Published April 5, 2016
Word Count 40383 words
Reading Time 190 min read

Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: April 5, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2016/Council Meeting - 05 Apr 2016 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Page 1 of 154

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Tuesday, April 5, 2016 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

a)

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Public Meeting

a)

Open Public Meeting

b)

Proposed Sale of Municipal Property, Part Lot 14, Concession IX, Bedford District

4 - 13

c)

Collins Lake Subdivision

14 - 68

Approval of Minutes

a)

Minutes of March 8, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting

69 - 72

b)

Minutes of the March 15, 2016 Council meeting

73 - 81

c)

Minutes of the March 22, 2016 Committee of the Whole Meeting

82 - 84

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Conveyance of Closed Road Allowance between Lots 24 and 25, Concession VIII, Storrington District

85

b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Recreation Committee Secretaries Payments

86 - 87

c)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Joint Appointment to Cataraqui Source Protection Committee

88

d)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion Supporting Local Businesses

89

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing

90 104

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Amendment to Subdivision in Part of Lots 18 and 19, Concession II, Willowbrook Estates (See By-law 2016-24)

105 108

Page 2 of 154

c)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law: Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11

Committee Meeting Minutes

a)

Police Services Board - Annual Meeting held November 19, 2015

110 111

b)

Police Services Board - Regular Meeting held November 19, 2015

112 113

c)

Corporate Services Committee Meeting held January 15, 2016

114

d)

South Frontenac Recreation Committee Meeting of January 18, 2016

115 116

e)

South Frontenac Recreation Committee Meeting of February 29, 2016

117 119

f)

Public Services Committee Meeting held February 18, 2016

120 121

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-24 - Change Schedule B of Matias Subdivision Agreement

122 123

b)

By-law 2016-25 - Sale of Surplus Lands - Concession IX, Part Lot 14

124 125

Reports for Information

a)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender PW-2016-08 Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning Program.

126 130

b)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender No. PW-201610 Micro Surfacing Program

131

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Tender No. PW-201615 - Crack Sealing Program.

132

d)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Harrowsmith Intersection on Road 38

133 134

e)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Contract 2016-11 South Frontenac, North Frontenac and Frontenac Island - Pavement Marking Program

135

Information Items

a)

Reta Azulay, Dealer/Owner, Northway Home Hardware, re: Support for LCBO/Beer Store

136

b)

Delan Jinapriya, re: Proposed Zoning By-law changes

137

109

Page 3 of 154

c)

Daniel Floyd, re: Changes to Proposed Zoning By-law

138

d)

Meela Melnik-Proud and Matt Rennie, re: March 2016 Settlement Agreements on Johnston Point

139 141

e)

Mary Masse, Clerk, Town of Lakeshore, re: Request for resolution endorsement - OMB Simplified Process

142 144

f)

Mayor Vandewal’s letter to Premier Wynne, re: Large Solar Projects

145

g)

Michael Chan, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade, re: Lincoln M. Alexander Award Nominations

146 147

h)

John Williamson, re: Collins Lake Subdivision

148 150

i)

Linda Phibbs, 3178 Lakefield Dr, re: Collins Lake Subdivision

151

j)

Alex Simmons, re: Collins Lake Subdivision

152 153

Notice of Motions

Announcements

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-26

Adjournment

a)

Resolution

154

Page 4 of 154

PLANNING REPORT: PUBLIC MEETING Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: April 5, 2016 Date of Report: March 31, 2016

Planning Department

Subject: Possible Sale of Municipal Property, Part Lot 14, Concession IX, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac: Amey Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that the Council passes a by-law to declare as surplus and sell 100 acres of Township owned land. Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring back to Council a request from a Township resident to purchase Township-owned land and to hold a public meeting on the proposed sale as required under the Municipal Act. Background As Council is now aware, Doug Amey, a Township resident, has brought forward a request to purchase a vacant 100 acre property owned by the Township. The property abuts land that is already owned by Mr. Amey that is also 100 acres in size. Attachment #1 shows the location of the Township-owned land and the abutting land owned by Mr. Amey. Attachment #2 is a letter from Mr. Amey’s lawyer requesting Council’s consideration of the sale. Council and staff have been dealing with this matter for more than a year – the issue being that Mr. Amey’s land is essentially land-locked and is accessible only through an unopened road allowance from Canoe Lake Road – a distance of approximately 1.2 kilometres. The abutting Township-owned land is also land locked and is accessible only by way of this road allowance. Attachment #3 shows Mr. Amey’s land, the Township land and the unopened road allowance. The attachment shows two problems with the present use of the unopened road allowances to access Mr. Amey’s land as follows:

  1. The road allowance is aligned through a wetland and a waterbody making access physically very difficult.
  2. A number of farm buildings and uses associated with the abutting land appear to be located on the road allowance near Canoe Lake Road causing difficulty for passage through the road allowance. Mr. Amey also advises that a fence located here further blocks the access. Attachment #4 shows the encroaching uses in more detail. It should be noted that the owner of the buildings that partially block the access have been made aware that they are not permitted to prevent passage of the public over the unopened road allowance. The proposed sale came before the Committee of the Whole on January 27, 2015 where the Committee appeared to be favourable to the sale of the land and directed that a public meeting be held on the sale as required. However, the Committee also required that the land be evaluated by a professional property appraiser before going forward. Accordingly, on November 25, 2015, the Planning Department was advised by Weatherby Real Estate Limited that the value of the subject land is $34,000.00. Subsequently it was discovered that a small illegal residence and out buildings existed on the Township land and the Committee, thus deferred any decision on the sale to allow by-law enforcement to investigate. It was confirmed that the buildings exist on the land.

Page 5 of 154 This matter was discussed with the applicant Doug Amey who advised that he is not concerned that someone is using the land as a residence and he is still willing to purchase the land. Thus, from staff’s perspective, the illegal development should not affect the sale. If Mr. Amey acquires the land he will become responsible for bringing the structures into compliance with the Building Code. Most recently, the matter came back to the Committee on January 12, 2016 where members agreed in principle to the sale but also required that a separate independent appraisal be conducted to confirm the selling price of $34,000.00 for the land. On March 31, 2016 staff received a second appraisal from Century 21 Limestone Realty confirming the figure of $34,000.00. A copy of the letter is attached as Attachment #5. Process To sell surplus property, there is a requirement to pass a by-law declaring the property to be surplus and to give notice to the public of the proposed sale. Attachment #6 explains the procedure for notice of sale of municipal lands. The public meeting was advertised for four weeks as required. Conclusion The Committee of the Whole has already agreed in principle to the sale of the Township land to Doug Amey and now the appraised sale price has been confirmed. Thus, all information has been received to complete the sale. By-law

2016-25 is attached to effect the sale. However, Council should hear from the

public before considering passage of the by-law. Recommendation It is recommended that Council consider the passage of By-law 2016-25 to declare 100 acres of Township land as surplus and authorize the sale of such lands described as Part of Lot 14, Concession IX, District of Bedford, to Douglas James Amey attachments Amey2015ReportToCofW4

Page 6 of 154

a:)/ Dl/ fUl’+ IJ. ;.)%

CIL.)-;Jl+g J.1-};

ATTACHMENT

GORDON Y.

Page 7 of 154

cDa5 B.Com. (Hons.), J.D. ‘TER & SOLlmOR

ASSOCIATK: JUD:

A. MILLARD, BARMSTER A SOLlCffOR

TELEp}IONm - 613-546-3274

3 RlnEj!U sTp.fft’, P.0. BOX jo%0

FAX - 613-546-N493

KTNGSTON, ONTAJO K7L 4X.8

NEW EMAn,g gmedWarmj(l@rideaustrmtNaw.es jmUbirtl@‘rkleaustrmttaw.es

ResaJ Estate: reaNstmte@yidsumtveeffw.aa

May ‘X, 20?14

Via Fax: 613-3%-6657

To?hip of South Frontenae P laning Departh’xent 4432 George Sti’eet PO Box 100

Sydenhmn, Ontario KOH 2T0

ATTENTION: M$ ANNB LEVAC -

G ASST.STANT

Dear MS Levae:

Re: Wegt [mff,Lot ,l4 ConeeBsion ’l

:trid ojJ%dford,Soutb ?yo,ntenac ‘?ownship

As you kno?, X am t’he so?licNfoc $y ‘DougJas J. Arney Jr. of ][nverary. He advises me that be had a recent discussion wtth you about $ possAbN:[ify of Jns acquirmg from the To?hip the West Ha!f of JLot {4 Q5neession 9, Disfrf.ct of pe&ford (P[N 36245-0033 ). Tbat pmeei of Nand is direetNy north of a prope@ ‘bt Mr. Amey a[rea4y owns i fbe West HaNf of Lot :t 3 Coricession 9. Nt is om understtnding t]xat in ordjr for a eon’veyanee of ffie land to take plaz, the Township must first deem the land to be ?surplus’l and tb,en the Township rrxust eomply with the rules rod regulations for selling surplus lands.

X atn writmg to you to fornnauy to a sale of tMs property to Mr, Arrrey.

1uest that you begin the process that could ult’mately !ead

X wouNd bes moa appreciati,ve fi yo0 wou}d keep me tnformed of the steps that are beinB taken Nn thNs regard, and d you wouNd advNse tn4 Nf ffiere Xs any ot?her doymation that you require in order to eomtnence this process.

l

Page 8 of 154

Page 9 of 154

Proposed Property Purchase Attachment #4

#ll,J,

‘. !i

1

j

I

W

l

a

/

il Encroaching Land Uses

s

b /

Y

1

a !i

1

1

l

(i

?

la

!

s

1

1

%

%

I

@

?

‘kfl/]‘A )’

j

/i

?

,l

l

{[

r//j ‘A

I-4

l

?

r?) s

s

9

1 Unopened Road Allowance ]

7

P’ A

t

k

‘k 1

!

l

l

L

1

L

l

0.05

0 025

o

l

1

{.

/l

0.1

i Kilometers

l

Page 10 of 154

(?FNTtJRY ‘)l LIM 4(;TnMr F PFA.LTY LTD. LQI%,/INL OPIN?ON OF VALUE

ATTACHMENT #5

Date: March 21st, 20’l6 Subject Property: PT LOT 14, CON IX To Whom It May Concern:

l have been asked to give an Opinion of Value of the property Iocated at PT LOT 14, CON IX. This is a unique parcel of land which is roughly 100 acres.and is landlocked so it is not acoessible by road access at this point. This becomes the issue in determining the proper value of the Iand at the present time. In reviewirig sales of vacant land in the County of South Frontenac a parcel of land around 100 acres will warrant

a sale price between $80,000 and $200,000. The wide range of prices is because factors like zoning, access, topography, sewage and potable water etc., can have a large impact on the value of vacant Iand. The Iargest negattve impact on the value of the land is the Iack of accessibilty and because this is a rare situation we have little or no factual information to support our opinion of value. Therefore, my personal opinion is the property is likely worth between $30,000 and $50,000 in the unaccessible state with little uses to the Iand.

We have also reviewed the appraisal by Weatherby and feel that their findings may be more educated then our opinion of value because of our lack of familiartiy we have with similar style of properties. To be fair to the Township I would suggesting putting more merit on their determination on the value of land based on their findings. Feel free to contact me anytime with questions about this evaluation.

Sincerely,

M??t’ax 7;yAr William Taylor Owner / Sales Representative

f?:

f’/Q’!

? a- ? -ir’H

:r /1.0 (P) 613.384.4441 (F) 613.384.6664 2392 Princess Street, Kingston, ON K7M 3G4

uMgsYoNg’q?ly?1@

www.LlMESTONEREALTY.com

l

Page 11 of 154

A’TTACHMENT #6 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 1999-25

A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES GOVERN?NG THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC.

WHEREAS Section 193 of the Municipal Act, R.S.0. 1990, Chapter M.45, as amended, requires Council to establish by by-law procedures, including the giving of notice to the public, governing the sale of real property owned by the municipality, and the establishing and maintaining of a public register listing and describing au real property owned or leased by the municipality. sh’-.

NOW THEREFORE THE CORPOuT{ON OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC, BY ffS COUNCn,, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. sr Uiis by-law,

l

(a) “appraisal” shall mean an evaluation of the fair market value of real property;

(h)

“Clerk” shall mean the Clerk of the municipality;

(c)

“Council” shall mean the Clerk of the municipality;

(d)

“fair market value” shall mean the amount that would be realized by the

sale of real property by a willing vendor to a wminy, purchaser.

(e) “municipality” shall mean the Corporation of the Towmmp of South Fmntenac.

(f)

“real property” shall mean land and vice versa;

(g)

“sale” shall mean the mtention or willingness to:

(i) transfer in fee simple ownership of and titk: to real property; or (ti) grmit a permanent easement or right of way over real propetty; or

(Ui) grantaleaseholdinterestffirealpropertyforatermof21yearsor longer;

from the municipality to another person, with or without consideration. 2.

Prior to the sale of any real property owned by the municipa?ity, (,ouncil shall, (a) by by-law or resolution passed at a meeting open to the public declare h real ptoperty to be surplus;

(b) obtainnotsoonerthanone(l)yearbeforethedateofsaleat?eastor? appraisal of the fair market value of the real property from such person as the Clerk considers qualified; and

(c) give notice to the public of the proposed sale in the manner p.rescribed by this by-law. 3,

Notice to the public 4f a proposed sale of real property owned by the municipality shau be’ given prior tb, the date of the sale;

(a) by publicatio0 in a newspaper that is, in the Clerk’s opinion, of

sufficiently general paid or unpaid circulation within the municipality to give the public reasonable notffie of the proposed sale; or

(b) in the case of a proposed sale according to any other procedure prescribcd by the Mpicipal Act or any other Act, in the manner prescribed.

Page 12 of 154

Despite the requmement of Clause 2(b) of this by-law, the municipauty may sell any’of the fouowing classes of real property without first obtaining an appraisal:

(a) land O.3 metres or less m width acquired m connection with an approval or

decision or decision under the Planning Actf R,S.0. 1990, Chapter P. 13, as amended;

(b)

highways, roads and mad auowances;

(c)

land formerly used for railway branch lines if sold to an owner of land abutting the former railway land;

(d)

land that does not have direct access to a highway if sokl to the owner of land abutting that land;

(e)

land repurchased by an owner in accordance with Section 42 of the Expropriations Act, R.S.0. 1990, Chapter E.42, as mnended;

(f)

Iand designated in the municipality’s Official Plan for use as sites for the establishment and carry’ng on of industries and of industrial operations and incidental uses;

(g) land sold:

(i) for the purpose of a progrmn to encourage small business pursuant to Section 112 of the Mpnicipal AB;

(ii) the sale of land to a Community Economic Development Corporation pursuant to Section 112.1 of the Municipal Act; (iii) the sale of land to a Community Development Corporation pursuant to Section l 12.2 of the Municipal Act;

(iv) thesaleoflandasagrantpursuanttoSectionll3oftheMunicipal j?

(h) easements granted to public utilities or to telephone companies; (i) land sold under the Municjpal Tax Salqs Act, R.S.0. 1990, Chapter M.60. s,

Despite the requirements of clause 2 (b) of the by-law, the municipality may sell any real property owned by it to any one of the following classes of public bodies without first obtaining an appraisal:

(a) any municipality, including a metropolitan, regional or district municipality and the County of Oxford;

(b) a local board as defined in the Municipal Mfa3u6 Acl, R.S.0. 1990, Chapter M-46;

(c) an authority under the Cgns@rv@iin Authoriiies 4qt, R.S.0. 1990, Chapter C. 27;

(d) The Crown In Right of Ontario or of Canada and their agencies. 6.

The reqiiirements of clause 2 of this by-law shall not apply to lands sold or otherwise disposed of under an ‘agreement for providing municipal capital facilities pursuant to section 210.1(2) of the Municipal Act.

Page 13 of 154

The Clerk shall establish and maintain a public register listing and describing all real property owned or leased by the municipality and which shou?d, to the extent

that it is reasonably possible, include the following information. (a) a brief legal description of the property; (b) the assessment mu number of the real property; (c) the municipal addxess of the real property, if available; (d) the date of purchase;

(e) the name of the person from whom the property was purchased;

(f) iq,inszmentgr,beroftheTransfer/Deedbywhichtitlewastransferred i0 rue munlClpaui)!, (g) the purchase price of the real property;

(h) a brief description of improvement, if any, on the real property; (j) the date of sale of the property;

(j) the name of the person to whom the property was sold; (k) the sale price of the real property;

Despite the provisions of clause 7, the Clerk is not required to list the fouowing

classes of real property m the public register:

(a) lands O.3 metres or bss in width acquired in connection with an approval or decision under the Planning Act;

(b) all highways, roads and mad auowances, whether or not opened, unopened, closed or stopped up;

9,

(c)

land formerly used for railway branch lines;

(d)

lands sold under an agreement for the providing of municipal capital facilities pursuant to section 210.1(2) of the Municipal Aqt.

Every Transfer/Deed of real property soki by the municipality shall include a Certificate of Compliance issued by the Clerk in the form prescribed by the Regulations to the Muniqipal Act.

This by-Iaw shall not apply to the sale of any land owned by the municipality for

which an agreement was entered into by the municipality prior to January 18: 1998.

This by-law shall come into force and take effect on the day it is passed.

Dateds*(’t4s?th?dayot At'4i>

, 1999.

thir,2r’dayof 4!ll- ,1999. Read a first and seeond time diis?

Read a third time and finally pamed this ,? day of /9/4 IL,-

,,1999.

THE CORPORATION OF THE

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

ti l/- %-

Mayor

],A" Clerk d ird 1.aur lW’l

Page 14 of 154 Procedure for Public Meetings Under The Planning Act Respecting Proposed Plan of Subdivision 1.

The Council of the Township of South Frontenac is conducting a Public Meeting on behalf of the County of Frontenac under the Planning Act with respect to an application for Plan of Subdivision.

I will now ask the Planner/Deputy Clerk to advise the method by which notice of the meeting was given and confirmation as to the date that notice was given.

Any persons who wish to receive a copy of the minutes of the public meeting, a copy of the report on the Plan of Subdivision or notice of Draft Approval of the Plan of Subdivision, should indicate their full name, address, postal code and contact numbers on the “Request for Information” sheet prior to leaving the meeting. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the County of Frontenac before the proposed Plan of Subdivision is approved, the person or public body: • •

is not entitled to appeal the decisions of the County of Frontenac to the Ontario Municipal Board; and may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board unless, in the opinion of the board, there are reasonable grounds to do so.”

The procedure for the public meeting will be as follows: i) ii)

The Planner/Deputy Clerk will be asked to explain the purpose of the public meeting. I will then inquire if there are any persons present who wish to make oral or written submissions on the proposed Plan of Subdivision. If so, you should announce your name and state whether you support or oppose the proposed Plan of Subdivision. Should there be any other persons wishing to make comments on or ask questions about the proposed Plan of Subdivision, they will then be given an opportunity to address Council. Please be aware that all persons wishing to address the issues should direct their comments and questions through the Mayor.

ONCE ALL OF THE SUBMISSIONS HAVE BEEN HEARD, ANNOUNCE: i)

ii)

“The public meeting is now concluded. I would remind any persons wishing to receive additional information to provide their full name, address, postal code and contact numbers on the “Request for Information” sheet prior to leaving the meeting. Township Staff will prepare a report for consideration by Township Council at a future meeting. The Township Council will then make a recommendation to County Council.”

Page 15 of 154

PLANNING REPORT: PUBLIC MEETING Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: April 5, 2016

Planning Department Files No. 10T-2015/001 and Z-16/05

Date of Report March 29, 2016 Subject: Review of Applications for Plan of Subdivision and Associated Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lots 28 to 30, Concession VII, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Collins Lake Estates (Maybach Group Inc.)

SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that Council receive for information a Planning Report dated March 29, 2016 and forward the report, including attachments and all comments from the public meeting, to the County of Frontenac as representing the Township’s comments on the proposed Collins Lake Subdivision by Maybach Group Inc. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council for a public meeting an application for a residential plan of subdivision and associated zoning by-law amendment. The report explains the purpose of the applications for Council and the public. The public meeting is required under the terms of the Planning Act. Included is a location attachment, lot layout plan, agency comments, letter from the public and a proposed amending by-law for reference. BACKGROUND An application has been submitted to the County of Frontenac for a fifty-one lot residential plan of subdivision in the Township of South Frontenac, Storrington District. An application has also been submitted to the Township for a zoning bylaw amendment to rezone the subdivision for the new residential uses. The Planning Act requires that a public meeting be held on these types of applications and the County requested that the Township hold the public meeting on the subdivision as required under the Planning Act. Accordingly, this public meeting was scheduled and advertised to the public. Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land (the total landholdings) with Collins Lake and the City of Kingston forming its south boundary. The area to be developed is located directly to the west of the Lyons Landing residential subdivision. To the north of the subject land are single detached residential homes on Holmes Road and to the south is Collins Lake and the City of Kingston boundary. To the west is the large tract of undeveloped land also owned by the Maybach Group. The fifty-one residential lots would be accessed by three new interior roads to be constructed and eventually dedicated to the Township. The roads would be accessed off of Lakefield Drive which forms the eastern boundary of the subject land. Five of the proposed lots would front directly onto Lakefield Drive. Attachment #2 shows the layout of the planned development and the table below summarizes the proposal: Land Use Residential – Estate Lots (Lots 1-51) Parkette/Open Space Block (Block 52) Road Widening (Block 53) Roads Total

Area 54.4 hectares (134 ac.) 0.46 hectares (1.1 ac.) 0.37 hectares (0.9 ac.) 4.66 hectares (11.5 ac) 60 hectares (148 ac.)

Page 16 of 154 The lots would range in size from 0.81 hectares (2 ac.) to 1.87 hectares (4.62 ac.). Lot frontages range from 55 metres to 150 metres. A zoning by-law amendment application was also submitted which would change the zoning on the subdivided property from Rural (RU) Zone to a special Residential (R) zone to accommodate the residential use of the land. It should be noted that the present application for fifty one lots constitutes only Phase 1 of the total planned development. The overall land holdings of the owner is 323 hectares (800 ac.) and Phase 2 of the development may be brought forward sometime in the future. It should be noted that this development proposal was presented to the Committee of the Whole in December, 2015 for information. The purpose of bringing the proposal forward at that time was to notify Council of the development at an early stage. COMMENTS The County of Frontenac is the approval authority for plans of subdivision and has requested that the Township provide comments on the proposal as a commenting agency. The following is a review of all information received on the proposal and the Township’s comments noted in bold type. General The land is 202 hectares in size with approximately 1,390 metres of frontage on a wetland portion of Collins Lake. Of this area, the proposed fifty one lots would cover approximately 60 hectares. The majority of the land may be characterized as being mainly flat with a very steep cliff edge which parallels the waterfront about 100 metres back from the water. The land contains a spotty covering of mature forests but a continuous forest along the waterfront area. As can be seen on Attachment #2, the area to be developed is set well back (approximately 120 metres) from the highwater mark of the lake The subject land generally appears to be well suited to accommodate residential development. Referring to Attachment #2 there are five main features of the layout that are noteworthy and comments are included: 1.

The land is designated Rural on Schedule “A” of the Township’s Official Plan, with the whole shoreline of Collins Lake designated as Provincially Significant Wetland. The Plan permits a limited amount of residential development in the Rural designations of the Township on appropriately –sized lots that can accommodate the development on private services. The preferred method of development is through plan of subdivision. In the opinion of the Planning Department the type of development and its location meets the intent of the Official Plan in this regard.

Access to the subdivision would be by way of two entrances onto the west side of Lakefield Drive. The accesses form intersections with Copper Kettle Drive and Maple Crest Court which already intersect with Lakefield Drive on the east side. Street “A’, as shown on the plan, would connect from Lakefield Drive through the development to eventually connect with a proposed future phase of the development. It is noteworthy that the road allowances are planned to be 23 metres wide which is 3 metres wider than the normal minimum requirement for municipal roads. The extra width is to accommodate wide flatbottomed ditches to handle stormwater flows. From a Planning perspective this is an efficient layout for a residential subdivision especially aligning the entrances with the existing roads to the east forming intersections. In this

Page 17 of 154 arrangement, traffic can more safely be directed from the collector roads to the local road (Lakefield Drive) at two locations minimizing traffic volumes on the local roads. Traffic would eventually flow to the arterial road (Perth Road). This layout scenario with dual access points is also efficient for emergency responders and for road maintenance crews. However, the impact of traffic from an additional fifty one lots on the intersection at Perth Road will need to be examined. 3.

As noted, the development is located at Collins Lake where a provincially significant wetland is located at the shoreline. The Official Plan calls for a minimum setback buffer of 120 metres from the PSW for any new development. As shown on the plan submitted, all development is to be located at least 120 metres back from this designation. This scenario appears to be logical in that the sensitive wetland and its buffer would remain unaffected by the development and no special setback provisions are necessary in the zoning by-law.

Five of the proposed lots (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 21) would front directly onto Lakefield Drive with their driveways accessing onto this road. This arrangement is normally acceptable but there is some concern that the access points for lots 1 and 4 are located directly at the intersection of Kahala Court and Kam Avenue. This may prove awkward in terms of safety. Also Lot 21 is located on the steepest portion of Lakefield Drive. Proper sight lines should be determined to ensure safe access here.

A small public parkette is proposed, 1.11 acres in size, located at the south end of the development. It is located at the high ridge area overlooking Collins Lake abutting the vacant natural 120 metre buffer area of the wetland further to the south. Planning supports this parkland as it would serve the development very well in terms of recreation. It may also provide an opportunity to connect with the abutting vacant natural area for further recreational trail development.

Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement of 2014 provides policy direction from the province on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS provides that efficient land use and development patterns support sustainability by promoting strong, livable, healthy and resilient communities etc. The PPS encourages efficient land use planning to create and maintain strong communities and a healthy environment while encouraging economic growth over the long-term. It recognizes that rural areas are important to the economic success and quality of life of the province. To this end, section 1.4.1 states, among other things, that we should build on the rural character and leverage rural amenities and assets. Section 1.1.5.2 of the PPS permits limited residential development on rural lands in municipalities and section 1.1.5.7 says that opportunities to support a diversified rural economy should be promoted by protecting agricultural and other resource-related uses and directing non-related development to areas where it will minimize constraint on these uses. The proposed development appears to be consistent with the direction of the Provincial Policy Statement in terms of its location and, as outlined above, the development pattern/layout is efficient and cost effective for maintenance, servicing and emergency response. It is located away from

Page 18 of 154 any prime agricultural land, aggregate areas, wetlands etc. and it would promote the Inverary settlement area located only 1.4 kilometres to the north. Official Plan As noted above, the land is designated ‘Rural’ in the Official Plan. Single detached dwellings located on lots developed through a plan of subdivision are envisaged in the Rural designation. The Plan sets out objectives for housing in the Township including the requirement that development should minimize the cost of providing essential municipal services to residents and this will be accomplished by planning controls which consider the long-term servicing costs of all developments. Also regarding servicing, the Plan requires up to standard physical and community services such as paved streets, lighted streets and to provide private water supply and private sewage treatment. In terms of preserving natural heritage (the environment) the Plan’s objective is to approach planning decisions on an ecosystem basis considering the cumulative impact of planning decisions. The goal is to ensure that no net loss of environmental quality occurs. In regards to meeting the above, the proposed development would provide needed housing options to the community that are consistent with the area’s rural character. No municipal physical services need to be expanded in that each lot would be serviced by individual private water supply and sewage systems which would be reviewed by the appropriate government agencies. Township staff will require paved streets and proper street lighting. In terms of natural heritage, the development respects the provincially significant wetland located at the shore of Collins lake and proposes that all development be a minimum of 120 metres from this feature. A ‘Planning Justification Report’ dated October, 2015, prepared by Weston Consulting, was submitted in support of the subdivision and the zoning by-law amendment applications. It further outlines the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and the Township Official Plan that support the proposed development and it describes the new zone. Relevant excerpts from the report are attached as Attachment #3. Zoning The subject land has been contemplated for subdivision development for approximately 16 years and, as a result of previous development proposals, it is presently zoned Special Residential Zone (R-7-H) in the Comprehensive Zoning By-law. The R-7 zoning permits residential development and a golf course. However, a holding symbol is included which can only be removed by by-law when appropriate water supply and septic disposal plans are submitted and approved. All proposed lots in the present subdivision meet the minimum standard for lot creation of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) contemplated in the Official Plan. However, the lot frontages vary greatly with the shortest being 55 metres and the greatest being 150 metres as opposed to a suggested minimum of 76 metres in the OP. The Weston Consultants would zone the land to a special ‘Residential’ zone to permit the residential use of the lands and to recognize the frontages as proposed at only 55 metres. It should be noted that the report wrongly zones the public parkette as Open Space whereas it should be zoned Community Facility (CF) Zone in recognition of its proposed use and the fact that it would be dedicated to and owned by the Township. Planning staff generally agree to this zoning scenario for the reason that the Comprehensive Zoning By-law reserves the Residential (R) Zoning strictly for plans of subdivision lots and the minimum lot size of 0.8 hectares (2 ac.) is specified in this zone category. The CF zoning should be included however.

Page 19 of 154 Also, it appears that only seven of the proposed lots have frontages less than 60 metres and Planning is of the opinion that a minimum of 60 metres can be achieved for all lots in the plan. Although not generally supportive of 55 metre frontages, the Planning Department can support the reduction of the normally required minimum lot frontages from 76 metres to a lesser frontage of 60 metres. This support comes from the following section of the Official Plan: (1) The Official Plan, in section 7.2 (d), specifies that the minimum lot area and lot frontages of the plan of subdivision may be reduced if it is demonstrated through the subdivision process that reductions to these minimums can be justified based on good planning principles. Accordingly, a hydrogeological study and terrain analysis was undertaken to support the plan and it determined that there is enough water to accommodate the proposed density with the proper separation between septic fields and wells. Despite this provision, it should be recognized that the development is proposed as Estate Residential Lots in a ‘rural’ setting’. As such, residential lots are expected to be relatively large consistent with maintaining the rural character. Technical Studies Various studies were prepared and submitted in support of the development proposal. These studies consist of:

Page 20 of 154 never occur if future phases do not come forward. The Township should require either a full 7.4 acre parkland dedication or a combination of parkland and cashin-lieu as a condition of approval of this development. Public Works appears to be generally supportive of the subdivision layout and finds the access areas to the subdivision to be acceptable. They are presently reviewing the stormwater management report and are dealing directly with the developers’ consultant regarding the expected increased traffic and daily trip generations. Required upgrades to the current road network are being discussed especially the access intersection at Perth Road. In terms of the proposed road network within the development – all roads must be paved with asphalt and allowances must be made for active transportation facilities for future linkages. The Fire Chief has advised that a fire hall will be required for any future phases of the development. He emphasizes that the developer should plan for this. Planning has not yet seen comments from KFL&A Public Health but in discussions with their staff they will require that a conventional septic bed be shown as well as a back-up bed location for each lot in the subdivision. A minimum six metre setback from the driveway for any septic piping would be required. By letter dated March 7, 2016 Canada Post advises that they will provide mail delivery service to the development through Community Mailboxes to be situated between Lots 16 and 17. Their letter is attached as Attachment #5. Public Comments The April 5, 2016 public meeting on the proposed development was advertised to neighbours, signs were posted on the property in public view and the proposal was advertised in the local newspaper. In response, a number of enquiries were received by the Planning Department mostly from residents in the neighbouring Lyons Landing subdivision. A letter dated March 28, 2016 from Treena Garrison (the developer of the Lyons Landing subdivision) expresses some concerns. Her concerns mostly relate to the fact that the increased usage of potable water may negatively affect the quantity of water in Lyons Landing and that the increased traffic onto Lakefield Drive will be problematic. A March 31, 2016 letter from Denise Taillon expresses concern for too many wells in the area and traffic and another March 31 letter from Mike and Tara Petrie expresses concerns regarding too much traffic on Lakefield Road have no shoulder causing danger to pedestrians. Copies of the letters are attached as Attachment #6. In relation to the above public comments, the peer reviewed results of the hydrogeological report and terrain analysis indeed appear to raise some concern over the availability of potable water. Also, Public Works is involved in discussions with the developer regarding requirements for road upgrades and to address traffic. CONCLUSION At this point in the approval process surveys and studies that support the development have been completed although the Hydrogeology report review is not supportive and some formal agency comments must still be received. The flat terrain offers few obstacles to development on the lots as proposed. The lots are of a size (0.8 ha. and larger) that building envelopes are adequate. It is emphasized that each of these envelopes must incorporate an area for two conventional septic beds, a well with separations, a single detached dwelling, accessory buildings, a driveway and a six metre setback from the driveway for any septic piping (as required by Health). It is expected that a lot grading plan should be submitted showing this information. A zoning by-law amendment is attached which recognizes the frontages proposed by the developer. The amending by-law incorporates a zoning

Page 21 of 154 map/schedule showing the new zoning for the development. This amendment is only for reference as the final zoning specifications must still be resolved. However, the requirement for the holding of a public meeting for both the subdivision and the zoning amendment can still proceed to obtain comments from the public, Council and agencies - meeting the requirements of the Planning Act. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that Council: 1. Receive the comments and attachments contained in the Planning Report dated March 29, 2016; 2. Defer any decision on the subdivision or rezoning of the property until the comments resulting from the public meeting are reviewed; 3. Forward the Planning Report dated March 29, 2016 including attachments and comments from the public meeting, to the County of Frontenac. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills Prepared by: Lindsay Mills, Attachments CollinsLakeSubdivisionPublicMeetingReport

/

4

r

l

j

[11111

?

144 I

l.j

,D

Page 22 of 154

ATTACHMENT #1?

7

/

Rl

ENF!!

j

‘?

W/

Loughborough Lake

% i"-l r l / /

P?

=$

Ci C)’

/1

0j :)

C’ C(

‘%

t’t ’l

r

LLI x Oj

?LAT![

.l".l - ,J

t

s

.Q/s[21m. ?…?I’:.? :’.1

C: z

fffl

N

t? . : ???lT’:(kNe???

r

fi

7% m

.g?

r

l

Qb

l(),

I

m. Di

t

]

H

‘?

l?

l

m

r T7 ‘?l$

pgyip?so?J?t?i I?

0

c4. !,:>!1, N

Th

n

I 1

hqlME,:

(%

y —’

p

i

/

(

)

l

‘1%

9€MwfflJ}

h

o

,OAD

l

‘y f

1

%

l

l

7 Oi 01

]

Jl

uul

/

Wl

LLI

,;

LL?I Yl <l

co

IQ < U)

;o

‘V’ ] /

<,

ul

0< >L '

N

?

il

J

/

z

< (

,’

L

[

<

1

?

I

i ?

Collins Lake

o

ISPOJ;?D ;’:i pJ ROAD E

j,? , .n

r

@ CITY OF KINGSTON

Page 23 of 154

Page 24 of 154

ATTACHMENT #3 WESTON

CONSULTING planning + urban design

Planning Justification Report 14

r’

(y

!

!!

r

11 r

.

(-?

e.l k..

-11

?:]l

,,!fJ

4{fwk< W

r,31

,-:J ‘:"‘ffi

Qal:X

r

aj.

k. k)

’li

{? :li

Vli

‘i2'2?.;’, ;:,4"!,+JN,l’,:i !

‘h% 9.:’,?hq"‘I. ?:..t"%.‘a?’n " UA

t; ? E

?lLku

‘,A:?t?. l’w., .il.t,. !.’:,?a’?.l,. ?’:. . l. ?’;.(1 : ?>: la f l.,Aa,t.l}a"’!,:

{ii

i’k r?

i l

l’!

:a’t

273

’tJ?l’Q

F! l..?

%.

%a

*)

d &PX !‘a i%l

‘?l.W: a

1,

M ‘vt-a

r

.A

t.,

r

Th

,,%

+? ;,%

V

tAl .

.‘6,’,’. “2:?<’.? 1?.’ i’f&%

li’

.11 (’

?€

[,

k

h{

C

%.*’

Maybach Group Inc. Collins Lake Estates

Township of South Frontenac October 2015

File 5909

Vaughan0fflce 20lMillwayAvenue,Suite19,Vaughan,OntarioL4K5K8 T.905.738.8080 0akville0ffice 1660NorthServiceRoadE., Suitel14,Oakville,OntarioL6H7G3T.905.844.8749 Toronto0fficel27BerkeleyStreet,Toronto,OntarioM5A2XlT.4l6.640.99l7 westonconsulting.com 1-800-363-3558 F. 905.738.6637

r-

Page 25 of 154

Hl Planning Justification Report - collins Lake Estates

7

3.I Description of Planning Application A plan of subdivision application for 51 residential lots has been submitted to the County of

l

Frontenac.

m

A Zoning By-law Amendment application has been submitted to the Township of South Frontenac to rezone the subject Iands from “Special Residential (R-7) Zone” to a Site Specific Residential (R) zone. The existing Environmental Protection (EP-2) Zone on the subject lands is proposed to remain unmodified. The Site Specific Residential (R) zone will recognize relief

l

needed in relation to the minimum required lot frontage. 6 3.2Supporting Materials l

The following supplementary reports and materials have been submitted in support of the applications:

r-’–

Environmental Impact Assessment Functional Servicing Report Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis Archeological Assessment Storrnwater Management Analysis The next section will provide an overview and summary of the reports listed above.

3.3 Environmental Impact Assessment A Phase I Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), dated October 19, 2015 was prepared by Ecological Services in support of Phase 1 of the proposed development, which will have 51 residential estate Iots ranging in size from approximately O.81 hectares (2 acres) to 1.87

i

hectares (4.62 acres).

t’-

The EIA examined the potential impacts of the proposed development on potentially significant natural heritage features. The EIA found that there are no significant valleyland and ANSI

present on the subject Iands. Further to the above, the EIA found that significant wetland and fish habitat are located over 120 metres to the south of Phase 1 of the development, separated

by an intervening woodland. Given the distance and the intervening woodland, the EIA concludes that the significant wetland and fish habitat are not considered to be at risk from Phase 1 of the development.

The EIA recommends that provisions be placed in the plan of subdivision agreement to restrict tree clearing from the back 40 metres of lots 8 to 11, in order to help maintain amphibian Iife cycle breeding. The EIA also recommends that provisions be placed in the plan of subdivision agreement to address appropriate restrictions related to tree clearing and septic/building

l

locations on lots 25 to 31 to prevent intrusion into the steep slopes located next to Collins Lake.

x

l

Page 26 of 154

ffil Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

8

Further to the above, the EIA notes that all development will be setback at least 30 metres from the watercourse Iocated along the western edge of Phase 1 . .?

l

It is finally recommended that land clearing for the purposes of the Phase 1 development should take place outside of the critical breeding season (April to July).

u

Summary

In summary, the EIA states"if the proposed reoommendations are followed, it is felt that the

Phase 1 of the Maybach Group Inc. development will be in compliance with the natural heritage policies of the PPS and the Township OP.”

3.4Functional Servicing Report

The report notes that the proposed development will be serviced by means of private septic systems and wells which will be in accordance with the recommendations of the Environmental Impact Assessment prepared by Ecological Services dated October 19, 2015 and the Hydrogeology and Terrain Analysis Report, dated October 7, 20"l5 prepared by exp Services Inc.

u

l

to review the servicing requirements for Phase “I of the proposed development, and to make recommendations for the appropriate provision of services.

l

A Functional Servicing Report, dated October 19, 2015 was prepared by Josselyn Engineering

-J

..?

Summary l

l

l

l

.j

i

In summary, the Functional Servicing Report concludes that based on the Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis there is sufficient quantity and quality of water to support the development of 5"l lots at the lands.

3.5Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis

l l

i

i

j

Based on the information above, the Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis Report, dated October 7, 2015 concludes that with the exception of the northwestern portion of the property,

l

‘4

The report states that on-site hydrogeological conditions were investigated through the construction and testing of eight (8) test wells (TW #1 , #2, #3, #7, #9, #10, #1 1 and #12). Eight six-hour pumping tests (where sufficient yield was observed) followed by recovery monitoring conducted on these wells indicate well yields at or in excess of the tested rates ranging from 19 to 20 Umin on the east and south portions of the property while well yields in the northwestern portion of the property were observed not to be sufficient.

l

..?

A Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis Report, dated October 7, 2015 was prepared by exp Services Inc. to determine the suitability of the site for the development of the proposed estate lots. Phase 1 of the development will be comprised of 51 residential estate lots which will be supported by private services.

l

Page 27 of 154

%l Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

9

the results of these tests indicated there is an adequate volume of groundwater on-site to supply these rates at the anticipated maximum demand rate of 18.75 Umin for each single family residence, for the proposed development. The Hydrogeological and Terrain Analysis Report, dated October 7, 2015 also concludes that the testing program indicates that the potential for interference on neighbouring wells is unlikely and that the long term impact on the aquifer water bearing capabilities is not expected from the proposed development.

The Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis dated October 7, 2015 makes the following recommendations in regards to Phase “l of the development:

  1. Theon-sitewells(TW#1,#7,#9and#lO)yieldsufficientqualityandquantityof potable groundwater and, therefore, it is recommended that they be utilized as future water supply wells.

  2. All future wells drilled on this property must be constructed in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903 and incorporate standard 6.1 metre Iengths of ground sealed casing.

  3. The western portion of the proposed development area (in the vicinity of TW #2, #3, and #12 and #13) are not suitable for future well supplies. ]t is recommended that these wells are abandoned.

i

  1. Further evaluation may result in the need to increase well storage through the use of deeper wells. A sensitivity analysis would be necessary to determine whether or not fresh water would be encountered at deeper depths. The potential for gmundwater mining should be evaluated during the addition of Iot wells. s.

It is recommended that the Iocal Medical Office of Health be notified due to the

sodium concreates in the Text Wells exceeding 20 mgA so that this information may be communicated to Iocal physicians to their use with patients on sodium restricted diets. Elevated sodium can be treated in drinking water through distillation or reverse osmosis.

/’

Groundwater source heat pumps are not recommended.

The locations of Test Wells were approximately based on handheld GPS coordinates. It is recommended that the Test Well locations be confirmed by SurVe70r.

Summary:

In summary, the Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis concludes, with the exception of the northwestern portion of the property, there is an adequate volume of groundwater on-site to

supply the proposed development at an anticipated maximum demand rate of 18.75 Umin for each single family residence. As mentioned in the Functional Servicing Report, dated October

i

Page 28 of 154

10 l

ffll Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

14, 2015, prepared by Josselyn Engineering the proposed development will be serviced by means of private septic systems and wells that will be in accordance with the recommendations

of the Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis, dated October 7, 2015, prepared by exp l

Services Inc.

l

l

3.6Archaeological Assessment

In September 2014 Abacus Archaeological Services was retained to undertake a Stage 1 .)

within 1 kilometer of the subject property. Based on the established potential for archaeological resources within the subject property, a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment was performed on the subject Iands by Abacus Archaeological Services Inc. to collect information on the heritage resources and past uses of the subject Iands. At the present time the Stage 2 survey has resulted in the discovery of six archaeological Ioci of significance. The Report recommends that

l

archaeological assessment of the subject lands. One registered archaeological site was found .u

the six archaeological loci of significance are subject to a Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment to further evaluate their significance and information potential. . j

Based upon the results of the Stage Two Archaeological Assessment, the archaeologist

The identified sites contain finds and features of significance and should be considered archaeologically significant as per section 2.2 Standard 1a.ii and 1b.i of the MTCS Standard and Guidelines (2011). Subsequently a Stage 3 archaeological assessment is

i

consultant made the following recommendations regarding the subject lands:

recommended for each site Iocation which should take the form of a 1x1 m test unit

l

-j

i

Portions of the property which have been evaluated as having no or low potential based upon the Stage 2 identification of physical features of no or low archaeological potential, including permanently wet conditions, exposed bedrock and extreme slopes greater than 20o contain no potential and should be considered clear of archaeological concern.

l

@

l

l

excavation on a five metre grid with additional units amounting to 20% of the grid unit total as per the standards for small post-contact sites where it is not yet evident that the level of cultural heritage value or interest will result in a recommendation to proceed to Stage 4 (in compliance with Table 3.1 in the Standards and Guidelines).

Summary

l

.?

As recommended by the Stage Two Archaeological Assessment Interim Report, a Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment is currently underway on the six identified sites of archaeological significance. It is expected that the Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment will be completed by the end of 2015 and will be submitted to appropriate authorities and agencies upon completion.

J

Page 29 of 154

Hl Planning Justification Report - collins Lake Estates

11

3.7Stormwater Management Report

A Stormwater Management Report for the Collins Lake Subdivision, dated October 27, 2C)15 was prepared by Josselyn Engineering to review the Storrnwater Management Requirements for Collins Lake Subdivision, and to make recommendations for the inclusion of storrnwater management works necessary for the servicing of the development.

t?-

The Report notes that given that the development does not represent a significant increase to peak flows and lands drain directly to Collins Lake, the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) has indicated that there is no requirement to control post development flows to predevelopment levels. As in accordance with CRCA requirements, storrnwater management for the development shall consist of implementing quality control for the road surfaces. These quality control measures will consist of lot-level and conveyance practices, otherwise known as Low Impact Development, as recommended by the CRCA. The recommended Low Impact Development Storrnwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for new developments include site design strategies that minimize n.inoff and lot Ievel conveyance practices, these practices are referred to as structural and non-structural and include the following: Structural BMP’s

Surface storage lnfiltration

Vegetative measures Non-structural BMP’s

Land use planning Setbacks and buffer zones

Good housekeeping measures.

In addition to the use of LIDs, enhanced 1 metre flat bottom roadside ditches will be used to

provide quality control for the new road surfaces. In order to accommodate these widened roadside ditches, it is recommended that 23 metre road allowances be provided to accommodate the widened roadside ditches. This has been considered in the design of the Draft Plan of Subdivision and is the recommended right of way width for all proposed local roads. Summary

In summary, the stormwater management for the development consists of implementing Low Impact Development Practices as recommended by the CRCA. The Analysis of Stormwater Management Requirements for the Collins Lake Estates Subdivision, dated October 27 , 2015, prepared by Josselyn Engineering appears to demonstrate that the use of lot-Ievel and conveyance practices used in a treatment train approach will provide adequate quality and

quantity control for the development. Further to the above, the report notes that although the practices are not intended for use of flood control, the nature of the development does not

!

Page 30 of 154

ffil Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

12

represent a significant increase to peak flows and will assist with mitigating post development flows.

3.8 Transportation Impacts There are sufficient access points to the boundary roads from the subject lands, which will provide a dispersion of traffic to Lakefield Drive.

l

l

I

-.)

i

-j

l

j

l

The impact on the local road network is expected to be negatable as local roads can provide the capacity to accommodate the trips that would be anticipated based on an additional 50 lots. The Traffic Impact Study may be submitted at a later stage of the approval process if deemed necessary to determine if the existing road network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed development.

Page 31 of 154

%l Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

13

4 Policy Context

The following sections analyze the relevant statutory policy documents to determine if the proposed development is supported by the planning framework and represents good planning. These documents include the Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement, the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 and the Cataraqui Conservation Authority Regulations (0. Reg 145/06).

4.lPlanning Act R.S.0. 1990 (as amended 2011) Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act states"in considering a draft plan of subdivision, regard shall be had, among other matters, to the health, safety, convenience, accessibility for persons with disability and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to, a) the effect of development of the proposed subdivision on matters of provincial interest as referred to in Section 2;

b) whether the proposed subdivision is premature or in the public interest;

c) whether the plan conforms to the Official Plan and adjacent plans of subdivision if any; d) the suitability of the Iand for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided; e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations and highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them; f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots;

g) the restrictions or proposed restrictions, if any, on the Iand proposed to be subdivided or the buildings and stmctures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on

l

adjoining Iand;

h) conservation of natural resources and flood control; i) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services; j) the adequacy of schools sites;

k) the area of Iand, if any, within the proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes;

I) the extent to which the plan’s design optimizes the aVailable supply, means of supplJing, efficient use and conservation of energy; and,

Page 32 of 154

%l Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

14 s

The proposed development appropriately considers the above provisions of -the Planning Act, which is described further in Section 8.6 of the Report.

l

control matters relating to any development on the Iand, if the Iand is also located within a site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this act.”

i

m) the interrelationship between the design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan

r

Page 33 of 154

l?i Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

53

l

l

  1. 4 Nqtttrazl Areas and Buffers:

The Environmental Impact Assessment, dated October 19, 20’l5 concludes that development is not expected to result in any negative impacts to the ecological integrity of natural features are expected as a 120 metre buffer from the Provincially Significant Wetland will be maintained. Further to the above, provisions will also be placed within the subdivision agreement to address appropriate restrictions related to tree clearing and septic/building locations adjacent to the slopes located at the back of lots 25 to 31 as recommended in the Environmental Impact Assessment, dated October 19, 2015.

7.5Road Widening: A road widening block (Block 53) of approximately 4 metres wide is located along Lakefield Drive.

Page 34 of 154

ffil Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

54

The following section contains a discussion of various planning matters and provides justification in relation to the proposed development and the proposed Zoning By-Iaw Amendment and Drafl

l l

8 Planning Opinion and Justification

i

Plan of Subdivision applications.

  1. I Land Use Compatibility The development supports the policies found in the 2014 Provincial Policy, the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, the Draft County of Frontenac Official Plan, and the Draff Township of South Frontenac Official Plans including those relating to maintenance of the rural

The proposed development will consist of 51 rural estate residential lots which will be phased, and that are consistent with the large frontage and generous Iot sizes of the area including the

l

character of the area.

adjacent Lyons Landing subdivision.

ff

i l

Parkland will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. At a rate of 5% the requirement for Phase “I of the development will be approximately 2.99 ha (7.39 acres). However any deficiency in Parkland will be addressed in future phases of the Collins Lake Estates development in accordance with the Planning Act. A public parkette with a total size of approximately O.456 ha (1 .11 acres) is proposed for Phase 1 of the development.

l

8.2Parkland/Amenties

It is recognized that the size of each lot will absorb ample parkland amenity space for recreational purposes.

l

i

J

j

The proposed development meets the applicable policies of the Official Plan and supporting studies submitted with the development applications indicate that there is no negative impact expected to significant natural heritage features. Further to the above natural heritage features on the subject lands will remain protected as all new development will be setback a minimum of 120 metres from the PSW and Collins Lake to ensure separation from sensitive vegetation and habitat. Provisions will also be placed in the subdivision agreement to address appropriate restrictions related to tree clearing and septic/building locations adjacent to the slopes located at the back of lots 25 to 31 as recommended in the Environmental Impact Assessment.

l

8.3Natural Heritage Features

l

l

Page 35 of 154

%l Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

55

8.41nfrastructure

The proposed development will not result in the unjustified expansion of infrastructure as the development will be serviced by privately owned wells and private septic systems. Further to the above, the proposed development can be serviced by existing levels of municipal services. For example, garbage pickup and snow removal are currently available in the adjacent subdivision along Maple Crest Court and Copper Kettle Drive. The Iots in the proposed development will front on a proposed internal road network that is a natural extension of Maple Crest Court and Copper Kettle Drive

8.5 Transportation The subject lands are well served by the existing road network and the proposed development will have access from Maplecrest Court and Copper Kettle Drive through Lakefield Drive as it is intended that the internal road network proposed for the subdivision will serve as a natural extension of the adjacent subdivision (Lyons Landing).

8.6Draft Plan of Subdivision (Section 51 (24) of the Planning Ac0

l

In accordance with Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act, the following section describes the proposed draft plan of subdivision in relation to the criteria in the Planning Act. It is our opinion that:

a.

The proposed draff plan of subdivision supports the matters of Provincial Interest outlined in Section 2 of the Planning Act, particularly through the protection of natural areas, natural features, and the efficient use of infrastructure, the protection of public health and safety and the promotion of development that is designed to be compatible with the rural character of the area.

b. The proposed development draft plan of subdivision is in the public interest as it provides needed housing in the Township that is compatible with the rural character of the area without impacting ecological integrity of the natural heritage features. C.

The proposed draft plan of subdivision conforms to the applicable Official Plan policies and has been designed to be compatible with the rural character of the area.

d. The land is suitable to be subdivided based on an identification of precise

development limits and natural features that have been assessed, which are outlined in the Environmental Impact Assessment and the Hydrogeological Report and Terrain Analysis.

Page 36 of 154

The number, width, Iocation and proposed grades and elevations of road are Iinked to the existing municipal and county road network and is designed based on

l

e.

56

i

ffil Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates Municipal standards to achieve safe access; f.

The proposed lot dimensions are appropriate and are consistent with good

l

g. The subject property is not unnecessarily restricted or encumbered.

i

subdivision design principles.

h. The proposed draft plan of subdivision ensures for protection of the identified natural heritage resources and is adequately setback from the appropriate hazard features

l

.?J

to ensure flood control;

i. The proposed draft plan of subdivision is proposed to be serviced by private wells and septic systems as it is located in a rural area where municipal services are

  1. The proposed draft plan of subdivision utilizes an efficient lot and road pattern that is optimal for servicing, grading and Storrnwater management, which will contribute to the conservation of energy and the efficient use of land and infrastructure.

l

l l

j

i

‘?

subject Iands are not located within a Site Plan Control Area as designated ,Xll. ’ m. The under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or subsection 114 (2) of the City of Toronto Act,

l

k. The proposed draft plan of subdivision provides the appropriate blocks to be conveyed (exclusive for highway and natural features) for public purposes.

i

j. The proposed draft plan of subdivision is not anticipated to need a school and students are expected to be bused to adjacent schools.

j

unavailable.

i

l

l

l

It is our opinion that the proposed draft plan of subdivision satisfies the criteria under the Planning Act, and represents good planning.

l

(

Page 37 of 154

%l Planning Justification Report - Collins Lake Estates

57

9 Conclusion

Based on our review of the applicable planning policies, it is our opinion that the proposed development of 51 detached dwellings on the Iands is appropriate from a land use planning perspective as it is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), and conforms to the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan (2003). Furtherrnore, it is our opinion, for the reasons noted herein, that the proposed development supports emerging planning policies of the County and Township and other key studies and initiatives in the Township. It is our opinion, that the proposal is appropriate from a land use planning perspective for the following principle reasons: l

l

The proposed development will not result in the unjustified expansion of municipal services as the development will be serviced by private wells and septic systems, which will be maintained at the owner’s expense; The PPS allows for Iimited residential development within Rural Areas; The proposed development has been appropriately designed to ensure that significant natural heritage features are protected, where appropriate; and The proposed development would contribute 51 additional units to the Township’s overall housing supply, which would assist the Township in meeting their growth targets.

It is our opinion that the plan of subdivision application and zoning by-law amendment application represent good planning and should proceed through the process prescribed under the Planning Act.

‘?? ffi $7

Page 38 of 154

ATTACHMENT#4

w?

7

MALROZ ENGINEER?NG INCORPORATED

via: e-mail

Febmary 25, 2016 File: 907-100.00

308 Wellington Street 2"” Floor

Kingston, ON K7K 7A8

Mr. Joe Gallivan

Canada

Director of Planning & Economic Development

613-548-3446 www.malroz.com

County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road

Glenburnie, Ontario, KOH 1 SO

Subject: Peer Review of Hydrogeology, Terrain Analyses and Servicing Reports, Proposed Residential Subdivision, Part of Lots 25 to 30, Concession 7, Collins Lake, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac Dear Mr. Gallivan:

Malroz Engineering Inc. (Malroz) is pleased to present our peer review of the proposed Collins Lake plan of subdivision. Malroz was retained by you to peer review the hydrogeological assessment, servicing options and terrain analyses. We were furnished with the following documents by you:

  1. Hydrogeology and Terrain Analysis Report Collins Lake, South Frontenac, Ontario, prepared by Exp Associates Inc., dated October 7,

  3. Servicing Report for Collins Estates Subdivision, prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc., dated October 9, 2015.

The purpose of this peer review was to assess if the proponent has used generally accepted practices to support their conclusions. Unless otherwise specified this peer review does not consider conformity with local By-laws and or the municipal Official Plan considerations. The peer review does not represent a legal opinion regarding compliance with regulations and guidelines. The following is a list of regulatory documents that guide the peer review for the hydrogeology and terrain analysis studies for proposed privately serviced developments: Hydrogeological Technical Information Requirements for Land DevelopmentApplications, MOE, April 1995; *

Procedure D-s-3, (Formerly Appendix C) Servicing Options Statement, MOE, Last Revision March 1995.

Procedure D-s-4 Technical Guideline for Individual On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment, MOE, April 1 996; Procedure D-s-s Technical Guidelines for Private Wells: Water Supply Assessment, MOE, March 1995; Env?ronmenlal Scienlisls & Engineers KINGSTON O TORONTO O OTTAWA

Page 39 of 154

County of Frontenac Peer Review, Collins Lake Draft Plan of Subdivision

Page 2 907-100.00

Manual of Policy, Procedures and Guidelines for Onsite Sewage Systems, Referring to Ontario Regulation 3 74/81 under Part V?? of the Environmental Protection Act, MOE, 1982.

1.O Background

The proposed subdivision is located in the Part of Lots 25 to 30, Concession 7 Township of South Frontenac (the subject site). The subject site is located south of Inverary and is bordered by Perth Road to the west, Lakefield Drive to the east, Holmes Road to the north, and Collins Lake to the south. The total development for the site is for a 324 hectare (ha) parcel of land. However the development is proposed in two phases, with this report addressing the first phase of development. The first phase applies to developing 59.9 ha of land consisting of 51 proposed residential lots ranging in size from O.8 ha to 1.6 ha, with an average size of l .06 ha. Access to the residential lands is reportedly provided by the construction of two new entrances from Lakefield Drive. Open ditches will be constmcted for development drainage. Each lot will be serviced by private septic systems. The subject site was described as open agricultural land and farrnland with areas of densely

packed trees. The surrounding land use was described as residential and agricultural. The soils were reported as a Farnnington loam and Bonhead sandy loam described as silt clay till with some sand and gravel ranging in thickness from approximately O to 2.8 meters. Well drilling identified shale approximately 1.8 to 3.7 metres below grade (mbg) overlying limestone up to 47 mbg. In the west end of the subject site it was reported that sandstone or soapstone was underlying the limestone. At the east end of the subject site it was reported that sandstone, quartz and granite was underlying the limestone. Eight test wells were advanced at and around the subject site and five existing wells were reported to be inspected and rehabilitated. The consultant reported that the wells were constmcted into the limestone or granite. Water was found during drilling from approximately 17 to 44 mbg. Static water levels were reported as 4 to 26 mbg. The report identifies four bedroom homes are proposed for the development.

2.O Comments

We offer the following comments on the Hydrogeological Assessment, Terrain Analysis and Servicing Options prepared by Exp Associates Inc (Exp:) for your review and consideration.

Malroz Engineering Inc.

Page 40 of 154

County of Frontenac Peer Review, Collins Lake Draft Plan of Subdivision

Page 3 907-100.00

General

l . The report references a 1990 report prepared for the site by Oliver, Mangione, McCalla & Associates Ltd. We request the proponent provide us with a copy of this report. 2. Table 2 identifies well depth in meters. Test wells TW #4, #5 and #8 show depths greater than any of the wells drilled in 2015. The consultant should clarify if these depths are in meters or feet.

  1. The consultant should identify if any updated hydrogeologic data was collected from the pre-existing test wells during the current investigation.
  2. In Table 3a the distance between TW #12 and TW #13 from TW #7 appears to be truncated. Can the consultant confirm that the distances are 1,282 and 1,058 meters

respectively. Groundwater Quam%

The groundwater quantity assessment by the consultant was undertaken by conducting pumping and recovery tests of the newly installed wells installed in accordance with O. Reg. 903 for the purposes of residential water supply. Wells were pumped at a rate of between 17.4 to 20 litres per minute. Drawdown ranged from approximately O.6 to 29 metres. Two of the wells went dry and four of the eight pumped wells had insufficient water to complete the six hour pumping test. On-site drawdown in observation wells was observed to be up to O.18 metres and in the monitored nearby residential wells was up to O.65 metres.

We offer the following comments on the suitability of the site to supply adequate quantity of groundwater for the proposed development. s. Section 2.2 identifies that wells may have been drilled into granite at the east end of the site. Section 3.2 identifies that wells were constmcted into limestone or sandstone. We

request that the consultant clarify this conflicting infortnation. 6. Test well TW #2 was drilled to a depth of 66 mbg and test well TW #l2 was drilled to a depth of 36 mbg. Based on the Figure 2 it appears they are near to each other. Water level monitoring data has not been provided for TW #12. This data should be provided and any interpretation furnished. 7. Figure 2 appears to identify test well location, static water level elevation in select wells and the inferred groundwater flow direction. We request this figure be clarified to include:

a. The blue arrow appears to be on top of TW #9. b. No legend is provided to identify what the blue arrow represents nor the basis of the numbers associated with the wells. C.

d.

Test well symbols are overly large to accurately identify well location. Proposed lot layout such as building location, primary and secondary septic location are not provided.

Malroz Engineering Inc.

Page 41 of 154

County of Frontenac Peer Review, Collins Lake Draft Plan of Subdivision

Page 4 907-100.00

  1. Section 3.4 speaks to groundwater flow direction. Clarification as to what wells were included in the flow direction assessment is required.

  2. Test well TW #8 is identified as artesian, the consultant should address how this may impact recommendations on well installation.

  3. Section 3.5.2 speaks to four assumptions made by the consultant in assessing the aquifer pump test data. We request that the consultant demonstrate that the assumptions are valid for the site.

  4. We concur with section 3.5.3 that test wells TW #2, #3, #12 and #l4 provided

insufficient yield and are not suitable as residential supply wells and do not support development of the site as a residential subdivision. 12. Test wells TW #1, #7 and #9 were reported not to recover to 95% of pre-test static water level conditions within 24 hours following their pump tests. In section 3.5.3 the consultant identifies that this may be related to local usage demands. a. Test well TW #l is approximately 950 meters firom Lakefield drive to the east. We do not agree that local usage demands would impact recovery at this well. b. Test wells TW #7 and #9 are two of the closest wells to the existing residential development along T.akefie1d drive. We concur that there may be interference from the existing well users. We consider this significant and may be indicative along with TW #2, #3, #l2 and #l4 that the aquifer is susceptible to mining of the groundwater resource and result in interference to existing or future groundwater users. The consultant should elaborate on the mining of the aquifer and potential interference to existing and future groundwater users. C. Section 3.5.5 identifies the potential to deepen wells for additional storage and the potential for groundwater mining. The consultant should further evaluate these concerns. This should consider the artesian conditions at TW #8.

  1. We concur with the statement in section 3.5.5 that TW #10 has adequate volume of groundwater to support residential water supply.
  2. Based on Section 3 of the report we are of the opinion that additional characterization of the site hydrogeology is required to support development including delineation of areas with insufficient groundwater yield, artesian conditions and susceptibility to long term mining of the aquifer. Groundwater Qual’Uy

Groundwater quality was assessed by the consultant through sampling of groundwater from eight test wells as well as from nine water wells at current residential properties. Results were compared to the Ontario Drinking water Standards (ODWS). Three test-wells exceeded ODWS for Health related parameters and all eight wells exceed the aesthetic parameters. Exceedances were also reported for total coliform at four of the on-site test wells and six of the nearby residential wells. Three of the nearby residential wells had detectable e-colt. Bacterial detections were reported to be related to adjacent farming activities. The consultant identified that the local Medical Officer of Health had been provided notification regarding the sodium identified in the groundwater.

Malroz Engineering Inc.

Page 42 of 154

County of Frontenac Peer Review, Collins Lake Draft Plan of Subdivision

Page s 907-100.00

  1. Considering the identified potential impacts from agricultural operations, consideration should be given to assessing the groundwater for herbicides and pesticides as well as any other parameter the consultant deems necessary based on the results of their initial work.
  2. We concur that test wells TW #2, #3, #l2 and #l3 are not suitable for potable use based

on the water quality analyses and should be abandoned. We concur that test well TW # 1 may benefit from additional development prior to confirmation of suitability for potable use or not.

  1. Further comment on the occurrence of E-colt at nearby wells and the potential impact to the development is required.
  2. The consultant should propose and evaluate options for managing the potable water quality based on their site evaluation. Terrain Analysis

The site was identified as having fine grained soil consisting of silty clay till with some sand and minor gravel. A previous report, that was not furnished, identified an average soil thickness of 0.3 meters.

  1. As noted in comment 6, we request that lot layouts be provided for review.

  2. The water surplus value used in the nitrate calculation appears to account for the total annual average precipitation, rather than the evapotranspiration surplus of water that contributes to recharge and dilution. The consultant should revisit this calculation. Servicitag Report

We offer the following comments on the Servicing Options report prepared by Josselyn Engineering Inc (Josselynn) for your review and consideration. 21. Section 2 identifies overburden thickness ranging from O to s meters. This conflicts with the Exp report and should be clarified. 22. In section 2 at the bottom of page 1, the sentence appears incomplete. We request that

the missing information be provided for review. 23. Section 4 identifies that the lots will be serviced by individual septic systems in accordance with the previously mentioned 1990 report. The consultant should identify whether the recommendations made in 1990 remain valid considering the Exp report did

not speak to all septic system design parameters. We reserve final comment until we have been provided a copy of the 1990 report, and Exp discussion on the matter. 24. Section s and 7 identify that the Exp report supported development of the 51 lots. We disagree that this was the conclusion of the Exp report. The consultant should revisit this conclusion considering the Exp report and the comments above.

Malroz Engineering Inc.

Page 43 of 154

County of Frontenac

Page 6

Peer Review, Collins Lake Draft Plan of Subdivision

907-100.00

Summary

The hydrogeology and terrain analysis prepared by Exp and servicing report prepared by Josselyn identifies a number of concerns with respect to the water quantity and quality that we recommend be addressed to the County’s satisfaction prior to approval of the proposed subdivision. Four of the eight test wells installed during the investigation are recomtnended to be abandoned and additional development of one well is recommended by Exp. Considering the variability of the groundwater quality and quantity data we are of the opinion that the current studies do not support servicing of the site through private individual services at this time. 3.O Closure

This is not an audit and as such is not intended to detect facts that were concealed, or omissions in the report. Unless otherwise stated, the peer review does not consider local By-laws nor does it represent a legal opinion regarding compliance with regulations and guidelines. We hope this process has been helpful and please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions or concerns. Yours truly, Malroz Engineering Inc.

6’ L o’ ?er /’ Q*

‘%

% ?lz @

eJ

J!/,

n’ ij

‘4

? ///

ROSERTPYKE .r X+?‘a0"1111 “’ ea

.> PRACTl81NGMEMBER ,) 1855

per: JohnPyke,P.Geo. ‘?HTAR12 Environmental Geoscienti’

reviewed: ?id Malcolm Project Manager

Malroz Engiiieering [iic.

Page 44 of 154

ATTACHMENT #5 l

i: C=ANADA ,,=PO5TES l=-!-

I

Fromanywhere… Departout… +r’s qtuasna to any>ne jus@u'4 mus

J

i. t

m

?OST

CANADA

I!.

l

z

March 7, 2016.

Reference File: ’tOT-2015/001

County of Frontenac Director of Planning and Economic Development Mr. Joe Gallivan,

Tharik you for contacting Canada Post regarding plans for a new sub-division- Collins Lake Estates Part of (ots 25 to 30, concession 7 in the township of Storrington, township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac.

Please see Canada Post’s feedback regarding the proposal, below. Service type and Iocation

  1. Canada Post will provide mail delivery service to the development through Community Mailbox.
  2. 1 Site to be situated between Iot ‘16 and 17.

Municipal requirements

  1. Please update our office if the project description changes so lhat we may determine the impact (if any).

  2. Should this subdivision application be approved, please provide notification of the new civic addresses as soon as possible.

Developer timeline and installation

  1. Please provide Canada Post with the excavation date for the first foundation/first phase as well as the date development work is scheduled tci begin. Finalty, please provide the expected installation date(s) for the CMB(s,

Please see Appendix A for any additional requirements for this developer, Regards,

Peggy Deslauriers 613.294-7629

DELIVERY PLANNING PO BOX 8037 oTTAwA T CSC OTTAWA ON KIG 3H6

www.canadapost.ca

www.postesc;*riada.ca

ATTACHMENT #6

Lindsay Mills From:

Treena Garrison treena@mygarrison.com

Sent:

March-28-16 2:40 AM

To:

Lindsay Mills; Reid Shepherd

Cc:

Bill Card

Subject:

Submission Re: Collins Lake Estates

l

Page 45 of 154

Please acknowledge (by return email) receipt of this communication.

We have received partial information from the Township of South Frontenac. It appears that Part 1 of 2 needs to be broken into two smaller pieces and sent that way (smaller versions) via email. We request that Part 1 be provided, in total.

We have a number of comments and concerns about the Proposed Plan of Subdivision. Below, some, although not necessarily all inclusive, comments will be made regarding the proposal.

It would seem to be more appropriate to consider rezoning of lands for any future stages that may be proposed at the time(s) of submission as opposed to a current rezoning application for all lands (Lots 25 to 30, inclusive). The reports submitted from 1990s investigation/studies are pertinent only to that period in time and in no way have regard for any development and construction of additional residential dwellings in Plan 1713 and Plan

@

13M-56, neighbouring properties, to the East.

The studies and peer review conclusions determine that sufficient potable water is not existent on the subject

Iands.

No development that could negatively impact by taking away the water supply to existing or future dwellings in Plan 1713 and Plan 13M-56 should be approved. This is a major concern.

The size of the Lots does not appear to meet the Official Plan and/or by-Iaws which call for the minimum size requirement of two acres ( .8 of a hectare). Smaller Lot sizes cause additional stress on water supply down grade in both (Plans 1713 & 13M-56) from both a quality and quantity perspective. There does not appear to be any report from the MOE or the Health Unit to establish the type of proposed septic systems. Noting the shallow soil depth , nitrate issues and again, sewage flowing to the noted Plans mentioned earlier, Lot sizes, septic types and water flow to neighbouring dwellings is an issue and particularly

noting proposed one acre Lot sizes.

Volume of traffic flowing onto Lakefield Drive is a negative for the residents of both neighbouring Plans of Subdivision and the newly proposed area. The number of entrances proposed onto Lakefield Drive ( It appears that 7 entrances are proposed) are considered dangerous and will slow traffic flow.

The entrance onto Lakefield Drive in the vicinity of Copper Kettle Drive is in the area of a reduced site line approaching from the North that results in a hidden .entrance. Safety is a major concern as is traffic noise, dust, volume, etc. *

The slope of the land will result in water running from the newly Proposed area (as it now does) and any change in the vicinity of Copper Kettle/Lakefield may result in flooding. In the past it has been necessary to ensure that the culvert(s) crossing Lakefield and the ditching are always kept clean to allow flow, or the water will spill across Lakefield heading toward residential dwellings in Plan 1713 . Any alteration may result in flooding. The run off of storm water needs to be managed.

No reportS or letterS of conclusion from CRCA or the Health Unit have been received about the current proposal.

It is noted that additional comments, reports and information have been requested in the Peer Review. This information is imperative in order to make any decision about this Proposed development and is required for review and comment by the Public. 1

l

Page 46 of 154 *

Consideration of this Proposal appears very premature based on the information supplied and yet based on only that information provided, it seems apparent that this Proposal should not be approved.

If you have now received all information required to consider this proposal, would you please email it and confirm that’s all you have. Otherwise, please confirm that what you have provided is all that you have. I/we reserve the opportunity to comment further. Sincerely, Treena Garrison

& 358701 0ntario Limited

2

Page 47 of 154

th

March31 ,2016

Lindsay Mills Planner/Deputy Clerk Township of South Frontenac Lindsay,

In response to the letter received regarding the Public Meeting to be held April 5,2016, (there was no number to reference), I would like it on record that I am definitely opposed to any more lots which have to be accessed off Lakefield Drive as indicated in the proposed plan for Collins Lake Subdivision. Given the time frame about the meeting on April s, 2016, I am trying to rearrange my schedule to attend, but in the event I am unable to attend, and with the importance and impact of this application, I felt a need to put my concerns in writing.

The wells in this area are of the utmost concern. A few years ago when they were proposing a phase of Lyons Landing, we had a consortium of concerned neighbors attend a council meeting and brought our issues forward. The applicant said they had the wells all tested. I said, you may have had them tested, but there is a huge difference between testing them and the effect it has on present neighboring wells in the surrounding area when in use daily. Sure enough I was correct. I can’t do more then two loads of laundry at a time now, without waiting for the water to recover. And have developed sulfur water. I dropped off a water sample to the health board and it showed 3x the level of salt that should be used for human intake.

Before all these wells were drilled around me the fields used to be Farmed.

The Farmer used our water at times to fill up his tanks. That could not happen now as there is too many wells and not enough water. Am I concerned about water levels? Your absolutely right I am. The potential of another 51 working wells, is a huge concern of having even lower water levels or running out of water.

Page 48 of 154

Lakefield Drive can’t hold any more cars. Too busy now. Presently, it is very dangerous to walk on this road. When the township resurfaced the roads they took away the shoulders and raised the road. First let me state, they raised the road in front of my house 14? and what I don’t understand is, I was the highest point on the road and I have never seen water run uphill, so why did they raise the road in front of my house? I had my driveway paved not too long ago and now it looks terrible. If I had known they would have raised the road, I would have waited. Without the shoulder and with huge ditches in

spots appox. 3’ deep, when a car now moves down the road, the potential of someone being hit or swiped is high as they have to walk on the road. With an aging population, plus people exercising, more people are out for walks/runs, and with no shoulder, they have created a unsafe situation. We can’t possibly add more vehicle traffic to this. Holmes Road, well, that is a race track which continues onto Lakefield Drive.

I have been passed numerous times on Holmes Road as the person behind me felt the speed limit wasn’t for them to obey. Holmes Road is the only way to access Lakefield Drive, plus the corner of Holmes Road and Division Street is quite the adventure to undertake. Trying to turn left, in the mornings, into town can take some days 3-s minutes in order to get a break in traffic to safely pull out. The traffic on Division street has been increasingly building up. With more homes, subdivisions north of this intersection also using Division Street, it will continually get worse. The application for 51 more homes, which has the potential for another 102 cars daily at this intersection is unimaginable.

What does the traffic studies now say is the number using this intersection? And the number of cars using Holmes Road and Lakefield Drive? What are

the projected number to use this intersection, in s years? That intersection is not big enough now to handle traffic, so what about future projected traffic? What needs to be done to help alleviate the danger, the congestion, and the added traffic on Lakefield Drive and Holmes Road is another entrance/exit to

the subdivision before any application/rezoning is considered. Take Lakefield Drive and attach to Spooner Road, or have these plans revised to include a new entrance/exit from Lakefield Drive through the applicant’s

property straight to Division Steet. It would not only be beneficial for

Page 49 of 154

existing residences in Lyon’s Landing to use, it will lessen the traffic on upper Lakefield Drive, and help solve the traffic issue at the corner of Division and Holmes Road. Will make it easier access for all emergency

vehicles as well. I am not against progress, but I am against not doing things properly, in the proper order and inflicting unnecessary agony on existing residences, because things are not done right first. This is a country environment. Without another exit out of the present Subdivision there should be no more residences allowed.

It’s also interesting to watch how many cars miss the corner turning right off Holmes Road onto Lakefield Drive. You hear the brakes (tires) being slammed on and sure enough they back up to make the corner. The corner is not very visible so unfamiliar people miss it all the time. Corner is visually blocked and there is also a small turning radius leading into the corner. In the winter months there can be 15-20 cars sliding into the ditch, both sides of the road, because they missed the corner. Dangerous ! ! Leading up to this corner, from the west, we have a blind spot. There is a dip in the road that cars disappear in. When you are at the corner on Lakefield Drive and want to turn left on Holmes Road, after you look for oncoming traffic both ways, BEFORE you pull out, a car sometimes appears, seemly out of nowhere, out ofthedip! Another concern is the flying mailboxes. Yes again, because of the man made ditches along Holmes Road and some on Lakefield, the mailboxes are now too close to the road or they are literally on the road. Snowplows have removed them as well as vehicles. We never had this problem to this severity before the road was lifted and shoulders taken away. In fact the mailboxes

(3) for years in front of my house sat silently, but not now. After the road was done, they put the mailboxes literately on the road. I had to ask for gravel dropped off by the township to reconstruct the mailbox footing off the road, but it still could go back further from the road. They are starting to slant as the gravel is settling.

When I attended council previously to voice my concern about fire safety during a Phase of Lyons Landing , I explained to council that there was a house fire that blocked the roadway into and out of Lyon’s Landing which

Page 50 of 154

made some very angry and aggressive people blocked in, for hours. The council at the time, said the probability of that happening again are slim to non. Well, it did happen again and in fact another time as well all in the same area, which blocked the access to Lyon’s Landing, with Firetrucks, volunteer vehicles, inquisitive people along with residents of the subdivision that could not get home and the residents that could not get out. This all happening between, Holmes Road and Kahula Court. There also was the school bus incident that blocked the roadway in this area, plus an accident that stopped traffic. So it happens. Fire Safety and emergency access should be a number one priority, not more lots. It’s not something you play with or can predict. You need to have all places accessible at all times. When the Firetmcks are required to attend a home now in Lyon’s Landing and without shoulders to park on and only one access road in or out, you have to hope nobody is parked in front of your house or it would be difficult to get through. God forbid something happens at the top end of Lakefield Drive to block the road and there is another emergency in the landing and the emergency services can’t get by as the only entrance/exit is blocked. I live here, I know.

Along with some businesses running out of homes in the landing, their vehicles, employee vehicles, trades people going to residences, along with fuel tmcks, water tmcks , dump tmcks, supply trucks and the like, all making daily trips in and out of the subdivision now, you can’t possibly consider adding to the confusion or congestion going into and out of Lakefield Drive. The supply trucks might be the only ones stopping the daily trek into area moving forward.

It’s pretty sad that I have to back into my driveway as the road is so busy to even think about backing out of my driveway. And yes people honk at me while I’m backing into the driveway.

The wild life has almost disappeared. There used to be Deer roaming in the area, not anymore, at least visible. What does the wetland study for the area indicate?

There is a lot of work that needs to be done or well thought out before this

Page 51 of 154

application or rezoning is even considered. It is extremely important to engage some knowledgeable people to assess population growth, and how it will effect the infrastructure we presently have. We need to manage the present traffic issues and most importantly the wells. Feel free to contact me for any question or clarification of facts. Regards, Detrtt’;e Denise Taillon 3190 Lakefield Drive

denisetaillon@yahoo.com

Page 52 of 154

Lindsay Mills From:

Tara Petrie tarataillon@hotmail.com

Sent:

March-31-16 3:44 PM

To:

Lindsay Mills Collins Lake subdivision application

Subject:

March 30, 2016 Lindsay Mills,

Planning Hi Lindsay, I want it to be on record, we are opposed to the application for Collins lake subdivision. I have two small children and have given up taking them for walks down the road. There is no shoulder and it is dangerous to walk on the road without shoulders. There is too much traffic on Holmes Road now. Is there any plans for another exit to Division Street for these homes rather then Holmes Road? It is hard to get out of my driveway safely now.

Regards, Mike and Tara Petrie 4326 Holmes Road

Inverary, ON

1

Page 53 of 154 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LANDS FROM SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-7-H) TO SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-29-H) AND COMMUNITY FACILITY ZONE (CF); PART LOTS 28, 29 & 30, CONCESSION VII, DISTRICT OF STORRINGTON: MAYBACH GROUP INC.

WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to a parcel of land located in Part of Lots 28, 29 & 30, Concession VII, in the District of Storrington. NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. THAT Schedule ‘C’ to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Special Residential (R-7-H) to Special Residential (R-29-H) and Community Facility (CF) for those lands shown on the attached map designated as Schedule " 1 ?.

  2. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section R-29 immediately after section R-28 (Part Lot 19, Concession II, Storrington District), to read as follows: R-29 (Part Lots 28, 29 & 30, Concession VII, Storrington District) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 12.3 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Residential (R-29), the following special provisions shall apply: Lot Frontage (Minimum)

55 metres (180 :ft.)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply.

  1. The holding (?h?) symbol is to be removed by by-law to permit development only when a Subdivision Agreement between the property-owner and the Township has been entered into and registered on title of the lands.
  2. THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, either on the date of passage or as otherwise provided by section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this day of , 2016. Read a first and second time this

day of , 2016.

Read a third time and finally passed this day of , 2016.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 54 of 154

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

(STORRINGTON DISTRICT)

ffl

SCHEDULE ‘1’

Pt”? ? ?i lr )1-?’..-.?.-‘fffflrl

BY-LAW No. 2016,

?FRO )

K m

,.X-‘xl—: ‘–W*E ‘17 , yJ S

i

M

l

i

l

l

l

L,

l

i

4mm

rJ rJ

11

%

) l i

'

l

,’

.[

/+‘aX. a..)r!:a ,,/ %s. ,a-. ./’ S,’

o so ioo 200 300 400

..-’ 1 C o 11 r n s L a k e[ Meters’

=-aa-:

l

THIS SCHEDULE “1” TO BY-LAW No. 2016-

PASSEDTHIS “oDAYOF ,2016 MAYOR CLERK

Collins Lake Estates, South Frontenac Public Meeting: April 5, 2016 7:00pm Municipal Council Chambers 4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario

Page 55 of 154

Team Members

Page 56 of 154

Subject Lands

Aerial Photograph of Subject Lands

Page 57 of 154

Context Map

County of Frontenac Official Plan (2014) Official Plan Designation Land Use Designations: Rural Lands and Natural Heritage System Rural Lands: • Limited residential development is permitted within the Rural Designation. • The Official Plan encourages development that is compatible with the rural and natural landscape of the County.

Page 58 of 154

Natural Heritage System: • No development is proposed within the significant wetland. • Appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented throughout the development.

South Frontenac Official Plan (2003) Official Plan Designation

Page 59 of 154

Land Use: Rural and Provincially Significant Wetland Rural: • Limited residential development is permitted within the Rural area. • Development is consistent with the lot size policies of the Official Plan. • All lots can be appropriately serviced by private wells and individual septic systems. • All proposed lots will have public road frontage. Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW): • Development will be located at least 120 metres outside of the PSW. • No negative impacts are expected.

South Frontenac Zoning By-law 2003-75 (Revised 2012) Zoning Permissions R7-h – Special Residential Holding Zone EP-2 – Environmental Protection Zone R7-h Special Residential Zone Permitted Uses: • single detached dwelling; • a public park; • a dock; and, • accessory buildings or uses to the above uses.

Page 60 of 154

EP-2 Environmental Protection Zone Permitted Uses: • existing uses; • walkways, boardwalks and a dock; • water intake pumping station for irrigation; and, • conservation uses excluding buildings.

Applications Submitted • Application for a Draft Plan of Subdivision submitted to the County to permit the creation of 51 residential estate lots on three proposed new roads. • Application for a Zoning By-law Amendment submitted to the Township of South Frontenac to permit a minimum lot frontage of 55 metres.

Page 61 of 154

Studies Submitted in Support of the Applications The following studies and reports were submitted in support of the applications: • Planning Justification Report • Environmental Impact Assessment • Hydrogeology and Terrain Analysis • Servicing Report • Stormwater Management Report • Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Page 62 of 154

Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Proposed Zoning Proposed Zones: • Special Residential (R-29); and, • Open Space (OS). Special Residential (R-29): • Single detached dwellings; • Minimum lot size of 2 acres (0.80 ha) • Minimum Lot Frontage of 55 metres; and, • Proposed Lot Frontage is consistent with the adjacent Lyons Landing subdivision. Page 63 of 154

Open Space (OS) Proposed Use: • A public park.

Draft Plan of Subdivision Development Statistics: Residential- Estate Lots: Parkette/Open Space: Road Widening: Roads: TOTAL:

Units: Area (ha): 51 54.415 0.456 0.371 4.663 51 59.905

• Development will consist of lots ranging in size from 2 acres to 4 acres. • Density: 0.85 units per hectare (uph) Page 64 of 154

Proposed Parkland/Open Space

Page 65 of 154

Commenting Agencies

Page 66 of 154

• Township of South Frontenac: o Planning Department; o Economic Development; o Building Department; o Public Works Department; o Fire Chief; and, o Parks and Recreation Department. • County of Frontenac: o Planning Department; o Economic Development; and, o Emergency Services. • County of Frontenac Peer Reviewer: o Malroz Engineering. • Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority • Kingston Frontenac Lennox & Addington Health Unit

Planning Process and Next Steps • An additional resubmission may be required based on comments received from commenting agencies.

• An application for a Draft Plan of Subdivision will then go forward to County Council for approval. • An application for a Zoning By-law Amendment will then to go forward to Township Council for approval.

Page 67 of 154

Vision for Collins Lake Estates

Page 68 of 154

Page 69 of 154

Minutes of Committee of the Whole March 8, 2016 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Chmbers Meeting # 7 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

a)

Mayor Vandewal called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

a)

Sheri Vivian, re: Fireworks and Noise By-law Sheri Vivian presented a petition to Council that requests a review of By-law 2015-41 that allows fireworks only during Victory Day and July 1- 4 holidays. She felt the by-law restrictions do not take into account that Victoria Day holiday can at times be very chilly and not conducive to firework displays and that July 1 is not longer a long weekend, yet the two long weekends in August and September, firework discharges are not allowed.She felt the fireworks and noise by-law was not well publicized. Mayor Vandewal stated that the request to reconsider the by-law will be referred to Corporate Services for discussion and recommendations.

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Harrowsmith Intersection Environmental Assessment The proposed changes were reviewed and discussed by Council. There is a preferred solution of installing traffic lights at Road 38 and Wilton Road with the closure of Colebrook Road and Ottawa Street that was presented to the Public Services Committee There is a public meeting scheduled for March 21, 2016 at the Harrowsmith S & A Hall to present the preferred alternative to the public.

b)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Sydenham Village Parking and Traffic Restrictions Written comments received from Stephen Kapusta and Wilma Kenny were distributed to Council. The proposed changes include changing Cross Street from a two-way to oneway where eastbound traffic will be prohibited.This will allow for additional

Page 70 of 154 Committee of the Whole March 8, 2016 parking capacity on Cross Street while still allowing local traffic flow and also facilitate passage of emergency vehicles while the funeral home is in use. The report addressed restricted parking areas and the time frame associated with the restrictions for various streets in the village. Comments from Council included the provision for accessible parking spaces, clarification and improving the language regarding the “maximum"period allowed” on the by-law schedule and when would the section of George Street Bedford Road be considered It was clarified that when Bedford Road reconstruction takes place the George St, Bedford Road and Portland Avenue intersection will be reviewed. c)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Closing of Road Allowance in Part of Lot 22 between Concessions VII, Loughborough Council was supportive of the closure and transfer of the unused portion of the road allowance. Deputy Mayor Sutherland supported the closing but thought that a land swap had happened when Leland Road was realigned and he felt that the applicant should not be charged. Staff were directed to review files for proof of this land swap and to do a title search. The CAO noted the policy in place for the sale of road allowances and asked to what degree does Council want to consider alternatives. While it was recognized that the $11,000.00 may be excessive, it was recognized that there will be legal and surveying costs that the applicant would be responsible for.

d)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Draft 2015 Financials Council was not supportive of funding the $118,837.00 for Centennial Park out of Parkland but to be funded out general reserves and that the Parkland Reserve is already a dwindling reserve. With respect to budget overages, Comments from Council included:  discretionary items for roads budget - staff make good decisions and while latitude is appreciated it shouldn’t lead to deficits, this is why we have the multi year capital road plan  the two emergency road closure trailers were not approved by Council in the budget.  center lines on secondary roads should be prioritized through the five year plan  It is important for the winter control reserve to reflect the costs spent and what was saved to give true measure of winter control costs  line painting is more valuable than having three cuts on roadside mowing  if work done in 2015 was part of 2016 budget then adjustment should be reflected in the 2016 budget. Staff were directed to come back with recommendations to address the overspending in the 2015 budget.

e)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Standardization of Recreation Committee Secretaries Payments The consensus was to bring this item forward for Council approval.

Page 2 of 4

Page 71 of 154 Committee of the Whole March 8, 2016 f)

Mayor Vandewal, re: Verbal Update on large scale solar projects. The consensus from Council was that Council was willing to individually assess each application for large scale solar projects on it’s own merits.

Reports for Information

a)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: 2015 Statement of Remuneration and Expenses Paid to Council Members An error was noted in the calculation of the Mayor’s remuneration and expenses. The total should be $31,432.61.

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner , re: Review of Application for a Zoning By-law Amendment to Expand a Quarry in Part of Lot 17, Concession VI, Portland District This item will be brought forward for approval.

Rise & Report

a)

Councillor Revill provided an update on Councillor Robinson who is now at St. Mary’s convalescing, he looked well and wished to reassure Council and his constituents that he still has their best interest at heart.

b)

County Council     

c)

Arena Board    

d)

The Willowbrook and Johnson Point developments should be on the March 16 agenda. A Community Improvement Plan (CIP) meeting is scheduled for next month. The County’s Official Plan is now online. The County is still pursuing the Bellrock Road and Road 38 property. The CFDC funding application includes rural Kingston.

The compressors will be replaced after the ice is taken out. The spectator heating campaign will likely surpass their campaign projections. The lights over the ice pad area will be changed to LED. The Arena Board will be approaching Council for temporary funding.

Police Services Board 

The next meeting will be March 17, 2016.

Information Items

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Utilities Kingston reporting on Sydenham Water This will be referred to Public Services for review and discussion.

b)

Hanne and Dennis Saunders, 4034 Boyce Rd, Hartington, re: Proposed

Page 3 of 4

Page 72 of 154 Committee of the Whole March 8, 2016 Hartington Subdivision c)

Helen Bartsch on behalf of Concerned Citizens Group, re: Condominium Developments

d)

Michelle Foxton, Charlie Labarge, Wade Leonard and John Lesperance, re: Proposed Hartington Subdivision: March 1, 2016 Council Agenda Item # 8f

e)

Meela Melnik-Proud & Matt Rennie, re; Applewood Condominium - Letter of Concern

f)

Honourable Mario Sergio, Minister Responsible for Seniors Affairs, re: 2016 Senior of the Year Award Deputy Mayor Sutherland was supportive of nominating an individual for this award.

g)

Chris West, Save Via/Save the Train

h)

Leeds and Thousand Island Township - Teeny Tiny Summit 2016 - March 30, 2016 The CAO, Councillor’s Barr and McDougall plan on attending.

Notice of Motions

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland asked if a response has been received from the Ministry with regard to the classification of Class 1 Agricultural lands.

Announcements

a)

Councillor Sleeth noted there will be a bus tour of agricultural businesses organized by the Frontenac Federation of Agriculture in April. County staff and Council members will be invited to attend when the date is confirmed.

b)

Councillor Sleeth asked when the draft Organizational Review will be completed. Wayne Orr confirmed that the consultant will present the draft at the April 12 Committee of the Whole meeting.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items) - n/a

Closed Session-n/a

Adjournment

a)

The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.

Page 4 of 4

Page 73 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 Time: 6:00 PM Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 8 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-8-1 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT the Council meeting of March 5, 2016 be called to order at 6:00 p.m. Carried

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

a)

Councillor Roberts declared a pecuniary interest with respect to Item 8 (a) Page 1. Councillor Sleeth declared a pecuniary interest with respect to Items 5 (b) and 10 (a) as an abutting landowner. Mayor Vandewal declared a pecuniary interest with respect to labour relations in closed session.

Scheduled Closed Session

a)

Move into Closed Session to adopt prior closed minutes, discuss matters about an identifiable individual, property matters and labour relations Resolution No. 2016-8-2 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT the Council meeting of March 15, 2016 move into closed session to adopt prior closed minutes, discuss matters about an identifiable individual, property matters and labour relations. Carried

***Recess - reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for Open Session

Public Meeting

a)

Open Public Meeting - Resolution Resolution No. 2016-8-6 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT a public meeting be held to discuss planning matters related to:  Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 15, Concession IX, Storrington District: Campbell

Page 74 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016   

b)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 5, Concession III, Loughborough District: Snider Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 24, Concession XI, Bedford District: Lamoureux Township Initiated Housekeeping Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Carried

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 15, Concession IX, Storrington District: Campbell Lindsay Mills explained that the rezoning is for a proposed new 2.7 acre residential lot from rural to a special waterfront residential zone to recognize that it would have less than the normally required water frontage. Both the new lot and the retained lot are undeveloped and both would have frontage on Wellington Street which is a fully maintained public road. This proposal appears to meet the intent of the Official Plan in terms of use, minimum size and location on a public road. The purposes already exists, given that there is a separate gap at the waterfront and given that the proposed water frontage is very close to the normal minimum requirement. Mayor Vandewal questioned the small open space indicated on the second attachment of the report. There were no other comments from Council or the public.

c)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 5, Concession III, Loughborough District: Snider Lindsay Mills explained that this application is to rezone a proposed new 5.56 acre lot from Rural to a Special Rural Industrial zone to recognize that it would be used as a bulk storage yard including equipment storage and equipment repair, welding and accessory uses. The new lot would have frontage on Lambert Road, a fully maintained public road. The UI zoning requires a buffer strip along the north side of Lambert Road that will visually protect by way of a continuous hedgegrow of trees, evergreens or shrubs. A site plan agreement will also be required to ensure a properly constructed entrance, proper access aisles and manoeuvring areas and significant buffering from the abutting residential uses to the west and north. The “H” symbol will be removed once the site plan agreement is in place. Deputy Mayor Sutherland asked if the driveway could be located to the east along the boundary line. Mr. Mills responded that this could be part of the site plan. Kate Kristiansen, 2747 Lambert Road, asked why Mr. Snider was being asked to move from his current location. She questioned the ongoing maintenance of the property and being mindful of the use of space going forward. She wondered if the building could be required to be located at the back of the lot. She indicated that Mr. Snider was a good neighbour and she wanted to continue to be a good neighbour to him. Wayne Orr stated that Mr. Snider is currently on a township leased property and that the lease expires in April 2017. The township does have plans for the potential use of the property. Mr. Mills noted that the concerns from Ms. Kristiansen would be addressed in the site plan agreement. There were no other comments from the public.

Page 2 of 9

Page 75 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 d)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 24, Concession XI, Bedford District: Lamoureux Mr. Mills explained that the rezoning application is for two proposed new residential lots at Wolfe Lake from Rural to Limited Service Residential. Both new lots would have frontage on Harding Lane while the retained portion has frontage on Lee Road. The two new lots would both be approximately 5.4 acres in size with 300 feet of water frontage and 250 feet of frontage on Harding Lane. Mr. Don Stricelj asked for confirmation on the water frontage for the proposed lots. There were no comments from Council.

e)

Township Initiated Housekeeping Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Mr. Mills reviewed his report that included eleven amendments that would help correct the by-law along with an explanation and rationale for the changes. He circulated pictures to Council that demonstrated that dilapidated structures should be rebuilt further back from the water. He read correspondence received from Graeme Watson and Jeff Peck that outlined their concerns about the housekeeping amendment. Mayor Vandewal referred to the Committee of Adjustment and that 6-8 people reviewing an application provides a more subjective view than just one person.He stated that if people are up front, the committee bends over backwards to help with the process. He agreed with the setbacks and felt that if the lot supports it, then structures when rebuilt, should be setback further from the water. Don Stricelj felt this amendment was directed at him and that landowners rights are diminishing. He suggested there are issues with the minor variance process and that it is an unfair process with predetermined decisions. He felt it was not good timing for this amendment and there should be an open process to include seasonal residents. Mr. Stricelj referred to his own property and felt the structure was grandfathered and it was not his intent to break any by-laws and that the CRCA had given him approval as there was no impact to the environment. He reiterated his support for public debate on the proposed changes. Jennifer Garrah, Fotenn Consulting, felt the proposed housekeeping by-law was not addressing clarification and to fix minor errors or omissions, but that it included new language and direction that was not the original intent of the bylaw . She felt 5.10.2 was new language and are not technical in nature. She felt these changes would have significant impact on residents and there should be more consultation. The removal of walls needs clarification as to the number of walls or does it include “down to the studs”. She felt this by-law should not be used to legitimize how staff have interpreted this section. Resolution No. 2016-8-7 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT an opportunity having been provided, the public meeting be closed. Carried

Approval of Minutes

Page 3 of 9

Page 76 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 a)

March 1, 2016 Council Meeting Deputy Mayor Sutherland requested the March 1, 2016 minutes of the public meeting be amended. Resolution No. 2016-8-8 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT the March 1 Public Meeting minutes be amended to indicate “That Mr. Bannon would be supportive of holding a meeting with residents within 3- 4 months of the opening of the group home.” Defeated Resolution No. 2016-8-9 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approves the minutes of the March 1, 2016 Council meeting. Carried

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Electric Vehicle Proposal Resolution No. 2016-8-10 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT the motion be amended to replace “on how best to integrate” with “and have staff examine the merits of”. Carried Resolution No. 2016-8-11 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council support the resolution attached to this report regarding the exploration of options on how best to integrate an electric vehicle into the township fleet as amended. Carried

b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: 2015 Deficit Recommendations Councillor Schjerning proposed an amendment to the resolution. Resolution No. 2016-8-12 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT the motion be amended by adding: AND THAT the CAO take the steps necessary to ensure that budget overages do not occur, and THAT when a budget overage is anticipated that a report be brought forward to Council for authorization and consideration and,

Page 4 of 9

Page 77 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 THAT when a non-budgeted item is required that a report be brought forward to Council or consideration and authorization. Carried Resolution No. 2016-8-13 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council authorize the implementation of the staff recommendations to address the 2015 budget deficit and to adjust the 2016 budget and reserves accordingly as amended. Carried c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Sydenham Village Parking and Traffic Restrictions

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing Resolution No. 2016-8-14 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council receives for information the Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing dated March 15, 2016 in the amount of $1,948,819.31. Carried

b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Arena Board Loan Resolution No. 2016-8-15 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council support the Township extending a loan to the Arena Board to an upset limit of $190,497.12 with investments being held as security and further authorize the CAO and Mayor to execute the promissory note. Carried

c)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Review of Application for a Zoning By-law Amendment to Expand a Quarry in Part of Lot 17, Concession VI -Portland See By-law 2019-21

d)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Local Road Side Mowing Resolution No. 2016-8-16 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council extends the contract for Percy Snider for local road side mowing for 2016 at $26,426.35 per cut. Carried

e)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager,re: Anderson Road Emergency Construction Resolution No. 2016-8-17

Page 5 of 9

Page 78 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT an amount of up to $50,000.00 be approved from the Working Fund Reserve for the emergency reconstruction of Anderson Road. Carried 9.

Committee Meeting Minutes - n/a

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-08 - Campbell Rezoning, Concession IX, Part Lot 15 Resolution No. 2016-8-18 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT the following by-laws be given first and second reading:  By-law 2016-08  By-law 2016-09  By-law 2016-10  By-law 2016-18  By-law 2016-19  By-law 2016-20  By-law 2016-21 Carried Resolution No. 2016-8-19 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-08, being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended to rezone land from Rural (RU) to Special Waterfront Residential (RW-37), Part Lot 15, Concession IX, District of Storrington, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

b)

By-law 2016-09 - Snider Rezoning, Concession III, Part Lot 5 Resolution No. 2016-8-20 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT By-law 2016-09. being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended, to rezone land from Rural (RU) Zone to Special Rural Industrial (RI-10-H) , Part Lot 5, Concession III, Loughborough District, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

c)

By-law 2016-10 - Lamoureux Rezoning, Concession XI, Part Lot 24 Resolution No. 2016-8-21 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-10, being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended to rezone lands from Rural (RU) to Limited Service Residential- Waterfront, Part Lot 24, Concession XI, District of Bedford, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

Page 6 of 9

Page 79 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 d)

By-law 2016-18 Restricted Parking for Sydenham Resolution No. 2016-8-22 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT By-law 2016-18, being a by-law to amend By-law 2000-01 as amended, to regulate the use of traffic, parking and stopping on highways and bridges in the Township of South Frontenac, to create no parking and parking restrictions in the village of Sydenham, be given third reading signed and sealed.

e)

By-law 2016-19 - Through Highways (Sydenham Cross St) Resolution No. 2016-8-23 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-19, being a by-law to amend By-law 2000-01, being a by-law to regulate the use of traffic parking and stopping on highways and bridges in the Township of south Frontenac, to create no parking and parking restrictions in the Village of Sydenham, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

f)

By-law 2016-20 - Housekeeping By-law Amendments to the motion were proposed. Resolution No. 2016-8-24 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT Items 6 and 7 be removed from the by-law and deferred for further discussion and meetings.

Resolution No. 2016-8-25 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT this matter be deferred for two months. Carried Resolution No. 2016-8-26 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-20, being a township initiated housekeeping by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended, to effect a number of changes to correct mapping errors that have been identified and to clarify the wording of parts of the text be given third reading, signed and sealed as amended.

g)

By-law 2016-21- Jackson Quarry Rezoning Resolution No. 2016-8-27 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts

Page 7 of 9

Page 80 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 THAT By-law 2016-21, being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended, to rezone land from Quarry “A” and Rural (RU) to Special Quarry “A:” (QA-3) Zone, Part Lot 17, Concession VI, District of Portland, be given third reading, signed and sealed with the following changes:  Remove the fifth bullet under “Permitted Uses - Blasting”  Remove Clause 2. Carried 11.

Reports for Information

a)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: LRP 1 Projects awarded by IESO

b)

Councillor Revill, re: Ontario On-site Waste Water Conference

Information Items

a)

Art Booth, Operations Manager, Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, re: Compliance with Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act

b)

Derek Matheson, RVCA, re: Rural Clean Water Program

c)

Sheri Vivian - copy of presentation and petition from March 8, 2016 meting Councillor Sleeth questioned the status of this request to reconsider the by-law. Wayne Orr confirmed that this item will be discussed at the Corporate Services meeting on March 18.

d)

Joanna Stricker, re: 10 Hickory Lane Rezoning

e)

Jannette Amini, County of Frontenac, re: Request for Proclamation Accessibility Awareness Week Resolution No. 2016-8-28 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT Council support and proclaim the week of April 3- 9, 2016 as Accessibility Awareness Week. Carried

f)

Ontario News Release - 2014 Air Quality Report

Notice of Motions

a) Deputy Mayor Sutherland suggested that public meetings and the passing of by-laws should be dealt with at separate meetings. This would allow the township planner to review and ensure all concerns are addressed. There was no support from Council to have staff change this process. 14.

Announcements

a)

Councillor McDougall provided an update on Councillor Robinson and his progress with therapy.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items) - n/a

Closed Session - n/a

Page 8 of 9

Page 81 of 154 Minutes of Council March, 15, 2016 17.

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-22 Resolution No. 2016-8-29 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT By-law 2016-22, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading this 15, day of March, 2016. Carried Resolution No. 2016-8-30 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-22, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading signed and sealed this 15, day of March, 2016. Carried

Adjournment

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-8-31 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT the Council meeting of March 15, 2016 be adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Carried

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Page 9 of 9

Page 82 of 154

Minutes of Committee of the Whole March 22, 2016 Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 9 Present: Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

a)

Mayor Vandewal called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof - n/a

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

a)

Warden Frances Smith and Kelly Pender, CAO, County of Frontenac Warden Frances Smith thanked Council for the opportunity to provide an update on the County. Kelly Pender, CAO, reviewed various topics including the budget, Eastern Ontario Warden’s Caucus, paramedic services, planing and economic development, Fairmount Home and shared services.

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Campbell - Proposal to Purchase a Portion of Unopened Road Allowance at reduced costs Council directed staff to advertise the orphaned piece of road allowance and include abutting property owners. If there is no interest from them, then Mr. Campbell will be asked to provide an offer to purchase.

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Conveyance of Closed Road Allowance between Lots 24 and 25, Concession VII, Storrington District- Gordon Council was supportive of this request.

c)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Recreation Facility User Fees Council directed staff to proceed with an evaluation of the current user fees and to develop recommendations on a new program to address the challenges and meet the needs of the community.

d)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Source Water Appointment Council was supportive of the recommendation to have Greg Newman and John Conley’s names put forward for appointment to the Cataraqui Source

Page 83 of 154 Committee of the Whole March 22, 2016 Protection Committee. 7.

Reports for Information - n/a

Rise & Report

a)

Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority Work is being done on a three year work plan and they are looking for input. Items to look at include the role of the authority in planning decisions and improving environmental reviews.

b)

Quinte Region Conservation Authority No report.

c)

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority The last meeting was cancelled due to bad weather. RVCA will be celebrating their 50th anniversary. The next meeting is scheduled for a week form Thursday when they will be finalizing their budget.

d)

Portland Heritage They will be discussing their hours of operation at the meeting on Thursday and details of their new displays.

Information Items

a)

2016 Ontario Farmland Forum Flyer Councillor Sleeth indicated his interest in attending this forum on April 8.

b)

Wilma Kenny, re: Sydenham Parking

c)

Stephen Kapusta, re: Sydenham Parking

d)

Graeme Watson, re: Township Initiated Housekeeping By-law

e)

Jeff Peck, re: Township Initiated Housekeeping By-law Council questioned the next steps regarding the deferral of Sections 5.10 and 5.11. It was agreed that this item is significant enough to have a written legal opinion.

f)

Ontario News Release - Ontario Transforming Housing and Homelessness System

g)

Councillor Revill, re: March 1 comments on Hartington Subdivision

h)

Harrowsmith Community Improvement Plan Poster

i)

Ontario Association of Fire Chief’s Conference

Page 2 of 3

Page 84 of 154 Committee of the Whole March 22, 2016

Notice of Motions

a)

Councillor Schjerning served notice of motion that he will be tabling a resolution to support local businesses at the April 5, 2016 meeting.

Announcements

a)

Mayor Vandewal reminded Council of the invitation from Richard Allen to attend the Rural Business Tour.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

a)

Jamie Curragh questioned the timeframe for public input on Zoning By-law Sections 5.10 and 5.11 and when the legal opinion would be obtained. He felt this was a very short timeframe for cottagers as they typically don’t go to their cottage until the May long weekend. Mayor Vandewal responded that information will be circulated through various lake associations and that people will be to attend or provide their written feedback.

Closed Session - n/a

Adjournment

a)

The meeting adjourned at 8:35 pm.

Page 3 of 3

Page 85 of 154

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Committee of the Whole

Planning Department

Agenda Date: March 23, 2016 Date of Report: April 5, 2016 Subject: Conveyance of Closed Road Allowance Between Lots 24 & 25, Concession VII, District of Storrington, Township of South Frontenac: Gordon

Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council authorize the conveying of a closed road allowance to the abutting land-owner. Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to provide the background information necessary to enable Council to authorize the conveying of a closed road allowance in the District of Storrington. Background: On March 22 the Committee of the Whole received a full report and expressed its support to proceed with conveying a closed road allowance to an abutting land owner. The Planning Department received a letter from a lawyer representing the owner of a property at Holmes Road and Perth Road (described as Part 1, Plan 13R7226) requesting that Council authorize the transfer/conveyance of the Township’s interest in that portion of a road allowance that bisect the subject land ie., lying between Lots 24 and 25, Concession VII in Storrington. The letter explains that the road allowance was closed by By-law 1968-9 on March 4, 1968 but the intended transfer of ownership never occurred. Discussion: It was clear that By-law 1968-9 was to close the road allowance and transfer ownership to the Gordons. It seems that the land was inadvertently not transferred. Thus, the conveyance seems only to be a minor technicality that should be resolved as simply as possible. The letter requests that, to avoid the costs of surveying the road allowance itself, Council simply quitclaim any interest in lands described as Part 1 on Plan 13R7226 (which is the whole of the Gordon’s lands). Recommendation: That Council authorize the Mayor and CAO to quitclaim any interest in the closed road allowance between lots 24 and 25 Concession VII Storrington District and described within Part 1 on Plan 13R7226.

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills,

Page 86 of 154

STAFF REPORT RECREATION DEPARTMENT Prepared for Council:

March 21, 2016

Agenda Date:

April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Standardization of Recreation Committee Secretaries Payments RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve all 5 recreation recording secretaries be paid a single all-inclusive honorarium of $65 per meeting, retroactive to January 1, 2016. BACKGROUND: On March 8, 2016 at the Committee of the Whole meeting Council received a staff report providing information about the Recreation Committee Members and Secretaries honorariums and payments program. This was presented so that Council could make a decision on creating a standardized and equitable payment program for all recording secretaries. Recognizing the variety of comments from Councillors and acknowledging the general direction of Council to address this issue, staff are bringing this item forward for decision. On March 3, 2015, Council adopted resolution # 2015-8-5 to ‘increase the recreation committee member’s honorarium for attendance at meetings from $25.00 to $30.00 effective January 1, 2015.’ AND THAT ‘this rate be adjusted on a regular basis at the same increment as negotiated for the Township’s bargaining unit commencing January 1, 2016.’ On February 29, 2016, the South Frontenac Recreation Committee made the following recommendation. Motion: THAT the South Frontenac Recreation Committee recommends all recording secretaries from all districts be paid at a rate of $65 per meeting, retroactive to January 1, 2016. Moved by: Councillor Norm Roberts Seconded by: Kevin Fox Carried Current Rates: Committee Members: • All committee members including recording secretaries are paid as per resolution # 2015-8-5 • All members including recording secretaries are paid for their mileage to attend the South Frontenac Recreation Committee meetings. Recording Secretaries Current remuneration: • South Frontenac Recreation Committee: $35.00 • Loughborough District Recreation Committee: $35.00 • Storrington District Recreation Committee: $20.00 • Bedford District Recreation Committee: No payment provided • Portland District Recreation Committee: No payment provided Note: The process for recording and reporting minutes is not standardized and differs from each District Recreation Committee. The new process established and agreed on by the Recreation Committees is as follows.

Page 87 of 154

•

•

As soon as reasonably possible the Secretary of each committee will send the minutes/motions to both the Townships Executive Assistant (for circulating to Council) and to the Arena and Recreation Supervisor (for action). A template has been provided to ensure consistency. To ensure ‘timely’ and ‘accurate’ payment of honorariums, mileage and Secretary remuneration. Each committee will complete an attendance form during the meeting and forward it to the Arena and Recreation Supervisor who will approve and arrange payment through the Treasury Department.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Wayne Orr CAO

Tim Laprade Arena/Recreation Supervisor

Page 88 of 154

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COW:

March 23, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Joint Appointment to Cataraqui Source Protection Committee RECOMMENDATIONS: That the nomination of Greg Newman to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Source Protection Committee representing the Central Area, be supported; and That John Conley, the incumbent member, serving as the Municipal representative at-large, Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Source Protection Committee be supported. BACKGROUND: Council was briefed on this issue at the Committee of the Whole meeting on March 22, 2016 and supported the recommendation moving forward for adoption. Staff received correspondence from the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority advising the Township that it was restructuring the composition of the Source Water Protection Committee to reflect the lighter workload that is anticipated. In keeping with the legislative framework for the committee and the initial planning in 2007 the new committee would have a joint representative for the “central” nomination area. The central area is composed of Frontenac Islands the City of Kingston and South Frontenac. In addition to an East West and Central municipal appointees there is a requirement for confirmation of a Municipal Appointee at large. The Authority has indicated that Mr Conley, former Mayor of the Township of Athens and member of the committee since 2007, has indicated a willingness to serve in this role. The three Municipal CAOs / Clerks were asked to discuss the process and bring forward to their Council’s resolutions for support. Frontenac Islands and South Frontenac do not have the staffing resources to appoint a staff member. The City of Kingston previously had appointed Kevin Riley from Utilities Kingston as their representative. The City has proposed to appoint Greg Newman, Manager of Policy Planning. South Frontenac staff are supportive of this appointment as well as affirming support for Mr Conley. This City’s approved a staff recommendation regarding this appointment on March 22.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 89 of 154

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT

PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

March 23, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Supporting Local Businesses RECOMMENDATION: To be tabled at meeting BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-Law 2007-83 establishes the process for Notice of Motion as outlined below. At the March 22, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting Councillor Schjerning served Notice of Motion that he would be tabling a motion on Supporting Local Businesses. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and then voted upon.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 90 of 154

Payment Listing For the period of March 16, 2016 to April 5, 2016

Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of March 16, 2016 to April 5, 2016

1,943,654.51

Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #6

Pay date March 16, 2016 For the period of February 28, 2016 to March 12, 2016

Council Reimbursement

Pay date March 16, 2016

Pay Period # 7

Pay date March 30, 2016

74,200.86 4,589.15

For the period of March 13, 2016 to March 26, 2016 Council Honorarium

Pay date March 31, 20156

Total Payments

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending April 5, 2016 in the amount of

$

2,107,797.66

Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer

74,534.24 10,818.90

$

2,107,797.66

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

Ranges: Cheque Date:

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

11:12:16 AM

From: 3/16/2016

To: 4/5/2016

Page:

1

Page 91 of 154

Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC

10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000005202

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

02046493

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. FEBRUARY PEST CONTROL

60513 60541 60578

THE FRONTENAC NEWS MARCH 16TH ADVERTISING MAR 24TH ADVERTISING MAR 31ST ADVERTISING

3761461

METROLAND MEDIA GROUP FEBRUARY ADVERTISING

IN-54743-01 IN-54489-01

ZYCOM TECHNOLOGY INC. BARRACUDA MCAFEE GOLD SUPPORT

Total EFT000000005202 EFT000000005225 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005225 EFT000000005246 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005246 EFT000000005279 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005279

Total Gen

Amount $161.55 $161.55 $640.88 $649.05 $589.30 $1,879.23 $1,414.46 $1,414.46 $6,430.21 $769.31 $7,199.52

$10,654.76

0010 TaxM Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

Amount

Total 067367

$123.33 $123.33

Total TaxM

$123.33

2015 REBATE

0020 TaxC Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 2015 REBATE

Total 067367 EFT000000005214

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000045732 1ST QUARTER LEVY BILLING

Total EFT000000005214

Total TaxC

Amount $39.80 $39.80 $1,250,487.75 $1,250,487.75

$1,250,527.55

0035 TaxSB-EP Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 2015 REBATE

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

Total 067367

Total TaxSB-EP

Amount $242.25 $242.25

$242.25

0036 TaxSB-ES Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 2015 REBATE

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

Total 067367

Total TaxSB-ES

Amount $88.27 $88.27

$88.27

0037 TaxSB-FP Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 2015 REBATE

Total 067367

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

Amount $4.70 $4.70

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total TaxSB-FP

Page:

2

Page 92 of 154 $4.70

0038 TaxSB-FS Cheque 067367

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

PATHWAYS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH 2015 CHARITABLE REBATE

Amount

Total 067367

$6.42 $6.42

Total TaxSB-FS

$6.42

2015 REBATE

1000 Cheque 067353

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 034349

Total 067353 067370

4/5/2016

Vendor

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE WATER SOFTENER SALT

Amount $26.53 $26.53

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/11-04 16/03/02-05 16/02/20-32 16/01/16-48

Total 067370 EFT000000005263

Description

4/5/2016 4149

12 HRS @ $70 6 HRS @ $70 4 HRS @ $70 2 PLOW/SAND @ $70 SIMMONS PLUMBING & PUMP SERV. REPAIR TOILET CELL #2

Total EFT000000005263

Total

$854.78 $427.39 $284.93 $142.46 $1,709.56 $578.00 $578.00

$2,314.09

1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000005214

Date 4/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000045729 MARCH EAP

Total EFT000000005214 EFT000000005243 4/5/2016 34716

MARCHANT MARKING DEVICES LTD. COMMISSIONER STAMP

423 3734 9939 9072 3423 1643 3815

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND CREAM CREAM COFFEE, CREAM CREAM CREAM COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR TWIN COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR

Total EFT000000005243 EFT000000005268 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005268

Total Clk

Amount $251.55 $251.55 $53.87 $53.87 $8.07 $4.39 $34.05 $8.07 $8.07 $32.16 $18.97 $113.78

$419.20

1275 Fin Cheque EFT000000005207

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

19843

BAYRIDGE PRINTER PROS PRINTER REPAIRS

D23875

DIAMOND MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS INC. GENERAL CONSULTING

41074

INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES TELEPHONE PROGRAMMING

Total EFT000000005207 EFT000000005218 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005218 EFT000000005231 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005231

Amount $91.58 $91.58 $193.34 $193.34 $45.79 $45.79

Total Fin

$330.71

Total GG

$1,264,711.28

20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067350

Date 3/29/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

BBD&E FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION

Amount

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 2016 RESCUE CHALL

Total 067350 067354 Total 067354 067362 Total 067362 067368

Total 067368 067370

Total 067370 067372

Total 067372 EFT000000005202

4/5/2016 9582

BILL CHAPMAN’S PUMP SHOP 1 POWER CORD

RONA-16/03/22

LAVALLEE & SONS CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

20160041906 20160041292

RECEIVER GENERAL RADIO LICENCES RADIO LICENCES RADIO LICENCES

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

2016 RESCUE CHALLENGE

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/29-03 16/02/17-13 2015 FIREHALL MOWING 2015 FIREHALL MOWING 2015 FIREHALL MOWING 2015 FIREHALL MOWING

10 PLOWS @ $65 7 PLOWS @ $65 19 MOWS @ $45, 3 MOWS @ $75 23 MOWS @ $35 21 MOWS @ $35 21 MOWS @ $25

TOWNSHIP OF RIDEAU LAKES 2015 STANDBY/M AID 2015 STANDBY 2015 STANDBY/M AID 2015 MUTUAL AID

4/5/2016 03511250 03678521

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. MARCH PEST CONTROL MARCHH PEST CONTROL

2523

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE WATER SOFTENER SALT

0907156

DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY LED WALLPACK

Total EFT000000005202 EFT000000005204 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005204 EFT000000005216 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005216 EFT000000005219 4/5/2016

Page:

3

Page 93 of 154 $450.00 $450.00 $117.02 $117.02 $94.41 $94.41 $2,305.00 $82.00 $2,387.00 $661.44 $463.01 $1,099.01 $819.17 $747.94 $534.24 $4,324.81 $1,000.00 $5,400.00 $6,400.00 $42.60 $40.70 $83.30 $81.31 $81.31 $356.35 $356.35

DRAPER DOORS 9165

Total EFT000000005219 EFT000000005222 4/5/2016 433380 Total EFT000000005222 EFT000000005242 4/5/2016

GARAGE DOOR REPAIR FIRE SERVICE MANAGEMENT BUNKER GEAR MAINTENANCE

$274.75 $274.75 $317.25 $317.25

LONDRY ALARMS 183730

Total EFT000000005242 EFT000000005249 4/5/2016 33654 Total EFT000000005249 EFT000000005255 4/5/2016

ALARM SERVICE CALL NELLIE’S GAS BAR 72L DIESEL

$122.11 $122.11 $64.83 $64.83

PRINCESS AUTO 27-1-130267

Total EFT000000005255 EFT000000005258 4/5/2016

TARPS

$81.34 $81.34

COURIER

$29.05 $29.05

PUROLATOR INC. 430618740

Total EFT000000005258 EFT000000005267 4/5/2016 32267

TRIM-LINE OF SOUTH EAST FIRE VEHICLE NUMBERS

TCL-1507660 TCL-1507501 TCL-1507475

TURRIS COMMUNICATIONS LTD PAGER REPAIRS REPROGRAM RADIO RADIO REPAIRS

Total EFT000000005267 EFT000000005271 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005271

Total Fire

$803.90 $803.90 $50.88 $45.79 $54.89 $151.56

$16,138.99

2110 Cvc# Cheque EFT000000005262

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Description

Amount

SIGNS PLUS 2927

Total EFT000000005262

Vendor

CIVIC NUMBER SIGN

$9.16 $9.16

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Cvc#

Page:

4

Page 94 of 154 $9.16

2400 Police Cheque 067364

Total 067364 EFT000000005246

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

17100316064 17210316034

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES MARCH POLICE SERVICES 16/03/13 - RIDE PROGRAM

3761461

METROLAND MEDIA GROUP FEBRUARY ADVERTISING

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005246

Total Police

Amount $244,876.00 $815.44 $245,691.44 $366.74 $366.74

$246,058.18

2410 Ride Program Cheque 067364

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 17090316019

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES 16/03/02 - RIDE PROGRAM

Total 067364

Total Ride Program

Amount $1,237.47 $1,237.47

$1,237.47

2605 Build Cheque EFT000000005201

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

802448

4 OFFICE AUTOMATION LTD 03/01/16-05/31/16

5243 BALANCE

INGENIOUS SOFTWARE BALANCE OF INVOICE

Total EFT000000005201 EFT000000005232 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005232

Total Build

Amount $429.34 $429.34 $554.08 $554.08

$983.42

2620 Anml Ctl Cheque EFT000000005224

Date 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005224 EFT000000005237 4/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-AC-2016-FEBRUARY FEB ANIMAL CONTROL KINGSTON HUMANE SOCIETY SF-KHS-POUND-16-02 ANIMAL AT LARGE FEE SF-KHS-POUND-16-02 BOARDING FEE SF-KHS-POUND-16-02 TAGS 704, 705 SF-KHS-POUND-16-02 2 TAGS @ $8.00 SF-KHS-POUND-16-02 ADMIN & BOARDING FEES

Total EFT000000005237

Total Anml Ctl

Amount $3,256.19 $3,256.19 -$150.00 -$25.00 -$30.00 $16.00 $200.00 $11.00

$3,267.19

2625 Lvstck Cheque EFT000000005259

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

REDDEN, JOSEPH 0014 0014

16/03/18-JERRY NOBLES CALF 72 KMS @ $.55

Total EFT000000005259

Total Lvstck

$50.00 $35.67 $85.67

$85.67

2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005224

Date 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005224

Total Bylaw enf

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-P-2016-FEBRUARY 20 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2016-FEBRUARY 1200 KMS @ $.52 SF-B-2016-FEBRUARY 17 HRS @ $22.50 SF-B-2016-FEBRUARY 300 KMS @ $.52

Amount $457.92 $634.98 $389.23 $158.75 $1,640.88

$1,640.88

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total PP&P

Page:

5

Page 95 of 154 $269,420.96

30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067351 Total 067351 067378 Total 067378 EFT000000005203

Date 4/5/2016

4/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

Amount

407 ETR 832773875-15/12

TOLL CHARGES

$36.89 $36.89

FEELEY, ALLEN 2016-05 REFUND

2016-05 ENTRANCE REFUND

$75.00 $75.00

4/5/2016 38233867

AECOM CANADA LTD PERTH RD CORRIDOR JAN 9-FEB 5

06697

HARTINGTON EQUIPMENT LIMITED 2310-1993 FORD 555D DOZER

4707 2209 8881

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND VEG TRAY, DELI TRAY, BAKERY PLATES, FRUIT TRAY, SWEETS VEG TRAY, DELI TRAY, BAKERY

Total EFT000000005203 EFT000000005229 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005229 EFT000000005268 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005268

Total PW OH

$814.08 $814.08 -$14,246.40 -$14,246.40 $75.25 $131.63 $110.87 $317.75

-$13,002.68

3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067366

Total 067366 EFT000000005228

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

38743 38713 38711 38698

ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION ROADWAY MGMT-D MCEWEN TJ MAHONEY-N MOREY TJ MAHONEY-S MITCHELL TJ MAHONEY-D GIBSON

J456640 J456640 J362648

GRAND & TOY LIMITED 8GB USB DRIVE POST IT NOTES OFFICE SUPPLIES

76233

PRINTFUSION INC. BUSINESS CARDS

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005228 EFT000000005256 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005256

Total RdAdmOH

Amount $885.31 $885.31 $885.31 $885.31 $3,541.24 $19.25 $21.69 $138.26 $179.20 $46.81 $46.81

$3,767.25

3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067352

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Total 067353 067361 Total 067361 067363 Total 067363 067369

Total 067369

Description

Amount

A-1 LOCKSMITHS 511614

Total 067352 067353

Vendor

4/5/2016

LOCK REPAIR GARAGE DOOR

033084 031559 032823 032394

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE DRYWALL SUPPLIES RENO SUPPLIES DRYWALL SUPPLIES 2 - 120V LAMPS

2016083

KINGSTON TRANSMISSION SERVICES INC REPL LEAKING TRANS LINES

2016-007TOPO

MACDONALD & EBERHARDT SURVEYING LTD TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

503176 503190 502469 502534

REVELL FORD LINCOLN OIL CHANGE, VALVE ASSY OIL CHANGE/REPAIRS TOW CALL/REPAIRS PULL DENTS FROM PASS SIDE

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

$172.99 $172.99 $126.57 $63.62 $801.55 $7.71 $999.45 $415.36 $415.36 $2,035.20 $2,035.20 $131.26 $603.76 $2,157.55 $135.75 $3,028.32

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

067370

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

4/5/2016

Total 067371 EFT000000005202

4/5/2016

JAN, FEB GARBAGE PICKUP

GMCS597753 404312

TAYLOR AUTOMALL GASKET & SPARK PLUGS PUMP

03403110

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. MARCH PEST CONTROL

2423 2467

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE GROUND SPIKE MAILBOXES

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005202 EFT000000005204 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005204 EFT000000005206 4/5/2016

Page 96 of 154 $254.40 $254.40 $419.06 $286.36 $705.42 $61.11 $61.11 $10.67 $61.01 $71.68

BAY ELECTRIC 10680

Total EFT000000005206 EFT000000005212 4/5/2016

CONNECT BOILER

$1,240.88 $1,240.88

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS

$186.22 $13.29 $9.51 $116.51 $13.29 $9.51 $201.07 $123.32 $35.62 $71.42 $149.17 $116.51 $13.29 $9.51 $190.84 $13.29 $9.51 $1,281.88

CINTAS 884715788 884715788 884715788 884717467 884717467 884717467 884715774 884719144 884717474 884719147 884715775 884720811 884720811 884720811 884719135 884719135 884719135

Total EFT000000005212 EFT000000005217 4/5/2016 712 712 Total EFT000000005217 EFT000000005219 4/5/2016

DEDICATED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC VACUUM GREASE PITS VACUUM GREASE PITS

$1,019.13 $1,019.13 $2,038.26

DRAPER DOORS 9135 8922 8922 9153 9120

INSTALL RECEIVER GARAGE DOOR INSTALL 8 STEEL GARAGE DOORS GARAGE DOOR REPAIR INSTALL USED GARAGE DOOR INSTALLATION OF WINDOWS

36126

GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC FULL TRIP UPPER ARM ASSEMBLY

J476064 J456641 J501641

GRAND & TOY LIMITED OFFICE SUPPLIES CABLES CABLES

IV41829 06697 06697

HARTINGTON EQUIPMENT LIMITED HYDRAULIC FLUID 23106-580 CASE 4WD BULLDOZER 2106-4YR/5000HR EXT WARRANTY

230867B

HWB BRUCE SALES VEE BAR SINGLE CHAIN

41089

INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES RELOCATE DATA CABLES

P21602 P21602

JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC. WIRING WIRING

Total EFT000000005219 EFT000000005227 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005227 EFT000000005228 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005228 EFT000000005229 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005229 EFT000000005230 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005230 EFT000000005231 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005231 EFT000000005233 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005233

6

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/28-38

Total 067370 067371

Page:

$330.72 $24,422.40 $132.29 $669.07 $244.22 $25,798.70 $1,161.18 $1,161.18 $46.11 $234.45 $63.63 $344.19 $49.93 $132,116.41 $5,058.49 $137,224.83 $318.33 $318.33 $499.71 $499.71 $972.28 $972.28 $1,944.56

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005234

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

4/5/2016 847114753

KAL TIRE ONTARIO OIL CHANGE

9303910311

KENT AUTOMOTIVE PLOW BOLTS

KS15890

KENWORTH ONTARIO - KINGSTON FULL SERVICE & BRAKES

16-49

LEN CORCORAN EXCAVATING LTD. 2 HRS FLOATING @ $140

30586 30897

MCINTOSH PERRY CONSULTING CULVERT RE-LINING JAN 30 - FEB 26/16

203055

MCKEOWN AND WOOD FUELS 3021.6L @ $.6240

DA0005390779

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA REPLACE TIRE

0000128968

PAT’S RADIATOR SERVICE LTD. FUEL SYSTEM REPAIRS

Total EFT000000005234 EFT000000005235 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005235 EFT000000005236 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005236 EFT000000005241 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005241 EFT000000005244 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005244 EFT000000005245 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005245 EFT000000005247 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005247 EFT000000005253 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005253 EFT000000005254 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005254 EFT000000005255 4/5/2016

Page 97 of 154 $55.04 $55.04 $67.78 $67.78 $2,402.75 $2,402.75 $284.93 $284.93 $1,790.98 $3,301.28 $5,092.26 $1,918.66 $1,918.66 $882.26 $882.26 $404.50 $404.50

ENGINE OI, BRAKE FLUID ARMORAL CLEANER ENGINE OIL 5” CLAMP STROBE LIGHT

$227.01 $33.64 $49.09 $32.87 $65.83 $408.44

GARAGE SUPPLIES

$86.86 $86.86

PRINCESS AUTO 27-1-114577

PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000214703 1 LOAD CONSTRUCTION DEMO

Total EFT000000005257 EFT000000005260 4/5/2016 2433929 2433735 2433708

RIGNEY BUILDING SUPPLIES DRYWALL SUPPLIES RENO SUPPLIES DRYWALL SUPPLIES

4154

SIMMONS PLUMBING & PUMP SERV. PLUGGED SLOP SINK

428269 428129 428203 428247 428306 428302A

TALLMAN TRUCK CENTRE LIMITED AIR BRAKE REPAIRS ADJUST BRAKES/SERVICE BROKEN REAR BRAKE CHAMBER LEAKING MAXI QUICK LUBE, ADJ BRAKES & CLUTC ADJUST BRAKES

57637 57641 57476

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE GARAGE SUPPLIES GARAGE SUPPLIES RUBBER HOSE

Total EFT000000005260 EFT000000005263 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005263 EFT000000005265 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005265 EFT000000005269 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005269 EFT000000005270 4/5/2016

$577.13 $577.13 $322.72 $66.14 $960.15 $1,349.01 $165.87 $165.87 $1,510.45 $1,875.65 $1,385.45 $301.27 $528.95 $68.69 $5,670.46 $92.61 $43.69 $48.83 $185.13

TRUE ELECTRIC 6688 6689

Total EFT000000005270 EFT000000005273 4/5/2016 173-110104 173-110503 173-109369 Total EFT000000005273 EFT000000005276 4/5/2016

7

PETRIE FORD 209057 208989 209290 209290 209291

Total EFT000000005255 EFT000000005257 4/5/2016

Page:

CLEAN OUT OLD PAINT BOOTH ELECTRICAL WORK UNIVERSAL SUPPLY GROUP WIRING FUSES PIPE BUSHINGS VERONA HARDWARE LIMITED

$2,473.52 $4,226.94 $6,700.46 $31.55 $14.45 $49.86 $95.86

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

8

Page 98 of 154

Total EFT000000005276

$44.36 $44.36

Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl

$205,988.21

33608

DUCTS & SHOVEL

3210 Brushing Cheque 067358

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Amount

GIDDY, RYAN 16/03/08

Total 067358 EFT000000005205

Description

4/5/2016

REMOVE TREE/CHIP BRUSH

24192752

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS BRUSHING SUPPLIES

30380

L.D. POWER SPORTS 2 SPARK PLUGS FOR POLE SAW

16-50 16-48

LEN CORCORAN EXCAVATING LTD. FLOAT BRUSH CUTTER FLOAT BRUSH CUTTER

Total EFT000000005205 EFT000000005240 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005240 EFT000000005241 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005241

Total Brushing

$1,424.64 $1,424.64 $393.33 $393.33 $14.84 $14.84 $427.39 $427.39 $854.78

$2,687.59

3310 Hardtop Patching Cheque EFT000000005200

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 21969 21969

Total EFT000000005200 EFT000000005266 4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 2 HRS @ $65 22 HRS @ $65

Amount $132.29 $1,455.17 $1,587.46

TEM ROADWORK 599216 599216

15 HRS @ $85 9.5 HRS @ $85

Total EFT000000005266

Total Hardtop Patching

$1,297.44 $821.71 $2,119.15

$3,706.61

3505 Snw Plwng Cheque 067356

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

PLOW/SAND PLOW SAND PLOW/SAND PLOW/SAND, CLEAN UP ROAD

$250.00 $2,250.00 $2,800.00 $500.00 $5,800.00

8 PLOWS @ $210 PLOW RUTLEDGE TO BOUNDARY 3 PLOW/SAND @ $210 3 PLOWS @ $70 3 PLOWS @ $70 11 PLOW/SAND @ $785 4 PLOWS @ $70 2 HRS @ $70 1 HR @ $68 2.5 HRS @ $68 4 HRS @ $68 1 HR @ $68 1 HR @ $68 2 HRS @ $68 3 HRS @ $68 1 HR @ $68 3 PLOWS @ $210 9 PLOWS @ $210 2 PLOW/SAND @ $210 4 HRS @ $68 9.5 HRS @ $68 13.5 HRS @ $68 4.5 HRS @ $68

$1,709.57 $236.59 $641.09 $213.70 $213.70 $8,786.98 $284.93 $142.46 $69.20 $172.99 $276.79 $69.20 $69.20 $138.39 $207.59 $69.20 $641.09 $1,923.26 $427.39 $276.79 $657.37 $934.16 $311.39 $18,473.03

SNIDER, PERCY 16/01/18-09 16/02/24-02 16/03/02-09 16/03/02-07 16/03/02-06 16/03/02-01 16/02/11-07 16/03/02-11 16/02/29-16 16/02/29-16 16/02/29-16 16/02/29-16 16/03/02-17 16/03/02-17 16/03/02-17 16/03/02-17 16/02/20-18 16/02/25-22 16/03/02-21 16/01/16-20 16/01/16-20 16/01/16-20 16/01/16-20

Total 067370 EFT000000005238

Amount

FERGUSON, DON 0001 0002 0003 0004

Total 067356 067370

Description

K MULROONEY TRUCKING LIMITED

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 2016-123496 2016-123500 2016-123501 2016-123497 22016-123499 2016-123492 2016-123498

Total EFT000000005238 EFT000000005266 4/5/2016

Page:

9

Page 99 of 154

37.5 HRS @ $154 21.5 HRS @ $159 41.5 HRS @ $154 34.5 HRS @ $154 76 HRS @ $147 9.5 HRS @ $147 89 HRS @ $147

$5,876.64 $3,478.67 $6,503.48 $5,406.51 $11,368.63 $1,421.08 $13,313.26 $47,368.27

36.5 HRS @ $75

$2,785.68 $2,785.68

TEM ROADWORK 107904

Total EFT000000005266

Total Snw Plwng

$74,426.98

3506 Snow Clearing Sidewalks Cheque 067370

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/03/02-12 16/03/02-12 16/03/02-12 16/03/02-12 16/03/02-12 16/02/29-44 16/02/29-45 16/02/29-47 16/02/23-48 16/03/02 - 06 16/02/20-07 16/02/26-08 16/02/26-09 16/01/28-29 16/01/28-29 16/01/28-29 16/01/28-29 16/02/24-15

4.5 HRS @ $43 1 HR @ $43 1 HR @ $43 2 HRS @ $43 1.5 HRS @ $43 2 PLOWS @ $43 3.5 HRS @ $43 1 HR @ $43 5 HRS @ $43 6 HRS @ $43 51 HRS @ $43 7.5 HRS @ $43 3 HRS @ $43 4.5 HRS @ $43 8.5 HRS @ $43 2 HRS @ $43 1 HR @ $43 12.5 HRS @ $43

Total 067370

Total Snow Clearing Sidewalks

$196.91 $43.76 $43.76 $87.50 $65.63 $87.51 $153.15 $43.76 $218.78 $262.54 $2,231.60 $328.18 $131.27 $196.91 $371.93 $87.51 $43.76 $546.96 $5,141.42

$5,141.42

3525 Snw Remvl Cheque 067370

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/19-46 16/02/23-49 16/02/22-10

FLAGGING SNOW REMOVAL 7 HRS @ $39 7.5 HRS @ $39

Total 067370

Total Snw Remvl

$1,289.81 $277.80 $297.65 $1,865.26

$1,865.26

3535 Surface Fldng Cheque 067370

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/24-05

3.5 HRS @ $43

Total 067370

Total Surface Fldng

$153.15 $153.15

$153.15

3610 Trfc Sg mnt Cheque EFT000000005270

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

TRUE ELECTRIC

Total EFT000000005270

$496.59 $132.29 $628.88

Total Trfc Sg mnt

$628.88

6691 6691

RUTLEDGE/PERTH ROAD CAUTION INVERARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

3615 Wayfnd sign Cheque EFT000000005209

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 350828

Vendor

Description

BMR MANUFACTURING INC. SIGNS

Amount $872.74

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

10

Page 100 of 154

Total EFT000000005209

$12,225.58 $13,098.32

Total Wayfnd sign

$13,098.32

350827

SIGNS

3640 Warning Sgns Cheque EFT000000005262

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SIGNS PLUS

Total EFT000000005262

$42.68 $42.68

Total Warning Sgns

$42.68

2927

36” STREET SIGN

3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005270

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

TRUE ELECTRIC

Total EFT000000005270

$392.90 $495.16 $888.06

Total Street Lights

$888.06

6691 6691

BATTERSEA BY NEW MAIL BOXES SPAFFORD CORNERS/RUTLEDGE

3800 Crssng Guards Cheque EFT000000005197

Date

Inv #

3/30/2016 16/03 16/03

Total EFT000000005197 EFT000000005198 3/30/2016

Vendor

Description

MACINTYRE, DOUG 16 DAYS @ $30.00 16/03 WSIB MACINTYRE CROSSING

Amount $480.00 $13.82 $493.82

SNIDER, DEBBIE 16/03 16/03

16 DAYS @ $45.00 16/03 SNIDER WSIB

Total EFT000000005198

Total Crssng Guards

$720.00 $20.74 $740.74

$1,234.56

Total Trans

$300,626.29

40 Env 5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque 067353 Total 067353 EFT000000005226

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

032589

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE SAW BLADES

217554

GANANOQUE CHEVROLET CADILLAC OIL CHANGE

4/5/2016

Amount $20.34 $20.34

Total EFT000000005226

$20.29 $20.29

Total SW & Fac OH

$40.63

5105 Garb coll Cheque 067349

Total 067349 EFT000000005194

Date

Inv #

3/30/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/03 16/03

16/03 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION

16/03

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/03 COLLECTION

3/30/2016

Total EFT000000005194 EFT000000005254 4/5/2016

$11,274.39 $9,306.49 $20,580.88 $11,517.09 $11,517.09

PETRIE FORD 208882

WIPER BLADES, FILTERS

Total EFT000000005254

Total Garb coll

$115.25 $115.25

$32,213.22

5110 Gab disp Cheque 067370

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/03/01-11

1 LOAD GARBAGE

$178.08

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 16/03/01-43 16/02/28-43 16/03/11-13

Total 067370 067373

4/5/2016 15-032

Total 067373 EFT000000005199

3/30/2016

TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC REIMBURSE FOR WASTE AD

WHALEY, GEORGE 16/03 DISPOSAL 16/03 DISPOSAL

Total EFT000000005199 EFT000000005202 4/5/2016 02362259 01360866 04366746

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. FEBRUARY PEST CONTROL JANUARY PEST CONTROL APRIL PEST CONTROL

84331 84571

ENVIRO-GUARD PLUS INC. FEBRUARY PEST CONTROL MARCH PEST CONTROL

Total EFT000000005202 EFT000000005220 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005220 EFT000000005257 4/5/2016

34 HRS @ $80 KEELEY RD BIN RENTAL 21 HRS @ $80

PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000214703 1 LOAD CONSTRUCTION DEMO 647-0000021528 60.19T GARBAGE 647-0000021557 2.08T GARBAGE

Total EFT000000005257

Total Gab disp

Page:

11

Page 101 of 154 $2,767.87 $152.64 $1,709.57 $4,808.16 $35.90 $35.90 $1,935.80 $1,935.80 $93.25 $93.25 $93.25 $279.75 $42.74 $42.74 $85.48 $623.22 $5,563.80 $178.85 $6,365.87

$13,510.96

5200 Recyc Cheque EFT000000005269

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016 57608 200862

Vendor

Description

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE RECYCLE BOX SUPPLIES RECYCLE BIN MATERIALS.

Total EFT000000005269

Total Recyc

Amount $433.25 $330.90 $764.15

$764.15

5205 Recyc Coll Cheque 067349

Total 067349 EFT000000005194

Date

Inv #

3/30/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/03 16/03 16/03

16/03 COLLECTION 16/03 COLLECTION 16/02 COLLECTION

16/03

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/03 COLLECTION

3/30/2016

Total EFT000000005194

Total Recyc Coll

$12,162.26 $10,605.36 $11,320.42 $34,088.04 $9,907.17 $9,907.17

$43,995.21

5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 067370

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/02/19-10 16/02/28-43

1 LOAD CON-SALEM PORTLAND & SALEM BIN RENTAL

Total 067370

Total Rec Disp/Prc

$534.24 $457.92 $992.16

$992.16

Total Env

$91,516.33

70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque EFT000000005195

Date

Inv #

3/30/2016 16/03

Total EFT000000005195

Total Health

Vendor

Description

D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS 16/03

Amount $875.14 $875.14

$875.14

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Cem

Page:

12

Page 102 of 154 $875.14

80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067352 Total 067352 067357

Total 067357 067359

Total 067359 067360

Total 067360 067365

Total 067365 067374

Total 067374 EFT000000005196

Date

Inv #

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

4/5/2016

LOCKBOX

$205.89 $205.89

FISHER, DAVE 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

$30.30 $30.30 $30.30 $90.90

HOLLAND, TRACY 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 6.2 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 6.2 KMS @ $.55

Total EFT000000005211 EFT000000005221 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005221

$30.30 $3.07 $30.30 $3.07 $66.74

HOWE, MIKE 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC

16/02/29 - SF REC 10 KMS @ $.55 16/01/18 - SF REC 10 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 10 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $4.96 $30.30 $4.96 $30.30 $4.96 $105.78

MOREY, PAM 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC

16/02/29 - SF REC 10.6 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $5.25 $35.55

133270344-004 134288524-002

UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC MODULAR FENCE MODULAR FENCE

16/03

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/03 MAINTENANCE

2535

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE WATER SOFTENER SALT

Total EFT000000005196 EFT000000005204 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005210 EFT000000005211 4/5/2016

Amount

A-1 LOCKSMITHS

3/30/2016

Total EFT000000005208 EFT000000005210 4/5/2016

Description

790722

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005204 EFT000000005208 4/5/2016

Vendor

$122.11 $915.84 $1,037.95 $142.50 $142.50 $104.67 $104.67

BELL, DAN 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC

16/02/29 - SF REC 15 KMS @ $.55 16/01/18 - SF REC 15 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 15 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $7.43 $30.30 $7.43 $30.30 $7.43 $113.19

BROWN, DONNA 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC

16/01/18 - SF REC 90 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 90 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $44.58 $30.30 $44.58 $149.76

CAMPBELL, ANNIE 16/01/25 - S REC 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC ERLICHMAN, WOLFE 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 75 KMS @ $.55 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 75 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 75 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $30.30 $30.30 $90.90 $30.30 $37.14 $30.30 $37.14 $30.30 $37.14 $202.32

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005223

11:12:16 AM

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005223 EFT000000005239 4/5/2016

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

$30.30 $31.70 $30.30 $31.70 $30.30 $31.70 $30.30 $30.30 $30.30 $276.90

KOT, JOHN 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC

16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC

$30.30 $30.30 $60.60

3761461

METROLAND MEDIA GROUP FEBRUARY ADVERTISING

211858

N.C.D.D. WOODWORKING CABINETS

11280

NORTHWAY HARDWARE 3 BAGS SALT

Total EFT000000005248 EFT000000005251 4/5/2016

PANTREY, AMANDA 16/03/28 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC SECRETARY 16/02/22 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC SECRETARY 16/01/25 - S REC 16/01/25 - S REC SECRETARY ROLLINS, ELLWOOD 16/02/22 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

Total EFT000000005261 EFT000000005263 4/5/2016 4126 4152 Total EFT000000005263 EFT000000005264 4/5/2016

57572

Total EFT000000005274 EFT000000005277 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005277 EFT000000005278 4/5/2016

SIMMONS PLUMBING & PUMP SERV. REPAIR LEAK BASEMENT CEILING NO WATER BEDFORD HALL

SMITH, ROBERTA 16/01/25 - S REC 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

Total EFT000000005264 EFT000000005269 4/5/2016 Total EFT000000005269 EFT000000005274 4/5/2016

Page 103 of 154

16/02/29 - SF REC 64 KMS @ $.55 16/01/18 - SF REC 64 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 64 KMS @ $.55 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

Total EFT000000005246 EFT000000005248 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005252 EFT000000005261 4/5/2016

13

FOX, KEVIN 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/01/25 - S REC 16/02/22 - S REC 16/03/28 - S REC

Total EFT000000005239 EFT000000005246 4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005251 EFT000000005252 4/5/2016

Page:

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE BOARDS FOR DOCKS

VANDEWAL, SARAH 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC SECRETARY 16/02/29 - SF REC 7.8 KMS @ $.55 16-01-18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC SECRETARY 16-01-18 - SF REC 7.8 KMS @ $.55 16/03/21 - SF REC 16/03/21 - SF REC SECRETARY 16/03/21 - SF REC 7.8 KMS @ $.55

$549.50 $549.50 $3,561.60 $3,561.60 $24.39 $24.39 $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 $195.00 $30.30 $30.30 $60.60 $336.32 $106.85 $443.17 $30.30 $30.30 $30.30 $90.90 $5.90 $5.90 $65.00 $3.87 $65.00 $3.87 $65.00 $3.87 $206.61

WASH, PAUL 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC

16/01/18 - SF REC 9 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $4.46 $34.76

WOOD, ALVIN 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/02/29 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC 16/01/18 - SF REC

16/02/29 - SF REC 44 KMS @ $.55 16/01/18 - SF REC 44 KMS @ $.55

$30.30 $21.80 $30.30 $21.80 $104.20

Total EFT000000005278

Total Rec

$7,960.28

8025 Day Cmps Cheque 067381

Date 4/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

SNIDER, DEREK REC.67105 REFND

Description DCLP4 REFUND

Amount $230.00

System:

3/31/2016

User ID:

srummell

11:12:16 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total 067381

Page:

14

Page 104 of 154 $230.00

Total Day Cmps

$230.00

Total Rec

$8,190.28

99 9999 Cheque 067376 Total 067376 067377 Total 067377 EFT000000005238

Date 4/5/2016

4/5/2016

Inv #

DOORNEKAMP, ARIE 1-1-24710 REFUND 010-010-24710 REFUND

2016-13347 2016-13348

Total EFT000000005275

Description

DISALLE, NICHOLAS 2-2-38800 REFUND 2-2-38800 REFUND

4/5/2016

Total EFT000000005238 EFT000000005275 4/5/2016

Vendor

K MULROONEY TRUCKING LIMITED BYLAW CHARGES BYLAW CHARGES

VELEY AMANDA & TAPSCOTT, EVAN 4-2-18710 REFUND 4-2-18710 REFUND

Amount $485.38 $485.38 $115.08 $115.08 $3,536.90 $3,909.24 $7,446.14 $267.63 $267.63

Total

$8,314.23

Total

$8,314.23

Total

$1,943,654.51

Page 105 of 154

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council

Planning Department

Agenda Date: April 5, 2016 Report Date: March 28, 2016

Applicant: 1059823 Ont. Ltd. Matias

Subject: Amendment to Subdivision Agreement in Part of Lots 18 & 19, Concession II, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Willowbrook Estates

SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council pass By-law Number 2016-24 to amend Schedule “B” of the subdivision agreement with 1059823 Ontario Ltd. (Tony Matias) for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates subdivision. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a request to amend the Willowbrook subdivision agreement to reduce the required security recognizing that more of the works were completed before the subdivision agreement was finalized. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2016 Council passed By-law Number 2016-14 to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a subdivision agreement between the Township and 1059823 Ontario Ltd. (Tony Matias). The subdivision agreement is to be registered on the title of the land to permit development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision. The subdivision agreement includes Schedule “B” Cost of Works. This is a list, prepared and certified by a licensed professional engineer, that estimates the costs to complete all of the works in the plan of subdivision. The schedule lists such things as street lighting, swales, asphalt and landscape buffers and estimates the costs to complete each of them. The Township must receive a letter of credit for the total estimated cost before the agreement can be registered. This is a security to ensure that the works will be constructed as agreed to. Attachment #1 is a copy of Schedule “B”. The subdivision agreement is not yet registered but the owners’ are requesting that Schedule “B” be amended to reduce the amount from $284,430.00 to $155,555.00. This is based on the fact that much of the work has already been completed including adding topsoil and seeding roadside ditches and swales, and tree planting and landscape buffers. A copy of the amended estimate is attached as Attachment #2. This reduced estimate is also certified by a licensed professional engineer. CONCLUSION The reduction in the estimated costs to complete the works seems warranted. The revised estimate has been certified by a professional engineer and Township staff have seen the work. It is staff’s opinion that Schedule “B” should be amended as requested.

Page 106 of 154 RECOMMENDATION

On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that By-law Number 201624 to amend Schedule “B” of the subdivision agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 Ontario Ltd. for development of Phase 1 of the Willowbrook Estates Subdivision, be passed.

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments MatiasSubdivionReducedCostsReport

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

Page 107 of 154 Pagel74of231

ATTACHMENT #1 SCHEDULE “B” OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMtNT COST OF WORKS

ENGWF,RIS ESTIMATE OF COST TO COMPLETE Wn,LOWBROOK ESTATES SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 LOTS 1 to 7

Original Cost

Cost to

to Construct

Complete

CLEARING AND GRUBBING of Roadway

$14,100

$0

STRIP TO?F’SOIL of Rqadway

$17,500

$0

GRANULAR BASE ROADS

$82,200

$0

$204,500

$0

DESCRIPTION AND COST OF WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED

GRADING FOR ROAD ALLOWANCE including Cut/Fill for Floodplairi Compensation EROSION CONTROL

$5,000

$0

TOPSOIL & SEED - ROADSIDE DITCHES

$49,000

$49,000

SWALES (including Topsoil and Scid) ,

$6,600

$3,600

ASPHALT

$52,800

$52,800

culverts)

$46,800

$0

STREETLIGHT SYSTEM

$17,100

$0

StGNS

$?,400

$0

CONCRETE SIDEWALK - PF,RTH ROAD

$10,300

$10,300

UTIIATIES SYSTEM (Bell, Transformer Pads & Ducts)

S31J60

$0

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (Ttansforrnation & Wiring)

$26,680

$0

DITCH & TOPSOn, & SEED ON PERTH ROAD

$29,500

$18,000

TREE PLANTrNG: (One tree per .l6t)

$2,500

$2,5CI0

LANDSCAPING BtJFFER

$25,000

$25,000

PERTH ROAD - Right Turn Taper (inqludes asphalt, granulars & Iirie painttng)

$19,445

$19,445

SUB-TOTAL

$648,185

$180,645

CONTINGENC’[ES (5% 6f constructiot’i cost)

$32;409

$9,032

ENGrNEER?NG ’n’qSPECT?ON & TESTrNG (7% qf construction cost)

$45,373

$12,645

SUB-TOTAL

$725,967

$202,322

H.S.T. (1 .76% muntcipal rate)

$12,777

$3,561

TOTAL EST’IMATED COST

$738,744

$205,883

SfaORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM includiqg culverti (not including driveway

Value of Work Completed

5523,645

Maintenance Holdback (5% oT work completed)

$26,182

Lein Holdback (10%)

$52,365

Toial Securities Requtred

$284,430

Date of this Estimate: September 4, 2015

h&f?rrEs810Q ??"‘S?z

IQ r0 e

N;) g 7-+: '

JS UJ

.l:!€.)J.m.JOSSELYN ,‘G?

%" OF l’

Paap 1

Page 108 of 154

ATTACHMENT #2 ENGnNEER’S ESTnV{ATE OF COST TO COMPLETE WILLOWBROOK ESTATES SUBI)IVISION PHASE 1 LOTS 1 to 7 Original Cost

Cost to

to Construd

Complete

CLEARIN G AND GRUBBING of Roadway

$14,100

$0

S? TOPSOn, of Roadway

$17,500

$0

GRANULAR BASE ROADS

$82,200

$0

GRADING FOR ROAD ALLOWAN CE includtng Cut/Fill for Floodplain Compensation

DESCRn"TION AND COST OF WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED

$204,500

$0

EROSION CONTROL

$5,000

$0

TOPSOn. & SEED - ROADSIDE DITCHES

$49,000

$0

SWALES (ineluding Topsoil and Sod)

$6,600

$0

ASPHALT

$52,800

$52,800

STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM including mverts (not including driveway culverts)

$46,800

$0

STREETLIGHT SYSTEM

$17,100

$0

SIGNS

$1,400

$0

CONCRETE SDEWALK - PERTH ROAD

$10,300

$10,300

‘[mL?T]ES SYSTEM (Bell, Tramfomer Pads & Ducts)

$37,760

$0

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (Transformation & Wiring)

$26,680

$0

DffCH & TOPSOn, & SEBD ON PERTH ROAD

$29,500 .

$0

TFIBE PLANTING (One tree per lot)

$2,500

$2,500

LANDSCAPING BUF?ER

$25,000

$25,000

PERTH ROAD - Right Tum Taper (includes asphalt, granulars & line painting)

$19,445

$19,445

SUB-TOTAL

$648,185

$110,045

CONT][NGENCIES (5% of construction cost)

$32,409

$5,502

ENGINEER?NG n4SPECT?ON & TESTING (7% of mnstumon cost)

$45,373

$7,703

SUB-TOTAL

$725,967

$123,250

RS.T. (1 .76% municipal rate)

$12,777

$2,169

TOTAL ESWTBD COST

$738,744

$125,419

Value of Work Completed

$602,717

Msiintenance Holdback (5% of work completed)

$30,136

Lien Holdback (10%)

$0

Total Securities Required

$155,555

Date ofthis Estimate: September 11, 2015 Note:

T!iis estimate prepared September 11, 2015 ig based on an assumed level of completion at the time of execution of the gubdtvision agreement. It is further assumed that the Certificate of Subgtantial Performance has been published tn the Daily Commercial News, and that the 45 day hen period has expired..

?loHTh< -/Q w%

r94

‘g m

-1101

?

e-

‘: i.v.idayn ffl

?

Page 109 of 154

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council

Planning Department

Agenda Date: April 5, 2016 Report Date: March 24, 2016 Subject: Proposed Amendments to Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law: Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11

RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the proposed timeline and approach to dealing with the deferral of items 6 and 7 from bylaw 2016-20

BACKGROUND On March 15, 2016 Council considered a number of proposed housekeeping amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning by-law and passed most of the changes. However, Council felt that two of the changes required more review and discussion. These were sections 5.10.2 and 5.11. which deal with reconstruction of buildings that are located within the normally required 30 metre setback from a waterbody. Adjusting for the amendments adopted, the motion passed by Council on March 15, 2016 would read as: That Bylaw 2016-10, being a township initiated housekeeping by-law to amend Bylaw 2003-75, as amended, to effect a number of changes to correct mapping errors that have been identified and to clarify the wording of parts of the text, with items 6 and 7 removed from the bylaw and deferred for two months for further discussion and meetings, be given third reading, signed and sealed. In bringing forward a plan to address the deferral, staff propose that the matter be brought to the April 26, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting with a Planning report that would fully explain the intent of the amendments including a written legal opinion. The meeting would be communicated by email to Lake Association contacts used for the August Lake Association meeting as well as advertised on our website and in our banner ad (on April 14 and 21). Delegates and/or written comments would be invited from residents and Lake Associations to weigh-in on the changes at this meeting. This would also allow for further comments and possibly delegations at the May 10 meeting, if needed, but still allow Council to vote on the matter at the Council meeting (May 17) immediately following the imposed two month deferral period.

Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills ZoningAmendmentsSection5.10.2&5.11

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

Page 110 of 154 th

November 19 , 2015

South Frontenac Township Police Services Board –Annual Public Meeting

Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: Council Chambers, Sydenham Board Members Present:

Ron Vandewal Brad Barbeau

Staff:

Staff Sergeant Sharron Brown

Secretary:

Wayne Orr

  1. Opening of Meeting Ron Vandewal called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
  2. Welcome – Chairman Ron Vandewal welcomed those in attendance. Two members of the public attended.
  3. Introduction of Committee Members The members of the Board and staff representatives were introduced.
  4. Statistical Report •

• • •

• •

•

2015 reporting on the progress to the annual plan is generally ¼ behind. Priorities are set both provincially and at a detachment level with input from the Board. Third quarter statistics were reviewed for the four major areas of reporting. On a rolling 5 years average our levels are doing well Violent Crime: overall 52 year to date compared to 40 this time last year, with assaults representing 31 compared to 24 Property Crime: overall 237 compared to 161 this time last year, with Break and Enters representing 57 compared to 40, thefts under 63 to 52 and mischief 71 to 40 Drug crimes: overall 14 compared to 19 in the prior year Traffic related (Big Four): Impaired, Distracted Driving, Seatbelt and Speeding 1577 compared to 2315 last year. These numbers are skewed by gaps in staffing resources. From a financial perspective policing costs will increase $36,419 in 2016 for a total cost of $2,902,091

  1. Comments from the Public: • The two members of the public sought clarity on when an issue should be directed to bylaw or police services. • Staff explained the role of the township’s bylaw enforcement services and the potential for issues to escalate requiring the police. Residents should feel comfortable calling both Bylaw enforcement services and the OPP if they are unsure. The township’s noise bylaw can be found on the township website and those in attendance were encouraged to call and seek clarification from the bylaw team on how to address concerns • The public also inquired as to how they could be better informed about news items and asked why the email distribution of press releases stopped. The CAO and staff Sargent will explore ways to share this information.
  2. Other Business There was no other business.

1

Page 111 of 154 th

November 19 , 2015

  1. Adjournment There being no further business the Public meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m.

Chair Ron Vandewal

Secretary Wayne Orr

2

Page 112 of 154 November 19, 2015 South Frontenac Township Police Services Board Meeting Time: 7:00 p.m. Location: South Frontenac Township Council Chambers Board Members Present:

Ron Vandewal Brad Barbeau

Staff:

Staff Sergeant Sharron Brown

Secretary:

Wayne Orr

  1. Call to Order The Chair called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
  2. Attendance – Ron Vandewal, Brad Barbeau, Sharron Brown, Wayne Orr
  3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest - nil
  4. Approval of Agenda Moved by Brad Barbeau That the agenda be approved.

Seconded by Ron Vandewal Carried.

  1. Approval of Minutes – deferred until the next meeting.
  2. Presentations/Delegations – none
  3. Correspondence • •

Zone meeting – Brad Barbeau is unable to attend at this time Resolution from Neebing seeking to establish 2 tier policing with nonuniformed safety personnel. Sharron Brown explained how civilian personnel are working in limited roles such as court security here. They are given special constable status which gives them limited authority within specific locations. This item will be addressed at a higher level such as AMO.

  1. Financial – no report
  2. Detachment Commanders Report Further to the details discussed in the public meeting: • Our clearance rates for violent crime are strong • There are no new civilian complaints against police and the current two are working through the system • The detachment has had a transfer-in replacing a recently promoted officer • Another officer has been promoted to the SAVE unit and will be leaving the detachment (to be filled) • Motor Vehicle Collisions: after Road 38, Rutledge Road seems to have the highest MVC count

1

Page 113 of 154 November 19, 2015 •

Staff Sergeant Brown was asked to link this data with traffic volumes to see the correlation of accidents to traffic counts

  1. Committee Reports – none
  2. Other Business •

The quote for the Mobile speed and message sign is over budget.

Moved by Brad Barbeau Seconded by Ron Vandewal That the Police Services Board request Council to allocate additional resources from the Policing reserve to cover the overall cost of $14,653.84. This includes data collection software. Carried. •

•

•

The intent is that the Police will provide primary direction on where to deploy the sign in consultation with the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department may also access the sign for communicating warnings related to other issues Advertising: the first of two weekly ½ page ads appeared in this week’s paper. Staff Sergeant Brown is to forward a more seasonal ad prepared for several weeks of insertion and to have the approximately 6 messages prepared for next year. There is a joint awareness assembly taking place at the High school next week with EMS, Fire, Public Works and OPP aimed at grade 12 students around the risks of the road.

  1. Public Discussion – none
  2. Date and Time of Next Meeting •

The 2016 meeting schedule is anticipated to be the months of March, June, September and November.

  1. In-Camera – n/a
  2. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.

Ron Vandewal, Chair

Wayne Orr, Secretary

2

Page 114 of 154

Corporate Services Committee

Minutes – Jan 15, 2106 – 10:30am

Present: Alan Revill, John McDougall, Ross Sutherland, Wayne Orr, Louise Fragnito Item

Topic

Outcome / Recommendation

1

Declaration of Pecuniary interest Minutes

None

2 3

Business Arising A. Notice Provision Bylaw review B. Desert Lake Causeway /Parking C. CofA appointment process D. Contractor Lease E. Financial Services to Arena F. Communication Customer Service Policy G. Investment Policy

Moved by JM Seconded by RS - Minutes of Dec 18, 2015 CARRIED No response from County or to follow up request. To follow up with CRCA and request copy of the MNR license to fill beach with Sand outstanding Lease issued, awaiting response Joint report from Treasurers issued to Arena Board Outstanding

5

Policy revised as requested. Moved by RS seconded by JM to bring policy to COW, CARREID H. Seniors Housing JM has initiated conversations with County Planner. I. Septic Re-inspection To invite Tay Valley CBO and our CBO to the next meeting to discuss. CBO’s to connect in advance J. Compensation Draft report reviewed. Moved by RS seconded by JM to bring the report to Council with the first 2 recommendations. New Business A. Budget notice Direction to tweak Draft notice by law to include the opportunity for delegations on the budget following it being tabled but before the Saturday session instead of advance delegations. B. Appointments to Committee feels that the number of representatives seems high. Cat. Trail Committee To be raised with council C. Organizational 10 bids received, 3 to be interviewed review Other Business

6

Next Meeting

4

Friday February 19,2016 at 10:30 am

Page 115 of 154

South Frontenac Recreation Committee Minutes Monday, January 18, 2016 Attendance: Chair Mike Howe, Vice-Chair Dan Bell, Councillor Pat Barr, Councillor Mark Schjerning, Kevin Fox, Tim Laprade, Paul Wash, Wolfe Erlichman, Alvin Wood, Donna Brown Regrets: Councillor Norm Roberts

  1. Call to Order
  2. Approval of Minutes – Monday, December 14, 2015 Motion to approve the minutes from Monday, December 14, 2015 Moved by: Kevin Fox Seconded by: Vice-Chair Dan Bell Carried
  3. Business Arising from the Minutes
  1. New Business a. Elections of Chair and Vice-Chair Nominations for Chair • Mike Howe was nominated by Dan Bell. • The nomination was accepted and the vote was unanimous. • Mike Howe will continue as Chair of the South Frontenac Recreation Committee for 2016. Nominations for Vice-Chair • Dan Bell was nominated by Kevin and seconded by Paul Wash. • The nomination was accepted and the vote was unanimous. • Dan Bell was elected as Vice-Chair of the South Frontenac Recreation Committee for 2016. b. Canada Day Fireworks Update

Page 116 of 154

c. 2017 Canada Day Event

  1. Updates a. Recreation Guide

Page 2

Page 117 of 154

South Frontenac Recreation Committee Minutes Monday, February 29, 2016 Attendance: Chair Mike Howe, Vice-Chair Dan Bell, Councillor Pat Barr, Councillor Mark Schjerning, Councillor Norm Roberts, Kevin Fox, Tim Laprade, Wolfe Erlichman, Alvin Wood, Pam Morey, Tracy Holland, Jamie Brash Regrets: Donna Brown

  1. Call to Order
  2. Approval of Minutes – Monday, January 16, 2016 Motion to approve the minutes from Monday, January 16, 2016 Moved by: Vice-Chair Dan Bell Seconded by: Councillor Pat Barr Carried
  3. Business Arising from the Minutes
  4. New Business a. Bowes Park Playground – Jamie Brash

Page 118 of 154

c. Standardization of Recreation Committee Secretaries payments and process

  1. Updates a. Recreation Guide

Page 2

Page 119 of 154

d. 2017 Canada Day “combined’ event (feedback from Districts)

Page 3

Page 120 of 154

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE February 18, 2016

Present

Mayor Ron Vandewal Councillors: Alan Revill, Ron Sleeth, Mark Schjerning Staff: Wayne Orr, Mark Segsworth

Call to Order

Declaration of Pecuniary Interest – None

Approval of minutes – January 21, 2016 Moved by: Alan Revill Seconded: Mark Schjerning Carried

Sydenham Parking Mark informed the Committee that he had met with the Principal of Sydenham High School about the parking issue in front of the School. Signage would help, but enforcement would be a challenge and there is the issue of where parents would pick up and drop off students. One suggestion was perhaps having a 10 minute loading zone. Sydenham Parking will be addressed at the March 8th COW meeting, a By-law is to be drafted after the meeting.

Harrowsmith EA The Committee agreed that the traffic light system at Road 38 and Wilton Road made more sense. Mark informed the Committee that the proposal had been discussed with both the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and the County of Frontenac. This option would be presented to Council prior to having a Public meeting. The project is proposed to be completed by Canada Day 2017. Public meeting in Harrowsmith has been scheduled for March 21 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the S & A Club.

Intersection Reconfiguration The three areas addressed were Latimer Road onto Round Lake Road, Holleford Road and Trousdale Road and Holleford Road and Vanluven Road. These areas currently rely on Yield signs and it was felt that having Stop signs erected on one road would create safer conditions. The Committee suggested having traffic counts done at these intersections, after which time the data would be brought forward to the Committee for the best option. It was also questioned whether Latimer and Round Lake Road should be a 3-Way stop.

Road Classifications Mark informed the Committee that the original classifications had been based on estimated traffic counts in 2004. It was felt that there should be a 4 year cycle using actual traffic counts to review the classifications. Traffic counts in fall of 2016 would be presented to the COW at the September 13th meeting. It was also felt that a By-Law be drafted showing the roads and their classifications.

Page 121 of 154

Speed Limits The Committee discussed procedures/processes for speed limit reduction requests from the public. When a resident calls requesting a lower speed on a road perhaps it should be noted and see if any other requests had been received for the same road. There was also the option of having residents provide a list of signatures for the request. The Committee suggested that staff inquire with surrounding Municipalities on their process and procedures and that it be brought before Council.

Water System Capacity Some suggestions were having a student available to do a census for the actual population served by the water system, or when the meter reading was done, leaving a note in each door requesting number of individual in each household. It was difficult to calculate the population as some residents that are connected to the water system are still utilizing their wells.

Committee Initiatives Discussion ensued around the Sunbury Road EDR. The MTO denied the Township’s request for a delegator at OGRA/ROMA. A meeting of staff has been scheduled with the Regional Office for March 16, 1026.

Other Business Snow Removal – Mark informed Committee that Sydenham was currently being done and then Verona. Street Lights – Wellington Street had 2 lights out at the end of the street. Waste Diversion Act – Mark to provide information to the Committee on the changes occurring.

Next Meeting – Thursday, March 17, 2016 – Town Hall Board Room

Adjournment – 9:50 a.m.

Page 122 of 154 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-24

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW No. 2016-14 TO CHANGE SCHEDULE ?B’ OF THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND 1059823 ONTARIO LIMITED (TONY MATIAS).

WHEREAS a Subdivision Agreement has been entered into between the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 0ntario Limited;

AND WHEREAS Council has agreed that Schedule ?B? ‘Cost of Works’ of the Subdivision Agreement should be amended to recognize that certain of the works have now been complcted;

NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCI, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. THAT the subdivision agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and 1059823 0ntario Limited, is hereby amended by replacing Schedule ?B? with a new revised Schedule “B” a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule " 1" and forming part of this by-law.

THISBY-LAWshallcomeintoforceandeffectinaccordancewithsection51of

the Planning Act 1990, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 51.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifth day of April 2016. Read a first and second time this fijth day of April, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this fifth day of April, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 123 of 154

SCHEDULE “1 ll SCHEDULE “B” OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT COST OF WORKS

:zncnipxos ESTIMATE OF cos’r TO com:txrx Wn,LOWBROOK ‘ESTATES SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 LOTS1 to7

Original Cogt

Cost to

to Construct

Complete

CLEARIN G AND GRUBB?NG of Roadway

$14,100

$0

STRTP TOPSOn, of Roadway

$17,500

$0

G?AR BASB ROADS

$82,200

$0

$204,500

$0

EROSION CONTROL

$5,000

$0

TOPSO’n. & SEED - ROADSIDE Dr’rCHES

$49,000

$0

SWALES (ineluding Topsoil mid Sod)

$6,600

$0

ASPHALT

$52,800

$52,800

culverts)

$46,800

$0

STREETI,IGHT SYSTEM

$17,100

$0

SIGNS

$1,400

5,o

CONCRETE SIDEWALK - PERTH ROAD

$10,300

$10,300

‘[mL:[TTES SYSTEM (Bell, Transfomier Pads & Ducts) ELECn;I?CAL SYSTEM (Transfomation & Wiring)

$37,760

$0

$26,680

$0

D:[TCH & TOPSOn, & SEBI) ON PERTH ROAD

$29,500 .

TREE PLANTING (One tree per lot)

$2,500

$2,500

LAN?)SCAP?:NG BUFFER

$25,000

$25,000

PERTH ROAD - Right Tum Taper (includes asphalt, ymulus & line painhng)

$19,445

$19,445

StJB-TOTAL

$648,185

$110,045

CON’ffNGENC:[ES (5% of construction cp*) ENGINEERn’JG ]:NSPBCTION & TESTING (7% of constudion cogt)

$32,409

$5,502

$45,373

$7,703

SUB-TOTAL

$725,967

$123,250

H.S.T. (1 .76% municipal rate)

$12,777

$2,169

TOTAL ESan[MATED COST

$738,744

$125,419

DESCRIPTION AND COST OF WORK!l TO BR CONSTRUCTED

GRADING FOR ROAD ALLOWANCE including Cut/Fill for Floodplatn Compensation

STORM DRATNAGE SYSTEM including culverts (not including driveway

$0

Value of Work Completed

$602,717

Maintenance Holdback (5% of work completed)

$30,136 50

Lien Holdback (10%)

$155,555

Total Securities Required Date of this Eatimate. Septamber 11, 2015 Note:

aThis estimate prepared September 11, 2015 is based on an assutned level of completion at the tme of

execition of the subdivision agreameni. It is fiirther asmuned that the Certificate of Substantial Perfomiance

has been pubushed in the Daily Cornmercial News, and that the 45 day lten period haIs expired..

iQ E S s l oh*K?, -/Q gQt

194

!e? m ‘J

l?

j.M.J SELYN o

9

Page 124 of 154 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-25 BEING A BY-LAW TO DECLARE LANDS AS SURPLUS TO THE MUNICIPALITY’S NEEDS AND TO AUTHORIZE THE SALE OF SUCH LANDS DESCRIBED AS PART OF LOT 14, CONCESSION IX, BEDFORD DISTRICT: AMEY WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient and in the interest of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac that 100 acres of land in Bedford District in the Township of South Frontenac County of Frontenac being Part of Lot 14, Concession IX, ,Bedford be declares as surplus; AND WHEREAS it is further deemed expedient and in the interests of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac that the land be sold; AND WHEREAS pursuant to the Township of South Frontenac’s Notice By-law No. 2002-92, the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac caused to be advertised the proposed sale of the lands; AND WHEREAS no objections have been received to the sale of the lands; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.

THAT 100 acres of land described as Part of Lot 14, Concession IX, Bedford District, Township of South Frontenac be sold to the abutting property-owner, namely Douglas James Amey, such lands shown highlighted on Schedule “1” attached hereto and forming part of this bylaw.

THAT the Mayor and Clerk/Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute such documents as are required; and

THAT this By-law shall come into force and take effect upon registration of this By-law.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifth day of April, 2016. Read a first and second time this fifth day of April, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this fifth day of April, 2016.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 125 of 154

SCHEDULEI?1

17

TO BY-LAW 2016-25 12,.

.1

k

x

I’

01

‘-4

‘rA

9.7

k

ffi.

*,l? /.U// O/ -eff–? ?(j

k

[1

?

l

.1

% J

ri r

%

%

‘-,.

I

k

J j

U

i ‘-,.

it

11

,,-7 J

a

j

J

J

J

Rock Lake

i)

7,

J

Lrttle Wolfe Lak

r

f

oeLa)(e!

1

1

}l /

?ra’aTee Lake

r

Folsom Lake

-Jl.-

%l K M ‘71

l {

e

m 4%ro n s ’l-a k e

? 11 ’s ,i

tl

r( 2

%

%

?N ,=-??

,ffi

Paddysl%Lake l

11

1

‘C"J G

-*J ‘J

u

DEVIL

B0AD

sJ 0,

-” 4,

‘))VD e v il L a k e

.?

?M?JL a k i

r

Page 126 of 154

INFORMATION REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

March 31, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

April 12, 2016

SUBJECT: Tender PW-2016-08 Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning Program (20162018) BACKGROUND: Each year the Township contracts for Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning Program within the various villages in the township. (see attachment for locations) The tender was prepared and advertised and closed on March 16, 2016 at 1:00 pm There were only two contractors that bid on this tender. The results are listed below, prices exclude HST, Munro & Scullion Contracting

Percy Snider

2016 Street Sweeping

$19,475.46

$20,839.50

2016 Catch Basin

$18,656.00

$18,480.04

Total

$38,131.46

$39,319.54

2017 Street Sweeping

$19,866.10

$21,257.50

2017 Catch Basin

$20,064.00

$19,874.76

Total

$39,930.10

$41,132.26

2018 Street Sweeping

$19,866.10

$21,257.50

2018 Catch Basin

$20,064.00

$19,874.76

Total

$39,930.10

$41,132.26

Grand Total

$117,991.66

$121,584.06

The prices for previous years were as follows: 2014

2015

A&A Asphalt

$68,283.00

$68,283.00

Percy Snider

$30,353.30

$28,792.60

The municipality investigated 3 references given by the lowest bidder and our findings where all good. One reference has been using the low bidder for over 20 years in business without any issue and also said he will continue to use the contractor going forward.

Page 127 of 154

INFORMATION REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Due to the fact that all 3 references checked out in good standing with the low bidder and that there is $3,592.40 between the 2 bidders, the Public Works Department will be awarding to Munro & Scullion Contracting, the 2016 – 2018 Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning Program. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Sufficient funds exist in the Operations Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A of Tender PW-2016-08

Submitted/approved by: Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager,

Prepared by: Brian Kirk, CRS- I Area Supervisor

Page 128 of 154

APPENDIX A 2016-2018 Street Sweeping & Catch Basin Cleaning Program Locations & Lengths

  1. SYDENHAM

Location

  1. BATFERSEA

Length (m)*

Location

Length (m)*

1100

Battersea Rd. (Larry Y. to North end)

2200

George St.

450

Sarah St.

200

Mill St.

400

Water St.

110

William St.

500

Cross St.

120

Amelia St.

200

Wellington St.

250

Brewery St.

250

Wheatley St.

500

Point Rd.

200

Church St.

350

Bedford Rd.(Beer Store to Vic. ES“)

Walker Rd. (Portland to Quarry)

400

Portland Rd.

850

Rutledge Rd. (Bridge to Shallow Ln‘)

2000

Stagecoach Rd. (Rd5 to Campbell)

650

Ashwood Dr.

900

Deer Run Way

  1. SUNBURY

Location

Length (m)*

Rd.

500

S ””b””’ Rd.

10 0

Battersea

_

Moreland Dixon Rd.

500

4’ INVERARY

Location

Length (m)*

Latimer Rd. (Rd 10 East)

450

400

Latimer Rd_ (Rd 10 West)

200

Fox Ridge Trail

500

Fairgrounds Rd.

350

Morgan Dr.

300

Division St.

350

Keeley Intersection

100

Perth Rd-

Syd. & Rutl Rd. Inter.

100

(Moreland D. Rd. North Bound)

Syd. & Rail Rd. Inter.

100

Note—All Road Lengths are In Centreline metres

1000

5. VERONA

Location

Length (m)*

Hwy 38 ( Desert L. Rd t 0 F0° dl3“ d)

350°

Bellrock Rd. (Hwy 38 West)

150

'

Cedarwoods (To Cul—De—Sac)

Page 129 of 154

  1. HARTINGTON

650

Location

Length (m)*

Boyce Rd.

600

Holleford Rd.

150

Hwy 38 ( Leonard’s Fuel North)

400

Hinchenbrook Rd.

200

Valleyview

450

Forest Hill Point

400

Location

Length (m)*

Burnett Rd.

300

Maple Dr_

550

Hwy 38 ( l\lursery to Centennial P. Rd.)

1700

Davey Rd.

450

Wilton Rd. (Railway

  1. HARROWSMITH

to

HWV

200

Verona Sand Rd. . (To end of Hotmlx)

1500

Verona St.

900

Colebrook Rd‘ (To Golden Links)

1200

McMahon Dr.

250

Notre Dame St.

700

Walker St.

100

Centennial Park Rd.

450

Bank St.

900

Park St.

200

Revell Rd.

850

Graham Rd.

400

Short St.

50

Church St. W.

100

Genge St.

150

Church St. E.

200

Water St.

150

William St.

200

Cemetery Rd.

60

Maria St.

100

Carleton Dr. (North)

350

Kingston Rd.

250

Salmon Ln.

100

Colebrook Rd. E.

100

Carleton Dr. (South)

100

Lakeview Pine Ridge Rd‘

200 450

Harrowsmith Rd. (Hwy 33 535‘)

450

Easy St_

100

Yarker& Henderson Rd. Intersection

100

Note— All Road Lengths are In Centreline metres

Page 130 of 154

  1. PERTH ROAD

Location

Length (m)*

Location

Length (m)*

Perth Rd Cres.

650

Main St.

440

Wilmer E.

50

Mill St.

220

Wilmer W.

50

Leveque Rd.

100

Opinicon & Shaies

Intersection *

  1. BELLROCKROAD

400

Note—All Road Lengths are In Centreline metres

Catch Basin Clean Outs Location

Est.

Quantity

Sydenham

77

Battersea

17

Sunbury

6

Inverary

14

Bellrock

16

Verona

47

Hartington

11

Harrowsmith

25

Perth Rd & Opinicon Intersection

14

Railton

1

Page 131 of 154

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

March 29th, 2016

Agenda Date:

April 5th, 2016 INFORMATION REPORT

SUBJECT: Tender No. PW-2016-10 – 2016 Micro-Surfacing Program BACKGROUND: This years Micro-Surfacing Tender was prepared and advertised on the Municipal website, on Biddingo, and in the local newspaper. This tender closed on March 23rd, 2016. The results, in ascending order, were as follows: Supplier

Price (Incl. HST)

Miller Paving Ltd.

$211,173.95

Duncor Enterprises Inc.

$249,639.15

ANALYSIS: The submission of the low bidder has been evaluated and was found to be accurate and complete. Miller Paving Ltd. is a reputable contractor with many years of experience in micro-surfacing. For these reasons, and also because their price was $38,465.20 lower than the bid from Duncor Enterprises Inc., the Public Works Department, under delegated authority, has awarded the tender to Miller Paving Ltd., for $211,173.95 including HST. For comparative purposes, below are the historical and current lowest unit prices. Item Average Unit Price$/ per m²

2015

2016 Low Bid

$4.68

$5.49

FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $700,000 was approved in the 2016 Capital Budget for both single surface treatment and micro-surfacing.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

Aaron Hatton Technical Assistant

Page 132 of 154

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

March 23rd, 2016

Agenda Date:

April 12th, 2016 INFORMATION REPORT

SUBJECT: Tender No. PW-2016-15 – 2016 Crack Sealing Program BACKGROUND: This year’s Crack Sealing Tender was prepared and sent out for tender. This tender closed on March 23rd, 2016. The results, in ascending order, were as follows: Supplier

Price (Incl. HST)

Roadlast Asphalt and Sealing Maintenance

$45,482.50

Northern Crack Sealing

$69,212.50

Cornell Construction Ltd.

$77,518.00

ANALYSIS: The submission of the low bidder has been evaluated and was found to be accurate and complete. Roadlast Asphalt and Sealing Maintenance is a reputable contractor with many years of experience in crack sealing. For these reasons, and also because their price was $23,730.00 lower than the bid from Northern Crack Sealing, the Public Works Department has awarded the tender to Roadlast Asphalt and Sealing , for $45,482.50 including HST. For comparison purposes, listed below are the approved lowest bid unit prices from the past 2 years and the current lowest bid unit prices. Item

2014

2015

2016 Low Bid

Unit Price$/ per metre

$0.82

$0.90

$1.05

FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $50,000 was approved in the 2016 Operational Budget for this purpose.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Mark Segsworth P. Eng. Public Works Manager

Aaron Hatton Technical Assistant

Page 133 of 154

INFORMATION REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COW: March 29, 2016 AGENDA DATE:

April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Harrowsmith Intersection on Road 38 PURPOSE: A public information session was held on Monday, March 21, 2016 from 6 – 8 pm to present the preferred alternative for the redesign of the Harrowsmith intersection on Road 38. This report provides a response to the issues raised at the meeting. ANALYSIS: Listed below are the issues raised at the meeting and a response to each issue, follows: CONSIDER MULTI-SIGNALLED INTERSECTION IN PICTION Staff had an opportunity to observe this intersection on March 22. Based on what we saw, it would be possible to signalize most of the existing approaches to Road 38. It is believed that this would lead to more confusion and frustration and longer red light wait times. We have the opportunity to bring clarity and simplicity to this intersection. The objective behind the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) was to improve roadway safety and traffic operations for all. It is Staff’s view that a multi-signalled intersection to replace the existing series of stop signs would be an option if there were no other alternatives to improve intersection geometry, sight distances and facilitating school buses between the 2 schools within close proximity of the intersection. INCREASED TRAFFIC ON NOTRE DAME & RAILWAY STREETS Traffic volumes will be monitored before and after the intersection improvements. Mitigating measures like traffic calming and/or one way streets will be considered, if necessary. It should be noted that these two streets are already being used to avoid the intersection. TEMPORARY SPEED BUMPS This traffic calming approach for the non-winter seasons will be implemented, if necessary, on some of the local roads in Harrowsmith after the intersection has been reconfigured.

Page 134 of 154

INFORMATION REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

TRAFFIC COUNTS The Average Daily Traffic counts over the last 3 years are as follows: Road 38 (north of Harrowsmith) Road 38 (south of Harrowsmith) Harrowsmith Rd (east of Kingston Rd) Wilton Rd (at Road 38) Colebrook Rd (at Road 38)

9973 7728 3644 2642 1706

SIDEWALKS We need to consider extending and upgrading sidewalks within the Hamlet, including a sidewalk on Wilton Rd to St. Patrick’s School, SIGNAGE We need to consider signage for local traffic and also directional/wayfinding signage for facilities like the cemetery, etc. SPEED ZONES Staff will undertake a review of the limits of existing speed zones leading into and out of the Hamlet. RIGHT TURN LANES Right turn lanes need to be incorporated, where possible, into the new signalized intersection. PARADES It is recognized that the Santa Claus and Canada Day parades will have their routes altered as a result of the new intersection. SAFETY Safety needs to be an overarching consideration in the design of any improvements to the existing intersection. The responses to these issues will be posted on the Township’s website and circulated to the local newspapers.

FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. Submitted/approved by: Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

Page 135 of 154

INFORMATION REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

March 31, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

April 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Contract No. 2016-11 – South Frontenac, North Frontenac and Frontenac Islands Pavement Marking Program BACKGROUND: A one year joint Pavement Marking Tender, with an optional two year extension, was prepared for the Townships of South and North Frontenac, and Frontenac Islands. This tender closed on March 23rd, 2016. Three bids were submitted. The objective of a joint tender for Pavement Marking is to draw lower unit costs from higher quantities. South Frontenac represents Section ‘A’, North Frontenac represents Section ‘B’, and Frontenac Islands represents Section ‘C’ of the tender. The Public Works Departments of each South, North, and Frontenac Islands took this opportunity to joint tender given that the terms of contract for each Municipality had come to an end. The results in ascending order, before HST, are as follows: Contractor

Section ‘A’

Section ‘B’

Section ‘C’

Total Price

R&N Maintenance $133,525.00 $19,470.00

$6,815.00

$159,810.00

Trillium Pavement Marking

$133,800.00 $19,998.00

$6,750.50

$160,548.50

A&A Asphalt

$153,780.00 $23,148.00

$14,765.00

$191,693.00

The submission of the lowest bidder has been evaluated and is found to be accurate and complete. R&N Maintenance is a reputable contractor for Line Painting providing this service to other Municipalities across Ontario. References from Bruce County, Grey County, and the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville have been contacted and all seem satisfied with the service provided by R&N Maintenance. For these reasons, and also because their price was $738.50 lower than the second lowest bid from Trillium Pavement Markings staff have awarded the contract to R&N Maintenance for Tender No. 2016-11, Section ‘A’ in the amount of $133,525.00 plus HST. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An amount of $150,000.00 has been budgeted in the 2016 Operating Budget for South Frontenac’s Traffic Control Marking. This amount includes painting a centreline on all of our hard surfaced roads. The purpose of this is to provide another level of safety for motorists on local roads that typically did not have a centreline. Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

David Holliday, C.E.T. Area Supervisor

Page 136 of 154

From: Northway Home Hardware northway@kingston.net Date: March 28, 2016 at 9:58:17 AM EDT To: rvandewal@southfrontenac.net Subject: re: community development Hi Ron: As you probably know by now the LCBO/Beer Store has closed next door. It has been a vital part of our community for the last few years and has helped to make another reason to stop in Inverary. We were, thanks to the assistance of our local council, successful in having the proposed solar project cancelled which makes any future development in our community worthwhile. Retention of the beer store would be a huge benefit to our whole community. As Mayor of South Frontenac, would you be willing to contact the LCBO and give them some input as to the proposed growth and potential in this area. They are apparently looking at feasibility of this location since the new store was built in north Kingston, however, they do not understand the culture of the rural areas and the fact that residents are not about to go into Kingston. We have been in contact with them and have advised that we have indeed rented the adjacent space and are willing and able to take over immediately, if approved. I have spoken to Ron Sleeth and Norm Roberts who are also on board with attempting to retain the business here in South Frontenac and are willing to meet with you and the LCBO to discuss. Thank you Reta Azulay Dealer/Owner Northway Home Hardware Inverary, Ontario

Page 137 of 154

IFrom: Delan Jinapriya [mailto:djinapriya@galeneyecentre.com] Sent: March-30-16 12:42 AM To: Angela Maddocks Cc: Delan Jinapriya Subject: Concern over a proposed bylaw change by the Planning Department

Hello, Thank you in advance for taking the time to read this message. I would like to express my concern over the recommended removal of s.5.11 and a change to s.5.10.2 of the SF Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw. I am a property owner at 4508 Red Maple Lane on Loughborough Lake and the current president of the Red Maple Lane Property Association. These proposed bylaw changes affect all 20 properties on our lane. It will adversely affect all of our property values and increase the bureaucracy required to maintain structures that have been grandfathered in prior to the implementation of the current value system of the Planning Department. I am troubled by the fact that I am hearing of this proposed bylaw change by word of mouth and not directly from the City. A change of this significance requires that all property owners affected be notified and have ample time to respond and attend a council meeting where they can voice any opinions (whether for or against). This has not been done. For those of us with waterfront properties, sustainable, respectful waterfront living is what we should be striving for. This would allow humans to enjoy the environment and use it while being responsible with it. The proposed changes and some of the changes that have come before it are too extreme a stance and do not embody people embracing the lake front. The Planning Office should put forward suggestions that guide waterfront property owners on best practices for waterfront development rather than not allow the development of the waterfront at all. There will be a petition that our Lane Association members will be signing and we will present this to you. However, it is only fair that we have enough time to discuss this proposed bylaw change and have time for our Lane members to meet. In the interim please take this message as my strong opposition to the proposed by law changes. Sincerely, Delan Jinapriya D Jinapriya BSc, MD, FRCSC Assistant Professor, Queen’s University, Department of Ophthalmology Medical Director Galen Eye Centre t 613.507.4800 f 613.507.4801

www.galeneyecentre.com

Page 138 of 154

From: Dan Floyd danfloyd09@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:56 PM To: lakevalley@kos.net; 7846elbe@gmail.com; markschjerning@kos.net; Wayne Orr Subject: Proposed Changes to South Frontenac Planning Department bylaws - Lake Front Properties

To the powers that be, As a lake front property owner I am very concerned with what I have read in the attached email chain. It is disconcerting that there is an attempt at further restrictions on the up keep of waterfront properties without consultation to those that may be negatively be impacted. I’m all for protecting the environment but we need ensure that the bylaws actually have a positive impact on the environment. The idea of having a “green belt” at the 100’ mark is admirable but for most of the existing home is just not reasonable. That is why they have been “grand fathered in”. The processes and costs associated with rebuilding/renovating lake front properties are already onerous enough. If you implement further bylaws that further impede eco-friendly lakefront development this will result in frustrated property owners not to mention the devaluation of their properties in terms of resell value. My wife and I purchased our property knowing that the existing dwelling was in dire need of major renovations. We were told by our realtor as well as friends on the the lake that we could renovate as long as we followed municipal planning bylaws that were considered restrictive but not unreasonable as they were put in place to protect the lake environment. I visited the SF planning department with my draft plans to see if they were permittable. The meeting went well and we now hope to move forward with the renovation. Unfortunately I have had conversations with property owners as well as professionals in the land development business that the SF planning department has a reputation as being unreasonable (as compared with other jurisdictions).It goes without saying that if this is the case than it is unacceptable. We need to work together in order to have sustainable eco-friendly development. We as property owners have a right to maintain and improve our homes just like everyone else in this great province and country of ours. We have worked long and hard and have paid more than our fair share of taxes to own these properties. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns. Daniel Floyd 4464 Red Maple Lane Inverary, ON A frustrated property owner.

Page 139 of 154

Subject: FW: Letter of Concern: March 2016 Settlement Agreements on Johnston Point

County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0 and, Township of South Frontenac 4432 George St., Box 100, Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 Dear Warden, Mayor and Councillors. It is with profound disappointment that we received the County council’s March 16th position on Johnston Point and saw it presented to the broader public in the Kingston WhigStandard. http://www.thewhig.com/2016/03/16/county-council-oks-disputed-condo-project Ever more so, followed four days later by media attention drawing us towards ‘Preserving Wetland’. http://www.thewhig.com/2016/03/20/preserving-wetlands

The bold media headline - “County approves condo project” – underscores our municipality’s lack of understanding of the ‘undeveloped’ value of this wetland and the ecosystem services it provides, and further masks its lack of accountability, clarity and transparency towards this plan of Condominium Development and of Applewood Estates, also by Magenta Corp. and in the same wetland complex. These two developments together will constitute an estimated 12% increase in lots in Loughborough Lake’s East Basin, alarmingly concentrated in an area with Environmental Protection designation for the many natural heritage features it encompasses Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW), Species at Risk (SAR), Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) and the Frontenac Arch UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve.

What has not been made clear to the public is the fact that the County did not make a decision on Johnston Point. Following suit of Township council on March 1st, County council on March 16th simply voted to support this plan as their legal position in front of the April 4th OMB hearing. Without actually making a ‘decision’ on Johnston Point, our community has effectively been shut out of that process. It strips us of the opportunity to file a separate appeal to dispute the actual ‘approval’ of Johnston Point. The ‘decision’ by the OMB following the April 4th hearing is final and cannot be reversed (other than through a very unlikely OMB decision to send the matter back to the municipality). A mere three weeks before the hearing we learned the County’s position on Johnston Point, which is not to approve or deny this Plan of Condominium, yet with their legal stance, supporting the settlement agreement to lend public “approve condo project” impression. Our Township’s natural heritage that has, for the last two years, been our community struggle to preserve through working in partnership with our municipality – in the end feels to us like a lawyer’s game lake residents cannot afford to play in. In the County’s haste to pass motion of approval on Johnston Point at their March 16th council meeting, there was not a single response from councillors to Matt Rennie’s presentation documenting clear violations and non-compliances with the Provincial Policy Statement and Township and County Official Plans, nor was he given the opportunity to field his list of questions following the planners presentation as promised.

This letter of endorsement is a call for an explanation from Township and County councillors, their reasoning for approving the settlement conditions at such a late stage in their decision process, for it was our understanding that on December 1st 2015, Township councilors voted AGAINST the Conditions of Draft Plan Approval for Johnston Point in keeping with:

Page 140 of 154

  1. the Township’s peer review of the EIA and a Wetland Evaluation that clearly state that they do not “sufficiently demonstrate there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions on the subject property as per the requirements of the Provincial Policy Statement”.
  2. a notice from the MNRF dated October 9, 2015 stating that there is “a strong possibility that the proposed condominium development will impact species at risk and their habitat.”
  3. the disclosure by the CRCA delegation to council January 12, 2016, that while this wetland is under the jurisdiction of the CRCA, they cannot enforce the existing environmental regulations and made it clear that the responsibilities to enforce the conditions of draft plan would fall to the Township.
  4. the disclosure from the Township’s CAO in the March 1st, 2016 planning report for the approval of the Applewood agreement that “the Township does not have the processes or staffing capacity in place to effectively manage the agreement”.

We look forward to your response and as we endeavor to ‘preserve wetlands’, we hope to see the Township and County planning staff and councillors at the very timely wetland seminar this Thursday March 31 at the Invista Community Centre 1350 Gardiners Road, Kingston,by the Frontenac Stewardship Foundation . Called ‘Get your Feet Wet: Understanding our Wetlands’, it is a golden opportunity to understand together, more thoroughly our concerns for Johnston Point and respond to them accordingly at the upcoming OMB hearing on Johnston Point.

Respectfully, Meela Melnik-Proud and Matt Rennie Endorsements Anne Fisher Diane Koen Nona Mariotti Roel Vertegaal George Proud Clayton Potts Evonne Potts Ed Koen Erin Wicklam Marc Hiemstra Ann Robinson Don Maxwell Rachael Melnik-Proud Mike Koen Susan Sutherland Ken Burns Tasha Proud Sharon Dunn Jan Fox Dan Floyd Delina Campbell Melo Lynn DeGeer-Ostrom Chelsea McCallum

Page 141 of 154

Erin Malcolm-Kerr Eliot Stephens Maria G. Dipillo Jeff Kleinlagel Joe Pater Rick Bell Carolyn Tanner Kevin Weaver Chris Hammer Susan Nobes Tindal Jennifer Mallon Beth Pater Jan Wood Larry Wood Sue Peters Jeff Peters Andrea Cumpson Orrie Cumpson Sally Blasko Charlie Cumpson Hailey Cumpson Ray Rennie Karl Hammer Helen Bartsch Keith Bartsch Shane Peters

Page 142 of 154

Lakeshore

TOWN OF LAKESHORE

’””’’

Belle River, ON NOR 1A0

March 11, 2016 Via Email To: All Municipalities in the Province of Ontario

RE: ONTARIO MUNICIPALBOARD SIMPLIFIEDPROCESS Please find attached the resolution approved by the Council of the Town of Lakeshore at their Regular Council meeting held on March 8, 2016

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly,

Mary Masse Clerk

Attachment: Resolution of Lakeshore Council MM/km

Ph: 519-728-2700 Fax: 519-728-9530 Toll: 1-877-249-3367

www.lakeshore.ca

Page 143 of 154

Lokeshore

TOWN OF LAKESHORE 419 Notre Dame St. Beile River, ON NOR 1A0

Councillor Wilder moved and Councillor McKinleyseconded: WHEREAS municipalities in Ontario invest a significant amount of time and resources into developing and updating their Official Plan; and

WHEREAS the Official Plan of a municipality in Ontario, is ultimately reviewed and approved by the Province of Ontario; and WHEREAS it is within the legislative purview of a Municipal Council to approve Official Plan amendments or Zoning By-law changes that better the community or fit within the vision of their Official Plan; and WHEREAS it is also within the legislative purview of a Municipal Council to deny Official Plan amendments or Zoning By—lawchanges that do not better the community or do not fit within the vision of their Official Plan; and

WHEREAS planning decisions of a Municipal Council may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board ( “OMB” , an unelected, appointed body that is not accountable to the taxpayers of that municipality; and WHEREAS there is a significant expenditure of time and resources associated with defending decisions of a Municipal Council to the OMB, the full cost of which is borne by that municipality and ultimately the taxpayers of that municipality; NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT that the Government of Ontario be requested to establish a simplified process within the OMB (“OMB Simplified Process” , whereby planning decisions of a Municipal Council, made on the basis of upholding their Official Plan, may be appealed at no cost to that municipality; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT that the Government of Ontario be requested to require the OMB to uphold any planning decisions of a Municipal Council, if they are made on the basis of upholding their Official Plan, unless through the OMB Simplified Process, they are

Ph: 519-728-2700 Fax: 519-728-9530 Toll: 1-877-249-3367 wvvw.|akeshore.ca

Page 144 of 154

found to be contrary and

to the processes

and rules set out in legislation;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this Motion be sent to the Honourable Kathleen Wynne, Premier of Ontario, the Honourable Ted McMeekin, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Honourable Patrick Brown, Leader of the Progressive Conservative Party, the Honourable Andrea Horwath, Leader of the New Democratic Party, and all MPPs in the Province of Ontario; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this Motion be sent to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) and all Ontario municipalities for their consideration. Motion Carried Unanimously

Page 145 of 154

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC P.O. Box 100 4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario, K0H 2T0

Telephone 376-3027 / 1-800-559-5862 FAX (613) 376-6657 E-mail: rvandewal@southfrontenac.net

March 23, 2016 Honourable Kathleen Wynne Premier of Ontario Room 281 111 Wellesley Street West Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A1 Dear Premier: The Council of the Township wishes to express its frustration with the awarding of the large solar projects by the IESO earlier this month. As a Council we invested resources in facilitating and ultimately endorsing two large scale solar projects within our community. Similarly we spent considerable time considering and ultimately rejecting another proposal. We had staff spend many hours meeting with proponents to negotiate community benefit agreements that would provide much needed funding to our municipality for the two projects where there was Council and community support. It is extremely disappointing to have contracts awarded in municipalities where there was no municipal support. This behaviour at the provincial level minimizes the municipality’s negotiating power and undermines Council’s decisions. We remain open to considering large scale solar proposals in the future that make sense for South Frontenac, however we also expect the IESO and the Provincial government to honour and respect the decisions of municipalities. Yours truly

Ron Vandewal RV:am cc IESO Patrick Brown, Leader of the Ontario PC Party Andrea Horwath, Leader of the Ontario NDP

Page 146 of 154 Ministry of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade

Ministère des Affaires civiques, de l’Immigration et du Commerce international

Minister

Ministre

th

6 Floor 400 University Avenue Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tel.: (416) 325-6200 Fax: (416) 325-6195

e

6 étage 400, avenue University Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tél.: (416) 325-6200 Téléc.: (416) 325-6195

March 2016 Dear Friends, It is my pleasure to invite you to submit a nomination for the Lincoln M. Alexander Award. Each year, the program recognizes up to three (3) youth who have demonstrated exemplary leadership in contributing to the elimination of racial discrimination in Ontario. Recipients will receive a cash prize of $5,000 and a framed certificate. To make a nomination:

  1. Visit ontario.ca/honoursandawards and click on the Lincoln M. Alexander Award link.
  2. Download the appropriate PDF nomination form.
  3. Read the eligibility criteria and instructions carefully.
  4. Fill out the form and submit it with your supporting material. Instructions for submitting your package can be found on the website.

The deadline for nominations is May 31, 2016

Please take this opportunity to acknowledge a young person from your school or community who has made an important contribution to eliminating racial discrimination in Ontario. If you have questions or require a copy of the nomination form to be mailed to you, please send an email to ontariohonoursandawards@ontario.ca or call 416 314-7526, toll free 1 877 832-8622 or TTY 416 327-2391. Thank you for taking the time to consider a deserving young Ontarian for the Lincoln M. Alexander Award. Yours truly,

Michael Chan Minister

Page 147 of 154 Ministry of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade

Ministère des Affaires civiques, de l’Immigration et du Commerce international

Minister

Ministre

th

6 Floor 400 University Avenue Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tel.: (416) 325-6200 Fax: (416) 325-6195

e

6 étage 400, avenue University Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tél.: (416) 325-6200 Téléc.: (416) 325-6195

Mars 2016 Madame, Monsieur, J’ai le plaisir de vous inviter à présenter une candidature au Prix Lincoln M. Alexander. Chaque année, le programme rend hommage à trois (3) jeunes qui ont fait preuve de leadership exemplaire dans leurs efforts visant l’éradication de la discrimination raciale en Ontario. Les récipiendaires recevront un prix de 5 000 $ et un certificat encadré. Pour présenter une candidature :

  1. Rendez-vous sur le site www.ontario.ca/distinctionsetprix et cliquez sur le lien du Prix Lincoln M. Alexander.
  2. Téléchargez la version PDF appropriée du formulaire de mise en candidature.
  3. Lisez attentivement les critères d’admissibilité et les instructions.
  4. Remplissez le formulaire et soumettez-le avec vos documents d’appui. Les instructions sur la façon de présenter vos documents sont fournies sur le site Web.

La date limite pour la présentation des candidatures est le 31 mai 2016. N’hésitez pas à profiter de cette occasion pour reconnaître un jeune de votre école ou de votre collectivité qui a fait une contribution importante à l’éradication de la discrimination raciale en Ontario. Pour toute question ou si vous avez besoin qu’un exemplaire du formulaire de mise en candidature vous soit envoyé par la poste, veuillez faire parvenir un courriel à ontariohonoursandawards@ontario.ca ou téléphonez au 416 314-7526, sans frais 1 877 832-8622 ou ATS 416 327-2391. Je vous remercie de prendre le temps d’envisager la candidature d’une jeune ontarienne ou d’un jeune ontarien méritoire au Prix Lincoln M. Alexander. Je vous prie d’agréer mes salutations cordiales. Le ministre,

Michael Chan

Page 148 of 154

From: John Williamson [mailto:willj@kos.net] Sent: March-31-16 10:23 PM To: Lindsay Mills Subject: Fw: Collins Lake subdivision

Lindsay Further to our phone call I have attached a copy of the letter I sent to the County and their reply. As I said in it I am neither supportive of this subdivision nor opposed but need more information. I am asking that I be kept informed of future decisions and meetings so my options are kept open. I plan on attending Tuesday`s meeting. Thanks for your cooperation. John Williamson 4145 Holmes Rd, RR/1 Inverary, K0H1X0 613-353-7335

Page 149 of 154

Angela Maddocks From: Sent: To:

John Williamson willj@kos.net

Subject:

Re: Collins Lake subdivision

March-31-16 10:12 PM JoeGallivan

Thanks Joe. I plan on attending the meeting on Tuesday. I shall look at the site you provided and may have more questions following that. John From: Joe Gallivan

Sent: Thursday/ March 31, 2016 10:45 AM To: wilh@)kos.net

Cc: Jannette Amini: Reid Shepherd Subject: RE: Collins Lake subdivision Dear Mr. Williamson,

Thank you for writing to our office. I want to advise you that as part of this planning review for the proposed Collins Lake subdivision the applicant is required to provide a variety of impact studies, including hydrogeological analysis for new wells.

We have set up a website that lists all information that has been received for the application, as well as any responses we receive from agencies such as the KFLA Health Unit. This site will be updated on a regular basis:

httDS://drive.aooQle.com/folderview?id=OB7v5hKv9tkKVemtQbFMvQiNuUms&usD=sharina

A Public Meeting will be held on behalf of the County by South Frontenac Township next Tuesday. April 5th at 7:00 p.m. at the Township office in Sydenham. You are welcome to attend and provide any comments you have at this time. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Thank you.

Joe Gallivan MCIP

Director of Planning and Economic Development County of Frontenac 2069 Battersea Road GlenburnieON KOH 1 SO

phone 613.548.9400 extension 350 fax613.548.8460

email iaallivan^frontenaccountv.ca

Page 150 of 154 –Original Message-From: infoOiesolutionseroup.ca fmailto:info@esolutionsRrouD.ca] On Behalf Of wiNJ^kosjiet Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 7:57 AM To: Joe Gallivan <JGallivan@)FRONTENACCOUNTY.CA>

Subject: Collins Lake subdivision

Joe/Reid: I am a nearby farmer and landowner and have concerns with this proposal. At this time I am neither opposed or

supportive but concerned. It adds a lot of private wells to an area already having many with the strip development and Lyons Landing subdivision. Were there water studies done recently? Traffic studies on the bad corner at Holmes and Perth Rd? Hamlets in

South Frontenac are noted for bad water and this in essence will create another hamlet. If a municipal well was going to be put in to serve the subdivision a lot of studies would be required; similar studies should be done to ensure the safety of the residents. This

notice is to keep my options open for future information/hea rings and notices as per the ad. John Williamson; 4145 Holmes Rd; RR#1 Inverary KOH1XO 613-353-7335

Origin: httD://www.frontenaccounty.ca/en/corporate/landuseplanninE.asD

This email was sent to you by willi@kos.net through httD://www.frontenaccountv.ca/.

Think about our environment. Print only if necessary.

Confidential:Thisemailand any attachments transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the email immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosing, copying, distributing or using the content of this transmission is strictly prohibited.

2

Page 151 of 154

From: Linda Phibbs [mailto:lindafrank123@outlook.com] Sent: March-31-16 6:00 PM To: Lindsay Mills Subject:

In response to the letter regarding the public meeting to be held April 5th 2016 . I am concerned about the amount of traffic and the effect it will have on our wells.

Thank you Sincerely Linda Phibbs 3178 lakefield Dr inverary ont ..

Page 152 of 154

From: alerwin [mailto:alerwin@xplornet.ca] Sent: April-01-16 9:54 AM To: Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net; rshepherd@frontenaccounty.ca; ‘Ross Sutherland’ 7846elbe@gmail.com Subject: Input for public meeting re Proposed Phase I Collins Lake Subdivision To:

Reid Shepherd, Frontenac County Planner Wayne Orr, Township CAO Ross Sutherland, SF Township Councillor

Re:

Proposal for Phase I Collins Lake Subdivision

Good day, I am a SF Township resident. This e-mail contains my comments about the proposed 51-lot Phase I Collins Lake Subdivision that will be discussed at the Public Meeting on Tuesday April 5 2016. THANK YOU to the Planner for creating 2 folders containing the application documents and agency comments for this proposal. This is a real help to residents who are not able to go to the Township Office during business hours to view hardcopies. Good Development should preserve as much of our Natural Heritage as possible, and maintain or enhance the quality of life for existing residents. On that basis, I have some concerns after reviewing the files

  1. The planning report states that “there will be no negative impacts to the natural heritage system as a result of the development since appropriate setbacks and mitigation measures will be implemented”. This is because they will implement the recommendations from the Environmental Impact Assessment. These are -to restrict clearing from the back 40m of lots 8 to 11 for amphibian breeding (there is a wet area behind these lots) -to restrict tree clearing and septic building on lots 25-31 to prevent intrusion into the steep slopes next to Collins Lake i.e. no forest clearing within 10m of the wooded slope (where EIA found woodland with significant character and function; it contains a large proportion of older trees, and protects the provincially designated wetland) -setbacks at least 30m from watercourse on western edge (small creek that empties into Collins Lake) -clear land outside of Apr-Jul breeding season These measures will be difficult to enforce during construction and more so after the homes are sold. How will the woodlands, which were found to be significant in some aspects, be protected in a sustainable fashion so that they continue to serve as the important buffer to the Environmentally Sensitive Wetland on the shore? This plan meets the bare minimum of 120m setback of development from a provincially designated wetland (shore of Collins Lake). In most wetlands the lifecycle of much wildlife extends

Page 153 of 154

beyond the 120m limit. It is important to prevent disturbance of the land in this buffer during construction or final use. 2) The EXP hydrogeology report states there is sufficient quantity and quality of water. The Malroz peer review comes to a different conclusion, i.e. that the data show that the aquifer is susceptible to mining of ground water and interference with existing or future groundwater users is likely. Also that the quality and quantity of the water in the test wells does not support the servicing of 51 lots by private individual services. This conclusion comes from the fact that several of the 8 test wells did not recover after pumping tests and the presence of coliforms including e. coli in test wells. What will be the cumulative effect of 51 wells? Development should not take place until it can be shown that the quality and quantity of water for existing users in the subdivisions east of Lakefield will not be impacted. If this can be done, data must be gathered to show what number of new lots (with 4 bedroom homes) can be supported by private wells and development limited to that number, or an alternative water supply provided. 3) Phase I contains nearly as many lots as the entire set of subdivisions east of Lakefield, which took more than 20 years to grow to its current size. The subdivision is outside of any designated Settlement Area, yet the applicant is requesting relief from the 76m minimum frontage for rural lots in the Official Plan, in some lots down nearly 35% to 55m. What is the exceptional value or need for this subdivision such that the frontages should be reduced? Is this fair to residents of existing subdivisions just east, who bought their properties believing that the Official Plan would be enforced? 4) The Planning Justification report states that the plan contains “only 1 acre of parkland, but any deficiency in parkland will be addressed in future phases”. The timing of future development is uncertain. Phase I should be constructed to comply with County and Township policies. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on this proposal. Please let me know how to ensure these comments have been received and recorded. You can contact me by replying to this e-mail Alex Simmons

Page 154 of 154

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2016-26 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.

The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of April 5th, 2016 be confirmed.

Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk-Administrator of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed.

This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 5th day of April, 2016. Read a first and second time this 5th day of April, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this 5th day of April, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Help support independent journalism
If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.
Buy Me a Coffee