Published April 2, 2019

Word Count 9683 words

Reading Time 46 min read

Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: April 2, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2019/Council - 02 Apr 2019 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Page 1 of 192

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Approval of Agenda

Resolution

Scheduled Closed Session

Resolution

Closed Session to discussion possible land acquisition for additional office space.

Closed Session to discussion the acquisition of land for the development of Senior Housing.

Resolution

***Recess - reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for Open Session

Delegations

Public Meeting

Public Meeting Introduction

Motion to Open a Public Meeting

Z-19-06 S Curtis & Landry - Planning Report for Public Meeting

Motion to Close Public Meeting

Approval of Minutes

March 19, 2019 Council meeting

Business Arising from the Minutes

Notice of Motion - Development review

Notice of Motion - Appoint Council Members to SFCSC Board

Strategic Planning Process

5 - 27

28 - 34

37 - 41

Page 2 of 192

Reports Requiring Action

Temporary Use Agreements under the Building By-law

42 - 52

Compensation for Public Members of Committee of Adjustment

53 - 54

Rezoning of Part Lot 25, Concession 13, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 179 Burnt Point Lane (See By law 2019-20)

55 - 56

Rezoning of Part Lot 6, Concession 3, District of Bedford - 71 Second Heaven Lane. (See Bylaw 2019-21)

57 - 58

Subdivision agreement on the properties described as Part of Lots 14 & 15, Concession 8, Loughborough, Lots 1-5, and Blocks 6 & 7, McFadden Road (See Bylaw 2019-22)

59 - 91

Close and transfer ownership of an unopened road allowance that forms the boundary between Lot 1, Concessions X and XI in Bedford District and Lot 24, Concession XIV (Part 1, RP 13R21915, save and except Part 4, 13R8858) in Loughborough District. (See Bylaw 201923)

92 100

Lighting Retrofit for Keeley Garage

101 102

Intersection at Perth Road and Northway True Valley Hardware

103 104

Household Hazardous Waste Depot - Use by Central Frontenac

105

Linear Construction Projects

106

Gilmour Point Upgrades to Washrooms/Change House/Shelter

107 110

Councillor Sutherland - Proposed Motion re: Proposed Changes to Development Charges

111 113

Committee Meeting Minutes

Bell Rock Hall Committee meeting held February 21, 2019

By-laws

By-law 2019-20 - Rezoning of Part Lot 25, Concession 13, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 179 Burnt Point Lane

116 118

By-law 2019-21 - Rezoning of Part Lot 6, Concession 3, District of Bedford - 71 Second Heaven Lane.

119 120

By-law 2019-22- Subdivision agreement on the properties described as Part of Lots 14 & 15, Concession 8, Loughborough, Lots 1-5, and

121

114 115

Page 3 of 192

Blocks 6 & 7, McFadden Road d)

By-law 2019-23 - Close and transfer ownership of an unopened road allowance that forms the boundary between Lot 1, Concessions X and XI in Bedford District and Lot 24, Concession XIV (Part 1, RP 13R21915, save and except Part 4, 13R8858) in Loughborough District.

122

Reports for Information

Status of Plans of Subdivision and Condominium in South Frontenac

123 130

Skateboard Park Feasibility Study

131

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing

132 138

Addressing Speeding Concerns

139 144

Information Items

Steve Clark, Minster of Municipal Affairs & Housing, re: Financial Support for Small & Rural Municipalities

145 148

Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation - Senior Services Report

149 190

Mayor’s Letter to Minister Steve Clark

191

Notice of Motions

Announcements/Statements by Councillors

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Confirmatory By-law

By-law 2019-24

Adjournment

192

Page 4 of 192

Page 5 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning Public Meeting Report – Zoning Bylaw Amendment Report Date:

March 26, 2019

Application No:

Z-19/06

Owner:

Jeff Curtis and Marie-Josee Landry

Location of Property:

Part Lot 25, Concession 10, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 4775 Carrying Place Road Purpose of Application: Rezone severed land from Rural (RU) Zone to the Special Residential Waterfront (RW-42) Zone and rezone the retained lot from Rural (RU) Zone to the Special Residential Waterfront (RW-43) Zone as a condition of consent application S-92-18-S Date of Public Meeting: April 2, 2019

Recommendation It is recommended that South Frontenac Council receive comments from the public and pending comments received, to direct staff to discuss options with the applicant prior to considering the preparation of a by-law to rezone the severed and retained lots as a condition of consent application S-92-18-S consistent with the Planning recommendations outlined in this report.

Proposal An application has been submitted to amend the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw 2003-75 to rezone the subject property owned by Jeff Curtis and Marie-Josee Landry for the severed lands from Rural (RU) Zone to the Special Residential Waterfront (RW-42) Zone and the retained lot from Rural (RU) Zone to the Special Residential Waterfront (RW-43) Zone as a condition of consent application S-92-18-S. The rezoning is required in order to fulfill condition 9 of the consent application. The applicants propose to create a 1 hectare (2.47 acres) severed lot with 61 metres (200 ft) of frontage along Carrying Place Road and 106 metres of frontage along Dog Lake and to establish a location for a single detached dwelling at 30 metres from the highwater mark, with the septic system being required to be located 40 metres from the highwater mark. The retained lands are required to be rezoned in order to fulfill condition 10 of consent application S92-18-S as the property consists of approximately 1.3 hectares (3.2 acres) in area with approximately 106 metres of frontage along Dog Lake and 229 metres of road frontage and does not meet the requirements of the Rural (RU) Zone. The retained lands previously contained a barn structure which has been removed from the property. An existing derelict cottage remains on the retained lands approximately 5 metres to the waterfront and is identified to be removed in order to accommodate a new residential dwelling which the applicants propose to construct at 30 metres from the highwater mark. The applicants noted that the new dwelling will be an improvement to the property as opposed to renovating the existing cottage which has legal non-complying status. The consent application S92-18-S was processed by the Township In November 2018. Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from citizens on the proposed rezoning. Planning staff recommend Council receive comments but defer passing a bylaw until a later Council meeting to allow staff to incorporate any comments that may be received.

Background The subject property has received provisional consent approval for application S-92-18-S for the creation of one new waterfront lot from an existing property municipally known as 4775 Carrying Place Road. The proposed new lot will have approximately 61 metres (200 feet) along Carrying Place Road and approximately 106 metres (348.8 feet) of frontage along Dog Lake and is approximately 1 hectare (2.47 acres) in area. The lot will be irregularly shaped with a depth of approximately 130 metres (426.5 feet); the irregular shape results from the configuration of the waterfront along Dog Lake. An entrance exists from Carrying Place Road, which was used to access the property. 1

Page 6 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning

The retained lands consist of approximately 1.3 hectares in area with approximately 106 metres of frontage along Dog Lake and 229 metres of road frontage. The retained lands previously contained a barn structure which has been removed from the property. An existing derelict cottage remains on the property approximately 5 metres from the waterfront. The property owners have indicated in their application, that extensive clean-up of the property has occurred since the property was purchased and will continue in 2019. The current owners have indicated in correspondence submitted with the rezoning application that the property was surveyed subsequent to provisional approval provided from the Committee of Adjustment in order of determining the 40 metre setback to the highwater mark as requested by the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT). The applicants note the 40 metre setback does not allow for any reasonable or preferable building envelopes and are requesting to build a dwelling at the 30 metre setback as permitted by the Township’s Official Plan. Staff have further reviewed the severed and retained building lots and have determined that the 40 metre setback to the highwater mark can be achieved for the severed lot. In review of the retained lot, it appears more difficult in accommodating for the 40 metre setback to the highwater mark for the proposed residential dwelling and detached garage. The applicants have proposed a septic system to be located at 40 metres from the highwater mark for the severed and retained lands as reviewed by the KFL&A Health Unit and recommended by the RWDRT. Planning staff have reached out to the applicants who have indicated concerns with the proposed rezoning as recommended in the report. Staff will continue to work with the applicants to review their options including comments received from the public. A By-law will be prepared in the future once further discussion has occurred and comments have been received. 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) The 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS promotes efficient land use and development patterns that support strong, liveable and healthy communities, protect the environment and public health and safety, and facilitate economic growth. When assessing consent applications on rural lands, planning authorities must comply with Section 1.1.5.1 of the PPS; this section requires application of relevant policy of Section 1: Building Healthy Communities, Section 2: Wise Use and Management of Recourses, and Section 3: Protecting Public Health and Safety by the approval authority. Section 1: Building Healthy Communities of the PPS promotes the building of strong, healthy communities and includes policies about avoiding development and land use patterns which may cause environmental or public health and safety concerns. Section 1.1.5.2 of the PPS permits limited residential development on rural lands in addition to resource-based recreational uses in Ontario municipalities and in Section 1.1.5.4 promotes development that is compatible with the rural landscape and can be sustained by rural service levels. Section 1.1.4.1 a. speaks to building upon rural character and leveraging rural amenities. The provisionally approved consent application will result in the creation of one new rural waterfront residential lot that can be adequately serviced. The lot meets the Township minimum provisions for waterfrontage along Dog Lake and area. Section 2: Wise Use and Management of Resources of the PPS contains policies that encourage the protection of natural heritage, water, agricultural, mineral and cultural heritage and archaeological resources for their economic, environmental and social benefits. The Rideau Waterfront Development Review team reviewed the application, during the review of consent application S-92-18-S with regards to Section 2.2 of the PPS which suggests that planning authorities should seek to protect, improve or restore the quality and quantity of water. RWDRT staff are recommending a 40 metre setback for any building and septic for the severed and retained lands. Planning staff are of the opinion that a 40 metre setback can be accommodated for the severed lands but is difficult to achieve for the retained lot given the configuration of the lot which is longer and narrower in configuration. The applicants have received approval in principle from the KFL&A Health Unit for a septic system to be located at 40 feet from the highwater mark. The severed lot is constrained to accommodate a future dwelling and garage at the 40 metre setback but could be accommodated at the 30 metre setback as indicated in their attached drawing. Achieving a 40 metre setback for the retained lot 2

Page 7 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning would require a significant reduction in the front yard setback to Carrying Place Road in a location where there is a bend in the road in order to achieve a reasonable building envelope. Section 3: Protecting Public Health and Safety directs development away from areas of natural or human-made hazards where there is an unacceptable risk to public health or safety or of property damage. The RWDRT reviewed the rezoning application with regards to flooding and erosion hazards. RWDRT staff concluded that there is sufficient area for future development to occur beyond the erosion hazard setbacks for the severed and retained parcels. County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016 The County of Frontenac Official Plan is a framework for guiding development in the County through the management and protection of the natural environment and by providing direction and influence on growth patterns. It is focused on the six themes of economic sustainability, growth management, community building, housing and social services, heritage and culture, and environmental sustainability. Section 3.3 Rural Lands provides policies for all lands outside of the settlement areas. The Plan recognizes that rural lands are used as an alternative location for those preferring a rural lifestyle. Section 3.3.3.4 Special Policies – Waterfront Area list an overall goal of the Plan to improve and protect the waterfront areas in Frontenac County as a significant cultural, recreational, economic, and natural environment resources and to maintain or enhance the quality of the land areas adjacent to the shore. Sufficient area exists on the severed lot to meet the enhanced 40 metre setback. Section 4.2: Servicing provides policies for the use of private services provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. KFL&A Public Health was circulated the consent application and have no objection to the proposed severance as confirmed in correspondence provided November 2, 2018. Township of South Frontenac Official Plan The subject property is designated as Rural in the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan. Policies of the Rural designation speak to permitting development that is consistent with maintaining the Township’s rural, natural heritage, and cultural landscape. Section 5.7.4 Rural Residential Policies permit limited non-agricultural development within the Rural area. The minimum lot sizes are to be 2 acres (0.8 hectares) with 76 metres (250 feet) of frontage along a public road and 91 metres of frontage along the waterfront for waterfront lots. Further, a maximum of three rural residential severances may be permitted from a lot existing as of the date of adoption of the plan. Lots shall be serviced by private water and sanitary sewage disposal systems. The proposed severed lot meets the minimum lot area and waterfrontage requirements. A reduction has been requested in the road frontage of the severed lands; a larger frontage could be achieved through a lot configuration that would be irregular and was not recommended by planning staff. Staff at the RWDRT recommended a 40 metre setback for the retained and severed lands based on Policy 6.1.6 of the CRCA’s Planning Policy site evaluation guidelines. The Assessment of Municipal Site Evaluation Guidelines for Waterfront Development in Eastern Ontario’s Lake Country completed by Hutchinson Environmental Services Ltd. (April, 2014) defines a horizontal water setback distance based upon site characteristics such as soil texture and depth, slope and vegetation along the shoreline. Based on observations made during the site visit, the recommended minimum distance of shoreline buffer for development for the lot to be severed should be 40 metres to protect water quality of Dog Lake. A condition of consent for the severed lot is to establish a setback of 40 metres from the high watermark for the severed lot. Knowing the irregular dimensions of the retained lot, the condition for the rezoning the retained lot was more flexible. Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw The property is zoned Rural (RU) in the Township of South Frontenac Zoning Bylaw. The intent of the Rural zoning is to permit a variety of uses including agriculture and residential. The new lot exceeds the minimum area requirement for new lots in the Rural Zone. Planning staff are recommending that the severed and retained lots be rezoned to Waterfront Residential to limit the permitted uses on the 3

Page 8 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning property; the Waterfront Residential zone also requires a minimum lot area of 1 hectare. The applicant has submitted a site plan drawing identifying a building envelope indicating the location for a new residential dwelling, sleeping cabin, location of an approved septic system, well and new garage to ensure the required setbacks can be achieved and considered by Council as part of this rezoning application. Sufficient area exists on the severed lands to construct outside of the required setbacks. Planning staff are supportive of the 40 metre setback as additional fill can be brought onto the site to provide a waterfront view for a residential dwelling. Alternatively, the site could be regraded to accommodate for the new dwelling. Planning staff are supportive of the 30 metre setback to the highwater mark for the retained lot, given the constraints of the lot to accommodate a future dwelling, garage and septic system. The proposed development conforms to both the County and Township Official Plan; the rezoning will recognize the increase of the setback on the severed lands, to recognize the deficient road frontage and limit the permitted uses on smaller lots.

Agency Analysis and Comments Public Works Department – Public Works reviewed the application during the review of consent application S-92-18-S and noted that there are multiple entrances currently on the severed and retained parcels. Public Works were satisfied that each parcel could have an entrance that meets Township standard. As entrance permits are issued after the severance is finalized, it is noted that Public Works will require each lot to obtain an entrance permit prior to a building permit being issued, and remove any additional entrances at that time. Public Works has no objections to permitting a garage at a setback with a reduced front yard setback from Carrying Place Road. KFL&A Public Health – In comments provided November 2, 2018 in support of the consent application, KFL&A Public Health indicated that they have no objection to the severance application. Soil conditions on the lot will require additional suitable granular soil to construct the septic system, though both the retained and severed lots are flexible in siting a sewage disposal system. Specific requirements for additional soil will be indicated on an Application to Construct a Sewage System prior to site development. Rideau Waterway Development Review Team – Comments dated March 26, 2019 in support of the rezoning application, indicated that the RWDRT recommend denial to the application. RWDRT staff reviewed the application for consent to severe in 2018 (S-92-18-S) and recommended a setback of 40 metres from the high water mark for the severed and retained parcels to protect the water quality of Dog Lake. RWDRT Staff recommend that the 40 metre setback can be accommodated on both the severed and retained lot and would have recommended denial of the consent application. If the 40 metre setback cannot be accommodated, staff recommend that the municipality consider a reduction in the setback from the road to accommodate the development and protect the water quality of Dog Lake. The applicant is required to contact Parks Canada and the CRCA for approval and permitting requirements.

Public Comments At the time of writing, no formal comments have been received from the public. The intent of the public meeting is to receive comments from the public. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Date of Site Visit: March 8, 2019

Page 9 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning Attachments:

Site Sketch
Zoning By-law Application
RWDRT Comments
Decision of Committee of Adjustment (S-92-18-S)

Page 10 of 192

.1; W

Dog Lake (Controlled Inter’: Edge

Level)

Water —

August

2018

UNDER mt omxnsmr. ADHINISTRATION AND CONTROLor THE cnonr IN mom or AS SET OUT DI 0RD2R—IN-COUNCIL CANADA 8067/93.DATED DECEMBER8, 1993.

88180-1370

PART 1 13R_g2_g§ IfL4A_I_

)

’

I /

hcmoy

M /

–

/.,Q
-7

\1.’\

\°:”,\

PLAN

,/\ \ 5

PART 70 13/e—17285

\ /

’

PART2

-L\

\6!’-‘\

Pl:A_r_I_>l_3R_—I7285

\ \

)

.,_

17255] ‘LL_4y_P¢

(‘“7

TIES

WATER’S EDGE onsrmcs

snmon NUM 1

’ ’ ’

“*\

1.!’

E Kl E —i

’L—.PM” 0.2-“. ‘3"

sm-43'3o’w

E “’;;’,,;::’;..”.$”;,; IE

1231.9:

PART4

-II

73-01 A

. C

at 345*

IRAQ! 9.1:

IIEEEEZI In

83¢

22 8:

41 Gzl:

SURVEY

PLAN of of PART of LOT 25, CONCESSION1 Geographic Township of Pittsburgh (Former Municipal Township of Storm‘

TOWNSHIPof SOUTH FRONTEN COUNTY of FRONTENAC A V" /

25metres

“

03 U)

-K

1.‘1000

SCALE‘ =

~.._

LAND SURVEYORS INC. HOPIUNS CHITTY

100metra

Ky.

Page 11 of 192

J4 ,=,.-1

l%)evci(‘”>1>:*r1em‘% l¢{c::vic%v lt"i;HH l\C-’iL’\‘-" iJUVClU}H!H“.’lH 3-———.m~~pé W4 W4~~34

March 26, 2019

File: ZBL/FRS/52/2019

Sent by e-mail Ms. Angela Maddocks, Clerk c/o Department of Development Services Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0

Dear Ms. Maddocks:

Re:

Application for Zoning By-law Amendment Z-19%-06(Curtis / Landry) Part of Lot 25, Concession 10; 4775 Carrying Place Road District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Dog Lake

Staff of the Rideau Waterway Development Review Team (RWDRT), made up of staff from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) and Parks Canada, has reviewed the above-noted application for zoning by-law amendment and offer the following comments for consideration by the Township. RWDRT sta?’recommend denial ofapplication Z-I9-06 based on thefollowing discussion, and our consideration for natural hazards, natural and cultural heritage, and water quality and quantity protection policies. The purpose of the proposed site-speci?c Waterfront Residential Zone (RW-42) is to recognize the intended uses of the property for waterfront residential and will allow for the establishment of a single detached dwelling at 30 metres from the highwater mark of Dog Lake, with the septic system being required to be located 40 metres from the highwater mark. RWDRT staff reviewed an application for a consent to sever for this property in 2018 (S-92-18-S) and provided written comments on the proposal which recommended a 40 metre setback for all development on both the lot to be severed and the retained lot. This recommendation was derived in consideration of Section 2.2 of the Provincial Policy statement which suggests that planning authorities should seek to protect, improve or restore the quality and quantity of water. In addition, The Of?cial Plan recognizes the need to minimize impacts to water quality by reducing phosphorous inputs, preventing erosion and maintaining natural appearances. Accordingly, policies have been included that can vary the setback from the highwater mark from 30 to 90 metres depending on the site characteristics such as steepness of slope, vegetation cover, soil depth and soil phosphorus retention. Finally, the recommended setback was derived in consideration of the “Assessment of Municipal Site Evaluation Guidelines for Waterfront Development in Eastern Ontario’s Lake County” (Hutchinson Enviromnental Services Ltd., April 2014) which considers site speci?c characteristics such as those described above. It is the understanding of RWDRT staff that this recommendation was added as a condition of approval for severance application S-92-18-S.

W01"king, ’lbg,ct11er in One 1~i1wi1‘<)1m1e11t I‘;1r|;5(..1x12id.1-Ridnm(T.1u.? hi 3- ‘:43 T19‘)

Cnn.xcrv;1lir_u1 ;\11llmril)‘| (lulzlrasquiRL*g;im1 Ni¢Ic.1L1"all<‘y (Jn11.».rur~.LIa’«>nAuthority (3l3»,(19l~~3f-371 (‘IN ‘>46–LL’.3f~~‘8

Page 12 of 192

Page 13 of 192

C’)

m JC

a:i

I-

-,fl

art

DC1.

a) o

€

‘, 3 5i $e

-h, s

(+-

@ < '

a) Cn

< N

0 J:

as c o .C

:! c

l+-

C-z a) &%(@,N’a "

(l)

+-s ;e u:

-w(p C? :$

!?“E:

‘?,aa>2 ?aa)2

ao’(1 a0 af€J

o 05: ) CL.o , 7

C:a- .J: CO+-’ m

‘E:’ E <

e).5, ? B

..ri’-

ay a) ay N CTh ff.!’

o n

3 i

foM

a) Q)x:.

:}(tS €/)

a)Z .,’ CL

o ‘?:5 ,9

‘-g

C:g.., ca’-: ?

€C

art €

(15

c o

14-

€

‘.4

0 I ‘r

u 0

z a) LA

as V

-4;’;l

J: 0) ) o

l/)l ‘Jl

!l ,‘31

l:?’-l

i,l

ffi m

(‘O

as o

;

U. (‘I, .a

€0%

.i%

o € .C: (:n :l 0 J

ffi

(15(

n C ’n

C’)

Page 14 of 192 S

(Rl

‘4-

s a €/)

art !

o c m

iN,ffU

n c m

-5

Jl ,‘a’l

(/)l

IUI

‘% =l

#%-l

:) Cr

tp 0) c

a;i J: h h

n c m cj) -

(”)

Page 15 of 192

n Co tti

3?–1 t/>9m23,,

; IU .w ( ./1’

“[‘V1Q a ,, r,

!n9S “il’fi (l -.z yn L m

-3

,3 > 4 ,2Q l,.,J:(, -u(-: Jyl., ffai C%

l,n

i(@

/‘S,

ffiez

a’ 5a

/;. 1/l

i’%-’ Jl ,%l ’lq %,j

‘J

-7-i

/’%,o ‘yi S -/! =,L U’ :j

.,5

‘S5jf%

‘? J

‘%

!J’:)

r.4 (.’ ‘g (.’ (q-

(‘C’% =,, ‘-C -+’,J r.4

i-,-, ‘g r J

nt a-0

::*i

,a €!o .9( @ aa - @

d 5 -B l € ‘a t>(@ i,;:::50 @;i :) C d

ny co $0 ,C <a o

.,g:

:!.€h€h m a@ 3

–‘G

<3A

+-, e

58 0..

x5 :J J

!: '

Ae *ia0 ,ai.mU)

, E ff W’%

,E! :: ; (iJ’

ffl,p

a’J

U)a’,i

A’ aa5.,,) - (‘a t

e :J’ €hnj

5W jb 2!)

5A8 e ,a) b

Hu 0€ :$a

s-’e

W-

;5JJJ S

!o Sm d.

c m

!, ao art

U)4 -W aAgJ 0, ‘-J (’)

ll-

‘z? ffl ?

,9(>a)

a)? n(D CT)

y, m.

a)Q

CL:’

Yaaa

€/) 0 a o

I.-

(l)

i.-

lm +i

€/)

CD C

s.i

:) n

CTh c a-t:

o 2

l.-

€ ‘0

c o a+-J

-kJ

j aM”

-=l

n c m

€/)

!111

-5

*i C’a On =)l On

3’

) (Q

’s>l -E-(t5

(/)’

:tl,i Fill ;?? q’ ,Q?

) l..l r,rri

‘Th

? (/)

im:!

U) C

’ 9.Q,, ff

’t:iil

€ %”! f:i l H oll; Z l

IU Z’ ;

a)? o

w > - ,

l:w “7ffi s.

?, s’,a:A

Page 16 of 192

/’.

-1.,J

r’,’ 4! ’ tiftj

M, 9 1,

‘) ) ;S , (

11, ( i,-A

ig i’ ‘u as,), N s– <JS ‘j k

2 ilj (” ‘,71 l)l

ii) .111 ,? l.w

va ,.‘4’, W

*i= 8

e bd"‘u€

m ,,

U)m

2"! ;5,W s

-l

iaj

{’

% %j

.,) ff’)

,1 %i

‘% 4,/

,1 -)

,) <j

‘=j3

(’(

‘,.Th

h’

r’ , .j ' , l

‘-l

‘x ‘X

-i[’

l –I %#

!,( l

C’q ‘k l-i

ii’.

!(,

e &w

S2 @<J Jle,; “eo e :!0,, –5 !€

:5:H

,E§ O'5

0 e € :)C:S

@> Vl ,9 ojfl53

.$:Sa

s"R o8-

@ a- o

“0,

=:),W ,z B

.co-

(/-

X (T,

.’s

@..

‘j’

=:4

:-1

r-. ‘J

’tJ

-.7* Th !J

‘))

-l

‘,l 0 }(&s aJ”

“J -,,l

)’

a-J /,

E e’:4 %-o *d

-,./’ l/i y:.4,j J -.)

€= !J -’ @-)

!:J

(’)

m%J

W .J

/Q,,

E cari’!’

,o J!F J)’-k 4.z ffl-

J:ka

e:J’-n

‘41

“‘a €nU) @ -m

X @13 x5

0V.X

E 105,(,; 5. -j3c. e ea,!

U)4

‘) a

y5 u’l

x k

o:i3

5fflg

-!e !!! 3

sz k ffl

u’ffl

*-zm

EzA z Q!, U).!”:

f’s,, y

-J

? r:, ‘%J

0 7i, ri., !,

L .J-

J ‘3 ,,.,u

€

)’

%,.,’

g:Qr

aa- ‘1 [

g)a)a)

U)U)(/)

o Z

.J: o as

M-ThD

‘o ! e ! :6 tp ..C

l g ;g ‘g § m

T 1% ff

tm 2

l’o

o O c

’n

ea) i4 &“0 @)

OcH

,3

O 0

/’l rrs

/‘I

)’->)-

(/) o

‘Sa

8 0 aS[

..C o

(1) !I a) al o.5

3)BBB2g

p ‘FE S 6 6

..C

m M M -j M

-l-l

ij: &= €TJ e €TJ

o:J5

E 3&- ?. ifl:k-@i

0 0

%q s :3

%l,’-8

€/) l g€

,,R

ffi

:5a

ffi

, B ,52 Q ,ffl ?? 3 " W @) ‘:>&;l Cl J)

*-tea

:!€0

-a’:+ n? }= 3 Q ‘:i W

th€J

e,: ‘90"0. 6 !:l ‘:’: €5 €/) Bffl ‘H

:a’

E ?uy

Clii;

a5O

a) l a’g 5i,,g

s

ffi

(g5, s. n

Q’) C:’

z2,;

z? :5. :)

5e5 co r

‘J

,lo’;

E ‘:?y

.: ?a-a(k?-

S da= :> i ,iA rC><’@

iNJ €!;Li:

%, p ? y i IJ, x

O- ‘- l i–?

=’:iii

;4,,-“il

iN M? -O l ua N a i

!!il?

Page 17 of 192

lf’)

Page 18 of 192 S

2 y"0 q@ $E

a)

mo E

?O art

-5 m

I-l-}

o o ay (D

(l) c a-; C o o

a) m J:

3 n c m +’

n c m

ll-

.J:) ) €/)

-5

O a)

:E :) (/)

tp .C c 0 a*

€7)

:‘I

1:,

9:$ l.-W

z25’ B

?z ?o -EEi ffi

ffi

(l)

o :: a art (/)

(’€/) C

ay J: -k-’

lh-

(O m

a a m

a-€

c o

n C m

-W

I.-

n C :}

o :? (t$ o a a m c (u

-l-j

€

a;i

:) c

ffi

il:

D; :5(: €/)(p tll €/) (3;>U:I

; -w0

I.-

li:

ay €

art

(/)l

as €/) €t$

Cj)

c a;

(l)

i-o

o m.’!

C)i

‘-

‘il

96 R Q’, 6 U)

(Q a)

-i

@(JL” n,% C: -@l v Cii -l

E ai

-i-C

O–

om6 a l !:‘C)> r.

3 art

3 ?!) ?0 “El :m 5"tn"aao ??-l3s*m.

r-(J)JC !?‘a-I J:cCl- li Ea5E !-l ffEcl.

!!,CL

LO C%J

-i-a) $J:

,,-

-Jl

C’a, ‘a-l–l

(fl4 -li .;i (Q

o)(15

’t (%J

B $::5 ? ?’? 5B ’ 5? -9i B ‘r

‘j0*o ’l!

C3n

N N

ra -Tl -m*w ? ? € a :>

c%l

€”) N

() Q > l’l-

‘:i

C’J

€/)

JC:

1+-

U) 0)

ffi’,“y mi ffi§% ‘jn

-!-

:} n t)) c

V C)l (l)i

a52: .3i

+-I

-5 4’

(‘0 n

(D o

n c

m :)l n c

o N

B:U

‘r

Z,o

u.*: :l <,>ff

3 q, ‘77B fi ,’- @ ?-l

Q’g ,3 a Jffl

a? 3 am

< a)

:5 (/}

a).”

art ..C

-W(/I

a5”,/I

?‘C)

(C)

Page 19 of 192

C: 0 :+:l o a

a (U c m

(0 N

U) )

m m

ffi

ay J:

‘0 C m

I’N

€

[’

Page 20 of 192 S z

g'0

.1-I

c )

E m

-l’

a:i J:

c o

(p?

zasg

o 2: ? €t5!Ca)!:)

(Q>

:,, -%,

% ? w

O:},0

(l)0

a) ns ‘!

? l- a:

Cl-C

a’a?” E “9;’ CI J-l (. %- t’i rs

8 0 oo CC

OO n

c!)2a’ ffieo:i (pm?C:

JEI i.- ‘7?i n

€Th:Q8Q

J: % ;

a5a o :3a) " a. Cl>

cw>,3-s,

as m’ffi’a?E

–me?nsrs

@ 33. ? -<‘a: .,”-, ! R,

r:ffia)?Qca)0:)

0 - - J)

? C!> m ‘a0 i!“mK 1- nl -r* m ‘Oo = !3 m

? C ? ()

CThm=g

GcE> -!== a t )%

eHba5

@ :q .0, n,

-= “c :imO C;; ? !o ‘a’ ?

)Ej a ‘p @

-”- a :) 0

38EE

-(TIO

C ?. l*-

O S a)

7= K ‘EH’: E$5s

€/)5, o

C ?9 s

?? ? 4.i

‘-a) =a(::’..C

= :?

:)”

;O? ! E t .Ca’ :)

‘-:O

+-g 0)g

j)-

Oo0

5’? En,= w

l=iO

. .G € j:() @

a) E 6 ‘?Q. .Z ?-3 I:I:$ :Em;m

c> :?m aEE:J– .?6 3 ‘CL’ O a’ao% o .?%i as .0 (1) .9

‘a) :2;’ jg’ E

g’, i 7a% .o

;J::)

,9 €O C:

m>.’-

!‘i e aoO’a

‘.5m

:5 l-Ij

0 -.

t; O (;@

??== 3am ?i+., s(p 0, -h’=

m ?, CL

E EE co.o?, a?S K ’n .s0?v ‘??? rm>mA N’ E 8ac7n ! ‘-a?“C:

< z = " ‘;- CL.!;

uH’E affl/’? CL (6 N :ll

-i- Q

2 7z ?,

o3)v a

J: %? U) E

{- -w (.

rT ns 44 cr a) “,

a)ffl ‘:I ?‘5 j’

“a a:

(1 :)

a) ! - -

a3”

2F?? ’e ‘a)’ ca ?D ‘ffi’ 0 ‘J’ Er’ m” o

, ,’ C:

(1)Ol tp

‘,,9E,@ C :.j a > B a2 .?o 5!! rs m? CL’

a x 0 0) ? X

a)).C5: (;; a4:i’ .9

–

E ‘0 ’ ?

,a .9 aE .9) ?H L :’;’ aC- s p’ 2 u

-@ C ::

171 ? l-L (4 ;5,% a, $ ,B as ;?e

U’) U) ?. @ CL

art a)

% ffl #

9 0? C: u €0 m mC,O

c” s, ffi

,-E

a) m !:! 2% ll-o .@ 4, 0. aa2

-2 2 E

(1),,9 ma) .?a) ?ffl

a6J

a)m aF. f €Da5t’T C.rf:.(J(3a) .Q .5 (D O 5t5 - ‘)- a a-

r:r€ ,@ o N c ju Q5 "” aD’ ..C’ m j’

?. 8 € ;? 5’E

C1.?

,?o aN ‘g2 ,? oa,

m(3 ..ra= CjQ L ?" € .0 .c O r- C

,. rri m aTa, O c. ‘aaa(1) ‘f?? m a’?g mo

0,a)aCO

U:)-> (l)T)(: !:OE e?5CEFsQDo2 €/)C:g0 (flm aC7)0

(O - ’ (U u>

“mU)“0 E(D ?

, ffi, (/)a)

,o m oJ;j

j) -

“c(Qc ao!!- m(. ;? (/)a- €am

(3:)) a€ s

gk ,,c ? ‘ans ffiE??oe mffl ,co.. n ‘a?>o a)>“a’ ..C O a” a ,a) “X :, K= na *zBmx;.33?

X -,- E ., X aC a) # ?’

:a5m

a a

< €O d) :

n ’ g)

(l) w -, tp a x (@o

E € (05 s

5mai -’ ? (Q

-C:. a)€tla) €-,V

(l)+-

lh-

WaS W!?

" C- j-

5q4)% (U 4) U)

m(B 5i

,o CL%; X–

‘o c

? ? ‘aCl

c f? g: ‘a’c (f4

s- as w

;e:’@ :B,

ay c art ..C

O €0 C: a)

ii§

E 0) C

l.-

tlc

(5a)0 CL’,

O a, C

o N

-h,i

z@ x4

Clc Qc :ia

:g >c o a- U) U) O

5g E- 0 s

art

:,-0.ffl o)n .C. =s > O ?o j;?? .?’

? ?-s (o

,5?c: m ?i –.CL E c s @’?

E’)D :ji’ aE!’ W

‘)D :js P 2

O !tl aCl ffi m (6 4’ 4’

.E .9 0 t:

:’§a50 n98 ff- a:w ela

mc ?Ba.? Ng a’ ! a?a "

€/)

" ffi a’o o Cm

;.00

5mf :i ?- I- ,

(. 0) ? (

J: (/) c

o o

ay n

a)i

ffl

c o a-h;

a)3 JO?O

% ?’,??? Q (1, 39 m

mO B,;

,54) 2a

o h

o (/) l+-

QB 3 m f

00() (!)9 %leh S

25 z? UJ Lu LLI

96 N?

Z-: W x’

0= a) 6 .’=’ a8

m .@ !L, U) ? ? -? a) :>’ as

(l)ga)(

:7 s s

‘I- -” Ul s-.-a-€/) IllTh

C > #

!i oa” a O

?8@() C, ‘5 2 a@. mO )C’a ?!!’ ctl’l -ffl E3$

—ffi

l- ‘x:? ?

9aA ! C7}” ‘o a” <-" C 0

ffi’ ,CI Z% ,C)

:>0

a) ay

-5

:)7))c

3,u24 x.3,L

:: a) o ?cl j31 -?

-C) €Q’s rs J§

14-

..C

u.? ,u

E! a -hJ

Cr CT-bo

€fl

8- §? C5 F% a)

z (!) <

,%g

d ‘=

:‘5’b Ss

o? % art

0 (/)

)-LL

(J)w .Cg

-E

a)g 0

%1,, %W ffi.

(, oO < i

C m o

4-’

,(/} E C))

(. a>

2'5!,

-’- a

.9 C -’?@? a??

Ck.p

a (11 a) m co (Q

J;,g

–)- ‘? 0( -’-o nO a),,.-

2SQ

i)N ffiCQ SN <M

Page 21 of 192

$,)

d-a

/S (:)

j..

d->’

‘[o

ff o

‘Q

l’)C5 155(:i ’n r

o(il6 .%k

llloo0 s-r!< Cilrii<

15IJJ 5%

s 5 k -. :O ! :, :<s U. -!2 K! < 5aio

Z S<

(Er 0l%tJ Q ;>

,0(% , p Ci S.a, % 11) s

’l > ‘io -’s., 3, o ;= ,,,,o,,,%-

k
1:*X
o
b
Xa’DE!,.‘rq
Z
b ro Go
o:<ff
Sr§“sR#
?‘a
JS: =i K Ps’>” (%2o; g I6 D% #Wo’gDo Q “i’l ag “”’:3 ‘EGaai

a < Sr% o+ Q<;5:2:o-s

k(p

i6(l 5

(5, oo i

2>’;‘D

l:)!z,@)

C<5 EiK:>y =l” %o )‘s€- p :3 5 %,,o ‘o ’ 8 H Qos S ’e’ 9a Q- § CQ I:> a- ' Bos4zD ’ Z ’ ’ O a X Y X %+" ' b 9) %. 11,> -b ' ,’ ! :3 Z 2 ‘oE:t;,HE’,:?Yll.o z! (5 O’d6 rE! *tg’ri e O909’ZZ-D Ny,,53 E 5k 76 Wl g 5J, a.,

W ("‘6"iXbo,X’a’j;;’s <S%Cl, , 1,4’j 8 d;,79%n.u

–l%;l ‘@ Qi (/J 5, (/] sQa(; }pA ha6,uo’Lfo’>9’ov o "" “o S " s; ’ f :(‘P2 ‘2. 8Q,? 2 t N 0 *o.ll, 0 )o’;!; @ 6’-a

,,9 % ! <rz., %ai-

(,>

iZ?li ' B@’[‘24 Il,,

% @

(y Glo” ‘g N. E,, C@rOqo’::.;;, rX ,, s Q JJ,.61,, . X 80 Hoaa AllouyagAoc": netwem Lots 24

(;"’

Page 22 of 192

t’o c a) !

o ffi

€

o ffi

9 (" C

(/-l 111 ?

0 5!) -

,gO

a 0 E ( -, C N (? l-(N

:E a)2 0 ?: (:) z %o ui(!) S

3 rr)N ‘@ :I s ‘6 > 0

ffi * vi V

E l.-

ro CL at

Cl 51) C: c c ro CL o S

o ); ro CCI ‘:>

A art o (/’) n (f (U Q

art

n art C: ro W

o u

J? u

art ff

C ? ?- n

(i X % $ ?’, 54)

," e ’ E

(‘0 ,l? un

,ai uai S

m - .:

aua’ aC:i ’ >

,>a) ?!€

(5o-j5

g, N i.tima’

a’C'0

?>? i wc

!! “,

ma3 =?o ??mfi?5C:> u m 4 ,? 2. ,o

(J(/l

a’ o 4? CL: 4wC)

Q) - (p .-u

! l/l

OJ4’

<‘o

t=:e,s-y

airo-O

i+- ? % : C

=T E a? ‘;. ?u-

art

0 l-l?

. -

€ art Q

)

“6

ffia)> i.n jl 0 u m,,

o bJ)‘a@ “’ (J 4?i

.C ?(p,

€Dy

l/lQ.l

? -

@) C iw s

0,)J:Q)

ffi EU (0 ff a 4?i 3 cr3 Ev*z

() hart, “m h

@ (‘0 , (Ll.

@) IJ (? , )’(‘0’A

,fa’

5Da)?-

:z:

(‘0> J:0

; ,’ 2

c. Ea) m W

‘C .” a) f(u

a)(6

-Vl

%j)

..:V:1 ??z a at :‘a)

?(. ?c H. Ou-

? ? a,i ? u

C(p

!jE 0)

au”: 0 m M <

JO?

ffi

a 0 3 ,.;

o o -F5 ??a

E,, ?3: ?? 0 <

E ::9 u q

l- -IJ

(aI C? O C …

<r:c

Ou u4’ : ,,’

y u u u ? () 0 y

?g; :l.io? 3 ‘;(,

ro (3)j5? ! ‘fl CL

“, aw X :C1 @) CL a) a) (’ % ‘: ?m ?ffi : ‘4? , =0

-???"(L) ‘?* ,?

.’ (7) s @)

CL u @ D

art (?llj

(Ua) 11-l llj ?

‘0 ! j

ju ?’, ,,:’ .ffi’a’a-

L,b%

=ipa

E.:

J: ‘, a) 4,1’-11 n

0a) ZGJ-

a-l a w O (@ a.) m M (’ (1

j)= s c, ?@ E

@) 4-l m

art

‘N

’l- s- > !

. ? I CL @) (‘0 0 . ! s J: h > (? - -

:i ‘, !S! z m at

0)f

o 4wlJ

a)a >‘o

!i(0 50 @) ?’

?0 O o”’,

y “, m

‘a) ? rCl +J a) y’i :

aly avs E m

E .:5 (f

E ?:€ ‘a

? (1i E

(J w a-

(/l , 4w ffl?E

Eai

0:); ,c?.(t)

ffi ‘8

art

(Y)

D u’) a)

h -

‘aC)C

at),0

w)+. w

a) g lj(

(1 ;W w a

i ! m ;:

ffi

" () 51) C ‘fll c 0 CL O) -: -:

w s - -

,ajHp

H w (tl

‘a, 0 E’ 3h

T:i ; -3 a.i ,E > ?? ?o

a’z? E s (t)c

‘! : C: ) a) 0 -” 4’

J::, 0 6 -; !’(i:l 4w 4-I,

ci:,z

a’ E ?(Yal “’(‘0

?o t-o o?’ ?”

C J;: jll 4;

C ? :) uQ ?

B 33 ‘(? ?‘u 06m

.E a) ‘a)’ a4:i’ -Q i.E k

-:,-, a) ‘o J m 5D a) -. € :”

:ro e(m hh m a :)

C l/) l- IJ 4w

art n : E (‘0

g : t)D

m -.- ?

-l-l (@ s 4-I(@

rcl ‘) ?,, a) c.

i7-ij) (@ ‘aaau (p

8 -= 3 (U C t)Do0

ffic, rua.= .,C o, oaE, at

(:C> (Uj)

l?la’–

J: z 3

510-’m

‘a (? c IM ?? *?? 0)

‘ffl

?. ‘- (D art 3 Q) ‘07) a) ??

t/’l)

O I’ll 4 ai0 ffi

fl? ?i m=

u %a) > @) ..o :=;

–

Q(5=i ((@n

€ m C-

h ? a

a) 0 : Th-a0

2 ‘U ‘i

.> 2 4 !:, j?

a)’ 0

:J:)$ !C

ag € E ‘z V?’

(/l -: CL ?’(/I (/)a?? ,? al!’!‘C)

h n (‘0

o U’) ' J:.n

‘Fo =B ;o ij!:!E oj m

art 8 ‘cl ) ???

(’:l€m

i4? u 4?i ,w- ?C

*v (? (JJC. ?m C E

(/)7

a)c’ oA 2i” )a ME: (tl ‘€ (tlj) j)"" '

w :} 3 ,!‘O j) m :) @,) u’)

cm Ei ,‘O j!:! ?’ Ou ?v = ?m ‘i

94 J: 0

p 4, ..@)?, ,?u

0 () J: >

Cg0

aa 0; r0 @) ; j)

-, j) n:l ()

CLl4-’

uQ)

v q i C 3 ffi

,’ % (l) W. () C

(tl ‘j, €

C a) m ‘a

‘..

a)a)

7Be to

w ?o rY)

a?" ‘(" eC ‘CL o@a 4-IVI

i 9 -3 B ;

S m >, a; -*

ai?i? C: o)n a) - T) 0 ‘-a)nO

“:3’ =V “a) E

4 q (,) w +J " !”, f 0’ O’cC ,’ C J:5

i.hC)

J: ‘) g)

0 (,, ‘i 8? u

+J w -O al o ??cD t, 2 ?o?o o?u

E ,o l.: ’t: )

o ? ? (I), f i C a) u m a u’)

%? ,?’?r.am ‘a,, )Cr ? 0) ? oC our .Co G j!:!’

X E ,’ y

Lo .r ai”

.?‘CLE

a)0

*3 2H3

E rO .‘a

a ’ -.

ffi

()Oa)

s : p (‘0 ‘-J:

Q)C o

q’ (:i ;@ tii? ?m (Ll .?

:) (/)’;. m

4-I -:

ale J:0

(11 ?’? : ? ? a)

jE C: -V > tri f ; ‘,

y @ (J < –ll)C, :3) =a)

b C :; c

?’ n (D s

“, E) ,’ a) ’l Tl ni E

?c iati? E ?aza

5,E E@,it(C

‘ia'3? 2 j ‘5?

m ui ,’ ff

3? l; co,. ‘?: 11-C

0 o? rs w al:? : Q

(?, a,;= s E

‘;o ?= ,,,“a’ao’E

:’- E v o

v B -;; () n l a;; o E"i 5E'5a’

() E O r, a) g 0) iw J: ‘;2 5? s

“U’),?’ Oa’a 50 -,

‘= ’ C- o j)

?‘o’ !X’o ?>o ag3 a) c,, hlai i 9. 4 ,,a) Eo m-:

‘:‘Ei€ fl:D’!e ‘5 eCLm xai?

!:!) a ,1 z tri ? ? w ui

(. C 0 ‘Cr w

l 3 C

‘a’= w > l-

s -a’!!?ffl

(3 a) € .’ a @)

, i-w € p

!!l ?

() j- > < E

CL 111 :) :

Cf: C () 2’ (@

C -: ai3 Q.I5

a)mO” r- 4w p hO " 0 : C OC w

€ “c ?0 :)05#

Cl n " '

ES!‘az § E,‘E:,)€ ’m “: Th

mc 0, J h o,

4’ 3 f at/) ro , :) C C’ ?9 ja @

3 3 a’ v, ?EF

(g(‘0

(U ?. ? o”

E E az a; ,%c

Z O a) E o S :j) avi .E

:E?m?”’(/l ,?.?”’??IT

‘:,-7) s +J’ ‘0 ,§ ? (/)?=, ffi Q) =() : e .E IIJ, E ?x

0 0- E a

;a)) E ,’ !. a t7i G !!l (‘6 ?i jI a)

a) -E’

i? C"9

C ro CL f ua)

45 ‘C) ‘; ?’

B E E,%”"

-I-I u

;kr a’n

5ai

C:) (pCr l/l

EP < ,(t)

=‘5 i W

a’-l-

l/l

‘a?. Eo? oo=

C Ce:= ?‘a’-H

-a)

(i (‘0. w “?3

? 0 (fi a) " #

(@,(%I

<C@.s (30

a § ooa

(‘Cl@) u4w :m

:

a:l(t)

h q4w

u Lfl h h

(/)l’

00 ? N m

V C: o u

ro 0 a a

< u

C: a) l/l

,,)(n (5-,OJ C4:

“’-Z Q)a0 o (,)

()(tl CL < m

art art Ce:

Page 23 of 192

art

3 s n

a)a)a)

E’ a0. ‘I- =o u+=

pa) (‘0<L!C: ,?,’- 4-l ?

? ?(z ?

“) 9 j)’

.(‘0 ,u s

€ at Q ro u o

? z , ? c j)-! C::=

4 ; ) l/)

E €” a’ t’o

? ?@ a) .t’

roai’::

e S ? @) C X n,

!!,! 3 ffi

::j) s

E@,i .1 ! 6’= B c> ?,, 4J (z Jj)

,a’ a, i 4’ c ()

0 0 (q

JO t’o 54)

C-

(/I

a art art

C:J:

(g > a)

!.!! E (L) i:!

471

art (

:) ro

-l-l

(t)

a at Hlh

3 4-I -a a 51)a)

34 ,() e, ‘, !,, ? J,-a

C C 51)

w ‘:5 a -C) M

(@ < ? ? al

? a’ -Zi o’ M go>%:j ffi e -,; v @)

, -I? t/) ff ?? ?

-51)

j5a)-(‘Ci (ti : J: al.

j’- r a "” ’e

a.)

l/l

a) l-ffi

0(X’?C?c

‘5; 3aaG ‘? a’ al " 2,9i’o

C 3 a@ +J :

(/I

n at

ro j)

m (71 ?C) a)

e ; ,c >

E :, u’) 0 a’!’*’

4’m4-l

.e? s3 %” eD a8 art

C: o

2wf.

m j)

-l-’

art

i?? E ?? ?

aa -? n ni aw 9. a0 (1Q .g?’, C.C !) 7! art

‘i m

ro m s 47

o? :;

l’el

E C j" a@

C ‘Tal: a F, n a) ‘D :) ‘-w

3 0 ; '

; !?J) :E) ‘D

m 2 @ e ?3. CL,’. R. o)

-? c ? -

Cr ff ( IJ 0 C? €

h0 s 3? ? ,C C h0

a:l . CL 52

N € .= ?0

0 " u )

ac? ?? (’?- e

e t?’?x a3

0 g In C

C’/l

0 :,,: 0

’e () 0 ‘on

J: 3 ;?,,

cl. e CU % (i LA C. () o- 2 ? -C

< ui tri CL

? (%J rri *

‘%

:) € c a) n n

q (/I J) 0 E ; J)

a) c" ‘o J: a)

a (/l

(: 0 ? o, a)().() 4

ffi ffi

‘?

k ‘h

l/l

n c ro

‘?

l/l

art art

n c ro

(C9n < Q n a CL= @) ()

Q) Cr (p e r? (‘O

y 4 (15 al ?Z ,,’

J: a) y " 4J 4?i 4 i6 (11

(i “‘C m= (ti

‘i ‘(i 0 0 .ffi i-o

: a’a

a a

3 ?u ‘?’ Ei € px M s, ?.= 0 s 7 Cla)

51 .’e K l Uo ‘a-g g'0 t> a ffl ffl €, ?-‘4

a'6 2 e ‘; m l/l l/)

(J’

art 0 c

Ual

‘i s ?’ :(’.c ::# ‘oc'2’ffl

(t) iii

C(/)

art

-a) rOy ‘-m

’e

a) a-??

o)5j)

0 ro

‘? ?o

zm f

+-l

0C: (UJ:

j:al %..0

u c (‘O f

ffi

(/l

.)a) u

;. 9 ? 4.i 0 ?

rs?‘o V ?‘5 ‘?’ 651) ‘E’

;‘5 ‘; 50

!‘Cl’!1!

()j)

‘(6 !S! ?’ ‘oj5

-L;- " ?’(t)?:u???3H.o??ou..a+"=? ==o. B s ,’ E “ai-s

0 % i.n a) ri -

E 7 G ‘A o a

(p a)w ‘-sr
€ " . ? j} a) w +-! a) - ;

?E q o ..C) :) !),l

€ ? E aa?‘a 0 (/l cE S3a) -: 7 0 a ’ i.-10-; 4 0 m sn, C?, 4ff

?"‘a ‘??;’ ?-? ?E ,o? ?E LL ? ,? ?ro ? ; i 0? “wH

q ,,co z . ‘0

2o cm ?= D5 ?omu ??

au” ; :f:

E S “E 9 0 ?C b ,u -’ 0 ‘- l/}

:)0 ?3 ?9 17 E o? ‘.p

2: xo ,.,za’‘a?Huai?; w? co € " m uF E E ‘5 E o 0

a> 7, (@)?

a E a o jFl C

-IJ (l a) ‘=” w 0

-5c aam .u-ia: :o- ‘:ha), mac m

(‘Cl a- a) (U

€ !’ N. 7 € at Q ro a

C-? 0. ()(‘0

45 C

a) ffi

s z

j)5

a kf’l j, ,0

ffl6

gBeA -l-’ ! )

ff -l-J -p

3 -(/l - ui 0

a) C y

fi3 * E ?

-’ (t) a) 0,,n " J) J: j?

‘- () L # u + a- :)

E,E

.H s .o q

:) . a’o rCl

, s z a s, =#* :’ : E

–

? 0 au ’l- E j: u’Cx-?

‘?

w ? l/l w

art

a)()

E :C ,-!, ?@

c :E) ! !,

?.oo E. W4 ?-ffi z,Eai ?@ % c5 (Cl 0

I.-

‘2> ffl o 3 m ‘a s ’ ui ?)u ,al 1 c

:?o Vc? :0mo r53:‘f z”’:” :o “’!??a; or r:. a) E ’ i.n 0

s .C a “?‘ao j?, (5 Q O ff u () ,;@z C’O S!: E E uo ?!h:! -n E § :; 5D 3 C ?

<j<F,‘o> E, ,=x ‘-=,- ?–u %?,? ‘, ?8 E ,,lx ?-o fia i.6+ o ‘?3, 0

? i0 -: a) 4’ (> .j Cs r a 0 :J ,,@) m

a aE ‘i- % ‘FO O e:<zroO

.X . ’ < 2 roc g ED

aE! T’j ‘O-

‘(5 ‘aCl z s: !

< A (0 rE

;: (? (1) Cl a ’li ’lw ? ?’ g

€a’ ? J O : ‘- a J: ct j) w (‘0 (‘0 0 y l

Lfl

(/)

Page 24 of 192

mn c

€Q

e’? ‘a-

vca o

r,ffi ?-tDO

jD3 (yffi,33 “s"2m e " fl ‘a’

0 o

(l)O m

art

i tu z m $11 m O)

‘CL ll-

3 .C

ca*

0i -:: (t$ art

-i-i,, ‘mO m

Cj) c

qv a-i o € -i-(; (. ‘€Q ‘€Q O €/)iC .p ff ch :,Ei aE5) ’l 9 s Z’ €/; O Z

O–

%-?l

? C E -!,:

0 0

0-. s

m’ao3m’t)3-

Claj

‘a p) -€ as

jD " m B

,’-” J:

§ ,9

(f. T) z :

a’ P .a2 -S?

CL-g ,‘5 :5

5ig:

(7) i.C?0’C-,,<)

5Q)

s, s

Ei $ ‘, @)

g) r l- '

‘k?7 k5

;cr>

ts ‘? ,(3 K ?

.4 i

SO -‘CS (0

-+m’?

(

JEa$

? ‘4’ a) Q2 9, ,= ,a) a

‘6 ‘N m ‘!

ffia) g0)

? (Sa i ;’
a) s i- ?
a:‘5?’-“t: C ; :

:’- ao)- ‘a5 ?

ffi .c- , ?

cffl q s ‘j-

‘4-(ff m-

@) C 3 ?

?m ‘o? @

l-.

J)5

s;e-

2 : @) ?

s?”” “? ?‘ao ?o

CLI

ffit

= -, -l- E E

Mq) r,

a’ o t- ’ S

m € a= ‘5j (n

z-m z, ,ae ;$xcQn

s-!’-

,-c s g)Cl J!?Stl ztn

O l!) € ‘+- O

l- ? IL? o 4w

J:i- ; CE

‘-C:(l)

e " b

t.-. E5’ a) 0

c 1 ,= 0 < ffi ,- og 9,

-!: - k:#O

-r5g

s s % ‘(D j ?q O6s

§, .7 bo

o” CO (D Q)? % %- ? l@ ‘) ? (%il " ’ C’a

‘o’- oo:% ?’

; s t,

,(15 tq5, ?ffi ffi. m(i e

@ %, 3

?? B? ?,M.’? o????”?

Qz C-a-? a?i CO €

c,O% <- :a5o- Q.m j

a)o-a)C

D’-tn;V

U)a)co?!? U) a) @) ??

aO € o’- CL ?"

aaCs-

0C/)

(2:?

iS E: §

:)a

m?ooipu i-, ?’€/.??’.,

,Z G,

’ ? n

IIIJ

GE s Eo,% O ,o s -f, q

(Di-z> 0O’ CQ ns dlt>

iCO E,, @) N, -,%? (J) 5’

?ip"

-0

a)? ,!)8

a)(6a)-5 ,, a) C

C%I - O 0) !m C:

u EEiEA,, z?A%

! m " .!’ 0 -a)-:

???‘a?@o 3 j?

mi –l

(01 6 0 ‘-’ 00,

w a’ n ,’ O 0

(Yl ‘- T- (

“’:ff E as,:,

Oi Ci

D>?a ‘? *?=

ffi(?a(

-l

B(1)l-3 ;’ aE

a)l 01

@".Oo.fl

gi a)l €l a)i

:sl il

o50 «-E: w

ni ml 01

m ? " ?o aoa-co$(?ai Ggi

:}i

C/)l

(.5(U(;

?@ E ?’:G ?n

v ? C EEffi

li m-;€ Cp

s ,C-!:: E a,E ,S’ ‘, C n

c U) a) C.U5

(1) D ,,

‘?

0 ,@) 2,

?,h? o ,N?

o? E

W? o ,a,i o

(l) C “: €/)

Q!-w H"CL

55 ,)mp0 ffi4

0 2? a> E E ,9 :!’ as

i - v -

-(a)J:

B @ € a)

., ‘o *w a’C} U) -i- ? o

€/) c

za:

50 I-l-l

(/) !

n J: -i-(.

-5

.0 ,; n c

?‘O

-h-l

(/)‘i CL

11-O lh-u O’a

:Cm

m 0

LLI S

0: 04

5@)

n :) U)

a, J: 0

0’ wg

-?U) 0,

LLH :(Z %LLl LLI

-l-l

-5

art art o

6’, C:(Q

i(Og

}<;6

m (Th == 8

5? o

J:l

co U g?>wE’@.

(p 0) oCCJ oCL

,,,2 ‘1 00

–:l

’t

.CL @ 53 @5 (35 ;,-’ § CD

‘E5 ejo

C:l

@ 9 ,” gn,

Iu-

tt>o .-!- C

@ (% o, $

a)l

01 a.-l

o’JOJEEa

.n ()

4wl-

-:m C: ? €/) tu z(J)

(1 ‘? ’lCL’

O,:,j .Q -: C:

Z LLI C/) z

a:l

;CL: sp e

a)CO

-m -

?5 C’ ?’ a)

?> 0)’ ffl,%?">

N <a!@

J’

JE a 0

MaEa R

SmC)( N

li a)l :?:

C/)l

-l

3 a)

..ol

W c

Eo a=c 92 @

O’ E :> !g ‘aCD ‘? E r (l) v,,@ .ffl

0 aw r> ri ri

5Gr,yHe C O a) p y’

,:e ““n” :sc ,m,’ :;oo

(1),’ ,00, (3 @ .

W) Go ’ 4”:

–(r

’ of. r- ' CQ

Q? E ?’m :,-? c

O C( CL

ni Ci

J: a)

I: U)

C-#

B, s ?> s

€gE “a)

€’

9? A

ffi

,.,:00 00’

00 C%lC%l

,p aB 5ao

U)l

/CL <.A0

t &.

ZCl

a)e

O n a o c

th C o :j:

“o C

(l: 35

o > f’ s E 55

4-l-W

!%-

LLI

e m

:? ,’,O(j)!::4El

art

mm :) CL

;j5 o (02

o€ m – g

art a

-5 .<) p

LLI 3.!Ll

O h a) €, ‘C)

m!:;

S S!:

u.i2 IK J:-!”

))5 :s? o !),,

u-0 ,0) ? %JI

€%

11% –

‘:} ‘2s n

a)i

€/)‘wt:

‘:J>b

(-i-

a).ff ‘UJ:

J)a3 ffih ia,i

0-C

-hJ

So z

eria§ ;s ?o

o U) O W

a,i p a* J:‘aa

+- (J) 3 ,:J:0 a)-”

O(D E'8E

a art o

(/)l a)l

CL<

5:E 0; ffin

:C 0

€/)y CC (:C

.CI CL

eU:J wU:J LLa)

c o ‘: m o

-5

QJ, *ii’

Page 25 of 192

-l-’

na)

Ef5>z

-g J:

M ‘@ ,0, ?o -5 €O mm E :$ -j,!: u> (l)

E- ‘ac Cr” O !GO-O a,iO O C: 0); m €O

CTh c a

a)?

art

a)(D

,gj:

art

9 ‘5

ffi

art

2E C:

y 3o -5

a)‘cg2

3n “C g0m

e 92 o ‘a) a)

E (y. :? art

‘C

s- 9 U)

y€‘f5€J) €P ?‘o§

(f.R n(l.i

or ,: ,”-

<DQ)(l) €/) J: .E

N ;fi U)

(30

.G? Jo

Bc ‘?: ?"=’

?B ?ffi o"a’

‘CD U

1-17 s? ?

4’?? CL:

(Q-h-

(" ,

.C 0 ()

g)(1) .22

i:2-g

<L)

tuB €/)

–:(Q

-3 ‘,,

a),’,

ma.

j:tn a) q>!J) ff €/)-l-l €/)4’

o -??

(3.g

‘-*-y

?(??O oo? N @,?J:

tJ S ‘,

,33s-4

a)oE

7% ffi ffl

45 6?) art <=i

ga),m ’m J:} E

,lk ,@) N

l(1)

g)0)LL

a)0a) g-;O J:‘O

? m z

fia)a); CC7)

qQ-C)) N -i C

‘ho p? As

?m ‘-*-i m art o

U) &- w €Q €/)

i :a:.-

00 0a) ffi5

o J: 0 0 o

-O U) sw w e U) ? , s*-

-la0 -C

@<;5

T:.5 m !!’ A 50’O ‘) o 3, .i 2 B

(

Q5c

CL,C5

n c m

o)?

I.-

0 c%l

art-if

oS a?C: G

OTh

‘-l’er

ai 6

JE5

-i- ,C: o,

s z

r3a -. E @ -:

;

E?$2 U) U)

s:,M’ f aog. m !

,a W= U),

m’

?a)

O as C:

art

€

(/)

€

-5

ffi

C/)

€@n-== m 5ffi art )!

ma)2

‘x? i.

+-i, ??‘o D’ 0 g) E ‘? trs ? ‘>U)’

J: ,o- (5.

014)(1 (p(0

? %i
(Q
n
’ U)
!‘0: q’ 0jC%.lm

‘0 () ()

z> O

!!? i-i-?(.C ’ li-

s-CO

?,“o E’ Aart?o, ?c? .5 ‘-(3) 5)? fi

n! ‘o o?’ oaZ

co’ u0 -m ,gfl ?(0, acffi -,;o’ ?= 7o o’

?ai -So ro .G FA:a NB,a>ffl ?a,i c:o EEI ‘,.,’,C=?o J:’ @ J:} aS !5 O () (l)

9 -i- Q
a)50%
P, Q 0 s,: Y !:! a)

2€i#u r? j"m ctTl” ‘a5o ?E

4 me -5!- 4 ffi

a) : a)

-H"g$Si: oz @ ? Q

a’)

:) m

C/)

art

ffi

’n c m

a:i

art n n as

C):

’d

art

art a)

C: J: o i

C/)

€

o c

-5

€/) €f) 0

c J: m

m,% o ,? 5;p 9

2 E O a

3 a) n) a)n .!:: a)

=m a??a)== -? J(??

n m

-?0

-W

a) >CL -:> 0 (l) E ! E

n m o m

:} O c

e J:

Cl (Q CL

art

Cl)a= w a=

ffl?5j ffl :9 s C H= -C

i:$m:}

iEE:2

(z(7(U (1)n (1):a9 ,S!. I- U) .

ffil.-

?2 ag ‘ffi

M > fi C > 0. aC} 4 a.

:ll- lao ?

o.oa$-Cffi

‘FLa ‘jj3 E’ “z J:

m d, !X) (1)<Q !!,! ‘, ,”

’ ac 0 :

l U) C

a) ? e0 3

-h, )g 0 ,,

s a,? 3, o

:; y’ J: ( co ? ?

C: o

Dr<6 o2?’.G

a’Cl)a)

c.=;i

(% Oo

J:? !(l) r-B

So o– 8 3 So -

€

0(B

13 C E C

n=a 9?% ‘:lj.5 S’ (:

‘@5gr%J s CIN

m n

r ‘?wmo" a’C} (. u

, 0 v -C!

@ (O ,a C

O) U) m

a .(p .@) c

:?, =m ,ai,? E? ?L

O a

‘ff

?H,j.p,I E, .N ?c =ffl ,Lo’B a,(5 %g2

m; m" a?=???’m(l)’ %’ a ‘?@

5!" 3N4B :’ ff ’ ::

AK ’m €/; “D ‘a’ .w – ? p c?i 2rs’co (B ?o s eo

C o m m as

s m

,9 a> 0 , -o? -p C)) >

Oza) ‘9 a)) 0) IJ ,; @)

!h(

oca I–

CLa: -“a5 j:% ?5

o e " ’m

‘fo 3,a’E

C, ;. g?, ,A,” G” ‘;?:?? ?;a?a?a

U),N “’ ?!’ l:ll?

32’

?5 .,o2eo.0?DCL

s*-+’ 5Q)() s-a)“5:§ ffi

.9 n, 3= !’-"(6 E So

0 -Q < ’ 0

R ?cai ?o “n’as oo? ?!

‘6-=‘E0

-m’ " ‘J}? rJ’J CF)?*a’a a cc5;4c ,: ? ea ,:

a!JOC: a ’ J:i C

c ? =i < EP at”: =a) m

to tuB

<)CL a+‘aCL

a)a) l” -i-m ! alOCL

5C 0-;:

U).

a) E5).SA E -y -i0).SA C-

‘,,?a) 2, CL @ 5? G ?( ;? ,Q) a'9"C’;enU)V %’ 3”

i’: !’! a)

C-C

EO) o p’

E!’

;§.ff5 g(3’o ffif

a)€/}C$)

n oc ,C

as aCl

f C r

2 -5 B

K 5- E

aa)g CL’ .G

ll- - -

a)m

0e)

J:0) +‘l"C

CLQ

m? lll?

-LO art

4’i?

‘ff

Q0?

5)5

‘o’ j’

7 o?

J,§ O€

C CL /% ,C,CL5 .

@)r

111.-r

f’l far - I-

9i ao .;)J)’ n oo i E y tp () ca s IIJ>OCU) ) Q c

o 0 aow (D -9 -‘C)aHaiv

%

q ?B 0- C$- a)

(:- O C/)

eog 00 a’c) ffi s !,mO %,m (C

o(‘j

0:a) 6 n €

c(D, c -9’ 2 €t$ m (B w

mi C ‘r

CC:

!)0 C-:

?, +J 1?*

-5

fmO J:

@) s ,? J: ‘- -lC-l,? <n OC!

jE a) m

C/)< OC

a5€Q W<6 -i-a) U) m0j ,,;Ci a) -i- -:U) ; U)

§. (3)!Q s 2 :! 6C

E:C

q)CL,

!g I-j- E

.E E t?Q. -( -l-l(l o C -

-h-= m?

-l-l

‘a)’ $’ :Ea

o 4 050 w j) ‘4 C

5 aai as -!-, C

S e Lu’ S

? -g a a) C a7i

c>5H

o) C i.-

f G:2

Cw ffi@) (li C

! O C

? CL*‘aa ?4w

@ % C;

CL5!’ U) J:C

3., 5r,,.

pg) ) a)0 J:’

(l)-iJ:a’@

zz (1) !! s

(.h s a?,

? (D I- iss ss

n-!

J:’ -i- @) 0

a) as as s- th a)m(t$i:;

nl6w

s*-?

J: .: n :W ‘-

‘4w ? n% ts ‘ffi ), @ 9 s,

-5 –L

‘c ?

O n* “a)

?(Tham% (l)?5 0e@ a ‘o0 P

–I . . -i- a)

“..’l E. 5o 8

? (11 ? ? !!?’ l Fo a?‘a) a)’

?‘7 E ?@ €J)o

Cl ns rs

!)l ‘A ! :i ,“l -I a) s a)i (- L. ej ,# =ni,

“U)

ffiJ,

O0 OCL C=

@)h

-B <;5 ,a; @) Q -hJ j

% ’ 4

5,0,a+-co e c JC’ ;)D a)o) 0 .CI-B ‘(? 2 jo g

:$gU)

ixb I-

a) N * n :U

2H n C a) Ha) maso art

B 3 CL

§ a

-n a)ff (U(.

%ll ?

5.g2 a” a> (6i O 5€fJ n c

-a) X m

5<6

E: is

??K CL ), s a; e ,(1) (1) E € e: ;’, 0 n?J:5G0 n ’ J: ? 0 (. -b- C a- -i0) 0 a= -i- a) a) O

ff” 3 5?’ aaa a= 9 j’ s ?. a(5. ( .?lll +J m ?

as m Cj), E fi% O .E o E m

mU)

U) art

JB O E z

s. m.t5 ?aEE= mo-wumo art

, E$ ; (1)

0 () O ‘. Q E. C ‘; ‘?O -0

? @53 ?000 n= ? a:

ll- ’ 0

art

n n

? € a

co’<-r-

a)I-.. a)., m cm au

10’o a)

Q -:= a) a)2 0-

‘cEo’ ?a:?o"5 -‘k,‘S.S!! !;ic” ?’e= ?m?:

S ? (a @) J. :5? ‘??

’ C

a.o’a= .Eg 2 C”

art J: ffi

o !

(17@)

n,-

6>;ffi Oe %(l)

io-

.ffl ‘Fz?g ?ffl e. ? Q q) f ?

?? (Q

ffiffi

CiU) m-"’

€ :. q E @ 0,a)

Sa) -C

! 3" SO n

?51 !o? =? Ja:e'5 –l

a5? Th :$l

m ff

<)o'0,r’ aC-E ?tt> mffl ? m

n
c
m: U) O 2!’ ,o p U) aO

X m

-g

art

m ! U)

art

Cj)

art

..C

art

ffi

<;5 C)0: 0 -

Page 26 of 192

o S

c% +E; a?t.> 9 oCL CQE O ,, art

s-m

,g € J:’: ,5?,

%9 U) a)(l)

rcl-

‘a)

,U)

0 i

naO

,Q E

E5 E E

OC/)

art

y’

af0i

i(D

E ,-. -Th S

ffi

g)a)

@%l

5j:

tp lhart 0 :t=: ?aC

O LL

o-O

(13? ‘T)

5.o ffi-,fi

: W

’e) Mp

I-

[11

O ?J:

a) ,, art J:’ ,. -l’

? ?l’llh (l)), !=.a

:}5 fl5 m(l)a) @)a) w:)

b’ll ‘Cl

h-i

e"’

?tl+’

gc(3 .Ea)€

Z-LL( e

ffl (0! !ffi ( C@

O!)O

[55;? €0’a0

n a) W v O a) g -J:

e (r

0:E

a ‘-

95 LE

a.’->..41

5E oO

U), ;5 s-; -W a.-F &;L–

P imi !

.o €6

3C 5ffl hJ

?ur ?€’t’ aTh J’,

O ffl c e ma Cg5

Page 27 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ 15ÿÿ0ÿ 8 4182ÿ8321ÿ 56ÿ ÿ

Page 28 of 192

ÿ 055412ÿÿÿ ÿ 56524ÿ0 8ÿ82ÿ! 2"5# ÿ ÿ582 "ÿ$83ÿ085ÿ% 2ÿ5&1ÿ'8ÿ8546ÿ 82ÿ(554ÿ866ÿ(345 2"ÿ ÿ (499ÿ) 25ÿÿ159ÿ%“1216441&5ÿ9915ÿ 15ÿ$8"“6ÿ$1548ÿ89ÿ$5&58+524ÿ (5&156ÿÿÿÿÿ%25 ÿ0 ““8,6ÿÿ 5,-ÿ$ &1"ÿ.81” ÿ521 ÿ(3+5&168-ÿ ÿ -ÿ 055412ÿ#14ÿ(83452ÿ/82452 ÿ83214ÿ(5&156ÿ 0ÿ $ &1"ÿ8#2652"ÿ5&15#5"ÿ45ÿ+86ÿ89955"ÿÿ(83452ÿ/82452 ÿ 83214ÿ(5&156-ÿ82526ÿ834ÿ681ÿ168 4182ÿ83214ÿ525914ÿ

52566ÿ2"ÿ8321 4182ÿ# 6ÿ"163665”-ÿ.8#ÿ"8ÿ561"5246ÿ,28#ÿ455ÿ16ÿ

5+ÿ2"ÿ65&156ÿ&151ÿÿ5ÿ"5615ÿ16ÿ98ÿ(834ÿ/82452 ÿ65218ÿ 561"5246ÿ48ÿ5 12ÿ12ÿ451ÿ856ÿ2"ÿ48ÿ8995ÿ+86ÿ2"ÿ65&156ÿ6ÿ 998” 5ÿ6ÿ+86615-ÿ*++843214156ÿ98ÿ8 84182ÿ#55ÿ"163665"ÿ2"ÿ#1ÿ 5ÿ988#5"ÿ3+ÿ4ÿÿ6499ÿ5&5-ÿ(/ ( ÿ16ÿ284ÿ655,12ÿ"“14182 ÿ932"12-ÿÿ ÿ ÿ -ÿ ÿ48ÿ*"5ÿ2ÿ53 ÿ055412ÿ2ÿ3ÿ+ÿ -ÿ $5 4182ÿ89ÿ+5321ÿ1245564ÿ2"ÿ45ÿ525 ÿ2 435ÿ45589ÿ 0ÿ 83218ÿ582 "ÿ"5 5"ÿÿ+5321ÿ1245564ÿ#14ÿ56+54ÿ48ÿ%52” ÿ445ÿ ÿ0ÿ45ÿ% 83246ÿ 5ÿ2"ÿ 8ÿ16412-ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 5-ÿ %++8& ÿ89ÿ%52” ÿ 0ÿ ÿ56834182ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ'8-ÿ22ÿ 08&5"ÿÿ83218ÿ085ÿÿÿ (582"5"ÿÿ$5+34ÿ0 8ÿ(554ÿ 4ÿ45ÿ52" ÿ5ÿ"8+45"ÿ6ÿ+565245"-ÿÿ 15"ÿ ÿ -ÿ ( 5"35"ÿ 865"ÿ(566182ÿ2ÿ26ÿ 7-ÿ $55 41826ÿ2ÿ26ÿ 3-ÿ 31ÿ055412ÿ 0ÿ ÿ56834182ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ'8-ÿ22ÿ 08&5"ÿÿ$5+34ÿ0 8ÿ(554ÿÿÿ (582"5"ÿÿ83218ÿ085ÿ 4ÿÿ+31ÿ55412ÿ5ÿ5"ÿ48ÿ"16366ÿ+ 2212ÿ 4456ÿ5 45"ÿ48ÿ 8ÿ926ÿ2ÿ82 566182ÿÿ 4ÿ84ÿÿ83883ÿ$16414ÿ 8ÿ9265ÿ2ÿ82 566182ÿÿ 4ÿ84ÿ7ÿ:5"98"ÿ$16414ÿ 15"ÿ ÿ 0ÿ 5;8212ÿ89ÿ82566182ÿÿ 4ÿ84ÿÿ83883ÿÿ$16414ÿ2ÿ3ÿ:324ÿ 8124ÿ 25ÿ ÿ

Page 29 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ 15ÿ86ÿ5 125ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ6354ÿ854ÿ5515ÿ816182 ÿ826524ÿ 8 ÿ98ÿ45ÿ5 4182ÿ89ÿ825ÿ25ÿ5615241ÿ1145ÿ65156ÿ 459824ÿ84ÿ 98ÿ2ÿ516412ÿ854ÿ4ÿ 4ÿ!84ÿ"ÿ82566182ÿ#ÿ16414ÿ89ÿ !83883ÿ3211 ÿ$282ÿ6ÿ%ÿ&324ÿ8124ÿ! 25’ÿÿ(5ÿ6555ÿ 26ÿ1ÿ826164ÿ89ÿ81 45ÿÿ 56ÿ14ÿÿ5456ÿ89ÿ98245ÿ 82ÿ &324ÿ8124ÿ! 25ÿ98ÿ45ÿ516412ÿÿ 5ÿ84ÿ2ÿ)ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ98245ÿ 82ÿ &3$ÿ! $5’ÿÿ(5ÿ54125ÿ26ÿ826164ÿ89ÿ81 45ÿ%ÿ 56ÿ12ÿ5 ÿ14ÿ 81 45ÿ%ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ98245ÿ82ÿ&3$ÿ! $5ÿ2ÿ&324ÿ8124ÿ! 25ÿ 4512 412ÿ4ÿ45ÿ6354ÿ854’ÿ(5ÿ54125ÿ2ÿ1ÿ5ÿ153 ÿ6 5ÿ 35ÿ48ÿ45ÿ829134182ÿ89ÿ45ÿ685125ÿ2ÿ45ÿ2 43 ÿ488ÿ89ÿ45ÿ84’ÿÿ +ÿ25ÿ52425ÿ2ÿ15 ÿ1ÿ5ÿ8264345ÿ98ÿ&324ÿ8124ÿ! 25ÿ48ÿ 815ÿ 566ÿ98ÿ45ÿ6555ÿ84’ÿÿ(5ÿ516412ÿ84ÿ 6ÿ98245ÿ82ÿ&324ÿ8124ÿ ! 25ÿ14ÿ 45ÿ98245ÿ 82ÿ&3$ÿ! $5ÿ,-834ÿ& 612.ÿ2ÿ16ÿ5 1ÿ 55445ÿ14ÿ685ÿ5 5ÿ416ÿ82ÿ45ÿ854’ÿ(5ÿ-834ÿ& 612ÿ89ÿ&3$ÿ ! $5ÿ16ÿ2ÿ4/ 14ÿ$5ÿ4834ÿ$50ÿ64145ÿ558524ÿ82486ÿ5ÿ12ÿ 5ÿ 98ÿ45ÿ5 4182ÿ89ÿ25ÿ846ÿ1412ÿ#ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ4/ 14ÿ$56’ÿ+2ÿ 12182524 ÿ2 4ÿ+66566524ÿ5 5ÿÿ32418ÿ! $5ÿ+665665246ÿ 12182524 ÿ8263412ÿ12ÿ+3364ÿ)ÿ 6ÿ631445ÿ12ÿ6384ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 826524ÿ1 4182’ÿÿ(5ÿ12+ÿ58264456ÿ45ÿ6414ÿ2ÿ845415ÿ82141826ÿ 45678459ÿ;<ÿ=>?@@ÿAB4ÿCD5ÿE5FÿGBCÿBEÿHÿIHCÿJHKHJ8C<LÿGHM5ÿCDHCÿJHEÿ;5ÿ 155ÿ483ÿ45ÿ5N8212ÿ89ÿ45ÿ6555ÿ854ÿ12ÿ85ÿ48ÿ52635ÿ4 4ÿ 455ÿ1ÿ5ÿ28ÿ1 4ÿ48ÿ45ÿ 45ÿO3 14ÿ89ÿ&3$ÿ! $5ÿ28ÿ48ÿ45ÿ 144ÿ98ÿ $5ÿ4834ÿ6ÿÿ5634’ÿ(5ÿ52156ÿ ÿ28ÿ8541826ÿ48ÿ45ÿ6552 5ÿ4ÿ45ÿ 415ÿ89ÿ816182 ÿ826524ÿ6354ÿ48ÿ451ÿ82141826ÿ512ÿ54’ÿÿP8ÿ14182 ÿ 85246ÿ55ÿ5515ÿ12ÿ515ÿ89ÿ45ÿ5N8212ÿ1 4182’ÿÿ ÿÿ (55ÿ55ÿ28ÿ85246ÿ98ÿ8321ÿ8ÿ45ÿ31’ÿÿ ÿ ÿ .ÿ Q5N8212ÿ89ÿ82566182ÿ#ÿ 4ÿ!84ÿRÿ&598ÿ16414ÿ/ÿ%ÿ-582ÿS5 52ÿ ! 25ÿ ÿ 15ÿ86ÿ5 125ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ6354ÿ854ÿ5515ÿ816182 ÿ826524ÿ 8 ÿ98ÿÿ84ÿ14182ÿ98ÿ2ÿ516412ÿ854ÿ4ÿ 4ÿ!84ÿRÿ82566182ÿ #ÿ16414ÿ89ÿ&598ÿ3211 ÿ$282ÿ6ÿ-582ÿS5 52ÿ! 25’ÿ(5ÿ6555ÿ 26ÿ1ÿ826164ÿ89ÿ81 45ÿ’%ÿ 56ÿ89ÿ2ÿ14ÿ81 45ÿÿ 5456ÿ89ÿ98245ÿ 82ÿ(14ÿ26 2ÿ! $5ÿ2ÿ1ÿ5ÿ55ÿ14ÿ26ÿ 5665ÿ6ÿ%ÿ-582ÿS5 52ÿ! 25’ÿÿ(5ÿ54125ÿRÿ 5ÿ84ÿ 6ÿ#Rÿ 5456ÿ89ÿ98245ÿ 82ÿ-582ÿS5 52ÿ! 25ÿ2ÿ 6ÿ45ÿ5O315ÿÿ5456ÿ 89ÿ98245ÿ82ÿ(14ÿ26 2ÿ! $5’ÿÿP8ÿ558524ÿ16ÿ8865ÿ98ÿ45ÿ 54125ÿ26ÿ483ÿ455ÿ16ÿ639911524ÿ5 ÿ48ÿ558ÿ45ÿ84ÿ12ÿ45ÿ93435’ÿÿÿ ÿÿ (5ÿ6354ÿ854ÿ16ÿN825ÿQ3 ÿ,QT.ÿ12ÿ45ÿ(8261ÿ89ÿ-834ÿU82452 ÿ V8212ÿ& ’ÿ(5ÿ124524ÿ89ÿ45ÿQ3 ÿN825ÿ16ÿ48ÿ514ÿÿ154ÿ89ÿ3656ÿ4 4ÿ 5ÿ8 415ÿ14ÿ45ÿ3 ÿ26 5ÿ12 312ÿ5615241ÿ2ÿ1343 ÿ 3656ÿ2ÿ4865ÿ21 ’ÿ(5ÿ525914412ÿ26ÿ5ÿN825ÿ!1145ÿ-515ÿ Q5615241ÿW 459824ÿ154182ÿR"ÿ,Q!-W/R".ÿV825ÿ12ÿ45ÿ1552412ÿ ’ÿ(5ÿ6145ÿ65191ÿN8212ÿ5O3156ÿÿÿ545ÿ654 $ÿ98ÿ45ÿ1 45ÿ $ÿ8ÿ988125ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 458ÿ,(14ÿ26 2ÿ! $5.‘ÿ 2212ÿ6499ÿ ÿ 58525ÿ4 4ÿÿ8214182ÿ89ÿ816182 ÿ826524ÿ12ÿ1 4182ÿ-/%/)&ÿ 5ÿ12 35ÿ48ÿ52635ÿ45ÿ5O315524ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ2ÿ48ÿ5ÿ8255ÿ5ÿ5N825ÿ 48ÿ5821N5ÿ45ÿ52 25ÿ654 $ÿ82ÿ45ÿ525914412ÿ26’ÿÿ(5ÿ5N8212ÿ 56656ÿ416ÿ5O315524’ÿÿ(5ÿ54125ÿ26ÿ1ÿ8241235ÿ48ÿ555ÿ45ÿ 1213ÿ5O315524ÿ98ÿ8 ÿ98245ÿ 4598245ÿ2ÿ5 ‘ÿÿ(5ÿ 8865ÿ525914412ÿ26ÿ1ÿ125 65ÿÿ45ÿ61N5ÿ89ÿ45ÿ854ÿ4ÿ%ÿ-582ÿ S5 52ÿ! 25ÿ98ÿ’“ÿ 56ÿ48ÿ”‘ÿ 56ÿ1ÿ1ÿ125 65ÿ45ÿ61N5ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 459824ÿ84ÿ2ÿ1ÿ815ÿ125 65ÿ399512ÿ98ÿ45ÿ52 5ÿ 5’ÿ X31245ÿ82654182ÿ6445ÿ12ÿ451ÿP855ÿ)ÿ)ÿ85246ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ 8256ÿ1ÿ255ÿ48ÿÿ98ÿÿ514ÿ18ÿ48ÿ2ÿ558524ÿ ,826434182Y9112Y5 4182Y6145ÿ12.ÿ1412ÿ#ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ45ÿZÿ5 ÿ 988ÿ 12ÿ89ÿ(14ÿ26 2ÿ! $5ÿ2ÿ1412ÿ#ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ45ÿ1ÿ 45ÿ 4134ÿ2ÿ1412ÿ#ÿ5456ÿ89ÿ2ÿ542ÿ832 ÿ,155ÿ16ÿ5 45.‘ÿÿ P8ÿ14182 ÿ85246ÿ55ÿ5515ÿ12ÿ515ÿ89ÿ45ÿ5N8212ÿ1 4182’ÿ

[]^ÿ̀ÿabÿc

Page 30 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ ÿÿ 55ÿ55ÿ28ÿ85246ÿ98ÿ8321ÿ8ÿ45ÿ31ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 5 6834182ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ ÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ085"ÿ 4ÿ2ÿ8843214"ÿ !12%ÿ552ÿ8!15ÿ45ÿ31ÿ55412%ÿ5ÿ865ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ &ÿ ‘8! ÿ89ÿ0123456ÿ ÿ 0ÿ ÿ(ÿÿ8321ÿ055412%ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ(ÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ085"ÿÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿ 4ÿ45ÿ123456ÿ89ÿ45ÿ0 ÿ(ÿÿ8321ÿ55412%ÿ5ÿ8!5ÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ 0ÿ ÿÿÿ814455ÿ89ÿ45ÿ)85ÿ055412%ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ*ÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ085"ÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿ 4ÿ45ÿ123456ÿ89ÿ45ÿ0 ÿÿÿ814455ÿ89ÿ45ÿ)85ÿ55412%ÿ5ÿ 8!5ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ +3612566ÿ’1612%ÿ98ÿ45ÿ0123456ÿ ÿ &ÿ'223 ÿ584ÿ82ÿ#12,12%ÿ) 45ÿ-3 14"ÿÿ$“52 ÿ) 45ÿ5 4524ÿ . 24ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ/ÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ5!1ÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿ 4ÿ8321ÿ551!56ÿ45ÿ&ÿ'223 ÿ812 5ÿ584ÿ98ÿ45ÿ$“52 ÿ ) 45ÿ5 4524ÿ. 24ÿ6ÿ50315ÿ"ÿ45ÿ456ÿ2ÿ82141826ÿ834125ÿ12ÿ $ 535ÿÿ89ÿ45ÿ12418ÿ5%3 4182ÿ/23ÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ $” 52 ÿ) 45ÿ. 24ÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ&ÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ5!1ÿÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿ 4’ÿ8321ÿ 54ÿ45ÿ584ÿ45ÿ82ÿ45ÿ$“52 ÿ) 45ÿ. 24ÿ 45ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ2ÿ4 4ÿ416ÿ 445ÿ551!5ÿ28ÿ9345ÿ 4182ÿ"ÿ8321ÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ $3 84ÿ98ÿ8261ÿ89ÿ$834ÿ$48824ÿ56834182ÿ5% 12%ÿ10.5ÿ53212%ÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿÿ 08!5ÿ"ÿ#534"ÿ0 “8ÿ$554ÿÿÿ $5825ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ5!1ÿ 4ÿ8321ÿ63846ÿ45ÿ503564ÿ48ÿ52865ÿ45ÿ56834182ÿ 665ÿ"ÿ45ÿ 8261ÿ89ÿ$834ÿ$48824ÿ4ÿ451ÿ553 "ÿÿÿ8321ÿ55412%ÿ

6789ÿ;ÿ<=ÿ>

Page 31 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ 5 12ÿ45ÿ8121ÿ852524ÿ515ÿ89ÿ0ÿ3212ÿ4 4ÿ8156ÿ 223 ÿ93212ÿ 845246ÿ48ÿ3211 ÿ8525246ÿ48ÿ5ÿ899654ÿ85412ÿ2ÿ 14ÿ8646ÿ2ÿ165ÿ45ÿ515ÿ01216456ÿ89ÿ12 25ÿ03211 ÿ9916ÿ2ÿ 83612ÿ2ÿ83ÿ8 ÿ0ÿ89ÿ83ÿ82526!ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ "ÿ #8415ÿ89ÿ084182ÿ$ÿ%55 4182ÿ814455ÿ%5$81245246ÿ ÿ &5 5ÿ’($ ÿ$)ÿ ÿ ÿ 5"ÿ #8415ÿ89ÿ084182ÿ$ÿ824 4ÿ* 23 5ÿ ÿ +16ÿ1ÿ,5ÿ5955ÿ48ÿ3,1ÿ&5156ÿ814455ÿ98ÿ515ÿ2ÿ 826154182!ÿÿ ÿ ÿ %56834182ÿ#8!ÿ$$ÿ 085ÿ,(ÿ83218ÿ%51ÿÿÿ &5825ÿ,(ÿ-534(ÿ0 (8ÿ&554ÿ .55 6ÿ6482ÿ824 46ÿ14ÿ5 ÿ4151256ÿ52 4156ÿ2ÿ82141826ÿ5ÿ45ÿ 9832 4182ÿ89ÿ88ÿ,3612566ÿ5 41826ÿ +55985ÿ,5ÿ14ÿ5685ÿ4 4ÿ3,1ÿ&515ÿ6499ÿ5 3 45ÿ45ÿ824524ÿ 82141826ÿ2ÿ23 5ÿ89ÿ /8ÿ129643435ÿ8/546ÿ2ÿ 05ÿ 5852 41826ÿ2ÿ5846ÿ4 4ÿ1ÿ655ÿ48ÿ185ÿ514,114(ÿ89ÿ864ÿ2ÿ 82141826ÿ98ÿ45ÿ+8261!ÿ 15ÿ ÿ !ÿ %5846ÿ%513112ÿ 4182ÿ “ÿ +15ÿ’($ ÿ234526182ÿ ÿ 5ÿ’($ ÿ$4ÿ68!ÿÿ &5 ÿ ÿ %56834182ÿ#8!ÿ$$ÿ 085ÿ,(ÿ-534(ÿ0 (8ÿ&554ÿ &5825ÿ,(ÿ83218ÿ%51ÿ + 4ÿ8321ÿ52ÿ’( ÿ5$6ÿ6ÿ525ÿ48ÿ125 65ÿ45ÿ415ÿ15265ÿ 955ÿ98ÿ76ÿ5ÿ824ÿ48ÿ768ÿ5ÿ824ÿ5995415ÿ9 23 (ÿÿ:ÿ + 4ÿ8321ÿ9345ÿ53452ÿ45ÿ812 5ÿ 45ÿ98ÿ81,14182ÿ89ÿ45ÿ365ÿ89ÿ 15265ÿ4156ÿ82ÿ145ÿ5615241ÿ854(ÿ48ÿ-55,5ÿ6ÿ6:ÿ + 4ÿ85ÿ45ÿ518ÿ89ÿ45ÿ534526182ÿ’( ÿ65156ÿ12654ÿ5 ÿ854(ÿ48ÿ 52635ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ415ÿ3524(ÿ82ÿ6145ÿ 456ÿ45ÿ825ÿ15265ÿ4ÿ45ÿ415ÿ45ÿ ,( ÿ 6ÿ564,165:ÿ + 4ÿ’( ÿ65156ÿ8241235ÿ48ÿ52985ÿ45ÿ58 ÿ89ÿ3215265ÿ4156ÿ 683ÿ8 1246ÿ,5ÿ915ÿ,834ÿ25ÿ4156ÿ8ÿ19ÿ45(ÿ5ÿ16855ÿ312ÿ ;<=>?ÿABCDEFBGHÿEIHJBFKELIMÿ 2ÿ4 4ÿ416ÿ1298 4182ÿ,5ÿ8321 45ÿ48ÿ ÿ3524ÿ415ÿ15265ÿ856!ÿ 15ÿ ÿ ,“ÿ 83214(ÿ24ÿ8ÿ ÿ + 5ÿ5 125ÿ98ÿ1 41826ÿ16ÿ534525ÿ48ÿ1ÿ8ÿ!ÿÿ ÿ ÿ %56834182ÿ#8!ÿ$$ÿ 085ÿ,(ÿ83218ÿ&345 2ÿÿ &5825ÿ,(ÿ83218ÿ%8,546ÿ + 4ÿ8321ÿ52865ÿ45ÿ83214(ÿ246ÿ81(ÿ 45ÿ0 ÿÿ!ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ “ÿ 0Nÿ8812 48ÿ ÿ

OPQRÿTÿUVÿW

Page 32 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ 5 5ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 814455ÿ055412ÿ0123456ÿ ÿ ÿ 8614ÿ5 34191 4182ÿ814455ÿ55412ÿ5 ÿ!5"3 ÿ#ÿÿ ÿ “ÿ ÿ8$845ÿ5%156ÿ814455ÿ55412ÿ5 ÿ!5"3 ÿÿÿ ÿ &56834182ÿ'8ÿ#ÿ 08%5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ(582 ÿÿ 582 5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ345 2 ÿ ) 4ÿ8321ÿ551%56ÿ98ÿ1298 4182ÿ45ÿ123456ÿ89ÿ45ÿ98812ÿ814455ÿ 554126ÿ +ÿ 8614ÿ5 34191 4182ÿ814455ÿ55412ÿ5 ÿ!5"3 ÿ#ÿÿ +ÿ 8$845ÿ5%156ÿÿ814455ÿ55412ÿ5 ÿ!5"3 ÿÿÿÿ 15 ÿ ÿ ÿ 6ÿ ÿ ÿ,ÿÿ) -ÿ(5%ÿÿ ÿ ÿ &56834182ÿ'8ÿ.ÿ 08%5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ345 2 ÿ 582 5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ&8"546ÿ ) 4ÿ45ÿ98812ÿ" 6ÿ"5ÿ1%52ÿ9164ÿ2 ÿ6582 ÿ5 12ÿ +ÿ ÿ,ÿ +ÿ ÿ/ÿ +ÿ ÿÿ +ÿ ÿ0ÿ 15 ÿ ÿ &56834182ÿ'8ÿ,ÿ 08%5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ345 2 ÿ 582 5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ(582 ÿ ) 4ÿ ÿ,ÿ"512ÿÿ" ÿ48ÿ5%ÿ4-56ÿ12ÿ45ÿ)8261$ÿ89ÿ834ÿ !82452 ÿ98ÿ45ÿ5 ÿÿ"5ÿ1%52ÿ41ÿ5 12ÿ6125 ÿ2 ÿ65 5 ÿÿ 15 ÿ ÿ “ÿ ÿ/ÿÿ&55 4182ÿ814455ÿÿ)5$8ÿ1$$81245246ÿ ÿ ÿ &56834182ÿ'8ÿ/ÿ 08%5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ&8"546ÿÿÿ 582 5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ345 2 ÿ ) 4ÿÿ ÿ/ÿ"512ÿÿ" ÿ48ÿ$$8124ÿ8321ÿ5"56ÿ2 ÿ2 ÿ 5"56ÿ89ÿ45ÿ$3"1ÿ48ÿ216414ÿ&55 4182ÿ8144556ÿ2 ÿ834ÿ!82452 ÿ &55 4182ÿ814455ÿ"5ÿ1%52ÿ41ÿ5 12ÿ6125 ÿ2 ÿ65 5 ÿÿ 15 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ1$$8124ÿÿ0!3441ÿ8812 48ÿ ÿ ÿ &56834182ÿ'8ÿÿ 08%5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ345 2 ÿ 582 5 ÿ"ÿ83218ÿ(582 ÿ ) 4ÿ ÿÿ"512ÿÿ" ÿ48ÿ55 45ÿ34814ÿ98ÿ45ÿ$3$8656ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 03211$ ÿ!55 8ÿ89ÿ3298 4182ÿ2 ÿ4845 4182ÿ89ÿ41% ÿ1 4ÿ"5ÿ1%52ÿ41ÿ 5 12ÿ6125 ÿ2 ÿ65 5 ÿ 15 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ0ÿÿ)15ÿ(15265ÿ!55ÿ

5678ÿ:ÿ;<ÿ=

Page 33 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ582 ÿ 4ÿ! “ÿÿ512#ÿÿ “ÿ48ÿ$52ÿ! “ÿ%&ÿ54182ÿ’()ÿ 15265ÿ9556ÿ98ÿ4156ÿ5ÿ#152ÿ41ÿ5 12#ÿ61#25ÿ2ÿ65 5ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ &ÿ 5846ÿ98ÿ+298$ 4182ÿ )ÿ ,ÿ 83246ÿ- 5ÿ2ÿ- 8ÿ16412#ÿ ÿ )ÿ ÿ525ÿ-.%ÿ/ 9ÿ82ÿ014525ÿ ÿ%ÿ2ÿ%ÿ33ÿ ÿ )ÿ ÿ525ÿ-.ÿ034145 ÿ- 5$524ÿ0 312#ÿ ÿ )ÿ ,2 23 ÿ5 $524ÿ1$14ÿ82#ÿ5$ÿ554ÿÿ612 21ÿ71# 41826ÿ ÿ ÿ 63212#ÿ 5)ÿ 70-6ÿ ÿ ÿ %ÿ +298$ 4182ÿ+45$6ÿ )ÿ ÿ159ÿ,$12164415ÿ79915ÿÿ88ÿ-86412#ÿ2ÿ55614182ÿÿ ÿ )ÿ 08 245ÿ0 3#482ÿ0121645ÿ89ÿ+29643435ÿ59ÿ++-ÿ63212#ÿ ÿ ÿ ’ÿ 8415ÿ89ÿ0841826ÿ )ÿ 83218ÿ8546ÿ655ÿÿ28415ÿ89ÿ$84182ÿ4 4ÿ8321ÿ**8124ÿ4"8ÿ$5$56ÿ 48ÿ45ÿ83452ÿ682452 ÿ8$$3214ÿ5156ÿ!8 ÿ ÿ ÿ :ÿ ,228325$5246;445$5246ÿÿ832186ÿ )ÿ 5534ÿ0 8ÿ554ÿ4 235ÿ-31ÿ5156ÿ6499ÿ98ÿ45ÿ514ÿ"83ÿ45ÿ4883ÿ 82ÿ48ÿ566ÿÿ98812#ÿ12ÿ1836ÿ5 6ÿ35ÿ48ÿ"5 45ÿ 2#56ÿ64ÿ61 ÿ 2ÿ1248ÿ45ÿ"55352ÿÿ ÿÿ 0 8ÿ< 25” ÿ4 235ÿ6499ÿ6ÿ"5ÿ2ÿ2845ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ5 ÿ"14ÿ199134ÿ 6143 41826ÿ2ÿ936445ÿ5615246ÿ ÿÿ 83218ÿ582 ÿ2845ÿ45ÿ#5 4ÿ"83ÿ825ÿÿ-31ÿ5156ÿ2ÿ45ÿ=313ÿ 5 68265ÿ48ÿ98812#ÿ82526ÿ483#834ÿ45ÿ48"261ÿÿ ÿ ÿ >ÿ ?3564182ÿ89ÿ 14ÿ(98$ÿ45ÿ31ÿ82ÿ8348$5ÿ89ÿ#52 ÿ145$6)ÿ )ÿ 1#ÿ! 3ÿ635ÿ98ÿ 191 4182ÿ82ÿ45ÿ@28415ÿ89ÿ$84182@ÿ915ÿÿ83218ÿ 8546ÿ98ÿ5565244182ÿ82ÿ45ÿ6 ÿ!8 ÿÿ ÿÿ 0 8ÿ< 25” ÿ2845ÿ4 4ÿ45ÿ6 ÿ 6ÿ635ÿ45ÿ8"261ÿ98ÿ6616425ÿ 12ÿ15241912#ÿ2556ÿ2ÿ#54412#ÿ45ÿ$566#5ÿ834ÿ834ÿ451ÿ65156ÿ2ÿ45ÿ 28415ÿ89ÿ$84182ÿ” 6ÿ12ÿ568265ÿ48ÿ416ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 865ÿ566182ÿ )ÿ ,6ÿ5ÿ54182ÿ&ÿ89ÿ45ÿ03211 ÿ, 4ÿ ()ÿÿ,ÿ$55412#ÿ8ÿ* 4ÿ89ÿÿ$55412#ÿ$ ÿ5ÿ865ÿ48ÿ45ÿ31ÿ19ÿ45ÿ63A54ÿ $ 445ÿ512#ÿ826155ÿ16ÿ ()ÿ8865ÿ8ÿ5212#ÿ =31614182ÿ8ÿ168614182ÿ89ÿ2ÿÿ45ÿ$3211 14ÿ 8ÿ8 ÿ8 Bÿÿ ÿ2ÿ48ÿ**85ÿ$123456ÿ89ÿ*51836ÿ865ÿ65661826ÿ

CDEFÿHÿIJÿK

Page 34 of 192

0123456ÿ89ÿ8321ÿ 0 ÿÿÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ345 2ÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿ 4ÿ8321ÿ85ÿ1248ÿ 865ÿ566182ÿ6ÿ51445ÿÿ54182ÿ!ÿ”#ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 03211 ÿ$ 4ÿ48ÿ16366ÿÿ8 865ÿ8ÿ5212%ÿ &31614182ÿ8ÿ168614182ÿ89ÿ2ÿ ÿ45ÿ3211 14ÿ98ÿ45ÿ38656ÿ89ÿ8 ÿ'15212%ÿ2ÿ48ÿ 85ÿ123456ÿ89ÿ 51836ÿ865ÿ6566182ÿ55412%6ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ #ÿ 0123456ÿ89ÿ(555ÿÿ)ÿ 865ÿ566182ÿÿ814455ÿ89ÿ45ÿ85ÿ 0123456ÿ89ÿ+23 ÿ,ÿÿ 865ÿ566182ÿÿ814455ÿ89ÿ45ÿ85ÿ 01 23456ÿ89ÿ-53 ÿÿÿ 865ÿ566182ÿÿ8321ÿ ÿ ÿ #ÿ . 8 54ÿ$ &31614182ÿÿ8 ÿ*15212%ÿ ÿ ÿ #ÿ 5 6834182ÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ/582 ÿÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿ 4ÿ8321ÿ85ÿ834ÿ89ÿ865ÿ6566182ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ 8291 48ÿ0 ‘ÿ #ÿ 0 ‘ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ/582 ÿ 4ÿ0 ‘ÿÿ512%ÿÿ ‘ÿ48ÿ8291ÿ%525 ÿ51836ÿ 41826ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 8321ÿ89ÿ45ÿ8'261ÿ89ÿ834ÿ-82452 ÿ5ÿ%152ÿ9164ÿ2ÿ6582ÿ5 12%ÿ 416ÿÿ ÿ89ÿ0 ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ!ÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ/582 ÿÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿ 4ÿ0 ‘ÿÿ512%ÿÿ ‘ÿ48ÿ8291ÿ%525 ÿ51836ÿ 41826ÿ89ÿ45ÿ 8321ÿ89ÿ45ÿ8'261ÿ89ÿ834ÿ-82452 ÿ5ÿ%152ÿ41ÿ5 12%ÿ61%25ÿ2ÿ 65 5ÿ416ÿÿ ÿ89ÿ0 ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ ÿ $1832524ÿ #ÿ 5 6834182ÿÿ ÿ ÿ 56834182ÿ8ÿ2ÿ 085ÿÿ83218ÿ8546ÿ 5825ÿÿ83218ÿ/582 ÿ 4ÿ45ÿ8321ÿ55412%ÿ89ÿ0 ÿÿÿ5ÿ18325ÿ4ÿ34,,ÿÿ 15ÿ ÿ 82ÿ5 25’ ÿ0 8ÿ

$2%5 ÿ0 866ÿ 56ÿ 789:ÿ<ÿ=>ÿ?

Page 35 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL CLERK’S DEPARTMENT

AGENDA DATE:

April 2, 2019

SUBJECT:

Notice of Motion – Development Review

RECOMMENDATION: That Council support the recommendation from the Development Services Committee to express concerns that the current approval and regulatory process for development does not adequately protect our lakes and wetlands and does not take full account of the concerns of local communities; And further that the Ministry be asked to ensure that our lakes and wetlands are protected and local communities are given full input in the development process; And that Council express concerns with respect to the closing of Local Planning Appeal Support Centre by June 30, 2019 and the decision to no longer accept new request for professional services to the public and strongly urge and support the continuation of LPASC; And further be it resolved that this motion be circulated to the Minister of Municipal Affairs, the Premier of Ontario and the leader of the Opposition. BACKGROUND: At the Council Meeting of January 8, 2019, Councillor Sutherland served a notice of motion regarding the province undertaking a fundamental review of all aspects of the development review process. Council referred this matter to the Development Services Committee. At their meeting held on February 25, 2019 the Committee recommended the support of the motion with additional concerns regarding the closing of LPAS Centres as outlined above. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Not at this time. ATTACHMENTS: n/a

Submitted/approved by: Angela Maddocks, Clerk

Our strength is our community.

Page 36 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL CLERK’S DEPARTMENT

AGENDA DATE:

April 2, 2019

SUBJECT:

Notice of Motion – SFCSC Board – Appoint Members

RECOMMENDATION: That Council appoint two Council Member(s) to the Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation Board for the 2018 to 2022 term of Council and the Council members appointed are:

BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-law 2017-76 establishes the process for Notice of Motion. After meeting with Board Members from the Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation on March 19, 2019 to review and discuss the services they provide, Councillor Roberts served a notice of motion to appoint two members of Council to the Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation Board. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and voted on. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Not at this time. ATTACHMENTS: n/a

Submitted/approved by: Angela Maddocks, Clerk

Our strength is our community.

Page 37 of 192

Report to Council OFFICE OF C.A.O.

AGENDA DATE:

April 2, 2019

SUBJECT:

Strategic Planning Process

RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopts the Strategic Planning Timeline as outlined in the Coordination of Public Input attachment, and direct the CAO to coordinate, schedule and promote the various stages in the plan. BACKGROUND: Council passed the following resolution on Feb 19, 2019: Whereas, the intent of a Strategic Plan is to:    

Set direction and priorities; Align resources with priorities; Simplify decision making; and Communicate the message effectively.

Therefore be it resolved that Council direct staff to develop a timeline for Council’s Strategic Planning Process, which includes:  

community consultation; and adoption before and consideration in the 2020 budget discussions

And Further that once the process and the resulting Strategic Plan is adopted, that staff:   

develop operational plans for the implementation of the plan; link the adopted operational initiatives to the 2021 and subsequent Budget submissions; and report on the progress of implementing the plan on a quarterly basis, commencing in 2021.

At the time of the motion, Council questioned the benefit of engaging an external consultant to assist in the process and Staff pointed out that the new CAO should be actively involved in the development of the Strategic plan if they are to oversee its implementation. With the linkages between the Strategic Plan and the budget staff felt it helpful to illustrate the timing of: the proposed Strategic Planning Process, the budget cycle and consultations that staff anticipate for a number of major projects (see attached). Council will note that Proposed Strategic Plan Timeline is anchored around the production of the June Newsletter that is mailed to all residents with their tax bill. This method of communication ensures that every household is aware of the opportunity to provide input into the strategic planning process. While an on line tool is proposed for gathering input from a broad group, this is supplemented by four district open houses in August. These meetings will serve two purposes: one to introduce the new CAO to the community and the second is to meet face to face with constituents. These meetings are hosted by the Mayor and two Councilors from each district and are held locally.

Our strength is our community.

Page 38 of 192

Report to Council OFFICE OF C.A.O.

All the information from the on line tool and the four district open houses will be compiled and will serve as the basis for Council and the Management team to craft the strategic plan document. This meeting may be facilitated by the new CAO or Council could choose to have a consultant involved so that the new CAO can more actively participate in the discussions. Following this process a draft would be prepared and public delegations could be scheduled before Council, prior to adoption on October 15. Following adoption of the plan a communication strategy would be put in place to inform the public of the key elements and staff would begin implementing and monitoring progress as per the original motion. As per the attached timeline the budget developed by staff and tabled on November 5 would reflect the outcomes of the asset management plan, the long range financial plan discussions, the direction set by Council on September 3 and the insight gained by participating in the development of the draft strategic plan. On Saturday November 16, Council would have the benefit of being able to consider the budget in light of its newly formed strategic priorities. As highlighted in the work plan for major projects there are a number of open houses that are designed to be shared. The target audience for each session has been structured to keep discussion focused among differing participants and to simplify the gathering of input. These session are not as broad as the Strategic Planning process, but will formulate input into key directional documents that will contribute to the Township’s vision.

FINANCIAL / STAFFING IMPLICATIONS To be determined.

ATTACHMENTS Coordination of Public Input

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Wayne Orr, CAO

Our strength is our community.

Page 39 of 192

Coordination of Public Input Other Day

TUESDAY

NO Meeting

Proposed Budget Cycle

Proposed Strategic Planning Timeline

Apr‐02

Proposed Strat Plan schedule

Apr‐09

Open discussion and direction on Strat Plan objectives Asset Management Plan Need for a Consultant?

Apr‐16 Apr‐23

Apr‐30

May‐07

Confirm broad input areas

May‐14

LAST DAY for council to confirm schedule

May‐21 May‐28

Work Plan for major projects (key dates only)

RFP for Growth Plan

Award Growth Plan Contract

Development Charges Study Background Study released X

Jun‐04

On Line Tool is launched

Jun‐11

Long Range Financial Plan discussions

Tax Bill Communication ‐ FIXED DATE

Jun‐18 Jun‐25

Jul‐02

Public Meeting on Development Charges Study

Jul‐09

Jul‐16

Jul‐23

Jul‐30

Aug‐01

District OPEN HOUSE ‐ introduce new CAO Aug‐06

Aug‐08 Aug‐13

Aug‐20

Aug‐27

District OPEN HOUSE ‐ introduce new CAO District OPEN HOUSE ‐ introduce new CAO District OPEN HOUSE ‐ introduce new CAO

SHARED OPEN HOUSE (Lake / environmental Focus) for Official Plan, Growth Management Plan and Asset Management Service Levels

Page 40 of 192 Other Day

TUESDAY

NO Meeting

Sep‐03

Proposed Budget Cycle

Proposed Strategic Planning Timeline

Budget direction

Sep‐05

Council and Mgmt. meeting ‐ DAY TIME Sep‐10 Sep‐17 Sep‐24

Work Plan for major projects (key dates only)

Table DRAFT Strategic Plan

SHARED OPEN HOUSE (Hamlet Focus) for Official Plan, Growth Management Plan, Asset Management Service Levels and Water System

Oct‐01

Non Public Works capital Public Delegations on Draft

Oct‐08

Public Works capital

Oct‐15

ADOPT Strategic Plan and Communicate

Oct‐22

Oct‐29

Nov‐05

Table DRAFT BUDGET

Nov‐12

Budget delegations

Nov‐16

SHARED OPEN HOUSE (Rural Focus) for Official Plan, Growth Management Plan and Asset Management Service Levels

Table DRAFT ‐ OP Vision and Goals based on Public input

SATURDAY Budget Session Nov‐19 Nov‐26

Dec‐03

Budget revisions tabled

Dec‐10

Budget debate

Dec‐17

Adopt budget

Dec‐24

Dec‐31

RFP for OP Consultant

Page 41 of 192

Page 42 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE:

April 2, 2019

REPORT DATE:

March 26, 2019

SUBJECT:

Agreements for Temporary Dwellings & Trailers for Temporary Living Accommodation

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the use of the attached template agreements when the Building Department is issuing permits for two temporary dwellings on one lot and for trailers for temporary living accommodation during construction. BACKGROUND: At the March 25, 2019 meeting of the Development Services Committee, the Committee recommended Council approve the use of the attached template agreements when the Building Department is issuing permits for two temporary dwellings on one lot and for trailers for temporary living accommodation during construction. Temporary Two Dwelling Agreement There has been several circumstances where Building has been requested and have issued conditional permits to permit residents to construct a new dwelling and continue to live in the existing home on the property during construction. This situation is contemplated in the Building By-law for the Township, By-law 2014-26. This is a situation that is contemplated in the Building By-law. In Schedule “C”, Part 3 of the Building By-law, there is a table of fees (Table 3 – Conditional Permits and Agreements) that includes that a condition building permit can be obtained from the Township where a temporary two dwelling agreement is in place. The fee for this agreement is $227.00, plus a refundable $10,000 deposit. See attachment 1 for a copy of this section of the building by-law. While the Building By-law speaks to an agreement, it has not been the recent practice to have property owners enter into an agreement or to collect the deposit. If property owners have to enter into an agreement and pay the deposit – the Township would be in a better position to enforce the requirement to demolish the original dwelling following occupancy. Attachment #2 is a Temporary Two Dwelling Agreement Template that has been prepared by the Township solicitor. Consistent with the Building By-law, Development services staff intend to use this agreement and collect the $10,000 deposit on a go forward basis when Building is requested to issue a permit for a new dwelling, while continuing to occupy the original dwelling during construction. Dwelling Trailers Under a Temporary Living Agreement The South Frontenac Zoning By-law, section 5.16 Temporary Uses permits: “A mobile home or travel trailer may be permitted as temporary living accommodations provided a building permit has been obtained for 1 Our strength is our community.

Page 43 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT the permanent dwelling, a sewage disposal permit has been obtained from the appropriate authority and a permit from the Township is issued in accordance with the municipality’s temporary living accommodations policy.” The temporary living accommodations policy referred to in the Zoning By-law is the Township’s Trailer By-law 2004-93. The Trailer By-law provides an exemption in section 4.2 that: “Where a building permit for a single family dwelling unit has been issued by the Township’s Chief Building Official, and where the Zoning By-law permits such, the permit holder may enter into an agreement for the placement of a trailer on the property where the unit is being constructed or reconstructed solely for the purpose of the construction and only if any applicable fees are paid and the trailer is promptly removed prior to the expiration of the said building permit.” While the Township does not have many requests to place a trailer on a property during construction, the Zoning By-law, the fact that this situation is permitted in our by-laws warrants the Township to have a template agreement that can be used in these situations. The Building By-law includes a fee for this agreement is $227.00, plus a refundable $3,000 deposit. See attachment 1 for a copy of this section of the building by-law. A template agreement has been prepared by the Township’s solicitor. Authorization to Enter into Agreements Agreements for temporary uses would be brought to Council to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into these agreements. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: None. Staff time is compensated by the fee that is required to be paid under the Building By-law to prepare the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Excerpt from By-law 2014-26 – the Building By-law Attachment 2 - Temporary Two Dwelling Agreement Template Attachment 3 – Dwelling Trailers under Temporary Living Agreement Template

Prepared by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO/Deputy-Clerk

2 Our strength is our community.

Page 44 of 192

tti

)

-0

0 0

-5

(/)

a) a

€Q

ai o

Ll-

Oa)

aJ:) O (/)’ :la)

(U C ,9

JC-n

coo)vj)

uo Ca) j)J:c “E ;,> 8.oc@a.o’

E 5’ 9 c

:EEEEa€mg!’m”.E-oBaC:u no’ aCg,@c

o< JO ‘o (3) ,, +-!-3 m0O (B!Cffl!

n o

)

ctt

ffi

n a)

Ih-

14-

ffi

n c

I.-

(’)’

ffi

€ c m

U) :I

ti’i a

C%l

0 0

a’J: (/)o

:B ,$ D,

t5,ai

5CL al

Qffi

ai !

:} J:l

J:} ai

C )

as a

o C:

a+ n o O

00 ao

0 0

a:i n o c:i

C%l 0

Cn C

) J:l

ai !

o ff

:> J)

n ai

:I J)

:I CD ai

c yZ

:) Cfl ai

n m

a) 3

‘+-

a ffi-h-i

LL(

‘1

j o .Q

3:!L

a&> 040 aOjas m,5

e a>

aE €;

E a

o o W tp a’J”

:5 CTh ao

C O C:

n o

a+ € c :}

ai !

a$ Cl O C: :}

o Cn

l.-

o n

0 @%l

ai a

I-

a CL

CC;

(Q :) o J:

ai a

c n

@CL

@)Ul (0,,-

ai at

€

0 0

o V o O

(D a O c :l

a)-

u o

C71 ai

:) oi a)

ffl

g eE

t"m

J:.>

m l(/)

ai CL

0 0

a)J:

a:lQ oW

CQo

(DCI

O c

-i-iU} U)Q

m

c o

5’€E

(/) (D

ai C: c o

c o

!g:

Cfl c

€

3 E

ai o

ffi

-l-I

n c

:I> ’n o (l) €/) w -wQJ–n c o

24 0’ E a=na@

w s(;1 co a) a)jD , -, (Q

00’o–’ 00’–.E –(J)(J)

0 <t w y m +v>5oz w €Q m g a)

0 0 C%l

-4-; U)

U) :}

a a m

ai !

)

-; c :}

ffi

€/)

tp CL

ffi

0’

:} Cr

ai CL

@@J)

p0m ehh

o n o O

Cj)

–0)

m,;

.*- C.

:}:} (7J)

m J:-

@a)

€5

Co)

@):) CLC)

CLO

-50

(60

38 Q5

‘Cl

B. E

C).S)

a aa

‘ai

€l aa

‘V

-k-I !5 ,u , ca)

J: a)0 ,m

Bffl

V ai :I

IU)

0 0 00

0’!l CN

0 0

N 0

o c ai CL :l C) o o

:I J)

) Cr ai

+-a0

z(D

CLffi

-3% .C-

J:1 a-: Cl(0

. - U) CL’-

O :I

;>:l

$CL !

u c m W :S u u

CL;)

“,n oc r:rai Ea =ai

Om o g)-i-

a)CT)

oa) W

c o

-JC) c

U)0

)

€

C)) C

c o o

E a) n tti ) O :}

-7 o

t:n c

0 0

-5

l.-

m o

tti a)

a k

o n

n n

I-

lh-

a e L

U) )

(/) :}

n c

m g

-W

ll-

o o a) a:i

ai a

E0 n

ai CjHQ C:0

‘C5Cl k

)CL a)CO

I.4w

14- - -

J:C: “0 .(/) 0:} o(QC ffi0 o 20

C% C: n

E tti n

a) tp

:} €

E? ‘a) a)

C- (. ao m(l) =ia)= :)C’ o o a’i

ci3P ffi

ai a

U) C:

o o

eo C:

o )

:} Cr o

n ai

o 0 ff

a 0

0 (0

ffi

a CL

U) c

€a’ mO (paC) c

I-

?, a)n

,g) Cn U) ,E

0’-

:} c €CCl

U) c

(6a)

,5 jq

,JO

5’C5

<:!2 <s ::3

0 0

L-

n C: m €/) ) o J:

e m R

a W

)a)

,E!! CZB €Q@ Cj) U) -

nO C:}

.( m a) ..0 m -w W nu) O.=a)o

‘:}’ ffiBg a)a) -Ea

ZC/)c

o e ts

= .:

U) ffi ! U) o C() ::”’

wC.

o a+

CQ4) -v5 aa

a31

e W

d m

E e L

ffi

14-

a+ a a0

91 a.l

a5’

a) (0

ffi

j ,iU ‘21

?i’iilNii.. ffl :iliiii il awl ??g oa5 ’e’ ag

EE ll s C u.l c a> g €a) -’ J: H S S hc l

Nl #l

Zl <l

a:lm)

Page 45 of 192 U) e a) L a

:g m U)

-h-I

c Mm

E ‘?

< o6

art

)

art e L

,!2, B5 ‘!;‘O 0 0 0

ffi

)

ffi

art

,(U,

,m c c na-

(l)0

C:-Q

!(l) 0-+-

‘!a

n m

JO m

0 0

0 0 0

art

ti’i

0 0

art

0 0 0 CQ

.0 m n C

art

-5

n m

art

.Cj:

n az

?5 n tp c N

‘:t:i

I-

c :)

€/) )

’e:a c

)

azg

cnfo ,c ffi

%?a

ea C ea”

Wfa

offi

€e

fflE

%%# g

SC) NCL Na) nn

??0 ?;7, (/)

‘a 0,

a) a)

‘-l-I fl% .a)

art

e?O

C%la)

.U) h0

m .0’-

art art

CL CL tti

0 0

U) )

0 0

C%i

U) :I

S C%l C%l

C%l C%J 6e

(l).CL

a):

art a)

tu a)

Il-

a:i

ll-

-(U? ?U)

a) a:i

n ttt O

0)’

n m o

) a

n m O

-IU) m (JJ

art tu

(1)U)

(Q:$

11-(/)

J)30 ffl–

(/) :I

a)go u fal.JOo

€ co n c

(ln

-C

N N a,

.11-’?i ll% ?

CL CL

€

Cj).> .c? N

aj C)

I.-

a:i 2

-: CL

§E

Cr.!4-e cr.-!

art

CL ‘a:!

lh-

(YO2

a) .(0 -C:

(-7:} CI’

4;:4?y % ??? ?m

a)Cp

??(-)a5 ()(u

3 P

at (/) :}

rff

t.:

N ‘CI + N (:l)l

0111111

tri (U

I.-

a a

- 0 @.a

?1(D

(Qa)

: (U

8, j.o H.

. f @> r%@)

Nn N aC) w C%IC Cn #(11 as

B;5

tp 0 U)U) n U) U) a

(l) a :} @ o

I-

E ,’ E !!! wE o jp !! C

a:i C. , > <5 n

!!!4 :,,’?‘aaa ?a5 =, E “o ?C; .9 cj) €D

:W=(.

aa) <@€

c art

m(p

-: CL

;

11 0 CL

ci=

, .E ‘5 ‘B o

: a)

e e

:) a7’ ?B

@)5m (B7LS5

(l!O Ce(/)

ME 5?: ?’ a! a2

,?j e ‘(tl oM as?(.? .ffl v .3 E a) q?5.3E

y€

a) %

ffi j) .’! s U) :=-r C

art a

“0

@:? i g

art

E am

‘a@) :. aS ’e

‘il ,.>

J% fl% ?

< @6

a(0

J:5 aO

O a’p€

:> CL ‘; (;T

D"w’o ,?=

la .i-(l) :: QJ a’ :} )

hlc 0H€

2 a) (0 -”

V(’

U2)

,:!!?

=oH Wc5"N .,E 0""‘cm :54,.= :., =m>Iooo j Dm,.

l.‘o “? ‘-:oa’ “a’ o:."‘o?-U?h:=o:%";a” :E’= cmo:-.

.a!aiao9a)ai .Ez

ii- 3

E! a?O cm -E: ‘?g O EE,?.)a5? O s e affl E o

e a.

o c

C/lo

j0 E o:

(;zC))

c :€=

a)-

‘‘CTIOO CTI O Q gi C c w (l) w O i :; -0

s m

;

as c

o ::

v C o

(l).0 3 ‘:

.o. ?51

aEL5

mts.,O a)))o oO O?? '

o l

EBe’e % ‘:3 C m

S CCI m o-

a .m (

os, .§ S : rEjB

‘i K# aB€

,O h

C(Q

to ??OE

ffiE

E, ,a'9’ “;) W

aco: :?’? “‘B? ?S

K,,.g,m

C)) C

a(7 C

‘5a

‘i

)8 CQo

C4} oc.i

(!)

n m

o z

a)a)

@l,:i

?‘J:)

a) 0 0

art

a6 ‘c

CL 0 0

0 J:

e a)

0 0

s O

CL’-

a) (0

c o

c CD

Oa”?? a)

CO (0

-l-I

O C

e I :’ w i (J) 01”

$la2

’ l C:

oil, li(.i

il(Q m

.-?? l ii,,o

5?E -qlE

;’?“c 52 C p

lj)

I-

@0 E C)

6s 5E

C-i-

(14-I s

(p,9

a:i

art

s-3

‘j Cj)

ff o (t)

jc pa

‘w0

I.- - ffi

-(tl c

in l-

s-€J) (1324 ng => €

o a art I.-

ffi

I-

E art art CL

; Q art

a) o 0

a) 9g 55 (U aC} a5;

:tE

ffil?’% ‘J) tp CLa) i4-€

-hJ

uE8

a)S

0 0

0 0)

0 o:i

3 a) as

3(Y

J: U)

:ffl o

o3 4-U)

OU) 5’ l–hJ -l-I a-

c o

O Cw

Qa)

OCn

U)E 765

CL U) c

a 12

G IG:

art

m CL

a) €

14-

0 m

–t (!5 (1

.hJ

€ ffi

€’(D

a)m lto

tu n U) ‘0 a$ o

c €

,, IQ -=la)la)a)

C( a) C

C))

Cl,

g>E. ul)U I ‘% ce i€l.L,l’uU ’e a’-jU= ljt, $noJ V’ !> n

a - :)IO a)l U) a)

% e lco cel S a

.Ola)U)lCa ?>(! o81 5L?o j31 .j:! ?:P tu

(0 c

ae € -e bE

a; a

U} c o :j;, m o

U) n E C €0

(tl

ffl u

go-U)

n a) :I €Q €/)

art ? I(j) ::I C. 0 c

‘i.m

(

a’i

:b’C)

m0 “C))

,,o

l? .c?? c3

I*-

.8a5 :5 o

CL gl(.s:

U:l:O aT a) (Drffiffi

;; m art CLC

a:i,§

Ll’

a) :5 (?1 m O-?‘a’a 01 (l) 05!??l0 ;E’ a,;?0 ?. o ?l -:

g O 01 0 0) sw .’!l O)

ffi

(OC

‘:l’:il=iN

;0?ol W

U) C:

mi=

O€!’ a)m

–ma &-mm &-$O

n n

m e 0

o CL (/) C

o I N

o o m

o :: u c :$

Page 46 of 192

z <

‘#

}

L# )

]

Page 47 of 192

THIS AGREEMENT made this _______ day of __________, 2019. BETWEEN:

hereinafter called the “Owner” OF THE FIRST PART

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC hereinafter called the “Municipality” OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owner is the registered owner of those lands and premises being _________________________________________________________, as more particularly described as ____________________ (the “Owner’s Lands”); AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to commence construction of a residential dwelling on the Owner’s Lands; AND WHEREAS the Owner has applied for a building permit to construct a new single detached dwelling house on the Owner’s Lands, which permit shall only be issued after this Agreement is executed and all securities provided; AND WHEREAS Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 (the “Zoning By-law”) does not permit more than one dwelling on a lot; AND WHEREAS the Owner’s Lands contains a dwelling as of the date of this Agreement (the “existing dwelling”). AND WHEREAS the Owner has requested permission to reside in the existing dwelling until such time as the new single detached dwelling house has been constructed and is available for its occupancy, and to immediately thereafter cease occupation of the existing dwelling and to demolish the existing dwelling; AND WHEREAS the Municipality is willing to grant its permission on the condition that the Owner enters into this agreement on the terms set out herein; NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree each with the other as follows: 1.

The Owner shall be permitted to occupy the existing dwelling until the earlier of: (a)

On or before ____________________; or

(b)

the date that is thirty (30) days following the date on which an occupancy permit for the new single detached dwelling house is issued by the Municipality.

Upon the occurrence of the first of the dates referred to in Clause 1 above, the

Page 48 of 192

Owner shall immediately cease all use of and forthwith thereafter cease occupation of the existing dwelling. Within 30 days of the first of the dates referred to in Clause 1 above, the Owner shall cause the existing dwelling to be demolished in accordance with a demolition permit issued by the Municipality and shall dispose of the debris legally according to the waste disposal and recycling by-laws of the Municipality and all other applicable laws. 3.

The Owner further agrees that it shall not permit any person to occupy the existing dwelling as a tenant at any time during the term of this Agreement. In the event that the Owner breaches this provision and allows a tenant to occupy the existing dwelling, the Owner acknowledges and agrees that it is the Owner’s sole responsibility to comply with the Residential Tenancies Act, which includes at a minimum arranging for alternative accommodation for the tenant at the Owner’s sole cost. At no time shall the occupancy of the existing dwelling by a tenant constitute a bar at law to the Municipality exercising its rights under this Agreement.

For greater certainty, the permission granted in this Agreement shall not and is not intended to establish any non-conforming rights to continue any residential use of the existing dwelling, nor to allow the existing dwelling to be used for any other use, whether or not such use might be permitted under the Zoning By-law.

As security for the Owner’s obligation to cease occupation of the existing dwelling in accordance with this Agreement and thereafter demolish the existing dwelling, the Owner shall, upon entering into this Agreement, deposit with the Municipality the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in cash or by certified cheque (the “Security Deposit”).

After the Owner has ceased occupation of the existing dwelling and demolished said dwelling to the satisfaction of the Municipality, the Municipality shall forthwith return the Security Deposit, or the balance thereof remaining, to the Owner without interest and this Agreement shall be at an end and of no further force or effect.

As long as the Owner is not in default of its obligations under this Agreement, the Municipality shall take no action or initiate any proceedings against the Owner to enforce the requirements of the Zoning By-law.

In the event of default by the Owner of any of its obligations under this Agreement, and if such default is not remedied to the complete satisfaction of the Municipality within ten (10) days of written notice of such default, the Municipality shall be entitled to take such action and initiate such proceedings against the Owner as the Municipality deems necessary to ensure full compliance with the requirements of the Zoning By-law.

In addition to and without limiting any rights or remedies available at law to the Municipality to enforce the requirements of the Zoning By-law, the Owner further acknowledges and agrees that in the event of its default under this Agreement,

Page 49 of 192

and if such default is not remedied to the complete satisfaction of the municipality within ten (10) days of written notice of such default, the Municipality and its authorized agents and contractors shall have the right to enter onto the Owner’s Lands and demolish the existing dwelling at the Owner’s full cost and expense. In the event that the Municipality exercises its rights under this Agreement to demolish the existing dwelling, the Municipality may draw on the Security Deposit to recover any costs expended, but the Municipality’s damages shall not be limited to the Security Deposit held by it. The Owner agrees that it shall reimburse the Municipality for all costs incurred by the Municipality to enforce the terms of this Agreement, howsoever caused, and any such additional costs may be placed on the Tax Roll of the Owner’s Lands and collected in the same manner as municipal taxes, or recovered in any manner available to the Municipality at law. 10.

Without limiting the generality of any of the foregoing paragraphs, the Owner acknowledges and agrees that in the event it is in default of any provision of this Agreement the Municipality shall be entitled to plead this Agreement as an estoppel to any claim of the Owner that it has any legal entitlement to continue to occupy or otherwise use the existing dwelling. The Owner further acknowledges that damages are an inadequate remedy for a breach of this Agreement by the Owner and in that case the Municipality shall be entitled to injunctive relief, the Owner acknowledging and agreeing that the continued occupancy or use of the existing dwelling constitutes irreparable harm to the Municipality and its ability to enforce its Zoning By-law.

The Owner shall pay on a full indemnity basis all legal and other costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with the preparation, execution or enforcement of this Agreement.

Time shall be of the essence hereof in all respects; and the right of the Municipality to require strict performance by the Owners of any and all obligations imposed on them hereunder shall not be affected in any way by any previous waiver, forbearance or course of dealing.

If any provision of this Agreement shall be found or declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable or ultra vires the Municipality, then such provision shall conclusively be deemed to be severable and the remainder of this Agreement, mutatis mutandis, shall be and remain in full force and effect.

Any amount owing by the Owner to the Municipality under the terms of this agreement shall be a debt and shall accrue interest at the rate of 1.25% per month (15% per annum) from the date on which the Municipality incurred costs and expenses to the date on which the amount owing is paid in full.

The Municipality shall have the right in addition to any other remedies available to it and without further notice to the Owner to use the Security Deposit to recover all costs and expenses incurred by and all amounts owing to the

Page 50 of 192

Municipality in accordance with this Agreement. 16.

In this Agreement, unless the contrary intention appears, words importing only singular number or masculine gender shall include persons, parties or things of the same kind than one and the feminine and neuter gender; and if there be more than one Owner, including any subsequent owners of the Land, the covenants of such Owner shall be joint and several.

This Agreement shall be governed according to the laws of Ontario.

This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first written above. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED in the presence of: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Per:

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Angela Maddocks, Clerk We have the authority to bind the Corporation. OWNER Per:

Name:

Page 51 of 192

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Building Department PO Box 100, 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0 Telephone: (613) 376-3027 or 1-800-559-5862 Fax: (613) 376-6657

TEMPORARY LIVING ACCOMODATIONS AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC By-Law No. 2004-93 Section 4.2 provides for an exemption from the prohibition against placing trailers on properties and residing in said trailers. The Township agrees to permit the Property Owner identified below to place a trailer on the Property identified in this agreement for a period of time not to exceed the maximum period listed below, provided that the Property Owner complies with the terms of this agreement. In exchange for permission to place and occupy a trailer on the Property, the Property Owner agrees that the trailer shall only be occupied by the Property Owner and their immediate family members and only for the period of time while a dwelling unit is being constructed on the Property (as further specified below). The Property Owner further agrees to pay the fee specified below and to deposit with the Township the Deposit Fee. The Property Owner agrees that the Township may remove the trailer from the Property in circumstances where the trailer remains on the Property beyond the time agreed to by the parties for its removal. Where the trailer remains on the Property after the expiry of the deadline established for its removal in this agreement, the Property Owner hereby irrevocably gives to the Township and its agents’ license to enter on the Property and to remove the trailer and any contents within the trailer. If the Property Owner does not take possession of the trailer (and pay any fees associated with the removal and storage of the trailer) within 30 days of removal, the Township has full and unfettered discretion to dispose of the trailer and its contents. Any costs incurred by the Township to remove, store or dispose of the trailer and its contents shall be reimbursed by the Property Owner and the property Owner authorizes the Township to draw down on its Deposit Fee for any such reimbursement. In the event that the Deposit Fee is insufficient to reimburse the Township, the Property Owner agrees that it remains liable for any costs incurred. Under no circumstances shall the Township or its agents be liable for any costs, damages, losses or claims associated with the removal and disposal of the trailer and its contents. Property Owner:_________________________________________________________ Owners Address:________________________________________________________ Roll #:_________________________________________________________________ Telephone:

Cell:

Page 52 of 192

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Building Department PO Box 100, 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0 Telephone: (613) 376-3027 or 1-800-559-5862 Fax: (613) 376-6657 Building Permit Number: Address of property where trailer is located:

A trailer is permitted to remain on the Property for a limited period of ______ months, commencing upon the date this agreement is executed. The fee of $227.00 per unit has been paid:

Yes

The deposit fee of $3000.00 per unit has been paid:

Yes

Chief Building Official

Property Owner

Date: _________________________

Date: __________________________

Page 53 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE: REPORT DATE:

April 2, 2019 March 26, 2019

SUBJECT:

Compensation for Public Members of Committee of Adjustment

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council provide a per diem of $20 to the public members of the Committee, for attending site visits outside of their district at the request of the Director of Development Services. BACKGROUND: In January 2019, a member of Committee Adjustment inquired with Development Services staff about whether there has been any discussion about a raise in compensation for members of the South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment. A raise in the per diem paid to members had not been included in the draft 2019 staff budget presented to Council. The CAO had raised the question of increasing compensation for Committee of Adjustment members with South Frontenac Council at the January 26, 2019 Committee of the Whole budget meeting. Council referred compensation for Committee of Adjustment members back to the Committee of Adjustment to make a recommendation to Council. Direction was provided to Development Services staff to bring the matter forward to the February 14, 2019 Committee of Adjustment Meeting for consideration. Currently, public members of the Committee of Adjustment are compensated at $50.00 per meeting and are paid 0.55 cents per kilometer to attend site visits and meetings. In accordance with Council policy, members of Council who are appointed to the Committee of Adjustment receive the same compensation as public members ($50.00 per diem + 0.55 cents/km). Generally, both public and Council Committee members visit sites within their own District. The Committee was advised that because Councillors are compensated in accordance with Council policy, the Committee of Adjustment could only consider compensation for public members at this time. Any change to Councillor compensation would require a change in Council’s compensation policy. Staff undertook a survey of compensation rates for the other three Committee of Adjustment within Frontenac County. The below information was shared in a report to the Committee of Adjustment from the Director of Development Services: 



Frontenac Islands and Central Frontenac have Committees of Adjustment solely made up by Council members. Council members are not compensated over and above the Councillors’ normal renumeration. Central Frontenac will be reviewing Council renumeration later this year. North Frontenac only has public members on their Committee of Adjustment (3 members). North Frontenac Township pays the Committee Members $106.72 per meeting and $19.65 to complete a site inspection. They also get paid 0.55 cents per kilometer for mileage. They receive mileage to attend the meeting and for site inspections.

Our strength is our community.

Page 54 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Mileage is paid out at 0.55 cents/km for both public members and Council members of the Committee of Adjustment. This mileage rate is also consistent for staff in South Frontenac. It is recommended that the mileage rate remain consistent for public members at the current 0.55 cents/km. It is noted that the amount of the per diem is less in South Frontenac relative to the North Frontenac Committee of Adjustment. That said, due to the volume of applications, the South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment has 11 regularly scheduled meetings a year. The volume of applications in North Frontenac is approximately 1/3 of the volume of applications in South Frontenac. As such there are some months where North Frontenac Committee of Adjustment may not meet, unlike South Frontenac that has 11 regular monthly meetings scheduled a year. At the February 14, 2019 meeting, there was discussion involving all members of the Committee about compensation. Much of the discussion centred on the time that members spend doing site visits. It was noted by members that the volume of applications considered by the Committee can mean that members are spending a significant amount of time completing site visits. All members conduct site visits in their own Districts but a number of members have/were interested in attending site visits outside of their District. Discussion occurred about whether that was required or if that was a voluntary decision to undertake addition site visits for information. The discussion concluded with agreement from members that each member has the responsibility to undertake site visits in their own Districts, but that if there was a particularly complex or challenging file, at the request of the Director of Development Services, all members would be asked to visit the site. Committee members discussed that in this instance, it would be appropriate for further compensation to be provided to members. At the February 14, 2019 meeting, the Committee of Adjustment passed the resolution 19:01:13: THAT the South Frontenac Committee of Adjustment recommend Council provide a per diem of $20 to the public members of the Committee for site visits outside of their district at the request of the Director of Development Services. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS:  An increase in the per diem paid to public members of the Committee of Adjustment would result in a modest increase to the Development Services operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: None Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer Prepared by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services

Our strength is our community.

Page 55 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning Report – Zoning Bylaw Amendment Report Date:

March 26, 2019

Application No:

Z-19/03

Owner:

Robert Rice

Location of Property:

Part Lot 25, Concession 13, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 179 Burnt Point Lane

Purpose of Application: Rezone the severed lands from Rural (RU) Zone to site specific Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW-122) and rezone the retained lands from Rural (RU) Zone to Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) as a condition of a consent application S-59-18-L Date of Public Meeting: March 19, 2019

Recommendation It is recommended that the by-law rezoning Part Lot 25, Concession 13, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 179 Burnt Point Lane be passed.

Proposal An application has been submitted to amend the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw 2003-75 to rezone the subject property owned by Rob Rice for the severed lands from Rural (RU) Zone to site specific Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW-122) and rezone the retained lands from Rural (RU) Zone to Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) as a condition of a consent application S-59-18-L in order to fulfill condition 9 of consent application S-5918-L for the creation of one new waterfront lot that was processed by the Township in October 2018.

Background The subject property has received provisional consent approval for application S-59-18-L for the creation of one new residential limited services waterfront lot from an existing property at Part Lot 25, Concession 13, District of Loughborough, municipally known as 179 Burnt Point Lane. The severed lands will consist of approximately 22 acres with 91 metres of frontage along Burnt Point Lane from the existing 29 acre lot and 182 metres of frontage along Buck Lake. The retained lands consist of approximately 7 acres in area with approximately 274 metres of frontage along Buck Lake and Burnt Point Lane terminating at the subject property. The retained land will be irregularly shaped due to the configuration of the shoreline and the natural topography of the lot. A new entrance and driveway will be constructed from Burnt Point Lane to provide access for the severed lot. The existing lot has frontage on Burnt Point Lane with waterfrontage along Buck Lake (South Basin) and is heavily vegetated with some cleared trails on the property. The South Basin of Buck Lake is an at-capacity lake trout lake; stricter development controls are in place for the creation of new lots within 300 metres of at-capacity lakes. An Environmental Impact Assessment, prepared by Ontario Lake Assessments Environmental Consulting in August 2018, was submitted in support of the consent application. The EIA demonstrates the strict and protective conditions required by MOECC for the new lot on a “at capacity” lake that can be achieved through the rezoning of the severed property in order to ensure that there will be no impact to the water quality of Buck Lake nor to the habitat for lake trout as a result. A location for the septic system has been identified that meets the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (formerly Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change) policies for development on at-capacity lakes. The requirements of the EIA will be addressed in the Zoning Bylaw Amendment for the new lot. All development or site alterations on or adjacent to a sensitive lake trout lake is also subject to Site Plan Control. 1

Page 56 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning

A cottage is presently being constructed on the retained lands to replace the original cottage that was lost to fire; beyond the construction of the cottage no additional development is proposed for the retained lands. The retained lot is accessed by a private lane. The current zoning on the retained parcel is Rural which requires frontage on a public road. As the retained lands will continue to be accessed by a private lane, it is proposed as part of this rezoned application for the retained lands owned by Rob Rice will be rezoned from Rural (RU) Zone to Limited Service Waterfront Residential (RLSW) Zone to recognize this.

Public Meeting A public meeting was held under the Planning Act on March 19, 2019. No comments were provided by Council or members of the public.

Summary A comprehensive report reviewing this zoning by-law amendment against the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014, the County of Frontenac Official Plan and the South Frontenac Official Plan was provided to Council in advance of the March 19, 2019 public meeting. As this rezoning is consistent and conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014, the County of Frontenac Official Plan and the South Frontenac Official Plan and Zoning By-law, it is recommended Council approve this application by passing the attached by-law. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac

Date of Site Visit: February 28, 2019 Attachments:

Zoning By-law 2019-20

Page 57 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning Report – Zoning Bylaw Amendment Report Date:

March 26, 2019

Application No:

Z-19/04

Owner:

Joan McGowan

Location of Property:

Part Lot 6, Concession 3, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 71 Second Heaven Lane.

Purpose of Application: Rezone land from Rural (RU) Zone to the Special Limited Services Residential – Waterfront (RLSW-65) Zone as a condition of consent application S-97-18-B for a lot addition Date of Public Meeting: March 19, 2019

Recommendation It is recommended that the by-law rezoning Part Lot 6, Concession 3, District of Bedford, Township of South Frontenac, municipally known as 71 Second Heaven Lane be passed.

Proposal An application has been submitted to amend the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw 2003-75 to rezone the subject property owned by Joan McGowan for the severed lands from Rural (RU) Zone to site specific Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW-65) Zone as a condition of a consent application S-97-18-B. The rezoning is required in order to fulfill condition 9 of the consent application for the benefitting lands to one consistent zone to recognize the enhanced setback provisions of 40 metres. The consent application was processed by the Township in December 2018.

Background The subject property has received provisional consent approval for application S-97-18-B for a lot addition from an existing property at Part Lot 6, Concession 3, District of Bedford, municipally known as Second Heaven Lane. The severed lands will consist of approximately 2.7 acres of land with approximately 102 metres of frontage along Thirty Island Lake and will be merged with lands addressed as 71 Second Heaven Lane. The retained, 26 acre lot has 360 metres of frontage along Second Heaven Lane and has the required 91 metres of frontage along Thirty Island Lake. No development is proposed for the retained lands, although there is sufficient area to develop the lot in the future. The proposed benefitting lands will increase the size of the property at 71 Second Heaven Lane from 2.5 acres to 5.2 acres which will increase the size of the waterfront lot and will provide increased buffering for the enlarged parcel.

Public Meeting A public meeting was held under the Planning Act on March 19, 2019. No comments were provided from Council or members of the public.

Page 58 of 192

Report to Council Development Services - Planning As this rezoning is consistent and conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014, the County of Frontenac Official Plan and the South Frontenac Official Plan and Zoning By-law, it is recommended Council approve this application by passing the attached by-law. Submitted by: Trudy Gravel, CPT, AMCT, Planner, Township of South Frontenac Approved by: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services, Township of South Frontenac Attachments:

Zoning By-law 2019-21

Page 59 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE: REPORT DATE:

April 2, 2019 March 26, 2019

SUBJECT:

Subdivision Agreement for McFadden Road Plan of Subdivision (10T2017/001), Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc.

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council pass By-law Number 2019-22 authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a subdivision agreement with Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc. (Sean Marshall) for the McFadden Road Plan of Subdivision 10T-2017-001. BACKGROUND: McFadden Road plan of subdivision is located at 5550 McFadden Road, just south of the intersection of McFadden Road and Norway Road. The development is a five lot residential plan of subdivision with all proposed lots fronting on McFadden Road. There is very little “works” that are required to support this development. The only “works” for this plan of subdivision include the installation of a street light at the intersection of McFadden Road and Norway Road, and the relocation of a hydro pole in front of Lot 5. The street light has been installed, the Bell phone line has been relocated off the hydro pole in front of Lot 5 and is in the que for removal by Hydro One (invoice has already been paid to complete this work). The County issued draft plan approval of the plan of subdivision on February 21, 2018. A zoning by-law amendment (By-law 2017-78) was approved by South Frontenac Council in December 19, 2017. The attached subdivision agreement has been prepared in accordance with the draft conditions recommended by Township Council and approved by County Council. The agreement was prepared by the Township’s solicitor and has been reviewed with input from Township staff and the Developer, Sean Marshall (President of Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc.), and his solicitor. The developer is agreeable to the terms sent out in the agreement and signed the agreement on March 22nd, 2019. The agreement is unique in the sense that it has taken the standard agreement used by our Township solicitor and has modified it to “intentionally delete” sections of the agreement that would normally reference to internal “Works” (e.g internal roads, stormwater management facilities, parks, etc.) to be completed by the developer that do not apply to this development. As there are no internal works, there is no estimate for securities and therefore no securities will be collected. The value of cash-in-lieu of parkland was established to be $5,750 by Council at the February 19, 2019 Council meeting. The agreement stipulates that cash-in-lieu of parkland must be paid in advance of the first building permit being issued. PROCESS: Once the Mayor and Clerk enter into the subdivision agreement, Planning will advise the County that all Township conditions for draft approval have been met. The subdivision agreement will be forwarded to the Township solicitor to be registered on the title of the lands. Following this, the County consider final approval of the plan of subdivision application. Once the subdivision agreement is registered and final

Our strength is our community.

Page 60 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT approval is granted by the County, the lots in the plan of subdivision can be sold and building can begin. ATTACHMENTS:   

Attachment 1 - By-law to Execute Subdivision Agreement - Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc. Attachment 2 - Subdivision Agreement - McFadden Road (Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc.) Attachment 3 - McFadden Road Plan of Subdivision M-plan

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer Prepared by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services

Our strength is our community.

Page 61 of 192

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made in QUADRUPLICATE on the ______ day of ___________________, 2019 BETWEEN: PITTSBURGH BUILDING & ENERGY SYSTEMS INC.

the “OWNER” OF THE FIRST PART

and -

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC the “MUNICIPALITY” OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS the Owner has received approval from the County of Frontenac (file No. 10T2017/001) for a plan of subdivision for those lands described in Schedule “A”;

AND WHEREAS approval of the plan of subdivision has been given on the condition that the Owner enter into this agreement with the Municipality in accordance with section 51(26) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, chapter P-13, as amended;

NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree with each other as follows:

TERMS DEFINED 1.

In this agreement:

(a)

“Council” shall mean the elected Council of the Municipality;

(b)

Intentionally Deleted;

(c)

“Lands” shall mean those lands of the Owner described in Schedule “A”;

(d)

“Maintain” includes repair;

(e)

“Municipality” means the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac;

(f)

“Municipal Engineer” means a designated Municipal staff or such other person acting

in that capacity, or the consulting engineer appointed for that purpose by Council, and any authority granted to the Municipal Engineer by this agreement shall be exercised in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and without undue delay; (g)

“Municipal Specifications” shall mean the detailed description of construction,

materials and workmanship of works to be carried out by the Owner as prescribed by the Municipality in accordance with the “Ontario Provincial Standards for Roads and Public Works” (OPS), as amended, in effect on the date of the work, or such other additional requirements which may be specified by the Municipality; (h)

“Owner” includes an individual, a partnership, a corporation, an association, a joint

venture, a co-tenant, a trustee, or any agent or contractor carrying out any works for the Owner, and all subsequent owners of all or part of the Lands and wherever the singular is used 1

Page 62 of 192

it shall be construed to include the plural; (i)

“Plan” or “Plan of Subdivision” or “Subdivision” means the plan of subdivision

approved by the Municipality for the Lands described in Schedule “A”; (j)

Intentionally Deleted;

(k)

“Road” shall mean those public roads or any part or parts thereof, any day lighting

triangles, temporary turning circles, and any areas of road widening shown or laid out on the Plan of Subdivision, and the use of “Street” or “Public Highway” shall be synonymous with “Road”; (l)

Intentionally Deleted

(m)

“Works” means the whole works, services, materials, matters and things required to be

done or supplied by the Owner in accordance with this agreement except for the final grading of lots for which lot grading certificates will be supplied by applicants for building permits.

ORDER OF PROCEDURE 2.

As a condition of this agreement and without which this agreement shall have no effect,

the Owner shall: (a)

execute and deliver this agreement to the Municipality;

(b)

obtain a consent and postponement to registration of this agreement in a form

satisfactory to the Municipality from the holder of any mortgage or other encumbrance of the Lands that will be outstanding on the date of registration of the Plan; (c)

deposit with the Municipality the security and proof of insurance required by this

agreement; (d)

pay in full all outstanding taxes, drainage and unamortized local improvement charges

on the Lands; (e)

pay in full all outstanding invoices issued by the Municipality with respect to the Plan;

(f)

pay to the Municipality the amount of cash to be given in lieu of parkland, or deposit

with the Municipality the executed deeds for the parklands, whichever is applicable and prescribed by this agreement; (g)

deliver to the Municipality both two full size copies and an 11”x17” reduced copy of the

final Plan forwarded to the Municipality for registration and a digital copy of the plans in a format satisfactory to the Municipality; and (h)

deliver to the Municipality draft reference plans of survey illustrating all easements and

0.3 metre wide reserves not shown on the Plan, and all deeds and grants of easement executed in favour of the Municipality or any other public authority required by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to the Municipality.

Prior to starting construction of the Works in the Plan, the Owner shall: (a)

fulfill all of the conditions required by Clause 2 above unless otherwise approved in

writing by the Municipal Engineer; (b)

notify the Municipal Engineer in writing at least seventy-two hours (72) hours prior to

the start of construction; and (c)

Intentionally Deleted.

Prior to applying for any permits for construction of buildings within the Plan, the 2

Page 63 of 192

Owner shall have: (a)

received final approval for the Plan from the County of Frontenac or the Local

Planning Appeal Tribunal; (b)

received the required approvals from all applicable utility companies and

regulatory agencies; (c)

registered the Plan and the reference plans of survey referred to in Clause 2(h)

above; (d)

delivered copies of the final plan of subdivision and any reference plans and

engineering plans referred to in this Agreement in an electronic format acceptable to the Municipality; and (e)

complied with all requirements for issuing a building permit as set out in this

agreement.

ATTACHED SCHEDULES

The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this agreement:

Schedule “A”

Description of Lands

Schedule “B”

Description and Cost of Works to be Constructed

Schedule “C”

Description of Phases of Development

Schedule “D”

Time Schedule for Construction of Works

Schedule “E”

List of Approved Plans for Works to be Constructed

Schedule “F”

Lot Grading and Drainage Plans

Schedule “G”

Lands to be conveyed for Parkland or Cash in Lieu

Schedule “H”

Grants of Easement and Other Public Lands

Schedule “I”

Parkland, Fencing, Landscaping and Tree Preservation Requirements

Schedule “J”

Special Conditions

Schedule “K”

Notice to Subsequent Purchasers

Any plans referred to in any of the Schedules are incorporated by reference into this

Agreement. The originals of all plans incorporated by reference in this Agreement are on file in the offices of the Municipality and, in the event of any conflict, the originals on file shall govern.

CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS Scope of Work: 7.

The Owner shall construct and maintain all of the Works described in Schedule “B”

according to the plans and specifications in Schedules “E”, “F” and “I” in a good and workmanlike manner, to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer and according to Municipal Specifications.

If, at any time during construction or maintenance of the Works, the Municipal Engineer

determines that modifications to the Works are necessary to provide adequately any of the 3

Page 64 of 192

public services required by the Plan, the Owner shall construct such additional works to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer.

Roads

The Owner shall not cut any roads assumed by the Municipality without the prior

written consent of the Municipal Engineer, and all roads shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer as soon as possible after completion of the work. 10.

The Owner shall agree in writing that all entrances to any lots including entrance

culverts be located and constructed to the satisfaction of the Township. 11.

Where work is performed on existing roads outside the Plan of Subdivision, they shall

be reinstated to their original condition as determined by the Municipal Engineer. 12.

Any damage that occurs on a municipal road shall be repaired to their original

condition as determined by the Municipal Engineer. Repairs shall be made by Municipal staff, at the Owner’s sole cost. 13.

If, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer, it is necessary to change the grade of

existing roads adjacent to or abutting the Subdivision because of the development of the Subdivision, the Owner shall grade to sub-grade and reconstruct the roads in the manner and within the time stipulated by the Municipal Engineer and according to Municipal Specifications, all at the Owner’s expense.

Storm Water Management System 14.

The Owner shall construct the storm water management system to service the

land in the Subdivision and adjacent road allowances according to the plans and specifications set out in Schedules “E” and “F”.

Grading and Landscaping 15.

Upon substantial completion of any ditches, culverts, sidewalks and driveways,

the Owner shall plant seed as directed by the Municipal Engineer and in accordance with Municipal Specifications, if any, on all boulevards and other untravelled parts of the public highway as soon as possible during the first available planting season or such later date as may be authorized by the Municipal Engineer, and shall maintain the seed and ensure appropriate growth, including re-seeding as necessary, until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued.

Intentionally Deleted.

Civic Addressing

The Chief Building Official shall allocate all civic addresses for use within the

Plan of Subdivision. To obtain civic addresses, the Owner shall furnish the Chief Building Official with a copy of the registered Plan upon which the Chief Building Official shall designate the proper civic address for each lot. The Owner agrees that it shall obtain civic addresses for each Lot prior to applying for any building permit for any structure on the Lot. 4

Page 65 of 192

The Owner shall advise each purchaser of a subdivision lot of its correct house number.

Public Utilities 18.

Any on site utility lines to dwellings lines shall be installed underground unless

otherwise specified.

Erosion and Sediment Control During Construction 19.

Erosion control measures shall be incorporated into the construction plans and

specifications in order to control the quality of storm runoff from the Plan during construction. These measures may include: (a)

The installation of silt fences wherever there is a possibility of runoff from the

construction site onto adjacent streets, wetlands and waterbodies or properties; (b)

The installation of straw bale barriers wherever there is a possibility of runoff from the

construction site into the municipal storm water system; (c)

Fencing the work area to maintain construction activities within the predefined areas;

and (d)

Locating stockpiles of excavated material or granulars so as to minimize the possibility

of runoff beyond the construction zone, and/or containing stockpiles within silt fences.

The erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to construction and

maintained and monitored by the contractor during construction and until a good growth of vegetation is obtained on all grassed areas and until the new hard surfaced areas are constructed and the site works are completed.

All areas disturbed by construction are to be reinstated as soon as possible. UTILITY APPROVALS AND COSTS

Intentionally Deleted.

The Owner shall bear the expense of all offsite work attributable to the Subdivision

resulting from the approved public works design.

DRILLING AND BLASTING

Intentionally Deleted.

USE AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADS

The Owner shall, as and where required by the Municipal Engineer, maintain 5

Page 66 of 192

the adjacent municipal Road to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer to ensure that the construction within the Plan does not negatively impact the Road. For greater certainty, such maintenance and repair shall include the placing of dust palliatives, the control of erosion and sedimentation runoff, and the removal of mud and other materials carried out onto paved streets, and the repair of any damage caused.

If the Roads are not maintained to the

Municipality’s satisfaction, the Municipality may take the necessary action to rectify the problem at the Owner’s expense.

The Owner shall not restrict and shall ensure that no person working in the

Subdivision restricts the normal flow of traffic outside the Subdivision without the prior written consent of the Municipality.

REPAIR AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING SERVICES

The Owner shall repair any damage caused by the Owner to any existing road,

structure, services or works owned or operated by the Municipality and shall pay for all costs related to the relocation of any existing utilities or services in or outside the Subdivision as may be necessary to accommodate the Subdivision.

DRAINAGE

The drainage of surface water on the lots and blocks in the Plan is the sole

responsibility of the Owner and all subsequent purchasers, who shall provide and maintain adequate drainage of surface water and shall comply with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans as set out in Schedule “F”.

The Lot Grading and Drainage Plans may be amended from time to time on

conditions approved by the Municipal Engineer, such amendments not to take effect until executed by the Owner and Municipality and registered against title to the lands affected.

The Owner shall construct all Works in accordance with the Lot Grading and

Drainage Plans and specifications set-out in Schedule “F”, and Municipal Specifications, and the Owner shall maintain sufficient interim drainage and outlets to provide adequate drainage including the installation and removal of culverts when required by the Municipal Engineer, until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued.

The Owner agrees that if the drainage works result in drainage or a change of

drainage through private third party lands, all work shall be carried out with the approval of and to the satisfaction of the private owners affected and the Municipal Engineer. Any easements acquired by the Owner over third party lands for that purpose shall be conveyed to the Municipality.

The Owner shall not interfere with any drain or waterbody except in accordance

with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans or with the prior written permission of the Municipal 6

Page 67 of 192

Engineer, but any interference shall not relieve the Owner of responsibility for any damage caused by the interference and the Owner shall indemnify the Municipality against any claims against the Municipality relating to the damage.

All contracts of sale by the Owner of any lot within the Subdivision shall contain

the following provision, which shall be incorporated in all deeds from the Owner so that it shall be a covenant running with the land for the benefit of the remaining land in the Subdivision:

“The Transferees, for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, covenant and agree that they will not alter the slope of the lands described herein nor interfere with any drains established on the lands, except in accordance with the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plans, without the written consent of the Municipality and further that the Transferee will maintain any such alterations approved by the Municipality. This covenant is for the benefit of all other lands in the Subdivision and shall run with the title to these lands.”

CONSTRUCTION REFUSE AND FILL

The Owner shall promptly dispose of all construction refuse and debris within

the Subdivision according to the waste disposal and recycling by-laws of the Municipality in effect from time to time. If refuse is not removed within forty-eight (48) hours’ notice from the Municipality, the Municipality may remove the refuse and debris at the expense of the Owner.

The Owner shall neither deposit nor permit to be deposited surplus fill on

public lands. Furthermore the Owner shall neither remove nor permit to be removed, any fill, top soil, trees or shrubs from public lands without the written consent of the Municipal Engineer.

COMMENCEMENT, PROGRESS AND COMPLETION OF WORK

Intentionally Deleted.

If, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer, the Owner is not prosecuting or

causing to be prosecuted the work required by this agreement within the specified time, or so that it may be completed within the specified time, or is improperly performing the work, or should the Owner neglect or abandon any of the work before its completion, or unreasonably delay the work so that the conditions of this agreement are being violated or carelessly executed, or in bad faith, or should the Owner neglect or fail to renew or again perform work as may be rejected by the Municipal Engineer as being or having become defective or unsuitable, or should the Owner fail to carry out any maintenance required by this agreement, 7

Page 68 of 192

or should the Owner make, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer, default in any manner in the performance of any of the terms of this agreement, then the Municipal Engineer shall, unless prevented by urgent circumstances, notify the Owner in writing of the default, failure, delay or neglect, and if such notification is without effect for seven (7) clear days after the notice, then the Municipal Engineer shall have full authority and power to immediately purchase any materials and to employ any tools, machinery and workmen as in his opinion shall be required for the proper completion of the work at the cost and expense of the Owner together with a management fee of twenty per cent (20%) of the labour and material value.

Any entry upon the Lands by the Municipality or its agents shall not be

construed for any purpose whatsoever as an acceptance or assumption of the Works by the Municipality.

INSPECTION AND TESTING OF WORKS

Prior to the approval of a final lot grading certificate for a lot or block in the

Plan of Subdivision, the Municipal Engineer may enter onto the lot or block and inspect the Works and the lot grading of the lot or block at such times and with such duration and frequency as the Municipal Engineer considers advisable to ensure that the Works and the lot grading are being constructed and maintained in accordance with this agreement. If during inspections or testing the Municipal Engineer perceives that construction or maintenance, whether by method or otherwise, constitutes a potential danger to life or property, or construction maintenance does not conform to acceptable practice in order to meet Municipal Specifications, the Municipal Engineer shall have the authority to order stop work by verbal notice to the contractor and/or the Owner’s consulting engineer, such notice to be confirmed in writing as soon as possible thereafter, and to order such remedial action as the Municipal Engineer considers advisable. Neither the Municipality nor the Municipal Engineer shall be liable for any damages resulting from a stop work order. The Owner shall deliver a copy of this clause to each and every contractor engaged in construction of the Works.

Any work not examined to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer prior to

backfilling shall be excavated at the Owner’s cost.

EMERGENCY REPAIRS

Intentionally Deleted.

USE OF WORKS BY MUNICIPALITY

Intentionally Deleted.

ASSUMPTION OF WORKS 8

Page 69 of 192

Intentionally Deleted. WARRANTY OF WORKS

Intentionally Deleted.

FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORKS

Intentionally Deleted.

REPLACEMENT OF SURVEY BARS

Intentionally Deleted.

ENGINEERING SERVICES

The Owner shall employ an engineer (hereinafter “Owner’s Engineer) licensed

and in good standing with the Professional Engineers of Ontario to supervise all engineering functions including but not limited to:

(a)

to (h) Intentionally Deleted

(b)

prepare lot grading and drainage plans for the subdivision, referenced in Schedule J (2).

The Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of any Environmental Impact

Assessment and/or Geotechnical Study required by the Municipality and certified by a professional engineer, to the satisfaction of the Municipality.

The Owner shall furnish all plans, specifications, designs, calculations, contours, or other

information pertaining to the Works as the Municipal Engineer may require. No contract shall be awarded and no Works shall commence or be continued without the prior written approval of the design and supervision of the Works by the Municipal Engineer.

All inspections of the Works shall be performed by the Municipal Engineer

whose determination of whether the Works have been constructed according to Municipal Specifications shall be final. MATERIALS TESTING

Intentionally Deleted.

ZONING AND BUILDING RESTRICTIONS 9

Page 70 of 192

Nothing in this agreement shall relieve the Owner of any obligation to comply

with all applicable zoning and building by-laws in effect from time to time.

All construction within the subdivision shall be carried out in accordance with

any noise by-law of the Municipality that may be in effect from time to time.

The Owner agrees to display in a conspicuous place in all sales offices

established for the sale of buildings or lands within the Subdivision all of the following:

(a)

A zoning map or schedule displaying current zoning for all land in and adjacent to the

Subdivision. (b)

A print of the registered Plan of Subdivision with the following information clearly

labelled on it:

(c)

(i)

the permitted uses for all lots on the plan;

(ii)

Intentionally Deleted;

(iii)

Intentionally Deleted;

A print of the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plans; and

(d) Location of waterbodies and wetlands on the lots.

The Owner shall also ensure that the foregoing information concerning

permitted and proposed uses is communicated to all prospective purchasers by:

(a)

posting signs of a size and type satisfactory to the Municipality on the lands in the Plan;

and (b)

providing this information in writing to all prospective purchasers.

If a builder other than the Owner intends to construct and sell buildings on lots within the Plan, the Owner shall take such action as is necessary to ensure the foregoing requirements are met.

REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMITS

No building permit shall be issued for a lot or block within the Subdivision

until: (a)

Intentionally Deleted;

(b)

any swale shown on the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans in Schedule “F” which, in the

opinion of the Municipal Engineer should be constructed prior to the issue of a building permit, has been constructed; (c)

A proposed lot grading plan for the lot or block prepared by the Owner’s engineer shall

be submitted for review and approval by the Municipal Engineer. The lot grading plan for the Lot or Block shall illustrate the following: (i)

all proposed buildings and structures and their elevations;

(ii)

existing and proposed final grades; 10

Page 71 of 192

(d)

(iii)

location of the driveway;

(iv)

natural features and vegetation, existing and removed; and

(v)

the method of disposing of stormwater.

a non-interest bearing refundable deposit of three thousand dollars ($3,000) cash or

other suitable security has been posted with the Municipality for the lot or block for which a permit has been applied to ensure the following: (i) the cost to repair any damage done to the Works by the applicant, its contractors, employees or workmen, including road cleaning;.

Refund of Lot Grading Securities Lot grading refunds shall not be issued for a lot or block within the Subdivision until: (i) delivery to the Municipality of a lot grading certificate in the form prescribed by the Municipality and signed by the Owner’s Engineer on which is indicated: (1)

the civic address and lot and plan number to which the certificate applies;

(2)

the designed grades and elevations prescribed by the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans for the lot or block corners and the building line;

(3)

the actual grades and elevations for the lot or block corners and the building corners;

(4)

a statement that the final lot grading has been completed in compliance with the grading plan approved by the municipal engineer OR the final lot grading has been completed in deviation from the approved plan but due to sound engineering principals the deviation generally conforms to the grading plan, does not affect other properties and does not interfere with the overall grading plan of the subdivision;

(5)

arrows showing the direction of overland drainage flow; and

(6)

a certificate stamped by the Owner’s Engineer confirming the grading generally conforms to the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plan.

(b)

all lot levies, development charges, water and sewer rates and other charges

attributable to the lot or block have been paid in full; and (c)

all other normal requirements of the Municipality prescribed by the Ontario Building

Code Act have been complied with.

If the Municipal Engineer rejects a lot grading certificate, the cost for any further review

of it shall be deducted from the deposit.

If any repairs for damage to the Works, other than emergency repairs that shall be

carried out immediately, are not carried out within seven (7) days of written notice to the permit applicant and registered owner of the land, the Municipality may without further notice, take such action as it deems necessary to carry out the repairs, complete the work or remedy any defective work, and the permit applicant and registered owner of the land shall be 11

Page 72 of 192

jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the Municipality, which the Municipality may deduct from the deposit in addition to any other remedies available to it, including adding such costs to the tax roll of the land and collecting them in like manner as municipal taxes in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended.

If any yards remain unseeded or ungraded, or if a lot grading certificate has not been

delivered twelve (12) months from the date on which the occupancy permit was issued, the Municipality may, on at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the applicant and the registered owner of the lot or block take such action as it deems necessary to complete the work or remedy any defective work, and the applicant and registered owner of the land shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the Municipality which the Municipality may, in addition to any other remedies available to it, deduct all or a portion of said costs from the grading deposit provided. The Municipality shall, upon being satisfied that the lot grading certificate has been issued, release any security being held on account of the said lot.

The Owner agrees not to apply for a building permit until all of its obligations related

thereto contained in this Agreement are fulfilled. The Owner further agrees that it shall not undertake any grading that does not comply with the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plan and any lot grading plan submitted in support of a building permit as required by this Agreement.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

In addition to all other provisions of this agreement, the Owner shall also

comply with those special conditions related to development of the Subdivision set out in Schedule “J” attached hereto.

CONVEYANCE OF PARKLANDS OR CASH IN LIEU

The Owner shall grant to the Municipality lands in fee simple free of liens and

encumbrances for municipal park or other recreational purposes other than roads or shall make a cash payment in lieu thereof as provided by the Planning Act in accordance with Schedule “G”.

GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND OTHER PUBLIC LANDS

The Owner shall obtain and grant to the Municipality and any other required

public authority or utility company, those lands, easements, and 0.3 metre wide reserves described in Schedule “H” as may be required for utility, drainage or access purposes, free of all charges and encumbrances. The executed deeds for the lands and grants of easement together with any reference plans of survey necessary to describe them with the registered number of the plans left blank for later completion, shall be delivered to and approved by the Municipality before the Municipality requests final approval of the Plan by the Municipality.

Page 73 of 192

RESTRICTION ON TRANSFERS

The Owner shall not transfer title to any lots or blocks within the Plan until after

this agreement, all deeds, grants of easement and 0.3 metre reserves in favour of the Municipality and any other applicable public authority and utility company, and related reference plans of survey have been registered.

OWNERS’ LIABILITIES AND INDEMNITY

The Owner shall indemnify the Municipality against all actions, causes of action,

suits, claims and demands whatsoever which may arise from the actions of the Owner and not caused by the negligent acts of the Municipality, its employees, servants and agents.

OWNER’S EXPENSE

It is the intent of this Agreement that the Municipality shall not incur any

expense for the development of the Subdivision and every obligation of the Owner under this agreement shall be deemed to include the words “at the expense of the Owner”, unless specifically stated otherwise.

MUNICIPALITY’S LEGAL, PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS

The Owner agrees to pay the legal, engineering, landscape architectural,

planning and administrative costs incurred by the Municipality to process the Plan including but not limited to the preparation of this agreement and all plans and specifications, and the supervision and inspection of the Works and the Municipality shall provide copies of any invoices for such costs.

PAYMENT OF ACCOUNTS

All invoices, costs and expenses received or incurred by the Municipality and

payable by the Owner shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the Municipality’s invoice or demand for payment to the Owner, failing which the Owner shall be in default under this agreement and shall continue in default until payment plus all accrued interest is made in full.

Interest shall be paid by the Owner on all overdue amounts at the same rate

per annum and calculated in the same manner as the Municipality charges on overdue municipal taxes and any payments received shall be applied first on account of accumulated interest and then on the outstanding amount.

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

The Owner agrees to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise, of the

Township concerning the provision of municipal services including fencing, lighting, 13

Page 74 of 192

landscaping, sidewalks, roads, installation of services, signage, and provision of drainage.

Intentionally Deleted .

RELEASE OF SECURITIES

The Owner may, when not in default, apply to the Municipality as construction

of the Works proceeds, for releases of its security at regular intervals, and each application shall include an up-to-date estimate of the cost to complete the Works verified by the Owner’s engineer and the Municipal Engineer.

Upon receipt of an application, the Municipal Engineer may authorize the

release of such portion of the security as the Municipal Engineer may, in all of the circumstances consider reasonable, but without limiting its generality, the following rules shall apply:

The amount of the security retained by the Municipality excluding any amounts

held for warranty or Construction Lien Act purposes, shall not, at any time, be less than the up-to-date estimated cost to complete the Works.

The Municipality shall deduct the following amounts from the security otherwise

available for release:

(a)

ten percent (10%) of the value of the work performed since the date of the last release as determined by the Municipal Engineer, which the Municipality shall hold pursuant to Part IV of the Construction Lien Act;

(b)

an amount sufficient to satisfy any construction liens of which the Municipality has notice in respect of any portion of the Works located on a public street or highway, or on any lands conveyed to the Municipality or any other public authority; and

(c)

ten percent (10%) of the value of the Work, which the Municipality shall hold as security for the Owner’s obligations during the Warranty Period.

INSURANCE

Intentionally Deleted.

Page 75 of 192

CONSTRUCTION LIENS

The Owner shall hold back from its payment to any persons who may supply

services or materials in connection with the construction or maintenance of the Works, all amounts required by the Construction Lien Act, and shall indemnify the Municipality against any claims, actions or demands in connection with the Works and all costs reasonably incurred by the Municipality as a result thereof.

If any lien is claimed pursuant to the Construction Lien Act for the supply of

services or material in connection with the construction or maintenance of any portion of the Works located on a public street or highway or any lands owned by the Municipality or any other public authority, the Owner shall be considered in default under this agreement and shall continue to be in default until all liens are discharged, and the Municipality may, in its absolute discretion, use the security deposited by the Owner to pay into court any amounts required to discharge all liens plus costs.

Intentionally Deleted.

DEFAULT PROVISIONS

Whenever the Owner is deemed by the terms of this agreement to be in

default, the Municipality will make best efforts, unless prevented by urgent circumstances, to give the Owner notice of the default including a brief description of the remedial action required and the date by which such remedial action shall be completed.

If the Owner fails or refuses to remedy the default within the time prescribed in

the notice, the Municipality shall have the right in addition to any other remedies available to it and without further notice to the Owner to use any security held by it to remedy the default and recover all costs and damages incurred by and all amounts owing to the Municipality.

REGISTRATION

The Owner consents to the registration of this agreement by the Municipality

against the title to the Lands.

The Municipality shall register this agreement and any deeds or grants of

easement or rights-of-way in favour of the Municipality without undue delay after registration of the Plan.

NOTICE TO SUBSEQUENT OWNERS AND PURCHASERS

In accordance with s. 51(26) of the Planning Act, all of the terms and conditions

of this agreement may be enforced against the Owner and any and all subsequent owners of any lot, block or part thereof in the Plan. 15

Page 76 of 192

In addition, each and every subsequent owner of the Lands or a part thereof

acknowledges notice of all of the provisions of this agreement and, in particular, those provisions set out in Schedule “K”.

ARBITRATION

Any dispute between the parties with respect to this agreement shall, at the

request of a party, be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Act, and the decision of the arbitrator or, if more than one, the decision of a majority shall be final and binding on the parties.

Each party shall pay its own costs of the arbitration and shall share equally the

costs of the arbitrator(s). CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT

If the Plan of Subdivision is not registered within one (1) year from the date of

this agreement, the Municipality may, at its option, declare this agreement to be null and void.

TIME OF THE ESSENCE

Time shall be of the essence of this agreement.

LEGAL NOTICE TO OWNER

Any notice required to be given by the parties to this agreement shall be given

by registered mail at the address for service of the parties on the title page of this agreement, or at such other addresses as the parties may specify from time to time, (provided that in the event of a postal disruption, notice shall only be given by hand) and shall be deemed to have been delivered on the third day after the date of deposit in the post office.

FURTHER ASSURANCES

The parties shall, upon reasonable request of the other, execute any further documents

as may be required for the more perfect and absolute performance of the terms and conditions of this agreement. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS

This agreement shall be binding upon and ensure to the benefit of the parties hereto

and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement as at the date first set out above. 16

Page 77 of 192

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Per:

Ronald Vandewal, Mayor

Angela Maddocks, Clerk We have the authority to bind the corporation

PITTSBURGH BUILDING & ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. Per:

Sean Marshall I have the authority to bind the corporation

Page 78 of 192

SCHEDULE “A” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF LANDS

Part of Lots 14 and 15, Concession 8, Geographic Township of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac, described as Lots 1 – 5 inclusive and Blocks 6 & 7 on Plan 13M- ____.

Page 79 of 192

SCHEDULE “B” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT COST OF WORKS N/A

Page 80 of 192

SCHEDULE “C” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT The subdivision shall be developed in one phase.

Page 81 of 192

SCHEDULE “D” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT TIME SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS

Construction of the Subdivision shall commence forthwith upon registration of the Plan.

Page 82 of 192

SCHEDULE “E” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT APPROVED PLANS FOR WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED

THE ORIGINAL PLANS LISTED IN THIS SCHEDULE AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOW ON FILE IN THE MUNICIPAL OFFICES AND SHALL GOVERN IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISPUTE.

General and Servicing Plan, Trail View Estates, Drawing Number G1, January 30, 2018 prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc.
General and Servicing Plan, Trail View Estates, Drawing Number G2, January 30, 2018 prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc.

Page 83 of 192

SCHEDULE “F” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT LOT GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS

SEE PLAN REFERENCED IN SCHEDULE “J (2)”

Page 84 of 192

SCHEDULE “G” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT LANDS TO BE CONVEYED FOR PARKLAND OR CASH IN LIEU The Owner shall provide to the Municipality cash in lieu of parkland conveyance in the amount of $5,750.00.

Page 85 of 192

SCHEDULE “H” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT CONVEYANCES, GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS

The Owner shall convey to the Municipality in fee simple, free of all encumbrances and free of contamination, Blocks 6 and 7 on Plan 13M- ____ for purposes of a 0.3m reserve.

Page 86 of 192

SCHEDULE “I” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT PARKLAND, FENCING, LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS

N/A

Page 87 of 192

SCHEDULE “J” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

The Owner agrees to implement the recommendations included the Stormwater Management Brief prepared by Jocelyn Engineering Inc., dated July 31, 2017 (updated August 01, 2017). The general and servicing plan shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement without the need for further amendment to the Agreement.

The Owner shall prepare a lot grading and drainage plan as well as a sediment and erosion control plan. These plans shall be submitted to the Municipality. Once these plan is approved by the Municipal Engineer, the plans shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement without the need for further amendment to the Agreement. The Owner agrees to implement the approved plans.

AGREEMENTS OF PURCHASE AND SALE 3.

The Owner shall include in each Agreement for the purchase and sale of any of the lands in the Plan of Subdivision that the purchaser of any lot or Block will be bound by the following provisions which shall, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, also form part of this Agreement: a.

that the owner of any Lot shall comply with the General and Servicing plan showing the location of the house, well and the 500 m² envelope for the sewage system location;

b. that the owner of any Lot shall reserve and maintain the primary and alternate locations for sewage systems as identified in Drawing No. 6 in the Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analysis report prepared by ASC Environmental Inc. dated August 31, 2016, as updated by letter dated September 7, 2017. No construction of wells, homes, driveways, pools, garages or any other structure shall take place in the primary or alternative area identified; c.

that the owner of any Lot acknowledges and agrees that if the sewage system for the Lot is required to be raised, that sewage pumps may be required;

d. that the owner of any Lot acknowledges and agrees that deviations from locations on the site servicing plan identified in Drawing No. 6 in the Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analysis report prepared by ASC Environmental Inc. with respect to sewage system location may require the submission of an engineering report/design and terrain analysis supporting any proposed changes, including any potential impact on adjoining properties; e.

that the owner of any Lot agrees to comply with all requirements and recommendations specified in in Drawing No. 6 in the Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analysis report prepared by ASC Environmental Inc. dated August 31, 2016, as updated by letter dated September 7, 2017 and all 27

Page 88 of 192

associated drawings.

SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS / WELLS 4.

All on-site sewage disposal systems shall be installed in accordance with all applicable law and in accordance with any permits issued by KFL&A Public Health.

The Owner agrees that any existing wells and/or septic systems present on the Plan that are not to be used as part of the Plan of Subdivision shall be decommissioned in accordance with all applicable laws.

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES 6.

Prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Owner must confirm that sufficient wire line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide those services to the proposed development.

The Owner is advised that if that infrastructure is not available, the Owner may be required

pay

for

the

connection

and/or

extension

the

existing

communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Owner elects not to do so, the Owner

shall

demonstrate

communication/telecommunication

the

Municipality

facilities

are

that

available

sufficient

alternative

within

proposed

the

development to enable the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services such as 911 Emergency Services, at a minimum. 8.

The Owner agrees to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that said easements may be subject to final servicing decisions.

The Owner agrees to enter into any and all servicing agreements (Letter of Understanding) as required to service the lands within this Plan, with Bell Canada or another utility service provider, to comply with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the Municipality and if no such conditions are imposed, the Owner shall advise the Municipality of the arrangements made for such servicing. Executed copies of all servicing agreements shall be provided to the Municipality prior to Final Approval of the Plan.

POSTAL SERVICE 10. The Owner agrees that a Canada Post Community Mailbox shall be located at a location on the road allowance beside Lot 1 on McFadden Road to the satisfaction of the Municipality and in accordance with any additional requirements of Canada Post, and to the satisfaction of Canada Post.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS 11. In the event that deeply buried or previously undiscovered archaeological deposits are discovered in the course of development or site alteration, all work must immediately cease and the site must be secured. The Cultural Program Branch of the Ministry of 28

Page 89 of 192

Culture (416-314-7123) must be immediately contacted. The Algonquins of Ontario must also be contacted where remains or artifacts of aboriginal origins are discovered. The Algonquins of Ontario may be contacted at: 31 Riverside Drive, Suite 101, Pembroke, Ontario K8A 8R6, (613) 735-3759 – algonquins@nrtco.net. 12. In the event that human remains are encountered during construction, all work must immediately cease and the site must be secured. The Ontario Provincial Police, the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Regulation Unit of the Ontario Ministry of Consumer Services (416-326-8404), and the Cultural Program Branch of the Ministry of Culture must be immediately contacted. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 13. The Owner agrees that prior to obtaining any building permit for any Lot that an entrance permit shall be obtained from the Municipality, including the requirement for any culvert. The Owner further agrees to comply with any permit issued and to construct to the satisfaction of the Municipality any required entrances. 14. The Owner agrees to comply with the recommendations of the environmental impact study entitled, Environmental Impact Study, Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc. Plan of Subdivision, 5550 McFadden Road, prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. March 2017, to the satisfaction of the Municipality and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 15. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that development is prohibited within 15 m of the two westernmost wetlands identified on the property in Figure 1 of the Environmental Impact Study, Pittsburgh Building & Energy Systems Inc. Plan of Subdivision, 5550 McFadden Road, prepared by Niblett Environmental Associates Inc. March 2017. The area within 15 m of the two identified wetland areas will be maintained as a no-cut buffer, within which there shall be no disturbance of the soil mantle or vegetation cover. 16. The Owner further acknowledges and agrees that development within 30m from any wetland or water body not identified in condition 19 above shall not be permitted and that the area within 30 m of any wetland or water body shall not be disturbed, shall be left in a natural state as of the date of draft plan approval and where possible such areas shall be restored to a natural condition. 17. The Owner agrees to relocate the existing Hydro pole located in front of Lot 5 currently within the road allowance to a location along the lot line between the development and the road allowance that shall be consistent with other Hydro pole locations, at the sole cost of the Owner. 18. The Owner agrees to install and provide power to streetlights at the request of the Municipality and in accordance with any design criteria and guidelines imposed by the Municipality, to its satisfaction.

Page 90 of 192

SCHEDULE “K” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT NOTICE TO SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS Each owner and subsequent owner of any lot, block or part thereof against the title of which this agreement has been registered is hereby given notice that the following clauses in the agreement to which this schedule forms a part may contain provisions and impose obligations that may affect the individual’s ownership and use of such lot, block or part thereof. Item

Brief Description

Drainage

All grading and landscaping of lots must be carried out strictly in accordance with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans.

Construction Refuse and Fill

The Owner shall remove all construction refuse from the job site at its own expense and dispose of it in accordance with the municipal by-laws. No fill shall be deposited on or removed from public lands without the consent of the Municipal Engineer.

Inspection of Works

The Municipal Engineer has the authority to enter onto the property for the purpose of inspecting the Works and lot grading and may order stop work by verbal notice to any person where it is perceived that any construction constitutes a potential danger to life or property or is otherwise in contravention of the Subdivision Agreement.

Zoning and Building Restrictions

All construction shall comply with all applicable by-laws including the zoning, building and noise by-laws. The Owner and all builders must communicate information about proposed land uses in the subdivision to all prospective purchasers

Requirements for Building Permits

No building permits shall be issued until all of the requirements specified have been complied with including payment of a refundable deposit.

Special Conditions

Land in the subdivision shall be subject to the Special Conditions set out in Schedule “J”.

Easements

Schedule “H” sets out a list of those lots that will be subject to public and utility easements and reserves.

Human remains

All owners are advised that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction, that all work shall immediately stop and the appropriate authorities shall be contacted in accordance with conditions 22 and 23 in Schedule “J”

Page 91 of 192

Page 92 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE: REPORT DATE:

April 2, 2019 March 26, 2019

SUBJECT:

Stephanie Baxter Medical Corporation/Peck Purchase of Road Allowance, Lele Lane

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council pass By-law 2019-23 to repeal by-law 2018-80 and to stop up, close and transfer ownership of an unopened road allowance that forms the boundary between Lot 1, Concessions X and XI in Bedford District and Lot 24, Concession XIV (Part 1, RP 13R21915, save and except Part 4, 13R8858) in Loughborough District. BACKGROUND: At the December 18, 2018 meeting, Council passed By-law 2018-80 stopping up, closing and transferring to Stephanie Baxter Medical Corporation Parts 1, 2 & 3, RP 13R21915, subject to a right-of-way over Part 4, RP 13R8858. The purpose of preparing the description with the inclusion of a right-of-way over Part 4, RP 13R8858 was to provide properties to the north of this road allowance legal deeded access over the portion of the road allowance known as Lele Lane over the portion of the road allowance that the Township transferred to Baxter/Peck. When By-law 2018-80 was reviewed by the Township solicitor, it was determined that there were eight properties upon which rights-of-way would need to be registered over the traveled portion of Lele Lane that By-law 2018-80 proposes to transfer to Baxter/Peck. Registration of a right-of-way on title of eight properties is a significant time and expense. In order to avoid the need for creating rights-of-way in favour of other property owners who may be using the portion of Lele lane that crosses the Road Allowance between Loughborough and Bedford for access to properties to the north, the Township solicitor recommends the Township retain ownership of the traveled portions of Lele Lane (Pts 2 & 3, RP 13R21915, and Pt 4, RP 13R8858). As such it is recommended that Council repeal By-law 2018-80 and pass a by-law with the following description: Part of the Road Allowance between the Geographic Townships of Bedford and Loughborough, being Part 1, Plan 13R-21915, save & except Part 4, 13R-8858, now in the Township of South Frontenac The attached By-law 2019-23 has been drafted to repeal By-law 2018-80 and includes the above property description. The above proposed solution has been discussed with Mr. Peck, acting as agent for Ms. Baxter, and is agreeable to the Township retaining ownership of the portions of the road allowance with the travelled portions of Lele Lane, rather than going through the legal expense of registering a right-of-way on the title of multiple properties. FINANCIAL: Based on the land area that the Township will retain (Pts 2 & 3, 13R-21915, and Pt 4, 13R-8858), the Township shall refund Baxter/Peck $1,930.10 (9,190 sq.ft. x $0.21). The Township holds a deposit of $3000 to cover legal expenses associated with this transfer. Our strength is our community.

Page 93 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: By-law 2019-23 By-law to Stop Up and Close a Portion of a Road Allowance Attachment 2: December 18, 2018 Report to Council for Peck-Baxter Road Closing Attachment 3: Location of Property to be Enlarged by Road Allowance Attachment 4: Location Map of Road Allowance Attachment 5: Reference Plan 13R21915 Attachment 6: Reference Plan 13R8858 Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer Prepared by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services

Our strength is our community.

Page 94 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Our strength is our community.

Page 95 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE:

December 18, 2018

REPORT DATE:

December 12, 2018

SUBJECT:

Road Closure and Transfer: Peck & Baxter

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council pass By-law 2018-80 to stop up, close and transfer ownership of an unopened road allowance that forms the boundary between Lot 1, Concessions X and XI in Bedford District and Lot 24, Concession XIV (Parts 1, 2 & 3, RP 13R21915) in Loughborough District, subject to a right-of-way over Part 4, RP 13R8858. BACKGROUND: A property-owner, Jeff Peck and Stephanie Baxter, has made application to purchase a portion of the unopened road allowance that runs east-west along the north side of the property near Frontenac Park. Attachment #1 shows the location of the property proposed to be enlarged by the road allowance. Attachment #2 shows and aerial photo of the road allowance relative to the Peck/Baxter property and Frontenac Park. The road allowance is aligned east to west on a peninsula of land which lies between Big Clear Lake and Milk Lake. From shore to shore the road allowance measures 251 metres and is 5,020 square meters (1.2 acres) in total area. The land is mostly scrub brush land with some mature forest cover and it is extremely steep near both shorelines. The applicant’s property and another private parcel form the south boundary of the road allowance and the Frontenac Provincial Park forms the north boundary. A private lane (Lele Lane) crosses the road allowance. Given that the road allowance leads from shore to shore and is only accessed by a private land and private land, it appears that it would not be used as a public road in the future. Attachment #3 shows the portions of the unopened road allowance proposed to be closed and transferred to the Peck/Baxter property (Parts 1-3, RP 13R21915). The request was brought to Committee of the Whole on February 13, 218, but this portion of the road allowance was the subject of a proposal under the new Frontenac Provincial Park Management Plan to regulate all Township-owned road allowances that abut the Park so Council chose to defer a decision to close the portion of the road allowance. Negotiations regarding the Parks regulation of Township-owned road allowances were ongoing throughout 2018. A further report was taken to Council at the April 17, 2018 meeting. Correspondence dated April 9, 2018 from Ontario Park confirmed they had no objection to the closure and sale of the unopened road allowance as it improves the situation from the Park’s perspective. Further correspondence from Angela Adkinson of Ontario Parks, dated May 25, 2018, noted that they have no objection to the closure and conveyance of the entire section of the road allowance provided a right-of-way is registered to accommodate Lele Lane crossing the unopened road allowance (Part 4 on RP 13R8858 – see Attachment #4). At the April 17, 2018 meeting, Council provided direction to waive the requirements under the Township of South Frontenac’s Notice By-law No. 2016-73, and Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac exempted the advertising of the proposal to close the said road allowance. Our strength is our community.

Page 96 of 192

REPORT TO COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT By-law 2018-80 has been drafted to effect the closure and transfer of portions of the road allowance described as Parts 1-3 of RP 13R21915 and to register the right-ofway over Part 4, RP 13R8858. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: The Township will receive $50,550.82 from the transfer and sale of the unopened road allowance. The purchaser has paid a deposit of $3000 to cover the costs incurred by the Township to stop up, close and transfer the portion of the road allowance. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Location of Property to be Enlarged by Road Allowance Attachment 2 - Location Map of Road Allowance Attachment 3 - Reference Plan 13R21915 Attachment 4 - Reference Plan 13R8858

Prepared by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO/Deputy-Clerk

Our strength is our community.

Page 97 of 192

Attachment #1

]

‘,: % q

l ‘%

} %

1 11

‘S, 1

‘%€

(

‘gl

}

‘?1

d# ]

’l

1 /

{

‘S,

ma k i im

A %sh?

.al’

J%’;#ltT?

s ’l

-W

€’

! O

Ji wl o

‘<

< o

j F.

*.l

’l

‘,.

’l

21 (l

‘,.

‘%

‘?‘h $ffi s

l!I

X’

)

‘4’j v.

‘!l %

’l

‘!!

j L

‘%

‘% r

(

‘Q

;’% ‘(

‘:

‘ffi

i?i ‘Q

’l wa

‘%

‘. ,a’C’/‘i’ % “!

‘X

% i

?d x*

7 ‘%1

Jl{ l

i t

(

‘1’ Ll

k w

7 ! W r

(

‘!

“,,,

;’%’l

’l k

70 02’% CS

Page 98 of 192

‘?W

!,;-

PTLH ACT.

UhlhmR THm

RXQUIRRTHISPlANTO

cgocnapc rowrrsuzps oy nxnyonn arui rioucnnonoucu ‘o nn W L smnrnx a

T(fiNSH(P of SOUTH FRONTENAC COU]tTYo/FRONTENAC N B(:MJwl:500 slwnamxa tO :lD 10 @ IhWrw HDP]mf8 L4Mn arJRnYOR8 N(:.

I LNa:’-’::,:. J

[;

’ …,.. 0 “E” ..:a’ ‘Z,,y c-, shd.iy’HPART F’SHIP L”’ Ah LOT 13R-15878 Qi " CEOCRAPHIC TOT4/’ NI.. o 9? BEDFORD LOT7,-=.. %? ha,p;7t ’ N6a ?’ ima*‘ri /ffli& Q re’a,q,g .h, 7 JllHSal49-0591

v 2;, % ,,,,, ’s% +

(Y)

. I’fN 86249-(1488 (LT)

ti $ 0 6

‘21

‘.:Th (2,

im.eu i - mtian

& Losbghborosbgh

..-C%t#’ ieAb%g %h%% Road sS= !]!:. AlilouancS:pntsaub-mm<tri e Retraa;,ramt. NoS’i :, air477kniA:*art[Betsueerb ma’.–rsad At .cwifPJllT4 l ;Townships wml,‘r7 al9, and-Faraof-sb.,r. -a, PT,

f Nd

PIN 8148-03Ml [LT]

a I+ m4ml … " / . ' :lDjltO

-.”’]MRal-OI??(Lrl………………,..l!’:r…………., ‘=… 98811-Oa8R(LT) " -s—-’ -’/% LOT PART 12 PLAN 13R-18873 ,r5’e -‘A

! O m

PART I PLAN 13R-14779 <..=‘z , >%byy’

:t::

i RHPllRSmMTArm rOR Tm IJIID RElllSTR4R rOR’ff’lT IJI)111 TITLEB nlVl810N O? paosrxyic (xo. is)

l l

-aota-

fiHJL . I’ffl ONTANI LJUtll SURln.)’nR

RRCEfinfil AMn DAIS/TITI)

l l

PLAN of SURVEY of PART of tha ROAD ALLCfiANCE BE’fiEEN tha

prm 18

I, 5o’E-o 4!

l Wl

(,) -6 cgocn*.r6mc.,qyf r usurp s ‘, ol houcn.sonoucu ,l( s<o(-

= - -.– — - - HCIn

IlllMlhl[’ hMt Ihh* Ill*lh

i - 4.’- - -( -%-: - l –.—ssss *ys.-

Page 99 of 192

Page 100 of 192

l?lj

F???"=K gil !!!IAlkl !uvs oiwvrhc lXl’ll ‘0 IlV%ilN

t%” 5/ ?‘o”?

" ?’%:q m’+rp) ?

‘Ial61alufllJ6 IhlN{umllllc}!}‘uh61 IHa }%aNhlluLJ

I I

‘M}i%alTh}ul }@m Illall%xflOl}

)111 !NH l? kMl!101}-4uL’ ixv 1lll ;a2Ali? ?MI Mllh

‘Illxl!Qliilv *;mNi-ii)0001 1{1 lll’li }hl {‘M!111 {IKI }

7,,

11101 kil4}}I l

110

m’llJllM30 €MOA1AMll-

?.t

l-12:l 9

}?{

r 4

“l

[l’l0l

–il

‘?IV 51llNNVM IH? )O DNINVM }AI IIIH?IM NOIGIA€el.S 111 hl’li V ?IIN Sl lll?d si+u lllall(n

(.gy?j e .11 -A -l

?,$

lo, ,ll’lll ]a ! …04040h04% %v,

.lUlll*!11’

% 4 .#I'4 #g

0000

a/ ? U’ !/ Fi

‘116% M (l u% al }%la}Hll Nl?nOll!!MlM’l

a%ll abbl’llll 111 ulu}u&61 ll}21?II !ThNlIMl’lll

l 9alllMlllll

‘g #a

1;’

‘W{X} 0% INhln{??MI

$. ‘a’l:,(l lls0 .d

/674’/‘3:rlNb’o-dI $

aHM 0111 16 llWn NMlNlnniN IML lj) %61.lZ.@y !nllll1ll%llb! M)il% Nhl }lThuM{III )lfl IkNlllnl

,l#

OiOI Hrl NV7i

i il’b’d

c,*

:.as{?

–}Vitiintl’a%nlll iilauil 011 N6v DIIW Th21a%l@

i.,,

{%,:’ ,i%wM”%yla:nuE,a!: tN,l’f.laMSo,r’A.,51aRn:16y0an=:Ili. !j})isl.oj o sg,uwN),‘ie}t(:{i€.l)sl )

-4-l

art

f%. 11 11

?jQlHVdl

N I) aNlOll

/! i’

E ! O

),-

i’

L(1

?-’

IV ‘y’ / :)

y’)’ ;tk/ C’

‘,’)

‘) .}’

C,/

-%*vx WlaThllNl]}‘10

M} I I ll’l ILM10 ?}111% Nl,{I Fll–1’*

}

(,”

lri-7

/? (,’ :-L//

m ffi

(}

I:i

% e

6861

‘S1'0 aAll:l)l ‘N ?IVH:I?W

HE)nOHOBHSnO’l

,001 =,,I =nV)S

dlHSNMOl

Q/j

DVN:IINOHJ 40 ,34:Q9p

aHOjCl3B CINV HDnO):l09HEln0’l jO SdlHSNMOl Nl3Ml:IEI

‘1

‘; ,;q -;p,5 ; ; 7 7/

3DNVMCmV CIVO):! INn NMOI jO lHVd

s ov,iy-yvi ? k0?a?00 1101010111 0

HE)nOHOgHE)n0’l j0 51lHSNMOl

01, 141+0’l+ I4+II- : l ,,,,,,,4-g,4ygi,;2

/(IX NOISS3)NO:) tyZ CINV 92 Slm j0 ffld

4 % “}

Nlll}i

AjAlln!i jO NV’ld

aHOJCl vixili Dx lx>uhvxxvi

t!l

1}!)

qiijiw=u ‘isn?l

W- 12 i (2” l Jl ?=- l

dlHSNMOl O? JI

Jl d {Iil{N ON {Xl%Ml.

!lNld 10 ’l’lll}‘111)I

March 20, 2019 9:06 AM Angela Maddocks Ontario Invests in Small and Rural Municipalities to Improve Service Delivery and Efficiency To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. Ontario Newsroo m News Release Ontario Invests in Small and Rural Municipalities to Improve Service Delivery and Efficiency March 20, 2019 Investments Will Support Communities, Respect Taxpayer Dollars INNISFIL - Ontario's government is working for the people to improve local service delivery and efficiency in the province's municipalities. Today, Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing announced a one-time investment for many of Ontario's small and rural municipalities. Some of Ontario's small and rural municipalities may have limited capacity to plan, modernize and improve the way they provide services to their communities. With this funding, municipalities can improve service delivery by finding smarter, more efficient ways to spend money that help those who need it most while respecting taxpayer dollars. "Taxpayers need their local government to deliver modern, efficient services that show respect for their hard-earned dollars. This funding will help small and rural municipalities improve how they deliver services and reduce the ongoing costs of providing those services," said Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. "I look forward to continuing to work together with our municipal partners to help people and businesses in communities across our province thrive." Ontario's government for the people was elected to restore transparency and accountability in Ontario's finances. The province undertook a line-by-line review of its own expenditures, and we have been clear that we expect our partners, including municipalities, to be taking steps to become more efficient. Examples could include service delivery reviews, development of shared services agreements, IT solutions, capital investments or other projects. Municipalities will decide how to best target funding to benefit their local communities. "This financial support from the Province will help in our ongoing efforts to make sure we operate as efficiently as possible, as we continue to deliver the much-needed services our residents have come to expect and depend on," said Lynn Dollin, Mayor of Innisfil. 1 Page 148 of 192 The funding supports Ontario's commitment to reduce the cost of government. QUICK FACTS  405 municipalities will receive funding.  The Town of Innisfil will receive close to $677,000.  To ensure investments are targeted to where they are needed most, funding will be allocated based on the number of households in a municipality and whether the municipality is urban or rural. CONTACTS Julie O’Driscoll Minister’s Office, Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 416-569-0569 julie.o’driscoll@ontario.ca Conrad Spezowka Communications, Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 416-585-7066 mma.media@ontario.ca Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing http://www.ontario.ca/municipalaffairsandhousing Questions about your subscription? Contact us. Edit your subscription preferences. Unsubscribe from News on Demand. To help protect y our priv acy , Micro so ft Office prev ented auto matic download of this pictu re from the In ternet. Follow Us On Twitter. Visit the Newsroom. Disponible en français. © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2008 - 2019 99 Wellesley Street West 4th floor, Room 4620 Toronto ON M7A 1A1 2 Page 149 of 192 The Use of Services by Rural Older Adults in South Frontenac Township REPORT FOR SOUTHERN FRONTENAC COMMUNITY SERVICES Nicole Raymer QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY | KINGSTON, ON Page 150 of 192 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Mr. Dave Townsend and Mr. Andy Mills from Southern Frontenac Community Services for their assistance in the development and implementation of this project. All findings and views expressed are those of the author and in no way represent the official views of Southern Frontenac Community Services. I extend my gratitude to Queen’s University and Dr. Mark Rosenberg for his supervision and guidance in this project. This project was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Master’s Award. i Page 151 of 192 Table of Contents Key Points ………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………..….. p. 3 Introduction ……………..……………………………………………………..……………………………………………..….. p. 4 Aims & Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. p. 5 Location ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… p. 6 Survey Results ……..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. p. 7 Community Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…. p. 9 Health Services ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 11 Library Services ……………………………………………………………………………………………………... p. 13 Physical Recreation Services ………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 15 Social Clubs and Services ……………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 17 Skills Workshops ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 19 Food Services ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 21 Transportation Services …………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 23 Housing Services ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 25 Vulnerability Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………….……. p. 27 Interview Results ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 30 Desire to Age-in-Place ……………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 30 Transportation Concerns ………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 32 Funding Issues ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 33 Key Informant Interview …………………………………………………………………………….………….. p. 33 Conclusions ..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 35 Limitations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 38 References ..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. p. 40 ii Page 152 of 192 Key Points • • • • • • • Older adults in South Frontenac utilize Health Services the most Closely followed by: o Library Services o Physical Recreation Services o Social clubs and Services Older adults desired more “active programming”, such as swimming and hiking Male interviewees suggested trade workshops such as woodworking and landscaping Most interviewees wished to remain aging in their communities Concerns around reliable transportation and cost of services were prominent among interviewees Recommendations: o Development of a Local Seniors Forum/Activity Group o Determine feasibility of a Collaborative Volunteer Driving Network for services throughout the township o Development of a Service Guide for Older Adults with information on accessing available community services 3 Page 153 of 192 Introduction Aging is one thing everyone has in common. There is no way to stall the hands of time and inevitably people grow old and may require support to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). These activities, including walking, communicating, toileting, eating and bathing are key components to maintaining quality of life, and ability to complete these ADLs begins to decline at age 65 (Statistics Canada 2011). Services that support older adults with ADLs are integral to promoting Aging at Home, the current provincial aging strategy (Ontario Seniors Secretariat 2013). These services can also help foster positive social networks that can contribute to improved mental health, assisting the older population in remaining in the community (Cobigo and Stuart 2010). With momentum for aging-in-place infrastructure mounting it is essential to understand what services and supports are needed by the older population and how these services are planned to be sure that the most vulnerable subpopulations are included in decision making processes. The Ontario government developed an Action Plan for Seniors in 2012 which mandated improved access to community services. To achieve this goal, they provided additional funded hours for personal support workers in the provincial healthcare budget but failed to outline how these hours should be allocated among the population. This left how these hours are established as the responsibility of community-level agencies that vary in policy from municipality to municipality, creating the potential for inequitable distribution of services. Especially vulnerable older adults are at particular risk of being left out of discussions surrounding healthcare and social services. Those who have low socio-economic status, are from a visual minority, indigenous, or a member of the LGBTQ community may have varying service needs in comparison to the general older adult population. With funded hours of services limited, many older adults are left with pay-for-service options that low-income individuals are unable to afford. Vulnerable older adults also exhibit greater rates of mental illness than their non-vulnerable counterparts, which should be considered when determining service needs (Fiske et al. 2009). In areas where services that can meet their needs are provided, additional circumstances such as frailty, language, and location can create additional barriers to these services that disproportionately affect vulnerable older adults. This is problematic as vulnerable older adults already face greater health risks such as higher rates of obesity, cardiovascular, and poor mental health status (Dammann & Smith 2009; Karlsen & Nazroo 2002; Kottorp et al. 2016). It is therefore integral that vulnerable adults be consulted in the planning process of services, before inequities can develop. 4 Page 154 of 192 Aims & Objectives This project aims to understand what services vulnerable older adults want in South Frontenac and how to better integrate their wants into the planning process. Current literature often addresses services needs from a homogeneous perspective, and this study hopes to contribute to understanding the intersectionality of aging. To achieve this goal, the project has been broken down into three main objectives: 1) Understand the expressed need of older adults in South Frontenac Township and what services they are currently using 2) Identify barriers to accessing services and services that older adults want but do not have 3) Examine the perspective of organizations on senior services and involvement of older adults in planning of these services To meets these objectives, the project was implemented in three stages: 1) Surveys were administered to older adults within South Frontenac Township 2) In-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of the survey participants 3) The Chief Executive Officer of Southern Frontenac Community Services was interviewed The surveys were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) programing. Comparisons were made to understand how location, age, income, and personal identity influence the use of services and expressed need. Regression analysis was used to determine the significance that age, income, mobility, and co-habitants had on expressed needs, which were determined as: 1) Isolation from the Community 2) Food Insecurity 3) Housing Insecurity Interviews were transcribed and then evaluated through thematic analysis to pull out common themes and concerns among participants. The interviews from older adult participants were then compared with the key informant interview to examine similarities and divergences between organizational and older adult desires. The survey results and interviews themes were then discussed based on the current available literature and data from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Special attention was paid to service use among South Frontenac Township when compared to reported use from the national, provincial, and health unit level. 5 Page 155 of 192 Location This project examines the rural South Frontenac Township (population of 18,000 within 970km2), located in Eastern Ontario, just north of the City of Kingston. Within the township, the average age is 44.7 years old, with over 94% of the population speaking English as their first language. Just over 30% of the population is 55 years of age or older and are therefore defined as an “older adult” by the World Health Organization and for the purposes of this study. Of these adults 55 and over, 51% are male and 49% are female. This is a change from the rest of the Canadian population, where the gender split of older adults is 54.6% female and 45.4% male. 6 Page 156 of 192 Survey Results The survey was carried out between November 2nd, 2017 and March 21st, 2018. A total of 73 questionnaires were received and analyzed using SPSS Version 24. South Frontenac Township is in eastern Ontario. The 2016 total population was 18,646. The older adult population was 3,320 or 17.8% of the total population. The median age of the population was 46.9. Almost everyone in the township lives in single-detached houses. Of the 7,185 private dwellings in the township, 6,880 are single-detached houses or almost 96% of all dwellings. The number of people who responded to the survey was 73 or almost 2.2 percent of the population 55 and over. The survey participants (n=73) were an average of 72.8 years old, with a gender ratio of 74% female and 26% male. Just over 27% of the respondents lived alone, and 19.2% reported living with a mobility impairment. Of the respondents, 65.8% were married, 2.7% were common-law, 11% were widowed, and 9.6% were divorced and 11% reported being single. The mean income reported by respondents was $54,988 per household. 87.7% of participants lived in single-detached houses, and those who did not, lived mostly in apartments (9.6%), with a few in in-law suites (2.7%). Among survey participants 89% spoke English as their first language, and most of the respondents identified as white (94.5%). About two-thirds of the respondents had received a post-secondary education, with 28.8% having attended or completed some college, and 37% holding a university degree. Respondents were categorized as living in one of eight smaller communities within South Frontenac Township; Battersea, Harrowsmith, Hartington, Inverary, Perth Road, Sunbury, Sydenham, or Verona; or three just outside of the South Frontenac Township boundary; Elginburg, Glenburnie, or Godfrey. Of all the survey participants, over a third were from Sydenham (36%), more than triple the participants from any other community. Eleven percent of participants reported living in Hartington, 9% from Battersea, and 8% lived in Harrowsmith and Inverary. Verona and Perth Road accounted for 7% each, Glenburnie at 5%, and Elginburg, Sunbury, and Godfrey each contributed 3% of responses (Figure 1). 7 Page 157 of 192 LOCATION OF REPSPONDENTS ELGINBURG 3% GLENBURNIE 5% SUNBURY 3% GODFREY 3% SYDENHAM 36% VERONA 7% PERTH RD 7% INVERARY 8% HARROWSMITH 8% BATTERSEA 9% HARTINGTON 11% Figure 1 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township. Health services were reported as the most commonly used service in the past 12 months (68.5%), followed by library services (60.3%), physical recreation services (57.5%), and social clubs and services (46.6%). Less than a third of respondents reported using skills workshops (31.5%), food services (25.9%), transportation services (16.4%), or housing services (8.2%) within the past 12 months (Figure 2). 8 Page 158 of 192 Percentage of Participants 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Figure 2 The percent of survey respondents who answered “yes” to using a specific service type in South Frontenac Township (n=73). Community Analysis The responses within the smaller communities varied from the average use of services as shown in Figure 21 as did mean age, the gender ratio and service use (Table 1). 9 Table 1 The number of respondents from the smaller community within South Frontenac Townships, and the percent of respondents from each community that reported using a service. Number of Responses Average Age (years) % female % male % use of Health Services % use Library Services % use of PhysRec Services % use of Social Clubs or Services % use of Skills Workshops % use Food Services % use Transp. Services % use of Housing Sydenham Hartington Battersea Harrowsmith Inverary Perth Road Verona Glenburnie Elginburg Sunbury Godfrey 26 8 7 6 6 5 5 4 2 2 2 72.2 77 75.6 75 71 72.6 69.6 78.5 68 68.5 66 76.9 87.5 57.1 83.3 100 60 80 50 0 50 100 23.1 12.5 42.9 16.7 0 40 20 50 100 50 0 46.2 75 100 83.3 66.7 80 80 100 0 100 100 69.2 75 14.3 83.3 33.3 40 80 50 100 0 100 38.4 75 71.4 83.3 0 40 60 50 0 50 0 30.8 87.5 85.7 66.7 0 40 20 0 100 100 0 7.7 25 28.6 33.3 33.3 40 0 0 100 50 0 0 25 57.1 50 33.3 20 40 0 0 50 0 15.4 0 28.6 16.7 33.3 20 20 100 0 50 0 7.7 0 28.6 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 South Frontenac Township 73 72.8 74 26 68.5 60.3 57.5 46.6 31.5 25.9 16.5 8.2 10 Page 159 of 192 As seen in the table, Sydenham had a much larger proportion of respondents than the other communities. The smallest portion of respondents were from Elginburg, Sunbury, and Godfrey, with two respondents each. This resulted in skewed answers for these communities, and limited perspectives. In Elginburg, both respondents were female, and Godfrey, both male. In both these communities, the two respondents utilized the same services, further skewing the results. The oldest group of respondents was from Glenburnie at an average 78.5 years old, and the youngest in Godfrey at 66 years old. There were no communities that reported using zero services at all; however, Godfrey respondents reported only health and library service usage. Battersea was the only community that reported usage in all service categories. Page 160 of 192 Service Analysis Health Services Health Services was the most used service across South Frontenac Township. The average age of health service users survey was 72.9 years old. Services included in the survey were: doctor visits, hospital visits, blood pressure clinic, foot care clinic, caregiver relief/respite, nursing care, diabetes clinic, elder abuse information, daily care services, and visual impairment information. Of the older adults who reported using health services, the largest proportion was from Sydenham at 24% (Figure 3). All participants from communities of Battersea, Glenburnie, and Godfrey reported health service usage (Figure 4). Of the health service options available on the survey, the Foot Care Clinic was the most popular (Figure 5). SUNBURY 4% GODFREY 4% GLENBURNIE 8% SYDENHAM 24% VERONA 8% HARTINGTON 12% PERTH RD 8% INVERARY 8% HARROWSMITH 10% BATTERSEA 14% Figure 3 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Health Services. 11 Page 161 of 192 Percentage of Respondents 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 4 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Health Services?” 20 18 Number of Participants 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Blood Pressure Clinic Foot Care Clinic Caregiver Nursing Care Respite Diabetes Clinic Daily Care Services Visual Impairment Information Other Figure 5 The number of survey respondents who reported using each health service option. 12 Page 162 of 192 Library Services Library Services was the second most used service across South Frontenac Township. The average age of library users surveyed was 71.9 years old. Services included in the survey were: borrowing material, computers or Wi-Fi, attending programs and events, printing or photocopying, 3D printing, websites, e-resources (such as downloading eBooks). Of the older adults who reported using library services, the largest proportion was from Sydenham at 41% (Figure 6). All participants from communities of Elginburg and Godfrey reported library service usage (Figure 7). Borrowing materials was the most common library service activity by a wide margin (Figure 8). ELGINBURG 5% GLENBURNIE 5% GODFREY 5% VERONA 9% SYDENHAM 41% PERTH RD 4% INVERARY 4% HARROWSMITH 11% BATTERSEA 2% HARTINGTON 14% Figure 6 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Library Services. 13 Page 163 of 192 Percentage of Respondents 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 7 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Library Services?” 40 Number of Participants 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Borrowing Materials Wifi Attending programs E-resources Printing Other Figure 8 The number of survey respondents who reported using each library service option. 14 Page 164 of 192 Physical Recreation Services The average age of physical recreation services users surveyed was 72.4 years old. Services included in the survey were: fitness programs, seniors activity club, walking club, darts club, and bridge club. Of the older adults who reported using physical recreation services, the largest proportion was from Sydenham at 29% (Figure 9). All participants from Battersea reported physical recreation usage (Figure 10). Fitness programs were by far the most popular among those who participated in physical recreation services (Figure 11). GLENBURNIE 6% VERONA 9% SUNBURY 3% SYDENHAM 29% PERTH RD 6% HARROWSMITH 15% HARTINGTON 17% BATTERSEA 15% Figure 9 The percentage of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Physical Recreation Services. 15 Page 165 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 10 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Physical Recreation Services?” 35 Number of Participants 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Fitness Programs Seniors Walking Club Activity Club Other Diabetes Clinic Daily Care Services Visual Impairment Information Other Figure 11 The number of survey respondents who reported using each physical recreation option. 16 Page 166 of 192 Social Clubs and Services The average age of social club services users surveyed was 73.2 years old. Services included in the survey were: book club, day trips, seniors’ dances, euchre club, mahjong club, social café, movie night, poker club, and travel groups. Of the older adults who reported using social clubs and services, the largest proportion was from Sydenham at 25%, with Hartington close behind at 21% (Figure 12). All participants from Battersea, Sunbury, and Elginburg reported social clubs and services usage (Figure 13). Respondents who utilized social clubs or services reported using “other” services most often, closely followed by the social café and book club (Figure 14). ELGINBURG 6% VERONA 3% PERTH RD 6% SUNBURY 6% SYDENHAM 25% HARROWSMIT H 12% HARTINGTON 21% BATTERSEA 21% Figure 12 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Social Clubs and Services. 17 Page 167 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 13 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Social Clubs and Services?” 18 16 Number of Participants 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Book Club Euchre Club Social Café Other Figure 14 The number of survey respondents who reported using each social club or service option. 18 Page 168 of 192 Skills Workshops The average age of skills workshop users surveyed was 72.7 years old. Services included in the survey were: special interest (arts, travel) workshop, legal issues workshop, technology classes, tax clinic, language skills, estate planning, art classes, driving course, retirement planning course, and seniors and law enforcement together (SALT). Of the older adults who reported using skills, the largest proportion was tied at 14% each in Sydenham and Hartington (Figure 15). All participants from Elginburg reported skills workshops usage (Figure 16). SALT was the most popular skills workshop among respondents, with legal issues workshops being a close second (Figure 17). SUNBURY 7% SYDENHAM 14% ELGINBURG 13% HARTINGTON 14% PERTH RD 13% BATTERSEA 13% INVERARY 13% HARROWSMITH 13% Figure 10 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Skills Workshops. 19 Page 169 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 16 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Life Skills Workshops?” 16 Number of Participants 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Special Language Legal Issues Technology Tax Clinic Interest Skills Workshop Classes Workshops Estate Art Classes Retirement Planning Planning Course SALT Figure 17 The number of survey respondents who reported using each life skills or workshop option. 20 Page 170 of 192 Food Services The average age of food services users surveyed was 73.6 years old. Services included in the survey were: breakfast club, diner’s/luncheon club, meals on wheels (hot food delivery), meals on wheels (frozen food), nutrition classes and the food bank. Of the older adults who reported using food services, the largest proportion was from Battersea at 27% (Figure 18). Over half of the participants from Battersea reported food service usage (Figure 19). Of the food service options, the most common was Diner’s Club, followed by hot meals on wheels and frozen meals on wheels options (Figure 20). VERONA 13% SUNBURY 7% HARTINGTON 13% PERTH RD 7% BATTERSEA 27% INVERARY 13% HARROWSMITH 20% Figure 18 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Food Services. 21 Page 171 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 19 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Food Services?” 18 16 Number of Participants 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Breakfast Club Diner's Club Meals on Wheels (hot) Meals on Wheels (frozen) Nutrition Classes Food Bank Other Figure 20 The number of survey respondents who reported using each food service option. 22 Page 172 of 192 Transportation Services The average age of transportation services users surveyed was 73.2 years old. Respondents were also asked how often they used transportation services. Of the older adults who reported using transportation services, the largest proportion was from Sydenham at 34% (Figure 21). Inverary and Sunbury had the highest rates of transportation usage (Figure 22). Most respondents who reported transportation service use only used it rarely (Figure 23). SUNBURY 8% VERONA 8% SYDENHAM 34% PERTH RD 8% INVERARY 17% BATTERSEA 17% HARROWSMITH 8% Figure 21 The percentage of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Transportation Services. 23 Page 173 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 22 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Transportation Services?” 6 Number of Participants 5 4 3 2 1 0 Rarely Monthly Weekly Several times a week Figure 23 The number of survey respondents who reported using each transportation services at each usage frequency. 24 Page 174 of 192 Housing Services The average age of housing services users surveyed was 69.7 years old. Services included in the survey were: rent geared to income, homelessness prevention services, homeless shelter, affordable housing information, home safety information and living alone support. Of the older adults who reported using housing services, usage was tied between Sydenham, Verona, and Battersea (Figure 24). A large proportion of Verona respondents used housing compared to other communities (Figure 25). Rent geared to income and living alone support were the only two housing supports named on the survey to be reported, with several respondents selecting “other” (Figure 26). VERONA 33% SYDENHAM 34% BATTERSEA 33% Figure 24 The percent of survey respondents that were from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported using Housing Services. 25 Page 175 of 192 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes No No Response Figure 25 The percent of survey respondents from each community within or just beyond South Frontenac Township that reported “yes”, “no” or gave no response to the question: “Do you currently utilize Housing Services?” 4.5 4 Number of Participants 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Rent Geared to Income Living Alone Support Other Figure 26 The number of survey respondents who reported using each housing service option. 26 Page 176 of 192 Vulnerability Analysis Expressed Need Based on Age The survey responses demonstrated a change in expressed need due to age. Age was tested against how often resident left their homes (F=4.532, p<0.0001), whether they had enough to eat (F=9.30, p<0.0001), and whether they could afford housing payments (F=13.03, p<0.0001). In all three cases, age significantly impacted responses. Expressed Need by Income Expressed Need by Income Income had a significant impact on how often the survey respondents reported leaving their home (F=7.427, p<0.0001). Income also had a significant impact on whether older adults had enough food to eat (F=5.70, p<0.0001) and whether they were able to afford their housing payments (F=3.816, p<0.001). Expressed Need by Isolating Factors Most participants had access to a personal vehicle (79.5%), but those who did not had slightly lower rates of visiting their family doctor (Figure 27), and significantly higher rates of visiting the emergency department (F=3.28, p<0.003, Figure 28). Those without access to a personal vehicle had lower usage of library and physical recreation services (F=6.92, p<0.002, Figure 29; 30), and were more likely not to have enough to eat compared to those with a personal vehicle (F=3.686, p<0.03, Figure 31). Mobility also influenced expressed need. Reduced mobility significantly decreased older adults leaving home (F=4.425, p<0.007). Lack of mobility, however, was not significant in whether older adults had enough food to eat, and if they could afford their housing, (F=0.81, p<0.949; F=1.15, p<0.337). Living with children or a spouse did not significantly increase the likelihood that an older adult would leave home daily (F=0.785, p<0.46) and living alone was not significant in explaining if an older adult had enough food to eat (F=1.029, p<0.363) or was able to make housing payments (F=0.244, p<0.784). 27 Page 177 of 192 Respondents with Access to a Personal Respondents Without Access to a Vehicle Personal Vehicle Figure 27 Percent of respondants with access to a personal vehicle who have and have not seen their Family Doctor in the past 12 months (left, n=58); compared to the percentage of respondents who do not have access to a personal vehicle (right, n=15). Figure 28 Percent of respondants with access to a personal vehicle who have and have not been to the Emergency Department in the past 12 months (left, n=58); compared to the percentage of respondents who do not have access to a personal vehicle (right, n=15). 28 Page 178 of 192 Figure 29 Percentage of respondants with access to a personal vehicle who do or do not use Library Services in the past 12 months (left, n=58); compared to the percentage of respondents who do not have access to a personal vehicle (right, n=15). Figure 30 Percentage of respondants with access to a personal vehicle who do or do not use Physical Recreation Services in the past 12 months (left, n=58); compared to the percentage of respondents who do not have access to a personal vehicle (right, n=15). Figure 31. Percentage of respondants with access to a personal vehicle who reported having or not having enough to eat in the past 12 months (left, n=58); compared to the percentage of respondents who do not have access to a personal vehicle (right, n=15). 29 Page 179 of 192 Interview Results Of the interview participants, 11 were female (68.7%) and 5 were male (31.3 %). The average age was slightly older than the survey participants at 73.8 years old. Four required the use of a mobility device, and three required transportation services. There were three main themes that developed throughout the interviews: 1) As an aspiration goal, older adults had the desire to age in their community, 2) As a realistic view, older adults questioned whether it would be possible 3) Older adults felt transportation and funding were the largest barriers to accessing services These themes were discussed at least once by each participant, despite varying gender, age, and socio-economic status. Other themes that were common in the interviews included volunteer work, awareness about services, an increase in programming in trades/skills, and the desire for a centralized information dissemination centre that older adults could contact to learn about all available services in their area. Desire to Age-in-Place Most interviewees wished to remain in their homes in their rural communities. Many alluded to social ties and nearby family as reasons to stay, while others felt the city was too busy for their lifestyle. Many were steadfast that they would remain at home, even if that meant reduced access to services. They enjoyed the peace of rural living as one participant described: “Absolutely I have a desire to stay where I am. I live on a lake, and because of conservation areas no one can live around me. It’s wonderful. I have no desire to go anywhere.” This attitude was reflected in several interview responses, especially in regard to the connection to the outdoors. Some interviewees felt moving into the city to be closer to resources would diminish a part of their identity: “Yes, I will stay. I built my own house, have a huge amount of land... I was always outdoors throughout my life, I taught canoeing. I want to stay; the city has nothing for me.” Many felt that the social networks they had formed will help them navigate challenges to service access. Others said they will probably rely on family members, whether it might be a 30 Page 180 of 192 spouse, sibling or their child(ren) to supplement the services they can obtain. One interviewee spoke of how his sister had helped their father with accessing services: “My Dad still lives here, 93 and lives alone in the country. What does he need? He gets my sister to help – without her he would need someone to come to his house daily. Meals on wheels, someone to help with insulin, cleaning.” While the majority of the older adults wished to stay in their homes while they aged, several of the interviewees expressed a desire to move into Kingston. One respondent, who is unable to drive, noted that at least in town she would have access to public transportation to reach services. She mentioned how having no family in the area made her incredibly lonely, and that the only reason she remained in the study area is that she cannot afford to pay for a private room, so she must wait for a subsidized one to become available. Another participant commented on winter driving conditions becoming more treacherous each year, and that while they did not think the move would be immediate, they planned on moving into the city within the next 10 years. Most participants recognized that remaining at home would eventually require community support but were unsure as to the exact supports they would need. About half of the interviewees were currently utilizing services. The services being used ranged from social coffees and exercise programs to full respite and adult day programs. Transportation was the most common service interviewees thought they would need, especially during harsh winter months. Many interviewees also mentioned help with housework and maintenance, as well as food services. In terms of finding services, those already participating in community services came to learn about them in a variety of ways. The local paper, church, lake association and word-ofmouth recommendations were all mentioned when asked about how interviewees learned about services. Some of those not involved in services expressed uncertainty about what programs were available and suggested that having a phone line or guide created for rural older adults can assist those currently not connected with services. One interviewee mentioned how understanding what services fall within different organizations can be daunting, especially for rural residents. He felt part of the solution was in awareness: “Communication of available services [is a step organizations could take to improve access]. A centralized area of information disseminations – or something like that. Sometimes social services are under different governments, so knowing the full range of what is available and keeping everyone involved connected. The challenge is in spreading information in rural areas.” Many interviewees felt that safely aging-in-place would only be possible with strong local connections. Many of those currently using services had learned of them from neighbours or friends or local organizations such as churches, highlighting the importance of community 31 Page 181 of 192 connections. Several of the interviewees regularly volunteer providing services to others, while others stay involved through church and community groups. Those who wished to stay and age in place were more likely to mention being involved in local groups and felt more confident they would be able to acquire services than those who planned on moving to the city. Many of the interviewees expressed a desire for more physically-active community programs. Suggestions including swimming programming, walking or hiking groups, and more fitness programs. Several of the male interviewees also discussed a desire for more tradesbased programming, such as woodworking or landscaping classes. Transportation Concerns The most common concern from interview participants was the lack of transportation in the study area. All the participants commented on how driving was the primary mode of transportation to services, either by driving themselves or having a significant other or family member drive them. Several of those who drove themselves stated their fear of becoming isolated once they were no longer able to operate a vehicle. Those who did not have access to their own vehicle said that they felt isolated: “Transportation is difficult, I can’t walk to the Grace [Centre] and the guy that used to drive me won’t take me anymore. I’m stuck.” Those who were still able to drive were concerned about winter weather impeding their ability to get services. Two also expressed concern at getting proper nursing or health care services at their homes should they require it, with one providing their experience after having surgery: “I’ve fought with homecare to get services. Commonly get CCAC telling me what they can’t do. Not being responsive to needs. It’s not easy to get into Kingston for services, especially for physiotherapy when you’re not mobile. They didn’t want to send someone out. I had to be an advocate for myself. Advocate for rural populations and help those who don’t know what they deserve or are entitled to fight for it.” Other interviewees discussed transportation as an additional financial barrier to services – that while they may be able to afford a social or exercise program, they cannot afford a taxi to get there. Some commented on volunteer driving groups alleviating some of the pressure for other types of public transportation; however, there are sustainability issues with relying on a solely volunteer strategy. One interviewee recalled that her previous driver refused to transport her any longer after someone told the driver she had bed bugs. Another interviewee who used to volunteer as a driver to local older adults claims that she was removed from the driver’s list as someone complained about listening to gospel music in her car. 32 Page 182 of 192 Funding Issues After transportation, lack of funding was the most prevalent theme among participants. Many felt that local organizations couldn’t meet the needs of older adults because they do not have adequate funding support to do so. Multiple interviewees mentioned that pensions are not enough to maintain quality of life for older adults, and one commented: “My pension just isn’t enough. I was never married, so it’s just what I have. Anytime I do find a little bit more money, they adjust my RGI and there it goes.” Others discussed how efforts to curb government spending always takes away from non-profits and other groups that often work to provide essential services.: “More local government involvement is needed. I serve on a region committee and hear where councilors are making budget cuts, and I seem to hear where they’re cutting is their charity funds first – a “do it yourself” attitude. They just made a cut to Southern Frontenac CS, they gave some money but not nearly what they need.” Without proper funding, service providers are required to charge fees, which can bar lowincome older adults from services they desperately need. The themes from the older adult participant interviews overlapped. The central theme of older adults wanting to age in place was consistent, and several older adults mentioned that rural elderly are resistant to accept help. The participant interviews had a theme of centralized information; a place where all available services within a region could be catalogued and connected to those in need of them. Key Informant Interview The main themes from the older adult interviews were also prevalent in the key informant interview. In particular, ideas surrounding awareness of what services were available and helping connect people in the community to each other were echoed in the interview with Southern Frontenac Community Services. The key informant interview also highlighted that some rural adults struggle to accept help. To some, receiving services requires one to admit that they can no longer sustain themselves completely on their own, and the organization feels that some struggle to admit to not being completely independent. Many older adults may be comfortable receiving care from a family member, but not want others in the community to know that they need help – especially men. According to the CEO: “The challenge is getting people to admit they need help. A lot of seniors say ‘I don’t need charity’ and don’t realize it’s not charity – it’s a support to keep you happy, healthy, and at home.” A key point from the organization interview was that awareness is a significant goal for improving access to rural senior services. In rural communities it can be difficult to know about options if you don’t directly know those involved, and SFCS is aiming to expand local awareness to help engage older adults that are currently being left out. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to 33 Page 183 of 192 gauge how successful any awareness campaign may be, as getting exact numbers of those who need services can be difficult. The interviewee suggests that rural communities should work together sharing information to help: 1) Create a measure to gauge how successful organizations are in engaging rural older adults 2) Create a centralized centre for services, so older adults only have to contact one spot to understand all the services available to them This second recommendation parallels the request of several older adults who were interviewed. The desire to have one source of information on all services would simplify the researching of available services and could prevent older adults in need from becoming overwhelmed between differing providers. 34 Page 184 of 192 Conclusions For the older adult population, access to appropriate and affordable services is essential for maintaining quality of life. As life expectancy continues to increase, the amount of time care is needed has followed this trend, resulting in higher resource consumption much later in life. As people tend to consume the greatest amount of healthcare dollars in the final six months of their life, strategies must be developed for the aging population and the drain that their service needs will place on the system (Ministry of Seniors’ Affairs 2017). Such strategies must strike a delicate balance between the physical, mental, and emotional needs of the growing older adult population and the financial realities of the province and country. A potential solution for this impending crisis is the aging-in-place movement, keeping older adults in their homes receiving community or in-house services for as long as possible. Promoted as a cost-effective approach to providing individualized care, the idea is favoured among older adults who yearn to feel independent and in control of their lifestyles. As older adults age, the desire to remain in their homes is easily understood. Home is where they are familiar, often situated near family and friends within the community where they feel they belong. This sense of belonging is beneficial to mental health, and the thoughts of leaving their communities for a retirement home can be daunting. Paired with testimonies of nursing home abuse and lack of hygiene, it is easy to see why many older adults are against the move into residential care homes. But the truth is that remaining in their own homes will require proper planning and access to support and community services. The cost of home ownership is substantial, especially in Canada. With retirement savings and pensions dwindling to new lows (Schroders 2018), many older adults are finding services – or the ability to get to services – unaffordable. These challenges are then further exacerbated by social determinants such as income, frailty, education, and rurality (Vafaei et al. 2010). Rural populations tend to be at greater health risks than urban populations (Lee & Vouchilas 2016). This phenomenon can compound with age, resulting in an older adult population with greater morbidity and living with more chronic conditions (Boutayeb & Boutayeb 2005). While service hubs such as “Seniors’ Centres” have been developed in cities, rural older adults’ are often left behind with a lack of funding, available infrastructure, and isolation creating barriers to accessibility (Benefield & Holtzclaw 2014; Bascu et al. 2014). Within the rural area of South Frontenac Township, SFCS is responsible for the implementation of community programming, including those for older adults. In this study, the services were categorized into eight different service types: health services, library services, physical recreation services, social clubs and services, food services, transportation services, and housing services. It is important to recognize that older adults who completed the survey and interviews were asked about all services they utilize, and not just those limited to SFCS. 35 Page 185 of 192 The survey found that older adults in South Frontenac Township utilized health services the most. Library and physical recreation services were the second and third most accessed services – but the possession of a personal vehicle appears to be a key component of accessing these services, presenting a barrier to those who are unable or cannot afford to drive. Those who lacked a personal vehicle also demonstrated greater food insecurity and need for emergency healthcare. Income also played a role in expressed need, with decreasing income increasing the prevalence of older adults not having enough food to eat or fearing inability to make housing payments. Personal mobility – evaluated through the requirement of mobile aids such as walkers or wheelchairs – reduced how often older adults ventured out of their homes. Age had a significant impact on expressed need or service use in this sample. Most service categories (health services, library services, etc.) had similar mean ages when user age was examined. Housing services had the youngest average user age at 69.7 years old, and food services the oldest at an average of 73.6 years old. The survey data supported the need for increased community services with age and most interviewees felt that they will need increasing care as they become older consistent with other studies that support this trend (Leach & Joseph 2011; Bascu et al. 2014; Ryser & Halseth 2012). Older adults were especially concerned about transportation and navigating services during winter months, a barrier to care more prevalent in the rural older adult population (Joseph et al. 2015). Indigenous status did not impact expressed needs in this survey sample. Most respondents were white, with only 5.5% identifying as indigenous. This is an interesting conflict with previous research that indicates indigenous populations have higher levels of chronic conditions and poorer health outcomes (Wilson et al. 2010; Beulah-Beatty & Berdahl 2011). However; the sample size of indigenous members was small, which may account for the unusual trends. There is also not a reserve within the township boundaries, so survey participants who identified as indigenous would be providing an off-reserve perspective to services. Compared to national, provincial, and health unit levels, expressed needs for food services was similar in South Frontenac Township. In conversations about service needs, many interviewees discussed transportation issues as their primary concern, which differs from national data that suggests older adults most desire assistance with housework (CCHS 2014). However, when predicting future service needs, more labour-intensive tasks such as landscaping and housework were often cited by interview participants, which reflects the data found from the CCHS. Funding issues were another main concern of interviewees and many mentioned that their parents relied on family and friends to care for them as they were unable to afford paying for services. These concerns are in line with the national, provincial, and health unit data around older adults relying on family caregivers. Survey data indicates that in some communities older people are accessing services at higher rates than others, such as Verona’s high use of housing services and Harrowsmith’s high use of library services. It is difficult to tell if lower usage is due to distance to services or lack of 36 Page 186 of 192 availability, as the survey did not include indications of why someone does or does not use a service. An interesting outcome to the survey was library service use. Within South Frontenac Township there are three library branches – one in Sydenham, one between Sunbury and Battersea, and one in Hartington. Despite being very close to a library, Battersea respondents only reported that 14.3% used the library. The respondents of other communities close to branches reported much higher usage, and some respondents from communities farther from branches, such as Verona, reported up to 80% library usage. However; usage of library services in particular was significantly impacted by the access one has to a personal vehicle. This calls into question whether rural services, especially those available in only some of the smaller communities, are only sustainable with rural older adults who continue to drive. Would centralizing services to the core of the rural region be of any benefit? With rural services often being volunteer driven, having a service move from the smaller community may lose volunteers who were previously involved. While having all services available central to the Township would benefit those close to this centre, perhaps Sydenham in the case of South Frontenac Township, this would leave older adults on the edges of the region farther from services than before. One way to combat these concerns would be to develop a network of reliable transportation within the community for each available service. Southern Frontenac Community Services already uses volunteer drivers for several of its services; Diner’s Club, Day Program, and Meals on Wheels. Expanding this form of transportation to cover all services would require intense recruitment and collaboration but might allow individuals who cannot drive the ability to access services that they could not before. As these participants often could not access services within their smaller community, centralizing at the core of the rural area would not provide a greater barrier to accessibility if it is coupled with a comprehensive transportation strategy. The final option is the potential realization that senior services in rural communities are simply a stepping stone to relocation within an urban area that has greater access to services. As funding and population is typically greater in urban areas compared to rural, organizations have more diversity in their programming and the infrastructure to offer services to more people. Several of the interview respondents noted they planned to move into Kingston in the coming years, expecting their health to decline and their needs to be greater. However; most interviewees expressed a desire to remain living in their current rural community, citing their social connections and wish to be surrounded by nature. Several noted that part of aging in place included compromising on some services that are more readily available in the city – but at what point does compromising on services diminish quality of life beyond what is acceptable? When determining services for rural older adults, the potential solutions to providing services are complex. Access to a personal vehicle was the most significant factor in the use of 37 Page 187 of 192 services, and older adults were concerned that due to lack of funding, those who needed services the most would be unable to afford them. Awareness of available services and how to access them was a common theme among interviewees, with the suggestion of a centralized information centre for South Frontenac Township made several times. Such a facility would centralize information about all available services and providers and help direct older adults to the correct organization based on their needs. This recommendation is made on the premise of maintaining the service model as it currently functions, with smaller communities within the rural network providing services throughout the township. Communication among the communities should be supported through the development of an Older Adult Forum or Activity Group, allowing the volunteers and organizations (SFCS, retiree groups, church groups) to discuss their current services and how they can be better integrated into a comprehensive service network for South Frontenac Township. Limitations The survey sample was 74% female and 26% male, which diverges from the regional split of 51% male and 49% female. For the interviews, the ratio was 68.8 % female and 31.2% male, also skewed towards women. This means there may be expressed needs from older men that have not been given proper consideration. The age range for the project was from 61 years old to 86 years old; which leaves out a significant portion of the very old population 85 and over that may have unique needs compared to younger older adults. With no participants identifying as a visible minority beyond the 5.5% Indigenous group, the impacts of cultural and language barriers could not be assessed. Eight survey respondents indicated that English was not their first language, but their results did not differ in a significant way from other older adults of the same gender. The Indigenous participants reported service use that was very similar to the South Frontenac average, but a small sample size makes it difficult to conclude whether they are being adequately considered in program development. Despite efforts to reach as many older adults as possible, the sample may not reflect the most marginalized and isolated of older adults. Those who do not have internet access or do not leave their home regularly may not have had the opportunity to participate in the same capacity as more mobile older adults. Those who were less connected in the community may have also been disadvantaged from hearing about and accessing this study. The study only included 2% of the older adults within South Frontenac Township, with a large portion coming from the village of Sydenham, where the SFCS offices are located. This may have skewed the results of the survey towards the needs of the older adults residing in or near this specific smaller community. Compared to the general population of South Frontenac Township, the sample group was more female, slightly less likely to live in a detached home (87.7% vs. 96%) and less likely to speak English as their first language (89% vs. 97.8%). The average household income for survey participants was $54,988, lower than the average for South Frontenac Township at $84,953. 38 Page 188 of 192 This may be accounted for by a number of survey respondents being retired and no longer receiving employment income. Survey respondents held postsecondary degrees at a higher rate (65.8% compared to 56.8%) than the rest of South Frontenac Township, and the survey sample was also more likely to be married, divorced, or widowed compared to the general population. These demographic differences between the survey sample and the rest of the population need to be considered when examining the results. The conclusions are based on a small subset of the older adults in South Frontenac Township that are more educated, more likely to be married, and do not include the perspective of individuals who are a part of a visible minority. The survey also did not report where the individuals used the senior services – whether they remained in their small community, travelled to services within a different smaller community, or used services in Kingston. This project provides insight into aging from the perspective of older adults. When considering the question of whether rural communities can support aging, this perspective only provides a partial answer. As seen in previous literature, many services in rural communities rely on volunteer work. This was reflected in the interviews with some of the older adults, but an in-depth analysis of the volunteer perspective was not included. This gap makes it difficult to assess whether these communities can support the needs of rural older adults. A final limitation would be the lack of government perspective in the study. While the Ontario Seniors Action Plan has been referenced, local officials within South Frontenac township were not consulted. This results in the lack of perspective from policy-makers and those who contribute funding towards programming for older adults. To determine whether rural communities can support the rural older adult population it would be important to study all the contributing parties – government, organizations, volunteers, and older adults – and how they work together to come to a comprehensive conclusion. 39 Page 189 of 192 References Bacsu, J., Jeffrey, B., Abonyi, S., Johnson, S., Novik, N., Martz, D. & Oosman, S. (2014). Healthy Aging in Place: Perceptions of Rural Older Adults. Educational Gerontology. 40:327-337 Benefield L.E., & BJ Holtzclaw (2014). Aging in Place: Merging desire with reality. Nurse Clin N Am 49: 123-131 Beulah-Beatty, B., & Berdahl, L., (2011). Health Care and Aboriginal Seniors in Urban Canada: Helping a Neglected Class. The International Indigenous Policy Journal.2(1) DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2011.2.1.10 Boutayeb A. & S. Boutayeb (2005) The burden of non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Int J Equity Health 4:2 Canadian Community Health Survey (2014). Statistics Canada, Public Use Microdata File, Statistics Canada Cobigo, V. & Stuart, H. (2010) Social inclusion and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 23(5): 453-457 Dammann, K.W., & Smith, C. (2009). Factors affecting low-income women’s food choices and the perceived impact of dietary intake and socioeconomic status on their health and weight. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 41(4): 242-253. Fiske, A., Leobach Wetherell, J., & Gats, M. (2009). Depression in Older Adults. Annual Review of Clinicial Psychology 5: 363-389. Joseph, GM, Yantzi, N.M., & Skinner, M.W. (2015) The Icy Path: Accounting for Weather in the Care and Support of Vulnerable Populations in the Home and Community. J Comm Pub Health Nursing 1: 104 Karlsen, S. & Nazroo, J. (2002). Agency and structure: the impact of ethnic identity and racism on the health of ethnic minority people. Sociology of Health & Illness 24(1): 1-20 Kottorp, A., Johansson, K., Aase, P., & Rosenberg, L. (2016). Housing for ageing LGBTQ people in Sweden: a descriptive study of needs, preferences, and concerns. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 23(5): 337-346. Leach, B, & Joseph, G.M. (2011) Rural long-term care work, gender and restructuring. Can J Aging 30: 211-221. 40 Page 190 of 192 Lee M.O. & G. Vouchilas (2016). Preparing to age-in-place: attitudes, approaches, and actions. Housing and Society: DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2016.1221039 Ministry of Seniors Affairs (2017). Aging with confidence: Ontario’s action plan for seniors. The Government of Ontario. Ontario Seniors Secretariat (2013). Independence, activity and good health: An action plan for seniors. The Government of Ontario Schroders Global Investor Study (2018). Saving for a comfortable retirement. Schroder Investment Management Limited. England & Wales. Statistics Canada (2011). CANSIM table 051-0001. Ryser, L. & Halseth, G. (2012). Resolving Mobility Constraints Impeding Rural Seniors’ Access to Regionalized Services. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 24:328-344. Vafaei, A., Rosenberg, M.W., & Pickett, W. (2010). Relationships between income inequality and health: a study on rural and urban regions of Canada. Rural and Remote Health 10: 1430. Wilson, K., Rosenberg, M.W. & Abonyi, S. (2011). Aboriginal peoples, health and healing approaches: The effects of age and place on health. Social Science & Medicine 72, 355-364 41 Page 191 of 192 Page 192 of 192 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2019-24 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of April 2, 2019 be confirmed. 2. Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed. 3. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 2 day of April, 2019. Read a first and second time this 2 day of April, 2019. Read a third time and finally passed this 2 day of April, 2019. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ______________________________ Ron Vandewal, Mayor ____________________________________ Angela Maddocks, Clerk

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.

Council - 02 Apr 2019 - Agenda

Document Text

m .@ !L, U) ? ? -? a) :>’ as

ffi ‘8

52566ÿ2"ÿ8321 4182ÿ# 6ÿ"163665”-ÿ.8#ÿ"8ÿ561"5246ÿ,28#ÿ455ÿ16ÿ

. I’fN 86249-(1488 (LT)

52566ÿ2"ÿ8321 4182ÿ# 6ÿ"163665”-ÿ.8#ÿ"8ÿ561"5246ÿ,28#ÿ455ÿ16ÿ