIt’:IE1:ullrH.|:L!innl’|.uTl’F1n’hd1. :I.’:I’::|:r:I2$.l|htI’:::I.EI:|u:ItdI:|I:tI’:|u|:
I
:I|‘lh:
1-|:’£tIEH.E|I?
F’I.lI.I’I:II:|I:I’.‘I.-|I.u:I:I-:n’II.In|h.’ E|.:.’:i.|’.’|I|’:t:I::I.l’I:-:I’
2|.IJ.I.
Page 24 of 54
Page 25 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 7, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
S-44-17-L, S-45-17-L & S-46-17-L Geoffrey & Amanda Burns, Jeffrey & Jocelyn Ingle Concession 7, Part Lot 24, North Shore Road, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Consent to create three new lots Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the consent application to create a new lot be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 147 +/- acres with frontage on North Shore Road and Leland Road. The lot is currently vacant. Previously there had been two Consent Applications given Provisional Approval (S-15-17-L and S-24-17-L), however the applicant had formally withdrawn these applications in order to submit the current applications. The proposals are for the creation two 2.15 +/acre residential lots, each with a minimum of 76m of frontage on North Shore Road, and one 50 +/acre lot with approximately 455m of frontage on North Shore Road. The retained parcel will be approximately 92.5 +/- acres in size and have frontage on North Shore Road and Leland Road. There are significant portions of the subject property which are designated as Provincially Significant Wetland, however both proposed 2.15 +/- acre residential lots are outside the required 120m setback for development and the 50 +/- acre lot has sufficient land area outside this required setback for a building envelope. The planning department is able to support the application for the proposed new lots. Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objections to the creation of any of the three lots to be created. KFL&A Public Health have indicated that the lot to be created through consent application S-44-17-L (northern 2 acre lot) is flexible in terms of siting a septic system; and that the lot to be created through consent application S-45-17-L (southern 2 acre lot) has a site specific septic location along the northern edge of the proposed lot due to limited soil depth over the remainder of the lot. Comments for the lot to be created through consent application S-46-17-L were not required from KFL&A. Public Works has no objections. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- An acceptable reference plan or legal description of the severed lands in duplicate [Registry Act, s.81, Land Titles Act, s. 150], and the deed or instrument conveying the severed lands shall be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer for review and consent endorsement within a period of one year [Planning Act, s. 53(41)] after the “Notice of Decision” is given [Planning Act, ss. 53(17) and 53(24)].
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-44-17-L shall be for the creation of a 2.15 +/acre lot with 90 metres of frontage on North Shore Road. Page 26 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-45-17-L shall be for the creation of a 2.15 +/acre lot with approximately 190 metres of frontage on North Shore Road.
- The land to be severed by Consent Application S-45-17-L shall be for the creation of a 50 +/acre lot with 455 metres of frontage on North Shore Road.
- Payment of the balance of any outstanding taxes and local improvement charges shall be made to the Township Treasurer. This includes all taxes levied as of the date of the stamping of the deeds.
- In the event that there are abandoned wells located on the property being severed, and the retained property, they be sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of the Environment and that this work be accomplished prior to the stamping of the deeds.
- The surveyor who prepares the reference plan referred to in condition #1 shall also determine by survey the width of the public road abutting the severed lands measured from the centre line of the traveled portion of the road to the lot line of the owner’s property. If such width is less than 33 ft., the owner shall dedicate to the Township land along the frontage of the severed and/or retained lands as the case may be in the following manner: a. The land to be dedicated shall be the width required to provide 33 ft. from the centre of the existing travelled road; b. The land to be dedicated shall be described as a separate part on a Reference Plan of Survey to be prepared and deposited at the Owner’s expense and filed with the Secretary-Treasurer prior to the stamping of the deeds; c. The Transfer/Deed from the Owner for the land to be dedicated shall be engrossed in the name of “The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac”, and shall include the following attached to the Transfer/Deed as a Schedule: The Transferor hereby transfers the lands to the municipality for the purpose of widening the adjacent highway pursuant to Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, Chapter 25, as amended. d. The Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated shall be registered by the Owner at the Owner’s expense; e. The duplicate registered Transfer/Deed for the land to be dedicated together with a letter of opinion of a solicitor qualified to practice law in the Province of Ontario addressed to the Secretary-Treasurer confirming that the municipality acquired good and marketable title to the land free and clear of all liens and encumbrances shall be delivered to the Secretary-Treasurer prior to stamping of Deeds.
- The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-44-17-L.
- The applicant must submit a well driller’s report demonstrating a potable water pumping capacity of 3.5 gallons per minute sustained over a 6-hour pump test for the parcel severed through consent application S-45-17-L.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Burns/Ingle Property
Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 27 of 54
µ BURNS S-44-17-L S-45-17-L S-46-17-L
Legend Burns Property
Retained Parcel
Burns Proposed Lot 1 Burns Proposed Lot 2 Burns Proposed Lot 3
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
E LA N
E
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
NE
LANE
LA EMERALD
LE PEBB
Page 28 of 54
KO EN
R SHO
KOEN ROAD
TH NOR
D RO A
Loughborough Lake
Scale 1:5,254 0
25
50
100
150
UTM Projection NAD 83
200 Meters
Member of
nmunuw CONSERVATION AUTHORITY CATARAQUI
1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, Ontario KOH1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956—CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E—mai|: info@crca.ca Websites: www.crca.ca 8L www.c|eanwatercataraqui.ca
M A Conservation
“($3
8, 2017
Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0 Dear Ms. Kapusta: Re:
Applications for Consent to Sever S-44-17-L, S-45-17-L & S-46-17-L (Burns) Part Lot 24, Concession 7; North Shore Road Township of South Frontenac (Loughborough) Waterbody: Leland Provincially Significant Wetland / Loughborough Lake Swamp ANSI
Staff of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) have reviewed the above-noted applications for consent to sever and offer the following comments for the Land Division Committee’s consideration.
The applicant has requested severance of three lots consisting of 0.86 hectares (Lot 1), 0.90 hectares (Lot 2), and 20.29 hectares (Lot 3) respectively of land from a property located at Lot 24, Concession 7 in the Township of South Frontenac. It is proposed that the lots to be severed will have road frontage onto North Shore Road and are proposed to be used for future residential development. The lot to be retained would be approximately 60.7 hectares in area.
The property is located on the north and west side of North Shore Road, west of Loughborough Lake. The severed and retained parcels have water frontage onto the Leland Provincially Signi?cant Wetland (PSW), and there is an un-named tributary that is located on the western side of the property. The Leland PSW is also a part of the larger Loughborough Lake Swamp Area of Natural and Scienti?c Interest (ANSI). The lots to be severed are presently vacant.
The property is currently designated ‘Rural’ and ‘Provincially Signi?cant Wetland’ in the Of?cial Plan and ‘Rural’ (RU) and ‘Environmental Protection’ (EP) in the implementing Zoning By-law for South Frontenac Township. The EP zone appears to coincide with the boundary of the Leland PSW.
Page 29 of 54
Page 30 of 54
Page 31 of 54
.0. KFL&A Public Health
Environmental
To INSPECTION REp0RT
Health Department
Receipt Number: SK—44-2017
File Number:
S-44v17—L Owner(s):
Burns, Geoffrey & Amanda
—
lngle, Jeffrey & Jocelyn ward / Farmer Township: Loughborough
Municipality:
Township of South Frontenac Registered
Concession:
Lot:
7
Plan of Subdivision:
Part(s):
Plan:
13 R—18071
1
General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water
Severed:
—0pen field with some elevated hills —Nostructures/well
Retained:
—N/A
and sewage, etc)
Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water table with bar. Show estimated permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable.
Severed
Depth of Soil
Topsoil
Rock/shale
0.0 m 0.3 m 06 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m
Retained
N/A
Percolation rate (estimated):
Percolation rate (estimated):
NOTE: the approval of any new lot is based on its suitability to provide an area for a Class 4 septic tank system for an average 3 bedroom home. Approval to build a larger home on this lot will be subject to availability of sufficient area for a larger septic tank system.
Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:
SEVERED
Conditions:
Soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil a sewage disposal system. Specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. The proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system, dependent on the proposal submitted through an Application to ~
to construct Satisfactory
—
Unsatisfactory Site Flexible
Construct
a Sewage System. Septic must be located in an area where at least 10 inches of native soil present over rock/shale
Site Specific
RETAINED
—
Conditions:
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible
Site Specific
Inspector:
Miranda Iezzi
CPHl(C), Public Health Inspector
Approved:
/‘ /l
’ lc I 7»
Date: August
- 2017
PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&A PUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and will be used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, KFL&APublic Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 5494232 ext. 1243 or 1»800»267-7875.
Page 32 of 54
.9. KFL&A Public Health
SEVER
Environmental Health Department
|NspEcT|0N
REpoRT
Receipt Number:
File Number: 5-45-17—L
SK—44—2017
0wner(s): Burns, Geoffrey & Amanda
—
Ingle, Jeffrey & Jocelyn Ward / Former Township: Loughborough
Municipality:
Township of South Frontenac Lot:
Registered Plan: 13 R1807 1
Concession:
7
Plan of Subdivision:
Part(s):
1
General Description (existing buildings, surface features, slopes, site services for water and sewage, etc)
Severed:
—Openfield with some elevated hills ~No structures/well
Retained:
-N/A
Soil type, depth and water table on each part of potential leaching bed areas. Indicate water table with bar. Show estimated permeability (good, fair, poor) for each part where natural soil is acceptable. Severed
Depth of Soil
Topsoil
Rock/shale
Retained
0_0 m
0.3 m 0,6 m 0.9 m 1.2 m 1.5 m
N/A
Percolation rate (estimated):
Percolation rate (estimated):
NOTE: the approval of any new lot is based on its suitability to provide an area for a Class 4 septic tank system for an average 3 bedroom home. Approval to build a larger home on this lot will be subject to availability of sufficient area for a larger septic tank system.
Suitability for on-site sewage disposal:
SEVERED
Conditions:
Soil conditions found on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil a sewage disposal system. Specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. The proposed lot is capable of providing flexibility in siting a sewage disposal system, dependent on the proposal submitted through an Application to Construct a Sewage System. The location of the septic system to be located along the North West lot line (lot line shared with lot #1) as 10 inches of soil is present over rock/shale. —
to construct Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory Site Flexible
Site specific
RETAINED
—
Conditions:
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Site Flexible
Site Specific
Inspector:
Miranda Iezzi
CPHl(C), Public Health Inspector
Approved:
\QV
Date:
A‘
- 2017 AUEUSI
PLEASEFORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISIONTO KFL&APUBLIC HEALTH. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Building Code Act, and Willbe used for the administration of Public Health programs. Any questions about the collection of this information should be directed to the Manager of Environmental Health, l(FL&A Public Health, 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5, (613) 549-1232 ext. 1243 or 1~80O4267-7875.
Page 33 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-35-17-S John Tripp and Taryn Turnbull Concession 2, Lot/Part Lot 12/13, Red Maple Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.24.6 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit a reduction of the required building separation from 3m to 1.5m Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of an accessory building in front of the main building be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 0.86 +/- acres with frontage on Red Maple Lane and Loughborough Lake. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling and a detached accessory building. The proposal is for the construction of a 26 foot by 15 foot addition to the existing dwelling which will reduce the separation between the principal dwelling and the detached accessory building to 1.52 metres (5 feet) from the normally required 3 metres. The Planning Department is able to support the application.
FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:
- Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
- Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from KFL&A Public Health were not required as approval has already been obtained.
Page 34 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for the construction of a 400 square foot addition to an existing dwelling to be located a minimum of 1.52 metres, at the foundation, from the existing detached accessory building.
- Minor variance MV-35-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Tripp Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 35 of 54
µ 4594 Red Maple Lane
TRIPP/TURNBULL MV-35-17-S
Loughborough Lake
4608 Red Maple Lane
D RE
M
LE AP
N LA
Legend
E
Tripp Property Tripp Proposed Addition Existing Buildings
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Page 36 of 54
Scale 1:778 0
3.75 7.5
15
22.5
UTM Projection NAD 83
30 Meters
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: August 3, 2017 Application No: MV-36-17Owner: Darcy & Catherine Byrtus Location of Property: Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 22, Upper Lake Lane, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.10.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of an addition to a dwelling within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: August 10, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of an addition to a dwelling within the 30m setback be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 0.3 +/- acres with frontage on Upper Lake Lane and Burridge Lake. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling located approximately 41 feet from the high water mark of Burridge Lake. The proposal is for an increase in height of the existing structure to permit foundation reconstruction and the creation of a crawlspace (maximum height of 6 feet) for the relocation of services, plus the addition of an 8 foot by 12 foot addition to the south west side of the building. The proposed addition is to facilitate the expansion of the existing bathroom to increase functionality and add storage space, in addition to providing enclosed stairway access to the crawlspace. This addition will be set back 5 feet from the front face of the dwelling and will have a setback from the water of 46 feet. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township.
FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:
- Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
- Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes Page 37 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from KFL&A Public Health and Public Works were not required. Rideau Valley Conservation Authority has no objection to the minor variance provided several site best management practices are incorporated into the site plan agreement. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for a maximum six (6) foot increase in height of the existing structure to permit a crawlspace only (no basement, or living space permitted); plus the construction of an 8 foot by 15 foot addition to the southwest side of the existing structure. This addition is to be constructed a minimum of 46 feet from the high water mark of Burridge Lake.
- Minor variance MV-36-17-B is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
- The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental and limited service policies, and which specifies that a permit will be required from the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Byrtus Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 38 of 54
µ UP PE R
LA
KE
LA N
BYRTUS MV-36-17-B
E
Legend Byrtus Property Byrtus Proposed Addition Existing Buildings
Burridge Lake
Burridge Lake Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Page 39 of 54
Scale 1:470 0
2.25 4.5
9
13.5
UTM Projection NAD 83
18 Meters
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 7, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-37-17-S Joseph & Donna Payne Concession 7, Lot/Part Lot 22, Carrying Place Road, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 8.3.3 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of new dwelling within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of an addition to a dwelling within the 30m setback be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.32 +/- acres with frontage on Carrying Place Lane and Dog Lake. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling, and multiple accessory buildings. The proposal is for demolition of the existing cottage and the construction of a new dwelling, with attached garage, to be located a minimum of 19.1 metres from the high water mark of Dog Lake. The existing cottage has a deck on the water side of the dwelling which extends to 13 metres from the high water mark; the applicant is planning on retaining this deck structure. The topography of the property is such that there is a ridge of land close behind the existing dwelling which limits the opportunity for an increase in setback from the water. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. The Planning Department is able to support the application.
FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:
- Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
- Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes Page 40 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from KFL&A Public Health were not required. Comments from the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team have yet to be received. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for the demolition of the existing cottage and the construction of a new single detached dwelling to be located a minimum of 19 metres from the high water mark of Dog Lake. The existing deck can be retained in its current location a minimum of 13 metres from Dog Lake.
- Minor variance MV-37-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
- The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and the Parks Canada – Rideau Canal Office for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Payne Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 41 of 54
µ PAYNE MV-37-17-S
Dog Lake
Legend Payne Property Payne Proposed Dwelling
4981 Carrying Place Road
Existing Buildings
4971 Carrying Place Road
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
4953 Carrying Place Road
Page 42 of 54
R CA
I NG RY
AC PL
ER
O
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
AD
4954 Carrying Place Road
Scale 1:778 0
3.75 7.5
15
22.5
UTM Projection NAD 83
30 Meters
aterwa
‘1c.;un I)ev«:!upmc11t Rc%‘icw
Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0
Dear Ms. Kapusta: Re:
Application for Minor Variance MV-37-17-S (Payne) Lot 27, Concession 10; 4971 Carrying Place Road Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Dog Lake
The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance, and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. The site was visited by CRCA staff on August 29, 2017. Summary of the Proposal The proposal involves the re-construction and enlargement of a dwelling on the subject property. variance is requested to: 0
The
Reduce the required setback from the high water mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.(1.) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 19.1 metres in order to permit the construction of a new dwelling.
Site Description The property is located on south shore of Dog Lake. The topography of the property can be described as a 2 metre high slope adjacent to the water and then rising slowly toward the location of the existing dwelling on the property.
The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Waterfront Residential’ (RW) in the implementing Zoning By-law
Worééing ‘?,)getf§§erin OneEinvironnaeyjt l’arks;(7;anada~?a’:ic¥cau(‘anal
bl3~283—7l99
is‘
;kw.‘h<‘ Tkiidezaxz!’aE1ieg*(;<)nserva1iun ti:L_Tz)nser’o’ati()n Rcggzgion Aut?horitil C:.:s1é:ara<2;ui
ritt.? %—s_’
};¢2ZZ%i?%«57‘%‘ 613-546-4228
Page 43 of 54
I.l.|.J.—.l.| (MV-3 7- 17-S) Ms. liq.-.|‘l.l’|-’-III-I1-IJ Jennie Kapusta Eqjur-5, Ell.‘ September 6, 2017
I1|u|.:I.I.lu— Discussion rI’:|’.|.F|‘I.1’|F!T H’r|l’:I’I.|LI.—’:hI-a.:.l.Id ThII.rr.IJ.‘I natural hazards associated lnlill the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of of The main interests ||:r|’.I.I|i!I’.LnI’.I1J’l:|’.I.I’|.I|‘L1.n.nI the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of with ‘I-‘i|:|:|lb!-In|:|-:-|’-I-|.|.‘I-I-:-f’|J|:-ELIIII.?tj?iblit-D-hilt:-H-I!-J1-Hftr?ff?ill-Eu?illh-ihThH1’H.£n-hf -1]-nu-.|f’I:|-:-H.iI-I:-I.||I’-I.-I I‘-|-III-I-ill-Lil-.ri-.-E:l.:-Ia] Historic Site and of the Rideau Canal National the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values II|:|:-.-.|1|.1-|.|-:|:||:i.|:-|JI!r:|-iI.|;:|::|:|l|:-cu:-.|. LI.-.|2iI:I’.’:-Iulr-an-lull-.|:u-mguim-. World Heritage Site. UNESCO
I‘-h:EI:I.|F.|.@:II Hazards Natural The maximum recorded water level for Dog Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. ‘.’-I’ll-i:..Il.I-. For Dog Lake, Flooding: E-I-%.’ TH-lu?l?ll?-l:i|1?lIvlLH’??‘J]|i-i:..iLI?5l..‘35EB?l+I-:1-El-. ?ood ‘I’i–EI.|I’.5.l|.’-I?j The level lieu CRCA’s of Guidelines the recorded is used engineered plain. highest in an water Bjji?lfh?l–j??j. ?‘j%TlI?.“I[$j.‘I|iII’:llIjIK?.?|jH for Implementing Ontario Regulation 148/06 (see description below) requires that all development be Based upon elevation set back a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. jq:::|?I& jil?i?j?l??-I?j?il??. mapping data and site observations, the proposed development will be located outside of the setback the regulatory ?ood plain. from n-:n::|-.n..-q.u’In_-.n_.-I-I.-n.-:.:||;u’.u.L-u E.rIII|I|IIII:E=I:I|.I|.iI.|:|!.Ii that no building or structure or septic tank of the Zoning by-law requires Section 5.8.2 (2) Erosion: ?|I.I1’I’.‘I: I-:I:i.r.:|!|-’|-I1r:I.r.inIr’I:iEr:II!1.i|I1i:I.|.I:1’lInr:l-.??‘1Il:||5£|.I’J. the of shall be located horizontal installation within 15 metre znhil?m?-l|hlnd:£ni&h|5:dm3uin.:?HufErlguTé.uTm3I:u}u:h?.llri:pr top of bank of any embankment, the slope of which is greater than 30% from horizontal. I’..|:H.’,!1I.’[|’&iEIh?E:|‘P!?|l’d-E :||‘IIIh:hiJ"¢‘lh:r..1I2|’.I|.£|’@b’’:?.I.L CRCA policy de?nes the extent of potential erosion |1.:::|‘EI:n|‘I.r.I.|:|uI:I: hrhlITn:I.1lIllII.:|:IILnII’:I:lE:I’hLt::II.m:Id:J-|r.j:1|u’[|. hazards to include an allowance IIIIIIIIII: for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for till shorelines of 3(h):l(v), plus on an estimated 2 metre high slope, the total an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. Based |;|’:I.lu’.m.I.I’.I’.ImI.|lI|lu’III.‘I.InIr.|‘lrr|.l’rI.I |1.I.I.|.|’.:Il’.::I1’.:|.IdIrI-’lI.|,lIIJq.I.:|’|.I’|.’:IJ erosion hazard allowance is anticipated to be approximately 12 metres measured horizontally inland Hill:-lt?liIH.|I1I’?I:Illhhl1I:-Ijll?qlrlt-rljl?tll?ulil?jl |3’|‘lIli|‘I|II|‘l’-EIIII-|‘lII5’I?|’|EI:|I’|1I|.“j|I|l|I’|I1 Staff note that the proposed development will be located from the stable toe of slope at the shoreline. ‘5LI1I’:uhlhi’:h:IpI1:IpIHI!IIdh’dI|I2?IbhIrfJIIl|I2r.1J-pl 5I.::I’.h.‘IIH|:|!.II:I.ITIlI.yI:i.lh: outside of the erosion hazard allowance as de?ned by the CRCA.
Section 5.8.2 (1.) of the Zoning By-Law for South Frontenac Township suggests that a 30 metre setback ?lcrhlEl]|’.].3f?lTuJJ,[H:.-r:rhr51d1Pnl’u’H:T.n1iq1u,|_j?:I1JI’n-’l1l:k The the high water mark is required to be maintained as a buffer in order to protect water quality. T”|II from ?£m?th?:|iHHlliUr¢[HJHT3H?lH?H.HdiiHJ?i’hI:ldF?JFt?’-??l?iiil? Plan also requires that this buffer area be maintained as a natural vegetative buffer strip adjacent Of?cial EFU3idFhuEnm;nnE-!EihHnImhul.H=‘lIJ-ILin?wiHI5dh.LEH?1p-hfnm1 h-’.E:|III’:hI:’:I.-l|ph5.|h’|:In-|.I.?:d.IEI’n.I’::I.IE the water’s edge to ?lter pollutants from runoff. to
the CRCA Planning Policy recommends that new development and site alteration, including Similarly, !huhLjf.blEI|htfh1uqldEfI’u1u’n-lJ&d’uIh1’T.u:nd=LIm’nn1nd’mh:| bucki-a septic system tile ?elds and open or enclosed decks/patios attached to the main dwelling, be set back lq?::5Il-11|If?dlH£rfJ.Hnd:i?di:IlT:?u:nd’udmd'1nu1dI?h,[.rull new development minimum distance of 30 metres from the high water mark of a waterbody. However, F|I2|‘lI’I’lI’El.|’-II’I2|I’|‘I’E-|I:|fl’-l’I|i H.H.iI?I|I1lHI|:ttI!’}U??’?‘E:-D|IrbH.|£.F#HE?‘F’Ei’IiHFt-I-?! considered when there are no reasonable alternatives for locating the the water setback may be within II’.lH.IlkI|‘Ih’:I:I|II.i.:nI.g. brw15Il:u?rE::lln1l’¢uJEI$I3?HIH’Ih’iI1h??2f:-I-:IH.Ei?.n development outside of the water setback area, the development is no closer to the water than existing -irI’:t5:m?.n.t::hnIlhn’:h:?I:I.Iu.1nIh.’d$¢.hm&.I:h!:Irluhum;£q bu?npu?ictnnm?cplluj-mff.Lh:-irrtmlmd-gin-rJL?:1’m::u:?-mrltj: buildings or structures on the property, the development complies with the maximum lot coverage of the Zoning By-law, and suitable methods to minimize negative impacts on water quality provisions rn1unHth:I1,.||5-h1’..ndl:ubH:’|.thn:hh:u’m.m%H::p.mu.IiwquH3’ are incorporated into the development. J’l|‘In’|q.I’.I’:I.Iu’||I’|.1rI.I.’|uII.II.|?’|.l’|:
The proposed development is being reasonably set back since the lot is constrained by a rock outcrop to ThmnndIhI?u|=::luHIiLurnm.I?.Iy?‘h?E?H¢?TIUEII£’?H1h}iH£i?HIE?H ‘inu:?LJllrdndLq.‘inh’I’d.1n?h[Ih:wdlnhlhhl:hullra;?.:?hdEu.:d the south of the dwelling, the development is going no closer to the lake than the existing dwelling, and ‘iI|:r:?|I:-J %I’.:I’|I’&EI:u.n’:::::| bE::|’.’:I’I.’:’|:’n’i.I::I j:::I’.’:LlL|:B:r-|.I’II. in the By-law. &|§i” the proposal complies with the maximum lot coverage provisions contained Sta? recommend that roofruno? be ?Il:n|.I’:I’I-.:|r|‘i’:I.III||.Ilah’.|".I.I.d£I.|u|: directed away fromthe lake possible. rnuul-I|lu’:h:I’.I’m;|‘ru.n;?’?i Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site I-&1.E:§I 1EEL"FEm“‘iHHBW3? Similarly, RWDRT staff strive to preserve and enhance the cultural, natural and scenic Values of the l’:::I.|:||_-.Fi’i’I"|]EI|£’|I|.|i-’|:|I.||:I|‘I:IlIh"-tI:II1I!IH:&:IlIlilJ]|‘I’lJ.$.llIII:r1h:IlI.iiI’-Eh-EIFIIITIIIE lII:II1IEI.I’|.’. future. national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy this legacy into the n1rl|’.b’i1:i!:In’.El|I]|:‘ml|.‘j1I::|‘I|.I:rlH:|-@I.I:r’::h:
Page 44 of 54
Page 2 of 3
TIfI’I—J"I=—’njIT-III’I:fI’—f—IjI—’
Recommendation
;
–.—-rjl
-511
-.I..|_
Lulu:
jl—
‘fl–I-1
I-IJ-
I1-
- -I—-rrl
Jjljj
.|….I__r.
I—-.1-__
.I.-I—.—.r
unju-l.lJ—.|.I.
uu—L-I l—r
H‘ -I-I-rI—I-I
iii
415‘ I‘ -I-I-I.-I-I-—
-I-I-
-2-j
-rl
–II-II-I-IE-III‘-I-II-’-‘III-III-I1–If-I-I-III
II’fI—
fTI’f-’
I‘
I"T— I’ -‘ITZI
1’
—IL—‘I’
-Z?—?I
‘-—J
I
.-
u
I-I—I.I–
If
TI-’—Z’?—I——
|.-.l.I.|.—.-.|I.
-|.|.l_|.l.u.I.|.||.I.|
-I-I-I-I
I+—2T—E2
—J
|.I….|_|.-l
-—-.:-I-.
-I-l–I-l-l–I-Il-
—
_
-I-I–r
2
|.|…|_
|.—.ll.l.|r.|_|.ll.-.l.u
-I-r
—r.’-I-r
rl-I
r.
I’I
I.I
–I-r
Page 45 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: August 3, 2017 Application No: MV-38-17-S Owner: Mark and Christine Erdman Location of Property: Concession 10, Lot/Part Lot 27, Robert Hogan Lane, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.10.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of an addition to a dwelling within the 30m setback from water Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of an addition to a dwelling within the 30m setback be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 1.32 +/- acres with frontage on Carrying Place Lane and Dog Lake. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling, and a detached accessory building. The proposal is for the reconstruction of the roofline and several portions of the existing dwelling, including a cantilevered deck over a brick potion on the water side of the dwelling. This reconstruction will increase the width of this deck by 2 feet for safety purposes and require additional supports to be located within the footprint of the existing brick patio. This variance is for the 2 foot reduction in setback of this deck from Dog Lake from 55 feet to 53 feet. The by-law does not permit the construction of any structures within 30 m of the HWM for the reasons of reducing adverse effects on the environment, maintaining a natural vegetative buffer and aiding in the preservation of the rural character of the Township. The Planning Department is able to support the application.
FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:
- Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
- Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
Page 46 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from KFL&A Public Health were not required. The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team has evaluated the proposal and noted that the proposed development is located outside the setback from the regulatory floodplain and outside the erosion hazard allowance as defined by Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. However, as the proposed development encroaches farther into the required setback that the existing dwelling they are recommending denial of the application. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for the renovation of an existing dwelling and deck. The reconstruction of the deck is permitted to include a 2 foot increase to the existing width, reducing the setback to 53 feet from the high water mark of Dog Lake.
- Minor variance MV-38-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
- The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the Township to be registered on title, which sets out the Township’s environmental policies, and which specifies that a permit may be required from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and the Parks Canada – Rideau Canal Office for the proposed development, and for any shoreline or in-water works.
ATTACHMENTS Map of Erdman Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 47 of 54
ROB
µ
E RT HO G ANE AN L
5137 Robert Hogan Lane
ERDMAN MV-38-17-S
Legend Erdman Property
5121 Robert Hogan Lane
Erdman Proposed Expansion Existing Buildings
Dog Lake
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Page 48 of 54
Scale 1:1,008 0
5
10
20
30
UTM Projection NAD 83
40 Meters
'
‘VVHICTVVBV . . I ,
l)::x’c}npmcntRevicw {cam
Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Planning Assistant Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0
Dear Ms. Kapusta: Re:
Application for Minor Variance MV-38-17-S (Erdman) Lot 27, Concession 10; 5137 Robert Hogan Lane Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Dog Lake
The Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for minor variance, and provide the following comments for the Committee of Adjustment’s consideration. The site was visited by CRCA staff on August 29, 2017. Summary of the Proposal The proposal involves the re-construction of a deck and renovations to an existing dwelling on the subject property. The variance is requested to:
Reduce the required setback from the high water mark from 30 metres, as required by Section 5.8.2.(1 .) of the South Frontenac Zoning By-law, to 16.15 metres. 0
Site Description The property is located on north shore of Dog Lake. The topography of the property can be described as a 7 metre high slope adjacent to the water and then rising slowly toward the location of the existing dwelling on the property.
The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Of?cial Plan and zoned ‘Limited Service Residential Waterfront’ (RLSW) in the implementing Zoning By-law
in One §“iI’l-“iI‘0I1II]€‘l’1’[
Wor§<iL11g'1)gcther
Parks (“Zan»adaE??ideau
Canal
Mé_13~2é¥.3>-719“?
(?c:«nserva1ti(%1n Authoriw E(‘?2atarac13_ixi Region tionservatian Aulh{) Rideau \i’alie1:
$1.3-5:9‘?-35?‘
bl3-546-4228
rity
Page 49 of 54
Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-3 8-17 -S) September 8, 2017
The main interests of the RWDRT in this application are the avoidance of natural hazards associated THHI?h?H’?lH¢?17ITHTl:dhqg1LII5aLIrllru1i-&::I:nf$.udh.m1Hjd.td. the shoreline of Dog Lake, the protection of the water quality of the lake, and the conservation of with ?JLE:i:I|‘nEh:uIIi?jllrp?ndimnELkw:h’mJ5|5cfLkhl;m£?:-nltvmmcf the cultural and natural heritage and scenic values of the Rideau Canal National Historic Site and UNESCO World Heritage Site. J’-‘FuI’I.J[EI.lH Natural Hazards Flooding: maximum recorded water level for Dog Lake is 98.95 metres geodetic. For I:‘I:I’l.1n;|LIL|:. T3:n?IE:L::n:I.:d-nJnIh’|rI?5::|:I:L£::u§lH3|.‘5:uhnpud:E.L Dog Lake, FIIIII-E The 1’h|:II.‘HI_‘I|.‘IIIi’:I.IuI.hI’— the highest recorded water level is used in lieu of an engineered ?ood plain. The ‘inH.[E:i.rn:u’LnLIi.u|n’:i.u’.?hbJL|!’:nu’.p.::r:d?a:-f.|i.m. CRCA’s Guidelines
for Implementing Ontario Regulation 148/06 (see description below) requires that all development be E:t:¢lmm:th;LhEnl@.&m|H.1H|l:?:z’rph:nhLblj|Tq=-h:?|dn?‘f’ut‘u set back a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory ?oodplain of a waterbody. ‘|=|.I.|.I:|1.pI:uI’.¢||I.?.:.|:. Based upon elevation 2iII:u’u’:utrE?:n?-HTm:hln’;IJ.u’r:.I?rr.q;iJJIrfLlu.:Iir.ty data and mapping site the proposed be located outside observations, development will of the setback WqT?[I’iUllldH?HHhH.¢?FE{|H?I1HHhp??1FMt¢H?IH-mii?afdrhl-i from the regulatory ?ood plain. Erosion: Section 5.8.2 (2) of the Zoning by-law requires that no building or structure or septic tank h1&I:3::HmJ.3JI?|:d’E:i:1$;h3-;Ir:q’=IlldmbnJ¢ujuin:mIa’I.q:LmH’ installation shall be located within 15 metre horizontal of the top of bank of any embankment, the slope 1J.ht:nIhLLb:h:?.dm&u|JI’n:h1rn’JnhJrE?l1pMrutnfnynfuhT-m?n?qfi of which is greater than 30% from horizontal. IET|EFJ.[?|r|.u1uI1rdIl|!|ln.1p’i.;.T|;.:qj|j.?.h’.;.[.|.;.[ CRCA policy de?nes the extent of potential erosion :|:’l’|‘I:lul|’:lh’tI:I’l2|‘I|i!1’I’nI.I’I’|II§I. hazards to include an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance for bedrock shorelines of unfh?ll?a?u-II-rummrmu-Hmnan?litgluh-H-??rbphdnh.rdhncr l(h):l(v), plus an erosion access allowance of 6 metres. Based H-II:I|’.I.I:I:L:i.’::?.:I:|I’:n.-h’|:h’.?IJ-:I|:Ir..lh.’ on an estimated 7 metre high slope, the 1|:h:I1[¥’:LjI|‘lI?l?2rIi’EIii.Ia:I-ILLrI:r:I:ILII’IIuI:E|‘I:I. total erosion hazard allowance is anticipated to be approximately 13 metres measured horizontally F.IHm:i-nL&nJ?Lm’:nuh=H::p:hJmbrI:pm:m:H.3’|3@bn::—.ndha’%l:.’ ‘:IiEI:::|En|::tIhht::I::|‘J:I|:II::|‘iI?:I’:i::|. !E:FF::::|th:|b.:’|:I’:|:nI.l|:|uII.Ii:I|:’nmI:||hl inland from the stable toe of slope at the shoreline. Staff note that the proposed development will be located outside of the erosion hazard allowance as de?ned by the CRCA.
F.|:?-:I|.l.|: of the Zoning By-Law for Section 5.8.2 South Frontenac Township suggests that a 30 metre setback [|.lI2|f|:|:|I:I.II.|:|:’:|.|.:E|_–L.I1F’rLI:I.|::.|.:T|:-II:&|:III.jIE|’.h:|I.]-|I|:|:-:h’|.-ltzl: 5-IEIIJIIIIIEI 5.3.3‘(1.) the high water mark is required to be maintained as a buffer in order to protect water quality. Thu. from Euullr1i]hn:h’mnihrq’:EuJbbr:i.d:m£nIbd’E::u:h’Lbp=h-|n’:h’u.??1 The Of?cial Plan also requires that this buffer area be maintained as a natural vegetative buffer strip adjacent i}End3bIllIrq’:Eu’i?.‘hIhJE’uuHm.:u¢.1llutniu’%’nb:Hw.?1}lquI: to the water’s edge to ?lter pollutants from runoff. ::|E|lIII:t:|:“I::|.ptn.|‘I’.’t:I’|:I:I%b::In.I’uH.
Similarly, the CRCA Planning Policy recommends that new development and site alteration, including 5WlUTf.?lTH|1¢HIli1lP¢1fIr¢D:dd?bi’tiH#IH1’i-:¢E?1?Hikdhiil.=J?q septic system tile ?elds and open or enclosed decks/patios attached to the main dwelling, be set back a lI?£+3’H£?r5?.IIuJc1uam?.I2IDJIlDi1’|?.hIdhi:ILbE:1$dndh‘brd'1EL minimum distance of 30 metres from the high water mark of a waterbody. J’LnII-.-.’:I’.:I.I’III-:|u|.’|I:|q::|‘j ::E:Eu.:nIi.l2n:I:uT3I?::l:uII1:LlJ:h’.?ri.u’:nIELd’lI?n’b::|1. However, new development the water setback may be considered when there are no reasonable alternatives for locating the within riELlh:n’d:l?I:Ennh:nn?u’:dnhnEn1n1:§rmln.?LnIm’LIL-u-‘h’h$1l?1 development outside of the water setback area, the development is no closer to the water than existing :hI.’:I:II;:nl::::ndla11’uI’:-‘I.ltId:n’-,EIldl.Iiq:‘I.d u.r.I’.:lnI.rL:-?rI.’nl’r|’.I.r..p|p;|I,|_ buildings or structures on the property the development complies with the maximum lot coverage hJl1h.pwnI.:n:–:.?lFq’-1’r1u.In’H?utu’n.;J|urIj’.:IlwqILug |u;uI;.;..:.-,-g._I._of the Zoning By-law, and suitable methods to minimize negative impacts on water quality provisions pTMb?rf?¢?£riI¢FI}HI.?r!HJ’£4InIhhiHHhi:i;tM??~tH:¢-Jun:-qdju are incorporated into the development. I-lllvnl-2|-I1-|!Il1-I-I-:|lH-.||:I:-:–J-I.–:i-.-pun:-:|:I.
:
.
.
.
E.| Rideau Canal NationalI.Historic Site and UNESCO World I Heritage Site E:?h|y.lWlJ11’hHI:rn:p'1’a1m£Ihrnth:uJtn?I1.¢1JnduIJ:u?lu.¢T?l Similarly, RWDRT staff strive to preserve and enhance the cultural, natural and scenic values of the national historic site and world heritage site so that all Canadians can enjoy this legacy into the future. I.nI’I’lJ’h?:I’|n::|‘I:n:|I:’|:||I’h:I.iun:?|.:II.fJ’.|?.-ILH.-|a!.‘1u’hp:|.h1.3I1.¢.ru;|’¢._ This can be achieved through the maintenance of a natural shoreline, the maintenance and enhancement THi?i’-hh**HId1HH?‘Fl?H?Ei?¢H$£i?HH.M.¢?li??hhI-#1-If-:.ImIn! of vegetation on the property, development which complements the visual character of the landscape, ?r¥’¢jIHm’Hj?pi|5.dr-u.?.u=lwH.hw=p|-=Iilkuh?hI.hHllrln&lqIL. and the maintenance of a minimum 30 metre setback of all development from the water. hdlhm:h1I&.ruIn:u:mI.u.3]::t:dh:EnE?I:H.‘ri:Im:?.E=lh:‘rin’.
Page 50 of 54
Page 2 of 3
Ms. Jennie Kapusta (MV-38-17-S) ‘I’—“lJ1”‘1 September 8, 2017 ‘P-
The proposed development is encroaching further into the water setback than the existing dwelling. RWDRT sta?’ Therefore, fI’—’ -IPII HHHcannot support the application. Recommendation staff recommend denial of application MV-38-17-S based on our consideration for RWDRT fT—IuI-ITIuI—IJuI{uI1I1TuEIILjI—:j|j1 natural I?n ?u“ natural and cultural heritage, and hazards, quality and quantity protection ull Water policies. -uI—I—’-I?-I—-‘E-‘I—JI£-‘II-1-
Parks Canada FIJI-I-L
—‘j-I——I-all in-Water and Rideau Canal Of?ce I-IJ—— oversees —I-I:I— shoreline works 2 1|-2-Halong the Canal ‘–13system. “I1jI—TI’I”‘I’II’I—’—‘1——-1’—I—hfIIn’I-:II& the landowner If wishes to carry out any in-water or shoreline works in the future, the Rideau Canal Of?ce must be contacted and Written approval obtained prior to the commencement of construction.
CRCA’s Ontario Regulation 148/06 .-I.-.-.r—|.|..:|.l.l. .|.IlIj Please note that a portion of the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, .-—.I|JuI|.I.|..||.r.|.-.-.|..|I.I|.|.|.l..| —’:I—–’-I—rI—I-I-I-I–I—I-I—I-I-.-l.II|.-.jl.rI Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by —.-I. the CRCA. The of the regulation I-I–I. purpose is to ensure that proposed changes (e. g. development and site …|.|I.-:r..|.|.-...||_- alteration) to not affected by natural property are as ?ooding and erosion, and 1’f—’ PICI-‘I JIITE hazards, such IJuL—-—J IJIJ the I aII’—‘I I-I-I-L I-I that changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. Within a regulated area, written 1-J-IJ1JI—uI——LuTJ?JZ—?-I1 permission obtained from the CRCA prior to development taking place. must be “II
Please inform this of?ce of any decision made fIJ——LI—-——-’–I-I: —LI-I-by the Committee —1I— with regard to this application. -E—’—’-11-1I— ‘1If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 244, or by e-mail at I1I—ZfI’I’fIIT-—’-I2II’I’II-I—-— I’I’I1—u 1&1 aschmidt@crca.ca Yours truly,
Andrew Schmidt, C. Tech. Supervisor, Development Review /as
3
c.c.
|.|.| .|.II|.-.l_r-_ |:.l.. Mark and Christine Erdman, 5137 Robert Hogan Lane, See1ey’s I’I l.|_|l..I Bay, ON, KOH 2N0 Parks Susan Canada (Via email) Millar, ‘-I-I-.1–lrlr -I-l-—Lindsay Mills, Planner, Township of South Frontenac (Via email)
Page 51 of 54
Page 3 of 3
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC MEETING Report Date: September 8, 2017 Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
MV-39-17-S Paul McKercher Concession 2, Lot/Part Lot 22, Sandstone Court, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: To vary section 5.24.2 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 to permit construction of an accessory building in front of the main building Date of Hearing: September 14, 2017
RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee hear comments from members of the public and that the minor variance to permit construction of an accessory building in front of the main building be considered for passage.
BACKGROUND The subject land consists of 3.78 +/- acres with frontage on Sandstone Court and Collins Lake. The property is currently developed with a single detached dwelling. The proposal is for the construction of an accessory building between the existing dwelling and the public road in the defined front yard. The proposed location is outside the 20m required setback from the road at a distance of 40m and will be screened from the road by trees. The Planning Department is able to support the application.
FOUR TESTS OF A MINOR VARIANCE Section 45(1) of the Planning Act A variance may be authorized from the provisions of the zoning by-law, if, in the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the request meets all of the following tests:
- Is the minor variance desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the official plan maintained?
- Is the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law maintained?
- Is the variance minor? Current Zoning: Residential (R) Application Complies with Zoning: Yes Current Official Plan Designation: Rural (RU) Application Complies with Official Plan: Yes
AGENCEY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Comments from KFL&A Public Health were not required.
Page 52 of 54
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Comments from Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority were not required. The building department has no objections.
CONDITIONS
- This minor variance is for the construction of a detached accessory building to be located a minimum of 40m from the front lot line of 12 Sandstone Court.
- Minor variance MV-39-17-S is applicable only to South Frontenac Township Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2003-75 and not to any subsequent zoning by-laws.
- A building permit is required for ALL demolition and construction on the property. There shall be no additional development, or demolition of existing structures, on the property without approval from the Township of South Frontenac.
ATTACHMENTS Map of McKercher Property Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills
Prepared by: Jennie Kapusta
Page 53 of 54
MO R
EL A
ND
-D
IXO N
RO
AD
MCKERCHER MV-39-17-S
DS TO NE
CO
UR
T
µ
3791 Moreland-Dixon Road
SA N
Legend McKercher Property McKercher Proposed Shed Existing Buildings
12 Sandstone Court
Collins Lake
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
15 Sandstone Court
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Page 54 of 54
Scale 1:1,344 0
5 10
20
30
40 Meters
UTM Projection NAD 83
