Council Meeting - 07 Jun 2016 - Agenda — North Frontenac News Media

Published June 7, 2016

Word Count 39880 words

Reading Time 188 min read

Body: Council Type: Agenda Meeting: Regular Date: June 7, 2016 Collection: Council Agendas Municipality: South Frontenac

[View Document (PDF)](/docs/south-frontenac/Agendas/Council/2016/Council Meeting - 07 Jun 2016 - Agenda.pdf)

Document Text

Page 1 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TIME: DATE: PLACE:

7:00 PM, Tuesday, June 7, 2016 Council Chambers.

Call to Order

Resolution

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

Recess - n/a

Public Meeting - n/a

Approval of Minutes

Council Meeting of May 17, 2016

5 - 13

Committee of the Whole Meeting of May 24, 2016

14 - 16

Business Arising from the Minutes

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of MotionSections 5.10.2 and 5.11

Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant, re: By-law 2016-20 Township Initiated By-law

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Zoning By-law Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11

19 - 22

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Outdated Invoices

23 - 24

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Algae and Aquatic Plant Education Manual

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Support for VCA Electronic Sign

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Organizational Review CAO recommendations for adoption

Reports Requiring Action

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Ulrich Road Closing By-law 2016-35

31 - 35

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Committee of Adjustment - Use of iPads

36 - 37

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Sand Salt Storage Tender

27 - 30

Page 2 of 136

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Equipment and Material RFQ’s

Committee Meeting Minutes

Corporate Services Committee Meeting of April 15, 2016

Portland Recreation Meeting held April 25, 2016 (see request for use of Centennial Park - separate resolution)

Loughborough Recreation Committee Meeting of April 25, 2016

48 - 50

Storrington Recreation Committee Meeting of April 25, 2016

51 - 53

By-Laws

By-law 2016-20 (Third Reading only)

54 - 58

By-law 2016-35 - Road Closing

59 - 60

By-law 2016-36 - Housekeeping

61 - 62

Reports for Information

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing

63 - 79

Lindsay Mills, Planner, re: Hartington Subdivision Peer Review

80 - 84

Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant, re: Summer Meeting Schedule/OEMC Conference

Information Items

Peter Counihan, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

John Coates, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Steven Sadura, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Petition against Proposed By-law Changes

89 - 94

Pamela Jones, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

95 - 98

G. Burton Harbison, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

99 100

Marg & Greg Allen, re; Proposed Zoning Changes

101

39 - 45

Page 3 of 136

Wilf Ruland, P. Geo. re: Initial Independent Review of Hartington Development Proposal

102 117

Ted McMeekin, Minister of Municipal Affairs, re: Inclusionary Zoning

Bill 204

118

Sommer Casgrain-Robertson, re: New Conservation Authorities Act Review Consultation

119 120

Fred Bresee, re: Bedford District Road Naming

121 123

Mark Gerretsen, MP, Kingston and the Islands, re: Sunbury Road EDR

124

Pamela Musgrave, Director of Revenue Development, Muscular Dystrophy Canada, re: Fire Department Fundraising

125 126

Debra Rantz, Director of Education, LDSB, re: Long Term Accommodation Plan

127 129

Rob McRae, Watershed Planning Coordinator, re: Cataraqui Source Protection Committee

130

Township of Wainfleet, re: Renewable Procurement Initiatives resolution support

131

Town of Essex, re: Support for Large Procurement Initiative Resolution

132

Municipality of Killarney, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiatives resolution

133

Municipality of Lambton Shores, re: Support for “No-Wake” restriction resolution

134

Municipality of Killarney, re; Support for “No Wake” restriction resolution

135

Notice of Motions

Announcements

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Closed Session (if requested)

Confirmatory By-law

By-law 2016-37

Adjournment

136

Page 4 of 136

Resolution

Page 5 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 Time: 7:00 PM Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 17 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Mark Schjerning. Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant. 1.

Call to Order

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-17-1 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT the Council meeting of May 17, 2016 be called to order at 7:00 p.m. Carried

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof- n/a

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess *** - n/a

Delegations

Suspension of Procedural Bylaw - Re: Delegations at Council - Resolution only Resolution No. 2016-17-2 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT Council suspends the procedural rules limiting delegations to Committee of the Whole meetings and receive delegations at the May 17, 2016 Council meeting and that the time limit not apply. Carried

Allan and Partners, LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, re: 2015 Financial Statements Howard Allan provided an overview of the 2015 financial statements noting that South Frontenac has a healthy balance sheet. Tax arrears have decreased over the past five years and this is in the low range when compared to other municipalities: 10% is considered to be low risk by the province. Deputy Mayor Sutherland felt the number of household figure was encouraging and that it would be helpful to know the number of vacant lots available to be built on. Councillor Sleeth asked how South Frontenac compares to other municipalities with respect to the amount of reserves. Mayor Vandewal also questioned the amount of reserves and what the recommendation is. Howard Allan commented that South Frontenac is generally in the middle

Page 6 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 range with other municipalities having around 15%. It is difficult to say whether reserves should be higher, this should be part of the long term financial planning that includes capital asset management and capital programs and replacements in order to make this determination. He noted that capital spending was close to being even with the capital projects in 2015. He stated that the township could increase their tax rate to account for growth and inflation. Mr. Allan noted that 1.5 to 1.8% are comparative tax rates but you also need to look at the average assessment based on the yearly taxes and services provided by a municipality. Mayor Vandewal felt the report was vague on principles and checks and balances. Mr. Allan confirmed that there were no deficiencies in the audit process. Procurement and risk management were issues that were addressed with the staff directly. Tests on the payroll system is an example of what the auditors include in their processes. Wayne Orr noted that with respect to procurement, a report on vendors and sole sourcing will be included on the May 24 agenda. There will be a process put in place for the inventory of bag tags and a reconciliation will be done at year end. Councillor Schjerning referred to the tangible capital assets, specifically linear assets. There had been a report that indicated over 300 million in linear assets and he questioned where the discrepancy was. Mr. Allan explained that the original cost was in the range of 150 million and that replacement costs was factored in. Resolution No. 2016-17-3 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT the 2015 Financial Statements be accepted as presented by Allan Chartered Accountants. Carried 6.

Public Meeting

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-17-4 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth THAT a public meeting be held to discuss planning matters related to:  Zoning By-law Amendment - Concession XIII, Part Lots 1 & 2 Bedford  Closing of Road Allowance in Part of Lot 19, Concessions V and VI, Loughborough Carried

Review of Application for Zoning By-law Amendment - Concession XIII, Part of Lots 1 & 2, Bedford District Lindsay Mills referred to his report noting that the rezoning is for a 30 acres waterfront parcel will permit it to be used for residential purposes. The owners are looking to sell the lot and wish to rezone to increase the potential market value.

Page 2 of 9

Page 7 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 Mayor Vandewal questioned the amount of water frontage. There were no comments from the public. c)

Closing of Road Allowance in Part of Lot 19, Concessions V and VI, Loughborough Mr. Mills referred to his report and noted that the property owners at 4819 North Shore Crescent have requested to have the road allowance closed and they wish to purchase a portion of it to add to their property abutting to the north. The subject portion of road allowance is approximately 52 metres long and is 0.24 of an acre in size. Mayor Vandewal felt the fence should be moved as there are cattle pastured on one side. This would provide a clear property line. There were no comments from the public. Resolution No. 2016-17-5 Moved by Councillor Sleeth Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT an opportunity having been provided, the public meeting be closed. Carried

Approval of Minutes

Council Meeting of April 19, 2016

Committee of the Whole Meeting of April 26, 2016

Council Meeting of May 3, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-17-6 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill THAT Council approves the minutes of the April 19 and May 3, 2016 Council meetings. Carried

Committee of the Whole Meeting held May 4, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-17-7 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council approves the minutes of the April 26, 2016 and May 4, 2016 Committee of the Whole meetings. Carried

Business Arising from the Minutes

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Changes to Procedural By-law Resolution No. 2016-17-8 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning

Page 3 of 9

Page 8 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 THAT the Procedural Guidelines be amended to clarify that delegations that are required by South Frontenac Township or have been requested by Council shall not be subject to the 10 minute presentation time limit; and THAT members of Council shall be able to ask questions related to the presentation. Deferred b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Notice of Motion - Development Activity on Johnston Point Mayor Vandewal requested a recorded vote. Councillor Sleeth and Deputy Mayor Sutherland voted in favour with the remaining Council members voting against. Resolution No. 2016-17-9 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Sleeth WHEREAS work is currently being done on the Johnston Point property, and WHEREAS the Conditions of Approval require an MNRF evaluation of species at risk on the property, THEREFORE be it resolved that Council submit to the MNRF our concern that work being done on Johnston’s Point may harm specials at risk habitat, and FURTHER it be resolved that Township and County Planners be asked to comment on whether the Conditions of Approval for the Johnston’s Point condominium permit work to commence on the Point before a species at risk evaluation has been completed by the MNRF, who has approved the work being done on the Point, and what actions can be taken to ensure that the MNRF evaluation is done in a timely manner. Defeated

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer,re: Support for Fort McMurray Resolution No. 2016-17-10 Moved by Deputy Mayor Sutherland Seconded by Councillor Revill WHEREAS Fort McMurray has suffered a devastating loss due to wildfire and; WHEREAS AMO has challenged Ontario Municipalities to donate and; WHEREAS AMO is coordinating and accepting donations with a commitment to processing them in time to ensure matching support from the Canadian and Alberta Governments NOW THEREFORE the Township of South Frontenac commits $500.00 to be donated through AMO to support Fort McMurray. Carried

Reports Requiring Action

Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing Resolution No. 2016-17-11

Page 4 of 9

Page 9 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 Moved by Councillor Revill Seconded by Deputy Mayor Sutherland THAT Council receives for information the Accounts Payable and Payroll Listing dated May 17, 2016 in the amount of $553,113.58. Carried b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Councillor Absence Resolution No. 2016-17-12 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT Council authorize the absence of Councillor Robinson to September 15, 2016 and continue to pay the Councillor. Carried

Committee Meeting Minutes

Verona Community Association meeting of February 10, 2016

South Frontenac Recreation Committee meeting of April 18, 2016

Portland District and Area Heritage Society meeting held April 20, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-17-13 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT Council receives for information the minutes of the following committee meetings:  Verona Community Association meeting held February 10, 2016  South Frontenac Recreation Committee meeting held April 18, 2016  Portland District and Area Heritage Society meeting held April 20, 2016 Carried

By-Laws

By-law 2016-31 - Tax Rate By-law Resolution No. 2016-17-14 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT the following by-laws be given first and second reading:  By-law 2016-31  By-law 2016-32  By-law 2016-33 Carried Resolution No. 2016-17-15 Moved by Councillor McDougall Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT By-law 2016-31, being a by-law to levy taxes in the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried

By-law 2016-32 - Rezone Concession XIII, Pt Lots 1 & 2, Bedford District

Page 5 of 9

Page 10 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-17-16 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-32, being a by-law to amend By-law 2003-75, as amended, to rezone land from Open Space-Public (OS) Zone to Limited Service ResidentialWaterfront (RLSW) Zone, Part Lots 1 and 2, Concession XIII, be given third reading, signed and sealed. Carried c)

By-law 2016-33 - Road Allowance Closure - Concessions V and VI, Pt Lot 19, Loughborough Resolution No. 2016-17-17 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor McDougall THAT By-law 2016-33, being a by-law to stop up, close and sell a portion of an unopened road allowance between Concessions V and VI, Part Lot 19, be given third reading signed and sealed, and that the fence be moved to the southern property line. Carried

Reports for Information

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Community Projects Grants Awarded.

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Year to Date Financials to March 31, 2016

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Overall tax rate and functional breakdown

Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant, re: Town Hall Meeting Schedule

Information Items

Tim Ross, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Marg & Greg Allen, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Walter & Monica St. Pierre, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Jan Cunningham Rae & Derek Ray, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Tim Upton, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Jill Baker, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Kaye MacInnes, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Bruce Myers, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Barry & Rene Grant, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Joan Irwin, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

G. Burton Harbison, President, West Devil Lake Property Owners Group, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Page 6 of 9

Page 11 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 l)

Doug Acton, re: Proposed Zoning By-law Changes

John St. Aubin & Cindy Benoit, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Don Smith, re: Proposed Zoning Changes

Jeff and Barbara Canton, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Greg Fisher, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Rob Pasch, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Gord Rodgers, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Fran Willes, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (form May 10)

Gerald Gabriel, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Rachael Smith-Tryon, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Petition - Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Suzanne & John Billings, re: Proposed Zoning Changes (from May 10)

Premier Kathleen Wynne, re: Council Resolution on large renewable initiatives

Municipality of Central Huron, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiatives resolution

Municipality of Tweed, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiatives resolution

aa)

Township of Zorra, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiative resolution

ab)

Township of Carling, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiative resolution

ac)

Norfolk County, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiatives resolution

ad)

MMAH, re; Proclamation of the Infrastructure for Jobs & Prosperity Act, 2015

ae)

Sydenham High School Bus Drivers, re: Concerns with traffic congestion at High School This item will be discussed at the Public Services meeting on Thursday, May 19, 2016.

Notice of Motions - n/a

Announcements

Councillor Sleeth relayed appreciation from the seniors group who use Storrington Centre with respect to the work being done on the parking lot. The material is comprised of 90% recyclable material. He asked that this be conveyed to Ray Leonard, Lead Hand.

Page 7 of 9

Page 12 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016 b)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland commended Mayor Vandewal on the response to his resolution concerning large renewable procurement initiatives.

At Mayor Vandewal’s request Wayne Orr provided an update on his discussions with other CAO’s and Kelly Pender at the County regarding the mandated Planning Advisory Committee. The outcome of the discussions make it challenging to move forward. Wayne Orr confirmed that his report will be forthcoming on the May 24 agenda regarding the May 4 meeting that focused on the organizational review.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items)

Matt Rennie asked about the notice of motion and the conditions of settlement for Johnston Point. Is Council ignoring the request to ask for MNRF review with respect to species at risk. Wayne Orr explained that the motion was defeated but that terms and conditions were established by the Ontario Municipal Board. Staff are tasked with ensuring the developer has to support meeting the these terms and conditions.

Closed Session - n/a

Confirmatory By-law

By-law 2016-34 Resolution No. 2016-17-18 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT By-law 2016-34, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac, be given first and second reading this 17 day of May, 2016. Carried Resolution No. 2016-17-19 Moved by Councillor Schjerning Seconded by Councillor Barr THAT By-law 2016-34, being a by-law to confirm generally previous actions of the Council of the Township of South Frontenac be given third reading signed and sealed this 17 day of May 2016. Carried

Adjournment

Resolution Resolution No. 2016-17-20 Moved by Councillor Barr Seconded by Councillor Schjerning THAT the Council meeting of May 17 be adjourned at 8:12 p.m. Carried

Page 8 of 9

Page 13 of 136 Minutes of Council May, 17, 2016

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Page 9 of 9

Page 14 of 136

Minutes of Committee of the Whole May 24, 2016 Time: 7:00 pm Location: Council Chambers Meeting # 17 Present: Mayor Ron Vandewal, Pat Barr, John McDougall, Alan Revill, Mark Schjerning, Ron Sleeth, Ross Sutherland Staff: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, Lindsay Mills, Planner, Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, Angela Maddocks, Executive Assistant 1.

Call to Order

The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Declaration of pecuniary interest and the general nature thereof-n/a

Scheduled Closed Session - n/a

***Recess ***- n/a

Delegations

Philippe Archambault, re: Speed on Silverwood Drive Mr. Archambault spoke to the petition included in the agenda package that reflected signatures from all residents on Silverwood Drive. Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, agreed to install temporary speed bumps to slow down traffic. Councillor McDougall spoke to how effective the temporary speed bumps had been in Verona.

Wayne Conway, President, Verona Community Assoc., re: Electronic Sign Proposal Mr. Conway requested Council’s approval to provide power for an electronic sign that the Verona Community Association has raised money for. The sign would be located at the existing location at Road 38 and Burnett Road in Verona and would display from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm daily. The power would be sourced from a direct hookup to a light pole and a special Township monthly rate has been negotiated with Hydro One. Council was supportive of paying the monthly fee. They questioned the feasibility of adding emergency notices from the township for road conditions etc. Wayne Conway explained that the sign is updated through remote access from his laptop, there would be an additional monthly cost to improve the remote access for updating the sign.

Reports Requiring Action

Mark Segsworth, Public Works Manager, re: Outdated Invoices Council was supportive of the recommendation to allocate the outdated

Page 15 of 136 Committee of the Whole May 24, 2016 invoices against the 2016 and 2017 budgets. b)

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer, re: Organizational Review Recommendations Wayne Orr reviewed his report and recommendations with Council. While there was no direction for any changes beyond 2016, the general consensus of Council was to look at moving forward with what the CAO has proposed for 2016 with respect to the hiring of a Development Services Manager and realigning some of the reporting structure. Council also indicated that it wished to pursue assuming authority for subdivisions and condominium approvals over the long term. from the County. There are expectations of resolving planning issues at the upcoming meeting with the County CAO and Warden.

Reports for Information

Louise Fragnito, Treasurer, re: Sole Source Vendor/Vendor of Record Councillor Revill asked that the listing be sorted based on the services provided i.e. contractor/ consultant/engineering etc. He felt there may be some efficiencies to be found by doing so.

Rise & Report

Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority The next meeting is tomorrow, nothing new to report.

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Auditors report has been received with recommendations about having greater reserves.

Quinte Region Conservation Authority No report.

Portland Heritage The summer student is working on promotional and educational information for the museum and the entire township.

Information Items

Alan K. Cohen, Soloway, Wright LLP, re: Johnston Point - Notice of Motion Species at Risk (previously circulated by email to Council)

Deputy Mayor Sutherland, re: Johnston Point and MNRF

Battersea Loughborough Lake Assoc Board of Directors, re: Development Activity -Johnston Point

Shelley Nemeth, Coordinator, OPP Awards & Recognition Unit, re:

Page 2 of 3

Page 16 of 136 Committee of the Whole May 24, 2016 Commissioner’s Commendation for Assist e)

Sophie Kiwala, MPP, Kingston and the Islands, re: Sunbury Road Emergency Detour Route

Municipality of Brooke Alvinston, re: Support for Community Vibrancy resolution

Town of Lakeshore, re: Support for Large Renewable Procurement Initiatives

Algonquin & Lakeshore Catholic District School Board, re: Notice of Policy Review & Public Meeting

OGRA Heads Up Alert, re: Call for Province to review funding allocation formula Council requested that their support for this review be forwarded to local MPP’s.

Notice of Motions

Deputy Mayor Sutherland served notice of motion requesting that the township purchase 1500 copies of a brochure on “preserving lake qualities” that has been published by the Tay Valley and Mississippi Conservation Authorities.

Announcements

Councillor Schjerning inquired about the hydro seeding at “The Point”. There has been very limited growth due to unseasonable colder temperatures and a lack of rain. The impact of pedestrian traffic over the past long weekend is also a concern. Mark Segsworth commented that the pump for the football field is being relocated next to the electrical building and he may request that the Fire Department assist with watering in the meantime as the “grand re-opening” is scheduled for early June.

Councillor Sleeth questioned the status of a water quantity concern from a resident adjacent to a recent severance application. Mayor Vandewal reported that while this is unfortunate, any property owner can drill a well on their property without any permits required. In this particular case, the Ministry of the Environment requested the applicant to conduct draw down tests on other wells in the area. He indicated that he had called the resident prior to the meeting for an update but was unable to speak with her.

Mayor Vandewal reminded Council of the Long Service Award luncheon for staff on Thursday and that the offices would be closed from noon until 1:30 pm.

Question of Clarity (from the public on outcome of agenda items) - n/a

Closed Session - n/a

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.

Page 3 of 3

Page 17 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

May 24, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Zoning Bylaw Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed changes to Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 as presented on March 15, 2016 be amended to incorporate the following concepts: •

If a building burns down or is destroyed by an Act of God, owners would need to get a building permit to rebuild the same sized structure on the existing footprint.

•

Defer any decision on the subject of a property owner wishing to remove and rebuild a structure of the same size on the same foot print until Council revisits the Official Plan and then only permit the rebuild with approvals from Conservation, Public Health and an environmental assessment report. Otherwise the building would have to be moved back to make it better for the environment.

•

If under any circumstances there is a wish to expand an existing structure or rebuild a larger sized structure then the request has to go to the Committee of Adjustment.

BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-Law 2015-56 establishes the process for Notice of Motion as outlined below. At the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 10, 2016, Mayor Vandewal in response to significant community attendance and participation on the proposed Housekeeping Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw, served Notice of Motion to amend the proposed changes to Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and then voted upon.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 18 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

June 2, 2016

Agenda Date:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: By-law 2016-20 – Township Initiated By-law RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council give third reading to By-law 2016-20 as amended at the March 15, 2016 meeting. BACKGROUND: Council amended the original by-law that was presented at the March 15, 2016 Council meeting to remove the “text changes” that were identified as Items 6 and 7 and referenced Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11. The amended by-law is attached under the By-laws section of the agenda package. Submitted/approved by: Angela Maddocks Executive Assistant

Page 19 of 136

PLANNING REPORT Township of South Frontenac Planning Department Prepared for Council Agenda Date: June 7, 2016 Date of Report: June 1, 2016

Applicant: Township-Initiated

Subject: Township-Initiated Text Amendments to the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law

Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass By-law No. 2016-36 to clarify the wording of section 5.10.2 and to delete part of the wording in section 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law.

Purpose of Report: The purpose of this report is to bring back to Council proposed amendments to two sections of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law to clarify the intent of the wording. Attachments include a letter from the Township’s solicitor supporting the new wording and an amending by-law to effect the changes.

Background The Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the Township, has been in full force and effect since 2005 and was prepared in order to implement the policies of the Official Plan as required by the Planning Act. Using the By-law since 2005, staff periodically became aware of minor errors/omissions in the text of the by-law and in the zoning schedules (maps). At a Public Meeting held on March 15, 2016 Council passed a by-law to correct most of these. However, concerns were expressed by the public over two of the proposed amendments namely the changes to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 dealing with legal non-complying structures. Thus, these sections were not passed and it was agreed that they should be brought back to the Committee of the Whole for further discussion. Accordingly, to gather the public’s input and to deal with these two sections, meetings were advertised inviting the public’s comments. The meetings were held at the Committee of the Whole on April 26, 2016 and on May 10, 2016 where delegations from the public were heard.

Discussion The clarifications to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 were originally brought forward because of concerns expressed by Planning and Building over their interpretation. The following is a discussion of the proposed amended wording to each section along with an explanation and rationale.

Section 5.10.2 Existing Buildings Within 30 Metres (98.4 ft.) of a Waterbody or Watercourse does not permit buildings to be reconstructed. The definition reads as follows: “Where a building has been erected prior to the date of passing of this Bylaw on an existing lot and said building has less than the minimum 30 metre (98.4 ft.) setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody or watercourse, then said building may be repaired, renovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the

Page 20 of 136 gross floor area or increase in height. In addition, no living space shall be added below grade to any existing building or structure.” This wording allows any building within the 30 metre setback to be renovated, strengthened and made more structurally sound but it does not permit it to be taken down and reconstructed. This section is meant to implement the intent of the Official Plan which is: i) ii)

iii)

that all new construction should be well setback from any waterbody with a minimum setback of 30 metres, that existing buildings within the 30 metre setback, once removed, should be set back further so that, some day in the future, all buildings will be well set back from waterbodies to ensure protection of our lakes into the future, that existing buildings within the setback may remain as legal noncomplying structures but they lose this legal status when they are removed.

The Township’s position has been that, when the walls of the building are removed, the building is considered to be gone and it cannot be reconstructed at its present location without a minor variance. However, this interpretation should be ‘built-in’ to section 5.10.2 so that the meaning is clearer. A letter, dated April 20, 2016, from the Township’s solicitor supports this view. The letter is attached hereto as Attachment #1. Accordingly, the whole section should read as follows: (changes in bold type) “Where a building has been erected prior to the date of passing of this Bylaw on an existing lot and said building has less than the minimum 30 metre (98.4 ft.) setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody or watercourse, then said building may be repaired, renovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. Reconstruction of the building is prohibited. In addition, no living space shall be added below grade to any existing building or structure. For the purposes of interpreting section 5.10.2, once more than fifty percent of the exterior load-bearing walls of a structure located within the minimum 30 metre setback have been removed, the land is deemed to be vacant and the structure may not be reconstructed within the 30 metre setback.” It is recommended that Council approve the above clarifications to section 5.10.2. 2.

Section 5.11 of the by-law REPLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES, presently reads as follows: “5.11 REPLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES A building or structure, including a legal non-conforming and/or legal non-complying building or structure, may be replaced with a new building or structure in the case of partial or complete destruction caused by fire, lightning, explosion, tempest, flood or act of God, or demolition permit required by the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac or other authority for safety, health or sanitation requirements, providing such building or structure is serviced by a potable water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the appropriate responsible authority. A building permit will only be issued, in the absence of zoning relief, provided no enlargement of the footprint or increase in gross floor area is proposed and provided the permit is applied for within 12 months of the partial or complete demolition/destruction. The replacement building shall be located on

Page 21 of 136 and not increase the footprint or gross floor area of the nonconforming/non complying building. The applicant shall provide proof to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that there will be no increase in the size of the building footprint or gross floor area and that the replacement building will be located within the same footprint as the non-conforming/non-complying building. Where applicable, floodproofing and avoidance of erosion hazards should be considered.” This section is intended to permit any building within the 30 metre setback to be reconstructed if it is destroyed by fire or storm or if it is dilapidated to the point where the Township orders it to be removed for safety reasons. This section is meant to permit property-owners to rebuild after destruction that is beyond their control. However, it has been the subject of some controversy because some propertyowners argue that they should be allowed to reconstruct because their structure has deteriorated to the point where it is unsafe and unusable. However, this state of dis-repair is often the result of neglect where the building has been allowed to deteriorate – perhaps moss has been allowed to grow on the roof, for example, resulting in water entering into the walls. When this matter was first brought to Council in March it was proposed that section 5.11 be removed completely and that each proposed reconstruction be dealt with through the minor variance process. The rationale for this was that, in the past, when structures near the water have been destroyed, the owners have applied to expand the structure anyway as part of the plan to rebuild and this has always required a minor variance. However, following input from the public and from Council, as an alternative to completely removing section 5.11, Council may wish to consider the following additional options:

Leave section 5.11 the way it is,
Defer decision on the amendment for approximately one year and monitor the frequency of occurrence of such requests to determine whether changing section 5.11 is warranted,
Delete the part of the first sentence of the section that deals with demolition required by the Township for safety, health or sanitation requirements and potable water and sewage system so that the section reads as follows:

“5.11 REPLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES A building or structure, including a legal non-conforming and/or legal noncomplying building or structure, may be replaced with a new building or structure in the case of partial or complete destruction caused by fire, lightning, explosion, tempest, flood or act of God. A building permit will only be issued, in the absence of zoning relief, provided no enlargement of the footprint or increase in gross floor area is proposed and provided the permit is applied for within 12 months of the partial or complete demolition/destruction. The replacement building shall be located on and not increase the footprint or gross floor area of the non-conforming/non complying building. The applicant shall provide proof to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official that there will be no increase in the size of the building footprint or gross floor area and that the replacement building will be located within the same footprint as the non-conforming/non-complying building. Where applicable, floodproofing and avoidance of erosion hazards should be considered.”

Page 22 of 136 Option #3 would still permit any dwelling destroyed by fire, lightning, tempest, flood or act of God to be rebuilt as of right but, by removing the sentence that would require it to be demolished for health or safety reasons and to require potable water and approved septic, the intent of the section would be more clear. If, ultimately, any such structure must be removed for health or safety concerns then it can still be evaluated based on its own merits as it is brought to the attention of the Township. It is recommended that Council choose Option #3 above which would delete part of the first sentence in section 5.11. CONCLUSION The Planning Department advertised these amendments according to the provisions of the Planning Act and a great amount of public input has been received. The input was mostly negative to the amendments, however, as stated by Planning throughout the process, the amended wording in section 5.10.2 is simply for purposes of clarification as it has always been the Township’s practice to not permit reconstruction of legal non-complying structures within 30 metres of any waterbody if they are removed. Furthermore, the proposed wording is supported by the legal opinion of the Township’s solicitor (attached). As has been the practice of the Township, any such proposed reconstruction within the setback would still need to be processed through a minor variance application. Much of the public’s negativity related to the proposed removal altogether of section 5.11. Perhaps the change presented in Option #3 above would address most of these concerns in consideration that it would keep the right to rebuild a dwelling following destruction by forces beyond the owner’s control while not necessarily permitting a dilapidated structure to automatically be rebuilt – which was the concern of Planning in the first place. Instead, any such rebuild would need to be evaluated by the Township at the time of the proposed reconstruction. The text amendments are expected to help staff and the public to interpret the zoning regulations more clearly on a daily basis. Therefore, the proposed new wording is supported by Planning. An amending by-law to effect these changes is attached hereto as By-law No. 2016-36. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached zoning amending By-law No. 2016-36 to effect amendments to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law as described in the Planning Report dated June 1, 2016, be passed. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments

HouskeepingReportToCouncilJunel2016two

Page 23 of 136

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

June 2, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Outdated Invoices RECOMMENDATION: That 50% ($39,988.23) of the previous years invoices be charged against the 2016 budget and the remaining 50% ($39,988.23) be budgeted for in the 2017 budget to be paid in January 2017. BACKGROUND: Council reviewed a report from the Public Works Department at the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 24, 2016 regarding recently received invoices from a contractor for work performed in 2014 and 2015. The report summarizes where these expenses were incurred and what steps need to be taken to address this issue. ANALYSIS: Summarized below is a breakdown of costs by activity for the years 2014 and 2015: 2015

DESC

2014 AMOUNT

Plow Water Plant

$745.80

$1,553.75

Plow Syd. Firehall

$881.40

$1,689.35

Plow Town Hall

$949.20

$1,819.30

Plow Little Long Lk Rd

$949.20

$1,819.30

Plow Sydenham Village

$3,661.20

$5,424.00

Plow Morgan Drive Plow Harrowsmith

AMOUNT

$1,898.40 $1,075.76

$2,343.62

$883.66

$1,959.42

Plow Verona

$2,306.26

$3,880.42

Plow Bellrock

$998.92

$1,882.58

Wntr-Sydenham Sidewalks

$1,579.18

$5,393.49

Wntr-Harrowsmith Sidewalks

$728.85

$2,575.28

Plow H’smith Side Roads

Page 24 of 136

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wntr-Perth Rd Sidewalks

$437.31

$1,482.00

Wntr-Verona Sidewalks

$655.97

$2,550.98

Wntr-Hartington Sidewalks

$194.36

$850.33

Garbage/bin rental – Keeley Rd

$2,945.35

Portland Waste Disposal Site

$15,322.97

Bedford Garge-Bin Rental

$1,149.20

Grading

$525.45

Patching

$762.75

Sweeping – Arterial

$1,476.47

Sweeping – Local

$1,659.01

Keeley Garage

$159.61

Other – misc

$2,806.36 $16,047.07

GRAND TOTAL

$63,929.39 $79,97646

The common practice is a contractor will invoice us within 30 days of the work being done. In this case we did not appreciate the fact that we had not been invoiced when we engaged the same contractor for additional work. The vast majority of the itemized descriptions of work performed involved a vendor of record. Going forward most of this work will be tendered. As a lot of this work is Winter Control, we will use this opportunity to reassess what routes should be outsourced and what routes should be undertaken inhouse for more effective service delivery. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: As these invoices were not received until after the previous years financial were closed off, these expenses cannot be back charged. The Public Services Committee at its meeting of May 19, 2016, recommended that 50% of total owing be charged against the 2016 Budget and the remaining 50% be paid from the 2017 Budget in January 2017.

Submitted/approved by: Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

Page 25 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

May 25, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Notice of Motion – Algae and Aquatic Plant Educational Manual RECOMMENDATION: That Council purchase 500 copies of the Algae and Aquatic Plant Educational manual at a cost of $1,500 for distribution to lake front residents at lake association annual meetings. BACKGROUND: Council’s Procedural By-Law 2015-56 establishes the process for Notice of Motion. At the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 24, 2016, Deputy Mayor Sutherland, served Notice of Motion to purchase and distribute copies of the booklet “Algae and Aquatic Plant Educational Manual” The RVCA has provided an electronic copy for our website. They have confirmed that they would need to have 500 copies printed as they do not have them in stock. This would take approximately 2 weeks. The cost for this initiative has not been budgeted for. A notice of motion requires a seconder at the next regular Council meeting. If seconded, the motion is debated and then voted upon.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 26 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

May 27, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Support for Verona Community Association (VCA) Electronic Sign RECOMMENDATION: That Council support the VCA Electronic Sign to be located at Road 38 and Burnett Street in Verona, by agreeing to have the sign hooked up to a street light power supply and absorb the monthly hydro costs to operate the sign.

BACKGROUND: In response to general support from Council to the delegation from Wayne Conway, President of the Verona Community Association on May 24, the above resolution has been prepared as directed for Council’s consideration.

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Page 27 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT PREPARED FOR COW:

May 30, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Organizational Review – CAO recommendations for adoption RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council establish a goal of seeking delegated authority for the approval of subdivisions and plans of condominium effective in 2019; THAT Council adopt the 2016 CAO organizational review recommendations effective July 1, 2016; THAT the job description for the Development Services Manager include responsibility for preparing South Frontenac to be ready to assume responsibility for approval of subdivisions and plans of condominiums; THAT 2016 funding for the above be allocated from working funds; AND THAT the 2017 and 2018 recommendations be brought forward for decision in advance of the corresponding budget debate. BACKGROUND: On May 24 Council received a summary of the steps taken in the organizational review process, a summary of the recommendations from the consultants, the feedback from Council during the May 4 session, an overview of the continuum for delivering planning services and the following recommendations from the CAO, which incorporated the addition of 3 staff over 2 ½ years. 2016 Plan:

Reassign the Arena Recreation Supervisor to report to the Public Works Manager
Reassign the HR/Legislative Compliance Coordinator to report to the Treasurer.
Create and hire a Development Services Manager with the Planner/Deputy Clerk and CBO reporting to this new role. Focus on streamlining the development process and enhancing customer service. In addition take on the role of coordinating current and future economic development resources as well as contracted bylaw enforcement services.
Establish a Senior Management team comprised of the CAO, Public Works Manager, Treasurer and Development Services Manager assisted by the Executive Assistant to develop an implementation plan for the strategic plan as well as required policy and long term needs. See Draft Organizational Chart attached.
Given the opportunity with a pending retirement update and redefine the role of Accounting Clerk
Relocate staff to accommodate the new positon and to facilitate the formation of a cohesive senior team focused and resourced for success. • Public Works Manager moves to George St. (current HR office) • Fire Chief moves to Sunbury hall until Perth Road Station is built

Page 28 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT

• • •

Arena/Recreation Supervisor moves to Keeley (PW Mgr. office) HR position moves to Recreation office New Development Services Manager to Fire Chief’s office

2017 Plan:

Separate the CAO/Clerk role into two and hire a Clerk to support Council and Committees, carryout statutory responsibilities and fulfill communications role. Located in Mayor’s office. CAO to be named as additional Deputy Clerk.
Adjust Council / Committee Structure, reflecting focus on Strategic Plan. Establish the creation of a Development Services Committee. Council and all three committees to be supported by the Clerk
Create a community driven Economic Development Committee to assist with formulating an economic development strategy and allocate budget dollars for initiatives
With an improved structure focused on implementing Council’s objectives time will be available to consider operational processes and needs. 2018 Plan:
Establish and hire full time Fire Prevention/Education Officer. Allowing for enhanced policy and administration services as well as emergency preparedness services by the Fire Chief. To be located at Perth Road station with Fire Chief
Allocate additional budget dollars to support Economic Develop initiatives The recommended plan responds to the challenges identified, aligns with the consultant’s recommendations, fits within a reasonable cost, and will enhance the organization’s efforts to move forward. The formation of the senior team located at the George St office, and the inherent move of the Public Works Manager was supported by the Public Works Manager as being the “right time” to move forward with this previously discussed concept. As an initial step, Council provided clear direction that they envisioned South Frontenac eventually seeking delegated authority for the approval of subdivisions and plans of condominiums. This definitive expectation, if granted, will require processes and resources to be put in place in order for South Frontenac to be prepared to assume this responsibility. Staff recommend that this change be targeted for an effective date in 2019. Following discussion on the Township’s role in planning, the CAO’s recommendations were debated. There was general support for the proposals, however it appeared there was an interest in dealing with approvals in yearly increments. On May 27 in a meeting with Warden Smith, CAO’s Pender and Orr, Councillor McDougall and Mayor Vandewal, staff shared the direction that Council was considering with regard to planning. This was seen as a positive step in the eyes of County representatives. The likelihood of achieving this change is not clearly predictable as it will require Provincial approval as well. FINANCIAL / STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: The costs and funding for the CAO’s recommendations that were presented on May 24 are outlined below:

Page 29 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT

Incremental Costs Wages and Benefits One time costs Equipment Vehicle Moving/furniture/cabling Operating Phone/Internet Economic Development Fuel/Maintenance Total

2016 (6 months) 62,100

2017

2018

96,000

98,000

6,700 0 2,500

6,100 0 500

5,100 45,000 500

600 0 0

330 10,000 0

330 10,000 3,000

71,900

112,930

161,930

Recognizing that the 2016 budget is set, and the need to balance the impact over two years, a portion of the funding for this is scheduled to come from reserves.

Funding Reserves Taxation

2016 71,900

2017 40,000 199,614

2018 201,930

ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Organizational Chart

Submitted/approved by: Wayne Orr, CAO

Prepared by: Wayne Orr, CAO

DRAFT Organizational Chart COUNCIL CAO / Deputy Clerk Executive Assistant Public Works Manaaer

Development Services Mgr. / \

Treasurer

Fire Chief

Vol Dep Chiefs

/ /

Arena/Rec Sup

Area Sup Op.

Area Sup Infra.

Seasonal Crew Arena Admin

Area Sup FSW Deputy Treasurer HR/Legislative

Clerk/Comm

Planner /Deputy

CBO

Clerk

Contracted Eco Dev Dollars

Train/Prev Officer

‘V

Lead Hands

Technical Assistant

Crew

Mechanic Admin

Accounting Clerk Crew

Treasury Clerks

Admin

Receptionist

Planning Assistant

2 Inspectors

Volunteers

Admin

Page 30 of 136

Page 31 of 136 Staff Report Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: June 7, 2016 Date of Report: May 31, 2016

Planning Department File No. RC-15/01

Subject: Review of Request for Road Closure Between Lots 6 & 7, Concession XIII; Storrington District, Township of South Frontenac: Ulrich Summary of Recommendation: The recommendation is that Council pass a by-law to stop up and close and transfer ownership of a portion of unopened road allowance to an abutting property-owner in the District of Storrington. Purpose of the report: The purpose of this report is to bring back Council an application for a road closure. A public meeting on the application was held on May 3, 2016 as required under the Municipal Act. The report includes a location attachment, a map illustrating the portion of road allowance to be closed and a by-law to effect the closure. Background The property-owner at 4197 Opinicon Road had requested to know whether Council would agree to the closure and sale of a portion of an unopened road allowance that runs through his property. Attachment #1 shows the unopened road allowance aligned through the subject land and Attachment #2 is an air photo of the subject land illustrating how the road allowance bisects the property. This attachment also shows 5 metre contour lines indicating the steepness of the land. The request came before the Committee of the Whole on June 2, 2015 where the Committee was generally favourable to the closure. Afterwards the proposal was advertised and it came to a public meeting on May 3, 2016. No objections to the closure and sale were received. Discussion The road allowance is aligned north/south from Opinicon Road extending 98 metres (321 ft.) through the owner’s land to Upper Rock Lake. It covers very challenging topography including steep rocky ridge leading to the water see contours on Attachment #2. The addition of the road allowance land would make the owner’s land more usable and valuable and, as shown on Attachment #2, a small cabin is located at least partially on the Township-owned road allowance. This issue would be resolved with the addition of the road allowance to the property. It should be noted that it is Council policy to not close road allowances that lead to any lake. However, at the May 3, 2016 public meeting Council agreed that this road allowance covers very challenging and steep topography and it seemed doubtful that this would ever be usable for water access by the public. Thus, Council appeared favourable the road closure in this case. At the public meeting there was discussion around the fact that the road allowance travels through the applicant’s property and continues south through another property. This is shown on the survey sketch prepared for the applicant indicated on Attachment #3 hereto. This southern property-owner expressed his wish to also obtain this portion of the road allowance to add to his property.

Page 32 of 136 However, it was determined that this should not hold up the subject application and the owner to the south has now agreed to make a separate request to obtain the portion of road allowance abutting his property. Agency Comments Public Works requires that the drainage ditch through the property be left unobstructed. This is acknowledged in the road closure by-law attached hereto. Conclusion It is apparent that the road allowance could not be useful to accommodate any future public access to the lake due to the extreme steepness of the land. As noted above, the addition of the road allowance as proposed would resolve the issue of the applicant’s cabin located partially on the Township land. Thus, the road allowance closure and transfer of ownership, as proposed, is supported by the Planning Department. For Council’s information, the By-law may be passed at this time but the actual land transfer would only take place when a deed is prepared to transfer the land. Staff will not stamp the deed until the applicant has paid the full cost of the land to the Township. The cost of the land is $22,854.00. The applicant’s agent has requested that the fee noted above should be reduced to $20,000.00. This is stated to be because the unopened road allowance does not actually touch the lake on the subject property but only leads to the lake further to the south. The Township’s by-law does not consider whether the road allowance touches the water but only states that a fee of $2.41 per square foot be applied anywhere within 300 feet of a waterbody. There is no basis to reduce the fee. A by-law to effect the closure and sale of the road allowance is attached as Bylaw # 2016-35. Recommendation It is recommended that Council pass By-law No. 2016-35 to close and sell a portion of unopened road allowance between Lots 6 & 7, Concession XIII, Storrington District, be passed. Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachments UlrichRoadClosingFinalReport

Page 33 of 136

Page 34 of 136

ATTACHMENT #2 l

l l

f f

/7kr%

,44g4,

l Q} f)

f I

l / /

J5mat l

/’?

L. /' #]

€

r4I

/ / f

6 ,; r Ul

/ /

/. ‘/Jl

l l

(l/

Subject Land ]

A A

gii m

W V’x’xV?

V,/

/ /

/ I

l I

@ m. Th

/ / /

‘,,

(g6 W:(,4

%AA41’i l? i

/ l

J (l

j r

Upper Rock Lake

/ /

‘W

/ /

tr JI s

1 l k

l l l

t t

l v

7 r

/ v

/01

//I

‘X

‘3-:

!:l 21

}

==’-=]

J k

Page 35 of 136

ATTACHMENT #3

I l

12-m

o==V’

ClONCE8SN€)N

ful

‘il %

‘A:

$Y :71 :ol

,?.%vaTmG"‘o.@

p" J6aa’Ol2>

‘I

l I

I l

‘,70-,

I l

1 ,n; / X

’m

l I

r O

%a,p,

Q’a4o’%=

lcq

, is

,76,,

A-

r o

ssa.‘a aseal

" 1

t4b

1 i

/’

localkini

/–

.,#y?

PIN 3628A-0122

l’

./,,/,//’ .!,,/,,,/’

drang0 HI.W%0

I’ (,;’

B o (/ld

.‘Q A

IQ/

;Hlm

l I

*Rli

??i 13

.,,,/!,/’

,t%. . ,A. ,???

IJh%%

A -.1

‘,p" ,]

/’

I I

(J? “..) u’

-,11 o

zJ 7,

-,)l

/’

‘0

’s

!5’.

%ll 4 ,5, .‘u 4 ‘?

,,i%

q l’s

, .

)E,

i’ 2% 14,4% lr re

l I

-JEi ij! iq ’ -O

?v l!

(5’

!2:1X-‘Z

Private Land to

the South

-l

l l l l

–l

1 l

-J

l I

‘u

Page 36 of 136 PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council

Planning Department

Agenda Date: June 7, 2016 Date of Report: May 30, 2016 Subject: Motion From Committee of Adjustment Re I-Pads

SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council receive the Planning Report dated May 30, 2016 and attachment for information and consider a motion to supply I-Pads to all Committee of Adjustment members PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a motion from the Committee of Adjustment to supply I-Pads to Committee members. BACKGROUND At the Committee of Adjustment meeting of May 12, 2016 a motion was brought forward to supply I-pads to all committee members for use at the Committee meetings. The motion included a requirement for training on the devices and the motion was carried. A copy of the motion is attached hereto. As discussed at the Committee meeting, some members had trouble accessing the winzip file attached to e-mails sent from the Planning Department containing the monthly agenda packages which include all reports, applications and maps. It was suggested that, rather than e-mailing the agendas, they should be posted on civic web in the same way as Council agendas are posted. The I-pads are required to facilitate this. It was also thought that the move to civic web would facilitate better accessibility for the public as well. RECOMMENDATION

Council is asked to consider approving the motion from the Committee of Adjustment to supply I-Pads for all committee members for use in the Committee of Adjustment. . Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachment CommitteeOfAdjustmentIPads

Page 37 of 136

16:?; : ?l..

RESOLUTION: C OF A: ?A

g!!31,yyL’! l

, S/?>l’l ri

bry q?’

Moved by:

Seconded by:

? l a?? " l?=a l g

%? .-

*’) it-

k2016

.S’Jeeffq

‘( ‘-j

(6’cov?5’ k=4-

THAT the South Frontenac. Township Committee of Adjustment herebyl’ j’!. ‘i’-?t s.xll lri ‘I’ € l’ lsit? !:1ffl’ l ?-41,}’l ‘k’-?S ?’l- “’-i?’ J

’llyi 1

{”

(

, z

CARRIED

DEFEATED

DEFERRED

CHAIR

RECORDED VOTES YES A. Revill

‘1

YES R, Sleeth

K. Gee

L. Redden

Di Hahn

W. Robinson

j. Sherbino

M. Schjerning

Page 38 of 136

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

May 31, 2016

Agenda Date:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: PW-PO1-2016 INSTALLATION OF NEW SAND/SALT STORAGE FACILITY AT STORRINGTON YARD RECOMMENDATIONS: That Council approve the bid of Strong Brothers Heating & Air Conditioning & General Contracting in the amount of $799,338.03, including the non-refundable HST portion, for the installation of a Sand/Salt Storage Facility at the Storrington Patrol yard; AND THAT an additional $300,000 be allocated from the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund AND THAT an additional $20,000 be allocated from the Building Condition Assessment project. BACKGROUND: A Tender was issued May 11th, 2016 for the installation of a new sand/sand storage facility at the Storrington Patrol Yard. Four bids were received and are shown in the chart below. The price includes the non-refundable HST portion COMPANY Storage Systems Construction Wemp & Smith Construction Ltd AWD Contractors Strong Bros. Heating, Air Conditioning & General Contracting Ltd.

BID $1,070,075.60 $954,335.84 $842,368.36 $799,338.03

ANALYSIS: The approved budget for this project is $500,000. We altered the original design to include a drive through loading bay for improved salt management. At the same time we have had to incur unforeseen cost escalation as a result of the Canadian dollar. An additional $20,000 is also required for contract administration. This Tender was configured for a lump sum bid which included the removal of the existing storage hut. Staff have considered retendering with a unit price bid but we would incur more design and contract administration costs. We could also re-budget for 2017 but there is no guarantee that costs will not increase next year. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: After consulting with the Treasurer, it has been determined that $300,000 is available in the Federal Gas Tax Reserve Fund. It should also be noted that the F.G.T. has financed all our new Sand/Salt Storage Facilities. The additional $20,000 can be financed from the Building Condition Assessment project which is under budget. Submitted/approved by:

Prepared by:

Mark Segsworth P. Eng. Public Works Manager

Jamie Brash, Supervisor Facilities & Solid Waste

Page 39 of 136

STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

PREPARED FOR COUNCIL:

May 25, 2016

AGENDA DATE:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Equipment and Material RFQ’s RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the purchase and rental of various construction material and equipment as per the attached 2016 Contractor Rental Rates and Material Prices contained in a Report to Council on June 7, 2016. BACKGROUND: Each year an RFQ is initiated for prices on equipment rental and construction materials. ANALYSIS: The results of this RFQ are attached. It should be noted that price is but one consideration when purchasing material and equipment. We also have to take into account proximity to our various worksites, availability and suitability of the material or equipment for the job at hand. FINANCIAL/STAFFING IMPLICATIONS: Sufficient funds have been budgeted for the purchase and rental of materials and equipment for our various maintenance and construction projects.

Attachment: 2016 Contractor Rental Rates and Material Prices

Submitted/approved by: Mark Segsworth, P. Eng. Public Works Manager

2016 Contractor Rental Rates (Hourly) - ATTACHMENT 1 Equipment

Larmon

Tandem

Hogan Exc $68.00

Bettschen

Gilbert’s

$85.00

$80.00

Percy $75.00

McNichols

Dig’n Dirt

$80.00

$85.00

Tandem Rock Truck 1 Ton Truck

$69.00

$75.00

Nedow

Crains’

$80.00

$85.00

Larson

Syd.

Milberry

Const’n

Landscape $73.00

$65.00

5 Ton

$65.00

Kenworth w dump trailer 35 MT Articulating off-highway dump truck

$95.00

Tri-Axle

Morven K. Mulrooney

$84.50 $95.00

1/2 Ton Truck

Sweet’s

Larry

$65.00

$115.00 $40.00

$35.00 $78.00

$100.00

$90.00

$80.00

$10.50 $85.00

$90.00

$80.00

Tri-Axle w Pup Tri-Axle Excavator Truck

$85.00

$110.00

$125.00

$85.00

$95.00

$80.00

$125.00

$85.00

$89.50

Single Axle

$70.00

Stone Slinger

$105.00

Water Truck

$92.50

$90.00

Belly Dump

$125.00

Excavators 200 John Deere

$160.00

160 Case

$160.00

KX080 Kubota

$130.00

$105.00

Kubota 121 with Hoe Ram

$150.00

Kubota -121

$85.00

Komatsu

$120.00

130 Excavator

$95.00

160 Excavator

$115.00

161 Kubota 6 Ton Mini Excavator 315 Excavator

$95.00 $89.00 $140.00

$110.00

305 Excavator

$95.00

308 Cat Excavator

$100.00

308 Cat Excavator w Hoe Ram

$160.00

330 Excavator C/W Hoe Ram

$310.00

$285.00

330 Excavator

$140.00 $145.00

$130.00

$120.00

320 Excavator C/W Hoe Ram

$325.00

$285.00

$265.00

$85.00

$135.00 $125.00

$125.00 $275.00

Page 40 of 136

320 Excavator (CAT)

$98.00

Larry Larmon

Hogan Exc

322 Excavator (CAT)

Bettschen

Gilbert’s

$155.00

Percy

McNichols

Dig’n Dirt

Sweet’s

Morven K. Mulrooney

Nedow

Crains’

Milberry

Larson

Syd.

Const’n Landscape

$155.00

322 Excavator (CAT) w Hoe Ram

$165.00

324 Cat

$120.00

324 Cat w Hoe Ram

$200.00

325 Excavator

$130.00

325 Excavator w Hoe Ram

$140.00 $265.00

140 Doosan 16 ton

$130.00

140 Doosan w hoe ram

$230.00

Kubota 8 ton

$100.00

Kubota

$65.00

$90.00

Kubota w Hoe Ram

$120.00

$105.00

336 Cat

$140.00

336 Cat w Hoe Ram

$230.00

Link Belt LB-80

$100.00

Link Belt LB-80 w Hoe Ram

$150.00

Link Belt LB-135

$110.00

Cat 420 Rubber Tired Hoe Cat 420 Rubber Tired Hoe w Hoe Ram

$82.50 $150.00

Liebherr 934

$150.00

Liebherr 944

$160.00

Liebherr 944 w Hoe Ram

$285.00

Dozers D3 Dozer or Equivalent

$105.00

$75.00

D5 Dozer or Equivalent

$95.00

$100.00

$85.00 $95.00

D5 Dozer w GPS Grade Control

$115.00

D5N Track Dozer

$125.00

Cat D6 Dozer or Equivalent 850 D Bulldozer

$140.00

$85.00

$145.00

$90.00

$145.00

850B Case

$120.00

650 K Case Dozer

$85.00

Case

$80.00

Graders

$100.00

$70.00

$115.00

$150.00

$100.00

Page 41 of 136

Graders

Backhoes

Larmon Hogan Exc

Bettschen Gilbert’s

Cat 416 Hoe

$95.00

Cat 416 Hoe w Hoe Ram

$200.00

420 Cat Backhoe 4X4 or Equivalent

$95.00

Case 580 Backhoe 4WD Tractor w loader/backhoe

Percy

McNichols Dig’n Dirt

Sweet’s

Morven K. Mulrooney Nedow

$95.00 $90.00

$75.00

Crains’

$85.00

$90.00

Larry

Larson

Syd.

Milberry

Const’n Landscape

$80.00

$85.00

$80.00

$85.00

$75.00

590

$85.00

Backhoe (Mini)

$45.00

Loaders John Deere

$85.00

Cat 943

$110.00

Cat 950

$120.00

Cat 924 or JD 544

$90.00

$100.00

Cat 966 or Liebherr L566

$175.00

$140.00

544J John Deere

$150.00

Cat 950

$135.00

$120.00

Loader

$110.00

3 Yard Bucket

$125.00

3.5 Yard Bucket

$130.00

$110.00

$150.00

4 Yard Bucket

On request

$95.00

5 Yard Bucket

On request

$100.00

6 Yard Bucket

On request

$115.00

On Request $130.00

$125.00

Floats Float

$125.00

$65.00

5 Ton Float 25 Ton Float

$135.00

50 Ton Float

$110.00

55 Ton Float

$125.00

$135.00

4 Axle

$125.00

3 Axle

$125.00

Bettschen Gilbert’s

Percy

McNichols Dig’n Dirt

Sweet’s

Morven K. Mulrooney Nedow

Crains’

Larson

Syd.

Milberry

Const’n Landscape

Page 42 of 136

Larmon Hogan Exc

Larry

Miscellaneous Flag Person

$19.50

$19.75

Labourer Hot Box w 2 Person Crew

$85.00

Skid Steer 259B Skid Steer

$240.00

$75.00 $90.00 $95.00

246 Skid Steer

$75.00

445 Case Skid Steer Vibratory Packer 56” Drum Roller Terex aggregate Crusher with stacker

$95.00

$75.00

$85.00 $300.00

Page 43 of 136

2016 Material Costs - ATTACHMENT 2 Cost Per Unit at Quarry or Pit Sydenham Material

Units

Hogan Exc

Sweet’s

Cruickshank $7.95

Bettschen

5/8" Crusher Run

Tonne

$8.75

$7.75

7/8" Crusher Run

Tonne

$8.65

$7.65

3" Crusher Run

Tonne

$8.20

$7.20

Shot Rock

Tonne

$6.60

$5.60

3/4" clean

Tonne

1" Clean

Tonne

Rubble

Tonne

$6.60

$5.60

$7.00

Dust

Tonne

$12.70

$10.75

$11.95

7/8" Clear

Tonne

$11.00

$11.75

Cr. Asphalt

Tonne

Recycled Asphalt

Tonne

Sandfill

Yard

Clay Fill

Yard

Clean Hydro Sand

Tonne

Gabion Stone HL 3 Stone

McNichols K. Mulrooney Landscape

Nedow

$8.40

Crains $8.50

$8.40

$7.50

$8.45

$7.45

$7.95

$7.00

$8.20

$5.70

$7.00

$6.00

$6.25

$10.25

$11.50

$9.00

$11.00 $6.25

$9.75 $10.00

$7.95

$8.00

$6.25

8/yd

$6.00

$5.25

$7.00

$6.25

6/yd

$5.00

$12.80

$12.25

$13.50

$6.25

9/yd

Tonne

$17.85

$19.95

Tonne

$20.35

$13.50

$82.00

$95.00

HL3 Hot Mix

$8.10

20/yd

$5.20 $5.20

30/yd $14.00

$12.95

Cold Mix Sand Seal QPR 6" Minus

Tonne

$7.80

$6.80

Tonne

$8.40

$7.40

Screen Topsoil

Yard

Location of Pit

$20.00

$7.90

$15.60 Westport Quarry Hot mix from

Battersea Quarry

$19.00

Leonards

$18.00

Harrowsmith Buck Bay Pit

10/yd

$18.00

Sydenham

30/yd

Tamworth

Page 44 of 136

Page 45 of 136

2015 Culvert Costs

Per Metre

320k Pa 320k Pa 320k Pa 320k Pa 320k Pa 320k Pa 320k Pa

HDPE Culverts

E.S. Hubbell

300 MM 375 MM 450 MM 525 MM 600 MM 750 MM 900 MM

$21.06 $33.08 $43.89 $55.28 $73.56 $109.54 $169.98

Armtec $18.12 $29.40 $39.17 $51.32 $64.18 $92.18 $131.12

Page 46 of 136

Corporate Services Committee

Minutes – April 15, 2016 – 10:30am

Present: Alan Revill, John McDougall, Ross Sutherland, Wayne Orr Item Topic Outcome / Recommendation 1 2 3

Declaration of Pecuniary interest Minutes Business Arising A. Notice Provision Bylaw review B. Desert Lake Causeway /Parking C. CofA appointment process D. Contractor Lease E. Septic Reinspection F. Sole Source and Vendors of record G. Sydenham Water D.U.E. review H. Fiscal Policies I. Trail costs

New Business A. 2016 community Grants

B. Supporting local business

Moved by JM Seconded by RS - Minutes of Mar 18, 2016 – CARRIED CSC reviewed in light of flow chart developed. CSC still wants to ensure SF Council is made aware early in the process. Committee agrees with changes around signage. Committee asked that a revised version be circulated to the local development committee for feedback before finalizing draft. On March 29, CRCA requested to forward a copy of the MNR license to fill beach with Sand outstanding Follow up with Tennant has taken place. Signed lease still outstanding To invite Tay Valley CBO and our CBO to the next meeting to discuss. CBO’s to connect in advance. To be brought forward to Council This review is to be brought forward in June of this year. To be developed, stemming from 2015 deficit Staff to be asked to invoice when these services requested from County. Moved by JM seconded by RS that 7 grants be approved under the policy. That 3 of the groups receive the maximum grant given that the policy had not been updated on website. That one group be declined as the event is outside of SF. That one group be supported but through a grant to the Arena in light of their newly formed status. CARRIED. Moved by RS seconded by JM that the committee was not in favor of bonusing local businesses. That staff should hold an annual education event prompted to all local vendors to explain the procurement process and to have staff investigate changes to the website so that vendors could subscribe to a news feed for all posted opportunities. CARRIED

Other Business •

None

Harrowsmith Junction

Next Meeting

Staff asked to confirm the process for land acquisition /rights for road construction in light of CRCA meeting schedule for the summer. Friday May 27,2016 at 10:30 am

Page 47 of 136 SOUTH FRONTENAC PORTLAND REC COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes –April 25th, 2016 Attendees: Dan Bell, Pam Morey, Cheryl Preston, John McDougall, Brenda Adams. Regrets: Mary Jo Dowker, Christine Leblanc

The minutes of March’s meeting were reviewed. Motion to accept by Cheryl Preston and seconded by Brenda Adams.
The Agenda for April 25th, 2016 meeting was reviewed. Motion to accept by Dan Bell and seconded by Pam Morey.
There was discussion on the business arising from the minutes: Business Arising from Minutes: •

•

An ad was place in the local paper calling for residents that would be interested in helping develop a Skate Board park in South Frontenac to attend the April 25th meeting of the Portland Recreation committee. A delegation of community members attended this meeting to speak on the issue of development of a skate board park in South Frontenac possibly at Centennial Park. The members of the delegation included: Ethan Folds, Lana Foulds, Brenda Taylor (Golden Links hall), Sharon Rattray (Golden Links Hall), Brody Chabot, Carter Compton, Chris Chabot, Grahame White, Harley Clow, Ian White, Jordon Schaub, Amanda Collier. This delegation was very much interested in being involved in all steps necessary to make a skate board park a reality in South Frontenac. Several items were discussed including; fundraising, involvement of local service groups, possible sponsorships, cost, location, liability, safety, and other pads in the Kingston and surrounding area. They would like to take part in the feasibility study as well as planning, fundraising, grants, and recruiting of necessary products needed for building. This group would like to form a committee to further investigate all aspects involved to make this happen. A motion was made by Pam Morey to present this interest to the Central Recreation Committee for a motion to council to consider and recommend that a feasibility study be done to further investigate the possibility of a Skate board park in South Frontenac, Centennial Park area. The motion was seconded by Cheryl Preston. All were in favor. A Central recreation update was given on Ice stock in the community, grass cutting and the sport camp for the summer at McMullen Park and recreation survey.

New Business: •

Canada Day at Centennial Park. A motion was made by Cheryl Preston to accept the letter sent by the Harrowsmith Social and Athletic Club asking for permission from this committee to use Centennial Park for their Canada Day Celebrations to be held on July 1st, 2016. This motion was seconded by Dan Bell, all were in favor. This motion is to be forwarded to council for their approval.

Meeting was adjourned at 8:30. Our next will be held at the Princess Anne building in Hartington at 7:00, Monday, May 30th.

Page 48 of 136

Loughborough District Recreation Committee Minutes -<

Monday, April 25,20J&

Attendance: Chair Mike Howe, Councillor Ross Sutherland, Councillor Mark Schjerning, Paul Wash, Norm Irwin, Tracy Holland, Vicki Vefdman, Terra Gower, Randy Ruttan Regrets: MaryanneTakala, Helen Parfitt

Approval of the Agenda .

Motion to approve the agenda. Moved by: Tracy Holland Seconded by: Paul Wash Carried

Approval of Minutes - Monday, February 22,2016 . Motion to approve the minutes from Monday, February 22, 2016 as amended. Moved by: Tracy Holland Seconded by: Paul Wash Caffted
Business Arising a. Canada Day Update

Tb^ Canada ©ay Sub-Committee is meetm^ regylarl.y tq fin.al.ize gl.ans for this year’s event.

There will be a training session for the face painters as the volunteers last year were concerned about their level of knowledge and skills.

There will be 3 bands instead of 4 this year as it is time consuming for bands to set up and take down their equipment.

Joanne Barr is the website coordinator and is looking for pictures or content that might be useful.

The next meeting will be held on May 26 at the Sydenham Library. b. South Frontenac Recreation Committee

Tim Laprade is working on a survey for communrtyfeedback on recreation in the

township. Please send any questions you would like added to the survey to Tim as soon as possible.

The South Frontenac Township Recreation Guide 2016 unfortunately displayed last years’ registration dates for many of the user groups. c. Harris Park

No news to report: at this time. d. Bowes Park

The baseball season begins on May 8th

Page 49 of 136

There was noticeable increase in baseball registration this year. Chair Mike Howe

requested registration numbers be provided to give the committee an idea of how many

children in the area are involved in baseball.

There was a discussion regarding the reasons behind replacing the playground equipment as it was not requested. e. Wilmer Park

Terra Gower emailed T>m laprade about the fence along the road being repaired or

replaced. He indicated that it is not a capital item for 2016 but he will look into what, if

anything, can be done this year.

TTiere was a discussion about capital and maintenance items not being incorporated

into the budget and that alternate plans are made without consulting the district committees. Councillor RQSS Sutherland explained that there will be 9 time in November

during budget rfeftberatrons where the pubKc can come to Councit and give their

comments and or concerns about the budget.

TheLoughborough District Recreation Committee recommends that, prior to submitting the 2017 Capital Budget, staff meets with the South Frontenac Recreation Committee and the local district committees for discussion and review. f. The Point Park

Chair Mike Howe met with Jamie Brash and Mark Segsworth to discuss the fencing the football field. Traditional fencing will need to be installed in order to properly protect the field from vandalism. A public meeting will be held to discuss the decision to install this type of fencing around the field.

The committee discussed moving the temporary fencing in order for the public to have room to wstch th&fireworks at The Point on Canada Day.

TTie shoreline restoration project should be completed by the Victoria Day weekend. New netting is needed for the baseball diamond.

g. Capital Budget for Loughborough 2016 No additional news to report. h. Central Soccer

The soccer field at Keetey will not be used again this year.

Grass will be requested to be cut on Fridays so that the fields can be lined after.

There is a total of 339 children registered to play soccer this year with 149 open spots v

remaining.

U10 and U12 will play in a mini tournament is weekend to assist in team balancing.

Very few registered for U15 and U18. I.

Triathlon

No news to report at this time. .

Minor Football

Randy Ruttan was present as the new representative for Sydenham Minor Football.

There ar^ 5 teams playing on various fields and almost 500 ptayers in the league with % of them being from Sydenham.

k. Sydenham Canoe Club No news to report.

Loughborough District Recreation Committee Minutes: Monday, April 25, 2016

Page 2

Page 50 of 136

New Business

a. Township Recreational. Survey

A draft of the survey will be |?rought to the committee for review once it is availahie. b. Volunteer of the Year Award

Please refer tp the township we^sftf* fpr informstiQn on how and when to nominste g

votunteer for this award.

c. Summer Program

The program coordinator and the site coordinators have all been hired.

Next Meeting: Monday, May 30, 2016 @ 6:30 p.m. (Parks Tour begins at Harris Park)

Adjournment: 8:10 p.m. Recording Secretary: Sarah Vandewal

Loughborough District Recreation Committee Minutes: Monday, April 25,2016

Page 3

Page 51 of 136 Storrington District Recreation Committee Monday April 25th, 2016, 7:00 pm, Sunbury MINUTES OF MEETING CALL TO ORDER- 7:02 pm ATTENDANCE- Alvin Wood, Norm Roberts, Kevin Fox, Ellwood Rollins, Annie Campbell, Roberta Smith, Dave Fisher, John Kot, Amanda Pantrey DELEGATIONS- None APPROVAL OF AGENDAKevin moved to approve the agenda, as amended, seconded by John Carried APPROVAL OF MINUTES- The minutes from both February and March were reviewed and approved this meeting because February’s minutes were not available for approval at the March meeting. Ellwood moved to approve the minutes from February 22nd, 2016, as amended, seconded by Annie Carried th Kevin moved to approve the minutes from March 28 , 2016, as amended, seconded by Annie Carried CHAIR REMARKS- Thanks to Kevin for chairing the last few meetings while Alvin was gone, great job! BUSINESS ARISINGStorrington Retirees- There are still lights out in the kitchen. Norm gave Roberta the keys to the cabinets and Sharon designed a sign in/out sheet for them. The top cabinets do not have locks on them so anyone can use them. It is suggested that a map be drawn up so we know who has each cupboard. Roberta will be the key-keeper and the list and map will be kept in the retirees cupboard. The music cupboard was unlocked Friday night, so John changed the lock. The receipt can go to Jamie for reimbursement. The Fire Department took coffee maker to Sydenham and never returned it. It is agreed that it should not leave the centre, and it will be added to the hall letter by Alvin. The garbage was not collected on Thursday. Norm will call Jamie about this. Baseball- Season should start in the next few weeks. Annie is not in control of user fees or field scheduling. Alvin will ask Tim and Christine Bertrim to see if they know who is. Soccer- 506 + kids registered this year! Within 1-2 kids before they will have to start turning kids away. Horseshoes- The registration is to be on the first Tuesday of May. Thanks to Norm for the

Page 52 of 136 use of his shop and equipment to build the new pits. They will need sand for the new pits. Norm ordered the port-a-potty for Dave. Pumpkin Festival- The first planning meeting for the festival will be May 1st for anyone who wants to join. Additional Cleaning- It is suggested that the Storrington Centre should be cleaned two times a week instead of once. Since Sarah is Jamie’s employee, he will determine if there is a need for more cleaning and if Sarah can’t do it, who will. It is agreed by the committee that Sarah should have first priority of the new cleaning shifts. Roberta motions to have the hall cleaned twice a week, seconded by John. Carried Canada Day- Alvin ordered the tents, he will need a hand Thursday setting up the stage. Chuckles the Clown will be at the park from 2:30-4:30, costing $160 taxes and supplies included. She will need a table and some chairs. Roberta will send the invoice to Alvin who will send it to Tim. Roberta will finish the food permit. Bill Hinch is on board for shore chips. Mike Mundel is booked elsewhere. Roberta called the Seeley’s Bay Legion regarding their Church BBQ but has not got a reply yet. Roberta will call Garrets and Gilmores to see if they are available for the evening. If they are available, we need to know if they have their own food permits or if the committee needs to get them. Roberta has the vendor list from the Pumpkin Festival, she will call around and see if a market can be established for the day. We will need to know who needs hydro, the vendors need to bring their own extension cords. The petting zoo is booked. Alvin will do the road closure application for the parade. Alvin will also contact the OPP. Annie will tell the time to the fire department, as well as ask if they can do beef on a bun. Ellwood will coordinate the parade. Taya Williams will sing the National Anthem. Cake is good to go. Roberta will ask Ron Sleeth if the Dairy Association can participate. Amanda will ask Catherine Reynolds if she can do story telling again this year. Alvin is getting the face painting volunteers together. Alvin will talk to Mark about the parking barriers. Thanks again to Kevin for the grant application and firework organization. Texas Tuxedo has booked another show and is unavailable. Since they did the whole sound system in the past, we will ask the band that is booked to use their sound system, if not we will have to rent it. John will ask around for other bands to play. The horseshoe tournament is a go, as is the soccer tournament. It is getting too late to start designing a new brochure this year with sponsorship. We shall start in October or November for 2017. For this year, we will ask local business for $50 for a business card size advertisement, we can fit about 8 businesses. Amanda will ask local businesses. We will advertise the festivities on local business road signs. SOUTH FRONTENAC RECREATION COMMITTEE- Secretary honorarium has been raised to $65 retroactive until January 2016. The meeting minutes and agenda are now to be submitted to the township in PDF format, with 12 point Arial font with no underlining. 5 YEAR RECREATION PLAN SURVEY- Tim needs the ideas for the surveys back by May 12th. The answers to the questions will guide the direction for recreation for the next few years. COUNCIL REPORT- There will be a town hall meeting in July. Date to be announced. The township hired a consultant last year and the report will be reviewed at the meeting.

Page 53 of 136 NEW BUSINESS- May 16th is the due date for nominations for volunteer awards. Annie had an issue booking the hall last month. It was suggested that a new public booking system be put in place. Alvin will talk to Jamie to see if an improved system can be put in place. OTHER BUSINESS- None. NEXT MEETING- The next meeting will be May 30th, 2016 at 7:00 pm in Sunbury. Ellwood made a motion for adjournment at 8:31 pm Carried

Page 54 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-20 BEING A TOWNSHIP-INITIATED HOUSEKEEPING BY-LAW TO AMEND BYLAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO EFFECT A NUMBER OF CHANGES TO CORRECT MAPPING ERRORS THAT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND TO CLARIFY THE WORDING OF PARTS OF THE TEXT. WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac passed the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 on September 16, 2003; AND WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to mapping errors and unclear wording in the text of the document that have been identified; AND WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS BEDFORD DISTRICT

THAT Schedule “D” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zoning in Part Lots 25 & 26, Concession X from Limited Service Residential-Waterfront (RLSW) to Waterfront Residential (RW) as shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “1”; (it is accessed by a public road) LOUGHBOROUGH DISTRICT
THAT Schedule “B” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zoning in Part Lot 7, Concession V from Special Recreational Resort Commercial (RRC-19) to Limited Service Residential Waterfront (RLSW) as shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “2” (it’s in a residential area on a private lane.).
THAT Schedule “B” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zoning in Part Lots 20 and 21 Concession VII from Community Facility (CF) Zone to Special Community Facility (CF-2) Zone as shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “2” (it’s the Greek Orthodox Church Camp).
THAT Schedule “B” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zoning in Part Lot 10, Concession XII from Rural (RU) Zone to Community Facility (CF) Zone as shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “2” (Boy Scouts Camp). STORRINGTON DISTRICT
THAT Schedule “C” to Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the zoning in Part Lot 20, Concession X from Rural (RU) Zone to Limited Service ResidentialWaterfront (RLSW) Zone as shown on the attached map designated as Schedule “3” (Zoning does not match lot lines).

TEXT CHANGES

Page 55 of 136 6. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the definition of “Mobile Home” by deleting reference to the Ontario Building Code Act so that the definition reads as follows: “MOBILE HOME” shall mean any dwelling that is designed to be made mobile, and constructed or manufactured in accordance with CSA standards for mobile homes to provide a permanent residence for one or more persons, but does not include a modular home or travel trailer as defined herein.” 7. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the definition of “Top-of-Bank” by deleting the second sentence in its entirety and replacing it with a new second sentence to read “ when there are two(2) or more slopes located together, separated by plateaus, the slope that is the closest to the water is considered for the top-of-bank calculation” so that the definition reads as follows: “TOP OF BANK (Slope) shall mean a point which is the beginning of a significant change in the land surface, then from which the land surface slopes downward (at a grade of 30% or more) towards an abandoned or existing waterbody or watercourse. When there are two (2) or more slopes located together separated by plateaus, the slope that is the closest to the water is considered for the top-of-bank calculation.” 8. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the definition of “Building Height” by inserting the word “average” immediately following the words “vertical distance between the” so that the definition reads as follows: “BUILDING HEIGHT shall mean the vertical distance between the average established grade and the highest point of the building or structure but does not include chimneys antennas or other similar objects.” 9. THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended is hereby further amended by changing the permitted uses in the Urban Industrial section 21.2 by deleting auto body repair shop from the list of permitted uses and by changing section 21.3.1 by reducing the maximum permitted height of a principal building from 15 metres (50 ft.) to 11 metres (36 ft.).

THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, either on the date of passage or as otherwise provided by section 34. Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this fifteenth day of March, 2016. Read a first and second time this fifteenth day of March, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this seventh day of June, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 56 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

(BEDFORD DISTRICT) <es"i% SCHEDULE ‘1’ BY-LAW No. 2016-20

fl? -m

(?filr

‘!?”’ ???" ?

B AREA REZONED FROM ‘RLSW’ TO ‘RW’

.?r

mE-

sBl(

Woll* lah*

$ 4’

O+S 4’

’m

0% A

IE ,,yoyD

Mo+*rs-l o so no

]

240

aeo

480 l

THIS IS SCHEDULE ‘T’ TO BY-LAW No. 2016-20

PASSED THIS 7’h DAY OF JUNE, 2016. MAYOR CLERK

Page 57 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

(LOUGHBOROUGH DISTRICT) SCHEDULE ‘2’

BY-LAW No. 2016-20

§ AREA REZONED FROM IRUI TO lcr:l s AREA REZONED FROM ICFI TO ‘CF-2’

-,?

riJ ‘.-a/

§ AREA REZONED FROM ‘RRC-19’ TO ‘RLSW’

?=4

(F A

‘-,

0, €

/ *t2

x),5

,,61

tff FI ANr) ff

[ “-”

I 11

? ROAD l

/I Q

C’ L!a L :) o

THIS IS SCHEDULE ?2? TO BY-LAW No. 2016-20 PASSED THIS 7’h DAY OF JUNE, 2016. MAYOR

CLERK

Page 58 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

(STORRINGTON D?STRICT)

SCHEDULE ‘3’ BY-LAW No. 2016-20

p? q,

??{ 41

D AREA REZONED FROM ‘RU’ TO ‘RLSW’

l’l?ffi’l

E <

11 11

t 11

l /Q

SQ &

V? 5’

(

r -l

+a-a

r. l’ it ri L) 4V’ 4

cranbfil

la? lo 90 {80

y,,2"

THIS IS SCHEDULE ?3" TO BY-LAW No. 2016-20

PASSED THIS 7’h DAY OF JUNE, 2016. MAYOR

CLERK

Page 59 of 136 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-35

BEING A BY-LAW TO STOP UP, CLOSE AND SELL A PORTION OF AN UNOPENED ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 6 AND 7, CONCESSION XIII, STORRINGTON DISTRICT: ULRICH

WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac may pass a bylaw to stop up, close and sell any highway or part thereof pursuant to the Municipal Act, section 34(l):

AND WHEREAS pursuant to the Township of South Frontenac’s Notice By-law No. 2002-92, the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac caused to be advertised the proposal to close the said road allowance: AND WHEREAS the said road allowance is not used as a publically travelled road: AND WHEREAS no objections have been received to the road closing: NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH

FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

THAT the portion of road allowance in Concession XIII, lying between Lots 6 and 7; in the District of Storrington, shown as Part 2 on Schedule 1, attached hereto and forming part of this by-law, shall be stopped up and closed and ownership transferred to the abutting property-owner on the east and west sides in Lots 6 and 7, Concession XIII;
THAT the existing drainage course that is aligned north and south through the subject property shall remain un-obstructed;

THAT the Mayor and Clerk/Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute such documents as are required; and

THAT this By-law shall come into force and take effect upon registration of this By-law.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this seventh day of June, 2016. Read a first and second time this seventh day of June, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this seventh day of June, 2016.

THE CORPORATION OF THE

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 60 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC SCHEDULE ‘1’ BY-LAW No. 2016-35

X ?" aaa?012?

t€

%!a"8’

‘?’lo-,

r o

“?

’l p i 1 T) l l l I F, l I 1 1 1 I l

! ;

%l'47

{ #/,6

,ffi

l l

r o +a

PART 3 PIN 36260122

kea?d

dnmg??

7/,,,-’

b,7

P-I

t }

fAe %z?6gg’

,6a t,;o j

/ / 41

‘%4P’ /

-Jl al

1,41

/’-)<

?‘io

its, S

4,=

[7, a’

/’

ll %d.‘aA, O

l -% “y l

l d.

,Q 6

THIS IS SCHEDULE ?1? TO BY-LAW No. 2016-35

PASSED THIS 7? DAY OF JUNE, 2016. MAYOR CLERK

Page 61 of 136 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW NUMBER 2016-36 BEING A TOWNSHIP-INITIATED HOUSEKEEPING BY-LAW TO AMEND BYLAW NUMBER 2003-75, AS AMENDED, TO CLARIFY THE WORDING OF SECTION 5.10.2 AND DELETE WORDING FROM SECTION 5.11. WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac passed the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law No. 2003-75 on September 16, 2003; AND WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac deems it expedient to amend By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, as it relates to unclear wording in the text of the document that have been identified; NOW THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS

THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting a new sentence into section 5.10.2, immediately following the first sentence that ends with the word “height” to read “Reconstruction of the building is prohibited.” so that the section reads as follows: “Where a building has been erected prior to the date of passing of this By-law on an existing lot and said building has less than the minimum 30 metre (98.4 ft.) setback from the highwater mark of a waterbody or watercourse, then said building may be repaired, renovated or strengthened to a safe condition provided there is no enlargement of the gross floor area or increase in height. Reconstruction of the building is prohibited. In addition, no living space shall be added below grade to any existing building or structure.” Also a new sentence is added to read as follows: “For the purposes of interpreting section 5.10.2, once more than fifty percent of the exterior load-bearing walls of a structure located within the minimum 30 metre setback have been removed, the land is deemed to be vacant and the structure may not be reconstructed within the 30 metre setback.”
THAT Zoning By-law Number 2003-75 as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the words in the first sentence of section 5.11 that read “or demolition permit required by the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac or other authority for safety, health or sanitation requirements , providing such building or structure is serviced by potable water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the appropriate authority.” so that the whole section reads as follows: “5.11 REPLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES A building or structure, including a legal non-conforming and/or legal non-complying building or structure, may be replaced with a new building or structure in the case of partial or complete destruction caused by fire, lightning, explosion, tempest, flood or act of God. A building permit will only be issued, in the absence of zoning relief, provided no enlargement of the footprint or increase in gross floor area is proposed and provided the permit is applied for within 12 months of the partial or complete demolition/destruction. The replacement building shall be located on and not increase the footprint or gross floor area of the non-conforming/non complying building. The applicant shall provide proof to the satisfaction of the Chief Building

Page 62 of 136 Official that there will be no increase in the size of the building footprint or gross floor area and that the replacement building will be located within the same footprint as the non-conforming/noncomplying building. Where applicable, floodproofing and avoidance of erosion hazards should be considered.”

THIS BY-LAW shall come into force in accordance with section 34 of the Planning Act, 1990, either on the date of passage or as otherwise provided by section 34.

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Clerk-Administrator

Page 63 of 136

Payment Listing For the period of May 18, 2016 to June 7, 2016

Accounts Payable Payment Listing: For the period of May 18, 2016 to June 7, 2016

750,889.07

Payroll Payment Listing: Pay Period #11

Pay date May 25, 2016 For the period of May 8, 2016 to May 21, 2016

Council Honorarium

Pay date May 31, 2016

Total Payments

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Council receive for information the listing of the Accounts Payable and Payroll for the period ending June 7, 2016 in the amount of

847,398.55

Submitted/approved by: Suzanne Quenneville - Deputy-Treasurer Louise Fragnito - Treasurer

86,702.74 9,806.74

847,398.55

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

Ranges: Cheque Date:

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

8:39:30 AM

From: 5/18/2016

To: 6/7/2016

Page:

Page 64 of 136

Distribution Types Included: PURCH, MISC

10 GG 0000 Gen Cheque EFT000000005521

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

04047129

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. PEST CONTROL

61052 61089

THE FRONTENAC NEWS MAY 20TH ADVERTISING MAY 26TH ADVERTISING

3840555

METROLAND MEDIA GROUP APRIL ADVERTISING

Total EFT000000005521 EFT000000005550 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005550 EFT000000005574 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005574

Total Gen

Amount $161.55 $161.55 $613.80 $609.93 $1,223.73 $2,387.69 $2,387.69

$3,772.97

1000 Cheque 067537

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

6/7/2016

Total 067542 EFT000000005589

REPAIR SIGN AT VERONA CLINIC

$350.00 $350.00

SANDING TOWN HALL

$71.23 $71.23

SNIDER, PERCY 16/03/24-18

Total 067538 067542

Amount

SHEPHERD, KRIS 2016013

Total 067537 067538

Description

6/7/2016 248953

TOM’S LAWN CARE MAY LAWN CARE

11186228

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. TANK INSPECTION

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005589

Total

$254.40 $254.40 $241.68 $241.68

$917.31

1100 Counc Cheque 067500 Total 067500 067531 Total 067531 067543

Date 5/26/2016

6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

CASEMENT, JOYCE 16/05/26-MEALS 75 MEALS @ 18.00 EMP APPREC NORTHERN FRONTENAC COMM SERVICES 2016 COMM GRANT 2016 COMMUNITY GRANT

6/7/2016

5/18/2016

Total EFT000000005513 EFT000000005576 6/7/2016

Amount $1,350.00 $1,350.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00

TROPHY HOUSE 9039 9189

Total 067543 EFT000000005513

Description

NAME PLATES OUTDOOR APPRECIATION PLAQUE

ASSOC OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONT FORT MCMURRAY SUPPORT FOR FORT MCMURRAY FRONTENAC COMMUNITY ARENA 2016 COMM GRANT 2016 COMM GRANT-FRONT’AC BALL

Total EFT000000005576

Total Counc

$36.02 $61.06 $97.08 $500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00

$5,947.08

1250 Clk Cheque EFT000000005537

Date 6/7/2016

Inv #

Description

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000046170 MAY EAP

Total EFT000000005537 EFT000000005570 6/7/2016 7682 Total EFT000000005570

Vendor

MALROZ ENGINEERING INC. PROF SERV JAN 1 - APR 30/16

Amount $251.55 $251.55 $10,631.23 $10,631.23

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005581

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

6/7/2016 77793

PRINTFUSION INC. 11000 NEWSLETTERS @ $.5864

8922 8122 9857 2884 2877

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND COFFEE, CREAM CREAM CREAM CREAM CREAM

59659

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE COFFEE POT & FILTERS

Total EFT000000005581 EFT000000005594 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005594 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005595

Total Clk

Page:

Page 65 of 136 $656.40 $656.40 $21.06 $4.39 $2.69 $5.38 $8.07 $41.59 $21.86 $21.86

$11,602.63

1275 Fin Cheque EFT000000005522

Date 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005522 EFT000000005578 6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

ALLAN & PARTNERS LLP IAA-SOUFRO-36978 AUDIT SERVICES IAA-SOUFRO-36978 AUDIT SERVICES PATHFIVE I-D00134 I-D00134 BALANCE

75% REC MGMT PLATFORM 25% REC MGMT PLATFORM

Total EFT000000005578

Amount $7,896.58 -$14,002.18 -$6,105.60 $5,342.40 $1,780.80 $7,123.20

Total Fin

$1,017.60

Total GG

$23,257.59

20 PP&P 2100 Fire Cheque 067514

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 16/05/27-27

Total 067514 067529

6/7/2016

Vendor

GRANT’S NO FRILLS SKID OF WATER

Total 067530 067534 Total 067534 067535 Total 067535 067538

6/7/2016

MAY MOWING

4741

NORTH COUNTRY MARINE ADAPTER

16/04/30-39

ORMSBEE’S MERCANTILE PIZZA & POP

20160042267

RECEIVER GENERAL RADIO LICENCES RADIO LICENCE

6/7/2016

4 HRS @ $95 & FLOAT

05521828 05445481

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. MAY PEST CONTROL MAY PEST CONTROL

433765

FIRE SERVICE MANAGEMENT BUNKER GEAR MAINTENANCE

41283

INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES FAX EXTENSION CORD

Total EFT000000005521 EFT000000005545 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005545 EFT000000005556 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005556 EFT000000005563 6/7/2016

$250.00 $250.00 $22.44 $22.44 $83.85 $83.85 $663.00 $663.00 $483.36 $483.36 $42.60 $34.53 $77.13 $133.61 $133.61 $40.64 $40.64

LEONARD FUELS 3935-699407

Total EFT000000005563 EFT000000005564 6/7/2016 16/05/16-44 Total EFT000000005564

$165.48 $165.48

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05/13-30

Total 067538 EFT000000005521

Amount

NOONAN, MIKE 16/05/15

Total 067529 067530

Description

GRANBY 4500L DOUBLE WALL TANK LEONARD, ELIZABETH 1 CLEAN @ $60

$966.72 $966.72 $60.00 $60.00

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005567

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

6/7/2016 54294801

Total EFT000000005567 EFT000000005568 6/7/2016

LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 OXYGEN

Page:

Page 66 of 136 $330.00 $330.00

LONDRY ALARMS 184675

Total EFT000000005568 EFT000000005584 6/7/2016

ANNUAL ALARM MONITORING

596931 596929

ROSEN ENERGY GROUP 1021.0L @ $.9550 235.2L @ $.7440

10726 10725

R. THURSTON TECHNOLOGIES RESOLVE REPEATER FAILURE REPEATER TESTING

247653 247676

SAFEDESIGN APPAREL LTD. FIRE BOOTS GLOVES

202035 59814

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE REPELLENT HOSE NOZZLE

TCL-150867 02/09/16

TURRIS COMMUNICATIONS LTD PAGER REPAIRS PAGER REPAIRS

16110

W.R. BRIGHTMAN & SON LIMITED RELOCATE PANIC BAR

Total EFT000000005584 EFT000000005585 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005585 EFT000000005586 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005586 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005595 EFT000000005597 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005597 EFT000000005608 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005608

Total Fire

$268.65 $268.65 $992.23 $178.07 $1,170.30 $1,081.20 $432.48 $1,513.68 $299.66 $372.06 $671.72 $73.20 $15.25 $88.45 $50.88 $50.88 $101.76 $231.50 $231.50

$7,322.29

2105 Pub Ed Cheque EFT000000005546

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 IN144462

Vendor

Description

FIRE MARSHAL’S PUBLIC FIRE SPARKY KEY RINGS

Total EFT000000005546

Total Pub Ed

Amount $258.22 $258.22

$258.22

2400 Police Cheque 067525

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-POLICE SERVICES MAY POLICE SERVICES

Amount

Total 067525

$244,876.00 $244,876.00

Total Police

$244,876.00

17120516039

2605 Build Cheque 067526

Total 067526 EFT000000005571

Date 6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

MINISTER OF FINANCE-INVEST & ENFORCE 1-2016-1-1UA-86 INVESTIGATIONS 3-2016-1-1UA-86 2496 RUTLEDGE UNIT 3

6/7/2016 34838

MARCHANT MARKING DEVICES LTD. SELF INKING STAMP

Total EFT000000005571

Total Build

Amount $1,325.00 $265.00 $1,590.00 $45.73 $45.73

$1,635.73

2620 Anml Ctl Cheque EFT000000005549

Date 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005549 EFT000000005561 6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-AC-2016-APRIL APRIL ANIMAL CONTROL SF-AC-2016-MAY MAY ANIMAL CONTROL KINGSTON HUMANE SOCIETY SF_KHS POUND_16_04 ANIMAL AT LARGE FEES SF_KHS POUND_16_04 ADMINISTRATION FEE

Amount $3,256.19 $3,256.19 $6,512.38 -$300.00 -$150.00

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT SF_KHS POUND_16_04 SF_KHS POUND_16_04 SF_KHS POUND_16_04 SF_KHS POUND_16_04

BOARDING FEE COLLECTED DOG TAG SALES DOG TAG SALE COMMISSION BOARDING FEES

Total EFT000000005561

Total Anml Ctl

Page:

Page 67 of 136 -$100.00 -$30.00 $8.00 $1,125.00 $553.00

$7,065.38

2640 Bylaw enf Cheque EFT000000005549

Date 6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC MUNICIPAL LAW SF-B-2016-APRIL 23 HRS @ $22.50 SF-B-2016-APRIL 640 KMS @ $.52 SF-P-2016-APRIL 20 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2016-APRIL 1200 KMS @ $.52 SF-P-2016-MAY 20 HRS @ $22.50 SF-P-2016-MAY 1200 KMS @ $.52

Total EFT000000005549

Total Bylaw enf

Amount $526.61 $338.66 $457.92 $634.98 $457.92 $634.98 $3,051.07

$3,051.07

Total PP&P

$264,208.69

30 Trans 3000 PW OH Cheque 067539 Total 067539 EFT000000005551

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

16/05/31-TIRE

SOLE, SHARON M. INSURANCE CLAIM - TIRE

DEAL #22441

GANANOQUE CHEVROLET BUICK GMC FT49-2010 GMC SIERRA-S/N 20874

7672 7672

TROUSDALE’S FOODLAND MEETING EXPENSES MEETING EXPENSES

196079

UPPER CANADA OFFICE SYSTEMS 16/05/26 - 16/08/26

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005551 EFT000000005594 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005594 EFT000000005599 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005599

Total PW OH

Amount $183.17 $183.17 -$5,596.80 -$5,596.80 $59.57 $55.61 $115.18 $62.06 $62.06

-$5,236.39

3005 RdAdmOH Cheque 067533 Total 067533 EFT000000005526

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

38780

ONTARIO GOOD ROADS ASSOCIATION ROADWAY MGMT - S WARREN

19869 19915

BAYRIDGE PRINTER PROS PLOTTER REPAIRS PLOTTER REPAIRS

77376

PRINTFUSION INC. BUSINESS CARDS

629 629 629

PRO-TECH TRAINING 10 GROUNDSKEEPER COURSE 10 TRAFFIC CONTROL TRAINING 12 FUELS SAFETY TRAINING

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005526 EFT000000005581 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005581 EFT000000005582 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005582

Total RdAdmOH

Amount $885.31 $885.31 $401.95 $152.64 $554.59 $46.81 $46.81 $1,221.12 $763.20 $427.39 $2,411.71

$3,898.42

3010 Cap/Equip/Ptrl Cheque 067503

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 IOOO6631 IOOO6634

Total 067503

Vendor

Description

ATCO CHEMICAL CORP. QUICKIE WIPES ARMOREX WIPES, POP UP SWIPES

Amount $770.27 $1,335.35 $2,105.62

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

067504

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

6/7/2016 024547 042496

Total 067504 067506 Total 067506 067510 Total 067510 067511 Total 067511 067514 Total 067514 067515 Total 067515 067532

6/7/2016

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE SHINGLES, UTILITY KNIFE, NAILS SEAL

BOB MARK NEW HOLLAND SALES LTD 043016 FIN CHG CHARGES

6/7/2016 1012

FIVE STAR FIRE PROTECTION 10LB FIRE EXTINGUISHER

3057

FOSTER EQUIPMENT LTD. REPLACE WORN HYDRAULIC PUMP

16/05/27-27

GRANT’S NO FRILLS 2 SKIDS OF WATER

020/40093085

GROENEVELD LUBRICATION SOLUTIONS GREENLUBE, FILLER PUMP KIT

6/7/2016

6/7/2016 503154 505191 505267

Total 067536 067538

6/7/2016

110.07T SHOT ROCK @ $6.95 REVELL FORD LINCOLN CHECK CAUSE OF ENGINE LIGHT ON WHEEL BEARING, PAN GASKET OIL CHANGE, TRANSMISSION PAN

Total 067541 EFT000000005520

Page 68 of 136 $79.25 $4.37 $83.62 $29.25 $29.25 $65.63 $65.63 $7,015.21 $7,015.21 $330.96 $330.96 $306.80 $306.80 $778.44 $778.44 $38.67 $1,461.98 $357.97 $1,858.62

SNIDER, PERCY 16/08/19-31 16/05/26-36 16/05/19-28 16/05/26-35 16/05/19-29 16/05/19-29 16/05/26-39 16/05/26-39

Total 067538 067541

O. BETTSCHEN 36874

Total 067532 067536

Page:

6/7/2016

35 HRS FLAGGING @ $39.50 33 HRS FLAGGING @ $39.50 35 HRS TRI-AXLE RENTAL @ $80 32 HRS TRI-AXLE RENTAL @ $80 36 HRS PATCHING @ $75 36 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75 33 HRS PATCHING @ $75 33 HRS FLAGGING @ $75

8793

SYDENHAM MOTORS HVAC PRESSURE SWITCH KIT

22268 22268 22251 22251 22348

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 19 HRS FLAGGING @ $39 6 HRS TRUCK @ $40 42 HRS FLAGGING @ $39 15 HRS TRUCK @ $40 32.5 HRS PATCH/FLAG @ $99.50

90550364

ARMTEC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CULVERTS

24194076 24194281 24194532 24194931 24194932 24194903 24194910 24194933 24194776

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS FUEL PETCOCK BRUSHCUTTER, KNIFE BLADES CONCRETE SAW RENTAL ROCK DRILL BIT, DRILL ROD CONCRETE SAW & ATTACHMENTS BULLDOZER RENTAL ROLLER RENTAL ORANGE PAINT TAMPER RENTAL

7907735

BLACK DOG TIRE & LUBRICANTS WHEEL BEARING GREASE

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005520 EFT000000005523 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005523 EFT000000005525 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005525 EFT000000005528 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005528 EFT000000005533 6/7/2016

$1,406.83 $1,326.44 $2,849.28 $2,605.06 $2,747.52 $723.51 $2,518.56 $663.22 $14,840.42 $701.55 $701.55 $754.04 $244.22 $1,666.83 $610.56 $3,290.65 $6,566.30 $7,092.45 $7,092.45 $60.21 $541.30 $120.27 $254.40 $1,806.24 $6,612.36 $3,949.31 $130.41 $933.14 $14,407.64 $36.12 $36.12

CINTAS 884710806 884732210 884730640 884732202 884732202

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS

$35.62 $68.37 $35.62 $190.84 $13.29

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 884732202 884733798 884733798 884733798 884735335 884735335 884735335 884732213

Total EFT000000005533 EFT000000005537 6/7/2016

COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COVERALLS COVERALLS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

COUNTY OF FRONTENAC IVC00000000046172 UPS-KEELEY RD NETWORK SWITCH IVC00000000046171 BARRACUDA BACKUP

Total EFT000000005537 EFT000000005538 6/7/2016 90060539 90060374 90060315 90060263 90061093 90060956 90060954 90061038 90060983 90060633 90061166 90061166 90060831

CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION 214.48T 3” @ $7.45 251.90T 3” @ $7.45 293.50T 3" @ $7.45 283.22T 3" @ $7.45 108.30T 3" @ $7.45 60.12T 3" @ $7.45 423.90T 3" @ $7.45 283.90T 3" @ $7.45 209.70T 3" @ $7.45 354.89T 3" @ $7.45 330.64T 3" @ $7.45 32.28T 5/8" @ $7.95 218.40T 3" @ $7.45

0919073

DALTCO ELECTRIC & SUPPLY 40 - 4’ FLUORESCENT LIGHTS

7237 7225

D.MARTIN WELDING & FABRICATING 1/4" PLATE ON TRAILER FABRICATE NEW PIN FOR KNUCKLE

Total EFT000000005538 EFT000000005540 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005540 EFT000000005542 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005542 EFT000000005544 6/7/2016

Page 69 of 136 $9.51 $116.51 $13.29 $9.51 $186.22 $13.29 $9.51 $71.42 $773.00 $175.16 $64.64 $239.80 $1,626.01 $1,909.71 $2,225.08 $2,147.14 $821.06 $455.78 $3,213.64 $2,152.32 $1,589.77 $2,690.46 $2,506.60 $261.15 $1,655.74 $23,254.46 $320.34 $320.34 $437.35 $106.08 $543.43

EVERTEMP INC 28823

Total EFT000000005544 EFT000000005547 6/7/2016

INSTALLED DIFFUSERS

$1,592.59 $1,592.59

FISH, DOROTHY 5921

Total EFT000000005547 EFT000000005551 6/7/2016

4 CLEANS @ $75

DEAL #22441

GANANOQUE CHEVROLET BUICK GMC 16-06 2016 CHEV SILVERADO 1/2T

37129

GIN-COR INDUSTRIES INC LIFT AXLE VALVES

15343

THE GREER GALLOWAY GROUP INC PERIOD ENDING 03/31/16

5866

G WILLIAMS PAVING LTD SYDENHAM CATCH BASIN REPAIRS

41265

INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE SERVICES TELEPHONE REPROGRAMMING

P21881 P21881 P22212 P22212

JOE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT INC. WIRE WIRE WIRING WIRING

847117829

KAL TIRE ONTARIO REPLACE RT REAR WHEEL SEAL

9304052738 9304050924

KENT AUTOMOTIVE GARAGE SUPPLIES GARAGE SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005551 EFT000000005552 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005552 EFT000000005553 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005553 EFT000000005554 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005554 EFT000000005556 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005556 EFT000000005558 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005558 EFT000000005559 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005559 EFT000000005560 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005560 EFT000000005563 6/7/2016

Page:

LEONARD FUELS

$300.00 $300.00 $33,215.48 $33,215.48 $571.47 $571.47 $2,823.84 $2,823.84 $2,747.52 $2,747.52 $145.01 $145.01 $309.17 $309.16 $1,281.44 $1,281.45 $3,181.22 $450.70 $450.70 $59.87 $43.28 $103.15

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 3935-699407

Total EFT000000005563 EFT000000005564 6/7/2016 16/05/27-45

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 4 CLEANS @ $75

DAR30008848

LIEBHERR CANADA LTD D&R BRUSH CUTTER LOW SPEED

54285787 54297036

LINDE CANADA LIMITED T4070 CYLINDER RENTAL WELDING SUPPLIES

31360

MCINTOSH PERRY CONSULTING MAR 26 - APR 29/16

Total EFT000000005564 EFT000000005565 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005565 EFT000000005567 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005567 EFT000000005572 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005572 EFT000000005573 6/7/2016

GRANBY 4500L DOUBLE WALL TANK

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 16/05/12-DESERT LK 77 HRS EXCAVATOR @ $130 16/05/12-DESERT LK 63 HRS HOE RAM @ $285 16/05/12-DESERT LK 78 HRS TRI-AXLE @ $85 16/05/16-DESERT LKRD 103.5 HRS HI-HOE @ $130 16/05/16-DESERT LKRD 31.5 HRS HOE RAM @ $285 16/05/16-DESERT LKRD 69 HRS TRI-AXLE @ $85

Total EFT000000005573 EFT000000005579 6/7/2016 11124 Total EFT000000005579 EFT000000005580 6/7/2016

PERFECT SOLUTIONS SAFETY SUPPLIES

Page:

Page 70 of 136 $966.72 $966.72 $300.00 $300.00 $594.34 $594.34 $23.00 $204.13 $227.13 $3,865.79 $3,865.79 $10,186.18 $18,271.01 $6,746.69 $13,691.81 $9,135.50 $5,968.22 $63,999.41 $481.78 $481.78

PETRIE FORD 210000

Total EFT000000005580 EFT000000005590 6/7/2016

ENGINE OIL

S-0044108 S-0044108 S-0044328 S-0044328

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 63.46T 5/8" @ $7.75 71.38T 3" @ $7.20 63.62T 5/8" @ $7.75 202.11T 3" @ $7.20

429140 324350T 428933

TALLMAN TRUCK CENTRE LIMITED OIL CHANGE/SERVICE COVER DIPSTICK TUBE, AIR BRAKE LEAK

Total EFT000000005590 EFT000000005591 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005591 EFT000000005592 6/7/2016

$49.09 $49.09 $500.47 $522.91 $501.74 $1,480.80 $3,005.92 $286.26 $257.57 $1,205.60 $1,749.43

TEM ROADWORK 282453-282453 282453-282453

Total EFT000000005592 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016 202307 Total EFT000000005595 EFT000000005596 6/7/2016

17.5 HRS @ $80 H/T PATCHING 17.5 HRS @ $20 FLAGGING TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE GAS CAN & BATTERY

$1,424.64 $356.16 $1,780.80 $28.47 $28.47

TRUE ELECTRIC 6707 6707 6707 6707

Total EFT000000005596 EFT000000005602 6/7/2016

REPAIR BROKEN LIGHT TROUBLESHOOT A/C UNIT RELOCATE STREET LIGHTS INSTALL NEW LED LIGHT

33774

VERONA HARDWARE LIMITED GARAGE SUPPLIES

0000123836

WHITE’S WEARPARTS LTD BUCKET EDGES

Total EFT000000005602 EFT000000005605 6/7/2016

$274.75 $91.58 $839.65 $137.38 $1,343.36 $46.48 $46.48

Total EFT000000005605

$1,160.07 $1,160.07

Total Cap/Equip/Ptrl

$206,079.43

3205 Mwg&Wd Spry Cheque EFT000000005525

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS TUNEUP/SERVICE TRIMMERS

Amount

Total EFT000000005525

$448.55 $448.55

Total Mwg&Wd Spry

$448.55

24194153

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

Page 71 of 136

3210 Brushing Cheque EFT000000005525

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 24194171

Vendor

Description

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS REPL STOLEN CHAINSAW

Total EFT000000005525

Total Brushing

Amount $1,059.32 $1,059.32

$1,059.32

3215 Drainage Cheque 067532

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Amount

O. BETTSCHEN 36879 36876

Total 067532 EFT000000005520

Description

6/7/2016

155.62T 5/8" @ $7.90 414.76T 3" @ $7.50

22255 22255

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 44 HRS FLAGGING @ $39 15 HRS TRUCK @ $40

90060374

CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION 49.20 5'8" @ $7.95

5845

G WILLIAMS PAVING LTD ROAD REPAIRS

S-0044190 S-0044190

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 162.58T 5/8" @ $7.75 86.83T 7/8" @ $8.65

79803

TOMLINSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CULVERT FLUSHING

Total EFT000000005520 EFT000000005538 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005538 EFT000000005554 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005554 EFT000000005590 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005590 EFT000000005593 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005593

Total Drainage

$1,251.05 $3,165.53 $4,416.58 $1,746.20 $610.56 $2,356.76 $398.02 $398.02 $8,598.72 $8,598.72 $1,282.17 $764.30 $2,046.47 $817.44 $817.44

$18,633.99

3310 Hardtop Patching Cheque 067532

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

6/7/2016

29.9T COLD PATCH @ $110

$3,346.89 $3,346.89

11 HRS PATCHING @ $75 7 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75 17.5 HRS @ $75 17.5 HRS @ $19.75

$839.52 $140.68 $1,335.61 $351.71 $2,667.52

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05/12-26 16/05/12-26 16/05/12-26 16/05/12-26

Total 067538 EFT000000005520

Amount

O. BETTSCHEN 36894

Total 067532 067538

Description

6/7/2016 22253 22250 22250 22301 22301 22348

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 21 HRS @ $80 8.5 HRS @ $80 31.5 HRS @ $80 21 HRS @ $80 3 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.50 9 HRS PATCH/FLAG @ $99.50

24194829

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS ASPHALT TAMPER, BROOM

4003

COMPTON PROPANE SOLUTIONS 2 X 100LB PROPANE

Total EFT000000005520 EFT000000005525 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005525 EFT000000005534 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005534 EFT000000005592 6/7/2016

$1,709.57 $691.97 $2,564.35 $1,709.57 $59.53 $911.26 $7,646.25 $258.15 $258.15 $162.10 $162.10

TEM ROADWORK 282453-282453 282453-282453 282453-282453 282453-282453

Total EFT000000005592 EFT000000005606 6/7/2016 2919 2919

19.5 HRS @ $80 H/T PATCHING 19.5 HRS @ $20 FLAGGING 24 HRS @ $80 H/T PATCHING 24 HRS @ $20 FLAGGING WILLIAMS HOT MIX LTD 12.35T SAND SEAL @ $97 44.36T SAND SEAL @ $97

$1,587.46 $396.86 $1,953.79 $488.45 $4,426.56 $1,219.02 $4,378.65

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT 2916 2916 2926 2926

11.83T SAND SEAL @ $97 18.44T SAND SEAL @ $97 8.69T SAND SEAL @ $97.00 17.91T SAND SEAL @ $97.00

Total EFT000000005606

Total Hardtop Patching

Page:

Page 72 of 136 $1,167.71 $1,820.16 $857.76 $1,767.86 $11,211.16

$29,718.63

3320 should maint Cheque EFT000000005590

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 12.52T 6" @ $7.80

Amount

Total EFT000000005590

$99.38 $99.38

Total should maint

$99.38

S-0044190

3415 dust layer Cheque EFT000000005575

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 16-391 16-353 16-413

Vendor

Description

MORRIS CHEMICALS INCORPORATED 19729.45L @ $.2094 20159.48L @ $.2094 10506.06L @ $.2251

Total EFT000000005575

Total dust layer

Amount $4,204.06 $4,295.70 $2,406.53 $10,906.29

$10,906.29

3425 Gradng & Grvl resurf Cheque 067532

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Amount

O. BETTSCHEN 36877 36856 36878 36855 36875

Total 067532 EFT000000005538

Description

6/7/2016

25.03T 5/8" @ $7.90 189.84T 5/8" @ $7.90 103.17T 5/8" @ $7.90 137.94T 5/8" @ $7.90 24.12T 5/8" @ $7.90

90061093 90060956 90060954 90061038 90060983 90060633 90061166

CRUICKSHANK CONSTRUCTION 88.10T 5/8" @ $7.95 24.78T 5/8" @ $7.95 86.39T 5/8" @ $7.95 100.41T 5.8" @ $7.95 12.08T 5/8" @ $7.95 86.30T 4/8" @ $7.95 75.50T 5/8" @ $7.95

S-0044108 S-0044108 S-0044108 S-0044108 S-0044190 S-0044190 S-0044190 S-0044328 S-0044328 S-0044328

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 23.41T 5/8" @ $7.75 713.82T 7/8" @ $7.65 11.80T SHOT ROCK @ $5.60 1011.71T 7/8" @ $8.75 575.10T 7/8" @ $7.65 17.83T 5/8" @ $8.75 667.54T 7/8" @ $8.65 297.16T 5/8" @ $7.75 137.60T 7/8" @ $7.65 310.10T 7/8" @ $8.65

Total EFT000000005538 EFT000000005590 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005590

Total Gradng & Grvl resurf

$201.22 $1,526.15 $829.40 $1,108.84 $193.90 $3,859.51 $712.73 $200.47 $698.89 $812.31 $97.73 $698.17 $610.78 $3,831.08 $184.62 $5,556.83 $67.24 $9,008.27 $4,476.94 $158.76 $5,875.87 $2,343.52 $1,071.17 $2,729.58 $31,472.80

$39,163.39

3601 Barricds & Sfty Matls Cheque EFT000000005525

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Description

24194172 24194543

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS STOP/SLOW PADDLES GLOVES

59291 59326

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE BRUSHES COOLER

Total EFT000000005525 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005595

Vendor

Amount $315.88 $118.45 $434.33 $31.01 $37.64 $68.65

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Barricds & Sfty Matls

Page:

Page 73 of 136 $502.98

3615 Street signs Cheque 067538

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05/19-32 16/05/19-32 16/05/25-38 16/05/25-38

21 HRS EXCAVATOR/AUGER @ $65 21 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75 8.5 HRS EXCAVATOR/AUGER @ $65 8.5 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.75

Total 067538

Total Street signs

$1,389.02 $422.05 $562.22 $170.83 $2,544.12

$2,544.12

3620 Reg signs Cheque EFT000000005555

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 INV106800109

Vendor

Description

HD SUPPLY CANADA, INC DEWALT IMPACT WRENCH

Total EFT000000005555

Total Reg signs

Amount $547.15 $547.15

$547.15

3630 Gd ps/rl mnt Cheque 067524 Total 067524 EFT000000005520

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

2791

MILLAR CEDAR POSTS LIMITED 400 PEELED CEDAR POSTS 8’X6"

22254 22254

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 31.5 HRS FLAGGING @ $19.50 13 HRS TRUCK @ $40

24194171 24194171

BATTLEFIELD EQUIPMENT RENTALS REPL STOLEN BRUSHCUTTERS REPLACE STOLEN TOOLS

201867

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE FENCE PLIERS

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005520 EFT000000005525 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005525 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016

Amount $4,782.72 $4,782.72 $625.06 $529.15 $1,154.21 $1,434.66 $421.84 $1,856.50

Total EFT000000005595

$19.81 $19.81

Total Gd ps/rl mnt

$7,813.24

3640 Warning Sgns Cheque EFT000000005529

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

351483

BMR MANUFACTURING INC. 100 - 5FT U-CHANNEL POSTS

201978

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE TAPE & 2 X 4 X 8 SPRUCE

Total EFT000000005529 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016

Amount $1,381.90 $1,381.90

Total EFT000000005595

$60.99 $60.99

Total Warning Sgns

$1,442.89

3800 Crssng Guards Cheque EFT000000005517

Date

Inv #

5/30/2016 16/05 16/05

Total EFT000000005517 EFT000000005518 5/30/2016

Total EFT000000005518

Total Trans 40 Env

Description

Amount $600.00 $17.28 $617.28

SNIDER, DEBBIE 16/05 16/05

Total Crssng Guards

Vendor

MACINTYRE, DOUG 20 DAYS @ $30.00 16/05 WSIB MACINTYRE CROSSING

20 DAYS @ $45.00 16/05 SNIDER WSIB

$900.00 $25.92 $925.92

$1,543.20 $319,164.59

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

Page 74 of 136

4110 Water Treat Cheque 067505 Total 067505 EFT000000005600

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

N6027631-1605

BELL CANADA-WATER TOWER PHONE LINE WATER TOWER CIRCUIT LINE

31571 31713

UTILITIES KINGSTON MARCH OPERATING COSTS APRIL OPERATING COSTS

6/7/2016

Amount $74.28 $74.28

Total EFT000000005600

$9,899.82 $9,899.82 $19,799.64

Total Water Treat

$19,873.92

5005 SW & Fac OH Cheque 067504

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

ATKINSON HOME BUILDING CENTRE HAMMER DRILL BIT

Amount

Total 067504

$6.41 $6.41

Total SW & Fac OH

$6.41

043469

5105 Garb coll Cheque 067501

Date

Inv #

5/30/2016

Vendor

Total 067528 EFT000000005514

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05 16/05

Total 067501 067528

Description

6/7/2016

16/05 COLLECTION 16/05 COLLECTION

005565

NEXGEN MUNICIPAL INC. JOYSTICK ASSY

16/05

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/05 COLLECTION

5/30/2016

Total EFT000000005514

Total Garb coll

$11,274.39 $9,306.49 $20,580.88 $320.60 $320.60 $11,517.09 $11,517.09

$32,418.57

5110 Gab disp Cheque 067538

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

5/30/2016

06366546

ABELL PEST CONTROL INC. JUNE PEST CONTROL

1453

CONTAINERS R US 2 - 20’LX8’WX8'6"H CONTAINERS

7142

JODY CAMPBELL’S SEPTIC SERVICE PORTABLE TOILET

Total EFT000000005521 EFT000000005535 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005535 EFT000000005557 6/7/2016

MCNICHOLS CONSTRUCTION LTD 16/05/13-SALEM 10 HRS @ $130 PACKING & FLOAT 16/05/13-GREEN BAY 8 HRS @ $130 PACKING & FLOAT 16/05/13-GREEN BAY 6 LOADS FILL

Total EFT000000005573 EFT000000005590 6/7/2016 S-0044328

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 12.36T 3" @ $7.20

59465

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE AIR HORN

Total EFT000000005590 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005595

3 LOADS GARBAGE 2 LOADS GARBAGE 4.5 HRS DOZER @ $80 8 HRS DOZER @ $80

WHALEY, GEORGE 16/05 DISPOSAL 16/05 DISPOSAL

Total EFT000000005519 EFT000000005521 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005557 EFT000000005573 6/7/2016

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05/24-34 16/05/16-27 16/05/20-37 16/05/09-22

Total 067538 EFT000000005519

Vendor

$534.24 $356.16 $366.34 $651.26 $1,908.00 $1,935.80 $1,935.80 $93.25 $93.25 $4,477.44 $4,477.44 $117.02 $117.02 $1,322.88 $1,058.30 $1,587.46 $3,968.64 $90.56 $90.56 $8.44 $8.44

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Gab disp

Page:

Page 75 of 136 $12,599.15

5205 Recyc Coll Cheque 067501

Total 067501 EFT000000005514

Date

Inv #

5/30/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05 16/05 16/05

16/05 COLLECTION 16/05 COLLECTION 16/05 COLLECTION

16/05

1622411 ONTARIO LTD. 16/05 COLLECTION

5/30/2016

Total EFT000000005514

Total Recyc Coll

$12,162.26 $10,605.36 $11,320.42 $34,088.04 $9,907.17 $9,907.17

$43,995.21

5210 Rec Disp/Prc Cheque 067538

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

SNIDER, PERCY 16/05/24-33

1 LOAD OCC - PORTLAND

Total 067538

Total Rec Disp/Prc

$178.08 $178.08

$178.08

5305 HHW Cheque EFT000000005530

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 20160058 20160058

Vendor

Description

BRENDAR ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 4 EVENT DAYS @ $400 MANIFESTS

Total EFT000000005530

Total HHW

Amount $1,628.16 $3,837.78 $5,465.94

$5,465.94

5315 Bale wrap Cheque EFT000000005603

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 C523

Vendor

Description

WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FEB, MARCH, APRIL BALER RENTAL

Total EFT000000005603

Total Bale wrap

Amount $457.92 $457.92

$457.92

Total Env

$114,995.20

70 Cem 7000 Health Cheque 067529

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Amount

NOONAN, MIKE 16/05/31-45

Total 067529 EFT000000005515

Description

5/30/2016 16/05

SALEM CEMETERY MOWING D G YOUNGE CONCRETE BURIAL VAULTS 16/05 SERVICES

Total EFT000000005515

$309.62 $309.62 $875.14 $875.14

Total Health

$1,184.76

Total Cem

$1,184.76

80 Rec 8000 Rec Cheque 067502 Total 067502 067509 Total 067509 067513

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

Amount

A-1 LOCKSMITHS 104431

LOCKBOX

$61.00 $61.00

FISHER, DAVE 16/05/30 - S REC

16/05/30 - S REC

$30.30 $30.30

GOWER, TERRA

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

Total 067513 067517 Total 067517 067519 Total 067519 067520

Total 067520 067521 Total 067521 067523

8:39:30 AM

6/7/2016

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total 067527 067529

$30.30 $30.30

HINCH, WILLIAM 58692-TROUSDALE

WHITE PAINT & TWINE

$36.62 $36.62

HOLLAND, TRACY 16/05/30 - L REC 16/05/30 - L REC

16/05/16-SF REC 10 KMS @ $.55 16/05/30 - L REC

$30.30 $4.96 $30.30 $65.56

IRWIN, NORM 16/05/30 - L REC

16/05/30 - L REC

$30.30 $30.30

MACADAM ASPHALT SEALING ASPHALT SEALING ASPHALT SEALING

MOREY, PAM 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC

6/7/2016

Total 067544 EFT000000005516

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005532 EFT000000005548 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005548 EFT000000005562 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005562 EFT000000005566 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005566 EFT000000005577 6/7/2016

$592.12 $592.12

HAULAGE/DISPOSAL

$354.73 $354.73

16/05

LEONARD, ELIZABETH 16/05 MAINTENANCE

2837

ASSELSTINE HARDWARE 3 LEAF RAKES

BELL, DAN 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC

16/05/16-SF REC 15 KMS @ $.55

BROWN, DONNA 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC 90 KMS @ $.55 CAMPBELL, ANNIE 16/05/30 - S REC 16/05/30 - S REC

$915.84 $122.11 $1,037.95 $142.50 $142.50 $33.55 $33.55 $30.30 $7.43 $37.73 $30.30 $44.58 $74.88 $30.30 $30.30

FOX, KEVIN 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/30 - S REC

16/05/16-SF REC 64 KMS @ $.55 16/05/30 - S REC

$30.30 $31.70 $30.30 $92.30

KOT, JOHN 16/04815-CTIRE/DEPOT 16/05/30 - S REC

KEY & CLOSET DOOR KNOB 16/05/30 - S REC

$22.36 $30.30 $52.66

LIMESTONE DISTRICT SCHOOL CONTRACT 6903 SF RIDES SKILLS PROGRAM PANTREY, AMANDA 16/05/30 - S REC SEC 16/05/30 - S REC SECRETARY

Total EFT000000005577 EFT000000005581 6/7/2016 77794 Total EFT000000005581

GLENDOWER BALL FIELD MOWING

UNITED RENTALS OF CANADA INC MODULAR FENCE MODULAR FENCE PANEL

Total EFT000000005516 EFT000000005524 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005531 EFT000000005532 6/7/2016

$30.30 $5.25 $35.55

134288524-004 133270344-006 5/30/2016

Total EFT000000005527 EFT000000005531 6/7/2016

16/05/16-SF REC 10.6 KMS @ $.55

SNIDER, PERCY

6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005524 EFT000000005527 6/7/2016

$2,111.52 $816.11 $2,927.63

NOONAN, MIKE

16/04/21-33 Total 067538 067544

$30.30 $30.30

HOWE, MIKE 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/30 - L REC

16/05/31-45 Total 067529 067538

Page 76 of 136

16/05/30 - L REC

6/7/2016

16/05/30 - L REC

20160004 2016005 Total 067523 067527

Page:

PRINTFUSION INC. 11000 @ $.03603 SURVEY SLIPS

$115.84 $115.84 $65.00 $65.00 $403.29 $403.29

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

EFT000000005587

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

6/7/2016

5 CLEANS @ $70 5 WKS BOOKING @ $10

SMITH, ROBERTA 16/05/30 - S REC 16/05/30 - S REC

Total EFT000000005588 EFT000000005589 6/7/2016 11104072

SUPERIOR PROPANE INC. 836.10L @ $.3960

201903 59317 59697 59838

TROUSDALE’S HOME HARDWARE 4 KEYS CABLE TIES DUCT TAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

Total EFT000000005589 EFT000000005595 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005595 EFT000000005596 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005596 EFT000000005598 6/7/2016 155420

Total EFT000000005601 EFT000000005604 6/7/2016 Total EFT000000005604 EFT000000005607 6/7/2016

Page 77 of 136 $350.00 $50.00 $400.00 $30.30 $30.30 $253.28 $253.28 $12.16 $7.09 $13.22 $99.80 $132.27

TRUE ELECTRIC 6707 6707

Total EFT000000005598 EFT000000005601 6/7/2016

SLEETH, SARAH 16/05/27-07 16/05/27-07

Total EFT000000005587 EFT000000005588 6/7/2016

Page:

1000 BALLASTBULB/GLASS/LENS RELOCATE LED LIGHT TYROUTE COMMUNICATIONS HOTSPOT - MUSEUM STUDENT

VANDEWAL, SARAH 16/05/16-SF REC SEC 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC SEC 7.8 KMS @ $.55 16/05/30 - REC SEC 16/05/30 - L REC SECRETARY

$1,129.96 $322.75 $1,452.71 $15.26 $15.26 $65.00 $3.87 $65.00 $133.87

WASH, PAUL 16/05/30 - L REC

16/05/30 - L REC

$30.30 $30.30

WOOD, ALVIN 16/05/16-SF REC 16/05/16-SF REC 06/05/30 - S REC

16/05/16-SF REC 44 KMS @ $.55 16/05/30 - S REC

$30.30 $21.80 $30.30 $82.40

Total EFT000000005607 EFT000000005609 6/7/2016 50736 50736 50736 50736 50736 50736 50736

XCG CONSULTANTS LTD. WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLING

Total EFT000000005609

Total Rec

$101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $101.76 $712.32

$9,523.12

8030 Cda Day Cheque 067546

Date 6/7/2016

Inv #

Vendor

Description

WEST WINDS RANCH E2016014 BALANCE BALANCE OF PONY RIDES

Total 067546

Total Cda Day

Amount $267.12 $267.12

$267.12

8036 Family Day Cheque EFT000000005576

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 16/04/14

Vendor

Description

FRONTENAC COMMUNITY ARENA FAMILY DAY SKATE

Total EFT000000005576

Total Family Day

Amount $500.00 $500.00

$500.00

8040 Trails Cheque EFT000000005590

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 S-0044108

Total EFT000000005590

Vendor

Description

SWEET’S SAND & GRAVEL 34.06T STONE DUST @ $10.75

Amount $372.58 $372.58

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Total Trails

Page:

Page 78 of 136 $372.58

8210 VCA Cheque 067508

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 2016009

Total 067508 EFT000000005569

6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

COLEMAN, DONALD MEETING REFRESHMENTS

MAGLIN SITE FURNITURE INC QUO-19976-W5X1 PARK BENCH

Total EFT000000005569

Total VCA

Amount $31.38 $31.38 $1,569.65 $1,569.65

$1,601.03

8220 VMC Cheque 067507 Total 067507 067508

Total 067508 067512

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016

Vendor

2016010

CASEMENT, JOYCE CATERING RETIREMENT DINNER

16/05/16 - VMC 16/04/18 - VMC

COLEMAN, DONALD 16/05/16 - VMC 16/04/18 - VMC

6/7/2016

6/7/2016 06/05/29

Total 067545 EFT000000005536

16/05/16 - VMC

$30.00 $30.00

16/05/16 - VMC

$30.00 $30.00

DECORATIONS-RETIREMENT DINNER

$84.32 $84.32

16/05/16 - VMC

$30.00 $30.00

LANSDELL, JIM 16/05/16 - VMC

Total 067522 067545

$30.00 $30.00 $60.00

HIND, DONNA 2016009

Total 067518 067522

$1,200.00 $1,200.00

HANSEN, KARL 16/05/16 - VMC

Total 067516 067518

Amount

FREELAND, BETH 16/05/16 - VMC

Total 067512 067516

Description

6/7/2016

VERONA LIONS CLUB HALL RENTAL-RETIREMENT DINNER

$295.00 $295.00

CONWAY, WAYNE 16/05/16 - VMC

$30.00 $30.00

16/05/16 - VMC

$30.00 $30.00

61014 - VHC 61053-VCA

THE FRONTENAC NEWS VMC ADVERTISING MEDICAL SEARCH ADVERTISING

16/05/16 - VMC Total EFT000000005536 EFT000000005541 6/7/2016

DAY, LOUISE

Total EFT000000005541 EFT000000005550 6/7/2016

Total EFT000000005550

Total VMC

$125.44 $60.52 $185.96

$1,975.28

8405 Ver&Dis Hist Cheque 067540

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 16/05/13 16/05/13 16/05/13 16/05/13 16/05/13 16/05/13

Total 067540

Total Ver&Dis Hist Total Rec 90 Plan

Vendor

Description

STEWART, BARBARA KEY CUT OPEN SIGN APPLE CIDER MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL TONER REFRIGERATOR

Amount $3.64 $172.98 $55.50 $55.00 $101.75 $234.05 $622.92

$622.92 $14,862.05

System:

6/3/2016

User ID:

srummell

8:39:30 AM

Township of South Frontenac CHEQUE DISTRIBUTION REPORT

Page:

Page 79 of 136

9000 Plan Cheque EFT000000005539

Date

Inv #

6/7/2016 138188 138189 138190 138191 138193 138194 138134

Total EFT000000005539 EFT000000005543 6/7/2016

Vendor

Description

CUNNINGHAM SWAN CARTY GEERAL ADVICE GENERAL ADVICE GEENRAL ADVICE GENERAL ADVICE GENERAL ADVICE GENERAL ADVICE DISBURSEMENTS JHONSTON POINT-OMB APPEAL

Amount $145.77 $101.76 $356.16 $966.72 $356.16 $42.19 $5,208.33 $7,177.09

ESRI CANADA 90081414

2016-05-01 - 2017-04-30

Total EFT000000005543

$2,025.02 $2,025.02

Total Plan

$9,202.11

Total Plan

$9,202.11

99 9999 Cheque 067547 Total 067547 EFT000000005576

Date 6/7/2016

Inv #

Description

HAMILTON, DEBRA 8-9-06901 REFUND 080 090 06901 REFUND

6/7/2016 16/04/14

Total EFT000000005576 EFT000000005583 6/7/2016

FRONTENAC COMMUNITY ARENA SPONSORSHIP OF PUBLIC SKATING

Amount $712.53 $712.53 $2,810.00 $2,810.00

REALTAX INC 56629

Total EFT000000005583

Vendor

PROCEED W REG’N

$491.55 $491.55

Total

$4,014.08

Total

$4,014.08

Total

$750,889.07

Page 80 of 136 PLANNING REPORT: Township of South Frontenac Prepared for Council Agenda Date: June 7, 2016

Planning Department County File No. 10T-2013/002

Date of Report: June 3, 2016 Subject: Peer Review Letter Regarding Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession VII, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac: 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant)

SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is that the Council receive the Planning Report dated June 2, 2016 and attachment for information relating to the plan of subdivision by 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant) in the Hamlet of Hartington. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this report is to bring to Council a peer review report regarding hydrogeological and terrain analysis components of the proposed Hartington Subdivision. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2016 Council received a report from the Planning Department containing a list of draft plan conditions for approval of the proposed thirteen lot Hartington subdivision. Council resolved that the matter be deferred and instructed the Township to engage an independent consulting firm to review the reports that have been submitted to date and make a determination on the water quality and quantity in the proposed development and surrounding areas and make recommendations as to any additional testing or monitoring that should be conducted. Accordingly, staff retained the firm of “exp. Services Inc.” to review all of the reports submitted relating to the proposed development. On May 31, 2016 Planning received the report. As stated in the document, its purpose was to determine whether or not the proponents have reasonably evaluated the groundwater source quantity and quality as well as sewage disposal conditions. DISCUSSION The report agrees with the recommendations of the Quinte Conservation Authority and Malroz Engineers that additional work is needed in the form of having each well evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist. They also recommend that groundwater quality should be further evaluated through sampling of each well for the standard subdivision parameters and augmented with some common agricultural pesticides and with a hydrocarbon scan to ensure there are no hydrocarbon impacts from the activities of the former fuel station. The report also suggests that agricultural land use should be restricted in proximity to the subdivision. A copy of the report is attached hereto for Council’s reference. Council should also note that a report entitled “Initial Independent Review of Hartington Development Proposal” dated May 10, 2016, initiated by the Hartington community is presently with the County of Frontenac being peerreviewed by Malroz Engineers.

Page 81 of 136 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council receive the Planning report dated June 3, 2016 with attachment for information regarding the plan of subdivision by 1278804 Ontario Inc. (Terry Grant) in the Hamlet of Hartington. . Submitted/Approved by: Lindsay Mills attachment HartingtonPeerReivewLetterToCouncilJune2016

Page 82 of 136

‘-“exo.

@0’

“: .‘o,<’: I:el)’: o: ‘€! )’>o’

May s, 2C)16

S Mr. Lindsay Mills (Planner/Deputy Clerk) Township of South Frontenac

p,,?IG:;80,U’ 9 L7 ’ T’.

Email: lmills(aisouthfrontenac.net

P.0. Box 100, Sydenham, Ontario i

Hartington, Ontario KOH 2TO

i I l

Dear Mr. Mills:

Re: KIN-0041529-AO

eXp F"eer Rev?ew Comments Regarding Hydrogeologic and Terrain Analysis Components of a Proposed Plan of Subdivision Application, Hamlet of Hartington, Township of South Frontenac l

Exp Services Inc. (exp) was retained by the Township of South Frontenac to review and provide comments regarding the hydrogeologic and terrain analysis components of a proposed privately serviced subdivision to be located on the southwest corner of Boyce and Petworth roads, its boundaries within the Hamlet of Hartington, Township of South Frontenac. The purpose of the peer review is to determine whether or not the proponents have reasonably evaluated the groundwater source quantity and quality as well as sewage disposal conditions. The Provincial Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) D-s-s and D-s-4 guidelines for private water supply and sewage disposal respectively form the starting point from which to evaluate privately serviced sites proposed for subdivision development. The following documents were received from you and reviewed by exp: Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment for the: Pmposed Hartington Development within Part of Lot 7, Concession 7 Geographic Township of Portland, Historical County of Frontenac, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac, Ontario, prepared by Archeowork Inc., September 16, 2013 *

Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analysis, prepared by ASC Environmental lnc, October 31, 2013

Hartington Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc, October 2013 Draft plan of proposed subdivision, prepared by Forefront Engineering Inc, March 2014 Draft Plan of PROPOSED SUBDIV?SION Patl of Lot 7. Concession Vll geographic Township of Portland now in the Township of South Frontenac County of Frontenac, prepared by Forefront Engineering lnc, March 2014 Hartington Development Traffic Impact Review, Ietter from Vanessa Skelton AECOM Canada Ltd, October 1 , 2014

Hartington Subdivision Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, prepared by Forefront Engineering lnc, November 2014

Sriile 3’l5 The Woolen Mill - 4 Cataraqcii Street, Kings(oii, ON K7K 127, Canada T: 1 .6’l3.542.l253 i F: 1.61 3.547.3767ovvww.ex?

Page 83 of 136

r’-?bi r }-‘vibis ( ‘ir inr+ I)l ) ?io,s iist ’ I - loo ?-it “rDl, ‘> wr iiat’icl ,>ri’ 4riq>rt i

" ?i?Ii()-g ??”?’ I(".g? a?l C/ “i-e?”’:31I’l =4 rll3i.”’)‘sIs C:on’l,oorhel’lt:‘i. riar’trrx=4torr, 76isrisliipi af Sai-rti’i r?oroi’:tariac, Orr(arici Kl’aj?‘4’r 529?rAr?i

IC:‘El’y’ s, 20"6

Peer Review (#3) of ASC Response for Application for Plan of Subdivision - Hartington, Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Township of South Frontenac, County of Frontenac , Ietter from Malroz Engineering Inc, April 9, 2015 Proposed Plan of Subdivision File IOT-2013/002 (Terry Grant Construction) Part of Lot 7, Concession 7 Geographic Township of Portland, Municipality of South Frontenac Applicant.’ 1278804 0ntario lnc, prepared by Mark Boone, P.Geo, June 2, 2015

Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision and 7?oning By-law Amendment Planning Brief Part of Lot 7, Concession 7, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac File Nos.: IOT-2013/002 and Z15/03, letter from Mike Keene Fotenn Consultant Inc., October 9, 2015

Hydrogeological Study and Terrain Analyses Response to Technical Comments from Mclntosh Perry Proposed 13 Lot Subdivision, Hamlet of Hartington, Ontario, Ietter by Paul N. Johnston ASC Environmental Inc, October 29, 2015

Review of Rebuttal Responses - Hartington Subdivision, Part Lot 7, Township of South Frontenac,

County of Frontenac (MP File No. CP-15-0397), Mclntosh & Perry, November 2015 *

Proposed 13 Lot Hartington Subdivision, Hartington, ON, Iettered by Paul N. Johnston ASC Environmental lnc, December 3, 2015

Nitrate Concentration at 13 Lot Boundary, prepared by ASC Environmental Inc., December 13, 2015

Soil and Groundwater Assessment letter- 5598 King’s Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario, prepared

by Cam Monk Specialized Onsite Services Inc., January 18, 2016 *

Soil and Groundwater Assessment letter- 5598 King’s Highway 38, Hartington, Ontario, prepared

by Cam Monk Specialized Onsite Services Inc, January 28, 2016 (updated) *

Hartington Gas Bar comments, prepared by John R Pyke Malroz Engineering Inc. forwarded by Frontenac County, February 19, 2016.

Draff Plan Conditions for Plan of Subdivision, Part of Lot 7, Concession Vll, Portland District, Township of South Frontenac: 1278804 0ntario Inc. (Terry Grant), prepared by Lindsay Mills, February 23, 2016 Groundwater elevations, prepared by Specialized Onsite Services Inc., September 28, 2016

The ASC Environmental Inc. Hydrogeological Study, Servicing Options and Terrain Analysis report

(ASC October 31, 2013) was prepared to support a proposed 49 lot subdivision on a 45 hectare property. The study was reportedly prepared to satisfy the provincial ministry of MOECC D-s-s and D5-4 guidelines respectively for private water supply and sewage disposal. We understand that following review by others and subsequent work the proponent has reduced the scope of the project from 49 lots on 45 hectare to 13 Iots on 11 hectares. The average size of the lots is reported to be a minimum of O.8 hectares.

Exp’s review of the documents provided by the Township suggests that there may be additional documents existing that have not been received or reviewed by us. Based on the documents received and reviewed by us we provide the following comments for your consideration:

.*l k-‘q

?.@ @: ’li

’eXp.

Page 84 of 136

exp Peer Review Commerits Proposed 13 Lot Privately Serviced Subdiiiision. Hydrogeology and Terrain Analysis Components, Hailington, Township of Sordh Frontenac, Oritario Klf’J-41529.-AO

Reference is given to the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) in the proponents planning report to justify the use of the existing Hamlet nucleus as an efficient and sound planning strategy per provincial recommendation. While this approach is recommended by the PPS there are situations in Ontario where such planning strategies may be detrimental to the planning process specifically in centres where the aquifer/s are found to be hydrogeologically sensitive to contamination and or are found to be lacking in water quantity. In our region of eastern Ontario a geologic feature known as the Frontenac Arch (a linear topographic bedrock high running northwest to southeast) underlies the region and is associated with thin soil cover and significant areas of exposed bedrock. For this reason the validity of the PPS with respect to directing development at existing centres needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis. Together the presence of shallow soils (0.35 to 1 .90 metres thick); Iimestone bedrock reported to be of the Gull River Fm. (a limestone highly susceptible to karst formation); reported significant degree of variability in groundwater hydraulic response; and the presence of existing nitrate contamination suggest that the aquifer may be sensitive to both water quantity (variability) and contamination from surface. The scope of work provided in the MOECC guidelines D-s-s and D-s-4 is not sufficient for sites that are or may be hydrogeologically sensitive. For this reason we concur with both the Quinte Conservation Authority and the County of Frontenac peer reviewer that additional work is required in the form of having each supply well evaluated by a qualified hydrogeologist. However, we further recommend to the Township that a detailed scope of testing requirements be established that is acceptable to the planning authority in advance of approval. The scope of testing should include further evaluation of groundwater quantity through individual well yield evaluation on all 13 wells and multi well interference testing (should include existing residential wells during interference testing) at subdivision demand with the 13 wells in place. Groundwater quality should be further evaluated through sampling of each well for the standard subdivision parameters and augmented with some common agricultural pesticides and with a hydrocarbon scan to ensure there are no hydrocarbon impacts from the fuel station activities. *

May s, 2016

Given the potential hydrogeologic sensitivity associated with the site/Hamlet the Township should consider restricting agricultural Iand use in close proximity to the site/Hamlet. A set-back should be established in order to protect the drinking water source from agricultural contaminants such as nitrate, pathogens, fertilizers, and pesticides.

j l

We trust that these comments will satisfy your needs at this time; however, if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Closing

exp Services Inc.

hLO%

? Aoo b ?’

‘;[”? /4u

#’ ?’?

Yours very truly,

l l

ch=i-p’h-ce-is Hydrogeologist, Branch Manager

f..oW., ‘@ }-@

’eX

‘@ l

Page 85 of 136

STAFF REPORT CLERKS DEPARTMENT

Prepared for Council:

May 31, 2016

Agenda Date:

June 7, 2016

SUBJECT: Summer Council Meeting Schedule & OEMC Conference RECOMMENDATION: For information only. MEETING SCHEDULE: The following dates are scheduled for July and August: (all at 7:00 pm) • Council Meeting – July 5, 2016 – Council Chambers • Town Hall Meeting – Bedford District – July 12, 2016 - Bedford Hall • Town Hall Meeting – Loughborough District – July 18, 2016- Council Chambers • Town Hall Meeting – Portland District – July 19, 2016 – S & A Hall • Town Hall Meeting – Storrington District - July 21, 2016 - Storrington Centre • Council Meeting - August 2, 2016 – Council Chambers • Lake Association Meeting - August 25, 2016 – Council Chambers The regular schedule for Council and Committee of the Whole meetings will resume in September. ONTARIO EAST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE: The Ontario East Municipal Conference is scheduled for September 14-16, 2016 at the Ambassador Hotel and Conference Centre in Kingston. Please contact the Clerk’s Department if you wish to be registered for this conference. Visit http://www.oemc.ca/ for more information.

Submitted/approved by: Angela Maddocks Executive Assistant

Page 86 of 136 Angela Maddocks From: Sent: To: Subject:

Peter Counihan petercounihan@counihan.com May-19-16 11:55 PM Angela Maddocks S.10.2 and S5.11

I sympathize with the concern about preserving the environment. However, I think there should be a balance between the rights of the property owners and broader environmental concerns. It seems that SouthFrontenac has one of the strictest CZBL regarding shoreline development. I have also personally experienced a potentially overreaching interpretation of the CZBL. South Frontenac should not take away the legal rights of grandfathered property owners; at least not without appropriate compensation. I feel strongly about this because of the significant expense that I have incurred to maintain my property and the environment. If a building is derelict and has not been used or maintained, it is possible that such a building could lose its grandfathered rights after a reasonable period of time. Properties that are rebuilt should comply with best practices as much as is possible. I think a practical solution can be reached.

-Peter Counihan 4406 Atkins Lane

Page 87 of 136 Angela Maddocks From: Sent: To: Subject:

Sharlene Coates sharlenecoates@gmail.com May-19-16 5:49 PM Angela Maddocks South Frontenac amendment to waterfront bylaws

I am amongst those strongly opposed to the bylaw amendment being proposed for property owners here in South Frontenac. Not only will it devalue our homes but will make it difficult for future sales opportunities. If we can not do necessary upgrades and repairs to our current properties without having to jump through the hoops being proposed then there will be an increase in derelict properties which is the reasoning for these changes according to the planner. I strongly urge our council to strike down this destructive amendment and instead deal with the individual offenders of poorly kept properties. As to protecting our lakes and water shed I believe those of us owning water front property are more inclined to protect the shoreline rather than destroy it….A healthy lake and shoreline increases the value of our asset. John Coates Dog Lake

Page 88 of 136 Angela Maddocks From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Steven Sadura sadura@uoguelph.ca May-19-16 3:35 PM Angela Maddocks Anna; Alan Perry comment on proposals before council to amend the comprehensive zoning bylaw, sections 5.10.2 and 5.11

I have a concern over the proposed amendment 5.11 As part owner of a seasonal summer cottage on Dog Lake, the wording of the following phrase has me concerned. “A building or structure, including a legal non-conforming and/or legal non-complying building or structure, may be replaced with a new building or structure in the case of partial or complete destruction caused by fire, lightning, explosion, tempest, flood or act of God, or demolition permit issued by the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac or other authority for safety, health or sanitation requirements, providing such building or structure is serviced by a potable water supply and sewage disposal system approved by the appropriate responsible authority.” Our cottage water comes directly from the lake and is NOT potable. Does this proposed amendment mean that the cottage could not be rebuilt if it was destroyed. I would appreciate some clarification. Thanks.

-Steven Sadura Instructor/Research Technician School of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Room 221 Alexander Hall (519) 824-4120 Ext. 53393

Page 89 of 136

South Frontenac - Proposed By-Law Changes

PETIT ON FROM RESIDENTS, TAX-PAYERS & VOTERS OF SOUTH FRONTEN Tne purposd of thu pet)+jon i3 tJ ^r.sure that cny proposed amendments to Comprehensive Zoning By-fav.s recgive con.-‘idsrab!0 puolic conjultatir’n. with pi’oposed changes afivartised onlina snc< in ;ocn’ pspcr and in each instanco rdsidents have an opportunr.v to ‘/oi.-’e their concerns end have those concerns addressfcd before changes are voted upon ay council.

Tlie undersigned demand that any amendments bo sections s5.11 and s.5.10.2 of the South

Frontenac Township Zoning By-laws law (CZBL) be delayed for three months, to allow Staff, Council and Residents alike the opportunity to investigate the full impact of proposed changes on existing structures (whether or not they are legal non-complying structures). Also the impact on the rights of the residents to enjoy their homes and cottages and to protect the values of their properties. Address

^arne

W’J) fi^K^U^ <x^e^ ?/ ck^ // N..m; <J^-.

Name

Ttfh. C.^

^WSf/i^£

Contaci

w ^?^.0

Address

4^20 32<?J ^ ^ p ^ ^ ^ 3 n0.or<^

^ ^^^

Contact

L-( 3^c\ ^^Srt/(-C(J A^

d f^c

<^.

/»^

^_3S-J..^^^

^t? .».

N&me

C t^^, ^/j’ -(jy^? ^ C, Fh ^( , C^.-^

Contact

U^a buLt^ (3j>tW -C^w’^ .^w

p^WtL h-v^u A/[^

r^ss3 ^sn

^y 15 ^""^O^^^

^ultffc)b-rl<J^ ^^?^‘c

A ^^r^l^s^ fy^

Address

<^t.jk( HA^y

oL^<^^(0’^^.iJe^

address

Contact

6, .‘3-?. -S-y,^

^2^fcu c<n//^/K/t/ ^ o-p-K^ -?V^/ L?^J Address

CwoL ^ ^^A^t-//^0 . t .-s ,vjume

^ ei,^! vJ/A/^A^ f

Name

7/^3 ^r^^^^^a

-7^2 ^ ^^^i^jfsy^y. ff^~ if

^Yo

Address

^^ Jt^£/ A^^T

^Z. ^ /Wfc ^

^Qv^/i^a^

;^cilT!e.

‘% /% ‘ftws /^/c/y

Naifti’s

2 n^ M *<.

£^

^/r^ .^>^^^

Address

Lf<

^i3 ‘5HU’ 3^‘V ;< tf’f / fC ^ Csp^rls. s^ 6 M luTUI naiL-

Contact

Name

f^ r- :–;.; ‘3*1’

Address

Name

,$y^3^y-/ft^ ^ ^ j3?-6.)

^^0 ? ^ fi^^^^J

T^fl^l^i J^^Cs^

^V-Z-76’’~?<Hl

Nprne

co.mscf

\oBo CS^£.L.{^ ^.^

N am tt

^KeM^@^U^1

/.’

L-oruact

(&<3)-?-^^^

/*^t^^UZ^^ <^.^//. ^^t

r^^ 0- m.r^ »

Addffc-SS

:?n’;^::t

Sg/^-^^

Contac

z A)37(^^p^<

Ja/MjecarrO.^ ^-^^^3^^ ‘G^ uact^^^^y^ ^7 ^..

Address

2122-/^nDi.y Iff. M^r/^ Address

^i^H (6> j^/7/>^//<^. 6? Uonmct

(2^ s»r<y -^^ y ^..^ »

m^ 4^

^fc -s ^ ^z^ ^Q^yfv^. ^ t

£.& <:

..-. ',A ^

? ^

.<-

^v^s i^p

Page 90 of 136

South Frontenac - Proposed By-Law Changes

PETITION FROM RESIDENTS, TAX-PAYERS & VOTERS OF SOUTH FRONTE Fhe purpose ofti’i.; petition is tc sn.‘ura that any proposed amendments 10 Con".prenensive Zoning By-laws rec.eivo conyiderable public consultation; with p;oposed chsnges aJ*/ertisec> online and in ;oc?f pcner and in each instance residents have an onpoia’nity to voice the;r cnnc^mo csnd have those concerns addressed before chanqes are voted upcn by councii.

The undersigned demand that any amendments to sections s5.11 and s.5.10.2 of the South Frontenac Township Zoning By-laws law (CZBL) be delayed for three months, to allow Staff, Council and Residents alike the opportunity to investigate tiie full impact: of proposed changes on existing

structures (whether or not they are legal non-complying structures). Also the impact on the rights of the residents to enjoy their homes and cottages and to protect the values of their properties. Nan’; e

<1 .r

t-‘ffi

Address

mi V_4 37%^j^^^t^t^^ ^^

Add res

-ns w

r »C-^<Name

j^/^/e^^ s^sr y T^ff /^^yi-rm ^r-^

Adcir<5c;§

jn y

tytffy^-

Nsrn^

A-ldrs^

/i,/vi»^r

“^^

Address

7%A»^ A^e

f^^TSf^

^Q\ee^ff<^^’ r^

~~^^o,k^^iH~~e.

^fc^ ^/^y.^

Contact

(S’^^T^^^”’

^ ywyer.t.ff^\

Conty^

C^a-y^’’"’» Fft^ ^e^^‘c^.

(?Sy^>

Contact

riadh?ch/^?,W-ff^^/^ t

^ r c<n(

Contac; c^t-^ n/^c^*sou^yv7

Ayr"

^/ Qisr^^ft^ -

Name

Address

W\cV 5^A,(//^

11^

^me

ContactT

Add ;-^

S^JLa^Lt^^

C-,

(UP ^U^

/^^/^^/Sc^Lt^<^^.7

Co n-ttact

r/ A^r^ ^-ft ?/<&<s"

-/^A/’/

\^ ^A. L^

i ._ .,

Name

Nan’iS

CM<^>^-y ^ l(;^s’s

Marne

{s.

^W( ^^‘e ^^ <

-/O.U .^gjLL^i ft (?^ ^ ^(Z^flcf -^ C^ f

6A^

^rjjt^A^y ^

Nan ie

Contac’.

^^«n^5®^7>s-<verl ^£f^^tct C0f
Contact

^f^‘l»^yl

% 9^efep ^^’

yy|.U<>Y/<M^<2-j »J.

^-h^i^-^-

Addless /5^^L^

Contact

^’- 6M&"^S 1- ‘^ ^^c/^^^5~^

Nan’c

J^/f^ ^^^^/

w^/^ ^/^^ ^^

/.l’-’’

contaci

<^^/W ftl/^M ^f^f4f

^/!‘3ff’^^^y

A.Jd’QS?

Contact

^ 6^^U-A L*^ ?^ \Y Gcx^ L^J4 IP>SA^*^Q>, ^^^{^.^^ 7 ^K ITt)

ajJL ^

^3,^5 -/<//</

f/e^ff^oL. Qi^/ . ^

4,^^

Contaci

Mi^e

^ dcr /^^rl-^e/(

<Sf^

contact

t^s

c^ t

Page 91 of 136

South Frontenac - Proposed By-Law Changes

PETITION FROM RESIDENTS, TAX-PAYERS & VOTERS OF SOUTH FRONTEN Thj pLjmc?e of th;s petiiijn IE to ensure that any nrcposed e.mendments to Comprehensi’.-.; Zoning By-‘aws .-“Cfcive

considcrnble nubSic Ctns-jjtatron, with p.-oposed chcnges advri^ised onl’ne and in iocal paper and in each instancp resid&nt; have an opportunitv to voice their conce.-ns c:nd have those concem-^ 3duressed beforb chk-nges sre voted upon hv coun^i

The undersigned demand that any amendments to sections s5.11 and s.5.10.2 of the South

Frontenac Township Zoning By-laws law (CZBL) be delayed for three months, to allow Staff, Council and Residents alike the opportunity to investigate the full impact of proposed changes on existing structures (whether or not they are legal non-complying structures). Also tJ-ie impact on the nghts of the residents to enjoy their homes and cottages and to protect the values of their properties. Namf

A^fdr^s?

Cc’ntact

.t y

^U/^/uiwl^ ^4^<sL 3Q-7^

^,7^ ^y^^./n^^ J^

? .”.

l^<5lTi£

-iddi^SS

^

f

n

^b^^ ^^f^-c^^r^f^ ‘3 / ^/,^c^w ddresss

/

fk^ i. ii’n&

l^(

.-?

iiic^i

f .4

.ffy^. i

ywyy’^ ry

M

^^^^e^ /Qf^A^£^& f^3/ t^£^r^/6^^^ & ,3-88 8-/^7^

?*tfi^’>£i

COi’Hc.. Ji -.-

JaJm ^? o^

^375 cJ<=:ST^i^ LR<L

f^J.

6/3 ^s ‘^o TO

^

it f

N&,-ie

Address

^y^ui ^

Addt^’-^c ;.’?£,%

^

Addfess

CGI’it;’"."!.

AriJi iwss<;

Contdct

CSQc^.

M.

^ t,

r».

^k

;/n’.e -*

^Af^Jl Na-, i ‘y

^l3. 5^?-^’/Z) Coniwt

^f^^$^-33^d

44Q I U^^r^rc^ ^ 6^ ~3 S3 <y3^Q

‘;-3

-^

<->Oilt£iCi

yw/ uj^cne^

^01 ^}^ie^i^

7

.^

^ -y^Ly<

^WM^‘L^ 3^ 1o^ ^3^ J^^;<^ L^ (p/3'5r5~7G3^

Adclre^s

Ccmacc

Address

Contact

.^

^“f^^yv\/^

(v

a^yniUv^c’ –H’

.‘’tcft’iiC

Address

Nam^

Contact I-

Co,itec;

t

J-

t

.’.I

^

.f

f

(&A^S ..-h. ^

^ a me

Oiz>- S31- ?^1(c

L^3 iucsk^^ Lci tCA-C k/5 –rs^-7/n-

.^a/Lft. L C^c L//I ,Y A*^

-^.

W Ue^e^ ^

d

J^Qt^ ^S^LW

^S@5 kWfe^fe ^fW'7^ W-^7 , ter ji’^/^/L Address

Cuntad

Adores?

uni’iiact

^f5 ]^ s41//&^ /^A/£-

^ ^ 1 W^

.\

/-” ‘Od ^

D

»

f

U> £.’

^..

<

..

^’^ .&- :KI ^

^ ^-p-

^ r> ^

^

0 c?

^

r^

r\

^^

*>.

(^

s; *l “v,

:$3

gt!

^

^.^

^

c

TT ‘S

^

0

d £

a9 T-s ^=7 p

\

yi^

i

(^

/

^

.<

‘~^i

r

*^h ‘I

^

<r.

is.

^

z

<^

-s

^

¥-

<

1

^

r-

9^ ?.”- t~s c-

‘^ ^^

J\

^^

‘»

s iR

It

tf

^‘i t^\J

^

<

F> h-3

^

w ^

-

^ ^

?L

?0 t\

^ ^

f%

^

^

^_,

^ *

^

f

^ ^

h-;

^s 0^

-^ -L

-^ C^t ‘ZJ

y\

^

r–

FO

u^ p-

^

,^ fl

^

‘I

“’

c ^-

^1 f

^ ^

^ ^

^ ^ w ^

f

«-f

^

03 ^

r<

0

f

^ ^ ts^

1~ 0

0<1

,Lu

^ ^

<”

-i

(^3

^

s~" 4^ t-

^ ^ cP t-Q

u

^ ^

0 0 ^ f

<^0

i

</^ h

.^

“sJ

N> I.

-4

!G^

^

h-.’

r^ r-

(^ c

^

K). ^

\J

T

0^ <
^

^ ^

VI

HB^ ?”

S-Srt"

i?e Ti w ^t.

?

&

^

^

.w

?h ^

n

^

<^

‘T-

^

r-

ts’ ^

1^

0^

00 f-^ -^

^slL <^

T’»<’

1^

^

^

^

yi »

&

^g J

v9

yi n

E^i <

^

^ ??*

^

i ?3 f, M

^^

s c*

^3

T? ^

d

<f.

Q

ys

*.

ti ^ x, ^ 1

^

(0 -L

T 2 -T <. ri

^

-1

‘J

.<. ^

^

-I

.

f-

IS u f^

mu .1> LL dJ

~D

<

0 < ^ f^ r
FTt 3- “?T -^

^p

?0 ^ n ^ 0) -; f. : .is 0 .‘c ffo ^ ^’ »
Cl. -3 < J’

c

a;350 w S) ‘-.d w m0 0 d.^ rr

^

^-

^^:T ^ 0) ^ 0 Q a-a^ 0 i~) ? Q -^ _> Tt m -3 ‘-: 0) ^ 0 1^ ^/ ~\

^

1

Ill

wS

!^

f* r .-» ..+^1 ^ -1^

“^

s”

-t

63 ^

“t-

-d rl

a»

s ?li I y

s^ <

L. ..’

-! ~z. $^ <^-1

^

^^

^

J”-”

-JLt

^

w rr> G /.

h^, hA

r;

‘//

..- ^

1ST

^

R

m

^

^. ^

73

-i 01 -+ ’t. =r£ 0 -a ^

3- ,.:

‘<

0 s

&ffg B

s

-n

3 ^

/t-,

^

(T -£

<t’

^

^ 0 Tt

ST ^.Ri oj v Vf.f K <

.»

s

^

t

^

f\

.-,.

^

z

/.

^ “.*’

s

^ ^.

r c

MJ

-^

0 HI ^3

^io)^

f-

^- % c

.*

r

S3

,

^-

\p

..^.

00 ^v -0 oo

^

t

Q f-t’~\

B-

-I

p

^

n>

0

!’.

1 fl

^ ~’

/>

^

3-

.R3

^ t.

f .1

K

/., j

:^

D

v

-*.

-I

^ ft? ^‘1^s

L-

1^)

0 “^ ‘0 0 <t ^T’ < ^ js a a ^. c r-r

0 ;=. ,3 ft

g

^£ J

c~

^-

FS1^ z

k

^ r

^ ^

‘V

^

3

^

t.‘A <’

“= r <-"< -3 S. ;3

Q

^ “t k

.^^

m

^

-,.<

f

^

f

^

ii/ L^

^

c iB Q

’ 5 -1

./

/^ ^*

_\

^

1 .’ ^.

I.

u =: /r, f ro ^ .‘y JD rL< Q f E? .^ L~ V

-*.

^ “^

.J

0 (.

a r” ^~ .). In .~) n:a c: 3 ^ Q 11

I -n

?0

0

z -1 m z

0

Page 92 of 136

L

r

c^

?
^1

^ -0

(^

iy ^

s

&

-^

v

IV A^ ^

“^ .a

0

<A}

t-^

^

-T

1,

(
^

s-

r ?-^

^

a G ^)

‘«»

s

^-

f

0

0

^

w

r

^

-J

\J

^

^

s

Jr ^. -J-j IA?

J \

y,

0

-(”

-p

f

’ ^’

‘y f

L

r_ f^S.

^

^

^ ^

t

a

?

I-

1

3-<

“.S»

t

-&-

Pi

«*>

“0 l/t

1

^i! A ai “^ I_> LdL I.: 3 ‘:k .~
-. ft ta -r-i ‘^ .^ .J7 /.J .\u’ ‘^ ‘.t

I

e

f.

rf^

^

51

.s ^ ^

^

,1

(^’

»

c

31 &

r^

r ^^

^

^ ^

f

^

J

r::’

-+\ r I

^

^ ^

c^,

if^

G?

^

‘<->

^

^

rP^ “s

fe^ ^ ^>

y^

L.

^

^

Tr

=^ ^

^

Page 93 of 136

South Frontenac - Proposed By-Law Changes

PET I T I 0 N FROM RESIDENTS, TAX-PAYERS & VOTERS OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

J^ purpose ortnis petmon is to ensure that any proposed am..ndm:,nts to Comprehensive Zcni,,p By-law’s re

considerable pubtic consultation^ wilh propose changes ?dvert<sed online rnu in local paper sndTn

rsce:ve

y

ch instance residents

^^> ^c;

have an opportunity to voice their concerns and have those cone ^ns addressed oefoiuchanaes are voted upon by counGll. The undersigned demand that any amendments to sections s5.11 and s.5.10.2 of the South

Frw1tena?-Towns,h’p?-n’ngBy-.lawsbw(l::2.BL).be ddayed for.y1ree months’ to a"ow Staff; Coundl andResidents^like the opportunity to investigate the Mi impact of proposed’changeson’exisUng *uctures_ (whether or^ not Uiey are legal non-complying structures); Also Uie impact on the nghts of

the residents to enjoy their homes and cottages and to protect the values of their propertifs. sf.ie

Cwvl AllmMdi^jer

Address

Contact

W^i^B^ci I Jnwi ^ in^c^/iw

iM ante

Address

^l-P Li^o-^uJ

3133 ^AKfT^eflO^

Nyn ie

Audress

rnr/^ r^na^

v

n^^^^i//?.

Contzct

ftl^ 1~^M^C^44^’ / <y^ Contact

^

Narna

f^are.ip

COiiLSCt

i^jafl^i;

Address

Contac

Nan’ir-

Address

Contact

Naiiifc-

AdCliSS&

L>0i"ilft0i

Npr’ne

Acidi’ess

Contact

^ame

Aduress

t^ontsCi

i^;

Acicii’ess

\J onttfCi

‘iSii’tP

Aridres?

Contact

name

Address:

<;0,lt.-:Ct

^

“ifT,^

Add res?

Contact

i^nit

Artdi’es?

ie3

COf^

-nntact

<J

^

**

£ fi

^-

1

.-T

^

./

?_.

1

^

“6>

.-

C3

^

f^3*

^-~

?

?

^

r^

3

^.

\

<^

r

<

fr,

Qr

L-

T

c V

c ^ f

t-

(.

Nt

.^

v^

V’

0

^ 1

^

i.

u

^”

/..; If

f

0

y

tfr

0

rf*

?

^

c,.

“»..

^AJ c,

f

c.:

0

^

-c:

Q.-

^

^

<c r^ ^~.

-^ .^

^-

<’

s

^y

p-

g

^

c ^

L_

.._L. / f .^

I”! r

.&

A

J f (

ist <

c t.

/ s. ^- J.

r

/-

f

^

< ft

(^

|h

00 l>, -^

^ ^

*-^

^J

c v< ^

^ -0

^ 7

‘^

^ ^ V,

^

^

QAJ’ c/v

^

-^ [ift f

^ \M

^ ^ 0-

^ ^s> -^A

<D

w B

^

h^

0 B

^e N)

s)

i1

^ ^ SSK.

^ ^ ^

^ ©

ig

Sl ft

^

,^ .t

p.^

a s9 ?*’

^

.“a

-< I

a» *^.Vfc .U *

^.1 0 ‘J ^ .»-^ ..) ^-t 0If) Q. :3 r -? .W’ ^ t!1

So ^ < 0 -I

^

7f 3”

‘.n -. -..^

T^ ^ a L~* Tl ..> 0 - 0 CT

^

61 y*

a

^mn 3

Hh*

^

<^

^y

c^’

t

^!

f-

:: m

./
k-^.

^ -t- ^.

^ ^s

CT

1’

“a

0 tiv^ .10

0

^

fJuT

ft ^

L-

^

5 “D ~z. nm^ -I co a

,-J

t

Y3

.«^ ‘^. *

tf/

(p p. Q < 0 1

^‘1 ^ yi

r^ ‘-<

f”

S’e

t/

-^f"1i .. ~i

^

1

w

^

wwt

w F-T-. TVW’ -_ !a. Q ^ .^; -;. r~> -i ^ (U .^’ ^-J .” ^ ^ .I-/ t’L ^ ^. p ^ tt

_> »J ^ ‘ft p w

.^

s^

s –

-}.fl -r~> ^

^

f.

m^t

C/) 0

a; c. “"^ rt

s

<

ra -3 <;’ fi ‘”? n

^ ‘.’-/ ^ .s

-n

^

v CO

-^ ^d-

^

L;

r-

~^

‘.;

w4-

0

c:

‘i

£^ S ~> I 1-; .i> u (T. -n

(.*

-.< .f .^

\

? ^1^ .^

l> ^ d /*”

^ il: ^ r

r b 0 3 0 J 3 (:r” ?”
i. u ^

0 a. 1.;

3 -?-^ ;/-

i~>

.» i

0

2 ~i m z

0

Page 94 of 136

LX

?,

to

^

0

03

<^

^\

3’&

i:F^-f(.!G-~ c.

^

s-

0n c. t

s

“S;*

73

~.’

.I.

^

^

‘£S

^

^

^J

^

-1 u

I

.%, ;

~0

f

^~ ^s0 -

^

n

“’?’

^

3f

tl

E

r-T

&>

^

<^

OJ

-F’

rt.

%iH

P–

^^~-

Sf^

J?

^*

n ^

-£: ^

^=

^

.HI0s

@ “3 ^ ?-

F

^o:n ‘3 zfi

s -f

5S-

r^ns-^^ A ^ :3 J -^ ^

..*.

^ .’

/’ /. .

.N” ‘~~^

^ ^

q^

3-

-1

w 0 "” 0 f"l T- -n J i^. < ~1

QE.~^

/

m -i

^

‘">

F . . *^

i

A*

.

»

:1’^

c t-’ F T -/

^

y

“)

^’

.^ 0 M ^

§

f»_

n

^ *

.f

“0 ^

.^t ^

«” 13 ».^1 + T? r “I (’

^ ‘ir Q

*.

g’gV ftl

^

-^

n 7S

.*->

E

:§1

B

.<h»>

<

^ I

s”,

J_

!L_

.3- r’ U 0 Lf ^ :.. Ct> ft. en K’v 1: c. ^t~

n?

^^

<t

r~

m^y^-

$:

r

^

c&

(^ .*

t

Slij1

d*

Jn

?’

£h

*. -ll

^ ^

D

(^

h-t

r&

rp

EF

^-

Page 95 of 136

Lindsay Mills From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Wayne Orr May-04-16 3:41 PM Pamela Jones; Lindsay Mills Angela Maddocks RE: Addendum to my Comment on proposed amendments to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law

Hello

Thank you for the update.

We will include this with the comments you have already submitted as part of the agenda. Wayne Orr Chief Administrative Officer

Township of South Frontenac Box 100, Sydenham ON KOH 2TO 613-376-3027 Ext 2225

613-376-6657 (Fax) From: Pamela Jones [mailto:maddogbtw@gmail.com] Sent: May-04-16 1:29 PM

To: Lindsay Mills lmills@southfrontenac.net; Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net Cc: Angela Maddocks amaddocks@southfrontenac.net Subject: Addendum to my Comment on proposedamendmentstosections5.10.2and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law

Hello Lindsay and Wayne,

Since sending the forwarded message below (dated 21 Apr 2016), which Wayne advised would be appended to the Agenda for the 10 May meeting, I have reviewed the Agenda for the 26 April meeting, notably the proposal to retain (and not remove) section 5.11 (perhaps to be revised?), the legal opinion and some of the many submissions from other property owners. I have also received feedback from a number of the Councillors.

In view of these, I would like to offer an addendum (below) to my comments that I hope is in time to be included with my original comments for the 10 May meeting. I had hoped to be able to attend the 10 May meeting to listen to the discussion, but regret that it does not look possible at this point. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss, please contact me. Regards, Pamela Jones

teL: (613)237-6902 Addendum to My Comments of21Apr2016:

Page 96 of 136 Tl 1

o the members of Council of the Township of South Frontenac:

Since making my initial comments I have had the opportunity to review the updated Planning Report (dated 19 April and posted 22 April for the 26 April meeting), the letter from the Township’s solicitor (that included helpful reference material on municipal law), and some of the many submissions from other property owners. I have also received feedback from a number of the Councillors.

I understand the comments support retention of much of the current wording of section 5.11 as protection of the right to rebuild a non-conforming structure in the event it is destroyed; I also understand the concern regarding the delay that might result should all non-conforming building proposals be required to go through the minor variance application process: I agree it should be clear (and easy) that when a building is destroyed, a property owner is allowed to rebuild on the same footprint with the same building (per my original comment D(c) on the intent); however, based on the above understanding, I would amend my comment (in E(d)) so that the minor variance process would not need to be followed where the circumstances indicate that an act of God has

necessitated repairs, provided that the owner wishes to rebuild the same building on the same footprint. I understand that the minor variance process may still be used where a property owner wishes to make a change to a building that is within the 30-metre setback and would expect that - in the situation where buildings are on an island aad cannot meet the setback - good sense would prevail in allowing reasonable changes to be made.

Accordingly, I support the option suggested in the Planning Report that section 5.11 be retained. For clarity, I might suggest that section 5.11 begin with the sunple statement: “A building permit is required for the replacement/reconstruction of buildings or structures.” Otherwise, my earlier comments stand and I continue to support the proposed housekeeping amendments. Respectfully, Pamela Jones

Begin fonvarded message: From: Pamela Jones maddoabtw@amail.com

Subject: Comment on proposed amendments to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law Date: April 21, 2016 at 8:04:46 PM EDT To: Lindsay Mills lmills@southfrontenac.net

Cc: Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net Angela Maddocks <amaddocks @ southfrontenac.net>

[covering note removed] Subject: Comment regarding proposed amendments to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law To the members of Council of the Township of South Frontenac: A. Introduction:

2

Page 97 of 136

Thank you for the invitation to comment on the proposed amendments. My comments are outlined below. Should you have any questions or require further information, please contact

me at your earliest convenience. B. Subject:

There are proposed amendments to the bylaw that propose to offer greater clarity concerning an owner’s desire to build (or re-build) within the 30-metre (100-foot) edge of a body of water. C. Objective:

The existing “rule” (policy) is that construction may not take place within 30 metres of a body of water. The intent is to preserve the integrity of the body of water by preserving the natural state of the land beside the body of water so that both flora and fauna on land and in the water may continue to thrive. This objective serves two purposes:

a) it respects the Township’s responsibility towards environmental protection; and

b) it ensures the continuing viability and desirability ofwaterfront properties for landowners, which in turn contributes to the economic well-being of the Township, recognizing that a significant portion of the taxation base relies on waterfront property valuations.

D. Intent of Proposed Amendments:

My understanding is that the proposed amendments target the following outcomes: a) where an existing building is within the 30-metre zone, its existence is grandfathered, but no additional construction may take place;

b) where a property owner wishes to upgrade or extend a building on the property, that building must be constructed in accordance with current zoning (i.e. a setback of 30 metres from the

water’s edge), irrespective of where an original building (often pre-dating the current zoning

provisions) may have been built;

c) where an “act of God” (e.g. tornado, fire) destroys or significantly damages a grandfathered building, it is reasonable and fair to allow repair/reconstruction of that same building profile in situ; and

d) whereas neglect or other actions (or failure to act) on the part of the owner may necessitate significant repair/rebuilding of a building, this situation should not confer the same

status/outcome as under item (c) above, but rather such situations should trigger the requirement to build with a setback of 30 metres from the water’s edge, as described in item (b) above. E. Comment:

a) I am fully in support of the proposed amendments, as they seek to meet the overall objective of preserving the integrity of the body of water and the corresponding results outlined under Objective above.

b) While one might empafhize with the desire of an individual property-owner to “upgrade/expand” a building within the 30-metre zone, I believe this is a situation where the

good of the environment and the overall integrity of Township lands and economy are sufficient justification for the provision.

c) As a side note: I am aware of a similar context in the Canadian Shield area of Quebec where a property owner is being required to move an existing building from its current (nonconforming) location to behind the 30-metre line.

d) I believe it is appropriate to require approval of all non-conforming building proposals to go

through the minor variance application process. Where the circumstances indicate that an act of

God has necessitated repairs (item D(c) above), then the Authority will be able to review and confirm that an existing building is simply being maintained; and, where upgrade/extension is

being contemplated, the Authority will likewise have the mandate and responsibility to require 3

Page 98 of 136

that the building be done to meet current zoning/by-law requirements; i.e. that it be behind the 30-metre boundary.

e) Over time, this approach should provide for more and more buildings to exist behind the 30metre boundary, thus supporting the overall objective of the policy/rule. F. Conclusion:

I trust that Council members will see the logic of this approach and support the proposed

housekeeping amendments. Respectfully, Pamela Jones

Owner: 1197A James Wilson Road (on Canoe Lake)

4

Page 99 of 136

Lindsay Mills From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Wayne Orr May-10-16 4:22 PM

Angela Maddocks Lindsay Mills May 17 R/V: “Housekeeping” Amendments

Please add their contact info to our lake association list Thanks

Wayne Orr Chief Administrative Officer

Township of South Frontenac Box 100, Sydenham ON KOH 2TO 613-376-3027 Ext 2225

613-376-6657 (Fax)

–Original Message–

From: harbisonburtsue@email.com rmailto:harbisonburtsue(5»email.com] Sent: May-10-16 4:19 PM

To: Wayne Orr worr@southfrontenac.net Subject: “Housekeeping” Amendments Dear Mr. Orr;

I have just learned of the consideration being given to making changes in the 30 meter setback bylaws. I have serious objections to these changes. I am the president of the West Devil Lake Property Owners Group/ eighty property owners on the west end of Devil Lake. Our community was developed in the late fifties and sixties and cottages were designed/ sited and built adhering to all building regulations in force at the time. If the bylaws are changed and. God forbid, one of our members should lose their cottage due to forces beyond their control, the proposed by-laws might prohibit them from ever rebuilding,

WDLPOG (the acronym for our group) has been active stewards of Devil Lake for many/ many years. We test our waters monthly and are proud to say the province has continuously rated West Devil Lake in the highest category of cleanliness. We council our new owners on good lake stewardship habits and keep a vigilant eye out for anyone “breaking the rules”. In addition/ we have contributed to South Frontenac Township through our taxes while getting relatively little in return. As seasonal owners, we do not look to the township for our children’s education, our senior

citizens’ assistance or other benefits regularly afforded full-time residents of the Township. Mostly, we get our trash and recycling picked up once a week and even then we have had to pay at least partially for our own bins.

While we support the township’s efforts to be good caretakers of our lakes and streams, we are opposed to new bylaws that take away our rights as property owners. Please be very careful as you deliberate. Sincerely yours, G. Burton Harbison

Page 100 of 136 President, West Devil Lake Property Owners Group E-mail: wdlpog@gmail.com

Cottage Address: 45 Shoal Lane/ RR2, Westport, ON, KOG 1X0 Cottage Phone: 613-4548 Residence: 28 Fir Tree Lane, Jamesville, NY 13078 Home Phone: 315-446-3484

2

Page 101 of 136

May 7,2016

Municipal Council of the Township of South Frontenac 4432 George St.

Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2TO

RE: Housekeeping Bv-Law to Amend Bv-Law Number 2003-75: Sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 Dear Council:

We are seasonal property owners on the north branch of Buck Lake as recent as July 2013. This

proposed by-law amendment is very disconcerting and we are strongly opposed to it being passed at council. We echo those who have already voiced their concerns of not supporting these amendments. The changes directly affect our property as our lot size, location and terrain make it impossible to rebuild according to the 30-metre setback.

As property owners/tax payers/ one would think we would have the right to be properly notified by SFT regarding such amendments that have a “negative” impact on our waterfront property. The March 2016 interim tax notice would have been an excellent means of communicating this proposed by-law amendment to allow public input from all concerned. But how ironic, both March 2015 & June 2015 interim tax notices provided us with a 2-pg news bulletin that clearly provides the names, phone numbers and email addresses of all council members and in black bold letters it indicates. Council

members are here to help…Contact us

.<t

Therefore, on behalf of waterfront property owners/taxpayers of South Frontenac Township who do not support these chanees, this is our call for help to council members to reject the proposed by-law amendments to sections 5.10.2 and 5.11 of By-Law Number 2003-75. Regards/ Marg&Greg Alien 1134 Sawmill Lane

e-copy:

Mayor Ron Vandewal Councillors

SFTCAO/WayneOrr SFT Planner, Lindsay Mills

Page 102 of 136

Initial Independent Review of Hartington Development Proposal

Prepared for: Michelle Foxton Wade Leonard John Lesperance Charlie Labarge

Prepared by Wilf Ruland (P. Geo.) 766 Sulphur Springs Road Dundas, Ontario L9H 5E3 (905) 648-1296 deerspring1@gmail.com

May 10, 2016 page 1

Page 103 of 136

Introduction I am a hydrogeologist, and I have worked as an environmental consultant for 30 years (2 years for a larger firm in Germany, and 28 years independently in Canada). I am an expert in water resource and contamination issues, and have dealt with many such issues over the course of my consulting career. A copy of my Curriculum Vitae is available upon request. I have completed an initial independent review of information which has been provided, regarding a development proposal to build 13 homes (each with its own well and septic system) within the Hartington hamlet boundary. My understanding is that the current proposal follows an original application for 47 residential lots on a 45 hectare property, which has been reduced by focussing the development proposal on the northern part of the property within the hamlet. However there is no indication that the proponent has abandoned earlier plans to develop numerous additional lots on the remaining lands outside of the Hartington hamlet boundary. A total of 13 residential, 0.8 hectare lots with a minimum lot frontage of 45 meters are currently proposed within the hamlet as described in the October 9, 2015 FOTENN letter to Frontenac County. The proposed lots are long and skinny in shape, and if approved would allow 13 homes to be squeezed into the Hartington hamlet boundary. The density of the current proposal is somewhat higher than that of the original proposal. There are about 44 homes currently within the Hartington hamlet boundary, and as such the proposed development represents a 30% increase in the number of homes (and wells and septic systems) in the hamlet. The question which needs to be clearly answered (and which has not been properly addressed to date) is whether a 30% increase in the number of homes, wells and septic systems in Hartington is sustainable and can be accommodated without causing unacceptable impacts on the Hartington Aquifer and the domestic wells which it supplies. The following sections of this review are intended to address this question, based on the information which is currently available.

Hydrogeological Conceptual Model In the documents which I have reviewed the proponent’s hydrogeologists have not really provided a coherent conceptual model for the groundwater flow system in the Hartington area. However without an understanding of the big picture, I believe that any attempt to assess the potential impacts of the proposed development risks missing the mark. My conceptual model for the hydrogeology of the Hartington area is presented in the following sections of this review. page 2

Page 104 of 136

a) Topography and Geology There is a very thin overburden or soil layer (usually less than 1 meter thick) overlying the bedrock throughout the Hartington area - the overburden is generally not a serious impediment to vertical groundwater movement. Underlying the overburden is the fractured limestone bedrock of the Gull River formation, which in turn is underlain by Precambrian “granite” bedrock. The Precambrian bedrock surface is found at about 130 meters above sea level (or masl) which is about 30 meters below ground surface (or mbgs). Hartington is situated on an upland or plateau, which is bounded on three sides by considerably lower-lying lands. The elevation difference between the upland including the area of the proposed development property (at 160 to 165 masl) and the surrounding low areas (at <140 to <145 masl) is on the order of 20-25 meters. b) Hartington Aquifer and Local Groundwater Flow Directions The main groundwater flow system in the Hartington area is situated in the fractured limestone bedrock. Because this bedrock flow system can often yield sufficient water for residential water supply purposes it is referred to as an “aquifer”. In this review I will refer to the local limestone bedrock aquifer which is found in the upland area and which includes the development property and the hamlet of Hartington as the “Hartington Aquifer”. There does not appear to be any impediment to vertical groundwater movement in the Hartington Aquifer. The underlying Precambrian bedrock is much less desirable and reliable as a groundwater resource, and will not be discussed further in this review. The area of the hamlet and its surroundings (including the proposed development property) is a “recharge area” for the Hartington Aquifer. This means that groundwater movement will have a downward component from the ground surface into the underlying aquifer. Rainfall onto the upland area seeps into the ground, and flows downward into the Hartington Aquifer as it moves outward toward the margins of the upland. Groundwater discharge is occurring all along the margins of the upland, with water discharging from the ground in seeps and springs and flowing into the surrounding surface water bodies and/or wetlands (which can be seen on maps and photos of the area). Groundwater movement in the aquifer is through cracks and fractures in the bedrock there is no groundwater movement through the intact blocks of rock between fractures. page 3

Page 105 of 136

Directions of lateral groundwater movement are influenced by topography, by local discharge points such as springs, and by significant withdrawls of groundwater (from wells). Flow directions can change if groundwater usage patterns change, and the introduction of a cluster of new domestic wells can induce groundwater to move toward the wells - notwithstanding prior directions of groundwater movement. c) Hydraulic Conductivity of Hartington Aquifer Hydraulic conductivity is the key parameter used in describing a geologic formation. For some reason there are no estimates of the hydraulic conductivity of the Hartington Aquifer in the proponent’s documentation for the development proposal. I have calculated aquifer hydraulic conductivities from the pump test results provided by the proponent on pages 13 to 17 of the ASC Environmental report of October 21, 2013 (assuming an aquifer thickness of about 30 meters). The hydraulic conductivities range from 3 x 10-7 m/s to 2.3 x 10-4 m/s, putting most of them into the range for karst limestone aquifers shown in Table 2.2 of the hydrogeology reference textbook by Freeze and Cherry (1979). I have significant concerns about the way the pumping tests were conducted, and these concerns are discussed in more detail in Section 3c of this review. That having been said, on the face of it these hydraulic conductivities are a strong indication that karstic dissolution of the limestone bedrock aquifer is occurring in the Hartington area. I believe that the proponent’s impact assessment documents should have clearly indicated that karstic hydraulic conductivities were determined to be present in the Hartington Aquifer based on the pumping test analyses which have been carried out. d) Karst Development In limestone bedrock the movement of groundwater through fractures can cause the bedrock to slowly dissolve along those fractures and make them wider, which leads to more groundwater flow and further bedrock dissolution. This progressive process of dissolution and increasing groundwater flow can over time lead to conduits and channels opening up the bedrock, which have much higher permeability and carry most of the moving groundwater in areas where they are present. This process of progressive limestone bedrock dissolution over time can lead to characteristic features forming at the ground surface (such as grikes, sinkholes, and springs) and in the subsurface (such as flow channels and conduits, and in extreme cases caves). These sorts of features in a limestone aquifer are called “karst” features, and the processes which form such features are called karst processes. page 4

Page 106 of 136

There are karstic surface features in the vicinity of Hartington including numerous grikes, sinkholes, and karst springs. Apparently small caves have also been seen in exposed rock faces in a quarry just to the north of Hartington. I visited this quarry when I toured the area, and while I did not see any caves there was certainly plenty of evidence of karstic dissolution processes at work in some areas of the quarry. Other areas of the quarry showed little evidence of karstic dissolution. This sort of variability in karstification is not uncommon, and where it occurs it means that groundwater flow conditions will likewise be quite variable. In places where karstic bedrock dissolution processes have caused enlargement of the bedrock fractures, those fractures will be preferential pathways for groundwater (and contaminant) movement. There is no way of knowing where these enlarged fractures may be found within the 3-dimensional bedrock groundwater flow system, and as a result the local groundwater flow system is very complex and unpredictable. The Hartington Aquifer comprises a complex and variable groundwater flow system, which in some areas is highly permeable and strongly interconnected and in others much less so. But there generally seem to be enough vertical fractures to convey groundwater from the ground surface deep into the bedrock flow system. The presence of karst features and karstic hydraulic conductivity are key indicators of aquifer vulnerability, which is discussed in more detail in the next section of this review. e) Vulnerability of the Hartington Aquifer The Hartington aquifer is classified in groundwater vulnerability maps as “moderately to highly vulnerable”. In my professional opinion, this classification doesn’t quite hit the mark. The Hartington Aquifer is highly vulnerable. The aquifer is showing troubling signs of surface contamination across the area of the hamlet of Hartington. In a February 9, 2010 report on E-coli contamination of well water at 3 homes in Hartington, Mr. Frank Crossley who is a hydrogeologist for the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) has stated that the following: “The study area is classified as “environmentally sensitive” due to the geology. The thin to nonexistent overburden cover provides minimal attenuation capabilities. The overburden overlies fractured bedrock. Contaminants on or near the surface migrate vertically with gravity through the thin soils with minimal attenuation and into the fractured bedrock to the underlying aquifer. The contaminants then migrate with the shallow groundwater flow”.

page 5

Page 107 of 136

I agree entirely with the above statements by Mr. Crossley. The Hartington Aquifer is a vulnerable or sensitive aquifer. Mr. Crossley’s report described the contamination of 3 domestic wells in Hartington by E-coli and coliform bacteria, caused by a nearby agricultural operation. There is plenty of other evidence of the vulnerability of the Hartington Aquifer: • Coliform bacteria were found at some point in testing done on 7 of 10 wells installed by the proponent for the proposed development. If bacteria are present in well water, then this is strong evidence of vulnerability to surface contamination. • Nitrate was also found to be present in tests done on 8 of 10 wells installed by the proponent for the proposed development. Nitrate is one of the primary contaminants of concern in the discharges from domestic septic systems. The presence of nitrate in local groundwater is also evidence of contamination entering the aquifer from the ground surface. • Many local residents have come forward with their concerns about the development proposal, and have shared information about the vulnerability of the aquifer to surface contamination including numerous existing problems. In this highly vulnerable aquifer, every new well increases the draw on the aquifer and increases the rate of downward groundwater movement. This means that surface contaminants are drawn downward into the aquifer more quickly. Likewise every new septic system increases the loading of nitrate (and bacteria, if malfunctioning) into the shallow groundwater, which is then drawn downward into the deeper parts of the aquifer which are tapped by domestic wells. f) The Hartington Aquifer seen from a Groundwater Resource Perspective From the perspective of water quantity, the Hartington Aquifer is a limited resource, which is significantly constrained by its setting in an upland surrounded on three sides by much lower lying discharge areas. The upper 20-25 meters of the aquifer are only recharged from infiltration of precipitation, with lateral inflow of groundwater not possible because the aquifer is truncated at the margins of the upland. The other major limitation on the quantity of groundwater which is available in the Hartington Aquifer is its low porosity, which severely limits the ability of the aquifer to absorb infiltrating precipitation. More than the usual amount of precipitation is lost to surface runoff in the Hartington area. page 6

Page 108 of 136

In addition lateral losses of groundwater from the aquifer due to groundwater discharge in seeps and springs at the margins of the upland cause further depletion of groundwater from the aquifer. Lateral losses of groundwater are facilitated by flow through higherpermeability karst channels where these are present. The residual amount of groundwater (after the lateral outflow losses) has to support all of the domestic wells, farm wells, and higher-draw wells (like the local car wash) which are already present in the Hartington area. Accounts from local residents confirm that the limits of the Hartington Aquifer to provide a reliable supply of groundwater are being reached. There are reports of well yields dropping hard during dry periods, and even of wells going dry temporarily. It is my professional opinion that the Hartington Aquifer is showing unmistakeable signs of stress from a groundwater resource perspective. It is currently being utilized at/or beyond its sustainable limit, and showing clear signs of unsustainable usage in places including reduced amounts of water available to individual wells and deteriorating groundwater quality. 3) The Proponent’s Impact Assessment a) Introduction To the extent that it has been completed, the hydrogeological impact assessment for the development proposal (13 residential lots on about 11 hectares) is provided in letters from ASC Environmental dated October 29, 2015 and December 3, 2015. An incomplete and inadequate assessment of hydrogeological impacts from the earlier, larger 47-lot development proposal was also provided in earlier ASC Environmental reports. I have numerous issues with the impact assessment of the development proposal contained in the various reports prepared for the proponent. I see no sign in them that the big picture has been considered, or that there is a functional conceptual model which reflects the real world hydrogeological conditions in and around the hamlet of Hartington. The stressed nature of the Hartington aquifer from a groundwater resource perspective has not been recognized, and the aquifer’s vulnerability to surface contamination has been acknowledged but then ignored in what has been presented as an impact assessment of the proposal. Moreover, there appear to have been significant problems including a number of errors in methodology, which are described in the following sections of this review.

page 7

Page 109 of 136

b) Application of Procedure D-5-4 Regarding Nitrate Impacts The proponent has presented several calculations of nitrate loading in the various documents prepared by ASC Environmental, purportedly in order to meet the requirements of MOECC Procedure D-5-4 (Technical Guideline for Individual On-Site Sewage Systems - Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment). In all cases the approach taken was less precautionary than required by MOECC Procedure D-5-4, and in fact the overall approach taken seems to be at odds with what is required under Procedure D-5-4. The approach taken by the proponent starts with the “Three Step Process” outlined in Section of 5.2 of Procedure D-5-4. It ignores this statement from the second paragraph of Section 5.2: “The process is dependent on first satisfying the general requirements defined in Sections 4.0 and 5.1”. It is my professional opinion that this proposal does not meet the general requirements defined in Sections 4.0 and 5.1 of MOECC Procedure D-5-4, and thus that the nitrate loading calculations presented for the proponent are almost certainly not applicable to this proposal. I believe that the following conditions which apply to this development proposal in the Hartington Aquifer mean that it does not meet the general requirements defined in Sections 4.0 and 5.1 of Procedure D-5-4: • the site does not comply with some requirements of Ontario Regulation 358; • existing nitrate levels of 0-10 mg/L are not likely due to historical agricultural practices; • the area is obviously hydrogeologically sensitive (as per Mr. Crossley’s report); • there is karst-enhanced hydraulic conductivity of bedrock in the Hartington Aquifer; • there are areas of fractured bedrock exposed at surface and/or thin soil cover; • the development proposal has a greater density than previous development proposals; • the scale of the proposal (a 30% increase in the number of homes, wells and septic fields in the hamlet) is such that an increased degree of assurance is appropriate; • there is existing groundwater contamination by nitrate and bacteriological pathogens (and petroleum hydrocarbons from a former service station) in the aquifer. page 8

Page 110 of 136

Given the above conditions, it is my professional opinion that the proponent should have gone through the process of determining whether designation under Notice 3-87 is required - if it is then MOECC Policy 15-08 applies to this development proposal. There is no information presented in any of the development proposal documents to suggest that the proponent has gone through this determination process (which is required by Procedure D-5-4). Thus the nitrate loading calculations which have been prepared are almost certainly not applicable. A different process (designation under Notice 3-87, followed by application of MOECC Policy 15-08) most likely applies to this proposal. I recommend that this matter be brought to the attention of the Director of Planning for the County of Frontenac as soon as possible. The Hartington Aquifer is a highly vulnerable aquifer, and the question of whether this proposal should be designated under Notice 3-87 should be carefully considered by the County in order to ensure public health and safety are properly protected. c) Problems with Pump Tests It is my position that the pump tests for the development proposal were not conducted properly, and should not be considered to provide an accurate assessment of the hydrogeological characteristics of the Hartington Aquifer. The deficiencies in the pump testing (all of which have the effect of making the aquifer appear to be better able to support the proposed development) included the following:

• the first set of pump tests were conducted during the wettest time of the year, and the second set of pump tests were done during an unusually wet period in summer;

• the water being pumped from the wells during pump tests was discharged to the ground surface in the immediate vicinity of the wells, and as such there is a strong possibility that short-circuiting (infiltration of the pumped water and recharge of the aquifer around the well) occurred;

• the second set of water samples (which are supposed to be taken at the end of the pump tests) were often taken earlier in the tests;

• hydraulic fracturing of at least some wells appears to have been carried out but not disclosed by the proponent (for more details please see Section 3e below);

• the fractured limestone bedrock aquifer was assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic (ie. to have uniform hydraulic characteristics in all directions and dimensions) in the pump test evaluations which were done. page 9

Page 111 of 136

d) Assumptions About the Hartington Aquifer There are a series of unwarranted and invalid assumptions which underlie the proponent’s description of the local hydrogeology, which include:

• the finite, upland nature of the Hartington Aquifer has not been recognized instead there is an implicit assumption that there are no constraints on the system;

• an assumed effective porosity of 10% has been applied to the aquifer, despite evidence which suggest it is considerably lower;

• as mentioned above, the fractured limestone bedrock aquifer was assumed to have uniform hydraulic characteristics in all directions and dimensions;

• the fact that the Hartington Aquifer is already showing obvious signs of stress from a groundwater resource perspective has not been recognized or addressed.

e) Hydraulic Fracturing It has come to my clients’ attention that there are persistent accounts from local residents and at least one Township Councillor that the proponent has conducted hydraulic fracturing of one or more of the monitoring wells which were drilled for the proposed subdivision. If hydraulic fracturing has taken place, then this is very significant information which should have been immediately disclosed in the technical reports prepared by the proponent’s consultants. Hydraulic fracturing can affect both the quantity of water available from a well, as well as the quality. It can also affect other wells in the vicinity, and such effects can be negative and can be permanent. It is incumbent upon the proponent to immediately disclose the full details of all hydraulic fracturing which has taken place, including the particulars of each event such as:

date and time of the event, and the well which was fracked;

the name and contact information of the firm which did the work;

target depth interval(s);

precautions taken;

quantity of fracturing fluid and pressure used for each depth interval;

composition of fracturing fluid including any proppants or other additives to the water;

water chemistry test results for the fracturing fluid; and

all results of subsequent testing of the well (both hydraulic testing and testing for water quality) including date(s) and time(s) of such testing. page 10

Page 112 of 136

Complaints to the professional association of the proponent’s consultants can be considered if full disclosure about all fracking which was done is not provided.

Stormwater Management Based on the documentation available to me, the proponent does not appear to have submitted a proper stormwater management plan for the 13-lot development proposal. While a stormwater management plan was developed for the earlier 47-lot proposal, there is no commitment by the proponent to implement anything resembling that plan. The October 19, 2015 FOTENN letter in support of the proposed development indicates that there will be a total of 4 sets of north-south running ditches to carry surface runoff and drainage southward from the proposed residential lots with 3 of the ditches discharging to the Pleasant Valley Drain. No stormwater management pond is planned to receive the flows from these ditches, and as a result I expect that the proposed development will likely worsen the existing local flooding problems along the Pleasant Valley Drain.

Proposed Individual Lot Assessment - Hydrogeological Methodology In response to concerns which have been expressed by local residents and by the professionals who have reviewed the development proposal, ASC Environmental (ASC) has put forward the suggestion that there could be a lot by lot assessment of the groundwater resource - with non-viable lots being kept fallow with no development. While this sounds like a prudent way to propose development on the subject lands, there are huge problems with what has been put forward by ASC (in a letter from ASC dated June 23, 2015 to the County of Frontenac). Shortcomings of this proposal include:

insufficient details on exactly what is to happen;

a series of qualifications which undermine the proposal;

no specification of triggers for declaring a lot non-viable;

parts of the proposal have been overtaken by subsequent proposals or statements from ASC and/or others on the development team;

the proposal is not worded prescriptively, and as result the apparent commitments are not enforceable. page 11

Page 113 of 136

In my professional opinion the proposal described in the ASC Environmental letter of June 23, 2015 is currently not a proposal which can be taken seriously. It is not in any way enforceable, and it commits the proponent to nothing except for an “evaluation process” whose parameters are not adequately defined. In its current form, the proposal described in the ASC Environmental letter of June 23, 2015 provides no protection to families living in the hamlet of Hartington. 6) Impacts of Proposal on Aquifer Contamination by Petroleum Hydrocarbons In the materials presented to me for review, there is unsettling evidence that there is an area of ongoing petroleum hydrocarbon contamination of the Hartington Aquifer near the main intersection in town (centered on the site of a former service station at Boyce Road and Highway 38). The contamination appears to have been caused by leakage of gasoline from the former service station many years ago. Site investigation activities and some remediation have been carried out in recent years. I have real concerns about the adequacy of the investigation of the contamination site, and about the remedial works which have been carried out to date. Some information has been provided and further information will be sought through an Access to Information request. In the meantime it appears (based on the currently available information) that the remediation of the site may not have been properly completed, and that the site investigation and remediation activities may have had the unintended effect of mobilizing the contamination which has been detected spreading into the aquifer from the site. Current groundwater flow directions are poorly defined, but so far there have been no reports of local domestic wells being contaminated. It is quite possible that the 30% increase in the number of wells which the development proposal represents will reverse local groundwater flow directions, and induce flow from the contaminant site toward the proposed subdivision. Impacts on local wells appear likely if this scenario comes to pass. The prudent thing to do would be to place a temporary moratorium on development in Hartington until: • full details about the remediation which has been done to date have been made publicly available and have been assessed for their adequacy, • the contaminant concentrations and the dimensions of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume (and the threat it poses to local wells) have been adequately defined, and • any further remedial work which is considered necessary has been completed. page 12

Page 114 of 136

Discussion and Conclusions The proposed development property is an important area of groundwater recharge for the Hartington Aquifer. Currently clean water from rainfall onto the property infiltrates into the ground and replenishes the aquifer, which supplies drinking water to the wells of the homes in the hamlet and its surroundings. Groundwater flow directions in the area of the hamlet including the area of the development proposal are downward from the ground surface into the aquifer, and then outward toward the slopes which mark the margins of the upland to the northwest, north, northeast, east and southeast. The Hartington Aquifer is highly vulnerable to surface contamination, and there are already troubling signs of surface contamination including the presence of bacteriological contamination and nitrate in wells which tap the aquifer. The Hartington Aquifer is also stressed from a groundwater resource perspective. The aquifer is limited in physical extent, and is truncated by the surrounding lowlands. I have not been able to find any recognition of the physical limitations of the aquifer in the documentation put forward by the proponent. The existing draws on the aquifer from the homes and from heavy water users (such as the car wash) have stretched the aquifer to its sustainable limit - and in some places to beyond the limit. There are already clear signs of unsustainable usage including reduced amounts of water available to wells during dry periods and deteriorating groundwater quality. If the development proceeds then the current mix of farm fields and woodlands which do not impede recharge or otherwise impact the Hartington Aquifer would be replaced by a development with an access road and 13 residential lots (each with a driveway, home, well, and septic system). Each of these features can have negative effects on groundwater supplies, and the sheer size of the development means that the combined effects of the proposal are likely to negatively affect domestic water supplies in the area. The 13-lot development proposal represents a 30% increase in the number of homes in the hamlet. I believe it is likely that the 30% increase in the number of homes, wells and septic systems in the hamlet will have major impacts on the water supplies of existing homes in terms of water quality and/or the quantity of available water supplies. There are numerous problems with the impact assessment carried out on behalf of the proponent, as described in detail in Section 3 of this review. In my professional opinion the impact assessment is inadequate and technically deficient, and much of it needs to be redone. page 13

Page 115 of 136

As discussed in Section 3b I believe that this development should be designated under Notice 3-87, which would result in MOECC Policy 15-08 applying to this development proposal. Under Policy 15-08 a different set of calculations than those employed by the proponent’s consultants would be required to assess nitrate loading of the aquifer. In addition and as outlined in Section 3e, there are persistent accounts that the proponent has conducted hydraulic fracturing of one or more of the monitoring wells which were drilled for the proposed subdivision. If hydraulic fracturing has taken place, then this is very significant information which should have been immediately disclosed in the technical reports prepared by the proponent’s consultants. Hydraulic fracturing can affect both the quantity of water available from a well, as well as the quality. It can also affect other wells in the vicinity, and such effects can be negative and can be permanent. It is incumbent upon the proponent to immediately disclose the full details of any hydraulic fracturing which has taken place. As discussed in Section 4 of this review I have not seen a proper stormwater management plan for the proposal, and there appear to be no plans for a stormwater management pond. Instead a series of 4 ditches are proposed, and 3 of these ditches will facilitate the flow of stormwater and snowmelt to the Pleasant Valley Drain - where they will exacerbate existing flooding problems downstream of the site. The presence of a petroleum hydrocarbon spill site (of unknown dimensions) in the middle of the hamlet introduces major complications to the matter, as described in Section 6 of this review. It appears that the remediation of the site may not have been properly completed, and that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination which was present has been mobilized and is spreading in the aquifer. There is a significant possibility that if the proposed development proceeds, then it will change groundwater flow and contaminant transport directions in the hamlet. This may lead to contamination of domestic wells by petroleum hydrocarbons. In many rural hamlets and settlements in Ontario there are unfortunate situations where vulnerable aquifers are overused, and families are drinking poor quality groundwater which has been contaminated by various surface contaminants including inadequately treated water from each others’ septic systems. The odds of this happening in Hartington will rise significantly if the proposed development proceeds. Based on my review of the currently available documentation it is my professional opinion that this proposal to build 13 homes within the hamlet of Hartington is not a sustainable development. I believe it is likely to cause unacceptably negative impacts on domestic groundwater supplies in the hamlet. As a result of all of the above, I do not believe that this development proposal is consistent with the relevant sections of the Provincial Policy Statement. page 14

Page 116 of 136

Recommendations Based upon my review of the currently available information I have the following recommendations to make regarding this matter.

The proponent should develop a conceptual model to describe the hydrogeology of the Hartington Aquifer. The model should fully account for what is currently known about the aquifer, including the karstification of parts of the aquifer and its physical limitations given the lowlands which surround the Hartington area on 3 sides.

Better information is needed regarding groundwater flow directions in the hamlet of Hartington as follows. a) The monitoring wells at the site of the former service station should be surveyed for elevation, so that groundwater elevations can be expressed in meters above sea level and compared to information from the existing well network. b) The use of domestic wells in developing groundwater contour maps should be limited and/or qualified, as such wells are typically in frequent use and will provide water level readings which will tend be lower than surrounding monitoring wells and thus misleading. c) Information from any other public agency monitoring wells installed in the Hartington area should also be sought, in order to provide better coverage and more detailed information about groundwater flow directions. d) Additional monitoring wells should also be installed at various locations and depths.

I have grave concerns about the proponent’s technically deficient aquifer evaluation (by pump testing) and about the potentially erroneous application of MOECC Procedure D-5-4. These concerns should be brought to the attention of the Director of Planning for the County as soon as possible. It appears that large parts of the impact assessment will need to be redone. In addition full disclosure about all hydraulic fracturing which may have been carried out for the proponent is required.

It would be prudent to place a temporary moratorium on development in Hartington until the issues surrounding the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the center of the hamlet (including the threat which this contamination poses to local wells) have been properly resolved.

In my professional opinion, this proposal to build 13 homes within the hamlet of Hartington is not a sustainable development and it should not be approved. page 15

Page 117 of 136

Signature and Limitations This independent review has been prepared in its entirety by Wilf Ruland (P. Geo.). It is based on my honest conviction and my knowledge of the matters discussed herein following careful review of the available evidence and documentation. This independent review has been prepared for the use of my clients.

Signed on the 10th of May, 2016

Wilf Ruland (P.Geo.)

766 Sulphur Springs Road Dundas, Ont. L9H 5E3 Tel: (905) 648-1296 deerspring1@gmail.com

page 16

Page 118 of 136

From: “Minister (MAH)” minister.mah@ontario.ca Date: May 18, 2016 at 4:14:42 PM EDT To: Undisclosed recipients:; Subject: Inclusionary Zoning / Zonage d’inclusion Dear Head of Council, I am pleased to announce that the government introduced Bill 204 – the Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016 in the Legislature today. As part of our Long-Term Affordable Housing Strategy Update commitments, these proposed changes focus on transforming Ontario’s housing system by facilitating a greater range of housing choices and increasing the supply of affordable housing. Schedule 4 of the Bill would, if passed, support land-use planning decision makers in their efforts to increase affordable housing choices in their communities, by enabling municipalities to require the inclusion of affordable housing units in new residential development projects through inclusionary zoning. You can obtain a copy of Bill 204 – the Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016 and monitor the status of the Bill through the legislative process on the Legislative Assembly of Ontario website. Comments on Schedule 4 of the Bill can be made through the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry (EBR Posting #: 012-7616). The government is looking for your input on matters that may be considered for possible regulatory proposals to support the proposed inclusionary zoning legislation. Feedback can be provided through the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry (EBR Posting #: 0127617), through our Consultation Discussion Guide or by email to inclusionaryzoning@ontario.ca. I would also like to draw your attention to Schedule 5 of the proposed Bill that would, if passed, create consistent local enforcement of residential rental maintenance standards across all Ontario municipalities. This would not affect municipalities that currently enforce standards that are included in local property standards by-laws. Further details of these proposed amendments will be provided to affected municipalities in the near future. We look forward to working with you in the coming months on this exciting work. Best regards, Ted McMeekin Minister

Page 119 of 136

From: Sommer Casgrain-Robertson [mailto:sommer.casgrain-robertson@rvca.ca] Sent: May-20-16 6:52 PM To: Subject: EBR Posting of new Conservation Authorities Act Review Consultation Document Good afternoon municipalities, Last year, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) initiated a review of the Conservation Authorities Act by posting a discussion paper to the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry (EBR). In response to the comments received, the Ministry identified five priorities for updating the Act:

Strengthen oversight and accountability in decision-making.

Increase clarity and consistency in roles and responsibilities, processes and requirements.

Improve collaboration and engagement among all parties involved in resource management.

Modernize funding mechanisms to support conservation authority operations.

Enhance flexibility for the Province to update the Conservation Authorities Act in the future. Second Round of Consultation Last week the MNRF posted a new consultation document to the EBR called Conserving Our Future – Proposed Priorities for Renewal. This document represents the next stage of MNRF’s review of the Act and was created to help generate additional discussion related to the five priorities outlined above. · · ·

The new document can be accessed at www.ebr.gov.on.ca by searching for posting number 012-7583 The posting will be open for comment for 120 days until September 9, 2016. The MNRF will be hosting five facilitated regional multi-stakeholder engagement sessions on this document (listed below). These sessions will take place during the day, generally from 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. To register for a session individuals must send an RSVP to mnrwaterpolicy@ontario.ca indicating which session they would like to attend. The location and time of each session will be confirmed for those that RSVP. o Friday June 3, 2016 Eastern Ontario - Ottawa o Tuesday June 7, 2016 Northwestern Ontario - Thunder Bay o Thursday June 9, 2016 Southwestern Ontario - London o Monday June 13, 2016 Central Ontario - Newmarket o Wednesday June 15, 2016 Northeastern Ontario - Sudbury

RVCA Response · RVCA Staff will be reviewing MNRF’s new consultation document in the coming weeks. · We have scheduled a meeting for June 1 to discuss this consultation document with our fellow Eastern Ontario Conservation Authorities. · We will be attending MNRF’s June 3 consultation session in Ottawa. · Conservation Ontario is also reviewing this document and will be putting together draft EBR comments which will be reviewed at Conservation Ontario Council on June 27. · RVCA staff will then prepare an EBR submission for Board review (at either our July or August Board meeting) which will be circulated to our member municipalities for their consideration. If you have any questions about this EBR posting or the Conservation Authorities Act review please do not hesitate to contact me. Have a great weekend, Sommer

Page 120 of 136

Sommer Casgrain-Robertson General Manager / Secretary-Treasurer

Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Box 599, 3889 Rideau Valley Drive Manotick ON, K4M 1A5 613-692-3571 or 1-800-267-3504 ext. 1214 sommer.casgrain-robertson@rvca.ca www.rvca.ca

1I

Page 121 of 136

RECEIVED .>AY 1 8 20iS TOWNSHiP OF

SOUTH FRONTENAC J

^‘3^-..

14-39 Lm»on£.

I-‘S2V

GCt’^ m

‘.lt .I’’

!.-

i^.ifjS’COn, GM, t\

Town^rup OY Souirf Fron’venac, i-’-‘j.

71 i

I

I /

H^^f /

i/

-’

!

20^ 0

t-QH j.^Ui

4^3.’-i t-eor-ge S’^-r ©,:’.&_. byu£nhL’R., u,’;;, KOH 2TO GT Ccmnt-U

y^’t” h^lsiPO’y'3 1

i3S’C

.CQ you en July ?.?.:

i-.ro^fc

^

\

./oi5,,

‘.^srs fr.o.rcfii:

It*’

rf

1 Ct)»

I f

/

p.ii^ffnt; ims .cu

i’his ‘.s^.i.^&r-cor-rec^j.on^ ‘bo .-osc! nafi’ing in BeuYoru jLi.-’.^-c’r^c^. -nd LSH)/ others h.-.ve nut b^ffn Ensuerc.-d »:.nt.i con.s^qaent.1./ ti’fp’re hax t)e;3n nc

ach:’ ^ve

.”*

-t

u me-

f.

pr-ogr-^Sis in ge’u-fcing p.-opcr nainos on tiie rc^dyLy^., (.:) cyr, 5

.t

.r^ir uud ainr^r? ef’r-i

f

fr. ^r.lrttj ;n£; >-^;i%onable

n

*(

I

1 [.i^V£’ Wt) coi"i"ec viun^ ze^f: ‘co GG* lOHoyod.;r3.;tcn In excess o’,i r; do;-sii ),..3-c’:-^rs anc h^V^’-ecGiv^^ .’/h;’? .;‘oUow..nn .luo t. ;a 1.1/!’ i ON'1 isna t;pi0 POi-.i;‘i-TCf:L NlLLiiB ’thi3 c»o’?5 itot fcsc:^ “^spoti-^es^ i/o r"pn cut!^.tun.-’.(:^.v;’.ons« 1 knui-, 9t-^.thou’c ,. duub-i.r th^-c resen-c ^ ‘inr c^chp.no^ p x’i’i^rc bfi I PHft’ l^ECfcii ru;]ifi ^nou.in “nd 01 e ^C^NLf.i4 roridn T ijt’t^t :’.n^t; SOUL D,” ^n»N»^ ,‘xl K7: ;-1; .1. ffle:";bi:.’£ O’f councU £.tsaHSno;-» trtii AH f’lS^iT’:!"^ i^ re? oT c^e cofflLiLtnity ’ r*

I

i

L

Cf t ;..!::’

wsy’.r^

^

1 i.icor"i"eit:i” nai^lnpn .iy. .i.ettev o’r 17»7«i3 aiss;.£d .i;hat che fcrssec

be r-efiovec! ..^hs »“0l.i bcLninii roan, ^ h a f me n p 1 a c e {J ~T?y^fTo u -c r^ In th?, ^ Jievi;3i'1 :’l inuiCRt ;:.nou.ieugej, c.ons^ni; or approval uf LreseL’’”:., eci ‘cha^ cousin i’ BO:J Scanl^n*1 could be? holpfui :i.n ch^ cOi-re.ctiun or sh”? u bCtUuan ro^it &OiiifrAon3 on rai.mcil i w7is hpp^ful ;hr:‘i; aiy^ ron’Gsc-i’ .rhu t int:-aR^ o’i” (je^^ing ZQRIQ -tD’i-fR ^.01^ y;i.’l;,‘f OT .chs Scamirn nz^e on .vh&1>” rocd,

naffic?

rt

<

^

4*fl.

f T

.a

t:-c>.tf-“tff^ surh cont^c’i; fiss bet;n f.;:’.‘je

-i ni!

iur .;’:~;:L.!.‘ad tci notTi:y ».,.’:« r’^map^ Bob

and nuren:; C only

G’ .A f:ifliil>’ ov l^) plus (jrr.ndci’iildr^i) ‘surt’;.ving (-iesber 1-* oulU COliU, ^{1t’f?? on a .!it>;in<j i”!:-“fflC .or thR .oad,T,‘ifc t-,j;L,::KiD SCHNLAi1! ROA9 Li c en e n’a.h.i L..i to con%ifl£?r.^is reqrest^C ^:,r’iier please- rc?fflove ths T?r!BS(?e np.ne /rom vi’ie ssczini.Mn r’ced and consn].t i-^/ch .;iw Scan’Kn.T .eo chfe.- <Ji;s:Tr-’.;~d-“na mfc’ ;_. *- <”, .;‘C1” th(?ir .’.QiAa. I Y this h”-id occurred vhvn tii^ np,^1,n(j wi s. done-, i;hen tl’i^r’o out d hsvr b^c?n (jppo.‘uunity i’o’.” .:’n sevei-^l bcan:i.^n £f(d jL-r’e^-^e ^ibllny^ “-.

T

t I

Kppr-ccii.rcc ti’i.L* correc’c r-o^.d n^tnes^ ti’v th^ pre’^nt ^I(KC- .i;her’o ^r’s ^ Sre^ey^ i; no J. bcanJi-m .-^.blincj l-’.vi.iy -co idppr^ciav.? ;-.hR ir-:.;qu:i.r’:ld ci’^n^^^n W\E^ S.O^s .LS>

CO;;TnCTE:jLi

Tf

iti

LX’t’ftEa-jELY A^PORTft^T YH^T h.

.^.u.

Y f

.NFORiO Ti^T &Rl::3E£;:i

is L

H.-.vL ^iU T^Tita:R!::3T In OK l’lT TU t-i^c ‘i Ht £.R:F::S£E i^} ON THEIR RQnri.To

revQ-f3e -che HFU>n;ig tha-c hai: occu-red .i;h;- cofBpoumd n~me- “BRESE’I-HAN^.’t r;OH£’ ^3CiT:s vca^onnble? r.nd ffio^y l;’?i3.r -<;o t>^-: hr-.nnai:>, I’b f:.huu:td be? no’bc^ ti-i-‘b .i:h^rc? iW Haiina ..oaa.K, (Sp.fflc T^-iiiil,)’). Th^r-s 1-1^3 ijs^n r. (-lose r-^).,i-i;cur.~c?iri;;ly it no b’.’e’see? T^m:i.li^<s “.i<. ion%n^.p .J&^.‘G’.:’^ .t;fi3 bcan..%n ti’iRy -L^&ndsci school too :?vh ^i » Scan lan Rar.d detrsc-ls i’he jjiacym^nt of -ch@ Dre^c-;? nafiie’ on .bhe Lrc

^t

‘i’i’!"?m th:’.% I’^J.p.l^.o^Ktup LinfDrtun£i;e1y» One s^irn^iun rur nut

t’i;h tri^.

^…iij.ir.r

vh^ Q>{tr’T’fBcl>/ poor ,“oad nLfR:lnp ^,.;. ^,‘i;.“i^ .us’i;0f"y OT ti’ie

w&f..

a.ts-jer For- ^Licn sor-iou^ snd ‘.^.diculous n^fning ov i-.riOi-’.’.i’a’/io

zina

in^i^nr a-3

to ‘i;ne ,-pal i^^.StUn

T n 1 ?s

c; ^

.u ho

“^

npi^i:::r’

. ..- I

fflUCh ‘^00 51(Etpl:t.S’t;‘I.C rO^(iZ» I have conside’mblo the- si’i^‘ns’iul .i’o ..o^.d n^inp. m^h the nrintev i^ ho w^s un d Lr ri

1

ffii-‘S Wy irv<? £ p”>:-f:on i?ho had oppQr^un;’.-by co :’.nvuiv ?f q’d’.-t’e in 3.t’t3i"f&?r^ng urch the nKffl^nij pi"oc.L?F^s. Tiil^ p’s-rsun is <fu;.‘v;7A .-^

.^

Page 122 of 136

de’fc’n’cun^d to be ln’riu&nt;‘u:’, in natters thuk should no-i; bs? or concsrn to =^‘ni;len<; fier-. She has p>“av1ou^:i.y cr-^and probL’.c^ns rur of tn-? B,-e?^e yr.fiiiiy and

-.CE’ffis. inten’c :t;o fUi’thE’r hsr s.fiimo^ity fo.” thy ^r^sees. I;c is iy, beli"f .<;hrt Zi-ie {.{ £2(3 .:>1 fl ‘’.>”.’’ influ.sncf; vp di=^u^de <;rie n^mer .“rojii plp.cinq the -4 i

/

f

i-l.~(R

.”; t

4’.~sst?e n^fti.3 where

ITU"TTouTa seo’ii

u^serves to ^t

i’^

r

^T"F O.».i0^ ^ .t,“t1-T;5

.’^.Q

indit,’:idUt.ii£ sf’i’effd vhsd’l ti-ib ;:ir:es~:1T’’n:’-!i’:>c .snoul’.d b-? r-f?cof]n.‘i.z&G co<nFt.‘ht.‘‘rs and it wa^ placRu on -che Scaii.ir.n r-osd vO b^ interrfr-^^od a3 sn nonour bj.’-i; Nr.-^ ^not.nc?i

f*

I

n J^U .*.’,;

trif;

‘^o

^res&Gs and .& ii.’&jor ;’:nsUTt

It

^ri[» –5c~anTan s,

.-.

^>^m^<;^%Tr5r?,Kri&’,-^^ ^^

m& person ^o Mhudt 1 ffia”.£? rftVR.’"?nc:e has h.-ad

bo oh i/ne bc^ni^n roadu

.t;U

.uu

u^wawrt-.-< A^ ‘3-

ffiost fiifficuX’c to fic:cep^~^f=i^:i;~tt-i1:?T-e

^G\f

srai opportun:l.-cics .i;o at-GKc?; fcir-esc.-^s with vit-.r:’.olic .\nt,1 public cuit.fients, I

:.:i’“lfi ;..’

rf0

rsc^un

cf?nii"cnt h”.r- ^:. ^.n& plays ^“itfi i-i^r u’-.’n se’fc

.t;0

u’.’

r’uJ.^s.

TO ?:‘ctabnsi-i ;h3 correct nc.-.-:ios Piiir^:.l.^-.-tjo^l.<: pvobaiply sr-t’fice? to shot’-’.? M^.«n-*.Uk.i uiaawfttK.w .^K

I,

^^inclTLTi^s^?^‘a^pntJri^,^i^r’*fy^‘i^[?ilFty^Mlaccuu^?Rb^ll^^’^?‘JTOU^c’’; the nrnbiem. P^i’hap^ i^.vc? 5i?‘L; Ti.rrtn my r”?^^oninc[ -ru, IF. a bGt.te<” .3>ip:l.Ln;a^.on ffiff wi-iere c;y rc£san?.nr-t is wrong cr ho one .i3S tflQ .f iQnt .uU ^‘cL’fciil »hfci hi-i’coric :.ind hffyi-bRpt? can bii put for’ua.‘clo om 3. n on t ‘r i’ s^s i 1 ;>. o s . .-igh’-;s of p

.en.-* /-jaa nsfiun^.. c;:n advise

council

^^^^^^^w^v^^y~f

r*

.

Nmm*

h;-A’/e be?sn very ^ur-pr7,^%(j anct ci^^ppQin’i;ed ti^t af-cl’?r effort I h^ve no e.v^j^ncc that’ council in !U>‘in ration

f

i;h?ri;

-.

.i < ;»

.-.lAC:h tih:S considerate of the t’olu.fn-! of

.’.a> there veluc’l^.nco ‘vu b^ tr’.nsp^i’c’n’i/

i£vc’ (jiven,,

,-s Ll

?-n

.ch.3 doc^ions thai, cuunci?-. 1% ’nuking? Ary ti’iers indiv^ctu.^ls to lihora Louni-il cj;i.vc?^ protec-vion? 1 hop? tn-At cot.mcil. c’dn bGcoi;ts? srppur^lve; o’f~ tt-:e -,”:;quii”;ri nKffiR ch’^nyes for row-x n’ we r.."^ to honou-.- -h- np,?R2<-, of p^rsoi.s who g^vr-i the sup?’e’.(& ^BCi”?. .1c” in ‘-.idr, .>;hen :>t is i:npi3:""?.ti(./^ Uay . LEST ^ii FOF^ET!

Lr

0

i.J

^t: ch^nqs^ he-

to ^ e

Keffl^mur^.nci":St V:

Fc is i-ny hops ^n(j -‘xnec’v^tiun ti’i^i; cuuncil in c:unsu].;:-ition “ith i;h3 Sc^n’ii.ns cr-.n t’-or;:. ou’i; i;h3 de-fc^i.’.s of naming their roa^» ^.1 f’l.’t.-i^hor)o un^.t it 1^,1; to .lonour b-:? very sp&cit’l ..i^gn^.qo, 1 UK V;?

.-K;flE:C^f! “fcOUC ‘^hC

‘.5

benefits, or .i;h^ ‘rel/is^d ‘.’.ond nHfliinn, I

tt’i^‘y

Tht:- f.~ulou3.n(3 £r’e puK^^ive’ly impac-bed by .bhu

^.rs inFiiy anri fjUA^e va,‘if?<in ^

ihc- ^c-’nl^n?.?,. t:he Syt->^e&<:-.,

r’ov’.r:,oirA.

^ J^

i;ii^ n;:*(t!inn

r

ti’ie i-l£nrt?it^- th^:’ Turmcr

coLsncil., the

/

T

p^.‘Hfflc-d.’.c^y fi-i’-.^men. po.”. ice?, iuczl coifti^unicy, r^-i’vf-’ndcu in ‘u he tiron^ nar;p.ng b:? .c-tB’c ‘i;hosfA I’.n’.r-olved :s:a cof..fir,mit>’; touri:&-bs. “‘v ^v-esont ccmncily

“r. “r

\ f

:il; r /

r siiio’r’se Toy

I ‘i^V ‘’.:. 5 i3 ill C

/

v jf

t.nff:>.r LC Lt:?. on <^

i-:na

miui’tt no” ‘-nsn’i

to aff2 thy

cory^ct-‘dn

.I

P’i"CiJ,i.&fR

-f

<_

JL^. pi’::v:!.ous iet/i^rs

i

havs ^k-d ‘i;n^ ‘. uilu”;;,i’n3

Q qU:^10,i5 OY COtAnC-i.:L

bu-^ the/ i’la^^ no’s been £:n%(-;er5d 1

I’.nu

^ineci

tns

T.

t’JO ;t'0.:i(3£

4- n

(..ULst.’.on? I.

*1

/

~iLt\l ffionth ^as ‘^hi; nrnung Lo’iipl&’l’-.d?

^;

.J.i’i t_‘h£t; ^T’P.-^ £

.^,

I’ji’tp.t !.<i^ th’^ co(npo%i^fci.pn <n"aiEtS5) of cuuncll ‘..‘hen .bhe- n?.^in<;1 uccitrred?

‘’.i

4, 9oc^ pr’^r.en’fc council S’lave rf

.:‘jo r-oausy

a.i>’ concerns “t, hou’u the n-^iiinq of th os’:; t, .cr’ier-? EV’R concerns,, i-.tir.t: ?,re ^ncy?

1.’ cDuncii nroccods .v0 r.u’i/hor-.’.z^ th(5 chanq^:; th?,t ‘r sungest,: Fi’;h’?n count;:1.!

£&r^ ?,'>

I

?r.y

IL-

^

t

aKe .vuU CF^‘U’i

be ^n lan

TO.

-.f .ior nu:;.ny –o, A lnc1.ud;’s c?b:t.’t;ur.>ry

/our infor’iiia’clofin Pl^a^i? r’..-?pon(J

for Fpii;her’

ay lettci’. Bincer’e’ly; Free! t;, to

ft

l:t>‘ffS&9

J?^ d.f &^W^L

Page 123 of 136 ,T

.^f

v t

u .fri’.. ^L

‘£

?f / Q/ :/.

.f-n ^

‘f ^. ’n’

^

SCW.T. wwu “m?^ T.

^” w^^^ ^

Archdioteese <tf toRgston) Peacefully at Kingston ^Senerat Hc<sprtat- on Tftureday, Japuary 28. ‘>016 In nis QWi year fuller Scanteji w&s born on Auguis* 1^, 1i9&7, antf orelamed to the Ttoman CathpIiG pnesfliwxi on M&y 22, ^

1952 He served as Associate Pastor

at Sacred Mean of Jesus Pansh, Marmora, snd Sj; Bwi&de^. Oinfeb^

torn; 1Q5?-19@^ at St t?eter& RetnsFi. Ttenton,fTorMSS3-Wi.atSt Marfr& P@nsbt Praiscott, ftMB 1^®^7, ar^ait

St Johrfe[Panshi Kingston, fiom 19574959 tie ^rvsd flis Pastof at St

Daniel’s Parish, Sotrfh Mourtsuh, from I^Sa-1967, .at Saeied Heart Pansh,

Mgrmota, antf 3t @emadeae.‘0rmsby {rom ISSNarf, a? Baty Name sf Marsr Partsh, Marysvilte, ftom 1S77-1987. at St. Vincent de Paul, Deserento, from

1981-1^87, and at St GartiaghB Pansb, TViB6d< ‘and SF Ertmund^

Bapsh. Su?6o. ftpffi fS8 -2SOG^ fathei Scanlan was a !3ehwoci son of Ihe fate

-JfQhn Joseph SGaigten sqd EtfieT (Rariehyl S^anlan Dear fansther isf F ^IHB Sc^anla^ jpp^^^d by his sitriirtgs l^aty »= ^eeintoi, TeWee P Scanl&n, John G Scanlan (thx late Mary T), Wiffed B Seatflpri, M;*teseph Seaman ^ N& ftia), Jaffies L Stanlar^ ,G ((eMinBc.Einlan;wS M

Cecdia Vte.bft (Fraruas P) Fbn^fy lememfeeFBd.by ftis many nieces arid n0pbews ari^thwrferCthes Rtend&wiH

t» rscenretf at ftie GOHDOK F. TOI-PKINS FUNERAL HOF.<E, 48

Coteoiw Street (at^ Cte^f_St) on Safciiday. January 30, fr&m 2-4 pm,

on Sunday Jamiary^ from a-lp.ro

and ftero 7-^ pn . witha vi§d sennce at 7 p m Veitation will, cohtirtue on Monrtdy, Fetirusuy^ 1, -id OurLady of Sorriaws Ohapel, Row^lenGe Manor 275 Sydanham Strea, Ki&gstQTi. ftam 10 am yrtibf the Mass eft- ChnStfan

Burial at 11 am A reception W)H &e held at the Tuneral ftomfe until 1 pm Interment will follow at St Edward’s

^^ \ 3W^^^ For those wishing, ctonabohs to Ifte Pnestff Rs&remerttXjhd offSisAffihdioeQseof fangston. c^ to Un4 i^ Hosptels

vf,

^J^i^Btt^-^JR^ndtefiRe^ W^^^W^^t^Ws^ family On Ims cepdotefices wifli |ihaiingMerapnes*at wwwgftompkin&central ca ~J

< *

Cfintr^Che^e ? 1

1

.: ^SS£,W

-11;

Page 124 of 136 .:^"^
‘./,

-t ^

I

fl

\

.V-

May 12, 2016

-.1

-y t-

^

^ _i

T

Ron Vandewal

T -’tA:”.^

t^ -

C’-L. ..’;’-LK .Jrv. .;’:.‘M 1

r’-

1

Mayor, Township of South Frontenac

J t

…I.’..J1

P.O. Box 100

4432 George Street Sydenham/ ON KOH 2TO

(Ottawa Room 613

Justice Building Ottawa, Ontario K1AOA6

Re: Sunbury Road Emergency Detour Route (EDR)

TeL: 613-996-1955 Fax.: 613-996-1958

Dear Mr. Vandewal:

y^nsIUuency *_

841 Princess Street

Thank you for contacting me about the reconstruction costs for Sunbury Road to

Kingston, Ontario

accommodate its current usage as an Emergency Detour Route. It is vital that we ensure that our local infrastructure is properly funded and maintained/ a concern that I share with my municipal and provincial colleagues.

K7L1G7

Tel.: 613-542-3243 Fax.: 613-542-5461

I wilt keep this issue in mind when speaking to my provincial counterparts about

infrastructure within our riding, and I will work hard to secure funding for vital transportation routes such as the Sunbury Road EDR. Indeed, the Government of

Canada has made a historic investment in Canadian infrastructure, and it is in consultation with provincial and local government to determine how funds will be distributed. The Sunbury Road EDR is an example of the cycle of systemic underfunding of municipal infrastructure/ and we have the reasonability to work

Q^ak

with all stakeholders to end it.

Again, thank you for writing to me about the important issue. Sincerely,

Member of

Parliiimcnl / Dcputo Kingston und the Islands / Kingston /<..

et les lies

Mark.Gen’etsertgpari.gc.ca

Mark Gerretsen, M.P. Kingston and the Islands

@!tawa Piece 613

edifice de la Justice Ottawa (Ontario) K1AOA6

Tel.: 613-996-1955 Telec.: 613-996-1958

CPiramcriptwn /

841, rue Princess Kingston (Ontario) K7L1G7

Tel.: 613-542-3243 Telec.: 613-542-5461

1

MG/af

Page 125 of 136

< t

Muscular

DystrophyCanada

-^

Dystrophie

muscula ire Canada

May 16,2016 South Frontenac Fire Department - Sydenham Stadon Attn: Shane Kidd, Muscular Dystrophy Canada Chairperson 4233 Stagecoach Rd Sydenham,ON KOH 2TO Dear Shane,

Fire Fighters are critical to providing the support that people affected by a neuromuscular disorders need.

Since 1954, Ae charity of choice for Canadian Fire Fighters has been Muscular Dystrophy Canada and more than 60 years later this time-honoured tradition continues. Fire Fighters not only are our most

important stakeholder, but ate our best champions and ambassadors.

Last year Canadian Fire Fighters raised $3.3 million in support of those affected by neuromuscular

disorders. We are especially proud of the achievements and accomplishments of the Ontario Fire Fighters. From April 1” 2015 - March 31st, 2016, with the support of 265 Ontario Fire Departments / Associations, Ontario Fire Fighters together raised $1,192,712. Congratulations’

Thank you South Frontenac Fire Department - Sydenham Station for your dedication and commitment. Your generous gift of $1,268.01 during this past yeat is helping to change the lives of those affected. We are committed to improving the quality of life for the thousands of Canadians affected. From financial assistance

to emotional support, from advocacy to education, we are on the ground, giving support to everyday

Canadians in whatever they need Our research has led to advancements in treatments, and has helped Canadians with neuromuscular disorders live longer, more enriched lives.

Fire Fighter fundraising continues to be our largest and most significant source of revenue and we are

extremely proud to be your partner. Muscular Dysttophy Canada and Fire Fighters have been funding research and searching for a cure for neuromuscular disorders for more than 60 years. With die help of Fire Fighters, we continue to get closer.

Together Fire Fighters are saying I Can! If we all say I Can, We Will make a difference. Warmest Regards,

Utw^. Y^^mr( Pamela Musgrave Director of Revenue Development CO Mayor Ron Vandewal, Township of South [‘romcnac

Ontario & Nunavut Region, Ottawa Community Office: 150 Isabella Street, Suite 301, Ottawa, ON K1S 1V7 T 613.232.7334 1.866.337.3365 F 613.567.2288 W muscle.ca

A SPECIAL THANKS TO FIRE FIGHTERS AND CHAPTER VOLUNTEERS FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING WORK IN MOVING MUSCLES FOR MORE THAN 50 YEAR Taxation Charity Registration Number | 10775 5837 RR0001

Page 126 of 136 -I

Muscular

DystrophyCanada

Dystrophie

musculaireCanada

May 16,2016 South Frontenac Fire Department - Portland Station

Attn: Ron Neil, Muscular Dystrophy Canada Chairperson 3955 Harrowsmith Rd

Harrowsmith, ON KOH 1VO Dear Ron,

Fire Fighters are critical to providing the support that people affected by a neuromuscular disorders need.

Since 1954,the charity of choice for Canadian Fire Fighters has been Muscular Dystrophy Canada and more than 60 years later this time-honoured tradition continues. Fire Fighters not only are our most

important stakeholder, but are our best champions and ambassadors.

Last year Canadian Fire Fighters raised $3.3 million m support of those affected by neuromuscular

disorders. We are especially proud of the achievements and accomplishments of the Ontario Fire Fighters.

From April 1st, 2015 - March 31^, 2016, with the support of 265 Ontario Fire Departments / Associations, Ontario Fire Fighters together raised $1,192,712. Congratuladons!

Tliank you South Frontenac Fire Department - Pordand Station for your dedication and commitment. Yomgenerous gift of $3,164.40 during this past year is helping to change the lives of those affected. Vt e are T

committed to Improving the quality of life for the thousands of Canadians affected. From financial assistance

to emotional support, from advocacy to education, we are on the ground, giving support to everyday

Canadians in whatever they need. Our research has led to advancements in treatments, and has helped

Canadians with neuromuscular disorders live longer, more enriched lives.

Fire Fighter fundraising continues to be our largest and most significant source of revenue and

we are

extremely proud to be your partner. Muscular Dystrophy Canada and Fire Fighters have been funding research and searching for a cure for neuromuscuhr disoriers for mate than 60 years. With the help of Fire Fighter., continue to get closer.

we

Together Fire Fighters are saying I Can! If we all say I Can, We \ViU make a difference. Warmest Regards,

y)a^(.(a, /kuo^&x/t Pamela Musgrave Director of Revenue Development

CC: Mayor Ron Vandc\val. Tfmnship ofSourii Frontenac

Ontario & Nunavut Region, Ottawa Community Office: 150 Isabella Street, Suite 301, Ottawa, ON K1S 1V7 T 613.232.7334 1.866.337.3365 F 613.567.2288 W muscle.ca

^.SP.E.CI^T_l?A^.y.o.,FIR5 Fl?H^E^!ij?N^H-^R VOLUNTEERS FOR THE’R OUTSTANDING WORK IN MOVING MUSCLES FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS. Taxation Charity Registration Number | 10775 5837 RROOD1

Page 127 of 136

LIMESTONE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 220 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, ON, K7M 0G2 T: 613-544-6920 | Toll Free: 1-800-267-0935 | TTY: 613-548-0279 | F: 613-544-6804 www.limestone.on.ca | Twitter @LimestoneDSB

Mayor Ron Vandewal – Township of South Frontenac Re: LDSB Long-Term Accommodation Plan

May 26, 2016

Dear Mayor Vandewal: Trustees of the Limestone District School Board (LDSB) received, for information, a Long-Term Accommodation Plan prepared by consultants Ameresco earlier this week. I am sharing some key points in the event constituents reach out to municipal leaders with questions. We have shared information with LDSB staff, MPP Sophie Kiwala and MPP Scott Reid. Firstly, the Ministry of Education requires that all school boards complete long-term accommodation plans to increase operating efficiencies, manage excess capacity in schools and ensure stable enrolments for strong programming opportunities for students. All school boards in Ontario are in varying stages of this process. Secondly, no decisions have been made at this time. Trustees must approve either a Consultation or Pupil Accommodation Review of school(s) before any consolidations, closures, new schools or boundary changes can occur. Senior Staff would be required to present an initial report to Trustees for Board approval. The accommodation plan framework is designed to address student accommodation and program needs over the next 15 years, and contains a number of suggestions concerning school consolidations/closures, new schools/additions and boundary changes through to 2030. These recommendations have been received by Trustees, but do not commit the Board to any specific course of action or timeline. Limestone currently has 4,000 surplus pupil spaces as the pre-school and school-age population in our region continues to decline leading to lower enrolment. There is insufficient funding to meet the maintenance and repair needs of Limestone schools. Although facility partnerships may provide opportunities for schools to rent surplus space, this does not address programming pressures or reduce surplus pupil spaces. In order for the Board to provide equitable opportunities for all students, a review of student accommodation is required. Limestone, like many schools boards across the province, continues to be challenged by declining enrolment, aging and surplus school facilities, and rising renewal and operation costs. Our first priority has been, and will always be, our students. It is the Board’s responsibility to provide quality and equitable programming while being fiscally responsible. With this information, our own data, and consultation, the Board will find the best way to accommodate our students, while enhancing programs and learning opportunities for our students. The Long-Term Accommodation Plan will be available on our website shortly. To help answer questions from families and community members, we have crafted a frequently asked questions document, which I have included. Sincerely,

Debra Rantz, Director of Education David Jackson – Chair | Debra Rantz – Director of Education and Secretary | Paul Babin – Treasurer

Our Students, Our Future

Page 128 of 136

LIMESTONE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 220 Portsmouth Avenue, Kingston, ON, K7M 0G2 T: 613-544-6920 | Toll Free: 1-800-267-0935 | TTY: 613-548-0279 | F: 613-544-6804 www.limestone.on.ca | Twitter @LimestoneDSB

Frequently Asked Questions re Long-Term Accommodation Plan What is a Long-Term Accommodation Plan? A long-term accommodation plan is designed to address student accommodation and program needs over the next 15 years taking in to account projected student enrolment, facility utilization, facility condition, transportation, new school construction, boundary adjustments and student programming. Why do we need a Long-Term Accommodation Plan? The Ministry of Education requires that all school boards complete long-term accommodation plans to increase operating efficiencies, manage excess capacity in schools and ensure stable enrolments for strong programming opportunities for students. All school boards in Ontario are in varying stages of this process. How many schools are impacted by the plan? Over the next 15 years, 16 schools may be affected by a closure or consolidation. It is important to note that no decisions have been made at this time. These recommendations have been received by Trustees, but do not commit the Board to any specific course of action or timeline. Trustees must first approve either a Consultation or Pupil Accommodation Review of school(s) before any consolidations, closures, new schools or boundary changes can occur. Senior Staff would be required to present an initial report to Trustees for Board approval. Is the plan set it stone? These recommendations have been received by Trustees, but do not commit the Board to any specific course of action or timeline. Trustees must first approve either a Consultation or Pupil Accommodation Review of school(s) before any consolidations, closures, new schools or boundary changes can occur. Senior Staff would be required to present an initial report to Trustees for Board approval. When could we see changes? In September 2016, the Board will meet with municipal and community partners to share the plan and to receive and discuss relevant planning information. Senior Staff would be required to present an initial report to Trustees for Board approval before any Consultation or Pupil Accommodation Review of school(s) before any consolidations, closures, new schools or boundary changes can occur.

David Jackson – Chair | Debra Rantz – Director of Education and Secretary | Paul Babin – Treasurer

Our Students, Our Future

Page 129 of 136 Does this mean school staff will lose their jobs? Previous school consolidations and closures have sometimes affected staffing. Any changes to staffing would follow normal procedures under current collective agreements. Isn’t this all about saving money? No. Limestone currently has more than 4,000 surplus pupil spaces as the pre-school and school-age population in our region continues to decline leading to lower enrolment. Smaller enrolments lead to multi-grade classes and fewer programming and extra-curricular opportunities for students. Also, there is insufficient funding to meet the maintenance and repair needs of Limestone schools while maintain a balanced budget as the Board is required to do. Although facility partnerships may provide opportunities for schools to rent surplus space, this does not address programming pressures or reduce surplus pupil spaces. What happens next? In September 2016, the Board will meet with municipal and community partners to share the plan and to receive and discuss relevant planning information. Following these meetings, the plan may be revised. Before any Consultation or Pupil Accommodation Review of school(s) before any consolidations, closures, new schools or boundary changes can occur, senior Staff would be required to present an initial report to Trustees for Board approval. FAQS updated May 26, 2016

David Jackson – Chair | Debra Rantz – Director of Education and Secretary | Paul Babin – Treasurer

Our Students, Our Future

Page 130 of 136

June 1, 2016 To:

Municipal CAOs and Clerks, Cataraqui Source Protection Area

RE:

MUNICIPAL REPRESENTATIVES – CATARAQUI SOURCE PROTECTION COMMITTEE

This letter provides an update regarding the appointment of municipal representatives to the Cataraqui Source Protection Committee, further to our correspondence of January 29, 2016. Thank you for sharing Council resolutions and other input on this topic in recent months. On May 25th the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority passed a resolution to appoint a roster of Committee members for the coming years. The four municipal representatives are outlined below. Area

Municipalities

Representative

Eastern Area

Township of Athens City of Brockville Township of Elizabethtown-Kitley Township of Front of Yonge Town of Gananoque Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands Township of Rideau Lakes

Peter Raabe, Lyn Director of Environmental Services, City of Brockville

Central Area

Township of Frontenac Islands City of Kingston Township of South Frontenac

Greg Newman, Kingston Manager, Policy Planning, City of Kingston

Western Area

Town of Greater Napanee Loyalist Township

Ric Bresee, Amherstview Deputy-Mayor, Loyalist Township

Representative at-large

All

John Conley, Athens Former Mayor, Township of Athens

An official notice and member biographies will be posted shortly to the www.cleanwatercataraqui.ca website. If you have any related questions, please contact me via 613-546-4228 ext. 224 or rmcrae@crca.ca. Yours truly, (original signed by)

Rob McRae MCIP, RPP Watershed Planning Coordinator c.c.

Robert Morrison, Chair, Cataraqui Source Protection Authority John C. Williamson, Chair, Cataraqui Source Protection Committee Municipal representatives, Cataraqui Source Protection Committee

Page 131 of 136

Township of Wainfleet “Wainfleet - find your country side!”

May 24th, 2016 Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100, 4432 George Street Sydenham, ON K0H 2T0 VIA EMAIL to: worr@southfrontenac.net RE:

Renewable Procurement Initiatives – Resolution of Support

Dear Mr. Orr, Thank you for your recent correspondence, received by our office on April 21st, 2016. Please be advised that Council for the Township of Wainfleet, at its meeting held on May 3rd, 2016, passed the following resolution: THAT correspondence item no. 178 from the Township if South Frontenac regarding a resolution passed by its Council on April 19th, 2016, calling upon the Provincial government to regulate that where there is not a willing municipal host for large renewable energy projects and subsequently no community benefit agreement in place and green energy projects are awarded anyway, that the successful proponents would be responsible to pay the municipality the associated costs to both infrastructure and operations commonly known as a Community Vibrancy Fund, be received; AND THAT Council for the Township of Wainfleet does hereby support said resolution. Trusting this information will be of assistance to you. Sincerely,

Sarah Smith Acting Clerk

31940 Highway #3 • P.O. Box 40 • Wainfleet, ON • L0S 1V0 PHONE 905.899.3463 • FAX 905.899.2340 • www.wainfleet.ca

Page 132 of 136

RECBVF.O

May 11,2016

f-

^ 3s

-> r-

;ih&

To^Hir^

Wayne Orr

so^’^T£NA£

Chief Administrative Officer

Township of South Frontenac P.O. Box 100 5862

4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario KOH2TO Re: Community Vibrancy Fund

At the regular council meeting of May 1,2016, Council reviewed the Township of South Frontenac’s request for support on the attached resolution. As a result of the review Council passed a resolution in support of the resolution.

I trust you will find this satisfactory, but should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Yours truly/ Robert AugerLLB.

Manager, Legislative Services/Clerk Ext 1132

Email: rauger@essex<ca RA/lm Enclosure

:;i3Tri;Dct<‘tTeeT South Es:?ex,Gr’tdr!c\S^’|A8 v.-vu’.’/.essL-’.ca

i t 5197"6733u f 319 776 8811

Page 133 of 136

.^

^

/

^

^. /^

1

^

/

r

^ y

^

^

-r-

^

^

^

rf

^

^

.,

/

^

/

^

f

.^

f

^

^

J .. - .-

^

I

*i

^

^

^

to

^

^..>/:f

May 19, 2016 <

^ ^./^F-re

Main Office: 32 Commissioner Street

KtUamey, Ontario POM2AO

Tel: 705-287-2424 Tel: 888-597-2721 Fax: 705-287-2660

Township of South Frontenac

^wr^ L.f .

PO Box 100, 5862

^ .y

‘»

4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario

^-

rf <

i..

^

SOUTH H:, ^.^c ^/.l

KOH 2TO

^.

i.i

f-

Dear Mr. Orr:

townkill@vianet.on.ca

Attached hereto is Resolution #16-190 passed at the Regular Meeting of Council held May 18, 2016 which is self-explanatory.

Public Works Department:

office.

1096 Hwy 637 KUlamey, Ontario

Sincerely

POM2AO

THE MUNICIPALITY OF KILLARNEY

E-mail:

Should you have any questions, please contact the municipal s

Tel: 705-287-1040 Tel: 866-512-5048 Fax; 705-287-1141 E-mail:

ldUarney_pw/31xplomet.ca

(Miss.) Angie Burke

;

Administrative Assistant Attachment

Web site:

www.mmucipality.ldUarney.on.ca

^ *

/

./

/

^

rf

4

Wayne Orr, CAO

/

ec: Township of Georgian Bay Minister of Transport, Marc Garneav

Word: Letters-GeneralLetters: South Frontenaac-No Wake-19-05-2016

Page 134 of 136 THEMUNICIPALIP^OF -*

r*

^

T .-

^> *f~ -^

LAMBT3N; ,.~~;x>.: “^^y~~^

i_

\

^

0 ^

^

Administration Office - 7883 Amtelecom Parkway, Forest, ON NoN iJo T: 519-786-2335/1-877-786-2335 F: 519-786-2135

RECEIVED’

? r–

May 20, 2016

w^?^ TOWNSHIP OF

Township of South Frontenac

SOUTH FRONTENAC

P.O. Box 100

4432 George Street Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2TO

Attention: Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Dear Mr. Orr

Thank you for your letter of April 21, 2016 regarding the Township of South Frontenac’s endorsement of the resolution passed by the Township of Georgian Bay on March 14, 2016 requesting the implementation of legislation that would provide authorities with the ability to enforce the “No Wake” restriction on Ontario’s navigable waters. Council reviewed your letter at the May 17, 2016 Council meeting and the motion passed, by Council at that time, was to receive and file this letter. Sincerely, n

/

\

Nan^Wri^ht-L^cing, BA, CMO Clerk

Page 135 of 136

T

.

//

f

*-

/

-I

^

-^

.< T-:L ^^

^

-‘V /

.^

^ ^

^

<”

^

.>*

<^

^ '

/^

/ ^

^

f

r

d

‘/

/

J

n>-

1

.

-r-

^ to

^ / ^ / >, .

RECEJVED ^

‘*

May 19, 2016 If

^ t J *

^.-;i;

1~J

OF

SOUTflj ONTENAC Wayne Orr, CAO

Township of South Frontenac

Main Office;

PO Box 100, 5862

32 Commissioner Street

4432 George Street

Killarney, Ontario POM 2AO

Tel: 705-287-2424 Tel: 888-597-2721 Fax: 705-287-2660

Sydenham, Ontario KOH 2TO

Dear Mr. On”:

E-mail:

Attached hereto is Resolution #16-189 passed at the Regular

townlull@vianet.on.ca

Meeting of Council held May 18, 2016 which is self-explanatory.

Public Works Department:

office.

Should you have any questions, please contact the municipal 1096 Hwy 637 KiUarney, Ontario

Sincerely,

POM2AO

THE MUNICIPALITY OF KILLARNEY

Tel: 705-287-10-*0 Tel: 866-512-5048 Fax: 705-287-1141 E-mail:

kiUaTey_pw@xplomet.ca

F»

(Miss.) Arigie Burke, Administrative Assistant Attachment

Web site:

www.municipality.kaiarney.on.ca

^

/

/ I

t ^

f-

?:AY ri ‘-Qf.wiO

/ /

ec: Premier Wynne Local MPPs IESO

Association of Municipalities Ontario (AMO)

Word: Letters-GeneralLetters: South Frontenaac-Renewable Procurement-19-05-2016

Page 136 of 136

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW 2016-37 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM GENERALLY PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC. THEREFORE THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC, BY ITS COUNCIL, HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.

The actions of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of South Frontenac at its Council Meeting of June 7th, 2016 be confirmed.

Execution by the Mayor and the Clerk-Administrator of all Deeds, Instruments and other Documents necessary to give effect to any such Resolution, Motion or other action and the affixing of the Corporate Seal to any such Deed, Instruments or other Documents is hereby authorized and confirmed.

This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of its passage.

Dated at the Township of South Frontenac this 7th day of June, 2016. Read a first and second time this 7th day of June, 2016. Read a third time and finally passed this 7th day of June, 2016. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FRONTENAC

Ron Vandewal, Mayor

Wayne Orr, Chief Administrative Officer

Share

Help support independent journalism

If NFNM’s reporting matters to you, Buy Me a Coffee is a simple way to help keep local watchdog coverage going.