Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: July 5, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2016/Council Meeting - 05 Jul 2016 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Tuesday, July 5, 2016 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

a)

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Scheduled Closed Session- n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

a)

Darren Carl and Mark Feenstra, Canadian Solar, re: Next Round of LRP

4 - 14

b)

Mike Keene, re: Stricelj Rezoning

15 - 30

Public Meeting

a)

Resolution

b)

Review of Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment , Part Lot 20, Concession IX, Storrington

31 - 70

c)

Review of Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 11, Concession 1, Storrington

71 - 83

Approval of Minutes

a)

Minutes of the June 21, 2016 Council meeting

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Request for permission to hold a Special Event Concert on Part Lot 13 Concession VII, Storrington District Vezeau

91 - 93

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Site Plan Agreement in Part of Lot 2, Concession IV, Loughborough - Silver

94 - 98

c)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Young

• Leland Road Legal Fees

99

d)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion Hartington Subdivision

100

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Tim Laprade, Arena and Recreation Supervisor, re: Ontario East

84 - 90

101 103

Page 1 of 189

Regional Agility Competition Noise and Camping Exemptions b)

Tim Laprade, Arena and Recreation Supervisor, re: Permission to Serve Alcohol at the Stantive Technologies Staff BBQ

104 106

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Purchase of AVL from Tyroute Communications

107 108

d)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: 2017 Budget Cycle

109

e)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Verona Medical Lease

110

f)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Seniors Housing

111

Committee Meeting Minutes

a)

Loughborough District Canada Day Committee meeting of June 9, 2016

112

b)

Portland District Recreation Committee meeting of May 30, 2016

113

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-41 - Con I, Part Lot 11, Storrington -Tripp

114 116

b)

By-law 2016-42 - Con IX, Part Lot 20, Storrington - Stricelj

117 118

c)

By-law 2016-43 - Site Plan Agreement - Silver

119 146

Reports for Information

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing

147 162

b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Annual Repayment Limit in respect to long-term debt and financial obligations

163 165

c)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Changes to Development Charges reporting requirements

166 167

d)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: 2016 Student Funding

168

e)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: PW-2016-13 Tender to Replace Salmon Lake Road culvert

169

Information Items

a)

Letter to Prime Minister Trudeau, re: Prison Farms (from June 21 Council Resolution)

170

Page 2 of 189

b)

Carina Promm, Ernestown Secondary School, re: Thanks to Planning Department staff

171

c)

Mayor Ron Higgins, Township of North Frontenac, re: Requesting Support with regards to responding to Medical Calls

172

d)

Jim Cassimatis, Assistant Deputy Minister, MMAH re: Proposed Amendments to the Residential Tenancies Act

173 188

Notice of Motions

Announcements

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-44

Adjournment

a)

Resolution

189

Page 3 of 189

The Super Highway to Grid Parity

Township of South Frontenac Council Delegation Meeting – IESO LRP II

Page 4 of 189

July 5, 2016

Introductions

Canadian Solar Solutions Inc. : 

Mark Feenstra – Sr. Manager, Project Development, Canada Region



Darren Carl – Business Development Associate

Suncor Energy Products Inc.: 

Chris Scott – Senior Engineer, Renewable Energy

Page 5 of 189

2

Suncor Energy Products Inc.

Suncor Energy is Canada’s leading integrated energy company. Suncor’s operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Developing renewable energy is part of Suncor’s longstanding climate change action plan.

To foster relationships with stakeholders, Suncor has developed a set of guiding principles for our engagement efforts: Respect Responsibility Responsiveness Transparency Timeliness Mutual Benefit

Suncor’s vision is to be trusted stewards of valuable natural resources:

Guided by our values, we will lead the way to deliver economic prosperity, improved social Page 6 of 189

well-being and a healthy environment for today and tomorrow. 3

Canadian Solar Solutions Inc.

Founded in 2001 in Canada, Canadian Solar is one of the world’s largest and foremost solar power companies. As a leading manufacturer of solar photovoltaic modules and a provider of solar energy solutions, Canadian Solar has a geographically diversified pipeline of utility-scale power projects. In the past 14 years, Canadian Solar has successfully deployed over 14 GW of premium quality modules in over 70 countries around the world. Furthermore, Canadian Solar is one of the most bankable companies in the world, having been publically listed on NASDAQ since 2006.

We offer our customers the opportunity to invest in utility-scale solar power plants. With a successful track record developing, engineering, constructing and connecting over 1.8-gigawatts (GW), Canadian Solar stands out as one of the leading solar developers globally. Companies like BlackRock, Samsung and TransCanada are among our list of customers that rely on us to deliver reliable solar solutions. In addition, we help boost the social responsibility profile of any portfolio providing advanced solar solutions that enable sustainable development worldwide.

Page 7 of 189

4

Why are we back?

Large Renewable Procurement I (LRP I) Debrief 

LRP II Kick Off 

An additional 250 MW of ground mounted solar offered by the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO).



LRP III cancelled.

Discussions with the public regarding Collins Lake Solar 

Talk with the community about updating the project

Future Development Opportunities 

Page 8 of 189

Acknowledge concerns from the LRP I process and Collins Lake Solar.

Talk with the Township and public about additional locations which are suitable for solar development

Provide a more Transparent and Open Approach to Public Consultation

5

IESO LRP II Timeline and Potential Project Schedule LRP I Contract Award Offers Final LRP II Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to be issued LRP II RFQ Opens Final LRP II Request for Proposals (RFP) to be issued LRP II RFP Submission Deadline LRP II RFP Contract Offers – 250 MW (Ground mount solar)

March 10, 2016 August 2016 Q4 2016 Q2 2017 Q3-Q4 2017 May 2018

Page 9 of 189

6

Collins Lake Solar LP Project Details

Project Location

Located on two properties south of the community of Inverary

Land Agreement(s) (acres)

Lease Agreements (~100 acres project area)

Project Size

13 MW

Property Zoning

Rural

Canada Land Inventory

Class 4 Soils

Project Updates

Open to discussions on updates to the project to accommodate public concerns or new locations

Page 10 of 189

7

Collins Lake Solar Project

Page 11 of 189

8

Community Consultation Your feedback is important. Below is a list of concerns raised during the LRP 1 Process: Visual impact

Reduce visual impacts of project by creating Visual Impact Assessments with buffer plans and setbacks.

Distance to Inverary

Eastern project property very close to the community of Inverary and future development opportunities. Want to work with the Township and public on alternatives for this property.

Construction impacts

Seeking an agreement with the Township of South Frontenac to address Storm Water, Road Impacts, and other operational concern. Maintaining the integrity of Davidson Side Road a priority.

Environmental concerns

Continue to work with landowners to discuss environmental concerns and the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) process

Page 12 of 189

9

Next Steps

Re-Introduce ourselves to the community

Discussions with the community about the Collins Lake Solar project

Meet with the Township about other potential opportunities

Consultation to begin well in advance of the LRP II program opening for submissions

Page 13 of 189

10

The Super Highway to Grid Parity

Thank you Q&A

Page 14 of 189

1610 DON MOORE LANE Application for: Zoning By-Law Amendment

Page 15 of 189

Applicant: Don Stricelj

Context ƒ0.6 ha (1.5 ac) property on Dog Lake ƒAccess from Don Moore Lane ƒSurrounded by waterfront residential ƒThe Site was developed in a previous era, before the 30m setback came into effect Page 16 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Context

Proposal ƒ2nd Storey addition on water side (above existing structure) ƒRear addition with carport ƒSite improvements (septic, runoff, OBC, naturalize gravel patch) Page 17 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Proposal

2nd Storey Addition ƒPylon foundation replaced ƒBuilt over existing footprint ƒUses natural materials

Addition damaged by storm

ƒDoes not further encroach on water ƒConstructed without approval over existing footprint ƒEvaluated in terms of planning merits New 2nd storey addition Page 18 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | 2nd Storey Addition

Rear Addition ƒ1 ½ storey addition at rear with attached carport

Addition damaged by storm

New 2nd storey addition Page 19 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | 2nd Storey Addition

Proposed Improvements

ƒNew tertiary septic system to be located outside of 30m water setback ƒRunoff redirected away from lake ƒBring old cottage up to OBC standards ƒNaturalize gravel area Page 20 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Proposal

Supporting Studies ƒEnvironmental Site Evaluation ƒNo impact from 2nd storey addition since constructed on existing footprint ƒNo existing natural cover in area proposed for 1½ addition, although one young White Pine tree will be relocated ƒNet benefit due to new septic system ƒRain gutters to drain toward rear of lot

ƒSlope Stability Study ƒNo concerns ƒDrainage recommended away from lake Page 21 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Supporting Studies

South Frontenac Official Plan ƒDevelopment in Rural area is to be consistent with maintaining its rural, natural heritage and cultural landscape. ƒEnvironmental Protection Policies [5.2.7(b)] require that proposals for additions to structures within the 30m setback shall be evaluated on the following:

Page 22 of 189

1. GFA, Building Footprint and Lot Coverage
2. Proximity of dwelling to high water mark
3. Capacity of lot to accommodate new development farther from the water

1610 Don Moore Lane | SF Official Plan

Official Plan – 3 Criteria #1: Is it too big? (Lot Coverage, GFA, Footprint) ƒZoning by-law permits 10% coverage (5% for primary, 5% for accessory) ƒProposed lot coverage for entire site is 4.5% ƒPrimary structure: 2.7% ƒAccessory structures: 1.8%

ƒLot occupancy (adding the floor space together) will increase from 2.5% to 4.0% for the main dwelling Page 23 of 189

ƒOverall footprint will only increase by 36 m2 (388 sq ft) 1610 Don Moore Lane | Official Plan – 3 Criteria

Page 24 of 189

Official Plan – 3 Criteria #2: Proximity of dwelling to high water mark ƒExisting deck is 6.3m from high water mark ƒMain dwelling is +/- 9m from high water mark ƒVertical drop from high water mark to water’s edge provides further 6m of separation ƒ2nd storey addition over existing footprint ƒRear, 1½ storey addition will extend away from water Page 25 of 189

ƒSite Plan Control as additional tool 1610 Don Moore Lane | Official Plan – 3 Criteria

Official Plan – 3 Criteria #3: Capacity of lot to accommodate new development farther from the water ƒShape and layout provides limited building envelope ƒTerrain further limits development ƒMoving the building to the 30 m setback constitutes undue hardship

Page 26 of 189

ƒMitigate impacts by avoiding further encroachment, building addition as far from lake as possible, installing new septic system outside 30m setback

1610 Don Moore Lane |Official Plan – 3 Criteria

Official Plan – 3 Criteria

Page 27 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Official Plan – 3 Criteria

Zoning By-law Amendment ƒAccording to MMAH, when considering a zoning bylaw amendment, council is required to evaluate the application against the following criteria: ƒConformity with the official plan and compatibility with adjacent uses of land ƒSuitability of the land for the proposed purpose ƒAdequacy of access, water supply, sewage disposal ƒRisk of flooding Page 28 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Zoning By-law

Zoning By-law Amendment RLSW-X (a)The minimum required setback from the highwater mark shall be 6.0 m for the deck and 8.5 m for the dwelling; (b)The minimum required setback from the top of bank shall be 1.0 m for the deck and 6.0 m for the dwelling.

Page 29 of 189

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5.10.2, the maximum permitted gross floor area (including decks) of the principal dwelling shall be 255 square metres. 1610 Don Moore Lane | Zoning By-law

Summary ƒ Existing cottage is within the 30m setback ƒ New additions do not further encroach on water setback ƒ Site alterations are proposed that provide a net benefit ƒ ƒ ƒ

New septic system and location outside of 30m setback Redirect gutters to rear of property Site Plan Control is recommended to re-naturalize a portion of the graveled parking area

ƒ Meets the 3 criteria established in the South Frontenac OP ƒ No environmental concerns from an ecological or slope stability perspective ƒ Regardless of the construction that has already taken place, on its planning merits, this proposal represents good planning Page 30 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane | Summary

Staff Report Public Meeting Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: July 5, 2016 Report Dated: June 30, 2016

Planning Department

File No. Z-16/09

Subject: Public Meeting for Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 20, Concession IX, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Stricelj

Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is to deny a zoning amendment application that would apply a special zoning to a property at Dog Lake to permit a two storey addition to an existing legal non-complying cottage. The addition is already illegally constructed and is located approximately 5.5 metres (18 feet) from the lake. The amendment would also permit an addition to the non-water side of the building. The zoning by-law presently requires new development to be located 30 metres (98.4 feet) from the lake.

Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring forward to Council an application, to amend the Township of South Frontenac Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 to apply to an existing waterfront property at Dog Lake. The Council meeting will also constitute a public meeting as required under the Planning Act wherein representation will be received from any concerned property-owner or agency. The report includes a number of attachments including a zoning by-law amendment for Council’s reference.

Background The owner of property at 1610 Don Moore Lane has applied to amend the Township’s Comprehensive Zoning By-law to permit a proposed new addition to an existing cottage at Dog lake. The amendment also seeks to legalize a two storey addition to the building that has already been constructed illegally without any approvals from the Township. The effect would be a structure with a footprint of 1,829 square feet approximately 5.5 metres (18 ft.) from the lake. The whole structure would be within the normally required minimum 30 metre setback from the lake. Attachment #1 shows the subject property. According to the applicant, a tornado swept through the property in 2012. Approximately 100 trees fell as a result – some of which caused significant damage to the existing cottage on the lot. Subsequently, as part of the repair work, the owner constructed a two storey addition to the water side of the cottage – approximately 18 feet from the highwater mark of the lake. None of this construction had any permits or approvals from the Township and, thus, was carried out illegally. When the Township became aware of the illegal construction Planning advised the owner by letter dated September 1, 2015, that he must bring the structure into conformity with the Township’s regulations. Accordingly, the owner applied for a minor variance. However, the minor variance application erroneously did not address the illegal addition at the waterside of the cottage but, instead, sought relief to construct a whole new addition at the non-water side. Planning advised the owner of this situation but he wished to proceed with the application as submitted. His claim was that the waterside addition was built on the same

Page 31 of 189

footprint as a covered deck that was already there and which was destroyed by tempest. The application came to the Committee of Adjustment and was denied on the basis that it constituted too much development too close to the highwater mark of the lake when considering the area and location of the illegal portion of the building. The owner subsequently appealed the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. Now, the rezoning application seeks to address both the illegal construction and the proposed addition. An OMB hearing was scheduled for July 19, 2016 to hear the appeal on the minor variance, however, now that the rezoning application has been submitted the hearing has been adjourned. Ultimately, if the rezoning is approved, the hearing will not proceed. If the zoning is denied and the applicant appeals the decision, the Board would deal with both decisions at the same hearing.

Analysis The subject land is 0.6 hectares (1.5 ac.) in size and is located at Dog Lake with approximately 140 metres (460 ft.) of waterfrontage. A steep cliff embankment exists on a portion of the waterfront near the location of the cottage and the land still retains much of its original tree cover. Other than the steep cliff portion at the water the land offers no real constraints to development. In addition to the cottage near the water the land contains a gazebo, a woodshed, a boathouse with an attached bunkhouse at the water’s edge and two docks. Development on the property is shown on Attachment #2 hereto. Official Plan The land is designated Rural in the Township’s Official Plan. This designation permits residential waterfront development and it provides that all development shall be well set back from any waterbody. The Plan further establishes a minimum setback of 30 metres as a basis to implementing this intent. The Plan, however, does provide direction when dealing with existing legal noncomplying structures that are already developed within the 30 metre setback and on which owners wish to construct additions. It provides that such additions may be permitted but will be evaluated based on: a) The ultimate total gross floor area, building footprint and lot coverage being proposed; b) The closeness of the existing dwelling to the highwater mark; and c) The capacity of the lot to accommodate new development at a greater setback from the highwater mark. The Plan however specifies that, in no case shall an already encroaching structure be permitted to encroach further on the setback from the highwater mark. Zoning By-law The subject land is zoned Limited Service Residential Waterfront Zone (RLSW) in the Township’s Comprehensive Zoning By-law. This zone permits residential development on lots with waterfrontage recognizing that the land is accessed by a private lane with no Township maintenance. The RLSW zone specifies the required setbacks for new development on such lots including a requirement that development be a minimum of 30 metres from the highwater mark of any waterbody. The zoning by-law also requires that all construction be setback a minimum of 15 metres from the top-of-back of any slope greater that thirty percent.

Page 32 of 189

Supporting Studies In support of the development the applicant included an environmental study dated June 6, 2016, prepared by Ecological Services; a slope stability letter, dated May 26, 2016 prepared by Ainley Consulting Engineers Planners and a Planning Report, dated June 6, 2016 from FOTENN Consultants Inc. All reports are attached hereto as Attachment #3. The environmental report notes that the owner has built near the water on the existing footprint adding a two storey structure. It concludes that this has no environmental impact. Also, with respect to the addition to the rear of the building, the report advises that this is the most logical location for an addition since it maximizes the setback and minimizes the potential for environmental impact. The slope stability letter states that the entire frontage along the cottage property consists of solid, metasedimentary bedrock with an exposed, nearly vertical face above the water’s surface. The nature of the bedrock ensures that risk of any slope stability failure that would impact the existing structure is nearly nonexistent. The planning report supports the application through an analysis of the abovenoted four criteria in the Township’s Official Plan. The four criteria are stated below with comments from the planning Department in bold type: a) In terms of the ultimate total gross floor area, building footprint and lot coverage being proposed, the report concludes that the proposed additions represent only a minor increase in floor area relative to the overall lot size and compared to the established scale of development. The proposed addition to the non-waterside of the cottage virtually doubles the size of the footprint – all within the 30 metre setback from the lake. This cannot be considered a minor increase. The addition of a two storey structure near the water increasing the gross floor area also cannot be considered minor since there was never any gross floor area here in the first place. There appears to be confusion in the report over the terms ‘footprint’ and ‘gross floor area’. b) With respect to the closeness of the existing dwelling to the highwater mark, the planning report concludes that the development does not result in further encroachment on the water setback and is appropriate from an environmental perspective. There is nothing to show that the previously-existing roofed deck had the same footprint as the illegal addition. Certainly, if the owner had consulted with the Township following the destruction of the roofed deck, the size and footprint would have been confirmed and, under section 5.11 of the zoning by-law the structure that had existed, damaged by an act of God, could have been rebuilt as of right. However, there is no justification for an increase in living space on two storeys, 18 feet from the water’s edge which is a completely different structure than what had existed. c) To address the provision in the Official Plan that the capacity of the lot to accommodate new development at a greater setback from the highwater mark must be evaluated, the planning report concludes that the lot is of a size and shape that does not allow for a building envelope outside of the 30 metre water setback. This statement is clearly contradicted by the drawing on page 21 of the planning report which identifies an extensive building envelope. The lot does in fact have capacity to accommodate new development outside the 30 metre water setback.

Page 33 of 189

d) The planning report firmly states that evidence has been provided to prove that the lake side addition has been built within the footprint of the prior structure on the site and therefore absolutely no part of the proposal results in further encroachment. As noted above, there is no confirmation that the previous structure had the same footprint as the illegal addition. The addition with it’s deck may very well encroach further towards the water.

Agency Comments The Cataraqui region Conservation Authority had no objection the the proposal when it was circulated with the minor variance application and they were not circulated for comment on the present rezoning application. No comments have been received from the public in response to the circulation of the application.

Conclusion In consideration of the above review, it is this Department’s conclusion that the re-zoning to legalize the illegal construction and the proposal to add to the nonwaterside of the cottage cannot be supported. The environmental report and the planning report both appear to base their support on the supposition that the waterside addition was constructed on the same footprint as the previouslyexiting deck. There is nothing to support this supposition and there is also nothing to support the claim that the previous structure was destroyed by a tornado. If the owner voluntarily removed the structure in order to build the two storey living space addition then its legal non-complying status has been lost. If this is the case then the addition is very much closer to the water contrary to the claims of the environmental and planning reports that it is absolutely no closer. The development would result in a structure with a footprint of 1,829 square feet located 18 feet from the water’s edge constituting too much development too close to the water and contrary to the intent of the Official Plan.

Recommendation: It is recommended that the attached zoning by-law amendment, By-law No. 2016-42 to rezone the subject land in Part of Lot 20, Concession IX, Storrington District from RLSW to Special RLSW-114, be denied. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

StriceljZoningReport.doc

Page 34 of 189

Attachment #1

ag

’l

/

N .st ,x6

W.

• yU’/'

; 1.

t

s

/

r

8

:5j

I l

m

/

k,a’ (

/

!’ ..!’/? 7] ‘% ‘% /

/

r

/

?

6

./

v

r /’

/

/

/

‘S’

n

/

/

/

r

/

?

(,/

Faa

l?

‘ya

/

“f’-J

/

0

J l

lS

/

/)

-,?

(’ l

04

I

l

f

Gl

l?

S;

o%J '

?6 t i

[ / / /

/ /

I

}

/

Dog Lake

/ /

/’ [

V

} l

t4

Dog Lake %

f

t

l

7

)

‘r / l

S,

(’ / /

/

/

/

l

l

I

}

I

l .1 l

/

?

r

1

l

x / / I

j

)

l

i

11

M

l(,/”

S

l

)

l

I/

4

j

rry Lak

n

l

ll

O ‘-,"’? f

q4 l

S }( ‘)>

]/

)

i

I/

s

r

r

l

I

/ $ ‘>? f

/

S/ ri

L I

4,/

fl J

)

C

t

l I

)

i

11

l I

?

(J

l

/

j

/

I 11

I

//r

!r

l

/

0

/

t t I I

!

/)

4 Pronorhr r-guperTl

z

lo

I

/

11

/

/

f

r

Q

II 11

§

‘[-

/?"

ry ‘(

/5"

t

l

,N

?

Cranberry Lake

?n

j

4

/

7

jf

‘[*?

:i

P

r

r

<,’ o

‘y l

70 140

C

q

7> l

l

2ao

l

420

/‘T r Meters 560

1

l

/

r

)

r

/

r

/

r

/ j

/? /

7

?7 /

/

r r

/

<

}

€ <

(

%

Page 35 of 189

ATTACHMENT #2 vey Pirm. lhis 15 NOT J

l

’ebJ as a Compiled ?lsn

l

)

bny riknat purp>a :ed in }he Tikle 51ock.

??:;?X ‘oa;b ? ?%

‘-==-‘S

J-, ,> Labe

=-] ..fi

. ,a

0}’ UJ

21

C) o

0

:c " Q

!

o

/7

(S)l

t

N

x4

S

:,/,25 .?

S

lju I!h 11%

1’,

L J ,pRoposEDADDl.Tl0m

-A-:

B l

‘oi

k’

Q!I

gl

‘ffl

I I

S ‘-y

,1 //

}

I

I

I

j

;,,?los,?

}

m

S

-f

CONCE§S/OiV 9 I PART / PLAN /3R-2 l’lN 5(d8R-04]2 (LT)

l

I

L or

l

’l 1 ’l

l

4!

4?

it9-’?

qll’ /

PART / PLAN /3R-2/23 MN 562874-0412 (LT)

l p.i

llsn’Oaxn@-;n

lsi

ffi

S

‘%oaYvrl

1 ‘WexySykYya W. f ‘’ll*taSAbxck i

1 l Labbl*al-ab?SOuTll"fov€blbStadbt(ea

l

51

ILLEGAL ADDITION

20-

) l

B-kli4h.4hl

fl 3

t’lor

‘iki+*r<.+5ideYhrd ’eikbr-sr!+ffle’.Jlll

l I i

i ‘5vldqleqsk

ffi <

6

1 1 6,01 u 1 ;

l l

,)l

/

-‘7

l

l l l

-I.

z

‘?hPA"’eY s = 2.. .? " 1, % g i 7.7

• ‘L" ? '

i

l I

?l ?(;

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

2’N i

c

l

+x

AAlb ,1-17

,N,bzl

l3

-6s

Page 36 of 189

ATTACHMENT#3

• -’ EcologicalServices

l R.R. #l, 3803 Sydenham Road u!rv:mlisxv-rv rzs-,*riv:r, FIIK-T lA[ll

]

[4 ‘W

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE EVALUATION

Municipality: Township of South Frontenac (geographic Twp. of Storrington) Lots: Part Lot 20 i Concession: IX Municipal Address: 1610 Don Moore Road

Landowner: Don Stricelj Planning Application Reference: N.A. —- – – Description of Application: The landowner, Don Stricelj, contracted to have work undertaken on his existing cottage at 1610 Don Moore Road. The contractor failed to obtain a building perrnit for the work, and the landowner subsequently made application for a minor variance, which was not granted. He anticipates making an application for a Zoning By-law amendment. The work undertaken was the reconstruction of an existing portion of the cottage, on the same footprint, but with the addition of a second storey. Ecological Services was contracted to undertake an ecological assessment of the work undertaken, and of a proposed rear 1 !/i storey addition (within 30 m of Dog Lake) and a proposed new septic system. Site Descri tion:

The subject lot is located at the end of Don Moore Road, on Dog Lake (see Attachments l and 2), approximately 3 .9 km east of Battersea, Ontario. This is a cultural lot, located along the southern edge of the Frontenac Arch. The proposed work is shown in a site plan (Attachment 3). A. Ecological Land Classification The site is a cultural lot, which has been developed as a cottage lot, and shows evidence of its longterm residential use (see site photographs in Attachment 4).

Here the vegetation is characterized primarily by mowed lawn and natural grasses, remnant native tree species, and ornamental plantings, interspersed with rock and rocky knobs or outcrops. There were a few remnant areas (primarily near the woodshed, and along the shoreline other than the dock and boathouse locations) that were more typical of the natural, native vegetation cover typical of the Frontenac Arch, but these were not the area of focus, so ELC mapping was not appropriate for this site. B. Slope

The site is the cottage and proposed rear addition is fairly level, but the cottage is located on a high point of land and falls off abruptly to Dog Lake and more gently on other parts of the lot (demonstrating the ridge and valley topography typical of

Page 37 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

the Frontenac Arch). The cottage is set back approximately 6.3 m (20 feet) from the lake, but is also separated from the lake by a vertical separation of approximately 6 m. C. Water Quality

The Ministry of the Environment, Energy and Climate Change (MOEECC) manages a Lake Partners Program that analyzes water samples taken by citizen volunteers. Data on Dog Lake are available. Station 1217 Site ID2 is the closest sampling station to the subject property, but the data are over ten years old. That information (from 2002 to 2004) indicated Total Phosphorus (TP) levels between 22.95 pg/L and 36.43 pg/L, with a modest downward trend in TP. Data from nearby Station 1217 ID l (also in the north basin of Dog Lake) are more complete. Samples between 2002 and 2014 (the latest year available) range from 19.0 to 30.25 pg/L, with a modest downward trend in TP levels. MOEECC states that lakes with TP concentrations over 20 pg/L are eutrophic, and the Canadian guidelines (CCME 2004) refine those levels further, categorizing waterbodies with 20 to 35 pg/L TP to be meso-eutrophic. The available data suggest that Dog Lake is meso-eutrophic, or mildly nutrient rich. Is the Proposed Development:

Yes €[g No A. In a Provincially Significant Wetland or Coastal Wetland? Adjacent to a Provincially Significant Wetland or Coastal Wetland? Yes X g No Yes €(Z No B. In a Regionally Significant Wetland? - Ad,jacent to a Regionally Significant Wetland?

C. In/a4jacent to an Unevaluated Wetland? D. In an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest?

Adjacent to an Area of Natural and Scientific Interest? The closest provincially significant ANSI is the Loughborough Lake

Yes XZ No Yes €€ No Yes XZ No Yes €[Z No

Swamp, located approximately 7.3 km to the WNW.

Yes €€ No

E. In the habitat o’f’Species at Risk? A search of the Natural Heritage Information Center (NH{C’s) database

found several element occurrences reported for the 1 -km" Square within which the subject property is located. This does not mean that the observations were made on the subject property, but rather that these

species have been seen in the area, and may be present. The records are all old in this case (thirty years and over), and we note that no Threatened or Endangered species were listed.

One restricted species was noted, but the report dates back to 1933, and is a species considered to be extirpated. Given the age of the report and the fact that the cottage property has been developed for many years, it is our opinion that this species is not present on the subject property. It is our opinion that the redevelopment and addition of a second storey to the cottage, and the proposed addition of a l !/. storey addition to the rear of the cottage will have no impact on this species at risk.

2

Page 38 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Stricelj

Yes [g€ No

Adjacent to habitat of Species at Risk?

It is probable that Threatened or Endangered species may be present in the area, in particular associated with Dog Lake. This may include Blanding’s Turtles and Gray Ratsnakes (both of which have been reported in this square of the Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas Ontario Nature 2015). Both these and other species may occasionally use the subject lot.

The May 23 site visit was undertaken specifically to check for any evidence of Gray Ratsnake hibernacula. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry provides guidance in surveying for these animals (Pitt, personal communication), and this work was done accordingly. We found no evidence of Gray Ratsnake concentrations, nor any individual animals on site. While Gray Ratsnakes may occasionally pass through the site, it is our opinion that the completed and proposed work will have no impact on these animals. We considered the potential for impact on Blanding’s Turtles. These turtles leave the water to finding nesting areas, and the rock would not provide suitable habitat. Blanding’s nests are typically created in open habitats with low vegetation cover and high sun exposure such as in forest clearings, meadows, shorelines, beaches, rocky outcrops, cornfields, gravel roads, road shoulders, ploughed fields, gardens, power line rights-of-ways, yards and abandoned railroad beds. A Blanding’s Turtle could conceivably use the compacted gravel area at the rear of the cottage for nesting purposes, but its location by the door of an existing cottage makes it unlikely, particularly considering the available extent of alternative and more appropriate nesting sites (e.g., on the north side of the lot). It is also noted that Blanding’s Turtles are

known to demonstrate fidelity to a chosen nesting area, and they have not previously been observed to nest in this location. Given the observed site conditions and known information, it is our opinion that this work will have no impact on Blanding’s Turtles. We note that the redevelopment and addition were restricted to the previously developed footprint, and that there was no disturbance of natural habitat. The installation of a new septic system and an upgrade to a tertiary system will be set back 30 m from Dog Lake, and the resultant reduction to nutrient outputs should result in a modest improvement to lake water quality. The addition of a l !/i storey addition to the rear of the cottage will affect an area that is currently characterized by sparse grass, rock, and a compacted and gravel-treated surface; The distance to Dog Lake is less than 30 m, but it is maximized by building to the rear of the existing cottage, and no natural vegetation cover or habitat will be affected. It is our opinion

that the completed and proposed work will have no negative impact on 3

Page 39 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Stricelj

the habitat for species at risk. F. In significant wildlife habitat? Adjacent to significant wildlife habitat? The search of the NHIC database found several element occurrences

reported for the 1 -km2 square within which the subject property is located. Species that are of conservation concern, but not ranked as Threatened or Endangered, are assessed when considering significant wildlife habitat. The reported species are discussed below: Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica): a highly aquatic turtle, it is rare to uncommon in Ontario (S3), and considered to be a species of Special Concern (SC) by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) and the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO). Although the report is old (1936) it is likely that Map Turtles are still present, and they would be associated with Dog Lake, with potential to emerge onto adjacent uplands during nesting season. Given that the redevelopment and addition were on the footprint of an existing structure, that the area of that addition is bald, unbroken rock, that the area of the proposed rear addition is sparse grass and compacted gravel driveway, and that there is a significant elevation difference between the elevation of the cottage and that of Dog Lake, it is our opinion that this work will have no impact on Map Turtles.

Broad Beech Fern (Phegopteris hexagonoptera); a fern that prefers to grow in rich soils in deciduous forest such as Maple-Beech forests. In Ontario, the species is found in forest remnants in southem Muskoka District, along Lake Erie, and in the St. Lawrence river region. Ontario is the notthern limit for this species, and it was probably never common here. Historical records suggest that it was once more widespread in the province, and may have declined as forests were cleared; this sighting dates back to 1960. This species is considered to be rare to uncommon in Ontario (83), and is considered to be an SC species by COSEWIC and COSSARO. The subject property does not appear to provide appropriate habitat for this species, and it is our opinion that the completed and proposed work will have no impact on its population. Rams-head Lady’s Slipper (Cypripedium arietinum’). Most Ontario populations of this species are along the sandy shores of Lake Huron. This tiny plant grows in lightly shaded areas with calcareous soils, and is characteristic of the alvars around the Great Lakes in North America.

It is considered to be uncommon in Ontario (S3), but has not been

assigned a rank by COSEWIC or CASSARO. As this sighting was pre-1986, and we found no suitable habitat, we consider it unlikely that this species is present on the subject property.

G. W’ithin 120-m of a waterbody? -

Yes [€ No

The lot has frontage on Dog Lake, although it is noted that the cottage 4

Page 40 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

gke level.

Yes €[Z Nq.

H. In fish habitat?

Adjacent-to-fishhabitat? Dog Lake supports many fish species, including Smallmouth and Largemouth Bass and Northern Pike. Lake Trout were once found in the lake, but were eliminated by over-fishing; today the lake is stocked with hybrid Splake, which are mainly found in the northern, deeper end of the lake. The proposed new, tertiary septic system will reduce nutrient outputs from the subject property, and will contribute to a modest improvement to Dog Lake’s water quality. This should result in a net benefit to fish and fish habitat in Dog Lake. I. Adjacent to Highly or Moderately Sensitive Lake Trout Lake?

J. In a significant woodland?

Yes (Z€ No

Yes €X No Yes €IZ No

Tree cover is present on the subject lot, but it serves an ornamental purpose, as the lot has been developed for seasonal residential purposes. (See site photographs in Attachment 4.)

• Adjacent to a significant woodland?

Yes [:][g No

The subject lands are located on a peninsula of land on the west side of Dog Lake’s west basin. The peninsula has been largely cleared of natural vegetation for agricultural purposes, although there is remnant tree cover in the cottage area at the tip of the peninsula. The remnant woodland is not significant for the purposes of the PPS.

K. In a significant ‘valleyland? Adjacent to a significant valleyland?

Yes €(Z No Yes €[Z No

l

l

is located on a high rock area, and is approximately 6 m higher than the

1

Assessment of Net Benefit:

The landowner has rebuilt an existing front porch area and added a second storey, on the exact footprint of the original structure. We considered several points:

• the cottage is set back only 6.3 m (20 ft), but it is also located on a high point of land and is approximately 6 m (19.7 ft) above the water level as well.

• the location of the addition is bare, solid rock, and construction resulted in no impact to natural vegetation or other species.

• the only potential impact is a potential for a greater number of people to use the cottage at one time.

• the landowner proposes to install a new septic system, which should effectively manage human waste.

The landowner proposes to construct a l ‘A storey addition to the rear of the cottage (see Attachment 3). We considered:

• there is no existing natural cover in the area that would be affected by the addition, although one young White Pine tree will have to be removed or transplanted. The area is characterized by sparse lawn, rock, and compacted gravel associated with the existing entranceway.

• a portion of the addition area already supports a covered frame deck area.

• The addition would be within 30 m of Dog Lake, but will also have further separation s

Page 41 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Stricelj

created by the elevation difference between the lake and the Site Ofthe additi0n (approximately 6 m).

The landowner also proposes to replace the existing septic system with a new tertiary septic system. The existing tank will remain, but a new tertiary bed will be located in the area of the existing fire-pit (see Attachment 4). We considered:

• teitiary septic systems are known to dramatically reduce the strength of waste output, that is by an order of magnitude (e.g., from a waste count of 120-1 50mg/l BOD5 to a count of 15 mg/l).
• the new tile bed will be located 30 m from the high water level of Dog Lake. As the landowner has built on the existing footprint where a second storey was added, and given the nature of the site, it is our opinion that there has been no impact to the natural heritage features or their ecological functions of the lot. As the landowner has proposed to locate the l ‘/i storey addition to the rear of the lot, maximizing its setback from Dog Lake, and to be located in a cultural area, it is our opinion that this is the most appropriate location for an addition, in order to minimize the potential for ecological impact. It would be appropriate to ensure that stormwater runoff from the roof be directed to the rear of the lot to maximize the path of flow into Dog Lake. With respect to the proposed installation of a tertiary septic system, it is our opinion that this will result in a modest net benefit to Dog Lake through the reduction of nutrient input into the lake. As the lake is meso-eutrophic, this is to be encouraged.

In our opinion, is a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) required to l

demonstrate the appropriateness of the proposed development? Yes [I]§ No If yes, which natural feature(s) should the assessment focus on? ,

Recommendations for Mitigation:

• It is recommended that the rain gutters on the cottage be set to drain runoff toward the rear of the lot, which will increase its flow path to Dog Lake. l
• The landowner reports the loss of many trees as a result of a weather event in the

summerof20l2,andindicatesaninterestinsomereplanting.Itisrecommendedthat l

native tree and/or shrub species be considered, being the most well adapted for the area and therefore the most likely to survive. It is also recommended that invasive nonnatives such as Norway Maple be avoided.

Contacts, References & Literature Cited: Charette, Monique. Personal communication. Biologist, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Kingston Office. 613-531-5715.

Ontario. 2006. Inland Ontario Lakes Designated for Lake Trout Management. 53 pp. Ontario Nature. 2015. Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas. Available online at: < http://www.ontarionature.org/dynamic-maps/dynamic-maps/> Pitt, Kate. Personal communication. Species at Risk Biologist, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough District. Email dated 2015.10.21.

6

Page 42 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Stricelj

Provincial Policy Statement. 2014. Issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act. Province of Ontario. 50 pp.

l

Qironmental Site Evaluation Completed By: Mary Alice Snetsinger ?5ate of Site Inspections: May 13 and May 23, 2016 J5ate ofReport: June O, 2016

l

White, David J. 1993. Life Science Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest in Site District 6-10: A Review and Assessment of Significant Natural Areas. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Kemptville and Tweed Districts. 122 pp., plus map.

Signature: l’l.

Au: -1 p{,z 4<J!’ l S

i ?

7

Page 43 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

Attachment 1. Annotated detail from topographic map Gananoque 31 C/8, showing the

wa

Attachment 2. 2014 satellite imagery, with the approximate location of the lot indicated,

along with site features discussed in the report. Approximate area of proposed tertiary sewage bed in circled in yellow, and the approximate limits of a 30 m setback shown.

Annotated base ima6e from <frontenacmaps.ca>

80 a lh@ u ? 4

(

J l li .%

Exiiilinq !ank

% .@

r

d’

1

Co!lage % ‘-,

11

W

ffl

Dog Lake

s

P

t

1

?-?=-.===- -ai

r 7

l I-

?l

l

-sa?

i-? i

8

Page 44 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

Attachment 3. Site plan showing the location of the existing and proposed works. Annotated detail from a plan prepared by Annabel Designs, Revision 4, and dated October 2015. Amendment to the plan is shown by the indication that the septic field will be located beyond the 30 m setback.

/

t

/ /

r

l

/

o

Q

%Jl

4(

‘-,.——-;76.,? ,/,

‘4qaoiirJ?Level rame Ot.r

art

r5o

c

2

?€

m J O o

0

9

Page 45 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

Attachment 4. Site photographs, taken by the report author on the dates specified.

i

m i -j

41

r

El

r

I

d.i

Q

‘,J y’: br .??, r

X

.1

,‘Q ll r

l/

W} ,%? P’Ja. -,;

i i

l

(3

?

P?

fflk

Ni,

jl

pW

T 11 l

Photo 1. View to the west (Dog Lake in the distance). The lighter wood of

l

the rebuild/addition can be seen to be

%

.1

sitting on bare rock. Note the sparse

la! r W

kiA

groundvegetation. 20l6.05.23.

l

W

‘!l

I

l

l

i

j.

T

i

L !

Ii 11 11

l

]

.L-

?l

l b*s( a

l

l

-1 r

j

%f N

‘: ‘fi?’ -!?

-k k

6’l

‘%,,

%–?

(q

(! ‘G k’

alll

!

Photo 2. View to the SSW along the front of the new section of cottage. Note the bare, solid rock, with more natural vegetation maintained along the shoreline slopes in the distance. 2016.05 .23.

!

l

?

– ?1

LJ

r"

’l

“‘a?ml’!’ I

p

1l

Photo 3. View down toward Dog

,haw,-as4

Lake from the top of the stairs. Note the significant elevation difference between the cottage and lake levels.

74!w ?? rar j

rhwx ?d,=?

41 ?ffi ?%

/

-aa?

20l6.05.23. !

10

Page 46 of 189

Page 47 of 189

Ecological Services: June 6, 2016

Environmental Site Evaluation: Strice5

!’!

’l

l?

l?

%l l

s

,.4 .-l

1>

r

J

I

u

I

p

1

t

l

7- ;1’-

!

&r

JJ-’?

l s

I

F

?.2l

Wll

N

cottage where the proposed addition will go, encompassing the tarp-wrapped Frame Deck, and continuing in line with the existing structure, and including a carport over the gravel drive. Note the sparse lawn and gravel-treated substrate, and the young

m7-J

il

11

Photo 7. View to the NNW at the end of the

or !allll ? i €!J -4

ufflJ r

tl 11 !71

m

k

W= ’ 4

?-

s

,’-mj

White Pine that will be or relocated. l removed 20l6.05.l3. !b -*

-? j *?

-<

,7 11

W’l

i nl

% li

i

/

@? ?- -

s+i

/ / /

0(

/ J’/ /

r

Ji a?

Y”,

1. :?a n

41

tatJ’ -a- 41 ‘i rrsi

“?’?

-I ?

.-.r

l? ,?

iii:‘i

1

%1 !‘i

v

4jl l K

J

‘!r

W

t

3 '

f

l

n ‘A4

!’?,

i’!

<’ f

-7 ‘, q& f 4 M

7

i 9

l’sS WF>:a - h.’

r,

b’jbll

T’ m

] ‘ffil’.l Q

i

l

l

g

l Photo 8. View to the ;’!l west of the existing

r

1&

cottage. The proposed

f ds0

!7,

4t

M !

addition would come toward the viewer and

f

ffi

r

j

r

Y]4

i %’ll

l,p !..

i

?1

71

lw ffl

li

‘?

l

[’l

l

r:

l

I

l

l

l

8%, . .

?

l

1

l

k

P, ?%

?

1

/a )-I

!

*.

I l

Photo 9. View to the

l

%

r

r

2016.05.23.

W aaa&l’%Lfl

‘!

Q

nature of the area.

?-’l

Th

a’

the existing gazebo. Note the open, cultural

‘-

east along the side of the cottage toward the area of the proposed addition. l Note the open, cultural ’ nature of the area, over

i

native bedrock. “, 2016.05.13.

12

Page 48 of 189

Ainlqy

CON8ULTING EN(aEERS PIANNERS

Ainley Graham & Associates Limited 1-50 Grant Timmins [)rive, Kingston, Ontario K7M 8N2 Tel: (343) 266-0002 - Fax: (343) 266-0028 E-mail: kingston@ainleygroup.com

May 26, 2016

File No. 16826-1

1040 Sutton Drive, Unit 2

Burlington, ON L7L 6B8 Email: don@ryanmedical.com VIA EMAIL ONLY

Attn: Don Stricelj Property Owner

Ref: Limited Slope Stability - Letter Report 1610 Don Moore Lane, South Frontenac Dear Sir:

Further to our recent visit to the site (May 13, 2016), we have outlined below our findings related to the limited slope stability analysis for the above noted property. l l 11 IP

BACKGRO ROUND

It is understood that an open porch on the water side (west side) of the original cottage was removed and a two storey addition was constructed within the same footprint directly on the existing bedrock outcrop overlooking the lake. We understand construction occurred within the Iast year or so. A ground Ievel wood deck has also been constructed along the frontage of the addition. It is understood that the municipality has requested that a slope stability review be completed to assess the integrity of the existing bedrock outcrop. SITE DESCR?PTION AND OBSERVATIONS

The property is located at 1 610 Don Moore Lane on Dog Lake in the Township of South Frontenac. The property is legally described as Part 2, Lots 20 & 21, Concession 9, Township of South Frontenac and encompasses an area of O.623 hectares. The existing cottage is Iocated in the southern portion of the property on top of an approximately 6 metre high, near vertical, bedrock face overlooking the lake to the west. See Enclosure No. 1 - Site Plan attached.

The immediate area surrounding the east portion of the cottage is relatively flat with a slight slope from west to east (sloping away from the lake). In the area of the addition on the west side of the cottage, exposed bedrock is prominent with a slight slope from north to south. The exposed bedrock can be classified as carbonate metasedimentary rock (marble) with no visible evidence of vertical cracking. (Reference - Bedrock Geology of Ontario, Southern Sheet, Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2544)

The cottage addition consists of a two storey, wood framed structure with wood siding. The building is founded on cylindrical concrete piers bearing directly on bedrock (similar arrangement to Drawing AO4.1 , prepared by Perspective Views, June 24, 2015) pinned with 15M bars to a minimum depth into bedrock of 250 mm. Based on our measurements, the building envelope is setback from the bedrock edge (at the Iake) a distance of approximately 6 metres. See Enclosure No. 2 attached for typical photographs taken May 13, 2016.

Page 49 of 189

Ainl?

J!lff (l)aw

Don Stricelj

tj?

Limited Slope Stability - 1 6"l 0 Don Moore Lane

m

’ i &’ piaess

BEDROCK STABILITY

The entire shoreline frontage along the cottage property consists of solid, metasedimentary bedrock with an exposed, near vertical face above the water surface. The nature of the bedrock (no bedding, little to no fracturing) ensures that risk of any slope stability failure of the bedrock that will impact the existing structure is nearly ’non-existent’.

Given the existing set back to the structure (6 m), we are of the opinion that no further construction constraints with respect to slope stability are necessary. We recommend however, that any roof drainage from the structure and hard sufaces (driveway, paving stone etc.) be dispersed toward the south and east side of the building as much as possible to prevent concentrated flow of water and to allow for disbursement within the existing shallow overburden soils.

It is further recommended that the existing vegetation and trees covering the embankments remain undisturbed as much as possible in order to maintain existing site conditions.

We trust the attached information meets your needs and please do not hesitate to contact our office should you have any questions or concerns. Yours very truly AINLEY GRAHAM & ASSOCIATES L?MITED

Hr,i’

?,

Bill McLatchie, P. Eng. Senior Project Manager cc. Mike Keene, Fotenn

File No.: 16826-1

-2-

Ainley Group

Page 50 of 189

?

?

l

i *:

rl

m

W

! P

t k

t?

11 l l

l

l

l

l

I

0

s (/)

N

h

m r

/ -

n

h

l

w

.-@- si /

l l

X o

l

l l

s

z’ :

59 fl:i

t

,l

0 Z l f/)

IE wb@

‘%%

G’i “J)

Ii lm *J ‘?yl o5a)

?a

z’-,:

l

l’*-.?

i

?

t

l

E= ‘w o Q o &!l m

O 4 O e

A

:C .5

l

{

%

-*tia al ‘@ s!

k3’l

,‘4.’la-

d’O

.@% rW, t

(:ts

:l’:@

%%q*

%’

B C) A

&*s i 01{

l

&I ,. iim4t i

’ hlNl €

A @ (€

‘1’ m? 05@

l

i5.i W

• %i a

?

–?

.63,

%

L’ -’ l

s

g-J

ta

il0’?=ub.@” % ‘:’!

@

f

%-@ li

No

W

b

W < u o W

lllia,

I

l * %

‘==‘r-

0 4

p ?(/1 :?m pr3) 0;

kj Y

I

l

l

l

t

I

i

t

it ;.

W*O’

l(l

lh%

2!18/ ' i ? z ? 4?*

/

?€

F ? i

l

l ll

a)>

t

‘f’T. Ll

l

o

CL

k

@W

I

art

jp

411

o o

l m

ffi’

? N§

ffi

‘S

%

D

a)

C: ? -

%

wh*

g

a)

J

%

l

%

?@ ;Q

(Ll C m

3:

art

<4i

l

s

5 6!:

%t

ffl

l I

‘@ a3!

i

? (0

I: l

s

rl. ,l

4u

l

s

g:

i

C

l

l

I

r

l

I

}

s Q s s

l

l

:E

l

l}

/ ia ‘i’?% -x*

)!

t-11

o o

]

l

l I

W

l

t’

i

i

l

l l

! l l Ii 1 1

l

Ij

l

1

i l

% Y

?9?]!5 Q

IJ’ (N t

s l

00 o m

o z (U LL

lJ:i::

Page 51 of 189

Enclosure No. 2 - Photographs

Limited Slope Stability Review - 1610 Don Moore Lane @?

w

i

l$

l

J

?

‘41

-i l

t;

I

,1l

y@’,” = ;w* ‘/I

-Ql

l

t l

l €?l i

1

l

l

;

l

Jn,’

l

!

I

7

1

U

fJ

J

1

W

]

r

1 J 1

i M

r

‘11

r

1 i

r.

l

?

m

i

i

f

l

1. ,’

i

r

fi

k#

% k

’l

p-l

Jl

& %

‘!

r

%t

@- ‘, : ? . a?/,*ala4

f b

l

%-€ .

i ‘fx*?

wl?

-A

“J r:4

‘A -m

lm

?d- 4hht-’

a

New Addition - looking north

?

l

r

1

(

7!. ‘%

.-&

L i

p

4

4

J

b

ri

sr

?

?-

i

j r,

%

I

j

‘1 c

I

Qi; p

I. s

j-?

Th &’

F

-?

I

1

(

’l

at

fl

-‘q

1

’m rN Fi ;’! % !!M ?0r- r ?y

• • !

ffi

i

!l

J

r’?

l

F 014

m

i

J

l

l

I

l

l

l l1m

wr

l l

l j

l

1 w

ls

Q

i

l

New Addition - looking north

File No. 16826-1

Page 52 of 189

Enclosure No. 2 - Photographs

Limited Slope Stability Review - 1610 Don Moore Lane 1

y

r

s

-?i r

Q

?

t I

/

/

l

l ff

i

r r

i f

l

J

J

j

j

l

$

p-

l

4

r

:‘i

r-

b

f

r

W

W

7

W

r’

Q

!?]

7, 1

rj

wa

4?

ri

r

@

,0%,

M

a&

?

r 1?

!’ ‘1 P

!

t

u

’m

4

P

j

r

i

y

r

P.

j!

r

/?

)

r

w-

M?

‘aaal

?< r 4 6

t

r.

y

r

i

F 4

r

-. ? 1

4hi-

Top of Bedrock Iooking down to lake

% Q

%b !

j

?

? ?

! b

‘a’l

w??‘i

t ‘I

F

m

I J

1

0

;

rr-

j?

l

/-

l

v

l1l?

QW

j’j

rb

c

?

r $

r

l

‘a

t

[

!

% i

k

l

! !

1

l

1i

t

i

r

l

i f

ffi

i

i 1 1

W

I

1

I i

y’l

7

p k

!

‘]

t

1

‘!

4

‘J

t

l

‘1

.1

1

Bedrock shoreline, Iooking south from dock

File No. 16826-1

Page 53 of 189

Enclosure No. 2 - Photographs Limited Slope Stability Review - 1610 Don Moore Lane

w

l

l

z

@

[-, r

i

i

ffi

? ? 4

W Typical footing - new addition

File No. 16826-1

Page 54 of 189

1610 Don Moore Lane Waterfront Residential Expansion

Planning F<eport: IJ ‘? n e “:.i’a. 2 (,?aai6

Submitted to:

Towriship of .c?:+oi..*i:h. Froi-i’i:eriac

In support of application for: Zorling B’}/-raw Aii-‘ier-idr’lqenC

Prepared for: Don Stricelj 2425 Shadow Court

Oakville, ON 905-483-0824

Prepared by:

FOTENN The Woolen Mill

6 Cataraqui Street, Suite 108 Kingston, ON K7K IZ7 613.542.5454

www.fotenn.com

Page 55 of 189

Introduction In 2012, a significant storm event occurred which resulted in extensive damage to the subject property. Approximately 100 trees were lost, several of which fell onto and caused

considerable damage to the existing cottage. As a result, the owner consulted a designer to design the required repair work as well as some additional improvements, including a second storey addition. Many of the trees that were lost in the storm were processed into Iumber and utilized in the design. A contractor was then retained to obtain all riecessary permits and complete the work.

While the contractor did complete some of the proposed work on the Iake side, he did not obtain the riecessary permits or planning approvals. Planning staff informed the applicant that the improved structure did not comply with the zoning by-Iaw and that a minor variance would be required to seek relief. In accordance with staff direction, the owner submitted a minor variance application in October 2015. Staff did not support the application and it was denied by Committee of Adjustment in February 2016.

This Planning Report, prepared by FOTENN Consultants Inc. on behalf of the owrier, Mr. Don Stricelj, is provided in support of an application for Zoning By-Law Amendment to recognize the second storey addition and to permit a new addition and carport on the east side of the cottage.

The County of Frontenac Official Plan, approved February 2, 2016, the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan, dated March 2003, and the Township’s Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw #2003-75, dated May 2003, provide poiicy direction and regulate the development of the lands. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the manner in which the proposed development meets the goals and objectives of the Official Plans and represents good land use planning. This report will summarize the existing conditions of the property and surrounding land use context, outline the nature of the proposed development, summarize supporting studies and reports, review the development in relation to provincial and municipal land use planning policies and regulations, and propose required amendments to the Zoning By-law.

2. Overview of Applications A Zoning By-Iaw Amendment would rezone the Iands from RLSW to RLSW-X in order to

recoqriize a previously constructed second storey addition arid to permit the development of a new addition and carport. The following reliefs are required: *

Reduce the minimum required front yard setback / setback from highwater mark from 30 m to 6.3 m

Decrease the minimum required setback from top of bank from 15 m to 1 m (only for the deck)

PLANNING REPORTlZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l610 DON MOORE LANE

3

Page 56 of 189

d P

m

%

p

Doq Lake

PLANNING REPORTiZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l610 DON MOORE LANE

s

Page 57 of 189

%

li /

% "

f

1

M

(.

wa

€

‘ffflal31

i

‘HsBe-’€‘J.’…’,,.’ ?J ‘@@’ :

i

m

Q Q

?

jwl’j

l

!”

’l

l:

/

l

I lm

w l

4’.

l l

t

&

1

i

11

‘fl!

w

I

l

I

‘%

‘i

l

s l

l J

1

wM

10-W

4

l

l

l

‘?

w?

l

l

r

t ?

v l

gwh

I i

il

l

l’

l t

,!

I

l

l

L

h

l

l

l

r:i

l

l

7

l l’

L

l

:}r.

4A

L:” ?sw?

@%*-,

‘fl!!? ?44% %’

k

%7b,’,,4j

’m

?-M

7

P’

i

:J

J ?’

m

k

la’

a?’

l m

tj

l

%w’?

r r

[

.’:%.

z -i +

%

.1

1

ki

}

j

:] r61

%-i

:44 b.

’ W ?’

‘%’

I?

q

s

b

I?4 "

ffi

k

j(

*’

%,.

% ?

-J

‘90

,’%.

!aa% %

i

P

l

$1

J

!

=<

-‘i ;4

l

I

,.f%,.

‘?. j

W

%’

2-m s?t? ffi

!’l

%

l1

k o.s “Is’?

Y

PLANNING REPORTIZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l610 DON MOORE LANE

7

Page 58 of 189

In the spring of 2015, the owner added a second storey to a portion of the cottage facing the water. While the pylon foundation was replaced to reflect modern day building practices, the original footprint was maintained to ensure the improvements did not result in further encroachment on the 30 metre water setback. The design of the addition utilizes natural building materials so that the structure blends with the natural Iandscape as well as the rest of the original cottage. ffi

?

??ilJl

?

f

111

r’

1

J

l’

@?

,1

;,@,

‘ffi

y-

‘4-k,

s d’al

7?!?”’ ? ‘-’ ?’:?- -

l

91,

!Fn

l

00

%

*l

s

ir mlimrr

I

4 :1

J

‘{. .}

rs

mm

4

L’

l -.11’

Y

:1

11 W

z

l

1

]-

m

s’j l

J

l

‘!)

1

g

• ?kv

l

l

I

l

l

tl

r

l

l

I

I

l

11

t

$1

l

i

’l

II

i

l

l

I

r

l

l

l

i !

i

r

l

i

S

..j

“a

PLANNING REPORTIZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTl 1610 DON MOORE LANE

9

Page 59 of 189

‘zr).,;*>-m

0 l’;lq,nqai’i iii ‘:“rrnm#r-’

'

-’

-’

‘–

‘-

'

'

‘-”

-’

-’

‘-’

‘-’

'

'

IF,,o,,M

Q=:i

l–

' il11 ‘aiyi yh 0 w -,,.,, al&l%l+l’k….. <+ffl-.llrs :Ixw’- ’ - - – - - .- - .- l -. -l l

, Ii l, l@’ ji-’li :! ,,,’….1 lil ,l …-k.I):jmMffl.mlk11. . . lii. . . .l.l. lv. ?.

mW

..!…’{IN’,dll{us,,. ,,.,,

‘-"-l . ,,,, ’ … …..-.. …-………. … ……….l.i -.1:,-’ ……. –.-11. .. i ‘-i’j j

li

l).i S

ljl’;oyx.

.

.

ii

….

.

.

.

..

.

• g y++{aW# .** swsui-* a.nly lt’;S - -

: i ‘7e"i P L=]’ Q= :..J [’e1 LJ L!J t}’.i2lhwnxx ,, ’ . lii -’ . … .l

(l

-fffi-:l

1 il K 111” 1

,.,i , y(5)’,: l ,’

),,

r

lt

1

t

l

l

[

n

.,.-,.=.:.=-

‘%’eJ’k- .- -. — - - - - - - – ’ - - –

‘- ‘- '

0 (‘r’i’>wnmnlN , - , ,,,, - ,, ,,,–,, ,,, ,, -,,- ,,, -, — - - -,, - ,- ,-,, ,, ,, ,-, - - ,, - - ,, (:l3.*)“I!#XkK ' ' -’ ' –’ -’-’-

0

=—

ilJl:!4%k%!}Jjl,- -, l- —

u ’ ,IM c5>-N=-=-, -%l’ii. - i,ts:isw-:ur*mt "” € " l-1 i a. I ‘. o. . .%.I- ‘TT

l

rai

:.::ms*mww+rx

The existing septic system will be replaced with a new technologically advanced tertiary septic system. The new tanks will remain close to the house as is standard, but a new tertiary bed will be located in the area of the existing fire-pit and outside of the 30 metre water setback.

PLANNING REPORTiZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l6l0 DON MOORE LANE

11

Page 60 of 189

interest related to land use planning. Decisions affecting planning matters “must be consistent with” the policy statements issued under the authority of the Planning Act. The proposal is consistent with the PPS with respect to the following:

Section 7.7.52 - On rura/ /ands /ocated in .municipa/itie5 permjtted uses are: o

The management or use of resources,’

o

Resource-based recreational uses (inc/uding recreationa/ dwel/ings);

Limited residentia/ deve/opment,’ o Home occupations and home industries;

o

o Cemeteries,’ and o Other rural ?and uses.

The proposed development represents both a resource-based recreational use and is

representative of the type of Iimited residential development experienced broadly in areas blessed with an abundance of Iakes.

Section 7. 7.5.4 - Deve/opment that is compatib/e with the rura/ Iandscape and can be sustained by rural service /eve/s shou/d be promoted

The proposed development will maintain the rural, picturesque qualities of the landscape by largely building up rather than out. The property also contains a large vvater frontage and retains much of its natural features in the form of exposed bedrock and naturally covered areas. The dwelling will continue to be serviced by a private septic system and well. Sectjon 7.7.55 - Development shall be approprjate to the jnfrastructure which is p/anned or avai/ab/e, and a void the need for the unjustified and/or uneconomica/ expansion of this infrastructure.

The subject property is currently serviced by a private well and septic system and is accessed by an existing private road.

Section 2. 7. 6 - De velopment and site alteration sha// not be permitted in fish habitat except in accordance with provincial and federa/ requirements. The proposed development is not located within fish habitat.

Section 2. 7. 7 - Development and site alteration shall not be permi’tted i’n habt’tat of

endangered species and threatened species, except in accordance wjth provincial and federal requirements.

According to the Environmental Site Evaluation, the proposed development is not located in habitat of Species at Risk. It is probable that Threatened or Endangered species may be present in the area, in particular associated with Dog Lake. This may include Blanding’s Turtles and Gray Ratsnakes. Both these and other species may occasionally use the subject lot. Ecological Services notes that the redevelopment and addition vvere restricted to the previously developed footprint, and that there was no disturbance of natural habitat. The installation of a new septic system and an upgrade to a tertiary system will result in minor reductions to nutrient outputs and should result in a modest improvement to Iake vvater quality. The addition of a 1 !/2 storey addition to the rear of the cottage will affect an area that is currently characterized by sparse grass, rock, and a compacted and gavel-treated surface.

PLANNING REPORTiZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTl 1610 DON MOORE LANE

13

Page 61 of 189

The proposal represents a sustainable form of growth. The west (waterside) addition

maintains the original building footprint and expands only upward, thus avoiding further encroachment towards the Iake. The proposed east addition is at the rear of the cottage and away from the lake.

(5) To ensure that the bui/t form a/ong a shore/ine is not o ver/y concentrated or dominatjng to the detriment of the natura/ form;

The west addition involved replacing the existing enclosed seasonal structure and adding a second storey. Utilizing the existing footprint ensured that the building is not brought any closer to the water, thus minimizing impacts on the shoreline. Natural building materials have been used to blend the structure with the natural landscape.

(6) To maintain, enhance and/or restore the majority of the developed and undeve/oped shorelines in their natura/ state by promoting property stewardship;

The subject site will be maintained in its naturalized state and there may be some opportunity to re-naturalize a portion of the gravelled area near the house.

(7) To preserve and enhance fish and wild/ife habitat areas and other natura/ heritage features that are within and along Waterfront Areas.

An Environmental Site Evaluation was prepared which determined the proposed development is not located in significant wildlife habitat. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4 Po/icies

(7) The character of Waterfront Areas is /inked to the natura/ and built form that is associated with the /akes and rivers in the County. General/y the natural form inc/udes vegetated shore/ines wjth thin soi/s over bedrock. The built form is predomjn,ated by residentia/ development including resorts and marinas. /n this context, new deve/opment or redevelopment occurring in the Waterfront Areas should where possible enhance and protect those qua/ities that contribute to the area’s character; The proposed development consists of a modest expansion of an existing seasonal dwelling on a large lot. The west (waterside) addition already constructed adding a second storey to an existing enclosed structi.ire and is restricted to the existing building footprint. The east addition will expand the building logically and away from the water. The proposed additions will enhance the character of the area by repairing and renewing an older seasonal structure.

(6) Tree cover and vegetation is encouraged to be retained along the shore/ine to maintain the visua/ and ell vironmenta/ integrity of Waterfront Areas. Where deve/opment is proposed a/ong shore/ines, Township Official Plans should contain poli’cies re/ati’ng to the preservation of a natural undisturbed buffer between the wateYs edge and new deve/opment; As seen in Figure 2, the site remains mostly in a natural state. Since already constructed addition did not require any shoreline vegetation to be removed as it is Iocated on bare bedrock. Similarly, there is no existing natural cover in the area that would be affected by the east (rear) addition, although one young White Pine tree will have to be removed or relocated.

(7) To maintain the shore/ine character and water qua/ity, Township Official P/ans and Zoning By-laws sha// require that.’

a. For new /ot creation, bui/dings and structures, induding the septic system ti/e field must be set back at least 30 metres (700 feet) from the ordinary high water marks of all waterbodies with non-disturbance of the native soils and very /imited shore/ine remova/. This is a long established situation and the dwelling benefits from legal non-complying status

and as such this policy does not directly apply to the site. However the intent of the policy is PLANNING REPORTlZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?16l0 DON MOORE LANE

15

Page 62 of 189

Section 2 - Vision

Section 2.2 Interpretation of Vjsion Statement … “rura/ characteY’ … Other factors which define the community as being rura/ include: large, uncrowded residential /ots; private water and septic systems; mixture of wood/ands, bush, agricultura/ fields and open /andscapes… The subject site is primarily in a natural state featuring dense vegetation and dramatic rock outcrops. The west (waterside) addition adds a second storey to an existing structure and therefore will not iriterfere with the natural features of the site. The east (rear) addition is Iocated in an already cleared area and will be barely visible from the water. The use of wood siding and other natural building materials will assist in blending the structure in with the natural landscape. The proposed additions maintain the character of the area. Section 4 - Goals and Objectives Section 4. 7 Natura/ Heritage Goa/

The natural beauty of South Frontenac Township’s /akes, forests and rural Iandscape is its predominant asset. /t is the Natural Heritage Goal of this Officia/ P/an to preserve and enhance South Frontenac Township’s ell vironmental quality for the enjoyment of future generations, whi/e realizing its economic potential To accomp/ish this, development

decisions wi// be made from a long term cumulative impact point of view which protects the natura/ heritage systems with within the Township. a) Objectives /.

To promote sustainable development that meets the needs of the present wjthout compromjsjng the abjlity of future generations to meet their own needs.

An Environmental Site Evaluation has been prepared which indicates that both the second storey addition and proposed east addition and carport will not negatively impact the natural environment. A new tertiary septic system will be installed which will result in a modest net benefit to Dog Lake through the reduction of nutrient input into the Iake. //.

To approach planning decisions on an ecosystem basis, an approach that recognizes the interconnection of a// /iving organisms, inc/uding humans, to their environment and to each other.

As noted above, the ESA indicates there will be no impact on the natural heritage features or the ecological functions of the site. ///.

To consider the cumulative impacts of p/annjng decisions, recognizing that deve/opment proposa/s cannot be addressed only on an i’ndividual basi’s i’n iso/ation from past and future decisions.

The subject lot was created under a prior policy and regulatory framework. Therefore, it is of a size and shape that does not allow for a building envelope outside of the 30 metre water setback. In this context, it is reasonable to

expect that any building alterations/additions will also occur within the 30 metre setback. With respect to the current application, best efforts have been made to minimize impacts and avoid negative cumulative impacts. The west addition involves adding a second storey to a portion of the cottage. This will not result in further encroachment on the water setback. The proposed east addition has been located as far away from Dog Lake as is reasonable and possible. The ESA indicates this is the most appropriate location for an

PLANNING REPORTIZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTi 1610 DON MOORE LANE

17

Page 63 of 189

with relatively deep soil. In this context, it is reasonable to expect that any building improvements, such as additions, will also occur within the 30 metre setback and directly attached to the existing structure. The Township’s Official Plan recognizes its Iong standing lakeside developments by establishing the above referenced three tests to assess the appropriateness of additions to buildings already located within the 30 metre setback. By providing these criteria, the Official Plan is effectively recognizing modern development standards while limiting hardships placed on landowners resulting from historical development situations.

Test # 7 - Is it too big? (gross floor area, building foot print and lot coverage) The Official Plan does not provide direction on what constitutes an appropriate level of intensification on a Iot that contains existing development within 30 metres of the highwater mark. As a result of a lack of direction in the Official Plan or any guideline documents Township Staff have typically looked to the zoning by-Iaw to come up with an opinion on size to control the scale of development on any given lot. Although the lot is riarrovv, it contains extensive water frontage and private road frontage that exceed the by-law requirements providing a wide vista of mostly natural shoreline. At 170 square metres, the footprint of the existing and proposed development covers only 2.7 percent of the total lot area. When combined with the footprints of other structures on the site (shed, gazebo,

boathouse/bunkie) the coveraqe is 4.8 percent, still within the coverage requirement of the zoning by-law.

Another measure for determining whether additional height and/or gross floor area is appropriate used by the Township is lot occupancy, which is a ratio of the total gross floor area to Iot area. Again, this direction is not directly stipulated in policy but has been traditionally used by Township Staff to measure appropriateness. The original cottage has a gross floor area of 158.1 square metres (1,702 sq ft) including the decks. This will increase to 252 square metres (2,713 sq. ft) with the proposed additions and decks. This means that the lot occupancy for the primary structure will only increase by1.5 percent (from 2.5 percent to 4.0 percent) with the proposed additions. Furthermore, a portion of the addition area already supports a covered frame deck area, further minimizing the overall level of intensification of the development.

In conclusion, we are of the opinion that the first test is passed. The proposed additions

represent a minor increase in floor area relative to the overall lot size and compared to the established scale of development.

Test # 2 - Is it too close? (the doseness of the existing dwelling to the high water mark) At its closest point, the deck from the existing cottage is located 6.3 metres from the

highwater mark. The building is set back close to 9 m. The riear vertical drop from the top of the bedrock to the water provides a further separation of approximately 6 metres. The

proposed expansion involves the addition of a second storey above an existing enclosed porch. While this addition increases the overall gross floor area of the cottage, it does not result in a further encroachment on the setback from the highwater mark. A letter (included

in the appendix to this report) has beeri provided from the designer attesting to the fact that the building as it stands today, sits on the original footprint of the dwelling.

The proposed development is also appropriate from a technical/environmental perspective. An Environmental Site Assessment was prepared which found that both the second storey

addition and the proposed east addition will not negatively impact the natural heritage

PLANNING REPORTiZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l6l0 DON MOORE LANE

19

Page 64 of 189

Test # 3 - Can it be built somewhere else? (the capacity of the lot to accommodate new development at a greater distance from the lake)

i

Despite its reasonable large size, the subject property is of a shape and layout that provides a very Iimited building envelope when taking into account the 30 metre highwater mark setback, rear yard setback and side yard setbacks (see Figure 7). The site is further constrained by the topography and terrain. l

l

/”

i c,kl1c:’m

I

i

l

14–

r.bQt .1 itAll 13Nh?.l

j

.‘i-a

E

%’

l l

a’ 4a,??, i.il:J

X-

f’

t

l

Th

r

..??r? L’:s:?I’ t…

.<S 0

i

=? ,? it –?.s’- -

+. A, ‘i x! ‘.r*l!i’,’.(3:h.

I

J

0

7-

M,

0 +

i

,A ,“f

$.i .1>

(! <

i!!{‘rt MilVlJl’l’’;J M%sal0NlllUn

S, S,

=, ‘y.

?!, ,‘y

‘y.>,’>X

y

l

l

a:.?v

v,S? -l” X

i

i

%X’J

I-’?r I Igl=VL’k’.?-aJ

i

y

a}, l ?–%=i -G.

=:=?‘r?’=-? :-:’:::;’:

l ;-A.- –l

j?’

l

F

/’

..-1 –.—–l

/

/

#l#h4a*%%N?444

:’:’-T?.1:i’-

:.:?:"-I”’::-

i=

I

/’

-.!?-.

L

-::Nrr p…?i.h’? ‘.i

P- ‘fi:’. ?-lr ? ==4"-?:r"!

‘4’.?;??r’ k ‘? T?-*?1?’

i

1

? ?=..-l

i

Based on the as-of-right building envelope and the site’s physical constraints, requiring the owner to remove and relocate the addition would cause undue hardship. Alternatively, it is

proposed that through thoughtful design, impacts can be reasonably mitigated in a way that satisfies the policies of the Official Plan while also allowing the owner to modestly expand on the existing dwelling which is a legal non-complying structure. Measures include ensuring that the building does not further encroach on the water, constructing the new east addition as far away from the lake as reasonably possible and installing a new tertiary septic system outside of the 30 metre water setback which will in fact result in a net improvement.

In conclusion, we are of the opinion that the third test is passed. The lot is not of a shape and nature to reasonably accommodate new development at a greater distance from the lake.

PLANNING REPORTIZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT?l6l0 DON MOORE LANE

21

Page 65 of 189

C./’

20NIN!;jj?D

? Al’AICl’lll+lAl zcw? iAl [?]puitii ziw 111111 ‘fflffi iimii+siai’wqymkzcw.lq.sl

44 r

k

4

“(/)

b

I.?.)ITED VltVlC! Ql !ffllilAl Z(4. !L,.<

ljlJA(t lltlllli Ie (XlnMl . .’. (llill {!IJNT IS-L iki. . . } i

0

{.l&tlnllli.k<r IltAlDF)fflAl r..]lhJtl:% .11(.?.il

m

PESIC’ENilAl20Ne:Qi I.tXlllE h :yi-. uK4:NTl4?2t aIr .’.hxcri

a

Lsq8§

umrw hssioesn* . pys’i iiMaitt’y ts arc lliml: {IhfiJflNlIAl.M4lJ€C-II-‘il’lQtNL{i.l<}

? u? rsxnpie aeiwxmiai. z? ;i *xbs

5%

§vrumcc*stcb-+ai.zcxa. ?QI;. 11 V.Ql?AYIO)uL Q t? C [? *.l}.1’ M l.k. l’elNl 1 ih; !

80

‘,1?5

CO

X

v

? umas o?.w.taciai zc*< iUal PUl’lAl. INDIJSiPIA(ZONf’ lGi,

al

%S/ !0 zS

P 4 ]. 7

Tl ,:t ,,Q;=

.RRC33

l

‘.,I{l

The proposed zoning for the site will consist of a site specific RLSW zone that addresses the following provisions:

i-* * g 0 i 8s-,h*@8 m m

Lot Area (min.)

10,000 sq. metres

6,273 sq. metres

Existing Situation

Lot Frontage on a private lane (min.) Water Frontage (min)

76 metres

113.2 metres

i

m?-metres -

160 metre’s '

l-

Front Yard (min.) (water)

30 metres

N/A

N/A

Rear Yard (min.)

10 metres

14.5 metres

i

Interior Side Yard (min.)

3 metres

24.7 metres

{

Exterior Side Yard (min.)

10 metreS

N/A

N/A

Lot Coverarge (max.) "

5o/o

Cottage: 2.7%

{

Accessory Structures: 1.8%

Building Height (max.)

11 metres

8 metreS

i i

PLANNING REPORTlZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTl 1610 DON MOORE LANE

23

Page 66 of 189

“*1

**

*@Y-Y’

i ; m 1 a mw

n a*

setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody or watercoorse, then said building may be repaired, reriovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. ln addition, no living space shall be added below grade to any existing building or structure.

@mb

l

0”

k*

a

!; J

height.

Required.

Appropriateness of Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment The reliefs required for minimum lot area, setback from the highwater mark and setback from the top of bank are all required to reflect the existing situation. The west addition will not increase the level of non-compliance with respect to setback from the highwater mark since it involves a second storey addition on the existing enclosed porch footprint. The east addition will extend away from the water and will respect the rear and interior side yard setback requirements.

Relief is being requested to permit an increase in the gross floor area and height of the building which is already Iocated within the 30 metre setback from the highwater mark. Height has been increased over a portion of the cottage where a second storey has been added over an existing enclosed porch. This increase is appropriate from both a visual and environmental perspective. Natural building materials have been used so that the addition blends with the landscape when viewed from the water. Correspondence submitted by neighbouring residents express support for the addition, noting that the work completed “aligns with the general theme of the original home and the surrounding lakeside homes”. As noted previously, Ecological Services has no concerns from a environmental perspective. The rear addition will result in a modest increase in gross floor area and will be located as far away from Dog Lake as possible.

Finally, and as discussed above in detail, the proposal meets the tests of Section 5.2.7 of the Official Plan, which sets out criteria for determining the appropriateness of new additions to existing buildings Iocated within the 30 metre highwater mark setback..

Conclusion

ri

/

/

The Township contains many dwellings that were constructed before the current Official Plan and Zoning By-laws were implemented. In recognizing this, the Official Plan contains a series of tests to evaluate changes to development that is legally non-conforming or noncomplying. This planning report demonstrates that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is appropriate because the development conform with the intent of the Official Plan in that: Section 4 encourages site alterations that improve existing conditions. This development will see net improvements through the replacement of the septic system and potentially, through the site plan control process, should the Township choose to utilize this tool. As noted, Site Plan Control could be used to re-naturalize the *

PLANNING REPORTiZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTi 1610 DON MOORE LANE

25

Page 67 of 189

l

S

!i ! ’ .!li’) " Z

?

o ‘;;?)ai ’l ? . oz )-uiy

5?1 ‘1,

a= Li

l

" o*: ’ Cl

l–IS

(

11 '

l

‘cl y<, ; :’

liii

ilil ilii ‘.

l l l l ’ l l ;li:’ ?.;iii’ rol? .i ,011. '

.1 l -) i’L

it

*..;’ ?l??’-’:-j-7’, ?’,:Jx,2’,

J’

!‘i

l

l l ?L

,?,? I

l

I

{’

:i’i

:i s li l

.’l

?,

—l l?

i

-!-l

l

i

l

l

.?}

l

t’

S

la ’ ??-= =t }.7 ??. l

c (0

CL (l) -4-J

(Q g

<

‘::

X

11

l

U c G)

a>’,,i -l.jI

,9 ()

Zl .aa

jl

l: i{?

1

)

k

l:’

‘-“a–/ tf

i

a a

<

:9€

u

?,. C>

-;*’-sk

.11 11’

oo

Page 68 of 189

10. Appendix C - Proposed Zoning PLSW-X

Notwithstanding anything in this by-law to the contrary, the lands zoned Site Specific Limited Service Residential Waterfront shall be used only in accordance with the following: (a) The minimum required setback from the highwater mark shall be 6.0 m fo?r the deck and 8.5 m for the dwelling

(b) The minimum required setback from the top of bank shall be 1.0 m for the deck and 6.0 m for the dwelling

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5.10.2, the maximum permitted gross floor area (including decks) of the principal dwelling shall be 255 square metres.

Page 69 of 189

4-

Perspective Views Inc 45 Robert Street Hamilton ON L8L 2N9

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 Planning & Building Department Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON KOH 2TO Project Address: Building Permit No.:

1610 Don Moore Lane 12 252923 BLD 00 SR

City Response Letter:

To whom it may concern, this letter is in regards to an issue regarding the original footprint of the dwelling, that has been brought to my attention by the owner of the property Don Stricelj. The owner originally approached me to complete design drawings, during the time that he was repairing the original sunroom that was significantly damaged by a previous storm. l was then asked to come up with a design that involved a second story addition to tie into the existing dwelling. To the best of my knowledge l believe that what has been built as it stands today, sits on the original footprint of the dwelling. I hope this helps clarify any outstanding issues in this regard.

Sincerely,

J.? q.!. Matthew Ribau - Perspective Views Inc.

Page 70 of 189

PLANNING REPORT PUBLIC MEETING Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: July 5, 2016

Planning Department File No. Z-16/08

Date of Report: June 27, 2016 Subject: Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment, Part of Lot 11, Concession I, Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Tripp

Summary of the Recommendation The recommendation is that Council consider passage of a zoning by-law amendment that would rezone a proposed new waterfront lot and the retained lot to recognize their small size. The rezoning is a condition of Consent Application S-11-16-S.

Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is to bring to Council an application for a zoning bylaw amendment and to hold a public meeting on the application as required under the terms of the Planning Act. The report includes a location attachment, a lot configuration map, and an amending by-law.

Background An application has been submitted to amend the Township’s Comprehensive Zoning By-law to rezone land located at Loughborough Lake in Storrington. The rezoning would apply to a proposed new lot and the retained portion following from Consent Application S-11-16-S. The Committee of Adjustment gave approval to the consent application on April 14, 2016 on the condition that the new lot and the retained be rezoned. Attachment #1 shows the subject land. The subject land is 1.21 hectares (3 ac.) in size with frontage on Loughborough Lake. The consent application proposes to create a new one acre parcel with 150 feet of waterfrontage from this land. The retained portion would be two acres with 300 feet of waterfrontage. Both portions are accessed by Sandpiper Lane which bisects the property and another right-of way through the land gives access to an abutting property on the southwest. Attachment #2 shows the development on the land and these rights-of-way. Both the new lot and the retained lot are fully developed with a cottage and outbuildings and each has its own septic system. Thus, each portion is effectively a fully functioning separate lot.

Discussion The land itself still retains much of its original vegetation and contains heavy mature trees through much of its area. The topography from immediately behind the cottage to the rear lot line of the proposed new lot is very precipitous and offers restrictions to development due to the steep slope and lack of space owing to the presence of the rights-of-way through the property.

Page 71 of 189

Official Plan The lands are designated Rural in the Official Plan. The Plan permits lakefront development as proposed, however, it specifies that only one dwelling be permitted per lot. It requires that new waterfront lot creation should generally be one hectare in size and have 91 metres of waterfrontage. Furthermore, this portion of Loughborough Lake is identified as being “at capacity” (formerly called highly sensitive) for development - meaning that the province intends that there be no new development around such waterbodies to protect lake trout habitat. The objective of this lake designation is to prevent any new sources of nutrient loading to the lake Within the Official Plan, section 7.1 ‘General Consent Policies’, permits special consideration for existing lots of record which contain two separate dwellings. In the case of this application, there are two completely separate dwellings ie., one year-round home (on the retained) and one seasonal cottage (on the proposed new lot). Dividing the lot would effectively place each dwelling on its own parcel of land – consistent with the intent of the Plan in this regard. Thus, the result of creating the lot would be a parcel that does not meet the provisions of the Plan in terms of minimum lot size and frontage but a lot that would at least satisfy the provision of the Plan noted above. It is justified in the fact that any adverse effects of the existing development already exist and creating the new lot is not exacerbating these effects. Recommendations in an environmental report dated December 1, 2015 from Ontario Lake Assessments, outlines the fact that the new lot would be small and that the sensitive lake should be protected but the report ultimately gives support for the proposal with restrictions placed in the amending zoning by-law. Similarly, the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority supports the application – again with restrictions. Prior to submission of the application the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change commented that they agree with the approach. These documents are attached for reference as Attachment #3. Zoning The land is zoned Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW) recognizing its residential use and private lane access. The zoning amendment would change the zone on the new lot and the retained lot to acknowledge their smaller size and reduced lake frontage. It would also place restrictions on the new lot to permit future development that is not larger than the existing development and to require that new development be located further from the lake. Two special RLSW zones are proposed for this.

Agency Comments All agencies commented in favour of the proposal at the consent stage including the CRCA and the MOECC as noted above. Comments from KFL&A Public Health are also attached to Attachment #3. No comments have been received from the public in response to the circulation of the application.

Conclusion In consideration of the above review, it is this Department’s conclusion that the re-zoning to recognize that the special circumstances of the new and retained lots can be supported. The environmental report from Ontario Lake Assessments and the CRCA report both support the application requiring that restrictions be put on further development on the small lot. These restrictions would limit the size of any new construction to only the size of the existing seasonal dwelling ie., a footprint of 850 ft.2. However, the Planning Department would also recommend that any new development be located at a minimum distance from the lake of 36 metres (98 ft.). This would place the building between the two rights-of-way that cut through the property. The lot offers challenges to this building placement because of the steepness of the land and

Page 72 of 189

the presence of the two private lanes but careful measurement by Planning has determined that this setback is possible. Specifically, a special zone on the retained land would acknowledge its size of two acres. The special zone on the new lot would:

acknowledge its size of only 1 acre, acknowledge its waterfrontage of only 51 metres (167 ft.), specify that any new dwelling to be constructed must be limited to a 2 2 maximum gross floor area of 800 ft. and a maximum footprint of 850 ft. require new construction to be a minimum of 36 metres from the lake.

Based on the above, the zoning amendment application can be supported.

Recommendation On the basis of the above review, it is recommended that the attached zoning amending By-law No. 2016-41, to change the zone on the retained portion of land from RLSW to Special RLSW- 112 and to change the zone on the new lot from RLSW to Special RLSW- 113, be considered for passage. Submitted/approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills,

TrippRezoningReport

Page 73 of 189

f,loj’

Attachment #1 N

W-

E

l

s

d

/

Loughborough Lake

l

?

Qt Property J /

i

11

l

7 l

m

< l s

T

{

/

/

/

s

I

220

330

1 Meters 440

l

11 l

l

l s

t

ffl

s

l

s

l

I?

l

0 55 110

1

y

s

s

I l

1

I l

l

/

[

/ /

l I

S l

Page 74 of 189

ATTACHMENT #2 ‘11

l

#:

13 !4 {4 1

:“j

c

/Ng

c

;lb t

o’

kl% %i ‘:

Ah -01 kl

%i

’l

%4

.la

%e:I+%

14

r 1,1 -l

:€

11

,q,

‘k'2 .. .9 ’l’ @?’.?

i’ p

:i;!

.V

? J= !

v

t:

J}

lli b

t

i

(6

§ig

y. IA

itJj ki

!l

1(

(

l-.

..:- Ai

a-l 1,4

:;,

N

l l ’t

t

i,

J!A

%

,:

l

ll:’

?.S?ii '

ij

aNl A

3 4,

H

jl;,

c

1’?bC*

C;

i-i

k

A J

/

’ i:l] ?.!v

‘?, !l

e

i)

,‘M’ .fl.:-,-. l

l

s

li’i,2y

,,7 “=lj,:-;:, , l.m:E=-

7

3; . iU-lAfU .s%

.l? l ,

.;i{s, 4 oFlJ r.ql %’l

.t *

,rt 4

’e.ab l ??, s

I ?’,3

2 1 k ,.??i

Ai-:. l

j

i l

l l

l }

s

k

l’

t

Kx;%-i rs

a”

I

Q t

‘0 01 9

8;1%%T i* ‘-J !

l

i

I

l

l

t

.5

r r

l;, ii!

l

1l1i(%‘il.’ i .

t*.

-tl 01, (

r*l?

’l

! ?li

+-l

.1

V. ?

h

(i

M

ly

!,l ) .

0

I l

Page 75 of 189

QLA Ibb.?a?‘Ib+.

’l’ %@,4.

4.aa.a’a9..6, :.%?a<!‘ial,

RR#3 Harrowsmith Ontario KOH IV0

& Environmental Education Services

Tel: (613) 376-3863 Fax: (613) 376-6128

“4k,?,,,,,a.a:,,:i>al,

‘i u, :!? M/Iaa,, f.

1 December 2015

i

aA.‘Ala,.j74:. V’iUk

Ontario Lake Assessments

ATTACHMENT #3

Township of South Frontenac 4432 George Street Box 100

SYDENHAM, Ontario KOH 2T0

Attention: Lindsay Mills, Deputy Clerk/P]anning Coordinator REGARDS: Preliminary EIA - Applieation for Severance - Rosemarie Tripp- 1015 Sandpiper Lane - Part of Lot 52, Block B; Registered Plan 716; South Frontenac Township; (Storrington District) - Loughborough Lake (West Basin)

Dear Mr. Mills:

A site visit was conducted to the above location on November 25”’, 2015 to determine the possibility of attaining a severance. At present there are two residential structures on one parcel; one is a permanent residence, the other is used for seasonal cottage use; both buildings and their septic systems are located closer to the water than the 30 metre setbacks required to satisfy presentday standards on lakes; the front of the cottage and the septic are approximately 13 to 15 metres from the water.

The cottage is 750 ft2 in area with two bedrooms (considered a three bedroom as described by M. Tripp); it has an open concept kitchen-living room area and one bath that includes a toilet, shower and sink. The date of construction qf the cottage is not known but could be as early as the 1 960s. There is no record of a septic approval for the cottage. The cottage is serviced by a class IV septic system; the septic tank is located ? the cottage on the lakeside front west corner; the septic abed’ is located in front of the cottage with a weeping tile run (or runs) parallel the lakeshore (personal communication M. Tripp). There does not appear to be space for a conventional sized bed between the cottage and the shoreline. Neither the cottage nor the septic bed meet the current day standard of 30 metres for setback from the water. The septic bed is well within 15 metres of the top of bank for the shoreline. There is a lawn maintained over the indicated septic area as well as between the permanent residence and the cottage. A single storey lake access boat house is located in front of the cottage.

There is a long history of management efforts by both the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF) and the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (OMECC) to manage a lake trout fishery in Loughborough Lake. One aspect of that management effort is to protect the existing water quality for the survival of the lake trout population. The main concern with respect to water quality is the migration of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, from the land to the water. Phosphorus loadings to the lake increase with human disturbance near the lake such 2

Page 76 of 189

-2-

as the removal of the natural shoreline vegetation (trees and understory), the installation of lawns axid of course the migration of nutrients away from septic systems. The nutrient loading from septic systems increases with increased use; when cottages are converted to year round use the supply of nutrients to a septie bed inereases proportionally to the number of person-days of occupancy.

Inereased phosphorus coneentrations in the lake cause iiicreased algal growth in the water column and a deerease in oxygen levels iii the deep water portions of the lake. The deeline in oxygen levels ean become critical to the management of lake trout populations. Loughborough Lake has been modelled using the Ontario Lake Capaeity Model; this model predicts how a rake will respond to ehanges in nutrient supply. Loughborough Lake (West Basin) was determined to be highly sensitive using this metbodology; it was classified as such in the joint MOE/MNR report ‘Inland Lake Trout Managernent in Southeastern Ontario (January 1993); it is identified in the Official Plan (OP) for South Frontenac Township as highly sensitive. Since the writing of the OP, the

MOECC has collected more recent field data (August 3 0’l, 2005) and have also the applied a xnore restrictive oxygen objective in the re-evaluation of Loughborough Lake; the resu}t supports the

highly sensitive category and the lake is now designated aat capacity’. This designation does not allow for the creation of new lots and places very strict development standards on existing vacant Iots of record as well as all re-development. The objective of the designation is to prevem any new source of nutrient supply to the lake whi}e recognizing the possibility that vacant lots exist that may be developed but cannot meet the current day standards for lot sizes and setbacks on tbe lake. These lots may be developed using the best management praetices that can be achieved for the ioeaiion; in some eircumstances development may not be aceornrnodated at all.

Tlie situation for this property is somewhat different yet not an uncommon situation. It was a ‘common’ praetice decades ago, particularly where one family owned a large property, for family members to construet separate eottages on the same shared parcel of land. In later years applications eome before council to ereate separate lots. In the past, where the property size is large enough and all planning considerations can be aecomnmodated, severances have oceurred where cottages in existing use could be located on separate lots; this is more easily achieved on lakes with warm water fisheries and where there are less onerous aevelopment constraints than for locations on lakes managed for lake trout fisheries.

The proposal for this property is to sever the pucel to allow the existing seasonal residential use to be on a separate lot from the permanent residence; this would also satisfy the requirements of the Offieial Plan for Souih Frontenac Township whieh allows for oniy one principal residence per

lot. The existing residence was also a cottage at one tirne; a smal} portion of the original cottage is part of the structure of the now permanent residence. While the nutrient loading to the Iake firom eaeh of these stmetures is recognised and ongoing, one 3

Page 77 of 189

3

-1-

can argue that creating a new lot to accommodate each on a separate parcel does not increase the imtient loading and therefore there is no envirorirnental impact. A problem arises however when the cottage on the newly created lot becomes converted to permanent year round use and the nutrient loading to the lake proportionally increases with use. The proposal is to ereate a new undersized lot of O.4 ha (1.0 acre); this is eontrary to the OP which requires all waterfront lots to be I .O ha (2.47 ac) in size. The proposal also includes the ereation of a undersized lot in terms of water frontage; 45,7m (l 50’) instead of the required 9i .5 m (300’). The proposed lot also has some difficulties due to both topography and legal right-of-ways across the parcel. The newiy created ?ot will be transected by Sand Piper Lane at two different locals; once immediately behind the eottage and again further up the slope near to the entrance off of Cedar Ridges Laiie. The topography from immediately behind the cottage to the rear lot line of the proposed new lot is very precipitous and is not suitable as a location for a new septic system due to the steep slope and laek of space due to the lane crossings. This proposed lot does not provide space to re-locate a new eottage or permanent residenee with a new septic bed further back from the lake arid therefore support for the argument that a reduction in nutrient loading might be achieved. The eoncern wath the application is that it will lead to the cottage being converted to year roundl use on an undersized lot and therefore increase the nutrient Ioad to the lake; a permanent residenee inueases the nutrient supply by a factor of five. The recomunendation for approval of this lot should be conditional upon the cottage having the same footprint in the future with no provision for increasing the living space by way of adding a seeond storey. Also, in the event that the septic system fails in the future and needs replacing, a tertiary treatment system should be required.

If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to give me a call.

R:,:p'2” f7 yo?.’ d Genge B.Se. Ontario Lake Assessments

3654 Stage Coach Road RR# 3

HARROWSMITH, On. KOH ?VO

rgenge@ kos.net 613-376-3863

Copies to: Mr, Bill Bishop

Ms Rosemarie Tripp

338 Montreal Street

‘iOl5 Sandpiper Lane INVERARY, On

KINGSTON, On.

KOH ?XO

Box 1403

K7L 5C6

Page 78 of 189

k.!i?iii{ig?: i?l

CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORl’TY 1641 Perth Road, P.0. Box 160 C:leiib?irnie, Ontario KOH 150 Phone: (61 3) 546-4228 Toll Free (613 area code): 1-877-956-CRCA Fax: (613) 547-6474 E-mail: inro@crca.ca Websites: urwyv.crc,i.ca & www.cleanwatercataraqui.ca

Conservatioii ONTARIO .’s’.il::lil Uh.mil;?:.::?:

:@.

Febniary 29, 2016

File: SEV/FRS/27/2016

Sent by E-mail Ms. Jennie Kapusta, Plam’iing Assistaiit Township of South Frontenac p.o. Box 100

Sydenliam, Ontatio KOH 2TO

Dear Ms. Kapusta:

Re: ApplicationforConsenttoSeverS-11-16-S(Tripp) Lot 11, Concession 1; 1007 & 1015 Sandpiper Lane Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac Waterbody: Loughborough Lake (west basin)

Staff of the Cataraqui Regioii Coiiservation Authority (CRCA) Jiave reviewed the above-noted application for consent to sever mid offer the following comments for the Land Divisioii Committee’s consideration. The site was visited by CRCA staff on February 26, 2016. ' Summary of the Proposal

The applicant has requested severance of a O.45 hectare parcel of land with approxitnately 45.7 metres of water frontage on Loughborough Lake. The lot to be severed presently contains a cottage dwelling, and it is proposed that this lot will continue to be used for residential / recreational purposes. The lot to be retained would be approximately O.78 hectares in area, and will remain as a residential property. Site Description

The subject property is located on the west basin of Loughborough Lake. The topography of the site can be characterized as sloping gradually down from Sandpiper Lane to the south to Loughborough Lake to the north. The property consists of a mixture of wooded and open areas. The property is designated ‘Rural’ in the Official Plan and zoned ‘Limited Service Residential Waterfront’ (RLSW) in the implementing Zoning By-law. The west basin of Loughborough Lake is identified as a liiglily sensitive Lake Trout Lake in the Official Plan for the Township of Soutlt Frontenac.

Page 79 of 189

MS. Jennie Kapusta (S-] l-16-S) February 29, 2016

Discussion

Tl’ie maiii interest of the CRCA iyi this proposal is the protection of water quality of Lougliborough Lake and the avoidance of natural hazards (e.g. flooding arid erosion) associated with the slioreline. Natural Hazards

Flooding: Tlie maximum recorded water level for Lougliborough Lake is 125.03 metres geodetic. For Lougliborough Lake, the maximum recorded water level is used iii lieu of air engiiieered flood plain. The CRCA Plaiining Policy req?iires all development and site alteration to be setback a minimum of 6 metres from the regulatory floodplaiii of a waterbody. Based upon site observations arid inappiiig information, tl’ie existing structures are not subject to flood risk.

Erosion: For stable slopes, the CRCA defines the extent of potential erosion hazards to include the slope, pius air access allowance of 6 metres. Based upon site observations arid mappiiig infonnation, the existing stmctures are not subject to erosion hazards. Water Quality Section 2.2 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) suggests that plannixig authorities sl’iould seek to protect, improve or restore the qumlity and q?iantity of water. Accordiiigly, the Official Plan and Zoiiing By-law for the Township of South Frontenac provide guidance with respect to how development should occur in consideration of protectiiig, improving arid restoring water quality within the municipality. Similarly, the CRCA’s Planning Policy (April, 2015) contaiiis provisions that seek to support these objectives. As noted above, the west basiii of Loughborougli Lake is classified as a highly sensitive Lake Trout

Lake, and as such, the waterbody is afforded additional protection to ensure development does xiot negatively impact the water quality of the lake. A preliminary environmental impact assessment has been completed by Ontario Lake Assessments (Reginald Genge) dated December 1, 2015. Staff share the concerns raised by Mr. Genge with respect to the potential conversion of the seasonal cottage to a year-round residence and the associated impacts on the lake’s water quality. Recommendation

Stqif recommend that the nmnicipalit)i consider placing a site specgfic zone onto the sesiered parcel to ensure that there viiill be nofitture opporttmih7for expansion qf the living space (upward or outward) of the existing dwelling as suggested in Aifr. Genge’s i-epoii.

Staff have no objection to the approval of application S-ll- 16-S based on our consideration for natural hazards, natural heritage, and water quality and quantity protection policies. Please note that a portion of the retained and severed parcels are subject to Ontario Regulation 148/06: Development, Interference with Wetlmids, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses, which is admiiiistered by the CRCA. Tlie purpose of the regulation is to ensure that proposed changes (e.g. development and site alteratioii) to a property are riot affected by natural hazards, such as flooding and erosion, and that the changes do not put other properties at greater risk from these hazards. Withiii a regulated area, written permission must be obtaiiied from the CRCA prior to development taking p]ace. Present arid future laiidowi’iers are required to contact the CRCA to determine the need for a permit.

Page 2 of 3

Page 80 of 189

Ms. Jennie Kapusta (S- l]- 16-S) Febniary 29. 2016

Please iiiform this office of any decision made by the Committee with regard to this application. if you

?iave airy questions, please contact the undersigned at 613-546-4228 ext. 244, or by e-mail at aschmidt@crca.ca

Yours truly,

..,il.

4 . x, ; ? ? . . . S i " " [1 <—Q.)???-L?’

Andrew Schmidt, C. Tech. Development Review Maiiager /as c.c.

Rosemarie Tripp, 1015 Sandpiper Lane, Inverary, ON, KOH ?XO '

T

Page 3 of 3

Page 81 of 189

Lindsay Mills From:

Castro, Victor (MOECC) Victor.Castro@ontario.ca

Sent:

December-10-15 9:06 AM

To:

Lindsay Mills RE: Tripp Proposed Severance

Subject:

Hi Lindsay,

Your approach seems reasonable and is consistent with past practice to allow a severance to divide existing cottages/dwellings. l also agree with rezoning the properties to not increase the footprint. l have seem too many cases where a small cottage is replaced with a large home very close to the shoreline and on a postage stamp lot. Thanks for sending me the information. Regards Victor Castro

Senior Aquatic Scientist Eastern Region MOECC

TASKalfa 2551ci

[00:17:c8:07:e4:92]

1

Page 82 of 189

l

l it ta r. g ts

IP’ouh?U.cHealth+++ CONSENT TO SEVER INSPECTION HFILE-NO. -” - j RECEIPT No. , S-11-16-S , SK-6-16

1

‘Lot '

Owner

Concession

Part Lot 52

U

Sub-lot

Plan

716

l

Rosemarie Tripp

E

Township l

l

Storrington, South Frontenac Geneml Description (existing buildings, surface dminage, slopes, etc. [on each part and pmposed water SIIPPIY) l

Severed - Dwelling, boathouse, cliff towards water ,

• Rocky Retained - House, shed, boathouse, sloped towards water

lSoil type, depth, water table on mch part of likely )eaching bed areas. lndicate water table with bar. Show estimated permmbility (good), fair, poor) for mch part where natural soil is acceptable. Severed DepthorSoil(metres) Retained Testholel

i

12 inches soil .3 .6

Testhole2 Rock .9 6 inches to rock 1.2 1.5

Percolation rate (estimated) Perco}ation mte (estimated) . . . Suitability for on site sewage disposal:

NOTE: The appmval or any new lot is basal on it’s suitability to pmvide an arm for a Class 4 septic tank systern ror an avemge 3 bedmom home. Appmva( j tobuildalargerhomeonthislotwillbesubjecttoavailabiliiyofsufficientareaforalarBerseptictanksystem. . . . Conditions: Severed X Satisfactory l-

Should the current septic fail, the property will most likely have to be serviced by a holding tank

’ Cl Unsatisfactory

l

’ Q SiteFlexible

l

l

Cl Site Specific

R

Conditions:

.1

Cl Satisfactory

’ € Unsatisfactory

i

Q Site Flexible

l

Cl Site Specific hispector: Miranda Iezzi, C.P.H.I.(C)

Date:

Approved:

mDo

April 4, 2016

:7;?7

PLEASE FORWARD A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DECISION TO PUBLJC HEALTH

Personal information on thts rom is couected under the authority or the Building Code Act and will be usal ror the administration or Public Healffi programs. Any questions about the collection of this uiformatton should be dtrectal to die Managa, Environmaital Haildi, KF[AA Public Heakh, 2 21 Ponsmouth Avenue, Kingston, Ontmio K7M I V5, 613-549-1232 ext. 1243. 1-800-267-7875

#7-70-120

Page 83 of 189

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 Time: 6:00 PM Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 21 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Norm Roberts, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Presentation of Volunteer Recognition Awards - 6:00 pm

a)

Volunteer Recipients and invited guests met for light refreshments prior to the presentation of awards at 6:40 pm The following individuals were recipients of the Volunteer Award for 2015:  Linda Bates  Wilma Kenny  Eileen Sleeth  Rachael Smith-Tryon

Call to Order - Regular Meeting - 7:06 pm

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-21-1 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT the Council meeting of June 21, 2016 be called to order at 7:06 p.m. Carried

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland declared a pecuniary interest with respect to Agenda Item 8(e).

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Public Meeting

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-21-2 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT a public meeting be held to discuss planning matters related to:  Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 6, Concession V, Bedford Carried

b)

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment in Part of Lot 6, Concession V, Bedford Lindsay Mills explained that the purpose of this application is to rezone three new residential lots on James Wilson Road at Canoe Lake from Rural to Residential. Two of the proposed lots and the retained lot would have frontage

Page 84 of 189

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 on a new lane that would be constructed off James Wilson Road while one new lot would fully front on James Wilson Road. Mr. Mills also noted the review of the setback requirement from the water and that Lot 3 is required to have a 45 metre setback. Deputy Mayor Sutherland questioned the lot location that has the 45 metre setback requirement and if there is a site specific site plan in place. Mr. Mills noted that the west lot that is beside the retained lot requires the 45 metre setback and confirmed there will be a site specific site plan for the lots. Otto Peter, who owns property directly to the west, asked if the applicant will have to have wells drilled as he had been told he would have to drill wells on both the severed and retained and upgrade the road when he had asked about severing his property. Mr. Mills explained that when properties are waterfront there is not a requirement to drill wells as it is presumed they will have access to water directly from the lake. There were no other comments from the public. Resolution No. 2016-21-3 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT an opportunity having been provided, the public meeting be closed. Carried 7.

Approval of Minutes

a)

Council Meeting of June 7, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-21-4 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approve the minutes of the June 7, 2016 Council Meeting. Carried

b)

Committee of the Whole meeting of June 14, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-21-5 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council approve the minutes of the June 14, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting. Carried

Business Arising from the Minutes

a)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program

• Intake Two Resolution No. 2016-21-6 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Revill

Page Page 85 of 2 189 of 7

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 THAT Council endorse the staff recommendation of Storrington Centre being submitted as the project for funding under the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program - Intake Two. Carried b)

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Vendor of Record Listing Resolution No. 2016-21-7 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council approves the attached Vendor of Record Listing. Carried

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Capital Budget Amendments Resolution No. 2016-21-8 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approve the amended 2016 Linear Asset Capital Budget as presented on June 14, 2016. Carried

d)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Organizational Review This item was considered part of Agenda Item 8(f)

e)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Prison Farms Resolution No. 2016-21-9 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council support the reestablishment of the Prison Farm Program and that this be communicated to the applicable parties. Carried

f)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - CAO’s Recommendations on the Organizational Review from June 7, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-21-10 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT the CAO’s Organizational Review recommendations #2 -5, defeated June 7, be brought back for reconsideration. Carried Resolution No. 2016-21-11 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council adopt the 2016 CAO organizational review recommendations effective July 1, 2016 Amendment:

Page Page 86 of 3 189 of 7

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Councillor Roberts AND THAT the 2016 changes proposed within recommendation #2 be amended to exclude the relocation of the Public Works Manager

Resolution No. 2016-21-12 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT the motions and amendments be referred to Corporate Services Committee. Carried Resolution No. 2016-21-13 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT recommendations #3 to 5 be referred to the Corporate Services Committee. Carried 9.

Reports Requiring Action

a)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Review of Request to Remove Holding Symbol Part of Part Lot 8, Concession V, Loughborough See By-law 2016-39

b)

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Request to Permit a Special Event Celebration - Part Lot 25, Concession V, Storrington Resolution No. 2016-21-14 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT Council authorize an exemption from By-law 2015-41 (the Noise By-law) to permit an outdoor wedding celebration to take place on June 25, 2016 on property described as Part of Lot 25, Concession V, Storrington District, municipally known as 4587 Kauffman Lane. Carried

Committee Meeting Minutes

a)

Loughborough Canada Day Committee meeting of May 26, 2016

b)

Loughborough Recreation Committee meeting of April 25, 2016

c)

South Frontenac Recreation meeting of May 16, 2016 Mayor Vandewal removed himself as Chair to speak to this resolution and propose an amendment. Deputy Mayor Sutherland called for the vote on this resolution after which Mayor Vandewal assumed the chair. Resolution No. 2016-21-15 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning

Page Page 87 of 4 189 of 7

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 THAT Council supports the South Frontenac Recreation Committee recommendation to conduct a feasibility study to pursue a skateboard park in Centennial Park in Harrowsmith as amended. Carried. AMENDMENT: Moved by Mayor Vandewal Seconded by Councillor Sleeth AND THAT staff wait until the ongoing recreation survey is completed before undertaking the feasibility study. Carried d)

Public Services Committee meeting of April 21, 2016

e)

Public Services Committee meeting of May 19, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-21-16 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT Council receives for information the minutes of the following committee meetings:  Loughborough Canada Day Committee meeting of May 26, 2016  Loughborough Recreation Committee meeting of April 25, 2016  South Frontenac Recreation Committee meeting of May 16, 2016  Public Services Committee meeting of April 21, 2016  Public Services Committee meeting of May 19, 2016 Carried

By-Laws

a)

By-law 2016-38 - Rezone Con V, Part Lot 6 Bedford Resolution No. 2016-21-17 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Rpberts THAT the following by-laws be given first and second reading:  By-law 2016-38  By-law 2016-39 Carried Resolution No. 2016-21-18 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-38, being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended, to rezone lands from Special Limited Service Residential Zone (RLS-2) to Waterfront Residential Zone (RW), Limited Service Residential-Waterfront Zone (RLSW) and Special Limited Service Residential-Waterfront Zone (RLSW-111) ; Part Lot 6, Concession V, District of Bedford, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

b)

By-law 2016-39 - Remove Holding Symbol - Con V, Part Lot 8; Loughborough

Page Page 88 of 5 189 of 7

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-21-19 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Roberts THAT By-law 2016-39, being a by-law to remove the holding “H” symbol from the Zoning Map of Zoning By-law 2003-75 as amended; Part of Lot 8, Concession V, Loughborough District, be given third reading signed and sealed. Carried 12.

Reports for Information

a)

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing

b)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Ontario Waste Management Association Mayor Vandewal noted the appointment of Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager to the Ontario Waste Management Association.

c)

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Environmental Cleanup in Hartington

Information Items

a)

Michelle Foxton & Wade Leonard, re: June 14, 2016 Committee of the Whole Item #6e

b)

Around the Rideau Newsletter - May-June 2016

c)

Bob Chiarelli, Minister of Energy, re: response to Large Renewable Procurement resolution

d)

Mike Palecek, Nation President, CUPW, re: Federal Government Review of Public Postal Service

e)

Michael Jacek, Senior Advisor, AMO, re: Basic Income Guarantee

Notice of Motions

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland served notice of motion with respect to the June 14, 2016 Agenda Item 6 g) and that the applicant should only pay for his own legal fees.

Announcements

a)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland provided an update on the success of the Cyclefest in Verona and Skills course at Perth Road Public School.

b)

Councillor Sleeth asked about the conditions on the Johnston Point Development and ongoing surveillance to ensure these conditions are being followed. Lindsay Mills reported that he will be conducting a site inspection this week.

c)

Councillor Schjerning acknowledged the participation of the Sydenham Station firefighters, the OPP and paramedics who attended the Loughborough Public School Family Fun Night. Mayor Vandewal commended the firefighters for attending the Cyclefest in Verona.

Page Page 89 of 6 189 of 7

Minutes of Council June, 21, 2016 d)

Councillor McDougall referred to the brochure he distributed from the County of Frontenac and the City of Kingston regarding the 2015 Report on Housing and Homelessness, specifically the article on secondary suites.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session - n/a

Confirmatory By-law

a)

By-law 2016-40 Resolution No. 2016-21-20 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT By-law 2016-40, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac be given first and second reading this 21 day of June, 2016 Carried Resolution No. 2016-21-21 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT By-law 2016-40, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading signed and sealed this 21 day of June 2016. Carried

Adjournment

a)

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-21-22 Moved by Councillor Roberts Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT the Council meeting of June 21, 2016 be adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Carried

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Page Page 90 of 7 189 of 7

Staff Report: Township of South Frontenac

Planning Department

Prepared for Council Agenda Date: July 5, 2016 Date of Report June 27, 2016 Subject: Request For the Township to Permit a Special Event Concert on Property at Part Lot 13, Concession VII, Storrington District: Veseau

Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council approve a request to authorize an exemption to By-law No. 2015-41 (the Noise By-law) to permit a significant event (an outdoor guitar festival) to take place from July 22 to July 24, 2016 on the above-noted property.

Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring back to the Committee a request to hold a special event open-air concert on the above noted property. The property is approximately 41 acres in size and fronts on Loughborough Lake and Sydenham Road. The report includes a location map.

Background The owner of the above-noted property has requested to know whether he would be permitted to hold a ‘significant event’ open-air concert on the land. The event is called “The Canadian Guitar Festival” and it is to be held from July 22 to July 24, 2016. The property is approximately 41 acres in size and fronts on Loughborough Lake and Sydenham Road. Harper Bay Lane runs through the length of the property to provide access to a number of abutting waterfront lots. The lot is shown highlighted on Attachment #1. It should be noted that this would be the twelfth year that the festival has occurred and each event was successful and was generally well received by the public. As on previous occasions, the event would take place in a large canvass structure on the property and he will make use of temporary bathroom facilities during the event. The portion of the property furthest away from the lake, which is the venue, is flat and open and is able to facilitate any required parking. Although there are a number of waterfront residential lots in the vicinity of the subject lot, they are screened visually to some degree by mature stands of deciduous trees and vegetation which would also be expected to mitigate noise from the concert.

Analysis By-law No. 2015-41 is the Township of South Frontenac’s by-law to prohibit and regulate noise. The by-law states that no person shall emit, cause or permit the emission of noise resulting from an act. Included in the list of potential noise producing uses is “the operation of any electronic device or group of devices incorporating one or more loudspeakers, or other electro-mechanical transducers, and

Page 91 of 189

intended for the production or amplification of sound in such a manner as to disturb the peace and comfort of a person at the point of reception.” The by-law lists exemptions to the prohibition, including community public events authorized by the municipality and types of performances in public parks or buildings authorized by the municipality. The list does not automatically exempt such performances on private land and thus, an exemption from the by-law is sought by the property-owner. Also, Schedule 1 of the by-law lists prohibitions by time and place. It limits yelling, shouting, hooting, whistling or singing between the hours of 23:00 of one day and 07:00 of the next day. Again, an exemption is requested from this provision of the by-law. The present use of the waterfront area is for recreational resort camping which, itself, is already associated with a degree of noise and open-air human activity – especially on weekends. The proposed events seem similar in nature to the present use of the land. Council’s authorization is required. As Committee members are aware, the owner held a concert on the property last year which was entitled “Ambush”. The owner had requested relief from the noise by-law for this concert but Council denied the request. However, the event went ahead on September 4, 2015 and, accordingly the owner was charged with an offence under the Noise By-law. The matter is now before the courts and is scheduled for a pre-trial on October 20, 2016. This request was brought to the Committee of the Whole on June 28, 2016 where to Committee gave approval in principle to the request.

Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the request to authorize an exemption under sections 3 and 4 of By-law No. 2015-41(the Noise By-law) to permit an outdoor festival concert event to take place on July 22 to July 24, 2016, on property described as Part of Lot 13, Concession VII, Storrington District, municipally known as 3060 Sydenham Road. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

attachments VezeauReport9

Page 92 of 189

/j

/

‘?% ATTACHMENT #1

j j J

:E.

]

Z.

J-.-

/

< -%-1

/(

aIII

i

n r

J LL

J 1

%

I

l

11%

Th @+

a

r7’

q l

F

F

l

l

l

I l

l

I l

! I

l

uu Z

.,Q-o/

l

l

I

<

l

0:

Ji

I

Lu CL

l

O:

i

a I, 0,

I

I I / / y

/

l }

l

I

/

l

l

l

l

i,ll

l

I l

I

r

l

!

l Ll

l l

I

l

I

• li

‘%

l

/

.y,? .

J /

I

l

l I

]

] i

i l l I

l

l l

)

?

I

II

l

l

r

I

l

1

l

I

I

i

I

i i

CO

i l l

l

l

i

r.

l

r

I

l

l

CI Ce:

l

z

l

0 X o

I

r

/ r

l

l

li

l

I

I

l 7

N rdUffi ‘?i

‘,%%

}:

16

,-41

.1.41

IOl

’t,l

r

l? ,‘1-j

%

‘oS i'3) /-1

(a?‘7

Page 93 of 189

STAFF REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: July 5, 2016 Date of Report: June 29, 2016

Planning Department

Subject: Review of Application for Site Plan Agreement in Part of Lot 2, Concession IV, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac: Silver

Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass a by-law to enter into a site plan agreement for a proposed development of a medical clinic on Rutledge Road.

Purpose of the Report: The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a proposal to develop a commercial medical clinic on Rutledge Road and to advise of the owners’ request to enter into a site plan agreement with the Township. The report includes a location attachment, cross section rendering and a site plan by-law.

Background Approximately four years ago the owners of property at 3085 Rutledge Road rezoned a portion of their property to a Special Rural Commercial (RC-12). Attachment #1 shows the location of the subject land and the area to be developed. The special RC-12 zone permits the following uses:

a business and/or professional office, accessory uses and buildings to the above uses.

The purpose of the rezoning was to accommodate office-type uses on the property and, specifically, a medical clinic and now a site plan application has been submitted to move forward with development of the property.

Discussion Attachment #2 is a copy of a site plan showing the proposed building, parking, access aisles and entrance features. As shown as a shaded area, the entrance and parking areas are all to be a paved asphalt surface. The building itself would be a single storey structure 3,444 square feet in size and would contain office units and exam rooms. Attachment #3 is a cross-section rendering of the proposed building. A stormwater management report was included with the site plan application submission. The report prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc., recommends that drainage from the development be directed southerly to the Millhaven Creek through side yard swales and a new stormwater management facility (SWMF). Major and minor flow paths would be directed to the SWMF and side yard swales and concentrated outlet locations would be enhanced with rip-pap and geotextile. Attachment #2 indicates the stormwater management facility. The matter was brought to the Committee of the Whole on June 28, 2016 for the Committee’s preliminary review. The Committee was favourable to the proposed development and site.

Page 94 of 189

Agency Comments The Planning Department is satisfied that the Plan meets all requirements of the zoning by-law in terms of use, setbacks, parking access aisle widths and landscaping. The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority has no objection to the proposal. Public Works has reached an agreement with the owner for contributions to any required upgrades to Rutledge Road to accommodate ingress and egress at the site.

Recommendation It is recommended that By-law No. 2016-43 attached hereto to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to enter into a site plan agreement with the owners of land described as Part Lot 2, Concession IV, District of Loughborough, be passed. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills

Prepared by: Lindsay Mills

attachments SilverSitePlanReport2

Page 95 of 189

u

J

<-

ll {

l

i

J

I

iL?LLllJ lp i 11

II

ATTACHMENT #1 l

l

l

l

l

l

l l

i

l

l

t l

l

i l

l l

l l

/

,?y-,;.,:i:. . . h: : , , .:. /

/

! l l

/

/

/ /

/

‘? I ]

/ l

l

ri

if

RlaEDGE ROAD

-,P

l

AREA TO BE DEVELOPED

,,-11111

S,)1

il,-.ll?l

i /

i

l

i

l

!

%r

I

l

H

l

l

l I

!-

l

kl

jq.l . };

l

y?’%

Av’/

.-.1

.l:l

iThi.

‘%i ?’?

I

i

J

!

I

I

f?

-4,

i

“";o?

l

l

I

l

i

l i l

i

i t

I

-.1

Page 96 of 189 I i

i

r

%

l

m, ??

p* !

l

M

ATTACHMENT #2

" 0

l 1 ?l

ili

i

l

11

i

l

-@ l

i

t

i

l

l

I J .0L

s

/

x

i %-?.

%?

€ l

l

l

r6 A

i %

?l

l

I

J t +

k

f

W

%

o S

Page 97 of 189

ATTACHMENT #3 111

< z

0

O J

:I

,X()

50 ‘wd}

(N()

l €-

<[ l

<

J

ti?i

z

):

o

lu! 1111

Qi-

mn

d))

Z,

h

li,,3

O

[l.[)!

l l

(zp

lllu )[11

Uj <o o o

0

+-o

l(..

,’

0 0C O

Lu z

if.

ui

0

l i l l l l

r

L

z l

l

l’ il

111,,l

1’

F”?lt’yz’

?ii;

-=lllr’a[l4

l j l

0

I

J l l l

(

?:

X

lu

s 2

Q

IX (K s ‘13

-11 l I l i l iN'4)(’

,/’ l

h

o

lLo J ui

l,’

0

l’

-P (N

l’

}

‘(

/

l

?;

7

,.’.; tH z

‘S,. } li

’e “;

? =h’;

11115 I! l j l j l

lr]idlW ?!!Iit

r!l ll[J!

z

o h

<[

Lu

11

Z-,t-

‘di

J

LLI

ll’l

1 h

L

0!: o

I.

jll

I’ il 11

,l,

l’ <(l

14

311

z

il

if.

• • • –11 Lj

Page 98 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 25, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Young – Leland Rd RECOMMENDATION: That Council direct staff to proceed with road closing process and confirm that the Young’s will only be responsible for their share of the legal costs. BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-Law 2015-56 establishes the process for Notice of Motion. At the Council Meeting of June 21, following debate about the passage of the minutes of the June 14 COW meeting, Deputy Mayor Sutherland, served Notice of Motion to clarify that the Young’s in addressing an outstanding transfer of an unopened road allowance are only responsible for their legal fees. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and then voted upon.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 99 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 29, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Hartington Sub Division RECOMMENDATION: That Council ask the County to defer any decision on the Hartington Subdivision until such time that the final peer review by Malroz is released publicly and South Frontenac Council has had an opportunity to consider this information. BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-Law 2015-56 establishes the process for Notice of Motion. At the Council Meeting of June 28, following closed session with the Township’s solicitor on the pending Hartington OMB appeal, Councillor Schjerning, served Notice of Motion to ask the County to defer their decision until the Malroz report is released and Council has had an opportunity to consider it. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and then voted upon.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 100 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 21, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Ontario East Regional Agility Competition Noise and Camping Exemptions RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council authorize the Recreation Supervisor and CAO to enter into an agreement with the Ontario East Regional Agility Competition organizers; AND that Council exempt the Ontario East Regional Agility Competition taking place on June 3/4th, 2017 at Centennial Park from the Township’s noise bylaw as requested; AND FURTHER that Council provide a one-time exemption to permit camping in Centennial Park for the sole purpose of use for the competitor’s trailers during the Ontario East Regional Agility Competition as requested. BACKGROUND: The Ontario East Regional Agility Competition has been hosted on private property Harrowsmith annually since 2012. The organizers are looking for a new location and have approached the Township for the use of Centennial Park. The park is being requested from Friday June 2-4th, 2017 Attached is a letter from the organizers outlining important information on event logistics; attendance figures, camping details, waste management, references, etc. The organizers are aware that fires and dumping of grey water are prohibited and that camping will only take place in the identified area located in the North West parking area. Recreation and Public Works staff have met on site with the organizers to discuss the logistics of the event and are satisfied in what is being proposed. ATTACHMNETS: Letter from event organizer

Submitted/approved by: Tim Laprade, Arena & Recreation Supervisor

Page 101 of 189

HI Tim, Thanks for taking the time to meet me on site and bringing this to council for me. For the councils consideration for hosting the Ontario East Regional Championships in 2017 at Centennial Park in Harrowsmith. This is an annual event hosted by different clubs throughout Region. I have been hosting agility trials and seminars in Harrowsmith for over 10 years. I have been hosting the Ontario EAST Regional championships every year since 2012 without incident. The Ontario EAST Region includes Eastern, Southern and Northern Ontario. Typically this event has had 150 - 225 dogs in attendance. This is an annual event that can be hosted anywhere within the region but I would be very happy to keep applying to host in Harrowsmith. We have been hosting the event at the Day Farm on Harrowsmith Road, but with them no longer hosting the Grass Drags at the site and the ‘track area’ no longer being rolled smooth every year, the footing has become rougher every year and is no longer acceptable. I have lived in Harrowsmith since 1998 and would love to continuing bring this event to my town that I am so very proud of. The increased traffic will benefit local business as well bring more attention to our fabulous community. The event would be a free event for any spectators who wished to attend and it can be publicized any way the township would like, The median age for competitors is late 50’s, so you are dealing with a more mature group than most sporting events. So the ‘party’ aspect of the event is really non existent. For campers staying on site we have never allowed camp fires and at dusk everyone is already settled into their beds for the night. Competitors at this event must achieve 350 points for the event to qualify for the Nationals event. Since this is the case it easy a very early night for competitors that have been outside competing all day and they will want to ensure that they and their dogs are well rested for the next day of competing. We have typically only had about 15 – 25 overnight campers at the event. We have port a potties brought in with daily clean out during the event, a small potable water tanker brought in for use of the competitors, Duffer’s food truck has been our only food vendor for the past 4 years and will have the permits required for serving food in the township, and power supply needed is minimal. We do have a generator to use if needed but it would be housed to keep noise to a minimum. We have also used Eliminator Power Packs if needed as well. Trailers Page 102 of 189

coming in will be dumping their gray water at either the Joyceville Truck Stop or the Flying J in Napanee as they have done in previous years. Competitors on site that are witnessed to not having picked up after their dog are asked to leave the site without refund and therefore are unable to compete at the National event. We have full clean up stations for accidents that dogs may have on any playing surface immediately so that orders do not linger and grassed areas are not damaged. Agility ran for many years at the Quarry Soccer dome in Kingston on the indoor turfed fields without incident. Krista Swackhammer was the owner of the property and is available if you have any concerns regarding dogs on the fields. Her contact info is Krista.swackhammer@kingston.net and cell is 613-261-6402. In 2013 I also used the Memorial center grounds in Kingston if you wanted to contact them to see if they had any concerns. We are prepared to have site repair items on hand if required for the fields as events run rain or shine. This is something we are willing to work with the township with however they would like to move forward with the possible need of site repair in the event of heavy rain. Personally I am on the Board of Directors with the Agility Association of Canada, a Masters level agility judge and a competitor. It is my expectation that competitors will start coming to the site by 7am Saturday and Sunday Mornings preparing for first dog to start competing by 8:15am. On the Friday dogs and owners will be coming in throughout the day starting at 8am. Competitors not staying on site usually are packed up and leave the site by 5pm each day. If you have any questions, comments or concerns please contact me. Jennifer Laird jennifer.lairdaarf@gmail.com 613 484 2273

Page 103 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 27, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Permission to serve alcohol at the Stantive Technologies Staff BBQ RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council authorize the Recreation Supervisor and CAO to enter into an agreement with Stantive Technologies Staff BBQ organizers; AND that Council give permission for the serving of alcohol as per Section 10 item (c) ‘Alcoholic Beverages’ of BY-LAW 2002 -57 for the Stantive Technologies Staff BBQ taking place on from Noon- 7 p.m. on August 26th, 2016 at Centennial Park. BACKGROUND: Through a South Frontenac resident and staff of Stantive Technologies, a request has been made for the use of the Centennial Park Pavilion and adjacent Park area to hold their annual Staff Appreciation BBQ. The park is being requested on Friday August 26th from noon-7 p.m. 2016. The private event attendance is expected to be approximately 80 and the organizers are planning to hire Western Cut Productions to provide Catering of food and beverages. The organizers are aware that along with the items listed below as per the Township’s Booking Form and User Agreement that permission for the ‘sale and serving of alcoholic beverages’ must be granted as per Section 10 item (c) ‘Alcoholic Beverages’ of BY-LAW 2002 -57 ‘District Recreation Committees may recommend to Council the sale and serving of alcoholic beverages for certain events sponsored by private individuals who are Township residents, District teams, associations, or non-profit organizations where a public benefit is deemed to result.’ Due to the timing of this event and the need for the organizers to confirm and book a caterer, Staff are requesting Councils approval as per the recommendation above and will also inform the Portland Recreation Committee of the event. User Agreement Terms and Condition • Organizer to complete and sign copy of the Booking Form and User Agreement • Organizer to obtain a L.C.B.O. Special Occasion Permit. • Organizer to provide confirmation that the user has obtained a “Special Event” certificate from the K.F.L.A. Health Unit is required. • Organizer to provide Third party liability and property damage insurance policy coverage shall be required showing the Township of South Frontenac as third party thereto. • Organizer to provide payment for use of space including a $150 Clean-up deposit ATTACHMNETS: • Booking Form and User Agreement Submitted/approved by: Tim Laprade, Arena & Recreation Supervisor

Page 104 of 189

3FDFJQU


Township of South Frontenac Outdoor Recreation Facility Booking Request and User Agreement

Booking Details Name of Activity or Event Name of Organization or Individual Contact Information Address Phone number

Email

Dates & Times Requested

Additional setup/amenities required

Location of activity and type of amenity Centennial Park Upper Ball Diamond Lower Ball Diamond Upper Soccer Field Lower Soccer Field Pavilion Park Court Gilmour Point Pavilion

(Select all that are required)

Memorial Park (The Point) Large Ball Diamond Small Ball Diamond Soccer/Football Field Pavilion Park

Dave Bowes Memorial/Keeley West Ball Diamond East Ball Diamond Soccer Field

Wilmer Ball Diamond

Gerald Ball Memorial Park Soccer field Court Battersea Ball Diamond

Glendower Park Small Ball Diamond Park Inverary Ball Diamond

Latimer Park (Heska)

Davidson Beach

Harris Park

McMullen/Verona Park Large Soccer Field Small Soccer Field Court

Princess Anne Park (Hartington) Soccer Field

Frontenac Arena Upper Soccer Field Lower Soccer Field

Booking Fees

Resident

Non-Resident

Minor Sport Groups Seasonal Participant User Fee (onetime fee) $8/per participant $8/per participant Tournament Fees Per Diamond/Field Per Day (7am-5pm) 75.00 90.00 Per Night (5pm-11pm) 75.00 90.00 Adult Sport Groups or Events Seasonal Fee (maximum 12 day/nights) 200.00 300.00 Additional per over maximum 15.00 30.00 Per Use (Diamond and/or Soccer Field and/or Park) Per Day (7am-5pm) 50.00 75.00 Per Night (5pm-11pm) 50.00 75.00 Additional Fees Exclusive Use of Gazebo 50.00 75.00 Lights Per Diamond 20.00 25.00 Key Deposit 50.00 75.00 Clean-up Deposits (tournaments and/or events) 150.00 150.00 HST (13%) I/We have read and fully understand the terms and conditions listed below and will abide by the said terms and conditions. If there is any contravention of these conditions, this booking shall become null and void. Applicant Name

Applicant Signature

Date

Page 105 of 189

Terms and Conditions

1. Cheques must be made payable to the “Township of South Frontenac”.
2. Fees are payable two weeks in advance of the date of the event and bookings are not considered complete until payment is received in full. Key and Clean-up deposits will be deposited by the Treasury Office and refunded following the event upon satisfaction of the terms on the reverse.
3. Only non-corrosive substances (talc) are approved for lining out facilities.
4. The facility is to be used only on the dates and hours indicated and use shall not exceed 11:00 p.m. except Sunday when it will not exceed 9:00 p.m.
5. All areas, building, equipment and other property of the Township shall be left in clean and undamaged conditions in its proper storage place.
6. Fires are not permitted unless, written permission is granted by the South Frontenac Fire Department and the Recreation Coordinator.
7. Games of chance are not permitted without a permit issued by the Municipal Office.
8. No person shall sell, advertise, announce, or display goods or merchandise or carry on any commercial activity, unless the Township of South Frontenac grants approval.
9. Consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited, unless under the authority of the L.C.B.O. Special Occasion Permit.
10. If the Recreation Committee leases the canteen, the concessionaire shall have the sole right to sell food, materials and the like, in the Park area.
11. ‘If’ food is being sold/served to the Public, confirmation that the user has obtained a “Special Event” certificate from the K.F.L.A. Health Unit is required.
12. The user will indemnify and save harmless the Township of South Frontenac itself, and all of its officers and agents from and against all claims, demands, losses, costs, damages, actions, suits or other proceeding, by whomever made, sustained, brought or prosecuted in any many based upon, occasioned by, or attributable to any injury or damage arising or resulting from any act or omissions of our organization, its servants in using the said premises.
13. Third party liability and property damage insurance policy coverage shall be required showing the Township of South Frontenac as third party thereto.
14. All fees and deposits will be paid to the Municipal Office. All fees are non-refundable unless the approved by the Arena & Recreation Supervisor.
15. Cancellation may occur after persistent inclement weather, which would result in damage to playing surfaces.
16. Parking is allowed in designated areas only.
17. Sport Groups shall supply their own talc and spreader.

Bases and nets will not be

supplied for tournaments by the municipality. 18. It is the responsibility of the user to promptly advise the Municipal Office of any lighting problems. 19. Any contravention of these terms will nullify this booking immediately.

Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100, Sydenham, Ontario, K0H 2T0 Tel: 613-376-3027, Fax: 613-376-6657 www.southfrontenac.net

Page 106 of 189

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 29, 2016

AGENDA DATE: July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Purchase of Automated Vehicle Locating software (AVL) from Tyroute Communications (Telus) RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the purchase of AVL from Tyroute Communications for 47 vehicles initially. AND THAT the 2016 cost of $40.00 per unit per month, exclusive of HST be funded from the approved capital budget. BACKGROUND: AVL Systems is one of the newest tools utilized by many Municipalities and other government agencies for locating and monitoring of fleet. The data gathered from the AVL system provides assistance for customer complaints in terms of vehicle operation speed, garbage pick-up, adherence to minimum maintenance standards for winter and non-winter operations, and vehicle maintenance programs. It is because of this that an amount of $100,000 has been introduced in the 2016 Capital budget for Public Works and Building Department fleet. Following meetings with the County of Lennox and Addington and associated lower tier Municipalities, staff were prepared to go with Champion Industrial Equipment for their AVL Solution. However, in conversations with staff from Central Frontenac another solution, Fleet Complete by Tyroute Telus, was brought to our attention. Central Frontenac Township elected to go with Tyroute Communications and their Fleet Complete solution as this solution provided the same functionality without the cost for hardware and installation. Lennox and Addington advertised an RFP for AVL System and received responses from two vendors. We have taken the opportunity to review Fleet complete against Skyhawk, the selected vendor Lennox and Addington contracted. It is the belief of staff that Fleet complete will provide the core functionality without the cost to purchase, install, and maintain the hardware. These savings amount to approximately $97,000 as quoted from Skyhawk for our AVL system above the monthly service fee of $40.00 per month per unit that is common with both solutions. Also, both solutions require the Municipality to sign for a 3 Year term. While there is no residual value of the Skyhawk Hardware after purchasing it and only a 1 year warranty on parts, the Fleet Complete is similar to a cellular phone contract where you do not pay for the hardware and the warranty is good for the length of the term. Renewal of the term allows for updated hardware to be installed, which again is good for the length of the term. In addition Fleet Complete is currently capable of providing information on whether the plow is up or down, and vehicle Electronic Control Module data in terms of required maintenance, speed, odometer, fuel usage, etc. as Skyhawk is.

Page 107 of 189

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Fleet Complete has also committed to provide the sander application rates before the winter season of 2017/18. The following vehicles are proposed to have AVL installed: 9 – PW Half Ton trucks 6 – PW Three Quarter Ton trucks 2 – PW 3 Ton Dump trucks 16 – PW Tandem Dump Trucks 1 – PW Tri-Axle Dump Truck 3 – Building Inspection Half Ton trucks 1 – Fire and Rescue Half Ton truck 7 – Arterial Road Plowing Contractor Trucks 1 – Garbage Truck (Internal) 1 – Mechanic Vehicle FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An Amount of $100,000.00 was approved in the 2016 Capital Budget for the purchase of new AVL System for all Public Works and Building Department vehicles. Based on the pricing provided by Tyroute Communications for Fleet Complete, it is anticipated our 2016 Capital cost would be $9,400, exclusive of HST. This cost represents $40.00/month per unit based on an anticipated go live date of August 2, 2016. Future service costs to maintain the system will be funded through the respective department’s annual operating budgets.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared By:

Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

David Holliday, CET Area Supervisor

Page 108 of 189

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

June 28, 2016

Agenda Date:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: 2017 Budget Cycle RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the 2017 budget cycle as presented. BACKGROUND: Building on the success of the 2012 to 2016 budget process and based on the direction from the Corporate Services Committee, the following schedule is proposed for the 2017 budget. Of note are revisions to a few steps. Previously, the budget document was tabled the Tuesday prior to the Saturday full day operating budget review. For 2017, the budget document is scheduled to be tabled on November 1st, which provides an additional week for Council’s review as well as allowing time for comments from public on the draft budget. In 2016 public delegations were invited on budget direction; this year input is being sought on the draft budget itself. For 2017, advertising will be placed in the banner ad 4weeks in advance inviting the public to appear as delegates at the November 8, Committee of the Whole meeting. Meeting Date Jul 5 Sept 20 Oct 11 Oct 25 Nov 1 Nov 8 Nov 12 Nov 22 Dec 6 Dec 13 Dec 20

Activity Budget Schedule Council set budget Direction / Long Term Financial Plan Update Non PW Capital Presentation PW Capital Presentation Table Budget Document Delegations on Budget Document Operating Budget (SATURDAY) Budget revisions Budget Approval? Budget Debate – if needed Budget Approval – if needed

Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Page 109 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 25, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Verona Medical Lease

RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council authorize the CAO to enter into a new lease with the Verona Medical Clinic as operated by Dr. S. Gibbens.

BACKGROUND: Council approved By-law 2010-80 to authorize the purchase of the Verona Medical Clinic in October 2010. The transaction closed on October 31, 2011. The intent of the purchase was to create a turnkey operation that would support physician recruitment without impacting the operating costs of the Township. Dr. Dempsey will maintain the lease until October 31, 2106, despite her retirement effective June 30, 2016. The Verona and District Health Services Committee, a committee of Council, passed the following resolution on March 21 “That the Verona and District Health Services Committee confirms the success of the present agreement in attracting and retaining doctors for the Verona Clinic and recommends that the Township of South Frontenac negotiate a new lease with the doctors to come into effect when the present lease expires on Oct. 31, 2016.” The lease is operated on a cost recovery basis and includes an allowance to be put aside for capital projects. It has no net cost to the tax supported budget. Staff recommend establishing a new lease on the same basis, with the Verona Medical Clinic as operated by Dr. S. Gibbens. The term would be for one year with the right to renew on a yearly basis for four more years. Each year there would be a reconciliation of the operating costs. Submitted by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 110 of 189

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 29, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Seniors Housing RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council supports moving forward with the development of a business case for a market rent seniors housing project on municipal water in Sydenham; AND THAT that Council requests the County to fund the development of this business case from the funds ear marked for a senior’s project; AND THAT the business case explore and reference current funding incentives and address any unique requirements for a Public Private Partnership model AND THAT upon completion of the business case a Request for Expressions of Interest be issued to publicly solicit interested parties. BACKGROUND: The South Frontenac Seniors Housing Task Force has met several times and heard from the consultants hired by the County on the development of the business case for the Marysville project as well as representatives from the City of Kingston who manage social housing in the Frontenacs. Based on local experience the Committee understands that the need is not for affordable housing (as illustrated by the lack of a significant waiting list at Loughborough housing) but rather to address the demands for market driven accommodation. Following up on the direction of the committee, the CAO has been briefed on the interest of two different stakeholders. The following is a resolution passed by the committee on June 29. Whereas the Seniors Housing Task Force requested that the Chief Administrative Officer of the Township of South Frontenac explore options with the Southern Frontenac Community Services, and private developers to determine if there is an interest in pursuing the development of a Business Plan for Seniors Housing in South Frontenac. And Whereas the Chief Administrative Officer of the Township of South Frontenac has advised that there is an interest from both parties in looking at some form of a community partnership to develop seniors housing in South Frontenac: Be It Resolved That the Seniors Housing Task Force request that the Chief Administrative Officer of the Township of South Frontenac update the Council of the Township of South Frontenac on the progress of this committee and provide direction on the type of Seniors Housing needed in South Frontenac Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 111 of 189

Loughborough District Parks and Recreation Canada Day Sub-Committee June 9, 2016 – 7 p.m. Attendance: Chair Mike Howe, Nick Adam, Carol Sparling, Gary Hay, Janet Knights, Helen Parfitt, Sandra Sigsworth, Joanne Barr, Darlene LaBarre Regrets: John Trousdale, Pam Deline, Bill Arthur, Kerry Arthur, Evelyn Batson Report from the Committee Fireworks Report

• No additional news to report at this time. Flyers/Advertisements/Website
• The posters have now been updated by SHS students. They will receive a stipend for their time and effort.
• More pictures are needed for the website. Please forward any contributions to Joanne Barr.
• Large signs will be posted in the community this week. Volunteers
• The SHS students have submitted their list for t-shirt sizes. A list for the adults is still required.
• Joanne Barr is holding a short workshop to help teach SHS volunteers how to face paint. She emailed Evelyn Batson to set up a date. Nick Adam will follow up with Evelyn to set up a time. Face painters will need to be at The Point to set up by 11 a.m. The shifts will be 11-1 and 3-5 with a break in between.
• Volunteers for the children’s games are to be at The Point by 12 or 12:30 at the latest. Fundraising/Finances
• $3,000 has been raised in the community so far. Parade
• The parade is fully organized. The signage will be posted this week advising the public about the road closures. Activities
• Carol Sparling will speak with the person that set up the cow patty bingo last year. Norm Irwin has a baseball liner that can be borrowed. 5 ft X 4 snow fencing and stakes are needed to set up the area. Food

Music

The Sydenham Legion Ladies Auxiliary will hold a bake sale at Canada Day. Chair Mike Howe will speak with Dan Bell to inquire as to whether they charge their vendor to sell items at their Canada Day event. Joanne Barr will provide Chair Mike Howe with the names and phone numbers of last year’s vendors so that he can contact them about returning this year.

Nick Adam will contact LPS to ask if there is any interest in performing at the event. SHS has 3 performers confirmed. Ava Ludlow is interested in singing the national anthem this year. The Canoe Club will lend the committee a large chalkboard to list the musical acts so that the public will know who is playing and when.

Miscellaneous Chair Mike Howe is to contact Mark Segsworth one week prior to Canada Day to confirm the amount of barrier needed (approximately 10). Next Meeting: Thursday, June 23, 2016 @ 7 p.m. Adjournment: 8:00 p.m. Recording Secretary: Sarah Vandewal

Page 112 of 189

SOUTH FRONTENAC PORTLAND REC COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes –May 30th, 2016

Attendees: Dan Bell, Pam Morey, Cheryl Preston, Brenda Adams, Mary Jo Dowker, Pickle ball delegation: Don Crone, David Bussier and Chuck MacDonald Regrets: Christine Leblanc

1. The minutes of March’s meeting were reviewed. Motion to accept by Mary Jo Dowker and seconded by Brenda Adams.
2. The Agenda for May 30th, 2016 meeting was reviewed. Motion to accept by Cheryl Preston and seconded by Brenda Adams.
3. There was discussion on the business arising from the minutes: Business Arising from Minutes: • • • •

A Central recreation update was given and the recreation survey was mentioned. Call for Canada Day a volunteer was mentioned by Pam Morey. Courts at Centennial Park have been repaired and sprayed. The Ice Stock group and Pickle ball group will make arrangements to put lines for their sports on the multi sports pad. Discussion on Skate board Park will have to wait until Council’s decision regarding the recommendation made by Central Recreation is to have a feasibility study is decided.

New Business: •

•

A delegation from the Pickle ball group that play at the multi sports pad at Centennial Park in Harrowsmith was in attendance. They informed us of their growing sport that is encouraged and adaptable for people of all ages. They presently play at the Centennial Park location 5 times a week. The sports pad surface has been sprayed and all cracks sealed. This Pickle ball group has painted on lines for several courts. Moving forward the Pickle ball group would like to see the Centennial park multi sports pad become a permanent pad dedicated pickle ball. They have made a suggestion that the Portland Recreation Committee make a recommendation to the Central Recreation Committee to make a recommendation to Council that they consider that the multi sports pad become a dedicated pickle ball pad with permanent nets and courts for this sport. In order for this multi sports pad to become dedicated to pickle ball the surface would have to be redone and new permanent nets installed at a cost estimated by their group of $15,000.00. Creating a totally new pickle ball facility was also discussed. It was mentioned that a new facility was recently built in Bath at a cost of $90,000.00. One of our Portland Recreation members, Brenda Adams, mentioned that she will be moving and no longer be able to be a member of our committee.

Meeting was adjourned at 8:13. Our next will be held at the Princess Anne building in Hartington at 7:00, Monday, June 27th, 2016.

Page 113 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-41

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LANDS FROM LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL-WATERFRONT

ZONE (RLSW) TO SPECIAL LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIALWATERFRONT ZONE (RLSW-112 AND SPECIAL LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIAL-WATERFRONT ZONE (RLSW-113); PART LOT 11, CONCESSION 1, D?STRICT OF STORRINGTON: TRIPP WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it

expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to a parcel of land located in Part of Lot 11, Concession I, in the District of Storrington, NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. THAT Schedule ‘C’ to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is

hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW) to Special Limited Service ResidentialWaterfront (RLSW-112) and Special Limited Service ResidentialWaterfront Zone (RLSW-113) for those lands shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “1”. 2.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RLSW-112 (Part Lot 11 , Concession 1, Storrington District) immediately after section RLSW-111 (Part Lot 6, Concession V, Bedford District-Campbell), to read as follows:

RLSW-112 (Part Lot 11, Concession ?, Storrington District !ri? Notwithstanding the provisions of section 10.3.1 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW-112), the following provisions shall apply:

• Lot Area (Minimum)………………………..8,000 metres2 (2 ac.) All other provisions of this by-law shall apply.

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RLSW-113 (Part Lot 11 , Concession 1, Storrington District) immediately after section RLSW-112 (Part Lot 11, Concession 1, Storrington District-Tripp), to read as follows: RLSW-113 (Part Lot 11, Concession ?, Storrington District ?

-Notwithstanding the provisions of section 10.3.1 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, on the Iands zoned Special Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW-113), the following provisions shall apply:

Lot Area (Minimum)…………………………. 4,000 metres?’ (I ac.) Setback from highwater mark or floodline of a body of water

for any new structure (Minimum)………………36 metres (118 ff.) Gross floor area for any

new principal building (Maximum)…………. 74 metres (800 ft. ) Footprint for any

new principal building (Maximum)…………. 79 metres (850 ft. ) No living space shall be added below grade All other provisions of this by-law shall apply.

Page 114 of 189

4. THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the

Planning Act, 1990, either on the date of passage or as otherwise provided by section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifth day of July, 2016. Read a first and second time this fifth day of July, 2016.

Read a third time and finally passed this fifth day of July, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 115 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

(STORRINGTON DISTR?CT) n?

SCHEDULE ‘1’ BY-LAW No. 2016-41

40? ’ o ? a ‘?r ofl l"nl

(9’e’

IW/

[J S AREA REZONED FROM ‘RLSW’ TO ‘RLSW-113’ AREA REZONED FROM ‘RLSW’ TO ‘RLSW-112’

7

/

N

€)

W?

E

?%l

g <X /'>

s

f’l

Loughborough Lake

,,? v

J

A

/

00 000 00’

/

000

l

‘(

C O O O 07 0 0 0 0 Q C O%O O C) O C)

}

l

O O C) C C) O O

i

COOOOO

l

l l

0000

v

l

l

l

o

l

‘111

l’

l

l

S

/

/

J?

,‘g’/ 7

/

/

f !

/

I uJ

E Cl

I

Cl o o

l l I

r

k

l

M*!ets 60

90

x l

120

J

I

€Q

THIS SCHEDULE “1” TO BY-LAW No. 2016-41

PASSED THIS 5?’ DAY OF JUNE 2016 MAYOR CLERK Page 116 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-42

BEING A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE LANDS FROM LIM?TED SERVICE RESIDENT?AL-WATERFRONT

ZONE (RLSW) TO SPECIAL LIMITED SERVICE RESIDENTIALWATERFRONT ZONE (RLSW-114); PART LOT 20, CONCESSION IX, DISTRICT OF STORRINGTON: STRICELJ

WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to a parcel of land located in Part of Lot 11, Concession I, in the District of Storrington, NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. THAT Schedule ‘C’ to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning from Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW) to Special Limited Service ResidentialWaterfront (RLSW-114) for those lands shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “1”.
2. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by adding a new section RLSW-114 (Part Lot 20, Concession IX, Storrington District) immediately affer section RLSW-113 (Part Lot 11 , Concession 1, Storrington District-Tripp), to read as follows: RLSW-114 (Part Lot 20, Concession IX, Storrington District !rj? Notwithstanding the provisions of section 10.3.1 or any other provision of this By-law to the contrary, on the lands zoned Special Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW-114), the following provisions shall apply: Setback from highwater mark or floodline of a body of water for any new structure (Minimum)………………6 metres (20 ff.) Setback from top-of-bank (Minimum)……. 1 metre (3 ff.)

All other provisions of this by-law shall apply. 3. THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the

Planning Act, 1990, either on the date of passage or as otherwise provided by section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifth day of July, 2016. Read a first and second time this fifth day of July, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this fifth day of July, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 117 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

7’

SCHEDULE ‘1’ BY-LAW No. 2016-42

:!

JAREA REZONED FROM ‘RLSW’ TO ‘RLSW-114’ N

43

W’

E

s

o o 1%

o i0 1# sl’ r 7

Dog Lake

‘r ,’

‘-,,

l

}

S

S

s€s<=

S

‘-,

/

/

/'>

)]

l

/

? l

/l

/’

/ /

/

/

?Sl

/

/

/

/

]

/

i k}

/

S

l

/

/ /

/

l /

Dog Lake l

S

/

/

/

I

(,/

/

0 20 40

80

120

Mekets 160

1

THIS SCHEDULE “1” TO BY-LAW No. 2016-42

PASSED THIS sTH DAY OF atmlzots MAYOR CLERK

Page 118 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-43

BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CLERK TO EXECUTE A SITE PLAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC AND DARRYL SILVER AND SHIRLEY SILVER.

WHEREAS a Site Plan Agreement has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Township of South Frontenac and the proponent; AND WHEREAS the Owners have signed the site plan agreement; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCI, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. THAT the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a Site Plan Agreement between the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac and Darryl Silver and Shirley Silver, a copy of which is attached hereto forming part of this by-law.

2. THAT this By-law and Agreement shall be registered on title of the properties described as Part Lot 2, Concession IV, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac.

3. THIS BY-LAW shall come into force and effect in accordance with section 41 of

the Planning Act 1990, either upon the date of passage or as otherwise provided by the said section 41.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifth day of July, 2016. Read a first and second time this fifth day of July, 2016.

Read a third time and finally passed this fifth day of July, 2016.

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 119 of 189

THIS SITE PLAN AGREEMENT made this day of , 2016. BETWEEN: DARRYL SILVER AND SHIRLEY SILVER

hereinafter called the “Owner” OF THE FIRST PART

• and -

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

hereinafter called the “Municipality” OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS the Owner is the registered owner in fee simple of certain lands described in Schedule ?A”, attached hereto, located in the Township of South Frontenac (the “Owners’ Land”); AND WHEREAS the Municipality is authorized to enter into this agreement and

register it against the title to the Lands pursuant to section 41 of the Planning Act and section 6.17 of the Township of South Frontenac Official Plan; AND WHEREAS the Municipality has passed by-law No. 2003-75 to designate all of

the Township of South Frontenac as a ?Site Plan Control Area”; NOW THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree each with the other as follows:

In this Agreement.’

a) “Owner” includes a mortgagee in possession, a tenant in possession pursuant to a leasehold interest, and encumbancer in possession and may mean more than one Ouiner specified in the Certificate of ownership.

1. TheOwnercovenantsthattheOwneristheOwnerinfeesimpleoftheOwner’s land.

The obligations imposed by this Agreement affect the land described in Schedule “A? hereto and any restrictive covenants expressed herein run with the land and bind successors in title to the said property as well as the successors and assigns of the Owner.

3. The encumbrancer agrees to satisfy all the obligations imposed pursuant to this document if it should enter into possession of the said land.

4. The following schedules are attached to and form part of this agreement and no new building, structure or other facility shall be erected, altered or placed on the said land except in accordance with the attached schedules which consist of:

A.

Legal Description of Lands

B.

Site Plan

C.

Sydenham Medical Centre Storrnwater Management Report

Page 120 of 189

s. The Owner shall perform all the work and provide all the materials necessary for the construction of the new facilities and access ways and any required fencing

andlandscaping as specified on the Site Plan, included as Schedule ?B? to this Agreement. 6.

The Owner shall constmct a 311 metre2 single storey commercial building and a 297 metre?’ paved manoeuvring/access area located as shown on Schedule “B” and as further specified on Schedule “C? and as described on Drawings dated September 15, 2015 prepared by Pelow Engineering. This work shall include areas specified for garbage collection, lighting, loading, landscaping and signage.

The Owner shall carry out the placement of a landscaped area and treed area as identified on Schedule “B? and to include landscaping treatment between the road allowance of Rutledge Road and the paved area.

8. All work on the subject land shall be carried out in accordance with the ?Sydenham Medical Centre Stornnwater Management Report?, dated October 2015, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc.

Site development shall include access and manoeuvring areas as shown and signage is to be attached to the north-facing side of the building. Lighting is to be placed on the building as indicated on ?Schedule B?.

10. TheaccessontoRutledgeRoadistobeconstructedtoTownshipspecifications. The required access and manoeuvring areas shown on Schedule ?B? are to be paved with asphalt. The parking, access aisles and manoeuvring areas shall be paved with asphalt within two (2) years of the date of this agreement.
11. TheOwnershallpreventdarnagebeingcausedtoexistingpublichighways,other

public works or municipal property in the course of development of the lands. 12.

The Owner agrees to contribute to improvements to Rutledge Road to facilitate access to the development to the satisfaction of the Township.

13. Intheeventofasaleoftheimprovedlands,thenewOwnerwillassumefulland

complete responsibility for the continuing obligations under this Agreement. The enforcement of this Agreement is the responsibility of the Municipality. 14.

The Agreement shall be registered against the title of the Lands and the Municipality shall be entitled to enforce its provisions against the Owner and any and all subsequent owners of the Lands.

15. IntheeventthattheOwnerfailstoinstallormaintainthefacilitiescoveredbythis

Agreement, then, upon the Chief Building Official or designate, giving seven days written notice by pre-paid registered mail to the Owners, the municipality, through it’s employees, agents or contractors, may, without further notice, enter upon the lands and proceed to supply all materials and to do all the necessary inspections and works in connection with the facilities including the repair or reconstruction of faulty work and the replacement of materials which are not in accordance with plans or specifications and to charge the cost thereof, together with the cost of engineering and any other expenses incurred by the municipality, against the Owner. Such entry and work shall not be deemed as acceptance or assumption of said facilities nor an assumption by the Municipality of any liability. It is expressly agreed that the Owners or any person in possession shall not question the cost incurred by the Municipality for labour, materials or any other costs incidental to do the said work and this provision shall be deemed to

operate as an effective estoppel in judicial proceedings if such costs are challenged or placed in question. The Owners agree to permit the Chief Building Official, or agent, to enter onto the Lands at any time to inspect the work. The Municipality may perform any of the required services and collect the cost for the enforcement of this Agreement against the said Lands from any security received.

Page 121 of 189

16. The Owner covenants and agrees that the lands and premises more particularly described in Schedule ?A? annexed hereto may only be used for those purposes specified by Zoning Amendment By-law No. 2010-s 8.

WITNESS the corporate seals of the respective corporate parties hereto, duly affixed under the hands of their respective signing officers, duly authorized in that behalf.

SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED ) In the presence of

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Mayor

Clerk

Page 122 of 189

SCHEDULE “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS

Part of Lot 2, Concession IV, Loughborough District, Township of South Frontenac

Page 123 of 189

ATTACHMENT #2

{

l i

l

-@

l

d

i

l

l -l

i

i

i *

% l

y

A

i i

J z-.

;

s

j-

I l *

t

l l

/

l

l

/ i

‘?

I I

l l’w K!

@a t t

l

l

{! v

?f

€:

i6

%a

m

A!

a

l

{

?sw

{

w

l

l

)

l

1

a

l

l

l

i?: ?L?e+ ?

W

i

2 P

o + r

Page 124 of 189

@!“n9,,ffi9Aj:,(: f;l;c SCHEDULE ?C? SYDENHAM MEDICAL CENTRE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc. October, 2015 PELOW ENG?NEERING

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management Report

Prepared by: FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

613.634.9009 tel

1329 Gardiners Road, Suite 210

888.884.9392 fax

Kingston, ON, Canada K7P OL8

Date: October 2015

Page 125 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Engineering Inc.

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Managemem Repork

c P

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report has been prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc. (Consultant) for the benefit of the Client in accordance with their Agreement. The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report:

1. is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report;
2. represents Consultant’s judgement in light of the Iimitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports;

may be based on information provided to Consultant which has not been independently verified;

has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is Iimited to the time and circumstances in which it was prepared; and

s. must be read as a whole and sections should not be read out of context.

Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. Consultant accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared. Any estimates or opinions regarding expected construction costs or construction schedule provided by Consultant represent Consultant’s judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Consultant does not make any representations, with respect to such estimates or opinions, and accepts no responsibility for any Ioss or damage arising from them. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk.

Except as agreed to in writing by Consultant and Client; as required by-Iaw; or to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. Consultant accepts no responsibility, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the

information for any injury, Ioss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report, except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of Consultant to use and rely upon the Report and the information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use.

Pc-Rp}-2(11 s-I 0-08-8ydeijham Medk.al- Stoimwa(er

Page 126 of 189

7Fore.- .

Ell ‘?)’ ! !‘I ‘i:! ri !? l! ! ! r! l’.-

1329 Gaminem Road. Sub 210

813 834 9009 tel

Kingaton. ON, Canada K7P OL8

888.884.9392 fax

October 23, 2015 Mr. John Pelow

Pelow Engineering 1089 Dunham Street

Kingston, Ontario K7P 2K2 Dear Mr. Pelow

Regarding:

8ydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management R*port

The enclosed report details the infrastructure upgrades required for this development and recommendations for the proposed development.

Stormwater runoff from the Sydenham Medical Centre parking lot building to be directed to the fmer strip and proposed storrnwater management facility (SWMF). The remainder of the proposed Sydenham Medml Centre development should be directed to the proposed side yard swalea to be constructed along the property line.

The Report demonatrates that adequate stormwater management controls are available for the proposed development.

If you have any enquiries or wish to discuss further, please contact this office. Sincerely,

FOREFRONT Engineering Inc.

A/

Kyle Nielissen, P.Eng. Project Manager Kyle.Nie)issen@Forefrontenq.ca KN:kn

Fl-Rfl-2CijS-lOAJ?dmhwn Med? 8kmsmbi

Page 127 of 189

r)REFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Cgineering lnc

Sydenham Medml Centsr Stormwater Managsment Report

FOREFRONT Signatures

Report Prepared By: Brandon Travers, CET

p Report Revi*wd By:

xyte sieiissen, P. Eng

.?

Pl-%l$l Ll?hmm Madm- ?et

Page 128 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Engineering lnc

Sydsnham Medical Cemre

c

Sformwater Management Repor(

P

Table of Contents

Statement of Qualifications and Limitations Letter of Transmittal

Page 1.

Introduction

2

Existing Conditions

2

Proposed Development

3

3.I Water Quantity 3.2 Drainage Plan 3.3 Analysis

3

3.3.1 Modified Rational Method

3 3 3

3.3.2 Design Storrn Events 3.3.3 Hydrology. 3.3.4 PreDevelopmentFlows 3.3.5 PostDevelopmentFlows 3.4 Water Quality 3.4.I Quality Contml 3.4.2 FilterStrip(Pre-Treatment)

4

3.4.3 BioretentionFilter.

8

3.4.4 Drainage

9

4 s

6 7

7 8

3.5 Maintenance

9

Quality Control (Short Term)

9

s.

Conclusions

10

Appendices Appendix A. Figure 2: Pre and Post Development Catchment Areas Site Plan and Grading Plan *

Details

Appendix B. Modified Rational Method Analysis - s Year Event Modified Rational Method Analysis-100 Year Event *

Bio-retention Sizing Calculation

Fj-Rp}-201 s-I 0-08-Sydenham Medical- S}oimwa}er

1

Page 129 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Sydenham Medical Cemre Stormwater Management Repor}

Engineering lnc

c P

1. Introduction Forefront has assembled relevant supporting information for the proposed commercial development known as the Sydenham Medical Centre, located in Sydenham Ontario. The Iegal description of the Iand is Concession 4, Lot 2, Sydenham, Ontario. The property is located on the south side of Rutledge Road, and south of Ashwood Drive. Refer to Figure 1 : Location Plan for the site Iocation.

l

11

r

7

j

;1 ??

E<-..‘rk

l

I

[ s’

‘:’l

s%l

a

:.(

W

r’l

b

( i

j&

m ? la’al

‘!

. ILI’

ei+ ,%

S

]s

7

?

I J

l

t%

11

l

.i’

4

W f,

il

,t

1!

J

Figure 1: Location Plan (lmage Courtesy of)

The subject area is currently zoned RC 12 classified as special rural commercial. The property has a number of structures and uses. The subject site construction limit is approximately O.51 hectares in area.

The proposed development will consist of a 311(112 single storey building, and 297 rr12 of paved area. Refer to Appendix A: Site Plan & Grading Plan

2. Existing Conditions The Soil Survey of Frontenac County identifies the soil cover in the northern area as Lyons Loam. Lyons Loam consists of calcareous glacial till that contains thin fragments of Iimestone; and is a poorly-drained soil. The southern part of the site identifies as Muck. Muck consists of fairly well decomposed plant material; and is a very poorlydrained soil.

Existing drainage at the subject development generally sheet flows to the south west, directing runoff to a Iow Iying field that flows south of the site. The flows are directed to the downstream Millhaven Creek south of the site.

@{-Rp}-2015-1 0-IMI-Sydsnh am Medical- S}ormwa}er

2

Page 130 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Engineering lnc

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Managemen( Repof

c P

Refer to Figure 2: Pre and Post Development Catchment Areas in Appendix A for the pre development catchment areas for Sydenham Medical Center.

3. Proposed Development The proposed development will consist of a new building, and asphalt parking Iot. To provide water quality and quantity stormwater management controls onsite, a filter strip for pre-treatment and bioretention swale is proposed.

3.I Water Quantity Urbanization Ieads to an increase in impermeable surfaces (roof tops and parking areas). The resultant increased peak flows increase the risk to life, environment and property damage. Water quantity control is generally required when there will be downstream quantity impacts. Consistent with general Stormwater Management practices, both stormwater quality and quantity control is proposed for the majority of the site. Post development flows will be maintained to pre development Ievels for all storm events up to and including the 100 year design event. 3.2 Drainage Plan It is recommended that Sydenham Medical Centre development drainage be directed southerly to the Millhaven

Creek through side yard swaIes and the proposed Stormwater Management Facility. Major and minor flow paths will be directed to the proposed SWMF and side yard swaIes. Concentrated outlet locations will be enhanced with rip-rap and geotextile.

Refer to Figure 2: Pre and Post Development Catchment Areas in Appendix A for the post development catchment areas for Sydenham Medical Center. 3.3 Analysis The Rational Method and Modified Rational Method will be utilized to design the proposed SWMF. 3.3.1 Modified Rational Method

The Rational Method calculates the peak flow rate in a catchment due to the runoff contributed from the entire

upstream catchment area at a specific location. The Rational Method is represented by then following equation: Q = 0.0028 C I A Where: C = Runoff coefficient

I = Rainfall intensity (mm/hr) A = Drainage area (ha)

When developing the rational method the runoff volume was not considered, and the Rational Method alone was not meant for detention basin design. However, the modified Rational Method, actually an extension of the conventional Rational method, has been used in the past for sizing of detention basins. This method should generally be restricted to drainage areas less than 20 acres, and this method is expected to be appropriate for the subject site. The Modified Rational method uses the peak flow calculations paired with assumptions about the inflow and outflow

Fl-Flpk-201 s-1 0-08-8ydenham Medical- Skotmvtakv

3

Page 131 of 189

Pelow Engineering

FOREFRONT

Engineering lnc

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management Repork

c P

hydrographs to compute an approximation of storage volumes for simple detention calculations. This approach assumes the stormwater runoff hydrograph (detention basin inflow hydrograph) for the design storm is trapezoidal in shape. The peak runoff rate is calculated using the Rational Formula and it is assumed that the peak of the outflow hydrograph falls on the recession Iimb of the inflow hydrograph and the rising Iimb of the outflow hydrograph can be approximated by a straight line. The storage volume is approximated with the following equation; Sti= Qpt.i-Qi((’ea+tc)/2) ‘Storage Formula (Aron and Kibler, 1990) Where:

td = Duration of Storm

Q=Peak runoff rate (m3/s)

(min)

C=Composite runoff coeffIcient

Qp = Peak Flow (m3/s)

I=Rainfall intensity (mm/hr)

Qd = Discharge Rate (m3/s)

A=Drainage area (ha)

Sd = Required Storage

tc= Time of Concentration (min)

Volume (m3)

The design storm duration is that duration that maximizes the detention storage volume, So, for a given return period. An allowable target outflow is set based on predevelopment conditions. The storm duration is td, and is varied until the storage volume is maximized. The tc (time of concentration) will be calculated with The Bransby Williams and Kirpich Method and the shorter duration will be selected, this will provide a conservative flow estimate. Typically the Bransby Williams method is utilized for catchment areas with a C factor greater than O.4 and the Kirpich method is utilized for catchments with a C factor less than O.4. A minimum time of concentration of 15 min is required. 3.3.2 Design Storrn Events Quality Event

The Ministry of Environment Stormwater Management Manual refers to a 1 2.5mm to 25mm 4 hour Chicago storm event for sizing quality treatment facilities in Ontario that are not included in table 3.2 of the manual. The following formula has been developed for a 25mm- 4 hr Chicago Design storm for this area: bsmm: 498

(lc49.7)0.825

Minor and Major Event

The minor and major design storm events were based on IDF rainfall statistics that describe the frequency of rainfall depths over a specified duration. Rainfall intensities with various durations and return periods for the site were obtained from the MTO Drainage Manual. A minimum tc (time of concentration) of 15 minutes is to be used. 3.3.3 Hydrology Runoff Coefficients

The runoff coefficient (C) is a dimensionless coefficient relating the amount of runoff to the amount of precipitation received. It is a larger value for areas with Iow infiltration and high runoff (pavement, steep gradient), and lower for

Fl-Rp}-20 15-1 0-08-Sydenham Msdiaal- Stormwater

4

Page 132 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Engineering lnc

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management Repork

c P

permeable, well vegetated areas (forest, flat Iand). Coefficients were assigned based on surface cover and soil conditions as follows;

LandUse&Topography

Runoff Coefficients

Asphalt, concrete, roof areas

o.g

Grassed area, parkland

0.25

Commercial

0.8

Industrial

0.7

Residential

Single family (<400 m2) Single family (>400 m2)

0.4

Semi-detached

0.5

Townhouses

0.6

o.s '

0.6 l

Apartments Institutions

o.ss

Soil Texture

l Loam i Clay

ii Siorlt iLoam D Sand lffi i or : Loam

Land Use & Topography

iClay

Cultivated

Flat 0-5% Slopes

0.22

0.35

0.55

Rolling 5-10% Slopes Hilly 10-30% Slopes

0.3

0.45

0.6

0.4

0.65

0.7

Flat 0-5% Slopes

0.1

0.28

0.4

Rolling 5-10% Slopes Hilly 10-30% Slopes

0.15

0.35

0.45

0.22

0.4

o.ss

Flat 0-5% Slopes

0.08

0.25

0.35

Rolling 5-10% Slopes Hilly 10-30% Slopes

0.12

0.3

0.42

0.18

0.35

0.52

Pasture

Woodlands and Cutover

Coverage Bare Rock

50%

70%

Flat 0-5% Slopes

0.4

0.55

0.75

Rolling 5-10% Slopes Hilly 10-30% Slopes

0.5

0.65

0.8

0.55

0.7

0.85

Lakes and Wetlands

0.05

Note: Values are a combination of the City of Kingston Subdivision Guidelines and Ministry of Transportation Design . Chart 1.07

11

1

In order to reflect the unique hydrologic properties within each sub-catchment, a variety of surface cover types were defined.

Due to the drainage characteristics of the soil at this site there is minimal opportunity for infiltration. Based on the existing site conditions a runoff coefficient of O.3 is recommended. 3.3.4 PreDevelopmentFlows

Runoff coefficients, and catchment characteristics were assigned for the existing catchments and are summarized in Table 3-1 below.

Fj-Rpj-21)I !i-I 0-08-Sydenham Msdical- 81icamvraket

s

Page 133 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management Report

Engineering lnc

c P

Table 3-I Existing Conditions Sydenham Medical Center- Overland Flow Time of Concentration Calculations Hydrologic Units - Existing Conditions

Tc

Hydrologic Unit

EXI

Est’d C

0.30

Area

(ha)

0.51

Length (m)

102

Average Width

Grade(%)

(m)

68.04

(Bransby Williams) (when C = >0.4)

Tc

Tc

(Kirpich Method) (C<0.4)

(Airport Method) (C<0.4)

5.62

3.27

22.25

1.67

A minimum time of concentration of 15 min is proposed. 3.3.5 PostDevelopmentFlows The development of this site will increase the imperviousness of the site and hence the runoff. Runoff coefficients and catchment characteristics were assigned for the proposed catchments and are detailed in Table 3-2. Table 3-2 Proposed Conditions Sydenham Medical Center- Overland Flow Time of Concentration Calculations Hydrologic Units - Proposed Conditions

Tc

Hydrologic Unit

Est’d C

Area

(ha)

Length (m)

Average Width

Grade(%)

(m)

(Bransby Williams) (when C = >0.4)

Tc

Tc

(Kirpich Method) (C<0.4)

(Airport Method) (C<0.4)

0.30

0.04

184.00

7.16

0.50

16.62

g.ig

44.47

Catchment 2

0.30

0.16

84.00

15.72

1.00

5.75

3.43

23.90

Catchment 3

o.go

0.14

285.00

14.25

0.25

26.09

14.97

17.39

Catchment 4

0.30

0.17

270.00

21.80

2.35

15.49

6.06

32.32

Total

0.46

0.51

Catchment 1

A minimum time of concentration of 15 min is proposed.

Results shown in Table 3-3 quantify the peak rate of surface runoff calculated with the rational method and assigned catchment characteristics, both the pre-development and uncontrolled post development flow rates are calculated.

Fl-Rpk-201 S-I 0-08-Sydenham Mediiial- Stotmvra{er

6

Page 134 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Managemem Repork

Engineering lnc

c P

Table 3-3 Uncontrolled Peak Flows in Pre & Post Development Conditions 25mm- 4 hr

Description

Design Storm

Syr Design Storm

100 yr Design Storm

Peak Flow Q

Peak Flow Q

(LPS)

(LPS))

Peak Flow Q (LPS)

Pre-development

15

27

47

Post Development

23

39

72

Note: The MTO District 8 West of Kingston was utilized for the intensity calculations

Conveyance controls and a storage system is proposed to Iimit post developments flows shown in Table 3-3 to pre development Ievels.

Conveyance controls and a storage system is proposed to Iimit post developments flows to pre-development Ievels. A bio-retention filter facility is proposed for quality and quantity control. The quality outlet will include a subdrain with an oveflow structure and the quantity control will be controlled with a rip-rap weir. Quantity control volumes required for bio-retention filter facility are based on the s year and 100 year design storm and are 13.9 m3 and 23.8 m3, detailed modified rational calculations are included in Appendix B. Quantity control volumes proposed are in excess of the required volumes. Refer to the Modified Rational Method Calculations for the s Year and 100 Year events in Appendix B for the peak flow, outlet and storage calculations.

3.4 Water Quality The Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual by the MOE describes various Ievels of protection of water quality, based on a general relationship between the end-of-pipe storrnwater management facilities long-term suspended solids removal and the Iethal and chronic effects of suspended solids on aquatic life. Based on the characteristics of the receiving watercourse, Enhanced Protection (corresponding to the end-of-pipe storage volumes required for the Iong-term removal of 80% of suspended solids) is proposed. The proposed development shall utilize a treatment train approach with pre-treatment being provided by a filter strip and end of pipe controls with a bioretention filter type facility. The filter strip will provide between 20% and 60% removal of total suspended solids and the bioretention filter facility will provide a minimum of 80% removal of suspended solids. The combined removal efficiency is expected to be between 80% and 99% removal of total suspended solids in excess of the 80% required. 3.4.I Quality Control Quality Event

The Ministry of Environment (MOE) Stormwater Management Manual utilized continuous event modeling for storm events of 12.5 mm to 25 mm to develop table 3.2 in the manual. An additional approach is to utilize the 25mm 4 hour Chicago water quality storm.

11-Rpk-201 s-I 0-08-Sydenham Medical- Skotmvtaker

7

Page 135 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Management Repork

Engineering Inc

c P

It is proposed to utilize the 25mm storm water quality volume to size the facility. Water Quality Volume: (WQV= V x C x A) C= % Impervious A= Impervious Area (m2) V= Storm Volume (m) V= 0.025 m for 25 mm event

Below is a summary of the impervious areas and associated water quality volume (WQV) calculations based on the 25mm 4 hour Chicago Storm event:

Land Description

Area (m2)

% Impervious

Treatment

WQV (m3)

Building

311

0.9

Filter Strip and Bio-

7.0

Retention Filter

Parking Lot

297

o.g

Filter Strip and Bio-

6.7

Retention Filter

Landscaped Area

4492

0.3

Total

5,100

0.46

Bio-Retention Filter

33.7 58.6

Water quality is not a concern for rooftops and area with direct rainfall on pervious Iandscaped areas of the site. 3.4.2 Filter Strip (Pre-Treatment) Filter strips discharge in the form of sheet flow and are most effective when utilized as pre-treatment features. The purpose of a filter strip is to slow runoff velocity and filter out suspended solids. Native grass vegetation is proposed with an incorporated pea gravel diaphragm to be used as a Ievel spreader to maintain sheet flow. The ideal slope is between 1 and 5%.

According to the"Low Impact Development Storrnwater Management Planning and Design Guide” (2010) by the Toronto and Credit Valley Conservation Authority, filter strip water quality treatment is moderate but highly variable and as such filter strips should be used in a series. Removal efficiencies of Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorous and Total Heavy Metal are between 20 to 80%. The minimum width of the filter strip should be 2 metres in length. In addition to quality control the typical volumetric runoff reduction for a 2.0 metre filter strip is approximately 20%. As is the case, filter strips are best utilized for areas Iess than 2 hectares. The following criteria was utilized in the filter strip design: *

2.0m wide filter strip 1%-4% side slope Pea gravel diaphragm 300 mm of Topsoil Native grass plantings

3.4.3 BioretentionFilter

A bioretention filter and vegetated filter strip are to be utilized for the proposed development. The total site area is O.51 ha, quality control will be provided for the entire site. For a 25 mm design storm the required control volume is 58.65 1’y13

F{-Rpt-201 s-I 0-08-!iydenham Medk.al- S}ornwvater

8

Page 136 of 189

FOREFRONT

Pelow Engineering

Engineering lnc

Sydenham Medical Centre Stormwater Managemem Repork

c P

See Appendix B: Bioretention Sizing Calculation, and Appendix A: Details for details. The following criteria was utilized in the design: *

1 .3 m deep

1 .0 m filter media (75mm mulch, 1 .0 mm Engineered soil, 0.3m Gravel Storage Layer) 0.3 m gravel storage layer (50mm clean stone)

100 mm underdrain

@

Overflow structure

3.4.4

The interior side slopes are 3:1 Native Plantings Drainage

Side yard swaIes shall be incorporated along the north, south, and east property lines and an entrance culvert shall be incorporated to allow minor and major flow conveyance onsite. The parking area shall be graded to discharge runoff to the filter strip and bioretention filter. 3.6

Maintenance

Maintenance access to the bioretention filter and filter strip is provided via the asphalt parking area. Periodic maintenance inspection of the facilities should be undertaken. The inspection should provide a summary of the following items: *

Observations resulting from the inspection of the facility over the course of the year. These observations should include comments on the:

hydraulic operation of the facilities (detention time, evidence or occurrence of overflows) condition of vegetation in and around facility occurrence of obstructions at the inlet and outlet

evidence of spills and oil/grease contamination frequency of trash build-up Measured sediment depths in the facilities; Maintenance and operational control undertaken during the year; Recommendations for inspection and maintenance program for the coming year.

The bioretention filter and filter strip will require routine periodic maintenance including weed control, and trash removal will be required several times per year. Removal of accumulated sediment, replacement of mulch and replacement of plantings should be evaluated annually with a recommended replacement period every s years.

Quality Control (Short Term)

Silt fencing is to be provided at all side slopes and down gradient locations to ensure sediment and erosion control during construction. Other control devices such as rock flow check dams will also be provided where drainage is concentrated. Sediment and erosion management measures also serve to provide a limit to the grading operations.

Pl-Rp}-201 s-I 0-08-Sydenham Medk.al- Skoymwahy

9

Page 137 of 189

FOREFRONT

Engineering lnc

Pelow Engineering

Sydenham Medical Cemre Stormwater Management Repork

c P

The stormwater facility and components are to be constructed concurrently with initial phases of development. The timeframe for land to remain exposed before it is stabilized with sod, mulch, or hydroseeding is to be minimized. Topsoil is to be stockpiled away from watercourses and wetlands. Inspection of the sediment control works should be undertaken before and after all rainfall (and snowmelt) events. Maintenance is to be undertaken as required to ensure the proper operation of all sediment and erosion controls.

s. Conclusions Preliminary calculations find that the proposed infrastructure is capable of and will effectively service the proposed demand created by this development. A 2.0 m wide filter strip and bioretention filter shall be utilized for on-site stormwater quality and quantity control.

Fj-Rp(-2015-10-08-Sydenham Medical- Stoimwa(er

10

Page 138 of 189

F:Jj:,9,,j9!,jl9 I!!..

Engineevipg rate

Appendix A Figure ‘2: Pre ai’icl Post Deixsloprrierit Catchmai-it ,?ireas Seriricing P!an F< Graclirig Plari ?e’ta!!s

Page 139 of 189

l iQ’,.-….- . -., :,-7–,’.a…. .’l. -+-.-= .-……=-,…’. =. .) a’a’ mh a ‘u-a’tis– " .’l:a

.’” ., l . a-si. .’ ‘aa =b* ‘aM= =-’. S, . l>a,’,,.=-) ’ ….,.. . .-.

‘J. =Q, ,- =r-.. l::: ….. ‘11.. … … ..- ..- ..- ..,….. ‘X’%T. ’ a ’ a .- …….. - .. …..

• ‘.– - -’-’ - -’ -’ -.- l 1

1 y ‘%

S am

S

l

l=

a

• -l

?l

EX?STING STORMWATER CATCHMENT AREAS

l

k

l

-l

l

S }

S }

‘.}

-l /

l

l

PROPOSED STORMWATER CATCHMENT AREAS

9io.rp,fr,on.t.

[ L

E

ginep’i!i?g-I’n-t

F T

IIJ Grfflnrn hr4 S&y 70

%%@; f,, F;T{11! (ip fllB IBBB.8[MjNB2hx

I-

P(laW (N[ilN(EtllNli

l l

%#

SYDEN)IAM MEDl[Al €ENTEI)

;AN%Np;BlaNxlM [Aii)IMtiAi’i’

l= “? i?U’T’

l?’l Fl[,.2

Page 140 of 189

Page 141 of 189

1ri-4-”-

?,

==@- ‘:?i? <ffi

fe

!-

-t

‘a " " a’ - sl

lllllNffilll Xlll

Kill 1.11 611 l’llL

IIJI??

aff ‘%00 00 !111 t

t

!!l!mN

k,” ?!a? # ‘?-?DZ?

41

%

#=

Q;Q: ‘L!”’=-

Itcfiltll 0-m +lu

{ICTION k-k lalu

ROCK FLOW CHECK OAM lltl wlal 05

TIPE B - Wml at(lTFXTlu

TTP! A - IllmlOllT aElJlEXmX

" ..‘4T-:e?%’….?""" IlFOR SEWER AND CULVERT OUTLETS ? g “4E-A:iffif ? oxamo pzu6A stmwo o*wi+i5-,-? %- ?

k!fl+Rll LMl]l? }ll[llll? [llMllha i ll*’?*J’.i,

?(

?xv?vihv"o’rmaq io”’l’l’li

RIP-RAP TREATMENT

i OPSD 810

i

l

!ILT FENI:E 9ARRIEll

!

’ l ’ l % ‘a?,– ‘? l ’ l ’ ? 010%

!llrma#NCRTleglO9sMM? {I(mwaRAYllAR’A’@llffl!

?iootioaqxVe

= : == :? - ,?.

,-+==,<

10maal43? I!lmal-RMl’.ll)A’k’ 101lmmaRANulllR’a’

isollMn

] IZ

W’ -’;=""" .=l

2% MIN PRO?(l!ED ORoUND

?!

4(x,Q,04

.iycuavviq wo-rg:posmahyaiowmssuayyl

WAV@ MA7MllM&llW kl?DN MsR IXeB@ llffl l HAl0t A A MA)!MuM 5} 5} !11

-VARI!!

ImlaNDMkRAWlOMX]ThRklMl asPall.aC.

{a?lDEYARD SWALE DETAIL

,/?i’lnpicoi CuRB FACE CONCRETE 81DEWALK DETAIL

t?ia

?s

I?Q

D(PR(!Stn CuRTh

,lRO’?l E(!: 0} (0108 RkuP m 8{. ‘PAINTh CC[lmASllN0 COkl)N

‘:

l:

ItXTUR( A} IER-miD 316.030

A, 4g

l.lm

I.5m

I.54%?

MI

:l"l :l?

Irs,

:l-i6

i.isl

:lal -l

l

10 lk81t 3.B.3.I

:Lo

10 lAaU 3.&}.2

l

Slh Ynnl SWOI?

!l"l

? ll.Ul ?

J

RAlllu@ @l!all(111

,/??‘ITYPICAL CjlRs rUiMP DETAILS ‘?hrs

T

‘P

s’=wri4:- r

0.%.a TABlli IJll.l RlMPRmMOkOlg

J

RAM? as PER o.a.c. Is NOT Sll?lE?.

[1

%

a!laa 1+0aa !-LIl?s

QPLAN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FA91LITY ‘?ulS

unI.

?o ‘ra’aa":.‘a"a-’. :–?’.?-..-:

:’? b’A:‘aaa" ‘:.) - U 10 m li 41 $% k41? #lll %l-l b 11 II Iw mtil ?b s*{k l la I % % -a%jl Iln0 fflW ll? 00% IM?l

I# lal

Om?da %*

“?a"4’ a” a “?!a " ‘a " a a l’iaZ” a “?‘ofia :”?’l

A- 4; E;??#.i:"-#m=io..=55= ?:,sa w?I- tafl lim; a- R–I

%{*a

1. bl

ysby giaaa mi

l

1% mvsl 111% mol

• l.&a y a 1.!% 0 - 10 v* #W0 hmsu *

%TORMWATERMANAGEMENT FAClLITla ‘?-’

] m m m m E7

?

RMWATER MANACiEMENT FACILITY

FJFOrefront Pnthnaxxinirataimit? l ?4?Engitixeiing lue i

m!lGvkynRny?.lS*vNl (inntla nkCrnrjn i(’?P[} }l:.l.B[@llnl. 1.}HBE}4E}!21rt.

2 l+

P(knW ENGIN((tllNG

i

l

dmh ,’

‘@!?

lj?ll:

HIJW-DIITY

amll M !Jl

IlllllLlll k4 Clff

l’ l’T’-?l *’-’ i= rr

52 L l""

Page 142 of 189

FlEo=!gn,!,

Engineav:ng (tte

Appendix B Nlodified Ratior’ia? Methoci Analysis- s yaar r-Evem (’!10c]!‘f!e(II’! Ra-1:tonal ?/lekMod Arl:a!y'3!s- al00 ‘/,eE’.r ‘E?/ent B!oere(en’f!oi’l S!z!ng Calt,oula’tions

Page 143 of 189

E

-E

-E ,5%, E’eo

L ‘il: o

s -# § S11} k’-,

%

@sLm

7 E % :,, N -, () ,l =e . 16 ‘+ ?’ le ‘aa

l a J ’l) O TZ t4 o [1

.-

U

o

11 : 11 11

‘j&es

11

i

z

f

4

j

ti

7=

jg

D

E

3 %

W

uL

? “f8”?’:

y%a§l fflE ! te . 4

h

<H

j. %. j g. {

!

N

o f:

i;

j 1

• a-

? C

:!i 3

‘}.J{{ %XMXA

11

:l:0 tl) i

TE

i’?4*!

’ ui < m;,

t’ t ffl j’ %’ ;

lJ’s

JM a 7

i: ? &

0,d }

7 ‘1:11

m

m

! E

%

E

E

2

; E

%

‘E

l:l

E

J:

E

Cl

E

o

oi

m

k

E E

o Cl

111

ll’l

‘;

E E

e

o N

o

M l.n ;

N

z E ?

l-

1%

;oi 2"-Ey ala) E

z

‘5

‘S

m

u

..

l/I

2,4 5

a)

e

T

,-,:tltjg

l-% 4im

Ale

T’

10

ti6 j,,

2,i tP

1%

T: ‘; T r

.ggl% %E Ci -M

€

E 6

IJ

R3

I.h

!

El

%

mw ffllll

J:

;

; E

8

g

110(lan !Q

(IC

-0 9'5 d8

‘;n :a =E (g%. -ffl

N

j;

N

T

Tn

‘:

(:)

)@ko<

E (S

Ci

E o Cll)C w@l

a).

o

iCM .!:)E

31

,g

E

*K+

o

‘;;o

1%

m

o 11

;

(!1

‘111

ll’l

;

111

2

o

i.il<ii’+ LJ, IJ ,.

g. 4 %2

ut/I fiVl

s

%I

1:I

LLI, “t;I

111

0

a) ‘;;

m

al m5 (i#

0

5

l%l

N

’t -

)(: l/l()

1’o; 3;

c

ljl VIS

’el o

E

E T

11

i

E

j) 0

o

j; go ,!) 4

57

04o wllll rLQ

?

‘E E

: A.

al

E ?

t.)

!

g;

ai

(l

cE Cl

%

H

u’l

M> ffl(B (llm

‘i%.e wE

z’*

z 3-

g0

V!

E

j’a {Vl

‘, o ,0 Cl,

Cl

01 )aa

7 ‘oS

2

j:

H? 3

O

ti:E

’s

la

kii2o 2’ rsS 32

0

3 ;

s

Jll’l :)iu

O

,z

Ual

kll

T Th M

M i;

l:)

E 5 ‘a

-,, E

%

lill

:, 7c-

3

1% l/}

g .E

3

o

Page 144 of 189

f ? 2

.ffi

E e’o g -s g 6 ?j § y? utri

‘E’

#%

15-aalnl

s E : 3

% ? a: ‘o

o k *? "

K e

N

i 11

(l

g ‘x

??s l

fl

‘i

4

11{

p

j!ja(

5ffl

o

J Z’ ) 4 {” )a

.=a

}#.ii.2

El

r’o ;"" , i§i

5- W

%1}&

11

W

A"

? (, E ,g H8e?a:

7%

:5

‘i

.:c? ? .=7

C4? ‘:J#

“Tii ‘ffl (TB u) 11 D<

IS 11

0

Ci17 ;

lij

m N

m 3 eL

i:i:

; ! %

E

E

E ? ‘:X Ei

% ‘E E

%

‘;t

‘;i

e

d

J:

z

eL

‘Ei !l

8

p

E E

lin

E E

‘a

0%

Ual

‘;

111’

7 IXI ? ‘;21’ T ;

‘;

ffl

C’

4

‘S

1%

ffl

%

o

E

s

’t) ?

W E,OE o - #

’t) o

wfiX>-

1.5

?

E

jQ

;

%

ila ILe

1%

%

%

1lltYP 516

Iff’IIIQ aTi

‘;: ‘; T h IP

e

!;;

,l-.mEH

-,

‘;’

!!w

1%

14}

7

8

-E

bll laM #% 11)#

J:

0

:!i

:’

'

; *

: ?

'

‘S

m ‘S

-l;, 4g% +[

EIE 3o

ti

6

(y %

:!! !5

taZ

&8

; ‘-X

ffi ?

N

N

S

’m

S

N

i o” oC :’

i

0

(tl 0

E)

m ?, d jb5 7 -E

00

516

B a 8 ‘(:

Let

%

E

o

‘a

a l)w

‘;; ‘ffl

l’ll

ln

‘E’ 0

’t’ll ‘ffl olll ‘;; N

Z

IJI

Z

’e

a)

110

:a" E

h

s

-5

C)

s

116 m

-d

t (l’l lu

u

111

%i

,IJ ,

2

(). S %2

“s ‘011

Sl/l

2P uo (111

2111 rs5 3s

:3 ;§o

o;,

!!11!)

03 00

sb

C:i ; ?

X r

eh

‘S

m s

Q

T e5 ‘-# ‘; ; ; 0

IN

m N

E

bc

il: o

‘M,J:

@%

Cl

1119 ' 3 ui’ mffi

0

H N

IJ-

alQ

:% %>

aiE

‘F:E

’l)

‘V Ih,4 0 l%l

ti

E 60 .ij0 e a’ani ILCI

TF 0

E N

E

%I

%

E: J)

E a

42 a

e

‘; ? E

41:

:F,

3

H m

0 l%l

X

0 ffl

X 111

‘001

0

?

111

d

5 ‘a

..;; E %

110

Cl o 111

N ..

3

g %E

3

‘01

Page 145 of 189

Bioretenion Sizing WQV= Vx CxA

C= % Impervious

A= Impervious Area (m2) V= Storm Volume (m) V= 0.025 m for 25 mm event

5100 m2

A= C=

0.46

V=

0.025 m

WQV=

58.65 m3

dr=i"ts/V,

Maximum depth of stone reservoir below the underdrain pipe

dcmax”*(fs dp/I)/Vr

Maximum allowable depth of the cell (filter bed and gravel stora@e layer)

i=

Infiltration rate for native soils (mm/hr)

ts= Vr=

Time to drain (design for 48 hour time to drain is recommended) Void space ratio for filter bed and gravel storage layer (assume O.4)

d,= P’

Maximum surface ponding depth (mm)

i=

15 mm/hr

ts=

48 hrs

Vr=

0.4

d.= P-

100 mm

d,=

1800 mm

dc max=

1550 mm 900 mm

d,‘c proposed=

Al = WQV /dp+ (dc" Vr)

Af = Footprint surface area (m2) WQV = Water quality volume (m3) dc = Bioretention cell depth (m) Vr = void space ratio for filter bed and gravel storage Iayer (assume O.4) dp=Maximum surface ponding depth (mm)

151.3 m2

At: 2.

Including 100 year storage requirement

.

190 m is provided

Page 146 of 189

Payment Listing For the period of June22, 2016 to July 5, 2016

Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of June22, 2016 to July 5, 2016

2,282,478.60

Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #13

Pay date June 22, 2016

85,324.15

For the period of June 5, 2016 to June 18, 2016 Council Reimbursement

Pay date June 22, 2016

1,825.97

For the period of June 5, 2016 to June 18, 2016 Council Honorarium

Pay date June 30, 2016

Total Payments

9,825.47

$

2,379,454.19

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending JULY 5, 2016 in the amount of

$

2,379,454.19

Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer

Page 147 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

Ranges: Cheque Date:

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

12:58:29 PM

From: 6/22/2016

To: 7/5/2016

Page:

1

Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC

10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000005703

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

05047609

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL

61269 61334

THE FRONTENAC NEWS JUNE 16TH ADVERTISING JUNE 23RD ADVERTISING

Total EFT000000005703 EFT000000005727 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005727

Total Gen

Amount $161.55 $161.55 $726.64 $745.33 $1,471.97

$1,633.52

0020 TaxC Cheque EFT000000005717

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000046400 2ND QUARTER LEVY

Total EFT000000005717

Total TaxC

Amount $1,344,679.75 $1,344,679.75

$1,344,679.75

1000 Cheque 067630

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 248975

Total 067630 EFT000000005724

7/5/2016

Vendor

TOM’S LAWN CARE JUNE LAWN CARE

Amount $254.40 $254.40

EVERTEMP INC 29023 29066

Total EFT000000005724 EFT000000005732 7/5/2016 129636 Total EFT000000005732 EFT000000005750 7/5/2016

Description

REPLACE FILTERS, CHECK PUMP SPRING MAINTENANCE HAVEN HOME ENTERPRISE INC CORRECT SUPERIIOR INFRACTIONS

R&D NELSON GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15/05-15/06 SYDENHAM MAY - 40 HRS @ $15.00 15/05-15/06 SYDENHAM JUNE - 45 HRS @ $15.00 15/05-15/06 SYDENHAM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005750 EFT000000005769 7/5/2016 60499

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE BATTERIES, HOSE NOZZLE SET

Total EFT000000005769

Total

$184.91 $241.33 $426.24 $525.59 $525.59 $610.56 $686.88 $289.07 $1,586.51 $29.49 $29.49

$2,822.23

1100 Counc Cheque 067632 Total 067632 EFT000000005768

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

TROPHY HOUSE 9389

VOLUNTEER WALL PLAQUES

7940 7940 9409 1260 1260

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION VOLUNTEER DINNER MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005768

Total Counc

$232.33 $232.33 $6.38 $14.80 $341.10 $7.99 $80.83 $451.10

$683.43

1250 Clk Cheque 067604

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND

Amount

Page 148 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT SALES000000029218

Total 067604 EFT000000005717

7/5/2016

WORKPLACE INVESTIGATION TRAIN

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000046408 JUNE EAP

Total EFT000000005717 EFT000000005768 7/5/2016 7760 7760 862 6

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND PLATES COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR COFFEE, CREAM, SUGAR TWIN CREAM

202736

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE COFFEE POT

Total EFT000000005768 EFT000000005769 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005769

Total Clk

Page:

2 $210.53 $210.53 $265.53 $265.53 $6.09 $20.86 $25.05 $2.69 $54.69 $19.32 $19.32

$550.07

1275 Fin Cheque EFT000000005720

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

139005

CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY DISCHARGE OHRP LIEN

34874

MARCHANT MARKING DEVICES LTD. SELF INKING STAMP

Total EFT000000005720 EFT000000005740 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005740

Amount $228.06 $228.06 $72.19 $72.19

Total Fin

$300.25

Total GG

$1,350,669.25

20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067602

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 9439

Total 067602 067605

7/5/2016

Vendor

CAR DREAMS SUPPLIES INC. 4 TRUCKWASH

7/5/2016 16/04/20-1 16/04/20-2 16/04/21-3 16/04/23-4 16/04/30-5 16/05/12-6 16/05/24-7 16/05/24-8 16/05/24-9 16/06/06-10 16/06/12-11 16/06/13-12 16/06/21-13 16/06/21-14 16/06/21-15

Total 067621 067622

7/5/2016

Total 067636 EFT000000005703

7/5/2016

$345.98 $345.98

REPAIR TRUCK NEW TOPPERS MARKET GAS DIESEL GAS DIESEL DIESEL GAS GAS GAS DIESEL GAS DIESEL GAS GAS GAS DIESEL

$152.64 $152.64 $37.82 $52.51 $33.86 $25.22 $40.22 $35.72 $25.27 $54.03 $66.72 $67.57 $58.55 $59.16 $92.91 $32.61 $50.81 $732.98

NOONAN, MIKE 16/06/30-03

Total 067622 067636

Amount

CROSS WIRED INV-101

Total 067605 067621

Description

JUNE MOWING

WILLIAMS, KATHY MAR TO JUNE 2016 MARCH - 4 CLEANS @ $35 MAR TO JUNE 2016 APRIL - 5 CLEANS @ $35 MAR TO JUNE 2016 MAY - 4 CLEANS @ $35 MAR TO JUNE 2016 JUNE - 4 CLEANS @ $35

7/5/2016 06522866 06440515 06700702

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. JUNE PEST CONTROL JUNE PEST CONTROL JUNE PEST CONTROL

$250.00 $250.00 $140.00 $175.00 $140.00 $140.00 $595.00 $42.60 $34.53 $40.70

Page 149 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total EFT000000005703 EFT000000005704 7/5/2016

Page:

3 $117.83

9144135309

ACKLANDS - GRAINGER INC. OPTISORB

0000128200

AJ STONE COMPANY LIMITED 50’ HOSE

Total EFT000000005704 EFT000000005706 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005706 EFT000000005722 7/5/2016

$184.25 $184.25 $246.64 $246.64

DRAPER DOORS 9560

Total EFT000000005722 EFT000000005738 7/5/2016

GARAGE DOOR REPAIR

$1,460.26 $1,460.26

LEONARD FUELS 1057-714842 1057-714741 1057-713823 1057-711694 1057-710272

89.96L @ $.9372 99.83L @ $.9372 20L @ $1.0790 89L @ $.9372 39.24L @ $.9726

16/06/16-46

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 1 CLEAN @ $60

16/06/21-FIRE

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD BRESEE FARM BARN FIRE

A14409 A14191 A14318

PAT ROGERS TOWING SERVICE TOW CALL TOW CALL TOW CALL

Total EFT000000005738 EFT000000005739 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005739 EFT000000005742 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005742 EFT000000005746 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005746 EFT000000005749 7/5/2016

$83.96 $93.17 $21.96 $83.07 $38.04 $320.20 $60.00 $60.00 $1,521.31 $1,521.31 $412.13 $534.24 $267.12 $1,213.49

PUROLATOR INC. 431570077

Total EFT000000005749 EFT000000005754 7/5/2016

COURIER

597922

ROSEN ENERGY GROUP 1314.9L @ $.9625

10745

R. THURSTON TECHNOLOGIES REPEATER TOWER INTERFERENCE

11704460

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. INSPECTION 500 GAL TANK

TCL-152630

TURRIS COMMUNICATIONS LTD BELT CLIP - PAGER

Total EFT000000005754 EFT000000005755 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005755 EFT000000005762 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005762 EFT000000005771 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005771

Total Fire

$31.36 $31.36 $1,287.86 $1,287.86 $86.50 $86.50 $96.67 $96.67 $13.16 $13.16

$8,716.13

2101 Fire-VF Cheque 067593

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 9113454-2016

Vendor

Description

AIG INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA JULY - DEC VF INSURANCE

Amount

Total 067593

$1,546.59 $1,546.59

Total Fire-VF

$1,546.59

2110 Cvc# Cheque EFT000000005759

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SIGNS PLUS 2939

12 CIVIC NUMBER SIGNS

Total EFT000000005759

Total Cvc#

$109.91 $109.91

$109.91

2400 Police Cheque 067618

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 17100616047

Total 067618

Total Police

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES JUNE POLICE SERVICES

Amount $244,876.00 $244,876.00

$244,876.00

Page 150 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

4

2605 Build Cheque EFT000000005735

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 847118783

Vendor

Description

KAL TIRE ONTARIO OIL CHANGE

Total EFT000000005735

Total Build

Amount $52.44 $52.44

$52.44

2620 Anml Ctl Cheque EFT000000005726

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-AC-2016-JUNE JUNE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES

Total EFT000000005726 EFT000000005752 7/5/2016 15-039

RIVOIRE, THOMAS R TWP VS DOYLE

Total EFT000000005752

Total Anml Ctl

Amount $3,256.19 $3,256.19 $1,076.11 $1,076.11

$4,332.30

2625 Lvstck Cheque EFT000000005751

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

REDDEN, JOSEPH 16/06/13-KIER-CALF 16/06/13-COLIN KIER - CALF 16/06/13-KIER-CALF 50 KMS @ $.55 16/06/07-CUMPSON 16/06/07-CUMPSON-SHEEP 16/06/07-CUMPSON 52 KMS @ $.55 16/06/09-J P LALONDE 16/06/09-J P LALONDE-SHEEP 16/06/09-J P LALONDE 22 KMS @ $.55 16/06/10-GARRETT 16/06/10-GARRETT-LAMB 16/06/10-GARRETT 72 KMS @ $..55

Total EFT000000005751

Total Lvstck

Amount $50.00 $24.76 $50.00 $25.75 $50.00 $10.89 $50.00 $35.67 $297.07

$297.07

2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005726

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-P-2016-JUNE 20 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2016-JUNE 1200 KMS @ $..52

Total EFT000000005726

Total Bylaw enf

Amount $457.92 $634.98 $1,092.90

$1,092.90

Total PP&P

$261,023.34

30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067594 Total 067594 EFT000000005733

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

ANTRIM TRUCK CENTRE LTD. STOCK NO. HY8610 FT16 - 2000 STERLING 40804

7/5/2016 41346

INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES EXTENSION RELOCATION

Total EFT000000005733

Total PW OH

Amount -$3,052.80 -$3,052.80 $45.79 $45.79

-$3,007.01

3005 RdAdmOH Cheque EFT000000005729

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Total RdAdmOH

Description

J807606

GRAND & TOY LIMITED OFFICE SUPPLIES

157462

TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS BATTERY

Total EFT000000005729 EFT000000005772 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005772

Vendor

Amount $96.96 $96.96 $35.61 $35.61

$132.57

Page 151 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

5

3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067591 Total 067591 067594

Total 067594 067601 Total 067601 067613 Total 067613 067623

Date 7/5/2016

7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

407 ETR 16/05/04-AC80783

7/5/2016 10576B

BOB MARK NEW HOLLAND SALES LTD 4 TIRES

035

GILBERT & SON CONSTRUCTION INC. 6 HRS HAMMER RENTAL @ $230

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

KEELEY OFF RENO APR 1-MAY 31

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

471.20T 3" @ $7.95 43.58T 3: @ $7.95 REVELL FORD LINCOLN REPLACE COOLANT RESERVOIR

Total 067631 EFT000000005705

7/5/2016

8 HRS H/T PATCHING @ $75 8 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75 34.5 HRS H/T PATCHING @ $75 34.5 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75 9 HRS H/T PATCHING @ $75 9 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75

PS040642119

TOROMONT INDUSTRIES LTD. HOSE ASSY

38242988 38243025

AECOM CANADA LTD 16/04/09 - 16/06/10 HSMITH I 16/04/09 - 16/06/10 DESIGN

7910263 7910263 7910263

BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS TIRE REPAIRS TIRE REPAIRS TIRE REPAIRS

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005705 EFT000000005709 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005709 EFT000000005713 7/5/2016

$2,493.12 $2,493.12 $1,404.29 $1,404.29 $262.54 $262.54 $3,811.91 $352.56 $4,164.47 $455.17 $455.17 $610.56 $160.78 $2,633.04 $693.36 $686.88 $180.88 $4,965.50 $75.69 $75.69 $648.72 $16,988.46 $17,637.18 $45.79 $50.88 $20.35 $117.02

CINTAS 884738399 884738399 884738399 884739958 884735344 884735347 884725798 884741475 884741475 884741475 884739951 884739951 884739951

Total EFT000000005713 EFT000000005718 7/5/2016

$1,134.00 $262,579.61 $263,713.61

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06/10-05 16/06/10-05 16/06/08-02 16/06/08-02 16/06/09-03 16/06/09-03

Total 067629 067631

$27.08 $27.08

O. BETTSCHEN

506017 Total 067626 067629

Amount

NORR LIMITED

37057 36983 Total 067624 067626

TOLL CHARGES

ANTRIM TRUCK CENTRE LTD. HY8610 17-16 WESTERN STAR LICENSING STOCK NO. HY8610 17-16-2017 WESTERN STAR TANDEM

0078162 Total 067623 067624

Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS

CATARAQUI REGION CONSERVATION SALMON LK CULVERT PERMIT FEE DESERT LK CAUSEWAY PERMIT FEE OTTER LK CULVERT PERMIT FEE

Total EFT000000005718 EFT000000005719 7/5/2016 90062207 90061937 90061987

CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION 28.42T 3" @ $7.45 433.57T 3" @ $7.45 37.98T 5/8" @ $7.95

$190.84 $13.29 $9.51 $35.62 $53.52 $94.22 $68.37 $201.53 $13.29 $9.51 $131.82 $13.29 $9.51 $844.32 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 $960.00 $215.46 $3,286.88 $307.26

Page 152 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 90061751 90061751 90061815 90061888

63.56T 3" @ $7.45 24.14T 5/8" @ $7.95 25.72T 3" @ $7.45 242.38T 3" @ $7.45

137514

CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY M BABCOCK S/T TWP SFRONTENAC

Total EFT000000005719 EFT000000005720 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005720 EFT000000005724 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005724 EFT000000005728 7/5/2016

GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC RE & RE TARP

7203 7203

JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL

KAL TIRE ONTARIO 847114058-BALANCE INVOICE SHORT PAID 847115827 BRAKE REPAIRS

Total EFT000000005735 EFT000000005737 7/5/2016 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 146-134568 Total EFT000000005737 EFT000000005738 7/5/2016

$481.86 $195.30 $195.00 $1,837.54 $6,519.30 $610.56 $610.56

KROWN RUST CONTROL RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY RUST CONTROL SPRAY

$204.40 $204.41 $408.81 $353.76 $353.76 $122.11 $122.11 $244.22 $814.26 $1,439.59 $2,253.85 $213.70 $213.70 $213.70 $152.64 $127.14 $127.14 $152.64 $213.70 $137.38 $127.15 $213.70 $213.70 $213.70 $2,319.99

LEONARD FUELS 1057-710290 1058-710224 1058-711138 1058-711649 1058-711847 1058-713474 1058-714637

110.0L @ $.9726 84.76L @ $.9726 91.02L @ $.9637 66.12L @ $.9637 87.0L @ $.9372 100.31L @ $.9372 65.70L @ $.9372

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/06/24-47 4 CLEANS @ $75 16/06/17-HOME DEPOT CLEANING SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005739 EFT000000005743 7/5/2016 DA0005516109 Total EFT000000005743 EFT000000005750 7/5/2016

SERVICE A/C UNITS SERVICE A/C UNITS

37655 Total EFT000000005728 EFT000000005734 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005738 EFT000000005739 7/5/2016

6

EVERTEMP INC 29064 29064

Total EFT000000005734 EFT000000005735 7/5/2016

Page:

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA CANADA INC 1 TIRE

R&D NELSON GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15/06 BEDFORD 6 HRS @ $18.00 15/06 BEDFORD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 15/06 PORTLAND 9 HRS @ $18

Total EFT000000005750 EFT000000005755 7/5/2016 10744

R. THURSTON TECHNOLOGIES REPAIR TWO-WAY RADIO

32204687

RUSSEL METALS INC HOT ROLL STRUCTURAL ANGLE

S-0045187 S-0044990 S-0044990 S-0045035

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 1589.58T 5/8" @ $13.95 2792.952T 5/8" @ $13.95 2158.74T 3" @ $13.40 496.93T 5/8" @ $8.75

Total EFT000000005755 EFT000000005756 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005756 EFT000000005763 7/5/2016

$106.63 $82.14 $87.41 $63.50 $81.20 $93.62 $61.32 $575.82 $300.00 $31.48 $331.48 $820.95 $820.95 $109.90 $53.29 $215.80 $378.99 $86.50 $86.50 $162.82 $162.82 $22,564.92 $39,644.11 $29,436.24 $4,424.67

Page 153 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT S-0044966 S-0045036 S-0045188

Total EFT000000005763 EFT000000005765 7/5/2016 429389 429295 Total EFT000000005765 EFT000000005766 7/5/2016

24.14T 5/8" @ $8.75 128.56T 5/8" @ $7.75 58.54T 5/8" @ $8.75 TALLMAN TRUCK CENTRE LIMITED ALTERNATOR & 3 BATTERIES SAFETY/REPAIRS

Page:

7 $214.95 $1,013.87 $521.25 $97,820.01 $1,318.69 $3,848.36 $5,167.05

TEM ROADWORK 282456 282456

Total EFT000000005766 EFT000000005768 7/5/2016

51.5 HRS H/T PATCHING @ $80 51.5 HRS FLAGGING @ $20

5821 5821 9759 9759

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND WATER, CREAM WATER FILTERS COFFEE, SUGAR, CREAM

60519 60314 60537 59724 60334 202695

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE BYPASS LOPPER, SHOP TOWELS 5 TARPS FAN RAKE CAR FRESHENERS, BATTERIES PAINT SUPPLIES FLAG

173-118213 896-759125 173-120256 896-755344

UNIVERSAL SUPPLY GROUP ANTENNA OIL ABSORBANT STROBE TUBE DRIVE BELT

33974

VERONA HARDWARE LIMITED BROOM & SHOVEL

2949 2957

WILLIAMS HOT MIX LTD 45.09T SAND SEAL @ $97 51.59T SAND SEAL @ $97

Total EFT000000005768 EFT000000005769 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005769 EFT000000005774 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005774 EFT000000005777 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005777 EFT000000005778 7/5/2016

$4,192.51 $1,048.13 $5,240.64 $27.64 $24.95 $3.04 $31.16 $86.79 $47.59 $114.93 $33.57 $21.14 $55.71 $15.03 $287.97 $21.39 $140.33 $39.68 $18.37 $219.77 $29.49 $29.49

Total EFT000000005778

$4,450.70 $5,092.30 $9,543.00

Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl

$430,581.76

3215 Drainage Cheque EFT000000005730

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 5982

Vendor

Description

G WILLIAMS PAVING LTD ROAD REPAIRS

Total EFT000000005730

Total Drainage

Amount $2,900.16 $2,900.16

$2,900.16

3310 Hardtop Patching Cheque EFT000000005778

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 2962 2957 2957

Vendor

Description

WILLIAMS HOT MIX LTD 3.05T SAND SEAL @ $97 2.21T SAND SEAL @ $97 6.68T SAND SEAL @ $97

Total EFT000000005778

Total Hardtop Patching

Amount $301.06 $218.14 $659.35 $1,178.55

$1,178.55

3415 dust layer Cheque EFT000000005738

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

LEONARD FUELS 1058-710039

Total EFT000000005738 EFT000000005744 7/5/2016 16-527 16-468 16-468

16.22L @ $1.1140 MORRIS CHEMICALS INCORPORATED 39,977.89L CALCIUM @ $.2094 17141.86L CALCIUM @ $.2251 19988.95L CALCIUM @ $.2094

$18.39 $18.39 $8,518.71 $3,926.54 $4,259.36

Page 154 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 16-502 16-588 16-633

Total EFT000000005744 EFT000000005763 7/5/2016 S-0044971

19870.32L CALCIUM @ $.2094 19937.05L CALCIUM @ $.2094 10046.37L CALCIUM @ $.2251 SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 29 HRS WATER TRK @ $92.50

Total EFT000000005763

Total dust layer

Page:

8 $4,234.08 $4,248.30 $2,301.24 $27,488.23 $2,729.71 $2,729.71

$30,236.33

3425 Gradng & Grvl resurf Cheque 067613 Total 067613 EFT000000005763

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

036

GILBERT & SON CONSTRUCTION INC. 5 HRS GRADER RENTAL @ $100

S-0045182

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 23.60T 5.8" @ $7.75

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005763

Total Gradng & Grvl resurf

Amount $508.80 $508.80 $186.12 $186.12

$694.92

3601 Barricds & Sfty Matls Cheque 067597

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 047732

Vendor

Description

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE SHIELD

Total 067597

Total Barricds & Sfty Matls

Amount $38.65 $38.65

$38.65

3615 Street signs Cheque 067629

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06/14-06

Total 067629 EFT000000005759

Description

7/5/2016

SIGN INSTALLATION

$1,336.75 $1,336.75

1 - 36’ STREET SIGN

$42.68 $42.68

SIGNS PLUS 2939

Total EFT000000005759

Total Street signs

$1,379.43

3635 Trffc cnts Cheque EFT000000005769

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE FUSES

Amount

Total EFT000000005769

$4.77 $4.77

Total Trffc cnts

$4.77

60386

3650 Street Lights Cheque EFT000000005770

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

TRUE ELECTRIC

Total EFT000000005770

$2,522.68 $1,073.57 $3,596.25

Total Street Lights

$3,596.25

6717 6715

NEW LIGHT & POLE BELLROCK/PARK STRAIGHTEN LIGHTS

3800 Crssng Guards Cheque EFT000000005697

Date

Inv #

6/30/2016

Description

16/06 16/06

KEHOE, GENNY LYNN 18 DAYS @ $30 16/06 KEHOE WSIB

16/06 16/06

MACINTYRE, DOUG 3 DAYS @ $30.00 16/06 WSIB MACINTYRE CROSSING

Total EFT000000005697 EFT000000005699 6/30/2016

Total EFT000000005699 EFT000000005700 6/30/2016

Vendor

Amount $540.00 $15.55 $555.55 $90.00 $2.59 $92.59

SNIDER, DEBBIE

Page 155 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 16/06 16/06

21 DAYS @ $45.00 16/06 SNIDER WSIB

Total EFT000000005700

Total Crssng Guards

Page:

9 $945.00 $27.22 $972.22

$1,620.36

Total Trans

$469,356.74

40 Env 4110 Water Treat Cheque EFT000000005775

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

UTILITIES KINGSTON MAY OPERATING COSTS

Amount

Total EFT000000005775

$9,899.82 $9,899.82

Total Water Treat

$9,899.82

31903

5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque EFT000000005749

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

PUROLATOR INC.

Total EFT000000005749

$30.28 $30.28

Total SW & Fac OH

$30.28

431607903

COURIER

5105 Garb coll Cheque 067590

Total 067590 067616 Total 067616 EFT000000005695

Date

Inv #

6/30/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06 16/06

16/06 COLLECTION 16/06 COLLECTION

2016112

KINGSTON TRANSMISSION SERVICES INC TRANSMISSION CONTROL MODULE

16/06

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/06 COLLECTION

22581

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 6 HRS @ $65

7/5/2016

6/30/2016

Total EFT000000005695 EFT000000005702 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005702

Total Garb coll

$11,274.39 $9,306.49 $20,580.88 $1,042.70 $1,042.70 $11,517.09 $11,517.09 $396.86 $396.86

$33,537.53

5110 Gab disp Cheque 067629

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

6/30/2016

17 HRS DOZER @ $80 8 HRS DOZER @ $80 4 LOADS GARBAGE

WHALEY, GEORGE 16/06 DISPOSAL 16/06 DISPOSAL

Total EFT000000005701 EFT000000005703 7/5/2016 07360258

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL

1459

CONTAINERS R US 2-20’L X 8’W X 8.6"H CONTAINER

7257 7368 7368 7368 7368

JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL

Total EFT000000005703 EFT000000005715 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005715 EFT000000005734 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005734 EFT000000005748 7/5/2016

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06/08-01 16/06/16-04 16/06/16-07

Total 067629 EFT000000005701

Vendor

PROGRESSIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS CAN INC 647-0000021870 20.01T GARBAGE

$1,383.94 $651.26 $712.32 $2,747.52 $1,935.80 $1,935.80 $97.44 $97.44 $4,477.44 $4,477.44 $117.02 $117.02 $117.02 $117.02 $117.02 $585.10 $1,720.63

Page 156 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total EFT000000005748 EFT000000005767 7/5/2016

Page:

10 $1,720.63

979

TOMLINSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LANDFILL GRINDING

Total EFT000000005767

Total Gab disp

$20,025.60 $20,025.60

$31,589.53

5200 Recyc Cheque 067597

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 047362

Total 067597 EFT000000005759

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE SAW BLADES, PINE BOARDS

Amount $145.00 $145.00

SIGNS PLUS 2937

4 RECYCLE STATION SIGNS

Total EFT000000005759

Total Recyc

$37.32 $37.32

$182.32

5205 Recyc Coll Cheque 067590

Total 067590 EFT000000005695

Date

Inv #

6/30/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06 16/06 16/06

16/06 COLLECTION 16/06 COLLECTION 16/06 COLLECTION

16/06

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/05 COLLECTION

6/30/2016

Total EFT000000005695

Total Recyc Coll

$12,162.26 $10,605.36 $11,320.42 $34,088.04 $9,907.17 $9,907.17

$43,995.21

5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 067629

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/06/08-08

1 LOAD CON - GREEN BAY

Total 067629

Total Rec Disp/Prc

$330.72 $330.72

$330.72

5305 HHW Cheque EFT000000005710

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 20160082 20160082

Vendor

Description

BRENDAR ENVIRONMENTAL INC. HHW DEPOT 4 DAYS @ $400 MANIFESTS

Total EFT000000005710

Total HHW

Amount $1,628.16 $4,727.77 $6,355.93

$6,355.93

5320 Cheque 067625

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 35501419

Vendor

Description

ORBIS CANADA LIMITED 50 COMPOSTERS @ $35

Total 067625

Total

Amount $1,780.80 $1,780.80

$1,780.80

Total Env

$127,702.14

70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque 067622

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

7/5/2016 3321

Total 067628 EFT000000005696

6/30/2016

Description

Amount

NOONAN, MIKE 16/06/30-46

Total 067622 067628

Vendor

JUNE MOWING SHAW’S LANDSCAPING MAY GRASS CUTTING D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS

$309.62 $309.62 $339.19 $339.19

Page 157 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 16/06

16/06 SERVICES

Total EFT000000005696

Page:

11 $875.14 $875.14

Total Health

$1,523.95

Total Cem

$1,523.95

80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067592

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 113402

Total 067592 067606 Total 067606 067611 Total 067611 067612

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

Total 067614 067615

Total 067615 067617

7/5/2016

$800.00 $800.00

FISHER, DAVE 16/06/27 - S REC

16/06/27 - S REC

$30.30 $30.30

Total 067619 067622

FRONTENAC DOCKS 8 X 20’ CEDAR DOCK

HOLLAND, TRACY 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 6.2 KMS @ $.55 HOWE, MIKE 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

MOREY, PAM 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

Total 067633 EFT000000005698

7/5/2016

JUNE MOWING

$592.12 $592.12

8 HRS TRIAXLE @ $80 UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC MODULAR FENCE MODULAR FENCE

16/06

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/06 MAINTENANCE

3013 3028

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE CORN BROOM SAW BLADE, BOLTS

Total EFT000000005698 EFT000000005707 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005711

$3,728.01 $3,728.01 $30.30 $5.25 $35.55

133270344-008 134288524-006 6/30/2016

Total EFT000000005708 EFT000000005711 7/5/2016

$30.30 $4.96 $35.26

$508.80 $169.61 $93.29 $169.61 $169.61 $1,110.92

SNIDER, PERCY

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005707 EFT000000005708 7/5/2016

$30.30 $3.07 $33.37

16/06/20 - SF REC 10.6 KMS @ $.55

SHAW’S LANDSCAPING MAY GRASS CUTTING MAY GRASS CUTTING MAY GRASS CUTTING MAY GRASS CUTTING MAY GRASS CUTTING

16/06/15-50 Total 067629 067633

$7,764.29 $7,764.29

NOONAN, MIKE

3331 3322 3334 3333 3332 Total 067628 067629

16/06/20 - SF REC 10 KMS @ $.55

LOYALIST IRRIGATION LIMITED INSTALL PUMP SYSTEM

16/06/30-46 Total 067622 067628

$368.13 $368.13

PROVIDE CYCLING EDUCATION

2837 Total 067617 067619

ACME SPORT & PROMOTIONS T-SHIRTS

Amount

CYCLE KINGSTON

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

Description

SFR-2016-1

1630 Total 067612 067614

Vendor

BELL, DAN 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC

16/06/20 - SF REC 15 KMS @ $.55

CAMPBELL, ANNIE 16/06/27 - S REC 16/06/27 - S REC

$651.26 $651.26 $81.41 $915.84 $997.25 $142.50 $142.50 $9.15 $18.42 $27.57 $30.30 $7.43 $37.73 $30.30 $30.30

Page 158 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005723

12:58:29 PM

7/5/2016

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT ERLICHMAN, WOLFE 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 75 KMS @ $.55

Total EFT000000005723 EFT000000005724 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005724 EFT000000005725 7/5/2016

CONDENSATE PUMP HVAC REPAIRS SPRING MAINTENANCE SERVICE A/C UNIT SPRING MAINTENANCE

FOX, KEVIN 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/27 - S REC

16/06/20 - SF REC 64 KMS @ $.55 16/06/27 - S REC

7256 7255 7254 7253

16/06/06-RAMP

78176

Total EFT000000005750 EFT000000005753 7/5/2016

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD INVOICE SHORT $100

PRINTFUSION INC. BANNER-MUSEUM

R&D NELSON GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15/05-15/06 LIBRARY MAY - 36 HRS @ $15.00 15/05-15/06 LIBRARY JUNE - 36 HRS @ $15.00 15/05-15/06 LIBRARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 15/05 15/06 GLENDWR MAY/JUNE 20 HRS @ $18 15/05 15/06 GLENDWR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ROLLINS, ELLWOOD 16/06/27 - S REC 16/06/27 - S REC

Total EFT000000005753 EFT000000005758 7/5/2016 1500545 Total EFT000000005758 EFT000000005759 7/5/2016

SHEA CONSTRUCTION DEMO/REMOVAL PLAY STRUCTURE

Total EFT000000005759 EFT000000005760 7/5/2016

$98.77 $220.29 $373.64 $224.62 $311.24 $1,228.56 $30.30 $31.70 $30.30 $92.30 $117.02 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $422.30 $30.30 $30.30 $90.06 $90.06 $65.00 $65.00 $145.52 $145.52 $549.50 $549.50 $163.12 $366.34 $134.91 $1,763.37 $30.30 $30.30 $3,056.87 $3,056.87

BYLAW SIGN W/GRAFFITI NO DIVING SIGNS “POINT SHORELINE CLOSED” 2 SIGNS SIGN SIGN

$187.91 $211.66 $51.90 $116.01 $58.00 $58.00 $683.48

4 CLEANS @ $70 4 WKS BOOKING @ $10 2 HRS @ $15

$280.00 $40.00 $30.00 $350.00

SLEETH, SARAH 16/06/24-08 16/06/24-08 16/06/24-08

SMITH, ROBERTA 16/06/27 - S REC 16/06/27 - S REC

Total EFT000000005761 EFT000000005762 7/5/2016 11704459

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. INSPECTION 1000 GAL TANK

K548428 K548428

SWISH MAINTENANCE LIMITED ROLL TOWEL ROLL TOWEL

Total EFT000000005762 EFT000000005764 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005764

$30.30 $37.14 $67.44

SIGNS PLUS 2940 2942 2941 2941 2941 2941

Total EFT000000005760 EFT000000005761 7/5/2016

16/06/27 - S REC

PANTREY, AMANDA 16/06/27 - S REC SEC 16/06/27 - S REC SECRETARY

Total EFT000000005745 EFT000000005747 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005747 EFT000000005750 7/5/2016

JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL

KOT, JOHN 16/06/27 - S REC

Total EFT000000005736 EFT000000005742 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005742 EFT000000005745 7/5/2016

12

EVERTEMP INC 29026 29025 29067 29065 29068

Total EFT000000005725 EFT000000005734 7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005734 EFT000000005736 7/5/2016

Page:

$30.30 $30.30 $224.21 $224.21 $98.55 $40.29 $138.84

Page 159 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005769

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

7/5/2016 59425 60635 60586 202631 60608 60581 60373 60758 60756 60638 60528 60426 202695 202695 60776 202874 60647

Total EFT000000005769 EFT000000005770 7/5/2016

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 2 - 2 X 6 X 14’ SIENNA 2 - 2 X 10 X 12’ SIENNA 35 SIENNA 1 - 2 X 6 X 8’ SIENNA CHAIN,BOLTS,WASHERS,CEMENT QUICK LINKS PINES BOARDS, BOLTS, WASHERS RUST PAINT, CUTTERS LED LAMPS PAINT SUPPLIES DUCT TAPE, FASTENERS MOSQUITO REPELLANT 2 FLAGS FLAG SCREW LAG EYE 3 2 X 8 X 10’ SIENNA LINE MARKING POWDER

Total EFT000000005776 EFT000000005779 7/5/2016

13

$10.23 $47.60 $653.96 $8.13 $409.25 $8.92 $42.34 $35.07 $19.32 $55.76 $24.10 $20.34 $30.06 $15.03 $2.53 $46.16 $86.44 $1,515.24

TRUE ELECTRIC 6714

Total EFT000000005770 EFT000000005776 7/5/2016

Page:

POWER SUPPLY FOR WATER PUMP

VANDEWAL, SARAH 16/06/20 - SF REC SE 16/06/20 - SF REC SECRETARY 16/06/20 - SF REC SE 7.8 KMS @ $.55 WOOD, ALVIN 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/20 - SF REC 16/06/27 - S REC

16/06/20 - SF REC 44 KMS @ $.55 16/06/27 - S REC

Total EFT000000005779

Total Rec

$4,763.39 $4,763.39 $65.00 $3.87 $68.87 $30.30 $21.80 $30.30 $82.40

$31,233.31

8020 Swim Cheque 067596

Total 067596 EFT000000005712

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Vendor

Description

235922 235922 235922

AQUAM SPECIALISTE AQUATIQUE INC. SWIM PROGRAM SUPPLIES SWIM PROGRAM SUPPLIES SWIM PROGRAM SUPPLIES

IN00330104 IN00330104 IN00330104

CANADIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY SWIM BADGES, PROGRESS CARDS SWIM BADGES, PROGRESS CARDS SWIM BADGES, PROGRESS CARDS

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005712

Total Swim

Amount $401.96 $159.51 $76.56 $638.03 $313.42 $235.07 $235.07 $783.56

$1,421.59

8025 Day Cmps Cheque 067637

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

DARKE, DEBORAH DCSGE-REFUND DCSG3 - REFUND OVERPAYMENT

Total 067637

Total Day Cmps

Amount $23.00 $23.00

$23.00

8030 Cda Day Cheque 067595 Total 067595 067607 Total 067607 067609

Date 7/5/2016

7/5/2016

Inv #

Description

A PARTY CENTRE CONTRACT 52052 BAL TENT & CHAIRS ELLIOTT, HANNAH 2016 CANDAY POSTER CANADA DAY POSTER

7/5/2016

Amount $124.66 $124.66 $45.00 $45.00

ESKEROD SIGNS 27186

Total 067609 067610

Vendor

7/5/2016 29355

NEW BANNER - CANADA DAY FIREWORKS FX INC LITE-ROPE TRI-COLOUR

$311.39 $311.39

Page 160$119.04 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 29387 29385 29386

Total 067610 067620 Total 067620 EFT000000005779

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

CUSTOM FIREWORKS DISPLAY CUSTOM FIREWORKS DISPLAY CUSTOM FIREWORKS DISPLAY

MURPHY, RHIANNON 2016 CANDAY POSTER CANADA DAY POSTER WOOD, ALVIN 2016-FACE PAINTING

FACE PAINTING SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005779

Total Cda Day

Page:

14 $6,303.72 $5,088.00 $9,158.40 $20,669.16 $45.00 $45.00 $114.92 $114.92

$21,310.13

8210 VCA Cheque 067597

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 049164 - VCA 049476

Total 067597 067598

7/5/2016

Vendor

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE 2 - 6X6X14 MICRO PRO SIENNA PARTS FOR ELECTRONIC SIGN

Total 067599 067603

Total 067603 067627

7/5/2016

CASH ADVANCE VCA ADMIN

REPLACEMENT BARRELS-CONTEST CASH FOR MUSIC IN THE PARK

2016023 2016023 2016020

COLEMAN, DONALD SHUTTLE BUS DRIVER CASH ADVANCE - ADMINISTRATION TEA & COFFEE FOR MEETING

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

7/5/2016

RENTAL OF STORAGE SPACE UTG DIGITAL MEDIA DEPOSIT FOR ELECTRONIC SIGN

$255.29 $900.00 $1,155.29 $100.00 $450.27 $20.54 $570.81 $200.00 $200.00 $15,055.20 $15,055.20

VELEY, LARRY 2016022

Total 067635 EFT000000005716

$90.06 $90.06

REYNOLDS, LEITA

INV-104 Total 067634 067635

$106.54 $7.63 $114.17

BATES, LINDA 2016019 2016029

2016021 Total 067627 067634

Amount

BATES, DON 2016026

Total 067598 067599

Description

7/5/2016

RENTAL OF FIELDS FOR PARKING

$300.00 $300.00

LUNCH FOR SETUP VOLUNTEERS FOOD FOR DINNERS

$56.87 $152.09 $208.96

CONWAY, WAYNE 2016025 2016030

Total EFT000000005716

Total VCA

$17,694.49

8220 VMC Cheque EFT000000005741

Date 7/5/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

MCDOUGALL, JOHN 2016016-WHIG AD DEMPSEY RETIREMENT AD

Total EFT000000005741

Amount $122.11 $122.11

Total VMC

$122.11

Total Rec

$71,804.63

90 Plan 9000 Plan Cheque 067592 Total 067592 EFT000000005768

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016

Description

113402

ACME SPORT & PROMOTIONS T- SHIRTS

374 8108

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND CREAM DRINKS FOR CHINESE PLANNERS

7/5/2016

Total EFT000000005768

Vendor

Amount $37.22 $37.22 $5.38 $14.36 $19.74

Page 161 of 189

System:

6/30/2016

User ID:

srummell

12:58:29 PM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

15

Total Plan

$56.96

Total Plan

$56.96

99 9999 Cheque EFT000000005714

Date

Inv #

7/5/2016 196737

Total EFT000000005714 EFT000000005731 7/5/2016 Total EFT000000005731

Vendor

Description

COLLINS SAFETY INC. J BRASH BOOT ALLOWANCE

HARBISON, BRIAN 6 4 12700 REFUND 6 4 12700 REFUND

Amount $205.67 $205.67 $135.92 $135.92

Total

$341.59

Total

$341.59

Total

$2,282,478.60

Page 162 of 189

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

June 27, 2016

Agenda Date:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Annual Repayment Limit in respect to long-term debt and financial obligations RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. BACKGROUND: On a yearly basis, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing reports on the Township’s Annual Repayment Limit (ARL) in respect to long-term debt and financial obligations. The ARL is based on 25% of the Township’s net own source revenues reported in the Financial Information Return (FIR). As per our reserve policy, the Township’s preference for funding capital projects is to save for large projects to avoid debt financing where practical. ANALYSIS: For the year 2016, the Township’s ARL is $4,708,242. This is based on 25% of the net own source revenues reported in our 2014 FIR. As an example, borrowing at a rate of 5%, the ARL would allow the Township to undertake long-term borrowing over 20 years in the amount of $58,675,096. In 2015, the Township’s ARL was $4,182,869. Using the similar example of borrowing at a rate of 5% over 20 years, this ARL would have allowed to undertake borrowing of $52,127,796. Attachment: MMAH 2016 Annual Repayment Limit

Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Page 163 of 189

Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing

Ministère des affaires municipales et du logement

777 Bay Street,

777 rue Bay,

Toronto, Ontario M5G 2E5

Toronto (Ontario) M5G 2E5

2016 ANNUAL REPAYMENT LIMIT (UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 403 / 02)

MMAH CODE:

46619

MUNID:

10013

MUNICIPALITY:

South Frontenac Tp

UPPER TIER:

Frontenac Co

FIR CLEAN FLAG:

REPAYMENT LIMIT:

F

$

4,708,242

The repayment limit has been calculated based on data contained in the 2014 Financial Information Return, as submitted to the Ministry. This limit represents the maximum amount which the municipality had available as of December 31, 2014 to commit to payments relating to debt and financial obligation. Prior to the authorization by Council of a long term debt or financial obligation, this limit must be adjusted by the Treasurer in the prescribed manner. The limit is effective January 01, 2016.

FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY, The additional long-term borrowing which a municipality could undertake over a 5-year, a 10-year, a 15-year and a 20-year period is shown. If the municipalities could borrow at 5% or 7% annually, the annual repayment limits shown above would allow it to undertake additional long-term borrowing as follows:

Page: 01 of 02

(a) (a) (a) (a)

5% Interest Rate 20 years @ 5% p.a. 15 years @ 5% p.a. 10 years @ 5% p.a. 5 years @ 5% p.a.

$ $ $ $

58,675,096 48,869,937 36,355,793 20,384,222

(a) (a) (a) (a)

7% Interest Rate 20 years @ 7% p.a. 15 years @ 7% p.a. 10 years @ 7% p.a. 5 years @ 7% p.a.

$ $ $ $

49,879,178 42,882,259 33,068,718 19,304,720

Date Prepared:

30-May-16

Page 164 of 189

DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL DEBT REPAYMENT LIMIT (UNDER ONTARIO REGULATION 403/02) MUNICIPALITY:

South Frontenac Tp

MMAH CODE:

46619 1 $

Debt Charges for the Current Year 0210 0220 0299

Principal (SLC 74 3099 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17,307 . . . . . . . . . . . Interest (SLC 74 3099 02). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,689 . . . . . . . . . . . 37,996 Subtotal

0610

Payments for Long Term Commitments and Liabilities financed from the consolidated statement of operations (SLC 42 6010 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . . . . .

Total Debt Charges

9910

37,996 1 $

Amounts Recovered from Unconsolidated Entities 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1099

Electricity - Principal (SLC 74 3030 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . Electricity - Interest (SLC 74 3030 02) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . . . . . Gas - Principal (SLC 74 3040 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . Gas - Interest (SLC 74 3040 02) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . . . . . Telephone - Principal (SLC 74 3050 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . Telephone - Interest (SLC 74 3050 02) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . . . . . 0 Subtotal

1410

Debt Charges for Tile Drainage/Shoreline Assistance (SLC 74 3015 01 + SLC 74 3015 02) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 . . . . . . . . . .

1411

Provincial Grant funding for repayment of long term debt (SLC 74 3120 01 + SLC 74 3120 02). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 . . . . . . . .

1412

Lump sum (balloon) repayments of long term debt (SLC 74 3110 01 + SLC 74 3110 02). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . .

1420

Total Debt Charges to be Excluded

2,065

9920

Net Debt Charges

35,931

1610

Total Revenues (Sale of Hydro Utilities Removed) (SLC 10 9910 01). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 $ 24,112,225

Excluded Revenue Amounts 2010

Fees for Tile Drainage / Shoreline Assistance (SLC 12 1850 04) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 . . . . . . . . . .

2210 2220 2225 2226 2230 2240 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2299

Ontario Grants, including Grants for Tangible Capital Assets (SLC 10 0699 01 + SLC 10 0810 01 + SLC10 0815 01) . . . . . . . . 1,729,343 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada Grants, including Grants for Tangible Capital Assets (SLC 10 0820 01 + SLC 10 0825 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue earned (Provincial Gas Tax) (SLC 10 830 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 Deferred revenue earned (Canada Gas Tax) (SLC 10 831 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,336,140 Revenue from other municipalities including revenue for Tangible Capital Assets ( SLC 10 1098 01 + SLC 10 1099 01) . . . . . . . 842,683 . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain/Loss on sale of land & capital assets (SLC 10 1811 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,060 . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue earned (Development Charges) (SLC 10 1812 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211,431 . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue earned (Recreation Land (The Planning Act)) (SLC 10 1813 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167,426 . . . . . . . . . . . . Donated Tangible Capital Assets (SLC 53 0610 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . Other Deferred revenue earned (SLC 10 1814 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814,121 . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase / Decrease in Government Business Enterprise equity (SLC 10 1905 01) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . . 5,135,204 Subtotal

2410

Fees and Revenue for Joint Local Boards for Homes for the Aged . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. . . . . . . . .

2610

Net Revenues

18,976,690

2620

25% of Net Revenues

4,744,173

9930

ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPAYMENT LIMIT

4,708,242

(25% of Net Revenues less Net Debt Charges)

• SLC denotes Schedule, Line Column.

Page: 02 of 02

Date Prepared:

30-May-16

Page 165 of 189

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

June 28, 2016

Agenda Date:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: Changes to Development Charges reporting requirements RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. BACKGROUND: Bill 73 (Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015) amendments to the Development Charges Act (DCA), 1997 came into force on January 1, 2016. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) states that the legislation aims to “help municipalities recover more costs for growth-related infrastructure and enhance transparency and accountability”. The recent changes incorporate several new requirements including additional reporting to Council in relation to the year-end development charges reserve. Currently, the year-end reserve schedule provides opening, closing and transactions related to the fund but it is now required that the statement identify all assets whose capital costs were funded under a development charge by-law during the year and how the remainder of the asset was funded. This statement also needs to be made available to the public. ANALYSIS: Below is s a summary of the information initially provided on the development charges reserve with the year-end financial statements:

CONTRIBUTION FROM

2015

BALANCE AT

CONTRIBUTION TO

BEGINNING OF YEAR

Development Charges

1,837,969.61

BALANCE AT END

DEVELOPERS

INTEREST

330,737.20 23,469.22

CAPITAL FUND

OF YEAR

200,000.00 1,992,176.03

To meet the new requirements, the reporting will be changed to the format attached. Further, a breakdown of the specific functions within the reserve is also being provided. Attachment: Development charges reporting – new format Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Page 166 of 189

SOUTH FRONTENAC TOWNSHIP DECEMBER 31 2015

Development Charge Reserve Fund allocated per provisions of former & current by-laws BALANCE AT

New By-Law

Commercial & Industrial

BEGINNING

Developer Contributions

Developer Contributions

OF YEAR

General Government Fire Services Recreation Landfill Public Works-Roads, Bridges and Equipment Library Police Sub-total

%

Interest

%

88.33 247,446.42 185,790.16 6,283.14

2.160% 8.100% 1.400%

6,797.89 25,492.09 4,406.04

2.28% 8.810%

365.26 1,411.36

7,251.48 274,349.87 190,196.20 6,283.14

78.47 2,968.95 2,058.26 67.99

1,304,445.92 49,611.79 44,303.85 1,837,969.61

82.020% 0.780% 5.540% 100.000%

258,131.05 2,454.79 17,435.34 314,717.20

83.550%

13,384.71

5.360% 100.000%

858.67 16,020.00

1,575,961.68 52,066.58 62,597.86 2,168,706.81

17,054.68 563.45 677.42 23,469.22

Breakdown of asset(s) funded from Development Charges

Yarker Road

Transfers Subtotal

Project Cost 1,303,311

Development Charges 200,000

County FGT 455,252

OCIF Grant 109,279

Taxation 538,780

BALANCE AT

to Revenue &

END

Capital Fund

OF YEAR

7,329.95 277,318.82 192,254.46 6,351.13 -200,000.00

-200,000.00

1,393,016.36 52,630.03 63,275.28 1,992,176.03

Page 167 of 189

STAFF REPORT TREASURY DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

June 28, 2016

Agenda Date:

July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: 2016 student funding RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only. BACKGROUND: In prior years, student funding could be applied through various organizations such as KEYS, Rural Summer Jobs and Canada Summer Jobs. For 2016, these programs were all amalgamated into the Canada Summer Jobs with a new assessment system. As with every other year, the Township applied including all summer student positions within the Township. An amount of $16,600 was budget for 2016 which is broken down as follows: Public Works Facilities & SW Swim/Day Camps Treasury Total

$4,500 3,600 7,500 1,000 16,600

In late May, we were advised by Canada Summer Jobs that we were unsuccessful in receiving any funding. In talking to other area municipalities, many who had previously received funding also did not receive funding or received a significant reduction in funding. We did apply for funding through the Ontario Summer Experience program and were successful in receiving funding in the amount of $2,875. This was unbudgeted and will help to offset the funding shortfall under Recreation. The funding shortfall was discussed with the affected managers and for all areas, the shortfall will be compensated within their department throughout various budget lines. Submitted/approved by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Prepared by: Louise Fragnito, Treasurer

Page 168 of 189

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 28, 2016

AGENDA DATE: July 5, 2016

SUBJECT: PW-2016-23 Tender to replace Salmon Lake Road culvert RECOMMENDATION: For information only. BACKGROUND: A tender for the replacement of the Salmon Lake Road culvert was prepared and advertised on the Municipal website, on Biddingo, and in the local newspaper. This tender closed on June 22nd, 2016. The results, in ascending order, were as follows: Supplier

Price (Excl. HST)

Crain’s Construction Ltd. Whites Landscaping and Excavating AECON K. Mulrooney Trucking Titanium Contracting Inc. H.R. Doornekamp Cruickshank Construction Ltd.

$331,969.00 $396,918.00 $438,924.08 $499,904.50 $529,840.70 $540,108.30 $700,000.00

The submission of the low bidder has been evaluated and was found to be accurate and complete. Crain’s Construction Ltd. is a reputable contractor with many years of experience in construction including culvert replacement. For these reasons, and also because their price was $64,949.00 lower than the bid from Whites Landscaping and Excavating, the Public Works Department, under delegated authority, has awarded the tender to Crains Construction Ltd., for $375,124.97 including HST. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: An Amount of $750,000.00 was approved in the 2016 Capital Budget for the design and replacement of the Salmon Lake culvert.

Submitted/approved by:

Prepared By:

Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

David Holliday, CET Area Supervisor

Page 169 of 189

^ sue?^

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC P.O. Box 100

^w

4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario, KOH 2TO

Telephone 376-3027 /1-800-559-5862 FAX (613) 376-6657 E-mail :worr@southfrontenac.net

June 23, 2016 Honourable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada House of Commons

Ottawa, Ontario K1AOA6 Dear Prime Minister: Re: Re-Establishment of Prison Farms

At their meeting held June 21, 2016, the Council of the Township of South Frontenac approved the following resolution: “That Council supports the re-establishment of the Prison Farm Program and that Carried.” this be communicated to the applicable parties The Pen Farm Herd Co-op, long-time supporters of a federal prison farm program in Kingston, are looking to see the program re-established. It is our understanding that your government has made a commitment to reopen the

operation. The Co-op has developed a business plan that has already received preliminary approval from your government and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale is aware of the co-op’s work. We look forward to receiving updates on any action taken on this initiative. Yours sinc^fely rr

ChTefAdrtflnistrative Officer

c.c. Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety W0:am

Page 170 of 189

From: Promm, Carina [mailto:prommc@limestone.on.ca] Sent: June-07-16 9:04 AM To: Lindsay Mills; Jennie Kapusta Cc: Wayne Orr; Ron Vandewal Subject: Thank-you!

Dear Mr. Mills and Miss. Kapusta, I wanted to send you a heart-felt thanks for the taking the time out of your busy day last Wednesday to do a presentation to my grade 9 Geography class from Ernestown Secondary School. Your extensive knowledge and experience in planning tied in so perfectly with our curriculum. Being in the Counsel Chamber, and interacting with you both, really brought a very hands-on approach to learning that is hard create within the confines of a traditional classroom. The students have really been encouraged to think about further education in geography related fields like GIS, and urban planning. Here’s a few comments from the students: “It was very eye-opening and educational.” “The presentation was interesting and the representatives were very friendly.” “It was so nice that they took that time to spend with us.” The effort you put into our trip really opened their minds and brightened their day. With much gratitude, Carina Promm Secondary Teacher Ernestown Secondary School

Page 171 of 189

A6

6648 Road 506 P.O. Box 97, Plevna, Ontario KOH2M0 Tel: (613) 479-2231 or 1-800-234-3953, Fax: (613) 479-2352

www.northfrontenac.ca

May 27, 2016 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 5775 Yonge Street 16"‘ Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2E5 —

Attention: Hon. Dr. Eric Hoskins, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Dear Hon. Dr. Hoskins: Re: Requesting

Support With Regards to Responding

to Medical Calls

North Frontenac Fire Departments are responding to increasing medical calls due to ambulances not being available or delayed. The Departments are experiencing continually rising costs of core services. Council feels that financial support should be provided by the province to support North Frontenac Fire Department when they are responding to medical calls.

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours. truly,

.

/

Ron Higgins Mayor, North Frontenac Councillor, County of Frontenac Phone (613) 884-9736 Email ron.higgins@xQlornet.com c.c. Premier of Ontario, the Office of the Fire Marshall, the Rural Mayors Forum of Eastern Ontario; and All Municipalities.

Page 172 of 189

Page 173 of 189

Page 174 of 189

Page 175 of 189

Page 176 of 189

Page 177 of 189

Page 178 of 189

Table 1 - Municipalities with No Property Standards By-Law Volume of Provincial InspectionsIRe-inspections over the Previous 3 Years No. 1 2

3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24

Page 179 of 189

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Munidpamy

Property

Standards

By-Law Coverage

inspections and Re- Inspections and Re- inspections and ReThree Year Average inspections 2013-14 inspections 2014-15’ inspections 2015-16

Addington Highlands Township Township Adjala«Tosorontio Algonquin Highlands Township Amaranth Township Armstrong Township

No-By Law

0

2

2

1.3

No-By Law No-By Law

2

O

0

0.7

O

1 0

0.3

0 O

0

0.0

Assiginack Township Athens Township Beckwith Township Brethour Township Brudenell, Lyndoch and Raglan Township Burpee and MillsTownship Calvin Township Carling Township Casey Township Casselman Village Central FrontenacTownship Chamberlain Township Chapple Township Charlton-Dack Municipality Chatsworth Township Clearview Township Cockburn island Township Conmee Township Dawson Township Drummond—North Elmsley Township Dubreuilville Township East Garafraxa Township Edwardsburgh-Cardinal Township Elizabethtown-Kitley Township EnniskillenTownship Evanturel Township Front of Yonge Township Frontenac Islands Township Gauthier Township

No»By Law

0 0 0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0.0 0.0

0 0

1 0

1

1

1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 O 0

0.7 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0

No-By Law No»By

Law

No-By Law

No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law NoBy Law NoBy Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law

0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0

0 O O 0 O 0 0 6 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0

0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table 1 - Municipalities with No Property Standards By-Law Volume of Provincial lnspectionslRe-inspections over the Previous 3 Years ‘

Propertystandards

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

43 44 45 46 47

48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

Page 180 of 189

58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68

GilliesTownship Gordon-Barrie Island Municipality Greater Madawaska Township Harley Township Harris Township Head, Clara and Maria Township Highlands East Municipality Hilliard Township Hilton Beach Village Hilton Township Hornepayne Township Hudson Township Huron Shores Municipality Jocelyn Township Joly Township Kerns Township Killarney Municipality La Vallee Township Lake of Bays Township Lake of The Woods Township Lanark Highlands Township Larder LakeTownship Latchford Town LimerickTownship Machin Township Madawaska Valley Township Manitouwaclge Township Markstay-Warren Municipality Mattawan Township McKe|lar Township McMurrich-Monteith Township Moonbeam Township Moosonee Town Morley Township

,

By-Law Coverage

‘5 glnspections’ andRe- _.lnspééiidnsiand Re- Inspections and,Re.,— l

g ;

,

_’

,

:mspections 2013-14 mspectrons

No-By Law

0

No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

No-By Law No~ByLaw No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

_.

I

_

Three Year Average

'

2014-15 -inspections 2015-16 V

0 0 2 O O 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0

1 V

( N

O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0

1 0 0

2

0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0

0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 O 0 O

,

Table 1 Municipalities with No Property Standards By-Law Volume of Provincial Inspections/Re-inspections over the Previous 3 Years

No’

69 70 71

72 73 74

75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84

85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93

I

Property Standards

Municipality

By-Law Coverage

Neebing Municipality Nipissing Township North Algona-Wilberforce Township North Frontenac Township O’Connor Township Opasatika Township Oro—Medonte Township Plummer Additional Township Ryerson Township

No-By Law

Stone MillsTownship

Tarbutt and Tarbutt Additional Township Tay Valley Township Terrace Bay Township The Archipelago Township

Whitestone Municipality

Total Inspections and Re-inspections Total Municipalities with Inspections

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

No-By Law No-By Law

Seguin Township Sioux Narrows-Nestor Falls Township South Algonquin Township South FrontenacTownship Springwater Township St.—CharlesMunicipality Stirling-Rawdon Township

Thornloe Village Tudor and Cashel Township Val Rita—HartyTownship

Inspections and Re- Inspections and Re- Inspections and Reinspections 2013-14 inspections 2014-15 inspections 2015-16

No-By Law No«By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No~By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law No-By Law

and Re«inspections

O O

0 0

O

O

0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 9 0 O

0

O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

O 0 0

1 0

0 1

1 0 3 0 0

18 11

22 11

Three Year Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

1 0 1 0

0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.0 1.3 0.0

0 O

0.0 0.0

O 0 O

0.0 0.0 0.0

1

35 15

25 12

Page 181 of 189

Table 2 - Municipalities with a Partial Property Standards By- Law (Exterior andlor Geographic Volume of Provincial InspectionsIRe-inspections over the Previous 3 Years ,

Municipality

No.

,.

1

2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28

Admaston—Brom|ey Township Alberton Township Billings Township Bradford—WestGwillimbury Town Brockton Municipality Central Elgin Municipality Centre Wellington Township Cobalt Town Coleman Township Deep River Town Dorion Township Municipality Emo Township Englehart Town Gore Bay Town Greenstone Municipality Grey Highlands Municipality Township Huron—Kinloss Ignace Township Kearney Town Killaloe,Hagarty and Richards Township Macdonald Meredith et al Township Machar Township Malahide Township Mapleton Township Markham City Mattice Val Cote Township McDougall Township

[Dutton—Dunwich

Page 182 of 189

29 30

McGarry Township

31

Mono Town

32 33

Mulmur Township Nairn and Hyman Township

Melancthon Township

Coverage)

and Re- inspections .Re_and Re-; ,.lns’pect‘ions Standards inspections Property and Three Year A rage ,

Coverage

Exterior Exterior Exterior

Geographic Geographic Geographic Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior Exterior Geographic Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior Exterior/Geographic Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior

inspections

2013-14

Inspections2014-15 Inspections

0

0 0 0 O O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 O 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0

2 0

O 0 0 0 O O

2015516 O 0

O 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 2 O 0 0

0 O

‘

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Table 2 - Municipalities with a Partial Property Standards By- Law (Exterior andlor Geographic Volume of Provincial InspectionsIRe-inspections over the Previous 3 Years

Coverage)

:::::::::::::::. ::::?“.c?:::::::.:3:::;’:::::

’;:?;:’§:::f:;:‘ 34

Papineau—Cameron Township

Exterior

0

35

Peneta nguishene Town

Exterior

0

36 37

Prince Edward County Prince Township Ramara Township Rideau Lakes Township Sables-Spanish Rivers Township Shuniah Municipality Municipality of South Dundas Southgate Township Southwold Township St. Joseph Township

Exterior

6 0

38 39 40 41

52 43 44 45 46

St. Marys Town

47

Tehkummah Township

48

The Blue Mountains Town

49 50

Tyendinaga Township Wellington North Township White River Township Zorra Township

51 52

Total Inspections

Exterior

Exterior Exterior

Exterior Exterior Geographic Exterior/Geographic

O

0.0

0

O

0.0

4

14 0

8.0

0

0 4 0 0 0

6 0 0 O 0

1

Exterior

0

Exterior

0

Exterior Exterior

3 0

0 O O 3 0

Exterior/Geographic Exterior

0

0

0 0

O O

Exterior

Exterior

0 0

Exterior

and Re-inspections

Total Municipalities with inspections

:::::::;

0

and Re-inspections

0.0 ’ 0.7

3 O

0.3 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0

0 0 0 O O

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0

0 0

y

0.0 2.7 1.3 0.0

2 0 0 0 2 0

19

16

25

20

7

5

6

6

Page 183 of 189

Page 184 of 189

Page 185 of 189

Page 186 of 189

Page 187 of 189

Page 188 of 189

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2016-44 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.

The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of July 5, 2016 be confirmed.

Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk-Administrator of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed.

This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 5th day of July, 2016. Read a first and second time this 5th day of July, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this 5th day of July, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Page 189 of 189

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.