Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: December 21, 2021 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2021/Council - 21 Dec 2021 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
Page 1 of 264
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Audio Broadcast to the Townships Facebook Page http://www.facebook.com/SouthFrontenacTwp TIME: DATE: PLACE:
7:00 PM, Tuesday, December 21, 2021 Electronic Participation ONLY.
Call to Order and Roll Call
a)
Resolution
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
Approval of Agenda
a)
Resolution
Scheduled Closed Session - not applicable
Delegations - none
Public Meeting
Approval of Minutes - not applicable
Business Arising from the Minutes - not applicable
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Lake Ecosystem Grant • The Township accepted applications for a second intake of the Lake Ecosystem Grant program in October 2021. The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee is recommending approval of one application.
3-5
b)
Conservation Authority Transition Plans • This report is in regard Ontario Regulation 687/21, Section 3 that requires every Conservation Authority to develop a transition plan in place before December 31, 2021 and to advise participating municipalities of the timelines to meet the requirements
6 - 19
c)
Tender #PS-2021-30 - North Shore Road Culvert Replacement • This report provides a recommendation for the award of contract for
20 - 24
the North Shore Road Culvert Replacement (21-R03) and includes a request for a 2022 budget increase of $39,100 to be funded from the Asset Investment Reserve.
d)
COVID Relief Grant • This report recommends supporting a request received by the Frontenac Fury Girls’ Hockey Association for support under the COVID-19 Community Grant program.
25 - 27
Page 2 of 264
e)
New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report • The purpose of this report is to provide Council with a response to
28 180
the feedback received at the November 23rd Committee of the Whole meeting regarding the Policy Directions Report for South Frontenac’s new Official Plan, and to seek Council’s endorsement of that Policy Directions Report.
Committee Meeting Minutes
a)
Heritage Committee Meeting minutes of May 20, 2021
181 183
b)
Police Services Board Meeting minutes of September 23, 2021
184 187
By-laws
a)
Removal of 0.3 metre Reserve, Ed Zimolag, 1712 Hitchcock Drive - Storrington District - By-law 2021-75 • This report recommends that Council pass a by-law dedicating and
188 193
assuming a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve along Stone Point Road to facilitate the creation of one new residential lot
b)
Licence Agreement Application LA-03-21-S - Pine Point Lane By-law 2021-76 • An application has been received asking that Council consider
194 209
entering into a Licence Agreement to allow the development of a driveway and continued use of a portion of unopened road allowance by the owners for the purposes of access to the property. This report recommends that Council pass a by-law to approve that license agreement.
c)
Johnston Point Master Site Plan - By-law 2021-77 • This report provides information on the Johnston Point Master Site Plan application – which implements conditions from the Condominium Agreement and an Environmental Benefit Permit which govern the development of the 15 residential units and common elements in the Johnston Point Condominium – and recommends that Council pass a by-law to approve the Johnston Point Master Site Plan Agreement.
Reports for Information - not applicable
Information Items - not applicable
Notice of Motions
Announcements/Statements by Councillors
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
Closed Session (if requested)
Confirmatory By-law
a)
By-law 2021-78
Adjournment
a)
Resolution Natural, Vibrant and Growing - A Progressive Rural Leader
210 263
264
Page 3 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject: 2021 Lake Ecosystem Grant Second Intake Recommendations
Summary The Township accepted applications for a second intake of the Lake Ecosystem Grant program in October 2021. The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee is recommending approval of one (1) additional application as a result.
Recommendation That Council approve one (1) Lake Ecosystem Grant totalling $8,274 to the Queen’s University Arnott Lab for its Salt Runoff Impact Study as recommended by the Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee and as summarized in this report.
Background Council approved $24,500 in grants through the Lake Ecosystem Grant program on September 2, 2021. Council also authorized a second intake of the program to be issued in the fall of 2021. The Township accepted applications for a second intake of the Lake Ecosystem Grant program in October 2021. The program was advertised on the Township website and social media, as well as in the Frontenac News. Lake Associations were also sent the media release directly. The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee reviewed one (1) application at their meeting on December 8, 2021, and passed a resolution recommending Council approve funding that application.
Discussion/Analysis Two (2) applications were received by the Township in response to the second call for applications. The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee, through a subcommittee, reviewed the applications against the approved evaluation criteria per the Lake Ecosystem Grant www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 4 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - 2021 Lake Ecosystem Grant Second Intake Recommendations
Policy. Based on the application merits, they recommended that one (1) application be returned for further information. This application was withdrawn to provide time to refine the proposed project. They recommend the second application be fully funded. This application is summarized below: Applicant: Queen’s University Arnott Lab Project: This is a project submitted by two Master’s students in the Arnott Lab at Queen’s University. The main objective is to understand how road salt runoff impacts water quality and ecosystems in Sydenham Lake and Devil Lake. The researchers will measure seasonal changes in conductivity in the nearshore and offshore of the two lakes in 2022. They will study zooplankton salt tolerance by testing multiple species from different areas in the lakes and comparing them to other lakes in southern Ontario. This project will also tie into another project testing road salt alternatives. The researchers think that the project results will benefit the Township of South Frontenac, the Sydenham Lake Association, the Devil Lake Association, Cataraqui Conservation, as well as property owners and residents near the lakes. A report of the findings will be provided to the Township. The findings will demonstrate if there are effects of road salt in the lakes. Understanding the ecological effect of road salt and road salt alternatives can influence management decisions. The funds would be used to purchase equipment and supplies (e.g. conductivity meters and loggers, fuel) and to cover part of the salary for a summer student and a lab assistant. Amount Requested: $8,274 Recommended Funding: $8,274 The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee sees the value of this research for Sydenham Lake, as Sydenham’s source of drinking water, and for Devil Lake, which is an at-capacity lake trout lake. The findings would also have applicability to other lakes in the Township, as well as inform private and public road salt management practices. In addition to providing their findings report to the Township, the researchers will be asked to present the findings to the public, for example, through a future Lake Association Forum or lake association annual general meetings.
Financial Implications The 2021 operating budget included $30,000 in funding for the Lake Ecosystem Grant program in addition to a carryover of $30,000 from 2020 for a total of $60,000. There will be a remainder of $27,226 in the budget after the two application intakes in 2021.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 5 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - 2021 Lake Ecosystem Grant Second Intake Recommendations
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: 2. Promote and support growth than meets the community’s needs while maintaining the integrity of our natural environment. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation
Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee
Attachments None.
Approvals Report Prepared By: Gillian Lash, Chair, Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee Christine Woods, MCIP, RPP, Senior Planner Submitted By:
Claire Dodds RPP, MCIP Director of Development Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 6 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Office of the Clerk Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject: Conservation Authorities – Transition Plans
Summary This report is in regard to Ontario Regulation 687/21, Section 3 that requires every Conservation Authority to develop a transition plan before December 31, 2021 and to advise participating municipalities of the timelines to meet the requirements of new legislation as laid out in the plans.
Recommendation That the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac acknowledge receipt of the Quinte Conservation Transition Plan, the Rideau Valley Conservation Transition Plan, and the Cataraqui Conservation Transition Plan in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 687/21.
Background Earlier this year the provincial government made changes to the Conservation Authorities Act including the enactment of three new regulations. Ontario Regulation 687/21 Section 3 states that every Conservation Authority shall, on or before December 31, 2021, (a) develop a transition plan that includes a timeline for the authority to meet the requirements for the first and second phases of the transition period, as set out in the Regulation, (b) send a copy of the transition plan to each participating municipality in the authority’s area of jurisdiction and to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, and (c) publish a copy of the transition plan on the authority’s website or make the transition plan available to the public by such other means as the authority considers advisable;
Discussion/Analysis As part of the regulation requirements, Council is being asked to acknowledge the Transition Plans of the Conservation Authorities whose jurisdictions lie within the www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 7 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Conservation Authorities – Transition Plans
boundaries of South Frontenac, as outlined in the attachments. Municipal approval of the transition plans is not required.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation
Conservation Authorities
Attachments
- Quinte Conservation Authority Transition Plan
- Cataraqui Conservation Authority Transition Plan
- Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Transition Plan
Approvals Submitted By:
Angela Maddocks Clerk Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 8 of 264
Transition Plan Pursuant to Section 21.1.4 of the Conservation Authorities Act , R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27 Ontario Regulation 687/21: Transition Plans and Agreements for Programs and Services under Section 21.1.2 of the CA Act.
December 8, 2021
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 9 of 264 Page 2 of 3 Transition Plan December 8, 2021
Introduction Ontario Regulation 687/21, Transition Plans and Agreements for Programs and Services under Section 21.1.2 of the Conservation Authorities Act (the Act), requires Conservation Authorities to develop and implement a Transition Plan to ensure compliance with subsection 21.1.4(1) of the Act. The purpose of the Transition Plan is to outline Cataraqui Conservation’s workplan for completing the necessary programs & services inventory and cost-apportioning agreements with watershed municipalities over the transition period (October 1, 2021 – January 1, 2024) to support nonmandated programs and services. The Transition Plan is in effect for eleven (11) municipalities in whole or in part within Cataraqui Conservation’s watershed. With regard to the Cataraqui Source Protection Area requirements under the Clean Water Act, the Township of Frontenac Islands is also included. Participating Counties within the watershed include Frontenac County, Lennox & Addington County, and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville. The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks will also be circulated. Township of Athens City of Brockville Township of Elizabethtown-Kitley Township of Front of Yonge Town of Gananoque City of Kingston
Township of Leeds & the Thousand Islands Loyalist Township Town of Greater Napanee Township of Rideau Lakes Township of South Frontenac
Below is a summary of the timeline and deliverables for Phase 1: Transition Plan & Inventory Development and Phase 2: Municipal Agreement Development. Phase 1 Implementation – Transition Plan & Inventory Development Requirement Action / Deliverable Transition Plan Development Summary of upcoming E-mail update to all watershed deliverables with municipalities municipalities Obtain Board approval of Report IR-116-21 – Proposed Transition Plan Transition Plan Submit and Circulate Transition Approved Transition Plan to MECP, Plan municipalities and online Programs & Services Inventory Development Consult and collaborate with Bi-weekly calls and meetings as neighbouring Conservation necessary Authorities for consistency Engage Board on scope of nonStaff report outlining options mandatory programs and services & cost apportioning agreements required Obtain Board approval of Draft Programs & Services Inventory Programs & Services Inventory Submit and Circulate Programs Approved Programs & Services & Services Inventory Inventory
Deadline November 4, 2021 December 8, 2021 December 31, 2021
Ongoing
January 26, 2022
February 23, 2022 February 28, 2022
Page 10 of 264 Page 3 of 3 Transition Plan December 8, 2021 Phase 2 Implementation – Municipal Agreement Development Requirements Municipal consultation period to elicit feedback and establish negotiating timelines Adjust Programs & Services Inventory as required based on municipal feedback and complete required quarterly reporting
Consultation with neighbouring Conservation Authorities Negotiate cost-apportioning agreements as required
Cataraqui Conservation Budget Development and Consultation Municipal Agreements Extension request Cataraqui Conservation Budget Approval Final Report / Transition Date
Deliverable One-on-one outreach Council presentation (as requested) Municipal Workshop Log of feedback received Mandatory reports completed Staff reports to the Board
Meetings as required
Deadline March 1, 2022 - June 17, 2022
Mandatory Reporting: July 1, 2022 October 1, 2022 January 1, 2023 April 1, 2023 July 1, 2023 October 1, 2023 March 1, 2022 - June 30, 2023
Meetings with municipal staff Develop and circulate draft agreements Council meetings as required Cost-apportioning agreements with municipalities finalized Draft Operating & Capital Budget for 2024 incorporating cost-sharing models Letter to MECP (if required)
March 1, 2022 - June 30, 2023
Approved 2024 Operating & Capital Budget Execute municipal agreements
December 2023
June 30 - November 30, 2023
October 1, 2023
January 1, 2024
Notes:
- The Board will receive the Transition Plan, Programs & Services Inventory, and all reporting requirements prior to submission and circulation.
Deadlines are based on current regulations. Timelines may be influenced by the issuance of new related regulations.
Lennox & Addington County, United Counties of Leeds & Grenville, Frontenac County will be kept fully informed throughout the process.
All deliverables listed within Ontario Regulation 687/21 – Mandatory Programs and Services will be initiated in 2022 and municipalities, partners, and the public engaged throughout 2022-2024 for completion of deliverables by December 31, 2024. For Cataraqui Conservation, these include: o o o
Asset Management Plans & Operating Manuals for ten Water Control Structures Conservation Lands Inventory & Strategy Core Watershed-Based Resource Strategy
Page 11 of 264
TRANSITION PLAN Introduction The passage of Regulation 687/21 “Transition Plans and Agreements for Programs and Services Under Section 21.1.2 of the Act” requires the development of Transition Plans by each Conservation Authority. The Transition Plans are to outline the process and timelines for the development of cost apportioning agreements with municipalities within their jurisdiction for non-mandated programs and services. Regulated Timelines Phase I Transition Plan The Transition Plan is required to be completed by December 31, 2021. All the member municipalities of Quinte Conservation will be distributed the Transition Plan. In addition, the Transition Plan must be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) and posted to the Quinte Conservation website. Prior to the distribution of the Transition Plan, the QC Executive Board will be required to receive and approve the plan. The Transition Plan is valid for the following 18 municipalities that are partially or entirely within the jurisdiction of Quinte Conservation: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City of Belleville (entirely) City of Quinte West (partially) County of Prince Edward (entirely) Loyalist Township (partially) Municipality of Center Hastings (partially) Municipality of Marmora and Lake (partially) Municipality of Tweed (entirely) Stirling and Rawdon Township (partially) Town of Deseronto (entirely) Town of Greater Napanee (partially) Township of Addington Highlands (partially) Township of Central Frontenac (partially) Township of Madoc (entirely) Township of North Frontenac (partially) Township of South Frontenac (partially) Township of Stone Mills (entirely) Tudor and Cashel Township (partially) Tyendinaga Township (entirely)
Inventory of Programs and Services An inventory of program and services is to be prepared and circulated to member municipalities within Quinte Conservation’s jurisdiction by February 28, 2022. The inventory of programs and services will be classified as either Category 1 Mandatory, Category 2 Non-Mandatory or Category 3 Other. These categories are identified in Section 21 of the Conservation Authorities Act. The inventory will include an estimate of the annual cost of the service, sources of funding and the percentage attributed to each funding source.
Page 12 of 264
In addition, a record of the municipal distribution of the inventory is to be forwarded to the MECP. Any changes to the inventory after February 22, 2022, will be documented and forwarded to MECP. Phase II Municipal Agreements All municipal agreements for non-mandated services are to be in place by January 1, 2024. Quinte Conservation will discuss with the 18 municipal partners the agreements for non-mandated but important watershed wide programs and services. The discussions will be undertaken upon the circulation of the inventory in February 2022. In addition, Quinte Conservation have begun consultation with neighbouring Conservation Authorities to ensure we are coordinating programs and services to meet the needs of our shared municipal partners and watershed residents. Quinte Conservation will meet the quarterly progress reporting requirements to the MECP as per the regulation. Timeline Summary Chart Deliverable Develop Transition Plan Obtain Board Approval of the Transition Plan Post Transition Plan to website Develop Programs and Services Inventory with Board approval Circulate Inventory of Programs and Services to member municipalities and MECP Discuss cost apportioning agreements with member municipalities Consultation with neighbouring CA Execute municipal agreements Quarterly Reporting to MECP
Request for extension of transition date Final Report
DUE DATE December 31, 2021 December 2, 2021
TIMELINE October 20 to Nov. 10, 2021
December 31, 2021 By Feb. 10, 2022
February 28, 2022
November 15, 2021, to September 30, 2023
January 1, 2024
August 15, 2021, to November 1, 2023 Finalize August/September 2023
July 1, 2022 October 1, 2022 January 1, 2023 April 1, 2023 July 1, 2023 October 1, 2023 October 1, 2023 (If required) January 30, 2024
Notes: The due dates are based on the current regulations. Timelines may be influenced by the issuance of new related regulations.
Page 13 of 264
Via Email December 15, 2021 RVCA Member Municipalities
Re:
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Transition Plan
Dear Member Municipality, Please find enclosed the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority’s Transition Plan. Our Transition Plan identifies steps we will take to align with transition period requirements under the recently amended Conservation Authorities Act. This Transition Plan is being shared with each of the Authority’s partner municipalities, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks and is publicly available on the Authority’s website. You will also receive similar Transition Plans from your municipality’s other conservation authority partners. To prepare for future discussions, we are creating a programs and service inventory to be shared in early 2022. The inventory will include a cost estimate of each RVCA program in addition to placing them under one of the following categories: Category 1: Mandatory programs and services prescribed by regulation Category 2: Municipal services Category 3: Other watershed programs and services funded via municipal cost apportioning agreements. Most of RVCA’s current programs and services reside within those prescribed by regulation (Category 1) and municipal services (Category 2). A small number of programs that the RVCA has delivered for decades for the benefit of the watershed and its residents are expected to reside under Category 3. We invite you to review the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks’ environmental registry decision notice for background information on the changes to the Conservation Authorities Act and regulations. More information is also found on the Association of Municipalities of Ontario website, including fact sheets for municipalities. RVCA will continue to keep you updated at key milestones and of course we look forward to working with you in 2022 and 2023.
Page 14 of 264
As always, please contact our office if you have any questions or would like to request a presentation to your Council.
Sincerely,
Pieter Leenhouts Chair
Attached:
Sommer Casgrain-Robertson General Manager / Secretary-Treasurer
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Transition Plan - November 25, 2021
Page 15 of 264
Transition Plan Pursuant to Section 21.1.4 of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27 Ontario Regulation 687/21: Transition Plans and Agreements for Programs and Services under Section 21.1.2 of the Act
November 25, 2021
Page 16 of 264 Transition Plan
Introduction This Transition Plan identifies the steps the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) will undertake to meet phase 1 and phase 2 transition period requirements prescribed under Section 21.1.2 of the Conservation Authorities Act (the “Act”) and Ontario Regulation 687/21. A timeline of RVCA’s undertakings is shown in Appendix A and RVCA intends to implement all regulatory requirements outlined below in advance of its 2024 Budget. Inventory of Programs and Services RVCA will prepare a programs and services inventory by February 28, 2022. The inventory will contain an estimate of the annual cost of each program and service and categorize them as follows: Category 1: Mandatory programs and services prescribed by regulation Category 2: Municipal services Category 3: Other watershed programs and services funded via municipal cost apportioning agreements. A copy of the inventory will be circulated to all member municipalities. RVCA will maintain a record of the municipalities circulated and will provide a copy of said record and the inventory to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). RVCA may make changes to the inventory from time to time as discussions evolve with member municipalities. RVCA will record any changes in quarterly progress reports to MECP. Municipal Service Agreements (Category 2) RVCA currently delivers a variety of services on behalf of, or at the request of, individual member municipalities. Agreements currently in place with municipalities for these services will be reviewed to ensure they comply with any new requirements prescribed in the Act and regulations. It is anticipated that most, if not all, will meet or exceed the new requirements. Should any adjustments be required, RVCA will work with municipalities to amend agreements accordingly. Municipal Cost Apportioning Agreements (Category 3) Following circulation of the Programs and Services Inventory, RVCA will consult with member municipalities to develop cost apportioning agreements to finance Category 3: Other Watershed Programs. These agreements will be in place prior to January 1, 2024.
November 25, 2021
Page 1 of 4
Page 17 of 264
Transition Plan
Conservation Authority Partner Coordination RVCA will work closely with neighbouring, partner conservation authorities to ensure shared member municipalities receive consistent communication and uninterrupted services. Circulation A copy of this Transition Plan shall be shared with each member municipality, MECP and stakeholders identified in Appendix B by December 31, 2021. A copy of the Transition Plan will be made available on the Authority’s website. Consultation RVCA continues its commitment to ongoing and open communication with its partners and stakeholders. Staff and the Board will make themselves available to municipal councils and municipal staff at all times throughout this process.
November 2021
Page 2 of 4
Page 18 of 264
Transition Plan
Appendix A
Timeline
Transition Period Phase 1 Deliverables
Due
Circulate Transition Plan to member municipalities and MECP
Dec. 31, 2021
Transition Plan available to the public
Dec. 31, 2021
Programs and Services Inventory reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors
Feb. 28, 2022
Circulate Inventory to member municipalities and MECP
Feb. 28, 2022
Transition Period Phase 2 Deliverables
Due
Consult with member municipalities regarding cost apportioning agreements
Throughout
Consult with neighbouring conservation authorities
Throughout
Reports to MECP
July 1, 2022 Oct. 1, 2022 Jan. 1, 2023 April 1, 2023 July 1, 2023 Oct. 1, 2023
Request transition period extension (if necessary)
Oct. 1, 2023
Municipal cost apportionment agreements in place
Jan. 1, 2024
Final Report to MECP
Jan. 31, 2024
November 2021
Page 3 of 4
Page 19 of 264
Transition Plan
Appendix B Stakeholder Notice List Member Municipalities • Township of Athens • Augusta Township • Township of Beckwith • Township of Central Frontenac • City of Clarence-Rockland • Township of Drummond/North Elmsley • Township of Elizabethtown-Kitley • Village of Merrickville-Wolford • Township of Montague • Township of North Dundas • Municipality of North Grenville • City of Ottawa • Town of Perth • Township of Rideau Lakes • Town of Smiths Falls • Township of South Frontenac • Tay Valley Township • Village of Westport Partner Counties • County of Lanark • Frontenac County • United Counties of Leeds and Grenville • United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks
November 2021
Page 4 of 4
Page 20 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Public Services Deparment Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject: Tender # PS-2021-30 - North Shore Road Culvert Replacement
Summary This report provides a recommendation for the award of contract for the North Shore Road Culvert Replacement (21-R03) and includes a request for a 2022 budget increase of $39,100 to be funded from the Asset Investment Reserve.
Recommendation That Council accept the bid from Len Corcoran Excavation Ltd. in the amount of $300,309.02 (Including Non-Refundable HST) for the North Shore Road Culvert Replacement project; and, That pre budget approval for 2022 be granted for a project budget increase in the amount of $39,100 be funded from the Asset Investment Reserve.
Background In January of this year Council approved its 2021 Operating and Capital budgets which included the replacement of the North Shore Road Culvert (1400mm diameter) with the widening of the roadway and guide rails. The project which was designed this summer involves some unique construction challenges that include: limited staging areas, proximity to environmentally sensitive areas, and the requirement to maintain emergency/public access over the roadway throughout the duration of construction. On November 3rd, 2021, the Township released tenders for the project and advertised on the Township’s website. On December 1st, 2021, the bid period for the tender closed with a total of six (6) tender submissions received. Two (2) of the tenders were subsequently found to be incomplete and were rejected based on the requirements of the procurement bylaw. The results of the remaining tender bids were as follows:
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 21 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Tender # PS-2021-30 - North Shore Road Culvert Replacement
Supplier Len Corcoran Excavation Ltd.
Total (Inc. Non-Refundable HST) $300,309.02
AWD Contractors
$372,235.03
AARDE Construction Ltd. Crains Construction Ltd.
$374,562.02 $596,525.26
All the remaining tender submissions were reviewed for accuracy and found to be compliant with the Township’s procurement bylaw.
Discussion/Analysis Staff also completed a detailed review of the bid from Len Corcoran Excavation Ltd. and have confirmed that the low bidder has successfully completed projects of similar scope for the City of Kingston. The North Shore Road Culvert Replacement project is located approximately 155m northeast of Hewlett-Packard Lane on a dead-end section of the road. The current culvert crossing includes a 1300mm CSP pipe combined with a 1200mm x 2154mm three-sided cast-in-place concrete box culvert. This crossing was part of the bridge/large culvert inspection program in 2019 and found to be in poor condition and exhibiting signs of structural failure. Residents and emergency vehicles rely on this crossing to access properties northeast of the culvert and therefore near-term replacement is necessary. It is therefore recommended that the low bid from Len Corcoran Excavation Ltd. be accepted and that the Township proceeds with the award of contract.
Financial Implications The 2021 Budget allowance for the overall project is $340,300 based on the original scope (see attached capital detail sheet). During 2021, the detailed design work for the project was completed and as part of the permit approvals process some modifications to the work were triggered including the addition of a new concrete headwall structure to manage erosion and scour on the north side of the road. To move forward with the project, the Township requires additional funding of approximately $39,100 which includes necessary expenses for reinstatements of the hard surface of the roadway, project management, quality assurance testing and associated contingencies. The additional funding would be allocated from the asset investment reserve and would have a negligible impact on long range financial planning.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 22 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Tender # PS-2021-30 - North Shore Road Culvert Replacement
A breakout of the revised project budget is provided below:
ACTIVITY
COST ($)
Design / Permits (forecasted to year end)
$16,000.00
Len Corcoran Excavation Ltd. (low bid Net HST)
$300,309.02
Hard Surfacing Reinstatement (DST) – Town Contract Administration / Quality Assurance Testing / As-built Drawings
$15,000.00
Subtotal
$346,309.02
Contingency Allowance - (10% of Construction & CA only)
$33,030.90
Revised Project Budget (Inc. Non-Refundable HST)
$379,339.92
Approved Budget (2021)
$340,300.00
Estimated Shortfall
$39,039.92
$15,000.00
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation • • • •
Chief Administrative Officer Director of Corporate Services & Treasurer Director of Public Services Acting Manager of Operations and Fleet
Attachments
- North Shore Road Culvert 2021 Capital Detail Sheet
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 23 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Tender # PS-2021-30 - North Shore Road Culvert Replacement
Approvals Submitted By:
Ronnie Joslin, RCJI Construction and Technical Services Technologist Reviewed By:
W. Troy Dunlop, C.E.T. Manager of Technical Services and Infrastructure Reviewed By:
Charles Croll, MSc., C.E.T., PMP Director of Public Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 24 of 264
Page 25 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Corporate Services Department Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject: COVID-19 Community Grant Request
Summary This report recommends supporting a request received by the Frontenac Fury Girls’ Hockey Association for support under the COVID-19 Community Grant program.
Recommendation That Council approve a COVID-19 Community Grant to the Frontenac Fury Girls’ Hockey Association in the amount of $5,000; and, That the request be funded from the Township’s Working Funds Reserve being the designated reserve from which the original COVID-19 Community Grant program was allocated.
Background In the 2021 budget, Council allocated funding in the amount of $250,000 to a targeted financial relief and support program for those affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. At the March 2nd Council meeting, Council approved the details of that program including the allocation of the $250,000. The first intake of the support for not-for-profits and Community Groups was issued earlier in the year with payments distributed in June. The first intake of these grants had 13 applications that totalled $79,513.65 with an amount of $90,486.35 remaining. A second intake was issued in July and only one (1) application was received and supported in the amount of $5,000.00 providing a remaining available amount of $85,486.35. At the September 21st, 2021, Council supported closing the COVID-19 Community Grant program and returning the balance of funds to the Working Fund Reserve.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 26 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - COVID-19 Community Grant Request
At its regular meeting on December 7, 2021, Council approved an additional COVID-19 Community Grant in the amount of $10,000 for the Frontenac Minor Hockey Association to help offset anticipated operating shortfalls during their 2021/22 hockey season. This grant was recommended for approval despite the program having been closed because it met the intent and criteria for the program and significant funds went unspent during the first two intakes.
Discussion/Analysis A request has been received from the Frontenac Fury Girls’ Hockey Association (FF) to provide support under the COVID Community Grant program. Although the Township issued two intakes to this program with the program closing on September 21st, FF did not consider submitting through these intakes because at that time they were not in a position to assess the impact of COVID measures on their operations since the hockey season at the Frontenac Community Arena only began in September 2021. The application from FF qualifies under the operating/fundraising deficit streams in that FF is anticipating a significant operating shortfall this season. Despite the COVID Community Grant Program being officially closed, staff considered that it was significantly undersubscribed, that the applicant could not have had the required information to apply during the original intake periods, and that operating support for an important community sports and recreation program is in keeping with Council’s intended recipients of the program. For these reasons, and after a review of FF’s financials from 2020/21 and 2021/22 seasons, the application is recommended for approval in the maximum amount of $5,000.
Financial Implications The recommendations of this report will result in funding in the amount of $5,000 provided to the Frontenac Fury under the COVID-19 relief program from the amount of $75,486.35 which was returned to the Working Fund Reserve (following the recent $10,000 allocation) with the closing of the second intake.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. •
Priority: N/A
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 27 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - COVID-19 Community Grant Request
Attachments None.
Approvals Submitted By:
Louise Fragnito Director of Corporate Services and Treasurer Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 28 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject:
South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
Summary The purpose of this report is to provide Council with a response to the feedback received at the November 23rd Committee of the Whole meeting regarding the Policy Directions Report for South Frontenac’s new Official Plan, and to seek Council’s endorsement of that Policy Directions Report.
Recommendation That the November 23, 2021 Policy Directions report prepared by Dillon Consulting be endorsed to set the direction for drafting the new South Frontenac Official Plan.
Background The Township has been undertaking background review and public consultation to prepare a new Official Plan throughout 2019-2021. The process has included: • • • • • • • • •
background information review; a residential and employment (industrial) land needs analysis; employment and housing forecasting; policy brochures; public engagement; indigenous consultation; stakeholder feedback; online surveys; and, Council approval of Official Plan Goals, Vision, and Guiding Principles.
The background technical analysis and consultation completed to date were used to inform the development of policy directions to guide the development of the new Official Plan. These policy directions were set out in a report that was prepared in the fall of 2021 and subsequently presented to Council for feedback at a Committee of the Whole meeting on www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 29 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
November 23, 2021. At the November 23, 2021 meeting, Township staff and Dillon Consulting Ltd. presented the findings of that Report and members of Council were provided a forum to discuss the recommendations and provide feedback on the identified themes and policy directions. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with a response to feedback and comments received at the COTW meeting and seek Council’s endorsement of the Policy Directions Report.
Discussion/Analysis The following subsections provide a summary of the comments received by theme area, with an associated response and recommendation for advancing the project where applicable. Theme Area # 1: Growth Management & Settlement Areas Feedback: •
Council discussed the challenge of directing growth to Settlement Areas when most of the residential growth in the Township is within rural areas. There will need to be a balance of providing opportunities for limited rural residential growth while supporting compact village-scale urban development to meet the Township’s growth targets.
Response: •
•
•
•
The existing Official Plan (2003) contains policies that direct most of the growth to the Settlement Areas, which is in keeping with the provincial and county policy directions for growth management. Despite having policies in place in the existing Official Plan to promote compact village-scale development in the settlement areas, the growth has been generally occurring within the rural areas of the Township. This is due, in part, to other policies within the existing Official Plan that provide opportunity for development in the rural areas through consent. The lack of servicing alternatives to private water and sewage systems has been another constraint. The technical analysis completed by the consulting team indicates that there will continue to be a need to accommodate some future growth within the rural areas; however, it does recommend that most of the future growth comparable to current village density be directed to the Settlement Areas. This is achieved by considering how settlement area and rural residential land division policies work together to achieve growth management objectives. The project team will explore servicing alternatives to private servicing and opportunities to facilitate communal or municipal servicing over the next 25 years. A County communal servicing information website has been set up at https://engagefrontenac.ca/communal-services. Directing the majority of growth to settlement areas will provide the Township with opportunities to achieve a broader housing mix, address some housing affordability
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 30 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
challenges and align with provincial directions respecting growth management while balancing the anticipated future demand for rural housing options. Theme Area # 2: Housing Feedback: • •
Communal servicing options are needed to support the desired level of growth in the Township. Council would also like to see support in the Official Plan for a wider variety and range of sizes of housing options, from tiny homes to mobile home parks to sixplexes, and identified that providing a policy framework that would support the development of more rental housing options would be beneficial given the current lack of options for rental tenure in South Frontenac.
Response: •
•
Township Staff is working with the County to structure communal servicing and mitigate financial risk to help facilitate a wider range of housing opportunities within the villages. Implementing communal servicing will provide the opportunity for development to occur at a scale more similar to historic village density (e.g. core areas of Sydenham and Verona) and will start to remove barriers that have historically limited the number of units that can be developed in a single project. The project team will define tiny homes and mobile homes in the Official Plan, and include policies to permit mobile and modular home parks. Park model trailers would also be permitted within recreational trailer parks. It is recognized all homes must adhere to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code. The Official Plan will provide a framework for where different dwelling types will be permitted throughout the Township. It may also recommend that the size of dwellings be governed through the Ontario Building Code rather than be established by minimums set in the zoning by-law.
Provincial policy requires municipalities, through their Official Plans, to provide opportunities for a range and mix of housing types, including affordable housing options. The Official Plan will include policies to support this wider variety and range of housing types and sizes. Theme Area # 3: Employment Lands and Economic Vitality Feedback: • • •
Council highlighted that servicing will limit the possible uses of industrial lands to dry or light industrial uses. Council expressed concerns about directing industrial uses into settlement areas. Council expressed concern over the reliability of internet services in the Township and inquired about what options and avenues are available to require developers to provide high speed internet services as a condition of development approval.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 31 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
Response: • •
•
The Official Plan project team will update maps to reflect Official Plan policies for industrial, rural, and urban areas. The Official Plan will consider the creation of a rural industrial employment area as well as establish supportive policies for employment uses that are more compatible with residential uses within settlement areas. The Official Plan will stress the importance of internet connectivity but operational details of bringing high-speed internet to the Township are the responsibility of development standards. The CRTC recently declared high speed internet as a public service, which may provide an opportunity for the Township to explore implementing this through conditions of draft plan approval for subdivisions in the future.
Theme Area # 4: Waterfront Feedback: •
•
•
Council requested a community planning permit system to be used across the Township for minor variance, site plan, shoreline protection, and site alteration controls. Council provided feedback that there is a need for clear policies for replacing and enlarging structures within 30 metres of the high water mark. This should be supplemented with additional requirements for preserving and enhancing vegetation within the 30 metre setback buffer. There was a request to maintain the existing waterfront lot size for creation and required water frontage.
Response: •
• •
As identified in the Policy Directions Report, the Official Plan will include policies to enable the Township to introduce a community planning permit system which could be used for the waterfront area, specifically, or in other identified areas across the Township. Policies regarding structures within the 30 metres setback area will be clarified through the development of the New Official Plan. Policies can be developed requiring a landscaped vegetative planting plan as a condition of development within the 30 metre buffer area from the high water mark of a water body.
Theme Area # 5: Rural Consent Policy Feedback: •
There was interest from some Councillors to look at developing policy to differentiate the number of severances that could be permitted in the rural designation based on the productivity of land.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 32 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
•
•
Other Councillors expressed that the public indicated they don’t want to see more strip development, it increases pressure on the roads and limits the ability to maintain the rural character of the Township. Council would like to support the concept of providing limited infill development where services exist over and above the current three-severance allocation in the Township.
Response: •
•
•
Public feedback indicated that the existing limit for rural severances should be maintained and housing should be directed to urban Settlement Areas and diversified in order to support affordable housing and senior housing options. The Official Plan will contain policies to permit a maximum of three (3) severances on a lot of record existing on the day of adoption of the 2000 Official Plan by Council, where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision. The severance limit may be waived to allow limited rural residential development by way of infilling where criteria are met. Based on a review of recently approved Official Plans within Eastern Ontario, it appears that they do not differentiate where rural severances are permitted on basis of land classification. Classification is based on prime agricultural lands versus rural designation. Common practice is to permit a maximum number of lots that can be created from original lot from time of amalgamation. Not many municipalities have been permitted to re-set the clock to provide for additional residential lot creation beyond infill opportunities within the rural designation. Outside of identifying land as prime agricultural or rural, it is not recommended that the further classification of rural lands be completed as a way to differentiate allocation of rural consents.
Theme Area # 6: Agriculture Feedback: •
•
Council expressed the need to protect prime agricultural farmland through MDS and impact assessments. It was also acknowledged that directing growth to Settlement Areas will also protect productive farmland. There was some question about the types of uses that could be permitted on agricultural lands within the Township.
Response: •
The Official Plan will update its policies on permitted uses for agricultural lands in order to support a systems-based approach to agriculture and related industries and reflect the policy guidance from OMAFRA respecting permitted uses within prime agricultural areas. This has been identified as an area that needs to be addressed through the New Official Plan for conformity purposes with both the County and Provincial plans. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 33 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
Theme Area # 7: Natural Heritage Feedback: •
Council specifically recognized the importance of provincially significant wetlands in providing flood control, water quality management, and species habitat and indicated that they would like 120 metre setbacks and stronger policies for the protection of provincially significant wetlands in the new Official Plan.
Response: •
The Official Plan project team will include these requests in the development of the Official Plan draft document.
Theme Area # 8: Climate Change Feedback: •
Council would like recognition that provincially significant wetlands provide protection to the Township’s environment and assist in managing the impact of variable precipitation due to climate change.
Response: •
•
The policy directions report includes recommendations that the New Official Plan include policies that encourage green infrastructure as well as other policies that would assist in addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation. Provincial and County planning policies require the protection of environmental features such as Provincially Significant Wetlands. Policies that will highlight the importance of these natural features and provide for their protection will be incorporated into the New Official Plan.
Theme Area # 9: Transportation Feedback: • •
Council noted that public transit is not available in rural areas, although discussion on how to increase availability has begun. Feedback received also indicated that there is a need to recognize and promote transportation options that lower carbon emissions.
Response: •
•
Feedback respecting the low-carbon emission transportation options will be recognized and promoted, and considerations for the supporting infrastructure (i.e. electric charging stations, carpooling, active transportation) will be addressed in the new Official Plan. On-demand transit is proving to be a viable solution for transit in communities such as South Frontenac, and policies supporting rural on-demand transit will be included in the Official Plan. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 34 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
•
•
The Official Plan will encourage partnerships with surrounding municipalities to provide opportunities for effective and cost-efficient delivery of transportation services to Township residents. The Official Plan project team will include policies supporting active transportation and connected transportation options within the Township.
Theme Area # 10: Cultural Heritage Feedback: •
A question was raised about why Aboriginal consultation had not been initiated in 2019. In 2019, engagement with First Nations communities was not a project priority.
Response: •
•
In 2019, engagement with our First Nations communities was not top of mind. Staff knew there was the need to make this engagement and relationship building a critical part of the Official Plan development which is why it was an important part of the RFP that was prepared for this project. An indigenous engagement specialist is part of Dillon’s Official Plan project core team and has been working to help us ensure that we are pursuing meaningful engagement with our First Nation Communities on this project. The Official Plan project team will continue to engage and consult with Aboriginal communities, particularly when aligning shared environmental and cultural heritage/archaeological goals. Staff have been impressed that in the conversations we have had with our First Nation partners to date – while we may bring differing perspectives and understandings to the conversation – our core values around protecting the environment are very similar.
Theme Area # 11: Parkland & Public Waterfront Access Feedback: •
Council would like to see dedicated parks and open space within new development, with the opportunity for developers to provide land or cash-in-lieu to the Township.
Response: •
Continued public access to waterfront areas is important, and there is a possibility for the Township to inform the public on waterfront access rights and how to protect waterbodies from invasive species and maintain water quality.
Conclusion Based on feedback received during the November 23 rd Committee of the Whole meeting, staff and consultants recommend endorsing the Policy Directions Report as presented. The project team will continue to have a dialogue with Council and incorporate Council’s feedback, as appropriate, in developing the New Official Plan.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 35 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
Ensuring the alignment of the Official Plan with the goals of the Township and Council’s strategic priorities will be an ongoing collaboration between Council and the Official Plan project team. Further opportunities for Council feedback will be provided when Draft 1 of the New Official Plan is completed.
Financial Implications The Official Plan is a budgeted capital project in 2021.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☐ Not applicable to this report. ☒ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • • •
Priority: 2. Promote and support growth than meets the community’s needs while maintaining the integrity of our natural environment. Priority: 4. Be a catalyst for the creation of vibrant, complete communities. Action Item (if applicable): Item No. D(3) New OP
Notice/Consultation The following staff and consultants were consulted in the preparation of this report:
Megan Reddy, Planner, Dillon Consulting Kelly Martel, Project Manager, Dillon Consulting Christine Woods, Senior Planner Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer Sonya Bolton, Manager of Community Planning, County of Frontenac Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning & Economic Development, County of Frontenac
Attachments • •
Attachment 1 – Official Plan Policy Directions Report, November 2021 Attachment 2 – Appendix B – Engagement Summary
Approvals Report prepared by Kelly Martell (Dillon Consulting), Megan Reddy (Dillon Consulting) and Claire Dodds (South Frontenac)
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 36 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - South Frontenac New Official Plan - Recommendations on the Policy Directions Report
Submitted By:
Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Policy Directions Report South Frontenac 2040 Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan November 2021 – 21-1531
Page 37 of 264
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Table of Contents 1.
Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.1 Where We’ve Been …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 1.2 Where We’re Going…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 1.3 Organization of this Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.
Land Needs Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6
2.1 Population, Housing and Employment Forecast Background …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 2.2 Urban Residential Land Needs, 2046 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.3 Urban Industrial Land Needs, 2046 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 2.4 Additional Industrial Lands ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 3.
Engagement Outcomes ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11
Policy Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16
Proposed Structure for the New Official Plan …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 29
5.1 Official Plan Structure ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 5.2 Next Steps …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 30 Appendix A – Policy Recommendation Matrix ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 Appendix B – Engagement Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 51
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 1
Page 38 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
- Introduction Under the provincial Planning Act, an Official Plan (O.P.) must be updated every five years, or every 10 years after the approval of a new O.P. The current, in-force Township of South Frontenac O.P. was approved in 2003. Since that time, a number of revisions to the Planning Act and Provincial Policy Statement (P.P.S) have been made that require the Township to revisit the O.P. in order to ensure it remains consistent with Ontario’s present-day legislative and policy planning framework. Accordingly, it is now time for the Township of South Frontenac to develop a new O.P. to direct growth and development in the Township for the next 20 years and beyond. This O.P. should be an expression of Council’s vision for the future development of the municipality, and provides policies regarding protection of the valuable natural resources of the Township while specifying the conditions under which future growth will be accommodated.
1.1 Where We’ve Been During 2019, South Frontenac began the process of developing a new O.P. Initial engagement and public consultation was conducted by the Township, but with the onset of the Coronavirus pandemic in early 2020, the process of creating a new O.P. and all public engagement was put on hold until effective virtual consultation could be put in place to undertake public consultation safely during the pandemic. From those engagement sessions, the municipality learned that Housing, Agriculture, Lake Ecosystems, and Economic Development were four key themes needed to be addressed in a new O.P. In the early winter of 2021, The Township re-initiated the process to prepare a new O.P., and issued a formal call for submissions from consulting firms to assist the Township in developing a New O.P. Following a competitive Request for Proposal process, Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon), in partnership with Watson & Associates Economists Limited were selected as the successful proponent for the project and retained by the Township of South Frontenac to continue the O.P. work, building off of the work previously undertaken by the Township. Since the re-initiation of the New O.P. project, the project team has developed policy brochures, engaged with the public, and begun developing policy direction recommendations to guide the new O.P. Through these key touchpoints with Council and the public, the following Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles have been developed for the O.P.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 2
Page 39 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Vision for the Official Plan: South Frontenac is a progressive, forward-looking municipality that balances facilitating growth that meets the needs of all our residents with environmental leadership in the protection of our outstanding natural assets to enhance the exceptional lifestyle, rural character, and economic opportunities offered by the Township. Guiding Principles for the Official Plan:
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 3
Page 40 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Goals for the Official Plan:
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 4
Page 41 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
A number of Policy Brochures and Discussion Papers that covered key topics that will need to be considered and incorporated into the New O.P. were also prepared and made available through Engage Frontenac’s virtual platform for public input in the summer of 2021, which were accompanied by four virtual Open Houses and an Online Survey.
1.2 Where We’re Going The purpose of this Policy Directions Report is to provide a summary of the feedback received to date on the Policy Brochures and Discussion Papers; and, highlight significant policy areas that will need to be included in the Official Plan, and explored in greater detail as the project team works toward preparing the first Draft of the New Official Plan. The intention of this report is to provide context and to frame the direction for the O.P.’s policies to inform detailed policy writing rather than provide exact policy wording.
1.3 Organization of this Report This report contains recommendations for the development of the New O.P, including specific policy directions and an overall structure. The report is organized into the following sections:
Section 2, which provides a summary of the land needs analysis work completed to inform the future residential, nonresidential, and industrial land needs for the Township to the 2046 planning horizon. Section 3, which provides a summary of public consultation and engagement completed to date, including a summary of the key emerging themes based on input received. Section 4, which provides an infographic detailing the recommended key policies and/or policy directions to be included in the O.P.; and, Section 5, which provides an outline of the expected O.P. structure and sets out the next steps of the O.P. process.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 5
Page 42 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
This report is supplemented by two Appendices. Appendix A contains a matrix of the information used to inform the Section 4 policy direction infographic; and, Appendix B provides a more detailed compilation of public consultation and stakeholder engagement findings.
- Land Needs Analysis 2.1 Population, Housing and Employment Forecast Background As part of the project work plan, an assessment of the Township’s growth potential to the 2046 planning horizon was conducted. A summary of the key findings of this work is provided below:
1
South Frontenac’s permanent population is forecast to grow from 19,100 in 2016 to 23,800 by 2046; an increase of 4,700 persons during this time period. This represents a population growth rate of 0.7% over the 30-year forecast period. Over the 2016 to 2046 forecast period, 78 new housing units are expected to develop annually. This housing forecast is comprised of 90% low-density (singles and semi-detached), 4% medium-density (townhouses) and 6% high-density (apartment) units. Recent development activity within the Township has largely been consistent with the 2016 to 2021 short-term estimates of growth. The Township’s employment base is expected to increase by approximately 1,100 jobs between 2016 and 2046, increasing from 3,300 to 4,400. Employment is forecast to grow a steady rate of 1% annually, with the activity rate moderately increasing from 18% in 2016 to 19% in 2046.1 Of the 1,100 jobs forecast for the Township, 70 will be located on employment lands (industrial-zoned lands).
Activity rate is the ratio of jobs to population. In order for an activity rate to increase, jobs must grow at a faster rate than population.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 6
Page 43 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
2.2 Urban Residential Land Needs, 2046 The Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 (P.P.S.), emphasizes the importance of directing growth within urban and rural settlement areas. Accordingly, this land needs analysis strictly focuses on residential lands located within the Township’s Settlement Areas. While not part of the land needs analysis, it is also important to recognize that the remaining rural areas within South Frontenac will continue to play an important role in accommodating housing growth. A geographic information systems (GIS) based review of vacant residential lands was undertaken for the Township’s Settlement Areas. According to this review, as of June 2021, the Township has a supply of vacant urban residential zoned land within its Settlement Areas of 752 gross hectares (ha) that can accommodate approximately 1,660 units.2 A majority of these sites (over 90%) are located within the areas of Battersea, Inverary and Sunbury. As shown in Figure 1, the Township has an overall urban residential demand of 1,175 units. When comparing the supply potential to the unit demand forecast from 2021 to 2046, the Township has a surplus of 485 urban housing units by 2046. This surplus equates to approximately 124 net hectares of surplus residential land within existing urban settlement areas.
2
Density assumptions based on a review of existing developments within the Township, a best practices assessment of similar municipalities, as well as an assumption that all medium- and high-density dwelling growth, as well as a portion of low-density housing growth in Primary Settlement Areas will be achieved through communal servicing: Primary Settlement Areas, Communal Servicing: Low Density – 15 units / ha, Medium Density – 22 units / ha and High Density – 45 units / ha; Primary and Secondary Settlement Areas, no Communal Servicing: Low Density – 2 units / ha.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 7
Page 44 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Figure 1: Township of South Frontenac Urban Residential Land Needs 2021 – 2046
2.3 Urban Non-Residential Land Needs, 2046 Non-residential lands within the context of this study are understood as lands zoned as ‘Urban Industrial’ in the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-Law. While these lands primarily contain industrial operations, there are instances where employment supportive commercial uses can also function on industrial lands. Based on a GIS review of the Township’s inventory of lands zoned as “Urban Industrial,” less than one hectare of industrial land remains vacant across the Township’s Settlement Areas. The remaining industrial zoned lands are occupied. Over the 2021 to 2046 forecast period, the Township is anticipated to accommodate approximately 70 additional jobs on industrial-zoned lands. Based on a review of the Township’s developed industrial-zoned lands as well as consideration of average employment land densities for comparable municipalities across southern Ontario, a density assumption of approximately 4 jobs per developable hectare has been assumed in assessing the Township’s long-term industrial land
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 8
Page 45 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
needs. Accounting for potential non-developable features and adjustments for internal infrastructure, the Township has a demand for 19.2 developable hectares of industrial lands to accommodate this type of forecast employment growth between 2021 and 2046. As shown in Figure 2, accounting for this demand and the existing vacant supple, approximately 18 developable hectares (44 developable acres) of industrial land will be required to accommodate growth to 2051. Figure 2: Township of South Frontenac Employment Land Needs - 2021 to 2051
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 9
Page 46 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
2.4 Additional Industrial Lands A need of 18 gross hectares of additional industrial land will be required in the Township by 2046 to accommodate forecast employment growth. To ensure this forecast demand can be accommodated within South Frontenac, additional land will have to be made available in the Township. The recommended locations for these additional industrial lands will be established in the first draft of the new Township of South Frontenac Official Plan. Evaluation criteria will be established to assess the most suitable locations for new industrial lands within the Township, which will evaluate the following:
Can the proposed sites accommodate the industrial land shortfall of 18 gross hectares? If more than one location for additional industrial lands is established in the Township, how should the lands be strategically located to maximize potential industrial land utilization? Are there any adverse impacts of developing the site area as industrial lands on nearby or adjacent land uses? How much of the site area includes proposed lands are located within the Natural Heritage System or an Environmental Protection Area? What is the impact on the broader Agri-Food Network if developed as industrial? (i.e., is the site currently used for growing crops / is the site in a prime agricultural zoning) Are there constraints on the site area that would negatively impact the feasibility of the development of the site and site configuration? (e.g., topography, specific requirements for site plan approval) Is the proposed area in an area with the highest demand for industrial land growth? Does the site area offer the opportunity to expand existing industrial lands (critical mass)? How well can the site area (or parcel) access a major transportation corridor? Is the site capable of being serviced with communal or alternate forms of servicing? Is there high speed internet available or planned for the site?
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 10
Page 47 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
- Engagement Outcomes Engagement for the new O.P. has been conducted through several channels – in-person Open Houses (Fall 2019), online Open Houses (August 2021), two online surveys (Fall 2019 & Fall 2021), policy brochures (August 2021), direct stakeholder meetings, Aboriginal consultation, and collection of community comments and feedback via email and letters. A summary of the key findings of the feedback received to-date is provided in this section. Initial consultation began in 2019, and findings from the municipality’s engagement can be found on the Engage Frontenac website. A total of 125 participants joined three (3) public meetings, and 129 completed surveys were submitted through the Fall of 2019. These findings were used to direct the creation of policy brochures and establish a baseline for the project start-up in 2021. Throughout the summer of 2021, the Township of South Frontenac and Dillon shared four (4) theme-based policy brochures and two (2) discussion papers3, conducted four (4) Open Houses, an online survey, and gathered public feedback on key Official Plan themes. A total of 97 participants attended the Open Houses, 14 post-Open Houses survey responses were submitted, 65 Engage Frontenac survey responses were collected, an engagement meeting with the Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee was held, and 51 emails, letters and other public feedback documents were collected.
3
Policy Brochure themes included housing, economic development, lake ecosystems and agriculture, while the Discussion Paper themes included growth management and economic diversification
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 11
Page 48 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
August 2021 Open Houses The Open Houses were held through the month of August, via Zoom webinar. The Open Houses consisted of a structured presentation that covered the key themes set out in the Policy Brochures, which included live polling on potential policy options being considered and concluded with a Question & Answer period. The attendance of each Open House is detailed below: Virtual Open House Date th
August 14 , 2021 August 19th, 2021 August 25th, 2021 August 31st, 2021
of Attendees
12 24 26 35
Several overarching themes emerged during the public engagement sessions, including the need to increase reliability and speed of internet services in the Township; the need to protect and conserve South Frontenac’s economically, culturally and historically valuable natural areas; and, the preference for directing development toward Settlement Areas in order to prevent encroachment upon natural or agricultural areas and to capitalize on the use of shared municipal servicing systems. Ultimately, public feedback indicated support for the creation of the new Official Plan and widely supported greater environmental protections and alternate servicing solutions, such as communal or municipal servicing for residents. More information on public feedback and detailed information on survey and polling responses can be found in Appendix B.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 12
Page 49 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Stakeholder and Community Interest Groups (2020 / 2021) Comments were also received from the following specific stakeholder and community interest groups: Rideau Valley Conservation Authority; Cataraqui Conservation; Frontenac Federation of Agriculture; West Devil Lake Property Owners Group; and, Township of South Frontenac Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee. Generally, the stakeholder groups were in support of the creation of a new Official Plan, with some concerns regarding their specific areas of interest and activity. A brief summary of the feedback received from these groups is provided below. Rideau Valley Conservation Authority requested that additional definitions be added for fish habitat, flood plain for river and stream systems, natural heritage features and areas, site alteration, and wetlands. They also expressed support for preservation of natural heritage, waterfront and shoreline access for recreation, development that does not impede on environmentally important or sensitive areas, and updates to land use schedules to include linkages and biodiversity schedules. Cataraqui Conservation noted that they have reviewed the O.P. from both a natural hazards perspective and a natural heritage and water quality and quantity perspective. They have provided guidance with suggestions to consider adding a climate change objective, support communal servicing options instead of on-site private services, limit new development reliant on new private roads, and generally implement strong policy to protect water features, intake areas, and environmentally sensitive areas. The Frontenac Federation of Agriculture expressed concerns that residential development is infringing on agricultural lands due to minimum distance separation (M.D.S.) and rural severances, that new rural residents are trespassing on
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 13
Page 50 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
agricultural land with all-terrain vehicles, that greater municipal servicing is needed (roads are too narrow and dangerous and internet connectivity is poor), and other concerns around how agriculture can be supported and protected through Township policy. The West Devil Lake Property Owners Group (W.D.L.P.O.G.) represents 85 seasonal, semi-permanent and permanent property owners on West Devil Lake Lane. The W.D.L.P.O.G. expressed support of the vision, goals, and guiding principles of the Official Plan, and supports each of the four key themes addressed by the policy brochures. They are predominantly interested in increased servicing support for the growth of permanent residents in the West Devil Lake Lane area and protecting the lake ecosystems. The Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee held a meeting on September 1, 2021 where the discussion focused on the upcoming Official Plan. The Committee brought up concerns about the amount of short-term rentals in the township; concerns with a shortage in available long-term rentals; concerns with generally increasing housing instability and affordability; and, concerns surrounding waterfront development and the associated servicing and environmental risks. Engagement and Consultation on Aboriginal Rights and Interests: Preliminary outreach to Aboriginal communities, including the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte (M.B.Q.), Algonquins of Ontario (A.O.O.), more specifically Shabot Obaajiwan First Nation, Metis Nation of Ontario, Huron-Wendat Nation and Alderville First Nation has occurred as part of the project work to-date. A Relationship-building approach has been presented to all First Nations communities and the Metis Nation of Ontario. This approach has provided the opportunity for South Frontenac Township staff to connect with interested communities in an introductory sharing environment where communities are invited to share information on their history of land uses and information on their Aboriginal Rights and Interests that need to be considered in the O.P. To date, conversations have taken place with M.B.Q and the support team to the A.O.O, Jp2g Consultants Inc. These discussions have identified a number of Aboriginal Rights and Interests in the following areas:
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 14
Page 51 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Rights: Hunting, Fishing, and Gathering Duty to Consult and Accommodate Cultural Heritage and Archeology Notification Environmental Protection and Conservation Impacts on Water and Waterlife Climate Change Health and Safety of Aboriginal Peoples (MMIW and Child Welfare) Acknowledgement of Traditional Territories and Pre-Contact History Commitments to a Continued Relationship.
In addition to this, A.O.O has identified the following land selections within South Frontenac Township as part of their land claim and should be taken into consideration in the final O.P. Rec 234- Bedford Tract (923 acres) Rec 233 – Bradshaw Road – (222 acres) Rec 237 – Southend of Wolf Lake – (73.1 acres) Rec 221 Devil Lake – (221 acres) The outreach and consultation with Aboriginal communities is ongoing, with the intent to provide policy language in the new O.P. that addresses Aboriginal rights and interests and to build a path towards reconciliation with efforts to establish long-lasting relationships that will aim to co-plan and co-steward the traditional territories of the Algonquins, Anishnaabe, Haudenosaunee and Huron-Wendat. Collectively, the information from these public engagement sessions, surveys, and meetings were used to inform policy direction recommendations.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 15
Page 52 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
- Policy Recommendations The policy direction infographic (Figure 4-1) provides the top recommended key policies/policy directions for each theme for inclusion in the New O.P. and was developed based on a combination of the following:
A policy audit of the existing Official Plan against the Provincial Policy Statement (P.P.S.) and the Frontenac County Official Plan;
A cursory review of the existing policy framework set out in the 2003 South Frontenac Official Plan;
Background research and analysis conducted by the Project Team; and,
An assessment of public and stakeholder feedback received to date.
The policy recommendations contained within Figure 4-1 are not intended to be exhaustive in nature, but rather represent the primary recommendations for each theme area to be addressed in the New O.P. and are to be used to further inform and guide the development of the O.P. as part of the next phase of work. As noted in Section 3 above, the project team has had initial conversations with some Aboriginal communities; and, this dialogue will be ongoing throughout the project in order to inform and develop policies as part of the O.P. There has been some specific policy language identified for inclusion by A.O.O. and the project team will work to incorporate this policy language into future drafts of the New O.P. In addition to the infographic, a more detailed policy recommendation matrix is included in Appendix A.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 16
Page 53 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Growth Management WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
The Township is expected to grow by 4,700 people by 2046. Permanent population growth contributes to the overall well-being of a community and is an important indicator of vitality. Identifying permanent population growth projections enables decision makers, municipal staff and members of the community to understand and influence where and how growth will occur. Settlement Area intensification will mean the least amount of stress on municipal infrastructure and can revitalize core areas while creating walkable communities.
Residents agree that development should be directed to towards Settlement Areas. Directing new developments to existing Settlement Areas makes the provision of servicing and facilities more efficient. Settlement Areas should support an increase in mixed-use development to provide products and services locally to residents.
The Township is expected to accommodate an additional 70 jobs on employment lands by 2046, which will require the addition of 18 gross hectares of employment land to be designated in order to meet demand.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOCUSED GROWTH: The majority of growth should be directed to Settlement Areas. The population target to be included in the O.P. for long-term planning purposes is: 23,800 persons. The target to be included in the O.P for employment growth is: 1,100 jobs. Of those jobs, 70 are forecasted to be located on employment lands. The remaining jobs are forecast to occur outside of employment lands as jobs that are commercial/institutional, work-at-home and no fixed place of work.
BROADER MARKET CHOICE ON SOUTH FRONTENAC EMPLOYMENT LANDS: The Township will maintain a minimum of five years supply of employment lands at all times, with a range of parcel configuration, zoning, and location to accommodate a variety of employment types.
SETTLEMENT AREAS: The Township supports directing medium and higher-density and large-scale residential development to Settlement Areas (i.e. Sydenham, Inverary, Verona, Battersea, Harrowsmith, Hartington, and Sunbury) in order to capitalize on the use of municipal and communal servicing systems.
CLUSTERING OF INDUSTRIAL USES: The Township supports the clustering of light industrial uses in order to capitalize on investments in new infrastructure and servicing.
Support communal servicing and other servicing options to facilitate a wider-range of housing options to meet the need of all residents in the Township. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: FUTURE EMPLOYMENT LANDS DEVELOPMENT:
Page 17
Page 54 of 264
There is a need to designate employment lands in the new O.P. The new O.P. will identify the recommended area for the expansion of developable employment lands to accommodate projected employment growth.
Large scale development shall consider storm water management, environmental impact and compatibility with surrounding uses. Low-impact development approaches to storm water management that encourages re-absorption of surface water into the ground will be encouraged. Environmental remediation of brownfield sites will also be encouraged.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Housing WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
Age-friendly housing options and age-friendly community design will be needed increasingly as the population ages.
Some residents do not like the inclusion of AirBnB-style rental homes in their communities as they operate more as a commercial uses than a residential use, resulting in compatibility concerns.
Less than 10% of Township of South Frontenac’s current housing stock is represented by renter-occupied housing.
Some residents own and/or run AirBnB-style rentals and would like them to continue to be permitted. Some of the residents in this category support a Township registry in order to maintain a log of the number and type of short-term rental units.
The Township is expected to grow by 730 seasonal residents by 2046. The needs and requirements of seasonal population are often different from the permanent population in regard to public services, infrastructure, housing and employment. In addition, new opportunities for remote work are being widely adopted, and this may have an impact on the traditional role of seasonal residences within South Frontenac. Seasonal dwellings (i.e. cottages, AirBnB’s, vacation homes) are expected to grow in demand as the population of the region continues to grow.
Tiny homes should be considered as housing options to meet the needs of age-friendly communities, affordable housing, and provide accommodation for workers. Affordable housing is needed in the Township, particularly housing options to address the aging population. Some areas with a significant amount of short term rentals are also areas that experience a shortage in available long-term rentals. This would not be ideal in South Frontenac, where the availability of housing is already a concern.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
A RANGE OF HOUSING OPTIONS: The Township should provide opportunities for the development of accessible housing and other housing options to meet a range of affordability and lifecycle needs beyond the traditional single-detached dwelling (e.g. tiny homes, boarding houses, congregate living facilities, townhomes, apartment buildings. accessory residential units) by ensuring a flexible and permissive policy framework is in place.
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY: The Township supports opportunities for the development of housing that is affordable for low and moderate income households and is committed to continued progress toward contributing to the achievement of the County’s overall target of 35% of all new housing units to be affordable to households with low and moderate incomes. A maximum of two Additional Dwelling Units (A.D.U.s) may be permitted in single-detached, semi-detached and townhouse dwellings, and an A.D.U. in an ancillary building or structure, where it can be demonstrated the A.D.U.s can be adequately serviced with private or communal servicing and can meet additional criteria to be determined.
The Township will determine suitable areas for short-term rentals, and establish a framework to regulate short-term rentals.
Page 18
Page 55 of 264
SHORT-TERM RENTALS:
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Economic Development and Employment WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
The conversion of employment lands to non-employment uses can negatively impact the local economy by reducing an already limited supply of developable employment lands, fragmenting the existing employment land supply and limiting the Township’s ability to accommodate export-based job opportunities. In very specific cases, the conversion of employment lands to non-employment uses may be justified from a land-use planning and economic perspective.
Having fast, reliable internet is needed for residents to be able to work from home.
Within South Frontenac, work at home jobs account for 80% of the total employment. Home occupations and industries are growing as more residents switch to work-from-home and surrender their formal commercial spaces. Encouraging home occupations and industries diversifies the local economy.
Separation from schools, parks and community facilities and odour are the factors most important to regulate in regards to cannabis production and processing.
Residents who operate their own businesses are concerned that servicing (particularly internet) is not reliable or strong enough to support their local businesses. Large commercial storefronts should be directed towards Settlement Areas.
The Township will need economic diversity to meet the needs of current and future businesses in the area. This requires land to be set aside for commercial and industrial uses and flexibility within permitted land uses to adapt quickly to changing economic needs. With legalization and an increased interest in local cannabis production, the Township needs to determine suitable locations for production, testing and retailing.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
EMPLOYMENT LANDS: The new O.P. will contain criteria to evaluate conversion of employment lands to other land uses, using site-specific factors such as location, site size, configuration, marketability, and future expansion potential.
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: Larger business (industrial and commercial) should be located in Settlement Areas and be clustered.
CANNABIS:
Page 19
Page 56 of 264
Cannabis production and testing facilities will be required to demonstrate compliance with Federal regulations for operation and will be permitted in agricultural, rural and industrial areas, where compatible and where it has been demonstrated through appropriate studies that servicing of such a facility (e.g. water supply and sewage treatment) shall not have an adverse effect on existing uses in the surrounding area. Cannabis production and testing facilities shall be subject to Site Plan Control. Specific regulations respecting separation distances for sensitive uses will be implemented through the Zoning By-law.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Lake Ecosystems WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
The Township of South Frontenac is split between three Source Water Protection Areas (S.P.A.), Cataraqui S.P.A., Quinte S.P.A. and the Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Region. Most of the Township is considered a highly vulnerable aquifer or significant groundwater recharge area. Sydenham’s municipal water supply is Sydenham Lake. It must be protected from incompatible development described in the Cataraqui Source Protection Plan. Development on waterfronts can negatively affect shoreline health, but limitations on waterfront developments can mitigate negative impacts and preserve natural features for community members, seasonal residents, visitors, and wildlife.
Some residents who have property on lakes are concerned about development restrictions prohibiting them from renovating or expanding their residences. Concerns regarding waterfront development were expressed frequently by residents. Having environmental protection policies such as setbacks or minimum lot size criteria were suggested as solutions. Interest in ensuring shoreline protection whether or not there is a structure or dwelling present on the property.
Water quality is important for the continued use and enjoyment of lakes and rivers.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT: Developments proposed within 30 metres of the high water mark of waterbodies and natural heritage features may require Environmental Impact Assessments and vegetative planting plans to support the enhancement of the vegetative buffer between areas of development and the shoreline. Such studies will be peer reviewed and recommendations will be incorporated through conditions of development. Developments on vacant waterfront lots are expected to comply with setbacks and lot coverage provisions established through the planning process. The Township recognizes that many waterfront lots have structures that are non-complying or non-conforming to the new O.P. The Township will develop policies to address how legal non-complying and conforming waterfront structures may be renovated, repaired, replaced, or expanded under Section 45 of the Planning Act. Township Council will consider the implementation of a Community Planning Permit System (C.P.P.S.) as a planning tool for development in waterfront areas to enhance waterfront protection and streamline the development approvals process.
SHORELINE HEALTH: Council supports the creation of a shoreline protection by-law that regulates tree cutting, vegetation removal, and site alteration adjacent to lakes and other waterbodies.
Council recognizes the cultural significance of waterbodies to Aboriginal communities and will work with Aboriginal groups to catalogue and conserve archaeologically significant artefacts and sites. Page 20
Page 57 of 264
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Rural WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
Rural areas of the Township have highest concentration of area’s natural features. Rural areas fall within the Frontenac Arch U.N.E.S.C.O. world biosphere that is internationally recognized for its ecological biodiversity. Focusing growth and development within the rural designation to areas away from natural heritage features will help to conserve biodiversity of the Frontenac Arch Biosphere and will provide other benefits to Township residents including maintaining water quality and quantity and the rural character of the Township. Conservation uses are encouraged on rural lands such as re-forestation and nature appreciation through trails and public, non-for-profit and private conservation areas. In South Frontenac, these lands include Frontenac Park, Gould Lake, Elbow Lake, K&P Trail, Cataraqui Trail, and the many land holdings and trails owned by groups such as Queen’s University, Nature Conservancy Canada, Land Conservancy KFLA, partner Conservation Authorities and many others.
Residents express support for conservation uses within rural areas of the Township. The rural character of the township is valued by residents and should be preserved and protected as development continues. Home-based occupations and industries should be supported in rural areas. Greater servicing is needed in rural residential areas to support home-based occupations and industries. Development in rural areas should match the existing character of the area.
Rural residential uses accommodate primarily single-detached dwellings on individual lots through primarily creation of individual lots through consents or estate residential plans of subdivisions/plans of condominium. A limited portion of the Township’s growth should be accommodated through creation of new rural residential lots.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
RURAL ECONOMY: RURAL LOT SEVERANCES: It is the Township’s intention that new lot development in Rural Areas will generally occur by plan of subdivision. However, a maximum of three (3) severances may be permitted from a lot of record existing on the day of adoption of the 2000 Plan by Council where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision. The severance limit may be waived to allow limited rural residential development by way infilling within existing concentrations of residential development in the Rural designation. For the purposes of this policy, infilling in the Rural designation shall refer to situations where the land under consideration is an existing lot, fronts upon a public road and is located between existing residential buildings or an existing residential building and a natural or human-made barrier such as a public road, or a navigable stream, separated by not more than approximately 100 metres and located on the same side of the road.
Lot creation policies shall be established for rural employment uses including rural commercial, industrial and recreational uses.
Policies for establishing new rural recreational and tourism uses, including tourist accommodation will be established in the Official Plan. Agricultural uses shall also be permitted in rural areas of the Township. RURAL CHARACTER: Council supports the preservation of the Township’s rural character. The Official Plan will define the natural environment, historic properties, traditional rural lifestyles, and visual landscapes unique to South Frontenac and will ensure visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding area. RURAL SERVICING: The Township recognizes that developments in rural areas will need to have lots of sufficient size to support private servicing. The current standard of 0.8 hectare lots will be maintained for single detached dwellings. Page 21
Page 58 of 264
Lots created in the Rural designation must demonstrate they can be adequately serviced without negative impact to environmental and human health.
Policies that support home based businesses such as home industries and occupations, along with small scale rural commercial and industrial uses will be included in the Official Plan.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Infrastructure WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
While this was not a section addressed in a Policy Brochure or discussion paper, best practices suggest that new infrastructure should be developed with a goal of environmental and economic sustainability.
Residents are strongly in support of increased internet service, in both location and speed. Many wrote in with concerns regarding the internet service reliability.
High-speed, reliable internet is lacking throughout the Township of South Frontenac. The standard road width requirements may not be adequate for the movement of agricultural equipment. As non-agricultural traffic increases, it can be difficult for agricultural equipment to travel roadways.
Rural roads are facing challenges with an increase in the number of residential vehicles and agricultural industrial vehicles. Some feel as though the roads are too narrow, with no shoulder, and present hazards to users. Some residents have expressed support for age-friendly community initiatives that include walkable communities and integrated transit systems (either stop-based or on-demand).
Communal servicing can enable more land-efficient development than private servicing, and should be used wherever possible.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS RURAL TRANSPORTATION: Council encourages the development of transit-supportive communities in order to increase the future potential of efficient rural transit in the Frontenacs. This includes the creation of active transportation connections within and between Settlement Areas and the clustering of transit-supportive uses such as schools, businesses, social services, and health facilities within Settlement Areas. PRIVATE LANES: V AT
E
RI
P
Council shall encourage waterfront development to be directed towards areas where there is adequate capacity for additional traffic on existing private lanes or towards areas where private lanes may be added. The Official Plan will incorporate policies from the County of Frontenac Private Lane study (2016) to establish private lane standards and extensions to private lanes. INTERNET SERVICES: Council recognizes the importance of internet connectivity to support growth and development of the community. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: Where possible, natural vegetation and trees should be preserved during and after development. Low impact development and green infrastructure are encouraged approaches to address stormwater management.
Council shall encourage communal servicing, where feasible. Council shall encourage development be directed towards areas where communal servicing will support residential, industrial, and commercial development. Page 22
Page 59 of 264
COMMUNAL SERVICING:
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
The Public Realm WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
While this was not a section addressed in a Policy Brochure or discussion paper, best practices suggest that new development be integrated with active transportation systems.
Farmers would like to see Council support for recreational trails that would direct ATV users away from trespassing on their properties.
The Township values its natural areas such as parks and open spaces, and policy should strive to protect, preserve, and enhance these areas.
Waterfront public access should be maintained and/or expanded in the Township.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
WATERFRONT ACCESS: The Township will continue to maintain public access to waterfronts and provide opportunities for public recreation.
PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT: Development in Settlement Areas should be pedestrian-oriented and connected to a network of active transportation options.
Large-scale development (i.e. subdivisions) shall provide dedicated communal green space for the benefit and use of residents and visitors.
Page 23
Page 60 of 264
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE:
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Division of Land WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
Land severances may be needed to meet housing growth targets until other servicing options are available to support higher-density growth within settlement areas. Rural area are expected to support growth over the next 25 years. Establishing alternate servicing options will assist in directing growth into settlement areas and to provide a greater variety of housing types. Focus additional dwelling units (A.D.U.s) in rural residential areas where lot sizes and private water and sewage servicing can accommodate them and can be accessed by a public road.
Some residents are against re-setting the clock on new severances. Other residents would like new severances to be permitted. It is generally supported that new large-scale developments occur through plans of subdivision and in Settlement Areas. Rural areas are lacking necessary services for residents, such as reliable internet and road capacity.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS NEW LOT CREATION: Council supports new lot creation through Plans of Subdivision and Condominiums. Projects that require private servicing should be of adequate size to provide for proper installation of services, and should not encroach upon prime agricultural lands.
SETTLEMENT AREA LOT SEVERANCES: It is the Township’s intention that new lot development in Settlement Areas will generally occur by plan of subdivision. However, severances may be considered for the purposes of infilling and minor rounding out, where the following criteria are met: Hydrogeological and terrain conditions support development; The development can be supported by communal servicing where available; and, The development will front on public road of adequate standard. Where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision.
Please refer to the Rural infographic page for recommended severance policies that would apply to rural areas. Page 24
Page 61 of 264
RURAL AREA LOT SEVERANCES:
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Agricultural WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
South Frontenac has many agricultural resources that face impacts from development pressure. The agriculture and agri-food system can include several industries such as farm input and service supplier industries, primary agriculture, food and beverage processing, food distribution, retail, wholesale and food service industries. The Township is subject to Minimum Distance Standards (M.D.S.), requiring buffers between agricultural uses and residential areas. As residential areas grow and expand, they limit the agricultural potential of nearby areas. Creating opportunities for farmers to add more value to what they produce (e.g., by allowing them to turn the wheat that they produce into baked goods that they could sell at a higher value) can increase the economic potential for agricultural businesses. These diversified agricultural uses can create new jobs, increase tourism, and encourage economic sustainability.
South Frontenac’s agriculture holds much of the area’s economic and cultural value. This should be recognized and protected from encroachment by development. Prime Agricultural Areas with livestock are at risk due to M.D.S. requirements and expanding development patterns. Include policies supporting the growth of infrastructure (e.g. roads) and services (e.g. electric) that support the productivity of working farms. Encourage practices that are compatible with the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals and the climate action plan. Residents support the inclusion of policy supporting value-added agricultural practices on farms.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
PRIME AGRICULTURAL AREAS: Council supports the protection of prime agricultural areas and recognizes the economic, cultural, and historic value farms add to the Township. Non-farm development in the vicinity of prime agricultural lands and other agriculturally productive lands will be discouraged unless they will not encroach on agricultural lands following the Minimum Distance Separation formulae.
VALUE-ADDED AGRICULTURE: The Township supports the creation of uses that highlight the importance and value of farming. On this basis, uses such as farm tours, cafes, processing operations such as flour refinement, pickling, canning, or baking, and shops for the sale of site-produced goods shall be permitted within the agricultural designated areas.
AGRICULTURE-RELATED INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES ON AGRICULTURAL LANDS:
Agricultural uses will also be permitted in rural areas of the Township. Page 25
Page 62 of 264
Council recognizes that the agriculture and agri-food system can include several industries such as farm input and service supplier industries, primary agriculture, food and beverage processing, food distribution, retail, wholesale and food service industries.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Environmental Protection WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard areas require special development considerations. Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard areas are classified under Environmental Protection Area boundaries. These areas should be monitored closely and have limitations on the type and size of development permitted within them. Waterfront areas and shorelines are particularly vulnerable and will require greater protections from future development. South Frontenac is within the Frontenac Arch U.N.E.S.C.O. world biosphere which is recognized for its ecological significant and biodiversity.
Some residents are concerned about the threats posed by climate change to the ecology and rare environmental features found in South Frontenac. Residents have expressed support for the conservation of natural lands that are at risk of development. South Frontenac is home to areas of great ecological value. These areas and networks should be protected. Council and the Township should work with conservation authorities to identify, catalogue, and develop strategies for ecological preservation.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECTING PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY: Development should generally be directed away from natural and human-made hazards areas. Where required, studies and measures to address or mitigate known or suspected hazards must be completed prior to development.
CONSERVATION: Council supports the conservation of our unique and valuable natural heritage areas, and will work closely with conservation authorities, not-for-profit agencies, land trusts, Nature Conservancy Canada and Aboriginal groups to actively protect these areas.
CLIMATE CHANGE: ECOLOGICAL PRESERVATION: Council will work with the County, Provincial ministries, regional conservation authorities and organizations to identify gaps in ecological protection policies and environmentally sensitive areas.
NATURAL HERITAGE: The County will undertake a Natural Heritage Study update in 2022, to update existing natural heritage mapping and take a systems approach to natural heritage protection. Council supports the consideration and adoption of an O.P. amendment that will incorporate the recommendations of the County Natural Heritage Study. Page 26
Page 63 of 264
A range of opportunities to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change should be addressed: Focusing growth within established Settlement Areas and promoting compact, complete mixed use communities; Promotion of green infrastructure, such as grassy swales and rain gardens to promote infiltration; roadside curb cuts to direct runoff to grassy swales and rain gardens permeable pavement and green roofs to reduce runoff; rock pits, catch basins, and detention ponds to reduce peak runoff flows; and water and energy conserving infrastructure; Promotion of energy efficient building design; Protecting the agricultural land bases; Protecting and restoring natural areas and water systems, as well as protecting shorelines and increasing tree canopy cover; and, Promoting active transportation networks.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Resource Extraction WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
While this was not an area of focus for policy brochures or discussion papers, best practices suggest that resource extraction areas be protected from development or encroachment by non-compatible land uses.
Council should support the protection of areas with resources such as mining lands, mineral aggregate lands, and forestry lands.
Best practices also suggest that former resource extraction land be remediated before land is used for other purposes.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
RESOURCES: Existing licensed pits and quarries will be recognized in the extractive resource designation and will be protected from incompatible uses. Development should be avoided in areas of known deposits of mineral aggregate resources or adjacent lands, which would preclude or hinder the establishment of new operations or access to the resources. Development shall only permitted if resource use would not be feasible; or the proposed lands use or development serves a greater public-interest; and issues of public health public safety and environment have been addressed. Activities that contribute to mineral aggregate resource conservation (e.g. aggregate recycling facility) shall be considered as an accessory use within aggregate operations.
REHABILITATION: In areas where land was formerly used for resource extraction, remediation rehabilitation must be complete before land may be used for other purposes. Comprehensive rehabilitation planning is encouraged where there is a concentration of mineral aggregate operations. Page 64 of 264
Page 27
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Cultural Heritage WHAT WE FOUND
WHAT WE HEARD
Best planning practices support the continued engagement and partnership with Aboriginal Peoples. Cultural heritage lands and artefacts should be noted and a database or list developed. While this was not an area of focus in the policy brochures, through our policy audit, there was a gap identified in the existing O.P. regarding Aboriginal consultation policies.
Members of the public inquired about the level of engagement conducted to date with Aboriginal communities. Interest from participants to ensure that Aboriginal communities were engaged and involved.
While this was not an area of focus in the policy brochures, through our policy audit, there was a gap identified in the existing O.P. regarding archaeological assessments. South Frontenac is the home of the U.N.E.S.C.O. World Heritage site of the Rideau Canal.
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ABORIGINAL CONSULTATION: Aboriginal communities will be consulted when development on culturally significant lands is planned or where archaeological assessments are required. CULTURAL HERITAGE: Council may develop a Municipal register of cultural heritage and archaeological resources or assist other organizations and work with the Ministry of Culture in developing, sharing and maintaining an inventory. Development adjacent to designated heritage property shall not detract from the overall heritage character of the area. Council will encourage the development of public and private financial support for the conservation of designated heritage property. Council shall require a heritage permit before erection, demolition, alteration or removal of any building or structure or alteration of external portion of a designated heritage property. Council will establish policies to recognize and protect the cultural heritage of the Rideau Canal waterway within South Frontenac.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: Council shall require that in any proposed development and prior to the undertaking of any public work, private development, planning application, consideration be given to the possible effects and impacts of such works or development on cultural heritage and archaeological resources and those impacts, where identified, are appropriately mitigated.
Council will work collaboratively with the County to undertake an archaeological master plan to establish a framework for undertaking archaeological assessments across the Township. Page 28
Page 65 of 264
Council shall require an archaeological impact assessment carried out by an archeologist licensed under the Ontario Heritage Act, when any public work, private development, planning application will affect an area containing a known archaeological site or adjacent to a cemetery or an area considered to have archaeological potential or is within 250 metres (820 feet) of a Provincially registered or known archeological site or cultural heritage feature.
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
- Proposed Structure for the New Official Plan 5.1 Official Plan Structure The new Official Plan should be structured based on the following Key Chapters:
Welcome to the Future of South Frontenac o Purpose of the Official Plan o Our Vision & Goals for South Frontenac o What we Value o Building Partnerships with Aboriginal Communities o Guidance for the Township - How to Read this Plan Growth and Prosperity o How we will Grow o Where we Live o Where we Work o Where we Play o How we will Develop our Infrastructure How we will use the Land o Urban Lands o Agricultural Lands o Rural Lands o Lakes and Shore Lands (or Waterfront) o Sustainability and the Environment o Resource Extraction o Our Cultural and Natural Heritage How we will Engage and Consult
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 29
Page 66 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
How the Official Plan Works
5.2 Next Steps Following the presentation of this Policy Directions Report to Council, and endorsement of the policy directions contained in this report, the Project Team will begin to develop the first draft of the Official Plan. Once the draft Official Plan has been completed, it will be shared with Council, stakeholders, community interest groups, Aboriginal Peoples, and the general public for feedback. The revised Official Plan will be presented at a statutory meeting for final comments and will be followed by presentation to Council for adoption. It will then make its way to the County of Frontenac for approval, at which time the Official Plan will come into effect.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 30
Page 67 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Page 68 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix A – Policy Recommendation Matrix
South Frontenac 2040 Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 31
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Figure 4-1: Policy Directions Infographic Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
Growth Management
Designate Settlement Areas and determine their boundaries.
Focused Growth:
Encourage efficient development patterns and road connections in Settlement Areas to optimize public services and to make the most efficient use of land and resources.
Improve accessibility for all people, including the elderly and those with disabilities, by addressing land use barriers that restrict their full participation in society. Accommodate an appropriate affordable and market-based range and mix of residential types (including single-detached, additional residential units, multi-unit housing, affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet longterm needs.
Direct growth to existing Settlement Areas and designated growth areas. Support density, intensification, and redevelopment.
Where feasible, promote mixed use development in Settlement Areas including residential, commercial, institutional, parks, and employment areas. Settlement Area boundary expansions shall be determined by the Local Official Plans and shall require an Official Plan Amendment to the Local Plan. As none of the Settlement Areas in the Frontenacs have full municipal services, a Settlement Area capability study (comprehensive review) is required by this Plan for any boundary expansion. New residential development should not be located on lands which would involve major public expense in opening up or maintaining access routes, providing drainage, or providing other public services and facilities, unless major public services, access, and/or facilities are provided at the developer’s expense. Storm water management plans may be required for any new development consisting of more than four lots or for commercial or industrial developments with large areas of impervious surface
The Township is expected to grow by 4,700 people by 2046. Permanent population growth contributes to the overall well-being of a community and is an important indicator of vitality. Identifying permanent population growth projections enables decision makers, municipal staff and members of the community to understand and influence where and how growth will occur.
Residents agree that development should be directed to towards Settlement Areas. Waterfront development should be permitted, with restrictions to size and location on the lot, but grandfathered lots must be allowed to develop as per permissions.
Population growth in the area will be largely driven by migration from other parts of Ontario and lesser by migration from other provinces or internationally.
Directing new developments to existing Settlement Areas makes the provision of servicing and facilities more efficient.
Rural development is expected to continue to account for a substantial portion of growth that will occur in the Township over the next 25 years.
Settlement Areas should support an increase in mixed-use development to provide products and services locally to residents.
Residents are generally supportive of secondary suites as a method of residential intensification in rural and settlement areas.
Settlement Area intensification will mean the least amount of stress on municipal infrastructure and can revitalize core areas while creating walkable communities.
The Township is expected to accommodate an additional 70 jobs on employment lands by 2046, which will require the addition of 18 gross hectares of employment land to be designated in order to meet demand.
Clustering light industrial uses means that investment in new infrastructure and servicing (e.g. water, sewage, electricity, and internet) is focused in the Township.
The majority of growth should be directed to Settlement Areas.
The population target to be included in the O.P. for longterm planning purposes is: 23,800 persons.
The target to be included in the O.P for employment growth is: 1,100 jobs. Of those jobs, 70 are forecasted to be located on employment lands. The remaining jobs are forecast to occur outside of employment lands as jobs that are commercial/institutional, workat-home and no fixed place of work.
Settlement Areas:
The Township supports directing medium and higherdensity and large-scale residential development to Settlement Areas (i.e. Sydenham, Inverary, Verona, Battersea, Harrowsmith, Hartington, and Sunbury) in order to capitalize on the use of municipal and communal servicing systems.
Support communal servicing and other servicing options to facilitate a wider-range of housing options to meet the
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 32
Page 69 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
(e.g., asphalt parking and loading areas).
When reviewing any such development proposals, the approval authorities will encourage the retention of existing tree cover or natural vegetation and the provision of significant grassed and natural areas shall be encouraged to facilitate absorption of surface water into the ground. To support long-term planning for potential municipal services in villages, planning shall facilitate the preparation, implementation and monitoring of the Source Water Protection Plans. Investigate ways to minimize and control the removal of vegetation for buildings, site alteration or accessory activities such as landscaping.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
Ribbon development should be avoided in order to prevent decentralization and sprawl of commercial and industrial uses. The Township will need to have a stock of employment lands available for future development.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
need of all residents in the Township. Future Employment Lands Development:
As the Township is expected to see population growth, residential development must be planned for and an increase in the number and types of housing units permitted.
There is a need to designate employment lands in the new O.P. The new O.P. will identify the recommended area for the expansion of developable employment lands to accommodate projected employment growth.
Broader Market Choice on South Frontenac Employment Lands:
The Township will maintain a minimum of five years supply of employment lands at all times, with a range of parcel configuration, zoning, and location to accommodate a variety of employment types.
Clustering of Industrial Uses:
The Township supports the clustering of light industrial uses in order to capitalize on investments in new infrastructure and servicing.
Environmental Impact:
Large scale development shall consider storm water management, environmental impact and compatibility with surrounding uses. Low-impact development approaches to storm water management that
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 33
Page 70 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
encourages re-absorption of surface water into the ground will be encouraged. Environmental remediation of brownfield sites will also be encouraged. Housing
Encouraged to permit and facilitate a range of housing options, including single-detached, additional residential units, multi-unit housing, affordable housing and housing for older persons, to meet projected market-based and affordable housing needs of current and future residents of the regional market area.
Maintain at all times the ability to accommodate residential growth for a minimum of 15 years.
Maintain at all times where new development is to occur, land with servicing capacity sufficient to provide at least a three-year supply of residential units
Meet projected market-based and affordable housing needs of current and future residents Establish and implement minimum targets for the provision of housing which is affordable to low and moderate income households and which aligns with applicable housing and homelessness plans. Direct the development of new housing towards locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or
South Frontenac is allocated 70% of the projected growth of permanent population in the County because of the employment opportunities available in the city.
The lack of full municipal water and wastewater services in any of the hamlets or villages of the County will constrain the ability to increase the density of these areas, and may impact the ability to focus new development within these Settlement Areas. Demonstration of limited rural residential development in Township Official Plans may include such measures as limits to the number of lots granted through consent and plans of subdivision. County Council will establish and monitor an affordable housing target of 35% for low and moderate income households in the Frontenacs, with a focus on methods of providing housing for the low-income residents of the County. Housing options for seniors that wish to remain in their communities will need to be provided, and seniors are migrating to the county to settle in their cottages full-time.
Age-friendly housing options and agefriendly community design will be needed increasingly as the population ages. Less than 10% of Township of South Frontenac’s current housing stock is represented by renter-occupied housing. High-density built form types typically provide more affordable alternatives to traditional single-detached dwellings and other ground-oriented development forms and can also add to the rental stock. However, these are challenging to develop in the Township. Work-from-home measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have increased the percentage of the population that lives and works in the South Frontenac area, and as such the percentage of the population looking to expand the square footage of their home. The Township is expected to grow by 730 seasonal residents by 2046. The needs and requirements of seasonal population are often different from the permanent population in regard to public services, infrastructure, housing and employment. In addition, new opportunities for remote work are being widely adopted, and this may have an impact on the traditional role of
There is a need for more rental housing.
Accessible housing and seniors housing options are limited and require more options in the Township.
Some residents do not like the inclusion of AirBnB-style rental homes in their communities as they operate more as a commercial uses than a residential use, resulting in compatibility concerns.
Some residents own and/or run AirBnB-style rentals and would like them to continue to be permitted. Some of the residents in this category support a Township registry in order to maintain a log of the number and type of short-term rental units.
Tiny homes should be considered as housing options to meet the needs of age-friendly communities, affordable housing, and provide accommodation for workers.
Affordable housing is needed in the Township, particularly housing options to address the aging population.
A Range of Housing Options:
The Township should provide opportunities for the development of accessible housing and other housing options to meet a range of affordability and lifecycle needs beyond the traditional singledetached dwelling (e.g. tiny homes, boarding houses, congregate living facilities, townhomes, apartment buildings. accessory residential units) by ensuring a flexible and permissive policy framework is in place.
Housing Affordability
The Township supports opportunities for the development of housing that is affordable for low and moderate income households and is committed to continued progress toward contributing to the achievement of the County’s overall target of 35% of all new housing units to be affordable to households with low and moderate incomes
A maximum of two Additional Dwelling Units (A.D.U.s) may be permitted in single-detached,
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 34
Page 71 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
will be available to support current and projected needs.
seasonal residences within South Frontenac.
Seasonal residences offered as shortterm rentals have been found to have a limiting impact on local housing supply.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
A concern that short-term rentals may be driving up the cost of housing for long-term residents.
Some areas with a significant amount of short term rentals are also areas that experience a shortage in available long-term rentals. This would not be ideal in South Frontenac, where the availability of housing is already a concern.
Seasonal dwellings (i.e. cottages, AirBnB’s, vacation homes) are expected to grow in demand as the population of the region continues to grow.
Policy Recommendations
semi-detached and townhouse dwellings, and an A.D.U. in an ancillary building or structure, where it can be demonstrated the A.D.U.s can be adequately serviced with private or communal servicing and can meet additional criteria to be determined. Short-Term Rentals:
Economic Development and Employment
Provide an appropriate mix and range of employment uses. Identify strategic sites for investment, monitor the availability and suitability of employment sites, and address potential barriers to investment. Protect and preserve employment areas, especially those in proximity to major goods movement facilities and corridors, for current and future uses, and ensure that the necessary infrastructure is provided to support current and projected needs.
Protect major goods movement facilities and corridors for employment uses that require those locations.
Ensure that there is a well-balanced and varied commercial economy to serve the needs of the residents. Supporting a regional road system, trail development, and ideas for pedestrian movement and rural transit – all of these issues are essential to strengthening both communities and the strength of the economy.
A prime component of the County’s economy is the extensive area of lands that are used for farming, both in prime agricultural and rural areas. Council shall consider the incorporation of “good forestry practices” along with the impact of the development on the ability to provide a continuous, sustainable forestry industry in the County.
Encourage compact, mixed use development that incorporates compatible employment uses to
While maintaining an adequate overall supply of employment lands is important to accommodate forecast employment demand, it is also critical that the Township can offer a wide range of vacant employment land parcels by configuration and size. The conversion of employment lands to non-employment uses can negatively impact the local economy by reducing an already limited supply of developable employment lands, fragmenting the existing employment land supply and limiting the Township’s ability to accommodate export-based job opportunities. In very specific cases, the conversion of employment lands to non-employment uses may be justified from a land-use planning and economic perspective. Within South Frontenac, work at home jobs account for 80% of the total employment. Home occupations and
Having fast, reliable internet is needed for residents to be able to work from home.
Residents who operate their own businesses are concerned that servicing (particularly internet) is not reliable or strong enough to support their local businesses.
Large commercial storefronts should be directed towards Settlement Areas.
Cannabis production and processing should be located in industrial areas.
Separation from schools, parks and community facilities and odour are the factors most important to regulate in regards to cannabis production and processing.
The Township will determine suitable areas for short-term rentals, and establish a framework to regulate shortterm rentals.
Employment Lands:
The new O.P. will contain criteria to evaluate conversion of employment lands to other land uses, using site-specific factors such as location, site size, configuration, marketability, and future expansion potential.
Light Industrial:
Larger business (industrial and commercial) should be located in Settlement Areas and be clustered.
Cannabis:
Cannabis production and testing facilities will be required to demonstrate compliance with Federal regulations for operation and will be permitted
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 35
Page 72 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
support liveable and resilient communities.
Lake Ecosystems
Natural features and areas shall be protected for the long term.
The diversity and connectivity of natural features in an area, and the long-term ecological function and biodiversity of natural heritage systems, should be maintained, restored or, where possible, improved, recognizing linkages between and among natural heritage features and areas, surface water features and ground water features.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
industries are growing as more residents switch to work-from-home and surrender their formal commercial spaces. Encouraging home occupations and industries diversifies the local economy.
The goal of the County Official Plan is to improve and protect the waterfront areas in Frontenac County as a significant cultural, recreational, economic, and natural environment resource and to maintain or enhance the quality of the land areas adjacent to the shore.
The Township will need economic diversity to meet the needs of current and future businesses in the area. This requires land to be set aside for commercial and industrial uses and flexibility within permitted land uses to adapt quickly to changing economic needs.
Economic development goals should be balanced against the protection of the environment and agricultural lands.
With legalization and an increased interest in local cannabis production, the Township needs to determine suitable locations for production, testing and retailing.
The Township of South Frontenac is split between three Source Water Protection Areas (S.P.A.), Cataraqui S.P.A., Quinte S.P.A. and the Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Region. Most of the Township is considered a highly vulnerable aquifer or significant groundwater recharge area. Sydenham’s municipal water supply is Sydenham Lake. It must be protected from incompatible development described in the Cataraqui Source Protection Plan.
Waterfront areas should be considered a major recreation resource and should be accessible to both public and private users.
Development on waterfronts can negatively affect shoreline health, but
in agricultural, rural and industrial areas, where compatible and where it has been demonstrated through appropriate studies that servicing of such a facility (e.g. water supply and sewage treatment) shall not have an adverse effect on existing uses in the surrounding area. Cannabis production and testing facilities shall be subject to Site Plan Control. Specific regulations respecting separation distances for sensitive uses will be implemented through the Zoning By-law.
Some residents who have property on lakes are concerned about development restrictions prohibiting them from renovating or expanding their residences.
Residents are generally supportive of the protection of lake ecosystems and support measures to protect and rehabilitate coastlines.
Concerns regarding waterfront development were expressed frequently by residents. Having environmental protection policies
Waterfront Development:
Developments proposed within 30 metres of the high water mark of waterbodies and natural heritage features may require Environmental Impact Assessments and vegetative planting plans to support the enhancement of the vegetative buffer between areas of development and the shoreline. Such studies will be peer reviewed and recommendations
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 36
Page 73 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
limitations on waterfront developments can mitigate negative impacts and preserve natural features for community members, seasonal residents, visitors, and wildlife.
such as setbacks or minimum lot size criteria were suggested as solutions.
Development shall not be permitted in significant wetlands, wildlife habitats, or fish habitats except in accordance with provincial and federal requirements. Maintain linkages and related functions among ground water features, hydrologic functions, natural heritage features and areas, and surface water features including shoreline areas. Protect, improve, or restore the quality and quantity of water by ensuring consideration of environmental lake capacity, where applicable. Plan for efficient and sustainable use of water resources, through practices for water conservation and sustaining water quality.
Water quality is important for the continued use and enjoyment of lakes and rivers.
Interest in ensuring shoreline protection whether or not there is a structure or dwelling present on the property.
There is interest in creating and promoting best management practices for waterfront farming operations. Possibly financial incentives.
Policy Recommendations
will be incorporated through conditions of development.
Developments on vacant waterfront lots are expected to comply with setbacks and lot coverage provisions established through the planning process.
The Township recognizes that many waterfront lots have structures that are noncomplying or non-conforming to the new O.P. The Township will develop policies to address how legal non-complying and conforming waterfront structures may be renovated, repaired, replaced, or expanded under Section 45 of the Planning Act.
Township Council will consider the implementation of a Community Planning Permit System (C.P.P.S.) as a planning tool for development in waterfront areas to enhance waterfront protection and streamline the development approvals process
Residents expressed concerns about backlot development.
Shoreline Health:
Council supports the creation of a shoreline protection by-law that regulates tree cutting, vegetation removal, and site alteration adjacent to lakes and other waterbodies.
Archaeological Significance:
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 37
Page 74 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
Rural
Healthy, integrated and viable Rural Areas should be supported by: o
o
o
o
o
o
o
building upon rural character, and leveraging rural amenities and assets;
promoting regeneration, including the redevelopment of brownfield sites;
accommodating an appropriate range and mix of housing in rural settlement areas; encouraging the conservation and redevelopment of existing rural housing stock on rural lands;
using rural infrastructure and public service facilities efficiently; promoting diversification of the economic base and employment opportunities through goods and services, including value-added products and the sustainable management or use of resources; providing opportunities for sustainable and diversified tourism, including leveraging
Lot creation should take place either through plan of subdivision, plan of condominium, or consent. Rural residential development shall reflect the intent of preserving the rural, open space character of the County. The appearance of such development should be cohesive with the rural landscape. New residential development should not be located on lands which would involve major public expense.
It is recognized that the majority of existing and new rural residential development will be serviced by private wells and septic tanks; however, the County and the Townships may be interested in the investigation of new technologies and communal servicing options where it is deemed feasible for such areas and is supported by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (M.O.E.C.C.).
Subdivisions in rural areas will be subject to criteria considering the suitability of the subdivision with relation to lot size, topography, vegetation and soil and drainage
South Frontenac’s rural areas contain a mix of land uses that support a diversification of the economic base, housing, and employment opportunities. Rural lands are comprised of agricultural uses and agriculturalrelated uses, natural heritage features, as well as natural resources, including mineral aggregates in the form of quarries and sand/gravel pits. Rural areas of the Township have highest concentration of area’s natural features. Rural areas fall within the Frontenac Arch U.N.E.S.C.O. world biosphere that is internationally recognized for its ecological biodiversity. Focusing growth and development within the rural designation to areas away from natural heritage features will help to conserve biodiversity of the Frontenac Arch Biosphere and will provide other benefits to Township residents including maintaining water quality and quantity and the rural character of the Township. Conservation uses are encouraged on rural lands such as re-forestation and nature appreciation through trails and public, non-for-profit and private conservation areas. In South
Residents express support for conservation uses within rural areas of the Township.
The rural character of the township is valued by residents and should be preserved and protected as development continues.
Home-based occupations and industries should be supported in rural areas.
Greater servicing is needed in rural residential areas to support homebased occupations and industries.
Development in rural areas should match the existing character of the area.
Ribbon development in rural areas should be avoided.
Council recognizes the cultural significance of waterbodies to Aboriginal communities and will work with Aboriginal groups to catalogue and conserve archaeologically significant artefacts and sites.
Rural Lot Severances:
It is the Township’s intention that new lot development in Rural Areas will generally occur by plan of subdivision. However, a maximum of three (3) severances may be permitted from a lot of record existing on the day of adoption of the 2000 Plan by Council where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision.
The severance limit may be waived to allow limited rural residential development by way infilling within existing concentrations of residential development in the Rural designation. For the purposes of this policy, infilling in the Rural designation shall refer to situations where the land under consideration is an existing lot, fronts upon a public road and is located between existing residential buildings or an existing residential building and a natural or human-made barrier such as a public road, or
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 38
Page 75 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
historical, cultural, and natural assets; o
o
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
characteristics, servicing requirements, public road access, and rural character.
Frontenac, these lands include Frontenac Park, Gould Lake, Elbow Lake, K&P Trail, Cataraqui Trail, and the many land holdings and trails owned by groups such as Queen’s University, Nature Conservancy Canada, Land Conservancy KFLA, partner Conservation Authorities and many others.
conserving biodiversity and considering the ecological benefits provided by nature; and providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas.
In rural areas, rural settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted.
Rural Commercial and Rural Industrial also support the rural economy. Small scale rural commercial and industrial uses are supported through permitting home industries and home occupations. Larger scale rural commercial uses into areas of the Township where uses can be clustered to meet the needs of the traveling public and visitors to South Frontenac. Rural recreational and tourist accommodation and business opportunities such as marinas and campgrounds/tent and trailer parks, hotels, inns and cottages, along with natural/outdoor recreation opportunities are supported to locate within the rural designation. Rural residential uses accommodate primarily single-detached dwellings on individual lots through primarily creation of individual lots through consents or estate residential plans of subdivisions/plans of condominium. A limited portion of the Township’s growth should be accommodated through creation of new rural residential lots.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
a navigable stream, separated by not more than approximately 100 metres and located on the same side of the road.
Lots created in the Rural designation must demonstrate they can be adequately serviced without negative impact to environmental and human health.
Lot creation policies shall be established for rural employment uses including rural commercial, industrial and recreational uses.
Rural Economy
Policies that support home based businesses such as home industries and occupations, along with small scale rural commercial and industrial uses will be included in the Official Plan.
Policies for establishing new rural recreational and tourism uses, including tourist accommodation will be established in the Official Plan.
Agricultural uses shall also be permitted in rural areas of the Township.
Rural Character:
Council supports the preservation of the Township’s rural character. The Official Plan
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 39
Page 76 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
will define the natural environment, historic properties, traditional rural lifestyles, and visual landscapes unique to South Frontenac and will ensure visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding area. Rural Servicing:
Infrastructure
Maximize the extent and function of vegetative and pervious surfaces. Promote stormwater management best practices, including stormwater attenuation and reuse, water conservation and efficiency, and low impact development.
Encourage adaptive re-use prior to developing new infrastructure and public service facilities. Optimize existing infrastructure and public service facilities prior to developing new infrastructure and public service facilities. Maintain and improve connectivity within and among transportation systems. Provide transportation systems that are safe, energy-efficient, facilitate
All new development within Settlement Areas will be provided with appropriate services to sustain permanent occupancy. Partial services shall only be permitted in the following circumstances: (1) Where they are necessary to address failed individual on-site sewage services and individual on-site water services in existing development; or (2) within Settlement Areas, to allow for infilling and minor rounding out of existing development on partial services provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts. Where municipal sewage services and municipal water services or private communal sewage services and private communal water services are not provided, individual on-site sewage
While this was not a section addressed in a Policy Brochure or discussion paper, best practices suggest that new infrastructure should be developed with a goal of environmental and economic sustainability.
High-speed, reliable internet is lacking throughout the Township of South Frontenac.
The standard road width requirements may not be adequate for the movement of agricultural equipment. As nonagricultural traffic increases, it can be difficult for agricultural equipment to travel roadways.
Communal servicing can enable more land-efficient development than private servicing, and should be used wherever possible.
Residents are strongly in support of increased internet service, in both location and speed. Many wrote in with concerns regarding the internet service reliability.
Rural roads are facing challenges with an increase in the number of residential vehicles and agricultural industrial vehicles. Some feel as though the roads are too narrow, with no shoulder, and present hazards to users.
Some residents have expressed support for age-friendly community initiatives that include walkable communities and integrated transit systems (either stop-based or ondemand).
Concerns about allowing the development of secondary waterfront units in areas that are accessed and
The Township recognizes that developments in rural areas will need to have lots of sufficient size to support private servicing. The current standard of 0.8 hectare lots will be maintained for single detached dwellings.
Rural Transportation:
Council encourages the development of transitsupportive communities in order to increase the future potential of efficient rural transit in the Frontenacs. This includes the creation of active transportation connections within and between Settlement Areas and the clustering of transit-supportive uses such as schools, businesses, social services, and health facilities within Settlement Areas.
Private Lanes:
Council shall encourage waterfront development to be directed towards areas where there is adequate capacity for additional traffic on existing
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 40
Page 77 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
the movement of people and goods, and are appropriate to address projected needs.
services sand individual on-site water services may be used provided that site conditions are suitable for the long-term provision of such services with no negative impacts
Storm water management plans may be required for any new development consisting of more than four lots or for commercial or industrial developments with large areas of impervious surface (e.g., asphalt parking and loading areas). When reviewing any such development proposals, the approval authorities will encourage the retention of existing tree cover or natural vegetation and the provision of significant grassed and natural areas shall be encouraged to facilitate absorption of surface water into the ground.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
serviced by inadequate or unsafe private lanes.
Concerns about home occupations and home industries attracting surplus traffic to areas where access businesses are located on private lanes. Some residents have expressed support for alternative servicing solutions instead of private well and septic systems.
private lanes or towards areas where private lanes may be added.
The Official Plan will incorporate policies from the County of Frontenac Private Lane study (2016) to establish private lane standards and extensions to private lanes.
Internet Services:
Council recognizes the importance of internet connectivity to support growth and development of the community.
Stormwater Management:
Where possible, natural vegetation and trees should be preserved during and after development. Low impact development and green infrastructure are encouraged approaches to address stormwater management.
Communal Servicing:
Council shall encourage communal servicing, where feasible.
Council shall encourage development be directed towards areas where communal servicing will support residential, industrial, and commercial development.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 41
Page 78 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
The Public Realm
Waterfront Access:
Plan public streets, spaces, and facilities to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social interaction, and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity.
Division of Land
Provide opportunities for public access to shorelines. Plan and provide for a full range and equitable distribution of publiclyaccessible built and natural settings for recreation, including facilities, parklands, public spaces, open space areas, trails and linkages, and, where practical, water-based resources.
The County will explore funding mechanisms to support regionally significant open space and parkland acquisitions.
The County supports development that promotes active-transportation and pedestrian usage.
Settlement Areas should be the focus of growth and development
Development standards and practices that facilitate intensification, redevelopment and compact form should be promoted Outside of urban areas, rural character should be supported and maintained. Residential development, including lot creation that is locally appropriate may be permitted.
The County supports the continued operation and long term use of all regional park systems throughout the Frontenacs.
Support land use patterns that promote efficient development and sustain financial well-being
While this was not a section addressed in a Policy Brochure or discussion paper, best practices suggest that new development be integrated with active transportation systems.
Four Provincial Parks are present in the County: Bon Echo, Sharbot Lake, Silver Lake, and Frontenac Parks. All provide access to lakes and allow for many recreational activities.
Lot creation should take place either through Plan of Subdivision, Plan of Condominium, or Consent. The design of the subdivision should provide for a range of lot sizes directly related to the site’s topography, vegetation and soil and drainage characteristics.
Waterfront public access should be maintained and/or expanded in the Township.
The Township will continue to maintain public access to waterfronts and provide opportunities for public recreation.
Pedestrian-Friendly Development:
Subdivision lots need to be of adequate size to provide for proper installation of private services. Rural residential development should avoid locating on lands having significant agricultural capability and near areas where any significant impact
Development in Settlement Areas should be pedestrianoriented and connected to a network of active transportation options.
Parks and Open Space:
The Township values its natural areas such as parks and open spaces, and policy should strive to protect, preserve, and enhance these areas.
Farmers would like to see Council support for recreational trails that would direct ATV users away from trespassing on their properties.
Land severances may be needed to meet housing growth targets until other servicing options are available to support higher-density growth within settlement areas.
Other residents would like new severances to be permitted.
Rural area are expected to support growth over the next 25 years. Establishing alternate servicing options will assist in directing growth into settlement areas and to provide a greater variety of housing types.
It is generally supported that new large-scale developments occur through plans of subdivision and in Settlement Areas.
Rural areas are lacking necessary services for residents, such as reliable internet and road capacity.
Focus additional dwelling units (A.D.U.s) in rural residential areas where lot sizes and private water and sewage servicing can accommodate
Some residents are against re-setting the clock on new severances.
Large-scale development (i.e. subdivisions) shall provide dedicated communal green space for the benefit and use of residents and visitors.
New Lot Creation:
Council supports new lot creation through Plans of Subdivision and Condominiums. Projects that require private servicing should be of adequate size to provide for proper installation of services, and should not encroach upon prime agricultural lands.
Settlement Area Lot Severances:
It is the Township’s intention that new lot development in Settlement Areas will generally occur by plan of subdivision. However, severances may be
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 42
Page 79 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Agricultural
Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas should be supported by: a) building upon rural character, and leveraging rural amenities and assets; b) promoting regeneration, including the redevelopment of brownfield sites; c) accommodating an appropriate range and mix of housing in rural Settlement Areas; d) encouraging the conservation and redevelopment of existing rural housing stock on rural lands; e) using rural infrastructure and public service facilities efficiently; f) promoting diversification of the economic base and employment opportunities through goods and services, including value-added products and the sustainable management or use of resources; g) providing opportunities for sustainable and diversified tourism, including leveraging historical, cultural, and natural assets; h) conserving biodiversity and considering the ecological benefits provided by nature; and i) providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas
Official Plans shall designate Prime Agricultural Areas.
Prime agricultural areas shall be protected for long-term use for agriculture.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
on established agricultural activities will occur.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
them and can be accessed by a public road.
considered for the purposes of infilling and minor rounding out, where the following criteria are met:
Demonstration of limited rural residential development may include such measures as limits to the number of lots granted through consent and plans of subdivision
o
Hydrogeological and terrain conditions support development;
o
The development can be supported by communal servicing where available; and,
o
The development will front on public road of adequate standard. Where it is demonstrated that a plan of subdivision is not necessary for the orderly development of the land and will not limit such development by plan of subdivision.
Rural residential development shall reflect the intent of preserving the rural, open space character of the County.
Rural Area Lot Severances:
Farming is fundamental to the economic base and rural lifestyle of the County. It is in the County’s interest to preserve that lifestyle and to foster the agricultural community. The land base should be protected and the use of the lands must be predominantly agriculturally oriented to achieve these objectives. The farming community
South Frontenac has many agricultural resources that face impacts from development pressure. The agriculture and agri-food system can include several industries such as farm input and service supplier industries, primary agriculture, food and beverage processing, food distribution,
South Frontenac’s agriculture holds much of the area’s economic and cultural value. This should be recognized and protected from encroachment by development. Prime Agricultural Areas with livestock are at risk due to M.D.S.
Please refer to the Rural infographic page for recommended severance policies that would apply to rural areas.
Prime Agricultural Areas:
Council supports the protection of prime agricultural areas and recognizes the economic, cultural, and historic value farms add to the Township. Non-farm development in the vicinity of prime agricultural lands and other agriculturally productive
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 43
Page 80 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Do not permit the creation of new residential lots in prime agricultural areas.
Relation to County O.P.
Impacts from any new or expanding non-agricultural uses on surrounding agricultural operations and lands are to be mitigated to the extent feasible.
What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
forms a core economic basis for the rural community.
Planning authorities shall designate prime agricultural areas and specialty crop areas in accordance with guidelines developed by the Province, as amended from time to time. Planning authorities are encouraged to use an agricultural system approach to maintain and enhance the geographic continuity of the agricultural land base and the functional and economic connections to the agri-food network.
November 2021
Value-Added Uses – land uses that add value to farm products may also be permitted on farms in both Agricultural and Rural designations. However, the scale of operations may not exceed the needs of the surrounding agricultural community and will be secondary to the farming activity of the property.
retail, wholesale and food service industries.
Land uses that add value to farm products may be permitted on farms in both Agricultural and Rural designations. For these types of uses located in Prime Agricultural Areas designated in the Township Official Plans, the Agriculture – Permitted Uses section of the P.P.S. shall apply. Only permit lot creation and lot adjustments in Prime Agricultural Areas in their respective Official Plans in accordance with the P.P.S.
Foster and protect the agricultural community to ensure its viability for the economic and social benefit of the County.
Identify and protect Prime Agricultural Areas, as well as designate them in accordance with the P.P.S.
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
The Township is subject to Minimum Distance Standards (M.D.S.), requiring buffers between agricultural uses and residential areas. As residential areas grow and expand, they limit the agricultural potential of nearby areas. Creating opportunities for farmers to add more value to what they produce (e.g., by allowing them to turn the wheat that they produce into baked goods that they could sell at a higher value) can increase the economic potential for agricultural businesses. These diversified agricultural uses can create new jobs, increase tourism, and encourage economic sustainability. The P.P.S permits a limited number of types of consents within prime agricultural areas. Consents within prime agricultural areas are limited to: surplus dwelling severances created through farm consolidation; agriculturerelated uses; and farm splits provided lots are sufficiently large for agricultural practices in the area. Limiting the amount and type of lots that can be created can prevent largescale residential development in prime agricultural areas. There is a need to ensure that the rural character of the Township is maintained as well as the viability of agriculture across the Township.
Policy Recommendations
requirements and expanding development patterns.
Include policies supporting the growth of infrastructure (e.g. roads) and services (e.g. electric) that support the productivity of working farms.
Severance in prime agricultural areas should be limited to surplus dwelling severance, agricultural-related uses, and farm splits.
Encourage practices that are compatible with the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals and the climate action plan.
Encourage plant-based agriculture.
Residents support the inclusion of policy supporting value-added agricultural practices on farms.
lands will be discouraged unless they will not encroach on agricultural lands following the Minimum Distance Separation formulae. Value-added Agriculture:
The Township supports the creation of uses that highlight the importance and value of farming. On this basis, uses such as farm tours, cafes, processing operations such as flour refinement, pickling, canning, or baking, and shops for the sale of site-produced goods shall be permitted within the agricultural designated areas.
Agriculture-related Industrial and Commercial Uses on Agricultural Lands:
Council recognizes that the agriculture and agri-food system can include several industries such as farm input and service supplier industries, primary agriculture, food and beverage processing, food distribution, retail, wholesale and food service industries.
Agricultural uses will also be permitted in rural areas of the Township.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 44
Page 81 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
Environmental Protection
Consider the potential impacts of climate change that may increase the risk associated with natural hazards.
Protecting Public Health and Safety:
Development shall generally be directed to areas outside of lands that are unsafe for development due to the presence of hazardous forest types for wildland fire.
Direct development to areas outside of hazardous sites, including unstable soils or unstable bedrock (e.g., karst topography).
Development and site alteration may be permitted in the flood fringe, subject to appropriate floodproofing.
Development on, abutting or adjacent to lands affected by mine hazards, oil, gas, and salt hazards, or former mineral mining operations, mineral aggregate operations, or petroleum resource operations may be permitted only if rehabilitation or other measures to address and mitigate known or suspected hazards are under way or have been completed.
Planning authorities shall support energy conservation and efficiency, improved air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and preparing for the impacts of a changing climate through land use and development patterns. Promote the use of active transportation and transit in and between residential, employment (including commercial and industrial) and institutional uses and other areas
The objective is to reduce the amount of energy consumed over the next generation, combined with renewable energy production and encouragement. Natural linkages shall be protected in order to maintain, restore and/or improve the diversity and connectivity of natural features and the long-term ecological function and biodiversity of natural heritage systems.
New lot creation shall not be allowed within 300 metres of at-capacity lake trout lakes located in Frontenac County.
Contain policies to protect these lakes, including exceptions to the prohibition of development near at-capacity lakes, such as tile field setbacks.
Identify and protect those regional or provincially significant A.N.S.I.s where no development shall permitted in or adjacent to them unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the A.N.S.I. and its ecological function.
Promote design and orientation which maximizes energy efficiency and conservation, and considers the mitigating effects of vegetation and green infrastructure
Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard areas require special development considerations. Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard areas are classified under Environmental Protection Area boundaries. These areas should be monitored closely and have limitations on the type and size of development permitted within them.
Some residents are concerned about the threats posed by climate change to the ecology and rare environmental features found in South Frontenac.
There is some support for renewable energy initiatives.
Residents have expressed support for the conservation of natural lands that are at risk of development.
South Frontenac is home to areas of great ecological value. These areas and networks should be protected.
Development should generally be directed away from natural and human-made hazards areas. Where required, studies and measures to address or mitigate known or suspected hazards must be completed prior to development.
Climate Change:
Waterfront areas and shorelines are particularly vulnerable and will require greater protections from future development. South Frontenac is within the Frontenac Arch U.N.E.S.C.O. world biosphere which is recognized for its ecological significant and biodiversity.
Council and the Township should work with conservation authorities to identify, catalogue, and develop strategies for ecological preservation.
A range of opportunities to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change should be addressed: o
Focusing growth within established Settlement Areas and promoting compact, complete mixed use communities;
o
Promotion of green infrastructure, such as grassy swales and rain gardens to promote infiltration; roadside curb cuts to direct runoff to grassy swales and rain gardens permeable pavement and green roofs to reduce runoff; rock pits, catch basins, and detention ponds to reduce peak runoff flows; and water and energy conserving infrastructure;
o
Promotion of energy efficient building design;
The impacts of climate change on our natural environment must be considered.
To protect trout lakes, under such exceptional circumstances, new
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 45
Page 82 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Maximize vegetation within Settlement Areas, where feasible
Promote energy conservation and provide opportunities for increased energy supply.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
development requiring approval under the Planning Act that would, for example, prohibit removal of vegetation, require a 30 metre setback for all new buildings, or prohibit the use of fertilizers.
Identify the moderately sensitive atcapacity lake trout lakes in their Official Plans with policies addressing development around these lakes to ensure their long-term sustainability.
o
Protecting the agricultural land bases;
o
Protecting and restoring natural areas and water systems, as well as protecting shorelines and increasing tree canopy cover; and,
o
Promoting active transportation networks.
Conservation:
Development and/or site alteration in fish habitat or within lands adjacent to fish habitat shall not be permitted except in accordance with federal and provincial legislation and can be demonstrated through an Environmental Impact Study that there will be no negative impact on fish habitat and its ecological function. Designate on a land use schedule and protect those wetlands where development and site alteration is prohibited, including provincially significant wetlands and significant coastal wetlands. Adopt mechanisms (such as site plan control, consent or development agreements) that would minimize and control the removal of vegetation, and ensure the protection of naturally vegetated buffers adjacent to any provincially significant wetlands. Development and site alteration shall not be permitted within lands adjacent to provincially significant wetlands or coastal wetlands (significant or otherwise) unless the ecological
Council supports the conservation of our unique and valuable natural heritage areas, and will work closely with conservation authorities, not-forprofit agencies, land trusts, Nature Conservancy Canada and Aboriginal groups to actively protect these areas.
Ecological Preservation:
Council will work with the County, Provincial ministries, regional conservation authorities and organizations to identify gaps in ecological protection policies and environmentally sensitive areas.
Natural Heritage:
The County will undertake a Natural Heritage Study update in 2022, to update existing natural heritage mapping and take a systems approach to natural heritage protection. Council supports the
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 46
Page 83 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on their features or their functions.
Resource Extraction
Mineral mining operations and petroleum resource operations shall be identified and protected from development and activities that would preclude or hinder their expansion or continued use or which would be incompatible for reasons of public health, public safety or environmental impact. Minerals and petroleum resources shall be protected for long-term use.
The County recognizes that nonrenewable resources like mineral aggregate deposits are an important component of the economy of the County which must be protected for future use. It is also recognized that the extraction of the aggregates must be undertaken in an environmentally sound manner that adequately protects significant natural environment features and minimizes community disruption, while protecting existing operation from hinder their expansion or continued use.
consideration and adoption of an O.P. amendment that will incorporate the recommendations of the County Natural Heritage Study.
While this was not an area of focus for policy brochures or discussion papers, best practices suggest that resource extraction areas be protected from development or encroachment by noncompatible land uses. Best practices also suggest that former resource extraction land be remediated before land is used for other purposes.
Council should support the protection of areas with resources such as mining lands, mineral aggregate lands, and forestry lands.
Resources:
Existing licensed pits and quarries will be recognized in the extractive resource designation and will be protected from incompatible uses.
Development should be avoided in areas of known deposits of mineral aggregate resources or adjacent lands, which would preclude or hinder the establishment of new operations or access to the resources. Development shall only permitted if resource use would not be feasible; or the proposed lands use or development serves a greater public-interest; and issues of public health public safety and environment have been addressed. .
Activities that contribute to mineral aggregate resource conservation (e.g. aggregate recycling facility) shall be considered as an accessory use within aggregate operations.
Rehabilitation:
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 47
Page 84 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Cultural Heritage
Relation to P.P.S.
Planning authorities shall engage with Aboriginal communities and coordinate on land use planning matters. Planning authorities shall consider Aboriginal interests when identifying, protecting, and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources. Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential unless significant archaeological resources have been conserved.
Relation to County O.P.
The County of Frontenac and/or the Townships may consult with the Algonquins of Ontario with regard to land use planning affecting any of the following matters within the land claim area: o Protection of water quality and utilization of lakes and rivers including the Rideau Canal within the land claim area; o Any development that would have an impact on navigable waterways and their waterbeds; o Any archaeological studies related to proposed development where areas of Algonquin interest have been identified; and o Any Environmental Impact Studies related to proposed development where areas of Algonquin interest have been identified.
Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Best planning practices support the continued engagement and partnership with Aboriginal Peoples.
Cultural heritage lands and artefacts should be noted and a database or list developed.
While this was not an area of focus in the policy brochures, through our policy audit, there was a gap identified in the existing O.P. regarding Aboriginal consultation policies.
While this was not an area of focus in the policy brochures, through our policy audit, there was a gap identified in the existing O.P. regarding archaeological assessments.
South Frontenac is the home of the U.N.E.S.C.O. World Heritage site of the Rideau Canal.
Members of the public inquired about the level of engagement conducted to date with Aboriginal communities.
Policy Recommendations
In areas where land was formerly used for resource extraction, remediation and rehabilitation must be complete before land may be used for other purposes.
Comprehensive rehabilitation planning is encouraged where there is a concentration of mineral aggregate operations.
Aboriginal Consultation:
Interest from participants to ensure that Aboriginal communities were engaged and involved.
Aboriginal communities will be consulted when development on culturally significant lands is planned or where archaeological assessments are required.
Cultural Heritage:
Council may develop a Municipal register of cultural heritage and archaeological resources or assist other organizations and work with the Ministry of Culture in developing, sharing and maintaining an inventory.
Development adjacent to designated heritage property shall not detract from the overall heritage character of the area.
Council will encourage the development of public and private financial support for the conservation of designated heritage property.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 48
Page 85 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.
Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
Council shall require a heritage permit before erection, demolition, alteration or removal of any building or structure or alteration of external portion of a designated heritage property.
Council will establish policies to recognize and protect the cultural heritage of the Rideau Canal waterway within South Frontenac.
Archaeological Assessment:
Council shall require that in any proposed development and prior to the undertaking of any public work, private development, planning application, consideration be given to the possible effects and impacts of such works or development on cultural heritage and archaeological resources and those impacts, where identified, are appropriately mitigated.
Council shall require an archaeological impact assessment carried out by an archeologist licensed under the Ontario Heritage Act, when any public work, private development, planning application will affect an area containing a known archaeological site or adjacent to a cemetery or an area considered to have archaeological potential or is within 250 metres (820 feet) of a
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 49
Page 86 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report Theme Area
Relation to P.P.S.
Relation to County O.P.
November 2021 What We Found (i.e. brochures and discussion papers)
What We Heard (i.e. public input from Open Houses)
Policy Recommendations
Provincially registered or known archeological site or cultural heritage feature.
Council will work collaboratively with the County to undertake an archaeological master plan to establish a framework for undertaking archaeological assessments across the Township.
Our Community Our Vision Our Official Plan Page 50
Page 87 of 264
South Frontenac 2040
Page 88 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B – Engagement Summary
51
Page 89 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B1 – Summary of Feedback via Emails and Letters
52
Page 90 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Notes on Comments Received 15 July 2019 – 15 October 2021 Comments received via email and letter were generally supportive of the Official Plan project. Discussion aligned with the key themes identified by the Township. Major points of discussion centered on environmental protection and support for the preservation of Frontenac’s natural heritage features. Suggestions on these protections typically focused on limiting development to hamlets (Settlement Areas) and working with conservation authorities to increase protections for vulnerable ecological areas. Residents generally agreed that the Frontenac Arch’s biosphere should be protected and development should be directed away from at-capacity lake trout lakes. Resident services were a commonly discussed theme, particularly rural internet access and reliability. Some residents mentioned how the limited internet was presenting boundaries to their participation in public engagement sessions, or prevented them from participating in the local economy of the Township by forcing them to utilize more reliable resources in Kingston. Lot severances had varied responses, both supportive and against. Some wanted the severance limit to “re-set” upon OP adoption, others hoped that there would be no or limited additional severances permitted. Two residents wrote in with specific questions regarding their lots and how the OP would affect their severance plans. Several residents wrote in with concerns as to how waterfront development limitations may affect their properties, and reminded the Township of an OMB decision that protected and grandfathered in existing waterfront cottages and residential buildings with exemptions to conforming to Township policies. Housing and development in Settlement Areas were also commonly discussed, with residents offering suggestions on how to accommodate an aging population while maintaining an environment that attracts new residents and retains youth and young families. Comment Themes Theme Resident Services (sewage, roads, internet, etc.) Request to be added to email/notification list Environmental Protection Lot severances Settlement Areas Waterfront development Groundwater/intake protection Agricultural Waterfront protection Request for documents/materials Climate change Short-term rentals
of comments
11 10 10 8 7 7 5 5 5 4 4 4 53
Page 91 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Theme Natural heritage features and areas Fish habitats General public engagement/participation Tourism Stormwater management Development & community aesthetics Recreation (ATV trails) Value-added uses for agriculture Zoning By-law questions/requests Economic Development Youth engagement/participation Age-friendly communities Active transportation Aboriginal engagement/inclusion Request for specific info on their lot/severances Review of provided documents (brochures, etc.) Cannabis Garbage and dumping Housing Types Green energy
of comments
3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Notes on Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Letter The Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (R.V.C.A.) requests that additional definitions be added for fish habitat, flood plain for river and stream systems, natural heritage features and areas, site alteration, and wetlands. They also express support for preservation of natural heritage, waterfront and shoreline access for recreation, development that does not impede on environmentally important or sensitive areas, and updates to land use schedules to include linkages and biodiversity schedules.
Notes on Frontenac Federation of Agriculture Letter The Frontenac Federation of Agriculture (F.F.A.) expresses concerns that residential development is infringing on agricultural lands due to MDS and rural severances, that new rural residents are trespassing on agricultural land with all-terrain vehicles, that greater municipal servicing is needed (roads are too narrow and dangerous and internet connectivity is poor), and other concerns around how agriculture can be supported and protected through township policy.
Notes on Cataraqui Conservation Letter Cataraqui Conservation noted that they have reviewed the OP from both a natural hazards perspective and a natural heritage and water quality and quantity perspective. They have provided guidance with suggestions to consider adding a climate change objective, support communal servicing options instead of on-site private services, limit new development reliant on 54
Page 92 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
new private roads, and generally implement strong policy to protect water features, intake areas, and environmentally sensitive areas.
Notes on West Devil Lake Property Owners Group Letter The West Devil Lake Property Owners Group (W.D.L.P.O.G.) represents 85 seasonal, semipermanent and permanent property owners on West Devil Lake Lane. The W.D.L.P.O.G. expresses support of the vision, goals, and guiding principles of the Official Plan, and supports each of the four key themes addressed by the policy brochures. They are predominantly interested in increased servicing support for the growth of permanent residents in the West Devils Lake Lane area and protecting the lake ecosystems.
Notes on Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee Meeting The Township of South Frontenac Lake Ecosystem Advisory Committee held a meeting on September 1, 2021 at which they discussed the upcoming Official Plan. The Committee brought up concerns that some areas with a significant amount of short term rentals are also areas that experience a shortage in available long-term rentals, increasing housing instability, and concerns surrounding waterfront development and the servicing and environmental risks accompanying such development. The Committee expressed interest in the municipality appointing their own environmental expert to conduct studies related to development, as opposed to relying on the report from the individual chosen by the developer, and interest in ensuring shoreline protection whether or not there is a structure or dwelling present on the property.
55
Page 93 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B2 – Summary of Aboriginal Consultation to Date
56
Page 94 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
Consultation notices were sent to the following: Community Name Alderville First Nation Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte Shabot Obaajiwan Algonquins of Ontario Metis Nations of Ontario Huron Wendat
Date Notice Sent May 5, 2021 May 5, 2021 July 29, 2021 May 5, 2021 May 5, 2021 May 5, 2021
Community meetings were held as follows: Community Name Metis Nation of Ontario Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte Algonquins of Ontario AOO –Jp2g Consultant Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte
Date May 5, 2021 June 8, 2021 June 8, 2021 July 20, 2021 July 21, 2021
November 2021
Notes on June 8, 2021 Meeting with Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte The initial consultation with the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte (M.B.Q.) began with introductions of attendees, followed by presentations from the Township of South Frontenac and M.B.Q. The presentation from the Township included discussion of the planning profession as a “colonial/settler” framework, and of meeting participation and suggestions on how to involve Council. The presentation from the M.B.Q. included a request to use their term, kanyenkehahka, instead of Mohawk, and provided background information on the M.B.Q. and the importance and meaning of the land to them. The M.B.Q. expressed interest in protecting the environment and their rights and culture for future generations, and provided suggestions for engagement timeframes that will allow them to provide their insight on the Official Plan at a reasonable pace.
Notes on July 8, 2021 Meeting with Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte The second consultation with the M.B.Q. was intended to follow-up from the introductory session and inquire about meaningful engagement and consultation engagement and protocols. Dillon enquired about reports or research that the M.B.Q. has that would be beneficial to informing the interests of the M.B.Q. within the new Official Plan and it was noted that there may be authorization and compensation required to access the reports. Community engagement methods were discussed and a comprehensive survey was suggested, though it is important to note that a survey is not considered a meaningful approach to engagement and consultation. Finally, primary methods and points of contact for this project were determined for work moving forward.
Notes on July 20, 2021 Meeting with JP2G Consultants/Algonquins of Ontario The initial consultation with the Algonquins of Ontario (A.O.O.) was facilitated by James Hutton of JP2G Consultants. It was recommended to Dillon that the Official Plan team reach out to 57
Page 95 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
several suggested contacts for advice on how to navigate the consultation and review processes. JP2G highlighted four land claims that fall within the boundaries of South Frontenac that will require special consideration for the Official Plan and supporting documents. The meeting concluded with a plan to reach out to other A.O.O. contacts for next steps support.
58
Page 96 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B3 – Information Collected from Attendees Following August 2021 Open Houses
59
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Following the four (4) August 2021 Open Houses, attendees were sent a short survey following the event to gather additional feedback. The questions asked in this survey were based on policy directions suggested initially in the policy brochures. Respondents replied through the Zoom meeting-affiliated link and the results are tabulated in the following table Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
Through tax concessions, possibly. There seems to be a dearth of multiple housing units - low rise apartments etc.
All of the above.
Not sure. Would want to emphasize and encourage local initiatives.
It should be part of our identity - on all logos, tourism brochures etc. Also, strong policies to enhance our environment.
3
By subsidization?
Perhaps, designate top tier communities, such as Verona and Sydenham. My concern would be that, with the recent high demand for rural dwellings, it might be difficult to control population growth. Amending lot size restrictions in a community setting.
The question holds the answers…. Water purification plant(s); sewage filtration; when roads improved, widen for bike/pedestrian areas especially in community settings or within 5(?) km. of a community area in which higher density of residences?
Tax deferrals? For start-ups —- twothree years of reduced taxes? Encourage new businesses into `cluster’ or business parks locations.
Use hashtag Frontenac Arch Biosphere and bilines whenever possible. Incorporate it in the official crest?
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? I think this is rapidly becoming the most urgent issue; central to all others. Encourage move to EVs, by providing charging stations. Encourage densification rather than spread in our main communities so that they are walkable.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
N/A
N/A
Not sure but it is a valid goal. We find that we have to go to the farms or certain shops to get local food.
As mentioned during the consultation, allow them to provide ancillary services which add value to their product on their property.
Maintain or increase recycling programs. Have recycling drop-off sites throughout Township to allow dropoffs more convenient and regular.
Encourage more farm market locations — by offering assistance on how to begin and run hoe based markets.
Education programs; by allowing secondary or more single family homes to be built on a family farm — to encourage family run businesses to continue (yes, it could be abused but it also could work).
Page 97 of 264
60
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
4
no immediate idea
Within villages and settlements. Not clear on what is meant by ‘integrated into existing communities’. Not clear in what way do you want to integrate it?
All are required unless already provided. Not clear on what you are expecting as an answer.
Term-limiting tax breaks. If it brings a certain amount of business that employs ‘x’ people, give them a tax break for a number of years. This will allow the tax base to increase through economic growth and possible population growth.
Again, I don’t understand what you expect as a response. First reaction is ‘a sign’. One must be careful to ensure that a significant amount of funds is not spent for no tangible gain.
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? First, it needs to identify the effects of global warming within the Township. 2nd, determine what, within the Township, is actually causing these effects. 3rd, determine what can be done to minimize the causes and the assoc. cost. 4th, implement based on what people are prepare to pay for it.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
Increased support to local farmers’ markets; dedicated locations, advertising, minimal cost to vendors.
Don’t overwhelm them with rules, regulations and paperwork. Work with them to help them so it is seen by all as the Township is helping vs the Township is an obstacle that is just trying to take as much money as possible.
Page 98 of 264
61
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
5
Openly accepting new and innovative ideas
Higher density housing works best in settled communities that offer more social resources
Al of the above when practical. Trying to provide all services to all areas is unfeasible and unsupportive
I believe the staff is already well equipped and has the knowledge and experience
It shouldn’t be the main focus and it shouldn’t handcuff future development that is diverse and clean
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? Climate change is unfortunately unstoppable. I believe money will be better spent if we laser focus more on winnable challenges such as better recycling, zero greenhouse emissions, low carbon footprints, sustainable industries etc. Feel good policies about smaller lot sizes or farther set-backs offer very little and are more for optics and political spin. A tiny home, off the grid with eco-friendly occupants (built 20 meters from a lake) is much more desirable than a huge palace with a pool, rolling lawn, tennis courts built 120 meters from the lake.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
Not sure…but best of luck
Less regulations are always beneficial…mostly at the provincial level though
Page 99 of 264
62
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
6
Incentivize for medium density development forms (e.g. rowhouses, low rise apartments, etc.) in Settlement Areas. The housing crisis is more an affordability crises than a supply crises - new single detached homes on large rural lots will not address the problem.
Settlement Areas.
All of the above. Consider enabling communal servicing for water, sewage, etc.
N/A
Continue with progressive development policies (e.g. setbacks, lot sizes, water frontage, lot coverage, etc.), require appropriately scoped assessments in support of new development (e.g. EIA vs Lake Impact Assessment, vs Lake Capacity studies), implement shoreline protection through site plan control.
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? Consider tree protection by-law for significant woodlands. Promote green infrastructure (i.e. Low Impact Development). Consider greater setbacks and development standards in areas of natural hazard risk.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
Continue to protect prime and high quality agricultural land. Enable diversified agricultural uses.
Enable diversified agricultural uses.
Page 100 of 264
63
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
Increase amenities (shopping, medical, internet service, etc..)
Close to existing residential concentrations. Increase size of smaller hamlets.
HIGH SPEED INTERNET! More shopping, medical.
N/A
N/A
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? Talking about one of the questions that was posed at the zoom call, the lakes are warming up and lasting longer and longer without ice. Therefore, longer times for algae to grow. I think it is necessary for farmers, golf courses to be more accountable for their run off into the lakes. Many are lakeside or very close, their fertilizer runs into the lake. With the intense heat, an increase of algae blooms etc. are occurring. Perhaps a filter/ berm should be mandatory at the edge of these properties. Incentives for greener homes / cottages. Incentives for reforestation. Bylaws regarding deforestation (take a tree plant a tree)
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
N/A
Local food stands, farmer markets in each village.
Local Farmers Markets.
Local Farmers Markets.
Page 101 of 264
64
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
9
N/A
in hamlets
communal water and sewage
Focus on certain types, like local high intensity agriculture and light manufacturing expansion.
At least signs, and as part of the OP to heighten the need for related policies.
10
Don’t make permits so difficult to obtain and allow severances so developers and individuals can build.
Higher density housing can be located where ever people want to be. Let people sever and develop, people will come to where ever there is space made available.
This is a rural community. Water and sewage everywhere is unrealistic. High speed internet is as simple to provide as the old bell infrastructure was by using Fiber. Everyone had a copper bell line, help everyone get a Fiber link to their homes. Help WTC, make their job easier and provide subsidies to them to encourage their desire to cover all of South Frontenac
N/A
N/A
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? Be explicit about how certain policies affect the climate crisis. i.e., greater housing density and walkable communities, local agricultural production, development to facilitate the use of electric vehicles and local power production, since mass transportation is not a real option, N/A
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
preserving agricultural land, serious limits on its development will make it more affordable to new farmers who want to produce good for local consumption, zoning for small abattoirs and other processing facilities N/A
- In terms of other agricultural related uses, can we specify that extra development on agricultural lands be related to produce from that farm, or nearby farms, for instance, if a market or café was permitted, could it be a requirement that it use local produce?
N/A
Page 102 of 264
65
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
11
Ensuring by-laws are flexible and promoting knowledge that options exist.
In communities. The only other option is the creation of tiny home communities that can be semi self-reliant. I am thinking seniors who want to remain as SF residents but can no longer manage large single family homes by themselves.
N/A
I am not certain how many people know what the biosphere is and what impact living within it has on our environment. We need to improve that messaging.
12
Designated areas for more specific uses that are deemed “underserved” like seniors and affordable housing initiatives SF land purchases that would allow for discounted lot values to persons building such housing types
In villages but force land owners who are derelict in their property appearance to clean up before permission is granted
We are rural. Building up communities may require water and sewer. Again, i do not have enough knowledge to know when that threshold is being reached. Overall, roads and internet are critical in today’s world. The pandemic has shown that folks are willing to join remotely if that infrastructure was in place. Roads and internet
A specific light industrial park where some synergies can be achieved Consider incubation spaces for small start-ups
Set a screen that EVERY application must be vetted with whether it be a zoning minor variance or building permit
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? I wish i had some good answers.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
the new policies on farms covered today will help and at least been on the right track.
again, well covered in today’s session.
Stop allowing lot coverage variances like the one just approved on High Falls Lane where building foot print doubled and total dev area went from 500 sq. ft. to 2000 sq. ft.
Allow for SF owned market with low stall fees and daily use not just weekend
Allow onsite direct sales of products and assist in advertising/profiling these types of added uses
Page 103 of 264
66
Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Respondent #
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Where should higherdensity housing be located, and how can it be integrated into existing communities?
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are needed to support a diverse economy?
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support diversifying economic development across the Township?
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
13
This is a tough question because municipalities don’t really have the tools to obtain a wider range of housing. Encourage secondary units in Settlement Areas. Development is market-driven & unfortunately tends not to support a wider range of housing.
High-speed internet is important. Services that draw both locals and visitors support a diverse community. (Yes, infrastructure is necessary but as a resident-to-be I don’t really know current deficiencies.)
Sorry, as a not-yetresident I lack insight to this question.
Review sustainability goals & implement as many as applicable. Promote knowledge of why Biosphere was designated & how to protect. Promote good practice for landowners. Promote compatible recreation e.g., birding.
14
Make it possible for people to have permits to severe properties. Every 20 years is a very long time for people to wait to severe. New people in the township that have moved in with acreage should be able to severe sooner.
Locate higher density housing in Settlement Areas. Build complete communities with sidewalks near existing community services. Be careful to protect light & private green space (green space will be needed for stormwater management) & encourage smaller lot sizes. N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan? Promote green space & encourage plants native to the area as locally sourced as possible. Keep any flood hazard mapping current. Encourage cycling.
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production practices?
Sorry, non-resident lack of local knowledge here
Ask farmers.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 104 of 264
67
Page 105 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B4 – Information Collected Through the Online Survey As noted in the report, an online survey hosted on the engagefrontenac.ca website ran from August 19th to August 30th. This section compiles responses from the digital survey.
68
Page 106 of 264
Official Plan Open House Poll Questions
SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 12 January 2021 - 25 October 2021 PROJECT NAME: Official Plan Review - South Frontenac 2040
Page 107 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
REGISTRATION QUESTIONS
Page 1 of 64
Page 108 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q1
Postal Code
1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%)
3 (75.0%) 3 (75.0%)
Question options Harrowsmith, ON, K0H1V0
Mandatory Question (4 response(s)) Question type: Region Question
Page 2 of 64
Perth Road, ON, K0H2L0
Page 109 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
SURVEY QUESTIONS
Page 3 of 64
Page 110 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q1
What type of housing is most needed in the Township? Select all that you feel apply. 35
40
35
30
21
20 17
15
14
20
10
Question options Single detached dwellings Tiny homes
Duplex or semi-detached
Town houses
Apartment buildings
Senior’s Housing
Basement apartments or apartments above garages
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Q2
Should the majority of new housing (e.g. 60%) be directed to settlement areas (i.e.
villages)?
23 (37.7%) 23 (37.7%)
38 (62.3%) 38 (62.3%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (61 response(s), 4 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 4 of 64
Page 111 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q3
Should rural residential development occur mostly by consent (individual lots) or by plan
of subdivision?
18 (29.5%) 18 (29.5%)
43 (70.5%) 43 (70.5%)
Question options Consents
Subdivision
Optional question (61 response(s), 4 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 5 of 64
Page 112 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q4
Should each rural property be eligible to sever (divide into) more residential lots?
30 (47.6%) 30 (47.6%)
33 (52.4%) 33 (52.4%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (63 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 6 of 64
Page 113 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q5
Since the year 2000, each rural property has been eligible to sever three (3) residential
lots. Should each rural property be eligible to sever additional residential lots?
27 (42.9%) 27 (42.9%)
36 (57.1%) 36 (57.1%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (63 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 7 of 64
Page 114 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q6
What features are needed in an age-friendly community? Select all that you feel apply.
55
52 50
50
43
45
38
40
36
35
30
23
25
20
15
10
5
Question options Sidewalks
Community facilities (e.g. library, arena, medical centre)
Accessible housing
Housing for all ages
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 8 of 64
On-demand transit
Retail uses (e.g. grocery store, pharmacy)
Page 115 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q7
In what ways can housing affordability be addressed in the Township? Select all that
apply.
40
35 35
33
29 30
28
25
20 20
14 15
10 6
5
Question options Increase supply of rental housing
Create variety of housing types
New developments have a percentage of affordable units
Optional question (61 response(s), 4 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 9 of 64
Build seniors housing
Develop subsidized housing
Tiny homes
Other (please specify)
Page 116 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q8
Does the Township need more rental housing?
21 (35.6%) 21 (35.6%)
38 (64.4%) 38 (64.4%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (59 response(s), 6 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 10 of 64
Page 117 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q9
Should second residential units be permitted in waterfront areas?
30 (50.0%)
30 (50.0%)
30 (50.0%)
30 (50.0%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (60 response(s), 5 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 11 of 64
Page 118 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q10
Should second residential units be permitted in settlement areas and rural areas?
7 (12.1%) 7 (12.1%)
51 (87.9%) 51 (87.9%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (58 response(s), 7 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 12 of 64
Page 119 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q11
How can the Township encourage a wider variety of housing types?
Screen Name Redacted
I think allowing second residential units are a great idea where
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
there is enough water and septic space availability
Screen Name Redacted
Permitting second residential units in the zoning; identifying areas
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
within settlement areas for higher density; encouraging mixed use buildings with retail at grade and residential units above.
Screen Name Redacted
Tiny homes are not the answer, they are a trend that is not
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
supported by CMHC. The current property owners who have invested in this area need to be protected from short term rentals especially on private lanes. What is the identity of SF? Retirement area, bedroom community for Kingston, location for tourism. Who do you want to attract? Jobs along with a transit system are essential to grow communities.
Screen Name Redacted
By having different amenities to support different age groups. I.e,
8/25/2021 10:46 AM
parks, rec facilities, pharmaceuticals etc.
Screen Name Redacted
Allow people to severe properties more often. Every 20 years is a
8/25/2021 11:15 AM
long time to wait to severe property.
Screen Name Redacted
The township must consider the enormous vulnerability of the
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
environment in South Frontenac, given the fractured bedrock, the vulnerable aquifers, and the large number of lakes and water bodies. Additional building and lots on the lakes cannot be allowed, and the transformation of seasonal cottages in to permanent residences should not be allowed, unless there is a ten acre lot, and significant set back from the water, and waterways. Our lakes are slowly dying, and many are becoming ‘unlivable’ with cyanotoxins, and other contaminants.
Screen Name Redacted
Make it easier for different types of housing to be built on the
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
current zone of the property. Multi residential for example. More municipal services in villages.
Screen Name Redacted Page 13 of 64
Allow a full range of housing.
Page 120 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 8/26/2021 05:18 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Education Have people on your board that are forward thinking
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Streamline the process of approvals; be open to innovative
8/30/2021 07:30 AM
solutions;
Screen Name Redacted
Not certain as Sydenham is a bedroom community. Transportation
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
to Kingston is needed.
Screen Name Redacted
Firstly, I found some of the questions above somewhat restricted.
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
There should be the option of “unsure” or “other” with room for a comment. For example, I do not know if the Township needs more rental units, so I did not reply to that question. I don’t know what is meant by “second residential units”; another house on the same piece of property? What size property? I cannot answer Question 11, as it is too broad. Offer subsidies? Incentivize developers? (that’s not fair or ethical, unless property owners receive the same incentive). Do we need a wider variety of housing types? What variety types are lacking?
Screen Name Redacted
Not sure what the sense is! Inequality has become visually
8/31/2021 09:31 AM
apparent in this township. For those with the money nothing is denied. (Ie, building on undersized sp. waterfront.) Follow the regulations for all. Do something to regulate the airbnb craziness that has had a major impact on housing availability & affordability
Screen Name Redacted
Raise tax base on higher valued properties to pay for public
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
housing owned by municipality Regulate house flipping.
Screen Name Redacted
More development options
8/31/2021 12:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Provide incentives
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted 8/31/2021 07:30 PM
Page 14 of 64
Allow the construction of new rental units
Page 121 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Work with developers
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Certainly an evaluation of approaches to servicing that can
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
increase density in settlement areas. Removal of barriers to diverse approaches to housing may also be helpful - minimum sizes (building code covers this anyway) etc. Transportation may also be a factor - with many residents working in Kingston, if there are transportation links established (on demand transit or some other link) perhaps housing may be incentivized. Finally, and this is definitely an outside the box thought - but the township should use its significant reserves to acquire land not just for employment purposes but for housing purposes, and then prepare the land (zoning, servicing if available) for development. Land value is increasing quickly but at the moment remains significantly lower than in Kingston or other surrounding areas. It is likely that this land will increase in value, and also be sold at market rates in the future if adequately prepared to be development ready. This would also help the township direct certain forms of development in areas best fit to the needs of the community.
Screen Name Redacted
Allow tiny homes or allow a homeowner to construct another
9/03/2021 10:31 AM
dwelling on the property for a family member
Screen Name Redacted
By buying land now near settlements, building infrastructure for
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
future sale. Conditions on the sale can regulate people of home, which buyers to select (e.g. residents of South Frontenac to get first choice.
Screen Name Redacted
Seriously think about municipal servicing in settlement areas in
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
order to allow larger types of developments (row housing, apartments, etc.). Allowing larger developments without considering municipal servicing is irresponsible and unsustainable.
Screen Name Redacted
Good evidence of needs. Encouragement for less familiar options if
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
they meet those needs (e.g. Tiny Homes).
Screen Name Redacted
The Township could allow waterfront properties to incorporate 2nd
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
dwellings.
Page 15 of 64
Page 122 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Regulate size and type of dwellings based on occupancy and
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
demand.
Screen Name Redacted
By staying out of the way and letting the market decide what
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
housing type is appropriate
Screen Name Redacted
Adopt a sustainable housing model that focusses on house that
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
reduce energy usage, but allow more varieties of housing like tiny homes and multi unit residential development
Screen Name Redacted
Infrastructure. Municipal water/sewer/gas
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted
With reference to above mentioned ‘2nd residential units’ it is
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
unclear what you mean (property had one unit wants to sever and build a 2nd?). #11. Incentives to build more modest accommodations.
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage unique areas of development that traditional developers
9/20/2021 01:00 PM
would over look. We are
Screen Name Redacted
There are many successful models of subdivision development that
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
integrate single family, targeted housing (low-income, seniors etc.), and higher density housing such as apartments, townhouses and duplexes into a single plan of subdivision. Lots created by consent/severing rural lots rarely produce this kind of varied, yet integrated, community model. Concentrating new development under subdivision planning guidelines, rather than permitting and even encouraging piecemeal development through rural lot severances, will allow for better bylaw compliance, concentration of development in already existing settlement areas, and better support for community facilities and services.
Screen Name Redacted
reduce government red tape
9/21/2021 02:33 PM
Screen Name Redacted 9/24/2021 06:46 PM
Page 16 of 64
Make the permit process easier.
Page 123 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Through zoning for higher density housing (e.g.: townhomes,
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
multiplexes) in settlement areas.
Screen Name Redacted
Provide incentives like limited term tax abatements and fee
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
reductions to those who develop/modify properties that are SFT targeted housing like auxiliary units, affordable housing, apartment buildings, senior housing, and other affordable rental units.
Optional question (35 response(s), 30 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Q12
Where should higher-density housing be located, and how can it be integrated into
existing communities?
Screen Name Redacted
It should be located in areas where there are existing municipal
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
infrastructure (water, sanitary), in proximity to amenities (retail and services, parks), with careful consideration for impact on adjacent properties.
Screen Name Redacted
In or within existing towns boundaries. Allow simplify process for
8/24/2021 06:03 AM
tiny homes and granny suites/homes
Screen Name Redacted
Repurpose or use available vacant lots in the hamlets and villages
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
as areas to develop new housing that does not encroach on our forests and lakes that are under immense stress with current development practices, ie cutting down large swaths of forests to build private lanes and housing.
Screen Name Redacted
You need to avoid suburbia in SF. Build communities within
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
communities. Neighbourhoods with walkable amenities, a ‘main street’, where basic needs are within walking distance, and away from water ways, marshlands, wetlands and lakes. Do not allow building on prime farm land.
Screen Name Redacted
It should be located in or near villages. Expanding village
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
boundaries will help to ensure enough developable land. Municipal services such as water, sewer, new roads to open land locked parcels for development, sidewalks to connect the housing and development to current development are also required.
Page 17 of 64
Page 124 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
I existing communities but you need municiple water and sewer
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
services, sidewalks, libraries etc.
Screen Name Redacted
Does it matter where it’s located at this point? Finding the right
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
location could take years and lots of money trying to decide. Make a quick decision Buy property Buy modular homes Get people inside them The worry about transportation and what not shouldn’t be the focus it should be “how can we get people in dwellings as fast as possible”.
Screen Name Redacted
Within the village of Sydenham.
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Large waterfront lots left after severances shut down in 2000
8/31/2021 07:57 AM
should be allowed to sever by consent if the resulting lot fits the exceptionally conservative dimension parameters of the current official plan. People do not want to be crammed into tiny hamlets cheek by jowl. Why would the municipality want the extra strain on the infrastructure costs? People want, and have the financial means, to build on one of the many many waterfront property opportunities presented by allowing more waterfront severances. South Frontenac is blessed to have such a quantity of this resource, unlike many other municipalities. We should be responsibly developing this resource. If the property taxes I pay currently to South Frontenac are an example, the tax benefits to the municipality would be very rich indeed. Let us responsibly share our beautiful lakes with others!
Screen Name Redacted
There should be NO higher density housing, depending on the
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
meaning of the term. Duplexes, small apartment buildings, yes, but anything that does not fit into the present genre of life in our communities, no. Water, sewer, traffic and services have to be able to support higher density populations. Slow organic growth has always served us best.
Screen Name Redacted
Close to Hamlets to lessen the transportation burden, as well ease
8/31/2021 09:31 AM
access to local amenities
Screen Name Redacted
In areas with food, pharmacy, recreation, schools, libraries already
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
present.
Page 18 of 64
Page 125 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
In hamlets and villages
8/31/2021 12:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Allow property owners the opportunity to sever lands in both rural
8/31/2021 04:58 PM
and near village settings and expand current infrastructure
Screen Name Redacted
In existing hamlets
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted
It should be located where ever someone wants to buy a piece of
8/31/2021 07:30 PM
property and build. Why try and control where people want to purchase land and build.
Screen Name Redacted
I do not think that we should have higher density housing.
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
Screen Name Redacted
in the small towns
9/01/2021 03:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
villages
9/01/2021 05:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Higher density housing should be promoted in all greenfield
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
developments. Incentives through CIPs and other programs should be considered for converting vacant space into housing (or where appropriate commercial space) in settlement areas.
Screen Name Redacted
In existing communities. Build more facilities to support urban living
9/05/2021 07:43 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Near larger communities that have already facilities and
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
infrastructure to accommodate this. Sydenham
Screen Name Redacted
On secondary streets within settlement communities
9/06/2021 07:18 AM
Screen Name Redacted
It needs to be added into settlement areas only, with consideration
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
of adequate municipal servicing. Currently, Sydenham is the only
Page 19 of 64
Page 126 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 area with ANY level of servicing. Our geography (rock and clay soils) will soon become overwhelmed with septic systems the way that rural SFD “sprawl” has been allowed and we’ll see blue baby syndrome before too long which will leave us vulnerable and with no choice but to install sewers and water in areas.
Screen Name Redacted
Around existing villages where there are already services. Careful
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
impact assesments and appropriate improvements to infrastructure. Ensuring outdoor spaces where people can meet.
Screen Name Redacted
In existing communities. Additional services should be added to
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
affected towns.
Screen Name Redacted
It should be located where the market determines it to be
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
appropriate
Screen Name Redacted
Higher density housing should be located in village centers ideally
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
where retails and other services are available
Screen Name Redacted
Expand neighborhoods along highway 38 and lower speed limit for
9/13/2021 08:28 PM
more areas of it (Harrowsmith, Hartington, Verona)
Screen Name Redacted
The need for infrastructure is long overdue. This will support
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
growth.
Screen Name Redacted
In the core of the villages for easier access to grocery stores etc.
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
Screen Name Redacted
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not allow the removal of trees or
9/19/2021 09:17 AM
destruction of forests for any new homes. Our future depends on the health of our water systems and our forests in part. When a forest is built on, it is gone forever. Please please please do not allow forests to be damaged any more than has already occurred. They are vital.
Screen Name Redacted 9/20/2021 01:00 PM
Page 20 of 64
In villages existing foot print.
Page 127 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
See above - concentrating new development under plans of
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
subdivision in established settlement areas rather than defaulting to piecemeal development using severance of rural properties is the best way to ensure higher-density and targeted housing will be built, and that this housing will be integrated into existing communities.
Screen Name Redacted
urban areas. Install water and sewer
9/21/2021 02:33 PM
Screen Name Redacted
The joy of South Frontenac township is the rural community feel.
9/24/2021 06:46 PM
Please be cautious of creating too much high density housing in one area. Ensure the infrastructure is available before slowing high density.
Screen Name Redacted
In rural areas, allowing secondary units would cater to those who
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
seek to escape into the country. For higher density housing in settlement areas, zoning laws need to be ammended to allow for the construction of multi-unit dwellings.
Screen Name Redacted
In settlement areas. Also provide incentives like those listed in
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
response to #11 for those who modify, add to or build new affordable, senior or other affordable properties
Optional question (38 response(s), 27 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Page 21 of 64
Page 128 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q13
Should retail development be focused in settlement areas?
7 (11.7%) 7 (11.7%)
53 (88.3%) 53 (88.3%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (60 response(s), 5 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 22 of 64
Page 129 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q14
Should larger businesses (industrial and commercial) be directed to locate in settlement
areas?
25 (42.4%) 25 (42.4%)
34 (57.6%) 34 (57.6%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (59 response(s), 6 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 23 of 64
Page 130 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q15
Would you like to see the Township establish an area where light industrial uses can be
clustered?
7 (11.7%) 7 (11.7%)
53 (88.3%) 53 (88.3%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (60 response(s), 5 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 24 of 64
Page 131 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q16
Where should cannabis production and processing operations be directed in the
Township? Select all that apply.
45
40 40
35
30
25
20
15 14 15 11
10
5
Question options Rural areas
Prime agricultural areas
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 25 of 64
Industrial areas
Other (please specify)
Page 132 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q17
What factors do you think are important to regulate when cannabis production and
processing operations are located in the Township? Select all that apply.
55
48
50
46
45
42
41
40
35
29 30
25
20
15
9 10
5
Question options Separation distance from residential uses Noise
Water uses
Odour
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 26 of 64
Separation distance from schools, parks and community facilities (e.g. churches) Other (please specify)
Page 133 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q18
What infrastructure (water, sewage, roads, high speed internet, etc.) and services are
needed to support a diverse economy?
Screen Name Redacted
Reliable internet!
8/20/2021 08:40 AM
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet natural gas, and water
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
Screen Name Redacted
More provider options and better coverage for high speed internet.
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Decent roads with safe biking and inexpensive internet
8/24/2021 06:03 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Hwy 38 should be under provincial responsibility, reliable,
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
affordable Internet, manditory inspections of septic systems, a support system for private lanes.
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet
8/25/2021 10:46 AM
Screen Name Redacted
High Speed internet
8/25/2021 11:15 AM
Screen Name Redacted
we have all of the above, but you need to be better at controlling
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
the speed on the roads and the type of traffic on the roads (e.g. large transports going along country roads…too much load.
Screen Name Redacted
Water, sewage, new and well maintained existing roads, bike lanes
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
and paths, multi use facilities for all ages, support for commercial businesses, industrial business and options for housing within reason without having to change the zoning are important.
Screen Name Redacted
Internet
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted Page 27 of 64
HIGH SPEED INTERNET! All of the above. Adequate roadways to
Page 134 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 8/30/2021 07:30 AM
support trucks, shipping and overall increased traffic; increase availability of medical services;
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
Screen Name Redacted
All listed.
8/31/2021 07:46 AM
Screen Name Redacted
As you have indicated, infrastructure for a diverse economy must
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
include: water, sewage, grocery, retail and pharmacy services, road access and appropriate traffic flow to avoid congestion, high speed internet.
Screen Name Redacted
Definitely hardwire internet ie high speed cable, safer more secure
8/31/2021 09:31 AM
and reliable. Satellite internet is a poor bandaid at best, not reliable in most rural areas. Better road maintenance by our own roads dept. stop contracting away our jobs as you are sending our tax dollars out of our community. Invest local!!!’
Screen Name Redacted
Above plus good cell phone coverage, sidewalks,
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
landscaping/municipal beautification, fire 911 police located in 15 mins maximum
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet and better roads
8/31/2021 12:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
All noted above
8/31/2021 04:58 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Water and sewage
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted
I don’t see our tax base being high enough in the foreseeable
8/31/2021 07:30 PM
future to be able to create the proper infrastructure (water/sewer) to allow hamlet growth. We need to allow rural growth, increase the tax base, being more people to the community which will eventually allow larger infrastructure in existing Hamlets
Screen Name Redacted Page 28 of 64
RELIABLE high speed internet
Page 135 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 8/31/2021 09:51 PM
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet
9/01/2021 03:48 AM
Screen Name Redacted
I think some of our roads could be turned back to gravel on less
9/01/2021 05:49 PM
travelled roads. Less costly and slows down traffic.
Screen Name Redacted
All of the above. Primarily - High Speed Internet. Consider policies
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
that support innovative approaches from the private sector regarding water and sewage. Villages likely require a strategic approach to water/wastewater in order to maintain a density of commercial uses.
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet.
9/02/2021 01:05 PM
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet (currently unavailable to many rural properties)
9/03/2021 10:31 AM
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet and sewage/water facilities
9/05/2021 07:43 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Improve internet service. Road access, land and water already
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
available in Sydenham. Focus on this area to improve diverse economy.
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet to all residents
9/06/2021 07:18 AM
Screen Name Redacted
WATER AND SEWER. You cannot safely have communities
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
without considering the sanitation and public health requirements. South Frontenac has been irresponsibly allowing growth without servicing for too long and it is a matter of time before someone gets sick from contaminated water. Businesses also want reliable water and wastewater services, the groundwater in South Frontenac is unreliable and inconsistent and if a business needs water for processing they will look elsewhere to set up shop. The internet availability is also terrible here, but unfortunately I don’t think it’s a municipalities jurisdiction to provide as a service to residents or businesses.
Page 29 of 64
Page 136 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet plus remote working hubs with additional
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
business facilities, meeting space etc.Careful assessments re water needs/ sewage impacts (particularly re septic systems) Improved rural access to medical services, in particular GPs.
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet would enable businesses to better serve
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
residents and students to access more information faster.
Screen Name Redacted
All of the above.
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Much of South Frontenac lacks proper high speed internet access.
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
Xplornet is horrible and should never receive subsidies from any level of government.
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet is a driving factor and should be top level as
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
this is required for most businesses now. As well home uses for education and for entertainment require high speed internet now
Screen Name Redacted
Internet
9/13/2021 06:37 PM
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet. I personally know of families who really
9/13/2021 08:28 PM
struggled during the pandemic because their elementary school students do not have access to internet that could handle a Zoom call.
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet that has increased accessibility
9/14/2021 06:07 AM
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet is most critical
9/15/2021 11:04 AM
Screen Name Redacted
All of the above
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted 9/15/2021 01:04 PM
Page 30 of 64
Sewage, water and high speed internet.
Page 137 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet, utilities (natural gas), roads.
9/15/2021 01:05 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Reliable and affordable Internet.
9/19/2021 09:17 AM
Screen Name Redacted
All of the above
9/19/2021 08:01 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Internet
9/20/2021 01:00 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Encouraging, whenever possible, new development in existing
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
settlement areas under subdivision plans can help to limit the need for new roads and other infrastructure (such as electrical service), lower the cost of providing services such as garbage pick-up and recycling, and other similar benefits. It can also limit the need to have individual residences using wells and septic fields, which are inherently less efficient than community water and septic services. High-speed internet and better cellphone coverage in South Frontenac should now be considered basic infrastructure - like roads and electrical service - and thus available to all who want access to these services.
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet. good roads
9/21/2021 02:33 PM
Screen Name Redacted
high speed internet
9/24/2021 08:08 PM
Screen Name Redacted
I think it is important for customers and employees to be able to
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
get to and from places of business so roads are important for that purpose. High speed internet is also very important in today’s world as most businesses, in my opinion, have a lot to gain from ease of access to information via the internet.
Screen Name Redacted
#1 High Speed Internet. Subsidize Xplornet for their needed
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
upgrades or other wise incentivize their needs. A possible low dollar value charge to tax bills might make it tolerable for SFT, Xplornet and taxpayers
Page 31 of 64
Page 138 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet
9/29/2021 11:46 AM
Optional question (51 response(s), 14 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Q19
What additional policies, tools, and incentives should be introduced to support
diversifying economic development across the Township?
Screen Name Redacted
not sure
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Support for home based businesses.
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Promoting SF as safe, secure and equitable location. Ensuring that
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
the property rights of landowners through sound policy and by laws, better transparency for building permits.
Screen Name Redacted
I am not sure about this obsession with growth. if anything,
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
capitalize on your natural assets. Kingston is a good example of how not to do things. They are one of Ontario’s oldest cities, and stayed small for a long time, which should have allowed proper planning. Instead, they sold out to big developers, with high rises all along the waterfront, NO Lake access (in fact, you are lucky if you can even see it) sprawling, ugly suburban communities on prime farm land, all with cars (usually covering the streets rather than in their drives, all commuting (b/c no neighbourhood ‘main street’ and polluting like crazy. One small pathetic beach downtown, that cost millions to ‘revamp’ and it looks the same, and is still difficult to access.
Screen Name Redacted
All of the above
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Where’s the south Frontenac museum?
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Incentives and active recruitment for green industries (solar, wind,
8/30/2021 07:30 AM
small farms); focus on employment without compromising the
Page 32 of 64
Page 139 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 environment or productive farmland.
Screen Name Redacted
The overall ambience of the village. Large, noisy, manufacturing
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
would be detrimental. People live here to get away from city life.
Screen Name Redacted
Attracting and supporting new economic developments cannot
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
come at the expense of existing businesses, large, medium or small. Too many times small towns woo big corporations only to be abandoned in the future, leaving the town with empty hotels and housing, and smaller, supporting businesses failing. I cannot actually suggest policies other than attempts to build in assurances for longevity, if possible. Another suggestion is to deny any truly Big Players. Walmart, Lowes, even Canadian Tire. We don’t need them. We need to support our local businesses.
Screen Name Redacted
Green sourced energy incentives, proper waste management,
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
incentives for hiring local
Screen Name Redacted
Grants
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Continue to support independent farmers. Establish more local
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
abattoirs.
Screen Name Redacted
CIP programs are highly effective and can be modified every 3 -5
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
years to adjust or course correct. They could be used to support rezoning efforts by private parties in areas identified for commercial/industrial uses. Consider policies requiring fibre connections to building when built or to enable fibre connectivity when available. Invest in long-term transformation for the emerging demographic (not who you have but who you want to have or who you will have) Don’t build policies only for the existing aging population, who may have disposable income but may not engage in economic productivity.
Screen Name Redacted
Matching grants for start-ups.
9/02/2021 01:05 PM
Screen Name Redacted 9/05/2021 11:37 AM
Page 33 of 64
Anything
Page 140 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Pre-servicing and pre-zoning employment areas with a variety of
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
different lot sizes (eg. business parks)
Screen Name Redacted
Incentives for green initiatives, from house building/renovation to
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
green cars and boats.
Screen Name Redacted
The cottage rental industry provides numerous benefits to the
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
Township. Short term rentals rely heavily on the services of local handymen, cleaners, plumbers, electricians, builders, graders, farmers, student labour and more. The cottage industry also brings in tourists that support the local grocery store, restaurants, winery, gift shops, etc. Tools, policies and incentives that would enable the cottage rental industry to thrive and grow will yield positive outcomes for the Township.
Screen Name Redacted
Keep rural areas free of economic development.
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Economic development is best encouraged through low taxation
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
and less regulation – Nobody has to locate their business here.
Screen Name Redacted
Observe, monitor and control development of existing waterfront
9/13/2021 06:37 PM
campgrounds like Melody Lodge where waterfront is altered and septic systems are inadequate for the increase in the number of permanent campsites being added.
Screen Name Redacted
Infrastructure
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Don’t know.
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Pleaes prioritize climate protection and climate change concerns
9/19/2021 09:17 AM
and view this protection as “development” rather than buildings as development.
Screen Name Redacted 9/21/2021 02:33 PM
Page 34 of 64
reduce red tape for businesses to set up and grow
Page 141 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Consider supporting conservation easements for farms,
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
developments in historical or environmentally sensitive areas that are high priority community value assets. If it’s not already offered, offer potentially high employment commercial or industrial businesses a pro-rated initial property tax scheme. In New York State, a scheme called a"485B" offers an initial 0ne-time 50% tax reduction with the other 50% escalating by 5% a year. See: https://www.hselaw.com/news-and-information/in-the-news/2065real-estate-law-building-boon-485-b-program-offers-propertydevelopers-valuable-benefits
Optional question (26 response(s), 39 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Page 35 of 64
Page 142 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q20
What type of development should be allowed in waterfront areas? Select all that apply.
60 55 55
50
45
40
37
33
35
30
26 24
23
25
20
15
11
10
5
Question options Seasonal and permanent dwellings Public Access/Boat Launches
Marina Home occupations
Optional question (60 response(s), 5 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 36 of 64
Recreational commercial (e.g. resort, lodges, hotels) Home industries
Campgrounds
Page 143 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q21
Should the minimum lot size for a residential waterfront lot continue to be 2.5 acres and
300ft of water frontage?
13 (20.3%) 13 (20.3%)
37 (57.8%) 37 (57.8%)
14 (21.9%) 14 (21.9%)
Question options Yes
No, increase size and frontage requirements
Optional question (64 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 37 of 64
No, decrease size and frontage requirements
Page 144 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q22
Do you think that new non-waterfront lots within 300m of the lake should be permitted?
23 (37.1%) 23 (37.1%)
39 (62.9%) 39 (62.9%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 38 of 64
Page 145 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q23
Is it important to increase development setbacks to account for changing water levels
on the lakes?
19 (31.1%) 19 (31.1%)
42 (68.9%) 42 (68.9%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (61 response(s), 4 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 39 of 64
Page 146 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q24
Should it be a requirement of development approvals for owners to re-naturalize
shorelines where development is within 30m to the lake?
15 (24.6%) 15 (24.6%)
46 (75.4%) 46 (75.4%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (61 response(s), 4 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 40 of 64
Page 147 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q25
Do you think it is important to increase the protection of shorelines by regulating tree
cutting, vegetation removal, and site alteration within 30m of the lake?
20 (32.3%) 20 (32.3%)
42 (67.7%) 42 (67.7%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (62 response(s), 3 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 41 of 64
Page 148 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q26
How should the Township recognize that most of the Township is located within the
ecologically diverse Frontenac Arch Biosphere?
Screen Name Redacted
with public park space educating the public about the biological
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
diversity in the area
Screen Name Redacted
Provide more specific requirements for properties located in areas
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
identified as being important for environmental protection. Direct industrial uses into marginal lands.
Screen Name Redacted
When new builds occur, educate the builders and owners. Allow
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
protected corridors for wildlife to move.
Screen Name Redacted
Help farmers to contain runoff so it’s not contminatiing our lakes.
8/25/2021 11:15 AM
Many farmers are located on or close to our sensitive lakes with high quatities of fertilizer running into and causing problems with algae growth.
Screen Name Redacted
We seem to ignore this fact….development is unplanned and
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
sporadic. We are allowing small seasonal properties to become permanent homes. Not appropriate. We have no rules about naturalized waterfronts, light pollution (there is so much), noise pollution, development on waterfront properties (e.g. retaining walls, etc.)…and when non permitted activities are brought to the attention of the township, nothing is done.
Screen Name Redacted
Implement policies for those areas with sensitive species for future
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
development.
Screen Name Redacted
Protect habitats with well laid out restrictions and parameters that
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
are strictly policed and governed consistently and fairly no matter who you know
Screen Name Redacted
Have a Ecologically Diverse themed day or week in the schools.
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
I’m sure like me a lot them of have no idea what that is and a educational day on the subject yearly would be a good start
Page 42 of 64
Page 149 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
This should be clearly stated in the Plan and be reflected in rules
8/30/2021 07:30 AM
and regulations that effect local ecology.
Screen Name Redacted
Signage
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Additional protection measures for sensitive habitats.
8/31/2021 07:46 AM
Screen Name Redacted
As wonderful as it is to recognize we are mostly within the
8/31/2021 07:57 AM
Frontenac Arch Biosphere, this should not impede responsible waterfront development.
Screen Name Redacted
Even though the above questions do not allow for anything beyond
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
yes/no, there should be no more waterfront development unless frontages are increased. BUT…if frontages are increased, only the very rich will be able to purchase such frontages and “Monster Mansions” will be built, each one with multiple bathrooms, multiple motor boats, etc., taxing the delicate ecosystem and groundwater systems even more. The best way for the Township to accept its position within the FAB is to disallow any future waterfront developments. Once built, it’s too late.
Screen Name Redacted
Protect it
8/31/2021 09:31 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Have conservation staff go to schools, regular emailings to
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
residents each describing a different feature of the history, nature, environment of the Arch
Screen Name Redacted
Enforce compliance of shoreline preservation
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted
By valuing this asset snd maintaining it. Any township can have
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
industry or housing developments, but only this township has this diverse ecology
Screen Name Redacted
Policies should be in place in the OP to preserve natural features
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
of the biosphere. This might include preserving landscapes or views associated with or that best demonstrate the FAB.
Page 43 of 64
Page 150 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
greater ties with the Frontenac Arch Biosphere group. Promotion of
9/02/2021 01:05 PM
events and opportunities for volunteering to clean-up, purchase land, etc.
Screen Name Redacted
Public education programs
9/05/2021 07:43 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Inform residents and support “Friends of the FAB”.
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Provide stronger bylaws for zoning and site plan control for areas
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
of concern.
Screen Name Redacted
Information to all new home owners on responsible stewardship of
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
land and shoreline, including FAQ type information - e.g. what to do if you have phragmites on your land; lake health; well and septic system health and maintainance. Strong links with Lake Associations and other similar community organisations, as well as the larger organizations like FOCA, Watersheds Canada, etc.
Screen Name Redacted
There should be interpretive signage in key areas providing
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
information about the Frontenac Arch Biosphere. This will help residents and visitors to develop an appreciation for the Biosphere. Sensitive areas should be off limits to development. I have only come across one website dedicated to the FAB, but it is not very effective at communicating key messages, either in text or visually.
Screen Name Redacted
By protecting shorelines and water quality; by monitoring nutrient
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
and pollution levels in Township lakes and especially by ensuring that farm fertilizer runoffs are kept out of the water.
Screen Name Redacted
It should not recognize it any particular way.
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
Screen Name Redacted
It should be recognized and celebrated but it must be balanced
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
with development
Screen Name Redacted
Ensure any development will not diminish biosphere, habitat or
Page 44 of 64
Page 151 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 9/14/2021 06:07 AM
wildlife who live there
Screen Name Redacted
The OP should include policies to ensure that the values for which
9/15/2021 11:04 AM
the area was designated a biosphere reserve are recognized and protected for future generations. The same applies to the lands adjacent to Dog and Cranberry lakes which form part of the Rideau Canal world heritage site.
Screen Name Redacted
Allow for development with strict policy
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Add conservation areas within the Frontenac Arch Biosphere for
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
the wildlife so that they have movement corridors. Also set aside waterfront for wildlife and for people to gain some appreciation of their habitat.
Screen Name Redacted
Do not allow any more development along lakes and forests.
9/19/2021 09:17 AM
Support naturalization projects - and support finding funding sources for those who care about these projects to be able to complete them.
Screen Name Redacted
Develop data on the area that can be sold back to developers.
9/20/2021 01:00 PM
Screen Name Redacted
It should make environmental protection and sustainable
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
development a key planning principle in all development plans and applications. New development should be concentrated in settlement areas and not encouraged to occur in a piecemeal fashion in rural and waterfront areas. The township can also work actively to protect Crown and other public lands, ensure new development meets high environmental standards, establish programs to restore/renaturalize shorelines, etc.
Screen Name Redacted
Creating awareness through signage and protection of natural
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
areas.
Screen Name Redacted
Understand what the Biosphere’s largest threats are and develop
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
policies directed at enforcing the needed prohibitions and preventative measures. Consider too that SFT has the other UNESCO site, the Rideau Canal, passing through our lakes and
Page 45 of 64
Page 152 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 rivers and also apply preventive measures and prohibitions to support the Canal.
Optional question (36 response(s), 29 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Q27
How can the Township support mitigation (i.e., actions to limit global warming and its
related effects) and adaptation (i.e., adjusting to impacts from the changing climate) to climate change in the Official Plan?
Screen Name Redacted
The Township could buy electric vehicles instead of gas vehicles.
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Prohibit the use of Class 1 and 2 Soil and Prime Agricultural lands
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
for non-agricultural purposes (e.g. new residential or commercial lot creation) to ensure that we have a feasible local food supply and agricultural economy. Encourage denser forms of development within settlement areas. Increase areas identified as environmentally protected. Require additional processes, with clear requirements, for sensitive areas.
Screen Name Redacted
Try and reduce mileage on gas vehicles…..
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Lot sizes must be made larger to accommodate on site wastewater
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
treatment, and appropriate use of groundwater resources, the volume of which is dwindling. Light pollution must be kept to a minimum. We are flooding our skies with artificial light–no different than dumping our sewage in a lake or ditch…we need to regard it as pollution. We keep allowing growth, without regard for the environment, with acknowledging the climate crisis. It is a shame. We also need to purchase land when sold and maintain or return it to its natural state…we need green belts (ones that Ford can’t overturn, or any future bloated politician). Light pollution is a very serious issue. We also need wildlife corridors, and we must consider where and how we build with these in mind.
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage development to protect natural resources and
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
encourage vegetation. Make villages and commercial development accessible by sidewalks and bike lanes and paths.
Page 46 of 64
Page 153 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Promoting bike lanes, carpooling, trails, public transit if we get to
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
that point, continue setbacks from lakes, lot sizes to ensure no overcrowding that can be detrimental to water Supply drainage etc.
Screen Name Redacted
We can’t do but much besides just doing out part
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Actively promote net-zero (or similar) construction, green
8/30/2021 07:30 AM
businesses, etc.; be proactive in monitoring / regulating farming & natural resource extraction practices (ie, fertilizer runoff, logging, sand/gravel, etc); consider extreme weather in developing guidelines (blizzard, icestorm, heavy rains, drought, fire, etc)
Screen Name Redacted
Education, community awareness, forgiveness days to take items
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
to the dump so people can’t safely dispose of items. Beef up inspectors to educate and work with farmers for best practices.
Screen Name Redacted
Support green technology. Protect shore lands, e.g. naturalize a
8/31/2021 07:46 AM
percentage on developed lots.
Screen Name Redacted
get rid of gasoline pumps and replace with electric vehicle charging
8/31/2021 07:57 AM
stations.
Screen Name Redacted
This is the most important question of all. Sadly, it directly
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
contradicts the Township’s seeming desire to increase high density housing, increase large industrial and commercial presence and increase waterfront development. Limiting global warming is only accomplished by limiting its driving forces namely: population, pollution, expansion, industrialization, and commercialization. The more urban we become, the more we contribute to climate change. We have the opportunity to do the opposite - build green spaces, protect existing green spaces, reduce waste and pollution, and avoid greenhouse gas emission producing activities. It is a challenge of our times and the responsibility of our times. There are answers, but they are hard answers that few wish to hear.
Screen Name Redacted
Stop allowing the bending of rules from those with deep pockets,
8/31/2021 09:31 AM
protect our township for our children . Set the standard and live by it.
Page 47 of 64
Page 154 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Approval ‘points’ for environmentally sound buildings, add carbon
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
tax component to property taxes, new vehicle purchases limited to lowest emissions vehicles possible
Screen Name Redacted
Tree planting initiatives
8/31/2021 12:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Climate change does not directly affect our local small lakes
8/31/2021 04:58 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Increase monitoring of lake water quality and implement controls if
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
quality is deteriorating
Screen Name Redacted
Ensure any new project or development has a carbon neutral
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
footprint
Screen Name Redacted
It is important that the farmers and other businesses are
9/01/2021 06:47 AM
responsible for their runoff into the lakes. some sort of filtration where the runoff can be filtered would be great.
Screen Name Redacted
So many places to start as part of the framework. You could look at
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
FCM’s Guidebook: https://www.pcp-ppc.ca/resources/guideclimate-action-in-small-and-rural-communities If you want something more overarching, you could commit to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (of course that is more than climate action) – Support for sustainable building practices (possibly also incentivized via CIP) could be useful in an OP, but even a commitment to work with conservation and farmland preservation groups to retain naturalized lands as a balance to the pursuit of housing and commercial/industrial lands may be ideal. Perhaps the OP can add protections to certain eco systems or lands.
Screen Name Redacted
Do more to encourage composting and reduction of waste. Offer
9/02/2021 01:05 PM
incentives for energy-saving product purchase and use where no other national/provincial incentives exist. Add solar power to municipal buildings where viable. Tree planting incentives/initiatives. Organize community events (akin to Earth Day).
Page 48 of 64
Page 155 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Separate and identifiable funding programs
9/05/2021 07:43 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Identify flooding issues/areas and make mitigation plan. No
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
building in these areas. Identify possible storage areas for excessive rainfall (with Conservation areas). Promotion of Electric Cars (lead by example and buy E-vehicle for SF fleet. Promote use of solar panels, etc.
Screen Name Redacted
High speed internet will allow for more working from home,
9/06/2021 07:18 AM
reducing commuting. Intensifying population density in communities. Protecting green space and shoreline development to keep vibrant ecosystems.
Screen Name Redacted
Ensuring settlement areas are buffered from flood plains and other
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
areas of risk (wildfire, karst topography, etc). Control unsustainable growth (1000’s of houses each with their own individual well).
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage and incentivize best practice, increase building
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
standards requirements.
Screen Name Redacted
All private and commercial landowners should be provided with an
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
incentive to plant more trees on their property – this would help increase the overall canopy, provide habitat for wildlife and help reduce local temperatures.
Screen Name Redacted
Increase development setbacks from the lakes; regulate allowable
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
nutrient and pollution levels in the lakes to mitigate blue-green algae blooms; regulate shoreline vegetation plantings and the planting of trees on mowed properties.
Screen Name Redacted
The township should let higher levels of government deal with
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
issues that are out of the township’s jurisdiction. Climate and environment are provincial responsibilities.
Screen Name Redacted
Require new construction to meet specific energy requirements,
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
give preference for use of renewable energy sources like solar on new building permits, by reducing fees or streamlining approvals
Page 49 of 64
Page 156 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Limit industry or have strict restrictions ensuring no or limited
9/14/2021 06:07 AM
pollutants.
Screen Name Redacted
consult with the CRCA to identify lands that may be subject to
9/15/2021 11:04 AM
flooding or damage from increased high intensity rainfall events as a result of climate change. Land use policies may have to be included to reflect the need to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts.
Screen Name Redacted
Integrated green spaces in community development.
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Value our forests more by regulating how many trees (which take
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
up carbon); can be removed from a property. Encourage construction that is energy efficient and outfitted with green technology, grey water usage etc.
Screen Name Redacted
Do not allow any more destruction of forests, and protect lakes and
9/19/2021 09:17 AM
waterways. Be courageous in not making everything about money is a short-sighted way. Be a leader in protecting the precious lands we have here.
Screen Name Redacted
Ensure that Township vehicles are low or zero emission,
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
encourage new developments to include fast charge stations for electric vehicles, require new housing to be wired to accommodate rechargeable electric vehicles which will become mandatory within a decade, invest in recycling services, the list goes on and on….
Screen Name Redacted
Create incentives/amend laws to push for reduction of carbon
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
footprints of dwellings in the township. For example, creating incentives for the installation of cold weather heat pumps instead of fossil fuel burning furnaces.
Screen Name Redacted
SFT’s greatest asset that is seriously threatened by global warming
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
is our 75 lakes. The lakes suffer from increased bluegreen algae blooms, increase water temperatures and higher water levels. These threats deserve the highest level of attention by SFT because without the lakes, the Township will shrivel and die. Create a new SFT agency linked to the Eco Systems committee explicitly focused on bringing all the lake associations together covering all 75 SFT lakes for developing a comprehensive plan
Page 50 of 64
Page 157 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 and implementation action plan that will “Protect, improve or restore water quality” as stated in the Ontario Provincial Plan. Have this be a regular public progress reporting requirement at quarterly SFT Council meetings.
Optional question (38 response(s), 27 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Page 51 of 64
Page 158 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q28
Based on agricultural activities in the area, what is the most appropriate lot size for
farms? Select all that apply.
30
28
28
26
24 21
22 19
20
18
18
16
14
12
12
10
8
6
4
2
Question options More than 100 acres.
100 acres
Optional question (53 response(s), 12 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 52 of 64
85 acres
75 acres
Less than 75 acres
Page 159 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q29
Should the Township consider expanding the prime agricultural area designated in the
current Official Plan to incorporate farmlands with lower productivity ratings (Class 4-7) where there is a concentration of farms?
12 (24.0%) 12 (24.0%)
38 (76.0%) 38 (76.0%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (50 response(s), 15 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 53 of 64
Page 160 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 54 of 64
Page 161 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q30
What types of on-farm diversified uses and agri-tourism uses should be considered to
be permitted on farms in prime agricultural areas? Select all that apply.
55
52 50
50 45
45
43
45
43 40 38
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Question options Home occupations (e.g. hairdresser, art studio)
Home industries (e.g. woodworking shop)
Overnight tourist accommodation (e.g. bed and breakfast)
Recreational uses (e.g. horse trails, corn maze)
Uses that provide value-added agricultural products (e.g. cheese factory, bakery) Retail Uses (e.g. tack shop, farm market)
Optional question (57 response(s), 8 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 55 of 64
Veterinary clinics
Food service (e.g. cafe, ice cream shop)
Page 162 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q31
Should minimum distance separation (MDS) apply to on-farm diversified uses and agri-
tourism uses?
23 (42.6%) 23 (42.6%)
31 (57.4%) 31 (57.4%)
Question options Yes
No
Optional question (54 response(s), 11 skipped) Question type: Radio Button Question
Page 56 of 64
Page 163 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q32
What factors should be considered in order to ensure on-farm diversified uses and agri-
tourism uses are compatible in prime agricultural and rural areas?
50
44 45
38
40
35
35
33
35
30
29
30 26
25 20 20
15
10 5 5
Question options Size and scale
Separation distances
Appearance of buildings
Entrances
Other (please specify)
Optional question (56 response(s), 9 skipped) Question type: Checkbox Question
Page 57 of 64
Landscaping/fencing Parking and loading
Drainage and grading Emergency vehicle access
Lighting
Page 164 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Q33
How can we increase access to local food in the Township?
Screen Name Redacted
promote a farmers market
8/21/2021 10:54 AM
Screen Name Redacted
- Don’t support the loss of farmland for residential lots. 2) Support
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
local farmers and their efforts for diversified on-farm businesses. 3) Increase mixed use buildings in settlement areas that would be more likely to provide local products to a population within a walking distance
Screen Name Redacted
Additional abattoirs. Recognizing that our growing season is 4
8/24/2021 08:10 AM
months, this is already done through farmers markets, local farmers and buy Ontario.
Screen Name Redacted
Community gardens
8/25/2021 10:46 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Local farmer markets.
8/25/2021 11:15 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Enable young farmers to buy and start family farms.
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Promote the ability for farm stands and farmers markets.
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Farm stands permitted, township government local Markets, more
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
programs such as open farms
Screen Name Redacted
We’re good on this
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted
A real, centralized farmer’s market! More distribution to local
8/30/2021 07:30 AM
groceries and small markets; partnerships w foodbanks, senior homes, schools, meals on wheels, etc.
Screen Name Redacted Page 58 of 64
Allow smaller farms to produce and sell goods on site. Foodland
Page 165 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021 8/30/2021 11:48 AM
does not allow for locally produced goods to be sold in store.
Screen Name Redacted
Increase weekly farmers market locations. Why is there none in the
8/31/2021 07:57 AM
village of Sydenham?
Screen Name Redacted
There seems to already exist significant access to local food in the
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
Township.
Screen Name Redacted
Set up proper farmers market with appropriate surface for covered
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
stalls in municipal area eg Park, school parking lot, for food crafts
Screen Name Redacted
Allow for commercial retail and promote buying local
8/31/2021 04:58 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Provide incentives to new businesses
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Indoor market with permanent stalls
8/31/2021 09:51 PM
Screen Name Redacted
support abbatoires
9/01/2021 05:49 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Expand on-farm diversified uses, do not have minimum sizes for
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
farms (market gardens can be produced on small plots of land), provide direct support to farmers markets, support on farm processing, mobile processing, allow local food providers to have on-farm diversified uses
Screen Name Redacted
Provide locations for farmers’ markets. eg. municipal parking lots.
9/02/2021 01:05 PM
Screen Name Redacted
More farmers markets public education programs
9/05/2021 07:43 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Promotion including activities such as: farmer markets, open farms,
9/05/2021 11:37 AM
etc.
Page 59 of 64
Page 166 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Community Farmer’s markets, roadside stands with website listing
9/06/2021 07:18 AM
who is producing/selling what, agreements with local grocery stores with defined sections in stores for local food
Screen Name Redacted
Stop allowing seemingly unlimited severances which have
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
minimized lot sizes so much that new farmers are unable to purchase enough decent agricultural land to start farming!!! So much valuable land has been divided up for SFD with huge septic systems.
Screen Name Redacted
Local producers listing on Topwnship website. FB focus on local
9/07/2021 10:42 AM
producers.
Screen Name Redacted
The Township could plant fruit trees in parks. Establish volunteer-
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
run community gardens.
Screen Name Redacted
Have local food featured in local groceries; have a large weekly or
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
bi-weekly farmers’ market, as is currently being done in Kingston.
Screen Name Redacted
This should not be the township’s concern.
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
Screen Name Redacted
By allowing smaller scale farming operations and local food
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
production that will provide more local food operations on small scale
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage farm markets with reasonable pricing
9/14/2021 06:07 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Include policies that explicitly encourage the establishment of small
9/15/2021 11:04 AM
scale market garden operations and allow the establishment of on site retail facilities to sell to the public.
Screen Name Redacted
Economic Development Marketing
9/15/2021 12:25 PM
Screen Name Redacted 9/15/2021 01:04 PM
Page 60 of 64
Farmers markets
Page 167 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Small business loans
9/20/2021 01:00 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage farm markets and local sourcing of food by restaurants,
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
grocery stores, consumers, etc. We make a point of trying to purchase fruits and vegetables from local suppliers whenever possible, as do many of our neighbours.
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage more farmers to produce local.
9/24/2021 06:46 PM
Screen Name Redacted
better supported, centralized farmers market
9/25/2021 05:57 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Farmers markets and roadside stands.
9/25/2021 07:48 PM
Screen Name Redacted
We really don’t need to. THere’s not the demand for a large scale
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
retail operation, and the number of residnets don’t command an increse.
Screen Name Redacted
Provide funding for a local Abattoir
9/29/2021 11:46 AM
Optional question (40 response(s), 25 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Q34
How can we make it easier for farmers to add more value to their food production
practices?
Screen Name Redacted
Support farmers by not allowing residential land speculation / lot
8/22/2021 09:24 PM
creation on Rural designated lands to erode the land that they need to support their operations - which forces them to deal with complaints from neighbours and go further afield to meet their own feed requirements, reducing the viability of their businesses.
Screen Name Redacted 8/24/2021 08:10 AM
Page 61 of 64
Additional abattoirs.
Page 168 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage practices that are compatible with the UN Sustainable
8/25/2021 02:55 PM
Development Goals and the climate action plan. Encourage plant based agriculture (more food/hectare/gallon of water/etc. – e.g. cattle drink excessive amounts of water, and eat excessive amounts of feed for the return on them as a food product.) Plant based farming is also a non violent practice, like farming animals for food.
Screen Name Redacted
Allow expansion, allow for food stands, farmers markets. Host
8/26/2021 07:15 AM
more events such as open farms.
Screen Name Redacted
Education, more township promotion of these
8/26/2021 05:18 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Support them
8/27/2021 05:41 AM
Screen Name Redacted
SFT needs a local abattoir for processing meat. Allowing small
8/30/2021 11:48 AM
farms to process their goods and sell on site.
Screen Name Redacted
Farms who wish to, already offer “made-on-site” products along
8/31/2021 08:53 AM
with Farm Gate Stores, CSA boxes, etc. What is lacking is any type of financial support, provincially or federally, to bring small farm incomes up to any reasonable standard. A cash crop farmer with 1000 acres of soybeans (which brings nothing to the local food market) makes a fortune but the mixed farm offering a variety of produce and marketable items eeks out an existence of under $35,000 a year, for which they work 10 hours a day, 300 days of the year. It is mind-boggling that a massage costs $100 an hour and a dozen free range, farm fresh eggs costs $4. Let’s see…that’s 25 dozen eggs for one massage. Such a huge disconnect here!
Screen Name Redacted
Help with advertising for local, organic, free range producers
8/31/2021 11:25 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Allow easier access to these foods for the average resident
8/31/2021 07:15 PM
Screen Name Redacted 8/31/2021 09:51 PM
Page 62 of 64
Training & financial support
Page 169 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Markets
9/01/2021 06:47 AM
Screen Name Redacted
Many would say food hub, I say make it easy for farmers to
9/02/2021 11:56 AM
process their own products with industrial uses on farm - but also for them to allow others to use their commercial kitchen as well (so the diversified use can be for farm products in general not just products from a single farm). Policies that support collaborative efforts through farmers are very very frontenac.
Screen Name Redacted
Reduce approvals required for on-farm diversified use. Perhaps if it
9/07/2021 10:02 AM
is <25% of a buildings gross area it can be exempt from site plan control etc. Allow market stands as of right on prime agricultural land.
Screen Name Redacted
Publish a list of farmers and their product/capability and connect
9/07/2021 02:29 PM
these with people willing to create start ups
Screen Name Redacted
Allow retail uses like cafes, bakeries, etc.
9/13/2021 12:11 PM
Screen Name Redacted
By keeping taxes and regulation as low as possible.
9/13/2021 12:50 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Create more information around farm based sales and having the
9/13/2021 01:00 PM
smaller farming units qualify to create diverse local foods
Screen Name Redacted
Do you publicize harvest news about farm products in the S.
9/15/2021 01:04 PM
Frontenac newsletter?
Screen Name Redacted
Government subsides
9/19/2021 08:01 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Expand and develop local. Markets.
9/20/2021 01:00 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Encourage farmers to sell through farm markets and stands, and to
9/21/2021 07:03 AM
expand their product ranges by also selling locally processed foods (maple syrup, jam, etc.)
Page 63 of 64
Page 170 of 264 Official Plan Open House Poll Questions : Survey Report for 12 January 2021 to 25 October 2021
Screen Name Redacted
Provide incentives
9/24/2021 06:46 PM
Screen Name Redacted
Engage the Farmer’s Union to help develop training programs for
9/26/2021 03:30 PM
farmers and interested youg peole in understanding what such best practices are, and helping work toward accomplishing them.
Optional question (24 response(s), 41 skipped) Question type: Essay Question
Page 64 of 64
Page 171 of 264 Township of South Frontenac New Official Plan Policy Directions Report
November 2021
Appendix B5 – Fall 2019 Engagement Report
84
Page 172 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AGENDA DATE:
January 21, 2020
REPORT DATE:
January 16, 2020
SUBJECT:
South Frontenac Official Plan Summary of Visioning Open Houses & On-line Survey
RECOMMENDATION: THAT the South Frontenac Council receive the report summarizing the results of the Official Plan Open Houses & On-line Survey for information. BACKGROUND: This report was presented to the Development Services Committee at the November 25, 2019 meeting. Development Services Committee recommended this information be presented to Committee of the Whole. Open House Results Three visioning open houses were held through September/October 2019 to gain public input into setting a vision for the new South Frontenac Official Plan. 125 members of the public provided input into creating a vision for South Frontenac by attending the Open Houses hosted by the Township. The results of the 3 Open Houses are totaled and summarized below. Board 1 - What do you love about South Frontenac? The first board asked people to put down in words what they loved about South Frontenac. The following word cloud identifies what open house participants said they love about South Frontenac. The size of the words indicates how often the word was said (bigger = more frequent).
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 173 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Board 2 – Where should growth happen in the Township? Over the 3 Open Houses a total of 119 stickers were placed on Board 2. Participates were able to vote for when they felt growth should occur in the Township. The majority (71%) of open house participants felt that growth should occur in the villages and hamlets. Participants indicated a lesser percentage of growth should occur in the rural area (21%) and indicated that waterfront areas should see the least growth (8%).
Where should growth happen in the Township? Waterfront 8%
Rural Area 20%
Villages & Hamlets 72%
There were several comments made indicating that growth should be directed away from good quality agricultural land and be of a size and scale compatible with a rural community. Comments were also made about the importance of sustainable waterfront development. There was the suggestion to direct mixed uses such as residential and commercial into hamlets and to increase opportunity for transit within the Township. Both were noted to assist with allowing seniors to age in place and attract young people. There was interest at all three open houses about the need to explore new forms of servicing (communal, sewer/municipal water) to be able to create a variety of housing types to facilitate growth occurring in villages/hamlets. Board 3 – What challenges does the Township need to overcome in the next 20 years? Participants were able to put as many post-it notes on the boards as they wished to identify challenges the Township needs to overcome in the next 20 years. Of all the boards, participants provided the most responses on Board 3. A range of challenges were identified. The below points summarizes the major challenges identified by participants:
It was identified that agricultural practices will be challenged because of the amount of rural residential development that has occurred. Agriculture is challenged to meet the minimum distance separation distances in order to expand because of the number and close proximity of houses. There is a desire for agricultural lands to be protected.
Seniors housing was one of the most clearly articulated challenges facing South Frontenac. It was identified that there is a shortage of suitable and Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 174 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
affordable housing options for seniors to age in place in South Frontenac. Individuals saw the villages as a place where senior supported living could occur. There was also interest in permitting second residential units in rural areas so that aging parents could live with their children.
Balancing the protection of the natural environment and species at risk was a major challenge that was identified. There is a recognition that the natural assets that make South Frontenac an amazing place to live in and visit are also some of the most fragile to protect. The need to protect wetlands, forests, endangered species, protect parks and green space are all things that are valued by the community.
There were numerous responses that that there is a need to improve rural internet connectivity. This was identified as a challenge that needs to be addressed over the next 20 year period.
Road maintenance and traffic control were also both identified as a challenge for the Township.
There were some responses that development in South Frontenac is challenged by a lack of municipal sewer and water services.
Transportation was identified as a challenge, especially for seniors. There was a need expressed for transportation services to connect the hamlets and to connect to Kingston.
Concerns were expressed about water quantity and quality through the Township for development and protection of property values on the lakes. Concerns were also expressed about how water levels are controlled and their impact on shoreline erosion.
South Frontenac is challenged by unplanned strip development. It was identified that growth and development must be managed and that there needs to be areas where development can meet the needs for the forecasted population growth the Township is expected to have. Comments included creating a more sustainable Township where commercial, industrial and recreational opportunities were available in the Township so the need to commute to Kingston to access services would be reduced. Overwhelmingly comments support directing more growth and development to the hamlets to meet multiple needs of the community.
There was a need expressed for the Township to pursue economic development initiatives to create viable community with an increase in the non-residential tax base. Comments included supporting tourism and generating jobs within the Township.
A clear challenge that was identifies is the need to build a strong, defendable Official Plan that balances growth with the protection of Natural Environment features that can be upheld if challenged at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.
Comments included the need for septic inspections to occur in the future, as well as the need to protect lakes and shore erosion through establishing a tree cutting by-law around the lakes. The challenge of enforcing a plan and Township by-laws were identified. There is a public expectation that once we have a plan, it will be enforced. Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 175 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Board 4 – What do you feel are the top issues that need to be address in a new Official Plan for South Frontenac? The results of board 4 are illustrated in the graph below. Participants were able to vote for the issues that they felt were most important to address as part of the development of a new Official Plan.
Board 4: Top Issues to be Addressed in the Official Plan Other 6%
Agriculture 8%
Water Quality 13% Environment 18% Rural Character 8%
Quality of Life 6%
Economy (Commercial & Industrial) 13%
Lakes & Rivers 8% Housing 7%
Heritage 3%
Growth 10%
Board 5 – What do you want South Frontenac to look like in 20 years? Participants were able to put an unlimited number of post-it notes with responses to the question. Below is a summary of responses received:
Growth should be managed with stricter controls and directed to settlement areas with servicing South Frontenac is a great place to raise a family Focused development of hamlets strengthening economy and social fabric of community as a whole The rural character of South Frontenac is maintained There are controls on waterfront development so South Frontenac doesn’t end up looking like Muskoka/Kawarthas There is a high standard of environment protection for features such as wetlands and ANSIs. Green technology and alternative transportation options are implemented to reduce the carbon foot print and help with climate change. Hamlets are invested in and are a source of local services and employment Recreation facilities are available to meet the community’s need in South Frontenac
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 176 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On-line Survey The Township received 129 completed surveys. The following graph illustrates the age category of those who responded to the survey. The largest demographic category was completed by individuals under 18 years of age. It is wonderful to have had this type of participation by some of our youngest Township residents. This is demographic was not reflected in the attendance at the public open houses. It is valuable to have the perspective of this demographic included in the survey results.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 177 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The majority of survey participants are permanent residents of South Frontenac. The majority of participants live on rural residential properties. 84.5% of participants live on waterfront properties with the balance of participants living on either farm properties or in villages/hamlets within the Township.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 178 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The top 5 topics identified in the on-line survey that participants are interested in discussing in the new Official Plan are:
- Natural Environment
- Climate Change
- Water Quantity and Quality
- State of the Lakes
- Affordable Housing Growth management, aging in place and residential development were also areas of interest.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 179 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Themes Identified in Responses to Survey Questions The responses provided to the survey questions are attached for information. The below bullet points outline a summary of themes that have come from the on-line survey responses:
Direct growth to settlement areas Protect agricultural land Protect water quality and quantity across the Township Lakes need to protected by putting controls on development Keep South Frontenac green It is important to protect the natural environment Preserve natural assets, biodiversity and natural heritage features Embrace green technology and prepare for climate change The focus should be sustainable growth that can foster local business to create jobs and provide local services Affordable housing is important to meet the needs of all population. Control un-planned development while maintaining the rural feel of the Township. Engage citizens in planning for the community through surveys, open houses, social media and direct emails. Plan for everyone – not just the loudest voices Public consultation is important. Ensure there is time for meaningful public engagement.
Residents of South Frontenac want multiple forms of communication in order to participate in the development of an Official Plan, including: o Email o Social media o Newsletters o Newpapers o Open Houses o Surveys o Webpage o Focus groups/stakeholder meetings
Residents look to the following sources for information: o Frontenac News o Newsletter in the Tax Bill o Township website o Word of mouth
FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: The Official Plan Update & Growth Management Study are already budgeted items in the approved 2019 budget and proposed to continue into the 2020 Budget year. Watsons & Associates has been engaged to prepare the population projections to support the Growth Management Study.
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 180 of 264
REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NEXT STEPS
- Release the RFP to engage planning consultants to assist with the preparation of the new Official Plan and Growth Management Background study.
- Obtain the results of the population projections being prepared by Watson & Associates. It is anticipated that results will be available in March 2020. This is foundational information to support a growth management background study. ATTACHMENTS:
Summary of the Official Plan Visioning Open House Participation Boards South Frontenac 2040 Official Plan Visioning On-line Survey Results
Submitted by: Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services
Approved by: Neil Carbone, CAO
Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive Rural Leader
Page 181 of 264 Minutes of Heritage Committee May, 20, 2021 Time: 10:30 AM Location: Council Chambers Heritage Committee
Present: Wilma Kenny, Brad Barbeau, Michael Gemmell, John McDougall, Councillor Pat Barr. Absent: Travis Rivard, Mark Millar, Stephanie Soto Gordon. Staff: Anna Geladi, Planner. 1.
Call to Order
a)
The meeting was called to order at 10:34 am.
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
a)
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
Approval of Minutes
a)
Minutes of the April 1, 2021 Meeting The minutes of the April 1, 2021 meeting were adopted as presented. Resolution No. 2021-Heritage-05/20-01 Moved by John McDougall Seconded by Wilma Kenny THAT the minutes of the April 1, 2021 meeting were adopted as presented. Carried
Business Arising from the Minutes
a)
Changes to Bill 108 - update after meeting with Ontario Heritage Trust (Anna) Anna Geladi explained that she spoke with a representative from Ontario Heritage Trust, and they indicated that they currently do not have any guidance on when the changes under Bill 108 will happen. She explained that the main change would be the addition of a formal notification process in order to list properties. Anna Geladi encouraged the Committee to review their list of culturally and historically significant properties of interest to determine if there are any the Committee would like to formally list before the new Bill 108 regulations come into effect. She explained that listing these properties would not protect the building, it would only require the owner to give notice that they plan to demolish. The Committee decided they would review identified properties and determine if there are properties that should be formally listed. Wilma Kenny inquired about the previously designated properties within the Township. Anna Geladi explained that there are in fact six (6) previously designated properties and they would be listed on the Township’s website shortly. The Committee discussed sending out letters to each of these
Page 182 of 264 Minutes of Heritage Committee May, 20, 2021 properties, as some members felt current owners may not know that their property is designated, or the specific elements that are designated within the bylaw. They also discussed reviewing the designations to ensure there were no gaps in the elements designated. Brad Barbeau inquired about Heritage Permits for building alterations. Anna Geladi explained that they are in the process of developing a permit for use. b)
Heritage Application Feedback Brad Barbeau provided feedback on his experience during the process. He thought the process was straightforward and the application was well done. The rest of the Committee had no additional comments on the application.
c)
Update on Brad’s Application for Heritage Designation Brad Barbeau provided an update on the status of his heritage designation to the Committee, noting that all documents with the municipality had been finalized.
d)
Bellrock Community Hall School Bell Cupola Inquiry Update (John) John McDougall provided an update on the status of Bellrock Community Hall/former School House. He noted that the Bellrock Community Hall Committee members were looking to see if there were any financial support grant options available related to heritage upgrades. He noted that Anna Geladi provided the caretakers of the hall with contact information related to getting repair estimates for the building. The Chair asked that John McDougall report back at the next meeting with any updates.
e)
Research for Barn - any volunteers? The Chair noted that a letter was sent to the owner of the historic barn, thanking him for contacting the Committee. He explained that the letter noted the Committee would attempt to do some research on the history of the barn, and then make a decision as to listing the property.
New Business
a)
Part V Designation - Cultural Heritage of Dog and Cranberry Lake Association The Chair explained that the Committee has received a designation inquiry from the Dog and Cranberry Lake Association. He then turned the floor over to Anna Geladi for an overview. Anna Geladi explained that the association is looking to develop a Lake Plan for Dog and Cranberry Lake and would like to place cultural/heritage significance in the plan. Anna Geladi suggested inviting them to the next meeting to determine what they are looking for and to get a better understanding of how the Committee can assist. Anna Geladi noted that she had requested additional details from the group, and will pass any additional information onto the Committee once she receives it. The Committee all welcomed the idea of inviting the Dog and Cranberry Lake Association to an upcoming meeting. Councillor Barr also suggested notifying other lake associations and inviting them to attend as well, as many lakes in the area most likely have cultural and heritage significance, as well as properties around them that would be candidates for listing.
Page 2 of 3
Page 183 of 264 Minutes of Heritage Committee May, 20, 2021 6.
Next Meeting:
a)
The next meeting was scheduled for August 5, 2021 at 10:30 am. The Chair noted he would reach out to the Committee should the date be changed. Anna Geladi noted that she would confirm at a later date to see if the meeting will be virtual or in-person. Anna Geladi also encouraged the Committee to take some time over the summer to look into municipal heritage grant programs, as any proposals for new grant programs will need to be prepared in time for the 2022 budget season.
Adjournment:
a)
The meeting was adjourned at 11:54 am. Resolution No. 2021-Heritage-05/20-02 Moved by Brad Barbeau Seconded by Councillor Pat Barr THAT the meeting be adjourned at 11:54 am. Carried
Page 3 of 3
Page 184 of 264 Minutes of Police Services Board September, 23, 2021 Time: 9:00 AM Location: Council Chambers
Present: Councillor Ron Sleeth, Mike Nolan, Ken Gilpin. Frontenac OPP Staff: Jeremy Doolan, Staff Sergeant and Interim Detachment Commander Staff: Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer, Emily Caird, Executive Assistant & Communications Officer
Call to Order
a)
The meeting was called to order at 8:54 am
Attendance
a)
Roll Call: • • • • • •
Committee Chair - Councillor Ron Sleeth, Mike Nolan, Ken Gilpin, Staff Sgt. Jeremy Doolan, Neil Carbone, CAO, Emily Caird, Executive Assistant/Communications Officer
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
a)
There were no declarations of pecuniary interest.
Approval of Agenda
a)
The agenda was adopted as presented. Resolution No. 2021-PSB-09/23-01 Moved by Mike Nolan Seconded by Ken Gilpin THAT the agenda be adopted as presented. Carried
Presentations/Delegations - n/a
Correspondence - n/a
Approval of Minutes
a)
Minutes of the July 22, 2021 meeting. The minutes of the July 22, 2021 meeting were adopted as presented. Resolution No. 2021-PSB-09/23-02 Moved by Mike Nolan Seconded by Ken Gilpin
Page 185 of 264 Minutes of Police Services Board September, 23, 2021 THAT the minutes of the July 22, 2021 meeting be adopted as presented. Carried 8.
Financial - n/a
Detachment Commanders Report
a)
Police Services Board Quarterly Reports: April - June 2021 In advance of presenting the April - June 2021 quarterly reports, Staff Sgt. Jeremy Doolan provided an update in regards to a question asked at the July 2021 meeting about frequency of speed monitoring on Perth Road. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that 200 tickets have been laid in relation to that road so far this year. Staffing Staff Sgt. Doolan spoke to there being one staffing transfer from the Sharbot Lake Detachment to the Frontenac detachment in the spring. He noted that there was also a transfer from out of the region in July, and two (2) more recruits are arriving in February 2022, one each in Sharbot Lake and Hartington. The search for Sharron Brown’s replacement for the role of Detachment Commander is still ongoing. Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that from a staffing perspective, the Frontenac Detachment is in good shape. Records Management Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that there were no alarming statistics or trends in Q2 of 2021. In 2021 there was an 81% decrease in break and enters compared to 2020. The second quarter of 2021 also saw the significant search and rescue event for a young boy named Jude, within South Frontenac. Ken Gilpin noted the low numbers under drug crimes and inquired if there was still drug enforcement efforts taking place South Frontenac. Staff Sgt. Doolan confirmed that there is one staff member assigned to spend 50% of their time in this area, however, charges listed under this section are categorized based on the most serious charge that was laid. This means that if there was a drug and a weapons charge, then only the most serious violation would be reported here. Collision Reports Second quarter collision reports show an increase of one (1) fatality, which occurred outside of South Frontenac but within the Frontenac Detachment’s jurisdiction on Highway 15. Other statistics show minimal to no changes. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that the OPP can work with the municipality to compare traffic volume data with collision data, should the number of collisions on a particular road become concerning. ICON In regards to traffic, criminal code, and provincial statues charges laid, there was an increase in the number of charges laid under the Highway Traffic Act and speeding compared to 2020. Staff Sgt Doolan noted that the detachment has increased traffic enforcement efforts compared to last year, as traffic was significantly quieter during the pandemic and resulting lock-downs. Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that there was an issue with the impaired charges data due to a computer error. He explained that he received a driving analysis yesterday for the whole township, just has not been able to review. He noted that the detachment is working on an impaired driving strategy, and will be able to provide additional information following the implementation of this project. Billing Model
Page 2 of 4
Page 186 of 264 Minutes of Police Services Board September, 23, 2021 Staff Sgt. Doolan highlighted a few areas in the second quarter billing summary report. Highlights included one (1) case of arson and disregard for human life, as well as the fact that assaults were down over all year-to-year. He also explained that individual totals are relatively consistent year to year. 10. a)
Committee Reports Verbal Update from Staff Sgt. Jeremy Doolan • OAPSB Zone 2’s Fall Meeting September 16 & 17, 2021 • OPP Geographical mapping - ticketing and bylaw related calls Staff Sgt. Doolan provided any overview of his experience at the OAPSB Zone 2 meeting in September. He explained that the main speaker was OPP Commissioner Thomas Carrique, and that there will be a power point presentation sent out from the day that he can share with the rest of the Committee. Highlights from the day included the ability for detachments to have the authority to fill positions when people are on a long-term leave or WSIB leave, as where previously this was not possible and resulted in detachments being understaffed. Staff Sgt. Doolan also noted that updates were made to include different program areas, such as all the different resources available for use in search and rescues. The situation involving the lost child Jude in March highlighted a lot of those other recourses that the OPP have available - this update authorizes use of those resources when needed. Other highlights included the introduction of wellness programs for members. Commissioner Carrique also spoke to his experience going from regional position to a provincial one. He noted that implementation of the new detachment board structure will be in the spring of 2022. The CAO inquired is Provincial Appointees will be carried over due to their late appointments in 2021. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that from his understanding, there would be a new appointee process. The CAO also inquired if other jurisdictions have established their new detachment committee structures, to which Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that the Ministry is still collecting information from municipalities.
b)
Detachment Commander Interviews Scheduled - Verbal update from Chair Ron Sleeth Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that Detachment Commander interviews are scheduled for September 27, 2021, in Smiths Falls. He noted that there were originally five (5) candidates, however, one has recently dropped out, leaving four (4) candidates vying for the position. The CAO inquired about the interview process and how the selection is determined. Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that there will be other assessments done the day of the interview to assist with selection. Responses to the assessments as well as the interview portion will all have to be vetted after the interview date, with an official decision to come later.
Other Business
a)
Assessing Speed Limit Inquiries
The CAO explained that the Township’s Manager of Technical Services and Infrastructure is actively looking into the way the municipality addresses speeding and speed limit inquires. There has been one area of particular concern that the CAO would like to discuss with Staff Sgt. Doolan, as additional information and collaboration from the Frontenac Detachment may be required.
Page 3 of 4
Page 187 of 264 Minutes of Police Services Board September, 23, 2021 Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that the OPP have devices that are more discreet than traffic counters that could be used to address specific areas. He also recommended being cognisant of the period time after a speed limit changes, as there needs to be time to allow drivers to adjust and transition to the new speed limits. Staff Sgt. Doolan explained that the OPP can review speeding data and look at specific high travel areas and then target specific times of day in 15 minutes increments. This helps to get a better understanding of driver behaviour and whether or not it is one person speeding every day or 25 different people speeding each day. The Chair inquired if the detachment has seen an increase in aggressive driving recently. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that he has not seen any specific data to support that is has increased, but he anticipated that there may be an increase in charges moving forward, as legislation has recently changed the threshold for stunt driving on municipal roads to 40 km/h over the speed limit instead of 50 km/h an hour. The changes mean a motorist stopped speeding more than 40 km/h over the speed limit on a road with a speed limit less than 80 km/h faces a charge of stunt driving, with a road side suspension of 30 days compared to the previous 7 days. The Committee discussed the merits of installing solar speeding signs in high traffic areas. Staff Sgt. Brown recommended portable speed signs, as they are a better investment than stationary ones. The CAO inquired if the municipality is able to identify problem areas using OPP data and speeding complaints, is the detachment able to do some targeted enforcement. Staff Sgt. Doolan confirmed that the detachment would be able to take on some targeted speeding enforcement, and that should it continue to be an issue, the incoming Detachment Commander may look to hire a full time traffic officer. Ken Gilpin inquired about Community Policing and if it will be re-introduced. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted that he would like to see that program implemented again but it requires adoption by the school boards firs in order to be successful on the education front. Currently, visitation policies do not allow for in-school visits and educational presentations, which would be one of the main tasks assigned to community policing initiatives. Staff Sgt. Doolan noted he can reach out to the School Boards to see if they are interested in having this type of programming return to the schools. 12.
Public Discussion - n/a
Date & Time of Next Meeting:
a)
Regular & Annual General Meeting - November 25, 2021 at 7:00 pm
In Camera - n/a
Adjournment
a)
The meeting was adjourned at 9:43 am. Resolution No. 2021-PSB-09/23-03 Moved by Ken GIlpin Seconded by Mike Noolan THAT the meeting be adjourned at 9:43 am. Carried
Page 4 of 4
Page 188 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject:
Removal of 0.3 metre Reserve, Ed Zimolag, 1712 Hitchcock Drive, Storrington District
Summary This report recommends that Council pass a by-law dedicating and assuming a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve along Stone Point Road to facilitate the creation of one new residential lot.
Recommendation THAT By-law 2021-75 to dedicate and assume a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve along Stone Point Road described as Part 6 on 13R22556, be passed.
Background On March 9, 2021, Council directed staff to prepare a by-law dedicating and assuming a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve along Stone Point Road (known as Block 60) to provide the severed parcel from Consent Application S-52-20-S frontage on this public road. The required by-law is now being brought forward to Council for a decision.
Discussion/Analysis Property Description The subject property is located on the north side of Hitchcock Drive and to the east of Stone Point Road. It is municipally known as 1712 Hitchcock Drive. The subject property has frontage on Hitchcock Drive, but is accessed by Cardinal Lane, which runs through the property in a north – south direction. The property abuts Stone Point Road, an assumed public road in a plan of subdivision. The lands are developed with a single detached dwelling.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 189 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Removal of 0.3 metre Reserve, Ed Zimolag, 1712 Hitchcock Drive, Storrington District
The severed parcel is located on the northwest portion of the subject property between Stone Point Road and Cardinal Lane. Dedication and Assumption of 0.3 metre Reserve The severed parcel is proposed to have frontage on Stone Point Road. Stone Point Road is located within the Maple Hill Subdivision and is a public road maintained by the Township. Through the review process, staff identified a 0.3 metre reserve (known as Block 60) along Stone Point Road. A 0.3 metre reserve is owned by the Township and was established as part of the subdivision as a means of regulating access from adjacent lands to Stone Point Road. The 0.3 metre reserve blocks access from the severed lot to Stone Point Road. Dedicating and assuming a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve will provide the severed parcel with the required frontage on Stone Point Road. The dedication and assumption of the 0.3 metre reserve will fulfill one of the conditions of provisional approval of consent application S-52-20-S. Staff worked with the applicant to finalize the reference plan to be able to describe the portion of the 0.3 metre reserve that will be dedicated and assumed as part of Stone Point Road to provide access to the new severed lot. The reference plan has been deposited with the land registry office. Now that staff have a description of the portion of the 0.3 metre reserve to be released (Part 6, Reference Plan 13R22556) staff are now able to bring forward a by-law for the release of the 0.3 metre reserve to fulfill the condition of consent. Related Applications The subject property is subject to consent application S-52-20-S for the creation of a new lot. Provisional approval of the consent application was granted subject to conditions by the Director of Development Services on April 9, 2021. This subject property received approval for a zoning by-law amendment to change the Limited Services Residential (RLS) zone on the subject property to the Rural (RU) zone to fulfill a condition of the provisional approval of the consent application. An associated zoning by-law amendment has already been passed by Council establishing the correct RU zoning for the severed lot. Planning Analysis The intent of the 0.3 metre reserve is to control access to a public road in a plan of subdivision from private property. In this case, the subdivision has been built out and Stone Point Road has been assumed by the Township. Concerns about limiting access are diminished. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 190 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Removal of 0.3 metre Reserve, Ed Zimolag, 1712 Hitchcock Drive, Storrington District
The proposed new residential lot would be considered as infilling and would make efficient land use to utilize an existing public road that is assumed by the Township. The by-law to dedicate and assume the 0.3 metre reserve between the severed parcel and Stone Point Road will ensure the new lot will have frontage on a public road and will ensure that the severed lands through consent application S-52-20-S is consistent with the 2020 PPS as well as the County and Township Official Plans.
Financial Implications All legal and survey work associated with the dedication and assumption of the 0.3 metre reserve will be done at the expense of the applicant.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation No statutory notice/consultation was required to assume and dedicate a portion of the 0.3 metre reserve as part of Stone Point Road. Public Services indicated they have no objections regarding the dedication and assumption of the 0.3 metre reserve to provide frontage for the severed lot on Stone Point Road. An entrance permit can be issued for the proposed residential lot, provided the matter of the 0.3 metre reserve is resolved. Public notice was provided on the associated consent and zoning by-law amendment applications in accordance with the Planning Act. No public comments were received through either planning application.
Attachments
- By-law 2021-75
- Deposited Reference Plan
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 191 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Removal of 0.3 metre Reserve, Ed Zimolag, 1712 Hitchcock Drive, Storrington District
Approvals Report Prepared By: Anna Geladi, Planner Submitted By:
Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 192 of 264
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2021-75 BEING A BY-LAW TO DEDICATE AND ASSUME CERTAIN LANDS AS COMMON AND PUBLIC HIGHWAY BEING PART 6 ON REFERENCE PLAN 13R-22556 IN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, PURSUANT TO SECTION 31(2) OF THE MUNICIPAL ACT, 2001. WHEREAS pursuant to provisions of Section 31(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.0. 2001 C. 25, as amended, requires a municipality by by-law to establish a highway; AND WHEREAS certain lands in the Township of South Frontenac were deeded to the Township of South Frontenac as a condition of consent, for the purpose of dedicating them to public use as common and public highways; AND WHEREAS Council wishes to enact a by-law for the purpose of assuming the lands as part of the public highways to be maintained by the municipality; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
- THAT the lands which are situated in the Township of South Frontenac, being Part 6 on 13R22556, being the 0.3 metre reserve are hereby assumed and dedicated as part of the public highway known as Stone Point Drive. This by-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of registration of this by-law. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 21st day of December, 2021. Read a first and second time this 21st day of December, 2021. Read a third time and finally passed this 21st day of December, 2021.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
PLAN 13R—a8~5‘5‘a
I REQUIRE THIS PLAN TO BE
\ ./-/”"‘T—‘—_-T
‘~~~L7x $8 9
IB
”/_(___________
‘\
DEPOSITED UNDER THE LANDTITLES ACT.
Distances shown on this plan are ground distances and can be converted to grid distances by multiplying by the combined scale factor of 0.99988.
‘*9
”’T
\
\
K
DATE:.I_I§§?<’-:-. l.,’?«9?-\
Bearings are grid, derived from Can-Net 2016 Real Time Network GPS observations on ORP A and B and are referred to the Central Meridian of MTMZone 9 NAD—83(CSRS) (2010).
\
For bearing comparisons, a rotation of 0°08'30" applied to bearings on plan (P1).
counter—clockwisewas BRIAN KERR ONTARIO LANDSURVEYOR
Coordinates are derived from Can-Net 2016 Real Time Network GPS observations and are referred to the Central Meridian of MTMZone 9 NAD-83 (CSRS) (2010).
R
Coordinate values are to rural accuracy in accordance with O. Reg. 216/10.
\
\
R
T
.
or Trq>\
. ORP A Northing 491834928
‘
R‘
‘
~
\
. ORP B Northing 4918124.87
$
e/led \
,8
L‘?
\
\
K
REPRESENTATIVE FOR LANDREGISTRAR FOR THE LANDTITLES DIVISIONOF FRONTENAC NO. 13.
SCHEDULE LOTIBLOCK PART OF LOT 17
ART
Easting 316900.15 Easting 316917.16
CONCESSIONIPLAN CONCESSION8 PART OF 36296-0980
ALLOF BLOCK62
Caution: Coordinates cannot, in themselves, be used to re-establish comers or boundaries shown on this plan,
\
RECEIVEDAND DEPOSITED
PLAN No. 1951
\
‘ S
P/N .‘56296—O/00
\
7
\
‘
L
R
PLAN OF SURVEY OF
K
to
PART OF LOT 17 CONCESSION 8 AND ALL OF BLOCKS 60 AND 62 REGISTERED PLAN No. 1951
“I
53
CO//CESS/ON
LOT
3
PART I
5
‘3
it See
Township of
Geographic
0980
L".
ALL OF 36296-0298
ALLOF BLOCK 60
\
StorringtonIPitlsburgh Now in the
=3
2 3
%
3‘ (an
§
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
%
Surveyed by Annis, O‘SulIivan, Vollebekk Ltd.
T
PART 4
Scale 1 : 750 30
44.98
IB
362.96‘-0277
PART 7
Surveyofs Certi?cate
PIN 3629643980
I CERTIFY THAT :
- This survey and plan are correct and in accordance with the Surveys Act, the Surveyors Act and the Land Titles Act and the regulations made under them.
- The survey was completed on the 27th day of October, 2021.
P.’/V 362.96—0.‘504
LOT 29
l
g
‘
:
/95/
PLAN LOT 28
30Metres
DISTANCES ANDCOORDINATESSHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY DIVIDINGBY 0.3048.
LOT 39
__..__I
STONE PO/NT DR/VE
15
0
(Pl)8iSet
IB
BLOCK 62
7.5
pol
177.3: Moos. (i77.53
PART 6
15
22.5
LOT 27
[_07”
25
\
Brian Kerr Ontario Land Surveyor
CONCESS/O/V
PART I
132.42
Macs.
Notes & Legend
(132.55 Pl)
-43—I— SIB SSIB lB RP
79.34
362.96
PART79.033
_
I
on,s
0;,
‘
°’°‘3’ I 33”’ ‘
T-— ’ TOTTC-jZ T
T
;°;§5‘,,
N 5°ie'2o"
,. STONE P Ill '
REGISTERED
79.00
~°-SIB
32.84
I X
‘
w
_
_
PART 6
_
__
__
{BLor:/< 66‘I
132.80
0 30 R I I P’’} ‘5629eesf§9</9?;
PO/NT 362% ‘..
_
L_
.
L L
PLAN
;-}_~-___i
ssis
2|
00
IB =uJ_
(PI)&Maos.
PART 7
3
DRIVE /95/
§§ §’<3
‘ I I
I
(WIT) Meas. (P1)
-»
«
-"
"
Survey Monument Planted Survey Monument Found Standard Iron Bar Short Standard Iron Bar Iron Bar Rock Post Witness
Measured Registered Plan 1591
ANNIS. ©’SUL.LlVAN. VOLLEEKK
LTD.
136 Prescott Street, Box 1340 Kemptville,Ontario KOG1J0 Phone: (613) 258-1 71 7 / Fax: (613) 258-4475 Email: Kemp!viIIe@aovI!d.com
Job No. 2o2o—i5~oe7 PTLTI7 ca BLKS60.62 RPl95l R Di
3
Page 193 of 264
.s<"‘
'
Denotes
Page 194 of 264
To: Council Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 21, 2021 Subject:
Licence Agreement Application LA-03-21-S, Pine Point Lane (Foley)
Summary An application has been received asking that Council consider entering into a Licence Agreement to allow the development of a driveway and continued use of a portion of unopened road allowance by the owners for the purposes of access to the property. This report recommends that Council pass a by-law to approve that license agreement.
Recommendation It is recommended that Council pass a by-law to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a Licence Agreement with the applicants for the purpose of permitting a driveway to be located over a portion of the unopened road allowance between Lot 18 and 19, Concession 8, District of Storrington to provide access to the parcel described as Part Lot 19, Concession 8, Parts 4-6 on Plan 14R20958.
Background The Applicants, Jeremy and Nancy Foley purchased the vacant land in January of 2020. The applicants indicated to staff that the property had been incorrectly outlined by the sellers with yellow property line signs and had a private driveway already constructed which provided access to the property. The parcel of land is zoned Limited Service Residential – Waterfront (RLSW) and is currently also the subject of a minor variance application due to lot constraints for the building envelope. The property location map is Attachment 1. The applicants have engaged the services of Charette Custom Homes and Adam Heska for their future development of the lands with a home and a sewage disposal system. The applicants, along with Marc Charette worked with a survey company, Hopkins Chitty to survey the property and plot the location of the driveway, home and sewage system on the property.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 195 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Licence Agreement Application LA-03-21-S, Pine Point Lane (Foley)
Once the survey was completed, it became apparent that the driveway, which is already constructed, runs over the unopened road allowance and the neighbouring property. There are no easements over a portion of the driveway that travels over the neighbouring property. It was also determined that the development of the property would require a minor variance as the buildable area on the property is limited, an application, MV-52-21-S has been received to request a 7 metre encroachment into the high water mark setback and a 2 metre encroachment into the setback from the side yard. When the Foley property was created, Pine Point Lane ended at Part 6, Plan 13R20958, this part of the right of way was intended to be the access to the property they now own which is Part 4, Plan 13R20958. When the property to the west of the unopened road allowance was severed, resulting in the creation of two new lots, Pine Point Lane was extended over Parts 2, 4 & 6 on Plan 13R20993.The current driveway was inadvertently constructed over a portion of private property and over the unopened road allowance. The applicants are proposing to move their driveway so that it runs from the current deeded access known as Pine Point Lane, directly to their property, ensuring that the realignment will not encroach on the neighbouring property and over as little of the road allowance as possible. Due to the topography, the driveway needs to cross over the unopened road allowance that borders the west lot line of the Foley property to provide access to the property in the only portion of the property that is not a steep cliff. Utilizing the unopened road allowance will also allow the builder to maximize the available building area for the sewage disposal system and the dwelling without having the driveway taking up some of the limited buildable space on the property. Allowing a private driveway to be built over the Township owned unopened road allowance will minimize the need for significant blasting of rock and will therefore minimize the disturbance to the area. The unopened road allowance is not the usual 20 metre width but is only approximately 12.65 metres in width. The Licence Agreement requires the driveway to be constructed to certain standards, as outlined in Schedule “D” of the Licence Agreement, however, it has been determined that a width of 3.5 metres is sufficient for the driveway and would not be required to be 4.5 metres. The Licence Agreement will require the landowner to consult with Public Services staff and Planning staff prior to initiating work to move the driveway. The driveway will require inspection of the work in accordance with the Licence Agreement.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 196 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Licence Agreement Application LA-03-21-S, Pine Point Lane (Foley)
Discussion/Analysis The applicants have requested the Licence Agreement to enable the use of the unopened road allowance for their driveway access to the property. This request has been made since the portion of the property that fronts on Pine Point Lane, which was proposed to provide access to the property at the time of severance, is at a much greater elevation than the building envelope. This greater elevation is due to a large rock outcropping on the property. Pictures of the property are included as attachment 2. Attachment 3 is the draft copy of the Licence Agreement. Entering into this agreement would allow for the development of an existing lot of record on Dog Lake and would negate the need to blast rock and bring in large amounts of aggregate to build a driveway solely on the applicant’s property. It will also allow for the limited building envelope to be fully utilized for the sewage system and proposed structures. The applicants have considered purchasing the unopened road allowance, but with the purchase of the land and the building of a new home, they are not in a financial position currently to pay the purchase price as it is waterfront land.
Financial Implications The application fee has been paid by the applicants, once the Agreement has been fully executed, the Applicant’s lawyer will register the Agreement on title to the benefitting lands. A fee of $10.00 per year due on January 31st is applicable to every Licence Agreement to keep it in good standing.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation
Public Services Anna Geladi, Planner Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 197 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Licence Agreement Application LA-03-21-S, Pine Point Lane (Foley)
Attachments • • •
Attachment 1 – Location Map Attachment 2 – Photographs of the lands Attachment 3 – Draft Licence Agreement
Approvals Report Author: Michelle Hannah, Planning Assistant
Submitted By:
Claire Dodds, RPP MCIP Director of Development Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Inset Map
ORM SBEE RO
Dog Lake
Dog Lake
AD
EP PIN
Dog Lake
NT OI
L
NE PI
E AN
PO
IN
T
LA
©
NE
PINE POINT RD
Dog Lake
LA-03-21-S (FOLEY) PINE POINT ROAD
Cranberry Lake PINE POINT RD
Legend
Existing Driveway Proposed Driveway Proposed Dwelling Subject Property Provincially Significant Wetlands Wetland Wooded Area Water
PINE POINT RD
Parcel Fabric Road
Proposed Driveway (LA-03-21-S)
246 PINE POINT LANE
Dog Lake
Railway
Cranberry Lake Produced by the Township of South Frontenac under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2020.
0
Scale 1:1,500
12.5
25
Meters
50
UTM Zone 18 NAD 83
Page 198 of 264
PINE POINT RD
While the Township makes every effort to insure that the information presented is accurate for the intended uses of this map, there is an inherent error in all mapping products, and accuracy of the mapping cannot be guaranteed for all possible uses. This map displays basic topographic features only.
Date: 2021-12-03
Page 199 of 264
• • •
To the left, neighbouring vacant property on Pine Point Lane. In the middle, current driveway access over neighbouring property and unopened road allowance. To the right, the beginning of the rock ridge located on the north portion of the subject property.
Page 200 of 264
• • •
To the left, current driveway access. In the background, the rock ridge at the north of the property. In the foreground, a portion of the developable land.
Page 201 of 264
Licence Agreement Made this ________________ day of ______________________, 202 Between:
Jeremy & Nancy Foley Hereinafter called the “Licensee” of the First Part -andThe Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac hereinafter called the “Licensor” of the Second Part WHEREAS the Licensee is the registered owner in fee simple of certain lands located in the Township of South Frontenac more particularly described in Schedule “A” (the Owners’ Lands"); AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac has agreed to enter into a Licence Agreement with the Licensee to provide access along a portion of the unopened road allowance between Lots 18 and 19, Concession 8, Former Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac; AND WHEREAS Section 28, (2)(a) of the Municipal Act, 2001, c. 25, gives local municipalities jurisdiction over all road allowances located in the municipality; and whereas Council is authorized to licence the use of un-travelled portions of highways under its jurisdiction; NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree with each other as follows: 1.
In this Agreement, a.
“Licensee’s Property” means those lands owned by the Licensee described in Schedule “A” to this Agreement;
b.
“Road Allowance” means that portion of the unopened road allowance described in Schedule “B” to this Agreement;
c.
“Location of Proposed Driveway” means the portion of the unopened road allowance shown in Schedule “C” to this Agreement;
d.
“Private Lane Standards” means the standard of development described in Schedule “D” to this Agreement;
The Municipality grants to the Licensee a non-exclusive license to use the Road Allowance for the purpose of vehicular access to and from the Licensee’s Property.
The term of this Licence shall be from the date of this Agreement to December 31, 2022, and thereafter from year to year.
Upon entering into this Agreement, the Licensee shall pay the Municipality the sum of $10.00 and, prior to January 31 of each year thereafter, the further sum of $10.00 during the term of this Licence. 1
Page 202 of 264
The Licensee acknowledges that they have no rights, title or interest in the Road Allowance other than as provided in this Agreement.
The Municipality may, at any time, terminate this license by giving the Licensee a minimum of 60 days written notice of termination, and the annual payment for the license fee shall be apportioned as of the date of termination.
The Licensee covenants with the Municipality: a.
To accept the Road Allowance in an “as is” condition and not to require the Municipality to pay for or do any work or supply any equipment or services in connection with the Licensee’s use of the Road Allowance;
b.
To pay the annual Licence fee;
c.
To obtain all necessary permits and approvals required by law;
d.
Not to remove any trees or commence any work, or make any changes in surfacing, grade or landscaping on the Road Allowance except in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the Municipality;
e.
The plan for the driveway shall be submitted to the Municipality for review and shall ensure that the driveway does not run across private property, it must only run along the benefitting lands and the unopened road allowance until the driveway meets the private lane known as Pine Point Lane;
f.
With the plan for the driveway, a restoration plan shall be provided to the Municipality with respect to the portion of the unopened road allowance where vegetation was removed, and the initial driveway was constructed. Restoration shall be undertaken to the satisfaction of Township staff. Restoration may include, but is not limited to, removal of driveway material and re-vegetation of the unopened road allowance;
g.
To meet and maintain the conditions of the Township’s policy on Private Lane Standards as outlined in Schedule “D”;
h.
To keep the Road Allowance in a clean and well-ordered condition, and not to permit any rubbish, refuse, debris or other objectionable material to be stored, or to accumulate thereon;
i.
To use the Road Allowance only for the purpose of access to and from the Licensee’s Property and not to interfere, obstruct or impede in any way the use of the Road Allowance by the Municipality or any other member of the public;
j.
Not to assign or otherwise transfer this Licence Agreement without the prior written consent of the Municipality, which consent may be arbitrarily withheld;
k.
To erect and maintain a sign at the point of intersection of the Road Allowance and the travelled road (lane) that states: “Road Not Assumed by Municipality”, but otherwise not to erect any signs, fences, buildings, structures or fixtures on the Road Allowance without the prior written consent of the Municipality;
l.
To ensure that nothing is done or kept at or on the Road Allowance which is or may be a nuisance, or carry on any activity or do anything else, which causes disturbance to or interferes with the users or occupants of any neighbouring property, or which in the opinion of the Municipality may cause damage to the road allowance or any neighbouring property;
m. To take, at the Licensee’s own expense, all measures necessary to ensure to the Municipality’s satisfaction that any municipal services or utilities now or in the future on, under or adjacent to the Road Allowance are or will be adequately protected against damage, impairment, destruction or loss; n.
To ensure that no inflammable or explosive substances, contaminants, pollutants, or hazardous or environmentally sensitive materials are brought on to the Road 2
Page 203 of 264
Allowance, other than materials legally permitted on Township roads without special permit;
o.
Upon termination of this Licence, to remove from the Road Allowance all fixtures and chattels belonging to the Licensee, with all damage if any, caused by such removal made good by the Licensee;
p.
Upon failure by the Licensee to comply with any covenants or obligations imposed under this Agreement within 14 days written notice requiring such compliance from the Municipality, the Municipality may enter the Road Allowance and fulfill such conditions at the sole expense of the Licensee, who shall forthwith upon being invoiced therefore, reimburse the Municipality for all of its costs;
q.
That the Municipality has no obligation during or upon expiration of the term of this licence to compensate or reimburse the Licensee for any costs or expenses incurred by the Licensee to improve or maintain the Road Allowance, all of which will be done for the benefit of the Licensee and not the Municipality;
r.
Not to register this Agreement or a notice of this Agreement or any other notice of the Licensee’s interest in the Road Allowance against title to the Road Allowance;
s.
To indemnify and save harmless, the Municipality from and against any and all manner of claims, demands, losses, costs, charges, actions and other proceedings made or brought against, suffered by or imposed on the Municipality in respect of any loss, damage or injury to any person or property directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or sustained as a result of the Licensee’s occupation or use of the Road Allowance;
t.
To further indemnify and save harmless the Municipality from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, costs, charges, actions and other proceedings under the Construction Lien Act in connection with any work done for the Licensee at or on the Road Allowance, and to promptly attend at the Licensee’s expense to the removal of every claim for lien or certificate of action having to do with such work within 14 days of being notified in writing by the Municipality to do so, failing which the Municipality may attend to such removal and recover the expense and all attendant costs from the Licensee;
u.
To maintain in force at all times during the term of this license and any renewal thereof, at the Licensee’s expense and in the names of the Licensee and the Municipality, coverage for legal liability for bodily injury, death or property damage in an amount of not less than two million dollars, and to provide the Municipality with proof of such insurance no later than the 15 th day of January each year or upon request.
This Agreement shall be binding upon, and enure to the benefit of, the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
3
Page 204 of 264
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first written above.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED In the presence of:
Witness
Jeremy Foley Licensee
Witness
Nancy Foley Licensee
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Per:
Ron Vandewal – Mayor
Angela Maddocks – Clerk
We have the authority to bind the corporation.
4
Page 205 of 264
Schedule “A” The Licensee Lands Part Lot 19, Concession 8, Parts 4-6 on Plan 13R20958, District of Storrington All of PIN: 36296-0943
5
Page 206 of 264
Schedule “B” Road Allowance Being a portion of the Road Allowance between Lot 18 & 19, Concession 8, District of Storrington; South Frontenac.
6
Page 207 of 264 Schedule “C” Proposed Location of Driveway
7
Page 208 of 264
Schedule “D” Township of South Frontenac Road and Lane Standard Cross-Section Policy
**for the purposes of this agreement, a surface width for the driveway of 3.5 metres is acceptable.
8
Page 209 of 264
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2021-76 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND JEREMY AND NANCY FOLEY GRANTING ACCESS OVER AN UNOPENED TOWNSHIP ROAD ALLOWANCE WHEREAS a License Agreement has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac relating to the use of a portion of the unopened road allowance between Lots 24 and 25, Concession 12, District of Portland, Township of South Frontenac; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a License Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and Jeremy and Nancy Foley, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law.
THIS BY-LAW shall come into force and effect in accordance with Section 28 of the Municipal Act, 2001, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said Section 28.
Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 21st day of December, 2021.
Read a first and second time this 21st day of December, 2021. Read a third time and finally passed this21st day of December, 2021.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
Page 210 of 264
To: Committee of the Whole Prepared by: Development Services Department Date of Meeting: December 14, 2021 Subject:
Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
Summary The report provides background information on the Johnston Point Master Site Plan Control application which implements conditions from the Condominium Agreement and the Environmental Benefit Permit that governs the development of the 15 residential units and common elements in the Johnston Point Condominium. A by-law with the Master Site Plan Agreement will be brought to a future meeting for Council’s consideration.
Recommendation This report is for information only.
Background Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation entered into the condominium agreement for Johnston Point with the Township on January 26, 2021. The Director of Development Services issued a clearance letter to the County of Frontenac indicating all Township conditions were fulfilled for Johnston Point on June 3, 2021. The County of Frontenac issued final approval for the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium on June 30, 2021 and it was registered as Frontenac Vacant Land Plan of Condominium No. 85 in July 2021. The condominium agreement (Schedule E, Section 34) includes several conditions which are required to be fulfilled prior to construction occurring on the residential units within the condominium. Schedule E, clause 34 requires: “Prior to applying for any building permit for any Unit, the Owner shall obtain site plan approval for the entire site (Master Site Plan). The Master Site Plan for the entire site shall identify generally the following features and shall assign the total area of disturbance for each Unit and the Common Elements consistent with the area of disturbance permitted by Permit PT-C-001-16 [Environmental Benefit Permit]. The www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 211 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
Master Site Plan shall incorporate all recommendations from the approved studies incorporated by reference into the condominium agreement.” The condominium agreement requires the Master site plan address the following matters: • • • • • • • • • •
The approximate location of all proposed structures, including the septic disposal system and well, consistent with the recommendations of the Environmental Impact statement. Include the footprint of proposed structures and the relationship of that footprint to the maximum disturbed area contained in the Benefit Permit PT-C-001-16. Confirmation that each building envelope for each Unit shall not exceed 6400 sq ft (595 m2). Approximate location for the alternate septic disposal system. Location and width of any walkway to the water. Location of any driveway and its confirmation it is a minimum of 30m from any wetland. Location of the butternut tree and its 25m buffer area. Location of the private road and confirmation it is a minimum of 30m from any wetland. Indicates signage and fencing in accordance with the requirement of the conodminium agreement and Benefit Permit PT-C-001-16. Location of all common element blocks and facilities including location of Canada Post mailbox & garbage/recycling contained and streetlights.
An overall Master Site Plan Control application (SP-06-20-L) has been filed by Zanderplan on behalf of Magenta Waterfront Development to satisfy the requirements of Schedule E, Clause 34 of the Condominium Agreement for Johnston Point. There are several reasons why undertaking a Master Site Plan for Johnston Point is a helpful approach to regulating development within the condominium lands. Firstly, and perhaps most importantly, is that the Master Site Plan drawings help visually communicate to Unit purchasers the limitations and restrictions that apply to development on each Unit within the condominium. This Master Site Plan approach also helps the Township integrate the zone provisions and study recommendations; it demonstrates to the Township, that this development meets the site development conditions the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks established for this condominium through the Environmental Benefit Permit (PT-C-001-16); and it regulates any development within the common elements (roads and blocks) on lands owned by the condominium corporation.
Discussion/Analysis Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation inittially submitted the Master Site Plan Control application and drawings in July 2020. Feeback was provided by Township and www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 212 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
Cataraqui Conservation Authority staff on the first submission. Further submissions with updated drawings were submitted in April 2021 and September 2021 for staff review and comment. The final submission of revised drawings was provided by Zanderplan on November 9, 2021. Master Site Plan Drawings and the Master Site Plan Agreement were circulated to Township staff (Building, Planning and Public Services) and Cataraqui Conservation staff. Catarqui Conservation staff provided written confirmation on November 15, 2021 that they are satisfied that the drawings provided in the November 9, 2021 submission addressed their interest in the avoidance of natural hazards (flooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake, provision of adequate stormwater management, the use of appropriate sediment and erosion control measures, the protection of natural heritage (e.g. woodlands and wetlands) and water quality. Township staff are also satisfied that the November 9, 2021 submission meets the requirements of the conditions in the condominium agreement for the Master Site Plan and the conditions of the Environmental Benefit Permit (PT-C-001-16) that relate to the development of the condominium. The drawings prepared for the Master Site Plan include:
- Master Site Plan Drawing
- Conceptual Drawings for Block 19 (Island) and Units 1-15 Master Site Plan Drawing The Master Site Plan (November 9, 2021) drawing shows: • • • • • • • •
The lands within the condominium & common elements including Blocks 16-19 Location of garbage/recycling and the Canada Post mailbox on Block 17, close to North Shore Road. 595m2 construction area,wells and the sewage areas. Location of required signage to be installed by the developer (speed signage, warning signage and PSW boundary signage). Location of exclusion fencing. The butternut tree and its 25m buffer area. Joint Use Docking Facilities on the mainland (Unit 10) and Island (Block 19). A detailed table with the total area permitted area for construction. This table indicates how the Master Site Plan complies with conditions of the Environmental Benefit Permit, including the allocation of the maximum 2.32 hectares of disturbance permitted within the boundaries of Johnston Point Plan of Condominium for each of the Units. www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 213 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
• • •
No development is proposed within the boundaries of Block 18 (Provincially Significant Wetland). Several notes are included on the Master Site Plan that relate to the protection of trees and vegetation within the 30m and 40m setbacks from the high watermark of Loughborough Lake. Details of Block 19 (Island) are included on a separate drawing.
A survey provided at the time of the final approval of the condoninium confirmed Hinterland Lane and the right-of-way accessing Unit 14 (Hackberry Lane) are 30m from any Provincially Significant Wetlands within Johnston Point. The Master Site Plan drawing shows that each unit is allocated a 595 m 2 area that is the maximum footprint for development within which the principal and any accessory buildings must be located. It is noted that if a pool or landscaped patio is proposed on one of these units – these features would also need to be accommodated within the 595 m2 maximum footprint for development. Only passive recreational uses shall be permitted on the common element open space block (Block 18) and that removal of vegetation shall not be provided. While the condominium agreement permits an overlook/viewing area to be located on Block 18 – the developer has decided not to install a viewing area to avoid disturbance in proximity to the Provincially Significant Wetland. As such, there is no viewing areas shown on Block 18 within the Master Site Plan. Block 18 is included on the Master Site Plan and is not shown on a more detailed plan as no development is proposed on this block. Conceptual Site Plan Drawings – Units 1-15, Block 19 The Conceptual Site Plan Drawings are unit specific plans for Units 1-15, but are for conceptual purposes only and do not reflect the entirety of the final individual site plans. These plans illustrate the placement of the 595 m2 construction area, driveways, wells and septic areas on each Unit to show how it can be developed in accordance with the zoning, conditions of the condominium agreement, study recommendations and the Environmental Benefit Permit (PT-C-001-16). Each conceptual site plan drawing shows: • • • • • • •
The 595 m2 construction area Driveway extending between the private lane and the construction area 1.5m wide pathway to the water Location and size of the dock 30m shoreline protection area/no cut zone 40m tree protection area Proposed locations of new wells and the existing location of test wells
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 214 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
• • • •
Primary and alternate septic areas (it is noted that Units 2 and 14 were approved by KFL&A Public Health with only a primary septic area and Unit 3 was permitted to have an overlapping primary and alternate spetic area). Exclusion fencing Zoning statistics (required and proposed) to show how the conceptual site plan complies with the zoning that applies to each unit. Several notes relating to protection of vegetation and trees in proximity to the highwater mark on the Unit.
Of note – Unit 10 also includes an exclusive-use parking area and trail to joint docking facilities on the mainland. The conceptual plan for Block 19 shows the joint use dock on the Island and the common use half of the Block. The exclusive-use trailer, parking and half of the island will be used by the owners of non-waterfront Units (Unit 7,9, 12, 13, and 15). Several conceptual drawings also show additional setback areas from the highwater mark and Provincially Significant Wetlands that relate to zone provisions that apply to the setback for a dwelling and septic system. Master Site Plan Agreement The Master Site Plan agreement was prepared by the Township solicitor with input from the Director of Development Services, Manager of Technical Services and Infrastructure and Cataraqui Conservation. Cataraqui Conservation has indicated they are satisfied with the agreement as drafted. The Master Site Plan Agreement has been shared with the developer, Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation (MWDC). Through their legal counsel they have advised they are agreeable to the conditions of the Master Site Plan Agreement. As several residential units have now been sold to individuals, the site plan agreement will be required to be signed by MWDC and several individual unit purchasers. MWDC is coordinating the signing of the agreement. Staff will bring forward the Master Site Plan Agreement for Council’s approval once the agreement has been signed by all parties so Council has an indication that all parties are willing to accept the terms of the Master Site Plan Agreement. The Master Site Plan establishes terms and conditions to regulate the development of the common elements and 15 residential units within the Johnston Point Plan of Condominium. It includes numerous clauses that regulate development of the indivudal units and requires any development within the condominium be consistent with the Environmental Benefit Permit. A number of conditions of interest to Council have been highlighted below: •
The Master site plan agreement includes provisions to require that all vegetation, with the exception of invasive species, shall be retained and matintained in their natural state within 30m of the shoreline. The agreement also includes provisions to ensure all living trees on each unit greater than 4 inches in diameter at breast height www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 215 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
within the 40m setback of the highwater mark shall be maintained. Trees within the 40m setback larger than 4 inches in diameter will only be permitted to be removed from residential units within the 40m setback where these areas are indicated on the Master Site Plan or any individual site plan approved by Council. •
The agreement directs wells to be drilled outside of the 40m setback from the highwater mark. Wells outside of the 40m setback are permitted to be drilled ahead of the approval of an individual site plan. Should a well not be feasible to be located outside of the 40m setback – permission may be sought with supporting information from a qualified professional at the time of an individual site plan approval.
•
The agreement permits the construction of the 1.5m path prior to the approval of an individual site plan application provided it is in accordance with the location shown on the Conceptual Site Plan for the Unit. Should a different location be proposed for the 1.5m pathway to the water, permission would need to be obtained from Council through the individual site plan approval process.
•
The Master site plan agreement references the terms and conditions of the condominium agreement that apply to the development of the common elements and 15 residential Units. It references the condominium agreement rather than repeat the clauses of that agreement within the Master Site Plan to avoid an unintended conflict between these two governing agreements.
The agreement also sets out a framework for the individual site plan control applications that are required to be prepared for each Unit prior to the issuance of a building permit. Individual unit site plans must be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor or an engineer/architect based on a plan prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and conform the following: • Environmental Benefit Permit (PT-C-001-16) issued October 28, 2018. • All municipal conditions of the condominium agreement. • Exterior lighting. • Identified locations, dimensions and materials for driveway. The driveway shall be designed by a professional engineer to direct stormwater runoff and minimize erosion. • Identification and maintenance of all vegetation in its natural state within 30m of the shoreline, save only for invasive species and the 1.5m pathway to the shoreline. • Identified location, materials and width of the 1.5m pathway to the shoreline. • Identification of the 40m tree protection setback from the shoreline where vegetation removal is limited to only those trees that require removal. • Confirmation all structures meet zoning and setbacks from wetlands. • Confirmation that the total area of disturbance for all structures, driveways and pathways conforms to the Environmental Benefit Permit & Master Site Plan.
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 216 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
Council will issue approval on each individual site plan agreement and enter into a further, more detailed agreement with each Unit owner prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction on their Unit. An individual site plan has been submitted by the owner of Unit 1, and is anticipated to be brought forward to Council shortly after the Master Site Plan is considered by Council.
Financial Implications Not applicable.
Relationship to Strategic Plans ☒ Not applicable to this report. ☐ This initiative is supported by the following priorities of the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. • •
Priority: Choose an item. Action Item (if applicable): N/A
Notice/Consultation The Master Site Plan Agreement, Master Site Plan and Conceptual Site Plan drawings attached to this report (November 9, 2021 drawing) incorporate comments received from Township Building Services, Planning Services, and Public Services staff. The Master Site Plan Agreement was prepared by Township legal counsel in consultation with the Director of Development Services. Cataraqui Conservation has reviewed the Master Site Plan Agreement and drawings (November 9, 2021) and is satisfied their interests have been addressed. The Master Site Plan Agreement has been shared with the developer, Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation (MWDC). MWDC has advised they are agreeable to the conditions of the Master Site Plan Agreement.
Attachments
- Master Site Plan Drawing
- Block 19 and Units 1-15 Residential Unit Conceptual Site Plan Drawings
- Johnston Point Master Site Plan Agreement
- Comments from CRCA on November 9, 2021 Submission
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 217 of 264 Township of South Frontenac Staff Report - Site Plan Control Application SP-06-20-L – Johnston Point Master Site Plan
Approvals Report Prepared & Submitted By:
Claire Dodds, MCIP, RPP, Director of Development Services Approved By:
Neil Carbone, Chief Administrative Officer
www.southfrontenac.net Natural, Vibrant and Growing – a Progressive, Rural Leader.
Page 218 of 264
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2021-77 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A MASTER SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND 1324789 ONTARIO INC., MAGENTA WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RATH, DONALDSON, LEE-DONALDSON, LACELLE, SIMPSON, BEUK, BERMAN, MCGROARTY, LEPAGE, MACDONALD, DOBING, HODGE, BLAIS, TAYLOR, ALLAIR: JOHNSTON POINT VACANT LAND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM WHEREAS a Site Plan and Site Plan Agreement have been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Site Plan Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1324789 Ontario Inc., Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation, Rath, Donaldson, Lee-Donaldson, Lacelle, Simpson, Beuk, Berman, McGroarty, LePage, MacDonald, Dobing, Hodge, Blais, Taylor, Allair, a copy of which is attached hereto forming part of this By-law.
THAT the Agreement shall be registered on title of the properties described Units 1 to 15, Level 1, Frontenac Vacant Land Condominium Plan No. 85, and their appurtenant interests, being PINs 36785-0001 to 36785-0015, both inclusive, District of Loughborough, Township of South Frontenac.
THIS By-law shall come into force and effect in accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act 1990, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said Section 41.
Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 21st day of December, 2021. Read a first and second time this 21st day of December, 2021. Read a third time and finally passed this 21st day of December, 2021.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
Page 219 of 264
Page 220 of 264
Page 221 of 264
Page 222 of 264
Page 223 of 264
Page 224 of 264
Page 225 of 264
Page 226 of 264
Page 227 of 264
Page 228 of 264
54
Page 229 of 264
Page 230 of 264
Page 231 of 264
Page 232 of 264
nn<z<":_: |)uL
‘ti
I
"
_
—"’_—’“
'
"
W“-
|)()L _
1XI_1,(u(N‘l5
Sczm Allah-
L?;a"1"-={§i3§""""’
E?r;l_B?.;?_l;i
”"“’"’”"
‘c..‘J}L‘.‘fi-Y3}Tg—e’_"‘
'
ii.mLn'1i;;;ig.-’
ii?iiti’(§car};Z"6Ei{§F.§"""
"
‘xE£énE:7f5Ei;é£iT(42iET1E1a|d
JonallumMichael BL-uk
garghMarie Simpson
Michael Anthony Lncelll:
Shelly Leigh Lncclle
M
LE;!-?;]’II?‘dS0|>‘I Aud.1’cy Kliysun
”
Page 233 of 264
Page 234 of 264
Page 235 of 264
Page 236 of 264
Page 237 of 264
Page 238 of 264
Page 239 of 264
Page 240 of 264
Page 241 of 264
Johnston Point - Total Area of Construc�on
U
RO
AKE
L ND
A
AD RO
P
Unit specific plans included with this Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the condominium agreement, the requirements of the benefit permit, and the requirements of the declaration.
Unit 13
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Provincially Significant Wetlands
rough
o Loughb
30m Shoreline Protection Area / No Cut Zone 40m Tree Protection Area
PSW Signs
Primary Septic Locations
A
Alternate Septic Locations
PSW Sign
Private Dock
TW Test Well Locations Private Dock
Exclusion Fencing
Unit 4
W
P Private Dock
A
A P
A
Unit 2 A
P
Bloc
W
PSW Sign
P
Unit 1
Private Dock
PSW Sign
PSW Signs
PSW Sign
a
rl nte
i k 16 H
Warning Signage
A
PSW Sign
Warning Signage
TW
A
P W
Speed Signage
rry be k c e Ha Lan
PSW Sign
P
PSW Sign
PSW Sign PSW Signs
W
PSW Sign PSW Sign
Private Dock
PSW Signs
Unit 10
Joint Use Docking Facility (mainland)
Private Dock
Private Dock
Block 19
W
Mainland Dock Perimeter = 63.2m Area = 53.6m2
3.6m
5.5m 9.11m
6m
.3m
7
m
1.8
m
6.7
m
500
Lou
Lake h g u o r ghbo
Joint Use Docking Facility Island Dock (island) Perimeter = 43.8m Area = 56.0m2
m of 264 Page 242 1.8
Metres
P
W
PSW Sign
375
Unit 9
A
6.1
250
P
Unit 11
m 6.1 m 7.9
125
Private Dock
8
Warning Signage
Butternut
Unit 14 A P
Unit
PSW Sign
Parking
A
Unit 5
e
an
L nd
A
Bloc
Speed Signage
Lan land r e t n
- Hi
n Path
Unit 3
P
A
e
k 17
Unit 6
Warning Signage
A
mo
TW W
PSW Sign
W
A
P
P
W
P
PSW Sign
New Well Locations
Private Dock
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
Unit 15
W
Unit 7 TW
PSW Sign
PSW Sign PSW Sign
PSW Sign PSW Sign
Electronic Speed Sign PSW Sign
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
Private Dock
Construction Areas
P
PSW Sign
Warning Signage
PSW Signs
PSW Sign
g Bay) n o L ( e Lak
Speed Signage
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
Block 18
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
TW ROUND LAKE
Condominium Boundary
W
W
Unit 12
Site Location
N
Legend
0 25 40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
SH
m Co
Version Date: December 16, 2021
OR
H
T OR
A
P
D OA ER
RUTLEDGE ROAD
ve
12.8m
Notes:
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for each unit. All site improvements shown on the Master Plan and conceptual unit plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Locations for warning signage, speed signage, and the digital speed sign have been shown on this plan. Speed signs will limit travel along Hinterland Lane to 30km/h. Warning signs will alert drivers to the potential presence of species along the travelled road. The warning and speed signs have been installed onsite in the locations shown on this Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Exclusion fencing for the protection of wildlife has been shown on this Plan. The fencing should be at least 10-20 centimetres in depth and 60 centimetres in height. Recommended options include galvanized mesh with a wood frame, chain link fencing with a backwards lip, corrugated steel or plastic, or vinyl walls to ensure long-term viability and use.
- Units 1 - 6, 8, 10, 11, and 14 will each have private docks and a pathway to the water as shown on the individual site plans. These private docks must only be a pole dock or floating dock and removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
- Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15 will have exclusive use of Block 19 with access provided by two Joint Use Docking Facilities, one located on Unit 10 and the other on the east side of the island (Block 19). The maximum area of the docks is established through the OSP-11 zoning. The Joint Use Docks have been built.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- Hinterland Lane has already been established to provide access for units within the condominum. Hinterland Lane is a private road and will remain in a gravelled condition.
- Snow storage is not proposed on-site. All excess snow will be removed.
Reser
11.0m
36.17
0.3m
d
2
1 595m 300.0m 134.2m 448.6m 1,478m 2 595m2 300.0m2 93.1m2 696.9m2 1,685m2 3 595m2 500.0m2 141.1m2 100.9m2 1,337m2 2 2 2 2 4 595m 500.0m 80.9m 288.8m 1,465m2 5 595m2 500.0m2 93.2m2 311.4m2 1,500m2 2 2 2 2 6 595m 500.0m 225.8m 173.4m 1,494m2 7 595m2 500.0m2 N/A 212.5m2 1,308m2 2 2 2 2 8 595m 500.0m 68.0m 353.9m 1,517m2 9 595m2 500.0m2 57.1m2 154.1m2 1,306m2 2 2 2 2 10 595m 500.0m *515.2m *561.6m 2,172m2 11 595m2 500.0m2 388.7m2 256.8m2 1,741m2 2 2 2 12 595m 500.0m N/A 135.2m 1,230m2 13 595m2 500.0m2 N/A 115.8m2 1,211m2 14 **~150m2 150.0m2 57.7m2 640.3m2 998m2 2 2 2 15 595m 500.0m N/A 117.8m 1,213m2 Totals 8,480m2 6,750m2 1,855m2 4,568m2 21,653m2 *- The driveway area for Unit 10 includes the total area of the common driveway and parking access as well as the driveway to the proposed development area. The pathway area is the total area of the common pathway to the Joint Use Docking Facility and the Unit 10 path to the private dock. **- A building envelope approximately 150m2 (1,615sq.�) has been shown on Lot 14. The buildable area beyond required setbacks is much smaller than the maximum of 595m2.
- Maximum Area of Construc�on Permi�ed = 23,200m 2
- Approximate Construc�on Area per Master Site Plan = 21,653m2
Approximate Location of Mail Box, Garbage, and Street Lighting
re Ro a
ane
6.02
h Sho
L interland
2.44 2.66 0.29
2
Nort
N
- H Block 17
24.76
2
Es�mated Total / Lot (m2, rounded)
EMERALD LANE
Roads / Access Open Space / Parkland Exclusive Use Provincially Significant Wetlands Total Site Area
Units 1 – 15 (not including PSW Areas) Blocks 16 & 17 Part of Block 18 Block 19 Part of Units 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, & Part of Block 18 En�re Boundary
Area (ha)
2
Approximate Driveway Area (m2)
DUFF ROAD
Residen�al
Units / Blocks
2
Approximate Pathway Area (m2)
ROAD
Land Use
Site Sta�s�cs
Unit #
Proposed Sep�c Footprint (m2)
N
N.T.S.
H PERT
Part Lots 23 & 24, Concession 6 Part Lot 24, Concession 7 Part of the Road Allowance between Concession 6 & 7 (Closed by By-Law) Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
Maximum Development Envelope (m2)
Key Map
1.8m
Johnston Point Master Site Plan
m
1.8
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Block 19
Unit 8
PSW Sign
5
12
6
Ln
le
th S
N
Emerald
b Peb
Nor
Rd hore
Unit 9
12
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Block Location Plan
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration. The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
PSW Sign
N
Ln
Legend Limited Access Sign
Block Boundary
126
Provincially Significant Wetlands e
ak
L gh
127
Exclusion Fencing
128
u ro
o hb
6
ce
Half of Block 19 1,464m2
59.1m
Island Dock Area (max) Island Dock Perimeter (max)
Proposed 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 56.0m2 43.8m
Exclusion Fen
Number of Docks (max)
Requirement 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 60m2 45m
Common Use Half of Block 19 1,463m2
12
Block 19 Site Sta�s�cs – OSP-11 Zone
Provision
Limited Access Sign
126
g
u Lo
Limited Access Sign
127
126
Existing Joint Use Docking Facility (Floating Dock) 56.0m2
9.1m
File No. 19-005
Loughborough Lake 40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
Limited Access Sign
5.5m
613-264-9600
0
3
15
30 Metres
45
Page 243 of 264
Version Date: November 9, 2021
126
- The owners of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15 will have exclusive use of Block 19 via the Joint Use Docking Facility located on Unit 10. An existing Joint Use Docking Facility is located on the east side of Block 19 with the dimensions shown on this plan.
- The existing dock has been constructed to conform with OSP-11 zoning.
- Removal of the old corduroy path will be in accordance with the recommendations from a qualified environmental professional.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
1.8m
Notes:
12.8m
11.0m
12
7
3.6m
60
No
e
ak
L gh
Test Well Location
u ro
o hb
g
ne
50
75
100
PSW Sign
8
12
7 12 126 PSW 5 Sign 12
s
ine
L dro y H
Unit 14
nda
129
133
Con d
omi
PSW Sign
y berr Hack Lane
Loughborough Lake
Version Date: November 9, 2021 File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
- The locations and sizes of the proposed dwelling, primary eljen and alternate eljen septic systems derived from the site plan drawing provided as part of the building plans for the property completed by BONE Structure.
- Final dwelling size and location, septic size and location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The driveway leading to the development area will travel over the abutting Unit 2 and will not access Block 16 directly.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit exclusion fencing has been shown along the common lot line between Unit 1 and Block 16 to deter wildlife from crossing into the travelled road.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
Unit Boundary Dwelling Footprint Provincially Significant Wetlands Proposed Driveway 30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 45m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback Hydro Lines Exclusion Fencing
Page 244 of 264
Metres
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
.0m
126
6
13
m
53.2
25
45
5 12 PSW Sign
PSW Sign
Legend Notes:
0 5
m .7m 0.3 40 3
132 131 130
.8m
Exclu
l ter n i H
40.0m
1.5m
55
b ac k
50.3m 3m 45. 1.2m 4 7m 42.
ack etb S ck 40m Setba 30m
13.7m
Steps
.6m
19
2
13
Set 45m
Primary Septic
cing sion Fen
133 134 132 1 130 31 12 129 8 12 7
3.6m
5.6m
5.5m
3.6m 4.4m
Proposed Well (Location Approx.)
Alt. Septic
6-
1 ck
Blo
5
Dr
Tank & Pump 134
130
Hyd
t2
a dL
an
ine ro L
ni er U v O ay ivew
17.2m
ter Wa o ht
129 128 127
Walkway and Dock 1 20m2 8m 1.5m
Warning Signage
s
45.7m 40.0m 44.0m
126
Uses Permi�ed Within 40m Number of Docks (max) Dock Area (max) Dock Length (max) Walkway Width (max)
Unit 2
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Pat
Building – 40m Sep�c – 45m
Proposed 19,868m2 213.3m 337.7m 41.2m 153.2m 5.5m 317.8m2 1.44% 7.9m Building – 41.2m Primary Sep�c – 45.0m Alternate Sep�c – 55.8m Walkway and Dock 1 20m2 8m 1.5m
Bou
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
Setback from High Water Mark or Flood Line (min)
Unit 4
Unit 3
13
u Lo
Requirement 10,000m2 76m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m
nium
le
Part Lots 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Loughborough Lake (Long Bay)
N
Ln
Provision (RLSW-103) Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min) Rear Yard (min) Interior Side Yard (min) Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
ry
Ln
b Peb
d re R
ho rth S
Unit 1 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-103 and EP Zones
N
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 1
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 2 (Two Septics)
Part Lot 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Ln
Construction Areas (595sq.m) Primary Septic Location (300sq.m)
Loughborough Lake (Long Bay)
Alternate Septic Location (150sq.m) Proposed Driveway 30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
N
Ln
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 127
le
th
Rd
b Peb
Nor
re Sho
Unit Boundary
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Legend
N
Hydro Lines
125
0
13
55.4m
13
13
1
0
2 13
7
6
128
12
9
12
Block 16
7
126
9 12
34.8m
12
3 13 5
13
.0m
Alternate Septic - 150m2 (Sized for a Tertiary System)
(PSW ) ack b t Se
136
4
.3m
m 30
tic Sep y r a Prim 300m2
13
132
6 12
5.0m
50
127
Exclusion Fencing
Unit 1
Loughborough Lake
0 5
25
50 Metres
75
Page 245 of 264
Proposed 16,675m2 51.0m 298.2m 40.0m 138.0m 18.7m TBD TBD < 11m Building – 40.0m Setback from High Water Building – 40m Primary Sep�c – 50.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Sep�c – 50m Alternate Sep�c – 55.4m Uses Permi�ed Within 40m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 20m2 20m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 8m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
5.0m
30
6m 1
3.0m
Requirement 10,000m2 50m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m
8
12
131
8
3.2m
Unit 2 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-104 Zone
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
1
12
18.7m
54.7m
ack
40m Setb 29
m
4
42.5m
15.0
6
m
Proposed Well 127 (Location TBD)
m 0.0
12
ack
30m Setb
4.0m
7
56.4
12
8
12
ck 50m Setba
613-264-9600
1.5m
129
2 on 5m cti 59 tru a ns re Co A
File No. 19-005
8
12
r
125
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The driveway on-site will also be used by Unit 1 for access.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit exclusion fencing has been shown along the PSW area to deter wildlife from crossing onto the road.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
- Prior to the submission of the individual site plan confirmation of the voltage of the hydro line needs to be confirmed in order to determine the appropriate septic setback from the hydro line under the Ontario Building Code.
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
.0m
40
.0m
Path to W ate
Notes:
Version Date: December 16, 2021
42.2m
2m
127
gh
u Lo
Unit 3
126
40
g
u ro bo
Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
ke
a hL
126
100
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 3
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
Part Lot 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Ln
b Peb le
d re R
ho rth S
Unit Boundary Construction Areas (595sq.m) Primary Septic Location Alternate Septic Location
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Legend
N
Proposed Driveway 30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
N
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Unit 4
Ln
No
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Loughborough Lake (Long Bay) m 3.0
m 3.0
5 13
136
Co 59 ns 5m t 2 Ar ruct ea io n
Se
m 1.5
13
5
50
m
40
tb
m
ac
k
Se
tb
m
ac
k
Se m
30
6.0
m
62.3
Unit 2
Primary Septic Area - 500m2
0m
.8m
10
m
(PSW )
Warning Signage
3
13
3
132
131 130
129
128
4.0
tback 50m Se
m
134
13
127
134
m
W at er 128
128
129
to
Proposed Well (Existing Test Well)
11.2
7
126
12
1
Unit 3 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-105 Zone
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Requirement Proposed 10,000m2 12,252m2 76m 180.8m 91m 210.1m 30m 50.0m 10m 10.8m 3m 33.5m 59m2 TBD 5% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 50m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 50m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 50m Alternate Sep�c – 60.1m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 15m2 15m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 6m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
ne
La land
ck Blo
r nte i H 6-
1
g
n Fencin
Exclusio
Unit 1
0 5
25
50 Metres
75 Unit 14
Page 246 of 264
613-264-9600
6
0
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
File No. 19-005
12
13
Version Date: November 9, 2021
Pa th
13
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit exclusion fencing has been shown along the PSW area of Unit 1 to deter wildlife from crossing the travelled road.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
.0m
13.9
Notes:
7
50
125
13
tb
ac
k
13
4
13
2
gh
u Lo
60 9 . 12 30 5 1 0.1 60. 1m 1 m 0m 13 3 3 1
12
6
u ro bo
5
6.0
Proposed Dock - 15.0m2 (2.5m by 6.0m)
33.5m
e
ak
L gh
Alternate Septic Area - 500m2
13
126
128
m
127
100
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
Part Lot 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
Ln
N
Ln
Proposed Dock - 15.0m2 (2.5m by 6.0m)
126 127 128 129 130
Primary Septic Location
137 138
60.0m
5 13
13
6
4 13 3 13
m 1.5
a hL
.0m
W at er
50
ke
to
o hb
m
35
1
2 n 5m tio 59 truc a ns re Co A
Setback
60 m
Setback 22.9m
Septic Primary 0m2 0 Area - 5
11.5m 135
13
6
138
137
137
Alt 136 e Are rnate aS 50 epti 0m c 2
m
135 13
4
3.0
m
Unit 3
136
Unit 4 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-106 Zone
m
13
3.0
60 m
64.0m from Septic to Wetland
1 13 0
Se tb ac 82 .5m k (f
Warning Signage
Blo
ck
16
-H
int erl
an
0 5 Unit 1
129 128
dL
an
25
e
50 Metres
75
Page 247 of 264
Requirement Proposed 10,000m2 16,229m2 76m 115.6m 91m 175.0m 30m 50.0m 10m 116.0m 3m 7.3m 59m2 TBD 5% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 50m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 64.0m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 15m2 15m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 6m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
3
2
)
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
13
13
W PS
613-264-9600
5
13
3
13
.0m
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
File No. 19-005
N
etback mS
m ro
Version Date: November 9, 2021
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Unit 5
m 6.7
7.3
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
87
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
40
137
53.1
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
ack Setb
136
.1m
Notes:
30 m
135
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
131 132 133 134 135 136
50m
29
g
u Lo
Proposed Driveway
Proposed Well (Location TBD)
g
u ro
77.2m
Pa th
Alternate Septic Location
126 127 128 129 130
.3m 49
131
Unit Boundary Construction Areas (595sq.m)
13 2
le
th S
b Peb
Nor
Rd hore
Loughborough Lake (Long Bay)
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Legend
134
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 4
100
PSW Sign
to Path
126
12
6
12
er Wat
127
Ln
N
128
13
1.5m
g
k
bac
et mS
50
ack
8
PSW Sign
127
6
8
9 8 12
12
13
Primar y Sept ic Area 500m2
9
5.0m
.2
m
13
.3
m
7
137
0m
133
m
Primary Septic Location
54.4
134
136 135
.0m
ide mW
Provincially Significant Wetlands
4.0 way
135
Drive
m
136
Alternate Septic Location
134
Speed Signage
133
Warning Signage
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
0 5
25
50
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
613-264-9600
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Metres
75
Page 248 of 264
Proposed Driveway
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Exclusion Fencing
13
73.6
Unit Boundary
Unit 6
7
13
41
24 3.
Legend Construction Areas (595sq.m)
5
8
13
1 13 30 1 1 132 13 33 4
136
0m
Unit 4
6
9m 60.0m
13
60
13
4 13 5
3
12
13
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
13
4
etb mS
13
29.3m
13
5
1
k
bac
et mS
7
39
52
File No. 19-005
8 13
595m 2 Const ructio n Area
132
13
136 7 13
ic pt Se 2 e m at 00 rn - 5 te a Al Are
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
137
131
13
Notes:
Version Date: November 9, 2021
30 40
32.0m
k
bac
et mS
133
o hb
g
u Lo
79.3m
Proposed Well (Location TBD)
ke
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
0
60.1m
132
a hL
8
9
50.0m
130 131
12
12
44.9m
129
PSW Sign
7
50.0m
125
Ln
u ro
Requirement Proposed 10,000m2 20,371m2 76m 115.2m 91m 95.7m 30m 50.0m 10m 73.6m 3m 24.2m 59m2 TBD 5% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 50m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 79.3m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 2 Dock Area (max) 15m 15m2 PSW Dock Length (max) 8m 6m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m Sign 2
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m Construc�on Area on Plan
Loughborough Lake (Long Bay)
Emerald
le
t
b Peb
Nor
Rd ore h Sh
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Proposed Dock - 15.0m2 (2.5m by 6.0m)
Part Lot 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Unit Location Plan
Unit 5 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-106 Zone
N
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 5
100
Unit 6 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-106, EP and OSP-12 Zones
12 12 6 12 7 12 8 1 9 13 30 1 6
60 m
Se
30 m
Setb ack
ack
12
125
tba ck
mS etb
k 17
Bloc
4.9m
nd terla n i H
m
4.0
13 5
m
10.1 6.8m 9.0m
PSW Sign
on
si Exclu
4
ry ma c i r P pti Se m2 500
ing Fenc
18
ate ern Alt tic Sep m2 500
ck
133 134
13
.5m
6
13
135
40m
a tb Se
132
3
35.2m
130 131
m
Legend
5
128 129
13
7m
Unit 5
Unit Boundary
nT
(Locatio
60.0m
PSW Sign
PSW Sign
Warning Signage
Lane
g
encin F n o lusi
Exc
Construction Areas (595sq.m) 6
Provincially Significant Wetlands
PSW Sign
12
7 12
12
5
12
Butternut Tree Location
Unit 9
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Unit 8
0 5
25
50 Metres
75
100
Speed Signage
Page 249 of 264
Ex clu
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
cin
6
12
8
Proposed Driveway
Fe n
Alternate Septic Location
g
Primary Septic Location
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
1.5m ell 52.8m Proposed WBD)
.2m
13
PSW Sign
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
Existing Foot Bridge
PSW Sign
Test Well Location
m2 on 5 9 5 ucti str a n o C Are
64.5m
Path to Wate r
PSW Sign
9 120 13
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit Per exclusion fencing has been shown on both sides of the road along the frontages of Units 6 & 8, with the exception of a 4 metre gap for a driveway, to deter wildlife from crossing the travelled road. Warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
ater to W
4
13
13
Path
PSW Sign
Unit 7
4m 76.
. 1m
1.5m
OSP-12 Zone
132
133
m 55.3
Notes:
PSW Sign
5
12
50.0
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration. The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Lo
Version Date: November 9, 2021
Proposed Dock - 15.0m2 (2.5m by 6.0m)
50
ro
bo
h ug
ke
La
PSW Sign
n
Ln
N
Ln
h ug
Loughborough Lake (Long Bay)
sio
Emerald
le
th
Rd
b Peb
Nor
re Sho
Proposed 31,040m2 Lot Area (min) 10,000m (includes PSW) Lot Frontage (min) 76m 246.8m Water Frontage (min) 91m 311.0m Front Yard (min)* 30m 50.0m Rear Yard (min)* 10m 35.2m Interior Side Yard (min)* 3m 13.2m Gross Floor Area (min) 59m2 TBD Lot Coverage (max) 5% TBD Height (max) 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 50m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 76.4m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max)** 1 1 Dock Area (max)** 15m2 15m2 Dock Length (max)** 8m 6m Walkway Width (max)** 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan ** - These provisions apply to the RLSW-106 and OSP-12 zones 2
Part Lots 23 & 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Unit Location Plan
N
Requirement
50
Provision (RLSW-106)
127
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 6
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 7
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
)
ke ( a L h oug hbor
6.0m
Proposed Driveway
126
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
27
1
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
128
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
135 134
3
ac
k
Notes:
6 13
Unit 6
S
136
.0m
m 60
k ac b t e
10
m 50 m 2.1
Co 59 ns 5m t 2 Ar ruct ea io n
k ac b t Se
2
12.7m
13
6
4.0
Proposed Well (Test Well Location)
10.0m
7
13
Speed Signage
ane
75
100
k Bloc
17
L and l r e t
- Hin
Page 250 of 264
Metres
10.0m
50
1
eptic S y r 2 a Prim n - 500m tio Loca
30.0m
25
56
Unit 15
m 3.3 134
135
5
.0m
7
Requirement Proposed 8,000m2 11,808m2 76m 104.7m N/A 25.9m 20m 42.3m 10m 43.2m 3m 22.1m 59m2 TBD 10% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 50.0m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 84.8m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 65.0m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m None None
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
13
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
ic Sept 2 e t a n Alter on - 500m ti Loca
m
Unit 7 Site Sta�s�cs – RLS-6 Zone
0 613-264-9600
k ac b t Se
138
File No. 19-005
m 40
The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
42.3m
- Final dwelling size & location, and septic size & location will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The owner of Unit 7 will have use of the common pathway and Joint Docking Facility on Unit 10 to access the Joint Dock on Block 19.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
S
13 5
m 30
b et
6
0
13
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
84.8m
135
m
Lo
86.9m
.0m
h ug
66.9m
50
u ro bo
95.5
e
ak
65.0m
13
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
43.2m
m 50.0
1 13 2 13
13
PSW Sign
129
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
Primary Septic Location Alternate Septic Location
N
L gh
Provincially Significant Wetlands
PSW Sign
Loug
Ln
Version Date: November 9, 2021
Unit Boundary
PSW Sign
Bay g n o L
125
Ln
le
th S
b Peb
Nor
Rd hore
Block 18
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Legend
N
Unit 10
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 8 (Two Septics)
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Ln
e
Rd
bl Peb
ore
Sh orth
Unit 6
The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
N
Page 251 of 264
Warning Signage
cing
N
en ion F s u l c x
Ln
N
E
k 17
Bloc
ane
L and l r e t
- Hin cing
en ion F134 xclus
E
ke
a hL
133
g
132
hb
ug Lo
131 130
ck
Se
45
(Sized for a Tertiary System)
12 6
Butternut Tree Location Required Development Setback
7
45m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
12
9
12
42.6m
13
0
49.4m m 40.7
130
5.0m 3.0m 595m2 Construction Area 3.0m
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
130
Proposed Well (Location TBD)
42.9m 127
128
Path to Water
129
40.0m
PSW Sign
Basking Log Location
m
iu Condomin
1.5
PSW Sign
129
Notes:
Block 19 OSP - 11 Zone (Separate Plan to be Provided)
128 127 126
ry
m Bounda
Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
125
Loughborough Lake
File No. 19-005
0 5 40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
PSW Sign
8
3.6m
46.8m 45.2m
12
Provincially Significant Wetlands
Version Date: December 16, 2021
Unit 9
126
Alternate Septic - 150m2
128
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit Per exclusion fencing has been shown on both sides of the road along the frontages of Units 6 & 8, with the exception of a 4 metre gap for a driveway, to deter wildlife from crossing the travelled road. Warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
Butternut Tree
m
3.5m
Unit Boundary
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
m 30
ck tba Se
127
tb a
m
5.1m
Legend
Proposed Driveway
128
Fence Break for New Driveway
Primary Septic Area 500m2 (14.0m x 35.7m)
Proposed 14,785m2 155.7m 91.5m 40.0m 76.4m 3.0m TBD TBD < 11m Building – 40m Setback from High Water Building – 40m Primary Sep�c – 45.2m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Sep�c – 45m Alternate Sep�c – 46.8m Uses Permi�ed Within 40m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 20m2 20m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 8m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
4.0
Requirement 10,000m2 76m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m
22.2m
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
m 40
129
128
Unit 8 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-103 Zone
ck tba e S
126
ou or
613-264-9600
25
50 Metres
75
100
Alter n Septi ate c Are 500m a 2
1.5
60.0m
60.0m
Primary Septic Location
Propos ed (Locatio Well n TBD)
Primary Septic A rea 500m2
g cin Fe n sio n Ex clu
m
g cin Fe n n Ex clu sio
g in
126
Unit 11
125
Alternate Septic Location PSW Sign
Proposed Driveway 30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
PSW Sign
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
PSW Sign
Unit 9 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-107, EP, and OSP-11 Zones
Provision (RLSW-107) Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Setback from High Water Mark or Flood Line (min)* Uses Permi�ed Within 60m Walkway Width (max)
Requirement 10,000m2 76m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m Building – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 60m Walkway 1.5m 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 130m2
Proposed 29,508m2 106.5m PSW 204.2m 60.0m Sign 35.7m 20.6m TBD TBD < 11m Building – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Alternate Sep�c – 84.8m Walkway 1.5m 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 53.6m2
Mainland Dock Area (max)** Mainland Dock 80m Perimeter (max)** 2
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m Construc�on Area on Plan ** - Provisions for the OSP-11 zone
63.2m
Basking Log Location
PSW Sign
Joint Use Docking Facility (details shown on Unit 10 Plan)
Basking Log Location PSW Signs
Block 19
Loughborough Lake
0 5
25
50 Metres
75
Page 252 of 264
613-264-9600
PSW Sign
130 129 128 127
h
Provincially Significant Wetlands
Number of Docks (max)**
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
PSW Sign
Con Com necti m on on on P to a Un it 1 th 0 131
Unit Boundary Construction Areas (595sq.m)
Unit 10
l Pat
File No. 19-005
131
ack
125
Gap for Driveway
Communal Parking (3 Spaces Total)
19.1m
8.1m
129
2
13
una
Version Date: November 9, 2021
a ck
595m 2 Const ructio Area n
3
13
m Com
Legend
128
rk Pa al un
126
Se tb
tb
5.0m
0
127
Se
tb a ck
1
21.9m
1
30m
u Lo
Se
13
40m Butternut Tree
60m
136
13.6m
34
13
b gh
4
5
ou or
3
2
Unit 8
13
13
e
ak
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, and the pathway connection to the common path on Unit 10 will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement. 2.. The owner of Unit 9 will have use of the common pathway and Joint Docking Facility on Unit 10 to access the Joint Dock on Block 19. A pathway is permitted within 60m of the water that will connect to the communal path on Lot 10 for access to the joint use docking facility.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs are installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
4.0m
13
13
5
13
m
Warning Signage
17
m Co
Ln
Notes:
k Bloc
L land r e t
- Hin
35.7m
N
L gh
ane
20.9m
Ln
No
le
rth S
b Peb
Rd hore
Gap for Driveway
Unit 6
The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Speed Signage to ss ce Ac
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
N
16.0m
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 9
100
N
13 4
3
Dr ay ew iv
11.6m
3.9m
4.0m
Unit 11
26.2m 1
13
2
20m2 8m 1.5m 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 53.6m2
Primary Septi c Area - 500m2
20m2 8m 1.5m 2 – one on island (Block 19), one on mainland (Unit 10) 130m2
11.6m
60
.0m
12.3
m
133
595m2 Construction A 50m rea Set 32 ba ck 1 40m Setb ack 131
74.3
m
24.9m
Legend
130
Unit Boundary
Primary Septic Location
129
Construction Area
Alternate Septic Location
128
Provincially Signif. Wetlands
Proposed Driveway
127
73.5m
Mainland Dock Area (max)** Mainland Dock 80m 63.2m Perimeter (max)** 2
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595.0m Construc�on Area on Plan ** - Provisions for the OSP-11 zone
30m Se tb a
m
1
35.6m
1
13
The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan 6.4m preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
7.8m 3.9m 7.9m
ke
Proposed Well (Location TBD)
ck
m
b
h ug
Lo
u oro
126
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Private Path
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
125
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
PSW Sign
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Notes:
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
PSW Sign
Pa th na l mu
Co m
133
2 131 130
129
128
127
126
1.5m Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
125
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
134
13
See Enlargement
Loughborough Lake 0 5
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
135
Joint Use Docking Facility
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
Version Date: November 9, 2021
6
The Joint Use Docking Facility and communal pathway access over Unit 10 for the benefit of Units 7, 9, 12, 13 and 15 has been shown on this plan. Unit 10 will have its own private dock and path to the water.
Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs are installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
13
PSW Sign
25
50 Metres
75
a hL
g
54.6
40.0
Number of Common Docks (max)**
1
3
Uses Permi�ed Within 40m Number of Private Use Docks (max) Dock Area (max) Dock Length (max) Walkway Width (max)
Proposed 16,575m2 77.9m 220.4m 40.0m 90.1m 7.8m TBD TBD < 11m Building – 40m Primary Sep�c – 74.3m Alternate Sep�c – 60.0m Walkway and Dock
5.1m
Setback from High Water Mark or Flood Line (min)*
Requirement 10,000m2 76m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m Building – 40m Primary Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 60m Walkway and Dock
4
13
13
90.1m
Unit 10 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-108 and OSP-11 Zones
Provision (RLSW-108) Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
137
Communal Parking Area (3 Spaces)
132
136
13
57.2m
Lo
Dock Area = 53.6m2
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
Alternate Sep tic Area - 500m2
on
13
136
51.7m
m
13
m
1.8
135
4
m Co
ke
La
ro
bo
10
135
h ug
m
1.8
4
13 138 137 136
h ug
m 6.1
Speed Signage
m 6.1
N
Ln
m
7.3 m 6.1
k 17
L land r e t
- Hin
m 7.9
N
ane
Bloc
Ln
e
ort
m
6.7
6m
Emerald
bl Peb
Rd
ore h Sh
P
Unit 15
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Unit Location Plan
Enlargement 3:1 Page 253 of 264 th Joint Use Docking Facility a it Un
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 10
100
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 11
N
Page 254 of 264
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
H
135
tic ep 2 S ary 500m m i Pr ea Ar m 5.2
135 136
41.8m
Unit 11 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-108 Zone
Unit 10
m
4.0
m 4
13
1101 Emerald Lane 8.3m
Existing Dwelling
134
30.5m
2 5m ction 9 5 ru t a ns Co Are
Proposed Well (Test Well Location)
19.2m
m
60
S
S
40
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
S
5 13
a etb m
30
Provincially Significant Wetlands
S
.0m
ck
m
Unit Boundary
ck
a etb
40
50
.0m 60
ck
a etb m
Legend
21.3m
.4
4
Existing Well
6
13
37
13
hb
7
13
c pti Se 2 ate 0m ern 50 Alt rea A
32.3m
ou or
Requirement Proposed 10,000m2 23,169m2 76m 124.0m 91m 298.9m 30m 40.0m 10m 62.7m 3m 19.2m 59m2 TBD 5% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 40m Building – 40m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 80.0m Uses Permi�ed Within 40m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 20m2 20m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 8m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
da r y
.6m 23
133
e
ak
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Condom in
133
4
17
a erl t in
.1m 25
k
c Blo
ug Lo
a dL
n
Ln
L gh
ium Bou n
ne
N
13
Sho
Ln
e
d re R
bl Peb
th Nor
Warning Signage
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Unit 15
4 13 3 13
ck
a etb
132 31 1
130
129
128
Primary Septic Location
127
Alternate Septic Location
126
Proposed Driveway
ke
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
g
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
u oro
hb
ug Lo
Pa th to Wa ter
50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
a hL
Notes:
Version Date: November 9, 2021
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
127 128 0 13 3 1 3 134
13
13
4
6
137
133
126
135
137
2 13 1 13 30 1
13
5
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration. The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
12 12 9 12 8 12 7 6
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
Path t o Wat er
Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
0 5
25
50 Metres
75
100
Legend Unit Boundary
0.3m
Provincially Significant Wetlands Primary Septic Location
8 13
142 141 140 139 138 137 136
1 14
14 0
Proposed Well (Location TBD) 140
29.0m
0
14
1
14
2
14
8.9m
4.0m
oun
dar
y
Test Well
m
Unit 13
Con d
60
S
9m
om iniu mB
ck
a etb
Speed Signage Unit 12 Site Sta�s�cs – RLS-7 Zone
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
ack
40m
b Set
ack
30m
b Set
5.0
m
m
Block 18
0
5
25
50 Metres
75
Page 255 of 264
Requirement Proposed 8,000m2 18,625m2 76m 80.0m N/A N/A 20m 29.0m 10m 97.0m 3m 8.9m 59m2 TBD 10% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 60m Building – 83.9m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 96.7m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 108.5m Uses Permi�ed Within 60m None None
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
595m2 ction Constru Area
9
13
nd Lane
137
5.0 40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
29.3m
- Hinterla
Version Date: November 9, 2021
136
13
96.7m
- Final dwelling size & location, and septic size & location will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The owner of Unit 12 will have use of the common pathway and Joint Docking Facility on Unit 10 to access the Joint Dock on Block 19.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- The 0.3m reserve has been deeded and transferred to the Township.
9
135
2
14
9m
m
Notes:
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
63.0m 16.
37.2
Lo
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
3
14
Block 17
ro
bo
h ug
ug
7
13
140 14 1
m Septic Primary 0m2 Area - 50
ke
a hL
10.3m
138
38.5
138
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
N
ve
38.6m
Ln
Ln
m
Proposed Driveway 30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
N
50.3
137
Reser
17.8m
Alternate Septic Location
North Shore Road
e Septic Alternat 0m2 Area - 50
Emerald
le
Sh orth
b Peb
o
d re R
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
Approximate Location of Mail Box, Garbage, and Street Lighting
13 6
Part Lot 24, Concession 7, and Part of the Road Allowance between Concessions 6&7 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Unit Location Plan
N
139
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 12
100
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 13
Unit Boundary
Provincially Significant Wetlands
4.0m
140
Primary Septic Location
60m S
Alternate Septic Location
139
etb ac k
141
Ln
N
40m S etba ck
40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
20.0m
142
2 n 5m tio 59 truc ns ea Co Ar
137
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Ln
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
35.2m 37.2m
Proposed Driveway
8
Emerald
le
th
Rd
b Peb
Nor
re Sho
5.5m
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
Proposed Well (Test Well Location)
13
Part Lot 24, Concession 7, and Part of the Road Allowance between Concessions 6&7 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC Unit Location Plan
30m Setback 136
135
4 13
2
14
3
13
tic ep 2 S ary 00m 41 m i 1 Pr ea - 5 r 140 A
2
13 1
13 0
12
.0 60
9 12 8
Lo
13
5
6.2m 7
60.0m
6
13
0 14
133
m 45.0
134
132
131
dary
ium Boun
130
129
128
126
127
1
14
in Condom
13
9
13
8
5.0m
13
m
5.0
nd Lane
PSW Sign Unit 13 Site Sta�s�cs – RLS-7 Zone
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Requirement Proposed 8,000m2 12,988m2 76m 149.5m N/A N/A 20m 20.0m 10m 55.0m 3m 5.5m 59m2 TBD 10% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 60m Building – 60m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 60.0m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 60.0m Uses Permi�ed Within 60m None None
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
Block 18
PSW Sign
0
5
25
50 Metres
75
Warning Signage
Page 256 of 264
613-264-9600
60
- Hinterla
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
File No. 19-005
Block 17
- Final dwelling size & location, and septic size & location will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The owner of Unit 12 will have use of the common pathway and Joint Docking Facility on Unit 10 to access the Joint Dock on Block 19.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
te Septic Alterna 0m2 0 Area - 5
.0m
Notes:
Version Date: November 9, 2021
6.4m 7.4m
ro
bo
h ug
m
13
e
k La
N
Speed Signage
16.8m
Unit 12
h ug
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
Legend
100
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 14 (Two Septics)
Legend Unit Boundary
Unit 2 Construction Areas (150sq.m)
Part Lots 23, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac Unit 5 COUNTY OF FRONTENAC
c Ex
Alternate Septic Location (150sq.m)
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
No
es
35m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback Hydro Lines
nda ry Bou
PSW Sign
nium
PSW Sign e
ak
Con d
omi
N
Notes:
31
125
17.2m
da
ry
The co-ordinates used for the preparation of the Master Plan are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor. Unit 14 Site Sta�s�cs – RLSW-109 and EP Zones
Proposed 21,190m2 81.8m 228.7m 35.0m 179.8m 66.2m TBD TBD < 11m Building – 35.0m Setback from High Water Building – 35m Primary Sep�c – 35.3m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Sep�c – 35m Alternate Sep�c – 35.0m Uses Permi�ed Within 35m Walkway and Dock Walkway and Dock Number of Docks (max) 1 1 Dock Area (max) 20m2 20m2 Dock Length (max) 8m 8m Walkway Width (max) 1.5m 1.5m
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 150m2 Conceptual Building Footprint on Plan
om i
Provision (RLSW-109) Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Proposed Well (Location TBD) 131321
130 129 128
128 127
126
Proposed Dock - 20.0m2 (2.5m by 8.0m)
0
5
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and the requirements of the declaration.
25
50 Metres
Requirement 10,000m2 76m 91m 30m 10m 3m 59m2 5% 11m
75
Page 257 of 264
Wate r
130
130
35.7m m 35.5 m 35.6
131
37.3m
35.3m
35.0m
35.0m
Path to
tback 30m Se k Setbac
5.0m
132
1.5m
35m
7
12
Bo un
131
Primary Alternate Septic Septic 150m2 150m2
s
e Lin
m
12
129
131
Systems Sized for Tertiary Septics
dro Hy 8
130
42.2m
.1m
niu
129
35.3m
35.0m
35.4m
127 128
File No. 19-005
613-264-9600
PSW Sign
126
35.9m 35.0m
126
Loughborough Lake 40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
4.0m
125
m
Version Date: December 16, 2021
PSW Sign
35.0
- Final dwelling size & location, septic size & location, dock location, and the pathway to the water will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit exclusion fencing has been shown along the PSW area to deter wildlife from crossing into the travelled road.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
- Cutting of trees larger than four metres at breast height will be permitted within the 40 metre setback to facilitate the installation of a well, sewage system and dwelling to ensure Unit 14 is buildable.
- The proposed dock must only be a pole dock or floating dock. Removal of aquatic vegetation is not permitted.
Conceptual Building Footprint 150m2 (1,615sq.ft)
Co nd
ug Lo
9
u ro
o hb
12
L gh
127
PSW Sign
Unit 1
PSW Sign
126
Lin ro d Hy
ng n Fenci o i s u l c x E
.0m 30
le
N
Ln
PSW Sign
io lus
Primary Septic Location (150sq.m)
Proposed Driveway
Ln
b Peb
d re R
ho rth S
Block 16 - Hinterland Lane
Provincially Significant Wetlands
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
ing
c en F n
100
Johnston Point Conceptual Site Plan - Unit 15
Unit specific plans included with the Master Site Plan are for conceptual purposes only and have not been tested or verified by consultants as will be required in the case of individual site plan applications. ZanderPlan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or viability of the conceptual unit site plans that are subject to all municipal requirements, engineering studies, the requirements of the benefit permit, the requirements of the condominium agreement, and requirements of the declaration.
Part Lot 24, Concession 6 Geographic Township of Loughborough Township of South Frontenac COUNTY OF FRONTENAC N
PSW Sign
Ln
6.1m
130 131 132
131
56.1m
9 8
1 13
0
2
13
13
1
m
.4 13
ic Sept e t a n Alter - 500m2 Area
134 135
137
Provincially Significant Wetlands Primary Septic Location
138
5.0m
.7m
3
Alternate Septic Location
k Bloc
30m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 40m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback 50m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
40 Sunset Boulevard, Perth, ON
613-264-9600
60m High Water Mark / Flood Line Setback
Speed Signage
0
5
17
ane
L and l r e t
- Hin
25
Provision Lot Area (min) Lot Frontage (min) Water Frontage (min) Front Yard (min)* Rear Yard (min)* Interior Side Yard (min)* Gross Floor Area (min) Lot Coverage (max) Height (max)
Requirement Proposed 8,000m2 11,690m2 76m 127.5m N/A N/A 20m 29.5m 10m 44.8m 3m 13.4m Unit 11 59m2 TBD 10% TBD 11m < 11m Building – 50m Building – 52.6m Setback from High Water Primary Sep�c – 60m Primary Sep�c – 65.1m Mark or Flood Line (min)* Alternate Sep�c – 60m Alternate Sep�c – 81.2m Uses Permi�ed Within 50m None None
- Yard Setbacks Measured to 595m2 Construc�on Area on Plan
50 Metres
75
Page 258 of 264
Proposed Driveway
m
5.9
Unit 15 Site Sta�s�cs – RLS-6 Zone
138
136
Construction Areas (595sq.m)
4.0m
10.0m
Unit Boundary
55
m
Legend
6
Warning Signage
tic y Sep 2 r a m m Pri
- 500 a e r A
m
13
6.7m
Unit 7
.9 10
.3m
7
12
12 9 12
33
40m Set 135 ba c k
138
29.5
File No. 19-005
595m2 Construction Area
4
13
60m Setback
135
5.0m
Version Date: November 9, 2021
134
Proposed Well (Location TBD)
13
k 30m Setba c
50m Setback
133
5.0m
- Final dwelling size & location, and septic size & location will be determined through a future site plan control application for the unit. All site improvements shown in the conceptual master plans, including but not limited to driveway locations, have been placed without regard to topography or feasibility of design or construction of such features in locations shown and may change or be relocated subject to all restrictions in the zoning, condominium agreement, declaration and master site plan agreement.
- The owner of Unit 15 will have use of the common pathway and Joint Docking Facility on Unit 10 to access the Joint Dock on Block 19.
- Per the Overall Benefit Permit warning signage and speed signage have been shown within the travelled road to maintain 30km/h speeds and warn drivers of potential species within the roadway. The signs have been installed in the locations shown on this plan and on the Master Site Plan.
- Signs to delineate the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetlands have been shown on this plan. The sign locations and spacing between are conceptual and must be confirmed by a qualified professional.
- Lands within the 30 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line for the lot will comprise a shoreline protection area / no cut zone. All vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in a natural state.
- Lands within the 40 metre setback from the High Water Mark / Flood Line of the lot will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained unless approved for removal. Vegetation clearing for development including driveways, building and septic fields shall not occur between April 1st and October 30th. Clearing may only occur during this period if a qualified professional is present on-site.
65.1m
Notes:
57.8m
m
81.2
N
u Lo
81.8m
o or
b gh
3
44.8m
52.6m
133
L
PSW Sign
129
132
e ak
127 128
13
130
h ug
PSW Sign
6.3m
Ln
Rd
le
hore
th S
b Peb
Nor
The co-ordinates used for the Master Plan preparation are reproduced from the draft plan of condominium and accuracy of that plan is verified by an Ontario Land Surveyor.
Emerald
Unit Location Plan
Block 18
100
Page 259 of 264
November 15, 2021
File: SPC/FRS/312/2020
Sent by E-mail Claire Dodds, Director of Development Services Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 Dear Ms. Dodds: Re:
Application for Site Plan Control SP-06-20-L (Magneta Corp.) Third Submission Part Lots 23 & 24, Concession 6, Part Lot 24, Concession 7 Township of South Frontenac (Loughborough District) Waterbody: Loughborough Lake / Provincially Significant Wetland
Cataraqui Conservation staff have reviewed a follow-up technical circulation for the above-noted application, including the following: • •
Conceptual Site Plans for Units 1-15 (Zanderplan, November 9, 2021) Conceptual Site Plan for Block 19 (Zanderplan, November 9, 2021)
Additional comments to those previously provided in previous correspondence dated June 29, 2021 and October 12, 2021 are provided in bold italic font for quick reference. Summary of Proposal / Site Description The proposal involves construction, filling and site alteration / lot grading for 15 units and 4 blocks (Blocks 16-19) of land as part of a plan of condominium. The property is located along the north shore of the east basin of Loughborough Lake, east of Perth Road and south of North Shore Road in South Frontenac Township. The property is currently vacant except for Hinterland Road which is already in place. The property is a peninsula of land that is predominately tree covered. Portions of the south side of the property contain part of the Loughborough Lake provincially significant wetland (PSW) and the PSW also lies adjacent to the north of the property in Long Bay. The topography of the property can be characterized as high in the middle with Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 260 of 264 Page 2 of 5
Hinterland Lane located approximately along the high point and sloping down to the lake to the north and south sides of Hinterland Lane. Discussion The main interests of Cataraqui Conservation in this proposal are the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding and erosion) associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake, provision of adequate stormwater management, the use of appropriate sediment and erosion control measures, the protection of natural heritage (e.g. woodlands and wetlands) and water quality. Staff provide the following comments for the Township’s consideration and action/response by the applicant. Natural Hazards
- The setbacks for development proposed in the original Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (Ecological Services, June 12, 2014) and the addendums to the EIA (Ecological Services, March 30, 2016 and November 2, 2020) place all development outside of any area that may be subject to risk due to flooding and erosion associated with the shoreline of Loughborough Lake. Therefore, staff have no concerns from a natural hazard perspective. Addressed. Stormwater Management
- The stormwater management report has been previously considered as part of the final plan of condominium approval per previous correspondence from this office dated December 10, 2020. Therefore, staff have no concerns from a stormwater management perspective. Addressed. Sediment and Erosion Control
- Sediment and erosion control will be appropriately addressed for each unit at the individual site plan approval stage. Therefore, staff have no concerns from a sediment and erosion control perspective. Addressed. Natural Heritage / Water Quality
- The Master Site Plan identifies a “maximum development envelope” of 595 square metres for each unit plus a septic footprint ranging from 200 metres to 500 metres which is consistent with the Environmental Benefit Permit. The Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 261 of 264 Page 3 of 5
applicant has provided “conceptual site plans” in support of the Master Site Plan. Staff note that the conceptual site plans for each unit appear to meet these requirements. Addressed. 5. Staff note that there is an “Alternative Construction Area” shown on the conceptual site plan for Unit 10. This alternative construction area is not shown on the Master Site Plan drawing. For Unit 10, the EIA recommends a 40 metre setback for buildings and an 80 metre setback for a septic system. Although the alternative construction area shown for Unit 10 meets these requirements, Sections 34 (a)(xi) and 34 (b)(vi) of Schedule “E” of the Condominium Agreement suggests that all living trees greater than 4 inches in diameter shall be maintained. Staff are concerned that the extension of the driveway to the alternative construction area may result in the loss of a number of larger trees within 40 metres of the shoreline than originally contemplated by the municipality. Not addressed. Note #6 on the individual site plan for Unit 10 suggests that lands within the 40 metre setback from the highwater mark will comprise a Tree Protection Area to ensure all living trees greater than four inches in diameter at breast height shall be maintained. It seems counterintuitive to construct a driveway through the 40 metre Tree Protection Area to reach the construction area unless it can be demonstrated that no living trees greater than four inches in diameter will be removed during construction of the driveway. Addressed in the amended conceptual site plan for Lot 10 dated November 9, 2021. 6. The EIA recommended a 30 metre “no cut” zone so that a proper buffer is maintained along the shoreline. Staff recommend that the “30 metre No Touch area” be re-named to a “30 metre Shoreline Protection Area / No Cut Zone.” This will provide clarity in the terminology that is used to protect this area. Addressed. 7. Staff recommend that the “Water / Wetland Setback” be shown on the Master Site Plan, either as a line, or in chart form as a notation on the drawing. Addressed. 8. Staff note that a permit under Ontario Regulation 148/06 is required for permanent docking structures. However, floating, and seasonal docks do not require the written approval of Cataraqui Conservation. If the municipality should Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 262 of 264 Page 4 of 5
wish to place a limit on the size of docking facilities, staff recommend that this be done through site plan control. Addressed. 9. The Master Site Plan indicates an “Overlook / Viewing Area” on Block 18. It is unclear what is intended for this area (i.e. viewing platform, cleared area, etc.). The original EIA did not contemplate development of the “Parkland” blocks. Staff recommend that an addendum to the EIA be prepared to consider parkland development for Block 18 and recommend appropriate mitigation measures. Addressed. General 10. Snow storage areas should be identified on the Master Site Plan, particularly in the area for the turn circle on Block 16. These storage areas should not be located in an area that is utilized to facilitate stormwater management, nor should they be located within an area that is designated as a “Water / Wetland Setback” area. It is our understanding that snow will be removed and stored off-site and will be addressed with language in the site plan agreement. Recommendation Staff have no objection to the approval of application SP-06-20-L based on our consideration for natural hazards, natural heritage, water quality and water quantity protection policies. Please inform this office in writing of any decisions made by South Frontenac Township regarding this application. Ontario Regulation 148/06 Please note that a large portion of the property is subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is administered by Cataraqui Conservation. The purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e.g. development and site alteration) to a property are not affected by natural hazards, such as flooding and erosion, and that the Loughborough Lake wetland complex is protected. The applicant or future owner(s) of the lands will be required to contact the undersigned at the building permit stage for more information regarding permitting requirements under Ontario Regulation 148/06.
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 263 of 264 Page 5 of 5
If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (613)546-4228 extension 244, or by e-mail to aschmidt@crca.ca. Yours truly,
Andrew Schmidt Andrew Schmidt Supervisor, Development Review /as c.c.
Michelle Hannah, South Frontenac Township (via e-mail)
Cataraqui Conservation 1641 Perth Road, PO Box 160, Glenburnie ON, K0H 1S0 • info@crca.ca • 613-546-4228 • CataraquiConservation.ca
Page 264 of 264
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2021-78 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY ALL ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ON DECEMBER 21, 2021 Whereas Section 8 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001 c. 25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipality has the capacity, rights powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under the Municipal Act of any other Act; and; Whereas Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act S.O. 2001, c. 25 and amendments thereto provides that a lower-tier municipality and an upper-tier municipality may pass by-laws respecting matters within the spheres of the jurisdiction described in the Table to Subsection 2, subject to certain provisions, and; Whereas Section 5 of the Municipal Act, S.O 2001 c. 25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipal power, including a municipality’s capacity, rights, powers and privileges under Section 8 shall be exercised by its council and by by-law unless the municipality is specifically authorized to do otherwise, and Whereas the Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to confirm its actions and proceedings; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COUNCIL CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.
The all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac taken at its meeting held on December 21, 2021 be confirmed as actions for which the municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person.
That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac held December 21, 2021 be confirmed as being matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto.
That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on December 21, 2021 except those taken by by-law and those required by bylaw to be done by resolution are hereby sanctioned, ratified and confirmed as though set out within and forming part of this by-law.
Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed.
This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage.
Read a first and second time this 21 day of December, 2021. Read a third time and finally passed this 21 day of December, 2021. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Angela Maddocks, Clerk
