Published October 16, 2019

Word Count 109763 words

Reading Time 516 min read

Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: October 16, 2019 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: Frontenac County

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/frontenac-county/Published Agendas/Regular Council/2019/Regular Council - 16 Oct 2019 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Frontenac County Council Meeting Wednesday, October 16, 2019 – 9:00 a.m. Kingston Frontenac Rotary Auditorium, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie Council will resolve into Closed Meeting and will reconvene as regular Council at 9:30 a.m.

AGENDA Page Call to Order Closed Session a) Resolved That Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole closed session as authorized under Section 239 of The Municipal Act, to consider:

Adoption of Closed Minutes of Meetings held September 18, 2019;
Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose - as it relates to benchmarking of Fairmount Home;
Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose - as it relates to enforcing the 2005 Agreement with the City of Kingston for the Apportionment of Costs for Joint Services;
Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board as it relates to enforcing the 2005 Agreement with the City of Kingston for the Apportionment of Costs for Joint Services. Resolved That Council rise from Committee of the Whole closed session with/without reporting Approval of Addendum Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof

11 - 27

Adoption of Minutes a) Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019 Resolved That the minutes of the regular Council meeting held September 18, 2019 be adopted.

Page

Deputations and/or Presentations a)

Presentation to Alison Vandervelde, Community Development Officer Economic Developer’s Association of Canada 2019 Marketing Canada Award – Frontenac County for Best Event - Open Farms in Frontenac

28 - 48

Dr. Moore, Medical Officer of Health, KFL&A Public Health, will present to County Council, highlights of Public Health programs and services along with an overview of the its draft 2020 budget.

49 - 64

Lester Webb, Chief Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, will present to County Council, highlights of the library programs and services along with an overview of the Library’s draft 2020 budget.

65 - 88

Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of the draft Housing and Homelessness Plan update and Early Years System Plan.

Proclamations a) GIS Day November 13, 2019 Whereas Geography Awareness Week is November 10 - 16, 2019; And Whereas International Geographic Information System (GIS) Day is November 13, 2019; And Whereas Geography Awareness Week promotes GIS and geographic literacy; And Whereas GIS is an important part of geography awareness; And Whereas the County of Frontenac is committed to expanding GIS awareness throughout the County in order to showcase real-world applications with GIS. Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac hereby proclaims November 13, 2019 as GIS Day in Frontenac County. Move into Committee of the Whole a) That Council adjourn and meet as Committee of the Whole Council, with the Deputy Warden in the Chair.

89 - 105

Briefings a) Consultant Briefing: Jared Sunderland, J. L. Richards & Associates

Page 2 of 575

Page Limited will brief County Council on the County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment - Building Condition Assessment Report and the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) K&P Trail Bridge Report. [See Information Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer, clause a)] 106 - 123

Mr. Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer, will provide Council with his monthly CAO briefing.

124 - 132

Ms. Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning, will brief Council on Bill 108 regarding changes to the Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act. [See Chief Administrative Officer Information Reports, clause c)]

Unfinished Business

133 - 135

Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a) 2019-118 Corporate Services Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule Recommendation: Resolved That Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services –Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule report; And Further That a by-law be introduced later in the meeting to adopt the 2020 Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule.

136 - 156

2019-119 Corporate Services Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms Recommendation: Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Corporate Services – Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac endorse the report and its recommendations, those being:

The provincial government adopt a model of full proportionate liability to replace joint and several liability.
Implement enhancements to the existing limitations period

Page 3 of 575

Page including the continued applicability of the existing 10-day rule on slip and fall cases given recent judicial interpretations, and whether a 1-year limitation period may be beneficial. 3. Implement a cap for economic loss awards. 4. Increase the catastrophic impairment default benefit limit to $2 million and increase the third-party liability coverage to $2 million in government regulated automobile insurance plans. 5. Assess and implement additional measures which would support lower premiums or alternatives to the provision of insurance services by other entities such as non-profit insurance reciprocals. 6. Compel the insurance industry to supply all necessary financial evidence including premiums, claims, and deductible limit changes which support its, and municipal arguments as to the fiscal impact of joint and several liability. 7. Establish a provincial and municipal working group to consider the above and put forward recommendations to the Attorney General. And Further That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Honourable Doug Downey, Attorney General of Ontario and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). 157 - 160

2019-120 Corporate Services Authorization of the Use of Reserves for the Eastern Ontario Regional Network improvements of cellular coverage in Eastern Ontario Recommendation: Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Corporate Services – Authorization of the Use of Reserves for the Eastern Ontario Regional Network improvements of cellular coverage in Eastern Ontario report; And Further That County Council authorize staff to expense the County of Frontenac’s remaining share amount of $139,750 for the EORN improvements of cellular coverage project from reserves (with $250,000 already authorized from the use of the Municipal Modernization Fund);

161 - 163

2019-122 Frontenac Paramedic Services 2020 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan Recommendation: Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the

Page 4 of 575

Page Emergency and Transportation Services –2020Legislated Response Time Performance Plan report for information; And Further That Council direct the Clerk to introduce a by-law later in the meeting adopting the response time standards as outlined in this report. 164 - 189

2019-123 Fairmount Home Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home Recommendation: Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac (“County Council”) received the Fairmount Home –Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home report for approval; And Further That County Council, as the licensee for Fairmount Home for the Aged (“Fairmount”), shall ensure compliance with the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007 (“LTCHA”) that requires homes meet the staffing and care standards provided for in Ontario Regulation 79/10 (“Regulations”); And Further That County Council shall ensure compliance with the Regulations that includes the requirement for a nursing and personal support services staffing plan that provides for a staffing mix that is consistent with the residents’ assessed care and safety needs; And Further That County Council, as the licensee for Fairmount, support Fairmount’s five-year business plan that includes the plan for service level changes towards a minimum four hours of care per resident per day to ensure that residents’ assessed care and safety needs are met.

190 - 197

2019-121 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Transportation Services – Reporting Document Recommendation: Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Transportation Services – Reporting Document report; And Further That County Council approve the Transportation Reporting Document, to be used by Southern Frontenac Community Services and Rural Frontenac Community Services when submitting quarterly reports

Page 5 of 575

Page on the use of the County grant funding in support of their respective Transportation Services.

198 - 500

Information Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a) 2019-117 Corporate Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment - Building Condition Assessment Report and the Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) K&P Trail Bridge Report

501 - 504

2019-124 Planning and Economic Development Bill 108 – Changes to the Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act

505 - 507

2019-125 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) authorization to proceed with a Shared Administrative Facility and Work Plan update report

508 - 566

2019-128 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019

Reports from Council Liaison Appointees a) Emergency and Transportation Services - Councillor Higgs b)

Long Term Care (Fairmount Home) - Councillor Martin

Corporate Services - Councillor MacDonald

Planning and Economic Development - Councillor Revill

Reports from External Boards and Committees a) Kingston Frontenac Library Board Update - Councillor Revill b)

KFL&A Public Health Board Update - Councillor Doyle

Housing and Homelessness Committee Update - Deputy Warden Smith

Food Policy Council of Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Councillor Higgs

Reports from Advisory Committees of County Council

Page 6 of 575

Page

Return to Council a) That Council revert from Committee of the Whole Council, to Council.

Adoption of the Report of the Committee of the Whole Council a) That the report of the Committee of the Whole Council be adopted and that the necessary actions or by-laws be enacted. Motions, Notice of Which has Been Given a) Future Format of the Annual Warden’s Reception Moved by: Deputy Warden Smith Seconded by: Councillor MacDonald Whereas municipalities across Ontario, including the County of Frontenac are faced with provincial funding cuts and budget constraints; And Whereas other important and Continuing County Priorities noted in the County of Frontenac Strategic Priorities include Respect the taxpayer and keep tax increases close to the rate of inflation; And Whereas the County of Frontenac is facing annual budget increases beyond the rate of inflation: Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the format of the annual Warden’s Reception be changed from a banquet to less formal wine and cheese reception more in line with budget constraints b)

Reducing Litter and Waste in our Communities Moved by: Councillor Doyle Seconded by: Deputy Warden Smith That the Corporation of the County of Frontenac endorse and supports the resolution of the Town of Halton Hills calling upon the Province of Ontario, through the discussion paper entitled “Reducing Litter and Waste in our Communities”, to review and implement a deposit/return program for all single use plastic, aluminum and metal drink containers; And Further That the Province of Ontario review current producer requirements and look for extended producer responsibility for all packaging;

Page 7 of 575

Page And Further That the Province of Ontario request producers to prioritize the implementation of their new requirements in Rural Ontario as five years is too long to wait; And Further That a copy of this motion be sent to the Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario; the Honourable Jeff Yurek, Minister of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks; the Honourable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs; the Association of Municipalities of Ontario; and the Town of Halton Hills. Giving Notice of Motion Communications That Council consent to the following communications of interest to Council listed below be received and filed: a) Letter from the Town of Newmarket Regarding Bill 108 – More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 20, 2019] b)

Letter from Kingston Frontenac Public Library Regarding Minutes of Regular Meeting – June 19, 2019 [Distributed to Members of County Council September 20, 2019]

Letter from the Municipality of Mississippi Mills Regarding Reducing Litter & Waste in Our Communities [Distributed to Members of County Council September 20, 2019]

Correspondence from Dawne Marshall regarding road safety and speed limits. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

Correspondence from AMHS-KFLA Partner providing Transformation Update #10. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

From Frontenac Transportation Services providing additional statistical data requested County Council during its budget presentation. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

From Minister Steve Clark regarding Building Code Services Transformation. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

From the Township of North Glengarry regarding Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

From the Township of Springwater regarding Joint and Several Liability. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

Page 8 of 575

Page j)

Thank you card from Wayne Orr for gifts received on the occasion of his retirement as CAO of South Frontenac. [Distributed to Members of County Council September 27, 2019]

From the City of St. Catharines regarding resolution providing for free menstrual products in City Facilities. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019

From the Town of Penetanguishene regarding resolution concerning Municipal Amalgamation. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 4, 2019]

News release - EOLC launches 2019 Refresh of Regional Economic Strategy. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 4, 2019]

From the City of St. Catharines regarding resolution providing for free menstrual products in City Facilities. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019]

From the Town of Blue Mountains regarding resolution asking Minister Clark to create searchable database of Integrity Commissioner matters. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019]

Invitation from the Friends of Salmon River regarding a Phragmites Workshop. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019]

From the Municipality of East Ferris regarding the provision of child care at conferences. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019]

From the Municipality of Grey Highlands regarding resolution in support of Conservation Authority. [Distributed to Members of County Council October 11, 2019]

Other Business Public Question Period By-Laws – General By-laws and Confirmatory By-law a) First and Second Reading Resolved That leave be given the mover to introduce by-laws a) through d) that have been circulated to all Members of County Council and that by-laws a) through d) be read a first and second time. b)

Third Reading Resolved That by-laws a) through d) be read a third time, signed, sealed and finally passed.

Page 9 of 575

Page By-Laws 567 - 568

To amend By-law No. 2013-0020 (to govern the proceedings of the Council and its Committees, the Conduct of Members and the Calling of Meetings) as it relates to the reading of motions at Council meetings. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0034]

569 - 571

To Establish 2020 Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0035]

572 - 573

To Adopt a 2020 Legislative Response Time Performance Plan. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0036]

574 - 575

Confirmatory By-law [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0037]

Adjournment

Page 10 of 575

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council September 18, 2019 A regular meeting of the Council of the County of Frontenac was held in the Kingston Frontenac Rotary Auditorium at the County Administrative Office, 2069 Battersea Road, Glenburnie on Wednesday, September 18, 2019 and was called to order at 9:00 a.m. Regular business commenced at 9:30 a.m. There was a “Closed Meeting” of the Committee of the Whole from 9:00 am to 9:20 am. Present:

Warden Ron Higgins, Deputy Warden Fran Smith, Councillors Ron Vandewal, Denis Doyle, Bruce Higgs, Bill MacDonald, Gerry Martin and Alan Revill

Also Present:

County: Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer Gale Chevalier, Chief/Director of Emergency & Transportation Services Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Lisa Hirvi, Administrator-Fairmount Home Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Richard Allen, Manager of Economic Development Marco Smits, Communications Officer

Closed Session Motion #: 140-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor MacDonald Councillor Revill

Resolved That Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole closed session as authorized under Section 239 of The Municipal Act, to consider:

Adoption of Closed Minutes of Meetings held July 17, 2019;
labour relations or employee negotiations - as it relates to the contract with the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) for the Howe Island Ferry. Carried Motion #: 141-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Higgs Councillor Martin

Resolved That Council rise from Committee of the Whole closed session, that Procedural By-law 2013-0020 be waived and that the Warden report. Carried (a 2/3 vote was received)

Page 11 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Motion #: 142-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor McDonald

Be It Resolved That the County of Frontenac provide formal notice to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) that it will be terminating the agreement for the operation of the Howe Island Ferry. Carried Public Meeting The following was a public meeting to permit members of the public to make presentations and/or funding requests to County Council for consideration in the 2020 budget. a)

Mr. David Townsend, Executive Director for Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation addressed County Council regarding the funding request for the Southern Frontenac Community Services Corporation.

Ms. Gail Young, Frontenac Transportation Services addressed County Council regarding the funding request for the Frontenac Transportation Services.

Mr. Matt Trousdale addressed County Council regarding the opportunity to secure train sections from Upper Canada Village.

Motion #: 143-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Doyle Deputy Warden Smith

Be It Resolved That procedural By-law 2013-0020 be waived; And Further That the County of Frontenac provide a letter of support to Mr. Matt Trousdale, for the potential acquisition, of the steam locomotives from the St. Lawrence Parks Commission. Carried (a 2/3 vote was received) Approval of Addendum  Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof There were none.

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 12 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 2 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Adoption of Minutes a)

Minutes of Meeting held July 17, 2019.

Motion #: 144-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Deputy Warden Smith

Resolved That the minutes of the regular Council meeting held July 17, 2019 be adopted. Carried Deputations and/or Presentations  Proclamations a)

Canadian Library Month October 2019 Ontario Public Library Week October 20-26, 2019 A visit will get you thinking [See Communications y)]

Motion #: 145-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor Doyle

Whereas the public library offers access to information; and, Whereas the public library supports personal growth, economic renewal and quality of life; and, Whereas we recognize that the Kingston Frontenac Public Library provides a vital service to our communities; Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac hereby proclaims the month of October, 2019 as Canadian Library Month and the week of October 20 - 26, 2019 as Ontario Public Library Week in Frontenac County; And Further That the residents of Frontenac County be encouraged to use the public library this week and throughout the year. Carried Move into Committee of the Whole Motion #: 146-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Martin Councillor MacDonald

That Council adjourn and meet as Committee of the Whole Council, with the Deputy Warden in the Chair. Carried Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 13 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 3 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Briefings a)

Mr. Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer, provided Council with his monthly CAO briefing. Unfinished Business  Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer

Consultant Briefing: Ms. Hannah Mayes, ORH Consulting briefed County Council on the Ten Year Paramedic Human Resources and Facilities Master Plan. [See Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer, clause b)]

Councillor Doyle exited the meeting at 10:50 a.m. Councillor Doyle re-entered the meeting at 10:58 a.m. b)

2019-104 Emergency and Transportation Services ORH Final Report

Motion #: 147-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Councillor Higgs

Be it Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the final report for the Ten Year Paramedic Human Resources and Facilities Master Plan; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to incorporate recommendations into the Frontenac Paramedics’ Business Plan and Project Proposals for future consideration by Council. Carried c)

2019-101 Corporate Services Amendments to Procedural By-law 2013-0020 resulting from Bill 68 as it relates to Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest

Motion #: 148-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Doyle Warden Higgins

Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services – Amendments to Procedural By-law 2013-0020 resulting from Bill 68 as it relates to Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest report; And Further That Procedural By-law 2013-0020, as amended, be further amended as follows:

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 14 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 4 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

That Section 16 – Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest, subsection 16.1 – Method of Disclosure be amended by adding the word “and” at the end of c), and further adding: d)

Shall file a written statement of the interest and its general nature with the Clerk.

That a new 16.5 and 16.6 be added as follows: 16.5

Registry of Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

The Clerk shall establish and maintain a registry in which shall be kept, (a) a copy of each statement filed under section 16.1; and (b) a copy of each declaration recorded under section 16.1

Access to registry

16.6

The registry shall be available for public inspection upon 48 hours written notice to the Clerk’s Office Carried

2019-102 Corporate Services Reading of Resolutions at Council Meetings Motion #: 149-19 Moved By: Councillor MacDonald Seconded By: Councillor Higgs Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services – Reading of Resolutions at Council Meetings report for information; And Further That Council support Option 3 of the report, that being that Section 19 – Motions, of the County’s Procedural By-law be amended to add the following: 19.11

Motion Considered to be read

Motions contained in the published agenda will only be read if requested by a member of Council or under the following conditions: a. A member requests a recorded vote on the motion b. Where an amendment to a main motion is made, both the amendment, and the motion as amended Any member of Council may request that a motion be summarized by its author. Motions not contained in the published agenda shall be read. Carried As Amended (See Motion to Amend below which was Carried)

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 15 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 5 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Motion to Amend Motion #: 150-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Councillor Revill

Be it Resolved That Council supports Option 3 of the report, that being Section 19 – Motions, of the County’s Procedural By-law be amended to add the following: 19.11

Motion Considered to be read

Any member of Council may request that a motion be summarized by its author. Motions not contained in the published agenda shall be read. Carried e)

2019-103 Corporate Services Authorization to enter into an Agreement with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for the provision of Information Services

Motion #: 151-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Doyle Warden Higgins

Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Corporate Services – Authorization to enter into an Agreement with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for the provision of Information Services report; And Further That County Council direct staff to enter into a shared services agreement attached as Schedule A, through which the County of Frontenac will provide information technology services to the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA); Carried f)

2019-105 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Regional Roads - Option Analysis and Business Plan

Motion #: 152-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Martin Councillor Vandewal

Be It Resolved That Office of the CAO Report 2019-105, Regional Roads – Option Analysis and Business Plan be received; Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 16 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 6 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

And Further That County Council direct staff to:

Engage KPMG Canada to complete an option analysis and business plan for consideration by County Council as part of the 2020 County Budget. Carried As Amended (See Motion to Amend below which was Carried) Motion to Amend Motion #: 153-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Councillor Doyle

Be it Resolved That the motion be amended to delete bullet point 2, Commence the process of petitioning the Province of Ontario to delete Section 6.2 from the County restructuring order dated February 15, 1997. Carried g)

2019-106 Corporate Services Approval of the County of Frontenac Recruitment and Selection Policy

Motion #: 154-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor MacDonald

Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services - Approval of the County of Frontenac Recruitment and Selection Policy report for information; And Further That the Clerk be authorized to bring forward a By-law later in the meeting adopting the Recruitment and Selection Policy attached to this report as Appendix A. Carried h)

2019-107 Corporate Services 2019 Tax Ratios and Tax Rate Reductions Amendment

Motion #: 155-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Higgs Councillor Doyle

Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac accept this Corporate Services – 2019 Tax Ratios and Tax Rate Reductions Amendment report; And Further That Council consider a by-law, introduced later in the meeting, to confirm the 2019 tax ratios and tax rate. Carried

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 17 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 7 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

2019-110 Fairmount Home Public Inquiry into the Safety and Security of Residents in the LongTerm Care Homes System

Motion #: 156-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Martin Councillor Vandewal

Resolved That Council of the County of Frontenac received the Fairmount Home Public Inquiry into the Safety and Security of Residents in the Long-Term Care Homes System report for approval; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac support the Consolidated Recommendations regarding the Role of Long-Term Care Homes and other recommendations specific to licensees of long-term care homes, which are presented in the Public Inquiry into the Safety and Security of Residents in the Long-Term Care Homes System Report (“Report”); And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac support staff in implementing the Consolidated Recommendations and other recommendations specific to long-term care home licensees presented in the Report, as well as, Fairmount Home’s plan for service level changes for a minimum four hours of care per resident per day to ensure a safe and secure environment for residents; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac, as the licensee for Fairmount Home for the Aged (“Fairmount”), encourage the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to take the steps to promptly implement the recommendations in the Report and release a public report on the first anniversary of the release of the Report. Carried j)

2019-111 Emergency and Transportation Services Howe Islander Ferry Safety Announcements

Motion #: 157-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Higgs Councillor MacDonald

Be it Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the report on Ferry Safety Announcements; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to implement Option 2 as outlined, that being to direct staff to cease the current practice of audible safety announcements and re-institute information safety notice placards. Carried As Amended (See Motion to Amend below which was Carried)

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 18 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 8 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Motion to Amend Motion #: 158-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Doyle Councillor Higgs

Be It Resolved That the motion be amended to insert Option 2, that being to direct staff to cease the current practice of audible safety announcements and re-institute information safety notice placards. Carried k)

2019-113 Planning & Economic Development Authorization for staff to enter into agreements with local snowmobile clubs for use of the Frontenac K&P Trail during winter months

Motion #: 159-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor Doyle

Be it Resolved That Council authorize staff to enter into a License Agreement and Memorandum of Understand with the local OFSC snowmobile clubs for use of the Frontenac K&P Trail and to complete annual renewals of these agreements. Carried Information Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer a)

2019-108 Emergency and Transportation Services Investigation of Options to Ensure Howe Island Ferry Staffing 2019-109 Fairmount Home Quarterly Update Activity Report 2019-112 Corporate Services 2019 Second Quarter Financial Summary 2019-114 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer Resolution from the City of Kingston regarding the 2019 Budget UpdateCounty of Frontenac Services Reports from Council Liaison Appointees

Emergency and Transportation Services - Councillor Higgs

Councillor Higgs provided an overview of the Emergency and Transportation Services liaison activities since the last Council Meeting.

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 19 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 9 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Long Term Care (Fairmount Home) - Councillor Martin

Councillor Martin provided an overview of Long Term Care (Fairmount Home) liaison activities since the last Council Meeting. c)

Corporate Services - Councillor MacDonald

Councillor MacDonald provided an overview of the Corporate Services liaison activities since the last Council meeting. d)

Planning and Economic Development - Councillor Revill

Councillor Revill provided an overview of the Planning and Economic Development liaison activities since the last Council meeting. Reports from External Boards and Committees a)

Kingston Frontenac Library Board Update - Councillor Revill

Councillor Revill provided an overview of the Kingston Frontenac Library Board activities since the last Council meeting. b)

KFL&A Public Health Board Update - Councillor Doyle

Councillor Doyle provided an overview of the Kingston, Frontenac Lennox and Addington Board of Health activities since the last Council meeting. c)

Housing and Homelessness Committee Update - Deputy Warden Smith

Deputy Warden Smith provided an overview of the Housing and Homelessness Committee activities since the last Council meeting. d)

Food Policy Council of Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington Councillor Higgs

No report. e)

AMO Report - Warden Higgins

Warden Higgins provided an overview of his AMO Update.

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 20 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 10 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Reports from Advisory Committees of County Council a)

Report of the Administrative Building Design Task Force

Motion #: 160-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Councillor Martin

That the Report received from the Administrative Building Design Task Force be received and adopted. Report of the Administrative Building Design Task Force The Administrative Building Design Task Force reports and recommends as follows: 1.

2019-092 Administrative Building Design Task Force Authorization to Move Forward with a Shared Facility Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize staff to proceed with negotiations with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for joint tenancy and subsequently, detailed designs for 2069 Battersea Road for Option 2, that being a joint administrative facility for the County of Frontenac and the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) to an upset of $100,000 to be expensed from the County’s Municipal Modernization Funds; And Further That should the CRCA advise the County of Frontenac that it does not wish to proceed with a joint administrative facility, that staff be authorized to proceed with detailed designs for Option 1. Carried b)

Report of the Planning Advisory Committee

Motion #: 161-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor MacDonald Councillor Revill

That the Report received from the Planning Advisory Committee be received and adopted. Report of the Planning Advisory Committee The Planning Advisory Committee reports and recommends as follows: 1.

2019-098 Planning and Economic Development Response to Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) Review Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac direct staff to submit the comments as set out in Appendix 1 of this report to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing prior to the deadline of October 21st, 2019;

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 21 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 11 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

And Further That a copy of this resolution and Appendix 1 be forwarded to the County’s member municipalities. Carried c)

Report of the Community Development Advisory Committee

Motion #: 162-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Doyle Councillor Higgs

That the Report received from the Community Development Advisory Committee be received and adopted. Report of the Community Development Advisory Committee The Community Development Advisory Committee reports and recommends as follows: 1.

2019-096 Community Development Advisory Committee Temporary Access Agreement with Verona ATV Club / OFATV Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize the Warden and Clerk to enter into a temporary agreement with the Verona ATV Club allow motorized vehicles to access the K& P Trail from Craig Road to Sharbot Lake for 2019 and 2020; And Further That County staff report back on the status of the partnership with the Verona ATV Club/OFATV prior to any future renewal.

2019-093 Community Development Advisory Committee Development of a Frontenac Arts Strategy Be It Resolved That the County of Frontenac pursue the development of an arts strategy in 2021; And Further That the foundational work to recruit project partners, attract project funding and improve operational capacity be undertaken in 2020 to achieve this end.

2019-095 Community Development Advisory Committee Royal Winter Fair’s Spotlight on Local Be it Resolved that the Council of the County of Frontenac authorize staff to enter into a contract with The Royal Winter Fair to participate in the 2019 Spotlight on Local feature;

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 22 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 12 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

And Further that up to $5,000 from the Community Development Reserve be allocated to offset the costs associated with participating in the Royal Winter Fair’s Spotlight on Local; And Further that staff report back to the Community Development Advisory Committee on the outcomes of event participation. Carried Return to Council Motion #: 163-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Warden Higgins Councillor Vandewal

That Council revert from Committee of the Whole Council, to Council. Carried Adoption of the Report of the Committee of the Whole Council Motion #: 164-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Deputy Warden Smith Councillor Martin

That the report of the Committee of the Whole Council be adopted and that the necessary actions or by-laws be enacted. Carried Motions, Notice of Which has Been Given  Giving Notice of Motion a)

Deputy Warden Smith advised that she will be bringing forward a Notice of Motion to the October 16, 2019 Council meeting regarding the future of the annual Warden’s reception.

Councillor Doyle advised that he will be bringing forward a Notice of Motion to the October 16, 2019 Council meeting regarding a motion of support for the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks posted discussion paper titled “Reducing Litter and Waste in our Communities”. Communications

That Council consent to the following communications of interest to Council listed below be received and filed: a)

From Southern Frontenac Community Services providing its Mid-July Bulleting [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] From the City of Stratford regarding Resolution opposing changes in 2019 Provincial Budget and Planning Act [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019]

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 23 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 13 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

d) e)

k) l)

m) n)

From the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario regarding the 2020 Council Award [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] From the Municipality of Neebing regarding Response to Lake of Bays [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] From the Town of Plympton-Wyoming regarding resolution on Enforcement for Safety on Family Farms [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] From the Township of Prince regarding resolution in support of dedicated annual ROMA Conference [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] From the Village of Oil Springs supporting resolution of the Township of Warwick regarding stronger enforcement of By-laws [Distributed to Members of County Council July 19, 2019] Letter from Kingston Frontenac Public Library Regarding the Retirement of Patricia Enright as of August 31, 2019 [Distributed to Members of County Council July 26, 2019] Letter from the Town of Halton Hills Regarding Resolution Number. 20190141 [Distributed to Members of County Council July 26, 2019] Letter from the Corporation of the Municipality of South Huron Regarding Motion Number 382-2019. [Distributed to Members of County Council July 26, 2019] Letter from Morrison Hershfield Regarding the Detail Design Study [Distributed to Members of County Council July 26, 2019] Letter from The Municipality of McDougall Regarding Enforcement for Safety on Family Farms [Distributed to Members of County Council August 2, 2019] Letter from the Township of McKellar Regarding Municipal Amalgamation [Distributed to Members of County Council August 2, 2019] Letter from the City of Kingston Regarding the Housing and Homelessness Report [Distributed to Members of County Council August 2, 2019] Letter from ROMA Regarding the Rural Ontario Institute’s Focus on Rural Ontario 2018 Fact Sheet Series [Distributed to Members of County Council August 2, 2019] Letter from Norfolk County Regarding Request for Provincial Response to Address Gas Well Issues [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from the Municipality of Bluewater Regarding Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from the Township of North Frontenac Regarding the Request for Support for VIA Rail’s High Frequency Train Proposal [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from the Corporation of the Municipality of Thames Centre Regarding the Enforcement for Safety on Family Farms Resolution [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019]

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 24 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 14 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

aa)

ab) ac) ad) ae) af)

ag)

ah)

ai)

aj)

Letter from the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury Regarding the Motion with Respect to the Never Forgotten National Memorial [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from the Municipality of Chatham-Kent Regarding the Enforcement for Safety on Family Farms Resolution [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from Central Frontenac Regarding the Resolution 2019-046 Requiring the Lower Tier Municipalities to Review and Consider the Regional Roads Report [Distributed to Members of County Council August 16, 2019] Letter from The Municipality of Hastings Highlands Regarding Reducing Litter and Waste in Our Communities [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Letter from The Municipality of Hastings Highlands Regarding Municipal Amalgamation [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Letter from Kingston Public Library Regarding Canadian Library Month and Ontario Library Week [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Letter from the Corporation of the Township of Papineau-Cameron Regarding Amalgamation [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Letter from Canadian Union of Postal Workers Regarding the Future of Canada Post [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Fall Schedule from Early ON Child and Family Centre [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Birthday Invitation from Sydenham Early ON Child and Family Centre [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Birthday Invitation from Sharbot Lake Early ON Child and Family Centre [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Birthday Invitation from Storrington Early ON Child and Family Centre [Distributed to Members of County Council August 23, 2019] Notice from the Township of Central Frontenac Concerning By-Law Amendment 2019-36 (Brown and Smail) [Distributed to Members of County Council August 30, 2019] Letter from the Corporation of the Township of Lake of Bays Regarding Municipal Amalgamation [Distributed to Members of County Council August 30, 2019] Letter from the Municipality of Mississippi Mills Regarding the Resolution to Ensure Enforcement for Safety on Family Farms [Distributed to Members of County Council September 6, 2019] Letter from the Town of Wasaga Beach Regarding the Township of McKellar Municipal Amalgamation [Distributed to Members of County Council September 6, 2019] Letter from Hamilton City Council Regarding Maintaining the Voters’ List from Municipal Elections [Distributed to Members of County Council September 6, 2019]

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 25 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 15 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ak) al)

am)

an) ao)

ap)

aq)

Letter from the City of Kitchener Regarding Single-Use Disposable Wipes [Distributed to Members of County Council September 6, 2019] Letter from the City of Kitchener Regarding Producer Requirements for Packaging in Ontario [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019] Letter from the Corporation of the Township of Larder Lake Regarding Lobbying the Provincial Ministers to allow for Electronic Delegation [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019] Letter from the City of Kingston Regarding the Notice of a Regular Meeting [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019] Letter from The Municipality of Hasting Highlands Regarding Mandatory Septic System Reports [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019] Letter from the Municipality of Chatham-Kent Regarding Provincial Funding Cuts to Legal Aid Ontario [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019] Email from the Township of Zorra Regarding Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA) [Distributed to Members of County Council September 13, 2019]

Other Business a)

Warden Higgins stated that he will be approaching the Eastern Ontario Warden’s Caucus (EOWC) to look at an Ontario wide trails maintenance and licensing program, including options and studies. Public Question Period  By-Laws – General By-laws and Confirmatory By-law

First and Second Reading

Motion #: 165-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor MacDonald

Resolved That leave be given the mover to introduce by-laws a) through f) that have been circulated to all Members of County Council and that by-laws a) through f) be read a first and second time. Carried b)

Third Reading

Motion #: 166-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Revill Councillor MacDonald

Resolved That by-laws a) through f) be read a third time, signed, sealed and finally passed. Carried

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 26 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

2019 Page 16 of 17

AGENDA ITEM #a)

By-Laws a)

To Adopt a Policy to Govern the Hiring of Employees by the Corporation of the County of Frontenac. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0029] To Authorize the Execution of an Agreement with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) for Information Services. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0028] To Set Tax Ratios and Tax Rate Reductions for Prescribed Property SubClasses for County of Frontenac Purposes and Local Municipal Purposes for the Taxation year 2019. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0030] To Authorize the Execution of an Agreement with the Ontario Federation of Snowmobile Clubs (OFSC) for the use of the K&P Trails during Winter Months. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0031] To Amend By-law No.2013-0020 (to govern the proceedings of the Council and its Committees, the Conduct of Members and the Calling of Meetings) regarding Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest (resulting from Bill 68). [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0032] To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings of County Council on September 18, 2019. [Proposed By-law No. 2019-0033] Adjournment

Motion #: 167-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Higgs Deputy Warden Smith

That the meeting hereby adjourn at 12:14 p.m. Carried

Ron Higgins, Warden

Regular Meeting of Council Minutes September 18,

Page 27 of 575 Minutes of Meeting held September 18, 2019

Jannette Amini, Clerk

2019 Page 17 of 17

Page 28 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

KFL&A Public Health Cost-Shared Budget (Mandatory Programs) County of Frontenac

Dr. Kieran Moore MD, CCFP(EM), FCFP, FRCP(C) Medical Officer of Health KFL&A Public Health October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Healthy People, Healthy Places

Page 29 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Canadian Public Health Association, April 29, 2015

Page 30 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

What is Public Health? • Ontario Public Health Standards • Health Protection and Promotion Act • Board of Health – 5 municipal AGENDA ITEM #b)

– 4 provincial

Page 31 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Public Health Over the Life Course

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 32 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

What We Do On average, each month: Restaurant inspections Personal service settings inspections Pool and spas inspections

30 30 15 210 390

– Healthy built environments – Jingle Bell Run – Community/Opioid Drug Strategy – Many, many collaborative groups and tables

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Animal bite investigations Lyme disease investigations Sexual health and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis clients Vaccines administered

190

Our work in the community also includes:

Page 33 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 34 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 35 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 36 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 37 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 38 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Strategic Directions Over the course of the next five years, KFL&A Public Health will: Provide programs and services of high quality that are supported by the best evidence.

Champion, support, and deliver strategies and initiatives to address health disparities, and priority and emerging health issues.

Strengthen and enhance our collaboration with communities and partners.

Invest in a healthy and supportive work environment where everyone lives our values.

Foster efficiency and innovation to maximize the impact of our resources.

AGENDA ITEM #b)

2020 Budget Planning Assumptions

Page 39 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

KFL&A Public Health Cost-Shared Budget

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 40 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

KFLA 2020 Budget Planning Assumptions

AGENDA ITEM #b)

• No change to base funding provided by the Ministry for 2019 based on a teleconference with the Ministry this month • 1.5% increase to municipal contribution (if Board agrees based on Kingston’s letter), no input from other municipal partners • Budgetary deficit estimated at about $168K to be covered by available Board of Health Reserve Fund (see next slide) • As directed by the Province, excludes 100% funded Ontario Seniors Dental Care program (new for 2019) and 100% MOH Compensation initiative (had been included in 2019 % calculation • Mitigation funding for municipal partners is not available because it is not required • RISK – the Province will reduce funding based on 75:25 and 100% ratios to reach 70:30 ratio across the Board – but that is not what we have been led to understand in two separate conversations

Page 41 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

KFLA 2020 Planning Assumptions

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 42 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 43 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Cost-Shared Budget *

AGENDA ITEM #b)

% are based on the approved 2019 Cost-Shared Budget, 2020 Budget not yet approved

Page 44 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Other funded programs typically April to March fiscal year

Shared Library Services Partnership $125,074 (Provincial funding 2019-20 Amount*) •

KFLAPH acts as a hub to provide provide 4 area public health units without an in-house library with access to up-to-date information and scientific resources, and to preserve the existing library infrastructure across the province.

Food for You Food for Two $90,000 (Federal funding 2018-19 Amount*) •

free prenatal education and nutrition program for pregnant women, teens, and their support persons. Each week participants will meet new people, prepare food, and eat together.

Health Links $433,420 (SE LHIN funding 2019-20 Amount*) Portal-based technology solution that enhances individual patient care by facilitating the sharing of information to enable person-centered care coordination

•

Other smaller grants and one-time funding vary by year

AGENDA ITEM #b)

•

Page 45 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services (MCCSS) 100% Funding April to March fiscal year $2,875,626 (based on 2019-2020 amounts approved by the Board in 2019)

Healthy Babies Healthy Children $1,206,332 (requirement under the OPHS) • Home visiting program intended to optimize newborn and child healthy growth and development Pre-School Speech and Language $873,171 • System of partner agencies in KFL&A that provides speech and language services to children and their families from birth up to the end of junior kindergarten Infant Hearing $658,608 • Program designed to identify babies with permanent hearing loss and to provide services to help children with communication and language development

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Blind-Low Vision $137,515 • Program designed to give children who are born blind or with low vision the best possible start in life by providing education and support for parents

Page 46 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Part VIII Budget Part VIII (Building Code Act): • Septic system inspection program • A cost recovery program

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 47 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Questions?

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 48 of 575KFL&A Public Health, will present… Dr. Moore , Medical Officer of Health,

Thank you!

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

49 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Library Service in Frontenac County – 2020 Draft Budgets

Building Community Vitality  Literacy – early years programming and technological support  Life long Learning – collections and programming in support of rural lifestyles  Enriching Spaces and Services –provide communities with safe and accessible supports during times of growth and change.  Build Relationships – pursue collaborative opportunities to provide more efficient and effective programming. Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

50 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Diverse . Strong . Resilient

Arden Branch  Installation of new flooring  Interior walls will be painted  Installation of new shelving  New furniture will be purchased early in 2020 Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

51 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Facility Highlights

Access and Support  Free Wi-Fi (24/7)

 Technology Tutors  Tech Drop-in Sessions

 Tech Workshops Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

52 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Technology Highlights

2019 Highlights – In the Community  Park Passes

 Farmers’ Markets  Lakes and Trails Festival  Visits to schools and EarlyOn centres  StoryWalk® - Bon Echo Provincial Park and Sharbot Lake Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

53 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Programming & Outreach

2019 Highlights – Rural Branches  KFPL Live Speaker Series  Grown up Story Time  Summer Reading Challenge  Puppet Show Tour

 Telling Your Story

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

54 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Programming & Outreach

AGENDA ITEM #c)

55 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

56 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

City / County Agreement

% 87

% 13

City of Kingston

County of Frontenac

Facility costs are not part of the above formula. Frontenac County funds the 11 branches in the Townships of Frontenac. Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

57 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Operating & Capital Budgets

Context  Increasing demand for e-content  Rising cost of e-books, e-audiobooks  Average cost of library materials in 2019 has risen 1.4% over 2018  Purchasing power - impact of the value of the Canadian dollar  Rising costs for service agreements. Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

58 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Operating & Capital Budgets

Facility Costs  City of Kingston provides funding to the Library Board to operate and maintain the five branches in the City  Townships operate and maintain facilities for the branches in the County  These costs are not part of the 87/13 funding formula  County is responsible for a percentage of operating costs for Administration and Technical Services at Central Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

59 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Operating & Capital Budgets

Revenues 2020

2019

Variance

Percentage

County of Frontenac

$863,489

$850,282

$13,207

1.55%

City of Kingston

$6,631,582

$6,509,613

$121,969

1.87%

Province of Ontario

$297,138

Self-generated*

$279,963

$286,530

$6,567

-2.29%

Total

$8,072,172

$7,943,563

$128,609

1.62%

*Self-generated revenue: grants, facility rentals, fines/damages, printing, donations, etc. Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

60 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Draft Operating Budget 2020

Expenditures 2020

2019

Variance

Percentage

$5,981,767

$5,882,295

$99,472

1.69%

Collection Material

$890,230

$876,117

$14,113

1.61%

System-Wide

$708,508

$706,598

$1,910

0.27%

$491,667

$478,552

$128,609

2.74%

Staffing Costs (salaries, wages, benefits)

Facilities (City of Kingston)

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

61 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Draft Operating Budget 2020

Shared Costs Total Amount

City of Kingston (87%)

County & Townships (13%)

Technology

$246,000

$214,020

$31,980

Branch Revitalization

$150,000

$130,500

$19,500

Total

$396,000

$344,520

$51,480

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

62 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Draft Capital Budget 2020

Looking to the Future 2021

2022

2023

Overall Increase

2.20%

2.27%

1.91%

County of Frontenac

2.13%

2.65%

2.12%

City of Kingston

2.35%

2.43%

2.04%

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

63 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Draft Operating Budget 2020

Kingston Frontenac Public Library

AGENDA ITEM #c)

64 of 575 Lester Webb , Chief Page Librarian/CEO, Kingston Frontenac Public Library, wi…

Thank you for your support.

Page 65 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

10-Year Municipal Housing and Homelessness Plan for the City of Kingston and County of Frontenac

Five-Year Review

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Update for County of Frontenac October 16th 2019

Page 66 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan Five-Year Update - Background • • •

In late 2013 City and County adopted the 10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan for the City of Kingston and County of Frontenac. In 2016 the Province released policy statement requiring Service Managers to update 10-Year Plans – deadline of December 31, 2019 established for submission to Ministry. Housing staff have compiled background data, experience from implementing first five years of the plan, and retained professional housing data and policy analysis expertise.

AGENDA ITEM #d)

•

Housing Services Act, 2011 requires Service Managers to develop housing and homelessness plans.

Page 67 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan Review and Update - Background •

Review process to be comprised of three main phases:

Environmental Scan and Needs Assessment
Stakeholder Engagement

• •

Compilation, update, and approval of updated 10-Year Plan

Current status: completion of phase 1 and initial component of phase 2 Consultation processes to-date have included:

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Community housing providers (i.e. social and affordable housing), supportive and transitional housing providers, housing support service providers, emergency housing (i.e. homeless) providers, Mayor’s Task Force on Housing, internal City and County staff, and Indigenous housing and support service providers and community members

Page 68 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

10-Year Housing and Homelessness Plan Consultant Team Michel Frojmovic – Director and owner, Acacia Consulting Urban & Community Planner and Project Manager who has directed and managed numerous projects in the areas of strategic planning, monitoring & evaluation and policy research & analysis.

Steve Pomeroy – Head of Focus Consulting Inc. Specializes in housing policy research, housing strategy, financial feasibility and market analysis.

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Consultant team is supported by Housing and Social Services staff in partnership with funded and unfunded sector organizations.

Page 69 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Market performing well… •

In general, new housing construction starts match population and household growth.

•

Home prices are relatively reasonable.

• Market open to first time buyers. •

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Census Metropolitan Area expected to grow to 176,000 by 2026, 87% of growth expected to occur in City of Kingston; majority of growth expected to occur in the County will be focussed in South Frontenac.

Page 70 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Dwelling Type – Composition •

City of Kingston 0.5%

96% of dwellings in County are single-detached homes.

Single-detached

35.4% 49.6%

Semi-detached Row House

•

Apartment

90% of County households are owners.

Other 6.9% 7.6%

County of Frontenac 0.2% 2.1% 1.1% 0.7%

•

Rental housing formats are limited in the County.

Single-detached

Row House Apartment Other 95.9%

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Semi-detached

Page 71 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Rental Vacancies • • •

Rental market experiencing very low vacancy rate. Low vacancy rate creates pressure in rental market and pushes rents higher. In the County 10% rent housing versus the City where 40% rent housing. Kingston CMA

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 72 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Rental Vacancies • •

Vacancy rate has recently been impacted by increased rates of in-migration. In-migration primarily comprised of intraprovincial migration (people moving to Kingston from elsewhere in the province – possibly downsizers from GTA) and non-permanent residents (primarily international students). Kingston CMA

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 73 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Core Housing Need • •

Core Housing Need measures housing needs by affordability (paying over 30% of before-tax income), adequacy (dwelling in need of major repair), and suitability (sufficient number of bedrooms for household). In the County, adequacy either alone or in combination with affordability, is a more of a challenge reflecting homes in a state of disrepair.

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 74 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Core Housing Need Who is in need?

•

While the incidence of need appears to be very high among renter households in the County, this is based on a small number of renters in these areas.

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 75 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Core Housing Need Who is in need?

•

In the City need is spread across all age groups; in the County, however, it is more evident among older (over 45 age groups). County Data

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 76 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Rural Homelessness • • • •

AGENDA ITEM #d)

• • •

Urban and rural homelessness enumeration processes completed in April 2018. Survey was completed by 37 households representing 61 individuals. 75% of respondents were staying with a friend or family. 19% of respondents, or 7 households, were sleeping in some form of shelter unfit for long-term accommodation (e.g. hunt camp, seasonal dwelling, recreational vehicle, etc.). 16% of respondents were youth (age 16 to 24). 46% of households self-identified as Indigenous. Numbers of homeless individuals in the County appear to be increasing modestly relative to 2013 and 2016 enumeration projects.

Page 77 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Service Provider Consultation • •

• •

AGENDA ITEM #d)

•

Housing First program is hindered by limited rental housing availability in the rural area. Homeless households may not want to relocate to Kingston. Lack of transportation in the rural area is a significant barrier to homeless individuals accessing available services. Service Providers recommended that the City and County continue to partner to complete a needs assessment survey to understand the scope and depth of rural need in relation to housing and homelessness. Continue to complete urban and rural homelessness enumeration every two years. Enhance prevention and diversion programs in both the urban and rural areas (i.e. it can be easier to prevent homelessness rather than trying to find housing for someone that has become homeless).

Page 78 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Next Steps • •

• •

Circulate draft 10-Year Plan actions to key stakeholders (including County) Consider feedback and adjust as appropriate

Present draft update 10-Year Plan to Housing and Homelessness Advisory Committee, community, and key stakeholders

•

Respond to comments from MMAH

•

Present final updated 10-Year Plan to City and County Councils

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Submit update 10-Year Plan to Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) for review and comment

Page 79 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Early Years and Child Care System Service Plan County of Frontenac

October, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Update & Summary of Findings

Page 80 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Highlights for Today • Early Years & Child Care Service Plan - Background

• Invest Early for a Strong Start

• Early Learning in the County of Frontenac

AGENDA ITEM #d)

• Emerging Trends & Next Steps

Page 81 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Background on the Early Years & Child Care Service System Plan Project Mission Development of a Child Care and Early Years System Plan to guide child care and early years services in Kingston and Frontenac.

• An Environmental Scan assessing current

and future child care and early years’ service gaps (April) • A public engagement process consulting

parents and caregivers and community partners in Kingston and Frontenac (MayJune) • Develop strategic priorities & draft plan

(June-October) • Community follow up & finalize plan

(October-December)

AGENDA ITEM #d)

This will include work to develop a vision for early years and child care in Kingston & Frontenac that is aligned with Ontario’s vision and provincial interest, as well as the establishment of clear priorities and actions for moving forward.

Project Outline

Page 82 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Early Years & Child Care Plan The service plan is built on the foundation of 4 Primary Pillars

Enabling safe and reliable programs built on positive, responsive relationships, engaging environments, and meaningful experiences for children and families, delivered by educated and well-supported staff

Early years partners come together collaborate and enhance supports and improve affordability to ensure all children have the best possible start in life

Quality

Accessible

Responsive Ensure programs reflect the diverse needs of the community through spaces that are inclusive and culturally appropriate, located in schools, communities, workplaces and home settings so that families can choose the options that work best for them

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Increasing access to early years programs to give families more opportunity to benefit from high-quality early childhood programs and services

Affordable

Page 83 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Invest Early for a Strong Start The science of early years has proven the first six years of life are the most critical for brain development. Experiences, both positive and negative, in these earliest years form the foundation for overall health & wellbeing. Investing in young children through high quality early learning opportunities sets them up for a lifetime of success and creates stronger social and economic outcomes for all communities. A strong child care system will also create an improved economic environment by allowing parents to enter the workforce, increase earnings while their children gain foundational skills they need to be productive in the workforce later in life. This plan will provide perspective on early years trends that will help inform the best investment for the critical years of early childhood development and help enhance positive early life experiences that lay a strong foundation for better health outcomes and social engagement across an individual’s lifespan.

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Page 84 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Early Years & Child Care in the County of Frontenac Current picture of the early years services available in the County of Frontenac.

In the County…. 3,325 CHILDREN 0-12 YEARS 0-50

51-75

76-100

101-1000

3 Licensed Child Care Programs 169 Licensed Child Care spaces for children 0 to 12 years

9 EarlyON Child & Family Program sites 85 Hours of programming per week for children under 6 and their families

Services available to those;

•

Living & working in the county An increase use by those visiting the county Source: Statistics Canada 2016 Census Child Care and Early Years location data, City of Kingston 2019

AGENDA ITEM #d)

•

Page 85 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Early Years & Child Care in the County of Frontenac How has the population of families with children 0 to 12 years of age changed? •

Increase of 4% (125) of children 0 to 12 years from 2011 to 2016

North Frontenac

10%

Central Frontenac

-17%

10% increase in North Frontenac– In 2016 there were 160 children 0 to 12, with majority of growth in children under 4, with very few program options South Frontenac has the largest population of children aged 0 to 12 at 2,555 (growth of 1%) with only 2 licensed child care centres with capacity of 145 spaces – which could only serve 6% of this population

South Frontenac

Frontenac Islands

-26% Source: Statistics Canada 2016 Census

AGENDA ITEM #d)

•

Change in the County….

Page 86 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

EYCC Service Plan Engagement Who we talked to…

How we reached out…

• County of Frontenac CAO • Frontenac Township CAO’s • County Residents • Child Care Centre Operators

• Interviews • Surveys • Pop up events

• School Boards • Public Health

• Indigenous Communities • And many others….

AGENDA ITEM #d)

• Library

• Focus groups

Page 87 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

What we Heard in the County • Transportation is a major barrier to access early years

services • Greater access to early years & child care programs in the

county to reduce waitlist and availability that is close to home • Families feel isolated from early years system

• Affordability – less availability to subsidy with lack of licensed

• Increase emphasizes for the ongoing need to consult with

county residents on child care and early years needs for the rural community

AGENDA ITEM #d)

child care capacity in parts of the County

Page 88 of 575 Ms. Ruth Noordegraaf, will provide County Council with a presentation of…

Emerging Trends & Next Steps • Support improve access to high quality licensed early years programs and

supports across the Kingston & Frontenac geographic areas • Support positive parenting practices in the community through partnerships

and collaborations • Increase the communication of early years resources on the city and county

websites through an updated marketing campaign • Respond to community interests & needs for early years services by

• Strengthen economic development supports in our communities through a

strong and stable early years & child care service system

AGENDA ITEM #d)

continuously improving processes and ensure they are responsive, effective & measurable

PageSunderland, 89 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township

Building Condition Assessment County of Frontenac

October 16th, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 90 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township

Table of Contents Who We Are Our Presence & Practice in Ontario

Our Team Frontenac County Building Condition Assessment

www.jlrichards.ca www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Methodology / Quality Assurance / Quality Control

PageSunderland, 91 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Who We Are  Founded in 1955  Architectural, Engineering and Planning firm offering integrated, multidisciplinary services across a broad range of sectors and geographic regions  100% employee-owned

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 92 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Our Presence & Practice in Ontario

• 60+ years of experience • Community impact based practice

• 300+ employees • Over $100M annual construction value www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

• 7 offices

PageSunderland, 93 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

County of Frontenac

Our Team

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited

Project Manager/ Architect Jared Sunderland, OAA

Peer Review Raimond Cuda, OAA, LEED® AP Senior Architect

Key Personnel

Mechanical Engineer

Electrical Engineer

Structural Engineer

Civil Engineer

Engineer Paulo Escudero,

Engineer Brennan McGurn,

Engineer Jevon Austin,

Engineer Steve Saxton,

P. Eng.

P. Eng

P. Eng.

Senior Peer Review Jim Everson, P.Eng.

Senior Peer Review James O’Connor,

Senior Peer Review Matthew Burtt,

Senior Peer Review Matt Morkem,

P.Eng.

P. Eng.

LEED® AP.

Ph.D, P. Eng., LEED® AP.

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Additional Support from Intermediate & Junior Resources

PageSunderland, 94 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Frontenac County Building Condition Assessment  Fairmont Home  County of Frontenac Administrative Building      

Sydenham Road Ambulance Base Palace Road Ambulance Base Robertsville Ambulance Base Parham Ambulance Base Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Fairmont Home Paramedic Offices

 K&P Trail Bridges (x5)

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 Howe Island Ferry Building

PageSunderland, 95 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Methodology/Quality Assurance/Quality Control     

Background Information & Document Review Preparation of Investigation Templates Detailed BCA/ Field Work Draft Report Review Final Reporting

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 96 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Methodology/Quality Assurance/Quality Control     

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Background Information & Document Review Preparation of Investigation Templates Detailed BCA/ Field Work Draft Report Review Final Reporting  A summary of the various building systems;  Methodology employed;  A summary of the findings;  A recommendation for repair and upgrade;  Photos of the existing facility;  A conclusion to the report with recommendations;  Class ‘D’ opinions of probable construction cost;  Asset Inventory Summary Tables

PageSunderland, 97 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Building Condition Assessment Report

September 2019

Prepared for: THE COUNTY OF FRONTENAC 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0

Prepared by:

JLR No.: 28833‐000.1

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 203‐863 Princess Street Kingston, ON K7L 5N4 Tel: 613‐544‐1424 Fax: 613‐544‐5679

PageSunderland, 98 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Example Categories in Hierarchical Structure

     

Level 3: Asset Building Structure Building Envelope Roof Building Interior Emergency Power System Etc.

 

     

Level 2: Class Architectural and Structural HVAC Plumbing Elevators Parking Lots/Lane Ways Etc.

     

Level 4: Attribute Exterior Walls Roof Assembly Slab on Grade Transformers Generator Etc.

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

  

Level 1: Facility Fairmount Home County of Frontenac Administration Office Building Palace Road Ambulance Base Sydenham Ambulance Base Etc.

PageSunderland, 99 of 575 J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Condition Rating System Replacement Grade

Condition

Unacceptable

Poor

Description

Time Frame

Failed or failure imminent. Immediate need to replace most or all of attribute. Hazards exist or attribute cannot be serviced or operated without risk to personnel/public/environment.



Poor physical condition – heavy wear and tear, failure is likely in short term. Likely need to replace most or all of attribute within 5 years. No immediate risk, but work required within 5 years to ensure attribute remains operational.



Acceptable physical condition – moderate wear and tear, moderate risk of physical failure. Failure unlikely within next 5 years but further deterioration likely and major rehabilitation/replacement required within next 10 years. Minor components or isolated sections of the attribute may need replacement or repair now, but attribute still functions safely at adequate level of service.



Acceptable physical condition – minor wear and tear, minimum risk of physical failure. No substantial deterioration anticipated over the next 5-10 years.



Acceptable physical condition – minor wear and tear, low risk of physical failure. No substantial deterioration anticipated over the next 10-15 years

0-5 Years

Acceptable

5-10 Years

Fair

10-20 Years

Good

20+ Years

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

 Immediate

Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Fairm ont Hom e 1.1

$1,349,586.80 $1,207,911.80

Architectural & Structural 1.1.1

Building Structure

$10,000.00

Foundation

Perimeter

N/A

1.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

Mechanical Room

N/A

Concrete Slab

Various

N/A

Steel deck, OWSJ’s, beams, and columns

Various

N/A

Concrete and CMU Walls

Generally good condition

Building Structure

1.1.1.4 1.1.1.6

Railings and Columns

1.1.1.7.1

Retaining Wall (1)

1.1.1.7.2

Retaining Wall (2)

1.1.1.9 1.1.1.10

Garbage Loading Area, Generator Retaining Wall Structure Generator, Behind (w est) of Building

1968

Generally good (only some w as observable), localized area @ auditorium w as rusting Fair/poor near garbage loading area, localized major rust/deterioration, some repairs required Fair condition; minor w ear and cracking observed Only observed in select locations. Generally good condition. Fireproofing of steel beams in mechanical room has been locally compromised.

1.1.1.1

1.1.1.3

1.1.2

Estimated Replacement Cost

Description

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Current Age (years)

Class

Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Year of Installation

Identification

Manufacturer

Asset Hierarchy

Condition Rating

Asset Inventory Summary Table Location

PageSunderland, 100 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

N/A

Steel

2003

Good condition, minor rusting

N/A

Concrete w alls, 3 sides, steel railing, slab on grade

2003

Wall: Good/fair - minor w ear Railing: Fair - minor rusting

North side of building

N/A

Separating sidew alk and grassed area

Good condition

Bollards

Various

N/A

Steel w ith concrete fill

Generally good

Pole Bases

Various

N/A

For light poles, flag poles, etc.

Generally fair/good, light/moderate w ear

Building Envelope

$73,900.00

Exterior Walls

Exterior / 2004 Addition

N/A

Brick Masonry

2004

Good - Overall good condition w ith localized areas of deterioration. Flashing at base of Greenhouse glazing only covers half of sill resulting in masonry staining and damage at sill joints. Stone Sill requires new flashing to provide complete coverage and repointing of the brick masonry. Investigate, clean, and repair balcony drainage at w est balcony. Lack of appropriate flashing at scupper appears to be the cause of deteriorated masonry joints. Reflashing, masonry repairs and cleaning of debris from underneath patio stones recommended pending investigation.

$3,000.00

$8,000.00

www.jlrichards.ca

AGENDA ITEM #a)

1.1.2.1

$10,000.00

PageSunderland, 101 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township Table 9: Summary of Palace Road Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 102 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township

AGENDA ITEM #a) www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 103 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township

AGENDA ITEM #a) www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 104 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Sustainable Community Hub Loyalist Township

Table 23: Summary of Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

PageSunderland, 105 of 575J. L. Richards & Associates Limit… Consultant Briefing: Jared

Building Condition Assessment Sustainable Community Hub County ofTownship Frontenac Loyalist

Thank you!

October 16th, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

October 16, 2019 Report 2019-9

Page 106 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Administrative Report

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Page 107 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

CAO Schedule •

• • • • • • •

Eastern Ontario Leadership Council meeting, September 26, County of Frontenac CUPE, September 30, Kingston MTO meeting, October 1, MTO Union Grievance Hearing October 10, Toronto OPSEU Frontenac CAO’s, October 11, County of Frontenac EOWC Meeting, October 18, Lindsay EOWC Meeting, October 21, Kingston Council Budget Presentations, October 23, 24 and 29, County of Frontenac

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 108 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Ontario Names Advisor on Public Health and Emergency Health Services Consultations Jim Pine, Chief Administrative Officer of County of Hastings and former Board of Directors of AMO to serve as advisor .

• •

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

•

Better consistency and equity of service delivery across the province; Improved clarity and alignment of roles and responsibilities between the province, Public Health Ontario and local public health; Better and deeper relationships with primary care and the broader health care system to support the goal of ending hallway health care through improved health promotion and prevention; Unlocking and promoting leading innovative practices and key strengths from across the province; and Improved public health delivery and the sustainability of the system. The government has been working with the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the City of Toronto, and with the Association of Local Public Health Agencies at technical tables since May 2019 to discuss public health modernization. The government has maintained current cost-sharing arrangements for public health and emergency health services this year. In addition, the government has increased funding by an average of nearly four per cent for land ambulance services for 2019.

Page 109 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

EOWC Updates •

EOWC Meeting – October 17/18 – City of Kawartha Lakes Review of the regional paramedic Eastern Ontario Situational Overview report First discussion of the 2020 EOWC budget Preparation for ROMA conference Affordable housing update EORN Update EOLC Update

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 110 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

EOLC launches 2019 Refresh of Regional Economic Strategy The Eastern Ontario Leadership Council (EOLC) officially launched the “refreshed” version and the implementation plans for the Eastern Ontario Economic Development Strategy. The implementation plans unveiled at the OEMC Conference represent the three foundational pillars and priorities of the Strategy – Workforce Development and Deployment; Technology Integration and Innovation; and Integrated, Intelligent Transportation Systems – as well as a new, fourth priority, Digital Infrastructure.

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

These implementations plans will guide the EOLC’s work through 2024 and allow for project development funding to the three working groups.

Page 111 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Ministry Surveying Municipalities on Gas Tax Fund The Association of Municipalities Ontario ( AMO) reported that the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) is surveying local governments to help determine how well the Ontario Gas Tax is meeting the needs of expanding and improving municipal transit. The Ministry is seeking feedback on: • The municipal own source funding cap • The allocation formula • Baseline funding requirements • Local/Regional Gas Tax funding allocations Funding for Ontario’s Gas Tax Program is determined by the number of litres of gasoline sold in the province and provides municipalities with two cents per litre of provincial gas tax revenues. This funding must be used towards public transit capital and/or operating expenditures at their discretion. The provincial government earlier this year also announced that the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) will be reviewed and redesigned. OCIF currently provides funding to support core infrastructure projects, such as roads and bridges, to rural and northern municipalities, as well as municipalities with 100,000 or fewer residents .

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

http://www.amo.on.ca/AMO -PDFs/Reports/2019/Ontario -Dedicated-Gas-Tax-Funds-for-PublicTranspo.aspx

Page 112 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

AMO •

AMO provided a submission to the Ministry of Health about proposed regulation changes to enable new models of care for select 9-1-1 patients which will affect municipal Paramedic Services.

•

AMO and the Continuous Improvement Fund (CIF) is hosting a series of in-person meetings in October and November on Blue Box.

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 113 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

AMO Provincial Matters MNRF announced a consultation on changes to the Aggregates Resources Act which ends November 4, 2019

•

Changes to the Construction Act are in force as of October 1, 2019

•

Ministry of Long-Term Care extended the timelines for funding changes while exploring alternatives, the government is also opening up an application process for new long -term care bed expansion. The deadline for applications is January 17, 2020.

•

Ontario’s Job Site Challenge is coming - Canada’s first mega site program specifically created to attract large scale advanced manufacturing investment projects to the province.

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

•

Page 114 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

AMCTO Policy Updates Regulations Passed Amending Schedule 12 of Bill 108: Regulations amending Schedule 12 of Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, came into effect after 30 days of open consultations and review by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Committee Proposes Changes to AODA Standards: The Information and Communications Standards Development Committee is proposing changes to accessibility standards under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. Minister Clark Receives Regional Government Review Report: Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark received the regional governance review report but reiterated that the report will be treated as confidential advice to Cabinet.

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Government Launches P3 Infrastructure Investment: Ontario’s Minister of Infrastructure, Laurie Scott, announced the Ministry’s annual Market Update, which confirms the Government’s plan to invest in public -private partnership (P3) infrastructure projects

Page 115 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Congratulations Deputy Chief Heather Edward

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Deputy Chief Heather Edward received the Richard J. Armstrong Leadership Award at the Ontario Association of Paramedic Chiefs annual gala in Windsor on September 26, 2019

Page 116 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

15 th Annual Christmas Sale at Fairmount Home November 26, 2019, 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in Auditorium

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 117 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Communications Update Highlights • Media relations during stabbing/shooting down town. Calls from local media and CBC, CTV • Assisted Ontario Association of Paramedic Chiefs (OAPC) with their social media during its fall education summit • 2019 Open Farms Instagram posts reached 9,194 users and tweets had 23,684 impressions • Reached 1,000 followers on Instagram Website traffic August • www.frontenaccounty.ca • www.infrontenac.ca • www.frontenacmaps.ca

17,863 page views 13,384 page views 5,383 page views

Social media audience on September 30

Increase since Aug 31

3,802 2,420 1,040 4,495 544 937 13,238 200 followers

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

County Facebook County Twitter County Instagram FPS Twitter Fairmount Home Facebook Howe Island Ferry Twitter

Page 118 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Taste of Wolfe Island Farm to Table Dinner & Tour Saturday, October 5 Nearly 50 people participated in the event:

3 farm tours: de Ruiter Beef, Pykeview Meadows, Henderson Farm

Very successful collaboration involving many stakeholders

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Locally-sourced meal at the General W olfe included 20+ local producers from the island, Frontenac and Kingston.

Page 119 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

The final stretch of the Frontenac K&P Trail between Tichborne and Sharbot Lake is now complete.

Trail users are delighted!

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 120 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Planning Update 8

Department Highlights September 7

7 6 5 4 3

2 1

0 North Frontenac

0 Central Frontenac

Committee of Adjustment

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Frontenac Islands

Township Council

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Nicole Goodbrand joined the planning team to implement LEAN!
Presentation and attendance at Ontario Association of Committee of Adjustments
Manager attended OPPI in Toronto
Population projection and allocations draft received
Successful LPAT decision for Township of Central Frontenac

Page 121 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Regional Roads Update Regional Roads Network

Project Charter Project Phases October

October

Project Initiation

Current State Review • Documentation Review • Stakeholder Interviews

December

Analysis

Final Report

• Delivery model options analysis • Lennox & Addington Interviews and review • 5 year pro-forma budget for each option • Working session with Project Team to select delivery model

• Half day working session with Project Team • Final business case and implementation plan for preferred delivery model • Presentation to Councils

AGENDA ITEM #b)

• Kick Off Meeting • Project Charter/Plan • Schedule and Milestones • Communication / Engagement Plan

November

Page 122 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Staff Updates

• United Way 2019 Workplace Campaign – County of Frontenac Goal is $7000 • Lean Yellow Belt Training December 2, 3 and 4. at the County of Frontenac

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

Page 123 of 575Officer, will provide Council wi… Mr. Kelly Pender , Chief Administrative

Budget 2020

Budget Presentations October 23, 24 and 29, 2019 County of Frontenac Frontenac Room AGENDA ITEM #b)

Administrative Report, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

October 16, 2019 Report 2019-124

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 124 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Bill 108 – Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act Amendments

•

May 2, 2019 – Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing released “More Homes, More Choice: Ontario’s Housing Supply Action Plan”. As part of this, Bill 108 – More Homes, More Choice Act was tabled.

•

June 6, 2019 – Bill 108 received Royal Assent with only minor amendments. Introduced 13 statues with the intention of cutting red tape, reducing costs, and increasing the supply of housing.

•

September 3, 2019 – the Province proclaimed key amendments to the Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017.

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 125 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Background

•

Reducing decision timelines: Official Plans from 7 months (210 days) to 4 months (120 days) Zoning Bylaw Amendments from 5 months (150 days) to 3 months (90 days) Plan of Subdivision/Condominium from 6 months (180 days) to 4 months (120 days)

•

Authorizing additional residential units for detached, semidetached and row housing in both the primary dwelling and the ancillary structure.

•

Enabling the Minister to require the community planning permit system to be used in specified areas (e.g. major transit station areas or employment zones)

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 126 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Planning Act Amendments

•

Empowering LPAT to make its decision based on best planning outcome, rather than limiting to the consistency or conformity with higher order planning documents.

•

Enabling LPAT to make final determination on appeals rather than a recommendation back to Council.

•

Limiting the examination of a witness if the Tribunal is satisfied that all relevant matters have been addressed.

•

Limiting their party appeals of Plans of Subdivision/Condominium and approval authority nondecisions Official Plans and Official Plan Amendments

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 127 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act Amendments

•

Subject to subsection (43), not later than 20 days after the day that the giving of notice under subsection (37) is completed, any of the following may appeal the decision, the lapsing provision or any of the conditions to the Tribunal by filing with the approval authority a notice of appeal that must set out the reasons for the appeal, accompanied by the fee charged under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017:

The applicant.
A public body that, before the approval authority made its decision, made oral submissions at a public meeting or written submissions to the approval authority. 2.1 A person listed in subsection (48.3) who, before the approval authority made its decision, made oral submissions at a public meeting or written submissions to the approval authority.
The Minister.
The municipality in which the land is located or the planning board in whose planning area the land is located.

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 128 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Restricting Third Party Appeals, Section 39

•

“Public Body” means a municipality, a local board, a ministry, department, board, commission, agency or official of a provincial or federal government or a First Nation

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 129 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Restricting Third Party Appeals

• • • •

• •

•

A corporation operating an electric utility in the local municipality or planning area to which the plan of subdivision would apply.
Ontario Power Generation Inc.
Hydro One Inc.
A company operating a natural gas utility in the local municipality or planning area to which the plan of subdivision would apply.
A company operating an oil or natural gas pipeline in the local municipality or planning area to which the plan of subdivision would apply.
A person required to prepare a risk and safety management plan in respect of an operation under Ontario Regulation 211/01 (Propane Storage and Handling) made under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000, if any part of the distance established as the hazard distance applicable to the operation and referenced in the risk and safety management plan is within the area to which the plan of subdivision would apply.
A company operating a railway line any part of which is located within 300 metres of any part of the area to which the plan of subdivision would apply.
A company operating as a telecommunication infrastructure provider in the area to which the plan of subdivision would apply. 2019, c. 9, Sched. 12, s. 14 (8).

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 130 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Restricting Third Party Appeals, Section 48.3

Ontario Regulation 303/19

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 131 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Transition for Planning Act Appeals

•

• • •

LEAN Process Improvement Exercise – Spread beyond Committee of Adjustment processes once control phase has been implemented Implications to staff capacity will be monitored Removal of requirement for Councils to “make a new decision” Community Benefits Charge – Implications for parkland dedication regime and development charges

Bill 108 – Planning, Frontenac County Council, October 16, 2019

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Page 132 ofof575 Ms. Megan Rueckwald , Manager Community Planning, will brief Council …

Implications for Frontenac

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Report 2019-118 Recommend Report to Council To:

Warden and Council Members of the County of Frontenac

From:

Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Corporate Services – Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule

Recommendation Resolved That Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Corporate Services – Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule report; And Further That a by-law be introduced later in the meeting to adopt the 2020 Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule. Background The County of Frontenac establishes its fees and fares schedule for the FrontenacHowe Islander Ferry operation annually. The ferry links the west end of Howe Island with the mainland at Kingston. The County has, in past discussions, indicated that the operation of the ferry should not be a financial burden to the County. Within this philosophical framework, there are a number of ways to realize the municipal funding through different fees and fares scenarios. The agreement between the County of Frontenac and the Ministry of Transportation allows for a ferry revenue reserve to be maintained up to 5% of the current operating expenditures. A structure for fees and fares was instated beginning in 2005 which standardized the rates charged for both the Township Ferry and the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry and created a common revenue account. At that time, the pass price was reduced and the

133 of 575 2019-118 Corporate Page Services Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ticket price increased. Having utilized this formula since 2005, it appears to meet the required contributions of both the Township and the County to the ferry operations. Comment The 2020 pass is again proposed to provide access to both the County and the Township ferries and the common fee structure for the Township and the County ferries is also proposed to continue. 2020 Fees and Fares Staff propose that fees should only be collected when vehicles are coming on to Howe Island from either ferry. In 2013 an exemption was provided for all vehicles identified as undertaking business for the Township of Frontenac Islands. No other major change is suggested in the overall principles currently in place for the fees and fares. The County and the Township will continue to make available temporary passes to provide for short term requirements, which can be arranged at the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry office or the Township of Frontenac Islands’ municipal office on Howe Island. The discounted tickets to provide to visiting friends and family will be continued in 2020. One book of 10 tickets will be sold per pass holder for a price of $45.00 to accommodate this requirement. It is proposed that the pass price increase by $5 for a total cost of $265 and the one additional annual pass for a single vehicle per household increase by $4 for a total cost of $70, so the cost of the pass and the fees are as follows: Annual pass for a single vehicle One additional annual pass for a single vehicle per household ** Two way trip for single vehicle Two way trip for single vehicle with trailer in tow Additional charges for annual pass holder with trailer in tow Two way trip for any heavy vehicle Replacement fee per annual pass (Charged for every replacement)

$265.00
$70.00 $6.00 $15.00 $6.00 $15.00 $25.00

Definitions Single Vehicle Single vehicle will include a car, motorcycle, van, SUV, or pickup truck. Heavy Vehicle Any vehicle greater than 6,000 kgs and/or 7 metres (23 feet).

These fees will be discounted by 10% for applicants who can show documentation indicating they are 65 years of age or older during 2020. Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – 2020 Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule October 16, 2019

134 of 575 2019-118 Corporate Page Services Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares…

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #a)

** A second pass for $70.00 will only be available if the second vehicle involved is registered to: 

The same individual who purchased the first full-price 2020 annual pass;



An individual who is married to or is in a common-law relationship with the fullprice 2020 annual pass purchaser;



The dependent child of a full-price 2020 annual pass purchaser or the fullprice pass purchaser’s married or common-law spouse who is under the age of 18;



The dependent child of a full-price 2020 annual pass purchaser or the fullprice pass purchaser’s married or common-law spouse who is over the age of 18, only if the dependent child has both the same permanent address as the full-price 2020 annual pass purchaser and is attending school full-time.

Documentation must be provided that satisfies the staff person issuing the passes. A third pass at a reduced rate is not available. 

Township of Frontenac Islands’ vehicles and vehicles which, through previous notification, the Township of Frontenac Islands identifies as undertaking Township business are exempted.

A memorandum of understanding addressing the details of this arrangement has been executed to address the sharing of revenues between the County and the Township. The Council of the Township of Frontenac Islands will also consider this schedule of fees and fares at its meeting on October 15, 2019 and staff will advise if the recommended direction was approved. Financial Implications Under its agreement with the Ministry of Transportation, the County can reserve up to 5% of operating expense in a reserve to mitigate ferry revenue fluctuations. The proposed increase is in line with the increased costs anticipated for the service in 2020. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected D. Plumley, CAO, Township of Frontenac Islands S. Kerr, Deputy Treasurer, Township of Frontenac Islands

Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – 2020 Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares Schedule October 16, 2019

135 of 575 2019-118 Corporate Page Services Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares…

Page 3 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Report 2019-119 Recommend Report to Council To:

Warden and Members of County Council

From:

Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Corporate Services – Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms

Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Corporate Services – Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms report; And Further That the Council of the County of Frontenac endorse the report and its recommendations, those being:

The provincial government adopt a model of full proportionate liability to replace joint and several liability.
Implement enhancements to the existing limitations period including the continued applicability of the existing 10-day rule on slip and fall cases given recent judicial interpretations, and whether a 1-year limitation period may be beneficial.
Implement a cap for economic loss awards.
Increase the catastrophic impairment default benefit limit to $2 million and increase the third-party liability coverage to $2 million in government regulated automobile insurance plans.
Assess and implement additional measures which would support lower premiums or alternatives to the provision of insurance services by other entities such as non-profit insurance reciprocals.
Compel the insurance industry to supply all necessary financial evidence including premiums, claims, and deductible limit changes which support its, and municipal arguments as to the fiscal impact of joint and several liability.
Establish a provincial and municipal working group to consider the above and put forward recommendations to the Attorney General.

136 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

And Further That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Honourable Doug Downey, Attorney General of Ontario and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). Background On July 12, 2019 following an initial announcement made at the annual Rural Ontario Municipalities Association (ROMA), Attorney General Doug Downey wrote to the province’s municipalities regarding joint and several liability consultations. The consultations were open until September 27, 2019 with the Attorney General welcoming delegations and written submissions. Comment On September 27, 2019 the AMO Board approved a submission on joint and several liability entitled, “A Reasonable Balance: Addressing growing municipal liability and insurance costs.” AMO President Jamie McGarvey forwarded the report to the Attorney General, The Honourable Doug Downey for consideration. AMO is encouraging municipal councils to endorse the report and its recommendations. The Ministry of the Attorney General has agreed to accept municipal resolutions up until November 1, 2019. A copy of the AMO submission is attached to this report as Appendix A. The report includes seven key recommendations on actions which the government could take to reduce the negative impact of joint and several liability on municipalities. It builds on previous reports and reasserts key issues from AMO’s 2010 paper, AMO’s 2011 insurance cost survey, provides more recent examples, and details some possible solutions of which there are many options. The paper in no way intends for aggrieved parties to be denied justice or damages through the courts. Rather it seeks to highlight the inequity of how much “deep pocket” defendants like municipalities are forced to pay, for both in and out of court settlements, how unfair it is to ask property taxpayers to carry the lion’s share of a damage award when a municipality is found at minimal fault or to assume responsibility for someone else’s mistake. It points out how municipal governments cannot afford to be the insurer of last resort. In addition, the report notes that the principle of joint and several liability is costing municipalities and taxpayers dearly, in the form of rising insurance premiums, service reductions and fewer choices. The Negligence Act was never intended to place the burden of being an insurer of last resort on municipalities; however joint and several liability ensures just that. In August, 2019, AMCTO President Dean Sauriol discussed the issue of Joint and Several Liability with the Attorney General in a delegation at the annual AMO Conference, as well noting that litigation against local governments has increased significantly and that Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms October 16, 2019 Page 2 of 3

137 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

municipalities have had to divert public money to support these costs, even when the municipal share of liability is as low as 1%. President Sauriol called the Attorney General’s attention to AMCTO’s support for reform in each of the last three pre-budget submissions - including in 2019, when AMCTO committed to “engage in coalition-building efforts with peer associations to pursue a remedy” and advocate in favour of a more appropriate system for assigning liability. AMCTO has written to the Attorney General expressing its support for the Task Force’s recommendations and on October 4, 2019, issued an Advocacy Update on Joint and Several Liability to its membership, that it is lending its support to AMO’s Task Force Report on reforming Ontario’s joint and several liability system. Strategic Priority Implications Priority 3 - Champion and coordinate collaborative efforts with partners to resolve complex problems otherwise beyond the reach of their individual mandates and jurisdictions. The County will provide leadership in coordinating joint action with townships, the City of Kingston and other partners to develop solutions to complex problems otherwise beyond the reach of their individual formal mandates and jurisdictions. Specific Objectives in support of this strategy: 3.3 Continue to pursue collaborative opportunities to achieve service and cost efficiencies and other economies through cost-sharing and shared services. Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Association of Municipalities of Ontario Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario

Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – Support of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Submission to the Attorney General on Liability and Insurance Cost Reforms October 16, 2019 Page 3 of 3

138 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Towards a Reasonable Balance: Addressing growing municipal liability and insurance costs Submission to the Attorney General of Ontario October 1, 2019

139 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Table of Contents Letter to the Attorney General of Ontario……………………………………………………………………………… 3 Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Insurance Cost Examples……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Joint and Several in Action - Recent Examples ……………………………………………………………………….. 9 Joint and Several Liability in Action - Other notable cases …………………………………………………… 11 2011 Review of Joint and Several Liability – Law Commission of Ontario …………………………….. 11 2014 Resolution by the Ontario Legislature and Review by the Attorney General ……………….. 12 Options for Reform – The Legal Framework …………………………………………………………………………. 13 The Saskatchewan Experience ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 15 Insurance Related Reforms ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18

140 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Sent via email to: doug.downeyco@pc.ola.org magpolicy@ontario.ca October 1, 2019 The Honourable Doug Downey Attorney General of Ontario McMurtry-Scott Building, 11th Floor 720 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 2S9 Dear Attorney General Downey, Municipal governments accept the responsibility to pay their fair share of a loss. Always. Making it right and paying a fair share are the cornerstones of our legal system. Citizens expect nothing less of their local governments. But what is a challenge for municipalities and property taxpayers alike, is being asked to assume someone else’s responsibility for someone else’s mistake. Municipal governments should not be the insurer of last resort. For municipalities in Ontario, however, the principle of joint and several liability ensures that they are just that. Joint and several liability means higher insurance costs. It diverts property tax dollars from delivering public services. It has transformed municipalities into litigation targets while others escape responsibility. It forces municipal government to settle out-of-court for excessive amounts when responsibility is as low as 1%. There must be a better way. There must be a better way to help ensure those who suffer losses are made whole again without asking municipalities to bear that burden alone. There must be a better way to be fair, reasonable, and responsible. AMO welcomes the government’s commitment to review joint and several liability. It is a complex issue that has many dimensions. Issues of fairness, legal principles, “liability chill”, insurance failures and high insurance costs are all intertwined. Many other jurisdictions have offered additional protection for municipalities and AMO calls on the Ontario government to do the same. What follows is a starting point for that discussion. Our paper reasserts key issues from AMO’s 2010 paper, AMO’s 2011 insurance cost survey, provides more recent examples, and details some possible solutions of which there are many options. Municipalities are in the business of delivering public services. Municipal governments exist to connect people and to advance the development of a community. It is time to find a reasonable balance to prevent the further scaling back of public services owing to joint and several liability, “liability chill”, or excessive insurance costs.

141 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Together with the provincial government, I am confident we can find a better way. Sincerely,

Jamie McGarvey AMO President

142 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Executive Summary AMO’s advocacy efforts on joint and several liability in no way intends for aggrieved parties to be denied justice or damages through the courts. Rather, municipal governments seek to highlight the inequity of how much “deep pocket” defendants like municipalities are forced to pay, for both in and out of court settlements. It is entirely unfair to ask property taxpayers to carry the lion’s share of a damage award when a municipality is found at minimal fault or to assume responsibility for someone else’s mistake. Municipal governments cannot afford to be the insurer of last resort. The principle of joint and several liability is costing municipalities and taxpayers dearly, in the form of rising insurance premiums, service reductions and fewer choices. The Negligence Act was never intended to place the burden of insurer of last resort on municipalities. As public organizations with taxation power and “deep pockets,” municipalities have become focal points for litigation when other defendants do not have the means to pay. At the same time, catastrophic claim awards in Ontario have increased considerably. In part, joint and several liability is fueling exorbitant increases in municipal insurance premiums. The heavy insurance burden and legal environment is unsustainable for Ontario’s communities. Despite enormous improvements to safety, including new standards for playgrounds, pool safety, and better risk management practices, municipal insurance premiums and liability claims continue to increase. All municipalities have risk management policies to one degree or another and most large municipalities now employ risk managers precisely to increase health and safety and limit liability exposure in the design of facilities, programs, and insurance coverage. Liability is a top of mind consideration for all municipal councils. Joint and several liability is problematic not only because of the disproportioned burden on municipalities that are awarded by courts. It is also the immeasurable impact of propelling municipalities to settle out of court to avoid protracted and expensive litigation for amounts that may be excessive, or certainly represent a greater percentage than their degree of fault. Various forms of proportionate liability have now been enacted by all of Ontario’s competing Great Lakes states. In total, 38 other states south of the border have adopted proportionate liability in specific circumstances to the benefit of municipalities. Many common law jurisdictions around the world have adopted legal reforms to limit the exposure and restore balance. With other Commonwealth jurisdictions and the majority of state governments in the United States having modified the rule of joint and several liability in favour of some form of proportionate liability, it is time for Ontario to consider various options. There is precedence in Ontario for joint and several liability reform. The car leasing lobby highlighted a particularly expensive court award made in November of 2004 against a car leasing company by the victim of a drunk driver. The August 1997 accident occurred when the car skidded off a county road near Peterborough, Ontario. It exposed the inequity of joint and several liability for car leasing companies. The leasing companies argued to the government that the settlement had put them at a competitive disadvantage to lenders. They also warned that such liability conditions would likely drive some leasing and rental companies to reduce their business in Ontario. As a result, Bill 18 amended the Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act, the Highway Traffic

143 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Act and the Ontario Insurance Act to make renters and lessees vicariously liable for the negligence of automobile drivers and capped the maximum liability of owners of rental and leased cars at $1 million. While Bill 18 has eliminated the owners of leased and rented cars as “deep pocket” defendants, no such restrictions have been enacted to assist municipalities.

A 2011 survey conducted by AMO reveals that since 2007, liability premiums have increased by 22.2% and are among the fastest growing municipal costs. Total 2011 Ontario municipal insurance costs were $155.2 million. Liability premiums made up the majority of these expenses at $85.5 million. Property taxpayers are paying this price. These trends are continuing. In August of 2019, it was reported the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury faces a 59% insurance cost increase for 2019. This is just one example. AMO encourages the municipal insurance industry to provide the government with more recent data and trends to support the industry’s own arguments regarding the impact joint and several has on premiums. Insurance costs disproportionately affect small municipalities. For 2011, the per capita insurance costs for communities with populations under 10,000 were $37.56. By comparison, per capita costs in large communities with populations over 75,000 were $7.71. Property taxpayers in one northern community are spending more on insurance than their library. In one southern county, for every $2 spent on snowplowing roads, another $1 is spent on insurance. In 2016, the Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange (OMEX), a not-for-profit insurer, announced that it was suspending reciprocal underwriting operations. The organization cited, a “low pricing environment, combined with the impact of joint and several liability on municipal claim settlements” as reasons for the decision. Fewer choices fuels premium increases. Learning from other jurisdictions is important for Ontario. The Province of Saskatchewan has implemented liability reforms to support its municipalities. As a municipal lawyer at the time, Neil Robertson, QC was instrumental in laying out the arguments in support of these changes. Now a Justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan, AMO was pleased to have Neil Robertson prepare a paper and address AMO conference delegates in 2013. Much of the Saskatchewan municipal experience (which led to reforms) is applicable to the Ontario and the Canadian municipal context. Summarised below and throughout this paper are some of Robertson’s key findings. Robertson found that, regardless of the cause, over the years municipalities in Canada have experienced an accelerating rate of litigation and an increase in amounts of damage awards. He noted these developments challenge municipalities and raise financial, operational and policy issues in the provision of public services. Robertson describes the current Canadian legal climate as having placed municipalities in the role of involuntary insurer. Courts have assigned municipal liability where liability was traditionally denied and apportioned fault to municipal defendants out of proportion to municipal involvement in the actual wrong. This increased exposure to liability has had serious ramifications for municipalities, both as a deterrent to providing public services which may give rise to claims and in raising the cost and reducing the availability of insurance. The cost of claims has caused insurers to reconsider not only

144 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

what to charge for premiums, but whether to continue offering insurance coverage to municipal clients. Robertson also makes the key point that it reasonable for municipal leaders to seek appropriate statutory protections. He wrote: “Since municipalities exist to improve the quality of life for their citizens, the possibility of causing harm to those same citizens is contrary to its fundamental mission. Careful management and wise stewardship of public resources by municipal leaders will reduce the likelihood of such harm, including adherence to good risk management practices in municipal operations. But wise stewardship also involves avoiding the risk of unwarranted costs arising from inevitable claims.” And, of course, a key consideration is the reality that insurance premiums, self-insurance costs, and legal fees divert municipal funds from other essential municipal services and responsibilities. It is in this context that AMO appreciated the commitments made by the Premier and the Attorney General to review the principle of joint and several liability, the impact it has on insurance costs, and the influence “liability chill” has on the delivery of public services. Now is the time to deliver provincial public policy solutions which address these issues.

Recommendations AMO recommends the following measures to address these issues:

The provincial government adopt a model of full proportionate liability to replace joint and several liability.
Implement enhancements to the existing limitations period including the continued applicability of the existing 10-day rule on slip and fall cases given recent judicial interpretations, and whether a 1-year limitation period may be beneficial.
Implement a cap for economic loss awards.
Increase the catastrophic impairment default benefit limit to $2 million and increase the third-party liability coverage to $2 million in government regulated automobile insurance plans.
Assess and implement additional measures which would support lower premiums or alternatives to the provision of insurance services by other entities such as non-profit insurance reciprocals.
Compel the insurance industry to supply all necessary financial evidence including premiums, claims, and deductible limit changes which support its, and municipal arguments as to the fiscal impact of joint and several liability.
Establish a provincial and municipal working group to consider the above and put forward recommendations to the Attorney General.

145 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Insurance Cost Examples The government has requested detailed information from municipalities regarding their insurance costs, coverage, deductibles, claims history, and out-of-court settlements. Municipalities have been busy responding to a long list of provincial consultations on a wide range of topics. Some of the information being sought is more easily supplied by the insurance industry. AMO’s 2011 survey of insurance costs produced a sample size of 122 municipalities and assessed insurance cost increases over a five-year period. The survey revealed an average premium increase which exceeded 20% over that period. All of the same forces remain at play in 2019 just as they were in 2011. Below are some key examples. Ear Falls - The Township of Ear Falls reports that its insurance premiums have increased 30% over five years to $81,686. With a population of only 995 residents (2016), this represents a per capita cost of $82.09. This amount is a significant increase from AMO’s 2011 Insurance Survey result. At that time, the average per capita insurance cost for a community with a population under 10,000 was $37.56. While the Township has not been the subject of a liability claim, a claim in a community of this size could have significant and long-lasting financial and service implications. The Township has also had to impose stricter insurance requirements on groups that rent municipal facilities. This has had a negative impact on the clubs and volunteers’ groups and as a consequence, many have cut back on the service these groups provide to the community. Central Huron – For many years the municipality of Central Huron had a deductible of $5,000. In 2014, the deductible was increased to $15,000 to help reduce insurance costs. The municipality also increased its liability coverage in 2014 and added cyber security coverage in 2018. The combined impact of these changes represents a premium cost of $224,774 in 2019, up from $141,331 in 2010. Per capita costs for insurance alone are now $29.67. Huntsville – Since 2010, the Town of Huntsville reports an insurance premium increase of 67%. In 2019 this represented about 3.75% of the town’s property tax levy. At the same time, Huntsville’s deductible has increased from $10,000 to $25,000. The town also reports a reluctance to hold its own events for fear of any claims which may affect its main policy. Additional coverage is purchased for these events and these costs are not included above. Ottawa - In August 2018, the City began working with its insurance broker, Aon Risk Solutions (“Aon”), to prepare for the anticipated renewal of the Integrated Insurance Program in April 2019. As the cost of the City’s insurance premiums had risen by approximately 25% between 2017 and 2018, this early work was intended to ensure that any further increase could be properly accounted for through the 2019 budget process. Early indications of a possible further 10% premium increase prompted the City and Aon in late 2018 to explore options for a revised Program, and to approach alternative markets for the supply of insurance. On January 11, 2019, an OC Transpo bus collided with a section of the Westboro Station transit shelter, resulting in three fatalities and numerous serious injuries. This was the second major incident involving the City’s bus fleet, following approximately five years after the OC Transpo – VIA train collision in September 2013.

146 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

The January 2019 incident prompted insurance providers to re-evaluate their willingness to participate in the City Program. Despite Aon’s work to secure an alternative provider, only Frank Cowan Company (“Cowan”), the City’s existing insurer, was prepared to offer the City an Integrated Insurance Program. Cowan’s offer to renew the City’s Program was conditional on revised terms and limits and at a significant premium increase of approximately 84%, or nearly $2.1 million per year. According to Cowan, these changes and increases were attributable to seven principle factors, including Joint and Several Liability: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

Escalating Costs of Natural Global Disasters; Joint and Several Liability; Claims Trends (in the municipal sector); Increasing Damage Awards; Class Action Lawsuits; New and/or Adverse Claims Development; and, Transit Exposure.

Cowan also indicated that the primary policy limits for the 2019-2020 renewal would be lowered from $25 million to $10 million per occurrence, thereby raising the likelihood of increased costs for the City’s excess liability policies.

Joint and Several in Action - Recent Examples The following examples highlight joint and several in action. The following examples have occurred in recent years. GTA Municipality – A homeowner rented out three separate apartments in a home despite being zoned as a single-family dwelling. After a complaint was received, bylaw inspectors and Fire Prevention Officers visited the property. The landlord was cautioned to undertake renovations to restore the building into a single-family dwelling. After several months of non-compliance, charges under the fire code were laid. The owner was convicted and fined. A subsequent visit by Fire Prevention Officers noted that the required renovations had not taken place. Tragically, a fire occurred which resulted in three fatalities. Despite having undertaken corrective action against the homeowner, joint and several liability loomed large. It compelled the municipality to make a payment of $504,000 given the 1% rule. City of Ottawa - A serious motor vehicle accident occurred between one of the City’s buses and an SUV. The collision occurred at an intersection when the inebriated driver of the SUV failed to stop at a red light and was struck by the City bus. This collision resulted in the deaths of the SUV driver and two other occupants, and also seriously injured the primary Plaintiff, the third passenger in the SUV. The secondary action was brought by the family of one of the deceased passengers. The Court ultimately concluded that the City was 20% liable for the collision, while the SUV driver was 80% at fault. Despite the 80/20 allocation of fault, the City was required to pay all of the approximately $2.1 million in damages awarded in the primary case and the $200,000 awarded in the secondary case, bringing the amount paid by the City to a total that was not proportionate to its actual liability. This was due to the application of the principle of joint and several liability, as well as the interplay between the various automobile insurance policies held by the SUV owner and

147 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

passengers, which is further explained below. Although the City appealed this case, the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed with the findings of the trial judge and dismissed it. This case was notable for the implications of various factors on the insurance policies held by the respective parties. While most automobile insurance policies in Ontario provide for $1 million in third party liability coverage, the insurance for the SUV was reduced to the statutory minimum of $200,000 by virtue of the fact that the driver at the time of the collision had a blood alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit for a fully licensed driver. This was contrary to the requirements of his G2 license, which prohibit driving after the consumption of any alcohol. Further, while the Plaintiff passengers’ own respective insurance provided $1 million in coverage for underinsured motorists (as the SUV driver was at the time), this type of coverage is triggered only where no other party is in any way liable for the accident. As a result, the primary Plaintiff could only effectively recover the full $2.1 million in damages if the Court attributed even a small measure of fault to another party with sufficient resources to pay the claim. In determining that the City was at least partially responsible for the collision, the Court held that the speed of the bus – which according to GPS recordings was approximately 6.5 km/h over the posted limit of 60 kilometres an hour – and momentary inattention were contributing factors to the collision. To shorten the length of the trial by approximately one week and accordingly reduce the legal costs involved, the parties had earlier reached an agreement on damages and that the findings regarding the primary Plaintiff would apply equally to the other. The amount of the agreement-upon damages took into account any contributory negligence on the part of the respective Plaintiffs, attributable to such things as not wearing a seat belt. City of Ottawa, 2nd example – A Plaintiff was catastrophically injured when, after disembarking a City bus, he was struck by a third-party motor vehicle. The Plaintiff’s injuries included a brain injury while his impairments included incomplete quadriplegia. As a result of his accident, the Plaintiff brought a claim for damages for an amount in excess of $7 million against the City and against the owner and driver of the third-party vehicle that struck him. Against the City, the Plaintiff alleged that the roadway was not properly designed and that the bus stop was placed at an unsafe location as it required passengers to cross the road mid-block and not at a controlled intersection. Following the completion of examinations for discovery, the Plaintiff’s claim against the CoDefendant (the driver of the vehicle which struck the plaintiff) was resolved for $1,120,000 comprising $970,000 for damages and $120,000 for costs. The Co-Defendant’s policy limit was $1 million. The claim against the City was in effect, a “1% rule” case where the City had been added to the case largely because the Co-Defendant’s insurance was capped at $1 million, which was well below the value of the Plaintiff’s claim. On the issue of liability, the pre-trial judge was of the view that the City was exposed to a finding of some liability against it on the theory that, because of the proximity of the bus stop to a home for adults with mental health issues, the City knew or should have known that bus passengers with cognitive and/or physical disabilities would be crossing mid-block at an unmarked crossing. This, according to the judge, could have resulted in a finding being made at trial that the City should

148 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

either have removed the bus stop or alternatively, should have installed a pedestrian crossing at this location. The judge assessed the Plaintiff’s damages at $7,241,000 exclusive of costs and disbursements which he then reduced to $4,602,930 exclusive of costs and disbursements after applying a reduction of 27.5% for contributory negligence and subtracting the $970,000 payment made by the Co-Defendant’s insurer. Settlement discussions took place and the judge recommended that the matter be resolved for $3,825,000 plus costs of $554,750 plus HST plus disbursements.

Joint and Several Liability in Action - Other notable cases Deering v Scugog - A 19-year-old driver was driving at night in a hurry to make the start time of a movie. She was travelling on a Class 4 rural road that had no centerline markings. The Ontario Traffic Manual does not require this type of road to have such a marking. The driver thought that a vehicle travelling in the opposite direction was headed directly at her. She swerved, over-corrected and ended up in a rock culvert. The Court found the Township of Scugog 66.7% liable. The at-fault driver only carried a $1M auto insurance policy. Ferguson v County of Brant - An inexperienced 17-year-old male driver was speeding on a road when he failed to navigate a curve which resulted in him crossing the lane into oncoming traffic, leaving the roadway, and striking a tree. The municipality was found to have posted a winding road sign rather than a sharp curve sign. The municipality was found 55% liable. Safranyos et al v City of Hamilton - The plaintiff was leaving a drive-in movie theatre with four children in her vehicle at approximately 1 AM. She approached a stop sign with the intention of turning right onto a highway. Although she saw oncoming headlights she entered the intersection where she was struck by a vehicle driven 15 km/h over the posted speed limit by a man who had just left a party and was determined by toxicologists to be impaired. The children in the plaintiff’s vehicle suffered significant injuries. The City was determined to be 25% liable because a stop line had not been painted on the road at the intersection. Mortimer v Cameron - Two men were engaged in horseplay on a stairway and one of them fell backward through an open door at the bottom of a landing. The other man attempted to break the first man’s fall and together they fell into an exterior wall that gave way. Both men fell 10 feet onto the ground below, one of whom was left quadriplegic. The trial judge determined both men were negligent, but that their conduct did not correspond to the extent of the plaintiff’s injuries. No liability was attached to either man. The building owner was determined to be 20% and the City of London was found to be 80% liable. The Court awarded the plaintiff $5 M in damages. On appeal, the City’s liability was reduced to 40% and building owner was determined to be 60% liable. The City still ended up paying 80% of the overall claim.

2011 Review of Joint and Several Liability – Law Commission of Ontario In February 2011 the Law Commission of Ontario released a report entitled, “Joint and Several Liability Under the Ontario Business Corporations Act”. This review examined the application of

149 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

joint and several liability to corporate law and more specifically the relationship between the corporation and its directors, officers, shareholders and stakeholders. Prior to the report’s release, AMO made a submission to the Law Commission of Ontario to seek to expand its review to include municipal implications. The Law Commission did not proceed with a broader review at that time, but the context of its narrower scope remains applicable to municipalities. In fact, many of the same arguments which support reform in the realm of the Business Corporations Act, are the same arguments which apply to municipal governments. Of note, the Law Commission’s 1 report highlighted the following in favour of reforms: Fairness: “it is argued that it is unfair for a defendant, whose degree of fault is minor when compared to that of other defendants, to have to fully compensate a plaintiff should the other defendants be insolvent or unavailable.” Deep Pocket Syndrome: “Joint and several liability encourages plaintiffs to unfairly target defendants who are known or perceived to be insured or solvent.” Rising Costs of Litigation, Insurance, and Damage Awards: “Opponents of the joint and several liability regime are concerned about the rising costs of litigation, insurance, and damage awards.” Provision of Services: “The Association of Municipalities of Ontario identifies another negative externality of joint and several liability: municipalities are having to delay or otherwise cut back services to limit exposure to liability.” The Law Commission found that the principle of joint and several liability should remain in place although it did not explicitly review the municipal situation.

2014 Resolution by the Ontario Legislature and Review by the Attorney General Over 200 municipalities supported a motion introduced by Randy Pettapiece, MPP for PerthWellington which called for the implementation a comprehensive, long-term solution in 2014. That year, MPPs from all parties supported the Pettapiece motion calling for a reform joint and several liability. Later that year the Ministry of the Attorney General consulted on three options of possible reform:

The Saskatchewan Model of Modified Proportionate Liability Saskatchewan has adopted a modified version of proportionate liability that applies in cases where a plaintiff is contributorily negligent. Under the Saskatchewan rule, where a plaintiff is contributorily negligent and there is an unfunded liability, the cost of the unfunded liability is split among the remaining defendants and the plaintiff in proportion to their fault.

1 Law Commission of Ontario. “Joint and Several Liability Under the Ontario Business Corporations Act.” Final Report, February 2011 Pages 22-25.

150 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Peripheral Wrongdoer Rule for Road Authorities Under this rule, a municipality would never be liable for more than two times its proportion of damages, even if it results in the plaintiff being unable to recover full damages.
A combination of both of the above Ultimately, the government decided not to pursue any of the incremental policy options ostensibly because of uncertainty that insurance cost reductions would result. This was a disappointing result for municipalities. While these reviews did not produce results in Ontario, many other common law jurisdictions have enacted protections for municipalities. What follows are some of the options for a different legal framework.

Options for Reform – The Legal Framework To gain a full appreciation of the various liability frameworks that could be considered, for comparison, below is a description of the current joint and several liability framework here in Ontario. This description will help to reader to understand the further options which follow. This description and the alternatives that follow are taken from the Law Commission of Ontario’s February 2011 Report entitled, “Joint and Several Liability Under the Ontario Business Corporations Act” as referenced above. 2 Understanding the Status Quo and Comparing it to the Alternatives Where three different defendants are found to have caused a plaintiff’s loss, the plaintiff is entitled to seek full payment (100%) from any one of the defendants. The defendant who fully satisfies the judgment has a right of contribution from the other liable parties based on the extent of their responsibility for the plaintiff’s loss. For example, a court may find defendants 1 (D1), 2 (D2) and 3 (D3) responsible for 70%, 20%, and 10% of the plaintiff’s $100,000 loss, respectively. The plaintiff may seek to recover 100% of the loss from D2, who may then seek contribution from D1 and D3 for their 70% and 10% shares of the loss. If D1 and/or D3 is unable to compensate D2 for the amount each owes for whatever reason, such as insolvency or unavailability, D2 will bear the full $100,000 loss. The plaintiff will be fully compensated for $100,000, and it is the responsibility of the defendants to apportion the loss fairly between them. The descriptions that follow are abridged from pages 9-11 of the Law Commission of Ontario’s report. These are some of the key alternatives to the status quo.

2 Ibid. Page 7.

151 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Proportionate Liability a) Full Proportionate Liability A system of full proportionate liability limits the liability of each co-defendant to the proportion of the loss for which he or she was found to be responsible. Per the above example, (in which Defendant 1 (D1) is responsible for 70% of loss, Defendant 2 (D2) for 20% and Defendant 3 (D3) for 10%), under this system, D2 will only be responsible for $20,000 of the $100,000 total judgement: equal to 20% of their share of the liability. Likewise, D1 and D3 will be responsible for $70,000 and $10,000. If D1 and D3 are unable to pay, the plaintiff will only recover $20,000 from D2. b) Proportionate Liability where Plaintiff is Contributorily Negligent This option retains joint and several liability when a blameless plaintiff is involved. This option would cancel or adjust the rule where the plaintiff contributed to their loss. As in the first example, suppose the plaintiff (P) contributed to 20% of their $100,000 loss. D1, D2 and D3 were responsible for 50%, 20% and 10% of the $100,000. If D1 and D3 are unavailable, P and D2 will each be responsible for their $20,000 shares. The plaintiff will remain responsible for the $60,000 shortfall as a result of the absent co-defendants’ non-payment (D1 and D3). c) Proportionate Liability where Plaintiff is Contributorily Negligent with a Proportionate Reallocation of an Insolvent, Financially Limited or Unavailable Defendant’s Share In this option of proportionate liability, the plaintiff and remaining co-defendants share the risk of a defendant’s non-payment. The plaintiff (P) and co-defendants are responsible for any shortfall in proportion to their respective degrees of fault. Using the above example of the $100,000 total judgement, with a shortfall payment of $50,000 from D1 and a shortfall payment $10,000 from D3, P and D2 must pay for the missing $60,000. P and D2 have equally-apportioned liability, which causes them to be responsible for half of each shortfall $25,000 and $5,000 from each non-paying defendant. The burden is shared between the plaintiff (if determined to be responsible) and the remaining defendants. d) Proportionate Liability with a Peripheral Wrongdoer Under this option, a defendant will be proportionately liable only if their share of the liability falls below a specified percentage, meaning that liability would be joint and several. Using the above example, if the threshold amount of liability is set at 25%, D2 and D3 would only be responsible for 20% and 10%, regardless of whether they are the only available or named defendants. However, D1 may be liable for 100% if it is the only available or named defendant. This system tends to favour defendants responsible for a small portion of the loss, but the determination of the threshold amount between joint and several liability and proportionate liability is arbitrary. e) Proportionate Liability with a Reallocation of Some or All of an Insolvent or Unavailable Defendant’s Share This option reallocates the liability of a non-paying defendant among the remaining defendants in proportion to their respective degrees of fault. The plaintiff’s contributory negligence does not

152 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

impact the application of this reallocation. Joint and several liability would continue to apply in cases of fraud or where laws were knowingly violated. f) Court Discretion Similar to the fraud exception in the option above, this option includes giving the courts discretion to apply different forms of liability depending on the case. For example, if a particular co-defendant’s share of the fault was relatively minor the court would have discretion to limit that defendant’s liability to an appropriate portion. 2. Legislative Cap on Liability Liability concerns could be addressed by introducing a cap on the amount of damages available for claims for economic loss. 3. Hybrid A number of jurisdictions provide a hybrid system of proportionate liability and caps on damages. Co-defendants are liable for their portion of the damages, but the maximum total amount payable by each co-defendant is capped to a certain limit.

The Saskatchewan Experience As referenced earlier in this paper, the Province of Saskatchewan responded with a variety of legislative actions to assist municipalities in the early 2000s. Some of those key developments are listed below which are abridged from “A Question of Balance: Legislative Responses to Judicial Expansion of Municipal Liability – the Saskatchewan Experience.” The paper was written by Neil Robertson, QC and was presented to the annual conference of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario in 2013. Two key reforms are noted below.

Reforming joint and several liability by introducing modified proportionate liability: “The Contributory Negligence Act” amendments The Contributory Negligence Act retained joint and several liability, but made adjustments in cases where one or more of the defendants is unable to pay its share of the total amount (judgement). Each of the parties at fault, including the plaintiff if contributorily negligent, will still have to pay a share of the judgement based on their degree of fault. However, if one of the defendants is unable to pay, the other defendants who are able to pay are required to pay only their original share and an additional equivalent share of the defaulting party’s share. The change in law allows municipalities to reach out-of-court settlements, based on an estimate of their degree of fault. This allows municipalities to avoid the cost of protracted litigation. Neil Robertson provided the following example to illustrate how this works in practise: “…If the owner of a house sues the builder for negligent construction and the municipality, as building authority, for negligent inspection, and all three are found equally at fault, they would each be apportioned 1/3 or 33.3%. Assume the damages are $100,000. If the builder has no funds, then the municipality would pay only its share ($33,333) and a 1/3 share of the builder’s defaulting share

153 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

(1/3 of $33,333 or $11,111) for a total of $44,444 ($33,333 + $11,111), instead of the $66,666 ($33,333 + $33,333) it would pay under pure joint and several liability.” This model will be familiar to municipal leaders in Ontario. In 2014, Ontario’s Attorney General presented this option (called the Saskatchewan Model of Modified Proportionate Liability) for consideration. At the time, over 200 municipal councils supported the adoption of this option along with the “Peripheral Wrongdoer Rule for Road Authorities” which would have seen a municipality never be liable for more than two times its proportion of damages, even if it results in the plaintiff being unable to recover full damages. These two measures, if enacted, would have represented a significant incremental step to address the impact of joint and several to Ontario municipalities. 2. Providing for uniform limitation periods while maintaining a separate limitation period for municipalities: “The Limitations Act” This act established uniform limitation periods replacing many of the pre-existing limitation periods that had different time periods. The Municipal Acts in Saskatchewan provide a uniform one-year limitation period “from time when the damages were sustained” in absolute terms without a discovery principle which can prolong this period. This helps municipalities to resist “legacy” claims from many years beforehand. This act exempts municipalities from the uniform two-year discoverability limitation period. Limitation periods set deadlines after which claims cannot be brought as lawsuits in the courts. The legislation intends to balance the opportunity for potential claimants to identify their claims and, if possible, negotiate a settlement out of court before starting legal action with the need for potential defendants to “close the books” on claims from the past. The reasoning behind these limitations is that public authorities, including municipalities, should not to be punished by the passage of time. Timely notice will promote the timely investigation and disposition of claims in the public interest. After the expiry of a limitation period, municipalities can consider themselves free of the threat of legal action, and continue with financial planning without hurting “the public taxpayer purse”. Municipalities are mandated to balance their budgets and must be able to plan accordingly. Thus, legacy claims can have a very adverse affect on municipal operations. Here in Ontario, there is a uniform limitations period of two years. Municipalities also benefit from a 10-day notice period which is required for slip and fall cases. More recently, the applicability of this limitation deadline has become variable and subject to judicial discretion. Robertson’s paper notes that in Saskatchewan, courts have accepted the one-year limitations period. A further examination of limitations in Ontario may yield additional benefits and could include the one-year example in Saskatchewan and/or the applicability of the 10-day notice period for slip and fall cases. Other Saskatchewan reforms Saskatchewan has also implemented other reforms which include greater protections for building inspections, good faith immunity, duty of repair, no fault insurance, permitting class actions, and limiting nuisance actions. Some of these reforms are specific to Saskatchewan and some of these currently apply in Ontario.

154 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Insurance Related Reforms Government Regulated Insurance Limits The April 2019 provincial budget included a commitment to increase the catastrophic impairment default benefit limit to $2 million. Public consultations were led by the Ministry of Finance in September 2019. AMO wrote to the Ministry in support of increasing the limit to $2 million to ensure more adequate support those who suffer catastrophic impairment. In 2016, the government lowered this limit as well as third-party liability coverage to $200,000 from $1 million. This minimum should also be also be increased to $2 million to reflect current actual costs. This significant deficiency needs to be addressed. Insurance Industry Changes In 1989 the Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange (OMEX) was established as a non-profit reciprocal insurance provider for Ontario’s municipalities. It ceased operations in 2016 citing, “[a] low pricing environment, combined with the impact of joint & several liability on municipal claim settlements has made it difficult to offer sustainable pricing while still addressing the municipalities’ concern about retro assessments.”3 (Retro assessments meant paying additional premiums for retroactive coverage for “long-tail claims” which made municipal budgeting more challenging.) The demise of OMEX has changed the municipal insurance landscape in Ontario. That joint and several liability is one of the key reasons listed for the collapse of a key municipal insurer should be a cause for significant concern. Fewer choices fuels cost. While there are other successful municipal insurance pools in Ontario, the bulk of the insurance market is dominated by for-profit insurance companies. Reciprocal non-profit insurers are well represented in other areas across Canada. Municipalities in Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia are all insured by non-profit reciprocals. The questions for policy makers in Ontario: Are there any provincial requirements or regulations which could better support the non-profit reciprocal municipal insurance market? What actions could be taken to better protect municipalities in Ontario in sourcing their insurance needs? How can we drive down insurance costs to better serve the needs of municipal property taxpayers?

3 Canadian Underwriter, August 11, 2016 https://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/insurance/ontario-municipal-insurance-

exchange-suspends-underwriting-operations-1004098148/

155 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Conclusion This AMO paper has endeavoured to refresh municipal arguments on the need to find a balance to the issues and challenges presented by joint and several liability. It has endeavoured to illustrate that options exist and offer the reassurance that they can be successfully implemented as other jurisdictions have done. Finding solutions that work will require provincial and municipal commitment. Working together, we can find a better way that is fair, reasonable, and responsible. It is time to find a reasonable balance.

156 of 575 2019-119 Corporate Page Services Support of the Association of Municipalities…

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Report 2019-120 Recommend Report to Council To:

Warden and Members of County Council

From:

Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Corporate Services – Authorization of the Use of Reserves for the Eastern Ontario Regional Network (EORN) improvements of cellular coverage in Eastern Ontario

Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Corporate Services – Authorization of the Use of Reserves for the Eastern Ontario Regional Network improvements of cellular coverage in Eastern Ontario report; And Further That County Council authorize staff to expense the County of Frontenac’s remaining share amount of $139,750 for the EORN improvements of cellular coverage project from reserves (with $250,000 already authorized from the use of the Municipal Modernization Fund); Background At its regular meeting held May 16, 2018, Council, through consideration of Report 2018-076, passed the following resolution, being Recommend Reports from the Chief Administrative Officer, clause k) k)

2018-076 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer EORN Cell Gap Capacity Expansion Project - Request for Funding

Motion #: 94-18

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Dewey Councillor Vandewal

Whereas at the April 19-20, 2018 meeting of the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus (EOWC) a motion was passed recommending a funding for the distribution of costs related to the Eastern Ontario Regional Network’s cell gap project;

157 of 575 of the Use of Reserves for the… 2019-120 Corporate Page Services Authorization

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac accept the Eastern Ontario Regional Network (EORN) Cell Gap Capacity Expansion Project report; and, Further That Council support the funding request in the 2019 County budget in the amount of $400,000, with final funding to be determined as part of the 2019 budget process; and, Further That Council express their sincere appreciation to EORN and the EOWC for their efforts to improve cellular coverage and capacity in Frontenac County and Eastern Ontario. Carried In terms of the commitment by the County of $400,000, as noted in the resolution, final funding was to be determined as part of the 2019 budget process. Comment During the 2019 Budget deliberations in February, staff had not yet been advised by EORN of the County’s final contribution amount and as a result, no recommendations on the use of reserves to cover this amount was made by staff. EORN received the formal Letter of Approval for Provincial and Federal funding of the EORN Cell Project from Minister Laurie Scott on September 9, 2019 and are now working with the Ministry of Infrastructure (MOI) to formalize a Contribution Agreement (CA) so that the project can move forward with implementation in 2020. EORN has advised that all thirteen members of the EOWC, and nine members of the Eastern Ontario Mayors’ Caucus (EOMC) have agreed to financially support the Cell Gap project. The Municipal contribution calculations have now been finalized with the County of Frontenac’s total contribution being $389,750. EORN has provided members with two options for making their contribution, those being: 

Prepayment Option: To assist EORN with the cash flow for the project, Municipalities have the option of prepaying to EORN the Member Contribution and receiving an interest payment on the declining balance for a period of three years (3). The investment portion not yet due shall earn interest at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of the investment to the date that the payment would otherwise be due. Interest earned on the investment shall be paid by EORN to the Municipality on an annual basis. For example, if the entire payment is made in advance, three quarters of the payment shall be considered to be an investment, and that amount shall earn interest on the anniversary of the initial payment. However, after the first year when the first installment payment is due to be made in the second year, only two thirds of the amount will earn interest, and then after the second year, one third will earn interest until the final payment is due.

Recommend Report to Council Corporate Services – Authorization of the Use of Reserves for the Eastern Ontario Regional Network improvements of cellular coverage in Eastern Ontario October 16, 2019 Page 2 of 4

158 of 575 of the Use of Reserves for the… 2019-120 Corporate Page Services Authorization

AGENDA ITEM #c)



Annual Payment Option over Four Years: The Municipality shall make a payment on an annual basis of a one quarter share of its contribution, with the first payment due and payable upon execution of this Municipal Agreement and the balance of payments due in equal installments on the anniversary date of the date of this Agreement, in three equal annual installments. No interest is earned in this Option.

Pending a response from members on their preferred option, EORN will then invoice accordingly and send a draft Municipal Contribution Agreement outlining the terms and conditions of the payment: Staff are recommending that the County proceed with the Prepayment Option, providing EORN with the full $389,750 upfront. The 5% return offered by EORN exceeds the return available to the County through the LAS High Interest Savings Account (2.415% as of August 31, 2019) or a comparable 4-year bank bond issue (2.6% as of September 19, 2019). At its regular meeting held July 17, 2019, Council, through the consideration of Report 2019089, passed resolution 131-19 which, among other things, approved $250,000 in 2019 to the EORN Cell Gap Project from the Municipal Modernization Fund. Staff are recommending that the additional one-time cost of $139,750 be funded from the Stabilization reserve. Council approval is required before staff are able to take the remaining $139,750 from the Stabilization reserve. Staff are bringing this report to Council prior to the October budget deliberations as resolution 94-18 noted above directs the EORN Cell Gap Capacity Expansion Project to be funded as part of the 2019 budget. In addition, in order to take advantage of the 5% interest rate being offered by EORN, payment must be received by the end of 2019. Strategic Priority Implications 1.1 1.2

Provide committed leadership and continuing support to the long-term regional plan to enhance broadband and cell service. Refine and invest in efforts to accelerate economic development – to grow businesses, attract more visits and expand the tax base.

Financial Implications By the County going with the prepayment option, the County would earn $29,231 through 2022. Year 2020 2021 2022 Total

Prepayment Amount $292,312.50 $194,875.00 $97,437.50

Interest Rate 5% 5% 5% 5%

Interest Earned $14,615.63 $9,743.75 $4,871.88 $29,231.25

159 of 575 of the Use of Reserves for the… 2019-120 Corporate Page Services Authorization

AGENDA ITEM #c)

The next best option available, which would be to invest in a 2.6% bank bond while foregoing bank interest on the annual payments (2.2% as of August 31, 2019) as they become due to EORN, would be estimated to return $17,460. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected David Fell, CEO, Eastern Ontario Regional Network (EORN) Alex Lemieux, Deputy Treasurer

160 of 575 of the Use of Reserves for the… 2019-120 Corporate Page Services Authorization

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Report 2019-122 Council Recommend Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Gale Chevalier, Chief/Director Emergency and Transportation Services

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2020

Re:

Frontenac Paramedic Services – 2020 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan

Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive the Emergency and Transportation Services – 2020 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan report for information; And Further That Council direct the Clerk to introduce a by-law later in the meeting adopting the response time standards as outlined in this report. Background At its meeting on September 19, 2018, County Council passed the following resolution: Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac accept this Emergency and Transportation Services – 2019 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan report; And Further That Council direct the Clerk to introduce a by-law later in the meeting adopting the response time standards as outlined in this report. Carried The County of Frontenac set the following criteria under Regulation 257/00, as amended, for its response time targets for 2019: For the calendar year of 2019, from January 1 to December 31,

161 Services of 575 2020 Legislated Response Time Perf… 2019-122 FrontenacPage Paramedic

AGENDA ITEM #d)

i. Designated Delivery Agent (DDA) - Sudden Cardiac Arrest 48% percent of the time, within 6 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a person equipped and ready to use an AED at the location of a patient determined to be in sudden cardiac arrest. ii. EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 1 70% percent of the time, within 8 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a PARAMEDIC as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 1. iii. EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 The County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a Paramedic as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 within a period of time determined appropriate by the DDA and noted below in Table 1, or as resources permit (level of effort): Table 1, CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 EMS Delivery Agent Commitment CTAS Target Time from Paramedic Received Until on Scene 2 10 minutes 3 10 minutes 4 10 minutes 5 10 minutes

% Target 75% 75% 75% 75%

Comment Since the inception of RTS in 2013, the County of Frontenac has met and/or exceeded its stated RTS as illustrated in the graph below.

Recommendation Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services – 2019 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan October 16, 2019

162 Services of 575 2020 Legislated Response Time Perf… 2019-122 FrontenacPage Paramedic

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #d)

It is recommended that the County of Frontenac maintain the same criteria under Regulation 257/100, as amended, for its response time targets for 2020. For the calendar year of 2020, from January 1 to December 31, i. Designated Delivery Agent (DDA) - Sudden Cardiac Arrest 48% percent of the time, within 6 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a person equipped and ready to use an AED at the location of a patient determined to be in sudden cardiac arrest. ii. EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 1 70% percent of the time, within 8 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a PARAMEDIC as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 1. iii. EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 The County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a Paramedic as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 within a period of time determined appropriate by the DDA and noted below in Table 1, or as resources permit (level of effort): Table 1, CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 EMS Delivery Agent Commitment CTAS Target Time from Paramedic Received Until on Scene 2 10 minutes 3 10 minutes 4 10 minutes 5 10 minutes

% Target 75% 75% 75% 75%

Strategic Priorities Implications Other Important and Continuing County Priorities:  Implement strategic plans for Fairmount Home and Frontenac Paramedics. Financial Implications None at this time. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected

Recommendation Report to Council Emergency and Transportation Services – 2019 Legislated Response Time Performance Plan October 16, 2019

163 Services of 575 2020 Legislated Response Time Perf… 2019-122 FrontenacPage Paramedic

Page 3 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #e)

Report 2019-123 Council Recommend Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Lisa Hirvi, Fairmount Home Administrator

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Fairmount Home – Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home

Recommendation Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac (“County Council”) received the Fairmount Home – Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home report for approval; And Further That County Council, as the licensee for Fairmount Home for the Aged (“Fairmount”), shall ensure compliance with the Long-Term Care Homes Act, 2007 (“LTCHA”) that requires homes meet the staffing and care standards provided for in Ontario Regulation 79/10 (“Regulations”); And Further That County Council shall ensure compliance with the Regulations that includes the requirement for a nursing and personal support services staffing plan that provides for a staffing mix that is consistent with the residents’ assessed care and safety needs; And Further That County Council, as the licensee for Fairmount, support Fairmount’s five-year business plan that includes the plan for service level changes towards a minimum four hours of care per resident per day to ensure that residents’ assessed care and safety needs are met. Background The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) released the public report amended on July 24, 2019 regarding the Corporation of the County of Bruce (“Bruce County”) as the licensee for the municipally operated long-term care home, Brucelea Haven Long Term Care Home (“Brucelea Haven”). The Orders of the Director (Amendment) is attached and includes compliance orders (“CO”) under section 153(1)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 164 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

of the LTCHA after follow-up inspections concluding in May 2019. The inspectors determined that Bruce County, as the licensee, failed to comply with the requirements under the LTCHA including Regulation 31(3), as it failed to have a staffing plan that provided for a staffing mix that was consistent with residents’ assessed care and safety needs and failed to promote continuity of care. Also, Bruce County was non-compliant with subsection 18(1) of the LTCHA, as it failed to ensure that the programs required under sections 8 to 16 (includes nursing and personal care, restorative care, recreational and social activities, dietary services and hydration, medical services, information and referral assistance, religious and spiritual practices, accommodation services, volunteer program), the services provided under those programs complied with any standards or requirements, were provided for in the Regulations. As such, Bruce County’s non-compliance with these sections of the LTCHA and Regulations resulted in their residents being at risk for receiving insufficient nursing and personal care to ensure that their residents’ assessed needs and safety were being met. Staffing shortages impacted resident care not being completed based on assessed needs and/or plans of care in the following areas: transfers, bathing, toileting/continence care, repositioning and monitoring, oral care, assistance at all meals, timely medication administration, completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, assessments for altered skin integrity and authorization for admission. The home’s staffing mix and staffing shortages did not promote continuity of care and did not ensure that there were enough direct care staff/hours to meet the residents’ assessed care and safety needs. In addition to staffing shortages, Brucelea Haven experienced management issues including vacant key positions, staff who lacked support, experience and training in their roles and staff being reassigned to the floor to address staffing shortages. In addition to compromised resident care and safety, there were other impacts noted in the ministry report, for example, staff safety was compromised, staff resignations including turnover of newly hired staff, frustration due to lack of support, exhaustion due to workload, overtime, double shifts, part-time staff working full-time hours (no staff available for call-ins) and Registered Nurse (RN) coverage 24/7 not fulfilled. Comment Fairmount’s Recommend Report (2019-110) regarding the Public Inquiry into the Safety and Security of Residents in the Long-Term Care Homes System (the “Inquiry”) was shared with County Council on September 18, 2019. Although the Inquiry was not tasked with conducting a general review of the long-term care (LTC) system nor to make recommendations on how LTC homes or the LTC system might be improved more generally, the Inquiry’s report highlighted three principal findings, two of which are as follows: the offences were the result of systemic vulnerabilities…and the LTC system is strained but not broken. Furthermore, the Inquiry’s report stated that systemic issues require a systemic response of which there are four: 1) prevention, 2) awareness, 3) deterrence, and 4) detection. LTC homes are called to take a leadership role in deterrence, with appropriate funding from the ministry. The state of Bruce County’s LTC home along with the Inquiry’s recommendations highlight the importance of strategic planning and action to minimize the risks to resident Recommend Report to Council Fairmount Home – Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home October 16, 2019

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 165 BruceofCounty’s

Page 2 of 4

AGENDA ITEM #e)

care, safety and security. Fairmount’s strategic plan and key action items are the basis for the 5-year business plan, which includes service level changes, identifying risks and mitigation strategies. Service level changes in the business plan are based on the industry standard of a minimum four (4) hours of direct care per resident per day, which will be achieved over a seven (7) year period ending in 2023. County Council’s commitment to Fairmount’s strategic plan supports staff in addressing the systemic issues and responding accordingly with prevention, awareness, deterrence and detection. The service level changes approved since 2017 have helped to address the increasing care and service needs of Fairmount’s resident population. However, additional staff are required to respond to increasing and changing resident care and service needs, as well as, maintaining a strong organization and positive work culture for staff and volunteers. Staff will continue to actively plan in order to maintain staffing levels to provide resident care and services and to minimize the impact of the health human resource (HHR) crisis affecting health care organizations across Ontario and Canada. In 2020, Fairmount will undergo an operational review, which will provide County Council and staff with further direction in meeting the legislative requirements, as well as, fulfilling Fairmount’s vision to be the home of choice for our residents, staff and volunteers. Strategic Priority Implications Council’s Continuing Priorities relevant to this recommend report are as follows: 

Implement strategic plan for Fairmount



Continually improve customer and financial services



Maintain a strong organization and positive work culture through leadership, human resources, training and development, physical and IT infrastructure and partnerships

Financial Implications Fairmount’s business plan details the seven (7) year plan for the service level changes. The budget provides the financial costs for the upcoming year with projections for future years. Annual project proposals provide the details of and rationale for service level changes. Municipal contributions are used to supplement shortfalls in ministry funding, which allows Fairmount to provide the assessed care and services to residents. With recent ministry funding announcements, Fairmount’s funding is less than budgeted. However, the municipal contributions for Fairmount are reasonable when compared to other LTC homes in eastern Ontario and the province. The details will be presented in the upcoming budget presentations, so County Council can make informed decisions about

Recommend Report to Council Fairmount Home – Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home October 16, 2019

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 166 BruceofCounty’s

Page 3 of 4

AGENDA ITEM #e)

meeting its obligations as licensee under the LTCHA and in implementing Fairmount’s strategic plan. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Organizations – Bruce County, Ministry of Long-Term Care Departments – Fairmount Home, Corporate Services

Recommend Report to Council Fairmount Home – Bruce County’s Long-Term Care Home October 16, 2019

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 167 BruceofCounty’s

Page 4 of 4

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 168 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 169 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 170 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 171 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 172 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 173 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 174 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 175 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 176 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 177 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 178 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 179 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 180 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 181 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 182 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 183 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 184 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 185 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 186 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 187 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 188 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #e)

575 Long-Term Care Home 2019-123 FairmountPage Home 189 BruceofCounty’s

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Report 2019-121 Council Information Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Transportation Services – Reporting Document

Recommendation Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac receive for information the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Transportation Services – Reporting Document report; And Further That County Council approve the Transportation Reporting Document, to be used by Southern Frontenac Community Services and Rural Frontenac Community Services when submitting quarterly reports on the use of the County grant funding in support of their respective Transportation Services. Background In 2019, the County of Frontenac provided a grant of $96,000 to support senior transportation services in the County. The grant was in support of the prior Council’s strategic priority namely: “Addressing the existing gap in Seniors Affordable Housing stock by leveraging and/or funding the construction of a project in each of the four Frontenac townships – to be accomplished by the end of the 2015-18 term of Council.” The funding was split equally between Rural Frontenac Community Services (RFCS) and Southern Frontenac Community Services (SFCS). In late 2016 and early 2017, the County supported both agencies in an effort to improve access to transportation services through the Big Data for Small Places program.

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief190 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Prior to the approval of the 2015 County Strategic Plan direction noted above, the transportation imperative of the County and the Frontenac Transportation Service (FTS) was broad in scope and did not specify a priority for the delivery of services to seniors. As part of the 2007 budget, Council approved $10,000 for the development of a business plan which would review transportation service options within the County. On August 1, 2007 Council authorized the Request for Proposals for a consultant to complete the business plan. In September 2007, the RFP was released and Cynthia Johnston & Associates was the successful consultant. The RFP was divided into 2 phases – Phase I – Needs & Resources Analysis and Phase II – recommended courses of action if need was identified as a result of Phase I. In 2011 a presentation was made to Council on the history of Norther and Southern FCS and their collaborative for the Transportation Service. Within the presentation it noted that the following outcomes and goals for FTS, namely:

Support of both Boards and the South East LHIN
Maintain over 90% of current volunteers
Recruit a minimum of 5% new volunteers
Operate at a break even basis
Meet at least 80% of rider requests
Purchase 5,000 fridge magnets with the FTS 1-800 phone number
Return to the County in 2012 with the success stories In 2010, the County of Frontenac provided $80,000 to FTS to support drives totaling over 500,000 kms. In 2011, FTS sought County of Frontenac support in the amount of $86,000. In 2014, this was increased by $10,000 to $96,000 Comment This year is the first year that the grant was split between the two organizations. In prior years, the entire grant was provided to Frontenac Transportation Services (FTS) who in turn supported transportation services provided by SFCS. With both services now reporting to Council and annually requesting a supporting grant, there is a need to standardize reporting in order for Council to be able to evaluate performance against stated objectives. Attached, Schedule A is a proposed reporting form that staff recommend be compiled quarterly by each agency and submitted within 15 days of the end of each quarter. At the first Council meeting after submission, Council will receive three reports, a completed report from each agency (2), plus a covering page roll up (1). Staff recognize that the service delivery of both agencies is different, with RFSC providing services beyond Council’s mandate with respect to senior’s transportation and SFSC employing a means test for subsidy. Neither group provides dedicated services to Frontenac Islands residents, but will assist where requested and feasible. Recommend Report to Council Office of the CAO – Transportation Services – Reporting Document October 16, 2019

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief191 Administrative

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Strategic Priorities 3.2 Play a leadership role on communications to promote shared messaging for all regional initiatives such as economic development, tourism and lifestyle opportunities, and broadband and cell services. 4.1 Respect the taxpayer and keep tax increases close to the rate of inflation.

Financial Implications There are no financial considerations associated with this report; however the information provided will improve transparency and future decision making by Council. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk Treasurers, RFSC and SFSC

Recommend Report to Council Office of the CAO – Transportation Services – Reporting Document October 16, 2019

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief192 Administrative

Page 3 of 3

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief193 Administrative

AGENCY LOGO

XXXX Frontenac Community Services Transportation Reporting - 2019

8-Oct-19

DATA Reporting CFCS Funding County Funding (Annual)

48,000 Q1

Indicates -> Q2

Input Cells Q4

Total 0 0 0

0.0% 0

0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0

Comment All Drives Provided by the Agency All Drives Provided by the Agency Cumulative Total Row 3 x Row 4 Row 3/Row 6 Row 2/Row 3

0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Check

Good

Good if Row 1 - Row 23 = 0, Otherwise ERR

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Row

Base Informtation

of Drives

of KMs Driven

of Unique Clients

4 % of Seniors 5

of Unique Seniors

6 Total # Subsidized 7 % Subsidized 8

of KMs Driven/Client

9 $’s/KM Charged to Client 10 $’s/KM Paid to Drivers 11

of Drivers

12 13 Destination Information 14 Hospital 15 GSAC Programs 16 Adult Day Programs 17 Medical 18 Shopping 19 Miscellaneous 20 21 22 23 24

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief194 Administrative

AGENCY LOGO

XXXX Frontenac Community Services Transportation Reporting - 2019

8-Oct-19

Row

Revenue Summary

25 County of Frontenac Grant 26 Total Fees Collected 27 Subsidy from LHIN 28 Subsidy from 3rd Party 29 30 31 Revenue Total

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

Total

12,000

48,000 0 0 0 0 0 48,000 0

Expense Summary Salaries, Wages & Benefits (SWB) Paid to Volunteers Allocation of Overhead Advertising

Expenditure Total

Net ( Cost ) or Profit

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$12,000

$48,000

Comment County Grant/4

Insert Salary Allocated to the Program All Expenses Paid to Volunteers In Accordance with Your Budget Policy

Row 31 - Row 38

Date

Signature

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Attestation: I, _______________________________________, representing Southern Frontenac Community Services (SFCS), hereby attest the above submission is a true representation of the transportation services provided by SFCS during the reporting period. I understand the information is subject to audit by the County of Frontenac.

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief195 Administrative

XXXX Frontenac Community Services

8-Oct-19 Transportation Reporting - 2019

AGENCY LOGO

AGENDA ITEM #f)

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief196 Administrative

AGENCY LOGO

XXXX Frontenac Community Services Transportation Reporting - 2019

8-Oct-19

GRAPHS (To Date)

of Drives

of Unique Clients

of KMs Driven

0 Q1

Destination

of KMs Driven/Client

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miscellaneous Shopping Medical Adult Day Programs GSAC Programs Hospital 0

AGENDA ITEM #f)

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Page of 575 Officer Transportation Servi… 2019-121 Office of the Chief197 Administrative

XXXX Frontenac Community Services

8-Oct-19 Transportation Reporting - 2019

AGENCY LOGO

AGENDA ITEM #f)

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Report 2019-117 Council Information Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Kathie Shaw, Senior Financial Analyst

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Corporate Services – Asset Condition Assessment

Recommendation This report is for information purposes only. Background During the 2015 budget deliberations, Council approved an annual allocation of $5,000 to the County Operations Reserve to fund asset condition assessments every 5 years for the County of Frontenac. In 2018, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) offered funding through the Municipal Asset Management Program (MAMP) to assist with the development of asset management plans and infrastructure investment decisions. In Report 2018-086, Corporate Services – Federation of Canadian Municipalities Municipal Asset Management Program Funding, Council approved the application to the FCM MAMP for the maximum funding of $50,000. FCM provides funding for up to 80% of eligible costs with remaining funds to come from the County Operations Reserve. The County was successful in this application for the full amount of $50,000 as notified in late 2018. The funds have been used to assess the condition of the following facilities:      

Fairmount Home building Old House building Ambulance stations in Sydenham, Robertsville, Parham, Palace Road, and Wolfe Island Howe Island Ferry building Parking lots and laneways for all sites The bridges on the K&P Trail

198 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Request for Proposal 2019-010 for Asset Condition Assessment was issued in April 2019. Candidates were evaluated on their written proposal and in-person interviews with the successful candidate being J. L. Richards & Associates Limited (JLR). In addition to their expertise, JLR used on-site inspections and discussions with relevant staff to document the present condition, recommend corrective actions for observed deficiencies in the next ten years, and provided high level cost estimates for corrective actions. The JLR assessment, presented in Appendix A, B, and C to this Council report, include a written report, detailed inventory tables, and photographs to evaluate the components of the County facilities in regards to condition, life expectancy, life remaining, and estimated repair and replacement costs. The categories reviewed for each facility, as presented in the final table in Appendix B, are as follows. Class      Asset • • • • • Attribute • • • • •

Architectural and Structural HVAC Plumbing Elevators Parking Lots/Lane Ways Building Structure Building Envelope Roof Building Interior Emergency Power System Exterior Walls Roof Assembly Slab on Grade Transformers Generator

Bridge Assessment •

The K&P Bridge assessment is presented in Appendix D as a separate report in a format to meet Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) biennial reporting requirements. The objective of these bridge assessments was to determine the general condition of each structure’s elements, and to make general recommendations for repair, maintenance and/or rehabilitation, for any observed deficiencies and to provide estimated costs for repairs.

Comment The following table summarizes the estimated costs for each facility. Detailed information can be found in the report and tables in the Appendix.

Information Report to Council Corporate Services – Asset Condition Assessment October 16, 2019

199 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Facility Fairmount Home Administration Building (Old House) Palace Road Ambulance Base Sydenham Ambulance Base Robertsville Ambulance Base Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Parham Ambulance Base Fairmount Home - Paramedic Offices Howe Island Ferry K & P Trail Bridges Totals

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe Immediate 0 to 5 Years 5 to 10 Years Total Cost $ 18,950 $ 1,208,075 $ 2,363,100 $ 3,590,125 $ 5,000 $ 110,200 $ 149,750 $ 264,950 $ 2,000 $ 20,000 $ 74,000 $ 96,000 $ 1,648 $ 15,000 $ 16,648 $ 2,200 $ 2,200 $ 2,750 $ 5,600 $ 8,350 $ 3,500 $ 10,000 $ 17,700 $ 31,200 $ 34,307 $ 34,307 $ 3,500 $ 10,300 $ 3,300 $ 17,100 $ 3,300 $ 50,000 $ 15,000 $ 68,300 $ 39,000 $ 1,444,530 $ 2,645,650 $ 4,129,180

Strategic Priorities Implications Priority 2 – Explore new funding and invest in infrastructure. The 2019 Asset Condition Assessment report will be a foundation to “finalize plans and financing to replace/construct/renovate aging County buildings”, including the Administration building (Old House), Fairmount Home and the Paramedics’ facilities. Economic Development strategic priorities include attracting more visits to the County and the evaluation of the K&P Trail bridges will focus repairs/rehabilitation, where they are needed to maintain the Trail as a viable tourist route. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Alex Lemieux, Deputy Treasurer Chris McBain, Superintendent Logistics, Frontenac Paramedics Tom Mercer, Manager of Environmental Services, Fairmount Home

Information Report to Council Corporate Services – Asset Condition Assessment October 16, 2019

200 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

Page 3 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Building Condition Assessment Report

September 2019

Prepared for: THE COUNTY OF FRONTENAC 2069 Battersea Rod Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0

Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 203‐863 Princess Street Kingston, ON K7L 5N4 Tel: 613‐544‐1424 Fax: 613‐544‐5679

JLR No.: 28833‐000.1

201 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

202 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment

Revision History Rev. #

Date

Description

10-03-2019

Corrections to Math and correction of minor typographical errors.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000.1

Distribution Kathie Shaw CPA, CGA Senior Financial Analyst Corporate Services County of Frontenac

September 2019 -i-

203 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

204 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment

Client Review Reviewed by:

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000.1

September 2019 -iii-

205 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment

Table of Contents 1.0 2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY, LIMITATIONS, AND ASSUMPTIONS ………………………… 6 2.1 Report Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 2.2 Review of Background Information ……………………………………………………………… 6 2.3 Preparation of Inspection Materials …………………………………………………………….. 6 2.4 Site Inspection …………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.5 Review of Collected Data ………………………………………………………………………….. 6 2.6 Limitations ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 2.7 Assumptions ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………………………….. 8 3.1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach ……………………………………………….. 8 3.2 Condition Rating System …………………………………………………………………………… 9 3.3 Estimated Remaining Life ………………………………………………………………………….. 9 FAIRMOUNT HOME CONDITION ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………….. 11 4.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 4.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 11 4.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 4.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 4.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 4.6 Elevators ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 4.7 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 18 4.8 Life Safety ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 18 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT ………………………………….. 24 5.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 5.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 24 5.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 5.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 5.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 PALACE ROAD AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT ………………………… 31 6.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 31 6.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 31 6.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33 6.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 6.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 6.6 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 34 SYDENHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT …………………………….. 36 7.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 36 7.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 36 7.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 37 7.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38 7.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38 7.6 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 39 ROBERTSVILLE AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT ………………………. 41 8.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41 8.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 41 8.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 42 8.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 42

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000.1

September 2019 -iv-

206 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment

9.0

10.0

11.0 12.0

13.0 14.0

8.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 43 8.6 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 43 WOLFE ISLAND AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT ……………………….. 45 9.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 9.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 45 9.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 46 9.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46 9.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46 9.6 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 47 PARHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT …………………………………. 49 10.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 10.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 49 10.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 50 10.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 51 10.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 52 10.6 Parking Lots / Lane Ways ………………………………………………………………………… 52 FAIRMOUNT HOME PARAMEDIC OFFICES CONDITION ASSESSMENT …………….. 55 11.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 55 11.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 55 HOWE ISLAND FERRY CONDITION ASSESSMENT …………………………………………… 57 12.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57 12.2 Structural / Architectural ………………………………………………………………………….. 57 12.3 HVAC ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 58 12.4 Plumbing ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 58 12.5 Electrical ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 58 K & P TRAIL BRIDGES CONDITION ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………. 61 13.1 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 61 COST SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL UPGRADES ……………………………. 62

List of Tables Table 1: Example Categories in Hierarchical Structure ………………………………………………………. 8 Table 2: Condition Rating System …………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Table 3: Expected Useful Life Estimations for Each Asset Class ……………………………………….. 10 Table 4: Summary of Historical Fairmount Home Upgrades ……………………………………………… 11 Table 5: Summary of Fairmount Home Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs .. 19 Table 6: Summary of Historical Administration Building Upgrades ……………………………………… 24 Table 7: Summary of Administration Building Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 Table 8: Summary of Historical Palace Road Ambulance Base Upgrades ………………………….. 31 Table 9: Summary of Palace Road Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 35 Table 10: Summary of Historical Sydenham Ambulance Base Upgrades ……………………………. 36 Table 11: Summary of Sydenham Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 39 Table 12: Summary of Historical Robertsville Ambulance Base Upgrades ………………………….. 41 Table 13: Summary of Robertsville Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000.1

September 2019 -v-

207 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment

Table 14: Summary of Historical Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Upgrades …………………………. 45 Table 15: Summary of Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 47 Table 16: Summary of Historical Parham Ambulance Base Upgrades ……………………………….. 49 Table 17: Summary of Parham Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 53 Table 18: Summary of Historical Fairmount Home Paramedic Offices Building Upgrades …….. 55 Table 19: Summary of Fairmount Home Paramedic Offices Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 56 Table 20: Summary of Historical Howe Island Ferry Building Upgrades ……………………………… 57 Table 21: Summary of Howe Island Ferry Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 59 Table 22: Summary of K&P Trail Bridges Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 61 Table 23: Summary of Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs ………………………. 62

List of Figures Figure 1: Location Plan – Location of Fairmount Home and County of Frontenac Administrative Office Building (Old House) ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Figure 2: Location Plan – General Locations of Listed Paramedic Bases ……………………………… 4 Figure 3: Location Plan - General Location of Howe Island Ferry Building…………………………….. 5

List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B

Asset Inventory Tables Reference Photographs

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000.1

September 2019 -vi-

208 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

209 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report

1.0

INTRODUCTION

The County of Frontenac (The County) initiated an RFP in May 2019 to procure consultant services to carry out a Building Condition Assessment (BCA) of various county owned buildings and foot bridges with the intent to refine their long term asset management plan that manages the life cycle and performance of the County’s assets. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited (JLR) was retained by The County in June, 2019 to provide professional architectural and engineering services to complete a BCA of buildings and bridges identified in their RFP. The County is a rural upper tier municipality located in Eastern Ontario extending from the islands south of the City of Kingston to north of Highway 7. The total population of the County is approximately 26,677 with an area of approximately 4,000 square kilometres, including the Townships of North Frontenac, Central Frontenac, South Frontenac, and Frontenac Islands. The County manages the operations of the Fairmount Home (long term care facility), Frontenac Paramedic Services, the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry and is involved in recreational trail development. The following is a list of the County facilities related to these operations that were assessed:   

 

Fairmount Home (Long term care facility) County of Frontenac Administrative Office Building (Old House) Paramedic Bases – 5 Bases o Palace Rd Ambulance Base o Sydenham Ambulance Base o Wolfe Island Ambulance Base o Robertsville Ambulance Base o Parham Ambulance Base Howe Island Ferry Building K&P Trail – 5 Bridges o Millhaven Creek Bridge o Hardwood Creek Bridge o White Creek Bridge o Elbow Creek Bridge o Fish Creek Bridge

Refer to Figure 1, 2 and 3 for general location plans of assessed buildings. As part of the BCA process, key members of the JLR project team undertook a condition assessment of the listed buildings and bridges over the months of July and August 2019 in order to establish the bridges’ and facilities’ existing conditions and identify replacement and/or repair needs. The purpose of this Report is to summarize key findings from the condition assessment, which will be used to inform The County’s long term asset management plan.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -2-

210 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report

Figure 1: Location Plan – Location of Fairmount Home and County of Frontenac Administrative Office Building (Old House)

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -3-

211 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report

Figure 2: Location Plan – General Locations of Listed Paramedic Bases

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -4-

212 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report

Figure 3: Location Plan - General Location of Howe Island Ferry Building

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -5-

213 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 2.0

GENERAL METHODOLOGY, LIMITATIONS, AND ASSUMPTIONS 2.1

Report Objectives

The objectives of this Report are to:  Summarize the condition assessment methodology;  Report on significant findings from the condition assessment;  Identify possible methods of rehabilitations, upgrades, replacement, and/or maintenance. It is important to note that this Report is only intended as a general summary based on site observations and that a full building and electrical code review has not been included. 2.2

Review of Background Information

Available background documents, including previous 2015 BCA for Fairmount Home, and select as built drawings, were reviewed. It is noted that existing drawings for the 5 Paramedic stations were unavailable for review at the time of this Report. The following is a summary of background documents reviewed:    

Fairmount Home – Electrical/Mechanical/Architectural as-built drawings (2004) and previous 2015 BCA. Administration Building (Old House) – Previous 2015 BCA. K&P Trial Bridges – Construction Drawings and 2017 OSIM Reports. Palace Road Paramedic Station - 2015 BCA 2.3

Preparation of Inspection Materials

Before conducting the site visits, the JLR Team developed an inspection and assessment data collection system which included working forms for each team member to complete while on-site. Inspection methodology and assessment criteria were also established and a brief team meeting was held before the site visit to ensure each team member thoroughly understood data collection requirements. 2.4

Site Inspection

Detailed visual on-site multi-discipline inspections were undertaken (various locations) on July 29th 2019 and August 1st 2019 at the Paramedic Stations and Howe Island Ferry Building, and August 12th 2019 and August 19th 2019 at the Fairmount Home and County Administration Building, located at 2069 Battersea Rd, Glenburnie. Access to the sites and guidance was provided by Chris McBain from Frontenac Paramedics and Tom Mercer from the County of Frontenac. The inspections completed and data obtained were limited to visual observations and discussion with staff. No special lift devices or ladders were mobilized during the assignment and no destructive or exploratory testing or inspection was carried out. Detailed visual on-site structural inspections were undertaken on August 7th and August 8th of listed K&P Trial Bridges. The inspections completed and data obtained were limited to visual observations. 2.5

Review of Collected Data

Following the site inspections, a review and analysis of the gathered data was undertaken. Each engineering discipline summarized the condition of each major building/equipment component and identified potential options and opinions of probable costs to renew and/or replace certain items. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -6-

214 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 2.6

Limitations

The information provided in this Report is based primarily on visual inspections with non-destructive testing. The conclusions and recommendations in this Report are based on information determined and collected at the time that the inspections were carried out. Additional deficiencies that were not detected or anticipated at the time of the investigation may be encountered during future modifications and/or upgrades. Should conditions change in any aspect at any of the facilities assessed, the conclusions and recommendations in this Report may require modifications. The information contained in this Report reflects the project team’s judgment and interpretation in light of the information available at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this document, or any reliance on decisions that a third party may make based on this document, is the sole responsibility of the third party. 2.7

Assumptions

Due to the nature of the site and the systems and engineering disciplines involved, assumptions were made when undertaking the condition assessment. Some of the assumptions made include: 

Background information provided is assumed to accurately depict the physical attributes of the site;



The assessments were based strictly on visual examinations of readily accessible components and assemblies. No finishes were removed and no destructive or other specialty testing techniques were used;



In some cases where the age of older equipment or assets were unknown, it was assumed to be original to the facility construction or otherwise determined based on discussions with The County;



The assessment of the condition rating of a system is not exact. It is based on limited information and influenced by factors that may occur at some future date. Certain replacements may be advanced or deferred by the County subject to other considerations (i.e. financial, coordination with related work, incorporation into facility-wide upgrades, etc.);



The assessment of the condition of the facility does not include review or identification of potential Ontario Building Code non-compliances or general health and safety issues that may fall under the applicable Ontario Regulations and County of Frontenac policies and practices (e.g., working at heights requirements, rooftop fall arrest anchors, minimum guard heights);



The Opinions of Probable Costs for replacement of the various items are order-of-magnitude only and are based on a Class ‘D’ estimate, generally defined as follows: o Work Definition: A description of the intended solutions with such supporting documentation as is available (definition of project typically in the order of 1% to 5%). o Intended Purpose: Preliminary planning and budgeting o Level of Effort: Limited and expected accuracy could range from -30% to +30%. o Opinion of Probable Costs: Completed using 2019-dollar value; and

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -7-

215 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

All costs, including those for future years, are expressed in 2019 dollars. If these costs are to be used for long-range cash-flow projections, the implications for potential future trends of inflation and interest must be applied accordingly.

For this type of infrastructure, it is typically recommended that a condition assessment be undertaken approximately every five years in order to ensure that information presented is updated accordingly and to account for continually changing conditions.

3.0

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 3.1

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Approach

The project team developed an overall evaluation approach to establish consistency in reporting and to provide the County with a tool that could be used for inventory management and prioritization of identified needs in the future. The template used for this project divides the components of the assessed County facilities into asset classifications as generally illustrated in Table 1. This table demonstrates the hierarchical structure and does not include all components of the system. The full and completed table, found in Appendix A, provides a description, location, manufacturer, year of installation, estimated remaining life, replacement cost, and condition for each attribute of each asset throughout the facility. By utilizing this organizational hierarchy, the County can easily view asset classification within each facility, to a specific asset and attribute within the facility. Additionally, it addresses the condition, any identified need, the cost of implementation of the identified needs, and the proposed year of implementation for each attribute of each asset throughout each facility. The data collected is intended to provide a summary of inventory and valuation at the facility as well as act to aid the County’s ongoing asset management procedures. Table 1: Example Categories in Hierarchical Structure

Level 1: Facility     

Level 2: Class      

Fairmount Home County of Frontenac Administration Office Building Palace Road Ambulance Base Sydenham Ambulance Base Etc. Level 3: Asset

     

Level 4: Attribute      

Building Structure Building Envelope Roof Building Interior Emergency Power System Etc.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

Architectural and Structural HVAC Plumbing Elevators Parking Lots/Lane Ways Etc. Exterior Walls Roof Assembly Slab on Grade Transformers Generator Etc.

September 2019 -8-

216 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 3.2

Condition Rating System

Clear asset evaluation criteria are essential for developing assessment data, as several inspection staff work to collect a single comprehensive and consistent set of information for each asset. The on-site assessment of the facility includes a confirmation of asset/attribute inventory and an assignment of a “condition rating” based on the visually observed physical condition. The physical condition rate scale is shown with definition in Table 2: Condition Rating Criteria, below. Table 2: Condition Rating System

Grade

Replacement Time Frame

Description

Immediate

 Failed or failure imminent. Immediate need to replace most or all of attribute. Hazards exist or attribute cannot be serviced or operated without risk to personnel/public/environment.

0-5 Years

 Poor physical condition – heavy wear and tear, failure is likely in short term. Likely need to replace most or all of attribute within 5 years. No immediate risk, but work required within 5 years to ensure attribute remains operational.

5-10 Years

 Acceptable physical condition – moderate wear and tear, moderate risk of physical failure. Failure unlikely within next 5 years but further deterioration likely and major rehabilitation/replacement required within next 10 years. Minor components or isolated sections of the attribute may need replacement or repair now, but attribute still functions safely at adequate level of service.

Fair

10-20 Years

 Acceptable physical condition – minor wear and tear, minimum risk of physical failure. No substantial deterioration anticipated over the next 5-10 years.

Good

20+ Years

 Acceptable physical condition – minor wear and tear, low risk of physical failure. No substantial deterioration anticipated over the next 10-15 years

Condition

Unacceptable

Poor

Acceptable

3.3

Estimated Remaining Life

The Estimated Remaining Life (ERL) of an attribute is the period from the observed point in time to the time that the attribute may require replacement based on its age. The ERL is strongly correlated with the attribute’s condition rating. Table 3 below outlines the expected or theoretical design life of each asset class used to calculate the ERL. The life expectancies shown are ‘typical’ expectancy for the reviewed facilities. This table and corresponding ERL is used only as a guideline in establishing the condition rating since the function of an attribute in the overall system, the initial system quality, and maintenance attention given to an attribute over its life cycle plays an important role in establishing its condition. In some instances, the actual life cycle of an attribute will greatly exceed J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019 -9-

217 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report its predicted life cycle at the time of initial construction/installation. In other instances, the actual remaining life of an attribute may be less than was initially predicted due to changes in operational parameters, lack of regular preventative maintenance, or faulty components. The final condition rating is based primarily on a review of the attribute condition from visual observations, discussions with operations staff regarding the maintenance program, and a review of background information with consideration to current condition, performance, and expected future use. The ERL is not to be used in isolation to determine the timing for repair and/or replacement of a particular attribute; however, if the attribute could not be fully reviewed (e.g., below grade structures), the attribute was assigned a predicted condition rating based on its age. Table 3: Expected Useful Life Estimations for Each Asset Class

Asset Class

Expected Life (years)

Architectural and Structural

Building Electrical

25-40

Conduit, cabling, cable trays, step down transformers, junction boxes, receptacles, lighting, electrical appurtenances, etc.

20-35

Building systems for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning including hot water systems and boilers, plumbing systems, and fixtures.

Building Mechanical

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

General Description Large scale structural components, concrete works.

September 2019

10 -

218 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 4.0

FAIRMOUNT HOME CONDITION ASSESSMENT 4.1

Overview

The “Fairmount Home” is a long-term care home with 128 suites located at 2069 Battersea Road in Glenburnie, Ontario. The building is part of the larger Fairmount complex that includes the “Old House”, “Garage and Out Buildings”: a residential home converted into an office and two smaller buildings currently used as an equipment garage and storage shed. The Fairmount Home consists of multiple wings connected in a rectangular fashion forming an inner courtyard with additional wings extending to the north and northwest corners. There is an Auditorium building connected to the northeast corner. The Old House is connected to the east of the south wing. Table 4 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Fairmount Home since its original construction in 1968. Table 4: Summary of Historical Fairmount Home Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

1968

Original building construction

1972

Original auditorium construction

2004

Renovation and expansion to the original building

2014

Auditorium rebuilt

The following sections summarize the findings of the condition assessment review for the abovereferenced facility, which should be reviewed in conjunction with Appendix A (detailed inventory of assets/attributes and condition ratings) and Appendix B (photographs). 4.2

Structural / Architectural



The structures are a combination steel and concrete framing. The foundations are cast-in-place concrete. There are three balconies: one off each elevation of the east wing, and one off the west elevation of the west wing. There is also a terrace off the north end of the north wing.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with brick masonry and shingled mansards. The Auditorium is clad with prefabricated fiberglass panels. Windows are typically punched, vinyl framed windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by a combination of flat and sloped roofing assemblies.



The Fairmount Home building has a unique layout and consists of a variety of structural systems. The following is a brief summary of the structural systems taken from past reports and existing drawings:



1968 South Wing o Exterior foundation walls with reinforced concrete strip footings, and interior reinforced concrete piers with spread footings o Reinforced concrete slab-on-grade with concrete topping o Reinforced concrete stairwells o Reinforced concrete slabs supported by metal deck pans and open web steel joists (OWSJ’s) supported by either steel beams and columns, or exterior concrete block walls.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

11 -

219 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

2004 Addition o Reinforced concrete strip footings supporting foundation walls, and reinforced concrete spread footings supporting piers o Reinforced concrete slab-on-grade o Reinforced concrete stairwells and elevator shafts o Ground floor slab (not on grade) consists of hollow core precast slabs supported on steel beams and columns or reinforced concrete walls o Second floor and roof levels consist of steel deck on OWSJ’s supported by steel beams and columns. Additionally, the second-floor slab has a concrete topping.



2014 Auditorium Addition o Reinforced concrete strip footings supporting foundation walls o Reinforced concrete ground floor slab on grade o The superstructure for the 2014 addition consists of steel roof decking on OWSJ’s supported by steel beams and columns. The structure of the existing auditorium appears to be of similar construction to the new addition however structural drawings of the original structure were not provided.



No evidence of building settlement or other poor foundation performance was observed or reported by regular building occupants. The foundation is mostly below grade or covered, however what is observable appears to be in generally good condition. Localized areas at the auditorium and garbage loading bays are in fair to poor condition due to major rusting and deterioration (refer to Photo 4.2.1 and 4.2.2). Repair work is required to restore these areas to an acceptable condition.



The structure is a two-storey building divided into multiple wings with an additional “level 0” below the south section of the building. The level 0 walls are mainly composed of load bearing concrete masonry units which are generally in good condition. The floors, walls and ceilings throughout the rest of building are finished, however select areas such as mechanical and electrical rooms were exposed and allowed for observation of the condition of the structure. In general, the building structure appeared to be in good condition where observable; this is assumed to be representative of the balance. Some minor exceptions are detailed in the Structural Inventory spreadsheet.



Various exterior concrete slabs on grade are generally in good to fair condition. A concrete retaining wall structure is located west of the building around a large generator unit. These walls are in good to fair condition with minor wear. The steel railing around the top of the walls is in fair condition with minor rusting. Concrete bollards with steel covers are located around the generator unit and at either end of a driveway and are in good condition. Concrete pole bases are located throughout the property supporting flag poles and light posts. These concrete bases are in good to fair condition with minor to moderate wear.



The brick masonry at the greenhouse room on the east side of the building is in poor condition as flashing at base of Greenhouse glazing only covers half of precast concrete sill resulting in staining and deterioration of the brick masonry base wall and deterioration at sill joints. It is recommended that the masonry be repaired/repointed and that new flashing be installed that will provide complete coverage of the sill. It is recommended these repairs occur in the immediate future. (Refer to Photo 4.2.3 and Photo 4.2.4).



The exterior brick masonry of the 2004 addition appears to be in good condition overall but has some localized deterioration at the porch on the west side of the building likely due to inadequate

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

12 -

220 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report flashing at the drainage scuppers. It is recommended that the deteriorating masonry and scupper be investigated, cleaned, repaired/repointed and flashing be properly installed to ensure water runoff does not travel down the face or cavity of the masonry. It is also recommended the sloped concrete drainage plane below the patio stones be cleaned as part of regular maintenance to ensure proper drainage. (Refer to Photo 4.2.5 and Photo 4.2.6). 

The exterior vinyl windows throughout the residence floor units appear to be in good condition with no obvious issues. It is recommended replacement of all vinyl windows be budgeted for within the next ten years base on age. (Refer to Photo 4.2.7 and Photo 4.2.8)



The full height wood framed window located at Stairwell S2 at the south elevation of the south wing is over 50 years old and show wear though no failures were reported or observed. Generally, paint is peeling and frame is showing general wear on the exterior. It is anticipated window replacement will be desired within the next ten years for aesthetics and improved performance so it is recommended this replacement be budgeted for. (Refer to Photo 4.2.9, Photo 4.2.10 and Photo 4.2.11)



The metal shingles at the mansard of the 1968 Wing appears to be in acceptable condition but does have localized areas of peeling paint and fading of colour. It is recommended the Metal Shingles on the Mansard Roof be repainted for preventative maintenance. (Refer to Photo 4.2.12)



The asphalt shingles at the mansard roof of the 2004 wing appear to be in acceptable condition on the main steeper plane but the shingles on the dormer windows are showing degranulation and curling likely due the low slope of these areas and resulting increase exposure to sun. It is recommended that shingles be replaced at all dormers in the immediate future. It is also recommended that replacement of shingles on main steeper plane be budgeted for within the next ten years due to age. (Refer to Photo 4.2.13, Photo 4.2.14 and Photo 4.2.15)



The asphalt shingles on the sloped roof over the central portion of the east wind appears to be in acceptable condition for their age. Some degranulation was present. It is recommended shingles will require replacement within ten years based on condition and effective life expectancy. The South facing slope of this central portion shows more advanced aging which is to be expected with the south exposure. It is recommended this south side be monitored and repaired locally as part of general maintenance until replacement of all shingles occurs. (Refer to Photo 4.2.16).



The flat roof areas at the 1968 wing and 2004 addition appear to be in acceptable condition with localized areas of mild degranulation and localized bubbling observed at west side of 1968 wing. It is recommended that flat roofing be replaced within 5-10 years based on life expectancy. Areas included in this replacement would include the 1968 wing, 2004 addition, and the link to the Auditorium (Refer to Photo 4.2.17 and Photo 4.2.18).



Overall the sheet vinyl flooring within residence suites is in fair condition. It was noted sheet vinyl flooring in ground floor suite rooms over slab on grade have over time started to shrink and pull away at the seams, and the appropriate backing supports have not been installed at the floor bases resulting in the potential for holes to be punched through. It was reported that replacement of the floors in these suites is being carried out on a room by room basis with approximately 20 rooms remaining. It is recommended the sheet flooring in the remaining ground suites continue to be replaced over the next 10 years. It is also recommended replacement of sheet flooring within suites other than ground floor slab on grade suites be budgeted for due to age.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

13 -

221 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The carpet flooring in the residence corridors and shared spaces is in generally acceptable condition, but showing signs of wear and generally at the end of its life expectancy. It is recommended carpet flooring be replaced with LVT flooring within the next 5 years to be in keeping with current healthcare facility standards that are tending to move away from the use of carpeted surfaces.



The vinyl tile in the basement corridor appears in good condition with no obvious issues beyond regular wear. It is recommended basement vinyl tile be replaced within 10 years based on effective life remaining and existing condition.



Select location throughout the building have safety slip resistant sheet vinyl flooring that appears in poor to acceptable condition. It is recommended this flooring be replaced within 5 years due to age and associated wear. Basement level: Kitchen and kitchen support areas, various utility rooms. Residence levels: Kitchens and dining service areas.



The carpet in the Paramedic Office at the basement level appears in poor condition showing wear and staining due to age. It is recommended this carpet be replaced within 5 years base on condition and age. 4.3

HVAC



The main heating plant is located in the basement mechanical room and consists of three hot water boilers, expansion tanks, air separators, one set of duplex inline hydronic pumps serving the old house and south wing, another set of duplex inline pumps serving the remainder of the facility, and a chemical treatment system. The boilers have been replaced within the last 5 years and all components including the venting are in good condition. Maintenance staff have reported good operation of these boilers with the exception of a design issue with the burner support. Regular maintenance on pump seals have been performed and the pumps are operating well. A spare of each type of pump is kept in storage which reduces the implications if a pump were to fail. There was appreciable rust on some of the pump flanges which may be due to the high humidity levels in the room. The remainder of the hydronic components including the expansion tank and air separator are in good condition. Surface rust was noted on several other surfaces and equipment in the mechanical room which typically suggests elevated humidity levels. Condensation on cold surfaces should be prevented through additional pipe insulation. Additional ventilation or dehumidification could also be provided in the mechanical room to address this issue.



Two steam boilers in the mechanical room generate humidification steam for the rooftop units. These units have not been in use due to insufficient humidity control and leaking distribution steam traps. It is recommended to decommission these units if not in use and implement alternative solutions for winter humidification to maintain occupant comfort (Refer to Photo 4.3.1).



Four Trane rooftop air handling units provide tempered air (heated or cooled) to the corridors and common spaces in the occupant areas. The return air from the patient rooms is returned to one part of the unit with a heat recovery section which recovers heating or cooling from these air streams to partially temper the outdoor air. The remainder of the heating and cooling is provided through a glycol loop which is heated through a heat exchanger using boiler water or cooled through a DX refrigerant system. The refrigerant system utilizes R-22 refrigerant which will be effectively phased out in Canada under the Montreal protocol by 2020. This will make future repairs and recharging prohibitively costly and eventually unachievable. Regular maintenance activities have been performed on the unit including belt, sheave, and bearing replacements.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

14 -

222 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Maintenance staff have indicated that the units are operating acceptably but have issues with the damper controls which are disconnected and should be serviced. The temperature control for these units is also not adjustable from the building automation system which should be addressed to promote better occupant comfort measures. The rooftop units deliver a constant supply of air to the common spaces which is exhausted through each occupant room. Occupants have the option to enable additional exhaust in their rooms through a timed pushbutton on the thermostat. Several of these exhaust dampers have malfunctioning actuators and should be repaired. It was noted the additional exhaust function is not used frequently by occupants. The typical life expectancy of these units can vary from 15 to 25 years. Due to the good condition of the units, replacement should be expected within the next 10 years. Note additional costs will be incurred if units require recharging with R-22 refrigerant before replacement. There are also the environmental implications for an R-22 leak which should be considered (Refer to Photos 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.4. 

RTU-6 serves the paramedic office area and is heated through a gas fired heating section and cooled through an integral DX refrigeration system. The unit has an economizer section to utilize free cooling during shoulder seasons. The unit is in good condition and has been reported to be operating well. The refrigerant used is R-22 which shares the same concerns as the other rooftop units. The unit was installed in 2007 and the typical life expectancy of these units can vary from 15 to 25 years. Due to the good condition of the units, replacement should be expected within 10 years however additional costs will be incurred if units require recharging with R-22 refrigerant before replacement. There are also the environmental implications for an R-22 leak which should be considered.



AHU-5 serves the kitchen and laundry areas as a makeup air unit complete with a gas fired heating section and DX cooling. The refrigerant used is R-22 which shares the same concerns as the other rooftop units. The condition is similar to the other rooftop units and shares the same recommendation to defer unit replacement to within 10 years based on condition.



All rooftop units are provided with p-traps to drain the condensate from the cooling coil. At the time of the review, all traps were all open upstream of the trap which no longer provides a trap seal. Since the drains are located on the suction side of the supply fan, the fan will draw in outdoor air and reduce the effectiveness of the cooling. Furthermore, as air is drawn in through the pipe, it reduces the amount of condensate that can be discharged which was observed to be backing up in the drain pan. This can cause condensate carry over in the airstream and potential drain pan overflow which can have similar implications as a roof water leak. These p traps should all be restored by capping the upstream “tee” to ensure a trap seal (Refer to Photo 4.3.5).



There are four centrifugal up blast fans located on the roof which exhaust the dishwashers and kitchen exhaust hood. The kitchen exhaust fan was noted to be vibrating excessively which may be due to a damaged shaft. The unit appeared to be in good condition however, the internals of the fan were not accessible. Given the environment the fan is subject to, a reduced service life can be expected. The fan is 15 years old and should be considered for replacement (Refer to Photo 4.3.6).



The rooftop natural gas piping is corroded in spots and should be repainted. There is a gas shut off valve on the roof which has an excessively corroded handle and should be replaced (Refer to Photo 4.3.7).



The Auditorium is ventilated through an interior Trane multizone air handling unit. The unit has a hydronic heating section and DX cooling through a remote condenser. Maintenance staff have

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

15 -

223 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report indicated issues with leaking zone dampers however generally the unit is operating well after 16 years of service. These multizone units have higher service lives than rooftop units in the range of 30 years. It is recommended to keep the unit in service with regular maintenance activities (Refer to Photo 4.3.8). 

Various split system air conditioning units are provided throughout the facility for space cooling. The general condition of these units is good however these units generally have expected service lives in the range of 15-20 years. Considering these units are maintainable with replaceable components it is recommended to retain and service the units until a significant failure arises. Some of the condenser fins were dirty and plugged which should be cleaned to promote better condenser efficiency and operation (Refer to Photo 4.3.9).



Four dedicated split system cooling systems are provided for the two walk in fridges, freezer, and garbage room air conditioning system. The condensers for these systems are located outdoors at grade. The equipment is approaching the end of it’s expected service life and will likely require replacement within the next 5 years (Refer to Photo 4.3.10).



Heating in the building is provided through either perimeter baseboard radiators on Levels 0 and 1, cabinet unit heaters at entrances, or radiant ceiling panels on Level 2. No issues were indicated with these systems and typically operate with a service life in excess of 25 years.



Wall propeller fans are provided in electrical rooms for heat exhaust and are in good condition. There did not appear to be cooling or ventilation for communications rooms which could be added to improve equipment performance and life expectancy if high room temperatures are encountered.



Two oxygen cylinder filling and storage rooms are located on Levels 1 and 2. The Ontario building code has specific requirements for ventilation and fire separations for these rooms in care facilities. It is recommended the County engage a qualified party to review and implement these requirements. 4.4

Plumbing



Domestic cold water is fed from onsite wells into one water reservoir for domestic water use and another for fire water. The domestic water is treated through a chlorinated water treatment system and water softener. A Bell & Gossett water booster skid distributes and boosts the water pressure throughout the facility. One primary water softener supplies softened water to the building, kitchen & laundry, and the reverse osmosis systems. Maintenance staff have indicated the operation of the water softener is no longer satisfactory and should be replaced. The water softener system serving the kitchen and laundry is also no longer satisfactory and is undergoing replacement. The water booster system has 1 offline pump which has priming issues due to the design of the skid system. There is surface rust on both pump casing likely due to the room humidity levels. The facility is reported to operate well without the third pump. A replacement pump could be considered to be added as a backup in case one of the other two pumps requires replacement. Maintenance staff have indicated there have been pinhole leaks in the piping system in the past but have significantly improved with the water source from the new well (Refer to Photo 4.4.1).



Domestic hot water is generated through two 49ºC boilers serving the building fixtures and two 60ºC boilers serving the kitchens and laundry. Each system has two 200-gallon storage tanks, circulating pumps, and miscellaneous components. Two of the 49ºC boilers and one 60ºC boiler have been replaced in the last 5 years and are in good condition. The 4th boiler is reported to be

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

16 -

224 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report operating in a reasonable condition with a replaced heat exchanger section however is approaching the end of it’s service life and should be replaced. The storage tanks appear in good condition and can have an extended service life in excess of 25 years if maintained well (yearly sediment draining, anode rod replacement etc.). A Bell & Gossett domestic hot water recirculation pump in the basement shows signs of a previous leak and substantial corrosion at the pump casing mating flange and should be replaced. Each domestic hot water boiler has an individual fractional horsepower circulating pump which appear to have been replaced with the domestic hot water boiler replacements. It is recommended to replace the fourth circulating pump when the 4th boiler is replaced due to its age and condition (Refer to Photo 4.4.2, Photo 4.4.3, Photo 4.4.4, Photo 4.4.5). 

A fire pump system is located in the basement to provide water to sprinklers and fire hose cabinets. All fire hose cabinets in the facility appear to be in good condition. The fire pumps are tested weekly and are in good condition. Due to the low run time and routine testing, these pumps are expected to last much longer than a typical 20-year service life for an inline centrifugal pump. 4.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems are generally in good condition. Much of the electrical infrastructure was replaced during a renovation in 2004 for the main building and 2014 for the auditorium.



A pad-mounted 27.6 kV-600/347V 1000 kVA transformer, located at the rear of the facility supplies electricity to the building’s main switchboard, Switchboard AAA (refer to Photo 4.5.1).



The main switchboard, Switchboard AAA, is a Siemens 1200A, 347/600V rated switchboard located in the electrical room S-014 (refer to Photo 4.5.2). Switchboard AAA supplies power to local distribution panels, via dry type transformers, located in the Mechanical Room E-000, Kitchen and electrical closets throughout the building.



Building electrical power distribution is separated into Normal and Emergency Power. Normal power is supplied from Distribution Panel DP-BEAA1. Emergency Power earmarked loads are supplied from Switchboard AAA under normal circumstances, in the event of a loss of utility power Emergency power is supplied from a 250kW Generac Power Systems generator via an Automatic Transfer Switch, ATS-01 (refer to Photo 4.5.3). A separate transfer switch is utilized specifically for an on-site facility fire pump.



A 600-120/208V transformer is located in each electrical closet to step the 600V, supplied from Switchboard AAA, down to 120/208V for local distribution panel boards which then distribute power to local devices (refer to Photos 4.5.4 and 4.5.5).



A Photo Voltaic system was installed in 2013 and appears to be in good condition (refer to Photo 4.5.6). The system supplies power to the electrical grid, but it is not used as a supplemental power source for the facility.



Lighting fixtures appear to be in fair condition, some fixtures require replacement or repaired. The majority of lighting fixtures were installed during renovations in 2004 for the main building and 2014 for the auditorium. Individual bulbs should be replaced as required. Some fluorescent light fixtures are yellowing, to rectify this bulbs and lens should be replaced. An effort to swap out existing fluorescent tubes with LED equivalents has already been initiated by the owner for the majority of 2x4 fixtures.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

17 -

225 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

During the 2014 renovation two (2) pieces of equipment were installed on the roof top. According to the Ontario Electrical Safety Code (OESC) requires rooftop receptacles to be installed within 7.5m of the rooftop equipment. Currently the receptacles installed for these pieces of equipment are installed are 15A receptacles (refer to Photo 4.5.7). Receptacles and upstream infrastructure should be modified to 20A GFCI equivalent to meet the OESC standards.



Receptacles in Activity Room S-137 and Maintenance Shop S-010 are within 1.5m of a sink (refer to Photo 4.5.8). According to the Ontario Electrical Safety Code (OESC) receptacles within 1.5m of sinks shall be protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI). Receptacles are to be changed to a GFCI receptacle. Cost of changing receptacles is minimal.



Multiple electrical boxes do not have covers installed. The installation of box covers could be accomplished for a minimal cost (refer to Photo 4.5.9).



Exit signs appear to be aged and are showing signs of wear. As of January 1, 2014, all new buildings and major renovations are required to install the new “Running Man” Exit signage. The running man exit signs are not currently required for this building. If a major renovation, as defined by the Ontario Building Code (OBC) occurs, or a new building is constructed, then the “Running Man” signs will be required. 4.6



Elevators

There are two elevators serving the Fairmount Home; the service elevator in the west wing and the main lobby elevator in the east wing, both understood to have been installed with the 2004 addition. The main lobby elevator was retrofitted in 2013 and the service elevator was retrofitted in 2014. The scope of the retrofit included replacement of control panels and interior/exterior call buttons. Hydraulics were not included in these upgrades. It is understood the elevators are maintained by the manufacturer. Based on age replacement is not expected within a ten-year window. Assessment is based on age alone as specialist review was not requested as part of the scope of work for this assessment. 4.7

Parking Lots / Lane Ways



Asphalt driveways and parking lots are located around the east, north and west sides of the building. The asphalt is generally in acceptable condition showing moderate to severe cracking in locations. The entrance lane ways and main parking lot have areas in poor condition due to heavier use. A detailed pavement condition assessment of the driveways and parking areas should be undertaken to determine the extent of necessary pavement rehabilitation or replacement. Certain areas appear to require full depth asphalt replacement due to extreme deterioration while other areas may require milling and patching. Other pavement rehabilitation techniques that may be considered include crack sealing or localized patching.



Concrete sidewalks and curbs are located around the building perimeter and along the edges of the parking lots and driveways. The concrete is generally in good condition with localized areas of cracking and delamination (refer to Photo 4.7.1). Localized repairs should be made to the sidewalks and curbs within the next 10 years. 4.8



Life Safety

The fire alarm system control panel is a Siemens FireFinder XLS System located in the auditorium. The fire alarm control panel monitors smoke and heat detectors throughout the building. Manual

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

18 -

226 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report pull stations are installed near building exits and stairwells. The fire alarm system is in good condition. Siemens regular inspects fire alarm system and will flag issues that must be addressed. Table 5: Summary of Fairmount Home Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Foundation – Perimeter - Generally good (only some was observable), localized area @ auditorium was rusting. Fair/poor near garbage loading area, localized major rust/deterioration, some repairs required.

$10,000

Exterior Walls – Exterior/2004 Addition - Flashing at base of Greenhouse glazing only covers half of sill resulting in masonry staining and damage at sill joints. Stone Sill requires new flashing to provide complete coverage and repointing of the brick masonry.

$3,000

Exterior Walls – Exterior/2004 Addition Investigate, clean, and repair balcony drainage at west balcony. Lack of appropriate flashing at scupper appears to be the cause of deteriorated masonry joints. Re-flashing, masonry repairs and cleaning of debris from underneath patio stones recommended pending investigation.

$8,000

Exterior Windows – Exterior / Residence Floors Acceptable - No Obvious Issues. Recommend Budgeting for Replacement due to age.

$400,000

Exterior Windows – Stairwell S2 - Acceptable Recommend Budgeting for Replacement to improve performance and aesthetics.

$32,400

Roof Assembly – Exterior/1968 Wing - Paint showing wear - Recommend Re-Painting

$25,000

Roof Assembly – Exterior/2004 Addition Mansard Roof - Acceptable - showing acceptable wear for age - Recommend budgeting for replacement based on effective life expectancy.

$180,000

Roof Assembly – Exterior/2004 Addition Mansard Roof - Shingles at dormer windows showing degranulation and curling. Recommend replacement of shingles at all dormers.

$7,000

Roof Assembly – Exterior/2004 Addition/Sloped Roof - Fair - no obvious issues - Recommend budgeting for replacement based on effective life expectancy. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$44,200

September 2019

19 -

227 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

Roof Assembly - Exterior/Flat Roof/1968 Wing/2004 Addition - Acceptable condition Recommend replacement due to age.

Roof Assembly - Exterior/Flat Roof/1968 Wing/2004 Addition - Roofing is “bubbling” at West Side of Renovated Wing (gridlines 1x to 4x) Roof Assembly - Exterior/Flat Roof/1968 Wing/2004 Addition - Budgeting for replacement based on age recommended. Water damage at gypsum wall board base at Auditorium rear exit vestibule. Recommend repairs as part of general maintenance with investigation of source of water at time of repair. Interior Floors – Ground Suite Floors - It was noted sheet vinyl flooring in these rooms have started to shrink and pull away at the seams, and the appropriate supports have not been installed at the floor bases. It is noted that replacement of the floors in these suites is being carried out on a room by room basis with approximately 20 rooms remaining.

$10,000

$680,000

$100,000

Interior Floors – Basement - Acceptable condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$18,500

Interior Floors - Ground Floor/Second Floor Corridors/Shared Spaces - Poor condition Recommend replacement due to age.

$275,000

Interior Floors - Basement Floor / Paramedic Offices - Poor condition - Recommend replacement due to age.

$35,000

Interior Floors – Basement/Ground Floor/Second Floor - Condition ranges from poor to acceptable. Acceptable condition - Recommend replacement due to age.

$28,000

Interior Floors – Ground Floor / Second Floor (Residents rooms) - Condition appears acceptable. Recommend replacement within 10 years based on age.

$410,000

Interior Ceiling - Basement/Ground Floor/Second Floor - Poor - Generally functional condition Recommend replacement due to age and condition.

$152,600

Interior Ceiling - Basement/Ground Floor/Second Floor - Poor - Ceiling tiles at all kitchens generally

$16,975

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

5 to 10 Years

September 2019

20 -

228 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate stained from cooking activities. Replacement.

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Recommend HVAC

Fridge A/C Unit – Basement Fridge A-015B

$12,000

Fridge A/C Unit – Basement Fridge A-015C

$12,000

Freezer A/C Unit – Basement Freezer

$16,000

A/C Unit - Basement Garbage Room S-022

$14,000

Unit Heater - Basement Garbage Room S-023 Poor visual condition.

$4,000

Condenser Unit – Basement Exterior - Costs included with indoor unit

A/C Unit - W-106 & W-206

$4,000

Condenser – Exterior N-142A

$6,000

60C Domestic Boiler #2 – Mechanical Room Some rust on pump discharge.

$20,000

Mixing Valve – Mechanical Room

Rooftop N G Piping – Rooftop - Noticeable rust in locations. Valves & Handles rusted and could be an issue to operate. Paint recommended as part of regular maintenance.

P1 – Mechanical Room - Rust on pump casing

$2,500

P2 – Mechanical Room

$2,500

P3 – Mechanical Room

$2,500

P4 – Mechanical Room

$2,500

Kitchen Exhaust Fan - Rooftop

$2,500

EF-2 - Rooftop

$1,500

Dryer Vents - Basement Laundry S-023A - Worn, lint should be cleaned.

Exterior Louvre – Corridor E-200 - Galvanized with paint which is chipping.

$500

EF-3 - Rooftop

$1,500

EF-4 - Rooftop

$1,500

EF-1 - Rooftop

$1,500 Plumbing

Soft Water Filter – Mechanical Room - Poor operation & reliability, currently under contract to replace.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$8,000

September 2019

21 -

229 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

Domestic Booster Expansion Tank – Basement Mechanical Room - Rust through paint.

5 to 10 Years $6,000

Domestic Hot Water Recirculation pump Basement Mechanical Room - Rusted with previous leak.

$2,000

Electrical Cooler #1 Disconnect – Exterior - Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Garbage Cooler Disconnect – Exterior Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Cooler #2 Disconnect – Exterior - Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Freezer Cooler Disconnect – Exterior - Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Conduit and Wiring – Various - Replace 15A rooftop receptacles with 20A GFCI receptacles.

$450

Conduit and Wiring – Various - Install GFCI receptacles at receptacle locations within 1.5m of sinks.

$500

Elevators Not Applicable Parking Lot / Lane Ways Parking / Driveway – Entrance Lane and Main Parking Lot – Asphalt in generally poor condition

moderate to severe cracking in places. Perform detailed asphalt condition assessment followed by rehabilitation and replacement strategies. . Concrete Sidewalks / Curbs – Various Generally good, localized cracking/delamination requiring repair work

$600,000

$400,000

$10,000

Life Safety (includes generator) Fire Alarm System – Smoke / Heat Detector Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Emergency Lighting System – Exit Signs Appear to have some wear and tear.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$3,500

$15,000

September 2019

22 -

230 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

$18,950

$1,208,075

$2,363,100

Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage. TOTAL (1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

23 -

231 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 5.0

ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT 5.1

Overview

The “Old House” is the former country home of Colonel Fair located at 2069 Battersea Road in Glenburnie, Ontario. The building is part of the larger Fairmount complex that includes the “Fairmount Home”, “Garage and Out Buildings”: a long-term care home, equipment garage and storage building, respectively. The home was converted into an office building in about 1968, when the “Fairmount Home” long-term care home was constructed. The Old House is connected to the east end of the south wing of the Fairmount Home via a link structure constructed in 1968. The Old House is believed to have been constructed in about 1925. Table 6 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Administration Building since its original construction in 1925. Table 6: Summary of Historical Administration Building Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

1925

Original construction

1968

Converted to an office building; structure linked to Fairmount Home

2010

EIFS installed; asphalt singles replaced; 2 (two) basement windows replaced

2011

Windows in link replaced; reception area finishes replaced

The following sections summarize the findings of the condition assessment review for the abovereferenced facilities, which should be reviewed in conjunction with Appendix A (detailed inventory of assets/attributes and condition ratings) and Appendix B (photographs). 5.2

Structural / Architectural



The structure has a wood-framed superstructure on a combination of concrete and stone foundations.



The exterior walls are clad with an Exterior Insulation Finishing System. Windows are primarily punched, vinyl framed with double-glazed vision glass. The building is covered by a combination of flat and sloped roofing assemblies.



The foundation walls are composed primarily of stone masonry with some areas of brick and concrete block and are in fair to poor condition. Moderate deterioration of the stone masonry and mortar is present, and localized areas show signs of major deterioration of the mortar (Refer to Photos 5.2.1 and 5.2.2). Rehabilitation efforts may need to be undertaken in the near future to maintain the existing foundation of the building.



The basement concrete floor slab is approximately 100 mm thick and is in fair to poor condition due to moderate to severe wear throughout, moderate cracking, and a rough and uneven surface. Concrete piers in the basement are supporting steel columns. Of the five piers, one is in good condition, one is in fair condition and three are in poor condition due to moderate to severe concrete deterioration (Refer to Photo 5.2.3). The steel columns and baseplates supporting the interior of the building are in good condition with no apparent issues.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

24 -

232 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The floors, walls and ceilings on the first and second floors are all finished however there are no apparent issues with the structural elements. The railing on the second-floor roof is only 600 mm high (refer to Photo 5.2.4) and should be replaced with a railing system that conforms to Ontario Building Code requirements. The top floor is used as attic space only and the floor structure is exposed. The floor structure consists of 2x12 timber joists and is generally in poor condition. However, this space is currently not being used as working or storage space.



The exterior foundation walls consist of stone masonry around the perimeter of the building and is in generally fair condition with an isolated poor area at a concrete lintel above one of the basement windows which has experienced concrete spalling and corrosion of reinforcing steel and thus requires repair (Refer to Photo 5.2.5). At the front entrance, the stone masonry pillar pedestals are in poor condition due to significant deterioration of mortar and will require rebuilding (Refer to Photo 5.2.6). The concrete pillar pedestals at the back of the building are in good condition. In front of the building, the masonry retaining wall along the driveway is in fair condition with some cracking and delamination at the top of the wall, typically located at the cast-in railing posts. The railing along the top of the retaining wall is in good condition with some minor rusting. The concrete sidewalks around the property are generally in fair condition. The exterior concrete pads located around the property are in good to fair condition with minor wear. One pad on the east side of the building is in poor condition and requires remedial work (Refer to Photo 5.2.7). The concrete light post supports are generally in good condition.



The West exterior door from the Boardroom appears to be in poor condition as it has sidelights and transom windows that show signs of failing window seals. The paint finish at wood jambs is also failing. It is recommended this door with sidelights and transom be replaced based on condition, age, and for improved performance. (Refer to Photo 5.2.8 and Photo 5.2.9).



The North and South residential style entrance doors with sidelight and transom windows are in acceptable condition. Though the doors are at the end of their expected service life, it is understood they experience very low traffic. It is recommended replacement of the doors be budgeted for within 10 years. (Refer to Photo 5.2.10).



The exterior wood door on east elevation is in poor condition showing extensive wear to paint finish. Due to low traffic/use it is recommended this door be re-painted as part of regular maintenance to extend the life of the door. (Refer to Photo 5.2.11).



Interior flooring is a mix of carpeting in office and corridor areas and vinyl plank flooring in the kitchenette area and appears to be in acceptable to good condition. Carpet to the rear of the building on the ground floor appears to be older that the rest of the carpeting and shows wear from age but still in acceptable condition. It is anticipated all carpeting will require replacing within ten years for aesthetic reasons.



Exterior vinyl windows appear in acceptable condition with no obvious issues and show appropriate wear for age. Recommend replacement within 10 years based on age.



Paint at aluminum clad wood single pane/storm pane windows in the board room showing wear from age. It is recommended windows be repainted in the short term as part of general maintenance. It is recommended these windows be replaced within 5 years based on probable age and low performance of single pane. (Refer to Photo 5.2.12).



The sills and base walls at aluminum clad wood single pane/storm pane windows in the board room (South Wall) have localized water damage likely due to failing exterior caulking at the

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

25 -

233 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report windows. It is recommended repairs to exterior window caulking and to interior finishes be carried out in the immediate future. (Refer to Photo 5.2.12, Photo 5.2.13, Photo 5.2.14, and Photo 5.2.15). 

The interior ceilings (potentially Gypsum Wall Board or Lath and Plaster) appear in good condition though there is localized water damage in the East office at the corner of the chimney. It is recommended localized ceiling be repaired and flat roof detailing above be inspected to identify source of leak. This area of the building is one storey with a flat roof above. (Refer to Photo 5.2.16). 5.3

HVAC



The ground floor and second floor are heated through hydronic hot water radiators located along the perimeter of the building. These radiators are essentially pipes with fin sections and covers and are not expected to require replacement in the near future. All radiators could benefit from a coil cleaning to increase heating performance. The radiators are controlled through a mix of pneumatic thermostats and thermostatic valves which appear to be in good condition however as the valves actuate regularly, they can be more prone to failure and may require replacement as a part of regular maintenance. Servicing for pneumatic control valves is becoming more specialized and scarcer. It was noted there are several uninsulated hot water pipe risers on the ground floor which can have surface temperatures in excess of 76ºC which can pose a burning hazard. These risers should be insulated to protect occupants from accidental contact (Refer to Photo 5.3.1).



A 3/4 hp reciprocating air compressor and refrigerated dryer located in the basement provide compressed dry air for use in the pneumatic control system. This system was indicated as recently replaced and is in good condition. Generally pneumatic control systems are energy intensive, prone to failure, harder to service, and less responsive. These valves could be optimized by replacement with a direct digital control system (DDC) or replaced with thermostatic radiator valves (Refer to Photo 5.3.2).



The ground floor is air conditioned through an indoor Unico fan coil unit with a high velocity duct distribution system. The fan was in good condition and did not have any significant issues reported by maintenance staff. The unit delivers a constant supply of conditioned air to each ground floor space and is controlled by a single thermostat in the ground floor corridor. This does not provide individual control of space temperature for offices which may result in comfort issues for occupants during the cooling season. It was noted the basement duct mains are not insulated which will result in increased air temperatures delivered to each space. It was also noted there was a branch duct leaking in the basement storage room which should be patched. Additional split system air conditioners with outdoor condensers are provided throughout the building which are reported to not be in use after the installation of the high velocity air conditioning duct system. During the time of the assessment, the meeting room air conditioner was in use which should be retained due to the high shift in space occupancies and the number of windows and skylights in the space. The remainder of the AC units should be decommissioned properly if not required to prevent any potential refrigerant leaks.



The second floor is air conditioned through a fan coil unit located in the attic space. A remote condenser is located on the roof adjacent to the link between the old house and Fairmount home. The unit uses R-22 refrigerant which will be effectively phased out in Canada under the Montreal protocol by 2020. This will make future repairs and recharging prohibitively costly and eventually unachievable. This unit was also noted to be approximately 21 years old and in fair to poor condition. Due to the age of the unit, the space comfort complaints, and the refrigerant issue we would recommend replacing this unit (Refer to Photo 5.3.3 & Photo 5.3.4).

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

26 -

234 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 5.4

Plumbing



The building plumbing system is serviced by the domestic water plant located in the basement of Fairmount home. All copper plumbing piping is concealed by insulation containing asbestos and could not be assessed. Based on discussions with maintenance staff there have not been significant issues with pipe leaks in this building. A 6000W electric hot water tank is located in the basement of the old house to boost the domestic water temperature. This appeared to be installed recently and is in good condition.



The drainage piping in the building is generally cast iron or copper and appeared to be in good condition. During the assessment, portions of the basement slab was excavated to repair the building drain. 5.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems are generally in good condition. Originally built in the early 1900s, the Old House has undergone multiple electrical renovations.



Electricity is delivered to the Old House building via Switchboard DP-2P located in Fairmount Home. Multiple electrical panels in the Old House’s basement distribute power throughout the building (refer to Photo 5.5.1).



In 2004, a 45kW Generac Power systems standby generator was installed to supply emergency power, in the event of utility power loss, to the Old House via an automatic transfer switch (refer to Photo 5.5.2).



In general interior and exterior lighting systems are in fair condition and should be replaced as required, some individual bulb replacement is required. Some fluorescent light fixtures are yellowing, to rectify this bulbs and lens should be replaced. Many of the lighting fixtures were replaced during a renovation in 2004.



On the building exterior a cable chase for condensing units is damaged and requires repair (refer to Photo 5.5.3). Condenser Unit flex conduit is damaged, it is recommended to have this repaired (refer to Photo 5.5.4). Condenser Unit disconnects, conduit and wiring is weathered and it is recommended to be replaced within 10 years.



A receptacle in the lobby trips the circuit breaker when the window mounted air conditioning unit is running (refer to Photo 5.5.5). It is recommended that air conditioners are supplied with a dedicated circuit to prevent additional loads tripping circuit breakers.



As of January 1, 2014, all new buildings and major renovations are required to install the new “Running Man” Exit signage. The running man exit signs are not currently required for this building. If a major renovation, as defined by the Ontario Building Code (OBC) occurs, or a new building is constructed, then the “Running Man” signs will be required.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

27 -

235 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Table 7: Summary of Administration Building Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Foundation – Basement - Fair-poor condition. Some moderate deterioration of stone mortar. Some major deterioration of mortar in isolated locations.

$50,000

Slab-on-grade – Basement - Fair-poor condition. Moderate to heavy wear throughout, moderate cracking, and rough/uneven surface.

$15,000

Exterior Foundation Walls – Perimeter Generally fair condition. Isolated poor location concrete lintel @ window sill requires repair.

$3,000

Concrete Piers – Basement/Back Entrance Concrete piers supporting steel columns in basement. 1 good, 1 fair, 3 poor. Moderate to heavy deterioration of concrete. Concrete piers supporting back entrance canopy. 2 fair - minor to moderate.

$5,000

Ceiling / Floor Joists – Floor of Attic - Generally poor condition. Space is being used for M&E routing only.

Exterior Pads – Various - 1 pad @ east of building is in poor condition, needs replacing

$3,000

Pillar Supports - Front Entrance - Poor condition

significant deterioration, needs replacing or repair

$15,000

Exterior Doors – Exterior/North and South Acceptable - Doors are at the end of their expected service life but experience very low traffic. Recommend budgeting for replacement within 10 years.

$2,500

Exterior Doors – Exterior/Boardroom - Paint failing and seals of sidelights and transom windows showing signs of failing. Recommend budgeting for replacement of entire door unit for improved performance.

$2,000

Exterior Doors – Exterior/east Small Room Repainting as part of regular maintenance is recommended to extend the life of the door.

Exterior Windows – Exterior / Ground Floor / Second Floor - Acceptable - No obvious issues Showing appropriate wear for age. Recommend replacement within 10 years based on age. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$41,000

September 2019

28 -

236 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate Exterior Windows – Exterior/Boardroom Acceptable - showing wear - Recommend replacement within 5 years based on probable age and low performance single pane. Exterior Windows – Exterior/Boardroom Caulking failing at exterior, Paint Chipping, interior GWB sills showing water damage. Repairs recommended.

0 to 5 Years $20,600

$3,000

Roof Assemblies - Exterior / Flat Roofs / Various

Acceptable - Replacement recommendation based on age of installations.

$30,000

Rooftop Railing – Flat Roofs / Balconies – Railings only 600 mm high. Do not meet code as guardrails. Interior Ceilings – First Floor - East Office - Water damage at ceiling at chimney. Localized ceiling repairs required. Indicator of potential roof leak at flat roof above. Recommend investigation and repairs of underlying issue.

5 to 10 Years

$20,000

$2,000

Interior Floors – First Floor - Finished surface no obvious issues - Older Carpet to rear of building showing some wear (aesthetic). Carpets in generally fair condition. Recommend replacement of all carpet within 10 years based on age.

$40,000

HVAC Split A/C Unit – Meeting Room – Functional.

$3,000

Fan Coil Unit – Attic - Condenser not accessible.

$6,000

Plumbing Not Applicable Electrical Conduit and Wiring – Various – Exterior cable chase and cables are damaged to the Condenser Units. Replace within 5 years based on condition rating

$1,600

Distribution System – Exterior A/C Disconnect Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$750

Fire Alarm System – Smoke Detector - Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$1,500

Elevators J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

29 -

237 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

$110,200

$149,750

Not Applicable Parking Lot / Lane Ways Not Applicable TOTAL

$5,000

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

30 -

238 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 6.0

PALACE ROAD AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 6.1

Overview

The property at 250 Palace Road in Kingston, Ontario includes a single-storey Ambulance Station with four garage-bays for ambulance vehicles and common interior spaces for the ambulance staff. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 3,800ft² and was constructed in about 1988. Table 8 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Palace Road Ambulance Station since its original construction in 1989. Table 8: Summary of Historical Palace Road Ambulance Base Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

1988

Original construction

2009

Extensive Renovation:

Structural modifications (beams and columns) to accommodate the installation of four new garage bay doors and a new concrete slab-on-grade in the garage
Localized brick masonry repairs
Installation of new concrete window sills
Replacement of all windows, excluding the windows at the ends of the corridor
Replaced the south side flat roof
Installed an emergency generator
Installed new HVAC equipment including a rooftop unit, heat recovery ventilator and radiant tube heaters in the garage
Installed a new domestic hot water tank heater
Replaced most domestic water plumbing
Replaced above-grade sanitary drainage piping
Installed a new trench drain in the garage
Replaced all electrical wiring in the garage and 50% elsewhere
Replaced all light fixtures

2010

Construction of new sloped roof structure above Garage and Corridor.

2010

Installation of Solar Power Generation System including roof top solar Panels.

Structural / Architectural



The structure is a combination of steel and wood-framed roof structures on a combination of steel beams and columns and concrete block supporting walls. The foundation walls are concrete block.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with brick masonry. Windows are typically punched, aluminum-clad wood framed windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by a combination of flat and sloped roofing assemblies. The roof structure is a combination of OWSJ, engineered wood truss, plywood sheathing and shingles above the Garage and Corridor.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

31 -

239 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Above the common areas the roof structure is understood to consist of wood joists, roof decking (type unknown) and roofing assembly. 

No evidence of building settlement or other poor foundation performance was observed or reported by regular building occupants. The building foundation is below grade and generally could not be observed. A crack in the asphalt at the North East corner of the building where the concrete apron slab abuts the foundation has resulted in isolated deterioration of the concrete foundation (refer to Photo 6.2.1). A cavity has formed that can hold water which will result in expedited deterioration over time. Repair work in this area is recommended.



The building consists of a one-storey office space and a high ceiling, four-vehicle ambulance garage. Exterior wall construction for both the office space and garage is load bearing concrete block with a brick veneer. The roof structure in the garage is open web steel joists (OWSJ) and steel deck; the ceiling in the remainder of the building is finished with drywall or acoustic ceiling tiles so the roof structure could not be observed in these areas. The flooring in the garage and adjacent storage and utility rooms is exposed concrete slab on grade. These areas have experienced minor cracking and show signs of previous repair work. The floors in the office space have been finished with tile so the underlying floor slab could not be observed.



Structural columns with steel flashing are located between the overhead doors in the garage. The flashing around the columns is in acceptable condition and is showing signs of moderate rusting around the bases, likely due to exposure to de-icing salts (Refer to Photo 6.2.2). Bollards located outside of the garage between the overhead doors are in fair condition and show light to moderate rusting. The steel lintels above the window frames in the exterior walls of the office space are in fair condition and show light to moderate rusting.



A steel guardrail is located on the roof of the office space and is in poor condition. The steel has experienced light to moderate rusting, several of the support posts are not connected to the roof due to missing anchor bolts, and a weld on the ladder brace has broken (Refer to Photos 6.2.3 and 6.2.4). It is recommended that this guardrail be repaired or replaced immediately as its current condition does not meet the standards of the Ontario Building Code.



The exterior brick masonry appears to be in good condition generally but localized deterioration of mortar joints is present at various locations on the south side of the building. Two areas on the main south façade show minor deterioration and it is recommended this wall be assessed and repointed as part of regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 6.2.5, Photo 6.2.6, and Photo 6.2.7). The masonry around the window located at the south east corner of the building (Crew Room) shows advanced deterioration and it is recommended the masonry be assessed and repaired in as required in the immediate future. (Refer to Photo 6.2.8, Photo 6.2.9). Frontenac Paramedics Logistics Superintendent noted other localized brick repairs have recently been carried out on the south elevation above the utility room due to spalling of brick at this location.



The four exterior overhead doors appear in fair condition. The Superintendent of Logistics Frontenac Paramedics noted that frequent ongoing maintenance is required due to frequency of use. It is recommended replacement be budgeted for within 10-year window due to age and frequency of use.



The original wood-framed fixed windows set around the east and west entrance doors at either end of the corridor are in fair condition but it is anticipated replacement will be desired within 10 years due to age and for improved performance. Caulking and Painting is recommended as part of ongoing maintenance. (Refer to Photo 6.2.10).

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

32 -

240 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The flat roofing at south side of building appears to be in fair condition showing appropriate wear for its age. No leakage has been reported. Based on age it is recommended replacement be budgeted for within 10-year window. (Refer to Photo 6.2.11). 6.3

HVAC



The south portion of the building is served by a rooftop Carrier Weather-Master air handling unit which provides gas heating, and direct expansion (DX) cooling through a ducted air system. The unit is equipped with an economizer which allows for free cooling during periods of cool outdoor air temperatures. The interior components of the unit were inaccessible however the unit generally appeared to be in good condition. The cooling capacity of the unit is likely reduced due to the plugged condenser coils which should be cleaned. Occupants indicate the building is generally uncomfortable which may be due to the fundamental design of the ventilation system or a control/balancing issue which should be investigated in the future to increase occupant comfort (Refer to Photo 6.3.1).



The ambulance bays are ventilated when required though a CO sensor and wall mounted exhaust fan. Makeup air is provided through an exterior louver ducted into the bays. The bays are heated through two infrared gas heaters controlled by a local thermostat. Ceiling fans are also installed in the bays to promote air mixing and reduce stratification. All noted systems appear to be in good condition (Refer to Photo 6.3.2).



The utility room is ventilated through a small exhaust fan and contains the water heater and plumbing equipment. An electrical cabinet unit heater is provided in the medical storage room and is in good working order. It was noted the medical storage room contains oxygen cylinder storage which may require additional ventilation to conform to the Ontario Fire Code. It is recommended the County have a qualified party review the requirements for oxygen storage within the facility.



Washrooms are provided with an exhaust fan ducted to the exterior. These fans are concealed however appear to be functioning adequately. 6.4

Plumbing



The ambulance bays are drained through trench drains which occupants have indicated frequently backs up during wash downs. It is recommended to rod/flush these lines to determine if they are restricted or if the issue is a result of undersized or improperly vented drainage. The condition of the trench drain grating is good with minor surface rust.



A cabinet within the ambulance bays contains a backflow preventer on the incoming municipal water system with a pressure tank which are both in good condition. A flange connecting to the water meter was rusted and may be leaking. Two manual mixing valves and hose reel stations are located within the ambulance bays and are in good condition (Refer to Photo 6.4.1).



Domestic hot water is heated through an A.O Smith Cyclone gas water heater located in the utility room in good condition. It was noted the tank storage temperature was set to 120ºF. Good design practice involved storing domestic hot water at a higher temperature to mitigate the risk of Legionella. A mixing valve is then incorporated on the discharge to cool the domestic hot water to a safer temperature to prevent scalding (Refer to Photo 6.4.2).

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

33 -

241 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

Exterior gas piping at the gas meter and exterior generator is rusting and should be repainted. A local reverse osmosis & water purification system is provided in the kitchen and is in good condition.



Eye washes are provided in the ambulance bay and utility room and are in good condition however are both missing sections of insulation. 6.5

Electrical



Generally all electrical elements of this building appear to be in good condition. The garage and 50% of the corridor, kitchen and lounge were re-wired in 2009.



The main disconnect is a Square D 200A Heavy Duty Safety Switch with a Square D 200A, 120/240V main panel board (refer to Photo 6.5.1). A Generac QuietSource series standby generator, installed in 2009, provides emergency backup power, in the event of utility power loss, via an automatic transfer switch (refer to Photo 6.5.2).



Electrical service conduit and weather head are not properly secured to hydro pole (refer to Photo 6.5.3). Additional strapping should be considered.



Photo-voltaic (PV) array is located on the roof. The PV generation system was installed at the Palace Rd. site in 2010 and appears to be in good condition (refer to Photo 6.5.4). The system supplies power to the electrical grid, but is not utilized as a supplement power source for the building.



Interior lighting is a variety of wall sconces, T8 fluorescent lamps and recessed pot lights. Exterior lighting fixtures are a mixture of pot lights and LED wall packs. Light fixtures appear to be in fair condition and should be replace/repaired as required. Some fixtures require bulb replacement (refer to Photo 6.5.5).



A while-in-use weatherproof cover is missing for a receptacle on the building’s exterior (refer to Photo 6.5.6). It is recommended that this cover is replaced.



Parking Lots / Lane Ways

The asphalt parking lot and concrete apron/walkway are in fair condition and have experienced minor cracking. The parking lot shows signs of light wear and the walkway has localized areas of deterioration.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

34 -

242 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Table 9: Summary of Palace Road Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Foundation – Below Grade / Full Structure Isolated deterioration at NE corner of building

$5,000

Columns – Interior / Between Overhead Doors Acceptable - moderate rusting at bases (exposed to salt)

$10,000

Guardrail – Exterior / Office Roof - Poor - several connection bolts missing at post feet, light to moderate rust, weld on ladder brace has let go. Exterior Walls – Exterior - Localized Masonry Repairs required at various areas of south façade.

$20,000

$2,000

Exterior Doors – Exterior / Corridor Ends Acceptable - showing signs of wear, painting recommended as part of routine maintenance. Though at their expected service life there have been no reported concerns. The County may want to consider replacement to bring entrance glazing up to current performance standards. Caulking - Fair - showing signs of wear

$23,000

Exterior Overhead Doors – Exterior Garage Acceptable - Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be anticipated within 10 year window.

$10,000

Roof Assembly – Exterior/Flat Roof - Acceptable

Moderate wear shown for age. No concerns reported from user group. Anticipated Replacement within ten years due to age.

$18,000

HVAC DHW Pump – Utility Room

$1,000

DHWT – Utility Room

$7,000 Plumbing

Not Applicable Electrical (includes generator) Not Applicable Parking Lot / Lane Ways Not Applicable TOTAL

$2,000

$20,000

$74,000

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

35 -

243 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 7.0

SYDENHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 7.1

Overview

The property at 4264 Stage Coach Road in Sydenham, Ontario includes a single-storey Ambulance Station with two garage-bays for ambulance vehicles and common interior spaces for the ambulance staff. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 3,000ft² and was constructed in about 1981. Table 10 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Sydenham Ambulance Base since its original construction in 2011. Table 10: Summary of Historical Sydenham Ambulance Base Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

2011

Original building construction (No additional upgrades reported)

Structural / Architectural



The structure is wood-framed structure on poured concrete foundation walls.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with vinyl siding with a stone base on the front and sides. Windows are typically punched, vinyl frame windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by sloped roofing assemblies with metal roofing. The two garage bays have two front overhead metal panel doors and two rear overhead metal panel doors.



No evidence of building settlement or other poor foundation performance was observed or reported by regular building occupants. The concrete foundation is mostly below grade, however what is observable appears to be in good condition.



The building consists of a single storey living/office space and a two-vehicle ambulance garage. The wall structure is not exposed so could not be observed. The exterior walls and the inside of the garage are finished with corrugated sheet metal and masonry veneer. The roof structure is timber framing and is in good condition with no signs of deterioration. The exterior of the roof is cladded with corrugated sheet metal. The floors in the garage, storage room and utility room are exposed concrete slab-on-grade. The floors in the remainder of the building are slab-on-grade finished with tile. In-slab heating is provided throughout the building. The exposed concrete slab is in fair condition with minor cracking. Cracks have previously been repaired. The tile floors are in good to fair condition with minor cracking.



Bollards are present on either side of each overhead door and around the septic tank at the side of the building. They are in fair condition and show light to moderate rusting. The steel bike rack at the front of the building is in acceptable condition with moderate rusting around the base (Refer to Photo 7.2.1). Various exterior concrete items including sidewalks, equipment pads, and light pole bases were in good to fair condition.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

36 -

244 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The exterior metal roofing, soffits and facia appear to be in good condition with no obvious concerns. (Refer to Photo 7.2.2).



The exterior metal siding and masonry base appear to be in good condition but caulking is required to seal gaps between window jambs and masonry base as water is able to penetrate into the wall assembly. It is recommended these gaps be sealed with caulking as part of general maintenance. (Refer to Photo 7.2.3).



The main entrance doors appear to be in good condition though mortar at base of sidelight has cracked and is failing. It is recommended base of sidelights be sealed with caulking as part of general maintenance. It wall also commented that the original door seals and latch were replaced after original install due to air leakage, and the replacement seals continue to require ongoing maintenance. (Refer to Photo 7.2.4 and Photo 7.2.5).



Exterior metal doors at appear to be in good condition though the exterior door from the garage is showing surface rust. It is recommended this door be painted as part of general maintenance. (Refer to Photo 7.2.6).



The interior floor wall and ceiling finishes are in generally good condition, but minor localized damage observed at men’s washroom at urinal. It is recommended this damage be repaired as part of general maintenance.



Frontenac Paramedics Logistics Superintendent noted a drainage issue had recently been addressed at North West Corner of building. Evidence of the issue can be seen though no further action is expected to be required. 7.3

HVAC



The ventilation for the ambulance bays is interlocked with a CO detector which opens a makeup air damper and enables a wall exhauster to ventilate the space on high CO levels. This functionality could not be verified however the visual condition of these systems was good. A local switch could be added to ventilate the bays manually.



The bays are heated through an infloor hydronic hot water system generated through a boiler in the utility room and controlled by a local thermostat. A hydronic unit heater is also provided to supplement heating which was in good condition however an air vent was located on a low spot of the piping system which should be relocated to a local high spot to promote better air venting (Refer to Photo 7.3.1 & Photo 7.3.2).



The occupied areas of the building are air conditioned through an indoor Lifebreath air handling unit. The DX cooling is accomplished through an exterior condenser which was generally in good condition with the exception of some surface rust on the condenser fan, missing sections of insulation on the refrigerant piping, and a dirty condenser coil. The occupied areas are heated through the infloor hydronic heating system controlled by a remote thermostat. It was noted the

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

37 -

245 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report staff lounge and occupied areas did not appear to have provisions for outdoor air which should be reviewed by a qualified party (Refer to Photo 7.3.3). 

The utility rooms houses the domestic hot water tanks, boiler system and associated appurtenances including an expansion tank, circulation pumps, an air separator, venting, and control system. All heating components were in good condition. The boiler system was missing a chemical treatment system which can treat the boiler water with corrosion inhibitors and neutralize p.. The additional of a chemical treatment system is strongly encouraged to prevent premature failure of equipment.



The washrooms and storage rooms are provided with local washroom style exhaust fans which were operating well. It was noted the storage room contains oxygen cylinder storage which may require additional ventilation to conform to the Ontario Fire Code. It is recommended the County have a qualified party review the requirements for oxygen storage within the facility. 7.4

Plumbing



Sections of exterior propane piping are rusted and should be repainted. The generator propane relief pipe is currently installed too close to an operable window and should be extended to maintain a 1m clearance. The relief for the building propane regulator is currently not protected from rainwater ingress and should be fitted with a gooseneck (Refer to Photo 7.4.1).



Hose reels in the ambulance bays are supplied with hot and cold water for wash downs and are in good condition.



Eye washes are provided in the ambulance bays and storage room with functioning mixing valves and are in good condition. Testing records were not found which should be kept to promote regular testing in accordance with Ministry of Labour regulations.



It was noted a previous stormwater reclaim system had been decommissioned due to odour and maintenance issues. 7.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems appear to generally be in good condition. The majority of electrical equipment was installed during building construction in 2011.



The main panelboard/disconnect is a Siemens 200A, 120/240V panelboard and appears to be in good condition (refer to Photo 7.5.1). A Generac QuietSource series standby generator provides emergency backup power, in the event of utility power loss, via an automatic transfer switch (refer to Photo 7.5.2).



The PV generation system is installed the ambulance base and appears to be in fair condition (refer to Photo 7.5.3). The electrical panel mounted at the solar array is exhibiting signs of rust (refer to Photo 7.5.4). The system supplies power to the electrical grid, but is not utilized as a supplement power source for the building.



Interior lighting systems is a mixture of fluorescent and LED troffers, and pot light fixtures. Exterior lighting systems are LED down light fixtures and area lighting. Generally light fixtures appear to be in fair condition, some interior fixtures require repair or replacement. The utility room and hallway light fixtures require bulb replacement or fixture repair, ambulance bay and hallway

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

38 -

246 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report lighting are yellowing and require cleaning or replacement. The IT room pot light requires repair and the men’s washroom light switch is not operational. 

Electric vehicle charger cable reel next to the parking area has been damaged but appears to remain operational (refer to Photo 7.5.5).



Exit signs appear to be in good condition. As of January 1, 2014, all new buildings and major renovations are required to install the new “Running Man” Exit signage. The running man exit signs are not currently required for this building. If a major renovation, as defined by the Ontario Building Code (OBC) occurs, or a new building is constructed, then the “Running Man” signs will be required. 7.6



Parking Lots / Lane Ways

The asphalt parking lot and driveway are in fair condition with minor to moderate cracking. The concrete sidewalk/walkway at the front of the building is in good to fair condition with minor cracking around the base of one of the canopy columns.

Table 11: Summary of Sydenham Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Bike Rack - Acceptable - moderate rust.

$1,000

Exterior Overhead Door – Exterior - Acceptable Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 10 year window.

$10,000

Exterior Doors – Exterior - Recommend painting exterior door from garage as part of general maintenance.

Exterior Windows – Exterior - Caulking required to seal gaps between window jambs and stone base. Recommend repairs as part of regular maintenance program.

Interior Floors – Interior - Localized repairs recommended in men’s bathroom at water closet.

HVAC Condenser – Exterior - Some motor rust.

$2,000 Plumbing

Not Applicable

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

39 -

247 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Electrical Distribution System – Interior Lighting - Generally appear to be in fair condition. Some fixtures require repair or replacement. Clean light fixtures as necessary.

$1,500

Distribution System – Cable Reel - Cable reel is damaged and requires replacement.

$1,648

Fire Alarm System – Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm - Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration.

$500

Parking Lot / Lane Ways Not Applicable TOTAL

$1,648

$15,000

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

40 -

248 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 8.0

ROBERTSVILLE AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 8.1

Overview

The property at 15405 Road 509 in Robertsville, Ontario includes a single-storey Ambulance Station with one garage-bay for an ambulance vehicle and common interior spaces for the ambulance staff. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 4,000ft² and was constructed in about 2013. Table 12 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Robertsville Ambulance Base since its original construction in 2013. Table 12: Summary of Historical Robertsville Ambulance Base Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

2013

Original building construction (No additional upgrades reported)

Structural / Architectural



The structure is wood-framed structure on poured concrete foundation walls.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with vinyl siding with a stone base on the front and sides. Windows are typically punched, aluminum-clad wood framed windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by sloped roofing assemblies.



The building consists of a single storey living/office space and a one-vehicle ambulance garage. The wall structure is not exposed and could not be observed. The exterior walls and the inside of the garage are finished with corrugated sheet metal and masonry veneer. The roof structure is not exposed and could not be observed. The exterior of the roof is cladded with corrugated sheet metal. The floors in the garage, supply room and utility room are exposed concrete slab-on-grade. The floors in the remainder of the building are slab-on-grade finished with tile. In-slab heating is provided throughout the building. The exposed concrete slab is in good condition with minor cracking.



Bollards present on either side of the overhead door are in good condition with light rusting.



The metal roofing appears to be in good condition with no major issues. Some localized staining from water runoff was noted at garage facia overhanging lower roof apparently due to mis-installed drip edges. It is anticipated periodic cleaning as part of regular maintenance or repair of drip edges at these locations would be desired for aesthetic reasons. (Refer to Photo 8.2.1 and Photo 8.2.2).

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

41 -

249 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The caulking at windows, exterior overhead doors and front entrance columns are showing signs of deterioration. It is recommended caulking be replaced at these locations as part of general maintenance plan. (Refer to Photo 8.2.3 and Photo 8.2.4).



The exterior metal door from the garage is reported to potentially not be insulated as the frame and door experience freezing of interior condensate to the point that the door is inoperable during the winter months. It is recommended this door be replaced with an insulated door.



Interior Walls appear in good condition but there is localized water damage above exterior metal door to patio. It is recommended drywall be repaired and, during repair, that the source of damage be investigated. Source of damage not evident at time of inspection. (Refer to Photo 8.2.5). 8.3

HVAC



The ventilation for the ambulance bays is interlocked with a CO detector which opens a makeup air damper and enables an exterior wall mounted upblast fan to ventilate the space on high CO levels. This functionality could not be verified however the visual condition of these systems was good. A local switch could be added to ventilate the bays manually. Occupants indicated the ambulance bay is susceptible to high humidity conditions during washdowns which has frozen openings shut in winter conditions. A ceiling fan is also located in the ambulance bay to promote mixing and reduce stratification.



The ambulance bay is heated through an infloor hydronic hot water system generated through a boiler in the utility room and controlled by a local thermostat. The occupied areas of the building are also heated through the same in floor system.



The utility room houses the indirect domestic hot water heater, in floor manifolds, controls, a boiler, circulation pumps, chemical treatment system, well water tank and treatment system, and a low loss header. All equipment was in good condition (Refer to Photo 8.3.1 & Photo 8.3.2).



A split system Mitsubishi air conditioner is located in the crew area to provide local cooling. The rejected heat from this system is piped to an outdoor condenser which was in good condition however the condenser fins were significantly clogged with debris which will reduce the service life of the equipment (Refer to Photo 8.3.3).



A Venmar Heat Recovery Ventilator (HRV) is located within the ceiling space of the crew area which recovers heat from exhaust systems to heat outdoor air and deliver it to the space. This unit is controlled from a local controller in the kitchen and is in good condition (Refer to Photo 8.4.1).



It was noted the oxygen room contains oxygen cylinder storage which may require additional ventilation to conform to the Ontario Fire Code. It is recommended the County have a qualified party review the requirements for oxygen storage within the facility. 8.4

Plumbing



A trench drain and local sump is provided in the ambulance bay which has raised operational concerns due to odours generated from the local sump. Based on the complaints, this should be investigated and corrected. The condition of the trench drain cover is good.



Sections of exterior propane piping are rusted and should be repainted. It was noted the flexible propane line from the outdoor tank is susceptible to damage and should be protected.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

42 -

250 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

A hose reel in the ambulance bay is supplied with cold water for wash downs and is in good condition.



Eye washes are provided in the ambulance bay with functioning mixing valves and are in good condition. Testing records were not found which should be kept to promote regular testing in accordance with Ministry of Labour regulations.



A new Reverse Osmosis (RO) system was installed for the kitchen sink and is in good condition. 8.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems appear to generally be in good condition. Electrical equipment was installed during construction of the ambulance base in 2013.



The main panelboard/disconnect is an Eaton 100A, 120/240V panelboard and appears to be in good condition (refer to Photo 8.5.1). A Honeywell standby generator provides emergency power, in the event of utility power loss, via an automatic transfer switch (refer to Photo 8.5.2).



The majority of light fixtures are LED and are good condition.



Parking Lots / Lane Ways

Exterior concrete pads are located at the entrance and side patio of the building, as well as under a utility box and a petroleum gas tank. All concrete pads are in good condition with no obvious issues. Asphalt parking areas also appear in good condition.

Table 13: Summary of Robertsville Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Exterior Walls – Exterior - Caulking at exterior doors, front entrance columns, window bases and overhead doors showing signs of wear. Recommend replacement as part of general maintenance plan. Exterior Overhead Door – Exterior/Garage Acceptable - Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 10 year window.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$2,200

September 2019

43 -

251 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate Exterior Doors – Exterior - Door Frame Uninsulated at door from Garage. Recommend replacing door with insulated door.

Roof Assembly – Exterior - Staining at facia due to drip edge not functioning. The county may want to consider cleaning of facia as part of regular maintenance for aesthetic appearance.

Interior Walls – Interior - Recommended drywall repair above exterior metal door to out door patio. Drywall showing signs of moisture damage. Cause unknown.

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

$2,200

HVAC Not Applicable Plumbing Not Applicable Electrical Not Applicable Parking Lot / Lane Ways Not Applicable TOTAL

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

44 -

252 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 9.0

WOLFE ISLAND AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 9.1

Overview

The property at 108 Road 95 in Wolfe Island, Ontario includes a single-storey Ambulance Station with four garage-bays for ambulance vehicles (which will not be covered in this assessment) and a second smaller building used as common interior spaces for the ambulance staff. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 1,540ft² and was constructed in about 2011. Table 14 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Wolfe Island Ambulance Base since its original construction in 2011. Table 14: Summary of Historical Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

2011

Original building construction (No additional upgrades reported)

Structural / Architectural



The structure is wood-framed structure on poured concrete foundation walls.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with metal panel siding. Windows are typically punched, vinyl-framed windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by sloped roofing assemblies.



The building consists of a single storey living space only. The wall structure is not exposed and could not be observed. The exterior walls are finished with corrugated sheet metal. The roof structure is not exposed and could not be observed, however space between the drop ceiling and a layer of drywall revealed timber frame joists in generally good condition. The exterior of the roof is cladded with corrugated sheet metal. The floor in the furnace room is exposed concrete slabon-grade and is in fair condition. The floors in the remainder of the building are slab-on-grade finished with tile and no obvious issues were observed.



The exterior metal roofing, soffits and facia appear to be in good condition with no obvious concerns. Some fading of roof colour apparent. (Refer to Photo 9.2.1).



The exterior metal panel siding appears to be in good condition but detailing at door and window penetrations require review and repairs as currently siding does not provide full coverage around these openings. Gaps between the siding and existing window trim detail allow for water to penetrate behind metal panel siding. Appropriate counter flashing at door and window jambs is

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

45 -

253 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report required and flashing details at window and doors headers need to be corrected to allow for positive drainage of rain water. (Refer to Photo 9.2.2 and 9.2.3). 

The Building interior finishes appear to be in good condition with some wear showing on walls from general use. It is anticipated painting of interior walls will be desired as part of regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 9.2.4).



The vinyl tile throughout the building appears to be in good condition but some localized delamination was noted at the north bedroom along the north wall potentially due to moisture at slab. It is anticipated localized repair of the tile will be desired as part of regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 9.2.5). 9.3

HVAC



The building is heated and cooled through an indoor furnace system equipped with a propane burner and refrigerant based cooling system. The furnace appeared to have an interior water leak which could be due to a loose condensate connection or leaking venting connection. A maintenance record for correcting this work was not found. It is encouraged to have the furnace serviced to confirm the leak has been resolved. The furnace is directly vented to the outdoors and also has a dedicated combustion air supply. Both exterior pipe terminations should be equipped with bird screens to deter birds from nesting. The furnace appears to be operating adequately and was in good condition. The exterior propane tanks and piping are also in good condition. The exterior condenser for the air conditioning system has slight surface rust on the condenser motor. It was also noted the exterior refrigerant piping insulation is deteriorating from UV exposure (Refer to Photo 9.3.1 & Photo 9.3.2.



Local washroom style exhaust fans are located in the washroom and kitchen areas and were both functional and in good condition.



A dryer located in one of the bedrooms vents to the outdoors. There was an appreciable amount of lint on the discharge of the dryer vent which should be cleaned to mitigate a fire hazard.



It was noted the living area did not appear to have provisions for outdoor air which should be reviewed by a qualified party. 9.4

Plumbing



A small 3000W GSW electric hot water heater is located in the furnace room to provide hot water to the washroom & bathroom fixtures.



A new Reverse Osmosis (RO) system was installed for the kitchen sink and is in good condition. 9.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems appear to generally be in good condition. Electrical equipment was installed during building construction in 2011.



The main panelboard/disconnect is a Siemens 100A, 120/240V panelboard and appears to be in good condition. The main electrical equipment should have one (1) meter of clearance in front, it is recommended that the shelf housing communication equipment be relocated to allow for clearance around electrical panel (refer to Photo 9.5.1). A Generac Guardian series 10kW standby

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

46 -

254 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report generator provides emergency power, in the event of utility power loss, via an automatic transfer switch (refer to Photo 9.5.2) 

Exit signs appear to be aged and are showing signs of wear, replace in the near future. As of January 1, 2014, all new buildings and major renovations are required to install the new “Running Man” Exit signage. The running man exit signs are not currently required for this building. If a major renovation, as defined by the Ontario Building Code (OBC) occurs, or a new building is constructed, then the “Running Man” signs will be required. 9.6



Parking Lots / Lane Ways

The asphalt parking lot and lane way are in good condition with no observable deterioration. The concrete sidewalk is in acceptable condition with moderate cracking, some settlement and a rough finish around the edge of the building (Refer to Photo 9.6.1). The asphalt helicopter landing pad beside the building is in poor condition due to major cracking, overgrown grass, a lack of marking paint, and an unlevel surface (Refer to Photo 9.6.2). If this area is expected to be in use it is recommended that remedial work be undertaken as soon as possible.

Table 15: Summary of Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Exterior Walls – Exterior - Door and window penetrations require counter flashing at jambs where siding meets windows and doors (all). Currently siding does not provide full coverage around these openings. Flashing details at window and doors headers to be corrected to allow for positive drainage of rain water.

$2,250

Interior Walls – Interior - Recommend budgeting for interior painting as part of general maintenance. Interior Floors – Interior - Localized delamination of tile at north bedroom along north wall potentially due to moisture at slab. Localized repairs recommended.

HVAC Condenser – Exterior - Insulation showing signs of weather damage, will deteriorate. Coils clean, some signs of motor rust.

Plumbing Not Applicable Electrical Interior Lighting – Various – Faulty Bathroom and Bedroom Light Switches to be replaced. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$500

September 2019

47 -

255 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

Emergency Lighting System - Exit Signs - An exit sign is in poor condition and could use replacement. Other exit signs appear to be in fair condition. Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

5 to 10 Years

$600

Parking Lot / Lane Ways Concrete Sidewalk – Along Front and Side of Building - Acceptable - moderate cracking, some settlement, rough finish along building edge. Should continue to be monitored.

$5,000

HeliPad – East of Building - Poor - major cracking, not level, overgrown with grass, paint barely visible. (HeliPad is not actively in use. Rehabilitation should be expected if it were to be put back in use.) TOTAL

see comment

$2,750

$5,600

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

48 -

256 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 10.0 PARHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 10.1

Overview

The property at 10579 Road 38 Parham in Ontario includes a single-storey Ambulance Station with three garage-bays for ambulance vehicles and common interior spaces for the ambulance staff. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 2,800ft² with the original building being constructed in about 1981. Table 16 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Parham Ambulance Base since its original construction in 1981. Table 16: Summary of Historical Parham Ambulance Base Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

1981

Original building construction

1994

Addition of living room to North end of structure

2003

2-bay garage addition

Structural / Architectural



The structure is wood-framed. The foundation walls are concrete block.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with vinyl siding. Windows are typically punched, vinyl with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by a sloped roofing assemblies.



The building consists of a one-storey crew space, a basement area and a three-vehicle ambulance garage. The wall and roof structures are not exposed and could not be observed. The exterior walls are finished with siding, the garage is finished with corrugated sheet metal, and the inside walls are finished with drywall. The overall building structure is generally in acceptable condition.



The foundation/basement walls are concrete blocks covered with parging, some of which is cracking. Leaks are present at various locations in the foundation walls, however a new waterproofing membrane and a new sump pit were being installed at the time of the site visit. Cracking and spalling of the blocks is present in some areas. It is assumed the current construction on site will rectify the leakage issue through the foundation walls.



Excavation for the new waterproofing membrane exposed exterior wooden floor joints for the entrance hall in acceptable to poor condition. The basement level allowed for access to view the ground floor structure from below. A floor joist near the basement stairs is failing near the railing post and is in poor condition (Refer to Photo 10.2.1). Repairs to this joist are recommended. The rest of the floor joists are generally in fair condition with minor wear.



The concrete slab-on-grade in the garage is in fair condition with moderate cracking and delamination that has previously been repaired. The joint between the exterior apron slab and the

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

49 -

257 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report garage slab has severe cracking despite being previously repaired (Refer to Photo 10.2.2). The basement slab-on-grade is in acceptable condition with moderate wear. 

The building roof is finished with asphalt shingles and appears to be in good condition showing no obvious issues. It is understood shingles were installed in approximately 2016. (Refer to Photo 10.2.3).



The three exterior overhead doors appear in acceptable condition with moderate rusting at track bases, and minor wear. The Superintendent of Logistics Frontenac Paramedics noted that frequent ongoing maintenance is required due to frequency of use. It is recommended replacement be budgeted for within 10 year window due to age and frequency of use. (Refer to Photo 10.2.4 and 10.2.5).



The exterior windows appear to be in fair condition. It is anticipated windows will be replaced within 10 years.



Ceramic tile is installed throughout the interior living spaces and appears to be in good condition overall. The tile has been installed at various times over the life of the building. It was noted that the grout is failing in the hallway area installation. It is recommended the tile in the hallway be replaced. (Refer to Photo 10.2.6)



The fixtures in bathroom are assumed to be original and the associated caulking is failing. Recommend re-caulking as part of general maintenance.



Kitchen cabinetry is assumed to be original and is in good operational condition though dated in style. The County may want to consider replacement for aesthetic reasons.



The main exterior door and rear exterior door appear to both be in fair condition but hardware is showing wear. It is recommended hardware be replaced as part of general maintenance. The County may consider replacement of both doors for improved performance.



The perforated aluminum soffits, aluminum Fascia appear to be in good condition with no obvious issues. Soffit panels note to be misaligned at south west corner of building resulting in a gap providing potential access of wildlife. Recommend repairing soffit as part of regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 10.2.7) 10.3

HVAC



The ventilation for the ambulance bays is controlled through a local timer manually which enables a wall exhauster equipped with a backdraft damper. The exhaust fan is in good condition. A makeup air source is not provided which will lower the amount exhausted when the overhead doors are closed. It is also not equipped with a CO detector which should be added for safety considerations. Three ceiling fans are located within the bays to promote mixing and reduce stratification. The ceiling fan serving the original bay is wobbling and should be tightened to prevent future equipment failure.



The heating for the ambulance bays is provided through an oil fired furnace located in the furnace room which is generally in good condition. The oil tank serving the furnace is located in the same room and appears to have been recently replaced and in good condition however it is missing a drain pan to contain spills. The room did not appear to be fire rated and there are concerns with other fuel oil code compliance. A combustion air duct is provided for the furnace however it is

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

50 -

258 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report installed as a flexible duct which is not code compliant. It is recommended a qualified party review the fuel oil system for code conformance. The furnace is connected to an overhead duct system which is in good condition with the exception of the return grille which was damaged and should be repaired. Two duct branches serving the old bay are not provided with grilles which should be added to prevent birds from nesting. A recirculation unit is also installed in the bays however it was indicated as decommissioned (Refer to Photo 10.3.1 & Photo 10.3.2). 



The remainder of the station is ventilated with a basement oil fired furnace and air conditioning system. At the time of the assessment, the air conditioning was disconnected to facilitate exterior foundation repairs. The condenser was noted to be significantly plugged and should be cleaned. A combustion air duct is provided for the basement appliances however it was installed as flexible ducting which is not code compliant. Similar to the garage oil fired furnace, a code review should be completed to determine code compliancy.



A Heat Recovery Ventilator installed in the basement provides tempered outdoor air ducted to the furnace system. The filter for this unit was significantly plugged and should be replaced. The condition of the HRV is good (Refer to Photo 10.3.3). 10.4

Plumbing



The water supply for the building is provided through a well pump and filtration system which was brand new.



A new Reverse Osmosis (RO) system was installed for the kitchen sink and is in good condition.



The garage is equipped with a cold water hose reel and drained through a trench drain which are in good condition. The occupants have indicated the drain frequently backs up during wash downs. It is recommended to rod/flush these lines to determine if they are restricted or if the issue is a result of undersized or improperly vented drainage.



Hot water is generated through an oil fired water heater in the basement which appeared to be in good condition. The relief valve was noted to be leaking and should be replaced. A basement oil tank supplies oil to the water heater and furnace and appeared to be new and in good condition (Refer to Photo 10.4.1).



It was noted there are no eye washes provided in the bays which should be added similar to the other ambulance stations.



A local pedestal style sump pump is installed in the basement and was in good condition. The discharge flexible hose should be replaced with rigid piping as it appeared to be leaking significantly when the pump was on.



A new Reverse Osmosis (RO) system was installed for the kitchen sink and is in good condition.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

51 -

259 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 10.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems appear to generally be in fair condition. Multiple renovations with electrical work have been completed since the buildings construction in 1981.



The main panelboard/disconnect is an Eaton 200A, 120/240V main panelboard located in the basement with a Square D 100A, 120/240V sub panel in the garage (refer to Photos 10.5.1 and 10.5.2). The main panelboard is showing signs of rust and wear, and should be considered for replacement in the future. There is a Generac 17kW Guardian series standby generator located outside of the building, the standby generator was not connected due to work being done on the buildings foundation (refer to Photo 10.5.3). It is recommended that the generator be relocated during construction to protect damage and dust from construction activities.



We recommend the integrity of old braided wiring be assessed by a certified electrician. The insulation integrity of aged braided wiring may be compromised due to its age (refer to Photo 10.5.4). Older braided wiring originally did not consist of a ground wire which is required by the current Ontario Electrical Code. A detailed inspection by an electrician would confirm the presence of a ground wire. In general it is recommended that all aged braided wire be replaced.



Some interior light fixtures are aging and should be considered for replacement. The light fixture above the kitchen sink is showing signs of rusting and should be considered for replacement. Switch cover in basement is cracked and should be replaced.



LED light on exterior of garage is always on. Investigation and implementation of lighting control should be considered.



Old generator connection located in the garage should be considered for removal.



Air conditioner was not connected at the time of observation due to renovation (refer to Photo 10.5.5). The A/C disconnect is getting old and should be considered for replacement.



Phone connection in the Crew Room is not operational.



Parking Lots / Lane Ways

The asphalt parking lot and driveway are in fair condition with minor to moderate cracking.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

52 -

260 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Table 17: Summary of Parham Ambulance Base Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Foundation - Poor - leaking in multiple locations, being repaired at time of site visit.

Slab-on-grade – Vehicle Bays - Generally fair moderate cracking and delamination that has previously been repaired, localized poor condition at joint between SOG and apron slab.

$2,000

Interior Floors - Main Floor - Generally fair condition with minor wear. Joist at post by stairs is failing - Poor condition.

$2,000

Interior Floors - Basement - Acceptable moderate wear. Exterior Doors – Exterior - Fair - No Obvious Issues with doors themselves - Recommend replacement of hardware and hinges as they are showing wear - The County may consider replacement of doors for performance.

$2,500

Exterior Overhead Doors - Acceptable moderate rusting at track bases. Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 10 year window.

$8,000

Exterior Windows – Exterior - Fair Condition Recommend budgeting for replacement within 10 years based on age.

$2,000

Exterior Windows – Exterior/1994 Addition - Fair Condition - Recommend budgeting for replacement within 5 years based on age.

$1,000

Interior Floors – Main Floor - Grout failing at tile throughout hallway. Recommend repairing grout or replacing tile through hallway.

$1,000

HVAC Garage Furnace Ductwork - Return grille to furnace should be replaced.

$200

Plumbing Not Applicable

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

53 -

261 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Electrical Incoming Services – Main Panelboard Disconnect Switch - Showing some signs of wear. Replace around 5 years based on condition rating.

$5,000

Distribution System – Interior Lighting - Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Replace bulbs as required. Clean insects from fixtures as necessary. Cracked switch cover in basement should be replaced. Light above sink requires replacement.

$1,500

Distribution System – Conduit and Lighting - All old braided wiring should be considered for replacement within 5 years based on condition rating.

$5,000

Distribution System – Conduit and Lighting - Old generator hook-up in the garage should be removed.

$500

Distribution System – A/C Disconnect - Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Parking Lot / Lane Ways Not Applicable TOTAL

$3,500

$10,000

$17,700

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

54 -

262 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 11.0 FAIRMOUNT HOME PARAMEDIC OFFICES CONDITION ASSESSMENT 11.1

Overview

The Paramedic Offices are located in the basement of the “Fairmount Home” located at 2069 Battersea Road in Glenburnie, Ontario. According to the County of Frontenac, this area of the building has a gross floor area of about 6,200ft². Table 18 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Fairmount Home since its original construction in 2006. Table 18: Summary of Historical Fairmount Home Paramedic Offices Building Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

1968

Original building construction

1972

Original auditorium construction

2004

Renovation and expansion to the original building

2014

Auditorium rebuilt

11.3 

Structural / Architectural The carpet in the Paramedic Office at the basement level appears in poor condition showing wear and staining due to age. It is recommended this carpet be replaced within 5 years base on condition and age. HVAC RTU-6 serves the paramedic office area and is heated through a gas fired heating section and cooled through an integral DX refrigeration system. The unit has an economizer section to utilize free cooling during shoulder seasons. The unit is in good condition and has been reported to be operating well. The refrigerant used is R-22 which shares the same concerns as the other rooftop units. The unit was installed in 2007 and the typical life expectancy of these units can vary from 15 to 25 years. Due to the good condition of the units, replacement should be expected within 10 years however additional costs will be incurred if units require recharging with R-22 refrigerant before replacement. There are also the environmental implications for an R-22 leak which should be considered.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

55 -

263 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Table 19: Summary of Fairmount Home Paramedic Offices Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Building Interior – Interior Floors - Poor condition, Recommend replacement due to age

$34,307

HVAC Not Applicable TOTAL

$34,307

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

56 -

264 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 12.0 HOWE ISLAND FERRY CONDITION ASSESSMENT 12.1

Overview

The property at 2 Howe Island Ferry Road in Kingston, Ontario includes a single-storey space for the ferry staff and the public. According to the County of Frontenac, the building has a gross floor area of about 300ft² and was constructed in 2006. Table 20 provides a brief summary of historical upgrades undertaken at the Howe Island Ferry Building since its original construction in 2006. Table 20: Summary of Historical Howe Island Ferry Building Upgrades

Year

Description of Upgrade

2006

Original building construction (No additional upgrades reported)

Structural / Architectural



The structure is wood-framed. The building is built on a poured concrete slab.



The exterior walls are primarily clad with metal panel siding. Windows are punched, vinyl frame windows with double-glazed vision glass. The building is protected by a low sloped pitch roofing assembly (metal panel).



No evidence of building settlement or other poor foundation performance was observed or reported by regular building occupants. The foundation slab appears to be in fair condition with minor wear and select areas of moderate wear.



The building structure consists of wood framing finished with corrugated sheet metal for the walls and roof. The framing was not exposed and could not be observed, however no obvious issues were apparent. The interior floor is damaged at the main door, likely due to moisture, and has been temporarily patched.



Concrete stairs lead up to both doors at the front of the building. These stairs are in fair condition with minor wear. Bollards located around the electrical panel are in fair condition with minor wear and rust. The guiderail in front of the building is in acceptable condition with minor damage at the north end (Refer to Photo 12.2.1).



The asphalt parking space in front of the building is in fair condition with minor cracking.



Caulking at vertical joint of base flashing on west side of building noted to be failing. It is recommend this joint be repaired and joints be monitored/repaired as part of regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 12.2.2).

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

57 -

265 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

The interior ceiling finish is suspended acoustical tile and is generally in fair condition. The ceiling grid is showing minor rust around perimeter of the main office space and moderate rusting within the bathroom. It is expected the repair/replacement of the ceiling tile system will be desired for aesthetic reasons within 5-10 years.



The seals of the insulated glass units of the vinyl windows throughout the building show signs of wear. It is recommending windows be replaced within 5 years for performance. (Refer to Photo 12.2.3).



Interior vinyl plank flooring throughout the building is generally in good condition. Localized damage due to moisture at main door temporarily patched/covered with plywood panel at time of visit. It is recommended source of damage be investigated, patched and repaired. (Refer to Photo 12.2.4).



It was noted that office cabinets are showing signs of wear. The County may want to consider replacement for aesthetic reasons.



Interior metal bathroom door and frame in generally good condition though showing advanced surface wear. The County may want to consider repainting door and frame for aesthetic reasons as part regular maintenance. (Refer to Photo 12.2.5).



Grab bars in washroom are noted to have minor rusting. The County may want to consider replacement for aesthetic reasons. 12.3



HVAC

The ferry terminal is heated and cooled through an exterior mounted unit ventilator equipped with a refrigeration circuit and electrical heating coil. It was noted the refrigeration circuit utilizes R-22 refrigerant which will be effectively phased out in Canada under the Montreal protocol by 2020. This will make future repairs and recharging prohibitively costly and eventually unachievable. Otherwise, the condition of the ventilator was good (Refer to Photo 12.3.1). 12.4

Plumbing



A small under cabinet electric domestic hot water tank is located under the sink which provides hot water to the washroom and office sink and is in good condition (Refer to Photo 12.4.1).



The washroom is provided with an electric baseboard heater and ceiling washroom fan however the fan is not vented to the exterior of the building. Several equipment and finishes in the washroom are rusting prematurely which is likely due to the high humidity and lack of ventilation. It is recommended to vent the exhaust fan and replace the rusted washroom plumbing escutcheons (Refer to Photo 12.4.2 & Photo 12.4.3). 12.5

Electrical



Overall, the electrical systems appear to generally be in good condition.



The main panelboard/disconnect is a Siemens 100A, 120/240V panelboard and appears to be in good condition (refer to Photo 12.5.1). The main panelboard appears to be fed from MTO owned stainless steel electrical enclosure located near the ferry building.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

58 -

266 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 

Meter base cabinet is starting to exhibit signs of rust. The service conduit and weather head are severely rusted, it is recommended that the conduit and weather head are replaced (refer to Photo 12.5.2).



It is not recommended to chain equipment to electrical cables for security (refer to Photo 12.5.3). Cable is not intended or designed for this purpose, the cable could potentially be damaged and pose a safety hazard.



Interior and exterior lighting is showing signs of wear but is operational (refer to Photo 12.5.4). Replace fixture bulbs and lens as necessary. It is recommend that light fixtures are considered for replacement.



It is recommended that the non-illuminated exit signage be replaced with new illuminated “Running Man” exit signage. . As of January 1, 2014, all new buildings and major renovations are required to install the new “Running Man” Exit signage. The running man exit signs are not currently required for this building. If a major renovation, as defined by the Ontario Building Code (OBC) occurs, or a new building is constructed, then the “Running Man” signs will be required.



The sump pump alarm panel is exhibiting signs of wear and rusting. The warning light is lit and should be investigated (refer to Photo 12.5.5). Wiring located at the tank access point appears to have been damaged and splice together as a fix (refer to Photo 11.5.6). It is strongly recommended that this system is replaced to prevent failure. All cabling installed above ground should have mechanical protection to prevent damage. Table 21: Summary of Howe Island Ferry Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Structural/Architectural Exterior Walls - Caulking at vertical joint of base flashing failing. Recommend repairing.

Exterior Windows - Poor - Windows seals beginning to fail. Recommend replacement within 5 years. Interior Walls - Door casing at exterior doors showing staining and water damage. Recommend painting.

$2,500

Interior Doors – Washroom - Good functional condition though showing surface wear. Recommend painting for aesthetic reasons. Interior Floor - Generally Good Condition. Damage at main door (likely due to moisture) to be repaired, temporary patch in now. Recommend replacement of flooring.

$3,500

Interior Ceiling - Generally fair condition. Showing minor rust around perimeter. Showing J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

$1,800

September 2019

59 -

267 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

moderate rusting of support grid in bathroom. Recommend budgeting for Replacement within 5 years HVAC Sump Level Alarm – Washroom - Used for septic holding tank.

$500

Electric Radiator – Washroom - Some surface rust, should be painted.

$300

Plumbing Not Applicable Electrical Distribution Systems – Interior Lighting Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 5 years based on condition rating. Clean insects and replace bulbs/lens as required.

$750

Distribution Systems – Exterior Lighting Replacement of Wall Pack within 5 years based on condition rating.

$250

Distribution Systems – Conduit and Wiring Conduit for service connection is heavily rusted. It is recommended to replace this conduit.

$2,500

Miscellaneous – Baseboard Heating - Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500

Miscellaneous – Sump Pump Alarm - Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Exposed wire at the tank should be replaced and mechanically protected. Replace within 5 years based on condition rating.

$2,500

Parking Lot / Lane Ways Guiderail – North of Building - Acceptable - minor damage on North end TOTAL

$2,000 $3,500

$10,300

$3,300

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Note: A $ sign with no value is used to indicate associated time frame for recommendations with a low dollar value and/or recommendations to be carried out as part of regular maintenance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

60 -

268 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 13.0 K & P TRAIL BRIDGES CONDITION ASSESSMENT 13.1

Overview

The detailed Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) report for the five (5) K&P trail bridges has been submitted separately. The following table provides an overview summary of costs required for recommended maintenance and rehabilitation work for the bridges. Table 22: Summary of K&P Trail Bridges Short to Medium Term Recommendations and Costs

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

Millhaven Creek Bridge

$1,000

$1,500

Hardwood Creek Bridge

$800

$27,500

5 to 10 Years $15,000

White Creek Bridge Elbow Creek Bridge

$1,500

Fish Creek Bridge

$5,000 $16,000

TOTAL

$3,300

$50,000

$15,000

(1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

Refer to the complete OSIM Report titled “County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges – 2019 OSIM Report” for all details.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

61 -

269 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report 14.0 COST SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CAPITAL UPGRADES A summary of estimated costs and associated recommendations made within this Memorandum are provided in Table 23, organized by class and timeframe. The following is noted: 

No estimated costs are included for any potential upgrades or improvements regarding potential non-compliance with current Ontario Building Code requirements (including life-safety, egress, fire-ratings, seismic performance of buildings and process structures and equipment).



The estimated costs for the various items are order-of-magnitude only (Class ‘D’ Estimate) and are based on the experience and current (2019) unit prices in the construction industry.



Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost & Associated Timeframe(1)

Discipline/Activity

Immediate

0 to 5 Years

5 to 10 Years

Fairmount Home

$18,950

$1,208,075

$2,363,100

Administration Building (Old House)

$5,000

$110,200

$149,750

Palace Road Ambulance Base

$2,000

$20,000

$74,000

$1,648

$15,000

Sydenham Ambulance Base Robertsville Ambulance Base

$2,200

Wolfe Island Ambulance Base

$2,750

Parham Ambulance Base

$3,500

Fairmount Home – Paramedic Offices

$5,600 $10,000

$17,700

$34,307

Howe Island Ferry

$3,500

$10,300

$3,300

K & P Trail Bridges

$3,300

$50,000

$15,000

$39,000

$1,444,530

$2,645,650

TOTAL (1) Class D Level Estimate Opinion of Probable Costs

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

62 -

270 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The County of Frontenac, for the stated purpose, for the named facilities. Its discussions and conclusions are summary in nature and cannot be properly used, interpreted or extended to other purposes without a detailed understanding and discussions with the client as to its mandated purpose, scope and limitations. This report was prepared for the sole benefit and use of The County of Frontenac and may not be used or relied on by any other party without the express written consent of J.L. Richards & Associates Limited. This report is copyright protected and may not be reproduced or used, other than by The County of Frontenac for the stated purpose, without the express written consent of J.L. Richards & Associates Limited.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

63 -

271 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac ‐ Building Condition Assessment Report

www.jlrichards.ca

Ottawa

Kingston

Sudbury

Timmins

864 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa ON Canada K1Z 5M2 Tel: 613 728-3571

203-863 Princess Street Kingston ON Canada K7L 5N4 Tel: 613 544-1424

314 Countryside Drive Sudbury ON Canada P3E 6G2 Tel: 705 522-8174

ottawa@jlrichards.ca

kingston@jlrichards.ca

sudbury@jlrichards.ca

201-150 Algonquin Blvd. East Timmins ON Canada P4N 1A7 Tel: 705 360-1899 timmins@jlrichards.ca

North Bay

Hawkesbury

Guelph

200-175 Progress Road North Bay ON Canada P1A 0B8 Tel: 705 495-7597

326 Bertha Street Hawkesbury ON Canada K6A 2A8 Tel: 613 632-0287

107-450 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph ON Canada N1H 7Y6 Tel: 519 763-0713

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited northbay@jlrichards.ca hawkesbury@jlrichards.ca JLR No.: 28833

64 -

guelph@jlrichards.ca

September 2019

JLR Logo is a Registered Trademark ® 2009, all rights are reserved

272 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Fairmount Home 1.1

$3,590,125.00 $2,435,675.00

Architectural & Structural 1.1.1 Building Structure

$10,000.00

Foundation

Perimeter

N/A

1.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

Mechanical Room

N/A

Concrete Slab

Various

N/A

Steel deck, OWSJ’s, beams, and columns

Various

N/A

Concrete and CMU Walls

Generally good condition

N/A

Steel

2003

Good condition, minor rusting

N/A

Concrete walls, 3 sides, steel railing, slab on grade

2003

Wall: Good/fair - minor wear Railing: Fair - minor rusting

Building Structure

1.1.1.4

Garbage Loading Area, Generator Retaining Wall Structure Generator, Behind (west) of Building

1968

Generally good (only some was observable), localized area @ auditorium was rusting Fair/poor near garbage loading area, localized major rust/deterioration, some repairs required

1.1.1.1

1.1.1.3

$10,000.00

Fair condition; minor wear and cracking observed Only observed in select locations. Generally good condition. Fireproofing of steel beams in mechanical room has been locally compromised.

1.1.1.6

Railings and Columns

1.1.1.7.1

Retaining Wall (1)

1.1.1.7.2

Retaining Wall (2)

North side of building

N/A

Separating sidewalk and grassed area

Good condition

1.1.1.9

Bollards

Various

N/A

Steel with concrete fill

Generally good

1.1.1.10

Pole Bases

Various

N/A

For light poles, flag poles, etc.

Generally fair/good, light/moderate wear

Good - Overall good condition with localized areas of deterioration.

Flashing at base of Greenhouse glazing only covers half of sill resulting in masonry staining and damage at sill joints. Stone Sill requires new flashing to provide complete coverage and repointing of the brick masonry.

$3,000.00

Investigate, clean, and repair balcony drainage at west balcony. Lack of appropriate flashing at scupper appears to be the cause of deteriorated masonry joints. Reflashing, masonry repairs and cleaning of debris from underneath patio stones recommended pending investigation.

$8,000.00

1.1.2 Building Envelope

1.1.2.1

$443,400.00

Exterior Walls

Exterior / 2004 Addition

N/A

Brick Masonry

2004

1.1.2.1

Exterior Walls

Exterior / 1968 Wing

N/A

Brick Masonry, Stucco/metal lath

1968

Good - No obvious issues

1.1.2.2

Exterior Walls

Exterior / Auditorium

N/A

Aggregate Coated Fibreglass Panels

2014

Good - No obvious issues

1.1.2.3

Exterior Doors

N/A

Glazed Aluminum Doors

2004

Good - No Obvious Issues

1.1.2.4

Exterior Doors

N/A

Glazed Aluminum Doors

2014

Good - No Obvious Issues

1.1.2.5

Exterior Doors

N/A

Metal Doors with Metal Frame

2004

Good - No Obvious Issues

Exterior/Main Entrance and Courtyard Main Auditorium Doors / Auditorium Rear Exit Loading Dock Doors / Exit Doors / Misc.

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Attribute Facility

Life Expectancy (years)

Asset

Description

Year of Installation

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Condition Rating

Identification

Asset Hierarchy

Location

273 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

Exterior / Residence Floors

N/A

Vinyl Windows

2004

Acceptable - No Obvious Issues. Recommend Budgeting for Replacement due to age.

1.1.2.7

Exterior / 4 Locations adjacent 1968 wing

N/A

Curtain Wall Windows

2004

Good - No Obvious Issues

1.1.2.8

Exterior / Auditorium

N/A

Vinyl Windows

2014

Good - No Obvious Issues

Acceptable - Recommend Budgeting for Replacement to improve performance and aesthetics.

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Attribute

Asset 1.1.2.6

1.1.2.9

Exterior Windows

Stairwell S2

N/A

Wood framed stairwell windows

1968

-21

1.1.3 Roof

$400,000.00

$32,400.00 $946,200.00

1.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

Exterior/1968 Wing

Roof Assembly

Exterior/2004 Addition Mansard Roof

N/A

Metal Shingles on Mansard Roof

3 1.1.3.2

N/A

Asphalt Shingles on Mansard Roof

2004

10 1

1.1.3.3

Roof Assembly

Exterior/2004 Addition/Sloped Roof

N/A

Asphalt Shingles on Sloped Roof (Entrance Wing)

1.1.3.4

Soffit & Fascia

Exterior/1969 wing/2004 addition

N/A

Prevented Aluminum Soffits (2004), Plywood Soffits (1968)

2004

3 5 3

1.1.3.5

Roof Assembly

Exterior/Flat Roof/1968 Wing/2004 Addition

N/A

1.1.3.6

Roof Assembly

Exterior/Auditorium

N/A

Two Ply Modified Bit Roofing Membrane

Paint showing wear - Recommend RePainting Acceptable - showing acceptable wear for age - Recommend budgeting for replacement based on effective life expectancy. Shingles at dormer windows showing degranulation and curling. Recommend replacement of shingles at all dormers. Fair - no obvious issues - Recommend budgeting for replacement based on effective life expectancy.

$25,000.00

$180,000.00

$7,000.00

$44,200.00

Good - No obvious issues Acceptable condition - Recommend replacement due to age Roofing is “bubbling” at West Side of Renovated Wing (gridlines 1x to 4x) Budgeting for replacement based on age recommended.

2004

2014

Good - No obvious issues

Generally good condition

Water damage at gypsum wall board base at Auditorium rear exit vestibule. Recommend investigating source of water at time of repair.

1.1.4 Building Interior

$10,000.00 $680,000.00

$1,036,075.00

1.1.4.1

Interior Walls

Interior / Various/ Throughout

N/A

Gypsum Wall Board

1968, 2004, 2014

1.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior/multiple floors

N/A

Metal Doors with Metal Frame, Wood Solid Core with Wood Frame

2004

Generally good condition

1.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Garbage/Mechanical Rooms

N/A

Concrete floor slabs

1968

Garbage room: Fair - wear Mechanical room: Good/fair - wear and minor cracking

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

274 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Asset Hierarchy

Identification

1.1.4.5

Interior Floors

Basement

N/A

Replace Vinyl Tiles in Basement

2004

Acceptable condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$18,500.00

1.1.4.6

Interior Floors

Ground Floor/Second Floor Corridors/Shared Spaces

N/A

Carpet Flooring

2004

Poor condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$275,000.00

1.1.4.7

Interior Floors

Basement Floor / Paramedic Offices

N/A

Carpet Flooring

2004

Poor condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$35,000.00

1.1.4.8

Interior Floors

Basement (Kitchen and Kitchen support rooms, Various utility rooms) Ground Floor / Second Floor (Kitchen and Service Corridor)

N/A

Replace remaining sheet vinyl flooring

2004

Condition ranges from poor to acceptable. Acceptable condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$28,000.00

1.1.4.9

Interior Floors

Ground Floor / Second Floor (Residence Rooms not covered in 1.1.4.6)

N/A

Replace remining sheet vinyl flooring

2004

Condition appears acceptable. Recommend replacement within 10 years based on age.

$410,000.00

1.1.4.10

Interior Ceilings

Mechanical Room

N/A

Hollow core Slab / Steel Deck and OWSJ

1968

No issues

Attribute

Asset

2 1.1.4.11

Interior Ceilings

Basement / Ground Floor / Second Floor

N/A

Suspended Acoustical Tile

2004

0 2

1.1.4.12 1.2

Interior Equipment Pads

Mechanical Room

N/A

Concrete

1968

Poor - Generally functional condition Recommend replacement due to age and condition. Poor - Ceiling tiles at all kitchens generally stained from cooking activities. Recommend Replacement.

$100,000.00

$152,600.00

$16,975.00

Fair - minor wear and cracking $107,000.00

HVAC 1.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

$88,000.00 Basement Maintenance Room

1.2.1.1

Radiator

1.2.1.2

Fridge AC Unit

Basement Fridge A-015B

1.2.1.3

Fridge AC Unit

Basement Fridge A-015C

1.2.1.4

Freezer AC Unit

Basement Freezer

1.2.1.5

CUH

Basement Vestibule S-019

1.2.1.6

AC Unit

Hot Water Radiators

2004

Ref Plus

Ref Plus Model OCS-015-1M4-5

2004

$12,000.00

Ref Plus

Ref Plus Model OCS-015-1M4-5

2004

$12,000.00

Ref Plus

Ref Plus Model OCS-040-1L4-5

2004

$16,000.00

Unknown

Vestibule CUH

2004

Unknown

Garbage Room AC Unit

2004

1.2.1.7

Unit Heater

Unknown

Garbage Room Unit Heater

2004

Poor visual condition

1.2.1.8

Condenser Unit

Basement Exterior

Unknown

Garbage Room 3 Ton Condenser Unit - Ref Plus Model OCS-020-1M4-5

2004

Costs included with indoor unit

1.2.1.9 1.2.1.10

Ceiling CUH

First Floor E-118

Unknown

Trane Model UHWA051A2AT

2004

Condenser Unit

E-109

Daikin

Daikin Condenser Unit

2004

Basement Garbage Room S-022 Basement Garbage Room S-023

Unknown

Fins good, could be cleaned

$14,000.00 $4,000.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Condition Rating

2004

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Suite Vinyl Flooring at Slab-on-grade - 2004 addition

Current Age (years)

N/A

Life Expectancy (years)

Ground Suite Floors

Attribute Class

Description

Year of Installation

Interior Floors

Asset

Manufacturer

1.1.4.4

It was noted sheet vinyl flooring in these rooms have started to shrink and pull away at the seams, and the appropriate supports have not been installed at the floor bases. It is noted that replacement of the floors in these suites is being carried out on a room by room basis with approximately 20 rooms remaining.

Class

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Facility

Location

275 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

W-106 & W-206

Mitsubishi

Mitsubishi AC Unit

2004

$4,000.00

Condenser

Exterior N-142A

Mitsubishi

2 Stacked Condenser Units

2004

$6,000.00

1.2.1.13

Radiant Panel

Corridor E-200

Unknown

Radiant Panel

2004

1.2.1.15

Steam Boilers

Basement

Unknown

Steam Boilers (x2)

2004

1.2.1.16

Hydronic Boilers

Mechanical Room

Unknown

Hydronic Boilers

2015

1.2.1.17

Unit Heater

Mechanical Room

Trane

Trane Unit Heater

2004

1.2.1.18

Hydronic Expansion Tank

Mechanical Room

Amtrol

Amtrol X-Trol Tank 5T451

2013

1.2.1.19

Air Separator

Mechanical Room

Unknown

Air Separator

2004

1.2.1.20

49C Domestic Boiler #1

Mechanical Room

Lochnivar

Lochnivar Copper-Fin Model CWN0647PM

2015

1.2.1.21

49C Domestic Boiler #2

Mechanical Room

Lochnivar

Lochnivar Copper-Fin Model CWN0647PM

2015

1.2.1.22

60C Domestic Boiler #1

Mechanical Room

Lochnivar

Lochnivar Copper-Fin Model CWN0647PM

2015

1.2.1.23

60C Domestic Boiler #2

Mechanical Room

Lochnivar

Lochnivar Copper-Fin Model CWN0647PM

2004

1.2.1.24

Mixing Valve

Mechanical Room

Symmons

Hot Water Mixing Valve

2004

1.2.1.25

Hot Water Storage Tank

Mechanical Room

Lochinvar

Hot Water Storage Tank (x4)

2004

Asset Attribute Class

Description

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Not used in 11 years, have been maintained. Should be decommissioned and replaced with alternate humidification

Insulation ripping, air vent piping corroded but okay, previous leak

Some rust on pump discharge

1.2.2 Natural Gas Piping 1.2.2.1

$20,000.00

$0.00 Rooftop N.G. Piping

Rooftop

Unknown

Various N.G. Piping to Rooftop HVAC Units

2004

1.2.2.2

Gas Meter

Exterior

Union Gas

Union Gas Meter

2004

1.2.2.3

Boiler Stacks

Various

Unknown

Boiler Stacks

2004

Noticeable rust in locations. Valves & Handles rusted and could be an issue to operate. Paint recommended as part of regular maintenance.

1.2.3 Circulating Pumps

$10,000.00

1.2.3.1

Domestic Water Booster Skid

Mechanical Room

Bell & Gosset

Bell & Gossett Model70M-3

2004

One pump disconnected, recommended 1 replacement pump on hand

1.2.3.2

Mechanical Room

Bell & Gosset

Bell & Gossett Pump Model 80SC-BF

2004

Rust on pump casing

1.2.3.3

Mechanical Room

Bell & Gosset

Bell & Gossett Pump Model 80SC-BF

2004

$2,500.00

1.2.3.4

Mechanical Room

Bell & Gosset

Bell & Gossett Pump Model 80SC-B

2004

$2,500.00

1.2.3.5

Mechanical Room

Bell & Gosset

Bell & Gossett Pump Model 80SC-B

2004

$2,500.00

1.2.3.1

Kitchen Exhaust Fan

Rooftop

Loren Cook

Kitchen Exhaust Fan Model 245VH10B

2004

$2,500.00

1.2.3.2

EF-2

Rooftop

Loren Cook

Dishwasher Exhaust Fan Model 100R3B

2004

1.2.4 Ventilation

$2,500.00

$9,000.00

1.2.3.3

ACU-1

Rooftop

Trane

Air Cooled Condensing Unit Model TTA240BW00EA

2004

1.2.3.4

AHU-5

Rooftop

Trane

Trane Odyssyey MUA serving the Kitchen and Laundry

2004

1.2.3.5

AHU-6

Auditorium Mechanical Room

Trane

Trane Multi-Zone M-Series Climate Changer

2003

1.2.3.6

RTU’s 1-4

Rooftop

Trane

Trane RTU Model Unknown

2004

1.2.3.7

Louvre

Basement Laundry S-023A

Unknown

Basement Laundry Room Aluminium Louvre

2004

$1,500.00 Motor condenser fan is good. Moderate fin damage, should recombine. NE Condenser section should be cleaned, Refrigerant piping insulation is brittle. P-Trap rusted, Leaking from frame, should clear drain pan.

P-Trap open on bottom tee, some heating coils were dirty and should be cleaned

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Year of Installation

AC Unit

1.2.1.12

Class

Manufacturer

1.2.1.11

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Condition Rating

Identification

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset Hierarchy

Location

276 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Unknown

Basement Laundry Dryer Vents

Worn, lint should be cleaned

Room likely needs more exhaust air as Mop sink is showing signs of rust

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset 1.2.3.8

Dryer Vents

1.2.3.9

Wall Prop Fan

First Floor Janitor Closet

Unknown

Wall Exhaust Fan

1.2.3.10

Dishwasher Hood

1.2.3.11

Wall Prop Fan

W-106 & W-206

Unknown

Dishwasher Hood

2004

N-103

Unknown

Wall Prop Fan

2004

1.2.3.12

Grilles

Various Locations

Unknown

Duct Grilles

2004

1.2.3.13

Wall Prop Fan

Second Floor Common Room

Unknown

Wall Prop Exhaust Fan

2004

1.2.3.14

Exterior Louvre

Corridor E-200

Unknown

Exterior Louvre

2004

Galvanized with paint which is chipping

1.2.3.15

AHU-3A

Rooftop

Trane

RTU Unit Model Unknown

2004

Squeaky bearing, glycol good, heating coil dirty,

1.2.3.16

EF-3

Rooftop

Unknown

Dishwasher Exhaust

2004

$1,500.00

1.2.3.17

EF-4

Rooftop

Unknown

Dishwasher Exhaust

2004

$1,500.00

Greenheck

Rooftop Exhaust Fan Greenheck Model CUBE-098-4X

2004

$1,500.00

1.2.3.18 1.3

2004

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Basement Laundry S-023A

Attribute Facility

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

EF-1

Rooftop

2004

Runs Well

Could be cleaned

5 $500.00

$16,000.00

Plumbing 1.3.1 Fixtures

$8,000.00 1.3.1.1

Double Sink

1.3.1.2

Eye Wash

Basement Maintenance Room Basement Maintenance Room

Unknown

Double Sink

2004

Unknown

Eyewash Station

2004

1.3.1.3

Sink

Basement Lounge

Unknown

Basement Lounge Sink

2004

1.3.1.4

RO System

Basement

Unknown

Basement RO System

2010

1.3.1.5

Hand Sink

Basement Kitchen

Unknown

Basement Kitchen Hand Sink (x3)

2004

1.3.1.6

Double Sink

Basement Kitchen

Unknown

Basement Kitchen Double Sink

2004

1.3.1.7

Hand Sink

Basement S-020

Unknown

Basement Hand Sink

2004

1.3.1.8

Double Sink

Basement Laundry S-023

Unknown

Basement Kitchen Double Sink

2004

1.3.1.9

Mop Sink

Basement Laundry S-023A

Unknown

Basement Laundry Mop Sink

2004

No paddle switch, just ball valve

1.3.1.10

Mop Sink

First Floor Janitor Closet

Unknown

Janitor Closet Mop Sink

2004

1.3.1.11

Shower

First Floor

Unknown

Located b/w GL 6X & 3

2004

1.3.1.12

Hand Sink

First Floor

Unknown

Located b/w GL F & 4

2004

Unknown

Double Sink

2004

Unknown

Washer / Dryer in Activity Room

2004

Washer piping in good shape

Unknown

Exterior Hose Bibbs

2004

All Exterior hose bibs appear to be in good condition Flex supplies corroded

1.3.1.13

Double Sink

1.3.1.14

Washer / Dryer

1.3.1.15

Hose Bibbs

Activity S-137 & Activity S2337 Activity S-138 & Activity S237 Exterior

1.3.1.16

Sink

W-105 & W-205

Unknown

Sink (x3)

2004

1.3.1.17

Hand Sink

W-106A & W-206A

Unknown

Hand Sink

2004

1.3.1.18

Mop Sink

W-106A & W-206A

Unknown

Mop Sink

2004

1.3.1.19

Yard Hydrant

Exterior Stair N-2

Unknown

Yard Hydrant

2004

1.3.1.20

Mop Sink & Hand Sink

Janitor N-106

Unknown

Mop Sink & Hand Sink

2004

1.3.1.21

Hose Bibb

Exterior Stair S-3

Unknown

Exterior Hose Bibb

2004

1.3.1.22

Sink

Basement Servery

Unknown

Basement Servery Sink

2004

Surface rust Some corrosion on supports

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

277 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Asset Hierarchy

Identification

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

1.3.1.23

Raw Water Filters

Mechanical Room

Unknown

Raw Water Filters

2004

1.3.1.24

Soft Water Filter

Mechanical Room

Culligan

Culligan Hi-Floze

2004

1.3.2.1

Domestic Piping

Various

Copper

Domestic Piping

2004

1.3.2.2

HWS & HWR Piping

Various

Steel

Hot Water Piping

2004

1.3.2.3

Sanitary Piping

Various

Cast & PVC

Sanitary Piping

2004

1.3.2.4

Storm Piping

Various

Cast

PVC Storm Piping

2004

Except discharge elbow cracks

Domestic Booster Expansion Tank Domestic Hot Water Recirculation pump

Basement Mechanical Room Basement Mechanical Room

Amtrol

Therm-X-Trol Expansion tank

2004

Rust through paint

$6,000.00

Bell & Gossett

B*G booster pump 1BL068 G90

2004

-5

Rusted with previous leak

$2,000.00

RO System

Basement RO Closet

Culligan

RO System Piping

2004

Class Asset Attribute Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Poor operation & reliability, currently under contract to replace

1.3.2 Piping & Equipment

1.3.2.6 1.3.2.7 1.3.2.10 1.4

$8,000.00 $8,000.00

$2,950.00

Electrical 1.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00

1.4.1.1

Distribution Transformer

Exterior

CAMTRAN

Utility owned 1000KVA 27600/1600V 3PH Pad Mounted Transformer

Unknown

1.4.1.2

Switchboard AAA

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

347/600V 3PH 4W, 1200A

2004

1.4.1.5

Meter Base

Exterior

General Electric

Building Meter Base

Unknown

1.4.1.6

Solar Meter Base

Electrical Room S-014

General Electric

Solar Meter Base

2013

1.4.1.7

Solar Disconnect Switch

Electrical Room S-014

Eaton

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 60A, 600VAC

2013

1.4.1.8

Main Solar Disconnect

Electrical Room S-014

Square D

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 60A, 600VAC

2013

1.4.1.9

Solar DC Inverters

Roof

Aurora

PV DC + AC Disconnect

2013

1.4.1.10

Solar Panels

Roof

Unknown

Roof mounted solar array.

2013

Unknown Unknown 15

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

1.4.2 Distribution System

$2,950.00

1.4.2.1

Main Disconnect Switch

Mechanical Room

Siemens

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 100A, 240VAC

2004

1.4.2.2

DP-BEAA2 Panelboard

Mechanical Room E-000

Siemens

600V, Max 225A

2004

1.4.2.3

TX-BEB2 Transformer

Mechanical Room

BEMAG

30KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Manufacturer

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Location

278 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

1.4.2.4

RP-BEB2 Panelboard

Mechanical Room E-000

Siemens

120/208V, Max 225A

2004

1.4.2.5

DP-BAA2 Panelboard

Mechanical Room E-000

Siemens

600V, Max 225A

2004

1.4.2.6

TX-BB5 Transformer

Mechanical Room E-000

Siemens

15KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.7

RP-BB5 Panelboard

Mechanical Room E-000

Siemens

120/208V, Max 225A

2004

1.4.2.8

DP-BEAA1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

347/600V 3PH 4W, 600A

2004

1.4.2.9

TX-BEBB1 Transformer

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

112.5KVA ,600V-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.10

DP-BEBB1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 600A Max

2004

1.4.2.11

RP-BEB1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.12

TX-BBB1 Transformer

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

225KVA, 600V-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.13

DP-BBB1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 1200A

2004

1.4.2.14

LP-BB1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.15

RP-BB2 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.16

RP-BB3 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.17

RP-BB4 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.18

LP-BA1 Panelboard

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

347/600V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.19 Lighting Contactor LP-BA1

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

347/600V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.20

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

347/600V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

DP-BAA1 Panelboard

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

279 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

1.4.2.21

TX-1B3 Transformer

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.22

TX-1B3 Transformer

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.23

TX-2P Transformer

Electrical Room S-014

Siemens

300KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.24

DP-2P Panelboard

Electrical Room S-005

Unknown

120/208V, 3PH 4W, 1600A

1968

-21

1.4.2.25

Panel E Panelboard

Room A-108A

Square D

120/208V 3PH 4W, 100A

2014

1.4.2.26

Panel G Panelboard

Room A-108A

Square D

120/208V 3PH 3W, 200A

2014

1.4.2.27 Panel 1N6201 Panelboard

Room A-201

Square D

347/600V 3PH 4W, 225A

2014

1.4.2.28

TX-1G Transformer

Room A-201

Square D

45KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2014

1.4.2.29

DP-1BB2 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-103

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.30

RP-1B6 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-103

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.31

RP-1B7 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-103

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.32

RP-1EB2 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-103

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.33

TX-1BB2 Transformer

Electrical Closet N-103

Unknown

75 KVA, 600-120/208V, 3PH

2004

1.4.2.34

TX-1EB2 Transformer

Electrical Closet N-103

Unknown

30KVA, 600-120/208V, 3PH

2004

1.4.2.35

DP-1BB1 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.36

RP-1B1 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.37

RP-1B2 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Appears Original and should be replaced in 5 years based on condition rating Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

280 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

1.4.2.38

RP-1B3 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.39

RP-1EB1 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.40

TX-1EB1 Transformer

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

30KVA 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.41

TX-1BB1 Transformer

Electrical Closet W-104

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.42

RP-1EB3 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.43

RP-1B10 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.44

RP-1B11 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.45

DP-1BB3 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.46

TX-1EB3 Transformer

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

30KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.47

TX-1BB3 Transformer

Electrical Closet S-112

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.48

DP-2BB2 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-211

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.49

RP-2B6 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-211

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.50

RP-2B7 Panelboard

Electrical Closet N-211

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.51

TX-2BB2 Transformer

Electrical Closet N-211

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.52

DP-2BB1 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-204

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.53

RP-2B1 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-204

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.54

RP-2B2 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-204

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

281 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

1.4.2.55

RP-2B3 Panelboard

Electrical Closet W-204

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.56

TX-2BB1 Transformer

Electrical Closet W-204

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.57

DP-2BB3 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-212

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 400A Max

2004

1.4.2.58

RP-2B11 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-212

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 250A Max

2004

1.4.2.59

RP-2B10 Panelboard

Electrical Closet S-212

Siemens

120/208V 3PH 4W, 225A Max

2004

1.4.2.60

TX-2BB3 Transformer

Electrical Closet S-212

Siemens

75KVA, 600-120/208V 3PH 4W

2004

1.4.2.61

Cooler #1 Disconnect

Exterior

RefPlus

240V 11.4A, Motor 1/4HP 1.7A

2004

1.4.2.62

Garbage Cooler Disconnect

Exterior

RefPlus

240V 13.9A, Motor 1/2HP 2.9A

2004

1.4.2.63

Cooler #2 Disconnect

Exterior

RefPlus

240V 11.4A, Motor 1/4HP 1.7A

2004

1.4.2.64 Freezer Cooler Disconnect

Exterior

RefPlus

240V 23.9A, Motor 1/2HP 2.9A

2004

1.4.2.65

A/C Disconnects

Exterior

Midwest

Non-fused disconnect

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.66

Well Pump Disconnect

Exterior

Square D

General Purpose Enclosed Switch

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.67

Vertical Lift Disconnect

Foyer A-101

Square D

General Duty Safety Switch

2014

1.4.2.68

Supply Fan Main Electrical Room Disconnect

Room A-201

Square D

Fan Disconnect and Control Panel

2014

1.4.2.69

Return Fan Main Electrical Room Disconnect

Room A-201

Square D

Fan Disconnect and Control Panel

2014

1.4.2.70

F-1 Exhaust Fan

Room A-201

Square D

Exhaust Fan Disconnect and Control Panel

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.71

Dishwasher Exhaust Fan #3 Disconnect

Kitchen S-015

Cutler Hammer

Exhaust Fan Disconnect and Control Panel

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

10A

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

$500.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

282 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Life Expectancy (years)

Pump Control Panel

Mechanical Room E-000

Torna Tech

Pump No. 1, No.2 and No. 3 Control Panel. 600V Line, 120V - Control, 24.5A pump FLA

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.73

Pump Control Panel

Mechanical Room E-000

Torna Tech

Pump No. 1, No.2 and No. 3 Control Panel. 600V Line, 120V - Control

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.74

Well Pump Controller

Mechanical Room E-000

Cutler-Hammer

Pump controller with low water alarm, 2 pumps

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.75

HTG. Pump Controllers

Mechanical Room E-000

Cutler-Hammer

HTG. Pumps 1 to 4, disconnect and HOA

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.76

49 C Dom. Recirc Pump On/Off

Mechanical Room E-000

Cutler-Hammer

Pump On/Off Switches

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.77

60 C Dom. Recirc Pump On/Off

Mechanical Room E-000

Cutler-Hammer

Pump On/Off Switches

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.78

Kitchen Exhaust Fan #1 Control Panel

Kitchen S-015

Cutler-Hammer

Fusible Disconnect Combination Fan Panel

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.4.2.79

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of fixtures including wall sconces, troffers, fluorescent/LED strip fixtures, pot lights, ceiling fans and keyless fixtures, occupancy sensors in new areas of building.

Various

Generally appear to be in fair condition. Some ballast and bulb replacement necessary.

1.4.2.80

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Various

Mixture of area lighting, pot lights, Pole mounted lighting,

Various

Generally appear to be in fair condition. Recommend to replace in 10-15 years based on condition rating.

Conduit and wire observed appeared to be in good condition. Providing covers for boxes without covers should be considered.

Asset Attribute Class

Attribute

Asset

1.4.2.81

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and box cable. Varying Installation Date.

Various

Various 1 1

1.5

Comments/ Identified Need

Replace 15A rooftop receptacles with 20A GFCI receptacles. Install GFCI receptacles at receptacle locations within 1.5m of sinks.

$500.00

$0.00 1.5.1.1

Elevator

East Elevator

N/A

Service Elevator

2004

1.5.1.2

Elevator

West Elevator

N/A

Resident Elevator

2004

Lift System

Auditorium

N/A

Wheelchair Lift System

2014

No reported issues. Rating based on life expectancy No reported issues. Rating based on life expectancy

1.5.2 Lift Systems

$0.00 No reported issues. Rating based on life expectancy $1,010,000.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 1.6.1

$1,010,000.00 1.6.1.1

Parking / Driveway

1.6.1.2

Parking / Driveway

Entrance Lane and Main Parking Lot Secondary Lanes and Parking Areas

Asphalt

11A

Generally poor - moderate to severe cracking Generally acceptable - moderate wear and cracking

$600,000.00 $400,000.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

1.5.2.1

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$450.00

$0.00

Elevators 1.5.1 Elevator

1.6

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Year of Installation

1.4.2.72

Class

Current Age (years)

Manufacturer

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Condition Rating

Identification

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset Hierarchy

Location

283 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

1.7

Class

Concrete

Generally good, localized cracking/ delamination requiring repair work

Concrete

Good condition

Attribute

Asset 1.6.1.3

Sidewalks / Curbs

1.6.1.4

Patio Area

Various

$10,000.00

$18,500.00

Life Safety (includes generator) 1.7.1 Emergency Power System

$0.00

1.7.1.1

Automatic Transfer Switch ATS-01

Electrical Room S-014

ASCO

600A 347/600V 3PH 4W

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.7.1.2

Generator

Exterior

Generac

Generac Power Systems. 250kW, 600V

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in fair condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

1.7.2 Fire Alarm System

$3,500.00

1.7.2.1

Jockey Pump Controller

Mechanical Room

Torna Tech

600V - Line, 120V - Control

2004

1.7.2.2

Fire Pump Controller

Mechanical Room

Torna Tech

600V - Line, 600V/120V/24V - Control

2004

1.7.2.3

Fire Pump Power Transfer Switch

Mechanical Room

Torna Tech

600V - Line, 24V - Control

2004

1.7.2.4

Smoke/ Heat Detector

Various

Ceiling mounted smoke/ heat detector.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.7.2.5

Fire Alarm

Various

Cerberus Pyrotronics

Wall mounted annunciators. Ringer style.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.7.2.6

Fire Pull Stations

Various

Wall mounted fire alarm pull stations

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

1.7.2.7

Fire Alarm Panel

Foyer A-101

Siemens

FireFinder Fire Alarm Panel

2014

1.7.3 Emergency Lighting System

$3,500.00

$15,000.00

1.7.3.1

Emergency Lighting

Various

Standard light fixtures powered by the emergency power system.

Various

1.7.3.2

Exit Signs

Various

Unknown

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

Various

Generally appear to be in good condition. Recommend Replace in 10-20 years based on condition rating. Appear to have some wear and tear. Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

1.7.4 Barrier Free

$15,000.00 $0.00

Barrier Free Door Entry

Various

Barrier Free Access

Various

1.7.4.2

Vertical Lift

Foyer

Garaventa

Genesis Enclosure Model Vertical Platform Lift

2014

12A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

1.7.4.1

1.7.5 Misc.

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Condition Rating

Attribute Facility

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Comments/ Identified Need

Description

Current Age (years)

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life) Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Manufacturer

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

284 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Condition Rating

Some rust, rented

Various

Mixture of heaters including baseboard and wall mounted heaters.

Unknown

1.7.6.1

Propane Tank

Exterior

Levac LTD

Propane Tank

2004

1.7.6.2

Dry Pipe Sprinklers

Basement

Unknown

Dry Pipe Sprinklers

2004

1.7.6.3

Sprinkler Zone Valve

W-106A

Unknown

Sprinkler Zone Valve

2004

1.7.6.4

Fire Hose Cabinet

Various Locations

Unknown

Fire Hose Cabinets

2004

1.7.6.5

Fire Pump Skid

Mechanical Room

ITT Fluid

ITT Fluid Products Model 5X5X7

2004

Attribute

Current Age (years)

Life Expectancy (years)

Year of Installation

Manufacturer

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

Heaters

Asset Class

1.7.5.1

Class

Facility

Comments/ Identified Need

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Attribute

Asset

Unknown Unknown

1.7.6

$0.00

County of Frontenac Administration Office Building (Old House) 2.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset Hierarchy

Location

285 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

$264,950.00

Architectural & Structural

$252,100.00

2.1.1 Building Structure

$91,000.00

2.1.1.1

Foundation

Basement

N/A

Stone masonry foundation walls with local brick and block fill-ins

1925

-34

Fair to poor condition. Some moderate deterioration of stone mortar. Some major deterioration of mortar in isolated locations

$50,000.00

2.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

Basement

N/A

Concrete, +/- 100 mm thick

1925

-34

Fair-poor condition. Moderate to heavy wear throughout, moderate cracking, rough/uneven surface

$15,000.00

2.1.1.3

Building Structure

Interior / Office Space

N/A

CMU walls

1925

-34

No obvious issues

2.1.1.4

Exterior Foundation Walls

Perimeter

N/A

Stone masonry

1925

-34

Generally fair condition. Isolated poor location - concrete lintel @ window sill requires repair

$3,000.00

Concrete piers supporting steel columns in basement. 1 good, 1 fair, 3 poor. Moderate to heavy deterioration of concrete. Concrete piers supporting back entrance canopy. 2 fair - minor to moderate deterioration

$5,000.00

2.1.1.5

Piers

Basement / Back Entrance

Concrete

2.1.1.6

Columns & Baseplates

Basement

Steel

1925

-34

Good condition

2.1.1.7

Ceiling/Floor Joists

Floor of Attic

2x12 wood joists

1925

-34

Generally poor condition. Space is being used for M&E routing only.

Good condition

Generally good/fair with minor wear.

2.1.1.8

Windows

2.1.1.9

Light Pole Supports

1925 Various

Exterior Pads

Various

2.1.1.11

Retaining Wall

Front side of building

Retaining wall along driveway

2.1.1.12

Retaining Wall Railing

Front side of building

On top of retaining wall along driveway

Generally good condition. Light rusting

Front Entrance

Stone masonry

1925

Poor condition - significant deterioration, needs replacing or repair

Back Entrance

Concrete

1925

Good condition

2.1.1.13 2.1.1.14

Pillar Supports

1925

2.1.2 Building Envelope

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

-64

1 pad @ east of building is in poor condition, needs replacing Fair - some cracking and delamination @ top of wall. Typically at locations of cast-in posts

$3,000.00

$15,000.00

$69,100.00

13A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

2.1.1.10

Asset Hierarchy

Identification

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

2.1.2.1

Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

Exterior Insulation Finishing System (EIFS) on stucco, CMU structure

2010

Good - Year of installation for EIFS System. Minor patching recommended at north door of boardroom as part of general maintenance

2.1.2.2

Exterior Doors

Exterior / Main Entrance / Ground Floor / Link

N/A

Glazed aluminum entrance doors

2003

Fair - No obvious issues

2.1.2.3

Exterior Doors

Exterior / North and South

N/A

North/South Entrance Doors, Painted Metal Residential doors

2000

Acceptable - Doors are at the end of their expected service life but experience very low traffic. Recommend budgeting for replacement within 10 years.

$2,500.00

Varies

Paint failing and seals of sidelights and transom windows showing signs of failing. Recommend budgeting for replacement of entire door unit for improved performance.

$2,000.00

Class Asset Attribute Class

Attribute

Asset

2.1.2.4

Exterior Doors

Exterior / Board Room

N/A

West Door, Painted metal residential door and wood frame

2.1.2.5

Exterior Doors

Exterior / East Small Room

N/A

Wood Door, Wood Frame

2003

Repainting as part of regular maintenance is recommended to extend the life of the door.

Not Applicable

2.1.2.6

Exterior Windows

Exterior / Ground Floor / Second Floor

N/A

Vinyl Windows Throughout Building

2004

Acceptable - No obvious issues - Showing appropriate wear for age. Recommend replacement within 10 years based on age.

$41,000.00

Acceptable - showing wear - Recommend replacement within 5 years based on probable age and low performance single pane.

$20,600.00

Caulking failing at exterior, Paint Chipping, interior GWB sills showing water damage. Repairs recommended.

$3,000.00

2.1.2.6

Exterior Windows

Exterior / Board Room

N/A

Aluminum clad single pane Wood Windows in Board Room: pairs of casement windows with semicircular transoms

1989

-5

2.1.3 Roof

$50,000.00 2.1.3.1

2010

Good - no major issues uncharacteristic for age observed - localized degranulation at dormer runoff observed.

2010

Good - no obvious issues

Acceptable - Replacement recommendation based on age of installations

$30,000.00

Railings only 600 mm high. Do not meet code as guardrails.

$20,000.00

Roof Assembly

Exterior / Sloped Roof

2.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

Exterior / Sloped Roof

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

2.1.3.3

Roof Assembly

Exterior / Front Porch

N/A

Copper Roof

2.1.3.4

Roof Assembly

Exterior / Flat Roofs / Various (Link, North West Roof, South West Bay, South East Roof)

N/A

Flat Roof Membranes (Modified Bitumen, EPDM Membrane) - Various locations

2.1.3.5

Rooftop Railing

Flatroofs/Balconies

N/A

Metal railings around flat roof areas

First Floor

N/A

Gypsum Wall Board, Lath and Plaster

varies

Finished surfaces - no obvious issues

Second Floor

N/A

Gypsum Wall Board or Lath and Plaster

varies

Finished surfaces - no obvious issues

2004

2.1.2.4 2.1.2.5

$42,000.00 Interior Walls

14A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

N/A

Asphalt Shingles, Engineered Wood Rafters, OWSJ Deck

2.1.4 Building Interior

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Manufacturer

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Location

286 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

N/A

Wood Solid with wood frame

1925

Good - no obvious issues

varies

Finished surfaces - no obvious issues

varies

East Office - Water damage at ceiling at chimney. Localized ceiling repairs required. Indicator of potential roof leak at flat roof above. Recommend investigation and repairs of underlying issue.

varies

Finished surface - no obvious issues

Attribute

Asset 2.1.2.6

Interior Doors

2.1.2.7

First Floor

N/A

Gypsum wall board, lath and plaster, suspended acoustic tile

Second Floor

N/A

Gypsum wall board, lath and plaster, suspended acoustic tile

Interior Ceilings

2.1.2.8

2.1.2.9

Interior Floors

2.1.2.10 2.2

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Interior/Through Out

Attribute Facility

Comments/ Identified Need

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

First Floor

N/A

Carpeting, Vinyl Plank

2004

Finished surface - no obvious issues - Older Carpet to rear of building showing some wear (aesthetic). Carpets in generally fair condition. Recommend replacement of all carpet within 10 years based on age.

Second Floor

N/A

Carpeting, Vinyl Plank

2004

Finished surface - no obvious issues

2.2.1.1

$40,000.00

$3,000.00 Electric Hot Water Tank

Basement

John Wood

John Wood Proline Model E50TE-30240 250

2018

2.2.1.2

Radiator

Basement

Unknown

Radiator near stairs

2004

Some rust , fins could be cleaned

2.2.1.3

Radiator

Basement

Markhot

Radiator near Air Compressor

2004

Some rust @ elbows

2009

Runs well

2009

Runs well

2.2.1.4

Air Compressor

Basement

Omega

2.2.1.5

Air Dryer

Basement

Hankison

Air Compressor for HVAC Controls, Omega Model CC07530-115M Air Dryer for HVAC Controls, Hankison Model HPR510

2.2.1.6

Thermostat

First Floor Office

Honeywell

Honeywell T-Stat

2004

2.2.1.7

Split AC Unit

First Floor Office

Goodman

Office Split AC Unit

2004

Not used

2.2.1.8

Radiators

First Floor

Unknown

Hot Water Radiators

2004

Fins dirty, could be cleaned

2.2.1.9

Split AC Unit

First Floor Breakroom

Goodman

Goodman 1 Ton Split AC Unit Model WMC-12-1-KF AC

2004

Not used, missing one neoprene pad. Pipe insulation is damaged. Condenser fan shaft is rusty.

2.2.1.10

Split AC Unit

Meeting Room

Eubank

Goodman Split AC unit

2004

Functional

2.2.1.11

Radiators

Second Floor

Unknown

Hot Water Radiators

2004

Fins dirty, could be cleaned

2.2.1.12

AC Unit Condenser

Second Floor Balcony

Eubank

AC Unit Condenser

2004

Some rust, fins are good & clean.

2.2.4.1

Fan Coil Unit

Basement IT Storage

Unico

Unico Green Series

2004

Blower Module M4860BL1-EC1, Cooling Module Model M4860CL1-E

2.2.4.2

Ductwork

Basement

Unknown

High Pressure Ductwork

2004

2.2.4.3

Diffusers

Second Floor

Unknown

Ceiling Diffusers

2004

Could be cleaned.

2.2.4.4

Fan Coil Unit

Attic

Goodman

Goodman FC Unit in Attic

2004

Condenser not accessible.

2.2.4 Ventilation

$3,000.00

$6,000.00

2.3.1 Fixtures

$0.00 2.3.1.2

Sink

Kitchen

Unknown

Kitchen Sink

2.3.2 Piping

2004

4 $0.00

15A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

$6,000.00 $0.00

Plumbing

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$2,000.00

$9,000.00

HVAC 2.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

2.3

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

287 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Some sections need insulation, some asbestos insulation indicated.

Manufacturer

Unknown

Basement Domestic Piping

HWS & HWR

First Floor

Unknown

First Floor Radiator Piping

2004

Requires insulation

HWS & HWR

Second Floor

Unknown

First Floor Radiator Piping

2004

Requires insulation

Asset Attribute

2.4

2004

Basement

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Attribute

Asset 2.3.2.1

Domestic Piping

2.3.2.2 2.3.2.3

$3,850.00

Electrical 2.4.1 Incoming Services 2.4.1.1

$0.00 Disconnect Switch

Basement

Square D

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 200A, 240VAC

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

2.4.2 Distribution System

$2,350.00

2.4.2.1

Panel 1E Disconnect Switch

Basement

Square D

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 100A, 240VAC

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.2

Splitter

Basement

Hydel

125A, Max 600V, 3PH 3 W

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.3

Splitter A House Power

Basement

Hydel

125A, Max 600V, 3PH 3 W

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.4

Panel A Panelboard

Basement

Square D

Max 225A, 120/208 VAC, 3PH

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.5

Panel B Panelboard

Basement

Square D

Max 225A, 120/208 VAC, 3PH

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.6

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of fixtures including wall sconces, troffers, fluorescent/LED strip fixtures, pot lights, ceiling fans and keyless fixtures,

2004

2.4.2.7

Exterior Lighting

Various

Mixture of area lighting, pole-mounted and hanging light fixtures. Photocell Operated

2004

2.4.2.8

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and box cable.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.10

A/C Disconnect

Basement

Square D

General Duty Safety Switch 100A, 240VAC, 2nd Floor Unknown A/C Disconnect

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.11

A/C Disconnect

Exterior

Midwest

60A 1PH Non-Fused AC Disconnect

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.2.12

Compressor Controls

Basement

Square D

Definite purpose Controls Compressor Controller

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

$750.00

2.4.3.1

Generator

$0.00 Exterior

Generac

Generac Power Systems, 45kW

16A

2004

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Generally appears to be in fair condition. Building exterior cable chase and flex conduit have been damaged and require repair.

2.4.3 Emergency Power System

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

288 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

2.4.3.2

Automatic Transfer Switch

Basement

ASCO

200A, 120/208V

2004

2.4.3.3

Transfer Switch Disconnect

Basement

Cutler-Hammer

Heavy Duty Safety Switch, 200A, 250V

2004

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

2.4.4 Barrier Free 2.4.4.1

$0.00 Barrier Free

Various

Barrier Free Access

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

2.4.5 Fire Alarm System

$1,500.00

2.4.5.1

Smoke Detector

Various

Ceiling mounted smoke detector.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.5.2

Fire Alarm

Various

Unknown

Wall mounted annunciators. Ringer style.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.5.3

Fire Pull Stations

Various

Wall mounted fire alarm pull stations

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Generally appears to be in fair condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

2.4.6 Emergency Lighting System

$0.00

2.4.6.1

Emergency Lighting

Various

Lumacell

Emergency Battery Units c/w remote lamps. Remote heads.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

2.4.6.2

Exit Signs

Various

Unknown

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

$0.00 2.4.7.1

Baseboard Heating

Various

Unknown

Electric Baseboard Heater

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. $0.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 2.5.1

$0.00 2.5.1.1

Garden Retaining Wall

Front Entrance

Retaining wall for garden

Good condition

2.5.1.2 Interlocking Brick Walkway

Front of Building

Walkway to approach building from road

Good condition

2.5.1.3

East of Building

Walkway to patio area

Fair condition

Sidewalk

Palace Road Ambulance Base 3.1

$96,000.00 $88,000.00

Architectural & Structural 3.1.1 Building Structure

$35,000.00 Foundation

3.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

3.1.1.4

Building Structure

Below Grade / Full Structure

N/A

Concrete

1988

Isolated deterioration at NE corner of building

Interior / Vehicle Bays

N/A

Concrete slab

2009

Fair - minor cracking, has been repaired

Interior / Vehicle Bays

N/A

290 mm and 190 mm CMU walls, OWSJ and steel deck roof structure

1988

Fair - minor wear

Interior / Office Space

N/A

CMU walls

1988

No obvious issues

17A

$5,000.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

3.1.1.1

3.1.1.3

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$1,500.00

Generally appears to be in fair condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appear to be in good condition. Replacement in future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

2.4.7 Misc.

2.5

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

289 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

3.1.1.5

Exterior Walls

Perimeter of Vehicle Bays, 3 Sides of Office Space

N/A

290 mm and 190 mm CMU walls, full height of building

1988

No obvious issues

3.1.1.6

Columns

Interior / Between Overhead Doors

N/A

Steel flashing around columns

1988

3.1.1.7

Guardrail

Exterior / Office Roof

N/A

Non-penetrating guardrail system

2009

3.1.1.8

Windows

Exterior

N/A

Steel Lintels-Office Space

1988

-1

Fair - light to moderate rust

Bollards

Exterior / Between Overhead Doors

N/A

Steel with concrete fill

2009

Fair - light-moderate rusting

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Attribute

Asset

3.1.1.9

Acceptable - moderate rusting at bases (exposed to salt) Poor - several connection bolts missing at post feet, light to moderate rust, weld on ladder brace has let go

3.1.2 Building Envelope

3.1.2.1

3.1.2.2

$10,000.00 $20,000.00

$35,000.00

Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

90mm brick masonry; 25mm air space; 50mm rigid insulation; and 290mm concrete block.

5 1988

29 1

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Painted Steel Doors (2 locations)

2009

Appears to be in good condition but requires localized repairs at south facing façade. Localized Masonry Repairs required at various areas of south façade. Fair - light-moderate rusting at frame bases, paint chipping. Acceptable - showing signs of wear, painting recommended as part of routine maintenance. Though at their expected service life there have been no reported concerns. The County may want to consider replacement to bring entrance glazing up to current performance standards. Caulking - Fair - showing signs of wear

3.1.2.4

Exterior Doors

Exterior/Corridor Ends

N/A

Metal Doors with original wood framed fixed windows set at the east and west entrance doors of main corridor.

1988

-1

3.1.2.3

Exterior Overhead Doors

Exterior/Garage

N/A

Insulated Metal Overhead Doors (x4)

2009

3.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior

N/A

Vinyl Windows Throughout Building

2009

2010

Fair - no obvious issues. Life expectancy for Asphalt Shingles.

2010

Good - no obvious issues

Acceptable - Moderate wear shown for age. No concerns reported from user group. Anticipated Replacement within ten years due to age.

Acceptable - Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be anticipated within 10 year window. Fair - No obvious issues - Showing appropriate wear for age.

3.1.3 Roof

$2,000.00

$23,000.00

$10,000.00

$18,000.00 3.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

Exterior / Sloped Roof

N/A

Asphalt Shingles, Engineered Wood Rafters, OWSJ Deck

3.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

Exterior / Sloped Roof

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

N/A

Built-up felt and asphalt membrane with pea-gravel surfacing

3.1.3.3

Roof Assembly

Exterior / Flat Roof

2009

3.1.4 Building Interior

$18,000.00 $0.00

3.1.4.1

Interior Walls

Interior / Various

N/A

Gypsum Wallboard

2009

Fair - Typical wear from daily use. Painting recommended as part of regular maintenance.

3.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior / Various

N/A

Metal Doors/Metal Frame

2009

Fair - No obvious issues

3.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Corridor / Kitchen / Washrooms / Office Space

N/A

Resilient Tile Floors, Resilient Sheet Floors

2009

Fair - No obvious issues

18A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

290 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

N/A

Gypsum Wallboard Ceilings/Suspended Acoustic Tile

Comments/ Identified Need

2009

Fair - No obvious issues

Attribute

Asset 3.1.4.4

3.2

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Interior / Various

Attribute Facility

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Interior Ceilings

$8,000.00

HVAC 3.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

3.3

$8,000.00

3.2.1.1

Radiant Heater #1

Ambulance Bay

Infrasave

Radiant Heater

2009

3.2.1.2 3.2.1.3

Radiant Heater #2

Ambulance Bay

Wall Prop Fan

Ambulance Bay

3.2.1.4

Thermostat

Ambulance Bay

3.2.1.5

C0 Detector

Ambulance Bay

3.2.1.6

Fan Switch

3.2.1.7

Exhaust Fan

3.2.1.8 3.2.1.9

Infrasave

Radiant Heater

2009

Canarm

Ambulance Bay Wall Prop Fan

2009

Honeywell

Ambulance Bay T-Stat

2009

Honeywell

Ambulance Bay CO Detector

2009

Ambulance Bay

Canarm

Wall Prop Fan Switch

2009

Utility Room

Unknown

Utility Room EF

2009

DHW Pump

Utility Room

Grundfos

DHW Distribution Pump

2009

$1,000.00

DHWT

Utility Room

A.O. Smith

A.O. Smith Cyclone 120K BTU

2009

$7,000.00

3.2.1.10

RTU

Rooftop

Carrier

Carrier Weathermaster Model 48HJE004-351HQ

2009

3.2.1.11

CUH

Medical Storage

Outlett

Electric CUH

2009

3.2.1.14

Generator Piping

Exterior

Unknown

Generator Piping

2009

3.2.1.15

Grille

Medical Storage

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.16

Door Grille

Kitchen

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.17

Grille

Kitchen

Unknown

RA Grille

2009

3.2.1.18

Exhaust Fan

Women’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.19

Louvre

Women’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.20

Supply Diffuser

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.21

Door Grille

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.22

Louvre

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.23

Louvre

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.2.1.24

Grille

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

Transfer b/w Men’s Washroom & Office (x2)

2009

3.2.1.25

Grille

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

RA Grille

2009

3.2.1.26

Grille

Crew Room

Unknown

SA Grille (x3)

2009

Interior condenser fins were dirty, Rust on piping, could be painted Showing some signs of rust Grille can be cleaned

$0.00

Plumbing 3.3.1 Fixtures

$0.00 3.3.1.1

Hand Sink

Utility Room

Unknown

2009

Hose Reel

Ambulance Bay

Unknown

Manual Hose Reel w/ mixing valve

2009

3.3.1.3

Eyewash Station

Ambulance Bay

Guardian

Eyewash Station

2009

3.3.1.4

TSP

Ambulance Bay

Mifab

Trap Seal Primer

2009

Radio Cabinet

Zurn

Backflow Preventer

2009

Radio Cabinet

Pro Flex

Pro Flex 2 PH-5

2009

Ambulance Bay

Unknown

2009

3.3.1.6 3.3.1.7

Water Entry Backflow Preventer Water Entry Expansion Tank Manual Mixing Valve Hose Reel

3.3.1.8

Sink c/w R0 System

Kitchen

Unknown

R0 System - Vectapure 360

2009

3.3.1.9

Sink c/w R0 System

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2009

3.3.2 Piping

$0.00

19A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

3.3.1.2

3.3.1.5

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

291 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

3.3.2.1

Roof Drain Piping

Ambulance Bay

Unknown

2009

3.3.2.2

Water Entry

Radio Cabinet

Unknown

2009

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

3.4

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Uninsulated $0.00

Electrical (includes generator) 3.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00

3.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Electrical Closet

Square D

200A, 120/208V, 1PH

2009

3.4.1.2

Disconnect Switch

Electrical Closet

Square D

200A Heavy Duty Safety Switch

2009

3.4.1.3

Meter Base

Exterior

FlexNet

Building Meter Base

Unknown

3.4.1.4

Solar Disconnect Switch

Electrical Closet

Cutler-Hammer

125A, 120/240V Sub Panel, 60A Main Disconnect

2010

3.4.1.5

Solar Panel Array

Roof

Evergreen

Roof mounted solar array.

2010

3.4.1.6

Solar Meter Base

Exterior

FlexNet

Solar Meter Base

Unknown

3.4.1.7

Main Solar Disconnect

Exterior

Eaton

General Duty Safety Switch 60A, 240VAC

2010

3.4.1.8

Solar DC Inverters

Ambulance Bay

Aurora

PVI 5kW, 240 VAC 1PH

2010

Unknown Unknown

N/A

3.4.2 Distribution System

$0.00

3.4.2.1

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of wall sconce, pot lights, troffers, and fluorescent/LED strip fixtures

2009

3.4.2.2

Exterior Lighting

Various

Square L

Mixture of soffit pot lights, area lighting. Photocell Operated

2009

3.4.2.3

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable.

Various

Generally appear to be in fair condition. Some fixtures require bulb replacement or fixture repair. Replace bulbs as required. Clean insects from fixtures. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace bulbs and replace/repair fixtures as required. Conduit and wire observed appeared to be in good condition.

3.4.3 Emergency Power System

$0.00

Generator

Exterior

Generac

QuietSource Series, wireless generator monitoring system

2009

3.4.3.2

Automatic Transfer Switch

Electrical Closet

Unknown

200A Transfer Switch

2009

Various

Ceiling mounted Smoke alarms. Receptacle/ wall mounted Carbon Monoxide Alarms.

Various

Emergency Battery Units c/w remote lamps. Remote heads.

3.4.4.1

$0.00 Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Various

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration.

3.4.5 Emergency Lighting System 3.4.5.1

Emergency Lighting

$0.00 Various

20A

2009

Generally appear to be in good condition.

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

3.4.3.1

3.4.4 Fire Alarm System

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

292 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Lumacell

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

2009

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Various

Attribute Facility

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Generally appear to be in good condition. Replacement in future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

Attribute

Asset 3.4.5.2

Exit Signs

3.4.6 Misc.

$0.00 3.4.6.1

3.5

Electric Heaters

Various

Ouellet

Wall-mounted electric heater.

2009

$0.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 3.5.1

$0.00 3.5.1.1

Parking Lot

Outside of Vehicle Bays

Asphalt

Fair - minor wear and cracking

3.5.1.2

Sidewalk

Main Entrance, Rear Entrance

Concrete

Fair - minor cracking and rust

Sydenham Ambulance Base 4.1

$16,648.00 $11,000.00

Architectural & Structural 4.1.1 Building Structure

$1,000.00

4.1.1.1

Foundation

N/A

4.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

4.1.1.3

Building Structure

N/A

2011

4.1.1.4

Exterior Walls

N/A

2011

4.1.1.5

Columns

N/A

2011

4.1.1.6

Bike Rack

4.1.1.7

Windows

4.1.1.8

Bollards

Around Vehicle Bay Section

Exterior Walls

Exterior

Vehicle Bays

Concrete

2011

No obvious issues

Concrete, in-slab heating throughout

2011

Fair - minor cracking, crack repair product present (applied by contractor)

Mostly not observable - no obvious issues

Acceptable - moderate rust

Fair - light to moderate rusting

Good - No obvious issues

Minor Repairs - Mortar is failing at sidelight base to be sealed with Caulking. Door seals at main entrance require ongoing maintenance. Original seal replaced after original install but reported to not be functioning at an acceptable level. Recommend assessment.

Not Applicable

Acceptable - Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 10 year window.

$10,000.00

Fair - Door from Garage showing wear

Recommend painting exterior door from garage as part of general maintenance

Good - No obvious issues

Caulking required to seal gaps between window jambs and stone base. Recommend repairs as part of regular maintenance program.

Single steel bike post N/A

2011 2011

Steel with concrete fill

2011

Metal siding with manufactured stone veneer base

2011

4.1.2 Building Envelope 4.1.2.1

4.1.2.2

$1,000.00

$10,000.00

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Main Entrance Doors - Aluminum

2011

4.1.2.3

Exterior Overhead Doors

Exterior

N/A

Insulated Metal Overhead Doors (x4)

2011

4.1.2.4

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Metal Door from garage, Metal door to patio

2011

Exterior Windows

Exterior

N/A

Vinyl Windows throughout building

4.1.3 Roof

2011

Not Applicable

Not Applicable $0.00

21A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

4.1.2.5

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

293 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

4.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

N/A

Metal Roof

2011

Good - No obvious issues

4.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

2011

Good - No obvious issues

4.1.3.3

Roof Trusses

Inside Roof

N/A

Viewed through hatch upstairs

2011

Good - no signs of deterioration

Interior Walls

Interior

N/A

Gypsum Wallboard

2011

Good - No obvious issues

Class Asset Attribute Class

Manufacturer

Comments/ Identified Need

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Description

Attribute

Asset

4.1.4 Building Interior 4.1.4.1

4.2

$0.00

4.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior

N/A

Metal Doors

2011

Good - No obvious issues

4.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Interior (Garage)

N/A

Exposed concrete

2011

Good/fair - minor cracking

Good/fair

4.1.4.4

Interior Floors

Interior

Vinyl Tile

2011

Localized repairs recommended in men’s bathroom at water closet

4.1.4.5

Interior Ceilings

Interior

Gypsum Wallboard Ceilings/Suspended Acoustic Tile

2011

Good - No obvious issues

N/A

Not Applicable

$2,000.00

HVAC 4.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

$2,000.00

4.2.1.1

Boiler

Utility Room

Lochnivar

Locnivar Knight

2011

4.2.1.2

DHWT & Mixing Valves

Utility Room

Amtrol

Amtrol Boilermate Champion 40 Gal

2011

4.2.1.3

Expansion Tank

Utility Room

Unknown

2011

4.2.1.4

Air Separator

Utility Room

Unknown

2011

4.2.1.5

Unit Heater

Bay #1

Modine

2011

No chemical treatment, could use cleaning

4.2.1.6

Furnace

Utility Room

Lifebreath

Lifebreath Air Handler, 1180 CFM, 1/2 hp, 3 ton

2011

4.2.1.7

Condenser

Exterior

Luxaire

2011

Some motor rust

4.2.1.8

Propane Tank

Exterior

Levac

Levac Propane Inc.

2011

Rented

4.2.2.1

Propane Piping

Exterior

Unknown

2011

Paint Missing

4.2.2.2

Propane PRV’s

Exterior

Unknown

2011

Too close to windows (26"), discharge should be gooseneck to avoid rain entering

4.2.3.1

Main Interior Pump

Bay #1

Heatlink

2011

4.2.3.2

Bay Infloor Pump

Utility Room

Heatlink

2011

4.2.4.1

Wall Exhauster

Bay #1

Unknown

14x14

2011

4.2.4.2

Intake MD

Bay #2

Unknown

2011

4.2.4.3

Prop Fan

Bay #2

Canarm

2011

4.2.6.1

Washroom EF

Male Locker Room

Unknown

2011

4.2.6.2

Washroom EF

Female Locker Room

Unknown

2011

4.2.6.3

Janitor EF

Storage Room

Unknown

2011

CO Detector

Bay #1

Unknown

2011

4.2.2 Natural Gas Piping

$0.00

4.2.4 Garage Ventilation

$0.00

4.2.6 General Exhaust

$0.00

Plumbing

$0.00

4.3.1 Sanitary / Storm

$0.00

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

22A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

4.2.7 HVAC Controls 4.2.7.1

$2,000.00 $0.00

4.2.3 Circulating Pumps

4.3

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

294 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Class

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset 4.3.1.1

Drains

Bay # 1 & 2

Unknown

2011

4.3.1.2

Stormwater Drain

Exterior Bay # 2

Unknown

2011

4.3.2.1

Hose Reel

Bay #1

Unknown

2011

4.3.2.2

Domestic Piping

Utility Room

Unknown

2011

4.3.2.3

Hydronic Piping

Utility Room

Unknown

2011

4.3.2.4

Refrigerant Piping

Exterior

Unknown

2011

4.3.2.5

Boiler Venting

Utility Room

Unknown

636 PVC

2011

4.3.5.1

Eyewash

Bay #1

Guardian

2011

4.3.5.2

Eyewash

Storage Room

Guardian

2011

4.3.2 Piping

$0.00

Some missing insulation

4.3.5 Eyewash Stations

4.4

$0.00

$3,648.00

Electrical 4.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00 5

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

4.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Utility Room

Siemens

200A, 120/240V, 1PH

2011

4.4.1.3

Meter Base

Exterior

Landis+Gyr

Building Meter Base

Unknown

4.4.1.4

Splitter

Utility Room

BEL

BEL B203 225A, 600V, 3W Splitter Box

2011

4.4.1.5

Solar Disconnect Switch

Exterior

Square D

General Duty Safety Switch 60A, 240VAC

2011

4.4.1.6

Solar Panels

Exterior

Microfit

9.88 KW/240 VAC at 40A, Sharp NDL230Q1 Solar Modules

2011

Panel is showing signs of rust.

4.4.1.7

Solar Panel Meter Base

Exterior

Landis+Gyr

Solar Meter Base

Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Unknown Unknown

4.4.2 Distribution System

$3,148.00

4.4.2.1

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of Fluorescent, LED troffer, and pot Light fixtures

2011

4.4.2.2

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Various

Mixture of down lighting and area lighting. Photocell operated.

2011

4.4.2.3

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable.

2011

4.4.2.4

Cable Reel

Exterior

Unknown

Reel mounted cable.

2011

Generally appear to be in fair condition. Some fixtures require repair or replacement. Clean light fixtures as necessary. Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replace bulbs and replace/repair fixtures as required. Conduit and wire observed appeared to be in good condition. Cable reel is damaged and requires replacement.

4.4.3 Emergency Power System

$1,500.00

$1,648.00 $0.00

Generator

Exterior

Generac

QuietSource Series, wireless generator monitoring system

2011

4.4.3.2

Transfer Switches

Utility Room

Generac

Generac RTS Series, Bonded to ground

2011

23A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

4.4.3.1

4.4.4 Fire Alarm System

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Attribute Facility

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Description

Current Age (years)

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life) Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Manufacturer

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

295 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Various

Ceiling mounted Smoke alarms. Receptacle/ wall mounted Carbon Monoxide Alarms.

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Various

Attribute Facility

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

2011

Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration.

Attribute

Asset 4.4.4.1

Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

4.4.5 Emergency Lighting System

$0.00

4.4.5.1

Emergency Lighting

Various

Stanpro

Emergency Battery Units c/w remote lamps

2011

4.4.5.2

Exit Signs

Various

Lumacell

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

2011

8.4.6.1

$0.00 Barrier Free

Main Entrance

Hunter

Barrier Free Access

2011

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. $0.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 4.5.1

$0.00 4.5.1.1

Parking Lot/Lane Way

4.5.1.2

Sidewalk

Main Entrance

Asphalt

Fair - minor to moderate cracking

Concrete

Good/fair - minor cracking

Robertsville Ambulance Base 5.1

$2,200.00 $2,200.00

Architectural & Structural 5.1.1 Building Structure

$0.00

5.1.1.1

Foundation

5.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

5.1.1.3 5.1.1.4 5.1.1.5

Building Structure

Exterior Walls

Below Grade / Full Structure

N/A

Concrete

2013

No obvious issues

Exposed in garage and utility rooms

Good - minor cracking

Interior / Vehicle Bays

N/A

2013

Interior / Vehicle Bays

N/A

2013

Interior / Office Space

N/A

2013

Perimeter of Vehicle Bays, 3 Sides of Office Space

N/A

2013

5.1.1.6

Columns

Entrance Canopy

N/A

Covered with steel flashing

2013

No obvious issues

5.1.1.8

Exterior Pads

Beside / Behind Building

N/A

Equipment pads, patio

2013

Good - no issues

Bollards

Exterior / Between Overhead Doors

N/A

Steel with concrete fill

2013

Good - minor rusting

Good - No obvious issues

Caulking at exterior doors, front entrance columns, window bases and overhead doors showing signs of wear. Recommend replacement as part of general maintenance plan.

5.1.1.9 5.1.2 Building Envelope

$2,200.00

5.1.2.1

Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

Metal siding with manufactured stone veneer base

2013

5.1.2.2

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Main Entrance Doors - Aluminum

2013

Exterior Overhead Door

Exterior/Garage

N/A

Insulated Metal Overhead Doors (x1)

24A

2013

Good - No obvious issues

Acceptable - Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 10 year window.

Good - No obvious issues

Not Applicable

$2,200.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

5.1.2.3

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$500.00

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appear to be in good condition. Replacement in future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

4.4.6 Barrier Free

4.5

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

296 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

5.1.2.4

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Metal Doors (x2)

2013

5.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior

N/A

Vinyl Windows throughout building

2013

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Door Frame Uninsulated at door from Garage. Recommend replacing door with insulated door.

Good - No obvious issues

Staining at facia due to drip edge not functioning. The county may want to consider cleaning of facia as part of regular maintenance for aesthetic appearance.

Good - No obvious issues

Good - Generally no obvious issues

Recommended drywall repair above exterior metal door to out door patio. Drywall showing signs of moisture damage. Cause unknown.

Attribute

Asset

5.1.3 Roof

5.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

Exterior

N/A

Metal Roofing

2013

5.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

Exterior

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

2013

5.1.4.1

Not Applicable

$0.00

Interior Walls

Interior / Various

N/A

Gypsum Wallboard

5.1.4.2

Interior Doors

5.1.4.3

Interior Floors

5.1.4.4

Interior Ceilings

2013

Interior / Various

N/A

Wood Doors with Metal Frames

2013

Good - No obvious issues

Interior / Various

N/A

Ceramic Tile throughout

2013

Good - No obvious issues

Interior / Various

N/A

Gypsum Wallboard Ceilings/Suspended Acoustic Tile

2013

Good - No obvious issues

Not Applicable

$0.00

HVAC 5.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

$0.00

5.2.1.1

AC Unit

Crew Area

Mitsubishi

Mr. Slim Series c/w Cond Pump

5.2.1.2 5.2.1.3

Indirect Fired WH

Utility Room

Triangle Tube

Triangle Tube Smart 50

Expansion Tank

Utility Room

Pro Flex

Pro Flex 2 HTX-30

5.2.1.4

Boiler

Utility Room

Triangle Tube

Triangle Tube Challenger

5.2.1.5

HRV

Crew Area

Venmar

5.2.2.1

Propane Piping

Exterior

5.2.2.2

Propane Tank

2014

Venmar 41500

2014

Unknown

2014

Exterior

Unknown

2014

WH Pump

Utility Room

Grundfos

2014

5.2.3.2

Boiler Pump

Utility Room

Grundfos

2014

5.2.3.3

In-Floor Pump

Utility Room

Grundfos

2014

Condenser coils need cleaning

5.2.2 Natural Gas Piping

$0.00

5.2.3 Circulating Pumps 5.2.3.1

Piping not protected, paint patching $0.00

5.2.4 Garage Ventilation

$0.00 Exterior Garage

Unknown

2014

5.2.4.2

Ceiling Prop Fan

Garage

Unknown

2014

5.2.6.1

O/A Opening & Actuator

Garage

Tamco

2014

5.2.6.2

Ceiling EF

Men’s Washroom

Unknown

2014

5.2.6.2

Ceiling EF

Women’s Washroom

Unknown

2014

$0.00

25A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

5.2.4.1

Upblast Fan (Wall) & Actuator

5.2.6 General Exhaust

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Not Applicable

$0.00

5.1.4 Building Interior

5.2

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Condition Rating

Asset Hierarchy

Location

297 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Garage

QEL

2014

AC Unit T-Stat

Garage

Mitsubishi

2014

Floor T-Stat

Garage

Tekman

2014

5.2.7.4

Taco Controller

Utility Room

Taco

Taco Valve Controller

2014

5.2.7.5

Chemical Treatment

Utility Room

Unknown

2014

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

5.2.7 HVAC Controls

5.3

$0.00

5.2.7.1

CO2 Sensor

5.2.7.2 5.2.7.3

$0.00

Plumbing 5.3.1 Sanitary Exhaust

$0.00

5.3.1.1

Garage Drains

Garage

Unknown

2014

Standing Water, Odours

5.3.2 Domestic Hot / Cold water

$0.00

5.3.2.1

Reverse Osmosis Filter

Kitchen

Reverse Osmosis

Reverse Osmosis RO-132

2014

5.3.2.2

Hose Reel

Garage

Unknown

2014

Well Tank & Pump

Utility Room

Well-Rite

Well-Rite 33 Gal Tank

2014

5.3.4.1

Washroom Fixtures

Men’s & Women’s Washroom

5.3.4.2

U/V Filter & Softener

Utility Room

5.3.5.1

Infloor Piping

Utility Room

5.3.3 Sump Pumps

$0.00

5.3.3.1 5.3.4 Fixtures

$0.00 Unknown

Unknown

2014

Viqua

2014

Unknown

2014

5.3.5 Piping 5.4

$0.00 Unknown

Leaks & Corrosion noticed on pipes $0.00

Electrical (includes generator) 5.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00

5.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Utility Room

Eaton

100A, 120/240V, 1PH

2013

5.4.1.2

Transformers

Pole Mounted

Unknown

Utility owned pole mounted transformer.

Unknown

5.4.1.3

Meter Base

Exterior

Landis+Gyr

Building Meter Base

Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

5.4.2 Distribution System

$0.00

5.4.2.1

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of Fluorescent, LED, and pot Light fixtures

2013

5.4.2.2

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Various

Mixture of down lighting and area lighting. Photocell operated.

2013

5.4.2.3

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable. Varying age of Conduit and Wiring.

2013

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Conduit and wire observed appeared to be in good condition. $0.00

5.4.3.1

Generator

Exterior

Honeywell

Honeywell Home Generator

2013

5.4.3.2

Transfer Switches

Utility Room

Generac

Generac RTS Series, Bonded to ground

2013

26A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

5.4.3 Emergency Power System

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

298 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Various

Ceiling/wall mounted Smoke alarms.

2013

Condition Rating

Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Various

Attribute Facility

Current Age (years)

Asset

Description

Life Expectancy (years)

Class

Manufacturer

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration.

Generally appear to be in good condition. Replacement in future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

Attribute

Asset

5.4.4 Fire Alarm System 5.4.4.1

$0.00 Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

5.4.5 Emergency Lighting System 5.4.5.1 5.5

Exit Signs/ Emergency Lighting

$0.00 Various

Stanpro

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination & Emergency Lamp Heads

2013

$0.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 5.5.1

$0.00 5.5.1.1

Parking lot, lane way

Front of Building

Asphalt

Good - no issues

Wolfe Island Ambulance Base 6.1

$8,350.00 $2,250.00

Architectural & Structural 6.1.1 Building Structure

$0.00

6.1.1.1

Foundation

Below Grade / Full Structure

6.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

Utility Room

6.1.1.3

Building Structure

Structural Framing

6.1.1.4

Exterior Walls

6.1.1.5

Columns

6.1.1.6

Windows

Canopy Framing

2011

Mostly not observable - good condition

Only visible in utility room

2011

Fair condition

Wood studs

2011

Generally good condition (observed through 1 ceiling tile)

Good condition

Generally good condition

Door and window penetrations require counter flashing at jambs where siding meets windows and doors (all). Currently siding does not provide full coverage around these openings. Flashing details at window and doors headers to be corrected to allow for positive drainage of rain water.

N/A

2011

N/A

2011

52 52

N/A

2011

6.1.2 Building Envelope

$2,250.00

6.1.2.1

Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

Metal cladding, Wood frame construction

2011

6.1.2.2

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Metal Door - main entrance door

2011

Generally Good - Minor damage noted at threshold of main doors (general maintenance).

6.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior

N/A

Vinyl Windows Throughout Building

2011

Generally good condition.

6.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

N/A

Metal standing seam roofing, wood frame construction

2011

Generally Good - Some fading of color apparent

6.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

2011

Good - No obvious concerns

6.1.3 Roof

$2,250.00

$0.00

6.1.4 Building Interior

$0.00 Interior Walls

Interior

N/A

Gypsum Wall Board

2011

22 2

6.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior

N/A

Wood Doors, Metal Frames

27A

2011

Good Condition - Showing surface wear from day to day use. Recommend budgeting for interior painting as part of general maintenance

Good

Not Applicable

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

5 6.1.4.1

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

299 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

6.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Interior

N/A

Vinyl Tile Throughout

2011

6.1.4.4

Interior Ceilings

Interior

N/A

Suspended Acoustical Tile

2011

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

6.2

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Localized delamination of tile at north bedroom along north wall potentially due to moisture at slab. Localized repairs recommended.

Generally Fair Condition

Attribute

Asset

$0.00

6.2.1.1

Furnace

Furnace Room

Luxaire

Luxair TG9s040A08MP11A

2011

6.2.1.2

DHWT

Furnace Room

Space Saver

Space Saver Model SS30LSEB

2011

6.2.1.3

Condenser

Exterior

Luxaire

Luxaire Model TCGD18S$41S3A

2011

6.2.1.6

Thermostat

Kitchen

Honeywell

Honeywell T-Stat

2011

Propane Tanks

Exterior

Levac

Levac Propane Inc.

2011

Exhaust Fan

Water Closet

Unknown

2011

Some rust inside from leaks, Heating & Cooling both work. Furnace vents missing birdscreens, No service logs. Insulation showing signs of weather damage, will deteriorate. coils clean, some signs of motor rust

6.2.2 Natural Gas Piping 6.2.2.1

$0.00

6.2.4 Ventilation 6.2.2.1

$0.00

6.2.2.2

Exhaust Fan

Kitchen

Unknown

2011

6.2.2.3

Supply Diffuser

Various

Unknown

2011

Diffuser’s could be cleaned $0.00

Plumbing 6.3.1 Sanitary Exhaust 6.3.1.1

$0.00 Sanitary Piping

Kitchen

Unknown

2011

6.3.2 Domestic Hot / Cold water

6.4

$0.00

6.3.2.1

DHW Piping

Furnace Room

Unknown

2011

Uninsulated Piping

6.3.2.2

DCW Piping

Furnace Room

Unknown

2011

Uninsulated Piping $1,100.00

Electrical (includes generator) 6.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00

6.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Utility Room

Siemens

100A, 120/240V

2011

6.4.1.2

Meter Base

Exterior

Landis+Gyr

Building Meter Base

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. It is recommended to relocated shelf housing communications equipment.

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

6.4.2 Distribution System

$500.00

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of ceiling mounted fixtures and pot lights, LED bulbs

5 2011

22 1

6.4.2.2

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Unknown

LED Area lighting.

2011

6.4.2.3

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable.

2011

28A

Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Faulty Bathroom and Bedroom Light Switches to be replaced. Generally appears to be in good condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. Conduit and wire observed appeared to be in good condition.

$500.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

6.4.2.1

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

Not Applicable

$0.00

HVAC 6.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

6.3

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Identification

Condition Rating

Asset Hierarchy

Location

300 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Class

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

6.4.3 Emergency Power System

$0.00

6.4.3.1

Generator

Exterior

Generac

Guardian Series, 10kW, 240V 45A Generator Disconnect, Wireless Generator Monitoring System

2011

6.4.3.2

Transfer Switches

Exterior

Generac

Generac RTS Series, Bonded to ground

2011

6.4.4 Fire Alarm System 6.4.4.1

$0.00 Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Various

Kidde

Ceiling mounted smoke alarm.

2011

Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration.

Generally appears to be in fair condition. These units shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

An exit sign is in poor condition and could use replacement. Other exit signs appear to be in fair condition. Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage.

6.4.5 Emergency Lighting System 6.4.5.1

6.4.5.2

6.5

Emergency Lighting

Exit Signs

$600.00 Various

Various

Lumacell

Emergency Battery Units c/w remote lamps

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

2011

$5,000.00 6.5.1.1

Parking / Lane Way

Front of Buildings

Asphalt

Good - no observable deterioration

6.5.1.2

Sidewalk

Along Front and Side of Building

Concrete

Acceptable - moderate cracking, some settlement, rough finish along building edge. Should continue to be monitored.

6.5.1.3

Heli Pad

East of Buildings

Asphalt

Poor - major cracking, not level, overgrown with grass, paint barely visible

Parham Ambulance Base

$5,000.00

$31,200.00 $18,500.00

Architectural & Structural 7.1.1 Building Structure

$4,000.00

7.1.1.1

Foundation

7.1.4.6

Foundation

7.1.1.2

Slab on Grade

7.1.1.3

Building Structure

7.1.4.3 7.1.4.4

Parging over concrete block

1981

Concrete block walls

1981

Concrete

1981

Wood Framing

1981

Main Floor

Main floor structure viewed from basement - Wood floor joists

Basement

Vehicle Bays N/A

Some cracking in parging Poor - leaking in multiple locations, being repaired at time of site visit Generally fair - moderate cracking and delamination that has previously been repaired, localized poor condition at joint between SOG and apron slab

Generally acceptable

1981

Generally fair condition with minor wear. Joist at post by stairs is failing - Poor condition

Basement slab-on-grade

1981

Acceptable - moderate wear

7.1.2.1

Vinyl siding

2003

Good - No obvious issues

$2,000.00

$13,500.00 Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

29A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Interior Floors

Above and Below Grade, Building Perimeter

7.1.2 Building Envelope

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$600.00

$5,000.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 6.5.1

7.1

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Attribute Facility

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Description

Current Age (years)

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life) Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Manufacturer

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

301 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Asset Hierarchy

Identification

Exterior Doors

Exterior (Garage)

N/A

Metal Door (x1)

2003

Fair - No Obvious Issues

$8,000.00

Attribute

Asset

7.1.2.2

7.1.2.3

Exterior Overhead Doors

Exterior

N/A

Insulated Metal Overhead Doors (x3)

2003

7.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior (Garage and main station areas)

N/A

Vinyl frame, Wood frame

2003

Fair Condition - Recommend budgeting for replacement within 10 years based on age

$2,000.00

7.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior - 1994 addition (Crew Room)

N/A

Vinyl Casement and Horizontal Slider

1994

Acceptable - Recommend budgeting for replacement within 5 years based on age.

$1,000.00 $0.00

7.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

Exterior

N/A

Shingles

2016

Fair - no obvious issues with shingle roofing. Some warping of structure noted.

7.1.3.2

Soffit & Fascia

Exterior

N/A

Perforated Aluminum Soffits, Aluminum Fascia

2001

Fair - No obvious issues - minor localized repairs recommended as part of regular maintenance.

Interior Walls

Interior - Main Floor

N/A

Gypsum Wall Board

1981

Good - No obvious issues

7.1.4 Building Interior 7.1.4.1

Interior Walls

Interior - Garage

N/A

Metal cladding and CMU Base

1981

Good - No obvious issues

7.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior - Main Floor

N/A

Hollow core wood

1981

Generally Good

Fair - Generally no obvious issues except

Grout failing at tile throughout hallway. Recommend repairing grout or replacing tile through hallway.

Good - No major issues

7.1.4.5

Not Applicable $1,000.00

7.1.4.1

7.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Interior Ceilings

Interior - Main Floor

N/A

Ceramic tile, various installations

Gypsum Wall Board

2003

1981

$1,000.00

$200.00

HVAC 7.2.1 Heating & Cooling.

$0.00

7.2.1.1

Oil Tank

Furnace Room

Vilco

Vilco 909 L Oil Tank

2011

7.2.1.2

Oil Furnace

Furnace Room

Unknown

OHB5-F097-130-5/BHF-4

2011

7.2.1.3

Oil Furnace Venting

Furnace Room

Unknown

Galvanized

2011

7.2.1.4

Chimney

Exterior

Unknown

Galvanized

2011

7.2.1.5

Furnace Thermostat

Garage

Unknown

2011

7.2.1.6

Basement Oil Furnace

Basement

Unknown

OLB5-F059-085-3/BLF-5

2011

7.2.1.7

HRV

Basement

VanEE

VanEE Model 1601606

2011

7.2.1.8

Refrigerant Piping

Basement

Unknown

2011

7.2.1.9

Basement Furnace Venting

Basement

Unknown

2011

30A

No containment Some rust, holes to be plugged, Combustion makeup is flex duct

Filter plugged, needs cleaning

Combustion air ductwork is flexible duct

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$2,500.00

Acceptable - moderate rusting at track bases. Noted that ongoing maintenance required due to frequency of use. Replacement should be budgeted for within 5 year window.

7.1.3 Roof

7.2

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Condition Rating

Effective Life Remaining (years)

2003

Current Age (years)

Metal Clad Wood (x2),

Life Expectancy (years)

N/A

Attribute Class

Description

Year of Installation

Exterior

Asset

Manufacturer

Exterior Doors

Fair - No Obvious Issues with doors themselves - Recommend replacement of hardware and hinges as they are showing wear - The County may consider replacement of doors for performance.

Class

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Facility

Location

302 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Identification Manufacturer

Description

Year of Installation

Life Expectancy (years)

Current Age (years)

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Condition Rating

Chimney

Exterior

Unknown

2011

Generator Gas Piping

Exterior

Unknown

2011

7.2.4.1

Prop Ceiling Fan

Garage

Unknown

2011

7.2.4.2

Prop Ceiling Fan

Garage

Unknown

2011

7.2.4.3

Prop Ceiling Fan

Garage

Unknown

2011

7.2.4.4

Wall Exhauster

Garage

Unknown

2011

No makeup air

7.2.4.5

Industrial Air Cleaner

Garage

Unknown

2011

Decommissioned

7.2.4.6

Garage Ductwork

Garage

Unknown

2011

2 ducts into old garage have no grilles

7.2.4.7

Garage Furnace Ductwork

Garage

Unknown

2011

Return grille to furnace should be replaced

Facility Class Asset Attribute Facility

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset 7.2.1.10

7.2.2 Natural Gas Piping 7.2.2.1

$0.00 Natural gas piping showing signs of rust.

7.2.4 Garage Ventilation

7.3

$200.00

Wobbly, needs tightening

$0.00

7.3.1.1

Garage Drainage

Garage

Unknown

2011

Garage

Unknown

2011

5 5

Drains backup

7.3.2 Domestic Hot / Cold water 7.3.2.1

$0.00 Hose Reel

7.3.2.2

R0 System

Kitchen

TankPro

TankPro R0 System

2011

7.3.2.3

Copper Piping

Various

Unknown

2011

7.3.2.4

Soft water, UV & Filter

Basement

Viqua

Soft Water, UV & Filter System

2011

7.3.2.5

Basement Oil Fired Water Heater

Basement

Brock

Brock CWD32-I

2011

7.3.3.1

Sump Pump

Basement

Unknown

Rigid

2011

7.3.2.2

Sump Pump Piping

Basement

Unknown

2011

Pressure Tank & Pump

Basement Furnace

Unknown

2011

Needs insulation

Replace relief valve

7.3.3 Sump Pumps

$0.00 Leaking flex, should be rigid

7.3.5 Pressure Tank 7.3.5.1

$0.00 Unknown

$12,500.00

Electrical (includes generator) 7.4.1 Incoming Services

$5,000.00

7.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Basement

Square D

200A, 120/240V, 1PH

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Showing some signs of wear. Replace in 510 years based on condition rating.

7.4.1.2

Meter Base

Exterior

Unknown

Building Meter Base

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

7.4.1.3

Transformers

Pole Mounted

Unknown

Utility owned pole mounted transformer.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

7.4.2 Distribution System 7.4.2.1

$5,000.00

$7,500.00 Panelboards

Utility Room

Square D

100A, 120/240V 1PH sub panel

31A

2003

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$200.00 $0.00

Plumbing 7.3.1 Sanitary Exhaust

7.4

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Asset Hierarchy

Location

303 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Class

Comments/ Identified Need

Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating. Replace bulbs as required. Clean insects from fixtures as necessary. Cracked switch cover in basement should be replaced. Light above sink requires replacement.

$1,500.00

Garage Lighting appears to be in fair condition. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary. All old braided wiring should be considered for replacement within 5 years based on condition rating. Old generator hook-up in the garage should be removed. Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$5,000.00

Attribute

Asset

7.4.2.2

Interior Lighting

Various

Mixture of Fluorescent, LED, and Incandescent fixtures

Various

4 7.4.2.3

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Various

Mixture of

Various

7.4.2.4

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable. Varying age of Conduit and Wiring.

Various

3 3

7.4.2.4

A/C Disconnect

Exterior

Unknown

Non-Fused Disconnect

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

7.4.3 Emergency Power System Generator

Exterior

Generac

Generac Guardian Series, 17kW, 120/208V

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

7.4.3.2

Transfer Switches

Basement

Generac

Generac RTS Series, Bonded to ground

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

$0.00 Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Various

Ceiling mounted Smoke alarms.

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally in good condition. Replace on or before unit expiration date.

7.4.5 Emergency Lighting System

$0.00

7.4.5.1

Emergency Lighting

Various

Lumacell

Emergency Battery Units c/w remote lamps

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

7.4.5.2

Exit Signs

Various

Emergi-Lite

Exit Signs c/w Internal Illumination

Unknown

Unknown Unknown

Generally appears to be in good condition. Replace in 10 years based on condition rating Generally appear to be in fair condition. Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to green “Running Man” signage. $0.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways 7.5.1

$0.00 7.5.1.1

Lane Way

Front of Building

Asphalt

Fair - minor to moderate cracking

Fairmount Home - Paramedic Offices 8.1

$34,306.80 $34,306.80

Architectural & Structural

8.1.1.1

$34,306.80 Interior Floors

Basement Floor / Paramedic Offices

N/A

Carpet Flooring

2004

Poor condition - Recommend replacement due to age

$34,306.80 $0.00

HVAC 8.2.1 Building Interior

$0.00

8.2.1.1

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

32A

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

8.1.1 Building Interior

8.2

$500.00 $0.00

7.4.3.1

7.4.4.1

$500.00

Generally appears to be in fair condition. Generator was not connected due to building renovation. Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

7.4.4 Fire Alarm System

7.5

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Condition Rating

Attribute Facility

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Description

Current Age (years)

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life) Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Manufacturer

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

304 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Class

Condition Rating

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

Howe Island Ferry Building 9.1

$17,100.00 $7,800.00

Architectural & Structural 9.1.1 Building Structure

$0.00

9.1.1.1

Foundation

Above and Below Grade, Building Perimeter

9.1.1.2

Building Structure

Envelope

Concrete

2006

Fair - minor wear, some areas with moderate wear

Wood studs

2006

Not observable - no obvious issues

Generally Good - Some wear apparent

Caulking at vertical joint of base flashing failing. Recommend repairing.

9.1.2 Building Envelope

$2,500.00

9.1.2.1

Exterior Walls

Exterior

N/A

Metal Panel Siding

2006

9.1.2.2

Exterior Doors

Exterior

N/A

Metal Clad Wood (x2)

2006

Generally Good - Some wear apparent

9.1.2.5

Exterior Windows

Exterior

N/A

Vinyl Windows

2006

Poor - Windows seals beginning to fail. Recommend replacement within 5 years.

9.1.3 Roof 9.1.3.1

Roof Assembly

Exterior

N/A

Metal Panel

2006

9.1.3.2

Fascia

Exterior

N/A

Metal Facia

2006

Good - No Obvious Issues

Interior Walls

Interior

N/A

Finished panels throughout

2006

2 1

9.1.4.2

Interior Doors

Interior (Washroom)

9.1.4.3

Interior Floors

Interior

9.1.4.4

Interior Ceilings

Interior

N/A

Fair Condition. General cleaning recommended as part of regular maintenance. Door casing at exterior doors showing staining and water damage. Recommend painting/replacement Good functional condition though showing surface wear. Recommend painting for aesthetic reasons.

Not Applicable

Metal Door with Metal Frame

2006

Vinyl Plank

2006

Generally Good Condition. Damage at main door (likely due to moisture) to be repaired, temporary patch in now. Recommend replacement of flooring.

$3,500.00

Generally fair condition. Showing minor rust around perimeter. Showing moderate rusting of support grid in bathroom. Recommend budgeting for Replacement within 5 years

$1,800.00

Suspended Acoustical Tile

2006

$800.00

HVAC 9.2.1

$800.00 9.2.1.1

Unit Ventilator

Office

Bard

Bard Serial # 139F062188607-02

2011

R-22 Refrigerant, Elec heating coil, DX cooling coil

Thermostat

Office

Bard

Bard T-Stat

2011

9.2.1.3

Sump Level Alarm

Washroom

Sump Guard

Sumpguard Model P-500

2011

Used for septic holding tank

$500.00

9.2.1.4

Electric Radiator

Washroom

Unknown

2011

Some surface rust, should be painted

$300.00 $0.00

9.3.1

$0.00 9.3.1.1

Sink

Kitchen

Unknown

33A

2011

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

9.2.1.2

Plumbing

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$2,500.00

$5,300.00 4

9.1.4.1

9.3

Not Applicable

$0.00 Difficult to view. No issues of leaking reported. Condition assumed to be Good per Age

9.1.4 Building Interior

9.2

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Attribute Facility

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Asset

Description

Current Age (years)

Class

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life) Life Expectancy (years)

Facility

Manufacturer

Identification

Year of Installation

Asset Hierarchy

Location

305 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

Rheem

Rheemglas Fury Model # RE2

2011

Exterior

Unknown

2011

Downspout should be extended

9.3.1.4

Lav

Washroom

Unknown

2011

Some rust stains, rusted. Washroom metal is rusting, could look at increasing ventilation

9.4

Comments/ Identified Need

Attribute

Asset

$6,500.00

Electrical (includes generator) 9.4.1 Incoming Services

$0.00 5

Generally appears to be in good condition. This unit shall be monitored, evaluated and replaced as necessary.

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Appears to be Utility Owned.

Unknown Unknown

N/A

Understood to be MTO Owned.

9.4.1.1

Main Panelboard / Disconnect Switch

Office

Siemens

100A, 120/240V

2006

9.4.1.2

Transformers

Pole Mounted

Unknown

Utility owned pole mounted transformer.

Unknown

8.4.1.3

Meter Base

Exterior

Landis+Gyr

9.4.1.4

Electrical Cabinet

Exterior

Unknown

Pole mounted meter base, locked in cabinet. Appears Unknown to be utility owned. Stainless Steel Electrical Enclosure. Appears to be MTO owned. Appears to feed How Island Ferry Unknown Building.

9.4.2 Distribution System

$3,500.00

8.4.2.1

Interior Lighting

Interior

Unknown

Fluorescent 1x4 surface mounted strip lighting,

2006

9.4.2.2

Exterior Lighting

Exterior

Unknown

Wall mounted area light, photo-cell operated

2006

9.4.2.3

Conduit and Wiring

Various

Mixture of conduit, wire and cable. Varying age of Conduit and Wiring.

2006

5 2

Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Replace within 5 years based on condition rating. Clean insects and replace bulbs/lens as required. Replacement of Wall Pack within 5 years based on condition rating Observed cable and wiring appears to be in good condition. Conduit for service connection is heavily rusted. It is recommended to replace this conduit.

9.4.3 Emergency Lighting System 9.4.3.1

Exit Signs

$250.00

$2,500.00 $0.00

Interior

Unknown

Non-illuminated, wall mounted, plastic exit sign

2006

Replace within 10 years based on condition rating.

$500.00

Showing some signs of wear but appear operational. Exposed wire at the tank should be replaced and mechanically protected. Replace within 5 years based on condition rating

$2,500.00

$3,000.00 9.4.4.2

9.4.4.3

Base Board Heating

Sump Pump Alarm

Washroom

Various

Unknown

MPC

Electric Baseboard Heater

Liquid Level Alarm System

2006

$2,000.00

Parking Lots/Lane Ways

$2,000.00 9.5.1.1

Parking

Front of Building

Asphalt

Fair - minor cracking

9.5.1.2 9.5.1.3

Guiderail

North of Building

Steel with wooden posts

Acceptable - minor damage on North end

Bollards

Around Electrical Panel/Equipment

Fair - minor wear, rust

34A

$2,000.00

September 2019

AGENDA ITEM #a)

9.5.1

J.L. Richards Associates Limited JLR No. 28833-000.1

$750.00

Plastic exit sign is in good condition. Replacement in the future will be to upgrade to illuminated green “Running Man” signage.

9.4.4 Misc.

9.5

Estimated Repair or Replacement Cost

Under Kitchen Sink

Rainwater Downspout

Attribute Class

Effective Life Remaining (years)

Electric DHWT

9.3.1.3

Asset

Current Age (years)

9.3.1.2

Class

Year of Installation

Manufacturer

Description

Facility

Valuation

Sustainability Data (Asset Life)

Condition Rating

Identification

Life Expectancy (years)

Asset Hierarchy

Location

306 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

County of Frontenac - Facility Condition Assessment Appendix A - Asset Inventory Tables

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 4.0

FAIRMOUNT HOME CONDITION ASSESSMENT

4.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 4.2.1: Foundation wall deterioration at the garbage loading bays.

Photo 4.2.2: Foundation wall deterioration and rusting of reinforcing steel at auditorium wall.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

1B -

307 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

. Photo 4.2.3: Staining and deterioration of masonry at Green house.

Photo 4.2.4: Staining and deterioration of masonry at Green house.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

2B -

308 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.5: Exterior Brick of the 2004 Addition

Photo 4.2.6: Exterior Brick of the 2004 Addition

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

3B -

309 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.7: Ground floor vinyl window

Photo 4.2.8: Second floor vinyl window

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

4B -

310 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.9: Full Height Wood Windows at South Stairwell S2.

Photo 4.2.10: Full Height Wood Windows at South Stairwell S2 – view from interior.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

5B -

311 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.11: Full Height Wood Windows at South Stairwell S2 – painted frame.

Photo 4.2.12: Metal Shingles at Mansard of 1968 wing.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

6B -

312 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.13: Asphalt shingles at Mansard of 2004 wing.

Photo 4.2.14: Dormers at 2004 wing

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

7B -

313 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.15: Dormers at 2004 wing: cupping and degranulation

Photo 4.2.16: Sloped roof over central portion of East wing.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

8B -

314 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.2.17: 2-ply mod bit roofing at 1968 wing.

Photo 4.2.18: Example of localized “bubbling” of 2-ply mod bit roofing at 1968 wing.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

9B -

315 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

4.3

HVAC

Photo 4.3.1 - Fairmount Mechanical Room Steam Boiler # 2

Photo 4.3.2 - Fairmount RTU-4

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

10B -

316 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.3.3 – Fairmount RTU-4A

Photo 4.3.4 - Fairmount RTU-6

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

11B -

317 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.3.5 - Fairmount rooftop open p-traps

Photo 4.3.6 - Fairmount Kitchen Exhaust fan

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

12B -

318 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.3.7 - Fairmount rooftop natural gas valve

Photo 4.3.8 - Fairmount Auditorium Multizone air handling unit

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

13B -

319 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.3.9 - Fairmount Rooftop Dirty Condenser fins

Photo 4.3.10 - Fairmount Fridge/Freezer/Garbage Room Condensers

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

14B -

320 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

4.4

Plumbing

Photo 4.4.1 - Fairmount Mechanical Room Soft Water and Treatment System

Photo 4.4.2 - Fairmount Mechanical Room 60° Boiler

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

15B -

321 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.4.3 - Fairmount Mechanical Room Hydronic Pump

Photo 4.4.4 - Fairmount uninsulated sweating pipes in mechanical room

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

16B -

322 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.4.5 - Fairmount domestic hot water recirculation pump leak

4.5

Electrical

Photo 4.5.1: Fairmount 1000KVA Transformer.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

17B -

323 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.5.2: Fairmount Main Switchboard, Switchboard AAA.

Photo 4.5.3: Fairmount 250kW Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

18B -

324 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.5.4: Typical Fairmount Electrical Closet 600-120/208V Transformer.

Photo 4.5.5: Typical Fairmount Electrical Closet Panelboards.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

19B -

325 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.5.6: Fairmount Rooftop Solar Array.

Photo 4.5.7: 15A Rooftop Receptacle to be Replaced With 20A Receptacle.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

20B -

326 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 4.5.8: Receptacle To Be Replace With GFCI Receptacle.

Photo 4.5.9: Boxes Requiring Covers.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

21B -

327 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

4.6

Life Safety

Photo 4.7.1: Localized concrete cracking and delamination of sidewalks.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

22B -

328 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 5.0

ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT

5.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 5.2.1: Foundation wall deterioration.

Photo 5.2.2: Foundation wall deterioration.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

23B -

329 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.3: Deteriorated concrete pier supporting steel column.

Photo 5.2.4: Existing roof guardrail system that does not meet building code requirements.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

24B -

330 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.5: Concrete spalling and rebar corrosion at lintel over window frame.

Photo 5.2.6: Mortar erosion at the masonry pillar pedestals at the front building entrance.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

25B -

331 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.7: Deteriorated landing pad on east side of building.

Photo 5.2.8: The West exterior door from the Boardroom

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

26B -

332 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.9: The West exterior door from the Boardroom: sidelights and transom windows show signs of failing window seals

Photo 5.2.10: The North residential style entrance door with sidelight and transom windows

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

27B -

333 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.11: exterior wood door on east elevation

Photo 5.2.12: Exterior windows at boardroom

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

28B -

334 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.13: Exterior windows at boardroom: Interior water damage

Photo 5.2.14: Exterior windows at boardroom: Failed Cauking

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

29B -

335 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.2.15: Exterior windows at boardroom: Failed cauking at sill

Photo 5.2.16: Localized water damage at ceiling in the ground floor East office

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

30B -

336 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

5.3

HVAC

Photo 5.3.1 - Fairmount Old House Uninsulated pipe riser

Photo 5.3.2 Fairmount Old House Air Compressor

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

31B -

337 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.3.3 - Fairmount Old House Attic Fan Coil Unit

Photo 5.3.4 - Fairmount Old House Rooftop Condenser Unit

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

32B -

338 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

5.4

Electrical

Photo 5.5.1: Old House Electrical Distribution System.

Photo 5.5.2: Old House Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

33B -

339 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.5.3: Damaged Cable Chase.

Photo 5.5.4: Damaged Flex Conduit.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

34B -

340 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 5.5.5: Receptacle On Circuit With Air Conditioner.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

35B -

341 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 6.0

PALACE ROAD AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT

6.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 6.2.1: Deteriorated concrete foundation wall at location of asphalt cavity.

Photo: 6.2.2: Rusting on column flashing at overhead doors.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

36B -

342 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.2.3: Roof guardrail with missing anchor bolts.

Photo 6.2.4: Weld on the roof access ladder bracing has let go.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

37B -

343 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.2.5: South Elevation

Photo 6.2.6: South Façade - deteriorating mortar joints at west end.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

38B -

344 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.2.7: South Façade - deteriorating mortar joints at east end.

Photo 6.2.8: South East Window with deteriorating mortar joints.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

39B -

345 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.2.9: South East Window deteriorating mortar joints.

Photo 6.2.10: Corridor entrance at West end.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

40B -

346 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.2.11: Flat roofing on South side of building.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

41B -

347 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

6.3

HVAC

Photo 6.3.1 - Palace Road Ambulance Base Rooftop Unit

Photo 6.3.2 - Palace Road Ambulance Base Radiant Heaters

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

42B -

348 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

6.4

Plumbing

Photo 6.4.1 - Palace Road Ambulance Base Water Entry BFP & Expansion Tank

Photo 6.4.2 - Palace Road Ambulance Base Domestic Water Heater

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

43B -

349 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

6.5

Electrical

Photo 6.5.1: Palace Road Ambulance Base Main Disconnect and Panelboard.

Photo 6.5.2: Palace Road Ambulance Base Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

44B -

350 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.5.3: Service Conduit Requiring Strapping.

Photo 6.5.4: Palace Road Ambulance Base Solar Array.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

45B -

351 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 6.5.5: Light Fixtures Requiring Maintenance Or Cleaning.

Photo 6.5.6: Receptacle Missing While-in-use Cover.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

46B -

352 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 7.0

SYDENHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT

7.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 7.2.1: Rusted bike rack.

Photo 7.2.2: Exterior metal roofing, metal panel siding, and masonry base.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

47B -

353 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 7.2.3: Example of gap between window jambs and masonry base (typical).

Photo 7.2.4: Main entrance doors.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

48B -

354 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 7.2.5: Failed mortar at base of main entrance door sidelights.

Photo 7.2.6: Exterior metal door at garage showing rusting

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

49B -

355 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

7.3

HVAC

Photo 7.3.1 - Sydenham Ambulance Base Hot Water Boiler

Photo 7.3.2 - Sydenham Ambulance Base Garage Unit Heater

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

50B -

356 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 7.3.3 - Sydenham Ambulance Base Condenser Unit

7.4

Plumbing

Photo 7.4.1 - Sydenham Ambulance Base Propane Tank

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

51B -

357 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

7.5

Electrical

Photo 7.5.1: Sydenham Ambulance Base Main Panelboard.

Photo 7.5.2: Sydenham Ambulance Base Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

52B -

358 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 7.5.3: Sydenham Ambulance Base Solar Array.

Photo 7.5.4: Sydenham Solar Array Panel.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

53B -

359 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 7.5.5: Damaged Cable Reel.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

54B -

360 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 8.0

ROBERTSVILLE AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT

8.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 8.2.1: Localized staining at garage facia overhanging lower roof

Photo 8.2.2: Close up of Localized Staining from East side of building. Similar staining also visible from west side (not shown

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

55B -

361 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

) Photo 8.2.3: Caulking at garage doors has gaps to be filled.

Photo 8.2.4: Caulking at porch column bases showing deterioration.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

56B -

362 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 8.2.5: localized water damage above exterior metal door to patio..

8.3

HVAC

Photo 8.3.1 - Robertsville Ambulance Base Well Tank

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

57B -

363 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 8.3.2 - Robertsville Ambulance Base Hot Water Tank

Photo 8.3.3 - Robertsville Ambulance Base Condenser Unit

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

58B -

364 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

8.4

Plumbing

Photo 8.4.1 - Robertsville Ambulance Base HRV

8.5

Electrical

Photo 8.5.1: Robertsville Ambulance Base Main Panelboard.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

59B -

365 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 8.5.2: Robertsville Ambulance Base Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

60B -

366 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 9.0

WOLFE ISLAND AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT

9.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 9.2.1: Building Exterior Metal Roof and Panel Siding

Photo 9.2.2: Typical window. No positive drainage at top.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

61B -

367 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 9.2.3: Typical gap between metal siding and window opening.

Photo 9.2.4: General wear of interior walls

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

62B -

368 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 9.2.5: Delamination of vinyl tile at North Bedroom

9.3

HVAC

Photo 9.4.1 – Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Furnace

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

63B -

369 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 9.4.2 – Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Condenser Unit Piping Insulation

9.5

Electrical

Photo 9.5.1: Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Main Panelboard.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

64B -

370 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 9.5.2: Wolfe Island Ambulance Base Standby Generator.

9.6

Parking Lots / Lane Ways

Photo 9.6.1: Cracking in concrete sidewalk.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

65B -

371 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo: 9.6.2: Existing helicopter landing pad.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

66B -

372 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 10.0 PARHAM AMBULANCE BASE CONDITION ASSESSMENT 10.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 10.2.1: Failure of floor joist at stair post.

Photo 10.2.2: Crack in concrete at overhead door.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

67B -

373 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.2.3: Building roof is finished with asphalt shingles

Photo 10.2.4: One of three exterior overhead garages

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

68B -

374 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.2.5: Moderate rusting at track bases

Photo 10.2.6: Failing Grout at hallway tile.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

69B -

375 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.2.7: Misaligned soffit at South West Corner.

10.3

HVAC

Photo 10.3.1 – Parham Ambulance Base Basement Furnace Venting

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

70B -

376 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.3.2 – Parham Ambulance Base Oil Tank

Photo 10.3.3 – Parham Ambulance Base ERV

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

71B -

377 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

10.4

Plumbing

Photo 10.4.1 – Parham Ambulance Base Basement Water Heater

10.5

Electrical

Photo 10.5.1: Parham Ambulance Base Main Panelboard.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

72B -

378 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.5.2: Parham Ambulance Base Garage Sub Panelboard.

Photo 10.5.3: Parham Ambulance Base Standby Generator.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

73B -

379 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 10.5.4: Aged Braided Wiring.

Photo 10.5.5: Air Conditioner Disconnect.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

74B -

380 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1) 12.0 HOWE ISLAND FERRY CONDITION ASSESSMENT 12.2

Architectural / Structural

Photo 12.2.1: Damaged guiderail at approach to building.

Photo 12.2.2: Failure of caulking at base flashing.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

75B -

381 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

. Photo 12.2.3: Window seals showing wear

Photo 12.2.4: Localized flooring damage covered.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

76B -

382 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 12.2.5: Interior metal bathroom door and frame showing surface wear.

12.3

HVAC

Photo 12.3.1 – Howe Island Ferry Building Unit Ventilator

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

77B -

383 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

12.4

Plumbing

Photo 12.4.1 – Howe Island Ferry Building Hot Water Heater

Photo 12.4.2 – Howe Island Ferry Building Bathroom Radiator

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

78B -

384 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 12.4.3 – Howe Island Ferry Building Sump Alarm

12.5

Electrical

Photo 12.5.1: Howe Island Ferry Building Main Panelboard.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

79B -

385 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 12.5.2: Meter Base Cabinet and Service Conduit Rusting.

Photo 12.5.3: Snow Plow Chained to Cable.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

80B -

386 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 12.5.4: Interior Lighting Requires Bulb Replacement.

Photo 12.5.5: Sump Pump Alarm.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

81B -

387 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

The County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessment Appendix B: Reference Photos (R1)

Photo 12.5.6: Holding Tank Access.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833

September 2019

82B -

388 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

JLR No.: 28833-000 Revision: 00

October 2, 2019

Prepared for:

Prepared by:

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC 2069 Battersea Road Glenburnie, ON K0H 1S0

J.L. RICHARDS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 203-863 Princess Street Kingston, ON K7L 5N4 Tel: 613-544-1424 Fax: 613-544-5679

2019 OSIM Report Structures: Millhaven Creek Bridge Hardwood Creek Bridge White Creek Bridge Elbow Creek Bridge Fish Creek Bridge

389 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report Table of Contents 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

6.0 7.0

Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Site Review …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Structure Information Summary ………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Observations …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Discussion and Recommendations……………………………………………………………………… 4 5.1 Recommended Maintenance Work …………………………………………………………… 6 5.1.1 Millhaven Creek Bridge …………………………………………………………………. 6 5.1.2 Hardwood Creek Bridge………………………………………………………………… 6 5.1.3 White Creek Bridge………………………………………………………………………. 6 5.1.4 Elbow Creek Bridge ……………………………………………………………………… 7 5.1.5 Fish Creek Bridge ………………………………………………………………………… 7 5.2 Recommended Rehabilitation/Replacement Work ………………………………………. 7 5.2.1 Millhaven Creek Bridge …………………………………………………………………. 7 5.2.2 Hardwood Creek Bridge………………………………………………………………… 7 5.2.3 White Creek Bridge………………………………………………………………………. 8 5.2.4 Elbow Creek Bridge ……………………………………………………………………… 8 5.2.5 Fish Creek Bridge ………………………………………………………………………… 8 5.3 Recommended Additional Investigations ……………………………………………………. 8 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Limitations on Use ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 9

List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C

OSIM Inventory Data and Inspection Forms Site Photographs Bridge Condition Index Tables

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-i-

390 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report 1.0

Introduction

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited (JLR) was retained by the County of Frontenac (the County) to complete the 2019 biennial Ontario Structure Inspection Manual (OSIM) visual condition assessments of five recreational bridges located along the K&P Trail as part of a larger Asset Condition Assessment project. The objective of these bridge assessments was to determine the general condition of each structure’s elements, and to make general recommendations for repair (maintenance and/or rehabilitation) for any observed deficiencies. Opinions of probable construction costs (OPCC) for the recommended maintenance and/or repairs were requested, and are therefore provided as part of this report. Structure-specific OSIM information and forms are provided in Appendix A of this report. Refer to Appendix B for photographs of each structure, and Appendix C for a breakdown of Bridge Condition Index (BCI) information.

2.0

Site Review

The site review was completed in accordance with the requirements of the Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act, Ontario Regulation 104/97, and under the guidance of the OSIM 2000, rev. 2003, 2008. The last known OSIM reviews of these structures were completed in 2017. The 2019 reviews of these five bridges were completed on August 7-8, 2019 by Cory Dyer, P.Eng, of JLR.

3.0

Structure Information Summary

The following is a summary of relevant structure information. Refer to the OSIM Forms in Appendix A for more information. It should be noted that the Total Current Value, Total Replacement Value, and Total Rehabilitative Needs for each bridge are based on the BCI unit rates and condition of each bridge at the time of review and are intended for comparison purposes only. The presented values are not a prediction of actual costs and current valuation, and do not consider labour, equipment and administrative costs or other market factors. Do not use the presented values for project budgeting.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-1-

391 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report Structure: Millhaven Creek Bridge General Structure Information Year Built:

2010

Type:

Modular Pre-Eng. Steel

Last Rehabilitation Unknown Work: Road Name: K&P Trail

Total Deck Length:

11.8 m

Total Deck Width:

3.65 m

No. of Lanes:

No. of Spans:

Crossing Over:

Millhaven Creek Pedestrian, Bicycle, Snowmobile, Maintenance Vehicles

Total Current Value:

$65,300.00

Total Replacement Value:

$93,700.00

Total Rehabilitative Needs:

$0.00

Bridge Condition Index:

Type of Traffic:

Avg. Annual Daily Unknown Traffic (AADT): Posted Speed: N/A

Structure: Hardwood Creek Bridge General Structure Information Year Built: Unknown Last Rehabilitation 2012 Work: Road Name: K&P Trail No. of Lanes: Crossing Over: Type of Traffic:

Type:

Steel Truss

Total Deck Length:

13.1 m

Total Deck Width:

4.15 m

No. of Spans:

Hardwood Creek Pedestrian, Bicycle, Snowmobile, Maintenance Vehicles

Total Current Value:

$73,700.00

Total Replacement Value:

$119,700.00

Total Rehabilitative Needs:

$40,000.00

Bridge Condition Index:

Avg. Annual Daily Unknown Traffic (AADT): Posted Speed: N/A

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-2-

392 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report Structure: White Creek Bridge General Structure Information Year Built: 2014 Last Rehabilitation Unknown Work: Road Name: K&P Trail No. of Lanes: Crossing Over: Type of Traffic:

Type:

Steel Girder

Total Deck Length:

5.8 m

Total Deck Width:

3.8 m

No. of Spans:

White Creek Pedestrian, Bicycle, Snowmobile, Maintenance Vehicles

Total Current Value:

$74,600.00

Total Replacement Value:

$109,700.00

Total Rehabilitative Needs:

$0.00

Bridge Condition Index:

Avg. Annual Daily Unknown Traffic (AADT): Posted Speed: N/A

Structure: Elbow Creek Bridge General Structure Information Year Built: 2015 Last Rehabilitation Unknown Work: Road Name: K&P Trail No. of Lanes: Crossing Over: Type of Traffic:

Type:

Solid Slab

Total Deck Length:

14.6 m

Total Deck Width:

3.8 m

No. of Spans:

Millhaven Creek Pedestrian, Bicycle, Snowmobile, Maintenance Vehicles

Total Current Value:

$29,900.00

Total Replacement Value:

$44,200.00

Total Rehabilitative Needs:

$5,000.00

Bridge Condition Index:

Avg. Annual Daily Unknown Traffic (AADT): Posted Speed: N/A

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-3-

393 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report Structure: Fish Creek Bridge General Structure Information Year Built:

2015

Type:

Longitudinal Timber Deck

Last Rehabilitation Unknown Work: Road Name: K&P Trail

Total Deck Length:

5.5 m

Total Deck Width:

No. of Lanes:

No. of Spans:

Crossing Over:

Millhaven Creek Pedestrian, Bicycle, Snowmobile, Maintenance Vehicles

Total Current Value:

$61,400.00

Total Replacement Value:

$87,600.00

Total Rehabilitative Needs:

$15,000.00

Bridge Condition Index:

Type of Traffic:

Avg. Annual Daily Unknown Traffic (AADT): Posted Speed: N/A

The Total Current Values, Total Replacement Values, and Bridge Condition Index values were determined in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the OSIM’s BCI document entitled “Bridge Condition Index (BCI) – An Overall Measure of Bridge Condition”. Refer to Appendix C for a breakdown of the BCI information.

4.0

Observations

The observations made by Cory Dyer, P.Eng, during the on site assessment are detailed in the OSIM – Inspection Forms and can be found in Appendix A. Reference photographs for each bridge are included in Appendix B. The condition of each of the bridge elements was assessed according to OSIM standards and a BCI calculation was completed for each bridge. Refer to Appendix C for the detailed BCI calculations.

5.0

Discussion and Recommendations

The calculated BCI values were determined by following the guidelines set forth by the OSIM’s BCI document entitled “Bridge Condition Index (BCI) – An Overall Measure of Bridge Condition”. For the purpose of qualifying the overall condition of the structures, JLR has categorized the structures based on the following table. This table was developed by referencing the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) rating table provided on the MTO’s Bridge Repairs webpage.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-4-

394 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Calculated BCI

Condition Rating

90 – 100

Excellent

75 – 89

Good

55 – 74

Fair

40 – 54

Poor

<40

Very Poor

*Values are inclusive.

Overall, the structures (in order or ID number) have Bridge Condition Index values (BCIs) of 70, 61, 68, 68, and 70, indicating that, in general, the structures are in fair condition. Refer to Appendix C for a breakdown of the BCI calculations. Opinions of probable construction costs (OPCC) are provided in the tables below for the recommended maintenance and rehabilitation work. Please note that in providing OPCCs, it should be understood that JLR has no control over the cost availability of labour, equipment or materials, or market conditions or Contractor’s method of pricing, and that our OPCCs are made on the basis of our professional judgement and experience. JLR makes no warranty, express or implied, that the bids or the negotiated cost of Work will not vary from our OPCC. Please note that OPCC values provided in this report are based on the unit costs presented in Table 2.1 – Unit Costs of Bridge Elements, provided in the OSIM’s BCI document entitled “Bridge Condition Index (BCI) – An Overall Measure of Bridge Condition”. It should be noted that the unit costs from Table 2.1 were developed by the Province of Ontario in 2013, and therefore do not reflect current dollar values and/or today’s market prices. It is recommended that the County accounts for inflation and current markets when developing their budget for maintenance and rehabilitation or replacement. The OPCC values provided in this report should be considered a general baseline for structure element maintenance and rehabilitative needs, and therefore do not include the following: • • • • • • • • • •

Any cost associated with the detailed design and/or engineering pertaining to any repairs. Mobilization and demobilization costs. Construction challenges and site constraints for the particular bridge. Detours. Demolition costs. Temporary shoring work. Costs associated with the disposal of removed/demolition materials. Harmonized sales tax. Costs associated with building permits. Construction contingency values.

OPCCs for any additional investigation work are not provided in this report.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-5-

395 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report 5.1

Recommended Maintenance Work

The following tables summarize the recommended maintenance work for each structure as of the time of review. 5.1.1

Millhaven Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Approach Slabs

Approaches

Barriers

Approaches

Stream

Below Bridge

Maintenance Needs Regrade granular wearing surfaces Remove vegetation around guiderails Clear sticks and debris

Urgency

OPCC ($)

1 year

$1,500.00

Urgent

$500.00

Urgent

$500.00

Total recommended maintenance work: 5.1.2

Hardwood Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Approach Slabs

Approaches

Approach Barriers

4 Corners

Maintenance Needs Regrade granular wearing surfaces. Properly fasten bolts for guardrail posts

$2,500.00

Urgency

OPCC ($)

1 year

$1,500.00

Urgent

$500.00

Signs

4 Corners

Replace knocked-over sign

Urgent

$300.00

Access Gate

North end of approach

Repaint rusting steel

1 year

$1,000.00

Total recommended maintenance work: 5.1.3

White Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Maintenance Needs

$3,300.00

Urgency

OPCC ($)

None Total recommended maintenance work:

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-6-

396 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

$0.00

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report 5.1.4

Elbow Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Maintenance Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

Barriers

Approaches

Remove overgrown vegetation around guiderails

Urgent

$500.00

Signs

4 Corners of approaches

Replace missing sign

Urgent

$500.00

Joint Seals

Joints

Refasten loose seal to bridge deck

Urgent

$500.00

Total recommended maintenance work:

5.1.5

$1,500.00

Fish Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Maintenance Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

Access Gate

North end of approach

Repaint, replace reflective stickers

2 years

$1,000.00

Total recommended maintenance work:

5.2

$1,000.00

Recommended Rehabilitation/Replacement Work

The following table summarizes the recommended rehabilitative and replacement needs of each structure as of the time of review. 5.2.1

Millhaven Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Rehabilitation Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

None Total recommended rehabilitation work:

$0.00

5.2.2

Hardwood Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Rehabilitation Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

Each end of bridge Each side of bridge

Rehab masonry around water level

6-10 years

$15,000.00

Replace railing system

1-5 years

$15,000.00

Deck

Replace timber wearing surface

1-5 years

$10,000.00

Abutment Walls Railing System Deck Wearing Surface

Total recommended rehabilitation work:

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-7-

397 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

$40,000.00

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report 5.2.3

White Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Rehabilitation Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

None Total recommended rehabilitation work: 5.2.4

Elbow Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Deck Top

Deck

Deck Wearing Surface Approach Barriers

Deck Each side of approaches

Rehabilitation Needs Scheduled to be replaced this year Scheduled to be replaced this year Rehab damaged section

$0.00

Urgency

OPCC ($)

N/A

1-5 years

$5,000.00

Total recommended rehabilitation work: 5.2.5

$5,000.00

Fish Creek Bridge

Element

Location

Rehabilitation Needs

Urgency

OPCC ($)

North Abutment Wall

North abutment

Rehab eroded mortar at bottom of wall

1-5 years

$15,000.00

Total recommended rehabilitation work:

5.3

$15,000.00

Recommended Additional Investigations

The next biennial inspections should be scheduled no later than August 2021.

6.0

Conclusion

In conclusion, the bridges are currently all in fair condition, with BCI values between 61 and 70. The total costs for the maintenance needs for each bridge are summarized in the following table, and should be completed within the timeframes noted in Section 5.1.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-8-

398 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report Bridge

Cost

Millhaven Creek

$2,500.00

Hardwood Creek

$3,300.00

White Creek

$0.00

Elbow Creek

$1,500.00

Fish Creek

$1,000.00

The total costs for the rehabilitation/replacement needs for each bridge are summarized in the following table, and should be completed within the timeframes noted in Section 5.2. Bridge

Cost

Millhaven Creek

$0.00

Hardwood Creek

$40,000.00

White Creek

$0.00

Elbow Creek

$5,000.00

Fish Creek

$15,000.00

There are no recommended additional investigations for any of the bridges at this time.

7.0

Limitations on Use

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the County of Frontenac, for the stated purpose, for the named facility. Its discussions and conclusions are summary in nature and cannot be properly used, interpreted or extended to other purposes without a detailed understanding and discussions with the client as to its mandated purpose, scope and limitations. This report was prepared for the sole benefit and use of The County of Frontenac and may not be used or relied on by any other party without the express written consent of J.L. Richards & Associates Limited. This report is copyright protected and may not be reproduced or used, other than by the County of Frontenac for the stated purpose, without the express written consent of J.L. Richards & Associates Limited.

J.L. Richards & Associates Limited JLR No.: 28833-000

-9-

399 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

October 2, 2019 Revision: 00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

400 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

OSIM Forms

401 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Millhaven Creek Bridge

402 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Structure Name: Millhaven Creek Bridge INVENTORY DATA ☒ On ☐ Under

Main Hwy/Road #

☐ Navig. Water ☒ Non-Navig. Water ☐ Road ☐ Ped. ☐ Other ☐ Rail

Crossing Type

Hwy/Road Name

K&P Trail

Structure Location

600 m north of Quinn Rd. East

Latitude

44.38684

Longitude

-76.64158

Owner(s)

County of Frontenac

Heritage Designation

☐ Not Cons. ☐ Cons/not App. ☐ List/not Desig. ☐ Desig./not List ☐ Desig. & List

MTO Region

Eastern

Road Class

☐ Freeway ☐ Arterial ☐ Collector ☐ Local

MTO District

Kingston

Posted Speed

No. of Lanes

Old County

Frontenac

AADT

% Trucks

Geographic Twp.

Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type

Modular Pre-Eng Steel

Interchange Number

Total Deck Length

11.8

(m)

Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width

3.655

(m)

Min. Vertical Clearance

Total Deck Area

43.1

(sq.m)

Special Routes

Roadway Width

(m)

Detour Length Around Bridge

(Degrees)

Direction of Structure

Skew Angle No. of Spans

Span Lengths

11.8

☐ Transit ☐ School

(m) ☐ Truck ☐ Bicycle (km) NW/SE

Fill on Structures

(m)

HISTORICAL DATA Year Built

2010

Year of Last Major Rehab

Last OSIM Inspection

06/10/2017

Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection

Current Load Limit

Enhanced Access Equipment (ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Load Limit By-Law #

Last Underwater Inspection

By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey Rehab History (Date/description) Unknown

Page | 1

403 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

12140 lb/section

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION Date of Inspections: August 8, 2019 Inspector:

☒ OSIM ☐ Enhanced OSIM

Type of Inspection:

Cory Dyer, P.Eng.

Others in Party: Access Equipment Used:

None

Weather:

Sunny

Temperature:

°C

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED None X X X X X X X X X X X

Material Condition Survey Detailed Deck Condition Survey Non destructive Delamination Survey of Asphalt-Covered Deck Concrete Substructure Condition Survey Detailed Coating Condition Survey Detailed Timber Investigation Post-Tensioned Strand Investigation Underwater Investigation Fatigue Investigation Seismic Investigation Structure Evaluation Monitoring Monitoring of Deformation, Settlements and Movements Monitoring Crack Widths Investigation Notes: OVERALL STRUCTURE NOTES Recommended Work on Structure ☐ None Timing of Recommended Work

☐ 1 to 5 years

☐ Minor Rehab.

Priority Normal

Urgent

X X

☐ Major Rehab.

☐ 6 to 10 years

Overall comments Date of Next Inspection

Page | 2

404 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ Replace

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Walls

Width:

6.78

Location:

Each end of bridge

Height:

1.7

Material:

Concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

23.1

Total Quantity: Moderate

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

15.7

7.4

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor-moderate cracking and wear Continue to monitor ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Bearings

Width:

Location:

Each end of bridge

Height:

m 2

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Not observable Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 3

405 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Signs

Width:

Location:

4 Corners of bridge

Height:

m 4

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

5.4

Element Name:

Approach Slabs

Width:

3.25

Location:

North West end of bridge

Height:

Material:

Granular

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

17.55

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

6.75

10.8

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: North West side need regrading Vegetation becoming overgrown at approaches Maintenance Needs: Regrade Clear vegetation around approach guiderails Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 4

406 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

Element Name:

Approach Slabs

Width:

3.25

Location:

South East end of bridge

Height:

Material:

Granular

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

22.75

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

8.75

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: South East side need regrading South East side has significant erosion/washout at edges ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Regrade Repair areas of erosion/washout

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Posts

Width:

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 5

407 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Railing Systems

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type:

Guardrail

Total Quantity:

Environment:

Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

2 m

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Some minor damage (due to collision) causing dents and scratches ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Floor Beams

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck

Height:

Material:

Steel C channels

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

3.655

40 146.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

146.2

Comments: Underside was not reviewed due to high water level. No sag or other deficiencies observed from the top. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 6

408 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Girders

Width:

Location:

Underside of floor beams

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

12.4

6 74.4

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

74.4

Comments: Light corrosion along bottom of outside girders Inside girders were not reviewed due to high water level. ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

11.8

Element Name:

Deck Top

Width:

3.655

Location: Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Height: 1

43.1

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

43.1

Comments: Minor wear Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 7

409 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Embankments & Streams

Length:

Element Name:

Stream

Width:

Location:

Stream

Height:

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Environment:

Benign

All

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Sticks and debris below bridge may be used for beaver dam construction Maintenance Needs: Remove sticks and debris from below bridge Recommended Work:

☒ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 8

410 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Hardwood Creek Bridge

411 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Structure Name: Hardwood Creek Bridge INVENTORY DATA ☒ On ☐ Under

Main Hwy/Road #

☐ Navig. Water ☒ Non-Navig. Water ☐ Road ☐ Ped. ☐ Other ☐ Rail

Crossing Type

Hwy/Road Name

K&P Trail

Structure Location

70 m S of Bellrock Rd.

Latitude

44.47076

Longitude

-76.69659

Owner(s)

County of Frontenac

Heritage Designation

☐ Not Cons. ☐ Cons/not App. ☐ List/not Desig. ☐ Desig./not List ☐ Desig. & List

MTO Region

Eastern

Road Class

☐ Freeway ☐ Arterial ☐ Collector ☐ Local

MTO District

Kingston

Posted Speed

No. of Lanes

Old County

Frontenac

AADT

% Trucks

Geographic Twp.

Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type

Truss

Total Deck Length

13.1

(m)

Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width

4.8

(m)

Min. Vertical Clearance

Total Deck Area

62.9

(sq.m)

Special Routes

Roadway Width

3.5

(m)

Detour Length Around Bridge

(Degrees)

Direction of Structure

Skew Angle No. of Spans

Span Lengths

13.1

Interchange Number

☐ Transit ☐ School

Fill on Structures

(m) ☐ Truck ☐ Bicycle (km) N/S (m)

HISTORICAL DATA Year Built Last OSIM Inspection

Year of Last Major Rehab 28/09/2017

Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection

Current Load Limit

Enhanced Access Equipment (ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Load Limit By-Law #

Last Underwater Inspection

By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey Rehab History (Date/description) 2012 – New guardrail; repairs to masonry abutments.

Page | 1

412 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

(tonnes)

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION Date of Inspections: August 7, 2019 Inspector:

☒ OSIM ☐ Enhanced OSIM

Type of Inspection:

Cory Dyer, P.Eng.

Others in Party: Access Equipment Used: Weather:

Overcast

Temperature:

°C

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED None X X X X X X X X X X X

☒ Minor Rehab.

Priority Normal

Urgent

X X

☐ Major Rehab.

☐ Replace

Timing of Recommended Work

☒ 1 to 5 years

☐ 6 to 10 years

Overall comments

Replace guardrail railings with a code-compliant alternative, rehab masonry abutment walls, multiple maintenance items

Date of Next Inspection

Page | 2

413 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Wall - Masonry

Width:

6.8

Location:

Each end of bridge

Height:

2.0

Material:

Masonry

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

27.2

Total Quantity: Moderate

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

17.1

10.1

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Bottom 1 m in fair condition ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

Repoint masonry at creek level

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☒ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Wall - Concrete

Width:

5.9

Location:

Each end of bridge (shorter portion)

Height:

1.2

Material:

Concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

14.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

14.2

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 3

414 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Ballast Wall

Width:

5.9

Location:

Each end of bridge (taller portion)

Height:

1.2

Material:

Concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

14.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

14.2

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Bearings

Width:

Location:

4 corners of trusses

Height:

Material:

Rubber mats on concrete ballast walls

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Bearing plate separating from bearing pad in one corner. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 4

415 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Signs

Width:

Location:

4 corners (approaches)

Height:

m 4

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: 1 sign (NW) has been knocked over ☒ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Replace sign

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Access gate

Width:

Location:

North end of approach

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

each

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Mild rusting throughout Maintenance Needs: Repaint Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 5

416 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

13.3

Element Name:

Approach slabs

Width:

3.6

Location:

Each end of bridge

Height:

Material:

Granular

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 2 95.8

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

42.6

53.2

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Needs regrading Many large potholes and washouts ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Regrade approaches

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

Element Name:

Barriers

Width:

Location:

4 corners

Height:

Material:

Steel with steel posts

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

26.65

2 53.3

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

43.3

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Bolts are missing or not tightened in all 4 corners where posts fasten to concrete ballast wall Maintenance Needs: Properly fasten bolts for guardrail posts Recommended Work:

☒ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 6

417 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Railing System

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Weathered steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

11.1

2 22.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

22.2

Comments: Poor connection to structure, no connection to approach guardrails Does not meet code for guardrails ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☒ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Floor beams

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck

Height:

Material:

Steel W beams

Count:

Element Type:

4.15

4 16.6

Total Quantity:

Environment:

Benign

Protection System:

Paint

Condition Data:

Limited Inspection:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

☐

Performance Deficiencies:

16.6

Comments: Minor rusting Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 7

418 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Stringers

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck

Height:

Material:

Steel W beams

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Moderate

Protection System:

Paint

Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor rusting ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Diaphragms

Width:

Location:

Underside of Deck

Height:

Material:

Steel C beams and cable

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

4.55

10 45.5

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 8

419 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

13.1

Element Name:

Deck top

Width:

4.15

Location:

Under surface wearing layer

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

54.4

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

54.4

Comments: Only edges were observable No obvious issues ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

13.1

Element Name:

Wearing Surface

Width:

3.5

Location:

Deck top

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 1 45.9

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

35.9

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Heavy wear (abrasion, checks, splits, etc.) Moisture damage Lumber is rotting in select locations Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☒ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

Page | 9

420 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

13.1

Element Name:

Deck Soffit

Width:

3.5

Location:

Deck soffit

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 1 45.9

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☒ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Retaining Walls

Length:

4.3

Element Name:

Walls – approaches

Width:

1.0

Location:

4 corners

Height:

Material:

Gabion baskets

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 4 17.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

17.2

Comments: Generally in good condition Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 10

421 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Sidewalks/curbs

Length:

Element Name:

Curbs

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

13.1

2 26.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

26.2

Comments: Fair condition; will likely need to be replaced with new guardrail system ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Trusses/Arches

Length:

21.8

Element Name:

Top & Bottom Chords

Width:

0.15

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

0.075

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

19.62

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

17.82

1.8

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor rusting throughout Deformed (bending) bottom chord in one corner Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 11

422 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Trusses/Arches

Length:

21.8

Element Name:

Verticals / Diagonals

Width:

0.15

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

0.075

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

19.62

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

18.62

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor rusting throughout Deformed (twisting) minor diagonal chord at one corner Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 12

423 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

White Creek Bridge

424 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Structure Name: White Creek Bridge INVENTORY DATA ☒ On ☐ Under

Main Hwy/Road #

☐ Navig. Water ☒ Non-Navig. Water ☐ Road ☐ Ped. ☐ Other ☐ Rail

Crossing Type

Hwy/Road Name

K&P Trail

Structure Location

400 m N of Westport Rd.

Latitude

44.545919

Longitude

-76.678083

Owner(s)

County of Frontenac

Heritage Designation

☐ Not Cons. ☐ Cons/not App. ☐ List/not Desig. ☐ Desig./not List ☐ Desig. & List

MTO Region

Eastern

Road Class

☐ Freeway ☐ Arterial ☐ Collector ☐ Local

MTO District

Kingston

Posted Speed

No. of Lanes

Old County

Frontenac

AADT

% Trucks

Geographic Twp.

Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type

Steel Girder

Interchange Number

Total Deck Length

5.8

(m)

Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width

3.8

(m)

Min. Vertical Clearance

Total Deck Area

22.0

(sq.m)

Special Routes

Roadway Width

3.5

(m)

Detour Length Around Bridge

(Degrees)

Direction of Structure

Skew Angle No. of Spans

Span Lengths

5.9

☐ Transit ☐ School

Fill on Structures

(m) ☐ Truck ☐ Bicycle (km) N/S (m)

HISTORICAL DATA Year Built

2014

Year of Last Major Rehab

Last OSIM Inspection

28/09/2017

Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection

Current Load Limit

Enhanced Access Equipment (ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Load Limit By-Law #

Last Underwater Inspection

By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey Rehab History (Date/description)

Page | 1

425 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

(tonnes)

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION Date of Inspections: August 7, 2019 Inspector:

☒ OSIM ☐ Enhanced OSIM

Type of Inspection:

Cory Dyer, P.Eng.

Others in Party: Access Equipment Used: Weather:

Overcast

Temperature:

°C

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED None X X X X X X X X X X X

☐ 1 to 5 years

☐ Minor Rehab.

Priority Normal

Urgent

X X

☐ Major Rehab.

☐ 6 to 10 years

Overall comments Date of Next Inspection

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Page | 2

426 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ Replace

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Wall

Width:

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

4.5

Material:

Masonry

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

4.8

m m m

43.2

Total Quantity: Moderate

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

31.2

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Bottom 1.5 m is deteriorated at water level and is showing erosion of mortar ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Walls

Width:

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

Material:

Concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Moderate

4.8

☒ 6 – 10 years

m m m

Total Quantity:

9.6

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

9.6

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 3

427 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☒ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Bearings

Width:

Location:

Each end

Height:

Material:

Neoprene pad

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

All

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

All

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Unable to observe number of pads, assume 2 each side ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Wing Walls

Width:

Location:

Sides of abutment walls

Height:

Material:

Masonry

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Moderate

☐ 6 – 10 years

m m m

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Bottom 1.0 m is deteriorated at water level and is showing erosion of mortar Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 4

428 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☒ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Signs

Width:

Location:

4 corners of approaches

Height:

m 4

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: 3 signs are getting overgrowth with brush Maintenance Needs:

☐ Urgent

Trim brush

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

24.1

Element Name:

Approach Slabs

Width:

3.7

Location: Material:

Granular

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Height:

89.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

48.2

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Regrade adjacent to guardrail Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

Re-grade

☐ Urgent

☒ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 5

429 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

Element Name:

Barriers

Width:

Location:

4 corners

Height:

Material:

Steel with wood/steel posts

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor dent (NW side) Broken support at post near dent ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Hand Railings

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

6.65

2 13.3

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

13.3

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 6

430 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Posts

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Railing System

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Steel guard

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

5.9

2 11.8

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

11.8

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 7

431 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Floor Beams

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

3.5

Total Quantity:

3.5

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

3.5

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Girders

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck, sides of bridge

Height:

0.53

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Environment:

Benign

5.8

☐ 6 – 10 years

m m m

6.15

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

6.15

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 8

432 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Beams/Main Long. Elements

Length:

Element Name:

Stringers

Width:

Location:

Underside of deck

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

5.8

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Not observable due to water level ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

5.8

Element Name:

Deck Top

Width:

3.5

Location:

Underside of wearing surface

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 1 20.3

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

20.3

Comments: Minor wear Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 9

433 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

5.8

Element Name:

Wearing Surface

Width:

3.5

Location:

Top

Height:

Material:

Lumber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

m 1 20.3

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

20.3

Comments: Minor wear Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 10

434 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Elbow Creek Bridge

435 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Structure Name: Elbow Creek Bridge INVENTORY DATA ☒ On ☐ Under

☐ Navig. Water ☒ Non-Navig. Water ☐ Road ☐ Ped. ☐ Other ☐ Rail

Main Hwy/Road #

N/A

Hwy/Road Name

K&P Trail

Structure Location

2.6 km north of Ball Rd.

Latitude

44.62968

Longitude

-76.67876

Owner(s)

County of Frontenac

Heritage Designation

☐ Not Cons. ☐ Cons/not App. ☐ List/not Desig. ☐ Desig./not List ☐ Desig. & List

MTO Region

Eastern

Road Class

☐ Freeway ☐ Arterial ☐ Collector ☐ Local

MTO District

Kingston

Posted Speed

No. of Lanes

Old County

Frontenac

AADT

% Trucks

Geographic Twp.

Crossing Type

Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type

Solid Slab

Total Deck Length

14.6

(m)

Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width

3.8

(m)

Min. Vertical Clearance

Total Deck Area

55.5

(sq.m)

Special Routes

Roadway Width

(m)

Detour Length Around Bridge

Skew Angle

(Degrees)

Direction of Structure

No. of Spans

Span Lengths

5, 4.6, 5

Interchange Number

☐ Transit ☐ School

Fill on Structures

(m) ☐ Truck ☐ Bicycle (km) N-S (m)

HISTORICAL DATA Year Built

2015

Year of Last Major Rehab

Last OSIM Inspection

28/09/2017

Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection

Current Load Limit

Enhanced Access Equipment (ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Load Limit By-Law #

Last Underwater Inspection

By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey Rehab History (Date/description)

Page | 1

436 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

(tonnes)

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION Date of Inspections: August 7, 2019 Inspector:

Cory Dyer, P.Eng.

Others in Party:

None.

☒ OSIM ☐ Enhanced OSIM

Type of Inspection:

Access Equipment Used: Weather:

Rain

Temperature:

°C

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED None X X X X X X X X X X X

☐ 1 to 5 years

☐ Minor Rehab.

Priority Normal

Urgent

X X

☐ Major Rehab.

☐ 6 to 10 years

Overall comments Date of Next Inspection

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Page | 2

437 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ Replace

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Walls

Width:

5.4

Location:

Each end

Height:

Material:

Wood

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

10.8

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

10.8

Comments: ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Bearings

Width:

Location:

Each end

Height:

☐ 6 – 10 years

m 3.8

m m

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Environment:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

each

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Some minor wear Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 3

438 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Signs

Width:

Location:

Each corner of approaches

Height:

m 4

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: 1 sign missing altogether ☒ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Replace missing sign

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

Element Name:

Barriers

Width:

Location:

4 corners

Height:

Material:

Steel with wood or steel posts

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

46.5

Performance Deficiencies:

3.5

Comments: Damaged at NE corner. Disconnected from 2 posts. Maintenance Needs: Clear vegetation overgrowth around guiderails Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☒ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years

☐ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

Page | 4

439 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Hand Railings

Width:

Location:

Each side

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Posts

Width:

Location:

At guards

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No concerns Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 5

440 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Railing Systems

Width:

Location:

Each side of bridge

Height:

Material:

Steel guards

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

14.5

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

14.6

Element Name:

Deck Top

Width:

3.8

Location: Material:

Wood with FRP wrap

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Height:

55.5

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

50.5

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: FRP top layer is locally damaged. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

Page | 6

441 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

14.6

Element Name:

Soffit – Thin Slab

Width:

3.8

Location: Material:

Wood with FRP wrap

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Height:

55.5

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Not observable from below ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

14.6

Element Name:

Wearing Surface

Width:

3.8

Location: Material:

Tar and chip

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Height:

55.5

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☒

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

26.5

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Worn a lot in middle span and moderate amount on outside spans. Remainder is ok. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work: Scheduled to be replaced this year

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

Page | 7

442 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Embankments & Streams

Length:

Element Name:

Slope Protection

Width:

Location:

Height:

Material:

Count:

2 baskets per corner

Element Type:

Gabion baskets

Total Quantity:

each

Environment:

Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

each

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Some gabion baskets appear to be overturning. Overgrown with brush ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Joints

Length:

Element Name:

Seals (and covers)

Width:

Location:

Deck Top

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

3.8

4 15.2

Total Quantity: Benign

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

15.2

Comments: Maintenance Needs: Refasten one to bridge deck Recommended Work:

☒ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 8

443 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Piers

Length:

Element Name:

Columns

Width:

Location:

Bridge 1/3 points

Height:

Material:

Concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Moderate

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☒

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: 6 piers/supports (bearing seats), concrete-filled corrugated steel pipe. Rust/corrosion on steel cover at water level. Not observable at ends of bridge. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 9

444 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Fish Creek Bridge

445 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Structure Name: Fish Creek Bridge INVENTORY DATA ☐ On ☐ Under

Main Hwy/Road #

☐ Navig. Water ☒ Non-Navig. Water ☐ Road ☐ Ped. ☐ Other ☐ Rail

Crossing Type

Hwy/Road Name

K&P Trail

Structure Location

80 m SW of Fish Creek Rd

Latitude

44.64549

Longitude

-76.68797

Owner(s)

County of Frontenac

Heritage Designation

☐ Not Cons. ☐ Cons/not App. ☐ List/not Desig. ☐ Desig./not List ☐ Desig. & List

MTO Region

Eastern

Road Class

☐ Freeway ☐ Arterial ☐ Collector ☐ Local

MTO District

Kingston

Posted Speed

No. of Lanes

Old County

Frontenac

AADT

% Trucks

Geographic Twp.

Inspection Route Sequence

Structure Type

Longitudinal Timber Deck

Interchange Number

Total Deck Length

5.5

(m)

Interchange Structure Number

Overall Str. Width

(m)

Min. Vertical Clearance

Total Deck Area

(sq.m)

Special Routes

Roadway Width

3.78

(m)

Detour Length Around Bridge

(Degrees)

Direction of Structure

Skew Angle No. of Spans

Span Lengths

5.5

☐ Transit ☐ School

Fill on Structures

(m) ☐ Truck ☐ Bicycle (km) N-S (m)

HISTORICAL DATA Year Built

2015

Year of Last Major Rehab

Last OSIM Inspection

28/09/2017

Last Evaluation

Last Enhanced OSIM Inspection

Current Load Limit

Enhanced Access Equipment (ladder, boat, lift, etc.)

Load Limit By-Law #

Last Underwater Inspection

By-Law Expiry Date

Last Condition Survey Rehab History (Date/description)

Page | 1

446 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

(tonnes)

AGENDA ITEM #a)

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM FIELD INSPECTION INFORMATION Date of Inspections: August 7, 2019 Inspector:

☒ OSIM ☐ Enhanced OSIM

Type of Inspection:

Cory Dyer, P.Eng.

Others in Party: Access Equipment Used: Weather:

Overcast

Temperature:

°C

ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED None X X X X X X X X X X X

☒ Minor Rehab.

Priority Normal

Urgent

X X

☐ Major Rehab.

Timing of Recommended Work

☒ 1 to 5 years

☐ 6 to 10 years

Overall comments

Rehab required at bottom of abutment walls

Date of Next Inspection

STRUCTURE INSPECTION FORM Page | 2

447 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ Replace

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Abutment Walls

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Stone and mortar

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Moderate

m m m

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

58.5

13.5

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Mortar has eroded along the bottom 1.5 m of the north abutment. Rehab recommended. ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☒ Rehab.

Recommended Work: Rehab eroded mortar Repoint masonry

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☒ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Ballast Walls

Width:

0.4

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Cast-in-place concrete

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 3

448 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Abutments

Length:

Element Name:

Bearings

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Rubber

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Signs

Width:

Location:

4 corners of approach

Height:

Material:

Steel post and rubberized sign

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: One sign is missing. Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 4

449 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Accessories

Length:

Element Name:

Access gate

Width:

Location:

North side

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Minor wear and surface rust, wear of reflective stickers ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs: Paint, replace stickers

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☒ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Approaches

Length:

Element Name:

Barriers

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Steel guard

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 5

450 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Hand Railings

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Posts

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Steel

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 6

451 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Barriers

Length:

Element Name:

Railing System

Width:

Location:

Both sides

Height:

Material:

Steel guard

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

5.5

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

5.5

Element Name:

Deck Top

Width:

m m

Location:

Height:

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☒

Environment:

Benign

1 m2

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

m2 Comments: Not observable – no obvious issues Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 7

452 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

5.5

Element Name:

Soffit – Thin Slab

Width:

Location:

Underside of bridge

Height:

Material:

Wood with FRP wrap

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

m 1

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments ☐ Urgent

Maintenance Needs:

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

Recommended Work:

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

☐ 6 – 10 years

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Decks

Length:

5.5

Element Name:

Wearing Surface

Width:

Location:

Bridge Deck Top

Height:

Material:

Tar and chip asphalt

Count:

Element Type: Environment:

Benign

m 1

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: Some gravel accumulation on top Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 8

453 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

ELEMENT DATA Element Group:

Embankments & Streams

Length:

Element Name:

Streams – Waterways

Width:

Location:

Underside of bridge

Height:

Material:

Count:

Element Type:

Total Quantity:

Limited Inspection:

☐

Environment:

Benign

each

Protection System: Condition Data:

Units

Excellent

each

Good

Fair

Poor

Performance Deficiencies:

Comments: No comments Maintenance Needs: Recommended Work:

☐ Urgent

☐ 1 year

☐ Rehab.

☐ 2 years ☐ Replace

☐ 1 – 5 years

Page | 9

454 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

☐ 6 – 10 years

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Site Photographs

455 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Millhaven Creek Bridge

456 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Millhaven Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 1: North-west approach (looking south-east)

Photo 2: North-west approach surface and guardrail

457 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Millhaven Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 3: Deck wearing surface / deck top

Photo 4: North-west abutment (west side)

458 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Millhaven Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 5: South-east abutment (west side)

Photo 6: South-east approach

459 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Millhaven Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 7: Damaged railing system (east side)

Photo 8: East elevation and north-west abutment

460 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Millhaven Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 9: South-east abutment

461 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Hardwood Creek Bridge

462 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 1: North approach and access gate (looking south)

Photo 2: Sign knocked over at north approach

463 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 3: Washout at north approach

Photo 4: Minor rusting on access gate

464 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 5: Gabion basket retaining wall along north approach

Photo 6: Nuts missing at barrier attachment points

465 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 7: Weathered steel railing (left) and steel truss (right)

Photo 8: Rot and wear of deck wearing surface

466 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 9: Railing system (left) not connected to approach guardrails (right)

Photo 10: South abutment (east side). Note twisting element at bottom centre.

467 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 11: South approach (looking north)

Photo 12: Light corrosion on bearing plate and separation from bearing pad.

468 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 13: Underside of deck at north abutment

Photo 14: Underside of deck (looking south)

469 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Hardwood Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 15: North abutment. Note bending chord member at far end.

470 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

White Creek Bridge

471 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges White Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 1: South approach (looking north)

Photo 2: Guardrail along south approach (west side)

472 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges White Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 3: Barrier along deck (east side)

Photo 4: Broken barrier support (north approach, west side)

473 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges White Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 5: Dent in guardrail beside broken support

Photo 6: North approach (looking south)

474 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges White Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 7: South abutment (east side)

Photo 8: East elevation and underside of deck

475 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges White Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 9: North abutment (west side)

Photo 10: North abutment

476 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Elbow Creek Bridge

477 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Elbow Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 1: South approach (looking north)

Photo 2: Deck wearing surface

478 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Elbow Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 3: North abutment (east side)

Photo 4: North approach (looking south)

479 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Elbow Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 5: Barrier damaged at north-east corner

Photo 6: Erosion on east side of north approach

480 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Elbow Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 7: West elevation, piers and columns

Photo 8: Handrail barrier post

481 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Fish Creek Bridge

482 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 1: Access gate at north end

Photo 2: North approach (looking south)

483 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 3: Wearing surface

Photo 4: West side guiderail and hand rail

484 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 5: South approach

Photo 6: South abutment and bearing pads (east side)

485 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 7: North abutment wall (west side)

Photo 8: West elevation (looking east)

486 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 9: Bearing pads (north side)

Photo 10: Bearing pads (south side)

487 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges Fish Creek Bridge Photos

Photo 11: North abutment wall

Photo 12: Knocked-over DANGER sign

488 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Bridge Condition Index Calculation

489 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Millhaven Creek Bridge

490 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Structure: Millhaven Creek Bridge Assessment Group

Element Abutments - Abutment Walls

Abutments

900

Joints

Piers

Sw/Curbs

Trusses/Arches

Ret. Walls

Culverts

Bracing

15.7

Poor (x0)

Current Element Value ($) $13,477.50 $0.00 $0.00

Abutments - Bearings

$0.00

Approaches - Wearing Surface

$0.00 40.3

140

$5,642.00

$0.00 15.5

14.8

$2,456.30

Approaches - Drainage System

$0.00

Approaches - Curb & Gutters

$0.00

Approaches - Sidewalk/Curb

$0.00

Barriers - Barrier/Parapet Walls

$0.00 48

200

$9,600.00

100

$2,600.00

Beams/MLEs - Girders

74.4

420

Beams/MLEs - Floor Beams

43.1

420

Barriers - Approach Guardrail

$0.00 38

$6,500.00

$0.00

$0.00 26

$1,950.00

$31,248.00

74.4

$23,436.00

$18,102.00

43.1

$13,576.50

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Stringers

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Inside Boxes

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Diaphragms (Concrete)

$0.00

Coatings - Structural Steel

$0.00

Coatings - Railing System/Hand Railings

$0.00

Deck - Wearing Surface

$0.00

Deck - Deck top Deck

Fair (x0.4)

$0.00

Barriers - Handrailings

Coatings

Good (x0.75)

Abutments - Wingwalls

Barriers - Posts

MLEs

$21,330.00

Excellent (x1.0)

$0.00

Barriers - Railing Systems Barriers

23.7

Total Replacement Value (TRV)

Abutments - Ballast Walls

Approaches - Approach Slabs Approaches

No. 28833-000 Unit Replacement Cost (Table 2.1)

Total Quantity

43.1

120

$5,172.00

$0.00 43.1

$3,879.00

Deck - Soffit (thin slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (thick slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (inside boxes)

$0.00

Deck - Drainage System

$0.00

Joints

$0.00

Joints - Armouring

$0.00

Joints - Concrete End Dams

$0.00

Piers - Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

$0.00

Piers - Caps

$0.00

Piers - Bearings

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Sidewalk and medians

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Curbs

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Top Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Bottom Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Vert./Diagonal

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Connections

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Walls

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Barrier Systems on Walls

$0.00

Culverts - Inlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Outlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Barrels

$0.00

Bracing

$0.00

Note: Sections including, foundations, embankments & streams, and accessories were not included as they do not impact the calculation. SUM

$93,694.00

BCI

491 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

SUM

$65,275.30

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Hardwood Creek Bridge

492 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Structure: Hardwood Creek Bridge Assessment Group

Abutments

Element

No. 28833-000 Unit Replacement Cost (Table 2.1)

Total Quantity

Deck

Joints

Piers

Sw/Curbs

500

$20,700.00

31.3

$4,970.00

14.2

Bracing

$13,757.50 $3,727.50

$3,000.00

$0.00 4

1000

$4,000.00

95.8

140

$13,412.00

$0.00

$0.00 42.6

53.2

$2,385.60

Approaches - Drainage System

$0.00

Approaches - Curb & Gutters

$0.00

Approaches - Sidewalk/Curb

$0.00

Barriers - Barrier/Parapet Walls

$0.00

Barriers - Railing Systems

22.2

200

$4,440.00

Barriers - Approach Guardrail

53.3

150

$7,995.00

$0.00

43.3

22.2

$0.00

$4,871.25

Barriers - Posts

$0.00

Barriers - Handrailings

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Girders

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Floor Beams

16.6

420

$6,972.00

16.6

$5,229.00

Beams/MLEs - Stringers

420

$27,300.00

$20,475.00

Beams/MLEs - Inside Boxes

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Diaphragms (Concrete)

$0.00

Coatings - Structural Steel

$0.00

Coatings - Railing System/Hand Railings

$0.00

Deck - Wearing Surface

45.9

$3,442.50

Deck - Deck top

54.4

120

$6,528.00

$0.00 35.9

54.4

$1,077.00 $4,896.00

Deck - Soffit (thin slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (thick slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (inside boxes)

$0.00

Deck - Drainage System

$0.00

Joints

$0.00

Joints - Armouring

$0.00

Joints - Concrete End Dams

$0.00

Piers - Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

$0.00

Piers - Caps

$0.00

Piers - Bearings

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Sidewalk and medians

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Curbs

26.2

$524.00

Trusses/Arches - Top and Bottom Chords

21.8

300

$6,540.00

17.82

1.8

$4,225.50

21.8

300

$6,540.00

18.62

$4,309.50

17.2

350

$6,020.00

Trusses/Arches - Connections

Culverts

Current Element Value ($)

350

Trusses/Arches Trusses/Arches - Vert./Diagonal

Ret. Walls

10.1

Poor (x0)

41.4

Approaches - Approach Slabs

Coatings

Fair (x0.4)

14.2

Approaches - Wearing Surface

MLEs

Good (x0.75)

Abutments - Abutment Walls

Abutments - Bearings

Barriers

Excellent (x1.0)

Abutments - Ballast Walls Abutments - Wingwalls

Approaches

Total Replacement Value (TRV)

Retaining Walls - Walls

26.2

$209.60

$0.00

$0.00 17.2

$4,515.00

Retaining Walls - Barrier Systems on Walls

$0.00

Culverts - Inlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Outlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Barrels

$0.00

Bracing

$0.00

Note: Sections including, foundations, embankments & streams, and accessories were not included as they do not impact the calculation. SUM

$119,383.50

BCI

493 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

SUM

$72,678.45

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

White Creek Bridge

494 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Structure: White Creek Bridge Assessment Group

Element Abutments - Abutment Walls

Abutments

No. 28833-000 Unit Replacement Cost (Table 2.1)

Total Quantity 52.8

900

Abutments - Ballast Walls

Coatings

Fair (x0.4)

40.8

$31,860.00

$14,595.00

$0.00

350

$22,400.00

Abutments - Bearings

1000

$4,000.00

$3,000.00

$0.00 89.2

140

$0.00

$12,488.00

48.2

$7,004.20

Approaches - Drainage System

$0.00

Approaches - Curb & Gutters

$0.00

Approaches - Sidewalk/Curb

$0.00

Barriers - Barrier/Parapet Walls

$0.00

Barriers - Railing Systems

MLEs

$47,520.00

Poor (x0)

Current Element Value ($)

Good (x0.75)

Abutments - Wingwalls

Approaches - Approach Slabs

Barriers

Excellent (x1.0)

$0.00

Approaches - Wearing Surface

Approaches

Total Replacement Value (TRV)

11.8

200

$0.00

$2,360.00

11.8 46

$1,770.00

Barriers - Approach Guardrail

200

$9,600.00

Barriers - Posts

200

$2,000.00

$7,060.00

Barriers - Handrailings

13.3

100

$1,330.00

13.3

Beams/MLEs - Girders

6.15

420

$2,583.00

6.15

$1,937.25

Beams/MLEs - Floor Beams

3.5

420

$1,470.00

3.5

$1,102.50

$2,000.00 $1,330.00

Beams/MLEs - Stringers

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Inside Boxes

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Diaphragms (Concrete)

$0.00

Coatings - Structural Steel

$0.00

Coatings - Railing System/Hand Railings

$0.00

Deck - Wearing Surface

20.3

$1,522.50

20.3

$1,141.88

Deck - Deck top

20.3

120

$2,436.00

20.3

$1,827.00

Deck - Soffit (thin slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (thick slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (inside boxes)

$0.00

Deck - Drainage System

$0.00

Joints

$0.00

Joints - Armouring

$0.00

Joints - Concrete End Dams

$0.00

Piers - Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

$0.00

Piers - Caps

$0.00

Piers - Bearings

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Sidewalk and medians

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Curbs

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Top Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Bottom Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches Trusses/Arches - Vert./Diagonal

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - All

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Connections

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Walls

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Barrier Systems on Walls

$0.00

Culverts - Inlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Outlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Barrels

$0.00

Bracing

$0.00

Deck

Joints

Piers

Sw/Curbs

Ret. Walls

Culverts

Bracing

Note: Sections including, foundations, embankments & streams, and accessories were not included as they do not impact the calculation. SUM

$109,709.50

BCI

495 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

SUM

$74,627.83

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Elbow Creek Bridge

496 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Structure: Elbow Creek Bridge Assessment Group

Element Abutments - Abutment Walls

Abutments

MLEs

Coatings

900

Abutments - Wingwalls

$0.00 4

1000

Excellent (x1.0)

$9,720.00 $0.00

Good (x0.75)

Fair (x0.4)

Poor (x0)

10.8

Current Element Value ($) $7,290.00 $0.00 $0.00

$4,000.00

$1,600.00

Approaches - Wearing Surface

$0.00

Approaches - Approach Slabs

$0.00

Approaches - Drainage System

$0.00

Approaches - Curb & Gutters

$0.00

Approaches - Sidewalk/Curb

$0.00

Barriers - Barrier/Parapet Walls

$0.00

Barriers - Railing Systems Barriers

10.8

Total Replacement Value (TRV)

Abutments - Ballast Walls

Abutments - Bearings

Approaches

No. 28833-000 Unit Replacement Cost (Table 2.1)

Total Quantity

200

$5,800.00

$0.00 29

$4,350.00

Barriers - Approach Guardrail

200

$10,000.00

Barriers - Posts

200

$3,200.00

46.5

3.5

$3,200.00

$6,975.00

Barriers - Handrailings

100

$3,400.00

Beams/MLEs - Girders

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Floor Beams

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Stringers

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Inside Boxes

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Diaphragms (Concrete)

$0.00

Coatings - Structural Steel

$0.00

Coatings - Railing System/Hand Railings

$0.00

Deck - Wearing Surface

55.5

$1,387.50

Deck - Deck top

55.5

120

$6,660.00

$0.00 26.5

$696.88

50.5

$2,424.00

Deck - Soffit (thin slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (thick slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (inside boxes)

$0.00

Deck - Drainage System

$0.00

Joints

$0.00

Joints - Armouring

$0.00

Joints - Concrete End Dams

$0.00

Piers - Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

$0.00

Piers - Caps

$0.00

Piers - Bearings

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Sidewalk and medians

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Curbs

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Top Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Bottom Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches Trusses/Arches - Vert./Diagonal

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - All

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Connections

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Walls

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Barrier Systems on Walls

$0.00

Culverts - Inlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Outlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Barrels

$0.00

Bracing

$0.00

Deck

Joints

Piers

Sw/Curbs

Ret. Walls

Culverts

Bracing

Note: Sections including, foundations, embankments & streams, and accessories were not included as they do not impact the calculation. SUM

$44,167.50

BCI

497 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

SUM

$29,935.88

AGENDA ITEM #a)

County of Frontenac K&P Trail Bridges 2019 OSIM Report

Fish Creek Bridge

498 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #a)

Structure: Fish Creek Bridge Assessment Group

Abutments

Element

No. 28833-000 Unit Replacement Cost (Table 2.1)

Total Quantity

MLEs

Coatings

Fair (x0.4) 13.5

Poor (x0)

Current Element Value ($)

900

$64,800.00

58.5

350

$4,200.00

$3,150.00

$1,500.00

$44,347.50

$0.00 2

1000

$2,000.00

$0.00

Approaches - Wearing Surface

$0.00

Approaches - Approach Slabs

$0.00

Approaches - Drainage System

$0.00

Approaches - Curb & Gutters

$0.00

Approaches - Sidewalk/Curb

$0.00

Barriers - Barrier/Parapet Walls

$0.00

Barriers - Railing Systems

200

$0.00

$2,200.00

$1,650.00 $6,600.00

Barriers - Approach Guardrail

200

$8,800.00

Barriers - Posts

200

$1,200.00

$900.00

Barriers - Handrailings

100

$1,200.00

$900.00

Beams/MLEs - Girders

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Floor Beams

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Stringers

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Inside Boxes

$0.00

Beams/MLEs - Diaphragms (Concrete)

$0.00

Coatings - Structural Steel

$0.00

Coatings - Railing System/Hand Railings

$0.00

Deck - Wearing Surface

$550.00

120

$2,640.00

Deck - Deck top Deck

Good (x0.75)

Abutments - Abutment Walls

Abutments - Bearings

Barriers

Excellent (x1.0)

Abutments - Ballast Walls Abutments - Wingwalls

Approaches

Total Replacement Value (TRV)

Deck - Soffit (thin slab)

$0.00 22

$412.50

$1,980.00

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (thick slab)

$0.00

Deck - Soffit (inside boxes)

$0.00

Deck - Drainage System

$0.00

Joints

$0.00

Joints - Armouring

$0.00

Joints - Concrete End Dams

$0.00

Piers - Shafts/Columns/Pile Bents

$0.00

Piers - Caps

$0.00

Piers - Bearings

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Sidewalk and medians

$0.00

Sidewalks/Curbs - Curbs

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Top Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Bottom Chords

$0.00

Trusses/Arches Trusses/Arches - Vert./Diagonal

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - All

$0.00

Trusses/Arches - Connections

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Walls

$0.00

Retaining Walls - Barrier Systems on Walls

$0.00

Culverts - Inlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Outlet Components

$0.00

Culverts - Barrels

$0.00

Bracing

$0.00

Joints

Piers

Sw/Curbs

Ret. Walls

Culverts

Bracing

Note: Sections including, foundations, embankments & streams, and accessories were not included as they do not impact the calculation. SUM

$87,590.00

BCI

499 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

SUM

$61,440.00

AGENDA ITEM #a)

www.jlrichards.ca

Ottawa

Kingston

Sudbury

Timmins

864 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa ON Canada K1Z 5M2 Tel: 613 728-3571

203-863 Princess Street Kingston ON Canada K7L 5N4 Tel: 613 544-1424

314 Countryside Drive Sudbury ON Canada P3E 6G2 Tel: 705 522-8174

834 Mountjoy Street S Timmins ON Canada P4N 7C5

ottawa@jlrichards.ca

kingston@jlrichards.ca

sudbury@jlrichards.ca

North Bay

Hawkesbury

Guelph

200-175 Progress Road North Bay ON Canada P1A 0B8 Tel: 705 495-7597

326 Bertha Street Hawkesbury ON Canada K6A 2A8 Tel: 613 632-0287

107-450 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph ON Canada N1H 7Y6 Tel: 519 763-0713

northbay@jlrichards.ca

hawkesbury@jlrichards.ca

guelph@jlrichards.ca

Tel: 705 360-1899 timmins@jlrichards.ca

JLR Logo is a Registered Trademark ® 2009, all rights are reserved

500 of 575 2019-117 Corporate Page Services County of Frontenac Asset Condition Assessme…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Report 2019-124 Information Report to Council To:

Warden and Members of County Council

From:

Kelly J. Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Megan Rueckwald, Manager of Community Planning

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Planning and Economic Development - Bill 108 - Changes to the Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act

Recommendation This report is for information purposes only. Background 

On May 2, 2019, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing released the “More Homes, More Choice: Ontario’s Housing Supply Action Plan”. As part of the Action Plan, the Province also tabled Bill 108 – More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019.



Bill 108 received Royal Assent on June 6, 2019 with only minor amendments to the proposed legislation. This introduced sweeping changes across 13 statutes, with the intention of cutting red tape, reducing costs, and increasing the supply of housing in Ontario. The vast majority of the changes proposed with were not put into effect on June 6, 2019.



On September 3, 2019, the Province proclaimed key amendments to the Planning Act and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017. These amendment included reduced timelines for processing Planning Act applications and restricted appeal rights with implications to Frontenac County.

Planning Act Amendments The proclamation on September 3, 2019, brought into force key amendments to the Planning Act that reform the development process.

Page 501 ofDevelopment 575 2019-124 Planning and Economic Bill 108 – Changes to the Pla…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Amendments as a result of Bill 108 that are relevant to Frontenac County and the Townships are as follows: 

Reducing planning decision timelines:    

Official Plans from 7 months (210 days) to 4 months (120 days); Zoning By-laws from 5 months (150 days) to 3 months (90 days); and Plans of Subdivision/Condominium from 6 months (180 days) to 4 months (120 days); (Please note that these time periods commence once a municipality deems an application to be complete in accordance with the Planning Act).



Authorizing additional residential units for detached, semi-detached, and row houses in both the primary dwelling and ancillary building structure; and



Enabling the Minister to require the community planning permit system (formerly known as development permit system) to be used in specified areas (e.g., major transit station areas and provincially significant employment zones), and removing appeal rights related to implementing documents.

Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act Amendments The proclamation on September 3, 2019, brought into force key amendments to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act that reform the planning appeals regime. 

Empowering the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (“LPAT”) to make its decision based on the best planning outcome, rather than consistency or conformity with higher order planning instruments including the Provincial Policy Statement;



Enabling the LPAT to make a final determination on appeals, rather than a recommendation back to Council;



Request for party status no longer needs to be made in writing 30 days before the proceeding;



Participants to a matter will only be able to make written submissions;



Limiting the examination or cross-examination of a witness if the Tribunal is satisfied that all matters relevant to the proceeding have been addressed;



Removing existing restrictions on a party’s ability to introduce evidence and call and examine witnesses at LPAT hearings; and



Limiting third party appeals of Plans of Subdivision/Condominium and approval authority non-decisions on Official Plans and Official Plan Amendments.

Information Report – Planning and Economic Development Bill 108 Amendments Page 2 of 4

Page 502 ofDevelopment 575 2019-124 Planning and Economic Bill 108 – Changes to the Pla…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

Implications for Frontenac The four member municipalities and the County of Frontenac are jointly undergoing a LEAN continuous improvement exercise for the planning and development review process. In order to increase awareness and understanding of the planning process, while also reducing confusion, frustration and processing delays a number of improvements have been identified and are being implemented. The County of Frontenac allocated funding from the Municipal Modernization Fund to retain an intern to assist with implementing improvements. However, in order to meet reduced timelines and limit appeals from non-decisions, additional resources may be required. At this time it is too early to know what the implications of the reduced timelines will be on planning staff capacity. However, improvements to the efficiency of the County and Townships planning process are expected as a result Lean Process Improvement Process that is reviewing the current Committee of Adjustment system for the Townships. With respect to the changes to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, third party appeals from members of the public/neighbours/residents with respect to Plans of Subdivisions or Plans of Condominium are no longer permitted. Government agencies and the applicant still have appeal rights for non-decisions (where no decision has been made within the timelines of the Planning Act) or to appeal a decision of the approval authority. Further, a regulation has been removed that required the Tribunal to send back a decision to the Council to review again in instances where the Tribunal found that the application was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conformed to the Official Plan(s). This is tied to the additional removal of the consistency/conformity test for zoning bylaw amendment applications and return to the “good planning” test that had previously been in place. Many of the regulations now in effect return the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal back to regulations that existed for the Ontario Municipal Board. Certain other amendments introduced through Bill 108 – including the replacement of Section 37 density bonusing with a new “Community Benefits Charge” and changes to the parkland dedication and development charges – have not come into force as of yet. Instead, these remaining amendments will be proclaimed on a future date yet to be determined. Comment Through Bill 108, More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019, the Province intends to locate efficiencies in the planning and development review process to reduce obstacles for developers and increase overall housing supply. Planning staff strive to educate and inform applicants through the planning process and review applications in a timely manner with provided resource capacity, but may not be able to achieve the timelines proposed with current staff capacity. Planning staff will keep Council apprised of future amendments proposed under Bill 108 including and resource capacity need to meet the objectives of the Province.

Information Report – Planning and Economic Development Bill 108 Amendments Page 3 of 4

Page 503 ofDevelopment 575 2019-124 Planning and Economic Bill 108 – Changes to the Pla…

AGENDA ITEM #b)

County of Frontenac Strategic Priority Implications Priority 1: Build community vitality and resilience. This priority includes refining and investing in efforts to accelerate economic development – to grow businesses, attract more visits and expand the tax base. Planning staff work closely with economic development staff with business expansion and attraction strategies as there is often a planning component with new and expanding businesses (e.g. rezoning or site plan control). Having staff capacity will ensure that timelines required under Bill 108 are met helping to make Frontenac a positive location to develop. Financial Implications There are no direct financial implications associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected The amendments to Bill 108 impact all municipalities in Ontario.

Information Report – Planning and Economic Development Bill 108 Amendments Page 4 of 4

Page 504 ofDevelopment 575 2019-124 Planning and Economic Bill 108 – Changes to the Pla…

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Report 2019-125 Council Information Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Jannette Amini, Manager of Legislative Services/Clerk

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) authorization to proceed with a Shared Administrative Facility and Work Plan update report

Recommendation This report is for information purposes only. Background In 2017 discussions began with the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) with respect to the construction of a potential joint administrative facility. Following several meetings and discussions by the Administrative Building Design Task Force, Council authorized staff to engage appropriate architectural services to validate initial assessments to enable the partners to make a decision on whether or not to pursue the next stage of a shared development project. This resulted in County Council, at its meeting held May 15, 2019, being presented with Report 2019-059 after which Council authorized staff to engage appropriate architectural expertise to review and determine the feasibility and costs to redevelop the County Administration Building to accommodate County of Frontenac and Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) Administrative staff to an upset of $10,000 to be expensed from the County’s Modernization Fund. Colbourne & Kembel, Architects Inc. was retained to carry out the facility analysis of the County Administrative Building, commonly referred to as “the old house”. The purpose of the analysis was to determine the feasibility and costs to redevelop the County Administration Building to accommodate County of Frontenac and CRCA Administrative staff.

Page of 575 Officer Cataraqui Region Con… 2019-125 Office of the Chief505 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #c)

At its regular meeting held September 18, 2019, Council approved the following resolution as recommended by the Administrative Building Design Task Force stemming from its meeting held July 17, 2019, that being Reports from Advisory Committees of Council, clause a): a)

Report of the Administrative Building Design Task Force

Motion #: 160-19

Moved By: Seconded By:

Councillor Vandewal Councillor Martin

Comment The Administrative Building Design Task Force met on September 18, 2019 following the County Council meeting. At that meeting, the CRCA advised the County that it wished to proceed with a joint administrative facility with the County of Frontenac. At that meeting, the Task Force directed staff to proceed with Phase #1 and #2 of the Work Plan as identified in Report 2019-116 and report back to the Administrative Building Design Task Force in December. This direction falls within the parameters of resolution No. 160-19 passed by Council at its September 18, 2019 regular meeting. The purpose of this report is to advise Council that the CRCA continues to proceed with a joint administrative facility with the County of Frontenac.

Information Report to Council Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority (CRCA) authorization to proceed with a Shared Administrative Facility and Work Plan update report October 16, 2019 Page 2 of 3

Page of 575 Officer Cataraqui Region Con… 2019-125 Office of the Chief506 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #c)

Strategic Priorities Priority 3: Champion and coordinate collaborative efforts with partners to resolve complex problems otherwise beyond the reach Specifically, the objectives that support this strategy states that the County will continue to pursue collaborative opportunities to achieve service and cost efficiencies and other economies through cost-sharing and shared services. This priority identifies the CRCA as a current and potential project partner. In addition, shared facilities reduce the overall environmental foot print required to occupy two separate facilities. Depending upon outcomes/options in terms of a shared facility, the overall greenhouse gas foot print of the County could be reduced as a result of this project, thereby assisting in meeting our GHG emission requirements as noted in the County’s Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan. Financial Implications There are no financial considerations associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected Susan Brant, Director of Corporate Services/Treasurer Kevin Farrell, Manager of Continuous Improvement

Page of 575 Officer Cataraqui Region Con… 2019-125 Office of the Chief507 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Report 2019-128 Council Information Report To:

Warden and Council

From:

Kelly Pender, Chief Administrative Officer

Prepared by:

Joe Gallivan, Director of Planning and Economic Development

Date of meeting:

October 16, 2019

Re:

Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019

Recommendation This report is for information purposes only. Background The 2019 Canadian Infrastructure Report Card (CIRC) was produced by FCM along with seven partner organizations. The CIRC examines the state of Canada’s public infrastructure and offers an objective look at the state of core public infrastructure across Canada. This year’s report provides a timely update on all core public infrastructure asset categories: roads and bridges; culture, recreation and sports facilities; potable water; wastewater; stormwater; public transit; and solid waste. A copy of the Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019 is attached to this report as Appendix A. Comment The CIRC report comes in a timely manner as the Frontenac CAO’s commence discussions on regional roads. As Council will recall, the County of Frontenac has engaged KPMG Canada to complete an option analysis and business plan for consideration by County Council as part of the 2020 County Budget with respect to Regional Roads. The development of the business plan will include consultation with each Council.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief508 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Among the key findings of the CIRC are: Roads and Bridges The road networks section of the CIRC survey focused on two-lane equivalent kilometres of highways, arterial roads, collector roads, local roads, lanes, alleys and sidewalks. The survey also included questions about bridges and tunnels, including highway and expressway bridges, arterial bridges, collector bridges, footbridges, local bridges, culverts three metres and greater and tunnels. The report found that almost 40% of these assets are in fair or worse condition and only 20% of the assets were constructed in the last 20 years. It assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile as follows:   

Roads Estimated Service Life (ESL) of 20-40 years. Sidewalks ESL of 50 years. Bridges and culverts ESL of 50 years.

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities The survey included the following types of culture, recreation and sport facilities:    

Ice arena facilities: Indoor ice arenas with 1-5 pads or more, outdoor ice arenas. Pool facilities: Indoor pools of 25 metres or 50 metres or more, leisure pools, outdoor pools, wading pools, splash pads. Arts and culture facilities: Galleries, libraries, museums and archives, presentation and performance spaces. Other facilities: Indoor and outdoor skate parks, indoor curling rinks, indoor and outdoor stadiums, indoor and outdoor tennis courts, indoor and outdoor sports fields, community centres, multi-purpose facilities

These assets have a consistent condition across this category. Approximately 30-35% of them are in fair condition or worse, and a large proportion of some facility types are more than 50 years old. The asset classes in the worst condition (i.e., more than 30% are in fair, poor or very poor condition) include single pad ice arenas, outdoor pools and wading pools, indoor 25-metre pools, indoor curling rinks and tennis courts. Potable Water Approximately 30% of potable water infrastructure is in very good condition, 40% is in good condition and 25% is in fair, poor or very poor condition. Approximately 30-40% of these assets were constructed in the last 20 years. Wastewater Approximately 25% of wastewater infrastructure is in very good condition and 30-40% is in good condition. These positive results represent approximately 55-65% of wastewater assets. That said, approximately 15% of linear wastewater assets have an unknown condition, which highlights the challenges in assessing underground assets. A large portion of linear wastewater assets are more than 50 years old. Information Report to Council Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019 October 16, 2019

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief509 Administrative

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #d)

Stormwater Approximately 40-60% of stormwater infrastructure is in good or very good condition. Stormwater management assets were largely built in the last 20 years, and there is a growing focus on understanding their future rehabilitation/replacement needs. The state of stormwater infrastructure is particularly critical given the impact of climate change as jurisdictions across Canada are experiencing longer and more intense precipitation events. This has highlighted capacity issues in stormwater infrastructure that go above and beyond the need to rehabilitate existing assets. Strategic Priorities Priority 2: Explore new funding sources and invest wisely in critical long-term infrastructure 2.5

.Explore new funding sources and invest wisely in critical long-term infrastructure.

Financial Implications There are no financial considerations associated with this report. Organizations, Departments and Individuals Consulted and/or Affected

Information Report to Council Office of the Chief Administrative Officer – Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019 October 16, 2019

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief510 Administrative

Page 3 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019 Monitoring the State of Canada’s Core Public Infrastructure

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief511 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

he 2019 Canada Infrastructure Report Card is a collective effort produced by the following organizations: The Association of Consulting Engineering Companies Canada (ACEC), the Canadian Construction Association (CCA), the Canadian Parks and Recreation Association (CPRA), the Canadian Public Works Association (CPWA), the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE), the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), the Canadian Network of Asset Managers (CNAM), and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). BluePlan Engineering was responsible for preparing the technical report. Design and layout was provided by Actual Media.

For more information on this Report Card, or the project, please contact infrastructure@fcm.ca Monitoring the State of Canada’s Core Public Infrastructure: The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card 2019. © All rights reserved. Ce document est aussi disponible sous le titre Suivi de l’état des infrastructures publiques essentielles du Canada : Bulletin de rendement des infrastructures canadiennes de 2019

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief512 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

METHODOLOGY

KEY MESSAGES

ASSET MANAGEMENT

COMPARISON WITH THE 2016 CIRC RESULTS

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY 17

Roads and Bridges

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities

Potable Water

Wastewater

Stormwater

Public Transit

Solid Waste

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief513 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

e are proud to introduce this third iteration of the Canadian Infrastructure Report Card (CIRC) to our national infrastructure conversation. The CIRC offers an objective look at the state of core public infrastructure across Canada.

Public infrastructure gets people and goods moving, provides safe drinking water, handles our waste, creates spaces for sport and recreation, and helps protect our homes against flooding and other natural disasters. It is the foundation that the daily life of Canadians is built upon. The strength of this foundation enables our communities and local businesses to grow, and ensures Canadians have a high quality of life. This year’s report provides a timely update on the state of Canada’s public infrastructure across all core public infrastructure asset categories: roads and bridges; culture, recreation and sports facilities; potable water; wastewater; stormwater; public transit; and solid waste. It finds that the state of our infrastructure is at risk, which should be cause for concern for all Canadians. In order to change course, Canada’s public infrastructure will require significant attention in the coming decades. The evidence for the poor state of Canada’s infrastructure comes from the voluntary and federally administered Canadian Core Public Infrastructure Survey (CCPIS). Responses to the CCPIS provide the foundational performance measurement data on the state of Canada’s public infrastructure. The questions align with those used to create the 2012 and 2016 CIRC. This facilitates a direct comparison and gives us an exceptional view of the state of our assets over time. The CIRC partner organizations applaud the federal government, and in particular Infrastructure Canada and Statistics Canada, for initiating the CCPIS and committing to continue to deliver the survey in future years. It is a robust data set, and one that infrastructure professionals across the country can rely on as they make decisions about the assets in their communities. We were pleased to see a strong response rate for the CCPIS. When the federal government issued the survey to public infrastructure agencies across Canada in 2017, it received responses from 90% of the approximately 2,000 invited jurisdictions that own and manage public infrastructure. This doubles the population represented in the 2016 CIRC survey, with almost 15 times as many municipalities represented. Given the CIRC’s importance to the national infrastructure conversation, we streamlined this year’s report for ease of use. When we issued the 2016 CIRC, stakeholders were clear about which features they found most helpful. We listened to their feedback and designed this lean report, which highlights the most important elements of the state of Canada’s infrastructure. Future CIRC publications will use a similar approach.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief514 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the interest of making the CIRC results more accessible and useful, users can now benchmark communities against similar municipalities across the country. We believe that delivering the data in this innovative way helps infrastructure stakeholders meaningfully engage with the CCPIS results. It has always been important to the organizations involved in the CIRC to root our approach in reporting only the facts as provided by survey respondents. This separates the CIRC from other national report cards around the world in which the facts are combined with advocacy positions intended to influence infrastructure policy. This is not our intent. The analysis in this report presents only a summary of the information reported by infrastructure agencies. CIRC 2019 provides stakeholders across the country with the evidence and analysis they need to have meaningful discussions about the state of Canada’s infrastructure.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief515 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

METHODOLOGY

Leveraging the CCPIS Survey Data The Canadian Core Public Infrastructure Survey (CCPIS) was issued in 2017 to municipalities and captured year-end 2016 data. The data was collected and analyzed by Statistics Canada before being released in stages during the second half of 2018. Our CIRC group then compiled the published CCPIS data and analyzed it to produce the graphs and tables contained in this report. We will develop future CIRCs based on subsequent versions of the survey administered by Statistics Canada. There is ongoing dialogue between CIRC representatives and Infrastructure Canada and Statistics Canada to enhance the survey and the resultant data.

Quality of Data As the CCPIS was the first iteration of what we expect to be many surveys capturing similar or related data from communities, it is important to note that survey questions, categories and measures can change periodically to improve the accuracy and data quality. The facilitation of a pan-Canadian survey of communities is a complex venture and everyone involved recognizes that adjustments to the methodology and survey need to occur as the process evolves.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief516 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

METHODOLOGY Lack of Financial Data Statistics Canada determined that it was not appropriate to release the financial data collected through the CCPIS due to data integrity issues. This includes the replacement value and the planned investment/expenditure levels for each asset portfolio. The lack of replacement value data limits our ability to produce some of the analysis found in the 2016 CIRC. For example, the CCPIS data provides the breakdown of the percentage of water treatment facilities, water reservoirs, and water pumping stations in various conditions (i.e., very poor, poor, fair, good, very good, unknown). We would need the total replacement value of these asset portfolios in order to calculate a weighted overall condition for all non-linear potable water assets. The lack of planned investment/expenditure data prevents us from publishing reinvestment rates. Reinvestment rates are an indicator of how the current state of the infrastructure systems is expected to change in the coming years. We intend to report on reinvestment rates in future iterations of the CIRC.

Increased Accuracy and Precision of Responses: Data subdivided by population, province and urban/rural municipalities As a result of the methodology used in the CCPIS, we can now report the results by the population of each municipality, urban or rural classification and by province/territory. This reporting dramatically improves the ability of infrastructure stakeholders in a community to compare themselves against an appropriate peer group from across the country.

The Addition of Publicly Owned and Municipally Owned Infrastructure The CCPIS includes the results of all publicly owned infrastructure at a national level. Publicly owned infrastructure is a broad classification that includes the assets owned by regional governments, provincial/territorial governments and other infrastructure agencies that are not considered a municipality. The publicly owned infrastructure data is reported at a national level, as well as by province/territory. Municipally owned infrastructure is a subset of publicly owned infrastructure, being only the infrastructure owned by infrastructure agencies officially classified as a ‘municipality’. This infrastructure is subdivided by municipality size, urban/rural classification and province. The inclusion of publicly owned infrastructure builds on the CIRC’s momentum and makes it a more comprehensive review of all public infrastructure systems that provide services to our communities.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief517 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

METHODOLOGY A Consistent Condition Rating Scale The methodology in the CCPIS used a condition rating scale that is consistent with previous CIRC publications. This increases the comparability of the data over time, but as noted above, the 2019 CIRC is based on dramatically higher response rates, which limits the direct comparability to the 2016 or 2012 CIRC. This is the condition rating scale used in the CCPIS: ● Very poor: The asset is unfit for sustained service. It is near or beyond its expected service life and shows widespread signs of advanced deterioration. Some assets may be unusable. ● Poor: There is an increasing potential for its condition to affect the service it provides. The asset is approaching the end of its service life, the condition is below the standard and a large portion of the system exhibits significant deterioration. ● Fair: The asset requires attention. The asset shows signs of deterioration and some elements exhibit deficiencies. ● Good: The asset is adequate. It is acceptable and generally within the mid-stage of its expected service life. ● Very Good: The asset is fit for the future. It is well maintained, in good condition, new or recently rehabilitated. ● Unknown: Not enough data exists to respond. Although the survey respondents were asked to identify the current state of their assets using this rating scale, it is important to note that the survey did not include subject matter-specific references for the condition rating of each asset category (i.e., Building Condition Index for facilities, pavement Quality Index values for roads). The survey results provided by each jurisdiction represent the perspective of whomever completed the survey against the rating scale provided above.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief518 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

KEY MESSAGES

concerning amount of municipal infrastructure is in poor or very poor condition. Infrastructure in this condition represents an immediate need for action, as the rehabilitation or replacement of these assets is required in the next 5-10 years to ensure that the services it provides continue to meet the community’s expectations. An even larger proportion of municipal infrastructure is in fair condition. Infrastructure in this condition represents a view of things to come in the medium to long term. This infrastructure will continue to deteriorate over the next decade, falling into poor and very poor condition if rehabilitation or replacement actions are not taken.

Figure 1: Core Infrastructure Asset Condition Summary 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20%

Roads and Bridges

Culture and Recreation Very Poor

Poor

Portable Water

Wastewater

Fair

Good

Stormwater Very Good

Tracks/Roads

Fixed Assests

Rolling Assets

Non-Linear

Linear

Non-Linear

Linear

Non-Linear

Linear

Other Facilities

Arts and Culture

Arenas and Pools

Bridges

Roads

10%

Solid Waste

Public Transit Unknown

The report also highlights that a majority of the infrastructure that Canadian’s rely on every day is more than 20 years old. This finding emphasizes the need for continued reinvestment in existing infrastructure alongside construction of new assets.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief519 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

KEY MESSAGES Roads, Bridges and Tunnels There are enough Canadian roads in poor condition to build a road almost halfway to the moon. Asset Category

Subcategory

And % in Poor/Very

Poor Condition

And % in Fair

Condition

Roads, Bridges, and Tunnels

Roads

146,255 km (16.4%)

201,283 km (22.6%)

Bridges and Tunnels

9,661 Structures (12.4%)

20,502 Structures (26.3%)

Culture and Recreation Facilities One in three recreational or cultural facilities require investment in the next decade. This does not include the programmatic or functional deficiencies they may need to enhance their relevance and use. Asset Category

Culture and Recreation

Subcategory

And % in Poor/Very

Poor Condition

And % in Fair

Condition

Ice Arenas/Pools

564 Facilities (12.7%)

883 Facilities (19.8%)

Arts and Culture Facilities

380 Facilities (8.6%)

721 Facilities (16%)

Other Facilities

1,886 Facilities (8.6%)

4,972 Facilities (22.7%)

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief520 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

KEY MESSAGES

Potable Water, Wastewater and Stormwater ● Of our linear assets (e.g., watermains, sewers), 30% are in fair or worse condition. ● Climate change puts an additional strain on these infrastructure systems. Asset Category Potable Water

Wastewater

Stormwater

Subcategory

And % in Poor/Very

Poor Condition

And % in Fair

Condition

Linear Infrastructure

17,788 km (9.6%)

32,641 km (17.7%)

Non-linear Infrastructure

573 Facilities (6.4%)

1,333 Facilities (15%)

Linear Infrastructure

16,350 km (10.8%)

26,211 km (17.3%)

Non-linear Infrastructure

1,386 Facilities (10%)

2,896 Facilities (20.6%)

Linear Infrastructure

50,251 km (11.3%)

84,614 km (19%)

Non-linear Infrastructure

700 Facilities (4.4%)

1,866 Facilities (11.8%)

Public Transit More than 30% of tracks require investment in the next decade. Asset Category

Public Transit

Subcategory

And % in Poor/Very

Poor Condition

And % in Fair

Condition

Rolling assets

604 Units (2.7%)

6,751 Units (30%)

Fixed assets

2,298 Facilities (7.8%)

3,207 Facilities (11%)

Roads/Tracks

1,367 km (15.8%)

1,343 km (15.5%)

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief521 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

KEY MESSAGES Solid Waste One in four transfer stations require investment in the next decade. Asset Category

Solid Waste

Subcategory

And % in Poor/Very

Poor Condition

And % in Fair

Condition

Transfer Station

89 Facilities (7.5%)

193 Facilities (16%)

Waste Diversion

27 Facilities (3.7%)

86 Facilities (11.6%)

Waste Disposal

111 Facilities (7%)

326 Facilities (15.7%)

Figure 2: Example of asset deterioration curve (Roads) RATING: 100%

EXCELLENT

Spending $1 on preservation here…

40% Drop in Quality

GOOD

75% of Life

FAIR

…eliminates or delays spending $6 to $10 on rehabillitation or reconstruction here.

POOR 40% Drop in Quality 20%

VERY POOR 12% of Life

FAILED 0

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief522 Administrative

AGE

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

ASSET MANAGEMENT Asset management (AM) is a strategic approach to managing infrastructure assets that helps infrastructure owners (e.g. municipalities) maintain and operate infrastructure effectively so that critical services can be provided to the public. Asset Management Plans (AMP) lay out how a group of assets is to be managed over a period of time. The AMP describes the characteristics and condition of infrastructure assets, the level of service expected from them, planned actions to ensure the assets are providing the expected level of service, and financing strategies to implement the planned actions. Similar to previous CIRCs, the CCPIS included questions about the state of asset management practices in each jurisdiction. One of the most revealing questions was whether the infrastructure owner has an Asset Management Plan (AMP). That plan is important because it is the functional report that they use to understand the state of their infrastructure assets and plan the lifecycle expenditures required to sustain those assets. There is a notable variation in who has a documented AMP, depending on their population size. Only 29% of small municipalities (i.e., less than 5,000 people) reported a documented AMP. Of medium-sized municipalities (i.e., 5,000-30,000 people) 56% reported a documented AMP and 70% of large municipalities (i.e., 30,000 people or more) reported a documented AMP. Asset management is still relatively new in Canada, and asset management capacity is growing. The survey results highlight the increasing adoption of AM in larger municipalities, while also reminding us of the need to continue supporting smaller municipalities with funding and technical support to adopt AM practices. AM capacity is in part being enhanced through the Municipal Asset Management Program (MAMP), which is funded by Infrastructure Canada and delivered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). The program’s mandate is to increase awareness of AM and develop technical AM expertise at the local level. MAMP programming is delivered through a number of partner organizations including the Canadian Network of Asset Managers (CNAM), the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), NAMS Canada, Centre d’expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines (CERIU), and the Atlantic Infrastructure Management (AIM) Network. The 2019 federal budget increased funding for the program, extending it to March 2024.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief523 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

ASSET MANAGEMENT Figure 3: Municipal Organizations with Documented Asset Management Plan (Municipalities with up to 5,000 people)

71%

29%

Figure 5: Municipal Organizations with Documented Asset Management Plan (Municipalities with 30,000 or more people)

30%

Figure 4: Municipal Organizations with Documented Asset Management Plan (Municipalities with 5,000 to 30,000 people)

44%

56%

Figure 6: Public Organizations with Documented Asset Management Plan

70%

62%

38%

Organization has a documented asset management plan Organization does not have a documented asset management plan

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief524 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

COMPARISON WITH THE 2016 CIRC RESULTS Each asset category (except solid waste, a new category) has a side-by-side comparison of the condition profile reported in the 2016 CIRC against the 2019 results. Use a degree of caution when drawing conclusions from the comparison, for two reasons: ● We used a significantly larger sample size used to generate the 2019 CIRC. ● It was challenging to calculate the overall condition profiles in each asset category given the lack of replacement value data. Notwithstanding these considerations, a comparison of the 2016 and 2019 results suggests the following: ● The 2016 CIRC results are generally consistent with the 2019 results. Despite the small 2016 CIRC sample size, the overall condition profile of each asset category is generally consistent with the 2016 CIRC and 2019 CIRC results. We can conclude that the 2016 CIRC presented an accurate overall view of the state of Canada’s core infrastructure. ● The CIRC and the CCPIS data give us the ability to compare how the state of infrastructure changes over time. The best policy is informed by an analysis of high-quality data, and the CIRC provides unbiased facts that support these national infrastructure conversations. We noted several trends: • The 2019 results indicate that some asset categories have a worse condition profile than what was reported in 2016 (i.e., roads, bridges, wastewater, linear stormwater). • The 2019 results indicate that some asset categories have a better condition profile than what was report in 2016 (i.e., water, non-linear stormwater, culture and recreation facilities, transit). • In 2019, we included solid waste assets in the CIRC for the first time. It is too early to draw conclusions about the impact of infrastructure policy or funding on the state of infrastructure systems. Infrastructure is a naturally slow sector as complex infrastructure can require several years to plan, design and construct. Infrastructure agencies can take months to update their infrastructure data to reflect an asset’s new condition. For these reasons, we will need additional iterations of the CCPIS and CIRC before we can provide the data points necessary to identify trends and connect them to implemented infrastructure policy.

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief525 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief526 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY ROADS AND BRIDGES The road networks section of our survey focused on two-lane equivalent kilometres of highways, arterial roads, collector roads, local roads, lanes, alleys and sidewalks. The survey also included questions about bridges and tunnels, including highway and expressway bridges, arterial bridges, collector bridges, footbridges, local bridges, culverts three metres and greater and tunnels.

Roads and Bridges: Road Asset Inventory 500,000 450,000 400,000

Kilometres

350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0

Arterial roads

Collector roads

Highways

Lanes and alleys

Local roads

Sidewalks

Roads and Bridges: Bridge and Tunnel Assets Inventory 35,000 30,000

Units

25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0

Arterial bridges

Collector bridges

Culverts Footbridges (diameter >= 3 metres) Publicly owned assets

Highway/expressway Local bridges bridges

Tunnels

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief527 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE Almost 40% of these assets are in fair or worse condition and only 20% of the assets were constructed in the last 20 years. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. ● Roads Estimated Service Life (ESL) of 20-40 years. ● Sidewalks ESL of 50 years. ● Bridges and culverts ESL of 50 years.

Roads and Bridges: Publicly Owned Road Asset Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial roads

Collector roads

Highways

Lanes and alleys

Local roads

Sidewalks

Roads and Bridges: Publicly Owned Bridge and Tunnel Assets Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial bridges

Collector bridges

Footbridges Culverts (diameter >= 3 metres)

Highway/expressway bridges

Local bridges

Tunnels

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief528 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Roads and Bridges: Overall Asset Condition – Roads

Roads and Bridges: Overall Asset Condition – Bridges and Tunnels

11%

18%

10%

3% 9%

16% 26%

22% 42%

35%

Roads and Bridges: Comparison with 2016 Results

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Roads

Bridges

Roads

2016 CIRC

Very Poor

Bridges

2019 CIRC

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief529 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Roads and Bridges: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Road Asset Condition 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial roads

Collector roads

Highways

Lanes and alleys

Local roads

Sidewalks

Roads and Bridges: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Bridge and Tunnel Assets Inventory 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial bridges

Collector bridges

Very Poor

Footbridges Culverts (diameter >= 3 metres) Poor

Fair

Highway/expressway bridges

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief530 Administrative

Very Good

Local bridges

Tunnels

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Roads and Bridges: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Road Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial roads

Collector roads

Highways

Lanes and alleys

Local roads

Sidewalks

Roads and Bridges: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Road Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial roads

Collector roads Very Poor

Highways Poor

Fair

Lanes and alleys Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief531 Administrative

Local roads Very Good

Sidewalks Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Roads and Bridges: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Bridge and Tunnel Assets (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial bridges

Collector bridges

Footbridges Culverts (diameter >= 3 metres)

Highway/expressway bridges

Local bridges

Tunnels

Roads and Bridges: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Bridge and Tunnel Assets (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Arterial bridges

Collector bridges

Very Poor

Footbridges Culverts (diameter >= 3 metres) Poor

Fair

Highway/expressway bridges

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief532 Administrative

Very Good

Local bridges

Tunnels

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY CULTURE, RECREATION AND SPORTS FACILITIES Our survey included several types of culture, recreation and sport facilities: ● Ice arena facilities: Indoor ice arenas with 1-5 pads or more, outdoor ice arenas. ● Pool facilities: Indoor pools of 25 metres or 50 metres or more, leisure pools, outdoor pools, wading pools, splash pads. ● Arts and culture facilities: Galleries, libraries, museums and archives, presentation and performance spaces. ● Other facilities: Indoor and outdoor skate parks, indoor curling rinks, indoor and outdoor stadiums, indoor and outdoor tennis courts, indoor and outdoor sports fields, community centres, multi-purpose facilities.

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Asset Inventory 18,000 16,000 14,000

Units

12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

Publicly owned assets

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief533 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Indoor sports fields

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor tennis courts

Outdoor stadiums

Indoor stadiums

Indoor curling rinks

Indoor skate parks

Splash pads

Wading pools

Indoor pools, leisure pools

Indoor pools, 50 metres or longer

Indoor pools, 25 metres

Indoor ice arenas, 5 pads or more

Indoor ice arenas, 4 pads

Indoor ice arenas, 2 or 3 pads

Indoor ice arenas, single pad

Outdoor sports fields

Outdoor skate parks

Community centres (senior and youth centres)

Presentation and performance spaces

Museums and archives

Libraries

Galleries

Outdoor pools

Outdoor ice arenas

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE These assets have a consistent condition across this category. Approximately 30-35% of them are in fair condition or worse, and a large proportion of some facility types are more than 50 years old. The asset classes in the worst condition (i.e., more than 30% are in fair, poor or very poor condition) include single pad ice arenas, outdoor pools and wading pools, indoor 25-metre pools, indoor curling rinks and tennis courts. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. This asset category is complicated given the public’s expectations around criteria unrelated to a facility’s physical condition. This includes, for example, revised amenity requirements as demographics shift, and updating facilities for better environmental/energy performance, etc. These are important considerations that are not fully captured in traditional condition assessment data. ● Sports fields and courts ESL of 25 years. ● Playgrounds and other park equipment ESL of 10-15 years depending on the equipment, and playground structures 25-50 years depending on material. ● Asphalt trails and parking lots ESL of 25 years. ● Buildings and structures ESL of 40 years (before they need some substantial refurbishment).

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief534 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief535 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Indoor sports fields

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor tennis courts

Outdoor stadiums

Indoor stadiums

Indoor curling rinks

Indoor skate parks

Splash pads

Wading pools

Indoor pools, leisure pools

Indoor pools, 50 metres or longer

Indoor pools, 25 metres

Indoor ice arenas, 5 pads or more

Indoor ice arenas, 4 pads

Indoor ice arenas, 2 or 3 pads

Indoor ice arenas, single pad

Outdoor sports fields

Outdoor skate parks

Community centres (senior and youth centres)

Presentation and performance spaces

Museums and archives

Libraries

Galleries

Outdoor pools

Outdoor ice arenas

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Publicly Owned Asset Inventory (Completed Construction)

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Completed construction prior to 1940 Completed construction 1940 to 1969 Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009 Completed construction 2010 to 2015 Completed construction 2016

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Overall Asset Condition – Ice Arenas and Pools

10%

Very Poor Poor

Fair

Very Good

Good Unknown

19%

28%

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Overall Asset Condition – Arts and Culture Facilities

30%

2% 8%

7% 16%

30% Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Overall Asset Condition – Other Facilities

37%

3% 7%

23%

37%

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief536 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Very Poor

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief537 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Outdoor sports fields

Indoor sports fields

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor tennis courts

Outdoor stadiums

Arts and culture facilities 2019 CIRC

Indoor stadiums

Indoor curling rinks

Outdoor skate parks

1Indoor skate parks

Community centres (senior and youth centres)

Ice arenas & pools

Presentation and performance spaces

Museums and archives

Libraries

Galleries

2016 CIRC

Splash pads

Wading pools

Outdoor pools

Indoor pools, leisure pools

Indoor pools, 50 metres or longer

Indoor pools, 25 metres

Outdoor ice arenas

Indoor ice arenas, 5 pads or more

Indoor ice arenas, 4 pads

Indoor ice arenas, 2 or 3 pads

Indoor ice arenas, single pad

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Comparison with 2016 Results

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Other facilities

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Asset Condition

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Very Poor Poor Fair Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief538 Administrative Very Good Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Outdoor sports fields

Indoor sports fields

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor tennis courts

Outdoor stadiums

Indoor stadiums

Indoor curling rinks

Outdoor skate parks

Indoor skate parks

Community centres (senior and youth centres)

Presentation and performance spaces

Museums and archives

Libraries

Galleries

Splash pads

Wading pools

Outdoor pools

Indoor pools, leisure pools

Indoor pools, 50 metres or longer

Indoor pools, 25 metres

Outdoor ice arenas

Indoor ice arenas, 5 pads or more

Indoor ice arenas, 4 pads

Indoor ice arenas, 2 or 3 pads

Indoor ice arenas, single pad

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities)

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Very Poor Poor Fair Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief539 Administrative Very Good Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Outdoor sports fields

Indoor sports fields

Outdoor tennis courts

Indoor tennis courts

Outdoor stadiums

Indoor stadiums

Indoor curling rinks

Outdoor skate parks

1Indoor skate parks

Community centres (senior and youth centres)

Presentation and performance spaces

Museums and archives

Libraries

Galleries

Splash pads

Wading pools

Outdoor pools

Indoor pools, leisure pools

Indoor pools, 50 metres or longer

Indoor pools, 25 metres

Outdoor ice arenas

Indoor ice arenas, 5 pads or more

Indoor ice arenas, 4 pads

Indoor ice arenas, 2 or 3 pads

Indoor ice arenas, single pad

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Culture, Recreation and Sports Facilities: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities)

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY POTABLE WATER The potable water infrastructure assets in our survey included the linear portion of drinking water systems (i.e., local water and transmission pipes) and non-linear assets (i.e., water treatment facilities, water pumping stations, water reservoirs). Linear water infrastructure is classified into local water pipes—known as distribution pipes—and transmission pipes.

Potable Water: Linear Asset Inventory 180,000 160,000 140,000

Kilometres

120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0

Local water pipes (diameter < 416 mm)

Transmission pipes (diameter >= 416 mm)

Potable Water: Non-linear Asset Inventory 3,500 3,000

Units

2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0

Water treatment facilities

Storage tanks after intake not part of a treatment plant

Water pump stations

Publicly owned assets

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief540 Administrative

Water reservoirs (including dams) before intake

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE Overall, approximately 30% of potable water infrastructure is in very good condition, 40% is in good condition and 25% is in fair, poor or very poor condition. Approximately 30-40% of these assets were constructed in the last 20 years. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. ● Watermains have an ESL of 70-100 years depending on the material. ● Vertical facilities have an ESL of 50-80 years for structural components, 25 years for mechanical and electrical components.

Potable Water: Publicly Owned Asset Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Water treatment facilities

Storage tanks after intake not part of a treatment plant

Water pump stations

Water reservoirs (including dams) before intake

Local water pipes (diameter < 416 mm)

Transmission pipes (diameter

= 416 mm)

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief541 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Potable Water: Overall Asset Condition – Linear

Potable Water: Overall Asset Condition – Non-linear

15%

18%

31%

33%

36%

41%

Potable Water: Comparison with 2016 Results

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Linear

2016 CIRC

Very Poor

Non-linear

2019 CIRC

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief542 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Potable Water: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Assets 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Water treatment facilities

Storage tanks after intake not part of a treatment plant Very Poor

Poor

Water pump stations

Fair

Water reservoirs (including dams) before intake Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief543 Administrative

Local water pipes (diameter < 416 mm) Very Good

Transmission pipes (diameter

= 416 mm)

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Potable Water: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Assets (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Water treatment facilities

Storage tanks after intake not part of a treatment plant

Water pump stations

Water reservoirs (including dams) before intake

Local water pipes (diameter < 416 mm)

Transmission pipes (diameter

= 416 mm)

Potable Water: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Assets (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Water treatment facilities

Storage tanks after intake not part of a treatment plant Very Poor

Poor

Water pump stations Fair

Water reservoirs (including dams) before intake Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief544 Administrative

Local water pipes (diameter < 416 mm) Very Good

Transmission pipes (diameter

= 416 mm)

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY WASTEWATER The wastewater infrastructure assets in our survey included linear wastewater collection systems (i.e., sewer pipes and sanitary force mains) and non-linear assets (i.e., treatment plants, lagoon systems, pumping stations, lift stations and storage tanks).

Wastewater: Linear Asset Inventory 140,000 120,000

Kilometres

100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0

Sewer pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Sewer pipes (diameter >= 1,500 mm)

Sewer pipes (diameter >= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

Sanitary forcemains

Wastewater: Non-linear Asset Inventory 7,000 6,000

Units

5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0

Wastewater treatment plants (includes sludge handling plants)

Lagoon systems

Wastewater pump stations

Publicly owned assets

Wastewater lift stations

Wastewater storage tanks

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief545 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE Approximately 25% of wastewater infrastructure is in very good condition and 30-40% is in good condition. These positive results represent approximately 55-65% of wastewater assets. That said, approximately 15% of linear wastewater assets have an unknown condition, which highlights the challenges in assessing underground assets. A large portion of linear wastewater assets are more than 50 years old. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. ● Sewers have an ESL of 70-100 years depending on the material. ● Vertical facilities have an ESL of 50-80 years for structural components, 25 years for mechanical and electrical components.

Wastewater: Publicly Owned Asset Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Wastewater treatment plants (includes sludge handling plants)

Lagoon systems

Wastewater pump stations

Wastewater lift stations

Wastewater storage tanks

Sewer pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Sewer pipes Sewer pipes (diameter (diameter

= 450 mm to >= 1,500 mm) < 1,500 mm)

Sanitary forcemains

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief546 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Wastewater: Overall Asset Condition – Linear

Wastewater: Overall Asset Condition – Non-linear

3% 7%

15%

25%

17%

21%

26% 31%

40%

Wastewater: Comparison with 2016 Results

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Linear

2016 CIRC

Very Poor

Non-linear

2019 CIRC

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief547 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Wastewater: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Asset Condition 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Wastewater treatment plants (includes sludge handling plants)

Lagoon systems

Very Poor

Wastewater pump stations

Poor

Wastewater lift stations

Fair

Wastewater storage tanks

Sewer pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief548 Administrative

Sewer pipes Sewer pipes (diameter (diameter

= 450 mm to >= 1,500 mm) < 1,500 mm)

Very Good

Sanitary forcemains

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Wastewater: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Wastewater treatment plants (includes sludge handling plants)

Lagoon systems

Wastewater pump stations

Wastewater lift stations

Wastewater storage tanks

Sewer pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Sewer pipes Sewer pipes (diameter (diameter

= 450 mm to >= 1,500 mm) < 1,500 mm)

Sanitary forcemains

Wastewater: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Wastewater treatment plants (includes sludge handling plants)

Lagoon systems

Very Poor

Wastewater pump stations Poor

Wastewater lift stations

Fair

Wastewater storage tanks

Sewer pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief549 Administrative

Sewer pipes Sewer pipes (diameter (diameter

= 450 mm to >= 1,500 mm) < 1,500 mm)

Very Good

Sanitary forcemains

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY STORMWATER The stormwater infrastructure assets in our survey included linear stormwater collection systems (i.e., storm water collection pipes, open ditches and culverts less than three meters in diameter) and non-linear assets (i.e., stormwater drainage pump stations; stormwater management facilities, including stormwater management ponds, storm water wetlands and all other permitted end-of-pipe-facilities).

Stormwater: Linear Asset Inventory 300,000 250,000

Kilometres

200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0

Culverts (diameter < 3 metres)

Open ditches

Stormwater pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Stormwater pipes (diameter >= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

Stormwater pipes (diameter >= 1,500 mm)

Stormwater: Non-linear Asset Inventory 9,000 8,000 7,000

Units

6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0

Stormwater drainage pump stations

Stormwater management facilities, stormwater management ponds and stormwater wetlands Publicly owned assets

Stormwater management facilities all other permitted, end-of-pipe facilities

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief550 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE Approximately 40-60% of stormwater infrastructure is in good or very good condition. We don’t know the condition of a large portion of stormwater assets because historically, collecting data about their condition was a low-priority activity. Stormwater management assets were largely built in the last 20 years, and there is a growing focus on understanding their future rehabilitation/replacement needs. The state of stormwater infrastructure is particularly critical given the impact of climate change. Jurisdictions across Canada are experiencing longer and more intense precipitation events. This has highlighted capacity issues in stormwater infrastructure that go above and beyond the need to rehabilitate existing assets. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. ● Sewers and culverts have an ESL of 70-100 years depending on the material. ● Vertical facilities have an ESL of 50-80 years for structural components, 25 years for mechanical and electrical components. ● ESL of new types of stormwater management facilities is still TBD by the industry.

Stormwater: Publicly Owned Asset Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Culverts Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater management (diameter drainage pump management stations facilities, stormwater facilities all < 3 metres) management ponds other permitted, end-of-pipe and stormwater facilities wetlands

Open ditches

Stormwater pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Stormwater pipes (diameter

= 1,500 mm)

Stormwater pipes (diameter

= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief551 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Stormwater: Overall Asset Condition – Linear

Stormwater: Overall Asset Condition – Non-linear

3% 12%

24%

29%

19% 13%

34% 20%

32%

Stormwater: Comparison with 2016 Results

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Linear

2016 CIRC

Very Poor

Non-linear

2019 CIRC

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief552 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Stormwater: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Asset Condition 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater management drainage pump management stations facilities, stormwater facilities all management ponds other permitted, end-of-pipe and stormwater facilities wetlands

Culverts (diameter < 3 metres)

Open ditches

Stormwater pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Stormwater pipes (diameter

= 1,500 mm)

Very Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Unknown

Poor

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief553 Administrative

Stormwater pipes (diameter

= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Stormwater: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater management management drainage pump facilities, stormwater facilities all stations management ponds other permitted, and stormwater end-of-pipe wetlands facilities

Culverts (diameter < 3 metres)

Open ditches

Stormwater pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Stormwater Stormwater pipes pipes (diameter (diameter

= 1,500 mm) >= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

Stormwater: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater management management drainage pump facilities, stormwater facilities all stations management ponds other permitted, and stormwater end-of-pipe wetlands facilities Very Poor

Poor

Culverts (diameter < 3 metres)

Fair

Open ditches

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief554 Administrative

Stormwater pipes (diameter < 450 mm)

Very Good

Stormwater Stormwater pipes pipes (diameter (diameter

= 1,500 mm) >= 450 mm to < 1,500 mm)

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY PUBLIC TRANSIT Our survey included rolling stock assets (i.e., buses, streetcars, ferries, heavy railcars, commuter railcars, light railcars, specialized transit) and fixed public transit assets (i.e., passenger stations/terminals, transit shelters, exclusive rights-of-way, parking lots, bicycle racks and shelters, passenger drop-off facilities, maintenance and storage faculties, transit exclusive bridges, tunnels, tracks, roads).

Public Transit: Asset Inventory 30,000

25,000

Units

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

Publicly owned assets

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief555 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Roads

Tracks

Tunnels (transit exclusive only)

Bridges (transit exclusive only)

Maintenance and storage facilities

Passenger drop-off facilities “kiss and ride”

Bicycle racks and shelters

Parking lots (park and ride)

Exclusive rights-of-ways

Transit shelters

Passenger stations/terminals

Specialized transit (para or handi transpo and dial a ride)

Light railcars

Commuter railcars (locomotives and passenger)

Heavy railcars (subway)

Ferries

Streetcars

Other buses

Hybrid buses (includes diesel, biodiesel and natural gas)

Natural gas buses

Electric buses

Bio-diesel buses

Diesel buses

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE The condition of public transit assets varies across this category. Some relatively new types of infrastructure are in good condition and other assets, such as fixed tracks, are in much worse condition. We assessed these assets using a defined scale and their age profile. ● Public Transit Rolling Stock assets may have a wide range of ESL. For instance buses and other motor vehicles have 7-15 years of ESL, whereas vehicles such as ferries, streetcars, and railcars have 30-40 years of ESL. ● Pubic Transit Fixed Assets may range from 30-75 years of ESL depending on the type of structure and the material they are made of. For instance, a passenger terminal may have 75-100 years of ESL whereas a bus shed may have 30 years of ESL.

Public Transit: Public Owned Rolling Stock Assets (by Purchase Period) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Diesel buses

Bio-diesel buses

Electric Natural gas Hybrid buses Other buses buses (includes buses dieseI, biodiesel and natural gas)

Streetcars

Ferries

Heavy Commuter Light Specialized railcars railcars railcars transit (para or handi (subway) (locomotives transpo and and dial a ride) passenger)

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief556 Administrative

Completed construction 2016

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Public Transit: Public Owned Fixed Assets (by Construction/Purchase Period) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Passenger stations/ terminals

Transit shelters

Exclusive Parking lots rights-of- (park and way ride)

Bicycle Passenger Maintenance Bridges racks and drop-off and storage (transit shelters facilities “kiss facilities exclusive and ride” only)

Tunnels (transit exclusive only)

Tracks

Roads

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief557 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Public Transit: Overall Asset Condition – Rolling Assets

Very Poor Poor Fair

Good Very Good Unknown

21%

33%

Public Transit: Overall Asset Condition – Fixed assets

31%

3% 9%

38% 24%

Public Transit: Overall Asset Condition – Tracks/Roads

23%

19%

12% 15%

20% 30%

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief558 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Very Poor

Poor

Fair

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief559 Administrative

Very Good

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca Roads

Tracks

Tunnels (transit exclusive only)

Bridges (transit exclusive only)

Fixed assets 2019 CIRC

Maintenance and storage facilities

Passenger drop-off facilities “kiss and ride”

Bicycle racks and shelters

Parking lots (park and ride)

Exclusive rights-of-ways

Rolling assets

Transit shelters

Passenger stations/terminals

Specialized transit (para or handi transpo and dial a ride)

2016 CIRC

Light railcars

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Commuter railcars (locomotives and passenger)

Heavy railcars (subway)

Ferries

Streetcars

Other buses

Hybrid buses (includes diesel, biodiesel and natural gas)

Natural gas buses

Electric buses

Bio-diesel buses

Diesel buses

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Public Transit: Comparison with 2016 Results

Tracks/Roads

Public Transit: Detailed Asset Condition – Publicly Owned Asset Condition

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Very Poor Poor Fair Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief560 Administrative Very Good Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca Roads

Tracks

Tunnels (transit exclusive only)

Bridges (transit exclusive only)

Maintenance and storage facilities

Passenger drop-off facilities “kiss and ride”

Bicycle racks and shelters

Parking lots (park and ride)

Exclusive rights-of-ways

Transit shelters

Passenger stations/terminals

Specialized transit (para or handi transpo and dial a ride)

Light railcars

Commuter railcars (locomotives and passenger)

Heavy railcars (subway)

Ferries

Streetcars

Other buses

Hybrid buses (includes diesel, biodiesel and natural gas)

Natural gas buses

Electric buses

Bio-diesel buses

Diesel buses

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Public Transit: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities)

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

Very Poor Poor Fair Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief561 Administrative Very Good Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca Roads

Tracks

Tunnels (transit exclusive only)

Bridges (transit exclusive only)

Maintenance and storage facilities

Passenger drop-off facilities “kiss and ride”

Bicycle racks and shelters

Parking lots (park and ride)

Exclusive rights-of-ways

Transit shelters

Passenger stations/terminals

Specialized transit (para or handi transpo and dial a ride)

Light railcars

Commuter railcars (locomotives and passenger)

Heavy railcars (subway)

Ferries

Streetcars

Other buses

Hybrid buses (includes diesel, biodiesel and natural gas)

Natural gas buses

Electric buses

Bio-diesel buses

Diesel buses

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Public Transit: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities)

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY SOLID WASTE The solid waste assets in our survey included transfer stations assets, waste diversion assets (i.e., composting facilities, materials recovery facilities, anaerobic digestion facilities) and waste disposal assets (i.e., engineered landfills, dump sites, closed sites, incinerators, energy from waste facilities).

Solid Waste: Asset Inventory

1,400 1,200

Units

1,000 800 600 400 200 0

Anaerobic digestion facilities

Closed sites (inactive engineered landfills and dumps)

Composting facilities

Dump sites (active)

Energy from waste facilities

Publicly owned assets

Engineered landfills (active)

Incinerators

Materials recovery facilities

Transfer station assets

Municipally owned assets

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief562 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY THE CURRENT STATE The solid waste assets in our survey included transfer stations assets, waste diversion assets (i.e., composting facilities, materials recovery facilities, anaerobic digestion facilities) and waste disposal assets (i.e., engineered landfills, dump sites, closed sites, incinerators, energy from waste facilities).

Solid Waste: Publicly Owned Asset Inventory (Completed Construction) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Anaerobic digestion facilities

Closed sites (inactive engineered landfills and dumps)

Composting facilities

Dump sites (active)

Energy from waste facilities

Engineered landfills (active)

Incinerators

Materials recovery facilities

Transfer station assets

Completed construction prior to 1940

Completed construction 1940 to 1969

Completed construction 1970 to 1999

Completed construction 2000 to 2009

Completed construction 2010 to 2015

Completed construction 2016

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief563 Administrative

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY Solid Waste: Overall Asset Condition

11% 15% 27% 41%

Solid Waste: Detailed Asset Condition 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Anaerobic digestion facilities

Closed sites (inactive engineered landfills and dumps) Very Poor

Composting facilities

Poor

Dump sites (active)

Fair

Energy from waste facilities

Engineered landfills (active)

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief564 Administrative

Incinerators

Very Good

Materials recovery facilities

Transfer station assets

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

2019

RESULTS BY INFRASTRUCTURE CATEGORY

Solid Waste: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Rural Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Anaerobic digestion facilities

Closed sites (inactive engineered landfills and dumps)

Composting facilities

Dump sites (active)

Energy from waste facilities

Engineered landfills (active)

Incinerators

Materials recovery facilities

Transfer station assets

Solid Waste: Other Relevant Data – Municipally Owned Asset Condition (All Urban Municipalities) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Anaerobic digestion facilities

Closed sites (inactive engineered landfills and dumps) Very Poor

Composting facilities

Poor

Dump sites (active)

Fair

Energy from waste facilities

Engineered landfills (active)

Good

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief565 Administrative

Incinerators

Very Good

Materials recovery facilities

Transfer station assets

Unknown

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

AGENDA ITEM #d)

THANK YOU TO ALL WHO PARTICIPATED On behalf of the Canadian Infrastructure Report Card (CIRC) team, we would like to thank all municipalities who completed this important survey. Your knowledge and expertise will help inform investment needs and asset management practices across Canada.

canadainfrastr ucture.ca

Design by Actual Media

Page of 575 Officer Canadian Infrastruct… 2019-128 Office of the Chief566 Administrative

AGENDA ITEM #a)

By-Law Number 2019-0034 of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac being a by-law to amend By-law No. 2013-0020 (to govern the proceedings of the Council and its Committees, the Conduct of Members and the Calling of Meetings) as it relates to the reading of motions at Council meetings Whereas Section 238(2) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended (the Act) provides that Council shall pass a procedure by-law for governing the calling, place and proceedings of meetings; And Whereas By-law No. 2013-0020, being a bylaw to provide for governing the proceedings of the Council and its committees, the conduct of members and the calling of meetings, was adopted by the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac on May 15, 2013; And Whereas The Corporation of County of Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law No. 2013-0020 as it relates to the reading of motions; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council for The Corporation of the County of Frontenac hereby enacts as follows: That Procedural By-law 2013-0020 as amended be further amended as follows:

That Section 19 – Motions, of the County’s Procedural By-law be amended to add a new Section 19.11 as follows: 19.11

Motions contained in the published agenda will only be read if requested by a member of Council or under the following conditions: a) A member requests a recorded vote on the motion

Motion Considered to be read

b) Where an amendment to a main motion is made, both the amendment, and the motion as amended Any member of Council may request that a motion be summarized by its author. Motions not contained in the published agenda shall be read.

567 of To amend By-law No.Page 2013-0020 (to575 govern the proceedings of the Council …

AGENDA ITEM #a)

That this by-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of final passing. Read a First and Second Time this 16th day of October, 2019. Read a Third Time, Signed, Sealed and Finally Passed this 16th day of October, 2019.

The Corporation of the County of Frontenac

Ron Higgins, Warden

Jannette Amini, Clerk

By-law No. 2018-0034 – to amend By-law No. 2013-0020 (to govern the proceedings of the Council and its Committees, the Conduct of Members and the Calling of Meetings) as it relates to the reading of motions at Council meetings) October 16, 2019 Page 2 of 2

568 of To amend By-law No.Page 2013-0020 (to575 govern the proceedings of the Council …

AGENDA ITEM #b)

By-Law No. 2019-0035 of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac being a by-law to establish a fees and fares schedule for the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry operation for the year 2020 Whereas Section 391 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended authorizes a municipality to impose fees or charges on persons: (a)

for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it;

(b)

for costs payable by it for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of any other municipality or any local board; and

(c)

for the use of its property including property under its control.

And Whereas the Corporation of the County of Frontenac operates a ferry to and from Howe Island known as the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry; And Whereas the Council of the County of Frontenac deems it expedient to adopt the following fees and fares in relation to the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry operation for the year 2020; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac hereby adopts the following fees and fares structure in relation to the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry operation for the year 2019:

The 2019 pass shall provide access to both the County and Township operated ferries.
A common fee structure shall apply for both the County and Township operated ferries.
Fees shall only be collected when vehicles are coming onto Howe Island from either the County or Township operated ferry.
The County and the Township will continue to make available temporary passes to provide for short term requirements, which can be arranged at the Frontenac-Howe Islander Ferry office or the Township of Frontenac Islands’ municipal office on Howe Island.
The discounted tickets to provide to visiting friends and family will be continued in
One book of 10 tickets will be sold per pass holder for a price of $45.00 to accommodate this requirement.

Page 569 of 575Fees and Fares [Proposed By-law No… To Establish 2020 Howe Islander Ferry

AGENDA ITEM #b)

2020 Fees and Fares shall be established as follows: Annual pass for a single vehicle

$265.00 One additional annual pass for a single vehicle per household **
$70.00 Two way trip for single vehicle $6.00 Two way trip for single vehicle with trailer in tow $15.00 Additional charges for annual pass holder with trailer in tow $6.00 Two way trip for any heavy vehicle $15.00 Replacement fee per annual pass (Charged for every replacement) $25.00 Definitions Single Vehicle Single vehicle will include a car, motorcycle, van, SUV, or pickup truck. Heavy Vehicle Any vehicle greater than 6,000 kgs and/or 7 metres (23 feet).
These fees will be discounted by 10% for applicants who can show documentation indicating they are 65 years of age or older during 2020. ** A second pass for $70.00 will only be available if the second vehicle involved is registered to: 

The same individual who purchased the first full-price 2020 annual pass;



An individual who is married to or is in a common-law relationship with the fullprice 2020 annual pass purchaser;



The dependent child of a full-price 2020 annual pass purchaser or the full-price pass purchaser’s married or common-law spouse who is under the age of 18;



The dependent child of a full-price 2020 annual pass purchaser or the full-price pass purchaser’s married or common-law spouse who is over the age of 18 only if the dependent child has both the same permanent address as the fullprice 2020 annual pass purchaser and is attending school full-time.

Documentation must be provided that satisfies the staff person issuing the passes.
A third pass at a reduced rate is not available.
Township of Frontenac Islands’ vehicles and vehicles which, through previous notification, the Township of Frontenac Islands identifies as undertaking Township business are exempted.

By-law No. 2019-0035 – To Establish Frontenac Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares for 2020 October 16, 2019

Page 570 of 575Fees and Fares [Proposed By-law No… To Establish 2020 Howe Islander Ferry

Page 2 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #b)

A memorandum of understanding addressing the details of this arrangement has been executed to address the sharing of revenues between the County and the Township.
That this by-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of final passing. Read a first and second time this 16th day of October, 2019. Read a third time and finally passed this 16th day of October, 2019.

The Corporation of the County of Frontenac

Ron Higgins, Warden

Jannette Amini, Clerk

By-law No. 2019-0035 – To Establish Frontenac Howe Islander Ferry Fees and Fares for 2020 October 16, 2019

Page 571 of 575Fees and Fares [Proposed By-law No… To Establish 2020 Howe Islander Ferry

Page 3 of 3

AGENDA ITEM #c)

By-Law No. 2019-0036 of The Corporation of the County of Frontenac being a by-law to adopt a 2020 Legislated Land Ambulance Response Time Performance Plan Whereas Section 5 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, gives Council the authority to exercise the powers of the municipal corporation and requires that the powers of every Council are to be exercised by by-law; And Whereas on July 31, 2008 changes were made to the Ambulance Act, Ontario Regulation 267/08, amending O. Reg. 257/00 with the heading “Section 22: Part VIII, Response Time Performance Plans, Sections 22 and 23”; And Whereas the County is to submit its Response Time Performance Plan to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), Emergency Health Services Branch Director no later than October 1 of each year (Section 23 (5)) including performance targets for sudden cardiac arrest, CTAS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, where CTAS is the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, a priority setting scale to describe the severity of a patient’s condition; And Whereas by March 31 of each year the same table with the actual times achieved in the year previous will be reported to the MOHLTC; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the County of Frontenac hereby adopts the following land ambulance response time performance plan for the calendar year of 2020, from January 1 to December 31:

That the County of Frontenac set the following criteria under Regulation 257/00, as amended, for its response time targets for 2019: i.

Designated Delivery Agent (DDA) - Sudden Cardiac Arrest 48% percent of the time, within 6 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a person equipped and ready to use an AED at the location of a patient determined to be in sudden cardiac arrest.

ii.

EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 1 70% percent of the time, within 8 minutes from the time ambulance dispatch conveys the call information to the paramedic, the County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a PARAMEDIC as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 1.

Page 572 of 575Time Performance Plan. [Proposed By… To Adopt a 2020 Legislative Response

AGENDA ITEM #c)

iii. EMS Designated Delivery Agent - CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 The County of Frontenac will endeavour to have a Paramedic as defined by the Ambulance Act and duly equipped at the location of a patient determined to be CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 within a period of time determined appropriate by the DDA and noted below in Table 1, or as resources permit (level of effort): Table 1, CTAS 2, 3, 4, 5 EMS Delivery Agent Commitment CTAS Target Time from Paramedic Received Until on Scene 2 10 minutes 3 10 minutes 4 10 minutes 5 10 minutes

% Target 75% 75% 75% 75%

That this by-law shall take effect on the date of its final passing. Read a first and second time this 16th day of October, 2019. Read a third time, finally passed, signed and sealed the 16th day of October, 2019. The Corporation of the County of Frontenac

Ron Higgins, Warden

Jannette Amini, Clerk

County of Frontenac By-law No. 2019-0036 To Adopt a 2020 Land Ambulance Legislative Response Time Performance Plan October 16, 2019

Page 573 of 575Time Performance Plan. [Proposed By… To Adopt a 2020 Legislative Response

Page 2 of 2

AGENDA ITEM #d)

By-Law No. 2019-0037 of The Corporation of the County OF Frontenac being a by-law to confirm all actions and proceedings of County Council on October 16, 2019

Whereas Section 8 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under the Municipal Act or any other Act; and; Whereas Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto provides that a lower-tier municipality and an upper-tier municipality may pass by-laws respecting matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in the Table to Subsection 2 subject to certain provisions, and; Whereas Section 5 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c. 25 and amendments thereto provides that a municipal power, including a municipality’s capacity, rights, powers and privileges under Section 8 shall be exercised by its council and by by-law unless the municipality is specifically authorized to do otherwise; and; Whereas the Council of the County of Frontenac deems it expedient to confirm its actions and proceedings; Now Therefore Be It Resolved That the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac hereby enacts as follows:

That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on October 16, 2019 be confirmed as actions for which the municipality has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person.
That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on October 16, 2019 be confirmed as being matters within the spheres of jurisdiction described in Subsection 2 of Section 11 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25 and amendments thereto.
That all actions and proceedings of the Council of the Corporation of the County of Frontenac taken at its regular meeting held on October 16, 2019 except those taken by by-law and those required by by-law to be done by resolution are hereby sanctioned, ratified and confirmed as though set out within and forming part of this by-law.

574By-law of 575No. 2019-0037] Confirmatory By-lawPage [Proposed

AGENDA ITEM #d)

That this by-law shall come into force and take effect as of the final passing thereof. Read a First and Second Time this 16th day of October 2019. Read a Third Time and Finally Passed, Signed and Sealed this 16th day of October,

The Corporation of the County Of Frontenac

Ron Higgins, Warden

Jannette Amini, Clerk

By-Law No. 2019-0037 – To Confirm all Actions and Proceedings of County Council October 16, 2019

575By-law of 575No. 2019-0037] Confirmatory By-lawPage [Proposed

age 2 of 2

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.