Body: Committee of the Whole Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee of the Whole Date: September 10, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of the Whole/2019/Committee of the Whole - 10 Sep 2019 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
TIME: DATE: PLACE:
7:00 PM, Tuesday, September 10, 2019 Council Chambers.
Call to Order
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
Approval of Agenda
Scheduled Closed Session - n/a
Recess - reconvene - n/a
Public Meeting - n/a
Delegations
(a)
Ron Hipfner, re: Garbage Pickup
Reports Requiring Direction
(a)
Bill 108 Presentation
4 - 15
(b)
Applewood Condominium - Removal of Holding Zone
16 - 19
(c)
Long Term Financial Plan Update
20 - 24
Reports for Information - n/a
Rise & Report from Committees of Council
(a)
County Council
(b)
Arena Board
(c)
Police Services Board
(d)
Portland Heritage
Information Items
(a)
Geoff Rae, General Manager, CRCA, re: Review of DRAFT 2020 Budget (The 2020 to 2029 Capital Forecast is available upon request)
25 - 28
(b)
City of Kingston - Proposed Amendments to Official Plan & Zoning By-laws
29 - 30
3
Page 2 of 30
Notice of Motions
Announcements/Statements by Councillors
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
Closed Session (if requested)
Adjournment
Page 3 of 30
Bill 108: More Homes, More Choice Act Presentation to Committee of the Whole September 10, 2019
Page 4 of 30
BACKGROUND • Bill 108 is designed to support growth by increasing the supply of housing that is affordable and provides Ontarian’s more choices on where to work, live, and raise families. • Looks to amend 13 different statutes, making major amendments to: • Planning Act • Development Charges Act • Ontario Heritage Act • Amendments to LPAT
• Introduced May 2, 2019 • Royal Assent June 6, 2019 • Majority of Changes to the Planning Act took effect on September 3, 2019
Page 5 of 30
Bill 108‐ More Homes, More Choice Act Proposes to amend 13 different statutes, with major impact on municipal planning, making legislative changes specifically to: • Planning Act
• Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act
• Conservation Authorities Act
• Occupational Health and Safety Act
• Development Charges Act
• Workplace Safety and Insurance Act
• Education Act
• Ontario Heritage Act
• Endangered Species Act • Environmental Assessment Act • Environmental Protection Act • Cannabis Control Act • Labour Relations Act
Page 6 of 30
PLANNING ACT CHANGES • To make changes to the Planning Act to help increase the supply of housing and streamline development approvals • Effective September 3rd, Bill 108 shortens timelines to approve applications: • Official Plans: 210 to 120 days; 90 day reduction • Zoning By‐laws: 150 to 90 days; 60 day reduction • Plans of Subdivision 180 to 120 days; 60 day reduction
• If applications are not approved within these timeframes, the applicant can appeal to LPAT to make a decision. LPAT hearings are back to being denovo hearings. • Requires OP and ZBLs to permit additional residential units in both the dwelling and detached accessory building for detached, semi detached, and row houses. Page 7 of 30
PLANNING ACT CHANGES • Appeals of decisions on draft plan of subdivision applications including any conditions imposed by the approval authority cannot be filed by any person who made prior oral and/or written submission. • Only certain stipulated persons can make such appeals, such as electrical utilities in local municipalities. • This change eliminates certain third party appeals of decisions on subdivision applications.
Page 8 of 30
COMMUNITY BENEFIT CHARGES AMENDMENTS TO S.37 & PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS • Goal: to make costs of development “more predictable” • Proposed Date of Transition: January 1, 2021 • Before passing a CBC by‐law, municipalities required to prepare a community benefit charge strategy • Proposed to be a percentage to be set by the province, similar to current cash‐in‐lieu of parkland • Annual reporting on Community Benefits
Page 9 of 30
COMMUNITY BENEFIT CHARGES AMENDMENTS TO S.37 & PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS • Exemptions from the Community Benefits Charges
• Long‐term Care Homes • Retirement Homes • Universities and Colleges • Memorial Homes, clubhouses, or athletic grounds of the Royal Canadian Legion • Hospices • Non‐profit housing
• Excluded Services for Community Benefits Charges
• Cultural or entertainment facilities • Tourism facilities • Hospitals • Landfill sites and services • Facilities for the thermal treatment of waste • Headquarters for the general administration of municipalities and local boards
Page 10 of 30
COMMUNITY BENEFIT CHARGES AMENDMENTS TO S.37 & PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS • Appraisals • Owner pays charge under protest, has 30 days to provide appraisal to municipality of value of land • If municipality disputes, has 45 days to provide appraisal to owner of value of land • If this appraisal differs by more than 5%, the owner can select an appraiser from the Municipal List, whose appraisal must be given within 60 days • Any difference between the value determined by the third party appraisal and the community benefits charge is to be refunded to the owner
Page 11 of 30
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT • Types of Development Subject to Development Charges Deferral • Rental Housing Development • Non‐Profit Housing Development • Institutional Development • Industrial Development • Commercial Development
• To propose a Period of Time of Development Charge Freeze • 2 years • Provides municipalities to charge interest during deferral and freeze periods, from the date application is received • Rate set at the earliest of either the zoning by‐law amendment or the site plan application. • The development charge is still payable at the time of building permit Page 12 of 30
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT • Additional Dwelling Units • Regulation amended to prescribe units to be created within ancillary structures without triggering development charges • 1 additional unit would be exempt from development charges
• The recently approved development charges by‐law passed by the Township (By‐law 2019‐48) has already included this change
Page 13 of 30
ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT • Council to provide notice within 30 days of decision to list a property on Heritage Register • Owners able to object Council’s decision to put a property on the heritage register • Council will be required to consider any objection and make a second decision to either confirm or remove the listing • Council must provide additional notice to the owner within 90 days of its decision. • There is no specified time limit for objections by the owners • Decisions on designation and alterations to heritage properties can now be appealed to LPAT. LPAT decision are binding. Page 14 of 30
LOCAL PLANNING AND APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT (LPAT) • Return to De Novo Hearings (back to the OMB rules) • Extending the grounds of decision made by LPAT • Return to the rights of examination and cross‐examination of witnesses at hearings • LPAT may has power to limit this if satisfied in the matters
• Limit’s non‐parties ability to participate in Planning Act appeals • Only KEY PARTICIPANTS may appeal OPAs
• Some Bill 139 amendments remain • i.e. cannot appeal a decision of the Minister
Page 15 of 30
Page 16 of 30
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
September 10, 2019
REPORT DATE:
September 5, 2019
SUBJECT:
Intention to Remove Holding Zone Applewood Plan of Condominium
RECOMMENDATION: This report be received for information. BACKGROUND: As a condition of draft approval, the lands included within the Applewood plan of condominium were rezoned in 2015 to establish the current zoning of the lands (RLS-6-H; RLSW-99-H, RLSW-100-H and RLSW-101-H). The rezoning occurred before the developer had entered into a Condominium Agreement with the Township; therefore, a holding zone was placed on the property. The purpose of the holding zone was to ensure there was no development on the units within Applewood prior to the developer entering into the agreement with the Township. The Township and the developer entered into a Condominium Agreement on May 16, 2016 and registered it on the title of all the lands within the Applewood Condominium on May 27, 2016. Since May 2016, several building permits were issued for residential dwellings which have now been constructed on units within Applewood Condominium. It has recently come to the developers’ attention that while the Condominium Agreement was entered into and registered on the lands within the condominium, the holding zone was never removed from these lands. The holding zone is required to be removed before any additional building permits can be issued within the Applewood Condominium. The developer (Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation & 1324789 Ontario Inc.) has applied to the Township to remove the holding zone from the lands they currently own. The Township is also proposing to remove the holding zone from the units where building permits have already been issued for the construction and occupancy of residential dwellings within the Applewood Condominium. This by-law amends Zoning By-Law 2003-75, of the Township of South Frontenac. Mapping showing the location of the lands to which this by-law applies is attached. In accordance with the regulations under the Planning Act, this notice of intention to pass the removal of a holding zone is only circulated to owners of property within Applewood Condominium. No public meeting is required to be held. The application and the associated by-law to remove the holding zone is scheduled to come before South Frontenac Council at the September 17, 2019 Council meeting for a decision. A notice of decision will be circulated once South Frontenac Council has made a decision on removing the holding zone. Appeals can only be filed by property owners should Council decide not to remove the holding zone.
1 Our strength is our community.
Page 17 of 30
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Regular staff time to prepare notices, review the application and prepare reports. Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation has submitted a complete planning application and associated fee. The holding zone on lands owned by individuals where building permits have already been issued shall be removed by the Township through its authority under the Planning Act to initiate a rezoning application. ATTACHMENTS: Map of Applewood Plan of Condominium Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Remove Holding Zone Submitted by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services Approved by:
Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer
2 Our strength is our community.
Areas to be Rezoned to Lift the Holding (H) Symbol from the Site Specific Zones LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL (RLS-6-H) LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL - WATERFRONT (RLSW-99-H) LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL - WATERFRONT (RLSW-100-H) LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL - WATERFRONT (RLSW-101-H) rth No
Z-19-10-L
or Sh eC
rth No
Rd
Loughborough Lake
r
ke La
e sid
MAGNETA WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & 1324789 ONTARIO INC
Rd
APPLEWOOD LANE, BALSOM LANE, JUNIPER LANE Duff Rd
e or Sh
Legend
Loughborough Lake
ple Ap
w
L ood
Property to be Rezoned
n
Frontenac_Roads_Aug1… Waterbody
Loughborough Lake
Wetland i Jun
Ln per
Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2015.
Keir Rd
d
il O’Ne
Ln
µ
Scale 1:7,193 0
37.5
75
150
225
UTM Projection NAD 83
300 Meters
Page 18 of 30
R Perth
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Page 19 of 30
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2019-XX BEING A BY-LAW TO REMOVE THE HOLDING “H” SYMBOL FROM THE ZONING MAP OF ZONING BY-LAW NO. 2003-75 AS AMENDED, PART OF LOTS 20 & 21, CONCESSION V, DISTRICT OF STORRINGTON, VACANT LAND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM NO. 76: APPLEWOOD WHEREAS, a Holding ‘h’ Symbol has been applied to the zoning on the subject land described as Part Lots 20 & 21, Concession V, Storrington District, Vacant Land Plan of Condominium No. 76, Applewood Plan of Condominium to be removed by by-law to permit development only when a Plan of Condominium Agreement between the property owner and the Township has been entered into and registered; AND WHEREAS the Plan of Condominium Agreement has now been prepared to the satisfaction of the owners of the subject land and the Township and registered on title of each of the units; AND WHEREAS the owners of the subject land have requested that the ‘h’ be removed on the subject land; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
- THAT the Holding “h” Symbol be removed from the land zoned Special Residential Limited Services (RLS-6-H) and Special Limited Service Residential – Waterfront Zones (RLSW-99-H; RLSW-100-H; RLSW-101-H) on Schedule ‘C’, the zoning map of Zoning By-law No. 2003-75, for those lands shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “1”.
- THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 36(1) of the Planning Act, 1990 either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 36. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 17th day of September, 2019. Read a first and second time this 17th day of September, 2019. Read a third time and finally passed this 17th day of September, 2019. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Ron Vandewal, Mayor Angela Maddocks, Clerk
Page 20 of 30
REPORT TO COUNCIL TREASURY DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE:
September 10th, 2019
SUBJECT:
Long range financial plan update & Budget direction
RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council direct staff to prepare the preliminary 2020 capital and operating budgets with a target increase of ___% based on the average phased-in taxpayer impact. BACKGROUND: The township has been using long range financial planning since 2015. For the 2013 to 2019 budget years, Council approved a budget with a 2.0% taxpayer impact based on average phase-in. The 2019 long range financial plan provided for a 2.0% taxpayer impact based on average phase-in and had an average reserve balance of $15 million with an ending balance of $14 million in 2028. A summary of the 2019 Long Range Financial Plan assumptions is attached to this report as Attachment A. These assumptions remain the same except where itemized in Table 1 below (and highlighted in attachment A). The listing below is a summary of updated or revised assumptions based on existing or anticipated service pressures or demands. The identified demands stem from meeting the expectations/requirements of Council, the public, committees, community growth, community partners and staff recommendations. Figures within the long range financial plan represent placeholders and not commitments to proceed. The operating forecast is primarily driven by inflationary increases, apart from the inclusion of additional staffing and roadside maintenance contracting throughout the term of the plan. Capacity for new or enhanced service needs or demands has generally not been incorporated. Some examples include the need for additional plowing of new roads or increased programming. Table 1 Change/Rationale
Dollar change over 10 year forecast 2020-2029
Operating Staffing
Changed from 2 staff to 2021 to 2 staff to 2026 and one staff in 2027 to 2029
+662,930
Garbage Collection
5% increase in 2020 and 2% ongoing
+238,552
Roadside Maintenance Outsourcing
$100,000 per year
Our strength is our community.
+1,000,000
Page 21 of 30
REPORT TO COUNCIL TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Capital Roads Construction
Updated to 2029
+3,826,500
PW – additional tandem cost
Updated to $350,000 from $300,000 and wording updated to “additional equipment”
+150,000
Landfill Closure
Updated timing and cost based on Cambium report
+8,849
Software and website upgrades
$45,000 per year based on 45 year refresh cycle
+450,000
Fire – New Recruits
$85,000 every 2 years for training, bunker gear and other required equipment
+425,000
Guiderail upgrades
$50,000/year
+500,000
Library
Building investment estimated in 2024
+1,000,000
Senior’s housing
In 2022 and 2027, estimated construction of one project is $3 million with $1.3 million upfront investment
+2,600,000
With these changes, below is a listing of scenarios summarized: Long range financial plan comparison - 2020 to 2029 Average phase-in taxpayer impact (Twp portion) 2.00% 2.25% 2.50% 2.75% 3.00% 3.25%
Estimated average Estimated Estimated $ reserve ending reserve impact /year value** value - 2029** (Twp portion) 11,920,569 7,340,325 $30-37 * 12,927,425 10,343,828 $35-43 13,717,516 12,697,589 $40-50 14,850,404 15,954,677 $43-55 15,990,658 19,253,692 $47-61 17,155,069 22,623,842 $51-68
2020-2029 Avg % Estimated Tax Rate increase range (%) 0.602381 0.62811 0.45% 0.602613 0.64367 0.69% 0.603906 0.65965 0.92% 0.605398 0.67593 1.17% 0.606831 0.69247 1.41% 0.608324 0.70951 1.66%
- steadily declining reserves ** average 6.5 million in operating reserves
Our strength is our community.
Page 22 of 30
REPORT TO COUNCIL TREASURY DEPARTMENT Below is a comparison of 2018 & 2019 residential tax rate for nearby municipalities: 2019 tax rate comparators (residential) South Frontenac Gananoque Loyalist Central Frontenac City of Kingston
w/ Upper Tier 0.602546 0.785274 1.303490 1.303490 0.724732 1.229478 0.894869 1.077597 1.112360 1.112360
2018 tax rate compators (residential) South Frontenac Gananoque Loyalist Central Frontenac City of Kingston
w/ Upper Tier 0.599794 0.778240 1.299785 1.299785 0.716053 1.220479 0.869315 1.047761 1.116375 1.116375
Using Loyalist as a comparator as the closest tax rate to South Frontenac, the estimated tax rate in 2029 under any of the scenarios summarized above would still be less than the current 2019 tax rate for Loyalist Township as well as all other comparators listed. For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending that Council consider a target increase of between 2.5% - 3.0% based on the average phased-in taxpayer impact. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – 2019 Long Range Financial Plan assumptions Attachment B – Reserve Listing Submitted/approved/prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer Approved by:
Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer
Our strength is our community.
Page 23 of 30
Attachment A Summary of assumptions from 2019 Long Range Financial Plan and updated for 2020 Assessment forecast: Phase-in: 1.5% Growth: 1.75% Operating • 2% inflation applied except: Insurance 5%, utilities/communications 4% and fuel 3% • Two positions from 2020 to 2026 and one position from 2027 to 2029, specific roles are unknown • Winter Control using 3 year average + 2% • Garbage collection 5% increase in 2020 and 2% ongoing (new tender and improved standards) • Roadside maintenance outsourcing - $100,000 per year • Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) at 0.5% yearly increase. Latest announcement is that structure will remain the same for 2020 but total dollars of allocations currently unknown. Capital (These represent placeholders in the long range financial plan and not commitments to proceed) • 2% inflation applied to all future years • OCIF funding to 2024 with 2% inflation (OCIF program currently under review) • Federal Gas Tax (County and Township) to 2029 • Fire, Public Works and Building vehicle costs are projected in a 25 year plan. For Fire, this also includes breathing apparatus, bunker gear and hose/appliances • Public Works - additional equipment every 3 years at $350,000 • Roads construction schedule incorporates a 5% increase per year including inflation. Includes Road 38 timing (2023/25) at 7.1 million and Arterial reserve of 1.1 million transfer from yearly Roads capital 2019-2022 • Base investment on facilities of $750,000 per year, $150,000 for parks and $25,000 for boat launches. • Base investment on various equipment of $150,000 per year. • OPP station upgrades over 2 years totalling $500,000. • New fire halls every 4 years beginning in 2021 valued at 2.0 million • Keeley Road improvements in 2019-2021 with a value of $1.5 million • Administrative offices in 2022 with a value of $2.75 million • Landfill closure costs for Loughborough 2026, Salem 2027 and Bradshaw 2028 • Re-designed intersections with an amount of $250,000 every 2 years • Various studies including development charges every 5 years, transportation master plan, recreation master plan, fire master plan, official plan Base investment in streetlights of $30,000 per year • Software and website upgrades/refresh every 4-5 years, $45,000/year • Fire new recruits every 2 years - $85,000 • Guiderail upgrades of $50,000 per year • Library – building investment of $1,000,000 in 2024 • Senior’s housing of 1.3 million in 2022 and 2027
Page 24 of 30 Attachment B Reserve Account Listing Capital Equipment and Infrastructure General Asset Investment Reserve Infrastructure Vertical Facilities/Property Recreation Rolling Building Dept Fire Dept Public Works Dept Linear Cemetery Lot Addition Roads Construction Reserve Funds Highway 38 Landfill Closure Obligatory Federal Gas Tax Development Charges Parkland
Operating Fiscal Stabilization
Reserve Fund
Working Funds Planning Policing Recycling Planning - Severance revenues Winter Control Fire - Wages Building Department Water Elections
Page 25 of 30 CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 1641 Perth Road, P.O. Box 160 Glenburnie, Ontario K0H 1S0 Phone: (613) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956-CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E-mail: info@crca.ca Websites: www.crca.ca & www.cleanwatercataraqui.ca
September 4, 2019
File: FIN 160 AA-026-19
Via E-mail
Ms. Angela Maddocks, Clerk Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street, P.O. Box 100 Sydenham ON K0H 2T0
Dear Ms. Maddocks, RE:
2020 CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY BUDGET – DRAFT FOR REVIEW
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Board has established a draft budget for 2020 and directed that it be circulated to member municipalities for review. The draft budget will be brought forward for approval at a CRCA Board meeting as early as December 2019. Attached you will find a summary of CRCA’s draft Operating Budget for 2020 (Attachment # 1), as well as a draft Capital Forecast for 2020 to 2029 (Attachment # 2). CRCA provides a wide range of programs and services that benefit eleven member municipalities. The Conservation Authority works with municipalities and other partners to protect life and property from flooding and other hazards, conserve lakes, forests and other natural resources, and enhance the health and quality of life of local communities. CRCA is mindful of the financial challenges faced by its member municipalities, and the ongoing review of the Conservation Authorities (CAs) program by the Province of Ontario. The Ontario Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks has requested that CAs look to their member municipalities to seek support for their budgets.
CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY LETTER AA-026-19 – 2020 CRCA BUDGET – DRAFT FOR REVIEW SEPTEMBER 4, 2019
Page 26 of 30 P a g e | 2 OF 2
In this context, all aspects of CRCA’s operation have been reviewed to reduce expenses and gain efficiencies. As examples, CRCA has optimized its vehicle and equipment fleet, and is transitioning to a more efficient and reliable shared services model for information technology. The draft Operating Budget reflects an overall 2.2% increase to the General Levy compared to 2019, no change to the Special Levies for properties or water control structures, and no change to user fees. Staffing cuts and changes to programming are required to achieve this budget. The draft Operating Budget will enable CRCA to continue to offer quality programs and services in a fiscally responsible manner. The apportionment of the General Levy to each member municipality is determined by the Province of Ontario. CRCA expects to receive the 2020 apportionment data from the Province by October 2019. Upon receipt of the data, staff will provide supplemental correspondence to indicate the anticipated amount of the 2020 levy to each municipality. CRCA would appreciate an opportunity to present the draft 2020 budget to Council in September, October or November 2019. Staff will contact your municipality to register as a delegation at an appropriate meeting. In the interim, if the municipality would like to discuss the Conservation Authority’s draft budget or any aspect of its program with our Senior Management Team and Board Members, we would be pleased to do so at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions about the above, please give me a call. Yours truly, (original signed by)
Geoff Rae, MBA, P. Eng. General Manager Attachments:
- CRCA 2020 Operating Budget – Summary (Draft for Review)
- CRCA 2020 to 2029 Capital Forecast (Draft for Review) Cc:
Mr. Mr. Neil Carbone, CAO/Deputy Clerk Ms.Louise Fragnito, Treasurer Councillor Alan Revill, CRCA Municipal Representative Councillor Ross Sutherland, CRCA Municipal Representative
Page 27 of 30
Attachment # 1 to CRCA Letter AA-026-19 (September 4, 2019)
Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority 2020 Operating Budget - Summary Draft for Review (August 28, 2019) CRCA 2020 Operating Budget (Draft for Review)
Revenues
MUNICIPAL LEVIES GENERAL LEVY SPECIAL LEVIES - PROPERTIES SPECIAL LEVIES - WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES TOTAL MUNICIPAL LEVIES
2019
2019
Budget
Year End Forecast
2020 Draft Budget
(Increase)/ Decrease
% Change
(2,219,516) (244,750) (89,650) (2,553,916)
(2,219,516) (244,750) (89,650) (2,553,916)
(2,267,958) (244,750) (89,650) (2,602,358)
(48,442) (48,442)
-2.2% 0.0% 0.0% -1.9%
TOTAL GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS
(8,000) (283,354) (291,354)
(215,091) (215,091)
(216,101) (216,101)
8,000 67,253 75,253
100.0% 23.7% 25.8%
AUTHORITY GENERATED FEES FORESTS ONTARIO OTHER RESERVE TRANSFER INTERNAL RECOVERIES TOTAL AUTHORITY GENERATED
(555,500) (250,000) (101,000) (89,200) (1,391,100) (2,386,800)
(551,770) (250,000) (166,508) (126,254) (1,391,910) (2,486,442)
(549,150) (253,750) (113,587) (170,550) (1,264,754) (2,351,791)
6,350 (3,750) (12,587) (81,350) 126,346 35,009
1.1% -1.5% -12.5% -91.2% 9.1% 1.5%
TOTAL REVENUES
(5,232,070)
(5,255,449)
(5,170,250)
61,820
1.2%
GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS FEDERAL PROVINCIAL
CRCA 2020 Operating Budget (Draft for Review)
Expenses
2019
2019
Budget
Year End Forecast
2020 Draft Budget
Increase/ (Decrease)
% Change
GENERAL MANAGER’S OFFICE 100: GENERAL MANAGER’S OFFICE TOTAL GENERAL MANAGER’S OFFICE
289,850 289,850
290,068 290,068
297,550 297,550
7,700 7,700
2.7% 2.7%
FULL AUTHORITY BOARD 150: FULL AUTHORITY BOARD TOTAL FULL AUTHORITY BOARD
10,000 10,000
11,652 11,652
10,200 10,200
200 200
2.0% 2.0%
CORPORATE SERVICES 200: CORPORATE SERVICES 205: HUMAN RESOURCES 210: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 220: FINANCE 230: COMMUNICATION 232: PUBLIC PROGRAMMING 235: EDUCATION TOTAL CORPORATE SERVICES
204,450 31,600 331,650 203,750 151,950 302,700 240,550 1,466,650
193,536 31,600 283,600 203,860 151,550 270,632 236,637 1,371,415
68,150 32,250 357,550 214,650 163,300 267,850 257,000 1,360,750
(136,300) 650 25,900 10,900 11,350 (34,850) 16,450 (105,900)
-66.7% 2.1% 7.8% 5.3% 7.5% -11.5% 6.8% -7.2%
CONSERVATION LANDS 300: CONSERVATION LANDS 310: OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 320: FORESTRY TOTAL CONSERVATION LANDS
221,350 502,100 270,750 994,200
222,405 446,015 283,056 951,476
239,450 351,350 276,350 867,150
18,100 (150,750) 5,600 (127,050)
8.2% -30.0% 2.1% -12.8%
1 of 2
Page 28 of 30
Attachment # 1 to CRCA Letter AA-026-19 (September 4, 2019)
CRCA 2020 Operating Budget (Draft for Review)
Expenses (continued)
2019
2019
Budget
Year End Forecast
2020 Draft Budget
Increase/ (Decrease)
% Change
CONSERVATION AREAS 331: LITTLE CATARAQUI CREEK CONSERVATION AREA (LCCA) 332: MAC JOHNSON WILDLIFE AREA (MJWA) 333: LEMOINE POINT CONSERVATION AREA (LPCA) 334: MARBLE ROCK CONSERVATION AREA (MRCA) 335: PARROTT’S BAY CONSERVATION AREA (PBCA) 336: OWL WOODS CONSERVATION AREA (OWCA) 337: GOULD LAKE CONSERVATION (GLCA) 338: LYN VALLEY CONSERVATION AREA (LVCA) 339: MARSHLANDS (MCA) 340: CATARAQUI TRAIL 350: MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTIES 352: BOAT RAMPS, ACCESS POINTS & DOCKS TOTAL CONSERVATION AREAS
113,500 103,150 181,100 2,600 50,950 2,700 64,700 15,900 17,100 31,500 25,550 31,200 639,950
114,304 105,823 183,000 2,400 50,980 2,700 64,700 15,600 17,400 36,725 25,550 31,400 650,581
109,000 61,700 177,100 2,600 50,950 2,700 27,400 15,100 16,300 33,250 26,500 31,800 554,400
(4,500) (41,450) (4,000) (37,300) (800) (800) 1,750 950 600 (85,550)
-4.0% -40.2% -2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -57.7% -5.0% -4.7% 5.6% 3.7% 1.9% -13.4%
FACILITIES 360: FACILITIES 361: LCCA OUTDOOR CENTRE 362: LCCA ADMINISTRATION FACILITY 363: LCCA WORKSHOP 364: COLD STORAGE 366: SUGAR SHACK 390: MJWA OUTDOOR CENTRE 391: MJWA WORKSHOP 392: LPCA WORKSHOP 393: LEMOINE POINT NATIVE PLANT NURSERY (LPNPN) 395: GOULD LAKE BARN TOTAL FACILITIES
15,000 72,700 49,000 17,500 1,900 1,950 9,650 7,750 17,500 11,000 1,250 205,200
15,000 70,750 47,009 18,400 1,950 1,947 9,650 8,950 17,500 11,096 1,250 203,501
15,000 74,700 56,000 16,850 1,550 2,050 8,850 6,700 17,500 11,500 800 211,500
2,000 7,000 (650) (350) 100 (800) (1,050) 500 (450) 6,300
0.0% 2.8% 14.3% -3.7% -18.4% 5.1% -8.3% -13.5% 0.0% 4.5% -36.0% 3.1%
TOTAL FLEET
113,800 113,800
168,100 168,100
138,450 138,450
24,650 24,650
21.7% 21.7%
WATERSHED PLANNING & ENGINEERING 500: WATERSHED PLANNING & ENGINEERING 510: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 520: ENGINEERING 525: WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TOTAL WATERSHED PLANNING & ENGINEERING
154,950 466,350 201,150 86,150 908,600
156,450 466,650 199,450 85,902 908,452
150,550 483,950 223,500 93,300 951,300
(4,400) 17,600 22,350 7,150 42,700
-2.8% 3.8% 11.1% 8.3% 4.7%
WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES (WCS) 531: SYDENHAM LAKE DAM 532: WILTON ROAD/ODESSA DAM 533: HIGHGATE CREEK CHANNELIZATION 534: LITTLE CATARAQUI CREEK DAM 535: TEMPERANCE LAKE DAM 536: MARSH BRIDGE DAM 537: LEES POND/FRED GRANT DAM 538: BROOME-RUNCIMAN DAM 539: BUELLS CREEK DETENTION BASIN 540: BOOTH FALLS DIVERSION TOTAL WATER CONTROL STRUCTURES
9,450 15,800 3,300 9,650 8,950 8,650 8,400 11,150 10,900 3,400 89,650
9,565 15,800 4,050 9,650 9,004 8,700 8,400 11,150 10,900 4,450 91,669
9,450 15,800 3,300 9,650 8,950 8,650 8,400 11,150 10,900 3,400 89,650
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
WATERSHED SCIENCE 550: WATERSHED SCIENCE 560: DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION TOTAL WATERSHED SCIENCE
169,350 164,520 333,870
170,869 158,550 329,419
179,650 159,400 339,050
10,300 (5,120) 5,180
6.1% -3.1% 1.6%
CORPORATE FINANCING 600: CORPORATE FINANCING TOTAL CORPORATE FINANCING
180,300 180,300
251,318 251,318
350,250 350,250
169,950 169,950
94.3% 94.3%
5,232,070
5,227,651
5,170,250
(61,820)
-1.2%
FLEET 450: FLEET
TOTAL EXPENSES
2 of 2
Page 29 of 30
Notice of a Regular Meeting Proposed Amendments to the City of Kingston Official Plan and the Zoning By-Laws Purpose and Effect of the Proposed Amendments: The proposed amendments are intended to enable additional opportunities for off-street parking in residential areas. The proposed Official Plan Amendment is intended to clarify that both new and existing low density residential development with at grade access will not have front yard parking except for parking in a permitted driveway as per the provisions of the zoning by-law. The proposed amendment to the zoning by-laws is intended to implement the above-noted amendment to the Official Plan, add or amend provisions related to driveway widths, and amend provisions related to the parking and storage of recreational vehicles, watercraft and trailers in residential zones. The Official Plan contains front yard parking policies for new residential development in Section 4.6.59 and for existing residential areas in Section 4.6.60. The intent of these policies is to preserve the character of existing neighbourhoods and maintain the designed character of new neighbourhoods. The proposed amendment to the Official Plan is intended to: • • • •
Consolidate the policies of Section 4.6.59 and 4.6.60 into one section; Clarify that both new and existing low density residential development with at grade access will not have front yard parking, except for parking in a permitted driveway as per the provisions of the zoning by-law; Remove the restriction that parking in a driveway is only permitted where the driveway leads to a permitted parking space in a garage, side or rear yard; and Separate out the criteria for the review of requests to establish front yard parking in Section 4.6.60 and add new criteria.
The proposed amendments to the zoning by-laws are intended to: • • • •
Clarify that for residential uses such as single detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings, row houses and linked dwellings, vehicles may not be parked in a front yard except in a permitted driveway (for conformity with the Official Plan policies); Add new provisions or amend existing provisions regarding minimum and maximum permitted driveway widths for residential zones; Permit tandem parking for residential uses that have at grade access in areas where it is currently not permitted; and Amend the provisions related to the parking and storage of recreational vehicles, watercraft and trailers in residential zones to remove the 72-hour time limit in a month for the temporary parking or storage of special vehicles and to regulate their temporary parking and storage on a seasonal basis.
The amendments would enable more consistent interpretation and application of the above-noted zoning provisions across the zoning by-laws. The proposed zoning by-law amendment affects Zoning By-Law Numbers 8499, 96-259, 97-102, 76-26, 32-74, 3077 and 8402. Key Map: The proposed amendments apply City-wide; therefore a description of the subject lands or a key map is not provided. Other applications: The City of Kingston has initiated a new City-wide Zoning By-Law (File Number: D14-043-2016). There are also many site-specific development applications within the City that are currently in process; for a complete list, please contact the Planning Division at 613546-4291, extension 3180.
Address of Property: Name of Applicant: City File Number:
City-wide The Corporation of the City of Kingston D35-004-2019
Page 30 of 30
Regular Meeting Date: Time: Location:
September 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. * Council Chambers, City Hall, 216 Ontario Street
- The Regular Meeting of the Planning Committee will commence at the conclusion of the Public Meeting portion which is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. Additional information about the application can be viewed at the office of the Planning Division at 1211 John Counter Boulevard, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, or by accessing the Development and Services Hub (DASH) at www.cityofkingston.ca/DASH. The address in DASH is shown as City Hall, 216 Ontario Street. Enquiries may be made by telephoning Sukriti Agarwal, Acting Planning Initiatives Manager, (613) 546-4291, ext. 3217. Written comments for or against this change may be sent to the Planning Division via: Mail: 216 Ontario Street, Kingston, ON K7L 2Z3 Fax: 613-542-9965 Email: sagarwal@cityofkingston.ca The Planning Committee will receive a recommendation report with respect to the applications at the Regular Meeting, which will be available to the public on the City of Kingston’s website at www.cityofkingston.ca/PlanningCommittee on September 13, 2019. The public is provided an additional opportunity to make oral submissions on the matter at the time the Committee considers the comprehensive report from staff at the Regular Meeting. The Committee will make its recommendation to City Council at this meeting. If a person or public body would otherwise have an ability to appeal the decision of the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kingston to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal but the person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to the City of Kingston before the proposed Official Plan Amendment is adopted or the by-law is passed, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to the City of Kingston before the proposed Official Plan Amendment is adopted or the by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to add the person or public body as a party. If you wish to be notified of the decision of the City of Kingston on the proposed Official Plan Amendment or the proposed zoning by-law amendment, you must make a written request to: City of Kingston, Planning Division 216 Ontario Street Kingston, ON K7L 2Z3 If you have received this notice and you are the owner of land that contains seven or more residential units, please post this notice in a location that is visible to all of the residents. If you are a person with a disability, and need City of Kingston information provided in another format, please contact customer service at 613-546-0000 or contactus@cityofkingston.ca.
NOTICE OF COLLECTION Personal information collected as a result of this meeting is collected under the authority of the Municipal Act, the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (MFIPPA), the Planning Act, and all other relevant legislation, and will be used to assist in making a decision on this matter. All personal information (as defined by MFIPPA), including (but not limited to) names, addresses, opinions and comments collected will be made available for public disclosure to members of the public, at the meeting, through requests, and through the website of The Corporation of the City of Kingston. Questions regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of this personal information may be directed to the Director of the Planning, Building and Licensing Services, 216 Ontario Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2Z3.
DATED: at Kingston Ontario this 30th day of August, 2019.
John Bolognone City Clerk
