Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: June 16, 2020 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2020/Council - 16 Jun 2020 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
Page 1 of 153
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Online via Teleconference and Broadcast live to the South Frontenac’s Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp TIME: DATE: PLACE:
7:00 PM, Tuesday, June 16, 2020 Electronic Participation.
Call to Order
a)
Roll Call and Resolution
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
Approval of Agenda
a)
Resolution
Scheduled Closed Session - not applicable
Recess* - not applicable
Delegations - not applicable
Public Meeting
a)
Public Meeting Statement & Resolution
b)
Zoning By-law Amendment - Z-20-03, Con 4, Part Lot 18 - 3898 Greenfield Rd (Bruce & Denise Wright)
c)
Resolution - Close Public Meeting
Approval of Minutes
a)
June 2, 2020 Council Meeting
Business Arising from the Minutes
a)
Assumption of Responsibilities under Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code
103 114
b)
Notice of Motion - Speed Limit Reduction
115
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Price Increase for Blue Boxes and Composters
3 4 - 98
99 102
116
Page 2 of 153
b)
City of Kingston inclusion in 2020 Crack Sealing Program
117
c)
Tender PS-2020-21 Resurfacing of Centennial & Gerald Ball Netsports Courts
118 119
Committee Meeting Minutes - not applicable
By-laws - not applicable
Reports for Information
a)
Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing
120 129
b)
Proposed 2020 Construction and Maintenance Schedule
130 131
c)
Tender No. PS-2020-20: 2020-2022 Screened Winter Sand
132 133
Information Items
a)
Support for Conservation Authorities
134 140
b)
Township of Puslinch - Review of Farm Property Class Tax Rate Program
141 142
c)
Request to MNRF to review practices/procedures when designating Provincially Significant Wetlands
143 150
Notice of Motions
Announcements/Statements by Councillors
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
a)
COVID-19 Questions from the Community
Closed Session (if requested)
Confirmatory By-law
a)
By-law 2020-31
Adjournment
a)
Resolution
151 152
153
Page 3 of 153
The purpose of this public meeting is to hear comments on a Zoning By-Law Amendment application. If a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to South Frontenac Township before the by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. If you wish to be notified of the decision of Council in respect to any of the applications, you must submit a written request to the Clerk or sign the attendance list provided at today’s meeting. This will also entitle you to be advised of a possible Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. Anyone may appeal the decision to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal by filing with the Clerk within 20 days of the notice of decision. An appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal may be filed with the Clerk of the Township not later than 20 days after the day that the notice of decision was given. The notice of appeal must set out the objection to the bylaw and the reasons in support of the objection, accompanied by the required fee.
Page 4 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
Public Meeting Report – Zoning Bylaw Amendment Report Date:
June 10, 2020
Application No: Owner: Location of Property:
Z-20-03 Bruce and Denise Wright 3898 Greenfield Road, Part Lot 18, Concession 4 being Part 1 on Plan 13R19169, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac Purpose of Application: Rezone from Rural Waterfront – Site Specific Zone (RW-27) to Rural Waterfront - Site Specific Zone (RW-45) Date of Public Meeting: June 16, 2020 (Virtual Public Meeting)
Recommendation It is recommended that South Frontenac Council defer making a decision on application Z-20-03 to consider agency and public comments. Planning staff will bring forward a report at the July 14, 2020 Council meeting providing a further recommendation and bringing forward a by-law for Council’s consideration.
Proposal The property at 3898 Greenfield Road is currently zoned Waterfront Residential Zone – Special Provisions (RW-27). The RW-27 zoning was put in place when this 2.58 hectare (6.37 acre) lot was created by consent in 2008. The RW-27 zoning established a setback of 45m for the dwelling and a setback of 300m for the septic from the highwater mark or floodline of Loughborough Lake. The current owners purchased the lot in 2019 with the intent to build a dwelling and an accessory storage building (identified as a dome on the attached sketch). On detailed investigation, it has been determined that a septic system is not able to be located within the boundaries of the lot at a setback of 300m from the highwater mark/flood line of Loughborough Lake. The owners have applied to the Township to change the zoning on the property from Waterfront Residential Zone – Special Provisions (RW-27) to Waterfront Residential Zone – Special Provisions (RW-45). The RW-45 zone would maintain a 45m setback for the dwelling, but proposes to permit the septic system to be located at 75m from the highwater mark/flood line of Loughborough Lake. The RW-45 zone also proposes to permit the construction of a 249 square metre (3,164 square foot) accessory storage building (dome) in the front yard (between the proposed house and Greenfield Road) at a setback of 150 metres from Greenfield Road with a maximum height of 6.7m (22 feet).
Background COVID 19 The Wright’s submitted a zoning by-law amendment application on February 19, 2020 and submitted a supporting Terrain Analysis Report for 3898 Greenfield Road prepared by Groundwork Engineering Limited dated January 10, 2020. The Wright’s provided a revised copy of the Terrain Analysis Report dated February 25, 2020. The application
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 1
Page 5 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
and supporting Terrain Analysis Report was circulated to relevant commenting agencies. The application was originally scheduled to have a public meeting date of April 7, 2020, but was delayed due to the COVID 19 Provincial and Local Emergency. The Township has now put in place the ability to schedule a Virtual Public meeting and has scheduled the public meeting for June 16, 2020. Site Conditions The subject property is located along the southern shoreline of the west basin of Loughborough Lake along Greenfield Road. The topography of the site rises quickly from the shoreline, then rises more gently in a southerly direction towards Greenfield road. The northern portion of the lot is fairly heavily treed, with the more southerly portion being a grassed field. There is a ridge that runs east-west through the lot, with approximately one-third of the lot being north of the ridge and approximately two-thirds of the lot area being south of the ridge. The building envelope for the house is situated at approximately 45m from the highwater mark of the lake, north of the ridge. The applicants have been clearing trees to create a building envelope for the house. An accessory structure (dome) is proposed to be situated along the ridge in a clearing amongst the trees. The west basin of Loughborough Lake is identified by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry as a cold water lake trout lake; managed for lake trout and is currently classified by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) as “at capacity” for development. MECP indicated that while this designation does not preclude lot creation under certain circumstances and responsible development on existing lots of record, it should be done in a way that minimizes impact to sensitive surface water features such as maintaining a setback that is back as far as reasonably possible from the lake and managing other site development issues such as lot coverage, minimizing surface runoff and hardening the landscape. Loughborough Lake is highly sensitive to phosphorus inputs from sewage systems because phosphorus is a key control on the ecosystem that supports the Lake Trout population. Highly sensitive lakes are considered to be “at-capacity” in terms of development and the creation of new single lots with lakeshore frontage are discouraged unless it can be demonstrated that the development will not cause negative impacts on the Lake. Creation of the Subject Lot in 2008 Under certain circumstances, new single lots with lakeshore frontage can be developed if the conventional septic system is to be located greater than 300m from the highwater mark of a highly sensitive lake trout lake. The consent application that created the subject property was approved in 2008. It was granted on the basis that a conventional septic system would be located greater than 300m from the lake, in the southeastern portion of the lot, near Greenfield Road. The subject property was one of three lots that were created in 2008 from the original rural waterfront parcel. The creation of the three lots was supported by a report entitled “Environmental Impact Assessment, An Evaluation of a Parcel of Land on Part of Lot 18, Concession 4, Township of South Frontenac, Storrington District, Loughborough “Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 2
Page 6 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
Lake (West Basin) for Three Consent Applications” (EIA) completed by Ontario Lake Assessments (OLA) and dated July 2007. Section 6.1.1 of the July 2007 EIA stated: The envelope for the proposed septic bed is 300 metres (984’) perpendicular straight-line distance from the shoreline of the lake and is near Greenfield Road; distances were recorded with a handheld GPS. It will be necessary to pump effluent from the proposed building envelope site over the elevation to the septic bed site near Greenfield Road in order to achieve the required 300m setback. In 2008, the three lots that were created by severance were rezoned to RW-27, to establish a minimum setback from the highwater mark for the dwelling (45m) and the septic system (300m). A development agreement was registered on the property at the time the lots were created. The development agreement notes that the development on the lands will be according to the best practices as set out in the Environmental Assessment of Ontario Lake Assessments dated July 2007. It also establishes that a site plan setting out the location of the dwelling, septic and vegetation, will be required prior to the issuance of the building permit. Current Proposal & Supporting Terrain Analysis The RW (Rural Waterfront) zoning deems the front lot line of the property to be adjacent to Greenfield Road. Accessory buildings are not normally permitted in the front yard, and yet on this property, locating an accessory building on the water side of the proposed dwelling is not practical. The applicant is seeking to obtain permission to place the 249 square metre (3,164 square foot) accessory building (dome) at a setback of approximately 150m from Greenfield Road amongst a treed area on the ridge. They are also seeking approval to construct the accessory building (dome) with a maximum height of 22m. Along with seeking permission to locate an accessory building in the front yard of the property, the applicant is seeking to obtain approval to reduce the setback from the highwater mark from 300m and to seek approval to install a tertiary septic system at 75m from the highwater mark. The lot was purchased by the applicants, and current owners in April 2019. It is their intent to construct a new house, accessory building and septic system on the property. On a detailed review of their proposed building plans with the Chief Building Official, it was identified that when the 300m setback from the highwater mark is applied to their lot, it was identified that the septic system was not able to be placed within the boundaries of the lot. It was identified by the Chief Building Official, who also acts as the Zoning By-law Administrator that the approach taken to measure the 300m setback from the highwater mark at the time the lots were created, is not consistent with how the zoning by-law requires the setback to be applied at the time of building. The zoning bylaw requires the shortest distance to be measured at a right angle between the highwater mark and the proposed building site. The approach used to assess the 300m setback at the time of lot creation was to measure to the highwater mark within the boundary of the lot, which in this situation is not the shortest distance to the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake when considering the placement of the septic system. Slides included in the powerpoint presentation that accompanies this report illustrate the 300m setback from the highwater mark that applies to this property.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 3
Page 7 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
The applicants and owners of the lot, Mr. and Mrs. Wright, engaged the services of Martin Burger, P. Eng, with Groundwork Engineering Limited (GEL) to prepare a terrain analysis to determine a suitable solution to be able to place a septic system on the lot. In order to support the rezoning application, Groundwork Engineering prepared a report titled “3898 Greenfield Road, Terrain Analysis Report (Revised), Groundworks Engineering Limited (GEL), February, 25, 2020”. The report from Groundwork Engineering indicates that there is no part on the lot that is greater than 300m from the highwater mark or floodline of Loughborough Lake (West Basin). Groundwork Engineering’s report indicates the proposed site only has 278m of separation from the highwater mark to the southern property line. The report indicates that field work consisting of a topographic survey, excavation of five (5) test pits and soil sampling was undertaken in November 2019. The Terrain analysis report is attached to this report for Council’s information. Groundwork Engineering prepared a site plan showing the proposed location of the dwelling, septic and accessory building which is attached to this report. Section 4.0 of the Terrain Analysis report documents the results of the five test pits that were excavated on-site. Section 5.0 of the report identifies that there is a topographic feature that conveys flows of surface water from east to west across the southern portion of the property. This section notes that infiltration of this surface water is expected to be poor through the silty clay overburden in the southern half of the property and will likely migrate to the highly fractured, exposed limestone to the west of the site. In addition to the information in the report, the applicant provided photographs of this surface water feature after a heavy rainfall on April 30, 2020. It appears that there is surface water crossing the south portion of the lot in a concentrated flow path on the southern portion of the lot during heavy rain events or seasonal melt events. The surface water gathers into a gully within the exposed karst topography of the lot immediately to the west of the subject property before flowing into Loughborough Lake. Photos supplied by the applicant of the surface water crossing the lot after the April 30th, 2020 rainfall are incorporated in the powerpoint presentation that accompanies this report. The Terrain Analysis report concludes the approved building lot at 3898 Greenfield Road does not provide the required 300m minimum setback from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake. It also concludes the heavier clay soils prevalent on the south half of the property would limit the septic bed effluent dispersal to be a fully raised bed with imported sandy soils. Effluent leaving the sand in the raised beds would tend to migrate horizontally until it encounters heavier clay soils. According to Groundworks Engineering, the existing topography on the south portion of the site leads to surface drainage conveyed through shallow swales to exposed highly fractured bedrock on the adjacent western property providing a direct route for untreated and treated effluent to affect the lake. The report concludes that a Level IV on site waste water treatment system approved under CAN/BNQ 3680-600 (tertiary treatment) certification is highly recommended for this site.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 4
Page 8 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
It identifies that soils observed in test pits 80m from the shoreline indicate a silty sand with the potential to absorb phosphorous. The report also identifies that specialized sands would need to be added in order to construct the effluent dispersal bed. It is noted that the proposed system at approximately 80m from the shoreline would be a partially raised system. The type of system the report recommends for this property requires the owner to enter into a maintenance agreement with the Township to ensure annual inspection of the treatment system and sampling and analysis of effluent to ensure the treatment system is achieving minimum effluent criteria in accordance with OBC requirements. A copy of that report would be required to be filed with the Township on an annual basis. Policy Analysis As with all planning applications, a review of the proposal is required against the Planning policy framework. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 The 2020 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS promotes efficient land use and development patterns that support strong, liveable and healthy communities, protect the environment and public health and safety, and facilitate economic growth. Section 1.1.5.2 of the PPS permits rural residential development, including lot creation in Rural lands. The PPS states when directing development on rural lands, a planning authority shall apply the relevant policies of Section 1: Building Strong Healthy Communities, as well as the policies of Section 2: Wise Use and Management of Resources and Section 3: Protecting Public Health and Safety. Section 1.1.1 c) speaks to avoiding development and land use patterns which may cause environmental or public health and safety concerns. Section 2.2.2 of the PPS speaks to restricting development and site alteration in or near sensitive surface water features and sensitive ground water features such that these features and their related hydrologic functions will be protected, improved or restored. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches may be required in order to protect, improve or restore sensitive surface water features, sensitive ground water features, and their hydrologic functions. Information from the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks identify Loughborough Lake as a highly sensitive hydrogeological setting having less than 2 metres of overburden overlying fractured bedrock of the Gull River Formation. The site is sensitive because groundwater contaminants originating at/near the surface can reach fractured bedrock and migrate quickly in fractured bedrock aquifers with limited attenuation. Consideration of mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches are considered in the County and Local Official Plan and are implemented at the time of lot creation on “At Capacity” Lake Trout Lakes. Mitigative measures were put in place in 2008 through the use of setbacks (45m for the dwelling and 300m for the septic) at the time the lot was created through rezoning and through implementing the recommendations of the EIA in a development agreement registered on title.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 5
Page 9 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks have expressed concerns that phosphorus treatment objectives attainable by enhanced phosphorus treatment units (tertiary treatment systems) are not considered by the ministry to be low enough (alone) to be protective of the highly sensitive lake. As such MECP, along with other commenting agencies, continue to recommend an effluent dispersal bed be located at the most southerly portion of the property to provide maximum reduction of phosphorus migration to Loughborough Lake. MECP and KFL&A Public Health are confident that a septic system could be designed and engineered on the south west corner of the property in such a way that the concerns about the seasonal surface water drainage can be addressed. Cataraqui Conservation has confirmed that there are no natural hazards or natural heritage on the property identified in Section 2 and 3 of the PPS that is of concern with this proposal. County of Frontenac Official Plan, 2016 The County of Frontenac Official Plan is a framework for guiding development in the County through the management and protection of the natural environment and by providing direction and influence on growth patterns. It is focused on the six themes of economic sustainability, growth management, community building, housing and social services, heritage and culture, and environmental sustainability. The subject lands are designated as Rural in the County of Frontenac Official Plan. In section 3.3. Rural Lands, there are a number of objectives listed, including 3.3.2.2, which is to promote rural living in a manner sensitive to the ecological balance, sensitive to the farming and forestry communities and sensitive to the protection of groundwater and surface water quality and quantity. This objective is achieved through ensuring development is consistent with the local and County Official Plan policies and Zoning By-law to ensure that consideration is given to implement performance standards at the time of lot creation that balances the protection of groundwater and surface water quality while also permitting rural residential development. Within the Rural Lands policies (section 3.3) of the County Official Plan, there are special policies for Waterfront Areas. Policy 3.3.3.4.4 which speaks to the importance of tree cover and vegetation being preserved between the water’s edge and new development, it also speaks to local official plans and zoning by-laws establishing setbacks for septic system leaching beds. This section speaks to a setback of greater than 30m from the ordinary highwater mark may be required in some locations and that local Official Plans shall include criteria for establishing setbacks for development in waterfront areas. This section indicates that greatest setback possible between proposed development and the lake be required. The County also recognizes in section 7.1.4.4.1 that there is a significant number of Lake Trout Lakes within Frontenac County. Appendix 2 in the County of Frontenac Official Plan lists the west basin of Loughborough Lake as an “At Capacity Lake Trout Lake”. It is noted that special protection is required for these lakes and their lake trout populations. It establishes that new lot creation shall not be allowed within 300m of an at-capacity lake trout lake. It also states that Township Official Plans shall contain policies to protect lake trout lakes to deal with exceptions to the prohibition of development near at capacity lakes, such as [septic] tile field setbacks.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 6
Page 10 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, 2003 & Comprehensive Zoning By-law, 2003 The subject property is designated as Rural in the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan. Policies of the Rural designation speak to permitting development that is consistent with maintaining the Township’s rural, natural heritage, and cultural landscape. Section 5.7 of the Official Plan permits limited non-agricultural residential development to provide a variety of living accommodation for residents in the Township in Rural areas of the Township. The South Frontenac Official Plan includes specific policies that deal with lot creation and development of lots of record on Lake Trout Lakes. Section 5.2.8. of the Official Plan lists the west basin of Loughborough Lake as a Highly Sensitive Lake Trout Lake. The policies of this section identifies that development is one of the factors which may reduce the ability of a lake to maintain a healthy self-sustaining lake trout population by adding nutrients (phosphorus and other) which may negatively impact water quality, thereby reducing lake trout habitat. The policies of this section were considered at the time the subject property was created by consent in 2008. Section 5.2.8 a) includes policies that apply to the development or site alterations on or within 300 m of a highly sensitive lake trout lake. Generally, the creation of new lots, through the severance consent process within 300m of a highly sensitive lake trout lake will not be considered. 5.2.8 a) iii): Notwithstanding 5.2.7a)ii, Council may consider the creation of new lots by severance where it can be proven to the satisfaction of Council, in consultation with Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources, that one or more of the following conditions exist: a) The drainage of the proposed lot flows to a separate, non-sensitive watershed as a result of the existing topographical or physical features; b) It can be demonstrated through hydrogeological studies, that the drainage of the sewage effluent will effectively result in a circuitous setback of at least 300m (984.3 feet). c) That new technologies in sewage disposal systems, acceptable to the Ministry of Environment, will be utilized resulting in no adverse effects on lake water quality. d) A conventional septic system (tile bed) will be located outside 300m (984.3 feet) from the highwater mark, provided that total nutrient loading resulting from proposed buildings, construction and land clearing does not adversely affect the water quality of the lake. e) The proposal is supported by a detailed site-specific hydrogeological and soil studies which assess phosphorus distribution, migration and velocity and long-term soil retention capabilities. The original lots were created on the basis of a supportive Environmental Impact Assessment that indicated a conventional septic system will be located on the lot outside the 300m setback from the highwater mark. A rezoning establishing setbacks for the dwelling (45m) and septic system (300m) were established at the time the lots were created. On more detailed site evaluation, it has been determined by the applicant’s engineer (Groundworks Engineering Limited) that there is no more than 278m setback from the
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 7
Page 11 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
highwater mark on the subject property where a septic system can be placed from the highwater mark. The current proposal to locate a septic system that uses new phosphorus reducing technology at 75m from the highwater mark. While the policies of the Official Plan considers allowing lot creation on the basis of new technology, it requires the new technology to be acceptable to the Ministry of Environment. The current proposal of placing a new septic system with phosphorus reducing technology at 75m from the highwater mark is not supported by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) on the subject site as the treatment objectives are not considered low enough alone to be protective of the highly sensitive lake. MECP recognizes this property has been created and is considered a building lot in the Township. MECP is working with the Township and other agency partners to ensure that a septic system can be placed within its boundaries. While recognizing the southerly portion of the lot does not technically meet the 300m setback from the highwater mark that the Official Plan speaks to, the placement of the septic on the most southerly portion of the lot what was contemplated and accepted by all agencies at the time the lot was created in 2008. All agency staff (MECP, CRCA, and KFL&A Public Health) are supportive of finding an adequate septic envelope within the boundaries of the lot that is less than 300m from the highwater mark, but that maintains the intent of the EIA and the objectives of the planning policy framework that applies to the west basin of Loughborough Lake. In an effort to assess the findings of the Terrain Analysis and evaluate the best location for a septic system on the property, Township planning staff undertook 3 site visits to the property: April 21, 2020
May 2, 2020 May 22, 2020
Township planning staff met with KFL&A Public Health staff, the applicant, Mr. Wright and Martin Burger of Groundworks Engineering Township planning staff conducted a site visit after the April 30th, heavy rain. Township planning staff conducted a site visit with staff from the Ministry of Environment (Victor Castro & Kyle Stephenson), and Public Health (Gord Mitchell and Matt Doyle).
Comments from agencies are summarized in the next section of this report.
Agency Analysis and Comments KFL&A Public Health April 8, 2020 – Summary of Comments from Gord Mitchell, KFL&A Public Health • The proposed location at 75m, proposed by Groundworks Engineering meets minimum Part 8 Building Code requirements. • The approved location at the time of the 2008 severance increases the separation from Loughborough Lake by approximately 200m. • Due to the status of Loughborough Lake as an “at capacity” lake trout lake, locating the septic system at the farthest distance from the lake provides the best protection for the lake from nutrients. “Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 8
Page 12 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
• •
Concerns raised by Groundworks Engineering can be easily addressed at the permit stage by increasing building code minimums and using appropriate materials to minimize the impact on the lake. The best case for quality of lake water would be to install Groundworks proposed system in the originally approved location [south portion of the lot adjacent to Greenfield Road] reviewed at the time the lot was created.
June 9, 2020 – Summary of Comments from Matthew Doyle, KFL&A Public Health • Updated comments following May 22, 2020 joint site visit with Township of South Frontenac, MECP and KFL&A Public Health • KFL&A Public Health is in favour of maximizing the distance of the sewage system and Loughborough Lake. • This would put a fully raised conventional sewage system west of the current driveway entrance from Greenfield Road, greater than 250m from Loughborough Lake. • The fully raised conventional sewage system must meet all Building Code requirements. • KFL&A Public Health also support MECP recommendation to import optimum soils and other phosphorus controls as outlined in the Groundwork Engineering Limited terrain analysis report. Cataraqui Conservation March 30, 2020 – • • • •
Summary of Comments from Andrew Schmidt, Supervisor, Development Review, Cataraqui Conservation Staff have concluded that the proposed development will be greater than 15m from the regulatory flood plain of Loughborough Lake. Staff have concluded that the proposed development will be located outside the erosion hazard limit. Staff note the proposed development is not located within an area that is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06. Staff are concerned that the proposal does not seek to maximize the distance between Loughborough Lake and the sewage system. In the opinion of staff, the water setback for a sewage system on a highly sensitive Lake Trout lake should be maximized regardless of the type of sewage system employed. Cataraqui Conservation staff recognize the experience of MECP on these matters and will defer to MECP on this point. Cataraqui Conservation staff recommend the Township consult MECP on the appropriate setback allowance for the sewage system.
Ministry of Environment, Conservation & Parks April 8, 2020 – Summary of Comments from Jon Orpana, Environmental Planner & Environmental Assessment Coordinator, Eastern Region, MECP •
It is understood the original severance for this lot was created with the intent to accommodate a septic tile field at 300m from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake, as inspected by the Public Health Inspectors. MECP is aware that the lot is not able to achieve a 300m setback for the septic system based on how the setback is measured from Loughborough Lake. The Ministry is of the opinion that they would support a location as far back from the highwater mark and as close to 300m setback as possible. MECP supports the installation of the tertiary treatment system at a setback as close to 300m as possible.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 9
Page 13 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
June 5, 2020 – Summary of Comments from Kyle Stephenson, Hydrogeologist, Technical Support Section, Easter Region, MECP •
Mr. Stephenson reviewed the Environmental Impact Assessment dated July 2007, prepared to support the creation of the lot, and the report titled “3898 Greenfield Road, Terrain Analysis” completed by Groundwork Engineering Ltd, dated January 10, 2020. Mr. Stephenson attended the site on May 22, 2020 with Township Planning staff, Public Health staff and other MECP staff.
Mr. Stephenson’s comments are summarized below: • The site is located in a sensitive hydrogeological setting having less than 2 metres of overburden overlying fractured bedrock of the Gull River Formation. The site is sensitive because groundwater contaminants originating at/near the surface can reach fractured bedrock and then migrate quickly in fractured bedrock aquifers. • It is noted that on the adjacent property to the west there is exposed Karst bedrock. Karst landscapes result in conduit-style groundwater flow and greater connectivity between surface waters, sinking streams and groundwater aquifers. • Contaminants generated at the site (dissolved phosphorus from the sewage system) are likely to move towards the lake which acts as a local shallow groundwater discharge point. Loughborough Lake is a highly sensitive lake. Given the like presence of Karst underlying the entire site and the potential for rapid groundwater flow towards the lake, a precautionary approach should be applied to the sewage works location and design. • It is anticipated that effluence leaving a raised effluent dispersal bed in the southern part of the site (near Test Pits 1 and 2) would likely move through roughly 1 metre of unsaturated silty clay soil before reaching fractured bedrock and the shallow groundwater table. Based on observation of groundwater at/near the bedrock surface in all 3 test pits excavated in the southern end of the site, the bedrock does not appear to be so highly permeable/fractured that it rapidly drains groundwater at the overburden/bedrock interface towards the Karst feature west of the site (or downwards into bedrock). It may be that Karst is less well developed in this area [south portion of the lot] under the cover of slightly thicker and lower permeability soils. • Low hydraulic conductivity in clayey soils in the southern portion of the site would likely promote slow groundwater movement until reaching a unit with higher hydraulic conductivity. Shallow groundwater flow in the southern area of the site is likely to be influenced by fractured bedrock/Karst in the area, and once groundwater reaches permeable bedrock, flow would be expected to be rapid towards the lake. • A raised effluent bed located in the southeast corner of the property would maximize the distance from the sensitive lake (>250m) thereby providing the greatest potential for attenuation of septic system effluent. The clayey soils in this area of the site are expected to slow groundwater flow which may provide for additional phosphorus retention in native soils. • The location recommended by GEL in the northern end of the site has thin soils with higher hydraulic conductivity above an area underlain by inferred Karst bedrock. These soils are well drained given that no groundwater was encountered during test pit excavation which suggests permeable bedrock underlies the soils in this area. A bed in this location would operate better from a hydraulic perspective however effluent leaving a bed in this location would be expected to move downwards relatively quickly towards fractured bedrock where rapid movement is expected towards the lake at a distance of 75-85 metres.
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 10
Page 14 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
• •
It is notable that phosphorus treatment objectives attainable by enhanced phosphorus treatment units are not considered by MECP to be low enough (alone) to be protective of the highly sensitive lake. An effluent dispersal bed in the southern end of the site as described above would provide for the maximum reduction of phosphorus migration to Loughborough Lake.
June 10, 2020 – Email from Kyle Stephenson, Hydrogeologist, Technical Support Section, Easter Region, MECP • Confirmation that he reviewed the revised, February 25, 2020 version of the Terrain Analysis completed by Groundworks Engineering. • Mr. Stephenson confirmed after reviewing the February 25, 2020 revised Terrain Analysis, that MECP is not in agreement with the Groundworks Engineering recommendation to locate the system in the northern end of the site closer to the lake. Rather, it is recommended that the system is located further from the lake in the southern part of the site for the reasons discussed in my memorandum dated June 5, 2020. • Mr. Stephenson stated the studies provided by GEL and his own assessment of conditions at the site have identified hydrogeological sensitivity (shallow fractured bedrock, Karst) that requires a precautionary approach to sewage works location / design on the subject property. As such, Mr. Stephenson noted (in his June 5, 2020 memorandum) he had supported the protective system design initially proposed by GEL (including enhanced phosphorus treatment) at the location in the southern part of the site. The southern portion of the lot is interpreted by Mr. Stephenson to be the most protective location for the system from a groundwater perspective. Public Services – Public Services was not circulated this application as an entrance permit has already been issued for this lot and there is an existing developed driveway on the property.
Public Comments At the time of writing, no formal comments have been received from the public. The intent of the public meeting is to receive comments from the public. Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from citizens on the proposed rezoning. The province has provided direction that public meetings are able to be held virtually using technology such as Zoom to obtain public input on planning applications. The public meeting for application Z-20-03 will be a virtual public meeting on June 16, 2020.
Summary Agency and planning staff have no objections to the placement of the proposed accessory structure a minimum of 150m from the front lot line, adjacent to Greenfield Road. As the accessory building (dome) will be screened by trees, there is no concern about permitting an accessory structure with a maximum height of 6.7 metres (22 feet). Agency and planning staff support maintaining a setback from the highwater mark of 45m. Agency and planning staff are not supportive of reducing the setback for the septic system to 75m, even if the proposed septic system in this location is proposed with additional phosphorus treatment. “Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 11
Page 15 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Development Services - Planning
Based on agency comments, Township planning staff are of the opinion that locating a septic system at the south-west corner of the subject property, adjacent to Greenfield Road and the neighbouring septic system on 3920 Greenfield Road, is more supportable and is more consistent with the planning policy framework that applies to the subject property. Consistent with Council’s procedural by-law, planning staff are recommending Council receive public and agency comments on this application, but defer passing a by-law until the next Council meeting to allow the applicant, staff and Council time to consider public and agency input on this application. Submitted/approved: Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services Date of Site Visits: • April 21,2020; • May 2, 2020; • May 22, 2020 Attachments: • Attachment 1 - Z-20-03 - Wright - Powerpoint Presentation • Attachment 2 - Z-20-03 (Wright) - Application – redacted • Attachment 3 - Z-20-03 (Wright) Supporting Coverletter from Applicants • Attachment 4 - Z-20-03 (Wright) - Site Plan & Proposed Septic Layout • Attachment 5 - GEL - 3898 Greenfield Terrain Analysis Report Revised FINAL • Attachment 6 - GEL Response to April 2020 Agency Comments • Attachment 7 - Z-20-03 (Wright) Photos from Applicant - Impact of Heavy April 30th, 2020 Rain • Attachment 8 - Z-20-03_CRCA Comments - March 30, 2020 • Attachment 9 - Z-20-03_MECP Comments - April 8, 2020 • Attachment 10 - Z-20-03_MECP Hydrogeologist Comments - June 5, 2020 • Attachment 11 - Z-20-03_ MECP Hydrogeologist Comments - 3898 Greenfield Rd June 10, 2020 • Attachment 12 - Z-20-03_KFLA Public Health Comments - April 8, 2020 • Attachment 13 - Z-20-03_KFLA Public Health Comments - June 9, 2020
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader” 12
Township of South Frontenac Public Meeting Z-20-03 Bruce & Denise Wright 3898 Greenfield Road, Part Lot 18, Concession 4, being Part 1 on Plan 13R19169, District of Storrington Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:00 p.m. Virtual Public Meeting Page 16 of 153
South Frontenac Council
Public Meeting Statement • The purpose of this public meeting is to hear comments on Zoning By-Law Amendment application Z-20-03. • If a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to South Frontenac Township before the by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. • If you wish to be notified of the decision of Council in respect to the application, you must submit a written request to the Clerk via email at amaddocks@southfrontenac.net. This will also entitle you to be advised of a possible Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. • Anyone may appeal the decision to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal by filing with the Clerk within 20 days of the notice of decision.
2020-06-12
Public Meeting, Z-20-03
2
Page 17 of 153
• An appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal may be filed with the Clerk of the Township not later than 20 days after the day that the notice of decision was given. The notice of appeal must set out the objection to the by-law and the reasons in support of the objection, accompanied by the required fee.
Agenda for Public Meeting • Planner reviews proposal and delivers report • Comments/Questions from Council • Comments from Applicant/Owner • Comments from the Public • Comments/Questions from Council • Close Public Meeting
Page 18 of 153
Page 19 of 153
Proposal Rezone from RW-27 to RW-45
5
Page 20 of 153
2020-06-12
•
Proposal Rezone from RW-27 to RW-45
- to permit construction of a dwelling at a minimum of 45m from the HWM
- to permit construction of a septic system at 75m from the HWM
Page 21 of 153
- to permit an accessory building in the front yard at 150m from Greenfield Road
Subject Property: 3898 Greenfield Road
Page 22 of 153
Subject Property: 3898 Greenfield Road
Standing on the driveway looking west across the ,most southerly portion of the lot adjacent to Greenfield Road.
Page 23 of 153
Looking North from Greenfield Road on southern portion of the lot.
Subject Property: 3898 Greenfield Road
Page 24 of 153
Standing on the northern portion of the lot looking Looking at the gravelled pad on the ridge that transects towards Loughborough Lake. The applicant has been the property, where the accessory building is proposed clearing trees to create the building envelop for the new house.
Subject Property: 3898 Greenfield Road
Standing at the top of bank looking south towards the ridge that crosses the subject property. Looking towards the proposed location of the tertiary treatment septic system.
Page 25 of 153
Looking at the proposed location of the tertiary treatment septic system approximately 75m from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake.
Site Plan Provided by Applicant’s Engineer
Proposed Dwelling
Proposed Location for Septic System (75m from Highwater Mark)
Highwater Mark of Loughborough Lake (At Capacity Lake Trout Lake)
Proposed Accessory Building (Dome) Existing Drainage Swale
Page 26 of 153
Neighbouring Septic System
300m setback from the High Water Mark of the Lake
Photos taken by Applicant after April 30, 2020 Heavy Rain
Page 27 of 153
Photos taken by Applicant after April 30, 2020 Heavy Rain
Page 28 of 153
Agency Comments • Cataraqui Conservation • March 20, 2020
• KFL&A Public Health • April 8, 2020 • June 9, 2020
• Ministry of Environment, Conservation & Parks • April 8, 2020
• June 10, 2020
Page 29 of 153
• June 5, 2020
Summary & Recommendation • It is recommended that South Frontenac Council defer making a decision on this application at this time to consider agency and public comments on application Z20-03. • Planning staff will bring forward a report at the July 14, 2020 Council meeting providing a further recommendation and by-law for Council consideration. Page 30 of 153
Questions and Comments • Comments/Questions from Council for the Planner • Comments from Applicant/Owner • Comments from any members of the Public • Comments/Questions from Council
Page 31 of 153
Page 32 of 153
x
Page 33 of 153
Page 34 of 153
Page 35 of 153
Page 36 of 153
Page 37 of 153
Page 38 of 153
1148!;/v
3S!U9Q
1L|8!J/V
33|‘Ll?
’A|eJe3ugs
‘sJnoqq8geu poo8 pue A1gunuJLuo:> Jno ug e/\g13e Sugeq o1 pJe/vuo; >|oo| pue ‘8J3L| e/xow o1peJ,pxe ‘uog1epossv
e>ge1 q8no.4oqq8no1 835131183eq1;o
sJeqweLu
9.12 eM
e/xgzpe ewooeq o1 uog1ue1ug
’8ugsop u|
mo 5; 1|
o
‘;;oum
Je1eM uomauepgsuooo1ug ue>ge1e/xeq Sugpunq Mosseaae pue esnoq eqa,;o; Suguuegd epeJ8 mo 1ou mM1g1eqJ,os
o
eq
‘pe1eugLue1uo3
o1e>|e; eq1/none
‘uog1e3o| 51; pue u1e1sAs andesAJegue1e Jo;suog1epueu.1Luo3eJ
epew seq oq/v\ Jeeug?ue |BJ,U3l.LlUOJ!/\U3 ue Buugq;o esuedxe em01 euo8 e/xeq em ‘|EAOJddE Jgeqa, peugeJ,qo pue moqq?geu zsesop Jno pepeluoe e/xeq e/v\ epeae; Sugpunouns Suusgxe eq1 qJ,gM ug pue|q1eq1 sJno|o3 esn mmem ‘peo3 p|eg;ueeJ9
a
LUOJ}/\1!|[q!S!/
eq1e3npeJ
01’S33J1Aq pepunouns Auedmd eq1;o e|ppgw emug BugpunqMosseaoe Jno pe3e|d e/\eq e/v
(seen, 000"; /|e1eu1gxoJddv) ‘A:uedoJd
mo ;o meg; qJ,nos eqz ug seen, 3ug1ue|d eq mmpue oue1uo S33J_L pepezuoo Apeexgee/xeq em
‘uog1euguJe1uo3
Je1eM goum Aue ezeugwue on,esnoq mo uo 8ug;oo.n;ee1s and mmem
o
0
o
‘sup, ug ued mo op 01 Sd3J,S[€UO]1!pp2
Supqea,em em Lpns sv ’eJn1n; uuez Buol$1; pue e>|e’| q8noJoqqSno1 ;o A1;/mgsues em1noqe peweeuoo pue BJBMB BJE e/v\ ‘1uud1oo; mo eanpex pue1o| 3L|13AOJdLU]o1s8ugq1 J3L|J,O euop e/xeq em ‘node; emug eq18ug/vxouo; o1 uougppe u| ’e|doed pepugw gem; pue uoue/uesuoo em e/v\
mo pge| se suog1epueLuuJo3eJ
‘U.l3|C|OJdsgq1o1 uoungos egqeuns e eugLuJe1ep 01 uodea sgsmeuv
e op 01 Buueeug?ug
ugeuel
S)|JOMpUnO.l9 peuq 3M1||‘IS3J e sv ‘1]LUJ3dSugpunq e ugelqo o1e|qe eq1ou pmo/v\ em eJo;eJeq1pue
axe‘;
q8noJoqq8no1 u1oJ;J,ueLueJgnbeJ >peqJ,es Luoog Sunsgxe eq1J,eeLu 1ou pgp J,o|Jno1eq1;;e1s
dgqsumoi
Aq pesg/xpe eJeM em ’1eJ,;eA|1Joqg'5[oz I mdvuo peoa p|eg,tueeJ9 uo1o| Sugpunq 2 peseqamd e/v
‘u.1eq1 01 JBSODe/\g| o1peJ,ueM
ueJp|gq:> e/xeq
pue ’eeJe UOJ,S3U!)|eq1 ug Bug/\g|eJe 12141 ueJp|gq:>pueJB pue
em ‘sue;d J,U3LUaJ]1BJ mo ;o ued se 3€U91UOJ;| qznog 01 em/>poJg
‘1uetupueLuv
Lum; Bug/xow eue em
Buguoz e Jo;uog1e3ggddv mo o1AJe1ueLue|ddns eq 011UE3LU sqJ3113| sgqi MEMQ sJeqwew
|puno3
pue ea11!LuLuo:) Buguuqd 3EU31UOJ;| Lnnos
:01
ozoz‘oz Nervqaa Page 39 of 153
Groundwork Engineering Limited GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER
1m .3 38
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
UNIT 640 - 654 NORRIS COURT KINGSTON, ONTARIO OFFICE (613) 634-1789
N
LOCATION PLAN .0 75
W
E
99 9 9393939.2.27.25.22.0 .5.02500 50 5 0
0m
0 .0 50
.6 11
m
9m
S
5 .7
9 9 9 96 96 6. 97 97 97. 7.0 6.7 .50.25 00 98 5 2 . 0 . 5 75 0 5 .0 0
36
m
.95
39
.750 9934..0250 9944..5750 9945..0250 9955..575 95
m LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
TP-3
98 .2 5
16.48m
TP-4
98 .50
0 1.5 10
50 98.
1.2
5
.5
0
10
98
1.0
0
10
75 98. 00 99.
NOTES: WATERLINE TAKEN FROM HOPKINS & CORMIER SURVEYING LIMITED DRAWING DATED APRIL 4, 2008
10 100 99. 7 0. 25 .00 5
5 .2 99 0 .5 99
5
1.7 10
10
100.50 75 0. 10 0 0 1. 10 5 2 1. 10 0 5 1. 10 5 7 1. 10 0 0 2. 10 5 .2 102 .50 2 10
1.5
0
100
.75
101.25
0
1.0
10
75
10
50 100.
19.00m 100
.25
.50
102
.25
.75
102
.00
100
102
5
101.7
1100.00 00. 00
0
5 101.
75
10
275.53m
278.22m
25
00
75
50
25
00
10
.75
0 10 100.25
REVISIONS
99.7 5 10
0 1.0
No.
Description
Date
ISSUED FOR REPORT
2020/01/06
REVISED AS PER COMMENTS
2020/02/24
159.67m 5
10
10
0.2
5
1.2
BENCHMARK:
5 0.2 10
No. BM
TP-5 . 75
99
DESCRIPTION SIB ON HIGH WATER ELEVATION ON NORTH WEST PROPERTY LINE
10
1.5
0
75
ELEVATION 92.46m
Client / Land Owner:
DENISE AND BRUCE WRIGHT
50
101
.75
99.75
10
TP-1 0
100.0
5 0.7
10
TP-2
.00 101
02.00 1 102.25
Project: .25 101
.25
100
83.82m
1
50 01.
3898 GREENFIELD ROAD Drawing Title:
SITE PLAN
5 1 .70 0.5 00 10
Drawn by:
GRE
LD ENFIE
RD
ONTARIO
SOUTH FRONTENAC
Checked By: Page Size: Scale: Date:
TF
Project Number:
GW-19002-26
MB 24"x36" 1:750
DEC 18, 2019
Drawing Number:
C-101 SHEET 1 of 1
Page 40 of 153
Page 41 of 153
3898 Greenfield Road
Terrain Analysis Report Revised
Prepared for: DENISE AND BRUCE WRIGHT Prepared by: Groundwork Engineering Limited Project No. GW-19002-26 Date: 25 February 2020
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 1
Page 42 of 153
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 2.0 Background ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 3.0 Site Topography ………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 4.0 Field Activity – Terrain and Surficial Soils …………………………………………………… 5 5.0 Surficial Drainage ………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 6.0 On Site Sewage Disposal …………………………………………………………………………… 6 7.
Conclusions and Recommendations……………………………………………………….. 8
8.0
Statement of Qualifications and Limitations …………………………………………… 10
APPENDIX A……………………………………………………………………………Site Plan APPENDIX B………………………………………………………………………Test Pit Logs APPENDIX C.…………………………………………………………Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX D…………………………………………………………..CAN/BNQ Certification APPENDIX E…………………………………Phosphorous Treatment Product Information
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 2
Page 43 of 153
1.0 Introduction This report presents the results of a terrain analysis conducted at 3898 Greenfield Road, Township of South Frontenac, Ontario prepared in support of a request for a zoning by-law amendment. The property can be legally described as Part of Lot 18, Concession 4, Township of South Frontenac, Storrington District. The site is one of three lots severed in January 2008 and has an area of 2.58 hectare. The property is located on the south shore of the west basin of Loughborough Lake. The purpose of the terrain analysis is to review site conditions and assess suitability for on site waste water treatment. The site will be serviced with a drilled well for potable water. Field work consisting of topographic survey, excavation of five (5) test pits, and soil sampling was undertaken by Groundwork Engineering Limited (GWEL) staff in November 2019. Representative samples were submitted to third party laboratory for grain size analyses and chemical composition to confirm suitability for on site sewage disposal systems.
2.0 Background The terrain analysis included a literature review of existing records. Loughborough Lake (West Basin) is designated by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) to be managed for a lake trout fishery. In a jointly produced MNR/Ministry of Environment (MOE) report Loughborough Lake (West Basin) has been classified as highly sensitive to further loss of oxygen and hence lake trout habitat. An environmental impact assessment (EIA) was completed July 2007 by Ontario Lake Assessments in support of the consent application for this lot. The assessment indicated the importance of mitigating any future nutrient loading, specifically phosphorous, of Loughborough Lake (West Basin). A conclusion of the EIA was that a proposed conventional leaching bed septic system could be located ≥ 300m from the lake and therefore meet the requirements of MOE and the Official Plan (OP) (March 2003) for Township of South Frontenac. A proposed septic bed location was identified in the south east corner of the lot (Figure 4 EIA). It appears that the lot was created on the premise that paragraph 5.2.8 (a) (iii) b) and d) of the OP, namely that a conventional septic system (tile bed) could be located more than 300m from the highwater mark, could be met. This led to the passing of a zoning by law amendment January 8, 2008 changing the designation of the lot from RU to RW 27. RW 27 specifically identifies that the setback of any septic system from the highwater mark or flood line of a waterbody is to be (minimum) 300m.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 3
Page 44 of 153
Survey measurements taken indicate that there is no point on the lot that is greater than 300m from the highwater mark or flood line of Loughborough Lake (West Basin). The proposed site has only 278m of separation from the high-water mark to the southern property line.
3.0 Site Topography The lake shoreline fronting this property is heavily treed and very steep rising approximately 30m. The top of the limestone ridge is approximately 30m from the water with an additional 15m at a lesser gradient to the top of the slope. There is a moderate increase in elevation toward the high point of the lot at a distance of approximately 80m from the lake. This area is well treed with a mixed deciduous forest. The property then drops in elevation from this point southerly across a scrub grass field toward Greenfield Road. There are a number of shallow swales that traverse the grass field from east to west that congregate at a single point on the western lot line (Figure 1). This is in conflict with the information presented in the EIA which indicated that all surface flow on the proposed lots was from South to North. The swales outlet into a ditch on the adjacent property formed within highly fractured exposed limestone with Karst like features (Figure 2). The presence of highly fractured limestone exposed to the surface was not identified in the EIA. The ditch travels north westerly across the neighboring property and ultimately deposits into Loughborough Lake (West Basin) approximately 150m down stream from site. The Existing Grading and Drainage Plan, drawing C-101 prepared by Groundwork Engineering Limited, dated December 18, 2019 is attached in Appendix A.
Figure 1. Surface water in swale flowing westerly
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 4
Page 45 of 153
Figure 2. Exposed fractured limestone drainage swale on west adjacent property
4.0 Field Activity – Terrain and Surficial Soils GWEL personnel were present during the excavation of five (5) test pits at strategic locations on the subject property. Test pits were excavated to depths of approximately 0.8 to 1.4 metres below present site grade. Test pits 1 and 2 were located in the grassed field in the area identified as the most likely location for a septic bed in the EIA. Overburden deposits identified in test pits 1 and 2 consisted of approximately 0.25 metres of topsoil overlying light brown silty clay, overlying fractured limestone. Bedrock was encountered 1.4 metres below grade. Ground water infiltration was reported in test pits 1 and 2 following completion of the field work. Test pits 3 and 4 were located in the moderately sloped area north of the high point on the property immediately south of the proposed house location. Overburden identified in test pits 3 and 4 consisted of approximately 0.25 metres of topsoil overlying light brown silty sand, some gravel, trace clay overlying limestone bedrock. Bedrock was encountered at depths ranging from 0.8 metres to 1.1 metres below grade. A sample was taken from the silty sand for further laboratory analysis. No ground water infiltration was reported in test pits 3 and 4 following completion of the field work. A fifth test pit was excavated in the middle of the south field towards the western boundary of the lot near the east west swale. The stratigraphy consisted of topsoil over clay overlying limestone bedrock. Heavy groundwater seepage was noted coming in on top of the limestone from 3 directions. When backfilled two (2) hours later, it was half full of water.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 5
Page 46 of 153
Test pit locations are shown on Grading and Drainage Plan drawing C-101 prepared by Groundwork Engineering Limited, dated December 19, 2019 (attached) and test pit logs are included in Appendix B.
5.0 Surficial Drainage The topography, soils and gradient determine the surficial drainage. There is a topographic feature that conveys flows from east to west across the southern portion of the property. This was not identified in the EIA. Surficial drainage will likely reflect site topography from east to west across the southern portion of the property and south to north along the northern portion of the subject property. Infiltration is expected to be poor through the silty clay overburden in the southern half of the property and will likely migrate to the highly fractured exposed limestone to the west of the site. The percolation rate of the silty clay was determined to be greater than 50 minutes/cm. Infiltration through the silty sand in the vicinity of TP 3 and 4 is most likely. Test results indicate a percolation rate in the range of 8 to 20 minutes/centimetre. Laboratory test results are attached at Appendix C. The silt content will slow the rate of infiltration. The nature of the silty sand is such that it will likely provide a phosphorous retentive A and B horizon soil material typically found to be higher in iron content which acts to bind phosphorous and contain it in the soil medium. Test results attached at Appendix C indicate concentration of iron ranging from 23000 microgram/gram to 31300 microgram/gram.
6.0 On Site Sewage Disposal The septic system on the adjacent property to the west is a raised conventional filter bed Class 4 Level I system located at the south east corner of the lot with a mantle extending northwards. Test pit observations and results of grain size analyses indicate that the predominant soil type in the southern grassed portion of the site is silty clay with a percolation rate of greater than 50 min/cm. This area would only support a raised effluent dispersal bed. Observations from test pits excavated south of the proposed house site indicate the presence of a silty sand. The depth to bedrock varies across the area. There is sufficient soil depth to support a partially raised effluent dispersal bed. Preliminary review of the proposed house plans for the lot indicate a daily design sewage flow of 2350 litres/day. This flow can be easily treated with a conventional septic tank and leaching bed treatment system provided the required setbacks are maintained. Since the 300m minimum
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 6
Page 47 of 153
setback was never achievable on this lot we suggest that the consent application could have been granted on Paragraph 5.2.8 (a) (iii) c) of the OP. This states that: Notwithstanding (ii) above, Council may consider the creation of new lots through the severance consent process in special or unique circumstances where it can be proven to the satisfaction of Council, in consultation with the MOE and MNR, that one or more of the following conditions exists: c) that new technologies in sewage disposal systems, acceptable to MOE, will be utilized resulting in no adverse effects on lake water quality; The Ontario Building Code (OBC) implemented changes to the requirements for Treatment Units as outlined in Article 8.6.2.2, which took effect January 1, 2017. These changes include the removal of Supplementary Standard SB-5 for Approved Treatment Units, and a new reference to the CAN/BNQ 3680-600 standard for certification of Level IV treatment units. There are four areas of certification; standard biological (B-I, B-II, B-III, B-IV), disinfection (D-I, D-II, DIII), phosphorous (P-I, P-II) reduction, and nitrate (N-I, N-II) reduction. The additional treatment options of disinfection, phosphorous reduction and nitrate reduction that are available in this standard, but are not currently required by the Building Code, are as follows: Fecal Coliforms or E. Coli (CFU/100 mL) (1) 50 000 200 ND (2) Table 1. Disinfection Treatment Levels
Class of Treatment D-I D-II D-III
Notes to Table: (1) Maximum concentration in CFU/100 mL based on 30-day average. (2) ND means non-detectable (median < 10 CFU/100 mL)
Class of Treatment Total Phosphorous (1), mg/L Total Nitrogen Reduction P-I 1.0 — P-II 0.30 — N-I — 50% N-II — 75% Table 2. Phosphorous and Nitrate Reduction Treatment Levels Notes to Table: (1) Maximum concentration in mg/L based on 30-day average.
Use of optimized soil conditions in the engineered Type A effluent dispersal bed should be considered as a best management practice for this site. Optimal conditions can be defined as
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 7
Page 48 of 153
calcium (<2%), iron and aluminum (>1%). This will provide natural and effective phosphorous reduction. A minimum depth of 300mm of sand is required beneath the effluent dispersal bed. Septic systems with a biological level IV (B-IV) treatment unit providing effluent quality that does not exceed maximum concentrations set out in Table 8.6.2.2 of the Ontario Building Code, namely 10mg/L of total suspended solids and 10mg/L of CBOD5 , with an enhanced Type A bed with 600mm of phosphorous retentive sand and that have received CAN/BNQ 3680-600 certification will produce an effluent that will not adversely affect the water quality of the lake. The Norweco Inc. Hydro-Kinetic®, Premier Tech Aqua Ecoflo Biofilter and Waterloo anaerobic digestor with Biofilter (CAN/BNQ certifications attached in Appendix D) provide the necessary levels of treatment to meet OBC requirements. The daily design sewage flow generated by the proposed house can be easily treated by one of the standard configurations for the certified systems from Premier Tech Aqua Ecoflo, Norweco Hydro Kinetic or Waterloo Biofilter. In accordance with the OBC the treated effluent would be dispersed through a Type A bed consisting of a minimum 300mm of clean 19mm septic stone over a 300mm layer of coarse graded sand with less than 5% fines with a percolation rate between 6 and 10 minutes/centimetre. To further enhance the phosphorous retention this sand depth could be increased to 600mm. If required additional phosphorous reduction can be provided by additional proprietary methods. The Norweco Inc. Phos-4-Fade phosphorous reduction filter was tested and certified by BNQ through their stringent 12-month test protocol, meeting CAN/BNQ 3680-600 Class P-II as well as NQ 3680-910 Class IV requirements. While satisfactorily completing this stringent test protocol, the Phos-4-Fade filter produced exceptional phosphorus reduction of 97.9%. (technical information attached in Appendix E) The Premier Tech Aqua DpEC phosphorous reducing self-cleaning unit is based on the principle of electro coagulation. The process consists of applying a low-intensity current across two aluminum electrodes submerged in the effluent. (technical information attached in Appendix E) Using low-energy electrochemistry, the patent-pending Waterloo EC-P™ phosphorous reducing unit dissolves natural iron electrodes into the wastewater. This iron reacts with phosphorus ions and precipitates out as an insoluble crystalline mineral. These iron-phosphate minerals are physically filtered out of the wastewater by the foam filter medium in the Waterloo Biofilter system. (technical information attached in Appendix E)
Conclusions and Recommendations
Loughborough Lake (West Basin) is a highly sensitive lake trout lake that is at capacity for development.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 8
Page 49 of 153
The approved building lot at 3898 Greenfield Road does not provide the required 300m minimum setback from the high-water mark of Loughborough Lake (West Basin). The Township of South Frontenac Official Plan maintains the provision that septic systems utilizing new technologies that are acceptable to the Ministry of Environment, and do not have adverse effects on lake water quality over the long term can be used within the 300 meters of the lake. Heavier clay soils are prevalent on the southern half of the property which would limit septic bed effluent dispersal to fully raised beds with imported sandy soils. Effluent leaving the sand in the raised beds would tend to migrate horizontally once it encounters the heavier clay soils. Existing topography on the southern portion of the site leads to surface drainage conveyed through shallow swales to the exposed highly fractured bedrock on the adjacent western property providing a direct route for untreated and treated effluent to affect the lake. Level IV on site waste water treatment systems approved under CAN/BNQ 3680-600 certification for use in Ontario in accordance with the Ontario Building Code are highly recommended for this site. The proposed building envelope is 50 metres from the shoreline of the lake. Soils observed in test pits approximately 80m from the shoreline of the lake indicated a silty sand with the potential to absorb phosphorous. The area would be suitable for a partially raised effluent dispersal bed. We recommend that 600mm depth of Type A sand with as high as possible concentration of iron and aluminum be used for the construction of the effluent dispersal bed. On site waste water treatment systems shall be designed, constructed, and approved by qualified personnel in accordance with the Ontario Building Code requirements. Clearance distances from controlling features such as property lines, and structures, for septic system components must be maintained. The owner shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the proprietary treatment system used for this site. The maintenance agreement is to include an annual inspection of the treatment system and sampling and analysis of effluent to ensure the treatment system is achieving minimum effluent criteria in accordance with OBC requirements. The annual inspection report is to be forwarded to the regulating authority.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 9
Page 50 of 153
Construction of a Class 4 Level IV on site waste water system with a partially raised enhanced Type A effluent dispersal bed with a minimum depth 600mm of phosphorous retentive sand located on the native silty sand 75m from the shoreline of the lake will have no adverse effects on lake water quality.
8.0
Statement of Qualifications and Limitations
The recommendations provided in this report are based on subsurface data obtained at the specific test locations only. Boundaries between zones presented on the test pit logs are often not distinct but transitional and were interpreted. Experience indicates that the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions can vary significantly between and beyond the test pit locations. For this reason, the recommendations given in this report are subject to a field verification of the subsurface soil conditions at the time of construction. We trust this report provides sufficient information for your present purposes. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further services to you, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Report Prepared by:
Tim Farrance, Engineering Technologist
Report Reviewed by:
Martin Burger, M.Eng., P.Eng.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Tel: (613)-634-1789 10
Page 51 of 153
Appendix A
Site Plan
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640, 654 Norris Ct Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Groundwork Engineering Limited GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER
1m .3 38
LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
UNIT 640 - 654 NORRIS COURT KINGSTON, ONTARIO OFFICE (613) 634-1789
N
LOCATION PLAN .0 75
W
E
99 9 9393939.2.27.25.22.0 .5.02500 50 5 0
0m
0 .0 50
.6 11
m
9m
S
5 .7
9 9 9 96 96 6. 97 97 97. 7.0 6.7 .50.25 00 98 5 2 . 0 . 5 75 0 5 .0 0
36
m
.95
39
.750 9934..0250 9944..5750 9945..0250 9955..575 95
m LOUGHBOROUGH LAKE
TP-3
98 .2 5
16.48m
TP-4
98 .50
0 1.5 10
50 98.
1.2
5
.5
0
10
98
1.0
0
10
75 98. 00 99.
NOTES: WATERLINE TAKEN FROM HOPKINS & CORMIER SURVEYING LIMITED DRAWING DATED APRIL 4, 2008
10 100 99. 7 0. 25 .00 5
5 .2 99 0 .5 99
5
1.7 10
10
100.50 75 0. 10 0 0 1. 10 5 2 1. 10 0 5 1. 10 5 7 1. 10 0 0 2. 10 5 .2 102 .50 2 10
1.5
0
100
.75
101.25
0
1.0
10
75
10
50 100.
19.00m 100
.25
.50
102
.25
.75
102
.00
100
102
5
101.7
1100.00 00. 00
0
5 101.
75
10
275.53m
278.22m
25
00
75
50
25
00
10
.75
0 10 100.25
REVISIONS
99.7 5 10
0 1.0
No.
Description
Date
ISSUED FOR REPORT
2020/01/06
REVISED AS PER COMMENTS
2020/02/24
159.67m 5
10
10
0.2
5
1.2
BENCHMARK:
5 0.2 10
No. BM
TP-5 . 75
99
DESCRIPTION SIB ON HIGH WATER ELEVATION ON NORTH WEST PROPERTY LINE
10
1.5
0
75
ELEVATION 92.46m
Client / Land Owner:
DENISE AND BRUCE WRIGHT
50
101
.75
99.75
10
TP-1 0
100.0
5 0.7
10
TP-2
.00 101
02.00 1 102.25
Project: .25 101
.25
100
83.82m
1
50 01.
3898 GREENFIELD ROAD Drawing Title:
SITE PLAN
5 1 .70 0.5 00 10
Drawn by:
GRE
LD ENFIE
RD
ONTARIO
SOUTH FRONTENAC
Checked By: Page Size: Scale: Date:
TF
Project Number:
GW-19002-26
MB 24"x36" 1:750
DEC 18, 2019
Drawing Number:
C-101 SHEET 1 of 1
Page 52 of 153
Page 53 of 153
Appendix B
Test Pit Logs
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640, 654 Norris Ct Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Page 54 of 153
RECORD OF TEST PIT TEST PIT No. 1 LOCATION 3898 Greenfield Road, Inverary Surface Elevation: 99.99 Pocket Penetrometer Description
Thickness (mm)
Total Depth (mm)
Topsoil
254
254
Light brown Silty Clay
1168.4
1422.4
End Of Testpit - 98.57 Bedrock Encountered - 98.57 Groundwater Seepage - 98.57 Project No. 19002-26 Mini-excavator Excavation Method: Logged By: Ross Lee Checked By: MB
Elevation (m)
Depth (mm)
Readings Tons/ft2 & Kg/cm2
99.74
98.57 Date Started: 2019-11-28 Date Completed: 2019-11-28 Compiled By: Ross Lee
Page 55 of 153
RECORD OF TEST PIT TEST PIT No. 2 LOCATION 3898 Greenfield Road, Inverary Surface Elevation: 100.20 Pocket Penetrometer Description
Thickness (mm)
Total Depth (mm)
Topsoil
266.7
266.7
Light brown Silty Clay
1155.7
1422.4
End Of Testpit - 98.78 Bedrock Encountered - 98.78 Groundwater Seepage at 98.78 Project No. 19002-26 Mini-excavator Excavation Method: Logged By: Ross Lee Checked By: MB
Elevation (m)
Depth (mm)
Readings Tons/ft2 & Kg/cm2
99.93
98.78 Date Started: 2019-11-28 Date Completed: 2019-11-28 Compiled By: Ross Lee
Page 56 of 153
RECORD OF TEST PIT TEST PIT No. 3 LOCATION 3898 Greenfield Road, Inverary Surface Elevation: 99.20 Pocket Penetrometer Description
Thickness (mm)
Total Depth (mm)
Topsoil
254
254
Light brown Silty Sand, some gravel, trace clay
533.4
787.4
End Of Testpit - 98.41 Bedrock Encountered - 98.41 No Groundwater Seepage Project No. 19002-26 Mini-excavator Excavation Method: Logged By: Ross Lee Checked By: MB
Elevation (m)
Depth (mm)
Readings Tons/ft2 & Kg/cm2
98.95
98.41 Date Started: 2019-11-28 Date Completed: 2019-11-28 Compiled By: Ross Lee
Page 57 of 153
RECORD OF TEST PIT TEST PIT No. 4 LOCATION 3898 Greenfield Road, Inverary Surface Elevation: 99.61 Pocket Penetrometer Description
Thickness (mm)
Total Depth (mm)
Topsoil
254
254
Silty Sand, some Clay
76.2
330.2
98.34
Light brown Silty Sand, some gravel, trace clay
787.4
1.12
98.26
End Of Testpit - 97.48 Bedrock Encountered - 97.48 No Groundwater Seepage Project No. 19002-26 Mini-excavator Excavation Method: Logged By: Ross Lee Checked By: MB
Elevation (m)
Depth (mm)
Readings Tons/ft2 & Kg/cm2
97.48 Date Started: 2019-11-28 Date Completed: 2019-11-28 Compiled By: Ross Lee
Page 58 of 153
Appendix C
Laboratory Test Results
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640, 654 Norris Ct Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Sieve Analysis (LS-602)
FINES
GRAVEL
SAND
100
Sieve Opening 37.5 mm 26.5 mm 19.0 mm 16.0 mm 13.2 mm 9.5 mm 4.75 mm 2.36 mm 1.18 mm 600 µm 300 µm 150 µm 75 µm
90
80
PERCENT PASSING
70 60
50 40 30
20
% Passing 100 96 91 91 90 88 84 79 72 62 48 35 25
10 0 0.01
0.1
1
10
100
PARTICLE SIZE, MM
Test Pit 4, Depth 44"
D60
D10
Lab No: 0040B Client: Groundwork Engineering Client Ref: GW-19002-26 Sample ID: Test Pit 4, Depth 44" Location: 3893 Greenfield Road Coefficient of Uniformity, Cu: Effective size, D10 (mm): -
Validated:
Date: 09-Dec-19
Page 59 of 153
Notes: Estimated T-time: 8 min/cm to 20 min/cm. T-time is estimated from grain size data only, in comparison to OBC 2012 SB-6, and based solely on the sample as received.
Tested: MS Date: 06-Dec-19
Page 60 of 153
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Final Report C.O.C.: G47134
REPORT No. B20-00191
Report To: Groundwork Engineering LTD 654 Norris Crt, Unit 640, Kingston Ontario K7P 2R9 Canada Attention: Martin Burger
Caduceon Environmental Laboratories 285 Dalton Ave Kingston Ontario K7K 6Z1 Tel: 613-544-2001 Fax: 613-544-2770
DATE RECEIVED:
JOB/PROJECT NO.: 19002-26 3898 Greenfield Rd
06-Jan-20
DATE REPORTED: 14-Jan-20
P.O. NUMBER:
SAMPLE MATRIX: Soil
WATERWORKS NO.
Client I.D.
Test Pit#3
Test Pit#4
Sample I.D.
B20-00191-1
B20-00191-2
Date Collected
06-Jan-20
06-Jan-20
24500 7530 31300 2700 5860
12300 67200 23000 1310 3800
Parameter
Units
R.L.
Reference Method
Date/Site Analyzed
Aluminum Calcium Iron Aluminum (Extractable) Iron (Extractable)
µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g µg/g
10 10 10 20 20
EPA 6010 EPA 6010 EPA 6010 84-011 84-011
08-Jan-20/O 08-Jan-20/O 08-Jan-20/O 13-Jan-20/R 13-Jan-20/R
R.L. = Reporting Limit Test methods may be modified from specified reference method unless indicated by an * Site Analyzed=K-Kingston,W-Windsor,O-Ottawa,R-Richmond Hill,B-Barrie
Richard Lecompte Laboratory Supervisor
The analytical results reported herein refer to the samples as received. Reproduction of this analytical report in full or in part is prohibited without prior consent from Caduceon Environmental Laboratories. Page 1 of 1.
Page 61 of 153
Appendix D
CAN/BNQ Certification
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640, 654 Norris Ct Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Page 62 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY PREMIER TECH TECHNOLOGIES LIMITÉE (PREMIER TECH AQUA) 1, avenue Premier Rivière-du-Loup (Québec) G5R 6C1 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 2 de 10
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
1338 2017-07-24 2018-10-31 ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
®
DpEC + Ecoflo Biofilter Model Treatment chain
Primary reactor with polyethylene electrocoagulation unit and Ecoflo ® biofilter
Capacity
1 DpEC unit can treat up to 2 160 l/d. Designation of Ecoflo models
Maximum hydraulic capacity (l/d)
500
1 105
1
570
1 260
1
650
1 440
1
730
1 620
1
Number of DpEC
Nomenclature of Ecoflo models
No mention = fiberglass unit. B = Concrete unit with gravity discharge. P = polyethylene unit. R = Integrated pump
Configuration:
ST = Open bottom (discharge by infiltration). STB = Watertight bottom (Gravity or pumped discharge).
Certificate Details Treatment classes Influent wastewater temperature Other
B-IV, P-II and D-I The tests specified in sections 7.2 and 7.3 were carried out with influent wastewater at a controlled temperature of 17 °C ± 1 °C. This treatment chain includes a septic tank or a primary reactor.
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 63 of 153 ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY NORWECO INC. 220 Republic Street Norwalk, Ohio 44857 USA
Page 4 of 6
CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number : Issue date : Expiry date :
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2406 2017-06-08 2018-05-30 Stand-alone wastewater treatment systems
Model Hydro-Kinetic® + phosphorus removal Capacity Model Number 1260L-P-4M 1260L-P-4T 1600L-P-4M 1600L-P-4T 1890L-P-4M 1890L-P-4T 1890L-P-3M 2270L-P-4M 2270L-P-4T 2270L-P-3M 2270L-P-4G 3020L-P-3M 3020L-P-4M 3870L-P-3M 3780L-P-4M 3780L-P-4T 4730L-P-3M 4730L-P-4M 5670L-P-3M 5670L-P-4M Model Configuration :
Material:
Treatment Class Certificate explanation
Model Designation
Capacity (liters/day)
1260L FEU
1260
1600L FEU
1600
1890L FEU
1890
2270L FEU
2270
3020L FEU
3020
3780L FEU
3780
4730L FEU
4730
5670L FEU
5670
P-3M:
Pre-treatment tank, followed by three chamber treatment tank, followed by Bio-Film Reactor tank, followed by Phos-4-Fade tank. P-4G: Four chamber HDPE treatment tank, followed by HDPE Bio-Film Reactor tank, followed by Phos-4-Fade tank. P-4M: Four chamber treatment tank, followed by Bio-Film Reactor tank, followed by Phos-4-Fade tank. P-4T: Four chamber treatment tank, followed by Bio-Film Reactor tank, alternate top seam tank, followed by Phos-4-Fade tank. Constructed using concrete or plastic tanks that conforms with the strength and watertightness requirements of Standard CAN/CSA-B66 or Standard BNQ 3680905, or equivalent acceptable to the Authority having jurisdiction. B-IV, P-II, D-I and N-I. The tests specified in articles 8.1 and 8.2 were carried out with wastewater, at a minimum controlled temperature of 11 °C ± 1 °C. Note that this treatment chain has no septic tank
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 64 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 1 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31 Stand-alone wastewater treatment systems
Model Waterloo Biofilters® Anaerobic Digester Capacity:
Waterloo Biofilter Treatment capacity (L/d)
Minimum Digester Volume (L)
Minimum InnerTubeTM Volume (L) (1)
1,100 1,600 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000
2,077 3,021 3,776 4,720 5,664 6,608 7,552 8,496 9,440 10,384 11,328 12,272 13,216 14,160 15,104 16,048 16,992 17,936 18,880
220 320 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000
(1) The “Inner tube” is the term used to describe the long corrugated pipe forcing a longer path of water in the digester. The volume of the inner tube is included in the minimum effective volume of the digester.
Designation:
AD.
Material:
Constructed using concrete, plastic, or fibreglass tank that conforms with the strength and watertightness requirements of Standard CAN/CSA-B66 or Standard BNQ 3680905, or equivalent acceptable to the Authority having jurisdiction. External or internal pump chamber. Demand or timed dosed. Single or double compartment tank. No effluent filter required. InnerTube outlet opposite tank outlet or pump. One or multiple tanks.
Dosing: Others:
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 65 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 2 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31
Waterloo Biofilter Capacity: Designation
11 16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Configuration:
SH SHFB BA BFCN BFHD BFFG
Waterloo Biofilter Treatment capacity (L/d)
Minimum Foam Filter Media Volume (m3)
Minimum Foam Filter Media Volume (ft3)
1,100 1,600 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000
1.5 2.2 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.3 7.0 7.7 8.4 9.1 9.8 10.5 11.2 11.9 12.6 13.3 14.0
54 79 99 124 148 173 198 222 247 272 297 321 346 371 396 420 445 470 494
= Shed with open-bottom. = Shed with full bottom. = Baskets in concrete tank . = Bulk filled concrete tank. = Bulk filled plastic tank. = Bulk filled fibreglass tank.
Certificate Precisions Treatment Class:
Class B-IV.
Influent Temperature:
The tests specified in articles 8.1 and 8.2 were carried out with influent wastewater, at a minimum controlled temperature of 11 °C ± 1 °C.
Others:
This treatment chain has no septic tank. The anaerobic digester is the first step of the treatment chain.
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 66 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 3 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31
Waterloo Flatbed Biofilter Flat Bed Modules (1)
Capacity: Designation
2 units of FB-800 2 units of FB-800 2 units of FB-1000 3 units of FB-800 3 units of FB-1000 2 units of FB-800 35 2 units of FB-1000 4 units of FB-1000 40 6 units of FB-800 45 6 units of FB-800 50 2 units of FB-800 55 4 units of FB-1000 6 units of FB-1000 60 8 units of FB-800 65 2 units of FB-800 70 6 units of FB-1000 2 units of FB-800 75 6 units of FB-1000 8 units of FB-1000 80 8 units of FB-800 85 2 units of FB-1000 6 units of FB-800 90 4 units of FB-1000 2 units of FB-800 95 8 units of FB-1000 10 units of FB-1000 100 FB = Flatbed with open-bottom. 11 16 20 25 30
Configuration:
Flat Bed Treatment Capacity (2) (L/d)
Minimum Foam Filter Media Volume (m3)
Minimum Foam Filter Media Volume (ft3)
1,670 1,670 2,000 2,505 3,000 3,670
2.9 2.9 3.5 4.4 5.3 6.5
104 104 125 156 187 229
4,000 5,010 5,010 5,670
7.0 8.8 8.8 10.0
250 312 312 354
6,000 6,680 7,670
10.6 11.8 13.6
375 416 479
7,670
13.6
479
8,000 8,680
14.1 15.3
500 541
9,010
15.9
562
9,670
17.1
604
10,000
17.7
625
Certificate Precisions Treatment Class:
Class B-IV.
Influent Temperature:
The tests specified in articles 8.1 and 8.2 were carried out with influent wastewater, at a minimum controlled temperature of 11 °C ± 1 °C.
Others:
This treatment chain has no septic tank. The anaerobic digester is the first step of the treatment chain. (1) The FB-800 module has treatment capacity of 835 L/day and the FB-1000 module has treatment capacity of 1,000 L/day. Other combinations of Flat Bed modules besides those listed are possible.
Page 67 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 4 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31 (2)
The Waterloo Biofilter treatment capacity of a Flat Bed system is the sum total of the Flat Bed Treatment Capacities of the Flat Bed Models used in the system. Flat Beds may be laid out in ‘parallel’, ‘series’, or combination thereof. The designation of a Flat Bed system is the total treatment capacity with the last two digits truncated. E.g. a system comprised of two FB-800 models has treatment capacity of 835 * 2 = 1,670 L/d and a designation number of 16.
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 68 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 5 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31
Model Designation AD-SH11, AD-SHFB11, AD-BA11, AD-BFCN11, AD-BFHD11, AD-BFFG11, AD-FB11
Class B-IV:
AD-SH16, AD-SHFB16, AD-BA16, AD-BFCN16, AD-BFHD16, AD-BFFG16, AD-FB16 AD-SH20, AD-SHFB20, AD-BA20, AD-BFCN20, AD-BFHD20, AD-BFFG20, AD-FB20 AD-SH25, AD-SHFB25, AD-BA25, AD-BFCN25, AD-BFHD25, AD-BFFG25, AD-FB25 AD-SH30, AD-SHFB30, AD-BA30, AD-BFCN30, AD-BFHD30, AD-BFFG30, AD-FB30 AD-SH35, AD-SHFB35, AD-BA35, AD-BFCN35, AD-BFHD35, AD-BFFG35, AD-FB35 AD-SH40, AD-SHFB40, AD-BA40, AD-BFCN40, AD-BFHD40, AD-BFFG40, AD-FB40 AD-SH45, AD-SHFB45, AD-BA45, AD-BFCN45, AD-BFHD45, AD-BFFG45, AD-FB45 AD-SH50, AD-SHFB50, AD-BA50, AD-BFCN50, AD-BFHD50, AD-BFFG50, AD-FB50 AD-SH55, AD-SHFB55, AD-BA55, AD-BFCN55, AD-BFHD55, AD-BFFG55, AD-FB55 AD-SH60, AD-SHFB60, AD-BA60, AD-BFCN60, AD-BFHD60, AD-BFFG60, AD-FB60 AD-SH65, AD-SHFB65, AD-BA65, AD-BFCN65, AD-BFHD65, AD-BFFG65, AD-FB65 AD-SH70, AD-SHFB70, AD-BA70, AD-BFCN70, AD-BFHD70, AD-BFFG70, AD-FB70 AD-SH75, AD-SHFB75, AD-BA75, AD-BFCN75, AD-BFHD75, AD-BFFG75, AD-FB75 AD-SH80, AD-SHFB80, AD-BA80, AD-BFCN80, AD-BFHD80, AD-BFFG80, AD-FB80 AD-SH85, AD-SHFB85, AD-BA85, AD-BFCN85, AD-BFHD85, AD-BFFG85, AD-FB85 AD-SH90, AD-SHFB90, AD-BA90, AD-BFCN90, AD-BFHD90, AD-BFFG90, AD-FB90 AD-SH95, AD-SHFB95, AD-BA95, AD-BFCN95, AD-BFHD95, AD-BFFG95, AD-FB95 AD-SH100, AD-SHFB100, AD-BA100, AD-BFCN100, AD-BFHD100, AD-BFFG100, ADFB100 List of recognized manufacturers for system components Concrete Precasters MACGREGOR CONCRET PRODUCTS WINONA CONCRETE & PIPE P.O. Box 142 PRODUCTS LTD. 489 Main Street West Beachburg (Ontario) K0J 1C0 Grimsby (Ontario) L3M 1T4
UNIT PRECAST (BRESLAU) LTD. 268 Woolwich Street South Breslau (Ontario) N0B 1M0
Plastic Component Manufacturers ROTH INDUSTRIES, INC. 268 Bellew Ave. South Watertown, NY 13601 USA List of recognized assemblers BOYD BROS CONCRETE 5450 Cuddy Street Osgoode (Ontario) K0A 2W0
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 69 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Page 6 de 7
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31
FLOW DIAGRAM OF WATERLOO BIOFILTER ® INFLUENT
Anaerobic Digester
Biofilter dosing pump tank
Waterloo Biofilter
EFFLUENT
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 70 of 153
ANNEX TO THE BNQ CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY WATERLOO BIOFILTER SYSTEMS INC. 143 Dennis Street Rockwood (Ontario) N0B 2K0 CAN/BNQ 3680-600/2009-05-15 Certificate number: Issue date: Expiry date:
Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies
2312 2018-05-22 2018-07-31 HISTORY Modification description
Date 2016-07-05
Issuance of certificate.
2016-07-28
Minor Corrections of different sections.
2018-05-22
Modification of certificate: Addition of Waterloo Flatbed biofilter systems
THIS ANNEX IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY.
Page 7 de 7
Page 71 of 153
Appendix E
Phosphorous Treatment Product Information
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640, 654 Norris Ct Kingston, ON K7P 2R9
Page 72 of 153
The Waterloo EC-P Permanently and cost-effectively removes 90-99% of phosphorus from septic systems by mimicking natural iron-phosphate mineralization soil processes.
Available upgrade for all Waterloo Biofilter advanced wastewater treatment systems
Excess phosphorus in freshwater lakes can: Limit Recreation Activities such as Swimming, Boating, and Fishing Phosphorus is a nutrient naturally found in human wastewater. Excess phosphorus in surface waters can result in algae blooms and lake eutrophication. Not only can this be a nuisance and interfere with the enjoyment of lakes - but serious health and ecosystem problems can result due to blue-green algae toxins and reduced oxygen levels that fish and other organisms rely on.
Lower Property Values by Impairing Quality of Lake Water Lower Dissolved Oxygen Levels and Reduce Fish Populations Produce Toxic Algae that is Harmful to Humans and Wildlife
Page 73 of 153
How It Works Using low-energy electrochemistry, the patent-pending Waterloo EC-P™ dissolves natural iron electrodes into the wastewater. This iron reacts with phosphorus ions and precipitates out as an insoluble crystalline mineral. These iron-phosphate minerals are physically filtered out of the wastewater by the foam filter medium in the Waterloo Biofilter system, or by sand or soil in conventional septic systems – preventing the phosphorus from reaching the natural environment.
The EC-P electrode is installed in the septic tank or pump tank
Septic Tank
The phosphorus is retained as crystalline minerals in the treatment unit or drainfield
Drainfield
Waterloo EC-P Benefits Does not create additional sludge No chemical addition required Does not affect pH Works with filtration-based treatment units, sand, or soil Residential and commercial applications
For more information:
Phosphorus is permanently removed, not just separated as a sludge Low energy, less than $50/year Typical electrode life of 2-3 years Can easily be retrofitted Compact and easy to install
www.waterloo-biofilter.com 1-866-366-4329 info@waterloo-biofilter.com
Page 74 of 153
PHOS-4-FADE
The Phos-4-Fade filter components are listed, licensed, and/or certified by each of the following agencies/organizations.
Today’s Answer for the Protection of Tomorrow’s Environment
®
Page 75 of 153
PHOS-4-FADE® PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FILTER A REVOLUTIONARY DESIGN THAT EMPLOYS PROPRIETARY ADSORPTIVE FILTRATION MEDIA TO EFFICIENTLY REMOVE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS FROM THE EFFLUENT OF ANY ONSITE WATERWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM The revolutionary Phos-4-Fade phosphorus removal filter is a patented, non-mechanical component
Total Phosphorus Levels 7.06 mg/L
that can be easily installed as part of any onsite wastewater treatment system. The Phos-4-Fade filter significantly reduces total phosphorus in the effluent to levels that protect local waterways, while meeting or exceeding the most stringent regulations. The
5.82 mg/L
92.4% Phosphorus Removal
97.9% Phosphorus Removal
Phos-4-Fade filter was tested and certified by the Bureau de Normalisation du Quebec (BNQ) through their stringent 12 month test protocol, meeting CAN/BNQ 3680-600 Class P-II as well as NQ 3680-910 Class IV requirements. Flow enters the inlet chamber of the Phos-4Fade filter where it then moves downward and
0.15 mg/L After Hydro-Kinetic Treatment System
0.44 mg/L After Septic Tank 6 Months Data
1 mg/L 1 mg/L 0.30 mg/L BNQ Standards
Phos-4-Fade® Filter Effluent Treatment System Influent
CAN/BNQ 3680-600 Std. Class P-I
NQ 3680-910 Std. Class IV
CAN/BNQ 3680-600 Std. Class P-II
passes into the media chamber through an array of transfer ports. Media support channels direct flow beneath the media where evenly spaced apertures provide uniform dispersal of the flow. Progressively sized layers of primary filtration media further distribute the flow to the adsorptive media layer. As the flow passes through the adsorptive media, final polishing takes place as phosphorus adheres to the porous media surfaces. THE PHOS-4-FADE FILTER PROTECTS WATER RESOURCES FROM HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS BY REMOVING PHOSPHORUS FROM WASTEWATER STREAMS. ALGAL BLOOMS ARE OVERGROWTHS OF ALGAE IN WATER THAT CAN PRODUCE TOXINS HARMFUL TO HUMANS AND AQUATIC LIFE. FURTHER, THE DECAY OF ALGAE RESULTS IN OXYGEN DEPLETION AND EUTROPHICATION OF WATER RESOURCES. THE SIGNIFICANT PRESENCE OF NUTRIENTS SUCH AS NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE OUTBREAK OF ALGAL BLOOMS. REDUCING PHOSPHORUS LEVELS IN FLOWS LEADING TO WATER RESOURCES IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO ELIMINATE ALGAL BLOOMS. THE PHOS-4-FADE FILTER, COMBINED WITH AN EFFECTIVE NITROGEN REDUCING ONSITE TREATMENT SYSTEM, CAN CONSIDERABLY REDUCE THE OCCURRENCE OF ALGAL BLOOMS.
The Phos-4-Fade filter can be quickly and easily installed behind any onsite wastewater treatment system. The innovative adsorptive media technology begins working immediately upon start-up. Completely non-mechanical, the filter requires no electricity and operates continuously with minimal maintenance. A single riser extends to grade from the tank to allow inspection and service of the filter contents. The Phos-4-Fade filter is user friendly, easy to install and maintain, and provides effective total phosphorus removal for any onsite wastewater treatment system.
Progress Through Service Since 1906 We engineer, manufacture, install and maintain advanced water and wastewater treatment technologies for residential properties, communities and commercial properties that are not connected to sewer lines. Norweco treatment systems are in service all over the world. 220 Republic Street Norwalk, Ohio, U.S.A. 44857-1156 PH: 419.668.4471 FAX: 419.663.5440 www.norweco.com
Norweco®, Norweco.com®, Singulair®, Modulair®, Travalair®, Singulair Green®, Ribbit Rivet®, Hydro-Kinetic®, Hydro-Kinetic Bio-Film Reactor®, Evenair®, Lift-Rail®, Microsonic®, Bio-Dynamic®, Bio-Sanitizer®, Bio-Neutralizer®, Bio-Kinetic®, Bio-Static®, Bio-Gem®, Bio-Max®, Bio-Perc®, Blue Crystal®, Phos-4-Fade®, Enviro-C®, ClearCheck®, ChemCheck®, Tri-Max®, Hydra-Max®, Service Pro®, MCD®, TNT®, WASP®, Grease Buster® and “BUSTER” logo are all registered trademarks of Norwalk Wastewater Equipment Company, Inc. © MMXVII NORWECO
Page 76 of 153
PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FILTER
OWNER’S MANUAL INTRODUCTION
FEATURES AND ADVANTAGES
The Phos-4-Fade phosphorus removal filter is a patented, non-mechanical component that significantly reduces total phosphorus in water or wastewater flows and prevents harmful algal blooms. It is a sound investment that protects you and the environment. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with the contents of this manual.
All Phos-4-Fade filter tanks are constructed of reinforced precast concrete or high density polyethylene (HDPE). Internal walls and baffles are cast-in-place or integrally molded to insure uniformity and strength. Risers and covers are either precast concrete, HDPE or heavy duty, glass-filled polypropylene. All components that will contact the wastewater are constructed entirely of molded plastic, precast concrete or ceramic material.
HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS Developed to serve homes and small businesses beyond the reach of city sewers, the patented Phos-4-Fade phosphorus removal filter utilizes proprietary adsorptive filtration media for the reduction of total phosphorus in liquid flows to levels that meet or exceed the most stringent environmental regulations. Incoming liquid from an upstream treatment or collection system enters the inlet chamber of the Phos-4-Fade filter. Flow then moves downward and passes into the media chamber through an array of transfer ports. Media support channels direct flow beneath the media where evenly spaced apertures provide uniform dispersal of the liquid. Progressively sized layers of primary and secondary filtration media evenly distribute the flow to the adsorptive media layer. As the flow passes through the proprietary adsorptive media, final polishing takes place as orthophosphate ionically bonds to the porous media surfaces. The adsorptive filtration media is highly porous and provides ample surface area to insure effective reduction or elimination of total phosphorus. The innovative Phos-4-Fade phosphorus removal filter reliably protects you, your property and the environment.
The phosphorus removal process begins as the primary and secondary filtration media layers entrap solids from the liquid flow. As flow passes through the adsorptive filtration media layer, phosphorus attaches to the surface of the Phos-4-Fade media. The adsorptive filtration media begins working immediately upon start-up to provide for instant and effective phosphorus removal. The Phos-4-Fade filter can be easily installed as part of any onsite water or wastewater treatment system. The filter requires no electricity and operates continuously with minimal maintenance.
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The Phos-4-Fade filter successfully completed the stringent 12 month testing protocols outlined in CAN/BNQ 3680-600 and NQ 3680-910 following the Hydro-Kinetic system. The Hydro-Kinetic system with Phos-4-Fade filter is certified by BNQ to Class P-II requirements of CAN/BNQ 3680-600 with an average effluent total phosphorus of 0.15 mg/L. In addition, the Hydro-Kinetic system with Phos-4-Fade filter meets the Class IV requirements of NQ 3680-910 with an average effluent total phosphorus of 0.14 mg/L.
Page 77 of 153 PHOS-4-FADE MEDIA The primary and secondary filtration media layers precondition the flow by removing solids and promoting the initial removal of phosphorus. Progressively sized particles provide uniform hydraulic and organic loading to the adsorptive media layer. The proprietary adsorptive filtration media is a ceramic material with an extremely porous surface. Phosphorus adheres to the porous surface of the media as flow moves through the adsorptive media layer. Final polishing of the effluent occurs as the orthophosphate ionically bonds to the adsorptive media surface for safe and effective removal from the liquid.
NO OWNER MAINTENANCE The Phos-4-Fade filter should be inspected and serviced by a qualified service provider, therefore, no owner maintenance is required during the warranty period. The frequency of media replacement depends on system use. The local distributor will inspect the system during the warranty period to determine if media replacement is required. Media replacement will normally be required at two to five year intervals. A properly licensed solids vacuum service must be used for removal and disposal of filtration media. The solids vacuum service should consult with local authorities to determine the proper disposal method of the exhausted adsorptive media. Contact your local distributor for complete instructions prior to pumping the Phos-4-Fade filter. NOTE: Make sure the system is refilled to capacity with clean water after pumping.
ONE YEAR WARRANTY & LIFETIME EXCHANGE The Phos-4-Fade filter components are backed by a one year limited warranty and lifetime exchange program. The Phos-4-Fade filter media is warranted to be free from defects in material and workmanship, under normal use and service, for a period of one year from the date of purchase. The one year limited warranty is included in the original purchase price of every Phos-4-Fade filter. The comprehensive lifetime exchange program offers owners a lifetime of protection. Owners may purchase replacement media at a prorated cost. If the media fails, do not attempt any type of repair. Unauthorized tampering or repair will void important provisions of the limited warranty. The local, licensed distributor or service center has detailed warranty information and should be contacted for service or replacement instructions.
WARRANTY REGISTRATION A Warranty Registration Card was included with the Phos-4-Fade filter before it was shipped from the factory. If this card has not been returned to Norweco, complete and mail it immediately. If it is not returned within thirty days of the installation date, the one year limited warranty and lifetime exchange program will begin on the date of component shipment from the factory. Remove the Phos-4-Fade filter system record card and store it in a safe location with this Owner’s Manual for future reference.
SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICE RECORD For your reference, please document service performed on the following chart:
DATE
DESCRIPTION
DISTRIBUTED LOCALLY BY:
220 REPUBLIC STREET NORWALK, OHIO, USA 44857-1156 TELEPHONE (419) 668-4471 FAX (419) 663-5440 www.norweco.com Norweco®, Norweco.com®, Singulair®, Modulair®, Travalair®, Singulair Green®, Ribbit Rivet®, Hydro-Kinetic®, Hydro-Kinetic Bio-Film Reactor®, Evenair®, Lift-Rail®, Microsonic®, Bio-Dynamic®, Bio-Sanitizer®, Bio-Neutralizer®, Bio-Kinetic®, Bio-Static®, Bio-Gem®, Bio-Max®, Bio-Perc®, Blue Crystal®, Phos-4-Fade®, Enviro-C®, ClearCheck®, ChemCheck®, Tri-Max®, Hydra-Max®, Service Pro®, MCD®, TNT®, WASP®, Grease Buster® and “BUSTER” logo® are registered trademarks of Norwalk Wastewater Equipment Company, Inc. ©MMXVII NORWECO, INC. / REV. 05/2017
Page 78 of 153
Page 79 of 153
Page 80 of 153
13 April 2020 Claire Dodds Director of Development Services, MCIP, RPP Township of South Frontenac Box 100, Sydenham ON K0H 2T0 Re: Z-20-03 Wright Zoning Bylaw Amendment Dear Claire, Groundwork Engineering Limited (GEL) has reviewed the responses by the Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks (MECP), Kingston Frontenac Lennox and Addington Public Health (KFLA) and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) with regards to the terrain analysis report completed by GEL which was submitted with the zoning bylaw amendment for 3898 Greenfield Road. In the report dated 28 February 2020, GEL provides justification for the location of a proposed Level IV wastewater treatment with enhanced phosphorous reduction 75m from the highwater line of Loughborough Lake West Basin. KFLA and MECP have responded that the maximum distance available from the lot to Loughborough Lake is the only permissible location for a wastewater treatment system. CRCA provided a similar response. That distance is approximately 230m. It appears that no consideration has been given to the fact that there is exposed fractured limestone exhibiting karst-like characteristics on the adjoining property only 50m downgradient of the approved location for the effluent dispersal bed. As discussed in a previous email this site and case must be examined on its own merits. The proximity of the exposed fractured limestone bedrock leads one to believe that the receiver of treated effluent for this site is not restricted to just the surface waters of Loughborough Lake. The potential effects on groundwater and neighbouring drinking water wells may be more significant than any impact to Loughborough Lake. After a telephone discussion with Gord Mitchell at KFLA Public Health on the afternoon of 8 April 2020, I was led to believe that the Township of South Frontenac and MECP have stated that the exact location of the effluent dispersal bed on the lot is the responsibility of KFLA Public Health. Our understanding is that KFLA authority rests within the confines of the Ontario Building Code (OBC). The OBC indicates that the effluent dispersal field must be 15m from the highwater mark of a lake. Since the Township has a more stringent bylaw in place, KFLA must abide by that.
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9 Tel: (613)-634-1789
www.groundengineer.ca Page |1
Page 81 of 153
We understand that the Township may have the ability to request the services of a peer review of the GEL terrain analysis report by a County of Frontenac designated consultant to determine if indeed the optimum location for the effluent dispersal bed is as recommended in the MECP, KFLA and CRCA responses. If this is the case, we respectfully request that a peer review be conducted without delay. We look forward to working with you to determine a solution. I am confident that this unique set of circumstances can be dealt with appropriately and take the concerns of all parties into consideration. Should you require further information, or have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Martin Burger M.Eng., P.Eng. cc:
via email Bruce and Denise Wright via email Jon Orpana, Victor Castro, MECP via email Gord Mitchell, KFLA Public Health via email Andrew Schmidt, CRCA
GEOTECHNICAL ● CIVIL ● STORMWATER ● ONSITE WASTEWATER Unit 640-654 Norris Court, Kingston, ON K7P 2R9 Tel: (613)-634-1789
www.groundengineer.ca Page |2
Page 82 of 153
Pictures Taken at 3898 Greenfield Road After Heavy Rain on April 30, 2020
Figure 1. View of Proposed Building Site May 1, 2020
Figure 2. View of Proposed Septic System Location May 1, 2020
Page 83 of 153
Figure 3. Runoff and Standing Water South Field, May 1, 2020
Figure 4. Standing Water South Field and Neighbouring Septic, May 1, 2020
Page 84 of 153
Figure 5. Runoff from South Field, May 1, 2020
Figure 6. Runoff from South Field to Lake, May 1, 2020
Page 85 of 153
Figure 7. Runoff from South Field to Lake, May 2, 2020
Page 86 of 153
March 30, 2020
File: ZBL/FRS/51/2020
Sent by E-mail Ms. Angela Maddocks, Clerk c/o Department of Development Services Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, Ontario K0H 2T0
Dear Ms. Maddocks: Re:
Application for Zoning By-law Amendment Z-20-03 (Wright) Part of Lot 18, Concession 4, 3898 Greenfield Road Township of South Frontenac (District of Storrington) Waterbody: Loughborough Lake (west basin)
Staff of Cataraqui Conservation have reviewed the above-noted re-zoning application and provide the following comments for consideration by the Township. Cataraqui Conservation recommends deferral of application Z-20-03 based on our consideration for natural hazard, natural heritage, and water quality and quantity protection policies. The purpose of the proposal is to rezone a 6.5 acre lot from the special Waterfront Residential (RW 27) zone to the special Waterfront Residential (RW ##) zone to reduce the setback for a sewage system from 300 metres to 75-85 metres from the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake, and to allow a storage building to be constructed approximately 100 metres from Greenwood Road. Site Description The subject property is located along the southern shoreline of the west basin of Loughborough Lake along Greenfield Road. The topography of the site can be characterized as rising up quickly from the shoreline, then more gently rising in a southerly direction toward the road.
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 87 of 153 Page 2 of 3
The west basin of Loughborough Lake has been designated as a highly sensitive Lake Trout lake by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). This designation is recognized within the Official Plan for South Frontenac Township. Discussion The main interests of Cataraqui Conservation with respect to this application are the avoidance of natural hazards associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake (e.g. flooding and erosion), and the protection of the lake’s water quality. Natural Hazards Flooding: For Loughborough Lake, the regulatory flood plain has been established as elevation 125.1 metres geodetic. Section 4.1.3 of the CRCA’s Environmental Planning Policy recommends a 15 metre horizontal setback from the regulatory flood plain to account for variations in the regulatory flood plain elevation, changes over time in the anticipated extent of the regulatory flood plain, and situations such as debris or ice jams that may affect flood levels. Based upon the information provided with the application and a review of CRCA mapping, staff have concluded that the proposed development will be greater than 15 metres from the regulatory flood plain of Loughborough Lake. Erosion: The CRCA’s Environmental Planning Policy defines the erosion hazard limit as the sum of an allowance for toe erosion, a stable slope allowance of 3(h):1(v) for till shorelines and a minimum access allowance of 6 metres. Based upon the information provided with the application and a review of relevant mapping data, staff have concluded that the proposed development will be located outside of the erosion hazard limit. Water Quality As noted above, the west basin of Loughborough Lake has been designated as a highly sensitive Lake Trout lake by MECP. This designation is recognized in the Township of South Frontenac’s Official Plan which states: “Development is one of the factors which may reduce the ability of a lake to maintain a healthy self-sustaining Lake Trout population by adding nutrients (phosphorous and others) which may negatively impact water quality, thereby reducing the Lake Trout habitat.” The applicant is proposing to install a tertiary sewage system approximately 75-85 metres from the highwater mark of the lake. It is unclear as to the actual distance being proposed as the application states 85 metres and the proposed layout sketch suggests 75 metres. Staff recommend that the applicant be requested to verify the proposed distance between the proposed sewage system and the highwater mark of Loughborough Lake.
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 88 of 153 Page 3 of 3
In addition, staff are concerned that the proposal does not seek to maximize the distance between Loughborough Lake and the sewage system. In the opinion of staff, the water setback for a sewage system on a highly sensitive Lake Trout lake should be maximized regardless of the type of sewage system employed. However, staff recognize the experience of the MECP in these matters and will defer to MECP on this point. Staff recommend that the Township consult MECP with respect to the appropriate setback allowance for the sewage system. Recommendation Staff recommend deferral of application Z-20-03 based on the discussion above in consideration for natural hazards, natural heritage and water quality and quantity protection policies. Regulatory Requirements Cataraqui Conservation, under Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, regulates development within 15 metres of a flood plain and within 15 metres of the top of valley. Staff note that the proposed development is not located within an area that is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06. Please notify this office of any decision made by the Committee of Adjustment with regard to this application. If you have any questions about these comments, please contact the undersigned at (613) 546-4228 extension 244 or by e-mail to aschmidt@crca.ca. Yours truly,
Andrew Schmidt
Andrew Schmidt Supervisor, Development Review /as c.c.
Bruce & Denise Wright (via e-mail) Claire Dodds, Township of South Frontenac (via e-mail) Michelle Hannah, Township of South Frontenac (via e-mail) Jon Orpana, Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (via e-mail)
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 89 of 153
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs
Environmental Assessment Branch
Direction des évaluations environnementales
1st Floor 135 St. Clair Avenue W Toronto ON M4V 1P5 Tel.: 613 548 6918 Fax.: 613 548-6908
Rez-de-chaussée 135, avenue St. Clair Ouest Toronto ON M4V 1P5 Tél. : 613 548-6918 Téléc. : 613 548-6908
By email only April 8, 2020 Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0
Attention: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services, MCIP, RPP Email: cdodds@southfrontenac.net
Dear Ms. Dodds: Re:
Zoning Amendment Application Z-20-03- (Wright) Loughborough Lake West Basin
I have reviewed the application noted above and supporting documentation and offer the following comments. Loughborough Lake has been identified by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry as a cold water lake trout fishery; managed for lake trout and is currently classified by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks as “at capacity” for development. While this designation does not preclude responsible development on existing lots of record it should be done in such a way that minimizes impact to these sensitive surface water features such as maintaining a setback that is back as far as reasonably possible and minimizing lot coverage by extra structures etc. which increases the permeability of lots and minimizes surface runoff and hardening of the landscape.
Page 90 of 153
It is understood that the original severance that created the subject lands in question and neighbouring lots were created with the intent to accommodate a septic tile field at 300 meters from the high watermark of Loughborough Lake as inspected by the Public Health Inspector from the local health unit at the time. Subject to further examination we understand that it has been established that the lot as it exists falls slightly short of being able to accommodate the 300 m setback. We understand that the current owners supported by a terrain analysis wish to establish a septic envelope closer to approx. 75 m from the high watermark of the lake and using a tertiary treatment system as opposed to a conventional septic tile field. In conversation with the Public Health Inspector we understand that he still asserts that there is an envelope that can accommodate a septic tile field installation with imported fill as far back from the high watermark that approaches 300 m. This ministry is of the opinion that we would support a location as far back from the high watermark as possible and as close to 300 m setback as possible in addition we fully support installation of the tertiary treatment system which will go further to protect the water quality of Loughborough Lake. We agree that through this approach, if implemented would not result in any increase in impact to the water quality of Loughborough Lake. We have no further comments on this application at this time. Regards,
Jon K. Orpana Environmental Planner & Environmental Assessment Coordinator Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Kingston Regional Office Environmental Assessment Branch PO Box 22032, 1259 Gardiners Road Kingston, Ontario K7M 8S5 Phone: (613) 548-6918 Fax: (613) 548-6908 Email: jon.orpana@ontario.ca
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs
Eastern Region 1259 Gardiners Road, Unit 3 Kingston ON K7P 3J6 Phone: 613.549.4000 or 1.800.267.0974
Région de l’Est 1259, rue Gardiners, unité 3 Kingston (Ontario) K7P 3J6 Tél: 613 549-4000 ou 1 800 267-0974
Page 91 of 153
230,
MEMORANDUM
230,
TO:
Victor Castro Supervisor Technical Support Section, Water Resources Unit Eastern Region
FROM:
Kyle Stephenson Hydrogeologist Technical Support Section Eastern Region
RE:
Residential Sewage System on At-Capacity Lake Trout Lake (Loughborough Lake) 3898 Greenfield Road Township of South Frontenac, Ontario
June 5, 2020
I have reviewed the following documents related to the proposed residential sewage system at 3898 Greenfield Road in the Township of South Frontenac:
Report entitled “Environmental Impact Assessment, An Evaluation of a Parcel of Land on Part of Lot 18, Concession 4, Township of South Frontenac, Storrington District, Loughborough Lake (West Basin) for Three Consent Applications” completed by Ontario Lake Assessments (OLA) and dated July 2007; and,
Report entitled “3898 Greenfield Road, Terrain Analysis Report” completed by Groundwork Engineering Limited (GEL) and dated January 10, 2020.
I reviewed these reports to provide an opinion on the best location for an on-site residential sewage system at 3398 Greenfield Road (the “site”) in order to minimize any impact to Loughborough Lake. Loughborough Lake is highly sensitive to phosphorus inputs from sewage systems because phosphorus is a key control on the ecosystem that supports the Lake Trout population. Highly sensitive lakes are considered to be “at-capacity” in terms of development and the creation of new single lots with lakeshore frontage are discouraged unless it can be demonstrated that the development will not cause negative impacts on the lake. Under certain circumstances, new single lots with lakeshore frontage can be developed if the conventional septic system is located greater than 300 metres from the high-water mark for the lake. The consent application for the site was granted on the basis that a conventional septic system would be located greater than 300 metres from the lake roughly in the southeastern end of the site. GEL completed a Terrain Analysis for the site and provided the following observations, conclusions and recommendations:
Page 92 of 153 2 of 5
There are drainage swales running in an east-west orientation across the grass field in the southern end of the site near the approved septic system location. The swales outlet to a depression / ditch formed within highly fractured exposed limestone with Karst-like features on the adjacent property to the west. The ditch travels to the northwest where it intersects Loughborough Lake approximately 150 metres west of the site. I understand that GEL observed running water in this ditch resulting from groundwater discharge roughly 75 metres west of the site.
GEL excavated two test pits in the southern portion of the site and found topsoil overlying silty clay overlying fractured limestone bedrock at 1.4 metres below ground surface (mbgs). Groundwater was observed infiltrating into the test pits at the bedrock surface.
GEL excavated one test pit in the middle of the grass field near the east-west swale and found topsoil overlying clay overlying limestone bedrock. Heavy groundwater seepage was observed flowing into the test pit and 2 hours after excavating the test pit, it was observed to be half full of water.
GEL excavated two test pits in an area approximately 85 metres from the lake in the northern part of the site and found topsoil overlying silty sand with some gravel and trace clay overlying limestone bedrock at 0.8 and 1.1 mbgs. Groundwater was not observed in these test pits.
GEL interprets that groundwater infiltration in the southern end of the property will be poor (slow) through the silty clay overburden. GEL concludes that sewage effluent leaving the sand in a fully raised bed in the southern end of the property would migrate in groundwater horizontally in the native clayey soils and then flow towards the highly fractured bedrock depression / ditch west of the site. GEL expresses concern that this pathway would provide a direct route for effluent to reach the lake.
GEL interprets that effluent infiltration in the silty sand in the northern end of the property will be faster and that the sand will likely provide some phosphorus retention. Shallow groundwater is expected to move from south to north on the northern end of the property.
Overall, GEL recommends that enhanced phosphorus treatment with a partially raised effluent dispersal bed should be installed in the northern end of the site approximately 75 – 85 metres from the lake. GEL indicates that total phosphorus in effluent of 0.3 mg/L can be achieved. GEL further recommends using sand having high iron and aluminum concentrations for the effluent dispersal bed to enhance phosphorus retention.
I have the following comments for your consideration:
The site is located in a sensitive hydrogeological setting having less than 2 metres of overburden overlying fractured bedrock of the Gull River Formation. The site is sensitive because groundwater contaminants originating at / near
Page 93 of 153 3 of 5
surface can reach fractured bedrock and then migrate quickly in fractured bedrock aquifers with limited attenuation.
Exposed Karst bedrock has been observed on the adjacent property to the west of the site. Karst landscapes are caused mainly by chemical erosion of bedrock by acidic surface water and groundwater over a substantial time span. Chemical leaching of these mainly sedimentary carbonate rocks creates enhanced permeability. Karst landscapes occur in the upper tens of metres of exposed or thinly buried bedrock. This results in conduit-style groundwater flow and greater connectivity between surface waters, sinking streams and groundwater aquifers (Brunton, 2013).
The presence of Karst associated with the limestone bedrock increases the hydrogeological sensitivity of the site / area because water entering solution enhanced fractures (Karst) can move even more rapidly than in fractures which have not been enlarged by dissolution / erosion. Generally speaking, contaminants present in the groundwater would be expected to undergo limited attenuation in highly fractured / Karst aquifers. Currently there is limited information / research regarding the retention of phosphorus in fractured bedrock (and Karst) aquifers.
Mapping from the Ontario Geological Survey indicates that the entire site is underlain by inferred or potential Karst. As such, there is the potential for rapid groundwater flow at any location on the site once groundwater migrates through thin overburden (soil) and reaches the bedrock surface.
Groundwater contaminants generated at the site (e.g. dissolved phosphorus from the sewage system) are likely to move towards the lake which acts as a local shallow groundwater discharge point. As discussed above, Loughborough lake is a highly sensitive lake. Given the likely presence of Karst underlying the entire site and the potential for rapid groundwater flow towards the lake, a precautionary approach should be applied to the sewage works location and design.
I conducted a site visit on Friday May 22, 2020 attended by staff from the ministry, the township and the local health unit. During the site visit I observed the highly fractured Karst bedrock feature at surface on the property just west of the site. I did not observe surface water in the southern end of the site or surface water flow towards (or within) the Karst feature at the western site property boundary.
I also observed an existing raised bed septic system effluent dispersal bed in the southeast corner of the adjacent property to the west of the site. The performance of this existing bed is a good indicator of the probable performance of a bed in the southeastern end of the site given the similar location, soils and hydraulic loading. This bed was inspected by the ministry and Health Unit staff and the hydraulic function of the bed appeared to be adequate such that there were no effluent seeps (breakouts) from the bed and previous seeps were not evident.
Page 94 of 153 4 of 5
In terms of shallow groundwater movement, effluent leaving a raised effluent dispersal bed in the southern part of the site (near Test Pits 1 and 2) would likely move through roughly 1 metre of unsaturated silty clay soil (based on observations during test pit excavation) before reaching fractured bedrock and the shallow groundwater table. Based on the observation of groundwater at / near the bedrock surface in all three of the test pits excavated in the southern end of the site, the bedrock does not appear to be so highly permeable / fractured that it rapidly drains groundwater at the overburden / bedrock interface towards the Karst feature west of the site (or downwards into bedrock). It may be that the Karst is less well developed in this area with the bedrock surface under the cover of slightly thicker and lower permeability soils. If the fractured bedrock acted to promote rapid drainage of the area towards the Karst feature (or downwards), the observation of the test pit in the grass field (and excavated to the bedrock surface) being half full of water (as described by GEL) would not be expected.
The low hydraulic conductivity in clayey soils in the southern portion of the site would likely promote slow groundwater movement until reaching a unit with higher hydraulic conductivity. Shallow groundwater flow in the southern area of the site is likely influenced by fractured bedrock / Karst in the area, and as discussed above, once groundwater reaches permeable bedrock, flow would be expected to be rapid towards the lake.
A raised effluent bed located in the southeast corner of the property would maximize the distance from the sensitive lake (>250 meters) thereby providing the greatest potential for attenuation of septic system effluent. The clayey soils in this area of the site are expected to promote slow groundwater flow which may provide for additional phosphorus retention in the native soils. The septic system should be installed according to Ontario Building Code requirements to ensure no effluent “breakout” to surface. Based on my discussions with Health Unit staff and based on my observation of a functioning raised effluent dispersal bed to the west of the site, a properly functioning raised bed should be viable in the southern area of the site. As a result of the sensitive hydrogeological conditions associated with Karst / fractured bedrock underlying the entire site and given the uncertainty regarding the degree of connection to the Karst feature exposed at surface west of the site, I recommend that enhanced phosphorus treatment and optimum imported soils in the engineered effluent dispersal bed are installed as discussed by GEL on pages 7 and 8 of their report.
The location recommended by GEL in the northern end of the site has thin soils with higher hydraulic conductivity above an area underlain by inferred Karst bedrock. These soils are well drained given that no groundwater was encountered during test pit excavation which suggests permeable bedrock underlies the soils in this area. A bed in this location would operate better from a hydraulic perspective however effluent leaving a bed in this location would be expected to move downwards relatively quickly towards fractured bedrock where rapid movement would be expected to be towards the lake at a distance of 75 – 85 metres. It is notable that phosphorus treatment objectives attainable by enhanced phosphorus treatment units are not considered by the ministry to be low enough (alone) to be protective of the highly sensitive lake.
Page 95 of 153 5 of 5
An effluent dispersal bed in the southern end of the site as described above would provide for the maximum reduction of phosphorus migration to Loughborough Lake.
Ongoing monitoring and maintenance of the sewage works is required to ensure proper function in the long term.
Please let me know if you would like to further discuss these comments.
K. Stephenson, M.Sc., P.Eng. KMS/FC ec:
G. Mitchell, KFL&A Public Health Unit C. Dodds, Township of South Frontenac S. Dick, MECP
c:
File GW 04 05 FR SF (3898 Greenfield Road, Loughborough Lake) KMS
Reference: Brunton, F.R., Karst and Hazards Lands Mitigation: Some Guidelines for Geological and Geotechnical Investigations in Ontario Karst Terrains, Earth Resources and Geoscience Mapping Section, Ontario Geological Survey, Technical Report, December 2013.
Page 96 of 153 From: Stephenson, Kyle (MECP) [mailto:Kyle.Stephenson@ontario.ca] Sent: June-10-20 2:43 PM To: Claire Dodds cdodds@southfrontenac.net Cc: ‘Mitchell, Gord’ Gord.Mitchell@kflaph.ca; ‘Doyle, Matthew’ Matthew.Doyle@kflaph.ca; Castro, Victor (MECP) Victor.Castro@ontario.ca; Dick, Sarah (MECP) Sarah.Dick@ontario.ca Subject: RE: 3898 Greenfield Rd - MECP Groundwater Comments
Hello Claire Thank you for forwarding the revised Terrain Analysis Report dated February 25, 2020. I had not received a copy of this report previously and I have reviewed it to find the sections that were revised. The main changes are related to the sewage works design proposed by Groundwork Engineering. In the first version of the report (January 10, 2020) GEL essentially recommends the following:
construction of a Class 4 Level IV waste water system with P-II phosphorus reduction certification; a partially raised Type A effluent dispersal bed using sand with as high as possible concentration of iron and aluminum; and, system located on the northern part of the site.
In the revised report GEL recommends the following:
construction of a Class 4 Level IV waste water system; a partially raised enhanced Type A effluent dispersal bed with a minimum depth 600 mm of phosphorus retentive sand; and, system located on native silty sand 75 metres from the shoreline of the lake on the northern part of the site.
Overall I am not in agreement with the GEL recommendation to locate the system in the northern end of the site closer to the lake. Rather, I recommend that the system is located further from the lake in the southern part of the site for the reasons discussed in my memorandum dated June 5, 2020. The studies provided by GEL and my assessment of conditions at the site have identified hydrogeological sensitivity (shallow fractured bedrock, Karst) that requires a precautionary approach to sewage works location / design. This is why (in my June 2020 memorandum) I had supported the protective system design initially proposed by GEL (including enhanced phosphorus treatment) at the location in the southern part of the site that I interpret to be the most protective location for the system from a groundwater perspective. The ministry is open to discussion on the elements included in the sewage works design at the southern location provided that the system can acceptably reduce phosphorus inputs to the lake (e.g. phosphorous treatment unit and / or other measures to reduce phosphorus loading). I recommend that GEL should develop a proposed detailed design for the southern location in consideration of the hydrogeological sensitivity across this site that will ensure no impacts to the lake. I would be happy to review and comment on any additional information. Please let me know if you would like to discuss this further. Regards. Kyle Stephenson, M.Sc., P.Eng. Hydrogeologist / Group Leader Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Eastern Region 1259 Gardiners Road, Unit 3, Kingston ON K7P 3J6 Phone: 613 540-6875 Cell: 613 561-9504 Email: kyle.stephenson@ontario.ca
Page 97 of 153
Ms. Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services Township of South Frontenac Box 100 Sydenham, ON KOH2T0 Dear Ms. Dodds: Re: Z-20-03
—
Wright Zoning Bylaw Amendment
KFL&APublic Health has reviewed the above application and offer the following comments. 1.
We have reviewed the proposal sewage system design provided by Groundworks Engineering. This design meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. The same design located in the severances, approved location, increases the separation from Loughborough Lake by approximately 200 m. This maximizes the clearance from the sewage system to Loughborough Lake, providing the best protection for the lake from
nutrients. Locating the sewage system, as remote from Loughborough Lake as possible, minimizes nutrients from getting into the lake. This was the goal of the original zoning bylaw requirement of 300 m. Any concern expressed by Groundworks of the currently approved sewage system location can easily be addressed at the permit stage. By increasing building code minimums and using the appropriate materials the impact of the lake can be minimized. Best case for the quality of lake water would be to install Groundworks proposed system in the originally approved location. The original location was approved to be able to accommodate a leaching bed (largest
potential footprint). If you have any questions or require any further assistance or clari?cation, do not hesitate to contact me Sincerely yours,
AG
wwwk?aph.ca MannOffce
221 Portsmoulh Avenue Kingston, Ontario K7M 1V5 613-5494232 I 1-300-267-7875
Branch Ol?ces
Cloyne Napanee Sharbol Lake
G13-336-8989 613-354-3357 613-279-2151
Fax: 613-3360522 Fax: 613-409613-279Fax: 6267 3997
<m
mmémmmm<m$3 ..m_8.
no:3
33.33
.8 833%
Sm.
.":..m03.820 wc__&:mnoqm. _%:w.> _u:u__n mozm 8 nosmqcnn Sm mmémmmm<m.83. mmumq no::6_m. 3.amm.8n.8: cm :omu:oEm
rocmscowocm:
..:__< Emma 8:<m::o:m_ m =a=o 13:: .403 Nmo3213
3 ..m<oS 2 3mx_3_~_:mEm …:m.8:nmcm.2<mm:
3m ._.o«:m:.u 9. mos»: Eoimzmn.Sm 5.: _.mm:…
3m
m§_m=33.
_u3:.8:mn
_u.«mn.8q
oz 8._ N8
4osSm:__u2 moi: woxSo
_<_m. n_m__6 95%.
2 Um<m_ou3m3mm..<_nmm
Page 98 of 153
Page 99 of 153 Minutes of Council June, 2, 2020 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Electronic Participation
Meeting # 13 Present in Council Chambers: Mayor Ron Vandewal Present via Teleconference: Ray Leonard, Doug Morey, Alan Revill, Randy Ruttan, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff Present in Council Chambers: Angela Maddocks - Clerk, Neil Carbone - Chief Administrative Officer, Claire Dodds - Director of Development Services, Louise Fragnito - Director of Corporate Services and Treasurer, Mark Segsworth - Director of Public Services Christine Woods - Senior Planner Present via Teleconference: Darcy Knott, Director of Fire and Emergency Services 1.
Call to Order
a)
Roll Call - Council Members and Staff The Clerk conducted the roll call.
b)
Resolution Resolution No. 2020-13-01 Moved by Councillor Ruttan Seconded by Councillor Revill That the Council meeting of June 2, 2020 be called to order at 7:00 p.m. Carried
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
a)
There were no declarations reported.
Approval of Agenda
a)
Resolution Resolution No. 2020-13-02 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Ruttan That the agenda be adopted as presented. Carried
Scheduled Closed Session - not applicable
***Recess *** - not applicable
Staff Presentations/Delegations
a)
Provincial Policy Statement - 2020 - Presented by Christine Woods, Senior Planner
Page 100 of 153 Minutes of Council June, 2, 2020 Council was introduced to Christine Woods, Senior Planner who reviewed the updated Provincial Policy Statement. 7.
Public Meeting - not applicable
Approval of Minutes
a)
May 19, 2020 Special Committee of the Whole Meeting Resolution No. 2020-13-03 Moved by Councillor Morey Seconded by Councillor Sleeth That the minutes of the Special Committee of the Whole meeting held May 19, 2020 be approved. Carried
b)
May 19, 2020 Council Meeting Resolution No. 2020-13-04 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Morey That the minutes of the May 19, 2020 Council meeting be approved. Carried
Business Arising from the Minutes
a)
CAO Performance Appraisal Process Resolution No. 2020-13-05 Moved by Councillor Leonard Seconded by Councillor Barr That Council approve the modified CAO appraisal framework and timeline as outlined in this report; and That Council appoints Mayor Vandewal, Councillor Revill and Councillor Leonard to a CAO performance review committee for 2020. Carried
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Green Bay Cemetery Resolution No. 2020-13-06 Moved by Councillor Ruttan Seconded by Councillor Revill That Council support the transfer of the Green Bay Cemetery to the Township and the associated land transfer and that any costs required for the transfer of the land be paid by the Township. Carried
b)
Tender # PS-2020-09 - 2020 Micro-Surfacing Program Resolution No. 2020-13-07 Moved by Councillor Morey Seconded by Councillor Sleeth
Page 2 of 4
Page 101 of 153 Minutes of Council June, 2, 2020 That Council approve the tender submission from Miller Paving Limited in the amount of $1,404,748.20 for Tender No. PS-2020-09, 2020 Micro Surfacing Program. Carried c)
Tender # PS-2020-10 - Pavement Program Resolution No. 2020-13-08 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland That Council approve the tender submission from G. Williams Paving Limited in the amount of $1,027,113.50 for Tender No. PS-2020-10, Pavement Program. Carried
d)
Road and Property Exchange - Norman Lane/Perth Road ( Spicer/Postma) See By-law 2020-29.
Committee Meeting Minutes - not applicable
By-laws
a)
By-law 2020-29 - Dedicate travelled portion of Norman Lane as common and public highway Resolution No. 2020-13-09 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Councillor Leonard That By-law 2020-29 be given first and second reading. Carried Resolution No. 2020-13-10 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Revill That By-law 2020-29, being a by-law to dedicate as common and public highway certain lands in the Township of South Frontenac pursuant to Section 31 (6) of the Municipal Act, 2001 be given third reading signed and sealed. Carried
Reports for Information
a)
Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing
Information Items - not applicable
Notice of Motions
Announcements/Statements by Councillors
a)
Councillor Sleeth inquired about developing a Property Standards By-law or proposed changes to the Safe Properties By-law. Neil Carbone indicated that staff are compiling more data with respect to municipal by-law enforcement processes and that by-law enforcement has been identified as one of the services that all of the Frontenac townships are considering in the Regional Service Delivery process.
b)
Councillor Revill recognized the implication of setting up new technology and commended staff for their work in accomplishing good audio connections for electronic meeting purposes.
Page 3 of 4
Page 102 of 153 Minutes of Council June, 2, 2020 17.
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
a)
Questions for Council from the Public Regarding COVID-19 and Township Services Deputy Mayor Sutherland commended staff for setting up the “Q and A"s on the website and for the clarity provided in the responses to residents.
Closed Session - not applicable
Confirmatory By-law
a)
By-law 2020-30 Resolution No. 2020-13-11 Moved by Councillor Morey Seconded by Councillor Sleeth That By-law 2020-30, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading this 2 day of June, 2020. Carried Resolution No. 2020-13-12 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Leonard That By-law 2020-30, being the confirmatory by-law, be given third reading, signed and sealed this 2 day of June 2020. Carried
Adjournment
a)
Resolution Resolution No. 2020-13-13 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Barr That the Council meeting of June 2, 2020 be adjourned at 7:43 p.m. Carried
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
Natural, Vibrant and Growing - a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 4 of 4
Page 103 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
Assumption of Responsibilities under Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the assumption of Part 8 Building Code Inspection services from Kingston Frontenac Lennox & Addington Public Health (KFLAPH) no later than December 1, 2020. That Council approve the creation of a Deputy Chief Building Official position and associated overhead costs within the Development Services Department to support the assumption of Part 8 service delivery. BACKGROUND: In January 2020 the Township and other Municipalities in the region were notified of KFLAPH’s intention to cease providing sewage system inspections outlined in Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code Act. The legislative oversight for these private sewage systems is found in the Ontario Building Code. Across the province, Part 8 components of the Ontario Building Code are typically administered by Municipal building officials along with the rest of the Code. KFLAPH is one of only four (4) health units in the Province that have voluntarily provided sewage system inspections under Part 8 of the Building Code. This change is due in part to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care’s Public Health Modernization program which has mandated cost savings and improved service delivery through consistency and equity of service delivery and the clarity of roles and responsibilities between the province, Public Health Ontario and local public health units. At its regular meeting on March 3, 2020, Township Council passed the following motion directing staff to bring forward a recommendation regarding Part 8 inspections: Resolution No. 2020-6-06 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Barr Whereas KFL&A Public Health have provided notification of their intent to terminate the agreement to carry out the municipality’s responsibility for sewage systems under the Ontario Building Code Act and attendant regulations effective January 1, 2021; And whereas the Township of South Frontenac recognizes the importance of protecting the environment and the installation and monitoring of septic systems; And whereas the Township of South Frontenac recognizes the requirement to provide this service; Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 104 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
And whereas the overarching priorities in the Township’s Strategic Plan include 1) Promote and support growth that meets the community’s needs while maintaining the integrity of the natural environment; 2) Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world; and, 3) Position South Frontenac as a regional leader; Be it resolved that the Council of the Township of South Frontenac request that staff provide a report that considers the Township’s capacity to administer Part 8 of the Building Code (septic inspections) in-house, with consideration for associated costs, including training, physical space, data from KFL&A Public Health and other implications. Carried ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: South Frontenac’s Share of Regional Part 8 Services The Township has obtained KFLAPH’s Part 8 inspection data for the past three (3) years including the number and type of permits issued, the hours allocated to Part 8 services and the fee revenue associated with each jurisdiction. South Frontenac accounts for 67% of the total number of permits issued by KFLAPH across all municipalities in 2019 (191 of 285), and for approximately 30% of the total inspection hours (1,427 of 4,811). In addition to the hours above, KFLAPH provides approximately 200-300 hours to South Frontenac for application review when Development Services processes consents, minor variances, subdivision/condominium and rezoning applications. KFLAPH’s allocation of courses/training, meetings and vacation time are also not included in the above numbers and amounts to an additional 300 hours annually for a total of 2,000+ inspector hours allocated to South Frontenac, not including administrative functions. The KFLAPH data also points to an upwards trend in the number of permits, fee revenue and hours allocated to South Frontenac over the last three (3) years. The fee revenues associated with South Frontenac’s share of Part 8 permits and related services has been calculated as $165,700 in 2017, $174,250 in 2018, and $176,950 in 2019, and is based on fixed fees over the three (3) year period. Cost of In-House Delivery Based on the 2,000+ hours being allocated to South Frontenac for Part 8 services, it would not be feasible to bring this service in-house without the addition of another Part 8-qualified position (1 FTE = 2,080 hours). This does not capture the administrative hours that KFLAPH is currently allocating to this service, nor does it accommodate any increased demands associated with growth trends. The cost for the Township to add a Part 8-qualified position (1.0 FTE) including wages/benefits, amortization of an additional vehicle, and overhead costs is between $117,500 - $135,000 annually. Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 105 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
The fee revenue associated with the Township’s Part 8 Services in 2019 was $176,950 based on 278 chargeable services including 191 permits. This results in net proceeds from assuming Part 8 from KFLAPH estimated at between $41,950 - $59,450 annually. Service Level Benefits The Development Services Department has identified a number of benefits of bringing Part 8 inspections and related services in-house instead of contracting this service to another outside agency:
- All inspectors would ideally perform Part 8 inspections for the files they are assigned, reducing wait times, processing delays and the requirement to liaise with outside agencies or conduct additional site visits;
- Ensures the Township has all information and history related to a property instead of regularly having to request information from others;
- Eliminates customer wait times for Part 8 reviews associated with circulating planning applications to an outside agency;
- Integrates Part 8 reviews within the internal development review process, delivering one-stop service to customers within the Township. Other Options Staff also considered other options for contracting Part 8 services to an outside agency: •
Preliminary discussions have occurred with some of our neighbouring municipalities about a collective approach to delivery of Part 8 Services
•
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) provides Part 8 inspection services to some municipalities and may be an option for the Township.
In these scenarios, the challenges associated with review timelines and process delays would likely continue. Further, the synergies and efficiencies that could be realised for South Frontenac in-house would be lost as would the allocation of net fee revenue to other Township building department needs. Contracting out is most advantageous when an organization lacks the resources or expertise to deliver a service efficiently. However, the Township possesses two Part 8-qualified staff and the administrative capacity to support the service. The Development Services Department is also in the process of implementing its CityView Land Management software which would further modernize the delivery of this service, beyond the capacity of most other service providers. Labour Market Considerations Recruitment of certified building inspectors has become a challenge in Eastern Ontario. The Township’s positions have only been filled after a market adjustment to the Collective Agreement wage rates for the unionized inspectors, Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 106 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
and after the Township experienced considerable turnover in CBOs over the past five years. Further, the market-adjusted rate for South Frontenac’s unionized inspectors is below that of Loyalist Township, the City of Kingston and KFLAPH’s current wages. While staff is confident in the business case for assuming Part 8 services, our ability to attract an individual with the appropriate qualifications is a concern. Succession Planning Providing career paths to retain existing personnel and the need to secure a qualified, experienced CBO into the future are factors in determining how the Township might recruit for another 1.0 FTE Part 8-qualified position. Regional Leadership and Service Delivery The organizational capacity of our Building Department and our geography make South Frontenac ideally positioned to provide Part 8 services to others. Subject to a business case, staff strongly supports the notion of providing this service to others; however, this added responsibility would create additional personnel management needs, possible satellite office oversight and emphasizes the importance of having qualified and experienced personnel in place to deliver the service to others. Given the labour market issues noted above and the fact that other municipalities in the region also require this service, South Frontenac needs to determine in short order if it wants to be in a position to offer this service to others, and to resource itself accordingly. Conclusion Based on the business case and discussion above, staff is recommending that the Township assume Part 8 building services and position itself to be able to deliver the service to others in the near term. This approach requires the addition of 1 x Part 8-qualified position at the onset in order to accommodate the local service demands. Due to the market for qualified building inspectors, there is strong concern about our ability to recruit a sufficiently experienced individual. A ‘green’ inspector would not allow us to assume Part 8 services by the end of 2020 when KFLAPH relinquishes this responsibility. Rather than risk an unsuccessful recruitment process and the strong potential that we would not be prepared to take on Part 8 services at the end of the year – and almost certainly not be in a position to assist our neighbours – staff is recommending the recruitment of an experienced, mid-level, Part 8-qualified building official position which would provide the following: • •
Part 8 qualifications and experience out of the gate Support for current inspectors as they build Part 8 experience Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 107 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer • • • •
Ability to offer competitive compensation options Oversight capacity/experience for any future outside service delivery Succession planning and career paths for current personnel Improved departmental capacity for eventual assumption of delegated planning authority from the County
In most jurisdictions, this type of position would take the form of a Deputy Chief Building Official which would have the statutory responsibility of the CBO in his/her absence and which may have an element of formal supervisory responsibility while still being required to conduct inspections. In this instance, another differentiator of this position would be its responsibility for the review and ability to comment on septic services to support approval of planning applications, which was a core service previously performed by KFLAPH. This recommendation is intended for discussion in open session on June 9, 2020 prior to a final report coming forward to Council on June 16, 2020.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This discussions in this report are aligned with the following aspects of the Strategic Plan: Priority #1: Position South Frontenac as a Regional Leader Priority #2: Promote and support growth that meets the community’s needs while maintaining the integrity of our natural environment Priority #3: Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world Mission • • •
Planning for the future, being proactive and having the capacity to adapt to change; Setting exemplary service and infrastructure standards that the community can be proud of; Managing our operations and assets in a financially sustainable manner;
Values • • •
Financial Sustainability Progressive and Flexible Public Service Excellence
FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Assuming part 8 services would result in the hiring of one new FTE Part 8qualified positions at an annualized cost of between $117,500 – and $135,000 including wages, benefits and associated overhead.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 108 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
The delivery of Part 8 building code inspections and related services is anticipated to generate $176,950 in additional revenue annually based on the current KFLAPH fee schedule. The building division is mandated to recoup all service delivery costs through its fees. The anticipated net proceeds from these additional fees ($41,950 $59,450) would be transferred to the building reserve and used to fund future operating shortfalls or associated capital investments. The change in service would require a comprehensive review and update of the Building Fees By-Law at a later date. ATTACHMENTS:
- Letter from KFLAPH (January 2020)
- Pro Forma for in-house Part 8 service delivery
- Projected Fees
- KFLAPH current allocations per Municipality Submitted by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
Louise Fragnito Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer
Claire Dodds, RPP MCIP Director of Development Services
Tom Berriault, CBCO Chief Building Official
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 109 of 153
Telephone: 613-549-1232, Ext. 1265 Email: Linda.Murray@kflaph.ca January 30, 2020 VIA: Electronic Mail (ncarbone@southfrontenac.net) Neil Carbone, CAO Township of South Frontenac 4432 George St, Box 100 Sydenham, ON, K0H 2T0 Dear Mr. Carbone: The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care has initiated a program they refer to as Public Health Modernization and they have engaged Jim Pine to consult with local boards of health on how to best advance this provincial direction. Boards of Health are asked to focus on:
- consistency and equity of service delivery of public health programs,
- improved clarity and alignment of roles and responsibilities between the province, Public Health Ontario and local public health,
- better and deeper relationships with primary care, and
- improved public health delivery and the sustainability of the public health system. In preparing for the consultation we have determined that KFL&A Public Health is one of only four of the 34 health units in Ontario that are voluntarily involved in handling sewage system inspections outlined in Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code Act. Given the Ministry of Health’s direction we realize that we are in a difficult position and need to be proactive going forward. The Ontario Public Health Programs (OPHS) identify the minimum expectations for public health programs and services to be delivered by a Board of Health. Legislative oversight for sewage systems is found in the Ontario Building Code, not the OPHS. As such, KFL&A Public Health will be better positioned to implement the province’s modernization objectives if we focus on improving mandatory public health programs and services and disinvest of non-essential programs, including the Part 8 program. Part 8 is best aligned with the other sections of the Ontario Building Code which are currently delivered by municipalities. Our goals for disinvestment are the maximized provision of public health services to our area municipalities and allowing health opportunities for all residents. …/2
Page 110 of 153 2. To ensure that our municipal partners have ample time to explore alternative service provision and that KFL&A Public Health can supply transitional aid, we are providing you with notification of our intent to terminate our agreement to carry out the municipality’s responsibilities for sewage systems under the Ontario Building Code Act and attendant regulations effective January 1, 2021. In order to support our municipal partners in this transition, KFL&A Public Health will: • •
provide enforcement services and transitional aid to our area municipalities for the remainder of 2020 and will continue to be a resource for municipalities into the future, and offer our records, resources and equipment related to the delivery of the Part 8 program to municipalities at no charge.
Sarah Ryding, Manager, Environmental Health, will be in touch with you shortly to schedule a meeting to discuss the details of a transition plan. If you have any question or require any further clarification, please contact Ms. Ryding or the undersigned. Yours sincerely,
Linda Murray Director, Corporate Services
Page 111 of 153
Part 8 Inspections for South Frontenac - Pro Forma Expenses (2020) Wages & Benefits
Total
Total
$95,000
$112,500
$95,000
$112,500
$7,500 $5,000 $10,000
$7,500 $5,000 $10,000
$22,500
$22,500
$117,500
$135,000
-$176,950
-$176,950
Total Fees
-$176,950
-$176,950
NET (Range)
-$59,450 -$41,950
Building Inspector (Range) Total Wages & Benefits
FTE 1
Other Vehicle Amortization (6 yrs) Legal Overhead (Training, phone, supplies, etc.) Total Other
Total Expenses
Revenues (2020) Fee Revenue All Fees
Part 8 Inspections for South Frontenac - Pro Forma 2019 Permit Volumes Location Bedford Storrington Loughborough Portland TOTAL South Frontenac
HRS 221 424 455 328 1428
Permits 29 56 62 44 191
For all KFLAPH Part 8 work
4812
285
South Frontenac Share
30%
67%
Permits and Other Services Certificate of Approval (class 4-5) Certificate of Approval (class 2-3) Additional inspections Septic tank replacement only Class A (large) Subdivision lots Severance applications Minor variances Minor var with performance review Garages, pools, decks Renovation Renewal Septic file search record search Change of installer Minor Variance with new system
TOTALS
Fee $950 $950 $250 $750 $1,050 $500 $500 $450 $700 $250 $250 $150 $150 $150 $500 $1,150
116 0 5 12 2 1 30 9 5 17 17 10 54 0 4 0
2017 Fees $110,200 $0 $1,250 $9,000 $2,100 $500 $15,000 $4,050 $3,500 $4,250 $4,250 $1,500 $8,100 $0 $2,000 $0
282
$165,700
115 0 0 20 0 5 47 11 5 9 23 11 26 0 4 0
2018 Fees $109,250 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $2,500 $23,500 $4,950 $3,500 $2,250 $5,750 $1,650 $3,900 $0 $2,000 $0
126 0 0 25 0 0 16 11 7 11 22 8 46 0 4 2
2019 Fees $119,700 $0 $0 $18,750 $0 $0 $8,000 $4,950 $4,900 $2,750 $5,500 $1,200 $6,900 $0 $2,000 $2,300
276
$174,250
278
$176,950
Page 112 of 153
Page 113 of 153
Page 114 of 153
Page 115 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL CLERK’S DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Speed Reduction throughout South Frontenac RECOMMENDATION: That Council direct the Director of Public Services to provide a report on addressing speed limit reductions throughout the Township. BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-law 2017-76 establishes the process for Notice of Motion. At the Committee of the Whole Meeting of June 9, 2020, Councillor Roberts served a notice of motion that the Director of Public Services provides a report concerning speed limit reductions throughout the township. Mayor Vandewal noted that he too has received several emails requesting speed limit reduction. There is an existing process in place for residents to submit requests (along with a petition) for speed limit reductions and it is acknowledged that the Director of Public Services meets regularly with the Frontenac OPP to discuss this issue along with several other matters. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and voted on. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Not at this time. ATTACHMENTS: Not applicable. Submitted/approved by: Angela Maddocks, Clerk
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 116 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
Price increase for Blue Boxes and Composters
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve an increase in price for recycling (Blue) boxes from $6.00 to $7.00 and for composters from $35.00 to $40.00. BACKGROUND: Due to an increase in wholesale prices we feel it necessary to increase the cost of blue boxes and composters to the public. Our most recent order for blue boxes cost $6.48 each and our composters were $36.77 each. The current prices have been in place for many years and staff do not anticipate any negative response from the public. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: This modest increase in the fees for blue boxes and composters ensures that they continue to cover the full cost of these products.
ATTACHMENTS: N/A Submitted/approved by:
Prepared by:
Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager
Jamie Brash Supervisor, Facilities/SWM
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader”
Page 117 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
City of Kingston Inclusion in 2020 Crack Sealing Program
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve adding the City of Kingston to the Township’s Crack Sealing Tender by way of Purchase Order; and, That Council approve an increase in the budget for the 2020 Crack Sealing tender of $53,175 + HST, being the additional work to be provided to and paid for by the City of Kingston. BACKGROUND: The Township of South Frontenac tendered for Crack Sealing services as budgeted in our 2020 Capital program. This tender closed on May 6th, 2020. A joint tender was not anticipated with the City of Kingston at that time. Since then the City of Kingston and Township of South Frontenac have entered into an agreement for joint tendering and have utilized this agreement for both Micro-Surfacing and also Paved Shoulders, both on Perth Road. The expectation of this agreement is for increased quantities and consistent specifications resulting in more interest and a reduction to unit rates. ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: An increase in our tender to accommodate the City’s crack sealing requirements is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the joint tendering agreement entered into with the City in May. We anticipate the Township’s willingness to assist the City will be reciprocated in the future and that it further strengthens the relationship between both municipalities. A separate agreement has been signed between the Township and the City to ensure that the City remains solely responsible for all requirements under the tender, for that portion of the work taking place within City limits. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There is no net cost to the Township to add this additional amount to our tender. There will be negligible carrying costs associated with the delay between the contractor being paid and when the City of Kingston pays its portion to the Township. In accordance with the Purchase Order provided by the City, payment is to be received within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from the Township. Submitted/approved by:
Prepared By:
Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Director of Public Services
David Holliday, CET Technical Supervisor
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader”
Page 118 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL RECREATION DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
Tender PS-2020-21 Resurfacing of Centennial & Gerald Ball Netsport Courts
RECOMMENDATION That Council accept the single bid of Bourassa Sport Technologies for Tender PS2020-21, Resurfacing of Netsports Courts, in the amount of $95,800 plus HST; and, That the unbudgeted amount of $11,913 for this project be funded from the Parkland Reserve. BACKGROUND: As part of the 2020 Budget Council approved $80,000 to resurface and install netting to support Tennis and Pickleball at both the Centennial Park Netsport Court and Gerald Ball Netsport Court. The work outlined below creates a premier space for both Tennis and Pickleball in South Frontenac, supporting the growth of these sports. Centennial & Gerald Ball Netsport Courts: • 6 pickleball courts with one Tennis court. Two of the pickleball courts would be within the Tennis court Preparation & Surface Repairs • Remove all excess dirt and vegetation. Pressure wash entire surface. • Leveling of major low spots and repair asphalt deterioration and cracks. Surfacing/Color Coating (32 m x 37 m pad) • Supply and install two base coats of Laykold NuSurf acrylic resurface (or equivalent, which acts as a minor leveler and sealer coat over the entire surface of the asphalt pad. •
Full Size Standard Tennis Court o supply and install two removable tennis net posts, as well as center anchor o Provide caps for holes o supply and install two coats of Laykold medium green colour paint (or equivalent) to the playing area of the tennis court. o supply and install Laykold white line paint for tennis (or equivalent). o supply one tennis net
•
6 Standard Size Pickleball Courts o 4 Standard Size Standalone Pickleball Courts supply and install removable pickleball net posts, as well as center anchor in the pre-dug holes and finish the pad immediately around the post installation where dug up. Provide caps for holes supply and install two coats of 2 coats of Laykold US blue colour paint (or equivalent) to the playing area of the pickleball court.
Our strength is our community.
Page 119 of 153
REPORT TO COUNCIL RECREATION DEPARTMENT
supply and install Laykold white line paint for pickleball (or equivalent). supply four pickleball nets. Supply and install a backdrop netting in between the four pickleball courts
o 2 Standard Size Pickleball Courts with portable nets within Tennis court supply and install two coats of 2 coats of Laykold US blue colour paint (or equivalent) to the playing area of the pickleball court. supply and install Laykold white line paint for pickleball (or equivalent). supply two portable pickleball nets
ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: Bourassa Sport Technologies is a reputable company that specialize is this type of Netsport court design and construction. They have met all the Tender requirements and references provided have been contacted. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The full cost including HST is $95,800 plus HST. The approved 2020 Capital Budget included an amount of $88,000 for the project. There is a 2019 Carryover from Gerald Ball Park in the amount of $5,573. In consultation with the Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer, the shortfall of $11,913 can be funded from Parkland Reserve.
Submitted/approved by:
Prepared by:
Mark Segsworth, P.Eng Director of Public Services
Tim Laprade, Arena/Recreation Supervisor Jamie Brash, Facilities Manager
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
Our strength is our community.
Page 120 of 153
Payment Listing For the period of June 3, 2020 to June 16, 2020
Accounts Payable Payment Listing:
$
526,055.92
$
99,014.00
For the period of June 3, 2020 to June 16, 2020 Payroll Payment Listing:
Pay Period #20-11
Pay date June 3 2020 For the period of May 17, 2020 to May 30, 2020
Volunteer Firefighters
Pay date June 15, 2019
$114,702.25
For the period of March 1 2020 to May 31, 2020
Total Payments
RECOMMENDATION:
1. It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts $
Payable and Payroll for the period ending June 16, 2020 in the amount of 739,772.17
Submitted by: Mark Foster - Accounting Clerk Approved by: Emily Caird- Acting Deputy Treasurer
$
739,772.17
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
Ranges: Cheque Date:
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2:57:41 PM
From: 2020-06-03
To: 2020-06-16
Page:
1
Page 121 of 153
Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC
10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000013446
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
124547
ESOLUTIONS GROUP Extract Subscribers List
72477
THE FRONTENAC NEWS Ads- May 7,14,21,28
Total EFT000000013446 EFT000000013448 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013448
Total Gen
Amount $132.29 $132.29 $2,645.76 $2,645.76
$2,778.05
1000 Cheque 070938 Total 070938 EFT000000013416
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
269100
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE Softener Salt
1181
1000 ISLANDS CUTTING EDGE LAWN CARE Grass Cutting
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013416 EFT000000013438 2020-06-09
Amount $24.39 $24.39 $162.82 $162.82
CULLIGAN 24242TJ
Water
2019592 2019608
J & J LANDSCAPING Grass Cutting Clean up Debris + Gravel
61262
LIGHTING…FX INC. LED Fixture
SALES0089974
TOTAL POWER LTD Generator Maintenance
103517 104053
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Key Screws
Total EFT000000013438 EFT000000013452 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013452 EFT000000013459 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013459 EFT000000013482 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013482 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013486 EFT000000013487 2020-06-09
$28.79 $28.79 $87.51 $90.74 $178.25 $216.64 $216.64 $2,593.09 $2,593.09 $3.04 $16.67 $19.71
TRUE ELECTRIC 6934
Total EFT000000013487 EFT000000013489 2020-06-09 19-014-8
Install New Light+ Exit Sign UBCON CONSTRUCTION LTD New Roof-Lower Section
Total EFT000000013489
Total
$847.14 $847.14 $14,861.03 $14,861.03
$18,931.86
1100 Counc Cheque EFT000000013439
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
164034
CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY Legal Advice
11982
STRATEGY CORP INC. 20/04 Strategic Review
Total EFT000000013439 EFT000000013478 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013478
Total Counc
Amount $254.40 $254.40 $44,596.32 $44,596.32
$44,850.72
1210 CAO Cheque EFT000000013439
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 164033
Vendor
Description
CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY Legal Advice
Total EFT000000013439
Total CAO
Amount $203.52 $203.52
$203.52
1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000013429
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Description
Amount
CDW CANADA INC XWJ8911
Total EFT000000013429 EFT000000013485 2020-06-09
Sound Cables
7787 7998 9705
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND Milk + Cream Planting Food Coffee+ Sugar + Cream
103517
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Coffee Filters
47652
VERSUS BUSINESS FORMS & LABELS 10,000X Envelopes
Total EFT000000013485 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013486 EFT000000013492 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013492
Vendor
$55.60 $55.60 $8.87 $19.66 $26.06 $54.59 $7.10 $7.10 $765.74 $765.74
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
2
Page 122 of 153
Total Clk
$883.03
Total GG
$67,647.18
20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 070940 Total 070940 070941 Total 070941 EFT000000013416
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
66371555
BUNZL CANADA INC 4X 360 Cleaner
4852
JUSTUS AUTO BODY Boxside Panels + Wheel Repairs
1181 1181 1181
1000 ISLANDS CUTTING EDGE LAWN CARE Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting
A2777981
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. 20/05 Pest Control
153368
AJ STONE COMPANY LIMITED Calibration Gas, Cylinder
1-255698
BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) 20/06 Site Rental
41209
COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS LTD. Service + Remote
IN156856
FIRE MARSHAL’S PUBLIC FIRE 3X Books
2019595 2019597 2019598 2019604 2019605
J & J LANDSCAPING Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting
KS27693
KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON Headlight Flasher Module
20/05/20-18
LEONARD, ELIZABETH Cleaning
2020-06-09
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013416 EFT000000013418 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013418 EFT000000013421 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013421 EFT000000013424 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013424 EFT000000013434 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013434 EFT000000013447 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013447 EFT000000013452 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013452 EFT000000013456 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013456 EFT000000013457 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013457 EFT000000013461 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013461 EFT000000013469 2020-06-09
$366.32 $366.32 $1,526.40 $1,526.40 $366.34 $122.11 $122.11 $610.56 $48.54 $48.54 $536.36 $536.36 $328.00 $328.00 $213.70 $213.70 $187.17 $187.17 $114.98 $113.97 $101.76 $146.84 $366.34 $843.89 $585.71 $585.71 $60.00 $60.00
Annual Monitoring Annual Monitoring
$305.28 $305.28 $610.56
4X Wheel Chock + Gas Can +Hose
$112.89 $112.89
Shipping Shipping
$272.89 $30.53 $303.42
PRINCESS AUTO 1519399
Total EFT000000013469 EFT000000013471 2020-06-09
PUROLATOR INC. 444537947 444589569
Total EFT000000013471 EFT000000013472 2020-06-09 SCO92812674
RICOH CANADA INC. 20/04 Copier Usage + Rental
1057-14076 1057-14079 1057-14192 1057-14394 1057-14457 1057-14561
ROSESON DISTRIBUTORS INC. 43.47L @.6517 52.94L @.6517 71.00L @.6163 65.90L @.6782 60.05L @.8287 48.82L @.6782
Total EFT000000013472 EFT000000013474 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013474 EFT000000013477 2020-06-09
$149.45 $149.45 $28.83 $35.11 $44.53 $45.49 $50.64 $33.69 $238.29
SNIDER, LISA 20/01-20/05
Total EFT000000013477 EFT000000013479 2020-06-09
20/01-20/05 Cleaning
29877420 29987289
SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 2034.9L @.45 2187.2L @.45
48904 49592
TRIM-LINE OF SOUTH EAST 3X Truck Caps + Roll Out Trays Repair Boxside Stripping
103587 229514
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Laundry Faucet + Tub Assorted Plumbing Supplies
19-014-10
UBCON CONSTRUCTION LTD Repair Work-Roof Vents+ G.Door
Total EFT000000013479 EFT000000013484 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013484 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013486 EFT000000013489 2020-06-09
Total Fire
Amount
LONDRY ALARMS 202991 202992
Total EFT000000013489
Description
$315.00 $315.00 $1,027.91 $1,104.83 $2,132.74 $16,027.20 $254.40 $16,281.60 $87.49 $131.49 $218.98 $776.43 $776.43
$26,446.01
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
3
Page 123 of 153
2400 Police Cheque 070944
Date 2020-06-09
Inv #
Vendor
Description
MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES 130705201213046 OPP Wages
Amount
Total 070944
$75.22 $75.22
Total Police
$75.22
2505 CRCA Cheque EFT000000013437
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 AA-003-20-2
Vendor
Description
CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION 2020 Levy -2nd Installment
Total EFT000000013437
Total CRCA
Amount $65,209.05 $65,209.05
$65,209.05
2515 Rid Vly Cheque 070945
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 50554
Vendor
Description
RIDEAU VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 2020 Municipal Levy
Amount
Total 070945
$24,365.69 $24,365.69
Total Rid Vly
$24,365.69
2605 Build Cheque EFT000000013451
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 45023 45035
Vendor
Description
INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES Unpaired Ex.4441 P.S. Reprogrammed P.S. Phone
Total EFT000000013451
Amount $86.50 $86.50 $173.00
Total Build
$173.00
Total PP&P
$116,268.97
30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque EFT000000013436
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
59031
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Enterprise License Agreement
SCO92812674
RICOH CANADA INC. 20/04 Copier Usage + Rental
Total EFT000000013436 EFT000000013472 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013472
Total PW OH
Amount $1,329.32 $1,329.32 $88.43 $88.43
$1,417.75
3005 RdAdmOH Cheque EFT000000013424
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 1-255698
Vendor
Description
BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) 20/06 Site Rental
Total EFT000000013424
Total RdAdmOH
Amount $295.38 $295.38
$295.38
3010 Cheque 070938 Total 070938 070939 Total 070939 070942 Total 070942 070943
Total 070943 EFT000000013417
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Description
267990
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE Batteries
95585526
BELL CANADA C/O SPECIAL BILLING Relocate Cable
TR419311
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE Headlight
712596327 712596328
LAFARGE CANADA INC Gabion Stone Gabion Stone
32184 32184 32185
BOULTON SEPTIC/LARMON’S Flagging Flagging Flagging
A2761320
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. Pest Control
71489911
AIR LIQUIDE CANADA INC. Oxygen
42042
BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS 2X Tires
661641
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES Cleaner+ Partswasher
2020-06-09
2020-06-09
2020-06-09
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013417 EFT000000013418 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013418 EFT000000013420 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013420 EFT000000013425 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013425 EFT000000013430 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013430
Vendor
Amount $14.47 $14.47 $1,920.73 $1,920.73 $664.53 $664.53 $370.45 $230.97 $601.42 $656.35 $656.35 $681.79 $1,994.49 $72.85 $72.85 $35.32 $35.32 $2,870.36 $2,870.36 $1,423.11 $1,423.11
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
EFT000000013431
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013431 EFT000000013441 2020-06-09 9751 Total EFT000000013441 EFT000000013442 2020-06-09
Uniform Cleaning Supplies Uniform Cleaning Supplies Uniform Cleaning Supplies Uniform Cleaning Supplies Uniform Cleaning Supplies Uniform Cleaning Supplies D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING Stand for Work Signs
Page 124 of 153 $10.16 $32.37 $40.00 $115.90 $10.16 $32.37 $42.55 $115.81 $40.00 $225.86 $10.16 $42.68 $718.02 $873.27 $873.27
DRAPER DOORS 20391 20436 20476
Total EFT000000013442 EFT000000013445 2020-06-09
Service Call: Key Way Opera SH Operator Adjust Door + Wall Button
$96.67 $1,628.16 $183.17 $1,908.00
Culverts +Couplers+ Woven Geo.
$22,596.93 $22,596.93
HUBB CAP 1020739
Total EFT000000013445 EFT000000013453 2020-06-09 17182 17183
JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE 20/05 Portable Toilet Rental 20/05 Portable Toilet Rental
P29481
JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC. Seal Kit
9307622683
KENT AUTOMOTIVE Assorted Parts
20/05/30-19
LEONARD, ELIZABETH Cleaning
DAR21126389
LIEBHERR CANADA LTD Screw Coupling Plugs + Sleeves
2102348561 2102354010 2102379124 2102382275 2102397000
MESSER CANADA INC. Gases Gases Utilization Fee Utilization Fee Gases
DA0007653806
MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA CANADA INC 2X Tires
145727
PAT’S RADIATOR SERVICE LTD. Snow Plow Parts
864144610
PREMIER TRUCK GROUP Windshield Arm
Total EFT000000013453 EFT000000013454 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013454 EFT000000013455 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013455 EFT000000013457 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013457 EFT000000013458 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013458 EFT000000013460 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013460 EFT000000013463 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013463 EFT000000013467 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013467 EFT000000013468 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013468 EFT000000013469 2020-06-09
$122.11 $122.11 $244.22 $141.67 $141.67 $472.04 $472.04 $375.00 $375.00 $744.42 $744.42 $25.01 $251.91 $4.07 $49.86 $156.15 $487.00 $1,276.41 $1,276.41 $1,600.68 $1,600.68 $79.41 $79.41
PRINCESS AUTO 1526238
Total EFT000000013469 EFT000000013476 2020-06-09
Wheel Spinner Deluxe
$22.89 $22.89
4X Truck Numbers
$28.49 $28.49
SIGNS PLUS 3190
Total EFT000000013476 EFT000000013483 2020-06-09 6083-595639 6083-596854 6083-596999 6083-597141
TOWN AND COUNTRY AUTO SUPPLY Filter + Radial Seal New Water Pump Absorbent Button Cell Batteries
9708 6584
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND Water Water
103520 229609
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Water Cooler Tape + Socket
173-271422 173-271485 173-271676 173-271676 511-329751 511-329808 173-272479
UNIVERSAL SUPPLY GROUP Trailer Suspension Trailer Parts Pigtails + Lamps Lamps 2X Belt + Pulley Belt Tensioner DEF
Total EFT000000013483 EFT000000013485 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013485 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013486 EFT000000013491 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013491
4
CINTAS 4050395550 4050395550 4050395567 4050395567 4051084980 4051084980 4051085050 4051085050 4051670086 4051670086 4051670112 4051670112
Total
Page:
$11.83 $202.52 $257.05 $34.44 $505.84 $99.90 $24.90 $124.80 $183.16 $41.70 $224.86 $5.74 $19.78 $135.64 $195.28 $67.44 $126.17 $192.33 $742.38
$42,763.61
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
5
Page 125 of 153
3210 Brushing Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/04/17-35 20/05/11-15 20/05/11-16 20/05/12-14 20/05/12-17 20/05/13-18 20/05/14-19
Total 070946 EFT000000013444
Description
2020-06-09
Flagging Flagging Flagging Flagging Flagging Flagging Flagging
$262.29 $514.14 $514.14 $438.59 $262.29 $262.29 $262.29 $2,516.03
ECO TREE CARE 3493
Elm Tree Removal
Total EFT000000013444
Total Brushing
$890.40 $890.40
$3,406.43
3215 Drainage Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/15-28 20/05/19-31 20/05/20-32 20/05/21-33
Total 070946 EFT000000013417
Description
2020-06-09 32185
Total EFT000000013417 EFT000000013445 2020-06-09
Dozer Rental Flagging Flagging Flagging BOULTON SEPTIC/LARMON’S Flagging
$569.86 $539.33 $539.33 $488.96 $2,137.48 $1,287.26 $1,287.26
HUBB CAP 1020740
Total EFT000000013445 EFT000000013449 2020-06-09 7376 7376
15X Culverts G WILLIAMS PAVING LTD Road Repairs Driveway Ends
Total EFT000000013449
Total Drainage
$1,796.88 $1,796.88 $2,696.64 $2,900.16 $5,596.80
$10,818.42
3245 Traff Accd Cheque EFT000000013480
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 S-0063207
Vendor
Description
SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL Gravel
Total EFT000000013480
Total Traff Accd
Amount $9,247.32 $9,247.32
$9,247.32
3310 Hardtop Patching Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/07-20 20/05/08-21 20/05/11-22 20/05/12-23 20/05/13-24 20/05/14-25
Total 070946 EFT000000013417
Description
2020-06-09
Flagging Patching Patching Flagging Patching Patching
32186 32187
BOULTON SEPTIC/LARMON’S Patching Patching
393313
COCO PAVING INC HL2
6579
COMPTON PROPANE SOLUTIONS 100lbs Propane
Total EFT000000013417 EFT000000013432 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013432 EFT000000013435 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013435 EFT000000013465 2020-06-09
$1,109.32 $934.16 $934.16 $934.16 $1,050.93 $1,371.47 $6,334.20 $2,419.85 $3,968.64 $6,388.49 $609.05 $609.05 $441.28 $441.28
O. BETTSCHEN 44528 44561 44572
Total EFT000000013465 EFT000000013480 2020-06-09 S-0063529 Total EFT000000013480 EFT000000013488 2020-06-09
Cold Patch Cold Patch Cold Patch SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL Water Truck Rental
$564.67 $791.79 $1,544.15 $2,900.61 $4,121.28 $4,121.28
TW PATCHING 988326 988328
Patching Patching
Total EFT000000013488
Total Hardtop Patching
$12,638.59 $5,632.42 $18,271.01
$39,065.92
3320 should maint Cheque EFT000000013423
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
24238151
BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS Roller Rental
S-0063360
SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL Gravel
Total EFT000000013423 EFT000000013480 2020-06-09
Amount $4,198.01 $4,198.01 $2,162.17
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
6
Page 126 of 153
Total EFT000000013480
$2,162.17
Total should maint
$6,360.18
3405 Washout Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/08-13
Gravel Patching
Total 070946
Total Washout
$417.22 $417.22
$417.22
3415 dust layer Cheque EFT000000013464
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
INV0078186 INV0078336 INV0078701 INV0078702 INV0078703 INV0078704 INV0078730 INV0078770
MORRIS CHEMICALS INCORPORATED Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride Calcium Chloride
S-0063665
SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL Gravel
Total EFT000000013464 EFT000000013480 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013480
Total dust layer
Amount $6,749.64 $6,066.27 $2,943.71 $2,973.81 $3,126.48 $4,739.64 $2,975.97 $4,846.52 $34,422.04 $3,459.84 $3,459.84
$37,881.88
3425 Gradng & Grvl resurf Cheque EFT000000013465
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
Amount
O. BETTSCHEN 44598
Total EFT000000013465 EFT000000013480 2020-06-09
Gravel
S-0063360 S-0063530
SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL Gravel Gravel
132143
WHITE’S WEARPARTS LTD Blades
Total EFT000000013480 EFT000000013494 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013494
Total Gradng & Grvl resurf
$1,643.05 $1,643.05 $9,829.90 $6,608.70 $16,438.60 $3,101.64 $3,101.64
$21,183.29
3601 Barricds & Sfty Matls Cheque EFT000000013433
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 247608
Vendor
Description
COLLINS SAFETY INC. Lens Tissues + Traffic Vests
Total EFT000000013433
Total Barricds & Sfty Matls
Amount $119.35 $119.35
$119.35
3615 Street signs Cheque EFT000000013426
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 364124
Total EFT000000013426 EFT000000013476 2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
BMR MANUFACTURING INC. “Wilson Road’ Sign
Amount $199.16 $199.16
SIGNS PLUS 3192
Total EFT000000013476 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09
Street Sign TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Lumber Lumber + Screws
$37.59 $37.59
Total EFT000000013486
$8.12 $27.41 $35.53
Total Street signs
$272.28
229560 229563
3620 Reg signs Cheque EFT000000013426
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
364122
BMR MANUFACTURING INC. Speed Limit Signs
6083-596886
TOWN AND COUNTRY AUTO SUPPLY 25X Cut off Wheel
Total EFT000000013426 EFT000000013483 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013483
Total Reg signs
Amount $1,507.70 $1,507.70 $130.25 $130.25
$1,637.95
3625 RR cross mnt Cheque EFT000000013427
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 11121622
Vendor
Description
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY 20-05 Flasher Contract
Amount
Total EFT000000013427
$888.00 $888.00
Total RR cross mnt
$888.00
3638 Locates Cheque
Date
Inv #
Vendor
Description
Amount
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
EFT000000013466
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2020-06-09
ONTARIO ONE CALL 20/05 Notifications
202011849 Total EFT000000013466
Total Locates
Page:
7
Page 127 of 153 $126.16 $126.16
$126.16
Total Trans
$175,901.14
40 Env 5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque EFT000000013439
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
164010
CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY Legal Advice
K631549
SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED Gloves + Garbage Bags
Total EFT000000013439 EFT000000013481 2020-06-09
Amount $585.12 $585.12
Total EFT000000013481
$123.70 $123.70
Total SW & Fac OH
$708.82
5105 Garb coll Cheque EFT000000013483
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 6083-595719
Vendor
Description
TOWN AND COUNTRY AUTO SUPPLY Oil Filter
Total EFT000000013483
Total Garb coll
Amount $47.62 $47.62
$47.62
5110 Gab disp Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Total 070948 EFT000000013453
2020-06-09
Portland Dump/Waste Portland Dump/Dozer Portland Dump/Dozer Portland Dump/Waste Portland Dump/Waste Dozer + Shovel Rental
30119-0639-7 30119-0639-7 30119-0639-7
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF CANADA CORP ICI Waste ICI Waste ICI Waste
17246 17247
JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE 20/06 Portable Toilet Rental 20/06 Portable Toilet Rental
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013453 EFT000000013462 2020-06-09
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/11-07 20/05/14-10 20/05/12-34 20/05/21-26 20/05/21-27 20/05/21-30
Total 070946 070948
Description
MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 20/05/22-PORTLAND 420 Yards Fill
Total EFT000000013462 EFT000000013465 2020-06-09
$1,246.56 $488.45 $325.63 $1,424.64 $534.24 $1,465.34 $5,484.86 $4,053.04 $2,374.67 $84.98 $6,512.69 $117.02 $117.02 $234.04 $3,205.44 $3,205.44
O. BETTSCHEN 44583 44584 44589 44594 44598
Total EFT000000013465 EFT000000013493 2020-06-09 812377
Shot Rock Shot Rock Shot Rock Shot Rock Gravel WHALEY, GEORGE 20/05 Landfill Services
Total EFT000000013493
Total Gab disp
$1,852.52 $2,105.22 $1,185.25 $1,150.43 $191.66 $6,485.08 $6,619.49 $6,619.49
$28,541.60
5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/14-11 20/05/21-29
Dumping Cardboard Truck Rental
Total 070946
Total Rec Disp/Prc
$154.67 $154.67 $309.34
$309.34
Total Env
$29,607.38
70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque 070946
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
2020-06-09 1181 1181 1181 1181 1181 1181
Total EFT000000013416 EFT000000013441 2020-06-09
Description
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 20/05/08-09
Total 070946 EFT000000013416
Vendor
Chipping 1000 ISLANDS CUTTING EDGE LAWN CARE Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING
$254.40 $254.40 $325.63 $1,037.95 $284.93 $284.93 $305.28 $1,221.12 $3,459.84
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 9766
Total EFT000000013441 EFT000000013452 2020-06-09 2019599 2019600 2019601
Remount Door J & J LANDSCAPING Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting
Total EFT000000013452
Page:
8
Page 128 of 153 $1,139.84 $1,139.84 $99.74 $183.17 $1,099.01 $1,381.92
Total Health
$6,236.00
Total Cem
$6,236.00
80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 070947 Total 070947 EFT000000013416
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09
Vendor
Description
2020 PARKING
VANKOUGHNETT, RANDY 2020 Parking Space Rental
1181 1181 1181 1181 1181
1000 ISLANDS CUTTING EDGE LAWN CARE Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting
31801
BOULTON SEPTIC/LARMON’S Snow Plowing
7297
ASSELSTINE HARDWARE Cable Ties
0838-123752
EARL ROSEBUSH FUELS 406.40L @.485
45036
INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES Ext. 4447 A.P.
2019584 2019585 2019586 2019587 2019588 2019589 2019590 2019591 2019592 2019593 2019594 2019596 2019602 2019603 2019606 2019607 2019608 2019608
J & J LANDSCAPING Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting Grass Cutting General Clean Up Tree Limb Clean Up Clean up Debris + Gravel Clean up Debris + Gravel
2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013416 EFT000000013417 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013417 EFT000000013422 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013422 EFT000000013443 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013443 EFT000000013451 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013451 EFT000000013452 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013452 EFT000000013461 2020-06-09
Amount $450.00 $450.00 $936.19 $142.46 $834.43 $122.11 $244.22 $2,279.41 $50.88 $50.88 $9.15 $9.15 $233.87 $233.87 $86.50 $86.50 $325.63 $81.41 $940.26 $366.34 $854.78 $122.11 $256.43 $142.46 $87.51 $301.21 $488.45 $325.63 $350.05 $525.08 $829.34 $157.73 $90.74 $90.74 $6,335.90
LONDRY ALARMS 202990 202990
Total EFT000000013461 EFT000000013475 2020-06-09
20/06 Monitoring + Rental 20/06 Monitoring + Rental
$28.49 $28.49 $56.98
Repair Ball Park Netting Repair Ball Park Netting
$646.44 $646.43 $1,292.87
R.W. ELECTRIC 38138 38138
Total EFT000000013475 EFT000000013486 2020-06-09 103499
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE Duct Tape
19-014-7 19-014-9 19-017-6
UBCON CONSTRUCTION LTD Repair Ball Shed Gate Footing + Armour Stones Progress Draw #6
Total EFT000000013486 EFT000000013489 2020-06-09
Total EFT000000013489
Total Rec
$4.06 $4.06 $3,256.32 $735.72 $96,117.07 $100,109.11
$110,908.73
8210 VCA Cheque EFT000000013428
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 2020007
Vendor
Description
CASEMENT, JOYCE 300X Masks
Total EFT000000013428
Amount $286.78 $286.78
Total VCA
$286.78
Total Rec
$111,195.51
90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque
Date
Inv #
Vendor
Description
Amount
System:
2020-06-10
User ID:
mfoster
EFT000000013436
2:57:41 PM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2020-06-09 59031
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Enterprise License Agreement
164037
CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY Legal Advice
Total EFT000000013436 EFT000000013439 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013439 EFT000000013450 2020-06-09
Page:
9
Page 129 of 153 $2,658.65 $2,658.65 $534.24 $534.24
IBI GROUP 10058775
Total EFT000000013450 EFT000000013451 2020-06-09
20/04 Planning Services
45058
INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES Unpair Ext. 4442 M.H.
112627
PRINTFUSION INC. Business Cards A.G. C.W.
Total EFT000000013451 EFT000000013470 2020-06-09 Total EFT000000013470
Total Plan
$11,814.95 $11,814.95 $86.50 $86.50 $149.22 $149.22
$15,243.56
9800 Dev Serv Cheque EFT000000013419
Date
Inv #
2020-06-09 IN0019414
Vendor
Description
AINLEY GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES LTD Engineering Services
Total EFT000000013419
Total Dev Serv
Amount $50.17 $50.17
$50.17
Total Plan
$15,293.73
99 9999 Cheque 070949 Total 070949 EFT000000013473
Date 2020-06-09
Inv #
2020-06-09 643910 643911 643912 643914 643915 643916
Total EFT000000013473
Vendor
Description
MCLAY, SUZANNE 2020 CHQ OVERPAYMENT USD Chq Overpayment ROSEN ENERGY GROUP F 1102.8L GAS @.5990 F 951.6L CLR @.5140 F 736.1L MKD @.3940 B 546.4L GAS @.5990 B 2259.1L CLR @.5140 B 946.2L MKD @.3940
Amount $32.61 $32.61 $762.55 $561.93 $355.44 $369.92 $1,366.69 $456.87 $3,873.40
Total
$3,906.01
Total
$3,906.01
Total
$526,055.92
Page 130 of 153
INFORMATION REPORT TO COUNCIL PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
Proposed 2020 Construction & Maintenance Schedule
RECOMMENDATION: For information only.
BACKGROUND: Public Services attempts to prepare a construction & maintenance schedule yearly so that Public Services personnel, Township administration and Councillors are aware of any projects that are scheduled to take place should residents have inquiries. It is recognized that more effort is required to keep residents apprised of what may be occurring in their neighbourhood. The schedule will also be posted on our website for the public.
FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: All projects have been approved through the budget process and sufficient funds exist in the 2020 budget for these projects.
ATTACHMENTS: •
Proposed 2020 Construction & Maintenance Schedule
Submitted/approved by: Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Director of Public Services Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader”
2020 DRAFT CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
Month
Week Starting Mar 2 - 6
MARCH
Mar 9 - 13
Mar 16 - 20
Brushing/Mowing Drainage (Local & Arterial) (Ditching & Culverts)
Facility Capital Projects (New Facilities & Repairs/Enhancements)
Parks and Recreation Capital Projects (New Features & Upgrades)
Road Maintenance - Gravel (Resurfacing, Calcium Chloride, Guard Rail)
Road Capital Projects (In-House and Outsourced)
Road Maintenance - Hard Surface (Patching, Shouldering, Street Sweeping, Guard Rail)
Sewer Maintance Road Signs Solid Waste (MH/CB Cleaning & (Local & Arterial) (Collection and WDS) Sewer Flushing)
Brushing Hinchinbrooke Road
Wolfe Swamp Rd, Bradford Rd & Ellerbeck Rd
Mar 23 - 27
Mar 30 - 3
APRIL
April 6 - 10
April 13 - 17
Gould Lake Road
Town Hall Basement Renovations
Colebrooke Rd, Boyce Rd & Holleford Rd
Resurfacing Storrington District Resurfacing Loughborough District
April 20 - 24 Railton Rd, Arthur Rd & Ramparts Rd
Gilmore Point Building
April 27 - 1
Resurfacing Portland District
May 4 - 8 White Lake Rd & Green Bay Rd
Sunbury Village Reconstruction (Outsourced)
May 11 - 15 Microsurfacing Harrowsmith Village (Outsourced)
MAY
Portland Various Areas May 18 - 22
Resurfacing Bedford District
Arterial Road Mowing 1st Cut
Storrington Various Areas
JUNE
June 1 - 5
Crack Sealing Various Locations (Outsourced)
June 8 - 12 Shipyards Local Road Mowing 1st Cut
Loughborough Various Areas
Point Tennis Court
North Shore Road
Street Sweeping Sydenham Village/ Harrowmsith
Street Sweeping - Sign Maintenance Local Roads Arterial Roads
Calcium Chloride Portland District Calcium Chloride Loughborough District
Street Sweeping Sunbury/Inverary Village
Shouldering Arterial Roads
Street Sweeping Verona/Hartington Village
Sewer Flushing Sunbury/Inverary Village Sewer Flushing Verona/Hartington Village Sewer Flushing Perth Road
New Village Signs CB/MH Cleaning Sydenham Village
Street Sweeping - Perth Road
CB/MH Cleaning Battersea Village
Calcium Chloride Bedford District
CB/MH Cleaning Sunbury/Inverary Village CB/MH Cleaning Verona/Hartington Village
Petworth Road
CB/MH Cleaning Perth Road 1st Round Seal Coats Surface Treatment LCB Roads
July 6 - 10
JULY
Sign Maintenance Local Roads Street Sweeping Local Roads
June 29 - 3
July 13 - 17
Green Bay Causeway
July 20 - 24
July 27 - 31
Aug 3 - 7 Arterial Road Mowing 2nd Cut
Bedford Various Areas
Aug 10 - 14
AUGUST
Sewer Flushing Sydenham Village Sewer Flushing Battersea Village
Street Sweeping Battersea Village
Calcium Chloride Storrington District
May 25 - 29
June 22 - 26
Guide Post Replacement Arterial Roads
Verona Medical CentreHartington Shed Construction of Roof First Floor Accesible Ramp
Centennial Park & Gerald Ball Park Tennis Courts
Keeley Road Garage
Aug 17 - 21
Gerald Ball ParkInstallation of Playground Equipment
Microsurfacing Perth Road & Hwy 38 (Outsourced)
Shouldering Arterial Roads Carrying Place Hinchinbrooke Road Culvert
Aug 24 - 28 Centennial Park 2nd Round Surface Multi-Purpose Treatment LCB Pad Roads
Aug 31 - 4 Culvert Replacement Various Locations
OCTOBER
SEPTEMBER
Sep 7 - 11
Sep 14 - 18
Sep 21 - 25
Certain Local Roads- 2nd Cut to fence
Sep 28 - 2
Ditching Loughborough District
Oct 5 - 9
Ditching - Portland District
Oct 12 - 16
Oct 19 - 23
Brushing Milburn Road & Ormsbee Road
Deyos Road and Bunker Hill Road
Davidson Beach Access Road
Ditching - Bedford District Ditching - Storrington District
Hinchinbrooke Road North Culvert (Outsourced)
Catch Basins
Town Hall Construction of Accesible Entrance Buck Bay Road Bridge (Outsourced)
Fish Creek Bridge (Outsourced)
Bunker Hill Road Bridge (Outsourced) Shouldering Arterial Roads
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Oct 26 - 30 Nov 2 - 5 Nov 9 - 13 Nov 16 - 20 Nov 23 - 27 Nov 30 - 4 Dec 7 - 11 Dec 14 - 18 Dec 21 - 25 Dec 28 - 1
Page 131 of 153
S:\Council Agendas\2020 Reports (Council&COTW)\June 16, 2020 Council\FINAL (CAO Approved)\Proposed 2020 Construction & Maintenance Schedule\2020 Schedule- FINAL (June 10, 2020)
Page 132 of 153
INFORMATION REPORT TO COUNCIL PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA DATE:
June 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
Tender No. PS-2020-20: 2020-2022 Screened Winter Sand
RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. BACKGROUND: A Screened Winter Sand Tender for 2020, 2021 and 2022 was prepared and advertised in the local paper and Biddingo.com. This Tender closed on June 3, 2020. K. Mulrooney Trucking Limited had the lowest bid for three out of the four patrol yards, for 2020 only. All other bids from K. Mulrooney Trucking Limited were low. The cumulative total overall for the lowest bid was from K. Mulrooney Trucking Limited. 2020 Screened Winter Sand
Bricaza
Bedford - 5,000 Cubic Yards
$13.75
Mulrooney $/Yd
$68,750.00 Sunbury - 3,000 Cubic Yards
$15.00
$59,650.00 $/Yd
$45,000.00 Hartington - 4,200 Cubic Yards
$12.80
TOTALS
$14.50
$13.49 $40,470.00
$/Yd
$53,760.00 Sydenham - 5,000 Cubic Yards
$11.93
$13.49 $56,658.00
$/Yd
$12.49
$72,500.00
$62,450.00
$240,010.00
$219,228.00
2021 Screened Winter Sand
Bricaza
Bedford - 5,000 Cubic Yards
$14.75
Mulrooney $/Yd
$73,750.00 Sunbury - 3,000 Cubic Yards
$16.00
$59,650.00 $/Yd
$48,000.00 Hartington - 4,200 Cubic Yards
$13.80 $57,960.00
$11.93
$13.49 $40,470.00
$/Yd
$13.49 $56,658.00
“Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader”
Page 133 of 153
INFORMATION REPORT TO COUNCIL PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Sydenham - 6,000 Cubic Yards
TOTALS
$15.50
$/Yd
$12.49
$93,000.00
$74,940.00
$272,710.00
$231,718.00
2022 Screened Winter Sand
Bricaza
Bedford - 5,000 Cubic Yards
$15.75
Mulrooney $/Yd
$78,750.00 Sunbury - 3,000 Cubic Yards
$17.00
$59,850.00 $/Yd
$51,000.00 Hartington - 4,200 Cubic Yards
$14.80
TOTALS
$16.50
$13.69 $41,070.00
$/Yd
$62,160.00 Sydenham - 6,000 Cubic Yards
$11.97
$13.69 $57,498.00
$/Yd
$12.69
$99,000.00
$76,140.00
$290,910.00
$234,558.00 *Totals do not include HST
South Frontenac has had success working with K. Mulrooney Trucking Limited in the past with screened winter sand. The Township has been completely satisfied with their product and delivery service. For this reason the Public Services Department has awarded the tender, through delegated authority, to K. Mulrooney Trucking Limited.
FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: $643,000 has been budgeted in 2020 for screened winter sand and salt combined. The cost of salt is not expected to exceed the remaining amount available from this budget line for 2020. ATTACHMENTS: N/A Submitted/approved by:
Prepared By:
Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Director of Public Services
Brian Kirk, CRS-I Operations Supervisor
Approved by: Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer “Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader”
Page 134 of 153
June 3, 2020 RE: B1. Centre Hastings motion for support for the role of Conservation Authorities (resolution attached) B2. City of Sault Ste. Marie motion for Support for Conservation Authorities (resolution attached) B3. Town of Ajax motion for supporting Conservation Authorities (resolution attached) Please be advised that Township of Puslinch Council, at its meeting held on April 22, 2020 considered the aforementioned topic and subsequent to discussion, the following was resolved: Resolution No. 2020-104:
Moved by Councillor Sepulis and Seconded by Councillor Bulmer
That the Intergovernmental Affairs correspondence Motions for Support items B1, B2, and B3 be received; and WHEREAS, the Township of Puslinch is committed to planning for a sustainable future for its resources and environment; AND WHEREAS Township of Puslinch is a member of the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) , Conservation Halton (CH), and the Hamilton Conservation Authority (HCA)and has representatives on each Board of Directors; AND WHEREAS the GRCA, CH, and HCA provide the Township of Puslinch with expert advice on the environmental impact of land use planning proposals and that the Township of Puslinch does not have staff with comparable expertise or experience; AND WHEREAS the GRCA, CH, and HCA (a) provide programs to the residents of Township of Puslinch that include recreation, education, water quality monitoring, reduction of vegetation loss and soil erosion, preservation of species at risk,
Page 135 of 153
(b) complete restoration projections as well as protect life and property through a variety of measures, all of which the Township of Puslinch does not have staff with comparable expertise or experience; THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED that the Township of Puslinch supports continuation of the programs of the GRCA, CH, and HCA both mandatory and non-mandatory; AND THAT this resolution be forwarded to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Premier Doug Ford, MPP Ted Arnott, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, GRCA, CH, HCA, Conservation Ontario and all Ontario municipalities. CARRIED As per the above resolution, please accept a copy of this correspondence for your information and consideration. Sincerely, Courtenay Hoytfox Deputy Clerk
Page 136 of 153 THE CORPORATION OF THE
MUNICIPALITY OF CENTRE HASTINGS PHONE: 613-473-4030 FAX: 613-473-5444
7 FURNACE ST., BOX 900 MADOC, ON K0K 2K0 www.centrehastings.com
March 18th, 2020 The Honourable Jeff Yurek Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks College Park 5th Floor, 777 Bay Street Toronto, ON M7A 2J3 Re: Resolution to Support the Role of Conservation Authorities Please be advised the Council of the Municipality of Centre Hastings at its regular meeting held on March 18th, 2020 passed the following resolution: WHEREAS the Lower Trent Conservation Authority and the Quinte Conservation Authority along with other Conservation Authorities have been protecting people and conserving and restoring watersheds with local communities for over 50 years, and WHEREAS municipalities must work together to ensure resilient and healthy watersheds for residents, and WHEREAS Conservation Authorities will be important partners in concrete and cost-effective initiatives to address the climate change, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
THAT the Municipality of Centre Hastings supports the important role Conservation Authorities provide to local communities in delivering watershed management programs. AND THAT the Municipality of Centre Hastings circulate that support to municipalities, conservation authorities and the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks in Ontario. Jennifer Nielsen Deputy Clerk
Page 137 of 153
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE
March 13, 2020
The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario The Honourable Jeff Yurek, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks The Honourable John Yakabuski, Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry Dear Premier Ford, Minister Yurek and Minister Yakabuski: RE: Support for Conservation Authorities You will find attached hereto a resolution passed by the Corporation of the City of Sault Ste. Marie City Council on March 9, 2020 regarding support for conservation authorities in Ontario. We trust that this matter will receive the appropriate time and attention from your respective offices. Yours truly,
Christian C. Provenzano, B.A., LL.B., LL.M CC
City Council Association of Municipalities of Ontario Conservation Ontario
P.O. Box 580, 99 Foster Drive ~ Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario ~ P6A 5N1 705-759-5344 ~ mayor.provenzano@cityssm.on.ca
Page 138 of 153
CITV COUNCIL RESOLUTION
Agenda Number:
8.1
Title:
Conservation Authorities
Date:
Monday, March 9,2020
Moved by:
Councillor M. Bruni
Seconded by:
Councillor R. Niro
Whereas the City of Sault Ste. Marie has been well served by the Sault Ste. Marie Region Conservation Authority; and Whereas Sault Ste. Marie values the efforts of the Conservation Authority to monitor floods, to manage source water protection and to ensure the integrity of the watersheds within our municipality and conserve our natural environment; and
Whereas the Province of Ontario is currently reviewing the mandate and operations of Conservation Authoritíes; and Whereas Conservation Authorities provide essential services to municipalities in their watersheds;
Now Therefore Be lt Resolved that the Council of the City of Sault Ste. Marie encourages the Province to continue to support the principle of planning on a watershed basis in the ongoing review and prioritize the allocation of adequate funding to support the core mandate of conservation authorities while preventing any downloading of costs to municípalities;
Further that the Province of Ontario be requested to maintain and not diminish the core mandate of Conservation Authorities; a nd
That this resolution be forwarded to Premier Doug Ford, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry, Conservation Ontario, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and all Ontario municipalíties.
Carried
Tied, Defeated
Defeated
Officially Read and Not Dealt With / Postponed
Page 139 of 153 TOWN OF AJAX 65 Harwood Avenue South Ajax ON L1S 3S9 www.ajax.ca
Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Room 281 Legislative Building, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1
March 5, 2020
Re:
Supporting Conservation Authorities
Please be advised that the following resolution was endorsed by Ajax Town Council at its Meeting held February 24, 2020: WHEREAS, the Town of Ajax is committed to planning for a sustainable future, protecting human life and property from natural hazards, and promoting environmental education and stewardship; AND WHEREAS the Town of Ajax is located within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) jurisdiction and has representatives on both Board of Directors; AND WHEREAS each respective Board of Directors determine the policies, priorities and budget of the TRCA and CLOCA; AND WHEREAS the TRCA and CLOCA provide valuable non-mandatory programs and services including expert advice on the environmental impacts associated with land use planning and source water protection, environmental restoration services, educational and recreational opportunities, and community engagement programs, in an efficient manner delivered at a watershed scale; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Ajax supports the continuation of both mandatory and non-mandatory programs and services provided by the TRCA and CLOCA, and that no programs or services of the TRCA or CLOCA, or the other Conservation Authorities in Ontario be “wound down” at this time; AND THAT the Province engage in early consultations with the TRCA, CLOCA, and other Conservation Authorities, and member municipalities including the Region of Durham, to fully understand the funding structure and local benefits of programs delivered by the Conservation Authorities; AND THAT a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario; Jeff Yurek, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks; Rod Philips, MPP Ajax; the Association of Municipalities of Ontario; the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority; Conservation Ontario; and all Ontario Municipalities.
Page 140 of 153
If you require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact Sean McCullough, Senior Planner, at 905-619-2529 ext. 3234 or sean.mccullugh@ajax.ca
Sincerely
Sarah Moore Acting Manager of Legislative Services/Deputy Clerk
Copy:
Jeff Yurek, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks Rod Philips, MPP Ajax Association of Municipalities of Ontario Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority Conservation Ontario; and S. McCullough, Senior Planner, all Ontario Municipalities
Page 141 of 153
June 5, 2020 RE: Mapleton Resolution 2020-04-14 to request the Province review the Farm Property Class Tax Rate Programme, dated May 27, 2020. a) Correspondence from Wellington Federation of Agriculture regarding Mapleton Resolution 2020-04-14, dated May 28, 2020. Please be advised that Township of Puslinch Council, at its meeting held on June 3, 2020 considered the aforementioned topic and subsequent to discussion, the following was resolved: Resolution No. 2020-151:
Moved by Councillor Sepulis and Seconded by Councillor Goyda
That the Intergovernmental Affairs correspondence items listed on the Council Agenda for JUNE 3, 2020 Council meeting be received; and Whereas the Township of Puslinch received correspondence from the Township of Mapleton with respect to requesting the Province of Ontario to review the Farm Property Class Tax Rate Programme in light of economic competitiveness concerns between rural and urban municipalities; BE IT RESOLVED that the Township of Puslinch hereby supports their Resolution 202004-14 passed on March 10, 2020; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this motion be sent to Hon. Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario, Hon. Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Hon. Rod Phillips, Minister of Finance, Hon. Ernie Hardeman, Minister of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, MPP Randy Pettapiece, Hon. Ted Arnott, all Ontario Municipalities, Rural Ontario Municipal Association (ROMA) and Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). CARRIED
Page 142 of 153
As per the above resolution, please accept a copy of this correspondence for your information and consideration. Sincerely, Courtenay Hoytfox Deputy Clerk
Page 143 of 153
A>_<_o.
«m...>zUm omm_mz>:oz
xu_m:m.8«<.
ammmmsmzam
moon:ma
3.m3_m«
..o,o:3. 02
23> E5
_.mm.m_m:<m 3; mS_n=3m. O.cmm:.m
u:”..3_m..m O38.
_.o:o._B_u_mUocm Ea.
mm_u:.m2 o+«mm.a z§mm.:m ~89 nocsnz..o.Em <::.n__um_:< Mm. ..:m n=n:m.8a «mmo::o: mnrma:m:….3. m«macaw» mcuuonm c<:5 m…..a..m o:o.9 Em <__:w.:<9. 23:3. xmmocwnmm man.uo«mm.Q< 8 mag uqonmacqmm mm .8 :n:am m .mn::m3m3 3 u3<Em mcu_uo.::m s\m:m:qm 5:35 :mm. «:m: v3<:n_m<m_m.:mnm3
2n>z4
m_Emm
mmon_m:o: 302.3 :.:n_um_
_c:_n.nm_Emm 2 0:310
w <mw mmmocqnmm Ea uo.mm:.< m .n:um_
35 Ea _.o:m:m
m$.:
3 3m .:_:_m?m:<mOm?mq
<.
33
m<_<3
ozm?
24 tom.q$–mo
min 303 H$-$mo
:-moo.~$.$_§
..:mno.uo…..:o: 2 3m <::n_um:< S «mmn zimaam no_m§c=Eum:m % z_Emm=.m 5 no.uo_.m:o: ocmmn HoH.-m.Em .oE:n: £32. mE.mmo.. 3.5 oz Em H3
a 0:320
mm»
_<m8..
Page 144 of 153
Page 145 of 153
Page 146 of 153
Page 147 of 153
Page 148 of 153
.
m?.
sm
:m
22.3;
0252
Page 149 of 153
Page 150 of 153
Page 151 of 153
Questions for Council from the Public regarding COVID-19 and Township Services JUNE 16, 2020
Do you have a pandemic related question for Council? 1.
Submitted at Wednesday June 3rd 2020 10:29 AM
Dear Folks: hope you are doing best you can, i have seen quite a few questions from folks asking about getting to seasonal dwellings and i understand your responses and i do understand the nature of my question is outside your control, But here goes, i am south of the border property owner as in a yankee ,, for close to fifty years now having been coming across, we of course are quite concerned about status of our property after long winter you are always anxious about condition, damage, critters, two and four feet, break in etc, i know i know this is border issue. i also have bills to pay on the place which is more difficult , which do add up. do you folks here of any relief for us property owners, it is very difficult to plan and asking on national level seems to yield no response, i get it, it is a tricky situation, and unfortunately ny governor has made it out to be massive tragedy, where as in upstate ny no one i have talked to knows anyone who has been sick, i do realize you have to protect against worse case scenario ( which we always say block the bridges coming out of NYC) , so all that being said any information you could pass along would be helpful, trying to “plan” around the 21st of june but no one is able to give a up or down signal on if property owners could come thru, thank you for your time , Devil Lake
Township Response: At this time the border remains closed to all non-essential travel. For the latest updates on the Federal Government’s travel restrictions related to COVID-19, refer to: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novelcoronavirus-infection/latest-travel-health-advice.html#foreign. This web page provides a virtual assistant and links and telephone numbers to use to obtain additional information. Local governments have no jurisdiction with respect to border entry for local property owners. If you have concerns about a property that you are unable to attend to due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we suggest you contact a local property management or maintenance company for assistance. 2.
Submitted at June 9th 2020 3:04 PM
Now that Ontario is permitting the running of children’s summer camps, is South Frontenac going to reconsider cancelling the day and swim camps at the Point this summer? Township Response: The Township of South Frontenac has made the difficult decision to cancel Swim and Day Camp programs for the 2020 season due to concerns surrounding COVID19. The cancellation comes after careful consideration from the Township’s Emergency Control Group (ECG) regarding the safety of South Frontenac residents and staff. The news release can be found here: https://www.southfrontenac.net/Modules/News/index.aspx?_mid_=5333&newsId=c0 43a20b-c42d-49d8-ad57-dbd5b6675dac Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 152 of 153
Questions for Council from the Public regarding COVID-19 and Township Services JUNE 16, 2020
Even though the Province announced that Summer Camps could resume, the Township and many other Municipalities have chosen to maintain the original decision due to the potential risk to staff and kids. It is important to note that the Province did also indicate that there would be strict requirements for those that chose to continue with offering Summer Camp programs. In reviewing the numerous requirements, which include substantially reduced participant numbers and constant physical distancing, it would be very difficult for the Township to be able to meet all of the criteria while offering quality programming and it would place a substantial burden on the student employees that typically deliver these programs. 3.
Submitted at June 10th, 2020 2:38 PM
With the province implementing its phase 2 openings does that mean that the beaches are now open for use with some restrictions? I understood Doug Ford to say that beaches were now able to open effective June 12, 2020. Township Response: The use of public beaches in the Township is permitted effective June 12, 2020. Plans for installing buoys at the beaches are being made, however docks will not be installed at this time to in order to promote physical distancing. Users of beaches and other facilities must adhere to the provincially mandated maximum of 10-person group size, physically distance themselves by two meters, and wear a mask in situations where physical distancing is challenging. A public service announcement with this and other Stage 2 Reopening information was released on Friday, June 12, 2020.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – A Progressive Rural Leader
Page 153 of 153
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2020-31 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of June 16, 2020 be confirmed.
Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed.
This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage.
Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 16 day of June, 2020. Read a first and second time this16 day of June, 2020. Read a third time and finally passed this 16 day of June, 2020.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
