Published December 19, 2023

Word Count 213225 words

Reading Time 1002 min read

Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: December 19, 2023 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2023/Council - 19 Dec 2023 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Page 1 of 470

Township of South Frontenac Council Meeting Agenda

TIME: DATE: PLACE:

6:30 PM, Tuesday, December 19, 2023 Council Chambers/Virtual Via Zoom .

Call to Order

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Approval of Agenda

Resolution

Scheduled Closed Session

Resolution - That Council resolve itself into the Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” to consider the following item: a) Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board - ByLaw Enforcement

Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board - ByLaw Enforcement

Resolution - That Council rise from the Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” without reporting.

Recess

Public Meeting

Resolution - Public Meeting to Order (Proposed Amendments to Bylaw 2017-76)  The Council of The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac will host a public meeting on December 19, 2023, at 7 p.m. on proposed amendments to By-law 2017-76 which provides for the governing the proceedings of Council, the conduct of members and the calling of meetings. The amendments are related to proposed changes to allow staff delegated authority to remove holding provisions and to clarify the Notice of Motion process. Notice of Collection

b) c)

Public Meeting - Proposed Amendments to By-law 2017-76. (See Business Item 12. B)

Resolution - Close Public Meeting

Resolution - Public Meeting to Order (Zoning By-law Amendments)

Notice of Collection

Public Meeting for Zoning By-law Amendment Application - PL-ZBA2023-0133, Broome and Malloy, 4839 Noble Lane  This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0133 for 4839

6 - 49

50 - 55

Page 2 of 470

Noble Lane. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) to a Limited Service Residential – Waterfront Special Provision zone (RLSW-XX). h)

Public Meeting for Zoning By-law Amendment Application - PL-ZBA2023-0131, AlinkA Group Inc., 41 Bresee Road  This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0131 for 41 Bresee Road. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Rural (RU) to a Rural Special Provision zone (RU-XX).

56 - 62

Public Meeting for Zoning By-law Amendment - Application PL-ZBA2023-0102, SNZ Holdings (Fotenn), 1425 Rutledge Road  This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0102 for 1425 Rutledge Road. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Rural (RU) to a Rural Special Provision zone (RU-XX).

63 - 69

Zoning By-law Amendment Application - PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District  This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092 for 2348 Sands Road. If approved, the zone on the subject lands would be changed from Urban Residential – First Density (UR1) to Urban Residential – First Density – Special Provision (UR1-25 and UR1-26).  Council will review the proposal and invite public input at the statutory public meeting. Staff are recommending that Council pass a by-law during the Council meeting in which the public meeting is held, per Procedural By-law as Amended by Bylaw 2023-44, as the planning matter is technical in nature (i.e. it fulfills a condition of consent approval).

70 - 77

Resolution - Close Public Meeting

Delegations

Briefings

Approval of Minutes

Resolutions

Reports Requiring Action

Drinking Water Quality Management System: Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan

78 - 81

82 137

That Council receive the Sydenham Drinking Water System Management Review Summary Report 2022, Management Review Meeting Minutes and Audit Report; and That Council re-endorse the Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the Owner and Top Management Endorsement of the Operational Plan for Sydenham’s Drinking Water Supply Systems document showing Council’s endorsement of the plan. b)

2024 Budget

138 159

Page 3 of 470

That Council approve and adopt the combined 2024 Capital and Operating budgets requiring $22,474,275 to be raised by taxation, as attached. c)

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) Report

160 169

That Council approves the Asset Retirement Obligation Policy presented with this report that establishes guidelines to ensure compliance with the new standard PSAB PS 3280. d)

Cloud Server Migration RFP

170 172

That Council support awarding the Migration to a Cloud- Hosted Server contract in the amount of $85,104.74 including non-rebatable HST to IC 360 Solutions Inc. e)

2024 Summer Student Compensation Change

173 174

That Council provide approval for the Summer Student Wage Grid for 2024 itemized under Table 1 of the Staff Report. f)

Request for Speed Limit Reduction – Storrington Public School  The purpose of this report is to provide background on a request for a speed limit reduction on Battersea Road that was recently received from the Storrington Public School.

175 193

Updated Asset Management Plan

194 423

That Council approve the 2023 Asset Management Plan as attached in the staff report. 11.

Advisory Committee Reports or Minutes

Reports Requiring Approval of By-laws

Dedication of 0.3 metre Reserves Abutting Orser Street, Subdivision Plan 1548

424 430

That By-law 2023-100 to dedicate portions of the 0.3 metre reserve along Orser Street, Plan 1548, legally described therein, be given first and second reading; and That By-law 2023-100 be given third reading, signed and sealed. b)

Proposed Amendments to Council Procedure By-law, By-law 201776, As Amended regarding Delegated Authority (holding symbols) and Notice of Motion Process

431 437

That By-law 2023-92, being a By-law to amend By-Law 2017-76, As Amended, “A ByLaw To Provide For Governing The Proceedings Of The Council, The Conduct Of Members And The Calling Of Meetings”, be given first and second reading; and That By-law 2023-92 be given third reading, signed and sealed. c)

Deeming By-law Applications PL-LC-2022-0089 (St. Pierre), PL-LC2022-0090 (Conn), PL-LC-2022-0151 (Stover), Plan 716

438 444

That By-laws 2023-101, 2023-102 and 2023-103 deeming the properties described as Lots 53, 54, and 55, Plan 716, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac not be lots in a plan of subdivision, be given first and second reading; and

Page 4 of 470

That By-laws 2023-101, 2023-102 and 2023-103 be given third reading, signed and sealed. d)

Parkland Dedication By-law Update

445 450

That the report regarding the new Parkland Dedication By-law be received; and, That the new Parkland Dedication By-law (By-law 2023-104) included with this report as Attachment 1 be given first and second reading; and, That By-law 2023-104 be given third reading, signed and sealed. e)

Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Z-21-29, Estate of Everett Orser (Keith Orser), Part of Lot 3, Concession 8, Loughborough

451 461

That By-law 2023-105 to amend the zoning on the lands at Part of Lot 3, Concession 8, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading; and That By-law 2023-105 be given third reading, signed and sealed. f)

462 469

That By-law 2023-106 to amend the zoning on lands known as 2348 Sands Road, Part of Lot 8, Concession 9, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading; and That By-law 2023-106 be given third reading, signed and sealed. 13.

Reports for Information

Committee of the Whole

Information Items

Notice of Motions

Rise and Report regarding County Council and External Boards

County Council

Police Services Board

Cataraqui Conservation

Quinte Conservation

Page 5 of 470

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority

Frontenac Community Arena Board

Announcements/Statements by Councillors

Closed Session (if requested)

Resolution - That Council resolve itself into the Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” to consider the following items: a) Approval of the December 5, 2023 Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” minutes. b) A position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. c) Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees - Recruitment. Approval of the December 5, 2023 Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” minutes.

b) c)

Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees - Recruitment.

A position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board.

Resolution - That Council rise from the Committee of the Whole “Closed Meeting” without reporting.

Confirmatory By-law

Resolution

Adjournment

Resolution Natural, Vibrant and Growing - A Progressive Rural Leader

470

Public Meeting under the Planning Act

Tuesday, December 19, 2023 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting

Page 6 of 470

Applications for Zoning By-law Amendment PL-ZBA-2023-0092 PL-ZBA-2023-0102 PL-ZBA-2023-0131 PL-ZBA-2023-0133

Public Meeting Statement • The purpose of this public meeting is to hear comments on Zoning By-Law Amendment Applications PL-ZBA-2023-0092, PL-ZBA-2023-0102, PL-ZBA-2023-0131 and PL-ZBA2023-0133. • If a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions at this public meeting, or make written submissions to South Frontenac Township before any by-law is passed, the person or public body may not be added to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal, there are reasonable grounds to do so. • If you wish to be notified of the decision of Council in respect to the application, you must submit a written request to the Clerk by email care of planning@southfrontenac.net. This will also entitle you to be advised of an Ontario Land Tribunal appeal. Page 7 of 470

• Anyone may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The appeal must be filed with the Clerk within 20 days of the notice of decision. The notice of appeal must set out the reasons for the appeal and be accompanied by the fee required by the Tribunal.

Meeting Format • Planner reviews proposal and delivers report • Open discussion • Council questions • Public questions and comments • Council comments Page 8 of 470

• Close public meeting

PL-ZBA-2023-0133 Applicant: Frances Broome and Gary Malloy Property: 4839 Noble Lane, Battersea

Page 9 of 470

Location

Page 10 of 470

Proposal • Designation – Settlement Area • Existing Zone – RLSW • Proposed Zone – RLSW-XX

Chicken Coop

• Add accessory uses • Chicken Coop • Keeping a maximum of five (5) chickens

• Add Zone Provisions for Chicken Coop • 70m Highwater Mark Setback • 70m Front Yard • 15m Interior Side Yard Page 11 of 470

View from Shoreline

View from Lane Page 12 of 470

Chicken Coop

Photo Credit: Frances Broome

Page 13 of 470

The chickens

Department and Public Comments • Public Services, Building Services and Cataraqui Conservation – no comments • Public – several individuals on Noble Lane and the immediate area wrote in support of the application, noting

• Noble Lane runs over a farm property where several different type of livestock are raised • Keeping a few chickens in the backyard is in line with the rural character of the Township, • The chickens are kept in an enclosed area • These particular chickens are more like pets than livestock • Chickens should be allowed anywhere in Township as long as they are treated humanely and are not a nuisance Page 14 of 470

Policy Framework Provincial Policy Statement Frontenac County Official Plan Township of South Frontenac Official Plan

• Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas • Waterfront areas • Agricultural uses

Page 15 of 470

Next Steps • South Frontenac Council should receive comments from the public • A report with a recommendation will be brought to a future Council meeting

Page 16 of 470

Open Discussion 1. 2. 3.

Council Questions Public Questions and Comments Council Comments

If you are joining virtually and would like to speak:

Page 17 of 470

• Use “Raise Hand” feature at the bottom of your screen. • Dial*9 (star nine) for phone. • Please wait to speak until you hear your name and your microphone has been unmuted.

PL-ZBA-2023-0131

Applicant: AlinkA Group Inc. Agent: Kim Donovan Property: 41 Bresee Road

Page 18 of 470

Location

Page 19 of 470

Proposal • Designation – Rural and Environmental Protection • Existing Zone – RU • Proposed Zone – RU-XX • Add uses: • A community service and community facility • Ex. learning centre, summer camp, dormitory, campsites, associated cooking and eating facilities, associated play areas, accessory uses

Page 20 of 470

• A retail store • A craft shop • A studio • A nursery or garden centre • A resort, including a health spa • A private or commercial club

Page 21 of 470

View from Westport Road

Page 22 of 470

Department and Public Comments • Public Services – no objection, technical review and feedback on matters such as traffic, parking and stormwater management would be provided at the site plan control stage if/when it is applied • Building Services – comments regarding Ontario Building Code requirements are forthcoming • Public – Mr. Scanlan (74 Bresee Road) noted that the map identifies the proposed zone would apply to one of his properties, and does not want the zone changed for his property. Page 23 of 470

Policy Framework Provincial Policy Statement Frontenac County Official Plan Township of South Frontenac Official Plan

• Leverage rural amenities and assets • Promote diversification of economic base and employment opportunities • Provide opportunities for sustainable and diversified tourism Page 24 of 470

Next Steps • South Frontenac Council should receive comments from the public • A report with a recommendation will be brought to a future Council meeting

Page 25 of 470

Open Discussion 1. 2. 3.

Council Questions Public Questions and Comments Council Comments

If you are joining virtually and would like to speak:

Page 26 of 470

• Use “Raise Hand” feature at the bottom of your screen. • Dial*9 (star nine) for phone. • Please wait to speak until you hear your name and your microphone has been unmuted.

PL-ZBA-2023-0102 Applicant: SNZ Holdings Inc. Agent: Fotenn Property: 1425 Rutledge Road

Page 27 of 470

Context ∕

Primarily rural uses surround site

∕

Located north of Loughborough Lake

Page 28 of 470

Subject Site Existing dwelling on southern edge of the property

∕

Lot area of approximately 100 hectares

∕

Accessed via Darling Lane

∕

Approximately 2,570 metres of water frontage on Loughborough Lake 24

Page 29 of 470

∕

Official Plan ∕

Designated Rural Lands with Environmental Protection and Provincially Significant Wetlands

∕

Intended to accommodate agricultural, recreational, and residential uses

Page 30 of 470

Current Zoning Rural (RU) Zone ∕ ∕ ∕

a single detached dwelling home occupation/industry various agricultural enterprises

Health retreat / yoga facility not included within the uses permitted for home occupation or home industry

Environmental Protection (EP) Zone

Page 31 of 470

Intent of the Application ∕

A yoga and holistic retreat in the existing twostorey, singledetached dwelling

∕

No new development proposed

∕

Access will continue via Darling Lane Page 32 of 470

Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Rezone from RU to Site-specific Rural (RU-X-H) Zone •

EP Zone will remain unchanged

•

Yoga and Holistic Retreat included as a permitted use and defined

•

Parking reduction to reflect size of existing dwelling

•

Holding Symbol subject to site plan control agreement

Page 33 of 470

Summary – Good Land Use Planning Applications to permit the existing dwelling to be used as a yoga and holistic retreat.

•

No new development or site alterations are proposed.

•

Zoning By-law Amendment will permit the proposed uses.

•

Site-specific zoning to ensure a yoga and holistic retreat is defined and permitted as a primary use.

•

Technical considerations will be addressed through the site plan control process (e.g., access from private lane, etc.).

Page 34 of 470

•

Page 35 of 470

Existing Building Use for Yoga and Holistic Retreat

Page 36 of 470

Representative Photo of Access Lane

Department and Public Comments • Public Services – no objection as access is from an existing entrance location and follows a pre-defined road location • Building Services – the existing sewage system is adequately sized for proposed use • Cataraqui Conservation – no objection • Public – none received

Page 37 of 470

Policy Framework Provincial Policy Statement Frontenac County Official Plan Township of South Frontenac Official Plan

• Leverage rural amenities and assets • Lake trout lake • Water and sewage services

Page 38 of 470

Next Steps • South Frontenac Council should receive comments from the public • A report with a recommendation will be brought to a future Council meeting

Page 39 of 470

Open Discussion 1. 2. 3.

Council Questions Public Questions and Comments Council Comments

If you are joining virtually and would like to speak:

Page 40 of 470

• Use “Raise Hand” feature at the bottom of your screen. • Dial*9 (star nine) for phone. • Please wait to speak until you hear your name and your microphone has been unmuted.

PL-ZBA-2023-0092 Applicant: Karen Itterman Property: 2348 Sands Road, Battersea

Page 41 of 470

Location

Page 42 of 470

Proposal • Severance of one residential lot approved in July 2023 • Designation – Settlement Area • Existing Zone – UR1 • Proposed Zones: • UR1-25 on Retained Parcel

UR1-26 UR1-25

• 0.6ha (1.4ac) area • 73m (239.5ft) frontage

• 67m (219.8 ft) frontage

Page 43 of 470

• UR1-26 on Severed Parcel

Retained Parcel

Severed Parcel Page 44 of 470

Department and Public Comments • Public Services and Building Services – no objection to the consent application • Public – none received

Page 45 of 470

Planning Analysis • Provincial Policy Statement, County Official Plan and Township Official Plan encourage growth in rural settlement areas • Minimum 0.8ha (2 acre) lot area required for new lots • Ensures adequate well and sewage system separation • Original parcel (1977) was 0.4ha in size with 45 m frontage before a lot addition (1994) • Retained parcel would have 0.6ha lot area and 73m frontage • Severed parcel would have 67m frontage to achieve satisfactory geometric design • Committee of Adjustment approved consent that does not conform to Official Plan and Zoning By-law • Council may consider the deficient lot area/frontage by changing the zone on the lots Page 46 of 470

Next Steps • South Frontenac Council should receive comments from the public • Staff recommendation to pass a by-law tonight

Page 47 of 470

Open Discussion 1. 2. 3.

Council Questions Public Questions and Comments Council Comments

If you are joining virtually and would like to speak:

Page 48 of 470

• Use “Raise Hand” feature at the bottom of your screen. • Dial*9 (star nine) for phone. • Please wait to speak until you hear your name and your microphone has been unmuted.

Adjourn Public Meeting

Page 49 of 470

Page 50 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject:

Public Meeting for Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0133, Broome and Malloy, 4839 Noble Lane

Summary This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0133 for 4839 Noble Lane. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) to a Limited Service Residential – Waterfront Special Provision zone (RLSW-XX). Consistent with Council’s Procedural By-law, Council will receive comments from the public on the application through the public meeting. Staff will bring a more detailed report considering applicable policy and public comments, as well as providing a recommendation to Council on this application at a future meeting.

Recommendation This report is for information only.

Background The purpose of the proposed by-law is to amend the RLSW zone on the subject property to specifically list a chicken coop and the keeping of a maximum of five chickens as a permitted accessory use. The effect of the RLSW-XX zone would be to allow the owners to keep a maximum of five chickens on the subject property. Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from the public on the proposed rezoning.

Property Description The subject property is located within the Battersea Settlement Area. The subject property is approximately 2.5 acres in area with 24 metres (80 feet) of frontage on Noble Lane and 114 metres (375 feet) of frontage on Loughborough Lake. The lands are being renaturalized. The property contains a house, two detached garages and a chicken coop with a run. The chicken coop is located between a garage and the lane, approximately 36.5 www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 51 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZBA-2023-0133, Broome and Malloy, 4839 Noble Lane

metres (120 feet) from the lane, 70 metres (230 feet) from the shoreline, and 15 metres (50 feet) from the nearest side lot line. Five chickens are being kept on the property.

Related Applications The property is not subject to any other applications under the Planning Act.

Department and Agency Comments This application did not require circulation to Township departments due to the property’s location on a private lane and the nature of the request. Cataraqui Conservation did not require circulation due to the proposed location of the chicken coop on the property.

Public Comments Written comments were received from several individuals who own property and live on Noble Lane or in the immediate area. These individuals are supportive of the applicant’s desire to continue to raise chickens on the subject property. They noted that Noble Lane runs over a farm property where several different types of livestock are raised, that keeping a few chickens in the backyard is in line with the rural character of the Township, that the chickens are kept in an enclosed area, and that these particular chickens are more like pets than livestock.

Financial Implications Not applicable.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report.

☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A

Climate Considerations ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative supports climate change mitigation/adaption efforts in South Frontenac; and/or impacts the Township’s resilience to climate change.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 52 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZBA-2023-0133, Broome and Malloy, 4839 Noble Lane

Notice/Consultation Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, 20 days in advance of the Public Meeting. This included notice given: • • • •

by mail to every owner of land within 120 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by posting on the Township’s Current Planning Application webpage by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Application and Supporting Documents The application and supporting documents (if any) can be accessed through the Township’s CivicWeb Document Center, https://southfrontenac.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/90083/

Attachments

Draft By-law

Approvals Report Prepared By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner

Submitted By:

Brad Wright Director of Development Services

Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 53 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2023-## BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LAND FROM LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL – WATERFRONT (RLSW) TO LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL – WATERFRONT – SPECIAL PROVISION (RLSW-XX) ON LANDS DESCRIBED AS 4839 NOBLE LANE, PART LOT 7, CONCESSION 9, DISTRICT OF STORRINGTON WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990 as amended, the Council of a Municipality may enact by-laws regulating the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures thereon; AND WHEREAS By-law 2003-75 being the Zoning By-law regulates the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures within the Township of South Frontenac; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac considered all written and oral submissions received on this application, the effect of which helped Council make an informed decision; AND that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, hereby enacts as follows: 1.

THAT Schedule “H” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) to Limited Service Residential – Waterfront – Special Provision (RLSW-XX) for the lands shown on Schedule “1”.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RLSW-XX (4839 Noble Lane, Part of Lot 7, Concession 9, District of Storrington) immediately after the last Limited Service Residential – Waterfront – Special Provision section to read as follows: RLSW-XX (4839 Noble Lane, Part of Lot 7, Concession 9, District of Storrington) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10 or any other provision of this Bylaw to the contrary, the lands zoned Special Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW-XX) shall be used in accordance with the following: •

In addition to the Permitted Uses in Section 10.2, the following accessory uses are permitted: o Chicken Coop o Keeping a maximum of five (5) chickens

•

Zone Provisions for Chicken Coop o Setback from highwater mark (Minimum) o Front Yard (Minimum) o Interior Side Yard (Minimum)

70 metres (230 ft.) 70 metres (230 ft.) 15 metres (50 ft.)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. 3.

THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by said Section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this # day of MONTH, YEAR. Read a first and second time this # day of MONTH, YEAR. Read a third time and finally passed this # day of MONTH, YEAR.

Page 54 of 470 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 55 of 470 Schedule 1 This is Schedule “1” to By-law No. 2023-##.

Passed this # day of MONTH, YEAR

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 56 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject:

Public Meeting for Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0131, AlinkA Group Inc., 41 Bresee Road

Summary This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0131 for 41 Bresee Road. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Rural (RU) to a Rural Special Provision zone (RU-XX). Consistent with Council’s Procedural By-law, Council will receive comments from the public on the application through the public meeting. Staff will bring a more detailed report considering applicable policy and public comments, as well as providing a recommendation to Council on this application at a future meeting.

Recommendation This report is for information only.

Background The purpose of the proposed by-law is to amend the Rural (RU) zone on the property. The list of permitted uses would be expanded to include a retail store, a craft shop, a nursery or garden centre, a resort including a health spa, a private or commercial club, a studio, and a community service and community facility (e.g. learning centre). The effect of the by-law would be to allow a non-profit community campus and social/spiritual hub for people from the community and beyond to come learn, share and practice skills based around agriculture, ecology, culture and the arts, and to enjoy nature. The campus would provide classes in life skills and artistic expression to mixed ability individuals including developmentally challenged youth and adults. The proposed expanded uses would have dual purposes – part of the learning centre but also independent of the learning centre. For example, the learning centre would have a craft shop where people would come to learn a craft such as pottery, but the craft shop could also be used by professional/amateur potters to make and sell their goods. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 57 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZBA-2023-0131, AlinkA Group Inc., 41 Bresee Road

Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from the public on the proposed rezoning. Property Description The subject property is approximately 184 acres in area with 520 metres of frontage on Westport Road and 400 metres of frontage on Bresee Road. It consists of forest, wetland and fields. The property contains a house and two barns. The two barns are used for recreational, event gatherings and storage uses. There are also several small accessory buildings. Related Applications The property is not subject to any other applications under the Planning Act. Supporting Documentation Planning Justification Report A Planning Justification Report (Richard Doherty, November 20, 2023) was submitted in support of the application. The report explained how the property is currently used and its proposed use. The report assessed the appropriateness of the proposed zoning by-law amendment in the context of the surrounding area as well as its conformity with the applicable policy and regulatory framework. Department and Agency Comments Public Services had no concerns with the proposal, noting that their technical review and feedback on matters such as traffic, parking and stormwater management would be provided at the site plan control stage if/when it is applied. Building Services comments regarding Ontario Building Code requirements are forthcoming. Their review will not impact the proposed zoning by-law amendment but would inform future site layout and building design considerations. Public Comments Mr. Bob Scanlan (74 Bresee Road) raised concerns that the notice map identified that the proposed zone would be applied to one of his properties. Mr. Scanlan provided documentation of ownership and property location. Staff can use the documentation provided to ensure that his land will remain zoned Rural if the subject application is approved.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 58 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZBA-2023-0131, AlinkA Group Inc., 41 Bresee Road

Financial Implications Not applicable.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report.

☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A

Attachments

Draft By-law

Approvals Report Prepared By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 59 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL-ZBA-2023-0131, AlinkA Group Inc., 41 Bresee Road

Submitted By:

Brad Wright Director of Development Services Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 60 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2023-XX BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LAND FROM RURAL (RU) TO RURAL – SPECIAL PROVISION (RU-XX) ON LANDS DESCRIBED AS 41 BRESEE ROAD, PART LOTS 19 AND 20, CONCESSION 11, DISTRICT OF BEDFORD WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990 as amended, the Council of a Municipality may enact by-laws regulating the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures thereon; AND WHEREAS By-law 2003-75 being the Zoning By-law regulates the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures within the Township of South Frontenac; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac considered all written and oral submissions received on this application, the effect of which helped Council make an informed decision; AND that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, hereby enacts as follows: 1.

THAT Schedule “D” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Rural (RU) to Rural – Special Provision (RU-XX) for the lands shown on Schedule “1”.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RU-XX (Part of Lots 19 and 20, Concession 11, District of Bedford) immediately after the last Rural – Special Provision section to read as follows: RU-XX (Part of Lots 19 and 20, Concession 11, District of Bedford) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, the lands zoned Special Rural (RU-XX) shall be used in accordance with the following: •

In addition to the Permitted Uses in Section 7.2, the following uses are permitted: o A community service and community facility  For example, a learning centre, summer camp, dormitory, campsites, associated cooking and eating facilities, associated play areas, accessory uses to the above o A retail store o A craft shop o A studio o A nursery or garden centre o A resort, including a health spa o A private or commercial club

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. 3.

Page 61 of 470 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 62 of 470 Schedule 1 This is Schedule “1” to By-law No. 2023-XX

Passed this # day of MONTH, YEAR

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 63 of 470

To: Council Prep a red by: Development Services Department Da t e of Meet ing: December 19, 2023 Public Meet ing for Zoning By-la w Am endment Applica t ion Subject : PL-ZBA-202 3-0102 , SNZ Holdings (Fot enn), 1425 Rut ledg e Roa d

Summ ary This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0102 for 1425 Rutledge Road. If approved, the zone on the property would be changed from Rural (RU) to a Rural Special Provision zone (RU-XX). Consistent with Council’s Procedural By-law, Council will receive comments from the public on the application through the public meeting. Staff will bring a more detailed report considering applicable policy and public comments, as well as providing a recommendation to Council on this application at a future meeting.

Recom m enda t ion This report is for information only.

Ba ckg round The purpose of the application is to add a yoga and holistic retreat as a permitted use in the Rural zone on the subject property. The yoga and holistic retreat would be established within the existing dwelling on the property. The by-law would also place a holding symbol on the lands for this use, to be removed only once there is confirmation of legal deeded access to the subject lands, and a site plan control agreement has been executed and registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township. Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from the public on the proposed rezoning. Prop ert y Des cript ion The subject property is approximately 250 acres in area with more than 2,500 metres of frontage on Loughborough Lake. It consists of forest, wetland and fields. The property

w w w .s out hfrontenac.net

Natural, Vibrant and Grow ing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 64 of 470 Tow nship of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL- ZBA- 2 0 2 3 - 0 1 0 2 , SNZ Hold ing s (Fotenn), 1 4 2 5 Rutledge Road

contains a 475 square metre footprint, two storey dwelling and a picnic shelter near the lake. Rela t ed Ap plica t ions The property is not subject to any other applications under the Planning Act. Sup port ing Docum ent a t ion A planning justification report and Building Code letter were submitted in support of the application. Planning Justification Report A Planning Justification Report (Fotenn, July 31, 2023) was submitted in support of the application. The report assessed the appropriateness of the proposed zoning by-law amendment in the context of the surrounding area as well as its conformity with the applicable policy and regulatory framework. Building Code Letter A letter (Morrison Hershfield, April 24, 2023) was also submitted that reviewed the proposed change of use from a single family residence to a yoga retreat against the Ontario Building Code. The consultant concluded that the building would comply with the Ontario Building Code, but recommended voluntarily provision of a fire alarm system, and the provision of additional exits. Dep a rt m ent a nd Ag e ncy Comm ent s Public Services had no concerns with the proposal, on the understanding that road access is proposed from an existing entrance location at 1423 Rutledge Road and that the access plans to follow a pre-defined road location on the properties. Building Services determined that the proposed change of use of the building will not reduce the performance level of the existing sewage system (i.e. it is adequately sized). Cataraqui Conservation staff indicated on November 8, 2023, that they had no objection to the application within the context of natural hazard and stormwater management policies, and O. Reg. 148/06 under the Conservation Authorities Act. They note that CRCA permit approval will be required if upgrades or changes are proposed to the existing access road. Pub lic Com m ent s No comments were received from the public at the time of writing this report. w w w .s out hfrontenac.net

Natural, Vibrant and Grow ing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 65 of 470 Tow nship of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL- ZBA- 2 0 2 3 - 0 1 0 2 , SNZ Hold ing s (Fotenn), 1 4 2 5 Rutledge Road

Fina ncia l Im plica t ions Not applicable.

Rela t ionship t o St ra t eg ic Pla ns ☒ Not applicable to this report.

☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A

Clima t e Considerat ions ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative supports climate change mitigation/adaption efforts in South Frontenac; and/or impacts the Township’s resilience to climate change.

Not ice/Consult a t ion Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was given pursuant to the requirements of the Planning Act, 20 days in advance of the Public Meeting. This included notice given: • • • •

Applica t ion a nd Support ing Docum ent s The application and supporting documents (if any) can be accessed through the Township’s CivicWeb Document Center, https://southfrontenac.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/90083/

At t a chm ent s

Draft By-law 2023-XX

Approva ls Rep ort Prepa red By: Christine W oods, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner

w w w .s out hfrontenac.net

Natural, Vibrant and Grow ing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 66 of 470 Tow nship of South Frontenac Staff Report - PL- ZBA- 2 0 2 3 - 0 1 0 2 , SNZ Hold ing s (Fotenn), 1 4 2 5 Rutledge Road

Sub m it t ed By:

Brad W right Director of Development Services Ap p roved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

w w w .s out hfrontenac.net

Natural, Vibrant and Grow ing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 67 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2023-## BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LAND FROM RURAL (RU) TO RURAL – SPECIAL PROVISION (RU-XX-H) ON LANDS DESCRIBED AS 1425 RUTLEDGE ROAD, PART LOTS 15 TO 17, CONCESSION 4, DISTRICT OF LOUGHBOROUGH WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990 as amended, the Council of a Municipality may enact by-laws regulating the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures thereon; AND WHEREAS By-law 2003-75 being the Zoning By-law regulates the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures within the Township of South Frontenac; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac considered all written and oral submissions received on this application, the effect of which helped Council make an informed decision; AND that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, hereby enacts as follows: 1.

THAT Schedule “B” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Rural (RU) to Rural – Special Provision (RU-XX-H) for the lands shown on Schedule “1”.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RU-XX-H (Part of Lots 15 to 17, Concession 4, District of Loughborough) immediately after the last Rural – Special Provision section to read as follows: RU-XX-H (Part of Lots 15 to 17, Concession 4, District of Loughborough) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, the lands zoned Special Rural (RU-XX) shall be used in accordance with the following: •

In addition to the Permitted Uses in Section 7.2, the following uses are permitted: o Yoga and Holistic Retreat

•

Definition o “Yoga and Holistic Retreat” shall mean a building or part thereof wherein the business of a yoga and holistic retreat is carried on. Without limiting the generality of this type of use, such services as a business office, therapeutic massage, yoga practice, health and food counselling and therapy, may be located therein.

•

Zone Provisions o Off-street Parking Spaces (Minimum)

8 (Eight)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol The Holding (H) Symbol shall be removed to permit a yoga and holistic retreat use only once there is confirmation of legal deeded access to the subject lands, and a site plan control agreement has been executed and registered on the title of the property to the satisfaction of the Township.

Page 68 of 470 3.

THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by said Section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this # day of MONTH, YEAR Read a first and second time this # day of MONTH, YEAR Read a third time and finally passed this # day of MONTH, YEAR THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 69 of 470 Schedule 1 This is Schedule “1” to By-law No. 2023-##.

Passed this # day of MONTH, YEAR

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 70 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject:

Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District

Summary This report provides Council with information about Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092 for 2348 Sands Road. If approved, the zone on the subject lands would be changed from Urban Residential – First Density (UR1) to Urban Residential – First Density – Special Provision (UR1-25 and UR1-26). Council will review the proposal and invite public input at the statutory public meeting. Staff are recommending that Council pass a by-law during the Council meeting in which the public meeting is held, per Procedural By-law as Amended by By-law 2023-44, as the planning matter is technical in nature (i.e. it fulfills a condition of consent approval).

Recommendation THAT By-law 2023-106 to amend the zoning on lands known as 2348 Sands Road, Part of Lot 8, Concession 9, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading; and That By-law 2023-106 be given third reading, signed and sealed.

Background The subject application is related to consent application PL-BDJ-2023-0029 for the creation of one new lot. The consent application was approved by the Committee of Adjustment on July 13, 2023. The purpose of the rezoning application is to implement a condition that requires the parcels to be rezoned. This change would permit the severed parcel to have a minimum 67 m frontage, and the retained parcel to have a minimum 73 m frontage and 0.6 ha lot area, whereas a minimum 76 m frontage and 0.8 ha lot area is generally required. Under the Planning Act, a public meeting is required to be held to receive comments from the public on the proposed rezoning.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 71 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District

Property Description The subject property is located on Sands Road in the Battersea Settlement Area. The lands are forested, and generally level. A house and detached garage are located on the far east end of the property. The property is surrounded by residential land uses.

Department and Agency Comments Public Services and Building Services were not circulated the rezoning application as they had no objection to the approval of the consent application.

Public Comments No comments were received from the public at the time of writing this report.

Planning Analysis The proposed zoning by-law amendment was assessed against the applicable policies of the Provincial Policy Statement 2020, County of Frontenac Official Plan, and Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, as well as the provisions of Zoning By-law No. 2003-75. The Committee of Adjustment had consideration for these planning documents in the decision to grant provisional approval to the consent application. The Provincial Policy Statement 2020 (PPS) states that rural settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. The PPS also states that planning authorities must consider rural characteristics, the scale of development and the provision of appropriate service levels when directing development in rural settlement areas. The County of Frontenac Official Plan supports the PPS policies, encouraging the Township to promote mixed use development including residential, commercial, institutional, parks and employment areas (section 3.2). The Township of South Frontenac Official Plan also intends that a majority of new growth will be directed to existing settlement areas where it can be supported by appropriate servicing (section 5.6). The original parcel was created in 1977. It was 0.4 hectares (1 acre) in size with 45 metres of frontage. The dwelling was constructed in the 1980s. The parcel was enlarged to the current size (2.5 hectares) and configuration through a lot addition in 1994. According to the Owner and Township records, the lot addition was from a larger parcel that was divided equally between family members. The Owner’s intent is to divide the property so that as

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 72 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District

much as possible of the lands are included with the severed parcel so that it stays with family over the long term. Section 5.6.1 (ii)(b) of the Township Official Plan states that the minimum lot area for lots shall not be less than 0.8 hectares (2 acres) when serviced by a private well and private sanitary sewage system. The land division policies (Section 7.1) echo the requirement for minimum lot areas for lots created through consent (i.e. for the severed parcel). The UR1 zone also requires a minimum 0.8 hectare (2 acre) lot area. The subject property is an L-shape. The severed parcel would be the deeper part of the lot (the “stick” of the L), while the retained parcel would be shallower part (the “base” of the L). The severed parcel would be a minimum of 1.9 hectares in area, which exceeds the minimum lot area requirements. In order to achieve a satisfactory geometric design of the severed and retained parcels, and to maximize the area of the retained parcel, the severed parcel would have 67 metres of frontage. This frontage was confirmed by an Ontario Land Surveyor. The Official Plan does not specify a minimum lot frontage for residential lots in settlement areas. However, the UR1 zone requires a minimum of 76 metres of frontage. It is the opinion of Planning staff that a reduced frontage of 67 metres is acceptable given that there are opportunities for a safe entrance to the severed parcel (per Public Services review), and that the frontage would exceed the existing frontages of most lots in the immediate area. The retained parcel would be 0.6 hectares in size. The retained parcel would be less than the 0.8 hectares required by the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. The retained parcel would have 73 metres of frontage according to the Ontario Land Surveyor. The Township Official Plan requires a minimum 0.8 hectare lot area to ensure adequate separation distances between wells and sewage systems so that groundwater quality is not impacted, to avoid an overdeveloped appearance, and to help ensure a reasonable separation between residential uses. Section 5.6.1 of the Township Official Plan suggests that the minimum lot area could be changed subject to the approval of Council. This approval would come in the form of a zoning by-law amendment to permit the retained parcel to have a lesser lot area. Staff note that Council has spoken favourably of similar proposals that support infill development in settlement areas. The subject property is in a low-density residential area, with lot areas ranging from 0.4 hectares to 7.5 hectares. The average area is 1.6 hectares (0.6 hectares when the largest lots are excluded from the calculation). There are no further opportunities for lot creation in the immediate area because all other useable frontage has already been divided. The www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 73 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District

severed parcel would be twice the required size. The retained parcel is already developed so any potential impact to groundwater quality and quantity is anticipated to be the same regardless of whether the parcel is 0.8 hectares or 0.6 hectares. Private wells and sewage systems are the only servicing option in Battersea. The Township must be satisfied that any new lot created by consent can be serviced by a sewage disposal facility and adequate water supply. Building Services was satisfied that the severed parcel has flexibility to locate a sewage disposal system. The Township typically requires the ability for a parcel to be serviced by a private well as a condition of consent approval. The retained parcel would contain the existing dwelling, well, and sewage system.

Conclusion It is the opinion of staff that the proposed zoning by-law amendment is consistent and conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement 2020, the County of Frontenac Official Plan, and the South Frontenac Official Plan, and represents good planning for the subject lands. Staff are recommending that Council pass a by-law during the Council meeting in which the public meeting is held, per Procedural By-law as Amended by By-law 2023-44, as the planning matter is technical in nature. Specifically, the Committee of Adjustment had consideration for all applicable policy in the decision to grant provisional approval to the consent applications, and the by-law will fulfill one of their conditions.

Financial Implications Not applicable.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report.

☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A

Page 74 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application PL-ZBA-2023-0092, Itterman, 2348 Sands Road, Storrington District

by mail to every owner of land within 120 metres of the subject lands by posting notice signs on the subject lands by e-mail to prescribed persons and public bodies

Attachments

By-law 2023-106

Approvals Report Prepared By: Christine Woods, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner Submitted By:

Brad Wright Director of Development Services Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 75 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2023-106 BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LAND FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL – FIRST DENSITY (UR1) TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL – FIRST DENSITY – SPECIAL PROVISION (UR1-25 AND UR1-26) ON LANDS DESCRIBED AS 2348 SANDS ROAD, PART OF LOT 8, CONCESSION 9, DISTRICT OF STORRINGTON WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990 as amended, the Council of a Municipality may enact by-laws regulating the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures thereon; AND WHEREAS By-law 2003-75 being the Zoning By-law regulates the use of land and the erection, location and use of buildings and structures within the Township of South Frontenac; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac considered all written and oral submissions received on this application, the effect of which helped Council make an informed decision; AND that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, hereby enacts as follows: 1.

THAT Schedule “H” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Urban Residential – First Density (UR1) to Urban Residential – First Density – Special Provision (UR1-25 and UR1-26) for the lands shown on Schedule “1”.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding new sections UR1-25 and UR1-26 (Part of Lot 8, Concession 9, District of Storrington) immediately after the last Urban Residential – First Density – Special Provision section to read as follows: UR1-25 (Part of Lot 8, Concession 9, District of Storrington) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14 or any other provision of this Bylaw to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Urban Residential – First Density (UR1-25), the following provisions apply: • •

Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Frontage (Minimum)

0.6 hectares (1.4 acres) 73 metres (239.5 ft)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. UR1-26 (Part of Lot 8, Concession 9, District of Storrington) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14 or any other provision of this Bylaw to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Urban Residential – First Density (UR1-26), the following provisions apply: •

Lot Frontage (Minimum)

67 metres (219.8 ft)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. 3.

THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by said Section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 19th day of December, 2023. Read a first and second time this 19th day of December, 2023.

Page 76 of 470 Read a third time and finally passed this 19th day of December, 2023. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 77 of 470 Schedule 1 This is Schedule “1” to By-law No. 2023-106

Passed this 19th day of December, 2023

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 78 of 470 Minutes of Council December, 12, 2023

Township of South Frontenac Council Meeting Minutes

Meeting # 35 Time: 9:00 a.m. Location: Council Chambers / virtual via Zoom Present: Charlene Godfrey, Ray Leonard, Doug Morey, Steve Pegrum (arrived at 9:06 a.m.), Norm Roberts, Randy Ruttan, Ron Sleeth (departed at 11:25 a.m.), Scott Trueman, Mayor Ron Vandewal Staff: Louise Fragnito - Chief Administrative Officer, James Thompson - Clerk, Michelle Hannah - Deputy Clerk, Brad Wright - Director of Development Services, Alex BennettActing Director of Fire and Emergency Services (arrived at 11:30 a.m.), Kyle Bolton Director of Public Services, Shelley Stedall - Director of Corporate Services and Treasurer, Troy Dunlop - Manager of Engineering & Capital Projects, Tim Laprade Recreation and Facilities Manager, Brian Kirk - Manager of Operations & Fleet, Jan Minaker - Manager of Human Resources, Stephanie Kuca - Deputy Treasurer. 1

Call to Order

Resolution Resolution No. 2023:35:01 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Trueman That the Council meeting of December 12, 2023, 2023 be called to order at 9:02 a.m. Carried

2 a)

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof There were none.

Approval of Agenda

Resolution Resolution No. 2023:35:02 Moved by Councillor Ruttan Seconded by Councillor Trueman That the agenda be approved, as presented.

4 a)

Scheduled Closed Session There was none.

Recess

Public Meeting

There was none.

Carried

Page 79 of 470 Minutes of Council December, 12, 2023 7 a) 8 a)

Delegations There were none. Briefings There were none.

Approval of Minutes

Resolution Resolution No. 2023:35:03 Moved by Councillor Godfrey Seconded by Councillor Morey That the minutes of the December 5, 2023 Council meeting be approved.

Reports Requiring Action

Township of South Frontenac - 2024 Draft Budget Deliberation

Carried

Shelley Stedall, Director of Corporate Services conducted a PowerPoint presentation regarding the 2024 Budget. During deliberations Council directed staff to remove $6,173.00 regarding the special levy for the 14 Island Lake Dam maintenance for Quinte Conservation from the budget. Council recessed from 10:14 a.m. - 10:24 a.m. 11 a)

Advisory Committee Reports or Minutes There were none.

Reports Requiring Approval of By-laws

Appointment of Treasurer Resolution No. 2023:35:04 Moved by Councillor Leonard Seconded by Councillor Roberts That By-law 2023-98 being a By-law to appoint Louise Fragnito as Treasurer be given first and second reading. Carried Resolution No. 2023:35:05 Moved by Councillor Morey Seconded by Councillor Ruttan That By-law 2023-98 be given third reading, signed and sealed.

13 a)

Reports for Information There were none.

Carried

Page 80 of 470 Minutes of Council December, 12, 2023 14 a) 15 a) 16 a) 17 a) 18 a) 19 a)

Committee of the Whole There was none. Information Items There were none. Notice of Motions There were none. Rise and Report regarding County Council and External Boards There were none. Announcements/Statements by Councillors There were none. Closed Session (if requested) There was none.

Confirmatory By-law

Resolution Resolution No. 2023:35:06 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Pegrum That By-law 2023-99, being a by-law to confirm generally all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac, be given first and second reading. Carried Resolution No. 2023:35:07 Moved by Councillor Morey Seconded by Councillor Godfrey That By-law 2023-99, being the confirmatory by-law, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

Adjournment

Resolution Resolution No. 2023:35:08 Moved by Councillor Trueman Seconded by Councillor Leonard That the Council meeting of December 12, 2023 be adjourned at 11:36 a.m. Carried

Page 81 of 470 Minutes of Council December, 12, 2023

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

James Thompson, Clerk

Page 82 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Public Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject:

Drinking Water Quality Management System: Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan

Summary The purpose of this report is to recommend that Township Council receive the Top Management Report for 2022 and re-endorse the Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System.

Recommendation That Council receive the Sydenham Drinking Water System Management Review Summary Report 2022, Management Review Meeting Minutes and Audit Report; and That Council re-endorse the Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System and authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the Owner and Top Management Endorsement of the Operational Plan for Sydenham’s Drinking Water Supply Systems document showing Council’s endorsement of the plan.

Background South Frontenac Township, as the Owner of the Sydenham Drinking Water System, is required by the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that these systems are operated by an Accredited Operating Authority, Utilities Kingston. In accordance with the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard, one component is the annual Management Review. This addresses the continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the Quality Management System. The Management Review was recently completed by the Operating Authority’s identified Top Management. The report and meeting minutes are required to be provided to the Owner (Council), and as a best management practice it is recommended that the Owner re-endorse the Operational Plan and their commitment to the Quality Management System.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 83 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Drinking Water Quality Management System: Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan

Background on Drinking Water Quality Management Standard The Drinking Water Quality Management Standard (DWQMS) approved under section 21 of the Safe Drinking Water Act was developed in partnership between the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) and Ontario’s water sector, after Justice Dennis O’Connor’s, Report of the Walkerton Inquiry 2002 recommended the adoption of quality management for municipal drinking water systems. The DWQMS complements the legislative and regulatory framework by endorsing a proactive and preventive approach to assuring drinking water quality. This approach includes consideration of elements that are fundamental to ensuring the long-term sustainability of a Drinking Water System including management processes employed within the system, the maintenance of infrastructure used to supply drinking water, and identification of potential risks and risk mitigation strategies for items such as system security, water treatment, and the impacts of climate change. The DWQMS is based on a “plan, do, check, and improve” methodology which is similar to that found in some international standards. “Plan” requirements of the standard typically specify policies and procedures that must be documented in the operational plans for the drinking water system. “Do” requirements specify the policies and procedures that must be implemented. “Check” and “Improve” requirements of the standard are reflected in requirements to conduct internal audits and management reviews. The MECP has developed a pocket guide that examines the requirements of the DWQMS, providing high level overview of what each of the requirements means in the context of a municipal residential drinking water system. Most applicable to the recommendations in this report, the SDWA requires Owners and Operating Authorities of Municipal Residential Drinking Water Systems to have an accredited Operating Authority (Utilities Kingston). In order to become accredited, an Operating Authority must establish and maintain a Quality Management System (QMS). Minimum requirements for the QMS are specified in the Standard, the DWQMS. Utilities Kingston has appointed a Quality Management Representative and Alternate Representative to administer the QMS by ensuring that processes and procedures needed for the system are established and maintained. Additionally, the QMS Representative reports to Top Management and the Owner on the performance of the QMS including any need for improvement, ensures that personnel are aware of all applicable legislative and regulatory requirements that pertain to their duties for the operation of the system, and promotes awareness of the QMS throughout the Operating Authority. The Owner must in writing endorse the Operational Plan and receive relevant aspects of the QMS including the adequacy of infrastructure necessary to operate and maintain the

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 84 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Drinking Water Quality Management System: Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan

system, summary of maintenance, rehabilitation, renewal programs, and sampling results. These are all included in the Management Report, provided as Attachment A to this report.

Discussion/Analysis Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan Utilities Kingston, as the Operating Authority for the Sydenham Drinking Water Systems, is responsible for the implementation and ongoing maintenance of a Quality Management System (QMS) which meets the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard (DWQMS). The accreditation of operating authorities is based on the successful implementation of a QMS. In accordance with the DWQMS, one component is the annual Management Review, which addresses the continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the QMS, including the results of the annual accreditation audit. This Management Review was recently completed by the Operating Authority’s identified Top Management. The Top Management Summary report, meeting minutes and the annual accreditation report are contained in Attachments A, B and C, respectively, to this report, and are required to be provided to the Owner. No regulatory non-compliances, non-conformances or deficiencies were identified in the Management Review Summary report for the Sydenham Drinking Water System. The DWQMS requires that an Operational Plan be maintained by the Operating Authority, endorsed by the Owner, and accepted by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks. The Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water Systems was last approved by Top Management and Endorsed by the System Owner in 2022. There were no changes made to the Operational Plan in 2022. The Operational Plan is available on the Townships website and is also linked to Utilities Kingston’s website and attached as Attachment F to this report. It is recommended that the Owner re-endorse the Operational Plan and their commitment to the QMS.

Financial Implications Not applicable to this report.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable):

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 85 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Drinking Water Quality Management System: Management Review Report and Endorsement of Operational Plan

Notice/Consultation •

Utilities Kingston

Attachments Attachment A – Sydenham Management Review Summary Report 2022 Attachment B – Sydenham DWQMS Management Review Meeting Minutes Attachment C – Sydenham DWS Systems Audit Report Attachment D – W-P-01 Sydenham QMS Policy Attachment E – W-P-02 Sydenham QMS Owner and Top Management Commitment and Endorsement (intentionally left blank for re-endorsement) Attachment F – W-OP-01 Sydenham Operational Plan v.8.0

Approvals Submitted By:

Reviewed By:

W. Troy Dunlop, C.E.T. Manager of Engineering and Capital Projects

Kyle Bolton, C.E.T. Director of Public Services

Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Sydenham Management Review Summary Report

Page 86 of 470

Sydenham Management Review Summary Report 2022 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the system owner to provide a summary of information reviewed by Top Management to evaluate the continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the Quality Management System (QMS) for the Sydenham Drinking Water System as required by the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard (DWQMS).

INCIDENTS OF REGULATORY NON-COMPLIANCE There were no incidents of regulatory non-compliance.

INCIDENTS OF ADVERSE DRINKING WATER TESTS In total, 566 treated water and distribution system samples were collected for testing by an accredited laboratory. One sample collected resulted in a notification of an indicator of adverse water quality. Notifications of Adverse Water Quality represent 0.18% of the total samples collected.

DEVIATIONS FROM CRITICAL CONTROL POINT LIMITS AND RESPONSE ACTIONS There were three reported deviations from the critical control limits. Responses for these incidents were pursued appropriately and effectively through process adjustments or through flushing to restore the combined chlorine residual to above 1.00mg/l.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS The risk assessments outcomes for the Sydenham System were reviewed in Q4 and included potential hazardous events and associated hazards listed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). The risk assessment outcomes are available on SharePoint. These risk assessments and associated outcomes have been identified as effective due to their ability to reduce risk, and consistently provide safe and reliable water services to our customers and community. The risk assessment outcomes are available on SharePoint. There were no new risks identified in this reporting period.

INTERNAL AND THIRD-PARTY AUDIT RESULTS Internal Audit Internal Audits were completed and covered all 21 elements of the DWQMS. No major or minornonconformance were identified. External Audit QMS documents and records were provided to SAI Global for the External System Audit. The external audit resulted in no non-conformances. A copy of the audit report has been attached to this report as an appendix.

Page 1

Page 87 of 470

RESULTS OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE TESTING Emer gency Response Testing Tabletop scenarios for each of the identified Emergency Response and Recovery Procedures were planned as part of this year’s emergency response training and testing. Staff worked through scenarios with their supervisor to identify deficiencies and potential improvements to the Emergency Response and Recovery Procedure and other procedures and processes applicable to emergency situations. I d e n t i f i e d Po s s i b l e I m p r ove m e n t s Annual emergency response training and testing involving the evaluation of emergency scenarios and identification of appropriate response actions and necessary reporting has demonstrated to be a very valuable element of the DWQMS. Operators continue to immediately demonstrate and identify all appropriate response actions and necessary reporting requirements during the tabletop scenario. Operators also recognize the importance of sharing and communicating information between Treatment Operations, System Operations, and Engineering Services. Communication and working together as a team before and after an event further improve the assessment of potential emergency events and the response actions taken. The following action items were identified during this year’s training exercise. • • • • • • • •

Confirm Spill Kit is on truck 51. o Follow up - Completed. Confirm Spill Kits are in barrels outside of Bay. o Follow up - Completed. Inform all staff of capacity of Spill Kits o Follow up - Completed. Investigate Catch basin Spill Kit possibilities. o Follow up - Completed. Equip all trucks with appropriately sized spill kits. o Follow up - Completed. Follow-up on the following question from Sam Bowden “Would it be beneficial to redirect the dewatering pump to somewhere other than where it was originally? To a manhole possibly?” o Follow up - Completed. Communicate to staff Outstanding Adverse Water Quality Notification o Follow up - Completed. Discuss with Operations if there is a need for a checklist of people to notify in an emergency. If so, who maintains this list? o Follow up - Completed.

S TAT U S O F P O S S I B L E I M P ROV E M E N T S F RO M P R E V I O U S T E S T I N G No improvements were identified from the emergency response testing.

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE The Sydenham water treatment plant operated by Utilities Kingston continued to perform well. Process inputs also remained relatively stable during the reporting year. Current and routine maintenance, rehabilitation, and renewal programs continue to be a priority. Distribution system performance is typically measured by its ability to provide safe drinking water at adequate pressure and volume, and its efficiency in delivering that water with minimal loss. Aspects of distribution system performance, such as lost water, can have a major impact on the performance of treatment, pumping, and storage facilities.

Page 2

Page 88 of 470 System Inspection Rating Sydenham Drinking Water System (DWS) – 100% Percentage Of Microbiological (Total Coliform & E. Coli) Test Results Meeting Ontario’s Drinking Water Quality Standards Sydenham DWS – 99.7%* *Any samples taken within the rating period that results in an indicator of adverse water quality will affect the rating. Percentage Of Chemical & Radiological Test Results Meeting Ontario’s Drinking Water Quality Standards Sydenham DWS 100%

RAW WATER SUPPLY AND DRINKING WATER QUALITY TRENDS Raw water chemistry is continuously monitored as it can change quickly because of Sydenham Lake’s composition of granite to the north and limestone to the south. Growths of blue green algal blooms are increasing in Ontario’s lakes and rivers. This is generating concern for changes in risk to the raw water supply and the potential of associated human health dangers caused by cyanobacteria that can be present in toxic blooms. Weekly testing of intake and treated water is being tested for Microcystin, the harmful toxin found in Blue-green algal blooms. Additional blue green algal refresher training is also by operators in advance of the typical June to October growing season.

FOLLOW-UP ON ACTION ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT REVIEWS The following action items were identified during the previous management review: • Determine who at South Frontenac can provide water loss information. o Pending. • Establish a formalized system for South Frontenac to forward customer complaints to Utilities Kingston. o Completed. • Revise W-P-05 Sydenham QMS Owner and Top Management Commitment and Endorsement to reflect recent changes to Top Management. o Completed.

THE STATUS OF MANAGEMENT ACTION ITEMS IDENTIFIED BETWEEN REVIEWS There have been no action items identified since the last Management Review.

CHANGES THAT COULD AFFECT THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM There have been no changes to the MECP DWQMS 2.0. Our strong documentation and reporting system allow us to evaluate the effectiveness and operational performance of the DWS as required by the standard. Our QMS also incorporates proactive and reactive approaches to ensure continual improvement of the system, ensuring that the QMS is not limited to fixing things as they fail. Although the Standard does not continually change, it does require continuous ongoing changes and monitoring of the system that include but not limited to documents, work process, organizational changes, initiatives, strategies, and information. Page 3

Page 89 of 470

CONSUMER FEEDBACK Water Quality Assurance Operators reported no water quality complaints or concerns.

THE RESOURCES NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM There were no identified deficiencies during the management review. It was decided that current programs and resources are continued, no additional action items are required. Top Management has made the necessary resources available to maintain and continually improve the QMS. To ensure the requirement continues to be met, it is recommended that current dedicated resources (QMS Representative and Alternate) be maintained, and that Top Management continues to make additional personnel available as requested for QMS activities such as risk assessments, maintenance and infrastructure reviews, document development, revision and review, training, and other activities identified as necessary to maintain and improve the QMS.

THE RESULTS OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW The annual Review and Provision of Infrastructure was completed by the Director of Water / Wastewater in the last quarter of the reporting Calendar year. The review confirmed that relevant and applicable information is regularly reviewed by personnel to evaluate the condition and capacity of the DWS and its components. No recommendations were identified by the Review and Provision of Infrastructure review.

MULTI-YEAR INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM

Existing infrastructure is reviewed based on criteria such as age, material, available condition assessments, and main break history. From this review a priority list was compiled. Then, with consideration for each element’s needs, level of priority, and the available budget, a master list of projects was developed, defining the infrastructure renewal plan. The following capital projects were completed in: •

Pneumatic Actuated Valve Replacement.

•

Redundant Air Compressor and Parallel Air Supply System.

OPERATIONAL PLAN CURRENCY, CONTENT AND UPDATES The Operational Plan for the Sydenham Water System was last approved by Top Management and Endorsed by the System Owner in 2021. There were no changes made to the Operational Plan.

STAFF SUGGESTIONS Suggestions received from individual personnel concerning the QMS have been focused on and resulted in improvements to the processes and forms used to record operational information and improvements to how information is accessed through SharePoint. Staff have made considerable suggestions to continue to further improve ease of use to SharePoint from mobile devices. Staff also provide suggestions for improvements through their participation in annual QMS Review Training and Emergency Response and Recovery Training and Testing. The majority of staff suggestions are made verbally to either Supervisors or Quality Management Coordinators. Staff suggestions that require a change to a document or form are recorded using the Document Change Request form with OFI, BMP, Corrective Action Request, and Preventative Action Request forms available as a formalized processes to capture other staff suggestions. Additionally, a Water Staff Suggestions List is available to encourage suggestions and feedback related to the day to day operations. The Water Staff Suggestions list received no entries this reporting year but continues to be made available to staff as a formal way to make suggestions. Page 4

Page 90 of 470

IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES, DECISIONS, AND ACTION ITEMS There were no identified deficiencies during the management review. It was decided that all other programs and resources are continued.

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Best Management Practices (BMI) and Opportunities for Improvement (OFI). BMP & OFI items are documented using the DWQMS Best Management Practices List on SharePoint. Implemented BMPs and OFIs are identified for items that assist the owner and operating authority of the DWS in the delivery of safe, high quality drinking water and in providing mechanisms to optimize efficiencies within the DWS and/or QMS and provide information to assist in future planning for the systems. The following Best Management Practices and follow up details are provided below: • Gather documentation on a maintenance and asset management program for Systems and determine what resources are necessary to drive it. o Completed. • Attended OWWA Water Conference where we attended breakout sessions, networked with peer and industry experts. o Completed. • Created a “Planned Work Assessment and Contingency Plan” form. This form is available to staff on SharePoint as a tool to document and communicate planned work. This is not a required form but is provided as an additional tool to assist in organizing and communicating planned work that potentially could affect other groups. o Completed. • Participated in the OMWA webinar - The Great Resignation and the Challenge of Hiring and Retaining Staff o Completed. • Completed Best Management Participated in Applied Learning from Operations during COVID-19 put on by Ontario Municipal Water Association. o Completed. Opportunity for Improvement and follow up details are provided below: •

•

Update the Competencies, Certification, and Training table in W-L-13 Kingston and Cana Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities and Competency to require the SubForeperson – System Operations to have a Class IV Water Distribution Certificate. o Updated the job titles to match the new position titles. Add clarification to the table in W-L-05 Operator Training Table that Operator Responsibility Training is defined in W- L-13s Sydenham Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities and Competency. o Completed. Update W-E-03 Boil Water Advisory Notification to add the person responsible for Utilities Kingston communications with additional communication methods updated to reflect modern technology. o Completed.

Page 5

Page 91 of 470

DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MINUTES OF THE 2023 MANAGEMENT REVIEW MEETING FOR THE SYDENHAM DRINKING WATER SYSTEMS October 30, 2023 Start Time: 1430hrs In Attendance: David Fell, Remi Adedapo, Heather Roberts, Julie Runions, Chris Leeman, Kurt Clark, Carl Dooher, Philip Emon, James Patenaude, Adam Long Raw Water Supply and Drinking Water Quality Trends DF asked why there were zero flow tests performed since 2019. CD explained that for Sydenham, we are not required to do flow testing annually, but every 5 years. DF asked if it is more efficient to do them all in one year, or to spread them across the 5 years. CD answered yes, System Operators inspect all hydrants every year, but only do flow tests every 5 years as it is more efficient. The Results of The Infrastructure Review RA: Are the recommended works in the table labelled “Recommended Works and Implementation Status to 2029” in the budget? HR answered, yes. Identified Deficiencies, Decisions, and Action Items from this Management Review Identified Action Items from This Management Review Action Item

Responsible Person

Follow Up

There were no actions identified during this Management Review Meeting

N/A

End Time: 1500hrs

Page 92 of 470 Audit Report

Audit Report Re Accreditation Audit for 1425445 Ontario Limited (Operating as Utilities Kingston) 1670083-03 Audited Address: 4410 Point Road, Sydenham, Ontario, CAN, K0H 2T0 Start and End Date: June 21, 2022 Type of audit:

Verification Audit

Issue Date: Revision Level:

June 22, 2022 Final

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 1

Page 93 of 470 Audit Report

BACKGROUND INFORMATION SAI Global conducted an audit of 1425445 Ontario Limited (Operating as Utilities Kingston) beginning and ending on June 21, 2022 to DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT STANDARD VERSION 2 - 2017. The purpose of this audit report is to summarise the degree of compliance with relevant criteria, as defined on the cover page of this report, based on the evidence obtained during the audit of your organization. This audit report considers your organization’s policies, objectives, and continual improvement processes. Comments may include how suitable the objectives selected by your organization appear to be in regard to maintaining customer satisfaction levels and providing other benefits with respect to policy and other external and internal needs. We may also comment regarding the measurable progress you have made in reaching these targets for improvement. SAI Global audits are carried out within the requirements of SAI Global procedures that also reflect the requirements and guidance provided in the international standards relating to audit practice such as ISO/IEC 17021-1, ISO 19011 and other normative criteria. SAI Global Auditors are assigned to audits according to industry, standard or technical competencies appropriate to the organization being audited. Details of such experience and competency are maintained in our records. In addition to the information contained in this audit report, SAI Global maintains files for each client. These files contain details of organization size and personnel as well as evidence collected during preliminary and subsequent audit activities (Documentation Review and Scope) relevant to the application for initial and continuing certification of your organization. Please take care to advise us of any change that may affect the application/certification or may assist us to keep your contact information up to date, as required by SAI Global Terms and Conditions. This report has been prepared by SAI Global Limited (SAI Global) in respect of a Client’s application for assessment by SAI Global. The purpose of the report is to comment upon evidence of the Client’s compliance with the standards or other criteria specified. The content of this report applies only to matters, which were evident to SAI Global at the time of the audit, based on sampling of evidence provided and within the audit scope. SAI Global does not warrant or otherwise comment upon the suitability of the contents of the report or the certificate for any particular purpose or use. SAI Global accepts no liability whatsoever for consequences to, or actions taken by, third parties as a result of or in reliance upon information contained in this report or certificate. Please note that this report is subject to independent review and approval. Should changes to the outcomes of this report be necessary as a result of the review, a revised report will be issued and will supersede this report.

Standard:

DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT STANDARD VERSION 2 - 2017

Scope of Certification:

Drinking Water

Drinking Water System Owner:

The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac

Operating Authority:

1425445 Ontario Ltd. (Operating as Utilities Kingston)

Population Services:

940

Activities:

Treatment and Distribution

Drinking Water Systems

Sydenham Drinking Water System Licence #166-101, issue 3

Total audit duration:

Person(s): 1

Day(s): 0.75

Audit Team Member(s):

Team Leader

Sandra Tavares

Other Participants:

Refer to Audit Summary below and associated Meeting Attendees

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 2

Page 94 of 470 Audit Report

Definitions and action required with respect to audit findings

Major Non-conformance: Based on objective evidence, the absence of, or a significant failure to implement and/or maintain conformance to requirements of the applicable standard. Such issues may raise significant doubt as to the capability of the management system to achieve its intended outputs (i.e. the absence of or failure to implement a complete Management System clause of the standard); or A situation which would on the basis of available objective evidence, raise significant doubt as to the capability of the Management System to achieve the stated policy and objectives of the customer. NOTE: The “applicable Standard” is the Standard which SAI Global are issuing certification against, and may be a Product Standard, a management system Standard, a food safety Standard or another set of documented criteria. Action required: This category of findings requires SAI Global to issue a formal NCR; to receive and approve client’s proposed correction and corrective action plans; and formally verify the effective implementation of planned activities. Correction and corrective action plan should be submitted to SAI Global prior to commencement of follow-up activities as required. Follow-up action by SAI Global must ‘close out’ the NCR or reduce it to a lesser category within 90 days for initial certification and within 60 days for surveillance or recertification audits, from the last day of the audit. If significant risk issues (e.g. safety, environmental, food safety, product legality/quality, etc.) are detected during an audit these shall be reported immediately to the Client and more immediate or instant correction shall be requested. If this is not agreed and cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of SAI Global, immediate suspension shall be recommended. In the case of initial certification, failure to close out NCR within the time limits means that the Certification Audit may be repeated. If significant risk issues (e.g. safety, environmental, food safety, product legality/quality, etc.) are detected during an audit these shall be reported immediately to the Client and more immediate or instant correction shall be requested. If this is not agreed and cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of SAI Global, immediate suspension shall be recommended. In the case of an already certified client, failure to close out NCR within the time limits means that suspension proceedings may be instituted by SAI Global. Follow-up activities incur additional charges.

Minor Non-conformance: Represents either a management system weakness or minor issue that could lead to a major nonconformance if not addressed. Each minor NC should be considered for potential improvement and to further investigate any system weaknesses for possible inclusion in the corrective action program Action required: This category of findings requires SAI Global to issue a formal NCR; to receive and approve client’s proposed correction and corrective action plans; and formally verify the effective implementation of planned activities at the next scheduled audit.

Opportunity for Improvement: A documented statement, which may identify areas for improvement however shall not make specific recommendation(s). Action required: Client may develop and implement solutions in order to add value to operations and management systems. SAI Global is not required to follow-up on this category of audit finding.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 3

Page 95 of 470 Audit Report

Audit Type and Purpose On-site Verification Audit: An onsite audit to assess whether a QMS has been implemented for the subject system that meets the “DO” requirements of the DWQMS V2. Audit Objectives The objective of the audit was to determine whether the drinking water Quality Management System (QMS) of the subject system conforms to the requirements of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Drinking Water Quality Management Standard (DWQMS V2). The audit was also intended to gather the information necessary for SAI Global to assess whether accreditation can continue or be offered or to the Operating Authority. Audit Scope The facilities and processes associated with the operating authority’s QMS were objectively evaluated to obtain audit evidence and to determine a) whether the quality management activities and related results conform with DWQMS V2 requirements, and b) if they have been effectively implemented and/or maintained. Audit Criteria: •

The Drinking Water Quality Management Standard Version 2

•

Current QMS manuals, procedures and records implemented by the Operating Authority

•

SAI Global Accreditation Program Handbook

Confidentiality and Documentation Requirements The SAI Global stores their records and reports to ensure their preservation and confidentiality. Unless required by law, the SAI Global will not disclose audit records to a third party without prior written consent of the applicant. The only exception will be that the SAI Global will provide audit and corrective action reports to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. For more information, please refer to the SAI Global Accreditation Program Handbook. As part of the SAI Global Terms, it is necessary for you to notify SAI Global of any changes to your Quality Management System that you believe are significant enough to risk non-conformity with DWQMS V2: For more information, please refer to the SAI Global Accreditation Program Handbook. Review of any changes Changes to the Operating Authority since last audit include:

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

refer to Element 9

Page 4

Page 96 of 470 Audit Report

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Based on the results of this onsite verification audit (Stage 2) and the results of the System audit (Stage 1) it has been determined that the management system is effectively implemented and meets the requirements of the standard relative to the scope of certification identified in this report; therefore, a recommendation for certification will be submitted to SAI Global review team. Recommendation Based on the results of this audit it has been determined that the management system is effectively implemented and maintained and meets the requirements of the standard relative to the scope of certification identified in this report; therefore, a recommendation for (continued) certification will be submitted to SAI Global review team.

Opportunities for Improvement: The following opportunities for improvement have been identified. •

Element 2 QMS Policy – There is an opportunity to post the QMS Policy (and associated Operational Plan) on the South Frontenac website.

•

Element 5 Document and Records Control – There is an opportunity to: i) ensure document control (e.g., Water Treatment Plant Chemistry sheet). ii) include external maintenance records (e.g., Tower Inspection, Generator and Calibration reports) and their specific locations within the W-L-04 Records Table. • Element 13 Essential Supplies and Services – There is an opportunity to retain evidence of essential services quality (e.g., calibration services). • Element 18 Emergency Management – There is an opportunity to create an emergency testing planning matrix to ensure all emergency situations identified (e.g., W-E-05 Spill Response as a result of identified seasonal recreational traffic risk, W-E-03 Boil Water Advisory, and W-E-02 Adverse Water Quality, W-E-04 Drinking Water Contamination Investigation and Response) are tested within a 3-year period (coinciding with the DWQMS ReAccreditation cycle) to ensure preparedness. • Element 21 Continual Improvement – There is an opportunity to: i) consistently identify root cause (e.g., 2020 internal audit 201027-201225-16-1) and review of effectiveness (21115-211129-12-1 from 2021 internal audit), complete with verification comments. ii) review Best Management Practice ‘Objective Evidence’, ‘Response’ and ‘Effectiveness’ SharePoint fields for applicability and completion. It is suggested that the opportunities for improvement be considered by management to further enhance the Operating Authority’s Quality Management System and performance. Management System Documentation The management systems operational plan(s) was reviewed and found to be in conformance with the requirements of the standard. Management Review Records of the most recent management review meetings were verified and found to meet the requirements of the standard. All inputs were reflected in the records and appear suitably managed as reflected by resulting actions and decisions.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 5

Page 97 of 470 Audit Report

Internal Audits Internal audits are being conducted at planned intervals to ensure conformance to planned arrangements, the requirements of the standard and the established management system. Corrective, Preventive Action & Continual Improvement Processes The Operating Authority is implementing an effective process for the continual improvement of the management system through the use of the quality policy, quality objectives, audit results, data analysis, the appropriate management of corrective and preventive actions and management review.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 6

Page 98 of 470 Audit Report

Summary of Findings

Quality Management System

Conforms

Quality Management System Policy

OFI

Commitment and Endorsement

Conforms

Quality Management System Representative

Conforms

Document and Records Control

OFI

Drinking-Water System

Conforms

Risk Assessment

Conforms

Risk Assessment Outcomes

Conforms

Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities and Authorities

Conforms

Competencies

Conforms

Personnel Coverage

Conforms

Communications

Conforms

Essential Supplies and Services

OFI

Review and Provision of Infrastructure

Conforms

Infrastructure Maintenance, Rehabilitation & Renewal

Conforms

Sampling, Testing and Monitoring

Conforms

Measurement & Recording Equipment Calibration and Maintenance

Conforms

Emergency Management

OFI

Internal Audits

Conforms

Management Review

Conforms

Continual Improvement

OFI

Major NCR #

Major non-conformity. The auditor has determined one of the following: (a) a required element of the DWQMS has not been incorporated into a QMS; (b) a systemic problem with a QMS is evidenced by two or more minor non-conformities; or (c) a minor non-conformity identified with a corrective action request has not been remedied.

Minor NCR #

Minor non-conformity. In the opinion of the auditor, part of a required element of the DWQMS has not been incorporated satisfactorily into a QMS.

OFI

Opportunity for improvement. Conforms to requirement, but there is an opportunity for improvement.

Conforms

Conforms to requirement.

NANC

Not applicable/Not Covered during this audit.

Additional comment added by auditor in the body of the report.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 7

Page 99 of 470 Audit Report

PART D.

Audit Observations, Findings and Comments

DWQMS Reference:

1 Quality Management System

Client Reference:

Sydenham Drinking Water System (DWS) Operational Plan (OP) W-OP-03 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) The Operating Authority (OA, Utilities Kingston) has established and maintains the Quality Management System (QMS) in accordance with the DWQMS requirements and the policies and procedures documented in the Operational Plan (OP) available at https://utilitieskingston.com/Water/Quality/Management (viewing at the Utilities Kingston Service Centre at 85 Lappan’s Lane could not be confirmed due to time constraints). Refer to Element 2 OFI.

DWQMS Reference:

2 Quality Management System Policy

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 2 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), referenced W-P-04 QMS Policy for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has established and maintains a QMS that is consistent with its QMS Policy via: a) commitment to maintenance and continual improvement as per Elements 15 and 21 below, b) commitment to the Consumer to provide safe drinking water as per Element 16, c) commitment to comply with applicable legislation and regulations as per Element 3 directly below, and d) is in a form that can be communicated to all OA personnel, the Owner, and the Public via the OP as per Element 1 directly above – refer to OFI.

DWQMS Reference:

3 Commitment and Endorsement

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 3 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-P-05 Owner and Top Management Endorsement of the Operational Plan for the Sydenham DWS (rev. 8-Nov-2021)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Top Management (represented by the President & Chief Executive Officer [CEO], Chief Operating Officer [COO], Director Water & Wastewater Operations, and Managers of Water & Wastewater Treatment and System Operations) have provided evidence of commitment to an effective QMS by: a) ensuring that a QMS is in place that meets the DWQMS requirements as per Element 1 above, ensuring the OA is aware of all applicable legislative and regulatory requirements (e.g., formalising existing microcystin through license and quarterly HaloAcetic Acid [HAA] sampling and testing, MECP Watermain Disinfection Procedure and MECP cybersecurity risk [Asset Risk Assessment Report for SCADA dated 9-Feb-2021] and their identification via training, MECP emails and interaction and impact on the QMS was discussed with Manager of System Operations, QMS Representative and Alternate), b) communicating the QMS according to the procedure for communications as per Element 12, c) determining, obtaining, or providing the resources needed to maintain and continually Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 8

Page 100 of 470 Audit Report

improve the QMS as per Element 20. DWQMS Reference:

4 Quality Management System Representative

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 4 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-P-06 QMS Representative for the Sydenham DWS Acknowledgement of Responsibilities (rev.26-Jan-2022)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Top Management has appointed and authorized via W-OP-06 dated 28-Apr-2022, a QMS Representative and alternate who, irrespective of other responsibilities: • administer the QMS by ensuring that processes and procedures are established and maintained, and that current versions of documents required are being used at all times, as per Element 5. • report to Top Management on the QMS performance and any need for improvement as per Element 20, • ensure that personnel are aware of all applicable legislative and regulatory requirements that pertain to their duties for the operation of the Subject System as per Element 3 directly above, and • promote QMS awareness throughout the OA as per Elements 10 and 12. DWQMS Reference:

5 Document and Record Control

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 5 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-01 Document Control (rev.28-Apr-2020) and W-G-02 Records Control (rev.29-Apr-2020), W-L-01 Document and W-L-04 Records Control Tables (rev.18-Dec-2018)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to W-G-01 and -02 and W-L-01 and -04 for document and records control and has ensured the QMS documentation for the Subject System includes, as referenced throughout this summary: a) the OP and its associated policies and procedures, b) documents and records determined by the OA as being needed to ensure the effective planning, operation, and control of its operations, and c) the results of internal and external audits and Management Reviews as per Elements 19 and 20 below, respectively. W-G-01 Distribution and revision of procedures to ensure currency, along with W-G-02 record accuracy, availability, and accessibility (e.g., cloud-based unet / SharePoint and server-based shared directories) was reviewed with Manager of Systems Operations and QMS Representative and alternate. W-L-04 Records Control Table hard (2019-2022 Rounds Sheets binders at 4410 Point Road, Sydenham Water Treatment Plant [WTP]) and soft (e.g., PeopleSoft) copy locations (Utilities Kingston 300 King St., Kingston) and their minimum retention time was also discussed and observed.

DWQMS Reference:

6 Drinking Water System

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 6 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has ensured the description of the Drinking Water System is kept current, confirmed through a tour of the Sydenham Class 2 (certificate posted dated 4-Oct-2017) WTP and Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 9

Page 101 of 470 Audit Report

SCADA for the elevated storage tank (level is function of batch facility). Raw water source, low lift and submersible pumps, pre-chlorination, 2 Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) tanks run in summer for colour and odour, 2 clearwells, backwashing/storage, primary and secondary disinfection, including alternating Ultra-Violet (UV) units, 3 pressure filters and high lift pumps (HLPs 1-3) and processes for dealing with temperature fluctuations were discussed. Ongoing monitoring of raw water quality and continual monitoring of the water treatment processes was observed.

DWQMS Reference

7 Risk Assessment

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 7 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-03 Risk Assessment (rev.14-Jun-2017)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston performs a risk assessment consistent with OP Section 7. The Risk Assessment Team and annual and 36-month process was confirmed with the Manager of Systems Operations and QMS Representative, including reliability and redundancy of equipment. As per ‘QMS Revisions Since Last Audit Completed in 2021’, an annual review was completed with a reassessment in 2019 (refer to Element 20 below).

DWQMS Reference:

8 Risk Assessment Outcomes

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 8 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-L-11s Sydenham Risk Assessment Outcomes Table

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 8. The identification of hazardous events associated with drinking water health hazards, and the assessment of the associated risks for the Sydenham Drinking Water System was last completed in 2019 with results in the Risk Assessment Outcomes Table. Deviations from Critical Control Limits (CCLs) are addressed in Element 20 with one instance of Filter Effluent Turbidity 24-Nov-2018 and the remainder Secondary Disinfection within the last 3 years. Forms can be completed electronically via SharePoint.

DWQMS Reference:

9 Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibility and Authorities

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 9 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), Sydenham DWQMS Organizational Structure W-L-13 (rev.24-Jan-2022)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston keeps current the description of the organizational structure including respective W-L-13 roles, responsibilities, and authorities, and communicates this information to OA personnel and the Owner as per Element 12 below. Management Review and Operator responsibilities were confirmed with the Manager of Systems Operations and QMS Representative and alternate. Manager of Systems Operations also confirmed involvement in risk assessment, maintenance and calibration processes.

DWQMS Reference:

10 Competencies

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 10 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), Sydenham DWQMS Organizational Structure, W-L-13s (rev.24-Jan-2022), W-G-04 Operator Training (rev.11-Dec-2012)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston undertakes activities to meet and maintain competencies for personnel directly Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 10

Page 102 of 470 Audit Report

affecting drinking water quality, and ensure that personnel are aware of the relevance of their duties and how they affect safe drinking water as per W-G-04, and maintains records of these activities (e.g., PeopleSoft which tracks frequencies such as the 3-year Director-approved MECP Mandatory Operator training; [at least annual] report observed sent to Manager of Systems Operations from Clerk with access by both) associated with Operator certification (observed in binder at Sydenham WTP), e.g.: • J. Andersen Class 4 Treatment 88243 exp.31-Jul-2024 • T. Arthur Classes 3 Treatment 108108 and 2 Distribution 113504 exp. 31-Dec- and 30Apr-2024 respectively • B. Curran Class 2 Treatment 88700 and Distribution 98731 exp.29-Feb- and 31-Mar-2024 • P. Emon (Manager of Systems Operations and Overall Responsible Operator [ORO]) Class 4 Treatment 10961 and Distribution 18484 exp. 31-Oct/Dec-2024 respectively • E. Fargo Class 3 Treatment 104037 exp. 31-Jul-2024 • P. Frigault Class 4 Treatment 13934 exp. 31-Mar-2023 • D. Harris Class 2 Distribution 15482 exp.31-May-2025 DWQMS Reference:

11 Personnel Coverage

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 11 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-05 Personnel Coverage (rev.18-Mar-2020)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and appears to conform to OP Section 11 and W-G-05 to ensure sufficient personnel meeting identified competencies are available for duties that directly affect drinking water quality. Refer to Element 20 for Operator callouts which are documented in the logbook and if work completed, identified in the SharePoint Maintenance portal. The Systems Operations Manager reported an average of 30-40 callouts / year.

DWQMS Reference:

12 Communications

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 12 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-06 QMS Communications (rev.28-Jan-2019)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 12 and referenced W-G-06, where OA Top Management communicates with: • the Owner regarding drinking water system issues and the QMS through reports to the CAO and Council (refer to Element 20) on the QMS Policy through OP review and endorsement, and audit and Management Review results. • OA personnel as per Element 10 and annual review sign off as per the Systems Operations Manager, staff meetings and uNet / SharePoint, etc. • Suppliers as per Element 13. • Public through the Utilities Kingston web site as per Element 1. DWQMS Reference:

13 Essential Supplies and Services

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 13 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-L-06 Essential Supplies and Services List (26-April-2022)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 13 and W-L-06 where providers of Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 11

Page 103 of 470 Audit Report

essential supplies and services have been identified. 205L treatment chemical drums observed at the Sydenham WTP (e.g., ammonium sulphate, Kemira PAX-X, sodium hypochlorite) were NSF/60 identified and Caduceon CALA accreditation available for laboratory testing services (exp.22-Nov2022).

DWQMS Reference:

14 Review and Provision of Infrastructure

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 14 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-07S Sydenham DWS Review and Provision of Infrastructure (rev.9-Mar-2019)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 14 and W-G-07S and communicates the findings of the review to the Owner as per Element 20. Previously annual, now quarterly review of maintenance programs (e.g., 2/4, 5/6, 7/15, 9/2 and 11/16/2021 as per SharePoint; 8-Feb-2022 set agenda and minutes reviewed discussed cathodic protection and 3rd party dive crew to address issue to replace breaks) is incorporated into the annual Director communication of capital needs (presentation 14-Dec-2021 to Committee of the Whole) which is currently being compiled for 2024 and 2025 (previous 2019-2024 capital budget dated 26-Jan2018 was approved in 2018 and observed with a 2019-2029 forecast). As per the Systems Operations Manager, distribution monitoring hydrant for dead ends is in this year’s budget as a result of the risk assessment outcomes and funds available; similarly, a repeated water main break has resulted in replacement scheduling to reduce risk.

DWQMS Reference:

15 Infrastructure Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Renewal

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 15 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-08 Infrastructure Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Renewal (rev.20-May2020)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston: •

•

keeps the summary of the infrastructure maintenance, rehabilitation, and renewal programs current through SharePoint for recurring (work orders are generated) and unscheduled maintenance for the 1.5 years (currently entering assets, activities and their frequencies which is to be *complete by the end of 2022) which was reviewed with the Manager of Systems Operations:

*Generator (observed during the WTP tour) maintenance takes place every 6 months and completed by Tandet (on Essential Supplies and Services List) who provide invoices detailing work completed (refer to Element 5 OFI); Standby Engine and Genset Run Sheet 2022 was observed completed at WTP dated 5/23Jan, 7/17/24-Feb, 11-Mar, 29-Apr, 5/29(latter outage)-May as well as 1-Oct-, 2/18Nov- and 14-Dec-2021 (hardcopy records date back to 2007)
Monthly UV reference check based on hours was completed 13-May and due 13Nov
Collector app / ipad is used for flushing with raw data observed for hydrant inspections and valve inspection, and maintenance 2-Oct-2020 through 2021 (dashboard identifies % completion but could not be accessed during the audit with an IT ticket submitted)
*HLP internal annual preventive maintenance is documented in the logbook
An external *Tower inspection is completed every 5 years, lastly ROV through the capital process 13-Dec-2015 which led to an unforeseen budget item with funds available and another offline inspection in 2019 (records in K: drive) ensures that the long-term forecast is reviewed at least once every Calendar Year,

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 12

Page 104 of 470 Audit Report

communicates the programs to the Owner, and monitors the effectiveness of the maintenance program quarterly as per Element 14 directly above. DWQMS Reference:

16 Sampling, Testing and Monitoring

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 16 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-09 Sampling, Testing and Monitoring (rev.26-Oct-2020), W-E-02 Adverse Water Quality Notifications (rev.1-May-2020), W-L-09 Bacteriological (rev.15-Oct-2020) and W-L-10 Chemical Sampling Schedules (rev.16Oct-2020)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 16 and W-G-09, the latter confirmed via: • continuous monitoring observed at the WTP (e.g., Daily Records Sheet [rev.18-Aug-2021] for Jan-June 6-12 [WTP visits 7 and 9-12 June meeting a minimum of 2/week with SCADA monitoring from King St. location] capturing general, raw, UV, compressor, flows and analyser verification data; Daily Report 18-Jun-2020; May and June 2022 Chemistry related to Cl, monochloramine, Ammonia, Aluminum, turbidity, UV, raw and treated; Lab Bench Sheet [rev.18-Aug-2021] for February through April with January in different binder) • in house, microbiological (latter as per W-L-09, 18-May-2022 Caduceon results observed for raw and treated water and elevated tank; Bacteriological / Chemical and Daily Reports were observed in binders at the WTP dating back to 2018) and lead sampling and testing (W-L-10) entered into WaterTrax and located in a shared location at ‘5 Sydenham’ by year which is then summarised by the Quality Assurance Operator within the Annual and Summary Reports (2021 combined), reviewed by the Systems Operations Supervisor, and made available at https://www.southfrontenac.net/en/living-here/billinginformation.aspx?_mid_=102631. DWQMS Reference:

17 Measurement and Recording Equipment Calibration and Maintenance

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 17 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-10 Measurement and Recording Equipment Calibration and Maintenance (rev.24-Jun-2019)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Kingston Utilities has implemented and conforms to OP Section 17 through W-G-10. Critical calibration was observed to be conducted by a third party as per the Essential Supplies and Services List W-L-06: •

ClearTech (refer to Element 13 OFI) certificates were observed exp.4-Apr-2024 supporting equipment stickers observed at WTP (e.g., handheld colorimeter DR300 in lab and 3 Cl analysers) with reports located in ‘K:\Sydenham\Calibration Reports’ by year and backed up to server at Kingston Wig Municipal building • Franklin Empire stickers on equipment due 10/22 for FIT-2019 raw water flowmeter Refer to Element 16 directly above for verification activities.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 13

Page 105 of 470 Audit Report

DWQMS Reference:

18 Emergency Management

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 18 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-E-01 Emergency Response and Recovery, W-E-03 Boil Water Advisory Notification, and W-E-02 Adverse Water Quality Notification (all rev.1May-2020), W-E-04 Drinking Water Contamination Investigation and Response (rev.26-Sep-2019), W-E-05 Spill Response (rev.24-Nov-2015), W-E-06 Emergency Water Conservation and Supply (rev.8-Dec-2021), 2021 Emergency Training and Testing Details, W-CC-07, -08, -09 (rev.26-Nov-2014), -10 (rev.5-Jan-2018) CCL Responses, Internal W-L07 and External W-L-08 Contact List

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kinston has implemented and conforms to OP Section 18 through W-E-01. Annual emergency preparedness training was confirmed to be provided by the Systems Operations Manager an in-class exercise (refer to OFI) was last carried out 13-Dec-2021 to review the requirements needed to ensure continuous operation of the WTP pertaining to Westbrook 300mm CI transmission watermain break; the review involved different training groups (e.g., 2-4 sessions 15/17-Dec) which needed to identify regulations and response measures required to respond to this emergency event, including internal and external communications. Dec-2020 testing involved management and had no resulting actions. Testing also took place in 2019. All emergency testing records are in SharePoint. Weekly backup systems are also tested from a maintenance perspective as per the Systems Operations Manager.

DWQMS Reference:

19 Internal Audits

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 19 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-11 Internal Audit (rev.29-May-2020), W-G-13 Preventative and Corrective Action (rev.26-Feb-2019)

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston has implemented and conforms to W-G-11 and ensures that internal Audits are conducted at least once every Calendar Year, lastly 8-11-Nov-2021 conducted by a Team of Operators and Supervisors and done remotely resulting in a minor nonconformance relating to Element 12 and whose resolution was reviewed in SharePoint (refer to Element 21 OFI). SharePoint ‘Element Lists’ shows results associated with respective Element year after year as of 2019. Previous hardcopy internal audits are located at the downstairs 300 King St. location dating back to 2012 / 2013 when Utilities Kingston took over as OA. External audits are available electronically dating back to 2012 in SharePoint.

DWQMS Reference:

20 Management Review

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 20 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-12 Management Review (rev.1-May-2019), 2020 Management Review Summary Report, 23-Jul-2021 PowerPoint and Minutes

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston Top Management has implemented and conforms W-G-12 by: a) ensuring a Management Review is conducted at least once every Calendar Year, lastly 23-Jul2021, which included Top Management as identified in Element 3 above as well as Supervisors of Water & Wastewater Systems Operations and QMS Representative and alternate who discussed: No a) incidents of regulatory non-compliance in relation to MECP Inspections and b) incidents of adverse drinking water tests Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 14

Page 106 of 470 Audit Report

c) deviations from CCLs and response actions included 1 in 2021 as per 2021 Summary Report, 4 in 2020, 3 in 2019 and 10 in 2018 (resulting in autoflusher implementation and leading to reduced CCL deviation instances) d) the effectiveness of the risk assessment process pertains to the 2020 review with no changes identified and minutes in SharePoint with read access. e) internal and third-party Audit results involved trending over 3 years with 1 external N/C in 2019 (chlorine packet expired) as well as in 2020 and 2021 internal audits with mostly OFIs. f) results of emergency response testing g) operational performance focusing on inspection and DWS ratings pertaining to adverse at 100% since 2019 with 2021 not yet available h) raw water supply and drinking water quality trends addresses microcystin and associated testing i) follow-up on previous and j) the status of management action items identified between reviews pertain to non-revenue water k) changes that could affect the QMS involves WTP condition assessment and the revised drinking water license l) Consumer feedback identified 0 complaints over 3 years no additional m) resources needed to maintain the QMS n) the results of the infrastructure review compared maintenance (Operations) to Capital (Engineering focus) o) OP currency, content, and updates involved moving documents out of the OP to streamline process when making changes to risk assessment and organisation p) staff suggestions are ongoing, including changes to documents which is managed through the feedback list with automated emails to advise of changes b) considering the results and identifying deficiencies and actions items to address as per item a) above, c) providing a record of any decisions and action items including the personnel responsible and the proposed timelines for their implementation through SharePoint (used since 2013-2015 and adding more capability annually to rely less on paper) with previous records dating back to 2011 at ‘city.kingston.on.ca/ns/UK/water/water_QMS_Master/09_Management Review/Sydenham/2021-2020 Reporting Year’ d) reporting the results, the identified deficiencies, decisions and action items to the Owner, lastly 14-Dec-2021 (minutes forwarded via email to Director from QMS Representative 17-Nov) through Committee of the Whole (Minutes Item 7a).

DWQMS Reference:

21 Continual Improvement

Client Reference:

Sydenham DWS OP W-OP-03 Section 21 (V8.0, 5-Nov-2021), W-G-13 Preventative and Corrective Action (rev.26-Feb-2019),

Details: (personnel interviewed, procedures, activities and records observed) Utilities Kingston continually improves the QMS effectiveness by implementing and conforming to W-G-13. Nonconformities are managed through SharePoint (refer to OFI) as well as Best Management Practices whose list was reviewed including 17-May-2022 internally-generated entry relating to planned work assessment and contingency plan which has not yet been implemented; preventive actions are similarly managed (e.g., 25-Aug-2021 CT instrument verification 210825210825-17). Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 15

Page 107 of 470 Audit Report

Details regarding the personnel interviewed and objective evidence reviewed are maintained on file at SAI Global. This report was prepared by:

Sandra Tavares, B.Sc., M.Sc., EP(EMSLA), EP-Sustainability SAI Global Management Systems Auditor The audit report is distributed as follows: • SAI Global • Operating Authority • Owner • MECP

Notes Copies of this report distributed outside the organization must include all pages.

Doc ID: 8298 / Issue Date: Mar. 2018

Page 16

Page 108 of 470

Utlh-hes

‘“

DRINKING WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Kinston DOCUMENT:

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY FOR THE SYDENHAM DRINKING WATER SYSTEM

DOCUMENTN0:

w.P.o4

Utilities Kingston is a community based corporation dedicated to the responsible management of safe and reliable integrated services. Our mission is to manage, operate and maintain community infrastructure to deliver safe, reliable services and a personal customer experience, guided by our values of safety, integrity, innovation and reliability. Our vision is to advance the unique multi-utility model to bene?t our customers and build better communities. Utilities Kingston, acting as the Operating Authority forthe Sydenham Drinking Water System, owned by the Township of South Frontenac, is committed to providing a safe and reliable supply of drinking water to our customers. Through the development, implementation, maintenance, and continual improvement of a Quality Management System, the management and staff of Utilities Kingston will ensure the continued safety and security of the drinking water supply by meeting or exceeding the requirements of all relevant legislation and regulations, and the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard.

APPROVAL

DAVI FELLP St I" A D CEO, UTILITIESKIN STOI 2°22 REWSEUJANUARYZS1

Page 109 of 470

Drinking Water Quality Management System Policies Document:

Owner and Top Management Endorsement of The Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-P-05

The Township of South Frontenac, the Owner, and Utilities Kingston, the Operating Authority, support the implementation, maintenance, and continual improvement of a Quality Management System for the Sydenham Drinking Water System as documented in the Sydenham Drinking Water System Operational Plan. This endorsement of the Operational Plan by the Owner’s representatives and by the Operating Authority’s top management acknowledges their commitment to fulfill the responsibilities, duties, and authorities as defined in the Operational Plan, the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard, and the Safe Drinking Water Act. Endorsement

Ron Vandewal Mayor, Township of South Frontenac

Date

Louise Fragnito Chief Administrative Officer, Township of South Frontenac

Date

Kyle Bolton Director of Public Services, Township of South Frontenac

Date

Troy Dunlop Manager of Engineering and Capital Projects

Date

David Fell President and CEO, Utilities Kingston

Date

Heather Roberts Director of Water & Wastewater Services, Utilities Kingston

Date

Vacant Director of Utilities Engineering, Utilities Kingston

Date

Julie Runions Manager of Water & Wastewater Treatment, Utilities Kingston

Date

Chris Leeman Manager of Water & Wastewater System Operations, Utilities Kingston

Date

Revised December 8, 2023

PAGE 1 OF 1

Page 110 of 470 Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Document No:

W-OP-03

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Operational Plan for the

Prepared by Utilities Kingston (1425445 Ontario Limited)

for The Township of South Frontenac Approval

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 1 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 111 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Table of Contents Approval …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Definitions…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

Introduction to the Quality Management System ……………………………………………………………………….. 6
Quality Management System Policy …………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
Commitment and Endorsement ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
Quality Management System Representatives ………………………………………………………………………….. 7
Document and Records Control ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 5.1 Documents ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 5.2 Records ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8
Drinking Water System Description ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 6.1 General…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 6.2 Source Water Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 6.2.1 Events……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 6.2.2 Threats ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 6.2.3 Intake Protection Zones …………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 6.2.4 Operational Challenges ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 6.3 Multiple Barrier Approach………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 6.4 Critical Upstream and Downstream Processes ………………………………………………………………….. 10 6.5 Connections to Other Drinking Water Systems ………………………………………………………………….. 10 6.5.1 Figure 1 – Intake Protection Zones ………………………………………………………………………….. 11 6.6 Water Treatment Facility …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 6.6.1 Sydenham Water Treatment Plant …………………………………………………………………………… 13 6.6.1.1 Raw Water Source …………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 6.6.1.2 Zebra Mussel Control …………………………………………………………………………………. 13 6.6.1.3 Screening …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 6.6.1.4 Low Lift Pumping ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 6.6.1.5 Pre-Chlorination ………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 6.6.1.6 Coagulation / Flocculation …………………………………………………………………………… 13 6.6.1.7 Filtration ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 6.6.1.8 GAC Contactors ………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 6.6.1.9 Process Waste Management ………………………………………………………………………. 14 6.6.1.10 Primary Disinfection …………………………………………………………………………………… 14 6.6.1.11 Secondary Disinfection……………………………………………………………………………….. 14 6.6.1.12 High Lift Pumping ………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 6.6.1.13 Standby Equipment ……………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Figure 2 – Sydenham Water Treatment Plant Process Flow Diagram ……………………………. 15 6.7 Distribution System ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 The Sydenham Elevated Storage Tank …………………………………………………………………….. 17 Figure 3 – Sydenham Drinking Water System Map ……………………………………………………………… 17
Risk Assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18
Risk Assessment Outcomes………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 8.1 Critical Control Limit Monitoring and Response ………………………………………………………………….. 18 8.1.1 Coagulation Critical Control Limit …………………………………………………………………………….. 18 8.1.2 Filter Effluent Turbidity Critical Control Limit ……………………………………………………………… 19 8.1.3 Primary Disinfection Critical Control Limits ……………………………………………………………….. 20 8.1.3.1 Ultraviolet Light Disinfection ………………………………………………………………………… 20 Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 2 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 112 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

8.1.3.2 Chemical Disinfection …………………………………………………………………………………. 20 8.1.3.3 Critical Control Limits …………………………………………………………………………………. 21 8.1.3.4 Secondary Disinfection Critical Control Limit …………………………………………………. 21 9. Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities ……………………………………………… 22 9.1 Organizational Structure and Roles ………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 9.2 Responsibilities ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 9.3 Duties and Authorities …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 10. Competencies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23 10.1 Meeting and Maintaining Competencies ……………………………………………………………………………. 23 11. Personnel Coverage …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 11.1 General…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24 11.2 Treatment Group ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24 11.3 Underground Infrastructure Group ……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 12. QMS Communications ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25 13. Essential Supplies and Services ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 14. Review and Provision of Infrastructure ……………………………………………………………………………………. 25 15. Infrastructure Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Renewal ………………………………………………………….. 25 16. Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring …………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 17. Measurement and Recording Equipment Calibration & Maintenance …………………………………………. 26 18. Emergency Management ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 19. Internal Audits ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 20. Management Review ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 27 21. Continual Improvement of the Quality Management System ……………………………………………………… 27 Appendix A – Schedule “C” Subject System Description Form ………………………………………………………… 28

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 3 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 113 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Definitions Accredited Operating Authority – a person or entity that is given responsibility by the owner for the management, operation, maintenance, or alteration of a drinking water system and has been accredited after demonstrating conformance to the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard to the satisfaction of the accreditation body authorized by the Ministry of Environment. Action Item - a deficiency of the QMS identified through management review which requires corrective action. Annually - A period of one year beginning and ending with the dates conventionally accepted as marking the beginning and end of a year (January 1st to December 31st). Audit – a systematic and documented verification process that involves objectively obtaining and evaluating documents and processes to determine whether a quality management system conforms to the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard. Authority – official permission or approval to carry out tasks and make decisions regarding the drinking water system. Calendar Year - A period of one year beginning and ending with the dates conventionally accepted as marking the beginning and end of a year (January 1st to December 31st). Competence – the combination of observable and measurable knowledge, skills and abilities which are required for a person to carry out assigned duties. Compliance – the fulfillment of a regulatory requirement. Conformance – the fulfillment of a Drinking Water Quality Management Standard requirement Customer – the drinking water end user. Control Measure – includes any processes, physical steps, or other contingencies that have been put in place to prevent or reduce a hazard. Control Point (CP) – a step in the drinking water system process where primary control is applied to prevent or reduce the likely occurrence of a hazardous event with associated drinking water health hazards. Corrective Action – 1) action to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity with the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard, Quality Management System, or other undesirable situations 2) action taken in response to reported adverse water quality identified under Schedule 16 of Ontario Regulation 170/03 to immediately restore proper drinking water disinfection or treatment including any actions taken as directed by the Medical Officer of Health. Critical Control Limit (CCL) – the point at which a critical control point response procedure is initiated. Critical Control Point (CCP) – an essential step in the drinking water system process where primary control measures can be applied, and the results measured to ensure the safety of drinking water delivered to the customer by preventing or eliminating a drinking water health hazard or reducing the hazard to an acceptable level. Document – information recorded or stored by means of any device which is revised to remain current. For the Drinking Water Quality Management System, they include policies, operational plans, procedures, GIS/network drawings, legislation, regulations, and standards, but not records. (See Records). Drinking Water Emergency – a situation or service interruption that may result in the loss of the ability to maintain a supply of safe drinking water to consumers. Drinking Water System – the system of connected works, excluding plumbing, which is established for the purpose of providing users of the system with drinking water.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 4 OF 28

Page 114 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Duty – an authorized task or decision regarding the drinking water system that is required to fulfill responsibilities identified in the Operational Plan and associated procedures. DWQMS – Drinking Water Quality Management Standard. Emergency – a situation which requires immediate action to protect and preserve the health, safety and welfare of persons and to limit or prevent damage and destruction of property, infrastructure and the environment. Emergency Response – the effort to mitigate the impact of an emergency on customers. Hazard – a source of danger or a property that may cause drinking water to be unsafe for human consumption. The hazard may be biological, chemical, physical, or radiological in nature. Hazardous Event – an incident or situation that can lead to the presence of a hazard. Infrastructure – the set of interconnected structural elements that provide the framework for supporting the operation of the drinking water system, including buildings, workspace, process equipment, hardware and software, and supporting services, such as transportation or communication. Major Drinking Water Emergency – an emergency which is adversely affecting or will adversely affect the supply of safe drinking water to a significant portion of the system or to critical facilities such as hospitals, nursing homes and medical clinics. Minimum Critical Control Point (Minimum CCP) – an essential step in the drinking water system process where control measures must be applied to meet minimum treatment requirements for primary and secondary disinfection as outlined in the Procedure for Disinfection of Water in Ontario. MECP – Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks. Monitoring – checks or systems that are available to detect hazards or the potential for hazards Non-compliance – the failure to fulfill a regulatory requirement. Non-conformance – the failure to fulfill a Drinking Water Quality Management Standard or quality management system requirement. Operating Authority – Utilities Kingston, as authorized by the owner to undertake the management, operation, maintenance or alteration of the drinking water system. Owner – The Township of South Frontenac. Potential Major Drinking Water Emergency – an emergency with the potential to adversely affect the supply of safe drinking water to a significant portion of the system or to critical facilities such as hospitals, nursing homes and medical clinics. Preventative Action – Action to prevent the occurrence of nonconformity of the QMS with the requirements of the DWQMS or another undesirable situation). Quality Management System (QMS) – a system to establish policy and objectives, achieve those objectives, and direct and control an organization with regard to quality. Record – information recorded or stored by means of any device which provides proof of activities performed and results achieved. For the Drinking Water Quality Management System, they include log books, laboratory test results, water quality data, system performance data, completed operation and maintenance forms, photographs, audio/video recordings, and “As Built”/record drawings. Responsibility – an overarching requirement, identified in the Operational Plan, for which persons having duties and authorities impacting the safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer are held accountable. Role – a management or staff position within Utilities Kingston for which responsibilities, duties, and authorities have been identified. The Standard – the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 5 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 115 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Introduction to the Quality Management System

This document is the Drinking Water Quality Management System Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System. It has been developed in response to legislated requirements resulting from recommendations contained within the Report of the Walkerton Inquiry. In Part Two, Report of the Walkerton Inquiry, Justice Dennis R. O’Conner recommended that municipal water providers adopt a “quality management” approach for the operation of drinking water systems in Ontario. Also recommended by Justice O’Conner was the development of a quality management standard specific to drinking water systems and the accreditation of operating agencies based on the implementation of quality management systems conforming to that standard. These recommendations have been mandated through the Safe Drinking Water Act. The Safe Drinking Water Act requires the owner of a municipal residential drinking water system to ensure that the system is operated by an Accredited Operating Authority. To become accredited, an Operating Authority must establish and maintain a Quality Management System, documented in an Operational Plan, which meets the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard for Ontario. The Ministry of Environment, with assistance from water industry stakeholders, has developed the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard specifically to meet the needs of municipal residential drinking water systems in Ontario. The Drinking Water Quality Management Standard contains elements of both the International Organization for Standardization’s ISO 9001 quality management system standard and the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) standard. The Standard specifies minimum requirements to facilitate an Operating Authority’s ability to consistently produce and deliver drinking water that meets legislative, regulatory and owner requirements, and to enhance consumer protection through the effective application and continual improvement of a Quality Management System. The process to develop, implement and maintain the Quality Management System required by the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard is divided into three steps; PLAN/DO, CHECK, and IMPROVE. These steps are cyclic which enables the continuous evolution and improvement of the Quality Management System. The Drinking Water Quality Management Standard is comprised of twenty-one elements; eighteen PLAN/DO elements, two CHECK elements, and one IMPROVE element. PLAN/DO elements deal with the development and implementation of an Operational Plan; CHECK elements deal with reviewing the effectiveness of the Quality Management System through internal audits and management reviews; and the IMPROVE element requires an Operating Authority to strive to continually improve its Quality Management System through the use of corrective and preventative actions in addition to the review and consideration to applicable best management practices published by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks.. Each of the numbered sections in this document corresponds to a required element in the Standard. As the Operating Authority for the Sydenham Drinking Water System, owned by the Township of South Frontenac, Utilities Kingston has developed this Operational Plan to meet the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard and to ensure the continued safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the community through the efficient and effective use of resources.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 6 OF 28

Page 116 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Quality Management System Policy

The Quality Management System Policy for the Sydenham Drinking Water System – W-P-04 has been reviewed and approved by Top Management. Quality Management System Policy for the Sydenham Drinking Water System Utilities Kingston is a community based corporation dedicated to the responsible management of safe and reliable integrated services. Our mission is to manage, operate and maintain community infrastructure to deliver safe, reliable services and a personal customer experience, guided by our values of safety, integrity, innovation and reliability. Our vision is to advance the unique multi-utility model to benefit our customers and build better communities. Utilities Kingston, acting as the Operating Authority for the Sydenham Drinking Water System, owned by the Township of South Frontenac, is committed to providing a safe and reliable supply of drinking water to our customers. Through the development, implementation, maintenance, and continual improvement of a Quality Management System, the management and staff of Utilities Kingston will ensure the continued safety and security of the drinking water supply by meeting or exceeding the requirements of all relevant legislation and regulations, and the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard.

Commitment and Endorsement

This Operational Plan has been endorsed by Utilities Kingston Top Management and the Township of South Frontenac. The Owner and Top Management Endorsement of the Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System – W-P-05 has been signed by the Township of South Frontenac’s representatives and Utilities Kingston Top Management. Owner and Top Management Endorsement of Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System The Township of South Frontenac, the Owner, and Utilities Kingston, the Operating Authority, support the implementation, maintenance, and continual improvement of a Quality Management System for the Sydenham Drinking Water System as documented in the Sydenham Drinking Water System Operational Plan. This endorsement of the Operational Plan by the Owner’s representatives and by the Operating Authority’s top management acknowledges their commitment to fulfill the responsibilities, duties, and authorities as defined in the Operational Plan, the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard, and the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Quality Management System Representatives

A Quality Management System Representative(s) and an alternate are appointed and authorized by Top Management to administer the Drinking Water Quality Management System. The responsibilities of the QMS Representatives are: •

ensuring that processes and procedures for the Drinking Water QMS are established and maintained,

•

reporting to Top Management on the performance of the Drinking Water QMS and any need for improvement,

•

promoting awareness of the Drinking Water QMS throughout the Operating Authority

•

ensuring that current versions of documents required by the Drinking Water QMS are being used at all times,

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 7 OF 28

Page 117 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

•

at least annually, reviewing the Drinking Water QMS policies to ensure that they remain current and appropriate for the QMS and the subject system, and recommending any required changes to the QMS policies to Top Management for approval,

•

ensuring that the Operational Plans and associated procedures are reviewed at least annually to verify that they remain consistent with current legislation, regulations, and operational conditions and processes,

•

ensuring that new and revised QMS controlled documents are reviewed by personnel most familiar with the affected processes prior to recommending approval,

•

review and recommend approval of revisions to the Operational Plan and associated procedures to the Director of Engineering, Human Resources and Treatment Operations, and the Director, Operations,

•

ensuring that annual internal audits are completed as described in this operational plan,

•

preparing an annual report which includes all information required for annual Management Reviews of the Drinking Water QMS

•

external audit liaison

The Alternate QMS Representative provides assistance to meet these responsibilities and performs all duties of the QMS Representatives should the QMS Representatives be unavailable. The designated QMS Representative(s) and Alternate QMS Representative have acknowledged their responsibilities, duties, and authorities as described in this Operational Plan by signing the Quality Management System Representative for the Sydenham Drinking Water System Acknowledgement of Responsibilities – W-P-06.

Document and Records Control

5.1

Documents

Documents provide the foundation for the development and ongoing maintenance of the quality management system. They include QMS policies, operational plans, procedures, GIS/network drawings, legislation, regulations, standards, and records. Documents other than records must be revised to reflect current legislation, regulations, and operational conditions and processes. Consistent control ensures that documents remain current and accurate, and are available and accessible for use when and where required. The Document Control Procedure – W-G-01 describes the methods used to control the creation, approval, distribution, and revision of internal and external documents related to the Drinking Water QMS.

5.2

Records

Records are documents which provide proof of activities performed and results achieved. Unlike other documents which must be revised to reflect current conditions, records provide historical evidence and must not be changed. They include log books, laboratory test results, water quality data, system performance data, completed operation and maintenance forms, photographs, audio/video recordings, and “As Built”/record drawings. The Records Control Procedure – W-G-02 describes the methods used to ensure that records are sufficiently maintained to demonstrate compliance with legislative, regulatory, and Drinking Water Quality Management Standard requirements, Drinking Water QMS requirements and to provide historical information that is accessible for operational and planning purposes.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 8 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Drinking Water System Description

6.1

General

Page 118 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

The Sydenham Drinking Water System, owned by the Township of South Frontenac and operated by Utilities Kingston, provides safe drinking water to the Village of Sydenham. The system is comprised of a Class 2 water treatment plant supplying water to a Class 1 distribution system which includes one elevated storage tank.

6.2

Source Water Overview

The source of water treated by this water treatment facility is Sydenham Lake. The intake is located 128m east of the treatment plant, at approximately 6m of water depth. The tributary water sources to Sydenham Lake are granite based to the north and limestone based to the south, resulting in a unique raw water chemistry for treatment. The raw water drawn from this location is slightly elevated in dissolved solids, organic carbon and alkalinity. The water is slightly basic and marginally hard with an average hardness of 134 mg/l as CaCo3. Seasonal changes and wind direction can greatly affect raw water turbidities which can range from 0.3 to 10 NTU. Seasonal raw water temperature fluctuations are significant. Raw water temperatures at the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant have ranged from as low as 1 degree Celsius in the winter months to as high as 22 degrees Celsius in the summer months. Chemical, physical and bacteriological raw water quality data indicates a raw water source of good quality.

6.2.1 Events Seasonal changes in raw water quality during the spring thaw can cause an increase in organic loading within Sydenham Lake. This event typically referred to as the spring runoff, can last a few days or even weeks depending on weather and temperature. Summer and fall water quality can also fluctuate due to algae growth, wind direction and strength, and recreational traffic resulting in elevated water turbidities. Operators must be prepared to make appropriate process adjustments to treat the elevated turbidities during these events. Changes in water temperature will also impact treatment process performance (coagulation and disinfection). Optimal treatment requires timely adjustments to treatment chemical dosages in response to temperature fluctuations.

6.2.2 Threats Sydenham Lake is subject to seasonal recreation traffic and indirect discharges from agricultural runoff which are potential sources of contamination. While the risk of source water contamination is ever present the immediate risk of contamination of the drinking water system as a result is considered to be minimal due to the following factors: •

Ongoing monitoring of raw water quality

•

Continuously monitored water treatment processes

The potential for toxin producing cyanobacteria algae blooms is present in lakes with high phosphorus and nitrogen levels and warming water temperatures that can increase their frequency and size. As a result, a Harmful Algal Bloom monitoring, reporting, and sampling plan has been implemented.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 9 OF 28

Page 119 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

6.2.3 Intake Protection Zones The Cataraqui Source Protection Plan has identified Intake Protection Zones for the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant. An intake protection zone (IPZ) shows where surface water is coming from to supply a municipal intake at a water treatment plant and how fast it is travelling toward the intake. The size and shape of each zone represents either a set distance around the intake, or the length of time water that could be carrying a contaminant would take to reach the intake over land or water: IPZ 1 is a set area, generally a one-kilometre radius around the intake; IPZ 2 is defined by the movement of water and is sized to encompass a two-hour time of travel for a contaminant to reach the intake; IPZ 3 is an area of special interest. For the Sydenham intake, IPZ 3 is defined based on the lakes and streams that contribute water to the intake. The Intake Protection Zones are shown in Figure 1 – Intake Protection Zones.

6.2.4 Operational Challenges Raw water drawn from Sydenham Lake is generally low in bacteriological contamination and turbidity. During seasonal turbidity and temperature fluctuations as well as during spring runoff, operational changes are required to maintain optimal coagulant dosages to ensure adequate turbidity removal while also maintaining filter performance and minimizing aluminum residual carryover. Operational challenges during seasonal events may require deviations from normal operations. With these seasonal events, the operator may be required to increase the frequency and/or duration of filter backwashes to reduce filter clogging.

6.3

Multiple Barrier Approach

A multiple barrier approach to preventing drinking water contamination is employed by Utilities Kingston to ensure that drinking water supplied by the system is both safe and of high quality. Barriers employed within the supply system include source water treatment by chemically assisted filtration, primary disinfection through UV light application and chlorination, secondary disinfection through chlorination, continuous monitoring and automated control of treatment processes and distribution system facilities, and the utilization of system redundancies and standby equipment.

6.4

Critical Upstream and Downstream Processes

Utilities Kingston does not currently rely upon any critical processes upstream or downstream of the Sydenham Drinking Water System to ensure the provision of safe drinking water.

6.5

Connections to Other Drinking Water Systems

The Sydenham Drinking Water System is not connected to any other drinking water system.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 10 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

6.5.1 Figure 1 – Intake Protection Zones

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 11 OF 28

Page 120 of 470

Version 8.0

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

This page left blank by design

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 12 OF 28

Page 121 of 470

Version 8.0

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

6.6

Page 122 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Water Treatment Facility

6.6.1 Sydenham Water Treatment Plant Drinking water is supplied to the distribution system by the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant which is a Class 2 water treatment facility with a rated capacity of 1,290m3/day. The water treatment plant is located at 4410 Point Road. Figure 2 – Sydenham Water Treatment Plant Process Flow Diagram provides a graphic representation of the water treatment process.

6.6.1.1

Raw Water Source

The source of water treated by this water treatment facility is Sydenham Lake. The intake is located 128m east of the treatment plant, at approximately 6m of water depth. Water flows by gravity from the lake through a 400mm intake pipe to the low lift pumping well.

6.6.1.2

Zebra Mussel Control

Chloraminated (treated) water is conveyed through a 25mm polyethylene tube installed inside the intake pipe and injected through a diffuser at the raw water intake for zebra mussel control.

6.6.1.3

Screening

Two stationary screens located in the low lift pumping well remove objects such as weeds, fish, sticks, and other debris from the water.

6.6.1.4

Low Lift Pumping

Three submersible low lift pumps (two duty pumps and one standby pump) lift water from the low lift pumping well to the process building through the low lift discharge header. The flow rate of raw water pumped through the low lift discharge header is continuously monitored

6.6.1.5

Pre-Chlorination

While not typically practiced, a Sodium Hypochlorite application point in the low lift discharge header allows for pre-filtration disinfection.

6.6.1.6

Coagulation / Flocculation

A liquid coagulant, Polyaluminum Chloride (PACl), is added to the raw water in the low lift discharge header as it enters the process building just prior to passing through the in-line static mixer. PACl promotes flocculation (the clumping together of very fine particles and their subsequent grouping to form larger particles). The formation of these ‘floc’ masses improves the plant’s filtration process. Water flows through the static mixer in a spiral motion ensuring proper mixing of the PACl with the water for effective flocculation.

6.6.1.7

Filtration

Water flows from the static mixer to three pressure filtration tanks containing a ceramic filtration media. The filters remove particulate impurities from the water. Water flows through the filters into two baffled contact tanks. Filters are backwashed at a minimum of every 48 hours to remove the particulates they have collected. Clean water from the clear well (high lift pump chamber) is pumped backwards through the filters, and the filters are agitated by air scouring the filter media to break up any large particles.

6.6.1.8

GAC Contactors

During periods of high dissolved organic content in the source water, filter effluent water is directed to two pressure filtration tanks containing granular activated carbon (GAC). The GAC contactors assist Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 13 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 123 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

in the removal of dissolved organics which react with chlorine to produce chlorination byproducts. The GAC contactors are periodically backwashed to remove the particulates they have collected.

6.6.1.9

Process Waste Management

Effluent water from the backwash process is directed to a backwash storage tank for further settling. The supernatant (the clear water at the top of the tank after settling) is directed back to Sydenham Lake and the settled sludge is mechanically removed and sent for further treatment.

6.6.1.10 Primary Disinfection Primary disinfection of the filtered water is achieved via UV light and free chlorine residual. 2 UV reactors (duty/standby) each using 12 low pressure high output lamps, provide the UV light disinfection. Free chlorine disinfection follows the UV process with the use of two chemical metering pumps (duty/standby) which provide sodium hypochlorite to an application point downstream of the UV reactors at the entrance to the detention piping. Diversion to waste valves, located upstream of the treated water reservoirs, operate automatically to divert water to the process waste tanks at process start up and whenever residual or log removal targets are not met.

6.6.1.11 Secondary Disinfection Secondary disinfection is the maintenance of a disinfectant residual throughout the distribution system which is achieved with chloramines. Following the free chlorine disinfection process, ammonium sulphate is added with the use of two chemical metering pumps (duty/standby), at an approximate rate of 4:1 ratio (chlorine/ammonia), to react with the free chlorine residual to form chloramines. The application dosages of sodium hypochlorite and ammonium sulphate is adjusted to produce a sufficient in plant combined chlorine residual to ensure that minimum residuals are maintained in the distribution system.

6.6.1.12 High Lift Pumping Water from the clearwell (high lift pump chamber) is pumped into the distribution system by three high lift pumps (two duty pumps and one standby pump). The flow rate of treated water pumped to the distribution system is continuously monitored.

6.6.1.13 Standby Equipment A 130 kW standby diesel generator provides electricity to the water plant during power interruptions. The generator and standby equipment is tested regularly to ensure proper operation when required.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 14 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Figure 2 – Sydenham Water Treatment Plant Process Flow Diagram

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 15 OF 28

Page 124 of 470

Version 8.0

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

The page left blank by design

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 16 OF 28

Page 125 of 470

Version 8.0

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

6.7

Page 126 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Distribution System

The Class 1 Sydenham Distribution System is comprised of approximately 6.8 km of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) water mains ranging in size from 150mm to 250mm. The distribution system also includes 1 elevated storage tank, 39 main line valves, and 50 fire hydrants and their associated isolation valves. Once all connections to the distribution system have been completed, the drinking water system will supply water to 285 customer connections.

6.7.1 The Sydenham Elevated Storage Tank The Sydenham Elevated Storage Tank is located at 4252 Stage Coach Road. The tank has a storage capacity of 1,019m3. The tank provides storage and system pressure stabilization for the distribution system. During normal system operation, the water level in the tank provides the primary control of pump operations at the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant.

Figure 3 – Sydenham Drinking Water System Map

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 17 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 127 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Risk Assessment

Utilities Kingston has developed the Risk Assessment Procedure – W-G-03 to ensure that potential hazardous events and the resulting drinking water health hazards are identified and that appropriate monitoring, control, and response measures are developed to mitigate the risks associated with the hazards. This is achieved through a process of identifying potential hazardous events and associated drinking water health hazards. Assessing the risks associated with those hazards by assigning values for probability, consequence and detectability. Identifying and assessing existing control and response measures, identifying Critical Control Points, establishing Critical Control Limits, and ensuring that monitoring and response processes and procedures are in place to respond to deviations from those limits. Potential risks and hazardous events identified for deliberation by the MECP must also be considered while completing a risk assessment. The results of the risk assessments are documented in the following section.

Risk Assessment Outcomes

The identification of hazardous events associated drinking water health hazards, and the assessment of the associated risks for the Sydenham Drinking Water System is completed on a three year cycle. The risk assessment team included experienced drinking water operators and supervisory personnel. The risk assessment findings for the identified events are documented in W-L-11s Sydenham Risk Assessment Outcomes. Events/hazards are listed by event classification in descending order of controlled risk. The controlled risk value represents the relative risk of each event/hazard, considering the control measures in place and the response measures available, when compared to the range of values for all events/hazards assessed for the system. Each event/hazard combination has been classified in the following categories: •

Event Classification – Events have been classified as either controlled or uncontrolled based on the availability of primary control measures to prevent or reduce the probability of the hazardous event. Each event is further classified as high, moderate, or low risk according to the risk value found during the assessment, the assigned consequence value, and the controlled risk value.

•

Controlled Risk Classification – The controlled risk for each event/hazard has been classified as high, moderate, or low based on the risk level after considering the available control and response measures and the potential consequence of the event.

•

Control Point Classification – Control Points and Critical Control Points (CCP) are identified based on whether the process step is required by the Procedure for the Disinfection of Drinking Water in Ontario (Minimum CCP), is essential for the delivery of safe drinking water, primary control of the event can be applied, and the results of that control are measurable.

8.1

Critical Control Limit Monitoring and Response

As a result of the risk assessment results, the following Critical Control Limits have been identified and associated response procedures developed for the Sydenham Drinking Water System with the assistance of qualified Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Operators. Each section identifies the Critical Control Limit and describes how the measured parameters are monitored and the considerations and rationale used to determine the limit. The Critical Control Limit Response Procedures referenced describe the response and reporting requirements for measured parameter.

8.1.1 Coagulation Critical Control Limit Raw water coagulation ensures proper suspended solids removal through floc formation and agglomeration. Correct floc formation is important for adequate filtration of raw water that has the potential for microbiological contamination. Duty and standby chemical metering pumps equipped with

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 18 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 128 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

an automatic switchover system and flow sensing switches are used to deliver coagulant to the application point at the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant. The Procedure for Disinfection of Drinking Water in Ontario requires that a chemical coagulant be used at all times when a treatment plant that uses conventional or direct filtration is in operation. The dosing of coagulant is directly monitored by confirmation of equipment functionality through the SCADA system, which generates an alarm should a coagulant pump fail. The Critical Control Limit for Coagulation is the generation of a coagulant pump failure alarm. Prompt investigation of this alarm condition is required to ensure the continued dosing of coagulant. The Sydenham Drinking Water System Coagulation Critical Control Limit Response Procedure – W-CC-07 describes the response to a coagulant pump failure alarm. The effectiveness of coagulant dosing is monitored through the continuous measurement of filter effluent turbidities. Filter effluent turbidities are monitored on a continuous basis to ensure filter effluent quality meets the regulatory requirements for drinking water. Filter effluent turbidity alarms may indicate a problem associated with the coagulation process. The investigation of coagulant dosages and coagulation equipment operation is included as part of the Sydenham Drinking Water System Filter Effluent Turbidity Critical Control Limit Response Procedure W-CC-08.

8.1.2 Filter Effluent Turbidity Critical Control Limit Filtration processes provide for the removal of suspended solids and floc particles that are created through coagulant addition. The Sydenham Water Treatment Plant uses three pressure filtration tanks containing a ceramic filtration media to remove suspended solids from the water prior to the primary disinfection process. Filtration performance is monitored continuously through filter effluent turbidimeters installed on each filter effluent line. Trending through SCADA systems allows for operator interpretation and alarm response capability. Regulatory limits on filter effluent turbidities have two specific values of concern. Schedule 16 of Ontario Regulation 170/03 specifies that filter effluent turbidity exceeding 1.0 NTU for longer than 15 consecutive minutes is an adverse condition and must be reported as such. The Procedure for the Disinfection of Water in Ontario specifies that the filtration process must meet the performance criterion for filtered water turbidity of less than or equal to 0.3 NTU in 95% of the measurements each month in order to claim the facility specific log removal credits used in disinfection CT calculations. The alarm set point of 0.3 NTU allows for operator response to elevated turbidity levels well before reaching the regulatory limit of 1.0 NTU and ensures only limited periods of turbidity levels above 0.3 NTU to meet the performance criterion for filtered water turbidity of less than or equal to 0.3 NTU in 95% of the measurements each month. Operators at the King Street and Point Pleasant Water Treatment Plants, in the City of Kingston, have the ability to remotely initiate a filter backwash through the SCADA system. Continuous operator coverage at the King Street Water Treatment Plant and the availability of standby operators ensures a very timely response to an alarm and initiation of the corrective action process. With consideration of these factors, a critical control limit of 0.3 NTU for no longer than 30 minutes, can be established. This limit allows for short term filter effluent turbidity spikes above 0.3 NTU, due to operational conditions, which do not pose a threat and enables the identification of more persistent or severe operational conditions which could adversely affect drinking water quality.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 19 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 129 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

The Sydenham Drinking Water System Filter Effluent Critical Control Limit Response Procedure – WCC-08 describes the response to a filter effluent turbidity alarm and possible exceedance of the critical control limit.

8.1.3 Primary Disinfection Critical Control Limits The use of ultraviolet light exposure and chlorination for primary disinfection ensures adequate inactivation of pathogens potentially present in the source water that have not been removed by filtration. As a direct filtration plant, the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant is credited with 2 log removal for Giardia and Cryptosporidium, and with 1 log removal for viruses. Removal rates required for surface water plants are 2 log for Cryptosporidium, 3 log for Giardia, and 4 log for viruses. This leaves requirements for disinfection at 1 log removal for Giardia and 3 log removal for viruses.

8.1.3.1

Ultraviolet Light Disinfection

The disinfection through ultraviolet light is accomplished by exposing filtered water flowing through either of two installed UV reactors with a minimum 40 mJ/cm2 dose of UV light at a filtered water ultraviolet light transmittance (UVT) of at least 75%. The UV reactors have been validated to inactivate protozoa and bacteria (fulfilling the remaining requirement for 1 log removal of Giardia) at the dosage noted above. Therefore, only the regulated requirement for chemical disinfection for viruses remains. The UV dose is monitored continuously. At less than a 40 mJ/cm 2 dose the process is automatically shut down and an alarm is generated. Filtered water grab samples are routinely collected to ensure a UVT of at least 75%.

8.1.3.2

Chemical Disinfection

The remaining 3 log inactivation of viruses is accomplished through the application of chlorine using sodium hypochlorite delivery pumps. The following parameters together are used in determining the achieved disinfectant CT and are trended on SCADA programs and compared to the required CT to give a log removal achieved value. •

Temperature of the water prior to contact tank entry is monitored continuously with a temperature sensor. Temperature is a parameter that changes based on seasonal variations and cannot be controlled through operational process.

•

pH is monitored continuously prior to contact tank entry locations with a pH probe. pH is a parameter that changes with variations in water quality on a seasonal basis.

•

Flow Rate is monitored continuously. The rate of flow varies continually based on distribution system demand.

•

Detention Time within the chlorine contact piping is calculated continuously through SCADA based on the flow rate.

•

Free Chlorine Residual is monitored continuously using Cl2 analyzers. Free residual varies slightly as dosages and chlorine demand of the water changes.

Achieved CT must be at least 100% of the required CT, which varies with water quality, to ensure that the required 3 log inactivation of viruses is achieved.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 20 OF 28

Page 130 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Achieved CT must be at least 100% of the required CT, which varies with water quality.

All of these parameters vary on an instantaneous basis. If one or any combination of these parameters indicates that the resulting achieved CT value may reach less than 100% of the required CT, proper corrective actions must be implemented. Alarm set points for the monitored parameters are set at levels which indicate conditions, outside of normal operational variance, with the potential to negatively affect the disinfection process and allow sufficient time for operators to adjust controllable variables or restart disrupted processes to ensure that drinking water quality is not adversely affected. Operators at the King Street and Point Pleasant Water Treatment Plants have the ability to remotely adjust system processes through the SCADA system. Continuous operator coverage at the King Street Water Treatment Plant and the availability of standby operators ensures a very timely response to an alarm and initiation of the corrective action process.

8.1.3.3

Critical Control Limits

The critical control limits must be established at a levels which allow sufficient time for operators to identify and respond to events or conditions which are having an unfavorable effect on the disinfection processes to ensure effective disinfection is maintained and adverse water quality is avoided. With consideration of these factors, the following critical control limits for primary disinfection have been established. •

No less than 150% of the required CT (manual calculation)

•

UV lamp fail alarm

•

No less than 75% filtered water UVT

The Sydenham Drinking Water System Primary Disinfection Critical Control Limit Response Procedure – W-CC-09 describes the response to measured parameter alarms and possible exceedance of the critical control limit.

8.1.3.4

Secondary Disinfection Critical Control Limit

Secondary disinfection ensures an adequate disinfectant residual within all areas of the distribution system. Chloramination is the method employed in the Sydenham Drinking Water System for the maintenance of secondary disinfection residuals. Following the free chlorine primary disinfection step, ammonium sulphate is added at an approximate 4:1 ratio (free chlorine to ammonia), to react with the free chlorine residual to form chloramines for secondary disinfection. Chlorine and ammonium sulphate dosage rates and the resulting Cl2 residuals at the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant are monitored and adjusted to ensure that adequate combined Cl2 residuals are maintained at the furthest points from the water treatment plant discharge. The ongoing effectiveness of chlorine and ammonium sulphate dosage rates is monitored through the collection and testing of distribution system samples described by the Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring Procedure – W-G-09.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 21 OF 28

Page 131 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Secondary disinfection is monitored continuously through Cl2 residual analyzers installed at the Sydenham Elevated Storage Tank and confirmed through distribution system grab samples collected on a regular basis. SCADA programs allow for the measurement, control, trending, and alarming of distribution system Cl2 residual values. Alarm set points for Cl2 residuals at the water treatment plant and elevated storage tank are set at levels which indicate conditions, outside of normal operational variance, with the potential to negatively affect secondary disinfection effectiveness and allow sufficient time for operators to carry out flushing, adjust chlorine and ammonium sulphate dosages, or restart disrupted processes to ensure that drinking water safety is not adversely affected. Operators at the King Street and Point Pleasant Water Treatment Plants have the ability to remotely monitor and/or adjust system processes through SCADA. Continuous operator coverage at the King Street Water Treatment Plant and the availability of standby operators ensures a very timely response to an alarm and initiation of the corrective action process. With consideration of these factors, the critical control limit for distribution system combined Cl2 residual can be established at no less than 1.00mg/L. This level allows sufficient time for operators to undertake corrective action to ensure that adverse water quality is avoided. The Sydenham Drinking Water System Secondary Disinfection Critical Control Limit Response Procedure – W-CC-10 describes the response to measured parameter alarms and possible exceedance of the critical control limit.

Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

9.1

Organizational Structure and Roles

The City of Kingston is the sole shareholder of the Ontario Business Corporation 1425445 Ontario Limited, operating as Utilities Kingston. Utilities Kingston currently provides five different utility services to its customers; water, wastewater, electric, natural gas, and a fibre optic network. W-L-13s – Sydenham Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities, and Competencies provides a summary view of Utilities Kingston’s organizational structure. Roles which are displayed in the chart within a blue coloured cell have duties and authorities which impact the safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer. The responsibilities, duties and authorities of these roles are described in detail. Roles and groups which are displayed in the chart within an uncoloured cell do not have duties and authorities which directly impact the safe and reliable supply of drinking water although they may provide services which support the activities of those accountable for the safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer.

9.2

Responsibilities

There are four overarching responsibilities under this Operational Plan for which persons having duties and authorities impacting the safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer must be held accountable. Those responsibilities are: •

The provision of a safe and secure supply of drinking water

•

The identification, obtainment and provision of sufficient resources to ensure the continued safe and secure supply of drinking water

•

Ensuring regulatory compliance with regard to drinking water system operations

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 22 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System •

Page 132 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Supporting the development, implementation, and continual improvement of a Quality Management System for the drinking water system

9.3

Duties and Authorities

W-L-13s – Sydenham Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities, and Competencies This section describes the duties and authorities of those persons or groups accountable for the safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer.

Competencies

This section describes the competencies, certification, and training requirements for personnel performing duties directly affecting drinking water quality by monitoring, maintaining, and adjusting drinking water system processes, directing changes and adjustments to drinking water system processes, or having duties related to the design, construction, and inspection of drinking water system infrastructure. W-L-13s – Sydenham Organizational Structure, Roles, Responsibilities, Authorities, and Competencies identifies the current required competencies, certification, and training for Utilities Kingston personnel charged with these duties as well as some specific desired competencies. The required drinking water certifications for the Director(s), and Manager(s), are not identified by the table; desired certifications are identified. Utilities Kingston does ensure that sufficient certifications are held and maintained by management personnel to ensure effective oversight of drinking water system operation that meets regulatory requirements. •

Competency level 1 indicates that a basic technical proficiency and/or basic knowledge and understanding of a skill or subject area are required. Level 1 competency can be obtained through a combination of education, theoretical and practical instruction, and participation in specialty courses and workshops.

•

Competency level 2 indicates that a good technical proficiency and working knowledge and understanding of a skill or subject area are required. Level 2 competency can be obtained through a combination of education, theoretical and practical instruction, participation in specialty workshops and courses, and work experience.

•

Competency level 3 indicates that an advanced technical proficiency and theoretical and working knowledge and understanding of a particular skill or subject area are required. Level 3 competencies can be achieved through various combinations of education in engineering, science, or other related fields, directly related training, extensive work experience, and regular participation at specialty workshops and courses.

10.1

Meeting and Maintaining Competencies

The Operator Training Procedure – W-G-04 describes how Drinking Water Operators are provided with sufficient training to comply with legislated requirements and to meet and maintain the competency and certification requirements identified in this Operational Plan. Utilities Kingston encourages Operators to attain competencies and certifications above the minimum requirements. Operators that have met the required competencies and certifications are given the opportunity to receive Competency Enhancement Training as described in the Operator Training Program. These training opportunities are provided to allow Operators to acquire enhanced knowledge and skills and to assist in meeting the education requirements for upgrading Drinking Water Operator Certificates beyond the required levels identified. Proof of training records are maintained in the personnel files maintained by Human Resources and information regarding training for all operators is tracked electronically in the City Of Kingston’s Human Resources Management System (People Soft HRMS). Training information tracked by this system

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 23 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 133 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

includes course/training descriptions, training providers, training scheduled and completed, total hours of training completed, and total hours of Director approved training completed.

Personnel Coverage

11.1

General

The Personnel Coverage Procedure – W-G-05 describes how Utilities Kingston ensures that sufficient personnel are available to provide a safe and reliable supply of drinking water to the customer. The procedure deals primarily with the processes and protocols used to ensure that sufficient qualified and competent Water Treatment and Water Distribution System Operators are available and that Overall Responsible Operators and Operators in Charge are designated. Utilities Kingston employs certified operators to operate and maintain the Sydenham Drinking Water System. All personnel employed within Utilities Kingston Water Operations, in a role identified in the Competencies Table, must meet the minimum competency and certification requirements described in the table. The Director of Engineering, Human Resources and Treatment Operations, Director, Operations, Manager of Water and Wastewater Treatment Operations, Manager of Water and Wastewater Underground Infrastructure, Water and Wastewater Treatment Supervisors and the Water and Wastewater Underground Infrastructure Supervisor form the management team responsible for coordinating and directing the activities of workers employed within the Water and Wastewater Operations Group under the terms and conditions of a collective agreement between Utilities Kingston and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

11.2

Treatment Group

Operators within the Treatment Group are certified as Water Treatment Operators. The operation of the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant is continuously monitored through a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. The SCADA system allows for remote monitoring and operation of the treatment and pumping processes from the King Street or Point Pleasant Water Treatment Plants located in the City of Kingston. A shift Operator is on duty at all times at the King Street Water Treatment Plant. Local process control is available through the SCADA panel at the Sydenham Water Treatment Plant. Treatment Operators and Journeypersons perform regular rounds and routine maintenance at the plant. Alarm conditions are forwarded to operators via cell phones. Under normal operating conditions, this system allows operators to perform duties away from the treatment plant. Operator coverage for weekday off hours, weekends, and holidays is ensured through the use of 24 hour Operator coverage at the King Street Water Treatment Plant and standby and call out rotation schedules. The Underground Infrastructure Group provides assistance in instances where specific knowledge, skills, or equipment is an asset.

11.3

Underground Infrastructure Group

Operators within the Underground Infrastructure Group are certified as both Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Operators. Assistance is available from the Treatment Group in those instances where specific knowledge, skills, or equipment is an asset. The Underground Infrastructure Group’s base of operations is at the Utilities Kingston Service Centre located at 91 Lappan’s Lane in the City of Kingston. Regular working hours are from 7:30am to 4:00pm, Monday through Friday. Operator coverage for weekday off hours, weekends, and holidays is ensured through the use of standby and call out rotation schedules.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 24 OF 28

Page 134 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

QMS Communications

The QMS Communications Procedure – W-G-06 describes how relevant aspects of the Drinking Water QMS are communicated to and between Utilities Kingston Top Management, System Owners, Utilities Kingston personnel, the public, and providers of essential supplies and services. Utilities Kingston Top Management communicates with the Owner with regard to drinking water system issues and the Drinking Water QMS through reports to the Chief Administrative Officer and Council.

Essential Supplies and Services

Documentation of applicable licensing, certification and accreditation ensures quality in the supplies and services employed by Utilities Kingston in the maintenance of infrastructure, and in the processes required to provide drinking water to our customers. Specifically, Utilities Kingston requires suppliers of treatment chemicals and other materials coming into contact with drinking water to provide current documentation that those products have undergone testing and have met the AWWA and ANSI standards (NSF/60, NSF/61), and CALA accreditation for those providing laboratory testing services. In addition to this, Utilities Kingston may also require other licensing, accreditation, certification and verification documentation as noted in its policies and procedures. The Essential Supplies and Services List – W-L-06 identifies those supplies and services considered essential to the continued supply of safe drinking water to the customer and the primary and alternate suppliers.

Review and Provision of Infrastructure

Regular evaluation and review of the condition and capacity of drinking water systems and their components is required to ensure the continued provision of safe drinking water to the customer. At least annually and as described by the Sydenham Drinking Water System Review and Provision of Infrastructure Procedure – W-G-07S, an evaluation of drinking water system infrastructure condition and capacity through the review of available information including relevant outcomes of the risk assessment is completed to identify any needed rehabilitation, renewal and improvement of existing infrastructure and provision of new infrastructure, prioritize those identified needs, and make recommendations to the system Owner based on the prioritized needs. Recommendations made to the Owner must include the need for any: •

New infrastructure required due to regulatory, growth, or maintenance requirements

•

Improvements to existing infrastructure required due to regulatory, growth, or maintenance requirements

•

Rehabilitation and renewal of existing infrastructure based on condition assessments and maintenance requirements

Infrastructure Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Renewal

The ongoing maintenance, rehabilitation, and renewal of drinking water systems and their components is required to ensure the continued provision of safe drinking water to the customer. Maintenance activities may be either preventative in nature, planned maintenance, or reactive, unplanned maintenance. Planned maintenance includes activities such flushing, valve inspection and maintenance, scheduled calibration of measurement and recording equipment, and routine inspection of equipment condition and operation during rounds at facilities. Unplanned maintenance includes activities such as broken water main and service leak repair, response to various equipment failures, and investigating customer complaints. Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 25 OF 28

Page 135 of 470

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Document No:

W-OP-03

Maintenance activities, whether planned or unplanned, are recorded in facility and system log books, work orders, service orders, and other applicable reports and forms. At least annually, and as described by the Infrastructure Maintenance Rehabilitation Renewal Procedure – W-G-08, these records including facility condition assessments, and the long term capital plan are reviewed to identify trends that could indicate the need for infrastructure rehabilitation or renewal.

Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring

Measuring and recording the various parameters used in process control and in the application of treatment chemicals and the sampling and testing of drinking water from various system locations is essential to the provision of quality drinking water to the customers of Utilities Kingston. This is a standalone system and no relevant sampling upstream of the system’s raw water intake is undertaken. The sampling, testing, and monitoring completed for the Sydenham Drinking Water System meets regulatory requirements. The Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring Procedure – W-G-09 describes the sampling, testing and monitoring activities undertaken by Utilities Kingston to ensure optimal drinking water treatment process control and the safety of the drinking water provided to our customers.

Measurement and Recording Equipment Calibration & Maintenance

Accuracy in measuring and recording the various parameters used in process control and in the application of treatment chemicals is essential to the provision of quality drinking water to the customers of Utilities Kingston. The Measurement and Recording Equipment Calibration and Maintenance Procedure – W-G-10 describes when and how the calibration of equipment used to make and record measurements critical to the operation of the drinking water system is completed and documented to ensure process efficiency and accuracy, and to meet and maintain regulatory requirements and internal water goals.

Emergency Management

The term ‘Emergency’ is typically used to describe a situation which requires immediate action to protect and preserve the health, safety and welfare of persons and limit or prevent damage and destruction of property, infrastructure and the environment. Drinking water emergencies are those situations that may result in the loss of the ability to maintain a supply of safe drinking water to the users of the drinking water system. A potential major drinking water emergency has the potential to adversely affect the supply of safe drinking water to a significant portion of the system or to critical facilities such as hospitals, nursing homes and medical clinics. A major drinking water emergency is adversely affecting or will adversely affect the supply of safe drinking water to a significant portion of the system or to critical facilities. The Emergency Response and Recovery Procedure – W-E-01 describes the general response and recovery processes to be followed when dealing with a drinking water emergency and evaluating the effectiveness of completed response and recovery operations. The procedure also identifies the requirements for and the processes used to identify potential future drinking water emergencies, develop contingencies to respond to potential emergencies, and evaluate the effectiveness of those contingencies. The Township of South Frontenac’s Emergency Response Plan identifies the members of the Community Control Group and outlines each member’s responsibilities. Specific to drinking water, the Public Works Manager and the Medical Officer of Health are responsible for ensuring the safety of drinking water. During a declared emergency, Utilities Kingston will keep the Community Control Group

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 26 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 136 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

apprised of the operational condition of the Sydenham Drinking Water System and the safety and security of the drinking water supplied by the system.

Internal Audits

Internal audits are conducted to evaluate conformity of the Quality Management System with the requirements of the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard. Internal audits must be completed at least once a calendar year. The Internal Audit Procedure – W-G-11 describes how internal audits are completed for each of the drinking water systems operated by Utilities Kingston.

Management Review

At least once a calendar year a management review committee is required to review the performance of the Drinking Water QMS and identify any deficiencies which require corrective action. The review is intended to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the Drinking Water QMS. The Management Review Procedure – W-G-12 describes how the review is to be completed and the results communicated. Best management practices published by the Ministry of Conservation and Parks will also be reviewed and considered during the Management Review.

Continual Improvement of the Quality Management System

Utilities Kingston will strive to continually improve the Quality Management System through the use of preventative actions to eliminate the cause of potential non-conformities and through corrective actions undertaken to address non-conformances identified through internal audits, and management reviews, and by implementing improvements identified and suggested by staff and management including best management practices.

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 27 OF 28

Utilities Kingston Drinking Water Quality Management System Document:

Operational Plan for the Sydenham Drinking Water System

Page 137 of 470 Document No:

W-OP-03

Appendix A – Schedule “C” Subject System Description Form

Version 8.0

Revised November 05, 2021

PAGE 28 OF 28

Page 138 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Corporate Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject: 2024 Budget

Summary

This report summarizes the 2024 Budget and requests adoption.

Recommendation

THAT Council approve and adopt the combined 2024 Capital and Operating budgets requiring $22,474,275 to be raised by taxation, as attached.

Background

The 2024 Budget was presented and discussed at the December 12th Council meeting. A few items were requested for follow-up and clarifications from staff which are summarized below. 2024 Budget The impact of the presented budget aligns with Council’s direction and amounts to a 2.74% or $47.04 impact on the average phased-in residential property of $278,126. The final budget represents $44,553,398 in reserve transfers, operating and capital expenditures and results in a total amount to be raised from taxation of $22,474,274. Attached as Appendix 1 is the final 2024 Budget updated from the December 12th meeting which also includes the capital budget and reserve schedule. The budget changed from what was previously circulated as there was an amendment to remove a levy of $6,173 for the inspection and maintenance costs that were being considered through Quinte Conservation Authority for 14 Island Lake Dam. Follow up data Requests from Budget Day With the use of Reserves to match the needs of the capital and operational budgets, Council requested a comparison of the reserves for the past few years. A historical comparison is shown in Attachment 2. Council also asked what the implication in the tax rate would be if we were not able to access these reserves which have built up over time. The 2024 tax rate will be 2.77% utilizing reserves but would require a 61.22% increase without reserves.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 139 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - 2024 Budget

Council also asked for a comparison of the Tax Rate changes over the past 5 years in comparison to the Consumer Price Index. The results are shown below:

South Frontenac Tax Rate Increments Compared to CPI

2019 over 2020 2021 over 2020 2022 over 2021 2023 over 2022 2024 over 2023

Tax Rate Changes 2.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.62% 2.74%

Consumer Price Index (As of OCT Prev to Budget) 3.70% 1.20% 4.70% 6.90% 3.10%

2.17%

3.92%

Average

Financial Implications The combined 2024 Capital and Operating budgets requires $22,474,274 to be raised by taxation. A separate by-law will be brought forward at a future meeting to authorize tax rates based on the approved budget.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. •

Priority: 3. Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world.

Attachments

2024 Final Budget
Reserves Historical Comparison

Approvals Submitted By:

Shelley Stedall, Dipl. B.Admin. AMCT Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 140 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - 2024 Budget

Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 141 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget High Level Summary of Changes Below is a high level summary of key changes from last year’s budget excluding transfers to Reserves, transfers to Capital and inter-departmental transfers. The listing below incorporates all items directed by Council, originally requested by staff and recommended by committees. Notable Variances in presented budget Costs Savings Hartington Parking Lot - Reduced Monitoring One Time Software Costs Hardware Replacements

-8,000 -11,500 -22,055

-41,555

Reduced Revenues OCIF

159,062

Increased Revenues OMPF AMP Revenues Bank Interest and Investment Interest Swim/Daycamp Fees * Planning Fees

-7,500 -15,500 -290,000 -94,300 -153,000

-560,300

Increased Costs Capital Taxation Requisition Current Year Asset Investment Reserve Impact (1% of current year levy) Conservation Authorities Insurance (4% overall) Pavement Marking Mowing Local Roads Recycling Collection Computer Maintenance Contracts Staff Complement Annual Adjustments

96,750 222,579 50,605 13,598 110,000 30,000 28,552 22,353 338,642

913,079

Public Services Reorganization Annualization Development Services Reorganization Annualization Human Resources Advisor (May - Dec) Remove P/T HR Asst Public Services LEO Facilities (May - Dec)

35,404 96,077 57,599 51,111

240,191

Enhanced Services included in Budget McMullen Beach - Swim/Daycamps - Net Fees and Student Costs * Summer Students (Swim/Daycamp) * By-law Enforcement Contract Parks - Tree Planting to replace dead Ash trees

0 95,500 7,100 20,000

122,600

Organizational Development Plan Assessment Growth = .99% or $219,472

Enhanced Services / Positions not in Budget LEO - Public Services (May - Dec) Fire Prevention Officer - Contract extension July - Dec. Arborist for Tree Removal Tub Grinder Contract Frontenac Arch Biosphere Request Previously Capital Transfer to Reserve - will now be allocated to identified projects Sidewalks Guiderails Streetlights

51,111 51,020 40,000 34,000 17,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 323,131

Total Increase to be raised by Taxation Assessment Growth

833,077 219,472

0.99%

Enhanced Services included in Budget - Self Funded or Funded from Reserves Building Inspector - Annualization 61,447 Utilities Kingston Fees 35,131 Compensation Review 35,000

131,578

Reduced Revenues included in Budget - Self Funded Sewage Permits No Longer Inspecting other Municipalities

135,000

Page 1 of 17

Page 142 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget High Level Summary of Changes

Council Direction - No specific target - but focus on priorities. Staff kept in mind the historical target of 2% along with known inflationary costs in the current economy. The proposed budget meets an overall 2.74% increase in the average taxpayer impact. This represents an overall $864,707 overall Township levy increase. Several expenses in comparing 2023 budget to forecasted 2024 expenses go beyond a 2% increase requiring changes to existing activities to meet this target. The capital budget, which was presented on November 21, 2023, includes total projected costs of $17,766,740 including a transfer to reserve for Road 38. The listing of projects including proposed funding is attached to this budget document.

Page 2 of 17

Page 143 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget Summary of Revenue and Expense

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

249,500

145,181

249,500

REVENUE

Property Taxation- Supplementary & PIL

User Charges

1,252,744

988,849

Licenses, Permits and Rents

1,702,635

1,330,532

Government Grants

3,185,516

Grants from Other Municipalities

495,252

Investment Income

359,000

Penalties and interest on taxes

370,000

Donations

Other

Variance $

0.00%

1,541,807

289,063

23.07%

1,560,838

-141,797

-8.33%

2,802,164

3,315,611

130,095

4.08%

495,000

-252

-0.05%

928,665

649,000

290,000

80.78%

336,280

370,000

0.00%

38,851

6,725

82,000

166,907

63,000

-19,000

-23.17%

Transfers From Reserves/Reserve Funds

8,069,584

13,827,642

5,558,058

68.88%

TOTAL Revenue

15,766,231

6,737,429

22,079,123

6,312,892

40.04%

6,404,592

5,334,078

10,334,761

3,930,168

61.36%

-118,908

-3.96%

OPERATING EXPENSE

General Government

Protection to Persons and Property

Fire

3,003,241

3,045,735

2,884,333

Police

2,865,302

2,652,577

2,873,290

7,988

0.28%

Conservation Authorities

271,271

296,557

521,876

250,605

92.38%

Protective Inspections and Control

133,173

124,327

148,753

15,579

11.70%

Emergency Measures

2,750

3,500

750

27.27%

Building Department

1,431,660

969,394

1,343,983

-87,677

-6.12%

Transportation Services Roadway Maintenance

14,746,726

10,444,491

16,184,205

1,437,479

9.75%

Winter Control

2,369,180

1,885,528

2,361,009

-8,171

-0.34%

Environmental Services

Water System

411,312

249,009

731,930

320,618

77.95%

Solid Waste Management

3,140,655

2,344,257

3,110,649

-30,007

-0.96%

Parks, Recreation and Cemeteries

1,659,707

2,482,002

3,032,146

1,372,439

82.69%

Planning and Development

967,858

748,614

1,022,964

55,106

5.69%

TOTAL Expense

37,407,428

30,576,616

44,553,398

7,145,970

19.10%

TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION

21,641,197

22,474,274

833,077

3.85%

IMPACT ON TAXPAYER: BASED ON AVERAGE PHASE-IN ASSESSMENT THE TOWNSHIP’S SHARE OF THE TAX BILL ON A 278,126 PROPERTY WILL INCREASE 2.74% WHICH EQUALS $47.04

Page 3 of 17

Page 144 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget General Government Detail

GENERAL MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY

Revenue

Taxation - Supplementary & PIL

Government Grants

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

249,500

145,181

249,500

0.00%

1,602,000

1,609,500

7,500

0.47%

Investment Income

345,000

911,161

635,000

290,000

84.06%

Penalties and interest on taxes

370,000

336,280

370,000

0.00%

Other

70,906

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

Total Revenue

0.00%

2,566,500

3,065,529

2,864,000

297,500

11.59%

0.00%

Transfer to Reserves

3,045,336

3,037,621

3,267,854

222,518

7.31%

Total Expense

3,045,336

3,037,621

3,267,854

222,518

7.31%

478,836

-27,907

403,854

-74,982

-15.66%

Expense
Operations
TOTAL GENERAL MUNCIPAL ACTIVITY
COUNCIL
Revenue
Grants from Other Municipalities

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

100,000

0.00%

Total Revenue

100,000

0.00%

185,763

162,941

197,398

11,635

6.26%

Expense
Remuneration
Benefits

6,423

6,313

7,685

1,262

19.65%

Memberships, Training and Travel

26,000

19,403

25,900

-100

-0.38%

Communications

15,900

13,081

18,900

3,000

18.87%

Council Operations

130,555

20,372

134,693

4,138

3.17%

Grants * (see details bottom of next page)

229,109

200,948

229,109

0.00%

320

0.00%

Transfer to Capital
Transfer to Reserves

10,000

0.00%

Total Expense

603,750

433,379

623,685

19,935

3.30%

TOTAL COUNCIL

503,750

433,379

523,685

19,935

3.96%

User Charges

-400

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

0.00%

Total Revenue

-400

100.00%

Remuneration

0.00%

Benefits

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

0.00%

ELECTIONS 32 Revenue
Expense
Communications

0.00%

Elections Operations

0.00%

Transfer to Reserves

25,000

0.00%

Total Expense

25,000

0.00%

TOTAL ELECTIONS

25,000

25,400

25,000

0.00%

Page 4 of 17

Page 145 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget General Government Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

CORPORATE SERVICES
Revenue
User Charges

40,100

19,794

40,500

400

1.00%

Licenses, Permits and Rents

1,800

1,364

1,800

0.00%

Government Grants

80,000

100.00%

3,000

8,906

3,000

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

145,000

504,230

359,230

247.74%

Total Revenue

189,900

30,063

629,530

439,630

231.51%

1,144,507

1,008,540

1,218,804

74,297

6.49%

387,040

322,930

432,609

45,569

11.77%

0.00%

59,804

18,836

78,177

18,373

30.72%

Communications

54,678

50,759

56,178

1,500

2.74%

Professional and Consulting Fees

44,267

8,328

82,000

37,733

85.24%

Administrative Operations

225,652

239,155

204,057

-21,595

-9.57%

Other
Expense
Remuneration
Benefits
Inter Departmental Transfer
Memberships, Training and Travel
Transfer to Capital

145,000

458

538,190

393,190

271.17%

Total Expense

2,060,948

1,649,006

2,610,015

549,067

26.64%

TOTAL CORPORATE SERVICES

1,871,048

1,618,943

1,980,485

109,437

5.85%

Facilities Revenue

223,135

166,402

224,375

1,240

0.56%

Government Grants

0.00%

ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
Revenue

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves
Donations

360,000

3,500,000

3,140,000

872.22%

Total Revenue

583,135

166,402

3,724,375

3,141,240

538.68%

7,088

0.00%

1,291

2,971

1,291

0.00%

Expense
Remuneration
Inter Departmental Transfer
Professional and Consulting Fees

5,610

4,366

6,920

1,310

23.35%

Facilities Operating Costs

198,027

123,625

182,422

-15,605

-7.88%

Transfer to Capital

360,000

46,021

3,500,000

3,140,000

872.22%

Transfer to Reserves

104,631

5,000

117,574

12,943

12.37%

Total Expense

669,558

189,072

3,808,207

3,138,649

468.76%

TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES

86,423

22,669

83,832

-2,592

-3.00%

2,965,057

2,072,484

3,016,856

51,798

1.75%

Total General Government Explanation of Significant Variances

Line 4

OMPF confirmed Funding

Line 5

Investment Bank Interest

Line 12

In year Asset Investment Reserve (AIR) contribution

Line 54/55

Human Resource Advisor/ Annualization of Deputy Clerk

Line 59

Compensation Review

Line 76

Admnistration Offices Construction

Council - Grants to Organizations/Individuals (line 26) Private Lanes

100,000

Bradshaw School Visits

2,000

South Frontenac Community Services (SFCS)

20,200

Inverary Youth

1,650

Community Grants

35,000

High School - Graduation

Seniors & Law Enforcement Together (SALT)

7,500

Trails - Work in kind - CRCA

5,219

Lake Study Grants

30,000

Heritage Committee Grant

15,000

Non-Township Facilities (Verona Mini-Park/ Lion’s Hall)

7,040

Miscellaneous

5,000

Total

500

229,109

Page 5 of 17

Page 146 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTEN NAC 2024 Final Budget Protection to Persons and Property Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

FIRE

Revenue

User Charges

Grants from Other Municipalities

0.00%

Other

28,943

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

Total Revenue

56,000

19,999

55,750

-250

-0.45%

950,500

865,021

-85,479

-8.99%

1,006,500

48,942

920,771

-85,729

-8.52%

749,790

576,377

811,005

61,215

8.16%

Benefits

143,306

130,078

173,720

30,414

21.22%

Memberships, Training and Travel

30,750

14,698

30,750

0.00%

Communications & Public Education

70,174

56,693

69,900

-274

-0.39%

Professional and Consulting Fees

6,250

3,196

6,250

0.00%

Fire Operations

336,329

367,710

347,458

11,129

3.31%

Transfer to Capital

1,005,500

1,246,553

784,000

-221,500

-22.03%

Transfer to Reserves

452,182

466,684

452,182

0.00%

Total Expense

2,794,281

2,861,989

2,675,265

-119,016

-4.26%

TOTAL FIRE

1,787,781

2,813,047

1,754,494

-33,287

-1.86%

Facilities Operating Costs

198,280

173,286

198,608

328

0.17%

Total Expense

198,280

173,286

198,608

328

0.17%

TOTAL FIRE FACILITIES

198,280

173,286

198,608

328

0.17%

Expense

Remuneration

FIRE FACILITIES
Expense
911 SERVICE
Expense
911 Operations

10,680

10,460

-220

-2.06%

Total Expense

10,680

10,460

-220

-2.06%

TOTAL 911 SERVICE

10,680

10,460

-220

-2.06%

1,996,741

2,996,793

1,963,562

-33,179

-1.66%

TOTAL FIRE

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 9/12

VFF Wage Adjustment/ FPO 6 Months

Line 14

Insurance, Vehicle Maintenace

Page 6 of 17

Page 147 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONT TENAC 2024 Final Budget Protection to Persons and Property Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

POLICE

Revenue

User Charges

8,000

15,469

8,000

0.00%

Government Grants

9,300

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

Total Revenue

Expense

Remuneration

Memberships, Training and Travel

0.00%

17,300

15,469

17,300

0.00%

1,350

1,250

1,350

0.00%

900

811

1,200

300

33.33%

Communications

1,214

1,044

1,214

0.00%

Police Operations

2,852,998

2,647,403

2,860,686

7,688

0.27%

Total Expense

2,856,462

2,650,508

2,864,450

7,988

0.28%

TOTAL POLICE

2,839,162

2,635,040

2,847,150

7,988

0.28%

Government Grants

8,840

0.00%

Total Revenue

8,840

0.00%

Ride Operations

8,840

2,068

8,840

0.00%

Total Expense

8,840

2,068

8,840

0.00%

2,068

100.00%

2,839,162

2,637,108

2,847,150

7,988

0.28%

Transfer from Reserves

200,000

100.00%

Total Revenue

200,000

100.00%

RIDE PROGRAM
Revenue
Expense
TOTAL RIDE PROGRAM
Total Police
CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES
Revenues
Expense 2,000

1,900

2,000

0.00%

269,271

294,657

319,876

50,605

18.79%

200,000

100.00%

Total Expense

271,271

296,557

521,876

50,605

18.65%

TOTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES

271,271

296,557

321,876

50,605

18.65%

Remuneration
Conservation Authority Transfers
Transfer to Capital

Explanation of Significant Variances

Line 26

Conservation Authorities increases Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority $8,985 or 5.61 increase Quinte Conservation $47,009 or 49% increase. Rideau Valley Conservation Authority $784 or 2.93% increase

Page 7 of 17

Page 148 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONT TENAC 2024 Final Budget Protection to Persons and Property Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS AND CONTROL

Revenue

User Charges

10,500

29,700

24,000

13,500

128.57%

Licenses, Permits and Rents

47,000

37,710

42,000

-5,000

-10.64%

Government Grants

9,000

7,880

9,000

0.00%

Other

0.00%

Total Revenue

66,500

75,290

75,000

8,500

12.78%

Expense

Inter Departmental Transfer

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

13,000

10,245

15,500

2,500

19.23%

Communications

2,100

521

2,100

0.00%

Professional and Consulting Fees

18,000

41,073

23,000

5,000

27.78%

Protective Operations

100,073

72,488

108,153

8,079

8.07%

Transfer to Reserves

0.00%

Total Expense

133,173

124,327

148,753

15,579

11.70%

TOTAL PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS AND CONTROL

66,673

49,037

73,753

7,079

10.62%

Transfer from Reserves

0.00%

Total Revenue

100.00%

Remuneration

500

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

250

1,000

750

300.00%

1,500

1,000

-500

-33.33%

500

1,000

500

100.00%

Total Expense

2,750

3,500

750

27.27%

TOTAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

2,750

3,500

750

27.27%

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Revenue
Expense
Communications
Emg Management Operations

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 3

Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMP’s)

Line 12

By-law Legal

Line 13

By-law Enforcement Contract

Page 8 of 17

Page 149 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTE ENAC 2024 Final Budget Protection to Persons and Property Detail

BUILDING

Revenue

User Charges

Licenses, Permits and Rents

Government Grants

Other

Transfer from Reserves Total Revenue

Expense

Remuneration

Benefits

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

19,500

7,801

19,500

0.00%

1,315,600

1,052,209

1,181,183

-134,417

-10.22%

0.00%

13,200

0.00%

45,000

90,600

45,600

101.33%

1,380,100

1,073,209

1,291,283

-88,817

-6.44%

739,343

601,103

788,377

49,034

6.63%

277,557

209,640

273,614

-3,944

-1.42%

0.00%

31,300

27,294

31,300

0.00%

Communications

6,639

4,637

6,639

0.00%

Professional and Consulting Fees

10,000

3,618

10,000

0.00%

Building Operations

97,377

78,509

91,354

-6,023

-6.19%

Transfer to Capital

45,000

50,000

5,000

11.11%

Inter Departmental Transfer
Memberships, Training and Travel

172,884

40,000

-132,884

-76.86%

1,380,100

964,801

1,291,283

-88,817

-6.44%

-108,408

-69.37%

User Charges

10,000

5,150

10,000

0.00%

Total Revenue

10,000

5,150

10,000

0.00%

Remuneration

2,401

0.00%

Benefits

0.00%

Civic Numbers Operations

51,560

2,192

52,700

1,140

2.21%

Total Expense

51,560

4,593

52,700

1,140

2.21%

TOTAL CIVIC NUMBERS

41,560

-557

42,700

1,140

2.74%

TOTAL BUILDING

41,560

-108,965

42,700

1,140

2.74%

5,218,157

5,870,577

5,252,540

34,383

0.66%

Transfer to Reserves
Total Expense
TOTAL BUILDING
CIVIC NUMBERS
Revenue
Expense
Total Protection to Persons and Property Detail

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 4

Part 8 - NF/CF/FI - Contract ended 2023

Line 9/10

New Building Inspector Annualization

Page 9 of 17

Page 150 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget Transportation Services Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

ROADS

Revenue

User Charges

8,500

7,600

8,500

0.00%

Licenses, Permits and Rents

99,500

60,348

99,500

0.00%

Government Grants

1,060,414

883,678

901,352

-159,062

-15.00%

Grants from Other Municipalities Other

495,252 76,500

0 44,953

495,000 60,000

-252 -16,500

-0.05% -21.57%

Transfer from Reserve

5,690,684

6,702,948

1,012,264

17.79%

Total Revenue

7,430,850

996,579

8,267,300

836,450

11.26%

1,634,293

1,601,700

1,724,297

90,004

5.51% 5.04%

Expense

Remuneration

Benefits

606,923

803,994

637,485

30,562

Inter Departmental Transfer

-779,726

-641,637

-799,178

-19,453

2.49%

Memberships, Training and Travel

43,070

45,131

39,464

-3,606

-8.37%

Communications

55,657

33,023

58,502

2,845

5.11%

Professional and Consulting Fees

33,070

15,700

38,542

5,472

16.55%

Roads Operations * (see details below)

3,011,589

2,626,321

3,252,925

241,336

8.01%

Transfer to Capital

9,541,850

5,276,754

10,628,050

1,086,200

11.38%

Transfer to Reserves

600,000

683,509

604,118

4,118

0.69%

Total Expense

14,746,726

10,444,493

16,184,205

1,437,479

9.75%

TOTAL ROADS

7,315,876

9,447,915

7,916,905

601,029

8.22%

WINTER CONTROL

Expense

Remuneration

516,309

288,215

567,561

51,252

9.93%

Benefits

184,381

199,706

15,325

8.31%

Inter Departmental Transfer

662,958

594,804

622,009

-40,949

-6.18%

Winter Control Operations

1,005,532

1,002,509

971,733

-33,799

-3.36%

Transfer to Capital

0.00%

Total Expense

2,369,180

1,885,528

2,361,009

-8,171

-0.34%

TOTAL WINTER CONTROL

2,369,180

1,885,528

2,361,009

-8,171

-0.34%

Total Transportation Services

9,685,056

11,333,443

10,277,914

592,858

6.12%

*Roads Operations Breakdown (line 16)

2023-2024 Budget

YTD Actual 2023 Budget $

27-Nov-23 $

2024 Budget $

Variance $

Maintenance - Structures

19,518

14,915

20,018

501

2.57%

Roadside Maintenance

416,993

292,081

497,356

80,363

19.27%

Hardtop Maintenance

459,873

418,321

471,855

11,982

2.61%

Loose Top Maintenance

326,442

322,118

334,071

7,629

2.34%

Safety Devices

338,165

389,508

478,419

140,254

41.48%

Street Lights

43,985

37,066

47,500

3,515

7.99%

Overhead

1,406,614

1,152,311

1,403,705

-2,909

-0.21%

TOTAL ROADS MAINTENANCE

3,011,589

2,626,321

3,252,925

241,335

8.01%

Explanation of Significant Variances

Line 5

OCIF Funding Confirmed and is was reduced by 15% - $159,062

Line 8

CCBF (former Gas Tax) not yet confirmed

Line 10/11

PS Operations Additional PT and annualization of positions

Line 29

5 year average + 2%

Page 10 of 17

Page 151 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONT TENAC 2024 Final Budget Environmental Services Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

408,912

287,778

417,030

8,118

1.99%

2,400

2,200

2,400

0.00%

Variance $

WATER SYSTEM

Revenue

User Charges

Licenses, Permits and Rents

Government Grants

11,385

201,657

100.00%

Other

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

110,843

100.00%

Total Revenue

411,312

301,363

731,930

320,618

77.95%

Expense

Remuneration

Inter Departmental Transfer

Communications

0.00%

704

0.00%

5,450

2,949

5,600

150

2.75%

Professional and Consulting Fees

158,569

174,051

193,700

35,131

22.15%

Water System Operations

91,454

74,553

92,845

1,391

1.52%

Transfer to Reserves

155,135

126,582

-28,553

-18.41%

Transfer to Capital

-2,543

312,500

Total Expense

411,312

249,009

731,930

8,118

1.97%

TOTAL WATER SYSTEM

-52,354

0.00%

SOLID WASTE AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

Revenue

User Charges

401,382

284,490

420,377

18,995

4.73%

Government Grants

487,962

246,991

487,962

0.00%

115,000

-115,000

-100.00%

1,004,344

531,481

908,339

-96,005

-9.56%

Remuneration

375,660

378,335

396,163

20,503

5.46%

Benefits

127,740

65,343

127,506

-234

-0.18%

Inter Departmental Transfer

132,606

131,692

132,606

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

3,178

1,526

3,925

747

23.51%

Communications

15,832

9,687

13,056

-2,776

-17.53%

Professional and Consulting Fees

91,100

61,770

96,000

4,900

5.38%

Solid Waste Management Operations

2,239,540

1,810,107

2,301,393

61,853

2.76%

Transfer to Capital

115,000

-219,794

-115,000

-100.00%

Transfer to Reserves

40,000

105,591

40,000

0.00%

Total Expense

3,140,655

2,344,257

3,110,649

-30,007

-0.96%

TOTAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

2,136,312

1,812,777

2,202,310

65,998

3.09%

Total Environmental Services

2,136,312

1,760,423

2,202,310

65,998

3.09%

Other

Transfer from Reserves

Total Revenue

Expense

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 5

Green Funding (ICIP) for SCADA

Line 13

Utilities Kingston Fees

Line 21

Tipping Fees/ Bagtag Revenue

Line 33

Garbage/Recycling contracts

Page 11 of 17

Page 152 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget Parks, Recreation and Cemeteries Detail

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS

Revenue

User Charges

71,650

143,546

165,950

94,300

131.61%

Government Grants

8,000

0.00%

Donations

28,851

6,725

100.00%

Other

2,500

-2,500

-100.00%

Transfers From Reserves/Reserve Funds

70,000

30,000

-40,000

-57.14%

Total Revenue

152,150

180,397

210,675

58,525

38.47%

Expense

Remuneration

247,492

231,268

413,160

165,668

66.94%

Benefits

50,855

76,100

83,718

32,862

64.62%

Inter Departmental Transfer

2,582

131

2,582

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

17,050

7,955

17,850

800

4.69%

Communications

27,600

27,602

29,785

2,185

7.92%

Professional and Consulting Fees

Parks and Recreation Programs - Operations

Grants

200

234

300

100

0.00%

157,926

184,939

180,661

22,735

14.40%

0.00%

70,000

43,656

30,000

-40,000

-57.14%

7,715

0.00%

Transfer to Capital

Transfer to Reserves

Total Expense

573,705

579,601

758,055

184,350

32.13%

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS

421,555

399,204

547,380

125,825

29.85%

PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES

BUILDINGS

Revenue

User Charges

1,000

0.00%

Licenses, Permits and Rents

13,200

10,015

9,310

-3,890

-29.47%

Government Grants

42,231

0.00%

Grants from Other Municipalities

0.00%

Donations/Contributions

100.00%

Transfer from Reserves

215,000

455,000

240,000

111.63%

Total Revenue

229,200

52,246

465,310

236,110

103.01%

Expense

Remuneration

48,270

0.00%

Benefits

0.00%

9,504

15,582

9,504

0.00%

835

685

900

7.78%

Inter Departmental Transfer

Communications

Professional and Consulting Fees

Building Operations

5,090

3,054

8,365

3,275

64.34%

196,693

156,121

234,161

37,468

19.05%

Transfer to Capital

98,000

144,771

464,000

366,000

373.47%

Total Expense

310,123

368,482

716,931

406,808

131.18%

TOTAL BUILDINGS

80,923

316,236

251,621

170,698

210.94%

Page 12 of 17

Page 153 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget Parks, Recreation and Cemeteries Detail

PARKS

Revenue

User Charges

Licenses, Permits and Rents

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

2,000

2,946

3,000

1,000

50.00%

284

270

100.00%

Government Grants

0.00%

Donations/Contributions

10,000

0.00%

Other

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

148,500

1,124,000

975,500

656.90%

Total Revenue

150,500

13,231

1,127,270

976,770

649.02%

Expense 11,000

50,856

843

-10,157

-92.33%

308

323

100.00%

29,883

43,335

29,883

0.00%

Remuneration

Benefits

Inter Departmental Transfer

Professional and Consulting Fees

4,285

1,637

5,500

1,215

28.35%

Parks Operations

149,896

126,165

193,016

43,120

28.77%

Transfer to Capital

368,500

1,088,448

1,115,000

746,500

202.58%

Total Expense

563,564

1,310,749

1,344,566

781,002

138.58%

TOTAL PARKS

413,064

1,297,519

217,296

-195,768

-47.39%

ARENA

Revenue

User Charges

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

100.00%

Total Revenue

100.00%

Expense

Remuneration

200

250

100.00%

141,381

140,985

-396

-0.28%

0.00%

Transfer to Others

Transfer to Reserves

Total Expense

141,381

141,581

141,235

-146

-0.10%

TOTAL ARENA

141,381

141,581

141,235

-146

-0.10%

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES

635,368

1,755,336

610,152

-25,216

-3.97%

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION

1,056,923

2,154,540

1,157,531

100,608

9.52%

CEMETERIES

Revenue

User Charges

40,200

18,308

40,200

0.00%

Investment Income

14,000

17,503

14,000

0.00%

Donations

100.00%

Transfer From Reserves

Total Revenue

Expense

Cemetery Operations

Transfer to Capital

100.00%

54,200

35,811

54,200

0.00%

70,934

81,589

71,360

426

0.60%

100.00% 100.00%

Transfer to Reserves

Total Expense

70,934

81,589

71,360

426

0.60%

TOTAL CEMETERIES

16,734

45,778

17,160

426

2.54%

Total Parks, Recreation and Cemeteries

1,073,657

2,200,318

1,174,691

101,034

9.41%

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 3

Swim/ Daycamp Program Fees

Line 10/11

Recreation Program Staffing/ LEO Facilities

Line 16

Swim /Day Camp and Events

Line 38

Recreation Facilities Maintenance and Insurance

Line 56

Parks Maintnance/ Tree Planting in Parks

Page 13 of 17

Page 154 of 470

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC 2024 Final Budget Development Services

Development Services

Revenue

Actuals

2023-2024 Budget

2023 Budget

27-Nov-23

2024 Budget

Variance $

User Charges

175,000

146,669

328,000

153,000

87.43%

Government Grants

0.00%

Grants from Other Municipalities

0.00%

Transfer from Reserves

229,900

145,000

-84,900

-36.93%

Total Revenue

404,900

146,669

473,000

68,100

16.82%

Expense

Remuneration

448,925

376,967

530,011

81,086

18.06%

Benefits

151,753

123,478

177,292

25,539

16.83%

Inter Departmental Transfer

0.00%

Memberships, Training and Travel

30,000

13,555

49,400

19,400

64.67%

Communications

7,445

8,116

8,315

870

11.68%

Professional and Consulting Fees

37,200

4,624

37,200

0.00%

Operations

62,634

50,358

75,746

13,111

20.93%

Transfer to Capital

229,900

171,515

145,000

-84,900

-36.93%

Transfer to Reserves

0.00%

Total Expense

967,858

748,614

1,022,964

55,106

5.69%

TOTAL Planning and Development

562,958

601,945

549,964

-12,994

-2.31%

Explanation of Significant Variances Line 3

Revised Planning Fees - 2023

Line 9-10

Annualized cost for Development Services Positions

Line 12

Committee of Adjustment Mileage

Line 15

Computer Replacements

Page 14 of 17

Page 1 of 2 2023-12-05

Township of South Frontenac 2024 Capital Budget with Financing

Detailed Project # Project * Sheet page # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

22-02 23-12 24-01 24-03 24-04 24-05

24-11 24-12 24-13 24-14 24-15 24-16 24-17 24-18

24-21 24-22 24-23 24-24 24-25 24-26

21-R09 24-31 24-32 24-33 24-34 24-35 24-36 24-37 24-38 24-39 24-43 24-40 22-17 24-44 24-45 24-46 23-49 24-41 24-47 23-51

22-53 24-61

CORPORATE SERVICES Gateway Signage (2022-2025 Project) Wayfinding Sign Fabrication and Installation (2022-2025 Project) Website Redesign Cloud Server Records Management 14 Island Lake Dam Refurbishment subtotal FIRE Hoses and Appliances Electric Portable Fans Vehicle Replacement - Deputy Fire Chief Pumper Replacement Gas Detectors & Docking Stations Mobile Gear Racks - Station 5 & 7 Specialized Equipment for Squads Radio Communications Study subtotal PUBLIC SERVICES FLEET Tandem Plow Truck Tandem Roller-Pro Truck Two (2) 1-Ton Trucks with plow and sander attachments 1-Ton Truck with Dump Box and power lift Front Broom Attachment AVL - Light Duty Installs subtotal ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE Arterial Reserve (Road 38 - Reserve Transfer) Perth Road Reconstruction (at Loughborough Lake) Microsurfacing - Bellrock Road Orser Road Spooner Road Bedford Road Ormsbee Road Greenfield Road Kerr Road Tom Watson Road Devil Lake Road Surface Treatment (LCB) Preservation 12th Con Bridge (B32) Repair Sydenham Lake Bridge and Dam Bracken Culvert (Yarker Road) Long Swamp Bridge Study Transportation Master Plan Pre-Engineering Roads 2025 Road 38 Detailed Design Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain subtotal SYDENHAM WATER SCADA Software Upgrade Sydenham Drinking Water System Upgrades subtotal FACILITIES

2024 Budget

Tax)

53,333 266,667 33,190 85,000 100,000 200,000 738,190 18,000 30,000 75,000 550,000 40,000 18,000 20,000 10,000 761,000

430,000 625,000 230,000 120,000 40,000 20,000 1,465,000 2,450,000 520,000 495,000 157,500 64,100 1,432,000 819,100 215,900 161,500 124,400 346,600 900,000 38,500 534,000 527,200 35,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 18,750 9,089,550 275,000 37,500 312,500

24-02

Town Hall Expansion

3,500,000

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

24-51 24-52 24-54 24-55 24-56 24-57 24-58 24-59 24-82 24-83

Storrington Centre Roof and Parking Lot Upgrades Bedford Garage Equipment Upgrades Keeley Patrol Yard Waste Oil Disposal Sydenham Point Accessible Washroom Upgrades Centennial Park New Accessible Washrooms Design and Build Centennial Park Renovations to existing Canteen/Washrooms Harris Park Hall Flooring Replacement Glendower Hall Interior Design Plans Station 5 Exterior Upgrades Station 4 Flooring subtotal RECREATION Sydenham Point Field Score clock Power Centennial Park Walkway Connections Centennial Park Courts and Electrical Improvements McMullen Park - Parking Lot paving & storage bunker McMullen Park Beach and Washroom Building Upgrades Keeley/Bowes Diamond Upgrades Glendower Court Basketball nets Bellrock & Petworth Parkette Conceptual Design

435,000 48,500 25,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 29,000 20,000 15,000 8,000 4,290,500

24-60 24-66 24-80 24-67 24-75 24-68 24-69 24-70

10,000 240,000 49,000 46,000 16,000 208,000 11,000 15,000

Working Funds

Asset Invesment Reserve

53,333 186,667 33,190 85,000 100,000 200,000 658,190

Infrastructure

Fire Equipment

Facilities

Public Services Building Landfill Climate Change Building Equipment Equipment Closure Reserve

Sydenham Water Reserve

OPP Reserve

Wages-Fire Department (Stabilization)

Taxation

Other

Notes

Red Grant Program - 186k *3 + 80k * 3 grant =

80,000

10,000 10,000

761,000

40,000 20,000 60,000

1,465,000

18,000 30,000 75,000 550,000 40,000 18,000 20,000 0

751,000

430,000 625,000 230,000 120,000

1,405,000

2,450,000 495,000

25,000 495,000

157,500 64,100 500,000

County FGT

530,648

401,352 OCIF

819,100 215,900 161,500 124,400 346,600 400,000 38,500 179,500

500,000 OCIF 354,500

527,200 35,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 2,056,300

1,530,000

1,248,000

485,000

2,765,000

885,148

201,658

312,500

4,290,500

73,343 37,500 110,843

18,750 2,468,750

901,352

9,089,550

201,658 ICIP Grant Funding

250,000 435,000 48,500 25,000 30,000

30,000 150,000 29,000 20,000

50,000

485,000

2,765,000

15,000 8,000 990,500

10000 240,000 49,000 46000 16,000 208,000 11000 15,000

Page 15 of 17

Page 155 of 470

61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

Community Building Development Fund (formerly Federal Gas Parkland Charges

Page 2 of 2 2023-12-05

Township of South Frontenac 2024 Capital Budget with Financing

Detailed Project # Project * Sheet page # 70 71 72 73 74 75 76

24-71 24-72 24-74

24-76 24-77 24-78

Petworth Mill wall cap and repairs Shipyards Boat Ramp Rehabilitation New Picnic Tables subtotal DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Economic Development Strategy Replacement Building Vehicle Development Charge Study and Population Study subtotal Total

2024 Budget

Community Building Development Fund (formerly Federal Gas Parkland Charges Tax)

200,000 110,000 10,000 915,000 50,000 50,000 95,000 195,000 17,766,740

448,000

200,000 110,000 10,000 467,000

Working Funds

Asset Invesment Reserve

Infrastructure

Fire Equipment

Facilities

Sydenham Water Reserve

OPP Reserve

0 110,843

Public Services Building Landfill Climate Change Building Equipment Equipment Closure Reserve

Wages-Fire Department (Stabilization)

Taxation

Other

Notes

915,000

0 2,538,750

0 1,183,010

195,000 17,766,740

50,000 50,000 95,000 95,000 2,649,300

0 1,530,000

0 467,000

50,000 1,193,190

0 4,013,000

0 885,148

0 990,500

0 751,000

0 1,405,000

50,000 50,000

0

Page 156 of 470

Page 16 of 17

Page 157 of 470 RESERVES & RESERVE FUNDS FORECAST - 2024 Final Budget PROJECTED BALANCE

Contribution to Reserve in PROJECTED BALANCE 2024 Budget

2024 Budgeted Expenditures

END OF CAPITAL REVENUE YEAR -2023 FUND FUND RESERVES & RESERVE FUNDS FORECAST - 2024 Budget Final Fiscal Working Funds 2,590,558 1,193,190 146,040 COVID/ Safe Restart 209,515 Council - Accessibiilty 10,000 Equipment and Infrastructure General Asset Investment Reserve 1,789,772 4,013,000 Infrastructure 613,023 885,148 Climate Change 0 Vertical Facilities/Property 888,121 990,500 Recreation 12,813 Rolling Capital - Building Department 26,741 50,000 Capital - Fire Department 547,546 751,000 Capital - Roads Department 857,633 1,405,000 Capital - Solid Waste Dept 51,000 Linear Cemetery Lot Addition 43,538 Roads - Const/Imp 1,920,000 Stabilization Wages-Fire Department 212,641 91,021 Building Department 1,824,955 40,000 Part 8 Septic 0 Policing Costs 740,880 Winter Control - Roads Dept. 819,847 Recycling 273,641 Planning 66,784 Revenue-Severance Appl. 20,000 Water Reserve Fund 1,562,158 110,843 Sub-total 15,086,165 9,398,681 277,061 OBLIGATORY RESERVE FUNDS 5% Parkland 284,218 467,000 Development Charges 2,790,741 2,649,300 Environmental Enhancement 150,919 1,017,645 Community Building Fund (formerly Federal Gas Tax) Subdivider Contributions 37,171 796,527 Ontario Community Infrastruct Cannabis Legalization Fund-O 42,740 Sub-total 5,119,960 RESERVE FUNDS & TRUSTS Election 55,429 927,391 Highway #38 Reconstruction Landfill Closure 379,797 0 Trusts Fire Donations 22,029 Portland Historical 28,001 Grant Memorial 27,526 OHRP 4,175 Cemetery - PC 565,671 Cemetery M. Burns Trust 25,000 Cemetery - Monument PC 77,758 Cemetery - Monument PC Inc 31,542 Sub-total 2,144,319 22,350,444 TOTAL

TAXATION BDGTD

OTHER REVENUES

473,320

END OF YEAR -2024

10,000

1,724,648 209,515 20,000

2,329,595 275,000

106,367 2,875 0 92,621 12,813 0 16,741 248,728 56,751 51,000 0 43,538 4,370,000

195,000

40,000 452,182 604,118

2,450,000

112,574

6,941,789

121,620 1,784,955 0 853,454 819,847 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,451,315 12,352,212

350,000 1,342,110

167,218 1,483,551 150,919

1,530,000

1,112,072

599,717

1,697,879

901,352

6,344,179

3,705,534

37,171 0 42,740 2,481,315

0 3,705,534

80,429 927,391 419,797 0 22,029 28,001 27,526 4,175 565,671 25,000 77,758 31,542 2,209,319 17,042,846

25,000 40,000

0 15,742,860

0 277,061

65,000 7,006,789

Page 17 of 17

Page Page 1 of 2158 of 470

Attachment 2

RESERVES & RESERVE FUNDS FORECAST - 2024 Budget BALANCE 2019 YE Balance (F/S)

Fiscal Working Funds* COVID/ Safe Restart Council - Accessibiilty Equipment and Infrastructure General Asset Investment Reserve Infrastructure Vertical Facilities/Property Recreation Rolling Capital - Building Department Capital - Fire Department Capital - Roads Department Capital - Solid Waste Dept Linear Cemetery Lot Addition Roads - Const/Imp Stabilization Wages-Fire Department Building Department** Policing Costs Winter Control - Roads Dept. Recycling Planning Revenue-Severance Appl. Water Reserve Fund Sub-total OBLIGATORY RESERVE FUNDS 5% Parkland Development Charges Environmental Enhancement Community Building Fund (formerly Federal Gas Tax) Subdivider Contributions Ontario Community Infrastructure (OCIF) Cannabis Legalization Fund-OCLIF Sub-total RESERVE FUNDS & TRUSTS Election Highway #38 Reconstruction Landfill Closure Trusts Fire Donations Portland Historical Grant Memorial OHRP Cemetery - PC Cemetery M. Burns Trust Cemetery - Monument PC Cemetery - Monument PC Inc Sub-total TOTAL

Includes Climate Change ** Includes Part 8 Septic

PROJECTED BALANCE PROJECTED BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE END OF YEAR - BALANCE END 2020 YE 2021 YE 2022 YE 2023 (Budget + OF YEAR -2024 Balance (F/S) Balance (F/S) Balance (F/S) Actuals) (Budget)

6,432,386 0

5,871,207 0

3,002,212 351,592

5,071,366 219,515

2,590,558 209,515 10,000

1,724,648 209,515 20,000

3,643,788 2,488,608

4,476,658 2,279,021

5,186,132 2,396,403

3,213,153 2,051,620

1,789,772 613,023

1,177,570 12,813

1,246,512 12,813

1,357,302 12,813

1,413,753 12,813

888,121 12,813

79,125 900,778 871,810 51,000

7,603 825,451 1,179,742 51,000

1,741 1,202,874 1,702,765 51,000

41,741 875,285 1,765,662 51,000

26,741 547,546 857,633 51,000

43,538 0

43,538 700,000

43,538 1,100,000

43,538 1,650,000

43,538 1,920,000

106,367 2,875 0 92,621 12,813 0 16,741 248,728 56,751 51,000 0 43,538 4,370,000

133,693 906,863 728,249 0 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,026,014 18,856,660

269,797 895,589 683,249 390,021 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,243,116 20,535,740

311,188 1,142,269 648,249 1,130,688 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,301,496 21,302,687

344,477 1,747,071 648,249 819,847 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,442,731 21,772,245

212,641 1,824,955 740,880 819,847 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,562,158 15,081,165

121,620 1,784,955 853,454 819,847 273,641 66,784 20,000 1,451,315 12,347,212

248,262 2,701,141 144,168

199,777 2,789,371 147,169

247,820 2,907,788 150,919

170,112 3,180,461 150,919

284,218 2,790,741 150,919

167,218 1,483,551 150,919

1,359,796

1,157,995

1,828,086

2,630,894

1,017,645

599,717

37,171 0 37,109 4,527,647

37,171 0 37,533 4,369,016

37,171 0 42,740 5,214,523

37,171 796,527 42,740 7,008,823

37,171 796,527 42,740 5,119,960

37,171 0 42,740 2,481,315

31,739 839,249 426,307

57,389 892,623 500,956

82,841 927,391 564,797

30,429 927,391 562,267

18,252 14,970 26,406 4,175 512,901 25,000 68,108 25,878 1,992,985 25,377,292

19,013 19,877 26,736 4,175 525,151 25,000 70,558 27,754 2,169,232 27,073,988

21,386 27,547 26,940 4,175 549,705 25,000 73,058 29,237 2,332,077 28,849,287

22,029 28,001 27,526 4,175 565,671 25,000 77,758 31,542 2,301,789 31,082,857

55,429 927,391 379,797 0 22,029 28,001 27,526 4,175 565,671 25,000 77,758 31,542 2,144,319 22,350,444

80,429 927,391 419,797 0 22,029 28,001 27,526 4,175 565,671 25,000 77,758 31,542 2,209,319 17,042,846

Page Page 2 of 2159 of 470

Attachment 2

Reserve History and Projections 2019 - 2024 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 2019

2020

Reserves

Obligatory Reserve Funds

22,474,275

Tax Rate Increase 2.74%

12,792,042 35,266,317

61.22%

2024 Tax Impact if not funded from Reserves Net Levy to be funded Taxation Total Funding from Reserves for Operations & Capital (Excludes OCIF & CCBF) Total Required to be Raised if no Reserves

2021

2022

Projected 2023

Projected 2024

Reserve Funds & Trusts

Page 160 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Corporate Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject: Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) Report

Summary This report provides a summary of recent changes to reporting standards issued by the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) requiring municipalities to identify, measure and report certain costs associated with asset retirement.

Recommendation That Council approves the Asset Retirement Obligation Policy presented with this report that establishes guidelines to ensure compliance with the new standard PSAB PS 3280.

Background The Public Sector Accounting Board, an independent body created to develop accounting standards for municipalities, has further strengthened municipal asset management practices with the development of a new standard. This new standard, PS 3280 Asset Retirement Obligations, requires municipalities across Canada to recognize costs associated with the retirement of assets for the fiscal year end December 31, 2023. An asset retirement obligation is “a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset” and arises when there is a legal obligation to retire an asset from service. Asset retirement is defined as removing a capital asset from service and includes sale transactions, asset abandonment, and asset disposal. These costs may include, but are not limited to decommissioning, dismantling, and remediation of tangible capital assets and meeting any legislative mandates around environmental cleanup and/or restoring assets to their original condition.

Discussion/Analysis Municipalities need to approve an Asset Retirement Obligations Policy and incorporate the associated financial obligations into their financial statements beginning in the 2023 fiscal year. The asset retirement obligations should be capitalized and amortized, allocating the

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 161 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) Report

future costs of retirement in a rational and systematic manner over the remaining life of the asset. The recognition of the liability for future costs associated with the retirement of certain assets will ensure that funds will be available for the full cost of the asset disposal at the end of its useful life. While this standard is new, the practice is not entirely new as municipalities do currently recognize the environmental obligations associated with liabilities for contaminated sites and solid waste facilities. The intent of this new standard is to expand the requirements to other existing assets which have costs associated with their disposal because of a legal obligation. Some examples of when a legal obligation may exist include: •

• • •

Assets that require compliance with standards and regulations that, if sold, disposed of, or no longer in use, would require remediation, such as asbestos in buildings and in-ground piping, fuel storage tank removal, wells, firewater holding tanks, and septic beds; Leases that require removal of leasehold improvements or other remediation at the end of the lease, such as the reforestation of land subject to a timber lease; Land covenants that require removal at the end of their useful life; and Assets that need to be returned to their natural state at the end of their useful life, such as mining activities and landfills.

It is important that asset retirement obligations are reported correctly in the financial statements otherwise municipalities will risk having an adverse or qualified opinion on their financial statements. Process to Implement: The Treasurer or designate will work with all Department Heads to review assets to identify assets with retirement obligations. These assets will be reviewed with ARO Policy requirements to determine whether a financial liability, in accordance with PS 3280 exists. If there is a financial liability staff will work to estimate the liability value and record the necessary entries into the accounting records. In addition, the Treasurer or designate will ensure that the asset retirement obligations are recorded into the asset management software for tracking purposes. The value of the retirement obligation will be reviewed on a yearly basis. External Agencies Impacting Financial Statements The South Frontenac financial statements include consolidations from The Frontenac Arena. The new standard will also apply to that entity. Staff and the Township’s auditors will be required to ensure that these entities have appropriately captured their asset retirement obligations and a proportionate share will be consolidated into the South Frontenac Financial Statements.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 162 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) Report

Financial Implications A future report will be prepared for Council to outline the assets which have retirement obligations and the estimated costs of the retirement costs. It is not anticipated that there will be a significant impact on the Township’s financial position as a result of recognizing asset retirement obligations.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. •

Priority: Choose an item.

Climate Considerations ☒ Not applicable to this report.

Notice/Consultation

Auditors – KPMG LLP Other Municipalities in the County of Frontenac

Attachments

Draft Asset Retirement Obligations Policy

Approvals Submitted By: Jesse Collins, Acting Deputy Treasurer Approved By: Shelley Stedall

Shelley, Stedall Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 163 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO) Report

Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, COA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Attachment 2 Page 164 of 470 Township Of South Frontenac Section: Finance & Treasury

Policy Number: CS-2023-01

Sub-section: Asset Management

Effective Date: January 1, 2023

Subject: Asset Retirement Obligations Policy

Revision Date: Prepared by: Jesse Collins, Acting Deputy Treasurer & Approved by Shelley Stedall, Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer

Corporation of the Municipality of South Frontenac Municipal Asset Retirement Obligations Policy Contents

Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
Policy Statement ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
Purpose ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
Scope ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
Legislative Authority …………………………………………………………………………………….2
Definitions…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2
Administration and Accountability …………………………………………………………………. 3
Reporting Requirements……………………………………………………………………………….4
Guiding Principles ……………………………………………………………………………………….4
Recognition …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
Subsequent Measurement ………………………………………………………………………….5
Presentation and Disclosure ……………………………………………………………………….5
Policy Review ……………………………………………………………………………………………5 Appendix A ……………………………………………………………………………………………………6 Introduction 1.1 Recent changes to reporting standards by the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) requires municipalities to identify, measure, and report certain costs associated with asset retirement. Municipalities must prepare an Asset Retirement Obligation Policy that establishes guidelines to ensure compliance with the new standard PSAB 3280 – Asset Retirement Obligations.
Policy Statement 2.1 A policy governing the recording of qualifying Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs) under Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB) Section 3280.
Purpose 3.1 To document processes by which asset retirement obligations will be recognized, measured, updated, and integrated into existing processes, and related roles and responsibilities.

Page 165 of 470 Page 2 of 6 4. Scope 4.1 This Policy applies to all departments, boards, and agencies included in the financial reporting of The Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac (South Frontenac), that possess assets with asset retirement obligations including: a) Assets with legal title held by South Frontenac; b) Assets controlled by South Frontenac; c) Assets reported in any entities that are consolidated with South Frontenac for financial statement purposes; and d) Assets that have not been capitalized or recorded as tangible capital assets for financial statement purposes. The entity that is currently consolidated with South Frontenac currently includes: a) Frontenac Community Arena. 4.2

Scope of applicability is detailed in a decision tree which is attached to this Policy as Appendix A.

Legislative Authority 5.1 Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 (Municipal Act)
Definitions 6.1 Accretion expense is the increase in the carrying amount of the liability for asset retirement obligations due to the passage of time. Asset retirement activities include all activities related to an asset retirement obligation. These may include, but are not limited to: a) decommissioning or dismantling a tangible capital asset that was acquired, constructed or developed; b) remediation of contamination of a tangible capital asset created by its normal use; c) post-retirement activities such as monitoring; and d) constructing other tangible capital assets to perform post-retirement activities. Asset retirement cost is the estimated amount required to retire a tangible capital asset. Asset retirement obligation is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset.

Page 166 of 470 Page 3 of 6 Productive use means the tangible capital asset is held for use in the production or supply of goods and services, for rental to others, for administrative purposes, or for the development, construction, maintenance, or repair of other tangible capital assets. Promissory estoppel is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as “the principle that a promise made without consideration may nonetheless be enforced to prevent injustice if the promisor should have reasonably expected the promisee to rely on the promise and the promisee did actually rely on the promise to his or her detriment.” Retirement of a tangible capital asset is the permanent removal of a tangible capital asset from service. This term encompasses sale, abandonment, or disposal in some other manner but not its temporary idling. 7. Administration and Accountability 7.1 Departments Heads are required to: a) Communicate to the Treasurer any retirement obligations, and any changes in asset condition or retirement timelines; b) Assist in the preparation of cost estimates for retirement obligations and are responsible for providing cost-effective projections of asset retirement obligations, by consulting with engineers, technicians, and others familiar with the assets and conditional assessments, collecting the relevant information required to minimize service cost, and providing the information to the Treasurer for processing; and c) Inform the Treasurer of any legal or contractual obligations at the inception of any such obligation. 7.2

The Treasurer is responsible for the development of and adherence to policies for the accounting and reporting of asset retirement obligations in accordance with Public Sector Accounting Board PS 3280. This includes responsibility for: a) Monitoring the application of this Policy; b) Preparation and managing written processes within the accounting systems; c) Investigating issues and working with asset stewards to resolve issues; d) Ensuring asset management software reflects accurate asset retirement obligation costs; and e) Reporting asset retirement obligations in the financial statements of South Frontenac and other statutory financial documents.

Reporting Requirements 8.1 The Treasurer shall, for each fiscal year, prepare annual financial statements for South Frontenac in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for municipalities as recommended, from time to time, by the Public Sector Accounting Board of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada. This includes the reporting of ARO in the annual financial statements in accordance with PSAB PS 3280.

Page 167 of 470 Page 4 of 6

Guiding Principles 9.1 Existing provincial and federal laws and regulations require municipalities to take specific actions to retire certain tangible capital assets at the end of their useful lives. This includes activities such as the removal of asbestos and the retirement of landfills. Other obligations to retire tangible capital assets may arise from contracts, court judgments, or lease arrangements. 9.2

The legal obligations, including obligations created by promises made without formal consideration, associated with the retirement of tangible capital assets controlled by South Frontenac, will be recognized as a liability in the financial books of South Frontenac, in accordance with PSAB PS 3280 effective January 1, 2023.

9.3

Asset retirement obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development, or normal use of an asset. These obligations are predictable, likely to occur, and unavoidable. Asset retirement obligations are separate and distinct from contaminated site liabilities. The liability for contaminated sites normally results from unexpected contamination exceeding the environmental standards. Asset retirement obligations are not necessarily associated with contamination.

Recognition 10.1 A liability should be recognized when, as at the financial reporting date: a) there is a legal obligation to incur retirement costs in relation to a tangible capital asset; b) the past transaction or event giving rise to the liability has occurred; c) it is expected that future economic benefits will be given up; and d) a reasonable estimate of the amount can be made. Liabilities for an asset retirement obligation cannot be recognized unless all of the criteria above are satisfied. 10.2 The estimate of the liability would be based on requirements in existing agreements, contracts, legislation, or legally enforceable obligations, and technology expected to be used in asset retirement activities. 10.3 The estimate of liabilities should include costs directly attributable to asset retirement activities. Costs would include post-retirement operation, maintenance, and monitoring which are an integral part of the retirement of the tangible capital asset. 10.4 Directly attributable costs would include, but are not limited to, payroll and benefits, equipment and facilities, materials, legal and other professional fees, and overhead costs directly attributable to the asset retirement activity. 10.5 Upon initial recognition of a liability for an asset retirement obligation, South Frontenac will recognize an asset retirement cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related tangible capital asset (or a component thereof) by the same amount as the liability. Where the obligation relates to an asset that is no longer in

Page 168 of 470 Page 5 of 6 service, and not providing economic benefit, or to an item not recorded by South Frontenac as an asset, the obligation is expensed upon recognition.

10.6 The capitalization thresholds applicable to the different asset categories will also be applied to the asset retirement obligations to be recognized within each of those asset categories. 11. Subsequent Measurement 11.1 The asset retirement costs will be capitalized and amortized allocating the future costs of the retirement in a rational and systematic allocation (straight-line method) over the useful life of the tangible capital asset or a component of the asset. 11.2 On an annual basis, the existing asset retirement obligations will be assessed for any changes in expected cost, term to retirement, or any other changes that may impact the estimated obligation. In addition, any new obligations identified will also be assessed. 12. Presentation and Disclosure 12.1 The liability for asset retirement obligations will be disclosed. 13. Policy Review 13.1 This policy will be reviewed every five years, or upon the direction of South Frontenac Council, or if staff identify an issue requiring a revision to occur.

Page 169 of 470 Page 6 of 6

Page 170 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Corporate Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject: Cloud Server Migration RFP

Summary This report provides information on the results of the procurement process for the Migration to a Cloud- Hosted Server Request for Proposal (RFP) and request support in the award of the contract.

Recommendation That Council support awarding the Migration to a Cloud- Hosted Server contract in the amount of $85,104.74 including non-rebatable HST to IC 360 Solutions Inc.,

Background The Township of South Frontenac currently has on-premise servers, which holds the data and software the Township needs in order to operate its business. Historically and in the future, the staff that use these systems have had to transition to remote locations. With the pending administration building renovations, not only staff but the server will need to be relocated. Staff are recommending that the data and software be moved to a Cloud hosted environment. This transformative project is also driven by the need to achieve greater flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency in managing the organization’s IT resources while ensuring long-term reliability and security. In addition to infrastructure migration, the project includes modernizing SQL and Active Directory with Azure-based technologies. Articles that help explain why this decision has been made are here: https://ibistechnology.com/why-you-should-move-from-on-premise-to-cloud-computing/ https://www.bdo.ca/insights/erp-in-the-cloud-dispelling-common-myths-to-help-you-makethe-move The issued RFP and project were developed with the Township’s IT contracted staff at the County of Frontenac. The project includes moving all data and software from the current server to a hosted cloud as well as moving the Township’s on-premise telephone system through standard phone lines to a Cloud-based Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) system.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 171 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Cloud Server Migration RFP

Discussion/Analysis On November 21, 2023, an RFP was issued to solicit from qualified Bidders to modernize the entirety of the current on-premises Information Technology infrastructure to a cloud hosted solution(s). The RFP closed on December 7, 2023. Five submissions were received and evaluated by the Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer and the County of Frontenac Information Technology team. The results were as follows: Name

Score 96

Price (incl. nonrebatable HST) 85,104.74

ITI Canada Inc

88.25

98,422.08

Cloud4C Services MTX Technologies Inc.

73.5

120,277.47

73.25

104,519.05

110,740.00

IC 360 Solutions Inc

Levio Consiels Inc.

IC 360 provided the strongest proposal and demonstrated their previous experience with transitioning clients of the Township’s size and complexity for the server move as well as the telephone service transition. The County IT staff have worked with IC 360 Solutions in the past and found them knowledgeable and completing projects within set deadlines and set budgets. Interviews were completed with IC 360 Solutions, ITI Canada and MTX Technologies. Following this, references were contracted with IC 360 solutions to aid the evaluation team in making the recommendation.

Financial Implications The 2024 budget includes $85,000 for this project, which brings in IC 360 solutions quote slightly higher by $104.74. The pricing includes licencing fees which may be lower once the system is implemented. The change in telephone systems from the current hardline system to VOIP will result in a net zero increased in cost, as the new licencing for TEAMS voice is transitioned and the Bell costs are reduced as lines are cancelled.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 172 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Cloud Server Migration RFP

•

Priority: 3. Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world.

Climate Considerations ☐ Not applicable.

Consultations County of Frontenac IT Team

Approvals Prepared By:

Shelley Stedall Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 173 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject: 2024 Summer Student Compensation Change

Summary This report outlines the rationale for an increase to the Summer Student Compensation for 2024.

Recommendation That Council provide approval for the Summer Student Wage Grid for 2024 itemized under Table 1 of the Staff Report.

Background Each year, South Frontenac hires a dedicated group of summer students to assist with various projects, community recreational programs, and parks and roads maintenance. They play a crucial role in supporting our operations and contributing to the well-being of our community. While engaged in meaningful work with the Township, students develop new skills and gain experiences that are transferrable to their educational and career pursuits. Historically, the Township has utilized the hourly minimum wage as a benchmark for Step 1 of the four-step student wage grid. On October 1, 2023, minimum wage was increased to $16.55 from $15.50 per hour. This represents a six percent (6%) increase.

Discussion/Analysis Maintaining a competitive wage for our summer students will help us attract motivated and skilled students who are essential to the success of our summer programs and initiatives. This will also assist us in retaining experienced students who have made positive contributions in previous years, which in turn provides continuity and efficiency in our operations. Offering a competitive hourly wage for all summer student positions helps to attract highquality candidates which supports the Township in providing quality services to the community.

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - 2024 Summer Student Compensation Change

Page 174 of 470

The current Summer Student Wage Grid is structured to ensure an appropriate compression ratio between the student positions, reflecting the knowledge, skill, effort and working conditions associated with them. A six percent (6%) increase would be required for each of the four steps in the wage grid to maintain the established compression ratio, as noted below: Table 1 Pay Code ST-01 ST-02 ST-03 ST-04

2023 Rate 15.61 17.50 18.25 19.50

Proposed 2024 Rate 16.55 18.55 19.35 20.67

The proposed rates still maintains a solid compression ratio between the student rates and the bargaining unit rates. The Level I hourly rate for 2024 bargaining unit positions is $24.14.

Financial Implications This year, we will require 18,520 hours of student labour. Based on this identified student staffing need for 2024, the total gross wages would be $341,341.20 compared to $272,116.00 in 2023. This represents an increase of $69,225.00. The increase is also comprised of additional Day Camp staff needed to resume day camp programming at McMullen Point. The overall increase will be partially offset by an adjustment to the user fees for these programs.

Relationship to Strategic Plan ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan: 3. Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world.

Approvals Prepared by: Jan Minaker, Manager of Human Resources Approved by:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 175 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Public Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject:

Request for Speed Limit Reduction – Storrington Public School

Summary The purpose of this report is to provide background on a request for a speed limit reduction on Battersea Road that was recently received from the Storrington Public School.

Recommendation Open.

Background On October 4th, 2022, the Public Services Department presented a report to Council providing an outline of speed limit changes on Battersea Road that were directly associated with the new Station 8 Firehall project at 4490 Battersea Road. At that time, the recommendation was put forward for a new 60km/hr speed zone extending 650m from Millburn Road heading northerly on Battersea Road. This speed limit change took several factors into consideration including the sharp curve, Sand Hill Cemetery, operations of Tackaberry’s Gilburt Quarry and the new Station 8 Firehall site. On October 11th, 2022, Council passed Bylaw # 2022-96 supporting a speed limit reduction from 80km/hr to 60km/hr for the area. The new sign materials were ordered and the speed limit area was later signed in the spring of 2023 ahead of the schedule for the new firehall opening. During the summer of this year, the Department received several calls from residents inquiring about the new speed limit near the school. Staff later reached out directly to the school to enquire about their operations and had an extended conversation with the principal about site operations. The principal at the school, Mr. Ean Pattison, later advised that the speed limits were actively being discussed at the parent teacher committee meetings in September. On November 16th, Mr. Pattison, on behalf of Storrington Public School submitted a request for a speed limit reduction on Battersea Road. This request was paired with a letter of

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 176 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Request for Speed Limit Reduction – Storrington Public School

support from the Tri-Board Student Transportation Services and a petition with over 130 signatures.

Discussion/Analysis The Township currently has a speed limit inquiry process posted on the municipal website. Recent discussions at Council on speed limit changes earlier in 2023 had highlighted the need for further discussion on the process along with review triggers. Public Services staff have been doing active research on municipal speed limit policies in Eastern Ontario and that process is not expected to be completed until spring. Research has shown that the majority of municipalities do not have policies relating to speed limit requests. Those municipalities that did have policies appear to be reviewing or updating policies in response to increased demands from the public. Township staff believe it would be beneficial to see the outcomes of some of these studies before advancing any new policy in this area. The City of Kingston and County of Lanark policy updates are among those actively being followed staff at this time. Currently, Council has several options to consider in response to this request from the Storrington Public School. Option 1 – Direct staff to advance technical review on the request from Storrington Public School. Option 2 – Defer review of the request from the Storrington Public School until speed limit policy updates have been completed by staff and approved by Council. Option 3 – Deny the request to review posted speed limits.

Financial Implications Not applicable to this report.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •

Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable):

Climate Considerations ☒ Not applicable to this report. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 177 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Request for Speed Limit Reduction – Storrington Public School

☐ This initiative supports climate change mitigation/adaption efforts in South Frontenac; and/or impacts the Township’s resilience to climate change.

Notice/Consultation •

None

Attachments • •

Appendix A – Speed Limit Reduction Request E. Pattison Appendix B – Letter of Support – Tri-Board Student Transportation Services

Approvals Submitted By:

Reviewed By:

W. Troy Dunlop, C.E.T. Manager of Engineering and Capital Projects

Kyle Bolton, C.E.T. Director of Public Services

Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

SignedPetitionRoadSpeedLimitReductionRequest.pdf; Storrington Speed LimitReducation Letter of Support.pdf; Change-Request—for—Speed—Limits.pdf

Troy Dunlop December 8, 2023 4:24 PM Troy Dunlop FW: Speed Limit Reduction Request

Sincerely,

Ifyou have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

To whom it may concern, My name is Ean Pattison and I am the principal at Storrington Public School. lam writing to you to ask for your support in our request for a speed limit reduction in front of the school. We understand that the speed limit, in front ofthe school, has historically been 80 km/h but we are requesting that the area from the new township ?refall to Round Lake Road, be reduced to 60 km/h. We feel that this change is needed to ensure the safety of not only the children who attend Storrington but also their parents and school community members. Prior to the school day and during recess, students are accessing the yard/playground. There have been occasions where a soccer ball or basketball made its way to the road and the initial reaction from students is to run and get it. Although we have provided several reminders to students that it needs to be an adult who retrieves the ball, students sometimes respond impulsively without much thought. A reduction in speed will ensure that drivers are travelling at a speed where they can safely stop to avoid any students. As a school, we are always looking for ways to invite our Storrington community to join us and participate in school events. To ensure that everyone can attend, it sometimes means that community members must park on Battersea Road. This makes it dif?cult for vehicles leaving the school parking lot as visibility is reduced. By reducing the speed limit, it will ensure that drivers are able to safely slow down or stop to avoid vehicles that are leaving the parking lot. As a rural school, almost all students take the bus to and from Storrington. At the end of each day, we have 6 school buses leaving school property which leads to a heavy ?ow of traf?c pulling out onto Battersea Road. Again, the reduction in speed limit would allow drivers traveling on Battersea Road the opportunity to safely avoid any buses pulling out of the school parking lot. Kindly see the attached letter of support from Jeremy DaCosta, CEO of Tri—BoardStudent Transportation Services and a signed pe?tion from Storrington community members.

|imestone.on.ca> From: Pattison, Ean, W. < attisonean Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 4:43 PM To: pwsupport < wsu ort southfrontenac.net> Subject: Speed Limit Reduction Request

Attachments:

To: Subject:

Sent:

From:

Troy Dunlop

Page 178 of 470

613-329-62

11/16/2023

Date

Time of Day most impacted by speeding

What direction? Both, north bound, west bound etc.

Petition is attached.

Petition from other concerned citizens? (if so, please attach)

The existing speed limit is 80 km/h.

What is the existing Speed Limit posted?

Both directions—north and south bound.

Rationale

The time of day most impacted is from 8:50 am to 3:55 pm.

Rationale

Proposed change from the new township firefall to Round Lake Road.

Description of proposed change (specific section of street or road, between Civic #’s)

Change Request Form

Ean Pattison (pattisonean@|imestone.on.ca,

Requested by: (Please include email and phone number)

Speed Limit Reduction Request

Page 179 of 470

Page 180 of 470

Page 181 of 470

Page 182 of 470

Page 183 of 470

Page 184 of 470

Page 185 of 470

Page 186 of 470

Page 187 of 470

Page 188 of 470

Page 189 of 470

Page 190 of 470

.VI

§\RNm§aN

Page 191 of 470

Page 192 of 470

Page 193 of 470

October 23, 2023 Ean Pattison Storrington Public School 4576 Battersea Road Battersea, ON K0H 1H0 pattisonean@limestone.on.ca Dear Mr. Pattison, Tri-Board Student Transportation Services is accountable for safe, secure, and efficient transportation to our school communities in partnership with our member school boards, including the Limestone District School Board. We work closely with schools and our school bus operators to ensure the safety of students. Tri-Board and our bus operators contracted to service Storrington PS support the request to reduce the speed limit on Battersea Road in the vicinity of Storrington Public School to improve safety for school buses as they enter/exit school property. I left a voicemail message today with Mr. Troy Dunlop, Manager of Engineering and Capital Projects, at South Frontenac Township confirming Tri-Board’s support for a speed reduction in this area. If you require any further information, please let me know. Sincerely,

Jeremy DaCosta Chief Executive Officer Tri-Board Student Transportation Services dacostaj@triboard.ca CC: Craig Young, Superintendent of Corporate & Staff Services

ii nf nf o o @tr @tr ii boar boar d.c d.c a a t. t. 6 6 13.3 13.3 5 5 4. 4. 19 19 8 8 11 81 Dairy Ave, Napanee ON K7R 1M5 PO Box 235 Napanee ON K7R 3M3

www.triboard.ca www.triboard.ca

Page 194 of 470

To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 19, 2023 Subject: Updated Asset Management Plan

Summary This report summarizes summarized the 2023 Asset Management Plan that is submitted for Council approval.

Recommendation THAT Council approve the 2023 Asset Management Plan as attached in the staff report.

Background In 2017 the Province approved O.Reg 588/17, which requires Ontario municipalities develop Asset Management Plans (AMP). The Regulation indicated that municipalities must: • • • •

Develop a strategic asset management policy by July 01, 2019 Develop an asset management plan including core infrastructure assets with current levels of service by July 01, 2022 Develop an asset management plan including all infrastructure assets with current levels of service by July 01, 2024 Develop an asset management plan with proposed levels of service, and lifecycle management and financial strategy by July 01, 2025

South Frontenac approved the Asset Management Policy in 2019. The Township of South Frontenac approved an Asset Management Plan (AMP) in 2016, which provided a base inventory and financial direction at that time on the Township core assets. This December 2023 update specifically provides reporting on the Core Asset groups that include hard surfaced roads, large bridges and culverts, drinking water and stormwater drainage assets. This update improves the inventory, condition ratings and replacement costs which have been updated with 2022 costs. Each section of the Asset Management Plan (Roads, Bridges, Water and Stormwater) sets out the following information: •

A summary of the asset inventory in the category

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 195 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Updated Asset Management Plan

• • • • • •

The average age of the assets in the category, determined by assessing the average age of components of the assets The replacement cost of the assets in each service area The condition rating systems and overall condition of the assets Data sources for the AMP records and update Technical and community levels of service benchmarking as required to meet the requirements of O Reg 588/17; and A description of the lifecycle strategies for each Core Asset group.

As of the end of 2022, the current replacement value of the Township’s Core Asset group was approximately $335 million dollars. Based on a 10-year forecast and looking at assets on a harmonized standard of replacement the current Municipal Tax Levy is sufficient at this time to finance forecasted expenditures in the current year, for tax supported assets. However, it is important to continue to regularly review these figures to ensure that the infrastructure levy is sufficient to support growth and increased costs. Strategies such as preventative maintenance and enhanced rehabilitation work will also be key to sustainability when developing future Capital plans for budgeting. Figure EX.1 provides an outline of the overall core asset cost distribution and Figure EX.2 provides a summary for the overall condition ratings for the reporting group.

Figure EX.1 – Overall Core Asset Cost Distribution

Asset Value Distribution

Bridges & Culverts, $45,043,714

Water Facilities, $8,372,183 Water Mains, $4,847,116 Storm Sewers, $10,194,159

Roads, $267,210,200

Figure EX.2 – Overall Core Asset Condition

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 196 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Updated Asset Management Plan

Replacement Value

Asset Condition $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0

45%

28% 16%

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Critical

Asset Condition

Like most municipalities across Ontario, a portion of the assets are in poor or very poor condition. These assets should be addressed on a priority basis using a risk-based approach which is currently incorporated into the Core Asset Management Plan. It is important to note that the projected date of renewal of assets is a guideline. With the risk factors and other elements that may occur, the year of renewal may change. The asset management plan is meant to be a tool and is also a living document that will be updated as the asset inventory asset conditions and risk change. With the changing economical environment, it will also be important to update replacement costs based on market values. This asset management plan, as presented, aligns with the previous asset management plan, the long range financial plan and the five year roads rehabilitation plan.

Financial Implications The Asset Management Plan does not commit Council to fund any one project, but it is a tool that is used to assess the financial requirements of the municipality relating to its core asset renewals.

Relationship to Strategic Plans ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. •

Priority: 3. Ensure the organizational capacity to deliver cost-effective services in a changing world.

Attachments

2023 Asset Management Plan

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 197 of 470 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Updated Asset Management Plan

Approvals Submitted By:

W. Troy Dunlop, C.E.T. Manager of Engineering and Capital Projects

Shelley Stedall, Dipl. B.Admin. AMCT Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer Approved By:

Louise Fragnito, CPA, CGA Chief Administrative Officer

www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.

Page 198 of 470

Township of South Frontenac Asset Management Plan Update Core Assets – December 2023

Page 199 of 470 Page |2

Executive Summary The Township of South Frontenac is updating its 2016 Asset Management Plan (AMP) to align with the Township’s strategic asset management policy and to also comply with the new regulations guiding municipalities under Ontario Regulation 588/17 – Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure. This December 2023 update specifically provides reporting on the Core Asset groups that include hard surfaced roads, large bridges and culverts, drinking water and stormwater drainage assets. The core assets may be found in the following sections:   

Section 3.0 – Transportation (Roads and Bridges) Section 4.0 - Drinking Water System Section 5.0 - Stormwater Management

Each section of the AMP sets out the following information:       

A summary of the asset inventory in the category The average age of the assets in the category, determined by assessing the average age of components of the assets The replacement cost of the assets in each service area The condition rating systems and overall condition of the assets Data sources for the AMP records and update Technical and community levels of service benchmarking as required to meet the requirements of O Reg 588/17; and A description of the lifecycle strategies for each Core Asset group.

As of the end of 2022, the current replacement value of the Township’s Core Asset group was approximately $335 million dollars. Figure EX.1 provides an outline of the overall core asset cost distribution and Figure EX.2 provides a summary for the overall condition ratings for the reporting group.

Asset Management Plan

Page 200 of 470 Page |3

Figure EX.1 – Overall Core Asset Cost Distribution

Asset Value Distribution

Bridges & Culverts, $45,043,714 Water Facilities, $8,372,183 Water Mains, $4,847,116 Storm Sewers, $10,194,159

Roads, $267,210,200

Figure EX.2 – Overall Core Asset Condition Asset Condition 45%

$160,000,000

Replacement Value

$140,000,000 $120,000,000

28%

$100,000,000 $80,000,000

16%

$60,000,000 $40,000,000

Poor

Critical

$20,000,000 $0 Excellent

Good

Fair Asset Condition

Like most municipalities across Ontario, a portion of the assets are in poor or very poor condition. These assets should be addressed on a priority basis using a risk-based Asset Management Plan

Page 201 of 470 Page |4

approach which is currently incorporated into the Core Asset Management Plan. Figure EX.3 below provided a summary of the risk distribution for each of the service areas and includes a summary in the bar graph below.

Figure EX.3 – Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution

Based on a 10-year forecast and looking at assets on a harmonized standard of replacement the current Municipal Tax Levy is sufficient at this time to finance forecasted expenditures in the current year, for tax supported assets. In the near short term, increases in the infrastructure levy to support growth and increased costs will be required. Strategies such as preventative maintenance and enhanced rehabilitation work will be key to sustainability when developing future Capital plans for budgeting. By taking a longer-term view, over the next 100 years, the Tax Supported Capital Levy needs to be reviewed on a consistent basis to finance Core Asset expenditures.

Asset Management Plan

Page 202 of 470 Page |5

Table of Contents ES Executive Summary………………………………………………… 1.

Introduction………………………………………………………….. 11 1.1

Purpose of the Plan……………………………………………………….

1.2

Alignment with Other Township Policies………………………………

1.3

Strategic Plan 2023 – 2026……………………………………………..

1.4

Changes in Growth in Population………………………………………

Asset Management Plan, Framework and Methodology…….

2.1

Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan……………………………..

2.2

Stakeholders in the Updates of the AM Plan………………………….

2.3

Framework and Methodology of the AM Plan…………………………

Core Assets – Transportation…………………………………….

3.1

Asset Inventory……………………………………………………………

3.2

Profile and Age of Assets………………………………………………..

3.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems…………………………………

3.3.1

Road Pavement Condition………………………………………………

3.3.2

Structure Condition – Bridges and Culvers (>3m Span)……………..

3.3.3

Asset Condition Summary – Transportation…………………………..

3.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

3.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

3.5.1

Community Levels of Service……………………………………………

3.5.2

Technical Levels of Service……………………………………………..

3.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

3.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Core Assets – Drinking Water System………………………….

4.1

Asset Inventory……………………………………………………………

4.2

Profile and Age of Assets………………………………………………..

4.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems…………………………………

Asset Management Plan

Page 203 of 470 Page |6

Table of Contents (continued)

4.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

4.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

4.5.1

Community Levels of Service…………………………………………… 37

4.5.2

Technical Levels of Service…………………………………………….. 38

4.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

4.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Core Assets – Stormwater Management……………………….. 43 5.1

Asset Inventory…………………………………………………………… 43

5.2

Profile and Age of Assets……………………………………………….. 44

5.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems………………………………… 45

5.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

5.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

5.5.1

Community Levels of Service…………………………………………… 48

5.5.2

Technical Levels of Service…………………………………………….. 49

5.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

5.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Asset Management Strategy……………………………………… 52 6.1

Asset Management Strategy……………………………………………

6.2

Risk Management………………………………………………………..

6.2.1

Probability of Failure……………………………………………………..

6.2.2

Consequence of Failure…………………………………………………

6.2.3

Risk Assessment Matrix…………………………………………………

Financing Strategy………………………………………………….. 56 7.1

Sources of Funding…….………………………………………………… 56

7.2

Short Term Funding Strategy….……………………………………….. 57

7.3

Long Term Financing Strategy……….………………………………… 59

7.4

A Living Document..……………………………………………………..

Conclusions and Recommendations…………………………… 61

Asset Management Plan

Page 204 of 470 Page |7

APPENDICES Appendix A1 – Map of Road Network Appendix A2 – Pavement Condition Ratings - Photos Appendix A3 – Large Bridges and Culverts Ratings – Photos Appendix B1 – Map of Drinking Water System Appendix C1 – Maps of Storm Drainage Systems Appendix D1 – Risk Rating Systems Appendix E – Core Asset Data Tables

Asset Management Plan

Page 205 of 470 Page |8

Table Index Core Assets - Transportation Table 3.1

Core Transportation Asset Details and Valuation…………………..

Table 3.2

Average Core Transportation Asset Age…………………………….

Table 3.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 3.4

Five Point Condition Rating System – PCI…………………………..

Table 3.5

Five Point Condition Rating System – BCI…………………………..

Table 3.6

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 3.7

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Roads……………………………

Table 3.8

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Bridges………………………….

Table 3.9

Qualitative Description of Roadways……………………………………

Table 3.10

Qualitative Description of Bridges…………………………………….

Table 3.11

Technical LOS for Road – Lane-km………………………………….

Table 3.12

Technical LOS – Pavement Condition Index………………………….

Table 3.13

Table 3.14

Technical LOS for Bridges – Loading or Dimensional Restrictions…………………………………………………………….. Technical Los – Bridge Condition Index……………………………..

Table 3.15

Maintenance and Monitoring – Roads and Bridges………………..

Table 3.16

Rehabilitation and Renewal - Roads and Bridges………………….

Table 3.17

Transportation Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs………………….

Core Assets Drinking Water Table 4.1

Core Drinking Water Asset Details and Valuation………………….

Table 4.2

Core Drinking Water Asset Age………………………………………

Table 4.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 4.4

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 4.5

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Water Assets……………………

Table 4.6

Qualitative Description of Water Assets……………………………..

Table 4.7

Technical LOS for Water System……………………………………..

Table 4.8

Maintenance and Monitoring – Water Distribution……………………

Asset Management Plan

Page 206 of 470 Page |9

Table Index (continued) Table 4.9

Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities…………………………….

Table 4.10

Rehabilitation and Renewal – Water Assets…………………………

Table 4.11

Water System Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs…………………..

Core Assets Stormwater Management Table 5.1

Stormwater Management Asset Details and Valuation…………….

Table 5.2

Core Stormwater Asset Age…………………………………………..

Table 5.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 5.4

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 5.5

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Stormwater Assets…………….

Table 5.6

Qualitative Description of Stormwater Assets……………………….

Table 5.7

Technical LOS for Stormwater System…………………………………

Table 5.8

Maintenance and Monitoring – Stormwater Management…………

Table 5.9

Rehabilitation and Renewal – Stormwater Management…………..

Table 5.10

Stormwater Asset Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs…………………

Asset Management Strategy Table 6.1

Probability of Failure Score………………………………………………

Table 6.2

Consequence of Failure Score………………………………………..

Table 6.3

Renewal Strategy Based on Risk…………………………………….

Asset Management Plan

Page 207 of 470 P a g e | 10

Figure Index Core Assets - Transportation Figure 3.1.1

Age Profile- Paved Roadways HCB Asphalt…….…………………..

Figure 3.1.2

Age Profile- Paved Roadways LCB Surface Treated ….…………..

Figure 3.2

Age Profile - Bridges Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)………………….

Figure 3.3

Age Profile - Culverts Span 3m or Greater (OSIM) .………………

Figure 3.4.1

Condition Ratings – Roads (HCB Asphalt)…………………………..

Figure 3.4.2

Figure 3.5

Condition Ratings – Roads (LCB Surface Treated)………………… Condition Ratings – Bridges (OSIM)…………………………………

Figure 3.6

Condition Ratings – Culverts (OSIM)………………………………..

Core Assets Drinking Water Figure 4.1

Age Profile – Drinking Water Distribution Assets………………….,

Figure 4.2

Age Profile – Treatment / Storage Assets…..………………………

Figure 4.3

Condition Ratings – Water Distribution…..………………………….

Figure 4.4

Condition Ratings – Treatment / Storage Assets ……………..……

Core Assets – Stormwater Management Figure 5.1

Age Profile- Stormwater Treatment Unit Assets..…………………..

Figure 5.2

Age Profile- Storm Collection Assets………………… ….…………..

Figure 5.3

Condition Ratings – Stormwater Treatment Units…………………..

Figure 5.4

Condition Ratings – Stormwater Collection Assets. .………………

Asset Management Strategy Figure 6.1

Risk Matrix……………………………………………………………….

Figure 6.2

Overall Core Asset Condition Ratings………..………………………

Figure 6.3

Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution….…..………………………….

Financing Strategy Figure 7.1

10 Year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs….………………….

Figure 7.1.1

Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) ……………….

Figure 7.2

100 Year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs……………………

Figure 7.1.2

Tax Supported Assets………………………………………………….

Asset Management Plan

Page 208 of 470 P a g e | 11

1.0 Introduction On January 1st, 2018, the Province of Ontario passed Ontario Regulation 588/17 – Asset Management Planning for Municipal Infrastructure under the Infrastructure for Jobs and Prosperity Act, 2015. This regulation set out various requirements for municipal asset management planning to help municipalities determine infrastructure needs and to set a framework to guide infrastructure planning and investment decisions. Under the framework of the regulation each municipality is required to prepare its first strategic asset management policy by July 1, 2019. The policy addresses a framework of twelve separate components found within the regulation and is updated once every five years. On June 18th, 2019, Council met the first milestone of the regulation and adopted its first Strategic Asset Management Policy for the Township of South Frontenac. A copy of the plan is available for viewing on the Township’s website. On July 1st, 2022, O Reg 588/17 lays out the next major milestone in asset management when municipalities will be required to prepare an asset management plan in respect to its core municipal infrastructure assets.

1.1

Purpose of the Plan

The 2023 Asset Management Plan Update – Core Assets (AMP) aligns with the Township’s Strategic Asset Management Policy and further serves to meet the requirements of the next phase of Ontario Regulation 588/17. Core assets defined under the regulation for this phase of the AMP update include:     

1.2

Water assets that relate to the collection, production, treatment, storage, or distribution of water, Wastewater asset that relates to the collection, transmission, treatment, or disposal of wastewater, including any wastewater asset that from time to time manages stormwater, Stormwater management asset that relates to the collection, transmission, retention, infiltration, control or disposal of stormwater, Road, or Bridge or Culvert

Alignment with Other Township Policies

The 2023 Asset Management Plan Update – Core Assets was reviewed and compiled internally by Township staff. The following documents were included in the review process and incorporated through the development of the current update:     

Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003) Township of South Frontenac Strategic Plan 2023 - 2026 Municipal Budgets and other Financial Documents Development Charges Bylaw 2019-48 (2019) Sydenham Water Financial Plan

Asset Management Plan

Page 209 of 470 P a g e | 12



O. Reg. 239/02 – Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways

The Township’s continued use of asset management software has helped guide the municipality in decision-making processes that are both timely and effective in optimizing the lifecycles of major assets. This software currently manages assets on a like for like basis however and does not currently incorporate major upgrades or growth-related needs. Township staff are continuing to utilize these platforms for managing a growing inventory of new assets as we move into the next phase of the regulation.

1.3

Strategic Plan 2023 – 2026

On December 5th, 2023, Township Council passed their 2023-2026 Strategic Plan. The plan updates the Vision ,Mission and Values for the Corporation and establishes strategic pillars for Sustainable Long-Term Prosperity, Municipal Service Excellence, and People and Partnerships. The three key pillars set forward the direction for the municipality and key elements that relate directly to the Township’s infrastructure assets are captured below: Pillar 1 - Sustainable Long-Term Prosperity 

Financial Sustainability – Our aim is to continue to maintain a focus on prudent financial management through long-term financial planning. This includes integrating other critical plans such as our Asset Management Plan, Recreation, Parks and Leisure Master Plan, and Transportation Master Plan.



Resilience and Adaptation – Our commitment is to foster community resilience to climate change through the safeguarding of our natural assets and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

Pillar 2 – Municipal Service Excellence 

Evidence Based – Our commitment is to use data-driven insights for informed planning and decision-making. Where available, tools such as performance indicators and analytics will be used within proposals, reports and day-to-day decision making.



Customer Focus – Our goal is to enhance customer service and community outreach, making it more accessible through clear communications, self-service, and staff support and resources.



Long-Term Planning – The Township is dedicated to developing and implementing long-term financial and master plans to ensure the sustainability of our programs and services.



Operational Efficiency – We will optimize processes, service levels, resources, and systems to modernize service delivery, streamline operations, maximize costeffectiveness, and support and empower management to innovate municipal service delivery.

Asset Management Plan

Page 210 of 470 P a g e | 13

Pillar 3 – People and Partnerships 

1.4

Partnership Development – Forge collaborative relationships with external organizations, stakeholders, and neighbouring communities to leverage resources, share expertise, and achieve common goals for the betterment of the community.

Changes in Growth in Population

Watsons & Associates Economists was retained by the Township of South Frontenac in 2019 to undertake an assessment of the Township’s growth potential by settlement area to the year 2046. This study was commissioned as a technical background document to support the Township’s Growth Management Study and Official Plan review. This growth analysis largely focused on the allocation of residential and non-residential development throughout the Township by settlement area and remaining rural area. The following provides a summary of the key findings of this report with respect to forecast population, housing and employment trends for South Frontenac: Regional and Local Economic Growth Drivers  



Economic growth in South Frontenac is closely tied to the City of Kingston. The proximity of South Frontenac to Kingston’s employment market represents a key driver of permanent population growth and distribution of local housing demand; The Township is characterized by a blend of expansive rural lands and settlement areas. The existing employment base is concentrated in retail, small to mediumscale industrial and commercial business and home occupations, government and education , accommodation and food services, agriculture and tourism; and Quality of life attributes offered in South Frontenac are also expected to drive net migration from a broad range of demographic groups, including first time home buyers, families, empty nesters and seniors.

Employment Growth Forecast   



The Township’s employment base is expected to increase by approximately 1,100 jobs between 2016 and 2046, increasing from 3,300 to 4,400. This represents an annual growth rate of 1% over the 30-year forecast period; Employment growth in work at home and no fixed place of work categories is forecast to account for the majority of all job growth in South Frontenac; Population-related employment (commercial/institutional including work at home and no fixed place of work employment) is anticipated to follow population growth. Alongside commercial employment growth in Inverary, the settlement areas of Hartington and Harrowsmith have potential to facilitate highway commercial employment uses; The majority of industrial employment growth is forecasted to occur in primary settlement areas with some opportunity for rural development. The settlement area of Sydenham has potential for light industrial growth on municipal water services; and

Asset Management Plan

Page 211 of 470 P a g e | 14



The Inverary employment area also represents a marketable location to facilitate the bulk of industrial employment.

Residential Growth Forecast 



 

Based on the 2019 study by Watson and Associates, the Township of South Frontenac permanent population base is forecasted to increase over the next 30 years, from approximately 19,100 in 2016 to 23,800 in 2046. This represents an annual growth rate of 0.7%; Major changes occurred during the pandemic and there was substantial growth, with the 2021 Stats Canada showing the population growth to 20,188, which was an 8.3% change from the 2016 census. In 2024, the township is once again engaging a third party to update the population projections based on this new information Over the 2016 to 2046 forecast period, new housing growth is forecasted to be comprised of 90% low-density (singles and semi-detached), 4% medium-density, (townhouses) and 6% high-density (apartments); Compared to historical trends, housing growth is forecast to shift more towards settlement areas between 2016 to 2046. This shift is anticipated to be largely driven by the aging of the population, local desire for more housing options within settlement areas, opportunities in primary settlement areas for communal servicing and continued upward pressure on local housing prices; Housing growth in settlement areas is anticipated to be concentrated in the primary areas of Inverary, Sydenham and Verona; and Rural areas are forecast to contain 40% of all new permanent unit growth. This rural share of growth increases when also considering dwelling unit conversions from permanent to seasonal occupancy as well as demand for new seasonal dwellings.

Asset Management Plan

Page 212 of 470 P a g e | 15

2.0 Asset Management Plan, Framework and Methodology 2.1

Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan

The Asset Management Plan Update for 2023 includes expanded details on the core assets owned by the Township that include roads, bridges, culverts, stormwater management assets, and water assets. Each of these core assets groups are discussed in separate sections of this report update.

2.2

Stakeholders in the Updates of the AM Plan

Key stakeholders of the 2023 Plan update include:    

2.3

Residents of the Township of South Frontenac Township Council Department Heads in Corporate Services (Finance) and Public Services Contributing staff from the Corporate Asset Management Team, Public Services Department (Technical Services / Operations), Frontenac County (GIS) and Corporate Services (Finance)

Framework and Methodology of the AM Plan

The 2023 AM update serves to meet the regulatory requirements of Ontario Regulation 588/17 requirements, the Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans and the asset management practices endorsed by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and Asset Management Ontario. Each section of the AM Plan for Core Assets will provide details on the state of the Local Infrastructure ending December 31, 2022, including details on:

Asset Inventory
Profile and Age of Assets
Asset Conditions and Rating Systems
Data Sources
Levels of Service
Lifecycle Strategies
Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Page 213 of 470 P a g e | 16

3.0 Core Assets – Transportation This section of the AM Plan provides details on the number, age distribution and condition of the Township’s core transportation assets including roads, bridges, and culvert structures. These assets in combination carry the greatest replacements costs within the transportation asset pool and carry higher levels of risk within the overall portfolio.

3.1

Asset Inventory

The Township of South Frontenac Transportation Core Asset pool includes approximately 802km of roadways, 24 bridges, and 22 culvert structures (>3m span) serving the residents of South Frontenac. The Township continues to collect and update data on these assets and records all information within the Corporation’s asset management software. Field inspections and condition assessments that are performed on these assets continue to improve the both the quality and accuracy of the data compiled on these systems. The total estimated replacement value for existing core transportation assets (2022) included in this AM plan is estimated at 312.2 million dollars. These values are expressed in 2022 dollars and can be found in Table 3.1 below.

Table 3.1 – Core Transportation Asset Details and Valuation Subservice Major Asset Group Roads Pavement (HCB)

Surface Treatment (LCB Structures

Process – Sub Asset Group Arterial (Class 2) Collector (Class 3 and 4) Local (Class 5 and 6) Collector (Class 3 and 4) Local (Class 5 and 6) Bridges Spanning 3m or

24 structures Culverts** Spanning 3m or

Asset Quantity (2022)

Unit

312,630 sqm

36.361

788,985 sqm

78.392

111,190 sqm

13.296

2,113,808 sqm

106.428

589,707 sqm

32.732

3,041 sqm

33.944

1,624 sqm

11.099

*HCB and LCB Assets include road base. Gravel roads are excluded. **Culvert assets do not include drainage structures with spans of less than 3m.

Asset Management Plan

Replacement Value (2022 $M)

Page 214 of 470 P a g e | 17

3.2

Profile and Age of Assets

The Township carried out extensive research on the age of its transportation assets as part of the 2016 Asset Management Plan update and that data continues to improve over time with the implementation of the new AM software platforms. The details provided in Figures 3.1 through 3.3 show the representation of these assets across each decade from pre-1950 through to the 2020’s.

Figure 3.1.1 – Age Profile – Paved Roadways HCB (Asphalt)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

44% $60,000,000 $50,000,000

34%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000

17%

$20,000,000 $10,000,000 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 3.1.2 – Age Profile – Paved Roadways LCB (Surface Treated)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

56% $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000

27%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000 10%

$20,000,000 $10,000,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Asset Management Plan

Page 215 of 470 P a g e | 18

Figure 3.2 – Age Profile – Bridges Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

40% $14.0 $12.0

26%

$10.0 $8.0 $6.0

13%

$4.0

7% 1%

$2.0

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 3.3 – Age Profile – Culverts Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

26%

$3.0 23% $2.5 $2.0 12%

$1.5 9% $1.0

4% $0.5

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

The average age for each of the asset profiles is summarized below in Table 3.2. The majority of Low-Class Bituminous roads in the Class 3 and 4 categories are beyond the half point in their overall service life. These results are indicative of the deficits (poor and very poor rated roads) for the LCB class in the 2022 Roads Needs Study. Asset Management Plan

Page 216 of 470 P a g e | 19

Table 3.2 – Average Core Transportation Asset Age Major Asset Group

Sub Asset Group

Pavement (HCB)

Arterial (Class 2)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022) 23.7 21.3

Collector (Class 3 and 4)

17.3

32.7

Local (Class 5 and 6)

19.1

40.9

Surface Treatment (LCB)

Collector (Class 3 and 4)

14.7

10.3

Local (Class 5 and 6)

12.5

17.5

Structures

Bridges Spanning 3m or Greater Culverts Spanning 3m or Greater

35.1

39.9

35.5

14.5

3.3

Average Age (2022)

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

All of the Township’s assets are assessed for a condition rating that defines the level of deterioration of an asset throughout its lifecycle. These conditions ratings are initially updated through field measurements and are adjusted annually according to predictive methods that consider the assets age and an accepted deterioration curve. Some assets deteriorate in a linear fashion (equally over time) while others deteriorate at accelerated rates as they get older. The asset condition is based on standard engineering practices for all assets. In this Asset Management Plan update, the Township has moved to include reporting on a five-point universal rating system when reporting the condition of assets to key stakeholders. Assets are evaluated using various methods and rating scales are established that translate to ratings of: Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor or Very Poor. Table 3.3 provides a summary on the five-point scale to support further interpretation.

Table 3.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System Grade Description Condition Assessment Definition VG

Very Good

Well maintained, good condition, new or recently rehabilitated.

Good

Good condition, few elements exhibit existing deficiencies.

Fair

Asset Management Plan

Some elements exhibit significant deficiencies. Asset requires attention.

Age Based Condition

Probability of Failure

Greater than 80% of asset useful life remaining. 60 to 79.9% of asset useful life remaining. 40 to 59.9% of asset useful life remaining.

Improbable

Not Likely Possible

Page 217 of 470 P a g e | 20 P

Poor

Very Poor

A large portion of the system exhibits significant deficiencies. Asset mostly below standard and approaching end of service life. Widespread signs of deterioration, some assets may be unusable. Service is affected.

20 to 39.9% of asset useful life remaining.

Likely

Less than 20% of asset useful service life remaining.

Very Probable

Some assessment programs are focused on identifying defects and/or potential unsafe conditions according to specific regulatory requirements. Other more detailed assessment programs focus on the performance of an asset rather than compliance. These more detailed condition assessments are intended to review where an asset is within its predicted service life and how much service life remains. Often these types of assessments use a decay curve with as scale of 100% (best) to 0% (worst). These major condition assessments serve to identify how the assets are performing and provide guidance on the potential for interventions to extend the overall asset life. Additional details on the condition rating review process for roads, bridges and culvert structure can be found in Sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2.

3.3.1

Road Pavement Condition

The Township of South Frontenac traditionally carried out road condition ratings on its hard surfaced roadways on a four-year cycle for its paved (HCB) and surface treated (LCB) assets. This model became more difficult to maintain over the years due to the significant (and seasonal) resource demands for inspection activities. In 2021, the Township moved to secure the services of a professional consultant to carry out a network evaluation that looked to establish a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) in accordance with Ministry of Transportation (MTO) standards. This review included assessments of Surface Distresses (DMI) and Ride Condition Ratings (RCR) as part of the MTO approved methodology. Study activities were carried out by a two- person review team using the: Manual for Condition Rating of Surface Treated Pavements (SP-021) and the Manual for Condition Rating of Flexible Pavements (SP-022). Gravel roads were also reviewed and rated as part of this activity however those findings are not a requirement under the current AM reporting for core assets. Each asphalt and surface treated road segment in the Township’s asset management inventory were reviewed and assigned a PCI rating between 100 (best) and 0 (worst) as part of the 2022 Road Needs Study. The Township has since corresponded these ratings to a separate five step reporting scale for standardized reporting formats for stakeholders.

Asset Management Plan

Page 218 of 470 P a g e | 21

Table 3.4 – Five Point Condition Rating System – PCI PCI Rating

Description

85 to 100

Very Good

70 to < 85

Good

55 to < 70

Fair

40 to < 55

Poor

0 to < 40

Very Poor

3.3.2 Structure Condition - Bridge and Culverts (> 3m Span) Bridges and culvert structures that have a span of 3m or greater are inspected by a qualified structural engineer once every 2 years and these structures are evaluated according to the methodology prescribed within the provincial Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) dated 2008. The OSIM manual reviews various physical elements of a bridge or culvert structure and an overall Bridge Condition Index is applied. The Bridge Condition Index is calculated as a weighted average of the condition states for each of the elements making up the structure. Since all elements are not of equal importance to the structure, the index is weighted according to the relative value or importance of each element in the total. BCI = Current Element Value/Total Replacement Value x 100 BCI ratings range from a rating of 100 for new assets to a rating of 0 where all elements would otherwise be in a state of disrepair. The Ontario Ministry of Transportation classifies bridges with a BCI of 70 or above to be in good or very good condition and below 60 to be in poor or very poor condition. The band of 60 to 70 is otherwise reserved as a band for a rating of fair. The Township of South Frontenac has developed a secondary five-point scale to for reporting BCI outcomes in a similar manner previously reported for roads.

Table 3.5 – Five Point Condition Rating System - BCI

Asset Management Plan

BCI Rating

Description

85 to 100

Very Good

70 to < 85

Good

60 to < 70

Fair

40 to < 60

Poor

0 to < 40

Very Poor

Page 219 of 470 P a g e | 22

3.3.3 Asset Condition Summary - Transportation The charts provided below illustrate the condition of each of the categories of transportation assets by asset value.  

Hard topped asphalt roadways currently have 64% of the network in a good or very good condition while surface treated roadways sit at 58% for similar categories. Bridge assets currently have 57% of the network in a good or very good condition while culverts sit much lower at 37% for similar categories.

Figure 3.4.1 – Condition Ratings – Roads (HCB Asphalt)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

45% $60,000,000 $50,000,000

30%

$40,000,000 19% $30,000,000 $20,000,000 6%

Poor

Very Poor

$10,000,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 3.4.2 – Condition Ratings – Roads (LCB Surface Treated)

Replacement nValue (2021 $)

47% $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000

27%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000

10% 10%

$20,000,000

$10,000,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Overall Condition Rating Asset Management Plan

Very Poor

Page 220 of 470 P a g e | 23

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

Figure 3.5 – Condition Ratings - Bridges (OSIM)

55%

$20.0 $18.0 $16.0 $14.0 $12.0

23%

$10.0

17%

$8.0 $6.0 $4.0

$2.0 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Overall Condition Rating

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

Figure 3.6 – Condition Ratings - Culverts (OSIM)

33%

$4.0 $3.5 21%

$3.0 $2.5

23%

16%

$2.0 7%

$1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Overall Condition Rating

3.4

Data Sources

The inventories for the core transportation assets were based on information obtained through the Township’s GIS records (end of the December 31, 2022) and estimated construction costs were provided by each class. Information compiled by the 2021 Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) reports and the 2022 Comprehensive Road Needs Study (RFP# PS-P02-2021) were also utilized. Unassumed assets from active subdivision Asset Management Plan

Page 221 of 470 P a g e | 24

developments were not included within these inventories. A summary of the data sources is included in Table 3.6 below:

Table 3.6 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Replacement Value

Condition Estimate

Roads

GIS

Bridges – Span 3m or Greater

GIS / 2021 OSIM Report

Unit Construction Costs (per m of road/design standard) Engineering Estimates / Actual Costs

Based on PCI within Comprehensive Road Needs Study (2022) – Golder Associates Based on BCI within 2021 OSIM Report – D. M. Wills

Culverts – Span 3m or Greater

GIS / 2021 OSIM Report

Engineering Estimates / Actual Costs

Based on BCI within 2021 OSIM Report – D. M. Wills

3.5

Levels of Service

Levels of Service (LOS) are statements that describe the outputs and objectives that the Township intends to deliver through the services to its businesses, residents and other stakeholders. Developing, monitoring and reporting on LOS are all key components of a performance management program which has the core objective of improved service delivery, accountability and transparency in services. LOS can be guided by many factors including customer expectations, regulatory requirements, or operational policies and procedures. An effective asset management plan requires a formal framework of performance measures, targets, and timeframes to achieve targets. It is furthermore crucial that the cost to deliver the documented Level of Service is fully understood. A LOS analysis includes:      

Service identification with the identification of assets involved in providing the services and the stakeholders impacted; Determination of community expectations with respect to services; Determination of strategic levels of service, based on community expectations (frequently referred to as customer levels of service); Determination of technical levels of service for each strategic level of service; Use of performance measures to assist in comparing existing service levels to expected levels; and An assessment of lifecycle cost implications of moving from existing levels of service to expected (desired) levels of service over a forecast period.

In order to meet the requirements of the regulation, this AM plan update will discuss current LOS under community and technical LOS categories, defined as: 

Community Levels of Service: Qualitative descriptions that demonstrate the Township’s customer and stakeholders’ expectations of transportation services.

Asset Management Plan

Page 222 of 470 P a g e | 25



Technical Levels of Service: Technical metrics that translate customer expectations into objectives and performance measures.

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Tables 3.7 and 3.8 which follow.

Table 3.7 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Roads Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the road network in the municipality and its level of connectivity.

Quality

Description or images that illustrate the different levels of road class pavement condition.

Technical LOS (Performance Metric) Number of lane-kilometers of each of arterial roads, collector roads and local roads as a proportion of square kilometers of land area for the municipality For paved roads in the municipality, the average pavement condition index value. For unpaved roads in the municipality, the average surface condition (e.g., Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor or Very Poor.)

Table 3.8 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Bridges Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Description of the traffic that is supported by municipal bridges (e.g., heavy transport vehicles, motor vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists).

Percentage of bridges in the municipality with loading or dimensional restrictions

Quality

Description or images of the condition of bridges and how this would affect use of the bridges.

For bridges in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value.

Description or images of the condition of culverts and how this would affect use of the culverts.

3.5.1

For structural culverts in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value.

Community Levels of Service

The Township of South Frontenac has a Comprehensive Road Needs Study that was completed by WSP / Golder Associates. This study includes field assessments and ratings of all of the Township’s road assets and those ratings are currently available on the Townships website. This study also includes thematic maps of the Township’s road assets which show road connectivity throughout the municipality and will also provide an overview Asset Management Plan

Page 223 of 470 P a g e | 26

of the corresponding road ratings of Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. Qualitative descriptions of Community LOS for Pavements and Bridges can be found in Tables 3.9 and 3.10 below:

Table 3.9 – Qualitative Description of Roadways Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the road network in the municipality and its level of connectivity.

Quality

Description or images that illustrate the different levels of road class pavement condition.

Qualitative Description The road network for the Township of South Frontenac includes over 1,603 lane kilometers of roadway that are predominantly located in rural residential areas. A single tier network of collector roads and arterial roads formerly managed by the County provide key connectivity to a series of hamlets and villages, the latter of which includes most commercial and industrial services. The Township’s major road network provides key service for the movement of commercial traffic, public transportation, emergency services, service vehicles and motor vehicles within the County. The network is also highly integrated into the major networks serving the County of Lanark, County of Lennox and Addington, County of Lanark, Leeds and Grenville and the City of Kingston. A map of the road network can be found in Appendix A1 of this report. Pictures of the typical road class pavement conditions are included in Appendix A2 of this report.

Table 3.10 – Qualitative Description of Bridges Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

Description of the traffic that is supported by municipal bridges (e.g., heavy transport vehicles, motor vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists).

The bridges in South Frontenac are found throughout all rural areas of the Township and provide connectivity for traffic over the many lakes, rivers and streams found in the area. Bridges within the Township serve the movement of commercial and industrial vehicles, public transportation, emergency services, motor vehicles, service vehicles, cyclists and

Asset Management Plan

Page 224 of 470 P a g e | 27

Quality

pedestrians. The intensity of service does however vary significantly by location. Pictures of typical bridges and large culverts (greater than 3m span) within the Township can be found in Appendix A3 of this report.

Description or images of the condition of bridges and how this would affect use of the bridges. Description or images of the condition of culverts and how this would affect use of the culverts.

The majority of bridges in the Township are currently in a good to very good condition whereas the majority of culvert structures in the Township are in a fair to good condition.

3.5.2 Technical Levels of Service Ontario Regulation 588/17 requires the municipality to track two key technical metrics for the road network that include:  

The overall proportion of each road classification area to the overall area of the municipality; and The average Pavement Condition Index for each classification of road.

The Township has included the details on Technical LOS for roads in Tables 3.11 and 3.12 below. Additional metrics have also been provided with respect to asphalt pavement (HCB) and surface treated (LCB) roadways to support local AM initiatives.

Table 3.11 – Technical LOS for Road – Lane-km Road Classification

Lane-km (Hard Surfaced)

Arterial Roads (MMS Class 1 or 2)

76.58

Collector Roads (MMS Class 3 or 4)

916.22

Local Roads (MMS Class 5 or 6)

227.26

Asset Management Plan

Township of South Frontenac Land Area (km2)

948

Page 225 of 470 P a g e | 28

Table 3.12 – Technical LOS - Pavement Condition Index Road Classification

Arterial Roads

Collector Roads

Local Roads

Definition (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Arterial roads under the definition of the regulation are roadways that meet the Minimum Maintenance Standards Definitions for Class 1 & 2 roads. Arterial roadways carry high volumes of traffic and provide a high level of connectivity to nearby provincial highways and major regional roads. Examples of arterial roads are Road 38, Perth Road and Sydenham Road. Collector roads under the definition of the regulation are roadways that meet the MMS Definitions for Class 3 & 4 roads. Collector roadways distribute medium volumes of traffic between arterial roadways and serve a mixture of through traffic and property access. Examples of collector roads are Bradshaw Road, Battersea Road, Bedford Road, Bellrock Road, Buck Bay Road, Burnt Hills Road, Petworth Road, Round Lake Road, Westport Road and Wilton Road. Local roads fall under the MMS Class 5 and 6 roads and mainly provide non-thoroughfare traffic and provide property access. Generally, traffic volumes are low and have limited commercial and industrial traffic. Examples of local roads are Alton Road, Cemetery Road, Deer Creek Drive, Keeley Road, Mount Chesney Road and Quarry Road.

Current Qualitative Performance Paved Roads Only (PCI) HCB Asphalt = 70.5

HCB Asphalt = 75.6 LCB Surface Treated = 70.5

HCB Asphalt = 81.5 LCB Surface Treated = 69.3

*Metrics for asphalt roads (HCB) and surface treated roads (LCB) are not individually required by regulation but have been included by Municipality for AM planning purposes. Ontario Regulation 588/17 requires the municipality to track three key technical metrics for the bridges that include:   

Percentage of bridges in the municipality with loading or dimensional restrictions The average Bridge Condition Index value for the bridges in the network; and The average Bridge Condition Index value for the culvert structures in the network

The Township has included the details on Technical LOS for bridges and culverts in Tables 3.13 and 3.14 below.

Asset Management Plan

Page 226 of 470 P a g e | 29

Table 3.13 – Technical LOS for Bridges – Loading or Dimensional Restrictions Asset

Percentage (%)

Comments

Bridge (Width or Height)

12.5

3 of 24 total

Bridge Loading

8.3

2 of 24 total

Table 3.14 – Technical LOS – Bridge Condition Index Asset

Average BCI

Bridges (In Service)

63.5

Culverts (Span 3m or greater)

66.4

Note: BCI’s are all weighted average by replacement value. The Transportation Association of Canada has a progressive target that identifies that the number of bridges in a network in good or very good condition should be at 85%. This is a standard that the Ministry of Transportation has also adopted. On average, new bridges will last approximately 60 to 70 years and will require rehabilitation every 30 to 35 years. This represents an average annual deterioration rate of 3%. Based on a five-year planning cycle it is desirable to only have 15% of the bridges to require rehabilitation at any given time. This threshold indicates that the system is in a steady state. Using this measure, a bridge with a BCI of over 70 is considered to be in good condition. Locally the Township has 23 bridges in service and one bridge currently closed. Eleven of the Township’s in service bridges carry a BCI rating of 70 or higher currently which puts the local network at 47.8%.

3.6

Lifecycle Strategies

Asset Management Plan

Page 227 of 470 P a g e | 30

d) Availability of funding resources driven by taxation, development charges and federal/provincial grant programs. For further details on lifecycle activities on the stormwater network refer to Tables 3.15 and 3.16 below:

Table 3.15 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Roads and Bridges Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Hard Surface Roads – Paved (HCB)

 Routine MMS Inspections  Crack sealing and mastic repairs  Hot patching and cold patching  Shoulder maintenance

 Use of asphalt binder rejuvinators

Hard Surface – Surface Treated (LCB)

 Routine MMS Inspections  Crack sealing and edge repairs  Hot patching and cold patching

 Use of cold in place sealants / slurry seals

Bridges and Culverts (OSIM)

 Bi-annual OSIM Inspection (Engineering Third Party)  Routine inspection and maintenance as required under Minimum Maintenance Standard Regulation  Clean bridge deck drains and expansion joints (spring)  Wash bridge decks (spring)  Repair wear surface

 Increased frequency of concrete crack repairs  Vegetation removals

Table 3-16 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Roads and Bridges Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Hard Surface Roads – Paved (HCB)

 PCI 70 to 85 – Microsurfacing  PCI 60 to 70 – Mill and Pave or Straight Overlay  PCI 55 to 60 – Cold in Place recycling  PCI <55 – Full Reconstruction

Hard Surface – Surface Treated (LCB)

 PCI 60 to 80 – Single Surface Treatment - SST  PCI less than 55 – Full Reconstruction of DST

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential

Page 228 of 470 P a g e | 31 Bridges and Culverts (OSIM)

3.7

 Rehabilitation and Renewals Guided by Ontario Structure Inspection Manuals  Replace wear surfaces  Repair or replace substructure components, superstructure components, expansion joints, barrier systems and related components

 Develop & implement committed annual trenchless lining programs  Develop & implement committed annual structure repair program

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for transportation assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $94.8 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 3.17 – Transportation Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$8,710,500

2024

$8,627,700

2025

$11,718,860

2026

$8,691,250

2027

$8,103,640

2028

$8,993,500

2029

$9,989,448

2030

$9,734,150

2031

$10,276,250

2032

$9,933,500

TOTAL

$94,778,798

Page 229 of 470 P a g e | 32

4.0 Core Assets – Drinking Water System This section of the AM Plan provides details on the number, age distribution and condition of the Township’s core drinking water system assets including watermains, hydrants, valves, services, elevated water storage and the water treatment facility.

4.1

Asset Inventory

The Township of South Frontenac currently owns and manages one municipal drinking water system in the Village of Sydenham. Water service assets in the village include a surface water treatment plant, an elevated storage tower, water mains, valves, hydrants, meters and service lines on public rights of way. This system was originally built in 2005 and as such represents one of the newer asset pools within the municipality. The Township continues to collect and update data on these assets and records all information within the Corporation’s asset management software. Field inspections and condition assessments that are performed on these assets continue to improve the both the quality and accuracy of the data compiled on these systems. The total estimated replacement value for existing core drinking water system assets (2022) included in this AM plan is estimated at 13.2 million dollars. These values are expressed in 2022 dollars and can be found in Table 4.1 below.

Table 4.1 – Core Drinking Water Asset Details and Valuation Subservice Major Asset Group Drinking Supply and Water Treatment System

Process – Sub Asset Group

Raw Water Intake 400mm (193m) Treatment Plant Plant Upgrades (2010) Storage Elevated Water Tower (1,280 m3) Intake & Water Mains Distribution 250mm Water Mains 200mm Water Mains 150mm Hydrants Valves Services Meters

4.2

Asset Quantity (2022)

Unit

Replacement Value (2022 $M)

0.375

4.911

1.440

1 1,321

ea m

1.646

5,491

3.162

342

43 83 288 229

ea ea ea ea

0.352 0.340 0.879 0.097

Profile and Age of Assets

The Township carried out extensive research on the age of its drinking water assets as part of the 2016 Asset Management Plan update and that data continues to improve over time with the implementation of the new AM software platforms. The details provided in Figures Asset Management Plan

Page 230 of 470 P a g e | 33

4.1 and 4.2 show the representation of the respective age distribution for water distribution and water treatment assets. These graphs show that the majority of the Township’s drinking water assets were constructed in the 2000’s and modest growth and investments in the system have occurred in the 2010’s. The water distribution assets developed in these decades are $4.42M and $0.32M respectively. The water treatment assets are similarly distributed at $6.93M and $1.44M over the same period.

Figure 4.1 – Age Profile – Drinking Water Distribution Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

94% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000

6% 0%

$500,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 4.2 – Age Profile –Treatment / Storage Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

83% $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000

17% 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Asset Management Plan

Page 231 of 470 P a g e | 34

The average age and estimated life of water service assets weighted by replacement value is summarized below in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 – Core Drinking Water Asset Age Subservice Major Asset Group Drinking Water System

4.3

Process – Sub Asset Group

Supply and Raw Water Intake Treatment Treatment Plant Plant Upgrades (2010) Storage Elevated Water Tower (1,280 m3) Distribution Water Mains Hydrants Valves Services Meters

Useful Service Life (yrs)

Average Age (2022)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022)

100 50 25

17 17 12

83 33 13

100

90 60 50 50 25

16.7 16.4 16.6 16.6 3.3

73.3 43.6 33.4 33.4 21.7

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

Updated condition information remains limited on the water treatment plant, the water storage facility, and the water mains. Therefore, asset condition was established by evaluating the useful service life remaining. The water treatment plant, elevated storage tower and water mains were all constructed in 2005 with plant upgrades in 2010. The water distribution system also expanded in 2011 with the construction of the Valleyview Subdivision which included Morgan Drive. The amount of remaining useful life on all of the assets has been updated from the 2016 AMP and has been correlated to the condition rating schedule below.

Table 4.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System

Asset Management Plan

Remaining Useful Life (%)

Description

80 to 100

Very Good

60 to < 80

Good

40 to < 60

Fair

20 to < 40

Poor

0 to < 20

Very Poor

Page 232 of 470 P a g e | 35

Based on the scoring scale of remaining useful service life, it was found that 100% of the Township’s water distribution assets have a rating of very good or good condition. In addition, 83% of the water treatment and water storage assets have a very good or good condition rating. Given the relatively young age of the system, there is a very high degree of confidence in the information and findings. Figures 4.3 and 4.4 below show the current ratings for both major systems.

Figure 4.3 – Condition Ratings – Water Distribution

Replacement nValue (2022$)

66% $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 34%

$2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000

Poor

Very Poor

0% $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 4.4 – Condition Ratings – Treatment / Storage Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

59% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000

24%

$2,500,000 17%

$2,000,000 $1,500,000

Poor

Very Poor

$1,000,000 $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating Asset Management Plan

Page 233 of 470 P a g e | 36

4.4

Data Sources

The inventories for the core water distribution assets were based on information obtained through the Township’s GIS records (end of the December 31, 2022) and estimated construction costs were provided by each class. Assets that were put into active service from subdivision developments were also considered within these inventories. A summary of the data sources is included below:

Table 4.4 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Raw Water Intake Treatment Plant / Plant Upgrades Elevated Water Storage Tower Water Mains

Excel Record Water Treatment Excel Record Water Treatment Excel Record Water Treatment GIS

Hydrants

GIS

Valves

GIS

Services

GIS

Meters

Excel Records Finance

4.5

Replacement Value Historical Cost Inflated Historical Cost Inflated Historical Cost Inflated Unit Construction Costs ($/ m) Unit Construction Costs ($/unit) Unit Construction Costs ($/unit) Unit Construction Costs ($/unit) Unit Construction Costs ($/unit)

Condition Estimate Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

Levels of Service

Community Levels of Service: Qualitative descriptions that demonstrate the Township’s customer and stakeholders’ expectations of drinking water services. Technical Levels of Service: Technical metrics that translate customer expectations into objectives and performance measures.

Asset Management Plan

Page 234 of 470 P a g e | 37

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Table 4.5 below.

Table 4.5 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Water Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are connected to the municipal water system.

Percentage of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that have fire flow.

Percentage of properties where fire flow is available.

Description of boil water advisories and service interruptions.

The number of connection-days per year where a boil advisory notice is in place compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Reliability

The number of connection-days per year due to water main breaks compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

4.5.1

Community Levels of Service

Table 4.6 – Qualitative Description of Water Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are connected to the municipal water system.

The Township of South Frontenac has a Municipal Drinking Water System that serves the Village of Sydenham. This system includes a surface water intake on Sydenham Lake, a water treatment plant, a 1.2 megalitre elevated storage tower, 7km of water main and serves approximately 229 metered customers. A map of the water network can be found in Appendix B1 of this report.

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that have fire flow.

The water network map shown in Appendix B1 shows all of the locations of hydrants in the Village of Sydenham. All hydrants in the village carry a rating

Asset Management Plan

Page 235 of 470 P a g e | 38 of A (1000 – 1499 GPM) or AA (1500 GPM or greater) Reliability

Description of boil water advisories and service interruptions.

The Township has not issued any boil order advisory in the last three years (2020/2021/2022). The Township has not had any water main breaks in the last two years (2020/2021/2022) that have resulted in loss of service.

Reliability

Overall asset condition – Water Distribution assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

100%

Reliability

Overall asset condition – Water Treatment and Storage Assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

83%

4.5.2

Technical Levels of Service

Table 4.7 – Technical Levels of Service for Water System Service Attribute

Technical LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Measurement

Scope

Percentage of properties connected to the municipal water system.

At the end of 2022 there were 229 metered accounts which are connected to the system and an additional 60 properties are in the service area that have access to the service. Total percentage is 79.5% (229 of 288)

Scope

Percentage of properties where fire flow is available.

All 288 properties currently serviced in the Sydenham Village are supplied with fire flow protection. Total percentage is 100% (288 of 288)

Reliability

The number of connection-days per year where a boil advisory notice is in place compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Asset Management Plan

There were no boil water advisories in either 2021 or 2022. 0 Connection-Days/Year (2022) 0 Connection-Days/Year (2021)

Page 236 of 470 P a g e | 39 Reliability

Efficiency

The number of connection-days per year due to water main breaks compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system. *Energy consumption per Megalitre in KwH/ML Treated (Not required by O Reg 588/17)

There were no water main breaks in either 2021 or 2022 that resulted in loss of service. 0 Connection-Days/Year (2022) 0 Connection-Days/Year (2021) 2,399 KwH/ML Treated (2022) 3,077 KwH/ML Treated (2021) 3,295 KwH/ML Treated (2020)

*Performance metrics are not required by O Reg 588/17)

4.6

Lifecycle Strategies

The Township’s ability to deliver the levels of service outlined in the AMP is impacted by numerous factors including: a) Current and forecasted growth within the service area; b) Changes in legislative requirements and the need for equipment to operate in compliance under the Safe Drinking Water Act, Municipal Drinking Water License, Drinking Water Works Permit, and other related approvals; c) Aging infrastructure and the associated need for increased operations, maintenance and renewals; and d) Availability of funding resources driven by customer use, utility revenues, development charges and federal/provincial grant programs. The Township currently contracts Utilities Kingston as the System Operator for the Sydenham Drinking Water System which includes a Class 1 Water Distribution System and a Class 2 Water Treatment Facility. As part of this contract, numerous asset management strategies are applied that include the operations, maintenance, construction, renewal and decommissioning of assets. For further details refer to Tables 4.8 and 4.9 below:

Table 4.8 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Water Distribution Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Water Mains

 Inspections and Flushing  Leak Detection (As Required)

Hydrants

 Inspected and Flushed Annually  Fire Flow Testing (5yr Cycle)

Line Valves

 Inspected and Exercised Annually

Services

 Inspections and maintenance as required

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential

 Cathodic Protection for early corrosion of copper services

Page 237 of 470 P a g e | 40 Meters

 Readings Bi-Monthly  Maintenance as required

Backflow Prevention

 Inspect and Maintain Devices at Tower and Treatment Plant by certified staff.  None

Bulk Water

 Convert all meters to Radio Read (2 remaining)

 New bulk water station at water tower site

Table 4.9 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities Facility System

Examples of Components

Operational Activities

Building Structural

Foundation, roofing, exterior walls, columns, beams staircases

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

Additional / Potential Activities  Establish regularly scheduled Building Condition Assessments

Buildings Architectural

Non-structural building components such as windows, doors, fixtures and floor coverings HVAC, plumbing, electrical, lighting, communications, security

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

 Establish regularly scheduled Building Condition Assessments

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

Process Structural

Water storage tanks

Process Electrical

Generators and electrical systems

 Internal/external inspections on elevated tower on a 3-5yr basis.  Tower drained and rehabilitated in 2019.  Clear well at water plant manually inspected by certified staff. Drained and cleaned every 57yrs). Three separate cells.  Measure station voltage (3-4 years)  Load test diesel generator every 2 weeks  Generator maintenance every 6 months  Check batteries monthly  Reactive repairs as required

 Explore energy retrofits  One high lift pump on VFD currently (2019)  Establish regularly scheduled Condition Assessments

Buildings Mechanical and Electrical

Asset Management Plan

Current

Page 238 of 470 P a g e | 41

Table 4.9 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities (Continued) Facility System

Process Mechanical

Examples of Components Low lift pumps, high lift pumps, motors and valves

Operational Activities Current  Bi-annual inspections.  Routine maintenance on motors on daily rounds.  Check, clean and exercise valves  Routine PM inspections and repair needed.  Pump rebuilds are planned and included in Long Term Capital Plan.

Process Piping

 Repairs are generally reactive  Replacement of pneumatic actuated valves (2022)

Instrumentation Flow meters, and Controls chlorine regulators, pressure transmitters

 Chlorine systems have preventative maintenance  Third party calibration programs on analysers and lab equipment  Regular PM work orders

Raw Water Intake

Pumps and seasonal zebra mussel control system

Filters

Ceramic Filter Media (Macrolite) / Granular Activated Carbon

 Monitoring of intake performance and seasonal organics  Divers inspect intake on a 3-4 year cycle.  Daily performance, monitoring, repairs as needed.  Chemical cleaning of media on 6month cycle  Testing of filter media quality annually

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential Activities

 Replacement program needed for serpentine piping for chlorine contact time – ICIP Grant Program for 2024/2025

 Condition assessments at intake in Sydenham Lake

Page 239 of 470 P a g e | 42

Table 4.10 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Water Assets Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Watermains

 Spot repairs as required – usually in response to leaks  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

 Monitor new and emerging trenchless renewal technologies

Hydrants, Valves and Services

 Repairs as required – usually at stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Water Treatment

 Replacement at end of useful service life

Water Storage

 Repairs and coatings on tanks – outcomes of remote camera video (ROV) inspections  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Water Facilities (Buildings)

 Rehabilitation work as recommended through detailed building condition assessments.

4.7



Operational redundancies implemented with major renewals

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for water assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $1.6 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 4.11 – Water System Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$42,000

2028

$42,500

2024

$314,000

2029

$13,000

2025

$963,980

2030

$50,000

2026

$39,500

2031

$47,500

2027

$37,500

2032

$47,500

TOTAL

$1,597,480

Page 240 of 470 P a g e | 43

Core Assets – Stormwater Management

This section of the AM Plan provides details on the number, age distribution and condition of the Township’s stormwater management system assets including treatment facilities, storm pipes, structures (manhole, catchbasin, etc..) and culverts.

5.1

Asset Inventory

The Township of South Frontenac currently owns and manages numerous storm water treatment and collection systems across the Township. The bulk of these drainage assets can be found in the settlement areas where urban (curbed) road cross sections are more common. Between 2015 and 2020 the Township installed four stormwater treatment units as part of major drainage projects in the village of Bellrock (2), Sydenham (1) and Sunbury (1). The Township continues to collect and update data on these assets and records all information within the Corporation’s asset management software. Field inspections and condition assessments that are performed on these assets continue to improve the both the quality and accuracy of the data compiled on these systems. The total estimated replacement value for existing stormwater management system assets (2022) included in this AM plan is estimated at 10.2 million dollars. These values are expressed in 2022 dollars and can be found in Table 5.1 below.

Table 5.1 – Stormwater Management Assets Details and Valuation Subservice

Major Asset Group

Stormwater Stormwater Management Treatment System Storm Sewers Structures (Concrete)

Culverts (<3m dia)

*Note Inventory in progress.

Asset Management Plan

Process – Sub Asset Group Manufactured Treatment Devices Up to 250mm

250 to 500mm 500 to 1050mm Catchbasin Catchbasin Manhole Double Catchbasin Double Catchbasin Manhole Ditch Inlet Manhole *Culverts

Asset Unit Quantity (2022) 4 ea

Replacement Value (2022 $M) 0.225

0.327 7.140 3.281 199 99 40 11

km km km ea ea ea ea

0.106 2.943 1.789 0.697 0.634 0.232 0.098

29 20 14

ea ea ea

0.157 0.124 3.191

Page 241 of 470 P a g e | 44

5.2

Profile and Age of Assets

The Township carried out extensive research on the age of its stormwater management assets as part of the 2016 Asset Management Plan update and that data continues to improve over time with the implementation of the new AM software platforms. The details provided in Figures 5.1 and 5.2 shows the representation of the respective age distribution for stormwater treatment and stormwater collection assets.

Figure 5.1 – Age Profile – Stormwater Treatment Unit Assets 76%

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

$180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000

24%

$60,000 $40,000 $20,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 5.2 – Age Profile –Storm Collection Assets Replacement nValue (2022 $)

37% $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000

19% 17%

$2,000,000

12%

$1,500,000 9%

$1,000,000 $500,000

4% 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Note: Age on culvert data insufficient for compiling with storm collection assets. Asset Management Plan

Page 242 of 470 P a g e | 45

Table 5.2 – Core Stormwater Asset Age Subservice

Major Asset Group

Process – Sub Asset Group

Useful Service Life (yrs)

Average Age (2022)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022)

Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater Management Treatment Treatment Units – System Oil Grit Separator

4.7

45.3

Stormwater Concrete, HDPE Collection and PVC Storm Pipe

22.9

57.1

Corrugated Steel Storm Pipe

33.4

16.6

Stormwater Structures (MH, CB, DI etc…)

26.4

53.6

5.3

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

The condition rating for stormwater treatment assets was established by evaluating the useful service life remaining. The amount of remaining useful life on all of the assets has been updated from the 2016 AMP and has been correlated to the condition rating schedule below.

Table 5.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System Remaining Useful Life (%)

Description

80 to 100

Very Good

60 to < 80

Good

40 to < 60

Fair

20 to < 40

Poor

0 to < 20

Very Poor

Based on the scoring scale of remaining useful service life, it was found that 100% of the Township’s stormwater treatment assets have a rating of very good or good condition. The stormwater collection system however only has 59% of the assets with a very good or good Asset Management Plan

Page 243 of 470 P a g e | 46

condition rating. This is largely due to the fact that a significant portion of the networks were built in the 70’s and 80s and are comprised of corrugated steel pipe. Figures 5.3 and 5.4 below show the current ratings for both major systems.

Figure 5.3 – Condition Ratings – Stormwater Treatment Units

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

100% $250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

Poor

Very Poor

$Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 5.4 – Condition Ratings – Stormwater Collection Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

49% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000

27%

$3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 10%

$1,500,000

$1,000,000 $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Overall Condition Rating

Asset Management Plan

Very Poor

Page 244 of 470 P a g e | 47

5.4

Data Sources

The inventories for the core stormwater management assets were based on information obtained through the Township’s GIS records (end of the December 31, 2022) and estimated construction costs were provided by each class. Assets that were put into active service from subdivision developments were also considered within these inventories. A summary of the data sources is included below:

Table 5.4 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Stormwater Treatment Units / Oil Grit Separators Storm Pipe

GIS

Unit Construction Costs ($/ m)

Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

Stormwater Structures (MH, CB and DI)

GIS

Unit Construction Costs ($/unit)

Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

5.5

Replacement Value Unit Construction Costs ($/ m)

Condition Estimate Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

Levels of Service

Community Levels of Service: Qualitative descriptions that demonstrate the Township’s customer and stakeholder’s expectations of drinking water services. Technical Levels of Service: Technical metrics that translate customer expectations into objectives and performance measures.

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Table 5.5 below.

Asset Management Plan

Page 245 of 470 P a g e | 48

Table 5.5 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Stormwater Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are protected from flooding, including the extent of the protection by the municipal stormwater management system.

Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm.

5.5.1

Percentage of the municipal stormwater management system resilient to a 5year storm.

Community Levels of Service

Table 5.6 – Qualitative Description of Stormwater Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

The Township of South Frontenac has numerous stormwater collection and treatment systems throughout the municipality. Most of these systems are found in the villages and hamlets where urban road treatments present. Maps of the Stormwater network can be found in Appendix C1 of this report.

Reliability

*Stormwater Treatment assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

100%

Reliability

*Stormwater Collection Assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

59%

*Reliability metrics are not required by O Reg 588/17)

Asset Management Plan

Page 246 of 470 P a g e | 49

5.5.2

Technical Levels of Service

Table 5.7 – Technical Levels of Service for Stormwater System Service Attribute

Technical LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Measurement

Scope

Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm.

NOTE: The metrics from Asset Management Ontario state that inputs for this metric include flood mapping and parcel mapping. Local street and subdivision drainage plans are also included where major overland flow routes are provided. At present, there is insufficient information to accurately report a network level. The acquisition of updated LiDAR mapping by the County, lower tier municipalities and conservation authorities in 2023 will help support development of these metrics. A comprehensive stormwater management plan looking at serviced areas (villages/hamlets) would also support these climate change initiatives.

Scope

Percentage of the municipal stormwater management system resilient to a 5-year storm.

NOTE: The metrics from Asset Management Ontario state that inputs for this metric include the proportion of the system that has been constructed or re-constructed to updated standards. A review of the past Environmental Compliance Approval records for the Township has confirmed that Ministry ECA approvals can be found for approximately 2,455m of the network confirming that design standards were met for the minor (5yr) and major (100yr) events. This information places the current metric at 22.7%.

Asset Management Plan

Page 247 of 470 P a g e | 50

5.6

Lifecycle Strategies

Table 5.8 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Stormwater Management Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Stormwater Treatment Units

 Inspections annually  Test, clean and remove sediments and hydrocarbons

Stormwater Mains

 Visual inspection at exposed ends during catchbasin cleaning

Catch basins

 Inspected and Cleaned Annually

Manholes

 Inspections and maintenance as required

 Spring and Fall inspections

Inlets / Outlets

 Inspections and maintenance as required

 Spring and Fall inspections

 Establish a committed annual CCTV program

Table 5.9 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Stormwater Management Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Stormwater Treatment Units

Asset Management Plan

 Spot repairs as required – usually at the stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Additional / Potential

Page 248 of 470 P a g e | 51 Stormwater Mains and Structures

 Spot repairs as required – usually at stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

 Develop & implement committed annual trenchless lining programs  Develop & implement committed annual structure repair program

Culverts

 Replacements on larger culverts (1-3) based on monitoring programs  Culverts renewed with road reconstruction activities

 Improve resources for data collection to support inventory and spatial records on cross culverts  Develop & implement committed annual culvert lining programs on major roadways

5.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for stormwater assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $0.68 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 5.10 – Stormwater Asset Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$274,350

2024

2025

$43,297

2026

$154,730

2027

2028

$216,360

2029

2030

2031

2032

TOTAL

$688,737

Page 249 of 470 P a g e | 52

6.0 Asset Management Strategy 6.1

Asset Management Strategy

This asset management strategy component of the AMP represents the set of planned activities to ensure that the state of the infrastructure achieves the level of service goals. The strategy is generally related to optimizing decisions with respect to:    

6.2

The replacement or rehabilitation of assets The optimal level of maintenance investment required to minimize the long-term costs of the assets (i.e., does more maintenance result in a longer useful life?) Disposing of assets that are not required to meet service levels; and Addressing Township policies that impact the infrastructure intervention that is used (i.e., does the asset size/design need to change to meet a certain policy?)

Risk Management

The AMP establishes the management of risk as the primary method for developing an asset management strategy. This strategy is to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township. However, these priorities are also adjusted or shifted for financial efficiencies, to create capacity, optimize asset life, as well as external influences. The risk management strategy develops a renewal plan that is based on addressing the highest risk assets first according to the state of the infrastructure.

6.2.1 Probability of Failure A probability of failure was given to each asset based on the condition ratings discussed in the Technical Levels of Service. The probability of an asset failing is not necessarily indicative of its age. As part of the review of transportation assets, the PCI and BCI inspection ratings heavily inform the probability of failure however other assets like underground watermains cannot be readily inspected therefore remaining useful life is considered. Table 13 below shows the probability of failure score that was assigned to each asset based on the estimate of its physical condition and age.

Asset Management Plan

Page 250 of 470 P a g e | 53

Table 6.1 – Probability of Failure Score Estimated Condition

Probability of Failure Description

Probability of Failure Score

Very Good

Improbable

Good

Not Likely

Fair

Possible

Poor

Likely

Very Probable

Very Poor

6.2.2 Consequence of Failure The consequence of failure score for each asset was based on a review of information on the asset such as:     

Risk to public health and safety Duration of interruption of service Potential for environmental damage Value of the asset Council Priority

Table 6.2 shows the failure of consequence scorings and provides descriptions of each.

Table 6.2 – Consequence of Failure Score Probability of Failure Description

Consequence of Failure Score

Very low measurable impact of any kind.

Low/seldom/marginal impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Moderate/regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Major/regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Catastrophic loss of infrastructure affecting public safety or having severe environmental consequences.

Asset Management Plan

Page 251 of 470 P a g e | 54

6.2.3 Risk Assessment Matrix A risk score between 1 and 25 was calculated for each asset by multiplying the probability of failure score and the consequence of risk score. Assets with known safety risks were noted and given higher priority for replacement. Figure 6.1 and Table 6.3 below provide the details of the current risk assessment matrix.

Figure 6.1 – Risk Matrix

Score of 1 to 3 – low level risk Score of 4 to 6 – medium-low level risk Score of 8 to 9 – medium level risk Score of 10 to 15 – medium-high level risk Score of 16 to 25 – high level of risk

Table 6.3 – Renewal Strategy based on Risk Risk Category

Risk Score

Replacement Term

Replacement Years

High

16 - 25

Short Term

Year 1 to 5

Medium

10 – 15

Medium Term

Year 6 to 10

Medium Medium – Low Low

7–9 4–6 1-3

Long Term – regular planned renewal based on condition, age of asset, expected useful life or when asset reaches a higher risk level (i.e., probability of consequence or failure increases)

The strategy to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township should be continued or expanded. The Township should continue to consider other factors when prioritizing asset replacement such as health and safety, accessibility, complimentary asset replacement (bundling assets such as road reconstruction with storm sewers and watermains) as well as upgrades/improvements including intersections, public safety, growth or capacity related demands. The replacement strategies established through asset management software considers complimentary asset replacement to optimize use of resources and minimize disruption to the community. Appendix D1 provides risk rating systems, many of which continue to be in place from the 2016 AMP plan.

As part of the 2023 Core Asset review, all of the asset groups were analyzed and were updates for condition ratings and risk distribution. Figure 6.2 below shows the overall condition ratings for the system. Figure 6.3 shows the same asset groups with the risk ratings presented by area. Overall, the Township has a lower risk distribution in the water Asset Management Plan

Page 252 of 470 P a g e | 55

and storm sewer areas however there is a higher risk distribution of risk in the area of roads and bridges.

Figure 6.2 – Overall Core Asset Condition Ratings Asset Condition 45%

$160,000,000 Replacement Value

$140,000,000 $120,000,000

28%

$100,000,000 $80,000,000

16%

$60,000,000 $40,000,000

Poor

Critical

$20,000,000 $0 Excellent

Good

Fair Asset Condition

Figure 6.3 – Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution

Asset Management Plan

Page 253 of 470 P a g e | 56

7.0 Financing Strategy The Township’s asset management plan total assets for the next 10 years align with amounts in the Township’s Long Range Financial Plan. This is important, as the decisions of the current Council regarding financing of these assets, must prepare for the future costs of the assets. As indicated before, Council must continue to grow reserves now, in order to ensure there is enough funding in place for future years as the infrastructure needs renewal. Further update to this plan to add non-core assets and predict future levels of service will increase the financing requirements for the asset renewals. The current Long Range Financial Plan will need to be updated and consideration given to a larger portion of the annual tax base being allocated to reserves for these projected costs. The current annual capital levy funds current levels of service but will be inadequate in the future beyond the next 4 years.

7.1

Sources of Funding

There are many sources of funding, besides the annual tax levy, and these may include:     

Debt Reserves User Rates Canada Community Building Fund (“CCBF”) (formerly Federal Gas Tax) Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (“OCIF”)

From time to time the Federal and Provincial governments will also announce one-time funding such as the Investing in Canada Infrastructure (ICIP) grants. The province of Ontario is announcing in 2024 the Housing Enabling Water Systems Fund, which may also assist with Financing core Water assets, however if the funding is for growth, like Development Charges, those funds will not assist with the assets listed in this plan. The Township of South Frontenac provides funding for assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. Further, assets are also funded through existing reserves. The financing strategy supports this method of operating by addressing Water and other assets separately. In 2012, South Frontenac approved a 1% tax levy increase, compounded yearly, which goes into the Asset Investment Reserve. This strategy is a proactive way to deal with infrastructure deficit, and is a best practice recommended by all regulatory agencies. The amount of the annual levy increase of 1% will not be sufficient, based on this asset management plan to fund replacement of assets. While it has helped to offset capital expenditures for tax supported assets for the past 10 years, for the next 10, it will not be sufficient, and Council will have to review the annual contribution.

Asset Management Plan

Page 254 of 470 P a g e | 57

7.2

Short Term Funding Strategy

The strategy to prioritize the renewal of infrastructure that represents a high risk to the Township should be continued and expanded. Figure 7.1 below illustrates the 10 year capital investment needs for the Township’s Core Assets using the risk-based approach. Over the next 10 years, the Township should spend an average of $9.7 million per year to address the infrastructure needs (in constant 2022 dollars).

Figure 7.1 – 10 year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs

Asset Management Plan

Page 255 of 470 P a g e | 58

7.1.1 Water Assets The water treatment plant, water storage facility and water mains were constructed in the past 20 years; as such, these assets are not expected to require major capital replacement in the short term. In 2014, The Township implemented a rate change which has already reduced the deficit. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for water infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Figure 7.1.1. Figure 7.1.1 Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total

Opening Balance Expenditures 1,562,158 314,000 1,414,107 963,980 616,425 3,500 779,552 39,500 906,983 37,500 1,036,696 42,500 1,161,409 13,000 1,315,621 50,000 1,432,834 47,500 1,552,547 47,500 1,558,980

Asset Management Plan

Capital Levy 165,949 166,298 166,626 166,931 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213

Ending Balance 1,414,107 616,425 779,552 906,983 1,036,696 1,161,409 1,315,621 1,432,834 1,552,547 1,672,260

Page 256 of 470

7.1.2 Tax Supported Assets Tax supported infrastructure includes roads, bridges, culverts and storm sewers. The Revenues and Capital Expenditures for tax supported infrastructure over the next 10 years are displayed in Figure 7.1.2. Over the course of the next 10 years the current Tax Supported Capital Levy is sufficient to finance the Asset Management Plan expenditures. However, the AMP needs to be reviewed on a regular basis as it presents yearly capital expenditures based on their priorities from condition and risk and further does not reflect the savings from strategies already being used such as pavement preservation and joint tendering. Increases in the annual amount allocated to the Asset Investment Reserve on an annual basis by increasing the tax levy and changes in revenues from government sources such as the CCBF and OCIF funds are not included in the calculations below. Year 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 TOTAL

7.3

Opening Balance 7,842,164 6,877,688 6,671,381 3,751,687 4,190,293 5,835,468 6,861,863 7,620,483 9,171,805 10,745,301

Expenditures 8,984,850 8,627,700 11,762,157 8,845,980 8,103,640 9,209,860 9,989,448 9,734,150 10,276,250 9,933,500 95,467,535

Tax Levy (AIR) & in year taxation

Reserves & Funding

Ending Balance

3,652,016 3,834,617 4,026,348 4,227,665 4,439,048 4,661,000 4,894,050 5,138,753 5,395,691 5,665,476

4,368,358 4,586,776 4,816,115 5,056,921 5,309,767 5,575,255 5,854,018 6,146,719 6,454,055 6,776,758

6,877,688 6,671,381 3,751,687 4,190,293 5,835,468 6,861,863 7,620,483 9,171,805 10,745,301 13,254,035

Long Term Financing Strategy

Long-term investment over the next 100 years must be considered to plan the replacement of assets with longer lifecycles. Buried infrastructure such as storm sewers and water mains are expected to have a useful life of 80 to 100 years and may last even longer. Similarly, newly constructed water facilities have expected useful lives of 100 years. To capture replacement of all assets the full life cycle period must be considered. Long-term investment associated with replacement needs for first, second, and third replacements over the next 100 years were based on condition, age and remaining useful life. Figure 7.2 below illustrates the 100-year capital investment needs for the Township’s Core Assets based on a strategic review of the replacement cost and theoretical useful life of each core asset group.

Page 257 of 470 P a g e | 60

Figure 7.2 – 100 year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs

Based on this review, the existing core infrastructure needs are approximately $8.3 million per year (in constant 2022 dollars) to be sustained using this strategic approach.

7.4

A Living Document

The Asset Management Plan is a “living document” that is updated annually to ensure all core assets are captured in inventories with the respective valuation. Information on the condition of assets will be updated regularly along with the risk profiled and project priorities may therefore be changed at the discretion of Council. The 2023 Asset Management Plan - Core Asset Update is intended to be a guiding document as part of the development of annual budgets and long-term capital plans.

60 | P a g e

Page 258 of 470 P a g e | 61

8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The Township’s Asset Management Plan, relating to the core infrastructure identifies a long-term need of $8 – $10 million per year to renew the Township’s infrastructure for core assets in the scope of this study. Asset renewal in the short term should be prioritized to minimize risk and address health and safety concerns. The Township has taken a proactive approach in addressing infrastructure needs by setting aside reserve funds to minimize deficits, approving levy increases to cover future deficits and investing in asset management software to better understand infrastructure conditions, risk and replacement needs. The Township is committed to maintain an upto-date asset management database and prioritizing asset repair, replacement and rehabilitation. Further it is committed to using preventative strategies, joint tendering and continued investigations in emerging technologies. The Township is in a better position financially than many municipalities in Ontario and should continue to engage in forward thinking through financial planning. The Township provides funding for core assets through two sources of revenue: Water User Fees and Municipal Tax Levy. Reserves are also used as a source of funding. Both in the short term and the long term, the financing strategies being used including the use of a long-range financial plan puts the Township in a position to meet future requirements. Over the coming years, the Township will continually review the infrastructure needs as more information is gathered. The Township will continue to set aside funds for asset replacement, built appropriate depreciation costs into future water rate adjustments, and continue to pursue Provincial and Federal Grants. The strategy positions the Township on a path to ultimately reach a point where the infrastructure needs equal the available revenues.

61 | P a g e

Page 259 of 470

To w n s h ip o f S o u th F ro n te n a c

Appendix A 1

Legend k

Y a r d s a n d B u ild in g s

P a rk s a n d R e c re a tio n

J "

B r id g e

? !

C u lv e rt - A ll F ire S ta tio n

pe or th Al

B y g ro v e

To p e l L n Ln

H ig

S eabroo ke

15 Rd

i ll

Cranberry Lake

CanalL

Cataraqui River (Rideau Canal)

Brewer Lake J " Ln

H e m lo c k H ill

Cataraqui River (Rideau Canal)

River Styx

A llin a L n

Rd C re e k

s ne Jo

e La

ar Jo e s Ln ry in g

D K R ID G E R

P o in t

Bear Creek

W h ite s

d kR rt C

re e

Ln n

re oo

Don M

k lo c ad De

n B ra d d e

ck L

le ja

Ap p a ir

ea id H

Ln n id L

an c le

Rd ea rs tte

R id

n C nso

G u th rie

Rd ng rli

Rd ke La

n yL lle Va x M

A le

f f ic

n co pi O

a rd ack

le tt P He w nn ma u ff Ka

fo ta f

B r in t ad y

ga ss sa as M a Ln

en re G

as L

lle y

r Va D ee

il ly

D u ff R d

Rd rth Pe d Ln

Pin e h a v e n L a n e

istm

C ook L

Chr e

Fry Ln

y L

B a c k Ba

e or Sh

od wo

d sR u nd

G ro

na Ko

Little Mud Lake

T ra v e rs

ew s ndr M ca

woo H a rd

Ln le

ws N a r ro

et m K is

e Rd

D e v il L a k

on ip t Sh

it e an Gr

T r o tt e r

F ire

A rth u r R d

C o rk e y R d

D eer C ree k D r

R e d M a p le L

n L a t im e r R d

? ? ! !

F ro n te n a c R d

D ix o n R d

e Le d

D rap er Lak e R

W ilm e r R d

s id

C li ff

F o u r S e as o n s D r

S ilv e rw o o d D r

ska

sa L ss n au g

Lee

D a le y R d

K in

Syde n ha m R d

p le

sL ld no

o rd

s Bay Rd S il l

G e o r g ia

S a lly L n

R e tre a t

M c c a llu m L n

le e

B la

Go d rd o Co n Ln le Ln

Bedf

L ake R

S ta g e C o a c h R d

e ak nL Fa

D ie r

C an oe

M u r v a le R d

S c a n la n C t

rre

ke oo br er Sh

r tr Pa

tt wi De en

G re

r li n g Spe

od wo ro w Ar

il le L onv M cc Rd

r Ba do Ln u

M ic a a y L n P o in t

G ul l B

Ln n

rL r b le

Ln c o ll

Ln se Ro

M in e L n

t er es D

Su g a r B u s h L n

e dg

S h o re s

se t

P in e

Sun

s D eyo

H in c h in b r o o

F lo rid a R d

Rd t or tp es W

d R

a ig Cr

ro o in b

H in

n S to rm s

ly L

Rd to n W il

B ra c k e n R d

E tta L n

Lake L n S Rd

H i ll

R d N o r th

Rd y re df Go te L n D o uc et

W a t s o n R d Q u a r ry R d M c le a n R d

w ro C

n sL nn

B u c k e rt L n

H ic

key

Rd St Rd E ve rg L n re e n

h o re st S We

on Mo d B u rn e tt R

K in g S t

rth

on R d N o e rs And

Rd sh

K e rr R d

L RD EL

oo ll y w

B ro w n s L n

Ln in e M ca Mi

E a g le L a k e

s Rd

o ld

mp Rd

ee u tl Co

n d L

Ln y rb De

F re e n e y L n nd co

M c garvey R d

L a k e f ie ld

L if

Rd P r in c e s s ! ?

i ld

n L Ln

o er

ts o

Sw a

La k e

n li ff L

R id

er L

is ig

W e s tv ie w L n n tL

w He

Dog Lake

J "

T r i lliu m

ll s

S ly

? !

rn R d

i tz

hb u W a s! ?

S o n n e v e ld R d

A nn

P o in t R d

c tb a

W e llin g t o n

y Rd

J S "

Cranesnest Lake

J "

Rd C ra n e s N e st

B u r n t H il

Creek

? !

! ? ?H a r r is !

Milburn Creek

u ry R d unb

? !

Horseshoe Lake

ts L n

V ie w

Traverse Lake

bR d

Rob

F a cto ry R d

y R

Guerley Lake

Little Bear Lake

Lower Loughborough Peterson Lake Creek Lake Upper Peterson Lake

d R" J Milburn u rn

A b e rn a th

Crow Lake

k Bay

Hart Lake

M il

lo c

Loughborough Lake Creek

L ak e

Ê"J Rd

Russell Lake

ou gh

in t R d

rr a

Pothole Lake

e at

dy L o d g e L n

n Sa

Mu r

Cedar Lake

ix o n R d

g ? !

M e lo

hbor

el Po

rr y

L a r ry Y o

B a rr

? !

Collins Lake

in tL n

Loug

B ay

S to

? R a nd y !

? !

Inverary Lake

! ?

o k ?P B uc !

I d a H ill R d

ern

ÊÊ!?M!?!?o r !?e la n d - D F a ir

e e tf

s n Ea

P ost

Pot Lake

n Rampar U b d e g ro ve L H ig h la n d L n

C la

u Ro

ake

D a rl in

y Fishing er nv Lake C o ? ! d yR C h a ffe

Round R d Lake

L nd

in is h

K e ir R d

R a m p a rts R d

Opinicon Lake

J "

e ll in

id e

Connells Lake

Lower Rock Lake

? !

N oW b le

n D n k li F ra n ge L

Lake

H ic

I ro n B r id

Round Lindsay Lake Lake Garter Lake Poole Lake Long

S le e t h L n ake L ow er R ou nd L

k La

Jo ne s

Spectacle Lake

Hamilton Lake

Upper Rock Lake

rd R d

d R! ?

ta ra B r it

it y

Stonehouse Lake

? !

d R" J

I s la n d R d

d n R

R ke d

Hinge Lake

H e w le tt P a c ka

? !

ld R d G re e n f ie

D a v id s o n R d

Ta g g a r t R d

c o tt

ill

now

nd R dS

iv e

S c o t t Is l a

l Ln

is u

d ! R ? ay iv r

? !

g ac

is h

o in

ke L n

Unk

Mississagua Creek

ia n

In d

av e

M accom

Davis Lake

? ! Goldfish Lake

ic O p in

n La

ir R

J "

Tw ilig h t R d

Rd Rd af Le

in g

tch

in L

T u r n b u ll L n

u n ta

8 th

s io

ye r

tL n

‘N

H o lm e s R d ? ! ? ?! ?! !

! ? ? !

P in

os Mo

B la

ta i l Mississagua Creek tt o n

Tw in

ake

Loughborough Lake

ta il C t

A R

? !

J "

W h ite

? !

Rd ? ! D ix o n

N o rm a n

Lacey Lake

? !! ?

R ic k a rd s R d

O ld B o y R d

Eddy Ln

R ID

h am

? !

Pond Hole Lake

d P e r th R

n Ln

Upper Awada Lake

H a llig a

A c c e s s Freeman Lake

W a ls h R d

T ib D a rl in g L n

? !

t an

Loon Lake

H illto p L n

B u re g a L n ? !

g R id

sL n

? !

T e tt

? R d n! L

? ! Lower Awada Lake D e a n S m ith R d

Sum ac R d ! ? ? A u g u s ta L n !

H id d e n V a lle y

? !

b e ll

N o rw a y

M o rr is o n R d

? R a ilto n R d ! ? !

a d de

S" h a le s R d J

Is la

? !

M cF

ll a

R u t le d g e R d

E le

J "

Spectacle Lake Indian Lake

? !

Big Clear Lake

Ln Buck Lake

J "" J

Crow Lake

Hoga

R it c h ie R d

Harves Lake

o tt

a rb

ir gb

n So Pe rr y

de n

pLn

m Ca

e dr

Lo o

? !

J "

La ke

C le

Slide Lake

Pond Lily Lake

K e e le y R d ? !

Big Salmon Lake

re w s

M c a nd l Ln

S h oa

ra Ln

ille

Brady Lake

D e v il s

n A lp in e L

Black Lake

Bear Lake Mud Lake

9 th

? !

Mink Lake Camel Little Rock Lake LakeLittle Black Lake Cedar Lake

Doe Lake

Christie Lake

tr en

? !

n Tu n d Gibson Lake

Little Clear Lake

nc Co th Rd 10 ke La e o lf d H an na R W

Rd ?il le ?u lv! M! ?!

B re se e R d C lif f

C a m e ro n L n

ls L

Little Salmon Lake

r te

o in

ae ich

Birch Lake

Hill Lake

H il l

FLO

F IS

PE RD

N OU

ant L

h Ln

? !

Deline t H un Lake Rush Darling Lake Lake Little Devil Lake Ln Glassy Lake o st te p Ga Mica Lake L ? it tl e ! Long La J " ke

S h e ila

South Otter Lake

nder

n R

? !

n e L

Arkon Lake

La v e

rto

? !

Rock Little Lake Wolfe Lake Gailhowie Pond

le m

J "

n Rd

! ? F o re s t R d ! ?

? ! Rd

H a u g h to

ro v

B usc

Glenvale Creek

! ? ? !

o lla rd

P in P eC t

? !

Paddys Lake Ar bu ck

Ln out

J "

! ? ? ! ? ! J "

? !

S c a n la n R d

L a m! ?b e rt R d

Arab Lake

o od

Z im S to n e rid g e L n

le y S t

ll be

t a in

To b in R d

r s

B ig B e n

J " k k Ê J " J ? ! ! ? " ? k !

W h eat

? !

ge Rd

G a r te

! ?

Judy Pond

R o se d a le R d

ils

st A lt o n R d E a! ?

Wolfe Lake

? !

ks L

F re e m a n R d

? !

B e lk n a

B u r r id

Lak

V ic k is L

B oo

Am ey Rd

G o rr R d ? Millhaven ! Creek

G a rre tt

s te

ry R d

ast

ls g

? !

B u lls e y e Ln Bulls Eye ? d ! y R Lake ld ? ! Knowlton Lake Eel Ba o u Blakes Lake A ir e d a l e L G n V a n lu v e n Rosedale Lake

n oo

Q u in n R d E

ic e

North Otter Lake

Silvers Lake

a Ia w

Butterill Lake

Fermoy Lake

onw

M c n e il

Eel Lake P h e a s

Blue Gould Lake Lake

McGuinns Lake

Folsom Lake

M a s on Ln

J "

C o tt

Tetsmine Moulton Lake n dL Lake Hemlock Lake oo Clearwater Lynch Lake gw Bear Do Lake Lake

A b ra m

n sL ll e r Se Green Lake

Yankee Lake

Miner Lake

Mitchell Creek

J "

Rothwell Lake

O R ile y R d R e dm o n d R d ! ?

ll L

atr

k La

lt z e rL n

Lynn ? Lake !

Be Sme

ay L n

L o u g h b o r o u g h P o rtla n d B o u n d a

? !

v ie

C H IP M U N

1 :1 8 0 ,0 0 0

?H e n d e r s o n R d !

r t in

a Jo hn M

A lt o n R d W e s t

g La

e st

Sigsworth ? ! Lake M in k T ra p L n Holleford Lake

J a m ie s o n R d

? !! ?

Rd W Q u in n! ?! ?

r A

?B r ig g ! ! ?

? !

? ! me

S h a rp le y

ke Ln

O ld

J "

S le

J "

T im

Canoe Lake

Desert Lake

w a rt

C la rk R d

! ? ? !

n rL

F e l lo

an ?! ! ? H il l R d F re d s te r L n

S te

K R

? !

OO W

I L SE

? !

Ya rke r R d

? ! ? Rd B r a d fo r d R d E a s t ! d C e n te n n ia l P a rk R

W a lla c e R d

W h ite

EBR ST

T r o u s d a le

s ro L m e Pe J a Co

ith

COL

E FR

A EM

s ek

Babcock Lake Pero Lake

? !

p Rd

r t la

k H o lle f o r d Bo yc e R d ? ! k

J "" J

k Rd C o le b r o o! ?

C o u lte

rLa

Garter Lake

n ke L

on W ils n

re d

st B r a d fo r d R d W e! ?

? !

Pond Lily Lake

P o li L n

g s te

S an

und

Potspoon Lake

n poo

J "

den

d P e t w o r t h R! ?

R iv e r R d

Cam

? !

o ft L n

ts Po

w it

p g ro

Long Pond Lake

F itz g e ra ld

r Byc

Ln Ln id e H il ls Thirty G o ld Island Lake R

M Ln J ro o k s "

Hambly Lake

E lle rb e c k R d

? !

W o lf e S w a m

A QU

J "

Pondlily Lake

W h it ty R d N o rt h

e Ln

n ry Rd

D eer Fourteen P a r k H u ff m a n L n Island Lake

W illy ’s ? Spring Lake !

Verona Lake

M a p le D

To m W at s o n R d

Long

? !

Napanee River Napanee Lake

D RD P R C A IL S A

F HU

Yo rk

Napanee River

J "

g un

ic cn

J "

d St ? !

? ! ! ? E a s t! ?

New

l in

n 2 L L ake 3 n n rre r sto L n Fa th e a e n F 41 L

F ir e h a ll R d

Jeffs Lake

Thirteen Island Lake

Bass Lake

McGuire Lake M ille r R d Howes Lake

Ve ro n a S a n d

B unk

B e llr o c k M ill S t B e llr o c k P e p p e r S t G o o d r ich S t J " Depot Creek ! ?

T OR

on Ln

? !

ore

B ay R

J "

? !

k Ê k

? !

" J Ln

o ry

Ban k

J "

F oo t

r R d

Vanluven Lake

le a

F o rty

S n id e

M em

urs

? !

ck R

ake ite L

B e a tt ie

J B e ll r " o

Black Lake A la m First Depot o L n Lake

M e eks R d

C a rr ig g L n

erh

J C la i r " De

eq u

LE N

L ev

la n

V IL CO

L LY

? !

Tre

f e llo w

n Rd

KE N IN

A re n a B d ry R

? !

Go od V ila lta

O a k F la ts

Depot Creek

g le

! ? J G le "

H a m ilt

W ilk in s o

Rd ke

G ile s

W a lk e r R d

C lo w R d

e or

S tru th e rs

B re e n L n

r r id

E ga n

er Ln

? !

Bu ck

R oa d 3

re And

im s L

L n D" Je m

n ? g L!

C am

oov

Bobs Lake

n e r li

a re s

o re

a l lH

Bay Sh

Bay

Doran Lake

B es se y Ln

e ic k

ise

bow

R a in

w Ln

Thompson Pond

Yor

J "

illi p

J "

Fish Creek

C re e k R d

Ln rn s Bu s L n rn Ka

P o in t L n Ln

lly

Ln Fish Creek R id e rs

W est

Bobs Lake

re s C

B u rn s

O ak Sho

k Ln

Lake R d

? !

e r C ro w L n C h a d w ic

sh R o b in

J "

F re a m S t

ll L

H ip

na h

h o re Ln

F is

Low

H an

th S

B ra d sh a w

u So

oo d

ft w

it L

Bobs Lake

B e r trim

S t in s o

S te e le

D ri

B ur n s L n N o rth

B o bs

Ne ado w R

?l la r d L n !

o n to R d

? !

ie r

e on

n rs A lf P a tt e

ff s

? !

p Oc

P o in t

go O pe on

Crow Lake

O a k Blu

C roz

Cam

p Rd k le

H anse n L

B a do ur

W em V in

Bobs Lake Ln

arm

B ra sh

er Rd

Bend

a ti

rke

T ry o

W a te r b o d y

e R Lak

C ro ss

To w n s h ip B o u n d a ry

D w y er R

tLn

P r o v in c ia l P a r k

rk s

R o a d N e tw o rk

Spa

e ll L

e v ie ro k L a k e

W a s te S ite

O M

A tt

li n

M u n ic ip a l O ffic e

" ñ

K ilo m e te rs 16

Page 260 of 470

Appendix A-2 Typical Road Class Pavement Conditions Pavement condition index (PCI) is a rating system that measures the condition of the roadway. It uses two components: a ride comfort rating (RCR) and a distress manifestation index (DMI). The DMI is a visual inspection that rates the road based on physical condition of, and/or damage to the road (pavement and shoulders). See figures below for images of road conditions within the Township.

Figure A-2.1 – Very Good (85 to 100 PCI) – Sunbury Road – Factory Road to Battersea Road

1|Page

Page 261 of 470

Figure A-2.2 – Good (70 to < 85 PCI) – Bellrock Road –0.8km West of Mill Street to Long Swamp Road

2|Page

Page 262 of 470

Figure A-2.3 – Fair (55 to < 70 PCI) - Rutledge Road – 2.2km East of Sydenham Road to Perth Road

3|Page

Page 263 of 470

Figure A-2.4 – Poor (40 to < 55 PCI) - Bellrock Road – Cross Road to Road 38 (Prior to Reconstruction)

4|Page

Page 264 of 470

Figure A-2.5 – Very Poor (0 to < 40 PCI) – Bedford Road – 1km North of Salmon Lake Road to Desert Lake Road

5|Page

Page 265 of 470

Appendix A-3 Bridge and Large Culvert Conditions The Bridge Condition Index (BCI) provides an indication of the general overall condition of the bridge or structure culvert (3m plus span). It consists of an inspection by a professional engineer according to the Ontario Structural Inspection Manual which includes up to 55 structural elements. The BCI is grouped into five categories of Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. Photos provided below show examples of bridges and culverts in the categories of Good, Fair and Poor.

Figure A-3.1 – Example of Good Condition Bridge – Loughborough Lake Bridge - 1.0km South of Rutledge Road (BCI 74.6)

1|Page

Page 266 of 470

Figure A-3.2 – Example of Fair Condition Bridge – Rutledge Road Bridge – 0.03km West of George Street (BCI 65.0)

Figure A-3.3 – Example of Poor Condition Bridge – Eagle Creek Bridge – 2.2km North of Buck Bay Road (BCI 38.5)

2|Page

Page 267 of 470

Figure A-3.4 – Example of Good Condition Culvert – Massassauga Road Culvert – 5.1km East of Perth Road (BCI 92.1)

Figure A-3.5 – Example of Fair Condition Culvert – Colebrooke Road Culvert – 0.9km West of Road 38 (BCI 63.8)

3|Page

Page 268 of 470

Figure A-3.6 – Example of Poor Condition Culvert – Little Long Lake Road 3.2km North of Freeman Road (BCI 41.3)

4|Page

Appendix B1

Ki lom eters 5

Sydenham Water Treatment Plant and Pump System

20 0

25 0

20 0

15 0

20 0

25 0

20 0

25 0

20 0

25 0

Sydenham Water Tower

Distribution System Map Sydenham Water System

Legend . ! G

Hyd ra nt ( 43 )

. &

Va lve (4 1) Wa terma in

Syde nha m Bou nd ary 0

Uti li ti es Eng i neeri ng -GI S 1: 7, 500 100

200

300

Util iti es K i ngst on a ssu me s n o r espo nsi bi li ty for in accur ate o r i ncon siste nt d ata se t ou t in th is ma p pr od uct. Uti li ti es K in gsto n do es no t accep t an y re spon sib il it y for r el ian ce th ere on . Fur the r, Uti li tie s Ki ng ston do es no t accep t an y resp on sibi l ity fo r th e accu racy o f thi s in form ati on , no r is i t re sp on sib le fo r an y ex pen ses or dam ag es in cur red , di rectl y or in di rectl y, r esul ti ng fr om t he u se of th is i nfo rma tio n. I t is th e re spon sib il it y of th e use r to v eri fy ma p d ata i n t he fi el d. S o u rc e Pro vi der:Uti li ti es Ki n g ston ,Ci tyof Ki n g sto n

Uti li ti es Ki ng ston -85Lap pan ’ s Lan e,Ki n g sto n,ON PO Box 790 K7L4X7 -Uti li ti es_GI S @ u ti li ti eski ng ston . com -6135461181

m 400

Produ c er:jdonald Revi si on:1 Revi ewer:J .Ru ni on s Uni ts:Meters Created:20200109 CRS :NAD 1983UTM Zon e18N Modi fi ed:20220907

Page 269 of 470

m xd on \S yden h am Water S ystem _2022. cati o ns_S yden h am Water S ystem Map Ap pli eRu n i u li 2022\Water\J ECTS
02_PROJ S
_GI \I N:

25 0

20 0

15 0

Sydenham Water Intake

! 5

6 " 6 "

LATIMER ROAD

! 5

Appendix C1

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PER TH ROA D

VILLAGE OF INVERARY TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

! 5! 5

6 "

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

S "

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

E ! 5! 5

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

FAIR GRO U ND

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

W X

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

S RO

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

! 5 ! 5

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

DIVISION STRE ET

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

DRAWING #:

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-01

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020. While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

L AK

EE W

ERN L

E EAST AN

D UN RO

AD RO

ROAD GRE ENFIELD

! 5 ! 5

DUFF ROAD

Loughborough Lake

ARTHUR ROAD

Inverary

AND STONE CO

HOLMES ROAD

UR T

Collins Creek Watershed

Collins Lake DAVIDSON ROAD

OR EL A

-D

E IX ON

RO AD

" / " /

Page 270 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM01_StormSewerSystem_Inverary.mxd

LMES ROAD

LATIMER ROAD

Inverary Lake

PERTH ROAD

Cataraqui River Watershed

PER TH R OAD

E E W !5!? X

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

PERTH ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

! 5

Culvert

Road Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

" 6

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

X W W !5 !5 X

R ?! ! 5!

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-02

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

WIL M E

W IL M ER

PERTH ROAD CRESCENT

Cataraqui River Watershed

ROAD

Lower Awada Lake

" 6

Perth Road

FI R EA C

Millhaven Creek Watershed

CESS

Freeman Lake

! 5

W X Page 271 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM02_StormSewerSystem_PerthRd.mxd

R RO AD

LELAND ROAD

Y R O AD NORWA

! 5

PERT

Indian Lake

L AN E

W X

HR OA D

Spectacle Lake

IL L

! 5

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

! 5

ESCENT PERTH ROAD CR

251 - 500 Pipe

! 5

<250 Pipe

SPR IN

! 5

Assessment Parcel

! 5

W X

7 Outlet

5 10

! 5

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

7 Inlet

Storm Structure by Type

! 5

" /

W ! X R

Drainage Direction

Legend

" /

Culvert

SHAL ES ROAD

Legend

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Railway

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

" 6

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

E 7

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" 6

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

" 6

6 7"

" 6 " 6

751 1050 Pipe

251 - 500 Pipe

AD O R N OP INICO

SWM-03

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Buck Lake

ALL EY ROAD HID DEN V

OPI NI CO

RT H

RO AD

RR OA D

Cataraqui River Watershed

Raymonds Corners

D N R OA

H T R E P

OA FR

AD RO

Spectacle Lake

Indian Lake

Perth Road

LEL

A ND ROAD

Lower Awada Lake

Page 272 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM03_StormSewerSystem_Raymonds.mxd

Draper Lake

OT TR

E MAP L

LES ROAD SHA

Little Franklin Lake

Mud Lake

A LE

L DORIS SMITH

AN E

7" S

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

" S

BATTERSEA ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

EA S ER T T

A 7" B S

Storm Structure by Type

Provincially Significant Wetlands

! R Maintenance Hole

Wetland

" 6

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Inlet

Rivers

D A RO

" S

Water Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

W EL L I NGS LA NE

Assessment Parcel

Hamlet

" 6 " 6

Township Boundary

NOBLE LANE

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6 " 6

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe 501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

KELLAR ROAD

" 6 " 6

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0 5 10

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-04.1

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Loughborough Lake

ON GT LIN W EL

Battersea Cataraqui River Watershed

Cedar Lake

EE SB

Dog Lake

LA N

AD RO

A LA NE

N UR

H AT

D OA

Page 273 of 470

W HIA

M OR

D SAN

STREET

SWM-04.2

HID EAW AY

Collins Creek Watershed

ROAD

A ROUND L

Milburn Creek

SWM-04.1

K LARRY YOR

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM04.1_StormSewerSystem_Battersea.mxd

NOB

WELL INGS LAN

LE LAN E

AD RO

DORIS SM

" S " S

NE LA

RA MPARTS ROAD

X LE A

N EA CL

RSEA RO AD TT E BA

H A R A S

W X

T E E R ST

E STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

! 5

" 6

BATTERSEA ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Milburn Creek

! 5

! 5 ! 5

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

" 6

W X

" 6

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

" 6

! 5

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

WELLINGTON STREET

" S " 6

! 5

" 6

! 5

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

! 5

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

BAT TE

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

RSE A

M L IL E RE ST

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 5

DRAWING #:

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-04.2

Milburn Creek

" 6

! 5

7 Outlet

" 6

REET

" /

D ST

Drainage Direction

UN ITE

Legend

BAT TERSEA CROSS ST REET

" 6

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

" 6 " 6

Loughborough Lake

E ON GT LIN W EL

STREET

SWM-04.2

Battersea

SWM-04.1

Milburn Creek

EE SB

M OR

Dog Lake

LA N E

D OA MI

N UR

AD RO

D A O AR E S R E BAT T A LA NE

H AT

D SAN

Page 274 of 470

W HIA

Collins Creek Watershed

AD RO

Cedar Lake

HID EAW AY

A ROUND L

W"S X

Cataraqui River Watershed

NOB

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM04.2_StormSewerSystem_Battersea.mxd

WELL INGS LAN

LE LAN E

DORIS SM

NE LA

RA MPARTS ROAD

X LE A

N EA CL

RSEA RO AD TT E BA

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

W X

Road

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

W X

Ditch Inlet

Oil Grit Separator

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

" 6

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

" 6

7 Outlet

BOYCE ROAD

" 6

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

! R

751 1050 Pipe

" 6

ROAD 38

251 - 500 Pipe

" 6

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

W X

W X E

. ! G

D HOLLEFORD ROA

7 " 6 #

Wetland

X W W X

" 6

" S

Double Catch Basin

" 6

Provincially Significant Wetlands

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! 5

Township Boundary

E 7

" 6

Catch Basin

Rivers

Storm Structure by Type

" 6

" 6 *Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-05

E " 6

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

" 6

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

Hartington

E E

ROAD 38

Wilton Creek Little Creek Watershed

E E Page 275 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM05_StormSewerSystem_Hartington.mxd

BOYCE ROAD

HOLLEFORD ROAD

FIRST LAKE ROAD

E " 6

L BE

BELLROCK VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

W !? “SG!. X

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

" /

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

PERCY STREET

" 6

MAIN STREET

Culvert

STRUCTURE ID: 90007

AD RO

" /

" 6 " 6 " 6! R " 6

K OC LR

Legend Drainage Direction

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

BELLROCK MILL STREET

" 6 " 6

Depot Creek

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm) <250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

! 5

GOODRICH STREET

" /

501 - 750 Pipe

" 6

751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-06

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

! R

While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.

BELLROCK PEPPER STREET " 6 ! 5

LEV EQUE ROAD

RO CK RO AD

RO A

BEL L

Camden Lake Napanee River Watershed

FIR

Bellrock

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

STRUCTURE ID: 90000

" S

" S . ! G

Page 276 of 470

LON G SWAM P ROAD

Camden Lake Napanee River Watershed

MAIN STREET

Depot Creek Watershed

PERCY STREET

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM06_StormSewerSystem_Bellrock.mxd

Depot Creek

E STREET AM ED TR NO

Appendix C1 ROAD 38

W XX W

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

6 "

HARROWSMITH VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

6 R " 6! "

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

6 6” "

6 6 " " 6

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

S "

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Inlet

Outlet

6 " STREET 6 MARIA "

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

6 " " 6

7 6 "

Assessment Parcel

6 "

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

OAD R H M IT S W RO R A H

T REE

Catch Basin

WIL LIAM ST

6 "

! R

6 " 7

6 " 6 " " 6 6 "

<250 Pipe

251 - 500 Pipe

" /

! 5

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0 5 10

30 40

50 60

Meters

REV:

SWM-07

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

6 "

ROAD COLEBROOK

6 ! 5"

ALTON ROAD W

E ROAD 38

D RO A ON W ILT

S "

! ?

X"S W 6 " 6 "

6 "

RO AD

W AY

7 ST

E ET

ILT ON

" /

! R

6 "

7" 6 Millhaven Creek Watershed

Page 277 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM07_StormSewerSystem_Harrowsmith.mxd

PE TERS ROAD

WSMIT H R OAD HARRO

Wilton Creek Little Creek Watershed

AD COLEBROOK RO

7" 6

REET

Harrowsmith

7 #

7 7

RA IL

E DAME N OTR

" /

S "

6 "

GRAHAM ROAD

S "

6 "

OTTAWA STREET

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #:

6 6 " "

KINGSTON ROAD

6 " 6 "

6 6 " ! 5"

ROAD Y R U B SUN

5 5 !

! 5

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM SUNBURY VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

BATTERSEA ROAD

" 6

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" S ! ?# 7

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

<250 Pipe

. ! G 6 ! 5 " / "

251 - 500 Pipe

STRUCTURE ID: 91610

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-08

" ? S !

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

C RA NDY

L AR K R O

ROAD MORELAND - DIXON

" 6

6 " S "

AND STONE CO

D RY ROA SUN BU

Collins Creek Watershed

Sunbury

RELAN D - DIXON ROAD

Collins Lake

IDA HILL ROAD

Cataraqui River Watershed

U WASHB

RN ROA

Bear Creek

PRINCESS ROAD

6 " 6 "

6 " 6 " Page 278 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM08_StormSewerSystem_Sunbury.mxd

UR T

BA TT

ER SE A

RO AD

Inverary Lake

" S

" 6

Sydenham Lake

ST RE E

! 5" 6

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

SYDENHAM VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Protection Zone

IPZ Type 1

! 5

IPZ Type 2 IPZ Type 3

! 5

Township Boundary

Wetlands Wetland

6" " 6

Rivers

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

751 1050 Pipe

Assessment Parcel

UR CH

ST RE

6 " " S 6 ! 5 "

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

6 "

! 5

SWM-09.1

! 5

RD ROA D

6 "

! 5

! 5 ! R

6 "

6 6" "

S ! 5"

6 ! 5"

GE F OX RID

6" " 6 6 " 6R " " 6 6 ! " 6 "

Sydenham Lake

6 " S "

6 "

6 " 6 "

6 "

Y LANE IV

DR IV

Page 279 of 470

WOODS DRIVE RY NT

OR GA N

U CO

Cataraqui River Watershed

CAM PBELL ROAD

STAGE COACH ROAD

Sydenham

! R

! 5

! 5 6 " ! 5

6" 6 "

RETREA T

SWM-09.1

! 5

6 "

SLUMBER LANE

RUTLEDGE ROAD

BRI D

POINT RO AD

" S X W

" 6

L AI

TH LANE

L RT PO

D AN

UE EN V A

N LANE

! 5

6" " 6

WAY

LA N E

D BE

RU N

OAD RR W A L KE IVE ASHWOOD DR

6 "

! 5# 7

" S

SWM-09.2

Millhaven Creek Watershed

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.1_StormSewerSystem_Sydenham.mxd

6 ! 5"

6 "

RUTLEDGE ROAD

ALTON ROAD E

EN HA M

6 6" "

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

SY D

6 "

5 6! " " S " S

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

6 " 6 "

DRAWING #:

6 "

W"6X X W WX

Water

251 - 500 Pipe

6 ! 5"

AMELIA STREET

DE N H Provincially Significant Road

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 "

Hamlet

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" S

MCCALLUM LANE

" S

6 ! 5"

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

W X

SHALLOW LANE

Catch Basin

6" " 6

6 "

6 6" "

H NSTO

! R Maintenance Hole

6 "

Storm Structure by Type

6 "

E U Water Pump Station EN V A Water Intake D ! h RT LA N O P Surface Water Intake

AD " O 6 R T N POI

Culvert

6" " 5 6 !

/ "

Drainage Direction

R 6! 6" "

! 5! 5

NE A L BS B HO

Legend

GE OR GE

/ "

6# " 7

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

SYDENHAM VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

6# " 7

Legend Drainage Direction

/ "

Culvert

6# " 7

Surface Water Intake Protection Zone

Storm Structure by Type

IPZ Type 1

! R

Maintenance Hole

6 "

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

W “6# X 7

IPZ Type 2 IPZ Type 3 Hamlet

Township Boundary Provincially Significant Wetlands

6 " 6 "

Wetland Water

! 5 W X

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

! 5

Assessment Parcel

Storm Sewer by Size <250 Pipe

Road

251 - 500 Pipe

Rivers

! 5

6 "

! 5

501 - 750 Pipe

6 "

751 1050 Pipe

! 5

! W X 5

6 "

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-09.2

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

! 5 X W 6 " 6 " 6 "

! 5 ! 5

! R R ! 5!

L RT PO

RUTLEDGE ROAD

POINT RO AD

SWM-09.1

Sydenham

CAM PBELL ROAD

BRI D

RETREA T

6 " ! R” 6

! . G

6 "

6 " ! R" 6

STRUCTURE ID: 91002

Sydenham Lake

! 5" 6

Y LANE IV

! ?" S

STAGE COACH ROAD

ASHWOOD DR

OAD RR W A L KE IVE

D AN

UE EN V A

6 "

! ?

Sydenham Lake

U CO

Cataraqui River Watershed

! 5" 6

Page 280 of 470

WOODS DRIVE RY NT

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.2_StormSewerSystem_Sydenham.mxd

L AI

SLUMBER LANE

EN HA M

TH LANE

SY D

GE F OX RID

LA N E

SWM-09.2

Millhaven Creek Watershed

WAY

D BE

RU N

RD ROA D

ALTON ROAD E

Fourteen Island Lake

Doe Lake

Holleford Lake

Pearkes Lake

E AN

‘S L

Pond Lily Lake

W IL

Spring Lake

SURFACE WATER INTAKE Verona PROTECTION ZONES Babcock Lake Hardwood Creek SYDENHAM VILLAGE Harrow Lake TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Pero Lake

IPZ Type 2

R OAD

ER O

O RI N

Bulls Eye Lake

Eel Bay

Rosedale Lake

ALTON ROAD W

RAILTON ROAD

Railton

GE OR GE ST RE ET

W IL M

MCCA LLUM LANE

N LANE

JOH NSTO

MO RGA ND RI V E

RUTLEDG E ROA D

AD RO

T RU

Spaffordton

KEELEY ROAD LATIMER ROAD

Inverary

AMEY ROAD

M CA

E PB

AD O LR

LAMBERT ROAD

NE ' O

ROAD

Ca tar aqui Riv er Wa ter shed

SYDENHAM ROAD

ILT ON

Sydenham

ROAD

SWM-09.1

Sydenham

NE A L

Spaffordton

RUTLEDGE ROAD

Loughborough Lake

KEEL EY R O

ELD GR EEN F I

ROAD

Inverary

Page 281 of 470

ROAD COLEBROOK

RO AD

Harrowsmith

Sydenham D POINT ROA

UE VEN DA PORTLAN

HARROWSMITH ROAD

SWM-09.2 Millha ven Cr eek Wa ter shed

TH R NO

E L AN

SHALLOWLANE

K ROAD COLEBROO ALTON ROAD W

NE BSLA HOB

JAMIESON ROAD

PET WORTH ROAD

WIL TO NR OA D

Wilmer

AMELIA STREET

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.3_IPZ_Sydenham.mxd

SWM-09.3 Harrowsmith

Hartington

ROA D

BOYCE ROAD

Perth Road

LA N E

L ELA N D

HOLLEFORD ROAD

Sydenham Lake

ALTON ROAD E

AD RO AL ES

OAD NORWAY R

L A NE

Verona

WALSH ROAD

RO A

ANKER

HO G AN

AD O R

PER TH

BED F OR D

RO AD

CH A LE

GEORGIA

PETWORTH ROAD

ROSEDALE ROAD

JAMIESON ROAD

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

S BAY ROAD

FREEMAN ROAD

NE A L

Lacey Lake

Hogan Lake

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

SIL L

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-09.3

SYDENHAM ROAD

Meters

DRAWING #:

RETREAT

1,000

Upper Awada Lake

ROAD

500

Wilmer

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

R R E IE RO H M IL ITC W R

PERT H

Wilton Creek

Freeman Lake

Hartington

Harves Lake

E B ENJAMI NL AN

BOYCE ROAD

VANLUVEN ROAD

GOU LD L A K

L AKE ROA D

W NE

E L AN

ON G

Lower Awada Lake

ROAD Y A W R NO

OAD R N E

MCF D D E A

L SEY

LIT TLE L

Mica Lake

GRE

Rivers

EVER

D HOLLEFORD ROA

TROUSDALE ROAD

Little Long Lake

LANE ET T

RO Road

Doubloon Lake

AR L

Silvers Lake

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

Perth Road

Knowlton Lake

ROA

Water

Cronk Lake

McGuinns Lake

Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

LEL A ND RO A

Indian Lake

Little Devil Lake

Township Boundary

RO D A

Spectacle Lake

Darling Lake

L AN

ROA D

NI I P O

Glassy Lake

ROOKE R B N OA HI NCH I D

IPZ Type 3

Rush Lake

REDMOND ROAD

R M OO

IPZ Type 1

Blue Lake

NVI

BEDFO

LANE M R Surface Water Intake Protection Zone

Gould Lake

Draper Lake

LLE

Legend

A SH

Deline Lake

Hambly Lake

Hill Lake

D A MAR TIN RO HN

Little Franklin Lake

Mud Lake

CO N

Little Mud Lake Verona Lake

Buck Lake

Bear Lake

South Otter Lake

Verona

STO RM S LANE

Vanluven Lake

Tims Lake

Vanluven Lake

ST R

EET

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM KILDEER DRIVE

VILLAGE OF VERONA TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Vanluven Lake

Road Hamlet

! R Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Provincially Significant Wetlands

6 6" " 6! " 5 " 6

Wetland Water Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

! 5" 6

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 " 6 "

BANK ST REET

<250 Pipe

V ER ONA

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

STREET

! 5" 6

! 5! 5" 6 SWM-10.1

! 5

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

6! " 5" 6

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

38 NE

S LA

Vanluven Lake

AD RO

ROA D

TL SER DE

ST O

SWM-10.1

Verona Lake RO CK

Little Mud Lake

SWM-10.2

ANE ‘S L

LA NE

B LY

HA M

AN E

T BI N ES

HI N

Hambly Lake

M LA E FAR

O RE MO

BELL ROCK ROAD

6! " 5" 6

BRO O KE R

RWOOD

RIV E

A CED

Verona Lake

LA NE

P AM GR

OAD

Spring Lake

E LA N

SILVER

Hardwood Creek

" S! 5

IN CH

ND ROAD V ERONA SA

CROSS ROAD

! 5

Pero Lake

6! " 5

" S! 5

Page 282 of 470

REVELL ROAD AD RO

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM10.1_StormSewerSystem_Verona.mxd

Verona Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

" ! 56

E IV DR

! 5" 6

Depot Creek Watershed

DRAWING #: REV:

6 "

CA R LETO

Meters

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRIV

! R" S" 6 S"

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

SALM O N

6 "

251 - 500 Pipe

YORK ROAD

! 5" 6" 6

RIV E

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

6 "

LE ND

! 5

IV R D E G D PINE RI

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

6 "

Storm Structure by Type

WD RIVE

Culvert

/ "

EVIE

Drainage Direction

LAK

Legend

! 5

REVELL ROAD

6 ! " 5

" S

TR EE T

! R

Maintenance Hole

6 "

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Rivers Hamlet Township Boundary Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

7 6 ! " 5

Water

! R

! R ET

Storm Structure by Type

Road

RON AS T RE

Culvert

SHOR T ST R EET

/ "

ST R EET

Drainage Direction

Legend

WAT ER

E TE

6 ! R"

" S ! 5

CEM

VILLAGE OF VERONA TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

RY R OAD

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

DRIV E

7 Inlet

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe 501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

N ST R EET

MCM AHO N

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 " 6 "

STATIO

7 Outlet

6 ! " 5

" S S ! 5"

GEN GE S T

REET

Verona Lake

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-10.2

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

6 " " S

AD RO

E NE

S LA

SAND ROAD AVanluven N O R E Lake V

TL SER DE

Depot Creek Watershed

Verona Lake

Spring Lake

E LA N

SILVER

P AM GR

ANE ‘S L

LA NE

B LY

HA M

AN E

T BI N ES

HI N

BRO O KE R

RWOOD

RIV E

Hardwood Creek

A CED

OAD

Verona

6 ! " 5

LA NE

SWM-10.2

RO CK

Little Mud Lake

IN CH

ND ROAD V ERONA SA

Hambly Lake O RE MO

M LA E FAR

" S 6 "

! 5

CROSS ROAD

LE P MA

Pero Lake

BELL ROCK ROAD

YORK ROAD

VE I R D Page 283 of 470

6# " 7 AD RO

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM10.2_StormSewerSystem_Verona.mxd

SWM-10.1

ROA D

ST O

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

" S ! 5

Page 284 of 470

Appendix D Risk Rating Systems Major Asset Group

Probability of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Consequence of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Roads

PCI Ratings – Inspections

Based on Road Class

85 to 100 = 1 70 to <85 = 2 55 to <70 = 3 40 to <55 = 4 0 to <40 = 5

Local = 3 Collector = 4 Arterial = 5

BCI Ratings – OSIM Reports

Based on Road Class

75 to 100 = 1 60 to <75 = 2 45 to <60 = 3 35 to <45 = 4 0 to <35 = 5

Bridge (Collector/Local) = 4 Bridge (Arterial) = 5

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 30 to <60 = 3 1 to <30 = 4 0 =5

Raw water intake = 5 Elevated Water Storage = 4 Treatment Plant = 5 UV/GAC Contactors = 5

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Size

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Services = 1 100mm = 2 150mm = 3 200mm = 4 250mm = 5

Bridges

Water Facilities

Water Mains

Culvert (Collector/Local) = 3 Culvert (Arterial) = 4

1|Page

Page 285 of 470

Major Asset Group

Probability of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Consequence of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Water Valves, Hydrants and Services

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Valve - 250mm = 4 Valve - 150 to 200mm = 3 Hydrant = 4 Services = 1

Storm Sewers

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Size

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 4

<250mm = 1 250 to 375mm = 2 450 to 600mm = 3 675 to 900mm = 4 1050mm or > = 5

Manholes, Catchbasins and Ditch Inlets

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Manholes = 3 Double Catchbasin = 2 Catchbasin = 1 Ditch Inlet = 1

Storm Treatment Units

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 4

Mechanical Treatment Unit = 5

Culverts (< 3m diameter)

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Road Class

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Culvert (Collector/Local) = 3 Culvert (Arterial) = 4

2|Page

Appendix E1 - Roads Roads ID

Street

From

Classification

Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban

Surface Type Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt

Maintenace Class Class 3 Class 3 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 5 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 2 Class 4 Class 2 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 3 Class 5 Class 3 Class 2 Class 3 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 3 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 3 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 5 Class 6 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 3 Class 5 Class 3 Class 5 Class 3 Class 3 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 3 Class 2 Class 6 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

1300 3400 5350 500 5850 50 2300 1250 2050 650 700 4750 560 500 1200 4300 1700 5250 350 80 2050 3900 50 3100 1250 450 900 2500 900 2750 750 6700 350 600 1700 300 450 200 1000 100 250 150 400 100 150 100 350 100 200 200 4150 300 400 150 250 450 100 450 50 3100 5400 3600 150 100 900 200 5150 550 850 1350 5200 1400 600 350 450 250 5300 2000 650 500 3300 3600 400

6.8 7 7.5 10 6.7 8.8 6.4 7 6.7 6.7 7.9 7.5 12 7.8 7.6 7.2 6.3 9.2 9.2 12 7.3 7.5 7 7.8 6.7 6.1 6.7 6.7 6.4 9.1 7.4 6.9 7 7 6.2 6.6 6.1 8.9 6.9 5.1 6.2 6.7 6.5 7.8 6.5 10 6.6 6.5 7 7.4 6.7 6.2 6.4 6.8 6.7 5.1 7.2 6.7 4.9 6.7 8.7 6.7 6.7 6.5 7 7 6.8 6.2 6.8 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.2 7.6 6.2 10.4 6.7 8.7 4.5 6.9 6.3 6.7 8.9

8840 23800 40125 5000 39195 440 14720 8750 13735 4355 5530 35625 6720 3900 9120 30960 10710 48300 3220 960 14965 29250 350 24180 8375 2745 6030 16750 5760 25025 5550 46230 2450 4200 10540 1980 2745 1780 6900 510 1550 1005 2600 780 975 1000 2310 650 1400 1480 27805 1860 2560 1020 1675 2295 720 3015 245 20770 46980 24120 1005 650 6300 1400 35020 3410 5780 8370 34840 9380 3720 2660 2790 2600 35510 17400 2925 3450 20790 24120 3560

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐05‐02 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐05‐01 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

100 46 60 68 55 41 64 51 55 63 72 58 61 65 68 46 68 78 83 68 69 60 95 82 74 74 80 74 78 89 81 80 57 65 69 80 82 87 89 85 86 86 88 89 89 90 90 91 93 95 72 73 74 74 81 81 83 90 90 64 79 83 63 75 82 95 84 75 89 73 88 94 86 86 88 78 78 89 91 88 77 80 81

Cost $/m assumed 675 855 855 1690 675 1050 675 550 675 1050 1690 855 1690 1690 1690 855 550 855 855 1690 1340 855 1050 855 550 1050 550 675 1050 675 855 675 550 550 550 1050 1050 1050 675 550 550 550 550 1050 550 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 675 550 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 550 550 855 855 675 550 550 550 1050 675 550 675 550 675 675 550 1050 550 1050 675 855 550 675 675 675 1050

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

877,500.00 2,907,000.00 4,574,250.00 845,000.00 3,948,750.00 52,500.00 1,552,500.00 687,500.00 1,383,750.00 682,500.00 1,183,000.00 4,061,250.00 946,400.00 845,000.00 2,028,000.00 3,676,500.00 935,000.00 4,488,750.00 299,250.00 135,200.00 2,747,000.00 3,334,500.00 52,500.00 2,650,500.00 687,500.00 472,500.00 495,000.00 1,687,500.00 945,000.00 1,856,250.00 641,250.00 4,522,500.00 192,500.00 330,000.00 935,000.00 315,000.00 472,500.00 210,000.00 675,000.00 55,000.00 137,500.00 82,500.00 220,000.00 105,000.00 82,500.00 105,000.00 367,500.00 105,000.00 210,000.00 210,000.00 2,801,250.00 165,000.00 420,000.00 157,500.00 262,500.00 472,500.00 105,000.00 247,500.00 27,500.00 2,650,500.00 4,617,000.00 2,430,000.00 82,500.00 55,000.00 495,000.00 210,000.00 3,476,250.00 302,500.00 573,750.00 742,500.00 3,510,000.00 945,000.00 330,000.00 367,500.00 247,500.00 262,500.00 3,577,500.00 1,710,000.00 357,500.00 337,500.00 2,227,500.00 2,430,000.00 420,000.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 1 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2

5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 5

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2022 1967 1993 2009 2001 2004 2007 1997 1993 1986 1989 1994 1994 1995 1994 1994 1984 1993 1993 1994 2004 1995 1990 1996 1991 1991 1991 1993 1993 1993 2000 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 2003 2003 1998 1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2002 2007 2003 2004 2005 2005 2005

50 50 45 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 45 45 45 45 50 50 45 45 45 50 45 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50

5 20 15 15 15 12 15 12 15 12 10 15 15 15 15 20 9 10 10 15 15 15 3 10 6 6 6 10 6 5 10 10 9 9 9 6 6 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 15 10 10 9 6 6 3 10 6 5 6 5 5 3 3 3 6 10 5 3 5 10 10 10

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2040 to 2046 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2024 to 2027 2033 to 2039 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032

2022 2023 2025 2025 2026 2026 2028 2028 2029 2029 2029 2030 2030 2031 2031 2032 2034 2038 2038 2039 2039 2040 2040 2041 2041 2041 2041 2043 2043 2043 2045 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2047 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2049 2049 2049 2050 2050 2050 2050 2050 2050 2051 2052 2052 2053 2054 2055 2055 2055

Page 286 of 470

52150 Bellrock Road Cross Road Road 38 Arterial 56635 Sunbury Road Battersea Road Battersea Road Arterial 54910 Road 38 Murton Road 0.50km South of Kingsto Arterial Arterial 55025 Road 38 0.50km South of Kingston Kingston Road Arterial 56520 Rutledge Road 2.20km East of SydenhamPerth Road 10 46360 Walker Street Verona Street Road 38 Local Arterial 50500 Battersea Road 0.10km North of Sarah StrBurnt Hills Road Local 45685 Verona Sand Road 0.70km East of Cross RoadMcMahon Drive 58935 Yarker Road 4 Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Arterial 46000 Stage Coach Road Campbell Road Rutledge Road Collector 53760 Perth Road 10 Moreland Dixon Road 0.70km North of Morela Arterial 55255 Road 38 0.56km North of Harrows 0.70km North of Harrow Arterial 55175 Road 38 Harrowsmith Road 0.56km North of Harrow Arterial 55600 Road 38 Pine Ridge Road Desert Lake Road Arterial 55485 Road 38 Verona Sand Road Pine Ridge Road Arterial 50000 Battersea Road 4.3km South of Moreland Moreland Dixon Road Arterial 40915 Burridge Road Westport Road Green Bay Road Local 57440 Sydenham Road Orser Road 1.45km North of Keeley Arterial 57555 Sydenham Road 1.45km North of Keeley R Rutledge Road Arterial 55150 Road 38 Wilton Road 18 Harrowsmith Road Arterial 50375 Battersea Road Larry York Road Sarah Street Arterial 55370 Road 38 0.70km North of Harrows Verona Sand Road Arterial Local 46712 Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent 55715 Road 38 Desert Lake Road 0.80km North of Snider RArterial 40630 Bradshaw Road Bob’s Lake Road Steele Road Local 43765 Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Round Lake Road Local 40615 Bradshaw Road Road 38 Bob’s Lake Road Local 54220 Perth Road 10 1.40km North of Perth Ro 3.90km North of Perth R Arterial 46330 Verona Street Verona Sand Road North End of Road Local 56405 Rutledge Road Storm Haven Lane 2.20km East of SydenhamArterial Arterial 55830 Road 38 0.80km North of Snider RoPiccadilly Road 54450 Perth Road 10 4.10km North of Perth Ro 9.60km North of Perth R Arterial 44740 Notre Dame Street 0.35km South of Centenn Park Street Local 42850 Hinchinbrooke Road Road 38 0.2km North of Road 38 Local Local 43750 Latimer Road 1.70km West of Perth RoaPerth Road 10 43495 Kingston Road Road 38 Harrowsmith Road Local 41140 Carlton Drive Road 38 Cemetery Road Local 42460 George Street Wheatley Street Portland Avenue Arterial Arterial 9.60km North of Perth Ro Roushorn Road 54460 Perth Road 10 45625 Salmon Drive Lakeview Drive East End of Road Local 44320 McMahon Drive Verona Sand Road Bank Street Local Local 45145 Princess Road 0.15km West of BatterseaBattersea Road 46120 Sydenham Church Street William Street Portland Avenue Local 44140 Maria Street Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local 43645 Lakeview Drive Salmon Drive Pine Ridge Road Local Road 38 Local 41290 Church Street (Harrowsmit Notre Dame Street 44710 Notre Dame Street Colebrook Road Church Street (HarrowsmLocal 44935 Ottawa Street Railway Street North End of Road Local 46645 William Street Rutledge Road Church Street (SydenhamLocal East End of Road Local 41305 Church Street (Harrowsmit Road 38 53530 Moreland Dixon Road Perth Road 10 Battersea Road Arterial 41965 Division Street Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local 40285 Bank Street Road 38 Revell Road Local 46465 Water Street Road 38 East End of Road Local 45700 Verona Sand Road McMahon Drive Road 38 Local 45085 Pine Ridge Road Road 38 East End of Road Local Road 38 East End of Road Local 42430 Genge Street 41680 Davey Drive South End of Road Maple Drive Local 41200 Cemetery Road Water Street North End of Road Local 53875 Perth Road 10 0.70km North of Morelan North Shore Crescent Arterial 53645 Perth Road 10 Spooner Road Moreland Dixon Road Arterial 53415 Harrowsmith Road 0.45km East of Road 38 Loughborough Portland Arterial 41215 Centennial Park Road Notre Dame Street Road 38 Local Local 44925 Orser Road 1.20km East of Stage CoacSydenham Road 45115 Portland Avenue Sydenham Church Street George Street Local 40690 Brewery Street William Street Sydenham Mill Street Local 54795 Perth Road 10 0.85km North of McComis6.00km North of McComArterial 44095 Maple Drive Road 38 East End of Road Local 54790 Perth Road 10 McComish Lane 0.85km North of McComArterial 42280 Four Seasons Drive Holmes Road North End of Road Local 50250 Battersea Road Sunbury Road Larry York Road Arterial 56060 Rutledge Road Loughborough Portland R 0.13km West of SydenhaArterial 42295 Fox Ridge Trail West End of Road East End of Road Local 44725 Notre Dame Street Church Street (Harrowsm 0.35km South of CentennLocal 41800 Deer Run Way Fox Ridge Trail Bedford Road Local 45100 Point Road Wheatley Street East End of Road Local 53990 Perth Road 10 North Shore Crescent Perth Road Crescent Arterial 57325 Sydenham Road Horning Road 2.0km North of Horning Arterial 46390 Walsh Road Perth Road 10 0.15km East of Perth Ro Local 54565 Perth Road 10 Roushorn Road Clear Lake Road Arterial 55945 Road 38 Bradshaw Road 3.30km North of BradshaArterial Arterial 58590 Wilton Road 18 3.6km West of Yarker RoaYarker Road 4 57210 Sydenham Mill Street Rutledge Road George Street Arterial

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Urban Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Urban Urban Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 3 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 5 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 3 Class 3 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 3 Class 6 Class 6 Class 3 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 3 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 3 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

550 150 50 500 200 150 3350 3050 350 350 300 400 500 1100 680 200 200 400 2100 300 150 150 2100 3200 200 800 1400 600 250 50 100 560 100 260 240 3750 1100 250 450 250 100 550 100 100 3300 1300 450 280 120 100 1000 120 250 500 450 2200 1700 600 2700 4000 3600 2650 150 600 400 450 1200 2500 3750 1300 2950 1400 2200 100 3200 2900 2900 1600 700 2200 150 1300 2100 900 2200 500

7.8 7.8 6.3 7.8 8.4 6.1 6.8 6.2 6.4 6.5 7.7 6 6 7.3 5.5 5.5 6.7 6 10 7.5 7.7 6.3 10 7 7 12.5 10 7 7 6.5 7 6 6.4 6 6 10 10.4 3.2 4.2 5 3.7 10.4 4 3.2 6.7 9.1 7 12 8 6 7.7 11 8 7.3 6 6.7 6.4 6.4 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 6 4.3 4.5 6 6.5 6.8 5 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.1 5.1 7 6.6 6.3 6.6 7 6.2 2.8 7 6.1 4.8 6.5 4.7

4290 1170 315 3900 1680 915 22780 18910 2240 2275 2310 2400 3000 8030 3740 1100 1340 2400 21000 2250 1155 945 21000 22400 1400 10000 14000 4200 1750 325 700 3360 640 1560 1440 37500 11440 800 1890 1250 370 5720 400 320 22110 11830 3150 3360 960 600 7700 1320 2000 3650 2700 14740 10880 3840 15120 22800 23040 16430 900 2580 1800 2700 7800 17000 18750 8190 18290 8960 13420 510 22400 19140 18270 10560 4900 13640 420 9100 12810 4320 14300 2350

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐01 2022‐05‐01 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐05‐03 2022‐05‐02 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

76 92 89 91 89 90 81 80 82 80 86 86 62 69 89 74 85 88 88 96 87 89 90 65 87 68 74 89 92 92 92 91 92 94 95 83 83 80 80 82 84 89 86 87 64 74 84 84 75 82 86 89 93 96 90 29 38 44 30 42 45 30 40 48 53 57 75 54 23 33 37 45 41 50 62 44 46 49 72 35 38 63 42 47 60 47

Cost $/m assumed 1050 1050 550 1050 1050 1050 675 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 675 550 675 550 1050 550 675 675 550 1690 675 1050 1050 1050 1050 550 1050 550 550 675 1340 550 1050 1050 550 1340 550 550 675 550 1340 1340 1050 1050 1050 1340 1340 1340 550 450 450 450 270 270 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 270 270 450 375 270 270 855 270 270 270 855 450 270 855 270 270 270 270

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

577,500.00 157,500.00 27,500.00 525,000.00 210,000.00 157,500.00 2,261,250.00 1,677,500.00 192,500.00 192,500.00 165,000.00 220,000.00 275,000.00 605,000.00 374,000.00 110,000.00 135,000.00 220,000.00 1,417,500.00 165,000.00 157,500.00 82,500.00 1,417,500.00 2,160,000.00 110,000.00 1,352,000.00 945,000.00 630,000.00 262,500.00 52,500.00 105,000.00 308,000.00 105,000.00 143,000.00 132,000.00 2,531,250.00 1,474,000.00 137,500.00 472,500.00 262,500.00 55,000.00 737,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 2,227,500.00 715,000.00 603,000.00 375,200.00 126,000.00 105,000.00 1,050,000.00 160,800.00 335,000.00 670,000.00 247,500.00 990,000.00 765,000.00 270,000.00 729,000.00 1,080,000.00 1,620,000.00 715,500.00 40,500.00 162,000.00 108,000.00 121,500.00 324,000.00 1,125,000.00 1,012,500.00 351,000.00 1,327,500.00 525,000.00 594,000.00 27,000.00 2,736,000.00 783,000.00 783,000.00 432,000.00 598,500.00 990,000.00 40,500.00 1,111,500.00 567,000.00 243,000.00 594,000.00 135,000.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 2 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 5 5 3 4 4 3 4

3 5 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 5 4 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2012 2012 2018 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2003 2007 2007 2003 2007 2007 2014 2000 2003 2004 1995 2014 2008 2004 2007 2004 2004 2007 1995 2011 2000 2001 2011 2003 1992 1990 2003 2009 1997 2007 2011

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 45 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 50 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

6 5 4 4 3 3 10 6 6 6 5 3 9 9 3 6 5 3 5 4 3 3 5 15 3 15 10 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 10 6 6 6 6 5 3 3 15 10 10 10 8 6 5 5 5 5 3 25 25 20 15 12 20 15 12 12 12 9 6 20 15 15 25 16 12 12 15 12 12 12 10 25 15 15 12 12 9 12

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2028 to 2032 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2023 2023 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2023 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2023 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2028 to 2032

2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2056 2056 2056 2057 2057 2057 2058 2058 2058 2059 2059 2059 2060 2060 2060 2060 2061 2062 2062 2063 2063 2063 2063 2063 2063 2064 2064 2064 2064 2065 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2068 2022 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2024 2025 2025 2025 2026 2026 2026 2026 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2028 2029

Page 287 of 470

46540 Wheatley Street Rutledge Road George Street Local 42445 George Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street Arterial 45265 Railton Road Sydenham Road 0.05km East of SydenhamCollector 46180 Sydenham William Street Rutledge Road Sydenham Mill Street Collector 40060 Amelia Street Brewery Street William Street Local 46135 Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Mill Street Wheatley Street Local 51805 Bellrock Road West End of Road Bellrock Mill Street Arterial 44755 Oak Bluffs Road South End of Road Alf Patterson Road Local 42710 Grey Owl Road Oak Bluffs Road South End of Road Local 41110 Canoe Lake Road 3.0km South of Westport 3.4km South of Westpor Local 51230 Bedford Road 1.2km North of Freeman R1.5km North of FreemanArterial 42105 Fawn Brook Drive Spooner Road 0.40km North of Spoone Local 41020 Canoe Lake Road 0.8km North of Desert Lak1.3km North of Desert LaLocal 41455 Colebrook Road 5.30km East of Camden P Road 38 Local 40525 Boyce Road 0.7km West of Road 38 Road 38 Local 40705 Buck Bay Road Westport Road 0.3km North of Westpor Local 54335 Perth Road 10 3.90km North of Perth Ro 4.10km North of Perth R Arterial 46165 Sydenham Walker Road Rock Quarry Lane Sydenham Church StreetLocal 54680 Perth Road 10 Clear Lake Road McComish Lane Arterial 43360 Keeley Road Sydenham Road 0.3km East of Sydenham Collector 42970 Holleford Road Road 38 0.15km East of Road 38 Local 45070 Piccadilly Road Road 38 Arena Boundary Road Local 51920 Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Long Swamp Road Arterial 52035 Bellrock Road Long Swamp Road Cross Road Arterial 45730 Sarah Street Water Street Battersea Road Local 55140 Road 38 Kingston Road Wilton Road 18 Arterial 54105 Perth Road 10 Perth Road Crescent 1.40km North of Perth R Arterial 44995 Perth Road Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local 46495 Wellington Street Battersea Road United Street Local Local 46710 Wilmer Road 0.05km West of Perth RoaPerth Road 10 40345 Battersea Water Street North End of Road Battersea Road Local Local 41788 Deer Creek Drive 0.4km North of Spooner RWhitetail Court 40315 Battersea Cross Street Wellington Street Battersea Road Local Local 42108 Fawn Brook Drive 0.4km North of Spooner RWhitetail Court 46545 Whitetail Court Fawn Brook Drive North End of Road Local 58820 Yarker Road 4 Camden Portland Bounda Wilton Road 18 Arterial 56290 Rutledge Road Wheatley Street Storm Haven Lane Arterial 44980 Percy Street Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local 44065 Main Street Bellrock Road Bellrock Mill Street Local 40435 Bellrock Mill Street Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local Percy Street Main Street Local 42520 Goodrich Street Arterial 56175 Rutledge Road 0.13km West of SydenhamWheatley Street 43855 Leveque Road Bellrock Mill Street 0.1km North of Bellrock Local 40465 Bellrock Pepper Street Bellrock Road First Lake Road Local 58705 Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 0.65km West of Road 38 Arterial 58130 Westport Road 1.10km East of Lee Road 0.76km West of Bressee Arterial 53400 Harrowsmith Road Road 38 0.45km East of Road 38 Arterial 58725 Wilton Road 18 0.65km West of Road 38 0.37km West of Road 38 Arterial 0 Robinson Road Wilton Road 18 Colebrook Road Collector 41470 Colebrook Road East Road 38 Kingston Road Local 51000 Bedford Road Portland Avenue Alton Road Arterial 58775 Wilton Road 18 0.12km West of Road 38 Road 38 Arterial 58750 Wilton Road 18 0.37km West of Road 38 0.12km West of Road 38 Arterial 50125 Battersea Road Moreland Dixon Road Sunbury Road Arterial 40180 Arena Boundary Road 2.15km East of Davey Rd Piccadilly Road Local 40030 Battersea Road 2.30km North of Burnt Hi 4.5km North of Burnt Hil Arterial 44665 Battersea Road Burnt Hills Road 1.70km North of Burnt HArterial 50675 Battersea Road 1.70km North of Burnt Hi 2.30km North of Burnt HArterial 51690 Alton Road Road 38 Loughborough Portland Local 44890 North Shore Road Hewlett Packard Road Convery Lane Local Arterial 42655 Bedford Road 1.0km North of Salmon LaDesert Lake Road 43435 Ormsbee Road Milburn Road East End of Road Local 46240 Greenfield Road West End of Road 0.70km West of Perth RoLocal 45945 Kerr Road Petworth Road North End of Road Local 44920 Tom Watson Road West End of Road Watson Road Local Local 58015 Spooner Road 0.45km West of Perth RoaPerth Road 10 41575 Orser Road Stage Coach Road 1.20km East of Stage CoaLocal 42235 Westport Road 0.20km East of Burridge R1.10km East of Lee Road Arterial 52495 Craig Road Road 38 3.75km North of Road 38Local 43975 Florida Road 1.30km South of Henders Henderson Road Local 45595 Desert Lake Road Road 38 0.15km West of High Fal Arterial Alton Road Collector 42025 Loughborough Portland RoHarrowsmith Road Local 56750 Round Lake Road 4.10km East of Latimer RoBattersea Road 43030 Easy Street West End of Road Road 38 Local 43735 Sunbury Road 0.60km West of Factory R0.65km West of HitchcocArterial 43045 Holleford Road New Morin Road Johnny Martin Road Local 51115 Latimer Road Davidson Road 1.70km West of Perth RoLocal 40330 Holleford Road Johnny Martin Road Deer Park Lane Local Arterial 44515 Sunbury Road 0.65km West of HitchcockHitchcock Drive 42535 Bedford Road Alton Road Freeman Road Arterial 44905 Battersea Mill Street Battersea Road South End of Road Local 56865 Sunbury Road Brewer Lake Road 1.30km East of HitchcockArterial 43930 Long Swamp Road German Road 2.05km South of BellrockLocal 45475 Gorr Road Road 38 East End of Road Local Local 43375 Keeley Road 0.3km East of Sydenham RPark Valley Road 42580 Graham Road Park Street West End of Road Local

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Surface Type Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

2300 2400 2100 1400 1550 1600 1950 1350 1900 550 1550 1350 700 250 1400 1400 800 150 300 800 1550 200 1300 1850 900 300 1500 1700 100 1600 550 100 1300 650 500 2300 2200 2500 3700 1600 900 1000 1800 900 950 1900 1500 800 2850 1500 200 900 3550 800 100 1400 400 1550 3400 400 700 300 1700 360 1350 3250 1250 2200 2250 1000 1350 400 1200 1900 700 700 700 2900 2000 1000 250 200 2150 950 1350 1000

5.6 6.1 6.5 7 5.9 5.9 6.2 5.9 6.1 4.5 3.9 6.5 6.5 4 6 5.5 3.8 5.8 3.6 5.4 5.6 7.2 6.1 5.9 6.5 6.4 6.4 5.7 4 6.5 6.4 5 6.4 5.5 5.5 6 6.5 5.7 6 6.1 5.5 6.4 6.1 6.4 4.9 4.6 5.5 5.3 5.6 5.3 3 3.8 6.3 5.8 4.5 6.5 5.8 6.5 6.6 5 6.2 6.7 6.2 6.9 6.2 6.7 6.7 5 6.1 6.3 6.3 6 6 5.2 6.7 6 5.4 6.3 6.7 6 6.4 4.7 6 6.4 6.7 5.4

12880 14640 13650 9800 9145 9440 12090 7965 11590 2475 6045 8775 4550 1000 8400 7700 3040 870 1080 4320 8680 1440 7930 10915 5850 1920 9600 9690 400 10400 3520 500 8320 3575 2750 13800 14300 14250 22200 9760 4950 6400 10980 5760 4655 8740 8250 4240 15960 7950 600 3420 22365 4640 450 9100 2320 10075 22440 2000 4340 2010 10540 2484 8370 21775 8375 11000 13725 6300 8505 2400 7200 9880 4690 4200 3780 18270 13400 6000 1600 940 12900 6080 9045 5400

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

51 53 54 71 50 53 57 55 52 53 53 58 64 69 59 55 58 60 79 80 82 84 65 55 58 61 62 62 63 66 59 55 75 68 69 70 73 80 80 77 70 71 72 73 76 78 78 78 79 79 80 82 83 83 84 90 90 93 55 69 77 89 55 66 83 88 90 55 63 68 85 90 54 68 74 57 56 58 62 68 74 77 64 75 80 76

Cost $/m assumed 270 270 270 855 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 375 375 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 1050 270 270 270 375 375 375 375 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 550 270 270 550 270 450 270 270 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 375 270 270

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

621,000.00 648,000.00 567,000.00 1,197,000.00 418,500.00 432,000.00 526,500.00 364,500.00 513,000.00 148,500.00 418,500.00 506,250.00 262,500.00 67,500.00 378,000.00 378,000.00 216,000.00 40,500.00 81,000.00 216,000.00 418,500.00 54,000.00 351,000.00 499,500.00 243,000.00 81,000.00 405,000.00 459,000.00 27,000.00 432,000.00 148,500.00 105,000.00 351,000.00 175,500.00 135,000.00 862,500.00 825,000.00 937,500.00 1,387,500.00 432,000.00 243,000.00 270,000.00 486,000.00 243,000.00 256,500.00 513,000.00 405,000.00 216,000.00 769,500.00 405,000.00 54,000.00 243,000.00 958,500.00 440,000.00 27,000.00 378,000.00 220,000.00 418,500.00 1,530,000.00 108,000.00 189,000.00 135,000.00 459,000.00 97,200.00 364,500.00 877,500.00 337,500.00 594,000.00 607,500.00 270,000.00 364,500.00 108,000.00 324,000.00 513,000.00 189,000.00 189,000.00 189,000.00 783,000.00 540,000.00 270,000.00 67,500.00 54,000.00 580,500.00 356,250.00 364,500.00 270,000.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 4 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2

3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2014 2004 2007 2012 2011 2007 2007 2011 2007 2009 2009 2004 2004 1998 2001 2003 1995 1990 1999 2001 2001 2001 2000 1996 1996 1997 1995 1996 1995 2003 2004 2005 2002 2003 2003 1992 1995 1993 2003 2001 2003 2003 2003 2003 1993 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 1992 2003 2003 1992 2003 2018 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 1998 1998 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1998 2008 2000 1995 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2000 2002

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

12 12 12 10 12 12 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 9 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 15 9 6 5 9 9 6 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 12 9 6 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 8 6 6

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046

2029 2029 2029 2029 2030 2030 2030 2030 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2031 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2032 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2033 2034 2034 2034 2034 2035 2035 2035 2035 2036 2037 2037 2037 2037 2037 2038 2038 2038 2039 2039 2039 2039 2039 2039 2039 2040 2040 2040 2040

Page 288 of 470

43315 Jamieson Road 1.30km East of Road 38 Loughborough Portland Local 43990 Vanluven Road Holleford Road Loughborough Portland Local 45640 Salmon Lake Road Bedford Road North End of Road Local Hitchcock Drive Brewer Lake Road Arterial 57095 Sunbury Road 40540 Bracken Road Yarker Road 4 Mclean Road Local 42760 Henderson Road Wilton Road 18 Yarker Road 4 Local 42340 Freeman Road Gould Lake Road Bedford Road Local 44305 Mclean Road Wallace Road Colebrook Road Local 42265 Forest Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Local 41590 Cross Road Bellrock Road Verona Sand Road Local 45205 Quinn Road West Wilton Road 18 Road 38 Local Jamieson Road Collector 44005 Loughborough Portland RoAlton Road Vanluven Road Collector 41605 Loughborough Portland RoJamieson Road 45025 River Road West End of Road Petworth Road Local 40135 Latimer Road Holmes Road Davidson Road Local 45940 Factory Road Washburn Road Sunbury Road Local 44530 Fellows Road West End of Road Murvale Road Local 42100 McGarvey Road Battersea Road 0.15km North of Batters Local 42670 Peters Road Harrowsmith Road East End of Road Local 45490 Arena Boundary Road Second Lake Road Snider Road Local 41725 Horning Road West End of Road Sydenham Road Local 44455 Rockwood Place Collins Drive Moreland Dixon Road Local 43075 York Road South End of Road Bellrock Road Local 42085 Murton Road Road 38 1.35km East of Road 38 Local 44275 Murton Road 1.35km East of Road 38 Murvale Road Local 41710 Fairgrounds Road Perth Road 10 Latimer Road Local 44590 Davidson Road Holmes Road Mowoods Lane Local 44070 New Morin Road Vanluven Road Holleford Road Local 42985 Mallen Road Craig Road 0.10km North of Craig RoLocal 40600 Holleford Road 0.15km East of Road 38 Vanluven Road Local 45160 Crow Lake Road 0.45km West of Badour R 0.10km East of Badour R Local 46270 Station Street Walker Street Bank Street Local 50750 Davidson Road Mowoods Lane Latimer Road Local 42370 Bradford Road Wolfe Swamp Road Ellerbeck Road Local 43705 Frontenac Road Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Local 45985 Latimer Road Davidson Road Holmes Road Collector 40585 Stage Coach Road Railton Road Campbell Road Collector Collector 40045 Bradford Road 2.00km East of Camden P Wolfe Swamp Road Collector 45175 Alton Road Loughborough Portland R Bedford Road 43210 Mount Chesney Road Frontenac Road Beach Nut Road Local 41695 Quarry Road 0.40km North of Boyce Ro1.30km North of Boyce RLocal 43015 Davidson Road Latimer Road Holmes Road Local 43105 Holleford Road Trousdale Road New Morin Road Local 45415 Holmes Road Silverwood Drive Davidson Road Local 40645 Rideau Road Burnt Hills Road 0.75km North of Burnt HLocal 42505 Bradshaw Road Steele Road East End of Road Local Local 46675 German Road 1.65km North of PetworthLong Swamp Road 40930 Wilmer Road McFadden Road Ritchie Road Local Colebrook Road Local 41275 Camden Portland BoundaryYarker Road 4 46105 Church Road (Bellrock) Bellrock Road Mary Moore Road Local 41335 Switzer Road Portland Avenue North End of Road Local Local 44080 Clark Road McConnell Road East End of Road 45430 Petworth Road Kerr Road Road 38 Local 45055 Maple Crest Road Lakefield Drive 0.80km East of Lakefield Local Local 41515 Rideau Road 0.75km North of Burnt Hi North End of Road 44545 Murvale Road Scanlan Road Amey Road Local 44560 Copper Kettle Drive Lakefield Drive Maple Crest Court Local 46315 Murvale Road Murton Road Scanlan Road Local 57900 Westport Road New Road 0.20km East of Burridge Arterial 43600 Quarry Road Boyce Road 0.40km North of Boyce RLocal 52610 Lakefield Drive 2.00km South of Holmes R1.30km South of Holmes Local 46015 Desert Lake Road 0.15km West of High Falls0.15km East of High FallsArterial 40245 Trousdale Road Hinchinbrooke Road Holleford Road Local 43000 Cedarwoods Drive Road 38 Valleyview Drive Local 50625 Holleford Road Vanluven Road Trousdale Road Local 45010 Petworth Road River Road Kerr Road Local 46780 Petworth Road Garrison Court River Road Local 45655 Verona Sand Road West End of Road Cross Road Local North End of Road Local 42010 Duff Road Round Lake Road 45550 Round Lake Road 1.20km East of Latimer Ro2.20km East of Latimer RLocal 45505 Rosedale Road Alton Road Freeman Road Local 41785 Deer Creek Drive Spooner Road 0.40km North of Spoone Local 45040 Orser Road West End of Road Stage Coach Road Local 44695 Norway Road McFadden Road Wilmer Road Local Local 40960 Greenfield Road 0.70km West of Perth RoaPerth Road 10 42115 Spooner Road West End of Road 0.45km West of Perth RoLocal 45670 Verona Sand Road Cross Road 0.70km East of Cross RoaLocal 46750 Wolfe Swamp Road Colebrook Road Petworth Road Local 41050 Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road Holsgrove Lane Local 43870 Leveque Road 0.10km North of Bellrock Bellrock Pero Road Local Local 45370 Redmond Road 0.25km West of HollefordHolleford Road 42595 Graham Road Park Street Road 38 Local 40165 Arena Boundary Road Davey Road 2.15km East of Davey RoLocal 43690 Latimer Road Dover Road Davidson Road Collector 42550 Holmes Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent Local 56980 Mount Chesney Road West End of Road Battersea Road Local

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

1300 600 1650 1250 200 300 2600 800 300 1200 2900 1600 450 400 2200 250 2100 950 2000 900 2700 3300 1900 1400 1750 4750 1650 1600 700 1800 300 1900 900 500 1100 150 1600 1700 1600 1450 300 500 600 700 830 1000 500 400 1500 2150 300 3250 2200 1780 2300 2200 400 1500 450 100 2600 150 2000 2000 2700 4050 500 550 500 250 600 850 310 550 850 600 800 200 450 800 750 800 1450 130 1800 650

5.4 6.4 6.1 6.7 5.1 6.5 6.4 5.9 4.8 6.2 5.6 6.6 5.5 5.8 6.1 3.5 5.5 5.9 6.4 6.1 6.6 5.6 4.9 6.7 5.3 6.7 6.1 6.3 5.4 6.7 6.2 6.6 6.1 7 6.5 7 6.4 6.1 4.5 5.5 7.2 5.7 6.2 6 6.1 6.4 6 6.4 4.5 4.7 5.9 5.8 5.2 5.5 6 6 6.7 6.5 4.5 5.2 6.7 5.8 6.4 6.5 6.4 6.2 4.3 6 6.3 3.5 6.1 6.5 6.9 6.5 6 5 6 7.1 7.3 6.4 6.2 5.6 6.5 7.3 6.5 6.7

7020 3840 10065 8375 1020 1950 16640 4720 1440 7440 16240 10560 2475 2320 13420 875 11550 5605 12800 5490 17820 18480 9310 9380 9275 31825 10065 10080 3780 12060 1860 12540 5490 3500 7150 1050 10240 10370 7200 7975 2160 2850 3720 4200 5063 6400 3000 2560 6750 10105 1770 18850 11440 9790 13800 13200 2680 9750 2025 520 17420 870 12800 13000 17280 25110 2150 3300 3150 875 3660 5525 2139 3575 5100 3000 4800 1420 3285 5120 4650 4480 9425 949 11700 4355

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

72 73 74 75 75 75 76 76 79 79 79 80 80 81 82 82 84 84 85 85 60 60 67 67 71 72 75 77 83 88 85 66 66 66 67 69 72 75 75 76 78 81 81 84 84 84 86 87 58 63 69 70 75 75 76 77 78 80 82 84 84 84 85 85 67 72 64 66 67 68 72 73 73 74 75 75 79 80 81 82 84 87 90 90 92 75

Cost $/m assumed 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 1050 270 270 375 270 270 1050 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 550 270 270 270 450

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

351,000.00 162,000.00 445,500.00 337,500.00 54,000.00 81,000.00 702,000.00 216,000.00 81,000.00 324,000.00 783,000.00 432,000.00 121,500.00 108,000.00 594,000.00 67,500.00 567,000.00 256,500.00 540,000.00 243,000.00 729,000.00 891,000.00 513,000.00 378,000.00 472,500.00 1,282,500.00 1,732,500.00 432,000.00 189,000.00 675,000.00 81,000.00 513,000.00 945,000.00 135,000.00 297,000.00 40,500.00 432,000.00 459,000.00 432,000.00 391,500.00 81,000.00 135,000.00 162,000.00 189,000.00 224,100.00 270,000.00 135,000.00 108,000.00 405,000.00 580,500.00 81,000.00 877,500.00 594,000.00 480,600.00 621,000.00 594,000.00 108,000.00 405,000.00 121,500.00 27,000.00 702,000.00 40,500.00 540,000.00 540,000.00 1,215,000.00 1,822,500.00 135,000.00 148,500.00 135,000.00 67,500.00 162,000.00 229,500.00 83,700.00 148,500.00 229,500.00 162,000.00 216,000.00 54,000.00 121,500.00 216,000.00 202,500.00 440,000.00 391,500.00 35,100.00 486,000.00 292,500.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

1990 2010 1996 2010 1996 2010 1995 2010 1994 1995 1995 1994 1995 1995 1997 1996 1996 2010 2000 2000 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 15 10 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 10

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032

2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2041 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2042 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2043 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2044 2045

Page 289 of 470

43615 Lakefield Drive 1.30km South of Holmes RHolmes Road Local 43095 Holmes Road Heska Crescent Silverwood Drive Local 42490 German Road Petworth Road 1.65km North of Petwor Local 42790 Heska Crescent Holmes Road Holmes Road Local 43450 Kildeer Drive Pine Ridge Road North End of Road Local 43345 Johns Way Road Heska Crescent Heska Crescent Local 41740 Davidson Road Latimer Road Perth Road 10 Local 40000 Abernathy Road Ida Hill Road 0.8km East of Ida Hill RoaLocal 43630 Lakeside Road West End of Road Duff Road Local 45535 Round Lake Road Latimer Road 1.20km East of Latimer RLocal 45970 Stage Coach Road Orser Road Railton Road Local 46420 Washburn Road Ida Hill Road Factory Road Local 42415 Garrison Court South End of Road Petworth Road Local 44470 Mount Chesney Road Battersea Road Frontenac Road Local 45340 Randy Clark Road West End of Road Battersea Road Local 44185 Masonville Road North End of Road Craig Road Local Petworth Road Local 40945 Camden Portland BoundaryColebrook Road 45835 Silverwood Drive Holmes Road North End of Road Local Local 43720 Campbell Road 0.5km West of Stage CoacStage Coach Road 44485 Gould Lake Road Freeman Road 0.85km North of Freema Local 43060 Holleford Road Deer Park Lane Desert Lake Road Local 46375 Wallace Road Camden Portland Bounda Mclean Road Local 42955 Hogan Road West End of Road Wilmer Road Local 43120 Holmes Road Davidson Road Latimer Road Local 46690 Wilmer Road Ritchie Road Norway Road Local 46660 Wilmer Road Rutledge Road McFadden Road Local West End of Road 0.15km West of BatterseLocal 45130 Princess Road 43825 Leland Road 0.30km East of Perth Road1.60km East of Perth RoaLocal 46705 Wilmer Road Norway Road 0.05km West of Perth RoLocal 45220 Railton Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Collector 43810 Leland Road Perth Road 10 0.30km East of Perth RoaLocal 45460 Ritchie Road Wilmer Road Perth Road 10 Local 45385 Revell Road Bank Street North End of Road Local 44380 Middle Woodlands Drive Autumn Ridge Drive South End of Road Local 44635 North Shore Crescent Perth Road 10 Perth Road 10 Local 41485 Collins Drive Autumn Ridge Drive West End of Road Local 44770 Old Boy Road Perth Road 10 Holmes Road Local 46570 White Lake Road Buck Bay Road 1.70km East of Buck Bay Local 44230 McConnell Road South End of Road Clark Road Local 44245 McConnell Road Clark Road Yarker Road 4 Local 40240 Autumn Ridge Drive Middle Woodland Drive South End of Road Local 40570 Bradford Road Camden Portland Bounda 2.00km East of Camden Local Local 43585 Lakefield Drive South End of Road Holmes Road 41550 Country Woods Drive Campbell Road South End of Road Local Local 42700 Greenfield Road 0.77km East of Perth RoadDuff Road Local 46150 Sydenham Walker Road Loughborough Portland R Rock Quarry Lane 40300 Bank Street Revell Road Revell Road Local 43135 Holmes Road Latimer Road Old Boy Road Local 42055 Ellerbeck Road Bradford Road Petworth Road Local 40150 Arena Boundary Road Snider Road Davey Road Local 40780 Burnett Road South End of Road Road 38 Local 40201 Burnt Hills Road 1.8km East of Battersea R5.0km East of Battersea Local 40270 Badour Road South End of Road Crow Lake Road Local 40510 Boyce Road Watson Road 0.7km West of Road 38 Local Holsgrove Lane James Wilson Road Local 41065 Canoe Lake Road 46735 Wolfe Lake Road Westport Road North End of Road Local 42250 Forest Hill Point Valleyview Drive South End of Road Local Davidson Road Local 43180 Holmes Road Lakefield Drive 44365 Mica Point Road South End of Road Badour Road Local 44680 Norway Road Draper Lake Road Charlie Green Road Local 45715 Sands Road Battersea Road East End of Road Local 43665 Norway Road Draper Lake Road Norway Road Local 40975 Campbell Road Murvale Road Stage Coach Road Local 44395 Milburn Road Ida Hill Road 2.0km West of Ida Hill RoLocal 57670 Westport Road 2.70km West of Buck Bay Buck Bay Road Arterial Arterial 51345 Bedford Road 1.5km North of Freeman RBusch Lane 43945 Loughborough Drive Road South End of Road Sydenham Road Local 45955 Spooner Road Perth Road 10 East End of Road Local Local 46300 Valleyview Drive South End of Road Cedarwoods Drive 44575 Mustard Road East End of Road Craig Road Local 43195 Holmes Road Davidson Road Moreland Dixon Road Local 40966 Milburn Road Battersea Road Ida Hill Road Local 41185 Cedarwoods Drive Valleyview Drive 0.30km North of Valleyv Local 46510 Wellington Street United Street Milburn Road Local 41005 Canoe Lake Road Desert Lake Road 0.8km North of Desert LaLocal 43570 Lake Road 0.60km West of Lower RoLower Round Lake Road Local 45520 Round Lake Road Moreland Dixon Road Latimer Road Local 44950 Park Street Centennial Park Road Graham Road Local Local 44965 Park Valley Road South End of Road Keeley Road 41380 Cliffside Drive Railton Road North End of Road Local 40495 Botting Road Bedford Road Sills Bay Road Local 40210 Ashwood Drive Rutledge Road North End of Road Local 40967 Milburn Road 2.9km East of Battersea R 0.45km East of Ormsbee Local 44350 Meadow Ridge Road Park Valley Road East End of Road Local 44410 Milburn Road 1.80km South of Batterse Wellington Street Local 53070 Desert Lake Road 2.55km West of Bedford R1.90km West of Bedford Arterial

Roadside Environment

Street

Classification

1.70km West of Bedford RBedford Road Arterial Deyos Road Holleford Road Arterial 1.70km East of Cambden 2.70km East of CambdenLocal 0.70km North of Bellrock 1.70km North of BellrockLocal West End of Road Wilmer Road Local 2.70km East of Cambden 3.80km East of CambdenLocal Cambden Portland Bound 1.70km East of CambdenLocal Burns Road Burridge Road Local Church Road (Bellrock) 2.07km North of Church Local Battersea Road Ida Hill Road Local Road 38 East End of Road Local 0.20km North of Road 38 0.29km North of TrousdaLocal 1.3km North of Desert Lak2.8km North of Desert LaLocal 3.80km East of Cambden 5.30km East of CambdenLocal 2.07km North of Church R3.17km North of Church Local Collector 0.05km East of SydenhamCliffside Drive Local 1.00km East of Factory RoEast End of Road West End of Road Lower Round Lake Road Local Wilmer Road Norway Road Local Local Battersea Road East End of Road Perth Road 10 Holmes Road Local Perth Road 10 Lakefield Drive Local Milburn Road East End of Road Local Sunbury Road Milburn Road Local Factory Road 1.00km East of Factory RLocal Bedford Road Sills Bay Road Local Old Boy Road Perth Road 10 Local Sumac Road North End of Road Local Little Long Lake Road Norway Road Local Park Valley Road Rutledge Road Local Perth Road 10 0.77km East of Perth RoaLocal Botting Road North End of Road Local Bedford Road Botting Road Local Green Bay Road Bradshaw Road Local Local 2.00km South of Arena BoRoad 38 Sydenham Road East End of Road Local Local 0.55km East of Stage CoacSydenham Road Charlie Green Road McFadden Road Local Arena Boundary Road 2.00km South of Arena BLocal 0.29km North of Trousdal 0.99km North of TrousdaLocal Stage Coach Road 0.55km East of Stage CoaCollector Railton Road North End of Road Local Railton Road 0.60km North of Railton Local Vienna Crescent 0.05km North of Vienna Local Local 0.60km North of Railton RNorth End of Road Arterial 4.5km North of Burnt HillsEast End of Road Busch Lane Salmon Lake Road Arterial Salmon Lake Road 1.0km North of Salmon LArterial 0.15km East of High Falls Bauder Drive Arterial Bauder Drive Deyos Road Arterial Centreville Road Westport Road Local Road 38 1.30km East of Road 38 Local West End of Road Sunbury Road Local Devil Lake Road 0.40km East of Devil Lak Local Battersea Road 1.2km East of Battersea Local 0.61km West of Carrying 0.49km East of Rideau RLocal Westport Road 3.0km South of Westpor Local North End of Road Hitchcock Drive Local Local 1.05km West of Gould LakGould Lake Road 1.2km East of Battersea R 1.4km East of Battersea Local 5.0km East of Battersea R 0.61km West of CarryingLocal 0.40km East of Devil Lake 0.80km East of Devil Lak Local West End of Road Buck Bay Road Local South End of Road Hitchcock Drive Local Desert Lake Road East End of Road Local 1.4km East of Battersea R 1.8km East of Battersea Local Bellrock Mill Street 0.70km North of BellrockLocal Long Swamp Road 0.20km South of Long SwLocal Bank Street North End of Road Local Local 0.99km North of Trousdal Moore Farm Lane Buck Bay Road New Road Arterial Perth Road 10 4.40km East of Perth RoaLocal 4.40km East of Perth Road7.70km East of Perth RoaLocal 7.70km East of Perth RoadPost Office Gate Lane Local 1.70km East of Post Offic 4.65km East of Post Offi Local Post Office Gate Lane 1.70km East of Post Offi Local 0.3km North of Westport White Lake Road Local 1.90km West of Bedford R1.70km West of Bedford Arterial 3.50km East of Latimer Ro4.10km East of Latimer RLocal West End of Road Murvale Road Local Scanlan Road North End of Road Local South End of Road 1.0km South of Burnt Hil Local Petworth Road Boyce Road Local West End of Road 0.50km West of MurvaleLocal 0.50km West of Murvale Murvale Road Local 2.20km East of Latimer Ro3.50km East of Latimer RLocal

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Maintenace Class Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 6 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 5 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

1700 2800 1000 1000 1200 1100 1700 2900 2200 2000 1600 1000 1500 1500 1100 2900 3150 400 1850 2700 500 1400 1700 1900 1000 800 1200 350 2200 2200 770 1700 500 4200 3000 1150 1200 350 2000 700 550 700 600 50 500 6100 2400 1000 1550 2200 1650 1300 850 400 1200 1700 3000 1150 1150 200 1000 400 1100 300 1200 400 700 200 50 1400 7700 4400 3300 3950 2950 1700 1700 200 600 950 200 4800 1400 950 500 1300

6.7 6.7 6.5 6 5.5 6.5 6.5 6 5.5 6.2 5.2 6.4 6.7 6.5 5.5 6.4 6.3 5.5 6.7 5.8 6 6.3 6.5 6.8 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.4 6 6.4 6.5 6.2 5.1 5 6.2 6.9 6.7 5.2 6.2 6.7 6.4 6.1 6 7.3 6 6.7 6.7 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.7 5.6 6.1 6 5.8 5.3 6 6.7 6.2 6.5 5.8 6 6.7 6.5 4.2 6.2 5.2 5.3 4.7 6.4 6.6 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 5.7 6.2 6.3 4.2 6.1 6 6.4 6.5 6 6.1

11390 18760 6500 6000 6600 7150 11050 17400 12100 12400 8320 6400 10050 9750 6050 18560 19845 2200 12395 15660 3000 8820 11050 12920 6300 4960 7680 2240 13200 14080 5005 10540 2550 21000 18600 7935 8040 1820 12400 4690 3520 4270 3600 365 3000 40870 16080 6400 10385 14740 11055 7280 5185 2400 6960 9010 18000 7705 7130 1300 5800 2400 7370 1950 5040 2480 3640 1060 235 8960 50820 28600 21450 25675 19175 11050 9690 1240 3780 3990 1220 28800 8960 6175 3000 7930

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

76 80 58 59 60 64 65 65 65 66 67 67 68 68 69 82 70 73 74 75 75 75 75 77 77 78 79 79 80 80 81 81 81 82 82 82 83 84 84 84 92 87 90 92 93 62 75 77 79 83 65 66 68 70 71 71 71 75 76 79 80 81 83 83 84 85 86 90 91 93 62 73 76 76 80 83 88 80 81 84 85 87 88 90 90 93

Cost $/m assumed 450 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 375 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 375 270 270 270 270 450 450 450 450 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

765,000.00 1,260,000.00 270,000.00 270,000.00 324,000.00 297,000.00 459,000.00 783,000.00 594,000.00 540,000.00 432,000.00 270,000.00 405,000.00 405,000.00 297,000.00 1,087,500.00 850,500.00 108,000.00 499,500.00 729,000.00 135,000.00 378,000.00 459,000.00 513,000.00 270,000.00 216,000.00 324,000.00 94,500.00 594,000.00 594,000.00 207,900.00 459,000.00 135,000.00 1,134,000.00 810,000.00 310,500.00 324,000.00 94,500.00 540,000.00 189,000.00 206,250.00 189,000.00 162,000.00 13,500.00 135,000.00 2,745,000.00 1,080,000.00 450,000.00 697,500.00 990,000.00 445,500.00 351,000.00 229,500.00 108,000.00 324,000.00 459,000.00 810,000.00 310,500.00 310,500.00 54,000.00 270,000.00 108,000.00 297,000.00 81,000.00 324,000.00 108,000.00 189,000.00 54,000.00 13,500.00 378,000.00 3,465,000.00 1,188,000.00 891,000.00 1,066,500.00 796,500.00 459,000.00 459,000.00 90,000.00 162,000.00 256,500.00 54,000.00 1,296,000.00 378,000.00 256,500.00 135,000.00 351,000.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 1997 1997 2021 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019

10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 3 3 3 15 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 15 6 6 6 6 6 3 10 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 3

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2028 to 2032 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052

2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2045 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2046 2047 2047 2047 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2048 2049 2049 2049 2049 2049 2049 2049 2049 2049

Page 290 of 470

53300 Desert Lake Road 52955 Desert Lake Road 41410 Colebrook Road 42160 First Lake Road 44440 Morrison Road 41425 Colebrook Road 41395 Colebrook Road 42640 Green Bay Road 44170 Mary Moore Road 46405 Washburn Road 45190 Quinn Road East 42865 Hinchinbrooke Road 41035 Canoe Lake Road 41440 Colebrook Road 44155 Mary Moore Road 45280 Railton Road 46450 Washburn Road 42070 Ernie Road 44260 McFadden Road 40375 Bear Creek Road 41755 Davidson Road 43165 Holmes Road 46525 Wellington Street 43255 Ida Hill Road 46435 Washburn Road 42355 Freeman Road 43150 Holmes Road 46345 Vienna Crescent 41260 Charlie Green Road 43390 Keeley Road 42685 Greenfield Road 45820 Sills Bay Road 41365 Clearwater Road 40489 Bob’s Lake Road 45880 Snider Road 46075 Sumac Road 45250 Railton Road 44685 Norway Road 45865 Snider Road 42880 Hinchinbrooke Road 45235 Railton Road 43480 Kingsmere Lane 41635 Daley Road 46765 Wurtz Crescent 41650 Daley Road 50875 Battersea Road 51460 Bedford Road 51575 Bedford Road 52725 Desert Lake Road 52840 Desert Lake Road 41905 Devil Lake Road 43300 Jamieson Road 42940 Hitchcock Drive 41230 Centreville Road 40810 Burnt Hills Road 40870 Burnt Hills Road 41125 Canoe Lake Road 46060 Stone Point Road 42325 Freeman Road 40825 Burnt Hills Road 40855 Burnt Hills Road 41245 Centreville Road 46555 White Lake Road 44110 Maple Hill Way 40360 Bauder Road 40840 Burnt Hills Road 42145 First Lake Road 42475 German Road 45805 Short Street 42895 Hinchinbrooke Road 57785 Westport Road 44800 Opinicon Road 44815 Opinicon Road 44830 Opinicon Road 44860 Opinicon Road 44845 Opinicon Road 40720 Buck Bay Road 53185 Desert Lake Road 45580 Round Lake Road 40075 Amey Road 45745 Scanlan Court 41155 Carrying Place Road 46480 Watson Road 45760 Scanlan Road 45775 Scanlan Road 45565 Round Lake Road

From

Street

44650 North Shore Road 40735 Buck Bay Road 46030 Steele Road 40750 Buck Bay Road 41935 Deyos Road 40765 Bunker Hill Road 41950 Deyos Road 41170 Carrying Place Road 42910 Hinchinbrooke Road 58245 Westport Road 58360 Westport Road 58475 Westport Road 44020 Lower Round Lake Road 44035 Lower Round Lake Road

From

Classification

North Shore Crescent Hewlett Packard Road Local White Lake Road 2.6km North of White LaLocal South End of Road Bradshaw Road Local Local 2.6km North of White LakBob’s Lake Road Morey Lane James Wilson Road Local Westport Road James Wilson Road Local Desert Lake Road Morey Lane Local Local 1.0km South of Burnt HillsBurnt Hills Road Moore Farm Lane Desert Lake Road Local Arterial 0.76km West of Bresee RoBresee Road Bresee Road Concession 12 Arterial Concession 12 Devil Lake Road Arterial Round Lake Road Ernie Road Local Ernie Road East End of Road Local

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

5800 2650 2200 3800 2500 2600 1100 1050 4400 1200 1400 1350 2100 1450

6.3 6.7 5 5.5 4.5 5 4 6 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.2

36540 17755 11000 20900 11250 13000 4400 6300 27280 7920 9240 8910 13860 8990

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

67 73 80 87 73 76 87 90 94 100 100 100 100 100

Cost $/m assumed 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 450 450 270 270

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,566,000.00 715,500.00 594,000.00 1,026,000.00 675,000.00 702,000.00 297,000.00 283,500.00 1,188,000.00 540,000.00 630,000.00 607,500.00 567,000.00 391,500.00 266,467,700.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2020 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

9 6 6 3 6 6 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3

Timing of First Timing of First Replacement (based Replacement (based on Risk) on Risk) 2033 to 2039 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2040 to 2046 2047 to 2052 2047 to 2052

2050 2050 2050 2050 2051 2051 2051 2051 2051 2052 2052 2052 2052 2052

Page 291 of 470

Appendix E2 - Bridges and Culverts (>3m) Bridges & Culverts (OSIM) Site No. 63280 63360 63290 63460 63350 63370 63210 63270 63080 63010 63330 63190 63440 63200 63400 63070 63300 63020 63550 63380 63561 63540 63160 63250

Name

Bridge/ Culvert

Fish Creek Bridge (B30) Shales Road Culvert (B41) Eagle Creek Culvert (B31) Buck Bay Rd Bridge (N of White Lake) (B52) Long Swamp Rd Bridge Closed (B39) Railton Road Bridge (B42) Bedford Mills Road Culvert (B23) Buck Bay Bridge (Green Bay Rd) (B29) Sydenham Lake Bridge and Dam (B08) Battersea Bridge (B01) First Lake Road Bridge (B37) Bedford Mills Bridge (B21) Opinicon Lake Bridge (B50) Sunbury Road Canal Overpass (B22) 50/50 Mitchell Creek Bridge (B45) Rutledge Road Bridge (B07) 12th Concession Bridge (B32) Loughborough Lake Bridge (B02) Maynard Structure (B48) Church Street Culvert (B43) Petworth Bridge (B40) Road 38 (Hardwood Creek Verona) Bridge High Falls Bridge Desert Lk Rd (B18) Buck Bay Road Bridge, N of Wesport Rd (B27)

Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge

Type T‐Beam Frame, Inclined Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs I‐beam or Girders Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangle Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs T‐Beam I‐beam or Girders I‐beam or Girders Earth Filled Arch Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs I‐beam or Girders I‐beam or Girders Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Through Truss I‐beam or Girders Rectangular Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs

Road Class

Posted Speed

Year Constructed/ Rehabilitated

AGE (2022)

of

Spans

Total Length (m)

Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Collector Arterial Local Arterial Local Arterial Local Collector Local Arterial Local Local Arterial Arterial Collector Local

80 80 80 80 80 50 80 80 50 50 80 80 80 80 10 50 80 80 80 50 80 60 80 80

1927 1955 1945 2008 1940 1928 1940 1965 1978 1979 1995 1997 2001 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 2013 2013 2014 2022

95 67 77 14 82 94 82 57 44 43 27 25 21 17 15 14 13 12 10 9 9 9 8 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1

6.7 3.0 3.9 3.8 11.9 6.1 3.6 6.7 8.0 8.2 8.3 19.1 12.0 74.7 9.8 6.3 4.0 43.6 24.6 6.0 23.3 12.2 10.5 7.1

Existing Road Historical Cost Width / Width Surface Area ($) Span (m) (m2) (m) 5.2 5.5 5.4 4.5 4.6 5.4 8.0 9.1 12.2 11.2 10.0 9.9 5.7 11.7 5.1 14.2 6.4 12.5 7.5 8.0 4.2 15.4 9.0 7.2

4.4 4.7 4.6 5.0 4.0 4.9 4.5 4.5 6.8 8.6 6.4 8.8 5.3 9.0 5.1 13.3 5.6 9.9 7.5 7.6 4.4 13.1 5.2 7.0

35 17 21 17 55 30 29 61 98 92 83 189 68 874 50 89 26 545 185 48 98 188 95 51

7,357 7,563 11,080 38,840 16,655 7,370 16,857 21,164 157,069 148,430 279,066 117,766 8,578 1,132,096 526,798 251,377 115,000 1,500,000 354,213 11,130 21,482 103,487 876,000 706,171 $

63060 63120 63110 63130 63040 63510 63180 63170 63340 64003 63410 63310 63320 63050 63140 63150 63220 63390 63090 63560

Burego Lane Culvert (B06) Bracken Culvert (B13) Murvale Creek Culvert (B12) Culvert Under Road 38 (B14) Buck Lake Culvert (B04) Clair Road Culvert (B36) Devil Lake Culvert (B20) Road 38 Bridge (B19) Craig Creek Culvert (B38) Anderson Rd Culvert (03‐CULV) Milburn Creek Culvert (B46) Colebrook Road Culvert (B33) Watson Road Culvert (B34) Sydenham Road Culvert Bridge (B05) Depot Creek Culvert (B16) Bellrock Rd. Culvert (B17) Massassauga Road Culvert (B24) Salmon Lake Rd Culvert / Otter Lake (B44) Little Long Lake Culvert (B10) Desert Lake Causeway (14‐CULV) Petworth Road Culvert (B35)

Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert Culvert

Round Culvert (Twin) Arch Culvert Arch Culvert Rectangular Culvert Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arch Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arch Culvert Arch Culvert Arch Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Rectangular Culvert Rectangular Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Round Culvert Rigid Frame, Vertical Legs Arch Culverts (3) Round Culvert (Twin)

Local Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Local Collector Arterial Local Local Local Local Local Local Collector Collector Local Collector Local Collector Local

80 80 80 80 80 80 60 80 80 80 80 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 60 60 80

1993 1966 1993 1965 1970 1965 1965 1996 1998 1962 1980 1980 1981 1980 1980 1980 2015 2016 1992 2019 2020

29 56 29 57 52 57 57 26 24 60 42 42 41 42 42 42 7 6 30 3 2

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2

9.3 21.0 29.6 22.2 17.2 3.5 24.8 28.1 22.0 3.0 19.5 19.9 11.2 22.2 27.5 20.3 12.0 25.2 4.8 18.0 22.2

3.8 4.4 3.7 4.2 3.2 4.8 3.6 3.7 4.7 6.0 5.5 3.7 3.6 4.3 6.1 3.0 4.5 3.6 15.4 3.6 3.6

3.8 6.9 7.1 7.1 7.0 4.1 7.0 11.0 5.3 5.4 6.5 7.3 6.0 4.3 10.6 8.0 4.5 9.0 7.5 6.0 6.5

35 92 108 93 55 17 89 104 103 18 107 74 40 95 168 61 54 91 74 65 80

69678 81215 139100 71606 43572 11195 63754 60609 191194 11661 236337 94579 99885 192631 295812 107360 239000 350000 44904 0 0

Replacement Cost ($000)

BCI

1,550,000 450,000 982,000 850,000 665,000 850,000 350,000 645,000 1,115,000 1,050,000 950,000 2,125,000 850,000 5,000,000 900,000 980,000 350,000 6,280,000 2,550,000 275,000 1,225,000 2,145,000 1,100,000 707,000

8.1 31.9 38.5 52.4 0.1 28.7 46.2 70.2 71.2 72.2 74.6 67.5 28.4 73.7 74.3 65.0 75.0 74.6 69.0 29.4 73.2 68.3 75.0 100.0

0% 11% 0% 81% 0% 0% 0% 24% 41% 43% 64% 67% 72% 77% 80% 81% 83% 84% 87% 88% 88% 88% 89% 100%

Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 5 4 3 5 5 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 1 2 2 5 2 2 1 1

0.3 38.1 60.3 68.8 53.1 25.5 54.7 69.7 65.8 69.1 75.0 63.8 63.8 73.8 72.1 74.1 92.1 88.7 41.3 98.9 98.9

42% 25% 42% 24% 0% 0% 0% 48% 52% 0% 16% 16% 18% 44% 44% 44% 86% 88% 60% 94% 96%

5 4 2 2 3 5 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 1 1

Health & Safety Risk

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Replacement‐ Based on Risk

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4

1927 1955 1945 2008 1940 1928 1940 1965 1978 1979 1995 1997 2001 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 2013 2013 2014 2022

75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75

20 20 16 12 20 20 12 8 8 10 8 10 20 10 8 8 4 10 8 20 10 10 4 4

2024 to 2027 2024 to 2027 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2024 to 2027 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle based on life cycle 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle 2028 to 2032 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle 2024 to 2027 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle based on life cycle

3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

1993 1966 1993 1965 1970 1965 1965 1996 1998 1962 1980 1980 1981 1980 1980 1980 2015 2016 1992 2019 2020

50 75 50 75 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 75 75 75 50 50 75 50 50

15 16 8 8 12 15 9 8 6 6 3 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 12 3 3

2028 to 2032 2024 to 2027 based on life cycle based on life cycle 2028 to 2032 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle 2028 to 2032 based on life cycle based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement (based on life cycle)

2076 2076 2070

2082 2083 2084 2087

2089 2097

Timing of Timing of First Second Replacement (based Replacement on risk) (life cycle) 2023 2098 2025 2100 2025 2100 2030 2105 2031 2106 2033 2108 2035 2110 2040 2115 2053 2054 2070 2072 2076 2080 2082 2083 2084 2085 2087 2088 2088 2088 2089 2097

33,944,000 78,000 527,200 796,860 480,000 1,035,000 230,000 1,092,500 862,500 805,000 180,000 435,000 350,000 180,000 522,004 950,000 440,000 160,000 525,000 365,650 635,000 450,000

11,099,714

45,043,714

2053 2075

2050 2058 2048 2058 2061 2055 2055 2078 2077 2079 2065 2066 2069 2070

2023 2024 2025 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2031 2034 2035 2045 2045 2055 2055 2055 2065 2066 2067 2069 2070

2073 2099 2075 2100 2076 2077 2078 2079 2081 2084 2085 2095 2095

2115 2116 2119 2120

Page 292 of 470

Appendix E3 - Water Treatment Facilities Water Treatment and Storage Facilities Timing of First Replacement (based on life cycle) 2105 2105

Timing of Second Replacement (Life Cycle)

WTP

Raw Water Intake (400mm)

2005

100

$227,000.00

2005

100

Timing of First Replacement‐Based on Risk based on life cycle

Storage

Elevated Water Storage Tower

2005

100

$996,000.00

1,646,236.25

83%

2005

100

based on life cycle

WTP

Treatment Plant

2005

$2,971,176.00

4,910,901.22

66%

2005

2028 to 2032

2055

2105

WTP

Plant Upgrades (UV & GAC contactors)

2010

$1,009,881.00

1,439,848.83

52%

2010

2028 to 2032

2035

2060

Type

TOTAL

Asset Description

Construction Year

Useful Life

Historical Construction Cost

$5,204,057.00

2022 Replacement Cost* 375,196.41

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Consequence of Failure Failure (1 = good/not likely, 5 Remaining (1 = low, 5 = high) = poor/likely) (based on age) 83% 1 5

Inst Year

Useful Life (yrs)

Risk

Timing of First Replacement

Timing of Third Replacement (Life Cycle)

Tming of Fourth Replacement (Life Cycle)

2085

2110

2105 2105

$8,372,182.71

Page 293 of 470

Appendix E4 - Water Mains Water Main Asset ID

DIAMETER LENGTH UNIT PRICE CONST USEFUL LIFE QUANTITY (mm) (m) ($) YEAR (YRS)

Street Name

Intersection 1

Intersection 2

Point Rd Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Stage Coach Rd Water Tower Site Water Tower Site Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd William St William St William St Church St Church St Walker Rd Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave George St George St George St George St George St George St George St George St Bedford Rd Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Mill St Mill St Mill St Mill St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Ameilia St Ameilia St Ameilia St Cross St Cross St Cross St

Wheatley George Cross Rutledge Rutledge Mill Mill Rutledge Stage Coach Stage Coach Water Tower Site Water Tower Site Rutledge Rutledge Rutledge William William William Morgan Morgan Rutledge Rutledge Rutledge William William Rock Quarry Ln Church Church Church Church Brewery Amelia Amelia Mill Wheatley Wheatley Wheatley Portland George Amelia Amelia Rutledge Rutledge Brewery Cross Wheatley Wheatley Point Point Point Brewery Brewery Brewery Mill Mill Mill

Water Plant Point Point Cross Cross Wheatley Wheatley Water Tower Water Tower Water Tower Campbell Campbell South End South End South End West End Morgan Morgan Stage Coach Stage Coach Church Church Church Walker Walker Church George George George Brewery Amelia Mill Mill Wheatley Portland Portland Portland East End Amelia Mill Mill Brewery Brewery Cross George Sailors Cove Ln Sailors Cove Ln George George George George George George Wheatley Wheatley Wheatley

250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 150 150 150 150 150 150

Rutledge Wheatley Wheatley Wheatley Water Tower Rutledge Rutledge Rutledge Rutledge Rutledge Portland Portland William William Church Church William William William William George George George George Bedford Brewery Brewery Mill Mill Mill Wheatley Wheatley Stage-Coach Morgan Dr Morgan

Stage-Coach Cross Rutledge Point Stage-Coach William Morgan Morgan Stage-Coach Wheatley Church Bedford Rutlege Church William Portland Brewery Brewery Amelia Mill Mill Wheatley Bridge Bridge Portland Mill Amelia Rutledge Brewery Cross Point George Water Tower Rutledge Morgan

250 250 250 250 250 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200

Water Main 95001 95002 95003 95004 95005 95006 95007 95008 95009 95010 95011 95012 95013 95014 95015 95016 95017 95018 95019 95020 95021 95022 95023 95024 95025 95026 95027 95028 95029 95030 95031 95032 95033 95034 95035 95036 95037 95038 95039 95040 95041 95045 95046 95047 95048 95052 95053 95054 95055 95056 95042 95043 95044 95049 95050 95051

279.1 17.2 88.7 265.0 14.3 154.6 8.6 438.2 5.1 50.5 124.0 4.6 199.9 223.9 2.0 226.6 64.6 3.5 225.7 7.4 11.7 40.6 12.5 360.5 12.2 343.1 870.6 11.7 64.8 25.4 241.8 138.8 28.3 136.0 159.4 36.9 68.3 447.5 161.8 94.5 8.1 14.8 92.9 165.4 154.3 78.5 455.5 4.5 151.2 16.9 8.0 194.5 5.4 4.9 124.1 4.6

HISTORIC COST

2022 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

2022 Replacement Cost

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Timing of First Failure (1 = good/not Failure (1 = low, Inst Year Useful Life Risk Replacement-Based likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 = high) on Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 190 180 180 180 180 180 180

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2011 2011 2011 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

55,816.00 3,444.00 17,736.00 53,002.00 2,868.00 30,914.00 1,724.00 87,648.00 1,018.00 10,108.00 23,561.90 879.70 37,979.10 42,531.50 378.10 43,055.90 12,272.10 666.90 42,883.00 1,396.50 2,221.10 7,721.60 2,380.70 68,489.30 2,316.10 65,181.40 165,415.90 2,217.30 12,317.70 4,827.90 45,942.00 26,373.90 5,367.50 25,830.50 30,276.50 7,016.70 12,971.30 85,023.10 30,749.60 17,956.90 1,539.00 2,817.70 17,647.20 31,427.90 29,324.60 14,905.50 86,545.00 847.40 28,729.90 3,211.00 1,441.80 35,011.80 979.20 889.20 22,339.80 819.00

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

92,255.34 5,692.41 29,314.91 87,604.23 4,740.37 51,096.13 2,849.51 144,868.79 1,682.60 16,706.98 38,944.23 1,454.01 52,571.96 58,873.54 523.38 71,164.84 20,283.91 1,102.28 70,879.07 2,308.20 3,671.14 12,762.63 3,934.93 113,202.38 3,828.16 107,734.92 273,407.28 3,664.86 20,359.28 7,979.78 75,935.13 43,592.04 8,871.66 42,693.88 50,042.44 11,597.54 21,439.58 140,530.23 50,824.40 29,680.02 2,543.73 4,657.23 29,168.13 51,945.53 48,469.10 24,636.52 143,045.70 1,400.62 47,486.15 5,307.29 2,383.08 57,869.17 1,618.47 1,469.71 36,924.29 1,353.68

491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 491.73 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 437.09 327.82 327.82 327.82 327.82 327.82 327.82

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

137,231.21 8,467.54 43,606.36 130,312.61 7,051.37 76,006.27 4,238.69 215,494.51 2,502.89 24,851.89 54,203.63 2,023.73 87,370.08 97,842.78 869.81 99,049.15 28,231.69 1,534.19 98,651.39 3,212.62 5,109.59 17,763.37 5,476.75 157,558.12 5,328.14 149,948.37 380,535.62 5,100.85 28,336.60 11,106.48 105,688.56 60,672.57 12,347.82 59,422.49 69,650.42 16,141.76 29,840.19 195,593.76 70,738.78 41,309.45 3,540.44 6,482.06 40,596.99 72,299.19 67,460.59 34,289.77 199,094.86 1,949.42 66,092.50 7,386.83 2,625.82 63,763.90 1,783.33 1,619.42 40,685.50 1,491.57

73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 79 79 79 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73

81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 88% 88% 88% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 81%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3

2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2101 2101 2101 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095

3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2011 2011

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,152.70 4,152.70

4917.27 4917.27 4917.27 4917.27 4917.27 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91 4370.91

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,917.27 4,917.27 4,917.27 4,917.27 4,917.27 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91

33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 39 39

66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 78% 78%

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2011 2011

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

8 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2061 2061

Valves (Mainline Only) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Page 294 of 470

97004 97030 97031 97032 97036 97000 97001 97002 97003 97005 97006 97007 97008 97009 97010 97011 97012 97013 97014 97016 97017 97018 97019 97020 97021 97022 97023 97025 97026 97028 97033 97034 97035 97037 97038

Asset ID

Street Name

Intersection 1

Intersection 2

97039 97241 (S41) 97242 (S42) 97243 (S43) 97015 97024 97027 97029 97201 (S1) 97202 (S2) 97203 (S3) 97204 (S4) 97205 (S5) 97206 (S6) 97207 (S7) 97208 (S8) 97209 (S9) 97210 (S10) 97211 (S11) 97212 (S12) 97213 (S13) 97214 (S14) 97215 (S15) 97216 (S16) 97217 (S17) 97218 (S18) 97220 (S20) 97221 (S21) 97222 (S22) 97223 (S23) 97224 (S24) 97225 (S25) 97226 (S26) 97227 (S27) 97228 (S28) 97229 (S29) 97230 (S30) 97231 (S31) 97232 (S32) 97233 (S33) 97234 (S34) 97235 (S35) 97236 (S36) 97237 (S37) 97238 (S38) 97239 (S39) 97240 (S40) 97244 (S44)

Morgan Morgan Drive Morgan Drive Morgan Drive Amelia Amelia Cross Cross Point Rd Point Rd Wheatley St Wheatley St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Rutledge Rd George St George St George St Bedford Rd Bedford Rd Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Sydenham Walker Rd Sydenham Walker Rd Sydenham Church St Sydenham Church St Sydenham Church St Sydenham William St Sydenham William St Sydenham William St George St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Brewery St Amelia St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd

Morgan Morgan Morgan Morgan William Brewery Mill Wheatley Point Road Wheatley Cross Wheatley Wheatley Rutledge Rutledge Wheatley Rutledge Stage-Coach Water Tower Stage-Coach Stage-Coach George Bridge Portland Bedford Bedford Bedford West West West East Church Church Walker Portland William Rutledge William Brewery Amelia Mill Cross Brewery Amelia Brewery Morgan Rutledge Stage-Coach

South End Rutledge Halfway Southend Amelia Amelia Cross Cross Halfway Point Wheatley Halfway Rutledge Halfway East End Rutledge Stage-Coach Halfway Stage-Coach South End Rutledge Wheatley Wheatley Bedford Halfway North End Portland 97220 97221 97222 97225 Portland Walker West End Church Church William Brewery William William George Mill Mill Brewery Amelia Rutledge West End Rutledge

Services (CS)

Rutledge Road Sydenham William Street Sydenham Walker Street Morgan Dr Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Portland Avenue Bedford Road George Street George Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Cross Street Wheatley Street Sydenham Willaim St George Street Bedford Road Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Rutledge Road

HISTORIC COST

2022 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

200 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000

2011 2011 2011 2011 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,152.70 4,152.70 4,152.70 4,152.70 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54 4,958.54

150 100 38 38 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 19

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2005 2005 2005 2011 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 2,768.47 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2022 Replacement Cost

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Timing of First Failure (1 = good/not Failure (1 = low, Inst Year Useful Life Risk Replacement-Based likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 = high) on Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

4370.91 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54 3824.54

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

4,370.91 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54 3,824.54

39 39 39 39 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33

78% 78% 78% 78% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66%

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

2061 2061 2061 2061 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055

5734.16 1914.92 4,917.27 4,917.27 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 3,278.18

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

5,734.16 1,914.92 4,917.27 4,917.27 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 4,370.91 3,278.18

33 33 33 39 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 39 39 39 39 39 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33

66% 66% 66% 78% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66%

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2055 2055 2055 2061 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055

Page 295 of 470

98030 98134 98067 98267 98008 98031 98032 98033 98039 98041 98043 98044 98046 98048 98057 98059 98066 98068 98069 98070 98071 98072 98073 98074 98075 98076 98077 98078 98079 98080 98081 98091 98095 98102 98122 98143 98152 98223 98227 98231 98251 98253 98261 98264 98267 98000

DIAMETER LENGTH UNIT PRICE CONST USEFUL LIFE QUANTITY (mm) (m) ($) YEAR (YRS)

Asset ID

Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Rutledge Road Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Sydenham Walker Street Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Stage Coach Road Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Portland Avenue Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Bedford Road Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street

Intersection 1

Intersection 2

DIAMETER LENGTH UNIT PRICE CONST USEFUL LIFE QUANTITY (mm) (m) ($) YEAR (YRS) 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

HISTORIC COST $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00

2022 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

2022 Replacement Cost

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70

3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18 3,278.18

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33

66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66%

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Timing of First Failure (1 = good/not Failure (1 = low, Inst Year Useful Life Risk Replacement-Based likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 = high) on Risk 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement-Based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055

Page 296 of 470

98001 98002 98003 98004 98005 98006 98007 98009 98010 98011 98012 98013 98014 98015 98016 98017 98018 98019 98020 98021 98022 98023 98024 98025 98026 98027 98028 98029 98034 98035 98036 98037 98038 98040 98042 98045 98047 98049 98050 98051 98052 98053 98054 98055 98056 98058 98060 98061 98062 98063 98064 98065 98082 98083 98084 98085 98086 98087 98088 98089 98090 98092 98093 98094 98096 98097 98098 98099 98100 98101 98103 98104 98105 98106 98107 98108 98109 98110 98111 98112 98113 98114 98115 98116 98117 98118 98119 98120 98121 98123 98124 98125 98126 98127 98128 98129 98130 98131 98132 98133

Street Name

Asset ID

Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street Sydenham William Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street George Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Brewery Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Mill Street Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Cross Street Sydenham Cross Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street

Intersection 1

Intersection 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2022 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

2022 Replacement Cost

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Timing of First Replacement-Based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

Page 297 of 470

98135 98136 98137 98138 98139 98140 98141 98142 98144 98145 98146 98147 98148 98149 98150 98151 98153 98154 98155 98156 98157 98158 98159 98160 98161 98162 98163 98164 98165 98166 98167 98168 98169 98170 98171 98172 98173 98174 98175 98176 98177 98178 98179 98180 98181 98182 98183 98184 98185 98186 98187 98188 98189 98190 98191 98192 98193 98194 98195 98196 98197 98198 98199 98200 98201 98202 98203 98204 98205 98206 98207 98208 98209 98210 98211 98212 98213 98214 98215 98216 98217 98218 98219 98220 98221 98222 98224 98225 98226 98228 98229 98230 98232 98233 98234 98235 98236 98237 98238 98239

Street Name

Asset ID 98240 98241 98242 98243 98244 98245 98246 98247 98248 98249 98250 98252 98254 98255 98256 98257 98258 98259 98260 98262 98263 98265 98266 98268 98269 98270 98271 98272 98273 98274 98275 98276 98277 98278 98279 98280 98281 98282 98283 98284 98285 98286

Street Name

Intersection 1

Intersection 2

Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Wheatley Street Point Road Point Road Point Road Bedford Road Wheatley Street Point Road Sydenham William Street Amelia Street Amelia Street Bedford Road George Street Sydenham Church Street Sydenham Church Street Portland Avenue Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Bedford Road Sydenham Mill Street George Street Sydenham William Street George Street

DIAMETER LENGTH UNIT PRICE CONST USEFUL LIFE QUANTITY (mm) (m) ($) YEAR (YRS) 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19

HISTORIC COST

2022 Replacement Cost (inflation accounted)

*Replacement Cost ($/unit)

2022 Replacement Cost

REMAINING LIFE (YRS)

% Useful Life Remaining (based on age)

Condition/Probability of Consequence of Timing of First Failure (1 = good/not Failure (1 = low, Inst Year Useful Life Risk Replacement-Based likely, 5 = poor/likely) 5 = high) on Risk

Timing of First Replacement-Based on life cycle

Timing of First Replacement

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 2,768.47 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70 3,305.70

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 33 33 33 33 33

66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 66% 66% 66% 66% 66%

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2061 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000

60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 8,264.24 6,921.17 6,921.17 6,921.17 8,264.24

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45 8,195.45

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 50 50 50 44

73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 73% 83% 83% 83% 73%

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 8

2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2071 2071 2071 2065

Hydrants [ID(tag)] Point Rd Wheatley St Wheatley St Wheatley St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Stage Coach Rd Rutledge Rd George St George St George St Bedford Rd Bedford Rd Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Portland Ave Sydenham Walker Rd Sydenham Walker Rd Sydenham Church St Sydenham Church St Sydenham Church St Sydenham William St Sydenham William St Sydenham William St George St Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Mill St Brewery St Amelia St Rutledge Rd Rutledge Rd Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Morgan Dr Rutledge Rd

Point Road Wheatley Cross Wheatley Wheatley Rutledge Rutledge Wheatley Rutledge Stage-Coach Water Tower Stage-Coach Stage-Coach George Bridge Portland Bedford Bedford Bedford Church Church Church Church Church Church Walker Portland William Rutledge William Brewery Amelia Mill Cross Brewery Amelia Brewery Morgan Rutledge Morgan Morgan Morgan Stage-Coach

Halfway Point Wheatley Halfway Rutledge Halfway East End Rutledge Stage-Coach Halfway Stage-Coach South End Rutledge Wheatley Wheatley Bedford Halfway North End Portland Bedford Bedford Bedford Bedford Portland Walker West End Church Church William Brewery William William George Mill Mill Brewery Amelia Rutledge West End Rutledge Halfway Southend Rutledge

Page 298 of 470

96001 (1) 96002 (2) 96003 (3) 96004 (4) 96005 (5) 96006 (6) 96007 (7) 96008 (8) 96009 (9) 96010 (10) 96011 (11) 96012 (12) 96013 (13) 96014 (14) 96015 (15) 96016 (16) 96017 (17) 96018 (18) 96020 (20) 96021 (21) 96022 (22) 96023 (23) 96024 (24) 96025 (25) 96026 (26) 96027 (27) 96028 (28) 96029 (29) 96030 (30) 96031 (31) 96032 (32) 96033 (33) 96034 (34) 96035 (35) 96036 (36) 96037 (37) 96038 (38) 96039 (39) 96040 (40) 96041 (41) 96042 (42) 96043 (43) 96044 (44) Summary

Appendix E5 - Storm Sewers Storm Sewers PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

Construction Year

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

CSP

750

14.3

CSP

750

13.9

1973

CSP

450

8.5

1973

CSP

450

15.0

1973

CSP

450

22.3

1973

CSP

450

17.9

1973

CSP

450

10.0

1973

CSP

525

12.1

1973

CSP

600

34.1

1973

CSP

600

46.5

1973

CSP

600

24.8

1973

CSP

300

26.0

1973

CSP

300

31.5

1973

CSP

375

11.9

1973

CSP

375

24.4

1973

CSP

375

3.1

1973

CSP

375

91.0

CSP

375

42.8

1973

CSP

375

8.2

1973

CSP

375

14.5

1973

CSP

375

26.3

1973

CSP

375

12.3

1973

CSP

375

23.1

1973

CSP

375

11.2

1973

CSP

375

17.0

1973

CSP

375

47.7

1973

CSP

300

8.5

1975

CSP

750

39.7

1985

CSP

450

25.4

1985

CSP

450

1.1

1985

CSP

450

30.2

1985

CSP

450

8.0

1985

CSP

450

8.6

1985

CSP

450

104.0

1985

CSP

450

10.9

1985

CSP

450

54.4

1985

CSP

450

7.8

1985

CSP

500

6.2

1985

CSP

600

7.4

1985

CSP

300

11.1

1985

CSP

300

13.1

1985

CSP

300

12.8

1985

CSP

300

12.8

1985

CSP

300

13.6

1985

CSP

300

17.2

1985

CSP

350

17.5

1985

CSP

400

24.0

1985

CSP

400

9.2

1985

CSP

400

40.8

1985

CSP

400

3.0

1985

CSP

400

93.9

1985

CSP

400

1.4

1985

CSP

400

10.2

1985

CSP

200

2.3

1985

CSP

250

9.0

1985

CSP

450

109.7

1986

CSP

450

78.7

1986

CSP

450

85.2

1986

CSP

450

61.2

1986

CSP

450

67.4

1986

CSP

450

55.7

1986

CSP

450

17.2

1986

CSP

450

7.2

1986

CSP

450

33.9

CSP

450

52.7

1986

CSP

300

7.5

1986

CSP

300

3.3

1986

CSP

300

8.2

1986

CSP

300

8.4

1986

CSP

300

7.8

1986

CSP

300

5.5

1986

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$337.00 $337.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $291.00 $337.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $291.00 $291.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00

$690.00 $690.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $350.00 $690.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $320.00 $350.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement Risk, then lifecycle on Risk

PIPES 93504

Hartington‐ Road 38

93509

Hartington‐ Road 38

93510

Hartington‐ Road 38

93511

Hartington‐ Road 38

93512

Hartington‐ Road 38

93513

Hartington‐ Road 38

93524

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93501

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93500

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93502

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93503

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93506

Hartington‐ Road 38

93507

Hartington‐ Road 38

93517

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93518

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93519

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93520

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93521

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93522

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93523

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93525

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93526

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93527

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93528

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93529

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93530

Hartington‐ Boyce Road

93248

Verona‐ Road 38

93736

Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

93732

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93733

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93734

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93735

Harrowsmith‐ Maria St

93737

Harrowsmith‐Rutledge Rd

93738

Harrowsmith‐Rutledge Rd

93740

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93741

Harrowsmith‐ William St

93742

Harrowsmith‐ William St

93702

Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

93739

Harrowsmith‐Rutledge Rd

93701

Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

93712

Road 38

93714

Road38

93716

Road38

93718

Road38

93725

Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd

93703

Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

93723

Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd

93724

Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd

93727

Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd

93728

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93729

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93730

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93731

Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St

93726

Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd

93719

Road38

93974

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93976

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93978

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93980

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93997

Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham‐ Point Rd

94001

Sydenham‐ George St

93942

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93966

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St

93982

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93916

Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd

93973

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93975

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93979

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93981

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

93987

Sydenham‐ Wheatley St

1973

1986

9,867

1973

2024 to 2028

2023

2073

9,591

1973

2024 to 2028

2023

2073

3,825

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

6,750

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

10,035

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

8,055

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

4,500

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

5,687

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

18,073

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

24,645

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

13,144

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

9,100

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

11,025

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073 2073

2073

4,998

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

10,248

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

1,302

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

38,220

17,976

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

3,444

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

6,090

11,046

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

5,166

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

9,702

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

4,704

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

7,140

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

20,017

1973

2029 to 2033

2023

2073

2,975

1975

2029 to 2033

2025

2075

27,393

26%

1985

2024 to 2028

2035

2085

11,430

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

495

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

13,590

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

3,600

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

3,870

46,800

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

4,905

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

24,480

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

3,510

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

2,914

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

3,922

26%

1985

2029 to 2033

2035

2085

3,885

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

4,585

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

4,480

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

4,480

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

4,760

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

6,020

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

7,350

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

10,800

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085 2085

4,140

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

18,360

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

1,350

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

42,255

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

630

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

4,590

26%

1985

2034 to 2057

2035

2085

736

26%

1985

2058 to 2080

2035

2085

3,150

26%

1985

2058 to 2080

2035

2085

49,365

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

35,415

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

38,340

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

27,540

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

30,330

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

25,065

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

7,740

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

3,240

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

15,255

23,715

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

2,625

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

1,155

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

2,870

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

2,940

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

2,730

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

1,925

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

2086

28%

1986

2029 to 2033

2036

2086

Page 299 of 470

93998

Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Verona Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

94002

Sydenham‐ George St

94409

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94410

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94411

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94412

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94400

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94401

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94402

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94403

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94404

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94405

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94406

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94407

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

94408

Inverary‐ Perth Rd 10

93505

Hartington‐ Road 38

93514

Hartington‐ Road 38

93516

Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

93515

Hartington‐ Road 38

94819

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94820

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94821

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94802

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94814

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94822

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94804

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94805

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94806

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94815

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94816

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94823

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94824

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

93213

Verona‐ Water St

93215

Verona‐ Water St

93237

Verona‐ Road 38

93212

Verona‐ Water St

93236

Verona‐ Road 38

93234 93204 93206

Verona‐ Road 38

55485 55485

Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38

93216

Verona‐ Road 38

93229

Verona‐ Road 38

93232

Verona‐ Road 38

93239 93200 93201

Verona‐ Road 38

55485 55485

Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38

93224

Verona‐ Road 38

93226

Verona‐ Road 38

93228

Verona‐ Road 38

93238

Verona‐ Road 38

93250

Verona‐ Road 38

93244

Verona‐ Road 38

93252

Verona‐ Road 38

93253 93202 93203 93205 93207 93208 93209 93211

Verona‐ Road 38

55485 45700 55485 55485 46360 46360 55485

Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Sand Rd Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Walker St Verona‐ Walker St Verona‐ Road 38

93214

Verona‐ Water St

93218

Verona‐ Road 38

93219

Verona‐ Road 38

93220

Verona‐ Genge St

93221

Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Bank St

93223

Verona‐ Road 38

93225

Verona‐ Road 38

93227

Verona‐ Road 38

93230

Verona‐ Road 38

93231

Verona‐ Road 38

93233

Verona‐ Road 38

93235

Verona‐ Road 38

93240

Verona‐ Road 38

Sydenham Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

CSP

300

7.6

1986

CSP

500

95.4

1993

CSP

500

40.0

1993

CSP

500

6.9

1993

CSP

500

22.5

CSP

600

27.4

1993

CSP

600

8.3

1993

CSP

600

85.7

1993

CSP

600

8.7

1993

CSP

600

90.3

1993

CSP

600

8.2

1993

CSP

600

57.1

1993

CSP

600

8.0

1993

CSP

600

7.1

1993

Concrete

1993

450

83.6

Concrete

450

36.0

1973

HDPE

300

9.5

1973

Concrete

250

15.3

1973

CSP

500

7.9

2004

CSP

500

20.2

2004

CSP

500

19.7

2004

CSP

500

5.0

2004

CSP

400

24.1

2004

CSP

400

111.7

2004

CSP

400

105.3

2004

CSP

400

9.1

2004

CSP

400

107.3

CSP

400

35.4

2004

CSP

400

8.4

2004

CSP

400

2004

37.0

2004

CSP

400

8.3

2004

HDPE

750

57.8

1975

HDPE

750

73.5

1975

HDPE

750

7.4

1975

Concrete

900

40.4

1975

Concrete

900

44.2

1975

HDPE

450

36.0

1975

HDPE

525

58.7

1975

HDPE

525

100.1

1975

HDPE

525

64.8

1975

HDPE

525

44.6

1975

HDPE

525

79.7

1975

HDPE

525

9.0

1975

HDPE

600

5.6

1975

HDPE

600

41.4

1975

HDPE

600

9.7

1975

HDPE

600

42.0

1975

HDPE

600

43.6

1975

HDPE

600

41.0

1975

HDPE

600

44.7

1975

Concrete

300

5.4

1975

Concrete

300

19.4

1975

Concrete

300

16.1

1975

HDPE

300

12.2

1975

HDPE

300

10.0

1975

HDPE

300

8.1

1975

HDPE

300

8.2

1975

HDPE

300

7.3

1975

HDPE

300

7.9

1975

HDPE

300

8.1

1975

HDPE

300

5.9

1975

HDPE

300

86.6

1975

HDPE

300

3.7

1975

HDPE

300

7.5

1975

HDPE

300

12.5

1975

HDPE

300

8.0

1975

HDPE

300

3.9

1975

HDPE

300

8.4

1975

HDPE

300

8.3

1975

HDPE

300

3.0

1975

HDPE

300

8.6

1975

HDPE

300

8.3

1975

HDPE

300

5.6

1975

HDPE

300

7.4

1975

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$291.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $312.00 $312.00 $291.00 $291.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $312.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00

$350.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $450.00 $450.00 $350.00 $350.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $690.00 $690.00 $690.00 $870.00 $870.00 $450.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

2,660

28%

1986

2034 to 2057

2036

44,838

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

18,800

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

3,243

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

10,575

14,522

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

4,399

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2086 2093

2093

45,421

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

4,611

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

47,859

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

4,346

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

30,263

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

4,240

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

3,763

42%

1993

2034 to 2057

2043

2093

37,620

16,200

39%

1973

2034 to 2057

2053

3,325

39%

1973

2058 to 2080

2053

5,355

39%

1973

2081 to 2084

2053

3,713

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

9,494

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

9,259

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

2,350

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

10,845

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

50,265

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

47,385

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

4,095

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

48,285

15,930

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

3,780

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

39%

64%

1973

2004

2034 to 2057

2058 to 2080

2053

2054

2104

16,650

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

3,735

64%

2004

2058 to 2080

2054

2104

39,882

41%

1975

2029 to 2033

2055

50,715

41%

1975

2029 to 2033

2055

5,106

41%

1975

2029 to 2033

2055

35,148

41%

1975

2029 to 2033

2055

38,454

41%

1975

2029 to 2033

2055

16,200

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

27,589

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

47,047

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

30,456

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

20,962

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

37,459

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

4,230

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

2,968

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

21,942

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

5,141

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

22,260

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

23,108

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

21,730

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

23,691

41%

1975

2034 to 2057

2055

1,890

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

6,790

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

5,635

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

4,270

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,500

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,835

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,870

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,555

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,765

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,835

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,065

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

30,310

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

1,295

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,625

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

4,375

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,800

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

1,365

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,940

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,905

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

1,050

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,010

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,905

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

1,960

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,590

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

Page 300 of 470

93222

VILLAGE

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

93243 93246 93247 93251 93255 93256 93258 93259 93261 93262 93263 93264 93265 93210 93217 93241 93242 93245 93254 93257 93260 93249 94229 94230 94231 94232 94233 94234 94235 94228 94833 93713 93715 93717 93720 93721 93722 93915 93917 93971 93999 93956 93960 93964 93938 93957 93958 93962 93989 93937 93949 93984 94000 93945 93967 93972 93977 93988 93925 93943 93944 93952 93953 93954 93918 93969 93983 93985 93986 93950 93951 93955 93959

VILLAGE

Verona Verona Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Verona‐ Road 38 Verona Perth Road‐ Perth Rd 10 Perth Road Village Perth Road‐ Perth Rd 10 Perth Road Village Shales/Opp‐ Shales Rd Perth Road Village Shales/Opp‐ Shales Rd Perth Road Village Shales/Opp‐ Opinicon Rd Perth Road Village Shales/Opp‐ Opinicon Rd Perth Road Village Shales/Opp‐ Opinicon Rd Perth Road Village Perth Road‐ Perth Rd 10 Perth Road Village Batersea‐ Wellington St Battersea Road38 Harrowsmith Road38 Harrowsmith Road38 Harrowsmith Road38 Harrowsmith Road38 Harrowsmith Road38 Harrowsmith Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ George St (Bank Outlet) Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham Sydenham‐ Amelia St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St Sydenham Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

Verona‐ Road 38

HDPE

300

7.3

1975

Verona‐ Road 38

HDPE

300

3.3

1975

Verona‐ Road 38

HDPE

300

9.2

1975

HDPE

300

9.0

1975

HDPE

300

8.6

1975

HDPE

300

11.9

1975

HDPE

300

9.2

1975

HDPE

300

6.1

1975

HDPE

300

15.7

1975

HDPE

300

18.1

1975

HDPE

300

8.2

1975

HDPE

300

8.1

1975

PVC

300

35.6

1975

HDPE

375

50.0

1975

HDPE

375

8.4

1975

HDPE

375

22.8

1975

HDPE

375

21.3

1975

HDPE

375

45.4

1975

HDPE

375

35.8

1975

HDPE

375

43.3

1975

HDPE

375

40.9

1975

PVC

375

10.7

1975

CSP

500

12.2

2012

CSP

500

4.4

2012

CSP

500

15.0

2012

CSP

500

3.4

2012

CSP

500

13.0

2012

CSP

500

16.3

2012

CSP

500

55.5

2012

CSP

600

17.0

2012

CSP

300

21.9

2013

Concrete

500

81.2

1985

Concrete

500

75.6

1985

Concrete

500

67.5

1985

Concrete

500

39.0

1985

Concrete

300

18.9

1985

Concrete

300

16.1

1985

HDPE

450

46.4

1986

HDPE

450

65.2

1986

HDPE

450

6.7

1986

HDPE

450

21.7

1986

HDPE

450

9.5

1986

HDPE

450

71.5

1986

HDPE

450

36.3

1986

HDPE

525

21.2

1986

HDPE

525

25.4

1986

HDPE

525

66.0

1986

PVC

525

74.6

1986

HDPE

600

19.6

1986

HDPE

600

23.6

1986

PVC

600

62.6

1986

PVC

600

59.6

1986

PVC

600

21.7

1986

HDPE

300

3.6

1986

HDPE

300

13.0

1986

HDPE

300

11.1

1986

HDPE

300

10.9

1986

HDPE

300

2.0

1986

HDPE

300

6.7

1986

HDPE

300

6.3

1986

HDPE

300

3.7

PVC

300

37.1

1986

PVC

300

8.0

1986

PVC

300

54.5

1986

PVC

300

8.2

1986

PVC

300

7.8

1986

PVC

300

44.8

1986

PVC

300

3.2

1986

PVC

300

4.2

1986

PVC

300

7.9

1986

PVC

300

124.3

1986

PVC

300

7.5

1986

PVC

300

6.8

1986

PVC

300

7.8

1986

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $291.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $291.00 $291.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00

$350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $350.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $350.00 $350.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

2,555

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

1,155

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,220

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,150

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,010

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

4,165

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,220

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,135

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

5,495

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

6,335

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,870

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

2,835

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

12,460

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

21,000

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

3,528

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

9,576

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

8,946

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

19,068

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

15,036

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

18,186

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

17,178

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

4,494

41%

1975

2058 to 2080

2055

5,734

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

2,068

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

7,050

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

1,598

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

6,110

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

7,661

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

26,085

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

9,010

80%

2012

2081 to 2084

2062

2112

7,665

82%

2013

2081 to 2084

2063

2113

38,164

54%

1985

2034 to 2057

2065

35,532

54%

1985

2034 to 2057

2065

31,725

54%

1985

2034 to 2057

2065

18,330

54%

1985

2034 to 2057

2065

6,615

54%

1985

2058 to 2080

2065

2055

5,635

54%

1985

2058 to 2080

2065

20,880

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

29,340

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

3,015

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

9,765

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066 2066

4,275

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

32,175

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

16,335

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

9,964

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

11,938

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

31,020

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

35,062

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

10,388

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

12,508

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

33,178

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

31,588

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

11,501

55%

1986

2034 to 2057

2066

1,260

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

4,550

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

3,885

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

3,815

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

700

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,345

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,205

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

1,295

12,985

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,800

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

19,075

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,870

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,730

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

15,680

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

1,120

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

1,470

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,765

43,505

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,625

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,380

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,730

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

Page 301 of 470

93968

55485

LOCATION

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

MATERIAL

Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Inverary Inverary Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea

PVC

300

7.5

1986

PVC

300

7.5

1986

PVC

300

13.4

1986

HDPE

375

9.2

1986

HDPE

375

77.3

1986

HDPE

375

6.7

1986

HDPE

375

9.8

1986

HDPE

375

113.6

1986

HDPE

375

2.3

1986

HDPE

375

9.3

1986

HDPE

375

10.3

1986

HDPE

375

2.3

1986

HDPE

375

67.5

1986

HDPE

375

19.8

1986

HDPE

375

11.7

1986

HDPE

375

1.9

1986

HDPE

375

100.8

1986

HDPE

375

6.8

1986

HDPE

375

12.5

1986

HDPE

375

16.8

HDPE

375

42.4

1986

HDPE

375

8.5

1986

HDPE

375

79.8

1986

HDPE

375

17.2

1986

PVC

250

3.2

1986

93961

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St

93965

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St

93923

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Church St

93931

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93932

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93947

Sydenham‐ Amelia St

93919

Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd

93933

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93922

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Church St

93924

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93926

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93927

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93928

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93929

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93930

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93934

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93935

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93936

Sydenham‐ Brewery St

93939

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93940

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93941

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

93946

Sydenham‐ Amelia St

93948

Sydenham‐ Amelia St

93970

Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St

94413

Inverary‐ Latimer Rd

94414

Inverary‐ Latimer Rd

94810

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94811

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94818

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94813

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94800

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94801

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94812

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94817

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94807

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94809

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94808

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94803

Battersea‐ Battersea Rd

94204

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94205

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94206

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94207

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94209

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94216

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94217

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94210

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94212

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94213

Perth Road‐ Perth Road

94211

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94200

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94201

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94203

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94208

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94227

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94202

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94214

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94215

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94224

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94225

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94226

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94218

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94219

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94220

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94221

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94222

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94223

Perth Road‐ Perth Road Crescent

94832

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94830

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94831

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94828

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94838

Batersea‐ Water St

94835

Battersea‐ Battersea Cross St

94837

Batersea‐ Wellington St

LENGTH (m)

1986

PVC

300

15.8

HDPE

375

11.6

1993

HDPE

650

3.9

2004

1993

HDPE

650

7.2

2004

Concrete

500

14.8

2004

PVC

500

2.0

2004

HDPE

525

6.9

2004

HDPE

525

7.1

2004

PVC

600

14.0

2004

Concrete

300

17.8

2004

300

7.2

2004

PVC HDPE

375

7.8

2004

PVC

400

107.0

2004

PVC

400

7.9

2004

HDPE

525

19.4

HDPE

525

18.0

2012

HDPE

525

7.0

2012

HDPE

525

6.9

2012

HDPE

525

17.7

2012

HDPE

525

26.2

2012

HDPE

525

34.6

2012

HDPE

600

12.9

2012

HDPE

600

35.3

2012

HDPE

600

22.9

2012

HDPE

600

24.7

2012

HDPE

300

12.3

2012

HDPE

300

25.5

2012

HDPE

300

5.7

2012

HDPE

300

17.3

2012

HDPE

300

9.0

2012

HDPE

300

20.8

2012

HDPE

300

29.3

2012

HDPE

300

18.1

2012

HDPE

375

23.2

2012

HDPE

375

5.6

2012

HDPE

375

8.6

2012

HDPE

375

35.4

2012

HDPE

375

58.2

2012

HDPE

375

4.6

2012

HDPE

375

9.4

2012

HDPE

375

13.6

2012

HDPE

375

13.5

2012

HDPE

525

6.0

2013

PVC

525

26.1

2013

PVC

525

7.4

2013

PVC

600

34.2

2013

HDPE

300

26.8

2013

PVC

300

41.2

2013

PVC

300

7.5

2013

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $337.00 $337.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00

$350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $530.00 $530.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

2,625

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,625

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

4,690

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

3,864

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

32,466

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,814

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

4,116

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

47,712

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

966

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

3,906

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066 2066

4,326

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

966

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

28,350

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

8,316

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

4,914

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

798

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

42,336

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

2,856

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

5,250

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

7,056

17,808

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

3,570

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

33,516

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

7,224

55%

1986

2058 to 2080

2066

1,120

55%

1986

2081 to 2084

2066

5,530

64%

1993

2058 to 2080

2073

4,872

64%

1993

2058 to 2080

2073

2,067

78%

2004

2034 to 2057

2084

3,816

78%

2004

2034 to 2057

2084 2084

6,956

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

940

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

3,243

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

3,337

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

7,420

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

6,230

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

2,520

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084 2084

3,276

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

48,150

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

3,555

78%

2004

2058 to 2080

2084

9,118

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

8,460

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

3,290

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

3,243

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

8,319

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

12,314

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

16,262

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

6,837

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

18,709

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

12,137

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

13,091

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

4,305

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

8,925

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

1,995

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

6,055

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

3,150

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

7,280

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

10,255

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

6,335

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

9,744

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

2,352

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

3,612

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

14,868

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

24,444

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

1,932

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

3,948

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

5,712

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092

5,670

88%

2012

2081 to 2084

2092 2093

2092

2,820

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

12,267

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

3,478

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

18,126

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

9,380

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

14,420

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

2,625

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

Page 302 of 470

VILLAGE

93963

DIAMETER (mm)

Construction Year

LOCATION

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

94826

Battsea‐ Battersea Water St

94827

Battsea‐ Battersea Water St

94829

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94836

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94834

Batersea‐ Wellington St

94825

Battsea‐ Battersea Water St

93900

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93908

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93901

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93911

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93903

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93992

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93991

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93905

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93910

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93913

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93914

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93920

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93990

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93993

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93995

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93996

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93921

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93907

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93902

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93904

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93906

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93909

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93912

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93994

Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd

93000 93007 93003 93005 93015 93016 93017 93018 93001 93002 93004 93006 93008 93009 93010 93011 93012 93013 93014 93019

44065 44065 44065 44065 40435 40435 40435 40435 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 44065 40435

Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Bellrock Mill St Bellrock‐ Bellrock Mill St Bellrock‐ Bellrock Mill St Bellrock‐ Bellrock Mill St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Bellrock Mill St Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

93748

Robinson Road

93749

Robinson Road

93750

Robinson Road

94030

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94039

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94041

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94042

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94043

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

93711

Road38

94016

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94017

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

93706

Road38

93710

Road38

94019

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94021

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94023

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94029

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

93743

Harrowsmith‐ Road 38

93704

Road38

93705

Road38

93707

Road38

93708

Road38

93709

Road38

Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith

MATERIAL

Construction Year

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

PVC

300

20.3

2013

PVC

300

7.5

2013

PVC

300

8.7

2013

PVC

300

13.8

2013

PVC

400

34.0

2013

PVC

400

8.3

2013

HDPE

750

82.2

2014

PVC

450

2.3

2014

PVC

450

2.0

2014

PVC

450

2.2

2014

PVC

450

2.8

2014

HDPE

525

45.7

2014

HDPE

600

16.5

2014

PVC

600

75.6

2014

PVC

600

97.2

2014

PVC

600

91.6

2014

PVC

600

14.6

2014

HDPE

300

2.3

2014

HDPE

300

2.0

2014

HDPE

300

11.5

2014

HDPE

300

31.9

2014

HDPE

300

7.6

2014

HDPE

300

126.0

2014

PVC

300

19.9

2014

PVC

300

8.1

2014

PVC

300

8.1

2014

PVC

300

4.1

2014

PVC

300

7.9

2014

PVC

300

7.9

2014

HDPE

375

47.5

2014

HDPE

450

4.4

2015

HDPE

450

41.1

2015

HDPE

525

93.9

2015

HDPE

300

6.6

2015

HDPE

300

11.7

2015

HDPE

300

20.5

HDPE

300

25.5

2015

PVC

300

5.8

2015

HDPE

375

10.1

2015

HDPE

375

0.9

2015

HDPE

375

5.9

2015

HDPE

375

87.6

2015

HDPE

375

3.2

2015

HDPE

375

6.1

2015

HDPE

375

8.6

2015

HDPE

375

25.6

2015

HDPE

375

4.8

2015

HDPE

375

9.6

2015

HDPE

375

2015

8.4

2015

PVC

250

6.4

2015

HDPE

300

18.0

2017

HDPE

300

25.5

2017

HDPE

300

7.5

2017

HDPE

300

19.2

2017

HDPE

1050

8.3

2018

HDPE

1050

5.7

2018

HDPE

1050

12.1

2018

HDPE

1050

26.9

2018

HDPE

1050

38.4

2018

Concrete

500

44.6

2018

HDPE

525

8.6

2018

HDPE

525

53.3

2018

HDPE

600

33.3

2018

HDPE

600

26.7

2018

HDPE

600

20.8

2018

HDPE

600

74.4

2018

HDPE

600

131.6

2018

HDPE

600

69.8

2018

HDPE

300

14.5

2018

HDPE

300

13.0

2018

HDPE

300

2.4

2018

HDPE

300

3.4

2018

HDPE

300

11.1

2018

HDPE

300

9.6

2018

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $312.00 $312.00 $337.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $312.00 $312.00 $328.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $337.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00

$350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $450.00 $450.00 $690.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $450.00 $450.00 $470.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $975.00 $975.00 $975.00 $975.00 $975.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

7,105

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

2,625

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

3,045

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

4,830

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

15,300

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

3,735

89%

2013

2081 to 2084

2093

56,718

90%

2014

2058 to 2080

2094

1,035

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

900

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

990

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

1,260

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

21,479

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

8,745

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

40,068

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

51,516

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

48,548

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

7,738

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

805

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

700

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

4,025

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

11,165

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

2,660

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

44,100

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

6,965

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

2,835

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

2,835

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

1,435

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

2,765

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

2,765

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

19,950

90%

2014

2081 to 2084

2094

1,980

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

18,495

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

44,133

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,310

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

4,095

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

7,175

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

8,925

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,030

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

4,242

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

378

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,478

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

36,792

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

1,344

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,562

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

3,612

10,752

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,016

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

4,032

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

3,528

91%

2015

2081 to 2084

2095

2,240

91%

2015

2084

2095

6,300

94%

2017

2081 to 2084

2097

8,925

94%

2017

2081 to 2084

2097

2,625

94%

2017

2081 to 2084

2097

6,720

94%

2017

2081 to 2084

2097

8,093

95%

2018

2058 to 2080

2098

5,558

95%

2018

2058 to 2080

2098

11,798

95%

2018

2058 to 2080

2098

26,228

95%

2018

2058 to 2080

2098

37,440

95%

2018

2058 to 2080

2098

20,962

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

4,042

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

25,051

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

17,649

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

14,151

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

11,024

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

39,432

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

69,748

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

36,994

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

5,075

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

4,550

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

840

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

1,190

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

3,885

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

3,360

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

Page 303 of 470

93700

VILLAGE

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

93744

Road38

93745

Road38

93746

Road38

93747

Road38

Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury

93751

Road38

94018

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94022

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94006

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94010

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94028

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94032

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94038

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94044

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

94045

Sydenham‐ Sydenham William St

94035

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94040

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

93752

Road38

93753

Road38

94008

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94009

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94014

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94015

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94025

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94026

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94027

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94031

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94033

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94034

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94036

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94037

Sydenham‐ Portland Ave

94003

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94004

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94007

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94011

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94012

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94013

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94020

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94024

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94005

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

94616

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94600

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94601

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94603

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94619

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94613

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94614

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94615

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94602

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94604

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94606

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94608

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94609

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94610

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94611

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94612

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94617

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94618

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94620

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94605

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94607

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

94621

Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

PIPES TOTAL

MATERIAL

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

2020

$291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $295.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $328.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $332.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $291.00 $295.00 $295.00 $291.00

$350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $420.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $470.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $530.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $420.00 $420.00 $320.00

1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973

$4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00

$6,200.00 $6,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

Construction Year

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

HDPE

300

44.6

HDPE

300

50.5

2018

HDPE

300

8.5

2018

HDPE

300

22.5

2018

HDPE

300

8.2

2018

PVC

300

2.5

2018

PVC

300

1.0

2018

HDPE

375

11.8

2018

HDPE

375

15.7

2018

HDPE

375

9.3

2018

HDPE

375

56.0

2018

HDPE

375

74.0

2018

HDPE

375

33.9

2018

HDPE

375

24.7

2018

HDPE

375

60.8

2018

HDPE

375

35.0

2018

HDPE

200

9.2

2018

HDPE

200

9.2

2018

HDPE

200

10.0

2018

HDPE

200

5.9

2018

HDPE

200

8.8

2018

HDPE

200

67.1

2018

HDPE

200

6.1

2018

HDPE

200

2.2

2018

HDPE

200

36.6

2018

HDPE

200

7.4

2018

HDPE

200

2.9

2018

HDPE

200

2.8

2018

HDPE

200

2.5

2018

HDPE

200

4.2

2018

PVC

200

6.3

2018

PVC

200

4.9

2018

PVC

200

5.7

2018

PVC

200

2.0

2018

PVC

200

10.3

2018

PVC

200

13.9

2018

PVC

200

9.0

2018

PVC

200

8.3

2018

PVC

200

5.7

2018

HDPE PVC PVC PVC HDPE PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC PVC HDPE

525 525 525 525 600 600 600 600 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 375 375 200

21.3 23.4 8.1 107.7 20.8 4.6 16 21.5 90.7 7.7 9.97 9.18 58.62 8.96 5.81 5.81 12.4 12.6 3 73.67 65.46 50

2020

302

10.7

2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age) 95%

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 2

Inst Year 2018

Useful Life 80

Risk 2

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

15,610

17,675

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

2,975

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

7,875

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

2,870

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

875

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

350

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

4,956

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

6,594

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

3,885

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

23,520

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

31,080

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

14,238

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

10,374

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

25,536

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

14,700

95%

2018

2081 to 2084

2098

2,944

95%

2018

2084

2098

2,944

95%

2018

2084

2098

3,200

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,888

95%

2018

2084

2098 2098

2,816

95%

2018

2084

21,472

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,952

95%

2018

2084

2098

704

11,712

95%

2018

2084

2098

2,368

95%

2018

2084

2098

928

95%

2018

2084

2098

896

95%

2018

2084

2098

800

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,344

95%

2018

2084

2098

2,016

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,568

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,824

95%

2018

2084

2098

640

95%

2018

2084

2098

3,296

95%

2018

2084

2098

4,448

95%

2018

2084

2098

2,880

95%

2018

2084

2098

2,656

95%

2018

2084

2098

1,824

95%

2018

2084

2098

10,011

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

10,998

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100 2100

3,807

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

50,619

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

11,024

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

2,438

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

8,480

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

11,395

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

31,745

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

2,695

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

3,490

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

3,213

20,517

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

3,136

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

2,034

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

2,034

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

4,340

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

4,410

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

1,050

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

30,941

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

27,493

98%

2020

2081 to 2084

2100

16,000

98%

2020

2084

2100

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

6,200.00 6,200.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00

40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973

80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

9 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053

STRUCTURES Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Holleford Rd Hartington‐ Holleford Rd Hartington‐ Holleford Rd

Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington

MH MH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB

1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600

Page 304 of 470

90502 90506 90503 90504 90505 90507 90508 90509 90510 90514 90515 90516

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Boyce Rd Hartington‐ Road 38 Hartington‐ Holleford Rd Hartington‐ Holleford Rd Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Water St Verona‐ Water St Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Verona Sands Rd Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Walker St Verona‐ Water St Verona‐ Genge St Verona‐ Genge St Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Verona Sands Rd Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Walker St Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Bank St Verona‐ Bank St Verona‐ Water St Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Carleton St Verona‐ Road 38 Carleton St Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Verona‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd

Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Hartington Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Verona Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith

CB CB CB CB CB CB DI DI DI DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH MH MH MH MH DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB MH MH MH CB

600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1973 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1975 1985 1985 1985 1985

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,200.00

$3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $3,500.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 3,500.00

40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 43% 55% 55% 55% 55%

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 3

2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2053 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2055 2065 2065 2065 2065

Page 305 of 470

90517 90518 90519 90520 90521 90522 90500 90501 90511 90512 90513 90201 90204 90206 90210 90216 90218 90224 90226 90228 90229 90232 90234 90238 90239 90241 90242 90245 90250 90254 90257 90260 90212 90213 90215 90236 90202 90207 90209 90214 90219 90220 90225 90233 90237 90247 90200 90203 90205 90208 90211 90217 90221 90222 90223 90227 90230 90231 90235 90240 90243 90244 90246 90248 90249 90251 90252 90253 90255 90256 90258 90259 90261 90262 90263 90264 90265 90702 90714 90730 90700

SEGMENT ID

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd Harrowsmith‐ Kingston Rd Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith‐ Colebrook Rd Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St Harrowsmith‐Notre Dame St Harrowsmith‐Notre Dame St Harrowsmith‐Notre Dame St Harrowsmith‐Maria St Harrowsmith‐Maria St Harrowsmith‐ Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith‐ Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith‐ Harrowsmith Rd Harrowsmith‐ Notre Dame St Harrowsmith‐ William St Harrowsmith‐ William St Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Amelia St Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Amelia St Sydenham‐ Amelia St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Cross St Sydenahm‐ George St Sydenahm‐ George St Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham‐ Stage Coach Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Sydenham Church St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ Brewery St Sydenham‐ William St

Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham

CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH MH MH DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB

600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1500 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $7,500.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00

$3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $8,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 8,900.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00

55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56%

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2065 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066

Page 306 of 470

90701 90703 90708 90709 90710 90711 90712 90713 90715 90716 90717 90720 90721 90722 90723 90724 90725 90726 90727 90728 90729 90731 90732 90733 90734 90735 90736 90718 90719 90901 90903 90908 90911 90921 90925 90929 90932 90935 90936 90944 90947 90948 90954 90955 90956 90958 90960 90962 90963 90979 90968 90981 90922 90926 90945 90946 90965 90974 90998 90997 90902 90904 90907 90909 90912 90914 90915 90916 90917 90918 90919 90920 90923 90924 90927 90928 90930 90931 90933 90934 90937

SEGMENT ID

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Amelia St Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Sydenham Mill St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Wheatley St Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham‐ Point Rd Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ William St Sydenham‐ Point Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Inverary‐ Latimer Rd Shales/Opp‐ Perth Rd Shales/Opp‐ Shales Rd Shales/Opp‐ Shales Rd Shales/Opp‐ Shales Rd Shales/Opp‐ Opinicon Rd Shales/Opp‐ Opinicon Rd Inverary‐ Latimer Rd Inverary‐ Latimer Rd Inverary‐ Perth Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Rd Battersea‐ Battersea Water St

Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Inverary Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Inverary Inverary Inverary Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea

CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI CBMH

600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 1993 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2011

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00

$3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 6,400.00

56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 56% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 79% 88%

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3

2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2073 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2084 2091

Page 307 of 470

90938 90939 90942 90943 90949 90950 90951 90952 90953 90957 90959 90961 90964 90966 90967 90969 90970 90971 90972 90973 90975 90976 90977 90978 90980 90982 90983 90984 90985 90993 90994 90995 91040 90940 90941 90996 91400 91401 91402 91403 91404 91405 91406 91407 91409 91410 91411 91412 91227 91228 91229 91230 91231 91232 91413 91414 91408 91817 91818 91821 91822 91800 91801 91802 91803 91810 91811 91812 91804 91805 91806 91807 91808 91809 91814 91815 91816 91819 91820 91813 91823

SEGMENT ID

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Battersea‐ Battersea Water St Battersea‐ Battersea Water St Battersea‐ Battersea Water St Battersea‐Water St Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Perth Rd‐ Perth Rd Cres Private Yard Battersea‐ Wellington St Battersea‐ Wellington St Battersea‐ Wellington St Battersea‐ Wellington St Private Yard Private Yard Battersea‐ Wellington St Battersea‐ Battersea Cross St Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenham‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Sydenahm‐ Rutledge Rd Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Leveque Rd Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Mill St Bellrock‐ Main St Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Robinson Rd Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd

Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Sydenham Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Sydenham Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Perth Road Village Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Battersea Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Bellrock Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham

CBMH CB CB DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH MH MH DCB DCBMH DCBMH CB CB DI DI DI DI DI DI DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH DCB CB CB CB CB DI CBMH CBMH MH MH DCB CB CB CB CB CB CBMH CBMH MH DCB DCB DCB DCBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH

1200 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1500 1500 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1500 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1800 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1800 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$4,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $7,500.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00

$6,400.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $5,800.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $8,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

6,400.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 5,800.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 8,900.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00

88% 88% 88% 88% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 89% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 91% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

3 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

2091 2091 2091 2091 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2092 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2093 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2094 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2095 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098

Page 308 of 470

91824 91825 91826 91836 91201 91204 91207 91209 91210 91211 91212 91213 91215 91217 91219 91222 91223 91224 91205 91216 90905 91206 91218 91200 91203 90906 91202 91208 91214 91220 91221 91225 91226 91827 91828 91832 91834 91829 91830 91831 91835 91833 90986 90988 90900 90910 90913 90987 90989 90990 90991 90992 90003 90006 90011 90001 90002 90008 90009 90004 90005 90012 90013 90014 90015 90016 90017 90018 90010 90705 90744 90749 90999 91012 91013 91015 91017 91019 91021 91023 91028

SEGMENT ID

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

SEGMENT ID

91029 91032 91001 91035 91038 91039 90704 90737 90741 90748 90742 91030 90706 90707 90738 90739 90743 90745 90746 90747 91000 91003 91004 91005 91007 91008 91009 91014 91016 91020 91024 91025 91026 91027 91033 91034 91036 91037 90740 91006 91010 91011 91018 91022 91608 91613 91614 91615 91600 91603 91605 91607 91612 91616 91601 91602 91604 91606 91611 91609 91617 91618

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

LOCATION

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Harrowsmith‐ Wilton Rd Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Wilton Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Harrowsmith‐ Robinson Rd Harrowsmith‐ Robinson Rd Harrowsmith‐ Wilton Rd Harrowsmith‐ Wilton Rd Sydenham‐ George St Sydenham‐ Beford Rd Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Harrowsmith‐ Road 38 Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sydenham‐ Bedford Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Harrowsmith Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sydenham Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury Sunbury

CBMH CBMH MH MH MH MH DCB DCB DCB DCB DCBMH DCBMH CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB DI DI DI DI DI DI CBMH CBMH CBMH CBMH DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCB DCBMH DCBMH DCBMH DCBMH DCBMH CB CB CB

1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1800 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1800 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1200 x 600 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 600 x 600 600 x 600 600 x 600

2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020

Bellrock‐ Main St Bellrock‐ Main St Sydenham‐ Portland Ave Sunbury‐ Battersea Rd

Bellrock Bellrock Sydenham Sunbury

Stormceptor Stormceptor Stormceptor Stormceptor

1800 1500 2400 1800

2015 2015 2018 2020

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

$4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00

$6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $5,800.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

6,400.00 6,400.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 6,200.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 5,800.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 8,900.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00

96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 96% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

$40,345.00 $37,750.00 $43,367.00 $32,283.00

$ $ $ $

55,000.00 50,000.00 65,000.00 55,000.00

88% 88% 94% 98%

1 1 1 1

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1

2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2098 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100

2015 2015 2018 2020

50 50 50 50

5 5 5 5

based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle based on life cycle

2065 2065 2068 2070

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ASSETS 90000 90007 91002 91610

5 5 5

2115 2115 2118 2120

CULVERTS <3m Culvert #9 (Devil Lake Rd) Latimer Road Culvert Moreland‐Dixon Culvert Bear Creek Culvert Bunker Hill Road Green Bay Road Culvert Culvert #10 (James Wilson) Otter Lake Culvert

1960 1960 1970 2009 2012 2013 2013 2016

$ 40,321.63 $ 154,730.14 $ 216,359.95 $ 435,998.07 $ 100,804.07 $ 138,229.97 $ 67,202.71 $ 380,269.00

6 3 8 8 3 3 3 3

63420

Burnt Hills Rd. Boss Marsh Culvert

2019

$ 414,362.08

64008 63430

Hinchenbrooke Road N Culvert Stafford Lane Culvert

2020 2021

$ 190,918.00 $ 321,243.61

3 3

Page 309 of 470

64009 64004 64002 63030 63240 63260 64010 63100

PIPE/STRUCTURE ID

64005 64001 64007

PIPES AND STRUCTURES TOTAL

SEGMENT ID

LOCATION

North Shore Road Perth Road Culvert Cul #7 (Westport Rd at Wolfe Lk)

VILLAGE

MATERIAL

DIAMETER (mm)

LENGTH (m)

Construction Year

2022 2014 2016

Structural Operational Grade Grade

Unit Cost (2019)

Unit Cost (Replacement) 2022

Condition/Probability of % Useful Life Replacement Failure (1 = good/not Remaining (based Value Estimate likely, 5 = poor/likely) on age)

$ 304,829.00 $ 189,750.00 $ 236,029.03

Consequence of Failure (1 = low, 5 = high)

Inst Year

Useful Life

Risk

Timing of First Timing of First Timing of Second Replacement‐Based Replacement Based on Replacement on Risk Risk, then lifecycle

3 4 4

$ 10,194,159

Page 310 of 470

Page 311 of 470

Township of South Frontenac Asset Management Plan Update Core Assets – December 2023

Page 312 of 470 Page |2

Section 3.0 – Transportation (Roads and Bridges) Section 4.0 - Drinking Water System Section 5.0 - Stormwater Management

Each section of the AMP sets out the following information:       

Asset Management Plan

Page 313 of 470 Page |3

Figure EX.1 – Overall Core Asset Cost Distribution

Asset Value Distribution

Bridges & Culverts, $45,043,714 Water Facilities, $8,372,183 Water Mains, $4,847,116 Storm Sewers, $10,194,159

Roads, $267,210,200

Figure EX.2 – Overall Core Asset Condition Asset Condition 45%

$160,000,000

Replacement Value

$140,000,000 $120,000,000

28%

$100,000,000 $80,000,000

16%

$60,000,000 $40,000,000

Poor

Critical

$20,000,000 $0 Excellent

Good

Fair Asset Condition

Like most municipalities across Ontario, a portion of the assets are in poor or very poor condition. These assets should be addressed on a priority basis using a risk-based Asset Management Plan

Page 314 of 470 Page |4

Figure EX.3 – Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution

Asset Management Plan

Page 315 of 470 Page |5

Table of Contents ES Executive Summary………………………………………………… 1.

Introduction………………………………………………………….. 11 1.1

Purpose of the Plan……………………………………………………….

1.2

Alignment with Other Township Policies………………………………

1.3

Strategic Plan 2023 – 2026……………………………………………..

1.4

Changes in Growth in Population………………………………………

Asset Management Plan, Framework and Methodology…….

2.1

Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan……………………………..

2.2

Stakeholders in the Updates of the AM Plan………………………….

2.3

Framework and Methodology of the AM Plan…………………………

Core Assets – Transportation…………………………………….

3.1

Asset Inventory……………………………………………………………

3.2

Profile and Age of Assets………………………………………………..

3.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems…………………………………

3.3.1

Road Pavement Condition………………………………………………

3.3.2

Structure Condition – Bridges and Culvers (>3m Span)……………..

3.3.3

Asset Condition Summary – Transportation…………………………..

3.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

3.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

3.5.1

Community Levels of Service……………………………………………

3.5.2

Technical Levels of Service……………………………………………..

3.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

3.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Core Assets – Drinking Water System………………………….

4.1

Asset Inventory……………………………………………………………

4.2

Profile and Age of Assets………………………………………………..

4.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems…………………………………

Asset Management Plan

Page 316 of 470 Page |6

Table of Contents (continued)

4.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

4.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

4.5.1

Community Levels of Service…………………………………………… 37

4.5.2

Technical Levels of Service…………………………………………….. 38

4.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

4.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Core Assets – Stormwater Management……………………….. 43 5.1

Asset Inventory…………………………………………………………… 43

5.2

Profile and Age of Assets……………………………………………….. 44

5.3

Asset Conditions and Rating Systems………………………………… 45

5.4

Data Sources……………………………………………………………..

5.5

Levels of Service…………………………………………………………

5.5.1

Community Levels of Service…………………………………………… 48

5.5.2

Technical Levels of Service…………………………………………….. 49

5.6

Lifecycle Strategies………………………………………………………

5.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs……………….

Asset Management Strategy……………………………………… 52 6.1

Asset Management Strategy……………………………………………

6.2

Risk Management………………………………………………………..

6.2.1

Probability of Failure……………………………………………………..

6.2.2

Consequence of Failure…………………………………………………

6.2.3

Risk Assessment Matrix…………………………………………………

Financing Strategy………………………………………………….. 56 7.1

Sources of Funding…….………………………………………………… 56

7.2

Short Term Funding Strategy….……………………………………….. 57

7.3

Long Term Financing Strategy……….………………………………… 59

7.4

A Living Document..……………………………………………………..

Conclusions and Recommendations…………………………… 61

Asset Management Plan

Page 317 of 470 Page |7

Asset Management Plan

Page 318 of 470 Page |8

Table Index Core Assets - Transportation Table 3.1

Core Transportation Asset Details and Valuation…………………..

Table 3.2

Average Core Transportation Asset Age…………………………….

Table 3.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 3.4

Five Point Condition Rating System – PCI…………………………..

Table 3.5

Five Point Condition Rating System – BCI…………………………..

Table 3.6

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 3.7

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Roads……………………………

Table 3.8

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Bridges………………………….

Table 3.9

Qualitative Description of Roadways……………………………………

Table 3.10

Qualitative Description of Bridges…………………………………….

Table 3.11

Technical LOS for Road – Lane-km………………………………….

Table 3.12

Technical LOS – Pavement Condition Index………………………….

Table 3.13

Table 3.14

Table 3.15

Maintenance and Monitoring – Roads and Bridges………………..

Table 3.16

Rehabilitation and Renewal - Roads and Bridges………………….

Table 3.17

Transportation Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs………………….

Core Assets Drinking Water Table 4.1

Core Drinking Water Asset Details and Valuation………………….

Table 4.2

Core Drinking Water Asset Age………………………………………

Table 4.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 4.4

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 4.5

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Water Assets……………………

Table 4.6

Qualitative Description of Water Assets……………………………..

Table 4.7

Technical LOS for Water System……………………………………..

Table 4.8

Maintenance and Monitoring – Water Distribution……………………

Asset Management Plan

Page 319 of 470 Page |9

Table Index (continued) Table 4.9

Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities…………………………….

Table 4.10

Rehabilitation and Renewal – Water Assets…………………………

Table 4.11

Water System Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs…………………..

Core Assets Stormwater Management Table 5.1

Stormwater Management Asset Details and Valuation…………….

Table 5.2

Core Stormwater Asset Age…………………………………………..

Table 5.3

Five Point Condition Rating System………………………………….

Table 5.4

Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis…………

Table 5.5

O Reg 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Stormwater Assets…………….

Table 5.6

Qualitative Description of Stormwater Assets……………………….

Table 5.7

Technical LOS for Stormwater System…………………………………

Table 5.8

Maintenance and Monitoring – Stormwater Management…………

Table 5.9

Rehabilitation and Renewal – Stormwater Management…………..

Table 5.10

Stormwater Asset Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs…………………

Asset Management Strategy Table 6.1

Probability of Failure Score………………………………………………

Table 6.2

Consequence of Failure Score………………………………………..

Table 6.3

Renewal Strategy Based on Risk…………………………………….

Asset Management Plan

Page 320 of 470 P a g e | 10

Figure Index Core Assets - Transportation Figure 3.1.1

Age Profile- Paved Roadways HCB Asphalt…….…………………..

Figure 3.1.2

Age Profile- Paved Roadways LCB Surface Treated ….…………..

Figure 3.2

Age Profile - Bridges Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)………………….

Figure 3.3

Age Profile - Culverts Span 3m or Greater (OSIM) .………………

Figure 3.4.1

Condition Ratings – Roads (HCB Asphalt)…………………………..

Figure 3.4.2

Figure 3.5

Condition Ratings – Roads (LCB Surface Treated)………………… Condition Ratings – Bridges (OSIM)…………………………………

Figure 3.6

Condition Ratings – Culverts (OSIM)………………………………..

Core Assets Drinking Water Figure 4.1

Age Profile – Drinking Water Distribution Assets………………….,

Figure 4.2

Age Profile – Treatment / Storage Assets…..………………………

Figure 4.3

Condition Ratings – Water Distribution…..………………………….

Figure 4.4

Condition Ratings – Treatment / Storage Assets ……………..……

Core Assets – Stormwater Management Figure 5.1

Age Profile- Stormwater Treatment Unit Assets..…………………..

Figure 5.2

Age Profile- Storm Collection Assets………………… ….…………..

Figure 5.3

Condition Ratings – Stormwater Treatment Units…………………..

Figure 5.4

Condition Ratings – Stormwater Collection Assets. .………………

Asset Management Strategy Figure 6.1

Risk Matrix……………………………………………………………….

Figure 6.2

Overall Core Asset Condition Ratings………..………………………

Figure 6.3

Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution….…..………………………….

Financing Strategy Figure 7.1

10 Year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs….………………….

Figure 7.1.1

Short Term Capital Expenditures (Water Assets) ……………….

Figure 7.2

100 Year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs……………………

Figure 7.1.2

Tax Supported Assets………………………………………………….

Asset Management Plan

Page 321 of 470 P a g e | 11

1.1

Purpose of the Plan

1.2

Alignment with Other Township Policies

Asset Management Plan

Page 322 of 470 P a g e | 12



O. Reg. 239/02 – Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways

1.3

Strategic Plan 2023 – 2026



Resilience and Adaptation – Our commitment is to foster community resilience to climate change through the safeguarding of our natural assets and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

Pillar 2 – Municipal Service Excellence 



Customer Focus – Our goal is to enhance customer service and community outreach, making it more accessible through clear communications, self-service, and staff support and resources.



Long-Term Planning – The Township is dedicated to developing and implementing long-term financial and master plans to ensure the sustainability of our programs and services.



Asset Management Plan

Page 323 of 470 P a g e | 13

Pillar 3 – People and Partnerships 

1.4

Changes in Growth in Population



Employment Growth Forecast   



Asset Management Plan

Page 324 of 470 P a g e | 14



The Inverary employment area also represents a marketable location to facilitate the bulk of industrial employment.

Residential Growth Forecast 



 

Asset Management Plan

Page 325 of 470 P a g e | 15

2.0 Asset Management Plan, Framework and Methodology 2.1

Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan

2.2

Stakeholders in the Updates of the AM Plan

Key stakeholders of the 2023 Plan update include:    

2.3

Framework and Methodology of the AM Plan

Asset Inventory
Profile and Age of Assets
Asset Conditions and Rating Systems
Data Sources
Levels of Service
Lifecycle Strategies
Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Page 326 of 470 P a g e | 16

3.1

Asset Inventory

Table 3.1 – Core Transportation Asset Details and Valuation Subservice Major Asset Group Roads Pavement (HCB)

Surface Treatment (LCB Structures

Process – Sub Asset Group Arterial (Class 2) Collector (Class 3 and 4) Local (Class 5 and 6) Collector (Class 3 and 4) Local (Class 5 and 6) Bridges Spanning 3m or

24 structures Culverts** Spanning 3m or

Asset Quantity (2022)

Unit

312,630 sqm

36.361

788,985 sqm

78.392

111,190 sqm

13.296

2,113,808 sqm

106.428

589,707 sqm

32.732

3,041 sqm

33.944

1,624 sqm

11.099

*HCB and LCB Assets include road base. Gravel roads are excluded. **Culvert assets do not include drainage structures with spans of less than 3m.

Asset Management Plan

Replacement Value (2022 $M)

Page 327 of 470 P a g e | 17

3.2

Profile and Age of Assets

Figure 3.1.1 – Age Profile – Paved Roadways HCB (Asphalt)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

44% $60,000,000 $50,000,000

34%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000

17%

$20,000,000 $10,000,000 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 3.1.2 – Age Profile – Paved Roadways LCB (Surface Treated)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

56% $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000

27%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000 10%

$20,000,000 $10,000,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Asset Management Plan

Page 328 of 470 P a g e | 18

Figure 3.2 – Age Profile – Bridges Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

40% $14.0 $12.0

26%

$10.0 $8.0 $6.0

13%

$4.0

7% 1%

$2.0

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 3.3 – Age Profile – Culverts Span 3m or Greater (OSIM)

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

26%

$3.0 23% $2.5 $2.0 12%

$1.5 9% $1.0

4% $0.5

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Page 329 of 470 P a g e | 19

Table 3.2 – Average Core Transportation Asset Age Major Asset Group

Sub Asset Group

Pavement (HCB)

Arterial (Class 2)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022) 23.7 21.3

Collector (Class 3 and 4)

17.3

32.7

Local (Class 5 and 6)

19.1

40.9

Surface Treatment (LCB)

Collector (Class 3 and 4)

14.7

10.3

Local (Class 5 and 6)

12.5

17.5

Structures

Bridges Spanning 3m or Greater Culverts Spanning 3m or Greater

35.1

39.9

35.5

14.5

3.3

Average Age (2022)

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

Table 3.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System Grade Description Condition Assessment Definition VG

Very Good

Well maintained, good condition, new or recently rehabilitated.

Good

Good condition, few elements exhibit existing deficiencies.

Fair

Asset Management Plan

Some elements exhibit significant deficiencies. Asset requires attention.

Age Based Condition

Probability of Failure

Greater than 80% of asset useful life remaining. 60 to 79.9% of asset useful life remaining. 40 to 59.9% of asset useful life remaining.

Improbable

Not Likely Possible

Page 330 of 470 P a g e | 20 P

Poor

Very Poor

20 to 39.9% of asset useful life remaining.

Likely

Less than 20% of asset useful service life remaining.

Very Probable

3.3.1

Road Pavement Condition

Asset Management Plan

Page 331 of 470 P a g e | 21

Table 3.4 – Five Point Condition Rating System – PCI PCI Rating

Description

85 to 100

Very Good

70 to < 85

Good

55 to < 70

Fair

40 to < 55

Poor

0 to < 40

Very Poor

Table 3.5 – Five Point Condition Rating System - BCI

Asset Management Plan

BCI Rating

Description

85 to 100

Very Good

70 to < 85

Good

60 to < 70

Fair

40 to < 60

Poor

0 to < 40

Very Poor

Page 332 of 470 P a g e | 22

3.3.3 Asset Condition Summary - Transportation The charts provided below illustrate the condition of each of the categories of transportation assets by asset value.  

Figure 3.4.1 – Condition Ratings – Roads (HCB Asphalt)

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

45% $60,000,000 $50,000,000

30%

$40,000,000 19% $30,000,000 $20,000,000 6%

Poor

Very Poor

$10,000,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 3.4.2 – Condition Ratings – Roads (LCB Surface Treated)

Replacement nValue (2021 $)

47% $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000

27%

$40,000,000 $30,000,000

10% 10%

$20,000,000

$10,000,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Overall Condition Rating Asset Management Plan

Very Poor

Page 333 of 470 P a g e | 23

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

Figure 3.5 – Condition Ratings - Bridges (OSIM)

55%

$20.0 $18.0 $16.0 $14.0 $12.0

23%

$10.0

17%

$8.0 $6.0 $4.0

$2.0 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Overall Condition Rating

Replacement nValue (2022 $, millions)

Figure 3.6 – Condition Ratings - Culverts (OSIM)

33%

$4.0 $3.5 21%

$3.0 $2.5

23%

16%

$2.0 7%

$1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Overall Condition Rating

3.4

Data Sources

Page 334 of 470 P a g e | 24

developments were not included within these inventories. A summary of the data sources is included in Table 3.6 below:

Table 3.6 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Replacement Value

Condition Estimate

Roads

GIS

Bridges – Span 3m or Greater

GIS / 2021 OSIM Report

Unit Construction Costs (per m of road/design standard) Engineering Estimates / Actual Costs

Based on PCI within Comprehensive Road Needs Study (2022) – Golder Associates Based on BCI within 2021 OSIM Report – D. M. Wills

Culverts – Span 3m or Greater

GIS / 2021 OSIM Report

Engineering Estimates / Actual Costs

Based on BCI within 2021 OSIM Report – D. M. Wills

3.5

Levels of Service

In order to meet the requirements of the regulation, this AM plan update will discuss current LOS under community and technical LOS categories, defined as: 

Community Levels of Service: Qualitative descriptions that demonstrate the Township’s customer and stakeholders’ expectations of transportation services.

Asset Management Plan

Page 335 of 470 P a g e | 25



Technical Levels of Service: Technical metrics that translate customer expectations into objectives and performance measures.

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Tables 3.7 and 3.8 which follow.

Table 3.7 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Roads Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the road network in the municipality and its level of connectivity.

Quality

Description or images that illustrate the different levels of road class pavement condition.

Table 3.8 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Bridges Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Description of the traffic that is supported by municipal bridges (e.g., heavy transport vehicles, motor vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists).

Percentage of bridges in the municipality with loading or dimensional restrictions

Quality

Description or images of the condition of bridges and how this would affect use of the bridges.

For bridges in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value.

Description or images of the condition of culverts and how this would affect use of the culverts.

3.5.1

For structural culverts in the municipality, the average bridge condition index value.

Community Levels of Service

Page 336 of 470 P a g e | 26

of the corresponding road ratings of Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. Qualitative descriptions of Community LOS for Pavements and Bridges can be found in Tables 3.9 and 3.10 below:

Table 3.9 – Qualitative Description of Roadways Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the road network in the municipality and its level of connectivity.

Quality

Description or images that illustrate the different levels of road class pavement condition.

Table 3.10 – Qualitative Description of Bridges Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

Description of the traffic that is supported by municipal bridges (e.g., heavy transport vehicles, motor vehicles, emergency vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists).

Asset Management Plan

Page 337 of 470 P a g e | 27

Quality

Description or images of the condition of bridges and how this would affect use of the bridges. Description or images of the condition of culverts and how this would affect use of the culverts.

The majority of bridges in the Township are currently in a good to very good condition whereas the majority of culvert structures in the Township are in a fair to good condition.

3.5.2 Technical Levels of Service Ontario Regulation 588/17 requires the municipality to track two key technical metrics for the road network that include:  

The overall proportion of each road classification area to the overall area of the municipality; and The average Pavement Condition Index for each classification of road.

Table 3.11 – Technical LOS for Road – Lane-km Road Classification

Lane-km (Hard Surfaced)

Arterial Roads (MMS Class 1 or 2)

76.58

Collector Roads (MMS Class 3 or 4)

916.22

Local Roads (MMS Class 5 or 6)

227.26

Asset Management Plan

Township of South Frontenac Land Area (km2)

948

Page 338 of 470 P a g e | 28

Table 3.12 – Technical LOS - Pavement Condition Index Road Classification

Arterial Roads

Collector Roads

Local Roads

Definition (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Current Qualitative Performance Paved Roads Only (PCI) HCB Asphalt = 70.5

HCB Asphalt = 75.6 LCB Surface Treated = 70.5

HCB Asphalt = 81.5 LCB Surface Treated = 69.3

The Township has included the details on Technical LOS for bridges and culverts in Tables 3.13 and 3.14 below.

Asset Management Plan

Page 339 of 470 P a g e | 29

Table 3.13 – Technical LOS for Bridges – Loading or Dimensional Restrictions Asset

Percentage (%)

Comments

Bridge (Width or Height)

12.5

3 of 24 total

Bridge Loading

8.3

2 of 24 total

Table 3.14 – Technical LOS – Bridge Condition Index Asset

Average BCI

Bridges (In Service)

63.5

Culverts (Span 3m or greater)

66.4

3.6

Lifecycle Strategies

Asset Management Plan

Page 340 of 470 P a g e | 30

Table 3.15 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Roads and Bridges Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Hard Surface Roads – Paved (HCB)

 Routine MMS Inspections  Crack sealing and mastic repairs  Hot patching and cold patching  Shoulder maintenance

 Use of asphalt binder rejuvinators

Hard Surface – Surface Treated (LCB)

 Routine MMS Inspections  Crack sealing and edge repairs  Hot patching and cold patching

 Use of cold in place sealants / slurry seals

Bridges and Culverts (OSIM)

 Increased frequency of concrete crack repairs  Vegetation removals

Table 3-16 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Roads and Bridges Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Hard Surface Roads – Paved (HCB)

 PCI 70 to 85 – Microsurfacing  PCI 60 to 70 – Mill and Pave or Straight Overlay  PCI 55 to 60 – Cold in Place recycling  PCI <55 – Full Reconstruction

Hard Surface – Surface Treated (LCB)

 PCI 60 to 80 – Single Surface Treatment - SST  PCI less than 55 – Full Reconstruction of DST

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential

Page 341 of 470 P a g e | 31 Bridges and Culverts (OSIM)

3.7

 Develop & implement committed annual trenchless lining programs  Develop & implement committed annual structure repair program

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for transportation assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $94.8 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 3.17 – Transportation Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$8,710,500

2024

$8,627,700

2025

$11,718,860

2026

$8,691,250

2027

$8,103,640

2028

$8,993,500

2029

$9,989,448

2030

$9,734,150

2031

$10,276,250

2032

$9,933,500

TOTAL

$94,778,798

Page 342 of 470 P a g e | 32

4.1

Asset Inventory

Table 4.1 – Core Drinking Water Asset Details and Valuation Subservice Major Asset Group Drinking Supply and Water Treatment System

Process – Sub Asset Group

4.2

Asset Quantity (2022)

Unit

Replacement Value (2022 $M)

0.375

4.911

1.440

1 1,321

ea m

1.646

5,491

3.162

342

43 83 288 229

ea ea ea ea

0.352 0.340 0.879 0.097

Profile and Age of Assets

Page 343 of 470 P a g e | 33

Figure 4.1 – Age Profile – Drinking Water Distribution Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

94% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000

6% 0%

$500,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 4.2 – Age Profile –Treatment / Storage Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

83% $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000

17% 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Asset Management Plan

Page 344 of 470 P a g e | 34

The average age and estimated life of water service assets weighted by replacement value is summarized below in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 – Core Drinking Water Asset Age Subservice Major Asset Group Drinking Water System

4.3

Process – Sub Asset Group

Supply and Raw Water Intake Treatment Treatment Plant Plant Upgrades (2010) Storage Elevated Water Tower (1,280 m3) Distribution Water Mains Hydrants Valves Services Meters

Useful Service Life (yrs)

Average Age (2022)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022)

100 50 25

17 17 12

83 33 13

100

90 60 50 50 25

16.7 16.4 16.6 16.6 3.3

73.3 43.6 33.4 33.4 21.7

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

Table 4.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System

Asset Management Plan

Remaining Useful Life (%)

Description

80 to 100

Very Good

60 to < 80

Good

40 to < 60

Fair

20 to < 40

Poor

0 to < 20

Very Poor

Page 345 of 470 P a g e | 35

Figure 4.3 – Condition Ratings – Water Distribution

Replacement nValue (2022$)

66% $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 34%

$2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000

Poor

Very Poor

0% $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 4.4 – Condition Ratings – Treatment / Storage Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

59% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000

24%

$2,500,000 17%

$2,000,000 $1,500,000

Poor

Very Poor

$1,000,000 $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating Asset Management Plan

Page 346 of 470 P a g e | 36

4.4

Data Sources

Table 4.4 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Raw Water Intake Treatment Plant / Plant Upgrades Elevated Water Storage Tower Water Mains

Excel Record Water Treatment Excel Record Water Treatment Excel Record Water Treatment GIS

Hydrants

GIS

Valves

GIS

Services

GIS

Meters

Excel Records Finance

4.5

Levels of Service

Asset Management Plan

Page 347 of 470 P a g e | 37

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Table 4.5 below.

Table 4.5 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Water Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are connected to the municipal water system.

Percentage of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that have fire flow.

Percentage of properties where fire flow is available.

Description of boil water advisories and service interruptions.

The number of connection-days per year where a boil advisory notice is in place compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Reliability

The number of connection-days per year due to water main breaks compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

4.5.1

Community Levels of Service

Table 4.6 – Qualitative Description of Water Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that are connected to the municipal water system.

Scope

Description which may include maps, of the user groups or areas of the municipality that have fire flow.

The water network map shown in Appendix B1 shows all of the locations of hydrants in the Village of Sydenham. All hydrants in the village carry a rating

Asset Management Plan

Page 348 of 470 P a g e | 38 of A (1000 – 1499 GPM) or AA (1500 GPM or greater) Reliability

Description of boil water advisories and service interruptions.

Reliability

Overall asset condition – Water Distribution assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

100%

Reliability

Overall asset condition – Water Treatment and Storage Assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

83%

4.5.2

Technical Levels of Service

Table 4.7 – Technical Levels of Service for Water System Service Attribute

Technical LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Measurement

Scope

Percentage of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Scope

Percentage of properties where fire flow is available.

All 288 properties currently serviced in the Sydenham Village are supplied with fire flow protection. Total percentage is 100% (288 of 288)

Reliability

The number of connection-days per year where a boil advisory notice is in place compared to the total number of properties connected to the municipal water system.

Asset Management Plan

There were no boil water advisories in either 2021 or 2022. 0 Connection-Days/Year (2022) 0 Connection-Days/Year (2021)

Page 349 of 470 P a g e | 39 Reliability

Efficiency

*Performance metrics are not required by O Reg 588/17)

4.6

Lifecycle Strategies

Table 4.8 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Water Distribution Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Water Mains

 Inspections and Flushing  Leak Detection (As Required)

Hydrants

 Inspected and Flushed Annually  Fire Flow Testing (5yr Cycle)

Line Valves

 Inspected and Exercised Annually

Services

 Inspections and maintenance as required

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential

 Cathodic Protection for early corrosion of copper services

Page 350 of 470 P a g e | 40 Meters

 Readings Bi-Monthly  Maintenance as required

Backflow Prevention

 Inspect and Maintain Devices at Tower and Treatment Plant by certified staff.  None

Bulk Water

 Convert all meters to Radio Read (2 remaining)

 New bulk water station at water tower site

Table 4.9 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities Facility System

Examples of Components

Operational Activities

Building Structural

Foundation, roofing, exterior walls, columns, beams staircases

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

Additional / Potential Activities  Establish regularly scheduled Building Condition Assessments

Buildings Architectural

Non-structural building components such as windows, doors, fixtures and floor coverings HVAC, plumbing, electrical, lighting, communications, security

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

 Establish regularly scheduled Building Condition Assessments

 Repairs prescribed and prioritized by condition assessments. Last assessment was 2019.

Process Structural

Water storage tanks

Process Electrical

Generators and electrical systems

 Explore energy retrofits  One high lift pump on VFD currently (2019)  Establish regularly scheduled Condition Assessments

Buildings Mechanical and Electrical

Asset Management Plan

Current

Page 351 of 470 P a g e | 41

Table 4.9 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Facilities (Continued) Facility System

Process Mechanical

Examples of Components Low lift pumps, high lift pumps, motors and valves

Process Piping

 Repairs are generally reactive  Replacement of pneumatic actuated valves (2022)

Instrumentation Flow meters, and Controls chlorine regulators, pressure transmitters

 Chlorine systems have preventative maintenance  Third party calibration programs on analysers and lab equipment  Regular PM work orders

Raw Water Intake

Pumps and seasonal zebra mussel control system

Filters

Ceramic Filter Media (Macrolite) / Granular Activated Carbon

Asset Management Plan

Additional / Potential Activities

 Replacement program needed for serpentine piping for chlorine contact time – ICIP Grant Program for 2024/2025

 Condition assessments at intake in Sydenham Lake

Page 352 of 470 P a g e | 42

Table 4.10 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Water Assets Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Watermains

 Spot repairs as required – usually in response to leaks  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

 Monitor new and emerging trenchless renewal technologies

Hydrants, Valves and Services

 Repairs as required – usually at stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Water Treatment

 Replacement at end of useful service life

Water Storage

 Repairs and coatings on tanks – outcomes of remote camera video (ROV) inspections  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Water Facilities (Buildings)

 Rehabilitation work as recommended through detailed building condition assessments.

4.7



Operational redundancies implemented with major renewals

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for water assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $1.6 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 4.11 – Water System Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$42,000

2028

$42,500

2024

$314,000

2029

$13,000

2025

$963,980

2030

$50,000

2026

$39,500

2031

$47,500

2027

$37,500

2032

$47,500

TOTAL

$1,597,480

Page 353 of 470 P a g e | 43

Core Assets – Stormwater Management

5.1

Asset Inventory

Table 5.1 – Stormwater Management Assets Details and Valuation Subservice

Major Asset Group

Stormwater Stormwater Management Treatment System Storm Sewers Structures (Concrete)

Culverts (<3m dia)

*Note Inventory in progress.

Asset Management Plan

Process – Sub Asset Group Manufactured Treatment Devices Up to 250mm

250 to 500mm 500 to 1050mm Catchbasin Catchbasin Manhole Double Catchbasin Double Catchbasin Manhole Ditch Inlet Manhole *Culverts

Asset Unit Quantity (2022) 4 ea

Replacement Value (2022 $M) 0.225

0.327 7.140 3.281 199 99 40 11

km km km ea ea ea ea

0.106 2.943 1.789 0.697 0.634 0.232 0.098

29 20 14

ea ea ea

0.157 0.124 3.191

Page 354 of 470 P a g e | 44

5.2

Profile and Age of Assets

Figure 5.1 – Age Profile – Stormwater Treatment Unit Assets 76%

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

$180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000

24%

$60,000 $40,000 $20,000

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction

Figure 5.2 – Age Profile –Storm Collection Assets Replacement nValue (2022 $)

37% $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000

19% 17%

$2,000,000

12%

$1,500,000 9%

$1,000,000 $500,000

4% 0%

$Pre 1950

1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s 2020’s

Decade of Construction Note: Age on culvert data insufficient for compiling with storm collection assets. Asset Management Plan

Page 355 of 470 P a g e | 45

Table 5.2 – Core Stormwater Asset Age Subservice

Major Asset Group

Process – Sub Asset Group

Useful Service Life (yrs)

Average Age (2022)

Estimated Remaining Service Life (2022)

Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater Management Treatment Treatment Units – System Oil Grit Separator

4.7

45.3

Stormwater Concrete, HDPE Collection and PVC Storm Pipe

22.9

57.1

Corrugated Steel Storm Pipe

33.4

16.6

Stormwater Structures (MH, CB, DI etc…)

26.4

53.6

5.3

Asset Conditions and Ratings Systems

Table 5.3 – Five Point Condition Rating System Remaining Useful Life (%)

Description

80 to 100

Very Good

60 to < 80

Good

40 to < 60

Fair

20 to < 40

Poor

0 to < 20

Very Poor

Page 356 of 470 P a g e | 46

Figure 5.3 – Condition Ratings – Stormwater Treatment Units

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

100% $250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

Poor

Very Poor

$Very Good

Good

Fair

Overall Condition Rating

Figure 5.4 – Condition Ratings – Stormwater Collection Assets

Replacement nValue (2022 $)

49% $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000

27%

$3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 10%

$1,500,000

$1,000,000 $500,000 $Very Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Overall Condition Rating

Asset Management Plan

Very Poor

Page 357 of 470 P a g e | 47

5.4

Data Sources

Table 5.4 – Data Sources for Inventory, Cost and Condition Analysis Asset

Inventory

Stormwater Treatment Units / Oil Grit Separators Storm Pipe

GIS

Unit Construction Costs ($/ m)

Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

Stormwater Structures (MH, CB and DI)

GIS

Unit Construction Costs ($/unit)

Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

5.5

Replacement Value Unit Construction Costs ($/ m)

Condition Estimate Based on Remaining Useful Service Life

Levels of Service

Ontario Regulation 588/17 currently sets out the core LOS requirements that all municipalities must discuss and report on in Table 5.5 below.

Asset Management Plan

Page 358 of 470 P a g e | 48

Table 5.5 – O. Reg. 588/17 Prescribed LOS for Stormwater Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Qualitative)

Technical LOS (Performance Metric)

Scope

Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm.

5.5.1

Percentage of the municipal stormwater management system resilient to a 5year storm.

Community Levels of Service

Table 5.6 – Qualitative Description of Stormwater Assets Service Attribute

Community LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Qualitative Description

Scope

Reliability

*Stormwater Treatment assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

100%

Reliability

*Stormwater Collection Assets with a rating of Good or Very Good.

59%

*Reliability metrics are not required by O Reg 588/17)

Asset Management Plan

Page 359 of 470 P a g e | 49

5.5.2

Technical Levels of Service

Table 5.7 – Technical Levels of Service for Stormwater System Service Attribute

Technical LOS (Required by O. Reg. 588/17)

Measurement

Scope

Percentage of properties in municipality resilient to a 100-year storm.

Scope

Percentage of the municipal stormwater management system resilient to a 5-year storm.

Asset Management Plan

Page 360 of 470 P a g e | 50

5.6

Lifecycle Strategies

Table 5.8 – Maintenance and Monitoring – Stormwater Management Asset Type

Operational Activities Current

Additional / Potential

Stormwater Treatment Units

 Inspections annually  Test, clean and remove sediments and hydrocarbons

Stormwater Mains

 Visual inspection at exposed ends during catchbasin cleaning

Catch basins

 Inspected and Cleaned Annually

Manholes

 Inspections and maintenance as required

 Spring and Fall inspections

Inlets / Outlets

 Inspections and maintenance as required

 Spring and Fall inspections

 Establish a committed annual CCTV program

Table 5.9 – Rehabilitation and Renewal – Stormwater Management Asset Type

Capital Renewal Activities Current

Stormwater Treatment Units

Asset Management Plan

 Spot repairs as required – usually at the stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

Additional / Potential

Page 361 of 470 P a g e | 51 Stormwater Mains and Structures

 Spot repairs as required – usually at stage of road renewals  Reconstruction at end of useful service life

 Develop & implement committed annual trenchless lining programs  Develop & implement committed annual structure repair program

Culverts

 Replacements on larger culverts (1-3) based on monitoring programs  Culverts renewed with road reconstruction activities

 Improve resources for data collection to support inventory and spatial records on cross culverts  Develop & implement committed annual culvert lining programs on major roadways

5.7

Current and Forecasted Operating and Capital Costs

The estimated costing for lifecycle activities and capital for stormwater assets are shown in the table below with an estimated $0.68 million over a period of 10 years.

Table 5.10 – Stormwater Asset Lifecycle Costs and Capital Costs

Asset Management Plan

Year

Capital Cost

2023

$274,350

2024

2025

$43,297

2026

$154,730

2027

2028

$216,360

2029

2030

2031

2032

TOTAL

$688,737

Page 362 of 470 P a g e | 52

6.0 Asset Management Strategy 6.1

Asset Management Strategy

6.2

Risk Management

Asset Management Plan

Page 363 of 470 P a g e | 53

Table 6.1 – Probability of Failure Score Estimated Condition

Probability of Failure Description

Probability of Failure Score

Very Good

Improbable

Good

Not Likely

Fair

Possible

Poor

Likely

Very Probable

Very Poor

6.2.2 Consequence of Failure The consequence of failure score for each asset was based on a review of information on the asset such as:     

Risk to public health and safety Duration of interruption of service Potential for environmental damage Value of the asset Council Priority

Table 6.2 shows the failure of consequence scorings and provides descriptions of each.

Table 6.2 – Consequence of Failure Score Probability of Failure Description

Consequence of Failure Score

Very low measurable impact of any kind.

Low/seldom/marginal impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Moderate/regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Major/regular impact on the function, serviceability, or capacity of the asset and (or) effect on public safety and the environment.

Catastrophic loss of infrastructure affecting public safety or having severe environmental consequences.

Asset Management Plan

Page 364 of 470 P a g e | 54

Figure 6.1 – Risk Matrix

Table 6.3 – Renewal Strategy based on Risk Risk Category

Risk Score

Replacement Term

Replacement Years

High

16 - 25

Short Term

Year 1 to 5

Medium

10 – 15

Medium Term

Year 6 to 10

Medium Medium – Low Low

7–9 4–6 1-3

Long Term – regular planned renewal based on condition, age of asset, expected useful life or when asset reaches a higher risk level (i.e., probability of consequence or failure increases)

Page 365 of 470 P a g e | 55

and storm sewer areas however there is a higher risk distribution of risk in the area of roads and bridges.

Figure 6.2 – Overall Core Asset Condition Ratings Asset Condition 45%

$160,000,000 Replacement Value

$140,000,000 $120,000,000

28%

$100,000,000 $80,000,000

16%

$60,000,000 $40,000,000

Poor

Critical

$20,000,000 $0 Excellent

Good

Fair Asset Condition

Figure 6.3 – Overall Core Asset Risk Distribution

Asset Management Plan

Page 366 of 470 P a g e | 56

7.1

Sources of Funding

There are many sources of funding, besides the annual tax levy, and these may include:     

Debt Reserves User Rates Canada Community Building Fund (“CCBF”) (formerly Federal Gas Tax) Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (“OCIF”)

Asset Management Plan

Page 367 of 470 P a g e | 57

7.2

Short Term Funding Strategy

Figure 7.1 – 10 year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs

Asset Management Plan

Page 368 of 470 P a g e | 58

Asset Management Plan

Capital Levy 165,949 166,298 166,626 166,931 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213 167,213

Ending Balance 1,414,107 616,425 779,552 906,983 1,036,696 1,161,409 1,315,621 1,432,834 1,552,547 1,672,260

Page 369 of 470

7.3

Opening Balance 7,842,164 6,877,688 6,671,381 3,751,687 4,190,293 5,835,468 6,861,863 7,620,483 9,171,805 10,745,301

Expenditures 8,984,850 8,627,700 11,762,157 8,845,980 8,103,640 9,209,860 9,989,448 9,734,150 10,276,250 9,933,500 95,467,535

Tax Levy (AIR) & in year taxation

Reserves & Funding

Ending Balance

3,652,016 3,834,617 4,026,348 4,227,665 4,439,048 4,661,000 4,894,050 5,138,753 5,395,691 5,665,476

4,368,358 4,586,776 4,816,115 5,056,921 5,309,767 5,575,255 5,854,018 6,146,719 6,454,055 6,776,758

6,877,688 6,671,381 3,751,687 4,190,293 5,835,468 6,861,863 7,620,483 9,171,805 10,745,301 13,254,035

Long Term Financing Strategy

Page 370 of 470 P a g e | 60

Figure 7.2 – 100 year Core Asset Capital Investment Needs

Based on this review, the existing core infrastructure needs are approximately $8.3 million per year (in constant 2022 dollars) to be sustained using this strategic approach.

7.4

A Living Document

60 | P a g e

Page 371 of 470 P a g e | 61

61 | P a g e

Page 372 of 470

To w n s h ip o f S o u th F ro n te n a c

Appendix A 1

Legend k

Y a r d s a n d B u ild in g s

P a rk s a n d R e c re a tio n

J "

B r id g e

? !

C u lv e rt - A ll F ire S ta tio n

pe or th Al

B y g ro v e

To p e l L n Ln

H ig

S eabroo ke

15 Rd

i ll

Cranberry Lake

CanalL

Cataraqui River (Rideau Canal)

Brewer Lake J " Ln

H e m lo c k H ill

Cataraqui River (Rideau Canal)

River Styx

A llin a L n

Rd C re e k

s ne Jo

e La

ar Jo e s Ln ry in g

D K R ID G E R

P o in t

Bear Creek

W h ite s

d kR rt C

re e

Ln n

re oo

Don M

k lo c ad De

n B ra d d e

ck L

le ja

Ap p a ir

ea id H

Ln n id L

an c le

Rd ea rs tte

R id

n C nso

G u th rie

Rd ng rli

Rd ke La

n yL lle Va x M

A le

f f ic

n co pi O

a rd ack

le tt P He w nn ma u ff Ka

fo ta f

B r in t ad y

ga ss sa as M a Ln

en re G

as L

lle y

r Va D ee

il ly

D u ff R d

Rd rth Pe d Ln

Pin e h a v e n L a n e

istm

C ook L

Chr e

Fry Ln

y L

B a c k Ba

e or Sh

od wo

d sR u nd

G ro

na Ko

Little Mud Lake

T ra v e rs

ew s ndr M ca

woo H a rd

Ln le

ws N a r ro

et m K is

e Rd

D e v il L a k

on ip t Sh

it e an Gr

T r o tt e r

F ire

A rth u r R d

C o rk e y R d

D eer C ree k D r

R e d M a p le L

n L a t im e r R d

? ? ! !

F ro n te n a c R d

D ix o n R d

e Le d

D rap er Lak e R

W ilm e r R d

s id

C li ff

F o u r S e as o n s D r

S ilv e rw o o d D r

ska

sa L ss n au g

Lee

D a le y R d

K in

Syde n ha m R d

p le

sL ld no

o rd

s Bay Rd S il l

G e o r g ia

S a lly L n

R e tre a t

M c c a llu m L n

le e

B la

Go d rd o Co n Ln le Ln

Bedf

L ake R

S ta g e C o a c h R d

e ak nL Fa

D ie r

C an oe

M u r v a le R d

S c a n la n C t

rre

ke oo br er Sh

r tr Pa

tt wi De en

G re

r li n g Spe

od wo ro w Ar

il le L onv M cc Rd

r Ba do Ln u

M ic a a y L n P o in t

G ul l B

Ln n

rL r b le

Ln c o ll

Ln se Ro

M in e L n

t er es D

Su g a r B u s h L n

e dg

S h o re s

se t

P in e

Sun

s D eyo

H in c h in b r o o

F lo rid a R d

Rd t or tp es W

d R

a ig Cr

ro o in b

H in

n S to rm s

ly L

Rd to n W il

B ra c k e n R d

E tta L n

Lake L n S Rd

H i ll

R d N o r th

Rd y re df Go te L n D o uc et

W a t s o n R d Q u a r ry R d M c le a n R d

w ro C

n sL nn

B u c k e rt L n

H ic

key

Rd St Rd E ve rg L n re e n

h o re st S We

on Mo d B u rn e tt R

K in g S t

rth

on R d N o e rs And

Rd sh

K e rr R d

L RD EL

oo ll y w

B ro w n s L n

Ln in e M ca Mi

E a g le L a k e

s Rd

o ld

mp Rd

ee u tl Co

n d L

Ln y rb De

F re e n e y L n nd co

M c garvey R d

L a k e f ie ld

L if

Rd P r in c e s s ! ?

i ld

n L Ln

o er

ts o

Sw a

La k e

n li ff L

R id

er L

is ig

W e s tv ie w L n n tL

w He

Dog Lake

J "

T r i lliu m

ll s

S ly

? !

rn R d

i tz

hb u W a s! ?

S o n n e v e ld R d

A nn

P o in t R d

c tb a

W e llin g t o n

y Rd

J S "

Cranesnest Lake

J "

Rd C ra n e s N e st

B u r n t H il

Creek

? !

! ? ?H a r r is !

Milburn Creek

u ry R d unb

? !

Horseshoe Lake

ts L n

V ie w

Traverse Lake

bR d

Rob

F a cto ry R d

y R

Guerley Lake

Little Bear Lake

Lower Loughborough Peterson Lake Creek Lake Upper Peterson Lake

d R" J Milburn u rn

A b e rn a th

Crow Lake

k Bay

Hart Lake

M il

lo c

Loughborough Lake Creek

L ak e

Ê"J Rd

Russell Lake

ou gh

in t R d

rr a

Pothole Lake

e at

dy L o d g e L n

n Sa

Mu r

Cedar Lake

ix o n R d

g ? !

M e lo

hbor

el Po

rr y

L a r ry Y o

B a rr

? !

Collins Lake

in tL n

Loug

B ay

S to

? R a nd y !

? !

Inverary Lake

! ?

o k ?P B uc !

I d a H ill R d

ern

ÊÊ!?M!?!?o r !?e la n d - D F a ir

e e tf

s n Ea

P ost

Pot Lake

n Rampar U b d e g ro ve L H ig h la n d L n

C la

u Ro

ake

D a rl in

y Fishing er nv Lake C o ? ! d yR C h a ffe

Round R d Lake

L nd

in is h

K e ir R d

R a m p a rts R d

Opinicon Lake

J "

e ll in

id e

Connells Lake

Lower Rock Lake

? !

N oW b le

n D n k li F ra n ge L

Lake

H ic

I ro n B r id

Round Lindsay Lake Lake Garter Lake Poole Lake Long

S le e t h L n ake L ow er R ou nd L

k La

Jo ne s

Spectacle Lake

Hamilton Lake

Upper Rock Lake

rd R d

d R! ?

ta ra B r it

it y

Stonehouse Lake

? !

d R" J

I s la n d R d

d n R

R ke d

Hinge Lake

H e w le tt P a c ka

? !

ld R d G re e n f ie

D a v id s o n R d

Ta g g a r t R d

c o tt

ill

now

nd R dS

iv e

S c o t t Is l a

l Ln

is u

d ! R ? ay iv r

? !

g ac

is h

o in

ke L n

Unk

Mississagua Creek

ia n

In d

av e

M accom

Davis Lake

? ! Goldfish Lake

ic O p in

n La

ir R

J "

Tw ilig h t R d

Rd Rd af Le

in g

tch

in L

T u r n b u ll L n

u n ta

8 th

s io

ye r

tL n

‘N

H o lm e s R d ? ! ? ?! ?! !

! ? ? !

P in

os Mo

B la

ta i l Mississagua Creek tt o n

Tw in

ake

Loughborough Lake

ta il C t

A R

? !

J "

W h ite

? !

Rd ? ! D ix o n

N o rm a n

Lacey Lake

? !! ?

R ic k a rd s R d

O ld B o y R d

Eddy Ln

R ID

h am

? !

Pond Hole Lake

d P e r th R

n Ln

Upper Awada Lake

H a llig a

A c c e s s Freeman Lake

W a ls h R d

T ib D a rl in g L n

? !

t an

Loon Lake

H illto p L n

B u re g a L n ? !

g R id

sL n

? !

T e tt

? R d n! L

? ! Lower Awada Lake D e a n S m ith R d

Sum ac R d ! ? ? A u g u s ta L n !

H id d e n V a lle y

? !

b e ll

N o rw a y

M o rr is o n R d

? R a ilto n R d ! ? !

a d de

S" h a le s R d J

Is la

? !

M cF

ll a

R u t le d g e R d

E le

J "

Spectacle Lake Indian Lake

? !

Big Clear Lake

Ln Buck Lake

J "" J

Crow Lake

Hoga

R it c h ie R d

Harves Lake

o tt

a rb

ir gb

n So Pe rr y

de n

pLn

m Ca

e dr

Lo o

? !

J "

La ke

C le

Slide Lake

Pond Lily Lake

K e e le y R d ? !

Big Salmon Lake

re w s

M c a nd l Ln

S h oa

ra Ln

ille

Brady Lake

D e v il s

n A lp in e L

Black Lake

Bear Lake Mud Lake

9 th

? !

Mink Lake Camel Little Rock Lake LakeLittle Black Lake Cedar Lake

Doe Lake

Christie Lake

tr en

? !

n Tu n d Gibson Lake

Little Clear Lake

nc Co th Rd 10 ke La e o lf d H an na R W

Rd ?il le ?u lv! M! ?!

B re se e R d C lif f

C a m e ro n L n

ls L

Little Salmon Lake

r te

o in

ae ich

Birch Lake

Hill Lake

H il l

FLO

F IS

PE RD

N OU

ant L

h Ln

? !

Deline t H un Lake Rush Darling Lake Lake Little Devil Lake Ln Glassy Lake o st te p Ga Mica Lake L ? it tl e ! Long La J " ke

S h e ila

South Otter Lake

nder

n R

? !

n e L

Arkon Lake

La v e

rto

? !

Rock Little Lake Wolfe Lake Gailhowie Pond

le m

J "

n Rd

! ? F o re s t R d ! ?

? ! Rd

H a u g h to

ro v

B usc

Glenvale Creek

! ? ? !

o lla rd

P in P eC t

? !

Paddys Lake Ar bu ck

Ln out

J "

! ? ? ! ? ! J "

? !

S c a n la n R d

L a m! ?b e rt R d

Arab Lake

o od

Z im S to n e rid g e L n

le y S t

ll be

t a in

To b in R d

r s

B ig B e n

J " k k Ê J " J ? ! ! ? " ? k !

W h eat

? !

ge Rd

G a r te

! ?

Judy Pond

R o se d a le R d

ils

st A lt o n R d E a! ?

Wolfe Lake

? !

ks L

F re e m a n R d

? !

B e lk n a

B u r r id

Lak

V ic k is L

B oo

Am ey Rd

G o rr R d ? Millhaven ! Creek

G a rre tt

s te

ry R d

ast

ls g

? !

B u lls e y e Ln Bulls Eye ? d ! y R Lake ld ? ! Knowlton Lake Eel Ba o u Blakes Lake A ir e d a l e L G n V a n lu v e n Rosedale Lake

n oo

Q u in n R d E

ic e

North Otter Lake

Silvers Lake

a Ia w

Butterill Lake

Fermoy Lake

onw

M c n e il

Eel Lake P h e a s

Blue Gould Lake Lake

McGuinns Lake

Folsom Lake

M a s on Ln

J "

C o tt

Tetsmine Moulton Lake n dL Lake Hemlock Lake oo Clearwater Lynch Lake gw Bear Do Lake Lake

A b ra m

n sL ll e r Se Green Lake

Yankee Lake

Miner Lake

Mitchell Creek

J "

Rothwell Lake

O R ile y R d R e dm o n d R d ! ?

ll L

atr

k La

lt z e rL n

Lynn ? Lake !

Be Sme

ay L n

L o u g h b o r o u g h P o rtla n d B o u n d a

? !

v ie

C H IP M U N

1 :1 8 0 ,0 0 0

?H e n d e r s o n R d !

r t in

a Jo hn M

A lt o n R d W e s t

g La

e st

Sigsworth ? ! Lake M in k T ra p L n Holleford Lake

J a m ie s o n R d

? !! ?

Rd W Q u in n! ?! ?

r A

?B r ig g ! ! ?

? !

? ! me

S h a rp le y

ke Ln

O ld

J "

S le

J "

T im

Canoe Lake

Desert Lake

w a rt

C la rk R d

! ? ? !

n rL

F e l lo

an ?! ! ? H il l R d F re d s te r L n

S te

K R

? !

OO W

I L SE

? !

Ya rke r R d

? ! ? Rd B r a d fo r d R d E a s t ! d C e n te n n ia l P a rk R

W a lla c e R d

W h ite

EBR ST

T r o u s d a le

s ro L m e Pe J a Co

ith

COL

E FR

A EM

s ek

Babcock Lake Pero Lake

? !

p Rd

r t la

k H o lle f o r d Bo yc e R d ? ! k

J "" J

k Rd C o le b r o o! ?

C o u lte

rLa

Garter Lake

n ke L

on W ils n

re d

st B r a d fo r d R d W e! ?

? !

Pond Lily Lake

P o li L n

g s te

S an

und

Potspoon Lake

n poo

J "

den

d P e t w o r t h R! ?

R iv e r R d

Cam

? !

o ft L n

ts Po

w it

p g ro

Long Pond Lake

F itz g e ra ld

r Byc

Ln Ln id e H il ls Thirty G o ld Island Lake R

M Ln J ro o k s "

Hambly Lake

E lle rb e c k R d

? !

W o lf e S w a m

A QU

J "

Pondlily Lake

W h it ty R d N o rt h

e Ln

n ry Rd

D eer Fourteen P a r k H u ff m a n L n Island Lake

W illy ’s ? Spring Lake !

Verona Lake

M a p le D

To m W at s o n R d

Long

? !

Napanee River Napanee Lake

D RD P R C A IL S A

F HU

Yo rk

Napanee River

J "

g un

ic cn

J "

d St ? !

? ! ! ? E a s t! ?

New

l in

n 2 L L ake 3 n n rre r sto L n Fa th e a e n F 41 L

F ir e h a ll R d

Jeffs Lake

Thirteen Island Lake

Bass Lake

McGuire Lake M ille r R d Howes Lake

Ve ro n a S a n d

B unk

B e llr o c k M ill S t B e llr o c k P e p p e r S t G o o d r ich S t J " Depot Creek ! ?

T OR

on Ln

? !

ore

B ay R

J "

? !

k Ê k

? !

" J Ln

o ry

Ban k

J "

F oo t

r R d

Vanluven Lake

le a

F o rty

S n id e

M em

urs

? !

ck R

ake ite L

B e a tt ie

J B e ll r " o

Black Lake A la m First Depot o L n Lake

M e eks R d

C a rr ig g L n

erh

J C la i r " De

eq u

LE N

L ev

la n

V IL CO

L LY

? !

Tre

f e llo w

n Rd

KE N IN

A re n a B d ry R

? !

Go od V ila lta

O a k F la ts

Depot Creek

g le

! ? J G le "

H a m ilt

W ilk in s o

Rd ke

G ile s

W a lk e r R d

C lo w R d

e or

S tru th e rs

B re e n L n

r r id

E ga n

er Ln

? !

Bu ck

R oa d 3

re And

im s L

L n D" Je m

n ? g L!

C am

oov

Bobs Lake

n e r li

a re s

o re

a l lH

Bay Sh

Bay

Doran Lake

B es se y Ln

e ic k

ise

bow

R a in

w Ln

Thompson Pond

Yor

J "

illi p

J "

Fish Creek

C re e k R d

Ln rn s Bu s L n rn Ka

P o in t L n Ln

lly

Ln Fish Creek R id e rs

W est

Bobs Lake

re s C

B u rn s

O ak Sho

k Ln

Lake R d

? !

e r C ro w L n C h a d w ic

sh R o b in

J "

F re a m S t

ll L

H ip

na h

h o re Ln

F is

Low

H an

th S

B ra d sh a w

u So

oo d

ft w

it L

Bobs Lake

B e r trim

S t in s o

S te e le

D ri

B ur n s L n N o rth

B o bs

Ne ado w R

?l la r d L n !

o n to R d

? !

ie r

e on

n rs A lf P a tt e

ff s

? !

p Oc

P o in t

go O pe on

Crow Lake

O a k Blu

C roz

Cam

p Rd k le

H anse n L

B a do ur

W em V in

Bobs Lake Ln

arm

B ra sh

er Rd

Bend

a ti

rke

T ry o

W a te r b o d y

e R Lak

C ro ss

To w n s h ip B o u n d a ry

D w y er R

tLn

P r o v in c ia l P a r k

rk s

R o a d N e tw o rk

Spa

e ll L

e v ie ro k L a k e

W a s te S ite

O M

A tt

li n

M u n ic ip a l O ffic e

" ñ

K ilo m e te rs 16

Page 373 of 470

Figure A-2.1 – Very Good (85 to 100 PCI) – Sunbury Road – Factory Road to Battersea Road

1|Page

Page 374 of 470

Figure A-2.2 – Good (70 to < 85 PCI) – Bellrock Road –0.8km West of Mill Street to Long Swamp Road

2|Page

Page 375 of 470

Figure A-2.3 – Fair (55 to < 70 PCI) - Rutledge Road – 2.2km East of Sydenham Road to Perth Road

3|Page

Page 376 of 470

Figure A-2.4 – Poor (40 to < 55 PCI) - Bellrock Road – Cross Road to Road 38 (Prior to Reconstruction)

4|Page

Page 377 of 470

Figure A-2.5 – Very Poor (0 to < 40 PCI) – Bedford Road – 1km North of Salmon Lake Road to Desert Lake Road

5|Page

Page 378 of 470

Figure A-3.1 – Example of Good Condition Bridge – Loughborough Lake Bridge - 1.0km South of Rutledge Road (BCI 74.6)

1|Page

Page 379 of 470

Figure A-3.2 – Example of Fair Condition Bridge – Rutledge Road Bridge – 0.03km West of George Street (BCI 65.0)

Figure A-3.3 – Example of Poor Condition Bridge – Eagle Creek Bridge – 2.2km North of Buck Bay Road (BCI 38.5)

2|Page

Page 380 of 470

Figure A-3.4 – Example of Good Condition Culvert – Massassauga Road Culvert – 5.1km East of Perth Road (BCI 92.1)

Figure A-3.5 – Example of Fair Condition Culvert – Colebrooke Road Culvert – 0.9km West of Road 38 (BCI 63.8)

3|Page

Page 381 of 470

Figure A-3.6 – Example of Poor Condition Culvert – Little Long Lake Road 3.2km North of Freeman Road (BCI 41.3)

4|Page

Appendix B1

Ki lom eters 5

Sydenham Water Treatment Plant and Pump System

20 0

25 0

20 0

15 0

20 0

25 0

20 0

25 0

20 0

25 0

Sydenham Water Tower

Distribution System Map Sydenham Water System

Legend . ! G

Hyd ra nt ( 43 )

. &

Va lve (4 1) Wa terma in

Syde nha m Bou nd ary 0

Uti li ti es Eng i neeri ng -GI S 1: 7, 500 100

200

300

Uti li ti es Ki ng ston -85Lap pan ’ s Lan e,Ki n g sto n,ON PO Box 790 K7L4X7 -Uti li ti es_GI S @ u ti li ti eski ng ston . com -6135461181

m 400

Produ c er:jdonald Revi si on:1 Revi ewer:J .Ru ni on s Uni ts:Meters Created:20200109 CRS :NAD 1983UTM Zon e18N Modi fi ed:20220907

Page 382 of 470

m xd on \S yden h am Water S ystem _2022. cati o ns_S yden h am Water S ystem Map Ap pli eRu n i u li 2022\Water\J ECTS
02_PROJ S
_GI \I N:

25 0

20 0

15 0

Sydenham Water Intake

! 5

6 " 6 "

LATIMER ROAD

! 5

Appendix C1

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PER TH ROA D

VILLAGE OF INVERARY TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

! 5! 5

6 "

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

S "

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

E ! 5! 5

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

FAIR GRO U ND

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

W X

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

S RO

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

! 5 ! 5

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

DIVISION STRE ET

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

DRAWING #:

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-01

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

L AK

EE W

ERN L

E EAST AN

D UN RO

AD RO

ROAD GRE ENFIELD

! 5 ! 5

DUFF ROAD

Loughborough Lake

ARTHUR ROAD

Inverary

AND STONE CO

HOLMES ROAD

UR T

Collins Creek Watershed

Collins Lake DAVIDSON ROAD

OR EL A

-D

E IX ON

RO AD

" / " /

Page 383 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM01_StormSewerSystem_Inverary.mxd

LMES ROAD

LATIMER ROAD

Inverary Lake

PERTH ROAD

Cataraqui River Watershed

PER TH R OAD

E E W !5!? X

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

PERTH ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

! 5

Culvert

Road Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

" 6

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

X W W !5 !5 X

R ?! ! 5!

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-02

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

WIL M E

W IL M ER

PERTH ROAD CRESCENT

Cataraqui River Watershed

ROAD

Lower Awada Lake

" 6

Perth Road

FI R EA C

Millhaven Creek Watershed

CESS

Freeman Lake

! 5

W X Page 384 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM02_StormSewerSystem_PerthRd.mxd

R RO AD

LELAND ROAD

Y R O AD NORWA

! 5

PERT

Indian Lake

L AN E

W X

HR OA D

Spectacle Lake

IL L

! 5

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

! 5

ESCENT PERTH ROAD CR

251 - 500 Pipe

! 5

<250 Pipe

SPR IN

! 5

Assessment Parcel

! 5

W X

7 Outlet

5 10

! 5

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

7 Inlet

Storm Structure by Type

! 5

" /

W ! X R

Drainage Direction

Legend

" /

Culvert

SHAL ES ROAD

Legend

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Railway

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

" 6

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

E 7

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" 6

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority.

" 6

6 7"

" 6 " 6

751 1050 Pipe

251 - 500 Pipe

AD O R N OP INICO

SWM-03

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Buck Lake

ALL EY ROAD HID DEN V

OPI NI CO

RT H

RO AD

RR OA D

Cataraqui River Watershed

Raymonds Corners

D N R OA

H T R E P

OA FR

AD RO

Spectacle Lake

Indian Lake

Perth Road

LEL

A ND ROAD

Lower Awada Lake

Page 385 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM03_StormSewerSystem_Raymonds.mxd

Draper Lake

OT TR

E MAP L

LES ROAD SHA

Little Franklin Lake

Mud Lake

A LE

L DORIS SMITH

AN E

7" S

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

" S

BATTERSEA ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

EA S ER T T

A 7" B S

Storm Structure by Type

Provincially Significant Wetlands

! R Maintenance Hole

Wetland

" 6

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Inlet

Rivers

D A RO

" S

Water Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

W EL L I NGS LA NE

Assessment Parcel

Hamlet

" 6 " 6

Township Boundary

NOBLE LANE

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6 " 6

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe 501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

KELLAR ROAD

" 6 " 6

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0 5 10

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-04.1

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Loughborough Lake

ON GT LIN W EL

Battersea Cataraqui River Watershed

Cedar Lake

EE SB

Dog Lake

LA N

AD RO

A LA NE

N UR

H AT

D OA

Page 386 of 470

W HIA

M OR

D SAN

STREET

SWM-04.2

HID EAW AY

Collins Creek Watershed

ROAD

A ROUND L

Milburn Creek

SWM-04.1

K LARRY YOR

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM04.1_StormSewerSystem_Battersea.mxd

NOB

WELL INGS LAN

LE LAN E

AD RO

DORIS SM

" S " S

NE LA

RA MPARTS ROAD

X LE A

N EA CL

RSEA RO AD TT E BA

H A R A S

W X

T E E R ST

E STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

! 5

" 6

BATTERSEA ROAD VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Milburn Creek

! 5

! 5 ! 5

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

" 6

W X

" 6

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

" 6

! 5

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

WELLINGTON STREET

" S " 6

! 5

" 6

! 5

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

! 5

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

BAT TE

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

RSE A

M L IL E RE ST

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 5

DRAWING #:

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-04.2

Milburn Creek

" 6

! 5

7 Outlet

" 6

REET

" /

D ST

Drainage Direction

UN ITE

Legend

BAT TERSEA CROSS ST REET

" 6

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

" 6 " 6

Loughborough Lake

E ON GT LIN W EL

STREET

SWM-04.2

Battersea

SWM-04.1

Milburn Creek

EE SB

M OR

Dog Lake

LA N E

D OA MI

N UR

AD RO

D A O AR E S R E BAT T A LA NE

H AT

D SAN

Page 387 of 470

W HIA

Collins Creek Watershed

AD RO

Cedar Lake

HID EAW AY

A ROUND L

W"S X

Cataraqui River Watershed

NOB

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM04.2_StormSewerSystem_Battersea.mxd

WELL INGS LAN

LE LAN E

DORIS SM

NE LA

RA MPARTS ROAD

X LE A

N EA CL

RSEA RO AD TT E BA

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

W X

Road

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

W X

Ditch Inlet

Oil Grit Separator

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

" 6

Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

" 6

7 Outlet

BOYCE ROAD

" 6

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

" 6

! R

751 1050 Pipe

" 6

ROAD 38

251 - 500 Pipe

" 6

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

W X

W X E

. ! G

D HOLLEFORD ROA

7 " 6 #

Wetland

X W W X

" 6

" S

Double Catch Basin

" 6

Provincially Significant Wetlands

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! 5

Township Boundary

E 7

" 6

Catch Basin

Rivers

Storm Structure by Type

" 6

" 6 *Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-05

E " 6

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

" 6

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

Hartington

E E

ROAD 38

Wilton Creek Little Creek Watershed

E E Page 388 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM05_StormSewerSystem_Hartington.mxd

BOYCE ROAD

HOLLEFORD ROAD

FIRST LAKE ROAD

E " 6

L BE

BELLROCK VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

W !? “SG!. X

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

" /

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

PERCY STREET

" 6

MAIN STREET

Culvert

STRUCTURE ID: 90007

AD RO

" /

" 6 " 6 " 6! R " 6

K OC LR

Legend Drainage Direction

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

BELLROCK MILL STREET

" 6 " 6

Depot Creek

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm) <250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe

! 5

GOODRICH STREET

" /

501 - 750 Pipe

" 6

751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

Meters UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-06

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

! R

BELLROCK PEPPER STREET " 6 ! 5

LEV EQUE ROAD

RO CK RO AD

RO A

BEL L

Camden Lake Napanee River Watershed

FIR

Bellrock

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

STRUCTURE ID: 90000

" S

" S . ! G

Page 389 of 470

LON G SWAM P ROAD

Camden Lake Napanee River Watershed

MAIN STREET

Depot Creek Watershed

PERCY STREET

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM06_StormSewerSystem_Bellrock.mxd

Depot Creek

E STREET AM ED TR NO

Appendix C1 ROAD 38

W XX W

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

6 "

HARROWSMITH VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

6 R " 6! "

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

6 6” "

6 6 " " 6

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

S "

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Inlet

Outlet

6 " STREET 6 MARIA "

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

6 " " 6

7 6 "

Assessment Parcel

6 "

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

OAD R H M IT S W RO R A H

T REE

Catch Basin

WIL LIAM ST

6 "

! R

6 " 7

6 " 6 " " 6 6 "

<250 Pipe

251 - 500 Pipe

" /

! 5

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 0 5 10

30 40

50 60

Meters

REV:

SWM-07

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

6 "

ROAD COLEBROOK

6 ! 5"

ALTON ROAD W

E ROAD 38

D RO A ON W ILT

S "

! ?

X"S W 6 " 6 "

6 "

RO AD

W AY

7 ST

E ET

ILT ON

" /

! R

6 "

7" 6 Millhaven Creek Watershed

Page 390 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM07_StormSewerSystem_Harrowsmith.mxd

PE TERS ROAD

WSMIT H R OAD HARRO

Wilton Creek Little Creek Watershed

AD COLEBROOK RO

7" 6

REET

Harrowsmith

7 #

7 7

RA IL

E DAME N OTR

" /

S "

6 "

GRAHAM ROAD

S "

6 "

OTTAWA STREET

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRAWING #:

6 6 " "

KINGSTON ROAD

6 " 6 "

6 6 " ! 5"

ROAD Y R U B SUN

5 5 !

! 5

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM SUNBURY VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Legend Drainage Direction

" /

Culvert

Road

Storm Structure by Type

Rivers

! R Maintenance Hole

Hamlet

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Provincially Significant Wetlands

" S

Double Catch Basin

Wetland

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

Water

. ! G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

BATTERSEA ROAD

" 6

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" S ! ?# 7

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

<250 Pipe

. ! G 6 ! 5 " / "

251 - 500 Pipe

STRUCTURE ID: 91610

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-08

" ? S !

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

C RA NDY

L AR K R O

ROAD MORELAND - DIXON

" 6

6 " S "

AND STONE CO

D RY ROA SUN BU

Collins Creek Watershed

Sunbury

RELAN D - DIXON ROAD

Collins Lake

IDA HILL ROAD

Cataraqui River Watershed

U WASHB

RN ROA

Bear Creek

PRINCESS ROAD

6 " 6 "

6 " 6 " Page 391 of 470

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM08_StormSewerSystem_Sunbury.mxd

UR T

BA TT

ER SE A

RO AD

Inverary Lake

" S

" 6

Sydenham Lake

ST RE E

! 5" 6

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

SYDENHAM VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Protection Zone

IPZ Type 1

! 5

IPZ Type 2 IPZ Type 3

! 5

Township Boundary

Wetlands Wetland

6" " 6

Rivers

<250 Pipe

501 - 750 Pipe

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

751 1050 Pipe

Assessment Parcel

UR CH

ST RE

6 " " S 6 ! 5 "

Meters

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

6 "

! 5

SWM-09.1

! 5

RD ROA D

6 "

! 5

! 5 ! R

6 "

6 6" "

S ! 5"

6 ! 5"

GE F OX RID

6" " 6 6 " 6R " " 6 6 ! " 6 "

Sydenham Lake

6 " S "

6 "

6 " 6 "

6 "

Y LANE IV

DR IV

Page 392 of 470

WOODS DRIVE RY NT

OR GA N

U CO

Cataraqui River Watershed

CAM PBELL ROAD

STAGE COACH ROAD

Sydenham

! R

! 5

! 5 6 " ! 5

6" 6 "

RETREA T

SWM-09.1

! 5

6 "

SLUMBER LANE

RUTLEDGE ROAD

BRI D

POINT RO AD

" S X W

" 6

L AI

TH LANE

L RT PO

D AN

UE EN V A

N LANE

! 5

6" " 6

WAY

LA N E

D BE

RU N

OAD RR W A L KE IVE ASHWOOD DR

6 "

! 5# 7

" S

SWM-09.2

Millhaven Creek Watershed

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.1_StormSewerSystem_Sydenham.mxd

6 ! 5"

6 "

RUTLEDGE ROAD

ALTON ROAD E

EN HA M

6 6" "

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

SY D

6 "

5 6! " " S " S

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

6 " 6 "

DRAWING #:

6 "

W"6X X W WX

Water

251 - 500 Pipe

6 ! 5"

AMELIA STREET

DE N H Provincially Significant Road

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 "

Hamlet

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

" S

MCCALLUM LANE

" S

6 ! 5"

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

W X

SHALLOW LANE

Catch Basin

6" " 6

6 "

6 6" "

H NSTO

! R Maintenance Hole

6 "

Storm Structure by Type

6 "

E U Water Pump Station EN V A Water Intake D ! h RT LA N O P Surface Water Intake

AD " O 6 R T N POI

Culvert

6" " 5 6 !

/ "

Drainage Direction

R 6! 6" "

! 5! 5

NE A L BS B HO

Legend

GE OR GE

/ "

6# " 7

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

SYDENHAM VILLAGE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

6# " 7

Legend Drainage Direction

/ "

Culvert

6# " 7

Surface Water Intake Protection Zone

Storm Structure by Type

IPZ Type 1

! R

Maintenance Hole

6 "

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

W “6# X 7

IPZ Type 2 IPZ Type 3 Hamlet

Township Boundary Provincially Significant Wetlands

6 " 6 "

Wetland Water

! 5 W X

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)*

7 Inlet

7 Outlet

! 5

Assessment Parcel

Storm Sewer by Size <250 Pipe

Road

251 - 500 Pipe

Rivers

! 5

6 "

! 5

501 - 750 Pipe

6 "

751 1050 Pipe

! 5

! W X 5

6 "

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

SWM-09.2

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

! 5 X W 6 " 6 " 6 "

! 5 ! 5

! R R ! 5!

L RT PO

RUTLEDGE ROAD

POINT RO AD

SWM-09.1

Sydenham

CAM PBELL ROAD

BRI D

RETREA T

6 " ! R” 6

! . G

6 "

6 " ! R" 6

STRUCTURE ID: 91002

Sydenham Lake

! 5" 6

Y LANE IV

! ?" S

STAGE COACH ROAD

ASHWOOD DR

OAD RR W A L KE IVE

D AN

UE EN V A

6 "

! ?

Sydenham Lake

U CO

Cataraqui River Watershed

! 5" 6

Page 393 of 470

WOODS DRIVE RY NT

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.2_StormSewerSystem_Sydenham.mxd

L AI

SLUMBER LANE

EN HA M

TH LANE

SY D

GE F OX RID

LA N E

SWM-09.2

Millhaven Creek Watershed

WAY

D BE

RU N

RD ROA D

ALTON ROAD E

Fourteen Island Lake

Doe Lake

Holleford Lake

Pearkes Lake

E AN

‘S L

Pond Lily Lake

W IL

Spring Lake

SURFACE WATER INTAKE Verona PROTECTION ZONES Babcock Lake Hardwood Creek SYDENHAM VILLAGE Harrow Lake TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Pero Lake

IPZ Type 2

R OAD

ER O

O RI N

Bulls Eye Lake

Eel Bay

Rosedale Lake

ALTON ROAD W

RAILTON ROAD

Railton

GE OR GE ST RE ET

W IL M

MCCA LLUM LANE

N LANE

JOH NSTO

MO RGA ND RI V E

RUTLEDG E ROA D

AD RO

T RU

Spaffordton

KEELEY ROAD LATIMER ROAD

Inverary

AMEY ROAD

M CA

E PB

AD O LR

LAMBERT ROAD

NE ' O

ROAD

Ca tar aqui Riv er Wa ter shed

SYDENHAM ROAD

ILT ON

Sydenham

ROAD

SWM-09.1

Sydenham

NE A L

Spaffordton

RUTLEDGE ROAD

Loughborough Lake

KEEL EY R O

ELD GR EEN F I

ROAD

Inverary

Page 394 of 470

ROAD COLEBROOK

RO AD

Harrowsmith

Sydenham D POINT ROA

UE VEN DA PORTLAN

HARROWSMITH ROAD

SWM-09.2 Millha ven Cr eek Wa ter shed

TH R NO

E L AN

SHALLOWLANE

K ROAD COLEBROO ALTON ROAD W

NE BSLA HOB

JAMIESON ROAD

PET WORTH ROAD

WIL TO NR OA D

Wilmer

AMELIA STREET

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM09.3_IPZ_Sydenham.mxd

SWM-09.3 Harrowsmith

Hartington

ROA D

BOYCE ROAD

Perth Road

LA N E

L ELA N D

HOLLEFORD ROAD

Sydenham Lake

ALTON ROAD E

AD RO AL ES

OAD NORWAY R

L A NE

Verona

WALSH ROAD

RO A

ANKER

HO G AN

AD O R

PER TH

BED F OR D

RO AD

CH A LE

GEORGIA

PETWORTH ROAD

ROSEDALE ROAD

JAMIESON ROAD

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

S BAY ROAD

FREEMAN ROAD

NE A L

Lacey Lake

Hogan Lake

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

SIL L

REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-09.3

SYDENHAM ROAD

Meters

DRAWING #:

RETREAT

1,000

Upper Awada Lake

ROAD

500

Wilmer

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

R R E IE RO H M IL ITC W R

PERT H

Wilton Creek

Freeman Lake

Hartington

Harves Lake

E B ENJAMI NL AN

BOYCE ROAD

VANLUVEN ROAD

GOU LD L A K

L AKE ROA D

W NE

E L AN

ON G

Lower Awada Lake

ROAD Y A W R NO

OAD R N E

MCF D D E A

L SEY

LIT TLE L

Mica Lake

GRE

Rivers

EVER

D HOLLEFORD ROA

TROUSDALE ROAD

Little Long Lake

LANE ET T

RO Road

Doubloon Lake

AR L

Silvers Lake

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

Perth Road

Knowlton Lake

ROA

Water

Cronk Lake

McGuinns Lake

Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

LEL A ND RO A

Indian Lake

Little Devil Lake

Township Boundary

RO D A

Spectacle Lake

Darling Lake

L AN

ROA D

NI I P O

Glassy Lake

ROOKE R B N OA HI NCH I D

IPZ Type 3

Rush Lake

REDMOND ROAD

R M OO

IPZ Type 1

Blue Lake

NVI

BEDFO

LANE M R Surface Water Intake Protection Zone

Gould Lake

Draper Lake

LLE

Legend

A SH

Deline Lake

Hambly Lake

Hill Lake

D A MAR TIN RO HN

Little Franklin Lake

Mud Lake

CO N

Little Mud Lake Verona Lake

Buck Lake

Bear Lake

South Otter Lake

Verona

STO RM S LANE

Vanluven Lake

Tims Lake

Vanluven Lake

ST R

EET

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM KILDEER DRIVE

VILLAGE OF VERONA TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Vanluven Lake

Road Hamlet

! R Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Provincially Significant Wetlands

6 6" " 6! " 5 " 6

Wetland Water Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

7 Inlet

! 5" 6

7 Outlet

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 " 6 "

BANK ST REET

<250 Pipe

V ER ONA

501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

STREET

! 5" 6

! 5! 5" 6 SWM-10.1

! 5

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

6! " 5" 6

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

38 NE

S LA

Vanluven Lake

AD RO

ROA D

TL SER DE

ST O

SWM-10.1

Verona Lake RO CK

Little Mud Lake

SWM-10.2

ANE ‘S L

LA NE

B LY

HA M

AN E

T BI N ES

HI N

Hambly Lake

M LA E FAR

O RE MO

BELL ROCK ROAD

6! " 5" 6

BRO O KE R

RWOOD

RIV E

A CED

Verona Lake

LA NE

P AM GR

OAD

Spring Lake

E LA N

SILVER

Hardwood Creek

" S! 5

IN CH

ND ROAD V ERONA SA

CROSS ROAD

! 5

Pero Lake

6! " 5

" S! 5

Page 395 of 470

REVELL ROAD AD RO

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM10.1_StormSewerSystem_Verona.mxd

Verona Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

" ! 56

E IV DR

! 5" 6

Depot Creek Watershed

DRAWING #: REV:

6 "

CA R LETO

Meters

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

DRIV

! R" S" 6 S"

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

SALM O N

6 "

251 - 500 Pipe

YORK ROAD

! 5" 6" 6

RIV E

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

6 "

LE ND

! 5

IV R D E G D PINE RI

Catch Basin

Township Boundary

6 "

Storm Structure by Type

WD RIVE

Culvert

/ "

EVIE

Drainage Direction

LAK

Legend

! 5

REVELL ROAD

6 ! " 5

" S

TR EE T

! R

Maintenance Hole

6 "

Catch Basin

! 5

Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

" S

Double Catch Basin

! ?

Double Catch Basin Maintenance Hole

! . G

Oil Grit Separator

W X

Ditch Inlet

Rivers Hamlet Township Boundary Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland

7 6 ! " 5

Water

! R

! R ET

Storm Structure by Type

Road

RON AS T RE

Culvert

SHOR T ST R EET

/ "

ST R EET

Drainage Direction

Legend

WAT ER

E TE

6 ! R"

" S ! 5

CEM

VILLAGE OF VERONA TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

RY R OAD

STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

Ontario Quaternary Watershed Boundaries (LIO)* Assessment Parcel

DRIV E

7 Inlet

<250 Pipe 251 - 500 Pipe 501 - 750 Pipe 751 1050 Pipe

N ST R EET

MCM AHO N

Storm Sewer by Size (mm)

6 " 6 "

STATIO

7 Outlet

6 ! " 5

" S S ! 5"

GEN GE S T

REET

Verona Lake

*Hamlet falls within the Quinte Conservation Authority. 0

5 10

Meters

DRAWING #: REV:

UTM Zone 18 NAD 83

SWM-10.2

REVISION 1 - FEBRUARY 2022

Produced by the County of Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.

6 " " S

AD RO

E NE

S LA

SAND ROAD AVanluven N O R E Lake V

TL SER DE

Depot Creek Watershed

Verona Lake

Spring Lake

E LA N

SILVER

P AM GR

ANE ‘S L

LA NE

B LY

HA M

AN E

T BI N ES

HI N

BRO O KE R

RWOOD

RIV E

Hardwood Creek

A CED

OAD

Verona

6 ! " 5

LA NE

SWM-10.2

RO CK

Little Mud Lake

IN CH

ND ROAD V ERONA SA

Hambly Lake O RE MO

M LA E FAR

" S 6 "

! 5

CROSS ROAD

LE P MA

Pero Lake

BELL ROCK ROAD

YORK ROAD

VE I R D Page 396 of 470

6# " 7 AD RO

Document Path: K:\Projects 2022\SF CLI ECA Mapping\SWM10.2_StormSewerSystem_Verona.mxd

SWM-10.1

ROA D

ST O

Colebrook Dam Napanee River Watershed

" S ! 5

Page 397 of 470

Appendix D Risk Rating Systems Major Asset Group

Probability of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Consequence of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Roads

PCI Ratings – Inspections

Based on Road Class

85 to 100 = 1 70 to <85 = 2 55 to <70 = 3 40 to <55 = 4 0 to <40 = 5

Local = 3 Collector = 4 Arterial = 5

BCI Ratings – OSIM Reports

Based on Road Class

75 to 100 = 1 60 to <75 = 2 45 to <60 = 3 35 to <45 = 4 0 to <35 = 5

Bridge (Collector/Local) = 4 Bridge (Arterial) = 5

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 30 to <60 = 3 1 to <30 = 4 0 =5

Raw water intake = 5 Elevated Water Storage = 4 Treatment Plant = 5 UV/GAC Contactors = 5

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Size

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Services = 1 100mm = 2 150mm = 3 200mm = 4 250mm = 5

Bridges

Water Facilities

Water Mains

Culvert (Collector/Local) = 3 Culvert (Arterial) = 4

1|Page

Page 398 of 470

Major Asset Group

Probability of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Consequence of Failure Score (1 = low, 5 = high)

Water Valves, Hydrants and Services

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Valve - 250mm = 4 Valve - 150 to 200mm = 3 Hydrant = 4 Services = 1

Storm Sewers

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Size

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 4

<250mm = 1 250 to 375mm = 2 450 to 600mm = 3 675 to 900mm = 4 1050mm or > = 5

Manholes, Catchbasins and Ditch Inlets

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Manholes = 3 Double Catchbasin = 2 Catchbasin = 1 Ditch Inlet = 1

Storm Treatment Units

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Function

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 4

Mechanical Treatment Unit = 5

Culverts (< 3m diameter)

Remaining Useful Service Life

Based on Road Class

80 to 100 = 1 60 to <80 = 2 40 to <60 = 3 20 to <40 = 4 0 to <20 = 5

Culvert (Collector/Local) = 3 Culvert (Arterial) = 4

2|Page

Appendix E1 - Roads Roads ID

Street

From

Classification

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 3 5 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 5

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

5 20 15 15 15 12 15 12 15 12 10 15 15 15 15 20 9 10 10 15 15 15 3 10 6 6 6 10 6 5 10 10 9 9 9 6 6 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 15 10 10 9 6 6 3 10 6 5 6 5 5 3 3 3 6 10 5 3 5 10 10 10

Page 399 of 470

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Surface Type Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated Surface treated

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3 5 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 5 4 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

Page 400 of 470

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

12 12 12 10 12 12 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 9 9 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 15 9 6 5 9 9 6 3 3 9 9 9 3 3 12 9 6 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 8 6 6

Page 401 of 470

Roadside Environment

Street

From

Classification

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 15 10 9 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 10

Page 402 of 470

Roadside Environment

Street

Classification

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30 2022‐04‐30

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

10 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 3 3 3 3 15 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 15 6 6 6 6 6 3 10 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 3

Page 403 of 470

From

Street

From

Classification

Roadside Environment Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural Rural

Maintenace Class Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 5 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4 Class 4

Length (m)

Width (m)

Pavement Area (m2)

Last Inspection Date

Inspection OCI

5800 2650 2200 3800 2500 2600 1100 1050 4400 1200 1400 1350 2100 1450

6.3 6.7 5 5.5 4.5 5 4 6 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.2

36540 17755 11000 20900 11250 13000 4400 6300 27280 7920 9240 8910 13860 8990

67 73 80 87 73 76 87 90 94 100 100 100 100 100

Cost $/m assumed 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 270 450 450 450 270 270

Replacement Value Estimate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,566,000.00 715,500.00 594,000.00 1,026,000.00 675,000.00 702,000.00 297,000.00 283,500.00 1,188,000.00 540,000.00 630,000.00 607,500.00 567,000.00 391,500.00 266,467,700.00

Consequence of Condition/Probability of Failure (1 = good/not likely, Failure (1 = low, 5 = high) 5 = poor/likely) 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3

Install / Last Reconstruct Date

Useful Life

Risk

2020 2020 2020 2020 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 2022 2022 2022 2022

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

9 6 6 3 6 6 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3

2050 2050 2050 2050 2051 2051 2051 2051 2051 2052 2052 2052 2052 2052

Page 404 of 470