Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: March 1, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2016/Council Meeting - 01 Mar 2016 - Agenda.pdf)


Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

6:00 PM, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

a)

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Scheduled Closed Session

a)

Litigation

***Recess *** - reconvene at 7:00 pm in Open Session

Public Meeting

a)

Open Public Meeting - Resolution

b)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough: Bannon

4-9

c)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 26, Concession V Bedford District: Isaacs,

10 - 18

Approval of Minutes

a)

January 26, 2016 Committee of the Whole Meeting

19 - 22

b)

February 2, 2016 Council Meeting

23 - 28

c)

February 9, 2016 Committee of the Whole Meeting

29 - 31

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

2015 Annual Report - Sydenham Water Treatment Sydenham (resolution only)

b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Cataraqui Trail Management Board (See By-law 2016-07)

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing (February 16 and March 1)

33 - 56

b)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender No PW-2016-02

57 - 58

c)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance between Concessions IX and X and Lots 30 and 31, Bedford District: Mahmud

59 - 64

d)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Assumption of Road Widening: Part Lot

65 - 66

32

Page 2 of 231

12, Concession X, Storrington District: Ramparts Rd e)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Severance Applications at Petworth Rd: Possible Parkland Dedication: Kerr

67 - 74

f)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Draft Plan Conditions for Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession VII, 1278804 Ontario Inc (T. Grant)

75 113

g)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance in Part of Lot 26, Concession V and VI, Bedford District: Corrigan

114 119

h)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Approval of Subdivision Agreement Part of Lots 18 & 19, Concession II: Willowbrook Estates

120 124

i)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Approval of Condominium Agreement Part of Lots 20 & 21, Concession IV: Applewood Estates

125 128

j)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Non-Union Staff Compensation and Performance Evaluation

129

Committee Meeting Minutes

a)

South Frontenac Rides Committee meeting held November 2, 2015

130 132

b)

South Frontenac Rides Committee meeting of January 11, 2016

133 134

c)

Verona Community Association meeting of November 11, 2015

135 137

d)

Verona Community Association meeting of January 13, 2016

138 139

e)

Public Services Committee meeting of November 26, 2015

140 142

f)

Loughborough District Recreation Meeting held January 25, 2016

143 145

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-07 - Cataraqui Trail Management Board

146

b)

By-law 2016-11 - Closing of Road Allowance

147 148

c)

By-law 2016-12 - Bannon Rezoning

149 150

d)

By-law 2016-13 - Isaacs Rezoning

151 152

e)

By-law 2016-14 - Willowbrook Subdivision Agreement

153 189

f)

By-law 2016-15 - Magenta Waterfront Condominium Development

190 -

Page 3 of 231

205 206

g)

By-law 2016-16 - Road Widening -Ramparts Rd

Reports for Information

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Observations from FCM Sustainable Communities Conference February 9-11

207

b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Infrastructure funding announcement

208

Information Items

a)

Ontario Energy Board Notice, re: cost recovery of expanding natural gas service

209 211

b)

Jeff Leal, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, re: 2016 Premier’s Award for Agri-Food Innovation Excellence Program

212 213

c)

Louis Antonakos, Mayor, Town of Carleton Place, re: OMAFRA Grant Scoring

214 215

d)

Ontario Newsroom - Province Seeking Public Feedback on its Strategy for a Safer Ontario

216 217

e)

Buck Lake Association - Outboard Motor Emissions.

218

f)

Robin Walker and Joanna Stricker, re: Response to February 9Committee of the Whole Agenda Item 6(a)

219 224

g)

Mayor and Council’s Letter of Thanks to Public Works Staff and First Responders

225

h)

Bicycle Friendly Communities Workshop - March 30, 2016

226 227

i)

Ontario Onsite Wastewater Association - 2016 Tradeshow and Annual Conference

228 230

Notice of Motions

Announcements

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-17

Adjournment

a)

Resolution

231

Page 4 of 231 Staff Report: Public Meeting

Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 22, 2016 Applicant: Bannon

Planning Department

File No. Z-16/02

Subject: Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council approve a zoning by-law amendment that would rezone an existing 14 acre rural lot to permit a group home.

Purpose of the report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a zoning bylaw amendment and to hold a public meeting on the application as required under section 34 of the Planning Act. The report includes a location attachment, a depiction of the lot showing the facility (building) and an amending by-law.

Background: An application has been submitted to amend the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law to rezone an existing 5.6 hectare (14 ac.) rural residential lot from Rural (RU) Zone to a special rural zone to permit it to be used as a group home. The subject land is shown on Attachment #1. As shown, the lot is situated in a relatively built up residential area amongst other residences on Campbell Road. The lot is an unusual shape with only 24 metres of road frontage. The property is developed with a dwelling and two accessory buildings but most of the lot is undeveloped and forested. Attachment #2 shows the location of the development. The attachment illustrates that the dwelling is situated far back from the road and behind and distant from the other dwellings on the adjacent lots.

Analysis: The land is designated Rural in the Official Plan. The Plan provides that group homes will be permitted in all designations that allow residential uses but must be on lots with public road access. The Comprehensive Zoning By-law states that group homes are permitted subject to a site-specific amendment to the by-law. It requires that adequate parking be provided for each attendant and staff member. The by-law defines a group home:

“GROUP HOME” shall mean a dwelling unit in which not less than three nor more than six people receive specialized or sheltered residential care and accommodation by virtue of their physical, mental, emotional, social or legal status and which is approved or licensed in accordance with any Act of the Parliament of Ontario. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, group homes include a home for foster children, a home for elderly persons, a home for mentally or physically

Page 5 of 231 challenged persons and a home for people who are convalescing after hospital treatment and are under medical supervision but does

not include a facility

maintained and operated primarily for persons:

who have been placed on probation under the Probation Act, The Criminal Code (Canada) or the Juvenile Delinquent Act (Canada); or

who have been released on parole under the Ministry of Correctional Services Act; the Parole Act (Canada) or the Provincial Offenses Act; or

who are admitted to the institution for correctional purposes.

According to the applicant, the home:

would offer 24 hour daily live-in support, would give shelter to children aged 8 to 12 years (just boys), is a privately run group home for youth with developmental challenges ie., youth with difficulties learning basic living skills, operates under licence with the Ministry of Community of Social Services, accepts patrons who are referred from the Children’s Aid Society

The amending by-law would change the zone on the area of the lot from Rural (RU) to Special Rural (RU-50) to recognize the proposed use.

Agency Comments: In response to the notices advertising the proposed group home use, a letter dated February 18, 2016, was received by a property-owner located on the other side of the road from the subject site. The letter lists a number of questions about the proposed use that he would like answered. In response to the letter, the applicant spoke with the neighbour and he provided answers to each of the questions. Attachment #3 is a copy of the neighbour’s list of questions and the applicant’s answers. At time of preparation of this report no other comments had been received from the public.

Conclusion: The proposed group home is supported by the Official Plan which contemplates such homes in all designations provided they locate on public roads. The zoning by-law defines ‘group home’ and the proposal falls well within the definition. The layout of the subject lot appears to be well-suited to accommodate the home in that it fronts on a public road, is mostly out of site from adjacent residences and is large enough to provide amenities for the patrons eg., walking trails and other recreation. The proposal is therefore supported.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached zoning amending By-law No. 2016-12 to rezone the area of the proposed group home from Rural (RU) Zone to Special Rural Zone (RU-50), be passed. attachments BannonZoningReport

Page 6 of 231 rJ

Attachment #1

?’?h

‘?l N W?

7

E

,s,@E

%-

l

s

U

N

l

a

RnTTThr

m!MIT?-l r?nAr)

L!

U

t

l

A 2

4a.. sO ?iB

9

iA I@

?h r-

r

m

J

r’li’:l ?Y!71!1

l ffl

‘%

Subject Property ] LIJ

J

li Io0 70 140

L

I

I

280

420

i Meters 560 I

]

Page 7 of 231

Page 8 of 231

ATTACHMENT #3 Bannon:Z-1 6/02, Part Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough District

ZONING AMENDMENT QUESTIONS (ANSWERS) How does the Planning Application define ?Residential treatment home?? The new term for a residential group setting is " Residential treatment Home? and is no longer “Group Home? that is stated in South Frontenac Bylaw.

Does the application provide a definition of ?youth with developmental needs? Youth with Developmental Needs is defined as youth that have difficulties learning basic skills as a person. . . Personal hygiene, proper communication skills, daily routines ect. .. How many clients would it serve?

I will be serving 4 clients at one time but have the ability to serve up to 6 per South Frontenac By-Law.

Where will the clients come from?

The clients that will be served will come from the Kingston area on an as needed basis. They will be local youth in need of the service.

What kind of programs will it offer’. We will offer a 24h?r staffed residential treatment home for 8-1 2yr old youth male. Would the property be fenced?

Will there be any restrictions or oversight on who resides at the group home? The Ministry of Children and Youth Services places the restrictions and oversight on who may reside at this home.

What is the governance model ?-Iegislation, organizational structure, oversight?

Is this a private group home someone is starting or are they affiliated with municipal or provincial agencies? Are they affiliated with New Leaf Link? Yes this is a private run group home that’ s program has been mnning for over 25 yrs. No New Leaf is for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.

Page 9 of 231

Who would be paying for staffing? This is a privately run home. Who will be providing programs? Clinicians?

This is privately run Home in coordination with various community supports and servrces.

Is the township going to subsidize it? No funding will come from the Township.

What kind of insurance would be required?

This is a privately run Home that is in need of intensive Insurance.

I hope this answers all of your concerns and questions you may have. If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me at anytime.

Thank you, Justin Bannon 613-583-7150

Page 10 of 231 PLANNING REPORT PUBLIC MEETING Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: February 24, 2016

Planning Department File No. Z-16/03

Date of Report: March 1, 2016 Subject: Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 26, Concession V, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Isaacs Summary of the Recommendation The recommendation is that Council pass a zoning by-law amendment that would rezone a portion of land as part of a proposed lot addition. Waterfrontage is being added to an existing resort lot that is partially zoned Open Space Private (OSP-4). The application is to rezone that portion from OSP-4 to Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW). The rezoning is a condition of Consent Application S-44-15-B. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a zoning bylaw amendment and to hold a public meeting on the application as required under the terms of the Planning Act. The report includes a location attachment, two lot configuration maps, a letter from an abutting property-owner and an amending by-law. Background An application has been submitted to amend the Township’s zoning by-law as a condition of consent for a lot addition. The rezoning would apply to a portion of land that is used as a resort comprising four rental cabins and accessory uses. However, the resort land is split zoned with the west portion zoned Recreational Resort Commercial (RRC-30) and the east portion zoned Special Open Space Private (OSP-4). The special OSP-4 zone was originally to allow only walking trails as part of the resort and to prohibit any buildings or structures. A portion of waterfrontage is being added to the resort and this is to be used for residential purposes along with the portion presently zoned OSP-4. Attachment #1 shows the subject area to be rezoned and Attachment #2 shows the proposed lot addition and the lot being added to. Attachment #3 shows the final lot configuration. It should be noted that the portion being added to the resort land is already zoned RLSW and, with the portion being rezoned from OSP-4 to RLSW the result would effectively be a waterfront area 1.8 hectares (4.5 ac.) in size. The rezoning is a condition of Consent Application S-44-15-B. Discussion The resort is a long established commercial use with four rental cabins and accessory structures, as noted. The lands are designated Rural in the Official Plan which designation permits both resort uses and residential uses within this lakefront environment. The property is situated on a peninsula of land on Bobs Lake, accessed by Burns Lane which runs through the centre of the subject land to six waterfront residential lots beyond. This laneway effectively defines the boundary of the RRC-30 zone and the OSP-4 zone and it would now define the boundary of the RRC-30 zone and the RLSW zone. Conclusion In consideration of the above review, it is this Department’s conclusion that the re-zoning of the portion of the resort from OSP-4 to RLSW would allow better

Page 11 of 231 use of the land according to the owner’s wishes. The remaining part of the resort land would still be large at 1.2 hectares which would still accommodate the modest scale rental cabins while the residential portion would be approximately 1.8 hectares in size. The land is presently split-zoned and the amendment would in effect simply change the category of the split zoning. The lot addition would also help to regularize the lot fabric to some degree. Thus, the rezoning is supported. Public and Agency Comments In response to the public notification of the rezoning, a letter dated February 16, 2016, was received from an abutting property-owner who expresses concerns with the application. The concerns relate to the fact that:

Page 12 of 231

Attachment #1

41

81

‘?

,9

z

N

W-jE s

O ,:3,20 )

SubjectArea (I;’ (

)

5,

Cj

S

,o+4%

0

(1

<#

Bobs Lake

, >e u r k e

%

b

sPond

Meters

0 115230 460 690 920

Page 13 of 231

Attachment #2

p??mMl =%/

?

N

s

aa8. o b s L a k e

W$E

'

l

l

Proposed

Lot Addition

Lottobe Oaaha

added to z

1.1 ha %}, .

S

iSX.,x

‘..

, S,/ ’ ,/

(!

“%

%

lBobs

l

Meters

01530 so go 120

Lake

Page 14 of 231 !

Attachment #3

?I 1€

J

WaaE /,/ -., % X -%%. S u ., 1.’ l’%,/a ) [,// ,t,. h–’–‘A t!aaaXt ( %., / ( 1, y . aa a ! o b s L a k e )

.1

M

i

(1

W

{!

x

}

}

t

l

)l }.

i

)

)t l [

l l

i

‘, ,, ’l ,

!

)

/

! {

‘,,i

(

i

}/

Final Lot

'

t '

{l Configuration )

! v

i(

l

{

l

i

i

i t

}

= (

l ‘% ( S / ./ ‘%. ! / ‘=,

%,

z

/ ,, ., / X/’ X’ -‘X’*,:, /% x’ .i;% ‘7 / .’ a. i’ < /’ ,, , !’ %

,a ‘%,

/a ’l,.

f

7

/

]’! z ‘. l,/J % X / ,i[ " X

s.:

,(

J

/./.#%

/

‘%

S

, ., 77 S-., ‘%S =% .,.-’/

il

’l!%., /”

, {/ Bobs Lake

Meters

10 15 30 60 90 120

]

f/

r,)

Page 15 of 231

AffacAmetht ‘4/ 1108 - 12 Yonge Streel Toronfo, ON M5E1Z9

February ] 6, 2016

Planning Department 4432 George St, Sydenham ON KOH 2TO

Oeor Lindsay Mills:

Please accept this leller as notice l wish to be notified of the decision of +he South Frontenac

Council with respect jo +he following Application for Zoning Amendment - ISSC?CS: 216/03, Part Lot 26, Concession V; Bedford District.

l am the owner of the property at 80 Burns Lane North. My property neighbors the properly subject +o the rezoning applicotion.

l would like to outline my concerns regarding the aforementioned application: *

I+ has not been made clear in +he application why the rezoning has been requested. It is believed the rezoning is faking place fo allow fhe consfruction of addifional building(s) on the property. l formally request additional information of +he location, size and number of buildings being proposed for +he property in question.

This orea is already a highly developed par+ of Bob’s Lake, containing a number of yeorround and seasonal properties including (bu+ not Iimi+ed +o) the following Recreational Resort Commercial Zone properl:es: RRC-29, lrwin’s Cabins, RRC-30 Morters Camp, RRC40 Twin Oaks Camp, RRC-3 1 Whi’l’ehouse Camp and RRC-42 Greeri Bay Heritage Cabins. This is one of the few unspoiled natural shorelines in fhe oreo. Any additional development will most certainly have an environmentol impact. There are a number of Bu+ternut trees on +he properly. Butternut trees are officially designated an endangered species under Ontario’s Endangered Species Act and

subject to very specific restrictions with respect to felling and clearing. Developmen+ on +his parcel will potenfially puf ’the Butternut trees af risk. It is +o be noted the owners hove previously +aken little regard to environmental issues and have cleared lond within 10 meters of the lake. This was previously brought to the +ownships attention.

I am concerned the ovvriers of Bob’s Lake Co+tages plan to turn the retained parcel into full time weekly ren+al accomrrioda+ion based on +heir business model of renting our other properties (zoned RLSW) on o commercial basis (as can be seeri on-line at Bob’s Lake Cottages). Further, tt’iere are frequent complaints from ofher owners in +he area of

Page 16 of 231

excessive noise from parties. music. lirevvorks. Additional development, especicilly if the infent is to rent the dwelling on a shorl term basis, will only exacerbate this issue.

A spli+ zoning of this property is inappropriate CIS it may enable further expansion of the commercial property. Wi+h the new waterfron+ access, commercial users of +he property will have access to said walerTrorit - waterfront that was riever intended for commercial

use. Addi+ionally, the portion of the property proposed to be rezoned RLSW is already being ufilized to store cl shipping container, for car parking, boat trailer parking and construction ma+erial storage, all supporting the commercial business. l am concerned that +he layout of +he new property will enable the construction of a dwelling that will irreparably damage +he enjoyment and value of my property. especiolly if construclion +akes place in jhe oreo indica+ed below (orange box). k

?

%-j (

?l

c

/

l

J

n

4?

Wl’ l

iy

F ‘?

!#

r

j

t l

l l

J l

i l l

r l

Propomed Lot Addkkm

j

% ;;J 7 r

r

r r

r

r *

f-

& t

Page 17 of 231

l do not support the re-zoning of this property for +he aforemen+ioned reasons. Please confirm receipt of +his lel1er, advise of your position (if any), and provide +he outcome of the applica+ion by email and letler mail. Sincerely, Adrian Sunderland

Page 18 of 231

From: Jennie Kapusta jkapu5ta@sout5frontenac.net Sent: February 18, 2016 9:49 AM To: Adrian Sunderland

Cc: Lindsay Mills

Subject: RE: Issacs: 216/03, Part Lot 26, Concession V; Bedford District Hi Adrian,

l have received your letter and will ensure it is forwarded to the Council members. I would also Iike to address your concerns regarding this application.

The rezoning application has been requested as a condition of the lot addition which was granted provisional consent on August 13, 2015. This is the consent application in which the map image you have included came from. This rezoning addresses only the portion of the lot between the lot addition and Burns Lane North. This section of the property is currently zoned OSP (Open Space Private) which does not permit any construction whatsoever. The )ot addition parcel is already zoned RLSW (Limited Service Residential Waterfront) which does permit construction of a seasonal or year-round dwelling. The OSP zoning was a remnant from a very old plan of subdivision which initially created these lots in the early 1970"s. This OSP zoning is also on a significant portion of your property, including part of your dwelling. You may recall our discussions on this matter last summer. So, while this rezoning will allow the construction of more buildings on the property, this rezoning is to allow them to actually be farther from your house than they otherwise would be required to be if they could only build in the lot addition parcel. Additionally, they nature of the buildings would be limited to residential dwelling and

accessory uses. At this time I have no further information with which I can provide you regarding any planned development on the property as the applicants have not indicated formally what their plans are.

I appreciate your concerns regarding the intensity of devetopment along this area of Bobs Lake, especially the environmental impact future development may have. However, as Iindicated in the first answer, this rezoning will actually allow the construction of any buildings farther back from the water than they are currently permitted. Without this rezoning the applicant would be forced into having any structures they wanted only in the Iot addition parcel as currently this is the only area zoned for more development on the property. The determination of tree species is outside my scope of expertise. While I understand butternut trees are a protected species this is not an issue over which the Township has any enforcement authority. l would direct you to discuss these concerns with the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority, the Ministry of Natural Resources, or the Ministry of the Environment. While l am not sure exactly whose jurisdiction this falls urider l am sure they will be able to direct you as to the appropriate course of action.

This section of the property is to be zoned RLSW, which is residential uses only. However, if the owner of a property chooses to rent out their entire cottage on a short-term basis they are entirely permitted to do so, as are you or any other property owriers in the Township. Our by-law does not dictate whether or not a property is able to be used for rental purposes or not. Our by-Iaw dictates the type of uses on a property, i.e. residential vs. industrial, vs. commercial. If you or any ojher residents have concerns or complaints regarding the noise generated on neighbouring properties l encourage you to contact the by-Iaw enforcement officers to make a formal complaint and they will investigate. Also, please note we have an updated version of our noise by-Iaw available in pdf. format on our website should you Iike more detailed information on noise permitted.

s.

l understand that a split zoning of a property is not an ideal situation. In this case the property is already split zoned RRC-30, OSP-4 and RLSW. The lot addition parcel is already zoned RLSW. This rezoning would actually reduce the number of different zones on the property not create the split zone issue. Additionally, this rezoning will specifically state where the commercial uses are permitted and where the residential uses are permitted. Shipping containers are permitted as accessory storage buildings under our by-law, even in residential use zones. The Township does not regulate whether or not a landowner can choose to permit people to park on their property.

The area where you are concerned about the applicant being able to construct a dwelling is already zoned to permit this, regardless of the lot addition application or the rezoning application. The Iot addition application has already been granted provisional consent to permit this portion to be added to 75 Burns Lane North. Should the applicant choose to build in this area they will be subject to all the setbacks of the RLSW zone the same as any other property. l do understand though, that the area of concern has a significant slope to it and is likely not the easiest or most likely place a person would choose to build.

Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Reg,ards,

Jennie Kapusta Planning Assistant

Page 19 of 231

Minutes of Committee of the Whole Meeting January 26, 2016 Time: 7:00 pm Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 3 Present: Deputy Mayor Sutherland, Pat Barr, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant

Call to Order

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a

Scheduled Closed Session -n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

a)

Louise Moody, North Frontenac Community Services Louise Moody reviewed the programs offered by North Frontenac Community Services that include licensed daycare, youth programming, family counseling and transportation services The cost to run a one day a week.program that includes food and supplies is $5000.00. The funding received from the Ministry of Education is primarily for their day care programs. She thanked Council for the 2015 funding which reached 66 children and is asking Council to consider funding for 2017.

b)

Deb McAuslan, re: Basic Income Guarantee Ms. McAuslan spoke to the need for a program that provides an income sufficient for life’s basic needs: welfare is a broken solution. Her presentation included data indicating the cost of poverty being $30 billion annually and $100,000 per year as the cost of managing the homeless. This is urban data.The criteria for having access to food banks is based on an intake process, in some cases people are only allowed to access the food bank every 3 months. Deputy Mayor Sutherland noted a significant increase in use of local food banks.

c)

Dave McGrath and Ron Darling, Habitat for Humanity Ron Darling reviewed his role on the land acquisition committee and noted that they are looking for property to build on in South Frontenac that needs to be close to local town centres. The organization has had positive experiences in Loyalist and Central Frontenac Townships. Dave McGrath, CEO for Habitat for Humanity explained the habitat model that provides affordable home ownership, allowing families with modest income to have their own homes. There is a process to qualify, the homes are not given

Page 20 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 away, but a third party assessment determines the mortgage amount with 0% interest. Home owners are not considered clients but partners as they volunteer 500 hours as part of the qualifying process. Council discussed the failed tax sale process as an opportunity for building lots. Councillor Sleeth thanked Mr. McGrath and Mr. Darling for attending and providing information on this program. d)

Fran Willes, re: Harrowsmith Rezoning and Hartington Subdivision Mrs. Willes withdrew her request for delegation status.

e)

Pat Lalonde With the consent of Council, Ms. Lalonde was added to the agenda. Ms. Lalonde offered her views on the minutes of settlement for the Larcon property. She recognized that the OMB decision is theirs to make but felt changes to the Official Plan are needed to ensure that industrial and commercial zoning is better defined. She stated that people who move to the country don’t want to be near commercial and industrial development.

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Investment Policy Council supported and directed this item to be brought forward.

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Housekeeping Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Mr. Mills reviewed his report and noted that the Boy Scouts Camp on Massassauga Road is to be included in the housekeeping by-law although it had not been identified in his report. A copy of the Chief Building Official’s opinion on the proposed housekeeping changes were circulated to Council. Councillor Revill was not supportive of the CBO’s opinion. Council questioned the interpretation of front yard with respect to public roads and private lanes. Council felt it should be the same. Mr. Mills explained that on a private lane where the property is on a water body, the front yard is considered the water frontage. Council was supportive of moving forwards to a public meeting for the housekeeping by-law.

c)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Comments on County of Frontenac Official Plan Discussion took place regarding Section 4.2.1.6 Private Services and the implications for South Frontenac with respect to development in all hamlets and on-site septic systems and private wells. Mr. Mills interpretation was that the province is directing development to the settlement areas but, on the other

Page 2 of 4

Page 21 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 hand, they are not allowing us to do it since no settlement area in the County has these full services. Council felt this should be clarified and was too significant to ignore. Staff were directed to appeal the County Official Plan if written clarification could not be obtained from the Ministry. d)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance, Concessions V and VI, Part of Lot 19, Ritchie Council was supportive of moving this forward.

e)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Process Map for Subdivision/Condominium Development It was recognized that there is no clear one line process with respect to the process. Wayne Orr suggested that the upcoming organizational review will provide a benchmark and best practices. There is still further dialog anticipated in developing the flowchart. This has been provided to Council as an update.

Reports for Information - n/a

Rise & Report

a)

County Council The CAO reported that the County Planner has submitted a report to County Council regarding an opinion on the Johnston Point development. He was not certain when this will be taken to County Council.

b)

Arena Board There was increased revenue from what had been projected for 2015. Changes in the financial operations are being made. There will be tenders for arena lighting and new compressors. It is anticipated that this work will be completed after the current season.

c)

Police Services Board The first meeting of 2016 is scheduled for March 17.

Information Items

a)

Community Letter, re: Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Portland District - Proposed Subdivision Development

b)

Ruth Gultekin, 4023 Boyce Rd, re: Hartington Revised Plan of Subdivision Recommendations to County Council

c)

Mara Shaw, Executive Director, Loving Spoonful, re: Submission of Good Food, A Community Consultation and Plan

Page 3 of 4

Page 22 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 d)

Doug Reycroft, MEPCO, Board Chair, re: OMERS Plan Benefits

e)

John Bolognone, City Clerk, City of Kingston, re: Basic Income Guarantee (carried forward from January 12 agenda)

Notice of Motions

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland served notice of motion to bring forward a modified version of the City of Kingston request for Basic Income Guarantee for support.

Announcements

a)

Councillor Sleeth questioned the status of the Amey property and the latest information received about Hartington. The Planner will be proceeding with advertising for the sale of the township property. Once information is received in writing, the information regarding the Hartington site will be provided in a report to Council.

b)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland requested that staff follow up on loans or grants for energy retrofit projects.

c)

Interviews for the Organizational Review have been scheduled. Anyone with conflicts or changes need to contact Angela Maddocks.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session - n/a

Adjournment

a)

The meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m.

Page 4 of 4

Page 23 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 4 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-4-1 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the Council meeting of February 2, 2016 be called to order at 7:00 p.m. Carried

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

Recess - n/a

Public Meeting - n/a

Approval of Minutes

a)

January 19, 2016 Council Meeting Resolution No. 2016-4-2 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council approves the minutes of the January 19, 2016 Council meeting. Carried

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Larcon - Minutes of Settlement Resolution No. 2016-4-3 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council approve the minutes of settlement as attached to the staff report dated January 27, 2016 AND instruct the Township solicitor to settle the OMB appeal on these terms. Carried

b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Basic Income Guarantee Resolution No. 2016-4-4

Page 24 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council endorse the resolution attached to this report and circulate Council’s support to AMO, FCM and provincial and federal governments as an endorsement for a national discussion on a Basic Income Guarantee for all Canadians. Carried c)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Cataraqui Trail Management Board Composition Council consensus was that two community representatives and one Council member was adequate representation on the board.Deputy Mayor Sutherland will remain on the board and an amending by-law will be brought forward to the next Council meeting.

d)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Investment Policy See By-law 2016-05

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing Resolution No. 2016-4-5 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council receives for information the Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing dated February 2, 2016 in the amount of $643,711.04. Carried

b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Insurance Renewal Extension Resolution No. 2016-4-6 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council extend the current insurance policy expiry date from June 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Carried

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW-2016-01 - 2016 Surface Treatment Program Resolution No. 2016-4-7 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council approves the bid of Smiths Construction Company for the supply and application of the Township’s Surface Treatment in the amount of $898,118.15 including all applicable taxes. Carried

d)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager,r e: Tender # PW-2016-03 - Purchase of One (1) 2016 4 X 4 Backhoe Resolution No. 2016-4-8

Page 2 of 6

Page 25 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approve the submission from Hartington Equipment, for Tender PW-2016-03, 2016 model 580 SN WT 4 X 4 Backhoe, in the amount of $134,976.37, inclusive of HST. Carried e)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: AVL for Fire Chief’s Vehicle Resolution No. 2016-4-9 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT Council adopt the recommendation of the Public Services Committee and direct staff to purchase and install AVL equipment on the Fire Chief’s vehicle. AND THAT if the cost of the additional installation does not fall within the $100,000.00 approved for this capital budget item that the incremental funds for this installation come from the working funds reserve. Carried

f)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Appointment of Acting Chief Building Official See By-law 2016-04

Committee Meeting Minutes

a)

Corporate Services Committee meeting held December 18, 2015 Councillor Schjerning questioned the status of Item 3 (F) the Communication Customer Service Policy that Council has requested sometime ago.

b)

Loughborough District Recreation meeting held November 30, 2015 With respect to The Point Park and the comprehensive plan for improvements, it was agreed that the Council rep would have this reviewed at the district level with recommendations to go to South Frontenac Recreation. Resolution No. 2016-4-10 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT Council receives for information the minutes of the following committee meetings:  Loughborough District Recreation meeting held November 30, 2015  Corporate Services Committee meeting held December 18, 2015 Carried

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-04 - Appoint Acting Chief Building Official Resolution No. 2016-4-11 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT the following by-laws be given first and second reading:  By-law 2016-04

Page 3 of 6

Page 26 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 

By-law 2016-05 Carried

Resolution No. 2016-4-12 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-04, being a by-law to appoint an acting Chief Building Official be given third reading signed and sealed. Carried b)

By-law 2016-05 - Investment Policy Resolution No. 2016-4-13 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-05, being a by-law to adopt a municipal investment policy be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

Reports for Information

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Housekeeping Amendment to Zoning by-law: Review by Chief Building Official and Planning Comments

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Clarification of Frontenac County Official Plan modifications

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager re: Tender # PW-2016-04 - Purchase of One (1) Half Ton Extended Cab 4 X 4 Pick Up Truck

d)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender #PW-2016-05- Purchase of One (1) 2016 Model Half Ton Crew Cab Truck

e)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW-2016-06 Purchase of Two (2) 2016 Model 3/4 Ton Trucks with Plow Equipment

f)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW -2016-07-Purchase of One (1) 2600 Gallon Water Tank

Information Items

a)

Kevin Morrison, Mayor, Town of Goderich, re: Annual Ontario Small Urban Municipalities Conference and Trade Show

b)

Debra McAuslan - Basic Income Guarantee presentation - follow up

c)

Kelly Pender, CAO, County of Frontenac, re: Johnston Point Plan of Vacant Condominium

d)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Township jurisdiction over docks

e)

Alexia Touralias, Director, Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, re: CIP 150 application

f)

Carole Fuller, Allan & Partners. Chartered Profession Accountants, re: Audit Planning Report for year ending December 31, 2015

Page 4 of 6

Page 27 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 13.

Notice of Motions

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland - Notice of Motion, re: Agenda Item 12 (c) Council was supportive of Deputy Mayor Sutherland tabling the following resolutions. Resolution No. 2016-4-14 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT South Frontenac inform the County of Frontenac that all studies and reports concerning Johnston Point have been released in Open Session. Carried Resolution No. 2016-4-15 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT South Frontenac has significant concerns with approving waterfront lots in close proximity to provincially significant wetlands. Carried

Announcements

a)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, announced that Anderson Road should be open to traffic by the end of this week.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

a)

Pat Lalonde asked for clarification on the Agenda Item 7(a) and the planning process moving forward for the lot addition. Wayne Orr provided details on the original application, the OMB appeal process and clarity on the process to date.

b)

With respect to Agenda Item 12 (c), Fran Willes asked for clarification on closed sessions regarding Johnston Point. She noted that there was speculation of closed meetings being held in Kingston. Wayne Orr confirmed that closed sessions include all of Council and whomever they invite to attend. Closed Sessions only take place on Tuesdays, the same evening as Council and Committee of the Whole meetings and are held in the meeting room at the township office.

Closed Session - n/a

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-06 Resolution No. 2016-4-16 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-06 being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, be given first and second reading this 2 day of February 2016. Carried Resolution No. 2016-4-17

Page 5 of 6

Page 28 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-06, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading, signed and sealed this 2 day of February, 2016. Carried 18.

Adjournment

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-4-18 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT the Council meeting of February 2, 2016 be adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Carried

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Page 6 of 6

Page 29 of 231

Minutes of Committee of the Whole Meeting February 9, 2016 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 5 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, LIndsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

a)

Mayor Vandewal called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a

Recess - n/a

Delegations

a)

Reid Shepherd and Anne Marie Young, County of Frontenac, re: Harrowsmith CIP An overview of the Community Improvement Plan for Harrowsmith was provided by Mr. Shepherd and Ms. Young.on behalf of the County of Frontenac. The Township benefits include stimulating development and economic activity, enhanced appearance of commercial buildings, help to ensure safety and accessibility and property tax revenues. Public consultations will be scheduled in the near future.

b)

Kevin Riley, Utilities Kingston, re: Sydenham Water Annual Report Mr. Riley spoke to the report included in the agenda package. He noted that there were no problems in 2015 and plant operations ran smoothly. Council will provide confirmation of receiving the reports by resolution on February 16.

c)

Jim Miller and Katie Morrow, Utilities Kingston, re: Water Capacity Ms. Morrow and Mr. Miller reviewed their presentation with Council and explained how water capacity of the plant is calculated based on MOE guidelines and current consumption. The original design of the treatment plant used a conservative approach for estimating flows and the factors that impact the calculation of committed and uncommitted capacity are the residential density and per person water use. Further assessment will be undertaken.

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Proposal to Demolish and Rebuild Cottage within 30 metres of Loughborough Lake, Concession XI, Pt Lot 4, Storrington District Council supported the Planner’s interpretation on this request; if the cottage is demolished it can’t be built on the same footprint as there is room on the lot to rebuild and meet the minimum setbacks of the current zoning by-law.

Page 30 of 231 Committee of the Whole February 9, 2016

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance in between Lots 18 & 19 and Concessions VIII and IX, Storrington District Council was supportive of closing and selling the road allowance provided that the remaining land-locked piece of road allowance is sold to the abutting landowners at the same time.

Reports for Information - n/a

Rise & Report

a)

Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority No update.

b)

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority The January 28 meeting dealt with the appointments of Chair and Vice Chair and other necessary business.

c)

Quinte Region Conservation Authority The QRCA are trying to buy property across from their offices in Belleville.

d)

Portland Heritage No update.

Information Items

a)

Rob McRae, Watershed Planning Coordinator, re: Request for Input-Source Protection Committee

b)

Dawn E. Clarke, Chair, Seeley’s Bay United Church of Canada, re: Save a Family from Syria sponsorship

c)

Township Letter re: Resolution endorsement for Basic Income Guarantee

d)

Township Letter, re: Johnston Point Reports and Provincially Significant Wetlands

e)

Around the Rideau - January/February 2016 Newsletter

f)

Frontenac Community Arena - Free Public Skating through Healthy Community Challenge.

Notice of Motions - n/a

Announcements

a)

The recent employee emergency at the Public Works garage was noted and Council requested that those who provided first response should be commended.

Page 2 of 3

Page 31 of 231 Committee of the Whole February 9, 2016 b)

Councillor Schjerning asked about township facilities that have an AED and what training has been provided for these units. Wayne Orr noted that both the Keeley Road and George Street offices have a defib on site and staff are trained to use. There is also a unit installed at the Bedford Hall and the Storrington Centre, however only local users of the facilities have been trained to use. A unit is also installed at the community arena.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items) - n/a

Closed Session- n/a

Adjournment

a)

The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.

Page 3 of 3

Page 32 of 231

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council:

February 10, 2016

Agenda Date:

March 1, 2016

SUBJECT: Cataraqui Trail Management Board RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve By-law 2016-07 which removes Councillor McDougall from the Cataraqui Trail Management Board. BACKGROUND: At the January 29, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting Deputy Mayor Sutherland sought clarification on the composition of the Cataraqui Trail Management Board. At the February 2, 2016 Council meeting, Council agreed that it was only necessary to have one Council member appointed to the board. By-law 2014-71 passed on December 16, 2014 appointed Council members to various boards and committees. An amending By-law (2016-07) is included in the agenda package and removes Councillor McDougall as a representative to the Cataraqui Trail Management Board; all other appointments remain the same.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Wayne Orr CAO

Angela Maddocks Executive Assistant

Page 33 of 231

Payment Listing For the period of February 3, 2016 to February 16, 2016

Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of February 3, 2016 to February 16, 2016

2,071,800.79

Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #3

Pay date February 3, 2016 For the period of January 17, 2016 to January 30, 2016

Council Reimbursement

Pay date February 3, 2016

Total Payments

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending February 16, 2016 in the amount of

$

2,151,810.08

Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer

79,001.49 1,007.80

$

2,151,810.08

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

Ranges: Cheque Date:

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

9:59:13 AM

From: 2/3/2016

To: 2/16/2016

Page:

1

Page 34 of 231

Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC

10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000004992

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

D23165

DIAMOND MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS INC. ANNUAL SUPPORT RENEWAL

60152 60239

THE FRONTENAC NEWS AD JAN 28 AD FEB 4

3715763

METROLAND MEDIA GROUP ADVERTISING

Total EFT000000004992 EFT000000005003 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005003 EFT000000005025 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005025

Total Gen

Amount $19,262.91 $19,262.91 $391.68 $418.44 $810.12 $1,379.87 $1,379.87

$21,452.90

0020 TaxC Cheque EFT000000004985

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC 2015 YEAR END REC 2015 YEAR END REC 45002 4TH QTR LEVY 2015

Total EFT000000004985

Total TaxC

Amount $36,616.05 $1,250,487.75 $1,287,103.80

$1,287,103.80

1000 Cheque 067262

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

2/16/2016 028496

Total 067263 EFT000000004989

Amount

A-1 LOCKSMITHS 954359

Total 067262 067263

Description

2/16/2016

DRILL OPEN LOCK BOX ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE HX CAP

$739.74 $739.74 $2.22 $2.22

CULLIGAN 0912214

culligan water

106142

NETWORK SECURITY SYSTEMS JAN-DEC 2016 MONITORING

56878

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE wheel x 2

50351 50351

XCG CONSULTANTS LTD. DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING

Total EFT000000004989 EFT000000005028 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005028 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005057 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005057

Total

$123.70 $123.70 $244.22 $244.22 $71.21 $71.21 $101.76 $101.76 $203.52

$1,384.61

1100 Counc Cheque EFT000000005043

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005046

Description

00005332

SOUTHERN FRONTENAC COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING COSTS

10096 310

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND Food for org review FOOD FOR ORG REVIEW

Total EFT000000005043 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016

Total Counc

Vendor

Amount $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $38.97 $7.99 $46.96

$10,046.96

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

2

Page 35 of 231

1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000004985

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

44999

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC EAP - DEC 2015

10017 3093 5504 5494

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND coffee/cream cream CREAM CREAM

Total EFT000000004985 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005046

Total Clk

Amount $209.63 $209.63 $28.05 $2.69 $8.07 $4.39 $43.20

$252.83

1275 Fin Cheque 067267 Total 067267 067268 Total 067268 EFT000000004994

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

10243

BUSINESS MACHINES SERVICE CENTRE TWO DRAWER KEYS

404264

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA PUBLIC SECTOR HANDBOOK

0062

DIXON ACTUARIAL SERVICES actuarial valuation

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

Total EFT000000004994

Amount $18.32 $18.32 $96.67 $96.67 $2,849.28 $2,849.28

Total Fin

$2,964.27

Total GG

$1,323,205.37

20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067266 Total 067266 067278 Total 067278 067279 Total 067279 067287

Total 067287 EFT000000004970

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Description

V00966

BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) tower rental feb 2016

16/01/15-GAS

NEW TOPPERS MARKET FIRETRUCK GAS

4222

NORTH COUNTRY MARINE PROP & SPARE TIRE/RIMS

15/12/29-27 15/12/29-26 16/01-31 16/01-32

VOTARY, RICHARD DEC 29 PLOWING DEC 29 PLOWING JAN SNOW REMOVAL - FIRE ACCESS JAN SNOW REMOVAL

21733 21762 21763

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. HOLDING TANK PUMPED SNOWPLOWING 8 @ $50 snowplowing 8 @ $50

01426287

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL JAN 2016

135368

ALLIED MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INC quick combo ready pads

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000004971 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004971 EFT000000004973 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004973 EFT000000004980 2/16/2016

Amount $295.38 $295.38 $621.40 $621.40 $448.20 $448.20 $65.00 $65.00 $260.00 $260.00 $650.00 $223.87 $407.04 $407.04 $1,037.95 $34.53 $34.53 $279.23 $279.23

CANADIAN TIRE 122392

Total EFT000000004980 EFT000000004982 2/16/2016 195642 195641 195438 Total EFT000000004982

Vendor

extension cords CHRISTIE & WALTHER clean metal debris from speake shop rate to check radio BELT CLIPS

$130.81 $130.81 $50.88 $50.88 $20.94 $122.70

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

EFT000000004997

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

2/16/2016

Page:

3

Page 36 of 231

DRAPER DOORS 9012

Total EFT000000004997 EFT000000004999 2/16/2016

MOVE AIR HOSE

432904

FIRE SERVICE MANAGEMENT WASH SUIT & REPAIRS

16/01-12

GREENSLADE, DONALD JAN 2016 PLOWING

Total EFT000000004999 EFT000000005007 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005007 EFT000000005009 2/16/2016

$162.82 $162.82 $63.08 $63.08 $500.00 $500.00

HUGHSON, KENT 0300 0170

Total EFT000000005009 EFT000000005013 2/16/2016 KS15672 KS15414 Total EFT000000005013 EFT000000005017 2/16/2016

PLOW/SAND SNOWPLOWING/SANDING KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON AIR LEAK SAFETY INSPECTION

$900.53 $193.34 $1,093.87 $235.08 $179.91 $414.99

LEONARD FUELS 3935-673853 3935-677539 4896-672892 2706-672907 4896-676949 2706-677040 1687-672691 1687-676950 1057-676542 1057-676545 1057-680837 1057-679550 1057-679551 1057-675213 1057-675212 1057-677811 1057-677812 1057-58012 0647-675022 0647-677380 0647-677480 0647-681417

Total EFT000000005017 EFT000000005018 2/16/2016

452.3 L @ $.641 350.8 L @ $.594 383.2 L @ $0.652 435.2 L @ $0.652 712.3 L @ $.594 556.9 L @ $.588 302.8 L @ $0.652 814.4 L @ $0.594 59 L @ $0.8841 85.69 L @ $0.9195 80.08 L @ $0.8841 131.8 L @ $0.610 559.1 L @ $0.610 645 L @ $0.628 207.5 L @ $0.628 139 L @ $ 0.602 386.8 L @ $0.602 FURANCE BELT AND SERVICE 739.1 L @ $0.654 1101.5 L @ $0.8731 1212 L @ $0.610 958.1 L @ $0.856

16/01/14-37

LEONARD, ELIZABETH CLEANING FIREHALL

53567708 53570042

LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 Oxygen Oxygen

15/12/08-11 15/12/15-15

NELLIE’S GAS BAR DIESEL 72.042 L REG GAS

11279

NORTHWAY HARDWARE batteries/shovel/air ftting

Total EFT000000005018 EFT000000005020 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005020 EFT000000005027 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005027 EFT000000005029 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005029 EFT000000005037 2/16/2016

$295.02 $212.05 $254.25 $288.74 $430.56 $333.22 $200.91 $492.26 $51.88 $78.44 $70.42 $81.81 $347.06 $412.19 $132.60 $85.15 $236.95 $101.38 $491.88 $978.64 $752.35 $834.56 $7,162.32 $60.00 $60.00 $320.00 $26.85 $346.85 $68.44 $68.44 $136.88 $53.24 $53.24

PUROLATOR INC. 430148523

Total EFT000000005037 EFT000000005044 2/16/2016

SHIPPING CHARGES

9747055

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 675.5 L @ $0.7914

K540208 K539960

SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED CLEANING SUPPLIES GARBAGE BAGS

2488

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND VEGGIE TRAY

56564

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE propane tanks

Total EFT000000005044 EFT000000005045 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005045 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005046 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016

$68.31 $68.31 $564.14 $564.14 $164.85 $119.57 $284.42 $25.43 $25.43 $69.60

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 17026

Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005048 2/16/2016

Page:

4

Page 37 of 231

GAR BAGS

$26.45 $96.05

electrical repairs

$425.97 $425.97

TRUE ELECTRIC 6677

Total EFT000000005048 EFT000000005049 2/16/2016 149799

TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR CRACKED SCREEN

195763

WESTPORT HOME HARDWARE FIRE SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005049 EFT000000005053 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005053

Total Fire

$228.96 $228.96 $40.39 $40.39

$15,347.92

2200 911 Cheque 067276

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES CERB 911 annual billing

Amount

Total 067276

$8,666.89 $8,666.89

Total 911

$8,666.89

17200116065

2400 Police Cheque EFT000000005043

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 00005326

Vendor

Description

SOUTHERN FRONTENAC COMMUNITY CATERING SALT MEETING

Total EFT000000005043

Total Police

Amount $528.00 $528.00

$528.00

2625 Lvstck Cheque 067282 Total 067282 067288

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

Vendor

REDDEN, LARRY 151216-BULLCALF 121216 BULL CALF

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

Amount $805.00 $805.00

ORSER, ELWOOD 151213LAMB

Total 067288 067289

Description

151213 LAMB KILL

WILSON ROGER DAVID 151217CROSS STEER 151217CROSS STEER

$250.00 $250.00

Total 067289

$1,092.00 $1,092.00

Total Lvstck

$2,147.00

2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005002

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-B-2015-DECEMBER 630 K @ $0.52/KM SF-B-2015-DECEMBER 46 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2015-DECEMBER 1200 km @ $.52/km SF-P-2015-DECEMBER 20 hrs @ $22.50

Total EFT000000005002

Amount $295.01 $932.05 $634.98 $457.92 $2,319.96

Total Bylaw enf

$2,319.96

Total PP&P

$29,009.77

30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067261

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Total 067263 EFT000000004972

Description

Amount

407 ETR 15/12/18

Total 067261 067263

Vendor

2/16/2016

407 useage

027236

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE LUMBER

C14258-0216

ALLIANCE WIRELESS ANSWERING SERVICE

2/16/2016

$14.17 $14.17 $121.40 $121.40 $208.92

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total EFT000000004972 EFT000000005005 2/16/2016

Page:

5

Page 38 of 231 $208.92

J245715 J288565 J290059 J270000 J278149

GRAND & TOY LIMITED office supplies desk pad binder clips labels office supplies

EPT000813

LOCAL AUTHORITY SERVICES LTD. ENERGY PLANNING 2016

Total EFT000000005005 EFT000000005021 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005021

Total PW OH

$142.73 $47.07 $3.53 $13.20 $127.29 $333.82 $254.40 $254.40

$932.71

3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067266 Total 067266 067277 Total 067277 067284

Total 067284 EFT000000005005

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

V00966

BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) tower rental feb 2016

0912949

MUNICIPAL RISK SERVICES LIMITED ROADS WORKSHOP x 3

11099743 2010446

SKILLPATH SEMINARS MANGEMENT TRAINING B KIRK HANDBOOK FOR MANAGERS

J296795

GRAND & TOY LIMITED EASEL/ INKJET / PROF PHOTO

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005005

Total RdAdmOH

Amount $295.38 $295.38 $424.34 $424.34 $304.26 $39.10 $343.36 $476.18 $476.18

$1,539.26

3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067263

Total 067263 067265 Total 067265 067270 Total 067270 067273 Total 067273 067275

Total 067275 067280

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE supplies 2x12x8 - 3 36 CEILING TILES lumber lumber and plywood

0094337006

BELL CANADA C/O SPECIAL BILLING RELOCATE FOR BELL SERVICES

0072840

EQUIPEMENTS LOURDS PAPINEAU INC PUSH ARM REPLACEMENT

977209

HEAT DESIGN EQUIPMENT IGNITION KIT / SOLENOID

5300233121 5300231802 5300232046 5300226728 5300229865 5300227107 5300226660

K+S WINDSOR SALT LTD 85.93 T @ $84.74 SALT 32.37 T @ $84.74 SALT 37.03 T @ $84.74 SALT 79.16 T @ $84.74 SALT 39.24 T @ $84.74 SALT 42.83 T @ $84.74 SALT 37.72 T @ $84.74 SALT

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

Amount $56.93 $71.74 $219.43 $55.57 $245.13 $648.80 $10,997.54 $10,997.54 $1,093.92 $1,093.92 $388.72 $388.72 $7,409.86 $2,791.31 $3,193.15 $6,826.08 $3,383.72 $3,693.30 $3,252.65 $30,550.07

O. BETTSCHEN

2/16/2016 16-165660

Total 067281

Description

028100 027780 028102 026817 028110

36321 36287 36307 36307 36311 Total 067280 067281

Vendor

21.77 T 5/8” @ $7.90 40.69 T 5/8" @ $7.90 22.26 T 5/8" @ $7.90 106.42 T 3" @ $7.50 78.83 T 5/8" @ $7.90 ONTARIO AGGREGATE RESOURCES SAND & GRAVEL FEE 2015

$175.01 $327.11 $178.95 $812.20 $633.71 $2,126.98 $534.75 $534.75

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

067283 Total 067283 067285

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

2/16/2016

SHELLEY HOME IMPROVEMENTS LUNCHROOM BALANCE DUE + EXTRAS

2/16/2016

2/16/2016

STORRINGTON TAMDEM RENTAL

24191955

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS FIRST AID KIT

16090594 91634686

BENSON TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR SPRING LEAF SPRING

787601

BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS CHAIN OIL

Total EFT000000004975 EFT000000004976 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000004976 EFT000000004977 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004977 EFT000000004980 2/16/2016

Page 39 of 231 $9,468.77 $9,468.77 $954.00 $954.00 $56.30 $56.30 $461.51 $241.12 $702.63 $64.92 $64.92

CANADIAN TIRE 121432

Total EFT000000004980 EFT000000004981 2/16/2016 024692 Total EFT000000004981 EFT000000004983 2/16/2016

TAPE,LADDER,POWEBAR CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT SKYHAWK

$129.69 $129.69 $39.69 $39.69

CINTAS 884707502 884707502 884707502

Total EFT000000004983 EFT000000004984 2/16/2016

supplies mark harrington uniform cory gemmill uniform

$116.52 $13.29 $9.50 $139.31

HOSE AND NOZZLE PARTS

$789.97 $789.97

CLEAN ONTARIO 53964

Total EFT000000004984 EFT000000004986 2/16/2016 15108

CRAINS’ CONSTRUCTION LTD. BELLROCK VILLAGE

7058

D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING 22 BUSHINGS

09613

D.M. WILLS ASSOCIATES LIMITED MASSASSAUGA RD CULVERT

Total EFT000000004986 EFT000000004995 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004995 EFT000000004996 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004996 EFT000000004998 2/16/2016

$499,865.32 $499,865.32 $452.83 $452.83 $465.55 $465.55

EVERTEMP INC 28483

Total EFT000000004998 EFT000000005000 2/16/2016

RAN PIPING FOR PROPANE

$3,154.87 $3,154.87

FISH, DOROTHY 5912

Total EFT000000005000 EFT000000005004 2/16/2016

5 CLEANS @ $75.00

35468

GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC PARTS FOR F53

15109

THE GREER GALLOWAY GROUP INC Engineer consulting dec 2015

INV106601737 INV106632928 INV106640779 INV106644855

HD SUPPLY CANADA, INC BLACK SPRAY PAINT TOOLS - HAMMER DRILL, GRINDER CHAINS EXT CORDS

P21055

JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC. BOLTS

847113685

KAL TIRE ONTARIO REPLACE BROKEN SPRING

9303811213 9303811214 9303839134

KENT AUTOMOTIVE CABLE TIES MISC PARTS COTTER PIN

Total EFT000000005004 EFT000000005006 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005006 EFT000000005008 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005008 EFT000000005010 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005010 EFT000000005011 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005011 EFT000000005012 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005012 EFT000000005015 2/16/2016

6

SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/08-01

Total 067285 EFT000000004975

Page:

KWIK LOAD PRODUCTS LTD.

$375.00 $375.00 $650.35 $650.35 $441.72 $441.72 $71.52 $698.85 $659.14 $112.16 $1,541.67 $32.46 $32.46 $208.69 $208.69 $414.61 $274.99 $40.46 $730.06

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT KININV002269

Total EFT000000005015 EFT000000005017 2/16/2016

REMOTE STARTER INSTALL

967 L @ $.623 1 CASE ROTELLA LUBES 12 10W30 LUBES 83.4 L @ $0.8841 72.01 L @ $0.8841 91.44 L @ $0.8841 92.01 L @ $0.8841 107 L @ $0.8841 73.01 L @ $0.8575 109.52 L @ $0.8575 84.62 L @ $0.8575 108.02 L @ $0.8575 96.50 L @ $0.8398 95.01 L @ $08398 & LUBE 83.01 L @ $0.8398 105.51 L @ $0.8398 90.54 L @ $0.8310 87.24 L @ $0.8221 88 L @ $.8221 8 L @ $0.9460 78.4 L @ $0.7956 82.43 L @ $0.7956 58 L @ $0.7956 1469.1 L @ $0.610 965 L @ $.628

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 2016/01/29-36 5 CLEANS @ $75.00 CLEANINGSUPPLIES cleaning supplies

Total EFT000000005018 EFT000000005019 2/16/2016 DAR 21033045

LIEBHERR CANADA LTD BLOCK HEATER

53527112 53559152 53559159 53570220

LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 WIRE MIG / TIP CUTTING Oxygen ACETYLENE/OXYGEN ACETYLENE/OXYGEN

199152 198091

MCKEOWN AND WOOD FUELS 2857.7 L @ $.6170 2471.1 L @ $.6200

Total EFT000000005019 EFT000000005020 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005020 EFT000000005023 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005023 EFT000000005024 2/16/2016

7

Page 40 of 231 $604.33 $604.33

LEONARD FUELS 0646-675021 1056-676693 1056-678594 1058-676739 1058-675888 1058-676988 1058-677333 1058-677602 1058-677835 1058-678110 1058-678359 1058-678675 1058-679147 1058-679492 1058-679652 1058-680578 1058-680844 1058-681120 1058-681170 1058-681170 1058-681429 1058-681651 1058-681779 1058-677814 1058-675487

Total EFT000000005017 EFT000000005018 2/16/2016

Page:

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 2016/01/29-ANDERSON ANDERSON RD WORK

Total EFT000000005024 EFT000000005026 2/16/2016 896-733276

NAPA UNIVERSAL SUPPLY GROUP CUT OFF WHEEL

A13668 A13072

PAT ROGERS TOWING SERVICE Towing service Towing service

0000128358 0000128256

PAT’S RADIATOR SERVICE LTD. throttle repair HOSE ASSEMBLY

Total EFT000000005026 EFT000000005032 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005032 EFT000000005033 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005033 EFT000000005034 2/16/2016

$680.76 $829.12 $48.84 $73.33 $63.32 $80.40 $80.91 $94.09 $62.23 $93.34 $72.12 $92.06 $80.51 $83.06 $69.25 $88.01 $74.71 $71.21 $71.82 $7.69 $61.88 $65.05 $45.77 $911.92 $616.69 $4,518.09 $375.00 $16.26 $391.26 $212.38 $212.38 $154.37 $11.19 $23.00 $204.13 $392.69 $1,794.23 $1,559.04 $3,353.27 $19,003.68 $19,003.68 $32.80 $32.80 $178.08 $508.80 $686.88 $301.53 $67.65 $369.18

PETRIE FORD 206639 206639

Total EFT000000005034 EFT000000005035 2/16/2016

SEAL BEAM / LED LIGHT BULB SEAL BEAM

76077

PRINTFUSION INC. DRIVING SHEET FORMS

173-100686 173-100971

QUINTE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS BATTERY CABLES LED STROBE

Total EFT000000005035 EFT000000005038 2/16/2016

$64.47 $19.31 $83.78 $376.51 $376.51 $208.47 $302.54

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 173-107199 173-106002 173-105031

Total EFT000000005038 EFT000000005039 2/16/2016

MODEL 10 SURGE 20K LED 4 STOP TAIL RELAY & CONNECTOR

2432349

RIGNEY BUILDING SUPPLIES door X 2

868 140 1030

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND WATER WATER BEDFORD KICTHEN SUPPLIES

69689 56269 56646 56636 56793 56611 56446 56238 56948 200557

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 10 ROUND NOSE SHOVELS HOSE NOZZLE wheelbarrow EYE,HOOK, FASTENERS SHOP SUPPLIES rust paint Kitchen supplies paint & brushes CORD SIGN ROOM STOCK

148180

TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS CANVAS CASE

0000123351 0000123351

WHITE’S WEARPARTS LTD PLOW PARTS PLOW PARTS

Total EFT000000005039 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005046 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005049 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005049 EFT000000005055 2/16/2016

Page:

8

Page 41 of 231 $830.16 $81.81 $28.88 $1,451.86 $201.48 $201.48 $39.90 $23.94 $60.31 $124.15 $203.52 $10.17 $237.07 $38.59 $67.13 $22.25 $76.87 $23.93 $15.25 $131.87 $826.65 $30.52 $30.52

Total EFT000000005055

$906.09 $906.08 $1,812.17

Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl

$601,076.26

3210 Brushing Cheque EFT000000004993

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

DIG’N DIRT LTD. 104494

Total EFT000000004993 EFT000000005016 2/16/2016 30134

FLOAT EXCAVATOR L.D. POWER SPORTS CHAIN & BAR

Total EFT000000005016

Total Brushing

$445.20 $445.20 $230.86 $230.86

$676.06

3215 Drainage Cheque 067280

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Amount

O. BETTSCHEN 36359 36321 36321 36286 36286 36307 36307

Total 067280 EFT000000004993

Description

2/16/2016

70.72 T 5/8 @ $7.90 10.78 T 5/8" @ $7.90 64.59 T blased rubble @ $6.50 57.90 T 5/8" @ $7.90 82.94 T 3" @ $7.50 12.33 T 5/8" @ $7.90 12.24 T 3" @ $7.50

$568.52 $86.66 $427.23 $465.46 $633.03 $99.12 $93.41 $2,373.43

DIG’N DIRT LTD. 104493

FLOAT EXCAVATOR

Total EFT000000004993

Total Drainage

$254.40 $254.40

$2,627.83

3320 should maint Cheque EFT000000004988

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION SHOULDERING

Amount

Total EFT000000004988

$32,043.87 $32,043.87

Total should maint

$32,043.87

90056724

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

9

Page 42 of 231

3405 Washout Cheque 067280

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

O. BETTSCHEN 36285 36329

10.65 T RAP @ $9.00 20.1 T RAP @ $9.00

Total 067280

Total Washout

$97.54 $184.08 $281.62

$281.62

3502 Winter Prop Damage Cheque EFT000000005047

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 56342

Vendor

Description

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 24 mail boxes

Total EFT000000005047

Total Winter Prop Damage

Amount $488.20 $488.20

$488.20

3505 Snw Plwng Cheque 067274 Total 067274 EFT000000004970

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

Description

HOGAN’S SUNRISE SNOWPLOWING INC 16/01 PLOWING JAN16-29 PLOWING / SANDING

2/16/2016 21758

Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000005024 2/16/2016

Vendor

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 49.5 HRS @ $72.50

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 16/01-NEW RD 16/01-NEW RD 16/01-WHITE RD 16/01-WHITE RD 16/01-HENRY RD 16/01-HENRY RD 16/01-BUNKER HILL RD 16/01-BUNKER HILL RD 16/01-DEYO RD 16/01-DEYO RD 16/01 - JAMES WILSON 16/01 - JAMES WILSON 16/01 - TIMMERMAN 16/01 - TIMMERMAN 16/01 - LINDA LORD 16/01 - LINDA LORD

Total EFT000000005024

Total Snw Plwng

Amount $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,651.91 $3,651.91 $1,495.87 $1,048.13 $1,032.86 $1,780.80 $2,065.73 $1,780.80 $691.97 $1,979.23 $11,875.39

$18,827.30

3515 Stock Snd&Slt Cheque 067275

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 5300224256

Vendor

Description

K+S WINDSOR SALT LTD 32.58 T @ $84.74 SALT

Total 067275

Total Stock Snd&Slt

Amount $2,809.42 $2,809.42

$2,809.42

3615 Wayfnd sign Cheque 067263

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 027790

Total 067263 067271

2/16/2016

Vendor

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE 2 x 12 x 12 - 3

Amount $107.61 $107.61

ESKEROD SIGNS 26992 26993

Total 067271 EFT000000005029

Description

2/16/2016

5 PARKING SIGNS 2 ROAD CONDITIONS NORTHWAY HARDWARE AXE supplies

$3,225.79 $1,304.50 $4,530.29

Total EFT000000005029

$40.69 $39.58 $80.27

Total Wayfnd sign

$4,718.17

11277 11278

3625 RR cross mnt Cheque EFT000000004979

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 11081632

Total EFT000000004979

Vendor

Description

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FLASHER CONTRACT

Amount $831.00 $831.00

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total RR cross mnt

Page:

10

Page 43 of 231 $831.00

3635 Trffc cnts Cheque EFT000000005037

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

PUROLATOR INC. 429891052

SHIPPING CHARGES

Total EFT000000005037

Total Trffc cnts

$66.00 $66.00

$66.00

3638 Locates Cheque EFT000000005030

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

ONTARIO ONE CALL jan 1 - jan 31 2016

Amount

Total EFT000000005030

$6.72 $6.72

Total Locates

$6.72

201664579

3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005041

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

R.W. ELECTRIC FIX CAUTION LIGHT

$576.55 $576.55

electrical repairs Change traffic signals

Total EFT000000005048

$352.70 $8,319.90 $8,672.60

Total Street Lights

$9,249.15

30944 Total EFT000000005041 EFT000000005048 2/16/2016

TRUE ELECTRIC 6677 6683

Total Trans

$676,173.57

40 Env 4110 Water Treat Cheque 067264 Total 067264 EFT000000005050

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

BELL CANADA-WATER TOWER PHONE LINE 16/01-N 602 7631 16/01-N 602 7631

2/16/2016

UTILITIES KINGSTON DEC 2015 PLANT OPERATING COSTS

Amount $74.28 $74.28

Total EFT000000005050

$9,676.19 $9,676.19

Total Water Treat

$9,750.47

31126

5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque EFT000000005017

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

LEONARD FUELS

Total EFT000000005017

$70.35 $70.35

Total SW & Fac OH

$70.35

0363-676340

80 L @ $0.8841

5105 Garb coll Cheque 067285

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

2/16/2016

LOUGH GAR SCALES @ $75 X 3 HRS BEDFORD - SCALES

$228.96 $228.96 $457.92

REAR VIEW MIRROR REAR VIEW MIRROR / WHEEL ASY TUNGSTEN BULB

$640.19 $1,112.27 $10.27 $1,762.73

PETRIE FORD 207072 207222 206639

Total EFT000000005034 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 54565 Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005051 2/16/2016

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 2015/12/03-02 15/12/03-03

Total 067285 EFT000000005034

Description

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE gar bags VERSUS BUSINESS FORMS & LABELS

$26.45 $26.45

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 40597

580M Garbage Tags

Total EFT000000005051

Total Garb coll

Page:

11

Page 44 of 231 $7,755.33 $7,755.33

$10,002.43

5110 Gab disp Cheque 067263

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 029816

Total 067263 067285

2/16/2016

Vendor

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE PIPE

2/16/2016

portland dump PORTLAND DUMP RUN DEC 2015

362096

AVERY WEIGH-TRONIX TRUCK TESTING/ TRAVEL TIME

INVI06601733

HD SUPPLY CANADA, INC 40 keyed locks

Total EFT000000004974 EFT000000005008 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005008 EFT000000005036 2/16/2016

Amount $28.97 $28.97

SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/11-03 2015/12/21-02

Total 067285 EFT000000004974

Description

PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000021450 69.54 MT rresi/ici waste

Total EFT000000005036 EFT000000005054 2/16/2016 511051

WHALEY, GEORGE JAN 2016 LANDFILL MAINT

Total EFT000000005054

Total Gab disp

$356.16 $178.08 $534.24 $1,945.65 $1,945.65 $759.94 $759.94 $6,428.05 $6,428.05 $4,324.80 $4,324.80

$14,021.65

5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 067285

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/11-04 2016/01/12-06 2016/01/08-07 2015/12/31-05

SALEM RECYCLE GREENBAY RECYCLE BRADSHAW RECYCLE DEC 2015 GREENBAY RECYCLE RUN

Total 067285

Total Rec Disp/Prc

$534.24 $330.72 $864.96 $661.44 $2,391.36

$2,391.36

5305 HHW Cheque EFT000000004978

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

20160016 20160016 20160016

BRENDAR ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Oil waste for jan 2016 HHW Jan 14 & 28 chemical waste Jan 2016

56681

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE batteries

Total EFT000000004978 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005047

Total HHW

Amount $664.59 $814.08 $844.61 $2,323.28 $3.84 $3.84

$2,327.12

5315 Bale wrap Cheque EFT000000005052

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 C131

Vendor

Description

WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NOV-JAN BALER RENTAL

Total EFT000000005052

Total Bale wrap

Amount $457.92 $457.92

$457.92

Total Env

$39,021.30

70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque EFT000000004991

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016 1070

Vendor

Description

D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS WINTER IINTERMENT x 2

Amount $1,058.30

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total EFT000000004991

Page:

12

Page 45 of 231 $1,058.30

Total Health

$1,058.30

Total Cem

$1,058.30

80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067272 Total 067272 067286 Total 067286 067287 Total 067287 EFT000000004970

Date 2/16/2016

Inv #

FISHER, DAVE 151221-STORRREC

2/16/2016

16/02/03-33

VOTARY, RICHARD SNOWPLOWING 4 @ $65

21761

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. SNOWPLOWING 8 @ $50

Total EFT000000005040 EFT000000005042 2/16/2016

$162.82 $162.82 $260.00 $260.00 $407.04 $407.04 $30.00 $30.00

KOT, JOHN 151221-STORRREC

15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC

$30.00 $30.00

monthly monitoring & rental monthly monitoring & rental

$25.44 $25.44 $50.88

LONDRY ALARMS

PANTREY, AMANDA 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC SEC. ROLLINS, ELLWOOD 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC SMITH, ROBERTA 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC

Total EFT000000005042 EFT000000005044 2/16/2016 9920108 Total EFT000000005044 EFT000000005056 2/16/2016

$30.00 $30.00

15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC

183096 183096

Total EFT000000005031 EFT000000005040 2/16/2016

Amount

FOX, KEVIN 151221-STORRREC

Total EFT000000005014 EFT000000005022 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005022 EFT000000005031 2/16/2016

15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC

UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC fence rental

2/16/2016

Total EFT000000005001 EFT000000005014 2/16/2016

Description

133270344-002 2/16/2016

Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000005001 2/16/2016

Vendor

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 1621.8 L @ $0.8224

WOOD, ALVIN 151221-REC STORR

Total EFT000000005056 EFT000000005057 2/16/2016 50351 50351 50351 50351

15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC

XCG CONSULTANTS LTD. DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING

Total EFT000000005057

Total Rec

$50.00 $50.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $1,377.38 $1,377.38 $30.00 $30.00 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $407.04

$2,895.16

8210 VCA Cheque 067269

Date

Inv #

2/16/2016

Vendor

Description

COLEMAN, DONALD coffee for VCA directors meein

Amount

Total 067269

$9.83 $9.83

Total VCA

$9.83

Total Rec

$2,904.99

2015126

90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque

Date

Inv #

Vendor

Description

Amount

System:

2/11/2016

User ID:

lfragnito

EFT000000004987

9:59:13 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

2/16/2016 AR160007

Total EFT000000004987

CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION RISK MANAGEMENT OCT - DEC

Page:

13

Page 46 of 231 $427.49 $427.49

Total Plan

$427.49

Total Plan

$427.49

Total

$2,071,800.79

Page 47 of 231

Payment Listing For the period of February 17, 2016 to March 1, 2016

Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of February 17, 2016 to March 1, 2016

651,482.30

Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #4

Pay date February 17, 2016 For the period of January 31, 2016 to February 13, 2016

76,070.35

Council Reimbursement

Pay date February 17, 2016

647.02

Council Honorarium

Pay date February 29, 2016

9,795.99

Total Payments

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending March 1, 2016 in the amount of

$

737,995.66

Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer

$

737,995.66

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

Ranges: Cheque Date:

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

11:43:59 AM

From: 2/17/2016

To: 3/1/2016

Page:

1

Page 48 of 231

Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC

10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000005088

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

60295 60267

THE FRONTENAC NEWS FEB 18 AD FEB 11 2016 AD

IN-54404-01

ZYCOM TECHNOLOGY INC. IT Services FEB 2016

Total EFT000000005088 EFT000000005123 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005123

Total Gen

Amount $368.15 $454.55 $822.70 $1,780.80 $1,780.80

$2,603.50

1000 Cheque 067307

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 5811

Total 067307 EFT000000005077

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

SPADA TILE (BELLEVILLE) LIMITED INSTALL CARPET, BASBOARDS

Amount $1,060.34 $1,060.34

CANADIAN TIRE 125004

Total EFT000000005077 EFT000000005078 3/1/2016

DOOR STOPS

$26.73 $26.73

LCD TV

$725.86 $725.86

CDW CANADA INC CDM5598

Total EFT000000005078 EFT000000005083 3/1/2016 0901926

DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY tung heads

24694 24695

SELECT DOOR AND FRAME DOOR INSTALL OFFICE DOOR

28677

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 2404.2 L @ $0.9093

4016

WEMP & SMITH CONSTRUCTION LTD. meeting room carpentry work

Total EFT000000005083 EFT000000005111 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005111 EFT000000005114 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005114 EFT000000005122 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005122

Total

$123.14 $123.14 $128.48 $459.45 $587.93 $2,246.97 $2,246.97 $3,968.64 $3,968.64

$8,739.61

1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000005082

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000045476 FEB 2016 EAP IVC00000000041876 NOV 2014 EAP

Total EFT000000005082 EFT000000005104 3/1/2016 76586

PRINTFUSION INC. MARCH NEWSLETTER 11,0000

3569 3574

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND CREAM & COFFEE CREAM

Total EFT000000005104 EFT000000005118 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005118

Total Clk

Amount $181.67 $173.48 $355.15 $656.40 $656.40 $33.71 $4.39 $38.10

$1,049.65

1275 Fin Cheque 067293

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 STHFT-1602B STHFT-1602A

Total 067293

Vendor

Description

APPLIED GEOLOGICS INC 2016 AGL TCA 2016 CARTELITE SUBSCRIPTION

Amount $508.80 $798.61 $1,307.41

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005098

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

3/1/2016 0003147

MARTIN’S DATA MANAGEMENT 2 shred bag

40685

VERSUS BUSINESS FORMS & LABELS 8 M Self adhesive tax bill env

Total EFT000000005098 EFT000000005121 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005121

Page:

2

Page 49 of 231 $134.32 $134.32 $2,329.41 $2,329.41

Total Fin

$3,771.14

Total GG

$16,163.90

20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067309

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 019227

Total 067309 067313 Total 067313 EFT000000005067

3/1/2016

Description

TIM HORTONS #4458 COFFEE FOR ICE WATER RESUCE

WILLIAMS, KATHY 16/02/19-CLEANING NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB CLEANING

3/1/2016 02500783 02664191

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL FEB 2016 PEST CONTROL FEB 2016

0000126129 PF00766634

AJ STONE COMPANY LIMITED FOAM FIREADE2000 2 WAY BALL VALVE

KP37070 KS15908

KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON SAFE-T-BRAKE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT

1187669

LEVAC SUPPLY LIMITED AIRMAX/BRASS HOSE

Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005070 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005070 EFT000000005091 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005091 EFT000000005095 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005095 EFT000000005113 3/1/2016

Vendor

SNIDER, LISA 16/01/29-CLEANING

Total EFT000000005113 EFT000000005114 3/1/2016 348124 252384

2 CLEANS @ $35.00

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 675.5 L @ $0.7914 1275.2 l @ $0.7814

Total EFT000000005114

Total Fire

Amount $19.18 $19.18 $595.00 $595.00 $42.60 $40.70 $83.30 $3,358.08 $2,348.62 $5,706.70 $27.56 $447.95 $475.51 $123.07 $123.07 $70.00 $70.00 $565.35 $1,035.33 $1,600.68

$8,673.44

2110 Cvc# Cheque EFT000000005112

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SIGNS PLUS 2926

8 CIVIC NUMBERS

Total EFT000000005112

Total Cvc#

$73.27 $73.27

$73.27

2400 Police Cheque 067301

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES policing contract Feb 2016

Amount

Total 067301

$244,876.00 $244,876.00

Total Police

$244,876.00

17160216052

2510 Quinte Cheque EFT000000005108

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 IN000023507

Total EFT000000005108

Total Quinte

Vendor

Description

QUINTE CONSERVATION LEVIES 2016

Amount $101,305.00 $101,305.00

$101,305.00

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

3

Page 50 of 231

2605 Build Cheque EFT000000005098

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 0003147

Vendor

Description

MARTIN’S DATA MANAGEMENT 1 shred bag

Total EFT000000005098

Total Build

Amount $67.16 $67.16

$67.16

2620 Anml Ctl Cheque EFT000000005087

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-AC-2016-JANUARY JAN ANIMAL CONTROL

Total EFT000000005087

Total Anml Ctl

Amount $3,256.19 $3,256.19

$3,256.19

2625 Lvstck Cheque 067297

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FOSTER, ANNETTE 16/01/08-BULLCALF JAN 8 2016 BULL CALF KILL

Amount

Total 067297

$1,067.50 $1,067.50

Total Lvstck

$1,067.50

2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005087

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-RP-2016-JANUARY 1200 KM @ $.52 SF-RP-2016-JANUARY 20 HRS @ $22.5 SF-B-2016-JANUARY 310 KM @ $0.52 KM SF-B-2016-JANUARY 15 H @ $22.50

Total EFT000000005087

Total Bylaw enf

Amount $634.98 $457.92 $164.04 $343.44 $1,600.38

$1,600.38

Total PP&P

$360,918.94

30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067291 Total 067291 067293

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

407 ETR 16/02- 832773875

3/1/2016

Description 407 TRAVEL JAN 20 2016

APPLIED GEOLOGICS INC 2016 AGL TCA 2016 CARTELITE SUBSCRIPTION

Amount $22.72 $22.72

Total 067293

$2,035.20 $3,194.45 $5,229.65

Total PW OH

$5,252.37

STHFT-1602B STHFT-1602A

3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067299

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

GILMOUR’S ON 38 672871

EGGS/BACON/BREAD/BUTTER

Total 067299

Total RdAdmOH

$23.10 $23.10

$23.10

3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067294 Total 067294 067296 Total 067296

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

4855A

ARNOTT BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LTD Holdback release - culverts

0072837

EQUIPEMENTS LOURDS PAPINEAU INC front nose one way

3/1/2016

Amount $21,719.63 $21,719.63 $74.41 $74.41

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

067300 Total 067300 067305 Total 067305 067306 Total 067306 067311 Total 067311 067315 Total 067315 EFT000000005067

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

3/1/2016 2016-008

MACDONALD & EBERHARDT SURVEYING LTD harrowsmith boundary survey

5389

ROAD MAINTENANCE EQUIP & SERVICES SNYDER TANK LID

3/1/2016

3/1/2016

SHAW DIRECT 16/02-200-2483-8027

3/1/2016 00042385

VAUGHAN’S AUTOMOTIVE OIL CHANGE

04C030610-001

TOROMONT INDUSTRIES LTD. HALOGEN LAMP

02397511

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. 12 bait stations keeley

38233862

AECOM CANADA LTD Engineering fees

63799536

AIR LIQUIDE CANADA INC. OXYGEN

787655

BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS Exhaust fluid & drum deposit

024273 024273 024273 024273 024273

CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS

3/1/2016

3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005068 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005068 EFT000000005069 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005069 EFT000000005075 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005075 EFT000000005079 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005079 EFT000000005080 3/1/2016

4

Page 51 of 231 $4,070.40 $4,070.40 $323.60 $323.60 $48.88 $48.88 $85.42 $85.42 $16.85 $16.85 $0.40 $0.40 $4,950.42 $4,950.42 $26.50 $26.50 $150.60 $150.60 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $686.90

CINTAS 884709161 884709161 884709161 884710817 884710817 884710817

Total EFT000000005080 EFT000000005083 3/1/2016

SUPPLIES HARRINGTON UNIFORM GEMMILL UNIFORM SUPPLIES HARRINGTON UNIFORM GEMMILL UNIFORM

0901926

DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY battery

7070

D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING NEW HITCH FOR TRAILER

Total EFT000000005083 EFT000000005084 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005084 EFT000000005085 3/1/2016

$186.23 $13.29 $9.50 $116.52 $14.75 $10.56 $350.85 $43.59 $43.59 $198.43 $198.43

DRAPER DOORS 9070

cables off bay #6 & fuse #4

35580

GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC Cylinder hyd lift and labour

9303843302 9303843301 9303848516

KENT AUTOMOTIVE PARTS SCREW PIN HOSE & RELEASE CABLE TIES

29976

L.D. POWER SPORTS filter & chain oil

Total EFT000000005085 EFT000000005089 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005089 EFT000000005090 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005090 EFT000000005093 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005093 EFT000000005094 3/1/2016

$164.34 $164.34 $7,281.26 $7,281.26 $95.83 $57.70 $1,578.62 $1,732.15 $66.81 $66.81

LEONARD FUELS 3160-673852 3160-677540

Total EFT000000005094 EFT000000005097 3/1/2016 019548 Total EFT000000005097

Feb 7 -Mar 6 satellite

Page:

438.1 L @ $.641 407.9 L @ $.594 M.A. BARR SERVICE STATION FIX BULK DIESEL TANK LEAK

$285.76 $246.55 $532.31 $662.97 $662.97

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005099

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

3/1/2016 200191

MCKEOWN AND WOOD FUELS 1955.2 L @ $0.6120

20160205

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD ANDERSON RD WASHOUT

30281522-B

NATIONAL ENERGY EQUIPMENT INC REEVED UP COMISSIONING

Total EFT000000005099 EFT000000005100 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005100 EFT000000005101 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005101 EFT000000005102 3/1/2016

Page:

5

Page 52 of 231 $1,217.64 $1,217.64 $9,407.71 $9,407.71 $508.80 $508.80

PETRIE FORD 207177

Total EFT000000005102 EFT000000005103 3/1/2016

FILTER

$78.50 $78.50

PIN HITCH/REC REDUCER TIE DOWNS/IMPACT AIR WRENCH socket, torch, butane

$42.70 $336.29 $45.76 $424.75

SHIPPING CHARGES

$109.30 $109.30

PRINCESS AUTO 27-4-102570 27-3-103829 27-1-105178

Total EFT000000005103 EFT000000005107 3/1/2016

PUROLATOR INC. 430192591

Total EFT000000005107 EFT000000005109 3/1/2016 173-107823 173-107554 173-108170 173-105730

QUINTE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS PINTLE MOUNT LED SIGNAL LIGHT PARTS FITTING & AIRBRAKE WIPER BLADES, LED LIGHTS ETC

K540603

SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED ICE MELTER

427951

TALLMAN TRUCK CENTRE LIMITED ENGINE LIGHT ON

2708 3726 3726

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND sugar and cream WATER WATER

57103 53771 57127 500174 500172

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE materials 24 MAIL BOXES 6 BEAVER FORKS SKID OF WATER DEWALT BATTERY

150247

TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS otterbox

Total EFT000000005109 EFT000000005115 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005115 EFT000000005116 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005116 EFT000000005118 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005118 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005119 EFT000000005120 3/1/2016

$116.87 $182.30 $233.81 $318.34 $851.32 $45.64 $45.64 $212.41 $212.41 $5.68 $22.95 $22.95 $51.58 $62.79 $488.20 $343.77 $355.14 $263.56 $1,513.46

Total EFT000000005120

$61.05 $61.05

Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl

$57,668.88

3502 Winter Prop Damage Cheque 067295 Total 067295 EFT000000005072

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

026810

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE mail box and supplies

2440

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE MAIL BOXES

3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005072

Total Winter Prop Damage

Amount $58.72 $58.72 $38.65 $38.65

$97.37

3505 Snw Plwng Cheque EFT000000005066

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 21764 21760 21759

Total EFT000000005066 EFT000000005076 3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 9 @ $30.00 9 @ $55.00 9 @ $30.00 CABINTREE

Amount $274.75 $503.71 $274.75 $1,053.21

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 1030

Total EFT000000005076 EFT000000005092 3/1/2016 2015-13316 2016-13355 2016-13354 2016-13353 2016-13352 2016-13357 2016-13356 2015-13316-2 2015-13255 2015-13254 2015-13317 2015-13314 2015-13315 2015-13318 Total EFT000000005092 EFT000000005117 3/1/2016

4 plows @ $130 K MULROONEY TRUCKING LIMITED 22 @ $154.00 20.5 @ $154.00 16.5 @ $159.00 56 @ $147.00 57 @ $147.00 22 @ $154.00 18.5 @ $154.00 20 @ $154.00 59.5 @ $147.00 53 @ $147.00 22.5 @ $154.00 8 @ $159.00 30.5 @ $154.00 23.5 @ $154.00

Page:

6

Page 53 of 231 $529.15 $529.15 $2,977.50 $3,212.56 $2,669.67 $8,376.88 $8,526.47 $3,447.63 $2,899.14 $3,134.21 $8,900.44 $7,928.12 $3,525.98 $1,294.39 $4,779.67 $3,682.69 $65,355.35

TEM ROADWORK 107902

30.5 h @ $75.00

Total EFT000000005117

Total Snw Plwng

$2,327.76 $2,327.76

$69,265.47

3506 Snow Clearing Sidewalks Cheque EFT000000005066

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 21766 21765

Vendor

Description

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 6 @ $65.00 sidewalks @ skidsteer

Total EFT000000005066

Total Snow Clearing Sidewalks

Amount $396.86 $1,798.61 $2,195.47

$2,195.47

3601 Barricds & Sfty Matls Cheque EFT000000005073

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 24192065

Vendor

Description

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS safety glasses / vest

Total EFT000000005073

Total Barricds & Sfty Matls

Amount $114.99 $114.99

$114.99

3620 Reg signs Cheque EFT000000005119

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 56929

Vendor

Description

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE LUMBER

Total EFT000000005119

Total Reg signs

Amount $85.25 $85.25

$85.25

3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005112

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SIGNS PLUS

Total EFT000000005112

$82.37 $82.37

Total Street Lights

$82.37

2926

3 ST SIGNS

3800 Crssng Guards Cheque EFT000000005063

Date

Inv #

2/29/2016

Total EFT000000005065

Description

Amount

SNIDER, DEBBIE 16/02 16/02

19 DAYS @ $45.00 16/02 SNIDER WSIB

16/02 16/02

MACINTYRE, DOUG 16/02 - 19 days crossing guar 16/02 WSIB MACINTYRE CROSSING

Total EFT000000005063 EFT000000005065 2/29/2016

Total Crssng Guards

Vendor

$855.00 $24.62 $879.62 $570.00 $16.42 $586.42

$1,466.04

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Trans

Page:

7

Page 54 of 231 $136,251.31

40 Env 5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque 067295

Total 067295 EFT000000005106

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

031184 031184

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE FIRST AID KIT GATE HINGE

543

PRO-TECH TRAINING SOLID WASTE DRIVER TRANING X2

57103

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE snow shovel

3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005106 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016

Amount $37.64 $31.29 $68.93 $244.22 $244.22

Total EFT000000005119

$19.32 $19.32

Total SW & Fac OH

$332.47

5105 Garb coll Cheque 067290

Total 067290 EFT000000005062

Date 2/29/2016

2/29/2016

Inv #

Vendor

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ

Description 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ Jan 2016 CPI Increase

Total EFT000000005062 EFT000000005074 3/1/2016 20160204 Total EFT000000005074 EFT000000005102 3/1/2016

BENSON TRUCK & TRAILER WHEEL NUT/STUD

Amount $11,274.39 $9,306.49 $242.70 $200.33 $21,023.91 $11,517.09 $247.93 $11,765.02 $235.78 $235.78

PETRIE FORD 207462 207446 207531

CHECK ASY - DOOR FILTER/EXHAUST EXHAUST PIPE

Total EFT000000005102

Total Garb coll

$70.61 $2,740.01 $207.71 $3,018.33

$36,043.04

5110 Gab disp Cheque 067295

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 031184 031184 031184

Total 067295 EFT000000005061

2/29/2016

Total EFT000000005105

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE GATE HINGE GATE HINGE GATE HINGE

01046176 01046176 01046176 03366622

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. dump pest control dump pest control dump pest control MARCH 2016 PEST CONTROL

84084

ENVIRO-GUARD PLUS INC. rodent control MONTHLY FEE

Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005086 3/1/2016

Total Gab disp

Description

WHALEY, GEORGE 16/02 DISPOSAL 16/02 DISPOSAL

Total EFT000000005061 EFT000000005067 3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005086 EFT000000005105 3/1/2016

Vendor

PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000021474 7.01 MT WASTE 3 BULK 2 SCRAPE 647-0000213928 8.92 MT waste & dump run

Amount $31.30 $31.30 $31.30 $93.90 $1,935.80 $1,935.80 $53.85 $53.85 $53.85 $93.25 $254.80 $42.74 $42.74 $704.53 $904.38 $1,608.91

$3,936.15

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

8

Page 55 of 231

5205 Recyc Coll Cheque 067290

Total 067290 EFT000000005062

Date 2/29/2016

2/29/2016

Inv #

Vendor

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ

Description 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ Jan 2016 CPI Increase

Total EFT000000005062

Amount $12,162.26 $10,605.36 $11,320.41 $261.82 $228.29 $243.68 $34,821.82 $9,907.17 $213.26 $10,120.43

Total Recyc Coll

$44,942.25

Total Env

$85,253.91

70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque EFT000000005064

Date

Inv #

2/29/2016 16/02

Vendor

Description

D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS 16/02

Total EFT000000005064

Amount $875.14 $875.14

Total Health

$875.14

Total Cem

$875.14

80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067292 Total 067292 067310

Total 067310 EFT000000005060

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

W29012

ALEX MCCOY PLUMBING & HEATING SEPTIC LOCATE

133270344-003 134288524-001

UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC FENCE RENTAL FENCE RENTAL

16/02

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/02 MAINTENANCE

3/1/2016

2/29/2016

Total EFT000000005060 EFT000000005094 3/1/2016

Amount $269.46 $269.46 $122.11 $915.84 $1,037.95 $142.50 $142.50

LEONARD FUELS 1361-673384 0838-675214 0838-677815 0838-679549

Total EFT000000005094 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016 500171 56946

310.3 L @ $.628 483 L @ $.628 329.9 L @ $.602 332.6 L @ $0.610 TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE DOCK PACKAGE/ SCREWS NUTS, BOLTS, LUMBER, 26 FLOATS

Total EFT000000005119

Total Rec

$198.30 $308.65 $202.10 $206.46 $915.51 $250.26 $1,663.26 $1,913.52

$4,278.94

8020 Swim Cheque EFT000000005096

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 138159

Vendor

Description

LIFESAVING SOCIETY 2015 SWIM FAILS

Total EFT000000005096

Total Swim

Amount $46.71 $46.71

$46.71

8036 Family Day Cheque 067298

Date 3/1/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

GARRISON, NORMAN K.

Amount

System:

2/25/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:43:59 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total 067302 067303

FAMIL DAY FOOD

$488.94 $488.94

50

8 gift cert @ $25.00

$200.00 $200.00

PIXLEY, CARL 1602-FAMILYDAY

FIREWOOD FAMILY DAY

$100.00 $100.00

3/1/2016

GILMOUR’S ON 38

Total 067303 067304 Total 067304 067308 Total 067308 EFT000000005088

3/1/2016

3/1/2016

3/1/2016

3/1/2016

Page 56 of 231 $375.00 $375.00

1602-FOOD Total 067299 067302

9

HORSE AND WAGON FAMILY DAY

1602-FAMILYDAY Total 067298 067299

Page:

NICOLE’S GIFTS

PIXLEY, JEANETTE 1602-FAMILYDAY FOOD SERVICES FAMILY DAY TAKALA, SCOTT 16/02-FAMILY DAY

3/1/2016 60276

FAMILY DAY COORDINATOR

THE FRONTENAC NEWS FAMILY DAY AD

Total EFT000000005088

Total Family Day

$250.00 $250.00 $200.00 $200.00 $486.77 $486.77

$2,100.71

8210 VCA Cheque 067312

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

VERONA FOODLAND FOOD FOR COMMUNITY RECOGNITION

Amount

Total 067312

$28.24 $28.24

Total VCA

$28.24

Total Rec

$6,454.60

GROC 1520

90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque EFT000000005110

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SAADE, SAMER 149

29 HR @ $30 AGGREGATE / ZONING

Total EFT000000005110

$870.00 $870.00

Total Plan

$870.00

Total Plan

$870.00

99 9999 Cheque 067314

Date

Inv #

3/1/2016 TAXREFUND

Total 067314 EFT000000005081

3/1/2016

Total EFT000000005081

Vendor

Description

DIEBOLD, HELMUT Tax refund 1029-030-020-93655

CITY OF KINGSTON 15/12/31-OVERPMT 2015 arterial roads overpaymen

Amount $2,588.50 $2,588.50 $42,106.00 $42,106.00

Total

$44,694.50

Total

$44,694.50

Total

$651,482.30

Page 57 of 231

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

February 18, 2016

Agenda Date: March 1, 2016


SUBJECT: Tender No. PW-2016-02 - Purchase of One (1) 2017 Tandem Dump Truck. BACKGROUND: One (1) Tandem Axle Dump Truck was budgeted to replace a 2000 Tandem Dump Truck and a tender was sent out. This tender was advertised on the internet, on our website, and in the local paper. This tender closed on January 27, 2016 and twelve bids were received. The results, in ascending order, are as follows: Supplier

Sub-Total

Trade-In

Total

Antrim Truck Centre $258,038.14 (Western Star with ELP Plow Equipment)

$3,000.00

$255,038.14

$288,193.10

Surgenor Truck Group (Mack with Tenco Equipment)

$256,620.00

$1,500.00

$255,120.00

$288,285.60

Cornwall Freightliner $260,011.00 (Freightliner with Tenco Plow Equipment)

$4,000.00

$256,011.00

$289,292.43

Cornwall Freightliner $261,686.83 (Freightliner with ELP Plow Equipment)

$4,000.00

$257,686.83

$291,186.12

Tallman Truck Centre $265,313.79 (International with ELP Plow Equipment)

$7,000.00

$258,313.79

$291,894.58

Tallman Truck Centre $265,937.96 (International with Tenco Plow Equipment)

$7,000.00

$258,937.96

$292,599.90

Francis Canada Truck Centre $262,104.55 (Viking Plow Equipment)

$2,000.00

$260,104.55

Total (Inc. HST)

$293,918.14

Surgenor Truck Group $278,620.00 (Mack with Viking Plow Equipment)

$1,500.00

$277,120.00

$313,145.60

Tallman Truck Centre $288,137.96 (International with Viking Plow Equipment)

$7,000.00

$281,137.96

$317,685.90

Francis Canada Truck Centre $291,244.00 (Freightliner with Viking Plow Equipment)

$2,000.00

$289,244.00

$326,845.72

Kingston Kenworth $316,463.00 (Kenworth with Viking Plow Equipment)

$7,500.00

$308,963.00

$349,128.19

Surgenor Truck Group $318,918.69 (Volvo with Viking Plow Equipment)

$2,500.00

$316,418.69

$357,553.12

ANALYSIS: The Municipality tendered for a Tandem Dump Truck, similar to previous years. Last year an automatic transmission was proposed, rather than the traditional manual transmission. It is estimated that Automatic Transmissions currently are specified in 50% of Heavy Truck tenders and will continue to grow with the change of demographic of the workforce. Benefits include better fuel efficiency and less driver fatigue. An amount of $250,000 was budgeted this year to

Page 58 of 231

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

account for the steady increase in the USD based on the price paid last year of $237,157.74, plus HST. This increase was not substantial enough to cover the 40% USD increase. The submission of the lowest bidder, Antrim Truck Centre, has been evaluated for completeness and accuracy. While the Municipality does not currently own a Western Star other local Municipalities have purchased the model submitted in the last year and have provided good feedback on their experiences. Staff also took the opportunity to travel to Greater Napanee and demonstrate their 2016 Model Western Star with good results. For these reasons, and also because their tendered price is $92.50 lower than the bid from Surgenor Truck Centre, the Public Works Department recommends awarding the tender to Antrim Truck Centre, for $288,193.10 including HST. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $250,000.00 has been approved in the 2016 Capital Budget for the purchase of a current model Tandem Dump Truck. All of the submissions provided exceed this budget, which can be attributed to the steady increase in the USD. The Capital Budget figure submitted did not reflect this level of increase as it was not foreseen. The net increase in the budgeted amount of $250,000 is $9,527.32 when taking into account the Municipal Rebate on the HST. Sufficient funds exist in the Equipment Replacement Reserve to fund this purchase. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approves the submission from Antrim Truck Centre, for Tender PW2016-02, tandem dump truck complete with Snowplow Equipment, in the amount of $255,038.14, plus HST.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

David Holliday Area Supervisor

Page 59 of 231

PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council

Planning Department

Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 19, 2016 File: RC-15/01 Subject: Closing of Road Allowance in Between Concessions IX and X and Between Lots 30 and 31, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Mahmud


Summary of the Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass a by-law to stop up, close and transfer ownership of a portion of two unopened road allowances between Concessions IX and X and between Lots 30 and 31, District of Bedford. Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a road closure and transfer of ownership to an abutting property-owner. A public meeting was held on September 15, 2015 on the application as required under the Municipal Act. This report includes a location attachment, a letter from the owner requesting the closure, a map illustrating the portions of road allowance to be closed and a by-law to close and sell the land. Background & Discussion: By letter dated March 26, 2015, the property-owner at 306 Campground Lane requested to know whether Council would agree to the closure and sale of two portions of unopened road allowance that abut his properties. Attachment #1 shows the location of the owner’s properties and Attachment #2 is a copy of the letter requesting Council’s consideration of the closures. Council may remember that this request came to the Committee of the Whole on June 9, 2015 where members were generally in agreement with the closures. Since that time the owner scaled back his proposal and is now proposing to acquire the two portions shown on Attachment #3. The final lot configuration, after the closures and ownership transfers, is shown on Attachment #4. Burridge Road is a forced road which was constructed to the east of the road allowance that it would normally have followed, presumably through more acceptable topography. The effect of this alignment is that many sections of the road allowance are redundant- meaning that they will probably never be used by the Township for roads. Because of this, portions of both of these unopened road allowances have already been closed and sold as seen on the attachments. A public meeting on the application was held on September 15, 2015 and no concerns were expressed. Since then the owner has completed a survey identifying the subject portions of road allowance and., accordingly, the proposal is now ready to be finalized and a by-law passed to close and transfer the ownership. Agency Comments: The Public Works Department has no objection the closures. No comments were received from the public at the public meeting.

Page 60 of 231

Conclusion: The road allowances do not lead to water and thus it appears that they would probably not be useful as a future road or access for the public. Thus, it appears that the closing and sale of the portions of road allowances is an acceptable land use decision. The property-owner will acquire more usable land and the Township would benefit from the funds received from land that would never be used for municipal purposes. For Council’s information, the applicant must pay $8,525.00 to the Township which is the total cost of the land. The by-law may be passed at this time but the actual land transfer would only take place when a deed is prepared to transfer the land. Staff will not stamp the deed until the applicant has paid the full cost to the Township. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council Pass By-law No. 2016-11 to close and sell a portion of the unopened road allowances identified as Part 1 and Part 3 on Plan 13R- 21244 lying between Concessions IX and X and between Lots 30 and 31, Lot 25, District of Bedford. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments MahmudRoadClosureReport3

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

Page 61 of 231

Page 62 of 231

ATTACHMENT #2 Townsliip of South Frontenac Planning Department P.O.Box , 4432 George St. Sydenliani, ON KOH 2TO Attention Mr. Lindsay Mills 26 March, 2015 Dear Mr. Mills,

Enclosed is a plan showing road allowances (coloured in yellow) and a 2 acres lot, (coloured in orange) with a house on it. Please help me in doing the following:

1 . I would like the Township to close the road allowances numbered 1,2 &3 and sell them to me.

  1. Exchange the road allowance (coloured in yellow) and numbered 1 with a new road allowance (coloured in blue) and numbered 2.

  2. I am assuming that the 2 acres lot has been severed, what would be the annual property tax on it? A copy of the 2015 Interim Tax Notice for the whole property (92 acres) is enclosed.

Sincerely, ,/l e? '

,‘11

Qasem Mahrnud,P.Eng. Phone: 613-723-1698

Email: qmahmud33@Igmail.com Mailing Address:

1 Castlethorpe Cres Ottawa, ON K2G 5P6

Page 63 of 231

ATTACHMENT #3

Oi

l[)

I

(

s

?

Y/’,

!==4 ?l

?l

:};

?-l -l -I

?

a=

.1

?l -I

t=i?

‘7

Page 64 of 231

ATTACHMENT #4 FINAL LOT CONFIGURATIONS

01

D

r

‘!, Pa

,S ?l

-I

’l;

=l yl

-l 1.

ffi

IIJ a?

Th, -l 1

sr

Page 65 of 231

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council

Planning Department

Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 18, 2016 Subject: Assumption of a Road Widening: Part Lot 12, Concession X, Storrington District, Ramparts Road; Township of South Frontenac:


Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass By-law Number 2016-16 to assume a road widening as a common highway.

Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a by-law to assume as a public highway a road widening that was dedicated to the Township as a condition of a consent application.

Background & Discussion: In 2001 a new residential lot was created by consent on Ramparts Road in Storrington District. During the survey work for the new lot, Ramparts Road was surveyed and discovered to be undersized in terms of width and, thus, a road widening was identified and was dedicated to the Township. However, it has been brought to the attention of the Planning Department that the road widening was never assumed as part of Ramparts Road as a highway. Attachment #1 shows the location of the road widening. The attached by-law is a by-law to assume the road widening.

Recommendation: It is recommended that By-law Number 2016-16 to assume as a common and public highway lands identified as parts 2 to 8 inclusive in Plan 13R-16242, be passed. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

attachments RoadAssumptionBylawReportRamparts

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills,

I

I

Page 66 of 231

4ffacA*rht a/

p

t

I)

RAMPARTS LANE -d

E

,‘U

Jessa4, W

%

m

q€€

7

I?

1

(I

,?

,,/

toughborough Lake

t

l

? 1

11 MNburn Cri /'<

Page 67 of 231 PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016

Planning Department

Date of Report: February 16, 2016 Subject: Severance Applications at Petworth Road, Portland District: Possible Parkland Dedication: Kerr


SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that Council receive a Planning Report dated February 16, 2016, for consideration and discussion regarding a request to dedicate parkland on Petworth Road in the Hamlet of Petworth. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring back to Council a proposal to require the dedication of parkland instead of cash-in-lieu as a condition of approval of two severance applications. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2015, property-owner Chris Kerr submitted applications to create two new waterfront residential lots on the Napanee River in the hamlet of Petworth. The parcel is accessed from Petworth Road. Proposed Lot #1 would retain access and frontage on Petworth Road while the other proposed lot would be accessed by a private lane to be constructed through Lot #1. The retained portion would have its access from German Road to the west of the severed portions. Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land and Attachment #2 shows the proposed lot layout. The proposed lots would each be approximately 4.5 acres in size and would meet all of the minimum standards for waterfrontage and road/lane frontage. The applications were advertised and came before the Committee of Adjustment on December 10, 2015 for a public meeting and were given conditional approval. However, at the meeting there was some discussion as to whether the remains of the old historic Petworth Mill building that is located on the subject land should be acquired by the Township for preservation and possible future renovation. As a result of this discussion it was agreed to include in the conditions of final approval of the applications wording that cash-in-lieu or parkland will be taken by the Township to fulfill the parkland dedication requirement under section 51.1 of the Planning Act. The matter was brought to the Committee of the Whole on January 12, 2016 where the Committee was asked to consider whether parkland (containing the Petworth Mill building) should be taken instead of the normal cash-in-lieu. However, the Committee thought that we should determine what our liabilities are in assuming this land. They also considered that the building should be fenced-off to prevent vandalism and trespassing, if the Township were to acquire it. It was concluded that the liability issues and the cost of fencing the building should be considered before making any decision. Thus, decision was deferred and staff were directed bring back a report to address these items. Discussion The Petworth Mill is one of several mills built by Stephenson and Lott in the 1840’s. As discussed at the Committee of Adjustment meeting, the structure may or may not be worthy of preservation but, in any case, this would be the opportunity for the Township to acquire it for future renovation purposes and at

Page 68 of 231 least preserve it until its future can be determined. Attachment #3 is a series of photographs of the remaining structure. It should be noted that a portion of the structure appears to already be located on the township-owner road allowance as shown on Attachment #4 shows the location of the structure partially on the road allowance. The Planning Department sought advice from the Township’s solicitor on the issues around liabilities. By e-mail dated February 1, 2016, our solicitor advised that we have a statutory duty to not create a danger and to not act with reckless disregard for persons. He further states that the most prudent course of action would be to fence the area off and not allow access. This way, we would be much better able to defend any claim against us. He advises that signage is also important. A copy of the e-mail is attached as Attachment #5. The fencing costs have now been determined to be approximately $18,500.00 based on information from Public Works on a recent similar job. This would be an 8 foot high chain link fence with barbed wire complete with gate. Attachment #6 lists the typical hardware. Any signage would cost approximately $200.00. RECOMMENDATION Now that an estimate of fencing costs is provided, Council is asked to consider whether parkland (containing the Petworth Mill) should be taken from the subject land as a condition of approval for the consent applications instead of the normal cash-in-lieu of parkland. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachment KerrParklandReportToCofW2016

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

Page 69 of 231

Attachment #1 r

N

I

W&

I

l

I

W" s

l

I

l

l

l

l

l l

l

l

r. 11

/)

l

i

14]

)

r

]

l

%

?’lL)1

?

-’[J @l

A

‘./ //

7

I

I

%,

l

l I I

/

,g

I

l

l

Il

-?

‘=Jd

I /l

I

’l/I

I i

!

?’s

?‘S

I

i

l

//

l

r

r

8 eL ’ ?l

m

rr

l

‘Napanee Rrver

! l

l

t

l

I

I

I

l l

l

l

I

l

l I

l

l

l

I

t

I

l i

l

l

i i

l l l

)

I

/

/’

i

1

r

l

T

I

e

I

l

I l

l l i

I

/

l

/

I

i

l I

l l

/

li l’

l(

Meters

) 80160 320 480 640 l

l

r

l l

l l l

Page 70 of 231

Page 71 of 231

Page 72 of 231

i

l

l

wa

r

f l! icH? 117i ‘-

Nm 1.1

mi m r m fflla

A ] alls

l

i

i

I

t

l s s

r I

l

t

r

l

z

i

I

s

l

i

l l l

l

i I

l l

I

r

I

s

/i

f/’

k

r l

STRUCTURE

r

l

l

l

j

/l

‘1 rAJ r l l l

?

m?‘DAtl"-OWANCE ' k !=?

I

I

pe?

l

(

l

i

t

7 h

t

l

l

i

7

l

l

/

li

r

r

(

/

l

J

I

/

I

/ Il

I

/

r

/

/

l

l

/

l

l

t

/

/ r 11

l

l

/l l

r I

j

‘L.J

ATTACHMENT #5

Page 73 of 231

Lindsay Mills From:

Tony Fleming tfleming@cswan.com

Sent:

Fffibruary-01-16 2:38 PM

To: Cc:

Lindsay Mills Wayne Orr

Subject:

RE: Proposal to Accept Parkland Containing a Heritage Building

Lindsay,

The Township’s liability, should it acquire this property, would be as set out in the Occupier’s Liability Act. The Act creates two classes of liability depending on the use being made of the property.

  1. If the Township allows access to the property by the public it has a statutory duty, “to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises” (section 3 of the Act);
  2. If the Township fences off the area and does not permit public access, the duty provided in section 3 does not apply and the Township only has a statutory duty, " to not create a danger with the deliberate intent of doing harm or damage to the person or his or her property and to not act with reckless disregard of the presence of the person or his or her property" (s. 4 of the Act).

Given the obvious state of disrepair of the former mill property, it would seem the most prudent course is to fence off the area and allow no access. This will allow the Township to rely on the Iess stringent liability found in section 4 of the Act. This is not to say that the Township would not have liability to persons who may be injured, but a claim would be easier to defend. It would be prudent to consult with your insurer to advise that the property has been acquired and to see if they have any requirements for reducing lability. In additional to fencing the property should be posted with appropriate signage warning of the obvious dangers and prohibiting any access by the public.

We also considered whether the Province could designate this property under the Ontario Heritage Act without the Township’s consent. It is possible for the Province to designate a property as having heritage significance under the Heritage Act. If the Province believes that the property is of significant heritage interest and meets eight criteria set out in Ontario Reg. 10/06, it can designate the property. The Township would have the right to appeal pursuant to the Act. Section 52 (1) would also allow the Province to designate the property without relying on the criteria found in the

Regulation, but using this power requires the Province to pay compensation to the owner of the property; it is unlikely that the Province would ever use this power in relation to this site.

Overall, we believe the risk to be very Iow that the Province would attempt to designate this site is a heritage site. We

come to this conclusion based only on the difficulties posed’in the legislation. If the site is of important historic significance, that would change this assessment.

l hope this information is of assistance. Should you require anything further or have any questions please Iet me know. Thank you

Tony Fleming c.s.

Certified Specialist in Municipal Law (Local Government/Land Use Planning & Development) Partner Cunningham, Swan, Carty, Little & Bonham LLP T 613.546.8096 F 613.542.9814 1

Page 74 of 231

ATTACHMENT #6

TYPICAL GATE AND FENCE HARDWARE List of Materials

Terminal Posts 3-1/2" Dia x 1 3’-6" Sch 40 Line Posts 2-3/8" Dia x 1 2’-6" Sch 40

Sonotube 1 2"x 48" Sonotube 1 2"x 48"

Top Rail 1-1 1/16" Dia x 21’ Sch 40 Top Rail Sleeves 1-1 1/16" Brace Rails 1-1 1/16" x 132"

Wire 2" x 9ga Galvanized 96" Top Rail Ends 1-1 1/16" Line Post Caps 2-3/8" x 1-1 1/1 6" f/ barbed wire Centre Bands 3-1/2" w/bolt & nut Centre Bands 2-3/8" w/bolt & nut Offsett Bands 3-1/2" w/bolt & nut Tension Bands 3/16" x 3/4" x 94"

Terminal Post Caps 3-1/2" Cap-Corner f/ Barbed wire-3-1/2" Tightners-Ratchet Wire-Barbed 12-1 /2ga per ft Galvanized Wire 9ga per ft Aluminum Fence Ties Coated 8-1/4" x 9ga Concrete per Metre Misc Hardware Gate 12 ft w/ Hardware

Date: 08/02/2016 Filename: South Frontenac-8ft Fence Budget Price-cust

Page 75 of 231

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016

Planning Department County File No. 10T-2013/002

Date of Report: February 23, 2016 Subject: Draft Plan Conditions for Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession VII, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac: 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant)


SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council receive the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016, and forward the report and all attachments to the County of Frontenac as representing the Township’s conditions of draft plan approval for the proposed thirteen lot plan of subdivision by 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant) in the Hamlet of Hartington. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a plan of subdivision located in the Hamlet of Hartington. The plan proposes thirteen (13) residential lots and, as Council is aware, it has been changed from its original layout brought forward in July, 2015 where forty-seven (47) lots were proposed. A public meeting was held on July 7, 2015 on the original application as required by the Planning Act. This report includes a location map attachment, a lot layout plan, 3D images and reports supporting the development. Draft plan conditions are also attached. BACKGROUND Earlier in the year an application was brought to Council for a forty-seven (47) lot residential plan of subdivision in the Hamlet of Hartington, Portland District. An associated zoning by-law amendment was also presented for the new proposed residential uses. Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land partially within the Hamlet of Hartington. The County of Frontenac is the authority for final approval of subdivisions. The Planning Act requires that a public meeting be held on these types of applications and the County requested that the Township hold the public meeting on the subdivision as required under the Act. Accordingly, this public meeting was held on July 7, 2015. Feedback received from the public meeting indicated that there were concerns with developing the entire subdivision at the density proposed. The public comments focused on five major concerns namely:

Page 76 of 231 The revised plan and proposed draft plan conditions were presented to the Committee of the Whole on November 24, 2015. At the meeting additional concerns were raised by the public through delegations. The concerns related to:

the direction of stormwater drainage which may affect neighbouring homes and overwhelm the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain System;

the high level of nitrates in the soil which may affect well water in the Plan and in neighbouring wells.

The discussion below concerning the revised plan now appears to address both sets of concerns noted above. DISCUSSION Comparing the revised plan with the former plan, the development would maintain the originally proposed layout in the north portion of the property with a new internal road (accessed from Boyce Road) on which all lots would front. The two parkland blocks have been removed along with the stormwater management block. Stormwater would now be directed away from the thirteen lots by way of ditches directing flow south through a right-of-way to the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain. Some drainage would also be directed northerly to Boyce Road. All lots would be a minimum of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) in size and would have 46 metres (151 ft.) of frontage. Cash-in-lieu of parkland is now proposed. The revised plan is shown on Attachment #2 and Attachment #3 is a three dimensional rendering of the final development indicating how it would fit within the existing community. It should be noted that the layout of the revised plan is designed to accommodate a future stage of development on the remainder of the existing acreage to the south, however, if and when this proposal comes forward it would constitute a new subdivision application requiring the normal full process for approval including a new public meeting. REVIEW The following is a review of relevant provincial and township documents and all information received on the proposal along with the Planning Department’s comments noted in bold type. General The area to be developed is 11 hectares (27 ac.) in size. The majority of the land may be characterized as being mainly flat having been tilled for crops in the past. The K&P Trail abuts the full eastern boundary from north to south and along this boundary are mature stands of trees that form a canopy over the trail. A farm exists on the abutting land to the west. The area to be developed is located fully within the Settlement Areas designation (Hartington) of the Official Plan. The location of the subject land generally appears to be well suited to accommodate residential development within the Settlement Areas Designation where the Official Plan prefers development to occur. Access to the subdivision would be by way of an entrance onto Boyce Road at the north of the development. A single new road would connect through the development providing the frontages for the lots and their direct access. The new road would be constructed to Township standards, with a turning bulb at its southern extent and would be dedicated to the Township. From a Planning perspective this is an appropriate layout for a residential subdivision in that traffic can be directed through an existing collector road to a nearby arterial road (Road 38) minimizing traffic volumes on the local roads. This layout scenario proposes development on a fully

Page 77 of 231 maintained public road properly constructed to provide efficient road maintenance. As noted above, a Township-maintained drainage ditch referred to as the “Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain System” is aligned east to west through the property to the south of the development. This passageway channels stormwater from neighbouring properties and directs it to a wetland approximately 5.5 kilometres to the west of the subject land. The drain must remain undeveloped and accessible to the Township for purposes of periodic maintenance. Accordingly, the developer has proposed that most of the stormwater be directed through ditches southerly to this drain to accommodate runoff. This scenario appears to be logical in that it ties in the stormwater management of the subdivision with the already established Pleasant Valley Drain. Public Works advises that they are satisfied that the Preliminary Stormwater Management Report dated August 10, 2015, sufficiently addresses drainage. It should be noted that there are legal matters associated with tying in new properties with the municipal drain. These will need to be addressed prior to final approval of the subdivision. All the proposed lots would be a minimum of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) in size and all would have a frontage on the new road of a minimum of 46 metres (151 ft.). The proposed sizes are supported by the hydrogeological study and terrain analysis (peer-reviewed) which determined the allowable density of the development and the configuration of the lots which would allow for appropriate building envelopes. Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement of 2014 provides policy direction from the province on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS states that efficient land use and development patterns should support sustainability by promoting strong, livable, healthy and resilient communities etc. Section 1.1 of the PPS says that developments should avoid land use patterns that prevent the efficient expansion of settlement areas in those areas which are adjacent to or are close to settlement areas. Also, developments should have patterns that are cost-effective and built to standards that minimize land consumption and servicing costs. The proposed development appears to be consistent with the direction of the Provincial Policy Statement in terms of its location and, as outlined above, the development pattern/layout is efficient and cost effective for maintenance, servicing and emergency response. It would not require expansion of the Hartington ‘Settlement Areas’ designation. Official Plan Referring to Attachment #1 of this report, the site is located where it can be accessed from a fully maintained public road and is in proximity to other residential development in the hamlet. As mentioned, it is fully within the ‘Settlement Areas’ designation boundary of Hartington. It is Council’s intention that the majority of new growth in the municipality will be directed to existing settlement areas where it can be supported by appropriate servicing. Single detached dwellings located on lots developed through a plan of subdivision are envisaged as the preferred method of development. The subdivision proposes thirteen residential lots all serviced by private water and septic systems and fronting onto a road to be constructed to Township standards and to be assumed by the municipality as a public road. In addition, the subject land is in a location where similar residential development has occurred and, despite an existing farm operation and a barn located to the west, there appear to be no incompatibility issues.

Page 78 of 231 In this regard, the subdivision seems well located and is near existing commercial uses in and near the village. It is also compatible with adjacent established residences and proposes recreation opportunities by providing a linkage with the existing K&P Trail. Consequently, the subdivision’s location appears to be fully in accordance with the intent of the Official Plan. Zoning The FoTenn consultant would zone the land to a special Residential Zone (R-28) to permit the residential use of the lands and to recognize the frontages as proposed at only 46 metres. Planning staff generally agree to this zoning scenario for the reason that the Comprehensive Zoning By-law reserves the Residential (R) zoning strictly for plans of subdivision lots and the minimum lot size of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) is specified in this zone category. The Planning Department can support the reduction of the normally required minimum lot frontages from 76 metres to a lesser frontage. This support is for two reasons: (1) The Official Plan, in section 7.2 (d), specifies that the minimum lot area and lot frontages of the plan of subdivision may be reduced if it is demonstrated through the subdivision process that reductions to these minimums can be justified based on good planning principles. A hydrogeological study and terrain analysis was undertaken to support the plan and it determined that there is enough water to accommodate the proposed density with the proper separation between septic fields and wells. This forms the basis to reduce the frontages. (2) The Official Plan policies relating to the land within the boundaries of the Settlement Areas designation do not suggest any minimum frontage requirement – presumably to allow increased densities here. From a planning perspective of course, this does not warrant that inappropriately small frontages are to be contemplated but the Official Plan is a guide and it does provide flexibility in this regard. Further Planning rationale is provided by FoTenn consultants in a letter, dated October 9, 2015, attached hereto as Attachment #4. Technical Studies Various studies were prepared and submitted in support of the original fortyseven lot development proposal and are still applicable. These studies consist of:

Page 79 of 231 In response, by letter dated October 29, 2015, ASC Environmental provided a response to the comments from McIntosh Perry. Some of the findings of note from ASC are as follows. Five of the original eleven test wells for the hydrogeological testing are located within the area of the thirteen lot development. The ASC review states “The pumping tests conducted on test wells TW02 and TW10 during August and September 2014 were undertaken following consultation and recommendation by Malroz Engineering and Quinte Conservation Authority to assess water supply during seasonal summer-like conditions. These wells were pumped for periods of 6 hours at rates of 20 litres per minute to account for seasonal variables in accordance with MOECC D-5-5. Results of the pumping tests clearly demonstrated water supply sufficient to support seasonal peak demand conditions. We are of the opinion that the test well pumping tests conducted in August and September, 2014 represent stressed conditions.” ASC further concludes that they agree with Malroz and McIntosh Perry that a higher level of investigation was warranted and, accordingly, they have advanced test wells, conducted additional field work and developed an analytic model to assess impacts demonstrating a level of investigation exceeding the minimum requirements on the MOECC D-5-5. ASC is committed to having each well installed at the site evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist. They concur with Malroz that all of the above work exceeds all ministry requirements and demonstrates long term water supply for the proposed thirteen lot subdivision to be developed in the north portion of the property. They also acknowledge that when further development is proposed, clearly, further terrain assessment will be required. A copy of the ASC, October 29, 2015 assessment is attached as Attachment #5. Councillor Sutherland has asked that the results of each well evaluation required above be shared with the public. Agency Comments The Planning Department’s comments are outlined above. However, Planning also wishes to make note of a concern for the stand of mature trees forming a canopy of shade along the K&P Trail on the east boundary of the subject land. Although it appears that the trees are located wholly on the Trail lands, the importance of maintaining these trees as an amenity for the trail-users and to enhance the general appeal of the subdivision lands should be emphasized and controls should be put in place to ensure the trees are conserved. Accordingly, Planning is recommending that a fence to demarcate the rear boundary of the lots abutting the trail be constructed to ensure that the boundary of the trail land is known and thereby to help protect the trees. Also, Planning will require a walkway link from the subdivision directly to the K&P Trail to provide formal pedestrian access to and from this amenity. Public Works appears to be generally supportive of the subdivision layout and finds the access areas to the subdivision to be acceptable. Also, as noted, they are satisfied that stormwater drainage is addressed by the Preliminary Stormwater Management Report. Public Works and Planning are recommending that the new road be paved with asphalt and that a sidewalk also be required from north to south on one side of the new road given that the development is within the hamlet designation - an urban setting. It is also required that services be installed underground within the road allowance of the new road. Public Comments One of the concerns from the public that was not addressed in the discussion above is the adverse effect on adjacent farming operations. The concern is that, with this residential development, any new well must be at least 1000 feet away from existing barns meaning that abutting farms would not be able to expand in the future ecause they would be near these new wells.

Page 80 of 231 This concern is well-founded because the Minimum Distance Separation Formula (MDS 2) would apply to prevent or severely limit any new farm facilities for animals from locating near these new residences. As a further note on Minimum Distance Separation, in terms of building near the existing barn on the abutting property to the west, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs’ Guidelines explain that, when any residential development is proposed within an area designated Settlement Areas, the MDS calculation need not apply. This is the case in the subject development as it is located in the Hartington Settlement Area. Additionally, the OMAFRA Guidelines provide that, if there are already four or more residences located closer to the livestock facility than the new proposed residences, then again, the MDS calculation is overruled and would no longer apply. Planning has included a condition in the attached draft plan conditions requiring that the final subdivision agreement include a clause notifying all prospective purchasers of the lots that a farm operates nearby and that related odours may be experienced. It is also noted that the hydrogeological report took the existence of the farm use into consideration during testing on the eleven wells drilled to determine whether ground water contamination from farm animals and the farm operation in general, would affect the water quality of the new wells. The report, peerreviewed, still came back with a positive recommendation. Concerns noted above regarding nitrates and hydrocarbons in the soil have been addressed by previous reports, notably Malroz Engineering and more recently, by letter dated December 3, 2015 from the firm of ASC Environmental. This letter concludes that:

adjacent residential septic systems and agricultural operations clearly have no potential for adverse influence on groundwater quality from nitrates in the soil, and

regarding hydrocarbons, there would be no adverse impacts from the property located at Holleford Road and Road 38 (former gas station) on the proposed Hartington Development.

In addition, letters dated January 18, 2016 and January 28, 2016 from Specialized Onsite Services Inc. (SOS) note that groundwater flow from the former gas station site is to the northeast ie., in the opposite direction from the subdivision and that no hydrocarbon impact was ever observed in supply wells at adjacent properties. Further, remediation work that was performed at the site in 2015 which involved excavation and removal of more than 250 tonnes of material has significantly reduced the potential for hydrocarbon migration. They conclude that the potential is very low that hydrocarbon impact from the site would migrate to the proposed wells in the subdivision. The SOS letters were also reviewed by Malroz Engineering who, by letter sent to the Township on February 19, 2016, agreed with the findings and confirmed that groundwater analyses conducted by SOS and Cambium Inc. revealed petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was below laboratory detection limits. Copies of the above letters are included hereto as Attachment #6. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended: A. That Council receive the recommendations contained in the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016 and approve the following list of recommended conditions as representing the Township of South Frontenac’s ‘Conditions of Draft Plan Approval’ for the thirteen lot Plan of Subdivision by Terry Grant, in the Hamlet of Hartington:

Page 81 of 231

  1. That this conditional approval applies to the draft plan of proposed subdivision dated September 18, 2015 prepared and certified by Forefront Engineering Inc., and Smith & Smith Surveyors, comprising a total of thirteen residential lots, two blocks and a new street.
  2. That the owners of the subject land enter into a subdivision agreement with the Township of South Frontenac, prepared to the satisfaction of the municipality, to be registered on title of the subject land.
  3. That the road allowance included in this draft plan shall be identified as Street ‘A’ and shall be constructed to Township standards for new public roads with paved asphalt surfacing and that the road be dedicated as a public highway.
  4. That the new internal road identified as ‘Street ‘A’ be named to the satisfaction of the municipality.
  5. That Boyce Road be upgraded at the entrance to the subdivision to the Township’s satisfaction to facilitate ingress and egress.
  6. That Centralized Community Mail Boxes be installed at a location on the road allowance of Street ‘A’ near the entrance to the development at Boyce Road along the west side of the road allowance of the new road and to the satisfaction of the Township and in accordance with Canada Post specifications.
  7. That a 0.3 metre reserve be identified by survey along Lot 13 where the lot abuts the road allowance of Boyce Road and at the south end of Street ‘A’ and around the circumference of the turning bulb at the south end of Street ‘A’ to be held in trust by the municipality for the purpose of denying additional access onto Boyce Road and the undeveloped lands to the south.
  8. That the Owner install a 1.5 metre wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of the new road allowance from the northern limit of Street ‘A’ (i.e., from Boyce Road), to the southern limit of Lot 7.
  9. That a 1.5 metre high black continuous chain link fence be installed along the rear lot lines of Lots 7 to 13 abutting the K&P Trail to protect the existing mature stand of trees on the trail lands.
  10. That the owner convey up to five percent of the land included in the plan to the municipality for park purposes. Alternatively, the municipality may require cash-in-lieu for all or a portion of the conveyance.
  11. That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed subdivision conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the zoning is satisfactory to Quinte Conservation Authority.
  12. That all conditions outlined in the letter dated June 2, 2015 from Quinte Conservation Authority to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality including the requirement for a draw down test for each individual well to be installed and including testing to confirm that nitrate levels are at an acceptable level.
  13. That, the subdivision agreement include a requirement that any abandoned wells must be decommissioned according to MOECC guidelines.

Page 82 of 231 14. That the recommendations outlined in the letter dated December 12, 2014 from KFL&A Public Health to Terry Grant Construction 1278804 Ontario Inc., be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality for the thirteen lot development. 15. That, prior to final approval, a Final Stormwater Management Report and detailed engineering drawings addressing grading, drainage and stormwater management be submitted to the satisfaction of the Township and Quinte Conservation Authority for the thirteen lot development. The site drainage, design, construction and maintenance shall be in accordance with the recommendations contained in the final Stormwater Management Report, with all final designs incorporated into the subdivision agreement. 16. That all legal matters associated with tying the stormwater from the development into the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain system be resolved to the satisfaction of the Township. 17. That all requirements and recommendations specified in the Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analyses Report, dated October 31, 2013, from ASC Environmental, updated by covering letter dated October 7, 2015 from ASC Environmental, and all associated drawings be complied with for the thirteen lot development. 18. That the recommendations of the Natural Heritage Report, dated August 27, 2013 from Ecological Services, be complied with for as they apply to the thirteen lot development. 19. That all entrances to the lots including entrance culverts be located and constructed to the satisfaction of the Township. 20. That all servicing including Bell, Hydro etc. be installed underground. 21. That all recommendations of the Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1 & 2) Reports, dated September 16, 2013 by Archeworks Inc. be implemented to the satisfaction of the Township for the thirteen lot development. 22. That, prior to final approval, street lighting shall be installed to the satisfaction of the municipality including lighting at the turning bulb at the south end of the development and at the entrance to the development at Boyce Road such lighting to also illuminate the mail boxes to be located there. 23. That the Subdivision Agreement include text to the satisfaction of the Township, which text shall be registered on the title of all lots, that all Agreements of Purchase and Sale include provisions advising that a farming operation exists to the west and that adverse effects may be experienced. 24. That, prior to final approval, a 3.0 metres wide walkway be constructed along the south lot line of Lot 7 from the south end Street ‘A’ to the K&P Trail to provide access from the subdivision to the Trail, such walkway to be constructed to the satisfaction of the Township, to be paved 1.3 metres wide with asphalt and to include a 1.2 metre high continuous black coloured chain link fence along the full length of the walkway on both the north and south sides 25. That, prior to final approval, the municipality shall be satisfied that all servicing issues are resolved such as road, sidewalk and walkway construction.

Page 83 of 231 26. That prior to final plan approval, the Owner shall submit a Landscape Plan which provides for one tree to be planted by the Owner in the front yard of each of the lots (Lots 1-13) as well as a planting area or screening buffer of trees along the side yard of Lot 13 where it abuts the road allowance of Boyce Road all of a type, size and location as specified in the Township’s Site Plan Guidelines. 27. That, prior to final approval, a six foot high board screen fence be installed along the north side lot line of Lot 1 for a distance of 70 metres westerly from the new street to provide a measure of privacy in the rear yard of the abutting existing residential lot on Boyce Road. 28. That the owner agree in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise of the municipality concerning the provision/upgrading of roads, installation of services and drainage, in accordance with the municipality’s standards and procedures.

B. That the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016, including attachments, be forwarded to the County of Frontenac as representing the Township’s conditions of draft plan approval for the thirteen lot Hartington Plan of Subdivision.

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills Prepared by: Lindsay Mills, attachments HartingtonDraftPlanConditionsToCouncil

Page 84 of 231

&

Attachment #1

W

lllmllm& s ia *

s -wa

n

m

! i nl

fl

‘!

M

?=}aVld4 .OY[;t Kupu

[] t

lllillmllwlllmll

s s w # F? s s s @ s * i

r’

Li

I

.ThJHamlet Boundaryl

illmllmlll

r

l

r?x

l

l

.?AMIE5(IN ta)AU

nr

TWORH-lKtJAu?

[7

w

-I

]

h

l n

n

C3[

ff

.!l!) 01

‘fi-1 ‘FORD’ KOAu..eub t

-? a - . . . ,

iADW

‘?

s

0 wa w

[] air s

[1 w wa

(]

ff?

!?’! wx

[1 s

o

i.l

m

u

El

[] w wa

n

l 1

?-‘r

Page 85 of 231

ATTACHMENT #2 i

i’ ‘r J I’

‘-J

11 K7P OIJ?

?i

.ia?

?-l -2)

RED UNDER 4NNINC ACT k

a-l

s Hwe An Intetgst

:tui Hydto

l7:?’

LOT 4

11

i:?

‘11

r

i

i?’

Ama :0.80 he

ra

:ORPORA TION

(

i’

( .=?

BVIDED r ARE

.?’l’,’

? <l

.s.

l

.1,4" i (? X .a??? '

l

i I ‘.

i.

( .H

E

–??t

??’- -L’o /a??’ /?

il ?

l

I,‘a

l’-?

’l

la

l l

f’

a?’ I ?.!%p’l? 4 .? -0.4-lr’

l

l

C

a,l ,,,/ a

r

-l k

=-,l-

it t

Page 86 of 231

kl

1’l

l

l

l

T

l

l

r

ffl

@’ L F)’? ff,‘111 lfflm&‘J’al

r

1111

WF

l’

1

l

r

t

l

I

W

l

it

l tli( r?

L

I

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

t

n

!

1

l

i

l) l

I

l 1

I

11

L

l

t

!j

l

11

l

il

l

i

s

i

l

‘14

it

l l i

i

I

l

t i

z

l

l

1

l

ll

m

I

l

l

l

l

i

t

i

{l

o’ LT=’

l

l

l

I

Fl!l

l

l

l t

‘1

ll!i

=‘nJ U

i

z

l l

l

l

I

J

t

’l i!

t

l z l

s

2p-!=-:!f’-J2,

I

l l

t

l

?

I

i l

l

l

l

i

l

e

-’=’-F..'=

i

t

i

.“i:a

l

I

l

s

I

l

l

l

I i

l?

l l

t

‘-‘7-.=-’

I

s

r

l

l

i i

l

l

i

I

l

l

l

l

t l

I

a

l

l

I

r

I

I

i.

l

l

l

l l

I

T

I

l

[1d

it Im m!!!W %i [m il iil

l

t

f?Nl

l

s

l

l

t

l

l

I

i

l

I

ll

l

i

l

l

I r

I

l

t

s

l

i

1

II?J lai

ll

l

ATTACHMENT #3

? Proposed Lot Fabric 00 Existing Lot Fabric

L.

‘al !

%#

M

%;

d

;*

l

r

2

N

j

.’%

%

11 11 s ffi.

’l

!l

?

g

‘)A l

%-

l& N

a l

%=

$5 m

11’

41

k

(%Vl

d

V

s

l *

%

i l z

r

l

l

l

‘%

€%-’:-

=@a -@@-

wagfih I

M?

%”

W

1

l l

l

l i

l

l l

l

l t

r J

p

-*

7 p

0?’

%

<

A

l

l

yw

? 1 r

l

l

7

40!? !

i l t l t

r

l

l

l l

%.

7

r

l i [1

l

l

i I

? Proposed Lot Fabr!c ? Existing lot Fabric

l-)L,ANNiNG BRiEF ! HA,R-l-INGTON S(-18DlV)SlONi ZBA & DRAFI- Pl.-AN OF SL)BDIV?SION

8

Page 87 of 231 *

ATTACHMENT #4

The Woolen Mill

6 Cataraqui St, Suite 108 Kingston, ON K7K 127 613.542.5454

fotenn.com

October 9, 2015

Joe Gallivan

Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road

Glenburnie, ON KOH 150

Re: Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment Planning E!rief

Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac File Nos.: 10T-2013/002 and Z-15/03

Dear Mr. Gallivan,

The following submission is being provided to advise the County of revisions made to the proposed residential subdivision in Hartington. The original application sought to create 50 new blocks, including 47 residential lots, two parkland blocks and one stormwater management block. This letter is intended to supplement the original planning rationale, dated June 11, 2015, which was submitted in support of the development applications. Feedback received during the Statutory Public Meeting and through written correspondence indicates there are concerns with developing the entire subdivision, due to the fact that the property is Iocated partly within a settlement area and partly witt’iin the rural area. Concerns were also raised regarding vvater quality and quantity.

The applicant has thoughtfully considered this feedback from the community and has reduced the subdivision to 13 residential lots, all of which will be located within the existing hamlet boundary. The remainder of the lands will not be part of the subdivision

application and will remain rural. When the applicant pursues the development of the

southern portion of the property in the future, the planning process will trigger further consultation with the County and Township Council, staff and the Public. OVERVIEW OF REVISED DESIGN

As seen in Figure 1 below, the reviser3 plan now includes 13 residential lots, a road and the remainder of the lands are not part of the Plan of Subdivision. The two parkland blocks originally proposed have been removed along with the stormwater management block. Stormwater will be directed away from the 13 lots by enhanced ditches. The proposed new road will terminate at the end of Iots 6 and 7. The right-of-way will continue south for stormwater management purposes, providing a direct connection from the proposed roadside ditches to the existiiig Pleasant Valley Muriicipal Drain. Cash-in-Iieu of parkland will be provided instead of the originally proposed parkland blocks.

r"I…Ai’iNlNG BRIEF ? HAR’ilNGai-Otll SLIBr)IS/)SION ? ZBA & DF!AFT Pi-AN OF SUBDlVISIOl’%l

Page 88 of 231

TECHNICAL CONSIDERAT?ONS

Hydrogeology

ASC Environmental has reviewed the revised draft plan and has provided an updated analysis for the proposed 13 residential lots. Based on MOE guidelines, a minimum of 3

test-wells is requir6a for sites up to 15 hectares (the reduced development area is

approximately 11 hectares in size of the 45 hectare property). Currently, five drilled wells are present in the area proposed for development and a sixth well is immediately south and adjacent to the now Lot 7. On this basis, sufficient wells are in place to address the hydrogeological conditions for the proposed Hamlet development. W@,%er Supply

Pumping tests vvere conducted on the test wells in 2013 and 2014. VVater supply has been assessed during spring and summer conditions with pumping test results from the s existing wells confirming sufficient water supply to support development of the 13 proposed Iots within the Hamlet. Based on the hydroeological work completed to date (and confirmatory peer reviews), ASC is of the opinion that the well driller’s pumping tests for the remaining 8 Iots will be sufficient to assess potential well yield to confirm long term viability of each lot. Water Quality

Existing groundwater chemistry data from the test wells identified that treatment for common aesthetic parameters and health related parameters may be necessary in the Hamlet portion of the property. Bacteriological parameters are not a concern. During individual lot development, disinfection is recommended as a minimum to ensure safe drinking water for domestic consumption purposes and retaining a water treatment

specialist to confirm treatment options for the identified aesthetic and health related parameters that may require treatment.

?

Water levels vvere measured in test wells and observation wells in the northern portion of the property during pumping tests conducted in March 2013, August 2014 and September 2014. The results indicated a positive response during all three test times and exceeded the requirements of MOE’s guidelines.

Based on these results ASC is of the opinion that the hydrogeological analysis conducted to date and the evaluation of new wells by a qualified hydrogeologist is sufficient to adequately characterize long term water supply of the proposed 13 lot residential development.

Stormwater Management

As noted above, stormwater is proposed to be managed through enhanced ditches. Rear ditches will be provided along the east and west property lines to capture runoff from the rear portions of the proposed Iots. The proposed roadside ditches would still capture runoff from the roadvvay, driveways, roofs, and front portions of the proposed lots. These roadside ditches would be extended northerty to Boyce Road to

accommodate any future road drainage works envisioned there. The existing low lying area adjacent to the rail trail in the northeast corner of the site will still be drained through a ditch along a side lot line to the proposed roadside ditch. At the south limit of the road, a Iinear enhanced ditch will be extended southerly to the Pleasant Valley Drain.

This lot-slope, grass Iined, flat bottom ditch will be designed to provide ‘4tormvtater quantity and quality control for the 13 lot development. Side and rear ditches as well as Pl-A.NNlNt3 BR)EFI HAR-i-INGTON SUBi)MSIOhii ZBA & DRAFT PL.AN OF SUBDlVfSION

3

Page 89 of 231 1

lot grading would be detailed on the engineering drawings and in the subdivision agreement.

A final Stormwater Management report will be completed with detailed design. Environmental Impact Statement

An Environmental Impact Assessment was prepared by Ecological Services dated August 27, 2013. This report assessed the natural features on the property to determine significance in accordance with provincial and municipal Iegislation. The work included site visits and analysis of aerial photography. Conclusions of the assessment include: *

No threatened or endangered species within the subject property Bobolinks observed on adjacent properties, hovvever they are known to be tolerant of nearby human activity and the proposed subdivision will not constitute a negative impact to this species

There are no wetlands within 120 metres of the proposed development area There are no areas of natural and scientific interest within 120 metres of the proposed development area

0

There are no valleylands within 120 metres of the proposed development area Existing woodland is not of significant size, habitat, proximity to a significant natural heritage feature, linkage, groundwater discharge area, or diversity to be considered significant in the context of provincial or municipal regulations. The subject property does not contain any significant woodlands.

Tt’iere are no significant wildlife habitat present within the proposed development area

The findings of the previously prepared Environmental Impact Assessment are not impacted by the revised draft plan of subdivision. Traffic Impact F?evievv

A Traffic Impact Review was completed by AECOM on S.@ptember 2, 2015. Trip

generation rates rom the ITE Trip Generation Manual (9 Edition) were used to estimate the number of trips generated by the development. Traffic Counts along Road 38 were also utilized in their findings including turning movements. AECOM’s traffic counts vvere consistent with the counts provided by the Township.

The additional traffic qenerated by the residential development represents less than 10% of the total traffic along Road 38. With such low volumes of new traffic, no impact to the existing traffic operations is expected. It was also determined that there should be sufficient gaps in the traffic along Road 38 such that northbound left turning vehicles on Road 38 will be able to access Boyce Road with little delay. Comments from Quinte Conservation

Quinte Conservation has accepted the development subject to two conditions:

  1. Any new development on the subject Iand should demonstrate that postdevelopment flows do not exceed pre-development Ievels for design storms from the S-year to 100-year events. In addition, the Level 2 (normal) water quality protection storage criteria set out in the Ministry of the Environment Stormwater

PLANN)NG BRIEF :, HARTiNGTON S()BDI’:/lSIOi'41 ZBA &. DR.AFT Pl.-AN Ol= SUBL)lVISiC’iN

zi

Page 90 of 231

Management Planning and Design Manual (2003) should be utilized for this application. Please note, staff have reviewed a covering letter provided by Forefront Engineering Inc. (dated August 10, 20i5) and agree with the conceptual stormwater management design. We suggest however, that the Municipality consider the need for an easement over all drainage features (including rear lot swales) with access from Municipal property. Please contact Christine McClure, Water Resources Technologist at 613-968-3434 x 130 for further information regarding stormwater management comments.

  1. Quinte Conservation suggests that a hydrogeological study be conducted which includes a baseline survey and evaluation of potential impacts on groundwater. We recommend that the consultant utilize the guidelines set forth in the Ministry of Environment (MOE) document titled ‘216905 D-s-s Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment (1996)’ and, ‘216904 D-s-4 Individual On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment (1996)’. Please note, staff have been in discussion with the consulting hydrogeologist and the Municipality’s peer review agent. Please contact Mark Boone, Hydrogeologist at 613-968-3434 x 120 for further information regarding the hydrogeological comments.

PLANNING CONSIDERAT?ONS

The subject property is regulated by the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-Law. !t is currently zoned within the “RU” Rural Zone which permits a range of uses including agricultural and related uses, single-detached dwellings, and other uses which are considered compatible with rural areas. There is a small area of “Environmentally Sensitive Lands Overlay” on the west side of property which requires an Environmental Impact Assessment with any development application (completed with the initial application). The existing and surrounding zoning is shown in Figure 2 below.

Pl-ANI’!ING BF’:liEF : I-IART?NG’T-ON S(.)BDR/ISIONIZBA & DRAFT Pl-AN OF SUBDR/ISION

.)

Page 91 of 231

?

l

, See Schedule E Hartington

UCI

LLJ I

l

wa

FloHice Fktl

l

?

r

v

1

1

k

’n

n

11 t l

i

r

l

l

luci-l

t

l

I l

t I

ltl

l

I

lt

l

Property

r

-L%

l

Siibject

l

11

I

l

l

l

I

l

t

l

t

l

I

I

L

l

l

11

t

’l

J

11

lcisp k"l

r

l

r

‘I

i

‘?

l

l

l

l L?

l

.10.All%Q..iJ(ig)ip 00 hcsicuuvnky zow? iai llUll.kL ZOI’lF illu.’

‘.NAT[nrllOl-ll nESIDEN{:AL l.OltE lllla7 {.lMilTD S’.AVl’:i IlCTilD!:I’lTlAl. ZONE llll.sl

l

‘1

t

-’?

IFlAl’klRkRV IJ!‘F ZrnlF

U?IIIAN INI?US IIIIAI. iDNk IUII

? pirr*-zc’vcini Pl!?’.l'20N&kTY!}

ul.{l n:+s sbiwce pesiot:bniy. . wmrwirosi+ rove imsiyi 05 rwprcv?ii? ztisc ioi.i IIMI IEO SERV:Ci-. llESlci’ENslAl ? lSl.AND ZOl*e iRLSit

OIIARRV ?li ’ lOyl’ tOBi

Rh81l}[?Il’lAl 711’lF IRj

WASIP (l:SP(ISAI- ZONF. lsM!’:

Jlllil l l 101)Ig Ilr XlllE+l’l IAI ?C??IF ll.ll llki

1.1(iBrs+l IEulrklNl’iAy . 141lToT DflN?l {V .anNE iklll l l

IRI?{AN RESIIXN IIA{ ? SlCoND DEN!‘1lY 20NE IUll2) ull}iAN Isl’.l+ llPl.E RESCENrlAk IONF IU!.lla.j

‘§ffl TIU?IAI coz*yepcihi. zouv llle) RC’JkCAl IONAI. l’T[SORT ‘..Clkl M[ nC.lAl. 2CN’lE i RC !

01 uia@y ct)vihvrciht ZONE iuci I?URAI. lNDllS7RlA+ 20011 i;11

.QALVAGE YAIID INDUST?IIAI ZONE llili

‘fflffl cawuyirr yr.r.iyny zow- icvi ClPEll SlaACe ? Pua(IC ZOLI? 11)S! CW!l SPl.CL ? l’l’llVMr ?(M lllRPi

rM’vM{GllrYlllAkLY SENsll’M.’ l.llNDS CNCllkl8 Cl!VlllOl€-I.VNla{ n!IrrTeCLluL]2CNr krPl

iSee gkVlbn S :l7 101 CM?l?Dmnkl willlin
LlNlRONlAElsrALLV 8F)181l’lE IANDSI

" ’ l HA?AIF?R

Figure 2: Current Zoning

We are proposing that the 13 residential lots be zoned a site specific Residential “R-28’ zone which is an established zone within the Township. The remainder of the larids would be zoned the existing ‘RU’ Rural Zone (Figure 3). The table below provides a comparison between the parent Residential zone and the amendments necessary for the site specific zone.

Parent R Zone

Minimum Lot Area: 8,000 m

Relief Necessary .

-’-0.80 hectares 48,000-m’) -

No

46m

Yes - Request reduction to

2

Minimum Lot Frontage: 76 m

Provided

a minimum of 46 m

Troritaqe.

PLAN!‘ilNG BPIEFI ldAR l-li’lGTON SUBDMSIONI ZBA. & DR.A=i l- PLAN OF SUBD?V?SION

6

Page 92 of 231

Minimum Yard

Development will meet

’ Requirements ’ these requirements. Frorit Yard: 20 m

F2ear Yard: 10 m , Int. Side Yard:6 m Ext. Side Yard: 10 m

Gross Floor Area (min): 89 sq. m

Maximum Building Height: 11 m

Maximum Lot Coverage:

, 20%

Development will meet these requiremerits. Development will meet these requirements.

No relief requested

Development will meet

No relief requested.

No relief requested.

.1

’ these requirements. l-….. -.-…….. -……. . … -…..-.-

Frontage Reduction

The Draft Plan provides O.8 hectare lots with a minimum Iot frontage of 46 metres. Overall, the draft plan is consistent with the general intent of the Official Plan and as such, we believe the relief requested for the zoning amendment is justified. Proposed residential lots will be located on private services and at O.8 hectares (2 acres), each Iot has sufficient space to meet the required setbacks for well and septic systems, including a back-up tile bed. Lots will also contain sufficient space for those wishing to have accessory buildings or accessory uses such as a swimming pool.

By providing sufficiently sized lots on a municipal road and by maintaining all other provisions of the Residential ‘R’ zone, the subdivision will achieve a scale and character similar to that of the surrounding hamlet. The images below provide a sense of the how the proposed subdivision will appropriately integrate with surrounding uses. It is important to note how much smaller the existing residential lots, but that the character is maintained with these small lots by providing a similar frontage to the existing Iots.

Pl…Al’!NING BR?EFI HARTINGTON SUBDR/IS?ON : ZBA & DRAF?r F?LAN OF SUBDIVISION

-.’

Page 93 of 231

aa-

=.. $!a

i

?tt

&Th

II?W ;.1

g

FW

a

HFI

t!

ta

-W’?l.?.

r&

nq

Th IW’i

+Q

al’

N

*m??i

%w?

-;l

? ‘@g lljiffli f m ‘%’

aJ a e

!!l

( :!F?

As seen in the images above, the frontages proposed are consistent with the general character of the area. They are also consistent with other decisions made in the Township to reduce frontage within the hamlet areas. Some examples include:

R-10 - Lyons Landing, 55 m R-11 - Bedford District, 60 m R-18 - Gilbert, 30 m R-21 - Deer Creek Phase 2, 35 m R-25 & R-26 - Valleyview Estates, 25 m R-27 - Ouellette, 50 m R-28 - Willowbrook Estates, 52 m

In summary, the only provision requiring relief is the Iot frontage, which is proposed to be reduced from 76 metres to 46 metres. The reduction will not disrupt the functionality of

the subdivision nor will it result in a Iot fabric that is out of character with the surrounding area.

The site specific zoning text will read:

R-29 (Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of Portland)

Notwithstanding anything in this by-law to the contrary, the Iands zoned Special Residential (R-X) shall be used only in accordance with the following: i. The minimum lot frontage shall be 46 m (150.9 ft). it. All other provisions of this by-Iaw shall apply.

PLANNING BF’!IEFI HAF:":lNG’i ON SLlBDl’l/ISIONI ZBA & DRAF’T Pl?.AN OF SUBDIVISION

9

Page 94 of 231

-) J 1% ?l

R-29 ll 11 11 =l

l

‘I l

l

.1

r

l

l

I

i

l

l

l

I

ll

l

l

l

11 I

l

:l it

RU

la

i

l

il

l

ll-

a

l

’l

l

’l .1

l

41

-lt-.-.-. -o

Figure 3: Proposed Zoning

Pl?Ah-‘NING BRIEFI HARTINGTON SUBDi’y/ISION : ZBA 8=t Dt-!AFT PL?AN OF SUBDlVlSIOiSl

10

Page 95 of 231

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of comments received from the public, the applicant has significantly reduced the scale of the proposed subdivision. The original proposal, which included 47 residential lots, two parkland blocks and one stormwater management block has beeri reduced to 13 residential Iots all located within the settlement area of Hartington. Lands Iocated outside of the hamlet area will remain as rural and will be subject to an additional planning process when the owner proposes future development options for the lands.

Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 613-542-5454 extension 221.

Sincerely,

ffi?s,.?? Mike Keene, RPP MCIP

Manager Policy + Development FOTENN Consullr,nts Inc.

PI?ANNING BRiEFI HARTING?-ON SLJBDl’v"lSIONI ZBA & DRAF’i PL?AN OF SUB[)R/ISION

l’i

Page 96 of 231

[?

ATTACHMENT #f

October 29, 2015

Via: email

File: ASC-095 ll61

Mr. Terry Grant T. Grant Custom Homes 946 Woodbine Road

Kingston, ON K7P 2X5

Subject: Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Response to Technical Comments from Mclntosh Perry Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hamlet of Hartington, Ontario Dear Mr. Grant:

We present our comments on the technical review from Mclntosh Perry regarding the above captioned properly. We reviewed the following documents:

Review Technical Support Documentation - Hartington Subdivision, Part Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (MP File No. OCP-15-O397), prepared for Ms. Michelle Foxton, Mr. Charlie Larbarge and Mr. John Lesperance, prepared by Mclntosh Perry, dated September 1, 2015.

Review of Mclntosh Perry Letter Dated September 1, 2015 Review Technical Support Documentation - Hartington Subdivision Part Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (MP File No. OCP-15-0397), prepared for County of Frontenac, prepared by Malroz Engineering, dated September 24, 2015. We offer the following comments in order of Mclntosh Perry Technical Review: 1.O Comments

Pumping tests were undertaken in March 2013. Four (4) test wells were pumped simultaneously on March 19 and another four (4) on March 21 , 2013. Three of the eight test wells (TWO1 , TWO2, TVS/03) are located in the proposed 13 Lot subdivision and test well (TWO4) is located immediately south of the proposed development. These wells are representative of the expected water supply available for the proposed 131ots.

491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1,/9

(sqs) 634 - 5596

Page 97 of 231 Page 2

File: ASC-095 1161 T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON

October 29, 2015

Precipitation the month preceding the March, 2C)13 pumping tests primarily consisted of snow fall. Referencing the Hartington Station approximately 30 mm of rain fall occurred the month preceding the pumping tests and approximately 47 cm of snowfall. At the time of the pumping tests, snow cover was still observed on the ground and sheet flow was also noted in areas over the frozen ground surface. We acknowledge that the March, 20’l3 pumping tests are not representative of typical summer Iow supply seasonal conditions. We note that the pumping tests were conducted to stress these wells to assess performance during early seasonal conditions.

Test wells TWO1 and TWO3 were pumped at rates varying from 20 Iitres per minute up to 60 litres per minute during the March, 2013 pumping tests generating approximately 25,000 litres of water. This is equivalent to approximately 14 Lots (14 times the daily requirement for a 3 plus one bedroom residence). Test wells TWO2 and TWO4 were pumped two days later generating approximately 42,000 Iitres of water; equivalent to 23 Lots (23 times the daily requirement). The pumping tests demonstrated that sufficient quantity of water is available to support residential development within the Hamlet.

Approximately 134 mm of precipitation (rain) was recorded at the Hartington Station the month preceding the summer pumping tests in 2014. Mclntosh Perry identified 156 mm of precipitation the month preceding the summer pumping tests. It should be noted that approximatily 46 mm of the rainfall was recorded on one day.

Based on our infiltration calculation for annual precipitation, approximately 20% is available to the aquifer. If we take 20% of the monthly rainfall prior to summer 2014 testing (134 mm) then W! have approximately 27 mm of precipitation aaa ala= infi trating the ground, “-a? or 27 L/m , which when mul’ tiplied by the proposed site area of 11 Ha, gives us approximately 3,036,000 L of precipitation infiltrating the ground suface the month prior to testing.

The average aquifer thickness of test wells TWO1 , TWO3, TWO9 and TWI 0 is 27.4 m in summer 2014. This multiplied by the site area (11 Ha) and then

multiplied by the porosity of Iimestone which Freeze and Cherry report up to O.2 gives 6.0258 x 1 048 litres available in the aquifer. If we use a conservative porosity of limestone (0.1 ), we have approximately 301 ,290,000 litres available in the aquifer for pumping. The contribution from precipitation the month preceding the summer pumping tests in 2014 is approximately 1 % of the total amount of water available in the aquifer. This clearly is not a significant contribution to the aquifer prior to the summer pumping tests.

[?

491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1J9

(613) 634 - 5596

Page 98 of 231

File: ASC-095 ll61 T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 1 3 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON

Page 3

October 29, 201 s

MOECC D-s-s, Section 4.3.I Pump Test Procedure requires the pumping test must begin with a static water Ievel and must be performed at a fixed rate (+5%) for a minimum period of six hours. The minimum duration of six continuous hours incorporates safety factors with respect to seasonal variables. The pumping tests conducted on test wells TWO2 and TW1 0 during August and September 2014 were undertaken following consultation and recommendation by Malroz Engineering and Quinte Conservation Authority to assess water supply during seasonal summer-like conditions. These wells were pumped for periods of 6 hours at rates of 20 Iitres per minute to account for seasonal variables in accordance with MOECC D-s-s. Results of the pumping tests clearly demonstrated water supply sufficient to support seasonal peak demand conditions. We are of the opinion that the test well pumping tests conducted in August and September 2014 represent stressed conditions.

Referencing Mclntosh Perry Technical Review, they acknowledge that “the pumping test conducted for test well TWO2 demonstrates that it has an adequate yield”. Also the additional work conducted to date clearly supports long term water supply assessment in accordance MOECC D-s-s procedure. 2)

Mclntosh Perry acknowledges that test well (?iWO2) demonstrates adequate yield to support residential develepment.

We concur with Malroz; the Precambrian granite is not intended for use as a water supply aquifer in the evaluation of the development. 3)

The MOECC Procedure D-s-s, requires a minimum of a 6 hour pumping test and that at least one water sample is to be collected in the last hour of the test. We concur with Malroz that collection of a second sample is at the discretion of the consultant. During pumping tests, samples were collected following measuring raw water to be free of chlorine residual. Second and or final water samples from the

eleven wells analysed were typically targeted for collection in the Iast hour of the pumping tests.

We concur with Malroz that the water quality data generated to date from the test wells sampled and, the recommendation that each new well be evaluated, are adequate for characterizing the raw water quality.

[’;?

491 0’ConnorDtive, Kingston, ON K7P IJ9

(613) 634 - 5596

Page 99 of 231 Page 4

File: ASC-095 1 1 61 T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments

Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON

October 29, 2015

Based on our field groundwater monitoring information to date and monitoring of adjacent residential wells, groundwater flow gradient in the area is primarily to the south. Neighbouring residents to the east and north east along Boyce Road and near Highway 38 in the vicinity of the gasoline retail outlet demonstrate a north to northeast/east component of groundwater flow; away from the proposed subdivision. The gasoline retail outlet in question was renovated in 2013, including removal of underground storage tanks, upgrading to double walled tanks and replacing fuel distribution piping. We understand the site was certified by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority indicating the retail outlet is in compliance with Provincial regulatory environmental approvals.

Residential neighbours north, south and east of the retail operation have been present for over 20 to 50 years. During our hydrogeological study, neighbours were solicited to participate in the hydrogeological study. We typically received concerns regarding potential hydrogen sulphide odours in the water supply. No concerns were raised by adjacent residents regarding petroleum hydrocarbon odours in the water supply, clearly indicating the adjacent retail fuel outlet is not a concern.

On this basis, and taking into account recent upgrades (2013) to the gasoline retail store and demonstrated groundwater flow gradient away from the proposed subdivision we are of the opinion that concerns to water supply quality from the retail outlet are not warranted.

Mclntosh Perry identified the walking trail (former K&P railway) located east of the proposed subdivision as a potential concern to future development. We understand the walking trail (forrner rail line) has been in use for recreational purposes in some form since the late l980s. The trail was officially opened in August, 2012. The former rail bed is over 100 years old and ceased operation in 1983 and tracks removed circa 1986. Referencing the County of Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan 2009, a residential survey was taken to gauge environmental, economic and general concerns regarding proposed upgrades to the trail. Reviewing the responses from existing residents adjacent to the trail, no environmental concerns were identified regarding potential impairment of water quality to wells resulting from the former rail bed. This is further supported from our residential survey conducted in support of the hydrogeological study, where no concerns were identified regarding water quality issues resulting from the former rail bed.

491 0’ConnorDrive, /Gngston, ON

[g,$,]

K7P 1J9

(613) 634 - 5596

,g

Page 100 of 231

Page s

File: ASC-095 1161 T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses

October 29, 2C)15

Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON 5)

Quinte Conservation in discussion with Malroz indicated that a Provincial

Groundwater Monitoring Network well is Iocated in the vicinity of Hartington. Mr. Mark Boone, Hydrogeologist with Quinte Conservation confirmed as a part of the water quality evaluation program in the area, that water analyzed for radionuclide did not identifya concerns. On this basis we are satisfied that radionuclides in the water supply are not a concern for future development. 6)

We have reviewed the nitrate-nitrite concentrations for the eleven (11) test wells sampled for the full 45 hectare property. Five of the eleven sampled test wells are located in the northern portion of the property proposed for development. Nitratenitrite results ranged from O.1 mg/l to 4.21 mg/l with the majority of the results falling into two ranges (0.1 - 0.75 mg/I and 1 .5 - 3.0 mg/l) with one result of 4.21 mg/l (TW1 0); confirming nitrate-nitrite variability. We believe the nitrate concentration detected at TW-10 is an outlier and not representative of background concentrations at the property. We concur that the result represents a conservative approach, we do not concur that it is representative of current background concentrations based on the results of the sampling program from the 11 sampled wells.

Thirteen (13) Iots are proposed within the Hamlet, with the remainder of the property being vacant for the foreseeable future. On this basis and utilizing the full 45 hectare property for nitrate dilution, the anticipated nitrate loading for the proposed 13 lots at the south downgradient boundary would be well below the 10 mg/l criteria (MOE Procedure D-s-4).

When further development is proposed clearly further terrain assessment will be required to determine the size and layout of future lots outside of the Hamlet designated area. 7)

The hydrogeological work and additional confirrnatory studies undertaken in preparation and support of the hydrogeological report(s) for the subject property did not use information or field data related to well hydrofracturing. Hydrofracturing is not proposed as part of the proposed subdivision development.

J

491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1J9

(s’ia) 634 - ssgs

Page 101 of 231

Page 6

File: ASC-095 1 1 61 T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON

October 29, 2015

We concur with Malroz and Mclntosh Perry that based on the site sensitivity and

water quality a higher Ievel of investigation was required to fully assess the proposed subdivision. We have advanced additional wells, conducted additional field work and

developed an analytic model to assess the impact of the proposed subdivision on the water quantity demonstrating a higher level of investigation clearly exceeding the minimum requirements of MOECC D-s-s.

Further, we have committed to having each additional well installed at the site evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist who is Iicensed by the Ontario Association of Professional Geoscientists or Professional Engineers of Ontario. We concur with Malroz that the additional work undertaken to date has exceeded the

minimum requirements in the MOECC D-s-s Procedure clearly demonstrating long term water supply of the proposed 13 Lot subdivision development in the north portion of the properly.

2.O Closure

ASC Environmental (ASC) was retained by Terry Grant Constmction to prepare comments in prepara!ion for residential development at the subject property located in the Hamlet of Hartington, Geographic Township of Portland, Ontario. Hydrogeological work conducted to date including advancing additional wells, conducting additional field work and developing an analytical model has demonstrated long term water supply sufficient to support 47 lots on the full 45 hectare property. Clearly the property has been sufficiently characterized to support the impact on the long term water supply from the proposed 13 Lot development in the north portion of the property.

The findings reported in this document are based on the tasks completed by ASC under the -mutu’ally agreed scope of work. Professional judgement, experience with similar investigations,- and available data collected within the scope of work form the basis for our comments. ASC has prepared this document using information understood to be factual and correct, and shall not be responsible for conditions

arising from information or facts that were inaccurate, concealed, or not fully disclosed at the time of our work.

491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON

[

K7P ‘i.ig

(szs) 634 - ssgs

Page 102 of 231 Page 7

File: ASC-096 1161

T. Grant Custom Homes

Response to Technical Comments

Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON

October 29, 2015

We thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project, and trust that this information meets your satisfaaion. If you have questions or concerns regarding this document please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, ASC

rmental Inc.

(:,-u Paul N. Johnstog/M.Sc., P. Eng. Project Managi

m

l l 1%-Y 'I'5? SCAIE - I:2.000 E) s s Q % % 0 !FUREFRDNT 2f O W 6 -l) % ?ffK- $ % ? pouo .i61 Engineering Inc. 228.60 ':?a ta) IN sgcrrou si.iv(ii-r.) or r+rg'pr.aurtrrtc ACT l: )a) n #N## ? e? ?I? 81sa* l)a h? Mx -::.-Sl',i To 0 Ih?? 'jks++" h'll-all Ms* 0 alb 8}? es llaaQ I%s 81? lm i? lal? Q? l%lssh Ihha lmaaaia (1000} ? mx m+?d S? l#% f Z ial 111 I? Ils*a . + . i Flbh l)0 Imll?b rh# A% I-J#01 + :i4i-14-osQq[. ';l; jvy'-I%?' Im SI? l)u lls IT?I l :!;Jl '<- H ttllw.wll llll&.jjl.llll ADDIT[ONAI. MF.ORM.AT[ON REQUIRED UNDER d li?? i.46 i.86 totx%X !-*M]0% M :yna*-+=sxwbbiiv.'b'wnx?-s.r k (l il- l*' j 81? am lk? Rx i? l -I.a4w I%llaallaai l%rni. ? Ryba a? Mxhln?. Ia0 bs 81? Ils I? Rss ) ..iL,, j.l OWNERaS CERTrF[CATE I. Ts-s Ihsa Ht*lm Islhwb? n@?PRO??I Ia 1%@aaa asd 8sbMll fMa Plas g glCMKlll TERRY CRANT - 1210001 0nhv% ha. DATa: wmMN& 2011 ,t/gs' 1278804 Ihlatla In!. l HAvv THE AIITHDR?TY TO alND THE conluTION a W SURVEYORaS CERT[F[CATE? I CmRTlrl riur? I. lm muWniN?g O? ffif umm 16 m mllgbl[lD8 mn rm mr.imysyip m rux aruhcgwr uNm ma t6hhRem 8rhl*N. +-:>;y-.3,J e 8Mll'll & gMfTH SURVEnRS Ilml mmMaEk 0018 WlllJ[M N. elRh-Il.Lm. l===?W==l TWO3 (Th LOT4 ,159-0 l .. SSITE [ KEY PLAN Cl -cn l la)l xh 'rwoiol a'l kOT 0 ! ? l- l LOTTh -?k+ (-1 ?l r? '-isa.r E kOT l t58.O' -l zi TW(14 0 =6i ail ,tl 1 (, 158' ] /-15aO ,157, '?oos e on tl'l' rl zi I -O IN 'n 'la) l)i +i Z 57,1 157.1 157.1 TWO8 zl 10i @ o /ia' WMSOE FAltrl'Y [MrACffmlW l SIIM FAcltlff l IYlrAt alrrl AREA LOTS .k BIOCKS d{173 I ki 13 mTWET8. BLllCl! 11 gtncit is lo ) ITHER-LXg)S OWNED BY APPLICANT AREA * DENmTY l 10.53 Aa l '-l.JJ u.u,ri. l l W roJ?' l l LAND USE .l58.Q ?/ I SITE DATA m llr.BB*w RKM *iF'tMRER 18. I!016 'N Page 106 of 231 Page 107 of 231 Enclosure 1 File: ASC-095 1181 December 3, 2015 Proposed Hartington Subdivision, Hartington, ON Test Wells - The following nitrate concentrations were identified in groundwater samples from test wells: Lot#l3 Lot#l0 Lot # 4 Lot # 9 Lot # s South of Lot #7 Test well TWO1 0.75 mg/l Test well TWO2 0.1 mg/l Test well TWO3 2.1 mg/l and 3.1 mg/l (2.6 mg/I average) Test well TWO9 2.8 mg/l Testwell TW10 4.21 mg/l Test well TWO4 0.3 mg/I Nitrate Concentration at 13 Lot Boundary The infiltrating precipitation volume was calculated using a water surplus value determined from Figure 6.3.1 in Regional Flood Frequency Analysis (Moin and Shaw, 1986) and an infiltration factor determined from Table 2: Infiltrating Factors in MOEE Hydrogeological Technical Information Requirements For Land Development Applications (MOEE, 1995). The permeable area, Ad, was determined considering roadway, sidewalk and driveway areas. Each dwelling roof will utilize eavestroughs and downspouts to discharge precipitation to the permeable ground surface. The permeable area of the site is 11 .15 hectares of the total 11 .85 hectares. We present the following calculation to assess Nitrate: Water surplus = 387.5 mm (average between 375 and 400 mm from Figure 6.3. 1 ) Infiltration factor (from Table 2): Topography (rolling land) Soil (medium combination of clay and loam) Cover (cultivated lands) 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 k = water surplus x infiltration factor k = 387.5 mm x O.5 k = 193.75 mm m Page 108 of 231 File: ASC-095 1181 Proposed Hartington Subdivision, Hartington, ON Enclosure 1 December 3, 2015 Nitrate For 13 Lot Subdivision - (11.85 hectares): 1 . k (annual dilution precipitation rate) = 0.19375 m 2. Permeable area 13 Lot Subdivision = 11 .15 Ha 3. Va (annual dilution volume) = Ad x k = 11.15 Ha x O.19375 m = 21,603,000 L 4. Vs (annual sewage volume) = 13 Lots x 1000 l/d x 365 day/yr = 4,745,000 L s. Vt (total annual volume) = Va + Vs = 26,348,000 L 6. Cs (concentration of nitrate in sewage) = 40 mg/L 7. a. Cb (background nitrate concentration) = 1 .79 mg/L 8. a. Cpb (concentration of nitrate at boun6ary) = ((Cs x Vs)/Vt ) + Cb = 9.0 mg/L Nitrate For 13 Lot Subdivision - (using full 45 hectares for dilution): 1 . k (annual dilution precipitation rate) = 0.19375 m 2. Permeable area 13 Lot Subdivision = 44.15 Ha (including impermeable area from 13 Lots) 3. Va (annual dilution volume) = Ad x k = 44.15 Ha x O.19375 m = 85,540,625 L 4. Vs (annual sewage volume) = l3Lots x 1000 l/d x 365 day/yr = 4,745,000 L s. Vt (total annual volume) = Va + Vs = 90,285,625 L 6. Cs (concentration of nitrate in sewage) = 40 mg/L 7. b. Cb (background nitrate concentration) = 1 .79 mg/L 8. b. Cpb (concentration of nitrate at boundary) = ((Cs x Vs)/Vt ) + Cb = 3.9 mg/L !?!ENVIRONMENTAL Page 109 of 231 One Resocirce, Multiple Results info@soservtces.ca JANUARY18,2016 TO!VNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC P.0. Box 100 Synsy,sxt, ONTARIO KOH 2TO RE: SOIL AND GROUND WATER ASSESSMENT LETTER - 5598 KING'S HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON The purpose of this letter is to provide comment on the iikelihood of migration of hydrocarbon coritamiiiation in groundwater from the above noted site. Specialized Onsite Services Inc. [SOS] carried out a partial soil and groundwater remediation program at a property located at 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario [the "Site"?. As part of the investigation conducted at the subject Site, a limited subsutface drilling program was performed on the properq. The subject property is a commercial property owned by the Tomship of South Frontenac. The propeior is currently a vacant lot but formerly had one. txvo storey building constructed on it with several additions attached. The building formerly operated as a convenience store and gas bar. Two gasoline pumps were formerly located to the west of the buildirig fronting Highway 38, Fuel for the pumps was provided by two underground fuel storage tanks [UFST] formerly buried to the south of the building footprint. Tlie site is bounded by a commercial property to the south, So?ith Frontenac Townsliip Fire Hall to the east. King's Highway 38 to the svest and HoJleford Road to the north. Based on-site investigations pe.rformed to date and analytical testing of soils and ground water collected during the assessment process conducted at the Site, petroleum hydrocarbon contamination ivas found within the subsurface soils and ground water at 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario. The contamination was found to extend out laterally from the former underground fuel storage tanks to the north, south, east and west. Hydrocarbon contamination was identified in the ftactured bedrock layers at 3.O metres below ground surface and extended to th.e competent bedrock layer at approximately 3.65 m depth respectively. Verification soil samples collected from the excavation extents identified elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbon [PHC] along with benzene, toluene, ethybenzene and xylenes [BTEX] contamination that exceeded the applicable Table 6 Site Condition Standard provided in the MOE document "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmenta[ Protectton Act". From the seven ground water samples collected trom the monitoring well network on the subject property, two (2) had elevated PHC and BTEX detections that exceeded the a?pplicable Table 6 SCS. Petroleum l'iydrocarbon contamination remains in subsurface soi}s and fractured bedrock layers around the north, east and west extents of the former excavated area. In addition, hydrocarbon impacts were identified in the subsurface soil/rock on the north elevatioty of the property adjacent Holleford Road. SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES lsc. 357 BEECHWOOD ROAD, NAPANEE, ON, K7R 3LI TEL: 61 3-354-3553 EMAIL: .?.?.ibir:o@?s.???????v?c=sct:x WWW.SOSERVICES.CA Page 110 of 231 JANUARY 10, 20le SOS FILE #1501-140 3('>IL AND GROUNDWATER ASJ;ESSMENT IETTER 5598 HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON. ON Ground water samples collected from the rrionitoring vveJl neAsvork on-site identified PHC and BTEX contamination at otie (l) Iocation which ex.ceededt the appnicable MOE Tabie 6 Site Conditiort Standards. Based on verification water samples collected. it is recorrmended that additiotiaJ samples be collected from the monitoring welu network in order to monitor the contamination identified within shallow groundwater table. Based on monitoring welN observations, local groundwater flow appears to be towiards the east. The relatnve elevations of the groundwater table found in the site rtxonitoring wells show that at the time of monitoring, the horizontaN groundwater gradient was re!atively flat, indicating that groundivater flow velocity at the site is relative(y low. Based on the ioxi groundwater flow velociff, it is expected that the risk of migration of gyoundwatev contamination to sites in excess of 500 m away from the subject site, is also re[ativeiy low. SOS recommends that additional monitoring weils be drilled to establish ciean perimeter wells arou?nd the entire site. The perimeter wells should be monitored twice per ye,;m to monitor whetber or nof off-site contairiinant migration is occurring, untiJ the site is fully remediated. Respectfully submitted by, Spsc?zr=v O.zir'irr= SER v'rcbs, // ? (, / ,/ .r;d..(???e= Catrt Monk De.rck Maat, MASc., P. Eng., QP President Envirotxmental Engineer SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVjCES jNC. Page 111 of 231 r r %pecialized Onsite Services Inc. One Resource, Multipte Results 1 i Q info@soservices.ca JA?,=?gy 28, 2016 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC p.o. Box 100 SYDENHAM, ONTARIO KOH 2TO RE: SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION - 5598 KING'S HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON The purpose of this letter is to provide an update to our January 18, 2016 letter regarding the risk of migration of hydrocarbon contamination in groundwater from the above noted site. Subsequent to the release of our January 18, 20 16 letter, the Township provided us with a sampling report prepared by Cambium Inc. (Cambium) dated January 4, 2016, that reports groundwater monitoring well sampling results for site sampling that took place on November 25, 2015. The information provided by Cambium showed a slight increase in hydrocarbon contamination in the groundwater since the SOS sampling that occurred in July 2015. According to the Cambium November 2015 sampling data, four (4) of the seven (7) monitoring wells on the site contained petroleum hydrocarbon contamination that exceeds the applicable Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) standards. In addition to sampling monitoring wells at the subject site, Cambium also sampled groundwater from the supply wells on properties surrounding the subject site on November 25, 2015. The Cambium data showed that none of the groundwater samples from the supply wells on properties surrounding subject property contained any detections of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. The groundwater elevation data collected by Cambium during the November 25, 2015 sampling event was generally consistent with the groundwater elevation data obtained by SOS in July 2015 and confirmed that local groundwater flow direction was generally towards the east. It is noted that the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has likely been preserit on the subject site for in excess of 30 years, yet no hydrocarbon impact has been observed in supply wells at adjacent properties. In addition, the remediation work that was carried out at the site in 2015, which involved the excavation and removal of in excess of 250 tormes of contaminated soil and rock, has significantly reduced the potential for migration of hydrocarbon contamination, compared to the condition of the site prior to 2015. It is our opinion that based on the fact that local groundwater flow appears to be towards the east and that no hydrocarbon impact has been observed in water supply wells on properties located adjacent to the subject site, the potential is very low that hydrocarbon impact from the site will migrate to proposed supply wells located several hundred meters to the west of the site. SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES INC. 357 BEECHWOOD ROAD, NAPANEE, ON, K7R 3LI TEL: 613-354-3553 EMAIL: iiypo(oi,sosesvicgs.ch WWVll.SOSERVlCES.CA Page 112 of 231 JANUARY 18, 2016 SOIL AND GROUNDWA TER CONTAMINA TION SOS FILE #1501-140 5598 HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON Respectfully submitted by, S PECL4LIZED Orqs'rw S r=vvrcps, ,7 /') .-? / 1) Cam Monk President Derek Maat, MASc., P. Eng., QP Environmental Engineer SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES INC. Please see Malroz Engineering's response to the SOS correspondence. Page 113 of 231 Joe Joe Gallivan MCIP RPP Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie ON KOH IS0 phone 613.548.9400 extension 350 fax 613.548.8460 email jgallivan@frontenaccounty,ca From: John Pyke [mailto:Pyke@malroz.com? Subject: Hartington Gas Bar Comments Hi joe, We understand that comments have been provided regarding the proposed Grant subdivision in Hartington and the potential impact of the former gas bar at the corner of Highway 38 and Holleford Road. We have reviewed the following documents: 1. Soil and Ground Water Assessment Report - 5'A8 King's Highway 38, Hartington, ON, prepared by Specialized Onsite Services Inc., dated September 28, 2015. On- and Off-Site Groundwater Sampling, 5598 County Road 38, Hartington, Onbario, Cambium Reference No. 4560-001, prepared by Cambium Inc., dated January 4, 2016. Soil and Ground Water Contamination - 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, ON., prepared by Specialized 2. 3. Onsite Services Inc., dated January 28, 2016. The above information is in addition to the reports on file from the subdivision proponents consultant. Report number 1 speaks to the site assessment work conducted at the referenced site. The report identified petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in both the soil and shallow groundwater. A water sample collected from the onsite potable water supply well met the standards. Monitoring wells installed as a part of the assessment vvere surveyed for relative elevation and groundwater Ievels measured at each of the 7 monitoring wells. The relative elevation of the water levels in the monitoring wells indicated that groundwafer flow was northeast, east and southeast across the site. Report number 2 speaks to groundwater sampling at the 7 monitoring wells at the site, one onsite potable water supply well and 6 offsite potable water supply wells. The sampling indicated that the shallow groundwater petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not delineated. The results further indicated that the deeper potable water supply wells met the standards. Report number 3 speaks to the consultants opinion that contamination of proposed supply wells Iocated several hundred meters west of the site are unlikely to be impacted from the subject site contamination. Malroz Comments Groundwater level monitoring at the proposed subdivision indicates that groundwater flow in the potable water supply aquifer is predominately southerly with some east, north and westerly components in the north part of the site. Groundwater Ievel monitoring in the shallower wells at the gas bar site conducted by 505 indicate that shallow groundwater flow is easterly (away from the proposed subdivision). Groundwater analyses conducted by 505 and Cambium identify petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the shallow g,roundwater with the deeper water supply wells as being below laboratory detection Iimits for petroleum hydrocarbons. It appears that the petroleum hydrocarbon plume at the site has not been fully delineated and should be managed in accordance with TSSA and MOECC regulations. Considering the information from ASC Environmental, 505 and Cambium we are of the opinion that the risk to the proposed subdivision from the former gas bar at highway 38 and Holleford Road to be Iow. This cursory review has been conducted to assess the potential risk of petroleum hydrocarbon migration from the former gas bar at highway 38 and Holleford Road in Hartington, Ontario may migrate to the proposed Grant Subdivision on Boyce Road and contaminate the potable bedrock water supply aquifer. Our assessment of the risk is based on reports prepared by others and Malroz has not conducted field assessments to verify the information contained in those reports. Should a more detailed assessment be undertaken or further information become available we would recommend that the above opinion be revisited. This opinion has been prepared for the sole use of the County of rrontenac. Please Iet us know if you have any further questions. Best Regards, John R. Pyke, P.Geo. Environmental Geoscientist Malroz Engineering Inc. tel (613) 548-3446 ex.34 fax (613) 548-7975 pyke@malroz.com Page 114 of 231 PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Planning Department Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 15, 2016 Subject: Closing of Road Allowance in, Part of Lot 26, Between Concessions V and VI, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Corrigan ________________________________________________________________ Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council deny a request from a property-owner to close and transfer ownership of a portion of unopened road allowance at Bobs Lake in the District of Bedford. Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide the background information necessary to enable Council to decide on the closing of an untravelled and unopened Township road allowance. Background & Discussion: The Planning Department received a letter from a lawyer representing the owner of the above-noted property requesting to know whether Council would agree to the closure and sale of a portion of unopened road allowance that runs through the west portion of his client’s property and leads to the shore of Bobs Lake. The letter dated September 29, 2015, describes that the property is currently in the Registry system and was not converted to Land Titles because it includes the land on the road allowance which was never stopped up and conveyed to his client. Thus, the letter is requesting that the land be stopped up and deeded to his client. Attachment #1 is a copy of the letter and Attachment #2 is a map showing the location of the subject land. Attachment #3 is a copy of a survey showing the road allowance through the property with the portion to be deeded identified as PART 1 (highlighted in yellow). The road allowance is a northern extension of Burns Road that leads directly to the waterfront of Bobs Lake. As seen on the survey, the portion to be deeded is a triangular portion of land that effectively severs the main portion of the road allowance in the south from the waterfront portion at the north. It is approximately 140 metres (460 ft.) long and is 0.48 acres in size. The land is treed and slopes steeply towards the shoreline. Discussion: It should be emphasized that it has been Council’s policy to not close road allowances that lead to any waterfront. It has been Council’s preference to maintain these portions of road allowance for the public’s access to the water. This matter came before the Committee of the Whole on November 10, 2015 where the Committee decided that Council members should visit the site to determine whether the lay of the land would make it possible for future public Page 115 of 231 access to the water. The Planning Department was advised by both Bedford representatives that the area is in fact suitable for public access. Conclusion: Because the road allowance appears capable of accommodating future public access to the shore of the lake the request to close and sell the land should be denied. Recommendation It is recommended that Council deny the request to close and transfer ownership of the unopened road allowance in Part of Lot 26, between Concessions V and VI in the District of Bedford. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments RoadClosureReportCorrigan Prepared by: Lindsay Mills, Page 116 of 231 ATTACHMENT #1 BRYNA D. MCLEOD LAWYER VIA r:,=xx 613-376-6657 September 29, 20?5 Township of South Frontenac }).0. Box 1.00 4432 Georgc Street Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0 Attn: Wayne Orr - Chief Administrative Officer Dear Mr Orr: Re: CORRIGAN, Katlileen PIN 36239-0098, Pts l arid 2, 13R-20872 Roll No.: 23 08 030 023 00343 My File No.: 11 I81 I am the solicitor for Kathleen Corrigan, the registered owner of the above-noted property. T?ie property is currently in the Registry system, and is a non-convert to I,and Titles because it includes lands on the road allowance between Concessioiis s and 6, former Township of' Bedford, which road allowance was riot stopped off by by-)aw or conveyed to my client or her predecessors in title. The part of the property on the road allowance is Part 1, 13R-20872. l have enclosed detaii otthe reference plan showing the lands in question. l-he purpose of this letter is to enquire whether the arownship of South Froiitenac would be prepared to deed Part 1, 1 3R-20872 to my client. My client, and before her her predecessor-ixi-title (her aunt Ann German), have been iii occupation of the property since April, 1964. l nave enclosed a copy of the transfer rron?i my client's gra.rzdmother to my client's aunt, registered Apri} 17, 1964, which ixicludes a sketch of the lands. Thank-you for your consideration of this matter. Please let me know what further information you might require. Bryria D. McLeod F'roless!onal CorporaVon s Norwich Street West Guelph, Ontario NIH 2G8 Tel 519.767.2141 Fax S19.767.2145 brynamcleod.com tm' Yours very tru?y, f,,/V',,AJ Bryna McLeod BM:mhs oroiroolJ 9C)TJJO Mt"I PO9TC))J etlKlE[ ciT]l2. L9L 6Tg XVa lTr:';l I'Hd CiTO2./2:0/OT Page 117 of 231 7"? TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC p(A' W??',4. ATTACHMENT #2 n '? N y Bobs Lake W- E l s r / v / ,," /-; l % l} / (V! y } ') V 7 ) I !9 S Bobs Lake !W !1 l l S ' l 1 ! ! 'N & 4> l Th l r t I l l r l ?'a /'-, ,') wE1E f> ! r, M'o d . Burridge Lake fc, 0%l Xe l =34! a ???-,,"?%l .4 'S L 66-,%, i b '? < f l- l /0 l ! ? h( Page 118 of 231 ATTACHMENT #3 PLAN of of SURVEY of Pa,rt of LOT 26, CONCESSION 6 Part of the ROAD ALL(flANCE betweer CONCESSIONS s AND 6 (;eogmpMc Towns7at%p of Bedford TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNTY of COUNTY 50metres o 50 l J l SCALE = 1:1500 18 l 18 l 100 I i 150metres J l j l HOPKINS, CORMIER & CH)Tff SURTnEY(NC CONSULTmTS INC. -2012- l Q S I-i Bob's Lake (:l 0 ?l p*nr 0 %,j (Controlled - :See Note) o k a to + (.4 7, 0' Ul ? Th PLAN 13R-3323 (! [ € l C?l 0 '< C') OTO/EOO9 ail=i SSIB (i352) * N ';i'O sb 4: a? s ffl -,J b rz ./?SSl8 [71 01 l (JJ liN - p!4?? :,,' ,,; '4? N G))TJJO Mt"I PO9'IOW et)K1E[ ciT]TZ L9L 6T(; XV,H Zf:gT I'Ha CiTOZ/ZO/OT Page 119 of 231 A I * 2 1 '%: r J J @WJ 1 } al j<'i' L J P rj # 1 '1 r l !0L !" i. 1Qj 9 Wl Th.%,i.'? r V l fi 1 r,/ r 'IR')'€(99514 / / l Q 362389507S l !/ '! ( S '% l Th 1 XS k '( W l t l rk '%l S 4? * / M F ,T 4 F'l K '!! 113 mi W 1 1 i j % Gall P r L ilx r a r L.- 362399515i l/ & Page 120 of 231 PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Planning Department County File: 10T-2013/001 Report Date: February 25, 2016 Applicant: 1059823 Ont. Ltd. Matias Subject: Approval of Subdivision Agreement in Part of Lots 18 & 19, Concession II, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Willowbrook Estates ________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council pass By-law Number 2016-14 authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a subdivision agreement with 1059823 Ontario Ltd. (Tony Matias) for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates residential subdivision. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a subdivision agreement and a by-law to enter into the agreement to allow development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision. BACKGROUND On November 17, 2015 Council approved draft plan conditions for Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Plan of Subdivision. Subsequently, on January 20, 2016, Frontenac County also gave their approval to the draft plan conditions. As Council will recall, the full development of the subdivision is proposed to be in two phases. Phase 1 would comprise seven lots and Phase 2 would have nine lots. Attachment #1 shows the subject parcel and Attachment #2 shows the full development with both phases identified. Attachment#3 is a surveyor’s depiction of the Phase 1 layout. Council should note that Phase 1 of the subdivision is proposed to be developed at this time and the attached agreement is specific to this phase only. When Phase 2 comes forward for development another subdivision agreement must be entered into for that phase. CONCLUSION The attached subdivision agreement has been prepared in accordance with the draft conditions approved by Township Council and County Council. They have been prepared by the Township’s solicitor and have been reviewed by Township staff and the developer and his solicitor. The CAO advises Council that the Township does not have the processes or staffing capacity in place to effectively manage the agreement as written and while the CAO is not in a position to state what is definitely needed at this time, nothing is to be gained by delaying approval. During the implementation of the agreement staff will provide best efforts to work with the developer through the process. It is staff’s opinion that the provisions of the agreement fully implement the conditions of draft approval and they are therefore supported. PROCESS Following approval of the subdivision agreement, Planning will advise the County that all conditions for draft approval have been met. Following this, the County Page 121 of 231 would give final approval to the subdivision application. The subdivision agreement itself must be registered on the title of the land after which time the new lots are created and construction of the homes can proceed. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that By-law Number 201614 to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a subdivision agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 Ontario Ltd. for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision, be passed. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments MatiasSubdivionAreemmentBylawReport Prepared by: Lindsay Mills Page 122 of 231 Wl!LoWBRoOK EsTAmS .-'-A ATTACHMENT #2 li '?A' ! 'sl'fj'%?-')'Sl&?I"a??:'/"(?"'j A!I-" '$129Page of 95123 of 231 I il iA 'i/ Jl 10 /! all i!'j ,a NQ ).1, h(,) '.1 11 lllffialw' '); J s '+? (.Y" i m l ,%l l 'l 'S i-'HA 'r 'ffi- W - - Nl 11 "l .-,-' i 1 g' BLOCk 8 'ii 1, 11, l K?l&m l (Tt(l JI?N( e.? aY . t(YX.OaleAl %i '%'l ffii',,i /, S L d l ,?-J.€>"P '! ,,3 ,%',"? l ( 6J 11' -n us -, .Qs:Ja%a%ffg a/, ?l l 2 a 2' s o '4ttl {'-IS as v,, i5* 'i LSI ulAT 7' 8 I I / Ij r,? ! .1 LOT KTLANI} mARY assasutm mposy i '%I BY ECOIJ'aAl SERWaES lDA'fi JUNt & 2(Xa ,! J 'r 11)R 1> o l,, ?4 i"S / (1.5?)! Il.3€% ( l :',:<,- aJ, X %' (1/r o F 'a? ! .y'cil tOT 9 !b i 30m 'it'ThlAe)l IjltXAH5 alXlh :%.I2)l ( NtW LUJIT g atVATlm- I0ff.(x+ I 'i" O LOT 7, k '4 b r Cl {l l(l 1 a 1=, to l art 8 g A i fl ,- e .tu a. '----l t 0 J:? ( 11 I -??€ l 5A.S&% 'l] ti WETIAND R(XMIARN DEljN€Aa 'A'l m lvtml Mr LOT 3 l l (!OM?Ai 6'PA S 's S ll 'I '1 V 'i l lCXlSTNa ,4AIN FIJX 'm BE fluKD 61).(10 'aukMlM 16 11 ..;' l' s ei, V 1 9 % 1 l # ?x ks,- ,, j,,11 1 'l ,5m' LOT A 'l' '1 3 I, 1' la l/ / 11 g -'b'.- j lffl(kl i %., ! s! l' l to d U.a' 1 s/ -, I s'lX ,Slo, ,o>D PS {i i /J S U-ay / ") l Inc. liii--l / i i Page 124 of 231 Page 30 of 95 ATTACHMENT #3 1!!;Ometres l 1, IB (taae;ll)' .,,.LNoTt7hgrl1%MAvtgk of > o CONCESS IO N & ?% k Kl, PART 7, PLAN L (N84'22'!E 18 (1888) IQ Ig C=32.44- A-87.31 R=20.O0 m o), # 7 9 '> / Z.IB ,(7pl€a ??%l*Jh' (Jl > I 73R- PIN 38292-0000 "/ % k %J (bB els 1l Mt,@q as 'S:I +G 7 eo%J ssa (taaa) (WIT) m h'< 0 <. 'e 's S o b4 Ag xI 0,? ,,=?$'!,!,,7'; '.-=='* .-'. % ?:?, gi.b Q,is x/4a '1= S Q;it*4u QJ / hi50 $ 0 '!'- 0 /- W va?l V s O # (3 ?) SSIB (1888) / Iu18(1886) %U ,,,0 /f4 ,; ),/ S FosbnASsrueyMmuvrmd StanAard Irms Bw ac? e*mamimsa rwwn nny wi,S ',, ?e9@g Page 125 of 231 PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Planning Department Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 County File: 10T-2013/001 Report Date: February 26, 2016 Applicant: 1324789 Ont. Ltd. Subject: Approval of Condominium Agreement in Part of Lots 20 & 21, Concession IV, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Applewood Estates ________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council pass By-law Number 2016-15 authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a condominium agreement with 1324789 Ontario Ltd. (Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation) for development of the Applewood Estates Residential Plan of Condominium. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a condominium agreement and a by-law to enter into the agreement to allow development of the Applewood Estates Condominium. BACKGROUND On November 4, 2014 Council approved draft plan conditions for the Applewood Estates Plan of Condominium. Subsequently, Frontenac County also gave their approval to the draft plan conditions. Attachment #1 shows the subject parcel and Attachment #2 shows the full layout of the units in the Plan. As Council is aware, the development has been proposed for a number of years and was originally to be developed as a recreational resort for approximately 45 rental cabins owing to the RRC-2 zoning that previously applied to the property. However, the owner instead brought forward the plan of condominium which proposes 22 vacant land condominium residential units to be developed similar to a plan of subdivision. For Council’s information, the subject land is already developed to some degree with the common access roads (lanes) constructed, underground Bell and Hydro services installed, a common docking facility and common waterfront park and a pedestrian access bridge with parking area already in place. It should be emphasized that, because this is a private condominium development, the Township will not be assuming or maintaining the roads in the Plan and will have no obligation to undertake any works to improve the lanes. This is the sole responsibility of the owner. CONCLUSION The attached condominium agreement has been prepared in accordance with the draft conditions approved by Township Council and County Council. They have been prepared by the Township’s solicitor and have been reviewed by Township staff and the developer and his solicitor. The CAO advises Council that the Township does not have the processes or staffing capacity in place to effectively manage the agreement as written and while the CAO is not in a position to state what is definitely needed at this time, nothing is to be gained by Page 126 of 231 delaying approval. During the implementation of the agreement staff will provide best efforts to work with the developer through the process. It is staff’s opinion that the provisions of the agreement fully implement the conditions of draft approval and they are therefore supported. PROCESS Following approval of the condominium agreement, Planning will advise the County that all conditions for draft approval have been met. Following this, the County would give final approval to the condominium application. The condominium agreement itself must be registered on the title of the land after which time the new units are created and construction of the homes can proceed. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that By-law Number 201615, to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a condominium agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1324789 Ontario Ltd. and Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation for development of the Applewood Estates Condominium, be passed. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills Prepared by: Lindsay Mills attachments ApplewoodCondominiumAreemmentBylawReport Page 127 N of 231 Attachment # 1 W' s ri [ 11 Lacey Lake L Hi I /I] m ': 4 m ';0 T'F 'l s 2 {0 ,,-!! O ,lJTLEDi aB k Loughborough Lake O IR 7 ')' 411 Subject 3and Lo4hborough :)i oughborough Lal s?wEETFERS d m. -j4Hfa- lnverary Lake. 0:l :)i Il sr Ojl I o * "'a 8 .12 ? ? r / / ( / .7, l n l / 6 ,,? 0l00?lll 'i ff 31 1 / 7 7 f 1 ?????' M ?????? 2 ::::::::::Ti :::::::?:& -....... -- i 111????? r s s 1 1 I 11 11 r 3 l z % '% '% r Ii ---l ffi :::::J :: -'l - 1- i 'I TTe:111 ? 4 c ? 'l 1 l l i i I I l j rso 225 300 I I l Meters 1 0 37.5 -is l l l Page 129 of 231 STAFF REPORT HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council: February 10, 2016 Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 SUBJECT: Non Union staff compensation and performance evaluation RECOMMENDATION: That Council support the redesign of the performance evaluation tool to improve its benefit and ease of use, while maintaining its current linkage to compensation That the current salary grid remain as developed BACKGROUND: Through a notice of Motion, Council referred the issue of non-union staff compensation and performance to the Corporate Services Committee. Staff briefed the committee on the current process and tool and investigated several alternate compensation options. Highlights of the report included: • A review and summary of an effective performance management system • Internet research of performance management and compensation options • A review of the current Township of South Frontenac performance evaluation and salary grid system • A review of the newly adopted County of Frontenac compensation system • A review of pay for performance programs, advantages, disadvantages and the required components if this option is chosen • A review of other compensation systems • A review of other performance management systems (Loyalist Township and County of Frontenac) • Observations from staff The Corporate Services Committee reviewed the report and considered previous recruiting and retention history at the Township. After addressing questions and discussion the Corporate Services Committee supported the following recommendations: 1. That staff redesign the performance evaluation form to make it easier to complete and more informative for both the employee and supervisor. 2. That the current salary grid be maintained. Submitted/approved by: Prepared by: Wayne Orr CAO Sherry Corneil HR/Legislative Compliance Officer Page 130 of 231 SF Rides - Meeting Minutes - Nov 2, 2015 Attendees: Scott, Rich, Robert, Alastair, Fran, Kelly, Stephanie, Ross, Peter. Regrets: Sue Clinton, Bob Clinton, Lesley Olvet-Kirby Scott called the meeting to order at 1900 hrs. Peter presented the report on possible 2016 CycleFest locations in Verona. Options reviewed were Prince Charles School, Methodist Church grounds, United Church area, Verona Lions grounds. After some discussion the committee agreed on Prince Charles School as its first choice. Discussion ensued on the date, which was decided to be Sunday, June 12, 2016. Action Item: Scott to approach the school and book it for June 12, 2016, 0900 till 1500. Ross suggested forming sub-committees to deal with (1) maps, (2) fundraising and (3) logistics. These groups to report back to the committee at the January meeting. The committee members supported this idea, with the suggestion to postpone the formation of the fundraising sub-committee until the January meeting. The group members are: (1) Maps: Peter, Kelly, Robert, Stephanie, Debbie and Lesley( both in absentia) (2) Fundraising: TBD (3) Logistics, Rodeo, Guided Rides: Scott, Ross, John, Fran, Alistair, Sue and Bob Clinton (in absentia). Action Item: Maps and Logistics to prepare report for January meeting (Jan 11). It was proposed, seconded and carried that the committee purchase: Page 131 of 231 1. one 10’ x 10’ canopy tent. Stephanie recommended Costco ($289). Colour TBD pending the colour choice of the logo. Either blue or white. 2. one banner which would be sized to fit the tent. Action Item: Stephanie: to arrange design for the banner Action Item: Ross: to purchase the tent and banner. Colour TDB (choice is blue or white) Stephanie presented 18 possible designs for the logo. After two rounds of voting design number 12 was selected. Action Item: Stephanie: to offer colour choices and email them to the committee for approval. Stephanie reviewed the Infrastructure tour attended by Justin Jones from Share the Roads. Here is a link to their website: Share the Roads There will be a day-long workshop in Kingston on March 30 to create a work plan for the township (and Napanee) with an aim to achieve Bronze status for the township by the Autumn of 2016. Following the workshop there is a Community Cafe in the Sydenham Library Community Room to review the day's work and get more local citizenry involved and informed. Any member of the SF Rides committee is invited to attend. The next committee meeting is Monday, January 11, 19:00 hrs. Action Item: Ross to book a room and notify committee members. Scott adjourned the meeting at 20:47 hrs. Page 132 of 231 Minutes by secretary for the day: Peter Bedoukian Page 133 of 231 SOUTH FRONTENAC RIDES MINUTES January 11, 2016, Sydenham Public Library, Community Room, Village of Sydenham Members in attendance Robert Charest, Bob Clinton, Sue Clinton, Scott Gordon, Alastair Lamb, Rich Ludlow, Kelly Pilgrim, Ross Sutherland and Fran Willes. Regrets Stephanie Sciberra and Leslie Kirby-Olvert. Acting Chairman Alastair Lamb called the meeting to Order at 7 p.m. Secretary for the meeting Fran Willes agreed to act as Secretary for the meeting. MOTIONS Agenda Moved by Rich Ludlow, Seconded by Sue Clinton that the Agenda be confirmed as circulated. Carried. Current Financial Situation Moved by Robert Charest, Seconded by Bob Clinton, that discussion with regard to the organization’s finances be postponed until the next meeting where a full and complete financial report would be tabled for discussion. Carried. Discussion of items that did not require a motion Banner and Bling There was a display of the new South Frontenac Rides banner and bling. These items will primarily be used for the 2016 Cyclefest to be held in the Village of Verona on Sunday, June 12th. The members expressed their appreciation for the excellent work. Members discussed the issue of - publication deadlines for the submission of materials (such as posters) with regard to the June 2016 Cyclefest. 1 Page 134 of 231 - A new cycle route map to be submitted containing the 2016 Cyclefest routes incorporated with the cycle routes laid-out during last year’s Cyclefest. (Stephanie et al.) Note: Rich Ludlow to follow up with Anne Marie. Eastern Ontario Cycling. th - March 30 workshop and afterwards in the evening at Council Chambers. [Justin will be present]. Notes: Alastair to check with Stephanie re invitees. Bob (member of the Economic Development Committee) requested to send list of invitees to Stephanie. Ross to compose draft letter for invitees to submitted at next meeting for approval. be Ross to check with Rose Pennock – BBQ. Also Frontenac Cyclists, Cataraqui Trail, K&P, Trans Canada Trial, etc. - Scott requested members submit suggestions of public events whereby South Frontenac Rides might be present to promote public awareness of the existence of our organization. Note: Scott to invite Fire Department, OPP, Yellow Bikes, etc. The Agenda being completed, Chairman Lamb, declared the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. The next meeting to be held at either the Sydenham Public Library or the Council Chambers on Wednesday, January 11th, 2016 at 7 p.m. 2 Page 135 of 231 VCA/ 11 Nov 2015 Directors Present: Chet Babcock, Linda Bates, Joyce Casement, Don Coleman, Wayne Conway, Tabitha Morton, Rhonda Storring Regrets: Debbie Lingen Guest: John MacDougall 7 PM Wayne called the meeting to order Minutes from Oct Meeting: Approved with one amendment Further discussion from the minutes: Wayne spoke with Ann Marie and she agrees that next summer would be a more appropriate time for the village visits. What would be our plans for Andy Mills, do we wish to hire him? Yes, we would like to hire him and ideas such as park benches, garbage containers, electric sign, and lighting are projects that we could start to prepare for possible funding requests. Our homework is to list some of the ideas that we wish to tackle. We can invite Andy to come to a meeting and ask his opinion. The Cenotaph was discussed at the last meeting and Linda asked John MacDougall who owned the property. It is owned by the SF Township but just a small area. Linda would like it clearly marked to avoid future misunderstandings if benches were placed around the cenotaph and encroached on property not owned by the township. The cellphone, Rogers has $100.00 per year contract. Don has a spare cellphone which could be used for this purpose. We don’t need a phone, we need the line which could be advertised as the VCA number. We could purchase our own number for $25.00 with a sim card and set up the voicemail. It’s pay as you go. Motion made by Linda to set up the phone with a sim card and voicemail so it can be used by the VCA. Seconded by Chet. Motion passed. Community angels: No further developments at this point. Bridge Flags: John MacDougall has them. Guest speaker: John MacDougall began by expressing his appreciation for VCA and the things we have accomplished in Verona. John has several topics he would like the VCA to consider: Habitat for Humanity: There is a derelict house on Sand Road, the township owns the land and Habitat for Humanity would like to build a house for a local family. It would involve a commitment from the community in the way of volunteer hours. They like a community group to pick it up…not sure what it means, we would need to contact someone for further details. Someone suggested Googling it and find out what a champion group would do. Page 136 of 231 2. Roads and culverts: The township has set a priority on repairing roads and culverts of the hamlets, they have already identified the most urgent cases. A new road covering has been discovered which is cheaper and will last longer. They are trying to distribute the work evenly but the needs of some villages are more urgent. Harrowsmith is the next push as the major intersection in the village needs to be redesigned. 3. Hartington is having problems with gas leaking towards the new proposed subdivision. They asked for 51 new homes but only 13 homes have been approved due to problems with water and strong local opposition. 4. Senior housing remains an ongoing frustration, they have some funding for a 5 unit housing and some developers are interested as long as it can be lucrative. They are looking for a property with easy access to the doctors and the grocery store. Wayne did remind John that we still don’t have the sidewalks we asked for at the Village Meeting so seniors would have difficulty walking along Hwy 38. 5. The county has purchased the property at the corner at Belrock Rd and Hwy 38. The present occupants have 2 years to vacate but there are 2 gas tanks which must be removed before it can be developed. 6. South and North Frontenac has no access to many committees that address medical, health, seniors, children and youth issues out of Kingston. We have very little representation in most of these committees which are based in Kingston but affect people living in the region. Linda mentioned the Paramedic booklets that have been dropped after a 6 month trial. John suggested contacting Paul Charboneau, Paramedic chief and copy to Warden Doyle and Colin Pender to give them feedback about the paramedic program. Wayne asked about the Verona sidewalks, after our initiative to organize the meeting last year we have a courtesy crosswalk and an electronic speed sign. John replied that the sidewalks will be done whenever major work is done on Hwy 38. Harrowsmith had a lot of work done this summer and Belrock is presently undergoing a major facelift, new road surface, sidewalk to the hall and water drainage issues are being corrected. However our sidewalk still doesn’t extend from the village to the doctor’s office and Foodland. In closing John mentioned we need someone to run in the next municipal election coming up in 3 years. Linda asked about a celebration for Canada’s 150th and where it would be held. John replied that the county has no interest in it. Financial Report: Don received a budget update from Christmas for Kids campaign. They have 56 kids this year but that may increase. Don moved for the adoption of the financial report, seconded by Joyce. Carried. Page 137 of 231 Village Ambassador: New home care business Amanda Kendall & Jenna Bertrim We do storefront businesses, it needs to be a visible store front We could ask Debbie Lingen about making some welcome cards for the VCA with our logo which could be given to new business that is operated from a home location. Free Skate: Everything is in place and Chet will be there to help. Christmas in the Village: We have another entertainer, Glenda Nichol as well as Jessica Weddon and Donnie Cochrane. Joyce has the kitchen organized; Jane Adamson will help with the Kids craft table. Shane and Travis have been asked to run the auction and the amount will be capped at $25.00. Christmas lights around the pavilion? Wayne would like them inside the pavilion to light up with the trees. Joyce would like the trees grouped together in a corner with the train passing through the pavilion. New business: Trinity is proposing that we join forces for the Winter Breakfast Program taking place at Trinity United Church on each Sat in Jan. We would need 16 people (4 people per breakfast from the VCA) and will split the profits with Trinity. The dates are Jan 9, 16, 23 and 30. Hopefully we can rotate people so they will do just one Sat. Linda made a motion that the VCA goes into a partnership with Trinity church for the Winter Breakfast Program with the proceeds going towards the Cenotaph bench. Menus will be discussed at the next meeting. Linda is on the hunt for precooked bacon. The Kiosk roof is damaged and needs repair or it may blow off and hit a vehicle. Don will call Norm Brochet, a roofer from Belrock and get it repaired asap. Cedar shakes are expensive but there may not be another option…we have agreed to spend up to $2000.00 on the repair. A motion was made by Don to investigate getting a contractor to repair the roof on the Kiosk for up to $2000.00, seconded Joyce. SALT, (senior and law enforcement together) is trying to get leaders together throughout the communities to advise seniors about different safety programs. They meet at the Grace Centre with Roop Sandu from the OPP. It is concerned with protecting seniors in the community through educating them about crime and safety issues. We need to call a public meeting to decide the future for the Festivals and which way to go. We will set up a meeting for early Jan and we discuss it. Meeting adjourned at by Linda at 8:50 Page 138 of 231 VCA/ 13 Jan 2016 Meeting called to order at 7:05 pm. Directors in Attendance: Chet Babcock, Linda Bates, Joyce Casement, Don Coleman, Wayne Conway, Rhonda Storring Regrets from Debbie Lingen and Tabitha Morton Minutes from Nov Meeting: Approved as presented Follow-up from Nov Minutes: Don has a phone number for the VCA which can be set-up by Wayne and Don. Once it is operational we will publicize it as our contact number. Trinity Winter Breakfast: A schedule has been created and has been filled by volunteers. The first breakfast was a success and made over $500.00. Meat was donated by Findlay Foods and a letter of appreciation has been sent by Rhonda and Don will send a tax receipt. Habitat for Humanity would like to talk to the VCA but first they will be making a presentation to the council. The house in Verona which they were considering has been sold. Electronic Sign: Wayne C talked to Wayne Orr about possible locations for the sign and broached the subject of the VCA entering into partnership with the Township. We propose to share power and WiFi as well as moving the location of the sign to the Belrock Road site which may not be available for 2 years. Financial Report: Don moved for the adoption of the report, 2nd by Linda. The Christmas dinner made a profit of $275.35. This will be shared with the Lion’s club since this was a joint venture. Once expenses are paid a sum of $137.67 will be forwarded to the Verona Lion’s Club as their share of the profit. Committee Reports Village Ambassador: Nothing to report. Free Skate: Linda will email the report to directors. Christmas in the Village Report: This year Linda arranged for continuous entertainment and there were 14 new crafts as well as train and horse wagon rides. Santa was enjoyed by all and has already agreed to return next year. Many consider this the best Christmas in the Village to date. Some suggestions for next year: It is a really good day but families need to go home by 6 PM. There is a suggestion that it run from 1 to 6. Replace the live auction with silent auction. Do not serve hot chocolate again. Christmas Dinner Report: This was a very successful day with a total of 85 people and volunteers in attendance. Page 139 of 231 It was a great day, with lots of good comments. Wayne had calls about a take-out service and had to clarify that the event was meant for the local area families. New Business: Verona Cattail Festival: Meeting next week for the festival. We will get the feel from the community and have a follow-up meeting in Feb. See if we have potential interest from the community and who is interested in being involved. Wayne and Judy are making personal plans for this summer and will not be heavily involved with activities in the community. Criminal record and volunteers: Questions about what our role should be if we find out that one of our volunteers has a possible criminal record. Grant for benches: Wayne is applying for a community grant of $1885.00 on behalf of the VCA and Lion’s Club. This grant is just for benches. A separate application will be made in the future for the Cenotaph work. The Township will install the benches. Moved by Joyce Casement, the VCA (Wayne) will apply for a community grant from the Township of South Frontenac for a street or park bench approximately $1900.00 Seconded by Chet Babcock. All in favour. Carried. Meeting adjourned: 7:58 Next meeting: Feb 9 Page 140 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE November 26, 2015 Present Mayor Ron Vandewal Councillors: Alan Revill, Ron Sleeth, Mark Schjerning Staff: Wayne Orr, Mark Segsworth, Kim Mattice 1. Call to Order 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest – None 3. Election of Chair – Ron Sleeth Moved by: Alan Revill Seconded: Mark Schjerning Carried 4. Draft minutes of September 23, 2014 Public Services Committee - Draft minutes were provided to members for their perusal. 5. Issues Carried Forward LED Street Lighting Update- Mark informed the members that 480 plus street lights had been converted to date, and that 20 had been missed in the original count and that RealTerm would be st able to convert them by the end of the year. (By the end of the 1 Quarter of 2016). Partially Maintained Roads- Maintenance would be extended to seasonal roads as per Council. No Winter Maintenance signs to be relocated. Traffic Calming – Carleton Drive- It was determined that the temporary humps worked and residents were happy with the results. The humps have been removed for the winter season and would be installed again in the spring on a road rotating basis. Drainage South of Verona Sand Road - There was no solution for the issue as the land was swamp. Long Swamp Road Bridge- Mark informed the Committee that the timber decking had to be replaced. There was inquiry as to the traffic count for the bridge; a traffic count will be performed in the future. Signage Standards- Sign replacement has larger lettering making them more visible. Sign By-Law- Mark informed the Committee that a Draft By-Law had been created and staff were updating. Verona Traffic/Parking Analysis- Mark informed the Committee that this has been ongoing for a year and a half. A courtesy crossing had been painted. Some solution suggestions were: promoting off street parking and depressed sidewalks. The Committee inquired about traffic counts both current and past. Energy Management Plan- The Building Condition Assessment will aid in the required annual update. LED lights should be installed at all Township facilities. Portland WDS Scales - Mark informed the Committee that the Public appeared to have accepted the change. The computer was providing good data; Township contractor trucks had been provided with proximity cards and was working well. We will need at least a year of data for analysis. Speed Analysis- Mark informed the Committee that the analysis was ongoing. This will become a regular Agenda item to add roads to the list to be assessed. Assessments will occur 2 times per year. 6. New Initiatives Guide Rail Protection Assessment- need to develop a multi-year plan which will encompass current post/cable replacement as well as identifying areas that require placement of guiderail. Page 141 of 231 Road Classification- Mark informed the Committee that staff had not yet reviewed every road as of yet. This will be one of the ongoing duties of the new co-op student position. Waste Audit Waste Disposal Site Operations- Mark informed the Committee that staff would be revisiting what materials should be accepted at each site as well as hours of operation for each site. He th noted that on Tuesday, November 24 , the Salem Landfill had only six residents for the day. Long Term Agreement for Sydenham Water- discussion was needed for proposal of ideas. Intersection Reconfiguration – 2 locations on Holleford Road and one location on Latimer Road in Inverary. Assumption of Private Roads Building Condition Assessment - Mark informed the Committee that he was meeting with the Consultant the next day. Commuter Parking Lots Winter Control Plan - It was noted that there was not a Council endorsed Plan. Council endorsed Service Levels – to document current road maintenance practices. Staff will draft a schedule of initiatives, including those identified under Other Business, for prioritization at the next meeting. 7. 10 Year Capital Plan – February 2016 – St 8. Other Business - Solid Waste Collection RFP - Harrowsmith Intersection EA - Perth Road Corridor Study Review - Sydenham parking and traffic - Long Term Waste Disposal - AVL – more efficient running vehicles - EDR – how do other municipalities get funding - Road Sign Inventory - Maintenance on ROW off Burridge Lake Rd 9. Date of Next Meeting – January 21, 2016 (8:30 a.m. – Keeley Board Room) rd (meetings will occur on the 3 Thursday of each month at 8:30 a.m.) 10. Adjournment – 10:30 a.m. Page 142 of 231 Activity Public Services Initiatives Infrastructure planning - — Committee Tentative Date Transportation Master Plan Water System Capacity 2017 February 2016 Water Treatment - Long Term Operations Agreement Spring 2016 Water Distribution - Water Hauling Station 2017 Waste Audit 2017 Collection RFP April 2016 Long Term Disposal Options (Master Plan) WDS Operational Review Scales 2017 Waste Diversion Waste Collection Garbage Disposal — - v — April 2016 - Road and Other Linear Construction Road Maintenance Funding for EDR‘s Delegation at OGRA Partially Maintained Roads Guide Rail Location Assessment Council Endorsed Service Levels May 2016 Fall 2016 Winter Control Plan Fall 2016 Sign By—Law Traffic Calming Signage Standards Verona/Sydenham Parking & Traffic LED Street Light Conversion Commuter Parking Lots Fall 2016 - - - Winter Control Traffic and Safety - — — - — - - Engineering & technical support/input to other departments Public Road & Private Lane Standards Intersection Reconfigurations Assumption of Private Roads Harrowsmith EA Perth Road Corridor Energy Management Plan Building Condition Assessment LED Conversion at Facilities Spring 2016 — - Spring 2016 — — - Facilities Maintenance - - — June 2016 Page 143 of 231 Loughborough District Recreation Committee Minutes ^ \-^ >t Monday, January 25, 2015 Attendance: Chair Mike Howe, CounciUor Ross Sutherland. Paul Wash, Helen Parfitt/ Tracy Holland, Vicki Veldman, Sharon Menard, Maryanne Takala, Scott Takala, Faye Snider and Rob Wilson 1. Approval of the Agenda Motion to approve the agenda. Moved by: Paul Wash Seconded by: Tracy Holland Carried 2. Approval of Minutes - Monday, November 30,2015 . Motion to approve the minutes from Monday, November 30,2015 Moved by: Paul Wash Seconded by: Tracy Holland Carried 3. Business Arising a. Nominations and Election for Chair and Vice Chair Nominations for Chair . Mike Howe was nominated by Paul Wash and was seconded by Maryanne Takala. . Mike Howe accepted the nomination and the vote was unanimous. . Mike Howe will continue as Chair of the Loughborough District Recreation Committee for 2016. Nominations for Vice-Chair . Paul Wash declined to be nominated for Vice-Chair due to time constraints. . Tracy Holland was nominated by Paul Wash and was seconded by Maryanne Takala. . Tracy Holland accepted the nomination and the vote was unanimous. Tracy Holland was elected as Vice-Chair of the Loughborough District Recreation Committee for 2016. b. Canada Day Update The next meeting will be held in eariy February, 2016. Tim Laprade is negotiating with Fireworks FX for one contract across the township instead of one per participating district. Tim is negotiating for a better show and a better price but overall each district has been very happy with the quality of show as well as the professionalism of the employees. Chair Mike Howe wilt attend a Lion's Club meeting to thank them for their participation and to invite them to help facilitate the event once again. Page 144 of 231 There is aligned contract in place with Charlie King to ensure he will be providing the sound system for the event. T1ie Heritage Grant was completed and submitted on time. c. South Frontenac Recreation Committee The committee will be focusing on producing a 5 Year Capital Plan in the in order to organize priorities as well as the budget coming months d. Harris Park TTiere is a new key for the hall and a drop-box system will likely be put in place for renters and user groups. TTie new outdoor ramp has been completely installed. e* Bowes Park The budgeted amount for the playground equipment was approved. f. WllmerPark Additional playground equipment is needed as the current structure is very small and is only suitable for very young children. g. The Point Park ^!-f^a:II-fieldJS_o?.,sch.edufe to be8in being used in sePtember 2016. Fencing is an ^pc? ?ff( ( I r T/ g N AREA REZONED FROM 'RU' TO 'RU-50' u !? M N * W' E s [10 TJ li:r-ir{*l'i'Fl:'illl;I 174@T-1!1 O XO }0 }d' 0 9 1!1 m ff Tk%Q'l%l 'K? W. J : l r o so i:?o 240 I 360 ffi 480 l THIS SCHEDULE "1" TO BY-LAW No. 2016-12 PASSED THIS 1' DAY OF MARCH, 2016 MAYOR CLERK Page 151 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-13 BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LAND FROM SPECIAL OPEN SPACE PRIVATE (OSP-4) TO LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL-WATERFRONT (RLSW), PART LOT 26, CONCESSION V, DISTRICT OF BEDFORD: ISAACS WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to a parcel of land located in Part of Lot 26, Concession V, of the District of Bedford; NOW THF,REFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT Schedule "D", to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Special Open Space Private (OSP- 4) to Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW), for those lands shown on the attached map designated as Schedule " l ". 2. THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, as amended, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by said section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this first day of March, 2016. Read a first and second time this first day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this nrst day of March, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Ron Vandewal, Mayor Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator Page 152 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC (BEDFORD D?STRICT) ?' {,O?'=?0;@ SCHEDULE '1' BY-LAW No. 2016-13 i?t ?Th j? N AREA TO BE REZONED FROM 'OSP-4' TO 'RLSW' .,1%. ] ... l-a".... -.- -,N s[ / i-i ,/ ! y'a'l i j'i a -... ( i: { l i l WffiE .i ..,,. ,: /' /t----.,--. .ll%/ l!,,,,,,,.-=.=.-,,=.-,,.,' Xsp s ) = S l , .. i t , .[ ,,,-,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,;. { :l l % .i ]a' X } ' l ). i i l *. i ' . .. t a. l l .- -.-..-.-..4 X : { BobsLake ' S, i,, : ,z y. [ ' ; BobsLake y .....,,;a .-a % ' ] 7 %, y. y 't X ali :t { ll>., . Q. ,% -' ' s, , . X, '%. 7 f IX l,,l' i" ,= ffi :' a,z--'-'-'--'S% 1 ! S a I t /} -/ ,/ /,.,+ S '% 'l 0, 1, ,, / '-, X=%:. :C r >. S I -.= ... } 7' % .. .?'% .= ] i" l '%. ,. (a ' - ..,z 1. ., -'-," a,,,,(aaa . ' X %):;'=. .}". '1,% x ,,%., ,*. as,,,:i . '%, . l,a..l,.i' 11.,(. .l '% % .= % t '.. aX '2. S, l % %. ..4,,,.1 ...%% : i., ., -'71 %% / %, ,.a ra 0' Xa -., ,') ,/ ..,l'...z.,l'/ %, y - 'X's,X%,IX,%lll,. ; .%: ;' )' l ...;' 's.. ..l,7a'; ,[,= r -. o ':,=a' ,-- -2"""' :>'l('- **,,X==:>a/a,, 8obs Lake X; -,. l.:ll ..l-%....--,-. j,,. ,, --=.0 0 . . THIS SCHEDULE "1" TO BY-LAW No. 2016-13 PASSED THIS 1a' DAY OF MARCH 2016 MAYOR CLERK Page 153 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-14 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND 1059823 0NTARIO LIMITED. WHEREAS a Subdivision Agreement has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCI, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Subdivision Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 0ntario Limited, a copy of which is attached hereto forming part of this by-law. 2. THAT this By-law and Agreement shall be registered on title of the properties described as Part of lots 18 & 19, Concession II, and part of the road allowance between Lots 18 & 19 in the former geographic Township of Storrington/Loughborough, now in the Township of South Frontenac, Frontenac County, Lots 1-7, Blocks 8-12 and Willowbrook Drive and Summerside Drive. 3. THISBY-LAWshallcomeintoforceandeffectinaccordancewithsection51of the Planning Act 1990, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 51. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this first day of March 2016. Read a first and second time this first day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this first day of March, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Ron Vandewal, Mayor Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator Page 154 of 231 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT WillowBrook day of THIS AGREEMENT made in QUADRUPLICATE on the ,2016 BETWEEN: 1059823 0NTARIO LTD. the "OWNER" OF THE FIRST PART - and - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC the oouuxicipxu'ry'o OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owner has received approval from the County of Frontenac (file No. 1 0T-20 1 3/00 1 ) for a plan of subdivision for those lands described in Schedule ?A?; AND WHEREAS approval of the plan of subdivision has been given on the condition that the Owner enter into this agreement with the Municipality in accordance with section 51(26) of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, chapter P-1 3, as amended; NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree with each other as follows: TERMS DEFINED 1. In this agreement: (a) ??" shall mean the elected Council of the Municipality; (b) "Final Certificate of Approval of the Works? means the certificate to be issued by the Municipal Engineer not sooner than one (1 ) year after the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works and after the Municipal Engineer has verified by a final inspection of the Works that they have been constructed and maintained by the Owner in accordance with this Agreement; (C) ????Lands" shall mean those Iands of the Owner described in Schedule ?A?; (d) "%? includes repair; (e) "Municipality" means the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac; (f) "Municipal Engineer? means the Public Works Manager of the Municipality or such other person acting in that capacity, or the consulting engineer appointed for that purpose by Council, and any authorily granted to the Municipal Engineer by this agreement shall be exercised in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and without undue delay; (g) "Municipal Specifications" shall mean the detailed description of construction, materials and workmanship of works to be carried out by the Owner as prescribed by the Municipality in accordance with the ?Ontario Provincial Standards for Roads and Public Works" (OPS), as amended, in effect on the date of the work, or such other additional requirements which may be specified by the Municipality; (h) "Q!?!!!!? includes an individual, a partnership, a corporation, an association, a joint venture, a co-tenant, a trustee, or any agent or contractor carrying out any works for Page 155 of 231 the Owner, and all subsequent owners of all or part of the Lands and wherever the singular is used it shall be construed to include the plural; (i) ?%? or ?Plan of Subdivision" or "Subdivision? means the plan of subdivision approved by the Municipality for the Lands described in Schedule ?A?; "Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works" means the certificate to be issued by the Municipal Engineer after all the Works have been constructed in accordance with this agreement and have been inspected by the Municipal Engineer and approved for use and assumption by the Municipality; (k) "g?" shall mean those public roads or any part or parts thereof, any day lighting triangles, temporary turning circles, and any areas of road widening shown or Iaid out on the Plan of Subdivision, and the use of ?Street? or ?Public Highway? shall be synonymous with ?Road?; m "Warranty Period" means the period of time between the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works and the date of the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works, but in no event shall it be Iess than one (1 ) year', and (m) ?%" means the whole works, services, materials, matters and things required to be done or supplied by the Owner in accordance with this agreement except for the final grading of lots for which lot grading certificates will be supplied by applicants for building permits. ORDER OF PROCEDURE 2. As a condition of this agreement and without which this agreement shall have no effect, the Owner shall: (a) execute and deliver this agreement to the Municipality; (b) obtain a consent and postponement to registration of this agreement in a form satisfactory to the Municipality from the holder of any mortgage or other encumbrance of the Lands that will be outstanding on the date of registration of the Plan; (C) deposit with the Municipality the security and proof of insurance required by this agreement; (d) pay in full all outstanding taxes, drainage and unamortized local improvement charges on the Lands; (e) pay in full all outstanding invoices issued by the Municipality with respect to the Plan; (f) pay to the Municipality the amount of cash to be given in Iieu of parkland, or deposit with the Municipality the executed deeds for the parklands, whichever is applicable and prescribed by this agreement; (g) deliver to the Municipality an original copy and an 215.9 mm X 355.6 mm (8!/2? X 1 4?) reduced copy of the final Plan forwarded to the Municipality for registration; and (h) deliver to the Municipality draft reference plans of survey illustrating all easements and O.3 metre wide reserves not shown on the Plan, and all deeds and grants of easement executed in favour of the Municipality or any other public authority required by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to the Municipality. 3. PriortostartingconstructionoftheWorksinthePIan,theOwnershall: (a) fulfill all of the conditions required by Clause 2 above unless otherwise approved in writing by the Municipal Engineer; (b) notify the Municipal Engineer in writing at least seventy-two hours (72) hours prior to the start of construction; and Page 156 of 231 (c) provide written confirmation to the municipality that the tree preservation plan set out in Schedule ?I?, if applicable, has been complied with. 4. Prior to applying for any permits for construction of buildings within the Plan, the Owner shall have: (a) received final approval for the Plan from the Municipality or the Ontario Municipal Board; (b) received the required approvals from all applicable utility companies and regulatory agencies; (C) registered the Plan and the reference plans of survey referred to in Clause 2(h) above; (d) delivered copies of the final plan of subdivision and any reference plans and engineering plans referred to in this Agreement in an electronic format acceptable to the Municipality; and (e) complied with all requirements for issuing a building permit as set out in this agreement. ATTACHED SCHEDULES s. The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this agreement: Schedule ?A? Description of Lands Schedule "B" Description and Cost of Works to be Constructed Schedule ?C" Description of Phases of Development Schedule "D" Tim6 5chedule for (onstruction of Works Schedule "E? List of Approved Plans for Works to be Constructed Schedule ?F" Lot Grading and Drainage Plans Schedule "G" Lands to be conveyed for Parkland or Cash in Lieu Schedule ?H" Grants of Easement and Other Public Lands Schedule 'T' Parkland, Fencing, Landscaping and Tree Preservation Requirements 6. Schedule ?j' Special Conditions Schedule "K" Notice to Subsequent Purchasers Any plans referred to in any of the Schedules are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. The originals of all plans incorporated by reference in this Agreement are on file in the offices of the Municipality and, in the event of any conflict, the originals on file shall govern. CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS Scope of Work: 7. The Owner shall construct and maintain all of the Works described in Schedule ?B? according to the plans and specifications in Schedules ?E?, ?F? and ?I? in a good and workmanlike manner, to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer and according to Municipal Specifications. 8. If, at any time during construction or maintenance of the Works, the Municipal Engineer determines that modifications to the Works are necessary to provide adequately any of the public services required by the Plan, the Owner shall construct such additional works to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer. Page 157 of 231 Roads 9. The Owner shall construct the granular base course of all roads according to the plans and specifications in Schedules "E", "J" and Municipal Specifications. 10. The Owner shall install asphalt on all roads when directed by the Municipal Engineer and to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer. ?r i . The ovvner shall not cut any roads assumed by the Municipality without the prior written consent of the Municipal Engineer, and all roads shall be restored to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer as soon as possible after completion of the work. 12. All dead-ends and open sides of road allowances in the Subdivision shall be terminated in O.3 metre reserves to be conveyed to the Municipality and held in trust by the Municipality until required for future road allowances or the development of adjacent Iands. 13. Where work is performed on existing roads outside the Plan of Subdivision, they shall be reinstated to their original condition as determined by the Municipal Engineer. 14. If, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer, it is necessary to change the grade of existing roads adjacent to or abutting the Subdivision because of the development of the Subdivision, the Owner shall grade to sub-grade and reconstruct the roads in the manner and within the time stipulated by the Municipal Engineer and according to Municipal Specifications. Storm Water Management System 15. The Owner shall construct the storm water management system to service the land in the Subdivision and adjacent road allowances according to the plans and specifications set out in Schedules ?E? and ?F? and Municipal Specifications, and shall maintain the system until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued. Grading, Landscaping and Parkland Development 16. Upon substantial completion of any ditches, culverts, sidewalks and roads, the Owner shall plant seed in accordance with Municipal Specifications, if any, on all boulevards and other untravelled parts of the public highway as soon as possible during the first available planting season or such later date as may be authorized by the Municipal Engineer, and shall maintain the seed and ensure appropriate growth, including re-seeding as necessary, until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued. 17. The Owner shall rough grade to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer any lots or blocks for which a building permit has not been issued on the date the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works is issued. These lots or blocks shall be seeded, maintained and signed to prohibit dumping. 18. Any landscaping and parkland development shall be carried out, if applicable, in accordance with the plans and specifications set-out in Schedule ?l? and Municipal Specifications. Warning Signs 19. Prior to construction of the Works, signs satisfactory to the Municipal Engineer having dimensions of 1 metre by O.6 metres (2 feet by 3 feet) shall be provided and erected by the Owner at Page 158 of 231 the entrance to the Subdivision which shall read as follows: ?Road Not Assumed by Municipality - Use at Your Own Risk? or such other wording as may be approved by the Municipality's solicitor. These signs shall not be removed without written authorization of the Municipal Engineer. Street Signs and House Numbers 20. The names of all streets within the Plan shall be as shown on the registered Plan of Subdivision. 21. TheOwnershall,withinfouiteen(14)daysfromcompletionofthegranularbasecourseofa road, install to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer all street and traffic signs for the road of a size and shape satisfactory to the Municipality. 22. The Chief Building Official shall allocate all house numbers for use within the Plan of Subdivision. To obtain house numbers, the Owner shall furnish the Chief Building Official with a copy of the registered Plan upon which the Chief Building Official shall designate the proper house number or numbers for each Iot. The Owner agrees that it shall obtain civic addresses for each Lot prior to applying for any building permit for any structure within the Plan. The Owner shall advise each purchaser of a subdivision lot of its correct house number. Public Utilities 23. All utility Iines shall be installed underground unless otherwise specified. Erosion and Sediment Control During Construction 24. Erosion control measures shall be incorporated into the construction plans and specifications in orr3er to control the quality of storm runoff from the Plan during construction. These measures may include: (a) The installation of silt fences wherever there is a possibility of runoff from the construction site onto adjacent street?s or properties; (b) The installation of straw bale barriers ntherever there is a possibility of runoff from the construction site into the municipal storm water system; (C) Fencing the work area to maintain construction activities within the predefined areas; and (d) Locating stockpiles of excavated material or granulars so as to minimize the possibility of runoff beyond the construction zone, and/or containing stockpiles within silt fences. 25. The erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to construction and maintained and monitored by the contractor during construction and until a good growth of vegetation is obtained on all grassed areas and until the new hard surfaced areas are constructed and the site works are completed. 26. All areas disturbed by construction are to be reinstated as soon as possible. PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT 27. The Owner shall develop the Subdivision in phases as set out in Schedule ?C?. Page 159 of 231 For the purpose of this agreement, each phase, including construction of the Works 28. in that phase, shall be undertaken as a separate plan of subdivision and the Owner shall enter a separate subdivision agreement with the Municipality for any subsequent phase. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Owner shall, before proceeding 29. with construction of the second phase: (a) Execute and register on title a subdivision agreement to the satisfaction of the Municipality; (b) obtain a release of the holding symbol ?H? from the zoning of the lands in the phase, if applicable; (c) deposit security prescribed by the subdivision agreement in an amount equal to the cost of the Works in the phase as estimated by the Municipal Engineer immediately prior to the start of construction; (d) obtain the prior written consent of the Municipality; and (e) comply with all other requirements of the subdivision agreement. UTII?TY APPROVALS AND COSTS 30. Prior to registration of the Plan, the Owner shall submit to Hydro One, Bell Canada and any other applicable utility company all plans required for their approval; shall obtain the approval of all applicable provincial and federal regulatory authorities; and shall indemnify the Municipality against all related fees and other charges. 31 . The Owner shall bear the expense of all offsite work attributable to the Subdivision resulting from the approved public works design DRILLING AND BIASTING 32. Prior to any blasting for the installation of the Works, the Owner shall notify the Municipal Engineer in writing at least twenty-four (24) hours before the start of blasting, and shall provide a certificate of insurance with the Municipality as an additional insured and satisfactory to the Municipality for damage and liability resulting from the blasting. 33. If any blasting is to be carried out within 120 metres (393 feet) of an occupied building, the Owner shall give written notice of the period of blasting to the occupant at least two (2) days prior to the start of blasting. 34. All drilling shall be wet drilling. USE AND MAINTENANCE OF ROADS 35. The Owner shall, as and where required by the Municipal Engineer, construct and maintain access roads to the Subdivision for the purpose of construction of services and buildings. The Owner shall also maintain and repair these roads and all other roads within or adjoining the Subdivision to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer. For greater certainty, such maintenance and repair shall include the placing of dust palliatives, the control of erosion and sedimentation runoff, and the removal of Page 160 of 231 mud and other materials carried out onto paved streets, and the repair of any damage caused. If the roads are not maintained to the Municipality's satisfaction, the Municipality may take the necessary action to rectify the problem at the Owner's expense. The Owner shall not permit use by construction vehicles of any streets assumed by the Municipality adjacent to the Subdivision if alternate routes are available. 36. The Owner shall not restrict and shall ensure that no person working in the Subdivision restricts the normal flow of traffic in or outside the Subdivision without the prior written consent of the Municipality. REPAIR AND RELOCATION OF EXISTING SERVICES 37. The Owner shall repair any damage caused by the Owner to any existing road, structure, services or works owned or operated by the Municipality and shall pay for all costs related to the relocation of any existing utilities or services in or outside the Subdivision as may be necessary to accommodate the Subdivision. DRAINAGE 38. The drainage of surface water on the lots and blocks in the Plan is the sole responsibility of the Owner and all subsequent purchasers, who shall provide and maintain adequate drainage of surface water and shall comply with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans as set out in Schedule ?F?, 39. The Lot Grading and Drainage Plans may be amended from time to time on conditions approved by the Municipal Enginee5 such amendments not to take effect until executed by the Owner and Municipality and registered against title to the Iands affected. 40. The Owner shall construct all Works in accordance with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans and specifications set-out in Schedule ?F?, and Municipal Specifications, and the Owner shall maintain sufficient interim drainage and outlets to provide adequate drainage including the installation and removal of culverts when required by the Municipal Engineer, until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued. 41. The Owner agrees that if the drainage works result in drainage or a change of drainage through private third party lands, all work shall be carried out with the approval of and to the satisfaction of the private owners affected and the Municipal Engineer. Any easements acquired by the Owner over third party lands for that purpose shall be conveyed to the Municipality. 42. The Owner shall not interfere with any existing drain or water course except in accordance with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans or with the prior written permission of the Municipal Engineer, but any interference shall not relieve the Owner of responsibility for any damage caused by the interference and the Owner shall indemnify the Municipality against any claims against the Municipality relating to the damage. 43. All contracts of sale by the Owner of any Iot within the Subdivision shall contain the following provision, which shall be incorporated in all deeds from the Owner so that it shall be a covenant running with the Iand for the benefit of the remaining land in the Subdivision: Page 161 of 231 The Transferees, for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, covenant and agree that they will not alter the slope of the lands described herein nor interfere with any drains established on the Iands, except in accordance with the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plans, without the written consent of the Municipality and further that the Transferee will maintain any such alterations approved by the Municipality. This covenant is for the benefit of all other Iands in the Subdivision and shall run with the title to these lands. CONSTRUCTION REFUSE AND FILL 44. The Owner shall promptly dispose of all construction refuse and debris within the Subdivision according to the waste disposal and recycling by-Iaws of the Municipality in effect from time to time. If refuse is not removed within forty-eight (48) hours' notice from the Municipality, the Municipality may remove the refuse and debris at the expense of the Owner. 45. The Owner shall neither deposit nor permit to be deposited surplus fill on public lands within the Subdivision. Furthermore the Owner shall neither remove nor permit to be removed, any fill, top soil, trees or shrubs from public Iands, other than roads, without the writLen consent of the Municipal Engineer. COMMENCEMENT, PROGRESS AND COMPLETION OF WORK 46. The Owner shall not start construction of the Works until the Municipal Engineer has received at Ieast seventy-two (72) hours prior written notice of the intention to commence work, and should for any reason there be a cessation or interruption of work, the Owner shall not resume work until at least forty-eight (48) hours written notice of the intention to resume is again given to the Municipal Engineer. 47. The construction of the Works shall be carried out with reasonable speed and, in any event, the Owner undertakes to complete the Works in time sufficient to: (a) obtain the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Underground Services within one (1 ) year from the date of registration of the Plan; and (b) obtain the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works within two (2) years from the date of registration of the Plan; or by such Iater dates as the Owner and Municipality may mutually agree upon. 48. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Owner agrees to carry out construction of the Works according to the detailed time schedule of works set out in Schedule ?D?, and if there is any conflict be%een the requirements set out above and Schedule ?D?, the provisions of Schedule ?D? shall prevail. 49. A request for an extension of time may be made and shall be submitted in writing to the Municipal Engineer no less than fourteen (1 4) days prior to the date of compliance stating the reasons why compliance is not possible and shall state when the requirements and obligations will be completed. The Municipal Engineer may approve, amend or reject the request for such extension on such terms as the Municipal Engineer considers reasonable. Page 162 of 231 50. If, in the opinion of the Municipal Enginee5 the Owner is not prosecuting or causing to be prosecuted the work required by this agreement within the specified time, or so that it may be completed within the specified time, or is improperly performing the work, or should the Owner neglect or abandon any of the work before its completion, or unreasonably delay the work so that the conditions of this agreement are being violated or carelessly executed, or in bad faith, or should the Owner neglect or fail to renevv or again perform work as may be rejected by the Municipal Engineer as being or having become defective or unsuitable, or should the Owner fail to carry out any maintenance required by this agreement, or should the Owner make, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer, default in any manner in the performance of any of the terms of this agreement, then the Municipal Engineer shall, unless prevented by urgent circumstances, notify the Owner in writing of the default, failure, delay or neglect, and if such notification is without effect for seven (7) clear days after the notice, then the Municipal Engineer shall have full authority and power to immediately purchase any materials and to employ any tools, machinery and workmen as in his opinion shall be required for the proper completion of the work at the cost and expense of the Owner together with a management iee of twenty per cent (20%) of the labour and material value. 51. Any entry upon the Lands by the Municipality or its agents prior to the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works shall be as agent for the Owner and shall not be construed for any purpose whatsoever as an acceptance or assumption of the Works by the Municipality. INSPECTION AND TESTING OF WORKS 52. Prior to the approval of a final lot grading certificate for a lot or block in the Plan of Subdivision, the Municipal Engineer may enter onto the lot or block and inspect the Works and the Iot grading of the Iot or block at such times and with such duration and frequency as the Municipal Engineer considers advisable to erisure that the Works and the Iot grading are being constructed and maintained in accordance with this agreement. If during inspections or testing the Municipal Engineer perceives that construction or maintenance, whether by method or otherwise, constitutes a potential danger to life or property, or construction maintenance does not conform to acceptable practice in order to meet Municipal Specifications, the Municipal Engineer shall have the authority to order stop work by verbal notice to the contractor and/or the Owner's consulting engineer, such notice to be confirmed in writing as soon as possible thereafter, and to order such remedial action as the Municipal Engineer considers advisable. Neither the Municipality nor the Municipal Engineer shall be Iiable for any damages resulting from a stop work order. The Owner shall deliver a copy of this clause to each and every contractor engaged in construction of the Works. 53. Any work not examined to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer prior to backfilling shall be excavated at the Owner's cost. Page 163 of 231 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 54. Employees or agents of the Municipality may enter the Subdivision at any time or from time to time prior to the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works for the purpose of making emergency repairs to any of the Works, and such entry and repair shall not be deemed an acceptance of the Works by the Municipality or an assumption by the Municipality of any liability in connection therewith or a release of the Owner from any obligations under this agreement. The Owner shall pay all costs for emergency repairs. USE OF WORKS BY MUNICIPALITY @l 55. The Works may be used by the Municipality or any other authoneed persons prior to the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works for the purposes for which the Works were designed. Such use shall not be deemed an acceptance of the Works by the Municipality and shall not in any way relieve the Owner of its obligations with respect to the construction and maintenance of the Works, but the Owner shall not be liable for any negligent conduct of the Municipality, its servants, agents or employees. 56. The Owner further acknowledges that the Municipality may inadvertently damage or interfere with the Works in the course of using them, and the Owner hereby waives all claims against the Municipality that it might have arising from normal and reasonable use, interference or damage. WINTER ROAD MAINTENANCE 57. Prior to the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works, the Owner shall be responsible for all winter road maintenance within the Plan, but after the first lift of asphalt has been applied to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer, the Municipality will remove snow from roads within the Subdivision in conjunction with normal snow removal operations elsewhere in the Municipality. 58. The removal of snow from roads within the Subdivision prior to the date of the Preliminary Ceitificate of Approval of the Works shall not be construed for any purpose whatsoever as an acceptance or assumption of the Works or roads by the Municipality. ASSUMPTION OF WORKS 59. Ownership of the Works shall vest in the Municipality upon the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works being issued and, subject to the Owner's continuing obligations to maintain the Works in accordance with this agreement, the Owner shall have no further claims or rights to the Works. WARRANTY OF WORKS 60. The Owrier shall maintain the Works in the Plan other than hydro, telephone and other utility company facilities until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORKS 61. After one (1 ) year from the date of the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works, the Page 164 of 231 Owner may apply to the Municipality for a Final Certificate of Approval of the Works. The application shall include ?as constructed? engineering drawings, duly stamped by the Owner's engineer produced at the original scale on reproducible material such as ?Mylar? or ?chronoflex? together with reproducible reductions measuring 8%? X 14? and an AutoCAD electronic copy suitable to the Municipality and be accompanied by a written request that the Municipal Engineer conduct a final inspection. 62. Upon receipt of the Owner's request, the Municipal Engineer shall again inspect the Works and, if satisfied, shall report to Council that the Works have been maintained satisfactorily and shall recommend that the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works be issued. The Final Certificate of Approval of the Works shall only be issued by Council where all Works have been constructed and maintained to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer. REPIACEMENT OF SURVEY BARS 63. Immediately prior to issuance of the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works, the Owner shall supply an up-to-date certificate from a qualified Ontario Land Surveyor stating that all survey monumentation for corners, bends, and beginnings and ends of curves for streets, easements to the municipality, parklands and other public lands shown on the Plan of Subdivision or any reference plan had been found and was in place on the date of the surveyor's certificate. 64. Prior to Final Subdivision Approval, the Owner shall supply a certificate from a qualified Ontario Land Surveyor confirming that the lots within the Plan conform to the minimum, lot frontage and Iot area requirements of the applicable zoning by-Iaw and comply with the Minimum Distance Separation requirements. The certificate shall be submitted along with the required numbers of originals and copies of the Final Plan with the request for final approval from the Municipality. ENG?NEERING SERV}CES 65. The Owner shall employ an engineer (hereinafter "Owner's Engineer) Iicensed and in good standing with the Professional Engineers of Ontario to supervise all engineering functions including but not Iimited to: (a) the preparation of calculations, contours, designs, plans and specifications; (b) the preparation and furnishing of all required drawings; (C) the preparation of the necessary contracts; (d) the obtaining of all required federal, provincial and municipal approvals; (e) the provision of the field Iayout, contract administration and construction supervision; (f) the maintenance of all records of construction and upon completion to advise the Municipal Engineer of all construction changes and to prepare all final and ?as constructed? plans and drawings as may be required by the Municipal Engineer; (g) acting as the Owner's representative in all matters pertaining to the construction; (h) reviewing all Iot grading and drainage plans and preparing all lot grading certificates in accordance with section 71 ; and the co-ordinating and scheduling to comply with the timing provisions of this agreement and the requirements of the Municipal Engineer for the Works. 66. The Owner agrees to implement the recommendations of any Environmental Impact Assessment and/or Geotechnical Study required by the Municipality and certified by a professional Page 165 of 231 engineer, to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 67. The Owner shall furnish all plans, specifications, designs, calculations, contours, or other information pertaining to the Works as the Municipal Engineer may require. No contract shall be awarded and no work shall commence or be continued without the prior written approval of the design and supervision of the work by the Municipal Engineer. 68. All inspections of the Works shall be performed by the Municipal Engineer whose determination of whether the Works have been constructed according to Municipal Specifications shall be final. MATERIAIS TESTING 69. The Municipal Engineer may require any qualitative or quantitative tests of any materials which have been or are proposed to be used in the construction of the Works, or may require soil tests to be carried out at the Owner's expense but this shall not relieve the Owner of its responsibility to carry out any tests required by good engineering practice. ZONING AND BUILDING RESTRICTIONS 70. Nothing in this agreement shall relieve the Owner of any obligation to comply with all applicable zoning and building by-Iaws in effect from time to time. 71. Allconstructionwithinthesubdivisionshallbecarriedoutinaccordancewithanynoiseby- Iaw of the Municipality that may be in effect from time to time. 72. The Owner agrees to display in a conspicuous place in all sales offices established for the sale of buildings or Iands within the Subdivision all of the following: (a) A zoning map or schedule displaying current zoning for all Iand in and adjacent to the Subdivision. (b) A print of the registered Plan of Subdivision with the following information clearly labelled on it: (i) the permitted uses for all blocks on the plan; (ii) the location of all proposed non-residential uses; and (iii) the Iocation of all proposed medium and high density residential uses. (c) A print of the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plans. 73. The Owner shall also ensure that the foregoing information concerning permitted and proposed uses is communicated to all prospective purchasers by: (a) posting signs of a size and type satisfactory to the Municipality on the Iands in the Plan; and (b) providing this information in writing to all prospective purchasers. If a builder other than the Owner intends to construct and sell buildings on lots within the Plan, the Owner shall take such action as is necessary to ensure the foregoing requirements are met. Page 166 of 231 REQUIREMENTS FOR BUIIDING PERMITS 74. No building permit shall be issued for a Iot or block within the Subdivision until: (a) the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued; (b) a ?Builders road? consisting of the grading, storm drainage and a gravel road base has been constructed to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer; (c) any swale shown on the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans in Schedule ?F? which, in the opinion of the Municipal Engineer should be constructed prior to the issue of a building permit, has been constructed; (d) a lot grading plan for the Lot or Block that shall contain a certificate stamped by the Owner's Engineer, and satisfactory to the Municipality, confirming that the lot grading plan has been reviewed by the Owner's Engineer and is in general conformance with the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plan. The lot grading plan for the Lot or Block shall illustrate the following: (i) all proposed buildings and structures and their elevations; (ii) existing and final grades; (iii) driveways; (iv) natural features and vegetation, existing and removed; and (v) the method of disposing of stormwater. (e) a non-interest bearing refundable deposit of Unree thousand dollars ($3,000) cash or other suitable security has been posted with the Municipality for the lot or block for which a permit has been applied to ensure the following: (i) the cost to repair any damage done to the Works by the applicant, its contractors, employees or workmen, including road cleaning; (ii) delivery to the Municipality of a Iot grading certificate in the form prescribed by the Municipality and signed by the Owner's Engineer on which is indicated: (1) thelotorblockandplannumbertowhichthecertificateapplies; (2) the designed grades and elevations prescribed by the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans for the lot or block corners and the building line; (3) the actual grades and elevations for the lot or block corners, the building corners and any other Iocations as noted on the Subdivision Lot Grading Plan; (4) a statement that the Iot grades and elevations shown are correct; (5) arrovvs showing the direction of overland drainage flow; and (6) a certificate stamped by the Owner's Engineer confirming the grading conforms to the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plan. (f) all lot levies, development charges, water and sewer rates and other charges attributable to the Iot or block have been paid in full; and (g) all other normal requirements of the Municipality prescribed by the Ontario Building Code Act have been complied with. 75. If the Municipal Engineer rejects a Iot grading certificate, the cost for any further review of it shall be deducted from the deposit. 76. If any repairs for damage to the Works, other than emergency repairs that shall be carried out Page 167 of 231 immediately, are not carried out within seven (7) days of written notice to the permit applicant and reg,istered owrier of the land, the Municipality may without further notice, take such action as it deems necessary to carry out the repairs, complete the work or remedy any defective work, and the permit applicant and registered owner of the Iand shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the Municipality, which the Municipality may deduct from the deposit in addition to any other remedies available to it, including adding such costs to the tax roll of the land and collecting them in like manner as municipal taxes in accordance with section 446 of the Municipal Act, 2001, s.o. 2001, c. 25, as amended. 77. If any yards remain unseeded or ungraded, or if a Iot grading certificate has not been delivered Eighteen (18) months from the date on which the building permit was issued, the Municipality may, on at Ieast thirty (30) days prior written notice to the applicant and the registered owner of the lot or block take such action as it deems necessary to complete the work or remedy any defective work, and the applicant and registered owner of the land shall be jointly and severally liable for all costs incurred by the Municipality which the Municipality may, in addition to any other remedies available to it, deduct all or a portion of said costs from the deposit provided for in section 74(e) above. The Municipality shall, upon being satisfied that the lot grading certificate has been issued, release any security being held on account of the said lot. 78. The Owner agrees not to apply for a building permit until all of its obligations related thereto contained in this Agreement are fulfilled. The Owner further agrees that it shall not undertake any grading that does not comply with the approved Lot Grading and Drainage Plan and any lot grading plan submitted in support of a building permit as required by s. 74(d). SPECIAL CONDITIONS 79. In addition to all other provisions of this agreement, the Owner shall also comply with those special conditions related to development of the Subdivision set out in Schedule ?J? attached hereto. CONVEYANCE OF PARKIANDS OR CASH IN IIEU 80. The Owner shall grant to the Municipality Iands in fee simple free of hens and encumbrances for municipal park or other recreational purposes other than roads or shall make a cash payment in lieu thereof as provided by the Planning Act in accordance with Schedule ?G?. The executed deeds for the Iands, together with any reference plans of sutvey necessary to describe them with the registered number of the plans Ieft blank for later completion, shall be delivered to and approved by the Municipality before the Municipality requests final approval of the Plan by the Municipality. GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND OTHER PUBLIC LANDS 81 . The Owner shall obtain and grant to the Municipality and any other required public authority or utility company, those lands, easements, and O.3 metre wide reserves described in Schedule ?H? as may be required for utility, drainage or access purposes, free of all charges and encumbrances. The executed deeds for the lands and grants of easement together with any reference plans of survey necessary to describe them with the registered number of the plans left blank for later completion, shall be delivered to and approved by the Municipality before the Municipality requests final approval of the Plan by the Municipality. Page 168 of 231 RESTRICTION ON TRANSFERS 82. The Owner shall not transfer title to any Iots or blocks within the Plan until after this agreement, all deeds, grants of easement and O.3 metre reserves in favour of the Municipality and any other applicable public authority and utility company, and related refererice plans of survey have been re"g,istered. OWNERS' LIABIIITIES AND INDEMNITY 83. The Owner shall indemnify the Municipality against all actions, causes of action, suits, claims and demands whatsoever which may arise from the actions of the Owner and not caused by the negligent acts of the Municipality, its employees, servants and agents until the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued, and thereafter for any reason arising from the Owner's maintenance of or failure to maintain the Works until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has beeri issued. oWNER'S EXPENSE 84. It is the intent of this Agreement that the Municipality shall not incur any expense for the development of the Subdivision and every obligation of the Owner under this agreement shall be deemed to include the words ?at the expense of the Owner?, unless specifically stated otherwise. MUNICIPAIITIS LEGAL, PLANNING, ENG?NEERING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 85. The Owrier agrees to pay the legal, engineering, Iandscape architectural, planning and administrative costs incurred by the Municipality to process the Plan including but not limited to the preparation of this agreement and all plans and specifications, and the supervision and inspection of the Works and the Municipality shall provide copies of any invoices for such costs. PAYMENT OF ACCOUNTS 86. All invoices, costs and expenses received or incurred by the Municipality and payable by the Owner shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the Municipality's invoice or demand for payment to the Owner, failing which the Owner shall be in default under this agreement and shall continue in default until payment plus all accrued interest is made in full. 87. Interest shall be paid by the Owner on all overdue amounts at the same rate per annum and calculated in the same manner as the Municipality charges on overdue municipal taxes and any payments received shall be applied first on account of accumulated interest and then on the outstanding amount. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS 88. The Owner agrees to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise, of the Township concerning the provision of municipal services including fencing, lighting, landscaping, sidewalks, roads, installation of services, signage, and provision of drainage. Page 169 of 231 89. As a condition of this agreement and without which this agreement shall have no effect, the Owner shall deposit with the Treasurer of the Municipality as security for the performance of the Owner's obligations under this agreement, an irrevocable security issued by a Canadian chartered bank or any other similar form of security issued by a financial institution acceptable to the Municipality in a form approved by the Municipality and in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the Works as set out in Schedule ?B?. RELEASE OF SECURITIES 90. The Owner may, when not in default, apply to the Municipality as construction of the Works proceeds, for releases of its security at regular intervals, and each application shall include an up-todate estimate of the cost to complete the Works verified by the Owner's engi neer and the Municipal Engineer. 91 . Upon receipt of an application, the Municipal Engineer may authorize the release of such portion of the security as the Municipal Engineer may, in all of the circumstances consider reasonable, but without Iimiting its generality, the following rules shall apply: 1 . The amount of the security retained by the Municipality excluding any amounts held for warranty or Construction Lien Act purposes, shall not, at any time, be less than the up-to-date estimated cost to complete the Works. 2. The Municipality shall deduct the following amounts from the security otherwise available for release: (a) ten percent (10%) of the value of the work performed since the date of the Iast release as determined by the Municipal Engineer, which the Municipality shall hold pursuant to Part IV of the Constructjon Lien Act; (b) an amount sufficient to satisfy any construction hens of which the Municipality has notice in respect of any portion of the Works Iocated on a public street or highway, or on any Iands conveyed to the Municipality or any other public authority; and (c) tenpercent(10%)ofthevalueoftheWork,whichtheMunicipalityshallhold as security for the Ovvner's obligations during the Warranty Period. INSURANCE 92. As a condition of this agreement, the Owner shall keep in force until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works has been issued, a comprehensive policy of public liability and property damage insurance acceptable to the Municipality, that provides insurance coverage in respect of any one occurrence to the limit of at least five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) exclusive of interest and costs, against loss or damage resulting from bodily injury to, or death of one or more persons and loss of or damage to properq. The policy shall name the Municipality as an additional insured. 93. The policy shall provide coverage against all claims for all damage or injury including death to any person or persons or damage to any property of the Municipality or any other public or private Page 170 of 231 property resulting from or arising out of any act or omission on the part of the Owner or any of its servants or agents during the construction or maintenance of the Works. The policy shall include completed operations coverage liability, blanket written contractual Iiability with respect to non-owned licensed vehicles and shall have no exclusion pertaining to shoring, blasting (unless a separate certificate of insurance for blasting is provided prior to the start of blasting), excavating, underpinning, demolition, pile driving, caisson work and work below ground surface including tunnelling and grading. The issuance of a policy of insurance shall not be construed as relieving the Owner from responsibility for other or Iarger claims, if any, for which the Municipality may be held responsible. 94. The Owner shall provide the Municipality with a Certificate of Insurance in a form satisfactory to the Municipality together with such proof as the Municipality may require that all premiums on the policies of insurance have been paid and that they are in full force and effect. If the Owner fails to pay premiums or otherwise keep the policies in force, the Municipality may pay premiums or take out additional policies as it considers necessary and the Owner shall pay all costs. CONSTRUCTION IIENS 95. The Owner shall hold back from its payment to any persons who may supply services or materials in connection with the construction or maintenance of the Works, all amounts required by the Construction Lien Act, and shall indemnify the Municipality against any claims, actions or demands in connection with the Works and all costs reasonably incurred by the Municipality as a result thereof. 96. If any Iien is claimed pursuant to the Construction Lien Act for the supply of services or material in connection with the construction or maintenance of any portion of the Works located on a public street or highway or any lands owned by the Municipality or any other public authority, the Owner shall be considered in default under this agreement and shall continue to be in default until all Iiens are discharged, and the Municipality may, in its absolute discretion, use the security deposited by the Owner to pay into court any amount?s required to discharge all hens plus costs. 97. The Owner shall have the certificate or declaration of its engineer that construction of the Works has been substantially performed published in a construction trade newspaper in accordance with the Construction Lien Act and shall provide the Municipality with proof of publication, but neither the issue or publication of such certificate or declaration shall impose any obligation on either the Municipality or the Municipal Engineer to issue either a Preliminary Certificate of Approval of Underground Services, a Preliminary Certificate of Approval of the Works or a Final Certificate of Approval of the Works, as the case may be. DEFAULT PROVISIONS 98. Wheriever the Owner is deemed by the terms of this agreement to be in default, the Municipality will make best efforts, unless prevented by urgent circumstances, to give the Owrier notice of the default including a brief description of the remedial action required and the date by which such remedial action shall be completed. 99. If the Owner fails or refuses to remedy the default within the time prescribed in the notice, the Municipality shall have the right in addition to any other remedies available to it and without further notice to the Owner to use any security held by it to remedy the default and recover all costs and damages incurred by and all amounts owing to the Municipality. Page 171 of 231 REGISTRATION 100. The Owner consents to the registration of this agreement by the Municipality against the title to the Lands. 101. TheMunicipalityshallregisterthisagreementandanydeedsorgrantsofeasementorrightsof-way in favour of the Municipality without undue delay after registration of the Plan. NOTICE TO SUBSEQUENT OWNERS AND PURCHASERS 102. In accordance with s. 51(26) of the Planning Act, all of the terms and conditions of this agreement may be enforced against the Owner and any and all subsequent owners of any lot, block or part thereof in the Plan. 103. Inaddition,eachandeverysubsequentowneroftheLandsorapartthereofacknowledges notice of all of the provisions of this agreement and, in particular, those provisions set out in Schedule IIKII ARBITRATION 104. Any dispute between the parties with respect to this agreement shall, at the request of a party, be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Arbitration Act, and the decision of the arbitrator or, if more than one, the decision of a majority shall be final and binding on the parties. 105. Eachpartyshallpayitsowncostsofthearbitrationandshallshareequallythecostsofthe arbitrator(s). CANCELIATION OF AGREEMENT 106. IfthePlanofSubdivisionisnotregisteredwithinone(1)yearfromthedateofthisagreement, the Municipality may, at its option, declare this agreement to be null and void. TIME OF THE ESSENCE 107. Time shall be of the essence of this agreement. LEGAI NOTICE TO OWNER 108. Any notice required to be given by the parties to this agreement shall be given by registered mail at the address for service of the parties on the title page of this agreement, or at such other addresses as the parties may specify from time to time, (provided that in the event of a postal disruption, notice shall only be given by hand) and shall be deemed to have been delivered on the third day after the date of deposit in the post office). FURTHER ASSURANCES 111. The parties shall, upon reasonable request of the other, execute any further documents as may be required for the more perfect and absolute performance of the terms and conditions of this Page 172 of 231 agreemeint. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 112. Thisagreementshallbebindinguponandenuretothebenefitofthepartiesheretoandtheir respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this agreement as at the date first set out above. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Per: Ronald Vandewal, Mayor Wayne Orr, CAO We have the authority to bind the corporation 1059823 0NTARIO LTD. Per: Page 173 of 231 SCHEDUIE "A" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF IANDS Part Lots 18- 19, Concession 2, and part of the road allowance between Lots 18 and 19 in the former geographic Township of Storrington/Loughborough, now in the Township of South Frontenag Frontenac County. Lots 1 - 7, Blocks 8-12 and Willowbrook Drive and Summerside Drive. Page 174 of 231 SCHEDULE "B? OF SUBDMSION AGREEME: NT I COST OF WORKS ENGINEER'S ESTI]VIATF, OF COST TO COMPLETE WILLOWBROOK ESTATES SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 LOTS 1to 7 Original Cost Cost to to Construct Complete CLEARING AND GRUBBING of Roadway $14,100 $0 STRIP TOPSOIL of Roadway $17,500 $0 GRANULAR BASE ROADS $82,200 $0 GRADING FOR ROAD ALLOWANCE including Cut/Fill for Floodplain Compensation $204,500 $0 DESCRIPTION AND COST OF WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED EROSION CONTROL TOPSOIL & SEED - ROADSIDE DITCHES SWALES (including Topsoil and Sod) $5,000 $0 $49,000 $49,000 s6,600 $3,600 $52,800 $52,800 culverts) $46,800 $0 STREETLIGHT SYSTEM $17,100 $0 SIGNS $1,400 $0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - PERTH ROAD $10,300 $10,300 UTILITIES SYSTEM (Bell, Transformer Pads & Ducts) $37,760 $0 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (Transformation & Wiring) $26,680 $0 DITCH & TOPSOIL & SEED ON PERTH ROAD $29,500 $18,000 TREE PLANTING (One tree per lot) $2,500 $2,500 LANDSCAPING BUFFER $25,000 $25,000 PERTH ROAD - Right Turn Taper (includes asphalt, granulars & line painting) $19,445 $19,445 SUB-TOTAL $648,185 $180,645 CONTINGENCIES (5% of construction cost) $32,409 $9,032 ASPHALT STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM including culverts (not including driveway ENGINEERING INSPECTION & TESTING (7% of construction cost) $45,373 $12,645 $725,967 $202,322 H.S.T. (1.76% municipal rate) $12,777 $3,561 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $738,744 $205,883 SUB-TOTAL Value of Work Completed $523,645 Maintenance Holdback (5% of work completed) $26,182 Lein Holdback (10%) $52,365 Total Securities Required $284,430 Date of this Estimate: September 4, 2015 i9ESS/i 4f()?FEss/%?4< p'i ';'kl % ': JJI.JOSSELYN $ Q ? Paop 1 Page 175 of 231 SCHEDUIE "C" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT DESCR?PTION OF PHASES OF DEVEtOPMENT The subdivision shall be developed in two (2) phases. Prior to registration of the second phase of development, the Owner shall execute a subdivision agreement for that phase and provide all required securities and otherwise comply with the requirements of the Municipality. Page 176 of 231 SCHEDULE "D" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT TIME SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS 1 . Construction of the Subdivision shall commence forthwith upon registration of the Plan. Page 177 of 231 SCHEDULE ?E? OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT APPROVED PIANS FOR WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED Drawing No. Gl - General Plan Sheet 1 Scale: 1:750 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawirug No. G2 - General Plan Sheet 2 Scale: 1:750 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. LGP? - Lot Grading and Servicing Plan Sheet 1 Scale: 1:750 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. LGP2 - Lot Grading and Servicing Plan Sheet 2 Scale: 1:750 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawinrg No. Ul - Utility/Landscape Plan Sheet 1 Scale: 1:750 Revision 2, June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. U2 - Utility/Landscape Plan Sheet 2 Scale: 1:750 Revision 2, June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawinq No, U3 - Utility Plan Details Scale: Not to Scale Revision 1, June 2, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Enrgineerinrg Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 1 - Perth Road, sta: 0+020 to sta: 0+260 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Dated April 28, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 2 - Perth Road, Sta: O+260 to Sta: O+520 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Dated April 23, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 2A - Perth Road, sta: O+500 to sta: O+740 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Dated April 20, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 3 - Perth Road, sta: 0+180 to sta: O+420 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Dated April 23, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawinq No. 3A - Perth Road Inset Scale: vl:250 Dated April 23, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 4 - Willowbrook Drive, Sta: 1+OOO to Sta: 1+140 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. s - Summerside Drive, Sta: 2+020 to Sta: 2+280 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Revision 2, June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 6 - Summerside DriVe, Sta: 2+280 to Sta: 2+520 Scale: vl:50, hl:500 Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Page 178 of 231 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 7 - Details Scale: Not to Scale Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 8 - Storm Management Details Scale: Not to Scale Revision 1, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawirur) No. 9 - Details Scale: Not to Scale Dated ]s.pril 20, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 10 - Sediment and Erosion Control Scale: 1:1250 Revision 2, dated June 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. 11 - Floodplain Compensation Scale: 1:500 Dated April 20, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. Ll - Entrance Sign Details Scale: As Noted Revision 2, dated August s, 2015 Prepared by Wentworth Landscaping Inc., Kingston, Ontario Drawing No. Dl - Willowbrook Subdivision Scale: 1? = 80'-0" Revision 1, dated March 24, 2015 Prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., Kingston, Ontario THE ORIGINAI PIANS IISTED IN THIS SCHEDULE AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOW ON FILE IN THE MUNICIPAL OFFICES AND SHAII GOVERN IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISPUTE. Page 179 of 231 SCHEDULE ?F? OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT LOT GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS SEE PLANS LISTED IN SCHEDULE ?E? Page 180 of 231 SCHEDULE "G" OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT LANDS TO BE CONVEYED FOR PARKLAND OR CASH IN LIEU The Owner shall convey to the Municipality 5% of the Iand included in the Plan for park purposes. Alternatively, the Municipality may require cash in Iieu for all or a portion of the conveyance to be paid proportionately prior to registration of the Plan. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that additional Parkland and/or cash in lieu shall be required upon registration of the second phase of development. Page 181 of 231 SCHEDUIE "H" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT CONVEYANCES, GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS 0.3 METRE RESERVES The Owner shall convey Blocks 9, 10 and 12 Plan 13M- to the Municipality in iee simple, free and clear of all encumbrances, for the purpose of a O.3 metre reserve. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The Owner shall convey to the Municipality an easement over Lot 6, 1 3M- , described as Part 1, Plan 1 3R- for the purposes of storm water management. TEMPORARY TURNING CIRCLE The Owner shall convey a temporary easement to the Municipality over Part 2, Plan 1 3R- for purposes of a temporary turning circle. The Municipality shall release the easement at such time as the Plan of Subdivision for Phase 2 is registered arid Summerside Drive is extended into Phase 2 to the satisfaction of the Municipality. HYDRO ONE The Owner shall convey an easement to Hydro One Networks Inc. over Parts 3, 4 and s, Plan 1 3Rfor purposes of an electrical transmission Iine. Page 182 of 231 SCHEDULE 'T' OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT PARKIAND, FENCING, LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS SEE PLANS LISTED IN SCHEDULE ?E? In addition to the foregoing, 1. The Owner shall protect all trees within the Plan of Subdivision existing as of the date of the execution of this Agreement, including the installation of protective fencing, if necessary, in accordance with the Lot Grading Plan and OPS 565, but in the event of a conflict between them, the decision of the Municipal Engineer will be final. 2. The Owner shall replace all existing trees that are damaged or have died during construction of the Works with a tree of a type and size satisfactory to the Municipality. This provision shall not apply to any trees removed to facilitate road construction or storm water pond construction. 3. The Owner shall prepare a tree preservation plan to the satisfaction of the Municipality which identifies trees to be protected and preserved and the methods for doing so. The Owner shall implement the tree preservation plan during construction. The Owner of every Lot or Block wt'iere a tree(s) has been identified to be protected shall not remove or damage the identified tree(s) unless a certified arborist determines that the tree is diseased or needs to be removed. 4. The Owner shall prepare a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Township showing tree planting to be carried out, including without limitation: a. one tree to be planted by the Owner in the front yard of each Iot; b. a planting area or screen buffer along the rear Iot Iine of those Iots abutting Perth road (Lots 1 - 4 in phase 1 and Lots s - 9 in phase 2). The existing natural vegetation abutfing the existing residential properties on Davidson Road shall be retained and maintained to buffer and screen Lot 4 and s from view of the existing lots. The planting area or screen buffer may include additional trees for each lot, berms, vegetation, and other measures to the satisfaction of the Municipality and shall be in accordance with the Municipality's site plan control guidelines; and c. all trees shall be of a type, size and located as specified in the Municipality's Site Plan Guidelines. s. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all plantings shall be subject to a warranty period of twenty-four (24) months from the date of satisfactory installation as determined by the Municipality. Page 183 of 231 SCHEDULE "j" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT SPECIAL CONDIT?ONS CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE SWALES 1 . The Owner shall construct and seed such rear yard swaIes and swaIes along the boundaries of the Subdivision as part of the underground services as the Municipal Engineer considers advisable, and the Owner acknowledges that the Preliminary Certificate of Approval of Underground Services will not be issued until such work has been completed to the satisfaction of the Municipal Engineer. CERT?FIED FOOTING ELEVATION 2. Prior to the pouring of footings for any building within the Plan of Subdivision, the Owner shall provide a certificate provided by a qualified Professional Engineer or Ontario Land Surveyor confirming that the elevation of the underside of the footing of the building is in accordance with the approved plans, or as otherwise approved by the Municipal Engineer. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 3. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that permission is required pursuant to Ontario Regulation 148/06 (Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses) prior to commencing rough grading, stockpiling, road construction or other site alteration within 30 m of the wetland, and/or within 15 m of the 100.00 m GSC flood elevation on the Lands. 4. The Owner shall prepare a Iot grading and drainage plan as well as a sediment and erosion control plan. Each plan shall be submitted to the Municipality and the Conservation Authority. Once each plan is approved by the Municipality, the plans shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement without the need for further amendment to the Agreement. The Owner agrees to implement the approved plans. s. The Owner shall implement the stormwater management plan prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc. dated April 17, 2015. The Owner further agrees that it shall implement all necessary site drainage requirements to the satisfaction of the Municipality and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority for each phase of development. 6. The Owner shall have a floodplain compensation plan prepared by a qualified Professional Engineer to the satisfaction of the Municipality and the Conservation Authority. Once approved, the floodplain compensation plan shall be incorporated by reference into this Agreement without the need for further amendment to the Agreement. The Owner agrees to implement the approved floodplain compensation plan. AGREEMENTS OF PURCHASE AND SAIE 7. The Owner shall include in each Agreement for the purchase and sale of any of the lands in the Plan of Subdivision that the purchaser of any Iot or Block will be bound by the following provisions which shall, without Iimiting the generality of the foregoing, also form part of this Agreement: a. The Purchasers of Lots 1, 2 and 3 are advised that any dwelling constructed shall be oriented such that a front faqade of the dwelling (or architectural treatment simulating a front faqade) shall face a Perth Road and such design shall be to the satisfaction of Page 184 of 231 the Municipality. Every Purchaser of any of Lots 1, 2 or 3 agree not to apply for building permits until the design of the proposed dwelling conforms to this provision. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the decision as to what method of construction shall satisfy this requirement shall be that of the Municipality in its sole and unfettered discretion; b. Purchasers of Lots 6 and 7 of phase 1, and Block 8 are advised that site alteration and construction (including but not limited to buildings, structures, filling and grading) on these Iots may require permission under Ontario Regulation 148/06 (Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses); c. Purchasers of Lots 6 and 7 of phase 1 and Lots 4, 3, 2, and 1 of phase 2 are advised that they shall maintain the natural soil and vegetation within the 30 m setback area from the wetland in a natural state and in accordance with the recommendations of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority letter dated July 21, 2014 addressed to the County of Frontenac as well as the Municipality's environmental protection policies; d. Purchasers are advised that existing soil conditions will necessitate the importation of suitable fill for the installation of a sewage system, resulting in a fully raised sewage system; e. Due to the necessity of constructing a raised sewage system, purchasers are advised that sewage pumps may be required; f. Purchasers of lots where the sewage system Iocation occurs in the front yard are advised that driveways must be constructed outside of the sewage system location. SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS / WELLS 8. All on-site sewage disposal systems shall be installed in accordance with all applicable law and in accordance with any permits issued by KFL&A Public Health. 9. The Owner agrees to implement all recommendations outlined in the letter dated November 22, 2013 from KFL&A Public Health, to the satisfaction of the Municipality and KFL&A Public Health for each phase of development. 10. The Owner shall provide to all Purchasers the Hydrogeology, Terrain Analysis and Soil Stockpile Sampling Report dated October 10, 2013 prepared by XCG Environmental Engineers and Scientists. Further, the recommendations contained in this report shall be complied with for each phase of development, including without limitation the following rB(@mmendations: i) Each well shall be assessed by a qualified hydrogeologist for water quantity and quality. The hydrogeologist shall, at a minimum, provide an opinion on the suitability of each well to be used for domestic purposes and provide recommendations on compensatory water flow and/or any water treatment measures required; ii) Each well, including existing test wells, shall be properly developed and upgraded to include, at a minimum, vermin proof capping. 11. AIIrecommendationscontainedintheletterdatedJuly23,20l4fromXCGEnvironmental Engineers and Scientists shall be complied with, including without limitation requirements for: a. filtration; b. disinfection (i.e. UV light); C. potential for additional measures including, a hydrogen peroxide, air or sodium hypochlorite drip system; d. potential for water softening; and e. potential for reverse osmosis systems. Page 185 of 231 12. The Owner agrees that any existing wells and/or septic systems present on the Plan that are not to be used as part of the Plan of Subdivision shall be decommissioned in accordance with all applicable laws. 13. The Owner shall develop a site servicing plan for each Lot and Block showing, without limitation, the Iocation of the house or other primary structure, well, and primary and alternate sewage system locations. The site servicing plan shall be provided to all purchasers of Iots in the Plan. 14. The Owner agrees that the Iocations for the primary and alternate sewage system shall be reserved and maintained solely for that purpose. No construction of wells, structures, driveways, pools or garages shall take place within the areas reserved for the primary and alternate sewage system. 15. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that any deviation from the location on the approved site servicing plan may require the submission of an engineering report and/or design and terrain analysis to support the proposed changes, which report shall include potential impacts on adjoining properties. TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES 16. Prior to commencing any work within the Plan, the Owner must confirm that sufficient wire line communication/telecommunication infrastructure is currently available within the proposed development to provide those services to the proposed development. 17. The Owner is advised that if that infrastructure is not available, the Owner may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Owner elects not to do so, the Owner shall demonstrate to the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development to enable the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services such as 911 Emergency Services, at a minimum. 18. The Owner agrees to grant to Bell Canada any easements that may be required for telecommunication services. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that said easements may be subject to final servicing decisions. 19. The Owner agrees to enter into any and all servicing agreements (Letter of Understanding) as required to service the lands within this Plan, with Bell Canada or another utility service provider, to comply with any underground servicing conditions imposed by the Municipality and if no such conditions are imposed, the Owner shall advise the Municipality of the arrangements made for such servicing. Executed copies of all servicing agreements shall be provided to the Municipality prior to Final Approval of the Plan. POSTAL SERVICE 20. The Owner shall install a Centralized Community Mail Box and associated Iighting at a location on the road allowance of Willowbrook Drive near the entrance to the development at Perth Road along the side yard of Lot 1 in Phase 1, to the satisfaction of the Municipality and Canada Post, or at an alternative Iocation approved in advance by Canada Post and the Municipality. Page 186 of 231 ARCHAEOIOGICAI REQUIREMENTS 21. In the event that deeply buried or previously undiscovered archaeological deposits are discovered in the course of development or site alteration, all work must immediately cease and the site must be secured. The Cultural Program Branch of the Ministry of Culture (416314-7123) must be immediately contacted. The Algonquins of Ontario must also be contacted where remains or artifacts of aboriginal origins are discovered. The Algonquins of Ontario may be contacted at: 31 Riverside Drive, Suite 101, Pembroke, Ontario K8A 8R6, (613) 735-3759 algonquins@nrtco.net. 22. In the event that human remains are encountered during construction, all work must immediately cease and the site must be secured. The Ontario Provincial Police, the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Regulation Unit of the Ontario Ministry of Consumer Services (416-326-8404), and the Cultural Program Branch of the Ministry of Culture must be immediately contacted. 23. The Owner agrees that all recommendations of the Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1 & 2) Reports, dated January 2009 by the Cataraqui Archaeological Research Foundation be implemented to the satisfaction of the Municipality for each phase of the development. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 24. Notwithstanding anything else contained in this Agreement, the Owner agrees to upgrade Perth Road at the entrance to the Subdivision to the Municipality's satisfaction to facilitate ingress and egress, including the construction of a southbound right taper lane. 25. The Owner agrees to pay all costs incurred by the Municipality to install a 1.5 m wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Perth Road from the northern Iimit of Willowbrook Drive to the noithernmost Iimit of the Subdivision which abuts Perth Road, just south of the two commercial blocks (including all land along Lot 1 in Phase 1 and Lots s - 9 inclusive in Phase 2). The total cost of construction of the sidewalk abutting Phase 1 shall be provided to the Municipality by the Owner at the time of registration of this Agreement. The Owner shall provide security for the balance of the sidewalk to be constructed in Phase 2 at the time of execution of the subdivision agreement for phase 2. 26. Owners of all lots shall obtain entrance permits from the Municipality, Public Works Depaitment. The location of all driveways and the size of associated driveway culverts for each Iot shall be determined by the Public Works Department in consultation with the owner. 27. The Owner shall convey Block 8 to the owner of the adjacent properq, described as RDAL BTN LT 18 LT 19 CON 2 STORRINGTON/LOUGHBOROUGH LYING N OF PT 1 13R-19006 & S OF PT 1 oN 13R12320; PT LT 19 CON 2 STORRINGTON/LOUGHBOROUGH AS IN FR522933 (5THLY) LYING N OF PT 1, 13R19006 & W OF PT 4 RP1401 EXCEPT PT 1 13R11203, PT 1 13R'12303 & PT 1 & 2 13R12320; SOUTH FRONTENAC (PIN 36292-0158 (LT)). The conveyance shall be subject to a deeming by-law to be passed by the Municipality to permit title to both parcels to merge in the name of the adjacent owner. This conveyance shall be completed no Iater than the date that the Subdivision Agreement for Phase 2 is registered. 28. The Owner shall install permanent markers and signage along the rear lot Iines at the rear lot corners of Lots 6 and 7 of Phase 1 and Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Phase 2, to identify the boundary of the Environmental Protection Area Block (Block 8). The Lot grading and drainage plan shall identify the location of the markers and signage and identify this mandatory requirement. 29. The Ovvrier agrees to install street lights to the satisfaction of the Municipality, including Page 187 of 231 Iighting at the entrance to the development at Perth Road, such that Iighting also illuminates the Iocation of the Centralized Community Mail Box, and at the temporary turning circle in phase 1 . 30. The Owner agrees that it shall comply with all conditions outlined in the letter dated July 21, 2014 from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority addressed to the County of Frontenac for each phase of development. 31 . The Ovvrier shall ensure that all natural soil and vegetation within the 30 m setback atea from the wetland is maintained in its natural state. 32. All services shall be installed underground. Page 188 of 231 SCHEDULE ?K" OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT NOTICE TO SUBSEQUENT PURCHASERS Each owner and subsequent owner of any lot, block or part thereof against the title of which this agreement has been registered is hereby given notice that the following clauses in the agreement to which this schedule forms a part may contain provisions and impose obligations that may affect the individual's ownership and use of such lot, block or part thereof. Brief Description Item Drilling and Blasting No person shall drill or blast without first notifying the Municipal Engineer and delivering a certificate of insurance. Notice to adjoining properties may be required. Drainage All grading and Iandscaping of lots must be carried out strictly in accordance with the Lot Grading and Drainage Plans. Construction Refuse and Fill The Owner shall remove all construction refuse from the job site at its own expense and dispose of it in accordance with the municipal by-laws. No fill shall be deposited on or removed from public lands without the consent of the Municipal Engineer. Commencement, ProBress and Completion Subject to the detailed time schedule in of Work Schedule ?D? the Owner shall install all underground services within one (1 ) year and complete construction of the subdivision within two (2) years from the date on which the plan of subdivision is registered or such later date as may be agreed on. Inspection of Works Winter Road Maintenance The Municipal Engineer has the authority to enter onto the property for the purpose of inspecting the Works and lot grading and may order stop work by verbal notice to any person where it is perceived that any construction constitutes a potential danger to life or property or is otherwise in contravention of the Subdivision Agreement. Prior to the Municipality assuming the roads and services within the Plan, the Municipality teserves the right to determine if it will carry out snow removal Warran'q of Works It is the responsibility of the Owner to maintain all services installed in the subdivision until the Final Certificate of Approval of the Works is issued. Zoning and Building Restrictions All construction shall comply with all applicable by-laws including the zoning, building and noise by-laws. The Owner and all builders must communicate information about proposed land uses in the subdivision to all prospective purchasers Requirements for Building Permits No building permits shall be issued until all of the requirements specified have been complied with including payment of a refundable deposit. Special Conditions Land in the subdivision shall be subject to the Special Conditions set out in Schedule 111 lllll Easements Schedule ?H? sets out a list of those lots that will be subject to public and utility easements and reserves. Page 189 of 231 Restrictions on Trans(ers The Owner shall not transfer title to any lots or blocks until the requirements in Schedules ?G? and ?H? have been fulfilled. Human remains All owners are advised that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction, that all work shall immediately stop and the appropriate authorities shall be contacted in accordance with conditions 22 and 23 in Schedule "J" Page 190 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-15 BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A CONDOMINIUM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND 1324789 ONTARIO INC. AND MAGENTA WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. WHEREAS a Condominium Agreement has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the Owner; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Condominiurn Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1324789 0ntario Inc. and Magenta Waterfront Development Corporation, a copy of which is attached hereto forming part of this by-law. 2. THAT this By-law and Agreement shall be registered on title of the properties described as Part of Lots 20 and 21, Concession V, and Pert of the Road Allowance Between Concessions 4 and s, closed by By-law FCl96575, geographic Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac, being Parts 1 - 40 inclusive, 42 - 44 inclusive, 48 and 49, on Plan 13R-2 1240. 3. THISBY-LAWshallcomeintoforceandeffectinaccordancewiththeprovisions section 7 of the Condominium Act 1998, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 7. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this first day of March, 2016. Read a first and second time this first day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this first day of March, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Ron Vandewal, Mayor Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator Page 191 of 231 CONDOMINIUM AGREEMENT Applewood THIS AGREEMENT made in triplicate this day of ,2016. BETWEEN: 1324789 0NTARIO INC. and MAGENTA WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION hereinafter referred to as the ?OWNER? OF THE FIRST PART - and - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC hereinafter referred to as the ?Municipality? OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Municipality recommended approval of a Draft Plan of Condominium for Iands more particularly described on Schedule ?A? attached hereto (the ?Owner's Lands?); AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac approved the Draft Plan of Condominium for the Owner's Lands and imposed draft plan conditions, pursuant to the Planning Act, as amended ; AND WHEREAS the Plan of Condominium creates 22 Residential Units, 1 solar panel Unit, a common access road, a common docking facility, a common waterfront park, common waterfront park access, parking area and an access bridge, with the common elements owned by the Condominium Corporation (as such term is defined below) and governed by the Condominium Act, 1998 (the ?Act") the Declaration and the By-Iaws of the Condominium Corporation, each Unit owner being an owner of the Condominium Corporation; AND WHEREAS it is a condition to draft plan approval that the Owner enter into a Condominium Agreement with the Municipality and register this Agreement on title to the Owner"s Lands in accordance with section 51(26) of the Planning Act; AND WHEREAS the Owner shall register a Declaration and Description under the Actin order to create a Vacant Land Condominium Corporation upon the Lands described in Schedule "A? attached hereto, and upon creation of the Vacant Land Condominium Corporation (the "Condominium Corporation?), the Condominium Corporation shall assume all of the obligations of the Owner pursuant to this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH thatin consideration of the approval by the Municipality of the Plan of Condominium and other good and valuable consideration, the Owner hereby agrees with the Municipality as follows: 1 . The Owner shall, at it?s sole risk and expense and to the satisfaction of the Municipality, construct, use, operate and maintain those facilities and works set out in the Plan of Condominium Drawings in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Plan of Condominium Drawings Iisted in Schedule "C" are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, the Owner agrees that it shall build all private Ianes to the Municipal standard for private lanes. The Page 192 of 231 2 originals of the Plan of Condominium Drawings are on file in the offices of the Municipality and shall govern in the event of any dispute. 2. As a condition of this agreement and without which this agreement shall have no effect, the Owner shall: a. execute and deliver this Agreement to the Municipality; b. obtain a consent to registration of this Agreement in a form satisfactory to the Municipality from the holder of any mortgage or other encumbrance of the Owner"s Lands that will be outstanding on the date of registration of the Plan; C. pay in full all outstanding taxes, drainage and unamortized Iocal improvement charges on the Owner's Lands; d. pay in full all outstanding invoices issued by the Municipality with respect to the Plan; e. deliver to the Municipality an original copy and an 8!/!? X 1 4? reduced copy of the final Plan forwarded to the County for registration; f. deliver to the County of Frontenac: I. eight (8) mylars and four (4) paper prints of the completed Plan; it. Four (4) copies of all reference plans and four (4) copies of all conveyance documents for all easement?s and lands being conveyed to the Municipality, if any; iii. A surveyor"s Certificate to confirm that the Iots and blocks on the Plan conform to the permitted minimum area requirements for each lot and the maximum density requirements in the Zoning By-Iaw of the Municipality; and IV. A digital file in AutoCAD format; g. provide certification from the Owner"s Professional Engineer that the facilities and services have been installed and are sufficient to ensure the independent operation of the Condominium Corporation. Alternatively, if any facilities or services have not been installed such that the Condominium Corporation can operate independently, then the Owner will be required to engage the services of a qualified quantity surveyor or professional engineer to provide a calculated amount of the required security for one hundred percent (1 00%) of the required works. The security shall be provided in a form satisfactory to the Municipality in its sole discretion and shall be in compliance with the Act. 3. The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this Agreement: Schedule "A" - Description of Lands Schedule"B" - Security Schedule ?C? - Plan of Condominium Drawings Schedule "D" - Grants of Easement and Other Public Lands Schedule "E" - Municipal Conditions 4. The Owner shall comply with any amendments, additions or deletions to the Plan of Condominium Drawings that the Municipality may reasonably require after the date of Page 193 of 231 3 this Agreement in order to better ensure the proper and orderly development of the Owner"s Lands. s. Without Iimiting the generality of the Owner's obligations set out in clause 1 of this Agreement, the Owner covenants and agrees that it shall comply with those municipal conditions set out in Schedule "E" to this Agreement. 6. The Owner shall deliver to the Municipality those deeds or grants of easement or right?sof-way set out on Schedule ?D?. 7. If required by the Municipality, the Owner shall employ an engineer Iicensed and in good standing with the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario to supervise all engineering functions including but not limited to: a. the preparation of calculations, contours, designs, plans and specifications; b. the preparation and furnishing of all required drawings; c. the preparation of the necessary contracts; d. the obtaining of all required federal, provincial and municipal approvals; e. the provision of the field layout, contract administration and construction supervision; f. the maintenance of all records of construction and upon completion to advise the Municipality of all construction changes and to prepare all final and ?as constructed? plans and drawings as may be required by the Municipality; and g. acting as the Owner's representative in all matters pertaining to the construction. 8. The Owner shall furnish all plans, specifications, designs, calculations, contours, or other information pertaining to the Owner's Lands as the Municipality may require. No contract shall be awarded and no work shall commence or be continued without the prior written approval of the design and inspection of the work by the Municipality. 9. All required inspections shall be performed by the Municipality whose determination of whether any work has been constructed to its satisfaction shall be final. 10. The Owner shall not transfer title to any Unit within the Plan until after this agreement, all deeds, grants of easement and O.3 metre reserves in favour of the Municipality and related reference plans of survey have been registered, as required. 11 .All civic addresses and 911 numbers for use within the Plan shall be allocated by the Municipality. The Owner shall advise each purchaser of a Unit of its correct number. '1 2.The Owner shall submit proposed lane names to the Municipality for approval. The naming and installation of civic addresses and Iane signs shall be in accordance with the Municipal Standards for 911 and Emergency Preparedness and at the Owner"s expense. The Iocation of all entrances to all Units, including the iocation of culverts and 911 civic address signage shall be shown on a plan approved by the Municipality prior to development. 13. The Owner covenants and agrees that nothing in this Agreement releases the Owner from the obligation to comply with the provisions of all other by-Iaws of the Municipality that may now or in future be in effect. 14. All construction within the Owner"s Lands shall be carried out in accordance with any Page 194 of 231 4 noise by-Iaw of the Municipality which may be in effect from time to time. 15. Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement and of any extension of time that may be agreed upon by the parties. 16. The Owner hereby grants to the Municipality, its servants and contractors, a ficence to enter the Owner's Lands during normal operating hours for the purpose ofinspecting the real property within the Plan of Condominium and to perform any work arising from or the result of any default by the Owner under this Agreement. 17. It is the intent of this Agreement that the Municipality shall notincur any expense for the development of the Owner"s Lands and every obligation of the Owner under this Agreement shall be deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owner?, unless specifically stated otherwise. 18. In the event the Owner is in default in the performance of any obligation under this Agreement and such default continues more than fifteen (1 5) days after the Municipality delivers written notice to the Owner requiring the Owner to remedy the default, the Municipality may, without further notice to the Owner, do such thing at the Municipality"s expense as it may reasonably require necessary to remedy the default, and the Municipality may recover the expense incurred in doing such thing by action or the same may be recovered in Iike manner as municipal taxes in accordance with the provisions of Section 446 of the Municipal Act, 2001, s.o., 2001, C. 25, as amended. 19. The Owner agrees to pay the legal, engineering, Iandscape architectural, planning and administrative costs incurred by the Municipality to process the Plan of Condominium, including but notlimited to, all legal, planning, engineering and inspection fees and the preparation and registration of all required agreements, transfers etc. 20. All invoices, costs and expenses received or incurred by the Municipality and payable by the Owner shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the Municipality's invoice or demand for payment to the Owner, failing which the Owner shall be in default under this Agreement and shall continue in default until payment plus all accrued interest is made in full. 21 . Interest shall be paid by the Owner on all overdue amounts at the same rate per annum and calculated in the same manner as the Municipality charges on overdue municipal taxes and any payments received shall be applied first on account of accumulated interest and then on the outstanding amount. 22.The Municipality shall undertake the registration, at the Owner"s expense, of this Agreement against the title to the Owner"s Lands and, in accordance with s. 51(26) of the Planning Act, all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement may be enforced against the Owner and any and all subsequent owners of the Owner"s Lands. 23.The Owner shall ensure that the requirements of this Agreement are brought to the attention of its contractors, employees and workers prior to the start of any construction. 24. All covenants in this Agreement shall be construed as being joint and several and that, when the context so requires or permits, the singular number shall be read as if the plural were expressed, and the masculine gender as if the feminine or neuter gender, as the case may be, were expressed. 25. Pursuant to s. 51(32) of the PlanningAct, the Draft Plan of Condominium Approval shall Iapse on December 3, 2017 if the final approval has not been given, notwithstanding the entering into of this Agreement, unless an extension is requested by the Owner and, subject to review, granted by the approval authority. Pursuant to s. 51(33) of the Pjannjng Act, the owner may submit a request to the approval authority for an extension Page 195 of 231 s of the Draft Plan of Condominium Approval. The extension period shall be for a maximum period of three (3) years and must be submitted prior to the lapsing of Draft Plan Condominium Approval. Further extensions may be considered at the discretion of the Municipality and the County of Frontenac. 26. Any dispute between the parties with respect to this Agreement shall, at the request of a party, be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Arbitrations Act 1991 and the decision of the arbitrator or, if more than one, the decision of a majority shall be final and binding on the parties. 27. Each party shall pay its own costs of the arbitration and shall share equally the costs of the arbitrator(s). 28.Any notice required to be given by the parties to this Agreement shall be given by registered mail at the last known address for service of the parties, or at such other addresses as the parties may specify from time to ti me, (provided that in the event of a postal disruption, notice shall only be given by hand) and shall be deemed to have been delivered on the third day after the date of deposit in the post office. 29.The Owner agrees that if any section, clause or provision of this Agreement is for any reason declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid the same shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than the section, clause, or provision so declared to be invalid and it is hereby declared to be the intention that all the remaining sections, clauses or provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, notwithstanding that one or more provisions thereof shall be declared to be invalid. 30. The parties shall, upon reasonable request of the other, execute any further document?s as may be required for the more perfect and absolute performance of the terms and conditions. 31 .The parties agree that upon registration of this Agreement the existing site plan control agreement registered on title to the Subject Lands shall be of no further force and effect and the Owner shall, at its expense, delete the site plan control agreement from title to the Plans. This Agreement shall be authority for the Municipality to consent to deletion from title of the said agreement. 32. In addition, the Owner and each and every subsequent owner of the Lands or a part thereof acknowledges notice of and agrees to be bound by all of the provisions of this agreement and, in particular, those provisions set out in Schedule ?E?. 33.This Agreement shall enure to and be binding upon the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have by the hands and seals executed this agreement as of the first date set out above. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC Ronald Vandewal - Mayor Page 196 of 231 6 Wayne Orr - CAO 1324789 0NTARIO INC. Name: Office: Name: Office: I/We have authority to bind the corporation MAGENTA WATERFORNT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Name: Office: Name: Office : I/We have authority to bind the corporation Page 197 of 231 7 SCHEDULE "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of Lots 20 and 21, Concession s, and part of the Road Allowance between Concessions 4 and s closed by By-law FC1 96575, geographic Township of Storrington, Township of South Frontenag County of Frontenac, being Paits 1- 40 inclusive, 42 - 44 inclusive, 48 and 49, on Plan 1 3R- 21240. Page 198 of 231 8 SCHEDULE "B" SECURITY Where, at the date of registration of this Agreement, not all facilities and services have been constructed in accordance with the approved drawings the owner agrees to post security in an amount equal to 1 00% of the certified estimate of the cost to construct all required facilities and services, such estimate to be to the satisfaction of the Municipality. Upon completion to the satisfact?ion of the Municipality of the works and facilities to be constructed in accordance with this agreement, if any, and upon receipt of the certificate of the consulting engineer required by clause 2(g) of this Agreement, the security or any balance thereof remaining shall be returned to the Owner. Page 199 of 231 9 SCHEDULE ?C? PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM DRAWINGS insert THE ORIGINAL PLANS ARE NOW ON FILE IN THE MUN?CIPAL OFFICES AND SHALL BE REFERRED TO IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISPUTE. Page 200 of 231 10 SCHEDULE "D" GRANTS OF EASEMENT AND OTHER PUBLIC LANDS The Owner shall convey to the Municipality in fee simple, free of any encumbrances, those lands described as Parts 50, 51, 52 and 53 on Plan 1 3R-2 1240 for purposes of a .3m reserve. Page 201 of 231 11 SCHEDULE "E" MUNICIPAL CONDIT?ONS The Owner further covenant?s and agrees as follows: 1. 2. In this Schedule "Plan" shall mean the Plan of Condominium, as finally approved. The drainage of surface water within the Plan is the sole responsibility of the Owner and all subsequent purchasers of Units, who shall provide and maintain adequate drainage of surface water in accordance with the Approved Plan of Condominium Drawings. 3. The Owner shall include in each agreement for the purchase and sale of any Unit, notice that the Purchaser will be bound by the following provisions which shall, without Iimiting the generality of the foregoing, also form part of this Agreement, binding on the Owner: (a) That every owner of a Unit shall be responsible for ensuring that all wastes are disposed of in compliance with the Municipality"s waste management by-Iaws and all other applicable Iaws. (b) The owners acknowledge receiving the following reports/Ietters and hereby agree to comply with the recommendations contained therein : (i) Environmental Impact Assessment, dated June 27, 2013 as amended by addenda, dated March 12, 201 4, May 21, 2014 prepared by Ecological Services; (ii) Hydrogeology, Terrain Analysis and Nitrate Impact Assessment Report, dated March 201 4, as amended by addendum dated May 2014 prepared by WESA Environmental; (iii) Stormwater Management Brief dated May 2014 prepared by WESA Environmental; (iv)Letter from the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to the County of Frontenac dated October 30, 201 4; (v) Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1-4) Report by Abacus Archaeological Services. (c)Owners are advised that the owner of each Unit is responsible for the maintenance and repair of all services contained within the individual Unit, which are owned by the individual Unit owner. (d) Owners acknowledge and agree that all vegetation with the exception of invasive species shall be retained and maintained in their natural state within 30 metres of the shoreline. Within this 30 metre buffer area, no structures shall be built and the area shall remain in its natural state with respect to soil and vegetation. (e)Owners acknowledge and agree that no development (including without Iimitation wells, structures, buildings or sewage disposal systems) shall be permitted within 40 m of the high water mark of Loughborough Lake and/or the edge of the Provincially Significant Wetland. (f)Owners acknowledge and agree that within the Provincially Significant Wetland there shall be no construction of any structures, including without limitation, docks, Page 202 of 231 12 Marine facilities and pathways and the shoreline shall not be altered in any way, subject only to removal of invasive species. (g)All owners acknowledge and agree that all wells and septic systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with all applicable laws, or decommissioned in accordance with all applicable laws. (h)All owners acknowledge and agree that soil conditions within the Plan require that any sewage system be installed in imported soil. Owners further acknowledge and agree that this requirement may result in the need to employ a pump depending on dwelling and sewage system elevations. (i) All owners acknowledge and agree that all watercourses on the Lands are subject to the ?Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation? (Ontario Regulation 148/06). The regulation requires that the Owner obtain the written approval of the Conservation Authority prior to any altering, straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way with the channel of the watercourse. (j)All owners acknowledge and agree that should deeply buried archaeological remains be found on the property during its development, that the Ministry of Tourism and Culture shall be notified immediately. The Owners further agree that any discovery of an aboriginal or archaeological artefact or resource is subject to controls under the Ontario Heritage Act and those archaeological resources shall not be removed without the approval of the Ministry of Tourism and Culture. In the event that any human remains are discovered, the owners agree to immediately contact the Ontario Provincial Police, the Ministry of Tourism and Culture, the Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the Cemeteries Regulation Unit of the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations ((4 16) 326-8404) and the Municipality. (k) All owners agree that if during the process of development any archaeological resources or human remains of aboriginal origins are encountered, the Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office will be contacted immediately at: Algonquins of Ontario Consultation Office 31 Riverside Drive, Suite 101 Pembroke, Ontario K8A 8R6 Tel. 613-735-3759 fax 613-735-6307 e-mail: algonquins@nrtco.net 4. The Owner shall provide to every purchaser of any Unit a site servicing plan showing the Iocation of the house, well, primary and alternate sewage Iocations for the Unit. s. TheowneracknowledgestheletterdatedAugust20,20l4fromKFL&APublicHealth and agrees that the recommendations contained therein shall be implemented. 6. The identified primary and alternate sewage system locations shall be reserved and maintained solely for that purpose. No construction of wells, homes, driveways, pools, garages or any other structure is to take place in the primary or alternate sewage system location. 7. The primary and alternate sewage disposal locations were selected due to the suitability of those areas to provide an ideal area to treat sewage. No deviation will be permitted in the sewage disposal system locations unless, if it becomes necessary to deviate from the approved Iocation, an engineering report and system design as well as a terrain analysis is provided to the satisfaction of the approval authority. The alternative Iocation must also include an impact assessment on adjoining properties. Page 203 of 231 13 8. Sewage disposal systems which produce a higher quality of effluent will be considered and encouraged by the approval authority in situations where protection of human health or the quality of surface water or groundwater is an issue. 9. The Owner covenants and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Municipality against any action or claim for any damages, Iosses or expenses resulting from loss of Iife or injury to any person or Ioss or damage to any property to the extent that it is attributable to the inability to operate an emergency vehicle properly or safely in order to access or exit any given unit due in whole or in part to the condition of the roads or driveways within the Plan at the time. 10. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the Municipality will not be assuming or maintaining the roads within the Plan and will have no obligation to undertake any works to improve, widen or upgrade the aforesaid roads at public expense at any time. The operation and maintenance of all roads and driveways within the Plan are the sole cost and responsibility of the Owner. 11. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the Municipality shall not be responsible for providing fire, ambulance and other emergency services to any unit if the operator of the emergency vehicle, having made reasonable efforts in the circumstances, determines that the condition of the roads or driveways as constructed or maintained at the time, prevents the vehicle from being operated properly or safely in order to access or exit any given unit. 12. The Owner agrees to upgrade Keir Road to the satisfaction of the Township from the entrance of the Plan to Duff Road (a distance of approximately 639 m). The parties agree that the timing of the work and the Owner's proportionate share of the required upgrades shall be determined by the Municipality acting reasonably. 13. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the Municipality shall not provide curbside waste disposal services to any unit within the Plan. Waste pickup will be available at the Township Road. 14. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that any development or redevelopment is subject to Iand use planning controls and Ontario Building Code permits and approvals, intended to, among other things, conserve shorelines and woodland areas in their natural state. 15. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that every owner of a Unit shall be responsible for operation and maintenance of their water system in accordance with all applicable Iaws. 16. It is the responsibility of the Owner and each subsequent owner of a Unit within the Plan of Condominium to make whatever arrangements with Hydro One and such other utility provider as are necessary for the installation of hydro-electrig telephone and other utility services for the Unit. 17. The Ovvner shall confirm that sufficient wire-Iine communication/telecommunication service to the proposed development exists. In the event that such infrastructure is not available, the Owner is hereby advised that the Owner may be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. If the Owner is required to demonstrate to the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication facilities are available within the proposed development, such facilities must be sufficient to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e. 911 Emergency Services). Page 204 of 231 14 18. The Owner shall endeavour to maintain all existing grades along the edge of the boundary of the Plan. 19. The Owner shall ensure that, prior to commencement of construction, the Owner shall have an erosion and sediment control plan prepared by professional engineer in accordance with current best management practices. The erosion and sediment control plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and the erosion and sediment control plan shall be implemented and monitored throughout construction to ensure that the plan is complied with. 20. The Owner shall construct, operate and maintain the stormwater management system in accordance with all approved drawings, the approved stormwater management report and government authority approvals, including without limitation the following reports: (a) Servicing and Stormwater Management Design Brief prepared by Ainley Group dated June 17, 201 5; (b) Grading and Stormwater Management Plan North, Drawing C200 prepared by Ainley Group dated August 18, 2015 ; (c) Grading and Stormwater Management Plan South, Drawing C201 prepared by Ainley Group dated August 18, 201 5; and (d) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Drawing C202 prepared by Ainley Group dated August 18, 2015. 21 . The Owner hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Municipality against all actions, causes of action, suits, claims, demands and costs whatsoever arising by reason of any matter under this Agreement, including without Iimitation any actions, causes of action, suits, claims, demands or costs directly or indirectly related to the construction, use, operation or maintenance of the roads within the Plan. 22. The Owner agrees that all existing Iots outside of the Plan which access Applewood Lane shall continue to have Iegal access to Applewood Lane, which shall be formalized by easement and contained within a joint use and maintenance agreement between the Owner and the owners of all adjacent lots. A joint use and maintenance agreement for access shall be registered on title between the Condominium Corporation and the owners of all other properties with access to Applewood Lane and Juniper Lane. The joint use and maintenance agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the Municipality and shall be established prior to registration of the Plan. 23. AccesstoUnit21shallbeobtainedonlybywayofprivaterightofwayoverpart45 on Plan 1 3R-2 1240, which right of way shall be established to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 24. Accesstolandsownedby10736500ntarioInc.,comprisingallofPlN36291-0501, shall be created in the Declaration for the Condominium over Parts 12- 17, 28, 34, 40, 42 and 43, Plan 1 3R-21240 to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 25. The Ovvner shall install a garbage collection facility at the entrance to the development at Keir Road on Part 32, Plan 1 3R-2 1240 or another location satisfactory to the Municipality and to a standard satisfactory to the Municipality within six (6) months of registration of the Plan. 26. TheOwnershallinstallaCanadaPostBoxonPart33,Planl3R-2l240nearthe entrance to the development at Keir Road within six (6) months of registration of the Plan. Any modification of this Iocation is subject to the requirements of Canada Post Page 205 of 231 15 and shall be to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 27. TheOwnershallinstallstreetlightingtotheMunicipality'ssatisfactiontoilluminate the Canada Post-Boxes, garbage collection area within six (6) months of registration of the Plan. 28. The Owner shall install signage at the high water mark/boundary of the Provincially Significant Wetland on all interior Iots fronting onto the Provincially Significant Wetland that clearly identify the edge of the wetland. The signage shall be installed at Iocations and shall contain content approved by the Municipality and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority. 29. The Owner agrees to provide cash in Iieu of parkland to the Municipality in an amount satisfactory to the Municipality in accordance with the Planning Act. 30. FollowingregistrationofthePlanofCondominium,Part4lPlanl3R-21240shall remain as a remnant parcel and the Owner shall convey Part 41, Plan 1 3R-2 1240 to the owner of PIN 36291-0501 and the title to both parcels shall be held in the same name so that the parcels merge in title. Page 206 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2016-16 BEING A BY-LAW TO ASSUME AS COMMON AND PUBLIC HIGHWAY CERTAIN LANDS IN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, PURSUANT TO SECTION 31(6) OF THE MUNICIPAL ACT, 2001. WHEREAS certain lands in the Township of South Frontenac were deeded to the Township of South Frontenac as a condition of consent, for the purpose of dedicating them to public use as common and public highways; AND WHEREAS Council wishes to enact a by-law for the purpose of assuming the lands as part of the public highways to be maintained by the municipality; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: Those lands herein described are hereby established and assumed as common and public highways. 1. Those lands described as Parts 2 to 8 inclusive on Plan 13R- 16242, Concession X, Part of Lot 12, Storrington District, Township of South of Frontenac , municipally known as Ramparts Road This by-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of registration of this by-law. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 1st day of March, 2016. Read a first and second time this 1st day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this 1st day of March, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ________________________________ Ron Vandewal, Mayor ____________________________ Wayne Orr, Clerk Page 207 of 231 Report from Deputy Mayor Sutherland Re: Observations from FCM Sustainable Communities Conference - February 9-11, 2016 As part of the FCM Sustainable Communities Conference I attended a day long workshop on complete streets in Action: Sustainable Streets for All Road Users. The day was run by Mobycon, a Dutch consulting firm, and included a tour of complete road initiatives in Ottawa. The following are some aspects of the day that particularly attracted my interest. 18-25% of the average household budget is spent on mobility, more than food and often more than housing. How does our spatial design facilitate independence, participation and safety? There are now more bikes than cars crossing the Thames River in London. At a speed of 30k/hr 85% of people in traffic accidents will walk away, at 50k/hour 85% will suffer serious injury or fatality. In the Netherlands, with a population of 70 million there are 500 traffic fatalities a year and in Canada with a population of 35 million there are 2,200. Holland had this rate of fatalities in the late 1960’s and declared it a health emergency and has initiated Vision Zero and has seen a steady decline in fatalities the current 500. The goal is that everyone has the right to return home from a road trip. Form follows function, in other words is you want speeds to be reduced, design roads for that speed or lower, do not make it possible to drive faster, otherwise people will. At 30k/hour streets considered safe for all users, but for car drivers they cannot be expected to drive for 30 for more than a few kilometers, so need to create safe low speed zones connected with higher speed routes. Design roads for their 24 hour use, rather then he 15 minutes congestion. Some thoughts from the day: South Frontenac needs a master plan; we have no vision of where we are going or why. How do we imagine South Frontenac as a community? We are an outdoor, active community, how do we maximize that experience for our residents and how do we celebrate it? Other sessions Visit to Chelsea new water and sewage system Initially to service 100 homes most of which had failed septic tanks and were being forced to move to holding tanks. Geographic distance from plant to homes 3 kilometers. Doing both at the same time. Water plant and sewage system modular. Inground infrastructure sized to handle 3000 homes which the plant will slowly expand to accommodate as users connect. Some other streets in area have already asked to be hooked to system. System partially financed by developers who gained intensity zoning for some new developments. Rural area. Water produced at about 17 cents per m3. Comments from other sessions Easy gains or initiatives in other rural communities – all buildings to LED lighting, pilot an electric car purchase to fleet and charging station. Electric car costs 3.10 per 100 kilometers with no emissions, cars 8.69 per 100 kilometers. With many commercially viable plug-in hybrids and electric car options this is now possible. There is a new provincial electric car incentive program of up to $10,000. 30-40% energy efficiency gains possible in retro-fits of old building stock. Start to see natural environment as a key component of our infrastructure. Page 208 of 231 STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council: February 24th, 2016 Agenda Date: March 1st, 2016 SUBJECT: Infrastructure funding announcement RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. BACKGROUND: At the Rural Ontario Municipal Association – Ontario Good Roads Association Combined Conference last week, Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Premier of Ontario, announced that the Province would triple its funding under the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) by 2018-19. Currently the Township receives 109,279 as base formula funding under the OCIF and has not been successful in obtaining funding through the province’s grant application process. Currently base funding must be used in the year it is received but the announcement speaks to allowing the accumulation of the fund for a period of 5 years to allow funding for larger projects. The fund can be used on roads, bridges, water and wastewater projects. Up to 90% of the project costs may be requested for funding through the application process to a maximum of $2 million. In the announcement, the formula based funding component is expected to double in 2017 from $50 million to $100 million and ultimately to $200 million by 2019. In estimating a $50 million progression in 2018 and 2019 and assuming that the current criteria used to calculate formula base funding remain unchanged, the following would be the expected progression in OCIF funding for the Township. 2016 109,219 2017 218,438 2018 327,657 2019 436,876 Under the application funding, $50 million is currently allocated and is expected to increase to $100 million by 2019. It was further stated that the application process would be streamlines to better reward good asset management by municipalities. Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD NOTICE Page 209 of 231 The Ontario Energy Board is holding a hearing to consider what mechanisms may be used to recover the costs of expanding natural gas service to Ontario communities that are currently not served. Learn more. Have your say. The Ontario Energy Board is commencing a hearing on its own motion to consider what mechanisms may be used to recover the costs of expanding natural gas service to Ontario communities that do not currently have access to natural gas. In July 2015, Union Gas Limited filed an application (EB-2015-0179) to expand natural gas service to certain rural and remote communities. That application included a proposal to have existing Union Gas Limited customers pay a portion of the costs to connect new customers. The Ontario Energy Board has determined that the requests made by Union Gas Limited in that application raise issues that may be common to any entity that wishes to provide natural gas service to communities that do not currently have access to natural gas service. The Ontario Energy Board will therefore address these issues through a generic proceeding. The Ontario Energy Board will put the hearing of Union Gas Limited’s application (EB-2015-0179) on hold until the generic hearing is complete. In the generic proceeding, the Ontario Energy Board will consider possible alternative ratemaking frameworks to provide natural gas service to Ontario communities that do not currently have access to natural gas. The OEB plans to seek input from intervenors on exactly what the issues should be. However, broadly speaking the OEB intends to review the following issues: 1. Should the OEB implement new ratemaking mechanisms including changes to current economic tests to encourage utilities to expand natural gas distribution service to new communities? If so, what should these new mechanisms be? 2. Should the OEB consider imposing conditions or making other changes to Municipal Franchise Agreements and Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity to reduce barriers to natural gas expansion? 3. Does the OEB have the authority to require the ratepayers of one utility to subsidize the costs of another utility to expand into new communities? If so, under what circumstances (if any) would this be appropriate? To see the detailed draft issues list, please select the file number EB-2016-0004 on the OEB website: www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/notice THE ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD IS HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING The Ontario Energy Board (OEB) will hold a public hearing to consider the kind of cost recovery mechanisms that may be appropriate for rural and remote community expansion projects in Ontario. We will hear arguments from parties involved in the process and will decide what, if any, new mechanisms are appropriate. The OEB will adopt into the record of this proceeding, all evidence filed in EB-2015-0179 that is relevant to the issues to be determined for the generic hearing. The OEB will provide an opportunity for the filing of further evidence in subsequent procedural orders. The OEB will deem the intervenors in the EB-2015-0179 case to be intervenors in this generic hearing and grants to any such intervenors the same cost eligibility status as was granted in EB-2015-0179. The OEB is an independent and impartial public agency. We make decisions that serve the public interest. Our goal is to promote a financially viable and efficient energy sector that provides you with reliable energy services at a reasonable cost. BE INFORMED AND HAVE YOUR SAY You have the right to information regarding this application and to be involved in the process. • You can review this Notice and related documents on the OEB’s website now. • You can sign up to observe the proceeding by receiving OEB documents related to the hearing. • You can file a letter with your comments which will be considered during the hearing. • You can become an active participant (called an intervenor). Apply by February 22, 2016 or the hearing will go ahead without you and you will not receive any further notice of the proceeding. • At the end of the process, you can review the OEB’s decision and its reasons on our website. LEARN MORE Our file number for this case is EB-2016-0004. To learn more about this hearing, find instructions on how to file letters or become an intervenor, or to access any document related to this case (including the draft issues list), please select the file number EB-2016-0004 from the list on the OEB website at www.ontarioenergyboard.ca/notice. You can also phone our Consumer Relations Centre at 1-877-632-2727 with any questions. ORAL HEARING The OEB intends to proceed with an oral hearing for this case. PRIVACY If you write a letter of comment, your name and the content of your letter will be put on the public record and the OEB website. However, your personal telephone number, home address and email address will be removed. If you are a business, all your information will remain public. If you apply to become an intervenor, all information will be public. This hearing will be held under sections 19 and 36 of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998. Ontario Energy Commission de l’énergie Board de l’Ontario Page 210 of 231 Draft Issues List EB-2016-0004 1. Does the OEB have the legal authority to establish a framework whereby the customers of one utility subsidize the expansion undertaken by another distributor into communities that do not have natural gas service? 2. Based on a premise that the OEB has the legal authority described in Issue #1, what are the merits of this approach? How should these contributions be treated for ratemaking purposes? 3. Should the OEB consider exemptions or changes to the EBO 188 guidelines for rural and remote community expansion projects? o Should the OEB consider projects that have a portfolio profitability index (PI) less than 1.0 and individual projects within a portfolio that have a PI lower than 0.8? o What costs should be included in the economic assessment for providing natural gas service to communities and how are they to be determined and calculated. o What, if any, amendments to the EBO 188 Guidelines would be required as a result of the inclusion of any costs identified above? o What would be the criteria for the projects/communities that would be eligible for such exemptions? What, if any, other public interest factors should be included as part of this criteria? How are they to be determined? 4. Should the OEB allow existing natural gas distributors to establish surcharges from customers of new communities to improve the feasibility of potential community expansion projects? If so, what approaches are appropriate and over what period of time? 5. Are there other ratemaking or rate recovery approaches that the OEB should consider? 6. Should the OEB allow for the recovery of the revenue requirement associated with community expansion costs in rates that are outside the OEB approved incentive ratemaking framework prior to the end of any incentive regulation plan term once the assets are used and useful? Ontario Energy Board EB-2016-0004 Page 211 of 231 7. Should the OEB consider imposing conditions or making other changes to Municipal Franchise Agreements and Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity to reduce barriers to natural gas expansion? 8. What types of processes could be implemented to facilitate the introduction of new entrants to provide service to communities that do not have access to natural gas. What are the merits of these processes and what are the existing barriers to implementation? (e.g. Issuance of Request for Proposals to enter into franchise agreements) 2 Page 212 of 231 Ministry of Agriculture, Ministere de I'Agriculture, de Food and Rural Affairs I'Alimentation et des Affaires rurales Office of the Minister Bureau du ministre th ^ e 77 GrenviHe Street, 1 F Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 1B3 77, rue Grenville, 11 6tage Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1B3 Tel: 416-326-3074 Tel.: 416-326-3074 Telec.: 416-326-3083 Fax:416-326-3083 Tfh OmEario February 2, 2016 Dear Mayor: I am pleased to share news with you regarding the 2016 Premier's Award forAgri-Food Innovation Excellence program. I encourage you to share this information throughout your municipality. The Premier's Award for Agri-Food Innovation Excellence program was created to recognize and foster the spirit of innovation that thrives in Ontario's agricultural sector. It encourages the development of rural communities, farms, agri-food processors and agri-food organizations by adding value to existing products, creating jobs and driving economic growth. Each year the program recognizes up to 45 award winning innovations across the province and awards them with $5,000 each. In addition, there is a Premier's Award valued at $75,000, a Minister's Award valued at $50,000, and three Leaders in Innovation awards valued at $25,000 each. All award recipients receive a plaque and gate sign, and they can also use the Premier's Award program wordmark. Primary pj-oducers, processors and agri-food organizations are invited to submit applications between February 12, 2016, and April 15, 2016. Details on eligibility, innovation categories, assessment criteria, and the application and selection process can be found in the enclosed 2016 Program Guidebook and Application Form or at www.ontario.ca/agrifoodinnovation. I ask that you encourage outstanding agriculture and agri-food innovators throughout your municipality to apply. The deadline to submit applications is 5 p.m. on April 15, 2016. Should you require additional information please contact the Agricultural Information Contact Centre at 1-877-424-1300 or email ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca. have also enclosed a copy of last year's program brochure which highlights 2015 Premier's Award forAgri-Food Innovation Excellence recipients. ...12 Ministry Headquarters: 1 Stone Road West, Guelph, Ontario N1G 4Y2 Bureau principal du ministers: Stone Road West, Guelph (Ontario) N1 G 4Y2 -2- look forward to learning about agri-food innovations in your municipality. Sincerely, JeffLeal Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Enclosure Good Things Grow in Ontario A bonne terre, bons produits ^r T s Page 213 of 231 Page 214 of 231 February 10th, 2016 Hon. Jeff Leal Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 11th Floor 77 Grenville Street Toronto, ON M7A 1B3 We were very disappointed with the rejection of our two recent applications for infrastructure funding and, as you can see from the attached motion, our Council is asking that use of the current scoring indicators be discontinued. Municipalities that have significant debt and few reserves have not planned to maintain their infrastructure. Awarding a high score to a municipality with a low net financial asset per household just encourages continued poor planning. Also, we note that the scoring indicators for a municipality are not likely to change anytime soon meaning that the same municipalities will continue to score well and qualify repeatedly for funding. By copy of this letter, we ask other municipalities and groups to support our request that all future infrastructure funding be distributed to all municipalities utilizing a fair and equitable formula. Yours truly Louis Antonakos, Mayor 613-257-6206 lantonakos@sympatico.ca info@carletonplace.ca [Type text] Page 215 of 231 Page 216 of 231 News Release Province Seeking Public Feedback on its Strategy for a Safer Ontario February 12, 2016 Ontario to Modernize the Delivery of Community Safety Ontario is launching public consultations across the province on the development of its Strategy for a Safer Ontario - a new blueprint for effective, sustainable, and community-based policing. The nature of policing and the role of police officers have changed since the Police Services Act was written in 1990. Policing has evolved as a result of advancements in technology, the increasing frequency of police interactions with vulnerable individuals, such as those suffering with mental health or addiction issues, and Ontarians' enhanced expectations about oversight and accountability of law enforcement. The new Strategy for a Safer Ontario will include updating the Police Services Act. Consultations will seek input on how to: • Promote collaborative partnerships between police, the public and other sectors such as education, health care and social services, to ensure that those in need of help receive the right response, at the right time, and by the right service provider • Improve interactions between police and vulnerable Ontarians, including enhancing frontline responses to those in crisis • Clarify police duties, modernize training programs and deliver services using a range of public safety personnel • Enhance accountability and strengthen civilian governance of police services boards as well as ensure police oversight bodies are effective and have clear mandates In addition, Ontario will also be developing a framework for First Nations policing to ensure equitable and culturally responsive policing for the province's First Nations communities. The province encourages all Ontarians to help transform policing by participating in public consultations beginning on February 18, 2016 or by providing feedback through an online survey. Supporting safe, healthy communities is part of the government's plan to build Ontario up and deliver on its number-one priority to grow the economy and create jobs. The four-part plan includes investing in people's talents and skills, making the largest investment in public infrastructure in Ontario's history, creating a dynamic, innovative environment where business thrives, and building a secure retirement savings plan. QUICK FACTS • Public meetings will be held in Cobourg, London, Newmarket, Hamilton, Thunder Bay, Ottawa, Sault Ste. Marie, and Toronto. • Police services in the province are governed by the Police Services Act, which has not been Page 217 of 231 substantially updated since 1990. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Read Minister Naqvi’s August 2015 speech to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) on the strategy. QUOTES "Our new Strategy for a Safer Ontario is about finding smarter, better ways to build even safer communities. It will build a policing model for the 21st century by rewriting the Police Services Act – representing the biggest transformation of policing in Ontario in 25 years. We look forward to hearing directly from local communities as we move forward on our new framework to build an even stronger, safer Ontario." — Yasir Naqvi, Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services CONTACTS Lauren Callighen Minister’s Office 416-325-5982 Courtney Battistone Communications Branch 416-325-0432 Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services http://www.ontario.ca/safety Page 218 of 231 From: Ross Sutherland [mailto:7846elbe@gmail.com] Sent: February-17-16 5:06 PM To: Wayne Orr Subject: Addition to Council Correspondence Hi Wayne, I would like to have the following article from the Buck Lake Association newsletter added to the agenda. I have cleared its distribution with the author. I will also be asking Council to support circulating this information to the lake Association list with a note that their members might find this information from Buck lake useful in helping their residents efforts to reduce carbon emissions and help protect the environment. Update Notes on Outboard motor emissions Some good things do come of modern progress and even from our government. As an update to part of the Lake Plan published a few years back, now it should be noted that in regards to outboard motors, modern two strokes of some manufacturers are not the polluters they were in the past. High pressure direct inject technologies used in the Envinrude line and some of the Tohatsu line meet even the most stringent of pollution regulations of the California air quality agency, CARB, (namely the 3 Star ultra low emissions rating). Four stoke engines have been, and continue to be, low emission engines. The Canadian government passed legislation in 2011 to work in conjunction with the US EPA so that all motors imported or manufactured in Canada meet emission standards that are not unlike what we know of for our automobiles in Ontario ie regulating the output of Nitrous Oxides, Carbon Monoxides and other emissions. The emissions regulations are evolving and are more stringent for subsequent production years, but the take away is that anyone who is considering the retirement of their ¨old smoker¨ can be confident that any outboard purchased in Canada since production year 2012 is the cleanest that is available. For engines under 15 hp it should be noted that the Lehr propane outboards are a very good option with low emissions and represent new forward enviro thinking, and of course there are electric options such as the Elco line of marine engines. Also, the somewhat obvious should be mentioned, that less is better - the reguations are basically structured to control how much of these pollutants are released per kilowatt of power produced by the motor. Consequently the smaller the engine you can employ to enjoy your boating experience, the better, and as well, the less it is used. I suppose one could say that the more we paddle, row, sail or swim the better for the environment and probably us as well. Current Canadian legislation governing marine engine emissions http://laws-lois.justice.gc. The specific NOx and CO emmission limits https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/1045.103 USA EPA governing regulations for marine engines http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ California Air Resource Board - CARB marine engine Star rating (note that the direct inject manufacturers quoted in the three star category are not current representatives of manufacturers in actual production - it should be Envinrude, Tohatsu, and some Mercury) http://www.marineenginedigest. Dave Frid - Friends of the Lake cbdavefrid@gmail.com for comments or questions Page 219 of 231 In response to the committee of the whole meeting item 6a Feb 9th, 2016 Dear Lindsay Mills It is with great disappointment that we received a copy of the agenda regarding the committee of the whole meeting from Feb 9th. In particular your comments listed under item 6a. Our family has owned the property at 10 Hickory Lane for over 50 years and we have been using it for all this time. My 80 yr old mother who is the current owner is no longer in a financial or physical position to maintain it, and approached us 1 1/2 yrs ago about buying it. At that point in time we reached out to you and Brian Grass. We expressed our desire to do everything above board and arranged a meeting with both of you at the cottage. We agreed that we would keep the current footprint, but would be allowed to have enclosed stairs on the exterior of the building. You also advised us that we would be permitted to change the roofline and go from a flat roof to a pitched roof. We decided to keep the flat roof but reinforce it and enclose it with a railing, so we could enjoy the views. You agreed with this. We sent you a preliminary drawing and requested that you confirm in writing what we had discussed. We never heard back from you. We followed up with phone messages and another meeting at your office. All were reaffirming what we discussed. The cost to complete the renovation while still at the end of the day only having a cottage less than 1000 sq ft was exorbitant. Despite this fact, we would have proceeded, but you would not put your words to us in writing. The costs to have architectural drawings submitted for permit was in the thousands, let alone the costs to renovate our small structure. We asked the opinion of a well regarded local structural engineer. He visited the site and deemed that over the years the foundation had shifted sufficiently to be structurally unsafe. After speaking with a planner and a lawyer, we were made aware of 5.11 in the zoning bylaw. The law states that if a legal non conforming structure is deemed to be unsafe by an authorized professional, it may be rebuilt on its current footprint in its current location. Given the costs involved in the renovation, and no cooperation from you in giving us written permission to renovate as discussed, we thought you may be able to help us proceed with this approach. Page 220 of 231 Once again, we wanted to be open and above board. Your shocking response was that irrespective of what 5.11 said, the municipality would not issue us a permit to rebuild as the legal department didn’t endorse section 5.11. I struggle to understand this, as 5.11 of the zoning bylaw is in fact a legal document endorsed by your municipality. I wondered if it was in fact you alone that didn’t endorse it. I honestly don’t know why anyone would attempt to go through all the right channels when the outcomes are so deeply disappointing. Instead of receiving assistance from you in our efforts to maximize our enjoyment from our family cottage, we find out from a South Frontenac neighbour that you are trying to have the wording in the zoning bylaw changed to prevent us from proceeding. We are doing everything above board, only to find out that you are going behind our backs on this. I am attaching an article from the Canadian Justice Review Board, that reviews and rules on a very similar case to ours. I think it is worth reading. The only thing we want to do, is to continue to enjoy our family cottage on Loughborough Lake. The last few years this has been very difficult as the walls now have holes in them and the roof has had major leaks as you are aware. We also worry about the cinder block foundation. We ask that you honour zoning bylaw 5.11 as it currently reads and allow us to rebuild in the existing footprint, so that we may again have a safe and enjoyable cottage. Kind regards but deeply disappointed Robin Walker and Joanna Stricker ISSN 1181-9006 Page 221 of 231 The Digest of MUNICIPAL & PLANNING LAW Editor in Chief: John Mascarin, M.A., LL.B. Aird & Berlis LLP Cited 4 D.M.P.L. (2d) Published 12 times per year by CARSWELL, A DIVISION OF THOMSON REUTERS CANADA LIMITED One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy Road Toronto, Ontario M1T 3V4 (2010) 4 D.M.P.L. (2d), January 2010, Issue 13 Production Editor: Tara Russell Subscription Rate is $480 for 12 issues per annum © 2009 Thomson Reuters Canada Limited Printed in Canada by Thomson Reuters. Customer Relations Toronto 1-416-609-3800 Elsewhere in Canada/U.S. 1-800-387-5164 Fax 416-298-5082 www.carswell.com E-mail www.carswell.com/email THE EVOLUTION OF LEGAL NON-CONFORMING RIGHTS by Michael Polowin and Elad Gafni Introduction Many, if not most, municipalities across Ontario have provisions in their zoning by-laws that purport to limit repair, renovation or use of buildings that are non-conforming as to use or non-complying as to performance standards. The intent and effect of these by-laws are to “encourage” property owners to bring non-conformity or non-compliance to an end. Two recent decisions, TDL Group Corp. v. Ottawa (City), 2009 CarswellOnt 7336 (O.M.B.), striking out a portion of the City of Ottawa’s zoning by-law regarding non-conforming rights, and Ottawa (City) v. TDL Group Corp., 2009 CarswellOnt 7168 (Ont. Div. Ct.), which denied the City of Ottawa’s leave to appeal of an order of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB or Board), signifies a clear and unambiguous ruling that municipalities may not limit or coercively bring to an end non-conforming or non-complying rights beyond the narrow constraints permitted by the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 and at common law. Background In 2001, the new City of Ottawa (the City) was created by the amalgamation of the Region of Ottawa-Carleton and 11 local municipalities. On June 25, 2008, following approximately five years of public consultation, the City enacted Comprehensive Zoning By-Law 2008-250 (“CZBL”). The CZBL harmonized the existing 36 zoning by-laws from the former municipalities comprising the new City, into a single zoning by-law, and was designed to implement the new Offi- cial Plan of the City, which was adopted on May 14, 2003 and amended in July 2005. Over seventy appeals regarding the enactment of the CZBL were received by the Ontario Municipal Board. One of these appeals was brought by The TDL Group Corp. (“TDL”) to challenge the validity of section 3 of the CZBL which con­ cerned non-conformity and non-compliance. TDL alleged that section 3 of the CZBL was contrary to section 34(9)(a) of the Planning Act and was outside the City’s authority. Legislation Section 34(9)(a) of the Planning Act creates an exemption to the scope of zoning by-laws that municipalities may enact. The effect of section 34(9)(a) is to establish legal non-conforming uses which are lawful violations of current zoning by virtue of the fact that the use of the land or structure ex­ isted in compliance with applicable by-laws before the by­ laws with which there is non-compliance was passed. Sec­ tion 34(9)(a) provides: 34. (9) No by-law passed under this section applies, (a) to prevent the use of any land, building or structure for any purpose prohibited by the by-law if such land, building or structure was lawfully used for such purpose on the day of the pass­ ing of the by-law, so long as it continues to be used for that purpose; The impugned section 3 of the CZBL reads, in part, as follows: 3. (1) Nothing in this section affects subsection 34(9) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Excepted Lands and Buildings, which addresses non-conforming uses. Page 222 of 231 4 D.M.P.L. (2d), January 2010 2 (2) No person will repair or rebuild any part of any building housing or otherwise used in connection with a non-conforming use, except as set out in subsection (3). (3) When a building, structure, facility or otherwise, including septic and other servicing systems, used in connection with a non-con­ forming use is damaged or demolished, the non-conforming right is not extinguished if: (By-law 2008-462) (a) the damage or demolition was involuntary; (b) the building is repaired or re-occupied before the expiry of two years; and (c) the building continues to be used for the same purpose after it is repaired as it was used before it was damaged or demolished. (4) Non-conforming rights are extinguished: (a) where the damage, demolition or removal of a building is not involuntary; (b) where a damaged building is not repaired or re-occupied before the expiry of two years; or (c) where the non-conforming use, (i) is abandoned, or (ii) is changed without permission from the Committee of Adjustment. (5) This section applies, with all necessary modification, to a non­ complying building. . . . [Emphasis added] Ontario Municipal Board Decision The position of TDL before the Board was that section 3 of the CZBL unlawfully attempted to narrow, amend and re­ strict the non-conforming rights of property owners beyond the jurisdiction of the City pursuant to the Planning Act. Spe­ cifically, TDL took issue with the fact that subsections 3(3) and (4) of the CZBL purported to extinguish property own­ ers’ legal non-conforming rights where “damage, demolition or removal of a building is not involuntary”, as contrasted to circumstances where repair or rebuilding is done as a result of “involuntary” damage, demolition or removal (i.e. causes beyond the control of the owner). TDL referred the Board to numerous cases standing for the proposition that as long as the intention of an owner is to continue a long-established pattern of usage, then there can be no loss of a non-conforming use as a result of damage or demolition, whether it was voluntary or non-voluntary. Moreover, TDL took the position that the decision of the Su­ preme Court of Canada in Saint-Romuald (Ville) c. Olivier (2001), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 898, 22 M.P.L.R. (3d) 1, 2001 Car­ swellQue 2013, 2001 CarswellQue 2014, [2001] S.C.J. No. 54, REJB 2001-25834, 2001 SCC 57, 204 D.L.R. (4th) 284, 275 N.R. 1 (S.C.C.) stood for the proposition that non-con­ forming and non-complying uses are not fixed, but can evolve over time, provided that the impact on the surround­ ing neighbourhood was minimal. As Binnie J. held, “[u]nder the doctrine of “acquired rights”, the respondents were not only entitled to continue to use the premises as they were when the new by-law was passed, but was given some flexi­ bility in the operation of that use”, including the right to “normal evolution” and to “adapt to the demands of the mar­ ket or the technology that are relevant to it” (para. 19). Sec­ tion 3 of the CZBL unlawfully frustrated this right to the “normal evolution” of non-conforming uses by prohibiting activities such as the installation of energy-saving windows or the repair of a decrepit roof because such renovations would run afoul of the prohibition on voluntary damage, demolition or removal contained in subsections 3(3) and (4). In contrast, the City argued that section 3 was an appropriate vehicle to encourage or “cause” the “evolution” of land use over time from “a legal non-conforming use to one in con­ formity with the zoning by-law” (pages 8-9). In oral evi­ dence before the Board, the City’s land use planner con­ firmed that the effect of section 3 of the CZBL was that “if a property owner repairs or rebuilds voluntarily, to maintain, upgrade or modernize the building, the non-conforming or non-complying right is lost” (page 3). In fact, according to the City’s planner, the City’s intent [of section 3 was] to gradually phase out existing legal non-conforming uses (page 3). The OMB rejected the City’s argument in this regard and de­ termined as follows at page 10: [O]n a clear reading of section 34(9)(a) of the Act . . . such a munici­ pal intent and effect of a zoning by-law is not permitted by the Act. [. . .] The cases cited by the Appellant, especially the decisions of the Su­ preme Court of Canada, Central Jewish Institute v. City of Toronto and Saint-Romuald (City) v. Olivier affirm the right of a landowner to continue with a legal non-conforming use. In fact, the Supreme Court of Canada decisions stand for the proposition that such a use may be expanded within the confines of the building, may be intensified as part of the pre-existing activity, and finally, of particular relevance to the case at hand, may see “renewal and change” (Saint-Romuald (City) v. Olivier). The Board finds that section 3 of the CZBL specifically operates to prohibit such “renewal and change”. [Emphasis in original] The City also argued that voluntary cessation of use, includ­ ing for voluntary repair or replacement of elements of the building, brings legal non-conforming and non-complying uses to an end, and that such will not be the case only if such cessation is beyond the control of the property owner. How­ ever, once again, the Board disagreed, holding that the inten­ tion of the property owner was paramount. The Board stated at pages 10-11: The appellant would not lose its rights to its legal non-conforming use during a closure for a voluntary repair or even replacement of the building. The Board notes the words of the court in Rotstein v. OroMedonte (Township of): “. . . intention is a relevant factor to be con­ sidered in the case of a long-established pattern of use.” Finally, the Board rejected the two-year limitation period for repairing and reoccupying specified in sections 3(3)(b) and 3(4)(b) of the CZBL. The Board wrote at page 11: Again, there is nothing in section 34(9)(a) which allows for the extin­ guishment of a landowner’s right to a legal non-conforming use if re­ pairs or renovations are not completed before the expiry of two years. As noted above, “intention” is determinative. If a landowner demon­ strates a continuous intention to continue a long-established pattern of usage, there is no loss of its right, regardless of the time it takes to complete repairs. The Board then ultimately concluded that “section 3 of the CZBL, in its entirety, improperly narrows, amends and re­ stricts the right of a property owner to a legal non-con- Judgment orders: (416) 609-3800; Fax (416) 298-5094 Page 223 of 231 3 4 D.M.P.L. (2d), January 2010 forming use, contrary to section 34(9)(a) of the Planning Act. Section 3 is beyond the jurisdiction of the City” (page 11). Divisional Court Decision The City sought leave to appeal the decision of the Board repealing section 3 of the CZBL to the Divisional Court. As a preliminary matter, the City sought that subsections 3(6) to (8) of the CZBL be restored. There was no evidence before the Board that these three subsections were unlawful pursu­ ant to the Planning Act. In fact, both the planners for the City and TDL supported these provisions. Justice Toscano Roc­ camo ordered, on consent of both parties, that subsections 3(6) to (8) be remitted to a rehearing of the matter before the OMB pursuant to section 43 of the Ontario Municipal Board Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.28. After reviewing the parties’ submissions with respect to the standard of review, the court held the appropriate standard of a review of a decision of the Board to be reasonableness, given that “the Board has specialized expertise in interpret­ ing the provisions of the Planning Act, including Section 34, and in applying its underlying policies” (para. 19). While admitting that “the interpretation of Section 3 of the CZBL is open to considerable debate, such as to arguably run afoul of Section 34(9) of the Planning Act” (para. 28) and that its position with respect to the definition of “dam­ age” in the CZBL was “evolving” (para. 29), the City never­ theless asserted that: [V]oluntary “demolition” of a structure as under Section 3(4) of the CZBL justifies termination of legal non-conforming rights in the ab­ sence of any intention to continue the non-conforming use at the time the by-law was passed, coupled with an interruption in continuity or physical existence of the structure. (para. 29) TDL argued that the Board’s reasoning was an appropriate application of the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Ot­ tawa (City) v. Capital Parking Inc. (2002), 28 M.P.L.R. (3d) 223, 212 D.L.R. (4th) 342, 2002 CarswellOnt 1197, 158 O.A.C. 174, 59 O.R. (3d) 327, [2002] O.J. No. 1511 (Ont. C.A.), which concerned whether the defendant, which en­ joyed a legal non-conforming use as a public garage, could be subject to performance standards in the City of Ottawa’s zoning by-laws. All zoning by-laws fall under one of either of two categories: (1) land use provisions; or (2) performance standards provi­ sions. In Capital Parking, Doherty J.A. applied the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Saint-Romuald and held that per­ formance standards will fail where they are found to interfere with acquired rights, in that they alter the nature of a legal non-conforming use or interfere with the real and reasonable expectations flowing from a legal non-conforming use (para. 35). TDL took the position, supported by the Court, that sec­ tion 3 of the CZBL, which was a performance standard be­ cause it did not purport to regulate the types of uses of land, ran afoul of the holding in Capital Parking because the pro­ hibition on voluntary repair or renovation unlawfully inter­ fered with the real and reasonable expectation for the right to “renewal and change” of non-conforming uses as articulated in Saint-Romuald. After reviewing the submissions of both parties, Toscano Roccamo J. found that “the Board’s decision in this matter was well reasoned and correct” (para. 39), and stated at paragraphs 36-37 that: In specific reference to Capital Parking, supra, where it engaged the reasoning applied in Saint-Romuald, the Board concluded that ac­ quired rights entitled property owners to some flexibility in the opera­ tion of the use, including normal evolution of some uses. The Board concluded that normal evolution of use could encompass demolition and rebuilding of a property within its footprint with the intention to continue the use of the building or structure as it existed prior to the enactment of a by-law. I find no error in the Board’s reasoning in this respect. In concluding that Section 3 of the CZBL operated to frustrate the normal evolution of a legal non-conforming use through renewal and change, the board accepted the reasoning in Rotstein v. Oro-Medonte (Township of) (2002), 34 M.P.L.R. (3d) 266 (Ont. Sup. Ct.) and Mo­ hammed v. Dysart (Municipality) Building Official (2003), 45 M.P.L.R. (3d) 282 (Ont. Sup. Ct.) in support of the proposition that where a landowner demonstrates a long established pattern of use, there is no loss of rights that flows from interruption in use for reno­ vations or repairs, whether or not within the control of the property owner, and regardless of the time needed to effect repairs. Again, I find no cause to doubt the Board’s reasoning in this regard. Accordingly, the City’s motion for leave to appeal to the Di­ vision Court was dismissed. Discussion As noted above, municipalities across Ontario purport to re­ strict property owners’ rights to repair, renovate or use build­ ings that are non-conforming as to use, in apparent (and now confirmed) contravention of section 34(9)(a) of the Planning Act. This is not surprising given that acquired rights are a thorn in the side of municipal planners since they interfere with the achievement of the City’s vision articulated in mu­ nicipal official plans. The decision of the Board and the Divisional Court in the matter of the Ottawa (City) v. TDL Group Corp. represents a warning to cities across the province that the courts will not tolerate attempts by municipalities to overreach their powers under the Planning Act and the law to contravene legal non­ conforming rights. As noted by Killeen J. in 382671 Ontario Ltd. v. London (City) Chief Building Official (1996), 32 M.P.L.R. (2d) 1, 1996 CarswellOnt 1388, [1996] O.J. No. 1352, 28 O.R. (3d) 718 (Ont. Gen. Div.) by-laws that seek to restrict non-conforming rights are “nothing more nor less than a clever attempt by the municipality to trench upon and even disembowel section 34(9) of the [Planning] Act” (para. 25). Indeed, many municipalities across the province of Ontario are arguably running afoul of the law with respect to non­ conforming rights. At the time of writing, zoning by-laws in the City of Orillia, the Town of Haldimand, the City of Sudbury, and the Town of Dunnville all essentially permit, with minor variances in wording, the strengthening or resto­ ration to a safe condition of any non-conforming building or structure, while restricting the right to rebuild or repair only Judgment orders: (416) 609-3800; Fax (416) 298-5094 Page 224 of 231 4 D.M.P.L. (2d), January 2010 4 for situations where the non-conforming building or structure is damaged or destroyed by causes beyond the control of the owner. See City of Orillia’s By-laws No. 2005-72, ss. 3.4.3 and 3.4.5; the Town of Haldimand’s By-laws 1-H 86, ss. 6.3.1 and 6.3.2; the City of Sudbury’s By-laws No. 95-500Z, s. 4(4)(a); and the Town of Dunnville’s By-laws 1-DU 80, ss. 6.3.1 and 6.3.2. The effect of these by-laws is to prohibit voluntary repair or renovation other than for the purpose of improving the safety condition of a non-conforming building or structure. Consequently, renovation for upgrading or mod­ ernizing a building, such as the installation of energy-saving windows, would arguably not be permitted. However, as the Board noted in the TDL decision, such restrictions on volun­ tary repair and renovation are in direct conflict with Binnie J.’s ruling in Saint-Romuald that municipalities cannot frus­ trate the normal evolution of non-conforming uses through “renewal and change”. Even more egregious violations of non-conforming rights can be found in zoning by-laws that prohibit the restoration of non-conforming buildings or structures when they are damaged or destroyed even in cases where the destruction is due to causes beyond the control of the owner. For example, the City of Guelph prohibits “the rebuilding of a non-con­ forming use if it should be destroyed” (Zoning By-law (1995) — 14864, s. 2.5.3.4). No definition is provided for the term “destroyed”. The City of Barrie prohibits the resto­ ration of any non-conforming building or structure “other than a single detached dwelling, converted dwelling or a multiple family dwelling which has been destroyed to the ex­ tent of more than fifty percent of the structure (exclusive of walls below grade)” (Zoning By-law 85-95, s. 4.2.6). While residents of the City of Thunder Bay who own legal non­ conforming “occupied dwellings” that are “damaged or de­ stroyed by accidental fire or a natural disaster” are permitted to reconstruct their buildings, owners of legal non-con­ forming buildings or structures “other than a dwelling . . . which has been damaged by accidental fire or natural disas­ ter to the extent of more than sixty percent (60%) of its value are precluded from restoring their buildings or structures” (Zoning By-law 177-1983, s. 5.11.1(a) and (b)). Such attempts are contrary to Toscano Roccamo J.’s holding in the TDL Group Corp. case that “where a landowner dem­ onstrates a long established pattern of use, there is no loss of rights that flows from interruption in use for renovations or repairs, whether or not within the control of the property owner” (para. 37). It should be noted that nowhere in the Planning Act are distinctions made with respect to repair and renovation rights between different types of non-conforming uses, and therefore such attempts in the above noted by-laws are unjustified and unlawful. Finally, there are also examples of zoning by-laws from across the province that place time limits on the repair or re­ construction of a non-conforming building or structure simi­ lar to the two-year limitation period in subsections 3(3)(b) and 3(4)(b) of the City of Ottawa’s CZBL that were repealed by the Board and the Court. The City of Kingston permits the replacement of a non-conforming building destroyed by any means beyond the control of the owner “provided that construction is commenced within one year from the date of destruction and provided that the building is completed within a reasonable time thereafter” (Zoning By-law No. 8499, s. 5.24(a)). Similarly, the City of Orillia allows the re­ building or repair of any building or structure that is dam­ aged or destroyed by causes beyond the control of the owner “provided such rebuilding or repair is conducted within two years” (Zoning By-law 2005-72, s. 3.4.5). However, as the Board held in its decision at page 11, and which was af­ firmed by the Divisional Court, “[i]f a landowner demon­ strates a continuous intention to continue a long-established pattern of usage, there is no loss of its right, regardless of the time it takes to complete repairs.” The above examples of zoning by-laws from across Ontario demonstrate the extent to which municipalities attempt to “encourage” or cause the “evolution” over time from legal non-conforming uses to ones in conformity with current zon­ ing by-laws. The judgment in Ottawa (City) v. TDL Group Corp. represents for the first time a clear and unambiguous ruling that such efforts by municipalities are contrary to sec­ tion 34(9)(a) of the Planning Act and are, therefore, beyond their jurisdiction. Municipalities must ensure that their zon­ ing by-laws conform to the law with respect to legal non­ conforming rights. Michael Polowin is a partner with Gowling Lafleur Hender­ son LLP in Ottawa, practicing in Development and Planning Law. Mr. Polowin advises and represents clients through the full spectrum of the development process. He has acted for some of the largest developers in Canada, and has been in­ volved in developments throughout the Ottawa area and Eastern and Southern Ontario. Mr. Polowin also acts on be­ half of municipalities in Eastern Ontario on planning and development and public-private partnership matters. Elad Gafni is an Articling Student with Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP in Ottawa, where he also worked as a Sum­ mer Student. He graduated in 2009 with an LL.B. (Cum Laude) from the English Common Law Program at the Uni­ versity of Ottawa. Prior to law school Elad attended Queen’s University on a Chancellor’s Scholarship where he received a B.A. (Hons.) in Economics, as well as the University of To­ ronto on an Ontario Graduate Scholarship where he re­ ceived an M.A. in Economics. Judgment orders: (416) 609-3800; Fax (416) 298-5094 Page 225 of 231 ^sg^ ^ ^ TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC f u, P.O. Box 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario, KOH 2TO Telephone 376-3027 /1-800-559-5862 FAX (613) 376-6657 E-mail: rvandewal@southfrontenac.net OFFICE OF THE MAYOR February 10, 2016 Dear Public Works Staff and First Responders: On behalf of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac, I wish to extend our appreciation to the Public Works staff and First Responders who assisted Marill.lamngton!nh recertheaKhOTer9ency.at^ ^Y Roacigarage^e immediate response from staff with First Aid and CPR training was commendable. Council continues to be committed to employee training as it is clear that no one knowswhenyoumay beca"ed to action to a^ ^ers. We acknowledge'how difficult this emergency situation must have been especially when a fellow employee is in distress. Our Employee Assistance Program is available should anyone wish to access it. ^^Thare_°.u,r s,ir\cere appreciation to a11 those involved in assisting during this emergency and helping a fellow staff member. Yours sincerely » ^w^ y;^ /f^ / ,/ / Ron Vandewal Mayor Township of South Frontenac RV:am Fr ee Page 226 of 231 You’re Invited! Bicycle Friendly Communities Workshop March 30, 2016 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. KFL&A Public Health 221 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontario Please join us for an informative, inspirational and practical workshop led by Share the Road on how cycling can help promote vibrant healthy communities. In this full-day workshop, participants will: Identify community cycling assets and gaps using the Bicycle Friendly Communities’ Framework Set goals, establish priorities and identify realistic next steps Create a short term, actionoriented work plan Encourage collaboration to ensure the work plan is put into action Register Now Please register by Friday March 18, 2016 and indicate any specific dietary requirements. For more information, contact: Marg Isbester, Deputy Mayor, Township of Greater Napanee, 613-561-2975 or Ross Sutherland, Councillor Township of South Frontenac, 613-532-7846 Page 227 of 231 Bicycle Friendly Communities Workshop Overview Workshop Outcomes Include: A detailed report from Share the Road summarizing workshop discussions, community analysis and a short term work plan will be produced for each participating community. Increased collaboration between groups working to promote cycling. Develop a clear work plan to build a more bicycle-friendly community. Infrastructure Tour: The Share the Road facilitator will undertake an infrastructure tour of each community, by bicycle, prior to the workshop. Visioning: Attendees will explore medium and short term goals for cycling in their community. This facilitated session is based on the Five E’s framework of the Bicycle Friendly Communities program and will have participants collaborate to identify priority actions to build a more bicycle friendly community in 5 years. The Five E’s are: Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Enforcement and Evaluation & Planning. Working Lunch: When looking at the most Bicycle Friendly Communities in North America, it is not the big cities like New York or San Francisco that are making the biggest strides. It’s the smaller communities – places under 100,000 residents – that are making the most rapid changes when it comes to creating safer roads for all road users. As part of this session, participants will hear inspirational stories from communities similar to South Frontenac and Greater Napanee and learn how cycling and active transportation can help create a thriving community. Silo Smasher: This session will help to identify ways South Frontenac and Greater Napanee can work together to achieve their shared goal of building bicycle friendly communities. Complete Streets: This design exercise will build upon the infrastructure tour. Participants will share their impressions of cycling in their communities, identify priority areas for improvements and explore the trade-offs that occur when planning for Complete Streets. World Café: This evening session will be held in each community to introduce community members and cycling advocates to three key actions or topics identified during the workshop and allow for community feedback on the work plan. The World Café is facilitated by Share the Road with assistance from South Frontenac Rides and Napanee Rides and Strides committee members. 2016 Conference Schedule Sunday March 6, 2016 11:00 am to 12:00 pm to 2:00 pm to 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm to 7:00 pm 6:00 pm 4:00 pm 7:00 pm 9:00 pm Page 228 of 231 Registration Opens Exhibitor Set-up Supplier PresentationsConference Welcome Reception KKtZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůWƌŽŐƌĂŵŶŶŽƵŶĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕dŽǁŶ,ĂůůĂŶĚĨĨŝůŝĂƚĞĚƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶWĂŶĞůŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶ Monday March 7, 2016 7:45 am to 8:30 am 8:30 am to 4:30 pm 8:30 am to 8:45 am 8:45 am to 9:45 am 9:45 am to 10:15 am Breakfast & Registration Tradeshow Hours Opening Remarks - Ed Gardner, KFL&A Public Health Keynote Address: Where Onsite & Decentralized Fits in Ontario's Push for Clean Technology” - Alex Gill, ONEIA A Call to Action to the Wastewater Community: Is Ontario Missing the Boat on Decentralized Solutions? - Trish Johnson, R.V. Anderson 10:15 am to 10:45 am Tradeshow Break 10:45 am to 11:45 am How to Effectively Manage Your Business Cash Flow Colin Sprake, Make Your Mark 11:45 am to 1:00 pm Networking Lunch 1:00 pm to 1:40 pm 1:00 pm to 1:40 pm 1:40 pm to 2:20 pm 1:40 pm to 2:20 pm dLJƉĞŝƐƉĞƌƐĂůĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƌĂĚLJ^ƚƌĂǁ͕tĂƚĞƌůŽŽŝŽĨŝůƚĞƌ OOWA Best Practices for Pump Chambers and Filter Beds OOWA Onsite Technical Committee Members The Fetherston Mobile Park: An Ongoing Case Study in Innovation Wilf StefĂn and Gillian Dumencu, Clearford Water^LJƐƚĞŵƐ Wastewater Treatment System Research Updates Kevin Wong, Canadian Water Quality Association 2:20 pm to 2:30 pm Balancing Break 2:30 pm to 3:00 pm 2:30 pm to 3:00 pm ŽƐƚĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞKŶƐŝƚĞtĂƐƚĞǁĂƚĞƌdƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚʹĂƌƚǁƌŝŐŚƚ^ƉƌŝŶŐƐƌĞǁĞƌLJ ZĂLJŵŽŶĚŽLJĚ͕WƌĞŵŝĞƌdĞĐŚƋƵĂ Cold Weather Best Practices Chris James, Waterloo Biofilter Onsite Sewage Program Management in Nova Scotia: A Public-Private Partnership Leah Boutilier, Nova Scotia Environment Winter Residential Septic System Inspections Greg Keith, Matrix Home Inspections KŶƚĂƌŝŽΖƐƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽĚĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ d;DD,Ϳ 3:00 pm to 3:30 pm 3:00 pm to 3:30 pm 3:30 pm to 4:00 pm 3:30 pm to 4:00 pm Case Study: Legumier Du Madawaska Project - Fixed Film Treatment for Industrial Wastewater Rene Hawkes, Bishop Water Technologies 4:00 pm to 4:30 pm Networking Tradeshow Break 4:30 6:30 7:30 9:30 OOWA Annual General Meeting Pre-Banquet Reception Banquet Awards Dinner OOWA Hospitality Sponsored Event pm to 5:45 pm pm to 7:30 pm pm to 9:30 pm pm onwards Tuesday March 8, 2016 7:45 am to 8:30 am 8:30 am to 8:45 am 8:45 am to 9:45 am 9:45 am to 10:30 am Breakfast & Registration Opening Remarks SORA's Interaction with Industry and Government on Contemporary U.S.Decentralized Wastewater Gerald Iwan, State Onsite Regulators Alliance Installation and Design Relationships: Challenges and Solutions Dave Gustafson, University of Minnesota Water Resource Centre 10:30 am to 10:45 am Tradeshow Break 10:45 am to 11:30 am Aligning Company and Regulator Interests to Increase Acceptance of Onsite Wastewater Systems in Ontario Lesley Herstein, WaterTAP ϭϭ͗ϯϬĂŵƚŽϭϮ͗ϭϱƉŵ Types of Wells for Onsite Installers Craig Stainton, OGWA ϭϮ͗ϭϱƉŵƚŽϭϮ͗ϰϱƉŵ Cottage Associations: Your Connection to 250,000 Septic Systems Terry Rees, FOCA (Federation of Ontario Cottage Associations) ϭϮ͗ϰϱƉŵƚŽϭ͗ϬϬƉŵ ŽŶĨĞƌĞŶĐĞůŽƐŝŶŐZĞŵĂƌŬƐ ϭ͗ϬϬƉŵƚŽϯ͗ϬϬƉŵ >ƵŶĐŚĂŶĚdƌĂĚĞƐŚŽǁ,ŽƵƌƐ Page 229 of 231 Delegate Registration Form 2016 Annual Conference & Trade Show Delegate Registration Information Organization | Company Name: Registration Contact Name: Mailing Address: City: Prov | St: Phone: Fax: Postal | Zip Code: Attendee Information Full Name: Membership # If Applicable Banquet Attendance E-Mail Phone ⎕ ⎕ ⎕ ⎕ ⎕ ⎕ Please list any allergies, dietary restrictions, or special requirements (in addition to who they apply to here): Registration Admission | Package Selection Full Conference Pass and Banquet Dinner Package Member Non-Member Student | Spouse $440 (+HST=ϰϵϳ͘ϮϬ) $540 (+HST=ϲϭϬ͘ϮϬ) $290 (+HST=ϯϮϳ͘ϳϬ) $350 (+HST=395.50) $450 (+HST=508.50) $200 (+HST=226.00) $175 (+HST=197.75) March 7, 2016 $225 (+HST=254.25) March 7, 2016 $100 (+HST=113.00) March 7, 2016 $90 (+HST=101.70) Banquet Table (10 seats): $750.00 Unlimited Access to all Conference Events and Meals Full Conference Day Pass (No Banquet Dinner Admission) Unlimited Access to all Day Time Events and Meals Single Day Pass Access to Monday’s Events Banquet Dinner Ticket Admittance to Awards Ceremony & Banquet Dinner Page 230 of 231 Payment Information Total Amount Enclosed: (Including HST) Payment Method: ☐ Visa ☐ MasterCard ☐ Cheque *Cheques may be made payable to the “Ontario Onsite Wastewater Association” Card Number: CVS: Cardholder Name: Signature: Expiry: Date: Overnight Accommodation Rooms and Accommodation start at: 105.00! Please call The Kingston Ambassador Hotel and Conference Centre at: 1-800-267-7ϴ80, and quote the “Special Convention Rate for the Ontario Onsite Wastewater Association”. Be sure to book by February 5th, 2016, space is limited!! Submit your Registration Submit your completed Delegate Registration with Payment to: Email: Toll Free: Rachel Robichaud: op-coordinator@oowa.org 1-855-905-6692 Questions? Contact OOWA’s Staff: Rachel Robichaud: op-coordinator@oowa.org Mike Gibbs: outreach@oowa.org T: 1-855-905-OOWA (6692) Page 231 of 231 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2016-17 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of March 1st, 2016 be confirmed. 2. Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk-Administrator of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed. 3. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 1st day of March, 2016. Read a first and second time this 1st day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this 1st day of March, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC ______________________________ Ron Vandewal, Mayor ____________________________________ Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer
Help support independent journalism
If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.
Buy Me a Coffee