Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: March 1, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac
[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2016/Council Meeting - 01 Mar 2016 - Agenda.pdf)
Document Text
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:
6:00 PM, Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Council Chambers.
Call to Order
a)
Resolution
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof
Scheduled Closed Session
a)
Litigation
***Recess *** - reconvene at 7:00 pm in Open Session
Public Meeting
a)
Open Public Meeting - Resolution
b)
Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough: Bannon
4-9
c)
Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 26, Concession V Bedford District: Isaacs,
10 - 18
Approval of Minutes
a)
January 26, 2016 Committee of the Whole Meeting
19 - 22
b)
February 2, 2016 Council Meeting
23 - 28
c)
February 9, 2016 Committee of the Whole Meeting
29 - 31
Business Arising from the Minutes
a)
2015 Annual Report - Sydenham Water Treatment Sydenham (resolution only)
b)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Cataraqui Trail Management Board (See By-law 2016-07)
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing (February 16 and March 1)
33 - 56
b)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender No PW-2016-02
- Tandem Dump Truck
57 - 58
c)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance between Concessions IX and X and Lots 30 and 31, Bedford District: Mahmud
59 - 64
d)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Assumption of Road Widening: Part Lot
65 - 66
32
Page 2 of 231
12, Concession X, Storrington District: Ramparts Rd e)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Severance Applications at Petworth Rd: Possible Parkland Dedication: Kerr
67 - 74
f)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Draft Plan Conditions for Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession VII, 1278804 Ontario Inc (T. Grant)
75 113
g)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance in Part of Lot 26, Concession V and VI, Bedford District: Corrigan
114 119
h)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Approval of Subdivision Agreement Part of Lots 18 & 19, Concession II: Willowbrook Estates
120 124
i)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Approval of Condominium Agreement Part of Lots 20 & 21, Concession IV: Applewood Estates
125 128
j)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Non-Union Staff Compensation and Performance Evaluation
129
Committee Meeting Minutes
a)
South Frontenac Rides Committee meeting held November 2, 2015
130 132
b)
South Frontenac Rides Committee meeting of January 11, 2016
133 134
c)
Verona Community Association meeting of November 11, 2015
135 137
d)
Verona Community Association meeting of January 13, 2016
138 139
e)
Public Services Committee meeting of November 26, 2015
140 142
f)
Loughborough District Recreation Meeting held January 25, 2016
143 145
By-Laws
a)
By-law 2016-07 - Cataraqui Trail Management Board
146
b)
By-law 2016-11 - Closing of Road Allowance
147 148
c)
By-law 2016-12 - Bannon Rezoning
149 150
d)
By-law 2016-13 - Isaacs Rezoning
151 152
e)
By-law 2016-14 - Willowbrook Subdivision Agreement
153 189
f)
By-law 2016-15 - Magenta Waterfront Condominium Development
190 -
Page 3 of 231
205 206
g)
By-law 2016-16 - Road Widening -Ramparts Rd
Reports for Information
a)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Observations from FCM Sustainable Communities Conference February 9-11
207
b)
Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Infrastructure funding announcement
208
Information Items
a)
Ontario Energy Board Notice, re: cost recovery of expanding natural gas service
209 211
b)
Jeff Leal, Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, re: 2016 Premier’s Award for Agri-Food Innovation Excellence Program
212 213
c)
Louis Antonakos, Mayor, Town of Carleton Place, re: OMAFRA Grant Scoring
214 215
d)
Ontario Newsroom - Province Seeking Public Feedback on its Strategy for a Safer Ontario
216 217
e)
Buck Lake Association - Outboard Motor Emissions.
218
f)
Robin Walker and Joanna Stricker, re: Response to February 9Committee of the Whole Agenda Item 6(a)
219 224
g)
Mayor and Council’s Letter of Thanks to Public Works Staff and First Responders
225
h)
Bicycle Friendly Communities Workshop - March 30, 2016
226 227
i)
Ontario Onsite Wastewater Association - 2016 Tradeshow and Annual Conference
228 230
Notice of Motions
Announcements
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
Closed Session (if requested)
Confirmatory By-law
a)
By-law 2016-17
Adjournment
a)
Resolution
231
Page 4 of 231 Staff Report: Public Meeting
Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 22, 2016 Applicant: Bannon
Planning Department
File No. Z-16/02
Subject: Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council approve a zoning by-law amendment that would rezone an existing 14 acre rural lot to permit a group home.
Purpose of the report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a zoning bylaw amendment and to hold a public meeting on the application as required under section 34 of the Planning Act. The report includes a location attachment, a depiction of the lot showing the facility (building) and an amending by-law.
Background: An application has been submitted to amend the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law to rezone an existing 5.6 hectare (14 ac.) rural residential lot from Rural (RU) Zone to a special rural zone to permit it to be used as a group home. The subject land is shown on Attachment #1. As shown, the lot is situated in a relatively built up residential area amongst other residences on Campbell Road. The lot is an unusual shape with only 24 metres of road frontage. The property is developed with a dwelling and two accessory buildings but most of the lot is undeveloped and forested. Attachment #2 shows the location of the development. The attachment illustrates that the dwelling is situated far back from the road and behind and distant from the other dwellings on the adjacent lots.
Analysis: The land is designated Rural in the Official Plan. The Plan provides that group homes will be permitted in all designations that allow residential uses but must be on lots with public road access. The Comprehensive Zoning By-law states that group homes are permitted subject to a site-specific amendment to the by-law. It requires that adequate parking be provided for each attendant and staff member. The by-law defines a group home:
“GROUP HOME” shall mean a dwelling unit in which not less than three nor more than six people receive specialized or sheltered residential care and accommodation by virtue of their physical, mental, emotional, social or legal status and which is approved or licensed in accordance with any Act of the Parliament of Ontario. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, group homes include a home for foster children, a home for elderly persons, a home for mentally or physically
Page 5 of 231 challenged persons and a home for people who are convalescing after hospital treatment and are under medical supervision but does
not include a facility
maintained and operated primarily for persons:
who have been placed on probation under the Probation Act, The Criminal Code (Canada) or the Juvenile Delinquent Act (Canada); or
who have been released on parole under the Ministry of Correctional Services Act; the Parole Act (Canada) or the Provincial Offenses Act; or
who are admitted to the institution for correctional purposes.
According to the applicant, the home:
would offer 24 hour daily live-in support, would give shelter to children aged 8 to 12 years (just boys), is a privately run group home for youth with developmental challenges ie., youth with difficulties learning basic living skills, operates under licence with the Ministry of Community of Social Services, accepts patrons who are referred from the Children’s Aid Society
The amending by-law would change the zone on the area of the lot from Rural (RU) to Special Rural (RU-50) to recognize the proposed use.
Agency Comments: In response to the notices advertising the proposed group home use, a letter dated February 18, 2016, was received by a property-owner located on the other side of the road from the subject site. The letter lists a number of questions about the proposed use that he would like answered. In response to the letter, the applicant spoke with the neighbour and he provided answers to each of the questions. Attachment #3 is a copy of the neighbour’s list of questions and the applicant’s answers. At time of preparation of this report no other comments had been received from the public.
Conclusion: The proposed group home is supported by the Official Plan which contemplates such homes in all designations provided they locate on public roads. The zoning by-law defines ‘group home’ and the proposal falls well within the definition. The layout of the subject lot appears to be well-suited to accommodate the home in that it fronts on a public road, is mostly out of site from adjacent residences and is large enough to provide amenities for the patrons eg., walking trails and other recreation. The proposal is therefore supported.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached zoning amending By-law No. 2016-12 to rezone the area of the proposed group home from Rural (RU) Zone to Special Rural Zone (RU-50), be passed. attachments BannonZoningReport
Page 6 of 231 rJ
Attachment #1
?’?h
‘?l N W?
7
E
,s,@E
%-
l
s
U
N
l
a
RnTTThr
m!MIT?-l r?nAr)
L!
U
t
l
A 2
4a.. sO ?iB
9
iA I@
?h r-
r
m
J
r’li’:l ?Y!71!1
l ffl
‘%
Subject Property ] LIJ
J
li Io0 70 140
L
I
I
280
420
i Meters 560 I
]
Page 7 of 231
Page 8 of 231
ATTACHMENT #3 Bannon:Z-1 6/02, Part Lot 1, Concession IV, Loughborough District
ZONING AMENDMENT QUESTIONS (ANSWERS) How does the Planning Application define ?Residential treatment home?? The new term for a residential group setting is " Residential treatment Home? and is no longer “Group Home? that is stated in South Frontenac Bylaw.
Does the application provide a definition of ?youth with developmental needs? Youth with Developmental Needs is defined as youth that have difficulties learning basic skills as a person. . . Personal hygiene, proper communication skills, daily routines ect. .. How many clients would it serve?
I will be serving 4 clients at one time but have the ability to serve up to 6 per South Frontenac By-Law.
Where will the clients come from?
The clients that will be served will come from the Kingston area on an as needed basis. They will be local youth in need of the service.
What kind of programs will it offer’. We will offer a 24h?r staffed residential treatment home for 8-1 2yr old youth male. Would the property be fenced?
- This property will not be fenced. Are the type of individuals going to require secure conditions? These Youth will not be in need of secure conditions.
Will there be any restrictions or oversight on who resides at the group home? The Ministry of Children and Youth Services places the restrictions and oversight on who may reside at this home.
What is the governance model ?-Iegislation, organizational structure, oversight?
- This is a privately run company with an internal organization structure.
Is this a private group home someone is starting or are they affiliated with municipal or provincial agencies? Are they affiliated with New Leaf Link? Yes this is a private run group home that’ s program has been mnning for over 25 yrs. No New Leaf is for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.
Page 9 of 231
Who would be paying for staffing? This is a privately run home. Who will be providing programs? Clinicians?
This is privately run Home in coordination with various community supports and servrces.
Is the township going to subsidize it? No funding will come from the Township.
What kind of insurance would be required?
This is a privately run Home that is in need of intensive Insurance.
I hope this answers all of your concerns and questions you may have. If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me at anytime.
Thank you, Justin Bannon 613-583-7150
Page 10 of 231 PLANNING REPORT PUBLIC MEETING Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: February 24, 2016
Planning Department File No. Z-16/03
Date of Report: March 1, 2016 Subject: Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 26, Concession V, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Isaacs Summary of the Recommendation The recommendation is that Council pass a zoning by-law amendment that would rezone a portion of land as part of a proposed lot addition. Waterfrontage is being added to an existing resort lot that is partially zoned Open Space Private (OSP-4). The application is to rezone that portion from OSP-4 to Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW). The rezoning is a condition of Consent Application S-44-15-B. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a zoning bylaw amendment and to hold a public meeting on the application as required under the terms of the Planning Act. The report includes a location attachment, two lot configuration maps, a letter from an abutting property-owner and an amending by-law. Background An application has been submitted to amend the Township’s zoning by-law as a condition of consent for a lot addition. The rezoning would apply to a portion of land that is used as a resort comprising four rental cabins and accessory uses. However, the resort land is split zoned with the west portion zoned Recreational Resort Commercial (RRC-30) and the east portion zoned Special Open Space Private (OSP-4). The special OSP-4 zone was originally to allow only walking trails as part of the resort and to prohibit any buildings or structures. A portion of waterfrontage is being added to the resort and this is to be used for residential purposes along with the portion presently zoned OSP-4. Attachment #1 shows the subject area to be rezoned and Attachment #2 shows the proposed lot addition and the lot being added to. Attachment #3 shows the final lot configuration. It should be noted that the portion being added to the resort land is already zoned RLSW and, with the portion being rezoned from OSP-4 to RLSW the result would effectively be a waterfront area 1.8 hectares (4.5 ac.) in size. The rezoning is a condition of Consent Application S-44-15-B. Discussion The resort is a long established commercial use with four rental cabins and accessory structures, as noted. The lands are designated Rural in the Official Plan which designation permits both resort uses and residential uses within this lakefront environment. The property is situated on a peninsula of land on Bobs Lake, accessed by Burns Lane which runs through the centre of the subject land to six waterfront residential lots beyond. This laneway effectively defines the boundary of the RRC-30 zone and the OSP-4 zone and it would now define the boundary of the RRC-30 zone and the RLSW zone. Conclusion In consideration of the above review, it is this Department’s conclusion that the re-zoning of the portion of the resort from OSP-4 to RLSW would allow better
Page 11 of 231 use of the land according to the owner’s wishes. The remaining part of the resort land would still be large at 1.2 hectares which would still accommodate the modest scale rental cabins while the residential portion would be approximately 1.8 hectares in size. The land is presently split-zoned and the amendment would in effect simply change the category of the split zoning. The lot addition would also help to regularize the lot fabric to some degree. Thus, the rezoning is supported. Public and Agency Comments In response to the public notification of the rezoning, a letter dated February 16, 2016, was received from an abutting property-owner who expresses concerns with the application. The concerns relate to the fact that:
- the area is already highly developed and more development would harm the environment,
- butternut trees might be harmed,
- Bob’s lake Cottages might turn the retained parcel into full-time rental,
- split zoning is inappropriate and may lead to further expansion of the commercial use,
- the rezoning may enable the property-owner to build close to his residence A copy of the letter is attached hereto as Attachment #4. The Planning Department responded to the concerns in an e-mail dated February 18, 2016 also attached. All agencies commented favourably as part of the consent application. At the time of preparation of this report no other comments had been received from the public in response to the notification of the public meeting. Recommendation On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that the attached zoning amending By-law No. 2016-13, to change the zone on the added portion of land from OSP-4 to RLSW following from Consent Application S-44-15-B, be passed. IsaacsRezoningReport
Page 12 of 231
Attachment #1
41
81
‘?
,9
z
N
W-jE s
O ,:3,20 )
SubjectArea (I;’ (
)
5,
Cj
S
,o+4%
0
(1
<#
Bobs Lake
, >e u r k e
%
b
sPond
Meters
0 115230 460 690 920
Page 13 of 231
Attachment #2
p??mMl =%/
?
N
s
aa8. o b s L a k e
W$E
'
l
l
Proposed
Lot Addition
Lottobe Oaaha
added to z
1.1 ha %}, .
S
iSX.,x
‘..
, S,/ ’ ,/
(!
“%
%
lBobs
l
Meters
01530 so go 120
Lake
Page 14 of 231 !
Attachment #3
?I 1€
J
WaaE /,/ -., % X -%%. S u ., 1.’ l’%,/a ) [,// ,t,. h–’–‘A t!aaaXt ( %., / ( 1, y . aa a ! o b s L a k e )
.1
M
i
(1
W
{!
x
}
}
t
l
)l }.
i
)
)t l [
l l
i
‘, ,, ’l ,
!
)
/
! {
‘,,i
(
i
}/
Final Lot
'
t '
{l Configuration )
! v
i(
l
{
l
i
i
i t
}
= (
l ‘% ( S / ./ ‘%. ! / ‘=,
%,
z
/ ,, ., / X/’ X’ -‘X’*,:, /% x’ .i;% ‘7 / .’ a. i’ < /’ ,, , !’ %
,a ‘%,
/a ’l,.
f
7
/
]’! z ‘. l,/J % X / ,i[ " X
- )S 7 7 S% ’ 7a’a .t l i.t-,,. Js % ia ,,,), = ‘..
s.:
,(
J
/./.#%
/
‘%
S
, ., 77 S-., ‘%S =% .,.-’/
il
’l!%., /”
, {/ Bobs Lake
Meters
10 15 30 60 90 120
]
f/
r,)
Page 15 of 231
AffacAmetht ‘4/ 1108 - 12 Yonge Streel Toronfo, ON M5E1Z9
February ] 6, 2016
Planning Department 4432 George St, Sydenham ON KOH 2TO
Oeor Lindsay Mills:
Please accept this leller as notice l wish to be notified of the decision of +he South Frontenac
Council with respect jo +he following Application for Zoning Amendment - ISSC?CS: 216/03, Part Lot 26, Concession V; Bedford District.
l am the owner of the property at 80 Burns Lane North. My property neighbors the properly subject +o the rezoning applicotion.
l would like to outline my concerns regarding the aforementioned application: *
I+ has not been made clear in +he application why the rezoning has been requested. It is believed the rezoning is faking place fo allow fhe consfruction of addifional building(s) on the property. l formally request additional information of +he location, size and number of buildings being proposed for +he property in question.
This orea is already a highly developed par+ of Bob’s Lake, containing a number of yeorround and seasonal properties including (bu+ not Iimi+ed +o) the following Recreational Resort Commercial Zone properl:es: RRC-29, lrwin’s Cabins, RRC-30 Morters Camp, RRC40 Twin Oaks Camp, RRC-3 1 Whi’l’ehouse Camp and RRC-42 Greeri Bay Heritage Cabins. This is one of the few unspoiled natural shorelines in fhe oreo. Any additional development will most certainly have an environmentol impact. There are a number of Bu+ternut trees on +he properly. Butternut trees are officially designated an endangered species under Ontario’s Endangered Species Act and
subject to very specific restrictions with respect to felling and clearing. Developmen+ on +his parcel will potenfially puf ’the Butternut trees af risk. It is +o be noted the owners hove previously +aken little regard to environmental issues and have cleared lond within 10 meters of the lake. This was previously brought to the +ownships attention.
I am concerned the ovvriers of Bob’s Lake Co+tages plan to turn the retained parcel into full time weekly ren+al accomrrioda+ion based on +heir business model of renting our other properties (zoned RLSW) on o commercial basis (as can be seeri on-line at Bob’s Lake Cottages). Further, tt’iere are frequent complaints from ofher owners in +he area of
Page 16 of 231
excessive noise from parties. music. lirevvorks. Additional development, especicilly if the infent is to rent the dwelling on a shorl term basis, will only exacerbate this issue.
A spli+ zoning of this property is inappropriate CIS it may enable further expansion of the commercial property. Wi+h the new waterfron+ access, commercial users of +he property will have access to said walerTrorit - waterfront that was riever intended for commercial
use. Addi+ionally, the portion of the property proposed to be rezoned RLSW is already being ufilized to store cl shipping container, for car parking, boat trailer parking and construction ma+erial storage, all supporting the commercial business. l am concerned that +he layout of +he new property will enable the construction of a dwelling that will irreparably damage +he enjoyment and value of my property. especiolly if construclion +akes place in jhe oreo indica+ed below (orange box). k
?
%-j (
?l
c
/
l
J
n
4?
Wl’ l
iy
F ‘?
!#
r
j
t l
l l
J l
i l l
r l
Propomed Lot Addkkm
j
% ;;J 7 r
r
r r
r
r *
f-
& t
Page 17 of 231
l do not support the re-zoning of this property for +he aforemen+ioned reasons. Please confirm receipt of +his lel1er, advise of your position (if any), and provide +he outcome of the applica+ion by email and letler mail. Sincerely, Adrian Sunderland
Page 18 of 231
From: Jennie Kapusta jkapu5ta@sout5frontenac.net Sent: February 18, 2016 9:49 AM To: Adrian Sunderland
Cc: Lindsay Mills
Subject: RE: Issacs: 216/03, Part Lot 26, Concession V; Bedford District Hi Adrian,
l have received your letter and will ensure it is forwarded to the Council members. I would also Iike to address your concerns regarding this application.
The rezoning application has been requested as a condition of the lot addition which was granted provisional consent on August 13, 2015. This is the consent application in which the map image you have included came from. This rezoning addresses only the portion of the lot between the lot addition and Burns Lane North. This section of the property is currently zoned OSP (Open Space Private) which does not permit any construction whatsoever. The )ot addition parcel is already zoned RLSW (Limited Service Residential Waterfront) which does permit construction of a seasonal or year-round dwelling. The OSP zoning was a remnant from a very old plan of subdivision which initially created these lots in the early 1970"s. This OSP zoning is also on a significant portion of your property, including part of your dwelling. You may recall our discussions on this matter last summer. So, while this rezoning will allow the construction of more buildings on the property, this rezoning is to allow them to actually be farther from your house than they otherwise would be required to be if they could only build in the lot addition parcel. Additionally, they nature of the buildings would be limited to residential dwelling and
accessory uses. At this time I have no further information with which I can provide you regarding any planned development on the property as the applicants have not indicated formally what their plans are.
I appreciate your concerns regarding the intensity of devetopment along this area of Bobs Lake, especially the environmental impact future development may have. However, as Iindicated in the first answer, this rezoning will actually allow the construction of any buildings farther back from the water than they are currently permitted. Without this rezoning the applicant would be forced into having any structures they wanted only in the Iot addition parcel as currently this is the only area zoned for more development on the property. The determination of tree species is outside my scope of expertise. While I understand butternut trees are a protected species this is not an issue over which the Township has any enforcement authority. l would direct you to discuss these concerns with the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority, the Ministry of Natural Resources, or the Ministry of the Environment. While l am not sure exactly whose jurisdiction this falls urider l am sure they will be able to direct you as to the appropriate course of action.
This section of the property is to be zoned RLSW, which is residential uses only. However, if the owner of a property chooses to rent out their entire cottage on a short-term basis they are entirely permitted to do so, as are you or any other property owriers in the Township. Our by-law does not dictate whether or not a property is able to be used for rental purposes or not. Our by-Iaw dictates the type of uses on a property, i.e. residential vs. industrial, vs. commercial. If you or any ojher residents have concerns or complaints regarding the noise generated on neighbouring properties l encourage you to contact the by-Iaw enforcement officers to make a formal complaint and they will investigate. Also, please note we have an updated version of our noise by-Iaw available in pdf. format on our website should you Iike more detailed information on noise permitted.
s.
l understand that a split zoning of a property is not an ideal situation. In this case the property is already split zoned RRC-30, OSP-4 and RLSW. The lot addition parcel is already zoned RLSW. This rezoning would actually reduce the number of different zones on the property not create the split zone issue. Additionally, this rezoning will specifically state where the commercial uses are permitted and where the residential uses are permitted. Shipping containers are permitted as accessory storage buildings under our by-law, even in residential use zones. The Township does not regulate whether or not a landowner can choose to permit people to park on their property.
The area where you are concerned about the applicant being able to construct a dwelling is already zoned to permit this, regardless of the lot addition application or the rezoning application. The Iot addition application has already been granted provisional consent to permit this portion to be added to 75 Burns Lane North. Should the applicant choose to build in this area they will be subject to all the setbacks of the RLSW zone the same as any other property. l do understand though, that the area of concern has a significant slope to it and is likely not the easiest or most likely place a person would choose to build.
Please feel free to contact me with any further questions. Reg,ards,
Jennie Kapusta Planning Assistant
Page 19 of 231
Minutes of Committee of the Whole Meeting January 26, 2016 Time: 7:00 pm Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 3 Present: Deputy Mayor Sutherland, Pat Barr, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant
Call to Order
a)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a
Scheduled Closed Session -n/a
***Recess *** - n/a
Delegations
a)
Louise Moody, North Frontenac Community Services Louise Moody reviewed the programs offered by North Frontenac Community Services that include licensed daycare, youth programming, family counseling and transportation services The cost to run a one day a week.program that includes food and supplies is $5000.00. The funding received from the Ministry of Education is primarily for their day care programs. She thanked Council for the 2015 funding which reached 66 children and is asking Council to consider funding for 2017.
b)
Deb McAuslan, re: Basic Income Guarantee Ms. McAuslan spoke to the need for a program that provides an income sufficient for life’s basic needs: welfare is a broken solution. Her presentation included data indicating the cost of poverty being $30 billion annually and $100,000 per year as the cost of managing the homeless. This is urban data.The criteria for having access to food banks is based on an intake process, in some cases people are only allowed to access the food bank every 3 months. Deputy Mayor Sutherland noted a significant increase in use of local food banks.
c)
Dave McGrath and Ron Darling, Habitat for Humanity Ron Darling reviewed his role on the land acquisition committee and noted that they are looking for property to build on in South Frontenac that needs to be close to local town centres. The organization has had positive experiences in Loyalist and Central Frontenac Townships. Dave McGrath, CEO for Habitat for Humanity explained the habitat model that provides affordable home ownership, allowing families with modest income to have their own homes. There is a process to qualify, the homes are not given
Page 20 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 away, but a third party assessment determines the mortgage amount with 0% interest. Home owners are not considered clients but partners as they volunteer 500 hours as part of the qualifying process. Council discussed the failed tax sale process as an opportunity for building lots. Councillor Sleeth thanked Mr. McGrath and Mr. Darling for attending and providing information on this program. d)
Fran Willes, re: Harrowsmith Rezoning and Hartington Subdivision Mrs. Willes withdrew her request for delegation status.
e)
Pat Lalonde With the consent of Council, Ms. Lalonde was added to the agenda. Ms. Lalonde offered her views on the minutes of settlement for the Larcon property. She recognized that the OMB decision is theirs to make but felt changes to the Official Plan are needed to ensure that industrial and commercial zoning is better defined. She stated that people who move to the country don’t want to be near commercial and industrial development.
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Investment Policy Council supported and directed this item to be brought forward.
b)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Housekeeping Amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Mr. Mills reviewed his report and noted that the Boy Scouts Camp on Massassauga Road is to be included in the housekeeping by-law although it had not been identified in his report. A copy of the Chief Building Official’s opinion on the proposed housekeeping changes were circulated to Council. Councillor Revill was not supportive of the CBO’s opinion. Council questioned the interpretation of front yard with respect to public roads and private lanes. Council felt it should be the same. Mr. Mills explained that on a private lane where the property is on a water body, the front yard is considered the water frontage. Council was supportive of moving forwards to a public meeting for the housekeeping by-law.
c)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Comments on County of Frontenac Official Plan Discussion took place regarding Section 4.2.1.6 Private Services and the implications for South Frontenac with respect to development in all hamlets and on-site septic systems and private wells. Mr. Mills interpretation was that the province is directing development to the settlement areas but, on the other
Page 2 of 4
Page 21 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 hand, they are not allowing us to do it since no settlement area in the County has these full services. Council felt this should be clarified and was too significant to ignore. Staff were directed to appeal the County Official Plan if written clarification could not be obtained from the Ministry. d)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance, Concessions V and VI, Part of Lot 19, Ritchie Council was supportive of moving this forward.
e)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Process Map for Subdivision/Condominium Development It was recognized that there is no clear one line process with respect to the process. Wayne Orr suggested that the upcoming organizational review will provide a benchmark and best practices. There is still further dialog anticipated in developing the flowchart. This has been provided to Council as an update.
Reports for Information - n/a
Rise & Report
a)
County Council The CAO reported that the County Planner has submitted a report to County Council regarding an opinion on the Johnston Point development. He was not certain when this will be taken to County Council.
b)
Arena Board There was increased revenue from what had been projected for 2015. Changes in the financial operations are being made. There will be tenders for arena lighting and new compressors. It is anticipated that this work will be completed after the current season.
c)
Police Services Board The first meeting of 2016 is scheduled for March 17.
Information Items
a)
Community Letter, re: Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Portland District - Proposed Subdivision Development
b)
Ruth Gultekin, 4023 Boyce Rd, re: Hartington Revised Plan of Subdivision Recommendations to County Council
c)
Mara Shaw, Executive Director, Loving Spoonful, re: Submission of Good Food, A Community Consultation and Plan
Page 3 of 4
Page 22 of 231 Committee of the Whole January 26, 2016 d)
Doug Reycroft, MEPCO, Board Chair, re: OMERS Plan Benefits
e)
John Bolognone, City Clerk, City of Kingston, re: Basic Income Guarantee (carried forward from January 12 agenda)
Notice of Motions
a)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland served notice of motion to bring forward a modified version of the City of Kingston request for Basic Income Guarantee for support.
Announcements
a)
Councillor Sleeth questioned the status of the Amey property and the latest information received about Hartington. The Planner will be proceeding with advertising for the sale of the township property. Once information is received in writing, the information regarding the Hartington site will be provided in a report to Council.
b)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland requested that staff follow up on loans or grants for energy retrofit projects.
c)
Interviews for the Organizational Review have been scheduled. Anyone with conflicts or changes need to contact Angela Maddocks.
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
Closed Session - n/a
Adjournment
a)
The meeting adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
Page 4 of 4
Page 23 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 4 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.
Call to Order
a)
Resolution Resolution No. 2016-4-1 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT the Council meeting of February 2, 2016 be called to order at 7:00 p.m. Carried
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a
Scheduled Closed Session - n/a
Recess - n/a
Public Meeting - n/a
Approval of Minutes
a)
January 19, 2016 Council Meeting Resolution No. 2016-4-2 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council approves the minutes of the January 19, 2016 Council meeting. Carried
Business Arising from the Minutes
a)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Larcon - Minutes of Settlement Resolution No. 2016-4-3 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council approve the minutes of settlement as attached to the staff report dated January 27, 2016 AND instruct the Township solicitor to settle the OMB appeal on these terms. Carried
b)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Basic Income Guarantee Resolution No. 2016-4-4
Page 24 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council endorse the resolution attached to this report and circulate Council’s support to AMO, FCM and provincial and federal governments as an endorsement for a national discussion on a Basic Income Guarantee for all Canadians. Carried c)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Cataraqui Trail Management Board Composition Council consensus was that two community representatives and one Council member was adequate representation on the board.Deputy Mayor Sutherland will remain on the board and an amending by-law will be brought forward to the next Council meeting.
d)
Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Investment Policy See By-law 2016-05
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing Resolution No. 2016-4-5 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Robinson THAT Council receives for information the Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing dated February 2, 2016 in the amount of $643,711.04. Carried
b)
Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Insurance Renewal Extension Resolution No. 2016-4-6 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council extend the current insurance policy expiry date from June 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016. Carried
c)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW-2016-01 - 2016 Surface Treatment Program Resolution No. 2016-4-7 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council approves the bid of Smiths Construction Company for the supply and application of the Township’s Surface Treatment in the amount of $898,118.15 including all applicable taxes. Carried
d)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager,r e: Tender # PW-2016-03 - Purchase of One (1) 2016 4 X 4 Backhoe Resolution No. 2016-4-8
Page 2 of 6
Page 25 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approve the submission from Hartington Equipment, for Tender PW-2016-03, 2016 model 580 SN WT 4 X 4 Backhoe, in the amount of $134,976.37, inclusive of HST. Carried e)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: AVL for Fire Chief’s Vehicle Resolution No. 2016-4-9 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT Council adopt the recommendation of the Public Services Committee and direct staff to purchase and install AVL equipment on the Fire Chief’s vehicle. AND THAT if the cost of the additional installation does not fall within the $100,000.00 approved for this capital budget item that the incremental funds for this installation come from the working funds reserve. Carried
f)
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Appointment of Acting Chief Building Official See By-law 2016-04
Committee Meeting Minutes
a)
Corporate Services Committee meeting held December 18, 2015 Councillor Schjerning questioned the status of Item 3 (F) the Communication Customer Service Policy that Council has requested sometime ago.
b)
Loughborough District Recreation meeting held November 30, 2015 With respect to The Point Park and the comprehensive plan for improvements, it was agreed that the Council rep would have this reviewed at the district level with recommendations to go to South Frontenac Recreation. Resolution No. 2016-4-10 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT Council receives for information the minutes of the following committee meetings: Loughborough District Recreation meeting held November 30, 2015 Corporate Services Committee meeting held December 18, 2015 Carried
By-Laws
a)
By-law 2016-04 - Appoint Acting Chief Building Official Resolution No. 2016-4-11 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT the following by-laws be given first and second reading: By-law 2016-04
Page 3 of 6
Page 26 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016
By-law 2016-05 Carried
Resolution No. 2016-4-12 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-04, being a by-law to appoint an acting Chief Building Official be given third reading signed and sealed. Carried b)
By-law 2016-05 - Investment Policy Resolution No. 2016-4-13 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-05, being a by-law to adopt a municipal investment policy be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried
Reports for Information
a)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Housekeeping Amendment to Zoning by-law: Review by Chief Building Official and Planning Comments
b)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Clarification of Frontenac County Official Plan modifications
c)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager re: Tender # PW-2016-04 - Purchase of One (1) Half Ton Extended Cab 4 X 4 Pick Up Truck
d)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender #PW-2016-05- Purchase of One (1) 2016 Model Half Ton Crew Cab Truck
e)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW-2016-06 Purchase of Two (2) 2016 Model 3/4 Ton Trucks with Plow Equipment
f)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender # PW -2016-07-Purchase of One (1) 2600 Gallon Water Tank
Information Items
a)
Kevin Morrison, Mayor, Town of Goderich, re: Annual Ontario Small Urban Municipalities Conference and Trade Show
b)
Debra McAuslan - Basic Income Guarantee presentation - follow up
c)
Kelly Pender, CAO, County of Frontenac, re: Johnston Point Plan of Vacant Condominium
d)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Township jurisdiction over docks
e)
Alexia Touralias, Director, Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, re: CIP 150 application
f)
Carole Fuller, Allan & Partners. Chartered Profession Accountants, re: Audit Planning Report for year ending December 31, 2015
Page 4 of 6
Page 27 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 13.
Notice of Motions
a)
Deputy Mayor Sutherland - Notice of Motion, re: Agenda Item 12 (c) Council was supportive of Deputy Mayor Sutherland tabling the following resolutions. Resolution No. 2016-4-14 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT South Frontenac inform the County of Frontenac that all studies and reports concerning Johnston Point have been released in Open Session. Carried Resolution No. 2016-4-15 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT South Frontenac has significant concerns with approving waterfront lots in close proximity to provincially significant wetlands. Carried
Announcements
a)
Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, announced that Anderson Road should be open to traffic by the end of this week.
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)
a)
Pat Lalonde asked for clarification on the Agenda Item 7(a) and the planning process moving forward for the lot addition. Wayne Orr provided details on the original application, the OMB appeal process and clarity on the process to date.
b)
With respect to Agenda Item 12 (c), Fran Willes asked for clarification on closed sessions regarding Johnston Point. She noted that there was speculation of closed meetings being held in Kingston. Wayne Orr confirmed that closed sessions include all of Council and whomever they invite to attend. Closed Sessions only take place on Tuesdays, the same evening as Council and Committee of the Whole meetings and are held in the meeting room at the township office.
Closed Session - n/a
Confirmatory By-law
a)
By-law 2016-06 Resolution No. 2016-4-16 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-06 being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac, be given first and second reading this 2 day of February 2016. Carried Resolution No. 2016-4-17
Page 5 of 6
Page 28 of 231 Minutes of Council February, 2, 2016 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-06, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading, signed and sealed this 2 day of February, 2016. Carried 18.
Adjournment
a)
Resolution Resolution No. 2016-4-18 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT the Council meeting of February 2, 2016 be adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Carried
Ron Vandewal, Mayor
Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer
Page 6 of 6
Page 29 of 231
Minutes of Committee of the Whole Meeting February 9, 2016 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 5 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Norm Roberts, Bill Robinson, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, LIndsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.
Call to Order
a)
Mayor Vandewal called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
Scheduled Closed Session - n/a
Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a
Recess - n/a
Delegations
a)
Reid Shepherd and Anne Marie Young, County of Frontenac, re: Harrowsmith CIP An overview of the Community Improvement Plan for Harrowsmith was provided by Mr. Shepherd and Ms. Young.on behalf of the County of Frontenac. The Township benefits include stimulating development and economic activity, enhanced appearance of commercial buildings, help to ensure safety and accessibility and property tax revenues. Public consultations will be scheduled in the near future.
b)
Kevin Riley, Utilities Kingston, re: Sydenham Water Annual Report Mr. Riley spoke to the report included in the agenda package. He noted that there were no problems in 2015 and plant operations ran smoothly. Council will provide confirmation of receiving the reports by resolution on February 16.
c)
Jim Miller and Katie Morrow, Utilities Kingston, re: Water Capacity Ms. Morrow and Mr. Miller reviewed their presentation with Council and explained how water capacity of the plant is calculated based on MOE guidelines and current consumption. The original design of the treatment plant used a conservative approach for estimating flows and the factors that impact the calculation of committed and uncommitted capacity are the residential density and per person water use. Further assessment will be undertaken.
Reports Requiring Action
a)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Proposal to Demolish and Rebuild Cottage within 30 metres of Loughborough Lake, Concession XI, Pt Lot 4, Storrington District Council supported the Planner’s interpretation on this request; if the cottage is demolished it can’t be built on the same footprint as there is room on the lot to rebuild and meet the minimum setbacks of the current zoning by-law.
Page 30 of 231 Committee of the Whole February 9, 2016
b)
Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance in between Lots 18 & 19 and Concessions VIII and IX, Storrington District Council was supportive of closing and selling the road allowance provided that the remaining land-locked piece of road allowance is sold to the abutting landowners at the same time.
Reports for Information - n/a
Rise & Report
a)
Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority No update.
b)
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority The January 28 meeting dealt with the appointments of Chair and Vice Chair and other necessary business.
c)
Quinte Region Conservation Authority The QRCA are trying to buy property across from their offices in Belleville.
d)
Portland Heritage No update.
Information Items
a)
Rob McRae, Watershed Planning Coordinator, re: Request for Input-Source Protection Committee
b)
Dawn E. Clarke, Chair, Seeley’s Bay United Church of Canada, re: Save a Family from Syria sponsorship
c)
Township Letter re: Resolution endorsement for Basic Income Guarantee
d)
Township Letter, re: Johnston Point Reports and Provincially Significant Wetlands
e)
Around the Rideau - January/February 2016 Newsletter
f)
Frontenac Community Arena - Free Public Skating through Healthy Community Challenge.
Notice of Motions - n/a
Announcements
a)
The recent employee emergency at the Public Works garage was noted and Council requested that those who provided first response should be commended.
Page 2 of 3
Page 31 of 231 Committee of the Whole February 9, 2016 b)
Councillor Schjerning asked about township facilities that have an AED and what training has been provided for these units. Wayne Orr noted that both the Keeley Road and George Street offices have a defib on site and staff are trained to use. There is also a unit installed at the Bedford Hall and the Storrington Centre, however only local users of the facilities have been trained to use. A unit is also installed at the community arena.
Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items) - n/a
Closed Session- n/a
Adjournment
a)
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Page 3 of 3
Page 32 of 231
STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council:
February 10, 2016
Agenda Date:
March 1, 2016
SUBJECT: Cataraqui Trail Management Board RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve By-law 2016-07 which removes Councillor McDougall from the Cataraqui Trail Management Board. BACKGROUND: At the January 29, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting Deputy Mayor Sutherland sought clarification on the composition of the Cataraqui Trail Management Board. At the February 2, 2016 Council meeting, Council agreed that it was only necessary to have one Council member appointed to the board. By-law 2014-71 passed on December 16, 2014 appointed Council members to various boards and committees. An amending By-law (2016-07) is included in the agenda package and removes Councillor McDougall as a representative to the Cataraqui Trail Management Board; all other appointments remain the same.
Submitted/approved by:
Prepared by:
Wayne Orr CAO
Angela Maddocks Executive Assistant
Page 33 of 231
Payment Listing For the period of February 3, 2016 to February 16, 2016
Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of February 3, 2016 to February 16, 2016
2,071,800.79
Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #3
Pay date February 3, 2016 For the period of January 17, 2016 to January 30, 2016
Council Reimbursement
Pay date February 3, 2016
Total Payments
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending February 16, 2016 in the amount of
$
2,151,810.08
Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer
79,001.49 1,007.80
$
2,151,810.08
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
Ranges: Cheque Date:
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
9:59:13 AM
From: 2/3/2016
To: 2/16/2016
Page:
1
Page 34 of 231
Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC
10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000004992
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
D23165
DIAMOND MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS INC. ANNUAL SUPPORT RENEWAL
60152 60239
THE FRONTENAC NEWS AD JAN 28 AD FEB 4
3715763
METROLAND MEDIA GROUP ADVERTISING
Total EFT000000004992 EFT000000005003 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005003 EFT000000005025 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005025
Total Gen
Amount $19,262.91 $19,262.91 $391.68 $418.44 $810.12 $1,379.87 $1,379.87
$21,452.90
0020 TaxC Cheque EFT000000004985
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC 2015 YEAR END REC 2015 YEAR END REC 45002 4TH QTR LEVY 2015
Total EFT000000004985
Total TaxC
Amount $36,616.05 $1,250,487.75 $1,287,103.80
$1,287,103.80
1000 Cheque 067262
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
2/16/2016 028496
Total 067263 EFT000000004989
Amount
A-1 LOCKSMITHS 954359
Total 067262 067263
Description
2/16/2016
DRILL OPEN LOCK BOX ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE HX CAP
$739.74 $739.74 $2.22 $2.22
CULLIGAN 0912214
culligan water
106142
NETWORK SECURITY SYSTEMS JAN-DEC 2016 MONITORING
56878
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE wheel x 2
50351 50351
XCG CONSULTANTS LTD. DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING
Total EFT000000004989 EFT000000005028 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005028 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005057 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005057
Total
$123.70 $123.70 $244.22 $244.22 $71.21 $71.21 $101.76 $101.76 $203.52
$1,384.61
1100 Counc Cheque EFT000000005043
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005046
Description
00005332
SOUTHERN FRONTENAC COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING COSTS
10096 310
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND Food for org review FOOD FOR ORG REVIEW
Total EFT000000005043 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016
Total Counc
Vendor
Amount $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $38.97 $7.99 $46.96
$10,046.96
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
2
Page 35 of 231
1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000004985
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
44999
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC EAP - DEC 2015
10017 3093 5504 5494
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND coffee/cream cream CREAM CREAM
Total EFT000000004985 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005046
Total Clk
Amount $209.63 $209.63 $28.05 $2.69 $8.07 $4.39 $43.20
$252.83
1275 Fin Cheque 067267 Total 067267 067268 Total 067268 EFT000000004994
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
10243
BUSINESS MACHINES SERVICE CENTRE TWO DRAWER KEYS
404264
CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS OF CANADA PUBLIC SECTOR HANDBOOK
0062
DIXON ACTUARIAL SERVICES actuarial valuation
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
Total EFT000000004994
Amount $18.32 $18.32 $96.67 $96.67 $2,849.28 $2,849.28
Total Fin
$2,964.27
Total GG
$1,323,205.37
20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067266 Total 067266 067278 Total 067278 067279 Total 067279 067287
Total 067287 EFT000000004970
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Description
V00966
BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) tower rental feb 2016
16/01/15-GAS
NEW TOPPERS MARKET FIRETRUCK GAS
4222
NORTH COUNTRY MARINE PROP & SPARE TIRE/RIMS
15/12/29-27 15/12/29-26 16/01-31 16/01-32
VOTARY, RICHARD DEC 29 PLOWING DEC 29 PLOWING JAN SNOW REMOVAL - FIRE ACCESS JAN SNOW REMOVAL
21733 21762 21763
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. HOLDING TANK PUMPED SNOWPLOWING 8 @ $50 snowplowing 8 @ $50
01426287
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL JAN 2016
135368
ALLIED MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INC quick combo ready pads
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000004971 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004971 EFT000000004973 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004973 EFT000000004980 2/16/2016
Amount $295.38 $295.38 $621.40 $621.40 $448.20 $448.20 $65.00 $65.00 $260.00 $260.00 $650.00 $223.87 $407.04 $407.04 $1,037.95 $34.53 $34.53 $279.23 $279.23
CANADIAN TIRE 122392
Total EFT000000004980 EFT000000004982 2/16/2016 195642 195641 195438 Total EFT000000004982
Vendor
extension cords CHRISTIE & WALTHER clean metal debris from speake shop rate to check radio BELT CLIPS
$130.81 $130.81 $50.88 $50.88 $20.94 $122.70
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
EFT000000004997
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2/16/2016
Page:
3
Page 36 of 231
DRAPER DOORS 9012
Total EFT000000004997 EFT000000004999 2/16/2016
MOVE AIR HOSE
432904
FIRE SERVICE MANAGEMENT WASH SUIT & REPAIRS
16/01-12
GREENSLADE, DONALD JAN 2016 PLOWING
Total EFT000000004999 EFT000000005007 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005007 EFT000000005009 2/16/2016
$162.82 $162.82 $63.08 $63.08 $500.00 $500.00
HUGHSON, KENT 0300 0170
Total EFT000000005009 EFT000000005013 2/16/2016 KS15672 KS15414 Total EFT000000005013 EFT000000005017 2/16/2016
PLOW/SAND SNOWPLOWING/SANDING KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON AIR LEAK SAFETY INSPECTION
$900.53 $193.34 $1,093.87 $235.08 $179.91 $414.99
LEONARD FUELS 3935-673853 3935-677539 4896-672892 2706-672907 4896-676949 2706-677040 1687-672691 1687-676950 1057-676542 1057-676545 1057-680837 1057-679550 1057-679551 1057-675213 1057-675212 1057-677811 1057-677812 1057-58012 0647-675022 0647-677380 0647-677480 0647-681417
Total EFT000000005017 EFT000000005018 2/16/2016
452.3 L @ $.641 350.8 L @ $.594 383.2 L @ $0.652 435.2 L @ $0.652 712.3 L @ $.594 556.9 L @ $.588 302.8 L @ $0.652 814.4 L @ $0.594 59 L @ $0.8841 85.69 L @ $0.9195 80.08 L @ $0.8841 131.8 L @ $0.610 559.1 L @ $0.610 645 L @ $0.628 207.5 L @ $0.628 139 L @ $ 0.602 386.8 L @ $0.602 FURANCE BELT AND SERVICE 739.1 L @ $0.654 1101.5 L @ $0.8731 1212 L @ $0.610 958.1 L @ $0.856
16/01/14-37
LEONARD, ELIZABETH CLEANING FIREHALL
53567708 53570042
LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 Oxygen Oxygen
15/12/08-11 15/12/15-15
NELLIE’S GAS BAR DIESEL 72.042 L REG GAS
11279
NORTHWAY HARDWARE batteries/shovel/air ftting
Total EFT000000005018 EFT000000005020 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005020 EFT000000005027 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005027 EFT000000005029 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005029 EFT000000005037 2/16/2016
$295.02 $212.05 $254.25 $288.74 $430.56 $333.22 $200.91 $492.26 $51.88 $78.44 $70.42 $81.81 $347.06 $412.19 $132.60 $85.15 $236.95 $101.38 $491.88 $978.64 $752.35 $834.56 $7,162.32 $60.00 $60.00 $320.00 $26.85 $346.85 $68.44 $68.44 $136.88 $53.24 $53.24
PUROLATOR INC. 430148523
Total EFT000000005037 EFT000000005044 2/16/2016
SHIPPING CHARGES
9747055
SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 675.5 L @ $0.7914
K540208 K539960
SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED CLEANING SUPPLIES GARBAGE BAGS
2488
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND VEGGIE TRAY
56564
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE propane tanks
Total EFT000000005044 EFT000000005045 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005045 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005046 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016
$68.31 $68.31 $564.14 $564.14 $164.85 $119.57 $284.42 $25.43 $25.43 $69.60
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 17026
Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005048 2/16/2016
Page:
4
Page 37 of 231
GAR BAGS
$26.45 $96.05
electrical repairs
$425.97 $425.97
TRUE ELECTRIC 6677
Total EFT000000005048 EFT000000005049 2/16/2016 149799
TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR CRACKED SCREEN
195763
WESTPORT HOME HARDWARE FIRE SUPPLIES
Total EFT000000005049 EFT000000005053 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005053
Total Fire
$228.96 $228.96 $40.39 $40.39
$15,347.92
2200 911 Cheque 067276
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES CERB 911 annual billing
Amount
Total 067276
$8,666.89 $8,666.89
Total 911
$8,666.89
17200116065
2400 Police Cheque EFT000000005043
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 00005326
Vendor
Description
SOUTHERN FRONTENAC COMMUNITY CATERING SALT MEETING
Total EFT000000005043
Total Police
Amount $528.00 $528.00
$528.00
2625 Lvstck Cheque 067282 Total 067282 067288
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
Vendor
REDDEN, LARRY 151216-BULLCALF 121216 BULL CALF
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
Amount $805.00 $805.00
ORSER, ELWOOD 151213LAMB
Total 067288 067289
Description
151213 LAMB KILL
WILSON ROGER DAVID 151217CROSS STEER 151217CROSS STEER
$250.00 $250.00
Total 067289
$1,092.00 $1,092.00
Total Lvstck
$2,147.00
2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005002
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-B-2015-DECEMBER 630 K @ $0.52/KM SF-B-2015-DECEMBER 46 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2015-DECEMBER 1200 km @ $.52/km SF-P-2015-DECEMBER 20 hrs @ $22.50
Total EFT000000005002
Amount $295.01 $932.05 $634.98 $457.92 $2,319.96
Total Bylaw enf
$2,319.96
Total PP&P
$29,009.77
30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067261
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Total 067263 EFT000000004972
Description
Amount
407 ETR 15/12/18
Total 067261 067263
Vendor
2/16/2016
407 useage
027236
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE LUMBER
C14258-0216
ALLIANCE WIRELESS ANSWERING SERVICE
2/16/2016
$14.17 $14.17 $121.40 $121.40 $208.92
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Total EFT000000004972 EFT000000005005 2/16/2016
Page:
5
Page 38 of 231 $208.92
J245715 J288565 J290059 J270000 J278149
GRAND & TOY LIMITED office supplies desk pad binder clips labels office supplies
EPT000813
LOCAL AUTHORITY SERVICES LTD. ENERGY PLANNING 2016
Total EFT000000005005 EFT000000005021 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005021
Total PW OH
$142.73 $47.07 $3.53 $13.20 $127.29 $333.82 $254.40 $254.40
$932.71
3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067266 Total 067266 067277 Total 067277 067284
Total 067284 EFT000000005005
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
V00966
BELL MOBILITY (RADIO DIVISION) tower rental feb 2016
0912949
MUNICIPAL RISK SERVICES LIMITED ROADS WORKSHOP x 3
11099743 2010446
SKILLPATH SEMINARS MANGEMENT TRAINING B KIRK HANDBOOK FOR MANAGERS
J296795
GRAND & TOY LIMITED EASEL/ INKJET / PROF PHOTO
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005005
Total RdAdmOH
Amount $295.38 $295.38 $424.34 $424.34 $304.26 $39.10 $343.36 $476.18 $476.18
$1,539.26
3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067263
Total 067263 067265 Total 067265 067270 Total 067270 067273 Total 067273 067275
Total 067275 067280
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE supplies 2x12x8 - 3 36 CEILING TILES lumber lumber and plywood
0094337006
BELL CANADA C/O SPECIAL BILLING RELOCATE FOR BELL SERVICES
0072840
EQUIPEMENTS LOURDS PAPINEAU INC PUSH ARM REPLACEMENT
977209
HEAT DESIGN EQUIPMENT IGNITION KIT / SOLENOID
5300233121 5300231802 5300232046 5300226728 5300229865 5300227107 5300226660
K+S WINDSOR SALT LTD 85.93 T @ $84.74 SALT 32.37 T @ $84.74 SALT 37.03 T @ $84.74 SALT 79.16 T @ $84.74 SALT 39.24 T @ $84.74 SALT 42.83 T @ $84.74 SALT 37.72 T @ $84.74 SALT
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
Amount $56.93 $71.74 $219.43 $55.57 $245.13 $648.80 $10,997.54 $10,997.54 $1,093.92 $1,093.92 $388.72 $388.72 $7,409.86 $2,791.31 $3,193.15 $6,826.08 $3,383.72 $3,693.30 $3,252.65 $30,550.07
O. BETTSCHEN
2/16/2016 16-165660
Total 067281
Description
028100 027780 028102 026817 028110
36321 36287 36307 36307 36311 Total 067280 067281
Vendor
21.77 T 5/8” @ $7.90 40.69 T 5/8" @ $7.90 22.26 T 5/8" @ $7.90 106.42 T 3" @ $7.50 78.83 T 5/8" @ $7.90 ONTARIO AGGREGATE RESOURCES SAND & GRAVEL FEE 2015
$175.01 $327.11 $178.95 $812.20 $633.71 $2,126.98 $534.75 $534.75
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
067283 Total 067283 067285
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2/16/2016
SHELLEY HOME IMPROVEMENTS LUNCHROOM BALANCE DUE + EXTRAS
2/16/2016
2/16/2016
STORRINGTON TAMDEM RENTAL
24191955
BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS FIRST AID KIT
16090594 91634686
BENSON TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR SPRING LEAF SPRING
787601
BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS CHAIN OIL
Total EFT000000004975 EFT000000004976 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000004976 EFT000000004977 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004977 EFT000000004980 2/16/2016
Page 39 of 231 $9,468.77 $9,468.77 $954.00 $954.00 $56.30 $56.30 $461.51 $241.12 $702.63 $64.92 $64.92
CANADIAN TIRE 121432
Total EFT000000004980 EFT000000004981 2/16/2016 024692 Total EFT000000004981 EFT000000004983 2/16/2016
TAPE,LADDER,POWEBAR CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT SKYHAWK
$129.69 $129.69 $39.69 $39.69
CINTAS 884707502 884707502 884707502
Total EFT000000004983 EFT000000004984 2/16/2016
supplies mark harrington uniform cory gemmill uniform
$116.52 $13.29 $9.50 $139.31
HOSE AND NOZZLE PARTS
$789.97 $789.97
CLEAN ONTARIO 53964
Total EFT000000004984 EFT000000004986 2/16/2016 15108
CRAINS’ CONSTRUCTION LTD. BELLROCK VILLAGE
7058
D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING 22 BUSHINGS
09613
D.M. WILLS ASSOCIATES LIMITED MASSASSAUGA RD CULVERT
Total EFT000000004986 EFT000000004995 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004995 EFT000000004996 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000004996 EFT000000004998 2/16/2016
$499,865.32 $499,865.32 $452.83 $452.83 $465.55 $465.55
EVERTEMP INC 28483
Total EFT000000004998 EFT000000005000 2/16/2016
RAN PIPING FOR PROPANE
$3,154.87 $3,154.87
FISH, DOROTHY 5912
Total EFT000000005000 EFT000000005004 2/16/2016
5 CLEANS @ $75.00
35468
GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC PARTS FOR F53
15109
THE GREER GALLOWAY GROUP INC Engineer consulting dec 2015
INV106601737 INV106632928 INV106640779 INV106644855
HD SUPPLY CANADA, INC BLACK SPRAY PAINT TOOLS - HAMMER DRILL, GRINDER CHAINS EXT CORDS
P21055
JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC. BOLTS
847113685
KAL TIRE ONTARIO REPLACE BROKEN SPRING
9303811213 9303811214 9303839134
KENT AUTOMOTIVE CABLE TIES MISC PARTS COTTER PIN
Total EFT000000005004 EFT000000005006 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005006 EFT000000005008 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005008 EFT000000005010 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005010 EFT000000005011 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005011 EFT000000005012 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005012 EFT000000005015 2/16/2016
6
SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/08-01
Total 067285 EFT000000004975
Page:
KWIK LOAD PRODUCTS LTD.
$375.00 $375.00 $650.35 $650.35 $441.72 $441.72 $71.52 $698.85 $659.14 $112.16 $1,541.67 $32.46 $32.46 $208.69 $208.69 $414.61 $274.99 $40.46 $730.06
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT KININV002269
Total EFT000000005015 EFT000000005017 2/16/2016
REMOTE STARTER INSTALL
967 L @ $.623 1 CASE ROTELLA LUBES 12 10W30 LUBES 83.4 L @ $0.8841 72.01 L @ $0.8841 91.44 L @ $0.8841 92.01 L @ $0.8841 107 L @ $0.8841 73.01 L @ $0.8575 109.52 L @ $0.8575 84.62 L @ $0.8575 108.02 L @ $0.8575 96.50 L @ $0.8398 95.01 L @ $08398 & LUBE 83.01 L @ $0.8398 105.51 L @ $0.8398 90.54 L @ $0.8310 87.24 L @ $0.8221 88 L @ $.8221 8 L @ $0.9460 78.4 L @ $0.7956 82.43 L @ $0.7956 58 L @ $0.7956 1469.1 L @ $0.610 965 L @ $.628
LEONARD, ELIZABETH 2016/01/29-36 5 CLEANS @ $75.00 CLEANINGSUPPLIES cleaning supplies
Total EFT000000005018 EFT000000005019 2/16/2016 DAR 21033045
LIEBHERR CANADA LTD BLOCK HEATER
53527112 53559152 53559159 53570220
LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 WIRE MIG / TIP CUTTING Oxygen ACETYLENE/OXYGEN ACETYLENE/OXYGEN
199152 198091
MCKEOWN AND WOOD FUELS 2857.7 L @ $.6170 2471.1 L @ $.6200
Total EFT000000005019 EFT000000005020 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005020 EFT000000005023 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005023 EFT000000005024 2/16/2016
7
Page 40 of 231 $604.33 $604.33
LEONARD FUELS 0646-675021 1056-676693 1056-678594 1058-676739 1058-675888 1058-676988 1058-677333 1058-677602 1058-677835 1058-678110 1058-678359 1058-678675 1058-679147 1058-679492 1058-679652 1058-680578 1058-680844 1058-681120 1058-681170 1058-681170 1058-681429 1058-681651 1058-681779 1058-677814 1058-675487
Total EFT000000005017 EFT000000005018 2/16/2016
Page:
MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 2016/01/29-ANDERSON ANDERSON RD WORK
Total EFT000000005024 EFT000000005026 2/16/2016 896-733276
NAPA UNIVERSAL SUPPLY GROUP CUT OFF WHEEL
A13668 A13072
PAT ROGERS TOWING SERVICE Towing service Towing service
0000128358 0000128256
PAT’S RADIATOR SERVICE LTD. throttle repair HOSE ASSEMBLY
Total EFT000000005026 EFT000000005032 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005032 EFT000000005033 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005033 EFT000000005034 2/16/2016
$680.76 $829.12 $48.84 $73.33 $63.32 $80.40 $80.91 $94.09 $62.23 $93.34 $72.12 $92.06 $80.51 $83.06 $69.25 $88.01 $74.71 $71.21 $71.82 $7.69 $61.88 $65.05 $45.77 $911.92 $616.69 $4,518.09 $375.00 $16.26 $391.26 $212.38 $212.38 $154.37 $11.19 $23.00 $204.13 $392.69 $1,794.23 $1,559.04 $3,353.27 $19,003.68 $19,003.68 $32.80 $32.80 $178.08 $508.80 $686.88 $301.53 $67.65 $369.18
PETRIE FORD 206639 206639
Total EFT000000005034 EFT000000005035 2/16/2016
SEAL BEAM / LED LIGHT BULB SEAL BEAM
76077
PRINTFUSION INC. DRIVING SHEET FORMS
173-100686 173-100971
QUINTE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS BATTERY CABLES LED STROBE
Total EFT000000005035 EFT000000005038 2/16/2016
$64.47 $19.31 $83.78 $376.51 $376.51 $208.47 $302.54
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 173-107199 173-106002 173-105031
Total EFT000000005038 EFT000000005039 2/16/2016
MODEL 10 SURGE 20K LED 4 STOP TAIL RELAY & CONNECTOR
2432349
RIGNEY BUILDING SUPPLIES door X 2
868 140 1030
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND WATER WATER BEDFORD KICTHEN SUPPLIES
69689 56269 56646 56636 56793 56611 56446 56238 56948 200557
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 10 ROUND NOSE SHOVELS HOSE NOZZLE wheelbarrow EYE,HOOK, FASTENERS SHOP SUPPLIES rust paint Kitchen supplies paint & brushes CORD SIGN ROOM STOCK
148180
TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS CANVAS CASE
0000123351 0000123351
WHITE’S WEARPARTS LTD PLOW PARTS PLOW PARTS
Total EFT000000005039 EFT000000005046 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005046 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005049 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005049 EFT000000005055 2/16/2016
Page:
8
Page 41 of 231 $830.16 $81.81 $28.88 $1,451.86 $201.48 $201.48 $39.90 $23.94 $60.31 $124.15 $203.52 $10.17 $237.07 $38.59 $67.13 $22.25 $76.87 $23.93 $15.25 $131.87 $826.65 $30.52 $30.52
Total EFT000000005055
$906.09 $906.08 $1,812.17
Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl
$601,076.26
3210 Brushing Cheque EFT000000004993
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
DIG’N DIRT LTD. 104494
Total EFT000000004993 EFT000000005016 2/16/2016 30134
FLOAT EXCAVATOR L.D. POWER SPORTS CHAIN & BAR
Total EFT000000005016
Total Brushing
$445.20 $445.20 $230.86 $230.86
$676.06
3215 Drainage Cheque 067280
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Amount
O. BETTSCHEN 36359 36321 36321 36286 36286 36307 36307
Total 067280 EFT000000004993
Description
2/16/2016
70.72 T 5/8 @ $7.90 10.78 T 5/8" @ $7.90 64.59 T blased rubble @ $6.50 57.90 T 5/8" @ $7.90 82.94 T 3" @ $7.50 12.33 T 5/8" @ $7.90 12.24 T 3" @ $7.50
$568.52 $86.66 $427.23 $465.46 $633.03 $99.12 $93.41 $2,373.43
DIG’N DIRT LTD. 104493
FLOAT EXCAVATOR
Total EFT000000004993
Total Drainage
$254.40 $254.40
$2,627.83
3320 should maint Cheque EFT000000004988
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION SHOULDERING
Amount
Total EFT000000004988
$32,043.87 $32,043.87
Total should maint
$32,043.87
90056724
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
9
Page 42 of 231
3405 Washout Cheque 067280
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
O. BETTSCHEN 36285 36329
10.65 T RAP @ $9.00 20.1 T RAP @ $9.00
Total 067280
Total Washout
$97.54 $184.08 $281.62
$281.62
3502 Winter Prop Damage Cheque EFT000000005047
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 56342
Vendor
Description
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 24 mail boxes
Total EFT000000005047
Total Winter Prop Damage
Amount $488.20 $488.20
$488.20
3505 Snw Plwng Cheque 067274 Total 067274 EFT000000004970
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
Description
HOGAN’S SUNRISE SNOWPLOWING INC 16/01 PLOWING JAN16-29 PLOWING / SANDING
2/16/2016 21758
Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000005024 2/16/2016
Vendor
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 49.5 HRS @ $72.50
MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 16/01-NEW RD 16/01-NEW RD 16/01-WHITE RD 16/01-WHITE RD 16/01-HENRY RD 16/01-HENRY RD 16/01-BUNKER HILL RD 16/01-BUNKER HILL RD 16/01-DEYO RD 16/01-DEYO RD 16/01 - JAMES WILSON 16/01 - JAMES WILSON 16/01 - TIMMERMAN 16/01 - TIMMERMAN 16/01 - LINDA LORD 16/01 - LINDA LORD
Total EFT000000005024
Total Snw Plwng
Amount $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,651.91 $3,651.91 $1,495.87 $1,048.13 $1,032.86 $1,780.80 $2,065.73 $1,780.80 $691.97 $1,979.23 $11,875.39
$18,827.30
3515 Stock Snd&Slt Cheque 067275
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 5300224256
Vendor
Description
K+S WINDSOR SALT LTD 32.58 T @ $84.74 SALT
Total 067275
Total Stock Snd&Slt
Amount $2,809.42 $2,809.42
$2,809.42
3615 Wayfnd sign Cheque 067263
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 027790
Total 067263 067271
2/16/2016
Vendor
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE 2 x 12 x 12 - 3
Amount $107.61 $107.61
ESKEROD SIGNS 26992 26993
Total 067271 EFT000000005029
Description
2/16/2016
5 PARKING SIGNS 2 ROAD CONDITIONS NORTHWAY HARDWARE AXE supplies
$3,225.79 $1,304.50 $4,530.29
Total EFT000000005029
$40.69 $39.58 $80.27
Total Wayfnd sign
$4,718.17
11277 11278
3625 RR cross mnt Cheque EFT000000004979
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 11081632
Total EFT000000004979
Vendor
Description
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FLASHER CONTRACT
Amount $831.00 $831.00
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Total RR cross mnt
Page:
10
Page 43 of 231 $831.00
3635 Trffc cnts Cheque EFT000000005037
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
PUROLATOR INC. 429891052
SHIPPING CHARGES
Total EFT000000005037
Total Trffc cnts
$66.00 $66.00
$66.00
3638 Locates Cheque EFT000000005030
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
ONTARIO ONE CALL jan 1 - jan 31 2016
Amount
Total EFT000000005030
$6.72 $6.72
Total Locates
$6.72
201664579
3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005041
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
R.W. ELECTRIC FIX CAUTION LIGHT
$576.55 $576.55
electrical repairs Change traffic signals
Total EFT000000005048
$352.70 $8,319.90 $8,672.60
Total Street Lights
$9,249.15
30944 Total EFT000000005041 EFT000000005048 2/16/2016
TRUE ELECTRIC 6677 6683
Total Trans
$676,173.57
40 Env 4110 Water Treat Cheque 067264 Total 067264 EFT000000005050
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
BELL CANADA-WATER TOWER PHONE LINE 16/01-N 602 7631 16/01-N 602 7631
2/16/2016
UTILITIES KINGSTON DEC 2015 PLANT OPERATING COSTS
Amount $74.28 $74.28
Total EFT000000005050
$9,676.19 $9,676.19
Total Water Treat
$9,750.47
31126
5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque EFT000000005017
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
LEONARD FUELS
Total EFT000000005017
$70.35 $70.35
Total SW & Fac OH
$70.35
0363-676340
80 L @ $0.8841
5105 Garb coll Cheque 067285
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
2/16/2016
LOUGH GAR SCALES @ $75 X 3 HRS BEDFORD - SCALES
$228.96 $228.96 $457.92
REAR VIEW MIRROR REAR VIEW MIRROR / WHEEL ASY TUNGSTEN BULB
$640.19 $1,112.27 $10.27 $1,762.73
PETRIE FORD 207072 207222 206639
Total EFT000000005034 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 54565 Total EFT000000005047 EFT000000005051 2/16/2016
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 2015/12/03-02 15/12/03-03
Total 067285 EFT000000005034
Description
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE gar bags VERSUS BUSINESS FORMS & LABELS
$26.45 $26.45
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 40597
580M Garbage Tags
Total EFT000000005051
Total Garb coll
Page:
11
Page 44 of 231 $7,755.33 $7,755.33
$10,002.43
5110 Gab disp Cheque 067263
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 029816
Total 067263 067285
2/16/2016
Vendor
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE PIPE
2/16/2016
portland dump PORTLAND DUMP RUN DEC 2015
362096
AVERY WEIGH-TRONIX TRUCK TESTING/ TRAVEL TIME
INVI06601733
HD SUPPLY CANADA, INC 40 keyed locks
Total EFT000000004974 EFT000000005008 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005008 EFT000000005036 2/16/2016
Amount $28.97 $28.97
SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/11-03 2015/12/21-02
Total 067285 EFT000000004974
Description
PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000021450 69.54 MT rresi/ici waste
Total EFT000000005036 EFT000000005054 2/16/2016 511051
WHALEY, GEORGE JAN 2016 LANDFILL MAINT
Total EFT000000005054
Total Gab disp
$356.16 $178.08 $534.24 $1,945.65 $1,945.65 $759.94 $759.94 $6,428.05 $6,428.05 $4,324.80 $4,324.80
$14,021.65
5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 067285
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
SNIDER, PERCY 2016/01/11-04 2016/01/12-06 2016/01/08-07 2015/12/31-05
SALEM RECYCLE GREENBAY RECYCLE BRADSHAW RECYCLE DEC 2015 GREENBAY RECYCLE RUN
Total 067285
Total Rec Disp/Prc
$534.24 $330.72 $864.96 $661.44 $2,391.36
$2,391.36
5305 HHW Cheque EFT000000004978
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
20160016 20160016 20160016
BRENDAR ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Oil waste for jan 2016 HHW Jan 14 & 28 chemical waste Jan 2016
56681
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE batteries
Total EFT000000004978 EFT000000005047 2/16/2016 Total EFT000000005047
Total HHW
Amount $664.59 $814.08 $844.61 $2,323.28 $3.84 $3.84
$2,327.12
5315 Bale wrap Cheque EFT000000005052
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 C131
Vendor
Description
WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NOV-JAN BALER RENTAL
Total EFT000000005052
Total Bale wrap
Amount $457.92 $457.92
$457.92
Total Env
$39,021.30
70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque EFT000000004991
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016 1070
Vendor
Description
D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS WINTER IINTERMENT x 2
Amount $1,058.30
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Total EFT000000004991
Page:
12
Page 45 of 231 $1,058.30
Total Health
$1,058.30
Total Cem
$1,058.30
80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067272 Total 067272 067286 Total 067286 067287 Total 067287 EFT000000004970
Date 2/16/2016
Inv #
FISHER, DAVE 151221-STORRREC
2/16/2016
16/02/03-33
VOTARY, RICHARD SNOWPLOWING 4 @ $65
21761
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. SNOWPLOWING 8 @ $50
Total EFT000000005040 EFT000000005042 2/16/2016
$162.82 $162.82 $260.00 $260.00 $407.04 $407.04 $30.00 $30.00
KOT, JOHN 151221-STORRREC
15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC
$30.00 $30.00
monthly monitoring & rental monthly monitoring & rental
$25.44 $25.44 $50.88
LONDRY ALARMS
PANTREY, AMANDA 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC SEC. ROLLINS, ELLWOOD 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC SMITH, ROBERTA 151221-STORRREC 15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC
Total EFT000000005042 EFT000000005044 2/16/2016 9920108 Total EFT000000005044 EFT000000005056 2/16/2016
$30.00 $30.00
15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC
183096 183096
Total EFT000000005031 EFT000000005040 2/16/2016
Amount
FOX, KEVIN 151221-STORRREC
Total EFT000000005014 EFT000000005022 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005022 EFT000000005031 2/16/2016
15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC
UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC fence rental
2/16/2016
Total EFT000000005001 EFT000000005014 2/16/2016
Description
133270344-002 2/16/2016
Total EFT000000004970 EFT000000005001 2/16/2016
Vendor
SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 1621.8 L @ $0.8224
WOOD, ALVIN 151221-REC STORR
Total EFT000000005056 EFT000000005057 2/16/2016 50351 50351 50351 50351
15 DEC 21 STORRINGTON REC
XCG CONSULTANTS LTD. DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING DRINKING WATER TESTING
Total EFT000000005057
Total Rec
$50.00 $50.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $1,377.38 $1,377.38 $30.00 $30.00 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $407.04
$2,895.16
8210 VCA Cheque 067269
Date
Inv #
2/16/2016
Vendor
Description
COLEMAN, DONALD coffee for VCA directors meein
Amount
Total 067269
$9.83 $9.83
Total VCA
$9.83
Total Rec
$2,904.99
2015126
90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque
Date
Inv #
Vendor
Description
Amount
System:
2/11/2016
User ID:
lfragnito
EFT000000004987
9:59:13 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
2/16/2016 AR160007
Total EFT000000004987
CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION RISK MANAGEMENT OCT - DEC
Page:
13
Page 46 of 231 $427.49 $427.49
Total Plan
$427.49
Total Plan
$427.49
Total
$2,071,800.79
Page 47 of 231
Payment Listing For the period of February 17, 2016 to March 1, 2016
Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of February 17, 2016 to March 1, 2016
651,482.30
Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #4
Pay date February 17, 2016 For the period of January 31, 2016 to February 13, 2016
76,070.35
Council Reimbursement
Pay date February 17, 2016
647.02
Council Honorarium
Pay date February 29, 2016
9,795.99
Total Payments
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending March 1, 2016 in the amount of
$
737,995.66
Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer
$
737,995.66
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
Ranges: Cheque Date:
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
11:43:59 AM
From: 2/17/2016
To: 3/1/2016
Page:
1
Page 48 of 231
Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC
10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000005088
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
60295 60267
THE FRONTENAC NEWS FEB 18 AD FEB 11 2016 AD
IN-54404-01
ZYCOM TECHNOLOGY INC. IT Services FEB 2016
Total EFT000000005088 EFT000000005123 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005123
Total Gen
Amount $368.15 $454.55 $822.70 $1,780.80 $1,780.80
$2,603.50
1000 Cheque 067307
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 5811
Total 067307 EFT000000005077
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
SPADA TILE (BELLEVILLE) LIMITED INSTALL CARPET, BASBOARDS
Amount $1,060.34 $1,060.34
CANADIAN TIRE 125004
Total EFT000000005077 EFT000000005078 3/1/2016
DOOR STOPS
$26.73 $26.73
LCD TV
$725.86 $725.86
CDW CANADA INC CDM5598
Total EFT000000005078 EFT000000005083 3/1/2016 0901926
DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY tung heads
24694 24695
SELECT DOOR AND FRAME DOOR INSTALL OFFICE DOOR
28677
SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 2404.2 L @ $0.9093
4016
WEMP & SMITH CONSTRUCTION LTD. meeting room carpentry work
Total EFT000000005083 EFT000000005111 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005111 EFT000000005114 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005114 EFT000000005122 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005122
Total
$123.14 $123.14 $128.48 $459.45 $587.93 $2,246.97 $2,246.97 $3,968.64 $3,968.64
$8,739.61
1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000005082
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000045476 FEB 2016 EAP IVC00000000041876 NOV 2014 EAP
Total EFT000000005082 EFT000000005104 3/1/2016 76586
PRINTFUSION INC. MARCH NEWSLETTER 11,0000
3569 3574
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND CREAM & COFFEE CREAM
Total EFT000000005104 EFT000000005118 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005118
Total Clk
Amount $181.67 $173.48 $355.15 $656.40 $656.40 $33.71 $4.39 $38.10
$1,049.65
1275 Fin Cheque 067293
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 STHFT-1602B STHFT-1602A
Total 067293
Vendor
Description
APPLIED GEOLOGICS INC 2016 AGL TCA 2016 CARTELITE SUBSCRIPTION
Amount $508.80 $798.61 $1,307.41
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
EFT000000005098
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
3/1/2016 0003147
MARTIN’S DATA MANAGEMENT 2 shred bag
40685
VERSUS BUSINESS FORMS & LABELS 8 M Self adhesive tax bill env
Total EFT000000005098 EFT000000005121 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005121
Page:
2
Page 49 of 231 $134.32 $134.32 $2,329.41 $2,329.41
Total Fin
$3,771.14
Total GG
$16,163.90
20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067309
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 019227
Total 067309 067313 Total 067313 EFT000000005067
3/1/2016
Description
TIM HORTONS #4458 COFFEE FOR ICE WATER RESUCE
WILLIAMS, KATHY 16/02/19-CLEANING NOV,DEC,JAN,FEB CLEANING
3/1/2016 02500783 02664191
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL FEB 2016 PEST CONTROL FEB 2016
0000126129 PF00766634
AJ STONE COMPANY LIMITED FOAM FIREADE2000 2 WAY BALL VALVE
KP37070 KS15908
KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON SAFE-T-BRAKE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT
1187669
LEVAC SUPPLY LIMITED AIRMAX/BRASS HOSE
Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005070 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005070 EFT000000005091 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005091 EFT000000005095 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005095 EFT000000005113 3/1/2016
Vendor
SNIDER, LISA 16/01/29-CLEANING
Total EFT000000005113 EFT000000005114 3/1/2016 348124 252384
2 CLEANS @ $35.00
SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 675.5 L @ $0.7914 1275.2 l @ $0.7814
Total EFT000000005114
Total Fire
Amount $19.18 $19.18 $595.00 $595.00 $42.60 $40.70 $83.30 $3,358.08 $2,348.62 $5,706.70 $27.56 $447.95 $475.51 $123.07 $123.07 $70.00 $70.00 $565.35 $1,035.33 $1,600.68
$8,673.44
2110 Cvc# Cheque EFT000000005112
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
SIGNS PLUS 2926
8 CIVIC NUMBERS
Total EFT000000005112
Total Cvc#
$73.27 $73.27
$73.27
2400 Police Cheque 067301
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES policing contract Feb 2016
Amount
Total 067301
$244,876.00 $244,876.00
Total Police
$244,876.00
17160216052
2510 Quinte Cheque EFT000000005108
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 IN000023507
Total EFT000000005108
Total Quinte
Vendor
Description
QUINTE CONSERVATION LEVIES 2016
Amount $101,305.00 $101,305.00
$101,305.00
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
3
Page 50 of 231
2605 Build Cheque EFT000000005098
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 0003147
Vendor
Description
MARTIN’S DATA MANAGEMENT 1 shred bag
Total EFT000000005098
Total Build
Amount $67.16 $67.16
$67.16
2620 Anml Ctl Cheque EFT000000005087
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-AC-2016-JANUARY JAN ANIMAL CONTROL
Total EFT000000005087
Total Anml Ctl
Amount $3,256.19 $3,256.19
$3,256.19
2625 Lvstck Cheque 067297
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
FOSTER, ANNETTE 16/01/08-BULLCALF JAN 8 2016 BULL CALF KILL
Amount
Total 067297
$1,067.50 $1,067.50
Total Lvstck
$1,067.50
2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005087
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-RP-2016-JANUARY 1200 KM @ $.52 SF-RP-2016-JANUARY 20 HRS @ $22.5 SF-B-2016-JANUARY 310 KM @ $0.52 KM SF-B-2016-JANUARY 15 H @ $22.50
Total EFT000000005087
Total Bylaw enf
Amount $634.98 $457.92 $164.04 $343.44 $1,600.38
$1,600.38
Total PP&P
$360,918.94
30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067291 Total 067291 067293
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
407 ETR 16/02- 832773875
3/1/2016
Description 407 TRAVEL JAN 20 2016
APPLIED GEOLOGICS INC 2016 AGL TCA 2016 CARTELITE SUBSCRIPTION
Amount $22.72 $22.72
Total 067293
$2,035.20 $3,194.45 $5,229.65
Total PW OH
$5,252.37
STHFT-1602B STHFT-1602A
3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067299
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
GILMOUR’S ON 38 672871
EGGS/BACON/BREAD/BUTTER
Total 067299
Total RdAdmOH
$23.10 $23.10
$23.10
3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067294 Total 067294 067296 Total 067296
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
4855A
ARNOTT BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LTD Holdback release - culverts
0072837
EQUIPEMENTS LOURDS PAPINEAU INC front nose one way
3/1/2016
Amount $21,719.63 $21,719.63 $74.41 $74.41
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
067300 Total 067300 067305 Total 067305 067306 Total 067306 067311 Total 067311 067315 Total 067315 EFT000000005067
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
3/1/2016 2016-008
MACDONALD & EBERHARDT SURVEYING LTD harrowsmith boundary survey
5389
ROAD MAINTENANCE EQUIP & SERVICES SNYDER TANK LID
3/1/2016
3/1/2016
SHAW DIRECT 16/02-200-2483-8027
3/1/2016 00042385
VAUGHAN’S AUTOMOTIVE OIL CHANGE
04C030610-001
TOROMONT INDUSTRIES LTD. HALOGEN LAMP
02397511
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. 12 bait stations keeley
38233862
AECOM CANADA LTD Engineering fees
63799536
AIR LIQUIDE CANADA INC. OXYGEN
787655
BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS Exhaust fluid & drum deposit
024273 024273 024273 024273 024273
CHAMPION INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS CALIBRATION OF SPREADERS
3/1/2016
3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005068 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005068 EFT000000005069 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005069 EFT000000005075 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005075 EFT000000005079 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005079 EFT000000005080 3/1/2016
4
Page 51 of 231 $4,070.40 $4,070.40 $323.60 $323.60 $48.88 $48.88 $85.42 $85.42 $16.85 $16.85 $0.40 $0.40 $4,950.42 $4,950.42 $26.50 $26.50 $150.60 $150.60 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $137.38 $686.90
CINTAS 884709161 884709161 884709161 884710817 884710817 884710817
Total EFT000000005080 EFT000000005083 3/1/2016
SUPPLIES HARRINGTON UNIFORM GEMMILL UNIFORM SUPPLIES HARRINGTON UNIFORM GEMMILL UNIFORM
0901926
DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY battery
7070
D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING NEW HITCH FOR TRAILER
Total EFT000000005083 EFT000000005084 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005084 EFT000000005085 3/1/2016
$186.23 $13.29 $9.50 $116.52 $14.75 $10.56 $350.85 $43.59 $43.59 $198.43 $198.43
DRAPER DOORS 9070
cables off bay #6 & fuse #4
35580
GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC Cylinder hyd lift and labour
9303843302 9303843301 9303848516
KENT AUTOMOTIVE PARTS SCREW PIN HOSE & RELEASE CABLE TIES
29976
L.D. POWER SPORTS filter & chain oil
Total EFT000000005085 EFT000000005089 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005089 EFT000000005090 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005090 EFT000000005093 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005093 EFT000000005094 3/1/2016
$164.34 $164.34 $7,281.26 $7,281.26 $95.83 $57.70 $1,578.62 $1,732.15 $66.81 $66.81
LEONARD FUELS 3160-673852 3160-677540
Total EFT000000005094 EFT000000005097 3/1/2016 019548 Total EFT000000005097
Feb 7 -Mar 6 satellite
Page:
438.1 L @ $.641 407.9 L @ $.594 M.A. BARR SERVICE STATION FIX BULK DIESEL TANK LEAK
$285.76 $246.55 $532.31 $662.97 $662.97
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
EFT000000005099
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
3/1/2016 200191
MCKEOWN AND WOOD FUELS 1955.2 L @ $0.6120
20160205
MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD ANDERSON RD WASHOUT
30281522-B
NATIONAL ENERGY EQUIPMENT INC REEVED UP COMISSIONING
Total EFT000000005099 EFT000000005100 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005100 EFT000000005101 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005101 EFT000000005102 3/1/2016
Page:
5
Page 52 of 231 $1,217.64 $1,217.64 $9,407.71 $9,407.71 $508.80 $508.80
PETRIE FORD 207177
Total EFT000000005102 EFT000000005103 3/1/2016
FILTER
$78.50 $78.50
PIN HITCH/REC REDUCER TIE DOWNS/IMPACT AIR WRENCH socket, torch, butane
$42.70 $336.29 $45.76 $424.75
SHIPPING CHARGES
$109.30 $109.30
PRINCESS AUTO 27-4-102570 27-3-103829 27-1-105178
Total EFT000000005103 EFT000000005107 3/1/2016
PUROLATOR INC. 430192591
Total EFT000000005107 EFT000000005109 3/1/2016 173-107823 173-107554 173-108170 173-105730
QUINTE TRUCK & TRAILER PARTS PINTLE MOUNT LED SIGNAL LIGHT PARTS FITTING & AIRBRAKE WIPER BLADES, LED LIGHTS ETC
K540603
SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED ICE MELTER
427951
TALLMAN TRUCK CENTRE LIMITED ENGINE LIGHT ON
2708 3726 3726
TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND sugar and cream WATER WATER
57103 53771 57127 500174 500172
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE materials 24 MAIL BOXES 6 BEAVER FORKS SKID OF WATER DEWALT BATTERY
150247
TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS otterbox
Total EFT000000005109 EFT000000005115 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005115 EFT000000005116 3/1/2016 Total EFT000000005116 EFT000000005118 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005118 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005119 EFT000000005120 3/1/2016
$116.87 $182.30 $233.81 $318.34 $851.32 $45.64 $45.64 $212.41 $212.41 $5.68 $22.95 $22.95 $51.58 $62.79 $488.20 $343.77 $355.14 $263.56 $1,513.46
Total EFT000000005120
$61.05 $61.05
Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl
$57,668.88
3502 Winter Prop Damage Cheque 067295 Total 067295 EFT000000005072
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
026810
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE mail box and supplies
2440
ASSELSTINE HARDWARE MAIL BOXES
3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005072
Total Winter Prop Damage
Amount $58.72 $58.72 $38.65 $38.65
$97.37
3505 Snw Plwng Cheque EFT000000005066
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 21764 21760 21759
Total EFT000000005066 EFT000000005076 3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 9 @ $30.00 9 @ $55.00 9 @ $30.00 CABINTREE
Amount $274.75 $503.71 $274.75 $1,053.21
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 1030
Total EFT000000005076 EFT000000005092 3/1/2016 2015-13316 2016-13355 2016-13354 2016-13353 2016-13352 2016-13357 2016-13356 2015-13316-2 2015-13255 2015-13254 2015-13317 2015-13314 2015-13315 2015-13318 Total EFT000000005092 EFT000000005117 3/1/2016
4 plows @ $130 K MULROONEY TRUCKING LIMITED 22 @ $154.00 20.5 @ $154.00 16.5 @ $159.00 56 @ $147.00 57 @ $147.00 22 @ $154.00 18.5 @ $154.00 20 @ $154.00 59.5 @ $147.00 53 @ $147.00 22.5 @ $154.00 8 @ $159.00 30.5 @ $154.00 23.5 @ $154.00
Page:
6
Page 53 of 231 $529.15 $529.15 $2,977.50 $3,212.56 $2,669.67 $8,376.88 $8,526.47 $3,447.63 $2,899.14 $3,134.21 $8,900.44 $7,928.12 $3,525.98 $1,294.39 $4,779.67 $3,682.69 $65,355.35
TEM ROADWORK 107902
30.5 h @ $75.00
Total EFT000000005117
Total Snw Plwng
$2,327.76 $2,327.76
$69,265.47
3506 Snow Clearing Sidewalks Cheque EFT000000005066
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 21766 21765
Vendor
Description
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 6 @ $65.00 sidewalks @ skidsteer
Total EFT000000005066
Total Snow Clearing Sidewalks
Amount $396.86 $1,798.61 $2,195.47
$2,195.47
3601 Barricds & Sfty Matls Cheque EFT000000005073
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 24192065
Vendor
Description
BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS safety glasses / vest
Total EFT000000005073
Total Barricds & Sfty Matls
Amount $114.99 $114.99
$114.99
3620 Reg signs Cheque EFT000000005119
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 56929
Vendor
Description
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE LUMBER
Total EFT000000005119
Total Reg signs
Amount $85.25 $85.25
$85.25
3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005112
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
SIGNS PLUS
Total EFT000000005112
$82.37 $82.37
Total Street Lights
$82.37
2926
3 ST SIGNS
3800 Crssng Guards Cheque EFT000000005063
Date
Inv #
2/29/2016
Total EFT000000005065
Description
Amount
SNIDER, DEBBIE 16/02 16/02
19 DAYS @ $45.00 16/02 SNIDER WSIB
16/02 16/02
MACINTYRE, DOUG 16/02 - 19 days crossing guar 16/02 WSIB MACINTYRE CROSSING
Total EFT000000005063 EFT000000005065 2/29/2016
Total Crssng Guards
Vendor
$855.00 $24.62 $879.62 $570.00 $16.42 $586.42
$1,466.04
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Total Trans
Page:
7
Page 54 of 231 $136,251.31
40 Env 5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque 067295
Total 067295 EFT000000005106
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
031184 031184
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE FIRST AID KIT GATE HINGE
543
PRO-TECH TRAINING SOLID WASTE DRIVER TRANING X2
57103
TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE snow shovel
3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005106 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016
Amount $37.64 $31.29 $68.93 $244.22 $244.22
Total EFT000000005119
$19.32 $19.32
Total SW & Fac OH
$332.47
5105 Garb coll Cheque 067290
Total 067290 EFT000000005062
Date 2/29/2016
2/29/2016
Inv #
Vendor
SNIDER, PERCY 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ
Description 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ Jan 2016 CPI Increase
Total EFT000000005062 EFT000000005074 3/1/2016 20160204 Total EFT000000005074 EFT000000005102 3/1/2016
BENSON TRUCK & TRAILER WHEEL NUT/STUD
Amount $11,274.39 $9,306.49 $242.70 $200.33 $21,023.91 $11,517.09 $247.93 $11,765.02 $235.78 $235.78
PETRIE FORD 207462 207446 207531
CHECK ASY - DOOR FILTER/EXHAUST EXHAUST PIPE
Total EFT000000005102
Total Garb coll
$70.61 $2,740.01 $207.71 $3,018.33
$36,043.04
5110 Gab disp Cheque 067295
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 031184 031184 031184
Total 067295 EFT000000005061
2/29/2016
Total EFT000000005105
ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE GATE HINGE GATE HINGE GATE HINGE
01046176 01046176 01046176 03366622
ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. dump pest control dump pest control dump pest control MARCH 2016 PEST CONTROL
84084
ENVIRO-GUARD PLUS INC. rodent control MONTHLY FEE
Total EFT000000005067 EFT000000005086 3/1/2016
Total Gab disp
Description
WHALEY, GEORGE 16/02 DISPOSAL 16/02 DISPOSAL
Total EFT000000005061 EFT000000005067 3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005086 EFT000000005105 3/1/2016
Vendor
PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000021474 7.01 MT WASTE 3 BULK 2 SCRAPE 647-0000213928 8.92 MT waste & dump run
Amount $31.30 $31.30 $31.30 $93.90 $1,935.80 $1,935.80 $53.85 $53.85 $53.85 $93.25 $254.80 $42.74 $42.74 $704.53 $904.38 $1,608.91
$3,936.15
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Page:
8
Page 55 of 231
5205 Recyc Coll Cheque 067290
Total 067290 EFT000000005062
Date 2/29/2016
2/29/2016
Inv #
Vendor
SNIDER, PERCY 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ 16/02 & JAN 2016 ADJ
Description 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase Jan 2016 CIP increase
1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ 16/02 COLLECTION 16/02 & JAN CIP ADJ Jan 2016 CPI Increase
Total EFT000000005062
Amount $12,162.26 $10,605.36 $11,320.41 $261.82 $228.29 $243.68 $34,821.82 $9,907.17 $213.26 $10,120.43
Total Recyc Coll
$44,942.25
Total Env
$85,253.91
70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque EFT000000005064
Date
Inv #
2/29/2016 16/02
Vendor
Description
D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS 16/02
Total EFT000000005064
Amount $875.14 $875.14
Total Health
$875.14
Total Cem
$875.14
80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067292 Total 067292 067310
Total 067310 EFT000000005060
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
W29012
ALEX MCCOY PLUMBING & HEATING SEPTIC LOCATE
133270344-003 134288524-001
UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC FENCE RENTAL FENCE RENTAL
16/02
LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/02 MAINTENANCE
3/1/2016
2/29/2016
Total EFT000000005060 EFT000000005094 3/1/2016
Amount $269.46 $269.46 $122.11 $915.84 $1,037.95 $142.50 $142.50
LEONARD FUELS 1361-673384 0838-675214 0838-677815 0838-679549
Total EFT000000005094 EFT000000005119 3/1/2016 500171 56946
310.3 L @ $.628 483 L @ $.628 329.9 L @ $.602 332.6 L @ $0.610 TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE DOCK PACKAGE/ SCREWS NUTS, BOLTS, LUMBER, 26 FLOATS
Total EFT000000005119
Total Rec
$198.30 $308.65 $202.10 $206.46 $915.51 $250.26 $1,663.26 $1,913.52
$4,278.94
8020 Swim Cheque EFT000000005096
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 138159
Vendor
Description
LIFESAVING SOCIETY 2015 SWIM FAILS
Total EFT000000005096
Total Swim
Amount $46.71 $46.71
$46.71
8036 Family Day Cheque 067298
Date 3/1/2016
Inv #
Vendor
Description
GARRISON, NORMAN K.
Amount
System:
2/25/2016
User ID:
srummell
11:43:59 AM
Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT
Total 067302 067303
FAMIL DAY FOOD
$488.94 $488.94
50
8 gift cert @ $25.00
$200.00 $200.00
PIXLEY, CARL 1602-FAMILYDAY
FIREWOOD FAMILY DAY
$100.00 $100.00
3/1/2016
GILMOUR’S ON 38
Total 067303 067304 Total 067304 067308 Total 067308 EFT000000005088
3/1/2016
3/1/2016
3/1/2016
3/1/2016
Page 56 of 231 $375.00 $375.00
1602-FOOD Total 067299 067302
9
HORSE AND WAGON FAMILY DAY
1602-FAMILYDAY Total 067298 067299
Page:
NICOLE’S GIFTS
PIXLEY, JEANETTE 1602-FAMILYDAY FOOD SERVICES FAMILY DAY TAKALA, SCOTT 16/02-FAMILY DAY
3/1/2016 60276
FAMILY DAY COORDINATOR
THE FRONTENAC NEWS FAMILY DAY AD
Total EFT000000005088
Total Family Day
$250.00 $250.00 $200.00 $200.00 $486.77 $486.77
$2,100.71
8210 VCA Cheque 067312
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
VERONA FOODLAND FOOD FOR COMMUNITY RECOGNITION
Amount
Total 067312
$28.24 $28.24
Total VCA
$28.24
Total Rec
$6,454.60
GROC 1520
90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque EFT000000005110
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016
Vendor
Description
Amount
SAADE, SAMER 149
29 HR @ $30 AGGREGATE / ZONING
Total EFT000000005110
$870.00 $870.00
Total Plan
$870.00
Total Plan
$870.00
99 9999 Cheque 067314
Date
Inv #
3/1/2016 TAXREFUND
Total 067314 EFT000000005081
3/1/2016
Total EFT000000005081
Vendor
Description
DIEBOLD, HELMUT Tax refund 1029-030-020-93655
CITY OF KINGSTON 15/12/31-OVERPMT 2015 arterial roads overpaymen
Amount $2,588.50 $2,588.50 $42,106.00 $42,106.00
Total
$44,694.50
Total
$44,694.50
Total
$651,482.30
Page 57 of 231
STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Prepared for Council:
February 18, 2016
Agenda Date: March 1, 2016
SUBJECT: Tender No. PW-2016-02 - Purchase of One (1) 2017 Tandem Dump Truck. BACKGROUND: One (1) Tandem Axle Dump Truck was budgeted to replace a 2000 Tandem Dump Truck and a tender was sent out. This tender was advertised on the internet, on our website, and in the local paper. This tender closed on January 27, 2016 and twelve bids were received. The results, in ascending order, are as follows: Supplier
Sub-Total
Trade-In
Total
Antrim Truck Centre $258,038.14 (Western Star with ELP Plow Equipment)
$3,000.00
$255,038.14
$288,193.10
Surgenor Truck Group (Mack with Tenco Equipment)
$256,620.00
$1,500.00
$255,120.00
$288,285.60
Cornwall Freightliner $260,011.00 (Freightliner with Tenco Plow Equipment)
$4,000.00
$256,011.00
$289,292.43
Cornwall Freightliner $261,686.83 (Freightliner with ELP Plow Equipment)
$4,000.00
$257,686.83
$291,186.12
Tallman Truck Centre $265,313.79 (International with ELP Plow Equipment)
$7,000.00
$258,313.79
$291,894.58
Tallman Truck Centre $265,937.96 (International with Tenco Plow Equipment)
$7,000.00
$258,937.96
$292,599.90
Francis Canada Truck Centre $262,104.55 (Viking Plow Equipment)
$2,000.00
$260,104.55
Total (Inc. HST)
$293,918.14
Surgenor Truck Group $278,620.00 (Mack with Viking Plow Equipment)
$1,500.00
$277,120.00
$313,145.60
Tallman Truck Centre $288,137.96 (International with Viking Plow Equipment)
$7,000.00
$281,137.96
$317,685.90
Francis Canada Truck Centre $291,244.00 (Freightliner with Viking Plow Equipment)
$2,000.00
$289,244.00
$326,845.72
Kingston Kenworth $316,463.00 (Kenworth with Viking Plow Equipment)
$7,500.00
$308,963.00
$349,128.19
Surgenor Truck Group $318,918.69 (Volvo with Viking Plow Equipment)
$2,500.00
$316,418.69
$357,553.12
ANALYSIS: The Municipality tendered for a Tandem Dump Truck, similar to previous years. Last year an automatic transmission was proposed, rather than the traditional manual transmission. It is estimated that Automatic Transmissions currently are specified in 50% of Heavy Truck tenders and will continue to grow with the change of demographic of the workforce. Benefits include better fuel efficiency and less driver fatigue. An amount of $250,000 was budgeted this year to
Page 58 of 231
STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
account for the steady increase in the USD based on the price paid last year of $237,157.74, plus HST. This increase was not substantial enough to cover the 40% USD increase. The submission of the lowest bidder, Antrim Truck Centre, has been evaluated for completeness and accuracy. While the Municipality does not currently own a Western Star other local Municipalities have purchased the model submitted in the last year and have provided good feedback on their experiences. Staff also took the opportunity to travel to Greater Napanee and demonstrate their 2016 Model Western Star with good results. For these reasons, and also because their tendered price is $92.50 lower than the bid from Surgenor Truck Centre, the Public Works Department recommends awarding the tender to Antrim Truck Centre, for $288,193.10 including HST. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $250,000.00 has been approved in the 2016 Capital Budget for the purchase of a current model Tandem Dump Truck. All of the submissions provided exceed this budget, which can be attributed to the steady increase in the USD. The Capital Budget figure submitted did not reflect this level of increase as it was not foreseen. The net increase in the budgeted amount of $250,000 is $9,527.32 when taking into account the Municipal Rebate on the HST. Sufficient funds exist in the Equipment Replacement Reserve to fund this purchase. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approves the submission from Antrim Truck Centre, for Tender PW2016-02, tandem dump truck complete with Snowplow Equipment, in the amount of $255,038.14, plus HST.
Submitted/approved by:
Prepared by:
Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager
David Holliday Area Supervisor
Page 59 of 231
PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council
Planning Department
Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 19, 2016 File: RC-15/01 Subject: Closing of Road Allowance in Between Concessions IX and X and Between Lots 30 and 31, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Mahmud
Summary of the Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass a by-law to stop up, close and transfer ownership of a portion of two unopened road allowances between Concessions IX and X and between Lots 30 and 31, District of Bedford. Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a road closure and transfer of ownership to an abutting property-owner. A public meeting was held on September 15, 2015 on the application as required under the Municipal Act. This report includes a location attachment, a letter from the owner requesting the closure, a map illustrating the portions of road allowance to be closed and a by-law to close and sell the land. Background & Discussion: By letter dated March 26, 2015, the property-owner at 306 Campground Lane requested to know whether Council would agree to the closure and sale of two portions of unopened road allowance that abut his properties. Attachment #1 shows the location of the owner’s properties and Attachment #2 is a copy of the letter requesting Council’s consideration of the closures. Council may remember that this request came to the Committee of the Whole on June 9, 2015 where members were generally in agreement with the closures. Since that time the owner scaled back his proposal and is now proposing to acquire the two portions shown on Attachment #3. The final lot configuration, after the closures and ownership transfers, is shown on Attachment #4. Burridge Road is a forced road which was constructed to the east of the road allowance that it would normally have followed, presumably through more acceptable topography. The effect of this alignment is that many sections of the road allowance are redundant- meaning that they will probably never be used by the Township for roads. Because of this, portions of both of these unopened road allowances have already been closed and sold as seen on the attachments. A public meeting on the application was held on September 15, 2015 and no concerns were expressed. Since then the owner has completed a survey identifying the subject portions of road allowance and., accordingly, the proposal is now ready to be finalized and a by-law passed to close and transfer the ownership. Agency Comments: The Public Works Department has no objection the closures. No comments were received from the public at the public meeting.
Page 60 of 231
Conclusion: The road allowances do not lead to water and thus it appears that they would probably not be useful as a future road or access for the public. Thus, it appears that the closing and sale of the portions of road allowances is an acceptable land use decision. The property-owner will acquire more usable land and the Township would benefit from the funds received from land that would never be used for municipal purposes. For Council’s information, the applicant must pay $8,525.00 to the Township which is the total cost of the land. The by-law may be passed at this time but the actual land transfer would only take place when a deed is prepared to transfer the land. Staff will not stamp the deed until the applicant has paid the full cost to the Township. Recommendation: It is recommended that Council Pass By-law No. 2016-11 to close and sell a portion of the unopened road allowances identified as Part 1 and Part 3 on Plan 13R- 21244 lying between Concessions IX and X and between Lots 30 and 31, Lot 25, District of Bedford. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments MahmudRoadClosureReport3
Prepared by: Lindsay Mills
Page 61 of 231
Page 62 of 231
ATTACHMENT #2 Townsliip of South Frontenac Planning Department P.O.Box , 4432 George St. Sydenliani, ON KOH 2TO Attention Mr. Lindsay Mills 26 March, 2015 Dear Mr. Mills,
Enclosed is a plan showing road allowances (coloured in yellow) and a 2 acres lot, (coloured in orange) with a house on it. Please help me in doing the following:
1 . I would like the Township to close the road allowances numbered 1,2 &3 and sell them to me.
Exchange the road allowance (coloured in yellow) and numbered 1 with a new road allowance (coloured in blue) and numbered 2.
I am assuming that the 2 acres lot has been severed, what would be the annual property tax on it? A copy of the 2015 Interim Tax Notice for the whole property (92 acres) is enclosed.
Sincerely, ,/l e? '
,‘11
Qasem Mahrnud,P.Eng. Phone: 613-723-1698
Email: qmahmud33@Igmail.com Mailing Address:
1 Castlethorpe Cres Ottawa, ON K2G 5P6
Page 63 of 231
ATTACHMENT #3
Oi
l[)
I
(
s
?
Y/’,
!==4 ?l
?l
:};
?-l -l -I
?
a=
.1
?l -I
t=i?
‘7
Page 64 of 231
ATTACHMENT #4 FINAL LOT CONFIGURATIONS
01
D
r
‘!, Pa
,S ?l
-I
’l;
=l yl
-l 1.
ffi
IIJ a?
Th, -l 1
sr
Page 65 of 231
PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council
Planning Department
Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 18, 2016 Subject: Assumption of a Road Widening: Part Lot 12, Concession X, Storrington District, Ramparts Road; Township of South Frontenac:
Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass By-law Number 2016-16 to assume a road widening as a common highway.
Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a by-law to assume as a public highway a road widening that was dedicated to the Township as a condition of a consent application.
Background & Discussion: In 2001 a new residential lot was created by consent on Ramparts Road in Storrington District. During the survey work for the new lot, Ramparts Road was surveyed and discovered to be undersized in terms of width and, thus, a road widening was identified and was dedicated to the Township. However, it has been brought to the attention of the Planning Department that the road widening was never assumed as part of Ramparts Road as a highway. Attachment #1 shows the location of the road widening. The attached by-law is a by-law to assume the road widening.
Recommendation: It is recommended that By-law Number 2016-16 to assume as a common and public highway lands identified as parts 2 to 8 inclusive in Plan 13R-16242, be passed. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills
attachments RoadAssumptionBylawReportRamparts
Prepared by: Lindsay Mills,
I
I
Page 66 of 231
4ffacA*rht a/
p
t
I)
RAMPARTS LANE -d
E
,‘U
Jessa4, W
%
m
q€€
7
I?
1
(I
,?
,,/
toughborough Lake
t
l
? 1
11 MNburn Cri /'<
Page 67 of 231 PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016
Planning Department
Date of Report: February 16, 2016 Subject: Severance Applications at Petworth Road, Portland District: Possible Parkland Dedication: Kerr
SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that Council receive a Planning Report dated February 16, 2016, for consideration and discussion regarding a request to dedicate parkland on Petworth Road in the Hamlet of Petworth. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring back to Council a proposal to require the dedication of parkland instead of cash-in-lieu as a condition of approval of two severance applications. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2015, property-owner Chris Kerr submitted applications to create two new waterfront residential lots on the Napanee River in the hamlet of Petworth. The parcel is accessed from Petworth Road. Proposed Lot #1 would retain access and frontage on Petworth Road while the other proposed lot would be accessed by a private lane to be constructed through Lot #1. The retained portion would have its access from German Road to the west of the severed portions. Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land and Attachment #2 shows the proposed lot layout. The proposed lots would each be approximately 4.5 acres in size and would meet all of the minimum standards for waterfrontage and road/lane frontage. The applications were advertised and came before the Committee of Adjustment on December 10, 2015 for a public meeting and were given conditional approval. However, at the meeting there was some discussion as to whether the remains of the old historic Petworth Mill building that is located on the subject land should be acquired by the Township for preservation and possible future renovation. As a result of this discussion it was agreed to include in the conditions of final approval of the applications wording that cash-in-lieu or parkland will be taken by the Township to fulfill the parkland dedication requirement under section 51.1 of the Planning Act. The matter was brought to the Committee of the Whole on January 12, 2016 where the Committee was asked to consider whether parkland (containing the Petworth Mill building) should be taken instead of the normal cash-in-lieu. However, the Committee thought that we should determine what our liabilities are in assuming this land. They also considered that the building should be fenced-off to prevent vandalism and trespassing, if the Township were to acquire it. It was concluded that the liability issues and the cost of fencing the building should be considered before making any decision. Thus, decision was deferred and staff were directed bring back a report to address these items. Discussion The Petworth Mill is one of several mills built by Stephenson and Lott in the 1840’s. As discussed at the Committee of Adjustment meeting, the structure may or may not be worthy of preservation but, in any case, this would be the opportunity for the Township to acquire it for future renovation purposes and at
Page 68 of 231 least preserve it until its future can be determined. Attachment #3 is a series of photographs of the remaining structure. It should be noted that a portion of the structure appears to already be located on the township-owner road allowance as shown on Attachment #4 shows the location of the structure partially on the road allowance. The Planning Department sought advice from the Township’s solicitor on the issues around liabilities. By e-mail dated February 1, 2016, our solicitor advised that we have a statutory duty to not create a danger and to not act with reckless disregard for persons. He further states that the most prudent course of action would be to fence the area off and not allow access. This way, we would be much better able to defend any claim against us. He advises that signage is also important. A copy of the e-mail is attached as Attachment #5. The fencing costs have now been determined to be approximately $18,500.00 based on information from Public Works on a recent similar job. This would be an 8 foot high chain link fence with barbed wire complete with gate. Attachment #6 lists the typical hardware. Any signage would cost approximately $200.00. RECOMMENDATION Now that an estimate of fencing costs is provided, Council is asked to consider whether parkland (containing the Petworth Mill) should be taken from the subject land as a condition of approval for the consent applications instead of the normal cash-in-lieu of parkland. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachment KerrParklandReportToCofW2016
Prepared by: Lindsay Mills
Page 69 of 231
Attachment #1 r
N
I
W&
I
l
I
W" s
l
I
l
l
l
l
l l
l
l
r. 11
/)
l
i
14]
)
r
]
l
%
?’lL)1
?
-’[J @l
A
‘./ //
7
I
I
%,
l
l I I
/
,g
I
l
l
Il
-?
‘=Jd
I /l
I
’l/I
I i
!
?’s
?‘S
I
i
l
//
l
r
r
8 eL ’ ?l
m
rr
l
‘Napanee Rrver
! l
l
t
l
I
I
I
l l
l
l
I
l
l I
l
l
l
I
t
I
l i
l
l
i i
l l l
)
I
/
/’
i
1
r
l
T
I
e
I
l
I l
l l i
I
/
l
/
I
i
l I
l l
/
li l’
l(
Meters
) 80160 320 480 640 l
l
r
l l
l l l
Page 70 of 231
Page 71 of 231
Page 72 of 231
i
l
l
wa
r
f l! icH? 117i ‘-
Nm 1.1
mi m r m fflla
A ] alls
l
i
i
I
t
l s s
r I
l
t
r
l
z
i
I
s
l
i
l l l
l
i I
l l
I
r
I
s
/i
f/’
k
r l
STRUCTURE
r
l
l
l
j
/l
‘1 rAJ r l l l
?
m?‘DAtl"-OWANCE ' k !=?
I
I
pe?
l
(
l
i
t
7 h
t
l
l
i
7
l
l
/
li
r
r
(
/
l
J
I
/
I
/ Il
I
/
r
/
/
l
l
/
l
l
t
/
/ r 11
l
l
/l l
r I
j
‘L.J
ATTACHMENT #5
Page 73 of 231
Lindsay Mills From:
Tony Fleming tfleming@cswan.com
Sent:
Fffibruary-01-16 2:38 PM
To: Cc:
Lindsay Mills Wayne Orr
Subject:
RE: Proposal to Accept Parkland Containing a Heritage Building
Lindsay,
The Township’s liability, should it acquire this property, would be as set out in the Occupier’s Liability Act. The Act creates two classes of liability depending on the use being made of the property.
- If the Township allows access to the property by the public it has a statutory duty, “to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that persons entering on the premises, and the property brought on the premises by those persons are reasonably safe while on the premises” (section 3 of the Act);
- If the Township fences off the area and does not permit public access, the duty provided in section 3 does not apply and the Township only has a statutory duty, " to not create a danger with the deliberate intent of doing harm or damage to the person or his or her property and to not act with reckless disregard of the presence of the person or his or her property" (s. 4 of the Act).
Given the obvious state of disrepair of the former mill property, it would seem the most prudent course is to fence off the area and allow no access. This will allow the Township to rely on the Iess stringent liability found in section 4 of the Act. This is not to say that the Township would not have liability to persons who may be injured, but a claim would be easier to defend. It would be prudent to consult with your insurer to advise that the property has been acquired and to see if they have any requirements for reducing lability. In additional to fencing the property should be posted with appropriate signage warning of the obvious dangers and prohibiting any access by the public.
We also considered whether the Province could designate this property under the Ontario Heritage Act without the Township’s consent. It is possible for the Province to designate a property as having heritage significance under the Heritage Act. If the Province believes that the property is of significant heritage interest and meets eight criteria set out in Ontario Reg. 10/06, it can designate the property. The Township would have the right to appeal pursuant to the Act. Section 52 (1) would also allow the Province to designate the property without relying on the criteria found in the
Regulation, but using this power requires the Province to pay compensation to the owner of the property; it is unlikely that the Province would ever use this power in relation to this site.
Overall, we believe the risk to be very Iow that the Province would attempt to designate this site is a heritage site. We
come to this conclusion based only on the difficulties posed’in the legislation. If the site is of important historic significance, that would change this assessment.
l hope this information is of assistance. Should you require anything further or have any questions please Iet me know. Thank you
Tony Fleming c.s.
Certified Specialist in Municipal Law (Local Government/Land Use Planning & Development) Partner Cunningham, Swan, Carty, Little & Bonham LLP T 613.546.8096 F 613.542.9814 1
Page 74 of 231
ATTACHMENT #6
TYPICAL GATE AND FENCE HARDWARE List of Materials
Terminal Posts 3-1/2" Dia x 1 3’-6" Sch 40 Line Posts 2-3/8" Dia x 1 2’-6" Sch 40
Sonotube 1 2"x 48" Sonotube 1 2"x 48"
Top Rail 1-1 1/16" Dia x 21’ Sch 40 Top Rail Sleeves 1-1 1/16" Brace Rails 1-1 1/16" x 132"
Wire 2" x 9ga Galvanized 96" Top Rail Ends 1-1 1/16" Line Post Caps 2-3/8" x 1-1 1/1 6" f/ barbed wire Centre Bands 3-1/2" w/bolt & nut Centre Bands 2-3/8" w/bolt & nut Offsett Bands 3-1/2" w/bolt & nut Tension Bands 3/16" x 3/4" x 94"
Terminal Post Caps 3-1/2" Cap-Corner f/ Barbed wire-3-1/2" Tightners-Ratchet Wire-Barbed 12-1 /2ga per ft Galvanized Wire 9ga per ft Aluminum Fence Ties Coated 8-1/4" x 9ga Concrete per Metre Misc Hardware Gate 12 ft w/ Hardware
Date: 08/02/2016 Filename: South Frontenac-8ft Fence Budget Price-cust
Page 75 of 231
PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016
Planning Department County File No. 10T-2013/002
Date of Report: February 23, 2016 Subject: Draft Plan Conditions for Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession VII, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac: 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant)
SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council receive the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016, and forward the report and all attachments to the County of Frontenac as representing the Township’s conditions of draft plan approval for the proposed thirteen lot plan of subdivision by 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant) in the Hamlet of Hartington. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a plan of subdivision located in the Hamlet of Hartington. The plan proposes thirteen (13) residential lots and, as Council is aware, it has been changed from its original layout brought forward in July, 2015 where forty-seven (47) lots were proposed. A public meeting was held on July 7, 2015 on the original application as required by the Planning Act. This report includes a location map attachment, a lot layout plan, 3D images and reports supporting the development. Draft plan conditions are also attached. BACKGROUND Earlier in the year an application was brought to Council for a forty-seven (47) lot residential plan of subdivision in the Hamlet of Hartington, Portland District. An associated zoning by-law amendment was also presented for the new proposed residential uses. Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land partially within the Hamlet of Hartington. The County of Frontenac is the authority for final approval of subdivisions. The Planning Act requires that a public meeting be held on these types of applications and the County requested that the Township hold the public meeting on the subdivision as required under the Act. Accordingly, this public meeting was held on July 7, 2015. Feedback received from the public meeting indicated that there were concerns with developing the entire subdivision at the density proposed. The public comments focused on five major concerns namely:
- water quality and quantity – hydrog study was not done properly
- drainage and flooding – Pleasant Valley Drain already overflows
- effect on nearby farming – abutting farm could not expand
- lot frontages and aesthetics – too many lots, wartime houses
- most of the development is outside the hamlet designation – should only be in the hamlet The concerns expressed above, prompted the developer to reduce the scale of the subdivision from forty-seven lots to thirteen lots – all within the hamlet designation. The County of Frontenac has confirmed that the application has been officially revised to thirteen lots.
Page 76 of 231 The revised plan and proposed draft plan conditions were presented to the Committee of the Whole on November 24, 2015. At the meeting additional concerns were raised by the public through delegations. The concerns related to:
- remnant levels of hydrocarbons (from a former gas station on Road 38) that may still exist in the soil of the subject land and which may affect well water in the Plan and in neighbouring wells;
the direction of stormwater drainage which may affect neighbouring homes and overwhelm the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain System;
the high level of nitrates in the soil which may affect well water in the Plan and in neighbouring wells.
The discussion below concerning the revised plan now appears to address both sets of concerns noted above. DISCUSSION Comparing the revised plan with the former plan, the development would maintain the originally proposed layout in the north portion of the property with a new internal road (accessed from Boyce Road) on which all lots would front. The two parkland blocks have been removed along with the stormwater management block. Stormwater would now be directed away from the thirteen lots by way of ditches directing flow south through a right-of-way to the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain. Some drainage would also be directed northerly to Boyce Road. All lots would be a minimum of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) in size and would have 46 metres (151 ft.) of frontage. Cash-in-lieu of parkland is now proposed. The revised plan is shown on Attachment #2 and Attachment #3 is a three dimensional rendering of the final development indicating how it would fit within the existing community. It should be noted that the layout of the revised plan is designed to accommodate a future stage of development on the remainder of the existing acreage to the south, however, if and when this proposal comes forward it would constitute a new subdivision application requiring the normal full process for approval including a new public meeting. REVIEW The following is a review of relevant provincial and township documents and all information received on the proposal along with the Planning Department’s comments noted in bold type. General The area to be developed is 11 hectares (27 ac.) in size. The majority of the land may be characterized as being mainly flat having been tilled for crops in the past. The K&P Trail abuts the full eastern boundary from north to south and along this boundary are mature stands of trees that form a canopy over the trail. A farm exists on the abutting land to the west. The area to be developed is located fully within the Settlement Areas designation (Hartington) of the Official Plan. The location of the subject land generally appears to be well suited to accommodate residential development within the Settlement Areas Designation where the Official Plan prefers development to occur. Access to the subdivision would be by way of an entrance onto Boyce Road at the north of the development. A single new road would connect through the development providing the frontages for the lots and their direct access. The new road would be constructed to Township standards, with a turning bulb at its southern extent and would be dedicated to the Township. From a Planning perspective this is an appropriate layout for a residential subdivision in that traffic can be directed through an existing collector road to a nearby arterial road (Road 38) minimizing traffic volumes on the local roads. This layout scenario proposes development on a fully
Page 77 of 231 maintained public road properly constructed to provide efficient road maintenance. As noted above, a Township-maintained drainage ditch referred to as the “Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain System” is aligned east to west through the property to the south of the development. This passageway channels stormwater from neighbouring properties and directs it to a wetland approximately 5.5 kilometres to the west of the subject land. The drain must remain undeveloped and accessible to the Township for purposes of periodic maintenance. Accordingly, the developer has proposed that most of the stormwater be directed through ditches southerly to this drain to accommodate runoff. This scenario appears to be logical in that it ties in the stormwater management of the subdivision with the already established Pleasant Valley Drain. Public Works advises that they are satisfied that the Preliminary Stormwater Management Report dated August 10, 2015, sufficiently addresses drainage. It should be noted that there are legal matters associated with tying in new properties with the municipal drain. These will need to be addressed prior to final approval of the subdivision. All the proposed lots would be a minimum of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) in size and all would have a frontage on the new road of a minimum of 46 metres (151 ft.). The proposed sizes are supported by the hydrogeological study and terrain analysis (peer-reviewed) which determined the allowable density of the development and the configuration of the lots which would allow for appropriate building envelopes. Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement of 2014 provides policy direction from the province on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS states that efficient land use and development patterns should support sustainability by promoting strong, livable, healthy and resilient communities etc. Section 1.1 of the PPS says that developments should avoid land use patterns that prevent the efficient expansion of settlement areas in those areas which are adjacent to or are close to settlement areas. Also, developments should have patterns that are cost-effective and built to standards that minimize land consumption and servicing costs. The proposed development appears to be consistent with the direction of the Provincial Policy Statement in terms of its location and, as outlined above, the development pattern/layout is efficient and cost effective for maintenance, servicing and emergency response. It would not require expansion of the Hartington ‘Settlement Areas’ designation. Official Plan Referring to Attachment #1 of this report, the site is located where it can be accessed from a fully maintained public road and is in proximity to other residential development in the hamlet. As mentioned, it is fully within the ‘Settlement Areas’ designation boundary of Hartington. It is Council’s intention that the majority of new growth in the municipality will be directed to existing settlement areas where it can be supported by appropriate servicing. Single detached dwellings located on lots developed through a plan of subdivision are envisaged as the preferred method of development. The subdivision proposes thirteen residential lots all serviced by private water and septic systems and fronting onto a road to be constructed to Township standards and to be assumed by the municipality as a public road. In addition, the subject land is in a location where similar residential development has occurred and, despite an existing farm operation and a barn located to the west, there appear to be no incompatibility issues.
Page 78 of 231 In this regard, the subdivision seems well located and is near existing commercial uses in and near the village. It is also compatible with adjacent established residences and proposes recreation opportunities by providing a linkage with the existing K&P Trail. Consequently, the subdivision’s location appears to be fully in accordance with the intent of the Official Plan. Zoning The FoTenn consultant would zone the land to a special Residential Zone (R-28) to permit the residential use of the lands and to recognize the frontages as proposed at only 46 metres. Planning staff generally agree to this zoning scenario for the reason that the Comprehensive Zoning By-law reserves the Residential (R) zoning strictly for plans of subdivision lots and the minimum lot size of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) is specified in this zone category. The Planning Department can support the reduction of the normally required minimum lot frontages from 76 metres to a lesser frontage. This support is for two reasons: (1) The Official Plan, in section 7.2 (d), specifies that the minimum lot area and lot frontages of the plan of subdivision may be reduced if it is demonstrated through the subdivision process that reductions to these minimums can be justified based on good planning principles. A hydrogeological study and terrain analysis was undertaken to support the plan and it determined that there is enough water to accommodate the proposed density with the proper separation between septic fields and wells. This forms the basis to reduce the frontages. (2) The Official Plan policies relating to the land within the boundaries of the Settlement Areas designation do not suggest any minimum frontage requirement – presumably to allow increased densities here. From a planning perspective of course, this does not warrant that inappropriately small frontages are to be contemplated but the Official Plan is a guide and it does provide flexibility in this regard. Further Planning rationale is provided by FoTenn consultants in a letter, dated October 9, 2015, attached hereto as Attachment #4. Technical Studies Various studies were prepared and submitted in support of the original fortyseven lot development proposal and are still applicable. These studies consist of:
- a planning justification report,
- a Stage 1 and Stage 2 archaeological assessment,
- a hydrogeology study, servicing options & terrain analysis,
- a preliminary stormwater management report,
- a traffic impact review,
- an environmental impact assessment. Malroz Engineering Incorporated, under contract with the County of Frontenac, undertook a peer review of the hydrogeology a terrain analysis report and advised that all of their concerns have been addressed. Quinte Conservation also peer reviewed the report and agreed with its findings generally but recommended that a separate hydrogeological evaluation be performed on each residential well when it is installed. However, in addition to the above reviews, the firm of Mcintosh Perry was retained to undertake a further hydrogeological review of the development on behalf of the Hartington community. This review looked at the original hydrogeological report and outlined eight items of potential concern and concluded that additional investigation is required to support the development as proposed.
Page 79 of 231 In response, by letter dated October 29, 2015, ASC Environmental provided a response to the comments from McIntosh Perry. Some of the findings of note from ASC are as follows. Five of the original eleven test wells for the hydrogeological testing are located within the area of the thirteen lot development. The ASC review states “The pumping tests conducted on test wells TW02 and TW10 during August and September 2014 were undertaken following consultation and recommendation by Malroz Engineering and Quinte Conservation Authority to assess water supply during seasonal summer-like conditions. These wells were pumped for periods of 6 hours at rates of 20 litres per minute to account for seasonal variables in accordance with MOECC D-5-5. Results of the pumping tests clearly demonstrated water supply sufficient to support seasonal peak demand conditions. We are of the opinion that the test well pumping tests conducted in August and September, 2014 represent stressed conditions.” ASC further concludes that they agree with Malroz and McIntosh Perry that a higher level of investigation was warranted and, accordingly, they have advanced test wells, conducted additional field work and developed an analytic model to assess impacts demonstrating a level of investigation exceeding the minimum requirements on the MOECC D-5-5. ASC is committed to having each well installed at the site evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist. They concur with Malroz that all of the above work exceeds all ministry requirements and demonstrates long term water supply for the proposed thirteen lot subdivision to be developed in the north portion of the property. They also acknowledge that when further development is proposed, clearly, further terrain assessment will be required. A copy of the ASC, October 29, 2015 assessment is attached as Attachment #5. Councillor Sutherland has asked that the results of each well evaluation required above be shared with the public. Agency Comments The Planning Department’s comments are outlined above. However, Planning also wishes to make note of a concern for the stand of mature trees forming a canopy of shade along the K&P Trail on the east boundary of the subject land. Although it appears that the trees are located wholly on the Trail lands, the importance of maintaining these trees as an amenity for the trail-users and to enhance the general appeal of the subdivision lands should be emphasized and controls should be put in place to ensure the trees are conserved. Accordingly, Planning is recommending that a fence to demarcate the rear boundary of the lots abutting the trail be constructed to ensure that the boundary of the trail land is known and thereby to help protect the trees. Also, Planning will require a walkway link from the subdivision directly to the K&P Trail to provide formal pedestrian access to and from this amenity. Public Works appears to be generally supportive of the subdivision layout and finds the access areas to the subdivision to be acceptable. Also, as noted, they are satisfied that stormwater drainage is addressed by the Preliminary Stormwater Management Report. Public Works and Planning are recommending that the new road be paved with asphalt and that a sidewalk also be required from north to south on one side of the new road given that the development is within the hamlet designation - an urban setting. It is also required that services be installed underground within the road allowance of the new road. Public Comments One of the concerns from the public that was not addressed in the discussion above is the adverse effect on adjacent farming operations. The concern is that, with this residential development, any new well must be at least 1000 feet away from existing barns meaning that abutting farms would not be able to expand in the future ecause they would be near these new wells.
Page 80 of 231 This concern is well-founded because the Minimum Distance Separation Formula (MDS 2) would apply to prevent or severely limit any new farm facilities for animals from locating near these new residences. As a further note on Minimum Distance Separation, in terms of building near the existing barn on the abutting property to the west, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs’ Guidelines explain that, when any residential development is proposed within an area designated Settlement Areas, the MDS calculation need not apply. This is the case in the subject development as it is located in the Hartington Settlement Area. Additionally, the OMAFRA Guidelines provide that, if there are already four or more residences located closer to the livestock facility than the new proposed residences, then again, the MDS calculation is overruled and would no longer apply. Planning has included a condition in the attached draft plan conditions requiring that the final subdivision agreement include a clause notifying all prospective purchasers of the lots that a farm operates nearby and that related odours may be experienced. It is also noted that the hydrogeological report took the existence of the farm use into consideration during testing on the eleven wells drilled to determine whether ground water contamination from farm animals and the farm operation in general, would affect the water quality of the new wells. The report, peerreviewed, still came back with a positive recommendation. Concerns noted above regarding nitrates and hydrocarbons in the soil have been addressed by previous reports, notably Malroz Engineering and more recently, by letter dated December 3, 2015 from the firm of ASC Environmental. This letter concludes that:
adjacent residential septic systems and agricultural operations clearly have no potential for adverse influence on groundwater quality from nitrates in the soil, and
regarding hydrocarbons, there would be no adverse impacts from the property located at Holleford Road and Road 38 (former gas station) on the proposed Hartington Development.
In addition, letters dated January 18, 2016 and January 28, 2016 from Specialized Onsite Services Inc. (SOS) note that groundwater flow from the former gas station site is to the northeast ie., in the opposite direction from the subdivision and that no hydrocarbon impact was ever observed in supply wells at adjacent properties. Further, remediation work that was performed at the site in 2015 which involved excavation and removal of more than 250 tonnes of material has significantly reduced the potential for hydrocarbon migration. They conclude that the potential is very low that hydrocarbon impact from the site would migrate to the proposed wells in the subdivision. The SOS letters were also reviewed by Malroz Engineering who, by letter sent to the Township on February 19, 2016, agreed with the findings and confirmed that groundwater analyses conducted by SOS and Cambium Inc. revealed petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was below laboratory detection limits. Copies of the above letters are included hereto as Attachment #6. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended: A. That Council receive the recommendations contained in the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016 and approve the following list of recommended conditions as representing the Township of South Frontenac’s ‘Conditions of Draft Plan Approval’ for the thirteen lot Plan of Subdivision by Terry Grant, in the Hamlet of Hartington:
Page 81 of 231
- That this conditional approval applies to the draft plan of proposed subdivision dated September 18, 2015 prepared and certified by Forefront Engineering Inc., and Smith & Smith Surveyors, comprising a total of thirteen residential lots, two blocks and a new street.
- That the owners of the subject land enter into a subdivision agreement with the Township of South Frontenac, prepared to the satisfaction of the municipality, to be registered on title of the subject land.
- That the road allowance included in this draft plan shall be identified as Street ‘A’ and shall be constructed to Township standards for new public roads with paved asphalt surfacing and that the road be dedicated as a public highway.
- That the new internal road identified as ‘Street ‘A’ be named to the satisfaction of the municipality.
- That Boyce Road be upgraded at the entrance to the subdivision to the Township’s satisfaction to facilitate ingress and egress.
- That Centralized Community Mail Boxes be installed at a location on the road allowance of Street ‘A’ near the entrance to the development at Boyce Road along the west side of the road allowance of the new road and to the satisfaction of the Township and in accordance with Canada Post specifications.
- That a 0.3 metre reserve be identified by survey along Lot 13 where the lot abuts the road allowance of Boyce Road and at the south end of Street ‘A’ and around the circumference of the turning bulb at the south end of Street ‘A’ to be held in trust by the municipality for the purpose of denying additional access onto Boyce Road and the undeveloped lands to the south.
- That the Owner install a 1.5 metre wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of the new road allowance from the northern limit of Street ‘A’ (i.e., from Boyce Road), to the southern limit of Lot 7.
- That a 1.5 metre high black continuous chain link fence be installed along the rear lot lines of Lots 7 to 13 abutting the K&P Trail to protect the existing mature stand of trees on the trail lands.
- That the owner convey up to five percent of the land included in the plan to the municipality for park purposes. Alternatively, the municipality may require cash-in-lieu for all or a portion of the conveyance.
- That prior to final approval, the County of Frontenac is to be advised by the municipality that this proposed subdivision conforms to the Zoning By-law in effect of the Township of South Frontenac including that the zoning is satisfactory to Quinte Conservation Authority.
- That all conditions outlined in the letter dated June 2, 2015 from Quinte Conservation Authority to the County of Frontenac, be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality including the requirement for a draw down test for each individual well to be installed and including testing to confirm that nitrate levels are at an acceptable level.
- That, the subdivision agreement include a requirement that any abandoned wells must be decommissioned according to MOECC guidelines.
Page 82 of 231 14. That the recommendations outlined in the letter dated December 12, 2014 from KFL&A Public Health to Terry Grant Construction 1278804 Ontario Inc., be addressed to the satisfaction of the municipality for the thirteen lot development. 15. That, prior to final approval, a Final Stormwater Management Report and detailed engineering drawings addressing grading, drainage and stormwater management be submitted to the satisfaction of the Township and Quinte Conservation Authority for the thirteen lot development. The site drainage, design, construction and maintenance shall be in accordance with the recommendations contained in the final Stormwater Management Report, with all final designs incorporated into the subdivision agreement. 16. That all legal matters associated with tying the stormwater from the development into the Pleasant Valley Municipal Drain system be resolved to the satisfaction of the Township. 17. That all requirements and recommendations specified in the Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analyses Report, dated October 31, 2013, from ASC Environmental, updated by covering letter dated October 7, 2015 from ASC Environmental, and all associated drawings be complied with for the thirteen lot development. 18. That the recommendations of the Natural Heritage Report, dated August 27, 2013 from Ecological Services, be complied with for as they apply to the thirteen lot development. 19. That all entrances to the lots including entrance culverts be located and constructed to the satisfaction of the Township. 20. That all servicing including Bell, Hydro etc. be installed underground. 21. That all recommendations of the Archaeological Assessment (Stage 1 & 2) Reports, dated September 16, 2013 by Archeworks Inc. be implemented to the satisfaction of the Township for the thirteen lot development. 22. That, prior to final approval, street lighting shall be installed to the satisfaction of the municipality including lighting at the turning bulb at the south end of the development and at the entrance to the development at Boyce Road such lighting to also illuminate the mail boxes to be located there. 23. That the Subdivision Agreement include text to the satisfaction of the Township, which text shall be registered on the title of all lots, that all Agreements of Purchase and Sale include provisions advising that a farming operation exists to the west and that adverse effects may be experienced. 24. That, prior to final approval, a 3.0 metres wide walkway be constructed along the south lot line of Lot 7 from the south end Street ‘A’ to the K&P Trail to provide access from the subdivision to the Trail, such walkway to be constructed to the satisfaction of the Township, to be paved 1.3 metres wide with asphalt and to include a 1.2 metre high continuous black coloured chain link fence along the full length of the walkway on both the north and south sides 25. That, prior to final approval, the municipality shall be satisfied that all servicing issues are resolved such as road, sidewalk and walkway construction.
Page 83 of 231 26. That prior to final plan approval, the Owner shall submit a Landscape Plan which provides for one tree to be planted by the Owner in the front yard of each of the lots (Lots 1-13) as well as a planting area or screening buffer of trees along the side yard of Lot 13 where it abuts the road allowance of Boyce Road all of a type, size and location as specified in the Township’s Site Plan Guidelines. 27. That, prior to final approval, a six foot high board screen fence be installed along the north side lot line of Lot 1 for a distance of 70 metres westerly from the new street to provide a measure of privacy in the rear yard of the abutting existing residential lot on Boyce Road. 28. That the owner agree in writing to satisfy all the requirements, financial and otherwise of the municipality concerning the provision/upgrading of roads, installation of services and drainage, in accordance with the municipality’s standards and procedures.
B. That the Planning Report dated February 23, 2016, including attachments, be forwarded to the County of Frontenac as representing the Township’s conditions of draft plan approval for the thirteen lot Hartington Plan of Subdivision.
Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills Prepared by: Lindsay Mills, attachments HartingtonDraftPlanConditionsToCouncil
Page 84 of 231
&
Attachment #1
W
lllmllm& s ia *
s -wa
n
m
! i nl
fl
‘!
M
?=}aVld4 .OY[;t Kupu
[] t
- lllillmllwlllmll
s s w # F? s s s @ s * i
r’
Li
I
.ThJHamlet Boundaryl
illmllmlll
r
l
r?x
l
l
.?AMIE5(IN ta)AU
nr
TWORH-lKtJAu?
[7
w
-I
]
h
l n
n
C3[
ff
.!l!) 01
‘fi-1 ‘FORD’ KOAu..eub t
-? a - . . . ,
iADW
‘?
s
0 wa w
[] air s
[1 w wa
(]
ff?
!?’! wx
[1 s
o
i.l
m
u
El
[] w wa
n
l 1
?-‘r
Page 85 of 231
ATTACHMENT #2 i
i’ ‘r J I’
‘-J
11 K7P OIJ?
?i
.ia?
?-l -2)
RED UNDER 4NNINC ACT k
a-l
s Hwe An Intetgst
:tui Hydto
l7:?’
LOT 4
11
i:?
‘11
r
i
i?’
Ama :0.80 he
ra
:ORPORA TION
(
i’
( .=?
BVIDED r ARE
.?’l’,’
? <l
.s.
l
.1,4" i (? X .a??? '
l
i I ‘.
i.
( .H
E
–??t
??’- -L’o /a??’ /?
il ?
l
I,‘a
l’-?
’l
la
l l
f’
a?’ I ?.!%p’l? 4 .? -0.4-lr’
l
l
C
a,l ,,,/ a
r
-l k
=-,l-
it t
Page 86 of 231
kl
1’l
l
l
l
T
l
l
r
ffl
@’ L F)’? ff,‘111 lfflm&‘J’al
r
1111
WF
l’
1
l
r
t
l
I
W
l
it
l tli( r?
L
I
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
t
n
!
1
l
i
l) l
I
l 1
I
11
L
l
t
!j
l
11
l
il
l
i
s
i
l
‘14
it
l l i
i
I
l
t i
z
l
l
1
l
ll
m
I
l
l
l
l
i
t
i
{l
o’ LT=’
l
l
l
I
Fl!l
l
l
l t
‘1
ll!i
=‘nJ U
i
z
l l
l
l
I
J
t
’l i!
t
l z l
s
2p-!=-:!f’-J2,
I
l l
t
l
?
I
i l
l
l
l
i
l
e
-’=’-F..'=
i
t
i
.“i:a
l
I
l
s
I
l
l
l
I i
l?
l l
t
‘-‘7-.=-’
I
s
r
l
l
i i
l
l
i
I
l
l
l
l
t l
I
a
l
l
I
r
I
I
i.
l
l
l
l l
I
T
I
l
[1d
it Im m!!!W %i [m il iil
l
t
f?Nl
l
s
l
l
t
l
l
I
i
l
I
ll
l
i
l
l
I r
I
l
t
s
l
i
1
II?J lai
ll
l
ATTACHMENT #3
? Proposed Lot Fabric 00 Existing Lot Fabric
L.
‘al !
%#
M
%;
d
;*
l
r
2
N
j
.’%
%
11 11 s ffi.
’l
!l
?
g
‘)A l
%-
l& N
a l
%=
$5 m
11’
41
k
(%Vl
d
V
s
l *
%
i l z
r
l
l
l
‘%
€%-’:-
=@a -@@-
wagfih I
M?
%”
W
1
l l
l
l i
l
l l
l
l t
r J
p
-*
7 p
0?’
%
<
A
l
l
yw
? 1 r
l
l
7
40!? !
i l t l t
r
l
l
l l
%.
7
r
l i [1
l
l
i I
? Proposed Lot Fabr!c ? Existing lot Fabric
l-)L,ANNiNG BRiEF ! HA,R-l-INGTON S(-18DlV)SlONi ZBA & DRAFI- Pl.-AN OF SL)BDIV?SION
8
Page 87 of 231 *
ATTACHMENT #4
The Woolen Mill
6 Cataraqui St, Suite 108 Kingston, ON K7K 127 613.542.5454
fotenn.com
October 9, 2015
Joe Gallivan
Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road
Glenburnie, ON KOH 150
Re: Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment Planning E!rief
Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac File Nos.: 10T-2013/002 and Z-15/03
Dear Mr. Gallivan,
The following submission is being provided to advise the County of revisions made to the proposed residential subdivision in Hartington. The original application sought to create 50 new blocks, including 47 residential lots, two parkland blocks and one stormwater management block. This letter is intended to supplement the original planning rationale, dated June 11, 2015, which was submitted in support of the development applications. Feedback received during the Statutory Public Meeting and through written correspondence indicates there are concerns with developing the entire subdivision, due to the fact that the property is Iocated partly within a settlement area and partly witt’iin the rural area. Concerns were also raised regarding vvater quality and quantity.
The applicant has thoughtfully considered this feedback from the community and has reduced the subdivision to 13 residential lots, all of which will be located within the existing hamlet boundary. The remainder of the lands will not be part of the subdivision
application and will remain rural. When the applicant pursues the development of the
southern portion of the property in the future, the planning process will trigger further consultation with the County and Township Council, staff and the Public. OVERVIEW OF REVISED DESIGN
As seen in Figure 1 below, the reviser3 plan now includes 13 residential lots, a road and the remainder of the lands are not part of the Plan of Subdivision. The two parkland blocks originally proposed have been removed along with the stormwater management block. Stormwater will be directed away from the 13 lots by enhanced ditches. The proposed new road will terminate at the end of Iots 6 and 7. The right-of-way will continue south for stormwater management purposes, providing a direct connection from the proposed roadside ditches to the existiiig Pleasant Valley Muriicipal Drain. Cash-in-Iieu of parkland will be provided instead of the originally proposed parkland blocks.
r"I…Ai’iNlNG BRIEF ? HAR’ilNGai-Otll SLIBr)IS/)SION ? ZBA & DF!AFT Pi-AN OF SUBDlVISIOl’%l
Page 88 of 231
TECHNICAL CONSIDERAT?ONS
Hydrogeology
ASC Environmental has reviewed the revised draft plan and has provided an updated analysis for the proposed 13 residential lots. Based on MOE guidelines, a minimum of 3
test-wells is requir6a for sites up to 15 hectares (the reduced development area is
approximately 11 hectares in size of the 45 hectare property). Currently, five drilled wells are present in the area proposed for development and a sixth well is immediately south and adjacent to the now Lot 7. On this basis, sufficient wells are in place to address the hydrogeological conditions for the proposed Hamlet development. W@,%er Supply
Pumping tests vvere conducted on the test wells in 2013 and 2014. VVater supply has been assessed during spring and summer conditions with pumping test results from the s existing wells confirming sufficient water supply to support development of the 13 proposed Iots within the Hamlet. Based on the hydroeological work completed to date (and confirmatory peer reviews), ASC is of the opinion that the well driller’s pumping tests for the remaining 8 Iots will be sufficient to assess potential well yield to confirm long term viability of each lot. Water Quality
Existing groundwater chemistry data from the test wells identified that treatment for common aesthetic parameters and health related parameters may be necessary in the Hamlet portion of the property. Bacteriological parameters are not a concern. During individual lot development, disinfection is recommended as a minimum to ensure safe drinking water for domestic consumption purposes and retaining a water treatment
specialist to confirm treatment options for the identified aesthetic and health related parameters that may require treatment.
?
Water levels vvere measured in test wells and observation wells in the northern portion of the property during pumping tests conducted in March 2013, August 2014 and September 2014. The results indicated a positive response during all three test times and exceeded the requirements of MOE’s guidelines.
Based on these results ASC is of the opinion that the hydrogeological analysis conducted to date and the evaluation of new wells by a qualified hydrogeologist is sufficient to adequately characterize long term water supply of the proposed 13 lot residential development.
Stormwater Management
As noted above, stormwater is proposed to be managed through enhanced ditches. Rear ditches will be provided along the east and west property lines to capture runoff from the rear portions of the proposed Iots. The proposed roadside ditches would still capture runoff from the roadvvay, driveways, roofs, and front portions of the proposed lots. These roadside ditches would be extended northerty to Boyce Road to
accommodate any future road drainage works envisioned there. The existing low lying area adjacent to the rail trail in the northeast corner of the site will still be drained through a ditch along a side lot line to the proposed roadside ditch. At the south limit of the road, a Iinear enhanced ditch will be extended southerly to the Pleasant Valley Drain.
This lot-slope, grass Iined, flat bottom ditch will be designed to provide ‘4tormvtater quantity and quality control for the 13 lot development. Side and rear ditches as well as Pl-A.NNlNt3 BR)EFI HAR-i-INGTON SUBi)MSIOhii ZBA & DRAFT PL.AN OF SUBDlVfSION
3
Page 89 of 231 1
lot grading would be detailed on the engineering drawings and in the subdivision agreement.
A final Stormwater Management report will be completed with detailed design. Environmental Impact Statement
An Environmental Impact Assessment was prepared by Ecological Services dated August 27, 2013. This report assessed the natural features on the property to determine significance in accordance with provincial and municipal Iegislation. The work included site visits and analysis of aerial photography. Conclusions of the assessment include: *
No threatened or endangered species within the subject property Bobolinks observed on adjacent properties, hovvever they are known to be tolerant of nearby human activity and the proposed subdivision will not constitute a negative impact to this species
There are no wetlands within 120 metres of the proposed development area There are no areas of natural and scientific interest within 120 metres of the proposed development area
0
There are no valleylands within 120 metres of the proposed development area Existing woodland is not of significant size, habitat, proximity to a significant natural heritage feature, linkage, groundwater discharge area, or diversity to be considered significant in the context of provincial or municipal regulations. The subject property does not contain any significant woodlands.
Tt’iere are no significant wildlife habitat present within the proposed development area
The findings of the previously prepared Environmental Impact Assessment are not impacted by the revised draft plan of subdivision. Traffic Impact F?evievv
A Traffic Impact Review was completed by AECOM on S.@ptember 2, 2015. Trip
generation rates rom the ITE Trip Generation Manual (9 Edition) were used to estimate the number of trips generated by the development. Traffic Counts along Road 38 were also utilized in their findings including turning movements. AECOM’s traffic counts vvere consistent with the counts provided by the Township.
The additional traffic qenerated by the residential development represents less than 10% of the total traffic along Road 38. With such low volumes of new traffic, no impact to the existing traffic operations is expected. It was also determined that there should be sufficient gaps in the traffic along Road 38 such that northbound left turning vehicles on Road 38 will be able to access Boyce Road with little delay. Comments from Quinte Conservation
Quinte Conservation has accepted the development subject to two conditions:
- Any new development on the subject Iand should demonstrate that postdevelopment flows do not exceed pre-development Ievels for design storms from the S-year to 100-year events. In addition, the Level 2 (normal) water quality protection storage criteria set out in the Ministry of the Environment Stormwater
PLANN)NG BRIEF :, HARTiNGTON S()BDI’:/lSIOi'41 ZBA &. DR.AFT Pl.-AN Ol= SUBL)lVISiC’iN
zi
Page 90 of 231
Management Planning and Design Manual (2003) should be utilized for this application. Please note, staff have reviewed a covering letter provided by Forefront Engineering Inc. (dated August 10, 20i5) and agree with the conceptual stormwater management design. We suggest however, that the Municipality consider the need for an easement over all drainage features (including rear lot swales) with access from Municipal property. Please contact Christine McClure, Water Resources Technologist at 613-968-3434 x 130 for further information regarding stormwater management comments.
- Quinte Conservation suggests that a hydrogeological study be conducted which includes a baseline survey and evaluation of potential impacts on groundwater. We recommend that the consultant utilize the guidelines set forth in the Ministry of Environment (MOE) document titled ‘216905 D-s-s Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment (1996)’ and, ‘216904 D-s-4 Individual On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment (1996)’. Please note, staff have been in discussion with the consulting hydrogeologist and the Municipality’s peer review agent. Please contact Mark Boone, Hydrogeologist at 613-968-3434 x 120 for further information regarding the hydrogeological comments.
PLANNING CONSIDERAT?ONS
The subject property is regulated by the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-Law. !t is currently zoned within the “RU” Rural Zone which permits a range of uses including agricultural and related uses, single-detached dwellings, and other uses which are considered compatible with rural areas. There is a small area of “Environmentally Sensitive Lands Overlay” on the west side of property which requires an Environmental Impact Assessment with any development application (completed with the initial application). The existing and surrounding zoning is shown in Figure 2 below.
Pl-ANI’!ING BF’:liEF : I-IART?NG’T-ON S(.)BDR/ISIONIZBA & DRAFT Pl-AN OF SUBDR/ISION
.)
Page 91 of 231
?
l
, See Schedule E Hartington
UCI
LLJ I
l
wa
FloHice Fktl
l
?
r
v
1
1
k
’n
n
11 t l
i
r
l
l
luci-l
t
l
I l
t I
ltl
l
I
lt
l
Property
r
-L%
l
Siibject
l
11
I
l
l
l
I
l
t
l
t
l
I
I
L
l
l
11
t
’l
J
11
lcisp k"l
r
l
r
‘I
i
‘?
l
l
l
l L?
l
.10.All%Q..iJ(ig)ip 00 hcsicuuvnky zow? iai llUll.kL ZOI’lF illu.’
‘.NAT[nrllOl-ll nESIDEN{:AL l.OltE lllla7 {.lMilTD S’.AVl’:i IlCTilD!:I’lTlAl. ZONE llll.sl
l
‘1
t
-’?
IFlAl’klRkRV IJ!‘F ZrnlF
U?IIIAN INI?US IIIIAI. iDNk IUII
? pirr*-zc’vcini Pl!?’.l'20N&kTY!}
ul.{l n:+s sbiwce pesiot:bniy. . wmrwirosi+ rove imsiyi 05 rwprcv?ii? ztisc ioi.i IIMI IEO SERV:Ci-. llESlci’ENslAl ? lSl.AND ZOl*e iRLSit
OIIARRV ?li ’ lOyl’ tOBi
Rh81l}[?Il’lAl 711’lF IRj
WASIP (l:SP(ISAI- ZONF. lsM!’:
Jlllil l l 101)Ig Ilr XlllE+l’l IAI ?C??IF ll.ll llki
1.1(iBrs+l IEulrklNl’iAy . 141lToT DflN?l {V .anNE iklll l l
IRI?{AN RESIIXN IIA{ ? SlCoND DEN!‘1lY 20NE IUll2) ull}iAN Isl’.l+ llPl.E RESCENrlAk IONF IU!.lla.j
‘§ffl TIU?IAI coz*yepcihi. zouv llle) RC’JkCAl IONAI. l’T[SORT ‘..Clkl M[ nC.lAl. 2CN’lE i RC !
01 uia@y ct)vihvrciht ZONE iuci I?URAI. lNDllS7RlA+ 20011 i;11
.QALVAGE YAIID INDUST?IIAI ZONE llili
‘fflffl cawuyirr yr.r.iyny zow- icvi ClPEll SlaACe ? Pua(IC ZOLI? 11)S! CW!l SPl.CL ? l’l’llVMr ?(M lllRPi
rM’vM{GllrYlllAkLY SENsll’M.’ l.llNDS CNCllkl8 Cl!VlllOl€-I.VNla{ n!IrrTeCLluL]2CNr krPl
- iSee gkVlbn S :l7 101 CM?l?Dmnkl willlin
- LlNlRONlAElsrALLV 8F)181l’lE IANDSI
" ’ l HA?AIF?R
Figure 2: Current Zoning
We are proposing that the 13 residential lots be zoned a site specific Residential “R-28’ zone which is an established zone within the Township. The remainder of the larids would be zoned the existing ‘RU’ Rural Zone (Figure 3). The table below provides a comparison between the parent Residential zone and the amendments necessary for the site specific zone.
Parent R Zone
Minimum Lot Area: 8,000 m
Relief Necessary .
-’-0.80 hectares 48,000-m’) -
No
46m
Yes - Request reduction to
2
Minimum Lot Frontage: 76 m
Provided
a minimum of 46 m
Troritaqe.
PLAN!‘ilNG BPIEFI ldAR l-li’lGTON SUBDMSIONI ZBA. & DR.A=i l- PLAN OF SUBD?V?SION
6
Page 92 of 231
Minimum Yard
Development will meet
’ Requirements ’ these requirements. Frorit Yard: 20 m
F2ear Yard: 10 m , Int. Side Yard:6 m Ext. Side Yard: 10 m
Gross Floor Area (min): 89 sq. m
Maximum Building Height: 11 m
Maximum Lot Coverage:
, 20%
Development will meet these requiremerits. Development will meet these requirements.
No relief requested
Development will meet
No relief requested.
No relief requested.
.1
’ these requirements. l-….. -.-…….. -……. . … -…..-.-
Frontage Reduction
The Draft Plan provides O.8 hectare lots with a minimum Iot frontage of 46 metres. Overall, the draft plan is consistent with the general intent of the Official Plan and as such, we believe the relief requested for the zoning amendment is justified. Proposed residential lots will be located on private services and at O.8 hectares (2 acres), each Iot has sufficient space to meet the required setbacks for well and septic systems, including a back-up tile bed. Lots will also contain sufficient space for those wishing to have accessory buildings or accessory uses such as a swimming pool.
By providing sufficiently sized lots on a municipal road and by maintaining all other provisions of the Residential ‘R’ zone, the subdivision will achieve a scale and character similar to that of the surrounding hamlet. The images below provide a sense of the how the proposed subdivision will appropriately integrate with surrounding uses. It is important to note how much smaller the existing residential lots, but that the character is maintained with these small lots by providing a similar frontage to the existing Iots.
Pl…Al’!NING BR?EFI HARTINGTON SUBDR/IS?ON : ZBA & DRAF?r F?LAN OF SUBDIVISION
-.’
Page 93 of 231
aa-
=.. $!a
i
?tt
&Th
II?W ;.1
g
FW
a
HFI
t!
ta
-W’?l.?.
r&
nq
Th IW’i
+Q
- ?l1a
al’
N
*m??i
%w?
-;l
? ‘@g lljiffli f m ‘%’
aJ a e
!!l
( :!F?
As seen in the images above, the frontages proposed are consistent with the general character of the area. They are also consistent with other decisions made in the Township to reduce frontage within the hamlet areas. Some examples include:
R-10 - Lyons Landing, 55 m R-11 - Bedford District, 60 m R-18 - Gilbert, 30 m R-21 - Deer Creek Phase 2, 35 m R-25 & R-26 - Valleyview Estates, 25 m R-27 - Ouellette, 50 m R-28 - Willowbrook Estates, 52 m
In summary, the only provision requiring relief is the Iot frontage, which is proposed to be reduced from 76 metres to 46 metres. The reduction will not disrupt the functionality of
the subdivision nor will it result in a Iot fabric that is out of character with the surrounding area.
The site specific zoning text will read:
R-29 (Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of Portland)
Notwithstanding anything in this by-law to the contrary, the Iands zoned Special Residential (R-X) shall be used only in accordance with the following: i. The minimum lot frontage shall be 46 m (150.9 ft). it. All other provisions of this by-Iaw shall apply.
PLANNING BF’!IEFI HAF:":lNG’i ON SLlBDl’l/ISIONI ZBA & DRAF’T Pl?.AN OF SUBDIVISION
9
Page 94 of 231
-) J 1% ?l
R-29 ll 11 11 =l
l
‘I l
l
.1
r
l
l
I
i
l
l
l
I
ll
l
l
l
11 I
l
:l it
RU
la
i
l
il
l
ll-
a
l
’l
l
’l .1
l
41
-lt-.-.-. -o
Figure 3: Proposed Zoning
Pl?Ah-‘NING BRIEFI HARTINGTON SUBDi’y/ISION : ZBA 8=t Dt-!AFT PL?AN OF SUBDlVlSIOiSl
10
Page 95 of 231
CONCLUSIONS
As a result of comments received from the public, the applicant has significantly reduced the scale of the proposed subdivision. The original proposal, which included 47 residential lots, two parkland blocks and one stormwater management block has beeri reduced to 13 residential Iots all located within the settlement area of Hartington. Lands Iocated outside of the hamlet area will remain as rural and will be subject to an additional planning process when the owner proposes future development options for the lands.
Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 613-542-5454 extension 221.
Sincerely,
ffi?s,.?? Mike Keene, RPP MCIP
Manager Policy + Development FOTENN Consullr,nts Inc.
PI?ANNING BRiEFI HARTING?-ON SLJBDl’v"lSIONI ZBA & DRAF’i PL?AN OF SUB[)R/ISION
l’i
Page 96 of 231
[?
ATTACHMENT #f
October 29, 2015
Via: email
File: ASC-095 ll61
Mr. Terry Grant T. Grant Custom Homes 946 Woodbine Road
Kingston, ON K7P 2X5
Subject: Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Response to Technical Comments from Mclntosh Perry Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hamlet of Hartington, Ontario Dear Mr. Grant:
We present our comments on the technical review from Mclntosh Perry regarding the above captioned properly. We reviewed the following documents:
Review Technical Support Documentation - Hartington Subdivision, Part Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (MP File No. OCP-15-O397), prepared for Ms. Michelle Foxton, Mr. Charlie Larbarge and Mr. John Lesperance, prepared by Mclntosh Perry, dated September 1, 2015.
Review of Mclntosh Perry Letter Dated September 1, 2015 Review Technical Support Documentation - Hartington Subdivision Part Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac (MP File No. OCP-15-0397), prepared for County of Frontenac, prepared by Malroz Engineering, dated September 24, 2015. We offer the following comments in order of Mclntosh Perry Technical Review: 1.O Comments
Pumping tests were undertaken in March 2013. Four (4) test wells were pumped simultaneously on March 19 and another four (4) on March 21 , 2013. Three of the eight test wells (TWO1 , TWO2, TVS/03) are located in the proposed 13 Lot subdivision and test well (TWO4) is located immediately south of the proposed development. These wells are representative of the expected water supply available for the proposed 131ots.
491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1,/9
(sqs) 634 - 5596
Page 97 of 231 Page 2
File: ASC-095 1161 T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON
October 29, 2015
Precipitation the month preceding the March, 2C)13 pumping tests primarily consisted of snow fall. Referencing the Hartington Station approximately 30 mm of rain fall occurred the month preceding the pumping tests and approximately 47 cm of snowfall. At the time of the pumping tests, snow cover was still observed on the ground and sheet flow was also noted in areas over the frozen ground surface. We acknowledge that the March, 20’l3 pumping tests are not representative of typical summer Iow supply seasonal conditions. We note that the pumping tests were conducted to stress these wells to assess performance during early seasonal conditions.
Test wells TWO1 and TWO3 were pumped at rates varying from 20 Iitres per minute up to 60 litres per minute during the March, 2013 pumping tests generating approximately 25,000 litres of water. This is equivalent to approximately 14 Lots (14 times the daily requirement for a 3 plus one bedroom residence). Test wells TWO2 and TWO4 were pumped two days later generating approximately 42,000 Iitres of water; equivalent to 23 Lots (23 times the daily requirement). The pumping tests demonstrated that sufficient quantity of water is available to support residential development within the Hamlet.
Approximately 134 mm of precipitation (rain) was recorded at the Hartington Station the month preceding the summer pumping tests in 2014. Mclntosh Perry identified 156 mm of precipitation the month preceding the summer pumping tests. It should be noted that approximatily 46 mm of the rainfall was recorded on one day.
Based on our infiltration calculation for annual precipitation, approximately 20% is available to the aquifer. If we take 20% of the monthly rainfall prior to summer 2014 testing (134 mm) then W! have approximately 27 mm of precipitation aaa ala= infi trating the ground, “-a? or 27 L/m , which when mul’ tiplied by the proposed site area of 11 Ha, gives us approximately 3,036,000 L of precipitation infiltrating the ground suface the month prior to testing.
The average aquifer thickness of test wells TWO1 , TWO3, TWO9 and TWI 0 is 27.4 m in summer 2014. This multiplied by the site area (11 Ha) and then
multiplied by the porosity of Iimestone which Freeze and Cherry report up to O.2 gives 6.0258 x 1 048 litres available in the aquifer. If we use a conservative porosity of limestone (0.1 ), we have approximately 301 ,290,000 litres available in the aquifer for pumping. The contribution from precipitation the month preceding the summer pumping tests in 2014 is approximately 1 % of the total amount of water available in the aquifer. This clearly is not a significant contribution to the aquifer prior to the summer pumping tests.
[?
491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1J9
(613) 634 - 5596
Page 98 of 231
File: ASC-095 ll61 T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 1 3 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON
Page 3
October 29, 201 s
MOECC D-s-s, Section 4.3.I Pump Test Procedure requires the pumping test must begin with a static water Ievel and must be performed at a fixed rate (+5%) for a minimum period of six hours. The minimum duration of six continuous hours incorporates safety factors with respect to seasonal variables. The pumping tests conducted on test wells TWO2 and TW1 0 during August and September 2014 were undertaken following consultation and recommendation by Malroz Engineering and Quinte Conservation Authority to assess water supply during seasonal summer-like conditions. These wells were pumped for periods of 6 hours at rates of 20 Iitres per minute to account for seasonal variables in accordance with MOECC D-s-s. Results of the pumping tests clearly demonstrated water supply sufficient to support seasonal peak demand conditions. We are of the opinion that the test well pumping tests conducted in August and September 2014 represent stressed conditions.
Referencing Mclntosh Perry Technical Review, they acknowledge that “the pumping test conducted for test well TWO2 demonstrates that it has an adequate yield”. Also the additional work conducted to date clearly supports long term water supply assessment in accordance MOECC D-s-s procedure. 2)
Mclntosh Perry acknowledges that test well (?iWO2) demonstrates adequate yield to support residential develepment.
We concur with Malroz; the Precambrian granite is not intended for use as a water supply aquifer in the evaluation of the development. 3)
The MOECC Procedure D-s-s, requires a minimum of a 6 hour pumping test and that at least one water sample is to be collected in the last hour of the test. We concur with Malroz that collection of a second sample is at the discretion of the consultant. During pumping tests, samples were collected following measuring raw water to be free of chlorine residual. Second and or final water samples from the
eleven wells analysed were typically targeted for collection in the Iast hour of the pumping tests.
We concur with Malroz that the water quality data generated to date from the test wells sampled and, the recommendation that each new well be evaluated, are adequate for characterizing the raw water quality.
[’;?
491 0’ConnorDtive, Kingston, ON K7P IJ9
(613) 634 - 5596
Page 99 of 231 Page 4
File: ASC-095 1 1 61 T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments
Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON
October 29, 2015
Based on our field groundwater monitoring information to date and monitoring of adjacent residential wells, groundwater flow gradient in the area is primarily to the south. Neighbouring residents to the east and north east along Boyce Road and near Highway 38 in the vicinity of the gasoline retail outlet demonstrate a north to northeast/east component of groundwater flow; away from the proposed subdivision. The gasoline retail outlet in question was renovated in 2013, including removal of underground storage tanks, upgrading to double walled tanks and replacing fuel distribution piping. We understand the site was certified by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority indicating the retail outlet is in compliance with Provincial regulatory environmental approvals.
Residential neighbours north, south and east of the retail operation have been present for over 20 to 50 years. During our hydrogeological study, neighbours were solicited to participate in the hydrogeological study. We typically received concerns regarding potential hydrogen sulphide odours in the water supply. No concerns were raised by adjacent residents regarding petroleum hydrocarbon odours in the water supply, clearly indicating the adjacent retail fuel outlet is not a concern.
On this basis, and taking into account recent upgrades (2013) to the gasoline retail store and demonstrated groundwater flow gradient away from the proposed subdivision we are of the opinion that concerns to water supply quality from the retail outlet are not warranted.
Mclntosh Perry identified the walking trail (former K&P railway) located east of the proposed subdivision as a potential concern to future development. We understand the walking trail (forrner rail line) has been in use for recreational purposes in some form since the late l980s. The trail was officially opened in August, 2012. The former rail bed is over 100 years old and ceased operation in 1983 and tracks removed circa 1986. Referencing the County of Frontenac K&P Trail Implementation Plan 2009, a residential survey was taken to gauge environmental, economic and general concerns regarding proposed upgrades to the trail. Reviewing the responses from existing residents adjacent to the trail, no environmental concerns were identified regarding potential impairment of water quality to wells resulting from the former rail bed. This is further supported from our residential survey conducted in support of the hydrogeological study, where no concerns were identified regarding water quality issues resulting from the former rail bed.
491 0’ConnorDrive, /Gngston, ON
[g,$,]
K7P 1J9
(613) 634 - 5596
,g
Page 100 of 231
Page s
File: ASC-095 1161 T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses
October 29, 2C)15
Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON 5)
Quinte Conservation in discussion with Malroz indicated that a Provincial
Groundwater Monitoring Network well is Iocated in the vicinity of Hartington. Mr. Mark Boone, Hydrogeologist with Quinte Conservation confirmed as a part of the water quality evaluation program in the area, that water analyzed for radionuclide did not identifya concerns. On this basis we are satisfied that radionuclides in the water supply are not a concern for future development. 6)
We have reviewed the nitrate-nitrite concentrations for the eleven (11) test wells sampled for the full 45 hectare property. Five of the eleven sampled test wells are located in the northern portion of the property proposed for development. Nitratenitrite results ranged from O.1 mg/l to 4.21 mg/l with the majority of the results falling into two ranges (0.1 - 0.75 mg/I and 1 .5 - 3.0 mg/l) with one result of 4.21 mg/l (TW1 0); confirming nitrate-nitrite variability. We believe the nitrate concentration detected at TW-10 is an outlier and not representative of background concentrations at the property. We concur that the result represents a conservative approach, we do not concur that it is representative of current background concentrations based on the results of the sampling program from the 11 sampled wells.
Thirteen (13) Iots are proposed within the Hamlet, with the remainder of the property being vacant for the foreseeable future. On this basis and utilizing the full 45 hectare property for nitrate dilution, the anticipated nitrate loading for the proposed 13 lots at the south downgradient boundary would be well below the 10 mg/l criteria (MOE Procedure D-s-4).
When further development is proposed clearly further terrain assessment will be required to determine the size and layout of future lots outside of the Hamlet designated area. 7)
The hydrogeological work and additional confirrnatory studies undertaken in preparation and support of the hydrogeological report(s) for the subject property did not use information or field data related to well hydrofracturing. Hydrofracturing is not proposed as part of the proposed subdivision development.
J
491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON K7P 1J9
(s’ia) 634 - ssgs
Page 101 of 231
Page 6
File: ASC-095 1 1 61 T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON
October 29, 2015
We concur with Malroz and Mclntosh Perry that based on the site sensitivity and
water quality a higher Ievel of investigation was required to fully assess the proposed subdivision. We have advanced additional wells, conducted additional field work and
developed an analytic model to assess the impact of the proposed subdivision on the water quantity demonstrating a higher level of investigation clearly exceeding the minimum requirements of MOECC D-s-s.
Further, we have committed to having each additional well installed at the site evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist who is Iicensed by the Ontario Association of Professional Geoscientists or Professional Engineers of Ontario. We concur with Malroz that the additional work undertaken to date has exceeded the
minimum requirements in the MOECC D-s-s Procedure clearly demonstrating long term water supply of the proposed 13 Lot subdivision development in the north portion of the properly.
2.O Closure
ASC Environmental (ASC) was retained by Terry Grant Constmction to prepare comments in prepara!ion for residential development at the subject property located in the Hamlet of Hartington, Geographic Township of Portland, Ontario. Hydrogeological work conducted to date including advancing additional wells, conducting additional field work and developing an analytical model has demonstrated long term water supply sufficient to support 47 lots on the full 45 hectare property. Clearly the property has been sufficiently characterized to support the impact on the long term water supply from the proposed 13 Lot development in the north portion of the property.
The findings reported in this document are based on the tasks completed by ASC under the -mutu’ally agreed scope of work. Professional judgement, experience with similar investigations,- and available data collected within the scope of work form the basis for our comments. ASC has prepared this document using information understood to be factual and correct, and shall not be responsible for conditions
arising from information or facts that were inaccurate, concealed, or not fully disclosed at the time of our work.
491 0’ConnorDrive, Kingston, ON
[
K7P ‘i.ig
(szs) 634 - ssgs
Page 102 of 231 Page 7
File: ASC-096 1161
T. Grant Custom Homes
Response to Technical Comments
Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hartington, ON
October 29, 2015
We thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project, and trust that this information meets your satisfaaion. If you have questions or concerns regarding this document please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, ASC
rmental Inc.
(:,-u Paul N. Johnstog/M.Sc., P. Eng. Project Managi
m
l l 1%-Y 'I'5? SCAIE - I:2.000 E) s s Q % % 0 !FUREFRDNT 2f O W 6 -l) % ?ffK- $ % ? pouo .i61 Engineering Inc. 228.60 ':?a ta) IN sgcrrou si.iv(ii-r.) or r+rg'pr.aurtrrtc ACT l: )a) n #N## ? e? ?I? 81sa* l)a h? Mx -::.-Sl',i To 0 Ih?? 'jks++" h'll-all Ms* 0 alb 8}? es llaaQ I%s 81? lm i? lal? Q? l%lssh Ihha lmaaaia (1000} ? mx m+?d S? l#% f Z ial 111 I? Ils*a . + . i Flbh l)0 Imll?b rh# A% I-J#01 + :i4i-14-osQq[. ';l; jvy'-I%?' Im SI? l)u lls IT?I l :!;Jl '<- H ttllw.wll llll&.jjl.llll ADDIT[ONAI. MF.ORM.AT[ON REQUIRED UNDER d li?? i.46 i.86 totx%X !-*M]0% M :yna*-+=sxwbbiiv.'b'wnx?-s.r k (l il- l*' j 81? am lk? Rx i? l -I.a4w I%llaallaai l%rni. ? Ryba a? Mxhln?. Ia0 bs 81? Ils I? Rss ) ..iL,, j.l OWNERaS CERTrF[CATE I. Ts-s Ihsa Ht*lm Islhwb? n@?PRO??I Ia 1%@aaa asd 8sbMll fMa Plas g glCMKlll TERRY CRANT - 1210001 0nhv% ha. DATa: wmMN& 2011 ,t/gs' 1278804 Ihlatla In!. l HAvv THE AIITHDR?TY TO alND THE conluTION a W SURVEYORaS CERT[F[CATE? I CmRTlrl riur? I. lm muWniN?g O? ffif umm 16 m mllgbl[lD8 mn rm mr.imysyip m rux aruhcgwr uNm ma t6hhRem 8rhl*N. +-:>;y-.3,J e 8Mll'll & gMfTH SURVEnRS Ilml mmMaEk 0018 WlllJ[M N. elRh-Il.Lm. l===?W==l TWO3 (Th LOT4 ,159-0 l .. SSITE [ KEY PLAN Cl -cn l la)l xh 'rwoiol a'l kOT 0 ! ? l- l LOTTh -?k+ (-1 ?l r? '-isa.r E kOT l t58.O' -l zi TW(14 0 =6i ail ,tl 1 (, 158' ] /-15aO ,157, '?oos e on tl'l' rl zi I -O IN 'n 'la) l)i +i Z 57,1 157.1 157.1 TWO8 zl 10i @ o /ia' WMSOE FAltrl'Y [MrACffmlW l SIIM FAcltlff l IYlrAt alrrl AREA LOTS .k BIOCKS d{173 I ki 13 mTWET8. BLllCl! 11 gtncit is lo ) ITHER-LXg)S OWNED BY APPLICANT AREA * DENmTY l 10.53 Aa l '-l.JJ u.u,ri. l l W roJ?' l l LAND USE .l58.Q ?/ I SITE DATA m llr.BB*w RKM *iF'tMRER 18. I!016 'N Page 106 of 231 Page 107 of 231 Enclosure 1 File: ASC-095 1181 December 3, 2015 Proposed Hartington Subdivision, Hartington, ON Test Wells - The following nitrate concentrations were identified in groundwater samples from test wells: Lot#l3 Lot#l0 Lot # 4 Lot # 9 Lot # s South of Lot #7 Test well TWO1 0.75 mg/l Test well TWO2 0.1 mg/l Test well TWO3 2.1 mg/l and 3.1 mg/l (2.6 mg/I average) Test well TWO9 2.8 mg/l Testwell TW10 4.21 mg/l Test well TWO4 0.3 mg/I Nitrate Concentration at 13 Lot Boundary The infiltrating precipitation volume was calculated using a water surplus value determined from Figure 6.3.1 in Regional Flood Frequency Analysis (Moin and Shaw, 1986) and an infiltration factor determined from Table 2: Infiltrating Factors in MOEE Hydrogeological Technical Information Requirements For Land Development Applications (MOEE, 1995). The permeable area, Ad, was determined considering roadway, sidewalk and driveway areas. Each dwelling roof will utilize eavestroughs and downspouts to discharge precipitation to the permeable ground surface. The permeable area of the site is 11 .15 hectares of the total 11 .85 hectares. We present the following calculation to assess Nitrate: Water surplus = 387.5 mm (average between 375 and 400 mm from Figure 6.3. 1 ) Infiltration factor (from Table 2): Topography (rolling land) Soil (medium combination of clay and loam) Cover (cultivated lands) 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.5 k = water surplus x infiltration factor k = 387.5 mm x O.5 k = 193.75 mm m Page 108 of 231 File: ASC-095 1181 Proposed Hartington Subdivision, Hartington, ON Enclosure 1 December 3, 2015 Nitrate For 13 Lot Subdivision - (11.85 hectares): 1 . k (annual dilution precipitation rate) = 0.19375 m 2. Permeable area 13 Lot Subdivision = 11 .15 Ha 3. Va (annual dilution volume) = Ad x k = 11.15 Ha x O.19375 m = 21,603,000 L 4. Vs (annual sewage volume) = 13 Lots x 1000 l/d x 365 day/yr = 4,745,000 L s. Vt (total annual volume) = Va + Vs = 26,348,000 L 6. Cs (concentration of nitrate in sewage) = 40 mg/L 7. a. Cb (background nitrate concentration) = 1 .79 mg/L 8. a. Cpb (concentration of nitrate at boun6ary) = ((Cs x Vs)/Vt ) + Cb = 9.0 mg/L Nitrate For 13 Lot Subdivision - (using full 45 hectares for dilution): 1 . k (annual dilution precipitation rate) = 0.19375 m 2. Permeable area 13 Lot Subdivision = 44.15 Ha (including impermeable area from 13 Lots) 3. Va (annual dilution volume) = Ad x k = 44.15 Ha x O.19375 m = 85,540,625 L 4. Vs (annual sewage volume) = l3Lots x 1000 l/d x 365 day/yr = 4,745,000 L s. Vt (total annual volume) = Va + Vs = 90,285,625 L 6. Cs (concentration of nitrate in sewage) = 40 mg/L 7. b. Cb (background nitrate concentration) = 1 .79 mg/L 8. b. Cpb (concentration of nitrate at boundary) = ((Cs x Vs)/Vt ) + Cb = 3.9 mg/L !?!ENVIRONMENTAL Page 109 of 231 One Resocirce, Multiple Results info@soservtces.ca JANUARY18,2016 TO!VNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC P.0. Box 100 Synsy,sxt, ONTARIO KOH 2TO RE: SOIL AND GROUND WATER ASSESSMENT LETTER - 5598 KING'S HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON The purpose of this letter is to provide comment on the iikelihood of migration of hydrocarbon coritamiiiation in groundwater from the above noted site. Specialized Onsite Services Inc. [SOS] carried out a partial soil and groundwater remediation program at a property located at 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario [the "Site"?. As part of the investigation conducted at the subject Site, a limited subsutface drilling program was performed on the properq. The subject property is a commercial property owned by the Tomship of South Frontenac. The propeior is currently a vacant lot but formerly had one. txvo storey building constructed on it with several additions attached. The building formerly operated as a convenience store and gas bar. Two gasoline pumps were formerly located to the west of the buildirig fronting Highway 38, Fuel for the pumps was provided by two underground fuel storage tanks [UFST] formerly buried to the south of the building footprint. Tlie site is bounded by a commercial property to the south, So?ith Frontenac Townsliip Fire Hall to the east. King's Highway 38 to the svest and HoJleford Road to the north. Based on-site investigations pe.rformed to date and analytical testing of soils and ground water collected during the assessment process conducted at the Site, petroleum hydrocarbon contamination ivas found within the subsurface soils and ground water at 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario. The contamination was found to extend out laterally from the former underground fuel storage tanks to the north, south, east and west. Hydrocarbon contamination was identified in the ftactured bedrock layers at 3.O metres below ground surface and extended to th.e competent bedrock layer at approximately 3.65 m depth respectively. Verification soil samples collected from the excavation extents identified elevated levels of petroleum hydrocarbon [PHC] along with benzene, toluene, ethybenzene and xylenes [BTEX] contamination that exceeded the applicable Table 6 Site Condition Standard provided in the MOE document "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmenta[ Protectton Act". From the seven ground water samples collected trom the monitoring well network on the subject property, two (2) had elevated PHC and BTEX detections that exceeded the a?pplicable Table 6 SCS. Petroleum l'iydrocarbon contamination remains in subsurface soi}s and fractured bedrock layers around the north, east and west extents of the former excavated area. In addition, hydrocarbon impacts were identified in the subsurface soil/rock on the north elevatioty of the property adjacent Holleford Road. SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES lsc. 357 BEECHWOOD ROAD, NAPANEE, ON, K7R 3LI TEL: 61 3-354-3553 EMAIL: .?.?.ibir:o@?s.???????v?c=sct:x WWW.SOSERVICES.CA Page 110 of 231 JANUARY 10, 20le SOS FILE #1501-140 3('>IL AND GROUNDWATER ASJ;ESSMENT IETTER 5598 HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON. ON Ground water samples collected from the rrionitoring vveJl neAsvork on-site identified PHC and BTEX contamination at otie (l) Iocation which ex.ceededt the appnicable MOE Tabie 6 Site Conditiort Standards. Based on verification water samples collected. it is recorrmended that additiotiaJ samples be collected from the monitoring welu network in order to monitor the contamination identified within shallow groundwater table. Based on monitoring welN observations, local groundwater flow appears to be towiards the east. The relatnve elevations of the groundwater table found in the site rtxonitoring wells show that at the time of monitoring, the horizontaN groundwater gradient was re!atively flat, indicating that groundivater flow velocity at the site is relative(y low. Based on the ioxi groundwater flow velociff, it is expected that the risk of migration of gyoundwatev contamination to sites in excess of 500 m away from the subject site, is also re[ativeiy low. SOS recommends that additional monitoring weils be drilled to establish ciean perimeter wells arou?nd the entire site. The perimeter wells should be monitored twice per ye,;m to monitor whetber or nof off-site contairiinant migration is occurring, untiJ the site is fully remediated. Respectfully submitted by, Spsc?zr=v O.zir'irr= SER v'rcbs, // ? (, / ,/ .r;d..(???e= Catrt Monk De.rck Maat, MASc., P. Eng., QP President Envirotxmental Engineer SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVjCES jNC. Page 111 of 231 r r %pecialized Onsite Services Inc. One Resource, Multipte Results 1 i Q info@soservices.ca JA?,=?gy 28, 2016 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC p.o. Box 100 SYDENHAM, ONTARIO KOH 2TO RE: SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION - 5598 KING'S HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON The purpose of this letter is to provide an update to our January 18, 2016 letter regarding the risk of migration of hydrocarbon contamination in groundwater from the above noted site. Subsequent to the release of our January 18, 20 16 letter, the Township provided us with a sampling report prepared by Cambium Inc. (Cambium) dated January 4, 2016, that reports groundwater monitoring well sampling results for site sampling that took place on November 25, 2015. The information provided by Cambium showed a slight increase in hydrocarbon contamination in the groundwater since the SOS sampling that occurred in July 2015. According to the Cambium November 2015 sampling data, four (4) of the seven (7) monitoring wells on the site contained petroleum hydrocarbon contamination that exceeds the applicable Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) standards. In addition to sampling monitoring wells at the subject site, Cambium also sampled groundwater from the supply wells on properties surrounding the subject site on November 25, 2015. The Cambium data showed that none of the groundwater samples from the supply wells on properties surrounding subject property contained any detections of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. The groundwater elevation data collected by Cambium during the November 25, 2015 sampling event was generally consistent with the groundwater elevation data obtained by SOS in July 2015 and confirmed that local groundwater flow direction was generally towards the east. It is noted that the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has likely been preserit on the subject site for in excess of 30 years, yet no hydrocarbon impact has been observed in supply wells at adjacent properties. In addition, the remediation work that was carried out at the site in 2015, which involved the excavation and removal of in excess of 250 tormes of contaminated soil and rock, has significantly reduced the potential for migration of hydrocarbon contamination, compared to the condition of the site prior to 2015. It is our opinion that based on the fact that local groundwater flow appears to be towards the east and that no hydrocarbon impact has been observed in water supply wells on properties located adjacent to the subject site, the potential is very low that hydrocarbon impact from the site will migrate to proposed supply wells located several hundred meters to the west of the site. SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES INC. 357 BEECHWOOD ROAD, NAPANEE, ON, K7R 3LI TEL: 613-354-3553 EMAIL: iiypo(oi,sosesvicgs.ch WWVll.SOSERVlCES.CA Page 112 of 231 JANUARY 18, 2016 SOIL AND GROUNDWA TER CONTAMINA TION SOS FILE #1501-140 5598 HIGHWAY 38, HARTINGTON, ON Respectfully submitted by, S PECL4LIZED Orqs'rw S r=vvrcps, ,7 /') .-? / 1) Cam Monk President Derek Maat, MASc., P. Eng., QP Environmental Engineer SPECIALIZED ONSITE SERVICES INC. Please see Malroz Engineering's response to the SOS correspondence. Page 113 of 231 Joe Joe Gallivan MCIP RPP Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie ON KOH IS0 phone 613.548.9400 extension 350 fax 613.548.8460 email jgallivan@frontenaccounty,ca From: John Pyke [mailto:Pyke@malroz.com? Subject: Hartington Gas Bar Comments Hi joe, We understand that comments have been provided regarding the proposed Grant subdivision in Hartington and the potential impact of the former gas bar at the corner of Highway 38 and Holleford Road. We have reviewed the following documents: 1. Soil and Ground Water Assessment Report - 5'A8 King's Highway 38, Hartington, ON, prepared by Specialized Onsite Services Inc., dated September 28, 2015. On- and Off-Site Groundwater Sampling, 5598 County Road 38, Hartington, Onbario, Cambium Reference No. 4560-001, prepared by Cambium Inc., dated January 4, 2016. Soil and Ground Water Contamination - 5598 King's Highway 38, Hartington, ON., prepared by Specialized 2. 3. Onsite Services Inc., dated January 28, 2016. The above information is in addition to the reports on file from the subdivision proponents consultant. Report number 1 speaks to the site assessment work conducted at the referenced site. The report identified petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in both the soil and shallow groundwater. A water sample collected from the onsite potable water supply well met the standards. Monitoring wells installed as a part of the assessment vvere surveyed for relative elevation and groundwater Ievels measured at each of the 7 monitoring wells. The relative elevation of the water levels in the monitoring wells indicated that groundwafer flow was northeast, east and southeast across the site. Report number 2 speaks to groundwater sampling at the 7 monitoring wells at the site, one onsite potable water supply well and 6 offsite potable water supply wells. The sampling indicated that the shallow groundwater petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not delineated. The results further indicated that the deeper potable water supply wells met the standards. Report number 3 speaks to the consultants opinion that contamination of proposed supply wells Iocated several hundred meters west of the site are unlikely to be impacted from the subject site contamination. Malroz Comments Groundwater level monitoring at the proposed subdivision indicates that groundwater flow in the potable water supply aquifer is predominately southerly with some east, north and westerly components in the north part of the site. Groundwater Ievel monitoring in the shallower wells at the gas bar site conducted by 505 indicate that shallow groundwater flow is easterly (away from the proposed subdivision). Groundwater analyses conducted by 505 and Cambium identify petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the shallow g,roundwater with the deeper water supply wells as being below laboratory detection Iimits for petroleum hydrocarbons. It appears that the petroleum hydrocarbon plume at the site has not been fully delineated and should be managed in accordance with TSSA and MOECC regulations. Considering the information from ASC Environmental, 505 and Cambium we are of the opinion that the risk to the proposed subdivision from the former gas bar at highway 38 and Holleford Road to be Iow. This cursory review has been conducted to assess the potential risk of petroleum hydrocarbon migration from the former gas bar at highway 38 and Holleford Road in Hartington, Ontario may migrate to the proposed Grant Subdivision on Boyce Road and contaminate the potable bedrock water supply aquifer. Our assessment of the risk is based on reports prepared by others and Malroz has not conducted field assessments to verify the information contained in those reports. Should a more detailed assessment be undertaken or further information become available we would recommend that the above opinion be revisited. This opinion has been prepared for the sole use of the County of rrontenac. Please Iet us know if you have any further questions. Best Regards, John R. Pyke, P.Geo. Environmental Geoscientist Malroz Engineering Inc. tel (613) 548-3446 ex.34 fax (613) 548-7975 pyke@malroz.com Page 114 of 231 PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Planning Department Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Date of Report: February 15, 2016 Subject: Closing of Road Allowance in, Part of Lot 26, Between Concessions V and VI, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Corrigan ________________________________________________________________ Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council deny a request from a property-owner to close and transfer ownership of a portion of unopened road allowance at Bobs Lake in the District of Bedford. Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide the background information necessary to enable Council to decide on the closing of an untravelled and unopened Township road allowance. Background & Discussion: The Planning Department received a letter from a lawyer representing the owner of the above-noted property requesting to know whether Council would agree to the closure and sale of a portion of unopened road allowance that runs through the west portion of his client’s property and leads to the shore of Bobs Lake. The letter dated September 29, 2015, describes that the property is currently in the Registry system and was not converted to Land Titles because it includes the land on the road allowance which was never stopped up and conveyed to his client. Thus, the letter is requesting that the land be stopped up and deeded to his client. Attachment #1 is a copy of the letter and Attachment #2 is a map showing the location of the subject land. Attachment #3 is a copy of a survey showing the road allowance through the property with the portion to be deeded identified as PART 1 (highlighted in yellow). The road allowance is a northern extension of Burns Road that leads directly to the waterfront of Bobs Lake. As seen on the survey, the portion to be deeded is a triangular portion of land that effectively severs the main portion of the road allowance in the south from the waterfront portion at the north. It is approximately 140 metres (460 ft.) long and is 0.48 acres in size. The land is treed and slopes steeply towards the shoreline. Discussion: It should be emphasized that it has been Council’s policy to not close road allowances that lead to any waterfront. It has been Council’s preference to maintain these portions of road allowance for the public’s access to the water. This matter came before the Committee of the Whole on November 10, 2015 where the Committee decided that Council members should visit the site to determine whether the lay of the land would make it possible for future public Page 115 of 231 access to the water. The Planning Department was advised by both Bedford representatives that the area is in fact suitable for public access. Conclusion: Because the road allowance appears capable of accommodating future public access to the shore of the lake the request to close and sell the land should be denied. Recommendation It is recommended that Council deny the request to close and transfer ownership of the unopened road allowance in Part of Lot 26, between Concessions V and VI in the District of Bedford. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments RoadClosureReportCorrigan Prepared by: Lindsay Mills, Page 116 of 231 ATTACHMENT #1 BRYNA D. MCLEOD LAWYER VIA r:,=xx 613-376-6657 September 29, 20?5 Township of South Frontenac }).0. Box 1.00 4432 Georgc Street Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2T0 Attn: Wayne Orr - Chief Administrative Officer Dear Mr Orr: Re: CORRIGAN, Katlileen PIN 36239-0098, Pts l arid 2, 13R-20872 Roll No.: 23 08 030 023 00343 My File No.: 11 I81 I am the solicitor for Kathleen Corrigan, the registered owner of the above-noted property. T?ie property is currently in the Registry system, and is a non-convert to I,and Titles because it includes lands on the road allowance between Concessioiis s and 6, former Township of' Bedford, which road allowance was riot stopped off by by-)aw or conveyed to my client or her predecessors in title. The part of the property on the road allowance is Part 1, 13R-20872. l have enclosed detaii otthe reference plan showing the lands in question. l-he purpose of this letter is to enquire whether the arownship of South Froiitenac would be prepared to deed Part 1, 1 3R-20872 to my client. My client, and before her her predecessor-ixi-title (her aunt Ann German), have been iii occupation of the property since April, 1964. l nave enclosed a copy of the transfer rron?i my client's gra.rzdmother to my client's aunt, registered Apri} 17, 1964, which ixicludes a sketch of the lands. Thank-you for your consideration of this matter. Please let me know what further information you might require. Bryria D. McLeod F'roless!onal CorporaVon s Norwich Street West Guelph, Ontario NIH 2G8 Tel 519.767.2141 Fax S19.767.2145 brynamcleod.com tm' Yours very tru?y, f,,/V',,AJ Bryna McLeod BM:mhs oroiroolJ 9C)TJJO Mt"I PO9TC))J etlKlE[ ciT]l2. L9L 6Tg XVa lTr:';l I'Hd CiTO2./2:0/OT Page 117 of 231 7"? TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC p(A' W??',4. ATTACHMENT #2 n '? N y Bobs Lake W- E l s r / v / ,," /-; l % l} / (V! y } ') V 7 ) I !9 S Bobs Lake !W !1 l l S ' l 1 ! ! 'N & 4> l Th l r t I l l r l ?'a /'-, ,') wE1E f> ! r, M'o d . Burridge Lake fc, 0%l Xe l =34! a ???-,,"?%l .4 'S L 66-,%, i b '? < f l- l /0 l ! ? h( Page 118 of 231 ATTACHMENT #3 PLAN of of SURVEY of Pa,rt of LOT 26, CONCESSION 6 Part of the ROAD ALL(flANCE betweer CONCESSIONS s AND 6 (;eogmpMc Towns7at%p of Bedford TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNTY of COUNTY 50metres o 50 l J l SCALE = 1:1500 18 l 18 l 100 I i 150metres J l j l HOPKINS, CORMIER & CH)Tff SURTnEY(NC CONSULTmTS INC. -2012- l Q S I-i Bob's Lake (:l 0 ?l p*nr 0 %,j (Controlled - :See Note) o k a to + (.4 7, 0' Ul ? Th PLAN 13R-3323 (! [ € l C?l 0 '< C') OTO/EOO9 ail=i SSIB (i352) * N ';i'O sb 4: a? s ffl -,J b rz ./?SSl8 [71 01 l (JJ liN - p!4?? :,,' ,,; '4? N G))TJJO Mt"I PO9'IOW et)K1E[ ciT]TZ L9L 6T(; XV,H Zf:gT I'Ha CiTOZ/ZO/OT Page 119 of 231 A I * 2 1 '%: r J J @WJ 1 } al j<'i' L J P rj # 1 '1 r l !0L !" i. 1Qj 9 Wl Th.%,i.'? r V l fi 1 r,/ r 'IR')'€(99514 / / l Q 362389507S l !/ '! ( S '% l Th 1 XS k '( W l t l rk '%l S 4? * / M F ,T 4 F'l K '!! 113 mi W 1 1 i j % Gall P r L ilx r a r L.- 362399515i l/ & Page 120 of 231 PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: March 1, 2016 Planning Department County File: 10T-2013/001 Report Date: February 25, 2016 Applicant: 1059823 Ont. Ltd. Matias Subject: Approval of Subdivision Agreement in Part of Lots 18 & 19, Concession II, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Willowbrook Estates ________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council pass By-law Number 2016-14 authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a subdivision agreement with 1059823 Ontario Ltd. (Tony Matias) for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates residential subdivision. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a subdivision agreement and a by-law to enter into the agreement to allow development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision. BACKGROUND On November 17, 2015 Council approved draft plan conditions for Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Plan of Subdivision. Subsequently, on January 20, 2016, Frontenac County also gave their approval to the draft plan conditions. As Council will recall, the full development of the subdivision is proposed to be in two phases. Phase 1 would comprise seven lots and Phase 2 would have nine lots. Attachment #1 shows the subject parcel and Attachment #2 shows the full development with both phases identified. Attachment#3 is a surveyor’s depiction of the Phase 1 layout. Council should note that Phase 1 of the subdivision is proposed to be developed at this time and the attached agreement is specific to this phase only. When Phase 2 comes forward for development another subdivision agreement must be entered into for that phase. CONCLUSION The attached subdivision agreement has been prepared in accordance with the draft conditions approved by Township Council and County Council. They have been prepared by the Township’s solicitor and have been reviewed by Township staff and the developer and his solicitor. The CAO advises Council that the Township does not have the processes or staffing capacity in place to effectively manage the agreement as written and while the CAO is not in a position to state what is definitely needed at this time, nothing is to be gained by delaying approval. During the implementation of the agreement staff will provide best efforts to work with the developer through the process. It is staff’s opinion that the provisions of the agreement fully implement the conditions of draft approval and they are therefore supported. PROCESS Following approval of the subdivision agreement, Planning will advise the County that all conditions for draft approval have been met. Following this, the County Page 121 of 231 would give final approval to the subdivision application. The subdivision agreement itself must be registered on the title of the land after which time the new lots are created and construction of the homes can proceed. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that By-law Number 201614 to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute a subdivision agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 Ontario Ltd. for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision, be passed. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments MatiasSubdivionAreemmentBylawReport Prepared by: Lindsay Mills Page 122 of 231 Wl!LoWBRoOK EsTAmS .-'-A ATTACHMENT #2 li '?A' ! 'sl'fj'%?-')'Sl&?I"a??:'/"(?"'j A!I-" '$129Page of 95123 of 231 I il iA 'i/ Jl 10 /! all i!'j ,a NQ ).1, h(,) '.1 11 lllffialw' '); J s '+? (.Y" i m l ,%l l 'l 'S i-'HA 'r 'ffi- W - - Nl 11 "l .-,-' i 1 g' BLOCk 8 'ii 1, 11, l K?l&m l (Tt(l JI?N( e.? aY . t(YX.OaleAl %i '%'l ffii',,i /, S L d l ,?-J.€>"P '! ,,3 ,%',"? l ( 6J 11' -n us -, .Qs:Ja%a%ffg a/, ?l l 2 a 2' s o '4ttl {'-IS as v,, i5* 'i LSI ulAT 7' 8 I I / Ij r,? ! .1 LOT KTLANI} mARY assasutm mposy i '%I BY ECOIJ'aAl SERWaES lDA'fi JUNt & 2(Xa ,! J 'r 11)R 1> o l,, ?4 i"S / (1.5?)! Il.3€% ( l :',:<,- aJ, X %' (1/r o F 'a? ! .y'cil tOT 9 !b i 30m 'it'ThlAe)l IjltXAH5 alXlh :%.I2)l ( NtW LUJIT g atVATlm- I0ff.(x+ I 'i" O LOT 7, k '4 b r Cl {l l(l 1 a 1=, to l art 8 g A i fl ,- e .tu a. '----l t 0 J:? ( 11 I -??€ l 5A.S&% 'l] ti WETIAND R(XMIARN DEljN€Aa 'A'l m lvtml Mr LOT 3 l l (!OM?Ai 6'PA S 's S ll 'I '1 V 'i l lCXlSTNa ,4AIN FIJX 'm BE fluKD 61).(10 'aukMlM 16 11 ..;' l' s ei, V 1 9 % 1 l # ?x ks,- ,, j,,11 1 'l ,5m' LOT A 'l' '1 3 I, 1' la l/ / 11 g -'b'.- j lffl(kl i %., ! s! l' l to d U.a' 1 s/ -, I s'lX ,Slo, ,o>D PS {i i /J S U-ay / ") l Inc. liii--l / i i Page 124 of 231 Page 30 of 95 ATTACHMENT #3 1!!;Ometres l 1, IB (taae;ll)' .,,.LNoTt7hgrl1%MAvtgk of > o CONCESS IO N & ?% k Kl, PART 7, PLAN L (N84'22'!E 18 (1888) IQ Ig C=32.44- A-87.31 R=20.O0 m o), # 7 9 '> / Z.IB ,(7pl€a ??%l*Jh' (Jl > I 73R- PIN 38292-0000 "/ % k %J (bB els 1l Mt,@q as 'S:I +G 7 eo%J ssa (taaa) (WIT) m h'< 0 <. 'e 's S o b4 Ag xI 0,? ,,=?$'!,!,,7'; '.-=='* .-'. % ?:?, gi.b Q,is x/4a '1= S Q;it*4u QJ / hi50 $ 0 '!'- 0 /- W va?l V s O # (3 ?) SSIB (1888)