Published December 13, 2016

Word Count 44187 words

Reading Time 208 min read

Body: Committee of the Whole Type: Agenda Meeting: Committee of the Whole Date: December 13, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Committee of the Whole/2016/Committee of the Whole - 13 Dec 2016 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA

TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

Presentation

(a)

Recognition of Service - Dan Bell

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Scheduled Closed Session -n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

(a)

Adam Rayner, re: Gun Range on Buck Bay Rd

(b)

Beverly Green, re: Concerns with taxation and sanitation charge

(c)

Curtis Tighe, Economic Development & Business Coordinator Municipal of Highlands East re: Fist Impressions Community Exchange Presentation

Reports Requiring Action

(a)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Selection of Council members for Committee Appointments

(b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Asset Management Plan

40 102

Reports for Information

(a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Planning Department Statistics: 20162017

103

(b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Park Model Trailer: Process to Amend Zoning By-law to prohibit them

104 105

Rise & Report

(a)

County Council

(b)

Arena Board

(c)

Police Services Board

Information Items

(a)

Sydenham & District Lions Club, re: Tree Lighting Ceremony on November 25

3 - 13

14 - 38

106

Page 2 of 106

Notice of Motions

Announcements

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Adjournment

Page 3 of 106

From: arayner@sutton.com [mailto:arayner@sutton.com] Sent: November-29-16 1:22 PM To: Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net Subject: RE: Committee of the whole December 13th Hi Wayne, Attached is my communication with the Chief Fire Arms Office as well as the letter I sent them as an attachment. I have also attached the lay of the land with my property and the neighbouring boundaries. I would like to appear before committee of whole on the 13th and look forward to answering any questions Thanks, Adam Rayner Sales Representative Sutton Group-Masters Realty Inc., Brokerage Direct (613) 572-1985 or Office (613) 384-5500

Sutton Master Platinum Award Winner 2014 & 2015 (Top 1% in Canada)
Sutton Platinum Award Winner 2010, 2011, 2012 & 2013 (Top 5% in Canada)
President of the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA) 2016
Director for the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA) 2013, 2014, 2015 www.adamrayner.ca NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain private, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, permanently delete this email and attachments, and destroy any copies. Any copying, use, disclosure or distribution of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is not authorized.

—–Original Message—-From: “Wayne Orr” worr@southfrontenac.net Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 4:05pm To: “arayner@sutton.com” arayner@sutton.com Subject: RE: Committee of the whole December 13th Adam, I am the right person to get in touch with about appearing before Council. Before we schedule you as a delegation, it would be helpful to understand the nature of the problem as well as where this is happening. Please feel free to either email some details or give me a call. Thanks

Wayne Orr Chief Administrative Officer Township of South Frontenac Box 100, Sydenham ON K0H 2T0 613-376-3027 Ext 2225 613-376-6657 (Fax) —–Original Message—-From: noreply@esolutionsgroup.ca [mailto:noreply@esolutionsgroup.ca] On Behalf Of arayner@sutton.com Sent: November-25-16 2:52 PM To: Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net Subject: Committee of the whole December 13th Hi Wayne, I was told I should contact you about talking at the next meeting on December 13th in regards to a gun range that is beside my home and about 40’ from my property line. The RCMP and Chief Fire Arms Office is not taking me seriously and it was suggested by staff in the zoning/planning dept that I appear before

Page 4 of 106

council can you confirm that I can do this and what time I need to arrive by Thanks, Adam Rayner 613-572-1985 ————————————Origin: http://www.southfrontenac.net/en/contacts/search.aspx?s=FyPlUsu3T0gFmsK0M722E7QtweQuAleQuAl ————————————This email was sent to you by Adam Raynerarayner@sutton.com through http://www.southfrontenac.net/.

Confidential: This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the email immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosing, copying, distributing or using the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited.

4L O.{ ,‘gesc]l’5 (/‘U;u{/\Q “l"* 0 r

Page 5 of 106 q,fl\>«\

RE: F|ear’s From: Sent: To: Cc:

Gun

Ran?e/Biick

‘*°

Bay Road Godfrey, Ontario

Niedermaier,Pete (OPP) Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:10 am

4-96‘b

C)WA/WV

‘arayner@sutton.com’ $id’s Mail (devriessid@gmail.com),Carol Bayne

image001.png (35.7 KB)

image002.png (35.7 KB)

imageO03.png (35.7 KB)

—

Download all

Mr. Raynor, The South Frontenac Shooting Club is now a CFOapproved club/range. it is in compliance with the Firearms Act and Regulations and the safety requirements of the Canadian Firearms Centre Range Design and Construction Guidelines. The Firearms Act does not provide a process by which a 3"’party can challenge a decision made under this Act. Questions respecting the Municipal approval granted to a range should be reviewed by contacting the Municipality where the range is —

located. Regards Peter

Peter Niedermaier Sergeant Supervisor of Shooting Clubs and Ranges

Chief Firearms Office Office: 705 329 5538 Fax: 705 329 5623

From: arayner@sutton.com [mailto:arayner@sutton.com] Sent: 23-Nov-16 9:37 AM To: Niedermaier, Peter (OPP) Cc: Sid’s Mail(devriessid@gmail.com);Carol Bayne Subject: RE: Fleafs Gun Range Buck Bay Road Godfrey, Ontario Hi,

Thanks for the email did someone come out and view the range? it is 20’ from my property line and 40’ to my fami animals with no rules for the club posted and limitedwarning you would be entering a shooting range. I would like to know the process of appealing this decision please and thanks.

Page 6 of 106 Thanks, Adam Rayner Sales Representative Sutton Group-Masters Realty Inc, Brokerage

Direct(613) 572-1985 or Of?ce (613) 384-5500 *

Sutton Master Platinum Award Vl?nner2014 & 2015 (Top 1% in Canada)

Sutton Platinum Award Winner 2010, 2011, 2012 & 2013 (Top 5% in Canada)

President of the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA)2016

Director for the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA) 2013, 2014, 2015

www.adamrayner.ca

NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain private, con?dential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, permanently delete this e-mail and attachments.and destroy any copies. Any copying, use, disclosure or distribution of this informationby a person other than the intended recipient is not authorized.

—-—OriginalMessage-—— From: “Niedermaier, Peter (OPP)” Peter.Niedermaier@opg.ca Sent: Monday, November 21. 2016 11:57am To: ‘“arayner@sutton.com”’ Cc: “Sid’s Mail (devriessid@gmail_com)"devriessid@gmail.com, “Caro| Bayne” <carol.ba ne

9caf.ca>

—

Subject: RE: Flear’s Gun Range Buck Bay Road Godfrey. Ontario Mr. Raynor,

Pursuant to Section 29 of the Firearms Act and the Shooting Clubs and Ranges Regulations the South Frontenac Shooting Club is now a CFO approved club/range. It is in compliance with the Firearms Act and Regulations and the safety requirements of the Canadian Firearms Centre Range Design and Construction Guidelines. —

Regards Peter

Peter Niedermaier Sergeant Supervisor of Shooting Clubs and Ranges

Chief Firearms Office Office: 705 329 5538 Fax: 705 329 5623

Page 7 of 106 Thank you for your email enquiry regarding the South Frontenac Shooting Clubwhich was sent to me at the Chief Firearms Office on 23August 2016.

The administration of inspection and approval of all shooting ranges in this Province is under the authority of Section 29 of the Firearms Act. The standard to which shooting ranges are inspected in Ontario is the standard set out in the Canadian Firearms Centre Range Design and Construction Guidelines, which were published in 1999. These guidelines provide the criteria for the safe design and operation of shooting ranges in Canada and are based on testing and input from a variety of international scienti?c sources and experts from the shooting community. The guidelines address indoor as well as outdoor ranges, and cover the full array of shooting disciplines and ?rearm speci?cations. Ontario’s Chief Firearms Office adopted the Canadian Firearms Centre Range Design and Construction Guidelines as of August 02, 2006. The objective of the Chief Firearms Officer of Ontario, in electing to employ the Guidelines, was to ensure public safety: by imposing rigorous standards respecting the design and use of shooting ranges, the Chief Firearms Of?cer is doing everything possible to ensure that no projectile would ever leave a shooting range and fall on property not owned by or under the control of the operator of that shooting range.

—

Publicsafety is the founding principle upon which the Firearms Act and the Canadian Firearms Program were enacted. Pursuant to Section 29 of the Firearms Act and the Shooting Clubs and Ranges Regulations the South Frontenac Shooting Club is in the process of becoming an approved range, the property is currently approved and operated as a private range. A Range Inspector from the CFOwill be sent to the site to ensure it is in compliance with the Firearms Act and Regulations and the safety requirements of the Canadian Firearms Centre Range Design and Construction Guidelines.

—

Regards Peter

Peter Niedermaier Sergeant Supervisor of Shooting Clubs and Ranges Chief Firearms Office Office: 705 329 5538 Fax: 705 330 4299

Page 8 of 106 From: arayner@sutton.com [mai|to:arayner@sutton.com] Sent: 23-Aug-16 9:05 AM To: Niederrnaier, Peter (OPP) Cc: arayner Subject: F|ear‘s Gun Range Buck Bay Road Godfrey, Ontario Importance: High Hi Sergeant Niederrnaier, I have attached my letter, a few diagrams of property boundaries and 4 pictures. Please note in the pictures that the longer grass between the two out areas is the property line between my property and the range. The one picture shows a wooden post in the center that is the side marker between my property and the range. The other picture shows a chair that is approximately where they have been launching the skeet from which is directly behind my property about 4‘ from the line. In two of the pictures you can see the skeet shooting machine covered in a small black tarp actually. I appreciate you reviewing this before you make a decision on the future of this shooting range.

Thanks, Adam Rayner Sales Representative Sutton Group-Masters Realty lnc., Brokerage

Direct (613) 572-1985 or Of?ce (613) 384-5500 *

Sutton Master Platinum Award Winner 2014 & 2015 (Top 1% in Canada)

Sutton Platinum Award Winner 2010, 2011, 2012 & 2013 (Top 5% in Canada)

President of the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA) 2016

‘

Director for the Kingston and Area Real Estate Association (KAREA)2013, 2014, 2015

www.adamrayner.ca NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain private, con?dential or privileged information. if you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, pennanently delete this e-mail and attachments, and destroy any copies. Any copying, use, disclosure or distribution of this informationby a person other than the intended recipient is not authorized.

Page 9 of 106

23/08/2016

RE: Flear’s Gun Range Godfrey, Ontario

Sergeant Niedermaier,

Thank you for giving me the chance to express some concerns about this licensed range. I have been monitoring the range since moving into my home in October 2014 I would like to point out a few items that i feel are strong arguments for the range to no longer be allowed to continue its operation. According to the Chief Firearms office rules for a licensed range the range rules must be posted at all times in a highly visible site (they don’t have any range rules posted). I have quoted the actual rules from your site: 5 The operator

of an approved shooting range shall ensure that the discharge offirearmson the shooting range does not endanger the safety of persons at the shooting range or in the portion of the surrounding area described in paragraph that (a) The design and operation

3(2)(a), by taking appropriate

measures, including ensuring

of the shooting range

(i) is such that projectiles discharged fromfirearms will not leave the shooting range if they are discharged there in accordance with the safety rules, and (ii) promotes

the safety of all persons on the shooting range, including by accommodating any adaptation that may be appropriate given the nature of the shooting activities that may take place and the type and calibre offirearms that may be used there; (Shooting skeet which they are not licensed for) (b) the shooting range has an adequate warning system to warn persons that they are entering a shooting range and to informthem, when such is the case, that shooting activities are taking place at

that time; (They only have one small sign as of4 days ago) (c) appropriate

safety rules for the shooting range are applied that are consistent with the nature

the shooting activities that may take place and the type and calibre of?rearmsthat may be used there; (No rules posted as of 23/08/16)

(d) the safety rules are posted in a conspicuous place on the shooting range; and (e) if more than one person is simultaneously engaged in shooting activities on the shooting range, a person acts as the range of?cer.

Page 10 of 106

I understood that the minimum distance between a range and a neighbouring property line was to be 200 meters? (This is what you had told me last year) The range is mere feet from my property line. I understood that this range isn’t even licensed for Skeet shooting according to your office and they have

been doing this a hand full of times. The skeet machine is visible from my property as of 23/08/16.I understand according to the rules that a range owner must immediately notify the Chief Firearms office of any changes to the immediate area that could affect its use? I moved in October 2014 and that immediately affected the use. 13. The operator

of an approved shooting range shall report immediately to the chieffirearmsofficer any change, other than one referredto in section 12,(a) to the shooting range or the portion of the surrounding area described in paragraph 3(2)(a) that could endanger the safety of any person. The previous owner of my home was Mr. & Mrs. Flear’s Sister in law and the family more or less shared access to the range. I know i am not able to be present

but whoever comes for the inspection please make note as to how close my property line stake is to the range in the south/westcorner, this is no longer a safe operation for this property and its immediate neighbours. I appreciate you taking the time to read my letter

Regards,

Adam Rayner 267 Buck Bay Road

Godfrey, Ontario KOH—lT0

Page 11 of 106 HOME

(‘adMad1ouse

‘

%OOM2ITLjljll

Welcame Adam SEARCH BY:

333 OF “mo REPORTS VIEWED

ADDRESS

POSYAL CODE/MUNlC|PALI\’V

ADDRESS RANGE

MPAC-PRopER.>:<.nJ€’ ‘~

NAME FIN

LRO/PROVINCE

Neighbourhood Sales

Property Details

Demographics

Plan List By PIN

IlNSTRUMENTIFLhN I smzer

sweet

FRONTENAC (13)

K?iweeomaesmwmsnouse LOGOUT FEED9“3K

LOTSCONCESSION

NAME

suns ::

BAYRD “BUCK

257

STREET vnzw

MAP VIEW

HEU: CENT“

search]

Aerial

ACTIVE] PIN 362430013

. Search By Black] Enhanced Report I Geowavehousa Land Registry Inforrnalinn - PIN: 352430013

Slure

’::;‘§::er

vs-W N/A

U10: 13 Area: 82,368 m2 Regmratlon Type: LT Perimeter: 1,458 rn PT LT 10 CON 1 BEDFORDPT 1, ]3R3998,’ SOUTl’lFRONTENAC

ACTIVE

Infomsation Assessment Roll Number

Ass&ment

m29o1uo4oaso1o

“Wm

, Ph3 sed

$5,500

Depth;

Assased Value based on January 1, 2012:

$5,500

PNDQNY TYPE? Z00 Farm pmperty without

2016 T3* Y

In AS

0 _DOA

Fruntage ;

0, DOA

any bulldlngs/slructurs

‘

[

M/\

LFC4

OUv\0’( ED QCLaw

WLQ

Ownevship

Assessmem

Mnnxmnahly

suogea?upe?y mseanm?ssull Adme-ss

Plan

Subgeu ARN

Lot/Con

vsu.,,w..m,.m, Neugmmumuoa Sale

Page 12 of 106 HOME

Welcome Adam 3:2 or man naroms vnzwsu

F SEARCH EV:

ZOOMZIT

Lijilljll

Mpnc-PRoPER.>r<_|rJ€’ ‘-

ADDRESS

ADDRESS RANGE

| NAME] PIN IINSTRUMENTIPLAN [ LOT&CONCE$$ION

POSTAL CODEIMUNICIPALIW LROsPROVINCE

WAm

FRONTENAC (13)

Progeny Damn;

Neighbourhood Sales

Demographics

Plan List By PIN

IUEW eeom.emw¢REHousE

smear $4

STREET NAME

267

BUCK BAY RD

MAP VIEW

LOGOUT FEEDBACK HELP

sum: 2:

CENTRE

Search] Aerial

STREET VIEW

7 NIAI NIA

ACTIVE| PIN 362430012 Search By Black 1Enhanced Repo? I Geawanahuuse Store

Land Registry lnfonnalion

—

5%-:9 - ‘%

rm: 351430012

._’

Municipatlly: Land Regmry Status:

N/A

Ara: 30,894 m2 Penmaer: 1,548 In PT 2, 13123998; Scum FRONTENAC

Registration TYDE:

PFW} §?m com-Lgg

Party To:

.-4-.-an

Assasment

Infonna?on

Assasm 5” t Roll

Number

: “awn?”

Assess

wzgowoaoosozo

v ,Pnased ASE“

$30 3, 00 a

Depth ;

Assased Value based on January 1, 2012:

$303,000

Property Tvoe:

2o16T In

0 00 A ‘

Frontage ;

Kw ]’V?

::3:

, D00 A

301 Smgle-famny aexacnea (noton water)

O/Vkk '

::;°.’:‘w

ACTIVE

PT LT o

Dmipzionr

2n-5 Tnzm»-1 Emery H9‘. m

Am: w u

Assessmeru

Mumcxpawy

QSearm Result

suluea Prope?v

Fran

Suhjed ARN

Lahcon

9 subject Pmpeny Nzhrvboumoodsale

Se.m :.

Page 13 of 106 Home

Welcome Adam

o:=moo REPORTS vxswzn

:34

SEARCH BY: posnu

ADDRESS RANGE

ADDRESS

MPAC-PRO!->ER‘>“.€ll@ ‘» l@WGeo\WrSE?lU&REHOUSE LOGOUT

NAME

| PIN | INSTRUMENTIFLAN| LOT&CONCESSlON

CODE/MUNICIPALITY LROPFROVINCE

raonremc (13) pmpeny Delsils

Neighbourhood Sales

Demographics

smezw

smear NAME

221

BUCK BAY ROAD

searchl

STREET VIEW

MAP VIEW

Plan Lisi By PIN

FEEDBACK HELP

CENTRE

surrs :4

Aerial ppmm

V’WE”"?‘ Q§7 Q

1N/A 2m'6 so ,, GODFREY Search

By E|ockyEnham-.911

Land Registry lnfonnau’on-PIN:

0,…”

ACTIVE] pm 352430015 Slam

~=Goog|e

Assament

Report | Geowarehouse

PrI’nla::::;er

352430015

60 KEY LRO: 13 Area: 60,5B6m2 ACTIVE Registration Type: LT P?irnael: L009In PT LT_9CON 1 BEDFORDfT 1, ER2402; SOUTH FRONTHMC

-A-0/aise2’=;2"é0.D=:=h?;é.4‘:é’:’=‘a:v,.E,:v+:sE.»ae~ Information

Assessment Roll Mamba

1o29o10o4oo4soo

2016 Tax Year, Phased

$135,000

Depth:

$135,000

Tyne: Pronettv

In ASSESSIIEIIIZ

Assezsea Value based on January 1, 2012:

Assssmenr

“mans 0.00 A

Frontage:

0.00 A

Farm with residence with or wimogtsecondary an:<tun=s; wanfarm 2n

09I?\EIS’|iD

éQ

m; w nu :03: 20:5‘

rwt En!Mr<w-«.

0‘

mo Addre»

API ‘..~mp;:‘.-1»

RSSESSMBN

Qseem: Result Plan

Munlcmamy

LN/COW

sumeaPmpeny QSuhpeu Properly Neughboumooa Sale s-mm:ARN

Tr-Hm r.» - war‘

c>x/‘H1)L!Li5’

{Kb,VLMQQ0ja“? /\ rx?awr S z>u7W\

H! OFQL ii‘/\9 ‘

South Frontenac Township Harrowsmith, Verona, Sydenham December 13, 2016

Add a picture here

Full Picture First Impressions Community Exchange Report Back from The Municipality of Highlands East Page 14 of 106

Before the Visit

One member familiar with Township, but not Sydenham Harrowsmith Magazine had a big impact on expectations – Idyllic country setting, barns, apple trees, rolling hills, cows in pastures Websites used: South Frontenac Township site, Wikipedia, Sydenham, County of Frontenac, Google maps streetview, twitter, ruralroutes.com, YourVerona.com and SydenhamVillage.com South Frontenac’s website was very helpful and easy to use Page 15 of 106

First Impressions Harrowsmith – very strange intersection, no parking signs on main street, very large church, no signage from eastern entrance, homes were nice and well kept, very clean hamlet Sydenham – Nice schools, nice new subdivision, town water, decent signage, difficult to determine business section, larger than expected, nice homes, clean area Verona – One main road, not much parking, lots of stores, very large Ford dealership, larger town than expected, very clean

Page 16 of 106

Entering the Community

Page 17 of 106

Entering the community Harrowsmith – Nice signage from south, north and west entrances, no sign on east entrance Sydenham – Not consistent signage, no sign on south entrance Verona – Decent signs from north and south, posters on north entrance Overall – Decent directional signage and nice signage for each town

Suggestions: Make signs consistent across township, update faded signage, don’t allow posters etc. on entrance signs Page 18 of 106

Housing and Residential Areas

Well kept homes, neat and tidy Many were located very close to the roads Some houses for sale, but not large numbers Nice retirement complex in Sydenham Felt housing was adequate from a first impression standpoint Nice sidewalks, trails, parks, and bike paths in residential areas Page 19 of 106

Local Government Services

Township office easily located in Sydenham Staff very polite, and greeted us immediately Staff education should be a priority Limited or no brochures on the area, business directories, or community profiles

Page 20 of 106

Education

Very large schools in Sydenham, nice school in Harrowsmith Easily found, very attractive

Page 21 of 106

Health clinic and chiropractor both available Police were in Sydenham on day of visit Several fire stations across Township Ambulance handled by County

Page 22 of 106

Downtown Appearance Harrowsmith – parking needs to be addressed, unusual intersection, vacant stores, no parking signs on main street Verona – parking needs to be addressed, narrow street, lots of stores, good mix, great information kiosk Sydenham – great parking, downtown not clear, nice mix Page 23 of 106

Downtown / Retail

Page 24 of 106

Retail and Services

Overall decent mix of businesses, friendly business operators, neat tidy

Page 25 of 106

Industry

Vacant industrial land noticed in Harrowsmith, no major industry noted

Page 26 of 106

Tourism

Major trails noticed Not many pamphlets or promotional materials Strength seems to be the history of the area No information centre noticed

Page 27 of 106

Entertainment and Recreation

Page 28 of 106

Culture and Heritage

Historical pictures in Tousdale’s general store and the Point restaurant Very large churches, beautiful old buildings

Page 29 of 106

Environmental Sustainability

Impressed with solar powered light on Verona sign Waste and recycling containers available throughout township Environmental sustainability mentioned in Strategic Plan

Page 30 of 106

Information from Residents

Residents very helpful, show pride in their community Overall very positive impression of their community No major concerns or negative comments

Page 31 of 106

Using your Senses

Food at the Point restaurant was excellent Gilmour on 38 had great butter tarts Smell of fresh clean air Everything was kept neat and tidy No unordinary sounds, overall quiet

Page 32 of 106

Five positive features about South Frontenac Neat and tidy 2) Beautiful buildings 3) Great looking schools 4) Great parks and green space 5) Great history and pride 1)

Page 33 of 106

Three potential opportunities for South Frontenac Harrowsmith had a lot of potential; remove no parking signs, address odd intersection, promote new business to fill vacant storefronts 2) Increase tourism promotion through promotion of history and heritage 3) Educate staff and public to promote other towns within Township/County 1)

Page 34 of 106

Five biggest challenges facing South Frontenac Proximity and dependence on Kingston 2) Lack of accommodators 3) Lack of industry 4) Unity of Township to support other towns 5) Attracting youth/young families 1)

Page 35 of 106

Thoughts What’s going to stick with us:

The tidiness, cleanliness, pride, and beautiful buildings What we’re going to steal:
The idea of having historic photos in businesses What will bring us back:
Gilmour on 38 and Tousdale’s General Store

Page 36 of 106

Quick Wins

Remove no parking signs in Harrowsmith Improve parking opportunities in Verona Communicate among towns and promote each other’s assets to keep people within the Township

Page 37 of 106

Thank you! Questions?

Page 38 of 106

Page 39 of 106

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED:

December 8, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

December 13, 2016

SUBJECT: Selection of Council members for Committee Appointments

RECOMMENDATION: Council is asked to confirm who is interested in what appointments so that the bylaw can come forward on December 20, 2016.

BACKGROUND: Further to the information report to Council on December 6, where Council members were encouraged to discuss amongst themselves who wished to serve on what committees, Council is now asked to provide direction to staff so that the bylaw may be presented for the meeting of December 20, 2016. Council policy sets out the Committee of Adjustment/Land Division Committee as being comprised of 8 members – one Councillor from each District, and one non-councillor from each District. The Planning Act requires that any non-council members of the Committee serve for the term of Council, but that Council members of the Committee be appointed annually. Current Councillors on the Committee of Adjustment: • Al Revill • Mark Schjerning • John McDougall • Ron Sleeth When Council appointed members to the Corporate Services and Public Services Committee there was discussion on revisiting the appointments half way through the term of Council. Current members of Corporate Services Committee: • Al Revill - Chair • John McDougall • Ross Sutherland Current members of Public Services Committee: • Ron Sleeth - Chair • Mark Schjerning • Al Revill As presented as part of the organizational review, once the new Manager of Development Services is hired Council will have the opportunity to establish a Development Services Committee.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 40 of 106

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council:

December 8th, 2016

Agenda Date:

December 13th, 2016

SUBJECT: Asset Management Plan Update RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information and will be brought forward for adoption at the December 20th Council meeting. BACKGROUND: In 2013, an Asset Management Plan (AMP) was first developed. RV Anderson was contracted with the assistance of staff to develop the assessment structure as well as the final document issued December 2013. This document was presented and adopted by Council at that time. The document was introduced to meet the provincial requirements under the Building Together – Guide for municipal asset management plans. The document is a requirement in order to apply for various funding including Federal Gas Tax and OCIF (both base and top-up). Also in April 2013, Council supported the purchase of an asset management software, Cartegraph. This software met the needs of both Treasury and Public Works and allowed the Township to move away from multiple standalone systems or spreadsheets. ANALYSIS: Although the main driver of putting together the original AMP was meeting the requirements of the Building Together Guide, asset management is an integral tool used by the Township in its capital planning. This AMP used the foundation built by RV Anderson in the first AMP and was updated by staff. Comparison In comparing the first AMP to the 2016 version, several changes and improvements have been made. This includes: • an initial listing of facilities • an updated inventory of storm sewers and manholes. The previous version only included the village of Sydenham. Further costs used in this version are based on Township historical data rather than industry estimates. • Updated inspection data which provides essential condition data • Updated decision matrix within Cartegraph to produce capital planning forecasts In comparing the statistics from the first plan to this version, some improvements can be seen. They include: • An increase of 16% of assets with a condition score of excellent • A 6% increase in the assets in the low to medium risk distribution. This means there are less assets in the critical range of medium-high to high. • Reduced financing needs in both the 10 year and 100 year forecasts

Page 41 of 106

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT Challenges/Differences The creation of the asset management plan is currently not fully integrated to Cartegraph, our asset management software. The current creation of the AMP is driven from the based data in Cartegraph but does not account for the full processes used within the software. The base data is currently pulled into a spreadsheet that is then driven by a risk matrix. The current AMP takes a like for like replacement approach and does not factor in upgrades or improvements made when an assets such as a road or bridge is assessed. It also doesn’t fully consider the impact and planning for pavement preservation strategies except for the condition rating given to an asset. In the regular capital planning, risk is factored however priorities are subcategorized and dollars are allocated within the sub-categories before projects are chosen. An example of this is that in the AMP, arterial roads have the highest consequence of failure and from strictly a risk based perspective would take priority over local and collector roads. However, in the current capital planning, dollars are sub-categorized between arterial roads, villages, local roads, local upgrades and pavement preservation which ensures that funds are allocated throughout the various priorities within the Township rather than just a risk based priority. Having said that, the schedules under Appendix B, are strictly risk based and although there are some similarities, the listing does not reflect the measures and processes used currently. Further, our capital planning process also incorporate smoothing out the year over year requirements to avoid large fluctuations and provides a more realistic approach to planning. Another difference is the structure of the financing strategy. The AMP looks at a 10 year and 100 year perspective. Excluding the water component, the document considers assets that are primarily funded from tax revenue and does not include other assets where reserves are used to fund capital projects. Examples of this are rolling stock such as Public Works and Fire Vehicles, facilities which are usually primarily funded from reserves. Comparing the financing strategy within the AMP compared to the long-term financial plan presented earlier this year, the long-term financial plan takes into account both reserve based and taxation based assets into its forecast. This is a limitation within the current AMP as it only provides a partial financial picture. Next Steps It is the intent that the next version of our AMP better matches the processes currently being used by fully incorporating the data and processes within Cartegraph as well as using the long-range financial plan as the driver to present financing strategy. We anticipate providing an updated AMP every 2-3 years and in the next few years, we will be working with the software consultant to fully obtain schedules from the software that incorporates our processes and funding models. We are also expecting that the facilities data will be fully incorporated and updated and other areas such as vehicles, streetlights will also be included.

Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer Mark Segsworth, PW Manager David Holliday, PW Supervisor

Page 42 of 106

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2016

Page 43 of 106 Township of South Frontenac

TOC 1-1

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

1.0

INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………1

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6

Provincial Guideline ………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Vision for Infrastructure in the Township of South Frontenac ……………………. 2 Goals of Asset Management…………………………………………………………………….. 3 Scope of Asset Management Plan…………………………………………………………….. 4 Development of the Asset Management Plan…………………………………………….. 4 Refinement of the AMP ……………………………………………………………………………. 5

2.0

STATE OF INFRASTRUCTURE …………………………………………………6

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Asset Inventory ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Asset Value …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Asset Condition ………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Asset Risk …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Refinements by Township Staff ……………………………………………………………… 14

3.0

LEVELS OF SERVICE ……………………………………………………………. 15

3.1 3.2 3.3

Condition Levels of Service……………………………………………………………………. 15 Capacity Levels of Service……………………………………………………………………… 15 Existing Levels of Service………………………………………………………………………. 16

4.0

ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY………………………………………… 19

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4

Asset Management Strategy Overview ……………………………………………………. 19 Managing Risk ………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Long Term Infrastructure Capital Investment Needs ………………………………… 22 Asset Management Strategies to Reduce Infrastructure Costs …………………. 24

5.0

FINANCING STRATEGY ………………………………………………………… 25

5.1 5.2 5.3

Sources of Funding ……………………………………………………………………………….. 25 Short Term Financing Strategy……………………………………………………………….. 25 Long Term Financing Strategy ……………………………………………………………….. 28

6.0

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………………. 31

Page 44 of 106 Township of South Frontenac

TOC 1-2

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Township of South Frontenac……………………………………………………………………… 1 Figure 2 – Asset Replacement Value Distribution………………………………………………………….. 6 Figure 3 – Distribution of Asset Condition ……………………………………………………………………. 8 Figure 4 – Preventative Maintenance Impact ……………………………………………………………… 10 Figure 5 – Risk Matrix …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Figure 6 – Distribution of Asset Risk …………………………………………………………………………. 14 Figure 7 – 10 Year Capital Investment Needs …………………………………………………………….. 21 Figure 8 – 100 Year Capital Investment Needs …………………………………………………………… 23

LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Inventory of Assets …………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Table 2 – Value of Assets by Asset Class ……………………………………………………………………. 5 Table 3 - Estimated Condition Based on Useful Life Remaining ………………………………………. 7 Table 4 – Value of Assets by Condition Score………………………………………………………………. 8 Table 5 – Probability of Failure Score………………………………………………………………………… 11 Table 6 – Consequence of Failure Score Information …………………………………………………… 12 Table 7 - Risk Score by Asset Value …………………………………………………………………………. 13 Table 8 – Typical Service Levels and Performance Metrics for Small Municipalities …………. 17 Table 9 – Renewal Strategy based on Risk ………………………………………………………………… 20 Table 10 – Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets)…………………………………………. 26 Table 11 – Short Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) …………………………….. 26 Table 12 – Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) …………………………………………. 28 Table 13 – Long Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) …………………………….. 29

LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A – Township of South Frontenac Map APPENDIX B – Information and Assumptions used to Develop Long Term and Prioritized Short Term Renewal Needs APPENDIX C – Sample Road Segment Decision Tree APPENDIX D – Detailed State of the Infrastructure Analysis

Page 45 of 106 Township of South Frontenac

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Municipalities throughout Ontario own a diverse portfolio of infrastructure assets that in turn provide a varied number of services to their citizens. The infrastructure, in essence, is a conduit for the various public services the township provides, e.g., the roads supply a transportation network service; the water infrastructure supplies a clean drinking water service. A community’s prosperity, economic development, competitiveness, image, and overall quality of life are inherently and explicitly tied to the performance of its infrastructure. Since 2013, the Province requires that any municipality seeking provincial capital funding for infrastructure projects prepare an Asset Management Plan (AMP) to demonstrate the need of each project within its social, economic or environmental priorities. This report represents the Township’s updated strategic AMP based on current infrastructure information. The asset inventory currently includes roads, bridges and culverts(over 3m)* , facilities, water treatment and storage facilities, water mains, and storm sewers. The Township currently owns and operates approximately $350 million of infrastructure, and other assets will be added to the plan as more data is gathered. For example, the inventory and figure does not include rolling stock. Like most municipalities across Ontario, a portion of assets are in poor or critical condition. These assets should be addressed on a priority basis. Over the next 100 years, the Township should spend an average of $8.3 million per year for asset rehabilitation and replacement. For water assets, there will be sufficient funds to cover capital expenditures through Water User Fees in the short term (10 years) and a shortfall of $290,000 over 100 years. Future financial plans will continue to monitor and ensure the sustainability of the water assets. Based on a 10 year forecast and looking at assets on a like for like replacement, the current Municipal Tax Levy is insufficient to finance forecasted expenditures in the short term for tax supported assets. However, strategies such as joint tendering and preventative maintenance are not yet reflected in this plan but are factored when using Cartegraph and developing Capital plans for budgeting. By taking a longer term view, over the next 100 years, the Tax Supported Capital Levy coupled with the use of Reserves is sufficient to finance AMP expenditures. The Township has taken a proactive approach in addressing infrastructure needs by setting aside reserve funds to minimize deficits and by investing in Cartegraph to better understand asset condition, risk and replacement needs. This strategy positions the Township on a path to sound asset management. *future references to bridges and culverts also only refer to culverts 3m or greater

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 46 of 106 Township of South Frontenac

Asset Condition

Asset Risk

Page 47 of 106 Township of South Frontenac

Risk Distribution Replacement Cost

Distribution

Low

Medium-Low

Medium

Medium-High

High

Roads

$288,461,000

81.2%

$90,163,000

$81,230,500

$40,225,000

$53,832,500

$23,010,000

Bridges & Culverts

$25,771,265

7.3%

$3,099,513

$15,207,265

$4,364,063

$2,396,225

$704,200

Facilities

$27,307,000

7.7%

$9,663,000

$1,892,000

$4,535,000

$9,717,000

$1,500,000

Water Facilities

$7,011,571

2.0%

$7,011,571

Water mains

$3,317,202

0.9%

$807,881

$2,509,321

Storm Sewers

$3,502,338

1.0%

$2,557,666

$212,809

$259,353

$472,510

Total

$355,370,376

100%

$106,291,059

$108,063,466

$49,383,416

$66,418,235

$25,214,200

29.9%

30.4%

13.9%

18.7%

7.1%

% of Total

Page 48 of 106 1

1.0

INTRODUCTION

This report represents the Township of South Frontenac’s updated Asset Management Plan (AMP), based on current data and information on the Township’s transportation, facilities and water infrastructure. The Township intends to continually improve this AMP over the coming years as additional information is collected and as its knowledge of asset condition increases. It is anticipated that at a minimum, the AMP will come for Council approval every 3 years.

The Township of South Frontenac is located in Eastern Ontario in Frontenac County, bounded by the City of Kingston and the Townships of Stone Mills, Tay Valley, Central Frontenac and Rideau Lakes (Figure 1). The Township has a population of 18,1001 and covers an area of 972 km2. Sydenham is the only area in which water servicing is available. Refer to Appendix A for a detailed map of the Township.

Figure 1 – Township of South Frontenac 1

Statistics Canada. (2012). Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 49 of 106 2

1.1

Provincial Guideline

In 2010, Ontario’s Ministry of Infrastructure released a guide titled Building Together: Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans. This guide forms part of a comprehensive strategy called the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) intended to develop a cooperative relationship between municipalities and the Province of Ontario to address our deteriorating infrastructure. The Province seeks to achieve standardization and consistency in the management of municipal infrastructure by requiring any municipality applying for provincial capital funding to prepare an AMP that demonstrates the particular need of the project within the social, economic or environmental priorities of the community.

Since the introduction of the Building Together: Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans, many funding agencies are requiring an asset management plan which shows the Townships priorities in order to apply for funding or to use existing funding. Projects must be listed within the asset management plan and must support or reflect that the selected projects are priorities. This includes for example the Federal Gas Tax Program and Ontario Communities Infrastructure Fund, both for its base funding and application based top-up funding.

1.2

Vision for Infrastructure in the Township of South Frontenac

As part of the Township’s Official Plan2, a Vision Statement was developed to guide the growth of the Township: “South Frontenac is an amalgamation of communities whose common goals have brought them together for mutual co-operation. The Official Plan provides a framework for directing South Frontenac’s growth in a manner which will preserve the Township’s environmental integrity while enhancing both its rural character and its long-term economic viability.” Although the Plan was primarily developed to guide new development in the Township, the same principles are also relevant to the management of South Frontenac’s infrastructure. The following points highlight some of the key goals and objectives presented in the Official Plan relating to asset management: •

Require adequate and efficient systems of water supply, sanitary sewage disposal, storm drainage and waste disposal to all areas of development in the Township and to co-ordinate development with the Township’s ability to provide adequate physical and community services; and

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 50 of 106 3 •

Provide an efficient and cost-effective transportation network that optimizes the movement of people and goods throughout the Township.

The Township’s Strategic Plan3 provides a clear directive to provide high quality services to residents through a series of priorities. One of the guiding principles is to take a long-term perspective to pro-actively plan for future infrastructure. The following priorities provide a vision for the management of the Township’s infrastructure and have helped to guide the development of this Plan:

Be a catalyst to support and help build vibrant communities. o

As a first priority, begin by supporting efforts to build vibrant hamlets that are friendly to residents of all ages, sustained by community and economic development, beautification plans, municipal services and facilities, social safety nets, housing options, and appropriate social, recreation and cultural opportunities.

Continually improve how the Township conducts its business. o

Develop an infrastructure master plan to identify and guide where the Township should be going over the long term in terms of water, waste, sewage, gas, Hwy 38, service levels, budget requirements, meeting increasing needs and so on.

Continue to enhance practices that help ensure financial responsibility, effective capital asset management, prudent planning, decision-making, transparency and accountability.

1.3 Goals of Asset Management Asset Management strives to continually improve the Township’s infrastructure. The following are a list of goals that asset management programs and processes aim to achieve: •

Optimize life cycle costs (i.e. total operating, maintenance and capital resources) of providing services to residents;

•

Reduce risk exposure by ensuring that assets are managed by recognizing the risk that their failure represents to the delivery of services;

•

Informed and transparent decision making processes integrating capital expenditures, operating costs and revenue requirements (i.e. rate and tax levels); and

•

Mechanisms to ensure that the infrastructure services are delivered at a sustainable and affordable level to residents.

Township of South Frontenac. (2003). Official Plan, Updated 2013

Township of South Frontenac. (2015). Strategic Plan.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 51 of 106 4

1.4

Scope of Asset Management Plan

This AMP developed for South Frontenac covers a period of 100 years and reports on the following assets owned by the Township: •

Roads;

•

Bridges and culverts;

•

Facilities;

•

Water treatment and storage facilities;

•

Water mains and water distribution system appurtenances; and

•

Storm sewers.

The Township is responsible for other assets including fleet, sidewalks, street lighting, land, sports fields among others, which will be added to the AMP as data gathered for these assets becomes more complete. The Township does not own any wastewater infrastructure or social housing assets.

1.5

Development of the Asset Management Plan

This AMP was updated by Township staff. The following documents were reviewed and incorporated throughout the development of this AMP: •

Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003)

•

Township of South Frontenac Strategic Plan

•

Municipal Budgets and other Financial Documents

•

South Frontenac Township By-Law 2013-30

•

O/Reg 239/02 for the Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways

The Township’s investment in Cartegraph, an asset management system has helped to guide the decisions for roads, bridges and culverts. Information on these assets, including condition, age and value, was sourced from this database. However, currently not all the components provided by Cartegraph are incorporated in this version of the asset management plan. This includes asset preservation and the sub-categorizing of road infrastructure. The current version provides for a like for like replacement and does not incorporate upgrades, improvements or growth. Water asset information was based on historical records from the Township. Facilities asset information is primarily based on historical records with replacement values being used from the consultant as initial presentation. On-going discussions with the consultant are taking place to finalize the data received and update the asset management plan. Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 52 of 106 5 Storm sewers data is based on useful life along with visual inspections as available.

1.6

Refinement of the AMP

The AMP is continually a work in progress as the Township continues to improve its data and processes in achieving the Township’s goals.

Initial data has been included for facilities. However, the full data received from the consultant is still under review and as it is finalized, the data will be updated.

The Township will further improve the data within the asset management plan by better streamlining the output of the Cartegraph data into the AMP document. The intent is to fully integrate the AMP within Cartegraph so that it fully provides the data and statistics within the AMP.

It is also the intent to incorporate other assets such as vehicles, equipment, sidewalks, and streetlights for example.

The Township will develop an Implementation Strategy that will improve subsequent iterations of the AMP.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 53 of 106 6

2.0

STATE OF INFRASTRUCTURE

This section summarizes the state of the Township’s infrastructure, including:

2.1

•

Inventory of all assets;

•

Value of the assets; and

•

Risk assessment, based on probability of failure and consequence of failure.

Asset Inventory

The asset inventory for South Frontenac includes transportation assets (roads, bridges and culverts), facilities, water assets (water treatment plant,

Table 1 – Inventory of Assets

storage, facility, and water mains), and storm sewers. Table 1 provides a summary of the assets included in

Asset Class

Inventory

the scope of this study. Other assets including fleet,

Roads

804 km

sidewalks, street lighting, land and other equipment

Bridges & Culverts

will be added to the asset management inventory over

Water Mains

6.4 km

the coming years as additional information is collected

Storm Sewers

7.9 km

and as knowledge of the condition of assets increases.

Facilities

2.2

Asset Value

Asset value was based on both historical costs and typical unit costs provided by the Township, detailed in Appendix B. Asset valuation is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 – Value of Assets by Asset Class Asset Class

Replacement Cost

Distribution

Roads

$288,461,000

81%

Bridges & Culverts

$25,771,265

Facilities

$27,307,000

Water Facilities

$7,011,571

Water mains

$3,317,202

Storm Sewers

$3,502,338

Total

$355,370,376

100%

The Township currently owns and operates $355 million of transportation, facilities and water assets. Roads represent 81% of the total value of the Township’s in-scope assets, followed by Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 54 of 106 7 facilities (8%) and bridges & culverts (7%). A graphical depiction of asset distribution is shown in Figure 2. Out of scope assets are estimated 6% or $21 million which includes for example, rolling stock.

Figure 2 – Asset Replacement Value Distribution Note that the Township is responsible for other assets that were not included in the AMP but will be incorporated in future updates to the plan as more information is gathered. Total replacement value of these assets is unknown at this time.

2.3

Asset Condition

Understanding the condition of the Township’s assets is an essential component in an AMP. Ideally, condition information is based on assessment activities that provide first-hand knowledge of the infrastructure. Condition information was available for transportation assets, and storm sewers in South Frontenac. Water assets are relatively new, and more information will be collected over time as inspections are conducted. Both water assets and facilities use historical information to estimate a condition rating. Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 55 of 106 8 2.3.1

Transportation and Stormwater Assets

Actual condition information was available for roads, bridges and culverts, and storm sewers in South Frontenac. The Township tracks transportation assets using Cartegraph, including asset condition, historical and current value, and location. Asset condition for roads was based on the Overall Condition Index (OCI) evaluated during the road inspections conducted in 2015. Asset condition for bridges and culverts was based on the Bridge Condition Index (BCI) from the most recent Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) reports from inspections conducted in 2015. Asset condition for storm sewers was based on structural grade evaluated during sewer inspections conducted in 2013 and 2015. Appendix B details how the condition assessment information for these asset types was converted to a condition score.

2.3.2

Water Assets

Condition information was not available for the water treatment plant, the water storage facility or water mains. Therefore, asset condition was estimated by evaluating the amount of useful life remaining. The water treatment plant, storage tower and water mains were all constructed in 2005 with plant upgrades completed in 2010. The amount of useful life remaining was based on present age and typical useful life, summarized in Table 3. All of these assets were found to have over 75% of useful life remaining; therefore, it was assumed that they are all in excellent condition. Table 3 - Estimated Condition Based on Useful Life Remaining Asset Description

Year Constructed

Typical Useful Life (Years)

Percent of Useful Life Remaining

Estimated Condition

Raw Water Intake

2005

100

89%

Excellent

Elevated Water Storage Tower

2005

100

89%

Excellent

Treatment Plant

2005

78%

Excellent

Plant Upgrades (UV & GAC contactors)

2010

76%

Excellent

Water Mains

2005

100

89%

Excellent

This approach provides sufficient condition information for analysis, and can be updated as knowledge of these assets increases.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 56 of 106 9 2.3.3

Asset Condition Summary

Table 4 summarizes the condition of the Township’s infrastructure. Approximately $16 million worth of assets are nearing the end of their useful life and are considered in critical condition. Table 4 – Value of Assets by Condition Score Condition Score

Replacement Cost

% of Total Assets

Excellent

$172,990,143

49%

Good

$53,421,106

15%

Fair

$77,744,634

22%

Poor

$34,657,331

10%

Critical

$16,557,162

Total

$307,385,082

100%

Approximately 15% of assets are in poor or critical condition. Figure 3 shows the value distribution of assets by condition graphically. Assets in critical and poor condition include a portion of the roads, bridges and culverts, and storm sewers.

Figure 3 – Distribution of Asset Condition

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 57 of 106 10

2.4

Asset Risk

The state of infrastructure is not only defined by its physical condition but also by its function and the consequence of failure. To achieve a better understanding of the Township’s needs, a risk score was calculated for each asset. For example, an asset with a low consequence of failure can be managed such that it remains in the listing of priorities but is ranked accordingly However, assets that have a high consequence of failure should be managed in a proactive manner. For the purposes of this AMP report, risk was defined as the product of the probability of failure and the consequence of failure, with additional consideration for Health and Safety risk. The Township currently tracks risk of transportation assets through Cartegraph. The system incorporates parameters to evaluate the condition of assets and includes a preventative strategy to extend the life of assets, such as crack sealing, microsurfacing, seal coats and ultrathin overlay. It also considers related assets including sidewalks and storm sewers in planning replacement work. The Township will continue to optimize the strategy used in this system to extend useful life of assets and employ a preventative maintenance strategy.

The chart below provides an overview of the benefits of preventative maintenance strategies where the life of an asset is extended beyond its original useful life.

Figure 4 – Preventative Maintenance Impact 4 http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca/en/

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 58 of 106 11 2.4.1

Probability of Failure

A probability of failure score was given to each asset based on the condition rating in Section 2.3 The probability of an asset failing is not necessarily indicative of its age (e.g. some newer water mains can fail more frequently than older water mains due to their production methods), and inspections where available are used to assess its condition. Where inspections aren’t available, age and remaining useful life is considered. This can also be addressed in future updates of the AMP in trying to build a database that tracks failure history of assets. Table 5 summarizes the probability of failure score that was assigned to each asset based on the estimate of its physical condition and age. Table 5 – Probability of Failure Score

2.4.2

Estimated Condition

Probability of Failure Description

Probability of Failure Score

Excellent

Improbable

Good

Unlikely

Fair

Possible

Poor

Likely

Critical

Highly Probable

Consequence of Failure

The consequence of failure score for each asset was based on a review of information that was provided by the Township, such as: •

Size/capacity/cost of the asset;

•

Location of the asset;

•

The use of the asset; and

•

The importance of the asset to the operation of the system/facility.

Table 6 summarizes the approach used to establish consequence of failure scores.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 59 of 106 12 Table 6 – Consequence of Failure Score Information Consequence of Failure Description

Consequence of Failure Score

Very low measureable effect of any kind

Low/ seldom/marginal impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment

Moderate/ regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment

Major/ regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment

Catastrophic loss of infrastructure affecting public safety or having severe environmental consequences.

Roads were assigned consequence of failure scores based on the type of road. Arterial roads were given a score of 5, collector roads were given a score of 4, and local roads were given a score of 3. Bridges and culverts located along arterial roads were given a higher score than those along local and collector roads.

The water treatment plant was assigned a score of 5 as failure at the plant would affect water quality in the distribution system and a treated water supply would not be available. Refer to Appendix B for further detail.

2.4.3

Risk Assessment

A risk score between 1 and 25 was calculated for each asset by multiplying consequence of failure scores and probability of failure scores. A third factor, Health & Safety Risk, was also considered. Assets with known safety risks were noted and given higher priority for replacement. This could include consideration for roads with high pedestrian traffic where no sidewalks exist, and roads with high vehicle collisions counts due to poor sightlines, among others. The Township will continue to update this rating as priority areas become known. A risk category was established for each asset based on risk score. Figure 5 summarizes the process that was used to categorize risk score into the following categories:

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 60 of 106 13 •

1 - 3 represents low level risk;

•

4 - 6 represents medium-low level risk;

•

8 - 9 represents medium level risk;

•

10 - 15 represents medium-high level risk;

•

16 - 25 represents a high level of risk.

Consequence

Probability of Failure 1

3 4

6 8

9 12

12 16

15 20

Figure 5 – Risk Matrix Table 7 summarizes the risk scores of the assets in the Township. Approximately 7% ($25 million) of assets have a high level of risk. Another 19% ($66 million) of the Township’s assets have a risk score of medium-high. Table 7 - Risk Score by Asset Value Risk

Replacement Cost

% of Assets

Low

$106,291,059

30%

Medium-Low

$108,063,466

30%

Medium

$49,383,416

14%

Medium-High

$66,418,235

19%

High

$25,214,200 $355,370,376

7% 100%

Total

High risk assets should be addressed in the near term (5 years) to reduce the risk exposure to the Township and medium-high risk assets should be addressed in the short term (5-10 years). Some assets may require early upgrading if health and safety factors pose a risk. Similarly, the Township may be able to delay the replacement of other assets if a higher level of risk can be accepted. The Township will consider a number of factors when prioritizing asset replacement and upgrades.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 61 of 106 14

Section 4 of this report describes the Asset Management Strategy suggested for addressing assets that represent elevated levels of risk. Risk distribution is summarized in Figure 6.

Figure 6 – Distribution of Asset Risk

2.5

Refinements by Township Staff

The condition, consequence of failure, and risk scores were reviewed with Township staff who utilized their knowledge of the Township’s infrastructure to refine the scores as much as possible. The Township recognizes that the general approach and individual risk scores for each asset will continue to be refined over the coming years as more information becomes available.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 62 of 106 15

3.0

LEVELS OF SERVICE

A “level of service” is a term that is used to describe how much of a service is being provided or the quality of a service that is being provided. In the context of asset management, levels of service are established as a way to guide the management of infrastructure in a manner that aims to achieve a level of service goal.

Levels of service in townships can vary widely related to finances, federal/provincial regulations, customer expectations, and/or corporate vision. In terms of Township infrastructure, the services provided are especially related to operation and maintenance cost and/or development and growth consideration. This section of the AMP gives an overview of service levels based on the Township’s existing documentation and current infrastructure management practices. The levels of service are often informal and undocumented.

3.1

Condition Levels of Service

The most basic level of service is to maintain infrastructure in an acceptable state of repair and minimize the risk exposure of the Township to an acceptable level. The capital works planning process usually addresses the infrastructure that is in the worst state of repair along with the highest risk meaning it would result in significant consequences if it were to fail, based on coordination among department managers and Council. The current capital planning process used by the Township does represent a risk-based approach to managing infrastructure and this AMP provides a high level summary of this process.

3.2

Capacity Levels of Service

Provincial policies and regulations define some minimum levels of service for water and transportation, including Ontario Regulation 239/02 (Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways)5 and Ontario Regulation 170/03 (Drinking Water Systems)6. Similar to most municipalities in Ontario, a comprehensive set of service levels to support more intensive asset management activities has not yet been prepared.

5 6

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_020239_e.htm http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_030170_e.htm

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 63 of 106 16

3.3

Existing Levels of Service

The primary resource to help define service levels was Ontario regulations. Majority of the levels of service documented are informal and are based on discussions with Township staff. These can be revisited and expanded upon as part of the AMP refinement process in the future.

3.3.1

Township Official Plan

The Official Plan provides some direction on the levels of services of the asset groups in the Township at a strategic level, based on the economic, social and environmental considerations for growth in the Township. Section 4.0 of the Official Plan lays out general goals and objectives related to servicing and transportation. This translates to a general level of service requiring adequate, efficient and cost effective services and transportation throughout the Township. The Official Plan does not document specific service targets or criteria.

3.3.2

Documented Service Levels

The Township strives towards to Ontario Regulation 239/02 which sets minimum standards of repair for roads and bridges under municipal jurisdiction. Through Cartegraph, the Township tracks and assesses their transportation assets and has a preventative strategy in place with an overall road overall condition index target of 70. This encompasses the Township’s desired level of service for road assets through a decision making process which considers road class, surface type, and roadside environment.

At this time, the Township does not have documented levels of service for storm sewers, facilities, water mains or water treatment facilities. Table 8 provides a set of typical service levels and performance metrics that the Township can consider in future updates of its AMP . A sample for facilities will also be provided in the next version of the AMP.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Table 8 – Typical Service Levels and Performance Metrics for Small Municipalities Department

Water Mains & Water Facilities

Storm Sewers

Roads & Bridges

Typical Levels of Service

Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis
Water system designed for maximum day + fire flow or maximum hour; Normal operating pressure between 350 to 480 kPa, 280 kPa to 700 kPa is allowable
Services at least 19 mm; Water mains at least 150 mm in diameter
Meet all regulated drinking water quality targets
Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis
Level of protection established based on nature of area drained (risk/loss/damage of life/property): Major system overland flooding less than 150 mm during 100 year event; Minor system – 5 year storm, 10 year storm in select high value commercial area; Culverts, major sewers designed for the 25 to 50 year depending on road classification; 50 year storm for overland flow, some flooding permitted to below depth of 100 mm.
Discourage the use of small isolated wet ponds with no environmental or aesthetic or recreational benefit
Provide services to Settlement Areas to accommodate growth on a cost recovery basis
Level of Service D on all roads in peak hour
Urban Arterial roads have bike lanes and transit
Sidewalks on two sides of urban arterial and residential collector, one side on all other urban roads.
All new roads are paved
Concrete curb & gutter (and storm sewer) on all urban roads
Volume to capacity ratios should not exceed 0.85 to 1 at intersections
Provide maintenance standards in accordance with O/Reg 239/02

Number of development applications that are delayed due to a lack of adequate water infrastructure Locations with inadequate pressure or flows confirmed through hydraulic modeling or field testing Locations with inadequate infrastructure (small mains or services) Number of times the regulated drinking water quality targets are not achieved 5. Number of customer complaints

Number of development applications that are delayed due to a lack of adequate storm water infrastructure
Number of locations where infrastructure does not meet protection target
Number of resident complaints
Number of development applications that are delayed
Number of roads less than level of service D during peak hour
Number of urban arterial roads with bike lanes and transit services
Number of roads that meet sidewalk level of service
Number of roads that are currently gravel that should be paved
Number of roads that do not meet curb/gutter/storm sewer level of service
Number of intersections that do not meet capacity level of service
Number of times road maintenance is not in accordance with O/Reg 239/02
Number of user complaints

FINAL December 2016

Page 64 of 106

Asset Management Plan

Suggested Performance Metric

Page 65 of 106 19

4.0

ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

4.1

Asset Management Strategy Overview

The asset management strategy component of the AMP represents the set of planned activities to ensure that the state of the infrastructure achieves the level of service goals. The strategy is generally related to optimizing decisions with respect to: •

The replacement or rehabilitation of assets;

•

The optimal level of maintenance investment required to minimize the long term costs of the assets (i.e. does more maintenance result in a longer useful life?);

•

Disposing of assets that are not required to meet service levels; and

•

Addressing Township policies that impact the infrastructure intervention that is used (i.e. does the asset size/design need to change to meet a certain policy).

4.2

Managing Risk

This AMP establishes the management of risk as the primary method for developing an asset management strategy. This strategy is to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township. However, these priorities are also adjusted or shifted for financial efficiencies, to create capacity, optimize asset life, as well as external influences. This risk management strategy develops a renewal plan that is based on addressing the highest risk assets first according to the risk categories that were established in Section 2 of this report.

The renewal of assets in the short term should be prioritized primarily based on risk. High risk assets should be replaced in the next 5 years (between 2018 and 2021), and medium-high risk assets should be replaced in the next ten years (between 2022 and 2026). To quantify the replacement value in each individual year, a random value in the corresponding replacement year period was generated for each asset. Medium, medium-low, and low risk assets should be replaced according to their remaining expected useful life over the long term (next 100 years). This strategy is summarized in Table 9.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 66 of 106 20 Table 9 – Renewal Strategy based on Risk Risk Category

Risk Score

Replacement Term

Replacement Year

High

16 – 25

Near Term (next 5 years)

2017 – 2021

Medium-High

10 – 15

Short Term (next 5-10 years)

2022 – 2026

Medium Medium-Low Low

7–9 4–6 1–3

Long Term - regular planned renewal based on condition, age of asset and expected useful life or when asset reaches a higher risk level (i.e. probability or consequence of failure increases)

The strategy to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township should be continued and expanded. The Township should continue to consider other factors when prioritizing asset replacement, such as health and safety, accessibility, complimentary asset replacement (road reconstruction, storm sewer and water main replacement at the same time) as well as upgrades/improvements including intersections, public safety, growth or capacity related demands (traffic volumes and developments). The replacement strategy established through Cartegraph that the Township currently uses for roads considers complimentary asset replacement to optimize use of resources and minimize disruption to the community. Appendix C provides the sample decision tree for road segments.

Figure 6 illustrates 10 year capital investment needs for the Township’s infrastructure using the risk-based asset management strategy. Over the next ten years, the Township should spend an average of $9.1 million per year to address the infrastructure needs (in constant 2016 dollars).

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 67 of 106

Figure 7 – 10 Year Capital Investment Needs

Page2268 of 106 4.3

Long Term Infrastructure Capital Investment Needs

Long-term investment over the next 100 years must be considered to plan for replacement of assets with longer life cycles. Buried infrastructure such as storm sewers and water mains are expected to have a useful life of 80 – 100 years, and may last even longer. Similarly, newly constructed water facilities have expected useful lives of 100 years. In order to capture replacement of all assets the full life cycle period must be considered.

Long-term investment associated with replacement needs for first, second, and third replacements over the next 100 years were based on condition, age and remaining useful life.

For example, culverts are assumed to have a useful life of 50 years. A culvert that was constructed in 1995 has 58% of its useful life remaining, or 29 years (more than half its useful life). The first replacement of this bridge should be scheduled for 2045. The second replacement would occur in 2095. The third replacement would occur in 2145, beyond the study scope. Further, where condition information is available, the replacement schedule is adjusted based on current condition.

Figure 7 provides the long term capital investment needs for the renewal of the Township’s existing infrastructure based on a strategic review of the replacement cost and theoretical useful life of each asset.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 69 of 106

Figure 8 – 100 Year Capital Investment Needs

Page 70 of 106 24

Based on this review, the existing in-scope infrastructure needs are approximately $8.3 million per year (in constant 2016 dollars), to be sustained using this strategic approach. This represents an overall lifecycle cost of approximately 3% on top of routine O&M costs, which usually are in the range of 3-5% for municipal infrastructure.

Over the coming years, the Township will continually review the infrastructure needs as more information becomes available and as technological improvements reduce the cost of renewing infrastructure.

4.4

Asset Management Strategies to Reduce Infrastructure Costs

The Township intends to continue advancing its asset management practices over the next several years. The infrastructure needs presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7 are based on the assumption that the Township will replace existing infrastructure with an identical asset and therefore uses replacement costs indicated. As previously mentioned, currently the AMP does not reflect other strategies currently being used such as preventative maintenance strategies and partnerships with neighboring municipalities. It is the Township’s intent to update future versions with the inclusion of these strategies and their impact. Currently condition would be the primary data that would reflect the impact of the strategies.

Further, it may be feasible to replace infrastructure at a lower cost by using alternative procurement methods, new technologies, or rehabilitating the existing assets. The following is a list of strategies that the Township will continue to consider and improve upon to reduce the costs of addressing the immediate infrastructure needs: •

Review the potential cost savings of multi-year contracts to renew infrastructure (i.e. road resurfacing, water main replacement, etc.);

•

Review operational practices to seek optimization of current assets.

•

Including interrelated assets when assessing a construction project

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 71 of 106 25

5.0

FINANCING STRATEGY

The financing strategy is the final component of the AMP and provides the plan to move forward. For the purposes of this report, it was assumed that all expenditures are in 2016 dollars, levies will be maintained in future years, and assets are replaced at the end of their useful life. This strategy does not account for inflation; typical increases and adjustments to address inflation are still required.

5.1

Sources of Funding

The Township of South Frontenac provides funding for assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. Further, assets are also funded through existing reserves. The financing strategy supports this method of operating by addressing Water and other assets separately. Note that this financing strategy assumes zero change to the existing funding received through senior government programs, including the Federal Gas Tax.

In 2012, South Frontenac approved a 1% tax levy increase, compounded yearly, which goes into the Asset Investment Reserve. This strategy is a proactive way to deal with infrastructure deficit, and is a best practice recommended by all regulatory agencies. This will help to offset capital expenditures for tax supported assets.

5.2

Short Term Financing Strategy

5.2.1

Water Assets

The water treatment plant, water storage facility and water mains were constructed in the past 10 years; as such, these assets are not expected to require major capital replacement in the short term. Utilities Kingston operates the facility and has developed a short term capital investment forecast for the next 10 years. This forecast has been included in short term expenditures.

The Township is currently in a position of deficit from accumulated depreciation of the water treatment plant and water mains constructed in 2005. In 2014, The Township implemented a rate change which in the last 3 years has already reduced the deficit. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for water infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Table 11.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 72 of 106 26

Table 10 – Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total

Opening Balance Expenditures 451,920 26,300 591,569 31,680 726,187 3,500 889,314 11,860 1,044,385 110,500 1,101,098 10,000 1,258,311 29,830 1,395,693 275,500 1,287,406 23,500 1,431,119 436,000 958,670

Capital Levy 165,949 166,298 166,626 166,931 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213

Ending Balance 591,569 726,187 889,314 1,044,385 1,101,098 1,258,311 1,395,693 1,287,406 1,431,119 1,162,332

This table illustrates that over the course of the next 10 years, the current proposed Water Capital Levy is sufficient to finance the Asset Management Plan expenditures. The surplus at the end of 2025 will be used to finance future year’s expenditures.

5.2.2

Tax Supported Assets

Tax supported infrastructure includes roads, bridges, culverts and storm sewers. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for tax supported infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Table 12. Table 11 – Short Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 TOTAL

Opening Balance Expenditures 739,314 -237,686 -1,926,186 -3,039,461 -1,871,699 -2,406,015 -7,349,967 -8,988,807 -11,247,254 -14,795,656

Asset Management Plan

6,477,000 7,463,500 7,177,025 5,199,175 7,219,600 11,963,500 9,009,366 9,997,500 11,674,408 7,935,000 84,116,074

Tax Levy

Reserves & Funding

Ending Balance

4,205,339 4,415,606 4,636,386 4,868,205 5,111,615 5,367,196 5,635,556 5,917,334 6,213,201 6,523,861

1,294,661 1,359,394 1,427,364 1,498,732 1,573,669 1,652,352 1,734,970 1,821,719 1,912,805 2,008,445

-237,686 -1,926,186 -3,039,461 -1,871,699 -2,406,015 -7,349,967 -8,988,807 -11,247,254 -14,795,656 -14,198,350

FINAL December 2016

Page 73 of 106 27

Over the course of the next 10 years the current Tax Supported Capital Levy is insufficient to finance the Asset Management Plan expenditures. At the end of 2026 there is a deficit of $14.1 million. However, the AMP presents yearly capital expenditures based on their priorities from condition and risk and further does not reflect the savings from strategies already being used such as pavement preservation and joint tendering.

5.2.3

Addressing the Short-Term Financial Requirements

The following list of alternatives should be considered to reduce the financing requirements over the next ten years: 1.

The Township will develop an Implementation Strategy to improve this Plan over the next few years. This would include optimizing the current service levels and continuing to update condition, risk, and health and safety information.

Further

incorporating strategies already being used rather a like for like replacement calculation will be beneficial in future presentations to better reflect the Township’s position. 2.

Continue to raise reserve funds through taxation to offset accumulating depreciation costs.

Some municipalities rely on debt to decrease to reduce tax rate increases. This may be viewed as a feasible option, but it must be recognized that debt offers short term relief but long term pain. Money borrowed today must be paid back in the future with interest.

Continue to pursue Provincial and Federal grants whenever possible. Apart from Federal Gas Tax and OCIF, the Plan assumes no grant funding from the Provincial and Federal Governments. This is a conservative approach that is recommended in the Provincial government’s asset management guide. Both senior levels of government have acknowledged that they should share in addressing the infrastructure deficit. It is reasonable to assume that funds will become available in the future from both senior levels of government.

Over the past few years, the Township has undertaken a proactive approach to addressing their financial position, and should continue to do so. Setting aside reserves to address future expenditures puts the Township in a good position financially. The Township should continue to employ proactive financing strategies to minimize deficit and keep this infrastructure in good condition well into the future. Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 74 of 106 28

5.3

Long Term Financing Strategy

5.3.1

Water Assets

The Capital Expenditures over the 100 years indicate that the asset replacements for water assets are grouped in large amounts. Water assets were all constructed around the same time, and as such, are expected to need replacement in the same year, according to expected useful life. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures on water infrastructure over the next 100 years are displayed in Table 13. Table 12 – Long Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Investment Period

Opening Balance

2017-2026 2027-2036 2037-2046 2047-2056 2057-2066 2067-2076 2077-2086 2087-2096 2097-2106 2107-2116 Total

451,920 1,162,332 1,658,944 3,395,457 1,053,897 1,654,714 3,497,515 854,120 2,771,370 -1,078,756

Expenditures

Capital Levy

Ending Balance

958,670 1,205,851 0 4,112,802 1,205,851 0 4,523,052 0 5,805,720 1,205,851 19,017,797

1,669,082 1,702,463 1,736,513 1,771,243 1,806,668 1,842,801 1,879,657 1,917,250 1,955,595 1,994,707

1,162,332 1,658,944 3,395,457 1,053,897 1,654,714 3,497,515 854,120 2,771,370 -1,078,756 -289,899

Over the course of the next 100 years the current Water Capital Levy is insufficient to finance the Asset Management Plan expenditures. By the end of the 100 years, additional financing of $290,000 will need to be applied to the Water User Fees Supported capital program.

The

existing rates and long term plan will continue to be reviewed from a long term perspective to ensure the long term sustainability of the water assets.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 75 of 106 29

5.3.2

Tax Supported Assets

The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for tax supported infrastructure over the next 100 years, separated into decades, are displayed in Table 15. Table 13 – Long Term Capital Expenditures (Tax Supported Assets) Year

Opening Balance

Expenditures

Tax Levy

Reserves & Funding

Ending Balance

2017-2026 2027-2036 2037-2046 2047-2056 2057-2066 2067-2076 2077-2086 2087-2096 2097-2106 2107-2116

739,314 -14,198,350 -35,924,642 -50,655,390 -16,318,410 17,980,904 -18,127,944 -27,475,117 -9,093,944 -10,314,523

84,116,074 92,634,162 87,411,314 40,160,599 42,060,706 114,377,867 89,572,917 63,850,214 85,507,750 54,534,401

52,894,299 54,216,656 55,572,072 56,961,374 58,385,408 59,845,043 61,341,169 62,874,698 64,446,565 66,057,729

16,284,111 16,691,214 17,108,494 17,536,206 17,974,611 18,423,976 18,884,575 19,356,689 19,840,606 20,336,621

-14,198,350 -35,924,642 -50,655,390 -16,318,410 17,980,904 -18,127,944 -27,475,117 -9,093,944 -10,314,523 21,545,426

TOTAL

754,226,004

The Township has approved a 1% tax levy increase, compounded yearly. This is a good step in addressing the necessary financing. Over the course of the next 100 years the current Tax Supported Capital Levy, coupled with the 1% Asset Investment Reserve is sufficient to finance the Asset Management Plan expenditures. The surplus at the end of the last two decades will be needed to offset the effects of inflation. It is important to note the financing shortfall in most decades. If additional financing becomes available then it should be applied to the early years of this financing scenario. 5.3.3

Addressing the Long-Term Financial Requirements

The best strategy to address the long-term financing is to continue to develop improved asset management tools and processes. These strategies include the following: •

Continue to establish appropriate levels of service and associated performance metrics to track how well the infrastructure is meeting the service levels. This may result in some higher-risk assets being renewed at a later time and/or some lower-risk assets becoming a priority for renewal at an earlier time than expected. For example, a road asset that is identified as low risk may need to be replaced because it poses a health and safety risk.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 76 of 106 30

•

Maintain an up-to-date database of asset condition based on regular inspections.

•

Collect and review additional condition/performance information for the Township’s infrastructure to better assess the probability of failure. For example, tracking and reviewing water main break records is a much better indicator for the future probability of failure of the asset. This analysis can then be used to adjust the infrastructure needs.

•

Consider non-infrastructure solutions to achieve service levels. For example, promoting a cycling-friendly community could be accomplished by improved signage, reducing speed limits or undertaking educational campaigns, without additional infrastructure.

•

Consider consolidating or eliminating redundant infrastructure. For example, removing bridges that are under-utilized or have alternate bridges that can be used will reduce the long term infrastructure needs while maintaining service levels.

The Township has already taken a good first step by investing in the Cartegraph asset management system to prioritize asset repair, rehabilitation and replacement. An extensive database has been developed to manage road assets and the Township is dedicated to updating and maintaining this as new or more up-to-date information becomes available. The Township should continue to assess and prioritize asset replacement needs by incorporating appropriate levels of service, risk tolerance, and updated condition assessment as new technologies and methods for assessing assets become available.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Page 77 of 106 31

6.0

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Township’s Asset Management Plan identifies a long-term need of $8.3 million/year to renew the Township’s infrastructure for assets in the scope of this study. Asset renewal in the short term should be prioritized to minimize risk and address health and safety concerns.

The Township has taken a proactive approach in addressing infrastructure needs by setting aside reserve funds to minimize deficits, approving levy increases to cover future deficits and investing in Cartegraph to better understand transportation asset condition, risk

and

replacement needs. The Township is committed to maintaining an up-to-date asset management database including levels of service, risk tolerance, and condition to improve the process for assessing and prioritizing asset repair, rehabilitation and replacement. Further it is committed to using strategies such as pavement preservation and joint tendering as well as investigating future opportunities or strategies. The Township is in a better position financially than many municipalities in Ontario and should continue to engage in forward thinking financial planning.

The Township provides funding for assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. Reserves are also used as a source of funding. Both in the short term and in the long term, the financing strategies being used including the use of a long range financial plan puts the Township in a position to meet future requirements

Over the coming years, the Township will continually review the infrastructure needs as more information is gathered. The Township will continue to set aside funds for asset replacement, build appropriate depreciation costs into future water rate adjustments, and continue to pursue Provincial and Federal infrastructure grants. This strategy positions the Township on a path to ultimately reach a point where the infrastructure needs equal the available revenues.

Asset Management Plan

FINAL December 2016

Appendix B

Page 78 of 106

Page 79 of 106

APPENDIX C - SAMPLE DECISION TREE

Page 80 of 106 Input Segment

Class

Arterial

Local, Collectors Manual Choice (Future guidance from AADT)

Reconstruction LCB

Gravel

Surface Treated

Manual Choice (Future guidance from AADT)

Reconstruction HCB

OCI <=55

OCI <= 55

Yes

Rehabilitation – LCB (125/m)

55 < OCI <=60

60 < OCI <= 80

Surface Type

Asphalt

Reconstruction – HCB (500/m)

Urban

Full Depth Reclamation (340/m)

Cold In Place Recycling (21/m2)

Roadside Environment

Yes

Rural

Are Severe Base Defects Visible

Rural

Roadside Environment

Yes

Are Base Defects Visible?

Yes

Do Nothing

Seal Cost (2.5/m2)

Do Nothing

Yes

Previous Seal Cost

No Urban Do Nothing

Mill and Pave (18/ m2)

Do Nothing

Yes

Are Base Defects Visible?

Urban

Roadside Environment

Yes

60 < OCI <=70

Treatment Notes

Rural

Yes

Do Nothing

Rehabilitation – LCB: Includes the Removal of existing Road, Repairing of any base defects, culverts, ditching, gravel and surface treatment (even if it occurs in the next year) No Overlay (12/m2)

Are Base Defects Visible?

Do Nothing

Mill and Pave: Milling of a required depth of asphalt to assure that proper grading and drainage is maintained prior to new overlay surface.

Yes

Microsurfacing (7.5/m2)

Are Base Defects Visible?

Yes

70 < OCI <=85

Do Nothing

Reconstruction – HCB: Is currently a lump sum which represents the full depth excavation of the Road, replacement of underground, rebuild and sidewalks if applicable. With greater knowledge of the associated assets these costs can be refined (i.e. separate costs for sidewalks, water, storm system components)

Yes

Do Nothing

Page 81 of 106

Surface Treated

Manual Choice (Future guidance from AADT)

Reconstruction HCB

OCI <= 60

Yes

Rehabilitation – LCB (125/m)

60 < OCI <=65

70 < OCI <= 90

Surface Type

Asphalt

Reconstruction – HCB (500/m)

Urban

Full Depth Reclamation (340/m)

Cold In Place Recycling (21/m2)

Do Nothing

Roadside Environment

Yes

Rural

Are Severe Base Defects Visible

Rural

Roadside Environment

Yes

Are Base Defects Visible?

Do Nothing

Previous Seal Cost

Yes

Do Nothing

Seal Cost (2.5/m2)

No Urban

Do Nothing

Mill and Pave (18/ m2)

Do Nothing

Yes

Are Base Defects Visible?

Urban

Roadside Environment

Yes

65 < OCI <=75

Rural

Yes

No Overlay (12/m2)

Are Base Defects Visible?

Do Nothing

Yes

Microsurfacing (7.5/m2)

Are Base Defects Visible?

Yes

80 < OCI <=90

Do Nothing

Yes

Do Nothing

APPENDIX D-1 Roads ID

Street

Moreland Dixon Road Alton Road

To Sunbury Road Freeman Road

Classification

Arterial Arterial Arterial Buck Bay Road New Road Arterial New Road Burridge Road Arterial Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Portland Avenue Alton Road Arterial Road 38 Loughborough Portland RArterial Wolfe Lake Road Bresee Road Arterial Concession 12 Arterial Sydenham Road Perth Road 10 Arterial Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Cross Road Road 38 Arterial Moreland Dixon Road Arterial Brewer Lake Road Arterial Road 38 High Falls Road Arterial Sarah Street Burnt Hills Road Arterial Kingston Road Arterial Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Arterial Salmon Lake Road Desert Lake Road Arterial Arterial Kingston Road Arterial Spooner Road Arterial Arterial Devil Lake Road Local Percy Street Main Street Local Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local Battersea Road Battersea Road Local Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road Local Battersea Road Frontenac Road Local Craig Road Craig Road Local Craig Road Local Moore Farm Lane Desert Lake Road Local Battersea Road Local Bellrock Road Local Davidson Road Perth Road 10 Local Frontenac Road Beach Nut Road Local Bresee Road Concession 12 Arterial Petworth Road Local Kerr Road Road 38 Local Holmes Road Local Arterial Lions Club Road Pine Ridge Road Arterial Murvale Road Local Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial Battersea Road Brewer Lake Road Arterial Bob’s Lake Road Steele Road Local Lions Club Road Arterial Sunbury Road Larry York Road Arterial Larry York Road Sarah Street Arterial Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local Desert Lake Road Piccadilly Road Arterial Loughborough Portland Road Arterial Latimer Road Holmes Road Local Piccadilly Road Local Westport Road White Lake Road Local Burridge Road Arterial Perth Road 10 Local Battersea Road Local

Roadside Environment Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Gravel Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 2 Class 4 Class 4 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 2 Class 2 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

500 3850 200 7700 3400 2200 600 1000 3600 1200 1350 5850 3400 1300 4300 1300 2950 2300 5350 1700 3600 700 800 5400 3100 1000 100 250 150 950 400 100 250 4400 2200 1300 2900 1600 1400 600 3550 600 4750 1200 950 700 3200 1400 1250 3900 5200 2050 250 100 3100 1400 1000 450 1700 2500 150 1000

7.3 6.2 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.4 7.7 6.7 6.6 6.6 6.7 7 6.8 7.2 7 6.2 6.4 7.5 6.4 6.4 7.9 12.5 8.7 6.7 4 3.7 3.2 5.8 4.9 5.8 4 3.5 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.3 6.1 6.6 4.3 6.3 6.2 7.5 7.6 4.2 7 7 7 6.7 7.5 6.7 7.3 5 3.2 7.8 6.7 6.4 6 5.7 6.8 6 5.4

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

3650 09/09/2015 23870 10/22/2015 1240 12/04/2015 50820 11/25/2015 22440 11/25/2015 14740 09/10/2015 3840 09/10/2015 7700 10/22/2015 24120 09/01/2015 7920 11/25/2015 8910 11/25/2015 39195 10/22/2015 23800 09/10/2015 8840 09/01/2015 30960 09/09/2015 9100 09/10/2015 18290 09/01/2015 14720 09/10/2015 40125 09/02/2015 10880 09/10/2015 23040 10/22/2015 5530 09/10/2015 10000 09/02/2015 46980 09/09/2015 20770 09/10/2015 4000 04/26/2016 370 09/01/2015 800 09/01/2015 870 12/18/2015 4655 09/10/2015 2320 09/09/2015 400 09/01/2015 875 09/01/2015 27280 09/01/2015 13420 09/11/2015 7930 09/01/2015 18270 09/09/2015 9760 09/09/2015 9240 11/25/2015 2580 09/01/2015 22365 09/01/2015 3720 09/09/2015 35625 09/02/2015 9120 09/02/2015 3990 10/22/2015 4900 09/10/2015 22400 09/10/2015 9800 09/10/2015 8375 11/25/2015 29250 09/02/2015 34840 09/10/2015 14965 09/10/2015 1250 09/01/2015 320 09/01/2015 24180 09/02/2015 9380 10/22/2015 6400 09/09/2015 2700 09/01/2015 9690 11/25/2015 17000 11/25/2015 900 09/10/2015 5400 09/09/2015

34.22 18.33 30.33 30.22 39.78 25.11 38.89 51.78 47 53.56 42 49.89 43.78 44.67 53 49 44.22 54.11 50.56 54.11 43.78 66.67 58 69.11 61.22 29.11 9 14 30.56 35.89 33.33 37 29.44 38.67 25.67 33.33 19.11 31.22 57.11 18.22 18.78 35.44 55.89 65 33.56 63.22 67.11 61.44 32.33 56.78 69.11 68.56 24 14 67.67 62.67 26.78 39.67 17.11 59.78 46.67 44.89

Pavement Area (m2)

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate 5 = poor/likely) high) 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 450 300 300 450 450 450 450 300 300 450 450 300 300 1500 1500 450 450 250 1500 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 450 1500 300 300 300 300 450 450 450 1500 1500 1500 450 450 300 450 300 300 300 300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

750,000.00 1,155,000.00 60,000.00 2,310,000.00 1,020,000.00 660,000.00 180,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,620,000.00 360,000.00 405,000.00 2,632,500.00 1,530,000.00 585,000.00 1,935,000.00 390,000.00 885,000.00 1,035,000.00 2,407,500.00 510,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,050,000.00 1,200,000.00 2,430,000.00 1,395,000.00 250,000.00 150,000.00 375,000.00 45,000.00 285,000.00 120,000.00 30,000.00 75,000.00 1,320,000.00 660,000.00 390,000.00 870,000.00 480,000.00 420,000.00 180,000.00 1,065,000.00 180,000.00 2,137,500.00 1,800,000.00 285,000.00 210,000.00 960,000.00 420,000.00 562,500.00 1,755,000.00 2,340,000.00 3,075,000.00 375,000.00 150,000.00 1,395,000.00 630,000.00 300,000.00 202,500.00 510,000.00 750,000.00 45,000.00 300,000.00

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 3 4 4

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 5 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

1990 1992 1992 2000 2000 2003 2007 1992 1998 2000 2000 2001 1967 1983 1994 2003 2004 2007 1993 2007 2007 1989 1993 2003 2003 2003 2016 2016 1990 1993 1995 1995 1996 1997 1997 2000 2001 2001 2002 2003 2003 2012 1994 1994 1995 2003 2011 2012 1991 1995 2000 2004 2016 2016 1996 2000 2003 1975 2007 2008 2000 2002

50 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 30 30 50 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 75 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 50 30 30 30 30

25 25 25 25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2018 to 2021 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026

2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2026 2026 2026 2022 2022

Page 82 of 106

50125 Battersea Road 51115 Bedford Road 53185 Desert Lake Road 57785 Westport Road 57900 Westport Road 50750 Battersea Road 50675 Battersea Road 51000 Bedford Road 53415 Harrowsmith Road 58245 Westport Road 58475 Westport Road 56520 Rutledge Road 56635 Sunbury Road 52150 Bellrock Road 50000 Battersea Road 56980 Sunbury Road 52495 Desert Lake Road 50500 Battersea Road 54910 Road 38 50625 Battersea Road 51690 Bedford Road 53760 Perth Road 10 55140 Road 38 53645 Perth Road 10 53875 Perth Road 10 46225 Tobin Road 42520 Goodrich Street 44980 Percy Street 44275 McGarvey Road 45415 Rideau Road 44470 Mount Chesney Road 44070 Mallen Road 44185 Masonville Road 42910 Hinchinbrooke Road 45340 Randy Clark Road 46780 York Road 43735 Latimer Road 44485 Mount Chesney Road 58360 Westport Road 43435 Kerr Road 45055 Petworth Road 43585 Lakefield Drive 55255 Road 38 55485 Road 38 40075 Amey Road 56865 Sunbury Road 56750 Sunbury Road 57095 Sunbury Road 40630 Bradshaw Road 55370 Road 38 50250 Battersea Road 50375 Battersea Road 40435 Bellrock Mill Street 40465 Bellrock Pepper Street 55715 Road 38 56060 Rutledge Road 41695 Davidson Road 40180 Arena Boundary Road 40720 Buck Bay Road 58015 Westport Road 42655 Greenfield Road 44455 Mount Chesney Road

From

Street

From

Classification

Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 3 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6

Length (m)

Width (m)

4800 500 1300 3550 1800 1500 1800 1200 1400 1350 700 1400 2400 1000 3750 600 500 2200 2100 950 650 1700 300 400 4000 300 8000 2050 500 4150 3300 1300 200 750 300 900 100 800 300 300 1400 150 2900 3700 550 700 2100 550 150 1300 1200 1850 900 1700 800 800 1100 300 2700 1550 900 400 500

6 5.5 5.5 4.6 3 5.5 5.5 4.2 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 4.3 4.6 5 6.3 6 6.1 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.2 3.6 6 5.7 3.5 4 6.7 7.8 6.7 6.7 9.1 6.7 7.4 6.7 6.7 5.1 3.8 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.7 6.6 4.3 4 2.4 4.5 6.4 5.3 6.1 6.2 5.9 6.5 5.7 5.5 4.9 4.9 3.7 5.6 6.5 5.5 5 4.5

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

28800 04/18/2016 2750 04/18/2016 7150 04/18/2016 16330 04/15/2016 5400 04/22/2016 8250 10/01/2010 9900 04/18/2016 5040 04/15/2016 8960 09/01/2015 8775 09/01/2015 4550 09/01/2015 9100 10/22/2015 10320 04/26/2016 4600 04/15/2016 18750 09/01/2015 3780 12/18/2015 3000 10/22/2015 13420 09/10/2015 13650 10/22/2015 6175 10/22/2015 4355 10/22/2015 10540 09/09/2015 1080 09/01/2015 2400 09/09/2015 22800 09/10/2015 1050 04/26/2016 32000 04/18/2016 13735 09/02/2015 3900 09/02/2015 27805 09/09/2015 22110 09/02/2015 11830 11/25/2015 1340 12/18/2015 5550 09/02/2015 2010 12/04/2015 6030 11/25/2015 510 09/01/2015 3040 10/22/2015 1860 09/09/2015 1920 09/10/2015 8960 09/01/2015 1005 09/01/2015 19140 09/01/2015 15910 04/15/2016 2200 10/01/2010 1680 04/18/2016 9450 04/15/2016 3520 11/25/2015 795 04/18/2016 7930 12/18/2015 7440 09/10/2015 10915 09/02/2015 5850 09/02/2015 9690 09/01/2015 4400 10/01/2010 3920 10/01/2010 5390 04/18/2016 1110 10/01/2010 15120 09/01/2015 10075 10/22/2015 4950 09/01/2015 2000 09/01/2015 2250 04/22/2016

50.89 48.89 47.67 51 43 53.44 49.89 49.78 58.22 58.78 64.78 50.78 53.22 40 51.33 52.11 51.78 53.89 48.56 45.33 63.22 51.44 54 50.78 49.44 40.67 51.56 70.33 73.33 82.44 80.67 81.56 79.56 70.33 84 59.22 67.78 57.44 62.44 64.78 68.89 67.11 56.89 56.44 60.33 67.11 67 58.56 68.89 61 58.44 68.33 68.33 65.44 66.44 67.44 65.89 63.78 56.22 63.89 61.56 67.78 69.22

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 250 250 250 250 250 300 250 250 300 300 300 300 250 250 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 1500 300 300 300 250 250 450 1500 450 450 450 450 450 300 450 1500 300 1500 1500 300 1500 300 250 250 250 250 300 250 300 300 300 300 300 250 250 250 250 300 300 300 300 250

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,200,000.00 125,000.00 325,000.00 887,500.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 300,000.00 420,000.00 405,000.00 210,000.00 420,000.00 600,000.00 250,000.00 1,125,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00 660,000.00 630,000.00 285,000.00 975,000.00 2,550,000.00 90,000.00 120,000.00 1,200,000.00 75,000.00 2,000,000.00 922,500.00 750,000.00 1,867,500.00 1,485,000.00 585,000.00 90,000.00 337,500.00 90,000.00 405,000.00 150,000.00 240,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 420,000.00 225,000.00 870,000.00 925,000.00 137,500.00 175,000.00 525,000.00 165,000.00 37,500.00 390,000.00 360,000.00 555,000.00 270,000.00 510,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 275,000.00 75,000.00 810,000.00 465,000.00 270,000.00 120,000.00 125,000.00

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2003 2003 2003 2004 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 1986 1996 1999 2007 2007 2012 2003 1993 1995 1997 1997 2007 2009 2000 2004 1991 1995 1995 1997 1997 1997 1998 2000 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2006 1992 1995 1996 1996 1996 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2006

75 75 75 75 75 30 75 75 30 30 30 30 75 75 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 30 30 30 75 75 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 50 50 30 50 50 30 50 30 75 75 75 75 30 75 30 30 30 30 30 75 75 75 75 30 30 30 30 75

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2022 to 2026 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033

2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2023 2023 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2026 2026 2026 2026 2026 2026 2037 2022 2024 2025 2025 2025 2025 2026 2028 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028

Page 83 of 106

41155 Carrying Place Road Burnt Hills Road Local 42370 Frontenac Road Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Local 43240 Ida Hill Road Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local 43885 Leveque Road Bellrock Pero Road Local 43900 Little Long Lake Road Bedford Road Charlie Green Road Local 42505 German Road Petworth Road Long Swamp Road Local 44290 McGarvey Road Battersea Road Princess Road Local 44425 Miller Road Road 38 Local 43975 Loughborough Portland RoHarrowsmith Road Alton Road Collector 43990 Loughborough Portland RoAlton Road Jamieson Road Collector 44005 Loughborough Portland RoJamieson Road Vanluven Road Collector 44560 Murvale Road Scanlan Road Amey Road Local 44500 Mulville Road Devil Lake Road Local 45355 Redmond Road Redmond Road Local 41575 Craig Road Road 38 Local 45580 Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local 45775 Scanlan Road Murvale Road Murvale Road Local 45595 Round Lake Road Latimer Road Battersea Road Local 45640 Salmon Lake Road Bedford Road Local 45760 Scanlan Road Murvale Road Local 46000 Stage Coach Road Campbell Road Rutledge Road Collector 43750 Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local 45010 Peters Road Harrowsmith Road Local 41785 Deer Creek Drive Spooner Road Local 44665 North Shore Road Hewlett Packard Road Convery Lane Local 43465 Kingsford Lake Road Devil Lake Road Local 42205 Fishing Lake Road North Shore Road Local 58935 Yarker Road 4 Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Arterial 55600 Road 38 Pine Ridge Road Desert Lake Road Arterial 53530 Moreland Dixon Road Perth Road 10 Battersea Road Arterial 58705 Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Road 38 Arterial 58130 Westport Road Canoe Lake Road Canoe Lake Road Arterial 54335 Perth Road 10 Arterial 55830 Road 38 Piccadilly Road Arterial 52610 Desert Lake Road High Falls Road High Falls Road Arterial 40615 Bradshaw Road Road 38 Bob’s Lake Road Local 42025 Easy Street Road 38 Local 42115 Fellows Road Murvale Road Local 41965 Division Street Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local 42100 Fairgrounds Road Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local 42895 Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Moore Farm Lane Local 41215 Centennial Park Road Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local 43030 Holleford Road New Morin Road Johnny Martin Road Local 42175 First Lake Road First Lake Road Snider Road Local 42310 Freeman Road Loughborough Portland R Gould Lake Road Local 43405 Keir Road Duff Road Local 43915 Long Swamp Road Bellrock Road Bellrock Road Local 41605 Crow Lake Road Badour Road Badour Road Local 43420 Keller Road Larry York Road Local 45565 Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local 45535 Round Lake Road Latimer Road Latimer Road Local 44515 Murton Road Road 38 Road 38 Local 44530 Murton Road Road 38 Murvale Road Local 44590 New Morin Road Vanluven Road Holleford Road Local 43660 Lambert Road Stage Coach Road Local 45310 Ramparts Road Battersea Road Local 45325 Ramparts Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local 45400 Rickards Road Rutledge Road Local 40030 Alton Road Road 38 Loughborough Portland RLocal 44545 Murvale Road Murton Road Scanlan Road Local 45175 Quarry Road Boyce Road Local 45160 Quarry Road Boyce Road Boyce Road Local 45610 Roushorn Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local

Roadside Environment

Street

Latimer Road

Classification

Latimer Road Local Cross Road Local Lower Round Lake Road Local Craig Road Local Cross Road McMahon Drive Local Perth Road 10 Local Battersea Road Local Battersea Road Local Bob’s Lake Road Local Westport Road Local Lee Road Local Loughborough Portland Road Local North Shore Road Local Opinicon Road Billy Green Road Local Battersea Road Local Westport Road Local Harrowsmith Road Local White Lake Road Burns Road Local Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Local Westport Road Westport Road Local Westport Road Green Bay Road Local Westport Road Westport Road Local Perth Road 10 Local Desert Lake Road Local Bunker Hill Road Canoe Lake Road Local Billy Green Road Local Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Perth Road 10 Local Local Burridge Road Lee Road Local Westport Road Green Bay Road Local Clair Road Local Westport Road Local Holleford Road Local Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local Opinicon Road Local Dewitt Road Local Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Westport Road Westport Road Local Silverwood Drive Davidson Road Local Bradshaw Road Local Verona Street Road 38 Local Watson Road Local Holleford Road Loughborough Portland RLocal Walker Street Bank Street Local Hinchinbrooke Road Holleford Road Local Buck Bay Road White Lake Road Local Canoe Lake Road Canoe Lake Road Local Henderson Road Henderson Road Local Gould Lake Road Bedford Road Local Round Lake Road Ernie Road Local Ernie Road Local North Shore Crescent Hewlett Packard Road Local Yarker Road 4 Mclean Road Local Rutledge Road McFadden Road Local Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local Railton Road Campbell Road Collector Cemetery Road Road 38 Collector Portland Avenue Local Shales Road Local Petworth Road Local Pine Ridge Road Local

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Surface treated Asphalt Gravel Gravel Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Gravel Gravel Surface treated Asphalt

Maintenace Class Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 3 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6

Length (m)

Width (m)

1000 2200 150 250 1250 3100 2200 150 2500 1400 1500 800 500 1800 400 5400 200 5200 1600 500 2200 500 500 3200 5900 1500 1400 5700 4200 3100 500 350 1600 600 1600 500 600 900 650 600 900 2200 50 400 2400 100 1700 5400 1000 1300 1950 2100 1450 5800 1550 4750 450 2200 1250 200 500 450 200

6.3 5 3 3.5 7 4.5 4.5 2.8 4.5 4.5 4.9 5 3.7 4.9 4.9 4.3 4 6.4 5.9 3 4.5 4 4.5 4 4 4 4.5 4.5 4 4 4.9 4 4.6 4.2 5 4 3.5 5.2 4.5 4.2 6.4 5 8.8 4.5 6.1 5 6.2 4.9 3.5 6.3 6.2 6.6 6.2 6.3 5.9 6.7 4.2 6.5 7.3 3 4.3 5.5 5.1

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

6300 12/18/2015 11000 09/01/2015 450 10/01/2010 875 09/01/2015 8750 09/01/2015 13950 04/22/2016 9900 04/18/2016 420 09/10/2015 11250 04/26/2016 6300 04/26/2016 7350 04/26/2016 4000 04/15/2016 1850 10/01/2010 8820 10/01/2010 1960 04/18/2016 23220 04/26/2016 800 04/15/2016 33280 04/26/2016 9440 09/02/2015 1500 04/26/2016 9900 04/26/2016 2000 04/26/2016 2250 04/22/2016 12800 04/15/2016 23600 04/26/2016 6000 10/01/2010 6300 04/22/2016 25650 10/01/2010 16800 10/01/2010 12400 04/26/2016 2450 04/26/2016 1400 04/15/2016 7360 04/26/2016 2520 04/15/2016 8000 04/18/2016 2000 10/01/2010 2100 04/26/2016 4680 04/22/2016 2925 10/01/2010 2520 04/26/2016 5760 09/09/2015 11000 10/01/2010 440 09/01/2015 1800 09/01/2015 14640 09/01/2015 500 09/01/2015 10540 09/01/2015 26460 04/26/2016 3500 04/26/2016 8190 09/02/2015 12090 10/22/2015 13860 09/10/2015 8990 09/10/2015 36540 09/10/2015 9145 09/02/2015 31825 10/22/2015 1890 09/01/2015 14300 10/22/2015 9125 09/02/2015 600 10/01/2010 2150 04/22/2016 2475 09/01/2015 1020 09/01/2015

59.56 63.56 64 66.56 66.56 59.67 59.44 57.22 59 68.22 67.11 69.44 62.44 63.67 68.89 57.33 68 59.89 58.11 60.11 65.89 67.67 67.11 56.22 64.44 68.56 68.56 68.56 64.44 57.33 57.89 65.78 61.89 67.11 57.22 68.89 68.89 60.11 58.22 63.56 62.44 68 58.67 55 55.89 55.44 61 61.78 66.67 58.33 68.89 57.44 64 62.11 65.11 69.22 63 83.33 80.67 76.56 74.11 73.11 81.33

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 300 300 250 300 450 250 250 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 300 300 1500 300 300 300 300 250 250 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 300 1500 250 250 300 450

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

300,000.00 660,000.00 37,500.00 75,000.00 562,500.00 775,000.00 550,000.00 45,000.00 625,000.00 350,000.00 375,000.00 200,000.00 125,000.00 450,000.00 100,000.00 1,350,000.00 50,000.00 1,300,000.00 480,000.00 125,000.00 550,000.00 125,000.00 125,000.00 800,000.00 1,475,000.00 375,000.00 350,000.00 1,425,000.00 1,050,000.00 775,000.00 125,000.00 87,500.00 400,000.00 150,000.00 400,000.00 125,000.00 150,000.00 225,000.00 162,500.00 150,000.00 270,000.00 660,000.00 75,000.00 120,000.00 720,000.00 30,000.00 510,000.00 1,350,000.00 250,000.00 390,000.00 585,000.00 630,000.00 435,000.00 1,740,000.00 465,000.00 1,425,000.00 675,000.00 660,000.00 1,875,000.00 50,000.00 125,000.00 135,000.00 90,000.00

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2007 2007 2014 2014 1997 2003 2003 1990 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2006 2007 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2011 2011 2016 1995 2008 2003 2003 1995 1996

30 30 75 30 50 75 75 30 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 30 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 75 75 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 50 75 75 30 50

9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 6 6 6 6

2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2027 to 2033 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040

2028 2028 2028 2028 2029 2029 2029 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 2031 2031 2032 2032 2032 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2027 2027 2033 2033 2034 2034

Page 84 of 106

45550 Round Lake Road 45655 Verona Sand Road 43555 Lake Road 44575 Mustard Road 45685 Verona Sand Road 45790 Shales Road 45850 Simpson Road 40330 Battersea Mill Street 42190 Fish Creek Road 42715 Hanna Road 43225 Iawah Road 43510 Knowlton Lake Road 43525 Koen Road 44125 Maple Leaf Road 43675 Larry York Road 43780 Lee Road 43540 Lagoon Road 42625 Green Bay Road 42760 Henderson Road 42210 Fitzgerald Road 42400 Garrett Road 42745 Haughton Road 42835 Hidden Valley Road 42925 Hinchinbrooke Road 43270 James Wilson Road 44050 MacGillivary Road 44200 Massassauga Road 44205 Massassauga Road 44215 McAndrews Road 44335 McNiel Road 44605 New Road 44620 Nolan Road 44785 Old Thirteen Island Road 44875 O’Riley Road 45895 Sonneveld Road 45910 Split Rail Road 46090 Sweetman Road 46195 Tett Crescent 46390 Walsh Road 46600 White Road 43105 Holmes Road 46030 Steele Road 46360 Walker Street 46240 Tom Watson Road 46315 Vanluven Road 46015 Station Street 46270 Trousdale Road 42610 Green Bay Road 43285 James Wilson Road 42235 Florida Road 42340 Freeman Road 44020 Lower Round Lake Road 44035 Lower Round Lake Road 44650 North Shore Road 40540 Bracken Road 46660 Wilmer Road 44065 Main Street 45985 Stage Coach Road 41455 Colebrook Road 46105 Switzer Lane 46255 Trotter Road 42415 Garrison Court 43450 Kildeer Drive

From

Street

From

Roadside Environment

Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local

Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Asphalt Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Gravel Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Asphalt Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Gravel Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 3 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

300 1200 1000 1900 800 700 3000 300 150 800 1800 100 2000 1600 3000 900 2400 1600 2900 1000 1000 900 250 350 200 3050 3300 680 300 1000 1150 300 1100 900 1450 800 1900 2250 1550 300 900 200 350 900 3250 600 1500 4200 350 100 50 850 360 550 700 2900 1200 1700 1200 1400 1200 600 500

6.6 6.3 3.8 3.5 4 4.9 5.3 5 4 5.9 6.1 6 6.7 6.3 6 6.1 4 6.5 5.6 4.3 3 4 4.5 3.5 3.7 6.2 6.5 5.5 6.2 5.8 6.2 6.5 6.7 4.8 4.5 4.5 6.1 6.1 3.9 5.9 6.4 5 7 7 6.7 6.2 4.5 4.9 4 4.5 6.5 6.1 6.9 4.5 5.4 6.3 5.8 6.3 6 6 4.3 6.4 4.7

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

1980 09/01/2015 7560 11/12/2013 3800 04/22/2016 6650 04/18/2016 3200 10/01/2010 3430 04/18/2016 15900 04/26/2016 1500 04/15/2016 600 04/15/2016 4720 04/15/2016 10980 09/01/2015 600 08/31/2015 13400 11/25/2015 10080 12/18/2015 18000 11/25/2015 5490 10/22/2015 9600 04/22/2016 10400 09/01/2015 16240 10/22/2015 4300 04/26/2016 3000 04/26/2016 3600 04/15/2016 1125 04/15/2016 1225 04/26/2016 740 12/18/2015 18910 11/25/2015 21450 09/10/2015 3740 09/01/2015 1860 12/18/2015 5800 09/10/2015 7130 10/22/2015 1950 09/11/2015 7370 11/25/2015 4320 09/02/2015 6525 10/01/2010 3600 10/01/2010 11590 10/22/2015 13725 09/10/2015 6045 09/02/2015 1770 09/01/2015 5760 09/01/2015 1000 10/01/2010 2450 09/01/2015 6300 10/22/2015 21775 09/01/2015 3720 10/22/2015 6750 04/26/2016 20580 10/01/2010 1400 04/15/2016 450 04/18/2016 325 10/23/2013 5185 09/11/2015 2484 09/01/2015 2475 09/01/2015 3780 09/01/2015 18270 09/01/2015 6960 09/10/2015 10710 11/25/2015 7200 10/22/2015 8400 09/09/2015 5160 05/02/2016 3840 09/09/2015 2350 09/01/2015

81 73.11 71.56 73.56 78.89 73.22 72.25 74.44 81.22 74.67 71 81.89 81 81.33 72.44 77.78 72.44 80.11 75 77.11 72.44 76.22 73 72.11 71.33 78.56 82.44 80.67 81.33 80.11 84.89 81.56 81.33 70.89 72.67 81.56 73.11 71.89 78.11 84.89 84 78.67 83.11 81 80.22 79.22 73.56 74.44 72.44 77.11 81.56 82.44 70.44 73.44 84 71.67 80.11 84.44 76 71.89 74.22 76 74.22

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 1500 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 300 1500 300 300 300 300 250 300 300 250 250 250 250 250 300 450 300 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 250 250 300 300 300 300 1500 300 1500 1500 300 1500 250 250 250 250 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 250 300 300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

450,000.00 360,000.00 250,000.00 475,000.00 200,000.00 175,000.00 750,000.00 75,000.00 37,500.00 200,000.00 540,000.00 150,000.00 600,000.00 480,000.00 900,000.00 270,000.00 600,000.00 480,000.00 870,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 225,000.00 62,500.00 87,500.00 60,000.00 1,372,500.00 990,000.00 1,020,000.00 90,000.00 300,000.00 345,000.00 90,000.00 330,000.00 270,000.00 362,500.00 200,000.00 570,000.00 675,000.00 465,000.00 90,000.00 1,350,000.00 60,000.00 525,000.00 1,350,000.00 975,000.00 900,000.00 375,000.00 1,050,000.00 87,500.00 25,000.00 75,000.00 255,000.00 108,000.00 165,000.00 210,000.00 870,000.00 360,000.00 765,000.00 360,000.00 420,000.00 300,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

1996 2000 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2009 2011 2016 2000 2003 2003 1995 2003 2003 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2008 2011 2016 2016 2016 2016 1997 2003 2003 2007 2007 2009 2013 1993 1995 1996 1998 1998 2000 2003 2003 2003 2003 2013 2016 2005 2009 2009 2009 2016 1984 1998 2001 2003 2010 2011

50 30 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 30 50 30 30 30 30 75 30 30 75 75 75 75 75 30 50 30 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 75 75 30 30 30 30 50 30 50 50 30 50 75 75 75 75 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 75 30 30

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040 2034 to 2040

2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2034 2035 2035 2035 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2037 2037 2037 2037 2037 2037 2037 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2038 2039 2039 2039 2039 2039 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040

Page 85 of 106

43495 Kingston Road Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 42220 Florida Road Henderson Road 42385 Frye Road Roushorn Road 42730 Harris Road Battersea Road 42805 Hewlett Packard Road North Shore Road 43960 Loughborough View Road Battersea Road 46585 White Lake Road Buck Bay Road Green Bay Road 46615 Whitty Road North Bradford Road 46630 Whitty Road South Bradford Road 46720 Wilson Road Harrowsmith Road 43015 Holleford Road Trousdale Road New Morin Road 41470 Colebrook Road East Road 38 Kingston Road 41050 Canoe Lake Road Holsgrove Lane 43825 Leland Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 41125 Canoe Lake Road Westport Road 42550 Gould Lake Road Freeman Road Gould Lake Road 43795 Leisure Point Road Massassauga Road 42985 Holleford Road Road 38 Vanluven Road 45970 Stage Coach Road Orser Road Railton Road 42775 Henry Road Westport Road 46210 Timmerman Road James Wilson Road 43330 Johnny Martin Road Holleford Road 45295 Railway Street Wilton Road 18 Road 38 46045 Steve Babcock Road James Wilson Road 40255 Babcock Road Rutledge Road 44755 Oak Bluffs Road Alf Patterson Road 44815 Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 40525 Boyce Road Road 38 Road 38 43810 Leland Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 40855 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 42325 Freeman Road Gould Lake Road Gould Lake Road 44110 Maple Hill Way Hitchcock Drive 46555 White Lake Road Buck Bay Road 42535 Gorr Road Road 38 42565 Gould Lake Road Gould Lake Road 45925 Spooner Road Latimer Road 42265 Forest Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road 42010 Duff Road Round Lake Road 45205 Quinn Road West Wilton Road 18 Road 38 40780 Burnett Road Road 38 46330 Verona Street Lions Club Road 45445 Ritchie Road Wilmer Road 44740 Notre Dame Street Centennial Park Road Centennial Park Road 45115 Portland Avenue Sydenham Church Street George Street 45040 Petworth Road River Road Kerr Road 42295 Fox Ridge Trail 42130 Firehall Road Garrett Road Burridge Road 43840 Leland Road Perth Road 10 North Shore Road 45390 Reynolds Road Snider Road Snider Road 45430 Rideau Road Burnt Hills Road 46710 Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 42940 Hitchcock Drive Sunbury Road 40245 Cedarwoods Drive Road 38 Valleyview Drive 41590 Cross Road Bellrock Road Verona Sand Road 45670 Verona Sand Road Cross Road Cross Road 46750 Wolfe Swamp Road Colebrook Road Petworth Road 40810 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 40915 Burridge Road Westport Road Green Bay Road 44905 Orser Road Stage Coach Road 43720 Latimer Road Holmes Road Davidson Road 42820 Hickey Road Buck Bay Road 43095 Holmes Road Heska Crescent Silverwood Drive 42580 Graham Road Road 38

Classification

Street

From

Roadside Environment

Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector Collector

Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 2 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 2 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6

Length (m)

Width (m)

1600 2700 1400 1350 3300 400 1450 3250 2000 2650 550 500 1900 200 2650 400 1150 5250 350 500 150 3300 400 3600 3750 2500 6700 1000 5300 3350 550 1100 6100 2400 1000 2750 200 300 2000 2800 650 1700 850 5150 500 2200 1550 2100 2100 3200 1400 4050 2700 3700 50 500 2500 1800 550 2300 300 950 2900

6.6 6.6 6.7 5.9 5.6 6.4 5.5 5.8 6.5 6.2 6 6.3 6.8 6.5 6.7 6.2 6.7 9.2 9.2 6.9 7.8 6.3 8.9 6.7 10 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.7 6.8 10.4 10.4 6.7 6.7 6.4 9.1 8.9 7.7 8.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.8 10 6.7 6.7 10 10 7 10 6.2 6.4 6 6.3 7.8 5.7 6.7 6.4 6 7.5 6.4 6.4

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

10560 09/01/2015 17820 09/01/2015 9380 09/09/2015 7965 09/02/2015 18480 09/02/2015 2560 09/09/2015 7975 09/02/2015 18850 09/10/2015 13000 09/10/2015 16430 09/10/2015 3300 09/09/2015 3150 09/01/2015 12920 09/10/2015 1300 09/10/2015 17755 11/25/2015 2480 09/10/2015 7705 09/11/2015 48300 12/07/2015 3220 12/17/2015 3450 10/22/2015 1170 10/22/2015 20790 11/25/2015 3560 12/18/2015 24120 09/02/2015 37500 09/02/2015 16750 10/22/2015 46230 10/22/2015 6900 08/27/2015 35510 10/22/2015 22780 09/01/2015 5720 10/22/2015 11440 10/22/2015 40870 09/10/2015 16080 10/22/2015 6400 10/22/2015 25025 10/22/2015 1780 10/22/2015 2310 10/22/2015 17400 10/22/2015 18760 09/01/2015 4355 09/01/2015 11390 09/01/2015 5780 10/22/2015 35020 10/22/2015 5000 12/04/2015 14740 09/01/2015 10385 11/18/2016 21000 10/22/2015 21000 09/01/2015 22400 09/01/2015 14000 10/22/2015 25110 10/22/2015 17280 11/25/2015 22200 10/22/2015 315 12/18/2015 3900 10/22/2015 14250 09/01/2015 12060 10/22/2015 3520 11/25/2015 13800 09/09/2015 2250 12/18/2015 6080 09/09/2015 18560 10/22/2015

77.56 77.78 75.67 76.33 70.78 84.22 82.22 83.67 84.78 80.78 84 76.56 72.11 80.78 81.11 84.56 80.11 96.89 100 93.67 94 90 92.22 92.56 100 98.89 85.11 100 93.11 91.89 99.44 98.56 87 87 87 99.44 88.11 95.11 92.11 97.11 88 97.11 100 91.89 87.56 93.67 100 93.67 95.67 98 95.67 87.11 92 93.11 100 92.78 94.89 88 96.56 86.33 89.56 89.89 98.89

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 450 300 300 300 450 450 450 1500 450 1500 450 450 450 450 450 450 1500 1500 1500 300 300 300 450 1500 450 450 300 300 300 450 450 1500 300 300 450 450 450 450 300 300 300 450 1500 300 300 300 300 450 300 300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

480,000.00 810,000.00 420,000.00 405,000.00 990,000.00 120,000.00 435,000.00 975,000.00 600,000.00 795,000.00 165,000.00 150,000.00 570,000.00 90,000.00 795,000.00 120,000.00 345,000.00 2,362,500.00 157,500.00 225,000.00 225,000.00 1,485,000.00 600,000.00 1,620,000.00 1,687,500.00 1,125,000.00 3,015,000.00 450,000.00 2,385,000.00 5,025,000.00 825,000.00 1,650,000.00 1,830,000.00 720,000.00 300,000.00 1,237,500.00 300,000.00 135,000.00 900,000.00 840,000.00 195,000.00 510,000.00 382,500.00 2,317,500.00 750,000.00 660,000.00 465,000.00 945,000.00 945,000.00 1,440,000.00 630,000.00 1,215,000.00 810,000.00 1,110,000.00 22,500.00 750,000.00 750,000.00 540,000.00 165,000.00 690,000.00 135,000.00 285,000.00 870,000.00

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 1993 1993 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2015 1993 1996 1996 2002 2006 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 1993 1996 2007 2007 2015 2015 2015 1999 1999 2009 2016 2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 2003 2005 2005 1993 2011 2015 1992 2010 2010 2015

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 50 50 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 50 50 30 30 30 30 50 30 30

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2034 2034 2034 2035 2035 2035 2035 2035 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2036 2037 2037 2037 2037 2038 2038 2038 2039 2039 2039 2039 2039 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2035 2035 2035 2036 2039 2039 2040 2040 2040 2040

Page 86 of 106

43045 Holleford Road Johnny Martin Road Deer Park Lane 43060 Holleford Road Deer Park Lane Desert Lake Road 43120 Holmes Road Davidson Road Latimer Road 44305 Mclean Road Wallace Road Colebrook Road 46375 Wallace Road Camden Portland Bounda Mclean Road 43135 Holmes Road Latimer Road Old Boy Road 44245 McConnell Road Clark Road Yarker Road 4 40201 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 44395 Milburn Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 44890 Ormsbee Road Milburn Road 45955 Spooner Road Perth Road 10 46300 Valleyview Drive Cedarwoods Drive 43255 Ida Hill Road Sunbury Road Milburn Road 40825 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 40735 Buck Bay Road White Lake Road White Lake Road 40840 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Battersea Road 46060 Stone Point Road Hitchcock Drive 57440 Sydenham Road Orser Road Rutledge Road 57555 Sydenham Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road 54565 Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road Roushorn Road 42445 George Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street 55945 Road 38 Bradshaw Road 57210 Sydenham Mill Street Rutledge Road George Street 58590 Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 58820 Yarker Road 4 Camden Portland Bounda Wilton Road 18 54220 Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 54450 Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road 54460 Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road 53990 Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent 51805 Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street 56175 Rutledge Road Wheatley Street 56290 Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Storm Haven Lane 50875 Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road 51460 Bedford Road Busch Lane Salmon Lake Road 51575 Bedford Road Salmon Lake Road Salmon Lake Road 56405 Rutledge Road Storm Haven Lane Sydenham Road 42460 George Street Wheatley Street Portland Avenue 51230 Bedford Road Freeman Road 57325 Sydenham Road Horning Road 52955 Desert Lake Road Deyos Road Holleford Road 53070 Desert Lake Road Holleford Road 53300 Desert Lake Road Bedford Road 54790 Perth Road 10 McComish Lane McComish Lane 54795 Perth Road 10 McComish Lane 55025 Road 38 Kingston Road Kingston Road 52840 Desert Lake Road Bauder Drive Deyos Road 52725 Desert Lake Road High Falls Road Bauder Drive 54680 Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road McComish Lane 51920 Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Long Swamp Road 52035 Bellrock Road Long Swamp Road Cross Road 54105 Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent Perth Road Crescent 51345 Bedford Road Busch Lane 57670 Westport Road Buck Bay Road 40045 Alton Road Loughborough Portland R Bedford Road 45265 Railton Road Sydenham Road Sydenham Road 46180 Sydenham William Street Rutledge Road Sydenham Mill Street 40585 Bradford Road Camden Portland Bounda Wolfe Swamp Road 45220 Railton Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road 45235 Railton Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road 43705 Latimer Road Davidson Road Holmes Road 43360 Keeley Road Sydenham Road Sydenham Road 43690 Latimer Road Dover Road Davidson Road 45280 Railton Road Sydenham Road Cliffside Lane

Classification

Street

From

Roadside Environment

Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

1300 400 800 300 1600 2600 1500 700 2100 1650 200 1250 250 1350 1400 2000 700 2950 200 800 1550 3950 1700 1300 2850 900 650 1500 800 700 1350 4400 2200 1350 400 1900 1000 200 2100 250 150 2150 1250 300 800 950 50 1900 1650 200 1750 700 1050 450 500 300 150 700 830 1600 1100 1600 1000

5.4 5.8 5.8 4.8 6.6 6.4 6.4 6 5.5 6.1 5.3 6.7 4 6.7 6.4 6.4 6.7 6.5 7.2 5.4 5.6 6.5 6.5 6.4 5.6 3.8 5.5 5.3 5.3 6.2 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.3 6 5.2 6 4.7 6.1 6.4 6.1 6 6.7 6.5 5.9 5.9 7 4.9 6.1 6.1 5.3 5.4 6 6.1 6 7.2 7 6 6.1 4.5 6.5 6.4 6.4

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

7020 09/09/2015 2320 09/09/2015 4640 09/09/2015 1440 09/10/2015 10560 09/09/2015 16640 09/09/2015 9600 09/09/2015 4200 09/09/2015 11550 09/02/2015 10065 09/01/2015 1060 12/18/2015 8375 09/01/2015 1000 09/01/2015 9045 09/09/2015 8960 09/01/2015 12800 10/22/2015 4690 09/10/2015 19175 09/10/2015 1440 09/10/2015 4320 09/01/2015 8680 10/22/2015 25675 09/10/2015 11050 09/10/2015 8320 09/09/2015 15960 09/02/2015 3420 09/02/2015 3575 09/01/2015 7950 12/18/2015 4240 10/22/2015 4340 09/09/2015 8370 09/01/2015 28600 09/10/2015 14300 10/22/2015 8505 10/22/2015 2400 09/09/2015 9880 10/22/2015 6000 09/01/2015 940 09/01/2015 12810 09/01/2015 1600 09/01/2015 915 10/22/2015 12900 11/25/2015 8375 09/09/2015 1950 09/09/2015 4720 09/10/2015 5605 09/09/2015 350 12/18/2015 9310 10/22/2015 10065 09/09/2015 1220 12/07/2015 9275 10/22/2015 3780 10/22/2015 6300 09/10/2015 2745 09/10/2015 3000 09/01/2015 2160 09/10/2015 1050 09/10/2015 4200 10/22/2015 5063 09/10/2015 7200 09/02/2015 7150 09/10/2015 10240 09/09/2015 6400 10/22/2015

97.11 99.44 99.44 95.44 98 97.11 99.44 100 100 86.33 90 86.33 96 92.22 93.44 95.67 93.33 90.44 94 98 88.67 93.67 93.67 98 100 94.56 86.44 91.67 91.33 92.22 93 92.78 97.78 93.67 86.89 85.56 86.33 87.22 85.78 85 95.44 99.44 95.11 95.67 89.89 93.67 100 96.56 91.33 92 91.33 92.78 87.78 91 90.56 96.89 96.56 89.78 86 92.78 94.89 91.56 94

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 300 300 300 300 300 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

390,000.00 120,000.00 240,000.00 90,000.00 480,000.00 780,000.00 450,000.00 210,000.00 630,000.00 495,000.00 60,000.00 375,000.00 75,000.00 405,000.00 420,000.00 600,000.00 210,000.00 885,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 465,000.00 1,185,000.00 510,000.00 390,000.00 855,000.00 270,000.00 195,000.00 450,000.00 240,000.00 210,000.00 405,000.00 1,320,000.00 660,000.00 405,000.00 120,000.00 570,000.00 300,000.00 60,000.00 630,000.00 75,000.00 225,000.00 645,000.00 375,000.00 90,000.00 240,000.00 285,000.00 75,000.00 570,000.00 495,000.00 60,000.00 525,000.00 210,000.00 315,000.00 675,000.00 150,000.00 90,000.00 45,000.00 210,000.00 249,000.00 480,000.00 330,000.00 480,000.00 300,000.00

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

1990 1992 1992 1994 1994 1995 1995 1995 1996 1996 1997 1998 1998 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2007 2007 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2005 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 1990 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 1991 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046 2041 to 2046

2020 2022 2022 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2026 2026 2027 2028 2028 2030 2030 2030 2030 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2032 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2037 2037 2038 2039 2039 2039 2039 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042

Page 87 of 106

43615 Lakefield Drive Holmes Road Holmes Road 41515 Copper Kettle Drive Lakefield Drive 44080 Maple Crest Road Lakefield Drive 43630 Lakeside Road Duff Road 46420 Washburn Road Ida Hill Road Factory Road 41740 Davidson Road Latimer Road Perth Road 10 41710 Davidson Road Holmes Road Mowoods Lane 45940 Spooner Road Perth Road 10 40945 Camden Portland Boundar Colebrook Road Petworth Road 42490 German Road Petworth Road Petworth Road 42475 German Road Long Swamp Road Long Swamp Road 45025 Petworth Road Garrison Court River Road 45475 River Road Petworth Road 43075 Holmes Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent 46480 Watson Road Petworth Road Boyce Road 40960 Campbell Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road 42670 Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 44860 Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 45490 Rockwood Place Moreland Dixon Road 40135 Arena Boundary Road Second Lake Road Snider Road 43210 Horning Road Sydenham Road 44830 Opinicon Road Post Office Gate Lane 44845 Opinicon Road Post Office Gate Lane Perth Road 10 41725 Davidson Road Mowoods Lane Latimer Road 40930 Camden Portland Boundar Yarker Road 4 Colebrook Road 41335 Clark Road McConnell Road 40600 Bradford Road Wolfe Swamp Road Ellerbeck Road 41275 Church Road (Bellrock) Bellrock Road Mary Moore Road 46675 Wilmer Road McFadden Road Ritchie Road 43600 Lakefield Drive Holmes Road Holmes Road 43000 Holleford Road Vanluven Road Trousdale Road 44800 Opinicon Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 43375 Keeley Road Sydenham Road Park Valley Road 45505 Rosedale Road Alton Road Freeman Road 42105 Fawn Brook Drive Spooner Road 44695 Norway Road McFadden Road Wilmer Road 43870 Leveque Road Bellrock Mill Street Bellrock Pero Road 42595 Graham Road Road 38 Road 38 43930 Long Swamp Road German Road Bellrock Road 45370 Redmond Road Redmond Road Holleford Road 46135 Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street 40165 Arena Boundary Road Davey Road 42790 Heska Crescent Holmes Road Holmes Road 43345 Johns Way Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent 40000 Abernathy Road Ida Hill Road Ida Hill Road 45835 Silverwood Drive Holmes Road 46712 Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent 42955 Hogan Road Wilmer Road 45130 Princess Road Battersea Road 45745 Scanlan Court Scanlan Road 46690 Wilmer Road Ritchie Road Norway Road 46705 Wilmer Road Norway Road Perth Road 10 41170 Carrying Place Road Burnt Hills Road Burnt Hills Road 43765 Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Round Lake Road 40300 Bank Street Revell Road Revell Road 40240 Autumn Ridge Drive 41485 Collins Drive 41550 Country Woods Drive Campbell Road Campbell Road 42700 Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 Duff Road 44230 McConnell Road Clark Road 44635 North Shore Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 44770 Old Boy Road Perth Road 10 Holmes Road 46150 Sydenham Walker Road Loughborough Portland R Rock Quarry Lane

Classification

Street

From

Buck Bay Road

Classification

Local Local Local Perth Road 10 Local Crow Lake Road Local Petworth Road Local Davidson Road Local Charlie Green Road Local Local Local Stage Coach Road Local James Wilson Road Local Norway Road Local Road 38 Local Local Badour Road Local Davey Road Local Local Local Local Moreland Dixon Road Local Loughborough Portland RLocal Lower Round Lake Road Local Sydenham Road Local Wellington Street Local Stage Coach Road Local Graham Road Local Keeley Road Local Milburn Road Local Sills Bay Road Local Bob’s Lake Road Local Battersea Road Local Desert Lake Road Local Latimer Road Local Battersea Road Local Local Local Bradshaw Road Local Norway Road Local Botting Road Local Road 38 Local Road 38 Local Road 38 Local Cemetery Road Local Railton Road Local Local Holmes Road Local Lower Round Lake Road Local Sills Bay Road Local Burridge Road Local Perth Road 10 Local Road 38 Local Road 38 Local Perth Road 10 Local Lakefield Drive Local Rutledge Road Local Local Church Road (Bellrock) Local Local Norway Road Local Wilmer Road Local McFadden Road Local Local

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

1700 500 900 1900 2200 1500 1500 100 2600 2200 2000 2300 150 1780 400 450 2150 800 310 800 600 2300 600 500 1800 1200 200 450 550 750 3800 850 850 800 1450 130 2700 4200 2200 500 1700 1000 1100 1500 600 500 500 400 800 2900 770 1000 700 1200 1400 2200 700 1100 2200 1850 1200 350 1600

6.1 7 6.1 6.6 5.2 4.5 6.5 5.2 6.7 6 6.4 6 5.8 5.5 6.7 4.5 4.7 5.6 6.9 6.4 6.1 5.6 5 4.3 6.5 6.5 7.1 7.3 6.5 6.2 5.5 6.5 6 6 6.5 7.3 5.8 5 6 5.1 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6 6 6 5.5 6.2 6 6.5 6.4 6.7 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.1 5.5 5.5 6.7 5.5 5.2 5.2

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

10370 11/25/2015 3500 09/10/2015 5490 09/01/2015 12540 10/22/2015 11440 11/25/2015 6750 09/01/2015 9750 09/09/2015 520 12/18/2015 17420 09/10/2015 13200 04/10/2014 12800 10/22/2015 13800 11/25/2015 870 12/18/2015 9790 09/01/2015 2680 09/01/2015 2025 11/25/2015 10105 09/01/2015 4480 10/22/2015 2139 09/01/2015 5120 10/22/2015 3660 09/09/2015 12880 09/01/2015 3000 09/10/2015 2150 10/22/2015 11700 09/10/2015 7800 10/22/2015 1420 09/01/2015 3285 10/22/2015 3575 09/10/2015 4650 10/22/2015 20900 11/25/2015 5525 09/10/2015 5100 11/25/2015 4800 09/10/2015 9425 09/10/2015 949 10/22/2015 15660 09/09/2015 21000 11/25/2015 13200 10/22/2015 2550 10/22/2015 11050 09/02/2015 6500 09/02/2015 7150 09/02/2015 9750 09/02/2015 3600 10/22/2015 3000 10/22/2015 3000 09/09/2015 2200 09/10/2015 4960 10/22/2015 17400 11/25/2015 5005 09/10/2015 6400 09/01/2015 4690 09/01/2015 7680 09/09/2015 8820 09/09/2015 14080 10/22/2015 4270 10/22/2015 6050 09/01/2015 12100 09/01/2015 12395 10/22/2015 6600 10/22/2015 1820 10/22/2015 8320 09/02/2015

92.56 94.22 92.22 96 95.11 89.67 85.11 95.44 86.89 93.9 96.56 94.89 97.67 89.89 95.44 95.44 94 97.44 98.56 98 96.89 92.22 93.89 96 98 94.78 97.44 98 96.56 98.89 96 86.56 98.89 93.67 95.67 98.89 98.33 100 98.89 99.44 98.56 97.67 95.89 95.89 98.89 98.89 98 98 98.89 99.44 86.22 96.56 96.56 94.44 98.89 99.44 98.89 98 97 98.89 98.89 99.44 98

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

510,000.00 150,000.00 270,000.00 570,000.00 660,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 30,000.00 780,000.00 660,000.00 600,000.00 690,000.00 45,000.00 534,000.00 120,000.00 135,000.00 645,000.00 240,000.00 93,000.00 240,000.00 180,000.00 690,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00 540,000.00 360,000.00 60,000.00 135,000.00 165,000.00 225,000.00 1,140,000.00 255,000.00 255,000.00 240,000.00 435,000.00 39,000.00 810,000.00 1,260,000.00 660,000.00 150,000.00 510,000.00 300,000.00 330,000.00 450,000.00 180,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 120,000.00 240,000.00 870,000.00 231,000.00 300,000.00 210,000.00 360,000.00 420,000.00 660,000.00 210,000.00 330,000.00 660,000.00 555,000.00 360,000.00 105,000.00 480,000.00

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2042 2042 2042 2042 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045

Page 88 of 106

46570 White Lake Road Buck Bay Road 44380 Middle Woodlands Drive Autumn Ridge Drive 45385 Revell Road Bank Street 45460 Ritchie Road Wilmer Road 40270 Badour Road 42055 Ellerbeck Road Bradford Road 43180 Holmes Road Lakefield Drive 44680 Norway Road Draper Lake Road 45715 Sands Road Battersea Road 46735 Wolfe Lake Road Westport Road 40975 Campbell Road Murvale Road 41065 Canoe Lake Road Holsgrove Lane 43665 Landfill Road Draper Lake Road 40510 Boyce Road Watson Road 42250 Forest Hill Point Valleyview Drive 44365 Mica Point Road 40150 Arena Boundary Road Snider Road 40210 Ashwood Drive Rutledge Road 41185 Cedarwoods Drive Valleyview Drive 41380 Cliffside Lane Railton Road 43195 Holmes Road Davidson Road 43315 Jamieson Road Road 38 43570 Lake Road Lower Round Lake Road 43945 Loughborough Drive Road 44410 Milburn Road Battersea Road 44920 Orser Road Stage Coach Road 44950 Park Street Centennial Park Road 44965 Park Valley Road 46510 Wellington Street United Street 40495 Botting Road Bedford Road 40750 Buck Bay Road White Lake Road 40966 Milburn Road Battersea Road 41005 Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road 45520 Round Lake Road Moreland Dixon Road 40967 Milburn Road Battersea Road 44350 Meadow Ridge Road Park Valley Road 40375 Bear Creek Road Battersea Road 40489 Bob’s Lake Road Green Bay Road 41260 Charlie Green Road 41365 Clearwater Road Bedford Road 41395 Colebrook Road 41410 Colebrook Road Road 38 41425 Colebrook Road Road 38 41440 Colebrook Road Road 38 41635 Daley Road Railton Road 41650 Daley Road Railton Road 41755 Davidson Road Perth Road 10 42070 Ernie Road 42355 Freeman Road Bedford Road 42640 Green Bay Road Burns Road 42685 Greenfield Road Perth Road 10 42865 Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 42880 Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 43150 Holmes Road Old Boy Road 43165 Holmes Road Perth Road 10 43390 Keeley Road Park Valley Road 43480 Kingsmere Lane Railton Road 44155 Mary Moore Road Church Road (Bellrock) 44170 Mary Moore Road Church Road (Bellrock) 44260 McFadden Road Wilmer Road 44440 Morrison Road 44685 Norway Road Charlie Green Road 45190 Quinn Road East Road 38

Street

From

Classification

Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural

Maintenace Class Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

1700 2000 3000 1150 350 2000 1000 3150 1700 50 1000 1200 1500 100 450 200 600 1700 400 250 100 150 100 400 200 150 100 350 700 1200 400 1650 1300 50 250 450 150 400 100 450 50 200 100 550 1350 450 350 250 550 200 350 350 500 200 400 150 150 200 100 250 600 100 560

6.2 6.2 6.2 6.9 6.4 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.5 7.3 6 6.7 6.7 10 6.1 7.4 7 5.3 6 6.2 6.5 6.7 5.1 6.5 7 6.5 7.8 6.6 5.2 4.2 6 6.7 5.6 4.9 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.4 7.2 5.1 4.7 7 6.5 6.2 6.2 6.2 7.6 10.4 7.8 8.4 6.4 6.5 6 5.5 6 7.7 6.3 7 7 7 7 6.4 6

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

10540 10/22/2015 12400 09/01/2015 18600 09/01/2015 7935 10/22/2015 2240 10/22/2015 12400 09/09/2015 6300 09/09/2015 19845 09/09/2015 11050 09/10/2015 365 12/18/2015 6000 11/25/2015 8040 10/22/2015 10050 11/25/2015 1000 09/01/2015 2745 09/01/2015 1480 09/01/2015 4200 12/07/2015 9010 09/10/2015 2400 11/25/2015 1550 09/01/2015 650 09/01/2015 1005 09/09/2015 510 09/01/2015 2600 10/22/2015 1400 09/01/2015 975 09/01/2015 780 09/01/2015 2310 09/01/2015 3640 09/01/2015 5040 09/01/2015 2400 11/25/2015 11055 11/25/2015 7280 09/01/2015 245 09/01/2015 1675 09/01/2015 3015 09/01/2015 1020 09/01/2015 2560 09/01/2015 720 09/01/2015 2295 09/01/2015 235 09/01/2015 1400 10/22/2015 650 12/18/2015 3410 09/01/2015 8370 09/09/2015 2790 10/22/2015 2660 09/01/2015 2600 10/22/2015 4290 10/22/2015 1680 10/22/2015 2240 11/25/2015 2275 11/25/2015 3000 11/25/2015 1100 11/25/2015 2400 10/22/2015 1155 12/07/2015 945 09/01/2015 1400 09/10/2015 700 09/10/2015 1750 09/10/2015 4200 10/22/2015 640 09/10/2015 3360 01/01/2014

98.56 98.56 98.56 99.44 99.44 96.89 94.78 86.33 99.44 100 99.44 97.11 99.44 94.89 88.44 93.11 89 85.22 87.78 92 91.67 96.56 86.11 94.56 93.11 85.78 94 90.78 96.22 92.22 87.78 86.33 85 93.44 93.11 95.67 89.89 86.33 92 86.33 97 94.89 87.22 90.22 86.89 85.11 91.67 93.11 91.33 94 90.67 93.67 99.44 95.44 95.44 94.89 95.78 93.56 96.22 100 98.89 98.56 100

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 1500 1500 1500 450 300 300 1500 1500 1500 450 1500 1500 450 1500 1500 300 300 300 300 300 450 1500 450 1500 1500 450 1500 1500 1500 450 1500 450 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 450 450 450 450 1500 1500 450 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 450

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

510,000.00 600,000.00 900,000.00 345,000.00 105,000.00 600,000.00 300,000.00 945,000.00 510,000.00 15,000.00 300,000.00 360,000.00 450,000.00 150,000.00 675,000.00 300,000.00 270,000.00 510,000.00 120,000.00 375,000.00 150,000.00 225,000.00 45,000.00 600,000.00 300,000.00 67,500.00 150,000.00 525,000.00 210,000.00 360,000.00 120,000.00 495,000.00 390,000.00 22,500.00 375,000.00 202,500.00 225,000.00 600,000.00 45,000.00 675,000.00 75,000.00 300,000.00 45,000.00 825,000.00 607,500.00 675,000.00 525,000.00 375,000.00 825,000.00 300,000.00 157,500.00 157,500.00 225,000.00 90,000.00 600,000.00 225,000.00 67,500.00 300,000.00 150,000.00 375,000.00 900,000.00 150,000.00 252,000.00

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 1996 1996 1996 1996 2016 2016 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 2000 2000 2000 2001 2005 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2012 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2048 2048 2049 2050 2050 2050 2051 2055 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2059 2060 2060 2062 2063 2063 2063 2064 2064

Page 89 of 106

45820 Sills Bay Road Botting Road Local 45865 Snider Road Reynolds Road Local 45880 Snider Road Reynolds Road Road 38 Local 46075 Sumac Road Sydenham Road Local 46345 Vienna Crescent Sumac Road Local 46405 Washburn Road Battersea Road Ida Hill Road Local 46435 Washburn Road Factory Road Factory Road Local 46450 Washburn Road Bel-Air Drive Local 46525 Wellington Street Milburn Road Local 46765 Wurtz Court Road Vienna Crescent Vienna Crescent Local 42160 First Lake Road First Lake Road First Lake Road Local 45250 Railton Road Stage Coach Road Sydenham Road Local 41035 Canoe Lake Road Local 41290 Church Street (HarrowsmitNotre Dame Street Road 38 Local 41140 Carlton Drive Road 38 Cemetery Road Local 41305 Church Street (HarrowsmitRoad 38 Road 38 Local 42850 Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 Road 38 Local 40870 Burnt Hills Road Battersea Road Local 41245 Centreville Road Devil Lake Road Local 44320 McMahon Drive Lions Club Road Bank Street Local 44935 Ottawa Street Railway Street Wilton Road 18 Local 45145 Princess Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Local 45625 Salmon Drive Lakeview Drive Local 46120 Sydenham Church Street William Street Portland Avenue Local 46645 William Street Rutledge Road Church Street (SydenhamLocal 43645 Lakeview Drive Salmon Drive Pine Ridge Road Local 44140 Maria Street Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local 44710 Notre Dame Street Colebrook Road Church Street (HarrowsmLocal 42145 First Lake Road Main Street First Lake Road Local 40360 Bauder Road Desert Lake Road Local 41230 Centreville Road Devil Lake Road Devil Lake Road Local 41905 Devil Lake Road Centreville Road Westport Road Local 43300 Jamieson Road Road 38 Road 38 Local 41200 Cemetery Road Water Street Local 45700 Verona Sand Road McMahon Drive Road 38 Local 41680 Davey Drive Maple Drive Local 46465 Water Street Road 38 Local 40285 Bank Street Road 38 Revell Road Local 42430 Genge Street Road 38 Local 45085 Pine Ridge Road Road 38 Local 45805 Short Street Bank Street Local 40690 Brewery Street William Street Sydenham Mill Street Local 44925 Orser Road Stage Coach Road Sydenham Road Local 44095 Maple Drive Road 38 Local 42280 Four Seasons Drive Holmes Road Local 41800 Deer Run Way Bedford Road Local 44725 Notre Dame Street Church Street (Harrowsm Centennial Park Road Local 45100 Point Road Wheatley Street Local 46540 Wheatley Street Rutledge Road George Street Local 40060 Amelia Street Brewery Street William Street Local 42710 Grey Owl Road Oak Bluffs Road Oak Bluffs Road Local 41110 Canoe Lake Road Local 41020 Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road Local 40705 Buck Bay Road Westport Road Westport Road Local 46165 Sydenham Walker Road Rock Quarry Lane Sydenham Church Street Local 42970 Holleford Road Road 38 Road 38 Local 45070 Piccadilly Road Road 38 Arena Boundary Road Local 45730 Sarah Street Water Street Battersea Road Local 40345 Battersea Water Street Battersea Road Local 46495 Wellington Street Battersea Road United Street Local 44995 Perth Road Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local 40315 Battersea Cross Street Wellington Street Battersea Road Local 41788 Deer Creek Drive Spooner Road Whitetail Court Local

Roadside Environment

Street

46545 Whitetail Court 42108 Fawn Brook Drive 43855 Leveque Road 40120 Anderson Road 40195 Arthur Road 40405 Beech Nut Road 40484 Billy Green Road 40645 Bradshaw Road 40765 Bunker Hill Road 41320 Clair Road 41350 Clear Lake Road 41500 Concession 12 41560 Coupland Road 41620 Cummins Road 41665 Darling Road 41770 Dean Smith Road 41830 Depot Street 42040 Eel Bay Road 40225 Asselstine Road 40090 Anderson Road 40390 Bedford Mills Road 40480 Bellrock Pero Road 40885 Burridge Lake Road 41545 Cottage Road 41845 Devil Lake Road 41860 Devil Lake Road 41875 Devil Lake Road 40105 Anderson Road 40990 Canal Road 41890 Devil Lake Road 42085 Factory Road 40420 Bell Road 40555 Bradden Road 40660 Bresee Road 41920 Dewitt Road 41935 Deyos Road 46395 Walsh Road 40795 Burns Road 40900 Burridge Road 41815 Deerhurst Lane 41950 Deyos Road 41980 Dixon Road 41995 Draper Lake Road 44355 Meeks Road 46285 Twighlight Lane 40675 Brewer Lake Road 41530 Corkey Road 41080 Canoe Lake Road 41095 Canoe Lake Road 40015 Abernathy Road 40570 Bradford Road 40450 Bellrock Mill Street

From

Fawn Brook Drive

Classification

Local Local Bellrock Mill Street Local Bertrim Lane Local Latimer Road Local Mount Chesney Road Bear Creek Road Local Maple Leaf Road Local Steele Road Local Westport Road James Wilson Road Local Leveque Road Local Perth Road 10 Local Mulville Road Westport Road Local Rutledge Road Local Wilton Road 18 Local Opinicon Road Local Leland Road Local Bellrock Road Local Charlie Green Road Local Ritchie Road Local Bradshaw Road Local Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Leveque Road Local Burridge Road Local Gould Lake Road Local Canoe Lake Road Kingsford Lake Road Local Kingsford Lake Road Local Tobin Road Local Bertrim Lane Local Sunbury Road Local Tobin Road Centreville Road Local Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local Holleford Road Local Battersea Road Local Westport Road Local Burridge Road Local Morey Lane James Wilson Road Local Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local Green Bay Road Local Green Bay Road Local Bellrock Road Local Desert Lake Road Morey Lane Local Latimer Road Local Norway Road Local Leveque Road Leveque Road Local Maple Leaf Road Local Sunbury Road Sunbury Road Local Latimer Road Local James Wilson Road Devil Lake Road Local Devil Lake Road Local Ida Hill Road Local Camden Portland Bounda Camden Portland BoundaLocal First Lake Road Local Whitetail Court Bellrock Mill Street

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban

Surface Type Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel Gravel

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6

Length (m)

Width (m)

240 260 100 1400 600 1500 6000 1900 2600 3600 700 1100 150 1400 500 2000 100 800 200 2550 700 300 1800 400 1600 4200 4500 2100 500 1950 1400 400 500 400 2600 2500 650 3300 8200 800 1100 1150 2900 300 350 800 450 2100 3400 700 500 100

6 6 4 4.9 6 5.5 4 4.6 5 4.2 4 4 4.5 6 3.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 3 4.9 4.6 4 4.8 3.7 5 5 5 4.9 4.9 5.7 5.5 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.5 4.5 4 4.3 3.7 2.7 3.5 4 3.5 6 6 4 5.7 5

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

1440 01/01/2014 1560 01/01/2014 400 09/01/2015 6860 10/01/2010 3600 04/18/2016 8250 04/18/2016 24000 10/01/2010 8740 10/01/2010 13000 04/26/2016 15120 04/15/2016 2800 04/22/2016 4400 04/26/2016 675 10/01/2010 8400 10/01/2010 1750 10/01/2010 9000 10/01/2010 460 04/15/2016 3600 04/22/2016 600 11/16/2016 12495 04/26/2016 3220 04/22/2016 1200 04/15/2016 8640 04/26/2016 1480 10/01/2010 8000 04/26/2016 21000 04/26/2016 22500 04/26/2016 10290 10/01/2010 2450 04/18/2016 11115 04/26/2016 7700 04/18/2016 1800 04/15/2016 2100 04/18/2016 1800 04/26/2016 10920 04/26/2016 11250 04/26/2016 2925 04/22/2016 13860 04/26/2016 36900 04/26/2016 3600 04/15/2016 4400 04/26/2016 4945 04/18/2016 10730 10/01/2010 810 11/17/2016 1225 11/17/2016 3200 04/18/2016 1575 04/18/2016 12600 04/26/2016 20400 04/26/2016 2800 04/18/2016 2850 09/01/2015 500 10/01/2010

100 100 87.78 95.56 92.44 96.33 95.22 96.11 95.56 95 92.22 95.56 96.44 96.67 94.89 96.67 96.11 96.67 94.44 95.56 95.56 94.44 95.78 96 96.22 96.67 95.56 95.67 96.33 95.67 93.33 97.78 95.78 96.67 96.67 96.67 92.31 96.67 96.67 95.56 96.11 95.56 95.11 100 100 93.33 95.56 95.56 96.11 97.56 95 95.56

Pavement Area (m2)

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Cost $/m Replacement Value Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = assumed Estimate high) 5 = poor/likely) 450 450 450 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250

$ 108,000.00 $ 117,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 375,000.00 $ 1,500,000.00 $ 475,000.00 $ 650,000.00 $ 900,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 275,000.00 $ 37,500.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 637,500.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 1,050,000.00 $ 1,125,000.00 $ 525,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 487,500.00 $ 350,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 650,000.00 $ 625,000.00 $ 162,500.00 $ 825,000.00 $ 2,050,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 275,000.00 $ 287,500.00 $ 725,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 87,500.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 112,500.00 $ 525,000.00 $ 850,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 288,461,000.00

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on Risk)

2014 2014 2016 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2009 2012 2016

50 50 50 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2064 2064 2066 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2078 2080 2081 2081 2082 2082 2084 2087 2091

Page 90 of 106

APPENDIX D-2 Bridges & Culverts Site No. 63350 63560 63250 63280 63290 63360 64005 63420 63230 64009 63040 64008 64006 63510 63060 63170 63210 63180 64011 63430 63090 63130 63120 64002 63330 63370 63270 63460 63080 63070 63380 64003 63140 63320 63010 63190 63200 63020 63540 63561 63110 63030 63440 63400 63300 63550 63260 63160 64001 64007 63340 63050 63150 63310 63410 64004 63240 64010 63220 63100 63390

Name

Bridge/ Culvert

Long Swamp Road Bridge Petworth Road Culvert Buck Bay Road Bridge Fish Creek Bridge Eagle Creek Culvert Shales Road Culvert Culvert #5 Boss Marsh Culvert Bunker Hill Road North culvert Culvert #9 (North Shore) Buck Lake Culvert Hinchenbrooke Road Culvert Culvert #6 Clair Road Culvert Burago Lane Culvert Road 38 Bridge #19 Bedford Mills Road Culvert Devil Lake Culvert Colebrooke Rd. East Culvert Stafford Lane Culvert Little Long Lake Culvert Culvert Under Road 38 Bracken Culvert Morland-Dixon Culvert First Lake Road Bridge Railton Road Bridge Buck Bay Bridge Buck Bay Road Bridge Sydenham Lake Bridge and Dam Rutledge Road Bridge Church Street Culve Culvert #3 Depot Creek Culvert Watson Road Culvert Battersea Bridge Bedford Mills Bridge Sunbury Road Canal Overpass Loughborough Lake Bridge Hardwood Creek (Verona Bridge) Petworth Bridge Murvale Creek Culvert Bear Creek Culvert Opinicon Lake Bridge Mitchell Creek Bridge 12th Concession Bridge Maynard Structure Green Bay Road Culvert High Falls Bridge (Rock Lake Bridge) Perth Road Culvert Culvert #7 Craig Creek Culvert Sydenham Road Culvert Bridge Bellrock Rd. Culvert Colebrook Road Culvert Milburn Creek Culvert Latimer Road Culvert Bunker Hill Road Culvert #10 (James Wilson) Massasauga Road Culvert Otter Lake Culvert Salmon Lake Road Culvert / Otter Lake

Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Bridge Culvert Bridge Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Culvert Culvert Culvert Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Culvert Culvert Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert

Type I-beam or Girders Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs T-Beam Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Frame, Inclined Legs Hybrid Round Culvert Rectangle Culvert Hybrid Round Culvert Rectangle Culvert Rectangle Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arch Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangular Culvert Arch Culvert Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangle Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs

Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs T-Beam I-beam or Girders I-beam or Girders I-beam or Girders Through Truss Arch Culvert Rectangular Culvert I-beam or Girders Earth Filled Arch Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs I-beam or Girders Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangular Culvert Arch Culvert Rectangle Culvert Arch Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangular Culvert Arch Culvert Rectangle Culvert CSP Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arch Culvert Round Culvert

Road Class Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Arterial Local Arterial Local Arterial Local Collector Local Local Local Arterial Arterial Arterial Local Local Local Local Collector Collector Local Local Collector Local Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Local Local Local Local Local Collector Arterial Arterial Local Local Collector Local Local Local Local Local Local Collector Collector

Posted Speed

Year Constructed/ Rehabilitated

of

Spans

Total Length (m)

Width (m)

Existing Surface Area (m2)

80 80 80 80 80 80 60 80 80 60 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 60 50 80 60 80 80 80 80 50 80 80 50 50 50 80 80 80 50 80 80 80 60 80 80 80 80 10 80 80 80 80 80 60 80 80 80 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

1940 1965 2008 1927 1945 1955 1960 1981 1960 1960 1970 1970 1982 1965 1993 1996 1940 1965 1965 1967 1992 1965 1966 1970 1995 1928 1965 1960 1978 2008 2013 1962 1980 1981 1979 1997 2005 2010 2013 2013 1993 2009 2001 2007 2009 2012 2013 2014 2014 2016 1998 1980 1980 1980 1980 1960 2012 2013 2015 2016 2016

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

11.9 3.8 4.2 6.7 3.9 3.0 1.2 31.6 6.1 0.9 3.1 2.8 1.5 3.7 9.3 28.1 3.6 3.6 7.5 3.1 4.8 22.2 21.0 33.0 8.3 4.9 6.7 3.8 6.4 6.3 6.1 3.0 27.5 11.2 8.2 19.1 73.5 43.6 12.3 23.3 29.6 2.8 12.0 9.8 4.0 27.0 4.6 11.0 23.0 2.4 22.0 22.3 20.3 11.6 19.5 9.6 2.1 3.0 12.0 2.9 25.0

4.6 7.3 5.6 5.2 5.4 5.5 16.6 3.1 6.1 8.2 17.2 13.1 1.3 4.8 3.8 4.2 8.0 24.8 1.7 6.9 15.4 4.8 4.4 1.2 10.0 6.1 9.1 5.1 12.2 14.2 7.9 6.0 6.7 3.6 11.2 9.9 11.7 12.5 15.5 4.2 3.7 37.4 5.7 7.5 6.4 9.3 5.5 7.9 1.7 18.0 3.1 4.9 3.0 3.7 5.5 3.0 2.1 4.1 2.4 24.0 3.6

55 28 24 35 21 17 20 98 37 8 52 37 19 18 35 118 29 89 13 21 74 107 92 40 83 30 61 19 78 89 48 18 184 40 92 189 859 545 191 98 108 105 68 74 26 251 25 87 38 43 68 109 61 43 107 28 4 12 29 68 90

Historical Cost ($)

Replacement Cost ($000)

16655 24037 38840 7357 11080 7563

273.7 138.7 117.6 174.2 105.3 82.5 99.6 489.8 186.1 37.9 262.3 183.4 93.8 88.8 176.7 590.1 144.0 446.4 63.8 105.2 369.6 532.8 462.0 198.0 415.0 149.5 304.9 96.9 390.4 444.7 241.0 90.0 921.3 201.6 459.2 945.5 4297.4 2725.0 953.3 489.3 541.7 523.6 342.0 367.5 128.6 1255.5 125.7 434.5 189.8 216.0 337.7 546.4 304.5 214.6 536.3 141.6 21.0 61.5 144.0 342.0 450.0 $ 25,771,265

233361 22160 43572 13542 18662 11195 69678 60609 16857 63754 19542 44904 71606 81215 14621 279066 7370 21164 10103 157069 251377 11130 11661 295812 99885 148430 117766 1132096 1500000 103487 21482 139100 609168 8578 526798 115000 354213 23683 876000 14011 290000 191194 192631 107360 94579 236337 16870 26366 233000 239000 170965 350000

BCI 10.9 26.5 34.1 37.2 29.8 33.8 17.6 28.5 16.0 35.1 59.1 41.2 49.1 45.0 36.0 68.9 56.6 51.1 50.3 53.9 51.7 70.6 69.8 65.0 75.0 72.0 73.0 73.8 74.5 73.7 66.0 64.9 74.7 74.2 75.0 76.0 75.0 75.0 96.0 96.0 75.0 86.0 80.0 85.7 89.8 75.0 85.0 92.0 97.0 100.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 81.6 95.0 90.0 99.0 100.0 100.0

Health & Safety Risk

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age) 0% 32% 89% 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 25% 0% 8% 8% 32% 32% 54% 73% 0% 0% 0% 2% 52% 0% 33% 8% 72% 0% 32% 25% 49% 89% 96% 0% 28% 30% 51% 75% 85% 92% 96% 96% 54% 86% 80% 88% 91% 95% 96% 97% 97% 100% 64% 34% 28% 28% 28% 0% 92% 94% 98% 100% 100%

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Failure Useful Failure Inst Year Life (1 = low, 5 = high) (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 1940 75 4 5 1965 75 4 5 2008 75 4 4 1927 75 4 5 1945 50 3 5 1955 50 3 5 1960 50 3 5 1981 50 3 5 1960 75 3 4 1960 50 3 3 1970 50 4 4 1970 50 3 3 1982 50 4 3 1965 75 4 4 1993 50 3 2 1996 75 5 3 1940 50 3 3 1965 50 3 3 1965 50 3 3 1967 50 3 3 1992 50 3 2 1965 50 4 2 1966 75 4 2 1970 50 4 2 1995 75 4 2 1928 75 4 2 1965 75 4 2 1960 75 4 2 1978 75 4 2 2008 75 4 2 2013 75 4 2 1962 50 3 2 1980 50 3 2 1981 50 3 1 1979 75 5 1 1997 75 5 1 2005 75 5 1 2010 75 5 1 2013 75 5 1 2013 75 5 1 1993 50 4 1 2009 50 4 1 2001 75 4 1 2007 75 4 1 2009 75 4 1 2012 75 4 1 2013 75 4 1 2014 75 4 1 2014 75 4 1 2016 100 4 1 1998 50 3 1 1980 50 3 1 1980 50 3 1 1980 50 3 1 1980 50 3 1 1960 50 3 1 2012 50 3 1 2013 50 3 1 2015 50 3 1 2016 50 3 1 2016 50 3

Risk

Timing of First ReplacementBased on Risk

Timing of First Replacement (based on life cycle)

Timing of First Replacement (based on risk)

20 20 20 16 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2015 to 2018 2015 to 2018 2015 to 2018 2015 to 2018 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 2019 to 2023 based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2015 2040 2083 2002 1995 2005 2010 2031 2035 2010 2020 2020 2032 2040 2043 2071 1990 2015 2015 2017 2042 2015 2041 2048 2070 2070 2071 2071 2072 2083 2088 2048 2053 2053 2054 2072 2080 2085 2088 2088 2043 2059 2076 2082 2084 2087 2088 2089 2089 2116 2048 2054 2054 2054 2054 2057 2062 2063 2065 2066 2066

2020 2023 2083 2018 2018 2030 2022 2018 2019 2020 2020 2023 2020 2022 2018 2022 2020 2023 2019 2019 2021 2023 2019 2045 2070 2067 2068 2068 2053 2083 2088 2062 2055 2056 2054 2072 2080 2085 2088 2088 2068 2059 2076 2082 2084 2087 2088 2089 2089 2116 2073 2055 2055 2055 2055 2054 2087 2088 2090 2017 2091

Timing of Second Replacement (life cycle) 2095 2098 2093 2068 2080 2072 2068 2094 2070 2070 2073 2070 2097 2068 2097 2070 2073 2069 2069 2071 2073 2094 2095

2112 2105 2106

2109

2105 2105 2105 2105 2104

2067

Page 91 of 106

APPENDIX D-3 Water Treatment and Storage Facilities Type WTP Storage WTP WTP TOTAL

Asset Description Raw Water Intake Elevated Water Storage Tower Treatment Plant Plant Upgrades (UV & GAC contactors)

Construction Year

Useful Life

Historical Construction Cost

2005 2005 2005 2010

100 100 50 25

$227,000.00 $996,000.00 $2,971,176.00 $1,009,881.00 $5,204,057.00

2013 Replacement Cost* $ $ $ $

314,221.09 1,378,696.94 4,112,802.46 1,205,850.73

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Consequence of Failure Remaining Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 (1 = low, 5 = high) (based on age) = poor/likely) 92% 1 5 92% 1 4 84% 1 5 88% 1 5

Inst Year

Useful Life (yrs)

Risk

2005 2005 2005 2010

100 100 50 25

5 4 5 5

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement (based on life cycle) 2105 2105 2055 2035

Timing of First Replacement 2105 2105 2055 2035

Timing of Second Replacement (Life Cycle)

Timing of Third Replacement (Life Cycle)

Tming of Fourth Replacement (Life Cycle)

2105 2060

2085

2110

$7,011,571.21

Page 92 of 106

APPENDIX D-4 Watermains DESCRIPTION

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

Water Main Water Main Water Main Water Main

250 200 150 100

Water Servicing Piping Water Servicing Piping Water Servicing Piping

19 25 50

2013 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First ReplacementBased on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

5 4 3 2

2005 2005 2005 2005

80 80 80 80

5 4 3 2

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2085 2085 2085 2085

1 1 1

2005 2005 2005

80 80 80

1 1 1

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2085 2085 2085

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Consequence of Failure (1 Remaining Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = = low, 5 = high) (based on age) poor/likely)

UNIT PRICE ($)

CONST YEAR

USEFUL LIFE (YRS)

1197 4800 366 5

200 190 180 170

2005 2005 2005 2005

100 100 100 100

$ $ $ $

239,400.00 $ 912,000.00 $ 65,880.00 $ 850.00 $

303,264.76 1,155,294.31 83,454.81 1,076.75

450 400 300 400

$ $ $ $

538,650.00 1,920,000.00 109,800.00 2,000.00

92 92 92 92

92% 92% 92% 92%

1 1 1 1

1992 20 58

150 200 300

2005 2005 2005

100 100 100

$ $ $

298,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 17,400.00 $

378,510.90 5,067.08 22,041.80

250 275 350

$ $ $

498,000.00 5,500.00 20,300.00

92 92 92

92% 92% 92%

QUANTITY

HISTORIC COST

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

2013 Replacement Cost

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

Water Course Crossing - George St Water Course Crossing - Church St Water Course Crossing - Rutledge Rd

1 1 1

20000 10000 10000

2005 2005 2005

100 100 100

$ $ $

20,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00

$ $ $

25,335.40 12,667.70 12,667.70

$ $ $

25,335.40 12,667.70 12,667.70

92 92 92

92% 92% 92%

1 1 1

5 5 5

2005 2005 2005

80 80 80

5 5 5

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2085 2085 2085

Fire Hydrant Set

4000

2005

100

136,000.00

172,280.73

92%

2005

based on life cycle

2085

3,317,201.53

6368

Page 93 of 106

APPENDIX D5

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Main St Mill St Mill St Mill St Mill St Leveque Rd Mill St Mill St Road 38 Road 38 Verona Sands Rd Verona Sands Rd Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Walker St Walker St Road 38 Road 38 Water St Water St Water St Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Genge St Genge St Bank St Bank St Water St Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38

Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona

Stormceptor DCB DCB CBMH CB CB CBMH Stormceptor DCB DCBMH DI MH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CBMH DCB CB CBMH CB CBMH DCB CB DCB CBMH CB MH MH DCB MH CBMH CB CBMH DCB DCB CB CB CB CBMH DCB CBMH CB CBMH CBMH CB CB CBMH DCB CBMH CB

1800 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1500 1200 x 600 1800 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 600 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 1200 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

Structural Grade

2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2115 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075

Timing of Second Replacement

STRUCTURES (manholes) 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 40435 40435 40450 40450 43855 40435 40435 55485 55485 45700 45700 55485 55485 55485 55485 46360 46360 55485 55485 46465 46465 46465 55485 55485 55485 55485 42430 42430 40285 40285 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

30000 3800 3800 4000 2200 2200 4000 30000 3800 7500 3500 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 3800 2200 4000 2200 4000 3800 2200 3800 4000 2200 4000 4000 3800 4000 4000 2200 4000 3800 3800 2200 2200 2200 4000 3800 4000 2200 4000 4000 2200 2200 4000 3800 4000 2200

$ 30,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,200.00

99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

3 3 1

1 3 3

3 3 1

1 3 3

1 1 1

3 3 3

3 1 1

1 1 1

3 3 3

Page 94 of 106

90000 90001 90002 90003 90004 90005 90006 90007 90008 90009 90010 90011 90012 90013 90014 90015 90016 90017 90018 90200 90201 90202 90203 90204 90205 90206 90207 90208 90209 90210 90211 90212 90213 90214 90215 90216 90217 90218 90219 90220 90221 90222 90223 90224 90225 90226 90227 90228 90229 90230 90231 90232 90233 90234 90235

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485

55485 55485

55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 55485 40525 40525 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 55255 42970 42970 42970 42970 42970 40525 40525 40525 40525 40525

43495 43495

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Carleton St Road 38 Road 38 Carleton St Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Boyce Rd Boyce Rd Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Road 38 Holleford Rd Holleford Rd Holleford Rd Holleford Rd Holleford Rd Boyce Rd Boyce Rd Boyce Rd Boyce Rd Boyce Rd Kingston Rd Kingston Rd Kingston Rd Kingston Rd

Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith

MH DCB CBMH CBMH CB CBMH CBMH CB CB CBMH CB DCB CB CB CBMH CB CB CB CBMH CB CB CBMH CB CB CBMH CB CB CB CB CB DI DI MH CB CB CB MH CB CB CB CB DI DI DI CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB MH CB

1200 1200 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1985 1985 1985 1985

Structural Grade

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

4000 3800 4000 4000 2200 4000 4000 2200 2200 4000 2200 3800 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 3500 3500 4000 2200 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 3500 3500 3500 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 2200

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,000.00 3,800.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00

59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 59% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 57% 69% 69% 69% 69%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

3 3 3

3 3 1

3 3 3

1 1 3

3 3 3

1 1 1

1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2075 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2085 2085 2085 2085

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 95 of 106

90236 90237 90238 90239 90240 90241 90242 90243 90244 90245 90246 90247 90248 90249 90250 90251 90252 90253 90254 90255 90256 90257 90258 90259 90260 90261 90262 90263 90264 90265 90500 90501 90502 90503 90504 90505 90506 90507 90508 90509 90510 90511 90512 90513 90514 90515 90516 90517 90518 90519 90520 90521 90700 90701 90702 90703

SEGMENT ID

90704 90705 90706 90707 90708 90709 90710 90711 90712 90713 90714 90715 90716 90717 90718 90719 90720 90721 90722 90723 90724 90725 90726 90727 90728 90729 90730 90731 90732 90733 90734 90735 90736 90900 90901 90902 90903 90904 90905 90906 90907 90908 90909 90910 90911 90912 90913 90914 90915 90916 90917 90918 90919 90920 90921 90922

58705 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 55140 41455 41455 41455 41455 44710 44710 44710 44710 44140 44140 53415 53415 53415 53415 44710 46645 46645 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 56175 45970 45970 45970 45970 56290 46120 46180 46180

LOCATION

VILLAGE

Wilton Rd Harrowsmith Ottawa St Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 38 Harrowsmith Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith Notre Dame St Harrowsmith Notre Dame St Harrowsmith Notre Dame St Harrowsmith Notre Dame St Harrowsmith Maria St Harrowsmith Maria St Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith Notre Dame St Harrowsmith William St Harrowsmith William St Harrowsmith Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Rutledge Rd Sydenham Sydenham Church St Sydenham William St Sydenham William St Sydenham

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

CB CBMH CBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB MH CB CB CB DI DI CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB MH CB CB CB CB CB CB MH CBMH CB CBMH CB DCB DI CB CBMH CB MH CBMH CB DCB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CBMH DCB

600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 2014 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 2014 1986 1986 2014 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986

Structural Grade

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

2200 4000 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 3500 3500 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 4000 2200 4000 2200 3800 3500 2200 4000 2200 4000 4000 2200 3800 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 3800

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 3,800.00

69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 69% 98% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 98% 70% 70% 98% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 3

1 3 3

3 3 3

3 1 1

1 1 1

1 3 3

3 3 1

1 1 3

3 3 3

3 3 1

1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2085 2114 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2114 2086 2086 2114 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 96 of 106

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

90923 90924 90925 90926 90927 90928 90929 90930 90931 90932 90933 90934 90935 90936 90937 90938 90939 90940 90941 90942 90943 90944 90945 90946 90947 90948 90949 90950 90951 90952 90953 90954 90955 90956 90957 90958 90959 90960 90961 90962 90963 90964 90965 90966 90967 90968 90969 90970 90971 90972 90973 90974 90975 90976 90977 90978

46180 46180 46180 46180 46180 40690 40690 40690 40690 40690 40690 40690 Private- Retirement Private- Retirement Private- Retirement Private- Retirement Private- Retirement Private- Retirement 46180 46180 40060 40060 40060 40060 42445 42445 42445 46180 46180 46180 46180 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 57210 46540 46540 46540 46540 46540 46540 46135 46540 46540 46540 46540

William St William St William St William St William St Brewery St Brewery St Brewery St Brewery St Brewery St Brewery St Brewery St William St William St William St William St William St William St William St William St Amelia St Amelia St Amelia St Amelia St George St George St George St William St William St William St William St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Cross St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St

Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham

CB CB CBMH DCB CB CB CBMH CB CB CBMH CB CB CBMH CBMH CB CB CB DI CB CB CB CBMH DCB DCB CBMH CBMH CB CB CB CB CB CBMH CBMH CBMH CB CBMH CB CBMH CB CBMH CBMH CB DCB CB CB MH CB CB CB CB CB DCB CB CB CB CB

600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986

Structural Grade

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

2200 2200 4000 3800 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 4000 4000 2200 2200 2200 3500 2200 2200 2200 4000 3800 3800 4000 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 4000 4000 2200 4000 2200 4000 2200 4000 4000 2200 3800 2200 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 3800 2200 2200 2200 2200

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00

70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1

1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 97 of 106

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

90979 90980 90981 90982 90983 90984 90985 90986 90987 90988 90989 90990 90991 90992 90993 90994 90995 90996 90997 90998 90999 91000 91001 91002 91003 91004 91005 91006 91007 91008 91200 91201 91202 91203 91204 91205 91206 91207 91208 91209 91210 91211 91212 91213 91214 91215 91216 91217 91218 91219 91220 91221 91222 91223 91224 91225

46540 46540 46540 46540 46540 Private- High school Private- High school 56290 56290 Private Private- High school 56290 56290 56290 45100

Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Point Rd Point Rd Point Rd Point Rd George St George St Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Bedford Rd Bedford Rd Bedford Rd Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Cres

Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd

CBMH CB MH CB CB CB CB CBMH CB CBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI DCBMH DCB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CBMH DI CB CBMH MH DCBMH CBMH DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH DI CBMH MH CBMH DCBMH CBMH DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH DI

1200 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1500 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1500 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1500 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1500 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600

45100 42460 42460 45115 45115 45115 45115 45115 45115 45115 51000 51000 51000 44995 44995 44995

44995 44995 44995

44995

44995 44995 44995

44995 44995

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012

Structural Grade

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

4000 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 5600 2200 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 3500 6500 3800 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 3500 2200 4000 4000 6500 4000 3500 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 3500 4000 4000 4000 6500 4000 3500 3500 4000 4000 4000 3500

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,000.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 5,600.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,500.00 6,500.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 6,500.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 6,500.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,500.00

70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1 1

1 3 3

3 3 3

3 3 1

1 1 1

1 3 3

1 1 1

1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2086 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112 2112

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 98 of 106

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

54220 45790 45790 44800 44800 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 53760 43765 43765 50125 50125 50125 50000 50000 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd Shales Rd Shales Rd Shales Rd Opinicon Rd Opinicon Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Perth Rd Latimer Rd Latimer Rd Latimer Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd

Perth Rd Shales/Opp Shales/Opp Shales/Opp Shales/Opp Shales/Opp Shales/Opp Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea

DI CB CB CB CB CB CB CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DCB DCB DCB DCB CB CB CB CB CB CB DCB DCB DCB DI CB CB CB CBMH CBMH CB CB CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CB CB CBMH CBMH

600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200

50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 50375 40345 40345 40345 40345

Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Rd Battersea Water St Battersea Water St Battersea Water St Battersea Water St

46495

Wellington St

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

Structural Grade

2012 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

3500 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 3500 4000 4000 4000 4000 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 3800 3800 3800 3800 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 3800 3800 3800 3500 2200 2200 2200 4000 4000 2200 2200 4000 4000 4000 4000 2200 2200 4000 4000

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,500.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 3,800.00 3,500.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00

96% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 1

3 1 1

1 1 1

3 3 3

1 1 1

3 3 3

3 1 1

1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1

2112 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 99 of 106

91226 91227 91228 91229 91230 91231 91232 91400 91401 91402 91403 91404 91405 91406 91407 91408 91409 91410 91411 91412 91413 91414 91600 91601 91602 91603 91604 91800 91801 91802 91803 91804 91805 91806 91807 91808 91809 91810 91811 91812 91813 91814 91815 91816 91817 91818 91819 91820 91821 91822 91823 91824 91825 91826 91827 91828

SEGMENT ID

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

91829 91830 91831 91832 91833 91834 91835 91836

46495

Wellington St

Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea

CB CB CB CBMH DI DCB CB DI

600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 600 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

Structural Grade

2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

% Useful Life Condition/Probability of Operational Unit Cost Replacement Remaining (based Failure (1 = good/not Grade (Replacement)* Value Estimate on age) likely, 5 = poor/likely)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 4,000.00 3,500.00 3,800.00 2,200.00 3,500.00

STRUCTURES TOTAL

1,084,800

PIPES AND STRUCTURES TOTAL

3,502,338

46495 40315 46495 46495

Wellington St Battersea Cross St Wellington St Wellington St

2200 2200 2200 4000 3500 3800 2200 3500

97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97% 97%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1

1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on Risk

Timing of First Replacement Based on Risk, then lifecycle

2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113 2113

Timing of Second Replacement

Page 100 of 106

APPENDIX D6 Township of South Frontenac Facilities Building Name & Address Verona Medical Clinic - 6582 Road 38, Verona, Ontario Hartington Fire Hall - 4808 Holleford Road, Harrowsmith, Ontario Bradshaw Fire Hall - 7 Steele Road, South Frontenac, Ontario Latimer Fire Hall, 3516 Latimer Road, Inverary, Ontario Burridge Fire Hall - 237 Burridge Road, Tichborne, Ontario Sydenham Fire Hall, 4233 Stage Coach Road, Sydenham, Ontario Verona Substation - 6930 Hwy 38, South Frontenac, Ontario Burnt Hills Fire Hall - 5038 Carrying Place Road, South Frontenac, Ontario Perth Road Firehall Sydenham Library - 4418 Wheatley St, Sydenham, Main Portland Garage, 5286 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Portland OPP - 5282 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Keeley Office - 2490 Keeley Road, South Frontenac, Ontario Hinchinbrooke Sand & Salt Storage Butler, 5286 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Storrington Garage/dome Keeley Dome Keeley Garage - 2490 Keeley Rd, Sydenham, Ontario

Risk

Remaining life

useful life

1st capital investment

0.91

2062

2nd capital investment 2112

$1,052,000

0.11

2022

2072

$260,000

0.29

2031

2081

$515,000

0.49

2041

2091

$683,000

0.09

2021

2071

$444,000

0.13

2023

2073

$336,000

0.65

2049

2099

$133,000

0.35

2034

2084

$1,500,000 $1,979,000

4 1

4 3

16 3

0.01 0.97

50 50

2017 2065

2067 2115

$582,000

0.87

2060

2110

$1,659,000

0.26

2029

2079

$311,000

0.45

2039

2089

0.88

2061

2111

$1,050,000 $1,050,000 $1,968,000

1 1 3

3 3 4

3 3 12

1.00 0.84 0.15

50 50 50

2066 2059 2024

2116 2109 2074

$338,000

0.57

2045

2095

$0 $351,000

5 1

1 3

5 3

0.87

50 40

2016 2051

2066 2091

$391,000

0.96

2055

2095

$429,000

0.84

2050

2090

$1,050,000

Page 101 of 106

Main Portland Garage, 5286 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Picadilly Yard Hartington Sand Dome, 5286 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Bedford Sand Dome, 1389 Westport Road, Godfrey, Ontario Keeley Sand Dome, 2490 Keeley Road, Sydenham, Ontario

Replacement Probability Consequence Cost of Failure of Failure $605,000 3 2

Township of South Frontenac Facilities Building Name & Address Main Portland Garage, 5286 Hinchinbrooke Road, Verona, Ontario Loughborough Garage - 4264 Stage Coach Rd McMullen Beach Building, 6089 Carleton Drive, Verona, Ontario Princess Anne - 5597 Hwy 38, Harrowsmith, Ontario Storrington Centre - 3910 Battersea Rd, Iverary, Ontario Bradshaw School House - 7 Steele Road, South Frontenac, Ontario Fermoy Community Centre, 3874 Westport Road, Tichborne, Ontario Glendower Hall - 1381 Westport Road, South Frontenac, Ontario Old Schoolhouse - 5595 Road 38, Harrowsmith, ON K0H 1V0 Harris Park - 5612 Perth Road Crescent, South Frontenac, Ontario Point Municipal Park - 4410 Point Road, Sydenham, Ontario Battersea Ball Park - 5167 Battersea Road, battersea, Ontario Centennial Park - 4500 Cennial Park Drive, South Frontenac, Ontario Inverary Ball Park - 4772 Latimer Road Gerald Ball Park - 3365 Moreland-Dixon Road, Iverary, Ontario HHW Building Portland Scalehouse Town Hall - 4432 George St, Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 Portfolio Total in 2017 dollars

Replacement Probability Consequence Cost of Failure of Failure $646,000 3 4

Risk

Remaining life

useful life

1st capital investment

0.42

2037

2nd capital investment 2087

$500,000 $90,000

3 2

2 1

6 2

0.51 0.85

50 50

2042 2059

2092 2109

$934,000

0.83

2058

2108

$2,019,000

0.30

2031

2081

$143,000

2016

2066

$193,000

0.87

2060

2110

$870,000

0.57

2045

2095

$587,000

1.00

2056

2096

$334,000

0.29

2031

2081

$688,000

0.37

2035

2085

$451,000

0.15

2024

2074

$926,000

0.98

2046

2076

$205,000 $67,000

4 2

1 1

4 2

0.85 0.37

50 50

2059 2035

2109 2085

$150,000 $70,000 $1,748,000

1 1 2

1 3 4

1 3 8

0.89 0.96 0.62

50 50 30

2061 2065 2035

2111 2115 2065

$27,307,000

Page 102 of 106

Page 103 of 106

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Committee of the Whole

Planning Department

Agenda Date: December 13, 2016 Date of Report: December 8, 2016 Subject: Planning Department Application Statistics: 2016 and 2017

Summary of the Recommendation: The recommendation is that the Committee receive the Planning Report dated December 8, 2016 for information.

Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to the Committee a review and comparison of the number of applications processed by the Planning Department in the years 2016 and 2017. Year Consents Minor Variances Zoning Amendments Official Plan Amendments Road Closings

2015 75 31 8 0 4

2016 (as of Dec. 7th, 2016) 69 44 16 0 7

Recommendation: The recommendation is that the Committee receive the report for information.

ApplicationNumbers

Page 104 of 106 PLANNING REPORT

Township of South Frontenac

Planning Department

Prepared for Committee of the Whole Agenda Date: December 13, 2016 Date of Report: December 6, 2016

Subject: Park Model Trailers: Process to Amend the Zoning Bylaw to Prohibit Them in Recreational Resorts and

Implications Thereof Summary of the Recommendation: The recommendation is that the Committee receive the Planning Report dated December 6, 2016 for information.

Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to the Committee a review of the process to prohibit the use of Park Model Trailers in commercial recreational resorts in the Township. DaGKgrOuFl d n

wii@ljll*

On November 1 , 2016, Council resolved that the Planning Department should

prepare a report that confirms what amendments would be required to the zoning by-law to prohibit park model units from being permitted in the RRC lands as an option. Accordingly, the following is a review of the process required to prohibit their use and the implications of undertaking the change. What a Park Model Trailer Is:

A park model trailer, a.k.a. park model recreational vehicle, is a somewhat unique trailer-type recreational vehicle that is designed to provide temporary accommodation to the travelling public for recreation, camping or seasonal use. They are built on a single chassis with a detachable hitch, mounted on wheels and are designed to be attached to a motor vehicle for the purpose of being drawn or propelled by the motor vehicle. Park models are most often used in recreational vehicle campgrounds and they

are not intended by their manufacturers to be used as permanent residences. It should also be note that they are unique in the fact that they can be up to fifteen feet in width or thirty six feet long with a peaked and shingled or metal roof as

opposed to smaller more standard-built travel trailers. Some offer gabled windows and are often designed with built-in porches and/or storage areas many have the look of a summer cottage. What a Park Model Trailer Is Not:

Park models are regulated under section 9.38 of the Ontario Building Code and, thus, there are minimum building standard that must be met by all manufacturers producing park models - specifying that these units are designed for the ‘recreational use’ category where one may occupy the unit in each season of the year but not consistently as a primary residence. It should be emphasized that park models do not constitute housing and there is no practical difference in the use of park models from travel trailers or fiffh-wheel trailers. Park models should be regarded as simply one choice among many options in the RV camping world.

The depiction below is an example of a park model trailer:

Page 105 of 106

ffi

r-lLLjmlLJ ‘j

]

l-:

!LjF-

? wa i bwm ’ ?ii i w i u’ M l w?

mml

1 [

€ il” Ll! ffi

LJ IL-r-81

ll :s =a

l; :!;

‘Q :?? l

-jl b

‘7-

Analysis:

Presently, park model trailers are permitted in the Recreational Resort Commercial zones because they meet the definition of a “Travel Trailer” which is a permitted use in this zone.

A travel trailer is defined in the Comprehensive Zoning By-law as follows: “TRAVEL TRAILER” shall mean any vehicle so constructed that is suitable for

being attached to a motor vehicle for the purpose of being drawn or propelled by the motor vehicle, notwithstanding that such vehicle is jacked-up or that its running gear is removed,‘but not including any vehicle unless it is used or intended for the temporaryt living, sleeping or eating accommodation of persons therein, and shall be deemed to include a tent trailer and a motorhome."

Thus, if Council wishes to prohibit park model trailers in the RRC zones it would simply be a matter of adding a sentence to the definition to state that “A Travel Trailer does not include a Park Model Trailer”. It may also be prudent to define park model trailers in the by-law. Other Considerations:

If it was decided that park models should be prohibited then the following items must be taken into consideration in bringing forward the zoning amendment: 1 . An inventory of all existing park model units in all resorts in the Township would need to be prepared. This would require site checks to all 64 resorts in the Township. The inventory would relegate existing units to the status of ’legal non-conforming’ and more such units could not be added;

The zoning amendment would be Township-initiated and would require that each resort owner be contacted concerning the proposed change. Also, notice would need to be given Township-wide in Iocal newspapers.

Council may wish to also consider that, if park models are to remain as a permitted use in resorts, perhaps the minimum required site area for each park

model 2.unit could.2a..a be expanded. The present minimum requirement is 100 a .

metres (1 ,076 ff. ) for each trailer site. If there is a concern that park models constitute a Iarger footprint than normal travel trailers and would therefore promote overcrowding of the resort, then expanding the minimum size for each -. . a park model site to possibly 150 metres2a2(1,615 ft. ) would address the concern. Of course, any existing park models would be permitted to stay on existing-sized sites since the new regulations cannot be applied retroactively. Recommendation:

This report is for the Committee’s consideration to provide direction to staff. ParkModelTrailerReview

Page 106 of 106

Sydenham & District Lions Club Box 199 Sydenham, Ontario, Canada, KOH2TO

November 28th 2016

Mr. RonVaudewal,Mayor Township of South Frontenac Box 100, Sydenham, ON

KOH2TO Dear Mayor Vandewal,

The Sydenham& DistrictLionsClub andthe SydenhamWomen’s Institutewouldlike to expresstheirthanksfor yourparticipationin thetree-lighting ceremonylastFriday. Through you we also wishto express our thanks to Councillors Ross Sutherland andMark Schjemingforjoiningus in the celebration.

Wehope that this will become a tradition in Sydenham over the next fewyears andwewill do our best to see that it happens.

Withlittle preliminary fanfareit washearteningto see so manyturn out atthis initial event, especially the young ones. We look forward to workmg toward a bigger and better treelighting next year.

Bestwishesfor a Merry Christmasanda healthyandhappy2017to youandall members of council.

Sincerely

-1^

JimKelly President

Sydenham& DistrictLions Club 613-376-3515 kellyj@queensu.ca

–^& ‘‘Connie Selle President

Sydenham Women’s Institute

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.

Committee of the Whole - 13 Dec 2016 - Agenda

Document Text

Before the Visit

Housing and Residential Areas

Local Government Services

Education

Health, Social and Emergency Services

Industry

Tourism

Culture and Heritage

Environmental Sustainability

Information from Residents

Using your Senses

Quick Wins

of